This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Naoya Makino 100106040
English 1127 Section 005
Trevor Newland Langara College 1 August 2007
Stephen Millhauser has written a short story titled “The Knife Thrower”, describing a knife throwing show in a small and peaceful town. Hensch—a knife thrower—is famous for an excessive show, and the audience is fascinated with his controversial show; its show ends up with a possibility of death of a young woman’s participant. In this story, Millhauser shows the reader, metaphorically, society’s numbness to violence in the real world in many stages: the progression of the knife thrower’s act as harmful media in society, the passive and voyeuristic audience response in the theatre as society’s lack of active response and voyeuristic behavior in society, and the audience’s participation as indicative of society’s participation in morally questionable activities. The excessive performance of the knife thrower (Hensch) represents detrimental media in society. In Hensch’s performance, he harms people as knife throwing approaches to the climax. Generally speaking, a knife thrower is not supposed
to harm people, and harming people is controversial in society: however, he purposely “crosses the line” (11) because he knows that “the realm of forbidden things” (11) grab audience’s attention. This indicates that Hensch shows harmful knife throwing to get people’s attentions; often media broadcasts violent shows to grab people’s attention. James Potter states that “extraspecies fighting … generates energy”: “the media often represents such stimuli” (11). This means that media broadcasts aggressive shows to hold people’s attentions, and Hensch uses the same way to catch the audience’s awareness. Millhauser expresses, metaphorically, that Hensch’s radical performance symbolizes harmful media in society. Even though Hensch, and media in society, progress excessively, the audience, and people in society, respond passively. When Susan Parker stands up to participate in the show, the audience “[remains] silent” (12). While the audience knows that stabbing people is morally questionable, the audience—a silent mob—responds inactively. In other words, even though the audience thinks this harmful show is morally debatable, no one stands to stop the show. This audience’s response shows that the audience watches stabbing the participant without being involved: “an onlooker” (Gabler par.7). This disengaged behavior applies to people in society. In Galber’s article “Behind The Curtain Of TV Voyeurism”, a Harvard professor Robert Putnam states that people in
society “have increasingly become disengaged from one another…and social involvement” (par.11). This is especially true when people are watching broadcasts; they watch TV shows passively without being involved in its events. Metaphorically, the story connects the inactive audience in the show and those people in society who watch TV shows with no involvement. Millhauser symbolizes the audience in the theater as people in society and the audience’s lack of involvement as people in society’s disengagement from others. Not only does the audience watch the show passively, the audience’s behavior is voyeuristic, signifying people’s voyeuristic that of society. For instance, while the audience watches the knife throwing, they tend to behave “like pretending [he/she has not] noticed” (6); the audience watches his aggressive show secretly as every audience is fascinated with a “faint flutter of anxious excitement” (8). That is, the audience gets excited about watching the participants’ suffering. Therefore, instead of involved in the violent show, the audience voyeuristically observes morally questionable entertainment. This audience’s voyeuristic behavior represents that people in society enjoy watching and get excited about ethically problematic TV shows. As an example, one of the most popular TV shows “Survivor” and “Big Brother” are “making the other side of glass accessible to anyone who is willing to barter his or her privacy for it”(Gabler par.5).
This popular TV programs let people watch others’ privacy and suffering, fascinated with “the wicked kick of peering through the keyhole”: voyeuristic behaviors (Gabler par.8). People in society and the audience in the theater “fulfill [their] desires of” excitement by peeking controversial shows (Ponce 102). These similar behaviors of people in society and the audience in the theater indicate that both of them voyeuristically involve controversial shows to get excited, secretly, about suffering others. Millhauser says symbolically that both the audience in the story and people in society are fascinated with watching morally questionable shows. In addition to the audience’s passive as well as voyeuristic behaviors, natural human desires of belonging to an elite group support the knife thrower’s success and controversial shows, which reflect how society in general participates in morally questionable activities. In the story, many young women volunteer to participate the knife thrower’s show, wanting to be “wounded by the master and to bear his scar proudly” (4). This desire implies that young women beautify his harmful shows. They know involving in this harmful show is contentious; nevertheless, they are “eager to” (13) take part in “master[’s]” controversial activities (4). Therefore, those people support his dangerous show by encouraging him and glorifying the activity. Due to the desires of being famous, these women get behind “forbidden things” (11). Like those
young women in the theatre, many people in society support morally questionable activities unconsciously. In fact, an abundant number of people visit pornographic websites everyday; in 2000, Robert McNatt reports on the Business Week that sex industry in U.S. “generates over $1 billion annually” (10). This case proves that those morally questionable groups, like the knife thrower, are able to continue their activities because of a crowd of supporters (like the young women and the audience). Figuratively, Millhauser tells the reader that plenty of supporters—the audience and the young women—allow the knife thrower and morally questionable groups in society to accomplish harmful activities. In summary, Millhauser argues in his story “The Knife Thrower” that society’s lack of sensation to violence by showing, symbolically, harmful Hensch’s knife throwing, the audience’s passive as well as voyeuristic attitudes, and the audience’s unconscious supports to his controversial show. Because of those people’s behaviors and their desires, his show and media in society have “really gone too far” (18). Millhauser asks whether people let media become more aggressive with their inner desires or if they should close eyes and open mouth with courage; still today, a silent mob keeps walking with “agitation and dismay” (18).
Gabler, Neal. "Behind the curtain of TV voyeurism. (Cover story)." Christian Science Monitor 92.158 (07 July 2000): 1. Academic Search Elite. EBSCO. [Langara College Library], [Vancouver], [British Columbia]. 26 July 2007. <https://ezproxy.langara.bc.ca:2443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/logi n.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=3292815&site=ehost-live>. McNatt, Robert. "EVERYTHING HAS A PRICE..." Business Week (10 July 2000): 1010. Ponce, Pedro. ""a game we no longer understood". Theatrical Audiences in the Fiction of Steven Millhauser." 90-109. Review of Contemporary Fiction, 2006. Academic Search Elite. EBSCO. [Langara College Library], [Vancouver], [British Columbia]. 29 July 2007. <https://ezproxy.langara.bc.ca:2443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/logi
n.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=21409710&site=ehost-live>. Potter, W. James. On Media Violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.