Colorado's legislature and governor disagree about a one-year experiment to contract out a twelfth of the juvenile custody caseload to a private company in Brush. Policy analysts ask whether the 76% cumulative jump in juvenile custody costs doesn't indicate monopolistic behavior by state government. The present study develops data which may refute that assumption.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
IP 15 88 The Monopoly Economics of Juvenile Custody
Colorado's legislature and governor disagree about a one-year experiment to contract out a twelfth of the juvenile custody caseload to a private company in Brush. Policy analysts ask whether the 76% cumulative jump in juvenile custody costs doesn't indicate monopolistic behavior by state government. The present study develops data which may refute that assumption.
Original Description:
Original Title
IP 15 88 the Monopoly Economics of Juvenile Custody
Colorado's legislature and governor disagree about a one-year experiment to contract out a twelfth of the juvenile custody caseload to a private company in Brush. Policy analysts ask whether the 76% cumulative jump in juvenile custody costs doesn't indicate monopolistic behavior by state government. The present study develops data which may refute that assumption.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views10 pages
IP 15 88 The Monopoly Economics of Juvenile Custody
Colorado's legislature and governor disagree about a one-year experiment to contract out a twelfth of the juvenile custody caseload to a private company in Brush. Policy analysts ask whether the 76% cumulative jump in juvenile custody costs doesn't indicate monopolistic behavior by state government. The present study develops data which may refute that assumption.