P. 1
Economy Finance of Pi Go Rich

Economy Finance of Pi Go Rich

|Views: 15|Likes:

More info:

Published by: Anthony Charles Dallo on Aug 01, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





enjoying a more or less leisured life, have turned to

some form of productive labour. What these extra

services amount to in the aggregate it is impossible

to say^ but they are certainly considerable and must

involve an appreciable increase in real income to

set against the extra costs of war. It is probable

that in Germany this resource has been invoked

in greater measure than in the United Kingdom


and, if we so desire, it is in our power to make an

increased call upon it. The alternative form of

drawing on the present is the economising of con-

sumption. The general character of this is obvious

and requires no explanation.

To the above analysis one qualifying consideration

must be added. Hitherto it has been tacitly assumed

that the distinction between drawing upon the future

and drawing upon the present is always clear-ait

and sharp. In fact it is, in some circumstances,

blurred. After we have descended a certain distance

along the scale of wealth, a check to consumption

or to leisure no longer affects the present alone.

It reacts injuriously upon the general efficiency of

the people affected, and, hence, strikes indirectly

at their future productive power. At a later stage

of our inquiry this fact will be seen to have an

important bearing upon practical policy.






Just as in Section 6 we inquired whether and how

far it was desirable for the Government to intervene

with a view to directing the choice of individuals

between different sorts of economies^ so now we

have to inquire whether and how far it is proper

for them to interfere with the choice that individuals

make between drawing on the future and drawing

on the present. Before, however, this inquiry can

be successfully undertaken, it is necessary to dispose

of a wide-spread popular error. Many persons

believe that, so soon as the method of collecting

money for the State is decided upon, the choice of

individuals between drawing upon the future and

drawing upon the present is absolutely and finally

determined. Whatever part of the cost of war is

met by taxes is, they hold, necessarily paid for in

the present ; while whatever part is met by loans

is necessarily thrown upon the future. What has

been said in the preceding section should, however,

already have made it plain that this opinion is in-

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->