You are on page 1of 55


Dr Stephen Hopwood, 48, was educated at a comprehensive school in Cambridgeshire and graduated from Bristol University Medical School in 1985. After working as an NHS hospital doctor and GP in Bristol for four years, he qualifyied in Traditional Chinese Acupuncture in 1989. After moving to Devon 18 years ago, he became the Clinical Director of the Arcturus Complementary Health Centre in Totnes. He now lives in Buckland in the Moor, is a keen mountain biker and has two sons aged 17 and 20 years. As an active member of the community Stephen is keen to promote development of local community centres and youth clubs, develop educational programmes on global politics and community action initiatives and support small business development. Stephen first became involved in politics after realising 9/11 was an inside job, establishing the Totnes Truth Movement to expose the realities of the world we live in, not usually publicised in the national media. The open group meets monthly in the Barrel House. He also works as a producer for an internet video documentary channel,, which runs a weekly show on Sky channel 200 called Lawful Rebellion (6pm, Saturdays) covering issues like the banking industry, the EU, the globalisation agenda, and implementation of the codex alimentarius. Dr Stephen Hopwood will be a true independent voice for Totnes and the surrounding towns and villages. "Having worked in Totnes for the past 16 years I feel that I can contribute significantly to this constituency by working as an independent MP. I am willing to stand for the truth. I promise not to remain silent on the crucial issues affecting our nation. To honour the Hippocratic Oath, I know I have to speak out about the real threats to our health. I will act diligently to respond to all the major issues that are relevant to this constituency. After reviewing the evidence, I hope you feel the same way’
Steve Hopwood 0777 987 0415
Printed and published by Unit 3 Fair Oak Close, Exeter Airport Business Park, Clyst Honiton, Exeter, Devon. EX5 2UL Promoted by Dr Stephen Hopwood, 56, Whiteley Ave, Totnes TQ9 5 FQ Opposite is the Arcturus Centre, Fore Street, Totnes where Steve practises holistic medicine


The Truth Manifesto

Contents Welcome to another way Health Globalisation Money and Debt War Environment Law Spirituality The way forward 3 4 6 10 14 26 41 48 51 53


Welcome to another way
In an age of universal deceit, telling the Truth becomes a revolutionary act
George Orwell, author of 1984

Time to examine the evidence for yourself Time to stand up for the Truth
Normally, like many of you, come the election, I would be sitting there thinking: ‘What a waste of time. Whoever we elect, the same timeservers and placemen get in again.’ So normally I would just turn the other way and devote my energies to my family, my job and Totnes Truth. After all, voting only seems to encourage them. But this time, I feel differently. The recent rise in both the national and personal debt has meant that we are being sold into effective slavery by Big Government and Big Banks. At the same time, the very fabric of public life has broken down. We can be imprisoned without trial when the war criminals in the Cabinet have escaped justice for their part in the murder of 2 million people in Iraq. Obvious injustices -- combined with my own research into and experience of the real agenda of the power elite and the lack of mainstream alternatives -- have meant that I feel compelled to stand in the forthcoming general election.

The state of play
When 18 years of Conservative government ended in 1997 and Labour were swept to power, the majority of Britons hoped for a new era of justice, peace and prosperity. Thirteen years later, those same voters have seen the depth of betrayal Gordon Brown and the Labour Party have perpetrated on Britain. They have entered us into illegal wars; taken away our basic rights; have plunged the UK into record levels of debt; and done everything within their power to give away our sovereignty. Clearly, the problem is not any particular political party. It is the way we are governed in this country. Accordingly, all the major parties propose to take us into further European integration, which is a stepping stone to one-world authoritarian government accountable to the International Monetary Fund, the central banks and big multinational corporations. Remote government is also the real reason the area has lost Dartington College of Arts, costing the local economy £5million a year. Without a grant of
Dartington Arts College has been moved to Cornwall at a loss of £5million a year to the local economy


The Truth Manifesto

£3.5million from the central government regional development agency to finance the move away, the college would still be here. When I first became aware of the agenda of the power elite, I was angry, shocked, initially powerless in the face of it. As a single parent bringing up two boys in Devon, what could I do to stop the powerful cliques that manipulate governments, media and economies from getting away with murder? The more I researched though, the more I found supportive individuals who shared my understanding of the realities of our world. With few resources but guided by our consciences, we began to expose the forces behind manipulated war, invasive laws and never-ending debt. Although frightening, it felt better than burying our heads in the sand, hoping the harsh realities would just go away.

A call to action
No mainstream candidate will ever be free to actually represent the views of the Totnes constituency because under the whip system party bosses instruct mainstream MPs which way to vote in parliament. The same party bosses are beholden to the party's backers who financed their election. No matter who you vote for in the mainstream, once in 'power', they become powerless. In the forthcoming general election, I will be working with other independent candidates in the shared belief that truth and justice are the very foundation of freedom, peace and prosperity. There will no whips to tell us how to vote. We don’t have any big financial backers trying to bend us to their will. That will mean that I can better serve the individual needs of the constituents of Totnes. Check out the evidence in this manifesto for yourself. Then stand up for the Truth. If you don't do it for yourself then do it for your children -- for if the world carries on like this -- they will be saddled with working every hour just to pay the national debt, depriving them of the opportunities people of my generation enjoyed in life. So come the election, it is imperative to have the courage of your convictions, to vote independent for real representation in parliament but above all to claim back our country, our communities, putting the heart and voice back into the Totnes constituency.

Dr Stephen Hopwood
1st May 2010


The best doctor gives the least medicines
Benjamin Franklin, polymath and founding father of the USA

It is little measure of good health to be well adjusted to a sick society
Krishnamurti, J Krishnamurti, shamen and guru

Our society is sick and this is a fundamental cause of disease: much of our ill health is caused by the stresses and expense of modern life under the debt system and by industrial by-products polluting our immediate and wider environment. We know that the NHS budget is not being spent wisely because people are getting sicker. Motivated solely by profit, the pharmaceutical industry monopolises the NHS, inducing doctors to prescribe drugs which have negligible benefits and dangerous side-effects. In conjunction with Big Pharma, the UN’s World Health Organisation sponsors vaccination programmes, in which the vaccines are injected along with dangerous toxins. Big Pharma has created spurious new ‘conditions’ and the drugs to supposedly treat them. In independent trials, many of pharmaceutical drugs have been proven to work no more effectively than placebos.

• Treat people with proven natural therapies and medicines to re-build the health of our nation. They must be placed at the heart of NHS funding to save £billions in the short and long term. • Subject pharmaceutical drugs, particularly vaccines and anti-virals, to proper objective trials to establish their efficacy and safety. • Encourage victims of pharmaceutical industry drugs to seek compensation under the Common Law. • The end of the national debt will free up enormous amounts of government tax income to spend on the nation’s health. • The end of personal debt will free up leisure time, ending many stress-induced illnesses.


The Truth Manifesto

Your health is your real wealth
Prevention is far better than cure
I am a Registered Medical Practitioner with the General Medical Council and a registered Acupuncturist with the British Acupuncture Council. For the last 15 years, I have worked as an holistic physician running the Arcturus Complementary Health Clinic on Fore Street in Totnes. I came out of the NHS as I felt it was monopolised by the pharmaceutical industry and had no strategy for building the health of the population, as the prime means of preventing disease. Over-reliant on pharmaceutical industry drugs and research, the NHS puts the emphasis on prescribing pharmaceutical drugs, designed to treat only specific symptoms -- like antiinflammatories -- which then created unhealthy side-effects, which also had to be treated. It was almost as if the industry wanted people to get sick so they could find new drugs to treat new conditions. But rather than take on Big Pharma directly, I left the NHS and set up the health service I considered to best serve the needs of our community, the Arcturus Complementary Health Centre in Totnes. Qualified and experienced practitioners, specialising in osteopathy, chiropractic, homeopathy, acupuncture, herbalism and counselling all work to build health and treat the root causes of disease. healing holistically. From my extensive experience of both conventional and traditional medicine, I can tell you which one I trust to give the best long term health benefits. We should put 'complementary' medicine at the heart of the NHS while subjecting conventional drugs and methods to stringent trials to evaluate their efficacy and safety. This is particularly relevant in the case of vaccinations. Although the WHO will tell you that a WHO-sponsored immunization programme wiped out smallpox within ten years, the overall trend showed that the disease was due to die out anyway. Vaccines also contain a mindboggling array of chemicals, which are simply not good for you. Dr Len Horowitz on the dangers of vaccination: Vaccination programmes and the spread of AIDS: ndex=22 A short film about the dangers of the anti-polio vaccination:


Business as usual at Big Pharma
There are many examples of the clear conflict of interest between Big Pharma’s claim to be working in the best interests of the health of our nation and its profit- driven agenda.

‘Swine flu’
Take the recent ‘swine flu’ fiasco, for example. In January 2010 Wolfgang Wodarg, head of health at the Council of Europe, accused Big Pharma of organising a ‘campaign of panic’ to put pressure on the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic in order to sell untested vaccines at a profit of £billions. He described the false pandemic as:
one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century. It's just a normal kind of flu. It does not cause a tenth of deaths caused by the classic seasonal flu. The great campaign of panic we have seen provided a golden opportunity for representatives from labs who knew they would hit the jackpot in the case of a pandemic being declared. We want to clarify everything that brought about this massive operation of disinformation. We want to know who made decisions, on the basis of what evidence, and precisely how the influence of the pharmaceutical industry came to bear on the decisionmaking. A group of people in the WHO is associated very closely with the pharmaceutical industry.

Another example is the ‘anti-viral’ drug, Tamiflu. Its producer Roche claims there are ten studies proving Tamiflu is both safe and effective. According to the company, the drug has all sorts of benefits, including a 61% reduction in hospital admissions by people who catch the flu and then get put on Tamiflu. The problem with these claims is that they aren’t true. They were simply invented by Roche. A groundbreaking article recently published in the British Medical Journal accuses Roche of misleading governments and physicians over the benefits of Tamiflu. Out of the ten studies cited by Roche, it turns out only two were ever published in science journals. The original data from those two studies has however been lost. The only complete data set Roche could release was part of an unpublished study of 1,447 adults which showed that Tamiflu was no better than placebo. Roche then hired former employees of a Big Pharma PR agency, Adis International, to 'ghost write' the studies with Roche’s marketing department simply telling them what to write.


The Truth Manifesto

In another case, Dr Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as 'proof' that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. But the entire study was faked. As a result of Dr Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. Reuben will also have to retract 21 articles he wrote for medical journals which have also been fabricated. After confessing to his fraud, Dr Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.


I believe first of all that we now need nothing short of a world constitution for the global financial system.
Gordon Brown

Maintain humanity at 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. Guide reproduction wisely improving fitness and diversity
Guide Georgia Guidestones

We have never been able to trust the political class to protect our freedoms and sovereignty. Experience shows that Big Government is answerable to Big Media and Big Business and is unable to stand up for the rights of its people and maintain equitability, justice and peace. Non-governmental organisations like the IMF, the Privy Council, the Bilderberg group or the Trilateral Commission are secretive and unaccountable yet exert enormous influence over our political class and government policy, particularly with regard to defence spending. Leaders like Gordon Brown are in the vanguard of creating a one-world global government using the debt system to further erode our rights and representation.

• • • • The end of the national debt will end government obligations to the international financiers who are driving globalisation. Insist on our sovereignty as a nation. Put honour and integrity at the heart of public life. Public figures to declare membership of secret societies and attendance at Bilderberg and similar meetings. • • • Devolve power to local communities, localising trade, media and representation. Rely on the Common Law guarantee of rights and protections. Opt out of UK Plc.

The Georgia Guidestones, erected 22nd March 1980 by the mysterious R C Christian. They appear to propose massively reducing the world’s population through eugenics. The US formulation of the date -03/22/80 -- may refer us to the secret society Skull and Bones, who attach special significance to the number 322.


The Truth Manifesto

Localisation is anti-globalisation
It is becoming more apparent to us every day that mainstream democracy is a sham. We are expected to believe that the state of the world is a testament to the incompetence of our leaders, the selfishness of the few, the failure of institutions to agree or even the stupidity of the people. Whether it is the treaty of Lisbon allowing the European Union to take over ever greater swathes of policy in this country or shadowy think tanks imposing their will behind closed doors, or it is illegal war and false flag terrorism; or ever more oppressive and interfering government; or health scares to sell toxic vaccinations, it is clear that our problems are not happening for the reasons above or by accident. There is a conspiracy to weaken, subdue and control humanity. Fortunately, in this day and age of the internet, anyone can find out about the New World Order they propose in which we are the serfs and they are not just the landed, propertied classes but are also the global government. In this area, their plans are more advanced than many will imagine and have the tacit support of mainstream leaders like Gordon Brown.
In December 2008, even the Financial Times acknowledged the trend towards World Government

Secret societies
If fifteen years ago, you had told journalists that there was an annual secretive meeting of bankers, politicians and journalists whose purpose was to influence governments to bend to its will, then you would have been called a ‘conspiracy theorist’. Now, meetings of the Bilderberg Group are mentioned in the Daily Mail and the Guardian and a list of attendees now appears (unofficially) on the Net, although there is still no public record of what is discussed behind closed doors. Peter Mandelson, minister and chairman of the Privy Council, George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, the oil company, were on the list for 2008.

We also know there are a whole host of other similar groups like the Trilateral Commission, the Carlyle Group and probably many more we never hear about at

"So let me reassure you today; as long as I remain Prime Minister, Britain will stay firmly in Europe's mainstream, never in its backwaters."
Brown Gordon Brown
19 February 2010 m/22/20100219/tpl-ukbritain-brown20b2d2f.html

all, including a whole range of secret societies, of which Opus Dei, a wing of the Catholic Church, and the freemasons are the most obvious public face. In 2004,


both candidates in the US presidential election George W Bush and John Kerry were members of Skull and Bones, an exclusive secret society run through Yale University.

These non-governmental organisations are not just there to lobby governments and parliaments behind the scenes, insisting on policies, which are in direct contradiction to the public good, but they also play a key role in choosing the politicians we then get to vote for.

World currency and Big Government
Thrown into this already dangerous mix are various initiatives to end even the pretence of democracy. Enforcement of carbon taxes is being used to introduce world government under the pretext of the G20 monitoring each nation’s CO2 output. The failure of the world economy is being used to introduce a world currency with a global central bank courtesy of the International Monetary Fund. In this context, the G20 summit of early 2009 stated:
We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250billion (£170billion) into the world economy and increase global liquidity.

SDRs or Special Drawing Rights are a ‘synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund’. The US, Canada and Mexico now form Nafta or the North American Free Trade Association and there are plans to introduce a single currency, the Amero, to replace dollars and pesos as a precursor to another federal superstate, in the same way the Euro paved the way to a more federal Europe. And you don’t have to be a little Englander to see that the European Union is another visible landmark on the march to one world government. Where the people were allowed to vote in places like France, the Netherlands and Ireland, they rejected a closer union of nation states but in the case of Ireland were made to vote again until they got it right. Despite being promised a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, we were not allowed to make our voice heard. There has clearly been no meaningful consent to greater European integration on the part of the British people. I am no fan of Westminster democracy but experience has shown that Big Government, like Big Business, becomes a self-perpetuating monolith no longer answerable to anyone but the banks. Yet politicians like Gordon Brown have supported moves to create a central world bank – most likely in the form of the IMF -- with a total monopoly over the money supply, answerable to nobody. In February 2010, Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for a world constitution to regulate the financial system. Brown said a global solution was required to "I believe first of all that we now need nothing short of a world constitution for the global financial system."
Gordon Brown
19 February 2010 m/22/20100219/tpl-ukbritain-brown20b2d2f.html


The Truth Manifesto

transform financial services and called for greater involvement of the IMF in regulating the financial system.

De facto unaccountable World Government is the inevitable consequence of this, dictating policy to nations, presidents, prime ministers, parliaments and local assemblies, no matter what the people vote for.

Stopping globalisation
These would-be powers have shown no respect for the law in their march toward World Government. One of the stepping stones on the way, the European Union, is actually an unlawful corporation: it has never successfully undergone an external audit – symptomatic also of widespread corruption. However, its constitution respects the ‘rule of law’ or the Common Law, which is of course the solution to the whole problem of government: we simply opt out of its ‘authority’. The right to opt-out is provided in English constitutional law documents, like Magna Carta and the 1689 Declaration of Rights, which enshrine our free man rights and our duty to God in the form of the oath. To be clear that duty is first discharged by ‘doing as you would be done by’ or causing no loss, harm or injury to another man (or woman). In any case, no constitutional document, treaty, convention or statute law can take way your rights because according to Black’s Law dictionary a right is God-given and cannot be taken away by any man. You are born free and owe no liability or lien to any corporation, whether it is the UK, the European Union or World Government. So if you do not consent, you do not have to pay the debts they have run up or obey the unjust laws they pass. As part of my campaign, I will be informing you about the conspiracy against humanity and offering through my website practical support in freeing yourself from it by growing your own food, sourcing your own energy and trading on a more local level. If elected MP, I will do everything in my power to resist tyranny and spread the good news about the Common Law.

The motto on the Sovereign’s Coat of Arms, ‘Dieu et Mon Droit’ translates as ‘God and My Duty’, the guiding principle of the Common Law


Money and Debt
Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws
(1744Mayer Anshlem Rothshild, (1744-1812) founder of the House of Rothschild banking dynasty

The national debt is fraud, extortion and daylight robbery. It allows rich, powerful and unaccountable bankers to exert enormous influence over government and society and to profit from your labour through taxation. It makes a mockery of democracy. Homes are being repossessed, businesses bankrupted and we all work harder for less. Private banks issue money out of thin air, as a debt and at interest. This creates inflation, devalues the currency and causes escalating poverty. No government in this country has ever reduced the national debt. The mainstream parties are all committed to reducing the deficit – the rate we get further into debt – rather than reducing or abolishing the debt all together.

• • • Government to issue debt free currency, cancelling the national debt. Bankers to cancel all personal debt, including mortgages. Mass non-compliance with council and income tax until our taxes are used for the public good. With the simple stroke of a pen, this policy will: • • • • • • remove the need for income tax. clear the budget deficit and allow increased spending on public services. return wealth to its creators – you. end the influence of shadowy private bankers. end the need for constant economic expansion at the ruin of the planet. create greater freedom and leisure time.

Money as Debt: Zeitgeist addendum: The Money Masters: BBC video on the debt


The Truth Manifesto

Cancel the debt
Debt makes a mockery of democracy
It is time we learnt the lesson of history. It’s time we learnt where our taxes really go. We currently live in a debt economy in which the banks have devised ever more devious ways of depriving us of the real value of our labour. Whether it is the national debt, carbon trading schemes or fractional reserve banking, they all take a share of our real wealth by inventing monetary value – usually on computer screens – and charging us for the privilege through interest and taxation. The government has spent tens of billions of pounds bailing out banks like Northern Rock or the Royal Bank of Scotland at an enormous cost to the taxpayer but cannot find the piffling amounts needed to establish the efficacy of alternative energy or healthcare.

The national debt
If we are to reform power, we must understand the basis on which it perpetuates. I have therefore gone into some depth about how money and debt have always been created hand in hand to control governments and people.

The inception and growth of the debt
English monarchs traditionally taxed their people to pay off any debt accumulated as a result of war. However, King Charles I’s attempts to impose taxes on an unwilling populace to pay off his war debts in the mid-17th century led to the Civil War, Charles’s beheading, the English Republic under Cromwell, the Restoration (of the monarchy), the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the Nine Years' War. By 1694, the English Government's finances had been ravaged. Having nowhere else to turn, the nation was forced to borrow £1.2 million -- at 8% interest -from the newly formed Bank of England, a private corporation of investors whose names are not known to this day. The national debt was born. As banking and financial markets enabled the creation of debt through the issue of bills and bonds in the early 18th century, the national debt grew to £850m by the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815. The First World War saw Britain’s national debt increase around 1000% from £650m in 1914 to £7.4bn in 1919. After the Second World War, it stood at £24.7bn. It is clear that war has been the main reason for our debt.
After the Nine Years’ War, Britain was bankrupt. King William III was forced to allow the moneymen to set up the Bank of England in 1694, creating the national debt


Post-war peace and economic stability meant that the debt did not increase significantly for a generation. However, rampant inflation caused our liability to the Bank of England to rise again significantly, from £33.1bn in 1970 to £197.4bn in 1988.

The national debt now
When Labour came to power in 1997, the national debt stood at £350billion. On current projections, it is now around £900billion. In four years, it will be £1.4trillion -£1,400,000,000,000 -- according to the government’s own conservative forecast. In just five months last year -- between March and July 2009 -- the Bank of England literally created £113.8 billion of new money or new debt. By January 2010, the UK's total borrowing for this financial year had come to more than £122bn, which the government will have to fund from your taxes. The government now has to find the equivalent of £14,500 from every man, woman and child in the UK to meet its commitments to the national debt and the interest it incurs -- more than a year’s take home pay for many – before it can invest in the British people. The interest alone will cost us £43 billion this year or an average of £1,200 per UK household in taxes, which will not be invested in industry, infrastructure or people but will line the pockets of the already rich international bankers. According to the Centre for Policy Studies, the real figures are much worse, when all the public sector pension and PFI liabilities are included. (Because these debts are not payable now, they are not included in the national debt. Money will nevertheless have to be found to service them eventually). When these are included, our real national debt now stands at closer to £1.5trillion.

In January 2010, the government had to borrow another £4.3 billion to plug the growing hole in the UK's finances, according to the Office for National Statistics. The government had expected to see a surplus, allowing it to repay around £2.8bn of its debts, meaning its forecast was £7.1 billion out. It was the first time the government had been forced to ‘borrow money’ in January -- usually a bumper month for income from tax receipts -- since records began.

Where money comes from
The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.
William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England in 1694

Ever wondered where the money came from that will put us well over £1.4trillion in debt within a few years? The truth is governments across the world borrow off central banks, like the Bank of England, at interest, creating debt. In effect, the Bank of England simply creates new money out of thin air, currently described by the Bank as ‘quantitative easing’. But creating new money --


The Truth Manifesto

whether it is paper or adding figures to a computer balance sheet -- does not create new wealth. Our paper money is currently backed by nothing other than a ‘promise to pay’. Think you can walk into the Bank of England and get £10 pounds’ worth of silver or gold? Read the small print. ‘I promise to pay the bearer on demand’, not ‘I will pay the bearer on demand’. Demand your real value in exchange for a banknote and you get a promise you will be paid in future. So our legal tender is actually a promissory note carrying a debt raised at interest, worth less than the paper it is written on. The money to pay the interest on the debt is taken out of your real wealth. You and the value of your labour are the collateral or security for the government loan from the bankers. Governments do not have or create wealth. So they make you pay the loan back on their behalf through taxation.

The Power of the Banks
I sincerely believe… that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.
Thomas Jefferson, founding father of USA Jefferson,

Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate
Garfield, James Garfield, US President assassinated after taking on the bankers

When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they -- and not the leaders of the government-- control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.
Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.
Wilson, signing existence: Woodrow Wilson, US President, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence:

Despite internet myths that only countries without central banks like Iran, North Korea and Sudan are targeted for war, every government in the world is answerable to a central bank.


In the UK, it is the Bank of England. In the Eurozone, it is the European Central Bank. In the US, it is the Federal Reserve. All central banks are answerable to their customers or shareholders, private investors. Under banking laws, any corporation or company must put the interests of shareholders first, not the public good or the good of the people. The government is therefore obliged to pay the national debt before it invests in its people or infrastructure.
The Power of the Bankers, excerpt from the Money Masters (9min 53):

The Bank of England
Under its Royal Charter, the Bank of England enjoys greater protection from scrutiny than the Ministry of Defence. It is also protected from disclosure and investigation by the Official Secrets Act and is immune from parliamentary scrutiny as MPs are not allowed to ask questions about the Bank in the House of Commons. The Bank was supposed to have been nationalised or taken into public ownership in 1946 but without giving the government any executive control of it. And in 1998, one of New Labour’s first initiatives, the Bank of England Act, gave the Bank’s Court of Directors complete independence with regard to monetary policy, allowing our elected representatives very little say over what the Bank does. As far back as 1844, the Bank of England formally took control of Britain’s money supply when the Bank Charter Act granted the Bank a monopoly over the production of Sterling. At least part of that legislation required the Bank to publish details of its own accounts and the amount of notes and coins flowing through the UK economy. Under New Labour’s 2009 Banking Act, the Bank is no longer required to tell ministers how much money is in circulation, confirming that the Bank, not the government is in charge of the nation's finances and, by extension, all government policy and action. It has enabled the Bank to embark upon 'quantitative easing', printing money to encourage us to spend our way out of recession. In practise, this has only served to devalue the currency and put us further into debt. The Bank of England has avoided public scrutiny by using corporate law and commercial confidentiality in the form of the Bank of England Nominees. In January 2010, the Bank of England confirmed when declining a freedom of information request that:


The Truth Manifesto

Information held by Bank of England Nominees Ltd is not subject to the FoI Act, as it is not a ‘public authority’ within the meaning of the FoI Act.
Letter from Stuart Allen, deputy secretary of the Bank to Kirsten Marsh, 15 January 2010

In other words, the Bank of England is primarily answerable to the shareholders of its subsidiary -- Bank of England Nominees Ltd – not to the government or the people. The above letter also confirmed that the Bank’s duty to its customers’ confidentiality over-rode any duty to openness or disclosure.

BoE Nominees
So who are these shareholders who can make and break governments through control of the money supply? In 1977 the Bank of England formed the Bank of England Nominees, (BoEN), a wholly owned subsidiary private limited company, no: 130747. Two of its 100 £1 shares were issued. According to its Articles of Incorporation, its objectives are:
To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….
Shareholdings Shareholdings (Disclosure) Hansard, House of Commons The Secretary of State has granted one exemption under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 in favour of Bank of England Nominees Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank of England. They will hold securities as nominee only on behalf of Heads of State and their immediate family, Governments, official bodies controlled or closely related to Governments, and international organisations formed by Governments or official bodies. They will in turn seek certain assurances from anyone in the eligible categories who wishes them to hold the securities as that person's nominee. These assurances are to cover (a) the fact that the person is the beneficial owner of the securities to be held by Bank of England Nominees Ltd.;

BoEN has never traded and has therefore only lodged un-audited accounts. Under the Companies Act 1976, limited companies are required to publicly list their shareholders . So couldn't we find out who the creditors are here? Well, no. In April 1977, BoEN became the only company ever to be given an exemption from this requirement. New Labour has confirmed that BoEN is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank of England, granted an exemption because:
it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.

(b) that the beneficial owner will not use his interest in any securities held by Bank of England Nominees Ltd. to influence the affairs of the company in which shares are held except as shareholders in general meetings of that company.

In practice, this means that we are not even allowed to know who acts as attorney for the creditors of the national debt -- the nominees -- let alone the actual creditors.

HC Deb 21 April 1977 vol 930 cc151-2W

In effect, this means the Bank of England was re-privatised in 1977 via the BoE Nominees Ltd. Although it is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, the BoEN’s secret shareholders – the nation’s creditors -- control the parent company.


Under banking laws, BoEN must work in the best interests of its shareholders, which is of course in direct contradiction to the public good. For example, the recent rise in the national debt has been enormously good news for its investors, who make their profit from interest on loans. The greater the loan, the greater the return to the shareholders. However that return is produced from the taxes of British workers. Higher debts mean higher taxes or less tax revenue invested in the country and its people. So the taxpayers have to work longer hours just to maintain the same standard of living. As we have already discussed, under New Labour those loans have gone from £350billion to around £900billion now and are projected to rise to £1.4trillion within the next parliament. Since the government is obliged under banking laws to meet this loan as its first priority, the shadowy creditors of the nation are in control of all government spending and by extension all government policy. So if you’ve ever wondered why the government can find £25billion to rescue the Royal Bank of Scotland -- of which £1billion went straight into the pockets of the banksters in the form of bonuses -- but not the mere £200million needed to keep open a steel works in Redcar – which actually produces something useful – now you have the answer. And this answer of course applies to other funding decisions, like the award of £3.5million to move the Dartington College of Art to Cornwall, depriving this constituency’s economy of an estimated £5million a year. As we all know, if you default on your loan repayment, the Bank will take off you what you offered as ‘security’ for the loan. In the case of a mortgage, this is your house. In the case of governments, you and your future earnings are the security for the loan, to be paid to the central bankers via government taxation.

Money and the Credit Crunch
Have you ever wondered why we are currently enduring a credit crunch recession? Because the banks have decided to restrict the supply of money to businesses and individuals. During a boom many people get themselves into more debt. The vibrant economic activity means that businesses borrow more for new technology to increase production to meet demand. People borrow more to buy a bigger house and a more expensive car because they are so confident for their economic prospects. Due to the laws of supply and demand, the cost of borrowing then goes up. Businesses cannot pay so many workers leading to lay offs while households find it harder to meet their costs. In many cases, they simply cannot afford to repay the loans, they go bankrupt and their assets – which have real value unlike the loan they gave you which was just figures on a computer screen – go to the bankers. This is why basic costs like housing are going through the roof. So where do the high street banks get the money to make these loans?


The Truth Manifesto

Fractional reserve banking
Each and every time a bank makes a loan, new bank credit is created – new deposits, brand new money
1934Graham F Towers, Governor, Bank of Canada, 1934-54

You may find this hard to believe but banks don’t lend money deposited with them by their customers: they just conjure up figures on a screen, which create credit in your bank account. And you’ll find it even harder to believe that every time you put a pound into a bank you are giving it the right to lend nine pounds it does not have. Under banking laws, financial institutions are required only to keep ten percent of monies due to them on deposit at any given time. This means that if you deposit £1,000, then the bank keeps £100 on deposit and uses the other £900 of your assets as security to back loans to other customers. After loaning that £900 out, the bank has £900 (plus interest) due to it in terms of future loan repayment. Ten percent or £90 of that £900 must remain on deposit under fractional reserve banking laws. However, the other £810 can then be used as collateral for still further loans. And so on.

Personal bonds
But loans and promises are not the only way to create fictitious money leading to debt and slavery. When you are born, the government raises a bond to the value of your estimated lifetime’s value as a productive worker. As with any loan, the monetary value of the bond is lifted out of thin air, more numbers in accounts on computer screens therefore more money -or rather more debt – in society. Because you have not claimed your bond, the government takes it as salvaged goods, uses it as collateral for the national debt and trades with it on the bond markets. However, you may be surprised you can in theory use this account to pay off your mortgage and pay your taxes.

Economists now believe that only three percent of the money in circulation is actual cash. The rest is just numbers on computer balance sheets. But it doesn’t have to be this way. Visionary leaders in the past have identified the problem – and its solution.


The bankers’ affect on their opponents
The real menace of our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over our city, state and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses, generally referred to as 'international bankers’
John F. Hylan, mayor of New York, 1911

We began planning the Revolutionary War in order to issue our own money again
Benjamin Franklin , founding father of the USA

No British Prime Minister has ever come close to paying off the national debt or taking control of the money supply. The fate of the following US presidents who have taken on the international bankers by taking control of the money supply has served only to discourage others.

Abraham Lincoln
Banking was conceived in iniquity, and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear. And, they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be the slaves of the bankers, and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money, and control credit
Abraham Lincoln

President Abraham Lincoln signed the Legal Tender Act of 1862 into law. It created the United States Note, the first government-issued paper currency in the Republic’s history. In 1865, John Wilkes Booth assassinated him at point blank range while Lincoln’s bodyguard was distracted. Booth never stood trial as Federal agents killed him in a shoot out.

On June 4, 1963, President John F Kennedy signed Executive Order No11110, which gave the federal government the authority to create United States Notes rather than Federal Reserve Notes. (The Fed is the US equivalent of the Bank of England).

As US Notes were backed by silver deposited in the US Treasury, it created a stable currency much more attractive to investors than the Federal Reserve notes which were – and still are -- backed by nothing. The US government issued notes until five months later… when Kennedy was assassinated. Officialdom blamed Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone gunman, for the attack but he never stood trial as he was also assassinated -- in the basement of the
Find out more about the assassination of JFK: Dark Legacy JFK takes on the bankers


The Truth Manifesto

Dallas police station.
JFK on the 'ruthless and monolithic conspiracy:

Andrew Jackson
In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson became the only leader in the history of Britain and the US to have effectively paid off the national debt (although it rapidly increased again as the result of a severe depression). In the midst of his battles with the privately owned Bank of the United States, he was subject to an assassination attempt by Richard Lawrence, who was later ruled to be criminally insane and a lone gunman. He never stood trial. In 1836 the Bank of the United States went out of business, prompting The Times of London to state:
'If that mischievous financial policy which had its origin in the North American Republic should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will […] pay off its debts and be without a debt. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. […] That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.'

James Abram Garfield
In his inaugural address in March 1881, James Garfield effectively declared war on the bankers who control societies via the money supply:
By the experience of commercial nations in all ages it has been found that gold and silver afford the only safe foundation for a monetary system

If the banksters were in any doubt of his intentions or of his understanding of their power, they couldn’t be after he famously remarked:
Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce[..] when you realise that the system is very easily controlled one way or another by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate

On July 2, 1881, just four months into his presidency, he was shot by Charles J Guiteau, who uttered the words ‘I did it and I want to be arrested!’ Guiteau was himself subject to two assassination attempts. Two months after being shot -- six months after his inauguration – Garfield died, making his tenure, at 200 days, the second shortest in United States history.

William McKinley
On 14th March 1900, President William McKinley signed the Gold Standard Act into law. It established gold as the only standard for redeeming paper money, curtailing the power of the bankers to simply create money at will. 23

Six months later, on 6th September 1901, McKinley was shot by Leon Czolgosz, said to be an anarchist, at a public engagement in Buffalo, New York. McKinley's doctors believed he would recover. On the morning of September 12, he felt strong enough to eat for the first time since the shooting but by the afternoon his condition had rapidly worsened. He died on September 14, 1901, eight days after he was shot, from gangrene surrounding his wounds. Czolgosz pleaded guilty to murder. At trial, he refused to speak to his defence lawyers or offer any explanation or defence. He was convicted and executed.

Some observations
All presidential assassins are supposed to have acted alone. In the cases of Kennedy and Lincoln the assassins themselves were assassinated before they could stand trial. Jackson’s would-be killer was declared mentally unfit to stand trial. In the cases of Garfield and McKinley, the two accused, it was alleged at their trials, were not fit to stand trial. In both cases, the assassins made no attempt to escape and seemed unconcerned they were on trial for capital offences (of which they were convicted, sentenced, then put to death). In both cases, the public nature of the assassination meant they were always going to be caught. In both cases, the shot president looked set to recover but then died suddenly.

Cui bono? Who benefits?
I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply
Rothschild, Nathan Rothschild, who cornered the British Stock Market after the Battle of Waterloo in 1815

When looking at the causes of the world’s problems we have to look at cui bono? Or who benefits from creating war, global government or narrowing the food supply. We have already seen that leaders of vastly different political persuasions – including Thomas Jefferson, Napoleon Bonaparte, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, John F Kennedy, and others -have identified the banksters as the cancer in our society. Louis T McFadden, who served as the chairman of the Congressional Banking and Currency Committee for more than ten years, stated that the international bankers were a:
dark crew of financial pirates who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket... They prey upon the people of these United States.

As we have already seen above, British governments of wildly different hues have been forced by their circumstances into plunging the UK into ever further debt, as was the case regarding the inception of the Bank of England in 1694 or as a result of ever more costly wars as in the case of the First and Second World Wars.


The Truth Manifesto

Although we are not formally allowed to know who owns the debt, recently emerging evidence points very firmly to the Rothschild family as the greatest beneficiaries of wars and revolutions through the Rothschild banking dynasty.

‘The City of London subsidises us’
The City of London produces absolutely nothing of real value. City banks invent money creation schemes like government bonds, mortgages, hedge funds, carbon credits trading and fractional reserve banking. The City banksters then either charge interest or levy other charges to make money from money, all of which is usury and is forbidden by law. They turn intrinsically worthless banknotes into hard assets by claiming the ‘security’ or collateral against which the loan was issued. If you default on your mortgage, the banksters take your house. The mortgage was credited to your bank account from thin air but your house has real value: it provides shelter and warmth. In the wider economy, the banks are robbing us blind then giving us a tiny proportion of that wealth back through taxation. The international bankers have already become rich on the back of our toil and our suffering, profiting from war and deception on a grand scale and making slaves of us all through debts run up as a result of war. Imagine what we could do with £43billion this year to invest in infrastructure, alternative energy, healthcare and education instead of handing it over as interest to the bankers, for doing little more than print pieces of paper. But all debt -- whether mortgages, credit cards or loans -- is an illusion created by the power elite, to make us think we are their slaves dutybound to settle our liabilities to them before we look after ourselves, our families and the wider interests of humanity. In reality, you can have £75 or goods worth £75 but you cannot have minus £75 or goods worth minus £75. So if you really want to see an end to suffering, exploitation and war, then support me in my efforts to end the national debt, write off all personal debt and introduce interest and debt-free currency. With the simple stroke of a pen, we would not just end war, poverty, pollution, starvation and exploitation but also bring to an end the causes of these blights on humanity. Any other measure would be a betrayal of future generations to a life of making the international bankers richer and yet more powerful.


The two biggest threats to our security of the last 20 years were both created by shadowy intelligence services supposedly tasked with protecting us
The Truth Manifesto

False-flag terrorism and manufactured war are keen arrows in the quiver of tactics the elite use to subjugate us: increasing debt and creating a climate of fear; literally destroying civilisations; mutilating men, women and children in some cases with white phosphorous and depleted uranium. Yet no one in parliament dares to question the events of that day as they use 9/11 and 7/7 to push through ever more severe measures to deal with so-called terrorists, which serve only to curtail our basic freedoms.

• Cancellation of the national debt will mean that there will be no more funding for war, false-flag terrorism or arms production and export. • Suing the Government under the Common Law to induce ministers to disclose: 1. its intelligence services funded Saddam and Al Qaeda, then created war and tyranny to combat them as part of its problem, reaction, solution strategy. any evidence of 9/11 and 7/7 being carried out by Muslims. any evidence of torture or other war crimes.

2. 3.

This will bring to an end the influence the military-industrial complex exerts over ministers, leading to a more just, peaceful and equitable society. • An immediate consequence will be withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. • The adoption of the Common Law will make all conflicts automatically unlawful. • The mass growing of hemp will put an end to the scarcity of clean fuel and nutritious food, ending two of the major causes of war.


The Truth Manifesto

Peace for our time
Because peace is not rocket science
The whole corrupt nature of the current system was recently demonstrated to me in the case of Bae Systems, the British arms producer, which paid hush money of around £286 million to avoid prosecution in open court. For what? We will never know. In no other area has the decay of the rule of law been so obvious than in the case of the illegal wars this country continues to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq. The last decade has shown that wars are fought for the benefit of the military-industrial complex, not for the benefit of our security, which has actually been eroded by the best efforts of armies, intelligence services and aggressive world leaders in their war on terror. Take for example the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, predicated on the need to defeat Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda yet both had been created through CIA funding. That’s right, the two biggest threats to our security of the last 20 years were both created by shadowy intelligence services supposedly tasked with protecting us. No other issue more clearly demonstrates the break down of the contract between the government and the people. When 2 million people marched to stop the war they were totally ignored by ministers who thought they knew better. This one event combined with the government reaction to it more than any other demonstrates that ministers in the Cabinet will do the bidding of their banking masters, no matter how many voters tell them it’s wrong. These ministers continue to do wrong, even when it has become absolutely clear that the policy isn’t working. The same has happened with 9/11. Despite protracted and intense lobbying on the part of the Truth movement, academics and specialist organisations like Architects for 9/11 Truth, ministers and MPs have simply failed to even take possession of the evidence.
8-year-old Razia from Kapisa province, Afghanistan, who was burned when a shell her father says was fired by Western troops exploded into their house, enveloping her head and neck in a blazing chemical. This boy has been blinded and horrifically scarred by white phosphorous. Gordon Brown has failed to condemn Israel’s use of the banned substance during the assault on Gaza in 2009 (below).


‘9/11 changed everything’
Despite our waging war in their countries on the back of 9/11, it is clear that Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with the events of that day. Nor did Al Qaeda. The story sold to us by the American government and swallowed whole by the mainstream has no basis in fact. Even the 9/11 commissioners now disown their report into the events of that day. Any cursory analysis shows that there simply isn’t any tested evidence to support the theory that 19 Muslim terrorists hijacked four planes and flew them into buildings. I’ve looked for the evidence but there are no forensic reports, no air crash investigations, no basic fact checking. Yet three days after the attacks, the FBI asserted that 19 Muslims were responsible. Many of the alleged hijackers have claimed to be still alive. Even if the official hypothesis regarding 9/11 were true, it would form no case for the wholescale invasions of those countries, which have been found to be illegal by a panel of Dutch judges. These wars pose an enormous toll on humanity. And can never be won. Not even Alexander the Great managed to quell the whole of Afghanistan. My painstaking research shows these wars are manufactured as part of a globalisation agenda, creating fear and repression and diverting precious resources to the prosecution of war. The false-flag terrorism of 9/11 is not the exception. It is the rule. I challenge my critics in this area to examine the evidence for themselves.

9/11 was an inside job
How can we say with such certainty that 9/11 was an inside job, carried out not by Muslim militants but by elements of the US government not loyal to the constitution? Well, it starts with the lack of timeliness and underfunding of the 9/11 Commission, goes through the obstruction of justice by various US Federal Agencies and ends with the 9/11 Commission chairman and vice chairman, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, distancing themselves from their 571 page report. In their book, Without Precedent, Kean and Hamilton explain how the commission was “set up to fail” from the start. In fact, then President George W Bush did not announce any enquiry until a staggering 419 days after the attack, when other official enquiries, including the investigation into the Kennedy assassination were set up within days. Any investigator will tell you time is of the essence when trying to establish the truth of the matter.


The Truth Manifesto

The whole fiasco takes us through: • • an absence of evidence where there should be plenty; videos and photo evidence, which have been exposed as obvious fabrication;

• •

recordings of mobile phone calls which just weren’t possible at the time; an abundance of witnesses who reported hearing explosions that day, which cannot be accounted for by the official hypothesis.

The lack of evidence
The official conspiracy theory outlined in the 9/11 Commission report is an hypothesis as opposed to a theory because the official story is just that, a story. It is not backed at all by any evidence which stands up to even the most cursory scrutiny because the evidence was simply not collected in the first place or does not exist at all. The 9/11 Commission failed to mention the collapse that day of WTC Building 7 in its final report. Or give any indication that the commissioners even knew that this 47-storey building had fallen at virtually freefall speed into its own footprint, that day. The following are some glaring examples of the absence of evidence: • Ground Zero, the scene of the biggest crime in history was not forensicated – itself a criminal offence on the part of the authorities even though no one has ever been charged in connection with this crime. • No air crash investigations were carried out, even though they are required by international law. • There are no CCTV images of the alleged hijackers at the airports where the planes were supposed to have taken off that day. • Even though the Pentagon has hundreds of CCTV cameras around it, only a handful of images of the impact exist, taken from two similar camera angles. None of the images clearly shows the object which hits the Pentagon, although the ‘vapour trail’ from the engines is captured. It is not a vapour trail from a plane. • Although the FBI claims to have identified those responsible, it remains an assertion with no basis in fact. At least six of the 19 named hijackers have since been reported to be alive. • Federal Aviation Administration records show that two of the planes allegedly involved, Flight11 and Flight77, did not take off that day.


• No blackboxes were recovered for any of the four flights. These are designed to withstand high speed impacts and raging fires and have transmitters so they can easily be found by investigators. • Authorities have claimed that one voice cockpit recorder was recovered, from Flight93, but it has never been subject to independent scrutiny.

Evidence which refutes the official story
As in the case of the alleged hijackers reported to be alive, evidence exists which directly contradicts the official story. In addition, this evidence existed before the 9/11 Commission was set up yet there is nothing in their report to show they were even aware of it, let alone interested in examining the veracity of it or its implications. The Commission simply accepted the FBI’s identification based on the fact that these Arab names appeared on the airline manifests or passenger lists and in the FBI’s database of terrorist suspects.

Academics, architects and pilots have formed their own 9/11 Truth groups based on their occupational expertise to point out many of the absurdities, impossibilities and mindless conjecture in the official hypothesis, which do not stand up to any expert or common sense scrutiny. In many areas the 9/11 Commission is expecting us to believe that the laws of science were suspended on that fateful day in New York. The following are just a few obvious observations: • Watching the footage of the collapse of the North and South Towers, it is patently obvious that the buildings are not being brought down purely by gravity. The Twin Towers came down in around ten seconds each -- and WTC7 in around six seconds - freefall speed allowing for air resistance. This means that none of the extant storeys offered any resistance to the falling storeys above. In other words, every joist attaching each of the 110 floors to the 236 outer columns and 47 inner columns had to break within a fraction of a second of each other. • No steel frame building has before or since 9/11 been brought down by fire. Airline fuel doesn’t get hot enough to even significantly weaken treated steel, let alone melt it. • Expert analysis of the evidence has shown that some form of controlled demolition is the only feasible cause of the collapse of each of the three towers. • Whatever went into the Pentagon made an 18’ circular hole in the


The Truth Manifesto

facade of the re-inforced building. According to pictures of the damage, the same object then passed through six layers of re-inforced concrete each one and a half feet thick. The nose of a commercial airliner is made of carbon.



9/11: WTC 7, the building that fell down, didn’t it?
Consider: Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC7 and the Towers, when “toppling-over” falls would require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan? And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? These questions suggest the need for further investigation.
Dr Steven Jones, Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?

Ryan’s estimate is that the probability that fires and damage (the “official theory”) could cause the Towers complete collapse is less than one in a trillion, and the probability is much less still when the complete collapse of WTC7 is included.
Ryan, Underwriters Laboratories employee, Kevin Ryan, quoted in Loose Change

Key Points
The 9/11 Commission didn’t take any evidence about or give any analysis of the collapse of the 47storey World Trade Centre 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers building WTC7 came down at freefall speed – allowing for air resistance -- collapsing in about 6.5 seconds, symmetrically into its own footprint, all the hallmarks of an induced demolition It is clear that the central column went first, also indicative of a planned collapse NIST has admitted its putative hypothesis that fires and exploding fuel tanks in the basement caused the collapse has ‘a low probability of occurrence’ or is highly unlikely It remains the only steel structure in history to allegedly be brought down by fire without being hit by a plane.

Did you know?
The BBC World Service reported the collapse of WTC 7 – and the causes of collapse – over twenty minutes before it ‘unexpectedly’ came down for no obvious reason? As did CNN. The owner of the WTC site – who won $4.4billion payout, after insuring the buildings against terrorist attack just a couple of months before – referred to Building 7 being ‘pulled’, an industry term for a controlled demolition. According to film footage on the day, police can be seen clearing the area around WTC 7 because, according to one officer, it is about to be collapsed. The building held offices for the CIA, the FBI, New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani’s Emergency Command bunker and files pertaining to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s major corporate fraud investigations, which were all lost. Researchers at the US National Institute for Standards and Technology admit that they only considered what happened up to the moment of collapse, denying them the opportunity to study the images of WTC7 actually collapsing (see below and see also Architects for 9/11 Truth’s analysis of the collapse of the North Tower to show that the Twin Towers were not brought down by fire and


The Truth Manifesto


Evidence of a pre-planned controlled demolition
At 21:54 GMT on 9/11/2001 the BBC announced that WTC 7 had collapsed. It was presented as fact, not as a ‘report of’ or ‘’sources have said that’. The BBC also gave the reasons for the collapse of a building which had yet to fall. At 22:20 GMT, some 26 minutes later WTC 7 actually collapsed.
The relevant bits: Watch the broadcast in full:

The BBC’s response
The BBC’s first response gave no detailed explanation. Head of news at BBC World, Richard Porter stated:
We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

Watch the broadcast. The reporter, Jane Standley, does not use these phrases. And how can they be so certain in these circumstances about the cause of collapse? In the second response, head of news at BBC World, Richard Porter stated:
there was a fairly consistent picture being painted of Building 7 in danger of collapse.

Although he quoted a CNN report as a source, in the footage in question, WTC7 has not yet collapsed, although the presenter is clearly expecting it to. Porter does not elaborate further.

Why were his alleged sources painting the picture of a building in imminent danger of collapse, when no steel structure has ever been brought down by fire? As a result of pressure from 9/11 Truth, the BBC was forced to investigate where the report had come from. At this point, Reuters admitted that it had come from their news service earlier in the day (see The BBC’s Conspiracy Files documentary, The Third Tower). 1st BBC response in full: 2nd response in full:

The Murdoch-owned Fox News reported the collapse of WTC 7 as fact, as well. In that broadcast, it comes down during the live report, much to the consternation of the presenters, who have already reported that WTC7 has collapsed. Again, they are also immediately certain about the cause of the collapse. Remember, no steel structure has ever been weakened enough by fire to simply fall down.
Watch the broadcast:


But then CNN had already reported a similar collapse – a building of about 50 storeys – which reportedly took place at about 10:45am New York time. Phoning in from Lower Manhattan, one of the station’s reporters, Allan Dodds Frank, gave a vivid report of a skyscraper collapse:
Just two or three minutes ago there was yet another collapse or explosion. I'm now out of sight, a Good Samaritan has taken me in on Duane Street. But at a quarter to 11, there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the second tower. And a firefighter who rushed by us estimated that 50 stories went down. The street filled with smoke. It was like a forest fire roaring down a canyon.

Since no other building went down that day, we have to wonder what Mr Dodds Frank was witnessing.

Collapse v controlled demolition

If you've seen many of the managed demolitions where they implode a building and they cause it to essentially to fall vertically because they cause all of the vertical columns to fail simultaneously, that's exactly what it looked like and that's what happened

Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was shown video of the collapse of WTC 7 for the first time by a Dutch television crew. He had no prior knowledge of the collapse of WTC7. After viewing the video, he was in no doubt that Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition: INTERVIEWER: Yes, you see the bottom floors go first. DANNY JOWENKO: Yes, the rest implodes. This is controlled demolition. INTERVIEWER: You're sure? DANNY JOWENKO: Absolutely, it's been imploded. This was a hired job. A team of experts did this. INTERVIEWER: But it also happened on September 11th. DANNY JOWENKO: The same day??? INTERVIEWER: The same day.
See clip:

Owner of WTC7 admits controlled demolition
The leaseholder of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, told the PBS documentary America Rebuilds:
I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it”. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
See clip:

We know that the term 'pull it' means to bring the building down by means of explosives because in the same documentary that Silverstein makes his ‘pull it’ comment, a cleanup worker refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6 when he says, "...we're getting ready to pull the building six." The term is industry jargon for planned demolition.


The Truth Manifesto

In 2006, Silverstein’s PR people issued a clarification of his comments:
In the afternoon of September 11, Mr Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein's statement is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7. Dr. Shyam Sunder, of the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST), which investigated the collapse of WTC 7, is quoted in Popular Mechanics (9/11: Debunking the Myths, March, 2005) as saying:
There was no firefighting in WTC 7.

The FEMA report on the collapses, from May, 2002, also says about the WTC 7 collapse:
no manual firefighting operations were taken by FDNY.

And an article by James Glanz in the New York Times on November 29, 2001 says about WTC 7:
By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons.

So it is clear that Silverstein’s PR people were lying to deflect attention from the fact that Silverstein had admitted that WTC7 was brought down by a controlled demolition. Even Dan Rather, commentating on the collapse live for CBS News said that it was:
reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.

It has also emerged that WTC7 was reinforced with extra steel in the early 1990s, making anything other than some form of induced demolition being the cause of the complete collapse even less likely:. Silverstein told the New York Times:
We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors

More than 375 tons of steel - requiring 12 miles of miles of welding – was to be installed to reinforce floors for Salomon's extra equipment, prompting one commentator to remark: ‘Essentially, Salomon is constructing a building within a building’.

Witnesses to explosions
It's blowin' boy. [Pause] Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon. The building is about to blow up, move it back. [Pause] Here we are walking back. There's a building, about to blow up...
See clip: 10-minute account with witness statements re explosions on 9/11:



Academic support for controlled demolition
In 2005, in a paper entitled Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse? Physicist and Archaeometrist Dr Steven E Jones concluded that it was far more likely that WTC7 was brought down by a controlled demolition:
I have called attention to glaring inadequacies in the “final” reports funded by the US government. I have also presented multiple evidences for an alternative hypothesis. In particular, the official theory lacks repeatability in that no actual models or buildings (before or since 9-11-01) have been observed to completely collapse due to the proposed fire-based mechanisms. On the other hand, hundreds of buildings have been completely and symmetrically demolished through the use of pre-positioned explosives. […] Evidence relating to WTC 7 and its mysterious collapse must not be held back. In particular, photos and analyses of the molten metal observed in the basements of both Towers and WTC7 need to be brought forth to the international community of scientists and engineers immediately.
Read the full paper: Excerpt from Painful Deceptions: Full analysis and archive on WTC7:

Implications of 9/11 being an inside job
‘9/11 changed everything’ has been used as an excuse for war and repression on a grand scale. Governments across the world have used it as an excuse for the following • • • • • • Imprisonment without trial Torture Other oppressive and authoritarian legislation Identity cards Increased surveillance Arbitrary arrest and detention for having placards, newspapers or Tshirts the government doesn’t like. • • • • More security checks More bureaucracy Increased debt The premise for illegal wars in the Middle East in order to control energy, build military bases and profit still further from the illicit drug trade, including the highest recorded opium crop in Afghanistan in 2007


The Truth Manifesto

White phosphorous, depleted uranium and cluster bombs used against civilians.

Those who claim 9/11 doesn’t matter have demonstrated a failure of courage; a failure of insight; but above all a failure of compassion: for those who continue to suffer wrongly and unjustly as a result of Muslims being blamed for 9/11. The events of 11 September 2001 have changed the hard-won fundamental values of civilisation – on the basis of a lie. Are you going to let Tony Blair, George Bush and the banksters get away this monumental fraud? Because if they get away with this, they and their successors can get away with anything. Those who are not doing everything within their power to expose the perpetrators of this evil help perpetuate it, help perpetuate the suffering of the innocent. Will you be able to face yourself in the mirror in the morning if you do nothing now while it is still possible? If you do nothing, if you let them get away with it, they will carry on staging terrorism and war, as the following historical examples attest.

Examples of manufactured war and false-flag terrorism
In the Money and Debt section, we showed how historically war has been used to increase the national debt and that leaders who challenged the bankers were subject to assassination by lone individuals who were either never tried because they were assassinated themselves or if they were tried offered little sane defence. Our current wars follow the same pattern. Predicated on oil, finance and banking, they are manufactured as part of a globalisation agenda. The false-flag terrorism of 9/11 is not the exception. It is the rule. There is clear evidence emerging from Freedom of Information requests in the US that: • The US intelligence services carried out terrorism in the 1950s and blamed it on the Iranian president, Mosadeq. • In 1967, President Lyndon Johnson was prepared to let the USS Liberty go down with full personnel on board in order to create a war between Israel and Egypt.


• In 1962, under Operation Northwoods, senior US military personnel planned to stage false-flag bombings and shootings on American soldiers and civilians in order to get public opinion behind an invasion of Cuba.

The Gulf of Tonkin incident on 4th August 1967 -- used as an excuse to escalate the Vietnam War -- did not happen.

I challenge my critics in this area to examine the incontrovertible evidence – all from official records -- for themselves. In addition, there is compelling evidence for other false-flag operations.

Operation Gladio
Nato forces in conjunction with the secret society, P2, planned and executed bombings, shootings and assassinations, then framed Italian left wing and communist groups. In Italy, on 3 August 1990, then-prime minister Giulio Andreotti testified to an Italian Senate sub-committee that a secret army, kmown as Gladio had been hidden within the Defense Ministry as a subsection of the military secret service, SISMI.

According to a document compiled by the Italian military secret service in 1959, the secret army had a two-fold strategic purpose: 1. to operate as a so-called “stay-behind” group in the case of a Soviet invasion and to carry out a guerrilla war in occupied territories; 2. to carry out domestic terrorist operations in case of “emergency situations”.

Watch the 1992 BBC documentary on Gladio: Read more:

The 1993 World Trade Centre Bombing
The following is a transcript of a conversation between Emad Salem, an FBI agent, and his FBI handlers:
If that's what you think guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau [the FBI] and the DA [District Attorney] and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Why hasn’t there been further official investigation into FBI complicity in making the bomb?
Read more:


The Truth Manifesto

The 1994 bombing of the Israeli Embassy in London
This incident has all the hallmarks of a false-flag operation (see Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers for a full account -- see also bombing of Israeli and Jewish targets in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994).

The 1995 Oklahoma bombing
The world’s media instantly and unanimously blamed Islamic terrorists for the attack until Timothy McVeigh, a former GI and right wing extremist, was arrested as the result of a routine traffic stop then connected to the attack by forensic evidence. Witness reports ignored by officialdom indicate more than one explosion and more than one bomber.

The 1996 MI6-funded assassination attempt on Colonel Qadhafi
MI6 funded associates of Osama Bin Laden to stage a coup in Libya which failed killing civilians (see Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers for a full account).

The so-called ‘suicide bombings’ in London on 7th July 2005
There has never been an official enquiry and therefore no objective examination of the government’s account of the worst terrorist atrocity on British soil. The official story – known as ‘the Home Office narrative’ --is just an hypothesis based on theoretical unsourced information, untested analysis and conjecture. In one key area, it is wrong. It claims that the men caught the 07:42 train from Luton that day, even though the rail operator has confirmed that that particular service was cancelled that day. The only CCTV image of the alleged bombers together, taken at Luton station at around 07:21 that morning has clearly been tampered with. This the only image released of the four alleged bombers together. Circled in yellow is an apparent discrepancy: the railing appears to pass in front of the arm. Faked images abound from the 9/11 attacks and photos of JFK’s alleged assassination Lee Harvey Oswald holding a gun are clear fakes. If it is a genuine CCTV image, the authorities will be able to release images of the four taken by another CCTV camera, the other side of the doorway


The authorities have refused to release another CCTV image of the four men allegedly taken at 08:26 that morning at Kings Cross Thameslink station (which the authorities initially claimed was taken at ‘Kings Cross station’, normally taken to mean the Mainline station, several minutes walk away). If the men really did use the transport network to take them to the scenes of the bombings, there should be an abundance of CCTV images tracking them across the transport network.
Read more:

The implications of false-flag terrorism
Now consider the consequences of allowing shadowy forces to rule the world through violence which can be manufactured any time -- perverting each and every truth-- in the interest of the power elite at the expense of the innocent. It is of course just an extra-ordinary co-incidence that the British Consulate and the headquarters of HSBC Bank were bombed in Istanbul on 20 November 2003, the day the peace movement had dominated a visit by then President George Bush to Tony Blair’s home constituency of Sedgefield. Just six months after the invasion of Iraq, the people’s vehement opposition to that war was about to dominate newspaper headlines, an enormous embarrassment to Blair and Bush and the New World Order. At the time, many questioned Al Qaeda’s ability to source bomb making materials and evade security controls in a country with such powerful and pervasive security forces. Just a co-incidence, right? In recent weeks, prosecutors in Turkey have arrested 35 ex-military figures on suspicion of involvement in the attacks as part of Operation Sledgehammer, a plan formulated by senior military figures to destabilise the country and trigger a military coup. The plot is also said to have involved plans to provoke Greece into shooting down a Turkish fighter jet. The Turkish military is part of Nato (see Operation Gladio – above).
Read more:


The Truth Manifesto

No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes
Line removed from UN draft report on climate change, 1996

There is no tested evidence to show that the planet is significantly heating up outside normal temperature variations or that sea levels are rising or that glaciers are melting at an unprecedented rate. Unscrupulous institutions, politicians and the mainstream media have tried to bamboozle us with either arbitrary graphs and photographic evidence or selective material which denies the bigger picture. The alleged cause of ‘global warming’, the main greenhouse gas, Carbon Dioxide or CO2, is essential to life on earth. It is not the cause of increased temperatures but is itself caused by them. The UN has hijacked the climate change issue to secure further global governance in the guise of monitoring individual nations’ carbon footprint. ‘Global warming’ distracts from the real dangers to our environment and health caused by the toxic fumes coming from car exhausts.

• • Come out of the UN. Source clean, renewable energy, prioritise food security and prepare communities to maximise self-sufficiency and sustainability. • Mass growing of hemp for nutrition for animals and humans, ending reliance on animal growth hormones and localising the food supply. • Carbon-neutral hemp oil to be adopted for fuel for homes and cars, replacing fossil fuels. New cars and buildings to be built from hemp. • Hemp to replace wood pulp in the making of paper, sparing 100,000s of acres of rainforest every year. Hemp to replace cotton as the main textile for clothes, potentially halving the use of pesticides on the planet which contaminate our environment and health. • Ending our reliance on expensive fossil fuels will end our dependence on the barbaric Middle Eastern regimes which produce them and on the military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan which is needed to protect their supply. It is claimed that this is a genuine image. Real or fake, it has been used to create alarm about melting glaciers and global warming.



It's time to examine science itself
Our environment is inextricably linked with our health, wealth and happiness. So it is not surprising that the powers-that-be have used science and the media to confuse and confound us in this area. In conjunction with public figures like former ‘next president of the USA’ Al Gore -- the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change has used its influence to peddle three myths: • • • The planet is significantly heating up Mankind is the main cause of this global warming Man-made global warming is causing catastrophic disruption to our environment and the species we share it with. For many years, it has been clear to reputable scientists that there is no evidence for man-made global warming partly because there is no evidence -which has stood up to scrutiny -- of protracted long term global warming itself. It is clear that rises in greenhouse gases like CO2 follows a rise in temperatures rather than being its cause. Any current rises are in keeping with fluctuating weather on the planet but the trend is towards global cooling. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. Top right: The graphs which Al Gore claimed in his ‘documentary’ An Inconvenient Truth demonstrated that CO2 causes global warming. When the graphs are correctly laid together it is clear that temperature rises cause CO2 concentrations to go up. Top left: Since Gore’s film came out, the trend has been towards global cooling. Above right: graph showing correlation between US postal charges and global warming! ch?v=tDOkTsyK6Iw

‘Climate change’ has become a convenient scapegoat for the ills of the world, used as a distraction from the very real problem of visible pollution, emerging from car exhausts and industrial waste pipes to blight our water and air. At the same time, the elite has hijacked the issue in the form of carbon taxes as part of its agenda to create an unaccountable world government and to push up the cost of everyday living through higher food prices.

Recently, it has emerged that pro-global warming scientists have been doctoring the data, on which their claims were based.


The Truth Manifesto

Graphs showing that there is an average 800 year lag between temperatures rising and CO2 levels increasing.

Ten myths about global warming exposed
MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate. FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. There has been no catastrophic warming recorded. Pro-global warming advocates have continually tried to play down the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ in order to exaggerate the extent of temperature variations from the norm in our age. Research published by 820 individual scientists from 487 separate research institutions in 43 different countries has provided more than enough evidence to confirm there was a medieval warm period. To check the evidence: MYTH 2: The “hockey stick” graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature increase for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase. FACT: Promoted by the UN’s IPCC and others, this graph ignores historical recorded climatic swing. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that. Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. Since the end of the 17th Century the “average global temperature” has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare. MYTH 3: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth. FACT: There is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. MYTH 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas. FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. Although CO2 is the most prevalent greenhouse gas, in total it constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. MYTH 5: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming. FACT: Computer models can be made to “verify” anything by changing some of the 5 million input parameters or any of a multitude of negative and positive feedbacks in the program used. They do not “prove” anything. MYTH 6: The UN has proven that man–made CO2 causes global warming. FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are: None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases. And Did you know? Over 31,000 scientists – nearly 10,000 of them with PhDs -- have signed a petition supporting the theory that increases in CO2 are actually good for the planet.


No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes Last year, a group of 54 noted physicists demanded the American Physical Society revise its position that the science of global warming was settled after both Nature and Science magazines refused to run an open letter from the physicists. Dr Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a UN climate report, dubs manmade warming “the worst scientific scandal in history.” Norway’s Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner for physics, decries it as the new religion: To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming. MYTH 7: CO2 is a pollutant. FACT: This is absolutely not true. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth. There is now an abundance of evidence to show a CO2-enriched atmosphere is actually good for plant development. MYTH 8: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes. FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. MYTH 9: Receding glaciers and the calving of ice shelves are proof of global warming. FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. MYTH 10: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.
In a period of enormous industrial growth and therefore increased CO2 output, the temperature trend was down, provoking fear of a new ice age

FACT: The earth is variable. Although the western Arctic may be getting warmer, the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder with ice thicknesses increasing. Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.
See more: Read more:

Energy and food
If the words 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness' don't include the right to experiment with your own consciousness, then the Declaration of Independence isn't worth the hemp it was written on
Terence McKenna, alternative scientist

You can have all the civil rights and supposed political freedoms you like but unless you source your own energy and food, you are not truly free (as Ukraine recently discovered when Russia turned off its gas supply to successfully combat dissent).

Pushed by the Greens, bio-fuels were meant to end our reliance on the alleged cause of ‘global warming’, fossil fuels. Yet the crops on which these bio fuels are based have eaten into land, which supplies grain for our food and animal feed. This has reduced the food supply and under the laws of supply and demand has pushed food prices through the roof or


The Truth Manifesto

led to poor-quality produce. (Much of the ‘fresh’ produce sold to us today has only twenty percent of the nutrients fresh food had thirty years ago). Yet one form of bio fuel is practical. It’s called hemp, better known as cannabis. Like trees, it can help balance the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. But it only takes four months to grow. It also returns nitrogen to the soil, vital for the growth of other crops and needs no pesticide or fertiliser. Because hemp grows like a weed it can largely be produced without eating into land already used to grow crops. Because of laws outlawing cannabis, hemp cultivation in the United Kingdom, is licensed by the Home Office under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Unless you are growing on the scale of agri-business, you are very unlikely to get a license. This only serves to restrict supply and therefore push up the price of hemp under the laws of supply and demand. It is also a rich source of perfectly balanced nutrition for everyone on the planet: 33% protein, vital to muscle strength and repair; rich in Omega 3,6 and 9, vital to cell repair and good mental health. As it grows just about everywhere people live, we have to wonder why 800million people on the planet are left to starve and 75 million of them left to die every year from hunger and malnutrition, when they could be feeding themselves with hemp.
A short documentary on hemp: Hemp: a Global Warming Solution by the USA Hemp Museum: The advantages of hemp biofuel:

Hemp facts
Read these facts, then weep because of the death, suffering and environmental damage caused by the illegalisation of hemp. In fact, the capitalism created by the banksters in the last quarter of the twentieth century could never have taken off if hemp/cannabis hadn’t been made illegal.
• • • • Over 25,000 products can be made from the hemp plant. Hemp has been grown for at least the last 12,000 years for textiles, paper, food and inspiration. Although native to China, it grows just about everywhere on the plant where humans live. In World War II, the US Army and US Department of Agriculture promoted the Hemp for Victory campaign – including a full documentary on the benefits of cultivating the plant.

The British Empire was built on the back of the hemp plant as it provided the material of the ‘canvas’ sails -- the word ‘canvas’ comes from ‘cannabis’; the fibre for the rigging; and the oil for the varnishes


and resins required to make the wooden ships seaworthy. As industrialisation took over, hemp oil was used to grease machines. In fact, most paints, resins, shellacs, and varnishes used to be made out of hemp and linseed oils. • As feral or wild hemp yields 300 gallons of oil an acre - far more than from canola or rape – it is a much more feasible and economic bio-fuel. Because it grows wild, it does not take up land needed to maintain the food supply. When mixed with lime, hemp hurds – the leftover bits after all the goodness and fibre has been extracted – petrify into ‘hempcrete’, a building material six times lighter and much more durable than concrete. Construction products such as medium density fibre board, oriented strand board, and even beams, studs and posts could be made out of hemp. Because of hemp's long fibres, the products will be stronger and/or lighter than those made from wood.
Hemp grows just about everywhere humans live

Hemp will yield 3-8 dry tons of fibre per acre, four times what an average forest can yield. It can therefore displace wood fibre, saving forests for watershed, wildlife habitat, recreation and oxygen production and carbon sequestration. Because of its low lignin content, hemp can be pulped using fewer chemicals than with wood. Its natural brightness can obviate the need to use chlorine bleach -- chlorine dioxide – a toxic byproduct of the paper industry and a major cause of polluted rivers. Hemp can be made into fine quality paper. The long fibres in hemp allow such paper to be recycled several times more than wood-based paper. Paper made from hemp fibre is preferred for bibles because it lasts a very long time and doesn't yellow. Hemp grows well in a variety of climates and soil types. It is naturally resistant to most pests, precluding the need for pesticides. It grows tightly spaced, out-competing any weeds, so herbicides are not necessary. It also leaves a field weed-free and the soil enriched with nitrogen increasing yields from subsequent crops . Hemp can be made in to a variety of high quality fabrics. Garments made of at least one-half hemp block the sun's UV rays more effectively than garments made from other fabrics. Hemp fabric is also thermodynamic: it keeps you cool in the heat and warm in the cold. Hemp fibres are longer, stronger, more absorbent and more mildewresistant than cotton. Hemp can displace cotton which is usually grown with massive amounts of chemicals harmful to people and the environment. 50% of all the world's pesticides are sprayed on cotton. Hemp oil is a proven sun-block cream, allowing the sun’s healthy rays through and screening out the damaging UV light.
Henry Ford’s hemp and sisal car, produced in the 1940s. Unlike steel bodywork, it did not dent when repeatedly hit with a mallet

• •

• •

In the 1940s, Henry Ford produced a car with bodywork largely made out of hemp which ran on hemp oil. Rudolph Diesel designed his original engine to run on hemp oil. BMW is currently using hemp materials in car interiors as part of an effort to make cars more recyclable and eco-friendly.

At a volume of 81%, hemp oil is the richest known source of polyunsaturated essential fatty acids, ‘good’ fats. It's quite high in some essential amino acids, including gamma linoleic acid (GLA), a very rare nutrient also found in mother's milk. Ever wondered: what was the mysterious ‘gruel’ that Oliver Twist insisted on more of? It was made of hemp seed meal. Today, hemp oil and seed are made into a variety of tasty and nutritional


The Truth Manifesto

products. • The main component of budgie seed is hemp. Since the hulled hemp nut provides 25% protein, it makes an excellent cheap animal feed, avoiding the need for growth hormones.

A word about THC-rich hemp or cannabis
Nearly all medicines have toxic, potentially lethal effects. But marijuana is not such a substance. There is no record in the extensive medical literature describing a proven, documented cannabis-induced fatality...Simply stated, researchers have been unable to give animals enough marijuana to induce death...In practical terms, marijuana cannot induce a lethal response as a result of drug-related toxicity...In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume...Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man
Young, US Drug Enforcement Agency Administrative Law Judge, FL Young, 1988

Of course, some have claimed that hemp should remain banned because it also provides cannabis which is smoked for its euphoria-inducing THC. Yet, despite shrieking media headlines, there is no tested evidence that cannabis causes any deterioration in mental or physical health (whereas peer-reviewed research has shown that drugs produced by the pharmaceutical industry induce all sorts of mental and physical health problems and are one of the main causes of preventable deaths). Anyway, try telling the mothers of the 800million starving in the world that they are not allowed to grow a crop to feed their starving children. Since there is no victim – or injured man -- in the so-called ‘crimes’ of cannabis possession, distribution and cultivation, under the Common Law, you have the right to grow, sell and consume as much cannabis as you want. So we have one plant which can wholly solve the problems said by the experts to be insoluble, yet it is illegal. To me, it is the final evidence of a co-ordinated agenda waged against humanity, rather than the result of any simple incompetence on the part of our leaders.


Good men will do good things. Bad men will do bad things. But to make good men do bad things it takes laws

Politicians are introducing thousands of new laws, monitoring our every move and spending our taxes on heavy surveillance in an everincreasing police state agenda.

Inform the people and the judiciary of our Common Law rights, which will allow us to opt out of UK plc and its statute laws whilst truly securing our rights to freedom and to hold property.

The rule of law is under attack as the police state agenda unfolds
Medical doctors have concluded that government scientist, Dr David Kelly, could not have committed suicide. Despite this and other well-founded reasons to believe he was assassinated, there has never been a formal inquest into his death under the rules of evidence, the normal procedure for dealing with suspicious deaths in England for over a thousand years.

Recently, the European Court of human rights ruled that police powers to randomly stop and search any individual were in breach of the European Convention yet the government has simply chosen to ignore it. In other words, ministers are telling police to break the law and collect private information on any individual. By the government’s own figures, stop and search has done little to prevent terrorism and much to invade the privacy of the innocent. A Dutch panel of judges recently found that the war in Iraq was illegal. Judges are now hearing criminal cases without juries. Since January 2007, when the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 came into force, ministers can amend any parliamentary legislation without consulting MPs.


The Truth Manifesto

Or declare a state of emergency without consultation under paragraph 1(4) (a) of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. Once declared, ministers will assume authoritarian powers.

To many, it is clear that the authorities are the real criminals, not just because they have prosecuted an illegal war or become involved in covering up torture but also because they have betrayed the country by trying to give sovereignty to the European Union under the Lisbon Treaty. The 1689 Declaration of Rights, the nearest thing we have to a constitution, makes it an offence to undermine our sovereignty, sedition, or give it to a foreign power, treason. Former policeman Albert Burgess has spent two years putting his case together against a variety of politicians and has recently got one constabulary to formally take possession of his evidence.
Read his evidence:

It is therefore clear that draconian authority, petty bureaucracy and corporate rights are replacing the rule of law, taking away any protection of the rights of the common man. I will be relying on another of our constitutional documents, Magna Carta, first signed in 1215, and its guarantee of Common Law rights -- particularly in the case of a corrupt and treasonous government:
I. FIRST, We have granted to God, and by this our present Charter have confirmed, [...] these Liberties under-written, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, of Us and our Heirs forever. XXIX. NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.

The Law of the land is the Common Law. It will be used to return the right of use of the land so those who want to can grow crops and feed themselves, freeing them of their reliance on the ever more indebted and exploitative system. And I will be using the election campaign to show the electorate other ways of avoiding authority’s incessant demands. You may be surprised to find, for example, that you are under no compulsion to pay your mortgage though as your mortgage is not a contract. This is partly because the bank only created the money you borrowed when you signed on the dotted line. Although you signed ‘an agreement’, the bank did not. Since your ‘agreement’ or ‘contract’ has no other party, you have only agreed with yourself that you will pay the mortgage. If you change your mind and no longer consent to pay the bank then the bank has no recourse to the courts or to your property.
Find out more about the Law and your rights at and


So why do we read about so many homes being repossessed? Because your solicitor does not tell you about these rights. His first duty is to the Law Society and its rules, not to his clients. In turn, the judge will not inform you of these rights – instead you consent to go through the trial process -- you consent by not saying ‘no’. However, the court ‘order’ or ruling which the judge produces does not bear his name or his signature. That’s right: eviction notices are not signed by the judge. As they are not signed, they have no validity (unless you consent by your silence to be removed from your home).

Your bond
When you are born, the government raises a bond to the value of your estimated lifetime’s value as a productive worker. As with any loan, the monetary value of the bond is lifted out of thin air, more numbers in accounts on computer screens therefore more money -- or rather more debt – in society. Because you have not claimed your bond, the government takes it as salvaged goods, uses it as collateral for the national debt and trades with it on the bond markets. However, you may be surprised you can use this account to pay off your mortgage and pay your taxes. Or get off those irritating but expensive parking and speeding fines.


The Truth Manifesto

‘Love thy neighbour as thyself’ ‘…and the Truth will set you free’
Ancient wisdom

So long as you respect the rights of others, the Truth is you are free under the Common Law The solution is in your heart: are you prepared to stand up for the Truth?
Like many, I am appalled by what is done in the name of religion: torture, suicide bombings and the wholesale repression of women. Like many, I believe it must be kept out of politics. Unlike many, I want to see the spiritual values of Truth, Honour and Integity at the heart of political life. True spirituality is about love and love of truth in particular, about individual responsibility for our actions, not pandering to groupthink. It is the key to better understanding ourselves and therefore changing the world for the better. It is a battle for hearts and minds, in which every voter has to answer to their conscience before putting a cross in the box. Given the frightening state of the world when you know the truth, it would be easy to lose hope. When we have needed inspiration and clear leadership, the political class has either shied away from even discussing higher values like love, or simply abandoning the pursuit of them, in the case of truth, justice, honour and integrity. consciousness-awakening

Love, Truth, Justice, Freedom, Peace
Yet the very lack of these key spiritual values in our leaders has led to: illegal wars in the Middle East costing millions of lives; seen depleted uranium, white phosphorous and cluster bombs maiming and killing civilians; information being obtained under torture -- abhorrent crimes against humanity, in which MPs and ministers are complicit. If however cabinet ministers had let ancient wisdom like ‘love your neighbour as yourself’ or ‘do as you would be done by’– known as the Golden Rule by sages across the millennia --


guide them then they would never have allowed these atrocities to have been committed. I will do all within my power to ensure they are never repeated, relying on this guiding ethic of the Common Law. I urge individuals to establish these truths for themselves then stand up for that truth rather than hide behind the groupthink of corporate culture, whether private or public, secular or non-secular. Laws, religions and committees have all become methods of conning us that someone, somewhere else is responsible. As a practitioner of Chinese medicine and acupuncture, I know that this all works on a day-today level. Spiritual dis-ease stems from the demands of modern life – the stress of making ends meet in a debt economy means we are no longer in harmony with the rhythms of God’s creation – then manifests as weakness and sickness in the human body. I therefore heal holistically, treating both body and spirit. Quantum physics is slowly establishing the science behind this and other ancient wisdom. Research by alternative scientists like Lynne McTaggart, Lloyd Pye, Dan Winter and Len Horowitz has laid out the evidence proving the power of meditation and prayer -- call it positive thought or better still, love – and the interconnectedness of everything. Films like The Secret and What the Bleep have shown ways we can harness this power. At the same time, evidence from a variety of sources points to 2012 being a time of enormous change for humanity and the world we live in, perhaps the End Times spoken of by many cultures. In this context, scientists are predicting that within the term of this coming parliament -- around September 2012 -- the earth will be hit by an enormous solar flare which may knock out all the electricity on the planet. Some are even predicting first contact with an extra-terrestrial race. Yet, none of the other parties have shown any interest in contingeny planning for what might be the biggest change humanity has ever witnessed.

Of course, no one can know exactly what will happen. But forewarned is forearmed. If elected MP for Totnes, I will ensure that we get the response right whatever comes at us, from whatever part of the universe.


The Truth Manifesto

The way forward
There is nothing impossible to he who will try
Alexander the Great (356 BC-323 BC)

The other parties cannot represent you because they are told by party bosses how to vote in parliament. The other parties all believe they can reduce the national debt -- even though no government has ever achieved this – committing your income to the bankers through taxation. Even if they got elected, how would the Greens fund alternative energy when they have to find £43 billion just to meet the interest for this year created out of the national debt? So I’m not here to tell you how bad it is. That is obvious to anyone paying attention over the last decade or taking in the contents of this research. I have come to provide a solution by returning your rights to you: • national personal. Cancel all debt, both national and personal. All debt raised at interest in unlawful. No other single policy will so free us individually and as a society, returning money to the creators of wealth – you – and stopping the banks in their tracks. • Localis Localisation. Return land use, politics, finance, trade and media to the people it effects at a local level. • Truth, Return Truth, Honour and Integrity to the heart of political life using the Common Law, Law bringing justice, freedom and prosperity to all. I want to bring to an end the Us and Them division which has allowed shadowy rulers to take away our rights. I will share my evidence and analysis of the world with the other candidates and the mainstream party leaders. I will challenge them on both a local and national level to refute the evidence I bring to the table. If they cannot, they will be obliged to accept that our view of the world is right: the shadowy forces of international banking, multi-national pharmaceutical companies, corrupt secret societies and the war and energy industries strategically exert enormous pressure on governments and other institutions to bend to their agenda, which deprives us of our rights, our well-being and the benefits of our labour. You will not of course read this in the mainstream media or hear our supposed representatives discuss it but that is because they have not considered the evidence for themselves. Why? They will have to answer that. And answer to their consciences if they continue to do nothing to expose this evil.


It will then be up to the conscience of each representative of the mainstream parties to honestly decide whether they can still promote policies which are unethical and unlawful and create injustice and suffering on a grand scale.


The Truth Manifesto

You choose to accept a Truth in the same way you choose to believe in God. It is a matter of free will. I cannot therefore make you change your cannot mind. You may choose not to believe the Truth that shadowy forces are waging a war humanity. doesn’ dirty war on humanity. That doesn’t right. mean you are right. And when this Truth inevitably emerges mainstream, into the mainstream, you will not be able to say that you did not know what was going on.