P. 1
08 Bibliography

08 Bibliography

|Views: 3|Likes:
Published by Sayee Manohar

More info:

Published by: Sayee Manohar on Jun 25, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less






(1993, November). Survey Shows Strong Shopping Center Renovation Activity. Building Design & Construction, 34, 10-11. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Town Building Construction. New York: Oxford University Press. Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscape. New York, New York: John Wiley and Sons. Ashworth, G. J. (1997). Conservation as Preservation or as Heritage: Two Paradigms and Two Answers. Built Environment, 23(2), 92-102. Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice of Social Research (Eighth Edition ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Bergren, A. (1998). Jon Jerde and The Architecture of Pleasure. Assemblage(37), 8-35. Berkowitz, E. N., Kerin, R. A., Hartley, S. W., & Rudelius, W. (1997). Marketing (5th ed.): McGraw-Hill. Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is Scary, Disgusting, and Uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 443-468. Brush, R. O., & Shafer, E. L. (1975). Application of a Landscape Preference Model to Land Management. In R. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape Assessment (pp. 168-182). Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Dowden Hutchinson and Ross Inc. Buhyoff, G. J., Wellman, J. D., Harvey, H., & Fraser, R. A. (1978). Landscape Architects' Interpretations of People's Landscape Preferences. Journal of Environmental Management(6), 255-262. Calvin, J. S., Dearinger, J. A., & Curtin, M. E. (1972). An Attempt at Assessing Preferences for Natural Landscape. Environment and Behavior, 4(4), 447-470. Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press. Carls, E. G. (1974). The Effects of People and Man-Induced Conditions on Preferences for Outdoor Recreation Landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research, 6(2), 113-124. Carlson, A. A. (1977). On the Possibility of Quantifying Scenic Beauty. Landscape Planning, 4(2), 131-172. Casazza, J. A., & Spink, F. H. (1985). Shopping Center Development Handbook (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: The Urban Land Institute.


Dearden. Daniel. D. H. Landscape with Photographs: Testing the Preference Approach to Landscape Evaluation. T.. European Journal of Archeology. 15-26. Bangkok. D. J. (1976). Davis. Cultural Resources Management. Dunn.. 61-72. Downer. Traditional Cultural Properties. (2000). Devon. New York: Hill and Wang. Douthwaite. C. (1989). S. (1991). T. February 26-28. D. M. Vanishing Cultures. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Dogu. CRM. P. M. Michigan. Journal of Environmental Management(4). H. Representational Validity of Landscape Visualizations: The Effects of Graphic Realism on Perceived Scenic Beauty of Forest Vistas. Daniel. W. Colorado: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Deeben. Markets in Bangkok Metropolitan: Extension and Development. 177-199. The World in A Shopping Mall. 12-14. & Meitner. Spatial Factors Affecting Wayfinding and Orientation: A Case Study in a Shopping Mall. 32(6). Sorkin (Ed.Chiwakun. Crawford. Environmental Studies Board. (1999.). 293-306. Photography and landscape Studies. R. Coupland. & Erkip. National Geographic. W. C. (1984). Washington. C.. & Willems. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method.C. 8(1). B. 21. Fort Collins. (1996). U. 3-30). Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. T.: National Research Council. 1998). 731-755. (1992). 62-89. S. 1-12. R. (1993). Martin's Press. Proposal for A Practical System of Significace Evaluation in Archeological Heritage Management. New York. K. Paper presented at the City Space + Globalization: An International Perspective. J. St.. Landscape Planning... F. and Environmental Planning. August). A. Variation on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space (pp. 2(2). & Roberts. (1982). Global Space Meets Local Space in the TwentyFirst Century. (1999). & Boster. (1976). C. Landscape Journal. Short Circuit: Strengthening Local Economies for Security in an Unstable World. Factor Influencing Landscape Preferences: An Empirical Investigation. Assessing Aesthetic Attributes in Planning Water Resources Projects (Report of the Panel on Aesthetic Attributes in Water Resource Project ). 233 . M. In M. A. England: Green Books. Ann Arbor. (1982). Dandekar. 16(Special Issue). P. Hallewas. Thailand: Chulalongkorn University. (1998. Davis.. 11. Environment and Behavior. M. J. Groenewoudt. (2001).

Journal of Environmental Psychology. Concencus in Landscape Preference Judgements. Land Economics. C. CA: Academic Press Inc. Introduction: Place. D. Age and Management. Gibson. (1979). & Black. J. R. (1990). Massachusetts. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.. 83-90. Groat (Ed. 287. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston. H. Clustering Predictors of Landscape Preference in the Traditional Swedish Cultural Landscape: Prospect-Refuge. Espe.)... Encyclopedic. (1997). H. Giving Places Meaning . In L. P. Erlenbis-Shopping oder Versorgungseinkauf?: eine Untersuchung uber den Zusammenhang von Freizeit und Einzelhandel am Beispiel der Stadt Edmonton. Harper's Magazine.). M. L. R. New York: Routledge. and Home. San Diego. 198206. Anderson. Journal of Environmental Psychology(20). Gerhard. A. Giving Places Meaning . Appraisal Journal. L. 21. The Art of Being Off-Center. C. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin. Marburg. Journal of Urban Design.). M. M. Lahn: Gedruckt bei Wenzel. Upper Saddle River. E. 2(3). (1995). Guterson. In P.: Houghton Mifflin. Groat (Ed.. Groat (Ed. In L.). (2001). Groat.). (1998). Aesthetic Evaluation. & Shilling. F. 49-56. Differences in the Perception of National Socialist and Classicist Architecture. 297-307. 238-291). (2000). (1998). 7(3). Groat. Hagerhall. Eppli. San Diego. Enclosed. Mystery. (1993. (1995b). J. Gibian. J. Tatham. Boston. Meaning in Post-Modern Architecture: An Examination using the Multiple Sorting Task. 234 . Kanada. J. (1995). Hagerhall. Mass Culture and Everyday Life (pp.Eppli. L. (1997). Environmental Cognition: The Prediction of Preference in Rural Indiana. Value Allocation in Regional Shopping Centers. (1998). Gimblett. (1995a). Gibson. Giving Places Meaning . Large-Scale Shopping Center Development Opportunities. Forsyth. Hair. Variations on A Main Street: When a Mall is an Arcade. W. (1966). 71(1). The journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 83-92. C. Endured: One Week at The Mall of America. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 66(2). J. R. 222-234. J. J. U. In L. The Sense Considerd as Perceptual Systems. Gibian (Ed. CA: Academic Press Inc. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. M. D. 35-41. August).

A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Waterscapes. Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas After Dark.. R. 28(1). Landscape Journal. R. Herzog. L. Landscape Research News. (1993). T. V. Horayangkura. A. Journal of the American Planning Association.. K. A cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Nature. V. Landscape Perception . (1978). (2000). 301-315. (1995b). Age. A. Thailand: Association of Siamese Architects. Herzog. In A. Bangkok. 10(4). Herzog. and Environmental Preference. C. (1997). G.. 20(3). Present. (2000). T. (2000). 6(2).. 44-72.. (1987). Landscape Perception . and Future. 235 . R. G. Indharavichit. Hanyu. (1995a). & Cook. 320-344. D. Environment and Behavior. Herzog. R. Smith. T. 32(4). (1988). Cultural and Developmental Comparisons of Landscape Perceptions and Preferences. R. Sinha (Ed. Tall Buildings and the Urban Skyline: The Effect of Visual Complexity on Preferences. S. 20. 32(3). E.. (1978). K. T. Landscape Research. 10-16. D. Preference for Urban Buildings as a Function of Age and Nature Context. Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas in Daylight. A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Natural Environments: Mountains. Herzog. Herzog. L. Victor Gruen. T. (1996). R. V. Chantavilaswong. 4-6. In A. Herzog. & Smith. T. 12(1). T. Environment and Behavior. K. Heath. 20. Journal of Environmental Psychology. T. 312-326. (2000). (1992). Sustainability.). T. Semantic Dimensional Structures: A Methodological Approach.. & Inpangtang. 541-556. Mystery. 557-575. Environment and Behavior. Environment and Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 323-346. S. & Shier. B. Herzog. Helliwell. A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Field-and Forest Environments.).. 58(3). Tranquility and Danger in Urban and Natural Settings. K. San Diego. San Diego.. J. Journal of Environmental Psychology.. T. (1984). (2000). Hill. Kaplan. R. CA: Academic Press Inc. Herbert. Complexity. K. Horayangkura. and the Cellular Metropolis. Perception and Preference in Landscape Appreciation: A Review of the Literature.Hanyu. R. Environment and Behavior. Herzog. & Chernick. R. Canyons. 140-152. and Building Preference. R. & Gale. & Lim. and Deserts. 32(4). 9(1).. 555-584. Sinha (Ed. T. Danger. Development of Architectural Concepts and Styles: Past. R. Environment and Behavior.. 17. 273-284. 29-39. CA: Academic Press Inc.

(1995). D. (1985). R. Sense of Safety. Michigan: Ulrich's Bookstore.. 281-293. Knack. Landscape Planning. 14.. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. 28-59. Connecticut: Kumarian Press. W. R. S. 161-176. Environment and Behavior. & Herbert. 30(1). Kaplan. E. 18(4). 28-35. Jacobson. Globalize This? Arcade. 195216. R. S. Kaplan. R. Ecological Economics. Planning. F. (1989). J. J. (1983). S. 12(2). 26. 8(1). E. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Landscape Journal.Hough. 40-43. Out of Place: Restoring Identity to the Regional Landscape. (1998). Perception and Landscape: Conceptions and Misconceptions (USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-35). New Haven: Yale University Press. (1977). 9(2). Kaplan. 211-224. (1998). S. Concerning the Power of Content-Identifying Methodologies (USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-68). Bacaicoa. Kaplan. Kuo. C. & Kaplan. & Sullivan. Kaplan. The Analysis of Perception via Preference: A Strategy for Studying How the Environment is Experienced. Kent. Patterns of Environmental Preference. (2000). Transforming Inner-City Landscapes: Trees. Kaplan. Ann Arbor. Korten. Environment and Behavior. (1990). & Wichelns. Landscape and Urban Planning. 236 . 58(5). M.. R. Prasartsunk [Journal of Economic Analysis]. Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Preserving Farmland and Open Space. (1973).. Shopping Center: Business Requiring Careful Consideration. Inc. Cultural and Sub-Cultural Comparisons in Preferences for Natural Settings. E. L. Michigan: Ulrich's Bookstore. & Kaplan. R. Fourth International EDRA Conference. Kaplan. M. Predictors of Environmental Preference: Designers and Clients. Paper presented at the Environmental Design Research. (1979b). (1979a). Ann Arbor. Krungsri Ayudhaya Bank. Park and Shop: Some Guidelines. (1992).. When Corporations Rule the World. 18-21. (1987). (1997).. R. R. The Role of Mystery in Preferences for Shopping Malls. Kline. and Preference. C. Kaplan. (1995). West Hartford. D. P.

(1998). S. Moore & R. (1990). W. B. Southampton. (1995).T. T. Shopping Malls: Planning and Design. 4.. C. New Developments in Aesthetics for Urban Design. W. Planning. and Design (Vol. New York: Nichols Publishing Company. (1999). Plants in the Workplace: The Effects of Plant Density on Productivity. pp. P. The Atlantic Monthly. 75-86. 8. Public Life in Urban Places. Lennard. Press. 18-28. (1998).. J. Behavior. Miller. C. (1984). & Tyler. (1997). (1960). Moore. Progressive Architecture. Behavior. 671-691. Marans (Eds. The Challenge of the Ordinary: Preservation and the Cultural Landscape. B. Historic Preservation Forum. L.-S. ). Maitland. Lorch. 14-20. Volume 4.). J. X. (1998. University of Michigan. What Main Street can Learn from the Mall. H. L. 26(3).). J. Visual Preference and Implications for Coastal Management: A Perceptual Study of the British Colombia Shoreline. Cambridge: The M. 12(2). and Perceptions. (1984). New York: Plenum Press. 377-401. 59(1). 149-194). 43-44. B. (1993). & Smith. A. Their Structure and Relation to Normative Theories. In G. 31(5). Moore & R.. 1998). Bangkok's Bazaars: Business in the Open Air. The New Architecture of the Retail Mall. Toward Environment-Behavior Theories of the Middle Range: I. 276(5). Marans (Eds. and Design (Vol. T. Environment and Behavior. J. H. The Image of the City. Leinberger. 8-29. & Lennard. Ann Arbor. Lewis. L.Lagerfeld. P. Kweon. Advance in Environment. & Hong. (1985). Deal. Strip Retail Returns. Nasar. 261-281. J. Visual Preferences in Urban Signscapes. (1985). (1997). K. Environment and Behavior. Maitland. T. NY: Gondolier Press. 66(October).. Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors.. K. (1994). September. Advances in Environment. Larsen. B.I. 30(3). L. Lynch. Lee. Attitudes. (1995). G. Shopping Center Can Be Good Neighbors. T. Saen Sanuk. 237 . S. Pedestrian Movement and The Downtown Enclosed Shopping Center. 61(10). B. Lassar. Journal of American Planning Association.. 110-117. Nasar. B. J. Adams.. M. L. Environment and Behavior. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. London: Architecture Design and Technology Press. New York: Plenum Press. In G. Nasar. E.

(1992). R. On Cultural Landscapes. J. Peron. (1998). Oppewal. Englewood Cliffs. Pennartz. T. Perceptions of Interior Spaces. Purcell. 349-360. Environment and Behavior. & Timmermans. A Cross-Cultural Examination of Favorite Places. A. A. Place and Placelessness. (1969). J. 22(5). 1-5. & Elsinga. Ritterfeld. E.Nasar. & Togashi. R. House Form and Culture. 52-64. (1999). 33-47.. & Kang. Environment and Behavior. J. & Lamb. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Adults. H. P. and Architects: Differences in Perception of the Urban Environment.. Environment and Behavior. L. (1993). 16(Special Issue). H. A Framework for Studying Vernacular Design.. 97105. Inc. (1999). 45-65. Staats. What You Do and How We Think.. (1992). (1990). Landscape and Urban Planning.. 675-714. A. C. Journal of Architecture Planning and Environmental Engineering. P. London: Pion. 33(1).. Models of Preference for Outdoor Scenes: Some Experimental Evidence. Environment and Behavior. C. T. (1996). A. J.. E. 282-305. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. Newell. A.. E. & Berto. 31(1). NJ: Prentice-Hall. 33-42. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Modeling Consumer Perception of Public Space in Shopping Centers. Okada. (1997). (2001).. (1990). A. Rapoport. 16(1).. 16. & Cupchik. M. U. Peron. 30(3). Relph. Adolescents. 93-106. Rapoport. (1999). & Jasper. Purcell. 7(437). House Style Preference and Meaning Across Taste Cultures. (1976). 44. 3(11).. Rapoport. Why Preferences Differ Between Scene Types? Environment and Behavior. T. O'Neill. 30(3). (1992). G. (1998). Peron. J.. B. Rapoport. J. 238 . R. 24(4). Environment and Behavior. & Sanchez. Purcell. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review.. Environment and Behavior. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press. 348-377. An Evaluation of Models of Consumer Spatial Behavior Using The Environment-Behavior Paradigm. Subcultural and Cross-Cultural Effects on the Experience of Detached Houses: An Examination of Two Models of Experience of the Environment. 411-440. CRM. T.. J. M. Falchero. The Residential Landscape Preference of Mountain Village Dwellers. P. L. 495-514. G. C. S. E. Parker. 29(4). S. H.

11. In D. 82(4). Landscape and Urban Planning(15). D. Picture or Place? A Multiple Sorting Study of Landscape. and Interaction. L. & Brinkley. Journal of Environmental Psychology. & Canter.Rose. & Richards. Massey & P. A Place in the World?: Places. 22-26. July. (1974).. G. A Comparison of Viewer Reactions to Outdoor Scenes and Photographs of Those Scenes. L. O. Landscape Planning. and Urban Vegetation: Some Effects of Adding Trees Along City Streets. Rybczynski. and Globalization . J. Introduction: Varieties of Nature Viewing.). L. (1993). (1977). CA: Academic Press Inc. 31-34. Scott. Environment and Behavior. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-302. 17. Smardon. C. Sebastian.. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. Silverman. In A. 24(3). & Manzer. Shafer. Mysteries of The Mall (Book Review). J. & Brush. CRM. E. 5053. Management Review. Landscape Perception . M. (1990). The New York Review. D. Environment and Behavior. R. 23(3). M. Protecting Traditional Cultural Properties Through the Section 106 Process. California: Sage Publications. San Diego. 285-305. 14). L. Cultures. Perception and Aesthetics of the Urban Environment: Review of the Role of Vegetation. (1980). L.. V. 61-76. (1992). (1995). 237-256. The Use of Photographs as an Environment Presentation Medium in Landscape Studies. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 4. Giving Places Meaning . W. G. Shafer. Journal of Environmental Management.. R. Sinha. B. Sheets. Groat (Ed. 30(3). Solomon. Affect. A. (1997). 239 . (1988).). (1991). D. How to Measure Preferences for Photographs of Natural Landscapes. Cognition. 1419. 85-106. Sinha (Ed. Sellars. E.Won't Anaheim Do? Landscape. Thousand Oaks. 16(Special Issue). A. W. 263-281. (1995). Sime. Living Architecture: Differing Native and Anglo Perception of Preservation. M. R. Shuttleworth.. (1995). D. Sommer. (1995). Power Centers: The New Face of Retailing.. Creating Places or Designing Spaces? In L. S. (1993). R. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk. Wynes. Why Take a Trip to Bountiful-. Text. CRM. (1993). Jess (Eds.). 285-297. Roth. T. C. (1994. Place and Identity: A Sense of Place. 18(5). 33-40. V. Social Facilitation Effects in Shopping Behavior.

H. T. Environment and Behavior. W. 307-312. 29-44. & Heft. (1977). F. 13. E.).). Leisure Sciences. C.: The Conservation Foundation. A. 11-32. E. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Ulrich. (1996). Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes. F. Globalization and Culture. Landscape and Urban Planning. Strumse. J. A Comparative Study of User Attitudes Towards Development and Facilities in Two Contrasting Natural Recreation Areas. CA: Academic Press Inc. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Physical Determinants of Preferences for Residential Facades. Wohlwill. J. (1999).Stamps. J. Zube. S.. (1980). Demographic Differences in the Visual Preferences for Agrarian Landscapes in Western Norwey. Groat (Ed.. Journal of Environmental Psychology. (1995). A. L. (1979).C. 349-365. Wongsapak. Uzzell. Thai Shopping Center System. S. 17. Journal of Environmental Psychology(15). W. (1995). Design Review and Public Preferences: Effects of Geographical Location. All Buildings Great and Small: Design Review from High Rise to Houses. Wohlwill. H. (1968). Sensation Seeking. A. 26(3). Predicting Preference for Familiar. Everyday Objects: An Experimental Confrontation between Two Theories of Aesthetic Behaviour. & Harris. (1980). (1999). Wohlwill. Tomlinson. Design Training and Aesthetic Evaluation: An Intergroup Comparison. Perception and Psychophysics. (1984). In L. 9(4). 48-57). Washington. (1994). & Nasar. Stamps. Bangkok Bank Journal(2).). In L. L. Giving Places Meaning . 299-310. 17-31. & Wiltshire. and Architectural Styles.. E. 402-420. San Diego: Academic Press Limited. (1997). & E. E. 3(4). J. 16. Public Consensus. R. J. D. Environment and Behavior. What Belongs Where: Research on Fittingness of Man-Made Structures in Natural Setting. H. Whitfield. Groat (Ed. Whyte. Giving Places Meaning . 31(6). Amount of Stimulus Exploration and Preference as Differential Functions of Stimulus Complexity. D. (1986). F. 264-280. Whitfield. L. 240 . In T. (1995). Fort Collins. E. F. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Journal of Leisure Research. G. J.. Stamps. Wohlwill. 723-751. San Diago. Daniel. Response to Congruity or Contrast for Man-Made Features in Natural-Recreation Settings. The Myth of the Indoor City. Colorado: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. A. J. Driver (Eds. Assessing Amenity Resource Values (pp. A. 4(5).

Virginia Tech. 6-33. (1995). J. 471-507. 24(4). Landscape Perception: Research. 1-33. (1999. 241 ..Woods. National Geographic. Environment and Behavior. Blacksburg. H. E. A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Preferences for Landscape Styles and Landscape Elements. & Taylor. R. Zube. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Assessment of Room Friendliness. Application. G. Paper presented at the Architectural Psychology Conference. D. J. 9(1). Zwingle. J. M. Yang. & Brown. Sell. (1992). A world Together. E. Landscape Planning.. (1969). Environmental Factors that Influence Preference and Price Perceptions of Commercial Landscapes and Storefronts. Wools. B. J. T. (1982)..-E. and Theory. University of Strathclyde. L. Dalanhui. August).

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->