Leveraging NREGA Funds To Create Productive Agriculture Assets To Make Agriculture Profit-Making & Sustainable Vol V

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Supported a Livelihood Improvement by Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive agriculture assets
Final Report
Volume V
JANAKALYAN has initiated an innovative intervention with the support of Sir Dorabji Tata Trust in 17 villages of Sindhanur taluk to create productive agriculture assets by leveraging NREGA funds through community capacity building and complementing the efforts of government machineries
JANAKALYAN
Shantinagar, R H Colony No.4
Sindhanur584128
Raichur District
Karnataka, India www.jankalyan.in
email: jankalyana@yahoo.co.in
February 2010 March 2011

5/4/2011
Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA
Final Report
Index Chapter Particulars Raichur District & NREGA at a glance Journey of Janakalyan through NREGA Problems of tail-end farmers and solutions through NREGA Page No. 3 5 6 8 8 8 10 11 12 12 14 17 19 22 35 37 38 42 43 45 46 47 50 52 52 53
55 56 57 66 73 85 89 90
Chapter I Progress during reporting period

1.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.3 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.3.5 1.3.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4
Annex 1 Annex 2 Annex 3 Annex 4 Annex 5 Annex 6 Annex 7 Annex 8
Sensitization Campaign for 3 tiers PRI members District Level Workshop Taluk Level Workshop Gram Panchayat Level Workshops Empowering communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning tools Gram Sabha in villages Situation Analysis Micro Planning Implementation of shelf of works to generate employment and create productive agriculture assets through communities Promote Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG) Facilitation of asset building activities Implement SRI Implement LEISA with IIFS Supplement income by growing High Yielding Varieties Introduce Collective Purchase of inputs and sale of produces Major Problems faced in implementing the activities Solutions to the problems How these could have been better implemented Learning Plan of Action for next 3 years to make it a replicable model Strategies to implement the program Anticipated Problems Strategies to ensure participation of all stakeholders
Chapter II Learning from Field
Chapter III Action Plan
Additional Information from the field

Gram Sabha Details Situation Analysis Detail List of WEG members List of AIG members NREGA shelf of work execution details Vegetable cultivation details List of Gram Panchayat members Field Team
An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives
.2
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur
Raichur District & NREGA at a Glance

Raichur is the most backward (last ranked) district in Karnataka as per HDI and thus Government of India considered implementation of NREGA in the very first phase of 200 districts brought under the umbrella of this ambitious scheme in India. Fortunately, Government of Karnataka assigned the responsibility of preparing 5-year Perspective Plans of all 34 Gram Panchayats (281 out of 830 villages) in Sindhanur taluk of Raichur district in this first phase to Janakalyan. The demographic details about the district is provided in the table belowRural Population Total Population Literacy (female) Male Population
Blocks
Deodurga Lingasugur Manvi Raichur Sindhanur Total %
1508 1948 1791 1541 1598 8386
112245 162628 166063 220675 180229 841840 50.42
110212 158414 164656 214705 179935 827922 49.58
222457 321042 330719 435380 360164 1669762
200463 247478 293106 208976 298902 1248925 74.80
21994 73564 37613 226404 61262 420837 33.70
44349 68412 62239 82649 59630 317279 19.00
74910 51332 77956 52129 46715 303042 18.15
173 186 164 147 160 830
28 35 36 31 34 164
36709 54074 59904 81205 65763
51.73 66.28 54.79 66.28 65.46
27.20 36.27 30.71 45.45 37.81 36.84
39.56 51.39 42.78 56.05 51.56 49.54
297655 62.02
Raichur district lies in the north-eastern part of the state and falls in North Dry Agro climatic Zone. It is 7th largest district in Karnataka and consists of 5 taluks. It is facing drought due to erratic rainfall for several years. It is predominantly agrarian with not many major / medium industrial units. The total geographical area is 6827 sq. km with 1.579% covered by forests. The district has 5 taluks with 830 inhabited villages; Population (2001 Census) is 16.70 lakh with 12.49 lakh in rural areas; average population density is 245 per sq. km. It is known for rice crop with a total area of 1.6 lakh ha under the crop. Sorghum and sunflower are other important crops. Raichur is last ranked district in the state mainly due to educational backwardness and health services and employment generation and industries as per the HDI.
Final Report (February 2010 March 2011)
.3
Literacy (Total)
Literacy (Male)
SC Population
No. of villages
ST Population
No of households
Female Population
Urban Population
No. of GP
Area (Sq. Km)

The following tables provide the details about the block-wise data on job cards, demand for employment, employment provided, number of person-days of employment generated along with the details on families completed 100 days of works, disabled beneficiaries, land reform/ IAY beneficiaries, etc. The table also gives the caste-wise bifurcation on job cards as well as employment generated during the fiscal year 200910. Employment generated during the financial year 2009-2010 (up to March 2010)
1 2
No. of HH working under NREGA during the reporting month
3 c
4 d
Cumulative No. of HH demanded employment (Till the reporting month)
5
Cumulative No. of HH provided employment (Till the reporting month)
6 a b c
7 d e
8
Cumulative No. of HH c ompleted 100 days (Till the reporting month)
9
No. of HH which are beneficiary of land reform/IAY
10
Block
Cumulative Person-days generated (Till the reporting month)
SCs
STs
Others
Total
SCs
STs
Others
Total
Women
1 2 3 4 5 Total
DEVADURGA LINGSUGUR MANVI RAICHUR SINDHNUR
Percentage
5249 5071 9889 5854 6223 32286 19%
11846 4025 11498 6114 5538 39021 22%
17913 22718 27610 15299 19038 102578 59%
35008 31814 48997 27267 30799 173885
34086 29922 46984 24364 40587 175943
33247 29320 45240 23830 40002 171639 98%
4650 4072 1999 2223 1457 14401
302903 240619 558997 263144 438814 1804477 17%
737435 218936 584813 263718 391811 2196713 21%
1121172 1513003 1537867 714982 1429817 6316841 61%
2161510 1972558 2681677 1241844 2260442 10318031
987932 747893 1114715 567975 822719 4241234 41%
2828 1262 1535 1089 3959 10673 6%
330 22 673 157 1377 2559
It is clear from the table that about 19% SC and 22% ST households have received the job cards which is proportionate to the total SC (19%) and ST (18%) population in the district. However, participation in works has slightly reduced to 17% for SC and 21% for ST and that for women is 41% as compared to men. The important aspect to be noted that only 6% families have completed 100 days of works during the reporting period. Similarly, the table below provides the information block-wise data on number of households demanded for job cards and the number of job cards issued; similarly, demand for employment vis--vis employment offered and provided to the families. One can also find the person-days of employment generated during the fiscal year 2009-10 and up to 30th June 2010 along with number of persons actually worked under NREGA. Employment Generated during the Year 2009-2010 up to the Month of June 2010
State : KARNATAKA District : RAICHUR No. of Registered Job Blocks Card House Persons Issued Hold DEVADURGA LINGSUGUR MANVI RAICHUR SINDHNUR Grand Total 37051 33096 50170 27869 32568 180754 151869 122477 207489 101494 107909 691238 35008 31814 48997 27267 30799 173885 Employment demanded House Hold 34086 29922 46984 24364 40587 175943 Persons 140474 116217 213366 86835 136077 692969 Employment offered House Hold 34086 29911 46984 24364 40587 175932 Persons 140474 116177 213366 86835 136077 692929 Employment Provided House Hold 33247 29320 45240 23830 40002 171639 Persons 136591 113357 204383 84801 133491 672623 Persondays 2161510 1972558 2681677 1241844 2260442 10318031 No. of filled Muster Roll 5328 3469 6707 2845 5131 23480 No. of Families Complete d 100 days 2828 1262 1535 1089 3959 10673 On going works 3136 2220 5244 1619 2973 15192
.4
No. of Disabled beneficiary individuals
S.No
Cumulative No. of HH issued job cards (Till the reporting month)
167 69 1228 163 111 1738
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Journey of Janakalyan through NREGA

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 has been considered across the globe as one of the best plan ever made by Indian planners; one can see the physical as well as financial progress on the government website exclusively meant for it. But the reality is something else remained as open-secret that nobody is ready to talk about. There are many questions that arise in ones mind Are the objectives set by it achieving? Are the benefits reaching to the real target groups? What are the practical problems in making it fruitful? What are the feelings of implementing authorities? What the newly elected Gram Panchayat members are expecting from NREGA? What the communities feel about this beautifully designed project? How the officers are making undue advantages from the project? And several other questions are bothering everybody but remained unanswered. Efforts have been put to find answers to some of these questions while implementing the SDTT supported Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive assets for the farming communities project in 3 GP of Sindhanur taluk of Raichur district. This report is prepared at the end of the project period and documented the progress achieved during February 2010 to March 2011. Objectives of the project: With the support of SDTT, Janakalyan initiated an intervention in 3 GP of Sindhanur taluk to leverage NREGA funds for creation of productive assets to secure livelihoods of farming communities in February 2010. Objectives of this innovative intervention is toa. To empower community skills to articulate their needs (issues), demand for deserved rights under NREGA, prepare plan (using micro-planning tool) and lead its implementation to help themselves b. To support community action to make effective use of NREGA funds for creation of irrigation and soil health improvement assets through community capacity building initiatives c. To make agriculture profit-oriented to make the lives and livelihoods of communities Sustainable
.5
Problems of tail-end farmers and Solutions through NREGA

Raichur is an agriculturally predominant district and almost 73% of the total working population is directly dependent on agriculture as their source of livelihoods. At the same time, the asset-base of the district is very poor, especially the productive assets required to improve the agricultural productivity. The following table gives some basic information about the dependency of the district on agriculture for their livelihoods. AGRICULTURE DEPENDENCY Major Occupations / livelihood Options of the People of Raichur District NonWorking Population Total working Population Cultivator Agricultural Household Other Services population laborers activities 937000 206680 328491 14473 183118 1669762 56% 28% 45% 2% 25% On one hand, the livelihood analysis of demographic data depicts that about 45% of total population of Raichur is agricultural wage-earners, who needs additional employment (1st objective of NREGA) while another 28% of the population is cultivators, who needs the durable and productive agricultural assets to secure their livelihoods (2nd objective of NREGA). On the other hand, the NREG Act, 2005 set the dual objectives to address both these issues of providing additional employment as well as creating durable productive assets using the same amount of funds as under1. To provide livelihood security to the households in rural areas by providing not less than 100 (one hundred) days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household, whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled and manual work. 2. Creation of durable assets and strengthening the livelihood resource base of rural poor. This means, a penny spent shall bring double benefits to the people for whom the scheme is meant for. The wage-earners shall get employment while the farmers shall get the durable productive assets to improve agriculture productivity. However, the tail end farmers have some peculiar problems to optimize their productivity. These problems are of special cadre and thus need special attention to resolve. To state some of these problems are1. Inadequate Irrigation water: Hardly 20% of the land is irrigated and 15% land is used intensively (more than one crop per year) which is very bad in the present context (after green revolution). 2. Salinity & alkalinity: About 10-20% of the land in the low-lying areas is saline & alkaline, where nothing can be grown. Choking of drainage line & use of water from the drainage lines (which drains the water from upper reach farms leached out water) are the major reasons for salinity & alkalinity. 3. Chemical-heavy farming leading to degraded soil fertility and thus least productivity: Overdoses of chemicals left the residues in the soil degrading the soil fertility over a period of time. Therefore, the productivity has gone down to any extent. Lack of biomass and litters in the farms has also contributed to soil degradation. 4. Undeveloped land: There is still lot of lands belonging to the bottom strata of the society which have not been developed so far. 5. Lack of connectivity: Physical connectivity of the land to the residential areas is very poor causing problem for timely transportation of inputs (causing reduction in yield) as well as produces (causing post harvest losses). Further, the farmer cannot even think of going for high-income crops which are perishable in nature.
.6
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Now, if we look at the priorities of NREGA as stated below, all these above 5 problems of tail end farmers could easily be addressed by NREGA. The focus of the Scheme shall be on the following works in their order of priority: 1. Water conservation and water harvesting. 2. Drought proofing (including afforestation and tree plantation). 3. Irrigation canals, including micro and minor irrigation works. 4. Provision of irrigation facility to land owned by households belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes or to land of beneficiaries of land reforms or that of the beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojana of the Government of India program 5. Renovation of traditional water bodies including de-silting of tanks. 6. Land development 7. Flood control and protection works, including drainage in waterlogged areas. 8. Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access. 9. Any other work, which may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with the State Government. In order to ensure that the adequate investments under Employment Guarantee Scheme are channelized for plantation programs, a minimum of 20% of the value of works taken up in a Village shall be on plantation program. Roads can be taken up as last priority not exceeding 10% of the value of all the works. A comparative statement below shows how the problems of tail end farmers could be addressed by NREGA priorities. Sl. Problems of Tail end farmers NREGA priorities which can address the issues of tail end No. problems 1 Inadequate irrigation water Water conservation and water harvesting (Priority-1) and Provision of irrigation facility (Priority-4): By excavating farmponds to store rainwater during rainy season and use for life-saving irrigation during peak season 2 Salinity and alkalinity Drainage in waterlogged areas (Priority-7): Sub-surface drainage as well as open drainage and widening / deepening of natural drainage canal could resolve this problem 3 Chemical-heavy farming leading Drought proofing including afforestation and tree plantation to degraded soil fertility and thus (Priority-2): By increasing biomass contents of the soil, the fertility least productivity could be improved. 4 Undeveloped land Land Development (Priority-6): Develop all undeveloped land using NREGA funds for the poor farmers 5 Lack of connectivity Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access (Priority-8): Make/repair the connecting roads to the land to transport the inputs as well as produces to make agriculture profit-making The above table clearly depicts that NREGA could be a boon to the tail end farmers, especially for the farmers of this part of the country, provided the scheme is implemented in its true spirit. What is happening in reality is something different and in this context, Janakalyan initiated this intervention with a hope to sensitize the PRI members, government officers and communities to make its best use.
Final Report (February 2010 March 2011) .7

Part I
Progress Achieved
(February 2010 March 2011) This document is prepared at the end of the project period and documented the efforts of Janakalyan through NREGA (February 2010 to March 2011). Efforts have been made to report as per the budget line items from the approved program list in the subsequent sections of the report. 1.1 Sensitization Campaign for 3 tiers PRI members: It is an important activity in order to make the program successful; unless and until the implementing authorities are convinced about the importance of these asset-building activities, it would become extremely difficult. Therefore, utmost care is taken to implement these set of activities and many rounds of scheduling and rescheduling is being done to see to it that, the team does not complete the activities for the sake of completing these tasks and achieving the target. Yet, there are few activities which have been postponed time and again for the want of suitable time so that it bears desired impacts on the target groups for whom the activities are planned for and finally completed all the planned tasks with an additional time of 2 months. District Level Workshop: This was planned to be the first activity in the sequence but due to several reasons, it has remained as an incomplete activity, though planned several times during the reporting period. The major reasons are illustrated below Ear-end Target: The project was launched in February 2010 and all the district, block and village level officers including CEO, PD, DS etc were busy with achieving the March-end targets of exhausting their available budgets and thus they remained engaged throughout February, March and April 2010. Election Code of Conduct: Soon after completing the ear-ending target achieving activities, government declared election code of conduct and suspended all the activities. All the officers become busy with election process and engaged themselves until end of election process. Therefore, the sensitization workshop for these officers is kept on postponing and finally the strategy was changed to meet each of them individually to orient and convince them about the complementary approach to make NREGA provisions used for productive agriculture assets. 1.1.2 Taluk Level Workshop: Several efforts were initiated to convene the taluk level workshop during the year but due to the same reasons as stated above, this task also remained incomplete till midyear; however, with similar strategies, we could took the PRI members and officers into confidence in addition to the local MLA. But in the month of February 2011, a big event was organized at Janakalyan Samarthya Soudha on 17th February 2011 wherein the Executive Officer, Taluka Panchayat participated along with all his line departments and PRI members. More than 300 farmers from the project villages also participated in the program. A Government-Community Interface was created between the officers and farmers and there were huge number of questions posed to the PRI members as well as government officers. Finally, the EO had to agree to incorporate the asset building activities in the Annual Action Plan. Orientation to the newly elected PRI members: It was planned to expose the Gram Panchayat members who really want to do some good works under NREGA to few Gram Panchayats where
An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives .8
1.1.1
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
extraordinary works have been done by the GP members with cooperation of communities; but lately realized that there is hardly any such GP where productive agriculture assets have been created by PRI members initiative. However, several training has been conducted during the quarter in order to keep their tempo on. The details are furnished in the table belowSl. No 1. 2 3 Gram Panchayat ALABANUR BADARLI MADASIRWAR GP members of these villages Alabanur, Belagurki, Kannari, Maladinni Camp, R.B. Camp Haretanur, Gonniganur, Valabellary, Hedaginal, Badarli, Timmapura, R.H.No-5, Ginaivar Budihal, Madasirwar, Udbal EJ, Gomarci Dates of Training 27-8-2010 2-9-2010 5-9-2010 No of participants 29 16 14
Orientation to government staffs at various levels: Government officials play an important role in making the program successful & therefore several rounds of training and orientation has been conducted to take the government officers into confidence. Several rounds of one-to-one interactions have also been done during the quarter.
Sl. No 1. 2. GP Level Secretary & PDO Venue Taluk Panchayat Sindhanur Zilla Panchayat Raichur Dates of Training 4-10-2010
JE, AE, AEE, EO & CEO & other staff responsible 4-10-2010 & for NREGA implementation 16-10-2010 One-to-One interactions Sl. Meeting Date of Janakalyan staff Outcomes No. with meeting 3 MLA Basavarajaiah & 7-9-2010 & Agreed to resolve the problems shortly and Discuss the Pranab Bala 23-9-2010 matter calling the taluka level staff & ensure works are started soon. 4 CEO Basavarajaiah & 3-9-2010 & Told about pressure coming from people and from their Pranab Bala 5-9-2010 Principal secretary, shown the staff allocation status & promised to start work urgent. 5 PD Basavaraj & 8-10-2010 Agreed to start work & shown the budget copy Ms.Manjushree & 9-11-10 6 EO Basavarajaiah 3-11-2010, Agreed to visit our GPs shortly along with PDO and start Pranab & 5-12-2010, works. Resolve all problems. Ms.Manjushree 2-2-2011

1.1.3 Gram Panchayat Level Workshop: The newly elected Gram Panchayat members orientation program was conducted on 27.6.2010 at Janakalyan Office wherein about 49 newly elected Gram Panchayat members from Newly elected GP members training 17 villages of 3 Gram Panchayats participated in the orientation meeting. The daylong meeting introduced the salient features of NREGA followed by the issues of tail end farmers and how these could be addressed through the involvement of PRI members. The contents of the training in brief are listed below while the detailed power point presentation could be viewed following the link. Major topics covered are1. Orientation on NREGA and its salient features: a. Objectives of NREGA 2005 and its relevance to our present context. b. Five non-negotiable in execution of the Act c. Thirteen RIGHTs and Entitlements of the wage-earners and farmers provided under the Act d. Procedure for registration and issue of job cards e. Procedure for application and allotment of works f. Procedure to claim for unemployment allowance g. Permitted TYPEs of works in their order of priority and how these could create durable productive assets for farmers in addition to creating employment for the wage-earners. h. Planning of shelf of works and its approval as well as execution procedure with responsible officers. 2. Orientation on the Project: at the end of the day, we havea. established the fact that our communities are solely dependent on agriculture using the government data and how provisions of NREGA could help us to improve our livelihood conditions. b. analyzed the factors contributing to make agriculture loss-making in our context, discussed about the alternate options available and how provisions of NREGA could overcome all these factors with their active participation. c. set the objectives of our intervention and defined the roles that each of the stakeholders (including PRI members) need to play in order to secure the livelihoods using best use of the NREGA provisions. 3. Way out and role of PRI: At the end of the day, the participants also agreed the followinga. The PRI members including the Presidents/ Vice-presidents present in the workshop convinced that lack of political will among the elected representatives is the sole reason for present status of the scheme.
An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives . 10
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
b. Though, all the members had their own reservation about the project, finally they agreed to work as per our plan at least for year and if they get desired results / response, they would continue in future too. c. Each of the present members then agreed to take up at least few asset-creating during the year as per our priorities and set a target for themselves. Newly elected GP members of Madasirwar GP Questions of GP members: All the members have same set of questions which were asked repeatedly during the orientation workshop; some of them are listed below If you implement NREGA activities through people, how about our percentage share? The amount that we have already spent in getting elected as GP members, how do we recover the same? If you dont allow us to use machineries in executing the works, it Newly elected GP members of Alabanur GP would be difficult for us to recover our investment in next one year. All these questions were answered and the newly elected GP members were requested that you have been elected for 5 years; use the 1st year for the cause of the communities and if the community does recognize your service, next 4 years you can recover your investment. Lets invest this one year to make our GP as model GP in the state so that others recognize our efforts. The members were then convinced and finally each GP member agreed to take up at least 4-5 activities under our heads in the Newly elected GP members of Badarli GP next one year. 1.2 Empowering communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning tools: This set of activities is the most important activities in whole project and therefore due care is taken care while implementing these activities. Since, the orientation activities for the government functionaries and elected representatives were not possible in the 1 st quarter of the program,
.11

community empowerment activities were completed during 1st quarter itself to facilitate asset building activities through peoples participation. 1.2.1 Gram Sabha in villages: Apart from the 1st set of gram sabha that were conducted to orient the communities about the project in the beginning of the project, the team has conducted many rounds of gram sabha in each of the project villages. These gram sabha were to discuss various issues arouse from time to time in implementing the project activities and come up with the solutions to the respective issues. Though, there are still issues in bringing the whole community together on this issue, but we have succeeded to create a small pressure group among the villagers. Subsequent rounds of gram sabha in the villages also discussed many issues related to NREGA and its implementation. Janakalyan team also created AIG (Agriculture Interest Groups) in these villages and WEG (Wage Earners Group) to create pressure groups for the government as well as PRI members. The details of Gram Sabha these gram sabha are annexed to this report as Annex-I. Situation Analysis: Situation analysis is an exercise done with the participating farmers to understand their own village scenario (especially the agriculture scenario) using participatory tools. An effort was put to understand the village situation and context in which we are intervening to make agriculture profit-making through NREGA support. The summary is furnished in Annex-II.
1.2.2
. 12
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Problems in growing crops in these villages: The Janakalyan team has also tried to understand the factors contributing failure of crop or bottlenecks in cultivating various crops in these villages through situation analysis exercise. Major among these are1. intermittent dry spells between 2 rains 2. lack of connectivity with the lands 3. inadequate irrigation water available for these farmers 4. over dozes of chemical fertilizers and pesticides has degraded soil fertility to any extent 5. salinity and alkalinity caused due to water logging condition of the soil 6. recent flood has broken the farm bunds, deposited silt and eroded the top fertile soil from the land in the river banks 7. lack of proper marketing facility 8. inefficient functioning of Krishi Vigyan Kendra and Raita Sampark Kendra caused inadequate percolation of information to the farmers 9. migration of laborers to the nearby cities in search of employment 10. lack of complete scientific & latest knowledge about any crop among the farmers Whether NREGA can address these issues? Most of the above problems could be addressed, if the NREGA is implemented in a systematic manner. 1. drainage of waterlogged, saline and alkaline areas; 2. farm pond to harvest runoff and resolve irrigation issue; 3. de-silting of land, bunding, flood control measures, etc. to bring land to the original condition; 4. providing connecting road to the land 5. promotion of AIGs in the villages and making them aware about scientific know-how about the crops 6. implementation of labor-oriented activities to bring migrated population back to the villages 7. sensitizing the newly elected PRI members to take up productive assets creating activities
.13

1.2.3 Micro Planning: Micro-planning is an exercise to empower the communities to identify their issues related to farming, preparing proposal in NREGA terms to get these issues resolved, approving it in the gram sabha and submitting these proposals to GP to get sanctioned under NREGA. Actual implementation of the project starts with micro-planning. The details of the micro-planning exercise completed during the reporting period are furnished in the table belowSl. No. 1 2. 3. 4. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Name of the village Male Female Alabanur Belagurki Kannari Maladinni Camp Gonniganur Valaballary Hedaginal Madasirwar Udbhal Budihal Gomarsi Ginivar BR Camp RH No5 Haretanur Badarli Timmapur 56 41 41 20 22 35 96 26 24 41 50 45 30 50 40 40 50 02 02 06 00 00 00 01 00 03 Participants in the micro-planning exercise Number SC ST Opinion GP Farmer Labors of works Leaders member 5 10 10 2 30 18 40 10 9 2 3 20 25 78 10 9 2 3 20 25 78 07 2 1 17 17 40 7 4 5 1 20 10 25 10 12 5 3 25 20 88 35 20 8 3 50 60 144 7 10 4 1 20 22 82 10 5 1 20 10 38 25 4 6 35 20 90 20 3 3 36 14 60 18 08 2 3 24 21 65 02 02 2 2 20 10 30 5 3 30 20 40 20 10 2 2 20 20 50 15 08 3 3 30 10 60 15 10 3 2 30 20 45
Process followed in conducting micro-planning: A day-long training to the employees was conducted to orient them how to do micro-planning in the villages. A set of formats were developed to identify various works to be taken up under NREGA in the villages and also a reporting format
. 14
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
for micro-plan report. The following methodology was adopted in each village to complete the micro-planning exercise. 8.00 - 10.00 Meeting opinion leaders, PRI & SHG members, youths & others in village 10.00 - 16.00 General information collection transect walk 17.00 - 19.00 Introduction of NREGA, our project and gram sabha 19.00 - 20.00 Planning for tomorrow 08.00 - 09.00 Selection of Agriculture interested people 07.00 - 10.00 Social Map 10.00 - 12.00 Resource Map 12.00 - 13.30 FGD to identify the needs and classification 15.00 - 17.00 Estimated budget preparation 17.00 - 19.00 Draft action plan preparation 19.00 - 21.00 Approval of draft action plan in the gram sabha
Day 2 Day 1
.15

Productive agriculture asset creating activities: The following table provides the information regarding the farmers those who wants productive agriculture assets out of NREGA fundsSl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Village Alabanur Belagurki Kannari Maladinni Camp R.B. Camp Budihal Madasirwar Udbal EJ Gomarsi Haretanur Gonniganur Valabellary Hedaginal Badarli Timmapura R.H.No-5 Ginaivar Date of microplanning 22,23-04-10 24,25-04-10 30,01-05-10 26,27-04-10 29,30-04-10 27,28-04-10 25,26-04-10 20,21-04-10 02,03-05-10 22,23-04-10 20,21-04-10 18,19-04-10 29,30-04-10 01,02-05-10 03,04-05-10 All Works requested by villagers 80 82 43 28 18 92 107 44 41 22 80 123 45 60 17 Farm pond 3 54 8 1 2 5 2 5 17 1 6 13 19 32 Number of works identified Flood Drainage Plantation control 33 4 28 4 6 16 22 2 10 27 2 6 7 39 2 14 41 2 22 10 8 13 07 17 8 13 14 60 3 3 100 10 30 18 4 54 17 7 6 12 6 1 Land Bund 10 7 3 2 4 15 4 1 4 3 3 2 7 8 -
Major types of works: The major works identified by the team during the micro-planning exercise in the villages are furnished belowSl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Village Alabanur Belagurki Kannari Maladinni Camp R.B. Camp Budihal Madasirwar Udbal EJ Gomarci Haretanur Gonniganur Valabellary Hedaginal Badarli Timmapura R.H.No-5 Ginivar
Total
Farm pond No Amtount

3 54 8 1 2 5 2 5 17 1 6 13 19 32 816000 48000 288000 624000 912000 1536000 150000 2700000 384000 48000 96000 240000 96000 240000
No
33 4 22 27 6 39 41 10 07 13 60 100 18 17 12
Drainage Amount
600000 1800000 2100000 3800000 42000000
Plantation Flood control Road No Amount No Amount Km Amount

800000 28 24000 16 320000 10 80000 400000 120000 14 80000 22 1200000 13 1600000 8 280000 200000 3 480000 30 200000 54 800000 6 320000 1 500000 10000000 15000000 100000 8000000 19 1024000 12 1000000 2200000 1400000 6 2 8 9 1 8 6 7 4 960000 720000 840000 480000 1680000 1920000 2280000 1680000 720000 240000 960000 3360000 1080000 300000 600 800 200 300 200 -
3000000 2000
800000 1000
1600000 28
1200000 3000 800000 4000 1100000 55000000 22000000 12000000 700 500 600 800
80000000 1200 20000000 2000
800000 14 80000 16
168
8178000 409
246200000 17900
6904000 205
41704000 28 17220000
There was huge demand for the asset-creating activities by the farmers when they realized this is the only scheme which can really secure their livelihoods. It was really difficult by Janakalyan team
. 16
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
to manage the demands of the farmers. The work estimates crossed few millions while the provision per fiscal year cannot cross hundred thousands rupees. Reactions of elected representatives: Though the communities expressed their happiness to our project but the PRI members are not so happy. However, we could mobilize their supports in some of the villages; most of them participated because their period is over and they are not sure that they will again get elected in the present election.
1.3
Implementation of shelf of works to generate employment and create productive agriculture assets through communities: Achievement of the project objectives could be possible only with this set of activities. While most of the planning and preparatory activities were completed in 1st and 2nd quarters of the project period, the 3rd quarter was completely dedicated for execution NREGA shelf of works and demonstration of farm based activities. The team had an apprehension that the agricultural operations and monsoon might come in their way in execution of these shelf of activities while never calculated the big hurdle that government might suspend implementation of all NREGA activities during 3rd quarter.
.17

Plan of action to create productive agriculture assets: The micro plans prepared by the Janakalyan team with the communities was reorganized as per the requirement of the government in the prescribed format and got the approval of the newly elected Gram Panchayat members and then placed before the government for approval. The Taluk Sl. Name of Gram Budget Approved (in Lakh) (Intermediate) Panchayat has also recommended this shelf of No. Panchayat 125.75 works to District Panchayat and the District Panchayat has 1 Alabanur 2 Badarli 154.00 withhold its approval citing a reason that the Annual Action 3 Madsirwar 93.74 Plan had already been approved by the Government; 373.49 Total however, at the end of the year, if any of the activities form the approved lists is dropped, then these can be taken up. Further, the CEO also suggested that many of these activities proposed in our microplans have also are common in the government approved list, which can be implemented immediately with Janakalyan cooperation. CEO told that payment for many of the works completed last year to mitigate flood affects were pending due to lack of funds and also incomplete NMR; all such works have been included in the current Annual Action Plan which have been approved and have been uploaded in MIS. Preparation at Higher level: in order to execute the shelf of works several efforts are made throughout the project period to convince the government officers at GP, TP and ZP levels that our intervention is to create productive assets for the farmers by leveraging funds from NREGA. The workshops at GP, TP and ZP levels yielded no results. The action plan approved by the government for 3 GP of our operational area could be summarized as presented in the table.
Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Work approved as per NREGA priorities Water conservation and water harvesting Drought proofing (including afforestation and tree plantation) Irrigation canals including micro and minor irrigation works Provision of irrigation facility to SC/ST/IAY beneficiaries Renovation of traditional water bodies including de-silting of tanks Land development
Flood control & protection works including drainage in waterlogged areas
Rural connectivity to provide all-weather access Grand Total
Budget Approved for 2010-11 Alabanur Badarli Madasirwar Total 12.00 0.00 22.80 34.80 25.15 11.00 19.44 55.59 00.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 10.50 0.00 0.00 10.50 19.80 17.00 0.00 36.80 01.20 11.00 13.60 25.80 31.00 43.00 18.40 92.40 20.10 66.00 19.50 105.60 125.75 154.00 93.74 373.49
Though, these works were approved by government for 2010-11, with all our efforts and coordination with the executing authorities at Gram Panchayat and Intermediate Panchayat, we failed to take up a single work under NREGA till December 2010. The communities were on toes but we failed to meet their expectations too. The major reasons cited by the government officer are1) During the last (2009-10) year flood, lot of activities have been executed in all the Gram Panchayat of Raichur district which were not approved in last year Action Plan (beyond the approved budget by the Government of India); these activities have been officially approved during current year action plan and decided to make payment to the old GP Members during the current financial year while the newly elected GP members want to take up new works. Therefore, they are not taking up any work during the current but entering last year figures in the website. 2) The new GP members want to implement all the approved works as per the action plan while the old GP members, since they have invested in these works want their payment reimbursed
. 18
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
by the officers. Both the groups are right as well as wrong because most of the works have not been implemented by the old members but are claiming for payment, thus the old members are at fault; similarly, some of the works have been implemented but was not paid and hence the new members are at fault. In this fight, the labor groups are the sufferers. 3) The conflict between old and new GP members is a problem difficult to resolve. One of the reasons is that most of the works which the old GP members are claiming for payment are either incomplete or not WEG Meeting executed at all while there are some genuine cases also. The new GP members want to conduct a systematic scrutiny and then make payment to the genuine works. 4) Election code of conduct was cited as the reason till last quarter while now their statement has changed. This problem exists not only in our project area but in all 164 GPs of Raichur districts. In fact the situation is too worst in few other GPs. Several rounds of public hearing and people protests at taluk and district level has been conducted by NGOs and people institutions. 1.3.1 Promote Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG): In order to execute the shelf of works systematically, we planned to promote AIGs in each of the project villages. The execution plan at the community level was modified as per the contexts arouse from time to time as under1) AIG: Initially it was planned that the work would be executed in the leadership of AIG and thus an AIG in each village was promoted with the farmers (who shall create productive assets in their farms), wage-earners who must get 100 days of work from the NREGA activities. The information about these AIGs has already been provided in previous volumes of our reports. Several rounds of capacity building interventions have been done for their empowerment in all respects of NREGA. The focus was on complementary approach.
2) WEG: When we realized that the complementary approach might not yield expected results during the year, the team decided to form Wage Earners Group (WEG) involving 50 wageearners from each village to create pressure groups for the government. About 9 such WEG has been promoted in 9 out of 17 villages. All the members of these WEG have been made aware about various aspects like job rights, benefits available under NREGA, roles of various stakeholders under NREGA and the Act itself through meetings, awareness camps and trainings. Pamphlets regarding NREGA and the list of works already approved in all the 3 GPs

in our project area along with budget details are also shared with these WEG members to provide clear knowledge, information and also to create demand for works. Some of these WEG has already submitted their job requests to respective GP. 3) Job Cards: In the month of August 2010, the government declared that all job cards registered till 31.3.2010 as null and void and as a consequence the bank accounts and all other related documents became useless. The reason cited by the government was that these job cards were made by GP members / staffs and therefore the families have never engaged themselves in NREGA works till 31.3.2010. Hence, to estimate real demand for NREGA works, government invited community to register themselves for job cards; they deleted registrations of all job cards and bank account, etc. from MIS. Therefore, Janakalyan team had to spent maximum time to provide hand holding support to the communities for registration of labors for job cards, open bank accounts, etc. because, without this basic ground work, labor groups can not demand for the jobs from GPs under NREGA. The interesting point to be noted here is that the job enrollment movement was supported by PRI members as well as GP officials because it complements their target achievement. Following is the data regarding new job card registrationSl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Villages ALBANOOR BELGURKI GONNIGNOOR KHANNARI MALDINNI Total: BADARLI GINIWAR HARATNUR HEDAGINAL TIMMAPUR VALA BALLARY Total: BUDIHAL GOMARSI KAGGAL (D) MADA SIRWAR UDBAL (J) Total: GRAN TOTAL No. of Registered HH Persons 459 1173 360 1164 119 297 206 569 49 118 1193 3321 453 1809 638 2287 728 2092 364 1756 330 1416 404 1840 2917 11200 492 1494 373 1048 0 0 408 1141 151 416 1424 4099 5534 18620 HH 78 106 4 18 2 208 34 71 29 124 52 34 344 75 50 0 97 36 258 810 SCs Persons 195 346 10 45 4 600 140 249 97 508 219 166 1379 215 123 0 286 107 731 2710 HH 58 109 14 31 12 224 220 33 256 69 85 76 739 25 0 0 7 0 32 995 STs Persons 146 360 39 88 29 662 860 101 861 360 387 320 2889 67 0 0 21 0 88 3639 HH 323 145 101 157 35 761 199 534 443 171 193 294 1834 392 323 0 304 115 1134 3729 Others Persons 832 458 248 436 85 2059 809 1937 1134 888 810 1354 6932 1212 925 0 834 309 3280 12271 Male 622 562 167 290 61 1702 915 1131 1100 869 689 928 5632 740 573 0 604 213 2130 9464 Female 551 602 130 279 57 1619 894 1156 992 887 727 912 5568 754 475 0 537 203 1969 9156
. 20
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Strengthening AIG and preparing them to execute the planned activities: To empower the AIG members on their rights and entitlements, several rounds of meeting and trainings are conducted during the reporting period; in addition, the team has also conducted in-house as well as out door technical training for the participating farmers. The details are presented in the table belowSl. Name of the AIG No. 1 Nandi Basava Krishi Samiti 2 Sri Devi Krishi Samiti 3 Sri Rama Krishi Samiti 4 Sri Maruthi Krishi Samithi 5 Sri Gajanana Krishi Samithi 6 Sri Nagalinga Krishi Samiti 7 Netravathi Krishi Samithi 8 Sri Basava Krishi Samiti 9 Sri Someshwara Krishi Samiti 10 Sangamanatha Krishi Samiti 11 Sri Maruthi Krishi Samithi 12 Channa Basava Krishi Samiti 13 Tunga Bhadra Krishi Samiti 14 Sri Ayyappa Krishi Samiti 15 Sri Shakthi Krishi Samiti 16 Sri Durga Krishi Samiti 17 Hasiru Krishi Samiti Village Alabanur Belagurki Kannari Maladinni Camp R.B. Camp Budihal Madasirwar Udbal EJ Gomarci Haretanur Gonniganur Valabellary Hedaginal Badarli Timmapura R.H.No-5 Ginaivar Dates of Meeting for each AIG 06-08-10 07-08-10 09-08-10 10-08-10 11-08-10 06-08-10 07-08-10 09-08-10 10-08-10 06-08-10 07-08-10 09-08-10 10-08-10 11-08-10 12-08-10 13-08-10 14-08-10 20-08-10 21-08-10 22-08-10 23-08-10 24-08-10 20-08-10 21-08-10 22-08-10 23-08-10 20-08-10 21-08-10 22-08-10 23-08-10 24-08-10 25-08-10 26-08-10 27-08-10 10-09-10 11-09-10 12-09-10 13-09-10 14-09-10 10-09-10 11-09-10 12-09-10 13-09-10 10-09-10 11-09-10 12-09-10 13-09-10 14-09-10 15-09-10 16-09-10 17-09-10 Date of Training 4-10-2010 4-10-2010 4-10-2010 4-10-2010 4-10-2010 5-10-2010 5-10-2010 5-10-2010 5-10-2010 6-10-2010 6-10-2010 6-10-2010 7-10-2010 7-10-2010 7-10-2010 6-10-2010 7-10-2010
In addition to the AIGs, the team has also promoted Wage Earners (labor) Groups (WEG) in 9 out of these 17 villages (meetings held but group yet to be formed in other villages); these labor groups were used as a tool to fight against the government as the complementary approach did not yield any results. The details of these labor groups are furnished in the table below and the list of members (group wise) is furnished in annexure-III.
Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Village # of groups 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Male 20 23 17 7 0 16 25 29 22 Alabanur Belagurki Kannari Maladinni Camp R.B. Camp Budihal Madasirwar Udbal EJ Gomarci Haretanur Gonniganur Valabellary Hedaginal Badarli Timmapura R.H.No-5 Ginivar Total Members Female 30 27 15 2 26 14 25 21 28 Date of formation # of meetings Total 50 50 35 9 26 30 50 50 50 14-9-2010 20-9-2010 16-9-2010 23-10-2010 17-10-2010 17-9-2010 14-9-2010 23-9-2010 24-9-2010 19-9-2010 15-10-2010 6-10-2010 12-9-2010 2-10-2010 4-10-2010 11-10-2010 27-9-2010 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 2
Thus, we have an additional force in each of these villages as pressure group for the government; both AIG and WEG would put pressure on the executing authorities for initiating work execution and provide employment.

1.3.2 Facilitation of asset building activities: As stated in the previous volumes of Quarterly Progress Reports that the project commenced in February 2010 and completed 14 months by now. The total project period is shown below for your referenceFeb 2010 Mar 2010 Apr May Jun Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan July 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 GP election Code of Conflict of old and NREGA Conduct; no new GP members implementatio EXECUTION TP/ZP election developmental work regarding work Code of n system implementation: ALL executed during OF NREGA conduct; changed: WORK EXECUTION 2009-10; SHELF OF SUSPENEDE recruitment of SUSPENDED suspended all ALL WORK PDOs in place WORKS THROUGHOUT new work EXECUTION of Secretary KARNATAKA execution GP election: 8.5.2010 TP/ZP election: 26.12.2010 President/VP election: 24.6.2010 President election: Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011
Ground works like promotion of AIG, microplan to identify the needs
EXECUTION OF NREGA SHELF OF WORKS
Effectively we had only 4 months (October-November 2010 and again February-March 2011) for execution of shelf of works approved by government for 2010-11 as clear from the above table. The major reasons1) February- March: The ground works were carried out to form AIG, prepare microplans to assess the needs of the communities. 2) April-June: Gram Panchayat election announced till election of GP President and Vicepresident: election code of conduct and hence suspended all works. 3) July: Government announced new system to replace Secretaries by PDO (Panchayat Development Officers) in each Gram Panchayat; due to handing-taking over the charges by newly recruited PDOs, no work execution took place. 4) August-September: The old GP members, who had lot of works in February-March in additional budget as flood measures but could claim payment in April due to announcement of election, submitted their claims. But the newly elected GP body declined their payment alleging that these works were either not executed or partially executed by the old GP members. The conflict was in whole Karnataka state and took lot of time to resolve the issue by the intervention of state level bureaucrats and finally resolved in September end. 5) October- November: Execution of approved shelf of works initiated and completed few works as furnished in the subsequent sections of the report. 6) December- January: The Intermediate and District Panchayat election announced and thus execution of works suspended due to election code of conduct again. Despite all these hurdles, the team could achieve most of the agreed tasks and the details are provided in the subsequent sections of the report. Budget Approved: Total approved budget of all 3 Gram Panchayat put together is Rs.3,75,48,800 while that for 4 asset-creating Earmarked Budget for different categories of works works is Rs.2,75,08,800 whereas Sector Alabanur Badarli Madasirwar our target is only Rs.2,02,50,000. Tree Plantation 2515000 1100000 1943800 Therefore, we were pretty sure of Connecting roads 2010000 6600000 1950000 accomplishing our target. The Land Development 120000 1100000 1360000 Water harvesting 4230000 2300000 2280000 highest budget is approved for Other Works 3800000 4300000 1940000 Badarli Gram Panchayat
Total Budget 12675000 15400000 9473800 An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives . 22
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
(Rs.1,54,00,000) followed by Alabanur GP (Rs.1,26,75,000) and lowest is for Madasirwar GP (Rs.94,73,800). The budget approved by the government for the year 2010-11 is grouped in 5 categories for our reporting convenience; 4 sectors representing the needs of the farmers to create productive agriculture assets and all other priorities of NREGA are grouped as other works. The maximum budget is earmarked for tree plantation in Alabanur GP, approach roads in Badarli GP, Land development in Madasirwar GP and water harvesting structures in Alabanur GP. The least fund is earmarked for tree plantation in Badarli GP, approach roads in Madasirwar GP, land development in Alabanur GP and water harvesting in Madasirwar GP. GP wise work allocation: The allocation of works in all these 3 Gram Panchayat of Sindhanur taluk are furnished in the table above and discussed as under. Alabanur: Maximum funds is earmarked for water harvesting structures (Rs.42,30,000) followed by tree plantation (Rs.25,15,000) and connecting road (Rs.20,10,000) and the least investment is for land development activities. About Rs.38,00,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA. Badarli: Similarly for Badarli GP, the maximum funds is earmarked for connecting road (Rs.66,00,000) followed by water harvesting structures (Rs.23,00,000) and Rs.11,00,000 each for land development and tree planning activities. About Rs.43,00,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA. Madasirwar: For Madasirwar GP, the maximum funds is earmarked for water harvesting structures (Rs.22,80,000) followed by connecting roads (Rs.19,50,000) and Rs.19,43,800 for tree planning while Rs.13,60,000 for land development activities. About Rs.19,40,000 is allocated for all other priorities of NREGA. Completed Works: With an additional time of 2 months (February-March 2011), Janakalyan team could complete almost all agreed tasks by mobilizing the communities; due to several reasons as stated above, the team failed to complete all the agreed tasks within the project period and thus sought an extension for 2 months (February-March 2011). The team is thankful to SDTT for providing an additional time to complete all the agreed tasks without any additional funding
.23

support. The summary of the completed shelf of works are tabulated below while details are annexed to this report in Annex-V. Summary of Works Completed under different target areas as per our commitment Sl. Alabanur Badarli Madsirwar Total Categories No Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. I Completed Works A Tree Plantation 0 0 0 0 B Connecting roads 1710000 6350000 1650000 9710000 C Land Development 10000 1100000 1140000 2250000 D Water harvesting 2000000 2300000 2280000 6580000 Sub total - Completed works 3720000 9750000 5070000 18540000 II To be completed by end of the project A Tree Plantation 2515000 1100000 1943800 5558800 B Connecting roads 300000 250000 300000 850000 C Land Development 110000 0 220000 330000 D Water harvesting 2230000 0 0 2230000 Sub total - to be completed works 5155000 1350000 2463800 8968800 Other works (not related to Janakalyan III target) 1 Completed works 2800000 4300000 1440000 8540000 2 To be completed 1000000 0 500000 1500000 Sub total - Other works 3800000 4300000 1940000 10040000 GRAND TOTAL - ALL WORKS 12675000 15400000 9473800 37548800 The work-wise details are attached in worksheets as Annex V to this report
. 24
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
.25
From the above table, it is clear that about Rs.1,85,40,000/- (91.56%) of the total target of Rs.2,02,50,000/- is accomplished despite all these hurdles during the project period. Though, we must agree that Janakalyan team could not involve physically in implementing all these works as many parallel work execution took place in each GP while we have only 1 GPO per GP; however, the planning was done by Janakalyan and the AIG / WEG members participated in these works, wherever our staff failed to make it. Many works have been implemented by direct supervision of our GPO in collaboration with GP members. Analysis of the works taken up under NREGA in 2010-11: It is clear from the following table that out of total works executed during the year under NREGA, more than 68% works are to create productive agriculture assets (water harvesting, land development, plantation and connecting roads) proposed by Janakalyan while rest 32% is for other works. Similarly, from the works those are approved by government and would be executed, the major share (about 86%) is again to create productive agriculture assets while only 14% would be related to other works.
. 26
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Analysis of the works keeping total budget of all 3 GP as the base during 2011 Sl. Alabanur Badarli Madsirwar Categories No. Rs. Rs. Rs. I Completed Works A Tree Plantation 0% 0% 0% B Connecting roads 26% 45% 25% C Land Development 0% 8% 18% D Water harvesting 31% 16% 35% Sub total - Completed works 57% 69% 78% II To be completed by end of the project period A Tree Plantation 41% 81% 66% B Connecting roads 5% 19% 10% C Land Development 2% 0% 7% D Water harvesting 36% 0% 0% Sub total - to be completed works 84% 100% 83% TOTAL - JANAKALYAN WORKS 70% 72% 80% III Other works of GP (not related to Janakalyan target) 1 Completed works 43% 31% 22% 2 To be completed 16% 0% 17% Sub total - Other thank Janakalyan works 30% 28% 20%
Total Rs.
0% 36% 8% 24% 68% 53% 8% 3% 21% 86% 73% 32% 14% 27%
Similarly, the above table depicts that only 27% of the total GP budget is earmarked for other works while 73% of the works are approved to create productive agriculture assets. Detailed study shows that about 80% of total approved budget is earmarked for asset building activities in Madsirwar while that in Badarli is 72% and in Alabanur is 70%. Analysis of the works for each GP: Similarly, if we analyze the works for each GP, we find that maximum works have been implemented in Badarli GP (63%) followed by Madsirwar (54%) and least is in Alabanur (29%); the total works completed so far in these 3 GPs for creating the productive agriculture assets is 49% while for other works is only 23%.
.27

Analysis of the works keeping total GP budget as the base during 2011 Sl. Alabanur Badarli Madsirwar Categories No. Rs. Rs. Rs. I Completed Works 0% 0% 0% A Tree Plantation 13% 41% 17% B Connecting roads 0% 7% 12% C Land Development 16% 15% 24% D Water harvesting 29% 63% 54% Sub total - Completed works II To be completed by end of the project period 20% 7% 21% A Tree Plantation 2% 2% 3% B Connecting roads 1% 0% 2% C Land Development 18% 0% 0% D Water harvesting 41% 9% 26% Sub total - to be completed works III Other works of GP (not related to Janakalyan target) 22% 28% 15% 1 Completed works 8% 0% 5% 2 To be completed 30% 28% 20% Sub total - Other works Total Rs.
0% 26% 6% 18% 49% 15% 2% 1% 6% 24%
23% 4% 27%
The maximum works undertaken for land development activities is in Madsirwar GP (12% of their completed works), for water harvesting activities is in Madsirwar GP (24% of their completed
. 28
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
works) and for connecting road is in Badarli GP (41% of their completed works). However, out of the completed works of all 3 GPs, the highest investment has gone for connecting roads (26%) followed by water harvesting structures (18%) and least is for land development (6%). Tree plantation has remained zero because the work execution started after the monsoon and thus still none of the works have yet been taken up under this category; however, as per the official records, all these activities have been completed and payment has been made. As discussed in the earlier paragraphs, Janakalyan has identified 4 areas of productive agriculture asset creation by leveraging funds from NREGA. The following figure depicts that, tree plantation has not been taken up at all (0%) as it is a seasonal intervention but the

period when this activity shall have been taken up (July-Sep) was spent in the conflict between the old and new GP members. It is also clear from the figure that maximum investment has gone into approach road from the village to the farms in all the 3 GPs. Water harvesting structures have also been created but relatively less than other works while investment for land development is least among all 4 components.
Works yet to be executed: If we analyze the works that are already approved and remained incomplete, we find maximum investment would be for tree plantation followed by water harvesting structure and then connecting roads while land development would find least investment.
. 30
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
.31

GP-wise work execution: The GP-wise execution could be analyzed using the following pie charts. It is clear from all the 3 GPs that maximum investment has gone into connecting roads followed by water harvesting structures.
Conclusion: To conclude the above discussion one can say that, total commitment of Janakalyan during the project period was about Rs.2,02,50,000/- while we have already accomplished Rs.1,85,40,000/- (91.56%) despite several hurdles during the reporting period. The team is very happy with the achievements during the reporting period despite all these hurdles but has learnt lots of lessons from experiences / hurdles, which shall be our assets for the future period of intervention. Moreover, all the elections starting from lower tier of PRI to District PRI, MLA/MP are completed during the year and therefore we will not face any such difficulties in the next 3 years. Therefore, keeping the learning in mind, we are sure to do more good works to create productive agricultural assets for the farmers of the region and come up with a replicable model to leverage NREGA funds for the benefits of the farming communities.
Major problems encountered in executing planned works: Execution of approved NREGA works by Janakalyan team is not an easy task in the present environment and systems adopted by the government in implementation of the activities. The elected representatives as well as government machineries have their own stakes in execution of these shelves of works and
. 32
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
therefore dont entertain interference by any external persons/institutions like ours. Some of the problems we have faced while executing these sets of shelves of works under NREGA are The communities themselves are not interested to get the works done in their field (especially the individual benefits like water harvesting structure, land development works or tree plantation) but simply want the amount paid to them (whatever amount they get after paying the percentage of share to all persons associated in finalizing the bills and getting it released). The newly elected PRI members, who have invested lot of funds to get elected this year, have so far not been able to get any works implemented due to various reasons stated in our previous volumes of the reports; also part of the approved budget has been shared with the old PRI members and therefore, initially showed reluctance in implementing the works, especially with the cooperation of Janakalyan since our team insists for true implementation. However, finally agreed to cooperate for the works which directly benefits the farmers to create productive assets only. The concerned officers at various levels though express their full support whenever our team meets them, but creates all sorts of difficulties while making payment for the executed works to discourage the farmers / wage-earners. This was the major problem as if the payment for one activity is delayed then our team finds extreme difficulty in mobilizing the wage-earners / farmers to participate in subsequent works.
Our anticipation in the beginning of the program about the policy level problem as a hurdle to complete the works in time was the most important cause for failure to initiate execution of the works. The government took a decision to reject all old job cards and requested people for fresh registration for job cards with their family and individual photos of all who wants to work under NREGA. With this decision coming into force, we had no eligible labors as per the Act and thus had start from zero with facilitation of the labor groups for job card registration and
.33

bank account opening. This consumed our whole quarter for entire team with negligible results as the community has really lost faith in the scheme. When we engaged ourselves in this ground work, the conflict between OLD & NEW GP members reached peak. The old group wants their payment for approved (executed in last financial year) works while the new group demands for execution of all works as per the approved plan. Finally, none of the works has been implemented in any of the GP till September 2010. The micro-plans prepared by Janakalyan team involving all sections of the community and old GP members was withhold at ZP level, the interest of AIG members and other people to whom we had trained started diminishing. The team failed to sustain the motivation level of these trained people despite several efforts. The wage rate of project area in agriculture operations is very high compared to that of NREGA and thus getting labor during crop-season (July-February) is difficult; however, in offseason (March-June) the labors are available in plenty.
Strategies adopted to execute NREGA works: The notable strategies adopted in order to get these works executed to create productive agriculture assets are Complementary approach adopted to ensure the planned activities are implemented with their cooperation. Taking the elected representative into confidence and implementing the shelf of works in their leadership. A meeting of all the officers from all 3 tiers of PRI system in the chairmanship of the local MLA to give them an impetus is conducted in August 2010; it was expected that this would help us to get the support and cooperation of the elected representative as well as PRI members. AIG / WEG were the central force to implement the shelf of activities planned under NREGA. Labor groups are made aware by organizing meeting, training & sharing materials. The works approved for 2010-11 is shared among all labor groups and made aware about the works planned in NREGA during this year. Labor groups are facilitated to register for job cards and apply for job allotment to GPs. Lot of pressure is created through labor groups at taluka and district level by NGOs and labor unions and other people institutions. Many rounds of individual interactions with the beneficiaries for whom the works have been approved followed by focused group discussion to make them understand the importance of these productive agriculture assets with the following reasoningWith these productive assets, they would derive the benefits for years and also for their next generations, in terms of increased productivity. The benefits would be multiplied year after year. If they do not create these assets this time but simply get percentage of money, they would never be able to create these assets in future, as government would not allow them to get the same benefits in future. PRI members are convinced to cooperate with the concept that If you support the farmers to create these productive assets, they would remember you as long as the structure remains with them while for the common infrastructure like village road, etc. nobody recognizes you. The approved budget for the productive agriculture assets is part of the total budget where we are seeking your cooperation and not for all other activities.
. 34
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
In the whole nation, nobody has done work on this model of productive agriculture assets creation with NREGA funds and thus whole nation would recognize this model and also all of you once we prove this as a replicable model. The officers of various levels responsible for execution of the NREGA works are convinced with the motivating factors likeOut of 164 GPs of the district (34 in Sindhanur taluk), we are requesting you all to support us to create these 3 GPs as model GP so that we can give a model to the whole nation; definitely, as executing agency, the officers like you will be recognized by whole nation. 1.3.3 Implementation of SRI: As clear from our previous quarterly progress reports (Volume I, II, III & IV), all these asset creating works have been implemented only during OctoberNovember & February-March due to election code of conduct and conflict between old and new GP members. As per our original plan, the demonstration of agriculture components should have been taken up with the farmers for whom the agricultural assets such as irrigation tank, drainage, land leveling is undertaken by the project. Since, our efforts were concentrated on such asset creating works, we lost few months of kharif season and then realized that the asset creation might go beyond the kharif crop. Therefore, the team identified interested farmers among AIGs who have assured sources of irrigation at least for part of their farm and initiated the demonstration of agricultural technologies such as SRI, IFS and high yielding crops. Therefore, though we will not be able to measure the exact outputs and outcomes of the project for agriculture components, the expenditure, yield and income data are documented from time to time which are furnished here.
.35
Though, these demonstrations do not exhibit the benefits of the assets created by leveraging funds from NREGA, but since these are complete in themselves, the farmers have realized the importance of such technologies. It is worth mentioning here that without assured irrigation, we can neither demonstrate the benefits of SRI nor the vegetable cultivation; but even then the farmers have got good yield and realized that SRI, vegetable cultivation and IFS are very relevant systems of cultivation in the present context for this region. There was lot of hesitation towards adoption of SRI and thus there was very poor response too in the beginning; however, some of the participating farmers have now realized its importance and are ready to adopt it during next cropping year too. They found nothing important in IFS as many of the farmers has been doing it for years; however, the IFS package that Janakalyan propagates is tank-based and thus the farmers did not realize its importance during the year. It would be demonstrated again with the farmers having tanks in the next cropping year. Vegetable cultivation was a new addition to this area and farmers have got the taste during the year and we are sure they would definitely adopt it in the years to come as part of their regular farming activities.
. 36
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Though we have documented details about the expenditures, yield and return from these demonstration plots, but we dont have any benchmark to compare the results as this is the first year we have introduced the program with these farmers. Therefore, we do not have the records of their previous year and hence cannot compare the data of the year with that of previous year. However, we can definitely make analysis of the data against the expenditures that with the return. Further, some of the farmers have also shared that the yield is more than that of previous year, but there are few others who have also mentioned that the return has reduced from that of previous year. The details of these experiments are tabulated below for your ready reference.
Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Name of the farmer Venkatesh Allabhaksha Mallikarjuna Mudakappa Channabasava Chidanandappa Basappa Yamanapp Adeppa Pralladh Girija Veeresh Basavanagouda Mali Earanagouda Murada Basappa G Hanmanthappa Village Hediginal Hediginal Valabellary Giniwar Badarli Haretanur Goniganur Goniganur Thimmapur RH C No.5 Udbal Udbal Gomarci Gomarci Budiwal Mad-Sirwar Gram Panchayat Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Crop grown Bengal gram/Sorgham Sorgham/Bengal gram Sorgham/Bengal gram Bengal gram/Sorgham Sorgham/Bengal gram Sorgham/Bengal gram Bengal gram/Sorgham Bengal gram/Sorgham Bengal gram/Sorgham Bengal gram/Sorgham Sorgham/Bengal gram Sorgham/Bengal gram Sorgham/Bengal gram Bengal gram/Sorgham Sorgham/Bengal gram Bengal gram/Sorgham Total Average Per acre Area Data from Demonstration Plot Net (ha) Expenditure Yield Rate Return Profit 3.5 3200 11200 6500 0.4 4700 2.5 3500 8750 5975 0.4 2775 3.0 3000 9000 6100 0.4 2900 4.0 3100 12400 7600 0.4 4800 3.0 2900 8700 6300 0.4 2400 3.0 3000 9000 6350 0.4 2650 4.0 2900 11600 7600 0.4 4000 3.5.0 3000 10500 6400 0.4 4100 4.0 2800 11200 6950 0.4 4250 4.0 3000 12000 7750 0.4 4250 3.0 3200 9600 7100 0.4 2500 4.5 2900 13050 10550 0.4 2500 3.0 2800 8400 5750 0.4 2650 4.0 3100 12400 8350 0.4 4050 4.5 2900 13050 10450 0.4 2600 3.0 2900 8700 4500 0.4 4200 55325 56.5 48200 169550 114225 6.4 3458 4.0 3013 10597 7139 0.40 8645 9.0 7531 26492 17848 1.00
It is clear from the table above that, by investing an amount of Rs.8645 per acre, the farmer has received a net return of Rs.17848 by adopting SRI approach during the year. 1.3.4 Implement LEISA with IIFS: Some of the AIG members have taken up IIFS activities in their farms i.e. diversified cropping system during the kharif season. But, all the components of the IIFS were not possible during the current year as the farmers do not have the farm ponds. Regular field visits by the staffs as well as providing all necessary technical supports from time to time to the farmers was important strategy during the year.
.37

The expenditure, yield, return and net profit is documented in the following tableSl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Name of the farmer Ramachandra Naganagouda Earanna Amaregouda Rajashekhar K Devendrappa Girija Veeresh Basavanagouda Mali Earanagouda Muradabasappa G. Hanmanthappa Chidanandappa Srikantha Gouda Total Average Per acre Gram Panchayat Hediginal Badarli Valabellary Badarli Giniwar Badarli Badarli Badarli Haretanur Badarli Thimmapur Badarli Udbal Mad-Sirwar Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar Gomarsi Mad-Sirwar Budiwal Mad-Sirwar MadaSirwar Mad-Sirwar Alabanur Alabanur Belagurki Alabanur Village Crop grown paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri paddy-Sona masuri Data from Demonstration Plot Area Net (ha) Expenditure Yield Rate Return Profit 0.4 9000 27 950 25650 16650 0.2 5050 12.5 980 12250 7200 0.2 5200 11.5 1050 12075 6875 0.4 11600 28 1010 28280 16680 0.4 12350 29 1000 29000 16650 0.4 11400 26 940 24440 13040 0.4 10700 28 960 26880 16180 0.4 11500 28 1010 28280 16780 0.4 11600 28 975 27300 15700 0.2 5300 14 1030 14420 9120 0.4 9750 27 970 26190 16440 0.4 10700 27.5 990 27225 16525 0.4 11450 28 1000 28000 16550 4.6 125600 314.5 309990 184390 0.35 9662 24.19 989.6 23846 14184 1 27304 68.37 67389 40085
It is clear from the table above that, by investing an amount of Rs.27304 per acre, the farmer has received a net return of Rs.40085 by adopting IFS approach during the year.
1.3.5
Supplement income by growing High Yielding Varieties (HYV): About 47 farmers have come forward to demonstrate high yielding varieties of vegetable cultivation during summer and the project has supported their intervention in terms of inputs as well as technical supports. The list of 37 farmers who have successfully completed the demonstration among these 47 farmers are provided belowAlabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Badarli
Bendi, Pundi, Palak, Mullangi, Ere, Thupre, Bringel, Lady-finger, Menthre Palle, Kothambre etc.,
Sl. Name of the farmer Village No. Amreshappa Alabanur 1 2 Yankappa Alabanur 3 Ambanna Alabanur 4 G.Veeresh Alabanur Amresh Kannari 5 Basappa Kannari 6 Kannari 7 Dodda Ambanna Vishwanath R Kannari 8 Bimal Sarkar Indranagar 9 Amal Sarkar Indranagar 10 11 Abanna Nayak Giniwar
Gram Area Crop grown Panchayat (ha)

1.00 1.00 0.20 0.27 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.10 1.20 1.10 0.05
Data from Demonstration Plot Expenditure Yield Rate Return

9605 6550 5930 9210 2760 3010 3690 1850 13940 10365 2150 33500 26200 25500 35000 7450 15000 8000 5000 70000 32100 7500
Net Profit
23895 19650 19570 25790 4690 11990 4310 3150 56060 21735 5350
. 38

Sl. Name of the farmer No. 12 Kumar swamy P Tippanna 13 14 Devanna M 15 karilingappa 16 yankoba yankoba 17 Ambresh 18 Saraswathi M 19 Madhusudhan 20 21 Bishwanath Bar Khadu Mandal 22 23 Jagadish bawali 24 Suresh biswas 25 Sharanappa Amresh 26 Shiwangouda 27 28 Hanumanthappa Shankrappa 29 Kariyappa 30 Mahadevappa 31 32 Pampapati 33 Gangappa 34 Veeresh Shivarayappa 35 Mallappa 36 Virupanna 37 Total Average Per acre Village
Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar RH C No.5 RH C No.5 RH C No.5 RH C No.5 RH C No.5 RH C No.5 Haretanur Haretanur Haretanur Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Gomarsi Udbal EJ Udbal EJ Udbal EJ Budihal Budihal Budihal
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Gram Area Crop grown Panchayat (ha)
Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar Madsirwar 0.05 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.00 2.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 14.42 0

Data from Demonstration Plot Expenditure Yield Rate Return
2010 7140 5930 6430 6530 6330 4520 9250 11980 5930 3900 6720 3690 3800 6230 6230 4600 6230 4110 5000 4600 4020 6720 3900 3900 5330 214090 5786 14847 8500 25000 25500 25500 25500 25500 17000 42000 47200 25500 18500 8000 18000 7500 14500 20500 14400 16500 12500 23500 17000 14100 8000 15250 18500 10500 769700 20803 53377
Net Profit
6490 17860 19570 19070 18970 19170 12480 32750 35220 19570 14600 1280 14310 3700 8270 14270 9800 10270 8390 18500 12400 10080 1280 11350 14600 5170 555610 15016 38531
Bendi, Pundi, Palak, Mullangi, Ere, Thupre, Bringel, Lady-finger, Menthre Palle, Kothambre etc.,
0 0
0 0
.39

The same can be better understood from the following table; a rupee invested in SRI fetches a return of Rs.3.06 with a net Demonstration Investment Return Net Profit return of Rs.2.06 while that in the case of SRI 1.00 3.06 2.06 Vegetables 1.00 2.47 1.47 vegetable is Rs.2.47 & Rs.1.47 and for IIFS IIFS 1.00 3.60 2.60 is Rs.3.60 and Rs.2.60 respectively. It demonstrates that IIFS remained more beneficial crop during the year.
. 40
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Technical Training: Further, the farmers were taken to University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur wherein 54 farmers and all project staffs participated in a day-long exposure cum training on IFS at KVK, Raichur on 24-9-2010 to gain knowledge about the activities to be adopted with the irrigation tanks. This training mainly focused on IIFS, horticulture crops, animal husbandry, agriculture extension practices for rabi crops, fish cultivation, etc. Dr. A. R. Kurubar, Horticulture Specialist and Dr. B. K. Desai, Specialist for IFS and Mr. Mohanchandra Chawhan and 3 professors from KVK and UAS, Racihur were involved during this training program.
.41
1.3.6
Introduce Collective Purchase of inputs and sale of produces: The concept of Collective Purchase and Marketing through AIG is introduced among the farmers and one of the AIG has already started practicing by procuring all the inputs through collective purchasing process. The inputs purchased by the Sri Basaveshwara AIG, Haretanur from KVK Raichur for about 100 farmers and distributed in small quantity to these farmers are 1) Ticoderma 2) Rhysobium 3) Azatobacter 4) Azospirlam 5) PSB culture 6) All types of seeds for all demonstration
. 42
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai Chapter II
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Learning from Field

(February 2010 March 2011) Social projects are implemented to learn from the experiences and a project of this nature has a broader goal for learning for wider application. NREGA has attracted the attention of global planners and more so if productive assets creation is possible leveraging funds from this very important & large scale project. At the end of the project period, Janakalyan team has learnt many things, some of which are recorded below in the following sequence2.1 Major Problems faced in implementing the activities: Problems are bound to come and we are there to overcome all such problems is the basic understanding of Janakalyan team. An effort to put all these problems in this chapter is not to discourage the readers but to help them not to repeat the same. Learning comes if problems are encountered while implementing activities in field and therefore, problems are recorded first followed by learning. The major problems encountered by the team while implementing the activities are Villages belong to a particular Gram Panchayat while the land of the farmers falls in the boundary of another revenue village. Which village microplan shall cover the farmer? Many farmers are requesting to take up productive asset creating works in their farm only; how to prioritize and whom to leave? During rainy season, it would be difficult to get labors for the works like drainage line, farm pond excavation, etc. Lack of participation of PRI members in the gram sabha as well as micro planning exercise. If the land falls under Tungabhadra command area, then farm pond cannot be excavated, the GP secretary says. Farmers do not sit in the gram sabha throughout the discourse to deal with the issues related to farming. Most of the farmers are interested to show their own land during the transect walk; they dont walk to others land due to hot sun in this summer. Many of the farmers do not have job cards; how to get is an issue for the farmers. Difficult to get 50 members in each AIG especially in the small villages. Election of Gram Panchayat has created difficulty in completing the microplanning exercise and also the estimate; similarly approval of the plan was also difficult until the election completed. Communities have negative attitude towards social development initiatives and government functionaries, especially anything related to Gram Panchayat. Lack of cooperation by Gram Panchayat Secretary and PRI members. Some of the farmers still do not know about NREGA and its provisions. Reluctance of communities about NREGA activities as well as Gram Panchayat members was the foremost obstacle in implementing the project activities; it is difficult to change the mindset of communities about NREGA & GP members. The rights and entitlements of communities under prestigious NREGA were not known to the communities; they only knew that NREGA is for the GP members, they need to give their job cards to the GP members for implementing the works.
.43

GP members considered themselves as the contractors to implement NREGA activities as planned by the GP secretary. The GP secretary also fixes the target and timeline that the said amount MUST be spent within a prescribed time limit without even bothering the agricultural operations. Election process for lower tier of PRI i.e. GP members and subsequently election of Presidents and Vice-presidents delayed implementation of all NREGA activities. Demand of each farmer to take up his/her land for excavation of farm ponds / drainage in waterlogged areas / plantation of trees/ construction of roads, etc was another major difficulty before the team to finalize the microplans. Many duplicate job cards have been created to draw funds after carrying out the activities using machineries. In every village, duplicate bank accounts have been created in the names of the wage-earners without their notice and amount has been drawn from their accounts with fake signatures / thumb impressions. Action Plan not prepared in Gram Sabha but by the GP members without even consulting the stakeholders and such prepared action plans are not being approved in time for proper implementation. Labor-oriented works are not being taken up in almost 98% cases. Almost all works are carried out by machines and materials; however, in the documents they have maintained the 40:60 ratio of materials: labors. NREGA wage is less than the market wage rate in irrigated areas; there is huge demand for raising the wage-rate as per the market rate. Technical staffs are not recruited by ZP but outsourced causing delay in payment and work execution. No systematic documentation at GP level delaying the payment process up to 6 months in several cases. Mates are not recruited at GP level; those who have been recruited by labor group is also not accepted by the GP/departments. Worksite facilities to the wage earners are not provided at all; wage-earners are not aware of such entitlements. Continuous 15 days works not given to any group in GP. Insurance is not being provided to any workers who have completed 50 days of works. Injured workers are not provided with hospital benefits as per the provision of NREGA. Our anticipation in the beginning of the project about the policy level problem as a hurdle to complete the works in time was the most important cause for failure to initiate the works. The government took a decision to reject all old job cards and requested people for fresh registration for job cards with their family and individual photos of all who wants to work under NREGA. With this decision coming into force, we had no eligible labors as per the Act and thus had start from zero with facilitation of the labor groups for job card registration and bank account opening. This consumed our whole quarter for entire team with negligible results as the community has really lost faith in the scheme. When we engaged ourselves in this job card mobilizing and bank account opening kind of ground work, the conflict between OLD & NEW GP members reached peak. The old group wants their payment for approved (executed in last financial year) works while the new group demands for execution of all works as per the approved plan. Finally, none of the works has been implemented in any of the GP. The micro-plans prepared by Janakalyan team involving all sections of the community and old GP members was withhold at ZP level, the interest of AIG members and other people to whom we had
. 44
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
trained started diminishing. The team failed to sustain the motivation level of these trained people despite several efforts. Lack of personnel at the GP level is another big hurdle; there is only single post i.e. Panchayath Development officer (PDO) to look after about 15-20 schemes of GP along with NREGA. Further each PDO is made responsible for 2-3 GP. Even taking care of 1 GP by 1 PDO itself is a heavy to bring outputs. In our project GPs too, full time PDO was not till date but after several protests, the government has appointed only 2 PDO in 3 GPs. The wage rate of project area in agriculture operations is very high compared to that of NREGA and thus getting labor during crop-season (July-February) is difficult; however, in off-season (MarchJune) the labors are available in plenty. During the last (2009-10) year flood, lot of activities have been executed in all the Gram Panchayat of Raichur district which were not approved in last year Action Plan (beyond the approved budget by the Government of India); these activities have been officially approved during current year action plan and decided to make payment to the old GPMembers during the current financial year while the newly elected GP members want to take up new works. Therefore, they are not taking up any work during the current but entering last year figures in the website. The new GP members want to implement all the approved works as per the action plan while the old GP members, since they have invested in these works want their payment reimbursed by the officers. Both the groups are right as well as wrong because most of the works have not been implemented by the old members but are claiming for payment, thus the old members are at fault; similarly, some of the works have been implemented but was not paid and hence the new members are at fault. In this fight, the labor groups are the sufferers. The conflict between old and new GP members is a problem difficult to resolve. One of the reasons is that most of the works which the old GP members are claiming for payment are either incomplete or not executed at all while there are some genuine cases also. The new GP members want to conduct a systematic scrutiny and then make payment for genuine works. Election code of conduct was cited as the reason till last quarter while now their statement has changed.
2.2 Solutions to the problems: Most of the issues are resolved through discussion and debate among the farmers themselves. Various types of stakeholders such as youths, leaders, farmers and wage earners are involved in these meetings. Lot of discussions about NREGA and Janakalyan approach to make it successful with the cooperation of farmers helped resolving most of the unhappiness among the farmers. How Janakalyan is different from Gram Panchayat and government functionaries was clarified to address these issues. Government is taking all kinds of measures to rectify the misappropriations that has taken place in past while implementing NREGA and therefore, you can expect good results in the days to come was a kind of assurance that Janakalyan team has given to the communities in order to remove their reluctance attitudes. Several rounds of training and awareness activities to the AIG members and wage-earners and potential farmers have made them aware about the Rights & Entitlements under NREGA along with all salient features of the said Act, which are in favor of the communities / wage-earners and farmers.
.45

Taking PRI members into confidence by involving them in each and every activity under the project was another strategy to bring them on track. Convincing the farmers that each of them will get the benefits from NREGA once it is streamlined as per the provision of the Act; they must cooperate to initiate few activities under these heads and thereafter, they will exercise their own rights to get the benefits for excavation of farmponds, plantation, drainage or road. The concept of Model GP has motivated the newly elected GP members and other elected representatives as well as frontline functionaries to involve themselves in the project activities. Use 1st year for these asset creation activities and if the community does not recognize their service, then next 4 years they can use to get their investment back has worked to bring the GP members on track. Facilitated the process of getting their new job cards from the authority on case to case basis. Action Plans are prepared in Gram Sabha for the 1st time in the history of NREGA using microplan tool and efforts are on to get these approved by the government. Of late, started promoting labor groups in each of our operation villages and decided to link these groups with labor union in the district. Participated in 3 rounds of protests exclusively to change the situation of NREGA programs at district level in association with other institutions/associations operative in the district to create pressure on the government. Initiated an action to involve all NGOs and other networks around the issue and conducted a district level hunger strike and AHORATRI DHARANA on 15.8.2010 day at Ambedkar circle, Raichur. Compelled the Principally Secretary, Department of RDPR, Government of Karnataka to intervene at district level to initiate the execution of shelf of works with immediate effect. AIG and WEG members met twice in the last 5 months to discuss about permanent PDO to be posted to Madsirwar and Badarli Panchayat. MLA discussed with EO, taluka panchayat and arranged PDOs for both the GP during last month. In all the 3 GPs already Gram Sabha conducted to start works under NREGA immediately. We facilitated about 1000 families already for registration of job cards and to obtain job cards and to open SB accounts as during the reporting period. Helped the communities to take the photos and other documents to get job cards.
2.3 How these could have been better implemented: To make these activities more effective, following should have been adopted Little more time shall have been provided to make these plans more effective and interactive. Election and paddy harvesting hindered the process of participation; it would have been more effective, had it been done little later. Presence of Gram Panchayat members as well as secretaries could have been ensured in microplans after another 15-20 days (after completion of election process). The project that has commenced in February 2010 should have been commenced little earlier than this, i.e. during September-October 2009, as proposed in our proposal; this could have helped us to finalize the shelf of works using micro-planning tool before December 2009 and submitted to the government for its approval. Now that the government has already approved an action plan for 2010-11, they are assigning the same reason and not accepting the plan prepared by the community to take up asset building activities. This being the major problem, we could have avoided by submitting the action plan before the due date.
. 46
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
We have planned for asset creating activities whereas the implementing authorities are neither equipped nor interested even in implementation of the project activities through labors. At the same time, the wage-earners are also not willing to take part in labor-oriented works due to various factors of NREGA implementation. We should have addressed these basic issues first before taking up larger issues like asset-building activities. At least 1 year should have been earmarked for the awareness building and community empowerment works in these GP before initiating assetcreating activities. While most of the issues related to NREGA are complex in nature and beyond the control of small scale intervention and thus demands large scale intervention. However, project commencement and duration is also a hurdle in our way which could be resolved by extending it for few more months. But, to make this program a successful event in future, it shall be taken up at least for 3 years period as described in the learning section of this report.
2.4 Learning: The major learning during the reporting period are Microplan is an important tool to bring communities to the same platform. Farmers have greater needs for productive assets creating activities but are not aware about the provisions of NREGA. Farmers have very negative attitude towards Gram Panchayat and are reluctant to participate any activities in the name of Gram Panchayat. Farmers have their own reservation against SRI, IFS and vegetable cultivation and might become difficult to implement these activities in these villages. Janakalyan team has lot of apprehensions about the new set of Gram Panchayat members going to get elected on 8.5.2010; success of the project mostly depend on these sets of PRI members as implementation of NREGA activities are directly undertaken by this lower tier of PRI. Communities have very raw ideas about NREGA, its objectives, their rights and entitlements, how they can get benefits from NREGA, how it could help them to resolve all agricultural needs. Community feels that NREGA is meant for the GP members and they are the contractors to execute this shelf of works. Community does not see any role in implementation of NREGA shelf of works; neither they know who to plan the works and for whom? Communities have made to understand by the PRI members as well as government functionaries that they are supposed to hand over their job cards to the GP members. The innocent men / women from the rural areas have now learning corruption because of NREGA; they engage themselves in their farm-works while hand over their job-cards to the GP members @ 15-30% of the wage-rate. Janakalyan should not have planned the asset-creating activities for the 1st year rather it should have taken up awareness, capacity building and empowerment activities during the 1 st year; the asset-building activities should have been taken up in the subsequent years. Project should commence in accordance with the NREGA cycle as per the government norms so that the micro-planning is completed in November and shelf of works is submitted in December to the government for approval. This kind of project shall be taken up in larger areas (more number of GPs) to create pressure on government. The intervention in small areas might not create the desired pressure on both political as well as administrative system.

Policy level advocacy at district and state levels is equally important to make the project successful in parallel to the field level interventions. Demonstration of agricultural practices shall be planned only after creation of durable productive assets in the farms leveraging funds from NREGA. Without creating of assets neither SRI nor IIFS or vegetable cultivation is possible. For all these, we need to ensure availability of irrigation water on regular basis. The project concept is well taken by the communities and all of them are participating wholeheartedly as this can really make their livelihood secured in long run; the only issue is the duration of the project should have been at least 3 years to implement all these planned activities is their suggestion. One must predict all the possible obstacles well ahead of initiating the concept; e.g. in this case, we had never thought about the upcoming GP election which has direct relation in implementation of NREGA activities. Similarly, the case of project commencement and period. We have learnt from our experience that a program of this nature shall be initiated in July-August for a minimum of 3 years period. Preplanning Phase (July-October): All the preplanning activities (AIG promotion,farmer election, microplanning, etc.) shall be completed before October and actual implementation (excavation of irrigation tanks) shall commence immediately after harvesting of the crops. Because, the land become free from crops during this period and also government accepts the shelf of works in December. This period could be effectively be used in building relationship with various line departments for possible collaboration to leverage funds from developmental projects. Planning phase (November-December): In consultation with GP, executing authorities and labor groups the work execution plan shall be prepared during November- December. Execution Phase (January-June): Execution of shelf of works including irrigation tanks should be done between January-June. This is the very right time to complete all farm pond excavation, bund strengthening, drainage in water-logged areas and other similar works. Demonstration Phase (July-March): Immediately after execution and with the commencement of monsoon in July, we can introduce crop & water related experiments in the field to demonstrate the benefits of IIFS package of Janakalyan. Field days, Result sharing program, internal exposures for neighboring farmers, etc shall also be conducted during this period to bring more farmers under the umbrella. Post Implementation Phase (April-June): This is the period when planning shall be done for next phase of activities based on the performance in previous project period. This is how we have planned to use the learning form the project to incorporate in next project phase. Complementary approach is the best approach and would be successful in a way we are proceeding ahead in due course of time. Complementary approach is the best approach as against the right-based approach for a program like NREGA to ensure real benefits to the farmers. Complementary approach, as practiced in this project, is slow but steady and is a sustainable intervention in long run while the right-based approach might bring immediate results but wipe out at the end of the intervention. Institution building at the grass root level for the wage-earners as well as farmers is essential component of the project to create productive agriculture assets which acts as pressure groups for the PRI members as well as government functionaries. Microplanning is the only tool to mobilize communities by making them realized their needs and the possibilities of getting these needs met through the NREGA.
. 48
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Information is power and thus the communities made aware about the facts and figures related to NREGA on day to day basis, it would make them active in deriving the benefits from the national flagship program like NREGA; a kiosk at Gram Panchayat may help a lot to achieve this goal. Though it is not that easy to motivate the elected representatives and government functionaries towards selfless works, but the team is now ready with several strategies to ensure that they create productive agricultural assets in the subsequent years. There are many farmers for whom the productive agriculture assets have been sanctioned under NREGA but are not interested to execute these works instead wants to get some percentage of the earmarked budget without creating the structures; this is because they do not have proper knowledge about these structures and also the importance of such structures and the impacts that these structures would bring in long term. Our efforts have changed mindsets of many farmers to execute the works in their farmers during the year. The labors are also hesitating to participate in execution of the works as they are not able to meet the output criteria and thus minimum wage per day; instead if they go for agriculture operations, they can earn more money than NREGA with lesser efforts and energies. Therefore, many of the works have been implemented using machines in the places where labors were not available.
.49
Chapter III
Action Plan
(April 2011 March 2014) 3.1 Plan of Action for next 3 years to make it a replicable model: Based on the learning from pilot phase, Janakalyan proposes that interventions which it has initiated in February 2010 shall be taken forward with the following activities for next 3 years commencing from April 2011 with the support of SDTT. This being a unique approach of Janakalyan, nowhere in the country it has been implemented. Upon successful of the intervention, it would become a National Model and could be adopted in all districts across the country. If, using this complementary model, we can reduce the corruption even by 20-30% form the present level, it would be huge contribution to the country if we consider the amount of funds the government is investing in this particular program. The following activities have been planned for next 3 years keeping the learning in mind.
Sl. No. I Activities to be Completed Justification / Descriptions about the activities
Target
Quarters 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th11th12th
Developing the skills and empowering the communities to prepare their own plan using micro-planning tools, shelf of works and labor budget under NREGA for their Gram Panchayat and get it approved in the Gram Panchayat and subsequently include in the district level plan 1 Task Force Committee (TFC) Education about NREGA is very important among communities; they must realize how public 40 TFC formation in each of our funds are not used for the purposes it is meant for in the present system of NREGA operational villages for implementation and what their role to implement all works with 100% efficiency and NREGA. transparency. To create a cadre of people in the villages who would take active role of vigilance to review the activities proposed under NREGA, its implementation, motivating labor groups to take part in the work execution To ensure their participation in implementation of NREGA shelf of works to create 50 productive agricultural assets and providing employment to needy families. institutio
Efforts shall be put to ensure that the Action Plans preparation and beneficiary selection 40 shall be in gram sabha using micro-planning tools only and the final list must be micropla displayed in prominent places of the villages. The practical & felt needs of the ns communities shall be reflected in the Annual Action Plans prepared under NREGA giving more emphasis on labor-oriented productive assets creating works/ activities. Sensitization Campaign for (3 tiers) PRI members with special focus on Gram Sabha members to sensitize the importance of irrigation tanks, plantation, drainage and physical II connectivity of the land and the scope of covering these under NREGA 5 PRI members must be given NREGA is not only meant for labors but also for whole communities as it helps creating lot of 300 PRI
Promotion of Women Groups, Wage Earners Group (WEG) and Agriculture Interest Groups (AIG) Strengthening Women Groups / SHGs in each village through capacity building training Ensuring effective conduct of Gram Sabha and preparation of action plans in the gram sabha
ns
To motivate them to take part in implementation of shelf of approved productive asset 1000 creating works instead of letting all the works being implemented by the GP members. member

Sl. No.
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Target Quarters 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th11th12th

Activities to be Completed motivational, personality development and life skill development training to imbibe high level principles in their lives. Justification / Descriptions about the activities
public assets in the rural area. It allows GP members to take up all kinds of rural member development activities to create basic facilities & required amenities; thus PRI members can s and create their self-respect, positive image and moral value in the eyes of local public. governm Through this training if we can bring positive development attitude among at least 2-3 PRI officers members from each village, it would be a great achievement and definitely we will achieve the expected changes in the villages through them. To orient them about the importance of productive agricultural assets under NREGA for 5 making the agriculture sector profitable in long run. worksho
ent
Workshop to sensitize bureaucrats as well as elected representative
Implementation of sanctioned shelf of works to generate employment opportunities for their fellow villagers; at the same time, create water harvesting structures (irrigation III tanks), improve connectivity, improve soil health and plant biomass generating species in the farms. Supplement these activities with demonstration of IIFS package to make agriculture sustainable. 7 Execution of productive Creating water harvesting structures, soil health improvement systems (drainage), land 200 agricultural assets creating development, plantation and other such productive assets by leveraging funds from NREGA works activities in project villages through Community Driven Development Approach 8 Demonstration of latest To demonstrate judicious utilization of water and other natural resources created 50 agricultural technologies with leveraging NREGA funds demonst farmers ration IV Facilitation of knowledge building by providing access to information through knowledge center establishment as well as community magazine introduction in the villages 9 Wall Magazine to display Transparency shall be brought in implementation of NREGA shelf of works by ensuring that 144 NREGA works related the GP displays the information on works approved, work allotted to SHG/ institution/ Number information on weekly / department for implementation, works under progress, works completed, etc., on the notice s monthly basis in every village board and it is to be updated and uploaded to GP website regularly. 10 A Kiosk with internet To provide updated information to the communities on every project, every village with 8 kiosks connection shall be put in approved budget and its utilization on day to day basis; this will help public to know all each GP head quarter information from time to time and raise questions for prevention of corruption to a large extent. This Kiosk shall also provide latest amendment to the NREGA implementation and all relevant forms for labor communities. It would also assist the stakeholders to apply for employment, unemployment allowance, insurance, work site facilities, medical benefits, etc.
.51
3.2 Strategies to implement the program: In future, the following strategies to be adopted to effectively implement the proposed activities Sensitizing the elected PRI members immediately about the needs of the farmers and how they can contribute towards their village development. Taking these elected representatives into confidence and implementing the shelf of works in their leadership. Take the PRI members for an exposure to a place where the elected representative has done an excellent work under NREGA. Orienting the front line functionaries to take up asset-building activities under NREGA. A meeting of all the officers from all 3 tiers of PRI system in the chairmanship of the local MLA to give them an impetus, which would help us to get the support and cooperation of the elected representative as well as PRI members. Empowering AIG & Wage-earners to demand for asset-building activities under NREGA. AIG/WEG would be the central force to implement the shelf of activities planned under NREGA. Empower the labor groups (WEG) and submit demand for works to respective GP as per approved shelf of works. Complementary approach would be adopted to ensure the planned activities are implemented with their cooperation; if it does not work, then the right-based approach through these AIGs would be initiated because by then our AIGs would also become enough strong through our capacity building initiatives. Pursue with government for approval of micro-plans prepared by the community for next financial year (2011-12) as this is the right time for submission to the government for approval. We ensure the members from all WEG and AIGs attend the monthly KDP meetings convened by EO at taluka level to share their concerns. We would invite the Taluka level NREGA nodal officers to the respective GPs to resolve the conflicts arise from time to time and to give immediate solutions in the field itself at GP level, if necessary at respective village level too. We continue to organize labor community and form WEGs and educate them and help them for registration for job cards, bank account opening and to submit job demand application to GP. Help GP to conduct WEG members meeting every month to discuss about works on going, works completed and works yet to be taken up and to develop action plans involving all WEG members for successful implementation of works by maintaining coordination among all levels. This kind of regular monthly meeting will certainly help to ensure works execution in time, proper monitoring and documentation so that payments also will be credited to their account in time. 3.3 Anticipated Problems: Some of the anticipated problems which might come in the way of implementing these activities are Seasonal agricultural operations might come in the way of implementing the NREGA activities; shortage of labor in time would be a constraint. Approval of the shelf of works (prepared using microplan tool) by government would be a constraint. This would become the major constraint in achieving our target of leveraging funds from NREGA for asset creating activities. Failure of monsoon would be a constraint in demonstrating the agricultural packages such as IFS, SRI and high-income crops. Delay in completing asset building activities would bear an impact on the demonstration activities, as these are directly related with the proposed assets such as drainage in waterlogged areas & excavation of farm ponds.
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
The elected GP members might also become a constraint in the way of taking up asset creating activities under NREGA, if they are not self-driven. Policy level decisions by the government/ policy makers in relation to NREGA would become the major constraint in achieving the objectives. Shortage of labor might be another issue as there is a chance that many works start simultaneously in all the GPs to complete government targets before closure of the financial year; thus use of machines might be more than expected. Our labor groups might not get more opportunities to work as they wont be able to participate in parallel works. Transfer of PDOs may be a great hurdle to achieve progress in time. 3.4 Strategies to ensure participation of all stakeholders: The strategies those would be adopted to ensure participation of all the stakeholders in the project execution would different for different groups as stated belowPlan to ensure peoples participation: Without participation of the wage-earners and farmers, this project is a day-dream; the major strategies would remain AIG is the central strategy to ensure wage-earners while demonstration of agricultural demonstration Taking up asset-building activities would ensure participation of farmers in the project Regular meeting of AIG, Need-based training to the farmers and Routine gram sabha in all villages would ensure participation of the community in the project activities. Bring more and more families under the umbrella of WEG / AIG Plan to ensure PRI members participation: Participation of PRI members, especially the lower tier is essential component to make the activities implemented through NREGA. The major advantage we have is the new set of GP members, who have yet not been polluted by the polluted administrative and political practices. The major strategies that we plan to adopt to convince this PRI members are One to one contact with these elected GP members to motivate them towards social cause, Exposure trip for them to the MODEL GP in the country where good NREGA works have taken place; take all the PRI members to a GP where extraordinary works have been done by elected representative to motivate these PRI members. Motivational training on regular basis would help us to bring the PRI members on track. Implementation of all activities under their leadership, Requesting them to chair all community functions, Exposing them as the person who has been responsible for making the activities successful would be some of the major strategies to motivate the PRI members. Help the PRI members in engaging labors for the shelf of works they want to execute in their constitutions thereby providing jobs to our labor groups and implementing asset creating activities for the farmers. Provide all possible support in documentation and other execution related activities through our GPOs.
.53

Honoring these PRI members in functions organized in the villages and giving all credits before the communities that whatever good works are happening in their villages are because of these PRI members. Plan to ensure government staff involvement: Government functionaries are also important stakeholders in making the project successful; though, most of them have their own hidden agenda behind the scheme but still all of them also like to do some good works in their lifetime. However, they are driven by the context and thus cant translate this into action. Further, they also lack in man power and political will. Given an environment, we strongly believe they will cooperate and support our intervention and contribute significantly in making the project successful. The major strategy convincing strategy would be Do in your own way in all GP leaving only 3 GP for us to make these GP as model GP in making the objectives of NREGA achieved with your great cooperation and support. The government staffs will cooperate only when they feel that our interventions are complementing in achieving their targets and therefore the following strategies would be adopted in future1) Providing all assistance to the GP and TP level staffs in completing the approved activities in time through our AIG/WEG. 2) Assisting the government staffs to complete documentation of the activities through our GPOs. 3) Honoring the government staffs in public meetings organized in the villages and giving all credits before the communities that whatever good works are happening in their villages are because of these officers who are committed for the development of the communities. The major problems encountered and the lessons learnt are recorded in this chapter of the report and planned to use the above strategies in completing the planned activities in future.
. 54
Annex 1 Gram Sabha Details Sl. No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Village Date of Participants in 1st Gram Sabha Gram 1st Male Female SC ST Tot Sabha al 06-04-2010 42 20 10 42 06-04-2010 11 3 15 24 07-04-2010 18 10 18 07-04-2010 18 07 10 18 08-04-2010 33 10 1 33 08-04-2010 14 01 02 10 25 09-04-2010 36 10 15 36 09-04-2010 22 10 4 22 10-04-2010 18 2 2 3 18 10-04-2010 27 06 02 03 27 11-04-2010 11-04-2010 12-04-2010 12-04-2010 15-04-2010 16-04-2010 16-04-2010 14 28 26 23 25 26 34 02 04 10 10 6 10 8 08 10 8 16 28 26 23 25 26 34 Total No of Gram sabha Number of Average GS Participants 3 60% 3 50% 3 40% 3 60% 3 45% 3 50% 3 40% 3 50% 3 55% 3 70% 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 54% 60% 55% 40% 55% 60% 45%
Hedaginal Udbhal EJ Gomarsi Haretnur Alabanur Gonniganur Badarli Kannari Budihal Maladinni Camp B R Camp Valaballary Belagurki R H Colony No.5 Madasirvar Giniwar Timmapur
10 5 4

Annex 2 Situation Analysis Detail
Sl. Total GP Village No. Population 1 Alabanur 2065 Works taken up under Proposed activities NREGA Paddy, cotton, Farm pond, road repair, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm Sorghum, Bengal gram, village drain, jungle pond, plantation, flood control measures, sunflower cutting road repair Paddy, cotton, Farm pond, road, village Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm Sorghum, Bengal gram, drain, jungle cutting pond, plantation, flood control measures sunflower Paddy, cotton, road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm Sorghum, Bengal gram, jungle cutting pond, plantation, flood control measures sunflower Paddy, cotton Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm jungle cutting pond, plantation, flood control measures Paddy, cotton, sorghum Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm jungle cutting, canal pond, plantation, flood control measures desilting Paddy, cotton, sorghum, Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm sunflower bengalgram, jungle cutting pond, plantation, flood control measures Paddy, cotton, sorghum, Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, internal bund, farm sunflower bengalgram jungle cutting pond, plantation, flood control measures Paddy, Cotton, Road repair, village drain, Bunding, subsurface drainage, farm pond, sunflower, sorghum, jungle cutting plantation, flood control measures bengalgram Cotton, paddy, sorghum,Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree bengalgram, sunflower jungle cutting, canal plantation, flood control measures desilting Cotton, Paddy, Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree sunflower, bengalgram canal desilting, jungle plantation, flood control measures cutting Paddy, cotton, Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree sunflower, bengalgram jungle cutting plantation, flood control measures Paddy, cotton, Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree sunflower, bengalgram jungle cutting plantation, flood control measures Paddy, sunflower Road repair, village drain, Subsurface drain, farm pond, tree jungle cutting plantation, flood control measures Paddy, cotton, sorghum, Road repair, jungle Sub surface drain, farm pond, tree bengalgram, sunflower cutting, village drain plantation, flood control measure Paddy, sunflower, cottonRoad repair, village drain, Sub surface drain, farm pond, plantation, jungle cutting flood control measures, road repair Paddy, cotton, Road repair, village drain, Sub surface drain, farm pond, bunding, sunflower, bengalgram jungle cutting flood control measures, road repair Paddy, cotton, Road repair, village drain, Sub surface drain, farm pond, bunding, sunflower, bengalgram jungle cutting flood control measures, road repair Crops Grown
2
Alabanur
Belagurki
1858
Kannari
850
4 5
Maladinni Camp B R Camp
100 939
6 7 8
Badarli Haretnur Gonniganur
1447 953 145
9
Badarli
Giniwar
2400
10
Valaballary
1515
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Madasirawar
R H Colony No.5 Hedaginal Timmapur Madasirawa r Udbhal Budihal Gomarsi
1100 2298 1550 1740 840 1100 1749
. 56
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai Annex 3 List of WEG members

Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Name of the Member Nagamma Channama Sharadamma Basamma Mukappa Parvathamma Neelamma G.Venkatesh Parvathamma Channamma Basavaraj C.Mallamma Amrutha Earamma Aanandamma Venkatesh Pampapathi Nirmala Ratnamma Ambamma Ramesh Aalambi Huligemma Mudiyappa Mallamma Ambayya Yallamma Yankappa Basappa Yamanamma Renukamma Amaresh Gangamma Lakshmi Virupamma Yamanamma Sharanamma Ambamma Father / Husband
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Age 45 22 36 34 45 40 36 20 43 21 24 19 18 33 45 32 35 26 30 45 54 36 40 45 38 44 34 25 50 45 34 40 35 42 40 39 30 45
Sex F F F F M F F M F F M F F F F M M F F F M F F M F M F M M F F M F F F F F F
Caste Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath lingayath Lingayath Hadapad Hadapad Hadapad Muslim Madiwalar Madiwalar Madiwalar Madiwalar Nayak (ST) Nayaak(ST) Nayak(ST) Nayaka(ST) Nayaka(ST) Nayaka (ST) ST ST Lingayath SC SC Hadapad
.57
1. Alabanur
W/O Malleshappa D/O Malleshappa W/o Amareshappa W/O mukappa S/o Linganna W/o Basavarajappa W/O hanumanagouda S/o mukappa W/O Kalyanappa D/O Kalyanappa S/O Kalyanappa W/O Basavaraj D/O Basavaraj W/O Basappa W/O Rangapur Venkatesh S/O Sanna Amaragundappa S/O Rangapur Bheemanna W/O Pampapathi W/O Basappa W/O Ramesh S/O Mudakappa W/O Husen sab W/O Mudiyappa S/O Rajappa W/O Ambayya W/O Rajappa W/o Basappa S/O Basappa S/O Dyavappa W/O Basappa W/O Amaresh S/O Basappa W/O Adeppa W/O Yamanappa W/O Siddayya W/O Mudiyappa W/O Basappa W/O Ramesh

Sl. No. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Name of the Member Venkatesh Pampapathi Nirmala Ratnamma Ambamma Ramesh Aalambi Parvathamma Neelamma G.Venkatesh Parvathamma Mudiyappa Ayyappa Basamma Veeresh Pakeeramma Gurappa Ambamma Basavaraj Renukamma Husenappa Parvathamma Gireppa Hanumanthamma Thippamma Basamma Huligeppa Shanthamma Mahadevamma Nagamma Devendrapa Lakshmi Yallapa Earamma Ramanna Sharanamma Basavaraj Neelamma Ayyappa Basamma Ayyappa Father / Husband S/O Sanna Amaragundappa S/O Rangapur Bheemanna W/O Pampapathi W/O Basappa W/O Ramesh S/O Mudakappa W/O Husen sab W/o Basavarajappa W/O hanumanagouda S/o mukappa W/O Kalyanappa S/O Rajappa 2. Badarli S/O yallappa W/O Ayyappa S/O Duragappa W/O Veeresh S/o Ayyappa W/o Gurappa S/o Yallappa W/O Basavaraj S/O Mudakappa W/O Husenappa S/O Batta Ayyappa W/O Gireppa W/O krishnappa W/O Thirupathi S/O Bheemappa W/O Huligeppa W/O Lokappa D/O Lokappa S/o Huligemma W/o Devendrappa S/o Thippanna W/O Yallappa S/O Yallamma W/O Ramanna S/O Channappa W/O Basavaraj S/O Bheemappa W/O Ayyappa S/O Muddappa Age 32 35 26 30 45 54 36 40 36 20 43 45 32 28 28 25 38 32 26 21 27 24 32 30 40 38 30 25 35 18 28 22 38 35 50 40 25 20 38 32 35 Sex M M F F F M F F F M F M M F M F M F M F M F M F F F M F F F M F M F M F M F M F M Caste Lingayath lingayath Lingayath Hadapad Hadapad Hadapad Muslim Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Lingayath Madiwalar SC SC SC SC ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC
. 58

Sl. No. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Name of the Member Sharanamma Earappa Gangamma Sanna Sabanna Sangamma Ayyappa Devamma Hulagappa Channamma Ningappa Pamamma Yamunappa Mashamma Yallamma Basanna Husenappa Virupamma Basavaraj Umadevi Huchappa Shivamma Ayyappa Ambamma Jalihal Ayyappa Mukamma Ayyappa Muk Parvathamma Husenappa Parvathamma San Mallayya Ningamma Kanakappa Hanmanthamma Hanmantha Channabasamma San Devanna Papamma Huligeppa Huligeppa Dyavanna
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Father / Husband D/O Ayyappa S/O Sabanna W/O Earappa S/o Duragappa W/o Sanna Sabanna S/O Dodda Sabanna W/O Ayyappa S/O Thimmanna W/O huligeppa S/O Chagappa W/O ningappa S/O Basappa W/O Yamunappa W/O Basanna S/O Chagappa S/O Shivappa W/O Husenappa S/O Shivappa W/O Basavaraj S/O Husenappa W/O huchappa 3. Goniganur S/O Basappa(Uchegida) W/O Ayyappa Uchigida S/O kanakappa W/O Ayyappa S/O Earappa W/o Ayyappa Muk S/O Nagappa W/O husenappa S/O Nagtappa W/o mallayya S/O Mallayya W/O Kanakappa S/O Ayyappa W/O hanumantha S/O Shankarapa W/o Devanna S/O Dhyavanna S/o Dyavanna S/O Ayyappa
Age 18 35 45 40 35 26 21 35 30 30 27 40 38 22 26 26 21 22 20 24 22 30 27 38 32 39 32 28 26 30 28 35 30 40 35 40 32 21 22 45
Sex F M F M F M F M F M F M F F M M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M M M
Caste SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST Madiwalaru Madiwalaru Madiwalaru Madiwalaru ST

.59

Sl. No. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Name of the Member Yallamma Ayyappa Kanakappa Gangamma Lakshmi Pampanna Lakshmi Pompanna Huligemma Kariyappa Ambamma Huligeyya Nagamma Hanumayya Narasamma Basappa Gangamma Huligeyya Hampamma Amaresh Narasamma Pakeerappa Nagamma Hanumantha Gangamma Nagapa Pamayya Malappa Devamma Ramesh Ambanna Ramanna Channamma Amaresh Salgunda Rangamma Geethamma Swamy Earamma Ramanna Linganna Basamma Father / Husband D/O Dyavappa S/O Bheemraya S/o Bhimraya W/o Ayyappa W/O Kanakappa S/O Earappa W/O Pampanna S/O Thimmayya W/o pompanna S/O Yamanappa W/O kariyappa S/O kariyappa S/O kariyappa Ayyappa W/O hanumantha S/O Yamanappa W/O Basappa S/o Dyavappa W/O Devappa S/O Ramanna W/O Amaresh S/o Ramanna W/O Pakeerappa S/O Thimmayya W/O hanumanth S/o Gireppa S/o nagappa S/O Hanumanth W/O Malappa S/O Malappa S/O Hanumantha Age 24 26 45 34 41 35 35 44 40 35 30 48 20 39 40 46 40 40 30 40 30 45 40 45 40 30 45 39 35 26 27 28 25 35 32 55 28 25 25 60 50 Sex F M M F F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M M M F M F M M M F M M M F M F F M F M M F Caste ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST
4. Haretanur S/O Husenappa W/o Ramanna S/o Thippanna nayak W/O Amaresh Salgunda W/o Shippa S/o Shivappa W/o Swamy S/O Shivappa S/o Yankoba Giniwar W/o linganna
. 60

Sl. No. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Name of the Member Basavaraj Kanakamma Ramanna Ambamma Mukappa Huligemma Husenappa Gangamma San Ayyappa Mahadevamma San Ayyappa Duragamma Dod Ayyappa Lingamma Husenappa Dyavamma Parshuram Ayyamma Kanakappa Huligeyya Husenappa Basamma Ayyappa Lakshmi Gangappa Parvathamma Huligeyya Ayyamma Amaresh Sabanna Ayyamma Basayya Mukamma Huligeyya Gangamma Dod Kriyppa Duragamma Duragayya Hobalemma Parasappa
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Father / Husband S/O Ayyappa Giniwar W/O Basavaraj S/o Ayyappa Salgundi W/o Ramanna S/o San Ayyappa W/O Lachamayya S/o hanumanth W/o husenappa S/o Sagarappa W/O San Ayyappa S/o Earappa Devaramane W/O San Ayyappa S/O Earappa W/o Dod Ayyappa S/o Rangayya nalgamdinni W/O husenappa S/O Husenappa W/o Chinchar Ramanna S/o Chinchar Ramanna S/O Chincharki Ramanna S/O Ramanna W/o husenappa S/o Devendrappa W/o Ayyappa S/o Devendrappa W/o Gangappa S/o Devendrappa W/o huligeyya S/O Devendrappa S/o Ragayya W/o Sabanna S/o Rangayya W/O Basayya S/O Ayyappa Nalgamdinni W/o Huligeyya S/o Ayyappa nalgamdinni W/o Dod kariyappa S/o Ayyappa nalgamdinni W/o Duragayya S/o Ayyappa
Age 40 35 40 35 42 40 35 30 38 35 28 25 30 28 40 35 18 50 22 22 28 25 30 25 28 24 25 20 19 40 35 40 36 30 25 45 35 42 38 45
Sex M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M M M F M F M F M F M M F M F M F M F M F M
Caste ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST
5. Maladinni Camp

Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Name of the Member Narayanappa Duragamma Shivaraj Kariyappa Mahesh Beesamma Mariyappa Sharanappa K.Sharanappa Duragamma Dyavamma Adeppa Earamma Basavaraj Amaramma Rajasab Husenamma Husenamma Rajamma Hasensab Gudamma Husenamma Bashasab Durugappa Bandenavaz Husenbi Dyamamma Basamma Basavaraja Jalalamma Husenappa Gouramma Father / Husband S/o Ramanna W/o narayanappa S/O Narayanappa S/O narayyappa S/o Narayanappa W/o San Rangappa S/O San Rangappa S/o San Rangappa S/o Govindappa W/O K.Sharanappa W/o Amarappa S/o Amarappa D/O Adeppa S/O Adeppa D/o Adeppa S/o Hydersab W/O Rajasab W/O hydersab D/o Hydersab S/O Husensab W/o hasensab D/o hasensab S/O hasensab S/o Shivappa S/O Hasensab W/O Bande Navaz W/O Shivappa W/o Duragappa S/O Shivappa D/o Basavaraj S/o EArappa W/o Husenappa Age 48 40 24 22 20 48 30 26 35 30 45 30 25 20 18 26 24 45 20 48 45 24 20 35 30 26 40 30 26 24 40 35 Sex M F M M M F M M M F F M F M F M F F F M F F M M M F F F M F M F Caste ST ST ST ST ST Uppar Uppar Uppar Uppar Uppar ST ST ST ST ST Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Nayak Muslim Muslim ST ST ST ST SC SC
6. Belagurki
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pampathi Shyamamma Hanumantha Earamma Gangadhara Maremma Hanumantha Mankalemma S/o lachamanna W/o pampapathi S/o Lachamanna W/o hanumantha Lachamanna W/o Gangadhar S/o Hire Yankoba W/o Hanumantha 28 26 34 30 26 24 35 30 M F M F M F M F SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC
. 62

Sl. No. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Name of the Member Yankamma Hire yankoba Mudiyappa Lakshmi Lakshmipathi Mahadevi Husenappa Parevathamma Amaresha Basavaraja Gangamma Hanumanthi Bheemanna Guramma Anjanayya Devamma Husenamma Fakeerappa Krishnamma Yankappa Basamma Nagappa Muthamma Bheemamma Mudiyamma Ayyamma Hanumantha Rudramma Sharanabasamma Mahadevi Kariyappa Mallamma Beerappa Hampamma Amaresh Shivamma Basavaraj Ambamma Nagappa Lakshmi Yankappa
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Father / Husband W/o Hire Venkoba S/o kaggalappa S/O Thimmanna W/o Mudiyappa S/O nagappa W/O lakshmipathi S/O nagappa W/O husenappa S/o husenappa S/o San yankoba W/O Basavaraj W/o yankoba S/o Yamunappa W/o Bheemanna S/o Bheemayya W/o Anjanayya W/o Yamunappa S/o yankappa Dani W/o Fakeerappa S/o Balappa Yankappa Yankappa Nagappa Ayyappa Ayyappa W/O Basappa S/o Ningappa D/o hanumantha Hanumantha D/o hanumantha S/O Basappa W/O Kariyappa S/o Kariyappa D/o kariyappa S/o kariyappa W/o Amaresha S/o kariyappa W/o Basavaraj S/o Kariyappa W/o nagappa S/o kariyappa
Age 45 50 38 35 40 35 38 29 19 36 30 48 50 48 28 24 35 35 35 48 40 35 30 45 18 50 40 35 20 18 48 39 20 19 36 28 29 26 25 24 28
Sex F M M F M F M F M M F F M F M F F M F M F M F F F F M F F F M F M F M F M F M F M
Caste SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC ST ST ST ST ST ST Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru KURUBARU Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kururbaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru Kurubaru
.63

Sl. No. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 Name of the Member Earamma Girija Mallamma Ramadevi Yamunamma Dyamanna Gangamma Dyavamma Lakshmi Ratnamma Parvathamma Sharanamma Mallamma Shankramma Lakshmi Ningamma Earamma Gundamma Fakiramma Dodda Basamma Kamalamma Earamma Gangamma Kariyamma Earamma Mukudamma Malamma Kalasappa Husensab San hanumantha Kariyappa Virupanna Narasimharaj Nagaraj Mallamma Sharanamma Basavaraj Basavaraj Veerabhadrappa Father / Husband W/o Yankappa Age 26 Sex F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F M M M M M M M F F M M M OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC Caste Kurubaru OBC OBC OBC OBC SC OBC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC SC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC
7. Udbal
W/o Veeresh Hire Ningappa Veeresh Veeresh Virupanna Shekharappa W/O Ambanna Wo mudakappa W/o Dyavappa W/o Chandrayya Swamy W/o Ghamanna W/o Nagappa W/o kariyappa W/o yankappa W/o Virupanna W/O Hanumantha W/o Basanna W/o nagesh W/o Gundappa W/o yamanappa W/o Shekhappa W/o Basavaraj W/o hanumantha W/o Renukappa W/O Veerappa W/O yamanappa 8. Madasirwar S/o Thippanna S/o Rajasab S/o Siddappa S/O San Virupanna S/o Siddappa S/O hanumantha S/o Changaleppa W/O kariyappa W/o Shivappa 9. Gomarsi 35 32 25 20 30 25 34 32 25 28 34 39 44 26 19 22 43 37 34 56 45 54 34 29 43 33 45 44 39 32 29 44 25 34 40 34 27 45
OBC OBC
. 64

Sl. No. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Name of the Member Devamma Akbarsab Mallesh Mudakappa Dharmanna Yamunappa Yankappa Venkatesh Maskilsab Tajuddin Yankoba Veeresha Hampayya Siddappa San kariyappa Nirupadeppa Shivappa Kariyappa Mudakappa Dharmanagouda Mutturaj Mahadevappa Kariyappa Hanumanthappa Khajasab Jagiramma nagaraj
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Father / Husband
Age 45 42 31 24 23 19 22 26 31 42 47 25 26 29 30 33 22 33 40 18 24 29 35 39 41 28 24
Sex F M M M F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F M
Caste OBC OBC OBC OBC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC OBC SC OBC OBC OBC OBC
.65

Annex 4 List of AIG members
Sl. No.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Name of the AIG Member

T Basaavaraj Pampapati Sangamesh G Venkatesh Channappa Rajashekar P Suresh Basanagouda Prabakarao Basavaraj Amaresh Chidandappa Sharanabasava Jadiswami Lingaraj Basavaraj Channabasava Channabasava Ayyappa Yankappa Channappa Sharanppa Veeresh Ayyappa Channabasava Channappa Sharanabasava Doddabasava Rudragouda Matangappa Channappa Siddappa Kumbar Mallanna Hanumanth Suresh Shivappa Veeresh Adappa Venkatesh Basavaraj Nagaraj Basava Kariyappa Sharanappa Mounesh Basappa Karilingappa Ayyappa Tayappa 35 25 34 23 28 34 42 24 34 43 23 23 42 28 35 34 23 43 23 34 25 25 34 31 32 33 43 34 25 21 24 34 43 23 23 42 28 23 34 23 25 26
Age
Sex
Alabanur Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Kannari Male Male Male Male Male Male Male
Contact Number
9901060566 9880112041
Remarks
9901692550 9901584793 9535663542
9902844825 9972611691 9591701913
26 32 32 23 24 26 28
9535663452 9591097300
. 66
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur 8 Mareppa 45 Male 9611401048 9 Rudrappa 54 Male 10 Ramanagouda 54 Male 11 Mudiyappa 34 Male 9901561235 12 Suresh 33 Male 13 Veerabadrappa 54 Male 14 Yankappa 34 Male 15 Mariyappa 43 Male 16 Bhimanna 52 Male 17 Ambanna 42 Male 18 Ambanna 32 Male 19 Kuberappa 23 Male 20 Laxmikanthreddy 24 Male 21 Vishvanathreddy 25 Male 9972503367 22 Mudiyappa 23 Male 9845286785 23 Pampangouda 34 Male 9901222251 24 Jayaraj 23 Male 25 Ramesh 23 Male 9902701952 R.H. Colony No.5 1 Jagadish Bavali 52 Male 2 Madhav Bavali 34 Male 3 Satypriya Mandal 23 Male 4 Subhod Mandal 45 Male 9741154914 5 Bishvanath Bar 25 Male 6 Durgapad bar 45 Male 7 Prashant Biswas 23 Male 8 Sundar Mandal 42 Male 9 Murari Mandal 54 Male 10 Samakin Bairagi 34 Male 11 Balavar 35 Male 998014204545 12 Amulya Mandal 34 Male 9880051204 13 Shivakumar 32 Male 14 Kuber Mandal 33 Male 15 Shankar Ray 35 Male B.R Camp 1 Dadafir 45 Male 9945347453 2 Kariyappa 54 Male 9900808842 3 Mohan 32 Male 9611803421 4 Nabisab 31 Male 9945547433 5 Nagarjureddy 25 Male 9900679714 6 Ramakrishna 35 Male 984503735 7 Veerappa 34 Male 8 Amaregouda 31 Male 9972611691 9 Himanbareddy 23 Male 10 Ambanna 24 Male 9591670590 11 Marenna 34 Male 12 Ravindrareddy 23 Male 9902114590 13 Nagareddy 23 Male 9741622543 14 Sahadebamali 25 Male 9740336937 15 Channabasava 25 Male 997280419 16 Huseneppa 24 Male 17 Basavaraj 23 Male 18 Gopal Acharya 25 Male 19 Pampapati 23 Male Final Report (February 2010 March 2011) .67

20 21 Suribabu Mallikarjunreddy 25 26 Male Male Badarli 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Somappa Huseneppa Channabasava Nagappa Sharanabasava Devareppa Doddanagouda Hemavati Hanumanthappa Nagareddy Choudayya Pampapati Hanumanth Hanumanthappa Basanna Pampapati Amaramma Timmanna Basavaraj Anjineyya Siddayya Basanna Nagappa Akkamma Devaraddy Pampanagouda Sharanappa Veerangouda Virupayya Veeresh Vijay Durugappa Anand Danappa Ayyappa Mukappa Huligeppa Siddappa Pamanna Veeranna Hanumanth Huseneppa Hanumanthamma Nagappa Lalitamma Mudukappa Veeranna Duragappa Narasappa 23 24 26 28 45 54 54 34 33 54 34 43 52 42 32 23 32 31 23 25 27 21 32 31 34 34 32 33 21 25 34 23 45 25 45 23 42 54 34 35 34 32 33 35 28 45 54 54 34 Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Male Hedaginal Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Female Male Female Male Male Male Male
9945768675
9632633153
9591292659 9901996964
9901996964 9902202089 9448538430 9663239640
9972291572 9741629756
. 68
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur 20 Durugappa 33 Male 21 Nagappa 54 Male 22 Arunappa 34 Male 23 Venkoba 43 Male 24 Devaputrappa 52 Male 25 Manikkamma 42 Female 26 Durugappa 32 Male 27 Venkoba 23 Male 28 Yallamma 32 Male 29 Danappa 31 Male 30 Mallappa 23 Male 31 Erappa 25 Male 32 Pampanna 27 Male 33 Narasinhappa 21 Male 34 Eramma 45 Female 35 Ramappa 23 Male 36 Basavanth 42 Male 37 Satyappa 28 Male 38 Mallikarjun 45 Male 39 Hanumanth 54 Male 40 Venkayya 54 Male 41 Narasayya 34 Male 42 Anantreddy 33 Male 43 Bhagyamma 54 Female 44 Ramappa 34 Male 45 Krishnappa 43 Male 46 Umadevi 52 Male 47 Ayyanna 42 Male 48 Sanna Venkatesh 32 Male 49 Basanagouda 23 Male 50 Hanumanth 32 Male Madasirvar 1 Siddappa 34 Male 99721186606 2 Virupanna 35 Male 9880343197 3 Mallayya 34 Male 9663239535 4 Huseneppa 32 Male 9008436598 5 Siddappa 33 Male 9663239454 6 Kariyappa 35 Male 9535920633 7 Bhimanna 28 Male 8 Adavi 45 Male 9 Huligeppa 54 Male 10 Timmanna 54 Male 11 Kalasappa 34 Male 12 Nagaraj 33 Male 13 Lingappa 54 Male 14 Eranna 34 Male 15 Rudramma 43 Male 16 Hanumanth 27 Male 17 Amajappa 21 Male 18 Hanumanth 45 Male 19 Ramanna 23 Male 20 Yankappa 42 Male 21 Rudrappa 28 Male 22 Siddappa 45 Male Final Report (February 2010 March 2011) .69

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Nagaraj Chandrappa Adappa Bhimanna Kariyappa Virupanna Mallayya Basavaraj Govindappa Mudukappa Malappa Hanumangouda Ayyappa Sharanappa Chandrasekarayya Yankappa Narayanappa Pampanna Basavaraj Davanna Aleshappa Kasimbi Bhimama Yankappa Laxmipati Shankareddy Ayyappa Hanumanth Amaaresh Nagappa Nagappa Hulagappa Chandragouda Pakiramma Shivareddy Basamma Rudrappa Yankappa Basangouda Chandragouda Kariyamma Huseneppa Ningappa Eranna Akashappa Shivagnappa Basavaraj Huchamma Davanna Tayamma Aminamma Manamma Ambranna Venkatredy Davanna 54 54 34 33 54 34 43 52 24 34 23 42 32 23 32 31 23 25 27 21 45 23 42 28 45 54 54 34 33 54 27 54 54 34 33 54 54 54 34 33 54 34 54 54 34 33 54 34 43 52 42 32 23 32 31 Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Belagurki Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male
. 70
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur 45 Pakirapa 23 Male Budihal 1 Basangouda 54 Male 2 Doddangouda 54 Male 3 Ambanna 34 Male 4 Shanrappa 33 Male 5 Rangappa 54 Male 6 Basavaraj 34 Male 7 Kalyanappa 43 Male 8 Channabasava 52 Male 9 Bhimaraya 42 Male 10 Channabappa 32 Male 11 Chandrappa 23 Male 12 Shankragouda 32 Male 13 Amarappa 31 Male 14 MoulappaYankoba 23 Male 15 Pavademma 33 Male Udball 1 Yankoba 34 Male 2 Yallappa 54 Male 3 Hanumanthappa 54 Male 4 Basangouda 54 Male 5 Amrappa 54 Male 6 Hanumanthappa 34 Male 7 Hampayya 33 Male 8 Shivappa 54 Male 9 Nagappa 34 Male 10 Erappa 43 Male 11 Yankappa 52 Male 12 Mallayya 42 Male 13 Davanna 32 Male 14 Basanna 23 Male 15 Basavaraj 32 Male 16 Moulappa 31 Male 17 Veeresh 23 Male 18 Malappa Male 19 Hanumanthappa Male Haretnur 1 Annapurnamma 22 Female 2 Neelamma 34 Female 3 Chidandappa 43 Male 4 Ha,payya 54 Male 5 Sharanappa 54 Male 6 Basamma 34 Male 7 Amareshappa 33 Male 8 Pampapti 54 Male 9 Hanumesh 34 Male 10 Huseneppa 43 Male 11 Mallayya 52 Male 12 Manjunath 42 Male 13 Amaresh 32 Male 14 Shankrappa 23 Male 15 Basanna 32 Male Timmapur Final Report (February 2010 March 2011) .71

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mahes Swam Hanumanth Ayyappa Adappa Dodda Ayyappa Adappa Muduakayya Basappa Mallayya Mallikarjun Basavaraj Chagappa Ayyapppa Shekarayya swami Veerabdrappa Ayyappa Mallayya Ayyappa Parangouda Giregouda Basavarj Basanagouda Ramesh Lokesh Huligeyya Nagaraj Sagarappa Shankrappa Ayyappa Nagraj Timmayya Huligaeyya aTimmanna Basavaraj Mallayya Eranna Veeresh Basappa Nagabushan Jadeyy swami Rangappa Eranna Siddareddy Ayyappa Linganna Hampayya Gourappa Hampyaya Pampanna Lankeppa Ramesh Mallapagouda 23 54 54 54 34 33 54 34 43 52 42 32 23 32 31 23 Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Goniganur Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Valballary Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male
54 34 33 54 34 43 52 54 34 43 52 42 32 23 31 23 54 34 33 54 34 43 52 54 34 43 52 54 34 43 52 42 32
. 72
Annex 5 NREGA shelf of work execution details

Sl. No. I Category of work Water Harvesting Desiltation and improvement any open wells, ponds and water tanks Desiltation and improvement any open wells, ponds and water tanks Description of Works Formation of New tank for storing the water Formation of New tank for storing the water Alabanur GP Labor Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Madsirwar Labor Material Total Total Material
Labor
Total
540000 360000 0 360000 240000 0 360000 240000 0 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 0 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 660000 440000 0 1100000 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 600000 0 360000 240000 600000 600000 0 360000 240000 600000 900000 0 540000 360000 900000
6 7
Formation of Canal Irrigation Canals(Small and from 54 distributory to Minor irrigation canals) village providing water supply to Hanumappa S/O the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Thippanna families & IAY beneficiaries providing water supply to Huligeppathe Lands of SC-ST , BPL Bheemappa families & IAY beneficiaries providing water supply to the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Amaresh Karibasappa families & IAY beneficiaries Water harvesting & Formation of tank for Conservation works storing water Providing water supply to Hanumantha S/o the lands of SC-ST, BPL Huligemma families & IAY beneficiaries Providing water supply to the lands of SC-ST, BPL families & IAY beneficiaries Yankappa S/o Hanumantha Marriyappa S/o Bandeppa
660000 440000 1100000
Providing water supply to the lands of SC-ST, BPL 10 families & IAY beneficiaries

Sl. No. Category of work Description of Works Labor Alabanur GP Material Total 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 120000 0 80000 200000 708000 472000 0 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 1180000 708000 472000 1180000 0 120000 80000 200000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 0 0 40000 10000 50000 Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total Labor Total Material Total
Providing water supply to Mudiyappa S/o the lands of SC-ST, BPL Hanumatha 11 families & IAY beneficiaries Providing water supply to H.Sharanappa S/o the lands of SC-ST, BPL Jadeyappa 12 families & IAY beneficiaries Providing water supply to the lands of SC-ST, BPL Kariyappa S/o Erappa families & IAY beneficiaries 13 Providing water supply to Bagappa S/o the lands of SC-ST, BPL Kariyappa 14 families & IAY beneficiaries Providing water supply to Pampanna S/o the lands of SC-ST, BPL Gadeppa 15 families & IAY beneficiaries Desiltation and Formation of New improvement any open tank for storing the wells, ponds and water water 1 tanks Formation fo new Water harvesting & Tank for water Conservation works 2 storage pupores providing water supply to the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Basappa-Huligemma 6 families & IAY beneficiaries providing water supply to Basappa-Sanna the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Amaragundappa 9 families & IAY beneficiaries providing water supply to Basavaraja the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Thippanna 11 families & IAY beneficiaries providing water supply to Shekharayya S/O the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Karibasayya 14 families & IAY beneficiaries
40000
. 74
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Total Material
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Description of Sl. No. Category of work Works Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total providing water supply to the Lands of SC-ST , BPL Ayyappa Rangappa 40000 10000 17 families & IAY beneficiaries 50000 0 0 providing water supply to Narasappa the Lands of SC-ST , BPL 40000 10000 Honnurappa 20 families & IAY beneficiaries 50000 0 0 Desiltation and Desiltation of Irrigation improvement any open Tank of Kannari 360000 240000 wells, ponds and water village 22 tanks 600000 0 Desiltation and Desiltation & improvement any open improvement of water 120000 80000 wells, ponds and water tank 24 tanks 200000 0 Desiltation and Desiltation & improvement any open improvement of water 60000 40000 wells, ponds and water tank 25 tanks 100000 0 Desiltation and Desiltation & improvement any open improvement of water 60000 40000 wells, ponds and water tank 26 tanks 100000 0 Desiltation and Desiltation & improvement any open improvement of water 60000 40000 wells, ponds and water tank 27 tanks 100000 0 Desiltation & Desiltation and improvement of water improvement any open tank (fixing of boundry 30000 20000 wells, ponds and water stones and fencing by tanks 28 Tanthi) 50000 0 Total 1370000 630000 2000000 1380000 920000 2300000 1368000 912000 2280000 II Land development
Labor
Total
40000
10000
50000
40000
10000
50000
360000 240000
600000
120000
80000
200000
60000
40000
100000
60000
40000
100000
60000
40000
100000
30000 20000 50000 4118000 2462000 6580000
.75

Sl. No. Description of Works Levelling the Land development works of Navagrama area SC-ST, BPL & IAY lands and fixing the beneficiary lands boundries (in New 1 Residential sites) Land development works of Levelling the ground SC-ST, BPL & IAY of Sri.Hallada 2 beneficiary lands Duragamma Temple Land development works of ParvathammaSC-ST, BPL & IAY Sharanappa 3 beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Lingamma-Dyavappa 4 beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Moulappa-Basappa 5 beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Balaswamy-Rayappa 6 beneficiary lands Land development works of MudakappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY Hanumanthappa 7 beneficiary lands Land development works of Siddappa-Adi SC-ST, BPL & IAY Basappa 8 beneficiary lands Land development works of MuradabasappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY Basappa 9 beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Hirappa-yankappa 10 beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Earappanna-Ayyappa 11 beneficiary lands Land development works of EarappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY Hanumanthappa 12 Category of work Labor Alabanur GP Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total Labor Total Material Total
480000 320000 0 800000 60000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 0 0 12000 8000 8000 20000 20000 12000 12000 8000 8000 20000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000 0 480000 320000 800000
. 76
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Total Material
Sl. No.
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Description of Category of work Works Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands
Labor
Total
Karemma-Nagoleppa 0 Kannari NagappaMudukappa MoulappaHanumanathppa Gonappa 0 Hanumanthi-Hallappa 0 PampannaHanumantha Yallamma-Gyanappa 0 ShankarmmaKariyappa Durugamma-Earappa 0 0 0 0
12000
8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
13
12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000
8000 20000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
14
15
16
12000
8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
17
12000 0 0 12000
8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
18
19
12000 0 0 12000
8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
20
21
Mallappa-shivappa
12000
8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
22
Husenasab-Alamsab
12000
8000 20000 12000 8000 20000
23
.77

Sl. No. Category of work Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Description of Works Moulasab-Maab Sab Gangappayamanappa Laxmi-Ayyappa Labor Alabanur GP Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 Dasara Kariyappa DyavappaHosagerappa Hemareddyvenkanagowda Earamma-Ningappa 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 Dyavamma-Basappa 12000 8000 20000 Virupanna-siddappa 12000 8000 20000 Rudrappa-yamanappa Laxmamma-sanna Virupanna Pakirappayamanappa 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 Labor Total Material Total
12000
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
. 78
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Total Material
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Description of Sl. No. Category of work Works Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Land development works of ShankarmmaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 Rangangowda 36 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Huligemma-Basappa 12000 8000 37 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Husenappa-Honappa 12000 8000 38 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of AmabammaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 Govindraja 39 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of MangammaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 Rangappa 40 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Moulasab-Galimasab 12000 8000 41 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of SannappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 sharabanna 42 beneficiary lands 20000 Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY Earanna -Ayyanna 12000 8000 43 beneficiary lands 20000 Levelling the Land development works of Navagrama area SC-ST, BPL & IAY lands and fixing the 180000 120000 beneficiary lands boundries (in New 44 Residential sites) 0 300000 0 Land development works of DyavappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 yamanappa 45 beneficiary lands 0 0 20000 Land development works of Sanna yankappaSC-ST, BPL & IAY 12000 8000 Husenappa 46 beneficiary lands 0 0 20000
Labor
Total
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
180000 120000
300000
12000
8000
20000
12000
8000
20000
.79

Sl. No. Category of work Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Land development works of SC-ST, BPL & IAY beneficiary lands Description of Works Shivappa-pampanna 0 Durugamma-Earappa 0 Yallappa-Earappa 0 Huligemmma-yallappa 0 ChandrappaMalleshappa Earanagouda Basavanagouda KaribasayyaChannabasayya BasammaThippamma Chidanandappapamanna Kariyappa Earappa 10000 10000 0 0 10000 0 10000 660000 440000 1100000 0 684000 456000 1140000 10000 0 10000 1354000 896000 2250000 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 12000 0 0 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 0 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 0 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 0 12000 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 Labor Alabanur GP Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total 8000 20000 12000 8000 20000 Labor Total Material Total
12000
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Total III Connecting Road to the farms Formation of new formation of internal roads road from main road and farm roads and intera to Navagram village village roads 1 (Joining road)
540000 360000 0 900000 0 540000 360000 900000
. 80
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Total Material
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Description of Sl. No. Category of work Works Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total formation of internal roads Formation of interior and farm roads and intera roads in Navagram 540000 360000 2 village roads village 0 900000 0 formation of internal roads Formation of Main and farm roads and intera roads in Navagrama 540000 360000 3 village roads village 0 900000 0 formation of internal roads Improvement to the and farm roads and intera Giniwar to 180000 120000 4 village roads yaddaladoddi road 0 300000 0 Improvement to the formation of internal roads road going from and farm roads and intera 180000 120000 Thimmapur to CSF village roads 5 No.2 0 300000 0 formation of internal roads Formation of interior and farm roads and intera roads in Indira colony 90000 60000 6 village roads in Thimmapur village 0 150000 0 formation of internal roads Formation of CC and farm roads and intera Road in RH No.5 120000 80000 7 village roads (Interior road) 0 200000 0 formation of internal roads Formation of CC and farm roads and intera Road from ST Oni to 120000 80000 8 village roads Narayanappa House 0 0 200000 formation of internal roads Formation of road and farm roads and intera from Budiwal to 90000 60000 9 village roads Kannari 0 0 150000 Formation formation of internal roads /Improvement of road and farm roads and intera 96000 64000 from Main road to village roads 10 Basavanagouda farm 0 0 160000 Formation / formation of internal roads Improvement of road and farm roads and intera 60000 40000 from Udbal (J) Camp village roads 11 to Dasara Nala 0 0 100000 formation of internal roads Removing of Jungle and farm roads and intera and adding Maram to 180000 120000 12 village roads the road used by 0 0 300000 Final Report (February 2010 March 2011) .81
Labor
Total
540000 360000
900000
540000 360000
900000
180000 120000
300000
180000 120000
300000
90000
60000
150000
120000
80000
200000
120000
80000
200000
90000
60000
150000
96000
64000
160000
60000
40000
100000
180000 120000
300000

Sl. No. Category of work Description of Works farmers for going to farms Formation / Improvement of road from Vala-Bellary road to Sannamma House Levelling the area where clothes are washed by the public Construction/Improve ment of Road form Stream to Maldinnin Camp Construction of Kannari to Uppal Road Construction of road from Vala-Bellary road to Nedalikke Hoguva Road Construction of road from Goudara Hosa Hola to Karki Holakke Construction of raod going to Waddara Hola Construction of road from Vala-Bellary main road to hatcholleru Via road Badiger land, Hanumanthappa, Yankappa, Mudiyappa, Kariyappa, Basappa, Mariyappa, Gajjalagatta Dani Labor Alabanur GP Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total Labor Total Material Total
13
formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads formation of internal roads and farm roads and intera village roads
60000 0 0 24000 0 120000 80000 200000 126000 84000 210000 180000 120000 300000 180000 120000 300000 60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40000 100000 16000 40000 24000 16000 40000 60000 40000 100000
14
15
120000
80000
200000
16
126000
84000
210000
17
180000 120000
300000
18
180000 120000
300000
19
60000
40000
100000
20
60000
40000
100000
Formation of interior village roads and farm roads and intra-village roads 21
120000
80000 200000 0 0 120000 80000 200000
. 82
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Total Material
Sl. No.
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Alabanur GP Badarli Gp Madsirwar Description of Category of work Works Labor Material Total Labor Material Total Labor Material Total lands and others
Labor
Total
Formation of interior village roads and farm roads and intra-village roads 22
Formation of interior village roads and farm roads and intra-village roads 23 Formation of interior village Dalapathi Earanna, roads and farm roads and Valabellary Tata land, intra-village roads Yankappa & others 24 Formation of interior village Pompanagouda, roads and farm roads and Rajashekar, intra-village roads Rudrappa and Others 25 Formation of new formation of internal village road from main road roads and farm roads and to Navagram village intera village roads 26 (Joining road) formation of internal village Improvement to the roads and farm roads and interior roads in RH intera village roads No.5 (in village) 27 formation of internal village Apply Maram to the roads and farm roads and interior roads of intera village roads Thimmapur vilalge 28 Formation of CC formation of internal village Road from Meti roads and farm roads and Basavanagouda intera village roads 29 House to Agasara Final Report (February 2010 March 2011)
Yamunappa Agasar, Harijan yallamma, Shivaraj, Balaganur Siddayya, Earanna kattiger, Pompapathi, Katteppa & Durgappa and others Many small and marginal farmers lands
120000 0 300000 200000 0 90000 0 540000 360000 0 540000 360000 0 90000 0 60000 0 40000 100000 60000 0 0 .83 60000 150000 900000 900000 60000 150000 500000 0
80000 200000 120000 80000 200000
300000 200000
500000
90000
60000
150000
540000 360000
900000
540000 360000
900000
90000
60000
150000
0 40000 100000
60000
40000
100000
60000
40000
100000

Sl. No. Category of work Description of Works Mukkanna House Labor Alabanur GP Material Total Badarli Gp Labor Material Total Labor Madsirwar Material Total Labor Total Material Total
30
31
32
33
34 IV 1
Formation of CC formation of internal village Road from Gude kallu roads and farm roads and to Dodda Veerana intera village roads gouda farm Formation of CC formation of internal village Road from roads and farm roads and Jawalagera intera village roads Yankanagouda to Pampathi farm Formation / formation of internal village Improvement of road roads and farm roads and from Bellary road to intera village roads Pampanna farm formation of internal village Construction/Improve roads and farm roads and ment of CC Road intera village roads formation of internal village Construction of road roads and farm roads and in JD Road intera village roads Total Tree plantation No work is executed Tree plantation during the year Total GRNAT TOTAL
60000 0 0
40000 100000 60000 40000 100000
60000 0 0 60000 0 120000 80000 200000 60000 40000 0 0
40000 100000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000 60000 40000 100000
120000
80000
200000
100000 0 1026000 684000 1710000 3810000 2540000 6350000 0

0
0 990000 660000 1650000
60000 40000 100000 5826000 3884000 9710000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 9750000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2406000 1314000
3720000 5850000 3900000
3042000 2028000 5070000
11298000 7242000 18540000
. 84
Annex 6 Vegetable cultivation details

Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Name of the farmer with father name Amreshappa S/o Eranna Yankappa S/o Hanumantha Ambanna S/o Huleshappa G.Veeresh S/o Yankappa Amresh S/o Karibasappa Name of Name of GP Village Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Kannari Kannari Kannari Kannari Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Total land Area Total holding of decided for Sy No Land at Water source Cell No farmer veg/ SRI Demo plot (A-G) (A-G) 9663235680 9 1--0 5--0 Pump set 1.00 11 12 137 105 54 1--0 0--20 0--27 0--20 1--20 0--10 0--10 64 69 1--00 1--20 1--00 146 20 gunts 3--0 3--0 0--27 8--0 5--20 2--0 2--0 29--30 7--08 3--00 20 acres Pump set,Bore Pump set,Bore Canal TBP Pump set Water Tank Water Tank/TBP Pump set Pump set TBP, Water Tank TBP, Water Tank Pump set 1.00 0.50 0.75 0.50 1.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.50 1.50 0.5 8105996026
9008947041 9900416111 9900416111 9972611691 9901088508 9908454612
Name of the Group Anjaneyya Agriculture Interesting Group Anjaneyya Agriculture Interesting Group Anjaneyya Agriculture Interesting Group Anjaneyya Agriculture Interesting Group Shivashakthi Agriculture Interesting Group
Caste Lingayat SC-Harijan SC-Harijan Lingayat Madiwar (Gen) Kurubur(Gen) Bedre Lingayat Lingayat Namasudra Namasudra upper
Shivashakthi Agriculture Basappa S/o Gadeppa Interesting Group Shivashakthi Agriculture Interesting Group Dodda Ambanna S/o Sanna Hanumantha
Shivashakthi Agriculture Vishwanath Reddy Interesting Group S/oDoddabasangouda Someshwar Agriculture Interesting Group Someshwar Agriculture Interesting Group Someshwar Agriculture Interesting Group Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Doddan Gouda Bimal Sarkar S/o Haripado Amal Sarkar S/o Adaitya Sarkar
Belagurki/In Alabanur dira Nagar Belagurki/In Alabanur dira Nagar Belagurki/In Alabanur dira Nagar
Hanumanthappa s/o Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar devanna

Sl. No. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Name of the Group Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Name of the farmer with father name Shankrappa s/o balappa Name of Name of GP Village Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Caste sc madival kurabar sc madival sc sc sc kabber sc kabber kabber kurabar Total land Area Total holding of decided for Sy No Land at Water source farmer veg/ SRI Demo plot (A-G) (A-G) 120 20 gunts 5 acres Pump set 0.5 120 121 132 143 133 134 134 654 51 37 1 95 30 gunts 20 gunts 1 acres 1 acres 1 acres 20 gunts 20 gunts 2 acres 1 acres 20 gunts 10 gunts 20 gunts 10 acres 10 acres 6 7acres 10 acres 12 acres 4 acres 6 acres 9 acres 10 arces 20 acres 5 acres Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set 0.75 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.5 9741971719 9980083035 9620049912 8951500209 9980329672 9449689819 Cell No 9902793757
Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Kariyappa s/o basappa Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Village AIG Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Gomarsi Vilalge AIG Udbal EJ village AIG Udbal EJ village AIG Udbal EJ village AIG Udbal EJ village AIG Budihal Village AIG Pampapati s/o mariyappa Candrappa s/o malleshappa Hampayya s/o virabadrappa Mahadevappa s/o duragappa Huligemma d/o yallappa Yallappa d/o huligemma Pampapati s/o duragappa Yamanappa s/o yamanappa Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Gomarsi Gomarsi Gomarsi Gomarsi Gomarsi Udbal EJ Udbal EJ Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar Mad-Sirwar
Gangappa s/o tippanna Udbal EJ Veeresh s/o narasappa Udbal EJ Shivarayappa s/o nagavaleppa Budihal
. 86
JANAKALYAN
SOCIETY
Sl. No. 26 27
Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur Total land Area Total Name of the farmer Name of holding of decided for Name of the Group Name of GP Caste Sy No Land at Water source with father name Village farmer veg/ SRI Demo plot (A-G) (A-G) Budihal Village AIG Mallappa s/o Budihal Mad-Sirwar kurabar 82 20 gunts 6 acres Pump set 0.5 shivarayappa Budihal Village AIG Virupanna s/o ramanna Abanna Nayak s/o basanna Budihal upper uppar other uppar othres uppar others uppar kurabar uppar kurabar Mad-Sirwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar Giniwar sc Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli 95 81 81 13 81 116 86 80 107 80 107 5 20 gunts 1 acrea 1 acres 1acres 1 acres 1 acres 20 gunts 20 gunts 20 gunts 10 gunts 20 gunts 1 acres 4 acres 4 acres 4 acres 4acres 4acres 2acres 1 acres 2 acres 1 acres 2 acres 1 acres 6 acres Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set Pump set 0.5 0.5 0.25 1 0.25 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.25 0.5 1
Cell No 9902152696
28 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG)
9972446304 9008721507 9945707388
29 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu kumar swamy pujari s/o (AIG) hanumappa 30 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG) k. vereshappa gouda s/o siddareddyappa
31 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu Tippanna s/o Bimanna (AIG) 32 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG) mallana gouda s/o mallareddyappa
33 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu Devanna mulimani s/o (AIG) Nagappa 34 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG) 35 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG) karilingappa s/o linganna yankoba s/o yallappa
9480444947
36 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu shankrappa kambli s/o (AIG) nagappa 37 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu yankoba s/o sheshappa (AIG) 38 Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu (AIG) Ambresh s/o yamanappa
.87

Sl. No. 39 40 41 42 43 44 Name of the Group Name of the farmer with father name Name of Name of GP Village Caste Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Total land Area Total holding of decided for Sy No Land at Water source farmer veg/ SRI Demo plot (A-G) (A-G) 40/A 2 acres 4 ACRES FARM POND 2 68 41 65.29 20 gunts 20 gunts 10 gunts 2 acres 2.20 ACRES 4 acres 4 acres 1.2 2.2 2 acra 2.28 FARM POND FARM POND FARM POND FARM POND FARM POND Pump set Pump set Pump set 2 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 9731500739 9845039826 9008727487 Cell No 8971511286 9480169375 9901778774
Durgadevi Krishi SARASWATI MANDAL KSHATRIYA RH Colony Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) W/O SATYAPRIYA No.5 Durgadevi Krishi MADHUSUDHAN S/O KSHATRIYA RH Colony Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) PAGAL HALDAR No.5 Durgadevi Krishi BISHWANAT BAR S/O Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) GOVINDA BAR Durgadevi Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) Durgadevi Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) Durgadevi Krishi Aasaktara Gumpu(AIG) MALO RH Colony No.5
Khadu Mandal s/o KSHATRIYA RH Colony Fhanibhusan mandal No.5 Jagadish bawali s/o KSHATRIYA RH Colony Panchu bawali No.5 Suresh biswas s/o sachin biswas namasudra RH Colony No.5 Haretanur Haretanur Haretanur
89/100 10 gunts 61bp3/4 5 gunta 16 17 16 20 guntas 20 guntas 20 guntas
45 Sri.Channa Basava krishi Sharanappa yeldoni s/o Lingayat Aasakta Gumpu (AIG) Pampanna 46 Sri.Channa Basava krishi Amresh s/o Tippanna Aasakta Gumpu (AIG) 47 Sri.Channa Basava krishi Aasakta Gumpu (AIG) Shiwangouda s/o Pampanna Nayak Lingayat
. 88
Annex 7 List of newly elected Gram Panchayat Members

Sl. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Name of the GP member Nagamma E. Amaresh Annapurnamma Mallikarjun R Manappa Arunkumar Pakiramma Basavaraj Jinnad Husenappa Purnamma Erappa Parvatamma Kadappa Khadarbi Shivareddy Jilanipasha Basanagouda Ramesh Nagamma Gangamma BasavaraJ Bheemanna Aratemma Lakshmi Sivarayappa Shankramma Hanumantha Somappa Ranganagouda Lingamma Shivalingamma Channabasava Somappa Durugamma Rajashekar Sagarappa Husenamma Adappa Amarappa Devendrappa Yankamma Sharanabasava Kupendra nayak Basamma Govindappa Amaramma Narad bairagi Sharalamandal Sarala Uppalappa Uppalappa Gurulingamma Sridevi Mallayya Basamma Village Alabanur Gram Panchayat Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Belagurki Belagurki Belagurki Belagurki Belagurki Kannari Kannari BR Camp BR Camp Madasirwar Gram Panchayat Gomarci Gomarci Gomarci Gomarci Udbal Udbal Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Budihal Budihal Budihal Budihal Badarli Gram Panchayat Valabellry Valabellry Valabellry Badarli Badarli Badarli Haretanur Haretanur Haretanur Timmapur Timmapur Timmapur Timmapur Hedaginal Hedaginal Hedaginal Hedaginal R.H.no.5 R.H.no.5 R.H.no.5 R.H.no.5 Ginivar Ginivar Ginivar Ginivar Ginivar Ginivar Gram Panchayat Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Alabanur Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Madasirwar Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Badarli Designation G.P. Pres Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member G.P.Pre Member Member Member Member G.P.Pre Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member

Annex 8 Field Team responsible for making the program a grand success Sl. No. Designation Name of the staff Prasen Raptan Pranab Bala 2 Training Organizer Basavarajaiah Swami Prasen Raptan 3 Agriculture Specialist Sudhanya Sikdar Manjushree N 4 GPO Alabanur Ramesh Pranab Mukherjee Uma Rajur Suresh 5 GPO Badarli Amaresh Prahlad Biswas Basavaraj N 6 GPO Madsirwar Anjinappa Venkatesh A 7 Accounts Officer Manojit Biswas MSW SSLC PUC MSW MSW B.Com DCA 1 year 4 years 3 years 1 year 5 years 5 years 4 years Qualification B. Tech. (Ag.Engg.), PGDMN B.Com. LLB B.Com. B. Tech.(Ag.Engg.), PGDMN VII PUC MSW PUC BSW PUC Experience in NGO 14 years 6 years 23 years 14 years 7 years 5 years 1 year 11 years 8 years 1 year Period of service 01.02.2010 - till date 01.02.2010 30.11.2010 01.09.2010 - till date 01.02.2010 30.11.2010 01.08.2010 - till date 01.02.2010 31.10.2010 1.11.2010 31.1.2011 1.12.2010 till date 1.2.2010 30.8.2010 1.9.2010 31.10.2010 1.11.2010 31.1.2011 1.2.2011 till date 01.02.2010 31.10.2010 1.11.2010 31.1.2011 1.2.2011 till date 01.02.2010 - till date 01.02.2010 - till date
1 Project Officer
8 Documentation Officer Hulagappa B
. 90

Leveraging NREGA Funds To Create Productive Agriculture Assets To Make Agriculture Profit-Making & Sustainable Vol V

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Leveraging NREGA Funds To Create Productive Agriculture Assets To Make Agriculture Profit-Making & Sustainable Vol V

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Supported a Livelihood Improvement by Leveraging NREGA funds to create productive agriculture assets

February 2010 March 2011

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

Chapter I Progress during reporting period

Chapter II Learning from Field

Chapter III Action Plan

Additional Information from the field

An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur

Raichur District & NREGA at a Glance

Deodurga Lingasugur Manvi Raichur Sindhanur Total %

1508 1948 1791 1541 1598 8386

112245 162628 166063 220675 180229 841840 50.42

110212 158414 164656 214705 179935 827922 49.58

222457 321042 330719 435380 360164 1669762

200463 247478 293106 208976 298902 1248925 74.80

21994 73564 37613 226404 61262 420837 33.70

44349 68412 62239 82649 59630 317279 19.00

74910 51332 77956 52129 46715 303042 18.15

173 186 164 147 160 830

36709 54074 59904 81205 65763

51.73 66.28 54.79 66.28 65.46

27.20 36.27 30.71 45.45 37.81 36.84

39.56 51.39 42.78 56.05 51.56 49.54

Final Report (February 2010 March 2011)

Area (Sq. Km)

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

Cumulative Person-days generated (Till the reporting month)

DEVADURGA LINGSUGUR MANVI RAICHUR SINDHNUR

5249 5071 9889 5854 6223 32286 19%

11846 4025 11498 6114 5538 39021 22%

17913 22718 27610 15299 19038 102578 59%

35008 31814 48997 27267 30799 173885

34086 29922 46984 24364 40587 175943

33247 29320 45240 23830 40002 171639 98%

4650 4072 1999 2223 1457 14401

302903 240619 558997 263144 438814 1804477 17%

737435 218936 584813 263718 391811 2196713 21%

1121172 1513003 1537867 714982 1429817 6316841 61%

2161510 1972558 2681677 1241844 2260442 10318031

987932 747893 1114715 567975 822719 4241234 41%

2828 1262 1535 1089 3959 10673 6%

330 22 673 157 1377 2559

An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives

No. of Disabled beneficiary individuals

Cumulative No. of HH issued job cards (Till the reporting month)

167 69 1228 163 111 1738

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur

Journey of Janakalyan through NREGA

Final Report (February 2010 March 2011)

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

Problems of tail-end farmers and Solutions through NREGA

An initiative of JANAKALYAN to make NREGA successful in realizing its twin objectives

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur

Productive Agriculture Asset Creation by leveraging funds from NREGA

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Mumbai

Leveraging NREGA Funds to make Agriculture Profit-making & Sustainable in Raichur