## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Cost of Capital and its financial importance for the company and future investors. The management of Nike Inc. addresses issues both on top-line growth and operating performance. The company's cost of capital is a critical element in such decisions and it is important to estimate precisely the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). In our analysis, we examine why WACC is important in decision making and we show how WACC for Nike Inc. is calculated correctly. Also, we calculate the company's cost of equity using three different models: the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Dividend Discount Model (DDM) and the Earnings Capitalization Model (EPS/ Price), we analyze their advantages and disadvantages and finally we conclude whether or not an investment in Nike is recommended. Our analysis suggests that Nike Inc.'s common stock should be added to the North Point Group's Mutual Fund Portfolio. I. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital and its Importance for Nike Inc. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is the average of the costs of a company's sources of financing-debt and equity, each of which is weighted by its respective use in the given situation. By taking a weighted average, we can see how much interest the company has to pay for every marginal dollar it finances. A firm's WACC is the overall required return on the firm as a whole and, as such, it is often used internally by company directors to determine the economic feasibility of expansionary opportunities and mergers. Also, WACC is the appropriate discount rate to use in stock valuation. II. Calculation of Nike's WACC The calculating methodology for Nike's Inc. WACC seems to be inconsistent with the principles1 that should be followed when estimating this measure. These are our points of disagreement with the calculations in Exhibit 5: - Calculation of the cost of debt by taking the total interest expense for the year 2001 dividing it by the company's average debt balance, which is not appropriate for the WACC estimation - Use as tax rate the sum of state and statutory taxes instead of the firm's marginal tax rate - Use of the Book Value of equity rather than the market value which is suggested as it gives more precise results - Calculation of the cost of equity using long time period for risk free rate and

we reexamine the cost of debt (Kd) which in this case is the yield to maturity (YTM) on the bonds. which were based on book values (debt 27% and equity 73%).4357m).S.16%.65% whereas debt is 11. the previous explanation shows that equity is 88. There are three ways to calculate the cost of equity (Ke). The weights of the costs. Wd and We.c1 (See Appendix for detailed calculations) The second variable that should be noted is T or the tax rate.risk premium In order to make our justifications more comprehensive we need the formula for estimating WACC: WACC= Wd*Kd(1-T) + We*Ke First.6m (current portion of L-T debt + notes payable + LT debt).296.35% unlike Cohen's calculations. The marginal tax rate generally refers to the "federal income tax that is levied onto the additional dollar earned" and usually is about 40%. Km is the required return of the market. market values of debt and equity give a closer estimation of the capital structure2. In her calculations. In calculating that part of the equation. CAPM Equation is: Ke=Krf+ β. the book value gives a close estimation for the current value. Thus. In our calculations of WACC we use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).39) U. For debt. debt is equal to $1. β. are very important in calculating WACC as they show the company's capital structure. Joanna Cohen used the book values of debt and equity where the market values are suggested as they provide more accurate results. where Ke is the cost of equity. The YTM is a good estimate for the cost of debt if a company had issued debt in the past and the bonds are publicly traded just as in Nike's case.(Km-Krf)c2. In finding the weights.Krf) is equal to the market risk premium. We calculate the enterprise value (P0*#shares outstanding = $11. whereas the same doesn't hold for the value of equity. is beta that measures the tendency of a stock to move up and down with the market. as it is considered to be the most complete model for estimating the cost of equity. we used the current yield on 10yr bond (5. . Our calculations for Nike's yield to maturity based on the given data showed that Kd= 7. For the Krf (risk free rate). Joanna Cohen added the 3% state taxes to the 35% statutory tax where in WACC calculation the marginal rate should be used. Krf is the risk free rate and (Km . As book and market values of debt and equity may differ a lot.427. which we will examine later.

If this assumption is reasonable. Km . which compares forecasted earnings for the next period over the current share price. However.treasuries. because of the estimate of Beta we use. other firms in the industry). After we calculate the cost of equity with CAPM (Ke= 11. On the other hand. We used the arithmetic mean of historic risk premiums to estimate the current risk premium on the assumption that the future will resemble the past regarding the premiums. These approaches are the Dividend Discount Model (DDM). CAPM is based on simplifying assumptions about markets. we used the arithmetic mean (7. by using betas for similar firms (e. This method can be applied to firms that do not pay dividends as well as new firms. CAPM approach is considered to be an accurate and precise estimate of Ke. we plug our results in the given formula of WACC and we get WACC=10. there are two other models used by those analysts who do not have complete confidence in CAPM. hence to determine the effect of the new activities and projects of the company on stock price. gave us the following results: Using DDM: Ke= 6.8).88% We can see that the three different methods of calculating the cost of equity produced widely varied estimates. for the next 20 years. Our calculations. The dividend discount model (DDM) is a simple model for valuing equity.39%). In such situations the financial analyst has to use his/her judgement as to relative merits of each estimate and then choose the estimate which seemed more reasonable under the circumstances. For the market risk premium.7% Using ECM: Ke= 9.5%). then the annual arithmetic average is the theoretically correct predictor for the next year's risk premium4.g. Also.. returns and investor behaviour. For β.Krf. instead of the 20yr. as the 10yr matches the duration of cash flows for the Nike's investment project (Exhibit 2) and because it is relatively less exposed to unexpected changes in inflation and the liquidity premium when compared to the longer 20 yr bond3. we found that the main advantage of CAPM approach is that it takes into consideration a company's market risk as the most relevant risk to stockholders. the geometric average is a better predictor of the risk premium over a longer future interval such as. with CAPM all our projections are based on historical data onto the future. III. which are analyzed in the Appendix (c4 and c5 respectively). we used the historic average of the past 6 years (0. It is . which compares dividends forecasted for the next period with the current share price for the firm and then adds the growth rate of the firm and the Earnings Capitalization Model (ECM). Comparing the already discussed methods. Alternative Methods of Calculating the Cost of Equity Although.59c3.

the sensitivity analysis revealed that Nike was undervalued at discount rates below 11. especially when the company's past growth has been abnormally high or low or there are general economic fluctuations. On the other hand. The earnings capitalization model (ECM) is a simple model and easy to understand. IV. Mistakes to Avoid when Calculating WACC . Appendix 1. However. it is considered poor in estimating equity costs for growing firms. which makes Nike a good investment. Nike was overvalued at its current share price of $42. As Nike's common stock is undervalued and the company has a positive EVA. Furthermore. Our results give a positive EVA for Nike at $304. However. However.5 which means that the company adds to its shareholders' value.considered to be a good thinking exercise as it forces the investors to begin thinking about different scenarios in relation to how the market is pricing the stock. the appropriate discount rate. Is Nike a Good Investment for the time being? The Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (Exhibit 2) showed that at the discount rate of 12%. We estimated WACC. This shows that Nike is undervalued at the discount rate equal to WACC.2%. dividend discount model requires an enormous amount of speculation in trying to forecast future dividends.59% which is less than 11.09.2%. at 10. Finally there are no direct adjustments for risk in this method. it should be added to the North Point Large Cap Fund. Meaning that a model is only as good as the assumptions it is based upon. so it is used as reasonable only for no growth firms. it is quite difficult to establish a proper growth rate. as the North Point Large Cap Fund invests mostly in Fortune 500 companies with an emphasis on value investing we calculated Nike's Economic Value Added (EVA)c6. so the analysts do not project the historic growth rates in the future.

Also. we do not have enough data to support such approach. 2. . Although. 4. However.kRF can be estimated either on the basis of ex-post or historical data or on a basis of ea-ante or looking forward data. especially for the new project. We decided to use the arithmetic mean based on the reasons we gave above but we still believe that the use of current values is better when estimating CAPM. The relevant pre-tax cost of debt is the interest rate the firm would pay if it issued debt today. financial services companies publish regularly forecasts on the expected rate of market risk premium. but it is wrong to subtract the current risk free rate from the historical rate of return on the market. so a potential investor needs to take the average from several forecasts. It seems that these two projects have different risks: mid-priced athletic shoes could be treated as a "new" product for Nike while apparel is already successful and both projects are in different business segments. there are potential problems as well. 3. We can say that the use of multiple costs of capital. the market value of equity may differ significantly. Although debt may have close market and book value. Estimating the Market Risk Premium for CAPM The market risk premium RPM=kM . is reasonable.Use of the current cost of debt. we did not find anything due to limited access on relevant data. Ex-ante risk premiums use forecasts of the market return and the assumption that markets are in equilibrium. Use of historical average return on stocks with the current risk free rate. Use of book values of debt and equity to estimate their weights in WACC. However. Nike provides plenty of other products. Adjusting the Cost of Capital for Risk Nike is planning to focus mainly on two projects in the next year: To develop more athletic-show products in mid-priced segment and to push its apparel line which has already done extremely well. Many consider these forecasts the analysts and not the investors' expectations-although this probably is not a major problem as many studies have shown-and that there are many financial companies that give different forecasts. A case could be made either using the historical risk premium or the current one. Also. historic risk premiums are results of a very complete and accurate study (available from Ibbotson Associates) are usually treated with low confidence from the investors. Use of Historical Arithmetic Mean of Risk Premiums Although we did extended research to find Value Line's forecasts for the rate of return on the market or the risk premium for 2001.

1135 * 7.48(1+.5.5813 semiannually.59% c4.09 D1 = D0(1+g) = 0.39+0.055) = 0.564/ 42.375 (as it pays semiannually) →.5% (Value Line's estimation) P0 = 42. Earnings Capitalization Model (ECM) for Nike's cost of equity (Ke) .16% c2. so. CAPM for Nike's cost of equity Ke = Krf+β.6 FV: 100 n: 40 Pmt: 6.4) + 0.16% (1-. Calculations c1.8(7.7% c5. Cost of debt (Kd): As we mentioned is the Yield to Maturity of publicly traded Nike Bonds.8865 * 11.1627% = YTM= Kd= 7. i: 7. i* = 3.(Km-Krf) = 5.39% = 10.09 + . Dividend Discount Model (DDM) for Nike's cost of equity (Ke) Ke = D1/P0 +g g = 5. WACC = Wd*Kd(1-T) + We*Ke = 0.75/2= 3.5) = 11.055= 6.5064 So. Ke= 0. (Values inserted in financial calculator) PV: -95.39% c3. I/Y=(i*) * 2 →.

5% From the available data we have.621.1572 So.2 (1-0.4 + 1.2 .42*0.88% c6. Ke = E1 / P0= 9.488 ~ 304.5 So.(Operating Capital*WACC) NOPAT = Operating Income (1 .7 = 5.(3.349. EVA = NOPAT . Nike's management reiterated as earning growth rates targets above 15%.1688=0. instead of the Value Line's forecast (5.7/ 3494.1) .618.5*0.618. E1 = (1+g) * E0 / # of share outstanding and g = Retention ratio * ROE We used this estimation for g. EVA= 659.014. Retention Ratio = Retained Earnings / Net Income = 3194.8 Operating capital = 2.914)* 589.Ke = E1 / P0 Where. while dividends are expected to grow 5.88% That gives: g=5.5= 16.445.424.914 E1 = (1+g) * E0 / # of share outstanding = [(1+ 0.1059)= 304. as the earnings and dividends are not expected to have the same growth rate.(432 + 472.5 . Receivables + Inventories) .4 Operating L-T Assets = $1.445. Payables + Accruals) = (304 + 1.8 = $3.1) = $2.5%) that we used in DDM.2 Total Operating capital = Net Operating Working Capital + Operating L-T Assets NOWC = (Cash + Acc.349.Tax) = 1.4 + 1.7 / 271.35) = 659.(Acc.3/ 589.42 ROE = Net Income / Total Shareholders' Equity = 589.5] =4.

- Nike Case Analysis
- Final Case 2 Nike Inc.
- Nike Assignment
- Case Analysis of Nike, Inc.
- Nike, Inc Cost of Capital Case Study
- Nike Case - Team 5 Windsor - Final
- Analysis Slides-WACC Nike
- Nike INC
- Worldwide Paper Company
- Case Study Nike, Inc. - Cost of Capital
- Nike Case Study
- NIKE Inc Cost of Capital _ Financial Management
- Nike, Inc Cheats Kimi Ford
- Nike Inc Cost of Capital Case Analysis
- Case Study
- Nike, Inc
- Investment Detective
- Krispy Kreme Case Analysis
- Boeing 7E7 Case Study Solution
- Case 22 Victoria Chemicals a DONE
- Dividend Policy Case (Gainesboro Machine Tools)-Session 2-Group 8
- information
- CPK Case
- Nike Case Final Group 4 (1)
- Nike Cost of Capital
- Nike, Inc. Cost of Capital
- NIKE,INC COST OF CAPITAL
- The Investment Detective
- Casestudy on Krispy Kreme doughnut
- Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporatio1

- Rocky-Mountain-Power--3-Bruce-N-Williams
- econcomm_19870301.pdf
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.004 05s taught by Mark Laplante (mjl024000)
- FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- The Relationship Between Financial Transactions Costs and Economic Growth
- Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Western Coal Traffic League, Intervenors, Central Illinois Light Company, Intervenors. Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, Southern Company Services, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Western Coal Traffic League, Intervenor, Central Illinois Light Company, Intervenors. Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Western Coal Traffic League, Intervenor, Central Illinois Light Company, Intervenors. Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Western Coal Traffic League, Intervenor, Central Illinois Light Company, Intervenors. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Western Coal Traffic League, Intervenor, Ce
- Unitil-Energy-Systems-Default-Service
- Rocky-Mountain-Power--4-Bruce-N-Williams
- Pacific-Power--Samuel-C-Hadaway
- Pacific-Power--1-Richard-P-Reiten
- Unitil-Energy-Systems-External-Transmission-Charge
- SENATE HEARING, 110TH CONGRESS - THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO THE FREIGHT RAILROAD INDUSTRY
- Speech 957
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.002 06f taught by Robert Bender (rcb013000)
- Rocky-Mountain-Power--3-Bruce-N-Williams
- rev_frbrich198603.pdf
- Pacific-Power--3-Bruce-N-Williams
- frbsf_let_19841102.pdf
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company William M. Gibbons, Trusteeof the Property of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, as Trustee, Andnot Individually, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlingtonnortherninc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroadcompany, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroadcompany, Western Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Intervenors. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,western Pacificrailroad Company v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Stanley E. G. Hillman, Trus
- UT Dallas Syllabus for mas6v06.x29.08f taught by David Springate (spring8)
- United States v. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, 366 F.3d 164, 3rd Cir. (2004)
- ACCA P4 December 2015 Notes
- Management Accounting/Series-2-2005(Code3023)
- Chipotle Pitch
- JOINT HEARING, 108TH CONGRESS - THE ADMINISTRATION'S GROWTH AND JOBS PLAN
- Financial Management
- Acca p4 Notes j15

- frbrich_wp78-2.pdf
- ifdp1178
- frbclv_wp1986-11.pdf
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin7330.001 06s taught by Huibing Zhang (hxz054000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for opre7372.001.08f taught by Alain Bensoussan (axb046100)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.hon.10f taught by Robert Bender (rcb013000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.001.08f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.503.10f taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- 67199_1985-1989
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.mbc.08s taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.501 05f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.0u3.11u taught by Robert Bender (rcb013000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.002.11s taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.501.10f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.501.09f taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.001.10f taught by Huibing Zhang (hxz054000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.501 06f taught by Huibing Zhang (hxz054000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.501.10f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.hon.09s taught by Robert Bender (rcb013000)
- frbsf_let_19940408.pdf
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.501.10f taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba3341.002.09s taught by Robert Bender (rcb013000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin7330.001.08s taught by Valery Polkovnichenko (vxp065000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.501.09f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba4346.001.10s taught by Yin Li (yxl062000)
- Pacific-Power--2-Samuel-C-Hadaway
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.001.10f taught by Huibing Zhang (hxz054000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6301.mbc.09s taught by Michael Rebello (mjr071000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.001.09f taught by Huibing Zhang (hxz054000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for fin6310.502.11f taught by Yexiao Xu (yexiaoxu)

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading