P. 1
FAX Letter to Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner the U.S. Congressman from Ohio sent 11 Jun 2011

FAX Letter to Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner the U.S. Congressman from Ohio sent 11 Jun 2011

5.0

|Views: 26,598|Likes:
Published by cfkerchner
11 Jun 2011: FAX Letter to Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner the U.S. Congressman from Ohio sent 11 Jun 2011. Write to the Speaker, John Boehner, and tell him what you think too!

For more information on Obama's criminal activities see:
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

11 Jun 2011: FAX Letter to Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner the U.S. Congressman from Ohio sent 11 Jun 2011. Write to the Speaker, John Boehner, and tell him what you think too!

For more information on Obama's criminal activities see:
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

More info:

Categories:Types, Letters
Published by: cfkerchner on Jun 12, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/18/2015

pdf

text

original

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., P.E.

Commander USNR (Retired) Lehigh Valley PA [address & contact information redacted]

11 June 2011 via FAX to #202-225-0704 (Washington DC office) [also FAX’s to his OH offices] To: The Speaker of the House of the United States – John Boehner Re: Report of criminal activities including identity theft of a Social Security Number and placing a forged PDF file of an alleged long form birth certificate on to government property servers at the White House by Obama and his operatives. Dear Speaker Boehner: When will you publicly call for congressional investigations into the criminal activities of the putative president Obama? See the attached for more details into the citizen charges filed against Obama. No serious action has been taken or will be taken until our elected officials, such as you, and the United States Congress take action to call for investigations. When will you call for the U.S. House to investigate Obama’s true legal identity with subpoenaed witnesses under oath and original documents subjected to forensic analysis? As an elected official who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, it is your duty to call for investigations of criminal activity in any branch of the government, even at the highest levels. We must support the rule of law or our Constitutional Republic is lost. We are supposed to be a nation of laws not men. An investigation must be called for. No man is above the law, not even a president. We cannot allow an imposter and criminal to continue his usurpation of office unchecked and uninvestigated by the Congress. When will you publicly call for an investigation of Obama for the criminal matters detailed in the attachments, i.e., production of forged birth certificate documents on government property and use of a stolen or invalid social security number, and filing of a forged and back dated draft registration form on his behalf by his connections in the Chicago IL Selective Service office? I ask you to call for investigations of these matters in the U.S. House by the appropriate committee. When will you do so? Sincerely, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., P.E. Commander USNR (Retired) P.S. To find more information on the latest round of forgery by Obama, google on the term “Obama forged long form birth certificate” Attachments (3):

1. Copy of 30 May 2011 full page ad in the Washington Times National Weekly, page 5, reporting the criminal charges of document forgery and identity theft being made against Obama. 2. Copy of the 6 June 2011 news story at World Net Daily reporting that a citizen named Douglas Vogt who is a digital image and scanner expert with decades of experience has filed criminal charges that the recent Obama long form birth certificate document and PDF file placed on the White House servers on 27 April 2011 are forgeries. 3. Copy of the 8 June 2011 news story at World Net Daily reporting that a citizen named Paul Irey who is a typewriter typeface expert with 50 years experience has confirmed that the alleged typed Obama long form birth certificate document copies given to the reporters in the White House news conference on 27 April 2011 are copies of a forged document.

Attachment (1)

/ 5/

ADVERTISEMENT

Obama Long Form Birth Certificate PDF Forged! Draft Registration Forged & Back Dated to 1980! Obama is Using Someone Else’s CT SSN! Why Isn’t Congress and FBI Investigating?
Federal Lawsuit* Accuses Putative President Obama is Fraudulently Using a Social Security Number which is Legally Not His and which was Issued only to Residents of the State of Connecticut, a State where Obama Never Legally Resided and Certainly Not During the Time Frame that SSN was Issued!

ged For

042-XX-XXXX*
This Social Security number is reserved for the people of Connecticut NOT Hawaii. Obama never lived in Connecticut, and he certainly wasn’t living there when this number was issued in 1977, rather he was a 15 year old attending High School in Hawaii.

More interesting is 042-XX-XXXX has been reported as associated with another individual born in 1890. When you die, the number dies with you and should not still be being used in 2008.
President Obama has used 042-XX-XXXX since the 1980s when he “supposedly” applied for Selective Service, but Social Security Administration now says the number was never issued.
*For more information and details on the Social Security Number that Obama is accused of illegally using, see the civil lawsuit and Federal Court Docket Number 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Taitz v Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Use by Obama of a CT issued SSN confirmed by multiple investigators including two state licensed investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey. See the lawsuit for more details.

The President & Commander in Chief of the Military Must Be A “natural born Citizen” — U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President
The Law of Nations, Vattel, 1758. Used by Ben Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other founders. Vol.1, Ch.19, Section 212:

Per the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama when born in 1961 was a British Subject at birth.

“natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”

Obama’s Father was NOT a U.S. Citizen,
nor was he an Immigrant to the USA, nor was he even a Permanent Resident of the USA.

MONDAY, MAY 30, 2011 / THE WASHINGTON TIMES /

Obama, the Putative U.S. President, was Born a British Subject Governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948, and is Currently also a British Protected Person and/or a British Citizen to this Day.

How can a person who is born a British Subject be considered a Natural Born Citizen of the USA?
Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards!
Help Protect Our Liberty.
I’ve enclosed a check in the amount of: ❑ $1,000 ❑ $100 ❑ $500 ❑ $50 ❑ $250 ❑ Other $________

A Catalog of Evidence: Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama was Born in Hawaii Read why here : http://www.scribd.com/doc/32486123/
WEB/BLOG: http://www.protectourliberty.org • http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Please send check payable to Diener Consultants, Inc.: Diener Consultants, Inc. ATTN: ProtectOurLiberty Fund 17388 Nature Walk Trail #301 Parker, CO 80134

Paid for by: American people donating funds at ProtectOurLiberty.org to support awareness of Obama’s constitutional eligibility issues.

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=306953

Attachment (2)

Monday, June 06, 2011
WND Exclusive

Document-imaging expert outlines his case in 22-page filing with FBI
Posted: June 05, 2011 6:25 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
WND

This is the second of three articles explaining the criminal complaint that scanner-expert Doug Vogt filed last week with the FBI. The 22-page criminal complaint filed with the FBI by document-imaging expert Doug Vogt charges that individuals within the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives and an unidentified graphic artist worked in a multi-state conspiracy to create a fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama. Vogt's complaint asserts: "I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 President Obama is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs." Get the inside details on what could be the most serious constitutional crisis in modern history, in "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by author Jerome Corsi! He claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original authentic information. (Story continues below) As WND has previously reported, Obama's birth certificate number appears to be out of sequence with the birth certificate numbers given to twins born a day after Obama. Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar on Aug. 11, 1961. Gretchen Nordyke was born at 2:17 p.m. and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961. Barack Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961. "It is impossible to have Obama's certificate number to be four numbers higher than a certificate that came in three days later," Vogt concludes. Vogt's forensic examination of the birth certificate number on the White House-released long form concluded that the last "1" in the number "10641," as seen in the figure below, is a grayscale image, while the remaining numbers are not. This is, he says, "irrefutable proof that the certificate number is a composite of two numbers and hence a forgery."

Vogt argues that a person or persons in the Hawaii DOH with access to the document-imaging program searched the database for someone close to the actual birth date of Obama and found someone born near Aug. 4, 1961. "Obama may have chosen the 4th of August because they had a baby who died close to his date of birth," he writes. "The clerk may have cross-referenced the death database to find someone who had died and had a birth date close to Obama's." Vogt speculated that someone may have taken the birth certificate number originally assigned an infant girl named Virginia Sunahara, born Aug. 4, 1961, at Wahiawa Hospital in Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii. As WND previously reported, Virginia Sunahara died Aug. 5, 1961, at Kapi'olani hospital, due to complications, the same day the Nordyke twins were born there Regarding Virginia Sunahara, Vogt made two assumptions: "The first would be that the Wahiawa Hospital would have filled the COLB (Certificate of Live Birth) form as customary and mailed it to the County Health Department and the Kapiolani Medical Center would have filled out the death certificate. The other less probable would be that her medical records were transferred to Kapiolani Hospital and they would produce the birth certificate and later the death certificate was later included in the group of birth certificates that contained the Nordyke twins." Vogt speculated that a forger took Virginia Sunahara's birth number as Obama's, knowing that she was long dead and not available to complain about identity theft. "We can conclude from this that more than one person was involved in the Hawaii Department of Health to assemble the different components that were used and also do the database searches to find the right certificates to create the fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth and finally someone who signed the fraudulent certificate," he writes. "I believe that after all the components were assembled they were then given to a graphic artist to actually assemble the whole thing and create the finished forgery. That graphic artist could be located anywhere. In short this was a multi-state conspiracy to defraud the United States." Date stamp irregularities In Boxes 20 and 22 on the Obama long-form birth certificate, the stamps recording the date the local registrar and registrar general accepted the birth certificate have two different colors on both lines where there should be no color at all. Also, the color differences are evident in Box 22, both in the printed text of the box and in the stamp recording the date that the local registrar accepted the birth certificate, Vogt says, as seen below:

"What I think this is showing us is that the person who put this fraud together was looking for a form that had the right date, namely "August 8 19_1," Vogt writes, commenting on Box 22. "As you can see the only things that are printed in dark green (R=71, G=92, B=73) are 'Date A' and 'AUG -8 6.' The rest of the type is in black." Vogt believes this was a clear indication "that the forger was working in color mode and what they copied from had a color value for some reason unless they put a color value on it." The color differences are also evident in Box 20, the date the local registrar accepted the birth certificate, as seen below:

"The 'AUG -8 196' is in dark green (R=87, G=111, B=87) and the '1' is in black," Vogt observes with regard to Box 20. "Yet again, another irrefutable proof this form is a forgery." Vogt additionally observes that the font size of the rubber stamp in Box 22 is larger than the stamp used in Box 20. "This is unlikely because the same rubber stamp would have been used, at the same time, by the same registrar to stamp the dates in both places and sign the form in Box 21," he notes. "Since we have two size letters and numbers, this means these elements were taken from two separate forms that may have been years apart using different rubber stamps." The official seal is not part of the Obama birth certificate Vogt references the embossed seal on the short-form Certification of Live Birth posted by FactCheck.org to determine that the Hawaii DOH was using an electric embosser that applies ample pressure to leave a clearly visible embossment. The embossed seal on the FactCheck.org short-form COLB appeared about three inches from the bottom of the 11-inch paper, but hand seal embossers have only 1 ¾ inch or less clearance for a 2 ¼ inch seal from the edge of the paper. The figure below shows the embossed seal on the Obama short-form COLB posted by FactCheck.org:

Vogt notes that even on the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, as seen below, the embossed seal was evident, even though the image was inverted to white-on-black from the original microfilm image:

The figure below shows that the embossed seal on the Obama birth certificate released by the White House is visible only because a color filter was used to see it, otherwise it disappears in the design of the security paper:

The figure below shows a close-up of the seal on the Obama long-form birth certificate under color filter:

The figure below shows that the embossed seal on the Obama long-form document disappears into the hash-marked background when the document is viewed normally, without color filters:

"The official seal on the Obama birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 is a second or even third generation image from another form," Vogt concludes. "The seal embossing did not distort the lines or type on the form and it most likely was never part of his certificate. Yet another indication this Certificate of Live Birth is an obvious forgery." Forged state registrar stamp? Vogt concludes the state registrar's stamp certifying the Obama April 27 birth certificate is itself a forgery. He examined a legitimate stamp placed on a long-form birth certificate copy issued by the Hawaii DOH on March 15, 2011. As seen below, the stamp, with a likeness of the signature of State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D., is placed to the bottom right of the certificate, with the date stamp to the left:

Note, that since hand stamps are used on the document issued March 15, 2011, the date stamp and the state registrar's stamp are not on a straight line. Instead, the state registrar's stamp is skewed up on the right. As seen below, the registrar's stamp applied to Obama's April 27 birth certificate has an error in the word "THE" that reads instead "TXE." The error did not show up on the stamp used one month earlier.

Also note that on the Obama birth certificate, the whole stamp is straight on the form, as seen by the red underline. Vogt concludes that a graphic artist placed the state registrar's stamp on the Obama birth certificate "to look as straight as possible." The problem, he stressed was that "no hand stamped notice like this would be placed that perfect on the page." As seen below, the "A" in Alvin appears to have a smiley face drawn in, an effect accomplished by puting an "E" in the loop of the "A" in Alvin:

Regarding the smiley face in the "A" of "Alvin," Vogt concludes: "We have to assume that either the artifact was already on the security image the forger used, and forgot to erase it, or it was placed there deliberately for some reason that we don't know yet." Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact WND. Related offers: Jerome Corsi's new book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?," is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore. Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery! Previous stories:

THE FULL STORY: See listing of hundreds of exclusive WND reports on the eligibility issue

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=308397
Attachment (3)

Wednesday, June 08, 2011
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY WND Exclusive

Posted: June 07, 2011 8:28 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
WND

The online image of a Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on April 27 as "proof positive" that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was "proof," but not of what the White House would have wanted. Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his business, says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it absolutely to be a forgery. "My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter," Irey told WND.
Paul Irey

"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a

forgery." $4.95 today! Get the inside details on what could be the most serious constitutional crisis in the nation's history, in "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by Jerome Corsi. Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been done to produce the word "Student," for example, that had two different styles of the lower case "t." "This would have been a cumbersome procedure and the average hospital clerk typist would have no

reason to change typeface with each individual letter in preparing a birth certificate," he noted. (Story continues below) Additionally, he argued, IBM only introduced the Selectric in July 1961. Such machines were in short supply in August 1961, when Obama's birth certificate purportedly was prepared by the nurses or clerks at Kapiolani Hospital, and few government offices could afford to make the switch from manual typewriters to the expensive top-of-the line Selectric typewriters when they were first introduced. Irey told WND that he is convinced the Obama birth certificate released by the White House is a cut-and-paste composite created by using different parts of presumably authentic birth certificates that had been typed in Hawaii in 1961 on different typewriters. To prove his point, Irey used as a source document the Xerox copy of the Obama birth certificate the White House press staff handed to the press assembled in the White House pressroom on April 27, as seen in Exhibit 1:

Exhibit 1: Obama long-form birth certificate given to press April 27, 2011

From this source, Irey extracted individual typed letters and prepared a chart listing each typed letter in the document, seen in Exhibit 2:

Exhibit 2: Typed letters in Obama's long-form birth document

From there, Irey compared different individual letters, producing a chart, seen here as Exhibit 3, in which the different typefaces used in the document are evident by comparison:

Exhibit 3: Letter-to-letter comparison of typeface in Obama document

To make the point even clearer, Irey annotated differences in typefaces that he felt made the argument the Obama birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 was a composite document

constructed by extracting letters as needed from various authentic 1961 Hawaiian birth certificates that had originally been typed on different typewriters, as seen in Exhibit 4:

Exhibit 4: Comparison of enlarged letters in Obama's document

In Exhibit 5, Irey draws his conclusion that the typeface analysis of the individual letters in the White House-released Obama birth certificate makes clear the document is a forgery:

Exhibit 5: Selected letter comparisons in Obama's documentation

Irey has concluded that the forgers worked from authentic Hawaii birth certificates from 1961. "The forgers did not want to make the same mistake Dan Rather made," he said. "So, they used letters they picked up from actual 1961 birth certificates, making sure the typeface that appeared in the document was authentic to the era." The mistake, Irey claims, was to use more than one birth certificate from which to select the letters. "Even if the typeface was from the period," he said, "the mistake was to forget that each typewriter has its own fingerprint. No two typewriters, even of the same make and model, will type any given letter exactly the same." Irey has produced a T-shirt that he feels provides an easily accessible understanding to his analysis, as seen in Exhibit 6:

It was in 1967 that Irey started Bergan Graphics in Fort Lee, N.J., and the company at its height had

60 employees working three round-the-clock shifts. It later operated out of the company office at Marine Plaza in Guttenberg, N.J., with a satellite office in Manhattan at 6th Avenue and 31st Street. Irey was a pioneer in photo typography, working with prestige clients that included Montgomery Ward and Acme Markets ads for the east coast.

Brochure from Irey's company

In 2007, CBS News anchor Dan Rather lost his job after Internet bloggers discovered that the typeface on what became known as the "Killian documents" attacking George W. Bush's Texas Air National Guard service during the Vietnam War were forgeries because the typeface in the documents was unavailable in military typewriters in the 1970s. A report from the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin, in fact, said critics of the Democrats in the 2004 election campaign, outraged over what they considered fabrications in the documents, "set about proving as much, pointing to the fact that one of the fonts used in the memos didn't even exist when the documents were said to have originated. Others recreated the exact papers in Microsoft Word." "The network soon realized its documents couldn't be verified and admitted its mistake." Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact WND. Related Offers: $4.95 today! Get the inside details on what could be the most serious constitutional crisis in the nation's history, in "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by Jerome Corsi! Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery! Previous stories: THE BIG LIST of eligibility 'proofers' THE FULL STORY: See listing of hundreds of exclusive WND reports on the eligibility issue

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->