BASIC LAW HANDBOOK

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS AS A MAN/WOMB-MAN

BY DR. James Tucker-Bey INTERNATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE for HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENT

1

Why police only act after a crime occurs? 4. What is probable cause? 8. What is a sovereign? 10.CONTENT 1. What is Oath or Affirmation? 3. What are the elements of a lawful arrest? 7. What are standing orders? 5. What is a warrant? 9. What is a standing army? 6. What are my rights? 2. What happened to justice? 2 .

In His image created Him. And when government becomes destructive to these ends. that among these are life. What Commandment? ³And [God] said. liberty. That to secure these rights. but man and womb-man has forgotten those Commandments and tries to please the wishes of MAN instead. male and female created He them. Man and Womb-Man was given the only Commandments that is supposed to be Law on this planet. and the pursuit of happiness. respect each as you would want them to respect you. they are totally afraid of the government and the government agents/henchmen (police). Thomas Jefferson said that these rights are self-evident.´ Thomas Jefferson Remember. governments are created among men and derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. so [God] created man in His own image. Respect is earned not demanded. i.e. because the people of America today is so brainwashed. Genesis 1:26-28 The Creator gave Man the Liberty to have dominion over the things of the Earth 3 . let us make man in our image. and were endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. ³We hold these truths to be self-evident. What does that say for the people of America today? Not too much. that all men are created equal. Man has the Duty to love his neighbor as himself.What are my most basic rights as a living man/womb-man Man¶s most basic rights comes in the form of a Duty from the Creator. after our likeness and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the air and over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creapeth upon the earth.

The government makes accusations of violation of law 3. Man use words to trick and deceive other men into doing his biddings and give him nothing in return²slavery. What is Oath or Affirmation This is the sworn complaint of a civilian. and the enslavement of anyone not enlightened enough to avoid his pitfalls. Man created governments as a means to protect His rights and property among other men in a peaceful community. and must serve the alleged ³greater man´. that Man would rather be a Slave to another Man rather than be the Child of the Creator. What constitutes a Crime? For anything to be a crime there must be an Injury and/or damage to property with malice of forethought. The government makes the law 2. Why must it come from a civilian? Because there is a HUGE conflict of interest if 1. but men in positions of power have change the mission and scope of government for self enrichment. Below are the things that one Man abuse to enslave another Man into believing that he is less of a Man than was created by the Creator. it is the accusation of wrong-doing. but Man has gotten so lazy and disobedient. not an accident.and to sojourn with Him over the Earth. The government licensed attorney speaks for you in court (enslavement) 4 .

and transported ³beyond the seas to be tried for pretend offences by the British Government. because of Standing Orders to do so. There being no originator of the complaint. (Do you see the similarity to an occupying police force who have standing orders to arrest violators of the State¶s Statutes?) Today. JOE SMITH as if to imply that even though the courts are acting without the complaint of just ONE civilian.´ Why Police Only Act After a Crime Occurs 5 . most police and judicial actions are ³not´ initiated by the complaint of a civilian. It was common in those days that there was no civilian complaint. To cover up for this fact.e. (sounds familiar?) The Founders of the Colonial united States made this requirement of the Sworn Complaint of a civilian as insurance against tyranny. arrested. they are somehow representing the interest of ³all the people. the people were often arrested for ³Violation of the Kings Law´ by the Kings Standing Army.4. What is a pretend accusation? One could only guest. and there is no victim. ³Failure to pay the Tea Tax´ where the government is the plaintiff/complainant. i. The government keeps your money The design of the United States Government as described by the Constitution made it quite clear that the designers intended the people to be in control and the beneficiary of each step of the way. In the days before the Constitution was written. most court summons or indictments are listed as THE PEOPLE vs. the Colonists were being accused. The government judges/courts find you guilty 5.

´ or ³Restraint before Injury´. Yes. The role of the police as agents of the government is only ³CRIME PREVENTION. they will refuse to take a person into custody until that person commits a crime (causes injury). which the Supreme Court has decided (in many decisions regarding free speech and free assembly) to be Unconstitutional.This is exactly what we should expect! If the Government (police) act BEFORE there is a crime. this is known as ³prior Restraint. and is non-specific as to the name of the accused. Note that a standing order is made at some time prior to the event. 6 . Police Forces. What Are ³Standing Orders´? All Military Troops. even the police know this! Often times when called to a scene. Police are not clairvoyant and they don¶t have crystal balls to tell the future. and these orders come in 2 varieties: Direct Orders (³You go do this now!´) and Standing Orders. A Standing Order is a ³general order´ to be followed if some condition comes into existence in the future.´ At least that¶s what the street patrols are designed to do. how can the police know that a crime will occur (in the future). Besides. perhaps a domestic dispute. etc follow the orders of their commanders.

JOE R. It is used by a Police commander to his troops. etc. it is general and non-specific (it does not name the accused) and is made before the event. The organizers of the American Colonies were very much opposed to this kind of discretionary power being placed in hands of ANY one person (and is evident by the general design of the Federal Government. it is specific as to who is to be arrested.e. Police Officers today generally have (or think they have) standing orders to detain. the distribution of power across 3 branches. The complaint is initiated by a civilian. why.´ This is a Direct Order. the abuse against the people are the same. Do you know the 2 elements of the Fourth Amendment that is intended to prevent Standing Orders from being executed against the people? The first is the ³Oath 7 . The Colonists understood this form of tyranny (police state) because it was levied against them by the Armies of Great Britain. 123 MAIN STREET. It is a specific Warrant. it comes after the event. the system of checks and balances. HE IS ACCUSED OF ROBBING HIS NEIGHBOR MS JANE DECENT. BLOW. Today the conditions are similar. and in anticipation of the event. ³ARREST ANYONE YOU SEE JAYWALKING!´ «is a standing order. SHE HAS SIGNED A SWORN COMPLAINT AGAINST HIM. however while it isn¶t a foreign army that occupies us.i. search and/or arrest those they feel violated a law. It names the accused and the crime. and it is reactive. A Police Lieutenant gives a piece of paper to two officers with the following explanation: ³ARREST MR.

this also removes the arbitrary discretion from the officer. + Most Police actions in America lack Probable Cause. political pundits. and even college textbooks will argue why this is necessary so. The lawyers. The Fourth Amendment requires both specific Warrants and that the complaint be initiated by a civilian. If the complaint MUST ALWAYS come from a civilian (i.and Affirmation. If ALL arrest/search/seizures are documented with the specific justifications of the action (warrant).e. when the police arrest someone. corporate owned free press. and provides the needed checks and balances. not the government. not the arresting authority) this eliminates the invocation of general and standing orders (and a big conflict of interest). and not self-directed. and rarely is there ³oath or affirmation´ of a complaining civilian. and thus prohibits the police from executing ³Standing Orders´ against the people. and ensures that the Police Force is ³reactive´. thus + Most Police actions in America are Unconstitutional. Both are intended to remove the discretion of arrest/search/seizure from the arresting officer. What Is A ³Standing Army´? 8 . but the simple fact remains: + Most police actions in America lack a injured victim (except for perhaps the accused). thus + Most Police actions in America lack a valid Warrant. However in modern America. and the second is that warrants must be specific. there is rarely a specific warrant.´ a sworn civilian complaint. (see the Communist Manifesto).

A Standing Army that lives among the citizenry is most likely to be used against the citizenry. such as the threat of invasion. without the Consent of Congress. Marshall Law. county. This condition was recognized by the Organizers of the Colonies as perhaps the greatest single threat to the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. Section 10 A Standing Army (or police) with Standing Orders define a Police State. our Municipal. This is generally called the µMilitia¶. Article 1. ³No State shall. Our present system demonstrates this. and reduce them to slavery. city. ± Luther Martin. Because none of the Founding Documents mention the word ³police´.When a government wishes to deprive its citizens of freedom. or military rule. or Ships of War in time of Peace. it generally makes use of a standing army. and State Police fit this description of a Standing Army. Maryland delegate to the Constitutional Convention ± An Army (an armed force) can be called up by volunteers from the community as needed when there is some threat. But a Standing Army is a paid. What Are The Elements Of A Lawful Arrest? 9 . The Organizers of the Colonies are on record for opposing the abuses of Standing Armies.´ United States Constitution. armed military force that exists before there is any threat. «keep Troops.

and particularly describing the place to be searched. and the persons or things to be seized. supported by Oath or affirmation. 3: A document issued describing what is to be searched.) This means. here is what usually happens: 10 . and effects. and that the injury was probably caused by "criminal intent". that is. the elements are as follows: 1: Oath or Affirmation made 2: Probable Cause determined 3: Specific Warrant issued 4: The actual arrest/search/seizure/detainment (NOTE: the ordering is important! 1 and 2 should happen before 3. against unreasonable searches and seizures." Perhaps you should memorize it! So. but upon probable cause. and 3 before 4.For your reference: here is the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons. 4: The actual arrest/search/seizure/detainment Yet today. shall not be violated. and why. in common language: 1: A civilian makes a complaint 2: Evidence is found linking the accused with the victim's injury. according the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. or who/what is to be seized/arrested. papers. it was not an accident. houses. and no Warrants shall issue.

Can you name the crime in. then the most common usage wouldn't make sense! Make the replacement in the above phrase: "The officer had *a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed* to believe that the person had violated a law. it is not adequate. as we will soon see." While this is close." (A strange phrase commonly heard on television. smoking weed/crack cocaine. running a red light/stop sign." 11 . 3: There is no Warrant issued. thus there can be no Probable Cause. 4: The Police Officer executes a standing order to detain/search/arrest someone for a victimless "pretended offence". etc. speeding. and in law dictionaries and college textbooks) Probable cause is NOT a simple synonym for "reason". DUI. yet this is how it is used most often. seen in newspapers. prostitution. pay taxes. If this *were* the definition..1: There is no complaint from a civilian. Law dictionaries often define Probable Cause as "A reasonable belief that a crime has been committed. 2: There is no injury.. What Is Probable Cause? "The officer had *probable cause* to believe that the person had violated a law.

and people going to jail for absurd things like "possessing forbidden flowers".. if "probable cause" is simply "reason to believe a crime has occurred"..com/Writings/Stories/TheRules/fallacy. there is a common misunderstanding as to the definition of "crime". because they were *defining* the law! They obviously meant something different. Also. We must all *begin* with an agreement of what is a crime BEFORE we codify the Law. and law is "that which is crime". given the number of obscure "laws" on the books that the people are subject to. Anyone who has studied logic will tell you that this has no meaning at all. begging the question. Hmmm. (see any logic text. law or crime? If crime is "things which the law prohibits". let's come up with a USEFUL definition of crime: The body of a crime (Corpus Delicti) must have 2 components [from Gifis]: 1: An injury 2: A criminal cause 12 .. we have self-reference.Huh? Something is wrong here.. a circular reference. then it offers the people little protection against harassment. Such a definition would give the police wide powers to detain just about anybody for any reason at any time.wdv. "having a bad opinion about the court" or "talking about doing something really nasty". legislature.html) The Founding Fathers wrote *probable cause* and not "reason to believe that a violation of the law occurred". or else we end up with a meaningless law that refers to itself. Now.) So. a tautology. Many people think that a crime is a "violation of the law". (Wait! That IS what we have today. or: http://www. corruption of the courts.. "not having proper paperwork". but this is a circular definition! Which came first. and the police.

A crime is an injury caused by criminal agency (not an accident or act-of-god). But here is the *really* important thing to remember: If there is NO VICTIM. for example. and we have the following: PROBABLE CAUSE *IS*: "REASON TO BELIEVE THAT AN *INJURY HAD CRIMINAL CAUSE*" So if a civilian makes a complaint. Now replace this in the dictionary definition. an injury. Finally! Now that we know what *probable cause* really is. then we have met the Constitutional requirement. can reasonably assert: "The accused PROBABLY CAUSED the injury to the victim". thus it should be shown that the injury was intentional and malicious. there can be NO PROBABLE CAUSE. since a "cause" is a claim. now we can define what is required to show or determine probable cause: PROBABLE CAUSE *REQUIRES*: "CERTAIN FACTS LINKING THE ACCUSED WITH THE VICTIM'S INJURY". and a body of the people such as the Grand Jury. Someone can get hurt from a falling meteorite: not a crime. (It could alternately be interpreted as "Probable Cause of Action". certain human-caused injury may be simple accident. but it is no different. and a petition for restitution). There is really more to it than this. Most police detainments in the United States these days 13 . and the origin of the phrase becomes clear. You can injure someone accidentally: not a crime. and a claim requires a right. Someone causes an injury intentionally: *this* is true crime. or the "victim" has suffered NO INJURY.

and are thus. Imagine a world where a Warrant is not needed! If there is no Warrant to arrest. you see! The courts have approved it" (which. reason". expired tags. We often hear today of the multitude of conditions under which a warrantless search or arrest can happen. All proper arrests. Think: "He PROBABLY CAUSED the Injury to the Victim". then there is no proof of a valid reason to arrest. The Warrant describes exactly what is to be searched. by the way. and searching 14 . no seat belt. In the absence of any injury. WHAT RUBBISH! A Warrant is more than a piece of paper. safety checks. etc. un-Constitutional. usually described in a document. is the same court that makes a "fine" profit when you are found guilty of the charges). which exists *PRIOR to the arrest*. searches. seizures need this in order to be valid (except perhaps for some extremely rare circumstances). If there is no Warrant for arrest. nothing would prevent the Occupying Force from setting up blockades. "It's OK. there is no "just reason" for arrest.begin as traffic "offences" (there is no offended party): speeding. these all lack Probable Cause. What Is A Warrant? A justification or reason to arrest/search/seize. In such a system. having the Warrant issued by a judge is like putting the wolf in charge of protecting the sheep!) Look up the word in any dictionary. (And under the present system. Warrant means "justification. There is no just action. or who/what is to be seized (and why!).

Also.every ship (or automobile!). Note that the officer often obtains a "consent to search" by asking. and taking/impounding/stealing anything they please. or through representatives chosen by the people. and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. either directly. This common event today is what the Founders were trying to prevent by the Fourth Amendment requirement of a specific warrant. have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property." Benjamin Franklin once quipped: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. What Is A Sovereign? James Madison. etc. p. because of fear of the consequences. Sixth ed. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested* in the people and are exercised by the people. perform the search. but it is very much in violation of the spirit of it. to whom those powers are specially delegated. 695] 15 . Further violations of the spirit of the Constitution: having a dog or x-ray instruments." [Black's Law Dictionary. many people feel that not consenting to a search implies guilt.. "Do you mind if I search your car?" This may appear to waive the Constitutional requirement for a Warrant." "Republican government. etc. the "the Father of the Constitution". stated: "Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. Requiring "implied consent to search" in order to obtain a Driver's License. Many people feel coerced into consenting.

judges.. This phenomenon is the direct result of people no longer taking the viewpoint of being Sovereigns. sheriff). Lincoln also stated: "The people are the masters of both Congress and courts. not in "We the People" as individuals. that is. for the people". but one can demonstrate the workability of this principle in real life. What does the master of the house do when he has a disobedient servant? He fires him. This may sound all very simplistic and theoretical.e. unalienable Rights and our sovereignty. sometimes people exercise their powers of sovereignty directly when they make a citizen's arrest. sheriff) to make arrests for them." "We the People" are the Sovereigns because sovereignty is vested in the citizens. politician. The only reason a servant can usurp the authority of the master of the house is if the master lets him (i. The people often allow corrupt politicians to usurp* constitutional Rights. a king or other ruler in a monarchy. people can also choose to act through a representative by electing a civil servant (e. Abraham Lincoln reminded people repeatedly of these basic founding principles--a country "of the people. Therefore. or state in which independent and supreme authority is vested. but to overthrow the men who pervert it!" Yes. The servants have taken over the house.g. by the people. as I and many others have done. of being the masters of the house. a chief ruler with supreme power. Furthermore. acquiescence or consent to the usurpation).e. the people are the masters and the politicians are the servants. doesn't he? Today most people are afraid to stand up to their public/civil servants. not in their (civil) servants (i. not to overthrow the Constitution. attorneys. On the other hand. individual citizens have the authority to choose whether to exercise their powers of sovereignty either 1) directly or 2) through representatives. For example.Black's Law Dictionary defines a "Sovereign" as: "A person.. 16 . body. to turn the tide of corruption all one needs to do is to assume the viewpoint of a Sovereign and exercise the Rights of a Sovereign. Little by little from the time of the founding of our county people have been programmed to believe that politicians are the "leaders" and that sovereignty is vested in them.

The alleged Black People/Afro-American (Indigenous People of the Olmec Dynasty). 17 . rights. What happened to Justice in America? The people went to sleep and never woke up. Sixth Edition] * usurp: To seize and hold any office by force. Hosea 4:6 The people of America seek everything except the true Law of Nature. I also will forget your children. powers.* vested: "Fixed. Man is not interested in the Laws of Allah. mere expectancy of future benefits. accrued. has become property of some particular person or persons as present interest. and without right. Only the Creator has authority over His creation." [Black's Law Dictionary. there has been no justice in the Western Hemisphere. complete. settled. All original (Indigenous. functions. Indian [Olmec. or contingent interest in property founded on anticipated continuance of existing laws. I reject you from being a priest to me. only the things of the flesh. Rights are "vested" when right to enjoyment. present or prospective. has not had anything close to justice since 1493. not subject to be defeated by a condition precedent. to be tread on by anyone in public office. What Happened To Justice? My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. place. applied to seizure of office. absolute. [Black's Law Dictionary. etc. no one else. Sixth Edition] Are you the Master (Sovereign). Having the character or given the rights of absolute ownership. not contingent. No Man/Womb-Man in public office have any authority over you for any reason. And since you have forgotten the law of your God. of another. because you have rejected knowledge. Since the landing of the Muurs and the Whiteman from the European Continent. or are you the Slave. does not constitute "vested right.

All Peoples of the Western Hemisphere [United States. colored. Canada. or statement by the Vatican. 1493. that has never been rescinded. repealed. or superseded by any other bull. misplaced. Mexico. 18 . South America. etheopian. Aztec.e. the Peoples of the Western Hemisphere has lost. rule. These terms don¶t in any way identify a culture. West Indies. Venezuela. Panama. Alaska. latino. black. Costa Rica. or natural peoples on the Earth. negro. and false standings in the Heritage of the original peoples of the Earth. hispanic. false tales of valor. and many others. and Inca]) peoples of the Western Hemisphere has been enslaved by the authority of the Catholic Church by the Bull-Inter-Catera by Pope Alexander VI of May 4. afro-american. dynasty.Mayans. Cuba. order. removed. When given a chance to identify with other peoples of the World. Jamaica. african ±american. Central America. and have had stolen their true cultural identity that has been misplaced by lies. Hawaii. Haiti and all other land mass] are called by µpet names¶ i.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.