P. 1
History of Golden FaTe String Theory

History of Golden FaTe String Theory

|Views: 143|Likes:
Published by Charles A Laster
History of the Golden FaTe string theory being developed by the String Theory Development Group on Face Book. This is the highlights of the first two months posts showing important developments.
History of the Golden FaTe string theory being developed by the String Theory Development Group on Face Book. This is the highlights of the first two months posts showing important developments.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Charles A Laster on Jul 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/08/2011

pdf

text

original

History of The Golden FaTe

String Theory Model by the String Theory Development Group
First Two Months ending June 30, 2011 Shreyak Chakraborty, Mark Aaron Simpson, Charles A. Laster And the Many Members of The String Theory Development Group On Face-Book String theory is often considered too complex for the average person to understand. The Golden FaTe is not like most string theories, as Shreyak put it "Most theories of extra dimensions lie in the depth of abstract mathematics. Therefore what we need is a more logical approach with elegant modeling. FaTe is a step in that direction...FaTe is mostly based on super-string theory, QED and QCD." [1] One of the advantages of string theory is that it can be mapped and this allows a visual representation of the equations. Examination of these models are often revealing. Mark's [2] skill at this aspect allows the average person to appreciate the beauty of string theory and understand it better. As FaTe includes QED and QCD, concepts in string theory can be explained in terms other disciplines of physics can relate to. The work of Charles [3] also bridged several disciplines of physics, and can provide simple examples for the non-physicist. The Golden FeTe is the combined effort of the String Theory Development Group founded by Mark Simpson[2a]. The physicist should read published material for details, as this is meant for the average reader as much as possible Golden FaTe The String theory group was started on April 28 2011 and grew rapidly in the number of members and the amount of research examined. The speed at which a virtual group process information and reach sound conclusions is amazing. Some people joined as they felt the group had similar views, if not the same approach. As all this input and evaluation came from many people and many fields of physics, the results are more harmonious. What mark told the group on April 28 at 9:30pm is also true for those reading this. "The beginning of this project may be a bit tedious for non-physicists, with all these definitions being tossed in, but I want to provide a professional start so late-comers can integrate this idea into existing projects. They can "build bridges" between theories so as to complete their own valuable work. The math will make even non-physicists into competent "stringers" after we get rolling." Building Blocks

Mark April 28 at 9:17pm "One of the most interesting conceptual problems I have wrestled with in QTO is the idea of using nodes. They are the string building blocks. What would tend to keep them associated? In other words, the information is defined as directional, so why would there be a tendency to remain associated if we are not using energy or ST Local....When it occurred to me that the rules of Order from Thermodynamics (Entropy) as a higher order function may be rooted in the rules of strings, but for information rather than energy !! I think we should use the rules of entropy directly, without modification, for the values distributed by strings. At least until we find a better definition. For information , this would be the simplest digital data stream when combining two digital data streams from 2 strings, tends to lower the entropy of both contributing streams and stabilize and synchronize the data flow as waves. Simply put, as wavors synchronize, the system has lower entropy with respect to data processed." What Mark was trying to put into string theory was the relationship for wave interaction in strings. The Node as well as the amplitude of a wave on a string must be taken into account. Particles modeled as strings have the greatest persistence, they are more stable, if they intersect at a node. This was factored into his mapping technique. This also solved some objections from other fields. Mark April 28 at 10:39pm "Another explanation. Many of you have seen my albums with "tiling maps" and probably wondered what it was all about. What does this have to do with strings? When we talk about strings and wavelength, most scientists are worried that we would have to arrange individual molecules and atoms in space to make quantum machines, and the more complex this pattern is, the more likely for errors and failures with the quantum device. I considered this implementation problem 20 years ago. Because ST Local has time (and therefor frequency) as a normal limit, then QTO does not have the same limits. Frequency becomes periodicity, and that what tilings represent. They are a wave table of integrated periodic elements. If the wave table is active, the strings are emulated in the super-dimension above the plane of matter. That means the string values are the transitional value moving from one tile to the next (or the half-wave function !! so the strings could be written in a plane in the space above the tiles in a half wave spacial table. Alternately, if you have a string wave written (soon enough), you can transpose it to the tiling format!. when you want to combine strings, they can be applied and combined to produce the tilings. Hope that answers many questions. Mark" What we would call frequency is represented by a periodic procession of tiles for the wave and node points on a string. This also suggests a harmonic relationship of repeated patterns. The concept of wave/particle duality must be examined as a whole. All pure particle models have flaws, which is why there are so many of them. This grid lets the model represent particles a way purely particles models can not. The grid can be set or transform to another size, so it is versatile. String notation needed defined at the start as well. "My first Statement, with regard to a system of string building, is to restate that I am going to use quantum time (QT) constructs. The values of -1, 0, and +1 will gain meaning not only as values of digital nature for the nodes on a string, they will be given design form to represent the values (as a math statement should) and a corresponding property with

respect to QT . I will also make notation for the math that is as direct to it's definition as possible, so statements are always of the same order as the string order itself. Which brings us to the first Rule: String construct and values are a linear integration of Quantum-Time Order (QTO). second Rule: As strings are combined (or gain value complexity), they can gain dimensionality (degrees of order). The practical result of this gain in order is integration into Space-Time Local (STL), which is our familiar measured time. Third rule: As strings are combined, or gain complexity, to a level of 3 degrees of order, as " 0-prime" designation I use in my models, at a given location in QTO, then a value of STL is also achieved that corresponds with particle behavior and function. That provides us with STL being a function of QTO !! . That should be enough Rules for now to get friends started on understanding the system I will use. later I will provide notation for review and testing so we can work together on writing strings. We will do simple strings first, of course, that are the building blocks of QT. I sincerely hope this becomes a group project and anyone with intuitive suggestions for building the model contact me as the mediator and we will present your contributions with acknowledgments. Sincerely, Mark" May Soon patterns in the work was emerging. Mark May 2 at 2:09am "I think I may have found infinity fractal for 1 dimensional quantum prime, using the 3 integer -1,0,+1 . that means the sub wave node on each string is same order and function higher and lower, to infinity. each string made of same wavors , and each wavor is string with more nodes of same type wavor. Each string compose wavors has same architecture , down to infinity. Theoretically, That would constitute a proof of lowest domain." Or as basically, you get progressively smaller in this patten as you approach zero, to a finite point. This was then factored into mapping string theory. The same pattern can be represented in a string. Mark May 1 at 10:29am "I have made some descriptions of "theoretical" wavor functions that can form strings in the quantum space. Some have been design as "null value". Some have been shown to store values. Some have been shown to conduct value from A to B across quantum space. All this without any atomic structure of particle or matter. For dark matter, the theoretical implication is, a possibility that light is processed in a part of space where it is neither reflected or absorbed, not translated into other form of energy. That means it is probably disassembled into waveforms of lesser dimensions and beyond our observation. The quantum space is a likely candidate for that to occur. This space could represent what space was like before a Universe formed in it. The other possibility is that another type of matter formed under different quantum rules. It is likely this matter then does the same function , of disassembling the photons (deconstructing light). It would logically follow that this matter was composed of different quantum rules and constructs than the ones in our local space. As we go further into a model for strings, we may be able to gain insight as to how those quantum calculations could perform. That is my thought on the subject of Dark Matter." May 1 at 8:46pm

Mark May 3 at 6:33pm "Analysis of the day : The constructs of Quasi-data, which are 1 and -1 (not 0 !) appear to gain order at the expense of gaining dimension. I believe in this quasi data vector field 0 was only a static boundary between 1 and -1, and not a local quantum value at all. In other words, 1 and -1 were separated by a 0 field, not a 0 value on a node. The symbols these pre-string quasi data constructs do resemble historic symbolism , much to my astonishment. I will publish this construct soon. There are equal numbers of primordial data constructs as might be the first level strings. 3 are 1 dimension twist clockwise, 3 are counterclockwise. The combination of 2 ccwise with 1 cwise gives a 1 dimensional mobious string with 1, 0 and -1 possible value nodes. Also 2 cwise plus 1 ccwise also provides the identical mobious string in 1 dimensional space (but now 2 degrees order). It takes a minimum of 6 quasi-data in quantum space (2 dimensions) to produce exactly 2 mobious loops of string that are identical (2 degrees order, 1 dimension). A dimension is lost in the process, but there is a gain of order that is 3 times the order of the 6 inputted quasi data. Also, we gain the node value 0 in the data set of the new construct, due to the asymmetry of the twists of 1-dimensional space. This discovery was unexpected. I expected to find 0 as the starting point. Even I have some personal bias. This is some brain twisting math. Hardest thing I have ever experimented with. I suppose it should be the toughest puzzle ever."

Note: On May 4 at 7:39pm it was realized that there could be two 0 data sets. "Analysis for the Day. "Quasi-Datum" I have started using a new term, without providing the definition. To tell the truth, I was trying it out for a few days to see if it was useful and applied to the topic I just moved to. Since my investigation by mathematics has started taking me to the potential lower levels of dimension, and the possible constructs, it is an area that was previously beyond my imagination. It occurred to me that the "Quasiparticle" term turned out to be very true, as I will show in a few days. So why could I not find a "quasi data " bit array, where the data (as 1,0,-1) or even a less complete set (1,-1) or (0) be the underlying dimension. Add to the data any new quality of order , and the "data" might actually function differently in the next dimension down. I have no reason to expect either case. I expect to stop my investigation when the lowest construct becomes either repetitive, with no further meaning, or when it becomes incomprehensible in it's construct. I will begin the graphic presentation I have already imagined, going 2 more levels of dimension and order, into the nature of data and space , towards the quasi-data field and then to the initial condition for data implementation. I sort of have the "beginning" scripted as "The first data read, and the first "data write" in quantum space. My earlier comment posted was an indication that I do not think space was data 0 . Since I have only mathematics to test the theory(s) , I may present it both ways and why I may favor one explanation for another. Because of the Nature of the problem, it is irrelevant , when you have 2 datum types , to worry about which might be named as the first and the other the second. I have chosen to make the first data as +1, because the conventions

of higher physics we use , has the neg charged particle as the mobile charge in most models. So the primordial data, which leads to quasi-data, will use the convention as positive space. That, I am sure, will make it easier in the long run to examine my logic (no double negatives). Hope you enjoy my short thoughts for the day. Mark"

This allowed the twisting of strings to be represented in the model. The Wavor Definitions were posted on May 3 2011.

"I have posted the Wavor set definitions. Some of you will find them a bit uncomplicated. But that is the responsibility of publishing. The 2 curious details that I would point out, relate to my post today. 1st, The level of Prime in each series is a higher order than the 1 and -1 orders. That is because the strings that composed of Wavors 0 prime types are the ones needed to create the next level up 0- double-prime (and so on) !! That explanation will clear up when I go down a few levels to quasi-data, and also up each level of order or dimension. In other words....you need to string o-prime type wavors to create the next level up 0-prime type. What I will try to discover next is the minimum number of levels from the lowest Quantum Field (quasi-data) to the first level of quasi-particles. This series will no doubt provide me with further constructs to present, that literally take us on a tour of the lower dimensions according to Strings. The 2nd detail is about the reason I have stayed with the "Mobious" symbol, that represents a 1 sided construct with 3 nodes. That symbol has always reminded me of the abstractions I might have to manage if I took on this mathematical challenge. As it is turning out, I am fairly certain the symbol is relevant at the 4th level of Wave-0 , which goes to wave-0 ''''' (5th level of 0-prime) which becomes partially 3-dimensional !!!. I have actually found the quasi-particle construct that the mobious integrates into !!. So there is definitely more abstraction to manage. And the continuity from the smallest possible data forms , to the smallest forms of matter, is almost apparent to me. Hopefully I will be able to translate this to everyone else.....Best Regards, Mark" This ability to form a Mobious in string theory was very useful and would be seen in latter diagrams. I can not overemphasis how much information was passing in discussion during this process. Often some things appeared that was not expected. May 5 at 9:46am Mark, "Thought for the day: The Wavors, simple strings , string loops , and Superstrings, all have several things in common. First, they are constantly recalculating the space they are present in. Any new neighbor values are assimilated as inputs and the collective construct seeks the highest degree of order possible. Even if a dimension is lost, order is to be gained. That which

maintains the lowest entropy of the system of data flow is formed. When there is no more order to be gained within a specific level of dimension, a new "WAVOR 0- prime" data construct is obtained and the next dimension is ascended to. New strings are then formed from these ascended wavors, with new higher order forms of strings and string constructs. Eventually the Degree of Critical Order is obtained which produces quasi-matter function such as Hydrogen singlet. The highly layered string constructs become both partially 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional (within the same construct). The calculations of the strings and order manifests as the functions that are electron quantum states, and also isotopic conformity. The next level of string formation (as atoms) is molecular and particle behavior such as the electron and photon, which can travel on linear strings that extend from the center of the torus string formations to other neighboring atoms. This is likely the basis for Entropy effects in matter and higher forms of the same." What this means is the model seeks highest degree of order, even if it must lose a dimension to find the lowest entropy of the system. In other words, nature finds the most efficient way to do something.

Mark May 6 at 1:32am "Here is another way to understand why I am producing constructs, or a backbone of data, to try to Unify Theories. First, if you assume everything can be connected, then it must be connected by information. The simplest information root of all data is digital. So, if there is a common thread through all the dimensions, it will be a series of digital codes and integrations that "strings" it all together. Since there is no format for these levels, or rules on when to integrate, I am trying to make a form we can work with that allows property of dimensions and the types of data to be mapped as digital. Because spin is involved in spacial constructs, I added a -1 to make sure I could code for pairs in all dimensions. It also provides symmetry for +1 in the lower dimensions, where I may not use all 3 bits to describe data in 1 dimension. It has turned out to be consistent with relativistic physics, meaning I do not find this String construct to be lacking so far in any quality’s needed to map and translate to relativistic physics. It will only require some equations to be written base 3." The theory must be in agreement with relativity. Now what the posts often don't show is all the people and comments that went into this on a daily basis. The next days post by Mark does reflect this. May 7 at 6:09pm Mark,"Thought For The day: I would state, for the record, that I was pleasantly surprised, after designing these wavor constructs, that they will prove useful in making the necessary calculations, and make a difficult concept manageable. My work here , online, is not scripted. I do not know in advance what my chances for success are. I am, in effect, sharing my process of design in an intimate way. I did not know if these logical constructs would have the necessary utility to properly work in the many dimensional levels. I did not know if I could translate waves to Digital based code. I was even a bit nervous about it. Especially when you begin to understand the importance of turning constructs of waves into particles. There is no magic wand. No special effects. Either it is correct, or it is not. I have been lucky enough with some intuitive choices in design to be close enough at each step, that I could test and modify the concept without having to start over. This comes from reading other people's research and looking at the methods, not so much the conclusions. I am optimistic that I can provide the lower dimensions in a reasonably close model that will create debate (of course), but only

in the philosophical sense. The model itself will be very useful. I have had to constantly discover the property’s of the math at each dimensional level, and transition between the levels,but , you know what? It has been the most fun I have ever had ! And that is what I really hope the legacy of this project will be to those who learn to use these designs. You are going to have lots of fun............"

May 8 at 7:54pm A good example was given of how the 3 strings loop with the pascal pyramid.

Mark "An example of 3 strings looped into a node of 0-prime class. Example indicates strings will be mapped to a 0-triple prime because the value of 1 is assigned to the node, which indicates a Proton (+1). The Pascal pyramids are shown in 3d perspective as a wave table set on the basis of the Proton mapping. One pyramid is shown inverted. The 2 pyramids suggest the real geometry of bonding that arises from orbital symmetry based on proton strings. It also shows the string loops are a triple prime torus." May 10 at 11:39pm Corrections had to be made along the way as the model was tested. Mark "Well, I spent most of today working on page 2, to show joining a single Prime series string into a Double -Prime series. The idea is to show the intersection of the strings and map the calculation. Probably the most tedious thing to do for the first time. Add to that I am learning what the calculation actually is. So....of course, the first time I map it (4 hours worth) I get the rotational calculation backwards. And it is obvious because the junction calculations are 2 steps of rotation instead of 1 single rotation for each string intersection. This leads to a change in order: for example , yesterdays data values clockwise repeat 1, 0, and -1 in the order. 1 dimensional calculations have no "other side" you simply can't flip them over and reverse the order. That's part of 1 dimensional rules of order. So, if you do a conversion and the next dimension is in reverse order, you haven't done the Prime calculation properly. So.....it will take until tomorrow evening (24 hours) for the double-prime integration. It really looked Incredible too, but it wasn't correct. I deserve a vacation after I do the Triple Prime Integration !!" May 12 at 12:04pm Mark explains some important aspects of the emerging model. "The thought for the Day : LOGICAL Constructs: if your digital code was only 2 bits, say 1 and 0, there would be no order to the data. 10101010 repeating the values alternately, would be identical to 01010101 etc in a 2 dimensional infinite string. However,series order [ -1,0,+1,-1,0,+1...infinity] IS DISTINGUISHABLE FROM[-1, +1,0,-1,+1,0....infinity]. so that allows for 2 primary and discrete quantum waves to exist. I believe matter is one direction of rotation, and antimatter is the other. Simple as that. 2 dimensional constructs do not have another side to flip over to. These are vectors and that accounts for a dimension. I have not gotten to complex super-strings yet, but the basis code has to provide for this

from the beginning of the synthesis of the new math. The other benefit is when strings gain order and dimension, and the + and - assignments can be used to track spin, and then , polarity , which are all transitional data values into higher dimensions and order." "other levels of complexity could exist for 10101, such as 10110111 but then there would have to be an equally complex source code generator. My lower level dimensional model is the minimal complexity to describe a Unique set of data rules. It also is a mimic of Schrodinger code. The cat is alive =+1, the cat is dead -1, the cat is neither alive or dead =0." "you will find that all wavector calculations are clockwise and also follow spin rules for discrete angular velocity" The emerging model started to makes some definition and requirements of its own. The first hint that two primary and discrete quantum waves were at work, each with a vector added for an added dimension. Thus spin, polarity could have a simple + or - notation or a vector. Mark suggests this might be a different form of math being represented. May 14 at 9:43am Mark sums up some aspects of the choice of 1,0,-1. "Thought for The Day: For those of you following string conceptualization: the other supporting reason I use 3 data bits for the string model (and not 2) is because of the Schrodinger logic. The logic must allow for all 3 cases for quantum logic because the integral the string defines exist (+1), be destroyed( -1), and not exist at all (0). That is because the string data must represent more than 0 and spin (-1,1) or charge (at higher dimensions). at lower dimensional levels it represents the definition of the logic of the string system itself." So a string just carries information until it is acted on, changing the data. At its simplest, strings are not that complex, but can be made so. FaTa made the group seek the best yet simplest solution to an problem or approach through testing. It is close to this model, but having 3 bits instead of just 1. Quantum information - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia During this time Shreyak had been busy with integrating all this into the FaTe in all dimensions. The topic of gravity was making its presence known. Shreyak May 16 at 11:13am "1. Gravity is a force in quantum level while relativity says its a property of space 2.quantum gravity is not being proved while relativity is going high with new proofs 3.string theory,which proposes unification is lost in abstract mathematics 4. what we now require is a logical theory rather than an abstract notational one" Shreyak had been busy working from his end, and like Mark, that the possibility of a different number system could be used in string theory, and found examples of what he saw in the emerging model. Shreyak May 19 at 1:25am www.scientific american.com/article.cfm?id=the-strangest-numbers-instring theory "See this page. There is a possibility of number systems beyond our own! As i predicted earlier!"

Octonion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This old and half forgotten system of math did work perfectly with the emerging model. Mark May 19 at 1:36pm "The Octonion theorem will take 2 steps to test against the current string model. The reason is I did not post the simple looped string calculation (i went straight to 0-doubleprime) so I did not post single prime. The 0-single prime is a simple twist and results in what I call a reflective function. I will present the design later, because I already had it near completion. It was at the time I knew I needed to present the formatting design because it would require the model for simple loops and simple twist. In other words, why would simple reflective be important. Also I knew 0-double prime would gather more outside interest (truthfully). So , in order to present the design for Octonion, which is not as obvious as you might think, I have to put in place the single prime calculation . It will serve as a ring within the Brane (but no simple ring). Then we can look at the cross-dimensional calculation for this field with a visual model!! Very Exciting....A Brane calculator.." Turns out Octonion mathematics had been used in dimensional mapping. E8 (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 21 Shreyak invited and Mark added Charles to the group. Shreyak's efforts on the model were bearing fruit. May 22 at 6:17am when he posted the FaTe diagram for the SP model of hyperspace and for Mark May 22 at 11:28am "Based on the Universal formatting experiment, which has 168 points (8 times 21), I believe we can calculate the constants for the Brane levels in The Universe. It is likely that this can directly can model the Mass of particles and also gravity and EM fields. It also is an intuitive model for why waves are propagated across space (the dense dark band(s). It is complex As there is a cascade to calculate that represents the dependency effects across Branes into other dimensions, but as I theorized earlier, it will likely follow the fractal nature of the strings dimensional information system. The reason I called the design Inverse Octonion, is that rather than the circle sitting inside the triangle, we have triangles radiating around each concentric circle. Also it is duly noted that space is indeed curved for every dimension to a varying degree, and that Our dimensions have the least curvature to calculate (but there is still some

curvature). That can be calculated with calculus efficiently enough for the start. We may have a more accurate way to devise constants, rather than approximations, if we go back to very basic field analysis. I just wanted to indicate there is more than one way to translate the theorem for use." By this point it was clear that Shreyak's and Mark's models were merging into a more unified and complete string theory framework. By May 25 Charles was starting to see the relationship between their emerging model and his work. Mark May 25 at 10:54am "Thought For Today: Right now I am defining Dimension 0 to be the format of Null for the Universe, or , simply put, the format of space before the Universe filled it with data/waves/ matter. Since Dark Matter is made up of waves, I do not think it is Dimension 0. I do think it has a dimensional value as matter, and it may be a different complexity compared to our Matter." Charles May 25 at 4:53pm "A string can be modeled as a number of 0 dimensional harmonic oscillators. This was how strings were defined in the early days of string theory. So Dimension 0 would be where the vacuum and source field meet and combine." "This is similar to the approach I took in my paper for undergraduates, and corresponds to Time=0 in the QED electron equation that was used." By the end of May several things mentioned before needed solved. There needed to be a "double solution" for waves, and the center solution had to have a finite size. Charles had started to see how his semi-classical models related to the string theory model the group was developing. May 28 at 11:58pm How my work ties in with string theory But despite these difficulties, Shreyak was making progress adapting the standard FaTe string model.

Shreyak May 29 at 3:11am "This is a new approach to the standard FaTe. Here I have used circular non euclidean geometry. This is a rather casual diagram. But it showcases strings better. The two D3 branes (of different dimensions) are shown as a group at the intersection of the two ellipses. The structure of the highest dimensions, D=10 and D=11 are a bit different due to the presence of singular structures. An additional feature is the set of horizons[blue] that form due to particle movement between the D3 branes." Constants like the Golden ratio were fitting into the model as well. May 29 at 10:31pm Mark "I like Manoj Joshi post about the Golden Ratio. I will begin to do a series of experiments based on that geometry. We will extract as much as possible o as to how it fits into the greater model we are building for String Theory. I will start simple and then expand on this complex curve series. Since I did a series completely on circles, I am sure there will be significant relevance, and it is possible this is the next logical step in investigation of higher geometry"

"I have read the history on the Golden Ratio. I chose to modify the golden rectangle formula to have a logistical enumerator of it, so I can imagine it better. The modification of the simple algebra provides this form (a^2) - (b^2) = ab . It allows me to also make a logical statement. The conditions to create an a and b series of Golden Ratio must follow the rule that the difference between the 2 squares (a times a, minus, b times b) must equal the product of the 2 root values (a times b). This form allows me to map the progression in my mind more easily than the other expressions of the form. The relationship to the square root of 5 is also duly noted as fundamental to the numerology of the formatting experiment. I will see just what forms are generated before trying to theorize an application of that math." Shreyak May 30 at 11:49am "FUNDANENTAL ASSUMPTION OF THE GOLDEN FaTe: May 30th,2011- For any FaTe model, we can assume euclidean geometry for a certain region. But the complete model will use non euclidean geometry for a given universe. All d cuboids for 11>D>0 are similar and using Golden Ratios to find certain logarithmic spirals that may correctly explain certain warping's." Charles May 30 at 6:28pm had seen more relationships between his vector spin model and the finite size for a point particle. Spin, Charge and the Fine-Structure Constant "While aimed more at QED, there is some string theory elements in this that might be useful to the group." Shreyak May 30 at 8:36pm FORMAL SUPPORT- May31st,2011 I really liked Charles A Laster's note. It can be a basis for a better description of the beginning and expansion of the universe along with loop quantum gravity. Moreover, it can be applied to both string theory and quantum mechanics for finding answers to some big question. Shreyak It was at that time that we all know we were thinking along the same lines, but from different directions. The group size, and activity of all members was on the rise. Mark May 31 at 6:56pm 5-31-2011 Weekly Update : "There are two ongoing major efforts within the Group. Charles A Laster and Shreyak Chakraborty are working on a Conceptualization / Brainstorming that may lead to a model of the electron that better satisfy Quantum Physics and String Theory, while attempting to bring classical physics measured values and equations into the concept to satisfy various requirements for electron observed experimental performance. It is a very difficult task to apply the imagination, and previous research, all into 1 concept. What we can hope to gain from this is at the least a brain-storm of the concepts that fit into the model, and those that require a re-thinking. It is also possible we may gain a little more than that....which is a Better Plan to attack the problem of modeling the Electron itself." "The Other Effort is My Own, which is to provide resource materials for the field matrix model upon which the electron travels (and is 1 dimensionally dependent to) for Orbital Mapping according to String Theory. Although I have presented formatting based on circles to facilitate the propagation of strings within dimensions outside the Domain of our own dimensions, an interesting thing occurs as these functions enter into ours. The functions must change their dimensional integration as they leave the atom and enter into Super-atomic interaction. This is accomplished, in part , due to the high complexity and order of the internal dimensionality of the atom. It is also due to the theoretical function of the strings per-calculating the translation/transcription to our dimensions. That is to say, the strings prepare the space to induce the electron particle into the natural space and produce an

effect. This alters the theory on electron dynamics in a profound way. I will leave the discussion of the dimensionality for now to Charles and Shreyak, and the rest of group. You should enjoy the moment and assist them with your comments, or make your own. I will provide separate dialogue for friends who wish to work on the formatting problems I am publishing based on the squares. They represent the fields in "less curved" space we normally consider "linear". I hope this update helps to get others involved Best Regards, Mark"

Mark made a summery statement for the month. "SUMMARY STATEMENT: May-2011 I wanted to take the time to set the tone, and address a few important concepts, so we can make progress as a group. I personally got involved in the String Theory in order to create a way for people to understand and use the property’s of space. The property’s of matter will also benefit , if the string model is created, because I consider matter to be the result of the property’s of space. I also think the same way about radiation, gravity, EMF and speed of light. The biggest concern I hear from the men of science is "Are you trying to prove strings exist?" The answer is no. In fact it is not relevant to prove they exist. Strings serve me as a way to calculate the mathematics and property’s of space, which is not considered an existence. We do not use any constructs of time to develop the theory. Time will be added back when we need to apply the string theory to matter and energetic systems. What is clear to me, is that not all space is the same, all space is full of traveling waves, and it is in this space that we must have a way to change the property’s of the space in order to move matter and energy through it for new purposes. Additionally, the property’s of space closely associated with atomic and sub-atomic particles is of special interest in the sciences. The development of string theory will provide a way to describe the performance and relationships of complex space in a way that is not ambiguous or arbitrary. My personal skills in turning the abstract into the comprehensible and useful....will hopefully play a large role in helping the physicists in the group to solve real problems. The other great concern I am asked to explain is regarding the energy cost associated with a string theory modeled as a data system and it's integration into space-time functions. "Where does the energy come from?" "How can you measure strings and show they are there?" The answer to that is in part: strings are a theoretical representation of values (data) held in space, and this data defines what is possible mathematically to be exchanged, and what data and calculations in space cannot occur. The energy that produces the results of these calculations (acts on the data) comes from the system itself in our dimensions. At this time we consider the cost to the system of reading or writing data to strings, causes a change of order in the arrangement of the strings (a spacial recalculation similar to entropy), rather than in a relationship that involves matter/mass and exchange of energy. Our fundamental data is a 2 dimensional function of spin, as a 3 bit system, and 1 degree of order. we call it a wavector. We also use a construct of dimensions and Brane (membrane) to further the complexity of the string system theory. This is to compartmentalize discretely different spacial functions. Some functions are abstract. We apply the rules of system parity/symmetry and Domain as a way to simplify the modeling process. This requires logic and models and is the ongoing process in the Group's activity. The models are there for you to test and help develop. Enjoy!!" June June started off with a bang.

Shreyak June 2 at 2:40am "SUMMARISED DESCRIPTION OF THE GOLDEN FaTe- June 2nd,2011Post 1 of 2 The Golden FaTe is based on D=11 geometry along with the use of spirals and golden ratios. We first divide each dimension(D>4) into various rows and columns that looks like grills in a cuboid. This enables us to use Golden Ratios anywhere in D>4. Then we can show that all intersections lie on a combined Logarithmic Spiral for all D>4 i.e 11>D>4 which are considered chaotic sub-atomic dimensions. This means all particles in chaotic states in D>4 lie on the spiral. We may however use many spirals to show different warping. The whole model is symmetric on a large scale." "Post 2 of 2 for SUMMARISED DESCRIPTION OF GOLDEN FaTeAnother major advantage of this 'spiralisation' is that we can put dark energy in the equations and show its emission spirally from the extra dimensions(D>4). This will also lead to expansion as the spiral opens outside. All these constructs apply better to the early universe and supports loop quantum gravity as direction of spirals can be reversed to input gravity. I have still not completed the actual diagram since it is a little difficult to draw spirals and grills in cuboids. I shall post it as soon as possible. With best regards,Shreyak" Shreyak June 2 at 3:48am "DETAIL OF GOLDEN FaTe- 06/03/11 The reversal of the spirals that i mentioned below can be done by transforming the equation of the spiral. This leads to the input of both gravity and dark energy. Shreyak" "The polar equation of Logarithmic Spiral is a very useful dimensional equation " Shreyak June 2 at 10:22am "FaTe DESCRIPTION OF EARLY UNIVERSE USING BIG BANG THEORY- June 3rd,2011 The singularity has a set of fibers as a circle at a constant radius. As gravity increases, these fibers began to twist around a force line. This twisting continues till a gravitational lock takes place. After a time the energy exceeds a certain limit and these fibers rapidly untwist causing a big bang. Later the universe expands and follows no boundary condition. This is the essence of the 'start pt definition' of singularities that allow them to create universes but also treat their past as infinity." Mark June 2 at 8:36pm "I will provide an explanation soon regarding the posting of what first appear to be simple field maps, and how they relate mathematically to the more complex fractal maps and the Golden Ratio"

Mark June 2 at 9:09pm "I believe this simple illustration shows the relation best between the Wavector, the circle formatting, and the Golden Ration. from a geometric point of view. The next post will be from a Fractal reference."

Mark June 2 at 9:17pm "I want to present the most simple of the Fractal's that fits all the requirements for a Fractal Described Membrane (Brane) which actually illustrates both sides simultaneously. It challenges the idea that the Brane needs to be a round doorway you walk through. It has the complexity/symmetry and functionality (spin) with a "string -like bridge" construct, that would make it selective to passing data cross-dimensionally. The simple field also makes this a good choice to start from as far as modeling. It is very sophisticated and yet perfectly simple and easy to describe."

Mark 6-3-2011 "Summations: For those of you recently joining, the active topics are the Golden Ratio, gathering Fractal representations to apply to two models: The quantum Brane and also the Electron -orbital model. We are testing the idea that fractals play an important role in processing the data from multiple strings and providing a simple data set (compression) to the Brane for performance as a selective gate ( between dimensions). We try to create the simplest possible mechanism and approach and this method of analyzing problems has worked well so far. The Overall String Theory Project , now known as " The Golden FaTe ": is being mapped out both on micro-geometric 2-D sections of spacial analysis, and also on a macro scale. We are looking for a "best fit" in addition to using some intuition and discussion of each conceptualization and it's merits. The goal is to create a potential model of quantum orbital property’s as simply as possible. There is also a on-going discussion that is very enlightened with regards to "consciousness" and quantum theory’s role in the mental processes. New members please review our art, it will help orient you to where we may have deviated from the mainstream string theory in concepts. Enjoy !!" Shreyak June 3 at 12:59pm "WORK UPDATE- June 3rd, 2011. I am currently working on FaTe singularity and fiber constructions. This includes defining particles and interactions on closed circular fibers Shreyak" Mark June 3 at 12:11am Strings and M-Theory "I posted this after reading it. I am pleased that we have arrived at very close to the same place in theory that is described in this very fine essay, written by Stephen Hawking. It is added as a doc in it's entirety."

Shreyak June 5 at 9:20am "PARTICLES AROUND SINGULARITY. June 4th,2011 I have already told u about the presence of a fiber bunch in the form of a a circle of constant radius around the singularity. We now represent particles as a function of these fibers. To do this we use the equation of a free particle and harmonic oscillators for the fibers. a functional variation is now shown to exist around the singularity near the force line. This actually means that there is a transformation of the fiber function as the fibers twist at a very high speed. It has a physical effect on particles. The fibers spiral towards the singularity. We assume the singularity to be at (0,0) for D=0 I really think that this can work out well mathematically Sincerely, Shreyak" Shreyak June 5 at 9:48am

Shreyak June 6 at 6:34am "WORK UPDATE- June 6th,2011. For eq.s regarding D=11 fiber constructs, one may define equation of a particle separately on the fiber and near the singularity. The equation for particle on the fiber uses equation of a free particle and harmonic equation of the fiber that is a fiber function. I'll try to post real eq.s soon. Shreyak" Shreyak June 6 at 3:39am "Update: FaTe SYMMETRY June 6th,2011 In the fiber construct,there exists a symmetry between singularity-fiber system and the hydrogen atom model with the nucleus as singularity and the standing wave (electron) as any particle defined as a function of the fibers. Shreyak" Shreyak June 6 at 8:19am "FaTe SYMMETRY Update- June 6th,2011 Here, i give u some similarity and symmetry relations for FaTe golden version N_u=S_ii and ø_ß= §ä (change in harmonic oscillation) Also, N_u~ø_ß and S_ii~§ä We also define a Symmetry Function for interval 11>D>4 as f(Sy)={+n if D>4 {-n if D<4 Sincerely, Shreyak" Mark June 6 at 10:52am "The Theory we have been exploring in this group, for the Gravitometric

effect, revolves around a calculation for cross-dimensional field effects. Basically, the assumption that spacial fields are responsible for gravity is not sufficient to provide a basis for the observed gravity in a closed system. The concept that gravity is the result of cross-dimensional field adjustments , regulated by the Brane, is highly appealing and strongly correlates with the behavior of gravity on matter. The degree of Unity (cross-membrane dimensional exchange) is the component that determines the gravity field effect for each Universal Dimensional System. That is , theoretically, because the data across the Brane Fibers becomes instantly available to both the system dimensions, but the field adjustments are not instantaneous in both dimensions and are dependent on the thermodynamics of each dimension individually. The field and particle adjustments are order dependent. And, additionally, in our real space, they are also time-resultant. The key point of analysis is that the delay between the input of data and the thermodynamic system change is the reason we have a Gravitometric effect at the particles (proximal to the Brane itself). Each opening and closing of the Brane function produces a wave of quantum adjustments. The fields that adjust the fastest to respond are the ones physically closest (proximal) to the brane in reach dimension. I believe that is the tendency we observe for particles that are closest to each other, attract each other, and the fields become a higher uniformity (gravity)" Shreyak Chakraborty "Yes. I agree. This model isn’t very different from General Relativistic idea except the source of the waves. The gravitational waves r replaced by Fiber and brane functions June 6 at 12:30pm " Within the first week of June, the various approaches were building a coherent model based on the common elements find in them and other models. Shreyak June 7 at 8:35pm "WORK UPDATE- June 8th 2011 Using the equations for FaTe fiber constructs, it seems that the quarks around the fibers follow a different path or state near the fibers(they travel as quark currents as Charles A. Laster suggested). This though may not happen in very high energy fields i.e when fiber twisting is maximum and all particles are in closed loops. Though their properties remain same. Sincerely, Shreyak" At this time another model was found that had similarities with the model under development by the group. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626303.900 by Garrett Lisi. Mark "I did not realize how close to the track we were with Garrett Lisi. We have a different basic logic table and excellent string theory physics, but he is doing very well with his own theory. My compliments to him." June 8 things started coming together. Charles June 8 at 12:38am "Question, in string theory, how do we account for the fine-structure constant? Been trying to fit the fine-structure constant into my model. I expanded the paper on spin and charge, as I had to look into the g-factor, which made me look at the fin-structure constant, updated my note on spin and charge to reflect this. Can the point particle when modeled in string theory have finite size?" Shreyak "Fine-structure constant alpha=e^2/(h/2pi)c is a D1 structure. Therefore, it can be used with particle interactions of muons and electrons in any dimension. Yes the pt particle has a finite size. Well the fine structure constant isn’t a big problem. We just need to modify D11 field dynamics a little bit"

Charles "From that paper we can use QED to calculate the finite size of a particle." Shreyak "Hmmm. Yes. We surely can do that! I am working on the fine structure constant. Well, i am trying to enter the constant into higher dimensional field equations that govern particle interactions around fibers" Mark "I did want to give careful; consideration to you both before presenting the twist on the field from the singularity to the High Brane (quark) because I know you are both involved in the architecture of the fields above the quark as well. Th...e singularity is our constant. The dimension and orientation in 2D is where we start everything from. Your discussion of fine structure constant is dependent on how the fields curve and wrap around the singularity, but you can proceed as if the fields are equi-templar (time and space) The conditions of the fields are less twisted near 0 degrees K. and that is a special condition . I will make the first presentation of the subatomic structure based on minimum curvature, but , unless you have a special comment (and please do) What is in the design as curved space is a problem of translating dimensions but does not differentiate any new sub-domains, at least that is what I would tell you for your needs to make progress." Charles "Mark, I am working on the double solution problem with the electron on my Doc here. I am thinking of modeling the electron as harmonic oscillator where the finite particle is one half, and the extended scalar wave in 3-D the other half. As ...the extended wave approached max , the particle aspect goes to 0. When to point expands to the max given by the fine-structure constant in my paper, the extended wave is collapsing into the point particle, so the two created a 1/2 spin and switch roles for 1/2 spin particles. Hope that’s clear enough." Mark "very clear. wow I suppose it's up to me to define the architecture of the threshold. It will take some tome because no one else has baked that piece of cake." June 8 at 1:19am Charles updated paper on spin, charge, and the fine-structure constant. Spin, Charge and the Fine-Structure Constant June 8 at 8:33pm Charles related his model in his book of containment for quarks and the nucleus as it relates to the Golden FaTe string theory. Quark Confinement and the Nucleus Shreyak June 8 at 10:03pm "WORK UPDATE- June 9th,2011. I see a lot of coordination in the group work. I am leaving the quark model for Mark to complete as i am onto a different task. I am working on field equations and particle interactions using the Fine Structure Constant i.e simply elementary charge over Planck charge. This wont be a model. But i will describe it in text. Further, i wanna tell that the Quark Currents are working extremely well. Thanks, Shreyak" Shreyak June 8 at 10:43pm "The equation using the FSC that i call the Fine Field Equation(FFE) will contain the following:1. Elementary charge^2/Planck charge [available] 2. Schrödinger Singularity equation (modified) [available but with flaws for D>4 fields] 3. Equation of particle in D>4 [available] and 4. Harmonic oscillators" "Well this equation is like a puzzle! Hmmm. I think the FFE will be Schrodinger eq. =product of the FSC and the twisting index of the

fibers! It describes standing waves too using fiber functions(TWISTING INDEX IS A FIBER FUNCTION)" Shreyak June 8 at 11:10pm "FFE LOGIC We can use a very simple logic to reach the FFE(Fine Field Equation) involving Fine-structural constant. We know that the particle interactions for a given fiber field varies directly to the fiber twisting (Twisting index). Let FSC =æ Then we use Schrodinger equation to define particle interactions. Let particle interaction=pR and Twisting Index=Tw. Then, pR=æ(Tw) Shreyak" Shreyak working on the same problem, solved it in terms of Golden FaTe. Both results matched when compared with the model Charles had, so the solution would work for other fields of physics. The string theory itself was created from two directions, the small scale and the large, at the same time, and the two adjusted to match by Shreyak and Mark. Mark June 9 at 1:02pm 6-9-2011 "Core Concept Statement : String Theory Development Project. We have built a very fine model from two different directions. From the singularity Brane up to the quark (High Brane ) and also provided a basis for modeling wave and particle behavior based on those principles above the Quark level. All of the smaller components of the project are described in the Docs and artwork, plus some comments. Now comes the toughest part of the project.....Integrating the data from a string source (with source code) into the functionality and topography of wave fields. Part of the translational processing comes from the symmetry of the High Brane and its geometry. Other researchers and artists have built wonderful conceptual designs and animations to show that the property’s above the quark result from this mathematical field particle. You might think, oh, that's the difficult part! The truth is, that is not the most difficult challenge. So how does one prepare for a new concept to present to the group, as it is one of the last necessary bridges in the model? First it is to describe the process you wish to accomplish. We must demonstrate how the low Brane string fibers " Interlace" with the Primary Field in the subatomic atom. This is to say, how does the data actually become "read" and transcribed into field effects. It is easier to conceive the next part of the process, above the Quark (H. Brane) where component waves recombine and change tensor quality’s and act as a wave-table, giving rise to geometry’s of super-atomic domain. I am not saying there isn't great achievement in those beautiful models, I am just saying there is clearly more work to be done using the same type of models. I am saying that the real key to finishing this Grand Unification is translating the string data to waves , a process known as "Interlacing". It will require thermodynamic models to demonstrate the mechanism. We will outline the quality’s of the strings we chose, and the different Primes of strings (which do spacial computation, but also, a new conceptualization must be developed for the Interlacing of the Fibers to the fields. This key concept will help even the best in the group to connect the whole Theory together and make it useful. Intuitively, we already know there is a solution. What is necessary is to show the solution. To complete the thoughts: The range of fields above the quark are better understood and mapped already in particle physics. The theory need only explain why the component periodicity (order/complexity/ bonding and molecular orbital property’s) of the elements performs in the way it does. The string theory atomic model will be able to make new predictions, as a superior model. Because so much effort and information has been placed on superatomic research, I think our group would be most satisfied in achieving the sub-atomic modeling, and that would certainly be our important first step, a step no one else has satisfactorily achieved. Best Regards, Mark"

Shreyak June 10 at 4:19am "TEMPORARY SOLUTION TO QUARK PROBLEMA few minutes ago, while testing particle field models on my computer, i found that quarks behave a little differently under high fields where other particles are indistinguishable. Now, we consider quarks to move and join freely across hyperspace grids. This helps to create field pattern like Mark's. When we do so, some fields that cant be renormalized act as quark currents around fibers at the grid boundary. This will predict present observations of proton formation by quarks anywhere as we observe. Thanks, Shreyak." Mark "I appreciate your prudent comments. I was considering the problem and the present Wave Table Theory suggests the Proton as a quark pair also, the only juxta-positional change that makes any logical sense to me, that would change internal field causality, is the rotational alignment of the quarks, (they are matched planarly), which would create an external positive charge relative to each other. That would be the counter field to an electron discharge to the external field. That would change the internal interlace significantly more than the outer one, but definitely move more positive charge to the peripheral fields....could it be that relatively simple?" Mark June 10 at 1:55pm "Theoretical representation of sealed quark pair, also known as Neutronium6. The usefulness of this post is to distinguish it's field effects which are self contained and fractal -locked (center construct) from the quark pair I illustrate later that is "Open High Field" design."

Shreyak June 11 at 1:14am "MAIN MILESTONES IN MATHEMATICS OF FaTe FIELD THEORY 1. Field eq. 1 i.e the equation for Fiber Field 2. Field eq. 2 i.e the equation for Particle field 3. Equations for Symmetric and Anti-symmetric fields 4. Field eq. 3 i.e the Fine Field Equation for particle interactions which is invariant in any D=7 Sincerely, Shreyak" "This is it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My simulation of FaTe universe. Zoom in and explore."

Mark June 11 at 1:50am "6-11-2011 singularity mapped to Mesh 2 for quantized string mesh"

Shreyak June 13 at 1:15am "DYNAMICS IN THE GRID June 13th,2011 I already have described quarks in the grid in previous post. Neutrons and Protons are bound states of quarks. We must include both QUARKS AND ANTI QUARKS to describe FaTe experimentally using QCD. When this is done, we induce Corner Fields just around the grid(see simulation). This enables formation of particles freely in the grid and our model for universe is nearly complete." Charles back in a post on June 8 at 12:38am described how a double solution for quarks would work to Mark. It addressed not just quarks, but all 1/2 spin particles. A single wave solution had been used in his prior work on 1/2 spin, and needed modification. But progress based on the idea seemed to be working well and the first Octonion based double solution model was posted. Mark June 13 at 9:24pm "Improved FanoMnemonic for Tensor related analysis of Quark Property’s. 3D version next (for quark pairs). I will post values for single quark as a test of this construct. It will show how quark spins are determined in a bi-directional wave system. For 5,6,7, there are two vectors going to each node and one vector returned as a resultant." "Posting the solution I got in just a moment. Let me know what you think. There are two spins for the divergent field initialization at each quark emission at the low field. Thanks Charles A Laster" "The single quark post is made, with the spacial spin calculations. The inner field/low field relationship is a possible contender for the gravitometric effect. The neutron and proton, which both have quark pairs, will exhibit different gravitometric attractors and also different stoichiometry with respect to the Inner fields. The balance between EM effects on the Outer Fields, and the Gravitometric effects from the Inner fields to the singularity, will no doubt effect the geometry of the subatomic nucleus as more protons and neutrons are placed into the model." June 13 at 10:27pm Mark posts the first quark model with a double solution. This was based on the standard electron equation with time included in the equation, and a anti-particle is a normal particle going backwards in time.

Mark "SINGLE QUARK data bit table for bidirectional input into quark fields, plus resultant spin pairs shown and also return vector of inverted spin to complete the symmetry. The return spin must

match the low field and stabilize the containment field. Also indicated is the tachyon ring mated to the order of bytes in the string. The key to this model is in the order and it's reversal on the other side of the singularity. It places the reverse calculation for the anti-quark, symmetrically on the other side of the base 3 Inner Fields. Together , the 12 spin values provide the 6 High Field Domains on the outer shell of the neutron with a specific pattern of spins that is lowest entropy for the fields. I will also make a map of that, and then proceed to the Proton, which is , of course, a different symmetry and field set." Shreyak June 14 at 11:40pm Here is another Quark Field Simulation that is very similar to the set of latest models posted by Mark Aaron Simpson. U can see the quark-antiquark pair in the figure as small circles in yellow(one yellow and the other should be anti-yellow). The pink curves represent a Chromo-electric field between them which is very important for experimental support through QCD for our models of quark fields. The green zigzag lining is an induced corner field across the grid.

Shreyak June 16 at 5:14am "MAJOR DEVELOPMENT June 13th, 2011 When one uses particles as fiber functions and force fields as string functions, one can derive field equations of general relativity from oscillating string equations. I am going to post a detailed explanation very soon" Charles June 16 at 12:29am The Electron a Double Solution for 1/2 spin particles was posted for the group. The paper examined a 4 vector Clifford Algebra approach to the Dirac equation used here http://www.scribd.com/doc/57249529/Dirac-Eqn-Easiest-Form . This was easy to convert to the Octonion vector model in higher dimensions in string theory, each of the 3-D vectors on the semiclassical model being the result of two vectors from another dimension. This paper showed something important that the Golden FaTe model suggested, the Dirac equation can be treated with time included in the equation, which is what makes a positron an electron going back in time. Or it it can be examined as vectors which can be solved for any given moment in time. Mark "From WIKI and right on target..... Time reversal of the known dynamical laws. Particle physics codified the basic laws of dynamics into the standard model. This is formulated as a quantum field theory that has CPT symmetry, i.e., the laws are invariant under simultaneous operation of time reversal, parity and charge conjugation. However, time reversal itself is seen not to be a symmetry (this is usually called CP violation). There are two possible origins of this asymmetry, one through the mixing of different flavors of quarks in their weak decays, the second through a direct CP violation in strong interactions. The first is seen in experiments, the second is strongly constrained by the non-observation of the EDM of a neutron. It is important to stress that this time reversal violation is unrelated to the second law of thermodynamics, because due to the conservation of the CPT symmetry, the effect of time reversal is to rename particles as antiparticles and vice verse. Thus the second law of thermodynamics is thought to originate in the initial conditions in the universe."

This meant that both approaches had to be examined. If time reversal could be removed, the CP violation would be solved in the model. So it was decided to use the twist in a string, a vector, and run the model again. Shreyak June 17 at 2:39am "EXPLANATION June 17, 2011 I now am posting the explanation of particle interaction and formation in D>4. In the grids, particles exist as fiber functions i.e these functions are just a way to express particles that form from the fundamental fibers. We can similarly express force carries as string functions in the grid. This may look incorrect, but we can derive almost all equations of General Relativity an Quantum Mechanics using oscillating string equations for D>4 along with a Constructive Interference Condition that control field emission. Thanks, Shreyak" Shreyak June 17 at 4:14am "After i read the discussion between Bob and Evelyn, i want to point out its implications to the group. The Grid constructs existing in D=11 space-time behave very much like the surface of water with particles on it. The grid surface allows ripple formation as a combined, large fiber wave. The equations that i am working should be similar to those suggested by Evelyn. With best regards to the group members, Shreyak." The first full quark model was posted for the classical Dirac equation with time. June 17 at 7:29pm Mark "This is the "empty template for calculating all possible field values for the quark-antiquark pair" take some time to familiarize yourself with the details of the representation. This is the 26 iteration of this design and has the best clarity. It will be paired with a 3 dimensional field representation for transferring the calculated... values to spacial coordinates for up-mapping. This will help by-pass many tedious integrations and prevent dimensional confusion. I have named the Tachyon function integration from Strings as " Transduction " (translation and conduction). I hope the terminology is acceptable as a definition"

This was an excellent quark model, but the other method needed to be tried. Shreyak June 18 at 7:24am Here is a news i would like to share, Bob Turner just told me the possibility of a negative refractive index. I just found out that this indeed works brilliantly between grids and free spaces. The grids can boost particles to Tachyonic velocities when the particles pass thru the grid. The Reverse Spiralization is yet not clear but these tachyons can be observed as zigzag lining(see my first Auto CAD simulation). Mark June 18 at 12:40am "6-18-2011 Thought For the day.....referring to the quark-pair chart.....the concept that is most likely to strike my friends in group is something I should have made obvious in the

description. It is highly likely that the difference between the proton and Neutron is keyed into these 6 different conformational quark pairs. The field descriptors may polarize the fields to different spin potentials and , of course, have inertial and path consequences. It is also likely that these are extended to attractor consequences. (The singularity in 2 states). Keep an open mind as to the potential of using these when we map to High Field theory" Shreyak June 18 at 12:20am "C, P AND T SYMMETRY IN FaTe June 18th,2011 We know that in general, laws of physics do not obey T symmetry i.e the universe would behave differently if only time was reversed. Mark has already explained C and P symmetries, so I’ll proceed. The FaTe along with QM and GR obey combined CPT symmetry. To reverse time in D=11 universe, we must reverse the spiral direction. An important fact is that in FaTe, all established theories are kept in their exact form but we slightly modify them when we consider D=11 open space. Weak force gives C violation and obeys CP but the combined D=11 geometry obeys C as well as P independently. With best regards, Shreyak" Mark "I understand the problem. You will not have to worry about C violation. We will redefine D=11, but first as a closed space (not a naked singularity. Remember the comment about 5 days ago. The Janus coin? There are 2 conditions on D=11. We only have to define the 2 states for D=11. They are not simultaneous and there are no violations. The Brane is open and then it is closed (to external environmental data). Right now we only have to define closed. We must not forget that "open" may be the key to attractor !! So the relativistic problem will help us model the attractor !!!!" Mark June 18 at 1:10pm "6-18-2011 Model Development Methodology: comments on nomenclature. Most of this group is composed of advanced problem solvers and other intuitive individuals. The analogy of climbing a ladder applies to the example I wish to use. Most of us solve normal problems rapidly because we know which logic ladders to climb, when to reach across to switch to a better ladder, and then which rungs to grab and which are slippery or unreliable. The ladders are there to help us reach a goal. Some of these steps which are reliable already have names and are tested by others, ensuring moderately good success. I normally would not fault productive logic to step onto a tested path. In comparison, the great minds always seem to go more slowly. That is because they must rename each rung of the ladder by it's exact description, and decide on a less traveled path if it follows the logic. It takes self control, wisdom, and teamwork, to not rush ahead and grab a rung that is already named and tested. There is no difficulty to the Group, discussing each ladder and the options, but using a known ladder or step may prevent a new emergent path from developing. Those of you who read the diagrams I post have noticed I did not try to assign spin to the quark models. I called the values "Field Descriptors". That is because that is what the very best problem solvers would do. As it turns out, the complete model requires Field Descriptors and Wave-Particle Descriptors to first be modeled separately and theoretically, and then combine and sort out the math of Unity. The total model function is a combination of these and we lose some information when we compress to the final descriptor set. Same with an established ladder step;it is predefined and possibly limiting to use!! Without the roots of separate function sets, we may lose our logic path for the next rung on the ladder! Change the topic to the Quark Attractor. I have called it such, and not the Gluon, for the same reasons. Some have leaped to the other ladder, and bypassed the fundamental concept of taking each step. I have no idea if we will spend unnecessary time to define our own steps, but I will continue to model "The attractor" until I discover whether it is same as Gluon in definition. This is the logic of great success. I admire the energy of the group to push ahead on the topic, however I remind you that others have also, and they got stuck with no more steps or ladder. It is likely that is due to a loss of the logic path which was unique to their climb. Try to write comments in the context to compare

to models, so actual research is done. Compare to the model, and we will incorporate after the group has thoroughly reported as comments." Mark June 18 at 7:28pm "6-18-2011 Review of Alexander Friedman reference material. I had no idea that the data for the strings was going to compliment the Ricci Curvature scalar formulas. I do not design by predisposition to established math. I was simply following the path I previously described, which is "what would be the best way to design Matter". I copied this from Shyam Iyengar reference to Alexander Friedman: k = +1, 0 or -1 depending on whether the shape of the universe is a closed 3-sphere, flat (i.e. Euclidean space) or an open 3-hyperboloid, respectively.[3] If k = +1, then a is the radius of curvature of the universe. If k = 0, then a may be fixed to any arbitrary positive number at one particular time. If k = -1, then (loosely speaking) one can say that i·a is the radius of curvature of the universe. a is the scale factor which is taken to be 1 at the present time. k is the spatial curvature when a = 1 (i.e. today). If the shape of the universe is hyper-spherical and Rt is the radius of curvature (R0 in the present-day), then a = Rt / R0. If k is positive, then the universe is hyper-spherical. If k is zero, then the universe is flat. If k is negative, then the universe is hyperbolic. What this excellent reference tells me is that "Field descriptors" nomenclature was a more accurate name than naming the resultants of the quark fields as spin. For this I am grateful, because the Friedman work has incredible intuition relating and mapping field topography. If these are, indeed, natural functions of field then the data directly implies that the quark fields modulate by frequency between these 3 different states of curvature, and potentially, can apply all 3 field types as an generator in the same Domain of space, and as an oscillator around the periphery of the quark-pair construct. This is a fabulous possibility and potential. It also compliments what we were theorizing about the quantum states of the quark pair conformational positions. At the very least it is an ideal data translation and application that follows the uncertainty principle to the letter." Shreyak June 19 at 1:26am "The answer to Kasule's question is simpler than i thought According to QCD, quarks have 3 colors and 6 flavors(up,down,top,bottom,strange and charmed). In QCD, a neutral particle has white color(color is just a view. No real color exists in quarks). This whited color i.e neutron therefore must comprise of RGB combination i.e 3 quarks are must. When u add the quark charges, u get neutral particle. I will explain all this in detail later today." Shreyak June 19 at 10:05am "WORK UPDATE June 19th, 2011 I am working on the total description of a fiber grid. The grid can many a times be regarded as the total fiber flux through a given D>4 space. On integration, we find the fiber flux bounded between two corner fields(Cf1 and Cf2). This is the essence of the low and high fields that Mark brilliantly predicted! Thanks, Shreyak" By the 19th of June, Mark had made the changes to the quark model and the new one based on the direction of a twist in the string was ready. Mark June 19 at 10:34am "The new quark pair diagram has improved visibility of the singularity and strings which are the quark-node modifiers for each specific charge. This charge will be placed directly in the low field, which defines the grid transition. The high fields are clearly mapped and coded, and more importantly, the interlacing of the high fields matches the field diagrams where we modeled the metric and magnetic fields together originally . So far we have modeled 6 different types of fields. The new quark-pair diagram has a bonus of modeling the charge effects around the super gravitometric

toroid around the singularity grid. I like the better visibility of the singlet quark charge vectors near the super-gravity ring and the proximal interlacing view I now have for that region of the diagram. It may show how the super-gravity ring twists around its toroidal surface, driven by the quark charges, which completes the dynamic of the model (the last field to be discovered). It may show a relationship between gravity and a new type of super-magnetic toroidal field (another discovery? what else !) I think that view will also help us predict , in part, the stability (entropy) of the different conformations and know the underlying causes. I will have the diagram posted in a couple hours from now." "I can now safely say that Protons and Neutrons are not spheres (LOL)" "I think I now understand why a collapsed star forms a black hole, and what the event horizon of the black hole is actually composed of. There is one conformation of the 6 , when you see it, you will probably get the same thought. This model just keeps stimulating more applications to space-time anomaly’s." Shreyak "Too good Mark. Everything is becoming clear now. I can see the path to unification clear in front of us. The only thing to do now is insert the right pieces at the right places. The amalgamation of Fiber Fluxes and low and high fields turn out to be superb!!" Charles "The work on the other model shows why the standard model has worked so well, despite being complex and abstract, it gives good results even in our model. It is always good to show why some other model worked so well. It lends support to your model, and lessens opposition from proponents of the other model." Mark June 19 at 2:39pm "6-19-2011 Aarongrams: We have defined the 6 stable conformations of leptons that give rise to the quark-lepton-singularity manifold, if we borrow from classical physics, using the term lepton. If we don't borrow from classical, then we have the specific sub-particles of quarks, which I would like to name the "Aaron" (pronounced A-ron...), assembled into Aarongrams. This is then the Aaron Spacial Field Construct. I am placing credit to the 2 main collaborators on the copyrighted publication of the art. Shreyak Chakraborty and Charles A Laster are the two major cocontributors to the development of the project." "Special logistics note: flipping the back Aaron causes the direction of the data order for that tachyon ring transduction to reverse, which changes the vectored direction of the unbalanced low field, for example: from normal(+1/2 to -1/2) becomes (-1/2 to +1/2) in order rotating around Domain. For +1/2 +1/2 it is inconsequential. Same for -1/2 -1/2 "

Mark June 19 at 6:46pm "Posting in series 2 more views. This is advanced Low Field View 1. Later Low Field View 2. This is in preparation for presenting the High Fields, where the Low View will be Masked Over. The Outlines of The Torus Fields are more evident in this view, showing the Particle Bag or Confinement Symmetry."

Mark June 19 at 7:27pm "Advanced Low Field View 2 "Turning The Sphere Inside-Out. I believe this Field Inversion represents the Fundamental Basis for gravitometric effect. It provides a projection of a singularity modulated field horizon."

Mark "I am now starting to "read" the diagrams as they present themselves. AG#5 is likely the supersymmetry for a photon ejection, or something other than an electron yet to be named. If you compare the field descriptors to the low field vectors,... some are outward , and in some cases downward (about 50/50) . AG #5 the interlace centered red -1 has emergent 0 paired modulators. It is opposite a blue +1 with -1 down vectors. There is no other low field of -1/+1 axial symmetry that has a sub vectoring with a pair of emergent 0 pair quark vectors. The other -1 low fields are asymmetrically vectored. This design is getting more interesting, the more information I interpolate, the more I like it." Mark June 20 at 11:04am "6-20-2011 Group Orientation : The significance of what we are describing in the model for the Quark-Lepton-Singularity needs to be stated. Especially for those that have followed classic models of the atom. In the search for the "center" of the atom, one might end up imagining that you continue to break particles and waves down , infinitely to smaller and smaller pieces. What we have shown, and thus created excitement about, is showed that the functions within the Neutron and Proton are calculated from the most basic fundamental forces, and therefor we need not go any further into dissecting them. All we need to do is describe them and their interconnected behavior and propertys. The Proton and Neutron are self contained packages of all the fundamental functions that the Universe itself was formed from, and the spacial wave relationships take the internalized waves and redistribute them on the surface, and they can be mapped. This allows us to place more conventional fields of magnetic and quantized photonic fields in the next region of space around the particles. The attractor function (to build a complex nucleus) will define the complexity and order of the higher fields, step for step. When the fields and particles bond with other atoms, there will be cases where the protons and neutrons internally recalculate their spacial relationship to balance the forces outside the high fields for ionic and covalent bonds." "I am leaving some of the String Theory (as far as how to model the higher fields) to Shreyak Chakraborty, because I have to focus on the kinetic models and defining the photon particles and electron. It will be an incredible challenge because I will face more criticism on this than on any other topic (as Kasule Francis hinted, the particles are like chameleons). So, if I claim to have the best model for those, it is going to be highly challenged. I am expecting a lot of Shreyak, in his work, but I am not

demanding it. He has a job and other responsibility. I expect others to help him, or, I will need to spend some time on the models with him. Either way, it is his decision what is prudent." Mark June 20 at 11:37am "6-20-2011 Personal Orientation, with respect to particle designs; I have learned that the key to modeling the Atom was to follow this Emergent Philosophy of design. I selected the fundamental aspects of both String Theory and Numerology to plan an evolving set of constructs to describe the various balances of observable known principles and performances in the physical world. It has worked out quite well. The challenge of describing the particles (photons, electrons etc) will likely be taken under the same terms. If I begin first to model them in the hyperspace of the Hadrons, I will not have a classical model, at first, but I will have the advantage of not only theorizing the correct property’s and waveforms, but I will also have the extra benefit of understanding the relationship to the different fields as the particles are emerged from that. If I try to start with the theory of free particles, I will have no basis for knowing what pieces of the hyperspace property’s that are intrinsic ( or trapped) within the emerged particles. To put it clearly....the photon is not the same wave within hyperspace as it is in normal space. I was already certain the electron was not, because the EM fields dictate unusual conformity within the leptons, that interlaces high density packets of charge, resulting in magnetic fields of unusual order. The question that first occurs to any physicist is...is he saying that within the Hadrons the photon is entangled by these types of magnetic forces? All I am saying at this time is it is possible. And because of that I think my model of the photon will be better constructed if I leave that option available, until disproved. The other relationship, which we have not debated, is whether the tachyon fibers around the singularity are strings, or fibers, or whether they are simply metric fields in space that radiate from the singularity. It is not impossible to have two types of strings involved in the model, as I have drawn it that way. Shreyak has indicated he does not consider them to be string pair fibers, as I have called them. The subject needs to be clarified and is open for debate, or improved definition. We can take this on a new commentary, but it needs definition. I suppose that a few friends will be anxious to see me combine the aarongrams to make new constructs. It is tempting. I will spend some of my time playing with the two different possibility’s for combining them. One will involve temporal tubules, which are also string related theory. These are an extension of tachyons and complex strings, that synchronize the nucleus to itself. The other aspect of organization is the field descriptors, which eventually mediate spin. Notice I said they mediate (and not define) spin. We may find that spin is not exactly consummated in the way we have simplified it in the past. It seems as soon as you place numbers into fields...everyone sees spin !. Field descriptors are partial functions of the fields. What they indicate has to be extracted from the field function itself. And that goes back to why I have to model the emergent particles to be able to specify what the numbers mean!!" Mark June 20 at 10:34pm "6-20-2011 First experiment using the Quark-Lepton-Singularity Manifold. This diagram illustrates the 3 Dimensional representation of 5 Dimensional space relating to the strong and weak forces of Nucleonic space. In this experiment we assume the hyper-magnetic fields dominate the forces which align and coordinate the conformity of nuclei with multiple protons. Other Theoretical maps will be provided that align other fields. In some cases, like this, more than one field type benefits from the "test" conformation. It is possible that many different field manipulations are possible, and these experiments are to outline the most probable , based on fields. This is the best way to get experience with the new models and get some experience with the theory as it will pertain to particle formation. Forgot to specify...the Hyper-magnetic fields are shown in Dark Blue. The Toroidal magnetic Low fields are in Grey color."

Mark June 20 at 11:58pm "Second experiment using the Quark-Lepton-Singularity Manifold. This diagram illustrates the 3 Dimensional representation of 5 Dimensional space relating to the strong and weak forces of Quark Dominated space. In this experiment we assume the photon fields dominate the forces which align and coordinate the conformity of nuclei with multiple protons. Consequently, there is a hyper-magnetic super-ring (in dark blue) as well, in this conformation. Our theory on the basic quark includes the potential to curve and slow the speed of light throughout the photon tubes. In a super-ring conformation it may be conditional that the entire matrix can absorb light, convert photons to electrons (quenching modulation effect), and then produce a super-magnetic field as a result; making it a candidate for Dark Matter and Energy model. This is probably the mechanism of Cold Fusion, which is a highly disputed phenomena. Now, at least , there is a basis for investigating the possibility it can actually occur. This is the first instance I have seen of a reasonable theory for Dark Matter and Energy, based on principles we have been routinely working with. Yes, I am theorizing that Dark Energy and Matter is a Cold Fusion Process. Other Theoretical maps will be provided that align other fields. In some cases, like this, more than one field type benefits from the "test" conformation. It is possible that many different field manipulations are possible, and these experiments are to outline the most probable , based on fields. This is the best way to get experience with the new models and get some experience with the theory as it will pertain to particle formation."

Mark June 20 at 12:27pm "6-20-2011 Field Descriptors......Field Modulators....The String Values from the singularity are presented to the Tachyon field. Their specific vibrations are numerically represented by the values 1/-1/0 in that specific order. A temporal carrier vibration is produced from the stringtachyon entanglement that gains to EM as it crosses the hyper-magnetic field ring around the singularity. This is now a pulse modulated frequency that can excite the photons (special hyper photons) to circulate through the containment fields (leptons) in a concerted order and quantized pattern. Due to the temporal effects of hyperspace photons, the behavior within the leptons is such that an acceleration to the end-lobes creates a secondary pulse upon encountering the low fields (grid in string theory). It is at this grid that the spacial field descriptors values are imprinted to the mesh as valuation. This , in turn, also defines the wave-particle potential on that grid. For now, the values of 1/1/0 are considered the field modulators. The interlacing of the low fields at the grid is the key to any

spin inferences. It follows that, when a field is +1 it is an emerging torus and the rotational vector on the inside of the torus is outward, and consequently the outside surface of the field recycles down. the 1/2 rotators values show the top values on the exterior of each side of the torus. For -1 it is the opposite case, and a descending vector is present in the inside of the torus. The tricky concept is the 0 field modulator. It is the hyper-torus . It carry’s the potential for both directions simultaneously. This case of duality is supported by the underlying axial symmetry quark. This allows dual dimensionality for that specific torus. For model simplification, I always placed a -1/2 and a +1/2 , and always maintain the same order clockwise in the model. The deeper implications of how that provides particle behavior to the high fields is dependent on the specific variance of the frequency of the low field modulators. The first row shows that probabilistically, 2/3 of the modulated interval the field modulators are a set {+1/+1/0/0/-1/-1} and 1/3 of the MI they are {0/0/0/0/0/0}. This is the underlying ratio of total charge for the quark function, based on the modulators. I hope that is enough to get Charles A Laster spinning again. The smae will apply when I start combing the Hadrons, only the tables will change with the nullification of self terminating nucleonic bonds." Mark "first row is AG#1 ...AG#2...AG#3 together represent the fractional 1/3 charge distribution from the quantized string values +1/-1/0. AG#4-6 are similar but thye data order is reflective string packet for either side of hadron." Shreyak "I have also let plus n and -n for the field modulators in my paper that i will publish tomorrow" Charles "The first row shows that probabilistically, 2/3 of the modulated interval the field modulators are a set {+1/+1/0/0/-1/-1} and 1/3 of the MI they are {0/0/0/0/0/0}. This is the underlying ratio of total charge for the quark function, based on the modulators."Would the same modulation effect be applied to explain the fractional charge of quarks as compared to the electron charge?" Mark "Yes, I think I was trying to convey the bridge between the charts as probability models/assuming each conformation was 1/6 of potential combinations. There may be other unstable cases, which would increase the base number. Stability is based ...on degrees of symmetry. AG#5 is the most unbalanced super-symmetrical form I presented. The point was I was considering the comparison to accepted quark-charge tables like Gell-Mann mathematics. I think Gell Mann misses the true nature of the quark variety’s. As I am examining the model, it would appear that there are symmetry "seals" placed on certain low fields that denote the lower orbitals. I will chart this tonight." Shreyak June 21 at 12:55am "«starry» This is my research paper!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 The work of this group!!!!!!!!!!!11" FaTe model of hyperspace Mark June 21 at 2:01pm "6-20-2011.....if anyone has tried to count....there are 18 open particle portals around grid above low field, model two QLS manifold, for 18 electrons to the High field. Exactly the number in Palladium outer shells." "based on electron shell , we can map the 4 quantum states of the leptons !! " Mark June 21 at 9:56pm "6-21-2011 Attractor Model #3, using AG#1 Neutron related Quark Lepton Singularity Manifold. This diagram is unique to the first two. In this format, for neutrons, the theoretical alignment is hypercubic. It allows for direct singularity interfacing. It also represents the Neutronic format of Carbon 12. Only in this case, we used 12 Neutrons to represent the Matrix. Why? Because, when the electrons are released form the outside Neutrons, the Conformation and wavelength (distance to the singularity (periodicity) will change to the length for Protons. That is the theory as it is developing. It will then look like the Palladium wavelength for singularity periodicity. That, in turn, also changes the remaining potential for the low fields surrounding the construct. That provides the orbital shell behavior and calculation."

Shreyak June 21 at 10:39pm "COLD FUSION IN FaTe I shall here giv u a purely theoretical approach to cold fusion in hyperspace. I hav come to know abt the importance of cold fusion in our models. I did give a sign of this in my paper but didnt realise its importance. What i think is that the LCF manifold is the home to Cold Fusion. We can achieve such temperatures(normal) at low fields and this can easily lead to protonproton fusion at low temperature and result in neutrons. I want to notify that the LCF IS BETTERLY CONNECTED TO THE GRID and so this fusion's results will be seen in grid. Shreyak" Shreyak June 21 at 10:41pm "I am going to read my paper at a seminar(due to a gr8 response on the group work!)" Mark June 21 at 11:43pm "6-22-2011 Attractor Model #4, using AG#1 Neutron related Quark Lepton Singularity Manifold. This diagram is unique to the first three. It represents Diatomic Oxygen (O2) .In this format, for neutrons, the theoretical alignment is poly-triads. It allows for direct bond interfacing. It also represents the Neutronic format of Oxygen 16. Only in this case, we used 16 Neutrons to represent the Matrix. The Conformation and wavelength (distance to the singularity (periodicity) have been changed to the length for Protons. That is the theory as it is developing. The double bond allows for an extended hyper ring through the two atoms , at states of low free energy. That, in turn, also changes the remaining potential for the low fields surrounding the construct. That provides the orbital shell behavior and calculation."

Mark June 22 at 7:23pm "6-22-2011 I am working on a better model for the Di-atomic Oxygen molecule. I am following intuition, and a knowledge of how oxygen performs and interacts with other moeitys in nature. The strange part of this experience, and it has already occurred with the other models, is that I only need half as many protons and neutrons as the atomic numbers call for (in totals). For Palladium is was only a fraction to get the essential symmetry. My first thought is ....maybe you aren't extrapolating the forms into enough dimensions. Perhaps it is actually two layers on top of each other? I would say no, because all of the electrons and bonding already adds up! For Oxygen (O2) , I can already visualize H2O2 , where 2 additional protons can be added for perfect form.......so something really funny, and exciting , is going on here. For the smaller elements, the Atomic number

seems correct. I will have to make the smaller elements to get the answer. I also wanted to get to where I can model H2O, so I will make a choice on which is next. Using the quantum spacial calculator is one of the most interesting experiments I have ever participated in. WOW" Mark June 22 at 9:43pm "Model #5 , A more complete and accurate model for Di-Atomic Oxygen {O2}. Design is composed of 2 covalently bonded oxygen atoms. The symmetry of each individual atom is not as perfect as I first considered. There are 4 protons and 4 neutrons, but they are not placed in parallel symmetry’s. Also, in each atom, there is a pinch at the middle, where the quarks are spaced slightly closer to the center, which creates a bias. The bias occurs after the double bond forms, so atomic Oxygen single atom has higher symmetry !! If viewed from the edge of the drawing the two atoms do not sit in a planar field, because the bond in the middle is at the angle of declination of the quarks in the 2 center neutrons. The atoms tilt up from the page at the top and bottom. From actual oxygen bond angles we now know the quark angles as well. This will help understand the H2O model when it is made. The angle is roughly 104.5 degrees. That means it tilts above plane roughly 53 degrees, and then back down 53 degrees , through individual atom lepton lattices. Using Angstrom units one can calculate the size of the rest of the constructs in A.U.s . Then we can scale the model for accuracy"

Shreyak June 22 at 9:43pm "ATOMIC MAPPING ONTO A GRID. June 23rd,2011 I shall now describe a FaTe technique to produce the atomic number of atoms in Periodic Table. All the posts of atoms by Paul and Mark can be described on a grid(confined) of fibers. This helps in producing the atomic number correctly, like for Hydrogen, Z=1 . We explain this by saying that 3 quarks and 1electron string is emitted by fibers. The protons and quarks can join by gluon's that quarks emit and we take them as function of quark oscillation. I am on to finding a relation to calculate atomic number for all elements using fibers." Mark June 22 at 12:28pm "6-22-2011 Group Orientation. 1. Charles A Laster has volunteered his time to take the posts on record and assemble them to a beginners introduction to the theory we have posted. I cannot thank him enough. 2. Shreyak is catching up with all the posts from while he was at seminars. He also finished a complete abstract on the String Theory he has participated in developing in group. He has made a short concise publication that explains where we are at. He is also trying to take on the new concept, Cold Fusion" and determine why I brought this concept into the group. I will continue to add the logic as we proceed. #3. on matters I have been posting, I did not want group to think I am taking on extremes with theory, just for the sake of it. I have posed a new question, on Mass because we may consider the very basic definitions as we make use of the models. Actually I miss-posted because a number with both real and imaginary components is a Complex Number. The post was to teach and awaken the mind as to what mass actually is,as a concept and not the convenient images we accept as we do standard chemistry.

The other extreme I have employed, to those watching the details, is I have been recombining the quantum maps, without adding the higher electron orbitals. I have been placing them proximal to simulate Nuclei boson bonding, and also show atomic bonds. I wanted to assure group members I am aware that the atom is considered to be mostly space, and that electron orbitals are considered to fill that space and comprise 99 % of the space. The nucleus is considered to comprise only a tiny amount of the spaces. For that I will explain that the quantum model serves a purpose not based on real space, but on dependent space and comparable field ratios (wavelengths). By experimenting on the maps without placing orbitals, I can compare relative domains and wavelengths obtained by recombining at different singularity distances. The wavelength of quanta is determined by the "real distance" from the tachyon ring to the low field apex. If the maps are aligned so that the apex of one map terminates at the tachyon ring of another, they are adjusted for wavelength (max wavelength). If they are aligned apex to apex, then the effective wavelength is 2x, and more importantly, they are out-of-phase couplings. If they are aligned singularity to apex, that defines photon max wavelengths (more about this later). That then effects the wave pattern throughout, as each wave type is circulated and intermixed. So please continue to allow the experiments with mapping, understanding that I do not expect friends to believe there are no orbitals. It is just that it is actually quite accurate to compare functional potential in this manner. And it has bore much fruits from these trials already." Shreyak June 23 at 1:58am "GENERAL RELATION FOR ATOMS(obvious, elementary relation) In this equation, i have not let strains on bond fibers. For an atom, the number of fibers required is Fs= 3(Z +N) + Ee where, Ee is no. Of electrons. Conversely if we can get "Fs" fibers, we can create properties of that atom." Mark June 23 at 9:52am "6-23-2011 Legacy Problems and Quark Nomenclature. : I have been trying to produce the maps with some simple atomic structures, to gauge their performance. It is going quite well. The problem I am having is with trying to cross over the AG maps with Protons and Neutrons, because the descriptions of Ps and Ns are so difficult and subjective. For awhile I found it convenient to call AG#1 a Neutron (based on the 0's around it) and I have used AG#2 to symbolize P's . It doesn't matter if they are perfectly right, after all, there is no instruction manual and I am best suited to figure out what makes logical sense. From what I am gathering about the real performance of protons and Neutrons, the Aaron grams chart has better cross-over definition now. The first row is probably all Protons. These are all super-symmetrically stable in quark-space (hyper-spacial boson-mediated calculations). The second row is likely to represent intermediate and full Neutronic states of the same Protons after changes in hyperspace related to internalization of particles to waves. Some will find that obvious. What is most interesting is that AG#5 is going to find itself modeled like no other of the AGs. I will save that for later today, if I am up and working. I had invited Stephen Hawking to take a shot with the model, but I think I will go ahead and provide the basis for my offer in more detail. I have provided enough atoms to get others started on analyzing the utility of the models . Bob Turner certainly grasped the fine structure best fit after I posted on the wavelength and AUs. . Everyone else seems to understand that I am trying to fulfill different aspects, as to cover how the applications of the QSC can be used, with a few examples each time. It appears the idea has caught on and friends understand how it can be used." Mark June 23 at 11:17am "6-22-2011 This is the 6th Model Produced. I think I am improving with each new model. I wanted to model H2O because it has special property’s. I modeled O2 first, to understand the logic of Protons, and it provided me with the best model for atomic oxygen {O}. I used that model to determine what H2O would be. There's a problem solving logic applied to each step I am taking. An

element like Nitrogen, as you can imagine , would have been too difficult to try first. Triple bonds and much unknown design problems. The amazing thing about the oxygen, and the water, is that there is support for the Hydrogen bonding of multiple molecules of water. If you look at the beautiful pattern of internal boson symmetry’s, first you see the empty center. This allows the atoms to line up in layers, above and below the plane. In the 3-D world, the two hydrogen atoms are tilted up. Also, oxygen atom itself has internal planar curve and charge cavity, due to empty center. together these declinations of curved space provide interlacing between molecules, where the charges line up. If you tilt your head to the side, you can see that it is a nearly perfect square outline of the molecule, (diamond -like). Under extreme pressure I am sure this can model the property’s of solid crystalline H2O. I hope the model helps to solve many mystery’s of water for scientists, as it can serve as a calculator. Also, for the first time, I indicated the free electrons which can "orbit and return to the atom". I used * asterisk symbol for now. There is more to say, but this is good for a start. Enjoy!! Mark"

Mark June 23 at 8:13pm "6-23-2011 Sometimes both questions, if they are good questions , lead to the same answer. Charles A Laster presentation of the magic numbers (and complete electron shells) has some relationship to meson performance and the quark charges. Up to this point, the searches for magic numbers brings some useful patterns, , and the quark calculations brings up myriads of charge tables, to the measure that there are now more quark types listed than elements in the periodic table!! (a slight exaggeration, but to make a subtle point). So, here we are, with all this complexity, and not connecting the 2 things simply and directly. Might as well put it away and go play Dominoes..........hmmmmm Domino's? You may well have noticed that the quark inner fields are coded and it looks like an advanced form of domino’s. Sometimes there are 2,3,4,5 and 6 numbers in the node !! These wheels with numbers are the overlapping values that recalculate the spacial continuum. In other words, the same modulation that provides the fields with kinetic energy also sets a frequency and motion to the values, as to circulate the patterns in a logistical manner. Some of the results are just repetitive waves (standing waves) and some are resultants. Some of the resultants affect particle behavior such as electrons and photons, and conformation of the nucleus. The standing waves from quarks have another result. They provide additional Mass , when they are layered over each other as planes. That is because the force vectors between hyperspace fields is an interaction that is entirely different than the vectors to external fields. That is the first premise of my orbital theory (and to Charles), as I continue to build smaller atoms, I wish to keep an eye on what we may learn as we complete orbital shells, which means some design candidates for Nobel gases to consider. I imagine the reason that shells are complete, by designing quark matrices where all the electron potential faces interior to the function. That will become clear when I post these designs in an hour. I have called the shell completions decouplers for another good reason. They allow standing waves to occur within the shell, and close the shell to bonding, while at the same time allow energy to be released, as photons. This is because the spaces act as phantom quarks. That also will become more easy to understand when you see the designs, which all utilize AG#5. I suggest you go and study AG#5 before you review the new manifolds. Best Regards, Mark"

Mark June 23 at 9:09pm "6-23-2011 Theoretical Atomic Manifold for Neon, a Nobel Gas with quasicubic symmetry and a complete electron shell. The model is so accurate that if you count the electrons inside the hyper-space, it counts exactly to 10, and that breaks down by symmetry to 2 and 8 (radially symmetric). The 2 electrons that do not have opposing electron vectors point to the center field (-1/-1). I used AG#5 from the QLS manifold set, due to all the charges being either -1 on one side or +1 on the other. This allows symmetrical tightly spiraled rings. This allows for the internal quantum space to be equal to 2 phantom quarks , also adding to the mass because this is contained hyperspace. The implications of this are photon emission property's. Also note there are no electron portals on the periphery. The emission pattern also matches actual property's, as there are two loops, one above the plane, and one below, that characterize emissions from this atom. As with each model, there's more features to data mine, but I think this is sufficient to define the element Neon."

Mark June 23 at 10:04pm "6-23-2011 Theoretical Sulfur atom using QLS manifold AG#5. Long story short, The electrons match up. The new concept is a tough pill for some to swallow.....but at least I am showing why there are phantom quarks that have mass. These internalized fields have everything except a singularity. Because the are 3 of them, they appear to act as 8 normal particles due to hyperplanes between the parsecs (Mass is the space between the particles). Right now it is the only possible explanation, because they would be metals if we added extra planes of protons, and that would destroy the property's of the orbitals (at least it seems so). Either way, this is the best way to show phantom quarks (in case I add layers to the model later). What is a nice feature is the 2 orbitals on the outside of the Sulfur Ring, and the 6 electrons on the inside that are available. The other 8 electrons are also shown/internally symmetry sealed. The model does not seem to fit any other element. Consider it a work in progress."

Shreyak June 23 at 10:17pm "THE O2 MODEL DEFINED ACC. TO FaTe June 24th,2011 I shall post the diagram later because it isn't so imp for current description. Almost all of you have studied Lewis dot structures earlier. Keeping that in mind, one can derive the O2 out of fibers. I have posted the formula to calculate the required fibers. This model works both with fibers as well as for QLS Manifolds.

We start by considering 3 fibers for each proton, i.e. 3*16=48 fibers excluding neutrons and 16 more for electrons. So, total fibers in a stable oxygen is 48+16+24=88 fibers. Now for O2, we have 72 fibers in nucleus and 10 in up to 2nd shell and six in valence shell. One fiber is equivalent to one string of specified oscillation. Every valence string has a strain(St€). Which represents bonding field state for that string. For 6 free electron strings, (St€)=0 and for those in a bond Bo<4, (St€)=Bo This way both grid concept and QLS manifold can be reached." Mark "Is there a construct name for a closed shell of electrons? " Shreyak "In FaTe?? Not yet. But the construct is in FaTe " Mark "Last attempt...The CAL184 E-Boundary ....any of the smaller shells can be called : CAL 8 EBOUNDARY for example" Mark June 24 at 3:39pm "STRING THEORY REFRESHER PART 1 6-24-2011 The fine structure for Universal data is smaller than the fine structure of space for dimensions above 1. A singularity of 1 Dimension has 3 (in our model) encapsulated data bits that cannot be destroyed, by matter or wave. A singularity can be considered a 1 -dimensional wave of metric value. It can interact with a higher dimensional environment , if it is bridged with, first, a 2 dimensional string that can entangle in the singularity, and conduct the values along 2 dimensions by a process called oscillation. Oscillation in 2 dimensions is not a vibrating guitar string, where the string moves side to side. It is a periodic change in order along the length of the string, where data moves 1 fine structure increment at a time along the length. Any number of data bits above 3 can define discrete data, any data sets 2 or less will be found ambiguous due to symmetry. A string can maintain the order of data, above 3 bits minimum. There are two discrete data patterns that can travel infinitely , from origin to destination, and yet be discrete. They are 1/-1/0/1/-1/0...infinity and 1/0/-1/1/0/-1....infinity. Rather than being identical as vectors, they are mirror images of each other. Upon integration into higher dimensions, such as time and gravity and EM, etc, both the metric quality’s of this order and the scalar quality’s of this order provide for synchronization of orderly events between constructs dependent on the data from the same string system. If a loop of string passes through all of the singularity’s, then all the functions in the constructs on the strings are going to oscillate at the same order of string data. If the constructs around the singularity are toroidal, then the potential for reading the string is enhanced by 2 dimensions. 1 is scalar and 1 is metric. This is because the values of the string order can become mirrored. This allows for the first dimension of symmetry expansion. The integration of data recycle rotation (scalar) around the torus is the function that results in creating time. It also allows for 2 conditions in toroidal metric space (the planes on either side that contact the torus )....complementary rotation and mirror symmetry...which is a significant rotation when applied to quark family’s. My chart QLS manifold, maps the 3 aspects on each row of complementary temporal timing (order) and mirror temporal timing (order). The differences in symmetry provide significant differences in quark pair resultants. If you examine the chart again you will see that the order in the Tachyon rings is a permutation of both cases. That seems to be enough for this comment." Mark June 24 at 4:43pm "STRING THEORY ENHANCEMENTS: PART 2: Experiments with the QLS manifold , in attempts to produce atomic models have been very successful. Intuition and luck have both played a role in selecting the correct sequences of logic, thus saving time and effort, in creating the Quantum Spacial Maps. According to our model, the Ternary Quarks are synchronized in one of two ways from the singularity (refer to Part 1). That means that they can rotate the 3 lobe values in either the same direction of rotation, or in opposite directions of rotation. To make this even more interesting, the way we combine the QLS manifolds also affects them through coupling and decoupling. We have assigned the lobes the same data values of 1/-1/0 without doing any amplitude calculations

(for 5 dimensions), because I desired to make sure we had discrete or non discrete data relationships. All of the discrete relationships are indeed preserved. That means that , of the 6 AG conformations, even though charge or rotation of the subsets are similar, each AGram is unique. Also, each combination of AGrams is also a unique resultant, in space-time and MASS (relative MASS). The differences have allowed me to logically deduce where and how Mass is derived. This is because it appears that the directions of rotations alone can double the Mass in the same Quantum Space. Moreover, Pairing the constructs, in a selective way, can either increase Mass by another factor of 2 (coupling), or , we can end up with decoupling, and losing fractional Mass, but also gain phantom quarks in the interior of the Atoms. MASS is then a type of Inertia that is dependent on the synchronized data sequences that result in unspecified fields that interact in quark pairs. Quarks without such data, or pairing, would then have little or no Mass. That concludes Part 2." Mark June 24 at 9:55pm "6-24-2011 Model of Dihyrogen Monosulfide : construct of AG#2 and AG#5 QLS manifold types. Sulfur as a gas due to protonation (H2). Notice how the structure resembles the Nobel gas (not to mention the exact Atomic weight) of Argon. Since we already modeled Neon , a comparison can be made. I am considering H2SO4, which is much more complex. I will have to scale down the Quantum Calculator , so I am not sure how clear the calculations will appear."

Mark June 24 at 12:11pm "6-24-2011 Thought for The Day : Kasule Francis brought out an interesting line of questions, which I replied as best as I was prepared to do at this time. I thank him for always indicating what is the most useful topic to redefine or explore. The examples show the academic attempts to model different aspects of the primordial functions, using the metric and scalar models of higher functions for particles, and reducing them to smaller aspects and effects. I think it's called a reductionist approach (not certain). In painting it's called impressionism. I call it that because the brain see a picture, based on experiences, but in truth, there is no mapping that provides a direct connection between the equally parsed pixels. The mapping is all about color and emotive conjecture that is experienced as a whole, and falls apart upon close inspection of the details. Look too close and you can't see anything at all. I really feel that way about the tachyon model most of all. I did less comments because it is a subject we need to define in our model. We have moved quickly from the singularity to the magnetic superfields around the quantum ring, but perhaps I should have produced a labeled construct to allow for speculation on how it functions. How does a string produce a kinetic active signal? I assure you I have a conceptualization of it, but I felt an urgency to provide the whole map so as to give other friend's work on the larger scale problems. I am considering returning to the scalar-metric simulation that got us here, and explaining a little more about the tachyon field, because it will also let me get to the quark manifold questions in more detail, that Kasule has posted. After all, if you are going to dispute or analyze some very fine attempts by others, you have to have a darn good model of your own."

Shreyak June 25 at 10:05am "PURE RELATIVITY IN GRID June 25th, 2011 The D=4 grid fabric is equivalent to a region of 4D space-time fabric in relativity. Now we can apply General Relativity and predict that due to mass 4D grid curvature occurs and the fibers due to increased curvature tensor, bend and this is observable. Now for the interesting part, these fibers emit graviton strings which close due to fiber curvature. I have already shown how fiber oscillations lead to Einstein field equations. So, this is just an attempt to superimpose gravitons and fiber curvature." Mark June 25 at 12:38am "6-24-2011 Theoretical Model for H2SO4 : using QSL manifolds #1,#2 and #5. This is the most complex design so far. It shows the arrangement of the bosons and also the covalent bonds. There was only 1 possible solution set in this type of projection. Keep in mind the bond angles are in and out of the plane, projecting forward and back. I still have not obtained a POV ray I can turn the views with. Quantum calculations werenot adjusted for the boson resultants, but I was just rying to get the spacial placement and bond lengths of the proper order. Enjoy !"

Shreyak June 26 at 4:57am "MUON CONSIDERATION IN FaTe WITHOUT MAIN GRID June 26th, 2011 What i mean is that we can quite easily describe mesons(especially pions and kaons) in closed free spaces that are free from the grid. We know that a meson is formed of 2 quarks(with a strange quark for kaons). This can be shown at the free grid(which is different from main grid where most interactions take places). Mesons are formed near(very near!) to the corner fields because the free grid creates a low quark potential and it takes a very large energy to eject quarks out of the CFs. Quarks are ejected and form pairs that Mark implied. These quark pairs are mesons that can travel to main grid." Shreyak June 27 at 3:21am "WORK UPDATE June 27th, 2011www.wikipedia.org/yang-millstheory I am currently applying the yang-mills theory along with Feynman rules to describe and capture dynamics in the grid. I have majorly used Hamiltonians that are Lorentz invariant in D=10. Type IIA strings and branes (mainly D3 branes and five branes) are very effective at grid surfaces. Grid Field transformations are Lorentz invariant too. I have till now derived a single Hamiltonian." Mark June 28 at 1:35am "6-28-2011 CARBON 6 PROTONIC MODEL mol wt 12 : based on AG#2 ....please note that when I first tried to model C6 I used a Neutron version of the QLS manifold. A neutron construct has different charges and also has less constraint in the subatomic boson length. This leads to different degrees of freedom in the conformations, if there are potential pivotal axis (as in Carbon 6) I hope this model makes up for what may have been a confusing first post. It took lots of practice to make the 3 most recent posts with greater accuracy, but they were right on target. So , I went back and fixed a mistake . The earlier C6 was presented as a ring of 6, but it makes no sense to present that format as it does not agree with the bonding angles nor the charges. The only detail not

adjusted for (total charges are correct) is that I did not invert the top kaons to mirror the bottom row (all peripheral charges do match). Too tired to change it now. It really doesn't matter anyway. What is really nifty is you can see how CH4 would be symmetrical, and also visualize how the double bond chains would form. Perhaps tomorrow I will post some simple hydrocarbons from this."

Shreyak June 28 at 4:50am "WORK UPDATE WITH PUBLICATION June 28,2011 I have been able to show duality in fiber oscillations in five brane grid surfaces. I shall give reference of group members (Mark Aaron Simpson, Charles A Laster, Manoj Joshi and Bob Turner) for support and suggestions in my newt paper: Grid Dualities" Mark June 28 at 3:41pm "6-28-2011 CARBON DIOXIDE Theoretical model , QLS manifold constructs. Design is self-explanatory. I will try to model other hydrocarbons later. Perhaps also Nitrogen. Enjoy!'

Mark June 28 at 10:54pm "6-28-2011 Nitrogen: Theoretical Nucleonic Construct: based on AG#2 QLS manifold. Super symmetry rest conformation shown. Really didn't see this form until I wrestled for 2 days with Carbon. Turns out amazingly simple and surprising. I love discovery’s. Now I wonder whether I can map this into a carbon net to simulate the Nitrogen impressed Carbon forms in a Quantum memory mesh (as per article on Nitrogen-diamond quantum memory). I know they won't all be this easy. Just grateful that I am finding the form and function."

June 28 at 11:12pm Charles A Laster was made an admin by Mark Aaron Simpson. Mark June 29 at 4:43pm "6-29-2011 Theoretical super nuclei of 1 part Nitrogen (see other post) and 3 parts Carbon (see other post). Amazingly, these fit together perfectly and it has some very interesting property's. Visually and conceptually. There are 6 peripheral bounds to mount the construct, possibly for quantum computer functionality. In order to maintain super symmetry in the design, there are 6 equi-valent electron bonds. These are not typical bonds, even though it appears that way in the simple stick Diagram (appears as double bonds). Assuming the conformation is possible, the N nucleus would have 1 remaining electron and 3 possible locations for it to migrate. Additionally, the quantum spacial matrix in the center of the super nuclei would go to negative Mass periodically. Lastly, the String Data matrix in the central singularity could potentially be reprogrammed, as one quark of the pair is naked and stabilized. Usually this would have a half life of only minutes. I would say, without a doubt , that this construct is just the right design to stimulate thinking about just how much potential the geometry of the nucleus contains, if we can obtain the level of dimensionality indicated in this model. I was trying to analyze this conventionally, and tried to classify it. It is obviously higher than 5 dimensional wave table, our typical QLS quantum space. We have a half naked singularity with only 1 electron in lower shell. So even our 1 dimensional singularity has only 2 data states instead of 3. This changes the quantum calculation to Binary. I am loosely calling this dimensional condition, in order from high to low....a 5/3/1 dimensional construct. That is 9 out of a possible 11 dimensions based on our Golden FaTe. The two missing dimensions , out of Domain, are due to loss of gravity and time (within the construct itself)as resultants from the singularity. I hope I didn't give anyone too much of a headache. It's my best simulation on a very new principle, but it all makes logical sense to me. I don't know how many other designs will provide such exciting prospects, so I did not waste any effort with delay. I am presenting this theory at this time. This Theory states that this construct is potentially stable and out of Universal Domain. I am tentatively calling it the D9 Capsule . Best Regards, Mark"

Mark June 29 at 10:49pm "6-29-2011 : Presenting C3N with color coded subatomic matrix. I used Hue and overlays to quickly produce a representation that shows the different subatomic matrix. Nitrogen is shown in red. Carbon is represented by Green. Perhaps the super symmetry is even more obvious now. Additionally, the bias in rotational symmetry is also evident. Such rotational bias is necessary in a construct if wave table performance is needed to translate a set of values over quantum space. The mounting stability suggests that the bias wave is reversible, because it can be limited to electron location on the low fields. We do not have a standard condition where the uncertainty principle applies. Rather, we have a certainty principle !! The theory is, depending on the application of charge to the carbon mounts, the electron will predictably be in only 1 location in the center matrix. Also plausible, but stretching the theory to it's limit, it may be possible to have a dangling photon. That means the photon is also exactly located (does not have velocity). This location would be above the singularity (which is data reluctant)"

[1] Shreyak Chakraborty The FaTe Model of Hyperspace http://www.scribd.com/doc/58359323/FaTe-model-of-hyperspace http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php?id=100001567973433 [2] Mark Aaron Simpson http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php?id=1178795215 [2a] String Theory Development http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/home.php? sk=group_183288925052025&ap=1http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php? id=1178795215 [3]Charles A. Laster http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/home.php? sk=group_183288925052025&ap=1http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php? id=1178795215

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->