Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Now, coming from Rand, there are people who will automatically discount this idea
of equating "freedom" with "capitalism," especially those who don't see the
connection Rand or not. But, the initiation of force, as opposed to its use in
self-defence, can never be justified, and thus is never moral. Man lives by reason
alone, or he has no justification for anything, objectively speaking.
Then, too, there are those who claim that morals are relative, whatever that
means. Actually, it means whatever its proponent wants it to mean; whereas
objective morals are based in the nature of Man as the "rational animal," with the
objective standards for his existence being those of "qua Man."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/qua
"[Adam] Smith's great revelation was that political freedom would most likely
emerge and persist under conditions of economic freedom, what we now call
capitalism. Our democratic system as defined in our Constitution incorporated
respect for this economic system.
"And here is the good news. Virtually every country, whatever its political
system, wants to embrace it. They have seen the success of the American economy.
"It has been said that when goods cross borders, armies don't. Today, China and
India are the world's two largest countries racing toward entrepreneurial
capitalism. They are the example and test of that thesis. Several decades ago,
their armies clashed. Now no one talks of war, only of their economic emergence.
Capitalism has promoted peace and, in China, better — though still inadequate —
respect for rights." Carl J. Schramm; USA Today
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-06-27-capitalism_x.htm
Anything less than capitalism, whereby economic goals are neither restricted nor
determined by the coercive forces of government, is not an economy of freedom.
mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com
http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/