This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

### Publishers

Scribd Selects Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

P. 1

Volume 2- conference-ICCS-X|Views: 1,507|Likes: 3

Published by Sameer Al-Subh

See more

See less

https://www.scribd.com/doc/56160595/Volume-2-conference-ICCS-X

12/06/2012

text

original

- THE FITTING OF BINNED AND CONDITIONAL INCOMPLETE MIXTURE DATA
- LOOKING AT OUTLIERS
- TESTING FOR AGGREGATION BIAS
- ON A GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION FOR GENERATING SCUI DISTRIBUTIONS
- IDENTIFYING ABERRANT VARIABLE FROM AN OUT-OF-CONTROL SIGNAL
- A NEW GENERALIZATION OF POLYA-EGGENBERGER DISTRIBUTION AND ITS APPLICATIONS
- DEALING WITH ROUNDED ZEROS IN COMPOSITIONAL DATA UNDER DIRICHLET MODELS
- REGRESSION BASED ESTIMATES FOR THE BOX-COX POWER TRANSFORMATION
- LONGITUDINAL DATA ANALYSIS USING NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION MODEL
- BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR SEASONAL ARMA MODELS: A GIBBS SAMPLING APPROACH
- A NEW THRESHOLD VALUE IN CURVE ESTIMATION BY WAVELET SHRINKAGE
- MODELLING THE IMPACT OF US STOCK MARKET ON ASEAN COUNTRIES STOCK MARKETS
- BAYESIAN MULTIPLE CHANGE-POINT ESTIMATION USING SAMC
- AN APPROPRIATE WEIGHT MODEL FOR FORECASTING FUZZY TIME SERIES AR(1) PROCESS
- ON TESTS OF FIT BASED ON GROUPED DATA
- SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLD HEADS IN EGYPT
- CALCULATION OF RUIN PROBABILITY IN RISK PROCESS USING DE VYLDER’S METHOD
- PRESERVING SEMANTIC CONTENT IN TEXT MINING USING MULTIGRAMS
- MEASUREMENT OF SCHOOLING DEVELOPMENT
- D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS PROFILE-BASED SENSITIVITY IN REGRESSION MODELS
- GENERALIZED ORDER STATISTICS FROM SOME DISTRIBUTIONS
- Shrinkage Estimation for Cumulative Logit Models
- List of Contributors

Anwar Hassan

PG Department of Statistics

University of Kashmir, Srinagar-India

E-mail: anwar.hassan5@gmail.com, anwar.hassan2007@gmail.com

Sheikh Bilal Ahmad

Department of Statistics

Amar Singh College, Srinagar, Kashmir-India

E-mail: sbilal_sbilal@yahoo.com

**ABSTRACT
**

In this paper, a new generalization of the Polya-Eggenberger distribution has been introduced by

compounding the Binomial distribution with the generalized Beta distribution of Π-kind defined

by Nadarajah and Kotz (2003). Some special cases, moment generating function and factorial

moments of the distribution have been derived in terms of generalized hypergeometric function.

Stirling numbers of second kind has been used to obtain the moments about zero. Finally, a

computer programme in R-Software has been used to ease the computations for estimating the

parameters of the distribution for data fitting and it has been shown that the distribution gives a

remarkably best fit as compared to other generalizations present in the literature.

**Keywords:** Binomial distribution, generalized Beta distribution of Π-kind, generalized Polya-

Eggenberger distribution, moment generating function, Chi-squre fitting.

**1. INTRODUCTION
**

Urn models have been used by many authors to describe several classical contagious

distributions. The first work seems to have been done by Eggenberger and Polya (1923). They

considered one Urn model and obtained Polya-Eggenberger and inverse Polya-Eggenberger

distributions. Janardan and Schaeffer (1977) have called these distributions as Markov-Polya

distributions. The sampling scheme used in deriving Polya’s distribution is known as Polya–

Eggenberger sampling schemes where we draw the balls with replacement, note the colour of the

ball drawn and add cadditional balls of the same colour before the next draw is performed.

Many generalization of the Polya-Eggenberger distribution are present in the literature,

almost all are derived through urn models. Janardan (1973) obtained quasi-Polya distribution by

introducing an urn model dependent on predetermined strategies. Again in 1975, Janardan used

two urn models with predetermined strategy but with Eggenberger and Polya sampling scheme

and obtained qusi-Polya distribution and inverse quasi-Polya distribution. Sen and Mishra (1996)

unified both the sampling schemes (direct and indirect) by introducing a new parameter to obtain

a generalized Polya-Eggenberger model with Polya-Eggenberger and inverse Polya-Eggenberger

distributions as its particular cases. Sen and Ritu (1996) introduced three generalized Markov-

694

Polya urn models with predetermined strategies by the unified sampling scheme. Most recently,

Hassan and Bilal (2006) introduced a generalized Negative Polya-Eggenberger distribution

through a mixture model which has Polya-Eggenberger distribution as its particular case.

In this paper, a new generalization of the Polya- Eggenberger distribution has been proposed

involving hypergeometric function which is more versatile as compared to other generalizations

present in the literature. This fact has been illustrated with the help of three data sets presented in

section 4 of this paper. In section 2, we derived the proposed model and section 3 deals with

some interesting structural properties of the proposed model. Finally, in section 4, a computer

programme in R-Software has been used to ease the computations for estimating the parameters

of the proposed model for data fitting and it has been shown that the proposed model gives a

remarkably best fit as compared to other generalizations present in the literature

**2. THE PROPOSED MODEL
**

When a sample of fixed size n is taken from an infinite population where each element in the

population has an equal and independent probability p of possessing a specified attribute or the

sample is taken from a finite population where each element in the population has an equal and

independent probability pof having a specified attribute and elements are sampled independently

and sequentially with replacement then these situations can be represented by a random variable

X(possessing the attribute) that follows Binomial distribution with parameters

)

,

( p

n

and pmf

given by

n

x

p

p

p

p

x

P

x

n

x

n

x

,.....,

2,

1,

0

,

1

0

,

)

1(

)

;

(

(2.1)

In real life situations, the assumption that the probability pof each element (possessing the

attribute) is constant from trial to trial does not seem to be realistic. This assumption holds good

in case of chance mechanism only. In fact, every living being use their past experience (success

or failure) and wisdom for determining their future strategies to achieve their goals and so the

probability pof a success does not remain constant and thus may be considered as a random

variable taking values between 0 and 1 ,

1

0

p

. The natural distribution of p is Beta

distribution.

Beta distributions are very versatile and a variety of uncertainties can be usefully modeled by

them. Many generalizations of Beta distribution involving algebraic and exponential functions

have been proposed in the literature; see chapter 25 in Johnson et. al. (1995) and Gupta and

Nadarajah (2004) for detailed accounts. In (2003), Nadarajah, S. and Kotz, S. introduced a new

generalization of Beta distribution of II-kind in terms of hypergeometric function with

parameters

)

,

,

(

b

a

and p.d.f. given by

]

;

;

,

1[

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

(

1

2

1

p

b

a

a

F

p

b

a

b

a

b

p

P

b

a

(2.2)

for

1

0

p

,

0

,

0

b

a

and

0

and

)

,

( b

a

is a Beta function where as

]

;

;

,

1[1

2

p

b

a

a

F

is a

hypergeometric function which is defined by

!

]

;

;

,

[

0

]

[

]

[

]

[

1

2

j

x

c

b

a

x

c

b

a

F

j

j

j

j

j

695

where ]

[ j

a stands for ascending factorials of ‘a’ given by

)

1

)....(

1

(

]

[

j

a

a

a

a j

. Assuming the

distribution of a random variable pas (2.2), the distribution of a random variable X is obtained by

compounding the Binomial model (2.1) through the values of p with the generalized Beta

distribution of II-kind (2.2), we obtain

dp

p

b

a

a

F

p

p

b

a

b

a

b

x

X

P

x

n

b

a

x

n

x

]

;

;

,

1[

)

1(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

(

1

2

1

0

1

This on simplification gives

!

1

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

1(

)!

(

)!

1

(

)!

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

(

]

[

]

[

]

[

]

[

]

[

0

j

n

b

a

b

a

b

a

x

a

n

b

a

b

a

x

x

n

b

a

b

a

b

x

X

P

j

j

j

j

j

j

j

n

x

.

The last sum is a generalized hypergeometric function, the equation above can be written as

]1;

1

,

;

,

,

1[

)

(

)

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

!

!

)

(

2

3

]1

[

]

[

n

b

a

b

a

x

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

x

n

x

X

P

n

x

(2.3)

This can be put into an alternative form as

]

1;

1

,

;

,

,

1[

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

!

!

)

(

2

3

]1

[

]1

[

]

[

]

[

n

b

a

b

a

x

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

b

a

b

a

x

n

x

X

P

n

x

(2.4)

for

n

x

,....,

1,

0

,

0

)

,

,

,

(

b

a

n

and

]

1;

1

,

;

,

,

1[2

3

n

b

a

b

a

x

b

a

a

F

is a generalized hypergeo-

metric function which is absolutely convergent if

0

)

Re(

x

n

b

, see chapter 5, page 74,

Special functions by Earl D. Rainville (1971) for details. The expressions (2.3) and (2.4)

represent a new generalization of the Polya-Eggenberger distribution with parameters

)

,

,

,

(

b

a

n

.

**Remarks**: For

1

b

a

or

1

or0

a

or0

b

, the proposed distribution (2.4) reduces to

Polya-Eggenberger distribution with parameters in different forms.

**3. STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES
**

In this section, some of the interesting properties of the proposed model have been explored in

order to understand its nature to some extent. These are described below.

**3.1 Mean and Variance
3.1.1 Mean
**

By the conditional mean, we have

)

(X

E

Mean

)

( p

X

E

E

(3.1)

696

where

)

( p

X

E

is a conditional expectation of Xgiven pand for given p the random variable Xhas

a binomial distribution (2.1) with mean and variance given by

)

1(

)

(

)

(

p

np

p

X

V

np

p

X

E

(3.2)

Using (3.2) in (3.1), we get

]

[

)

(

p

E

n

X

E

.Since pis varying as the generalized beta

distribution of II-kind (2.2) with mth

moment about origin given by

]

1,

1

,

;

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

(

)

,

(

)

(

2

3

m

b

a

b

a

m

b

a

a

F

b

a

m

b

a

b

a

b

p

E m

(3.3)

Taking 1

m

in the equation above, we get the mean of the proposed model as

]

1,

2

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

)

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

X

E

.

**3.1.2 Variance
**

Similarly, variance of the proposed model can be obtained by the conditional variance

)

(

)

(

)

(

p

X

E

V

p

X

V

E

X

V

(3.4)

The equation (3.4) together with (3.2) gives

]

[

)]

1(

[

)

(

np

V

p

np

E

X

V

2

2

2

)}

(

{

]

[

)

1

(

]

[

p

E

n

p

E

n

n

p

nE

.

Using (3.3) for

2,1

m

in the equation above, we get

]

1,

1

1

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

)

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

X

V

]

1,

3

,

;

2

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

2

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

2

2

3

]

1,

1

1

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

.

697

**3.2 Moment Generating Function
**

The derivation of the moment generating function (mgf) of the proposed model is not

straightforward as it involves generalized hypergeometric function

]

1,

1

,

;

,

,

1[

2

3

n

b

a

b

a

x

b

a

a

F

which is an infinite series not easy to be summed. Since the proposed model is obtained by

compounding binomial model (2.1) with mgf

)

(t

M P

X

n

t

e

p

)]

1

(

1[

through the values of p

with the generalized beta distribution of II-kind (2.2), therefore, a theorem by Feller (1943)

yields the mgf of the proposed model as

dp

p

b

a

a

F

p

e

p

b

a

b

a

b

t

M

b

a

n

t

X

]

,

;

,

1[

))

1

(

1(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

(

1

0

1

2

1

dp

p

b

a

a

F

p

e

b

a

b

a

b

k

b

a

k

t

n

k

n

k

]

,

;

,

1[

)

1

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1

0

1

2

1

0

By an application of beta integrals, the equation above yields the moment generating function of

the proposed model as

]

1,

1

,

;

,

,

1[

)

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

(

2

3

0

k

b

a

b

a

k

b

a

a

F

k

b

a

e

b

a

b

a

b

t

M

k

t

n

k

n

k

X

**3.3 Moments for the Proposed Model
**

In this section, we obtained the rth moment about origin of the proposed model in terms of

Stirling numbers of second kind and generalized hypergeometric function. By conditional mean,

we have

)]

(

[

)

(

p

X

E

E

X

E

r

r

r

(3.5)

where

)

( p

X

E r

is conditional rth moment about origin of Xgiven pand for given pthe random

variable Xhas binomial distribution (2.1) with rth moment about origin given by

r

j

r

r

j

n

p

n

j

r

s

p

X

E

0

)!

(

!

)

,

(

)

(

(3.6)

where

!

!

0

)

,

(

j

x

j

j

r

s

r

j

r

j

at 0

x

is the Stirling numbers of second kind.

Substituting (3.6) in (3.5), we get

)

(

)!

(

!

)

,

(

0

r

r

j

r

p

E

j

n

n

j

r

s

698

Using (3.3) in the equation above, we get

)

,

(

)

(

)

,

(

)!

(

!

)

,

(

0

b

a

r

b

a

b

a

b

j

n

n

j

r

s

r

j

r

]

1,

1

,

;

,

,

1[

2

3

r

b

a

b

a

r

b

a

a

F

(3.7)

Taking

4,

3,

2,

1

r

in (3.7), we get the first four moments about origin of the proposed model as

]

1,

2

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

2

3

1

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

]

1,

2

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

2

3

2

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

]

1,

3

,

;

2

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

2

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

]

1,

1

1

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

2

3

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

]

1,

4

,

;

3

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

3

(

)

,

(

)

2

)(

1

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

n

]

1,

3

,

;

2

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

2

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

3

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

]

1,

1

1

,

;1

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

1

(

)

,

(

2

3

4

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

nb

]

1,

5

,

;

4

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

4

(

)

,

(

)

3

)(

2

)(

1

(

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

n

n

]

1,

4

,

;

3

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

3

(

)

,

(

)

2

)(

1

(

6

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

n

]

1,

3

,

;

2

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

2

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

7

2

3

b

a

b

a

b

a

a

F

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

n

n

**3.4 Factorial Moments
**

Following the similar arguments of the previous section, the rth factorial moment of the

proposed model can be obtained as

)

()

(

)

(

r

r

X

E

)]

(

[

)

(

p

X

E

E r

(3.8)

where

r

r

r

p

n

p

X

E

)

(

)

(

)

(

and

)

1

).....(

1

(

)

(

r

n

n

n

n r

. Substituting this value in (3.8), we get

)

(

)

(

)

(

r

r

r

p

E

n

A use of (3.3) in the equation above gives the rth factorial moment of the

proposed model as

]

1,

1

,

;

,

,

1[

)

,

(

)

(

)

,

(

2

3

)

(

)

(

r

b

a

b

a

r

b

a

a

F

b

a

r

b

a

b

a

b

n r

r

699

**TABLE 4.1 **Results of 10 shots fired from a rifle at each of 100 targets; Sveshnikcv, A. A. Ed.

(1968), PP 312-313.

No. of

Accidents

Obs.

Freq.

Expected frequencies

PED

GPED

(SM 1996)

GNPED

(HB 2006)

Proposed

Model

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0

2

4

10

22

26

18

12

4

2

0

0.15

1.29

5.04

12.16

20.03

23.49

19.85

11.89

4.81

1.16

0.13

0.14

1.22

4.87

11.91

19.87

23.58

20.12

12.13

4.87

1.13

0.16

0.14

1.22

4.86

11.91

19.89

23.61

20.13

12.11

4.86

1.14

0.13

0.14

1.22

4.86

11.92

19.91

23.63

20.13

12.09

4.85

1.14

0.11

Total

100

100

100

100

ML

Estimate

χ2

(d.f)

n10

a43.045327

b41.890767

1.056273

(4)

n10

-0.93094

a50.30695

b42.20174

1.020418

(3)

n9.244629

0.037662

47.262270

41.913235

1.008995

(2)

n10

a43.768887

b0.000211

41.319327

1.001827

(3)

**TABLE 4.2 **(Source: Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967): Statistical methods, sixth

edition, The Iowa University Press, Iowa, U.S.A., PP.237)

No. of

Accidents

Obs.

Freq.

Expected frequencies

PED

GPED

(SM 1996)

GNPED

(HB 2006)

Proposed

Model

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

36

48

38

23

10

3

1

1

35.05

48.66

38.19

21.97

10.21

4.01

1.36

0.55

35.59

48.99

38.07

21.69

9.97

3.87

1.30

0.52

35.60

48.98

38.07

21.70

9.98

3.87

1.30

0.50

35.88

48.56

37.92

21.86

10.13

3.92

1.28

0.45

Total

160

160

160

160

160

ML

Estimate

χ2

d.f.

n7

a5.513321

b53.295234

0.230829(3)

n7

-0.79706

a5.723447

b36.39953

0.1877409

(2)

n12.024178

0.1830634

5.6509704

37.1968856

0.1813224

(1)

n7

a4.471435

b0.001004

29.854893

0.1429262

(2)

SM: Sen and Mishra

HB: Hassan and Bilal

700

**4. GOODNESS OF FIT
**

In this section, we present three data sets available in the literature to examine the fitting of the

proposed model and comparing it with the fitting of Polya-Eggenberger distribution (PED), the

generalized Polya-Eggenberger distribution (GPED) defined by Sen and Mishra (1996) and the

generalized negative Polya-Eggenberger distribution (GNPED) defined by Hassan and Bilal

(2006). Due to complicated likelihood function, the maximum likelihood estimate of the

parameters of the proposed model is not straightforward and need some iterative procedure such

as Fisher’s scoring method, Newton-Rapson method etc. for their solution. R-software provides

one among such solutions. Therefore, a computer programme in R-software is used to estimate

the parameters of the distribution. The ML estimates of the parameters so obtained are shown at

their respective places in the table. It may be mentioned here that the parameter n in case of

PED**, **GPED defined by Sen and Mishra (1996) and Proposed model are known where as in case

of GNPED, defined by Hassan and Bilal (2006), the value of n is estimated. It is clear from all

the tables above that the proposed model gives a satisfactory fit and provides a better alternative

than the compared distributions.

**REFERENCES
**

Earl, D. Rainville (1971). Special Functions (Re-print). Chelsa Publishing Company, Bronx,

New York.

Eggenberger, F. and Polya, G. (1923). Uber die Statistik verketteter vorgange, Z.Angew. Math.

Mech.1, 279-289.Newbold, E. (1927). Practical applications of the statistics of repeated

events, particularly to industrial accidents. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 90, 487-547.

Gupta, A.K. and Nadarajah, S. (2004).Handbook of Beta Distribution and its Applications. New

York: Marcel Dekker.

Hassan, A. and Bilal, S. (2006). A generalized negative Polya-Eggenberger distribution and its

applications. International Journal of Modern Mathematics, volume 1, number 1, Oct. 2006,

97-113.

Janardan, K. G. (1973). A new four urn model with predetermined strategy. Technical Report

37-I, Sangamon State University, Springfield II.

Janardan, K. G. (1975). Markov-Polya urn models with predetermined strategies-I, Gujarat

Statist. Rev. 2(1), 17-32.

Janardan, K. G. and Schaeffer, D. J. (1977). A generalization of the Markov-Polya distribution.

Its extensions and applications. Biom. Zeit 19, 87-106.

Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions,

volume 2 (second edition).New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Saralees Nadarajah and Samuel Kotz (2003). A generalized Beta distribution Π. Inter- Stat. Dec.

2003, 1-7.

Sen, K. and Mishra, A. (1996). A generalized Polya-Eggenberger model generating various

discrete probability distributions. Sankhya.

Sen, K. and Ritu, J. (1996). Generalized Markov-Polya urn models with predetermined

strategies. Journal of Statistical planning and Inference 54, 119-133.

701

Proceedings of the Tenth Islamic Countries Conference on Statistical Sciences (ICCS-X), Volume II,

The Islamic Countries Society of Statistical Sciences, Lahore: Pakistan, (2010): 701–707.

On Comparison of Some Variation of Ranked Set Sampling

On Comparison of Some Variation of Ranked Set Sampling

18 Kamarulzaman

18 Kamarulzaman

Empirical Characteristic Function Approach to Goodness of Fit Tests

GOODNESS OF FIT TEST FOR LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION INVOLVING KULLBACK-LEIBLER INFORMATION

Institut Statistik Malaysia - UM-KL

Volume 1-Conference ICCS-X

Proc.CIAM2010[1]

Logistic Parameters Estimation

Conference-Malaysia- Icms2 Parallel Sessions[1]

Sameer Al-Subh C.V

Modified EDF Goodness of Fit Tests for Logistic Distribution Under SRS and ERSS

EDF GOODNESS OF FIT TESTS OF LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION UNDER SELECTIVE ORDER STATISTICS

- Read and print without ads
- Download to keep your version
- Edit, email or read offline

Volume 1-Conference ICCS-X

Conference-Malaysia- Icms2 Parallel Sessions[1]

Institut Statistik Malaysia - UM-KL

Proc.CIAM2010[1]

ELDER_ABUSE_IN_MALAYSIA

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

CANCEL

OK

You've been reading!

NO, THANKS

OK

scribd

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->