P. 1
Capacity for a Change

Capacity for a Change

|Views: 31|Likes:
Published by Peter Clarke

More info:

Published by: Peter Clarke on Jul 23, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





It is apparent from a survey of Donor reports2

that CD spending is vast,even though

figures are rarely collected,systematically,by donors on their expenditures.Statistics on

capacity development should always be treated with some caution as the DAC itself

advises (2007:112).A figure oft cited is that 25% of overseas development assistance is

accounted for by CD (e.g.Whyte,2004:8;Collier,2007) but this depends on the definition

of CD used.If CD is equated with technical assistance (TA) then the 25% figure is account-

ed for more easily.Supposing that CD is defined as TA,then the largest donors annually

(2005) in absolute terms are USAID (US$10bn),BMZ (US$2bn) and JICA (US$2bn).If we

look at percentage of total aid expenditure while defining CD as TA then the largest

donors annually (2005) are USAID (38%),DFID (31%),BMZ (22%) and CIDA (22%).


Who is defining what
Capacity Development is,
and for what?

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->