P. 1
UP-Evidence Final Reviewer

UP-Evidence Final Reviewer

|Views: 576|Likes:
Published by Sui

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Sui on Jul 23, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/15/2013

pdf

text

original

JURIS NOTES

TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE DISQUALIFICATIONS MENTAL INCAPACITY / IMMATURITY MARITAL DISQUALIFICATION DEAD MAN’S STATUTE
PRIVILEGED MARITAL COMM.
PERSONS DISQUALIFIED Those whose mental condition, at the time of their production for examination, is such that they are incapable of intelligently making known their perception Children whose mental maturity is such as to render them incapable of perceiving the facts respecting which they are examined and of relating them truthfully Spouses, with regard to testimony for or against the other spouse, without his / her consent Parties, or assignors of parties to a case, or persons in whose behalf a case is prosecuted, against an executor or administrator or other representative of a deceased person, or against a person of unsound mind Spouses

PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
ATTORNEY OR HIS EMPLOYEE
Attorney or his secretary, stenographer, or clerk

PHYSICIAN

MINISTER / PRIEST

PUBLIC OFFICER

A person authorized to practice medicine, surgery or obstetrics

Minister / priest

Public officer

REQUISITES

(1) Spouses are legally married. (2) The communication was confidential. (3) It was made during the marriage.

(1) Attorneyclient relation (2) Communication by client to attorney in the course of or with a view to professional employment

(1) Civil case (2) Physicianpatient relation (3) Advice or treatment given or information acquired during course of professional duty (4) Information was necessary

(1) Communication made to public officer (2) Communication made in official confidence (3) Public interest would suffer by the disclosure of the

JURIS NOTES
for performance of professional duty (5) The disclosure would tend to blacken the patient's reputation PERIOD OF DISQUALIFICATION SCOPE OF DISQUALIFICATION During the marriage Any matter of fact occurring before the death of such deceased person, or before such person become of unsound mind During or after the marriage Any communication received in confidence during the marriage Any communication made by the client to the attorney or his advice given thereon in the course of, or with a view to professional employment; or any fact the knowledge of which was acquired by the clerk, stenographer or secretary in his capacity as such Any advice or treatment given by him or any information which he may have acquired in attending such patient in a professional capacity, which information was necessary to enable him to act in that capacity Any confession made to or any advice given by him in his professional character in the course of discipline enjoined by his church communication

During his term of office or afterwards Communications made to him in official confidence

EXCEPTIONS

(1) Civil case by one against the other; (2) Criminal case for crime committed by one against the other, or the latter’s direct descendants / ascendants

(1) Civil case by One against the other; (2) Criminal Case for crime committed by one against the other, or the latter’s direct descendants / ascendants

JURIS NOTES

HOW DISQUALIFICATION CURED WHO MAY INVOKE / OBJECT MAY IT BE WAIVED? WHEN TO BE OBJECTED TO

Consent of the spouse

Consent of the spouse

Consent of the client Client

Consent of the patient Patient

Consent of the person making confession

Yes, by failure to make a timely objection. Before the answer to the question for its revelation

Yes

Yes

JURIS NOTES

EXCEPTIONS TO THE HEARSAY RULE:
(1) DYING DECLARATION Requisites: (1) Death is imminent and declarant is conscious of that fact. (2) The preliminary facts which bring the declaration within its scope must be made to appear. (3) The declaration relates to the facts or circumstances pertaining to the fatal injury or death. (4) Declarant would have been competent to testify had he survived.

(2) DECLARATION AGAINST INTEREST Requisites: 3 (1) Declarant must be deceased or unable to testify. (2) The declaration must concern a fact cognizable by declarant. (3) The circumstances must render it improbable that a motive to falsify 3 existed. (1) Declarant; (2) Declarant’s successors-in-interest; (3) Third persons

Admissible against:

(3) ACT OR DECLARATION ABOUT PEDIGREE PEDIGREE: history of family descent which is transmitted from one generation to another by both oral and written declarations and by traditions.

 Includes the ff.: Requisites: • (1) Declarant is dead or unable to testify. (2) Necessity that pedigree be in issue. (3) Declarant must be a relative of the person whose pedigree is in question. (4) Declaration must be made before the controversy occurred. (5) The relationship between the declarant and the person whose pedigree is in question must be shown by evidence other than such act or declaration.

(4) FAMILY REPUTATION OR TRADITION REGARDING PEDIGREE Requisites: (1) There is controversy in respect to the pedigree of any members of a family. (2) The reputation or tradition of the pedigree of the person concerned existed previous to the controversy. (3) The witness testifying to the reputation or tradition regarding the pedigree of the person concerned must be a member of the family of said person, either by consanguinity or affinity.

(5) COMMON REPUTATION Matters that may be established by common reputation: (1) Facts of public or general interest more than 30 years old; (2) Marriage and related facts; (3) Individual moral character. Requisites: (1) The facts must be of public or general interest and more than 30 years old. (2) The common reputation must have been ancient, i.e. 30 years or one generation old.

JURIS NOTES
(3) The reputation must have been one formed among a class of persons who were in a position to have some sources of information and to contribute intelligently to the formation of the opinion. (4) The common reputation must have been existing prior to the controversy. (6) PART OF THE RES GESTAE
(a) Spontaneous statements - statements or exclamations made immediately after

some exciting occasion by a participant or spectator and asserting the circumstances of that occasion as it is observed by him. Requisites: (1) There must be a startling occurrence. (2) The statement must relate to the circumstances of the startling occurrence. (3) The statement must be spontaneous. desired to give a legal effect. Requisites: (1) (2) (3) (4) The act or occurrence must be equivocal. Verbal acts characterize or explain the equivocal act. Equivocal act must be relevant to the issue. Verbal acts must be contemporaneous with equivocal act.

(b) Verbal Acts - utterances which accompany some act or conduct to which it is

(7) ENTRIES IN THE COURSE OF BUSINESS Requisites: (1) Entries must have been made at or near the time of the transaction to which they refer. (2) Entrant must have been in a position to know the facts stated in the entries. (3) Entries must have been made by entrant in his professional capacity or in the performance of his duty. (4) Entries were made in the ordinary or regular course of business or duties. (5) Entrant must be deceased or unable to testify.

(8) ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS (9) COMMERCIAL LISTS AND THE LIKE (10) LEARNED TREATISES TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER PROCEEDING AUTHENTICATION AND PROOF OF DOCUMENTS When is evidence of the authenticity of a private document not necessary? When the document is: (1) more than 30 years old, (2) produced from a custody in which it would naturally be found if genuine, and (3) unblemished by any alterations or circumstances of suspicion. (Rule 132, Sec. 21) How may the genuineness of handwriting be proved? (1) It may be proved by any witness who believes it to be the handwriting of such person because:

JURIS NOTES
(a) he has seen the person write, or (b) he has seen writing purporting to be his upon which the witness has acted or been charged and has thus acquired knowledge of the handwriting of such person. (2) It may also be proved by way of comparison, made by: (a) the witness; or (b) the court with writings admitted or treated as genuine by the party against whom the evidence is offered, or proved to be genuine to the satisfaction of the judge. (Rule 132, Sec. 22) How may official records be proved? (1) By an official publication thereof; or (2) By a copy attested by the officer having the legal custody of the record, or by his deputy. Note: If the record is not kept in the Philippines, the attestation must be accompanied with a certificate that such officer has the custody. If the office in which the record is kept is in a foreign country, the certificate may be made by: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) secretary of the embassy or legation; consul-general; consul; vice-consul; consular agent; or any officer of the foreign service of the Philippines stationed in the foreign country in which the record is kept.

In all these cases, the certification must be authenticated by the seal of his office. (Rule 132, Sec. 24) How may a judicial record be impeached? By evidence of: (1) want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer; (2) collusion between the parties; or (3) fraud in the party offering the record, in respect to the proceedings. (Rule 132, Sec. 29) How must alterations be accounted for? The party producing a document as genuine may show that the alteration: (1) (2) (3) (4) was made by another without his concurrence; or was made with the consent of the parties affected by it; or was otherwise properly or innocently made, or did not change the meaning or language of the instrument.

What is the effect of failure to explain alterations in a document? The document shall not be admissible in evidence.

JURIS NOTES

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->