EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
APPENDIX D ELASTIC PARAMETERS D1. General. The magnitudes of soil elastic distortion or immediate settlement for practical applications are evaluated from the elastic soil parameters Young’s modulus Es , shear modulus Gs and Poisson’s ratio ν s . For most practical applications the foundation soil is heterogeneous or multilayered in which the elastic parameters can vary significantly from layer to layer. D2. Elastic Young’s Modulus. Young’s elastic modulus is commonly used for estimation of settlement from static loads. Suitable values of the elastic modulus Es as a function of depth may be estimated from empirical correlations, results of laboratory tests on undisturbed specimens and results of field tests. a. Definition. Materials that are truly elastic obey Hooke’s law in which each equal increment of applied uniaxial stress σz causes a proportionate increase in strain ε z (D1) where E is Young’s modulus of elasticity, Table D1. Figure D1 illustrates the stress path for the uniaxial (UT) and other test methods. An elastic material regains its initial dimensions following removal of the applied stress. (1) Application to soil. Hooke’s law, which is applicable to homogeneous and isotropic materials, was originally developed from the observed elastic behavior of metal bars in tension. Soil is sometimes assumed to behave linearly elastic under relatively small loads. A partially elastic material obeys Hooke’s law during loading, but this material will not gain its initial dimensions following removal of the applied stress. These materials are nonlinear and include most soils, especially foundation soil supporting heavy structures that apply their weight only once. (2) Assumption of Young’s elastic modulus. Soils tested in a conventional triaxial compression (CTCT) device under constant lateral stress will yield a tangent elastic modulus Et equivalent with Young’s modulus. The soil modulus Es is assumed approximately equal to Young’s modulus in practical applications of the theory of elasticity for computation of settlement. (3) Relationship with other elastic parameters. Table D2 relates the elastic modulus E with the shear modulus G , bulk modulus K and constrained modulus Ed . These parameters are defined in Table D1. b. Empirical Correlations. The elastic undrained modulus may be estimated from the undrained shear strength Cu by Es for clay (D2) where Es = Young’s soil modulus, tsf Kc = correlation factor, Figure D2 Cu = undrained shear strength, tsf
D1
EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
D2
.
EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Figure D1. Examples of stress paths for different tests (Refer to Table D1 for descriptions of tests)
D3
.
tsf
Constrained modulus
Ed . tsf
Figure D2. Table D3 illustrates some typical values for the elastic modulus. Chart for estimating constant Kc to determine the elastic modulus Es = KcCu from the undrained shear strength (after Figure 320. tsf
Relationship
Bulk Modulus
K .
D4
. TM 58181)
The values of Kc as a function of the overconsolidation ratio and plasticity index PI have been determined from field measurements and are therefore not affected by soil disturbance compared with measurements on undisturbed soil samples.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Table D2 Relationships Between Elastic Parameters
Parameter Shear modulus G .
(2) Reload modulus. The axial stress may then be reduced to zero and the cycle repeated until the reload curve shows no further increase in slope. may reduce the measured modulus compared with the in situ modulus if confining pressures are not applied to the soil specimen. An appropriate measure of Es is the reload tangent modulus that approaches the asymptotic value at large cycles. Figure D3 (item 14). Triaxial unconsolidated undrained (Q or UU) compression tests may be performed on the best available undisturbed specimens at confining pressures equal to the total vertical overburden pressure σo for that specimen when in the field using the Q test procedure described in EM 111021906.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Table D3 Typical Elastic Moduli
Soil Clay Very soft clay Soft clay Medium clay Stiff clay. An appropriate measure of Es is the initial tangent modulus Eti = 1/a where a is the intercept of a plot of strain/deviator stress versus strain. The specimen is initially fully consolidated to an isotropic confining pressure equal to the vertical overburden pressure σo for that specimen in the field. Refer to
D5
. s 5 50 200 500 250 1000 
tsf 50 200 500 1000 2000 2000
sand sand sand and gravel sand
100 250 1000 250

250 1000 2000 2000
c. Field Tests. d. decrease the effective stress in the specimen and reduce the stiffness and strength. The elastic modulus is sensitive to soil disturbance which may increase pore water pressure and. The elastic modulus may be estimated from empirical and semiempirical relationships based on results of field soil tests. Laboratory Soils Testing. silty clay Sandy clay Clay shale Sand Loose Dense Dense Silty
E . therefore. Fissures. Figure D4. (1) Initial hyperbolic tangent modulus. Laboratory Tests on Cohesive Soil. The R test procedure described in EM 111021906 may be used except as follows: stress is increased to the magnitude estimated for the field loading condition. A triaxial consolidated undrained (R or CU) compression test may be performed on the best available undisturbed specimens. The tangent modulus at 1/2 of the maximum applied stress is determined for each loading cycle and plotted versus the number of cycles. which may have little influence on field settlement.
Geotechnical Investigations. for more information on in situ tests. The plate load test performed in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method D 1194.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Figure D3. "Bearing Capacity of Soil for Static Loads on Spread Footings" is used to determine the relationship between settlement and plate pressure qp . (1) Plate load test. Figure D5.
Hyperbolic simulation of stressstrain relationships
EM 111011804. The elastic modulus Es is found from the slope of the curve ∆ρ/∆qp
(D3)
D6
.
psi = Poisson’s ratio. inches/psi = diameter of plate.4 = slope of settlement versus plate pressure. π/4 for circular plates
D7
. 0.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Figure D4.
Elastic modulus from cyclic load tests
where Es νs Bp Iw = Young’s soil modulus. inches = influence factor.
D8
. The constrained modulus empirically related with the cone tip bearing resistance by
2Bp
beneath
Ed
has been
(D4) where Ed = Constrained modulus.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Figure D5. tsf αc = correlation factor depending on soil type and the cone bearing resistance. The undrained shear strength Cu is related to qc by
(D5) where Cu qc σo Nk = = = = undrained shear strength. Graphical solution of soil elastic modulus Es from the plate load test. but can increase substantially for overconsolidated sand. (2) Cone penetration test (CPT). tsf total overburden pressure. Iw = π/4 for circular rigid plate of diameter Bp .σo where σo is the total overburden pressure. A typical value for clays is αc = 10 when used with the net cone resistance qc . tsf cone factor
The cone factor often varies from 10 to 20 and can be greater. tsf cone tip resistance. ν s = Poisson’s ratio
This elastic modulus is representative of soil within a depth of the plate. tsf A typical value for sands is αc = 3 . Table D4 qc = cone tip bearing resistance.
4 to 1 2 to 4 1. fraction
(3) Standard penetration test (SPT). Sampler is driven 18 inches and blows counted the last 12 inches.5 0. tsf N = average blow count per foot in the stratum. tsf
Water Content. number of blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches to drive a standard sampler (1.MH) Organic silt Organic clay peat Sand
50 to 100 100 to 200 >200
1.42" ID.5 1 + D2 r
<50 >100
Clayey sand Silty sand Chalk
*
3 to 6 1 to 2 20 to 30 2 to 4
Note:
Dr = relative density.5 to 4 1 to 1.00" OD) one foot. ft D = depth of embedment of footing. 2.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Table D4 Correlation Factor αc (Data from Item 44)
Soil Lean clay (CL)
Resistance <7 7 to 20 >20 <20 >20 <20 <12 <7
qc . ft Equation D6 was developed from information in the literature and original settlement observations without consideration of the energy of the hammer.5 3 to 6 1 to 3 2 to 6 2 to 8
Silt (ML) Plastic silt clay (CH. percent
αc 3 to 8 2 to 5 1 to 2. The elastic modulus in sand may be estimated directly from the blow count by (item 60) (D6) where Es = Young’s soil modulus. B = width of footing. An alternative method of estimating the elastic modulus for footing foundations on clean sand or sand and gravel is (after item 12)
D9
.
as shown in Figure D6. The pressure and volume change measurements are corrected for membrane resistance and volume losses leading to the corrected pressuremeter curve.
Example corrected preboring pressuremeter curve
D10
. Figure D6. ∆R/Ro .
Nave = average measured blow count in depth blows/ft
(4) Pressuremeter test (PMT). H = B below footing. The selfboring pressuremeter should in theory lead to a less disturbed hole than the preboring pressuremeter. The preboring pressuremeter consists of a cylindrical probe of radius Ro containing an inflatable balloon lowered into a borehole to a given depth. The selfboring pressuremeter curve is characteristic of
Figure D6. The pressure required to inflate the balloon and probe against the side of the borehole and the volume change of the probe are recorded. The selfboring pressuremeter includes cutting blades at the head of the device with provision to permit drilling fluids to circulate and carry cuttings up to the surface. The preboring pressuremeter curve indicates a pressuremeter modulus Ei that initially increases with increasing radial dimensional change.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
Preloaded sand: Normally loaded sand or sand and gravel: where Em
Em = 420 + 10Nave
(D7a)
Em = 194 + 8Nave
(D7b)
= deformation modulus.
characteristic of a sufficiently small unloadreload cycle. tons/ft3 depth of foundation below ground surface. ft width of mat. length of mat. Figure 310.33 change in pressure measured by the pressuremeter. ft center settlement from the Kay and Cavagnaro method. tsf bearing pressure. The pressuremeter modulus may be evaluated from the gradient of the unloadreload cycle by (ASTM 4719) (D8) where νs ∆P Rpo ∆Rpm ∆Rp = = = = soil Poisson’s ratio. 0.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
an initially high pressuremeter modulus Ei that decreases with increasing volume change without the initial increasing modulus shown in the figure.
D11
. The unloadreload modulus should be determined on the plastic portion of the pressuremeter curve. the gradient will be 2GUR (item 23). The following two methods are recommended for calculating an equivalent elastic modulus of cohesive soil for estimating settlement of mats and footings. Equivalent Elastic Modulus. The pressuremeter modulus is a measure of twice the shear modulus. (1) Kay and Cavagnaro approximation. If the soil is perfectly elastic in unloading. inches
e. may be calculated by (item 31) The equivalent elastic modulus
E* s
(D9) where E* s q R L B ρc = = = = = = equivalent elastic modulus. inches = change in radius between selected straight portions of the pressuremeter curve. ft kR/(Eo + kDb) elastic soil modulus at the ground surface. tsf equivalent mat radius. ft
(2) Semiempirical method. tsf radius of probe. tsf z
Equation D10 was developed from results of a parametric study using Equation D9 (item 29). The equivalent elastic modulus of a soil with elastic modulus increasing linearly with depth may be estimated by (D10) where k Es D n Eo = = = = = constant relating soil elastic modulus Es with depth Eo + kz. inches change in radius from Rpo at midpoint of straight portion of the pressuremeter curve.
A standard procedure for evaluation of Poisson’s ratio for soil does not exist.40. A reasonable overall value for ν s is 0.EM 111011904 30 Sep 90
(3) Gibson model.
D12
. Table D2 illustrates the relationship of the shear modulus with Young’s elastic E and bulk modulus K . Evaluation by Dynamic Tests. Relationships with Other Parameters.49.25 to 0. Poisson’s ratio for unsaturated soils usually vary from 0. G may be used for analysis of set
D3. b. TM 58181. c.49 with saturated soils approaching 0. D4. Normal variations in elastic modulus of foundation soils at a site are more significant in settlement calculations than errors in Poisson’s ratio. The shear modulus tlement from dynamic loads. Table D1. The shear modulus may be evaluated from dynamic tests after methodology of Chapter 17.25 to 0. Poisson’s Ratio.
a. The equivalent modulus of a soil with elastic modulus increasing linearly with depth and Eo = 0 is (item 19) (D11) where B is the minimum width of the foundation. Poisson’s ratio ν s for soil usually varies from 0.40. Procedures for Foundation Design of Buildings and Other Structures (Except Hydraulic Structures). Shear Modulus. Shear stresses applied to an elastic soil will cause a shear distortion illustrated by the simple shear test (SST). Definition. ft.