P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 277 - MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.277.0

LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 277 - MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.277.0

|Views: 56|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
07/07/2011 277 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford Denying Request to File Temporary Restraining Order. (See Order for details) (db) (Entered: 07/07/2011)
07/07/2011 277 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford Denying Request to File Temporary Restraining Order. (See Order for details) (db) (Entered: 07/07/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jul 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/08/2011

pdf

text

original

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 277 #:6754

Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2 Page ID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title SACV 11-0485 AG (AJWx) LISA LIBERI, et al. v. ORLY TAITZ, et al. Date July 7, 2011

Present: The Honorable Lisa Bredahl Deputy Clerk

ANDREW J. GUILFORD Not Present Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings:

[IN CHAMBERS] ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

On June 30, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a request seeking leave to file an emergency temporary restraining order against Defendant Orly Taitz. In a dense single-spaced two-page letter, Plaintiffs discuss some recent and some on-going actions allegedly taken by Defendant Taitz and some actions taken by non-parties to this lawsuit. Emergency motions, especially emergency temporary restraining orders, raise serious due process concerns. Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80-82 (1972) (due process requires that affected parties “are entitled to be heard” following “meaningful” notice, except in “extraordinary situations”); Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337, 339-40 (1969) (“the right to be heard ‘has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest’”). The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 2

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 277 #:6755

Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2 Page ID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title SACV 11-0485 AG (AJWx) LISA LIBERI, et al. v. ORLY TAITZ, et al. : Initials of Preparer lmb 0 Date July 7, 2011

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->