This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

Scribd Selects Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

P. 1

Aircraft Performance Full Version|Views: 48|Likes: 2

Published by Bharadwaj Karthik

See more

See less

https://www.scribd.com/doc/54657646/Aircraft-Performance-Full-Version

02/04/2013

text

original

1. Cruise Flight

1.1 Equations of Motion

Flying airplanes spend most of the time in cruise ﬂight. It is therefore an important part of the ﬂight. To

learn more about the cruise ﬂight, we look at the forces acting on the aircraft during a steady symmetrical

ﬂight. These forces, the thrust T, the drag D, the weight W and the lift L are shown in ﬁgure 1.1.

Figure 1.1: Forces acting on the aircraft.

Per deﬁnition the weight points downward, the lift is perpendicular to the velocity vector and the drag

is parallel to the velocity vector. We also assume that the thrust points in the direction of the velocity,

so the thrust angle of attack α

t

= 0. Other angles are the ﬂight path angle γ, the angle of attack

α and the pitch angle θ.

We now use Newton’s second law, F = ma. Looking in the direction parallel to the velocity will give

W

g

dV

dt

= T −D −W sin γ. (1.1.1)

Looking in the direction perpendicular to the velocity will give

W

g

V

dγ

dt

= L −W cos γ. (1.1.2)

Furthermore, we have two kinematic equations, being

ds

dt

= V cos γ and

dH

dt

= V sin γ. (1.1.3)

A cruise ﬂight is a quasi-stationary ﬂight, meaning that at any given point you can assume the ﬂight

is stationary. However, you can not assume that the entire ﬂight is stationary. In fact, the weight of the

aircraft decreases during ﬂight, according to

dW

dt

= −F(V, H, Γ), (1.1.4)

where F is the fuel ﬂow, which depends on the velocity V , the height H and the engine setting Γ. Cruise

ﬂights are usually steady horizontal ﬂights. Steady ﬂight implies that dV/dt = 0. Horizontal ﬂight

means that γ = 0. Combining this with the equations of motion gives

T = D and L = W. (1.1.5)

1

1.2 Cruise Flight Strategy

During the cruise ﬂight you want to use as few fuel as possible. If you want to stay as long in the air as

possible, you should maximize the endurance. The endurance E is the time which you can stay in the

air with a given amount of fuel. To maximize E you should minimize the fuel ﬂow F.

If, however, you want to go as far as possible, you should maximize the range. The range R is the

distance you can cover with a given amount of fuel. So the distance ds per weight of fuel used dW

f

should be maximized. So we need to maximize

ds

dW

f

=

ds/dt

dW

f

/dt

=

V

F

. (1.2.1)

For jet engines we can assume that the fuel ﬂow varies linearly with the thrust, so F = c

T

T = c

T

D,

where the constant term c

T

is the speciﬁc fuel consumption. Also, from the deﬁnition of the lift and

drag coeﬃcient follows that D/C

D

= L/C

L

= W/C

L

. Combining all this gives

V

F

=

V

c

T

D

=

V

c

T

W

C

L

C

D

=

1

SWc

2

T

2

ρ

C

L

C

2

D

. (1.2.2)

So to increase the range we should decrease ρ. That is simple. We should ﬂy as high as possible.

Now let’s consider we’re ﬂying at a given altitude (and thus constant density ρ). We need to maximize

C

L

/C

2

D

. Diﬀerentiating this fraction by using C

D

= C

D0

+

C

2

L

πAe

will show that C

L

/C

2

D

is minimal if

C

L

=

1

3

C

D0

πAe. (1.2.3)

So we now have suﬃcient data to determine our strategy. We should ﬂy as high as possible and choose

our V such that V/F is at a maximum.

But what if the determined velocity V with which we need to ﬂy is beyond a speed limit of our aircraft?

In that case we should ﬂy at the speed limit, so V = V

lim

. It now is important to minimize the drag D.

Minimum drag occurs if C

L

/C

D

is maximal, resulting in a lift coeﬃcient of C

L

=

C

D0

πAe. We also

need to choose our height H (and thus the density ρ) such that the drag D is minimal. This occurs if

ρ

opt

=

W

S

2

V

2

lim

1

C

L

. (1.2.4)

1.3 Finding the Range

Now we are curious, what will the range be if we ﬂy in this optimal condition? To ﬁnd an equation for

the range, we ﬁrst express the distance traveled ds as a function of the change in weight dW according

to

F = −

dW

dt

= −

dW

ds

ds

dt

= −

dW

ds

V ⇒ ds = −

V

F

dW. (1.3.1)

The range can now be found by integration. To get a meaningful result, we make a change-of-variable

according to the above relation. So the range is

R =

s1

s0

ds =

W1

W0

−

V

F

dW = −

V

c

T

C

L

C

D

W1

W0

1

W

dW =

V

c

T

C

L

C

D

ln

W

0

W

1

, (1.3.2)

where W

0

is the initial mass of the aircraft and W

1

the ﬁnal mass. The above equation is called the

equation of Breguet. We will examine it more closely at the end of this chapter.

2

1.4 Optimum Cruise Condition

We have determined how to ﬂy as optimal as possible at a given point. But as we continue ﬂying our

weight W decreases and we’re not ﬂying optimal anymore. What should we do? We can consider several

ﬂying strategies and then select the best.

1. Keep constant engine settings Γ and height H. Although the velocity V will increase, the factor

V/F will be far below optimal during the rest of the ﬂight.

2. Keep constant velocity V and height H. This time the factor V/F will be better, but it will still

be below optimal.

3. Keep constant angle of attack α and height H. Doing this will result in the optimal V/F during

ﬂight. However, the velocity V will decrease, which is unwanted if we want to get somewhere fast.

4. Keep constant angle of attack α and velocity V . The value of V/F will still remain optimal. The

height at which we are ﬂying increases during ﬂight. This is usually considered the best strategy.

So the conclusion is that it is best to ﬂy at a constant velocity V and angle of attack α with a slightly

positive ﬂight path angle γ.

1.5 Propeller Aircrafts

The previous paragraphs were all about jet aircrafts. Now let’s brieﬂy consider propeller aircrafts. There

is a fundamental diﬀerence between these two aircrafts. For jet aircrafts the fuel consumption is approxi-

mately proportional to the thrust. For propeller aircrafts the fuel consumption is more or less proportional

to the power P

br

of the engine. So

F = c

p

P

br

=

c

p

η

p

P

a

=

c

p

η

p

TV, (1.5.1)

where η

p

is the propulsive eﬃciency. The factor V/F, which is so important for the range, now becomes

V

F

=

η

p

c

p

C

L

C

D

1

W

. (1.5.2)

Deriving the equation of Breguet for propeller aircrafts will then give

R =

η

p

c

p

C

L

C

D

ln

W

0

W

1

. (1.5.3)

This looks rather similar to the equation of the range for jet aircrafts. This can be illustrated further if

we look at the eﬃciency of both engines. The total eﬃciency of a propeller aircraft is

η

tot

=

P

out

P

in

=

TV

H

F

g

=

η

p

c

p

g

H

, (1.5.4)

where H is the speciﬁc energy of the fuel in J/kg. The total eﬃciency of a jet aircraft is

η

tot

=

P

out

P

in

=

TV

H

F

g

=

V

c

T

g

H

, (1.5.5)

Filling this in in Breguet’s equation will give the same result for both types of aircraft, being

R =

H

g

η

tot

C

L

C

D

ln

W

0

W

1

. (1.5.6)

The factor H/g is a measure of the fuel quality. The factor η

tot

indicates the quality of the propulsion

system. The factor C

L

/C

D

shows the aerodynamic quality. And ﬁnally the fraction W

0

/W

1

indicates

the quality of the structure of the aircraft. So the conclusion is simple: Well-designed aircrafts ﬂy further

with less fuel.

3

2. Take-Oﬀ

2.1 The Procedure

Aircrafts usually ﬂy. But before they can ﬂy, they ﬁrst have to take oﬀ from the ground. There are

several moments during the take-oﬀ run that deserve some special attention. We now take a close look at

the lift-oﬀ procedure of a multi-engined jet aircraft. The take-oﬀ procedure for other airplanes is similar.

Before take-oﬀ, the airplane taxis to the start of the runway. At that moment its velocity is V

0

= 0.

When clearance is given by the control tower, the pilot gives the engines maximum power. At a certain

velocity V

dec

, called the decision speed, the pilot needs to make a decision. It is the last moment at

which the airplane can still stop its take-oﬀ. In case of an engine failure it might be worth staying on

ground.

If the pilot decides to continue the take-oﬀ, the airplane will soon reach the rotation speed V

r

. At this

point the pilot pulls the nose of the aircraft up, while the rear wheels still stay on the ground. For a brief

moment the aircraft will have a certain constant rotational speed q

rot

, until the desired pitch angle

θ

req

is reached.

A short moment later the lift-oﬀ speed V

lof

is reached. This is the speed at which the wheels no longer

touch the ground. However, the take-oﬀ has not yet been completed. The aircraft still needs to reach the

screen height H

scr

. At this height, which is usually 35 or 50 feet, the aircraft is safe from obstacles like

trees or buildings. The speed of the aircraft at the screen height must be at least a certain climb-out

speed (sometimes called safety speed) V

scr

to ensure a safe climb.

2.2 Decision Speed

All the velocities that were mentioned in the previous paragraph are given to the pilot by the aircraft

manual. However, some one needs to write the manual, so there must be a way to determine these

velocities. We primarily examine the decision speed.

Figure 2.1: Clariﬁcation of decision speed.

Let’s take a look at ﬁgure 2.1. Two graphs are displayed. Graph 1 is the distance you need to stop if you

apply full brakes at the given velocity. Graph 2 is the distance you need to take oﬀ if one engine fails. If

engine failure occurs at low velocities, the distance to stop is small. So it is preferable to stop. For high

velocities stopping requires to much runway space. It’s wiser to take oﬀ with the remaining engines.

The intermediate point, where stopping requires as much distance as taking oﬀ, is of special interest to

us. The velocity at which this occurs is the decision speed. At this speed you can still stop the aircraft,

4

but if you continue accelerating, you have to lift oﬀ. The distance you need to either stop or to take oﬀ

is called the balanced ﬁeld length.

Now let’s look at the other velocities. The screen height is usually equal to the minimum velocity plus a

safety factor. So V

scr

= jV

min

, where for most aircrafts j = 1.2. The rotation speed V

r

is then set at the

velocity such that V

scr

is still reached at the screen height if engine failure occurs.

You may also be wondering what the procedure is if you only have one engine on your aircraft. If that

engine fails, you should brake if you’re able to. If you are not, you should still take oﬀ and hope there is

an empty ﬁeld ahead of you in which you can make an emergency landing.

2.3 Equations of Motion for Ground Phase

To learn more about the ground phase, we look at the forces acting on the aircraft. These forces are

shown in ﬁgure 2.2.

Figure 2.2: Forces acting on the aircraft during ground run.

We have seen all forces already in the chapter about cruise, except the normal force N and the gear

drag D

g

. But what can we say about this gear drag? We can assume that it is proportional to the

normal force N, so

D

g

= µN = µ(W −L), (2.3.1)

where µ is the friction coeﬃcient. This coeﬃcient depends on the wheels of the aircraft, as well as the

environment. If we now look at the forces acting on the aircraft in horizontal direction, we will ﬁnd

W

g

dV

dt

= T −D −D

g

= T −D −µ(W −L). (2.3.2)

It is important to note the other assumptions we have made. We assume that the runway is horizontal,

that there is no wind and once more that the thrust is in the direction of the velocity.

When you apply normal aerodynamics equations to calculate the aerodynamic forces L and D, you should

be careful. Since the aircraft is still on the ground, there is the so-called ground eﬀect. The air which

our wings push down is pushed back up by the ground. This causes the eﬀective angle of attack to

increase. The lift therefore goes up. The ground also reﬂects the vortices our wing creates, partially

canceling them. This causes the induced drag to decrease. The ground eﬀect is therefore considered to

be a positive eﬀect for airplanes.

5

2.4 Take-Oﬀ Distance

Now we are curious about the amount of runway the aircraft needs for the entire take-oﬀ procedure. We

ﬁrst look at the ground phase. From dynamics we know that a ds = V dV . Rewriting gives

s

ground

=

V

lof

0

V dV

a

=

1

¯ a

V

lof

0

V dV =

1

2¯ a

V

2

lof

. (2.4.1)

Here the quantity ¯ a is the mean acceleration, which is equal to

¯ a =

g

W

¯

T −

¯

D −

¯

D

g

, (2.4.2)

where

¯

T,

¯

D and

¯

D

g

are the mean thrust, drag and gear drag, respectively. We use this mean acceleration

because it is very hard to express the thrust, drag and gear drag as a function of the velocity during a

ground run. In practice, however, the mean acceleration ¯ a is approximately equal to the acceleration at

1

2

√

2V

lof

. So the thrust, drag and gear drag only have to be calculated at one given velocity to ﬁnd the

take-oﬀ distance corresponding to the ground phase.

Now let’s consider the airborne part of the take-oﬀ. To ﬁnd this, we ﬁrst have to rewrite the equation of

motion to

T −D −W sin γ =

W

g

dV

dt

=

W

g

dV

ds

ds

dt

=

W

g

dV

ds

V =

W

2g

d(V

2

)

ds

. (2.4.3)

Rewriting again will now give the so-called equation of energy, being

(T −D)ds =

W

2g

d(V

2

) +W sin γ ds =

W

2g

d(V

2

) +WdH, (2.4.4)

where the variable H indicates the height. The left side of this equation indicates the power that is

put into the system, while the right side shows the change in kinetic and potential energy. To ﬁnd the

distance needed to reach the screen height, we once more integrate. We will ﬁnd

sair

0

(T −D)ds =

Vscr

V

lof

W

2g

d(V

2

) +

Hscr

0

WdH, (2.4.5)

(

¯

T −

¯

D)s

air

=

W

2g

(V

scr

−V

lof

) +WH

scr

. (2.4.6)

At the screen height we should have reached a steady climb. We therefore may assume that (

¯

T −

¯

D) =

(T −D)

scr

. Since the speed is constant in a steady climb, we know that dV

scr

= 0 and thus also dV

2

scr

= 0.

This implies that (T −D)

scr

−W sin γ

scr

= 0, or equivalently Wγ

scr

= (T −D)

scr

= (

¯

T −

¯

D), where we

have used sin γ

scr

≈ γ

scr

. Now we ﬁnd that

γ

scr

s

air

=

V

2

scr

−V

2

lof

2g

+H

scr

. (2.4.7)

To ﬁnd the total take-oﬀ distance, simply add up the airborne distance s

air

to the ground run distance

s

ground

.

6

3. Climbing Flight

3.1 Rate of Climb

In the previous chapter we saw the energy equation. If we diﬀerentiate it with respect to the time t we

will ﬁnd

(T −D)

ds

dt

=

W

2g

d(V

2

)

dH

dH

dt

+W

dH

dt

. (3.1.1)

Note that we have made a change of variable to the height H in the middle term. We did this because

we wanted to express things as a function of the rate of climb, denoted by RC = dH/dt. We can thus

rewrite this as

T −D

W

V =

1

2g

d(V

2

)

dH

RC +RC. (3.1.2)

Let’s brieﬂy consider stationary ﬂight. In this case d(V

2

) = 0, so the so-called stationary rate of

climb, denoted by RC

st

, will be

RC

st

=

T −D

W

V =

Pa −Pr

W

= P

s

, (3.1.3)

where P

s

is the speciﬁc excess power. It is the excess power per Newton of aircraft weight. Combining

this with the previous equation will

RC

st

RC

= 1 +

1

2g

d(V

2

)

dH

. (3.1.4)

The factor on the right hand side of this equation is called the kinetic correction factor. The reason

for this is in fact quite logical. Your engines produce a certain amount of excess power (T −D) V . If V

is constant, this energy is spend on increasing the potential energy (that is, climbing). If V increases,

the kinetic energy increases, so less energy can be spend on increasing the potential energy. A correction

factor is then necessary to indicate the diﬀerence between the stationary and non-stationary rate of climb.

3.2 Climb Time

The climb time is the time it takes to reach a given height. It can be found by using the deﬁnition of

the rate of climb. The result will be

t

climb

=

t

climb

0

dt =

H

0

1

RC

dH. (3.2.1)

Let’s assume we want to minimize climb time for a small propeller aircraft. To do this, we need to

maximize the rate of climb. Since a propeller aircraft is a low speed aircraft, the quantity d(V

2

)/2 =

V dV is small enough to be neglected. The kinetic correction factor then becomes 1, so we can assume

RC = RC

st

= P

s

. So we need to maximize

P

s

=

Pa −Pr

W

=

Pa

W

−

DV

L

=

Pa

W

−

C

D

V

C

L

=

Pa

W

−

2

ρ

W

S

C

2

D

C

3

L

. (3.2.2)

Since propeller aircrafts have a constant power available, the left side of the equation is constant. We

therefore need to minimize C

2

D

/C

3

L

. The resulting lift coeﬃcient will be C

L

=

3C

D0

πAe. The corre-

sponding true airspeed V and equivalent airspeed V

e

will be

V =

2

ρ

1

C

L

W

S

and V

e

= V

ρ

ρ

0

=

2

ρ

0

1

C

L

W

S

. (3.2.3)

7

Here we see that the optimal equivalent airspeed remains constant for diﬀerent heights. In fact, when

pilots in real low-speed aircrafts climb, they usually keep a constant indicated airspeed.

But what about high speed aircrafts? In this case the climb time becomes

t

climb

=

H

0

1

RC

dH. =

H

0

1 +

V

g0

dV

dH

RC

st

dH. (3.2.4)

To maximize the climb time is very diﬃcult now. If we maximize the rate of climb at one given time, we

will get a very low value at another time. It is therefore important to maximize the rate of climb over

the entire climb. But how to do that is a question we’re currently not able to answer.

3.3 Zoom Flight and Energy Height

When an aircraft is ﬂying, it has both kinetic energy and potential energy. These energies can be easily

converted to each other by initiating a dive, or by pulling the aircraft’s nose up. A ﬂight procedure where

one type of energy is converted to the other is called a zoom ﬂight. To indicate the eﬀect of zoom

ﬂights, we look at the energy E of the airplane, which stays constant during a zoom ﬂight. This is

E = WH +

W

2g

V

2

. (3.3.1)

If we deﬁne the speciﬁc energy E

h

as the energy per Newton of weight, we will ﬁnd

E

h

=

E

W

= H +

1

2g

V

2

. (3.3.2)

We see that E

h

is more or less similar to the height. In fact, if the airplane converts all its kinetic energy

to potential energy, then its height H will be equal to the speciﬁc energy E

h

of the aircraft. The speciﬁc

energy E

h

is therefore also called the energy height. We now look at how this energy height changes

in time. This goes according to

dE

h

dt

=

dH

dt

+

1

2g

d(V

2

)

dt

= V sin γ +

V

g

dV

dt

. (3.3.3)

We can rewrite the equation of motion of the aircraft to

1

g

dV

dt

=

T −D

W

−sin γ. (3.3.4)

Combining the previous two equations will result in a rather simple relation. This is

dE

h

dt

=

T −D

W

V = P

s

. (3.3.5)

So the time derivative of the speciﬁc energy is the speciﬁc excess power. Let’s suppose we want to reach

a certain energy height with our aircraft. How long would that take us? This is suddenly a rather easy

problem. The time it takes will be

t

climb

=

He

0

1

P

s

dH

e

. (3.3.6)

So the conclusion is simple. To minimize the climb time, we should maximize the speciﬁc excess power

for every H. Especially supersonic aircrafts make good use of this fact. When they are climbing they will,

at some point, reach the transonic barrier. At transonic ﬂight speeds the drag D is very high, resulting

in a low speciﬁc excess power. To minimize this eﬀect, a supersonic aircraft initiates a dive as soon as

he reaches the transonic barrier. In this way he spends as few time as possible in the transonic ﬂight

regime. So to climb as eﬃcient as possible, a dive is necessary. Although this is rather counterintuitive,

it has proven to work in practice.

8

4. Landing

4.1 The Procedure

It’s nice to get an airplane up in the air. But what goes up must come down, and preferably as smooth

as possible. Therefore a landing is a part of every ﬂight.

Before an airplane can land, it ﬁrst must descend. It does this with a certain descend angle ¯ γ, deﬁned

as ¯ γ = −γ, as is be shown in ﬁgure 4.1. This angle is usually ¯ γ = 3

◦

. The approach velocity should

minimally be at V

a

= 1.3V

min

, in case of any unexpected events. The ﬂight path and approach velocity

are controlled by the pilot. If the airplane is going too fast, the pilot will pull up the nose of the aircraft.

If the descend angle is wrong, the pilot will change the power setting of the engine.

Figure 4.1: Forces acting on the aircraft during descend.

The oﬃcial landing procedure starts when the aircraft reaches the screen height, which is about 50 feet

for landings. When the aircraft almost hits the ground, the pilot will turn oﬀ the power on the engines

and the aircraft will ﬂare. The ﬂare is the maneuver in which the pilot pulls up the nose of the aircraft,

decreasing the rate of descent drastically.

When the aircraft makes a touchdown on the ground, it should have a touchdown velocity of about

V

t

= 1.15V

min

. After that it will hit the brakes. Depending on the aircraft, several other things to slow

down the aircraft can be used. The engines can switch to reverse thrust. Also spoilers can be used to

reduce lift. Both mechanisms will be discussed later in this chapter.

4.2 Energy Landing Equation

Just like in the landing, we would like to know the distance an aircraft needs to land. First we look at

the part of the landing in which the aircraft is still in the air. This part starts when the aircraft is at the

screen height. To ﬁnd an equation for the distance, we ﬁrst have to look at the equation of motion. For

a landing aircraft, this is

W

g

dV

dt

= T −D +W sin ¯ γ. (4.2.1)

Let’s divide this equation by the weight ﬁrst. If we then multiply it by dt and multiply again V = ds/dt

we will get

1

2g

d(V

2

) =

T −D

W

ds + sin ¯ γ ds =

T −D

W

ds −dH. (4.2.2)

9

Now we can integrate from the screen height (with height H

scr

and approach velocity V

a

) to the ground

(with height 0 and touchdown velocity V

t

). The result will be

V

2

t

2g

−

V

2

a

2g

+H

scr

=

¯

T −

¯

D

W

s

air

(4.2.3)

Just like we did in previous parts, we have used the mean thrust

¯

T and drag

¯

D. This time we assume

that the value of

¯

T −

¯

D is the average of the value at screen height (

¯

T −

¯

D)

scr

and the value at touchdown

(

¯

T −

¯

D)

t

. At screen height the aircraft is in a steady descent, so (

¯

T −

¯

D)

scr

= Wγ = −W¯ γ

a

, where

¯ γ

a

is the approach angle. At touchdown the pilot will have put out the engines, so T

t

= 0. Therefore

(

¯

T −

¯

D)

t

= −D

t

= −W

C

D

C

L

t

. Combining all the data gives

V

2

t

2g

−

V

2

a

2g

+H

scr

=

¯

T −

¯

D

W

s

air

= −

1

2

s

air

¯ γ

a

+

C

D

C

L

t

. (4.2.4)

This equation is called the energy landing equation. This is because once more energy is involved.

The left hand side of the equation is proportional to the change in energy, while the middle side is related

to the work done on the aircraft. Using the energy landing equation, the value of s

air

can be determined.

4.3 Brake Distance

When the aircraft safely touches down on the ground, how much distance does it need to brake? To ﬁnd

this distance, we once more use the equation a ds = V dV . The brake distance then is

s

ground

=

0

Vt

V dV

a

= −

V

2

t

2¯ a

. (4.3.1)

Note that we have again used the mean acceleration. The minus sign on the right hand side is present

because this mean acceleration is negative. (The aircraft is slowing down.) In fact, it can be expressed

as

¯ a = −

g

W

¯

D +

¯

D

g

−

¯

T

= −

g

W

¯

D +

¯

D

g

+

¯

T

rev

, (4.3.2)

where T

rev

is the magnitude of the reverse thrust. Just like during take-oﬀ, it is a good approximation

to take values of D, D

g

and T

rev

at a velocity of

1

2

√

2V

t

as the mean values.

Substituting the previous equation in the one before it will give the brake distance. It will be

s

ground

=

W

g

V

2

t

¯

D +

¯

D

g

+

¯

T

rev

. (4.3.3)

4.4 Braking

For the aircraft to come to a full stop, brakes are used. It is useful to know how those brakes work. That

is why the wheels of an aircraft are tested very well before they are used. To do this, engineers put them

on a ﬂoor which is able to move. Let’s suppose the ﬂoor will move with a velocity V , as is shown in

ﬁgure 4.2. The wheel with radius r will then get an angular velocity ω. If the wheel does not slip, then

V = ωr. If the wheel does slip, these two values are not equal. The so-called slip is therefore deﬁned as

the dimensionless factor

slip =

V −ωr

V

. (4.4.1)

10

Figure 4.2: Forces/Moments acting on the wheel of an aircraft.

Now let’s examine the forces acting on the wheel. From examining vertical forces we ﬁnd that N = W−L.

There is only one horizontal force, being the ground drag. This ground drag is equal to

D

g

= µN = µ(W −L) , (4.4.2)

where µ is the friction coeﬃcient of the wheel. We want to come to a stop as fast as possible, so we

intent to maximize the ground drag. We do this by maximizing the friction coeﬃcient. It turns out that

µ highly depends on the slip. For small slip values the friction coeﬃcient still increases. However, at a

certain point the coeﬃcient reaches its maximum µ

max

. If the slip increases even further, µ decreases

again. So it’s wise to allow some slip, but not too much.

If we now examine the moments acting on the aircraft, we will ﬁnd that

µ(W −L) r −Q

brake

= I

dω

dt

, (4.4.3)

where Q

brake

is the brake torque applied by the braking system. This brake torque can be set. Given a

certain brake torque, equilibrium points can be found for ω. Knowing ω, also the slip can be determined.

However, some of these equilibrium points are stable, while others are unstable. A stable equilibrium

point means that ω will return to its original value after small deviations. Stable equilibrium points have

a positive value of dµ/d(slip).

For unstable equilibrium points the opposite happens. When small deviations occur, the slip diverges

away from the equilibrium point. This could result in a rapid increase in slip and thus a rapid decrease in

ground drag. To prevent this, aircrafts are often equipped with an anti-lock braking system (ABS).

Unstable equilibrium points have a negative value of dµ/d(slip).

To increase the ground drag, you don’t only need a high friction coeﬃcient. You also need a normal force.

When the aircraft touches down, the lift is still approximately equal to the weight, so N = W − L = 0.

To solve this problem, spoilers are used. These are small deﬂectable plates on top of the wing. If they

are deployed, they disturb the airﬂow and decrease the lift enormously.

So the landing procedure can now be determined. As soon as you touch down, deploy the spoilers and

brake in such a way that the friction coeﬃcient is as high as possible.

11

5. Coordinate Systems

5.1 System Deﬁnitions

In the previous chapters we have derived equations of motion in a rather simple way: By drawing a

picture and examining forces. This gets increasingly complicated if the ﬂight is more three-dimensional.

That’s why it is useful to deﬁne various coordinate systems.

We start with the geodetic system, which has subscript g. The x

g

-axis is deﬁned as pointing north,

while the z

g

-axis points downward, to the center of the earth. The y

g

-axis can now be found by using

the right-hand rule. The origin of the coordinate system is at any point on the surface of the earth.

Now let’s shift the origin of the geodetic system to the center of gravity (COG) of the aircraft. Now we

have found the moving earth system, having subscript e.

Now we the road splits up in two paths. We could rotate the coordinate system to the body system of

the aircraft (subscript b). The x

b

-axis then coincides with the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (forward

direction being positive). The y

b

axis coincides with the latitudinal axis of the aircraft. Its positive

direction is such that the z

b

-axis (found with the right-hand rule) points downward.

The body system isn’t very useful in performance. That’s why we’ll mostly use the air path system

(subscript a). Now we rotate the coordinate system such that the x

a

-axis points in the direction of the

velocity. Just like in the body system, the z

a

-axis points downward.

5.2 Equations of Motion for Symmetric Flight

To demonstrate the use of these coordinate systems, we will derive the equations of motion for a symmetric

ﬂight. Let’s call E the matrix

i j k

T

. The position of any point in the air path system can be

expressed as

r =

x y z

E

a

, (5.2.1)

where E

a

=

i

a

j

a

k

a

T

. The velocity can then be expressed as

V = ˙ r =

V 0 0

E

a

. (5.2.2)

Now we see why it is convenient to use the air path system. Since the x

a

-axis points per deﬁnition in the

direction of the velocity vector, we have an easy relation here. We can once more take a time derivative

to ﬁnd the acceleration. This is

a =

˙

V =

˙

V 0 0

E

a

+

V 0 0

˙

E

a

. (5.2.3)

Note that we had to use the product rule. But what is

˙

E

a

? We know that the components of E

a

can

not change in magnitude, as they are unit vectors. They can only change in direction, when something

rotates. We have assumed we’re in a symmetric ﬂight, so the only rotation is when γ changes. Expressing

˙

E

a

in ˙ γ gives

E

a

=

−k˙ γ 0 i ˙ γ

. (5.2.4)

The rotation operator R is deﬁned such that

˙

E

a

=

0 0 −˙ γ

0 0 0

˙ γ 0 0

¸

¸

¸E

a

= RE

a

. (5.2.5)

12

If we insert this in the relation for a, we will ﬁnd

a =

˙

V 0 0

E

a

+

V 0 0

RE

a

=

˙

V 0 0

E

a

+

0 0 −V ˙ γ

E

a

=

˙

V 0 −V ˙ γ

E

a

. (5.2.6)

We can also express the forces in the air path system. We once more assume the thrust is in the direction

of the velocity. Working everything out gives

F =

T −D −W sin γ 0 L −W cos γ

E

a

. (5.2.7)

We can now use F = ma. This relation must hold for all three components of these vectors. Looking at

the y-component will give 0 = 0, which isn’t altogether interesting. Looking at the x and z-components

however, will give two interesting relations, being

m

˙

V = T −D −W sin γ, and mV ˙ γ = L −W cos γ. (5.2.8)

These are exactly the equations of motion we already know. So this method actually works. It may seem

like a lot of work now, but for diﬃcult situations this approach is actually a lot easier than what we did

in the previous chapters.

5.3 Switching Between Systems

Suppose we have certain coordinates in the moving earth system and want to transform them to the air

path system. How do we do this? The key to answering this question, is the transformation matrix.

We go from the moving earth system to the air path system in several steps. First we rotate the moving

earth system about its z-axis, such that the x-axis points in the direction of the velocity vector as much

as possible. (The y-component of V should then be 0.) We now have rotated over the so-called azimuth

angle χ. We call this intermediate system E

1

. We can now show that

x y z

E

1

=

xcos χ −y sin χ xsin χ +y cos χ 1

E

e

=

x y z

cos χ sin χ 0

−sin χ cos χ 0

0 0 1

¸

¸

¸E

e

.

(5.3.1)

The matrix on the right-hand side (the one with the sines and cosines) is the transformation matrix,

denoted by [χ]. It transforms E

e

to E

1

. Note that we could have removed the matrix with the x, y and

z in the above equations. The equation would then simply be E

1

= [χ] E

e

.

But we haven’t reached the air path system yet. To continue, we rotate system 1 around the y-axis over

the ﬂight path angle γ, such that the x-axis actually coincides with the velocity vector V. We give

this intermediate system number 2. We now have

E

2

= [γ] E

1

= [γ] [χ] E

e

, (5.3.2)

where the transformation matrix [γ] is derived similar to [χ]. We’re almost at the air path system.

There’s only one remaining thing that we have neglected in all previous chapters. Previously we have

only considered symmetric ﬂights. But now we consider any type of ﬂight. So we still need to rotate

around the x-axis by the aerodynamic roll angle µ. The result will be

E

a

= [µ] E

2

= [µ] [γ] [χ] E

e

. (5.3.3)

We have now expressed the air path system as a function of the moving earth system. It is very important

to note the order of the transformation matrices. Mixing up the order of the matrices will give wrong

results.

13

But what if we want to reverse the transformation - go from the air path system to the moving earth

system? That is relatively simple. All the transformation matrices are orthonormal matrices (meaning

that their columns are linearly independent and all have unit length). Any orthonormal matrix A has

the property A

−1

= A

T

. Using this fact, we can write

E

e

= ([µ] [γ] [χ])

−1

E

a

= [χ]

−1

[γ]

−1

[µ]

−1

E

a

= [χ]

T

[γ]

T

[µ]

T

E

a

. (5.3.4)

Note that now also the order of the matrices has reversed.

5.4 General Equations of Aircraft Motion

We have derived the equations of motion for symmetric ﬂights previously in this chapter. We can now

derive the general equations of motion for any type of ﬂight. First we need to consider the acceleration of

the aircraft. This is still given by equation 5.2.3. However, the value of

˙

E

a

has been drastically changed.

By examining the aircraft motion, we can ﬁnd that

˙

E

a

=

0 r −q

−r 0 p

q −p 0

¸

¸

¸E

a

= RE

a

, (5.4.1)

where p is the rotational velocity about the x-axis, q is the rotational velocity about the y-axis and r is

the rotational velocity about the z-axis.

Now we know the acceleration of the aircraft, we need to look at the forces acting on the aircraft. These

are

F = T+D+L +W =

T −D 0 −L

E

a

+

0 0 W

E

e

. (5.4.2)

Now we see why we need the transformation matrices. To be able to work with these equations, we need

to express them in the same coordinate system. It’s wisest to use E

a

as the coordinate system. Luckily

we know how to convert something from E

e

to E

a

. If we work everything out and use F = ma we will

get

T −D 0 −L

E

a

+

0 0 W

[χ]

T

[γ]

T

[µ]

T

E

a

=

m

˙

V 0 0

E

a

+

mV 0 0

RE

a

. (5.4.3)

Now we can derive the general equations of motion. By examining all three components, we ﬁnd three

equation. These are

T −D −W sin γ = m

˙

V , (5.4.4)

W cos γ sin µ = mV r, (5.4.5)

L −W cos γ cos µ = mV q. (5.4.6)

We can use transformation matrices to rewrite these equations to a more useful form, being

m

˙

V = T −D −W sin γ, (5.4.7)

mV ˙ χcos γ = Lsin µ, (5.4.8)

mV ˙ γ = Lcos µ −W cos γ. (5.4.9)

These equations are useful when describing many ﬂight types. However, they do have their constraints.

They don’t take into account forces/moments caused by the elevators, the ailerons or the rudder. So

keep that in mind when applying them.

14

6. Eﬀects of Wind

6.1 Equations of Motion

An aircraft ﬂies in air. So its speed is also measured with respect to the air. In case of winds, this

velocity is not equal to the velocity of the aircraft with respect to the ground. Instead, this velocity can

be expressed as

V

g

= V+V

w

, (6.1.1)

where V

w

is the velocity of the wind with respect to the ground. We usually assume this velocity is

directed parallel to the ground, in such a way that the aircraft experiences headwind. Therefore

V

w

=

V

w

0 0

E

g

. (6.1.2)

To derive the equations of motion, we look at the acceleration of the aircraft, which is

a =

˙

V

g

=

˙

V+

˙

V

w

=

˙

V 0 0

E

a

+

V 0 0

˙

E

a

+

−

˙

V

w

0 0

E

g

. (6.1.3)

Note that we have not written the term involving

˙

E

g

. This is because E

g

doesn’t change, so

˙

E

g

= 0. If

we assume the aircraft is in a symmetric ﬂight, we can rewrite the acceleration as

a =

˙

V −

˙

V

w

cos γ 0 −V ˙ γ −

˙

V

w

sin γ

E

a

. (6.1.4)

Using Newton’s second law this time results in

T −D −W sin γ =

W

g

˙

V −

˙

V

w

cos γ

, (6.1.5)

L −W cos γ =

W

g

V ˙ γ +

˙

V

w

sin γ

. (6.1.6)

These are the equations of motion if the airplane experiences headwind. But not only the equations of

motion are slightly diﬀerent. Also the kinematics equations have changed. They now are

˙

H = V sin γ and ˙ s = V cos γ −V

w

. (6.1.7)

6.2 Taking Oﬀ and Landing

When the airplane is in the air, it’s relatively simple to calculate the eﬀects of it. But what if the aircraft

is near the ground? We ﬁrst consider the take-oﬀ and then look at the landing.

During take-oﬀ the aircraft needs to reach the lift-oﬀ speed V

lof

to be able to lift oﬀ from the ground.

This speed is measured with respect to the wind. The speed of the aircraft is, however, measured with

respect to the ground. So there is a diﬀerence. Let’s suppose V

lof

= 100kts. If there is a headwind of

20kts, then the aircraft only needs to have a velocity of V = 80kts with respect to the ground to take

oﬀ. If, however, the wind comes from the back of the aircraft, it needs a velocity of V = 120kts. So if

you take oﬀ with headwind, you need a much lower velocity, and thus a much shorter runway. Therefore

its preferable to take oﬀ with headwinds.

The situation is virtually the same for landings. If you land with headwinds, you have a much lower

velocity with respect to the ground, and therefore it’s much easier to come to a full stop. If you land

with the wind blowing in your back, then you need a much greater distance to come to a complete stop.

15

6.3 Wind Gradients

When climbing or descending, the situation is approximately the same. It’s better to climb/descend with

headwinds. To show this, we derive an equation which involves the wind gradient dV

w

/dH. First we

rewrite

˙

V and

˙

V

w

to

˙

V =

dV

dt

=

dV

dH

dH

dt

=

dV

dH

RC andidentically

˙

V

w

=

dV

dH

RC. (6.3.1)

Substituting this in equation 6.1.5 will give

W

g

dV

dH

RC −

dV

w

dH

RC cos γ

= T −D −W sin γ. (6.3.2)

Multiplying by V/W will then give

V

g

RC

dV

dH

−

dV

w

dH

cos γ

+V sin γ =

TV −DV

W

=

P

a

−P

r

W

= RC

st

. (6.3.3)

Rewriting V sin γ = RC and bringing terms within brackets will give

RC

1 +

V

g

dV

dH

−

V

g

dV

w

dH

= RC

st

. (6.3.4)

Climbs are usually performed at an approximately constant velocity, so we can assume that dV/dH = 0.

Now look at the term dV

w

/dH. Winds usually blow harder at higher altitudes. In case of headwinds this

means that dV

w

/dH > 0 and thus RC > RC

st

. If the wind is in your back, then dV

w

/dH < 0 and thus

RC < RC

st

. So to climb faster, it is better to have headwinds.

The situation is similar for descending. Since RD = −RC and RD

st

= −RD

st

we ﬁnd

RD

1 +

V

g

dV

dH

−

V

g

dV

w

dH

= RD

st

. (6.3.5)

This once more shows that RD > RD

st

in case you are descending with headwinds.

6.4 Microbursts

A microburst is a column of descending air, like is displayed in ﬁgure 6.1. As the air comes close to the

ground, it diverges in multiple directions. It’s similar to the water coming out of a tap. When the ﬂow

of water hits the sink, it moves away in all directions.

Figure 6.1: Microburst.

When an aircraft is ﬂying into a microburst, it ﬁrst experiences a headwind. It therefore slows down a

bit with respect to the ground. When it passes the center of the microburst, the direction of the wind

suddenly seems to reverse. The aircraft has then lost almost all of its speed, and more or less plummets

to the ground. Although microbursts are relatively rare phenomena, they have caused multiple aircrafts

to crash.

16

7. Turning Flight

7.1 Turn Strategy

Flying in a straight line tends to get boring after a while, and it limits your possible destinations. So you

need to be able to turn the aircraft. How should we do this? We consider three options

• Change µ. To see the eﬀect, we examine the three-dimensional equations of motion that were

derived previously. Let’s examine the second equation. Since µ = 0 also sin µ = 0 and thus ˙ χ = 0.

So we will turn. Now look at the third equation. Since cos µ will decrease we ﬁnd that ˙ γ < 0. That

means we start plummeting to the ground. Since that is rather unwanted, this option isn’t a very

good one.

• In addition to changing µ also increase the angle of attack α. If we do this in such a way that

Lcos µ stays constant, we won’t drop to the ground. But now look at the ﬁrst equation of motion.

Since the angle of attack α increased also the drag D increased. Therefore

˙

V < 0. This means

we will slow down and reduce lift. Of course we can increase α even more, but we can’t do this

indeﬁnitely. After a while we will stall and fall to the ground. So this isn’t a good option either.

• Let’s now change µ, increase the angle of attack α and increase the thrust T. If we increase the

thrust enough to compensate for the additional drag D, we won’t slow down. Therefore we are

performing a perfect horizontal turn.

The third method seems to be a good one. But we have already mentioned that the equations of motion

don’t consider rudder and aileron deﬂection. In a real airplane we also need to compensate with the rudder

to prevent adverse yaw. But if we do that too, we are actually able to perform a perfect horizontal turn.

7.2 Turn Radius and Load Factor

So we now know how to rotate an aircraft. But how much space do we need? From physics we know that

F

c

= mV

2

/R, where F

c

is the centrifugal force and R is the turn radius. Since we are considering a

horizontal turn, we know that γ = ˙ γ = 0. The centrifugal force therefore is

F

c

= Lsin µ =

W

g

V

2

R

. (7.2.1)

In a horizontal turn the relation L = W doesn’t hold anymore. Instead, from the equations of motion we

can ﬁnd that

W = Lcos µ = Lcos φ, (7.2.2)

where φ is a variable which is used to indicate the bank angle in horizontal turns. In this case it’s equal

to µ. Now we can deﬁne the load factor n as

n =

L

W

=

1

cos φ

=

V

2

g

1

Rsin µ

. (7.2.3)

If we now use the fact that µ = φ and also the mathematical relation sin

2

x + cos

2

x = 1 we can express

the turn radius in the load factor. The result will be

R =

V

2

g

√

n

2

−1

. (7.2.4)

Note that always n > 1. So in every horizontal turn you make you feel slightly heavier.

17

We would also like to know how long a turn takes. The angular velocity of the turn Ω is simply equal to

Ω = V/R = ˙ χ. Knowing this, we know that the time it takes to make a complete 360

◦

turn is

T

2π

=

2π

Ω

= 2π

R

V

= 2π

V

g

√

n

2

−1

. (7.2.5)

So if you want to make a fast turn you actually have to ﬂy as slow as possible. This may seem counterin-

tuitive. To do something fast you need to decrease your speed. But when you’re driving a bike or a car

you also slow down when making a turn. So it actually makes sense to all of us.

7.3 Power During a Turn

We know that we need to increase the engine power during a turn. But by how much is this? We know

that L = nW, so from that we can derive that

V =

2

ρ

1

C

L

nW

S

. (7.3.1)

We can also express the drag as

D =

C

D

C

L

nW. (7.3.2)

If we combine these two equations, we can ﬁnd the power required to be

P

r

= DV =

2

ρ

C

2

D

C

3

L

(nW)

3

S

. (7.3.3)

So we ﬁnd that the power required is proportional to n

√

n. So the higher the load factor, the higher the

power required. Of course our engine has a maximum power available. So this determines the maximum

load factor n

max

. Using equation 7.3.2 and the relation T = D we ﬁnd that

n

max

=

T

W

C

L

C

D

. (7.3.4)

However, for low velocities the maximum load factor isn’t bounded by the power available. It is then

bounded by the maximum lift coeﬃcient C

Lmax

according to

n

max

=

L

max

W

=

ρV

2

SC

Lmax

2W

. (7.3.5)

In both cases the maximum velocity in a turn will be

V

nmax

=

2

ρ

1

C

L

n

max

W

S

. (7.3.6)

18

8. Helicopters

8.1 Actuator Disk Theory

In a helicopter, lift isn’t created by the wings, but by rotating blades. This enables helicopters to hover.

In case of hovering ﬂight, the thrust produced by the rotor blades T must be equal to the weight W.

But how can we calculate this thrust? One way to do this is by using the actuator disk theory, which

has already been treated in the Aerodynamics A course. We will brieﬂy repeat that theory here. Suppose

we have a set of rotating blades, called the actuator disk. We can consider 4 points now. Point 0 is

inﬁnitely far to the left of the disk, while point 1 is just a little bit to the left of the disk. Identically,

point 2 is just to the right of the disk and point 3 is inﬁnitely far to the right.

If we assume the velocity is evenly distributed over the actuator disk, and that the ﬂow is incompressible

and irrotational, we can derive a few simple relations. Let’s deﬁne the induced velocity V

i

as V

i

=

V

1

−V

0

. We can now show that V

2

= V

1

and also V

3

−V

2

= V

i

. So therefore the total velocity increment

of the air is V

3

−V

0

= 2V

i

. We can also show that the thrust now is

T = 2mV

i

= 2ρπr

2

V

i

, (8.1.1)

where m is the mass ﬂow of air that goes through the disk and r is the actuator disk radius.

8.2 Helicopter Power

How much power would the engine need to provide to hover? In an ideal situation the power would be

the diﬀerence between the rate of power that comes out of the system, and the rate of power that goes

in. This would make the so-called ideal power

P

id

= e

out

−e

in

=

1

2

m(V

0

+ 2V

i

)

2

−

1

2

mV

2

0

= 2mV

i

(V

0

+V

i

) = T (V

0

+V

i

) . (8.2.1)

In a hovering ﬂight, the initial velocity V

0

, being the velocity far away from the disk, is 0. So we also

know that P

id

= TV

i

= WV

i

. If we apply T = W to the last equation of the previous paragraph, we can

also ﬁnd that

V

i

=

W

2ρπr

2

. (8.2.2)

The ideal power of the helicopter now becomes

P

id

= WV

i

= W

W

2ρπr

2

. (8.2.3)

So to reduce the ideal power, we need to decrease our weight, increase the rotor blade size or simply ﬂy at

a lower altitude. However, the ideal power isn’t the actual power that is needed from the engine. There

are always losses. These losses are all combined in one sign. This is the so-called ﬁgure of merit M,

deﬁned as

M =

P

id

P

hov

, (8.2.4)

where P

hov

is the actual power that is necessary to hover. For most modern helicopters the ﬁgure of

merit is about M = 0.7.

19

8.3 Blade Element Theory

In the blade element theory we look at an inﬁnitely small piece of a rotor blade and derive the lift dL

and drag dD acting on that piece. Using those forces we can integrate to ﬁnd the thrust and drag of the

full rotor blades.

Figure 8.1: Motions and forces in the blade element theory.

So let’s look at an inﬁnitely small piece of a rotor blade, at a distance r from the center. Such a piece is

shown in ﬁgure 8.1. Since the rotor rotates with an angular velocity of Ω, the small piece of rotor blade

has a velocity component to the left of Ωr. Due to the induced velocity, there is a downward pointing

velocity component of V

i

. Together they form the resultant velocity V

r

. Since this velocity is not directed

horizontally, the air has a certain inﬂow angle φ. Also a pitch angle θ and an angle of attack α can

be distinguished.

The small bit of thrust dT acting on the rotor blade part now is

dT = dLcos φ −dDsin φ ≈ dL, (8.3.1)

where we have approximated cos φ ≈ 1 and sin φ ≈ 0. The power that is needed to keep the rotor rotating

is

dP = dDΩr = (dLsin φ +dDcos φ) Ωr ≈ dT V

i

+dDΩr, (8.3.2)

where we this time have approximated cos φ ≈ 1 and sin φ ≈ tan φ = V

i

/Ωr. To ﬁnd the total power that

is needed for all the rotor blades, we integrate over one entire rotor blade and multiply by the number of

blades n. The power then becomes

P = n

R

0

V

i

dT +n

R

0

Ωr dD = TV

i

+P

p

= P

i

+P

p

, (8.3.3)

where P

i

is the induced component of the power and P

p

is the power necessary to compensate for the

proﬁle drag of the blades. Also R is the length of the entire rotor blade. The variable P

i

is usually

approximated using P

i

= kP

id

, where the correction factor k is often about 1.2. The power component

P

p

is a bit more diﬃcult to determine. If c

dp

is the proﬁle drag component of the rotor blade piece, we

can write

P

p

= n

R

0

Ωr dD = n

R

0

c

dp

1

2

ρ (Ωr)

3

cdr =

¯ c

dp

σ

8

ΩR

2

3

πR

2

. (8.3.4)

Here the sign ¯ c

dp

indicates the mean drag coeﬃcient for the entire rotor. The factor σ is called the rotor

solidity, deﬁned as

σ =

nRc

πR

2

. (8.3.5)

There is a simple physical meaning behind this rotor solidity. It’s the part of the rotor disk that is ﬁlled

with blades. The surface area of the rotor disk is simply πR

2

, while the surface area of the blades is nRc.

20

8.4 Forward Flight

Helicopters would tend to get boring if they can only hover. They can also ﬂy forward. To let helicopters

ﬂy forward, you ﬁrst have to rotate the rotor disk. When doing this, you have to keep in mind the

gyroscopic eﬀect, as the rotor disk is rotating quite rapidly.

The angle with which the rotor disk is tilted forward is called the disk angle of attack α

d

. Since we’re

ﬂying forward now, we experience drag. First of all a drag force H

0

acts on the rotor disk. But the rest

of the helicopter (the so-called bus) is also suspect to drag. This is the so-called parasite drag D

par

.

The total power that the engine now needs to provide is

kTV

i

+P

p

+H

0

V +D

par

V = P

i

+P

p

+P

drag

+P

par

. (8.4.1)

Let’s look at the individual power components now. To ﬁnd an expression for the proﬁle drag P

p

we can

once more use the blade element theory. But it’s a bit more complicated this time. The velocity of a

small blade element depends not only on the distance r from the rotor disk center. It also depends on

the angle ψ it makes with respect to the direction of the velocity. If a small piece of rotor moves in the

same direction as the velocity of the helicopter, than the two velocities need to be added up. So then

V

r

= ΩR +V cos α

d

. In the opposite case they need to be subtracted. In general we can say that

V

r

= ΩR +V cos α

d

sin µ. (8.4.2)

What we do now is simply integrate over the entire rotor disk, as if there was a rotor blade at every small

angle dψ. We then divide by 2π to get the average proﬁle power for a certain rotor blade. Of course we

also multiply by the number of rotor blades n. The proﬁle power then becomes

P

p

=

n

2π

2π

0

R

0

c

dp

1

2

ρ (Ωr +V cos α

d

sin µ)

2

c Ωr dr

dψ =

¯ c

dp

σ

8

ρ (ΩR)

3

πR

2

1 +µ

2

. (8.4.3)

Note that the proﬁle power can also be written as P

p

= P

hov

1 +µ

2

**, where the hover power is equal to
**

P

hov

=

¯ c

dp

σ

8

ρ (ΩR)

3

πR

2

. (8.4.4)

The sign µ indicates the so-called advance ratio and is deﬁned as

µ =

V cos α

d

ΩR

. (8.4.5)

In practice µ

max

≈ 0.3. If the helicopter goes any faster, two things can occur. It may occur that

the blade facing headwind (the so-called advancing blade with velocity ΩR + V cos α

d

) experiences

a supersonic ﬂow. It is also possible that the so-called retreating blade with velocity ΩR − V cos α

d

actually moves backward. Both situations are not really positive.

The drag power due to H

0

is rather diﬃcult to determine. That’s why it is simply approximated by

P

drag

= H

0

V cos α

d

= P

hov

4.65µ

2

. (8.4.6)

The most important contribution to the drag is the parasite drag. Especially for high velocities this drag

dominates. The power necessary to counteract this drag is

P

par

= D

bus

V = C

D

bus

1

2

ρV

3

A

ref

, (8.4.7)

where C

D

bus

is the drag coeﬃcient of the bus and A

ref

is a certain reference area.

Now we can draw our conclusions. The values of P

p

and P

drag

are fairly constant with increasing V . The

induced power P

p

even decreases if we ﬂy forward. The parasite drag, however, strongly increases. To

reduce drag it’s therefore best to make the helicopter bus as aerodynamic as possible.

21

8.5 Autorotation

What happens if the engine of the helicopter fails? It turns out that the helicopter will not fall to the

ground. Instead, a phenomenon called autorotation occurs. The rotor disk starts rotating itself.

Figure 8.2: Forces acting on an autorotating rotorblade.

To explain why autorotation occurs, we examine the forces acting on the rotor blades. These forces are

shown in ﬁgure 8.2. When the engine fails, the helicopter will start to lose height. It will get a certain

descend speed ¯ c. Due to this descend speed, it will seem like the induced velocity now has magnitude

¯ c − V

i

and is pointed upward. Since the induced velocity points upward, the resultant velocity will also

be tilted upward. Therefore the lift vector will be tilted in the forward direction. The vertical component

of the lift vector still provides thrust, but now the horizontal component powers the rotor blades. The

rotor disk rotates on its own.

This however only happens if the pilot takes action. If the engine fails, the descend speed will increase.

This means that the resultant velocity vector will start to tilt upward, increasing the angle of attack. If

the pilot doesn’t do anything, stall will occur and almost all lift will be gone. Therefore the pilot needs

to decrease the pitch angle of the rotor blade as soon as engine failure occurs.

But what if the pilot forgets to reduce the pitch? In this case the helicopter is in serious trouble. Since

there is stall, the rotor blade hardly has any lift and can’t power itself. The only chance the pilot has is to

start performing a forward ﬂight with the helicopter, converting potential energy to kinetic energy. When

suﬃcient velocity has been gathered, the pilot can change that kinetic energy into rotational velocity of

the rotor blade. If, however, there isn’t enough height (and thus not enough potential energy) to reach

the right velocity, the pilot will probably not live to learn from his mistake.

22

1.2

Cruise Flight Strategy

During the cruise ﬂight you want to use as few fuel as possible. If you want to stay as long in the air as possible, you should maximize the endurance. The endurance E is the time which you can stay in the air with a given amount of fuel. To maximize E you should minimize the fuel ﬂow F . If, however, you want to go as far as possible, you should maximize the range. The range R is the distance you can cover with a given amount of fuel. So the distance ds per weight of fuel used dWf should be maximized. So we need to maximize ds/dt V ds = = . dWf dWf /dt F (1.2.1)

For jet engines we can assume that the fuel ﬂow varies linearly with the thrust, so F = cT T = cT D, where the constant term cT is the speciﬁc fuel consumption. Also, from the deﬁnition of the lift and drag coeﬃcient follows that D/CD = L/CL = W/CL . Combining all this gives V V CL V = = = F cT D cT W CD 1 2 CL 2 . SW c2 ρ CD T (1.2.2)

So to increase the range we should decrease ρ. That is simple. We should ﬂy as high as possible. Now let’s consider we’re ﬂying at a given altitude (and thus constant density ρ). We need to maximize 2 CL 2 2 CL /CD . Diﬀerentiating this fraction by using CD = CD0 + πAe will show that CL /CD is minimal if CL = 1 CD πAe. 3 0 (1.2.3)

So we now have suﬃcient data to determine our strategy. We should ﬂy as high as possible and choose our V such that V /F is at a maximum. But what if the determined velocity V with which we need to ﬂy is beyond a speed limit of our aircraft? In that case we should ﬂy at the speed limit, so V = Vlim . It now is important to minimize the drag D. Minimum drag occurs if CL /CD is maximal, resulting in a lift coeﬃcient of CL = CD0 πAe. We also need to choose our height H (and thus the density ρ) such that the drag D is minimal. This occurs if ρopt = W 2 1 . 2 S Vlim CL (1.2.4)

1.3

Finding the Range

Now we are curious, what will the range be if we ﬂy in this optimal condition? To ﬁnd an equation for the range, we ﬁrst express the distance traveled ds as a function of the change in weight dW according to dW dW ds dW V F =− =− =− V ⇒ ds = − dW. (1.3.1) dt ds dt ds F The range can now be found by integration. To get a meaningful result, we make a change-of-variable according to the above relation. So the range is

s1 W1

R=

s0

ds =

W0

−

V CL V dW = − F cT CD

W1 W0

V CL 1 dW = ln W cT CD

W0 W1

,

(1.3.2)

where W0 is the initial mass of the aircraft and W1 the ﬁnal mass. The above equation is called the equation of Breguet. We will examine it more closely at the end of this chapter. 2

What should we do? We can consider several ﬂying strategies and then select the best.5. This is usually considered the best strategy. And ﬁnally the fraction W0 /W1 indicates the quality of the structure of the aircraft. For jet aircrafts the fuel consumption is approximately proportional to the thrust.5 Propeller Aircrafts The previous paragraphs were all about jet aircrafts. the velocity V will decrease. being R= H CL ηtot ln g CD W0 W1 .5. Keep constant angle of attack α and velocity V .5. Keep constant velocity V and height H. 3. Pin cT H Hg (1.4) where H is the speciﬁc energy of the fuel in J/kg. the factor V /F will be far below optimal during the rest of the ﬂight. Doing this will result in the optimal V /F during ﬂight. (1. The total eﬃciency of a jet aircraft is ηtot = Pout TV V g = F = .1. The factor ηtot indicates the quality of the propulsion system. Keep constant engine settings Γ and height H. Although the velocity V will increase. Now let’s brieﬂy consider propeller aircrafts. Keep constant angle of attack α and height H.3) (1.1) ηp ηp where ηp is the propulsive eﬃciency. 4. 1. but it will still be below optimal.5. The factor CL /CD shows the aerodynamic quality.2) This looks rather similar to the equation of the range for jet aircrafts. This time the factor V /F will be better. So cp cp F = cp Pbr = Pa = T V. There is a fundamental diﬀerence between these two aircrafts. Pin cp H Hg (1. So the conclusion is that it is best to ﬂy at a constant velocity V and angle of attack α with a slightly positive ﬂight path angle γ.4 Optimum Cruise Condition We have determined how to ﬂy as optimal as possible at a given point.5. So the conclusion is simple: Well-designed aircrafts ﬂy further with less fuel. which is so important for the range. (1. The total eﬃciency of a propeller aircraft is ηtot = ηp g Pout TV = F = . 3 .5) Filling this in in Breguet’s equation will give the same result for both types of aircraft. 2. now becomes V ηp CL 1 = .6) The factor H/g is a measure of the fuel quality. which is unwanted if we want to get somewhere fast. 1.5. F cp CD W Deriving the equation of Breguet for propeller aircrafts will then give R= ηp CL ln cp CD W0 W1 . The factor V /F . (1. This can be illustrated further if we look at the eﬃciency of both engines. The value of V /F will still remain optimal. The height at which we are ﬂying increases during ﬂight. But as we continue ﬂying our weight W decreases and we’re not ﬂying optimal anymore. However. For propeller aircrafts the fuel consumption is more or less proportional to the power Pbr of the engine.

At this speed you can still stop the aircraft. The take-oﬀ procedure for other airplanes is similar. is of special interest to us.1. The velocity at which this occurs is the decision speed. However.1 The Procedure Aircrafts usually ﬂy. Graph 2 is the distance you need to take oﬀ if one engine fails. 2. We primarily examine the decision speed. We now take a close look at the lift-oﬀ procedure of a multi-engined jet aircraft. where stopping requires as much distance as taking oﬀ. they ﬁrst have to take oﬀ from the ground. the airplane taxis to the start of the runway. the airplane will soon reach the rotation speed Vr . called the decision speed. Before take-oﬀ. so there must be a way to determine these velocities. Two graphs are displayed. the pilot needs to make a decision. There are several moments during the take-oﬀ run that deserve some special attention. It’s wiser to take oﬀ with the remaining engines. If the pilot decides to continue the take-oﬀ. while the rear wheels still stay on the ground. The speed of the aircraft at the screen height must be at least a certain climb-out speed (sometimes called safety speed) Vscr to ensure a safe climb. the take-oﬀ has not yet been completed. the distance to stop is small. Take-Oﬀ 2. the aircraft is safe from obstacles like trees or buildings. some one needs to write the manual. until the desired pitch angle θreq is reached. Graph 1 is the distance you need to stop if you apply full brakes at the given velocity. A short moment later the lift-oﬀ speed Vlof is reached. The intermediate point. the pilot gives the engines maximum power.1: Clariﬁcation of decision speed. This is the speed at which the wheels no longer touch the ground. 4 . However. For a brief moment the aircraft will have a certain constant rotational speed qrot . When clearance is given by the control tower. It is the last moment at which the airplane can still stop its take-oﬀ. At this height. For high velocities stopping requires to much runway space. In case of an engine failure it might be worth staying on ground. At that moment its velocity is V0 = 0.2. At this point the pilot pulls the nose of the aircraft up. Figure 2. But before they can ﬂy. At a certain velocity Vdec . The aircraft still needs to reach the screen height Hscr . If engine failure occurs at low velocities. Let’s take a look at ﬁgure 2. So it is preferable to stop. which is usually 35 or 50 feet.2 Decision Speed All the velocities that were mentioned in the previous paragraph are given to the pilot by the aircraft manual.

The ground also reﬂects the vortices our wing creates. The distance you need to either stop or to take oﬀ is called the balanced ﬁeld length. (2. The ground eﬀect is therefore considered to be a positive eﬀect for airplanes.2: Forces acting on the aircraft during ground run. The screen height is usually equal to the minimum velocity plus a safety factor. These forces are shown in ﬁgure 2. We assume that the runway is horizontal. Figure 2. except the normal force N and the gear drag Dg . 2. partially canceling them.3. you should brake if you’re able to. g dt (2.2. So Vscr = jVmin . But what can we say about this gear drag? We can assume that it is proportional to the normal force N . where for most aircrafts j = 1. The rotation speed Vr is then set at the velocity such that Vscr is still reached at the screen height if engine failure occurs. If you are not.2. When you apply normal aerodynamics equations to calculate the aerodynamic forces L and D.3. This coeﬃcient depends on the wheels of the aircraft. so Dg = µN = µ(W − L). If we now look at the forces acting on the aircraft in horizontal direction. The lift therefore goes up. you have to lift oﬀ. Since the aircraft is still on the ground. we will ﬁnd W dV = T − D − Dg = T − D − µ(W − L). we look at the forces acting on the aircraft. 5 . The air which our wings push down is pushed back up by the ground.1) where µ is the friction coeﬃcient.3 Equations of Motion for Ground Phase To learn more about the ground phase. as well as the environment. If that engine fails. that there is no wind and once more that the thrust is in the direction of the velocity. We have seen all forces already in the chapter about cruise.but if you continue accelerating. Now let’s look at the other velocities. This causes the induced drag to decrease. you should still take oﬀ and hope there is an empty ﬁeld ahead of you in which you can make an emergency landing. You may also be wondering what the procedure is if you only have one engine on your aircraft.2) It is important to note the other assumptions we have made. there is the so-called ground eﬀect. This causes the eﬀective angle of attack to increase. you should be careful.

respectively. The left side of this equation indicates the power that is put into the system. Since the speed is constant in a steady climb.2) ¯ ¯ ¯ where T .4. drag and gear drag as a function of the velocity during a ground run. we know that dVscr = 0 and thus also dVscr = 0. In practice. We ﬁrst look at the ground phase. (T − D)sair = 2g (2.4. D and Dg are the mean thrust. To ﬁnd the distance needed to reach the screen height. drag and gear drag only have to be calculated at one given velocity to ﬁnd the 2 take-oﬀ distance corresponding to the ground phase. while the right side shows the change in kinetic and potential energy. To ﬁnd this. From dynamics we know that a ds = V dV .4.4.2. Now let’s consider the airborne part of the take-oﬀ. or equivalently W γscr = (T − D)scr = (T − D). We will ﬁnd sair Vscr (T − D)ds = 0 Vlof W d(V 2 ) + 2g Hscr W dH. the mean acceleration a is approximately equal to the acceleration at ¯ √ 1 2Vlof . 2g 2g (2.5) W ¯ ¯ (Vscr − Vlof ) + W Hscr . we ﬁrst have to rewrite the equation of motion to W dV W dV ds W dV W d(V 2 ) T − D − W sin γ = = = V = . we once more integrate. which is equal to ¯ a= ¯ g ¯ ¯ ¯ T − D − Dg . where we have used sin γscr ≈ γscr . We use this mean acceleration because it is very hard to express the thrust.4.7) To ﬁnd the total take-oﬀ distance.4) where the variable H indicates the height.4. 0 (2. ¯ ¯ This implies that (T − D)scr − W sin γscr = 0.4 Take-Oﬀ Distance Now we are curious about the amount of runway the aircraft needs for the entire take-oﬀ procedure.6) ¯ ¯ At the screen height we should have reached a steady climb. however. 2¯ lof a (2. simply add up the airborne distance sair to the ground run distance sground .1) Here the quantity a is the mean acceleration. So the thrust. being (T − D)ds = W W d(V 2 ) + W sin γ ds = d(V 2 ) + W dH. 2g (2. W (2. drag and gear drag. Rewriting gives Vlof sground = 0 1 V dV = a a ¯ Vlof V dV = 0 1 2 V .4. Now we ﬁnd that γscr sair = 2 2 Vscr − Vlof + Hscr . (2. 6 .3) g dt g ds dt g ds 2g ds Rewriting again will now give the so-called equation of energy. We therefore may assume that (T − D) = 2 (T −D)scr .

denoted by RCst . We 2 3 therefore need to minimize CD /CL . Since a propeller aircraft is a low speed aircraft.1.1 Rate of Climb In the previous chapter we saw the energy equation. It can be found by using the deﬁnition of the rate of climb.3) 7 .1) Let’s assume we want to minimize climb time for a small propeller aircraft. Your engines produce a certain amount of excess power (T − D) V . The result will be tclimb H tclimb = 0 dt = 0 1 dH.1. The reason for this is in fact quite logical. so we can assume RC = RCst = Ps .3) where Ps is the speciﬁc excess power. climbing). We can thus rewrite this as T −D 1 d(V 2 ) V = RC + RC. the quantity d(V 2 )/2 = V dV is small enough to be neglected.1.3.2. The corresponding true airspeed V and equivalent airspeed Ve will be V = 2 1 W ρ CL S and Ve = V ρ = ρ0 2 1 W .1) dt 2g dH dt dt Note that we have made a change of variable to the height H in the middle term. this energy is spend on increasing the potential energy (that is. (3. In this case d(V 2 ) = 0.2. (3.2) Since propeller aircrafts have a constant power available. so the so-called stationary rate of climb. (3. If we diﬀerentiate it with respect to the time t we will ﬁnd ds W d(V 2 ) dH dH (T − D) = +W . The resulting lift coeﬃcient will be CL = 3CD0 πAe. 3. The kinetic correction factor then becomes 1. So we need to maximize Ps = Pa − Pr P a DV P a CD V Pa = − = − = − W W L W CL W 2 2 W CD 3 . A correction factor is then necessary to indicate the diﬀerence between the stationary and non-stationary rate of climb. we need to maximize the rate of climb. RC (3. ρ S CL (3. the kinetic energy increases.4) RC 2g dH The factor on the right hand side of this equation is called the kinetic correction factor. denoted by RC = dH/dt. To do this. the left side of the equation is constant. It is the excess power per Newton of aircraft weight. We did this because we wanted to express things as a function of the rate of climb. so less energy can be spend on increasing the potential energy. ρ0 CL S (3.2. Climbing Flight 3. will be RCst = Pa − Pr T −D V = = Ps . Combining this with the previous equation will RCst 1 d(V 2 ) =1+ .2) W 2g dH Let’s brieﬂy consider stationary ﬂight. If V increases.2 Climb Time The climb time is the time it takes to reach a given height. If V is constant.1. W W (3.

g dt W Combining the previous two equations will result in a rather simple relation.3. This is E = WH + W 2 V . To minimize the climb time.4) (3. Especially supersonic aircrafts make good use of this fact. which stays constant during a zoom ﬂight. or by pulling the aircraft’s nose up. = RC H 0 1+ RCst dH.3. So to climb as eﬃcient as possible. This goes according to dEh dH 1 d(V 2 ) V dV = + = V sin γ + . dt W (3. In this way he spends as few time as possible in the transonic ﬂight regime. When they are climbing they will. when pilots in real low-speed aircrafts climb. resulting in a low speciﬁc excess power.3. To minimize this eﬀect.2.5) (3. At transonic ﬂight speeds the drag D is very high.3. 3. A ﬂight procedure where one type of energy is converted to the other is called a zoom ﬂight. it has proven to work in practice. if the airplane converts all its kinetic energy to potential energy. These energies can be easily converted to each other by initiating a dive. This is dEh T −D = V = Ps . 8 . dt dt 2g dt g dt We can rewrite the equation of motion of the aircraft to T −D 1 dV = − sin γ. 2g (3. we should maximize the speciﬁc excess power for every H. In fact. It is therefore important to maximize the rate of climb over the entire climb. Although this is rather counterintuitive.3) So the time derivative of the speciﬁc energy is the speciﬁc excess power. W 2g (3. we will get a very low value at another time. We now look at how this energy height changes in time. How long would that take us? This is suddenly a rather easy problem. they usually keep a constant indicated airspeed. reach the transonic barrier. But how to do that is a question we’re currently not able to answer.6) tclimb = Ps 0 So the conclusion is simple. (3. To indicate the eﬀect of zoom ﬂights. a supersonic aircraft initiates a dive as soon as he reaches the transonic barrier.1) If we deﬁne the speciﬁc energy Eh as the energy per Newton of weight. But what about high speed aircrafts? In this case the climb time becomes H V dV g0 dH tclimb = 0 1 dH. we look at the energy E of the airplane. at some point. we will ﬁnd Eh = 1 E = H + V 2.3. a dive is necessary. then its height H will be equal to the speciﬁc energy Eh of the aircraft. Let’s suppose we want to reach a certain energy height with our aircraft.3. (3.3 Zoom Flight and Energy Height When an aircraft is ﬂying.2) We see that Eh is more or less similar to the height. The speciﬁc energy Eh is therefore also called the energy height. it has both kinetic energy and potential energy. In fact.4) To maximize the climb time is very diﬃcult now.Here we see that the optimal equivalent airspeed remains constant for diﬀerent heights. The time it takes will be He 1 dHe . If we maximize the rate of climb at one given time.

1. it ﬁrst must descend. several other things to slow down the aircraft can be used.1: Forces acting on the aircraft during descend. ¯ (4.2. Also spoilers can be used to reduce lift. To ﬁnd an equation for the distance. When the aircraft makes a touchdown on the ground. Landing 4. If the airplane is going too fast. Figure 4. and preferably as smooth as possible. Before an airplane can land.2) 2g W W 9 .1 The Procedure It’s nice to get an airplane up in the air. as is be shown in ﬁgure 4. The oﬃcial landing procedure starts when the aircraft reaches the screen height. This part starts when the aircraft is at the screen height. this is W dV = T − D + W sin γ . Depending on the aircraft. The approach velocity should ¯ ¯ minimally be at Va = 1.2. the pilot will change the power setting of the engine. The engines can switch to reverse thrust. the pilot will pull up the nose of the aircraft. we ﬁrst have to look at the equation of motion.4. 4.2 Energy Landing Equation Just like in the landing.15Vmin . it should have a touchdown velocity of about Vt = 1. When the aircraft almost hits the ground. But what goes up must come down. After that it will hit the brakes. which is about 50 feet for landings. deﬁned ¯ as γ = −γ.3Vmin . First we look at the part of the landing in which the aircraft is still in the air. (4. Therefore a landing is a part of every ﬂight. decreasing the rate of descent drastically. the pilot will turn oﬀ the power on the engines and the aircraft will ﬂare.1) g dt Let’s divide this equation by the weight ﬁrst. If we then multiply it by dt and multiply again V = ds/dt we will get 1 T −D T −D d(V 2 ) = ds + sin γ ds = ¯ ds − dH. If the descend angle is wrong. The ﬂight path and approach velocity are controlled by the pilot. For a landing aircraft. The ﬂare is the maneuver in which the pilot pulls up the nose of the aircraft. we would like to know the distance an aircraft needs to land. in case of any unexpected events. It does this with a certain descend angle γ . This angle is usually γ = 3◦ . Both mechanisms will be discussed later in this chapter.

4 Braking For the aircraft to come to a full stop. That is why the wheels of an aircraft are tested very well before they are used. The minus sign on the right hand side is present because this mean acceleration is negative.4.2.3.Now we can integrate from the screen height (with height Hscr and approach velocity Va ) to the ground (with height 0 and touchdown velocity Vt ). it is a good approximation √ to take values of D.3. If the wheel does not slip. how much distance does it need to brake? To ﬁnd this distance.4) This equation is called the energy landing equation. (The aircraft is slowing down. then V = ωr.3) ¯ ¯ Just like we did in previous parts.1) slip = V 10 . as is shown in ﬁgure 4. Just like during take-oﬀ. The wheel with radius r will then get an angular velocity ω. so (T − D)scr = W γ = −W γa . The so-called slip is therefore deﬁned as the dimensionless factor V − ωr . Therefore ¯ ¯ ¯ (T − D)t = −Dt = −W CD . Using the energy landing equation. a 2¯ a (4.3 Brake Distance When the aircraft safely touches down on the ground.) In fact. so Tt = 0. we once more use the equation a ds = V dV . It is useful to know how those brakes work.2) W W where Trev is the magnitude of the reverse thrust. brakes are used.2. the value of sair can be determined. The brake distance then is 0 sground = Vt V2 V dV =− t . To do this. 4. This time we assume ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ that the value of T − D is the average of the value at screen height (T − D)scr and the value at touchdown ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ (T − D)t . At touchdown the pilot will have put out the engines. (4. The result will be Vt2 − 2g 2 Va + Hscr 2g = ¯ ¯ T −D sair W (4. If the wheel does slip. where ¯ γa is the approach angle. g D + Dg + Trev (4. At screen height the aircraft is in a steady descent.3) 4. It will be sground = W Vt2 ¯ ¯ ¯ . Let’s suppose the ﬂoor will move with a velocity V . The left hand side of the equation is proportional to the change in energy. This is because once more energy is involved. these two values are not equal.2. it can be expressed as g ¯ g ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ a=− ¯ D + Dg − T = − D + Dg + Trev . (4.1) Note that we have again used the mean acceleration. 2 Substituting the previous equation in the one before it will give the brake distance. we have used the mean thrust T and drag D. while the middle side is related to the work done on the aircraft. Combining all the data gives CL t Vt2 − 2g 2 Va + Hscr 2g = ¯ ¯ T −D 1 sair = − sair γa + ¯ W 2 CD CL . t (4. Dg and Trev at a velocity of 1 2Vt as the mean values.3. engineers put them on a ﬂoor which is able to move.

Figure 4. Stable equilibrium points have a positive value of dµ/d(slip). so N = W − L = 0. However. From examining vertical forces we ﬁnd that N = W −L. (4. equilibrium points can be found for ω. When the aircraft touches down. deploy the spoilers and brake in such a way that the friction coeﬃcient is as high as possible. A stable equilibrium point means that ω will return to its original value after small deviations. Given a certain brake torque. So it’s wise to allow some slip. Unstable equilibrium points have a negative value of dµ/d(slip). To solve this problem. Now let’s examine the forces acting on the wheel.2: Forces/Moments acting on the wheel of an aircraft. This ground drag is equal to Dg = µN = µ (W − L) . We want to come to a stop as fast as possible. so we intent to maximize the ground drag.4. but not too much. µ decreases again. If the slip increases even further. This brake torque can be set. being the ground drag. while others are unstable. spoilers are used. For unstable equilibrium points the opposite happens. the slip diverges away from the equilibrium point.2) where µ is the friction coeﬃcient of the wheel.3) where Qbrake is the brake torque applied by the braking system. As soon as you touch down. There is only one horizontal force. To increase the ground drag. We do this by maximizing the friction coeﬃcient. some of these equilibrium points are stable. you don’t only need a high friction coeﬃcient. Knowing ω. It turns out that µ highly depends on the slip. To prevent this. they disturb the airﬂow and decrease the lift enormously. at a certain point the coeﬃcient reaches its maximum µmax . When small deviations occur. If they are deployed. dt (4. If we now examine the moments acting on the aircraft.4. the lift is still approximately equal to the weight. 11 . You also need a normal force. For small slip values the friction coeﬃcient still increases. This could result in a rapid increase in slip and thus a rapid decrease in ground drag. These are small deﬂectable plates on top of the wing. So the landing procedure can now be determined. However. we will ﬁnd that µ (W − L) r − Qbrake = I dω . also the slip can be determined. aircrafts are often equipped with an anti-lock braking system (ABS).

The yg -axis can now be found by using the right-hand rule. The xg -axis is deﬁned as pointing north. 5. Now let’s shift the origin of the geodetic system to the center of gravity (COG) of the aircraft. we have an easy relation here. The yb axis coincides with the latitudinal axis of the aircraft. Now we the road splits up in two paths. Let’s call E the matrix i j expressed as T k . we will derive the equations of motion for a symmetric ﬂight.2. We have assumed we’re in a symmetric ﬂight.1 System Deﬁnitions In the previous chapters we have derived equations of motion in a rather simple way: By drawing a picture and examining forces.2. This gets increasingly complicated if the ﬂight is more three-dimensional.2. while the zg -axis points downward. We can once more take a time derivative to ﬁnd the acceleration. (5. That’s why it is useful to deﬁne various coordinate systems. They can only change in direction. The velocity can then be expressed as V=r= V ˙ 0 0 Ea . The xb -axis then coincides with the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (forward direction being positive). That’s why we’ll mostly use the air path system (subscript a).2. We could rotate the coordinate system to the body system of the aircraft (subscript b). Coordinate Systems 5. Now we rotate the coordinate system such that the xa -axis points in the direction of the velocity. which has subscript g. Since the xa -axis points per deﬁnition in the direction of the velocity vector.2) Now we see why it is convenient to use the air path system. Its positive direction is such that the zb -axis (found with the right-hand rule) points downward. We start with the geodetic system. the za -axis points downward. (5. Just like in the body system.1) where Ea = ia ja ka . The body system isn’t very useful in performance. as they are unit vectors. (5. The origin of the coordinate system is at any point on the surface of the earth.5) .5. when something rotates. γ 0 0 ˙ 12 (5. Expressing ˙ Ea in γ gives ˙ Ea = −kγ 0 iγ . But what is Ea ? We know that the components of Ea can not change in magnitude.2.4) ˙ ˙ The rotation operator R is deﬁned such that 0 0 −γ ˙ ˙ Ea = 0 0 0 Ea = R Ea .3) ˙ Note that we had to use the product rule. having subscript e. (5. The position of any point in the air path system can be r= x y z Ea . so the only rotation is when γ changes.2 Equations of Motion for Symmetric Flight T To demonstrate the use of these coordinate systems. to the center of the earth. This is ˙ ˙ a=V= V 0 0 Ea + V 0 ˙ 0 Ea . Now we have found the moving earth system.

3.8) These are exactly the equations of motion we already know. Previously we have only considered symmetric ﬂights. We once more assume the thrust is in the direction of the velocity. We now have E2 = [γ] E1 = [γ] [χ] Ee .7) We can now use F = ma.6) ˙ We can also express the forces in the air path system. But we haven’t reached the air path system yet. So we still need to rotate around the x-axis by the aerodynamic roll angle µ. Looking at the x and z-components however.2.3. This relation must hold for all three components of these vectors. We go from the moving earth system to the air path system in several steps.) We now have rotated over the so-called azimuth angle χ.2) where the transformation matrix [γ] is derived similar to [χ]. The result will be Ea = [µ] E2 = [µ] [γ] [χ] Ee . To continue.3 Switching Between Systems Suppose we have certain coordinates in the moving earth system and want to transform them to the air path system. The equation would then simply be E1 = [χ] Ee . (5. We give this intermediate system number 2.3. We call this intermediate system E1 .2.2. How do we do this? The key to answering this question. such that the x-axis actually coincides with the velocity vector V. But now we consider any type of ﬂight. we will ﬁnd ˙ a= V 0 0 Ea + V ˙ 0 0 REa = V 0 0 Ea + 0 ˙ 0 −V γ Ea = V ˙ 0 −V γ Ea . but for diﬃcult situations this approach is actually a lot easier than what we did in the previous chapters.3) We have now expressed the air path system as a function of the moving earth system. such that the x-axis points in the direction of the velocity vector as much as possible. we rotate system 1 around the y-axis over the ﬂight path angle γ. will give two interesting relations. (5. 13 . is the transformation matrix. Mixing up the order of the matrices will give wrong results. being ˙ mV = T − D − W sin γ. denoted by [χ]. 5. First we rotate the moving earth system about its z-axis. We’re almost at the air path system. y and z in the above equations. 0 0 1 (5. So this method actually works. It is very important to note the order of the transformation matrices.If we insert this in the relation for a.1) The matrix on the right-hand side (the one with the sines and cosines) is the transformation matrix. and mV γ = L − W cos γ. We can now show that cos χ sin χ 0 x y z E1 = x cos χ − y sin χ x sin χ + y cos χ 1 Ee = x y z − sin χ cos χ 0 Ee . ˙ (5. It may seem like a lot of work now. There’s only one remaining thing that we have neglected in all previous chapters. (5. Looking at the y-component will give 0 = 0. Working everything out gives F = T − D − W sin γ 0 L − W cos γ Ea . (5. Note that we could have removed the matrix with the x. It transforms Ee to E1 . which isn’t altogether interesting. (The y-component of V should then be 0.

5) (5.6) These equations are useful when describing many ﬂight types.4. ˙ mV γ = L cos µ − W cos γ. They don’t take into account forces/moments caused by the elevators. we ﬁnd three equation. they do have their constraints. the value of Ea has been drastically changed. To be able to work with these equations. (5. (5.4. First we need to consider the acceleration of ˙ the aircraft.4. Using this fact. So keep that in mind when applying them.1) p Ea = R Ea . we need to look at the forces acting on the aircraft. (5.4) Note that now also the order of the matrices has reversed.go from the air path system to the moving earth system? That is relatively simple.4. T T T (5.4.3. being ˙ mV = T − D − W sin γ. we can write Ee = ([µ] [γ] [χ]) −1 Ea = [χ] −1 [γ] −1 [µ] −1 Ea = [χ] [γ] [µ] Ea .4. All the transformation matrices are orthonormal matrices (meaning that their columns are linearly independent and all have unit length). Luckily we know how to convert something from Ee to Ea . These are F = T + D + L + W = T − D 0 −L Ea + 0 0 W Ee .4. q −p 0 where p is the rotational velocity about the x-axis.4. ˙ (5. By examining all three components.8) (5.4. 14 . This is still given by equation 5.3. Now we know the acceleration of the aircraft.3) Now we can derive the general equations of motion.9) (5. If we work everything out and use F = ma we will get T −D ˙ 0 −L Ea + 0 0 W [χ] [γ] [µ] Ea = mV T T T 0 0 Ea + mV 0 0 R Ea .7) (5. 5. By examining the aircraft motion. We can use transformation matrices to rewrite these equations to a more useful form. We can now derive the general equations of motion for any type of ﬂight. we can ﬁnd that 0 r −q ˙ Ea = −r 0 (5. These are ˙ T − D − W sin γ = mV . the ailerons or the rudder. It’s wisest to use Ea as the coordinate system.4) W cos γ sin µ = mV r.2) Now we see why we need the transformation matrices. mV χ cos γ = L sin µ. q is the rotational velocity about the y-axis and r is the rotational velocity about the z-axis.4 General Equations of Aircraft Motion We have derived the equations of motion for symmetric ﬂights previously in this chapter. Any orthonormal matrix A has the property A−1 = AT . However. L − W cos γ cos µ = mV q. However.But what if we want to reverse the transformation .2. we need to express them in the same coordinate system.

6) ˙ 0 −V γ − Vw sin γ Ea . If. So its speed is also measured with respect to the air.1. 15 . During take-oﬀ the aircraft needs to reach the lift-oﬀ speed Vlof to be able to lift oﬀ from the ground.1. measured with respect to the ground.5) (6. If you land with headwinds. Therefore V w = Vw 0 0 Eg . The situation is virtually the same for landings. (6. (6. They now are ˙ H = V sin γ and s = V cos γ − Vw . But what if the aircraft is near the ground? We ﬁrst consider the take-oﬀ and then look at the landing. however.1. and thus a much shorter runway. so Eg = 0. which is ˙ ˙ ˙ ˙ a = Vg = V + Vw = V 0 0 Ea + V 0 ˙ ˙ 0 Ea + −Vw 0 0 Eg . this velocity can be expressed as Vg = V + Vw . But not only the equations of motion are slightly diﬀerent. So if you take oﬀ with headwind. If you land with the wind blowing in your back.1 Equations of Motion An aircraft ﬂies in air.1) where Vw is the velocity of the wind with respect to the ground. This is because Eg doesn’t change. We usually assume this velocity is directed parallel to the ground.4) ˙ V γ + Vw sin γ . So there is a diﬀerence.2) To derive the equations of motion.7) 6. Therefore its preferable to take oﬀ with headwinds.1. ˙ (6. it needs a velocity of V = 120kts.1.1. If we assume the aircraft is in a symmetric ﬂight. Eﬀects of Wind 6. Let’s suppose Vlof = 100kts. and therefore it’s much easier to come to a full stop.1. ˙ (6. this velocity is not equal to the velocity of the aircraft with respect to the ground. we look at the acceleration of the aircraft. we can rewrite the acceleration as ˙ ˙ a = V − Vw cos γ Using Newton’s second law this time results in T − D − W sin γ = L − W cos γ = W g W g ˙ ˙ V − Vw cos γ . then the aircraft only needs to have a velocity of V = 80kts with respect to the ground to take oﬀ. In case of winds. however. you need a much lower velocity. then you need a much greater distance to come to a complete stop. it’s relatively simple to calculate the eﬀects of it.6. (6. (6. This speed is measured with respect to the wind.2 Taking Oﬀ and Landing When the airplane is in the air. If there is a headwind of 20kts.3) ˙ ˙ Note that we have not written the term involving Eg . in such a way that the aircraft experiences headwind. the wind comes from the back of the aircraft. The speed of the aircraft is. you have a much lower velocity with respect to the ground. Instead. Also the kinematics equations have changed. ˙ These are the equations of motion if the airplane experiences headwind.

Figure 6.1.1: Microburst.3.1) V = dt dH dt dH dH Substituting this in equation 6. and more or less plummets to the ground. When the ﬂow of water hits the sink.3. they have caused multiple aircrafts to crash. (6. The aircraft has then lost almost all of its speed. Since RD = −RC and RDst = −RDst we ﬁnd RD 1 + V dVw V dV − g dH g dH = RDst .5 will give W g V RC g dV dVw RC − RC cos γ dH dH = T − D − W sin γ.5) This once more shows that RD > RDst in case you are descending with headwinds.3. When it passes the center of the microburst. like is displayed in ﬁgure 6. we derive an equation which involves the wind gradient dVw /dH. the situation is approximately the same. When an aircraft is ﬂying into a microburst. It’s similar to the water coming out of a tap. As the air comes close to the ground. it diverges in multiple directions.3) Rewriting V sin γ = RC and bringing terms within brackets will give RC 1 + V dV V dVw − g dH g dH = RCst .4) Climbs are usually performed at an approximately constant velocity. the direction of the wind suddenly seems to reverse. So to climb faster. The situation is similar for descending. it moves away in all directions. It therefore slows down a bit with respect to the ground.2) Multiplying by V /W will then give dV dVw − cos γ dH dH + V sin γ = T V − DV Pa − Pr = = RCst . (6. 6.1. it is better to have headwinds. it ﬁrst experiences a headwind. W W (6. To show this. Now look at the term dVw /dH. so we can assume that dV /dH = 0. 16 . It’s better to climb/descend with headwinds.3 Wind Gradients When climbing or descending. then dVw /dH < 0 and thus RC < RCst . Although microbursts are relatively rare phenomena. First we ˙ ˙ rewrite V and Vw to dV dH dV dV dV ˙ ˙ = = RC andidentically Vw = RC.6. (6.3.3. If the wind is in your back. (6. Winds usually blow harder at higher altitudes. In case of headwinds this means that dVw /dH > 0 and thus RC > RCst .4 Microbursts A microburst is a column of descending air.

increase the angle of attack α and increase the thrust T . 7. After a while we will stall and fall to the ground. If we increase the thrust enough to compensate for the additional drag D. But if we do that too. But we have already mentioned that the equations of motion don’t consider rudder and aileron deﬂection. In a real airplane we also need to compensate with the rudder to prevent adverse yaw. but we can’t do this indeﬁnitely. So in every horizontal turn you make you feel slightly heavier.2 Turn Radius and Load Factor So we now know how to rotate an aircraft. Of course we can increase α even more.7. The third method seems to be a good one. This means we will slow down and reduce lift. Turning Flight 7. (7. Since cos µ will decrease we ﬁnd that γ < 0. Let’s examine the second equation. we won’t drop to the ground. But how much space do we need? From physics we know that Fc = mV 2 /R. If we do this in such a way that L cos µ stays constant. from the equations of motion we can ﬁnd that W = L cos µ = L cos φ.1 Turn Strategy Flying in a straight line tends to get boring after a while.2. (7. g R (7. where Fc is the centrifugal force and R is the turn radius. Instead. this option isn’t a very good one. To see the eﬀect. Since we are considering a horizontal turn.3) If we now use the fact that µ = φ and also the mathematical relation sin2 x + cos2 x = 1 we can express the turn radius in the load factor.2. Now we can deﬁne the load factor n as n= L 1 V2 1 = = . Since µ = 0 also sin µ = 0 and thus χ = 0.1) In a horizontal turn the relation L = W doesn’t hold anymore. ˙ Since the angle of attack α increased also the drag D increased.2. So you need to be able to turn the aircraft. we are actually able to perform a perfect horizontal turn. Therefore V < 0. Since that is rather unwanted. In this case it’s equal to µ. • Let’s now change µ. ˙ So we will turn. How should we do this? We consider three options • Change µ.2. g n2 − 1 Note that always n > 1. • In addition to changing µ also increase the angle of attack α. But now look at the ﬁrst equation of motion. The centrifugal force therefore is ˙ Fc = L sin µ = W V2 . W cos φ g R sin µ (7. So this isn’t a good option either. we examine the three-dimensional equations of motion that were derived previously. we won’t slow down.2) where φ is a variable which is used to indicate the bank angle in horizontal turns. and it limits your possible destinations. The result will be V2 R= √ . Now look at the third equation.4) 17 . we know that γ = γ = 0. Therefore we are performing a perfect horizontal turn. That ˙ means we start plummeting to the ground.

5) So if you want to make a fast turn you actually have to ﬂy as slow as possible.5) In both cases the maximum velocity in a turn will be Vnmax = 2 1 nmax W .3. W CD (7.1) If we combine these two equations.3 Power During a Turn We know that we need to increase the engine power during a turn.3.6) 18 . 7.4) However.2 and the relation T = D we ﬁnd that nmax = T CL . ρ CL S (7. for low velocities the maximum load factor isn’t bounded by the power available.2) 2 1 nW . So this determines the maximum load factor nmax . CL (7.3.3. This may seem counterintuitive. The angular velocity of the turn Ω is simply equal to Ω = V /R = χ.We would also like to know how long a turn takes.3. W 2W (7. 3 ρ CL S 3 (7. ρ CL S (7. the higher the power required. Using equation 7.3. we can ﬁnd the power required to be Pr = DV = 2 2 CD (nW ) . But when you’re driving a bike or a car you also slow down when making a turn.3) √ So we ﬁnd that the power required is proportional to n n. It is then bounded by the maximum lift coeﬃcient CLmax according to nmax = Lmax ρV 2 SCLmax = . Of course our engine has a maximum power available. Knowing this. = 2π = 2π √ Ω V g n2 − 1 (7. So the higher the load factor.2. But by how much is this? We know that L = nW . So it actually makes sense to all of us. To do something fast you need to decrease your speed.3. so from that we can derive that V = We can also express the drag as D= CD nW. we know that the time it takes to make a complete 360◦ turn is ˙ T2π = 2π R V .

Suppose we have a set of rotating blades. increase the rotor blade size or simply ﬂy at a lower altitude. the thrust produced by the rotor blades T must be equal to the weight W .1. is 0. This would make the so-called ideal power Pid = eout − ein = 1 1 2 m (V0 + 2Vi ) − mV02 = 2mVi (V0 + Vi ) = T (V0 + Vi ) . Identically. being the velocity far away from the disk.2. So we also know that Pid = T Vi = W Vi .4) Phov where Phov is the actual power that is necessary to hover. This enables helicopters to hover. 2ρπr2 (8. (8. (8.3) So to reduce the ideal power. deﬁned as Pid M= . Let’s deﬁne the induced velocity Vi as Vi = V1 − V0 .7. which has already been treated in the Aerodynamics A course. We can now show that V2 = V1 and also V3 − V2 = Vi .1) In a hovering ﬂight. while point 1 is just a little bit to the left of the disk. We can also show that the thrust now is T = 2mVi = 2ρπr2 Vi . and that the ﬂow is incompressible and irrotational. We can consider 4 points now. 19 . For most modern helicopters the ﬁgure of merit is about M = 0. If we assume the velocity is evenly distributed over the actuator disk. These losses are all combined in one sign. (8. Point 0 is inﬁnitely far to the left of the disk. and the rate of power that goes in. So therefore the total velocity increment of the air is V3 − V0 = 2Vi . 2 2 (8.2. There are always losses.2) 2ρπr2 The ideal power of the helicopter now becomes Pid = W Vi = W W .1 Actuator Disk Theory In a helicopter. we can also ﬁnd that W Vi = . where m is the mass ﬂow of air that goes through the disk and r is the actuator disk radius. point 2 is just to the right of the disk and point 3 is inﬁnitely far to the right.8. In case of hovering ﬂight. But how can we calculate this thrust? One way to do this is by using the actuator disk theory. but by rotating blades. we need to decrease our weight. the initial velocity V0 .2. Helicopters 8.2 Helicopter Power How much power would the engine need to provide to hover? In an ideal situation the power would be the diﬀerence between the rate of power that comes out of the system. lift isn’t created by the wings. we can derive a few simple relations.1) 8.2. We will brieﬂy repeat that theory here. This is the so-called ﬁgure of merit M . If we apply T = W to the last equation of the previous paragraph. However. called the actuator disk. the ideal power isn’t the actual power that is needed from the engine.

The variable Pi is usually approximated using Pi = kPid . while the surface area of the blades is nRc.3) where Pi is the induced component of the power and Pp is the power necessary to compensate for the proﬁle drag of the blades.2. Since this velocity is not directed horizontally. Figure 8. The power then becomes R R P =n 0 Vi dT + n 0 Ωr dD = T Vi + Pp = Pi + Pp .3. where the correction factor k is often about 1. Due to the induced velocity. we can write R R cd σ ¯ 1 3 3 (8. the air has a certain inﬂow angle φ. Since the rotor rotates with an angular velocity of Ω. The surface area of the rotor disk is simply πR2 .8. Also a pitch angle θ and an angle of attack α can be distinguished.3.3. If cdp is the proﬁle drag component of the rotor blade piece. Together they form the resultant velocity Vr . Also R is the length of the entire rotor blade. Such a piece is shown in ﬁgure 8.4) Pp = n Ωr dD = n cdp ρ (Ωr) cdr = p ΩR2 πR2 . deﬁned as nRc .2) where we this time have approximated cos φ ≈ 1 and sin φ ≈ tan φ = Vi /Ωr.1: Motions and forces in the blade element theory. (8. The power that is needed to keep the rotor rotating is dP = dD Ωr = (dL sin φ + dD cos φ) Ωr ≈ dT Vi + dD Ωr. So let’s look at an inﬁnitely small piece of a rotor blade. Using those forces we can integrate to ﬁnd the thrust and drag of the full rotor blades. (8.3. we integrate over one entire rotor blade and multiply by the number of blades n. It’s the part of the rotor disk that is ﬁlled with blades. 20 . The power component Pp is a bit more diﬃcult to determine.5) σ= πR2 There is a simple physical meaning behind this rotor solidity. To ﬁnd the total power that is needed for all the rotor blades.3 Blade Element Theory In the blade element theory we look at an inﬁnitely small piece of a rotor blade and derive the lift dL and drag dD acting on that piece. (8.1. The small bit of thrust dT acting on the rotor blade part now is dT = dL cos φ − dD sin φ ≈ dL. the small piece of rotor blade has a velocity component to the left of Ωr. there is a downward pointing velocity component of Vi .3. The factor σ is called the rotor ¯ solidity. at a distance r from the center. (8.1) where we have approximated cos φ ≈ 1 and sin φ ≈ 0. 2 8 0 0 Here the sign cdp indicates the mean drag coeﬃcient for the entire rotor.

That’s why it is simply approximated by Pdrag = H0 V cos αd = Phov 4. (8. First of all a drag force H0 acts on the rotor disk. Of course we also multiply by the number of rotor blades n.4.7) . The total power that the engine now needs to provide is kT Vi + Pp + H0 V + Dpar V = Pi + Pp + Pdrag + Ppar . The angle with which the rotor disk is tilted forward is called the disk angle of attack αd . If a small piece of rotor moves in the same direction as the velocity of the helicopter.3. The induced power Pp even decreases if we ﬂy forward. The parasite drag. two things can occur.4 Forward Flight Helicopters would tend to get boring if they can only hover. ΩR (8. The power necessary to counteract this drag is 1 Ppar = Dbus V = CDbus ρV 3 Aref . Both situations are not really positive. 8 (8. than the two velocities need to be added up. It is also possible that the so-called retreating blade with velocity ΩR − V cos αd actually moves backward. This is the so-called parasite drag Dpar . Especially for high velocities this drag dominates.4. The velocity of a small blade element depends not only on the distance r from the rotor disk center. When doing this.4. To let helicopters ﬂy forward. Now we can draw our conclusions.4. The proﬁle power then becomes Pp = n 2π 2π 0 0 R c¯ σ 1 d 2 3 cdp ρ (Ωr + V cos αd sin µ) c Ωr dr dψ = p ρ (ΩR) πR2 1 + µ2 .8. We then divide by 2π to get the average proﬁle power for a certain rotor blade.4. To reduce drag it’s therefore best to make the helicopter bus as aerodynamic as possible. as the rotor disk is rotating quite rapidly. you have to keep in mind the gyroscopic eﬀect. however.2) What we do now is simply integrate over the entire rotor disk. as if there was a rotor blade at every small angle dψ. In the opposite case they need to be subtracted. (8. where the hover power is equal to Phov = c¯p σ d 3 ρ (ΩR) πR2 .5) In practice µmax ≈ 0. In general we can say that Vr = ΩR + V cos αd sin µ.4. They can also ﬂy forward. But the rest of the helicopter (the so-called bus) is also suspect to drag. 2 where CDbus is the drag coeﬃcient of the bus and Aref is a certain reference area. (8.4.1) Let’s look at the individual power components now. 21 (8. you ﬁrst have to rotate the rotor disk. 2 8 (8. strongly increases. It may occur that the blade facing headwind (the so-called advancing blade with velocity ΩR + V cos αd ) experiences a supersonic ﬂow. we experience drag.4) The sign µ indicates the so-called advance ratio and is deﬁned as µ= V cos αd .65µ2 .3) Note that the proﬁle power can also be written as Pp = Phov 1 + µ2 .6) The most important contribution to the drag is the parasite drag. So then Vr = ΩR + V cos αd . If the helicopter goes any faster. But it’s a bit more complicated this time. The drag power due to H0 is rather diﬃcult to determine. To ﬁnd an expression for the proﬁle drag Pp we can once more use the blade element theory. The values of Pp and Pdrag are fairly constant with increasing V . Since we’re ﬂying forward now. It also depends on the angle ψ it makes with respect to the direction of the velocity.

The vertical component of the lift vector still provides thrust. Therefore the pilot needs to decrease the pitch angle of the rotor blade as soon as engine failure occurs. the rotor blade hardly has any lift and can’t power itself. These forces are shown in ﬁgure 8. stall will occur and almost all lift will be gone. If the pilot doesn’t do anything.8. If.5 Autorotation What happens if the engine of the helicopter fails? It turns out that the helicopter will not fall to the ground. there isn’t enough height (and thus not enough potential energy) to reach the right velocity. But what if the pilot forgets to reduce the pitch? In this case the helicopter is in serious trouble. however.2: Forces acting on an autorotating rotorblade. Therefore the lift vector will be tilted in the forward direction. To explain why autorotation occurs. the descend speed will increase. the resultant velocity will also ¯ be tilted upward. This means that the resultant velocity vector will start to tilt upward. It will get a certain descend speed c. 22 .2. the pilot can change that kinetic energy into rotational velocity of the rotor blade. we examine the forces acting on the rotor blades. The rotor disk starts rotating itself. Instead. Since there is stall. Due to this descend speed. the pilot will probably not live to learn from his mistake. This however only happens if the pilot takes action. When suﬃcient velocity has been gathered. converting potential energy to kinetic energy. Since the induced velocity points upward. a phenomenon called autorotation occurs. the helicopter will start to lose height. When the engine fails. Figure 8. increasing the angle of attack. If the engine fails. but now the horizontal component powers the rotor blades. it will seem like the induced velocity now has magnitude ¯ c − Vi and is pointed upward. The only chance the pilot has is to start performing a forward ﬂight with the helicopter. The rotor disk rotates on its own.

Design Based on Load

2IHEqp8dNWwC.pdf

CATIA_奥迪R8汽车教程

Catia Mouse

Shape Design

Marechal

1994 Settles AIAA

Customer Focus and product Development

Us 2075042

Pa Van 3

- Read and print without ads
- Download to keep your version
- Edit, email or read offline

Flight Control. How airplanes are controlled.

Navigation for Profesional Pilots

Propeller

Aircraft Basics

IFR for Professional Pilots

Aircraft Design Configuration

Aircraft Structures II

Aircraft Control Systems

Aerodynamics of the Aeroplane

Caa No 107 Aircraft Power Plant Handbook

Aircraft Structures 1

Module 17 Propellers Part 66

Airplane Performance & Design

EASA PART 66 Module 11_turbine Aeroplane Aerodynamics,Structures and Systems

Understanding Aircraft Structures

Fundamentals of Jet Propulsion With Applications by Flack. R.D

Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance, Roskam

The Design of the Airplane -Darrol Stinton

Basic Avionics Presentation

Jet Engine Fundamental of Theory Design Operations

Jeppesen Aircraft Gas Turbine Powerplants Charles E Otis -©2002

Dale Crane Airframe Volume 1 Structures

Avionics

Aircraft Instruments (Pallett)

ASA.airframe.vol.2.Systems

A&p Technician Powerplant Text E-book _jeppesen

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

CANCEL

OK

You've been reading!

NO, THANKS

OK

scribd