Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

10K views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Retaining Wall Design Example
- CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL
- Design a RCC Retaining Wall to Retain Earth Up To
- DESIGN OF RETAINING WALL
- Cantilever Retaining Wall Design
- Cantilever Retaining Wall Design
- Retaining Wall Design Manual
- Retaining Wall Excel Sheet
- Retaining Walls
- retaining wall
- Retaining Wall Design Example
- Retaining Counterfort Wall Design
- Counterfort Retaining Wall B.C. Punamia 05-Feb-2012
- Retaining Walls
- retaining wall
- 51294800-RCC-retaining-wall-BS8110.xls
- Cantilever Retaining Wall
- Retaining Wall Design
- Retaining Walls
- Chapter 5 Retaining Walls

You are on page 1of 18

Introduction

1. Overturning.

2. Sliding.

3. Bearing capacity.

4. Bending or shear failure of stem.

5. Bending or shear failure of heel.

6. Bending or shear failure of toe.

7. Bending or shear failure of key.

All items above should be considered in designing a retaining wall.

There is also a rotational stability failure that is not normally checked except when a retaining wall is located

on a slope.

Stability analysis

1. Check factor of safety against overturning.

2. Check soil bearing pressure.

3. Check factor of safety against sliding.

1. Check thickness of stem for shear stress.

2. Design stem reinforcement for bending.

3. Check thickness of heel for shear stress.

4. Design heel reinforcement.

5. Check shear stress for toe when the toe is long.

6. Design toe reinforcement for bending.

7. Check shear stress in key when key is deep and narrow.

8. Design key reinforcement for bending.

Stability analysis of retaining wall

Check soil bearing pressure.

Check factor of safety against sliding.

Example 5.1 Cantilever retaining wall with horizontal backfill, no surcharge

Example 5.2 Cantilever retaining wall with horizontal backfill, surcharge, and key

Example 5.3 Cantilever retaining wall with slope backfill

(Free excel file for wall stabilty, e-mail webmaster@ce-ref.com )

Important Notes:

1. Lateral earth pressure is normally calculated based on Rankine or Coulomb’s theories. Lateral earth

pressure is assumed distributed triangularly. The location of resultant is at 1/3 of height. If there is

surcharge, lateral earth pressure from surcharge is distributed uniformly. The resultant is at ½ of

height. The lateral earth pressure is calculated at the edge of heel.

2. The rotating point for overturning is normally assumed at bottom of toe. The height of soil used to

calculate lateral earth pressure should be from top of earth to the bottom of footing.

3. Elements that resisting overturning are weight of stem, weight of footing, weight of soil above footing.

If there is a surcharge, the weight of surcharge can also be considered.

4. The factor of safety against overturning is resisting moment divided by overturning moment.

Acceptable factor of safety is between 1.5 to 2.

5. The driving force that causes retaining wall to slide is the lateral earth pressure from soil and

surcharge. The forces that resist sliding are passive pressure at toe, the friction at the base of the

footing; and the passive pressure against the key if used.

6. The factor of safety against sliding is the total resisting force divided by total driving force.

Acceptable factor of safety is between 1.5 to 2.

Overturning:

1. The overturning moment is calculated as

Where is unit weight of soil, Ka is active pressure coefficient, and H is the height from top of earth

where Ws,Wf,We,Wk,Wq are weight of stem, footing, earth, key and surcharge, Xs,Xf,Xe,Xk,Xq are

distance from the center of stem, footing, earth, key, and surcharge to the rotation point at toe.

Bearing pressure:

Where W is total weight of retaining wall including stem, footing, earth and surcharge.

3. If e B/6, the maximum and minimum footing pressure is calculated as

Where, Qmax, Qmin are maximum and minimum footing pressure, B is the width of footing.

4. If e > B/6, Qmin is zero,

5. Qmax should be less than allowable soil bearing capacity of footing soil.

Sliding:

where is friction coefficient between concrete and soil. is often taken as tan (2/3 ). is internal

friction of the soil.

3. The passive resistance at the toe of retaining wall is calculated as

Where Kp is passive earth pressure coefficient, h is the height from top of soil to bottom of footing at

toe. If a key is used to help resist sliding, h is the height from top of soil to the bottom of the key.

Given:

Height of stem: 10 ft

Thickness of stem: 1 ft

Thickness of footing: 1 ft

Width of footing: B = 6 ft

Length of heel: 4 ft

Length of toe: 1 ft

Height of soil above heel: 10 ft

Height of soil above toe: 1 ft

Unit weight of backfill soil: = 115 pcf,

Friction coefficient between concrete and soil: 0.5

Allowable soil bearing capacity for footing soil: 3000 psf

Requirement: Check stability against overturning and sliding, and soil bearing capacity.

1. Check overturning stability

Consider one-foot width of soil

3

Overturning moment: Mo= Ka H /6 = 8504 ft-lb

Weight of stem: Ws=150x10x1=1500 lbs

Distance from center of earth to edge of toe: Xe=4 ft

Total weight of retaining wall: W=1500+900+4600 = 7000 lbs

Distance from center of resultant to toe,

X = (MR-Mo)/W = (23350-8504)/7000 = 2.12 ft

Eccentricity: e = 6/2 – 2.12= 0.88 ft < 1/6 width of footing, 1 ft

Maximum and minimum footing pressure:

2

Driving force: Ph = = Ka H /2 = 2319 lbs

2

Passive resistance at toe: Pp = = Kp H /2 = 115x3x22 =690 lbs

FS= (Fr+Pp)/Ph = (3500+690)/2319 = 1.81 >1.5 O.K.

Example 5.2 Cantilever retaining wall with horizontal backfill, surcharge, and key

Given:

Height of stem: 10 ft

Thickness of stem: 1 ft

Thickness of footing: 1 ft

Width of footing: B = 6 ft

Length of heel: 4 ft

Length of toe: 1 ft

Height of soil above heel: 10 ft

Height of soil above toe: 1 ft

Depth of key: 1 ft

Unit weight of backfill soil: =115 pcf

Internal friction angle of soil: = 28 degree

Friction coefficient between concrete and soil: = 0.5

Allowable soil bearing capacity for footing soil: 4000 psf

Surcharge above backfill soil: q = 200 psf

Requirement: Check stability against overturning and sliding, and check soil bearing capacity.

1. Check overturning stability

Consider one foot width of soil:

3

Overturning moment: Mo= Ka H /6 = 13580 ft-lb

Weight of stem: Ws=150x10x1=1500 lbs

Distance from center of surcharge to edge of toe: Xq = 4 ft

Total weight of retaining wall: W=1500+900+4600+150+800 = 7950 lbs

Distance from center of resultant to toe: X = (26850-13580)/7950=1.67 ft

Eccentricity: e = 6/2-1.67 = 1.33 ft > 1/6 width of footing, 1 ft

Maximum footing pressure:

2

Driving force: Ph = = Ka H /2 + q Ka H= 115x0.333x112+ 200x0.333x11 = 3306 lbs

2

Passive resistance at toe: Pp = = Kp H /2 = 115x2.77x32 =1433 lbs

FS= (Fr+Pp)/Ph = (3975+1433)/3306 = 1.64 >1.5 O.K.

Example 5.3 Cantilever retaining wall with slope backfill

Given:

Height of stem: 10 ft

Thickness of stem: 1 ft

Thickness of footing: 1 ft

Width of footing: B = 6 ft

Length of heel: 4 ft

Length of toe: 1 ft

Height of soil above heel at retaining wall: 10 ft

Height of soil above toe: 1 ft

Unit weight of backfill soil: =115 pcf

Slope of backfill soil: = 10 degree

Internal friction angle of soil: = 30 degree

Friction coefficient between concrete and soil: = 0.5

Allowable soil bearing capacity for footing soil: 3000 psf

Requirement: Check stability against overturning and sliding, and check soil bearing capacity.

1. Check overturning stability

Rankine's active earth coefficient:

Height from top of backfill soil to bottom of footing: H = 10+1+4 tan = 11.71 ft

Consider one foot width of wall,

3

Overturning moment: Mo= Ka H /6 = 115x0.35*11.713/6 = 10740 ft-lb

Weight of stem: Ws=150x10x1=1500 lbs

Divide the earth above heel to two portions: a rectangular portion and a triangular portion

Weight of rectangular portion of earth: We1=115x10x4=4600 lbs

Total weight of retaining wall: W=1500+900+4600+162 = 7162 lbs

Distance from center of resultant to toe: X = (24110-10740)/7162=1.87 ft

Eccentricity: e = 6/2-1.13 = 1.13 ft > 1/6 width of footing, 1 ft

Maximum footing pressure:

2

Driving force: Ph = = Ka H /2 = 115x0.35x1.732/2 =2754 lbs

Rankine's passive earth coefficient:

2

Passive resistance at toe: Pp = = Kp H /2 = 115x2.78x22 =638 lbs

FS= (Fr+Pp)/Ph = (3581+638)/2754 = 1.53 >1.5 O.K.

Reinforced concrete design of retaining wall

Contents

• Design forces and critical sections

• Design of stem

• Design horizontal reinforcement for shrinkage and expansion

• Design of heel

• Design of toe

Design of stem

Design thickness of stem

2

Vu = 1.7*(γ Ka H /2+q Ka H) [6.1]

Where 1.7 is load factor, γ is unit weight of soil, Ka is active lateral earth coefficient, h is height of earth, q

is surcharge.

φVc=0.85*(2√fc’) b d [6.2]

Where 0.85 is strength reduction factor, fc’ is compressive strength of concrete, b is one foot width of

wall, d is effective depth of stem and is equal to thickness of stem minus 2” cover and half bar size.

3. Compare shear force with shear strength, design shear reinforcement when necessary.

If φVc≥ Vu no shear reinforcement is required

3 2

Mu=1.7*(γ Ka H /6+q Ka H /2) [6.3]

2. Design flexural reinforcement for stem

Reinforcement ratio:

[6.4]

Where

2

R=Mu/(0.9bd ), m =Fy/(0.85fc’), Fy is yield strength of steel.

The required minimum reinforcement is the smaller of

The minimum total vertical reinforcement ratio for wall (both faces) is

0.0012 for deformed bars #5 or smaller or 0.0015 for other bars (ACI 14.3.2)

When retaining wall gets too long, the wall will crack due to shrinkage of concrete. Vertical control joints

and horizontal reinforcement are normally used to control cracks in the stems. The spacing of control

joist depends on the amount of horizontal reinforcement. Larger spacing requires heavier reinforcement.

The reinforcement ratio recommended by Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI) is shown below.

(Reproduced from CRSI handbook)

The minimum total horizontal reinforcement ratio for wall (both faces) is

0.002 for deformed bars #5 or smaller or 0.0025 for others.

In some case, when temperature change is large and the retaining wall has to be water tied, expansion

joist are used. The width of expansion joint depends on temperature change and the length between

joints. Without consider the contribution of horizontal reinforcement, the width of expansion joints can be

calculated as

D=1.5*(0.0000065*T*L) [6.6]

temperature difference, L is the length of wall between expansion joints, 1.5 is factor of safety.

Design of heel

Forces that apply to the heel are weight of soil, footing, surcharge, and footing bearing pressure. Weight

of soil, footing, and surcharge are downward forces. Footing bearing pressure is upward forces.

Sometime, footing bearing pressure are neglected to be conservative. Otherwise, factored footing

pressures are calculated as follows:

Calculated factored footing pressure

[6.7]

Where W is total weight of retaining wall including stem, footing, earth and surcharge.

2. The eccentricity, eu = B/2-Xu

[6.8]

[6.9]

Where, Qmax, Qmin are maximum and minimum factored footing pressure, B is the width of footing.

Q = Qmin + (Qmax-Qmin)*(B-L)/B

Where B is the width of footing, L is the distance from toe

[6.10]

Lb = 3*Xu

Q = Qmax*(Lb-L)/Lb [6.11]

The critical section of shear in the heel is taken at the face of stem instead of at one-effective depth from

the stem because it does not produce compression to the stem according to ACI code.

1. Calculated factored shear force at face of stem

Vu = 1.4*(We +Whl+Wq)-R [6.12]

Where 1.4 is load factor, We is weight of earth, Whl is weight of heel, Wq is weight of surcharge, and R is

resultant of factored bearing pressure.

2. Calculated shear strength of stem.

φVc=0.85*(2√fc’) b d [6.13]

Where 0.85 is strength reduction factor, fc’ is compressive strength of concrete, b is one foot width of

wall, d is effective depth of stem and is equal to thickness of stem minus 2” cover and half bar size.

3. Compare shear force with shear strength, if φVc< Vu, increase thickness of stem.

The critical section of moment is at the face of stem. The heel reinforcement is calculated as follows:

1. Calculate factored moment at face of toe

Mu=1.4*(We+Whl+Wq)*C/2-R*Xr [6.14]

Reinforcement ratio:

Where

2

R=Mu/(0.9bd ), m =Fy/(0.85fc’), Fy is yield strength of steel.

The required minimum reinforcement is the smaller of

Reinforcement ratio: 0.002 for grade 40, 50 deformed bars, 0.0018 for grade 60 deformed bars.

Design of toe

The forces that apply to the bottom of toe is footing bearing pressure. In a normal situation, the length of

toe is shorter than that of heel. The maximum shear force is less than of heel. The depth of footing for

heel is usually enough for toe. It is also a normal practice to bend the dowel bars at the bottom of stem

for toe reinforcement. It is normally sufficient for toe reinforcement. In some situation, when toe is extra

long, then, it will be necessary to check shear strength and design reinforcement for toe.

If eu ≤ B/6, the factored footing pressure at one-effective depth from face of stem is

If eu > B/6, the factored footing pressure at one-effective depth from face of stem is

Q = Qmax*(Lb-Lc)/Lb [6.16]

Where Lc is the distance from edge of toe to one effective depth from front face of stem.

The factored shear force at the critical section is

Vu = (Q + Qmax)*Lc/2-Wc [6.17]

2. Calculate shear strength of toe

The shear strength of the concrete is

φVc=0.85*(2√fc’) b d

If eu ≤ B/6, the factored footing pressure at one-effective depth from face of stem is

Q = Qmin + (Qmax-Qmin)*(B-Ld)/B

If eu > B/6, the factored footing pressure at one-effective depth from face of stem is

Q = Qmax*(Lb-Ld)/Lb

Mu=R*Xr-Wt*Ld/2 [6.18]

Where Xr is the distance from the resultant force to the front face of stem, Wt is weight of concrete and

soil above toe.

reinforcement ratio:

Where

2

R=Mu/(0.9bd ), m =Fy/(0.85fc’), Fy is yield strength of steel.

The required minimum reinforcement is the smaller of

source: www.CE-Ref.com 18 www.budhicivileng.blogspot.com

- Retaining Wall Design ExampleUploaded byTuan Metuan
- CANTILEVER RETAINING WALLUploaded byelsayedamr
- Design a RCC Retaining Wall to Retain Earth Up ToUploaded byMuhammad Farooq Zia
- DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLUploaded byHarsh Thakur
- Cantilever Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byAsela Udayanga
- Cantilever Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byAgha Sikander
- Retaining Wall Design ManualUploaded byjakes47
- Retaining Wall Excel SheetUploaded byfordesign
- Retaining WallsUploaded byBheemesh Chowdary Kacharagadla(Raghu)
- retaining wallUploaded byjoni_joan
- Retaining Wall Design ExampleUploaded byJefferson Nobleza
- Retaining Counterfort Wall DesignUploaded byGoutam Chakraborty
- Counterfort Retaining Wall B.C. Punamia 05-Feb-2012Uploaded byLokesh Sharma
- Retaining WallsUploaded byCarmel Buniel Sabado
- retaining wallUploaded byKonataVon
- 51294800-RCC-retaining-wall-BS8110.xlsUploaded bymttaib
- Cantilever Retaining WallUploaded byOdu Erikole
- Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byNiraj Prasad
- Retaining WallsUploaded byFatih Oral
- Chapter 5 Retaining WallsUploaded bypaarth93
- ACI 318 08 Design of Retaining Wall With Counterfort Rev1Uploaded byKING ENG
- Guide to Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byKavin Tam
- Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byAllan Waga
- 101109 Retaining Wall CalculationUploaded byAlexPak
- 17-Retaining Wall DesignUploaded byPuti Mayesti
- RC_cantilever retaining wall_final.xlsUploaded bymegget
- Cantilever Reinforced Concrete Wall Design (Ch9)Uploaded bytrottersit
- Retaining WallUploaded byjeemonvg
- RCC-Design-Sheets.xlsUploaded byashuswara

- AcknowledgementUploaded byToniMelo
- Staad Examples2Uploaded byAnonymous nwByj9L
- Diy Deckpatio08Uploaded byBcd Cde
- ComFlor Manual.pdfUploaded bySofija Kekez
- Early_Age Shrinkage of ConcreteUploaded byTim Lin
- Waffle SlabUploaded byReymond Longtable
- Coiled-tubing Desing and OptimizationUploaded byRFV
- Driven Pile Capacity in Clay and Drilled Shaft Capacity in Rock From Field Load TestsUploaded byMUHAMMAD ALI
- 1 Formwork System and MethodsUploaded byMohamedRaahim
- Characteristic Analysis of Supersonic Impinging Jet in Laser MachiningUploaded byFrancesco Buzzigoli
- Eurocode 8 Part 2 PDFUploaded byFreddy
- eee (1)Uploaded byFatimah Nik Mazlan
- example_7.3Uploaded byAzzumar Utami
- Brochure Alsina Philippines 2Uploaded byBill Ginivan
- Seismic Design of Bridges - Equivalent Cantilever MethodUploaded byJosue Lewandowski
- 3)Bearing CapacityUploaded byhaftamuTekle
- Arc Frp Pipes & FittingsUploaded bykasvikraj
- 10788_1Uploaded byShishir_Kadam_2138
- PAG-LFS-CIV-SPC-005 Civil Specification Pile and Sheet Piles- R0Uploaded byzikmon
- PILE 01Uploaded byসামিউল হাসান শান্ত
- J. Riley Edwards and Matthew CsendeUploaded byAndita Tri Budianto
- XLOTUploaded byDiya Disha
- 09 Paper-67Uploaded byAerospaceAngel
- ManjariUploaded bySTRUCTURE -STRUCTURE
- An Architect's Approach to StructuresUploaded byAshish Jain
- santhiniUploaded byNitisha Rathore
- Mechanical Work Specification (Dec08).pdfUploaded byGnabBang
- Ultra Fibre Concrete Brochure 01 (1)Uploaded byVasilis Lappas
- aqua fer testUploaded byЭнх-Амгалан Баярсайхан
- PVDUploaded byJunieli Niel Mendrofa