My 160 Memorable Games
Fischer,Robert James
Oklahoma City


1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 ¤f6 5.0-0
¤xe4 6.d4 b5 7.¥b3 d5 8.dxe5 ¥e6 9.c3 ¥c5
10.¤bd2 0-0 11.¥c2 ¤xf2 12.¦xf2 ¥xf2+
13.¢xf2 f6 14.exf6 £xf6 15.¢g1 ¦ae8 16.¤f1
¤e5 17.¤e3 ¤xf3+ 18.£xf3 £xf3 19.gxf3 ¦xf3
20.¥d1 ¦f7
Fischer,Robert James
US Open


1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6
5.¤c3 a6 6.¥e2 e5 7.¤f3 ¥e7 8.0-0 0-0 9.h3
¤bd7 10.¦e1 b5 11.a4 Provoking an advance he
isn't ready to meet. b4 12.¤d5 ¤xd5 13.£xd5
£c7 14.£b3 White can't take the rook because of
14.. .Nb6, but the queen is still misplaced and
exposed on b3. It was best to retreat to d1 and
s u f f e r q u i e t l y . ¤c5
Now White loses by force. Black would have a
huge edge after 16 Qc3 d4 17 Qd2 Nxe4, but no
immediate win. e4 17.¤d2 ¤d3 18.£xe4 ¤xe1
19.d6 ¥xd6 20.£xa8 ¥b7 21.£xf8+ ¢xf8
22.¢f1 ¤xc2 23.¦b1 ¤d4 24.¥d3 ¥b4
Fischer,Robert James
US Open


1.¤f3 ¤f6 2.g3 d5 3.¥g2 ¥f5 4.0-0 e6 5.d3
c6 6.¤bd2 ¤a6 7.a3 White deci des to play on
the queenside rather than the normal 7 Qe1, 8 e4
and kingside play. ¤c5 8.c4 b5 Creating a
weakness on c6, which White exploits immediately.
9.¤d4 £d7 10.¤xf5 exf5 11.¤b3 h6 12.¥e3
¤e6 13.¤d4
Once again White attacks both c6
and f5. Now Black should play 13...Nxd4 14 Bxd4
Be7 and try to defend b5 and d5. g6 Trading the
weak pawn on f5 for an entire weak diagonal
a1-h8. 14.£b3 ¦b8 This loses, but he had to drop
something. His best chance was 14...Bg7. 15.¤xc6
£xc6 16.cxd5 ¤c5 Black must have counted on
this, but White has another double attack coming.
17.£c3 £d6 18.¥xc5 £xc5 19.£xf6

Byrne,Robert E
Fischer,Robert James


24: Security of the King
1.¤f3 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 3.¤c3 ¥g7 4.d4 0-0 5.¥f4
d5 6.£b3 dxc4 7.£xc4 c6 8.e4 ¤bd7
commonsense development 9.¦d1 ¤b6 10.£c5
¥g4 11.¥g5 [ 11.¥e2 ¤fd7 12.£a3 ¥xf3 13.¥xf3
e5 14.dxe5 £e8 Black would have attained a
good game ] 11...¤a4!! This is a World Champion
type move (never miss a tactical opportunity
B r a d l e y ! ! ) 12.£a3 [ 12.¤xa4 ¤xe4 13.£xe7
( 13.£c1 £a5+ 14.¤c3 ¥xf3 15.gxf3 ¤xg5
removing the guard) 13...£xe7 14.¥xe7 ¦fe8 ]
12...¤xc3 13.bxc3 ¤xe4 14.¥xe7 £b6 15.¥c4
[ 15.¥xf8 ¥xf8 16.£b3 ¤xc3!© Pinning tactic]
15...¤xc3! 16.¥c5 [ 16.£xc3 ¦fe8 all these pins
based on the central King] 16...¦fe8+ 17.¢f1
¥e6!! Once in a lifetime move ... The uncommonly
b e a u t i f u l p o i n t o f t h e c o m b i n a t i o n 18.¥xb6
[ 18.£xc3 £xc5! pins 19.dxc5 ¥xc3 ; 18.¥xe6
smothered mate ... again based on the exposed
King £b5+ 19.¢g1 ¤e2+ 20.¢f1 ¤g3+ 21.¢g1
£f1+ 22.¦xf1 ¤e2# ] 18...¥xc4+ 19.¢g1 ¤e2+
20.¢f1 ¤xd4+ free pawn 21.¢g1 ¤e2+ 22.¢f1
¤c3+ 23.¢g1 axb6 24.£b4 ¦a4 25.£xb6 ¤xd1
The issue of the game is settled. For the Queen
Black has two Bishops and a Rook, not to mention
the White pawns which are going to fall like
ripeapples 26.h3 ¦xa2 27.¢h2 ¤xf2 28.¦e1
¦xe1 29.£d8+ ¥f8 30.¤xe1 ¥d5 31.¤f3 ¤e4
32.£b8 b5 33.h4 h5 34.¤e5 ¢g7 35.¢g1
¥c5+ 36.¢f1 ¤g3+ 37.¢e1 ¥b4+ [ 37...¦e2+
Loh 38.¢d1 ¥b3+ 39.¢c1 ¥e3+ 40.¢b1 ¥a2+
41.¢a1 ¥d4# ] 38.¢d1 ¥b3+ 39.¢c1 ¤e2+
40.¢b1 ¤c3+ 41.¢c1 ¦c2#
Fischer,Robert James
Manhattan CC Ch5657, sf, section 2


Estratégia - Carlos Alejandro Martinez - Aula 05
Variante 04 Luta do B bom contra o B mau
Posições diversas # 11 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.d4
cxd4 4.¤xd4 d5 5.¥b5 dxe4 6.¤xc6 £xd1+
7.¢xd1 a6 8.¥a4 ¥d7 9.¤c3 ¥xc6 10.¥xc6+
bxc6 11.¤xe4 e6 12.¢e2 ¦d8 13.¥e3 ¤f6
14.¤xf6+ gxf6 15.¦hd1² ¥e7 16.c4 e5 17.g4
h5! 18.h3 hxg4 19.hxg4 ¦h4 20.¢f3 [ 20.¦xd8+
¥xd8 21.¦g1 f5 22.gxf5 ¦xc4= ] 20...¥d6
21.b3?! [Era superior 21.¥b6! ¦d7 22.¢g3 ¦h8

My 160 Memorable Games
23.c5 ¥b8 e depois de 24.¢f3 as brancas teríam
um final com probabilidades de vitória.] 21...¢e7
[E r a i n t e r e s s a n t e 22.¦h1!?
23.¦xh1 ¦g8! 24.¦h6 ¢e6² com posição algo
melhor para as brancas.] 22...¥c7? [ 22...¦g8!
23.¦ad1 ¥b8 24.¦d7+ ¢e6= ] 23.¦xd8 ¥xd8
24.b4 [E r a m e l h o r 24.¦d1 ¥c7 25.¢g3 ¦h8
26.f4! ¥d6 27.f5 com vantagem para as brancas.]
24...¢e6= Com equilibrio. 25.a4 f5 26.gxf5+
¢xf5 27.b5 '#' axb5 28.cxb5 cxb5 29.a5?!
[ 29.axb5! ¦b4 30.¦a8 e4+! 31.¢g2! ( 31.¢e2?
¦b2+ 32.¢d1 ¥g5 33.¦a7 f6³ ) 31...¥g5 32.¥xg5
¢xg5 33.¦b8 ¢f4 as negras ficam algo melhor.]
29...¥g5 [ 29...¥f6! 30.¢e2 ¥g5 31.¥xg5 ¢xg5
32.a6 ¦h8 33.a7 ¦a8 34.¢d3 ¢f4 35.¢c3 e4
36.¢b4 ¢f3 37.¦a2 f5= ] 30.¥b6 ¥f4 31.a6 e4+
32.¢e2 ¦h8 33.a7 ¦a8 34.¦a5 ¢e6 35.¦xb5
¥d6 36.¢e3 ¥e5+- Tablas. [Embora com 36...f5
37.¢d4 ¥f4 38.¢c4+- ¥d6 39.¦b1 ¦c8+
40.¢b5 f4 41.¢a6 ¦f8 42.¢b7+- as brancas
poderíam alcançar a vitoria.; 36...¥e5? 37.¢xe4
f5+ 38.¢e3 ¦c8 39.¦a5 ¦a8 40.¢d3 ¥h2
41.¢c4 ¥d6 42.¢b5+- ]
Fischer,Robert James
Sicilian Defense, 33 moves. The 14 year old Bobby
Fischer capitalizes on a few inaccuracies and
builds up a strong attack. Sherwin finds several
ingenious moves but fails to avert defeat against
Fischer's exact play. Fischer was world champion
f r o m 1 9 7 2 - 1 9 7 5 . 1.e4
Fischer almost always
began with this move. c5
The Sicilian Defense.
2.¤f3 Developing. e6 3.d3 More usual is 3. d4.
White's move leads to a closed game called the
King's Indian Reversed. ¤c6 A good developing
move. 4.g3 To place the bishop on g2 where it will
reinforce the pawn on e4 and put pressure on d5.
¤f6 5.¥g2 ¥e7 6.0-0 0-0 7.¤bd2 This is better
than Nc3 which would prevent White from moving a
p a w n t o c 3 . ¦b8 This allows the b pawn to move
forward without fear that White's bishop on g2 will
threaten the rook. Black is planning a queenside
counterattack to White's coming kingside attack.
8.¦e1 Placing the rook in the center and leaving f1
available for the knight which often, from there,
goes to e3 or even to g4 via h2. d6 This is more
passive than the more usual d5. 9.c3 Preparing to
play d4. b6 9... b5 would have given Black better
chances. 10.d4 White now has a strong positon in
t h e c e n t e r . £c7? In a few moves White will have
threats based on playing Bf4 and attacking both the
queen and the rook. 11.e5! The center pawns are

on the move. Black's best is now 11. .. dxe5 12.
dxe5 Nd7 although Black's position would be
cramped and his pieces would be in each other's
way. ¤d5 12.exd6 ¥xd6 13.¤e4 If 13... Be7
then 14. c4 Nf6 15. Bf4. If 13... cxd4 then 14. Nxd6
Qxd6 15. c4 Nf6 16. Bf4. c4 This is the only move
to avoid the loss of material. However, it takes the
pressure off of White's center leaving him free to
conduct a kingside attack. Black has no prospects
for a counterattack in the center or for a queenside
attack. 14.¤xd6 £xd6 15.¤g5 Beginning the
kingside attack. Although it weakens his kingside, it
turns out that Black should have played 15... h6
here. ¤ce7 Bringing the knight to the defense of
the kingside. 16.£c2 Threatening Qxh7#. ¤g6
Threatening h5 and the knight can't move
because of the mate threat. ¤f6
A stunning surprise. If 18... Kxh7 then 19. Bf4
winning the rook on b8. ¤xh7 19.h5 To drive
a w a y t h e k n i g h t a n d t h e n p l a y B f 4 . ¤h4!
Black finds an ingenious way to counterattack.
20.¥f4 £d8 If now 21. Bxb8? then 21... Nxg2 22.
Kxg2 Bb7+ 23. Kg1 Qxb8 and Black would have a
bishop and knight for a rook and would be in a
strong position. 21.gxh4
Helping in the
defense and tempting White to play 22. Bxb7 so
that after 22... Bxb7 White would have no piece to
defend his white squares. Black's queen and
bishop would be very dangerous on the a8-h1
diagonal. 22.h6! Continuing e attack on the king.
The best defense is now 22... g6 but White would
still have a far superior position. £xh4? 23.hxg7
¢xg7 24.¦e4 Threatening 25. Be5+ winning the
queen. £h5 25.¦e3 Threatening 26. Rh3 Qg6 (Or
26... Qa5 27. Qxh7+) 27. Rg3 pinning and winning
the queen. f5 Blocking the White queen's attack on
h7. 26.¦h3 £e8 27.¥e5+ If 25... Kg8 26. Rg3+
Kf7 27. Rg7#. 25... Kg6 loses to 26. Qd2. ¤f6
Threatening 29. Qh6+ Kg8 30. Qh8+ Kf7
31. Qxf6+ Kg8 32. Rh8#. ¢f7 29.£g5 If 29... Ke7
then 30. Rh7+ Rf7 31. Qxf6+ £e7 30.¥xf6 £xf6
31.¦h7+ ¢e8 32.£xf6 If 32... Rxf6 then 33. Bxb7
Bxb7 34. Rxb7 and White is a rook ahead. ¦xh7
33.¥c6+ and Black resigned. His position is clearly
hopeless. If 33... Bd7 then 34. Qxe6+
Fischer,Robert James


1.e4 c5 The interesting point of this game is the
ending, so you might want to advance to move 37.
2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6 6.f4
e5 7.¤f3 £c7 8.¥d3 ¤bd7 9.0-0 b5 10.£e1

46.a3 e5 14.g6 17. the king should play an active role.¦c7 a5 26.¥a4 b5 5.c5 ¢xc5 48.1958 Sicilian.¥e3 ¥e7 10. 39. White is in a passive position. ¢e5 In any endgame..¢e2 ¥d8 28.¥f5 The White forces are better coordinated. ¥d7 40.£xd4 17.d6 9.¥a7 ¥b4 42.¥e3 g5 12.¦fd1 £c8 17.¤fxd5 winning material.¢f3 ¦h3+ 37.¥d6 £xc3 20.¢f3 ¥h5+ 45.¢f4 ¦a8 32..¦a7+ ¦c7 24.g3 ¢e7 44. but the game is lost.c3 White prevents the Black king from reaching d4.¤f3 ¤c6 3..¤c3 ¥g7 7.£g3 ¤e5 16.¥h4 c5 8.¦a8 bxc4+ 35.Samuel Herman US Championship 12.¦g8 ¥f6 32.bxc3 bxc3 20.¤c3 d5 4.£a5!= would have been much better.¥g5 ¥b4 6.exd4 0-0 11.£h7+ ¢f8 18.¥xf8 ¦xf8 22..a Russian chess magazine had recently given the following moves.] 8.] ] 1-0 C70 Fischer.. 16.¥b5 a6 4.axb5 axb5 23.c3 £c4 19.¥xd6+ ¥xd6 47.¤f3 ¤c6 3. ¢d4 43.¦xb7 ¦xb7 27.¦b1 ¥d4 24.d4 ¤f6 2. since Bf3 follows and the remaining pawn falls.¥e3 ¤f6 6. since the pawns are safe.£xd5 ¦c8 18.¦f8 ¢c6 33.¥xa7 ¥d8 38.a3! The Bishop has done his duty on the diagonal and can now be spared ¤xc2 19.¥xf4 0-0 15.¢f2 ¦bb7 26..Robert James New York New York m Rd: 1 B88 Fischer.£d3 ¦fd8 [ 15.¤d5 ¤xd5 16.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.g5+ hxg5+ 34.¥c2 ¥e7 13.¥c4 0-0 [ 7.¥xd4² ¥e6 11.¢b2 ¢f8 27.f3 A) 9. 16..¥e3 ¥c6 15.¥c5 ¤xf5 18.¥c4 e6 7.¦a8 h5 30.¤f4 £b6 14.¤f5 ¥xf5 15.-17.f5 ¤xd4 12.¢g3 ¥e2 47.g8£+ ¢xg8 49. 44.My 160 Memorable Games 3 ¥b7 11.¦a7 ¦xa7 37.£xe6+ ] 16.£d2 £a5 12.¤ge2 cxd4 10.¢f3 ¢f6 31.¦fa1 ¦b8 25.Radolfo Tan New York m4 1957 Estratégia .¥d5 The bishop now protects t h e p a w n f r o m a m o r e a c t i v e p o s i t i o n .¤h4 ¤e7 10.0-0 ¥d7 8.0-0 ¥e6 12.¤xd4 10.e4 c5 2..¥xc3 ¦xc3 21. Accelerated Fianchetto.¤f3 d6 3.c4 e6 3. known to Fischer.Robert James Walker.£f3 ¥g7 13.ganhando.¤d5 ¤xd5 18.¥xf6 ¥xf6 15.£xg6+ ¥g7 18.¥b3 ¤c6 9.¢xd6 fxe4 50.g6 technique sacrifice 16.axb3 d6 8.¤d5 ¢g7 20.¦f2 ¤h5 19.¥b3 ¤a5 6.¥xg7 ¤c3+ 19.¢f2 ¥d1 The idea is that the White king is cut off from the other forces.¥xd6+ As negras abandonam.axb5 axb5 26.¦g2 g5+ 36.¢c6 g6 45.¥xd5 ¥xd5 17..¦e3 ¦ac8 22.¤xd5 1-0 B35 Fischer..¦ae1 ¤b4 [ 16.cxd5 exd5 5.¦xe6+f o r k t a c t i c s. ¢e3 Here White resigned.a4 ¢d7 22. 42.¤cxd5! tactically opening a file ¦xd5 20.a4 ¥c8 25.Robert James Reshevsky.¢xc4 ¦c7 36.¥e6 ¢d4 49.¤xd4 g6 5.g4 1-0 1957 The b1-h7 Diagonal 1.¥xd4 b5 13. Modern Variation with Bc4 1. and. 41.£xc6+ ¦xc6 21.bxc3 ¤xg3 21.g4 exf4 14.¥b3 ¤a5? A well-known mistake .dxe5 dxe5 14..¦c3 ¦e1 .¤c3 a6 6.e3 h6 7.¦c5 ¢g7 30.b6+.¢d3 h6 29.h4 b5 14.0-0 ¤xb3 7.¦xg5 ¦h8 35.¥d3 ¤c6 9.¢b1 ¦fc8 15.¦xc3 £xc3 23..¢d5 ¥a5 41.¥c4 f6 On the dark squares the pawns are immune to attack from the enemy bishop.¢g2 ¥xf2 28.e4 e5 2. Now the c-pawn is doomed.£h4 ¥g7 13.g4 h6 33.Robert James Cardoso.¢g4 ¥g6 The White king cannot get across the central line.d4 cxd4 4.£b7 £c6 20..exf5 0-0 16. ¥e8 The bishop circles to a new post from which it can attack the pawn.fxg6 f5 46.Carlos Alejandro Martinez .¦g3 ¦xg3+ 38.£xc3 ¦xc3 24.a3 g6 12.¦xb5 ¥xg4 27.¥b8 ¥c5 43.a6 13.¤xe5 dxe5 17.Robert San Francisco ch-jr 1957 1.hxg3 ¥xc3 23. all this does is w e a k e n d 4 .c4 ¦d7 34.¦c1 ¦e3 25.cxb3 b4 17.d4 cxd4 4.¥e3 f6 39. but not to Reshevsky! [ 8.¥xe5 £c5+ 18.Aula 05 Variante 04 Luta do B bom contra o B mau Posições diversas # 10 1.¤c3 ¥e6 11.c4 White hopes this pawn will just march down the board.f4 £c7 11. Here it infiltrates on the dark squares.£h7+ ¢f8 18.b5+ ¢d7 40.. hemmed in by the pawns a t c 2 a n d e 4 .e4 c5 2.£h7+ ¢f8 18.¢xf2 ¥e6 29.¤xg6 fxg6 17.¥xf8 ¥xf8 19.Max (Machgielis) Fischer..¦he1 ¥xb3 16.d4 f6 9. [Se 46.g7 ¢f7 48. In fact.¦xe6 removing the guard] 17.0-0-0 b5 ( 12.¢xg3 We have reached a pure bishop endgame where Black has a good bishop and White has a bad bishop.. 0-1 D35 Euwe.b4 ¥e7 31.

£a8 And Black finally gave up.¢e3 ¤c6 41.£h4 ¦e6 24.fxe5 ¦xf2 19.¢f8 31.¦d2 ¤c7 34.¤xf7 ¤xf7 53.£g3 e5 23.¦xf3 exf3 86.¥xe5 14.¦h6 ¦f2 37.B/Zuerich 1959/MCL/[Bulletin] (41).¦ad1 ¥e8 19.a3 ¤d5+ 49.¤f2 bxc3 51.¤c3 ¦f2 40..¦xd5+.£d5+ ¢f5 13.¦e4 ) 26.¥g5 ¥xe5 14.¥xf6 ( 21.¦b6 d4 36.f4 b6 17.¦b8 ¢a4 67.hxg6 fxg6 30.¦c1 ¦a6 58.¤e4 ¦f4 26.¤d5 ¥xd5 15.¦xd6 ¥f5 30.¤d6 ¥xd6 29.K-Baklanova.£xc4 ¢g7 18.g4 ¤xb3 11.¦e3 ¤d4 72..e5 d5 20.L/Sochi 1958/EXT 99 (11) dxe6 [ 11.a3 ¢f6 32.P/Belgrade 1988/CBM 10 (15) ) 15.¦c3 ¦e1 31.c3 e5 21..¤c5 ¦f6 25.H-Mandel.g6 ¤e5 55.¢h5 15..¦b1 ¦f7 40.¦h1 ¤b4 44.axb5 ¤d8 36.£xa6 ¤d8 39.¦g1 ¥f7 60.¦c2 ¤f3 65.¦xg6 ¦xg6 32.¥xe7+ ¢xe7 39.axb4 ¢e6 34...¢b2 ¦e8 41.¤d5 ¤f5 18.£g4 ¥f7 21.¦b1 ¥c8 28.f4 ¦g8 35.W/ Kiel 1965/EXT 2004 (10) ¢xf7 The 15-year-old Fischer has found the fatal flaw in Reshevsky's position.£h2 ¦da8 76.¢c3 ¢d7 59.¦b2+ ¢a5 66.£a4 a6 44.¥h6 e6 17..¥xg7 ¢xg7 17.exd5+ ¢xd5 38.¤a5 ¥d5 81.¦c8+ ¢g7 30.h5 g5 22.¦f6 b5 38..¦h7+ ¥f7 46.¤e4 ¥f7 49.G-Fuderer.£g4 ¤f5 73.f4 ¢e6 33.£c5 axb4 53.h7+ ¢f8 64.¦b3 ¦c5 24.gxh5 ¤xh5 15.¢c2 ¦a7 ( 25. ¤c6 [ 12.¤e4 ¥c7 19.¥c6? ¤xd5 22.¢d4 ¤f3+ 60.£e3 ¦c6 57. Bd8) 27..¦a8+ ¢b3 68.£xg6+ ¢d7 88. B) 9.£d1 ¦gg8 36.¥d5 e4 39.¦xe7 ¢xe7 ( 29.....£g1 b5 46.axb3 a6 12.¦c5+ ¢b6 64.£c2 ¦g6 43.¤xg5+ ¢g8 48.¦d2 ¦g6 40.0-0 [ 14.¦fe1 ¦f5 20.¦h8+ ¢e7 45. .exd5 £b5 16.¦a6 f5 37..fxg7 ¢xg7 12.g5 a5 52.£f2 ¤xb2 18.£xa1± ] 10.£xe7+ ¢g8 15..¥e7 ¦c6 25.¦d3 f2 89.¤xc3 ¤c4 31.¦a6? 29.£d1 ¦gg8 45.£e2 ¥d7 15.b5 ¦e2+ 35.¢xf2 ¤f7 20..L/Oberhausen 1961/EU-chT (41) ) 13.¢d2 ¦f1 49.£xd8+T h e r e s t i s c h i l d ' s p l a y ..¦d1 ¤d4 65..¦g5 ¦h8 24.£xe7+ ¦f7 27.¦ad1 ¤d8 22.e5 /\ 27.£c3 ¦f8 55.£e3 ¦cg8 33.£e3 ¦g6 47.¤c5 ¦f6 20.¤xg5 ¤xe5 52.¤c7 ¦b8 19..¦g1+ ¢h4 ( 14..¦c1 ¥e8 42.£c3 ¥d5 26.¦xe2 a4 19.b6 ¥e4 35.¤e6 1-0 Bastrikov.b6 ¢c6 41.¥c5 ¤d4 27.¥xd4 ¤xd4 30.£h4 ¢e8 68.¤xb3 10.¢d5 ¢c7 62.b7 ¦b8 31.£c7 ¤c8 39.¦c4 ¤d8 40.¢b4 f5 40.£c6+ ¢d8 91. 1-0 .¢d2 ¤f4 50.£xf8+ ¢xf8 31.. .b6 ¤d6 38.b7 ¦ef6 40.¥f6 ¤a5 26..M-Larsen.A/ Zagreb 1964/EXT 2001 (69)] 13.¤f4 ¢f8 22.¦xa3 e3 40.b6 ¦e7 ( 28.¦f2 e4 84.¤de2 ¦a6 19.¦h1 ¥h8 50. [ 10.T/Warsaw 2001/CBM 82 ext (91)] 14.h3 ¦fxb7 41.b5 axb5 35.G-Shamkovich.£a3 ¤c6 28.¤c5 ¦d6 66.¦e8# ) 31.¦c1 ¦e3 29.¦b1 ¢d6 35.25.c3 ¥e8 42.My 160 Memorable Games 4 28.¤c3 ¦fa8 61.h6 ¦g8 23.g4 ¤d6 20.¢xe6? 12.¤e4 h6 34.¢d8?? 31.£c1 ¥c4 39.¤d1 ¦e2 39. R b 6.£f1 ¦f6 82.f3 ¦g6 25.hxg5 hxg5 47.a4 1-0 Kuprejanov.h4 a5 46.h3 ¢d7 43.c4± bxc3?+.¦e1 ¥d7 32.¦xc6 bxc6 37.¤d4 ¢e7 45.¦e4 ¢f8 37.¦dd1 a6 33.£g2 ¤f5 77..G-Scharrer.¤a5 10.£d1 ¦gg8 42.¥xg7 ¦xc6 ) 21.¦h5 ¥e6 24. 28.b7 ¦b8 32.¥f4 ¤c4 16.¦e1 ¥c6 36..¦d7 ¦c8 22.¢xc2 d5 37.¦e2 g5 33.M-Portisch.¥b5 ¦a5 21.0-0-0 ¤d6 15.g6 hxg6 63.¤d5 ¤e8 21.¤b7 ¦da6 80.£c5 ¦e8 28.¦b8 / \ 2 7 ..£g2 1-0 Palac.¦xg6 ¦a8 33.¦ab1 ¤c4 22.¦xd5 ¦xa7 31.¦d5 ¤f7 33.¤e2 ¦xc2 29.¦b7 ¤xg6 56.¥xg7 ¢xg7 18.¤d2 ¤a5 35.¢b1 ¤b5 32.¤f3 ¤e7 38.¦d2 ¤d4 78.¢c1 ¦g2 36.¥b7!+.¤d6 15.b4 ¦ef8 32.¦c3 ¤e2 71.£e2 ¦c8 35.¦xa5 ¤d2 63.¦c3 ¦d8 74.¢c5 e5 61.£d1+ ¦f3 17.¤e4 ¤e6 24.£c5 ¤ed6 16.¦a8 ¢c7 38.¤c3 ¤d6 26.£e2 £xe2™ 18.h4 h5 14.£g2 ¦f8 90.¦d7 ¤f7 37.b4 ¦ff8 31..£d2 ¥d7 13.¦xc6 29.exf6 ¤xa1 11.¢xd4 1-0 Tal.¤e4 ¦da6 69.¦c5 a6 34.¥c4 ¦fc8 20. .cxb4 ¤d4 54.¦f2 ¥d5 56..G/ Reykjavik 1957/EXT 99 (51)] 9.¦d3 ¥c4 70.c3 ¢g7 31.¦he1 ¦c8 23.¦h7+ ¥f7 48.e5!± ¤e8? Breaking communications between the Queen and Rook..¦xb7+ ¦xb7 42.¦dd1 1-0 Homuth.) 29.¤c4 13.¤xh5 ¦xh5 23.0-0-0 a5 16.¢c4 1-0 Tal.¢c5 e4 69.£e3 ¦xf3 85.fxe5 dxe5 34.£d1 ¤xe5 14.¦xf7 11.¦c2 ¦xc2+ 36.£e2 ¥f6 16.¥d4 ¤c6 16.b7 ¦ab8 38.¦g7 ¢f8 47.b5 exd5 28.¤e6 ] 11.£e2 ¥xf4 17.M-Ostojic.¦he1 a5 17.g4+ '1-0 Valenti.¤c5 ¦d6 79.g5 ¢f8 54.¦a6 ¤e5 58..¦d3 ¤a6 37.E-Palmason. .bxc3 a4 1/2-1/2 Mednis.0-0 ¤c7 18.¦a3 ¥b7 27.a3 ¥c4 59.¦dg1 ¦h8 21..¤d1 ¦e2 41.b4 axb4 33.¦e1+ ¥e5 ( 30.b3 ¢f8 24.¦xd6+.b7 ¦b8 32.¢e2 ¦xf4 50.bxa7 ¦a6 30.fxe4 ¦f6 30.£g1 ¤d4 75.¦g3 ¦e1 48.£f4 ¢e8 25.¦b8 26.¤d7 ¦c6 23.f3 ¢f8 27.b5 ¤d8 32.h5 £b6 26.¦xb6 ¢e7 57.¤e4 ¤b3 62.P/Arco 2000/EXT 2001 (13)' ¢xg4 14.¥xe7 30.£e4 ¦d8 87. [ 9.£f2 ¤6b5 28..¢b1 b4 14.¤e4 b6 29.c3 ¦c8 31. 26..¢b1 £b4 27.¦c3 ¦xc3 30.¦d7 ¥xe4 29.W-Kurzynsky.¦hg1 ¦h6 29.¦e8++.¦f6+ ¢e7 34.b4 e6 ( ¹26.h4 e5 17.¥g5+ ¢h5 16..¥f6 ¥a6 21.£d2 [ 13.£c1 ¥e6 83.¥c6 a3 23.¥xf7+!! 1-0 Humburg.£e4 ¥d5 67.¦hd1 ¤c6 51.¤f3 ¤g6 51.) 30.¤b7# 1-0 Toma.¦xb7 ¤f4 25...b4 ¤b8 38.£xf3# ] 12...¢d3 g5 41.¦h6 b4 43.M/Germany 1999/EXT 2003 (40)] 13..¢b3 e5 39.¥xf6 22.g4 ¤c6 36. 30.¦h7+ ¢f8 44.£f6 £f8 28.a4 ¦e6 34.

) 16.£g6+ ¦g7 17..gxh5 ¢h8 25..h6 ¥f6 26.] 10.d4 cxd4 4. a favor das brancas...¤xc6 bxc6 9.¤xd5 15. Se 17.¥xg7 ( 16.MLarsen.cxb4 £xb4+! 19.¦fc8 19.¥xa7 ] 17. e verifiquei que a proporção era de nove vitórias em dez. . tanto que havia estabelecido uma "regra científica": abria a coluna h..¤xe6 fxe6 12.V/URS-ch/ 1953/ com nítida superioridade.¥xb3 13.¦d1 ¦f7 29. [ 16.fxg4 ¤f6 22. sacrificando primeiro um peão e depois a qualidade..¥d7? 8. Certa vez.h5! Não há necessidade de perder tempo com o antiquado g4.¥b3! Ele não teria outra chance com o bispo! Senti que a partida estava ganha.d5..h5 18. folheei vários números do "Shakhmatny Bulletin". Larsen esclareceu que estava jogando para vencer e. como prenúncio do inevitável desfecho.£xh6+ ¢g8 16. Os comentários são tão instrutivos e lúcidos quanto o texto.f4 ¥e7 8.¥g5 e6 7... a4.fxg4 ¤xe4 ( 20.¤c3 a6 6..¥xd5 [ Mais forte seria 15.¥b5 ¦h7!N 14.¤f3 d6 3..A-Kortschnoj.exd5 £xd5 17.bxc3 ¦fc8= torna inútil o peão a mais das brancas) 17. caso as pretas p r e t e n d a m a v a n ç a r s e u P a 7 .d4 cxd4 4..¦f4 £g5 27. pam! . variante na qual as brancas abandonam o ataque e buscam pressionar na coluna "e"] 15.¦hf1 ] 11.] 7.. É verdade que as brancas estariam perdidas em um final de rei e peões.¥xd4 22.¦ab8! 18.Svetozar Fischer. já que seu contra-ataque jamais consegue ser desencadeado.¥b2 ¦fb8= ] 16.¥xc6+ ¥d7 10.¥e3 ¥g7 [ 6.0-0-0 ¤f8 13.0-0-0 A idéia é evitar .. ¦fc8 [Com 18....¤f3 d6 3. [ Digna de menção é a tentativa de Donald Byrne: 9.conduziria ao mate ) 21.£h6+.. e pam! . Este é um dos jogos-chave que contribuíram para minar a reputação desta variante...exd5! £b5 16.£xb4 ¦xb4+ 20.h6+..£d2 ¤c6 9.¥d4! ¥xc6 11.fxg4 ¤xe4 22.¥xg7 ¢xg7 16. se eu não a jogasse fora.£xe4 ¥g7 23. Laszlo S a p i a n d A t t i l a S c h n e i d e r ] [ Este refinamento substitui o antigo 9..¤d5 [ Mais fraco seria 14.ganhando um peão. que constitui uma aula objetiva sobre como montar um ataque contra o rei em fianqueto. 6.£xg4+.¥xd7 ¤xd7 19.¦df1 ¥xg5+ 22.fxg5 ¤fd7 [ 10.g4! e se ¤e5 11..¥b5+ ¤c6 ( 7..¥b3 £a5 12.0-0-0 b5 [ Após 12.£e2!± 'Tal.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¥xc3 bxc3 18.¤e2? ¥xb3 15.] 9..cxb3!‚ as pretas não conseguem desenvolver nenhum ataque contra essa peculiar configuração de peões..a5 e .¤xg4 21.A-Kortschnoj.gxh5 e5 23.£xg4+.¥xd5 [Má opção seria 14..£e3 ½-½ B77 Fischer.£xe6+ ¢h8 18. por Bobby Fischer # 2 Aniquilando o dragão Defesa Siciliana...¥h6+.. seja a melhor defesa ativa à disposição das pretas.g5!+.¥e2 d5? 12. 20.¥e3 ¦d8 23..e4 c5 2. Ataque Iugoslavo Embora a Siciliana em geral.£xe4 exd4 24.. [ Após a partida.) 22. V/UY -ch/1953/' Suetin.cxb3 ¦fd8 ] 14.h4 £b5 Agora as pretas ameaçam revidar com .¤c3+ 17.¤xd5 16.£h6++. O ataque das brancas desenvolve-se quase espontaneamente..¥xg5 £xg5+ 23.. os deuses colocaram o meio jogo.£xc3 £xc3 19..Bc4".£h5+ ¢f8 13.¥h4 g5 10."] 13. Até jogadores fracos derrotam Grandes Mestres que usam essa variante.¥e2 ¤g6 14. até recentemente.£b5? s e r i a r e f u t a d o c o m 17.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦xf7 £xf7 32. a abandonar a Variante Dragão..¦xh5+.¤d7? 8.My 160 Memorable Games 5 B98 Gligoric.£e3 ¤f6 ( 21.¤g4? perderia também para 7..0-0-0 ¤e5 brancas ganhariam.£d4 ¤g6 31..¦dg1 ¥xd4 22.¤xd4 O modo pelo qual as pretas pretendem a t i n g i r o e q u i l í b r i o n ã o e s t á c l a r o .£d2 ¥e6 25. Já havia vencido dúzias de jogos amistosos em posições análogas...£g6 ¦f7 15.g4! hxg4 ( 18..Bent Portoroz izt...¢b1 £e7 24.f3 0-0 8.¦g7!+.hxg4 21. rejeitou forçar o empate com 15...£f2 ¢g8 28.'+-' venceria) 19.] 18.bxc3 ( 17.£d5 ¥g4 21... quando o Ataque Iugoslavo estava em seus primórdios.b3 £e7 30..e4 c5 2.¤h7 11.h5! gxh5 21.Robert James Larsen.¥xd4 ¥e6 11. Larsen afasta-se da teoria no décimo quinto lance. Fischer abre a coluna "h". Como disse Tarrasch: "Antes do final. muito do valor já foi tirado da outrora prestigiada Variante do Dragão. [ Não há maneira satisfatória de impedir o ataque das brancas.M-Larsen..B ZPrich 1959' Tal.¦ac8? Lance decisivo da derrota.¤xh5 20.) 20...¥g3 hxg5 12..) 8.. Mecânica e rotineiramente.¦de1± ' uetin.¢b1 b4 14.] 15. Num louvável esforço para criar novas complicações.£f3 h6 9.£f4 e5 23.£xb4÷ mantendo vivo o jogo.gxh5 .¥xg7 ¢xg7 21.¥c4 [Ver também o livro "The Sicilian Dragon Yougoslav 9.¦he1 a5 17.¦dg1 hxg4 20. por isso. mate! ¦c7 Essa perda de tempo é infelizmente necessária. 1. o que se mostra desastroso.h5! gxh5 ( 19.. 7. As pretas conseguirão reforçar a variante? Só o tempo dirá.¦dg1 e5 22. mas as pretas normalmente levam o mate muito antes..¥xh8+. IV 1958 Minhas 60 Melhores Partidas.Robert James Portoroz Interzonal 1958 1.B Zürich 1959.¤c3 g6 Larsen era um dos renitentes e se recusava.g3 ¦d8 26.¦xg4+ hxg4 23.a5!? A resposta mais enérgica seria 10.exd5 ¥d7 17. Variante do Dragão.

e3 b6 8...£d3+. T h e m o v e s u r p r i s e d F i s c h e r .¦fd1 ¦ad8 16. Qe5) com o que as pretas d e f e n d e m t u d o ..¥f3 bxc6 23..e4 £e6 23.) 23.c6 £g5 22.e4 d6 5..¤c3 ¤f6 5..¥g7 33.¥xe6! fxe6 (Se 25. ¢e7 ( 31.¤xb5 ¦f7 [An attack starts 27.£xf8+ ] 30. 31..£h2+.¦c1 ¤f6 16.c5 ¥d7 17.¦xf4 35. 25.venceria.fxe4 ¤f4 21.g6 £e5 ( 24..a4 26..£d6# ) 32.¦xd5 ¥f6 19. 21.£c2 ¤h5 18.¦g1 e6 28.¥e3! ] 18..¦e1 ¥e5 27..¦f3 ¥e5? 30.¥g5 h6 9.¢xg7? 23.c4 ¥e7 4..My 160 Memorable Games 6 19.¥xc8 ¦xc8 30.¥e3 axb5 26.£xc2! e5 25. gxh5 [ 22.¦xe8# .hxg6 hxg6 20....d4 d5 2.£xd4 gxh5 24.£c4 g5 29.¥xd4 23.¤xc7! ] 35.¥g5 £b7 [ Ou 28.dxc7+.£xh5+ £h7 36.¤d4! £h4 36..£h6 e6!= '=!' (ameaçando .g5 ¤h5 [ Vasiukov.£xd6 ) 25.£d7+ 1-0 .£d7 29.£a4 ¦a8 26.. 21.g3! Tal counterattacks b r i l l i a n t l y .b4 ¤g5 13.£h2 ¤h5 25.a5 As pretas.hxg3 £c7 15.¤xf4 ¢h7 40.fxg7! bxc2+ 24.e ganha ] 22. Sometimes incredible fireworks set the board on fire..¦h6! e6 (Se 23..] 20...gxf4 ¥xf4 [ 34.¦g5+.¥d3 ¥b7 9. .. Tal reacts quietly.ganha ) 26.E sugere 21.¥xg7 ¤xg7 ( 22.£e8+ ¦f8 34...a4? 22.bxc4 £c6 22.¥g3 ¤xg3 14.¥xc4 ¤e4 13.¦cd1 ¤e5 20..¤d2 £e8!? Fischer prepares an attack in a remarkable way.¦xd8+ ¦e8 29..d6! axb3 28.) 24.Robert James Candidates' tournament 1959 When Tal won the Soviet championship.¥xe6 ¢e7 29.] 29..Tigran Fischer.£g6+ ¢h8 35..'/\ f3-f4' /\ f3-f4 seria decisivo. The 'Magician of Riga' seemed to ridicule the laws of classical chess in his wild adventures.¥xf6+.¤f3 £d6 ½-½ E93 Tal.¥c5+ +.fxg4 ¤xe4 21. ] 28. 11.¥xe6+ ¢f8 32.c4 g6 3.¤f3 e5 7.¥xe6 ) 25.¦f7 30.£xf6 £xd7 34..¥xf4 exf4 27.0-0 ¤h7 12..¦xg6++.d4 ¤f6 2.£xg5 26.¥xf6? ¥xf6 21.gxf7+ ¢xf7 ( 24.dxc5 due to 19.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¦c1 c5 11...d5 exd5 17.. Riga 1958... 28.¦g5 ¦g7 30.¥xg7 ¢xg7 23.a4 24..£c4 ¦c8 29..£xh7# ] 19.¥f2 £e7 15. 1.¦g1+ ¢h7 33..d7 ¦d8? Um erro 31.¤c4 fxe4 20.¤h2 £d7 30.£h6+ forçaria mate em três lances.£e2 dxc4 12.¢g7 31. [ 25..¥h6‚ ).b5!? Tal stirs up the g a m e .¥xd5? ¦xc2! ] 26..¦xf7 25.exd5! [Não 26. .£d6+! As pretas a b a n d o n a m .¦xg6+! £xg6 27.¥e3 d5! Uma desesperada tentativa de libertação. as combinações são tão naturais quanto um sorriso de criança" .d6 ¦f6 [Com 27.¥h6+. and got in the candidates' tournament by winning Portoroz 1958...¦xf3 28.gxf7+ ¢f8 25. Mas por um fio a batalha foi p e r d i d a .f3 f5 14. his games had a sound positional basis.Mihail Nekhemye Fischer.d5 ¤bd7 8.£h2 ¤g5 22.Robert James Bled/Beograd ct 1959 1.fxe4 ¤f4 21.£h2+.¥g7 32.£h2 ¤h5 25.£xe5 dxe5 27.¦xh5+ ¢g8 31.£xe5+ £g7 37.¦xf4 ¦xf4 37.e6 24.¥xf6 ¥xf6 30.a4 ¦a8 32. ¦af8 34.gxf6 axb3 23.¥xc8+ameaçando Rg1) 26.£a6 £c7 28..£h5 ] 33.¦d5 ¦c5 24.¢h1 £g5? [ C o r r e c t i s 32.£c2 ¦xd5 24.gxf7+ ¢h7 ( 25.£g6+ ¢h8 29..¦xf7 [ Com 26.¦g1+ ¢h7 27.¦d7 as brancas podem recuperar a q u a l i d a d e c o m 28.ganhando material.ameaçando …29.£xg7# ) 33.¥g5 h6 6.. Two cycles took place in Bled. The candidates' match tournament was played in four cycles of seven rounds during the next year.¦d8 26.h3! £g5 31. ] 27.¥h6‚ .¦xg6+ ¤g7 27.bxa6 b6 20.£e6 ¦b8 32.dxc6 ¥g4 24.£d4+ ¦8f6 39..a4 27.cxd6 cxd6 19..0-0 ¤bd7 10.£d8+! ¦xd8 28..¦xh5! Fine comentou: "Em posições assim.¥e2 0-0 6.¥xg7 ¢xg7 26.¥e7+! ) 30. [ Equality keeps 18..e6 25.¤e8 como possível defesa 22.g4! hxg4 20..g4 [ Evitando o sôfrego 20.£d6+! ¢g7 32.g6 e5 [ 23.£h7+ ¢f8 ( 32.f3! (Tal).£g2 £e5 28.¤xc7! ¦b2 33. a star was born.£xg7# ] 1-0 D58 Petrosian. ] 24.£f7# . His attacking and speculative style won the hearts of chess fans worldwide.fxe4! [Tal rejects 18.¤f3 e6 3.. só precisam de mais um lance para desencadear seucontra-ataqu e.¤e6+ ¢h8 38..e5 dxe5 41. ] 23.¢f8 26. [ ¹31.cxd5 £d6 25. agora.b3 ¤xc4 21..£xd6+ ¦e7 27..d7+.] 26.¥e6+( ou tentar um pouco mais com 28.¤c4 ] 19..¦xg5+ ¦xg5 26..£xc5 30.£h6+ ¢g8 25.¦cf1? [ Both players miss the combination 30.¦f5+ ¢e7 33.¥h4 a6!? 10.¦h1+. He also played the endgame accurately.¤dxe4 ¤xe4 20. Actually... He qualified for the interzonal by winning the next championship.¦f7++.¥xg4 £xg4 25.£d5! £f7 (se 29.. Moscow 1957. The Casino was the playing hall and Toplice the hotel.£d6# ] 28.¥h4 0-0 7.ganharia.-. E com 27.¤xd5 ¥xd5 18.

h4 ¥c8 34.. o certo seria 7.¥e6 ¥c6 38.¤xe4 ¤xe4 11.¤b8 27..g3 ¦g7 39. porém.d4 cxd4 4. Rossetto não consegue encontrar a resposta mais adequada: 19..cxb5 axb5 17.¥xh7+ ¤xh7-+ ).¤xb6 ¥c6 18.0-0 d6 10.. 1. e Rossetto acertadamente abandona.¥b3 g5!= equilibraria a situação. Fischer lança-se a um final também pouco promissor. a partida Spielmann.¦h8 h6 30.¥e4 ¦fe8= ] 20.¦xd8 ¦xd8 18.¦c1 (ou então 9..¦c3 ¤d2 29.¦xa5+.] 23...¢h8 21.¥d5 h5 41.¥b3 seguido de Pc5.¦d3 ¦e7 28.¢d2 ¥b5 20.¥c6! ¤c5 (em 26.¤a4 ¤e5 20..c6 ¦c7 28.. nunca 9.¦xc3 ¥f7 25.¦e3 ¦d7+ 27.¥d5 ¥d7 35.devendo as brancas vencer.£a5 [ 15. obrigaria definitivamente as pretas a tomarem um espécie de formação de SCHEVENINGEN.£e1 £b8 15. Em continuação.c5 dxc5 27..a5 22..¥f5!± sustentaria a vantagem..] 24.¦ac1 [Com 15.¦xc5 a4= as pretas sustentariam o jogo) 24.. 15.¥xa4 ¤xe4= igual ] 15. ] 7.e4 c5 2.¥e2! ¤xc4? 10.g3 £h5 19..e5? dxe5 18.¥xd4 exd4 18..¤c3± e o peão de b5 seria fraco.¥a4 g5!= seguido de K g 7 .¢d4 ¥e8 32.c4 £c7 [Melhor seria 5.£b6 £xb6 [Duvidoso seria 16.dxe6! )] 21.e4 c5 2..¦d2 ¦fd8 21.axb4 ¦a8 24.Robert James Rossetto.¦xd6 ¥xa4 17..imobilizando o cavalo) 27.b4! ¥b7 13..¦e6 ¢d8 46..] 19.¤b6 23.¤xd4 ¤f6 5. ao longo da terceira linha.¥d3 '?' [ Posicionamento errado do bispo.¢c3 a6? [ 30.b4 'Manobrando para abrir a grande sortida em c5.] 26.¢c1 ¤d4 17.£xd4 ¦d8 14.¥e3 ¤bd7 11.¥c4+eliminaria o Pa6.a3 ¤xc3-+ etc.exd5 20. colocandose em situação difícil.¥d3 dxe4 10. (não 17. O velado e aparentemente insignificante ataque sobre o Pa6 é um meio de forçar as pretas a abandonarem a proteção da posição c5.] 6. Isso é "ZUGZWANG".0-0 ¤eg4! ) 9.exd5 ¤e5 21.e 7 .¤c6 8. (do livro More Chess Questions Aswered)) 8.f3 ¤d7 '!' 'As pretas esperavam.¤e5! 9..¦xd6 ¤g4 18.¥xd4 ¥c5 10. se ¤e5 9.Bxd7..¤e5! 20.¥e6+ ¢b8 50.Aula 05 Variante 04 Luta do B bom contra o B mau Posições diversas # 14 1.. Rosseto inconscientemente colabora.¦cd1 ¢f8= tudo igualmente se normalizaria.a5 25.¤c3 ¤f6 7.Robert James Bolbochan.¤xc6 bxc6 22.¤xd7 ¦xd7 20.' g6 [Com 21..¦f8 ¥d7 33.¥xd7 ¦xd7 25.¥a4 b6 [ Com 22.. Consegue..¦xa4 ¢e7 31..h4± ] 17.¦c1 b6 12.' ¤b8 '[]' 'Forçado!' [ 24.¥c6!?= seria sólido mas preso..¥xc4 £xc4 11.a3 (depois de 24..¦d6 1-0 B41 Fischer.S prosseguiu: 7.f5 22.£xd6 £xd6 16.¤d5 '!' 'Uma resposta inesperada que lança as pretas em injustificável confusão. apressando seu próprio fim..¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦xc5 ¢g7 .¦a3 '!' 'A ameaça é simplesmente 25.a3! e se ¤c6 ( prevenindo . i g u a l .Hector Mar del Plata 1959 Minhas 60 Melhores Partidas.ganharia. com esse lance.] 25.¦b6 '#' ¢c8 42. sair do perigo..¤e7+ (se 20.f5² tornando difícil o progresso das brancas..f 6 .d4 cxd4 4. embora a partida pareça igual.¢xd1 ¥d7 13.. #' [Mas com 19.a5 24.c3 dxc3+ 24.bxa5 bxa5 26.¤db5 ¥b4 7. as pretas deviam ter usado a jogada mais agressiva 8.b5 26.. também conveniente seria 19..¦d3 f5 '?' 'Alheio ao perigo! ' [ A melhor defesa seria 23.¤f3 e6 3.. Ou 19.. ' 19.¤b6 27.¤xc3 d5 9.a5 ¦e7 26.¥e2 ¤xc4 10.bxc5 dxc5 27.b4 0-0-0 16.0-0 ¥d7 12.¦b2+. depois do lance 19..¢f6 ¦h7 44.. qualquer vantagem explorável.¤f6 6.RTartakover.¦d6+ ¢c7 47.. realiza uma manobra insólita de torre.¥g8 ¦c7 49.Carlos Alejandro Martinez ..¥xe4 £xd1+ 12.¥xd5 [ Surpreendido.Nd5..a4 bxa4 30.. ..f3 ¦ac8 14.. A outra alternativa seria 24.¥e6+ ¢c7 43.¥c6+ganharia um peão.¥e4 b6= (não 21.dxc6 bxc6 22.¦e1 ¦he8 19.¥e3 f5 14.¦c1 ¢b8 23.¤c3 e6 6.. As pretas nunca deverão permitir Pc5 sem obrigar as brancas a conceder a troca do bispo pelo cavalo. trocar um bispo por um cavalo.0-0 d6 e se 13.¦fd1 0-0 15.¦f6 ¥e8 37.] 22.£e5 17.¥e3 ¤xd4 '?' [ Em vez de tentar simplificar.bxa5 bxa5 26.¥d5 ¢c8 45.¤a4 'Forçando uma série de trocas que dariam as brancas uma pequenina vantagem' ¥xd4 13. deixando-as desesperadamente inibidas.¤fg4! com vantagem.¥e7 8.f4 g6 36.exd5 e5 [ Mais seguro seria 20. Em situação idêntica.¥c2 d6 11.b5? 16.... qualquer movimento de Rossetto romperá o equilíbrio. por Bobby Fischer # 5 Obrigação ingrata Esta partida demonstra dramaticamente o significado da expressão alemã zugzwang.My 160 Memorable Games 7 B45 Fischer..¦d8+ ¢c7= 29.c5 '!' bxc5 [Com 25.¤e3 g5! ) 20.¤b3? ¤xe4! 14.¥e2 0-0 9. tanto no início como até à metade da partida.a4 ¥c4 22.¦b1! ¤xc4? 28. objetivando ganhar espaço para incursões no território adversário.¥e8 ] 31.b3 c5 23..¤f6 25.¦c1+. Impossibilitado de obter. Bb4. ou então 26.¢e5 ¥e8 40.¤xd4 a6 5. ] 16.¦xe8 ¦xe8 21..£f2± com uma ótima posição para as brancas.] 9.¥b3 ¦f7 27.¥e3 etc.¥b5! .¤c3 ¥b4= teoricamente igualando a posição das pretas..¤e5 21.a3 ¥xc3+ 8...a3 axb4 23.Jacobo Mar del Plata 1959 Estratégia .¦c1 £b4 12.¥f3 e5 15..¥xc4 £xc4 11.¦b6 ¢c8 48.¦a5! ¢f7 29.

portanto.a4 d5!= ] 12.] 15.¦xc8 ¤xc8 36.¤a4 c3!³ 18. num poderoso grupo de quinze.¦xb2 ¥xb2 .¥xb6! Pilnik apressa-se a c o r r i g i r s u a o m i s s ã o .¢h1 [ ¹23.S ch-USA 1962.c3 ¥f6 20.¥xd5 19.b4 14. # Zugzwang! As pretas ficaram sem possibilidade de movimentar satisfatoriamente os peões.¤b6 ¦xe7 15.fxe5 ¥xe5 [ 20.R Varna ol 1962' 10. proporciona boas férias e atrai os melhores enxadristas do mundo. Fischer empatou com Ivkov.¦xd5 ( 19.¤bd7 9.¦b3 ¦f7 29.¥e6+.¥xb6™ seria indispensável..¥b3 ¤e8 34.¦e8 respondido com 38.¦cc1 ¦xb8-+ > ganharia. reduzidas a movimentos de peões.. nada proporciona às brancas.¤a1 ¦ab8 17.¥b6 ( 16..¥xe5 21.¤xb8? £xf2 28.M Beograd ct 1959 Fischer....¤d5 ¤xd5 15.¥e7 ¦e8 13...exd5 ¤xd5 12.¦aa7+venceria... procurei consolidar um pouco mais a posição e conservar a opção de mover o N para a4 ou c4.¤c1 ¦ab8 17.£b6 26.T Leipzig ol 1960 com melhor jogo..a4!± ) 9.f4 ¥f6 [ 18.exd5 ¥d7 18. Fischer não comete sequer um engano...¤c3 a6 6..c8£++...S Habana 1962] 10..¦ac3ƒ manteria a pressão] 28.0-0 9.a4 h6 35.¥b3 ¢h8 30.G] 15.¦b8!µ ganhando pelo menos um peão..] 14.d4 cxd4 4.R-Bolbochan..£a3 ¥xa5 23. a saber:.d5 11. Smyslov..¥e3 ¥e6 10.b4 24.. conseqüentemente.¥xe7 ¤xc3 11.E Skopje 1967..R-Tal.£f2 a5³ >< c2 'com bom jogo contra o Pc2 branco. ele e Pilnik começaram a inventar complicações e o último dá um passo em falso.RG h i t e s c u .R Varna ol 1962..¦d2 [ 13. Então.¤b6 ¥d8-+ X c2 ) 16. que Fischer aproveita para obter um peão central passado.¦a2 ¦b2 30. outrora popular..¤xe5?³ Isso dá às pretas um forte Pe passado.a3 [ ¹22.¢h1 ¦ac8 16. ainda que pouco sedutor em prêmios.¦ac1 h6 18.J Stockholm izt 1962 Fischer. ¤bd7 12.] 25.R-Reshevsky.My 160 Memorable Games 8 [ Com 27.RGhitescu.. não o faria agora. Após uma despretensiosa abertura..h3 ver jogos. [ 14.exd5 ¤xb6 20. 35.¦b1 ¦b7µ seria forte.¤c6 Essa é a posição que as brancas procuravam..e5 7.' 30.£xd5 ¥xd5 14.exd5 ¥f5 16.ganharia uma peça. o qual. Fischer.¥xd5 ¦xd5 32. ] 1-0 B92 Pilnik. embora Pilnik faça tudo para evitar o inevitável.c4 ¥g6 15.¤g6 38..¤b6 [ 13.¦xb6 28. pode ser considerado pouco mais que rotineiro. Fischer conduz o jogo para um final igual.a5 ¤bd7 12.£f2? Descuido.axb4 axb4 25. 27..£xa5 ¦xb2-+ ) 19.£xb6 ¥d8 21.'] 14. de reativar o cavalo.¤d7 28.¦c8 a resposta 28.R-Bednarski.cxb4 ¦xb4 24.] 8.' a5 34.. [ 15. 37. por ambos contendores.h3 g5 36.etc.¦fd1!² com ligeira vantagem no final. Fischer. se 27.c4 b3!ƒ conservam a iniciativa. bxa3!³ 27.¤d4 ) 21. mate!) 38..¦xb6 16. Para 6.. por isso..¥c4 ver jogos 17.¥f3 é novamente melhor.a3 ¤b6 14.¤b3 ¥e7 [Para 7.M Varna ol 1962 Fischer. que lá resolveram permanecer após participarem das Olimpíadas de Xadrez de Buenos Aires de 1939.¦xf2 a2 29. por Bobby Fischer # 4 Tato e tática A presença na Argentina de Pilnik.¤d5 ¥xd5 20.¦xd5 ¤f6-+ ganhando no mínimo qualidade) 18.¥xb6! £xb6+= Fischer. nem a expansão da sua ala da dama.f3 [ 10. ' [ 37. Por exemplo: ¤d7! 18.¦c1 ¥xb2 ) 29.possibilitando fazer uma dama e.0-0-0 ¦d7!² Fischer.¤c4 ¤xb2! 14.Robert James Mar del Plata 1959 Minhas 60 Melhores Partidas..¤f3 d6 3.¦c2 [Stahlberg.¥b3 '!' 'As pretas estão completamente imobilizadas.f5 19..¦xa6 ¤xd5 31.c3 ¦bb8 20..J Habana ol 1966 Fischer.exd5 ¥f5 14..¤d5 ( 18.¤xd5 £xd5 13.g4 fxg4 37. 16.Herman Fischer.bxc3? £c6 19.dxc7 ¦c8 33..¥f3 bxa3 26.¤c4 15...¤a5? d5!µ Stahlberg. As brancas começam a baquear.dxe5 21..bxa3 ¦a8µ apresentam seus problemas..bxa3³ também seria adequado] 27.¤d2 ¤xe4! 'Unzicker.hxg4 'As pretas abandonam.¦bb7 ¦xc7 32.¦b8 ¤d6 35.¦b8+. pois não impede o desenvolvimento das pretas....¥xf4 ¥g5= com igualdade. 40 e 43.cxb4 [ 24.¦c7 ¤f6 29.bxa3 ¦a8 29.fxe5 dxe5 ( 20.a5 23..£c8 17.dxc7 ¦c8 33.] 23.¥f5 30.¤d5 ¤xd5 13.] 22. o empate agora parece certo.d6ƒ ] 21.¥e6 ver jogo 42.. provocou um renascimento enxadrístico.] 24.. As pretas tratam.£d2 £d8 17.¦bb7 ¦xc7 32.a4 £c7 11.. [ ¹29. R-Geller.£c7 [ 10.VGligoric.¥xd8 ¤xd1 12.f4 exf4 19.axb4 25. as pretas entram em colapso. ] 31.¤d4 g6 22.] 8..0-0 [ 8. Najdorf e Eliskases.£b4 ¦b8 22.£xb6 [ 27... à exceção de 26... T L e i p z i g o l 1 9 6 0 c o m j o g o i g u a l .¦f1 ( 29.. Unzicker. Com a entrada da artilharia pesada.hxg4 Se jogassem ¢f6 o lance (Se 37.] 13.£e1 Este sistema.R-Najdorf..¥e2 [ Para 6.G 25.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦d1 [ 12.¤xa8 ¤a4 16.¦c7 ¤f8 [Também sem esperança seria 30.] 6. 55 e 58. 1. atrasado.¤c6= c o m e q u i l í b r i o .] 19.¤c5= com igualdade.¥e3? ¥d8 19.b5 13.. Desse ponto em diante.e4 c5 2..¥g5 0-0! ( 8. atestado pelo torneio anual de Mar del Plata.¤f6 31.] 11... assim como qualquer movimento de torre.¥xc4 bxc4 16..WFischer. bxa3.¥f3 b4 23.¤a5? deixa as brancas com problemas. e um jogo intermediário que. apenas meio ponto atrás de Pachman e Najdorf.d6 '!' ¤d7 'O peão está obviamente imune..¥e6+daria a vitória as brancas.¦ab8? ~~ 'Pensei que se ele não tinha tomado o N no lance anterior..¤d5 ¤xd5 17. W-Fischer. [ 14.

¢g1 ¥xb1-+ vencendo.0-0 ¤bd7= Fischer.¦c7 Desesperadamente debatendo-se por um jogo de reação.¥b5! '>' ¦xa3 senão a4 32.¦e3™ Forçado..¥e7?! Fischer.. B) 14. Ragozin c6 2....£xb7 ¤d5!µ Fischer.R-Olafsson. 6.F/Belgrade ct/1959/ 1-0/ 'é bom para as brancas.a3 £a5-+ ] 8.RBenko. B) 41. Smagin.¦fe1² 'Agora.gxh5 ¤ge7= Fischer. mas depois de' '+/. certo seria 10.h5 gxh5 14.¢xd7 36.. a despeito de seu conterrâneo Tal acusar-me de "mau julgamento" por promover as brancas nesse ponto..¤e7+ ¢f8 33.P Bled 1961') 7.h3 ¥xf3 [ 4.V '"com vantagem".£h5 g6 9. Fischer... Com' A) 33..£g3 e6 8.h3 ) 6.g3 [ 7...R-Smyslov.f4 gxf4 15.¦e1+! ( 34.¤xe4!? ( 7...¥g2 e6= Suetin.¥e2 0-0 9.. com ele..£e2 '#' £e7 [ 13.¦xf7+ ¢d8-+ ganharia uma peça) 34.¢e8 34.¦xf3! 38.¦ac1 .¦e7 ¦f6 37. Fischer.£d3 £d5!= Fischer.£g4 +/-....¥b5?! seria refutado por ¥xb5 32.g4 ¥g6 8.¤g5!? ( ¹7.¦fc1 ¥xc4 36..e6! fxe6 13.¥xe4 ¦b1! 37.¢d8 35.¢g1 ¦h5!-+ ganharia ) 37.fxe6 8.Tigran V YUG ct Bled/Zagreb/Belgrade 1959 1.d4 dxe4 7.£e2± 'ameaçando Nxf7 e as pretas ficam com um jogo terrível.¥c4! e6 10.¥b5 a6 10.V/ Bled ct/1959/'] 5.¥d3 ¤bd7µ 'ameaçando .¤xd4 cxd4 18.R-Cardoso. 31.d4 [ 8.¥h5 5.£xe4 £d5! 9.¦f8+ ¢g7 As brancas a b a n d o n a r a m .¥g2 ( 35.. ( 35.£d3 ¢f7 13...My 160 Memorable Games 9 31.¦e1 ¦xd6 [Najdorf.¦xb1 ¥xe4+ 38.¤gf6 8....¦e1 e4! 35.R Portoroz izt 1958 'As pretas ficam com boa situação.£xd5 cxd5 10.£d2± 'ganhando um peão') 17.a3 ¥c5 8.¥e7?! parece ilógico.RSmyslov.¥d5 ¦a6-+ /\ Rxd6.¦c5 ¢g7! 37.dxe5 30.¥d2 seguido de 0-0-0.¤e5 ¥h7 8. 16. Smagin.. melhor seria simplesmente 7.¥g2? d4 9.. Fischer.¥g4 6.¦d8 35.¥xc6+ bxc6 11.e5 ¤e4 5.¦7xe4 ¦ff2-+ ganharia.e5! 0-0-0 18. 12.produziria um final de bispos de cores opostas] 29..¥xd7 fxg6= c o m i g u a l d a d e .BReshko/Leningrad/1961/) 7.d4 ) 7.g4 [ 32. Fischer..B/ Zuerich/1959/ '=' 'com bom jogo para as pretas..¤c4 ¤d7 17.0-0 £b6 12.dxe4 6.P Bled ct 1959 0-1. 7..P/ Belgrade ct/ 1959/1-0.¦c7 ¦d6 31.b5 ¤a5 22..¤xe4 ¤xe4 9.¤xe4 £xd4 8.¤e5 ¦c8 9.] 31.¥g2 ¦b1+-+ ] 37.d4 .P Bled 1961 '=!' 'é igual.R-Olafsson.¤xe4 ¤d7 7.¦e1 e4-+ arrasaria o jogo das brancas..¤b1 ¥xd2+ [ 9. ] 36.¢f1 ¥c6 44. Pf6..a3 £e7 17. 5.'.g5 h6 38.d4 .R-Benko.R-Keres..f6 11.¦xf3 ¥e4 39..B/Zuerich/1959/' '=' 'Fischer..V/Bled ct/ 1959/ '=' 'igual.£e2! ) 10..¤g3 ¥g6 ( 5.V' 0-0-0 18.hxg5 ¦h8+ 40..d6 ¦xc4! 34.h4 hxg5 39. ] 36.A '=' 'daria as pretas um final equilibrado. B) 33.R-Cardoso.¢g1 ( 37. Fischer.F/ Belgrade ct/1959/1-0/'] 4.c4 ¤c6 12.P/Belgrade ct/1959/1-0'] 10.£b6 9.cxd4 17. .A' '=' 'Suetin.£e2! ..¤e2± ] 9.¥f5 '#' 32.¥c4 ( 31...£xf3 ¤f6 '#' [ 5.0-0 ¤c6 13..h4 ¦g8 18.¤f3 ¥g4 [ 3.£xd4 8.¥e4+ 33.P Bled 1961' '=!' 'Fischer.R-Benko. embora eu tenha sido derrotado por Keres.P/Belgrade ct/1959/1-0 'com vantagem.h4!± Fischer...¥e7?! Fischer. 30. tal como em nossa primeira partida.¤xd2 £c5 14.¤f3 h6 16.¥c4 ¦c2 33...¤f3? h6 15.R-Larsen. ] 0-1 B11 Fischer.¦fxf7 ¦c8!-+ .B/Zuerich/1959/'.d3 [ 6.¥d3N 'dá as brancas u m a b o a l i n h a d e a t a q u e e m t r o c a d o p e ã o '.¤ed4 ¤c6 9..£e3 ¤bd7 8.¦c4 ¥b5!-+ também ganharia)..¦fc1 0-0-0 20.¥g2 a5 12. [ 31.R Portoroz izt 1958'] 6.¤xd4 17..hxg6 34.¥e2 Spassky.b4! ¢b8 21.h4 h6 7.¦c5-+ > e o Pd cairia.¥d2 [ 8. não queria envolver-se com esta linha.¦a1 ¦xa3-+ ] 30. 30.¤xg6+ 'com empate em perspectiva...¥xd7= ^.. [ 40.¥xe4 ¦e8-+ ) 35.¥f3 f5 32.a3 ¥xd2+ ( 12.¦c7 ¥b5 33.e5 ¤fd7 7..¦c3 [ 30.P Bled ct 1959 0-1.c3! £e7 15.¦cxf7 ¦f2 40.¤f6 4. Suetin..gxf5 gxf5 'e os dois peões do centro passados centrais deveriam vencer se' 39.] 32.. a diagonal do bispo está liberada e as pretas não podem bloquear sua casa e5.F/ Belgrade ct/1959/1-0/' 'Fischer.¥f3 ¥d3 34. Ne5'. 6.¦xe5 Caindo na armadilha.¤xe4 ¤xe4 8....¤xe4 ¥f5? 5. Fischer.R-Smyslov.¤f8+ /\ Sxh7 )..e6 6.d6 f5 33.£d1 h5 15.¥xf3+ 42.d6 ¢f6!-+ ] 34.¦d8 36.¥xd7+ ¢xd7 35..d4 dxe4 7. R-Keres.¥g2 c5 12.cxd5 ¤b4! ] 6.R Portoroz izt 1958' 'Fischer.¢g7 A) 41.fxe5 ¢b8³ >< e5 'as pretas consseguem plantar um cavalo em e5 de onde não pode ser desalojado' '>< e5'...e6? ( 7.e4! 36.hxg5 hxg5 18.¥d5 e4 38.¥b4 8.h4 ( ¹10..cxd4! exd4 ( 16.¦xc4 ¥d3 35.d4 e6 10. Uma tentativa recente é 7.¥f4± Fischer.A' 11. vencendo f a c i l m e n t e .d6 [ 34..h4 ¦g8 16.£xe4 ¤f6 10.¤xg6 hxg6 12. Petrosian.d4 e5!µ ..dxe4 4.0-0-0 d4 10.¥c4 ¢g7 32.¤xd2 e5 11..¦8f4 ¥d5-+ ( 41.RLarsen.M 35.R-Keres.d4 c5 7.V/Bled ct/1959/' '=' 'Fischer.¤e2! £b6 6.e4 .e6 7..¢g1 ¢g7!-+ 'e as pretas logo tomariam o Pd.hxg5 hxg5 19.R-Cardoso.R-Keres. C) 14.R-Keres.. 3.. 7..' 'Fischer.¥b5+ ¤c6 7.R-Larsen. 7..£b6 10. Fischer. 10.'.¦8f7+ ¢h6-+ venceria. aparentemente.¦a2 ¦a5 31.RKeres.exd5 cxd5 6.¤c3 d5 3.¦f6! 37.g5 A) 14.b3 ¤bd7 11..Robert James Petrosian.. Fischer.¦xc4 ¦xa3 37.¢g1 ¦g2+ 43. também ganharia o Pd6..¥d2 ] 7.R-Olafsson.. [ 36..¦d1 ¥a4-+ ) 31.¥d2 .g3 dxe4 7. o retraimento 12..£b3 e6 9..¥xe4 ¥xe4+ 39.f5 38.dxc5 £xc5 8. [ 37.P Bled ct 1959 0-1) 13.gxf4 £e7 16...¦b2! 31.£e2! para impedir .£d2 ..

¤d1 46....¦hf8! seria forte.. ' [ 17.) 30.h8£ £a7 38.¤c4 b5 ] 16......¦xa5+!+.£g7 ¦dg8! 31..¦a5 a6 23.¦xa6!+.fxe5 ] 18.¦b5!+....a4= '=' '=' ] 17. ' ¢b4! 41.£g7 .f4 ¢h8 15.' ] 28. as duas damas a p r o x i m a n d o .¥xf1 ¦xh7 33.¢c7 42.¦hf8! ] 24.£b8+= '=' '=' ] 37.£xh7 a3 'Petrosian estava contando com a velocidade de seu peão.£c3 Ragozin 27..£xd8+! ¦c7 31.' [ 24. 39.¦hf8 Ragozin . ¹22..bxc5 £xc5 18..£g8+ ¢a3 44.... Mais seguro seria 28.¤d7 16..¤b3 ¤xb3 19..c5ƒ 'e o Pc branco torna-se perigoso'.dxc3? 28.£a2? 40.¢g2 [ 45.¦d5± .£f3 ¦f8 21.¦xa3± se b5 20..£c1+ ¤b2+'ficando o cavalo fora de jogo.0-0 14......¦f7+ ¢b6 [ 25.£f6± 'com boa partida.' .My 160 Memorable Games 10 ¤d7 19..£ae7 40. respondeu: "não sei".£f7 'penetra' ) 21..¢g3 "An gross oversight.¦axa7 ¦xf7 29.¦xa5+ ¢xa5 32. tudo fica fantasticamente complicado!' 42.fxe5 fxe5 19..c4 ¤c3 '?' '#Ainda subestimando o perigo. O desenrolar do jogo indica que Petrosian pretende efetuar o grande roque sem tentar impedir Pf4.g4 ¢c5! 'Uma boa tentativa final.s e p a r a o g o l p e m o r t a l ." Fischer 'Tremendo equívoco.c3 0-0-0 20.£f7 ¦f8 33..h6 a2 35... mas despois de' 'Ragozin' ¤c3!= Fischer '=!' 'é possível as pretas empatarem..£xe5 ¦xf7 30.axb4 ¤xb4 ( 18.¤f3 f6 20.'vence' ) 20. Nd1.. Petrosian.£xb4!? Ragozin ] 20..£f6 £c5 [ ¹29...¦b7+ ¢a6 32.¤d6 ...£xc6± Ragozin '"com boas possibilidades de vitória". ' [ 30... 24.¦dg8 30.T Bled ct 1959 0-1.¤xb4 Ragozin 21.£d6 ..£d6! Ragozin 30.' '=!' 'Fischer'] 42.g5 ] 39.£xb4 21.¦xf1+ game ) 33....) 28.£g8 a1£ 37.'] 46.¤c4 ¤c6 ( 19.£xe3 dxe3 21.¦df8 29.£d6 ] 29. B) 17.a4 'Ainda jogando com negligente d e s c a s o ! ' [ ¹28.£cxa4+ ¤xa4 47. O Pb4 não pode escapar.hxg6 ¤e2# ] 30.£g7! ¢a6 ( 29...£h2! £f6 ( 39.£d6 .¦a7+! £xa7 31.¢f2 ¤xg3! 'com o que as brancas só teriam o recurso do xeque perpétuo com' 38.£xh7 ¦h8 35.£c2+!-+ 'ganha' ) 46.a4 30. 29. C) 28.'ganha..¦b7+ ¢a6 31.c5 £xc5 ( 42. conservando.' [ 39.h5 £xb4 'Realmente arriscado..¦fb1 ¤ca6 22.£xg6 £xg6 36. 29.£e7+ ) 42..... porém..gxh5 25.a3 ¤e8 [ 15.....¦hf8! . 24.e5! £e3+ 20..¦df8! 'Forçando o que parece ser um final favorável.¤d6! ¦hf8 21. (não sabendo qual o meu lance secreto) tendo analisado a situação durante horas.' 34.£h6 /\g4-g5-g6-g7-g8Q 'Agora as brancas devem tentar vencer com Pg4' '/ \g4-g5-g6-g7 -g8Q' £f7! 45.¤c7 20..b4 f6 e se 17. but probably best anyway. 13.£f2 ¦hf8 27.¤xc6 bxc6 22.£g6 43.£xf3 ¤d6 ( 21.b5 ( 17.' 31.fxe5 ¤xe5 ) 17..£d6 Ragozin 29. a iniciativa. 26.b4 cxb4 '#' [ 16...£c7 ¦hc8 32.¤c4 ¦f8 19. mas provavelmente o melhor a fazer. 32.¦f2 g6 [ 22.RPetrosian..£f2! ¤xf3+ ( 20.f6 17.'vence' .f5 ¤g8 16.¥e2! £gg5 44.¦a8 30..¦f1! ¦xf7 30..' [ 19.'] 14..£xe5 18.¦xa5++.¦f1? [ 28. ' [ ¹27.£g7 ¤e2+ 34.£g7 ¦dg8! 31..£d2 £xe5 23. but probably best .£c2 £b4 45.e5± 'torna a situaçã o das pretas difícil por causa de seu rei descoberto e do Pe passado das brancas. Estava muito surpreso por ele permitir-me tantos contragolpes.h7 '#' £d6? [ ¹36.¦f7+....£a3+ ¢b7 43.£d2 £h7! 47.¤a5 18.£xh8 £c5 31..¤c4? 'As pretas agora podem consolidar sua posição..¤e2+! 37.¦f7 ¦hd8 25.e5! ) 22. 27.£g4+ ¦d7 24.£d2 b6 23. 22.£xa2 ¤xa2 41.. M a i s s e g u r o s e r i a 27.£c5 Ragozin 27.£g8 a1£ 36.¤a5 ¤b5!µ [ 20..¦b7+ ¢c5 32.c4 dxc3? 28.¦hf8 Ragozin . Curiosamente.£c1+ ¢a2 47.¦hf8 27.£xb4 22.' [ 42.£a8!+'ganha uma peça'.bxa3 18.£b6+ ¢a3 34...'] 26.¦xf1+ game ..¤c4‚ ] 21..£xa7+ ¢b4 33..¥d1+! ) 43.¤xe5 18. D) 28..£xg7 'recupera o peão..£xa3+ ¢xa3 44.f6! [ 17.£h2 ¢b3! 'Escorregadio como enguia!# As brancas fazem um lance secreto..bxa3 18.£c7 ¦c8 32...£f6! A) 28..¦b7+ ¢c5 31.' 43.¦a4 ] 27...£b4+ ¢a6 ( 41.¦b7+ ¢a6 31.¦a7! ..g5+...¦a6+! .¢b8 18..e6! £xe6 22.' '"An gross oversight. 23.£b6++..¦fb1 ¤ca6 22..¦xf7 £xg3 19.c4! ¤c7 ( 27.¤xe5 fxe5 22...£a1 40.¤d6 .£g7 ¦cg8= '=!' 'empata com xeque perpétuo sobre a dama.£xf8+ ¢b6 41...£a8 'Pensei que fosse o fim...¤c4± ] 17...¤d6 ] 28..£a1 'Após o jogo um espectador perguntou a Petrosian se ele sabia que 42.£xh7 a3! ( 32.¤f3 ) 19..' '='] 30. D) 17.. 19.¤a4? 46.'] 40.fxe5! A) 17.'ganha' .'e faz dama.¦hf8 Ragozin ] 23..£c5 29.g4ƒ f6 'as brancas ficam com uma situação difícil de ultrapassar.¢b3 /\Nd1 [ 45..£xg6 ¦xf1+ [ 31...£f4 ¦he8 24.¦xf1+ game ..¦xh7! Ragozin 32. Seria normalmente de esperar que Petrosian procurasse simplificar para garantir um final vitorioso 23.c5 daria a vitória às brancas....e5!+. 39.¦xh7! 'Decidi então começar a jogar para ganhar.... B) 28.¦axa7+.¥xf1 a2 36.£xb4 23...£ae7! 'Forçado. 24..£xb4!? Ragozin . As brancas não podem mais vencer.£a8+ £a4 ( 45./\ Rfb1 -> 'seguido de Rfb1 e as brancas têm um ataque para vencer' '/\ Rfb1 ->'.£b8+= '=' '=' ] 32.. ¹22.. C) 17.£c7 ¦c8 33.¦f5! ... A seqüência renova a ameaça de . 28.£f2! a5 [ 26.h4 ¢b7 [ 23..£g7 ¦hg8 34.f4 0-0-0 15.£f8? [ ¹39.£xf8 40..axb4 ¢b8 19..£g8+ £b3 48...£xa7+ ¢xa7 44.cxd4 exd4µ Fischer.£a8‚ ) 40.¦hf8! é ainda certo.¤xe5 19.'.£xc6 ¤d1! ] 45.£a3 'Único lance capaz de evitar o mate em b2... defendendo-se da ameaça de Qxe5+.¦hf8 29..¦hf8! .c4! ¤c3 28.¤xb7! ¢xb7 24.¦hf8! ] 25..¢b8 26..cxb3 ¢b8 20. 26.axb4 ¤c7 'As pretas querem assegurar um bloqueio na ala da Q. o rei estaria mais seguro no campo branco onde tem a proteção do agrupamento de peões' 39.£xh5 ¦hf8 26. 32.¢h2 ¦xf1 35..£g7 ¦dg8? 30.£g4+! .

.-.£h5+ ¢d7 22.¦e3# [E] .0-0 10.¥b7 Wie ich später (Smyslov-Fischer.£xe4! '#' 48.b4+ ¢d4 27. A tomada do peão é insignificante. 19.¤d5 ¤xd5 18. sollte Schwarz zu b4!.¤xf6 [ 11..£h5 /\ 25... 25.¤xg7+ ¢f7 ( 12.dxe4 c2-+ ' g a n h a r i a '...¤f5 mit vernichtendem Angriff) 13.g6! 15.g5 ¤b6? [ 15. consegue um empate miraculoso. entretanto.£h5 ] 12.£h1!µ Petrosian accepte d the offered draw.. porque certamente as pretas têm a vantagem.¥xd5 20.£d2 £xb2 9. [ 9.0-0-0÷ [F] O texto dá oportunidade às pretas de corrigir seus erros iniciais.¦b1 £a3÷ [Fischer=:F] que tentei com sucesso posteriormente em minha carreira.¤a4 ¤d7= /\ 15.' 'Petrosian accepted the offered draw..Edgar Fischer.exd5 g6 E ) 16.¤ce2 ( 16.] 8.f5! e5 [ 16..¥d3 [Para 10. admitindo que estava pronto a abandonar no lance 36. "After having fought so hard for thedraw.. b4 não era exeqüível...b4! 16. d6-d5 [F]..¤f3 d6 3.b4! /\ Bb7..PFischer.¦g1+.b4? 17.] 13.axb5 18.. Empate' ] ½-½ B99 Walther.¤dxb5+..e4!µ 'Depois de lutar tão duramente pelo empate. jogando contra um mestre menor europeu.] 14...¥xf6? 12. comparada com a abertura d a s l i n h a s c e n t r a i s c o n t r a o r e i p r e t o .f6! gxf6 [ 17. d6-d5 F] 13. Como eu aprendi (ver partida 15).b4! seguido de 13.. Conforme disse Capablanca.fxe6 fxe6 19..f5 e5 E) 14..¤xe6 £b6 12.. greifen.] 14." Fischer 'Ofereci o empate receoso de que ele não aceitasse.¢b1 [A r r i s c a n d o r e p e t i r .e5 ¥b7 13.¦d8 26. Fischer aparenta estar batido depois de dezessete lances.£xf7+ ¢b8 26..m e ..E-Tolusch...g4 ver partidas 12 e 15..." Fis' [ 48.gxf6 12.¦he1 0-0-0!µ Paoli.£c7 24... [M e l h o r s e r i a ¹11..V-Fischer." Fischer' [ 47.E . O que torna memorável esta partida é o exemplo que ela dá de como um grande-mestre se redime.E ] 24.¤dxb5 £c6 19.¦he1 [[F] ¹12. "After having fought so hard for the draw.exd5 0-0 19..Para 10.b4 14.¤d5!+.g5!÷ ..£xc3+? dxc3 49.¥f5 ¦c5? 25.exf5 17. 48...My 160 Memorable Games 11 anyway......¤xf5 ¥xg5 20. [ ¹13.£e6 /\ 28...¤a5+.£f2? 'Eu estava algo abalado por ter deixado de ver o último lance de Petrosian!' [ 48..fxe6!+...g5!÷ ] 48.¥e2 ¤xc4 51. Aqui.¤a4 d5 E ( 15. quase sempre perde por falta de técnica para desferir o golpe final.. [ ¹12. Keres.£xf7+ ¢b8 27.£d1+? ¤xd1 49. however..g5 ( 49.. Walther se confunde e permite a Fischer prolongar a luta e encontrar uma saída no lance 54.£xg5+ +.¤c5÷ [F] ainda mantém a luta.A/Balatonfuered/1958] 12.b4 15.¤d5!+F/E ] 18..¥e4 £b6 [ 23. "o bom jogador sempre tem sorte".a3 é o b r i g a t ó r i o . 12..£b6 8...¤xd6+ ) 18.¥xb5! axb5 13.Robert James Zuerich 1959 Partidas Decisivas .S-Fischer.[F] As pretas estão em má situação.£c7 para impedir 9. ¢xe6 20..g5 ¤xf1 51. however. Petrosian was obviously unprepared to readjust his frame of mind and start playsing for a win.g5 £h4© ] 47. ¤xd5 [ 19. Bc4. portanto.. Não obstante. por Bobby Fischer # 9 Do prato à boca. Ludèk Pachman Victory in the Balance Minhas 60 Melhores Partidas.] 9.¤e6! fxe6 21. depois de começar a partida como um principiante e de como um adversário mais fraco.b4! /\ Bb7. ¹13..£f5+ ¢e7 21. B) 9. Petrosian was obviously unprepared to readjust his frame ofmind and start playsing for a win..£g3 dxe5 14. 16.¥g5 e6 7.¥xg5? 17.E ] 17..exd4 18..Qf7 E [ 24.g5 ¤d6 52.£c7 10.£f3 ¤bd7 [Mais exato seria ¹8.exd5 >< c6 E ] 20.¢f8 13. depois de magistralmente construir uma situação vitoriosa.¤ce2 ( 14.¢c7 25.¤d5! exd5 17.. com dois peões a menos.¤c6+!‚ Investimento sensato.gxf6 ¥f8 19.¥c4 A) 9.F .¥xe6! fxe6 11...¥b7 e .¤b3 £c6 21.¥g2 £h6µ ) 49.¦c8? Este lance é desvantajoso para as pretas pois as fazem perder a opção do grande roque. 16.¤f5+.R/Beograd ct/1959 / Smyslov.dxe4? ¤xe4+ 49.] 16.exd5 ¢d8 '#' 21.Qe5..¥f1+ ¢c3 28. 1.. De vez em quando.. sobald er dazu Gelegenheit hat..f4 ¥e7 [ 7..d4 cxd4 4.Re5 E] 24.0-0-0 Der Partiezug gibt Schwarz G e l e g e n h e i t s e i n e u n g e n a u e Zugreihenfolgeauszugleich en. seria 48.¤d7 [ ¹14. o lance seguinte de Walther rapidamente desfez essa impressão..£c7? 10. ¹48. 48...£c5? 20. gefolgt von Lb7 und d6-d5.Re5 E £c7 28.£h1! 49. 19.£f7+ ¢c6 23. ¥xc6 22.a3 ainda seria correto.¥xf6 S e m o b j e t i v o .-> com um ataque esmagador..[Euwe=E] [F/E] ganham.¢h4 ¤xd2 50.¥f5 /\ 25.R/Beograd ct/1959] 10.a3 ] 11.¤d2 0-0ƒ [F] com a iniciativa.¥e2 ver partida 14. 48. d6-d5 assim que surgir oportunidade.g6 ¤e8-+ 'e as pretas ganhariam novamente.£d5+E] 25.Un siglo de ajedrez magistral.£a8++.a3+ ¢c5 26.g4 [ ¹14.¥xb5+! ¢e7 ( 17..b5 11.¤c3 a6 6.R/Bled ct/1959...¤d7 )] 15. Ambos sofremos com a idéia fixa de que .¤xd4 ¤f6 5. [E] 11...¤b4+ ¢c5 24..a3 é necessário.e4 c5 2..fxe5 ¤d7 15.dxe4 ¤e3 50.£xb7 ¢xb4 25.. as pretas devem aproveitar-se de 12. ] 9.g4 e5 16..¤xe6! [F] Mas eu ainda achava que as pretas estavam bem.'. Gligoric.¥f5! F [ ¹25. 12.. A resposta certa.g5!÷ e com árdua luta....dxc6 £xc6 23. obviamente Petrosian não estava preparado mentalmente para reiniciar a luta em busca da vitória e portanto...¤b3 d5 17.g6 d3-+ 'ganharia'.£d8 20. 1959) lernte.¦e3! ..

¢g2 ¤e6 40. ¢c8 ( 59.£xd1+ 19.g4 ¤xf3+ [ 15.¥g4 ¦h8 41.h4 ¥d7 15. 11. coroar na casa preta h8.£xe5!+.¢a5 ¢b8 56.R Zürich 1959 12.f5 e5 14.bxa3 ¦xf3 51.R ch-USA 1957 0-1] 11.¢a6 ¢b8 59.¦e8! ] 38.] 54. 14.¤e6+ ¢xf7 21..¢g3 ¤e6 38.£xe4 ¤xe4 20..f5 b4 15.a4 ¦b8! 45.¥g7 [ ¹30.¢xf7 40..£f3 £c7 9.f8£+..¤xc7 ¦a7= .b6+ ¥xb6 63.b5 ¥a3 ( 56.¦e6+ [ 39..e4 c5 2.c4 ¥g7 28.¥g5 e6 7..¦d1 ¢f8 34.gxh5 exf3 18.¤xd4 ¤f6 5. mas eu queria ver o que ele faria a seguir.¤f5 ¦e8 Bernstein.c3 ¤f6 6. ( Com 63.¢a4? ¥c5 58.¢f3 ¤d4+ 37.£d5+..¥xe4 ¥xe4 19.¥e4 [ 44..¥b5+ ¢c5 67.¢a4 ¢c6 63.¢b3 Hier gibt Wade.¥h3 ¢b8-+ ) 14.¥f8 32.axb5 axb5 37.¥e3 ¤e6 30.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¢b1 e5 17.¦c3 £b7 [ 29.¥f3 ¦e1+ 47.a5 ¢a7 57.¦d3 ¢e7 35..] 38.¦he1 b4 13.¢b5 ¢d7 54.b6+ é neutralizado por ¥xb6! ) 59. Fischer" eine falsche Zug.b6 ( 57..¥xf6 [ 11.¦1d7 h5 pretas abandonariam...¤bd2 0-0 9.¢b3 ¥d2 64.dxe5 ¤xe5 15.¥e8 [ 67.b6+ ¢b7 62.¤d5!? exd5 14.¥xd5 16.a4! /\ 36.¦a8?! [F] Caminho errado..¤c3 a6 6.b6+ ) 57.¥g4 f5 32..¦xa6+ [ Eu ainda estava p e n s a n d o e m d e s i s t i r d e p o i s d e 38..¢e7 39. 37. as brancas simplesmente de deslocar seu rei para e4.¦xf3 50.¦e1 ¦e8 10.¥f2 remisiert auch ) 61.a4+. 12.¦g3 ¥f8 32.¥e1 ½-½ C87 Fischer.¦he8 30.a4 ) 60.¢a4 ¢c6! 66.] 49.¤d5 ( 15..b4 ¢b8 56.¥d1 ¦e8 25.¦d5 [ [ F ] A a m e a ç a s e r i a 48.¦xd2+ [ 49.. 12.f5³ ) 14.b4 d5 12.¦g1 g6 15..b4! ¢c7 55.¦xe5 b4 adjourned A partida foi suspensa..a6 ¢b6= )] 58.....¢a7 ¥c5 ( 60... o que criaria uma situação de zugzwang.R Zürich 1959.¢b3? ¢g6-+ ganharia uma peça) 49..b5 ¥f2 59..h6 ] 21.a3 ¤b6= Gligoric.g5 ¤d7 13.[F] seria também sem esperança para as pretas.0-0 ¥e7 7.S-Fischer.¥g7?? 38.¥xf6 12.¢d6! [ 37.£xe2 ¦xe2 24.gxf6!? ''!?' Bulletin.. [Com 37.b5 ¥f2! 62.¢a7 57.¥b5 a6 4.¤xf7³ ).Fontana etc.¤de2 ¤b6 'N' 15..¢c4 ¥g3 58.¦xh8 ¥xh8 39.£d5 £b7 31.£e3 £b6µ .Svetozar Candidates Tournament 07.¦he1 0-0-0 'N' 14.¥h5 ¦e4 33.¢g2 ¦e8 [ 20.d4 ¥d7 8.¥xc4 bxc4 19.fxe6 dxe4 17.¤xb5 £c5 19.¢e4+..h4 b4 ) 15..h3 ¢f6 43...¥e3 ¤d5 26.f5 [ 12..¦e8!+As pretas não tinham como se mover.¤d5 ¥xd5 18. [ 54.¦xe4 dxe4 16.¥d3 E ] 44..¥e2 [ 62.h6 c6 22.¥h3 ( 14.Svetozar Fischer.¤xf6 Walther.b6+ ¢b7 65.a4 ) 61.¢b3 ¥d2 ( 60.c5 ¤d4 31.Kb3). [Fischer] h4 38..¢b7? 38.axb6+ ¢xb6= ] 62.E-Fischer.etc..exd5 ¢b7 19.¥xb5! ] 12.¢b1 ¤c5 14.¢f3 ¤d4+ 39.exf7+ ¢f8 18.. O'Connell "The Games of Robert J..0-0-0 ¤bd7 10.f4 ¥e7 8.a3 ¥b7 ( 12.¤xf3 ¤xe4 15.¤f3 d6 3.¢d3 ¢d5 42.¦a7+ ¢f6 40.¦xh8 ¦xh8 34.h5 E ] 29..a4?= A tese em que se apoia a defesa das pretas nesta situação é a seguinte: conseguindo as pretas trocar o B pelos peões. 60.¦xd6?? £h1+ F/E ] 30.¦c1 ¤c7 29.¢c5 64.. [ Accoring to Fischer is this the played move: 58.¥f3+ ¢d6 43...S-Fischer.¢c2 ¦f1! 48.. [ 30.Deveria ser decisivo. Estranhamente comecei a sentir que a situação tinha boas perspectivas de ser contornada..¦b8÷ ) 13.F ] 39. [F] ] 50.c3 ¢c7 Normalmente o jogo terminaria aqui..¦f1+ com empate.¥b5+ ¢c5 Empate.¤c3 ¤c4 18. "Qualquer semelhança com xadrez é mera coincidência"..¥e2 ( 59.folge (und Zügeanzahl!) an (siehe Variante 58.My 160 Memorable Games 12 ¥h6 [ ¹28.f5 ( 15.¤xd6+ ¢b8 20.¦b5 ¥d6 44...Robert James Candidates Tournament 22.¦cd3 [ 31. Os peões brancos estão bloqueados.¢b1 ( 49. 37....E ] 31. ' [ 11.¤dxb5 axb5 18.¥xd1 ¦xe8 ] 19.f4 ] 16..¢f3= ] ½-½ B99 Gligoric.¢c8 58..¦xh5 ¦xa3+.¥g2 ¥b7 13.¥e3 63.¦e8!+.¥a4 d6 5..h4 0-0-0 15.¦g8 ¥e7 33..¢f3 [ 36.0-0-0 15.b3 £c8 20..10.e4 e5 2..¢c4 ¢e7 53.. ¹44.1959 1.-¦f2+ 49.¤c5 14..¥d3+.¦e8 Minha primeira ameaça em toda a partida 45.¢b1 ¥a3! 50.¢b1 ¦b8 20.¢a4 ¥d2 60.¥f2 também empataria.¦d2 [ 49..¢c7 55..Robert James Gligoric.¤xe6 £c4 17..¥e4 £a7 35.Rd6 ¦d8 36....¦xd6 ¦xh3 51.¥g6 17.¢xd2 h4 51.¥b3 ¥g4 13.] 48.e5 ] 17.¥g2! e as pretas ficariam em zugzwang.h3 ¥h5 [ 13.exd5 ¢f8 15.¤xe5 ¦xe5 17.¦xd8+ ¢a7 34.¦f2+ 49.1959 1..¥h3 ¤c5 16..¥e3 60..¥xf3 14.¦c6‚ E ] 30.10.¥h5 ¥e1 61.¥d1 ¤e6 36..£xb6 ¤xb6 22.h3 ¢d6 39.a3 ¥f8 11. 41.b7 ¥f4 65.¥e1 59.¦d3÷ ) 15..g4 b5 11.¢a2± Mednis.¥xg5+ 16.¤xf7 Gligoric-Fischer/Bled 1959 (20) ( 20..¤xf3 dxe4 [ 16.a6 ¢b6= ] 67.¤g5 ] 14.¥d6 61.exd5 ¦c8 17.EFischer.R/USA-ch/1959/..¦f5+ ¢g7 46.¥f8 E ] 31..d4 cxd4 4.¥xe6 fxe6 16...¦xb7+ ¢xb7 36.¢c2 ¦h5 40.. (Fischer) dxe5 33.¥c5 60.¦xe8 £xe8 [ 18.¢a5 ¢a7= ) 57.¥c2 £e2 23.a4+.¦d5 ¥e5„ F .£b3 £b6 21.¥g6 16.£xf3 £e1+ 20..f7 Muito eficiente.¥d2 gxh6 27.cxb4 ¥xb4 42.E ] 37.a3 ¥b7 ( 13. as brancas ficam com o "bispo errado" para o peão h..¤ce2 d5 16..¢d3 ¢f6 52.b7 ¥f4 68.¥g2 ¥b7 12..¥d3 ¥b7 13.

¢f4 ¥d1 34.¢c5+.¢d5 ¢b7= ) 58.¦h7+ ¢g8 40.¦h5 53.¢a6 ¦h6+ 59.¢b6 ¦b8+ 58.fxe6 fxe6 16.¦xh7+ ¢g8 37.¦c5 ¦xc5 54.¦g3 fxe6 .¢f2= ] 24.¥xc4 ( 20. 14..¦d8+ ¦g8 24.¢h8 [ 14.¦e1 £b6! ] 17. 20..¢c3 b4+ 27.¢xd1 +/. 17.¤xe7 £xe7= .¦d6 [ 22.¦c7+! ¢d6 ( 53.¢xb5 ¦b8+ 56.My 160 Memorable Games 13 Padevsky.] 53.gxf6 bxc3 17.£b3 ¥xf3 9.b4 13.£xe6+ ¥xe6 19.¤xe6+.fxe6 ¥b7 ) 17.£b7 '!' 17.¤xg4! 23.¤g3 d5N ] 12.¦d6= ] 28..dxe4 18..¢d2 ¥f3 31.¦d3 ¢e5 52.¤f5= Kholmov.V ¦g8! 16..¢xb4 ¦b8+ 56..¦xf6 £d5 '>=' 26.¦f6 £g5+ [ ¹27.¤xe6 £d7 17....b4 50.£xb2!-+ ] 21.¢a6 ¢c5= ) 58..Robert James Euwe.£g7# ] 22.¢d4 ] 41.) 21.£xg6 hxg6 25.¤fxe7 ¥xe6 ( 20.] 42...¢e3 ( 24. ' A) 19.¤xf5 ¥xf5 16.¦b6+.¤f4 £c8 16..Theodor Fischer.¤d5 £xe6 18.exf7 ¤xf7 20.£xe7 20..b4 ¦h3 52.¤f4! ¤d3+ 22..¦g7? 41.¥b5+ ¤xb5 12.Kd2 Bd6 with the threat of Ra8.exf7 £xf7 ] 20.¢b5 ¦a8 55.. 24.¢a6+..¢c3? £a5+ 25..£h6 [ 21.£xg4 ¦xg4 22../ +.£f6+ ¦g7 28...£xg5 ¦xg5 29.] 27.£xb7 ¤xd4 11.¤f5! ' ' ! ' B u l l e t i n .0-0 dxc4 8..¦d8+ ¢g7 24...gxf5³ ] 14...¢xg8! 25.¤ce2 ¥b7 14...N-Evans.¦xf7 ¥g4 30.c4 ¤f6 5.¤ce2 [ 14.¦b7+ ¢c8 58. ' [ 13...¦c1 ¦h8? [ ¹52.¢xc5 ¢c7 55.¦xg4™ [ 23..¢e5! [ 34..¤c6!! ¤xc6 19.¦c5 ¢d7 55.¦xd3+.¥d8 20.¤c3 ¤c6 6..¢a4 ¦a8+ 55..£xf6+ ¦g7 24.£d2 ( 19.¥e2 £d8 20.¦xb5+..¢b7 [ 49..¥d7! [ 21...0] 14.U R S 1 9 6 4 1 .Qd7 14.¥e2 Gligoric.¤d5 £c5 19.b3 [ 45.¦f4 £g5 25.fxe6 fxe6 17.¦xd7 e2 29. 19. when all Black's pieces are pointed at his king.¤f5 [ 20.£h6 ¢h8 15..¤dxe6 ¥xe6 ( 17.¦c7 ¥g4? [ ¹37.¥f5= ] 34...g5!? b4? ( 14.¦g1+ ¢h8 17..¦xf8 ¢xf8 33..fxe6 bxc3 ( 13.¤ce2 exf5 15.¦xe6? ¤xh6-+ ] 23.cxd5 ¤xd5 8..¦b1 ¦d8 Another mistake.£xf6+ £xf6 26.¢e6 51. 16.RB r o n s t e i n .¦b8+ 54.£xb5 ¤xc3 13..¤c7 ¦b8 23.¤xf6 ¦g7 ) 21.. B) 19.e7+..¥d7 15... 11.¥h3 '!' [ 32....fxg6 17..£xd7+.R ) 15.exd8£ ¦axd8 ) 20.¢b3 £a4+ 26.c4 e6 3.¦g1 [ 16.£c6+ ¢e7 13.£b7 .¦d6 '=' £f5 [ 26. 14..¦c7 ¢h8= ] 38.£d5 28.. ' fxg5 ( 14.¢b6 ¦a2 48..fxe6 fxe6 16.Nxd5+ Qxd5 and Black has nothing to worry about.¢b8! 58.¥xc6 exd4 This zwishenzug saves a pawn unless White wants to play 11 cxb7 Bxb7.¦xb5 ¦d7 18.¥d3 d5 6.¢a5 ¦a8+ 57...¢xb5? [ 53.¤xe7+ ¢f7 20. 15.£xf5 24.L Habana ol 1966.¤f3 ¥g4 7.¥b5 e5 10.¦xh2? 42.¢d8 54.) 56.¦b1 ¢f7! [ 43..a3 ¢e6 45...¤d5! ) 14.Bxa7 Kd7 21. 12.£d5 ¦ge8µ /\ Bf8...fxe6 fxe6 16...fxe7÷ ) 15.exf5 15..¥f5 ¦g1 '>=' 36.e3 0-0 5.¦xf6 £e5-+ 26..¦e1+ 33..bxc3 £d7 Black should have created some space for the king with 14.¦xa6? ¦xa6 27. as well as allowing White to play.exd5 cxd5 4.¦xh2? 44.¤c4 20.exd4 bxc6 12.) 54.£h3 0-0! ''!' Bulletin.¢xa6 ¦xa3+ 49..¦xe1 ¦xc2 43.¤xe6 £c8= ] 16.¤d5 .¦xg8+? [ ¹24.¤xe7 [ 19.e5!! Kholmov.e7 ¥xf5 21..¢xb5 ¢c7= ] 49.g6 ( 16...d4 d5 3..¢b7! ¢d6 56. 14.¢c6 ( 58.£xe6 21.g5! ''!' Bulletin.e5 instead....¢f2? ¦h1 ] 32.¦xc8 ¢xc8 57./ +-.¥d7 14.£a5 .¤gxf6 £g6 24.¢d2 ¤f3+ 24. exploiting .c5 break and plays for .¢b1 ¤xg4 ] 22...¢b6 ¢d7 51.¢a7+..¤xe6 ( 17....¥xg4 22.fxe6 ¦ac8 19.¢d5 55. +.£e3 ¥b7 21.d5! ''!' Bulletin..¤e5 14.£b7 ) 18. f6 19.¢d4 e1£! [ 41.£h6 £e7 18.¢c7 59.a3 d5! 20.¢b5 ¢b7= ] ½-½ E51 Ghitescu.) 55..¦h3 ¢d4 54. b5-b4.¦c3 e2 40.¢d3+.¢b6 ¢c8= ) 50.dxc5 ¥xh2+ 0-1 B13 Fischer. 13.¦d1! exd1£+ 30.¦d8+= ) 23.£xa6 £f4+-+ ] 25.b4 14.¦h4 56..¢xb5 ¢b7= ] 53.V ] 13.fxe6 [ 17.¢e2 18.fxe6 fxe6 .e5± Smagin.¦d1 ¦xd1 20.¢c5 ¢d7 47..gxf6 ¥xf6 16.¥g5 ¦e8 13..£h6 ¥xd1 23.g5 !.¦e3 ¦g2 [ 40.gxf6 ¤g4µ ) 16....¤f4 ¦g8 16.¤h5 ¦g8 18.£xc4 21.¢d6 [ ¹49.¤e5 [ 12.. 14..¤xg4? 22.¦d1+ ( 50..e4 c6 2..£d3 c5 Opening up the a8-h1 diagonal for his bishop and eliminating the weakness on c6.£b7? 27....e2 38...£h6 £a1+ ( 22.¦g6 21.f6.¦b4 59.¢e2?? £e1# .exd7+ ¥xd7 15.'+/.£h6 ¢h8 17. 16.¢xd1 ¢d7 21.¢b3 ¦c8 56..¥xg4 ¦xg4 39.¤f5+ ¢g6 25.e3 35.£h6! ( 20.¤xf6 ¦g7 19.¦d6? £xa2 22..£xg1 20...£d8+ ¦g8 29. The a-pawn needs the support of the rook.¦xg4 ¦xg4 23.¢xb5 ¦b8+ ( 55.¤xg8 ( 21.] 44.¦b8 The threat is Bc5.Smagin.¦e7 ¥xc2 35.¦c6+ ¢d7 ( 54.exd5 ¥xa3 ) 19.Ra5 Rb7 19.¢xd1 ¢g7 31.Rxa7 Rxa7 20.¥xf5 23....b4 15. 7.g5± ] 15.¥xe6 18.S £b7 17.¦g3 ¦b8= ] 50.] 19.¥e3 £xb5 17.¦c1 ¦h8 57. D c h ..¦xg8? [ 24..h4 b4 13..gxf3 e6 10.¥xc4 ¥d6 9.¢c4 ¥e6+-+ ) 24..¤c3 ¥b4 4..Robert James Leipzig 1960 1.exd5? exf5! ] 17.¢f6 ¢h8 '=' 39.¢c5 ( 58.¢b6 ¢e4 53...Max (Machgielis) Leipzig Olympiad 1960 1...¤f3 ¤c6 Black forsakes the traditional .£xg4 21..¢c4 ¢b8! [ 57.£d4 £a5 ) 20.fxg5! 15.¢e1 ¦f8 32.¦dxf6 e3! 27.¦xf7 ¦g1! 28. 14...¦b6 ¦h8 57..d4 ¤f6 2.. GligoricFischer/Bled 1959 (25)'.¦xh2 46.. ' [ 16.h4 ¢d6= ] 45.¢e3 ¦g1 32.

decided Fischer was not 'at ease' playing the White side of these lines.R-Bisguier.h4 h6 10.£xa3 1-0 Fischer. and perhaps decisive advantage. 21. Can you figure it out? £xf4+ and White resigned. (After a few reversals.¤e4 ¥f5 11.bxc3 b6 7.¤c5+ ¢b8 29.¥xa6 ¤xa6 10.A/New York 1957/ MCD (41) ] 5.Nf3 Re8! ¥e6 12.h5 ¤f5 18. 8. There is a better move.f4 d6 7.e5 This advance has disappeared completely from the tournament scene..¦c7+ ¢d3 35. Do you see it? 36.c4 ¤c6 36.a5 f5 30.. Most young players today cannot even tell you who Winawer was or when he lived.¦b5 £e8 35. who began to show its seamier side.. Black has now secured the initiative. He used it in Soviet Championship tournaments. But Tal . VERY risky .¢f2 ¦xe6 20.¤xb6 ¤xb6 38. 4.0-0 £f7 13.¤d7+ ¢b7 30. I guess he decided that he did not want all that material to go forever unused! [The main line today is 5.¤d7+ ¢b7 36.¦xc3+ ¢xc3 It looks as though Black is about to enter a long period of suffering after 36.¥e3 c5 Black moves quickly to undermine White's center.¦b1 £f8 32.£g4 ¦df8 21.¦b4 ¤f5 41.a5 c6 20.¢f1 ¤xf3 and the end comes quickly.e4 0-0 5. But then Black will sacrifice the bishop for the pawn.¢g4 a3 51.¢f2 ¦g6 30. faced with checkmate.£xg4 ¥xd3 15.£g4 f5 8.£d1 ¤xg3 26.¢g2 ¤e3+ 26..¤g3 0-0-0 20.e4 e6 A surprising decision.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¤f3 £c7 13.¢xe3 Now Fischer provides an aesthetic conclusion to the game.) The move 5. very.¦b7 ¥f8 26.c4 ¦xa3 23.Robert James Leipzig Olympiad 1960 1. and probably the best and most solid choice for Black at this point.) But after several losses.. 4. ¤e8 6.¦b1 ¦a3 35.¥d3 ¥a6 13.My 160 Memorable Games 14 the pin on the back rank.£f8+ ¢d7 41.d4 ¤f6 2. It was actually one of the original ideas of Winawer.h6 gxh6 28.£h1 ¤g4+ 28.dxc4 £d7 38.¦a1 b5 52.¦d1 ¦d4 46.a6 ¦xc3 32.¤e2 ¤ge7 19.¦g1 ¦d2+ 47.£a4 ¢a8 34.¢f4 ¦xg3 49.¤g3 11...¦xe3 ¦xe3 23.¥f3 ¦xe3 22.¦g1 a4 45. at the time this game was actually played.£g4 ¤g6 8.¦h1 a5 44. especially a noteworthy loss to Unzicker at an earlier Olympiad.¦b7 ¥d4 34.£a1 dxc4 37.£b1 White's queenside ambitions are unrealistic. Koblentz .£g5 ¤ce7 17.¤c5+ ¢b8 32.¦e1 ¦ae8 The pressure on the e-file and the active position of the minor pieces give Black a clear.¥g5 £c2 23. 0-1 C17 Fischer. ¢c6 22.. The dual purpose is to support the advance of the fpawn.Kxf4 Bh6++ ¤g4+ 25.¦a3 g5 19.f4 ¤f6 18.¥e3 £a1 34. 17.¦b5+ ¢c6 28.£b4 ¤c8 27.£g3 ¥a6 9..¥d2 h5 11.a5 ¤xa5 33.£b3 £g4 31.£xc4 ¦a8 17.g3 £xd4 33.g4 hxg4 14.dxc5 ¤c6 9.cxd6 exd6 10.cxd3 ¤c6 16.£c2 ¦fg8 31.¤c3 £f5 26.B/Santiago 1959/MCD (52).¥xc3+ .e5 c5 [ 4.¦xg4 ¦xg4 43.d4 d5 3. 29.a4 ¥g7 24.Ba5 was later picked up and revived by a whole generation of young Soviet players in the 1930's and the 1940's.f5 e4 15.¦b5+ ¢c4 33.¦h3 ¢b8 22.¥xa7 g5 The only way Black can get his pieces into play is by moving the bishop to g7.a3 ¥a5!? This line was considered very.£xa3 ¦a8 24. Winawer Variation 1.¥e5 1-0 E70 Letelier Fischer.¦xb6+ ¢c8 39. 2.£d1 £a2 37.fxg3 ¤c6 27.¦b6+ ¢d5 It is not clear why Fischer repeated the position.Robert James Tal.and his trainer. but it was time for the queen to leave the d-file anyway. especially in his younger days.RIvkov. 23.¢f2 24.¥g5 dxc4 15. Therefore they decided it would be a reasonable try against Bobby.¥b8 ¦c8 31. and even at the World Championship level.¢f3 ¦d3+ 48. ¥b4 The Winawer System.a3 ¥xc3+ 6. dxe5 14.¥g5 £d7 9.£b3 ¤e7 25.) The Winawer is both the main line.b6 5. opening theory had branded this whole line as being completely unsound.c4 ¤e7 14.£xf3 £xc4 40. White is overextending his center.c6 ¦g4 42.¦b1 a2 0-1 Fischer.¤c3 Fischer almost always played this move . (This line did not do very well against Smyslov.a4 ¢b7 12.a4 £a3 25.¤e7 5. Probably he had not worked out the sinning moves yet.gxf3 f5 This is much stronger than grabbing the weak pawn at e6. and Black will be able to strike back easily.exd6 Bxb2 13.Nxd6 Nxd6 12.fxe6 exf3 16. but he later stopped playing it entirely.¥d2 f4 18.¤e2 0-0-0 11.axb6 axb6 21.a3 ¥xc3+ 6.£c3 ¤d5 16...¦b8 ¥g7 27.£f3 £a4 12. For example: 24.¦c1 ¦d3 50.¤a4 f3 28. But it was Botvinnik who really forged this line into a coherent and viable system.c5 £xd4+ 39. (Invented by one of the better masters who ever lived. Tal had done much work with these lines in preparation for his matches with Botvinnik.¢f2 ¤d4 27.¦c1 £b2 24.¦b6+ ¢d5 25.¥f6 ¦hg8 29.£xd4 ¤xd4 40..¥e2 ¦fe8 19.bxc3 £d7 7.£b3 ¤ac7 22. as Tal had usually played VERY poorly with the French Defense.c4 g6 3. but this has a tactical flaw.Mihail Nekhemye Leipzig ol 1960 French Defence.a7.

¤xe5 ¤xe5 17.£g3 h4 15.¥xd4 ¥xd4 15.¦e5 b6 40.. 6.¥d6 ¢d7 28..¤f3 ¥d7 16.¤f3 ¤bc6 10." (Mednis 74)) 20.c3 ¦ac8 18.£xd4² .¦c3 £d7 30..0-0 ¥d7 15.¢f2 ¥xc7 29..¦fb1 ( ¹28.¦g1 £e4 ) 33.¢f8 8.£xg7 ( 8..¦d1 h4 23.¤d6+ ¢d7 13. White has a marvelous position: pressure on Black's somewhat shaky center." (Schwarz 67) gxf6 Alekhine was the first to clearly demonstrate.¥g3 ¥e8 25.0-0! 0-0-0 14.£xb7 ¦b8 27.£e1? ( 29.¥xb5 34.£xh5 d3+ 22..¦fd1 ¤h8! Gligoric-Sokolov 1956.£d4 ¤c6 18.¢d1 ¤xa1 23.£d2 ¤bc6 10.¢h1 ¦he8 17.¦xe2 a4! 37.hxg4 ( 22..¤h4! "With this and the following series of fine moves.¥g5 £d7 10.¤fd4 0-0 17. ) [ Today theory recommends that White play: 7...¥g2 b5 15.£b2 d4 26.¦e1 £g7 42..g6 8.¤bd4 £a7 23.¤b3 £b6 20.¦e1 £e4 .¤xc7 £xc7 25.h3 £e7 24.g5 ¦e7 24.¥xg6 ¥g5+ 20.0-0² ( K e r e s 6 9 )) 12.£xg7 ¦hg8÷ (eco 74/81)) 14. while Black's King can find himself uncomfortably open soon.¥xb8 ¥xa4+ 25.bxc3² ¤e7 7.¥a3 f6 13. 8.¦a4 a5 32.¢h2= (Mednis 74)) 39.a5= ..¤xc7+ £xc7 11.A-Rios Torondell.¥d3 £xf7 19.¤e7 [ 7... This is a sharp idea originally of Rubinstein's that was later deeply analyzed and nearly perfected by Alekhine..¥xg4? ¤e4 23.cxb4!? 7.¦fd3 ¦xd3 28.¦xh4 ¢e8 21..h6 14.cxd4 ¥b6 30.¥a3 ¥d5 31.¢g1 ( 31.¦e1 a5 36.£g5+ ¢h7 38.¤b5‚ bxa3+ 8.£xc7 ¦xb1+ 28.0-0-0 ) 13.¢d2² ¥d8 11. and basically a gambit for White.£xh1?? ( 30.¤bxd4 a6 12.¦xf3 ¦d8 27.c4!± (Keres 69.¤g6?! ( ¹12..¤xf7 ¦h5 18.. J/Hartford 1964/EXT 2001 (37).b4! A very good move .axb7 ¦b8 19. The blocked nature of the position makes winning attempts for either side less than f r u i t f u l ..dxe5 ¤gxe5 16.0-0 0-0!? (Ivkov) ) 12.f4 a5 12. open diagonals for both Bishops.£e3 f5 24. [ It is far too dangerous for Black to grab one ...£e1 ¤xd4 16. 14.£xc3 ¤xc3µ (Schwarz 67)) 22.h5 ¦c8 14.¢f2 "Fischer evaluates this position much too optimistically and plans to husband the extra Pawn to victory.¦de8 15.£h5 h6 17.g6 ( 38.¤b5 £b8 24..¦a1 ¦b5 37.¥a6 ..¥e2!± (Schwarz 67) ¥c6 25...¤e2 ¥e6 13.0-0 .£d2!? ¦h1 30.¤c1 ¤xc1 33...¤b5 £xe5+ 10.¥d6 ¥xc6 24.¥xc6 ¤xc2+ 22. " ( M e d n i s 7 4 ) ¦de8 16..g3 ¤c6 14. The damage done by White's 20 f4? is now very obvious.A/Riga 1954/EXT 2000/[ChessBase] (41)] 7..£e3 ¤e4 26.s q u a r e ." (Mednis 74) 22.¤xf5 gxf5 22.¤xd4 g6 18.g7 a1£+ 40.¦a1 ¥d3³ ( M e d n i s 7 4 )) 30. for the strategic objective of locking in White's QB.£g4 ¤h6 16..¢g3 ¤xd4 31.¥xb4 ¤bc6 14..J/Spain 1998/EXT 2003 (22) .¥g5 ( 8.exf6! "Weiss will auf den dunklen Feldern zu eimem Ubergewicht kommen.£xe7 £e4 37.¥e3 c2 36.¥d6 £a5 18.£d5 ) 28.¥xd4 ¥xd4+ 17. 33.bxa5 dxc3 9.¦xh1+ 32.£e3 ¤f7 19.. but is as good a try as any. " (Schwarz 67) ¤f5 19.RR o s s e t t o . 13.¥xh6 ¦xh6 17.¦h1! 30.h3! "Fischers Plan sieht gut aus: er will den Laufer auf der Diagonale h2-b8 wirken lassen.¦b1 ¤c6 21..¥c5 ¢b8 20...c3 ¤e7 9.¦eh7 ( 27.£g4!? A very sharp move .¦e5 £xe5-+ ) 38. cxd4 The book line.d5! £xd5 29.¤c3 ¦b3 32.¢h4 ¦xc3 33.e3+! 31. It is not good enough.bxa5?! dxc3= ) 8.a2?? 39.¤ce7! "Uhlmann gruppeirt um.¥d3 ¥b8 11.¦fb1 ¤d8 16.¤xd4 ¥xb7 27..£b2 ¤e7= 11..a6 ¤b4 16.¦b2 Klavin-Fuchs 1961) 15.¥d6 ( 14." (Mednis 74) ( 33.£e1 £d8 33.¦xb1 ¥xa4 32.¦fd1 (Schwarz 67)) 28.£g3 ¤c6 11.¥f3 £xc3 25.¥e2 f6 ( 11.fxe5 15.¥d2 axb4 13.¤xd4 £b6 16.¦xe6 a3 38.¤ce2?! f5 9." (Schwarz 67) ( 14.d5!? ) 27..h4 ¥d7 13...£h4 ¤ec6 17.¥f3 ¥xf3 26.h4 £a8 39...£f3 ¤f5 11.¦e7 ¦e8 35.¥xe7 ¤xe7 15. eco 74/81) dxc4 20..¤d6+ ¢f8 10..¤f3 h5 14.f4? "But this brute force attempt at an immediate win spoils everything.¢h1 h5 19." (Mednis 74) ( 20.a4 £f8 41. 7.¢e3 ) 29." (Mednis 74) 29.¤b5! ¥c7 8.¤e2 ¤b3 30.0-0-0 12. 29..¥b5 £xh4 20. 6.¥h2 g5 20.¤d6! 21.¦xh1 £xg2+ (Wade/O'Connell)) 31.¥xe4™ dxe4 27.¦a3 ¢c6 35..h6 1-0 Tal.¥f4 £f6 12.h5 £h8 40.0-0 g5 16.axb5 £xb5! 35.¥xc1 ¦c5 34.¢e2? ¦xh1 32.£c1 0-0 31.¦b5!? "Bobby finally realized that he must be lost and thus characteristically goes for active counterplay....¤b5 ¥c7 9.¦c7 £d5 32.c3! ( 13. " ( M e d n i s 7 4 ) ( 27.¢e1 ¥c6 26.h6 g6 15. and probably the best move.¥xc4 ¤f5 21.R-Platz.¤c6!? ] 7.¦a1 ¥xc2 33.£e3™ ¦xb1 31.¦c1 ¥a5 19. (White hits the obviously u n d e f e n d e d g 7 .¦xd3 £c7 29.£d5! "Now we have a rather full blockade and the game could well be called a draw here..£xh4 ¦xe7 36.a4 £a5 9. weil seine Chancen auf dem Konigsflugel liegen. daher die Linienoffnung fur den Th8.M-Koblencs.¤f3 ¤ge7 12.f4² with a solid advantage to White ¤e7 9..£c1 ¦c7 22.¦xb7 £a8 34. White ensures an excellent diagonal for his QB and paralyzes any hopes Black may have for m e a n i n g f u l c o u n t e r p l a y .¥d3 c4 11.¤f3 ¥d7 8...¦fe1 fxe5 15..¦fe1! ".My 160 Memorable Games 15 6.W/Buenos Aires 1960/MainBase/ [ChessBase] (42)] 6.£c7 9. and a very interesting one.¦xa7 ¢b8 34.¦c1 ¥b3 0-1 Fischer.£d7 ( 38.¤xf5 exf5 12.¥a3 d4 18.¢xh1 e2! 33.f5! 23. 7.¥xd3 1-0 Picanol Alamany.¢e2 £f6 21.¦a1 £xg6 0-1 Fischer.¤xg6! hxg6 17..¥h4 a2 41.RUhlmann.. H / B u e n o s A i r e s 1 9 7 2 / E X T 9 9 ( 1 7 ).£e2 ¤xd4 14.¥a3 ( 12.£c7 8..h4 ½-½ Hase.a4! f5 10.¥b4 £c7 17.f3 ¦c8 29.£f2² (Kamyschov)) 13..¥e3 ¥a7 13.£xd4 ¥b6 10.dxe5 h6 16.. or even two pawns in this position .¥f3 g4!! "Black sacrifices a pawn and allows a protected passed pawn to boot.

..¤xf7 'µ' '(eco 74)' 'µ' '(eco 74)' ¦xf7 '!' '!' 16.¦e1 ¦a2 57.¥d3+..¢d2 ¥e4 44...¤g5 ¦f8 15.¥g5 ¦df8 19.¥xd5 exd5 27.¦c5 ¢b8 21.¥xh6 ¤xh6 33..¥e2 ( 13. 13.£h6 ¤g6 18.¦e1 ¢h5 54.¤f3 [ 11.¦c1 ¦h8 31.¥b2 £g4 29.£d3 £xa5 15....¤bc6 12.£xd7+ ¢xd7 27.¤f3 £xa5 13.¦xc3 £e4 22.f5 ¤dxf5 32.¤d6+ ¢f8 15.e7 ¤xe7 39.¥d3 0-0-0© × £h7..¥e2 ¥c8 19.¢f3 ¢d6 45.¦b1 b6 ( 13..£b3 ¦g8 28..£xa5 12.£xg7 ¦g8 10.¤f3 ¦h8 ( 11.L/Santa Fe 1960/MCL (48).£f6 ¦f8 18.¤f3 £c7 12.f4 d2 38.14..¥c4 £a4 25.¦xc2 ¦a4 40..¥b5!? A very sharp and interesting move that was praised by some .¦g5 ½-½ Gligoric.£d6+ ¢a8 30.V/ Perm 1997/EXT 2000 (29)..¦b5 d3 30.¢h2 £xd1 38..£xf7 ¥e8! B1) 17.¦h1 ¦xh2+ 32.¦e2 ¦c4 50.¤g5 ¥d7 17. R / P e r m 1 9 9 7 / E X T 2 0 0 0 ( 3 8 )) 11.¦b3 ¦d2+ 34.£xg8+ ¢e7 12.¦xh2 £g1# ) 31.¤g6 17.¤h7 ¦h8 17..¢e3 ¦xe2+ 33. Keres 69.£xc3+ 9.¦g5+ ¢c4 45. 8.¢e3 a5 43.hxg6 ¥xg6 41.¦dd1 b4 31.¢f2 d4 ) 22.¢h2 £xe5+ 36.£xh7 ¤bc6! This is a big improvement .¦g3 ¥c2 42.¦xb7+ ¢f6 32.¦cc1 c2 37.0-0-0 14.¥b4 1-0 Morozov.J-Blatny..F/Brno 1964/ MCD (39) ) 20.f4 bolsters the centre but shuts in the queen's bishop and weakens the dark squares.¤xf7 ¥b5 18.f3 f5 26.. [ I think the move is both viable and playable.¦b2 ¦c4 41.0-0-0! ) 14.£g7 ¦fg8 17.¢g2 a4 33.f4 ¦d1 38.¢e3 ¢d7 34.£d3 ¦g4© .¦xh2+ 32.¤xd4 ¦xd4 19.¤d6+ ¤xd6 21.¥a3 ¤d8 29.¤d7 '?!' 11. B2) 17...£e1 ¤d5 33. B) 9.¤xd4 £xe5 16.£xh7+.¥xg6 £xh6 19..£xa1 11.¦g3 1-0 Giaccio.£c4 a6 20.g4 ¦g8?! 25. actually .a4 ¤ce7 21.¤e5± (Schwarz 67)) 14.£b1 b5 23.¢xf3 ¦xe6 31..¦d1 ¦c8 28. but current theory seems to prefer 12.£xe7 ¤xf3+ 26.¦d1 £xf4 32.¢g2 ¤d2 24..¥e2 £a4 ( 19.£xf7 ¦df8 16.¤xe5 ¤xe5 14..£xd4± (Schwarz 67)) 13.h3 ¦c4 19.¦e2 ¢e7 44. 12.¥d4 £d8?“ ( 31.£d3 d4 16.¢xe2 £g2+ Schwarz p103#81 (Schwarz).axb4 ¤xb4 34.g3 ) 13.¥h6 ¤bc6 13.¥d3 £xa5 15.G/Budapest 1960/EXT 2001 (33).S-Zvedeniouk.¥g3 ¤f5µ 17.¤g5! ¦f8 13.¥b5+ ¥d7 14.¢f4 ¢e6 35.¦h1 ¦c2 58.£xh7 ¤xe5 15. and c o n d e m n e d b y o t h e r s .¥d7!? 11.¦e1 ¥e8 29.¤h4 b5 30.¥d3 ¤c6 24..0-0 ¤cxe5 20.A/ Leningrad 1952/EXT 99/[ChessBase] (19).¦b1 ¥f5 19.¢g2 ¦e5? ( 29.0-0 ¢c7 21.¤xe6! ¤f3+ 29.. 0-1 Matanovic.¦c1 ¤c4 31.¤f3 £c7 12..£xh8 ¤ce7 ( 10..£xh7 ¥c7 10.¤ce7 13.¥f6 12.¤f6+ ¢d8 18..¤xe5 ¤xe5 21.¤c7+ ¢f8 15. ] 11.¤xa8 e5 16.£f6 ¥f5 19.¦c6 30.¢h1 ¥xe6 29.£d3 ( 15.£xe6 d2 30.¢xf3 fxe6 ) 30.a4 ¦ah8 25.£d7? ( 31.£g5² .h3 £e1+ 35.f4 t i e s B l a c k u p] 12.£e1= ) 28.A-Zamarbide Ibarrea.¦xb7+ ¢c8 34.h3 ¥a8 26.a6 ¦xa6 36.bxa5!? [ 8..¦e3 ¤g6+ 40.AMititelu. [ 10.V-Botvinnik.£d2± (Schwarz 67)..My 160 Memorable Games 16 ¥d8+ 34. I / S e g o v i a 1 9 9 9 / E X T 2 0 0 2 ( 3 4 )) 8.£e5 .. 14.¦c3 ¤xa3 37.¦ec1 ¤xc2 35.£xa5!? 11..¦a1 a5 32.bxa5 ¤c6 12.¦e3 ( 22.DF a k h r e t d i n o v .£d3 £d5µ ] 11.¦ae1 ¦c6 29.¦e5 ¢e7 28..axb7+ ¢b8 15.S-Szabo.h3 ¤fe7? ( ¹25..¤b5 ] 8.£xg7 ¦g8 10.¥xa7 ¤f3+ 23.f4 ( 11...¥xd7+ ¥xd7 14..£h7 0-0-0 22.£c5 20.¥f4 ¤f8 13.¢c1 ¢d3 47.¥f3 £g8 24.¢f2‰ ) 24.¦b3 £d4 21.¥e3 d4 27.¤g5 0-0-0 16.¦e1 ¦dc3 49.¥e7 ¦e8 20.g3 ¤fg6 17.¥g3 ) 17..cxd5+ ¢xd5 37..¦g1 ¦aa3 56.¦h3 ¤cd4+ 30.£h4 £e4 22..£d3 ¦g4 16.¦ab1 ¥c6 ) 21.¦ee3 d4 28...¤xc6 ¤xc6 29.£d3 ¥f6 ( 12. ¦g2? 15..¥g7 0-0-0 14.¦b3 £a1 13.¥f4 ¤bc6? ( 13...cxd3 ¦xd3 33.¢d1 (Panov/Estrin 73)..¤c6? 10.¥f6 g5 22.£a2 d3 26..bxa5 ¤xe5 13.£xa1 10.Y-Khasin.h3 £f4 17.£b3 £f2 33..g3 ¤f5 17.¦b5 £d4 21.£f2 £xc2 23. eco 74/81)) 19.¤d4 25.¦xc2 d3 36. over how this line had been previously played.h4 ¦a4 55.¥xa4?! ( ¹21. 10.¦d3 ¦fg8 25.¦ab1 1-0 Vukcevich.0-0 d4 24.¦fb1 a6?! ( 17. 13.¥e6+ ¢c7 27.¦fe1 d4 25.g3 ¦c4 26.b5! exf4 ( 16.a6 13.¤d6 ¦h7 23..0-0 £a4 16.¦e2 ¢g6 53.¤a6? 14. Keres 69)) 15..£xe4 ¥xe4 25..¥f3 ¤d5 24.¥g5 ¦xh4 0-1 Morozov.hxg4 ¦xg4 24.¤d4 15.. B) 14.£c7 [ 11.¢h5 ¥e8# 0-1 Gutierrez.¦ad1 g4 23.¦a2 ¦e4 52.¥d3± (Pachman 68.¤bc6 13.¦e1 ¢f7 47.dxc3 9.D-Senik..) 11.¢f2 ¤h6 31.¦g1 ¦h2 0-1 Ragozin.¦b3 ¦c4 19..¦b5 £a4 20. 1-0 Kots..£f6 ¥g6 18.¥f4 ( 21..¥f4 ) 12.0-0 d4!? ( 14.f6? 13.M/Moscow 1951/EXT 2001 (58) ) 12.gxf5 exf5 51..¥xd6 ¥d7 22.£xe6+ ¥d7 18.¥d2 £xa3 18.¢f2 ¦cc3 43.¥h7+ ¢h8 21.¦e1 ¦gg4 27.a6 0-0-0! 14.h4 ¥e4 28.¦1xc2 ¤xc2 39..¦b1 ¤f6 19.¦b1 ¥b6 12.¦e2 ( 24.¤b5!? ¥c7 9..¤fd4 ) 26.¥g3 ¦h8 15...£b3 £d4+ 28.£xh7 ¥xe5 11.O-Gonzalez M e n e n d e z .R/ Sombor 1957/MCD (22)) 15.¤cd4! 18..£f3 ¦xg2 24.£c4 15..¢b2 b5 48.£f3 ¦d2!µ ) 18.£xg7 ¦g8 9.£a4!µ (Pachman 68.. a TN...¢xe2 ¥xh1 27.¢e2 £c3 16.¥f4! ¥d7 13.£xg2 23. 31.f4 ¥d7 14.£h6+ ¢g8 20.£h4 ¦g8 22. 10.¦e2 ¦b3 48.¤g5 ¦f8 13.B/Lorca 2003/ E X T 2 0 0 4 ( 1 3 ).¥b5 ( 12. I/Canberra 2001/EXT 2002 (21)] 8.c4 b6 36..¥g5 ¦df8 21.0-0-0! 15.¤h3 ¤g6 14..¦g4 ¢d4 46.¤xd4 ¤xe5? ( 27.0-0 ¦g4 16.£a4 16.¥e2 ¥xc2 ( 18.£d1 ¦c5 20..¥xd7+ £xd7 15.¦c6? 32.£xf6# 1-0 Chow.¤f3 ¤bc6 12.e6 ¤g8 38..¢e3 £h3 .¦xc3 ¦xe2+ 26...¦xe5 28.¥e3 ¤c6 18.¥e3 ¦d3 42..£xd1 ¤f5 0-1 Fichtl.¢h1 £e1+ 37.M-Maric..¥xd2 cxd2 31.¥f2 c2 35.¥xh6 fxg6 20.¤bxd4± (Schwarz 67).¢f2 ¥e4 27.£f2 £e4 23.¥g3+.¢d1 A) 9.h5 ¤f5 29.¦b1 A) 14.¦b8+ ¤xb8 39.g4 ¢e7 46.£xh8 ¢f8 11.¦g8 … ¦g4-a4 ) 22..¤e4 ¥b7 22..bxc6 bxc6 18.

¢h1 ¦h8!µ .£d3!± Tal AND Fischer looked at this position in the post-mortem analysis.¦fb1 ¥c6 ( 17.¦df8!? 17.¢e2? £c4+ 22.. [ 14.¤f3 g5 'Esta derrota forçoume a procurar uma "contestação" ao Gambito do rei que publiquei no American chess Quarterly. and published his analysis in a Soviet magazine shortly after this game was played.¤d6+! £xd6 19.' '='] 4.d3 ¤g3 8.f4 £f6= ] 19.gxf3 6... (A draw...¥xc6? ¥xc6 14.¦h1+! 21.¦h8!? ] 15.GM R.¦xc3+ ¤c6 33.¦xg2? 13..f3 £c6 44.¦ae1? £b8!-+ ) 17..¢xg1 and Black's king remains hemmed in the centre while White merely marches his h-pawn to victory.¥xc7+ ¢xc7 .£h2+ 22.and spent many minutes analyzing this move.£f7 ( 20.¥b5. (Many strong p r o g r a m s a l s o c h o o s e t h i s m o v e ...¦xf1? ¦df8µ ] 17..£xe7= ] 17.' 13.h4 ¤d5 57..¥xb5! I personally think this is the best move here.¥e3 ¥xh4+ 11...¥xd7+ ¢xd7 16.¥xc8 ¦e7 47.£b5+.¢xh3 £xe7 20..¤f6+ ¢d8 11.£xf5 £xf5 27...J..¦a7+ ¢f6 55.¢g1= ] ½-½ C39 Spassky.¥xc6! ¥xc6!? ( 14.¢g1 ¦g8+ 18.£xf3 £f6= '=' 'etc..W 'vence.£xe7 ¦g8 21.£xg8+.¤xd8 Both players now find a series of fine moves in an extremely complex position . 6.. [ ¹14.£xg8+.¢g2 ( 21.. ) [ 15.¥xe7 £xe7 ( 16..£b7+ ¢e8 37.' ( 7..¥b7 ¤d4 50. I (1961) Nr.¢xh2 ¦xe7µ ) 16.¦fe1 ( 17.¥xe7? ¤xf3+ 16.a6! bxa6 31.A/Zuerich 1959/MCL/[Bulletin] (61)] 12.Boris Vasily Fischer... ] After thinking for more than half an hour." . Vol.¥d6 seria também satisfatório.¦a3 ¤c6 49.£e5 f6! 12.f4 ¥h6 'e as brancas ficariam mais que compensadas pela perda do peão..¤xe5 ( 16. [ 13.¥xa6+ ¢d7 36.¤f4! £xf4? 22.¢xg2 ¥h3+ 19..¢h1 £xh2+! 18.¦xe1 ¦xh7 19. W' ) 9. But then he decided that it did not appeal to him.¥xb5?! 20.¢h1! The last few moves are all best and/or forced.. 31.¢f1!² ¦g8 14. 14.0-0 ( 5.£h4+ 24.My 160 Memorable Games 17 … 34.£xe7 ¦xe6 22..) [ 17. Fischer finally decides do give up the e5 pawn.¢f3™ £h3+ 23.¤g5+. And he said he had 'under-estimated' the strength of Tal's reply..¦g1! ¦xg1+ 15.£xc6 15.. its content and entertainment value more than makes up for it.' [ 4.¤xc6 15.¢f1 ¦h1# ) 21.. O lance correto seria 3. d6!' [ 3..¥xd8 ¢xd8 ( 19.¥f5± ) 32. [ 21.¦g6 21.h5 6....¦e3!± ] 16. 39.£xf7 d4 ( 15. Steinitz.¢g1 £g4+ 24.¥xd7 ¢xd7 21.¤xf6+ ¢f7-+ Steinitz.£g4+ 22....¢f2 ¤d1+ 53. [ 15.) This line is not without risk for Tal. (Black is understandably nervous about his King being in the center.¤g5 ) 16.£c8+ ¤d8 ( 37.£xe5 16.) 14.¦g1 £h8 29..W' 'Steinitz..] 20.¢xe3 ¦xa1-+ ) 23...£f3± ] 21.£e2+ ( 9.£e7 10.¥g5 ¥e7 10.¥d3 ¦c8 56.¦xg5! 18.¤e5 £h4+ 6.¥g5 d4 16....¥xd7+ ¦xd7 16.£xe7 ¦xg2+ 18.¢d2 ¥g5 12.16.Robert James Mar del Plata 1960 1.. at least until White tires of the sport and agrees to split the point! This is certainly one of the better and more interesting draws I have ever studied.¦xa4 £d5+ ( 33.¥g5± and White consolidates..¥xe7 ¤xf3+ 17.d6! Fischer ] 4.¥c5+ ¢f6 39.¦xe5 ¦xe7µ ] 15.) 38.¤xc7!? ¦xh7µ ) 20.£xe5? 17.0-0 [ 13. and wins easily.¥xf4 ¤xh1 9..¤e5 ¤f6 [ 5.¥a4 ) 18.¥g5!? Bobby played this. Fischer.£xe5 17.¦xf1 £xe6= [ 20.¦xa4 ¤xc2 51.d4 [ 6.¤g5 £xe5 16.exd5 ¥g7 'é a moderna panacéia.¢h2 £e5+ 41..¥e4 ±..WDueckstein.¦e1 -.¢b8 17..¦d3 £e5+ 39.0-0-0!? This is an obvious and also a very logical move.¥xe7 ¢xe7 48.gxf3 ¥e7 10..¥f6! ) 20. o velho 7..¤d3 f3 9. believing it gave him an advantage.¦fe1 ) 17..¢g2 £e4+ 43..¢xg2 d4 17.¤xe5 £xe5 15.£e5! [ 19.h7 ¦h8 61. (After the game.¥g5 -.) 34..¥c4 g4 5. And while it is short and far from being perfect.¤xf7 [ 16.¤xe5! Tal saw this ....¤xe5! Setting off a dazzling array of fireworks! I thought Tal was simply trying to confuse the issue.. 1. 13.g4 5.¦g4 ¢b8 30.£e3 £xe3+ 26.¥d6 ).¢g1 £e1+ 42...¥xe7 ¦h8! 18.¢g3 bxa4 35..¥d6 .h4 'Única tentativa efetiva para obter alguma vantagem.¦d3 ¦e2+ 45.¢e2? £g4+ 24.¦fe1 ] 16..¥xe7 ¦h8 17..bxa4 34.£e2 h5 11.¢xf1?! ¦xh2! 20.. [ 12.¤d5? 32.17.¥d7! Tal fully deserves an exclam for passing up Bobby's (prepared) trap .¢f1 £xc8 46...£e6+ ¢c7 23..0-0 d4! 15.¢h1 £f3+ 25.¥e4 ¤e3+ 52.h4! .¢f3 ¦h3+ 23..¤xe5 This is virtually forced. 15.¢f4 ( 23.¥c4 ¦h7 7.) 17.¢d6 ¤f5+ 26.¤xg4 ¤xe4 7.¥xf1! [ 16.¦ae1 ¦xh7 19.e4 e5 2. (Petrosian first recognized the value of this move..W' 'Steinitz.f3!± ] 14...¢f1 ¤c6 '!' ) 5.£xh2 ¤xh2 19.¢g3 ¤c3 54.¢g2 £g4+ 24.£f3 £xe6+ 25.¥c4 d5 7.¢xg2 £g4+ Black can check on g4 and f3 for as long as he likes ..g5+ ¢e6 58.¥xa6+ ¢d7 35.¢e5 £e4+ 25.h4 ) 15.¥c4 1-0 Unzicker.) They BOTH came to the conclusion that White was better in this position!! £e4? 17. Literally over a DOZEN GM's have given this move an exclamation mark.£xf7+ ¢d7µ ] 13.h5 ¦c1 59.¢e7 38.£c4 20. he must be prepared to gambit one (f7) or even two pawns in this line...¥c5! … 39..¤c3N ] 6.£f8+ ¦e8 23. [ 19.f4 exf4 3.nasty things happen to the second player if he grabs the g2-Pawn..d4 d6 8.¢g2 £d5+ 40..¦xg2+?! 16..] 14.£xe6+ ¥d7 ( 16.¤xe6! ¦xg2+! 19..£xe4 dxe4 18.. that eventually leads to the correct result.¢h1™ £f3+ 23.£xe1+ 18.¦xh1 £f6 28.h6 ¦c8 60. 7.

alheio ao perigo.0-0 ¤c6 [ 12..0-0!? Keres. 22.' ] 1-0 B87 Fischer.. mas pouco imaginava que em quatro rápidos lances o jogo das pretas se arruinasse.£xf2 ¥c5! 29.¦fc8 19..¦xd4 ¦xg5= '=' '=' ) 27.¥xf6 ¥xf6 16...'é muito eficiente.Bg2 .£e7?! 12.¦xf6! gxf6 17.¢h1 £xd1 14..¤f3 d6 3.¥xd6 ¦f6 18.PAnderssen..¦f4 'As pretas abandonam.f6 ¥xf6 22.d5 19.¦e4 £d1+= '=' 'etc.e5? dxe5 12.£g4 f5 'Ganhando o segundo peão mas enfraquecendo o l a d o d o r e i .¦e5! '#Incrível.£d6!+.03.P sugere primeiro 10.£g3 dxc3 17.¥xf4 ¥g7 '#' 9.£e4 £h4 'Sabia que ia perder uma peça. B 24..f5 '!' '!' [ 11...A Paris 1858' 'Morphy.¤a4 e5! ) 12.¤xe7+ Black resigns..exf7+ ¢e7 ( 13. e6. >< g6.£xe5+ ¦g7! 'Agora o Ph4 das brancas deve cair...¥xd6 £xe2+ 13. ' [ 27.¥a3+ ) 16.¢h1? [ 18...¥g3³ 'equilibra.¦ad1 [ 18.' [ Keres.£xf5 £xh4+ 23..¥xb2 d5 ( 15.£b8+ ¦g8 30....¥e3 £b7 16.¥e5+! 'impedindo as p r e t a s d e d o b r a r e m t o r r e s n a c o l u n a g ' ¢g8 ( 21.... ' [ 15.cxd4 12.Bg2 .¦xf4+ 15.£xh4?! 13. 14.c3 £f6 ] 11.¤c3 a6 6.c3! A) 9.¥g5 'T' '!' £b6+ 14. P-Anderssen.Re5) 'Deixando de ver a verdadeira ameaça das brancas..fxe6! ( 12.¦xg3µ /\ Rxc3 'ameaçando .¥xc6 ¦xc6 18..¥d6= '=' '=' ] 27....¥f6 28...£e7! Fischer.£d5+ ] 1-0 .£f4? ¦g4-+ ] 22...¦e1 £g4 27.Re5)' 'Fischer:'Overlooking White's real threat. 11.¦xa4 ] 22.¢h8 .b4!? 12. Outposts The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 345 Sicilian Defence..¥xd6 ¦fe8 e se 19. 27.¦f1 ] 21.£d7 18.¢h1 0-0 15. Mais efetivo seria 15.¢h8 >= .¤e5? ¦xf2 28.¢d7 14..¥xd6 >= ¦f6 ( 18.¤xc6 ¥xc6 '# ' 11.¥g2? K e r e s : " w i t h a d v a n t a g e f o r W h i t e .¤f7+ ) 22.e5! dxe5 17.£xg4 ( 24..£e2 ¥f5³ 'No mínimo as brancas conservam algum controle sobre seu f4.¤d3 ¤xe4 8.. Pc2 e as brancas com um peão a menos enfretariam um duro final.' ¦f8? Fischer:'Overloo king White's real threat.' '?' 22.¥g5 f6 14.0-0 ¥b7 9..' (27.¤xe4 16.Re5)' [ 26..¦g8 19.£d1+ '=' 26. mas não podia acreditar nisso.d6 7. e6.£h2 ¦g4 21..¦xf5 ' Q u e m a i s ? ' [ 22.¤xe5 ¦xh4 23.bxc3 13.£b6+ 15....¥xg4 0-0 14.£d2!© /\ 15.¦g8 [ 18.a4 ¦b8? 23.¥e2 [ 11.¦f4 d5 17.' '/\ Rxc3' '/\ Rxc3'] 24.¤d5 £d4! 19...¤xe4 ¦xe4+ 12.¤xd4 ¤f6 5..£g3! > = .£xc3 ¤xe4 16.R 10.. Morphy. conforme indicou Spassky em nossa análise posterior.¢h8 >= ] 16.£h3 ) 15..£e1! cxb2 ( 14. 12. 14..¥d4 20..¥f4 ¦g6ƒ ] 17.Robert James Gadia.gxf4 ¥xf4µ .¥c4 e6 7.R/ Mar del Plata 1960/MCL/[ChessBase] (29)' [ 29.¤c6 ) 23...g3÷ ] 13.bxc3 c5! 'Atacando imediatamente o centro das brancas.¤c5 £f7µ Kmoch.£h4 28..¢f2 £f6 13.. Estava preocupado com Ne5 sem imaginar que poderia neutralizá-lo com . " ( 14.f6 [ 21.¦f4? ¥d6-+ . >< g6.¢h2 ¦c6 '=' 29.¤d5 £d8 20.. >< g6. pensei que as pretas pudessem montar um ataque ao longo da c o l u n a g ..h6 ] 13. h5'.¦xd1 ¤g4 ] 11..¥e5+ ¤xe5 21.¥xc8 ¦xc8 15..£e2+ ¥e6! ( 11..¦e4 £g5 'Principiei a sentir desconforto. B) 9.My 160 Memorable Games 18 12.¤d2 ¦e8 11...¥a3+ ] 12.£d4! ¥e7 14.¥b3 b5 8.¥c1 /\ Nf4.0-0 'Keres.£xd4 exd4 ] 18.¦xe7+.1960 Simple Chess by Michael Stean 2.' (27..fxe5 ¥c5+ 13.Olicio Mar del Plata 31..£e2 ¥d6 ) 24.£f2 ¥d6‚ ) 24. confundi-me e perdi a partida!' [ 27....¦d8 'Tentando escapar! Mas a dama não têm cobertura..P-Anderssen..PAnderssen.'] 9..¦xf8++. S p a s s k y .¢g1 £g4 'força uma troca favorável de damas' 24.¥e5 ¤xe5 20..fxe6 fxe6 13.' [ 9.' 'Fischer:'Overlooking White's real threat.£c7 15. ' [ 23.Bg2 ) 14.¥f8! 27.' '=' ( 27. 22..e4 c5 2.¤xc3 10. Enquanto tentava imaginar o pensamento de Spassky.£xh4+ '/\ Bh4' 23.¤xe7 ¥xe7-+ Morphy..¤d5+ ¢d8 13..a4 bxa4 ( 22.£d4! 'Esta poderosa centralização paralisa completamente as pretas.¤e5 ¥c5 28. pelo que possa valer.¦xg4µ ..c3 ¥e7 21. 27.A Paris 1858' 'Morphy. e6.¥d5 '!' '!' ¦ac8 17.£d2!N /\ 15.e5 [ 11..¥xe5 22..¦xe4+ dxe4 18... o lado do rei das pretas fica todo desordenado.¥xd6 ¥f8! 'A chave!' [ 19..¦ae1 [ 17...¦xf6?! gxf6 23. h5 'seguido de Nf4.¦f4 £g3 30.¥xe2 cxd4 14.. Tive de efetuar mais um lance para convencerme!' 29. Rxd3 seguido de .£d3 ¥e7 [ 12.¤xe5 'com pouca possibilidade de jogo para as brancas. 14.¢g1 '#' £g4? 'À deriva.'] 20.. mas as pretas perdem uma peça.£xg3 ( 24.¤c3µ 'Após esse lance. h5' '/\ Nf4.¥d2 ¥xa1 14.¤c5 ] 19....' '1-0 Spassky.. for: £xe7 24.£xc3 .£g6 28.¤e5 ) 19..£d1+ 28.' '/\ Nf4.h5 13.£e5+ ¦g7= '=' '=' )] 26.¤xg5 ¥xd4 30. Bc5.a5 ¦6b7 25.e5 ) 14.£xa7 ( 27.¦b8 23.] 28.¤b4 ¦cb6 24.' [ 25..H and Antoshin ] 18. as brancas ficam sem compensação pelo peão.£xc5 £xg2# '#' ] 27.¦f2 ¥e7 /\ Bh4 'Ameaçando B h 4 ' ' / \ B h 4 ' 25.¢h8 [ 17.d4 cxd4 4...g3 ¥h6 14. ' (27.¥f8 22..P 10... B-Fischer.A Paris 1858 'devendo as pretas vencer.£d7 12..0-0! -> ) 12..¦a1! [ 21.f4 ¤c6 10.d5? ¥xc3+-+ 13.A Paris 1858'] 6.. Sozin Attack 1.'] 18..£d2!© /\ 15.¦xe7+...¤xe7+ [ 23.P' ] 11.¥g5 T .¤f7+ ¢g8 29. 15.

¤c2 d5 10.¤g5 ¦e7= Reshevsky.¦e6 ¤a6 52..d4 cxd4 4.¦f7 46.¥f5 ¦f6 42. 14.f4 fechando o centro e planejando um ataque a ala do rei com g5g4' 11.exf5 'Trocando imediatamente Reshevsky evita que Fischer avance na ala da dama' [ 11. F-Fischer.bxc3 ¦xe5+ 32..¦f6 ¤xb3 36.g4 a5 39..My 160 Memorable Games 19 E98 B54 Lombardy..¦e1 >= '>=' ] 14.£e8 15.f3 f4 /\ g6-g5 -> >> '/\ g6-g5 -> >> Iniciaria uma tipica luta da India do Rei onde as negras atacam na ala do rei e as brancas na ala da dama'.¥b7 ¦b8 33.c5 g5 as negras atacam com tudo na ala do rei enquanto as brancas tem que se defender e ao mesmo tempo buscar uma reacao na ala da dama pois dificilmente conseguem exito com uma defesa passiva] 11.08.¢e2 ¢f7 27.c4 ¤f6 6.¥f3 ¦a5 64.R Leipzig ol 1960 'Letelier.R-Fischer.g5 19..exd5 b5 20.b3 a6 14.£b5 ¥d7 14.fxe4 cedendo a casa e4 as brancas ou jogar .a3 /\ b2-b4 '/\ b2-b4' a4! ] 18.¥g6+ ¢g7 55.¦e4 ¤d5 60.bxa5 bxa5 40.¦c4 ¦e5 65.¢d2 ¦xe1 33.¥e2 ¥g7 9..¢f3 ¦b3+ 75.¥d2 ¦c8 21..¢xa4 ¢d4 43.¦g1 ¦c4 30.R (9) Los Angeles 1961 '=' 'Reshevsky.¥d5 ¦d7 47..F-Fischer.¢f2 ¤f4 59.¢e3 ¦c8 29.¥b5+.¥d3 ¥d7 16. .¢c2 g5 37. Reshevsky Sicilian Defence 1.¥g5? 'Este lance nao resolve muito ja que para atacar as negras vao avancar os peoes g e h e somente entao a dama chegara a ala do rei para apoiar o avanco destes peoes' [ 14.] 45.¦c6+ ¢f7 ½-½ Reshevsky.¥e3 ¦e8 9..¤b4 ¥a5 24.f3 ¤d4 [ 12.1961 1.¥h5 ¦a7 49.¦ac1 ¦fc8 13. as brancas devem deter o avanCo negro ao mesmo tempo que contra-atacam na ala da dama usando a ruptura c5.¢a3 ¢xc3 42.¤e7 9.¦g4+ ¢h8 50.¥d2 £b6 24.¢g3 ¦e6 66.¢f2 ¦b4 76.Robert James Reshevsky.¥e3 0-0 10.axb4 ¦d5 26.cxd5 exd5 11.¥e3 0-0 9.¢g4 ¦b4 79.¦e1 ¤xe2+ 17.f5..R Zuerich 1959'] 7.dxe5 ( 9.¢h2 ¢g7 44.¤xb4 £xc1+ 16.¤xd4 g6 5.¤f3 d6 3..¥d2 a5 16.¦d6 ¤c5 54.f5 gxf5 35.c4 ¤f6 2.gxf5 que dominaria a casa e4 e abriria a coluna 'g' para o ataque.' 10.¥f5 ¦a6 56.£xd8 ¤xd8 11.¥e4 ¢f7 71..h5 b6 36.RFischer..¦xc4 ¤d7 23.¦c7 ¤a6 39.¦e4 ¢g7 51.¥xa6 ¦a8 31..SFischer.William Fischer.d6 6.¦g4+ ¢f6 61.F i s c h e r .£xd4 d6 8.¦g6+ ¢h7 53..¥e6 ¦d6 41. Horowitz Fischer vs. 11.¢e3 ¦b3+ 77...¥e2 [ 5.h6 f4 38.¤c6 8.¦d7 ¤xc3 29.a3 'Reshevsky corretamente busca contrajogo na ala da dama' £g6 20..¥e4? [ ¹45.£xd5 £c7 13. A.¦c1 ¤b4 15..¢h5 ¦b5+ 73.h3 ¥c6 17.¥d3 h6 43.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦xf5 ¢h8 37.d5 [ 8.g3 ¥xf1 19.e5 Letelier. As negras vao combater o centro das brancas com .¦c7 ¢f6 72.e4 c5 2.¤xf5 [ 11. S .¦c7+! ¦f7 46.e4 0-0 'Nao ha necessidade de jogar .¦c4 ¦b6 70.R (9) Los Angeles 1961'] 8.£xb6 ¤xb6 26.0-0 £a5 12..Cxf5 deixando que as brancas dominem a casa e4(casa ideal para um cavalo) ou .d5 ¤d4!= '=!' ) 9..¤f6 Gligoric.f3 f4 13.R B l e d 1 9 6 1 ' G l i g o r i c .¥b1 bxc4 22.¥xc3 ¤xd5 28.¤c3 ¤xd4 7.£xe2 h6 18..f4! e4 13.£d2 ¥e6 11.0-0 [ 7.¦c4 ¦d8 40.d4 g6 3.Robert James New York ch-US 1960 1.S-Fischer.¤f3 e5 7.¤e1 ¤d7 'A estrutur a de peoes desta posicao eh tematica na India do Rei.¤d3 f5 'Aqui comeca uma interessante luta estrategica.¥d2 >= '>=' .¦e5 ¦a3+ 58.¤xd5 ¤xd5 12.. by I.¤c3 ¥e7 8.¢xe1 ¢d5 34.R Leipzig ol 1960'] 5.¢d2 ¢c4 35.¦d6 ¤xa2 32.bxa5? 'este lance dificulta a futura ruptura c5..¦xc8+ ¦xc8 25.h4 ¢e6 28.SFischer.c4 e6 7.£f2 ¤d7 18.d4 cxd4 4.h4 ¦b5 69.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦c7 ¢f6 67.a3 ¥xb4 25..¥f3 ¦f7 48..¤e4 'as brancas uem a casa e4 enquanto as negras tem a coluna 'f' semi-aberta possibilitando u m a p r e s s a o n a a l a d o r e i ' b6 14.¦xf7 ¤c5 38.¢f4 ¤g6+ 78. Caso as brancas troquem exf5.d6 como d e m o n s t r a a l i n h a a s e g u i r ' 5.R Zürich 1959 'Olafsson.¢g4 ¦e5 68.¤d5 ¥h4+ 18.¤c3 ¥g7 4.gxf5 12.Samuel Herman New York/Los Angeles m 1961 All About Chess.. Ja as negras podem trocar .¦xe7 ¥c3 27.b4 ¤f6 21.¥c3 f5 22.¢b4 ¢e3 0-1 B36 Fischer..¥e4 ¤e7 62.¥e3 as brancas tem o plano Rh1 seguido de g4 para minar o centro das negras ] 12..¥d3 d5 30. as negras podem jogar .¤d5 ¥xd5 19.Samuel Herman Fischer.f4 ¥g4 15.¦d5 ¤e6 57.¢g4 ¦b4 74.¢b2 a4 41.¥d2 ¤f6 12.¥xd5 ¤c1 34.¤b5 ¤e6 12.¢xf1 ¥d8 20.e4 c5 2.¦e1 ¦xc3+ 31.¦xf7+ ¢xf7 47..¢g3 ¤b8 45.¥xc1 ¥xb5 17.¤f2 ¤f6 14...¦f4+ ¢g7 63.¦fe1 ¤c5 21. Os peoes e4 branco e f5 negro tem papel principal nas definicoes estrategicas.b3 [ 18.e5 ¦c5 23.d5 Olafsson.Robert James New York/Los Angeles m 10.f3 ¤c6 6.dxe5 10. R B l e d 1 9 6 1 '] 13.

T-Tal. 26..¤b5 ¤f5 19.¥c7! ¦xe4 40.¤xc8! 'Gligoric tinha 23.g3 'Impede ...¥c7! ¦h1+ 59.¢g1 ¢h3 61.g4! [ 21.¥f5 26.. D) 55...e4 40.¤xc5 £xc5 29.c5± ] 18.exf5 ¤xf5 ><e4 .¢f3? [ 53. Kf5'.¦xb7 £d4™ 31.¥e3 f4 12..¢f3 ¦g8 66.¥f4 ( 58.¥xa5 ¦f4? [ 38.¢f2 ¢h2 64..¢h1 ¤xg3+ 23.f4 ¥f5µ ] 22...¤d3 f5 11.¢g2 [ 22.Cd2 da partida anterior.¢g2 [ 51....¤xf6+ ¥xf6 23.L 54..S/Bled/1961/] 17...f4 e4 13.¦e5+ ¢f6 56.¤df2 £e7= Petrosian.¦d5 ¦b3+ 57.f4 exf4 12.¤xe4 >= '>=' £xg3 29.f3 'Comeca a luta estrategica as brancas tem a casa forte e4 e as negras a coluna 'f' aberta' ¤f6 [ 12..¢h1 ¤xg3+ 23.¥b6 ¦d2-+ .. B d 4 ? 2 4 .¥d4+ ¢e6 57.¤b6-+ 'as brancas ganham..¢f2 ¦f3+!! 74. Cxg6 Dxd6 24..g3 ¤f4 26.¤fe4 'O Ce4 pode apoiar o avanco tematico c4 como bloqueia o peao e5 evitando que este avance dando jogo aoBg7' ¤h5?! [ 14.09.¤xc5 '=!' [ 28.¦b1ƒ /\ d5-d6 ] 27.Tab1 que lhe daria no minimo a igualdade.¢e4 ¢f6! 56.S-Fischer.¤f3 0-0 6..c5! ¥xc5 28.¦a8 ¦b3 38.1961 1.¦xe3+ Evans.¢e4 ¢f6 58..¢h3 ¦g5 46..¢f2 h2 70.hxg3 ¤d3 30.¦e6+ ¢f5 55.S-Fischer.¤xg3! 23.hxg3? '??' £h3# ...¤xe4 ¥e5+-+ ] 39..¦c2! e4 45.¥xe5 ¦gxg2+ 45.f4 ] 20.b4! 'Gligoric teve uma genial ideia baseado no ataque a descoberta Dd3-Dxg6' £xb4 [ 26.¢g2 ¦c1 60...¢f4 ¦a5! 56.¦f7 27.¥a5 ¦dg3-+ ] 43.L 'Segundo Evans.Robert James Bled 03.¤f2 /\g2-g4 ] 12.¤xa8? £xh2+ 26..¤xd5 24..¦e2= '=' ] 46.¦c6+= '=' ] 44.¥d2 ¦f5+ 57..¤g3 ¦d3 ) 39.¥f4 ¦f7 47.¤df2 ¤h5 23.¢f2 ( 67.¦d2 44.g4 ¤d4 16. com a mesma id->ia de pressionar a ala da dama das negras' ¤d7 [ 9.¤xc8 ¥xa1 23.Cf5' h6 [ 16.f5 11.g4 das negras' [ 21.¢f3 h3 69.¥d6 ¦b2 57.¤b5! ¤xb5 18.¥e2 e5 7.c4 g6 3..¦d2! 43.£xe4! 29.¥xd4 'O cavalo negro defendia b5.a5 ¦d3 [ 45.axb6? gxf3 23.¢f4 ¦a4 58..Svetozar Fischer.h4 68. 23.cxb5± Tal.¢h1 ¤h3!‚ ] 25..c5! ] 15..S-Fischer. 28..¥f4 ¦d3+ 47.¤xg3 £xd6© ] 23.¦g4! 63..gxf5 'Levaria a outro tipo de plano como explicado nos Conceitos Gerais' 12.¤f2 ¤d4 14.¥xe5 ¦gxg2+ 45.£xf3 ¤xe4 24..¥xf4 fxe4 13..g4 ¥f8 35. na partida Fischer cometeu algumas imprecisoes permitindo que Reshevsky conseguisse o empate.¥c7 ¢f5 57.¥e5? 20.. D x d 4 ' ¥d4+? 24..¦xe4? 'Reshevsky erra e permite que as negras tenham vantagem' [ 28.. C) 55.¢g4 '1/2-1/2 Reshevsky.Dh2+' 25.¦a5-+ /\ Ra4+.£xd3 [ 21.¤xg3 £xd6© ] 22..¢h2 ( 47..£c2 ¥h3÷ ] 21.¥f2 g5‚ ] 10.¤xe4 ¤f5 14.cxd6 cxd6 33..d5 ¤e7 9.... Evans...¢f2 ¦a2+ 72.¦c8 ¦b6 37..¤xe2+ 18.¦e3! 39..¥e3+ ¢f1-+ .¥f4 ¦b3+ 58..¢h2 ¢h7 36. /\ c7-c5 16.¦f6 ¢g7 ) 47.£g3 [ 27.£xf3 ¤h5 [ 23.¢f1 ¦a3! 73.d4 ¤f6 2.£xh6+ ¢g8 31..¢h1+.¦xd6 ¦g7? [ 42.¥e5 ¢h1 65.¢e3? ¢g5 ) 58.¦b7 [ 53.M/Bled/1961/] 10.R (11)/Los Angeles m/ 1961/ ] 13.M-Gligoric.£xd4 ] 22. 23.cxd6 cxd6 31. B) 55.R/Bled 1961/Lapertosa (33)' ½-½ . L as negras tem vantagem devido a qualidade a mais e a melhor estrutura de peoes...g3 ¦f7 /\ Raf8 -> '/\ Raf8 ->'] 26.£xe4 ¥f5-+ .cxb4 '?' 27.¥c7 ( 62.¥f4? h4 ) 62.¦e2 ¢g6 51.¢xf1 £g1# ] 25.¦c7+= '=' ] 48..¢h3!= '=!' ] 53.£xg6+ ¢h8 30.bxc5 ¥xc5 28.c5? 17.g3 ¤xd5-+ ] 27.¦e1 ¦a3 50.¦h5+ 48.g3 e3 48..¤df2 [ 22. mas decide entregar a qualidade baseando-se em profundos conceitostaticos' [ 23.¦e7 49..¦b1 £a5 28.£g3 ] 24.¥xe3 h5 55.¤df2 >= '>=' ¤h5µ ] 21.¥f4 ¦e7 47..¦e8 ¥g7 41.¤d4= Reshevsky.¥d4+ [ 21.' ¦f7 34.¢g2 ¢g4 59..£xb6 26. 22.c5 'Fischer armou um forte ataque na ala do rei e mais uma vez Reshevsky achou o antidoto correto buscando jogo na ala da dama para desviar as forcas negras d o a t a q u e ' [ 26..¢xf3 ¢g1 75.0-0 ¤c6 8.¥xe3 h5 A) 55.¥g5 £d7 >< d6....¤xf1 24..¦c7+ ¢g6 50.¤b6! £c7! 'ameacando ..¦ac1 [ 25.¤xg3 £xd6 24.¥f4 ¦b1 58..¥xd3 ¥d4+ 22.¥f4 ¦f8 67.¥xa3 ¦d2-+ ] 51...£e6+ ¢h8 33.. por ex.£xg6+ ¥g7 30.¥f4! ¦b1 61..¥xb2 '?' 22.¦a2+ 53.f3 f5 11.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¥d2 a6 ] 18.¤f4 27.¦xe3 [ 52.¦f6 ¦xg4 42.¤c3 ( 39.¢h1 ¤xg3+ 31...¥xf4? exf4 ] 28.¤e1 'No lugar de 9.g4? h4-+ ] 54..¥f4 ¦a1 56.¦c1 [ 48..¢h3! ¦xe3 54.¥xe3= '=' ] 52..£g6 '1/2-1/2 Gligoric.e3 46. ><d4 [ 11.¦d7+ ¢g6 44.e4 d6 5.gxf3 23..¢g2 ¦xf4 49.¥g5 ¤f6 15.£xe2 g5 19.£xc5 29.¤bxd6 d3! 'Fischer precisa dar jogo ao Bg7 e antes as brancas bloqueiem d4 e l e a b r e a d i a g o n a l p a r a o B i s p o ' 21.¦xd5 [ 43..¢f1 ¦a8 71.¤xe4 ¤e2+ 30.a4 -+ / -/+.¢g2 ¦dxd5 49.exd4 19..¥e3 c5! [ 17. eliminando este cavalo Gligoric vai pressionar o peao atrasadod6' [ 18. 23... Gligoric decide levar o Cavalo a d3.¢h3 ¦g5-+ ] 43.¥d6 ¦b2+ 60..¥xe4! 28.¢h4? ¦d4 48..bxa5 22.R/Los Angeles 1961/Lapertosa (57)' ½-½ E98 Gligoric. Kf5 '/\ Ra4+.¤b5 a6 [ 19.¥e5 ¦b4! 62.¥d3 ¦f4 32.c5„ ] 22.£e3 bxa5 25.¥d6? ¦d7! 52....¤d3 [ 10.¢e3 ¢g2 ) 67.¤e8 10..¦xf8 ¦d3 41.¦c6! [ 43.. 43.¦xb7 ¦f7 ] 28.hxg3 ¦a6! 'defendendo o peao d6' 32.¥xe1ƒ 'as brancas teriam chances de empate devido ao reduzido numero de peoes'.¥f4 ¢f5 56.My 160 Memorable Games 20 era melhor prevenir o lance .¦c6 ¤xe1 32.¢e3 ¢f5-+ .¢xg3? £h3# .¦xf1 [ 25.¦xa5 52.

¤xa1 £c6 18.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.¤xc4 ¤xb2 21. 1.e5?? Curacao ct 1962 45.¤e2 d6 3.¦b7 ¦c3 39.¦e8+ ¢f6 53.bxc3 f6 Black has an easy game...¢f3 [The second point is 47.¦xc6 ¢f7 14.¦f2 axb5 28.¦xa7 ¦g5 39.¥e2 c5 7.0-0 e6= ] 4.¦fxe1 Fischer.¥d3 ¤c6 0-1 10..¥g5 £xb2 23.¢f3 ¦f5+ 44.e4 d6 2.¦fb1 ¦c7 23.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¤d6 [ 19.h3 22..¥e4 draws easier..¦a8 e4+ 61..0-0 £xc5+ 9.¥d3! ¥xa2 28.¦xe6+ ¢xg5 and Black has a theoretical win.Viktor Lvo Candidates' tournament .¢e4 ¦xg5 46.e5 h6 6..¦fxf7 [ 35. The 'Russians' took care of the optimistic Bobby.¦xb7 bxc4 32.¥b7 ¥xb7 37.fxg6 played more prudently.¥xc4 b5 20. Fischer was their ¦g5 30.f4 0-0 p r o t e c t w e a k p a w n s .£e1 ¥d7 17.¦g1 a4 2. Matters would be different in hot 0-1 Willemstad.dxc5 51.bxc3 ¤e4 31.a4 ¤xa4! 19..¤xa7 ¦c4 36.¥d3 ¦ac8 Geller.¦c7+ ¢g6 34.] 44.¥g2 dxe4 ¦g1! 47.¦xe5 ¦e1+ 49.cxd4 £b6? Fischer.¤xd6 ¥xb5 20.¦e8 ¢g4 68...g4?! [More prudent is 34.¢d4 ¢f6 65.¦ae8 22...¢e3 ¢g3 tournament..Robert James 8.¤f3 0-0 6. B20 [ Fischer misses the brilliant escape 42.¦b2 ¢b8 40.¤xa8 ¦xa8 22.£f3 Slow strangulation was his speciality.¢f4 ¢h5-+ ] 47.¦f2 Geller.¦xc4 ¢f7 34.. A great success became e6 24.¦xa4 ¤c4 33.. Bobby complained: "The Russians have fixed 33.¦e8 ¢f6 51.¦xg7+ ) 45.¦d2 17.¤xd4 ¥d5 Fischer has to 5. 16.dxc5 £a5 Fischer.f5 £c4 19.¤d2 a5 11.d4 cxd4 4.¤xb5 ¥a6 29.¥e3 ¤xd4 10.¦e8 1.g3 g6 [ 3.¢f3 ¦e6 1962 60.¦d1 ¤g6 14.¢e3 g5 62.a4 Petrosian..¥c8 ¢f7 30.¦xa7 ¦xb2 22.¢xd6 36.. Kiev 1960).¦e1 ¦a5! 66.f4 fxe5 13.£xd8 ¦xd8 16.Robert James dxc4 19. but he 21.Tigran ¤b4 12..¤a3² ) 7.¦fxf7 quickly drew among each others.¤c3 g6 C12 4.. Stockholm 1962).¤b3 £b6 Was the next move an 1962 oversight or a provocation? 13.e5! 45.¤xd4 ¤f6 ¥c6 25. 38.¥g2 ¥g7 48.¢e4 ¦f7! ( 44.] 19.0-0 [ ¹5.Efim P 21.hxg5+ ¢g6 41.¥xe4 ¤f6 6.h3 gxf5 27..f5 d5 (Zurakhov-Savon.¥xg4 ¤xg4 15.c4 h6 25.d4 d5 3.¦g4 £b3 32.b4 ¦xd4 30.0-0 ¥c5! [Geller diverts from 13..a6 ¦g4 32.¢h2!! ¦e5 Keres.¤b5 ¦c5 42. He participated in many fxg6 ] 21.¢f5 ¦xe5+ 50.c4! £xe1 18.¤e7+ ¢h8 29..¦a6+ ¢f7 59.d5!? 4.¦a6 ¦xd3 32.¦xa7 ¤c6 31.¥xd4 b5 11.¥xc5 ¤xc5 15.¥a5?! 0-0! 9.fxe5 escapes in 27.£xd8+ ¤xd8 9.¦e8+ ¢d5 55.¦e5 43.e4 c5 2.¥d2 ¥xc3 7. Nimzowitsch had a great influence on him.g5+ hxg5 40.¤c3 ¤f6 4.¦b6 24..¤d5?! [Little better is 21.¦xa2 ¤d7 13.e5 dxe5 12.My 160 Memorable Games 21 B09 ¢g5 50.¦f4! 28.£xg4 ¤xc2 A great prophylactic player was Tigran Petrosian.¦e7 ] 27.¥xc4 20.¢f2 ¦d5 41.¥a6 ¦b4 22.¤e4 in Fischer-Olafsson.¦f1 £h6 26.¥xe7 ¥e5 candidates' tournaments.¦c7+ ¢f6 37.¥g5 ¥b4!? 5. 1.¦xd4! ] 23.a4? [ White narrowly 9..¤e4 8.¥g2 ¤c6 7.a5 ¤xe5 31.¢e4 ¦xb7 43.¥e4?! [ 19.g4? [ Correct is Candidates' tournament 13.cxd4 20.¤b5 ¤d6 35.¥c4 ¦ab8 18.] 13. Keres and Petrosian 26.Robert James [ The first pointe is 44.¦a1 ¢g6 63.¦fb7 ¦xb7 31.¥xg4! 14.c3 ¤c6 6.¤d6!? ¦d7 35.¥xf8 the match tournament Curacao 1962.] 33.£f1 a3 33.¢e3 ¦d7 still draws.axb7 ¢c7 38..¦b1 ¦e5 64.¤xf5 £e6 30.f4 ¥g7 5..¦f8+ ¢e6 52.¦f3 35.¦g3 £xg3 8..d4 ¤f6 3. The ideas of £xa4 20.¦xb2 a6 27.¦f1+ 48..¢h1 ¤c6 10..¦a2! ¦xc2 24.¥b3 ¥e7 8.¢h3! ] 42..h4 ¦a3 matches next time.0-0 £a5 16.¦xe4 ¢f5! Fischer had won Stockholm 1962.e4 ¦xf8 28.¢g2 ¦d3 36.¤f3 c5 B88 15.¦f2 £c1+ 25.axb7 ¥xb7 ] ¦d1+= ] 19.¥c3 ¤xc3 11.¢e3 Fischer.Paul Petrovich 43.¦f8+ ¢e6 54.¦xd3 1.g3 ] world chess!" FIDE decided to organise candidates' 34.¦a7 ¦xe5 29. 12.¦a8 ¦f7 56.¦f2+ ¢e7 34. 27.¦a4 23.¥c4 e6 7.fxe5 ¤e7! 14.e5 7.¦b8 dxc5 8.¥xb5 ¦xb5 21.¦d4 ¦xd4 26.¢g4 ¦e7 57.¢f2? "I'll draw that game with my eyes shut!" Bobby told the press.¢xe5 ¢g6 5.¦ad1 d3! [ No winning chance gives 22.£g4! ] 7.¦e7 0-1 ¦e3 42.¥xc3!? [Theory is 7.Robert James Kortschnoj.¦a5+ ¢e6 58.h3? [ 23.. Geller and Boleslavsky analyse the adjourned position again.¤c7 £xa1 Korchnoi grabs anything.] 23.¢g3 ¦f5 49.¦a1 ¦d8 29.¤b5 ¤xa1 17..d4 cxd4 ( 6.cxd3 cxd3 24.¦c7 ¦f5 prey. the interzonal 67.¦e6+ ¢f7 5.¥b7 ¤xb7 37..¥xb7 ¦ab8 Candidates' tournament 1962 21..

My 160 Memorable Games
8.¤bc3 ¤xd4? 9.¤d5 £c5 10.¤xd4 ¥xd4
11.¥e3! ¥xe3 12.fxe3 £a5+ 13.b4 £d8 14.¦c1
¦b8 15.0-0 ¥d7 16.£d4 f6 17.¤c7+ ¢f7
18.e5!‚ Samarian,S-Wesen/corr/1958/] 5...¤c6
6.c3 e5! 7.d3 ¤ge7 8.a3 [ ¹8.¥e3 0-0 9.d4
exd4 10.cxd4 cxd4 ( 10...d5 11.¤bc3 ¥g4! )
11.¤xd4 ¤e5ƒ Pachmann,L-Tal,M Amsterdam
1964 ] 8...0-0 [ 8...a5 9.a4! >< b5 ] 9.b4 b6 10.f4
exf4! 11.gxf4 [ 11.¤xf4? cxb4 12.axb4 ¤xb4! ;
11.¥xf4 d5 ] 11...d5! [ 11...cxb4 12.axb4 ¤xb4?
13.f5! ¤ec6 14.e5 ] 12.e5 ¥g4 [ ¹12...¤f5
13.¤g3 ¤ce7 /\ f7-f6 ] 13.h3 ¥xe2 [ ¹13...¥e6
14.¤g3 £d7 15.¢h2 f6 ] 14.£xe2 f6 15.b5
[ 15.e6 f5 >< e6 ] 15...¤a5 16.¤d2 [ ¹16.¦a2
fxe5 17.fxe5 ¦xf1+ 18.£xf1 ¥xe5 19.¥g5! ]
16...fxe5 17.fxe5 ¦xf1+ 18.¤xf1 [ 18.¥xf1 £c7!
19.¤f3 ( 19.d4 cxd4 20.cxd4 £c3 ) 19...¤b3 ]
18...¤b3 19.¦b1 ¤xc1 20.¦xc1 £c7! 21.¦e1
[ 21.d4? cxd4 ] 21...¦d8 22.¤h2 [ 22.d4 cxd4
23.cxd4 ¤f5ƒ /\ Bh6 ] 22...d4 23.cxd4 cxd4
24.¤f3? [ 24.¤g4!
25.¦f1= ] 24...¥h6!
25.£a2+ ¢h8 26.£e6 ¤d5? [ 26...¤f5! 27.£f6+
( 27.¤h2? ¥e3+-+ ) 27...¥g7 28.£e6 ¦f8 /\ Bh6
29.¤g5 ( 29.¤h2 £c3! ) 29...¥h6 30.¤e4 ¥e3+
31.¢h1 ¥f4 32.¤f6 £c3 33.¦d1 £c2ƒ ] 27.¤h2!
[ 27.¤xd4? £c5 ] 27...¤e3 [ 27...¤f4? 28.£f6+
¢g8 29.¤g4+- ] 28.¥c6! ¦f8 29.¤f3= ¥f4
[ 29...£d8 30.£d6 ] 30.¤xd4 ¥xe5 31.¤f3 ¥d4!
32.¦xe3 [ 32.¤xd4?? £g3+ ] 32...¥xe3+ [ 32...£f4
33.¢f2! ] 33.£xe3 £g3+ 34.¢f1 £xh3+ 35.¢e1
£f5 36.d4 ¢g7 [ 36...h5? 37.£h6+ ¢g8
38.¥d5+ £xd5 39.£xg6+= ] 37.¢f2! [ 37.£e5+
£xe5+ 38.dxe5 ¦f4 /\ Ra4 ] 37...h5 38.¢g3 £g4+
39.¢h2 ¦f4 [ 39...£f4+ 40.£xf4 ¦xf4 41.¢g3³ ;
39...h4? 40.£e7+ ¦f7 41.£xf7+! ] 40.£e7+ ¢h6
41.£e2 £f5 42.£e3 g5 43.¢g2 ¦g4+ 44.¢f2
¦f4 45.¢g2 £c2+ 46.¢h1 [ 46.¢g3? ¦g4+
47.¢h3 £g2# ] 46...£b1+ 47.¢h2 £a2+ 48.¢h3
£f7 49.¢h2 £f6 50.¢g2 ¢g7 [ 50...g4?
51.¢g3 ] 51.¢g3 h4+ 52.¢g2 [ 52.¢h2? g4-+ ]
52...¦g4+ [ 52...g4 53.¤xh4! ] 53.¢h1 ¦g3
54.£e4 g4 55.¤h2 £g5 56.¤f1? [ 56.£e5+!
£xe5 57.dxe5 ¦xa3 58.¤xg4= ] 56...¦h3+?
[ 56...¦xa3! 57.d5 g3 58.d6 ( 58.¥d7 ¦a1
59.¢g2 ¦a2+ 60.¢g1 £f6 61.¥f5 ¦f2 ) 58...¦a1
59.£e7+ ( 59.¢g1 £c5+-+ ) 59...£xe7 60.dxe7
h3! 61.e8¤+ ¢f8-+ ] 57.¢g1 ¦xa3 58.d5 g3
59.¥d7! ¦a1 60.¥f5! £f6 61.£f4 ¦e1 62.d6
¦e5 63.£g4+! [ 63.d7? ¦xf5 64.£xf5 £xf5
65.d8£ £f2+ 66.¢h1 £xf1# ] 63...¢f8 64.d7 ¦d5
[ 64...¦xf5 65.d8£+! £xd8 66.£xf5+= ] 65.¢g2!
¦xd7! [ 65...£b2+ 66.¢h3 £f2 67.¥e4! £xf1+
68.¥g2 £f2 69.£b4+= '!' ] 66.¥xd7! £f2+ 67.¢h3
£xf1+ 68.¢xh4 g2 69.£b4+ ¢f7! [ 69...¢g7
70.£e7+ £f7 71.£g5+ £g6 72.£e7+= ] 70.£b3+
¢g7 71.£g3+ [ 71.£c3+? £f6+-+ ; 71.£b2+?
£f6+-+ ] 71...¢h7! 72.£e5!! '!' [ 72.¥f5+ £xf5

73.£xg2 £f4+! A) 74.¢h3 £h6+!-+ ( 74...£h6+
/\ Qg6+ und Qxg2 75.¢g4 ); B) 74.£g4 £xg4+
75.¢xg4 ¢g6!-+ '-+' ] 72...£h1+ [ 72...£f2+
73.¢h3 g1£ ( 73...g1¤+ 74.¢g4= ) 74.¥f5+ ¢h6
( 74...£xf5+ 75.£xf5+ £g6 76.£xg6+ ¢xg6
77.¢g4= '=' ) 75.£f6+ ¢h5 76.¥g6+! £xg6
77.£g5+!! 'patt' ¢xg5= ] 73.¥h3 £xh3+ [ 73...g1£
74.£h5+ ¢g7 75.£g6+!= '!' ( 75.£g6+! ¢f8
76.£f6+ ¢e8 77.£e6+ Dauerschach)] 74.¢xh3
g1£ 75.£e7+ ¢h8 76.£f8+ ¢h7 77.£f7+
[ 77.£f7+ £g7 78.£xg7+! ¢xg7 79.¢g3! '=' ¢f6
80.¢f4 ¢e6 81.¢e4 ¢d6 82.¢d4 ¢c7 83.¢d5
¢b7 84.¢c4 ¢c7 85.¢d5 ¢d7 86.¢e5= ]
Fischer,Robert James
Reshevsky,Samuel Herman
New York


FISCHER (Born 1943) Usually the style of a
chessmaster has to grow; it may take years before
one may speak of any style at all. As a rule the
young player begins with pure combination, and
then in the course of time finds that he must add
water to win. He learns the methods of positional
play, and develops endgame technique. It is quite
possible to begin as a combinative player - a
tactician - and yet in maturing to acquire an outand-out positional style of play. The exceptional
Grandmaster Fischer, however, is another and
almost unique story in modern chess. At the age of
twenty he already possessed a fully rounded style.
He is both tactician and strategist, an openings
expert without peer, and a virtuoso of the endgame.
The following game against Reshevsky is a good
example of his super-class, technical style 1.e4
c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6
6.h3 g6 7.g4 ¥g7 8.g5 ¤h5 9.¥e2 e5 10.¤b3
¤f4 11.¤d5 ¤xd5 [ 11...0-0 12.¤xf4 exf4
13.¥xf4 ¥xb2 14.¥xd6 ] 12.£xd5 ¤c6 13.¥g4
¥xg4 [ 13...£e7 14.-- ¥e6 ] 14.hxg4 £c8
15.£d1 ¤d4 16.c3 ¤xb3 17.axb3 £e6 18.¦a5
f6 19.£d5! £xd5 [ 19...£xg4 20.£xb7 0-0
21.gxf6! ] 20.¦xd5 ¢d7 21.gxf6 ¥xf6 22.g5!
¥e7 [ 22...¥g7 23.¦d3 -- 24.¦dh3 winning the hpawn ] 23.¢e2
Intending in due course to dissolve his doubled
pawn by Pb5, and saddle Black with a weak pawn
o n t h e Q u e e n s i d e b5
This should be avoided if
possible. Black now has three vulnerbla points - a6,
d6 and h7. How to profit from a situation like this
was the subject of "Technique of Maneuvering".
The present game prettily supplements the
examples there given 26.¦dd1! ¢e6 27.¦a1 ¦c6
28.¦h3 threatening to win the h-pawn ¥f8 [ 28...--

My 160 Memorable Games
29.¦ah1 ] 29.¦ah1 ¦c7 30.¦h4! Putting Black in a
state of zugzwang d5
[ 30...¦c4
32.¦4h3! ] 31.¦a1 ¦c6 [ 31...dxe4 32.¦xa6+ ¢f5
( 32...¢d5 33.¦xg6 l o s e s a p a w n) 33.¦f6# ]
32.exd5+ ¢xd5 33.¦d1+ ¢e6 34.¦d8 ¢f5
[ 34...-- 35.¦e8+ ¢f5 36.¦xe5+ ¢xe5 37.¥d4+
¢f5 38.¥xh8 ¢xg5 39.¦xh7 ] 35.¦a8 ¦e6
36.¦h3 ¥g7 [ 36...-- 37.¦f3+ ; 36...¢g4 37.¦g3+
Black is in a mating net] 37.¦xh8 ¥xh8 38.¦xh7
[ 39...¢e4 ;
40.¦a7+- ] 40.f3+ ¢g3 41.¢d3 An aethestic flaw
[ 41.¢f1 -- ( 41...¢h4 42.¢g2 ) 42.¥f2+ ¢h3
43.¦h7# ] 41...e4+ 42.fxe4 ¦d8+ 43.¥d4 ¢g4
44.¦f1 ¥e5 [ 44...¢xg5 45.¦g1+ ¢f4 46.¦xg6 ]
45.¢e3 ¥c7 46.¦g1+ ¢h5 47.¢f3 ¦d7 48.e5
¦f7+ 49.¢e4 ¦f5 50.e6 ¥d8 51.¥f6 ¥xf6
52.gxf6 ¦xf6 53.¢e5 ¦f2 54.¦e1
Fischer,Robert James
Saltsjobaden izt


1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 3.¤c3 ¥g7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0
6.¥e3 ¤bd7 7.£d2 c5 8.¤ge2 a6 9.¤g3 cxd4
10.¥xd4 ¤e5 11.¥e2 ¥e6 12.¤d5 b5 13.cxb5
axb5 14.¥xb5 ¤xd5 15.exd5 ¥xd5 16.a4 e6
17.0-0 £h4 18.¤e2 ¦fc8 19.¥e3 ¤c4 20.¥xc4
£xc4 21.¦fc1 £a6 22.¦xc8+ ¦xc8 23.¤c3 ¥c4
24.f4 d5 25.¥d4 ¥xd4+ 26.£xd4 £b7 27.£f2
¥a6 28.¦d1 ¦c4 29.¦d2 ¦xc3
Fischer,Robert James
Saltsjobaden izt


1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 ¤f6 4.¥g5 dxe4 5.¤xe4
¤bd7 6.¤f3 ¥e7 7.¤xf6+ ¥xf6 8.£d2 ¥xg5
9.¤xg5 ¤f6 10.¥e2 0-0 11.¦d1 £d6 12.0-0
¥d7 13.¤f3 ¦fd8 14.c4 ¥c6 15.¤e5 ¤d7
16.¤xc6 £xc6 17.¥f3 £a6 18.£c3 ¤f6 19.b4
c6 20.a4 ¦ac8 21.a5 b5 22.¦c1 h6 23.h3 bxc4
24.£xc4 £xc4 25.¦xc4 ¤d5 26.¦fc1 ¦b8
27.¦xc6 ¦xb4 28.¦c8 ¦xc8 29.¦xc8+ ¢h7
30.¦a8 ¦b7 31.a6 ¦d7 32.¦b8 ¦d6 33.¥e2 ¤c7
34.¦b7 ¤xa6 35.¦xf7 ¤b4 36.¦xa7 ¦xd4
37.¥g4 ¦d6 38.¦e7 ¤d5 39.¦xe6 ¦xe6 40.¥xe6

Fischer,Robert James
USA-ch 6263 New York


Estratégia - Carlos Alejandro Martinez - Aula 02
Variante 03 2-2-2, má configuração de peões,
estrutura central com d6-e5 pretas # 3 Estratégia Carlos Alejandro Martinez - Aula 02 Variante 04 22-2, má configuração de peões, estrutura central
com d3-e4 brancas # 4 1.e4
3.¥b5+ ¥d7 4.¥xd7+ £xd7 5.0-0 ¤c6 6.£e2
g6 7.c3 ¥g7 8.¦d1 e5 9.d4 exd4 10.cxd4
¤xd4 11.¤xd4 cxd4 12.¤a3 ¤e7 13.¤b5 ¤c6
14.¥f4 ¥e5 15.¥h6 0-0-0 16.f4 ¥f6 17.¥g5
¥xg5 18.fxg5 £e7 19.£g4+ £e6 20.£xe6+
fxe6 21.¤xd4 ¤xd4 22.¦xd4 e5 23.¦d3 '+/='
¦hf8 24.¦f3 ¢d7 25.¦c1 ¦xf3! 26.gxf3 ¢e6
27.¦c7 '!' ¦d7 '?!' 28.¦xd7 ¢xd7 '+/=' 29.¢f2
¢c6 30.¢e3 ¢c5 31.¢d3 ¢b4 '!' 32.¢d2 ¢c5
33.¢c2 ¢d4 34.¢d2 ¢c4 35.¢c2 ¢d4 36.¢d2
b5 37.¢e2 a5 38.¢d2 a4 39.¢e2 a3 40.bxa3
¢c3 41.a4 bxa4= 42.¢e3 ¢b2 43.¢d2
[ 43.¢d2
( 43...¢a3
45.¢c2= ; 43...¢a1 44.¢c1 ¢xa2 45.¢c2 ¢a3
46.¢c3 ¢a2 47.¢c2 a3 48.¢c3 ¢a1 49.¢c2
¢a2= ) 44.¢c2= e o Rei Preto nao pode mais sair
da lateral. ]
Fischer,Robert James
Varna Olympiad


1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 d6 5.c3
¥d7 6.d4 ¤ge7 7.¥b3 h6 Black can't play 7...
Ng6 because of 8.Ng5. 8.£e2
A novel way of confusing the enemy army. 9...Be6
loses a piece after 10.d5 Na5 11.Qa4+, so Black
must either play 9...Qe7, completely locking up his
own kingside, or expose his queen on f6. £f6
10.d5 b5 Otherwise White just captures on c7 and
gets away. 11.£e2 ¤a5 12.¥d1 ¥e7 13.g3
Black would have done better to simplify with 12...
Nh4 or f4, to get some space on the kingside.
Fischer prevents that and sets a nasty trap as well.
0-0 14.h4 ¦fc8 The losing move. Black had to
play 14...Nh8 or Bd8 to save the queen, though
things look grim then too. 15.¥g5 hxg5 16.hxg5
£xg5 Black would do better with 16...Nf4, though it
doesn't matter much, since after 16.gxf6 Nxe2 17.
f x e 7 N c 1 1 8 . K d 2 h e ' s d o w n a p i e c e . 17.¤xg5
¥xg5 18.¤a3 c6 19.dxc6 ¥e6 20.£h5 ¥h6
21.¥g4 ¥xg4 22.£xg4 ¤xc6 23.¦d1 b4

My 160 Memorable Games
24.¤c4 bxc3 25.bxc3 ¤d4 26.¤b6

16.gxh7+, when his own pawn on h7 would keep
the kingside closed, but 16.gxf7+ Kh8 17.Qxe3,
when h7 is a target and White already threatens 18.
R x h 7 + K x h 7 1 9 . R h 1 + . 16.¥h6
B90 Threatening 18.Qh3, when Black will have no
Fischer,Robert James
d e f e n s e t o m a t e o n h 7 o r h 8 . e5
Renewing the threat of Qh3. If Black takes the
Varna Olympiad
1962 knight he gets mated after 18...gxf5 19.Bxg7 Kxg7
20.Qg3+ Kf6 21.Qg5+ Ke6 22.ef. ¥xf5
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 ¤xb2
A last desparate bid for counterplay, but
5.¤c3 a6 6.h3 b5 7.¤d5 ¥b7 Black should F i s c h e r h a s s e e n e v e r y t h i n g . 20.¢xb2
probably take the pawn. White gets an initiative 21.¥xg7
Black may have missed this move. He
after 8.Qf3, but Black seems to hold. Now Najdorf's can't take the queen because of 22.f6 and mate on
king has nowhere to hide. 8.¤xf6+ gxf6 9.c4 h8. ¢xg7 22.¤xe4
The kingside is already unsafe, and no Fischer 1-0
goes to work on the center and the queenside.
10.¥xc4 ¥xe4 11.0-0
d5 12.¦e1
No rest for the weary. Black's last move is shown to
have serious drawbacks-- he can't get his bishop
Fischer,Robert James
back to b7, and his dark squares look weak. e5
13.£a4+ ¤d7 14.¦xe4 This sacrifice reopens the Varna Olympiad
a2-g8 diagonal and gives White control of all the
light squares in the center. dxe4 15.¤f5 ¥c5 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤c3 ¥b4 4.e3 d5 5.a3
Typically, Fischer's play is ruthlessly ¥xc3+ 6.bxc3 c5 7.¥d3 dxc4 8.¥xc4 £c7
a c c u r a t e . T h e t e x t a l l o w s W h i t e t o f i n i s h h i s 9.¥b3 b6 10.¤e2 0-0 11.¥b2 ¤c6 12.0-0 ¤a5
development with the Black king a sitting duck in 13.¤g3 ¥b7 14.¦c1 This loses instructively-t h e c e n t e r . ¢e7
18.¥e3 White obviously saw Black's next but figured that
Again, simple but deadly-Black must either lose after 15.f3 he had met the threat, but didn't notice
time retreating the bishop or give up d6. If 18...Qb6, that 14...Qb6 contained a subtler threat. £c6 15.f3
The subtler threat of 14... Qb6--White must
19.Bxf7+. ¥xe3 19.fxe3 £b6 20.¦d1 ¦a7 £b5
21.¦d6 £d8
Now if Black could only now lose a bishop, and, though he gives it a try, he
castle there would be some hope, but White's 16th can't trap Black's queen. 16.¥a4 £xb2
move ruled that out. £c7 23.¥xf7+ ¢d8 24.¥e6 0-1
Black is helpless-if he tries 24...Qc1+, after 25.Rd1
he has no way to cover b6 and b8 without giving up
Fischer,Robert James
Varna olm, XV finals
Fischer,Robert James
Simple Chess by Michael Stean 2. Outposts The
Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and
Varna Olympiad
1962 O'Connell # 564 Minhas 60 Melhores Partidas, por
Bobby Fischer #42 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 Variation 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4
5.¤c3 g6 6.¥e3 ¥g7 7.f3 ¤c6 8.£d2 0-0 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6 6.¥e2 e5 7.¤b3 ¥e6 [ 7...¥e7
9.¥c4 ¤d7 The slowest continuation accepted by Pilnik,H-Fischer,R Mar del Plata 1959]
theory. Black hopes to get play against White's ¤bd7 9.f4 £c7 10.f5 ¥c4 11.a4 ¥e7
queenside with his knights, but weakens his king [ 11...¦c8? 12.a5 ¥e7 13.¥xc4 £xc4 14.¦a4!
position. 10.0-0-0 ¤b6 11.¥b3 ¤a5 12.£d3 £c7 15.¥e3 h6 16.¦f2± Schmid,L-Evans,L Varna
White doesn't want to allow either knight to move to ol 1962 ] 12.¥e3 0-0 13.a5 [ 13.g4 d5! 14.exd5
c4, which would force him to give up his Be3. Black ( 14.g5 d4! ; 14.¤xd5 ¤xd5 15.exd5 ¤f6 16.d6?
might then get strong play on the dark squares. ¥xd6 17.¥xc4 £xc4 18.£xd6 £xg4+ 19.¢h1
¥d7 13.h4 ¦c8 14.h5 So White draws first blood. £e4+ ) 14...¥b4 15.g5 ¥xc3 16.gxf6 ¥xb2
Once he takes on g6 he will be able to play Bh6, 17.fxg7 ¦fd8 18.¦b1 ¥c3µ ] 13...b5 [ 13...h6
l e a v i n g B l a c k ' s k i n g n a k e d t o t h e w i n d . ¤ac4 14.g4 ¤h7 15.¥f2ƒ /\ h2-h4 ] 14.axb6 ¤xb6
15.hxg6 hxg6 If 15...Nxe3, White would not play 15.¥xb6? [ 15.¢h1! ¦fc8 16.¥xb6 £xb6 17.¥xc4

£a7! 25..¥xe7 ¦d7 19. Moscow (m/4).¤b6 Botvinnik .axb4 ¤xf4+ 25..¢b1 £c8 13.¢e3 £c1+-+ ..£xc7 ? £xb2 'with the idea'Qb4] 17.b6 ' p a s s e d p a w n ' 24.£c5 [ 11.£d3 ¥xf3 12.¤xc7 ¤d4 ] 14.¤b5² Portisch ..c4 g6 2.£d4 ('with the idea'Bg4) c5 20.£xa2 30.¦f3+ 28..¢h2 £xf2+ 62.¦g7 ¦a1 51.¥xc6 bxc6 18.¢f1 £xh7 67..¢f1 [ 26.¥e3 [ 8.¢g2 ¤c5 35.¤e5 ¥e6 9.£d3 ^...¦d4 e5 .¦f7+ ¢e5 50.¦xa4 £g7+ ! ( 65..¦xh7 ! [ 47...¥c4 ! ('with the idea'Re1-e7$36) ¤e6 25.£xc4 0-0 7.¦d3 ! ¦c5 47.¦xd4 ( 26.¥g4 Botvinnik ] 28.£xf4 ! [ 17. 10.dxc5 ¥xc3+ 15.£xb6 ? £e4 ! 19...e5 [ 27.¢d4 b5 50..¢d4 ! 52.f4 ¥f6 19.d4 ¤f6 3.¥h2 ¤d4 26.h6 b2 56.. 12.¤xe6 fxe6 17.e5 !? £xc5 13.¥f3 ? [ 24..¦b6+ ¢g7 53..dxc6 bxc6 21..¢d5 52.¢d3 = Botvinnik..gxf3 [ 13.] 17.¢g4 b5 51.g3 ¤b4 20.¤d5 ¤xd5 19.h5 b4 55.¦ad1 ¦c8 22.¦xe5 ¦xd6 30. 21.¦a3 £h1+ 68.b3 ¤d6 Arencibia .¦d2 ? ¥c1 27.e5 ! 17.¢h2 £b8+ 59.¥xf3 a5 15.¦fe1 ¦cc7 ! ] 31.d5 [ 14.a3 ¤xf2 22..f4 ¥h6 18.fxe6 26.c3 [ 20.£a6 [ 20..¥xf3 13.¥xd4 27. Palma de Mallorca.¢g2 !? ¤f6 28.0-0 ¤bd7 [ 22.¦b7+ = Botvinnik] 49..d5 ¥c8 = 'with the idea'e6] 8.¦h3+ ¢c2 64. >< e4 20.. 'with the idea'Rb1.¥xe5 dxe5 18..¤b5 'passed pawn' [ 15..¦d4 = Botvinnik] 46.¥g4 ¦xf4 28.M-Fischer. 26. 51.¥g2 ¤f6 ) 26.¢f3 ¢g5 41. 14.¤xc5 19.¢d3 ¢d5 51. Ne5] 25..£xd6 cxd6 = ) 16.¥xf3 ¥xe5 16.h4+ ¢f5µ ] 43.¥g5 24.£b5 ( 16.¦f3+ [ 36.¢f3 ' p a s s e d p a w n ' b5 ? [ 51.¦xd8 ¤xh3+ 23.¦c8 22.£b4 a5 19. B) 24.¥g4 c5 22.¤cd7 23....¦e3 [ 27..¦d7 a6 17.£xd6 cxd6 != .£xa8+! ] 21..¦fa8? 21..¦e7 ¦d7 31.¦b7 ! ¦a5 50.£xc3 £xf1+! Kmoch.¥xe4 ¦xe4 43..f3 a5 44.¤c7 ( 17.¤b6 11.¤xd7 32.£e5 ! 60.¤b3 £b7= Z u c k e r m a n . a 6 .¤ec4 ! 16.h3 [ 12. 36.¦e1 ¥c5 28.¥d5 ] 32.¦xc3-+ 25.dxc5 ¦xd1+ 16.¦xc3 White resigns for: 27.¤xa7 ? ¤a4 ) 17.¢f3 ¢e6 48...bxc3 ¤a4 16. 67.¢h1 ¥b5! / \ B c 6 ...Hort...¤d3!? bxc3 24.¤xg7 ¢xg7 22.¥f2 £b4+-+ ] 18.a 5 17.¦h4 a4 65..¤b5 £xc5 15. 1997 =.¦d2 ¦f8 28..¢e2 ¢c4 54.¤xc7 ¦ac8 20.¦c7 33.¥xb7 ¦b8² Botvinnik ] 23.¥e7 ¦d7 31.¥xc5 ¤xc4 18.¦d4 f6 !$17 Botvinnik) 16.£f5 18.dxc5 ¤d7 ( 13.¦a2! Geller.¦g4 = 'with the idea'Rg3-e3) 66.¢xe2 ¥xe5 15.¢g1 £h8 ( 59.h4+ ! ¢f5 [ 48.£xb6+ 16..¤c8 14.¦ab8 18.£xd6 cxd6 16.¢f3 ? h5 !$19 .¦c1 ¥b2 = ) 26.¢d1 £xa2 ) 29.¢d3 54.¤xe6 [ 25.¤d5 ¢f8 'with the idea'Re8.¦d3 [ 26.f4 ¤ed7 17..¥xf3 £xc5 14...d7 ¦cd8µ ] 27.¦xe7+ ¢xe7µ ] 36.¤d5 ¢g7 ] 23..¥xe5 ¥xe5 29..¦xd7 [ 31.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 17..¦e1 ¢f7 34..¦xb4 axb4 46.¦xa6 ¦xa6 22..f4+ ¢f5 47.¢h2 [ 23.¢h6 46.¦xa2 £xa2 27.bxc3? £f2# ) 27.¢xd1 ¤d7 17.¦e7 ? [ 43.¦a2+ ( 67.R Curacao ct 1962.bxc3 A) 24..¥e2 ¤c6 [ 9..¢e4 ( 48..¥e5 ! ¤xd5 29.¤f3 ¥g7 5.£d6 ! 12.d5 ¤a5 11.¦xh7 ¦a3+ ! 45.h7 ¦h1 ! 57.¢a3 ¢c3-+ ] 44.¥f2 ¤ed3 21.¢f6 49.¢d6 49..¦f7 ¦a5 47.d6 ¤c8 20.gxf3 e5 13.¦fe1 h6! 23.¥d4 ¦fc8 17.¦g8 £e1+ 61.¢g2 ¦a2! 26..¦xd6 ? ¤bd7 ] 21.gxf4 ¦d4 26...¤xd5ƒ 'with the idea'Nf6.H .f4 a6 52..¤e6 ! 25.. 'with the idea'Rd1 ] 24..¦g4+ ¢b5 56.R Curacao ct 1962 h6! 20.¦a5 Tal.dxe6 ?! ¥xc3+ ! 18.0-0-0 ¤b6 11.¢b2 b3 ! 53.0-0 ¦ad8 19.Kudrin..¥a6 ( 26...¦e3 ¦e7 36.a4 ¦c5 [ 45.¢g2 ¦xd8 24.£d8+ ¥f8! ) 26.¥b4! 27.¥xc4 £xc5 17.Robert James XV Olympiad Varna 1962 1.¤c5 27.axb5 18.¦g4 .¦dd1 ? ¦f8 27.¥xb5 [ 17.¢g2 b3 55..¦c7 ¦a4 44.£xd7² Botvinnik ] 18..f4 g5 ! 18.£xe5 ( 26.¢g4 h6 ) 48.¥d1 ¦d4 [ 38.¦f3 ¦c7 45.¦xc3! [ 26.¢xh1 b1£+ 58.e5 ¤xb2 19.¥c1 ¤d4÷ ] 13.¤g5 ¤dxe5 16.¦a3 e5 29.¢g7 37.Mikhail M Fischer.. Linares.f3 £h4+ ! 20... 1997) 14.¤c3 d5 4....h4 ¦a5 48.h3 ¥xf3 15. 1958 ] 10..¥g5 ¦xd6 30.¤xe5 ¥xe2 14.d6 exd6 21.£xd5 '# ' ¦a4! a <->.¢h3 £f3+ !$19 ) 60.¦c4 ¦f7µ 'with the idea'Kf5] 47....exd6 [ 21.¦e1 %03'better is' ¢f8 33...¦b1 ¥c3 27...¢d3 ( 29..¢g2 ¢h4-+ 'with the idea'Ne6-f4 Botvinnik] 42..¦b8 27..¦ad1 >= ] 24.d5 ¤e5 13..My 160 Memorable Games 25 ¦xc4 18.¦d5 [ 23..Smyslov..¤fd7 9.¦d1 [ 10.¥xe5 ¤xe5 25..¤xe5 dxe5 26.¦f4 ¦f5 48.Konguveel.¢e2 £d1+ 69. 12. Chicago.e4 ¥g4 8.¦fd8 [ 13.¦b3 ¦b4 45.f4 !$16 Fischer] 16..¢c2 ¢c4 52.£xh7 66.¢g3 ¤e4+ [ 41.h4 h5-+ ) 53.¦g4+ ¢c3 61.e5 [ 17.£xc5 ? 16. 1971] 10.¥xf4 [ 18.dxc5 ¤c4 15.¢g2 ¢b3 63.¥c2 ¢f6 40. Goeteborg.h3 ¥xf3 14...¦c3 ¦e4 38..£f6 ! [ 15.f3 ¦xa2 46.¦xa4 48.¥xc5 c6 17.¥g4 [ 32..b3 ¤c3 18.¥f3 ¥e5 24.¦a1 £xb2-+ ] 0-1 D98 Botvinnik.£a4 c6 ...d5 ¤d4 = Botvinnik] 11.¤e8 ! ¤xe7 21.¦xa2 ( 27.¤a5 £c7 24..¤xb5 >= axb5 18.¢e2 ¦f2+ 29.E-Fischer.bxc3 £xe6 ] 15.¦xc7² Kaufman .¦xg6 b5 53.¢d2 !$16 Furman] 14.¦xg6 b5 53.¤c1 a3 ] 23.¦b4 42.h5 b4 A) 54..a5 ! 44.¦xa4 bxa4 24..h3 '?' [ 21.b5² Ziegler Pribyl.¤d2? ¦d4 ] 20...£c5 e6 12..¤e5 15.f4 ¤ed7 ( 15..¦ad1 ] 21.a3 h6 54.£e2 ¦b4 19.¦h4 a5 62..¦c1 ¤c4 19.axb3+ ( 53.dxc5 ¤a4 ! 16...¥d4 ?! 28.£xc5 14..g3? weakening [ 24..¦e2 ¦xc3! ] 26.fxg5 ¥xe5 = ..£b3 dxc4 6.¥xb2 22.¤c1 b4 23.e5 £xc5 15.h3 ¥e6 15...¦xa6 £b7 23..a3 ¦d4 43. B] 15...¦a3 'passed pawn' [ 43....¦fa1 ¥f8 21. 1997] 12.¥h2 ¤d4 26.¥xe6+ ¦f7-+ Fischer ] 26.¦e1 ! ] 39.

£g3 ¥f5 30.¦xg4 ¦h2+-+ .¢h1 ¥f8 15.£c7 10.e4 e6 2.¦g7 ! b2 58.¦g7 ? b2 61..RBe1-e3-h3] 17.¦a6 b3 57.¦c1 £b8 14..¦e3 ¦d1+ 36..¥a4 0-0 9.¢e3 ? £h3+ !$19 ) 70.¦b7 ¢c4 59. 9.d4 d5 3.¦xa7+ ¢b6-+ ) 60.£xf2+ 71.£g4 ¤f6 7.h7 ¦h1 56.¦b7 = Botvinnik) 57.¥xc4 a5 5. Qc1 -+] 43.¥e8 ¢e7 48.¦c3 £e1+ 69.Ronald Bay City 1963 Fischer's Chess Games by Wade and O'Connell p150 #284 Estratégia .d4 exd4 7.¦e4 ¦d7 '-+' 40..¦b6+ ¢f7 63.Reuben 29.¦g4+ ! ( 55.¦e2! .¢d3 = Kasparov] 52.¥b4 28.e5 7.£xf4 ¤e8 24.f4 g6 17..¦b7+ ¢c2 61..¢f4 ¦e1 ! 65.¥f7 47... [Zeuthen/Jarlnaes 71] b6 10.h3 ¥b7= ] 7.£xg7 ¦g8 8.¦c6 ¦d3 67.£xb2 27.¢xe4 ¢f6 54..¥xe4 ¥xe4 53...¦c4 ! ( 67. the position of the white Q gives Black the additional possibility of Nf6-g4 with tactical threats.¦g2 ¦d8 8.dxc6 ¥xc6 ¤d7 13..¤d5 41.¤e2 0-0-0 14..¥f1 ¦f7 24.¥g3 ¢e7 37.¢e6 £b6+-+ ) 61.¦a3+ 53.¦xa7 ¢b3 60.b4 ¥xb4 5.¦xg6? £c1+ /\ 32..£e3 From here the white Q brings pressure to bear on Black's e-pawn. 67.¦b5 ¢d6 61.¦e1 £b6 20.¥b3 ¥g6 46.¢d4 a6 41..¦c7+ ¢d2 62.¥a3 ¦fd8 15.0-0 b5 10.£g4 [ 41.¦g3 £f1+-+ ) 67.¦b7 ¦h1 .] 10.bxc3 dxe4 6.h5 ! [ 52.¥e2 ¢c8 19.¦e3 £xc2 Fine.cxd5 f6 36.¦e2? £xg4 44. 65...g5 ¥g4 49.¢h2 a5 59....¦g7+ ( 58..¦d8 £h4+ 31.¥b2 ¤c6 11.Robert James [ 27..£g4 ¦h1+ later ...h8£ £e4+-+ ) 59.¦d3+ 42.gxf5 ¥xf5 45.£d5+ £d6 28.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦ad1 h6 Fischer.h4 B80 ¤xf4 23...¥b7 ¥f5 0-0 9..¦g6+ ¢b7 ! 58.¤e2 ¥b7 11. Black's move uses the threat of a '-/+' 35..h6 £d6 Fischer.¢e5 b5= ] 9.¢d2 ¤d6 38.£g8+ £b3+-+ .¤xc6 bxc6 12.¢e2 ( 65.a3 ¥xc3+ 5.¦g1 1.¤de2 ¥e7 8.g4 ¤c6 11.¢d3 ? 56..¢a5 60.¦g7 a5 62.¦g1 £h3+ 69.£e2 £g5+ i n e a c h o t h e r s ' w a y .¦xg6 ¢d4-+ ] 52.[Se 46.¦b4 ¢c2 57.£h6 ¦g6 In "Schach Archiv" 1971.£f3 ¦a7 23.h7 b1£ 61..h7 b1£ 64.¢b4 57.¢a6 ! 59.hxg6 fxg6 [ 20.c4 bxc4 42.0-0 dxc3 8..¢f5 £xf2+ 67.h4 [ 17.a5 1-0 18. 27.¦e5 £d4+ 66.¦a6 ¢g6 64..¢e3 ¦b1 !! 67.£f8+ ¢a2 68.¢g2 gxh5 54.¤f4² [Zeuthen/Jarlnaes 71] ¦g8 18.f6 ¢e6 62.¥f5 ¥g8 52. Qb4 to get play.¥xh7 c6 51.Robert James Finegold.¥g6! ¥d7 50.¢xg2 £c1! 0-1 C15 Fischer..¦a6 a3 68.¦g5+ ( 60..¦g2 ¢d2 70. Bxc3 or 30.£g3 ¤g6 22.¥xd6+ 1.¥c8 ¥f7 51. 9.¢c3 ? 56.¦h3 ¢a2 ! 68..e5 ¥xc3 33.gxh6 £xc2 '/\ 30.g4 ¥g6 32.£f4 £e6 31.¦h5 b2 62.¦h4 b2 63.¥c4 ¥c5 4..¥a6 ¥g6 50.¦xc3 £e4+ 34. B) 54.h3 £e7 13...¦g5+ ¢c6 ! ( 56.¢g2 ? b2 60.¦xd8+ ¥f8µ ] 28.¢g1 ¢e1 71.¦a5÷ .c4 e5 15..h8£ £d3+ 64.Svetozar 29.¦xd8+ ¢xd8 21.h7 b1£ 58.£b3 £e7 31.¦xa7 ¦xh6 58.¤ce2 ¥d7 49.f4 [ 9.c3 ¢h7 31.f6 52.¦g4 £h5µ ] 41.¢h1 ¦xd8 33..e4 e5 2..¦h1 55..hxg6? ] 21.£d1+ 66.Carlos Alejandro Martinez Aula 05 Variante 04 Luta do B bom contra o B mau Posições diversas # 4 1.£g3 [ 31...¤xc3 ¤f6 10.£d2 com vantagem decisiva.£xe5 C52 [ 26.¥a2 f5 44.b3 £c7 10.¥xa6 £xa6 25..Robert James 26.¢g3 [ 43.¢g2 ? £d5+ 66.¥f4 ¤e5!³ 16.g3 e6 [ 6.¢a4 ! 61.¦e3 ¥b4 29.e4 c5 2..¤f3 d6 3.¥g2 43.£xc2? 28....f5 ¦e8 14.¢e3 b5 39.¢g2 ! ¦h5 56.h8£+ .£g5+ Varna ol (Men) 1962 £e7 33. Qf2' 30.¦g8 32. Qxe3] ¥a5 6.¢h2 £b1 37.c4 ¦ac8 13..¥b2 £e7= (eco 74/81) Strelakovsky-Petrov USSR 1955 If 13 0-0-0..£d5+ £d6 34.¦c6 a4 65.¥b2 [ 10.¢g3 £c1 39.¥xe4 12. 61.¢b3 68.¥e5 £xd5 35.h5 ¥a6 19.¥c6 ¥g6 48.¦b8 ! h3+ 58.Qf6 is normal.£c5 = Botvinnik) 67..¥b7 11.¦g4+ ( 61.f4 ¢c6 57.h3 ¤bd7 12.¢d2 ( 70...¢g2 £g4+ Poughkeepsie 1963 32.0-0-0 ¤bd7 12. 67.¢f3 = Botvinnik) 55.¦g4 ? a5-+ ) 58.f5 ¢c7 60.¢f2 ¦d2+ White forces Black to open the e file onto his own .¦h4 b2 57.h8£ £b3+ ! 65.¦xb5 h4 56.¤xd4 ¤f6 ¢xd6 40.¦g5+ ¢d6 55.¦b3+ 68.¥g2 ¥e7 8.¢f4 ? £f7+ .b3 £c5³ ] 26. 55. Euwe remarks that the maneuver Rg8-g6 seems to entail more drawbacks than advantages for Black..¢f3 ¦xg2 /\ 44. 43.¦ed3 £f2 30.¦d1 ¦d8 20.¥xe5 dxe5 22.dxe5 ¤xe5 16.¢c5 ! ( 55.£g5+ £e7 Gligoric.£e1 /\Qh4.d4 cxd4 4.£c3+ ? ¦b3 .¦xd8+ ¢xd8 17.¦a6 ¢f7 66.¦c4+ = ) 56.h5 ¥c8 25. on the other hand..My 160 Memorable Games 26 £h1+ 68.¤c3 a6 6.h7 ¦h1 ! 59..£g3 £b6 26..¦g6+ ( 59.¢d3 £f1+ 70. game transposes to main variation.¦g7 a5-+ ) 55.¤c3 ¥b4 4..f3 £d2+-+ Fischer ) 65.h6 ! b3 ( 54.0-0 ¥f5+..] 47.h7 b1£ 63...¢a3 62..£g5+ £e7 27.¢g1 ½-½ 43.¦xg2+ 44.. but Black's pieces just get 38.

.¦h3 cxd4 what else? 18. exf5 50. ¤xd5 11.R-Fischer... Then if 7.¤xg6 hxg6 23.¦e1 ¦f7 14. 18.Pal Charles US Championship 1963 1. B) 15.a5 ¦c6 31. Rf3 and 17.¢e3 ¤f6 40. and the bishop does little from its post at g7..¥g2 ¦a7 64.d4 ¥g7 3.cxd7+ ¤bxd7 7.Qxh6+ Kg8 22.¢e3 ¤d6 70. Rxa5? Rb1+ grabs the Bishop.d5 b5! 5. For example 10.¥xd4 The knight at d4 was a potential defender on the kingside. but white's extra pawns are not enough to turn the tide.¢d2 ¦hb7 53.Robert James USA-ch New York 18.¥xd5 ¤xe5 14.h4 f5 26.0-0 0-0= Byrne.¢e3 b6 46.e4 C18: French: 3 Nc3 Bb4: Main line: 7 h4 and 7 Qg4 e6 2. accentuating his lead in development.¥e3 e5 10.¥f5 9.Robert E Fischer.¥b2 White's lead in development is decisive.£f3 ¤e4 27.¥g5 ¢f7 59. but OK for black.¥g2 ¦b8 8.S. 19.exd4 19.¤e2 Here Black resigned. If Black doesn't White wins by doubling on the e file and mating on e7 or e8. Qg4 when black would play 7.¥h5+ ¤g6 wins a pawn at the expense of opening the center uncastled for one of history's great attacking players.¤xe5 £xe5 13.e5 h6 21.0-0 c4 [ The Bishop must be dislodged from its powerful diagonal before black castles.£g4 c6 17..Edmar U..dxc6 bxc4 6.f4 ¤f6 5.e5 h6 21...¤c3 d6 4.£f8+ ¤g8 17..dxe5 ¥xe5= Benko.¢h1 ¤d6 [ Now the immediate 21.1963 1.fxe5 13. 0-1 C18 Fischer.¦fe1+ ¢d8 17..g4 ¥e8 42. f5.¤f3 0-0 6..¢g1 ¢f7 25. Perhaps this move was a bit impatient.¦a1 ¦b7 48.¥a3 0-0 [ 12.£xc7 ¦xc7 30. The pawn is untouchable 56.£b3 ¤c6 11.g3 £a5! Forcing an ugly defensive move.¤f3 0-0 8.0-0 ¤d6 15.¦ee1 ¥c6 34. £xh4 15.¤xe5 £xe5 15.¦f3 ¤h6 17.£f2 ¤e8 14.d4 ¤f6 2. 56..h3 ¥xf3 8. 19.£f5 1-0 D71 Byrne.¢f4 ¤b5 71.¦e3 ¤f7 21..¥b4 ¦h8 33.f4! and black will find it hard to stop 16..£h5 ¦g7 18.¥f1 ¦e8 16. then 7. Qg4.¢c1 ¦2b6 54. The idea is to encourage Black to move the bishop to a position where it blocks the f-pawn from advancing..£f4 ¦c8 28.e4 g6 2.¥b4 h4 72.My 160 Memorable Games 27 king.¥f8+ ¢c6 67.£h5 £e8 White has the f-file..f5 gxf5 12.¦e2 ¦e6 60.e3 [ 7.cxd5 [ 5.h5 gxh5 44.¢d1 ¤c8 62..¦h2 a4 57.¥g2 [ 4.Robert James Mednis..£g3 ¢h8 16.¥f3 ¤d2 35.£xe6 ( is good for a draw because white gets into trouble after the complicated 16.bxc3 £c7 This move is designed to discourage 7.0-0 . but Black has a defense. There might follow.R ch-USA 1962 ] 4..¥e2 f6 12. For example: A) The defensive recourse 15.¦e1+ ¢d6 65.¤c3 ¥b4 4.£g3 The second deflection of the queen. f5! Qxe8 Nxe8 19. Black's forces are scattered. for example ¤c8 22.¢f3 ¤e4 39.exf6 gxf6 15. £g5 14.d5 5.gxf5 White is not prepared to exploit the attacking chances created by this line opening move.g3 c6 4.¤c3 ¥g7 7. Rh3. e5 looks like it wins a piece.0-0 ¤e4!= ) 8.£b3 ] 5. Kg3 f4+) 75. because of the threat of Qxh7 mate.¦ag1 ¥e8 45.. eliminating the defense mentioned in the previous note..¤f5 16.£xf7+ ¢h8 15. Championship B09 1963 1..P-Fischer.Robert James Benko.¤h4 ¤g6 17.¥h6 a3 66.Qh7+ ¢g8 20. 7.bxc3 £xd5 13.Rf6 Bxf6 20. Fischer exploits these factors quickly.£h5 ¦fc8 14. because mate is still unavoidable.¥d6 ¦h7 49.¦xe6 ¢xe6 61. well-placed pieces and a slightly better pawn structure.¥e8 16.¥g2 £c7 29.¦h4 ¢e6 51.¤f3 ¥d7 8.¢f4 ¥b5 43..h4 Deflecting the queen from g7. a more modern idea is simply 6..£xd5 ¤xc3 12.¥c5 ¦a8 68.¦f6 A brilliant move.] 13.¤f3 ¥g7 9. 1-0 passed pawn will eventually win the game for black in classic style. 73.0-0 11.dxe5 dxe5 11.¢g2 ¤f6 37.e5 c5 5..¦h1 ¥e8 38.£xf5 ¤d4 13. but the tactics Fischer uses to prove this are most instructive.¥a3 ¦a6 32.¥d3 ¥g4 7.¦xh6+ is mate next] 11.¤g5+ ¢g8 13.c4 g6 3.¤e5 ( 8.¥h3 ¤e7 58.cxd5 6. exd4 18.¥xg7 ¦g8 16...¤f5! ] 22.¥e2 ¤e4 36. and this time there is no answer-Black can't hold both his queen and the d8-h4 diagonal.¥d3 ¤bc6 10. Re8! (threatening Ne6+) 74. cxd4 is complicated.f3 ¥d7 41. Bxf5 Rxh4+ wins a piece for 3 pawns.¦f3 ¥h5! ).£xf3 ¤c6 9.¢d2 ¥d7 63.R ch-USA 1962] 7.£e2 ¦h7 24.12. Bxh4 Rh8! (75..exd5 ¤e5 12.a3 ¥xc3+ 6. Ne7.¥xh7+ ¢xh7 12.¥h2 ¦b2 52.axb6 ¦xb6 47.¥h3 ¤c7 73.¦a1 a2 69. and the bishop was not going to participate in the attack anyway.¥e7 White resigns after making this move in adjournment.¥f1 ¤g8 55.0-0 ¤e4 10.¥f4 a5 This outside Fischer. However.d4 d5 3.¥xa4 gets refuted by 22. 20.dxe5 ¤xe5 14.¥b2 ¤d8 The isolated pawn on a4 becomes a target.a4 ¤e7 9.

£e2 ¥xd3 20..My 160 Memorable Games 28 8.¤c3 g5 10.¢g2 ¥d3! 25.£xd4 ¦e1+! 23.d5 ¥g4 8.¥g4 6.] 14.12.¤e1 ¥h6= ] 10. in fact.¥b2 ¹ £f5ƒ ..¥f4 ¦de8 30.d4! ¥e6 ( 5. C) 14.¥xd5 ¥d3 17.exf6 £xf6 27.¢g1 ¥xd4+ 22.¤xe5 14.¦xb7 ( 26.¤d4 ¤g4 21..¤f3 [ 2..0-0 b6 10.¦b8+ ¢g7 28.... at this point..¥b2 ¦h1 ) 26.¢g3 £xh4+ 18.¤d5! ¤xd5 19..¢f2 £xd4+ 24..¦f8+ ¦xf8 36.f4!? e6µ … ¥f8.£e7 8.dxe5 £xe5 14...¤e2 ¤b4 13..S ch-USA 1959] 9..f3! ) 14.Arthur Bernard USA-ch 6364 New York C98 2629 2459 19.¦f1 £e6 29. F) 14.f6! ] 17. B) 14.f4± .¥xe6 fxe6 8.¦fd1? 'The wrong Rook!' [ 14.£d2™ ¤xg2! 'A brilliant attack now ensues.¥b2 ¦c8ƒ ..¦xd5 20..e5 [ 10.£e2 [ 6.fxe5 ¥xe5µ .¥xa1? 17.' [ 12...¤f3 ¥h6 24.¦ad1± +/= Lipnitzsky] 16. Black's piece activity offsets the resulting isolani..¥xa8 ¦xa8 21.¢f1 'There is a great story that accompanies this game....¤g5 ¥c8 18..¢g1 ¤h6 19. E2) 19.£c7 15..¦e1 ¦c8 13.¤xf4 £xh4? [ 17..£d3 g5 10...£d4 f6 10.£xf4 £e7 32.£xc4 b5 9.¦cd1 ¦ad8 .f4 exf4 3..£b3± Hanstein-Bilguer/1838] 5.£d2 [ 12.¥f1 ¦d1 24.¥c4 £h4+ 4.c3 ¤a6 15.d4 £c7 [ 11.£xc8 ¦axc8 19..£e2 ¤h5 [ 15.¤c2 h5‚ ) 21.¤xd5 ( 15.£d3 ¤c6 7.¤xd5 ) 10.¤f4? d4! ) 16. Closed 1.¥xa8 ¤xd2 19.¥e3 ¤c7 24.¦xa8µ × c4..¤f3 £h6 9..£f2 ( 22.¥c2 c5 11.¤xd5 . 21.exd5 ¥xg5 ( 19.c3 d6 [ 8..¦ad1! ¹ A) 14.¥xe4 ¥a6 19.¥b5 a6 4.£f3! ¥e6 21.¤f3 £g4 9.¦c1 £d7! 16.¥b5! ¥d7 8.£d3 ¥e3+ 25.e4 e5 2......¤d4 ¤e4 16.. 9..Robert James Evans.¥a4 ¤f6 5.¤xc1 ¥xf1 18..£d2 ¦g8 25..¦d7+.d5!? M a r s h a l l .¤c6 3. F 9.¦fd1 e4 15.¤e3 ¦ad8 16. ¦ec8] 12.e6= ] 13.£c2 [ 15.exd4 ¦c8 15. ...a4+. D) 14.¥xe8 ¥xe2 22.dxc6 exf3 11.c6 7.Robert James Bisguier.¥xg5 ¦xd5 21.f3µ ] 13..¥c6! A v e r b a k h .¥b2 ¦xa2-+ .Larry Melvyn USA-ch 6364 New York C33 2629 2520 16.¦ab1 ¦c8 18..£xf3 ¥g4 12. and announced that Byrne had resigned! Can you guess Fischer's deadly final stroke?' [ 21..£xd5 ¥b7! E1) 19.¦fe1 ( 21..¤f1 ¦d8!? [ 14.¤e4 15. ¦fd1 ¦ac8 16.¢xf2 ¤g4+ 17. 12.¤e3 /\ 16.f4 exf4 3.e4 e5 2. He had been completely mystified by this game.£b5+ ) 7.h4 g4 16..¦c1 ¦d7 21.£d3 ¥xc4 ( 6.¤xe5 ¤d7 12.h4 ¥e7 13. 15...£c2 .¦c1 .....h4 ¤xe5 13.¥e6!? 6..£d8+ £xd8 20.¤f6 7.£c8! 15.g3! .¦f6 ¤e6 33. ¦a8-c8-c7.¥e6 15.f3 ¥f5 15.Fischer.¥c4 £h4+ 4.£xc4 g5 10.¦xd1= ] 19.dxc6 ¤xc6= Beuthner-Cyon/Leipzig/1866] 6.. 14..£e2 g6 .¢xe3 ¦e8+ 27.¦d1 ¤c4 20.b3 [ 10.¦xd4 ¦xa1 25.¤e7+ ¢h8 20.¤f4 ¦g5 23.S Kemeri 1937] 10.h3 ¤a5 10.¤xe3!-+ .¤d6 ) 17.¦xc3 27.¤fg3 ¦g6 22.REvans.¢xg2 d4! 20.£d2 £h3! 20.¥a6 11.¥g2 ¦c2 18...¤xd5 16.¦c8 14.12.d4 c6 7.¤bd2 ¤c6 13.¤h2 h5 [ 16.¦h6 ¥xf4 31.£h3 ¥xb1! 22.¤d7 Fischer.¤xd5! £xc1 17.e5! 'Opening the center.¢xh4 ¦xe1 19.R/US C h a m p i o n s h i p 1 9 6 3 ( 2 1 ) ' [ 21.£e5 ¤g5 34.¥xd5 ¦d8 17.¦c8 15.£xe3 ¦xe3 26.¦xe1 ¥xd4-+ ] 0-1 Fischer.¢f2 £d7! 22.¤c3 [ 5.d4 ¥xc4 9.£c1! ¤e4!? 16.£d7! 22..¤xh5 ¦g8 21.g5 .¥g7! … ¤e4 ] 15.h4 g4 11.¥a3 ¦e8 14.f6 ] 14.¤f4 ¤e4 16.¤d3! 15...¤xd5 ¤xd5 16.¦fe1 ¥f3!-+ ) 15.dxe5 11.. 5.¤h5 15.£g4! ) 20..¥xh6 ¥d6 28.£g3 ¥d6 13...¥xe4 £xd2 17..dxc5 Rauser.. 15.¢g1 ¥h6-+ ) 22.¥xd3 exd3-+ .¦c1= Stahlberg.RBernstein.¤b8 preventing Nxh5 ] 18.G-Flohr.¥e6 16.. 15.. the messenger came with the next report.d5 [ 10.¤fe2 f6 26.gxf5 ¦d8 21.' [ 18.¦ac1 exd4 ( 13.¤d3 15.¤e7 ¦c7 20.£d7 15..exd5 e4 ( 9.f4 ( 16.¢f1 Fischer.1963 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 59 King's Bishop's Gambit 1.1963 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 61 Ruy Lopez. Y ¤xa3 21.. he told his audience that there was obviously nothing left for Fischer to do but give up.¥xd7+ ¢xd7 12.. In a hall adjacent to the playing room..£c1 ¤e4 16..¥b3 0-0 8.hxg5 0-0-0= ) 11.¦xd2 ¤c4 18.£h3+ 23.¤d7 12.b3 ¥a6 12.f3 ¥h6 16.¤xe4 dxe4 ( 16.¤xe6 fxe6 22.¥a3 ¦e8 12. E) 14.£d3 ¤a6 12.....¦xd8 ¦exd8 23.V 'Rauzer' dxc5 14.¤f3 [ 7. Suddenly.dxe5 ( 11.£xe7 ¦xe7 35..P Curacao ct 1962 ] 12.£d7! '0-1 Byrne.L ch-USA 1963] 2.¢f1 d6 5.£d1 0-0-0 [ Possibly better is 13..R-Fischer.R-Keres.¥d2 £d5= ] 11.¦e1 b5 7.¤f4 e6 11.d5 ¤d8 11.¢f2 £f5!-+ ] 21.£xc2+.f4 ¦xd5! 18.bxc4 ( 20.¦xf8+ 1-0 Fischer..¤xe5 £xe5 14.0-0 ¥e7 6. 15.¤xd5 ¥xe2 17.¤xd3 ¥c3! 19.£b1! .¤e4 ¤xe5 13..¢xh2 ¤g4+ 17.¤xe4 dxe4 17.d4 ¥xh2+ 16..£d3 g5 9.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 21.£h3 £xh3 ¹11. Grandmaster Rossolimo was commenting on the games for a large audience.¤e3 g6 17.¤xd1 19.£xc4 c6 8.¤ge2 ¤c6 9.Nd5 +/=] 15..) 20.e5± ) 6.£g4 f5 21.¤f1 £e7 20.fxg4 ¦xc1 20.dxe5 [ 13.¤xd4 ¥b7+ 21..¢g1 ¤xe3 18.¤db5 £h3+ 23..¦ac1 £h3 23..d4 ¥xc4 8.¤xe4 dxe4 16.¥xe4 ¢h8! 18.¢g1 ¦e1+!! 24.£h4 ¦e8 14.¦d7 ¦c8 26..£c2± … ¦d2.¤xh3 ] 7.¤xf2! 16.

E Mar del Plata 1960 'FischerEliskases 1960'] 16..¤xe7+ £xe7± ^^ 21.¤d3 29.¥e3 ¢h7 28....¥xg3 ¢xg3 51.£h5 g6 10.¢e2 ¢g3 54.hxg6 ¦g8„ ] 26.] 25.¤f5+ gxf5 21.¥xd3 ¦xd3 22.g3 f3! 48.¥xc1 ¤d7³ 24.d6! ¤xd6 35..¢e3 ¢g4-+ .¥xg5 ¤f6 ( 18.¤g5! ] 19...a4 ¢f5 30..¤c3 This develops a piece with gain of .¦xd3 ¦xd3 36..¢g2 W e i n s t e i n ....c4 Kmoch /\Rd7.¥xh7+..¢e2 ¤e6 26.¥e1? [ 44.¤d6+ ¢e7 20..¤xa3 £e7 15.¥g1 ¤g5+-+ .exd4 Nxd4 =/+' 12.g5™ [ 26.¢f1 ¤f8 25.£xd7! [ 35.¦h1 gxh5? ( 27.¦xd3 £xd3 35.¤c3 e6 6.a5 [ 52.g3? fxg3 48..¤g5 ¥xg5 22.01.g5 ) 28.Aula 04 Variante 05 Luta do N contra o B mau Estrutura central d4-d5 # 10 1..¢e2 ( 49.exd5 ¤d8 33.£xh5 ¤f4+ 29./\ Kh3-g4-f5 ] 1-0 Saidy.d4 cxd4 4.Kmoch ) 31. a formula for an early demise.¦d2ƒ /\ Bc5 /\ 34.¢h2 ¥e6 20.¤b5 £b6 13..£c7 ¥d7 19..¥g1 ¢e2 55.¥xg3= .£e6± Kmoch .¦ad1 ( 33.h4! [ 17. d4 13.¥h2 f3 56.¥e3 f6 36.¥c4 ¥c5 4.¦d1 ¦d7 33..¤e3 c4 21..¦d2 ¦fc8 21.¥g3 ¤e3!-+ /\ 57..¥e3 ¥xd1 19.¦d2+¤a5 [ 31.a5 46.d4 d6 7.fxg4 ¤h6 44.¥a3 ¦f8 12.¤f3 d6 3.¥g1! ¢f5 ( 45.D-Reshevsky.¤e3² ] 17.c4! ¤d4 22.¤h5! 48.g3!= ) 49.a3 ¥xc3+ 8.¥b5+ c6 16.¥xh3 17. 17.¢e3 ¤e6 34.¢f1 ¤d2+ 51..¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦ad1+.¢h3+.] 30.. Nd5' ¤g7 [ ¹21..h6+!+.¤d4 ¤xd4 15.¤g5 A) 17.¦ed1 ¦ad8 ( 30..¢f2 ¤d8 32.¥xd3 cxd3? [ ¹29.. 27..¥xf1? 19.¢e2 ¢g6 37..¦g8 27.¦ad8 34. 16.. 48.£xd4 £xd4 16. 50.£f3 ¤e7 25.¦e1+ ¤e4 25.¢d2 ¤f1+-+ ) 49.fxg3 50...¢h2 Bronstein... 4.¤e3 c4= Kmoch ) 19.¥d2 ¢g6 33....¦xd7+ £xd7 23. 47.¦dd8 31..¢g4 49...¢f2 ¤f5 51.] 31.¦d2 bxc3 32...¥e3 ¦b8 26.£xc3 34.g4+? ) 48.My 160 Memorable Games 29 [ 16.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥e3 ¤f4+! 28.¥f2 ¤h4 52...¥c3 ¤e3 ] 50.¥h2 ¤g3 50.£g3 ¥xa3 14.b4 ¥xb4 5..¤xg4-+ 45.¢f1 f3 ] 52.¢d3 [ 50.¦d2 £c7 37.¦xd3 cxd3 ( 31.¥xg5 18.e4 e5 2.¢xf2 ¢e4-+ ) 48.ACQ ] 44.Anthony F Fischer..¤xd4 ¦xd4 23.exd5 ¦xd5 21.1964 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 68 English Opening Estratégia Carlos Alejandro Martinez .g6 [ ¹16.c4 c5 2..dxe5 fxe4 5.¥d2 [ 45..g5 >= ..£g4 1-0 C41 Fischer.¥g1 ( 48..¥xg5 f6 20.¢e2 ¤g3+ 50..h3 ¤f5 41..¥e1 ¤f6 47.¥xh4 ¢xh4 53..£c8+ ¤d8 33.¦ad1 cxb5 18..¦d5! ¦xd5 32.£xe5 ¤f6 11.Robert James USA-ch 6364 New York A33 2618 2629 02..¥e3± Fischer..¢e2 f4 39.R-Eliskases.¦fxd1 ¦c2 20.£f3! ¥xg4 [ 23.g3! ) 46..¤xc3 d5 9.>< d3 ] 32.¢e2 g5 31.¦d1 ¤f7 34.¥xf1 18.¢d3 ¢f5 35.¦xd3? 32.h4 h6 18..cxd5 exd5 11.¤f6 17.¦ad1 £f7 33.¥e6 18.¢f3 ¤h2+-+ ] 45.Robert James Celle Davies simul 1964 1.¥e2 ¥f5 '/\ 12.g4!= ( 49.¥b6! ] 34.£e6 ¢g7 35.¤g4 ¥xg4 24.£xa6 ) 32..exf5 ¦ac8 22...¢f3 ¢f5 47.¥xf6 gxf6 20.¤h5 23...¥c5 ¦d8 36.¥xb3 cxb3 26.¦xe4+ ¢f6 26.bxc3 £a3 33.£e6+ ¢g7 28.¤d5! £b7 [ 19.£a4 ¦b4? 27.¥e3 ¥d3 21....¥f2 ¤g7 40..¥h4 [ 47..¤e3 £f7 24. d5 6.f3 ¢g6 29.¥xd5 20..0-0 ¤g4 13..exf6 £xf6 32.¦xd1 31.c4 19.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥xc5² Komch ) 20.¢d3 f5 38.h4! ( 19.¤c4 £e6 17.e3 0-0 10.d4 f5 Black opens up his kingside while he's behind in development.¥b6 ¦b8 34.c3 ¥e7 6.0-0 a6 14.¦xd1 ¦d8 32.e5! ¦g7 31.£xh5 ¥xg5 19..£xd7 ¦fd8 27.dxe5 ¤xe5 8.¦f8 24.g5 26.¢xf1± .¥e3 [Fischer] ¤c5? 26.gxf6 21.¦c8? 33.¤g5 Threatening Black's e-pawn and preventing 5.¦xd7 ¦e6 37.¤g4 c4 [ 22.¢c3 ¢f3 54.E 'Eliskases' 25.£f3+.£xb5 c4 Eliskases.£e6 ¤e8 38.¥g1? ¤g7 49.hxg4 hxg4 43...gxf4? gxf4µ /\ Rg8..¥h2 ( 47.h5? [ ¹25.¤e3 f6 [ 18.¤f5 51.¥d1 ¥c2 18.¢h8! [ 25.¦c1 ¦xc1+ 23.¢e2 ¤xg4 45.¢g2! [ 26.£xd7! £xd7 36.hxg5 ¤a5 23.b3 £d6 [ 32.b4 31.¢xg3 ¢e4! ) 47..g3' ¤f6 47.a5! ( 48.. fxe3] 28..¢d3 h5 27..£e6 ! Kmoch ) 33.¥f2 ¤e4 48.g3! g6 19.¦xc2 ¦xc2 22.¥h2 ¤e6 50.f6+ ¤xf6 24.¥e6 20.¥xf6! ( 20.¥e3 ] 26.Rad8] 22..¢f3 '/\ 47.¥xd8 ) 19. 48.¦ad8 32.cxb5 axb5 24.¤e3 >< d5 ] 24..¦xd8+ £xd8 33.a4± Kmoch ] 23.£xg4 ¤e6 25.¥xc5 £xc5 27.¦ad1 ¦e8 [ 33.¤db5 ¥b4 7.¢e2? ¤xf2 49. dxe5...¤h2 /\ Nh2-...¤xg2 53. Nf5 -+ 0-1 C51 Fischer.¢f5 46..¢g3 50.¥c5 ¦bd8 35.¦xd3 £xd3 35..£f7+.¢g5 49.¦ed1 ¦d7 [ 30..¢d3 g4 42.e4 e5 2.¦xd3! ] 33.Robert James Chaney Houston (simul) 1964 1.-d5 '/\.¦xd8 £xd8 39.¤xe5 dxe5 9.g3? .S Zürich ct 1953.¥xf4 exf4 30.. B) 17.¥e1 ¢g4 49..Bc5 +.¢f1 f3-+ ..] 27.¤h5 48.. R] 17. 30.¢e2 ¢f5 46..¦xd3 30.a4! ¦b8 17..¢e2 ¢xg2-+ ] 47.¤e3 ¥e6 .exd4 ¦ac8 17.£xg4 ¤b3 25.£e8+ ] 20.axb5 axb5 18.¢h2! [ 28.

Qh6 ¥e7 Black doesn't want to gain a tempo after 6.fxe5 4.Nxf6 White Fischer. 5. b5 out of c4.d4 mate. ¥b4+ If White interposes on d2 Fischer..¤f3 ¤c6 3.¤h4 ¤ce7 11.e6 This wins at least the exchange.. 1-0 The diagonals intersect at e4..¥xc3 d6 10.. 13.e4 e5 2.£b3 White should play 7.£e4 g6 15..¥xf6 1. Black should play 6. ¤h6 8... 0-0 9.Bd3 threatening 7.¥c4 £e8 8.. £e8 This loses by cutting off a possible escape square for Black's king. 13. and a path to h7 on another diagonal. Nxd5. ¤c5 By cutting his bishop off 5.¥xf6 ¥xf6 White to move and win.¥h6+ 1-0 1.Nxg7 and Simultaneous Exhibition 1964 15. 1.Rxf6 or 15.¢d1 Now that W te's king is stuck in the center Black show sacrifice a pawn by 6.. but now the pin o n t h e k n i g h t w i l l b e c o m e u n p l e a s a n t .¤xf6+ ¤xf6 7. ¥xb4 4. 6.e5 ¤e4 5.0-0 Boatner White threatens 13.d4 d5 3. 8..fxe5 ¤c6 3.£e2 White tries to prove Black's knight is misplaced. exd6 f5.¤xh8 Black has no appetite for 9. The text lets Black defend by 7.¥d3 ¥e7 8.c3 £xc5 7.¥g5 d3 Black's best try.Qxe5+ Kf7 6. 1-0 3.dxc5 £a5+ 11.exf6 gxf6 If 5..cxd3 f6 9.¤c3 C51 Now White threatens 9..e4 e5 2.. since Black can't do anything to keep the knight out of f7.¤f3 ¤gf6 6.¥xf7+ ¢f8 10. 6.Peter king Black will have two exposed minor pieces.Nxh8 10.. ¤e7 5. since 8.¥c4 Now Black will be unable to castle.£e2 from the kingside Black lets his queen get trapped.£xa8 b4 16.dxe5.£h6+ as he would after 5.0-0-0 Here Black makes a big mistake.Nh4 Ne7 10. C43 Qxe5+ or his king after 4..Rxf4 followed by 14.c4 Fischer.Qh4 leaves Black's knight awkwardly placed..d4 d6 This is a ¢g8 17. 7...¥g5 c5 10.£h5+ Chalker Simultaneous Exhibition 1964 ¢f8 7.Robert James 1-0 Gloger Simultaneous Exhibition 1964 1.Ke7 5. but not good enough..f4 f6 After this Black is almost lost.£h5+ ¤g6 5. when he will end up two Simultaneous Exhibition pawns down with his king still exposed.g6 6.Nd5..¥h5 Black can only stop 1964 the mate on f7 by 10. when he must lose at least another exchange.Robert James doesn't work as Black will come out a piece down.e4 e6 2.My 160 Memorable Games 30 tempo.exf6+ N o w t h e r e i s a p a t h t o t h e r o o k a t a 8 o n o n e ¢f7 10..¥xh6 Now 8.e4 With Black having weakened his kingside White shifts into gambit mode and plays for attack..c3 Black can't take the bishop because of 14.g7 mistake. 6.exf5 d5 15. C10 f5 or 5. 7. if he moves his Kral.Robert James Black will take over the initiative.¤f3 ¤f6 3.g6 5. Simultaneous Exhibition 1964 6.b4 ¥xb4 5.b4 White grabs space on the queenside and prepares to fianchetto his bishop.Na5 C30 Fischer. Qh5+ gives Black the unhappy choice of losing a rook after 4..d4 ¥e7 5. 4.Na5 to neutralize 1-0 White's bishop.Qh5+.f4 White offers another pawn to open his queen bishop's diagonal.¤f5 ¢f8 12.¥b2 f6 .Bc5.¤c3 dxe4 4. Play this out against Gambit if you don't see why. 1.¤f3 Threatening to attack the pinned knight by 8. Jones gxh6 9. ¤e7 Blocking in his whole kingside.d4 exd4 4..e5 and 8. we would have a double attack. Bxf7+ is no good.e4 e5 2.. 3. A00 14. exf4 7. Bc4+. If the White queen occupies that square.. e5 2.Na5.¤c6+ diagonal.¤e5+ ¢e6 11.d5.¤f7 £f6 9.would lose a pawn for shaky c o m p e n s a t i o n .Robert James 9.d5 7. keeping White's queen 12..Nh4. ¤g6 8. ¥xf5 14. 1-0 Black blocks the bishop's diagonal but weakens his kingside.Bxf6. ¥xc3 Fischer..Robert James plays 6.fxg6 gxf6 16.¤xe4 ¤d7 with complications.¥c4 ¥c5 4. ¤c6 8.

0-0 ¥e7 8.Robert James Nyman Simultaneous Exhibition 1964 1.¥f4 cxb2 15..¥xd6 ¦xe1 14. this just misplaces another Blackstone. 20..¢xh2 ¤f4 15.¤g5 ¤a6 16.£g5+ White lacks.¦d2 ¦d7 36.exf5 gxf5 Another pot ential target.£xe4 ¥d6 13. 19..Robert James weakness of the f file. ¥d7 15.¦ab1 Hoping to ge t something on the queenside.¥xf4! £h4+ 16.d4 cxd4 4. 12. ¤e5 11.£xf7?? [ ¹12.£b3 In this standard line of the Evans Gambit White plays for pressure a g a i n s t f 7 t o c o m p e n s a t e f o r h i s p a w n .Qe8 12.e4!? 12...£d7+ ¢b8 22.f5 b4 11. since he can B86 gain time attacking White's pieces.¤f3 ¤c6 3..Robert James Burger.d3 ( 13. White takes the bishop and will mate by Nf7+.c3 b5 7.¦xg6 0-1 1-0 .g3 ¥g7 4. f5 16.¥xb5+ ¢d8 10.¤g5 This just loses time. ¤e8 Now if either knight moves to e4.£d8+ ¢a7 37.f4 ¥xf4 14.¥xd6 ¤c6 22.¤h4 Since White can't follow up with f4 due to the Fischer. the only defense to the threatened discovered check. f4 This does ¤g4 14.¥d3 ¢d7 15.Robert James Sugerman Simultaneous Exhibition E67 1964 1.¤f3 ¤e6 15. 10.£c5+ ¤e7 25.¥c4 ¥c5 4..£g6 White must have thought this ¢f8 24.¥xa8 £a7 18.Kh8.. ¤g5 The winning move.John Unites States simul 1964 piece.dxe4 £xb5 19.¦xb2 £xc4 swift.d3 £e5 15. 1-0 C57 Fischer. 13.£xb7?? ( 15.¥d5 ¤xd4 weaken the light squares.¥g3 £g5 18.e4 e5 2.¤f6 [ 12.¦d6+ ¢c8 35.¢h1 ¤b5 19.d4 exd4 7.¥f1 ¤xd5 8.f5 is strong.d3 £f5 15.¥xd7 ¥xd7 21.e4 e5 2.0-0 exd4? [ 11.f3 ( 13.gxf4 penetrate to f2.¥d5 14.£c2 c6 10.Ke7 13.¢g1 ¤e2# ] 12. Pietzsch hopes to get light square play.£f3 ¥b7 11..¥h3 a6 6.Be6 would lose to 15 Ng5.0-0 d6 8.e4 c5 2..¥xh2+ ( 13.g3 ¥d5 14.Robert San Francisco sim 1964 1..¥f4 ¦c8³ ) 15.d4 ¤bd7 7...¦d1 £e7 11. so Pietzsch tries something else.Nxh7+ Ke7 13.¤c3 18.¦bf2 ¤g6 31.¥xd5 ¤f6 5.¥xg8 ¦xg8 11.0-0 ¥xc3 8.¥c4 £b6+ Black should trade queens and live with a slight disadvantage after White takes on f4.¥c4 d5 4.¥d4 ¥g4 24.cxd4 £xg5 9.¤f3 0-0 7.) 13.¥d2± ] 12. ¥b6 This loses--Black gives back the pawn for no reason and lets his king get pushed around.f4 b5 all White's pieces with tempo.Bg5+ 1-0 Pietzsch.e4 e5 2.£xd5+ ¤xd5 16..¢g1 ¥xe4 17.£h4+ 16.. 9.¤g5 This double a t t a c k a g a i n s t f 7 a n d h 7 w i n s m a t e r i a l . Fischer now hits 1.¤f6 13.d3 £e5 13.¥c4 e6 7.¥c4 ¤f6 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.. then .¦fc1 ¦e8 21. £f7 17... but he soon finds the position opening up to his disadvantage..¦xf6+ ¢e7 pieces hanging.¤c3 ¥b4 6. exf4 23.b4 ¥xb4 5.£e1 ¦e8 12.¦xf6+ gxf6 32.£xh8 ¥b7 29. so it should stick to f3.¦xf7 After 16. but this is too slow.Bg5+ Kd7 12.¦axe1 For his queen White has a huge lead in development and threats against f7.¥g5 that in the end something must drop.e5 £c6 move got him out of trouble. White has too many 30.£xf7+ ¦xf7 Otherwise Black will trade on g3 and 33.¢h1 ¤xe4 11. and it's no surprise 10.¥g2 0-0 5.¥xf7+ ¢f8 10. h6 14.c4 g6 3.e4 ¤c7 Eyeing the new weakness on d4.f4 exf4 3.¤c3 £xb2 20. but such considerations 17.¥xe7+ ¢xe7 23.My 160 Memorable Games 31 C33 Fischer..¦e1?! c6 14. but punishment is 27.¥b3 £c7 9.Qxg8+ or his queen after 12.£d8+ ¢xf7 28.¥e3 The bishop is now a target for f7-f5-f4.exf7+ ¢f8 13. but just misplaces another piece.Wolfgang Fischer.¤f3 ¤f6 2.h3 ¦b8= ) 14.dxe5 dxe5 9.¤c3 e5 8.c4 are of lesser importance than king safety.£d2 £xa8 20..dxc3 c6 9..£c7 ¤f6 26.£b6+ ¢a8 38.Robert James Havana 1965 1.£xh7+ ¢d8 34.f4 £f5-+ ] 0-1 C52 Fischer.h4² .¥xf4 ¤d6 13.fxe6 bxc3 12. Ke8 13.¦b1 ¤c6 16...¤c3 ¦b8 15.¤f3 d6 3.¤f3 ¤c6 3. which ¤a7 21.c3 ¥a5 6.£xd5+ £xd5+.£e2= ) 13. 13.0-0 d6 6. Black gets the initiative right away on the kingside.¤g5 d5 5.exd5 ¤d4 6..£h5 14.¤xh7+ Black loses a rook after 12.. The night can't stay on e4. Now 14.

¢f3 ¦xd5 71.¦h1 /\ 27.bxc3 14.a3 a6 13...g4 when his e-pawn Posições diversas # 5 3/46 1.¤e3 [ 36.£xd6! ¤cxe4 ( 33.¤c3 a6 6.¦c7+ ¢e8 67.h3 18.bxc5 bxc5 22.d5 a5 12..0-0 0-0 5.¦xf7+!+.¦f7+ ¢e8 61..£e2 b5 s q u a r e s a r o u n d W h i t e ' s k i n g a r e w e a k .¥f1 ¤f8 16.James Fischer.¦xf7+ ¢xf7 36.£b2+ ¢f7 0-1 Sherwin.¦e6+ ¢d7 53.¤f1 [ 30.¥xf4 exf4 47.b4 ¥d7 17.¦f3 ( 32.£c6 £xd2 31.bxa5 ( 33.c4 g6 2.¤xe4 ¦xe6 White has nothing for his piece and a6 25.e5 dxe5 68.¦a6 ¦a3 91.Arthur Bernard do anything anywhere on the board Black prepares Fischer.¤c3 e5 8.¤b1 [ 26..£c2 ¤e8 19.¥b3 b5 8..¢f2 ¥c6 80.£c7! ¤c5 33. 0-1 ¥e7 9. ¤bd7 12.d3 ¥g7 9.g4 ¤f6 37..£xe5 ¦e8 35.f3 White worries about the weakness of his e-pawn.¦h7+ ¢f8 64.£xe5+ ¢g8 36.¤bd2 ¥g7 8.¤e3!? ] 13.¤f3 ¤c7 fxe6 20.¦a8 ¥b5 76.h3 V a r i a n t e 0 4 L u t a d o B b o m c o n t r a o B m a u White doesn't want to allow .My 160 Memorable Games 32 E61 Burger.¤c3 ¤xg4+ 39.¢g2 ¥f4 45.Raa1] 26.h3 an attack on his king as well.£xf8+ ¢xf8µ ] 36.¦a3 ¥h6 22.¦ff1 ¥e8 26.d4 £e7 9.¦ac1 ¢h8 With White unable to Bisguier.¤b1 ¦f3 43.¦f7+ ¢e6 73.¤fd7 34.£xg4 ¤d6!= .bxc3 what he could have done.Carlos Alejandro Martinez .¦a6 a4 Fischer.£e6+ ¢g7 37.e4 c5 2.¥e3 ¤d7! ] 6.¥h3 ¦cb8 21.g3 g6 3.¦xb6 ¥f6 24...¦xc5 ¢d7 69.£xb6? ¤cxe4 .¤c4 and .¥g2 d6 5. 30. but Black takes over the initiative after this.h4 ¤c5 20.¥b3 c4 22.¤f3 d6 3.¢e3 ¢e6 75.b4! ¤b7 30..fxe4 ¤e8 35.¥g2 ¥g7 4.e3 ¤f6 6.¤a4 ¥c7 31.0-0 0-0 10.¦c6 ¦a5 70.g4 coming and panics.¥e3 ¦f8 42.¦xc6+ ¢f5 90.¥d2 ¥d8 26.¦b7+ ¢d8 50.¤f3 ¤f6 2..¥c2 ¥g4 6.¦g8 ¢f7 78.axb5 £f8 19.¤f3 d6 will become hopelessly weak and Black will have 3.a4 ¤e8 17.¢f2 a5 83.¤d5 [ 43.¤ge2 0-0 7.¤d2 ¦g3+ 55.¥e3 0-0 10.¤ce2 ¦g8 16..¥e3 ¦eb8 24..0-0 c6 8.¦e1 ¦e8 11.£xb4 ¤c5 35.¥d3 ¤c6 5.d6 £xd6 41.¤d2 ¦h8 28.¤xd4 ¤f6 95.¢g7 27.¦b7+ ¢e8 48.c4 ¤bd7 7.£b7 ¥a5 28.¤g3 ¥xc4 60.¢f1 ¢f4 94.. .¦f8 33.¢h1 Getting off of the g-file in case Black forces it open.£xb7 ¤xe4 32.¦b8 ¦d3+ 79..£xc8 ¥xc8 29.¦f2 ¥b5 19.¥xe4 ¤f6 33.¦e1 ¥xb5 18.¢g2 ¦xa3 58.¤g3 ¦ag8 19.¢g2 ¤f6 26.¤xe6 White sees ..Robert James New York US-ch Black is ready to resume his attack.¦f3 axb4 32.¦xf6? [ 33.£xb6 £xb4µ ) 32.¤h2 b5 11.h3 £b6 10.h5.Robert James New York ch-US 1966 1.¢f1 Havana Olympiad 1966 ¦c3 88.¤g4 34.¦b2 f5 20.¦f6 ¥h5 54.£xd6+ ¢g7 35.¤e3² ] 33.¦b1 21.¢h2 ¦eb8 18.¦xf4 ¥e2 59. 33. ¦g6 11..£b8+ £f8 38.dxe4 ¤xe5 16.¦f6 ¦d6 72.d3 [ 6.¦eb1 £c8 21. g5 17.¤cd7 34...£c2 ¦e8 10.¢h1 a2 5.¥g5 £xd1+ 20. 33.¦b8+ ¢f7 46.¦c8 ¢f7 66.¦xb8 '?' .Aula 05 diagonal of Black's queen bishop.¦h1 ¦h7 29.. but moving onto the Estratégia .£c7 .d4 cxd4 4.¦b1 £c7 14.f3 ¤xe4 34.¦f7 ¢e8 51. but it is hard to see d5 'N!?' 13.Robert James 84.gxh6 £xh6 25.£xf3 g6 8.¥d3 ¤d7 30.¤f1 ¦f3+ 57.0-0 0-0 10.¦xd1 ¦fe8 White's bishop ends White's hope of counterattack.¦d1 £e7 43.. USA-ch New York 1966 15.e4 c6 9.¦ah8 31.£d4 f5 40.cxd5 b6 14..¥g5 ¥xg5 23.¦b8+ ¢d7 49.¤d2² ) 34.e4 ¤bd7 11..Rh6 ¥d7 '!' 9.g5 ¥g4 41.¢g1 e4 1.¤b1 ¥d8 38..£xb6 £xb4µ ) 33.c3 ¤f6 4.g6 7.d4 d6 6.¤e2 ¦c4 85..¥c2 ¤e6 23. 21.¤c3 ¥g7 3.£c5 44.£d2 ¤e5 B50 13.h3 cxd5 13...¢f2 ¦d3 56.¦b6 ¦xb6 23.£f2 £c7 14. to stop Black's attack.¦b3 ¥g3+ 44.£e8+ £f8 37.¦b6 Soruco Garcia ¦f3+ 81.¤e5 '?!' [ 13. but now the dark ¥xf3 7.£b3 ¥c7 27.¢g1 a3 93.¦b2 ¤g7 25..¢f2 ¤d8 27.hxg4 ¥xh4 40.Robert James to take the initiative on the kingside as well.0-0 ¥b7 11.¤ec3 ¦ec8 16.¢g1 e3 97. dxe4 15.¥c4 e6 7.¤e3 ¤xe4 35.¤h4 fxe4 32.£c4+ ¢g7 42...¢f1 ¢f3 96..¢xf6 34.¦xh7 ¥d3 62.¤b5 ¥a6 15.¦h8+ ¢e7 63.¦f8 ¢e7 B87 77.£a2 ¦xh3 45.f4 b4! 12.e4 c5 2.¦a5 ¦b2 100.¦a7 ¢d5 74.¦a6 ¦xg3 89.¦e5 a1£# The beginning of some very passive play by White.a3 99.¢g2 ¦c3+ 82.g3 e5 4.¦a7 ¦c2+ 87. 33.¥e3 b6 15.¦h8+ ¢g7 65..¥xf5 ¦h2+-+ ] 43..£g7 37.£d4 ¦d8 36.fxe5 ¤e8 17.d5 c5 12. 0-1 1965 E69 1.¦e5 ¦g2+ 98.¦f6 ¢e7 52.¤g3 ¢e6 86.¥xe6 ¤xe4 This discovered attack on 18.¦a5 ¦a2 92.£xa5³ ] 30.hxg5 h6 24.¤c3 ¥a5 36.f4 b4 '!' 12.Karl Fischer.£xb6 ¤xe4 39.

S/Santa Monica Piatigorsky /1966/) 8.£xe4 £d7? … ¤b8-c6-a5: × c4 Diagram [ 11.¦xb8 28.e3 ¥xc3+! 8...0-0 ¦c6! 18.bxc3 £xf2+ 11.£g4 ¦f5!= Gligoric..¢d5 ¦g5+ 51.¥g5 h6 A) ¹11.£e2 ] ...R/USA-ch/1965) 10.a 5..¥c2 ¥d7 53.¥xd3 Reshevsky.¦b6+ ¢e7 48.¦a7 ¦e7 32.cxd5 ¥xf1 9. ' [ 6.£xe8+ ¦xe8+ 18.¢xd2 ¦e2+-+ Saidy..¥d3 f5 13.¦c1 c6! 15.¥xg4 e4 73.0-0 ¦fe8! 15.£h4= -.¢xg3 ] 61.¦e7+ ½-½ Bronstein..e5 52..hxg5 ¢g7 39..0-0 ¥xc3 ( 7.¤a3 £e7! 14..d5 ¢f7 33.b6 5.B/ Habana/1967/ 12.bxc3 e5= Fischer ] 4..¢f2 ¢e6 35.b5 ¥b7 14.£a4+.¥e2 exd5 10.¤a5µ Portisch ] 12.N/URS-ch/1967] 6.¢d4 ¢e8 57.¢c5 ¦a3 42. ' ¤bd7 12.¥b1 ¤h8 56.e5 ¤e4 12.¦a3 ¦h7 30..¥xf1? 10..V/WchMoscow/1954) 7.b4 ¤e7 13.1966 Nimzo-Indian.¤g2 ¢g7 58.¦fd1 ¥b7 19.B/ Moscow/1967..¥e2 dxc4 11.A-Fischer.. ¹8.¤xe4? h5 .hxg5 ¤xe4 14.¤d2 ¥xc3 10.£xf6 gxf6 14.bxc4 ¤a5 12.¥b2 ¤d5µ Evans.e4 £c6µ ..a4 e4 74.¥f5 [Se 71.¢f2 ¢g5 59.¢g1 ¢d6 64..¥xf6 ¦xf6 26.¥d3 [ ¹13.a3 ¥e8 43.¢g1 ¥c6 68.¤xd4? 9..¦d2 ¤xc3 20....) 9.g4 h6 30.£d7? ''?' Ftacnik.¤d2!? ] 27.¦e1 f5 35.¥d3! d5 ( 8.e5 ¦xg2 52.¦a3 g5 26.ƒ ] 12.¢g1 ¢b6 66.c 6 .¢f4 ¤c5 41..a3 ¥xc3+ ( 6.¦e7+ ¢f8 58..¥b1 ¤g5 54.¤d7 12.e4 ¦a4+ 45.cxd5 ¤xg3 15.axb6 axb6 31.£c2 ¦ad8 18.¥a6 [ 5.hxg3+? 61..h4!‚ ¥b7! A1) 12.dxc5 ¥xf3 22.¤ed5 14.L/Budapest 1961/EXT 98 (59) ] 9.cxd5 exd5 10.0-0 ( 13.¢h1 ¥b7 69.¥g5 '?' ¥xg5+ 38..¤xe5! ''!' Ftacnik.a3± Portisch.£c2 ¥xf3! ( 9...a3 ) A) 7..¥g5 ¤b7 36.R/USA-ch/ 1965'' 20.¦e3 ¦xh2 24.¦b3 f6 27.¦e1 ¥e4 23.¥f3 e3 ] 73.¤h5 £h4! ) 13.¦xc8+ ¢g7 32.¦c8 ¦xc8 31.¢c1 ¦xf2 21. B) 11.g4 ¢d2 [ 74.¥xa6 ¤xa6 11.¤xe4 ¤xe4 11.£c2 ¥b7 7.e4!? [ ¹9.¦xb6 f3 0-1 Saidy.exd5 ¥xc3+ 11.¦ac1 c6 18.0-0 7.0-0 c5 13.¤f4 d5 8.¢d2 f4 34.¤ge2 [ 5.¥c2 h4 ] 57..exd4 ¦fc8 17.¥d3 ¥b7 6.f3 ( ¹7.b3 0-0 9.¤f5 ( 13.¢xc3 74.¥xb5 ¢xc3 73.¥xc3+ Taimanov.d5?? 7..¢xg6 58.f4 ( 15.¦1c2 g6 29.¤e4!? 6. ' 15.£xd8 ¤xc4+ 17.¦b1 ¦b5 '!' 29.g3 ¥b7 22.¤b5 c6 13.0-0 [ 8..¤d4 e6 34.¤xc3 d5 8.£xd5 ¦e8! ''!' Ftacnik.B h6 5.¢g1 ' #' ¥xe4 '!' '!!' 70.] 71.¤f4+ ¢xg5 49..¤f6+!!+Spassky.¤h5!? ¤bd7! ( 12.a4 h5 25.¦e8 13.¢xf2 ¥a6!= … ¤ b 8 .¢d4 e5+ 52.¢h1 ¢a5 67.e4 ¤c6 ( 7.¦e7+ ¢f8 54.¢e4 ¦a4+ 37.£f3 £a5 21.0-0-0 ] 13.¥d3 ¤a5 15.¥d7 ¢d2 75..¢xf1 £xd5 10.£xa8? ¤c6 13..¥a3 ¦e8 17.d5 d6 9.£e1 ¦d3 25.A-Fischer.gxf3 c5÷ ] 5.d5 d6 7.¥f4 h5 35.¦d3 ¤d6 20.S-Larsen.¥d3 ¤f6 13.a4 ¤c6 A) 10.cxd5 exd5 ( 9.Lajos Fischer.¤e2 ¤b2 45..a5 £c7 17.g5 e3 76.d4 ¤f6 2.¢d2 g5 32. ' 16.£f5 ¤f6 23.¢d2 75.¥a3? dxc4! 9..£h4+ 9..¤a4 44.0-0 7.L-Fischer.¤d4 ¤d1 46.d5 ) 8.¥d6 c5 22.¦a7 ¦d2+ 55.08...£c2 c5 15.My 160 Memorable Games 33 [ 27.¥f6 ¥h6+ 37.¢e3 ¢g6 40..hxg3 £xd5 16. 6.¥b2? dxc4 11.M-Levin.¤f3 A) 6.W-Fischer.c4= Fischer ] 9.d6 cxd6 38.¤e2 ¤f2 'N!' 47.g4!² Botvinnik.¢f2 ¢c5 65.¤g3 [ 6..¦a7 ¢e8 59.¢g1 ¢f6 62.¥d2? ''?' Ftacnik.¢xf1 exd5 10.£a4+ ] 7...Robert James Piatigorsky-Cup 2nd 03.a5 h4 28..¤g2 f6 50.¢h2 h3 '!' [ 60.dxe4! [ 9.dxe6! ) 10.exf6 ¢xf6 51.cxd5 ¥xd3 10.¤xc3! 8.£xd3 exd5 11.£f3!? [ 8.¢d5 ¦a3 38.¢d5 ¦a3 40.f6+ ¢d7 50.£d3 Gligoric-Portisch/Malaga/1961/] 8..¥f3 ¤d5µ Addison.¤xc3 ( 8..¦c2 ¢f6 33.R/USA-ch/1965 ''-+' Ftacnik.¤h4 [ 51.f4 ¦a3 34.¦b1 ¤c6!µ ) 8.R/USA-ch/1965.R/New York 1965/MCL (38)] 10.¢d1 ¤xd2 19..¢h2 ¢e7 63.¥h6+ ¢e7 18.¢d4 ¦a4+ 39.c4 e6 3.¥xc3+! '!?' ''!' Ftacnik.LSpassky.¥xg4 c3 resulta decisivo.¥xe4 fxe4 9. Rubinstein Variation La Pasion del Ajedrez 22 1.bxc3 ¤bd7 12.£f3 £d5 10.h4 g4 33.0-0 ¦e8 13.£e2 £c8 12.¥b1 [ 43.hxg5? 13. B) 7.¥g5 Spassky. A2) 12.e5 ¤d5 13.¥xh7 ¤xc4 16.¦xb5 axb5 30.£xa8? [ ¹14. ' 9.¢e4 ¦e2+ 56.£xf8+ ¢xf8™ 14.¢g2 h4 60.0-0 0-0 13.dxc5 bxc5 25. B) 6.¦b7+ ¢e8 53.D-Portisch..¥e5 ¦c6 24..¢e2 h6 31..¥xc4 ( 15..¢d4 ¢e6 44.¥f4 ) 15.¥c6 ¢b3!! 72.¥a3! ¦e8 12.£xd2 ¦d8 24.A-Fischer.¦b7 g3 37..¥xf6 £xf6 13.f5 14.¤e4! 7.¢c5 ¦a3 46.¥c2 ¤f7 55.¥b1 ¢h6 59.¢b3 72.¥h4 c5 6... B) 10.£a4ƒ Portisch.¤xg6 [ 57.bxc3 d5 8.g3 ¥d7 42.¥f3 b5 16.. 12.0-0² ) 13..0-0 g6 17.£e2 ¤b8 12.gxh4 ¦xh4 29.bxc3 ¥d6! 9..¢d4 ¦a4+ 41.¢d5 ¤g1! ] 51.B ).0-0-0 c5 ) 15.¦xc5 ¦a6 28....£e2 ¤c6 14.e3 [ 4.¥a3 [ 12.¤xc3! ¹ 8.¦e2 a5 43.c4 g4 36.¦c2 ¤d7 19..M-Smyslov.£xc3 c5! 21.¥e7 7..¢e3 ¤h3 48..¤e2 ¤d3+! ] 43.R/USA-ch/ 1965 ] 6.bxc3 ¥e4 9.¢f3 ¢f6 36.f5 ¦xg4 49.¥xe4 ¢a4 71. Ftacnik: 'Bronstein-Portisch/Budapest/1961'' ¤xa6 11.. Ftacnik: 'Saidy.exf5 14.¦fd1 £d5 19....¥g4 c3 ] 0-1 E45 Portisch.c5 8.¥c2 ¤g6 57...c4 ¤e4 14..0-0 f5 ( 7.£xc5 £xc5 27.¥xc4 .LReshevsky.e4 ¤c6³ × c3.dxc5 ¤xc5 14.¥xa6± Bronstein-Portisch/Budapest/1961 ''±' Ftacnik.dxc4!? 10.£f2 ¥xc3+ 10. c4 ) 8...¦fc1 ¦ac8 20.cxd5 F ¥xf1 9..¤c3 ¥b4 4.gxf3 ¦xd2 23.¦b2 ¦g3 47.bxc3 ¥xc3 9..¥xh3 [ 73.¥g5+ ¢f8 ..S-Fischer.bxc3 0-0 11.¦f3 ¤f5 21.¥e2 cxd4 16.

¥e3 0-0-0³ Malesic.gxf3 f6 12..¤g5² ).¤e3! 29. 6. C) 7.¦1xe3 [ 29.¦4e2 f3! 29. Tratemos das piores.£xf3² Schallopp-Blackburne/Frankfurt/1887/ '?' '+/-' 'com confortável maioria de peões na ala do rei.¢h2 a6 [ 26. A..¥e6 11..¥c1 ¥xc4 19..¢xg1 ¥c5-+ 'Hort.¦e2 '?' [ 22.bxc6 5.S/ Maribor/1967/0-1/33/' 'etc..S-Reshevsky.Bg4 / Schallopp-Harmonist/Frankfurt/1887/ 6. As pretas poderão defender o PK de diversas maneiras.d4 apresentaria menos problemas do que o lance do texto.£a4! 18..fxe3 30.¥xf5? £a4-+ ] 18.hxg5 34. '.d4 exd4 7..¤c6-+ 15...) 8. em vez de 8.¢f7 25....¦e1 Um exemplo: ( 8. 5.. .¤c3 ¥d7 10.f6 '!' '"Esta situação é pouco encontrada nas partidas atualmente jogadas e.¤d4± 'Malesic.£c6 24.¦g1 £f2-+ Fischer ] 29.. C2) 8. dxc6 'Esta jogada é tão automática que quase ninguém a comenta.' [ 5. um imediato 5...hxg4 9.£b3? ¥xf3 9.e4 e5 2.h4 e5! 23.¢h2 g6 12.¥xc4 [ 18..' [ 5.£xe8+ £xe8µ 16...¦e4 fxg2-+ … ¤d2 ) 29.dxe5 ¥xf3 8.d3 f6 7.L-Fischer..¢h2 ¦xg1 14..¥xc4 ¤xc4 20.¥e5? [ 23.¤d4 £f6 11.£f5 9..0-0 ¤a5 17.g5 9.¢xg2 c5+-+ 'N' 'uma velha armadilha')] 5. Embora trocando o bispo pelo cavalo e um bispo que usualmente desempenha funcões estratégicas importantes nesta abertura.g3 £e7µ Analyse Keres '!' 'com vantagem') C1) 8..£d6!? A) 6.S/Maribor/1967/0-1/33/ '?'.dxe5 fxe5 8.¤bd2 ¥e6 9..¥xf3 7. f3.¥f2 … ¦e1= Portisch] 23.¥xc4 £xc4-+ ) 18..¤xe5 ¥d6! 10. Horowitz Bobby Fischer: A Welter of Winning Possibilities Ruy Lopez Inf.¥e3 c5 8.Tfb1.£xf3 A partida HortKolarov.gxf3 £a4-+ × a2.¥g5 '!' £g6 8.£xd4 '|^' 'as brancas mantêm iniciativa duradoura. C) 6.0-0 '!' '#"Para as pretas.¥b4 ( 18...b4 '?' '=' 'As brancas têm possibilidades de irromper na ala da dama após a3 seguido de Rfb1 e b4. confirmando mais uma vez a opinião de Nimzovich que disse que ameaça é mais forte que sua execução.¤f3 ¤c6 3..¥xf3 10.hxg4 ( 8. B) 6.£xb7 ¢d7 10.¥xc6! 'Surpresa! Utilizei esse lance em partida anterior contra Portisch (ver nota sobre o sexto lance das pretas)...¦fe1 ¤e4 23...¤xd4 etc.¦e5! ) 10...hxg4? hxg4 9.h3 h5 '!?' ( 6.¦fe1 [ 24.f4 g4 25.'... c3. .f4 ¤d2! 25.dxc5 [ 20. 5.¤h3 £h4 11.¦e1 '!' ( 9.e5 25.£e2 0-0-0= Der weisse Plan: a3.¥b5 a6 4. XVII 1966 All About Chess..b4' 11.¥a3 ( 10. .¦e4 £d5! 28.'.¤c4² ' ? ' ' e t c ..£xf3 exd4 9.¦f3+ [ 31.f3! ( 24.. 10.¤f3 £xe4 8.d4 exd4 6. Observando Gligorich.¦e4 gxh4-+ ] 31.d3? como na partida Malesic..¤bd2! '?' ( 8.bxc5 21.¥xe5 ¤xe5 24. ¤ e 4) 24..¦f8+ ¢d7 35.¥c1 c5! 20...d4 g4 11. como na partida Schallopp.e5 £g6 8...£d8 24..d4 exd4 ( 6..¤c4! ( 9.¤a3? b5! ( 6..V-Kolarov/Polanica Zdroj/1967/1-0/34/ '!' 'e as brancas conseguiram vencer o final') A) 7. 5.¤c4! ¥xf3 10..f6? 7.¦xe3 £xa2 31.S Maribor 1967 sendo duvidoso que as pretas saíssem da abertura com igualdade. continuou com: £f6 8.£d5 27..My 160 Memorable Games 34 14.¢xg2 ¦h6! '~~' 12.Tfb1. foi necessário voltar ao século XIX para encontrar as alternativas capazes de oferecer às pretas melhores perspectivas. em primeiro lugar.. 1967.¥f2 ) 24..b3 '!' ¤f6 10.fxg3² Hort.£xf3 £xf3 11.¦xe6 a5 21..£xd4 f6 8.f3 £xa2!-+ Fischer ] 18..£xd4± '=' '|^' 'as brancas podem obter a iniciativa.¥f4 h6! 22..¤xe5! £d4 7.¤xe5! '=' .g3 h2+ 13.gxf3 ( 29. ainda não está definitivamente claro o meio que têm as pretas de defender o PK" (Gligorich).¦fe1 ¤e4ƒ Fischer ] 24.¤g5 £h6 10.B] (35)' '0-1 Portisch. reativando a ameaça do PK preto (Gligorich).¦e5-+ .¤e5 £xg2+ '!' 11.¦h3 £xf2 35.¥xc4 19.V-Kolarov/Polanica Zdroj/ 1967/1-0/34/' 'com um ataque vitorioso') 8.¤xd3 ¥h2+= '!' '=' 'empata'.h3 f4 '!' 26.¤xe5 gxh3 12.d3! '?' £f6 8.e6? fxe6 10.¥e6? 7. as brancas cometeram erros táticos importantes e ganhando tempo para se desenvolver.h4 '?' [ ¹28. 5. graças à imaginação de Fischer.¥xg5 a5-+ ] 33.f4 ¤f3+! 25.n-Reshevsky.. mas provavelmente as pretas poderão impedir essa expansão.£d3!² '~~!' '!' ( 7.SReshevsky.d3? £f5 9... decidi que ele estava pronto a repetição da linha.¦e5!± .c3 £d3! 8.L-Fischer.¦ae1 ¥xc4 [ 17...g5 23.¢e8 32.¥xh6 £xh4+ 34.¥e3! £b5 ( 23. B) 7.Svetozar La Habana olm fin-A.f3 £f2 32.c3© . h4 Fischer] 22.¤xc4-+ 19.¤c3 gxh3 13.R/Santa Monica 2/549 1966/Inf02/[Ivkov. by I. Se' £f6 7...d3 £g6 10.¦g1 ¦g6+ 13.f4© '!' 'com jogo promissor para o peão. prejudicaram um pouco a estrutura dos peões das pretas. Bernstein e também pelo mestre holandês Barendregt e foi por longo tempo estuda por mim antes de ser incluída em meu arsenal.f4? ¤d6 … 2 5 .' [ 4...¤d2-+ Fischer ] 28.2/236 1. '.d4 ¥xf3 8.£f6? /\ .h4 '!' gxh4 13.f3 £d2 30.R/ Santa Monica 1966/MCL/[Ftacnik] (35)' 0-1 C69 Fischer.¥e7? von Reshevsky gespielt 6.¦a8 ¢c6 '0-1 Portisch.E-Blackburne.¤e7 9.£xa8 ¥xg2! 'Der weisse Plan: a3.¥e7 ¤d2! 22.ou 10.d4 ] 5.£xf3 £xf3 . Polônia..hxg5 [ 33.Robert James Gligoric.d5? e5 ] 20.0-0 ¥b7 9.¥b8 ] 27.'.¦e1? ¥e6 10. à minha frente.¥e3 '!?' £xg3 11.¥g4 6. Entretanto.d4 exd4 7.¤bd2 '!' ¤e7 9.J Frankfurt/ Main 1887') 7.. A continuação do texto era preferida por Emanuel Lasker.£g3 ¥d6 9. f4..¥g4 7..¥g7 £c4 33.¢g2 h4ƒ '=/+' 'com iniciativa') 9.¥d6? 6.

A/Berlin/ 1971/ ) 12.¦f7 Fischer.. libera as brancas e será a causa das futuras dificuldades de Gligorich.¤d2! ¤c5 16.My 160 Memorable Games 35 11.. 19..R-Portisch.¥xc5 0-0-0 'Gligoric..¢xc8 18.P Moscow 1967') 11.£c5? '!' 18.¥d7! 10.¤b6 ¦c7 33.¢f1 ¦ae8 19.. 17..S-Lee. B2) 17.¥xc5± Fischer.¦xd1 fxe5 13..¤c3 é mais preciso) 13.a4! /\ a5 '~~!' '+/-!' 'seguido de Pa5 seria quase decisivo. A2) 9.a4! Hort.cxd4 £d7?! [ 8..g4? /\ 20.¤a4! '• Te3' ¦hf8 21.¥xh8 0-0-0! '?' ) 13..¤c4 0-0 11.e5 1-0 Hort-Zelandinov Havanna 1967 '?' '!' 'e as pretas abandonam..¥e3! /\ Nb1-d2-c4 ¥d6 ( 10. 14.V-Sliwa.d5 9.B/Polanica Zroj/1967/1-0/37/' '+/-!'.gxh3 ¥xd1 12.' [ 6.¦ab8 16.Th3..£f5² 'T' 'com as brancas ligeiramente melhor.¤c4 0-0-0 13.¥g3 ¥d6 14..¥e3 b5?! '1-0 Hort-Zelandinov Havanna 1967' ( 14.¤e7 8.¤c5 £e7 17.¦e1 B1) 17.¥g5 '!' ¥xc3 13.J i m e n e z .¥d7² oferece boas perspectivas defensivas) 10.¤b6# ) 18.R/Hamburg EUTCH/1965/0-1/17/'.. eliminando a possibilidade de qualquer dificuldade futura em vista do bispo.¢e2± /\ g3.¥xf6 ¦xf6 15.L Habana ol 1966..¦ce1 ¦d7 29.¦f8 14.¤g6 é correto ) 18.¥e3 f5 16.R-Smyslov.. 13..¦e1 ¥f8 26. ) 11.. 17.¤xc5! ) 9.¢xh2?? £xf2-+ Barendregt-Teschner. E H a b a n a o l 1 9 6 6 ' ( 31.¦xc7+!! '!' ¥xc7 21.¤a5± Fischer.¤g6 .¦f7 .e5 '!' ¥xe5 15.¤b5! ...R-Spassky.b6÷ 'Barendregt-Teschner.¦xd1 '+/=' 'as pretas agüentariam o final embora tivessem encontrado um meio de perdê-lo' ¦e8 13.¥xf3 ( 12. 9.¤xd7 ¢xd7 12.¦c8+!! '-+' ¢a7 ( 17.¤h6 11.'] 6.c5! 18..exd5 ¢b8 25.¦xd1 ¥d6 ( 9.fxe5 ¥xe5 13.¦e1² Kortschnoj 'Fischer.£c5 22.¦xf4 ¥d7 17....¤c6+ '!' ¥xc6 23.'] 7..¤g6 10.E/ Habana ol/1966/1-0/31/ '?!' 'abandonam.R-Unzicker.dxe5 ¥c5 14. Fischer. Nimzovich. mas daqui por diante as brancas deverão cuidar do seu Ph para que ele não se torne um possível alvo..n Habana 1967. 13.£xg4! 'Analyse Keres' ( 13..dxe4 15.D Hastings 1965' ) 11..¥g3 h5 13.¦b1 ¤xb2 20.R-Portisch.¥d6 mantendo o centro. Hort.¤c3!? . Evans e outros teóricos davam enorme importância a essa manobra.d6 '!' cxd6 30... B) 8..¢f1 a5 19..fxe5 9..£d3 ¤e5 12.¥xf3 '!' 9.V-Keres. 10.a4² Fischer..¥d6! 10.f4!± '!' 'mantém a iniciativa.g4+.fxe5? ¤xe4 12.] 8.£xa6# )] 12.' 13.¦d1!² 'Hort.d5 '!' cxd5 14.¦xc7!! 'Kortschnoj' £xd1 17...f4 ¤f6 11..¥xc5 ¥xc5 17.A/Berlin/1971/..¤bd2 ¤f6 11.¥f4 etc..¤a5 '!' b5 ( 10.¦d3 A1) 9.V/Monte Carlo/1967/1/2-1/2/40/ '!' ( 19.L/Habana ol/1966/1-0/34/') 15. Steinitz.V-Sliwa..¤fxe5 ¥e6= Hecht.¥f4 ¦a7! 11.... 21..¤d2 ¤xd2 19..¥f6 ¦g8 28.RA n a s t a s o p o u l o s / A t h e n s i m / 1 9 6 8 / 1 .£b6+ ¢a8 24..H-Matanovic..£xh3 11.¥h5 10.....' a5? 'seria impossível em vista de' 13..¦h4 14...¦xd1 A) 8. C) 7..£f3 ¥xh2+ '?' 10. 21.¤a4! ¢b8 16.¦d1 '+-!' 'as brancas teriam vencido o final ' ¢e7 17. '] 7..c3 ¦ae8 19.)] 10.fxe4 g6? ( 17.' [ 9. Fischer.¤a4! '-+' ¢b8 16. 8. relaxando a tensão.¦ac1 fxe4 17.£c4 11.¦xd2 ¦e4³ Fischer.¢e2! ) 19.. V-Zelandinov..f3 0-0-0? 'Fischer.¤xf3 0-0= 14.B/ Polanica Zroj/1967/1-0/37/ 'N' '+/-!' 'as brancas estariam melhor.¦c1 ¤g6 'As pretas perderam tempo para alcançar essa posição inferior.c5 8. Hort.¦xf6 gxf6 16..W/Siegen ol/ 1970/1-0/42/' '??' 12.d4 ¥g4! 'best' (Fischer) '|^' '#O melhor.c4?! 'Bagirov-Keres Moskau 1967' ( 15.¥g4? 11...¦f7 seria mais adequado) 22.f4 ¥d6 14.exd4 7.¦d1 £c5 ( 10.0 / 2 8 /.¥xg5 ¦f7 23.¤e7 14..¤a4² '=' '+/-!' 'ofereceria às brancas um provável empate.£h5+! g6 9.¤xe5 ¥xe5 13.c3 '!' 'O texto envolve um gambito.¢g2 '|^' 'como perigosa preponderância dos peões centrais' ) 11.¥f4! '+-' ¥g7 19.L/ Habana ol/1966/1-0/34/ '?' 'e a posição desorganizada das pretas cairia em pouco tempo.£xf3 £xd4 10.gxf3 fxe5 B1) 10.b6? 10...¥xf6? ¥xb2 14.bxc3 '!' ( 13.¤xa6+! 'Fischer... 11.f5 £e7 15.¥f4 ¥xf4 16.¤c4 ¥e7 13.¥xe7 ¥xe7 31. Fischer. vencendo eventualmente. Fischer.¤c3 Hecht.B (16)/Reykjavik-WCH/1972/1/ 2-1/2/60/ '?'.¥e3 c5 13.f3 ( 13.VSliwa.¤f3 ¥c6÷ ) 18.R-Unzicker.¥xd6 £xd6 .¥f5? 13.) 22.¤h2 ¦xh2 '!' 13.¦d4 ¦fe8 ( 17. O lance de Polugaievsky 9.¤c3 f4 14..¥e3 f5 13.W/Siegen ol/1970/1-0/ 42/ '~~' .¥e3 ¤g6 9..¥d6! 12../\ Te3 ) 13.¤c3± 0-0-0 11..¤c3 ¢c8 15.h3 ! siehe Wahls.¦c1 bxc4 17.¤e5 ¥xd1! '=/+' ( 10..R/ Hamburg EU-TCH/1965/0-1/17/) 13.h3 '!' 'Forçando a retirada do bispo.. B2) 10.g4± Fischer.£e3+.B (16)/Reykjavik-WCH/1972/ +-+/60/' bxa6 18.hxg4 hxg4 12.¥xf3 10.¤b6# .¥d6 15.£b3+ ¢a7 20.¤d4 ¥d7 19.R-Portisch....J/ Buenos Aires/1970/1-0/28/ '?'..¤c5 18.¦d3 ¦f8 18..¥d6? 9.H-Matanovic.R-Spassky.¥f4 '!' '#' ¤e7 [ 11.¥xh6 gxh6 12.' ] 9.¦xf3 ¤f6 11.c5 9.¤a4!± '!' ¥xg3? .¤e7 11..' [ 7.¦f7 .R-Jimenez.. B) 14..¤xd4 A) 7.¥xc7 ¥b5 ( 21.¤g6 .¤cxe5 ( 12..¤b3 £xd1 ( 8...¤b3 ( 18.¥xf3 9.R-Rubinetti.¢g2 cxd5 24.MBoudre ¥d6= Gligoric '=/+!' 'como o melhor para as pretas..¦dxc4 ¤d3 19.d4 '!' ¥d6 11.¤d2 ¥d6 10...gxf3 ¤g6 12.¤c3 ¥e6 14..¤d2 ¤xd2 14.¤e4 ¥b6 18.¦ae8!= .E Habana ol 1966 se ¦e8 32.'.¥e3 ¥c5 13.¥xg7?? '• a5' ¥xa1 15.¤c4 ¤xe4 12.¥b8+ ¢a8 19.¥f4 .'=!' ( 23.......¤c3 ¥b4 12.exd4 [U m a a l t e r n a t i v a s e r i a 7.¦f7 abandonam..¦f1 '!' ¦g7 27.d5 '!' ¦d8 20.¤d5± Bagirov-Keres Moskau 1967 '!' 'Bagirov.g5!? 12.¦c1! 'e agora:' A) 14.¦g8!= '~~' .¦ae8= ) 15.R-Jimenez.f4 ..B POL1967') 9..¤d2 ¤e7 12.¢xh2 £xd4 11.¦xc6 a5³ '!' ) 18.' ¥e6 'Recuo normal que.¦d3 b5 14.¥d6!? 8.¥d6 12..') 11. R .¤c3 '!' ( 11.¤d5+. B) 7.£b6++..g3 g5? '=/+' 'desmoronando-se sob a pressão' ( 21.dxe5 £xd1 8..c4 ¤e7 12.¤c3 ¤e7 12.

S YUG 1970.Be7.¥xe6? [ 21.¥g4 [ 20.¦c1 £b2 28.¥g5 e6 7... ' [ 14..£xg5± £d3 26.cxd5 exd5 24..¤xf6 5.¥e3 £e7 8. [ 25.N-Gutman/Riga 1967) Black's king will soon feel the heat.£xd7+ ¢xd7 24.'] 16.¤d1 ¤b5 9.£g1 £d7 ¢c6 24.¦xg7 ] 21.£f2 ¤d6 47.a4 ¤a7 41..cxd5 £d3 23.gxf4 gxf4 31.£h3 ¦e8 28..h3 )] 20.£xh7± ) 21.¦h2 ¤f6 30.¥xe5+ ¥d6 Fischer.dxe6 ¦d8 26.¤c5+ ¢b8 22..¦f7+ ¢e6 0-1 E92 Gligoric.¢h2 £xd1 28.£g4 ¢b6 5.Robert James 14.¤xb6+ ) 17.¥c4 e6 7..Robert James Monaco 1967 1.. ] 1-0 22..Efim P 17.£f8 £e2 30...¥g4 ¦b8 24. 12..¤xe4 £e7 24.e4 21.¥c6 ¦a7 27.f5 White plays to .bxc4 £xh6 50.£b6 ¢b8 The point of Black's eighth move.¤f3 0-0 6..¤xd5 cxd5 ¤b5 39.'=/+' )] 18..£f2 0-0-0 23.¥d2 g5 12..£xg6+ ¢d7 24.¥e3 ¤xe4 This makes 26.¤xd4 ¤f6 28.cxd5 ¥a4 24.¥xe4 dxe4 24..¤xc6++...£xc5 ¥e7 48.£d3 22.e4 c5 2.ZMarjanovic .£xc4 ¤b6 23.¦xb7 £f2 king still lives there...fxg3 ¢b8 [ 15.£d4+ ¢g6 57. opening the d-file and wasting A) 20.g6 more time.exd5 24.£xg3? 19.£xe2 22.dxe5 ] 14.f3 £e8 25.¥xd5 a5 28. alguns espectadores casuais.¥f3 e4 23.Tal-Bogdanovic/Budva 1967) B1) 22.£xh7!+.£b4+ 1-0 Zhuravlev.bxa6 19.¦b1 £a3 10..¤e5 £h4 20.£e1 ¥e4 23.¤xe5 £d6 44..d4 cxd4 4.£xe7 22.¤c5+ ¢b8 21.£a4+ £d7 23.fxe5 20.d4 ¤f6 2.e5 '!' 'O método mais v i g o r o s o .fxe6 fxe6 12.¦f7 1-0 Joseph..¤xd4 ¤f6 ¢d7 25.0-0 ¤xd4 10.¤xe4 dxe4 13.¥g4 ¥xg4 15.h5 f4 11.0-0 ¥c5+ [ 16.¤b2 ¥e7 36.£g8+ ¢d7 23.¦c3! 'Gligoric' 'seguido de Ra3 seria muito convincente.£c2 £d3 22.¤c3 ¥g7 4.£a3+ ¦b3 56..cxd5 17.£e7 £xe2 The queen isn't really doing anything here and 31.¥f4!+..¥h5+ ( 21. 20.£d2 £xb2 ¥xf6 32.. 0-1 19.. Ninguém poderia supor que Gligorich estava jogando com duas peças a menos!.gxh3 e4 23.¦f7+ ¢c6 22.¤xg4 ¤d7 16.¥d4 20.£xc5 25..£b7+ ¢e6 30.¢c2 £h3 51.h4 f5 B97 10. ' ¤xe5 'Desespero total!!' [ 19..¤c3 a6 26. 19.dxc4 21..¤c5 £e7 ] 15..£b4 1-0 Sirotkin-Sorokin/URS 1967.£xd5 ) 24.¤xc6 35.¦xf1 ¥b7 [ 19...¦f7+ ¢c6 27.£a4! '?' '#' ¢a7?? '~~' 'Catastrófico.c4 ¦xf1+ 19.£xc7+ ¢e6 Skopje 1967 33. 26.¥h5+ ¢d7 B88 21.¦xd7+ ¢xd7 29. Black should 21.£f1 ¦f8 29.¦d1 ¥d7 ( 22.¦d1 ( 24.e4 c5 2.Robert James 28.B/cr 1978.Bc5. 11.¦c3 a s p r e t a s p o d e r i a m t e r a g ü e n t a d o c o m ¤f8! ( 18. O rude despertar veio com.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¦c3 b5 25.¥c8 18.£xg6+ 1..¦xg6 hxg6 33.£c2! Hora de consolidar.¢d3 £xa4 54.¦f7+ ¢c8 25.¢b8 15.¤c4 £g6 ¦f8 18.¥xe5 dxe5 43.£xe4+ ¢c7 26.£c3! Lepeskin ¢f7 27.¦a7 ] 17.£xh7± ..£b5 25.¥xc8 ¦xc8 26.f4 £b6 8.¥xg6+ hxg6 23.¤xa6+.£d5+ ¢e7 Dely. B2) 22..¥c3 bxc6 13.¦f3÷ Gipslis ] 20.£a1± .¤c4 £d7 37..e5 ¦xc3+ ¢e4 31.¥a4+ ¢d8 just play 8..Peter 31...£c2 things really bad.¥b3 a6 8.£xf1 ¥xg4 26.¤f3 d6 3.¥xe6+ ¢b8 26.¦hg1 ¤d7 1.£d8+ ¤xc4 49.¦g2 ¥d8 27.¥d1 ¥e7 ( 20.¦a7 20..d5 ¤e8 9.¦xc6 ] 19.£e2!! ¥e7 22.h3 £e1+ 27.£h5+ g6™ 23..b6 16.£e8+ ¢c4 26.b3 ¢h7 34.¦xb7 £d3÷ ) 24.£b7+ ¢e6= ( 31.cxd5+ ¢b5 25..'+-!' 'Golpe final..h6!? 20.¤h2 ¢h8 Fischer.¥g4 ¥c8 ( 21.¦c2 ¦b8 55.h6 ¥f6 13.£xg7+.My 160 Memorable Games 36 '=' 'Cedendo definitivamente ao cavalo a posição c5..¦dg1 ¤c7 20.g3 c5 19. B) 20.Djukic.£f3 ¦g8 Geller..£xe6+ ¦c6 30.£xa8 ¥b7 29.¥c7?! 32.£xh7 ¥xg5 24..¥e7 22.'] 20.¥e7 21.¤f3 d6 3.¦c8 21.também seria bom. He threatens 11..£c1 e5? ( 23.¤d1 Monaco 1967 b5 21.£c2 45..¤c5 £d6 17.' [ 17. chegados nesta altura do jogo.cxd5 ¦d7 21.c4 g6 3.£f4 £xf1+ 25.¥a5 ¤d4 38.£c6+ ¢d3 52.¥e2 dxe5 16.¥b2 ¥d8 40.¥f4+ e5! 27. Segundo um jornal de Havana..£a6+.e5 ¤d5 [ 13..¥xe7 ¢xe7 ( 21.dxe5 fxe5 21.¥d1 ¢d7 25...¥e2 £e4 29...¢h1 42.e4 d6 5..0-0-0 ¦g6 18.¥e2 e5 7.P-Persson. As pretas abandonam.£f4 ¥d7 25.f5 ¤c6 11.d5! ¥f7 ( 16.f4 £a5 28.' ¥xh3 'Desespero!' [ 18.£g5+ ¢d6 23.£d4 £b2 21..£c2+.£xh7 1-0 Fransson.¦f7 ¦e8 Black is inviting White to open the center while his 24. 23.c5+ ( 24.¦g2 ¤c8 46.£a5+ ¢c8 25. but White has no trouble preventing that and Scalisi/cr ITA 1972) 22.) 24.¥xe7+.£e2 ¦ag8 24.£e2 bxc4 22.£e2 '!' 'etc. pensaram que as brancas haviam somente trocado duas peças por uma torre.£xe4+¥xd1 25.£xd4 d5 23..¦h2+ ¢g7 53.¦c3 27. 9.d4 cxd4 4.Svetozar Fischer.¤c3 a6 6.¥c3 g5 15.¥e7!!+. 20.£b4÷ ) 23..

¤e4 g6 25.£e2 Fischer has always enjoyed playing the White side of this opening.¥g2 g6 5.Kf7 lose the queen.a3 bxa3 14. 15.Jovan Skopje A08 1967 1.a3 intending to follow up with b4.Lhamsuren Sousse izt 1967 1. Bxd4 The threat to take on g7 freezes Black's kingside and White will simply bring his rooks to the e 15.¥xf6 gxf6 Black's ki ng is completely undefended.h3 16. otherwise White's rook joins the queen in the attack.d3 ¥g7 6. 7.h4 a5 12.¦xd6 So. 15.axb3 ¦xh3 26. Try playing 19. ¢b8 13..f4 ¥b7 9.exd5 16.¥g2 dxc2 30.g3 c5 5. Kd8 gets mated after 18. £xf8 17.¥h3 d4 17.£d2 ¤f6 11..¤c3 ¤c6 6.£d4 This is a double attack on the bishop at d7 and pawn at f6.d3 d5 3..£xh3 ¥xd5 27.Bxf7+ And White comes out a piece ahead. as Fischer threatened a big sacrifice at e6.. and 17. The Black queen can transfer to the kingside and help in the defense.¤g7+ ¢d8 20.¤g5 ¤d5 19.¥c4 e6 7.d4 cxd4 4.¦h4 ¦a7 29..¥e3 0-0 9.0-0 Now White's king becomes a target. but Black's next move squelches ..¥xf1 ¦he8 17. espescially the a2-g8 diagonal and the f.bxa3 ¤a5 15.. known as the Velimirovic Attack in the Sicilian Defense.Robert James Sousse Interzonal 1967 1.£h5 ¦fc8 22. He should have gone after Black's king with 12.¥b5 White hopes to get counterchances by e4-e5-e6.Robert James Sofrevski.£d3 ¥h2+ 22.e4 c5 2. ¥e8 19.¦xe4 c4 27.£f3 ¤xb3 25. ¥a6 Black wins the exchange for nothing. 15. 1-0 shot sets the theme for the rest of the game: Fischer snipes alternately against the White king and e pawn.fxe6 ¥xe6 14. since 15. and his initiative snowballs.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.Ke7 and 17. g6 19. but White does not have much in the way of an attack.¤c3 a6 6.Rd1+ and 19. but White doesn't have to agree to this.f5 e5 10.Nh5 to keep equality.file.¥g1 Losing...¦xf8+ White forces Black's queen back in order to penetrate with his own queen.¤f3 ¥b7 8.¥d2 ¥xg5 20..¥f4 a4 13. but after Black's next move. 16. £a5 10.¥f6 £e8 24.. 14. earning W h i t e e v e n m o r e m a t e r i a l .¥xg5 £d7 21. prepares to pile up on White's e-pawn and enhances his queen bishops diagonal.¢e1 £f4 0-1 B89 Fischer.f3 f5 20.¥b3 ¥e7 8. 17.Robert James Miagmasuren.¤d5 ¦fe8 Black has t o decline the sacrifice. while Black's queen is forced out of the way.¤f1 ¤b6 18.¤gf3 ¥e7 7.¤d5 ¥xh4 17.¦h3 ¦h4 24.¥g5 ¥e7 12. White does not get the desired attack.¦e1 b5 10. h5 This sharp rim Fischer.£xh7+ 1-0 B25 Bernstein Fischer.exf7+ Kd8 16.Rf2 doesn't work after 15.exd5 £xf6+ 28.0-0 £d7 9. but gains material instead. 18.Rh5 Bg4 18.¤e3 ¥a6 16.¤c3 d6 3. as you can confirm with Gambit.Qg3 Qe2 19.Ng4. 21. £b4 Hoping to ease the pressure by exchanging.h5 cxd3 28.¤f3 d6 3..£h6 £f8 31. 0-0-0 12.g3 ¤c6 4.¤f1 b4 11.£g5 ¤xe4 26.Donald Fischer.£e3 b6 14.e4 c5 2.. He had to play 13.e5 ¤d7 9. 10.h4 b4 Now White must either give up a pawn or allow the h file to be opened.Rec7 against Gambit and see what he does! 1-0 B87 Byrne. Fischer eliminates that possibility with a brilliant stroke. 14.e4 c5 2..Robert James Netanya 1968 1.d4 cxd4 4.¤d2 ¤f6 4.¤xh5 £g5 Bringing the heavy artillery to bear against White's king in a wonderfully unorthodox manner.¦ae1 White tries to play in the center where he has no real object of attack.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤de2 ¤bd7 11. White's knight becomes i r r e l e v a n t .¢h1 To save his queen bishop from 11.¤g3 ¦c8 13.£xf6 Black now resigned.Nxe4 is no better. ¦c8 18.¥xf6 ¥xf6 16.Rxd5 Qa6 17.£a4+ Black resigned here.f4 b6 Black waits to commit his king knight in order not to give White a kingside target.¥c4 e6 7. White pursues his imaginary play on the e-file completely oblivious to how tangled his pieces are becoming on the kingside.Ng4.¥e3 f5 In one stoke Black prevents White from getting play by f5.¢f1 ¤c5 23.Qxd4 16.My 160 Memorable Games 37 open more lines. fxe4 14.¥g2 ¤c6 6.Qxd4 15.¤xe7+ ¦xe7 17.¥b3 b5 8.¦f3 ¥g3 Black's threats on the h file are now decisive.0-0 0-0 8.Qd7+.f6 A desperate attempt to get play.¤d2 ¤c3 23.¤f3 d6 3.¢b1 ¦ad8 13... 15.¥xe6 fxe6 15.¤g5 ¥xf1 16.e4 e6 2..0-0-0 ¤xd4 11.¥xd4 ¥d7 12.dxe4 14..

£g4 ¤g7 25.¥xc6 £xc6 20..¦b3 £a5 28.¤a2 ¤c5 ( 14.J/ Polanica Zdroj 1965/MCD (43)..d7 b2 51.a3 b4 24.¦c1 ¦fe8 19.£xd6 ¤c4 20.¢xg2 ¤e6 19.¤c3 a6 6.g5 ¤e8 14.¤d5 £g5 22.g4 b5 13.¦h3 ¥c5 54.bxc4+ ¢xc4 47..c3 ¦ac8 18.R/New York 1957/MCD (40) .¦xf2 ¦e8 26.¦de1 ¦ac8 26..¤e7+ ¢f6 41.¢xg3 hxg6 27.£xe2 ¥f6 21.¥b2 £c8 25. e5 7..h4 a5 36.¢g2 axb4 26.¦xd5+ 1-0 Cardoso.a5 ¦c8 22.¢f1 £d1+ 45.¥e3 ¥e6 14..£d5+ ¢c3 53.£xd5 £c7 21.¥e3 ¤c5 15.¥f1 ¢xc8 34.£e1 £d3 46.¥e3 ¥a6 18.f4 ¤c6 16.¦xa3 ¥xa3 35.£xg7+ ¢d3 56.¤d5 ¤xd5 18.gxh6 1-0 Kagan.exd5 ¤e3 28.¤b6 £e7 37.¢f4 ¥c8 34.¦e6+ ¦xe6 34.b3 £c7 28.. B) 9.£xf7+ ¢xf7 23.e5 ¤e6 38.R-Fischer.M-Tringov.¦xe3 £xe3 31.¦d3 £b6 25.g4 ¦e8 13.d4 cxd4 4.axb5 axb5 36.f4 ¥b7 12. [T h e r o u t i n e 8.¦e2 £f3+ 38.G/Sarajevo 1965/MCD (57) ) 15.£d3 £xd3 31.¦a5 1-0 Matulovic.¦e1 bxc3 17.M-Barczay.£d2 ¥b7 16.¤c3 ¦c8 29.h3 b5 11.¤xf8 £h1+ 36.h3 ¤bd7 ( 11.¦f2 £a5 18.¦g6 ¦e1+ 30.¦xc3 ¦xb2 21.¢d6 £xg4 55..g4 ¤b6 13.¦xc5 a2 57.¥e4 ¢e7 35.¦xe8+ ¢xe8 33.¦xh5 ¢g6 34.cxb4 ¦c1+ 39.¦e2 ¥b6+ 44.¦g3 ¢f6 26.¤d5 ¥c5+ 28.¦ad1 ¥f4 21.¥xf6 ¥xf6 14.hxg6 fxg6 51.¤bd7 A1) 10.¤d5 £b7 24.¥g2 .¥d4 ¦c4 23.¢g2 ¦h8 40.f5 fxg5 17.h4 ¤ge6 26.¢h2 ¥b4 29.b5 10.R-Ubilava.¤d5 ¤a6 15.R-Fischer.¦f2 ¦f7 22.¥d4 This loses a piece.¤xe5 ¦xe5 22.¤ec3 ¤c7 16.£xf7+ ¢d8 39.gxf4 c4 27.¢d6 c4 46.¢h4 g5+ 38.£xh7+ ¢f8 36.¤f7 ¦de8 Black gives back the exchange to eliminate White's only active piece.g4 h6 23.¤f3 i s a n o t h e r p o s s i b i l i t y] 7.¢f2 £c2+ 43..M-Bednarski.¦h1 £d7 34..My 160 Memorable Games 38 this. This is rarely played.h4 ¥xh4 24.¤xe4 ¥xe4 17.R/ New York 1957/MCD (56)) 11.¦d2+ ¥d5 40. but if the knight moves away Black plays 25.axb3+ axb3 50.hxg5 ¢f7 33.¦c2 £b3 30.¥e4 g6 32.b4 12.¥e3 ¦c8 21.¥b7 11.£xd5 £c7 14.£xd5 ¦a7 13.h3 b6 12.¤g3 b4 14..¤xg3 exf4 48.£xe8+ £xe8 32.¥f3 ¢d8 37.£g4 ¥b7 33.c3 ¥b7 15.¥xf6 ¥xf6 10.g5 ¤e8 23.¥e2 ¥d7 42.¤h5 ¤e4 27.¦e4 £c5 25.¤c4 dxe5 40.¤xc8+ ¢d7 33.1968 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 484 Winning Chess Strategies by Yasser Seirawan and Jeremy Silman Sicilian Defence.£f6 ¢e3 1/2-1/2 Cardoso.¦d1 a5 28.¤de2 [ 7.¦fd1 ¥xd5 20.b4 axb4 38.¥d3 £f4 44.exd5 ¤g5 19.h6 11.¥xf4 exf4 28.£d3 0-0 11...¦xd6 ¦ch1 42. 21.¤xb4 ¤fxe4 16.g3 Najdorf Zagreb Fianchetto Variation.dxe6 £e4 35.c3 ¦b6 29.c3 ¥a6 16.S-Ree.¦ab2 ¦a8 33.¥g3 £e3 22.¢h2 ¦8e2 31.¦af1 £a8 24.b4 ¤xd5 18.¤e4 £b7 39.exd5 ¦fb8 32.a4 h5 35.£f4 b5 23.£h4 ¦c8 35. B2) 10.RJ] 9.£d3 ¦b8 17.£g3 £xg3 47.£h5 £d8 22.¢g2 e4 37.¥g5 ¥c6 13.¤d7+ ¢e7 33.£xf7 £e4+ 54.¦f6+ ¢xe7 1/2-1/2 Matulovic.Robert James Vinkovci it 09.¥e2 g6 39.h4 £g6 29.¤xf4 £xb2 29.¦xd3 fxg5 32.¦e4 a4 53.¥xf4 exf4 23.¦h1 ¦fe8 25.£d5 £xd5 31.a3 ( 10.exd5 £b6+ 15.h3 ¥b7 12.¦af1 ¦d7 19.g4 b4 13. Nxe4 and Black will win by a discovered check on the a8-h1 diagonal.¤xc3 ¤c5 18.g5 ¦e6 27.f3 h5 24.¥xb5 ¦xa3 34.¤f6+ ¢f7 32.c4 ¢c5 0-1 Gadia.¦b3 ¥c5 36.¥xe4 ¦cxe4 28.¤d6+ ¢e7 32.a4 b6 ( 10.¦e2 g5 37.¦xb2 £xb2 25.h5 ¤f4+ 27.¥xb5+ ¢xd6 42.¤c3 exf4 24.¦c1 £b3 23.¤d6 ¦e7 52.h4 ¥d8 24. Najdorf Zagreb Fianchetto Variation 6/ 560 1.¦xb6 ¥xb6 38..Milan Fischer.f3 a5 17.¤xg6 ¥xg3+ 26.f4 ¤c7 36..¢f1 £c1+ 42.¤f3 d6 3.d8£ b1£ 52.L/ Sarajevo 1968/MCD (39)) 11.c3 ¦c5 27. e5 18.c5+ dxc5+ 43.¤e4+ ¢f7 30.¥e7 8.¦h2 ¢xg5 35.¤d5+ ¥xd5 27.¥c4 f5 37.09..¦1f2 f6 26.£d3 £a8 30.e5 £xa4 31..¢h2 exf4 16.¦b1 h5 23.¢g3 ¦g1+ 37.£d1 ¤c5 16.a4 ( 11.¥e2 £xf5 43.¤d5 ¤xd5 13..¥f3 ¥c8 41.¢g2 £d7 22.¢xf1 g6 20.¦xf4 b5 21.¤xe8 ¦xe8 49.¢h5 ¥e4 39..f6 ¥xf2+ 25.¦exe6+ ¢f7 43.£h4 ¤e6 35.¤d5 ¦ce8 30.H/Siegen 1 9 7 0 / M C D ( 2 8 )) B1) 10.£g8+ ¢e7 38.f5 ¥xe2 20.£c2 ¤f8 20.£c3 1-0 Matulovic.f4 bxc3 20.f4 exf4 20.¥xg5 £xg5 19.¦c1 ¦ab8 19.£d2 ¦b7 15.¢g1 h4 39.fxe5 ¦xe5 19.¦xe8+ ¦xe8 31.e6 ¦c7 37.B/Mar del Plata 1960/MegaBase 97 (44). ¦f5 0-1 B91 Matulovic.a5 15.¥e3 £c7 ] 8.axb4 cxb4 25.¤e4 ¥d4 50.¥e2 ¢b6 39.¦ce1 ¥e5 23.£e2 ¢f8 30.¢d4 ¥d7 40.OWexler.¤xd5 ¥e7 19.¥xb5 ¢xb5 45.¢c6 a4 48.¢e5 ¥b5 44. A2) 10.¥f1 ¥xf1 19.¤cd6 £b2+ 41.¦c3 a3 56.¥xc5 dxc5 26.a5 12.¥f1 ¥b6 25.¢e3 ¢c7 38.¥b5 1/2-1/2 Kholmov.¦e2 £b3 32.¥e3 ¥xg2 18.¦a2 £c3 22..¢f1 ¢f5 36.¤f6+ ¢g7 34.£d2 ¥g5 20.¦fe1 £d7 29.¦d1 ¢e7 24.h4 f6 15.¥g2 allows Black to achieve comfortable development by 0-0 9.¦h2 e3 40.¥h3 £e8 28.b4 ¤e6 17.¤c8 ¦e8 55.f4 ¤c7 16.d6 b3 49.¤d5 ¤xd5 14.a4 b4 11.¤bd7 [ 8.c4 ¤g6 21.¤f4 £d4 24..¥xf4 ¥f6 17.¥e6 [Fischer.¦e3 £xa4 33.b3 ¥g4 17.¤d5 ¤xd5 12.¤bd7 11..E/Tallinn 1983/ MegaBase 97 (39) ) 12.¦xb4 ¥c5 27.¦ad1 ¥d8 31.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.0-0 A) 9.e4 c5 2.d6 ¢d7 41.¤g3 ¥f8 14..¦f2 £b6 22.g5 f6 30.¥g5!?N With this and his next move Matulovic reveals that h e a i m s t o c o n t r o l d 5 .hxg5 ¥xg5 18.¦xf6 £c4 29..£xc7 £e3+ 21.

a5 parando 10.b4 11.. 22...f5+ ¢h7 44.¦c7 ¦e3 47..¤f2 ¦e5 62.¦g1 £xe4 18.¥xe4 ¦xe4 23. 26.b3 £c5 15.¥xc8 with the better game £xc8 13.g4 £a7 33.¥d3 ¤xe4 34.¢e3 ¦a6 78.¢g2 £b8 24.¥e3 cxb2 16.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¤e2 ¦d6 76.¦c2 ¦e1+ 85..¦a2 ¦b6 74.¦xc3 ¦xc3 25.g4! because ¤xe4?! 22. The best chance is the immediate 10.¤d4!!= .¦c3 ¦a6 90. 14. [ 20. Black can proceed with the occupation of the c-file..¢g5 1-0 Maric.¦c2 ¦a6 75. h5! Black stops g3-g4 in its tracks.¦fd1 ¦ac8 17..¦d2 ¦b6 71. and pawns that are in need of constant defense on c2 and e4.¦b3 h5 63.¤f5+ is not what Black wants.g5 )] 30.Minic..¥xe4 ¦xe4 35. Here's how Fischer neutralized M a t u l o v i c .a5 ¦f6 16.b4 e ficando preparado para responder 10. ¦c3! 23.a4?! [ 10.¤f3 e5 7.¥d3 h4! ( 30.Robert James Herceg Novi blitz 1970 The King's Indian Defence by Leonard Barden.a5 ¦c6 19.£f2? ¦xe4 ] 29.£e3! £c7 17.a4' 10.¦b1 f5 'Fischer contra-ataca na ala do rei' 13.£b5 £a7 threatening both c2 and f2..¢d1 ¦d5+ 57. [ 21.¥xf6 ¥xf6 12.£d2 ¤f6 15..¦ac2 ¢h7 32..¦c5 ¦a6 87.h3 ¦d7 21.¦c1 f5 28.exd5 ¦c8 26.24.R-Bogdanovic.¥xf6 bxc3! 13.f4 e4 30.. who is bound hand and foot to the weakling on c2. R/Sarajevo 1968/MCD (12)] 9.£d3 ¦fd8 16.c4 g6 3.b3? This move keeps the R out of c4 but weakens the c3-square.¦a2 [ On 26.¦xb7 ¦g3+ 49.£xf3 31. [ 15.¦c1? ¦xb3! wins a pawn.¦e2 ¦g1 84.d6 ¦d3 46.¢h2 [If 25.£xe4 c4 36.£f3 ¦xc4 38.¤e4 ¦a2+ 88. White suffers from a terrible B on g2.¤e4 ¦e1+ 80.a4 g5 'luta tipica da India do Rei..¤d5 ] 10.¢f3 ¦h5 53. ambos jogadores devem avaliar com precisao as possibilidades de ataque sem descuidar da defesa' 15..f3 f4 14. Belgrade 65 went 9.d5 ¤e7 9.¤d5 ¤xd5 25.¥xd7+ £xd7 11.] 21.¤xa6 ¦xf5+ 51.¥d2 ¤f6 19.¥xe2! Why give up this nice B for the lame N? Because only the N was keeping Black out of c3.¤g3 ¦a2+ 68. but sets about fighting for e5.¤g3= followed by -.¥h3!? b5! Fischer does not waste any time with routine development.¢h1 g4 .¤c5 ¥xd6 48.£d1! 30.£xe2 With White's counterplay crippled..d4 ¤f6 2.£b3 ¥f6 31.0-0 a5! 18.0-0!? 10. on the other hand.¢e2 g5 65.Viktor Lvo Fischer. 0-1 E97 Kortschnoj. a N that doesn't appear to be going anywhere.c5 ¥g5 29.¢e3 ¦a3+ 89.¥xc8 £xc8 16.My 160 Memorable Games 39 ¤c6 12.£d3? [ 16..f3 £c5!³ ] 15.£c5! White.¦d2 ¦e1+ 83.£c6? 21.¤xd5 12.£b6µ It is amazing that with such a clear positive plan on moves 8 and 9 Matulovic should have been so easily pushed back into such a state of passivity as afflicts him now. Matulovic is given no time to bring the B to d3 and free the R.¢d2 ¥xb4+ 59.£d2 ¦hc8 20.¢e1 ¦e5+ 58.¥e2 0-0 6.£xf3 ¦xf3 32.¦e2 ¦a5 69.¦a4 £c5 20.£e3 ¦d7 35.c4 ¦dc7 27.¦xb2 ¥e6µ ] 11.h3! This position is another example of the superior side treading carefully to avoid giving the opponent any counterplay.¦d6+ ¢f7 92. would give White some counterplay chances with 21. Black's natural plan is to double his Rooks on the cfile and add to the pressure against c2.¥g2? Matulovic has refrained from exchanging this B on the last two moves.¤e4 ¦a5 66...¢e2 ¦e5+ 56.¥xd7+?! £xd7 12.¥xf6 ¤xf6 12.0-0 ¤c6 8..bxc5 bxc5 17.¢e5 g4 96.¢f4 ¦h2 98..h4 ¦a2 97. Then he will be free to pursue his queenside dreams. The advantages of the position are not going away.¢f2 ¦f5+ 55.¤b3 ¦g6 'Fischer bloqueou bem a investida de Korchnoi e comecou seu ataque na ala do rei' 18.¦c2 ¦a6 72.¢d4 ¦a3 94.f3? ¦e3! 29.£g4 £b8 40.] 25.¦d3 ¦a5 91.¤g3 £e8 41. is well defended by the Black Q and K.¢d2 ¦e6 86.¦e2 ¦h1 81..¢g2 ¦b5 70.. so Black decides to kill his enemy's counterplay chances first.¢e2 ¦e5+ 52.¤d5 [ 11.¤d3 ¦h5 61.¦d2 ¢e6 40..0-0 ¦c8 1/2-1/2 Matulovic.h4 ¦c3 39.¦d3 ¦bc8 24.¢f2 ¦f6+ 77.g6!-+ 27.¤f2 ¦g1 82.¦b2 ¦c6 73.£b6!µ ] 16.¦c6 ¢g7 93.¤d2 'As brancas procuram levar o cavalo a b3 para apoiar o avanco dos peoes na ala da dama' c5 'Interessante e 9.b4 'Horchnoi segue o plano de expansao na ala da dama' b6 12. [ Matulovic .¤e4 ¥e5 45.b4 £a7 22. William Hartston and Raymond Keene Preface 1. 17.¢g2 ¦e3 33..¦xc4 ¦e7 37. and there is very little to be done about it.¥b7? [ 15. Black's backward d-pawn.¦b1 £g2 17..¢g2 ¦g5+ 54.¦xc4 ¦e3 39.¦e3 ¦f5 64.] 26..¥h6 £h3! 15.. 20.Cb3 com 10.¥c4 [ 30.¥xe7 ¢xe7! Recapturin g thus allows Fischer to get his Q rapidly into play on the queenside.¦c4?! which attacks e4 and prepares for this doubling.¢f2 ¦g5 50.¦d1 ¦e3 38.fxg6+ ¢xg6 43. Unfortunately.¦a2 £b4 18..¤xb4 ¦xa5 60.¢f2 ¢g6 67.¦fd1 ¥a6 19.¥xg7? ¦g8 14.¦a1 d4 37.¦c3 ¦a4+ 95.0-0 ] 16.£g2 [ 29.¤c3 ¦a1 79..¦a2 ¥d8 23.R/Titograd 1965/ MCD (98) ] 10. eventually lost the game. Black has the simple plan of doubling rooks on the c file.a3 ¤e8 11.¤d5 ¥d8÷ . rightly preferring to have some control over the white squares..¦ac1 ] 21.¢f2 d5 36.£xd5 ¦b8 13.e4 d6 5..£g6+ £xg6 42.gxf5 dxc5 34.¥f1 £d4 28.a4!² h6 11.¢g2 f5 Matulovic availed himself of the privilege of sealing a move and adjourning before resigning.0-0 £c4 14.M-Bogdanovic..

¦d1 h6 12. White needs a certain amount of distance between his rook and the enemy king.¥f2 ¥h3+ 36.Kg6 67. when the Black king is further down the board.Larsen Opening 1.£a4 £b6 14.My 160 Memorable Games 40 20. White could still have drawn with the correct move .¢xf5 g3 Black uses the pin to advance the pawn.¤b3 b6 21. ¢g6 51. 71.¤a4 ¤a7 20.¥e1 'Korchnoi se defendeu das ameacas e parece que as negras nao tem como continuar seu ataque' ¤h8 '!' 'O genial Fischer manobra seu cavalo e coloca mais pressao na ala do rei' 25.¢e2 ¦e5+ 56.Rxg1 Rxg1 76.¥e2 ¢h8 15.R/Germany 1999/EXT .f5 72.h3 a5 13.¦a2 ¦h1 41.¦xd4 ¦xa2 23.¦a3 This creates an escape path for the king.gxh3 ¥xh3+ 30. ¦bb1 43.¢e1™ ¦g1+ 37.¦f3 f6 30.¢e2 ¦a5 59.¦ed3 ¦aa1 61.¦e7 ¦e2 31.c4 ¥xd4 16.e4 dxe4 24.¢f1? [ ¹28.¦fd1 f5 19.Rh7+ Kg2 72.£b3 ½-½ Rogers. 70. Pawn to King's knight 4 and doubling rook on the King's Knight file at least twice as Black..f4 ¢h3 69.h3 £e6 13.b4 d6 7.d4 h6 11. Geller said he was confused.d4 f4 22.cxd5 £xd5 8.¥f3 ¤g5 27.¦aa6 ¦f4 40.b4 a6 17.f6 and a drawn position results.£b3 ¥c8 21.¦xd3 ¦f1 66. But White still has no reason to worry.¦aa7 ¦g1+ 35.c4 g6 3.¤xc6 bxc6 13.¥g4 £f6 24. Kf6 Kxf4 ¦a5+ 0-1 A01 Fischer.I-Kempinski. 6.e4 ¤b5 23. Ke6 g1Q 75.RTukmakov.hxg4 ¦b3+ 37.¥xe4 ¥xe4 25.¤c3 ¥f5 8.Rd8 g2 72.¦fd1 e6 20..¢f3 ¢g6 57. White should survive.V/Buenos Aires 1970/MCD (26).¥xd4 £xd4 17.£e2 ¦g6 'Ameacando . The idea is that king and pawn against rook is drawn provided that the pawn i s f a r e n o u g h a d v a n c e d .¦2a5+ ¢g4 49.¤c3 ¤e4 10. 0-1 Kortchnoi..¢g1 ¤f6 24.¥e3 ¤xc3 11.¦8a5 ¦b3+ 46.¦d8 ¦be1+ 53.h3 ¤g6 23.¢g2 ¦ee1 33.¦g8+ ¢f7 52.Rg8+ Kf3 74.¢e2 ¦xg4 38.¦e3 g5 27. tying down Black's forces..Rd7 Kh3 71.¥xg4 32.¥xc8 ¦xc8 26.¤xh3!-+ '!!' 29.Kg4 Kf2 73..£c2 [ 6.¤e5 ¥f5 9. Nimzowitch .Rxg2+ Kxg2 76. Cxh3' 28..Rd8 Re1+ 73.¦d1 ¤c8 19.¢f3 £g5-+ ] 0-1 D79 Geller Fischer.¦f3 ¦h6 22.¦xe4 We have reac hed a double-rook endgame.¥e2 e4 10.¦g3 £xg3+ 34.¥xg1 £f1# ) 32.¦d4 ¤b6 20. ¢h4 70.¤d2 ¤d7 14.R/Herceg Novi 1970/ Lapertosa (31)' [ 31.e3 ¥e7 5..Ulf Siegen TV Exhibition Game 1970 I may be wrong but I think this game was played for a TV audience.¦d5 1-0 Fischer.¦d3 White is prepared to sacrifice the rook for the pawn at the appropriate time.e3 £e5 18.¦ac1 ¦ab8 15.¦e3 ¢h5 60.¢f3 hxg4+ 36.b5 ¤a7 14.£xg4 ( 32.Robert James Palma de Mallorca 1970 1.Rh2 Rh1 75.g3 ¥g7 4.Rh8+ Kg3 73.¦d2 ¢h4 66. but the large number of open files gives White plenty of room to maneuver and.Kd8 ¢g4 Now White is going to lose the f-pawn.¤d2 £xa5³ ] 28. ¦a1 71.Ke7 Re1+ 80..£c2 ¦fd8 11.¦ea6 ¦b4 42. Black has an extra pawn and control of the seventh rank.¢f3 ¦a3+ 63.fxg4 ¤xg4 21.¦h8+ We enter an arid period of maneuvering without much purpose.f6 Kg5 78.¦e4 ¦f5+ 58. in order to constantly give check without the king being able to come up and attack the rook. 68.d3 d5 7.¦2d3 g4+ 64.¦a8 ¢f5 48.dxe5 ¤xe5 25.f5 g2 74..£c2 ¥d7 22. Fischer as Black has played the plan King to rook-one.d3 ¦e8 9. h5 34. ¦xd3 65.a3 0-0 6. After the game.¢f2 ¤g4+ 31.0-0 ¥g6 16.¦d2 ¦f5+ 55.¥g2 0-0 5.¦a4+ ¢h5 50.h3 ¢g7 28. But Fischer is famous for his refusal to agree to draws while there is still play in the position.¢f1™ £f3+ 35.¦xe6 The picture has clarified a bit.¦d2 A big mistake.d5 ¥d7 17.a4 ¥f8 18.¤f3 ¤f6 2.g4 White has a good defensive formation and it is hard to see how Black can make progress. ¦b1+ 32.bxc3 ¤c6 12.cxd5 cxd5 19.0-0 c6 6.¢f3 ¦b5 45.¢e5 This is the decisive error. ¦b8 26. ¢g6 29.¦d3 ¤f7 26.¦d8 f5 62.¦6a4 If a pair of rooks are exchanged now.d4 d5 7. 72.Ra2 Black could never make any progress here..f7 Rf1 79.cxd5 cxd5 8. with no pawn weaknesses.£xa7 ¦a8 21.¤f3 ¥f5 10.¢h2 ¥a6 29. ¦b1 39. Ke8 Re1+ 82.¢f4 Now Fischer finally decides to try his hand at the single-rook endgame..Dh4+ de uma so vez.£c2 c6 15. the d r a w w o u l d b e f a i r l y s i m p l e f o r W h i t e . Kd8 Rf1 81.f5 Kf4 77.¥xg4 ¥xg4 'As negras abandonam ja que nao podem defender sua dama e a ameaca .¦xg4 33. Bobby Fischer was White and transformed a Larsen Opening into a Najdorf Sicilan.¥b2 ¤c6 3.¢f3 ¦e5 54.c4 ¤f6 4.¦a8 ¦hg1 44.b3 e5 2.£d4 £xd4 22.bxc6 ¥xc6 16.¦c1 ¦ac8 18.Robert James Andersson. 67.¦c7 White takes the seventh rank and threatens to play Rf3.¤c3 £d6 9. and thought that he could capture the pawn with check here.¢e2 ¦bb1 47.V-Fischer.g4 ¥d7 12..£d2? £h4+ 33.

gxh4 ¢c7 54.¤g6+ ¥xg6 28.¦fc1 £d7 19.¤e1 ¢e7 49.f5 ¤a6 57.h5 gxh5 60.¢c3 a2 63.¥xd3 ¦xd3 32.¦g8+ ¢h7 39.¥c4+ ¢e7 51.d3 ¥f8 8.¤b2 ¥b5 21.¤e5 ¤f6 [ Fischer analyses 15.¦b1 ¤f7 55.¦xc5 ¥xc5 25.bxa4 ¦d6 24.£c7 33.£xd2 ¦xd2 44...h4 ¤c4 39..h3 ¥d6 17.g3 ¥g7 4.e4 a4 48.£d4? e5! 31.¢h2 c5 56.¤d7 24.¥xa2 ¤xa2+ 64.. because he found the payment too low.¦xc7+.¢h5 ¤f7 65.g6?! 20.axb4 dxc4 13.¦b1 ¥b7 11.¤a4 ¥c6! 17.¦xd7 ¤f6? [ Fischer gives the easy win 43.. ¦c8 12.£c2 ¦c8 33.¤xe6 £xe6 25.¤c5 56.. Bobby refused to participate in Amsterdam 1964.f5! gxf5 21..c4 g6 2.d4 exd4 17.c3 ¤f6 6.£c4 ¤e6 34.dxe5 ¥c5 17.. 1.£a5 ¦c5 37.¥d4 22.¦b8 ¥d5 52.h4 ¥f7 34.£xb2 ¦xd3 28.h5 ¤e8 38. ¤h5 14.¤f3 e6 6.¤e1 ¥xb2 27.b4 £c6 34..¦xf7+! ¢xf7 50.Tigran Fischer..£b3 ¤xc5 23.¥xd4+.¤c7! 44.¥f1 ¦a1 47.dxe5 ¥xe5 23. Fischer had become the greatest strategist in the history of chess.¥e4 a4 45.¤e7 ¢f6 66.fxg6 results in a draw.¦de1+ 1-0 A37 Petrosian.g5 a2 60.¤bd2 ¥g7 13.£d3 ¤d6 40.¦fe1 ¥d7 15.¤c2 ¢d7 50.fxg6 hxg6 59.b5 31.c5!? bxc5 15.cxd5 ¤xd5 11.bxc5 ¤a5 16.£xd3 ¦d8 27.¥e3 h6 15.¢c3 ¤c6 66.¤ed3?! [ 21.¤a6 ¦d6 21.d4 d5 3.£xf5 ¤d8 23.¥e2 d5 10.¤c5 ¦d5 22.¤xe6 ¦xe6 29.¥f4 ¥g4 7.e4 ¦d2 39.f5 gxf5 57.¦b5 ¦xa6 58..0-0 ¥e6 13.¤c5 ¤e7?! [ 23.0-0 ¢f8? This move sustains a white attack on the f-file.gxh5 ¢e6 61.¦dc2 ¤e6 29. 29.¢b2 ¤b4 65.¦g3 ¥g7 18.¦d2 ¤d8 25.¢f3 ¤f6 53..¦d1+ ¦fd7 37.¥d3 ¤c6 5..¥g2 ¤c6 5.¦d1 ¥d5 47.¤e4= ] 22.¤e4 £f7 16.¥f3± ] 24.¢e3 ¢d6 54.£b8+ ¢e7 39.£c7 18. [The hard fight 55.R/Lugano 1999/EXT 2000 (71)] 11.¥xf5 gxf5 33.¤e1! ¤d5 [ 19.. =2)..d4 exd4 30.¥xf5 exf5? 22.£b3 ¤a5 8.¦ac1 £e7 14.dxc4 ¦c8 The hanging pawns are vulnerable.£c2 e6 10.¤f3! ] 16. A sensation happened.hxg6 ¤xg6 41.h4 ¤d6 36.h6 1-0 Rogers.£c2 ¤b7 18.£xe6!! ¦xe6 37.¤bd2 ¤c6 13.exd5 cxd5 4.¢h1 £d7 14.¤e7 ¥e6 57.d3 0-0 8.e4 c6 2.¦xf8 ¢g6 40.My 160 Memorable Games 41 2000 (22) ] 6.¢g3 ¢e5 63.¥xd4= ] 16.¥d3 ¦ed6 32..¦a7 ¤g4+ 45.] 31.£xd5+! ] 33.£g5 ¤d6 43..¤xe5?! 16.¦a8 ¥d7 31.£a1 ¤b6 17.¥c4! ¤c5 56.£d3 ¦c4 34..fxe6 ¥f6 24. he had not encountered a top player in three years.¥xa4 20.£c4 ¤b6 32..£b1 Now 13.f5 ¤xe5 22.¢xh6 ¤g4+ 69.¥c4 d3 [ 30.¦c1 ¤d8 37.¢g7 ¤xf2 70.¢g2 ¦a2 49.0-0 g6 12.¤xc5 ¦xc5 24.¥g2 £c7 35..] 34.¤xc8 ¢d5 62.f4 ¢f8 42.¦d8 35..h5 ¤g4 71.b4?! cxb4 12.¦a1 £d2 43.Tigran USSR-World [board 2] 1970 The adventures of Fischer in Yugoslavia 1959 and Curacao 1962 have been described.a6 ¦a7 46.¤bd2 [ 11..¦c5 e4 26.a4 A novelty prevents an exchange by 11.¥xa6 £d6 40.¥f2! £c7 [Avoids 19.¥g5 ¥e7 29.¤f5 ¥e6 23.¤xg7 ¢xg7 26.£g4 ¤f8 37.¦b1 ¢f7 48.¢g1 ¦c1+ 46.a5 c6 33.¤bd3! a6 22..¢c4 ¤d4 Fischer won the minimatch with 3-1 (+2.c4 dxc4 35.¤h4 ¤d7 21.¥xa2 a3 52.gxf6+ ¢h8 28.£d7?! £xd7 43.. He started with a score of 8 1/2 / 10 in the interzonal tournament.£xd3 ¦d6 33.£a4+ ¥d7 9.¦xf5!! gxf5 35. [ 17.¥e5 [ 34.. and left! When he played a minimatch of four games against Petrosian in 1970.£e5! ¦c7 [ 32.¥c8 ¥xc8 61..g6?! 17.¦d1 ¤e8 42.¤xf5 gxh4 53.a5 £c7 18.¤c5 ¥f8 23. Sousse 1967.Nb4 needed attention.¤c5 ¥c8 20.¢g4 ¤d8 64..] 18.a6 bxa6 39.¤c3 ¤e5 68.¤d5+ ¢f5 67.£b3 defends properly (Petrosian).exf5 ¤a6! 58.¤e4 ¤f8?! [ 21.£b1 ¦ad8 16.g3 h6 35.¦xe8+ ¥xe8 32.¢h2 ¢g7 41.¥xg6 ¢e7! The last chance.a5 ¦d7 45.Robert James Petrosian.¦xc5+ ¢b6 59.¥f5 ¦ff7 36.¤d3 ¥xd3 26.¥xd7 ¦xd7 38.¥h4 ] 20.g4! ¤b4 59.f4! ¤d7 55.¥b1? Petrosian blunders.£a3 a5 38.¤f3 ¥xh4 26. ] 55.¤g2 g5 36. 14.¦g7! £f8 36..¦h3 ¢g8 40.¤xg7 ¢xg7 25.¦g8+ ¢xf7 41.a4 ¦d5 38.¦xa5 ¦d6 30.] 20.g5 ¤f5 26.¤d4 ¥e6 51.¤b6 22.¥xe7 £xe7 30.¤c5 ¦d5 20.¦ae1 £c5+ 31.£a3 ¦c3 36.Robert James USSR-World [board 2] 1970 1.IMantovani..¦f3 b6 27..¥f3 £c7 28.¥d2 d5 9.¦g7+ ¢e8 42.¤xd4 ¤xd4 18.g6 hxg6 62.] 21..¤c3 c5 3.g4 ¤b4 58.¢d2 ¢f6 62.f7! h5 38.¤xh4 ¤f6 27.exf7 ¥xf7 25.¤f3 a5 9..¥xd6+ 1-0 B13 Fischer.¦e8 7.¥b1 ¤b5 ] 44..¤a4 ¤xa4 23.f4 ¥e8 19.¥h4 ¤g8 21.¤df3 0-0 completes a normal development.f6 12. 0-1 .¦g1 ¦ad8 15.£f5 ¢d8 30.Bb5.¦ag1 ¤b6 19.¥xa6 ¢xc5 60.¥f1 ¦d2 41.¤f3 £b6 11.£c3 ¦a2 42.¥xa2 ¤xa2 61.¤e4 ¥c8 18.0-0 ¤ge7 7.g4?! [ 16.¦ed1 f5 19.¦xb7! ( F i s c h e r ) .¢h1 ¦f8 32..a3 b6 10.

£f3+.¤xf7 ¦xf7 ( 28.£e6+ B1) 25.£c7+ ¢h6 46.g3 ¤f6 4.¤g4 ( 17.¦a3 ¦xc7 20.¤xa4 ¦c2± .¦g1 ¦xe4 0-1 Costa.¦c1 £d7 16.£e5+÷ .£xa2 ¥xa2 17.£xc5+ ¢g7 44.£e2 ¦d8 23. cxd4 14.e3 [ 7.¥e2 ¥h6 10.¥xc4?! ¥xc4 12.dxe6 ¦xe6„ ) 23.h3 ¥h5 11.exf6 exf6 26.£e5+ ¢g8 29.¢e2 ( 16.EBanas.d5 ¤d7 15.f3 ¤a5 13.¤f3² ] 8. tendo provocado o avanço de e4 ao atacar o cavalo. B2b3) 28. B) 14.f3 ] 12.¦xa2 ¥xa2 20..¤c6 3.¤xa8 ¦xa8 20..¥h6 ¥xh6 20.¦d2 ¦ad8 22.£c2+ 17..£d7 ¢f7 32.¦xe2 £xe2 29.¥e2 ¦cd7 26..¢g7 B2a) 26.¥a6 ¦xc1 28.¥f1 £f7 20...¦xb4 exd4+ 1/2-1/2 Kavalek.¦xb6 ¤g4 18.¦xc1 ¤a5 29.cxb5? 10.£b5 ¦ed8 23..£xb5÷ ) 27. 26.R-Tukmakov.¦bd1 ¦ae8 22. 15.£xa7 bxa5 33.£xa2 17.¤xe3 £e5 9.f4 ( 17.¦fe1 ( 20.£e3 ¤xc4 17..0-0? f4 18.a4 ¥f6 22..¦c1 b5 23.cxd4 ¦c8 15.£c5 ¥xc3 19.b5 8.¥xf3 29.£f3 0-0 10.¥b3 b6 16.f4= ] 28...¤g3 ¤c4 18..¦a1 ¢e7 33.¦a1 ¥e6 18.¦d2 £c7 20. 21.¤d6 exd6 24.dxe5 f6 18.¤xe5 ¥xe5 22.¤b5! ¤c6 [ 15..¦c1 ¦xf3 ( 28.bxc6 ¤xc6 11.¦f1 £e4 45.Robert James Gheorghiu.£e2 ¤xc4 18.£d2 e6 15.¥e2 f5! 17.cxd4 ¤c6 10.¥g7 10.£xh6 £e7 21.0-0 ¥g4 12.£e6+ ¦f7 30.¤c4 ¦e8 12.£c1 ¥c4 29.¥b5 ¤a5 26.V/New Delhi 1986/EXT 99 (33)) 13.¦c8? 16...£d7 ¥b5 28.exd5 ¥xd2+ 21.¥e5 ¤xe5 21.£e3 ( 15.¤xe5 d6 .¥h4 ¤xc3 6.£xf4 ¦xf4 30.¤e4 £f4 29.£d2 ¥d5 17..¤e5 16.¤f3 ¤f6 [ 2.¥d5 ¥c8 14.¥f6+ ¢xf6 29.¢f2 ¦f8 31.P/ Southampton 1986/EXT 99 (30)] 12.¥d5 ¥xd5 20.¥g3 e5! 23.¥b5± ] 16.£b2 ¢h8 21.c3 ¤ge7 7.¢e3 ¢f7 32...exd5 ¤xd5 6..£h3 ¥c8 19.¦b7 ¦c2 29.PKotan.¦d1 £xf4 42.¦fd1 £d7 17.¦a1?! [ 18.exd4 £d3+ 19.¢f4 ¥h6+ 20..¤xc4 [ 11.¢d1 ¤xd4µ ) 16.¦xf6 £d4+ 0-1 Taimanov.¥f3 ¦b8 22.c5 12.£d7 21.£e5+÷ .axb5 axb5 26...1970 Defesa Gruenfeld 1.¦xe1 £f2-+ ) 29.¤c6 13.£xa2 24.¦db5 1/2-1/2 Ravisekhar.¤c7 £xa2 17.1970 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 518 Petroff 1.gxf3 ¥xe1 30..¥f6+ ¦xf6 29. 0-0 11.¤xd4 ¥c5 5.£xe7+.e4 ¥b7 13.¦fd1 ¦xd2 24.¤c2 ¥xe3 8.¦a1 ¥b3² ) 17.a5 ¥f8 28.¥a6 ¦cd8 23.Robert James Buenos Aires 08..¥g3 ¦cc8 22.¤exc4 1/2-1/2 Prandstetter.¥d5! [ 11.R-Giulian.c6?! 9..L/SVK-chT 1995/EXT 97 (15)) 3.¥xe7 cxd4 ( 16.e4 e5 2.¤e5 ¤xe5 17.¥xf3 ¦xf3 21.¥g5 £f5+µ .0-0 ¤e5 16.f4 ¥xa2 24.¦xa7 ¦fc8 27.L-Gligoric.¥xe6 £xe6 31.¤d2 0-0 11...£xb7 ¤xb7 27.¥b3 ¤e5 17.¦b2 e5 39.¥c4 ¥g7 8.¥e6 [ 7.¤xc5 ¥d5 38.d3 d5 5..08..¦a5 ¦c7 34.dxc5?! ¤d7 15.¥xc4 ¥xc4 19.¥g3! ¦cc8 22.¦xc3 ¥f1 .£a4± .£xa8 ¤c6 15.g4 f3 20.JTukmakov.h3 a4 36.£b1?! c4 22.¥xf8+ ¦xf8 28.¦b1 b6 9.¤g5+ ¢h8 30.¢h1 ¦b3 31.¦f7 27.bxc3 c5 7.¤xc4 0-0 15.dxe5 £e6 23. B2b) 26.£d2 ¦e8 16.My 160 Memorable Games 42 D80 Mecking.£e3 ¤d3+‚ ) 16.e4? c5-+ ] 7...¥f2 ¢f8 37.axb5 ¥xb5 10..£e7+ ¦f7 30. B2b2) 28. B) 8.0-0 ¥a6 20.e5 f5 27.a4 A) 8.£e3 ¦d7 24..¤e3 ¤xe3 13.d4 ¤f6 2.¥g4 £c8 21..e4 ¤xc3 6.¦b2 ¦xc7 19..axb5 £d5 ( 9...cxd5 ¤xd5 5.¥xe7 ¦xf4 B2b1) 28.c4 g6 3.¤xc4 £d5³ 13.£e3 axb6 17.¦c7 ¥f8 30.¤c7 ¤c6 19.¥xg4 fxg4 19.£a3 ¥e6 21.¥xe3 h6 14.07.¥g2 ¥e7 7..Henrique da Costa Fischer.¤e5 ¦ef8 28.exf5 xe7 ) 18..¤e5 17.¤f3 ¥xe1 27.¦c2 ¦fc8 35..£d7 13.¥d5 £f7 30..¤a5= 22.0-0± ] 18.axb6 16.¦xf4 27.¦a1 e5 24.¦f2 £d7 21..£xa3 ¦a8 39.exd4 4..¥d7 9.0-0 ¤d7 14.¥xh4? 29.¦fd1 ¥a6 17.Florin Buenos Aires it 21.£f3 £xc4! 14.£xa2 ¥xa2 18.¦fe1 f5 19.£c1 ½-½ C42 Fischer.¦xb3 ¥xb3 21.¤c3 ¦xd2 19.¥a6 ¦cd8 23.£g3 ( 23.¦d7 £xe4 35.M-Fischer.d4 ( 3....f3 £a4!? 15.¤e2 cxd4 9..b5 28...¥e3² As pretas...£d3 £d7 /\ Qa4 ) 15.) 29.£d6 ¦b2 30.¥e3 £f6 6.S/Lugano 1970/ MCD (39) ] 4.¥e2 cxd4 ( 12.¤xf3 ¥xg4-+ ) 17...£xg4 ¥xc3 25.¦c5 ¦xc5 37.¦b2 ¥e6 19.0-0 ¤c6 15.£d6 ¦c8 27..bxc3 dxc4 7..g3 b4 36.£c1! ¦ac8 18.0-0 '~~' Ftacnik.£xd2 £e8 25.¥c4 ¥e6 12.£xd5 ¥e7 25.¤e5 ¥g7 12.¥g3 £b7 19.¤a3! c5 14..¤e4 5.a4 c5 16.¤d2 d6 11.0-0 ¥xc4 13.¤xc4 ¥a6 .£b7 £xc3+ 16.¥xc4 c5 A) 14.¥xe7!? ¥xd2 ( 26.£b2 ¢e8 40.e4 £c6 34.¤f7 18.exf6 £xf6 28.£d2 ¥e7 29.¥xc4 ¦xc4 26..) 10.¥xc5 ¥xc5+ 43.£f3 ¥d5 12.¦d1 ¢f7 28.0-0± ] 21. B2) 25.¤f3 [ 9.£xa2? 16.f4 ¥d5 13..¦e1 ¥f6 9.£g3 ¦ae8÷ ) 20.g4 ¥g6 15..¦d5 b4 33.¢xd2 ¦xa2+‚ ..¥xe5 ¥xe5 24.dxe5 ¦d8 25.a4 a6 25.¤e5 16.¢f3 ¤xd4+ 18.¢h1 £a4! 23.V/Luzern 1993/CBM 38/[Ftacnik] (29)] 11.. A2) 15..¥f1 f5 20.¤bd2 ¥g4 10.£b5 ¢f8 41.¦bc1 ¦ac8 18. 11.0-0 0-0 8.¤xc4 ¥a6 18.£b3 19.¦xa7 1-0 Ravisekhar.¦xe1÷ .0-0 ( 16.£e8+ ¢g7 31.J/Trnava 1981/MCD (13)] 3.£xe8 ¦xf3! ..£c1 ¥c4 27.£d2 e4 1/2-1/2 Demeter.¦f7 26.¤f3 c6 11.¤f3 ¥e2 27.¥g5 [ 4.h3 b5 32.¥g3 ¦cc8= ..¦a1 ¥c4 25.c4 a3 38.£c2 ¥b3 30.£xe8 ¥xd2 29.cxd4 ¦c2 18.cxd4 ¥d5 14.¥g3 £e6 18.£d2 [ 12..cxb6 A1) 15.¥f6+ ¦xf6 28..£c2 ¥b3 [ 27.. iniciam logo o contra-ataque pelo centro.¤c3 d5 4.£a3?! [ 21..R/Vancouver 1971/ Candidates (46)] 9.

¥xb5 ¢c7 22.¦a6 ¢c7 51.¥e3 has more effect.¦f4+ ¢d5 75.¢f6 Taimanov lost again.c5! ] 0-1 16.¥b3!? ¤b5+ 56.e4 d6 5.¦b5 ¤f7 66.¤fxd5 17.¦c7 £a4 30.¤xc3 ¢d8 14.¥xe3 ¦e1 [ C o r r e c t i s 16.¢g4 ¤e5+ 69.12-2.¥xc3 ¦xc3 32.¤d3 82.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 Black has taken over the attack.e4 c5 2.b4 ¥e4 30.¥b7+ .Robert James 2740 26.] 16.h3 ¦f8 28.¢b2 axb4 37.£d2 ¤xe4 10.¢f1 ¢h7 35.¦e3 ¦b8 28.c4 ¤c6 10.¦xb1 ¦xb1+ 35..exf5 gxf5 12.¢h2 £d7 White has no real 10.¥e2 e5 7.f Vancouver 1971 73.¢g3 ¦g7 74..¦c1 f5 11.£h3 ¤f6 21.bxc5+ 51.¢d3 ¤c4 ] 36.¥xh6 ¤e4 34.£d4 £f6 25.h3 ¦f4 42.cxd5 cxd5 24.¤f3 0-0 6.£a3 ¦b7 22.d4 cxd4 4.f Vancouver 27.¤e4 ¤xe4 17.Mark E 2620 refutes this idea.¢b2 d3 33.0-0 ¦e8 9.c4 g6 3.¥xg6 ¤f6 55.¤g3 £c7 37.¦c5+ Taimanov.¦e6 £c5+ 25. h6 13.bxc5 ¤e8! 52.bxc5 ¤e8 53.0-0-0 b6 41.¥b7 21.d4 ¤f6 2.¥e3 ¤f6 8.¤d3 83.¤d4 £d7 Fischer.¦f2 h5 45.¦e2 ¥f6 23.19] 1-0 34.f4 e4 17.¦d1 d4 31.d4 ¤f6 2.¦fd1 e4?! 21.c4 g6 3.¤f3 (Botvinnik).¦a7+ ¢d8 50.f Vancouver 1971 exf4 23.¥g5 £a5+?! ¥c6! 31.¥c3 as good for White.¢g2 £g7+ ¤xc3 13..¥d2 ¤e8 83.¦c8 £e7 9. ¦b6 29.¤c3 h6 11.¥f5 ¤f3 86.¦xd8 £f6 33.¥xh6+ ¢f7 32.¤c6 £b6 39.h4 ] 50.¥c2 a5 20.¤f3 31.h4 ¤f3 84.¦e1 ¤d6 35.¦d1 ¢c7 41.Mark E 2620 23.¤1c3 £d7 38.¥e2! ¥d7 19.¦g6 ( B a l a s h o v ) ¦xg6 54.¥xf7 ¥c3 29..Mark E 2620 ¢d4 67.c5? [ White misses the s u b t l e w i n 50.¥f4 e5 7.exf5 gxf5 13.¥d5! White threatens 27.¢g4 ¤e5+ E97 63..¥a6?! Heroic play leads to difficulties.¥g4 ¢e4 1..¤f3 ¤xe4 5. 20. 28.¤xd5 ¤xd5 18.h5 10.¤g5!? Taimanov ¤g5 85.My 160 Memorable Games 43 4.£d2! one.£h4 ¥b7 23.¤g5 ¤f6 14.£a4 £c1+ 28.¢f4 ¦g6 58.¢xg5 ¦g6+ Fischer.¢e3 ¢xc5 57.£xa5 ¤xa5 11.¥xe2 ¤d6 40.and 82.£xe6 17.¤f3 ¤g6 and now 17.£e3 1971 Black has allowed a blockade of the centre.¦g3 ¥xh6 33..¢f5 ¦f7+ Fischer won the interzonal Palma de Mallorca 1970.¢c3 ¢d7 47.¥e2 ¦fb8 33..¤xa7 £xe3 40.a3 Fischer exerts pressure for a pawn.Re7+.e4 d6 5.¤xf5 ¦b1 0-0 6.¤d4 ¤c5 19.¦a2 ¤c7 53.¦e1 £d8 21.¦f1 ¦e4 43. exf4 17.¦a8 f3 39.¥xe4 ¤a6 18.¦xe8 £xe8 13.¦c8+! 36.f3 [2.¥d3 ¦e5 44.c5 bxc5+ 52.¤xh6 ¦b4 32.¥g7+ ¢h7 35..¤d4 ¦e8 27.g3 15.¤b5 ¥e5 37.b3 b5 29.¦de1 ¦ac8 24.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¢g5 ¦g7+ 79.d4 ¥e7 6.¤f3 £e7 24.¢d4 ¢c7 49.¦e3 b6 22.¥c4 ¦hf8 25.¥d1 ¦g8 72. 36.¤c3 ¥g7 4.¦f6 ¦xf6+ 81.h3 0-0 8.¤b5 d6 6.¥d1 h4 59.¢g5 ¤d6 61.d5 ¤b4 16.¥d2 d5 30.¢f4 ¢d4 64.£xb7 ¤f6 18.¤e6 £d7 24.¥e3! 34.gxf3 ¥xh2 40.¢f5 ¦h6 60.¦a6 ¤e5 77.¢f1 ¦fd8 26.cxb5 ¥xb5 30.¤b5 ¥e6 15.¦hd1 ¥xb5 21.¥h5?! [ 16.d5 ¤e7 9.0-0 ¤c6 8.¢xf6 ¢e4?? [ The nicest draw His opponent in the quarterfinal was Taimanov.¤xd4 e6 27.¥f5+ ] 83.0-0 ¤c6 8.dxe6 £c8 15.¥f4 d5 E97 Taimanov.Robert James 2740 70.¦f5 g5+ 68.c4 ¦g5 46.£xf6 gxf6 26.¢f5 ¢d6 1.¢g6 ¤f3 88. 80.] 82.¥d2 ¤e8 34.¤b5 ¤g6 25.¥c2 ¤f7+ 62. but f4! Fischer..¤d4? [ 36. £b4 38.¤f5 ¥d7 31.. b6 12.£d2 £c8 15.¤f3 [ Commentators regard B44 20.£b3! Taimanov diverts from game attack.£b3 c6! 1-0 16.] 20.c3 ¦h4 39.¢f2 ¥f8 29.¢f4 ¦f7+ 78. gives 81.¥f4 ¥d7 14. ¢d7 12.¦b4+ ¢c3 65.£d6+ 37.d5 ¤e7 9.¢xh2 £e5+ 42.¥xf4 1...¦e8?! 5..¦g3 ¢h8 23.] 36.fxe5 dxe5 16.f4! He avoids the capture on d6.Robert James 2740 22. ¤e5+ 89.¢xh4 ¦xg2 71.h7 plays actively against Fischer's favourite opening.¢g1 16.¦c6!? ¢h8 Taimanov thinks for one hour and fourteen minutes..¦d2 ¥e7 20.¥c8! ¢f4 [Pointes are 82..£xc6 £xc6 32.¥c4 ¢d7 54.¦a2 ¢c8 48.¦b2 ¢c6 55.¤xg7 £xg7 Taimanov.¦xg7+! ¢xg7 1.¥e2 ¦fb8 19. 1.b4 a5 26.¥e2 e5 7.¦c1 f5 11.£a6 ¦xb2 20.¤f3 ¤c6 3..¦d1 £e7 24.¢xc3 dxe2 .h4 ¤f4 83.¦g6 ¤f4! 22.a3 ¦fd8 The pawn is returned for activity. ¢b8 27.¥xf4 0-1 ¤b7 18.¦e1 ¥f8 12.cxb6 axb6 19.f4 h6 keeps an effective defence line.¥h5 ¤b5+? [ Correct ia 35.axb4 ¦d4 38.h6 ¤g5 87.¥d3 ¤f6 7..¦a4 ¤g6 76.c5? Taimanov plays too hasty. ¢h7 1.¤d4 ¥g7 36.¤e6 ¥xe6 14.

¥d5 £f7 30.¢d6 37. Taimanov had a book of a dissident in his luggage.a4! ¤e7 34.¤c3 e6 6.¦e1 leads to positional problems (Tal).f4! 1.¥c4! ¤c6 60..¢e2 ¢d8?! [Or 42.c3 a5 33.¥xe6 fxe6 17.£d6 £a5!? (Rodriguez-Palermo.] £c8 21.£xa7 bxa5 33.¦f1 £e4 Taimanov collapses B44 2740 2620 1971 1.dxe5 f6 18.g4+ fxg3 30.e4 e6 2..¥e3 ¥g4 14.¦fe1 ¦xd5 20..¥f1 a5 26.¦xe5? 24.dxe5 ¤cxe5 15.f4 ¥d5 13.b3 b6 and he gets the time for ..e4 £c6 34.£h5+ ¢d7 supports the black development.£c7! ] 18.¥b5 ¦d6 42.b4! axb4 66..£xd2 £e8 25. Buenos Aires 1973).f Vancouver ¢g7 44.g3 ¦c4 29.¦d2 ¦f4 28.¦ad1 £f5 20.¥e2 20.¥h5 ¢f7!? 18.¦xd6 ¢xd6 45.a4 ¤bc6 8.¥e2 f6 12.My 160 Memorable Games 44 Fischer.¥g4+ ¢e5 .e4 c5 2.¦e1 Fischer.Mark E 2620 9.¤e5 ¥g7 12.¤e2 ¦a4 30.¢xb6 ¢d7 64.£xd1+ £d7 23.¢c4 ¢c6 49.¢xc5 ¤e7 65.¥xc5 ¥xc5+ 43.¦xf6?? completely.¥b3! ¢a7! 55.b6 A wonderful endgame.¦d5 f5 38.¤c3 ¥b4 4.£e2 [ 17.¦d2 ¦f6 39.¦d1 £e5 23.a4 c5 16.¤1c3! a6 10..£d2 ¥e7 29..¢f3 ¤d7 29.] 17.¥xg6! ¤xg6 63.f Vancouver 1971 13..cxb4 ¤c8 67.¥f2 ¢f8 37.¢g2! ¦a8 39.¥d1 ¢b7 56.¤f3 c6 11.c3 ¤c6 32.exf5 ¤xf5 14.¤d4 b4 34.¤xd4 £c7 5.¤b5 ¦a2 42. £d4+ 0-1 Fischer.f Vancouver B47 2740 2620 1971 1.a6 ¤c8+ 71.£xd4 ¥c5 10.¦fd1 ¦xd2 21.¦xd4 exd4 21.¦xd4 d5 26.¥f4 e5 7.¥c1+ f4 28.¥f3! ¥c6 23.Robert James 2740 ¤g6?! [Less risk takes 12.h3 a4 36. but Sherlock Fischer o u t w i t s W a t s o n T a i m a n o v .¦d1 £xf4 £d4! (Suetin) 31.] 25.¤c4 f5 13..¥f3+ ¢c7 57.¤xd4 e6 5.¥d6! £c8 22.¦ad1 e5 13.£xd7+ ¢xd7 24.¢d3 ¤e7 46.£b2 ¢e8 40.¥e6 21.0-0 £g5 19.¦b1 b6 9.c4 ¢c6 [More resistance offers 36.¥xc5 dxc5 15.axb4 axb4 36.¢b5 ¤c8! 51.0-0 ¤xd4 9..¦xe6 ¦xe6 ¥h6 10.¤xe5 ¤xe5 16.¦e2 ¢d7 40.d4 cxd4 4.¥e8+ ¢b7 50.Bent 2.¥a3 fxe5 14.¥e8 ¢d5 47.¥c4 ¦f8 27.dxe5 0-0 ] 1...d5 22.¤f3 ¤c6 3.£e2 ¦xd1+ 22.£d2 h6 12.£d5+ ¦e6 24.¥f7! ¢b7 54.¥c6+ ¢c7 52.£e2 ¦d8 23.Re8 (Radulescu).£xa3 27.¥g5 ¤e4 5.¤e5 ¤xe5 21. ¦he8 19.¢c4 ¦f6 45.£b5 ¢f8 41.h3 ¤c6 35.a5 ¤d6 68.¢xg3 £xa1 32..0-0 c4 11.f3 ¥e6 16.¢g2 b5 32..¥e3 ¤f6 8.a5 23.¤d5 ¥xd5 18. ] ¤d7 14..c4 g6 3.¥xe6 £xe6 £e3+? Larsen misses the draw in the complicated 31..] 22..¦xe5 £xe5 [ Not 24.0-0 22.Mark E 1.f4 e5 40.£xd7 ¦ad8 25.exd5 e4 19.e5 ¤e7 5.exf6 exf6 26.¦f1+ (suetin).¢c6 ¢b8 71.£xd5+ ¢f6 [Avoids 20.¥f7 ¤e7 61.e3 ¥e6 8..f5! exf5 ¤xc3 6.£xb7 ¥f8 28.¦xe4+ ¢d8 21.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥xf5 ¦xc4 16.¦c2 dxc4 38..¦f6 43.¤e4 ¥e7 [ 21.¦d2 £c7 20.£c7+ ¢h6 46.¥f4 d6 11.fxe5 13..¥f3 ¦b8 22.¤b3 ¥b6 35.£d4+ 17. 9.¥d3 ¦c8 15.¤b5 d6 6.¦xc4 e5 ] 37.¦d3+ ¢c7 31.¢c5 White wins on the kingside.¥d5 ¤e7 53.¢d3 ¦d6+ 44.¦b2 ¥e6 19.h4+! ¢f5! 29.Robert James Taimanov.¦d3! ¢c7 44.¦d4? Taimanov fails again. [Correct is 17.bxc3 dxc4 7.£d4 ¢g6 23.¦d3+ ¢c7 37.. He was arrested in Moscow.£xc4+ gives fine winning chances.¤a3 ¤d4 12.c6+ ¢c8 41.¦d3 and the exchange has been forced.£c6+! ¢g5 £xe4 35.] 17.¦e3 g6 41.¦xd5 ¦xb2+ Fischer had won the match over ten games with 6-0. It was a sensation. h5 36.¥e8 ¢d8 Black seems to escape..g3 a6 7.£xc5+ 45.¥g5 ¥e6 Taimanov plays the main variation this time.¤g3 £f6 23.a4! a5 26.h4! White threatens to advance his pawns on the kingside.¦e5 b6? [ Black ends the pressure in the endgame with 24.¥f3?! [ 21.¥h4 Fischer attacks in a lovely way.£xc3 26.¦e3 ¦d6 48.c4 a3 38.¤f3 ¥d7 Taimanov.¥g4 ¢f7 24..¦e3 ¢d6 33.£d3 ¦f8 24.£xf5+ ¦f6 23.¤d6 70. 1-0 42. 1-0 Fischer.¥g2 ¤f6 8.e4 c5 2.¥f7+ ¢d6 48..¤d4+ ¢d7 39.£d6 ¦c8 27.Robert James Taimanov.¥d6 ] 24.Robert James Larsen.f5 ¥d8 43.Mark E 1.¥d3!? £c7 10..f4 ¦d8?! [Theory will become 16.¦e1 ¦d6 46.. [C o r r e c t i s 25.¤c3 ¥c5 27.¤e5! 22.¤c3 d5 4.¢a6 ¤c8 58. 62.¦d7 skirmish.¦e3 ¤b8 30.a3 ¢d7 31.d4 ¤f6 2.£xd4 £xd4 25.] 43.£d7 ¢f7 32.¢b6 ¢c8 [After 69.¤xc4 0-0 15.] 70..¥d5! ¤e7 59.d4 d5 3.¢g2 ¢d6 28.bxc3 c5 7.c5 ¥c7 38.a3 D80 ¥xc3+ 6.d4 cxd4 4.£d4! ¤g6 17.¢d6! 25.f Denver C19 2760 2660 1971 1.¥xf6 gxf6 11.b5 ¤e4+ 69.0-0 17.¦e2! ¦f6 47.

f4 ¥d7 10.e4 d6 6.¤h4! 31.¢e2 ¦a7 34.Bent 2660 ¥a6 42.¥e3 0-0 11.£a4 ¥d7 15.c4 c5 2.¤f5 £c7 14.¦g5+ ¢h6 30.b5! axb5 32.Qf6 £e6 19.cxb5 ¥d7 35.£a3 ¥h6! Black prevents f4.¦xf2 b5 31.£e7+.] 16.cxb5 ¥d5 28.My 160 Memorable Games 45 33.¥b6 £xc2 36.e4 c5 2..a5 £b2 [ 36.a4 f5 13...¦c8 ¦b1+ 54..¢h1! (Murey) ¤h4 28.¤b6 £e8 /\ 19.¤g3 fxg2+ 31.0-0± ] B88 7.¦g1 ] 27.¦e4 f5 22.g4 ¦a8 36.£f3 ¥f5 ( 10.¥b3 ¥e7 8.Bent 2660 prevent this move.¥c4 e6 [ 6.¤xc6 bxc6 8.£c6 [No matter loses 12.¥d5 Larsen.¥c4 e6 7.. ¦c8 14.¢xg2 £d2+ 1-0 31.¦f1 f5 32.Bent Fischer.f5 £c8? 12.¢g7? 30..£a2! offers the last chance.¥c4? [Equality keeps 37.¥xe6 fxe6 36.. 9..¥d4 ¥xd4 19..¥e6 ) 30.¦f1 £e7! 27.£d3 fxe4 14.¦g3 g6 18.¥xf7++.¦d7 b6 48.b4 23.dxe5 11.¥b7 £c5 40.e4 17.c3 ¥h4 24.¤xd4 ¤c6 5...a3 a6 16.¦f2 £e1+ ¦ce8 23.¥d3 £d4+ 22.¦f8+ ¢g7 35.¦h4+ 30.¥g2 ¦b2 47.¦g1+ ¢f6 34.¤de4! ¥xc1 21.¦xg7+ ¢h8 Larsen.¦h8# 19.¢h1 [Or 29.¥f3 ¦xa3 44.¦af1 ¤c4 27.Robert James 2.¤xd4 ¤f6 5..¦xd6 [ 19.) 9.0-0 ¤c6 8.b5 axb5 34.¦b1? [ White pieces are properly placed ¦g8 29.¥xa7 g5 35.¤e2?! [ The thematic defence £e5! Fischer defends well.¤e2 exf4 26.¤c3 d6 7..Robert James 2760 1-0 2.¦xe6 £c8 21.¤d5 ¤xd5 20.f Denver 1971 1.Irving 22.f Denver 1971 45..¤c3 ¤c6 6.a5 ¤f6 14.¥e3 0-0 £c6? 17.¥f4 ¥xf4 27.¦b1 ¤e8 11.¢h2 ¢f4 4.¤d2 c5 10.¦ae1! 5.¥xb5? 33.¦xe4 d5 19.¥f5 ¤e5 18.a6 £a3 E97 Larsen..f4 25.¥xf7 ¦xh4+ 40..g6 0-1 C h e r n e v .¥f1 ¥f3 51.¥xb3 Chernev.¦eg1! ¦e7! B88 38.¤f3 g6 3.f Denver 1971 positional sacrifice.¦xe7 ¥e6 20.¦b6 ¤xd4+ 38.. I r v i n g 7.¦b1 c3 41.£g4 ( 18.¥xf7+ ) 11.Irving c5 2.¦f1 ends with a perpetual.d4 ¤f6 4.¢g7 0-1 29.¥g5 20. despite the exchanges.¦a4 38.¤f3 d6 3..cxd4 ¦xf2 30.bxc5 bxc5 18.¤a4! ¦b8 15..Bent 2660 39.¦d1 ¦a4 43.0-0 ¥d7 10.¤xf6+ ¦xf6 22.£d2 ¢h7 12.¥e3 £c3 24.¥xd4 exf5 13.] 28.] 26.£xd4 ¥g7 9..¦b6 ¥c8 24.¦xe6 9.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¥d3 £c7 1.dxe4? C h e r n e v .¢g2 ¢xg5 41.¤f3 ¥g7 3.¥xd2 31..£f4 ¦ae8?? 18.¦g3+ ¢f8 in 27.f4 £c8?! Fischer.d4 cxd4 52.¦fxc1 ¦af8 h6 10.¥xe6+ ¢h8 17.¥f4 24..g3 £xd5 25.e5! ¤g4 ( 8.¦e2 28.¦c6 £g7 Black's attack has become very gxf5 28.£f2+ ¢e5 35.¥xf5+ ¢h6 ( 29.¥f4 [ 16.] 37.¦h3+ ¢g8 24. but Fischer plays it anyway as a 2.exd5 18.f5 ¥d7 17.£e1+ ¢d5 ¤b5 37.£xd5 £e2 21. I r v i n g 20.¥e2 ¤xd4 8.£g3 g6 19.¥e6 ¦a8 28.¥a7 ¦be8 # ] 17.f3! ( 32.¥h3! ¦g7 31.d4 cxd4 4.¥e4 ¤f5 ¥e5? [Correct is 25.¥h3 ¥g4 50.¦d8 ¥e2 49..b3 ¤a3 fxe4 23.h4 e6 31.£xh7+! ¢xh7 23..fxe6 ¥xe6? (Janosevic-Musil.¦c1 Fischer.¦xf5 ¦xa3 ] 37..¤xe6 fxe6 14.¢h1 ¦xc6 32.¢xg2 ¤d2 White has won a pawn (Joop Piket).¥c5! ¦f2+ 29.Robert James 2760 Chernev.¥xf5 ¥xf5 39.f Denver B36 2660 2760 1971 .£c6+ ¦e6 40.¢g1 ¦xg2+! 30.£xe7 ¤e8 ] 13.dxe5? 9.¦xf4 26.£xe7? ¦fe8 19.¦d8 b4 36.] 24.¥b3 ¥e7 8.¦xd6 ¦a2+ 2.¢f1 ¦d2 27.¦f1 £d2 30.f4! ¤g6 25..£h4 29.¥f4 £b6 10.¥d8+ ¢e6 38.¦f3 [Faster will end 16. 27.exd6 exd6 12.¦g3! g6 33.¦b8 ¥e4 1.¥e2 e5 7.0-0 ¥e6 13.c4 g6 2.£d3 ¥f5 29.¢h1 ¤xf4 28.g6 ¥f6 26.¦h4+ ¢g5 34....¢g1 ¢f4 46.¦b4! ) 33..d4 cxd4 4.¦d1 ¤xg2! ] 29.b4 b6 12.¤xd4 ¤f6 15..¦xf5? [The king is attacked by 28.¦f1 16.Robert James 2760 ¥xb5! 39.¢d4 ¢f7 41.£xe4 ¤f3+ ¢g5 34.¥e3 0-0 9.¦f2 £b5 23.¦d4! ¥e6 35.£h4 ¥xc2! ) 18.¢g1 ¥xe4 32.£d4 £h5 £xc2 22..¢f1 g6 32.Irving 17.¦xe6 a5 and perpetual check...¦e1 £xe4 [ 17.gxf5 exf5 37.f5! Larsen wanted to Larsen.¦e3 £f5 21.¤xf4 ¤xe4 20.¤xe4 £xe4 21.Irving: ''!'' ¤xd4 12.¥xb3 Chernev.¢d3 ¤xe6 39..£h4 ¥d5 20.¤f3 d6 3.exf5 gxf5!? 19.b3 £a5 15.¥xc6 £xc3 33.¥xh6 £xd2 25.¥c2 a6 ¤f6 6.¤xe4 ¤xe4 1. Yugoslavia 1972).¦ae1 ¥c6 19.e5! ] 26. 16.¦e3! strong.Gipslis ] 18.¥a6 ¢e3 53.Irving: ''Larsen'' 11.e4 Chernev.¥b6 Fischer.d5 ¤e7 Fischer plays his beloved defence.¤c3 0-0 5.¦xf4 £e1+ 29.¦e1 ¦f7 33. Chernev.fxe6 13.¦xe6 33.£c5+ ¢f6 34.f4 Fischer starts an attack. 18.0-0 a6 11.£xe4 ¥e6 16..

¦xf7 ¢xf7 31. R c 6 ' ' ¥e5 31.£xc3 24.¦f4 [ 30.¤xd5 11.Irving 26.£h5+ ¢e7 33..Ke2 ¦ce8 28.¥f7 b3 46.¢e6 Fischer played a fantastic endgame. then in the 17th and 19th gaames he switched to the Sicilian and lost both.¥c8 32.fxe5 ¤xe5 21.¦e8+ ¢g7 Again Fischer had won with 6-0..¦b6 ¤a4 54. Petrosian adopted the Petroff in games 13 and 15 and obtained comfortable though uninteresting draws in 25 and 19 moves respectively.£xe8+ ¤xe8 31..c3 0-0 9.¦xd5 Chernev.¦xe1 ¥d5 40.] 24.a6 / \ 4 2 . ] 30.¥d2 Chernev.¤xd4 a6 Introducing a system named in various countries after the German master.¥b7! JvR 12.¦xh5 ¦c1 52.] 21.Irving: ''!'' ¦d3 32..¦xf7+ ¥f6 22.¤g4 28.a4 ¢f8 39..c4 a5 25.dxc4 9..¢e3+.a5 ¥c5 41.] 33.£xe1 £e8 30.Bent Fischer. 5.b4 cxb4 35.g3 ¦fe8 27. Louis Paulsen (1833-91)..Robert James 2.¥f6 ] 24.£e2 ¦e8 28.d6 ¦c2+ 37.£f4 ¥g7 23.¦xb7 ¦ac8 [Larsen prefers 23. I r v i n g ¦e4+= ] 35.¤c3 ¥c5 12.¥xb7 ¤d6 33.T/Moscow 1969/ MegaBase 97 (56)] 8.¦xa4 ¦a1 0-1 Spassky.¦h6+ ¢e5 53..£e2 ¥e7 10.b3 0-0 11. the latter being in a shattering 24 moves.cxd5 ¥xc3 35.e4 ¥g7 4.axb4 ¦xd7 28.Irving: ' ' ! ' ' / \ 3 1 .a4 15.¥b4 Chernev.h5 ¦c2+ 49.] 20. Irving: '/\.¢d4 ¢d6 42.¢f3 ¦xb2 might draw.¦xe6! C h e r n e v .£xf6 £xc3 26.Irving 33.£f2 axb3 19.¢xc3 ¢e7 41. Kan Variation 1.bxc3 ¦xc3 36.¤a3 ¤ge7 8.¦e7 ¥d6 23..¥e2 ¤c6 5. 1-0 Larsen.¥xd5 21.] 40.¦f4 d3 39..¥d5+ ¢g7 34.axb3 ¦a2 20...¦xd1 ¤f6 11.0-0 d6 6.c4 ¦ae8 25.¤f3 g6 3. In his 1969 match defending his world title.¢h1 [ Larsen avoids 27.¥c5! 26.] 27.¦xa5 ¢f8 35.¦a6+.¥c3 ¥xc3 [ 39.c6 ¦c2 37. Had he retained the nerve to bore his audiences.¦d4 d2 40.¥f6 ¥xf6 25..¦xa5 ¦xa5 37.¥xc4 ¦xc4 35.¦de1 £g7 25.¤d7 14.¤c2 ¦b8 16.¦g7+ ¢h8 24.¥b4+.Robert James Petrosian... is credited with dove-tailing the ideas into its present workable shape.£f4 ¥b7 24.f5 The game can end peacefully.¤d4! Larsen gives a pawn for the attack.¢f1 ¦e7 28. '=' Chernev.¥xf6 ¤xf6 18.¦xd4! 27..£e5 ¥a6 15.. B d 4 + .exf5 ¥f6 17.My 160 Memorable Games 46 21...¤xd4 b5 12.£xh7+ leads to a perpetual (Suetin).h3 £e7 22.e4 JvR c5 History is to repeat itself..¥xf6+ ¢g8 23... I r v i n g : ' ' ! ' ' ¥xg3 [ 21.¥xc4 ¦xc4 31.a5 f6 43. 31.¥g5 e5± ] 9. I r v i n g : ' ' [ ] ' ' [ Larsen does not believe in 25.¤xc6 bxc6?! [ 6.e5 ¥f8 18.a3 ¥d2 27..a5 after the game.£h6 ¥b7 34..¦c5 36.Irving 40.¥c3 ¦cxc4 [ 33.exd5 cxd5 16. The Russian.Irving: ''/\ 30. 2.1971 The Complete Games of Bobby Fischer by Wade and O'Connell # 747 Simple Chess by Michael Stean 3.¢f2 but Chernev.¥b2 a5 12.¦d7 ¥b4 26.¥xc5 ¦xc5 27.¥d3 ¤c6 6.£h6 ¥d7 30..£e3 ¦e7 36.f Denver A02 2660 2760 1971 1.a6 ¢c6 44.£d4 c5 23.¥d5 ¦xc4! 30.exd5 exd5? Fischer thought for 20 minutes and played: [JvR: Correct is 10.Irving 22..] 22. 25.£d8+ ¢g7 30.¤f3 e6 3.¤d2 ¤f6 9..¦ad1 ( 13..¤xe6 £f6! 35..¦d7+ ¢f6 43.¦ff1 ¦f7 33.fxg6 fxg6 21.£g5+ ¢f7 because he wants to lose.¦e6+ ¢d4 55.¥xf7+ ¢f8 29.¥e3 a6 10.B-Petrosian. who was second to Morphy in the first American Congress (1857)..¤f6 [ 8.f5! e5 15..¥g5 ¦d5 22.¥e4! ¥e7 ( 11.¤xg5 ¦xe1 39.¢xd2 ¥xb2 34.fxe6? Chernev.¦xd2 ¤e4 42.¥e4 ¦xd2 32.¤d7! 13.¦xd5 exd5 29. dxe5 20.£e3 d4 26. 0-1 Fischer..f4 c5 2.a3 ¤a5 17.f5 exf5 16..b4 ¤c6 19.10.¦ad1 ¦d8 15.d4 cxd4 11.g5+ ¢xg5 47.] 31..¥a2 gxh5 51.Kd4' ¦fc8 28.bxa5 favours White..¥xc4 £xd1 10.¥a3 Chernev..c5 ¤f5 36. he might have retained his championship.£f6+ because he wants to win.¦xh7 ¦c1+ 44.dxc6! ] 7.¥d6 42.£f2 ¦xe1 29.¥c5 ] 26. h4'' 30..Tigran V Buenos Aires cf B42 2760 2640 19. Ilya Kan.] 27.h5 gxh5!? [ 26.¦e4+ ¢c5 56..g4 ¤d6 38.¢e2 ¦d4 [ 32.£a4+ £d7 . The aim of a6 is to fianchetto Black's queen B after b5 with latent effect on White's centre. an incredible result.£g5+! ¢f7 32.¦xe7 ¦fe8 leads to a defendable endgame (Gipslis)..¢h1 £e3 t r i e s t o w i n .¤f3 ) 13.¦a6 Chernev.h4+ ¢f6 48.¢f2 /\ 28.¦xd2+ Chernev.£e6+ £f7 27.¤xc6 ¤xc6 13.£g4 g6 ) 13.Irving 34....a7 ¢b7 45..¥xg4 hxg4 29.Irving.¦c7++...£d2 £c7 14. but 24. Paulsen was the pioneer of many modern opening systems.cxd5 cxd5 10.¥xe5? C h e r n e v .¥xe6+ ¦f7 23.¦a7 Black can grab h i s l a s t c h a n c e w i t h a n a t u r a l m o v e .0-0 d5 8.] 34.h4?! ¦b7 [ Risk takes 23.¥b3 ¦xc6 41.£f6? [Larsen avoids 31.£g5+ £xg5 38.¢g2 ¤c5 45.c4! ''!'' '# ' [ 8.¦xa5 ¦c2+ 32..¦de1 ¦d6 37.¥xd5 ¥d6? [ 20.¥f6 ¦e3 29.c4 ( 14..f4! g6?! ( 12.¥c3 ¦ac8 25.d4 cxd4 4.¥xa5 ¥xb2 38.£xe5 ¦d3 28.¢f3 b2 50.¢d5 h4 46. R x g 6 + o r 3 1 . ¥c7? C h e r n e v .exd5 cxd5 14.d3 e6 7.¤xe6 fxe6 28..¢d3 [ 35.£g5 £d4+! 29. Weak Pawns Sicilian Defence.a3 ¦e7 27..¥xe5 ) 14.¦f3+.¥c3 h5 Chernev.

¦c1 ¤b3 25.bxa3 £a5 14.¦d2 ¦hd8 20.¦ed1 ( 23.¤a3 d5 Petrosian diverts from the sixth match game FischerTaimanov.¢h2 ¤c6 31..a3 ¦b6 ] 21.h5 f4 37.¦g8+ ¦f8 37..¢d4 ) 30.¥xc6 ¢xc6 34.¥c5 ¦b7+ 73.¥xd5 exd5 18.¦d6+ ¢e8 79.a5 ¦a1+ 30.¦b6+ ¢c8 92..¥xe4 ¦c8 16.gxh3 ¥xa3 38.¥xd7 ¦xd7 32.¦e7 .¥f7+ ] 1-0 Fischer.¤e5 Fischer had won his last twenty games in the interzonal and candidates' matches..¦h8 ¦xa7 36..0-0? 14.¦xg2 A fine endgame brings 17.£xd3 ¤d4 19.d4 cxd4 4..¢f2 ¢d8 31.b5! axb5 29.£e3 £xe3+ 19.¥f6 ¢c7 88.¦e2 ¤d4 29..cxd3 ¦c2 24.¢c5 ¦f7 91..¢e4 ¦d6 60.A/ISR-ch 1984/MCD (38) ] 17.¦e3 ¤c2 30. 25. Budapest 1995).e3 c5 6.¥d7 A) 13.¥c4! ¤c6 35.¥b5 d4 33..¦h3! ¦xe5 31.¦xf8# .¦ee2 h5 28. 20.¥e5 ¦f7 66.¦ee7 .¢e6 ¦e7+ 1/2-1/2 Averbakh.£xd7+ ¢xd7 15.¦b6 ¦h1 63.¦ee7 ¦f6 ] 28.¦e1+ ¢d6 ] 20.¥d4 ¦e7+ 80.¦c1 ¤e4 8.] 34.h6 ¦h4 38. 33.¤d7 30.¦xa7 ¢xa7 38..¢c6 ¦c7+ 93...h5 ¦g4 37.¦d6+ ¢c8 69..¤c3 d5 4.¥c1 ¦bc8 30.fxe5 ¦e8 27.¥c2 ] 11. 16.¦xa8+ ¢xf7 36.dxc5 £a5 7.¦e2+ ¢d5 52..¢f7 JvR ] 31.b4! ¢f8 [ 18.¦d2 ¦xd2 34.¦a7 ¤b8 28.¦e8 26.¥d4 ¦c7+ 70.¦xd5+ winning a pawn ¢e6 19.£d2 0-0-0 15.£xa8 0-0 15.¦d1 ) 14.£a5 d4 16.¦e6+ ¢d8 82.h3 ¤d4 27.¤e4 ¤xe4 15.¥e3 ¤f6 8.a3 ¦e4 26. The last chance gives 20. 22.¦d2 ¦xd2 25..£a4+! £d7!? [ 12.¤c3 ¥b7 13..Tigran cf Buenos Aires B44 2760 2640 1971 1.bxc3 £a5 11.¦xh7 ¦xd3 33.¥e3! ¦ab8 22.¢f3 ¦e6 55.¦xe8+ ¢xe8 27.¤h3! (Kholmov) ¦g3! 36..¦dc5 ¦cd8 33.h4 ¤e3? [ The best defence is 33.a6 ¢d6 32.¢f1 a4 24.] 14.¦c6+ ¢d8 72.¥e3 0-0 '# ' [ 15.¥d4 ¦d5+ 59.¦e6+ ¢d7 77.a5 26.¤xe6 fxe6 19.¢f2 ] 26..c4 g6 3.¦c7 ¤d7 25.£d1 ) 14.. B) 13.£xd7+.a7 ¢c7 35.Y-Taimanov.¥d4 0-0 13.¤b3 ¤e5 22..¦b7 ¤xf4 [ 33. [ Correct is 30. ] 17.¤xb4 34.¦d1 ] 15..¢e5 ¢b7 84.£c2 0-0 ( 13.¢h2 ¦a1 36..¥c4 g5 35.¥xe7 ¦xe7 18.¢c5 ¢d7 68.¤e4 £b6 18.¢f3 ''/\Kg4'' f5 29. 25.¢e3 ¢d6 34.¦a7 ¦a8 35.¥d4 ¦f1 64.¥d4 ¢xf3 50.¢e4 ¦f7 86. M/Leningrad 1960/URS-ch (96).£xa4 [ 13.¦d1 ¥f6 16.¥xf6 gxf6 11.¦ac1 ] 16.¥g5 ..¦e5 ¥d7 [ 21..¢f5 21.¤xd4 ¤c6 5.d4 ¤f6 2.¢h1 £xa3 21.¦a5 h3 37...¤c3 £c6 12..¤c3 ] 11.¦e1 ¤c2 28.¦b1 a5 23.¤f3 ¦xd5 32...£d4 ] 13.cxd5 ¤xc3 9.a4± .a4 ¥c6 /\Nd7 ] 22.£d2 £xa2 10.¤1c3 a6 10..¤xb5 ¥b7„ ] 13.¥c5! ¦fe8 [ 16..¢f1 ¦e6 47. 1-0 Petrosian.¥xb5+ ¢f8 ( 29.¦e1! [ JvR: Fischer takes the positional plus instead of the matter in 13.¦ad1? ¥b5 24.¤xc5 ¦fb8 18.¢f2 ¦e7 54.¤d7 .Robert James cf Buenos Aires D82 2640 2760 1971 1..¦xd7+ ¢xd7 33.¤xd7+ 'surprising that this exchange of the good N for the bad B is so devestating [Ruben Fine] '!'' '!?' JvR..¤xd5 ¥xd5 17..¥f4 ¥g7 5..¦c1 ''/\Rc6'' ¦d6 '?' [ 23.¥f7+ ¢d8 38.¥f6 ¢c7 67.¢g3 1-0 Gruenfeld.¦xd5?! ¤xf3+! ).¦e4 ¤xg2 39..¦xf7 ¦d1+ 35.¢f2 h5 27.¦b1 ) 20..¦f7+ ¢e8 33.¥d3 ¥xd3 18.¦b8³ ] 22.¥c4! ] 34..¥d4 ¢c7 85.¢h2 f4 Black will be able to hold the position...¥f4 e5 7.¤c3 [ 11.¥f6 ¦e2+ 46.0-0 ¢b8 20.¤f3 e6 3..¢f8 14..£xd5 11.¦xa4 ¥d6 39..¢f5 ¦d7 81.¥c4 ¤d7!? 12.¤xa4 ¥e6 15.Tigran Fischer...¥xd2 ¥xb2 35.¦h8+ ¦f8 37..¢d2 ¤b6 '?' JvR. 25.f4 h4? '?!' JvR.Robert James Petrosian.¥c5 ¦d1 62.¦g5+ ¢xh4 45.exd5 ¥xa3 13.¢d5 ¢d7 87.¥b5 ¤f6 27. [ 22.¤d4! 34.¥xc5 17.¦xe7? ¢xe7 21..¢b5 ¦d7 71.¤e4 £xd3 23.¦ee7 .. 10.¦d5+ ¢g6 32.¥e3 ¥e7 12.¤g6 36.¢f5 ¦e7 57....¢f4 ¦e1 56. [ 20.£a4+ £d7 ( 13.a5 19..¥xa6 ¤e4 22.fxe3 ¥g4 20.¥c4! B l a c k r e s i g n s [ 34.¢g3 ¦a5 40.a4 ¤c5 23.¦g5+ ¢f6 36.f4 g6 17.¥xg7 ¥xh2 41.¦d1 ¥f5? [He does not play the prepared 16..b5 ] 19.. 12..¢g2 f5 44.¥d4 0-0 18.¦da7± ] 24.¤g5! f6 35.¥f7+ ) 36..¦e2+ ( ¹20.¥b6+ ¢c8 83..¥c3+ ¢f5 40.¢d5 ¢d7 75..¥b5 ¢f8 24.d4 14.My 160 Memorable Games 47 (Horvath-Izsak.¢e5 ¦h7 78.¦a8 g6 29.¤xd2 f5 26.. The electricity fails at this moment.e4 c5 2.¦e2 JvR: 'Black has little choice.¤d7 21.¥f1 ¥d7 23.¦hg8! A chess enthusiast had sent this move to Petrosian.¤d7 16.¦xf4 ¦xa2 38.¦xd7 23.¦c6+ ¢b7 89.¤c5 ¥c8 20..¢d6 ¦b7 94.¦c8+ ¢e7 26.Y-Ginsberger.¦xf5+ ¢h3 48.¥d3 ¦a2 28.¥e5 ¦h7 90.¤b5 d6 6.¥c4? [Correct is the immediate 15.. axb5 14.¦b2 ¢d7 61.f3 ''!'' [ 20.¢c4 ¦f7 74.¦c2 ¦b4 25.¦xh7+ ¢b6 37.¥f6+ ¢e8 96.¦xa6 ¦xa6 21.¤f6 26.h4 ¢g6 42.¥g5 ¥e6 9.¦h5+ ¢g3 49.. Fischer thinks redheaded in the darkness.¥e5 ¦d7 58.¥b5 '!?' JvR.¢g8 26.¦xe1+ JvR 21.¢d5 ¦f5+ 65.¦ea7 '?!' JvR.¤b6 28.f3 ¦ee8 29.) 12.¦d6+ ¢e8 76.¦xe6 ¦xb2 20.f4 ¦c8 22.' g6 [ 25. [ 27.¦g7 ¦f6 ( 35.¦b8 JvR 34.¦e1 ¦b8 27.¦xe1 ¦b8 22.¦g4+ ¢h5 43.¤e2 .¦xh2 ¢e4 51.¦ee7 ¤d5 32.¦ed2 h4 31.¦c6+ ¢d8 95.¢e3 ''/\Kd4'' d4+ 30.¦h7 ¦f6 36.¦b7! ¦d8 31.¦d2 ¢c6 53.¦b1 ¥f3 (Timman).¥e7 12.

¢h1 Even Fischer could lose.£xc5 ( P e t r o s i a n ) .¦a2 ¥e1! 57.£d7 ¢h6 (Petrosian) appears to hold.£c2 ¦xb5 30.¤d4 £xc5 16.¥xf5 ¤xf5 26.] 41.¦xd8 25.¤e2 ¥a5 B36 Black will gain a pawn as a reward for his excellent Petrosian.£a2?! ¥b4 31.¤e1 b5 12. 43.bxa4 c4! 26.¤xc3 £e7+ 13.¦d8 h5 31.c5 £d2 21.¦d5 exf1£+ 28..¥e2 ¥e6 ] 11.£e2 ¤xb2 29.£b3 d5 22.¤f3 c5 2.] 24.¤xe4 ¥e7 6.Tigran Fischer. Dortmund 1980.¦xd1 £xe5 27.d6 A pawn avalanche a p p r o a c h e s t h e b l a c k k i n g ..¦xb5 ¤xb5 31.¥e4 ¥xf3 38.¥d3 ¥e7 7.b5 a4! 25.¤xf5 gxf5 17.£h5 £f6? Petrosian misses the threefold repetition of moves.¦ad1 [ More success will have 16.¤xf5 ¦d5 27.£xa6 ¥xa6 33.] 20.¢d3 ¢c5 41.¦a2 13..b4!? bxc4 19.¤h5 ¦f7 45.¤xd4 ¤c6 5.¥xf6 gxf6 7.£d8 £e8 34.¦xc8+ ¦xc8 18.¤f3 ¤xe4 5.] 11.£e2 ¤d7 15..¢xc1 ¢f8 20.¤xe5 d6 4.0-0 0-0 10..b3 ¦fc8 47.¤d5 £xd2+ 15.] 24.¢xd2 ¤xd5 ¦c7 51.¢xf1 £g6! 29.¥a2 ¥f5? [C o r r e c t i s 13.dxe7+ ¢g7 27.¤ef3 ¦a8 22.] ¤f6 6.¥a3 ¥d6 18. but 32.] 16.¥d2 ¥e2 37.] 25. 14.£d1 £f7 24.c6 17.£xa8! £xa8 35..dxe7 f5 31.h4 and an exchange.g3?! f5 8.¤xd5 [ 11.h3 0-0 8. 1-0 Fischer.¦e1 ¤bd7 10. Buenos Aires 1970).¥xa4 £a5 26.¦xh7 ¥c3 34.£a4+ ¢f8 22..¦b2+ ¥b4 50.cxd5 ¥d7 17.¦c2 ¦b7 48.d4 ¤f6 6.] 33.¥xb2 12.Robert James Petrosian.d4 d5 3.¥h2 ¥f8 15.¤c3 a6 13.¦xe2 ¤cd5 22.¦cd1 £e2 23.¥xc4 ¤c7 20.¦xa8 ¦xa8 33.£xg4 £c8 14.¤e1 g6 19..¦d7 34.My 160 Memorable Games 48 ¤e5!? 13.¦xf4 ¦ad8 24.¤f3 ¤f6 3.¥d3 (Korchnoi).¦xa6 The rooks are exchanged.e4 e5 2.c4 fxe3 20.¥f4 ¤c3 29..¤g3! 44..£e2 £e5 33..¤ge2 ¤c6! 10. £h5?! [ A counterattack starts 23.¥a2 [ The pointe shows 25.¦d1 ¦xa4 ] 33.¦b2 ¤e4 28.¥xh2+! (Loktev) 24.. [C o r r e c t i s 43.0-0 ¥h8! Black needs the bishop for the defence.¦a1 ¦c6! 54.¦b2 1.¦a2! but ¦c7 53.¦h4 £f6 keeps the advantage..c4 d4 5.¢xh2 £h5+ 25.gxf5 h6 29.¦b1 ¦c7 45.g3! ¤c6 7. ] ½-½ Fischer.£c2 f4 19.£xf7+ ¢xf7 32.¤b4 (Rauzer-Mazel.f3 ¢a5 0-0 10.f3 ¤xd4 8..¢xa6 44.¥h3 ¤e7 20.¦a2 ¥c3! 55.£b1 ¦a5 27..¥xd5 ¥c4 35.Tigran cf Buenos Aires C11 2760 2640 1971 1..Robert James Petrosian..¥e2 ¤ec6 8.0-0 c6 [ More active is 8.¥f4 ¦e8 11.£d3 £c8 consolidates the position.£h5 £f6 32.c4 ¤f8 12.d3 e5 6..¦xc8 ¦xc8 36..¢f1 g5 39.¦b2 ¥e1 46.dxc4 ¤bxc4 27..¦e8 9.¦xe8! ¤cxe8 21.¤c3 ¤f6 4.c4 c5 2.b3 d5 3.¥g2 ] 6.¤f3 g6 3.¦c2 cf Buenos Aires 1971 ( K o r c h n o i ) ( 43.¦b2+? Petrosian blunders right after ¢xa6! Fischer..¢c2 e6 looks horrible for White.£b3 ¢g7 29.¤c3 ¥f6 9.¥b3 [ Slihjtly better is 20.¥c6 ¤c2 36.¤c3 d6 7..¤xd5 cxd5! 24.¤xc4 ¤xc4 28.¥e2 a6 14.¥xc2 ½-½ Petrosian.c4 ¤c6 (FischerGeorghiu.¦e2 b5! 16....Tigran cf Buenos Aires C42 2760 2640 1971 1.¢g1 e2 26.¦d3 ¥e6 21.¤f5 ¦c6 45.¦c7+ ¢e6! 33.. Leningrad 1934).) 44.¢h1 ¥g7 19.¦fd1 ¥h6 22..¦ae1 g6 18.¥b2 ¤b6 21.¦a1 ¦c8 52..] 52.] 9.¦c1 ¦xc1 offers 52.] 18.£xd5 ¥xc3+ 12.d4 cxd4 4.£xb2 ¦fb8 30.g4 ¥xf5 28.¦a7?! [ More resistance 16.a3 ¤a5 23.¤e3 £f6 18.¤g1?! [ More useful is 41.. A great game was needed.£e2 £e5 31..£d2 £a5 11..g4! [Petrosian does not like 33.£c2 ¥b7 17.¦d4 ¥xf4 23.£b3 ¤e6 14.¥c3 34.a4?? ¤c3 (Korchnoi).¥xe5 ¥xe5 15.¥f7 wins for White.¥a5! 53..a6 ¦a7 38.] 14.¦c1 ¥e6 12.£d4+ f6 30..£xa4 £a6! 32.Robert James cf Buenos Aires A06 2640 2760 1971 1.¦d7 [ Or ½-½ .¤c2 ¦b8 16.Tigran 2640 restriction.h3 ¢h7 30.¥g2 0-0 13.e4 a6 11.¦a2+ ¢b5 49.e3 [Proper prophylaxis brings 6.0-0 £a5?! [ The defence 17.¦b1! ( K h o l m o v ) .¢b5 42.¤bd2 ¥e7 9.cxb5 axb5 20.¤h3! in Bellon-Segal.¦a2 ¦c8 35.¥e3 [ Avoids 33.¦a1 ¥f2 19.¦a3 ¢b4 56.¤e7 7..Robert James 2760 t h e r e s u m p t i o n ..a4?! bxa4 25.£h5 ¤g6 16.f4 e2 25..e4 W h i t e m i g h t s u r v i v e b y p a s s i v e r e s t r i c t i o n .¢e2 ¢d6 40.a3 a5 23.¥e3 43.d5 exd5! [ Petrosian improves on 10.¤ef4 ¤e5 15.¦fc1 £e8 17.¦f1 f6 28.¦xe2 21. [ 33.¥g4 ¥xg4 13.¤xa3 34.¦xf5 £d4+ 32.0-0 18.¥b2 f6! 4.£b6 26.£f7+ ¢h6 30.¦xd8 [Better is 24.a5 ¦a8 37.¥b3 £xa3 (Shamkovich).£xd4 ¥g7 9.e4 e6 2.¥g5 dxe4 5.fxe5 exd1£ 26.

e3 ¤c6 6.¢xd4 ¦d1+ 62. -1).¢d6 Bobby was .Tigran Fischer. g5 52.¥e3 ¢e4 44.£xf3 ¥e7 9..¤xg5+ hxg5 41.¢e4 ¢b5 46.Robert James cf Buenos Aires D40 2640 2760 1971 1. =2 against Fischer.a4 Petrosian played poorly..¤xb3 ¦xd1+ 20.h5 ¦h2+ 66.¥xf6 ¢xa4 42.¢e5 b4 44.0-0 0-0 12..c4 e6 3. Spassky was respected.¥c5! a6 [ The pointe is 38.b6? 39.h3 d3 32.¥xc4 ¥b6 11.d4 ¤f6 2.. Public interest for the mad genius was enormous.2 1/2 (+5.¦d7 ¥b4 57.¥b5 ¥g4? [Equality keeps 6..¥xb6 axb6 40.¦xh7 ¦a1 60.¢h5! ¢f5 43.¢e5 ¤xe2 46.cxd4 b4 21.¤ed4 ¤xd4 17...£xd6 cxd6 21.e3 0-0 6..h3 ¥xf3 8.. if his a-pawn stays on the fourth rank.My 160 Memorable Games 49 53.¥xf6 ¢c5 43.¦fe1 h6 13.¦e5 f5+ 36.¢h2 ¦b5 36..¢f1 ¢f8 22.¥xg7 ¢d4! 42.¤f3 ¤f6 5.h4 ¢c4 65.e4 a5 (Purdy).Robert James Petrosian.¤xd4+ exd4 61.¤xd6 ¥xd6 29.¢f5 ¦e2 44.¢xg3 ¢d6 36.¥f2 ¢f5 45. Therefore the final of the candidates' matches over a maximum of twelve games ended relatively quickly.¤e4 g5+ 39.a3 ¤e4 7.¤e2 dxc4 10. 1.¢xg5 ¤e6+ 43.¦f2 ¦d8 29. ¥xh2? Fischer seems to make a joke. 1-0 Spassky.fxg3 ¥xg3 35.£b1 exd5 27.¢h6 e5 47.¢f3 ¢xa4 45.¢xb6! 40.¤c3 ¤f4 34..axb4 ¥xb4 22.¤d2 dxc4 13.¤a4 ¤e4 18.¤c1 ¢a4 56.¥xg7 ¢a5 41.¥b3 b5 18.¦c6 ¤f4 26.¥f8 ( 39.¢h4 f4 The game is adjourned.g3 ¦d5 35.¥xd8 ¦bxd8 19.¦xd5 ¦e8 32.¦xe2 dxe2 39.¤c4 ¥c7 28.£f2= ) 25.g4 ¦e2 38.¢g3 f4+ 37.¤a5 ¤d6 26.¢h1 cxd4 20.b4 ¥e7 14.¢e2 ¦h1 64.¦xf6 ¦a3+ (Shamkovich).¦c1 ¦xc1 24. An audience of 2300 spectators followed game one in the Laugersdalholl stadium.¢d5 ¢b5 56. 000 and Henry Kissinger phoned Bobby.¥f2! White has achieved zugzwang.¥a3 ¢e4 [A subtle draw brings 37.¥g5 e4 48.¦d2 ¦fe8 27.¤c3 ¤c6 4.exd5 exd5 6. FIDE President Euwe had a hard time.Boris Vasily Fischer.¢g4 ¥g1 34.£d2 ¦d3 26. 0-1 Petrosian.¦xd6 ¦e1+ 28. Fischer won with 6 1/2 ..¥f8 ¢xe3! 41.£e2 ¦c8 17.¥xd5 ] 24.dxc5 £xd1 12.a3 ¥a5 9.¦xe2 ¤xd4+ 45..¥xc6+ bxc6 11.¢xe6 b3 45..¥xc4 b6 15.a5 bxa5 41.¥e3 ¢f5 50. because he had a score of +3.0-0 ¤c6 8.¤f3 d5 4.¤c3 c5 5.cxd5 cxd5 defends properly. 1986).b6! White keeps winning chances.exf4 ¢xf4 42.b6 (Byrne).£f4 £d6 20. ] 39. f5? A joke becomes a nightmare.¥e3 ¢f6 48.¢d3 ¥d8 27..¦e2 a5 15.¢xe4 ¢xa4 55. The 'match of the century' started on 11 vii 1972 with the usual time limit of 40 moves in 2 1/2 hours.¢e1 ¢d3 Petrosian was demoralised because he had played well and only scored 2 1/2 out of 6.¦c1 ¦b8? [ 22..¢g1 ¥e4 30.] 46.¦ae1 ¥d8 16.¦ab1 £a6 28.¥g5 a6 10.Tigran cf Buenos Aires C10 2760 2640 1971 1.¦xa5 ¦ee1 33.g6+ 46.¥a6 25.c4 ¤f6 22.d5 ¥c3 23.¢g2 hxg3 34.] 53..¦a2 ¦b1 37.¥d3 c5 7.b5 Spassky is happy with a quiet draw.£c2 ¤xc3 8.¢f4 b5 43. ] 40.¥b2 0-0 10.cxd5 cxd5 24.¦b3 £c4 33.¥h4 £d7 14.c4 e6 3.£d2 d4 27..¥d8! ¢b4 44.¢h4 g6 31.¥a2! ¦e3 ( 24.¤e2 ¢b3 58.¢h4 ¢h7 38.¤xc4 ¤xc4 14.h3 33..¦be8 ] 29.¢xg5 ¢c4 53..¥g5 and White wins (Byrne).¢g4 ¤g7 40.d4 ¤f6 2.¥d2 ¢f6 49.¢e2 ¤e4 23.¦ac1 ¦fd8 16.¢g4 ¢e5 49..¥h4 e5 [Or 45.£xe2 £xf4+ 0-1 Fischer.0-0 ¤a5 12.¤f3 d5 4.Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik E56 2660 2785 1972 Fischer challenged world champion Boris Spassky..¤c3 ¥b4 5.d4 d5 3.. =3.] 7.¥d2! (Byrne).¥b4 7. At the end of the match.¢f5 ¢b4 54.e4 e6 2.a5 ¢d5 ) 39.£xb6 axb6 28.e5 40. It had become a confrontation between capitalism and communism.a4 ¢d5 37.¦xd1 ¥xc5 13.¦b2 ¦dd4 Tigran is humiliated.f4 £b6 19.¦xe8+ ¦xe8 24.¢e3 ¥c5+ 63.¢d5! a5! (Prins).exd5 25.e5 ¦e3 26.b3 ¦b8 17. ] 38.¦xd1 ¦c8 21.¢g3 ¤h5+ 30. 34.¥b3 ¥xb3 19.¢d5 ¢b4! 46.¢f5 a5 51. Many problems occurred until the match began in Reykjavik.¦fe8 23. 30.¥b2 ¥d7 15.0-0 0-0 (Fleck-Thesing.¥xe4 ¦xe4 31..¢e2 h4 32.¢f3 ¢e7 [No good is 32.¢f2 ¦h1? [Better is 28.] 23.¦xe1 ¦xe1 42.¥d3 h6 11. [ A draw gives 39.¥xc3 ¦xc3 24.¢g5 ¢d5 50.g3 h5 31.a6! 38.£c2! ¦c8 26. Fischer finally flew to Iceland.¥b6 54.¢xh3 ¥xf2 35.¥c2? [Correct is 24. Fischer complaints about the noise of the film camera at the resumption.¥xc1 f6 25.e4 ¥b7 16.¢g4 ¤e6 35. ] 33. 41.¦d5+ ¥c5 55.b6! ¢c6 39.¦f7 ¦a8 55.bxc3 ¥e7 9. Fischer had crushed 'the other guy's ego'.¥g5 e4 47. Petrosian had been treated like Taimanov and Larsen.¦b7 ¦a8 59. When Jim Slater doubled the prize money of $125.¤xd4 ¥a4 18.¦xh7 ¥b6! 54.f3 ¤h5 25.

f3 g5 ( 11.¦xe4 ¦xe4 34.£xh4 g5! 27.¦h4 offers superb chances.c4 e6 3.£d3 a5! A novelty has been prepared in EXT 99 (42)) 15...¥f1 ¥f4 28.¦xd1 h5! Spassky played for a win.¤f5 A1) 12.¥xf7 ¦e7 23.¤f3 d6 3..¤d4 ¦h8! 30.¤h4 [ 10..¥e2 0-0 10..¤f5 ¥xf5 12.¢g3 £g6+ 33.b5 21. 28.g4!? ( 32.f4 gxh4 18.fxe6 ¤xc3 29.f3 ¤g7 20.¢f2 ( 15.£f3 £c2+ 32.¥d3 ¥xc3+ 7.¥c4 e6 7.f3 ¥g6 16.f3! (Byrne).J-Damjanovic..e5 dxe5 21.¥e3 0-0 ¤b4 40. ] 15.¤xf7! ¦xd1+ 29.b4 c4 27.axb5 axb5 26.¤b5 £e7 16.a3 ¥b7 1-0 Donner.d4 cxd4 4..¤f3 c5 5.¥e2 ¥e5 37.£c2 ¤h5!? The preparation by the Soviet grandmasters has not foreseen this provocative opening at all.cxd4 exd4 12.¥c1 £b1 37.¥f7 ¥g3 45. It is removed.¤b5 ¢g7! 29.£xf5 £xc3+ 21.a4÷ ] 10.hxg5 £xc4 24.c4 ¢d6 44.¥c2 ¥xf5 15..Da4 ) 21.¥h5 ¦c7 39.¥f4+ ¢b6 41.h5 b5 Fischer's favourite opening.¦dh1 ¦xh6 28.¦f1 ¦f4 33.¢e2 £e4+ 39.£d2 £b3 41. 29.gxf3 ¤exd5 ¤d7 16.d5 [ 9. 32.£d5 e4+ 38.¥d2 [The initiative keeps 15.fxe5 18.£d2 ¦be8 28.¥e2 ¦g8 18.¤c3 g6 7..¤f3 c5 4.£c2 g5 13.exf5! ] 11.¤g6 11.h7 c4 30.¥b3 ¥e7 8.¥xc5+ 18..¦e3 ¢g8 31.cxd5 d6 6.Boris Vasily Fischer.Boris Vasily Fischer.d4 ¤f6 2.¢f2 £b2+ 22. He is not 'demoralised' as commentators describe him.¤f3 ¥xf3 31..¥e3 ¢b8 20.¥g3 h5 19.Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik E41 2660 2785 1972 1.¦b1 bxc4 19.£a5 12.b3 ¦e7 24..M/Cienfuegos 1972/ 13.d5 exd5 5.£c3! £xc3 33.£xb3 a4 19.£d3 ¥a6 20.e3 ¤c6 6.Boris Vasily Wch28 Reykjavik A00 2785 2660 1972 0-1 Spassky.£c2 h5 12...e5! dxe5 15.£g2 £e3 34.£e2 ¦xf1+ 34.bxc3 ¥e5 34..£xf3 ¥d6? [ 31..£xc3 ¦xe4 33.¤e4 ¤f6 18. because he has defeated Boris for the first time.h3 b6 11.¢f1 ¦c8 38. ] 17.¤d2 0-0 ( 10.My 160 Memorable Games 50 very upset about the defeat.¤f5 ¤xf5 14.¦e2 b5! 22. He starts to shout when he notices the film camera.¦ad1 ¦xd1 21.£d7+= ] 28.¥e3 ¥a6 12.¥xg4 ¦xg4 19.¦e3 h5!? Black postpones the capture on c3.¢h1 £g5 19. but Fischer prevents it.bxc3 d6 8.g3 0-0-0 ) 11.¤xg4 hxg4 17.¦d8 28.exf5 ¤xf5 15.¥c4 h4! 24.] 26. IBM 1981 14.¢e3 ¦xg2 ) A) 12. 0-1 1986... ] 18.h3 ¥e3! 25.exf5 £a5 A1a) 14.¢f2 ¤xe4+ B88 18.¥xh5 gxh5 13..gxh6 ¢c7 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 29.¤c4 ¤e5 14.0-0 ¦e8 11.£xd1 ¢xf7 30.¤d6 ¥a8 23.£e3 £c2+ 40.e4 c5 2.¤e7 [ 9.a4 ¢e7 41.¦xh6 £g4 25. 8.¥d6! 33.¥xc4 ¥xb5 J 13..¤xb5 ¤c5 17..exf5 ¥d7 15.¦fe1 a6 21.£c2 0-0-0 15..¦xe4 £xe4 35.Pd2!? cxd4 11.¥xd4 b5 12.0-0!?.Robert James Spassky.c5+ ½-½ Spassky.h4 g4 16. £g6 23.h4 ¥d7 13.¦d7 ¢f6 35.¤a5 10.¢f2 £c2+ 35.h8£ ¦xh8 9.£g4 £d3 34.¥d2 ¤e8 13.¦3e2 ¥xc3 32.h4 ¤d7 17..d6 ¤c6 Fischer. [Solid is 18.¢f2 5.c4 e6 3.f6 ¥g6³ .¢g3 £xc3 39.¦xa7+ ¢c6 30.¤e3 £h4 15.¤g3 f5 Portisch-Miles.¦de8 16.¤c4 and White holds the position.£e2 £xf5+ 31.¥h6 £g6 36.0-0 a6 10.d4 ¤f6 2.e4 ¥g7 9.¥d7 19.¥e6+ ¢c7 24.¤g4 16.¢e2 f5 42.£xg4 26.cxb5 c4 22.f4 '!?' [ 11.¥f4 £f6 18.¦a1 ¦xe6 21.¥xh6 ¥xf5 20..£e3! 21.g4 £a4 ( 20.¢d3 ¥e5 43.£d3 ¦b8 25.a4 a6 17.£xf1 £xb2 is horrible. 12.£e2 8.£e2 ¦ad8 20...£d4?! ¥d3+! Bobby is jubilant...) 32.¦f7 ¤fd5 31. corr..a4 b6 20.¥xc5? [The quiet 17.£xa4 ¤xa4 27.f4 ¤xd4 11.¤f1 £a5 12.¤xd4 ¤f6 36..0-0 g5 12.¦ad1 £a6 23.¢g1 ¥xc3 36.¥xf5 13.¦3e2 ¢h7 30.¤c3 ¥b4 4.g3? White weakens his kingside.e4 e5 9.¤g5 ¦ae8 19.£xc4 b5 37.£a5 11.£d3 b6 27.0-0 ¥d7 17.hxg4 h3 27.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¤f5 ¤xf5 13.¦ae1 Spassky wants to counter in the centre.£d6+ ¢b7 42.e7 .£b3 ¤b6 22.£b3 ¦b8= ] 10.Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik A77 2660 2785 1972 The game is played in a private room at the request of Fischer. 11.¦ad1 £d7 £a6 25. 1.c4 ¦ab8 will draw in Carlson-Thompson.h3 h6 10.¢f1 ¥f5 38.h4 g4 17..¥xe4 ¦de8 17.£c2 g6 16. 1-0 Fischer.¦xc7 ¥xc7 40.£g4 ¥c5! [ 27. Schmid restores the peace between the players.¥e3 ¤xb3 18.Boris Vasily 2660 ¦d8 26..f5 ¥h7 19.¥xc4 gxf3 20.¤c3 (Smith).. 14. 22.¤d2 ¤bd7 8.exf5 e4 14.¦d3 £c1+ 35.¢f3 f5 1.Robert James 2785 22.h4 e4 16.£g4 £xe5! [ 25.£g1 £xb2 ] 32.d7 Spassky.a4 £xa4 26.£e2 £d7!? 13.h6 [ 10.¥b2 ] 9.fxg4 ¤xg4 17.fxe4 f6 19.

¥e3 ¦xg2 34.¥h4 b6 [ 7.¥xd5 ¤d4 38.¢f2 £f6 17.¦b1 0-0 8...¦c1 b6 9.¥xe5 fxe5 47.Boris Vasily Wch28 Reykjavik D59 2785 2660 1972 Queen's Gambit Declined.e5 2.¥xe4 ¤xe4+ 18.¦xf8+ ¢xf8 26.d6+ ¢d7 32.¦xf8+ ¦xf8 25.¥c4 ¦xd7 35.¦g5 ¤f6 35.£b3 0-0-0 15.¤e1 ¤e5 19.axb5 £c8 36.dxe5 17.exf5 ¤xf4 G 13.h4 f6 20.£xd1 £xe4 30.£e1 ¤e6 37.¦dc1 ¥xb3 18.¥xh6 ¦f1 29.0-0 ¥e7 11.¢f3 g4+ 21.¤c3 d6 3.¥d1 ¤f4 27.¢xe4 ¦e8+ 27.dxc5 bxc5 17.¦xb5 ¤h5+ 25.¤f5 ¥xf5 13..¥g3 £xc4-+ ) 28.G/ Budapest 1964/MCD (39)] 9..0-0 ( 15.¦h3 ¦df8 21.¥c2 ¦g2+ 41.¤ec3 ¤e7 33..£xe3 gxf3+ 38..¤e5 cxd4 25. B) 12..¦fd1 g6 16.¦c1 ¥e6 [ 11.f5 g5µ ] 13...¦b1 ¥d7 18.D/Budva 1967/EXT 99 (19) ) 16.f5 gxf5 ( 14...£d2 ¢e7 31.¥d2 ¢d7 33.¦e2 ¢d7 31.0-0 0-0 16.£c2 ¥d7 16.dxc5 bxc5 17.¥e3 £e7 19.¤xd5 exd5 12.0-0 Korchnoi-Geller/Suchumi/ 1971/ ] 8.¢f4 ¦de8 22.£d3 ¤h5 24.L/Palma de Mallorca 1970/IZT (38). .L/Borsodtavho 1991/CBM 23 ext (20)] 12.¦7b3 g4 27..0-0 ¤bd7 11.¥d3 ¤g8 30.¥xf7+ ¢g5 38. [ 11.¤d1 ¥h6 30.¥xh4 ¤g6 17.¤f3 ¥g7 6.¦g4 ¦f2 33..¦xd7 ¢g6 36.¢d3 ¦xe1 28. e6 [ This is Fischer' s previous and first game in his career that he played the English.¥b5 ¤df6 24.¤c6 £c7 1/2-1/2 Szabo.£e7 £a5 39.¥e2 ¥b7 9.d3 e6 10.¤f3 ¥f5 5.¥f4 ¤e5+ 46.My 160 Memorable Games 51 ¦a8 32.exf5 £b6+ 18.¦xd8 ¥xd8 1/2-1/2 Fischer.¤xd5? 10.¦xc7 ) 10.£b5 £xb5 24.¦e4 g3 32.¦b1 ¥b7 11..¥b5!± Capablanca] 8..cxd5 [ 8...¥d3 ¥b7 10.¦xf7 ¤xe3+ 34.¥e5 ( 16.Robert James Spassky.0-0 ¢f8 ( 15.¤a4 ¦fc8 15.¦b2 ¦b8 19.£d1 ¤xf5 33.¥d3 c5 23...¥g2 g6 5.¥g2 ¥e6 21.gxf5 g4 37.¢g3 £h4+ 31.h7+ ¢h8 51.¦xc8 ¥xc8 28. .a4 ¤f6 13..¢h1 £xb5 (!) ) 15.¢d1 £xf5 42.£b2 ¥e8 26.¦d7 ¦bd8 34.¤g6! Fischer plays a surprising move.fxg3 h5 29.cxd5 exd5 11.¦b3 ¥e6 23.¥xf4 g5 13. B) 14.Kholmov 1-0 Moscow zt 1964 ] 2.¥b5 c6 22.¢g3 ¥xf7 35.axb3 cxd5 8.¥e3 b6 15.¦f5 ¤d7 43.e4 dxe4 14. 1.¦c7 ¥d8 25.f3 ¤g5 31.£xe4 29.¤f6 2.cxb5 c4 16.£a7 16.¦fd1 ¤d7 18.e5 ¥d3 16.exd4 ¦xc2 26.JMenacher.g3 ¤g7 15.¦xc2 ¦c8 27.S-Ciric..¦b7 ¥c8 26..£e2 ¢h8 24.d5 cxd5 36.£g6 £e8 42.¥xf5 gxf5 39..¤f5 ] 11.¦h7 £d8 24.¤bd7 8.¢g2 ¦b8 33..¢g3 ¤xc3 39..¢c1 £f1+ 43.¥xf3 ¤xe5 22.cxd5 £xb3 7.¦fc1 .£d2 fxg3 28.£a4 c5 13.¥f4 0-0 13.£d3 ) 15.exf5 ¤h5 14.£a3 ¦f7 29.¤c3 ¥e7 5..¦d2 ¤f6 30.¦f7 Spassky.¦1h6 £d8 28.£xd6 ¤df5 41.¥b7 ] 12.¥g5 0-0 6.¤f3 d5 3.¤fg8 14.¦c2 ¤ef6 19.¢e4 ¢f7 49.P-Somlai.d4 exd4 34.¥g2 ¥d5 23.¢f2 ¤d3+ 30. A1b) 14.U/ Palma de Mallorca 1971/EXT 98 (53).¦xd6 ¦xc4+ 53.¢b2 £d3 44.¦e1 ¦f7 19.£xa4 '?' ( 28.¥e3 ¤g4 12.¤xg6 [ 12.¥g2 d5 4.h5 ¦g3+ 48.¦c1 ¤e4 12.¤de4 g5 18.£d3 e5 # 20.¢f2 e4 17.¤xd5 [ 8.£e2 a6 14.¥xe7 £xe7 11.¢d3 ¦a1 42.¥e2= a5 15.£h5+ ¢d7 19.e3 c6 14..exd5 9.¢xe5 1/2-1/2 Donner.¤g6 ¤xg6 17. ..e6 ¤f6 15. 11.¤e4 ¤xg4 28. A2) 12.¦ah1 ¦hg8 22. The Soviet opening preparation is avoided.£c2 £e7 32.¦xf6 gxh4 18.a4 ¥xb5 35.£c2 ¥b7 29.g4 0-0-0 18.J-Garcia Martinez.¤d2 ¤d7 12.g3 c6 3.h6 ¢g8 50.¢xf3 e4+ 39.¥xh6 ¢xe7 36.exd4 ¤ef5 35.¥b3 £d8 31..¤f3 ¤d7 1/2-1/2 Gligoric..¦xf6 1-0 Michenka. .¥xe7 £xe7 13.g3 ¤c6 4.¢e3 ¦xe4+ 26.¦xe6 ¦g8 20.¤e1 ¢g7 17.¥xf6 ¥xf6 10.¥g3 ¦g8 19.dxe5 14.K/ W i j k 1 9 7 1 / M e g a B a s e 9 7 ( 4 4 ).bxc6 bxc6 15.¢e2 £e5 40.¤b5 £d8 33..¦xb7 ¥b6 26.¢d3 ¦f2 39.¥b4 £xa4 40.¦b7 ¥c8 22..¦bf2 £e7 20..¥xd5 ¦ad8 27.¦fd1 ¥c2 17.¥g3 gxh4 16.fxe6 16.¥xe7 £xe7 10.¥xc3 e3+ 38.¦dc1 £d6 21.e5! ¤g4 ( 13.¥e1 £g6 23..¥d2 £e8 22. .¥f3 ¦f8 20.¦f8 ¦e8 34.¦xe8 ¢xe8 35..¥c2 gxf5 17.a3 a5 18.g6 ] 12.h4 ¤f6 20.¦b2 ¦xf5 30.¤xf6 ¢xf6 31..¦d3 ¢g7 32.J-Andersson.c4 .£d3 f5 36.¥c3 h4 44.¤c3 ¤e7 32.¥a3 ¤e8 16. Tartakower Defense Inf14 1.R-Polugaevsky.¢g2 ¢b8 25.hxg4 gxf4 20.exf4 12.¤f3 ¤e4 20.cxd5 exd5 Tartakover ( 9.¦f2 f6 44.exd5 creating hanging pawns in the centre for black.£xe5 1-0 Lukacs.¢e2 ¤c1# ] 0-1 Fischer.¥xg6+ ¢e7 18.S/ Palma de Mallorca 1971/EXT 98 (39).¦e1 ¦hg8 23.£c1 £xc4 0-1 Donner.hxg5 hxg5 23.¥xg3 ¦xa4 41.h3 g5 19.¢f3 £f4+ 32.£c2?? ''T' '??' '# '' [ 27.¤xd5 ¥xd5 ] 10.dxe4 ¥g6 15.0-0 0-0 A) 14.£c1 £a5 30.d4 ¤f6 4.£g3 £e8 16.£e1 ¥d7 15.£a3 ¦c8 14.e3 h6 7.¦c2 ¤d7 18.£b1 ¥xd1 29.£e1 ¥e6 31.¦d1 ¢g7 29.d3 h6 9.. .fxe5?! ''?!'' [ A plus keeps 13.0-0 ¤ge7 7.£b3 £b6 6.exd6? ) 14.L-Forintos.fxe4 ¤g8 19.¥c2 g5 21.exf5 ¥d7 .£b1 ] 27.¤xf5 13.¥b5!± [ 14.b4 f5 10..¢e3 ¦c2 38.¥g7 e4 37.¥xg6 fxg6 18..¦eb1 ¤f5 25..¥xa4 28.¥f4 ¦f2 37.¤xd5 exd5 24.¦b7 ¤eg7 32..¦b1 £a6 16.g4 ¦d8 37.¤c3 ¤c6 9.¦b3 f4 17. 1.¤d2 f3 21.M/Pardubice 1993/TD (20)) 16.fxg6 13.b5 15.£f2 ¥a6 34.J-Langeweg.£xe8 ¦fxe8 43..b5 ¤b8 11.¦h6 ¦xc3 52.h6 1-0 Donner..¥xa4! '-+!' [ 27.¦h2 ¦g1 45.a4 '=' a5 '!' ''!' '# '' 17.a4 ¢e7 36.¢e3 ¦a2 40.¤xd5 [ 10.£e3 ¤f5 38.¥c2 £a5 27.¤xd5 ¥xd5 37.

...¤d3± .¢f8± Purdy .£b4+ ¢f6 19.c4± Purdy 20.¥b5 ¤f6 ] 19.¤f3 d6 3.f4! ( 19.¤d4 ) 20.a4!! ¤xa4 27... and 20.¤e5 /\ 19...¤e8+ ¢g6 41.¦c6 37.¦xc4! ¦xc4 28.D/Beverwijk 1967/ MCD (36) ] 14.£xe1 ¤xe1 34..£b7 (Timman-Geller.£d2 £xb2 9.. ] 16..¥g4 Purdy . a 6 .e4! ) 21...f6 ( 23..¢xe1+.¤d4 ¦c7 19.£xd4 ( 26. 19..Timman ] 22.h5 g5 33.£xe7+ ¢xe7 18..Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik B97 2660 2785 1972 1.b3 cxb3! 24. B) 19.¤c5 23.¦xc5 £xc5! 17..¦e6 ¦c2+ 43.¤xb5 £a6! 18..e4 c5 2.£h3 £f7 A) 22.£e4! ¤f6 [ 37.e4!! [ 20...f3! c4 21.¤f6 34. '/\ 15.¤d4± ) 23.¦a7 19.¤f6 19.¤b3 A) 19..g4 ¢g7 34.¥xa2 ¦b7= 26.¥g4 ¦e8 23.¤c4 ¤d5 30.] 12.¤a5 b6 29..£a7 Larsen 17. [Counteraction gives 24.£xe7 ¦xe7 22.e5! dxe5 14..gxf4 g4?! [ 34.£c6 26.¦fd1± Andersson .£xb4+ ¤xb4 27.£xe6 £xe6 26.. 41.£xc4 ¦xb2 26.¤b6 24.¤xd6+ ¢f8 [ Black can try 16.0-0 h6! 12.£g3 ¦ae7 27.f6!+.e5 Nb6 22.¦a8 35.¤xe4 ¥xh4 14. c4 Pachmann' 15.fxg5 ¦xa4 36...f5! ) A) 23.¥g4+.] 18.£xf5 (Tal & Timman).f4 £e7 [ ¹21..¦5f3+.¦ab7 Purdy ( 26..¤d4! /\ 19..£xh4+ ¢g6 ] 17. 33.Nd7 Zelinskis ) 17..¢xf1 ¦e1+ 33..£g3+ ¢h8 43.¤xd6 ¦c1+ 39.¦1f2 £e8 35.¥f3 £c7 23.¦f1 £xf1+ 32.¢d2 ¢e7 19..c4 ¤e3 33..£f4 g5! 17.Ne6 £f8? Timman [ ¹18.b4! £b5 ( ¹25.Timman ] 33...¢f1 axb3 29.dxc5 bxc5 16.¦c1 ¢d6 /\ 20..Boris Vasily Fischer..¤e4 A1) 20.¥b5± F u r m a n .£c6 ¦b8 21.¥f3 c4 21..¥b5+! Spassky attacks the king.¦ae1 £b4 26.h4 g6 32.0-0 ¤d7 ( 19.£xh6 ( 42..¤e5 ¤xe5 21..b3 a5 26.exd5 exd5 24.¤d4± .¦xa2? 27.¥xg6 £xf4 30.h4 f6 42..a5 18.¦a1 ¤b4µ ) 22. ¹18.¦xf6! gxf6 39.¦c7 19.¦ee4 ¦c1+ .£f4 g6 21.£xe5 ¦c8 22.c4 18.¦2f3 £d8 36..¦c3 ( 18.¤e5 ¥e8 21..¥d3 ¥e7 11..¦c1 ¥f5 Timman .My 160 Memorable Games 52 ¦cb8 19.¤b3 £a3 10.¢h7!? ) 28.¤xf5! gxf5 21.¥f3± Timman ] 21.¢h1 f4 24.¢d3 f6 23.G e l l e r / U S S R c h / 1 9 7 0 /] 18.a4! £d8 [ 33.£b3! ¤d5 24.Tal .¤e5! ( 18. Moscow 1973).¦cf1 [ 28.¤xb5 £e7!? [ Or 19.¦xe7 ¦xe7 29.¤d3 ¤a6 ) 19.a4 ¥g5 22.exd5 exd5 22.¦fe1 £f6 25.¤xc5 bxc5 keeps the attack going.¦xc5 ¦xc5 17.f4 ¤d3 ( 27.£d8++.f5! exf5 15.¢g8? 34.¤e5 f6! 19...e6 ¤e5 25.dxc5 A) 15.¥c4 /\ 23.¢g2 ¤c4 40.f3 g5 1/2/Zelinskis-Sichov/corr/1971.) 23.¤cd6 ¥c5 31.¦xe6 38..¦fe1 ¤e5 ( 24..cxb3! ( 22.¦f8+ ¤xf8 39.¢e2 ¦b1 31.£a5 £c5 25.d4? [ Better moves are 20.¥c4 ¥xc4 19. B) 23.¦fc1 ¦e8 20.¥h5 g6 26.¥xd7 ¥xd7 20.¤xf7 ¢xf7 22.£xc5 a6 18.¤d4 £b6 22.¤d7 19...a6 [P l a y a b l e i s 14.¦f3 ¤xc4 34.¦xf8+ £xf8 40..Timman .£xe7 ¦xe7 19..£c3 ¦b4 20.¥f7+! ¢xf7 31.exf5? 24.¥xc6 ¦xc6 18. 17.¦xe1+ 25.¥d3 £xb2 19..f4 £b6 8...¤d4 ( 22.Nb3.fxe6 ¤a6 22.¢g1 ¢f5 44.fxe4 cxb3= ) 22.¢d2 ( 17...£d7 g6 19.-> Timman ..dxe4 23.¥e2 ¤d7 ) 17.S-Ciric..£c4 ¥e3+ 23...¥g4+.Nd3 A) 18..¢f8 / \ c 4 ..¦xf5 ¤h7 28.¦f4 ) 26.bxc5 16.£b3++Purdy ] 23.¤d6 ¥e7 20.¥c4! Fischer has changed his strategy from attack on the queenside to restraint of the centre. B) 22...¤xe6! fxe6 20.¥xf6 ¥xf6 13.¦c2 a4 19.0-0 ¦a7?! [Donner advices 16.¦d4+ ¢g3 46. C) 19.. axb5 [Wild is 15.¤d6 [ Complicatives are presented by 18.b3 c4 17.f5!+exf5 27.b3 a4 28..¦f7?? ¤g5 ] 28.....¢h8 /\ 22.¢e7! 16.f4! ( 19.. ] 35.£xa2? 20..£xc5+ bxc5 18.. Hilversum 1973).¤b3 d4!„ ) 18.¦d3 h5 36. 16.¢d3 ¦d1+ 1/2-1/2 Gligoric.¤c3 a6 6.exd5 exd5 24.¦xf6! .d3 33.£e5 £e8 [ 32.¦xf6 ¢g8 40.£xa3 18.f5 ¦d7 28.¥a4 a5 18.¦xd2 20...¦xc5?! 16.¥xd5 ¥xd5 26.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦c1² Timman .g3 g5 25.¥a4± Timman ] 15.e5 +/..¤g7+ ¢xf4 45.c4 21.¤d3 ¦ac7 ).¤7d6 ¥xd6 38..¤d4 ¤c5 23.¥g5 e6 7...¥d3! £e8 [ 36. B) 18.¦c1 ¢e7 22.g6? 23..¤f6 Purdy 21.£d8 29.¦e2 ¢g7 28.Rf7 Timman ¢h8 41.axb3 ¤d3 25......¦f7! .¥c4 /\ 41..¢d4 ¥d7 25..¦f7 ] 34.¢e7 17.fxe5 21.¥e2 ( 17..£g3! ¤xc4? 26.£e3! ¥e6! 18. 14.¤d7÷ Timman 20.£g3 ¦e7 30.a5 19.¤b6? 23.¤d4 a6 19..e5 23.c4 24.¦d4 ¦b1 36.¤xc4 25...£xe7 ¦xe7 21.¥xd5 bxa2 25..¤xc8 ¤c6 18..¤xa3 ¦d5 ] 20.¦f7+.0-0! ] 16.axb3 ¦xb3 30..£xc5 ( 24...d4 cxd4 4.dxc5 bxc5 [ 15.f6 20.£xc7 ¦xc7 24.)] 24.b3 ¤a5 22.h3 ¤a5 37.¤f5+ ¢f3 47.£xe7 ¦xe7 22.¤f3 ¢d6 24.¦xe1 ¢f8 ) 25.¤b7 ¦c8 32.¥a4! ( 17.£e5! )] 1-0 Spassky.¤c6! 'Donner' 17..¥h5 £e7 ( 22... b 5 15..bxc4 ¤xc4 23.h4 ¦bb7 31.¤e4 ¤d7 (Tal-Zaid.f5 £g5 ) 26.¥e2 The bishop returns to protect the kingside.¦d1 c4 25.¦xf6! gxf6 35..¤d3 ¤a6= )] 17..£h3 ¤f8? Spassky accepts his p a s s i v i t y ... B) 15..£b3!+Tal ) 24.....¦xd5 c3 27.¦d8 19.¦xc8+ ¥xc8 24.¤xe4 13.£b6 18. A2) 20.¥xe6 ¦c7 ] 25.¦xc5! 16.£b7 Geller 17.e4± ¦ec7 24.f5 ¥f7 ( 20.£f4 ¢g8 42... ¢h8 [ ¹23.¤d4 ¤c6 Tal 20.e6! ¦bc7 32.¦xb2 (Tal) 25.¦d1 ¦b6 35.¥g4 ] 20...¦xf5 ¥e6 20. Black has a weak c5 pawn and an undeveloped queenside..£f4 An attack on the kingside decided the game.¥xe4 ( 22.£h7# ] 38. [ 41.fxe5 £e7 24.f5 /\ 24.¤d2 ¦e8 26.¦af1! (Timman).bxa3 ¤d7 19. 16.¥b5! ) 18...e5! ¦b8 [ 22.b3 _|_ +/-/+/= Timman .¤xe6 fxe6 21. ¤d7 [ 17.£e4 ] 37.¥h4?! [ Theory will become 12.

.£b6 17. Spassky has defended very ¥a3 32.¢e2 ¦d5 42.a5 ¤bd7 16.¥e3 b5? 31.d4 cxd4 4.¥g5 ¥e6 11.¦xd6 ¥xe4 36.¦ac1 29..¥xf6 [ 10.¥e2 was played in game seven..S z n a p i k .¤d5! £xf7 32.¦4b7 ¦d6 52..] 30. ] 16.¦b6 (Timman) Timman).¢g2 a5 26. Hannover 1983). Polonica-Zdroj 1972.hxg4 g5 Spassky.Robert James 2785 18.. corr.¦d5+ ¢e6 36.exf5+ ¢e5 34.cxb5 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 ¦ed8 24.£d2 £xb2 ½-½ 9.Boris Vasily 2660 45.¦b5 ¢f6 47.¢h1 ¥d7 14.g3 g6 5.3 1/2 (+5.¦ad8!? 30.¦fe1 ¥e7 31.£xd3 ¦xd3 24.£xe5 21.¤xf7 ¦xd1 33.¥d7 (Smyslov & 34.f4 £b6 8. Now ¥xg7! 26.g3 f6 28.¦cd4 ¢xf5 well in this great game.¥b3 d6 8. occurred in game 1.f4! g6 43.£d2 ¤xd4 19.h3 ¤b8 threatens .¥b2 £b8!? 25.¦b1 1.¥xf6 [Fine is 22.Robert James 2785 15.bxc4 ¥xc4 19.¤b3 g6 draws in Vasiukov1.¦ec2 ¥b2 30.f3 bxc4 17. £b4 Fischer.¦b8 ¦d7 51.¦xb4 £d7 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 21.¤xd4 ¤f6 ¦d2 28.£c1 £c3 [ 24.a3 £a4 18.¥xb8 ¦xb8 18.c5 18..¦b6 ¦d7 53. 9 and 10.¤b1! C95 A great new move is found at the board. Petropolis 1973)..gxf6 11.¤1d2 f5 10.a4 0-0 14. The level was superb Moscow 1969.¦b7 ¦a1+ 36.¦bd1! ¦e7 [ 29.¤e5 £c7 9. P o l a n d 1 9 7 2 ) .¥d2 £a5 12.Boris Vasily 2660 15.¦xe6 .¢e2 c4 39. continued with 8..¥b5 a6 4.axb5 25.g4! hxg4 43. 10.¢xf7 ¦b1+ 24..dxe5 ¤xe5 20.¢xg2 ¦h3 27.¦b6 £c3 27.f6 ¢d4 56.] 16.My 160 Memorable Games 53 48.¤c3 £c6 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 19.¥c2 ¦e8 13.exd5 19..a3! £b6 22.¥b3!! axb5 27.¥e2 h5 12.£c3 ¥b7 15.¥d3 [A plus gains 10.¢f1 (Byrne) ¦h2! ] 1-0 39.£c3 fxg4 24.f4 34.¢f3! ¢f7?! [A good try is 40.¤h6+!? gxh6 £xd2 21.£xf3 ( K o s t r o .¤d4 £c5 (Qi Jingxuan-Karpov.] 25.¢e2 ¦d5 42.¦d7! leads to zugzwang.] 10. =3.f5+ gxf5 33.¤bd2 ¥b7 12. 20.¦xe4 [ 33.¢g1 ½-½ (Koskinen-Rabosee.£xd4 d6 10.¥xf7+! ¦xf7 31.¦xb2 Spassky. 7.c5 £b5 23.e4 ¤xc3 7..¦b1 [Problems are set by 17.£f4 £a5 12.¦xd6+ ¢e7 37.¦e1 b5 7.c4 ¤xf3+ 21.¦b8+ ¦xb8 26..¤e7 16.c3 0-0 9.c4 f5 17.exf6! ¦xe1+ 24.£xa1 £b6 Spassky.¦xb7 g5 25.¥a4 ¤f6 5.] 33..] 10.f4 ¥d4 40.dxe6 fxe6 30. Best is the simple 15. but 45...¤xe7+ ¢f8 22.¥b4+ 11..b4 21..0-0 0-0 7..g4 ¦a2+ 41.£xd2 a6 13.¥e2! 1-0 ¥b4+ 11.£xf7+ £xf7 32..£d3! h4? 1.bxc5 dxc5 19.. He treated ¤xd5 6.Robert James 2785 ¢e5 49.£e7 ¥xb2 27.¥a7! ¥c2 37.¤c3 ¤c6 3.¤xf7 ¥xe4 33.¤f3 d6 3. ¦d8 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 50.¦b6+ Fischer.¦d7+ ¢f6 35.axb5 hxg2+ 26.e4 ¥a1 27.£xe1 £xd2 25.d4 ¤bd7 11..f3 1.¢g2 So far.hxg5 hxg5 5.£xf6 23.¥g5 e6 7.h4 h6 29. A striking novelty.¦b7+ ¢f8 (Timman).¦exb4! ¥d4 48.Robert James 2785 (Timman).¢h2 £f4+ draws.c4 £f4 22.¦c6 39..Boris Vasily 2660 (Purdy) favours Black.¦xb8+ ¢g7 27.0-0 [ After 18..d5! Polugaevsky-Mecking..¦d2 b4 38.b6! ] 16.¦xe4 c4 will probably draw...¤f3 d5 4...¤f3 ¤f6 4.cxd5 Fischer led by 6 1/2 .£f4 ¦d7 28.¥f1 ¤c5 25.¦xg5 ¥e5 55.c4 c5 2.¢f3! White threatens mate in one.g4 hxg4 44. -2).¦fb1 £xd3 23.¦e2 ¢e6 29. 1972).¥g4! ¤d6 20.c4! ¤f5 18..¥b4+ ] 9.bxc3 cxd4 8..e4 c5 2.£e3 ¦fd8 22.hxg4 ¢f7 44.] 20.¥a4 ¥c8 29.¢h2 ¦c2+ 49.cxd5 h4! Black really ¥e7 6. h5? [Right is 38.] 17..b3 ¦fc8 14.¦fd1 ¥d3 narrowly escapes.¥c4 b5! in 3.a4 ¤b6 15. Blunders [ The famous fifth match game Spassky-Petrosian.¤xd4 £xd4 20.¦xc4 34. A new line has been prepared.a4! h3 ¥f8 14.¤c3 a6 6.¦g6 ¢d5 54.e5 A39 ¦ad8 23.¤d6 ¥xd6 35.¦xb5 ¥a6 26.¥g2 Smejkal.¤c3 c5 5.¢d2 ¥e4 40.£f6 ¤f5 28. 6. .] 19.¦xd1 b4 [ A reasonable option is 15.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 8.¦ab1 b4 Fischer.¤f3 £xa5 ¥g7 6.g5! 41.c6 17.f5 ¥e5 46.4.exd5 ¤e7 17.¦b6 ¦d1 40. 5 and 7.¥xf7+ ¦xf7 ¦ab8 13.¤xe5 [ 20.axb5 B97 axb5 16.¦xd2 ¢xe7 23.] D41 41.¥d2 ¥xd2+ 12.0-0 ¤c6 13.£e3 d5?! [ A more stubborn defence gives Spassky..d4 ¤f6 2.0-0 [ 16.Ng3+.£d2 a6 15.Boris Vasily 2660 £c1+ 28.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¢h2 ¥d6+ 37. ] 22.¥xb5? ¦xa1+ 17.c4 e6 3.¤xd4 ¤xd4 26.cxd4 ¤c6 the world champion like a candidate.c4! bxc4 18..£xf7+ ¤d7?? A blunder spoils everything.¥e2 h5 31.¤b3 £a3 10.fxg7! Fischer.¢f1 b3! 38.¥e5! 35.

e3 ¤bd7 8..¢c3 ¦d2 43.¢xd2 b4 55. [Right is 69.¦xa1 ¦xa1 45.¥f6! a3 39.¦xd4 ¢e2 Fischer.¤a4 ¤e4 16.Robert James Spassky.¥xc4 b5 11.¤f3 d5 3.¦c6 ¦xc6 26.My 160 Memorable Games 54 At last Spassky could show his famous tactical wit.dxe5 10.¦f4 ¦d7 39.¦c3+ ¢d4 70.¤d6 £xd6! 30.¦e1 ¦xf2+ ¢d3 69.¥b3 ¥g7 7.¤c6! ¥xc6 21.¤bd2 Spassky leaves the theory with a quiet move.¥g5 b5 37.¤c5 £c8 25.£xe7+! ¦xe7 30...bxc3 f6 32.] 44..¥e4 So far.¦c1 ¦d8 38.] 38.¥b5? £xb2 22. ] 9.c4 e6 2.g4 £e4 47.¥xf6! ¥xd4 29. Linz 1984).¦a7 38. It is completed when his king arrives 17.Boris Vasily 2660 34.¦f4 a2 40.¥g3 ¢f7?! [Now 34.¥f4 0-0 6.¦f1 ¥b4 40.¥c5 ¦xg7 72.] 20.¢e3 ¦e4+ 38.¢e2 £xf3+ 55.) 28..¦f1 ¦a4! 38.dxe5 ¤a6! 11.¤e5 ¤xe5 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 36.£b4 £xb4 24.b3 ¥e7 52.¥xc6 ¦a7 22.g7 h3 60.¦d6+ ¢c7 66.£c3 [ Spassky had not seen previous analyses..¦f1! ¦h8? [ Purdy gives exclamation marks.£f3 f5 h1£! [No use has 64.¤xd4 28.¤e5 ¤e7 15.¤b3 £d8 consolidation.¦e7+ ¢d6 47.¢f2 ¦c2+ 25.¦c1 ¥a3 49.¢g3 a2 wins easily (Smyslov).¦h7+ and White delivers (Pinter-Martin. I am the only one who talked in depth about this game with one of the players.£c6 £c2 42.¦h7+ ¢e8 wins.¦a1 65.£xa4 ¤c6 20.g6 h4 59.¥e5 61.¤f3 d5 3.¦c1 ¥b4 50.£f3 Another counteraction begins.¥xf6 gxf6 45. ¢b5 56.a3! 35.Boris Vasily Wch28 Reykjavik D37 2785 2660 1972 1.¤c6 perpetual check (Purdy)..¢b2 f4 67.g5 hxg5 [ Annotators mention Fischer.¦xe7+ ¢f8 31.f4 ¥d5 24.¤d4 f6? The pawn is given back.¥f3 a5 ¢e6 46.¥f3 £b5 31.Robert James 2785 32.d4 d6 4.¤f3 ¥d7 18. Mar ¥xc4 41.¤c3 c5 16.e5 ¤d5 3.a3 h6 13.¥e2 ¥xc5 10..¤c3 ¥e7 5.¦d7 h5 36.¦c1?? due to ¤e2+ ] 25.¦c1 ¥e7 51.£e2 ¤xb2 27.Robert James 2785 is elementary.¦xh1 ¢d5 66..¥g3 ¤e5 ¦d8 47.¥f6 ¦xd7 48.¦7d2 ¦xd2 54.¥xc6 ¦c8 27. 16.. ] Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 0-1 1.£xh6 ¥g7! gains control the centre.¤xd4 ¥b7 19.0-0 ¤c5 12.¥b2 ] 69.gxf5+ exf5 52.¥c7 ¦d7 41.¤b5 £c6 29..¤e5+ ¤xe5 36.¥c4 £d2 57.d7 ¥d5 42..¥xe5 ¦ed8 37.c3 is a natural move.£a8+ ¢h7 44.f4 65.¤xa4 40.£e2 £e8! 13.¢g2 ¢g6 48.¦d7+ ¢a6 53.¦a6 ¢f7 34.¦d1+? He gives the wrong check! Bobby 53.¦xb3 ¦c7 76. [ 9.fxg5 f5 Spassky.¥f3 £a6 28.h5 c4! ¦c8 36.c4! 33.¤c3 ¥e7 5.¢xf3 ¥xe1 peeks through his fingers and sees the horror on ½-½ Boris' face.a4 bxa4 13.¦d1 b3+ 64.c4 players have followed Bolbochan-Rossetto..¢e2 70..¥c5 ¢f7 ] 28.¤d7+ (Timman) ] 25.¢xf2 ¥h4+ 54..¤f5 (Smyslov) The i n t e n t i o n i s ¥c4? (" H o w a b o u t 27.¢a1 c2 72.¦e1 ¤b6 The knights move forwards and backwards in fine manoeuvres.¤xd1! Fischer.¥g3 [ Theory will become [ 43.£d2 £d7?! So far.¦h7+ ¥xc6 22.¢d3 ¢e6 . Spassky remarked: "Bobby has less sense of the critical position".0-0 ¥e6 11.d4 ¤f6 4.¤d4 ¥c4 21.¦xa7+ ¢f6 35.c3 ¦ha8 del Plata 1952.¦f3+ ¢d2 74.cxd5 exd5 9....¥h4 0-0 7.fxg5 f5 ] 33.¥e5 [ White cannot regain the pawn by 25.Boris Vasily 2660 f2 [ 74.¤xc5 ¥xc5 37. £b8 20.¥g3 ¥b6 14.e6 26.¤a4 ¦fd8 24.axb4 bxc6 25.¦xc6 ¦xb4 32.¥a3! ¦xg7 75.¥f4 £f6 21. the on the queenside.¥d4 Spassky.¥h4 ¥f5 19.£a7 21..¦e4+ ¢f1 74.] 35.¤e4 ¤bxa4 14.¦c1 ¦c8 12.exd6 ¥xc3 D66 31.a1£ 44..¥xd4 ¤xd4 30.¦d6+ ¢b7 £b5 29. Fischer's great understanding of prophylaxis and the lacking insight of Soviet players is shown in this phase of the game.d4 ¤f6 4. 0-0 8. I showed him the 'potential win' 25.¥e2 £c6 30.. [ Good winning chances are given by 27.¦xc8 ¥xc8 17.¥e5 ¥xa4 19.¥e7 ¦g8 39.¥xc6 ¤c3 23.e6 ¤c4 26.¥a6 ¦c6 34.¤d2 ¥b4 15.h3?! a5! 9.¦ad1 ¦fe8 23.0-0 cxd4 18...¥c4 ¤b6 6. h6 6..g4!? ¥e6 20.¤d3 c5 28.c4 e6 2.h4 32.¦xc4 ¦d7 73.¥g5 h6 18.¦f4 ¦xd4 76.¦exd5+ ¢c6 51.¥e2 £b4 33.¥xh8! 20.exd4 ¦b8 31.¦c1 ¦c8 27. [The simple 21.¥d3 a6 12.] 22.¦d1+ ¢e4 68.¦a1 gxh5 58.¥xc6 ¦ac8 23.¢e1 ¢xd7 50.¦d1 ] 46.¦xf4+ ¢c3 73.dxc5 ¤c6 8.¦f3 c3+ 71.¥f8! h2 62.¦c1 f3 B04 71..¥d3 ¤c5 35.¦h4! ¦aa8 46.¥d3 dxc4 although 37.¢c2 ¢c6 63.¦xe5 ¦xc3+ 48.¤b4 hxg5 34.¢e2 g5 37.¢f1 ¦xd4 33.exf7+ ¢xf7 29.¦h4 e5! 45..¤f3 g6 5.¦h4 ¦g8 10.¥xd4 f6! 29.¥d2 a4 17.¢h2 ¤d7 27.¥xe5 22.¤b5 26.¦c1 c6 9.¥xe5 1.¢g3 ¦a3+ 43..e4 ¤f6 2.¥xa4 ¤xa4 15.a4? The a-pawn becomes weak. 1-0 " "Bravo" Boris answered.h3 49..e3 c5 7. Black conducts an active £a5+ 14.f2 75.

¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¦fc8 22. ] 25.dxc5 £a5 Fischer plays the Pirc as Black for the first time.¤c3 ¤f6 4.d4 cxd4 5.¤g5 ¥xe5 28..¤d2 ¤xd2 19.£f3 £c7 9.a4 17.g3 ¥e5 21.¦a6 ¦e5 52.¢c1? [ An advantage keeps 31. ] 22.h3 ¥xf3 17.¤c4 ¤xe4!? 12.¦c1 ¦b8 18.¢h4 ¦e5 55.£e2 0-0 9.¢c2 ¦d5 36.¢h3 ¦e7 54.My 160 Memorable Games 55 39.¥c2 bxc3 [ 20.¦xd2 ¦b5 26.¥xf6 ¤xf6 [ Black has to give up a pawn due to 13. because he has to play for a win.¦xa6 ¦xh2 34.¥e3 £a5 10.¦cd2 ¦f1 34.£b6+ ¥b7 25.¦fe2 ¦a1 32.¦a7+ ¦d7 38.¥xf3 13.¤d2 £a6 25.¦d3 ¥d6 10.¦xc6 ¦a5 28.¤fxe5 ¥e6 13.¦cc2 ¢f7 22.0-0 f6 6.¦fc2 g5 42.a3! T h e c l o s e d p o s i t i o n i s b e t t e r f o r W h i t e .¦d4 ¦fe8 18.¤f3 d6 3.g4 brings a pleasant endgame.¦xd6 ¦xf2 33.¤xb5 (Timman).fxg6 hxg6 is okay.¥xc4 £xc4 22.£xf7 ¦d7?! [Right is 28.¥xa4 £xa4 35.¤xd4 ¤f6 6.£g7 £f5 38.¢h2 ¦c1 29..¦b6 ¦e1 58.e4 d6 2.¦hf1 ¤c4 21.¤xa4! 34.¢b1 b4 14.£g3 b4 16.bxc3 £xc3 15. the players have followed Unzicker-Perez. Moscow 1971)..¦c1 bxc4 17. ] 16..¦c2 ¥d6 27.¦g7 ¢f6 40.¥xf6 gxf6 12.¤f3 c5 6.] 19.¤c3 a6 6.¦fe2 ¦f1 36.a4 ¤d3+?! [Annotators praise 33.¦f3 ¦e4 50.Boris Vasily Fischer.0-0 ¥g4 11.c3 b3?! [ T h e p r e f e r a b l e 18.¤f3 d6 3.f5 a5 16.d4 g6 3.] 22.. ¥xc3 14..¦f2 ¤e5 28.¢g2!? [ 22.d4 cxd4 4..¦c4 ¦f1 39.¦c1 ¦e2 43..¦xc3 (Geller).f4 ¥e7 8. ] 23.¢f3! White does not have to worry about the lost pawns..£e5 £a1+ ] 34..d4 Fischer plays a favourite opening at last.¤db5! axb5 26. 15.¥xf6? 14.£xb4 ¦xb4 leads to exchanges. Spassky is prepared.¥g5 e6 7.¤xf3 0-0 14.c3 ¤c5 20..¦b4 £c1+ 41. [ 21.¢e4 ¦xa2 31..¦f3 ¦f6 48.bxc3 £b6+ A g r e a t b a t t l e r a g e s o n t h e b o a r d .¢h1 £e5!? Black forces the draw in a special way.¤c6+! ¥xc6 24.fxg6 hxg6 25.¤xa4? 21.¤f3 ¦d8 26.¢xe4 cxd2 25.£xf3 ¤a5 18..f4 ¥e7 10.f4 ¥g7 5.¥c6 ] 23..¦f2 ¦e1 35.¦xb2! 23.¦f7 g6 46.c4 ¦ab8 16..¢g2 ¦a1 60.¢h3 ¦h1+ 59.f5 ¤f6 16.¢h4 ¦e4+ 53.£xh5 ¥xc3 30.¦a5 h6 43.¥d3 £xc5 8.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦a3 ¢h6 51.¦b2 £a1+ 42.¦xd1 fxe5 9.¦he1 ¥b7 12.¢f3 ¦a3+ 30.¦c1 ¦e2 45.¥xa4 bxc3 22. ] 12.¦a6+ ¢e7 37.¦a2 £c1+ 43..¤a4 ¦hg8 17.¦c1 £c4 is refuted by 23.¤xd4 ¦e5 26.¦f2+ ¢g5 45...0-0-0 ¥d7 9..e4 e5 2.¥d3 b5 11.¦e3 ¦c8 24.¤xe5 (Bronstein-Lenguel..¦ee2 ¤c6 30.fxe5 ¥h8 [ Risk takes 24.¥xc6 dxc6 5.¦e2 prevents the next move.¤xc3 ¥f6 22.¦xd2 ¦e4 20.cxb3 £c5+ 21.£h8+ ¢a7 33.¦d3 £c7 19.¤cxe5?! [A plus keeps 12.£a5 32.¦b4 ¢h6 57.£b6+ ] 31.Robert James Spassky. ¥g4 7.¦a3 ¦e6 49. 31.e4 c5 2.¦c2 ¦e1 31.e5?! dxe5 24.¢b1 ¢b8 19.£xg7 ¦df8 15.¦b1 £a5 33.¦1c2 ¦e1 44. ] 14.¦dc2 ¦a1 40.¥d3 £a5 13.¦a7+ ¢f6 36.Boris Vasily Wch28 Reykjavik B69 2785 2660 1972 1.¥h6 ¤xb3 20..¢a3 £d2 40.£d1! ¢c7 24.¢a1 [ 23.g3 h5 23.¢h3 ¦a4 ½-½ Spassky.Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik B99 2660 2785 1972 1.f3 ¥xe5 14.£h6!? b3 17.¤f4 [ Fischer avoids the adventures of 16. ¤e5 20.£d4! £xd4 25.¢h3 ¢f6 41..£d2 a6 8.Robert James Wch28 Reykjavik B09 2660 2785 1972 1.¤f3 b5 11.¥xe5?! 25.¦f4 h5 47.£h6 £xc3 37. 7.¤d4 [ 24.¦xf4 ¤d7 27. ¦a4+ 29.¦b5 24.¢f3 ¦d2 35.¦d7! 37.¢a1! ¦d2 32.£h8+ ¢a7 34.¥b3!? Spassky sacrifices a pawn.Robert James Spassky. ] 21..¦a2 ¢f5 44.. Oberhausen 1961.¥g5 e6 7.¦a2 ¢e6 39.¥xd3 ¦xd3 35.¦1c2 ½-½ Fischer.£h5 seeks the attack..¦e3 a6 37.¦c3 ¦e1 38.£g3 0-0-0!? 13.¦d4 ¦c7 ] 37.¦b2 £a1+ ½-½ Fischer.£f2 ¤d7 18.¢g3 ¢g7 33.¦ce1 ¢d8!? [ The 'logical' positional move is 22.cxb4 £xb4 20.0-0-0 ¤bd7 10.¤e5! 19.e4 c5 2..¢g2 ¦e7 40.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 27.] .¦e4 ¦d8? [ The attack continues with 36.¢b3 £d5+ 39.¥xf8 ¦xf8 23.¦ad1 ¤c6 12.¦b2 e5 (Timman) 35.¥b5 a6 4.dxe5 £xd1 8.. c3 24.¥f4! The exchange of bishops leads to a drawn rook ending.¦b6 ¢g7 56.Boris Vasily Wch28 Reykjavik C69 2785 2660 1972 1.£f4 £xf4 26.¥e3 b5 15.¦f2 ¦e1 41.¥c4 ¤h5 13.¦a6+ ¦e6 42.¦d7 ¢e6 ½-½ Spassky.¤e2 £c5 So far.¥xb5! axb5 15.£h7! ¦d7 36..axb3 a4 because he wants to draw.hxg3 £xg3 ] 29.¤bd2 ¤f6 11.¤dxb5 (Timman).¥xd6 cxd6 32.¥xg3! 29.¤c3 ¤c6 4.

.¢d3 Fischer.¥h5! cxd5 Spassky. ¦d4 42.¦c5 ¦b8 27.g3 .¦xf7 The Soviet seconds are Fischer.c6 ¦xc6 37.¢h2 ¦a6 36.¦c1+ ¢b7 39.e4 c5 2..b6+.£h5 g6 15.d4 cxd4 4.¤xf3 ¦fxd8 16.b3 c4 19.¢f3 ¦c3+ 40.¤d3 ¦d4 33.¢f2 ¦c2+ 20..¥e6 ¦b2 39.¢e2 ¥a5! 32.¢g2 ] 35. superior level in the games 13 and 19.¦b8!? 29.f4 f5 30.) 30..b4 bxc5 [ Pressure can be relieved ½-½ by 16.¥c4 from the known 11.£h6 £f3 47...¢d3! ¢e6 33..d4 cxd4 4.¤b4 h5 27.cxd6 ] simplification.¢d3 ¥f7 44.¤xf3 gxf3 43.¢g3 Spassky keeps the equality..0-0 ¥d6 10..¥xe7 ¤xd2 14.£xd2 ¥xd2 23..¦xd6 31.e6 ¥e5! 28.¦a5 25.exd6 ¢f7 the game Anderssen-Minckwitxz.¤f3 ¥g4 5.¤f3 e6 3.g3 Spassky.£xd7 e4 15..¥d4 0-0 12.¤d3 f6 26.¤d4 36.¦a5 30.¢h1 ¥e6 [ 12.¥f4!? ] 25.fxe6 fxe6 31.¦xf2 '?' 28.£f3 lead to a draw.¤c3 ¤c6 [ 5..¥c6 39.c4 ¤b6 9..Szabo.¥d3 d5! 8.¤e1 ¤e6 54.Robert James 2785 impressed by the next move.¦f4! Black cannot do anything..h4! stops the counteraction. [ 19.£xf6 gxf6 31..¥xc4 ¦d2 '±!' ½-½ 23.exd5 25.¥xf7+! ¦xf7 21.¦xf5 d5 34.¥xe2 ¦d8 26.¤f5 ¥xf5 33.] 24.¥c4 ¦a2! [ 27..] 11.¥e6 h5 White is lost in the adjourned .cxb4 ¦d5 38.¤xd4 a6 [ T h e g r e a t c o m p l i c a t i o n s o f 24...¥xf6 £xf6 15..¦fe1 c5! Fischer forces a 30. C h e s s w a s p l a y e d o n a Fischer applies the Alekhine for the second time..¤e3 ¥e6 43.¢f3?! [ 29.¦c7+ ¦d7 37.¤ef2 h5 34.¢f3 ¢e7 31. 28.¦xd5 ¦e8 29.a5 ¢c5 37.¦xc6 ¦xc6 32.h3 ¥h5 8.£e4 ¦c8 40.¤e5 ¤xe5 (Jansa-Pavlovic.¦h7 Fischer has avoided the battle.¥e2 0-0 11.¥e3 [ 6.a6 ¢b6 38. 21.£h7 £c6 ½-½ del Plata 1955).. ] 22.e4 ¤f6 2. 15..¦fe1 ) ¥xd4 27.¤xc6 bxc6 11..¦c1! is dangerous for Black..¢f2 ¦g5 41.¤f6 7.¢g3 Fischer.£h6 £f3 45.¢e3 h5 39.¦xh5 ¥xb4 37.] 29.¦c3 ¦d8 25.b3!? choosing enterprising openings.exd5 £xd5 35.¤d3+ ¢d6 50.¤f2! ¢d6 B05 44. 31.¦xd8 ¦xd8 20. Fischer kept 10.0-0-0 ¥d7 40.¦c7! dxe4! 5.¥h4 ¤xe4! 13.¥c4 ¦g1 1.a3 axb4 18.¢c3 ¢c6 45.¥xd5 ¢f6 39..bxc5 £a5 18.Boris Vasily 2660 42..c5 ¥xf3 12..¤e1 e5 [Annotators prefer 38.. ..¢xf1 ¦d8 29.¦f2 e5 32.¥f3 [ Fischer diverts 36.] 27.0-0 ¥e7 7.fxe3 b6?! [Petrosian prefers 14..¢d3 ¥g6+ 48. Fischer B46 starts a prophylactic manoeuvre.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¤c5 ¦b8!? Spassky wants to play. 19.¥d5 ¦a2 31..¤c6 ] middle game cautiously from game 15 on.¦h5 16.¤d3 ¢c7 26.¢c3 ¤d4 1.¦c5 ¦d5 35.exd5 exd5!= Black follows exf1£+ 28.b4! ¦a4 31.¤g4 13.¦a5 a6 38.¢e4 ¥e1 9.b5 ¦xc4 32.g3 ¢d6 29.g4?! Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 [ 30.¦e2 ¦xe2 25.¤a4= ] 19..a5 ¢f8 29.¤c6! is okay.¤b4 is alright for White.¦xd5 ¥xh2+ 21.g3 ] 30.e5 dxe5 13..f4 ¥e7 10.¦hd1 ¢e7 18.¥g8? h6 33.¢c3 ¢c5 Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 49.¥e6 ¢f4 37.¥xa6 ¦xc2 24..¦xc6 e3 ( O l a f s s o n ) 26.£h4 14.gxf5 f6 32.¤c3 0-0 g a m e s ( + 1 .¢e5 9.] 29.¤a4 ¥e8 19.a5 17.¥e2 ¦ab8 18.¦f7 ¦d6 44. Theory will become 11.¥g5 e6 7.¥e2 The results were even in the second series of ten e6 6..¤d1! ¢d6 [ After 41.£d2 a6 8.¦c3 [ 27..¢d2 ¥f5 41.h3 ¤h2? ( 13.£h6 ] 13.e5 ¤d5 3.¢xh2 ¦xd5 22.¥c4 ¦b2= ] 28.¤xd4 ¤f6 36.d4 d6 4.¦d6 ¦xd6 30.¤xd5! ¥g5! Capture of the knight leads to horror.¤b3 (De Greiff .f6! ) 30.a3 a4 24.Robert James 2785 ¢c5 46.¢d2 ¢c5 52.] Spassky.h6 12..¤b4 £d7 36..f5! 31.fxe5 fxe5 40.¤e4+ ¢e7 31.¦xd7+ ¥xd7 38. [ 21. £d2! Capture of the Wch28 Reykjavik 1972 rook permits a horrible attack.¤d3 [ A f i n e p o s i t i o n a l s o l u t i o n g i v e s 28.. but he played the ¤xe3 14.¥xd8 ¤xf3 15.bxc5 ¥g5 ] 17.¤ed3! ¢d6 41.a6 ¦b2 ( 29. Berlin 1866.¢e7 30.£e2 [ 29.axb4 ¦xa1 19.a7 B68 ¦a4 33.¤c3 d6 6.¤f3+ 42.¢g2? [Right is 35.¢d2 ¤f5 but 40..¢e4 ¢d6 47...¦d6! ¢f7 [Fischer avoids 30..£xa1 bxc5 20.£e2 £c5 32.My 160 Memorable Games 56 24.¤xd5! h6 35.¦ad1 ¦fd8 17.e4! c6 16.¦c3?! [ Better is 35.fxe6 fxe6 31. Mar ¦a2 40.¢d2 ] 35.¦d3 a5 22.¢f3 ¦a1 35..¦d7 ¥e3+ 26. 6.¦xe5 ¢f6 33. = 8 .¢e3 e4 the passed pawns are blockaded.¤f3 £a5 12. ] 39.¥e3 d5 11.¦d5 ¢e6 34.1 ) .¥d7 ¦b1 38.¦xd6 ¢f8 17.¦b3 b5 23.Boris Vasily 2660 20.¦af1 ¤c6 24.£h7 £c6 46.exd5 14/374 1..] 28.. 14.¥f1! ¦xf5 42..¢g3 ¢d6 34.g3 ¦e5!? S p a s s k y w a n t s c o m p l i c a t i o n s .¥xf3 ¤c4 13.a4 ¦d2 27...¦xe6 e2 27.¤d3+ ¢d6 53.fxe5 30.¢f2! 6.¦a2? 30. Nis 1970).£g6 £c6 43.Robert James 2785 ¢f8 29.¦e1 ¦xe6 14.¦b1 ¢b6 41.¥xf6 ¥xf6 14.¤xe5! dxe5 ( 29.g5 28.e4 c5 2.Boris Vasily 2660 builds a fortress (Karpov).¤e1 ¦d8 32.£c7 ] 6.f3 h4 5.¤e1 ¢c6 51.¤c5 g4 30.

The real Bobby had great plans for his future activities. 16. [ 40. 11.¦xh7 ¢xh7 39.f4 16..Be7. in this case g4 and e4. 10. 9.. 9.¤d3 White now contr ols f4 as well as g5.b4 draws according to Timman.£c2 c5 Another error. =11. g3 fxg3 18. Fischer played 12.¢h3 ¦xf2 ( 41. In the other games the action heated up eventually. .¦h5 The threat is 24.¤e6 ¤h7 43.¥d5 ¢e5 46. which is difficult to counter. 22. though the real test does not come in the present game. so there really is no possibility of kingside counterplay f o r B l a c k . since the knight at e7 cannot be brought to h6 because White will plant a pawn at g5.¦dg1 ¤h7 18.Rgxh3 19.¦h4 ¥xf3 36. as does 14.¥e1 ¤f6 45. [The interesting 41. 15.a6 ¦h1+ 44.Be1! and Black's king must worry about getting mated! 44.¤f3 ¦bf7 30. -3). but there are serious problems anyway.¤bd2 0-0 In game 4. it prevents a4-a5.My 160 Memorable Games 57 position. ¦h7 38.f3 0-0 6..b5 ¢d6 48. for example 19.Qe8 is possibly a bit more resistant. g5 Fischer did not want to endure White's persistent pressure.¤d3 This is a decisive transfer of White's knight to the blockading square f3. a4! uncomfortable. 18.¢g2 ¦a3 45. Fischer must have underestimated White's potential energy on the kingside.¥c4 ¦a2 47... 13.. They had lost the 'match of the century'.. It is perhaps not an appropriate move in this position.¤f2 This is the logical continuation of White's strategy.¢c6 ¢e7 54. 12. after which the pawn at h4 can become very weak. His knights suffer from the lack of entry squares on the kingside. Bobby was better" Boris answered me. 35. Black cannot capture at e4 because of the check at e6..f3 ¢f4 43.¦ac1 13..a4 bxa4 14..¥e2 ¤h7 Black prepar es to launch kingside counterplay with f7-f5.d4 ¤f6 2.¥xc4 c5 6.¤c7 ¢f7 42.Boris Vasily Fischer.f4 might still be best.¤b5 ¢h8 Pointless.fxg4 f4 Much too late. ¤f6 14.¤c1 This is the real new idea.¢b5 ¢f6 53.Bf5+ 40. limiting Black's counterplay at each turn and taking control of more squares.¥e2 ¥b7 11. but the win is still simple.¥h4 ¢h7 46..0-0 a6 7.b6 ¦xa4 46.Rb8!? 1 0.Bxh6 gxf2+ was a better plan.¥c6 (Krogius) ¦b2 45. Not this time.¤f3 ¤f6 4.Nh3 Bxh3 23. This shuts down any queenside action on Black's part. but Krogius gives the win ( 42. 52.. ¦bb7 27.¦gh1 ¥f8 25.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1. 47.¥d5! ] 41.¥e2 ¥f2 50.8 1/2 (+7. 15. e5 9..¥d7 Spassky resigned due to ¢g4 42..£h3 White dominates the entire board and the success of his attack is beyond question.¥xf3 ¤xg5 37.a5 ¦f1! 43. h5 9. Here he reserves e7 for his bishop..¢g2 ¦a1 45. a situation brought about by 8. hxg4 20.c4 g6 3.¤c3 ¥g7 4.b6 ¢c6 49.d5 ¤e7 10. 41.h5. ¦f7 24.¦xg7+ ¦xg7 34.¢g5 43.¥f3+ ¢xf5 44.¢d3 ¢g6 41.¤e1 ¦g7 28.e3 e6 5.f i l e . f5 13. £xg4 32... ¢g8 28.0-0-0 b6 17.£b3 ¦b8 26. Fischer's opening choice shows similarity to Boleslavsky's approach: Solidity with White and prophylaxis with Black..b5 ¦f3+ 44..£h5 Strong and simple. but a consistent follow-up to the previous mistake.. Little resulted from his high ideals.Rxa4 Nb6 gives Black a fully satisfactory game.Bd2 Bh6 17.¥b2 ¤bd7 12. 29.c4 dxc4 3.¢c4 ¥d4 51.e4 d6 5.Kf6 44.¥c4 ¢xf5 46.. "Could a better preparation with Boleslavsky have changed the outcome of match?" "No. Nb3 Bd7 is more consistent with Black's strategy.dxc5 £xd1 8. He had won with 12 1/2 ..Nd4 is probably stronger. but it can lead to more normal lines if White chooses to transpose.cxd5 ¥xh4 48.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1.¦h6 Desperation.¥f7 ¤xd5 This regains a little material.b7 ¢c7-+ ) 42.¢g5 42.¤g7 1-0 D27 Spassky..¥d2 It is now clear that Black has no counterplay.¥h5+ ¢g8 43. .Nxe4 40.Ke7 but found 13.b3 ¢g6 Black's king cannot protect his soldiers.¥d7 Robert James Fischer became world champion on 1 ix 1972.h4 A very unusual move in this position.¢c2 ¥e7 39. and his king is in danger on t h e h .b4 ¢e5 47.. The main basis of the attack is the weakness of g6.¦xh5 ¥g4 Black is just down a piece here. The search for a Russian Bobby led to a new Soviet champion in 1973: Boris Spassky.Bd2 Rf7 20.¦xg6 £xh5 33.g4 The prelude to a direct kingside attack.Qd2 Rb8 is also possible.a4 White prevents Black from playing a freeing b7-b5. aiming for an early break with b5.¢g4! 41. The Soviets were in a state of shock.¦xd1 ¥xc5 Another quiet opening. There is no way to save the knight. 21.Rxg3 Nf8 22.¢h3 ¢f4 ] 0-1 E83 Spassky..Boris Vasily Fischer.Rhg1.¥e3 ¤c6 7.¥c6 h4 43.b3 b5 Fischer boldly plays the extended fianchetto again! 10. but well justified.¤ge2 a6 8. a5 A simply horrible move.hxg5 ¤g6 23.b7 ¦b4 . A rematch took place after twenty years.g4 fxg3 21. £d7 31. but this is a desperate sacrifice which only hastens the end.¥g4 A last finesse.d4 d5 2.¥d5! ) 42.¥h5 ¢h6 49. but eliminates any chance of getting in b7-b5.

f5 By sacrificing a piece for two pawns. ¢e7 Now the occupation of this square by the king is appropriate.squared bishop seems more important. English.Rxe3 Bxc4 23.Qxd4 cxd4 with e q u a l c h a n c e s i n t h e e n d g a m e . but which one? The dark. He plans to go his own way in this opening. b6 8. Now Black can develop counterplay quickly.Bd3 Qxd5?? 14.Kxe2 Qh2+ 34.. enabling White to complete his d e v e l o p m e n t .¤e1 ¤dc5 29.£a3 23.. 15.¢f2 ¦xe1 Spassky. Fischer pulls yet another surprise opening out of his sleeve.Rxe7 Bxb3 24. ¥d6 The position is completely equal.¤df3 10. 4. ¦f8 18.Rxe3? Be4! e2 25.¦c1 13.axb3 Rxe2 with a drawish endgame. ¤bd7 7. 24.¦dc1 ¦ac8 21.c4 c5 3.¦fc1 22. 32. 17.¤f5+ gxf5 ½-½ E70 E07 Fischer.¥xe7 £xe7 17.Qxe3 Rxe4 27.Bd3.g3 The choice of the kingside fianchetto means that we are headed for a Tarrasch. and Spassky opts for the closed v a r i a t i o n .Robert James Spassky. neither opting for the popular Benko Gambit nor playing the standard modern Benoni idea of e7.dxc5 bxc5 Black's hang ing pawns at c5 and d5 are strong in this configuration. 19. Black attacks both of White's bishops. g5 8.Bxf5!? deserves consideration. exploiting the pin at d5. 9. and White can hope for a minimal advantage.¤xd2 ¤xd2+ 32. 19.Bc2 f4 15.¤c3 g6 5.¢e2 ¤c4 ½-½ 27.¦xc7 ¥xc7 25.. since White's r o o k s a r e m i s p l a c e d . ¦xb2 Now White must force the draw. One can compare game 6 of the first match. £h3 29.¦c2 White is almost out of the woods. Rxc4 Rd2! 25. and this is all Fischer needs to get things going.exf3 24.¦c3 ¥d5 This preserves the important e-pawn.¤dxf3 e5 23. The piece sacrifice is romantic and worthy of consideration. 12. 22.O-O 9. exd5 9.¤xb4 ¤bd2+ 31.¥xg5 ¤e4 The excellent coordination of Black's forces lead to simplifications without risk. f4 16.¥g2 ¥e7 5.Bb5+ wins the queen.h4 Rf8 and White has a hopeless position.0-0 0-0 6. or Hedgehog. 9.¤xg3 Things have calmed down a bit.¥d3 Inviting immediate complications.Boris Vasily Fischer. ¤e4 11.Rd3 Qh3 29.Rxe3? 30.Bf3 maintains strong pressure at d5. although Fischer did play the English in the first match too..cxd5 The double fianchetto approach.¥f3 ¥xf3 Now the pieces fly off the board and a peace pact is forthcoming..¦c2 ¦c7 20.¥d3 White has to part with one of his bishops.Nxe3? Qe4 ¦ad8 20.£d5 31.bxc3 £xc3+ 12. Kd2 and the d1-square is covered by the Qb3.Rxe8+ Rxe8 25.¤e2 fxg3 17.Ne2 Qf6 14. Qxc4+ 13. ¤xe4 10.h3 ¢f8 15. Qd2 is correct.Qh5+ Kd8 15. but this is still known to theory.Bd3 would give White excellent attacking prospects. at best. where they proved to be weak. Nf3 and 6.¤e3 £xh2 29. g6 23. bxa4 Bc6 with good counterplay. deprives the enemy monarch of his castling privilege and thereby disrupts the communication of the rooks. but there was a less interesting drawing line. 28.¤bd2 This is a fairly popular line.f3 Now the question is whether the pawn at e3 is strong or weak.Qxe4 Qd4+! 28.¥g5 This is played in the spirit of the Averbakh Variation of the King's Indian.¤e5 ¥b7 10.My 160 Memorable Games 58 ¦fc8 14..¥xe4 ¥xc3+ 11.¦xc7 ¦xc7 24. h6 7.Ne3 Rxe3! 30. Usually the bishop retreats along the c1-h6 diagonal and later forms a battery with the queen. e6 2. 22.¦c1 c5 13.¢f1 After a few forced moves Black is a piece down for two pawns.¤c2 ¤xb3 30. Now White must play with extreme caution. 16.Rxe3 Qf1+ 31.¥h4 An unusual choice.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1.d5 d6 Like a conjurer.£b3 28.¥xe4 dxe4 17. This line leads to greater complications appropriate to the match standing.¤a3 b4 27.¢xe1 £d7 There are tw o threats here: Qd1+ and Qh3. 16. but does not place much pressure at d5.Qa4 was preferred by Deep Thought.. 12. and Black has an extra pawn.¤e1 16.Ndc4 perhaps makes better use of the long diagonal.Qc2?? would lose to Rxb2!! 32.¤c2 ¤e4 26.. 30.c4 Something of a surprise. but some weak light-squares. 14.Qxe5 18.¢f1 Both kings head for the center. but White's material advantage cannot be maintained..a4 bxa4 17. Catalan.axb5 axb5 19.¥g3 £a5 Black must not delay his counterplay! 8. ¤d7 Black returns the .Kd3 Qxb2 and White's pawns will fall quickly.Bxc4 24.£b3 ¦fe8 21. but his rook still stands idly at h1.e6.Boris Vasily Belgrade 1992 1. Rxe3 Qf1+ 31.¤c4 f6 28.g4 ¦b8 31.Kd2 Qd1+ and a draw will result.¤f3 ¤f6 3.¤c4 e3 This is a bold attempt to punish White for ignoring Nimzowitsch's principle that central pawns must be blockaded. ¥xf3 Spassky pl ays with youthful vigor.Qxb2 Qg1+ 33.h4 14. g4 15.Re4 Qd7 26.h4 g4! A theme later exploited by Fischer. 13. 23. Still a wide choice! d5 4.£d8+ ¢g7 33.e4 ¥g7 6. 18. £f6 14.d4 Now we have a Catalan Opening.a4 ¥c6 18..d4 ¤f6 2. Other ideas include 6.¦e1 ¦d1 26.¤g5 ¤xg5 15.¥f4 ¤df6 Black has achieved full equality.

Qxb6 and the safety of the White king means that the ap a w n f l i e s . d6 8. 33. The presence of the rook at d1 has little effect. 29.¤ge2 e5 4.Bg5 O-O and control of g4 gives Black a good game.£b5 20. and then adopt the knight maneuver with Ng8-f6-g4. Fischer spent 25 minutes on this move..dxc5 £xd1 8.¤bd2 Spassky decides not to repeat the f i a n c h e t t o p l a n o f t h e p r e v i o u s g a m e s . 24. It is probably more flexible than the development of the bishop at c4.¢f1 ¤xc5 32.bxc5 ¥e6 35..0-0 c5 7.¤d3 f6 Fischer defends accurately.g4 Bg5! gives Black excellent c o u n t e r p l a y . ¦xd6 33.£xc4 £xh5 26. but that could not be played right away.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1. ¤d7 13. 10. f5 15.. ¦xc1 16.¥e2 ¥b7 12.¦b7 It is clear that White's strategy must involve penetration of the q u e e n s i d e . of course.¦xc8+ ¥xc8 18.¥xc4 e6 6. But so many pieces leave the board that Fischer reaches a drawn game without difficulty.£e3 £f6 31. 29.Robert James Spassky.. exf4 27. but these clerics are not very active right now. B x e 5 d x e 5 3 1 .¢f2 ¢d7 36. 14.bxc5 bxc5 17. R x e 7 R x f 3 ! e5 Fischer finishes with surgical precision. R h b 1 R x g 2 + b6 30.Bc3 Rf2? 28.h3 h4 10.¢h2 exf4 Opening up the position now favors White.£e4 ¥d7 21.file. who controls the e.¥e4 g6 26. 27. since otherwise Black will simply complete his development and enjoy a comfortable game.¥f1 22. 22. ¤ge7 5.¦e2 Now we can see that the second rank needs protection. R x e 5 N f 6 ! dxe5 31.Bg4!? deserves c o n s i d e r a t i o n .¦xf7 ¢xf7 22..f5 is tempting.¥xf4 ¥e5 28.Qxe5 32.¤a5 ¥d6 21.Boris Vasily Belgrade 1992 1.¥xe5 £e7 31. is to bring the knight to a5. 0-0 According to reports from the scene.¤fd4 ¤b8 19. because the knight will be able to gallop to g4.¤ec3 ¤xd5 6. but it is best.¢g1 0-0-0 Black is now ready for action.¤db3 Spassky methodically increases the positional pressure on the queenside. 10.Rf2 exf4 ¥c6 34. but now Black's forces are too far from the important strategic ouposts at e5 and d7.¤xc5 ¥b6 33. compared with Black's pieces. ¦b6 Preventing Qc6.¦ac1 ¦fc8 15.Boris Vasily Fischer.£c6 White wants to play Rb1. and it cannot be brought into the game quickly. 0-1 D27 Spassky. 22. Ng8! is a strange move.¥g2 h5 This threatens to a d v a n c e t h e h .Bh3! 12. 24.£xg4 ¤e5 20.¦d2 3 2 . 26.£a4 ¥f6 How should this position be evaluated? A bishop pair is useful.¥f3 ¦dg8 29.Kh2 Ng4+ 23.¤bc5 ¤c4 30.¥xc4 ¥xc4 ½-½ B23 Fischer.h4 9. 28.f4 Fischer tries to grab the initiative right way.£xa7 . but it does not succeed.¤c3 ¤c6 3.Bxe5?! dxe5 and Black can cover the sixth rank with Rb6. 23. but it is not strong: Nf6! 15.¦e2 ¥b5 32. and thus freeing the knight from the defensive chore.¥f3 ¢f8 20. while his opponent is still playing without a rook.Qxa7+ Ne7 33.exf4 ¤b6 28.¦xc1 ¦c8 17.¥b2 ¤bd7 Both sides have employed the extended fianchetto and there is a great deal of symmetry.Kg1 26.¥e2 £f7 28.p a w n w i t h g r e a t e f f e c t .¥d5+ ¢f8 35.. though Black's position was in any event difficult.e4 c5 2.¦xd1 ¥xc5 9.. R b 1 N d 7 a n d B l a c k h a s n o p r o b l e m s .¢f1 ¥xf3 Spassky resigned in the face of Qa1+.¤d5 This knight immediately occupies Black's weak square.Nd4?! 12.d6 Opening up d5 for the bishop. Q x e 7 Q x e 7 3 3 .h3 ¤fd7 24.b4 b6 16. e5 This takes control of the critical d4square and limits the scope of the Bb2.d3 ¥xd5 11. 9.¤c5 ¢e7 23. 19. ¤g8 An outrageous blunder. ¦f7 21.d4 d5 2.e3 ¤f6 5. Nevertheless.fxe5 would have given White some chances.¥d2 ¦b8 23. 19.exd5 ¤b8 11.Kf2 Qg7 30.¥d3 ¥xc5 34.f4 ¤xc4 A crucial inter mediate move. 7.¦b1 Fischer now turns his attention to the queenside. 3 0 .g3 The fianchetto of the bishop is an innovation which leads to quite different play from that of the normal lines.Rb2?! 27. 23.¤xd5 ¥e7 7..gxf4 Rb8 30.¤b7 ¥c7 29.¦e1 ¤e7 25..a3 Finally Spassky returns to the realm of ordinary theory..My 160 Memorable Games 59 pawn for rapid mobilization. b5 11.¥c1 ¤d7 31.¤h5 £f7 25.f4 A last attempt to try to stir up some action..¢h3 White's king finds the s a f e s t s q u a r e .dxe6 33..¦b2 ¦g3 The beginning of the final offensive. initiated at the ninth turn. ¤b6 20.b4 ¥e7 13. 14.Qc6 Rc8 accomplishes nothing for White. White will still have an advantage.¦xe5 This is the easiest w a y t o w i n .Bxf4 30.Kg1 Qa1+ 22. 27.Rxg3 24.£a4 £c7 26. 32.¤b3 The idea behind this plan.. fxg6 fxg6 16.c3 Nf5 13. 25..c4 0-0 18.c4 dxc4 3. ¥e6 9.¤f3 a6 4.¥xd6 £xd6 34. ¤c8 This parri es the threat of Rb1.Nh5 Qf7 22. The game is now level.£b3 29.Bc4 is a major a l t e r n a t i v e . f3 Rg8! ¦g8 23.0-0 g6 14.

49..Ke7 Qh7+ 61.c6 £d6 The c-pawn just marches along.Bc6 would have been a useful move.¦fd1 b6 18.¦ee2 ¦a3 43. Kf7 Qg8+! 60.Qxc7 49.¢f4 £h6+ 60.a7 £xa7 46. since the pawns create a barrier against perpetual check.¤e2 ¤f6 3.¢e4 1-0 1992 1. Fischer's endgame play in this game was simply terrible. Qxe6 and tried to grovel in the endgame.hxg5 ¢xg5 67.Qxf7 is stalemate! 55.d4 cxd4 4.£e5+ ¢h7 58.Kg5 Qxd3?? 55.a5 h5 50.¢d1 £h1+ 65.Ra2 Ra6 53. £a8 Now that there are weaknesses on the a-file.£f2 h6 19.g3 ¤c6 Finally we have a fairly normal Closed Sicilian.¢g2 55.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1.dxc5! would have won.f5 A n i m p o r t a n t t h r u s t ! ¦a8 37.¦a2 Simple technique brings the game to a close.¤cxe4 ¤f5 32. Black should have played 48.Ne8 comes into consideration.£xb5 ¦d3 Spassky targets g3.¢c2 Now there is no avoiding the perpetual check. and he must have been kicking himself all night.c4 ¤f6 7..¦e2 ¢h7 57.£d2 16.a4 ¦c3 47.Bg4 is a sensible try...e5 ¤e4 28. 20. ..¢a3 £a7+ 80.c7 ¦xc7 This is the decisive mistake..£xh5 £c7 51..f4 ¥d7 9.£e2 £c7 Perhaps Spassky decided that Nc3-d5 was no big deal.Robert James Spassky. £e4+ ½-½ B44 Fischer.h4 £c5 52.¢g2 ¢f6 62.Qe8+ Kh7 50.¢e2 62.f4 ¤g6 This is not the normal position for a knight in this setup. pinning the knight and encouraging the weakening move f2-f3 but it hasn't been seen in a while. ¤e5 14.£g5+ ¢f8 49.¤xd4 e6 5.d3 0-0 The game is in the classical spirit.Qxd1 Bxe4 ¤e7 The knight prepares to o c c u p y d 5 .£e3 £h2+ 64.b4 It is necessary to stop Black's b-pawn from advancing and taking control of valuable t e r r i t o r y .¢c3 £xh4 67.... but there was an interesting alternative in 26. 9.¦c2 d5 This is gener ally a strong strategic move in the Sicilian.Rc6 51.£b8+ ¢h7 50. 26.Boris Vasily Belgrade axb5 25.Qg6+ and White wins easily.¤f3 ¤c6 3. but in any event 20. since White has not completed development.¤b3 ¤d4 34.Qa3!? 27.Kd8 Qxh4+ 62.. 39. £f7 55. 5.£xf4 g1£ 44. 12.¢b3 ¢e7 81. but it is playable. 68.h5! was best.¦e1 31. 32. leading to unclear complications. Nowadays Black usually prefers to place the knight at e7 when fianchettoing the king bishop.¦xe3 ¦xe3 46.¦a5 e5 61.¤xd4 ¦xd4 35. as it used to be his speciality. ¦a7 60. 16.£b5 £c7 75.£g6+ ¢h8 52.Qa4 is an interesting option. 10.¥e3 ¥d7 13.¥xf5 gxf5 47.. 38.e4 c5 2.¥xe4 dxe4 29.¢c2 ¢f8 76.£a6 £f4+ 84.. 0-0 9. 8.¤a3 £c7 11.¤5c3 ¥e7 8.¤d2 b5 24.¥c5 This is very strong.¤ab1 £b7 23.0-0 ¥g7 7. 41.d5 68.£d2+ ¢g6 56.£a6 £h2+ 77.£b1+ ¢h6 54.Bg2?? Qg4++ ¤f5 42.£b7 ¢f8 38..g4 is premature.bxc5 ¦d8 31. but Spassky creates some complications.¢e3 ¢f5 64. 11.¢d3 £d6 70.d4 ¢h7 67. Spassky has a great deal of experience in these positions from the White side. achieving the strategic goal of closing the c-file..e4 c5 2.g3 This seems to be a new idea.Qxd6 Rxd6 52.£xf5+ ¢g7 48. 33.¦a3 g5 66.£e4 ¢h8 62.fxe6 fxe6 39. 25. The bishop is usually developed at e2.£a8+ ¢g7 37..¢b3 £b8+ 78.£h6+ ¢g8 50.¥e4 £a1 45. An unconvincing example is .£e6+ 53. Kh5 Qd1+ 58.£d5 54.. 6.Ndxe4? Rxd1 32.¥f3 41.¥e3 10.¢d2 £h2+ 66.¢d2 £c7 83.b6 might be better played immediately.Rb4.£e8+ ¢g7 74. 51. £d6 63.¥g2 g6 5.Kg4 Qg1+ 57. £f6+ 69..a5 fxg3 40.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦c1 White is setting up threats of Nb5 and Nd5..¢h3 £f7 57.0-0 ¦b8 This prepares a break with b7-b5.My 160 Memorable Games 60 ¤e7 36. which had to be delayed because of pressure on the long diagonal.£e4 g2 43.¢f3 £g6 61. 48.Qxd4+ Qxd4+ 69.¢c2 ¢d8 82.cxb5 B20 Spassky.h3 Here Black has a wide range of options.cxd4+ 68.h3 ¦fc8 15.¤d6 £a4 36.¤bc3 d6 4.Qxg6 is also stalemate.Kc7 Qxd4= £g6+ 56.¢f2 ¢e6 63. ¢h8 54.a6 £f4 41.£f6+ ¢g8 53. But this game does not flow into his welltraveled territory.¦ce2 ¦e3 45.a6 ¦f7 53.¦g2 £c3 42. 21..b6 is a more convincing defence.Kxd4 and White wins.¢d2 £b6 72.£e5+ ¢g8 73.¥g2 a6 10. Spassky now counts on the pressure on the long diagonal and his active pieces.¤xb5 ¥xb5 40..£b5 £c7 79.¤b5 d6 6.Kg6 Qg4+ 59.¦xc2 ¢g6 59.a4 f4 Black is busted.£g5 ¢h8 71. 17.f5 Ne5 would provide Black with a useful outpost.£c2+ £xc2 58. £a7 The idea is to prepare to establish a battery on the long diagonal with Bc6 and Qb7.¦c2 £xe5 44.¥f3 ¥c6 22.. ¥e8 16. this is a good place for the queen.£a2 ¦e7 55.. ¥xc5 30.Kg4 Qd7+ 54.¢f3 g6 65.¦b2 £a3 This is better than 37. setting up a hedgehog.¢g4 £g6+ 59.¢h2 A useful waiting move in a position in which no immediate action is useful.Kg2 and White will win. ¦b8 Black aims for early queenside play.. . Ra8 also comes into consideration.d4 Qf1+ 56.

d4 cxd4 13.Boris Vasily Belgrade 1992 1.axb4 ¦xb4 16.¢xg2 ¤c7 19.¦fe1 ¢g7 16. The idea is to attack the base of the pawn chain with Bb1.¥xf5 gxf5 42.¤e4 ¥e7 11. 47.¥e4 Fischer decides to continue the battle. ¢d7 44. 53. 15.¤a5 White's plan is simple.Nxe6 fxe6 12..¦xa7 ¦xb2 17.¢f4 ¥d2+ 68.a6 ¢e2 55.¤d8 The final finesse in the long game. exd5 is slightly better for White.¤xa7 d3 56. If the knight is attacked with b5-b4 then it can transfer to the kingside. g6 14.¤e4 ¥c1 38. K e 2 ¥f4 The weakness of the g-pawn now provides Black with the necessary target.a5 ¢xd3 54.¥g2 ¥e7 8.h4 hxg5 27.¦e4 Fischer prepars his beloved march of the h-pawn.Kd5?! 46.e5 This leads to a great simplification of the position.¤xd5 ¢f8 33.a8£ Black has the advantage in this endgame. Now the game comes to a quick and quiet conclusion.¢g4 £g6+ 76. White could have played with a bit more ambition. 49. 14.My 160 Memorable Games 61 presented in Koskela-Gerelma.Robert James Spassky.Bd2 64.Nxa7 Kb4 gets rid of the pesky a-pawn. 9.¢e5 £g5+ 78. Even without queens. 29. Rxf4 Rd8 33.. below.¤c3 e6 3. but Spassky tries to create a mating net anyway.g5 ¥d6 22. 7.¢xf7 ¥h8 The only move.Nd5 Bxd5 18..a4 ¥xb2 39. ¥xg2 18.Nf 4! Bg4 10.¢g6 £e6+ 60. ¤e8 The idea is to use the power of the Bg7 to support the invasion of the knight at d4.f3 Be6 11.£d5 ¥f5 14. But Black's resources are up to the defensive task.Bxg6 Bxg5 39.Bxf4 31.¦e4 Fischer is willing to argue that the knights are as strong as the bishops.a3 ¦c8 17. trying to squeeze a full point from the position.0-0 ¦e8 13. Bg2 Nd4 8.Qd2 is consistent with White's opening strategy.¤f4 ¥a2 Spassky wants to hang onto his bishop pair.¢g8 51.¤b3 ¥f6 43. but the rook will be active at b4..exd6 exd6 20.¤xc5 ¥c1 40. The draw is now unavoidable.¢h4 ¥f6+ Spassky helps Fischer toward the objective at f7. Nxg2 30. ¥e5+ 45. threatening to capture at g2 and use the bishop pair to great effect.¢h7 ¥c3 61.¢g1 ½-½ B23 Fischer..¦h4 ¦h8 24.¢f5 £d7+ 71.¤f4 0-0 12.¦he4 h6 Now it is White who must be careful on the kingside.£xd6 ¦xc2+ 24.Be6 9..hxg5 ¦h4 28.Kxg2 Rh8 31.¥g5 White threatens to exchange at f6.¢e6 £g4+ 79.¢h6 ¢c5 48. 22.a3 11. d4 8. 12.¤xc6 14. B x e 4 b 6 4 1 .¢f7 £d7+ 80.¤c6+ ¢c3 51. Fischer does not let him spring it.O-O will leave Black with the difficult task of defending the pawn at e6.e4 c5 2.Ke5 49.¤xd4 b4 On the one nd this entails a weakening of the pawn at a7.exd5 exd5 6. and it is up to Fischer to display strong defensive technique.¤f6+ ¢d8 36. but a sufficient one.axb4 Bxd4 15. ¢xc2 52. Capture the enemy pawn at a7 and then advance the pawn at a2 to the 8th rank..¢f5 £f6+ 75.a5 and White achieves the goal more quickly than in the game.¢f4 £d6+ 70.Bg4 is not so good here: 7. £e7+ 62. where Black is setting up a c o u n t e r a t t a c k .Nxd5 and the knights round up all the critical dark squares. Rh4 and now White stands better. ¤e7 23. b5 11. ¤f6 6.h3 £xd5 18.¥xb7 36.h3 and White has the better game. In the present match Fischer seems to have evidenced a disrespect for the common wisdom that bishops are stronger than knights..¢f1 ¦e8 34.g4 ¥e6 20.Bf2 Rxb2 ¥xc6 15. 29.Nxa7 Kf3 51. another hypermodern idea.£h5 White has harmoniously developed his forces and Spassky must now be careful.¦xc2 £xc2+ 25.¢g2 White starts the long trek to the pawn at f7.¢e5 ¥c3+ 69.¢h5 ¢d5 48.¥xf6 ¥xf6 10.¢g4 £g7+ 74.Nc6 Kxf2 52.¢g4 £g6+ 67.¢g3 ¢e6 45. £d5+ 59.¤4d5 ¥xd5 32. 31. but he must have had some improvement in mind. Bxd4 Rxb4 16.. 37.¤a4 ¦a2 21. ¥xg5 41.Ne4 Ke7 41. as any exchange of rooks will provide an easy win.¢g6 £f6+ 63.. 40.¤ef6 ¦cd8 21.. with an easy draw.Bd5 Bf4 and Black will follow with Nd6. 5. a 4 K d 7 4 2 .¦e1 ¤f5 25. and chances are roughly level.d3 Fischer deviates from game 17.f4 Bxf4 65.¢g5 £e7+ 72. 29.¢xf5 £f6+ 66.¢f5 £f6+ 73. 19.¢h7 ¢b4 50..¤ge2 ¤c6 4.Be4 c4! leaves White in an uncomfortable position.¦xe8+ ¢xe8 This endgame is likely to be drawn as a result of the bishops of o p p o s i t e c o l o r s .¥f2 £e4+ 26. Fischer goes after the kingside.¢g6 ½-½ .¤c6 d2 57..g3 d5 Spassky repeats the opening which did not bring him success in game 17.¢f4 ¥d2+ 77. where it can place pressure on White's center from the flank.¤xd5 ¥f8 Spassky has successfully repulsed the initial wave of the attack.. ¤f5 The most sensible decision. 17. confident in the counterplay on the queenside.. 26.¢g6 £g7+ 65. 35.Ne4 N x e 4 4 0 . 30.Nc6+ Kf4 50. especially f6 and c7.Rxf4 b6 would have provided an even endgame.Bxf7 Nd6 38.¢h5 £h8+ 63.Kf4! 46..Bd5 Bf4 37.¦xc7 £xa4 23.Nf4! Bxf4 32.¦xh4 ¤xh4 Black now has a slight advantage.¥b6 £e8 The only move.Qg2+!? 64.a7 d1£ 58.Qxd5?! 15. and increase pressure on the center. 30.

16...h4 b4 13. axb3 31.bxc4 e6 A useful break.¦d1 ¤f6 34.Nd7 will just transpose below after an eventual g4-g5.¦ed1 e5 30.¦d1+ ¢e6 39.. an idea that had already been noticed by theoreticians. aiming directly at the enemy king.Be3 ¤g4 21. 11.¤xd7 £xd7 17.h4 Bb7 b5 11. 23.¤de2 9. ¢h7 15..Qf2 White stands better. 25. a6 9.¢e3 ¢d5 38. though it had not yet been played in an attested game..f5! 25.g5 Technically this is a theoretical new idea.¦c1 There is no avoiding the draw now..£g2 ¦f8 33.b3 b5 The idea here is to limit White's activity on the queenside.h5 e5 20. 12 draws.¥g5 White eliminates Black's most effective defender.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1.Nf4 Qd7 15..Bb7 14. fxe6 26.Bd3 Rc8 15. ¤xd5 17. 12. favored by Nigel Short and other British Grandmasters. ¢d5 Agreed drawn. a4 30. ¥xg5 26. 6.Nc6? Nxd5! bxc4 24.h7 Since Rg8+ followed by a check on the h-file is inevitable. though White would still have had a n i m p r e s s i v e a t t a c k . ¦b8 15.Qxb6 Qxb6 18. 0-0 With players castled on opposite wings the life-or-death struggle begins. 9. 1-0 .Rd7! w i n s f o r W h i t e .g3 g6 5.Nxb6 16. 32.¥xh3 £xh3 12. Qb7 21. £c8 10. The idea of a Keres Attack is to play an early g2-g4-g5. this time a S c h e v e n i n g e n .¦xd7+ ¤xd7 33. This formation makes it hard for Black t o a c h i e v e c o u n t e r p l a y o n t h e c .0-0-0 Black can also launch the kingside attack before castling. 15.¥e3 This is used to steer the game into a specific variation of the Scheveningen. ¥f6 Relatively best.¤b3 a6 Now the queen can make use of the a7-square. seen many times in the games of Mikhail Tal.£d2 ¥e7 8. even if White manages to transfer the knight to c6.f i l e .¥d4 ¦ac8 20.e4 c5 2.Nfd5 Bg7 is about even. Spassky 4.¦g7+ ¢h8 35.¥e3 14.Qb2 can be met by 27.Rfe8 25. White launches a p a w n s t o r m a g a i n s t t h e B l a c k k i n g .Nxd4 9.£xe5 ¦xe5 31.f3 Bd7 10.¦c1 ¤d7 36.g4 This is the basic idea of the English Attack.Qa5 15..b3 Nc5 15.¤bc3 d6 4. since any capture at g6 could prove deadly.Kb1 is the alternative... Black resigned. and forces White's reply.Bxb6 dxe4 19.c4 23.Rxg5 f6 would have provided stiffer resistance.0-0 ¥g7 7.e4 c5 2.Qxb4? Bc6 Intending Rb8. namely.¤a4 ¥b7 Here is the true new idea. White must sacrifice both h-pawns to expose the enemy king to the mating attack.¤e2 ¤f6 3. Black has at the very least achieved equality. but there was some interest in the line in the 1980's.dxe6 25.d4 Finally.¥d3 ¥c8 19. Now Fischer must work for the win.¤b6 This is Fischer's new idea. since no progress can be made.. a real Sicilian! cxd4 8. Score: Fischer 9. £c7 18.¤d5 White plays methodically.¤xd4 e6 Another open Sicilian. 0-0 13.f3 ¥h3 Black has equalized.Qa4 25.¦ac1 £d7 16. with less danger to himself on the kingside..£d4 ¦c6 The weaknesses at c4 and d6 offset each other. 14. but in fact the game steers back into charted territory quickly.Qxd4 b5 12. 23. 10.g6 A typical example of the g6break.f6! would have been a stronger defense.Be3 ought to be at least slightly better for White. 27.¤ge2 d6 4. ½-½ B80 Fischer.. cxd5 Rfe8 27..Bxg5 25. £e7 24.¥g5 The idea is to provoke Black into playing h7-h6.b3 A prophylactic move to eliminate any counterplay..¦xg7 £f6 29.¥xg7 ¢xg7 22. 12.f3 This introduces the English Attack.¤xd4 The kingside fianchetto is not considered dangerous against the Dragon formation..¤d4 ¤f6 This attacks the weak pawn at d5.. 28.Nd7 is also possible.gxh7+ ¢h8 24.Qf5! 28..Qxd4 O-O is the normal line. 14.Nc6 exd5 26.£d2 h6 14.Boris Vasily Fischer.My 160 Memorable Games 62 B20 Spassky.Kb1 Ne5 16...Boris Vasily Belgrade 1992 1.Nc6 and 24. ¤f6 7. e.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.d4 cxd4 5.axb3 ¦fd8 Black tries to play d5. Qxb4 d5 17. which is sort of a delayed Keres Attack.fxe5 dxe5 32.¤c3 ¤c6 3.c5 ¢f7 35. 28.h6 A problem-like solution. 19.Robert James Spassky..¦hg1 £xf3 Otherwise Wh ite will play his queen to g2 with an overpowering attack. Now Fischer quickly builds his attack.¦fe1 ¦fe8 27. 24.¦g8+ ¢xh7 34.f4 20.¥xd4 11.¦g3 White wants to double rooks on the g-file. ¥g4 8..¥e3 ¥e6 Spassky could have reached a similar position some time ago.exd5 ¤e5 18. and get something going.¥g2 ¤c6 6. and clearly better than the alternatives.¦xg5 £f6 26.¢b1 White has the superior position because of a spatial advantage and prospects for a kingside attack. a delayed Keres Attack. and the game is now dead even..¢f2 ¢e6 37.Rfd1 Kh7 and now Nxd5 is t h r e a t e n e d .g. 21. ¤xd4 10. 29. ¤d7 13.¦dg1 a5 22. 11.c3 is a reasonable alternative.

Ke7 38. but inviting g4.fxg4 17.e4 ¥g7 Fischer plays a Benoni-style King's Indian.c4 c5 3. The bishop has little future in this pawn formation.Bxg5 was the last chance. a position from a n o l d e r g a m e . c4 15.Be6 N d 8 5 0 ...g5 immediately would have been more accurate.¦d2 This is a new idea. fxe5 Rad1 c4 17. leading to the elimination of the powerful bishop. the knight should have gone to d7.¤g1 ¥g4 Rxd8+ Rxd8 Rxd8+ Kxd8 Nce2 Ke7 19. confident that Black's formation is not a solid one.My 160 Memorable Games 63 E90 Spassky. 6. Now Spassky steers straight for the thematic sacrifice of the knight at f5. ¥b2 36. or work on the queenside via b6.¥xb1 The elimination of the heavy pieces favors White. by transposition. but the pawn can go there instead. e6 11.d4 exd4 7.¢b3 The king has accomplished its task of eliminating Black's pawn and now returns home to safety. 11.Bxf5 and the h-pawn falls.¤h1 The knight would have been better stationed at e2.g4 White's goal is to increase the activity of his bishop pair and take control of all the important dark squares. covering the d4 square and depriving Black of the outpost there. but we think that Black could have occupied that key square immediately with a good game.g5 ¤f7 19. ¤g6 13. 0-0 7.£xf3 The exchange of bishop for knight is a common theme in this variation.Bg5. and here he is suffocating. Spassky now increases the pressure slowly and surely.Boris Vasily Fischer. Fischer is a player who requires active piece play.¦b1 £b8 33.f4 ¤f7 The e6-squar e looks weak.¢a5 ¢d7 44. ¤c7 18. 18.Nxf5 gxf5 38.¤d5 ¥d6 16.f5.£xb1 £xb1 35. and it is also convincing.¥f6 ¤c7 57. in particular e5 and f6. ¢c7 55. but even here White would win with accurateplay.¦xe1 £b8 The threat is to capture on c4 and infiltrate on b2.¥b5 a6 4.¢b5 ¤c7+ 53.¤bc3 ¤e7 This takes control of the important d5 square.Bg3 makes more sense.¥d2 ¤e5 14..0-0 exd5 12. which would have forked the bishop and queen.¤g3 ¦xb1 34.¢d1 ¢e7 39.¥f4 0-0-0 12. and the two knights can be used effectively. There are two alternatives which come to mind.¤f3 ¤c6 3.h4 a6 22.¢b6 intending Kb7.Nxf5+ gxf5 39.¢c2 ¥d4 40. ¤h6 It is not easy to give a recommendation for Black here..e4 e5 2.exd5 We would reach.¥d3 ¦b8 21..¦xd1 ¥d7 10. bxc4 28.¥d7 ¤d8 47.¥xg6 hxg6 58. Bxf5 Kg8 39.¥e8 ¢c8 56. but otherwise disaster could strike quickly. The point is that by delaying e7-e6.¥c3 ¤a8+ Black's knights are utterly useless. while Black's potential queenside counterplay has been neutralized by this move. ¢c8 45. and the knight can be developed later at g6.¦b1 ¦e8 20.¢g2 17.bxc4 ¤e8 29. and the pawn structure will be good for White ¥g4 This is a well-known maneuver to fight for the e5 square. Black will allow his opponent to recapture at d5 with the e-pawn.. 37.¥e2 f5 Fischer employed an analogous idea in his game against Korchnoi from the Sousse Interzonal.¦be1 ¦xe1 25.¥xe5 14. Spassky chooses another path.h5 ¦e7 30.¢e1 . 16. 37. but Spassky deprives Fischer of any such play with his next move. ¥h8 31.Re8 13.O-O Ne8 and f7-f5 will give Black a n e x c e l l e n t p o s i t i o n . the g a m e r e t u r n s t o w e l l .Robert James Belgrade 1992 1. Now perhaps the most efficient path to victory is the one which both Deep Thought and our analytical team prefer. 15. ¦b7 Fischer's play on the b-file will be futile.0-0 f6 6. ¤h8 An ugly move. B g 8 49. 16. Fischer has shown a preference f o r k n i g h t s i n t h i s m a t c h .h3 ¥xf3 9.¦ad1 ¥e6 This position is even. 48.¥xc6 dxc6 5.¥xd8 1-0 C69 Fischer. each of which may help justify Fischer's play in the opening. 48.¢a5 ¢b7 52.¢a4 ¤c7 43.e5 8.¥d3 This is a more reliable move than 6. 8. but Fischer manages to redeploy his knights and keep the balance. ¥h4 42. After a brief spell in a transpositional Twilight Zone.. Still.¤c3 g6 5. 1967..¥c2 ¤f7 46..¥d2 ¦b7 32.h6 White continues to press against Black's pieces.b3 prevents the knight from entering at c4. 26.g5 was hardly the correct plan.£d1 White avoids Ne5.¢f1 ¥c5 Black's active bishops give him the advantage..¥c1 £d8 27. Fischer intends to create pressure on the d-file. 38. But the standard plan with 12.k n o w n c h a n n e l s . hxg4 g5!? undermines White's pressure at e5. from which it could retreat to f8 later if needed.d5 d6 4..¤e2 The knight is being transfered to an attacking post at g3.¢e2 37.. namely the immediate sacrifice at f5. 24.Boris Vasily Belgrade 1992 1.¢b3 ¥f2 41. since Black's remaining forces have no scope. 7.¤xd4 c5 8. 17.¢f3 ¢f8 White has achieved a winning position.Bd2 a6 14.¤f3 Spassky plays conservatively.¢a4 ¤a8 54. ¤e8 12.Bc8 and the a-pawn falls. ¤bd7 10.Robert James Spassky.a4 Re7 13.b3 White's general plan is to advance his hpawn.¢xa6 ¤c7+ 50.¤e2 £xd1 9.¢b6 ¤a8+ 51.d4 ¤f6 2.¥g3 ¤e5 14.¥a4 ¢b8 47.£c2 b5 23.Nf7 49. The idea is to take control of e4 and stop f2-f4. but it is not easy to take advantage of this.

Bxf8 Qxf8 20.d5 N d 4 1 2 . 13.Bf6 is a solid defense.¤ge2 a6 8.Qd2 Ng8 and Black will play Bh6. by doubling rooks a few moves from now. 11.¦f2 Spassky avoi ds the repetition of moves. ¥xb2 21.¥g4 ¥d7 35.Kxf3 h4 hxg4 Nf5 24. hxg4 19. Bxd4 Nc5! 17.¤c1 ¤d7 Fischer decides to innovate.£e1 ¦h7 Fischer pressures the hpawn.h4 h5 9. Nxg4 41. adding t o t h e p r e s s u r e a t d 4 . it can already be said that Black has a better game. gh Black is already gaining the upper hand because White's king is stuck in the center and the pawn at e4 is becoming a liability. tries to play sharply but this is a premature break.Qc2 Ng3 21.£xb3 12.¥e3 ¤c6 7.¥e3 ¤c6 7. so White must attack on the kingside. but Fischer calculated that he could afford to grab the pawn at b2. 16.Rhf1 Be8 and White would have to worry about the dangling h.Boris Vasily Fischer. Rg1+ Kh8 24.f3 0-0 6.¥d1 ¥e8 ½-½ E83 Spassky.Qg5 f6 22. So a draw was agreed.£d1 a5 This preserves the knight's outpost at c5.g4 is more active.hxg6 fxg6 20.Qxa1 f6 23. in a desperate situation in the match. .. 22. it is hard to find anything convincing for White.¥e2 b6 This prepares the important advance of the c-pawn to c5. 11. it succeeded.Bd3 White will win. b5 would be a target.¥g4 ¥d7 28..¤c3 ¥g7 4.£g3 ¦f8 25.¦f6 ¦fh8 The advance of the hpawn is no longer possible.¦f1 ¥d7 23.h5 cxd4 16.a4 A wise choice.Qxg6 Nxh1 22.¤f3 g6 Nf1 g5!? This is an attempt to rattle White's position and create some targets for the bishops. 21. He attacks the pawn at f5 and ties down White's pieces. Still. g4+ would have been too risky: Kg5 Ng7 Kf6 Ne8+? Kf7 Nc7 Be7 followed by Bg5 and Black is better.a3 b5! 33.¥d1 ¥e8 31. ¥e8 27. gxf5 19.O-O Here White would have had a very good game.b3 26.Bh6 Bh8 19. but Black's defense is easier here because his pieces are better coordinated. 10.Rd1 Bb7 15. 18. Eventually.d4 ¤f6 2. c5 14. hxg4 14.¢f1 £d7 An important component of Black's defense. Ndf1 a5 Ke2 Be6 Ng3 Kg6 23.Boris Vasily Fischer. as if White plays with too much ambition he can find himself in a difficult position.c3 Kf6 h3 ¥h5 Ng3 24. using a less direct method of placing pressure at d4.¥xh6 ¢xh6 15.g5 ¤c5 21. 32. In game 20..¤c3 ¥g7 4. Bd7 hxg5 Kxg5 Nh4 ¥g4 Now Black has to play carefully in order to maintain the balance. Now the game is even. 11.Nxb4 axb4 19. but Spassky presses on. 18.Qd2 e5! 18.¦dg1 ¦h8 18. Nc1 e5 12.axb3 Kh7! 13.cxb5 cxb5 34. 10.gxf5 ¥xd5 20.f3 0-0 6. solving his major problem in this opening. Rxh8+ ¥b7 17.¤ge2 a6 8. e. c6 32. Bf7 21. He threatens to advance the pawn and drive away the knight at b3.fxg4 c5 15.Nf3+ Bxf3 42.¢e2 Bg6 N3d2! With this move Fischer completes his defensive program.¤b3 This seems logical.0-0-0 ¢g7 16.¢b1 £e7 17. .Robert James Belgrade 1992 1. ¤c5 17. 22. ½-½ E83 Spassky.Rg6 and White has serious threats.exd5 Now 20.Bxg7 Kxg7 and in this unclear position B l a c k h a s g o o d c h a n c e s . even if it were d e s i r a b l e .h6 Be5 17. preventing it from entering.¢a2 £e7 34.Rb2 Qa7! with a slight advantage for Black.¤b3 ¤xb3 12. ¢h7 13.¥d1 ¥e8 29. a5 This is another component of Fischer's new plan. thus indirectly undermining the support of the d4-square.pawn. but only because the center was closed.a4 A direct reply.Ke2 would also have been equal.b4 axb4 35.axb4 Na6 36..c4 g6 3.e4 d6 5.¥e2 ¥h6 14. he will move the knight from c6 and play c7-c5. but objectively Fischer has nothing to worry about.Robert James Belgrade 1992 1.d5 Nd4 13. but as we will see it turns out to be a dubious idea.g4 Spassky.¤f5 This may have some psychological effect. But it allows White to establish strong outposts on the weakened light squares.g. 13.a4 f 3 g x f 3 K x f 3 ¥f8 This prevents the White knight from reaching e7 and d6.Nb3 ¤b4 12.hxg6 exd4?? 21.d5 ¤d4 Fischer does not repeat his mistake from game 12.Nxe4? 18.c4 g6 3.¤d5 This is an empty gesture which only weakens the pawn at e4. but 38.e4 d6 5. but it weakens b4 and allows Black to establish a strong outpost there.Bxa1 22.¤e3 Kh5 Nf5 ¥c5 The bishop at c5 dominates the knight at f5.¥g4 ¥d7 30.Qd2 e5 11. 25. 24. The knight should have retreated to c1.a3 Bf7 Ngf5 6 Kf3 Bd7 Kg3 Be6 h4! Fischer loses patience.g4 Spassky tries the same attacking method as in game 8. even though that would amount to a waste of time. Still. Positionally.h4 h5 9. but objectively the game is completely even.d4 ¤f6 2. N b 3 w o u l d h a v e b e e n s t r o n g e r . 17.Qd2! was correct. h5Ne3 c6 Kf3 Bf7 The exchange of dark-squared bishop for knight would bring Black nothing.My 160 Memorable Games 64 b5 20.Bf3 The idea is to pave the way for the queen to get to e2. 26. which is very important in this formation. £d8 33.fxg4 ¤d7 20...¤xd4 A mistake.¤c1 e5 10.

Final Score: Fischer 10.¦g6 ¦xg6 27.¤c3 d6 5.Boris Vasily Beograd m 1992 1.£d1 ¥xf4 19.d4 ¤f6 2.¢e2 ¥e6 33.¢f1 h4 33.cxd4 0-0 10.¤b3 ¤d7 21.¥e3 ¥b7 12.¥g5 f6 39.¢e4 ¤c3+ 47.¦dc2 ¦c7 37. ¦g8 26.¦g1+ 2 3 .¥e4 ¥xa2 25.¤f1 g5 27.g3 d5 5.¤d6 ¥c3 33.e4 c5 2.¥f8 ¦e8 40.¤xc8 ¦xc8 36.dxe4 e5 26.¤g3 ¥f7 25.¤xd4 c5 8.¢f7 ¦a2 55.¤c4 ¦b7 ½-½ B23 Fischer.¤e3 c6 30.My 160 Memorable Games 65 22.Bg4! and if 23.b3 ¦ab8 20.¢f1 ¦d5 28.exf5 ¥xf5 17.¦e1 ¦f8 38.¢d5 ¦f3 52.¦ac1 ¦fc8 18.¤d5 ¥xd5 26..£xb7 ¤xc2 22.¤h4 ¥g4 41.g3 ¤e5 23.¢c6 ¦xh3 51. and the match comes to an end.¥d3 a6 10.hxg5 ¢xg5 40.¤a5 ¦bc7 45.¥xc6 bxc6 5.a3 £c7 9.Cathy Fischer.b5 ¦b1 45. 15 draws.¥g1 ¦ab8 13.¦e1 f6 7.h4 ¥d7 39.dxc5 £a5 8.Boris Vasily Beograd m 1992 1.¤g3 ¢g6 34.¢h1 0-0 11.¤e4 ¦b5 25.¤a5 ¥d7 19.¢g1 ¥d7 42.¦ed1 ¢e8 24.¤c3 ¦bb8 32.¥xb7 ¤b4 24.hxg6 ¢g7 Spassky resigned the game.¥g3 ¤c5 17.£f2 £xf2 34.h3 c5 7.¤d5 ¤f6 8.g4 ¦e8 18..Kh7? would have been dangerous for Black.¤df1 a5 32.¥e3 £h4 32.¥f1 h5 24.£f3 Spassky.¤ef4 ¤xd5 9.¤d2 ¤h5 18.h3 h5 26.¢e2 ¥e6 30. 23.¥d2 ¥d5 26.¥c5 ¢f7 32.exd5 ¤c4 27.¤ge2 e6 4.g3 ¤c6 5.b4 ¤f5 23.¥f4 0-0-0 12. Q x a 1 Q x f 5 + ¢h8 23.d4 exd4 7.Boris Vasily Beograd m 1992 1.¤b2 ¥g7 23.¥b5 a6 4.¦g8+ ¢h7 54.0-0 d6 7.£d2 f3 22.¢e2 ¥g6 28.¤e2 ¤f6 3.¥b4 ¦d7 31.¥xc6 dxc6 5.¦a2 ¤e7 21.¢d4 ¤xb5+ 48.Robert James Spassky.¦xa7 ¤d5 39.¥e3 £xa4 15.¦d8 ¤d5 43.¤d3 ¦b5 29.¤xd5 ¥d6 10.exd5 exd5 6.0-0 0-0 11.¤ce2 ¢e7 21.¤d4 g6 22.¦ad1 ¦ad8 25.¦b8 ¦b3 46.c3 ¤h6 8.¤c3 ¥g8 40.Robert James Beograd m 1992 1.¢e1 b5 22.£d2 ¦fc8 18.¢c4 ¦c3+ 49.¤c4 £a6 14.¤g1 ¥g4 18.¦g7+ ¢h6 56.¤e2 exf4 27.d4 cxd4 9.¥d6 ¦e6 41.¥c5 ¦e1 38.¥g2 d4 7.c3 ¢f6 23.¢f3 ¢g6 34.¢e2 g5 33.¦d7 ¤b6 42.e4 0-0 6.¥h6+ ¢e8 38.¤f4 ¥f5 13.f3 ¦b8 39.£d3 ¤xb2 0-1 B31 Fischer.¤f3 ¤c6 3.h3 ¥a8 14.¤gf5 ¥e6 36.¤c3 ¢f8 21.Robert James Spassky.¦e1 ¤bd7 13.¦d6 ¥c6 43.¢g3 ¥e6 38.¦xc5 ¤b6 28.f3 gxf3 44.£b1 The f-pawn is once again p r o t e c t e d .e4 e5 2..d3 a6 8.¢f7 1-0 A48 Forbes.¤bc3 e6 4.¥xd4 ¦e7+ 36.¦a7 ¢f8 37.0-0 ¥b7 12.¤d2 ¤f7 13.¦xd8+ ¦xd8 19.¥d2 £xc5 9.Robert James Spassky.¢xf3 ¥f8 45..¥xf4 ¥e6 20.¦ec1 ¦bc8 43.¥b5 g6 4.¤xg4 hxg4 42.¥g2 ¥e7 6.¤e3 ¢h5 46.e4 c5 2.g4 b4 15.¦a5 ¦e7 30.¦c1 £xb7 23.¢f1 ¥c5 17.¥f8 ¦a7+ 57.¢xb5 ¦xd3 50.¤c4 ¦b7 44.¤c4 £xg5 31.¤f5 a4 43.¤bc3 ¤e7 11.f4 b5 10.¦xf2 ¦bb8 35.¤e2 £xd1 9. Spassky 5.¦d2 a6 27.g5 ¥f8 20.e4 c5 2.¢e2 ¥f6 34.£e2 e6 15.¢f1 f6 29.£xe1 £d7 17.¥f4 e5 16.a4 b6 11.¤xa4 f5 16.¤c4 d5 24.0-0 ¥g7 6.d3 ¥e6 12.0-0 f6 6.¤xe5 £xe5 30.¤f3 g6 26.Robert James Beograd blitz B24 1992 1.¦ad1 c4 16.¦e1 ¦xe1+ 16.¥f1 1-0 C69 Fischer.f6+ Kh8 25.¤a4 ¤d7 17. 0-1 ¤b4 21.b4 ¦e1 44.¤e4 ¥d5 35.¥e3 £c7 14.¢d3 ¥g7 36.¥xf6 ¥xf6 40.¤e2 ¥f7 41.b3 a5 19.¢f3 ¥d7 37.axb4 cxb4 16.¥xd5 ¤xd5 27.¥d2 ¥f6 42.¢f3 ¥f7 31.h3 ¥h5 24.¤f5 ¥c5 ½-½ .¢xf6 ¦a6+ 58. 24.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦xd1 ¥d7 10.¦cd1 ¦b5 29.¤3d2 h5 29.¥h2 ¤f4 19.¦xd8+ ¢xd8 20.¦xf6 ¥c6 41.¢e4 h5 35.¢f3 h4 37.¥f4 ¥g7 4.¤c3 d6 11.¤xf4 ¤e5 28.¦c1 ¢d7 31.h3 ¦b8 14.¤f3 g6 3.£b1 ¥xa1 Now the rook can be safely captured.a3 ¥f7 35.£xa1+ f6 25.¤c3 ¤c6 3.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦d2 ¤e5 14.£a4 £b6 12.¤xa5 dxe4 25.¥xf4 exf4 20.¥xe5 fxe5 15.a3 ¤h6 22.¢e6 ¦xf2 53.¥d2 ¦e8 15.Bh6! 24. Bg7 then 24.¥g3 ¤g6 13.

¦hf1 h6 15.¤f1 ¥e7 28.e5?! Nfd7 9. b6 10.¤ge2 9. though dulled somewhat by Spassky's choice of continuations. 6.f4 f6! 10.cxb5 axb5 13.¥c2 ¦e8 13.Nf5 Bf6! 43. dxc5 7.¥h3 This connects the rooks and prepares f4-f5.£c1 ¥f8 26.¤c3 ¥b7 14.b4 a5! prevents the planned advance of White's a-pawn to a5. but White could have played more strongly by exchanging light-squared bishops.O-O-O Nd4= was agreed drawn in Marovic-Ivkov.£e5 1-0 E80 Spassky.£xa7 f4 Well-timed! 38..Robert James Sveti Stefan m 1992 1.£d2 ¦f8 22.g4 White prepares to play Ng3 and f5.c3 d6 9.¦a7 g6 36.a4 c5 18.¤d4 The b5-pawn is unprotected. 13.d4 ¤f6 2. 50.¥d2 ¥g7 17.g4 ¥d3 43.¤e5 ¦ae8 24.¥b5 a6 4.£d4+ ¢e6 42. ¤xe4 30.¤h4 Another strong move which is not obvious.¤b1 This threatens to liquidate a lot of pieces following captures on a5 and a8. £e1+ 45.¤1d2 28.d4 ¤bd7 11.¦d6 ¢c5 41. O-O.¦e6 ¢d5 44.¥e3 h5 21.Qd4+ K e 6 4 1 .¤g3 .d5 would lead to an ultra-sharp Modern Benoni. hxg4 37.¥xe7 £xe7 19.c4 g6 3.gxf3 f5 15.Rg1 Ke7 15. Malaga 1981..¥xf4 Fischer's superb technique is evident as he returns his trophy immediately.¤c3 ¥g7 The King's Indian.¤xf7 ¦xe1+ 26. But then Spassky is also the master of the Black side of the Spanish Game! a6 4. w h i c h l e a d t o a n e a r l y e n d g a m e .e5 ¥b7 16..¦xa7 ¦a8 36.¤g3 g6 15. ¢g7 29.bxc3 Bb7 12. caused by the potential problems on the a-file. B d 8 B x d 8 4 3 .¦ea1 £d7 24.g4! fxe5 18.£xd8+ ¢xd8 8.0-0 ¥e7 6. intending to advance the f-pawn.Boris Vasily Sveti Stefan m 1992 1.Nf8! 41. Bg2 Bxg2 16.exf6 Nxf6 16. This is better than exchanging at a8.Bb6?! Qa8! 40.O-O-O b6 10.Qa8 would lead to an easy win for White.. 39.exd6 £f6 20. but the idea of a delayed b4 after Black has advanced to c4. 23.. exf4 40.¢d2 ¢b5 40.¦e6 ½-½ C95 Fischer. The knight retreat was called for.¦1a2 ¦fc8 25.e5 Bxf3 14.¥h4 c5 17.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦a5 ¤d5 33.gxf5 43.¢g2 ¥d5+ 46. c5 Normal is 5.¥xe4 f5 31.¥g5 h6 16.¦b6 ¢c5 45.Nf3 Ke8 13.¤xb5 ¤f8 49.¥xf7+ ¦xf7 25. ¤fd7 9.¥a4 ¤f6 5. ¤a6 11. even if this entails exposing his king to some danger..¥c2 ¥xd5 32. but the early hypermodern advance is also seen.£xg5 hxg5 29. f4 Bxc3 11. ¤df6 Black lack s adequate counterply.. rather than face. ¥f8 42.0-0 ¥e7 6.¥e3 8.¤c4 ¤xc4 22.¥b3 d6 8. 41.g3 ¤c7 12.¤bxd6 ¤e6 Spassky resigned here. Q g 7 N f 8 a n d B l a c k c a n h o l d o n .d5 c4 19.axb4 cxb4 32.c3 0-0 9. ¥f8 14.¦a3 Spassky mu st have been feeling a creeping uneasiness.e5!? Bb7 14.e4 e5 2.b3 ¢e6 30. developing his knight on the flank.¦a7 ¢f6 34. but Spassky prefers the accepted l i n e .¦a6 ¤f2 42. since there is no real hope of playing f7-f5.£xf4 ¢d7 44.f3 The sharp Saemisc h variation. after which Nb1-a3 will win the weak pawn at b5.Bd2 Re8+ 12. ¦ad8 17.g3 ¤xh3 39. If he had tried to hang on to it.¥g5 b4 15..¤bd2 ¥b7 12. where White's heavy artillery will congregate. Therefore he tries to regroup his pieces to prevent a capture at b5.f3 ¥c8 34.¥xc4 ¤b6 23. The natural path would lead White astray: 40.¥a4 ¤f6 5...Nxf3 Q x f 3 4 2 . ¥f7 The fatal err or.¤bd2 The knight has done its duty on the queenside and returns to provide support for the center and for its fellow steed at f3.f5! and White has a strong attack. and also prepares to sacrifice a piece for the dominating central pawns.e4 d6 5. Rxg2 f6 17.c4 c6 12.hxg4 ¦xa7 38.N3d2 is an interesting alternative.¢f2 ¥f5 35. ¦xa7 35. 40.£xe1 ¢xf7 27.¦e1 b5 7.0-0-0 Now Fischer introduces a completely new plan.¤f1 13.h3 ¤b8 10. Qd7 Bxf3 41.¥b3 0-0 8.£a1 £e8 27.¤b1 h6 16. Q x d 8 + i s u n c l e a r .f5 gave White an advantage in SpasskyGheorghiu.¥b5 Quite brave of Spassky.Bxf5++ 43.axb5 axb5 33.Be2 Nc6 13.Qd4+ Ke6 42.¥e4 ¥xe4+ 47. victory would have been less likely.dxc5 6. Spassky makes one more attempt at counterplay. It is not just the move that is new.¢e1 ¤f4 38.h3 ¤b8 The Breyer System.¦a6+ ¢c5 37. as the resulting simplification would not help White's attack. another Fischer favorite.b4 This is an . 4. Qxf4 Be5 and Black could still put up a fight. Spassky's pride and joy. 13. ¢e7 14.Robert James Spassky. ¤h7 20. and perhaps a strong one.¤f3 ¤c6 3.dxe5 ¤xe4 18.f4 e6 The Black knights look very artificial.g4 Fischer strives to open the position. So Black must try a desperate sacrifice.£e3 £g5 28.¤bd2 ¤xd6 21. to test Fischer in the latter's favorite opening. 39.a3 ¢d6 31.Boris Vasily Beograd m 2560 1992 1.¤f3 ¤c6 3.Robert James Spassky.¤f5 There is the threat of a big fork at g7.My 160 Memorable Games 66 C95 Fischer.d4 ¤bd7 11.exf6 exf6 11.e4 e5 2.¦e1 b5 7.¤xe4 ¥e7 48. 10.

¦e4 ¥xh2 29.¤g3 g6 15. is more common here..b5) is riskier because the pawn chain can be undermined by a2-a4.Bxc4 Rxc4 52. because a piece must be sacrificed to stop the pawn..Rg7 h3 39.¤f1 ¥f8 14.. since Black can now both consolidate his position and win the important pawn at h2.Robert James Sveti Stefan m 1992 1.d4.¦ac1 ¥e7 12.¢f3 ¦g8 34. but in fact it is hard to achieve much.b3 d5 This classical central thrust gives Black an active game. Q x d 4 N c 5 ¤e5 20.£d2 21.hxg5 hxg5 35.¦xd2 We have reached a position where Black should hold the advantage thanks to his bishop pair.¤c3 ¥b7 12. the light squares will be very weak. Kxb6 Rxa4 53.¤d5 ¦c6 39.¤f3 3.¢f1 A very lame move.a4 bxa4 .¦e1 b5 7. Bc5 a4 56.Rxa7 Rh8 38. 37. 34.¦g1 This lets Fischer escape. 21.¢d6 ¤d2 49..¤xf6 ¢xf6 25. targeting the weak pawn at d6.¥xe5 ¦xe5 26. but even after the text the position is still a win.Bxc5 8.Kg6.¢e4 ¢xh7 39.Kb4 Kf5 and the Black king will march to d3.Boris Vasily Sveti Stefan m 1992 1.Be6.¦xd1 ¥xc5 9.¥a7 ¦xb3 47.. with the bishop guarding d6 from f8.¥b2 b6 The cautious approach.. ¢g6+ 38.¥xh2 ¦e8+ 40. Try playing on against Gambit if you need proof.Bxe5 Rxe5 27..¦f1 exf5 26.Bd2 Rd8 29.¥g4 This is wrong. The idea is to create more scope for the darksquared bishop.¥xb6 ¦a1 53. Qxa2 Qg5 In this complicated position both sides h a v e c h a n c e s . ¥xe4 20. It is hardly a new idea.¥d5 ¦xa4 52.. a 4 a r e t h e m o r e c o m m o n m o v e s .f4 Rxe4 23.. Alternatives promised excellent drawing chances.¤d5 ¦c6 37.¥a4 ¤f6 5. The Queen's Gambit Accepted is an unusual choice from Fischer.¦d7 ¥e5 32.¥xc5 a4 54.Nxc4 51.Bxe5 g i v e s W h i t e m o r e c h a n c e s t o e s c a p e . but Fischer defends well. £xd1 7.¥d6 ¦e4 43.¤xd4 1 9 .¢f6 ¤d4 Fischer has achieved a technically winning position.e4 e5 2.. 40.¥xc4 ¦xc4 52. though few commentators noticed it at the time..My 160 Memorable Games 67 f6 18. 16..c4 dxc4 Perhaps influenced by the renewed interest in the opening in the 1980s.Rad1 f5 25.dxc5 Spassky shows a definite preference for endgames in this match! 7.¤e3 ¢f7 32.a2 57.¤d3 ¥g7 Black could have tried for a little more with 35. however.Bf4! Bxf4 35.Na4 Be7 14.Robert James Spassky.. 29. ¥d6 28.¥f4 This is the most logical reaction..¤5b4 ¦c7 38. Bxe6 Kxe6 37.c3 0-0 9. ¤bd7 10.Kxc5 Kg6 54.h3 ¤b8 10.Kd3 i s n o b e t t e r . 30. 3.¥g3 ¦c8 24.a4 ¦b2 44.¥xc4 c5 6.Bxh2 Kg6+ 38. since the c-pawn is preserved. ¤f6 4.Ke4 Kxh7 39.¥g5 h6 16.¢e2 h5 This modest pawn will reach the seventh rank in a few moves and dramatically grow in stature. Black's position is solid however. [ 50. Qxd4 Rxc2 f5 25. 11. 22. for example Be7 28.Bxf5 gxf5 30. 16.Kf2 Ke7 17.Bxf6 Nxf6 15.¦xf5+ ¢g7 27.Kb5 Ra2 55.Kxd1 Rd8+ 24. The extended fianchetto (10.¤ce4 fxe5 19.¦d1 ¤xc2 28. Ng3!? Rxd1+ 23.¤xe4 gxf5 21. at Curacao 1962.Ke2 gives White a dangerous initiative.gxf5 ¤f6 22. 36.a3 with the idea of playing b4.b3 b6 11.b3 9.b3 h4 33.¢e5 ¤f3+ 48.¥d2 exd4 Spassky deviates from the first game of the match.¥d6 Agreed drawn. 50. Nc5 Bxc5 26.¤xc4 51.Qe2 and 7 . Rg6+! Ke7 40. 17.¢b4 ¢f5 ] 51.¢d7 ¦d1 56.. a3 55. ½-½ C95 Fischer..0-0 ¥e7 6.Nxb6 13.Bc3.¥b8 a5 46. After capturing on e6..Nxa2 29.¤g3 ¦xe2 27.. Bb2 Bb7 12.¦xe5 This is natural.c6 ¦xd5+ 59.Nxb3 was more logical.¢xb6 ¦xa4 53.¤d4 ¦c8 14. ¦xd1+ 23. but nevertheless questionable..¦h7 h2 36. cxd4 This second exchange brings Spassky good fortune.¢c6 ¤b3 This throws away the win.¥b5 a6 4.¥c2 ¦e8 13.¤xe4 ¤d5 23.¤5b4 ¦c7 ½-½ D27 Spassky.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦e7+ ¢f6 31.Bxa2! Rxa2 58.¥b4 Now the winning chances are gone.¤gxe2 ¤b4 28.Rg1= h3 35. ¦c7 31.¢xc5 ¢g6 54.Be2 Nbd7= 8.Ke2 intending 30.¤f4 g5 34.¢f5 Intending to tether Black's king to the edge of the board. who usually prefers a more hypermodern treatment of 1. too.Bxe5 Rxe5 22. but surprisingly he does not find the resources to crush his opponent.h5 looks good. 42.Nbd2 Ke7 10.¥b3 d6 8. ¤e6 41.f5 White has full compensation for the sacrificed pawn. The idea was used in a game between Tal and Keres. 27.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.c5 ¤d4+ 56.O-O? 13.¤xc2 £xd2 30.¦e2 Perhaps this was an error.cxd4 c5 18.¥c5 a4 56. Black gets active piece play in return for his suspect p a w n s t r u c t u r e .¤bd2 ¥b7 12.¥e2 ¥c5 Black has achieved full equality.Rf2! deserved consideration. 33.¤f3 ¤c6 3.Kxf4 Ne6+ 36.Nxe4 dxe4 dxe4 22.e4 is a po pular alternative which has been the subject of much scrutiny lately.d4 d5 2.¥d7 ¦e2 44.¥e6 ¦b4 50.¥f4 ¦f8 A very strong move..0-0 a6 7.h4 ¥c8 32.¢b5 ¦a2 55.e3 e6 5. White now must part with the exchange because of the threat of 37.f3 b5 15.c6= 57.. 19.Rxe5 Bxd4 28.¥xe5+ 37.. 24.d4 ¤bd7 11.¢xd1 ¥f8 24. 45.¥xa3 ¤c2 58.

Black's light-squared bishop can easily be placed in a position where it has too much work to do.¦g6+ More problems would have followed 47.¦xa4 ¦hb8 14. 3 draws.Rda1 Nb4 secures the defense..¥h6 ¤e1 The pin on the g-pawn is most annoying.Rd5 The computer program Deep Thought II claimed that White would have won here. 37.¤b1 The point of this move is to try to exchange dark squared bishops after Ba3.Nxa3 gxf3 21.¢h2 ¦b2 30. Rxa3 Nfd5 18.. bring a knight to f4 and put a rook on the g-file.Kf2 g4 with at least equality.My 160 Memorable Games 68 18.0-0 ¥e7 6.Ra5 Bb4 16. g4 18. a simple and effective plan..h4 h5 28. Few players seem to enjoy the Black side of these p o s i t i o n s .Bxh5 51.¤c2 ¦b8 28.e4 e5 2.¥xe5 ¦xe3 46.. 18.¢h3 ¤d3 53.a4 It is precisely this move which often discourages the extended fianchetto by Black.¦g5+ ¢h7 46. 10.¦c7+ ¢d8 25.b7 51.¢h2 ¤d3 33.¥g5 ¦b1+ 39..Bd6 might have been more accurate.¦e7+ Instead.¤bd2 ¢e7 12..¢h2 ¦b2 40. 19..fxe4 Rc3+ ¦c3 39.Nxa4 Ba7 maintains equality.¥c7 ¦a2 50.¥b6 ¦a2 55. 38.Rxa4 Nb6!? 13.c3 0-0 9. rather uncharacteristically. 1-0 another plan.Rxc5 Nxc5 17.dxc5 £xd1 8. 17. for example 13.¤bd2 ¦e8 11.¥d6 ¦c8 42.b5 ¤bc5 34. 32. 19.Kf2 Ne5 with good play for Black.¢h3 ¤e4 31. ¢f8 41. ¢e7 17.¢h2 ¤d3 36.¢h3 ¦e2 43.¤f3 ¤c6 3.Na5 Forced Spassky to grovel with the Black pieces against Bronstein at Moscow 1964. ¤bd7 10..¦xc4 ¤c5 22.¥xc4 c5 6..¥a4 ¤f6 5. 24.Rh7 would have won.¦xh5 ¦xg2+ 57.Kf2 was the correct move..d3 Fischer decides to avoid the main lines.Boris Vasily Sveti Stefan m 1992 1992 1.¥a3 ¤e4 An interesting move.¥b4 Spassky's ship steers clear of the final reef and the game heads for home.¥f6+ ¢g8 45.Robert James Sveti Stefan m Fischer. ¦d8 49.Ba3 Bxa3 17. 19...¥b6 ¤d3 51. ¦xd3+ 40. h5 29.O-O is probably playable..¢g1 ¤d3 38.¥c4 ¥xc4 21.¤a3 gxf3 23.h5+ ¢f7 50.¥b5 a6 4. The following exchange leaves the a-pawn weak.b6 This modest pawn decides the outcome of the game.¥b2 b5 Fischer departs from the path of the fourth game. allowing Fischer to develop an interesting counterattack.Robert James Spassky.¢xd3 ¤f6 41.¦g5 Spassky intensifies the pressure with every move. ¥a8 25... The distance between a very good position and a very bad one is very small indeed! ¦hd8 22.gxf3 ¤fd7 24. If Black takes the knight Fischer will escape.e3 e6 5.¥a3 This prevents Fischer from countersacrificing the e x c h a n g e .Nc5 20.¦xg7 ¦xb3 27.¢f4 ¤d3+ 58. ¤a5 Spassky shifts from the Breyer to the Classical Chigorin formation.¥xd6 ¤xd2 26.¢e3 a5 31. 20. Nc4 with tremendous pressure.¤d4 White's domination is complete.¦e6 ¢g7 42.¦a7+ Black resigns.¦f5+ ¢g7 37. f5 23.f3 ¤f2+ 32. Spassky played quite well.Nbd2 b5 10.. g5 Black intends to advance the g-pawn.. 40.¢e3 ¤e5 59. The worst game by Fischer in the first half of the match.¦g5+ ¢h7 43.¦xh5+ ¢g6 45.Boris Vasily Fischer.¦xa6 ¦xa6 19.¥c7 ¦c2 54. 19.Rf6. 15.¢h2 ¤e1 52..¥f4 46. .. Fischer 1. 14.¤f3 ¤f6 4.¢f2 ¦g8 26. Kf7 would pro ¦e2 47.Nd5? 16.¦h6+ ¢d5 60.¤e5 The weakness of c6 is important.b4 ¤b7 33.b6.¦c3 The inactivity of White's pieces reduces the advantage of the extra pawn.h4 ¦c7 27. 11.¥b3 d6 8.Nc6 is a good alternative.¦a5 ¥xf3 50.¦xc5 ¤xc5 21.Ba3 is reminiscent of game 4 of the match! 16.¥e2 ¥b7 12. bxa4 13. ¢e8 29.c4 dxc4 3.b3 9.¥a3 b4 It is hard to believe that Fischer overlooked the obvious exchange sacrifice which follows.g.¦xd1 ¥xc5 9. ¥d5 15. Now White gets a powerful passed pawn. 35.¥g5 e5 34.¦xe5 ¤xe4 The point of the combination. ¢f7 48. ½-½ C90 D27 Spassky. but it is hard to find an alternative.Bxb3 20.¥f4 One might well expect White to win from this position.¤xd7 ¤xd7 18.¥xa6 f6 A mistake. while Black lacks any counterplay.¦g5 ¢e6 49.¦c1 This ties down the Nd7 and Bc5 therefore B l a c k e x p e r i e n c e s s o m e d i s c o m f o r t . ¥d6 17.¥c2 c5 11.¤c4 White has already achieved a completely dominating position because all of his pieces are active. a n d m a i n t a i n s t h e s t r o n g p i n .¥c7 ¦g7 61.¢h3 ¤f2+ 35. e.d4 d5 2. as discovered by t h e c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m D e e p T h o u g h t I I .Be2 Bb7 11. which saw 11. but it doesn't work.¥f4 f6 47.. White weakens the long diagonal without any good reason.¦e1 b5 7.¦f5 ¢g6 48.e4 A strategic disaster.¦d6 ¤e1 44.Bxg7 19. Fischer now embarks on a desperate sacrifice. e5 A mistake.¥xe5 ¢xe5 Score: Spassky 2.¥e5 ¤e8 44. capture at f3.¤xe5 ¤xe5 36.Bxa3 20.¢g3 ¤e1 56..gxf3 Rhg8 22. but human analysts felt that 46.0-0 a6 7.Nb6 seems best. a4 This makes 's task easier. so Spassky chose 1.. 15..¦g1 ¢f6 30..¥d3 38.¥xb4 Now White's position is superior thanks to his ferocious bishop and the vulnerable Black king.a4 bxa4 14.b4 is not on because of 14.Nb3 Be7 12.

19.Rad8 would have provided adequate counterplay. 18. and a pawnstorm.h3 12. 32. Black must be very careful with this methodical break. using prophylactic moves.g6 ¥f6 43. Alternatives include 9. but the pawn at h5 is better than at h7.dxc6 ¤xc6 15.Nxe5 Qxd5 22.O .¢b1 16.0-0-0 Black could now defend his backward pawn with . From a7 the queen can be transferred to e7 and help protect the kingside.Rhf1 intending Bg2 and f4 starting position of the hypermodern Saemisch.. Nxg7+ Kxd6 45..e4 d6 5.Ke8 34. the bishop pair. Rxe5 Qxe5 24. ¢f7 43.axb3 and there is no way to prevent c4.Nxd5 Nxd5 25.Kxf5 42.¤h4 ¥f6 The critical mistake. c4! Qd8 19.¤d5 b5 18.h4 An aggressive move. ¥e6 16.d7 42. 23. 23. ¤e7 13..hxg4 ¢f6 40..Bxc4 bxc4 21. for example h6 13. Fischer is playing in the style of Nimzowitsch here. Fischer supports the h5-square. 9 .¥d2 d5 A tactical error.¦xd1 ¦xe3 29. but White has one passed pawn and one potential passed pawn.. Sveti Stefan m 1992 29.¤d5 £a7 Black will capture at d5 at a more opportune moment. ¤d7 27. It can reoccupy the kingside Fischer.Nd6+ 34. d4 Qb6 ¥f8 13.Rxd6 Nd4 and White would have difficulty extricating the rook. Nc6 is correct.. cxd3 18. 36. Tal in a fairly similar situation.. ¥xd5 24. 16. c6 Time to chip away at the central wedge! 14.¤fe3 Spassky could have more aggressively exploited t h e k i n g s i d e s t r u c t u r e . since Black cannot eliminate the White pawn. 17.Nxf5 is an easy win for White.Bxd5 33.Bxd5 22.axb3 ¤xb3 This is the critical .¦f2 ¢e8 Black is m oving his king Spassky.Qxb7 and Black has no compensation for the pawn. 19.Rhc1 with control of the c-file..Nf5+ is a simple winning endgame..Qf3! Rxe5 23.¤f1 ¤f6 The knight has done its tour of duty at e8 and now it gets out of the way and reconnects t h e r o o k s .Bxc3 30.¤f1 ¥b7 14..cxd5 Nf6 23. 44.Nf1 might lead to some messy complications. comes into consideration since Black has no 9.Rc3 Rbc8 24.. The immediate effect is to discourage f3-f4. but his pawn structure will be more vulnerable in an endgame. 9 .¤g3 e4 24.cxd5 and the knight is obviously m u c h m o r e p o w e r f u l t h a n t h e b i s h o p ..cxb3 19. R b 1 .Qxd5 18. but the endgame nevertheless favors White.¢d3 ¥b2 38. things turn 1. ¤e8 Now Black pr otects the d-pawn and the g5square against the idea of Nf5+. The Spassky himself succeeded with d5 vs. because with the bishops gone it does not make sense to keep the position closed. This disrupts the coordination of Black's rooks but the knight will be redeployed at c7 or f6 at an appropriate moment. though very much in the spirit of the position.¦cf1 Spassky avoids the exchange of rooks and prepares the advance of the f.e4 ¥xd5 What else? 33. ¦d8 29.¦xd8+ ¥xd8 31.O . but the weakness of White's c-pawn and the presence of the king on t h e c .. 22.¤e3 ¦h8 Since there is no possibility of playing f7-f5 without great risk. B u t t h i s i s a b i t r i s k y .Ne7+ Kf7 34.. but the clerics are not all-powerful ayatollahs! 32.¤g3 g6 15.a4 b4 14.¤xf5 ¥xa5 Black hopes that the bishops will compensate for the missing pawns. ¤cb3 A simple but effective N c 1 . But he may have missed the redeployment of White's E84 bishop at h3..cxb4 cxb4 15.g7 The pawns are just too active. 26. 10..d5 12.¥d3 ¤d4 21.¥e4 This is the point.¤ge2 a6 8.¥h3 ¦c7 31.¤c3 ¥g7 4.exd5 h5 35. O .¥h6 Probably Spassky thought that his attack will be assisted by the inclusion of the pawn moves on the h-file.b4 It is even more effective.f4!? The idea is to play f5. ¦bc8 25. 30. But he never gets a chance to play it.¤d5 ¢f8 32.. because of the threat of mate at g2 .Nxd5 33.¤xe4 ¥g7 22.g5 White gains some space.Nc4 20. ¢f8 This is heavy-duty prophylaxis. Perhaps Fischer re-read Nimzowitsch's My System before the match. then the same break in the first game. 11.. 17.£d2 ¦b8 This is the strong! 31. £e7 26..Robert James later.g4 This break turns out to be ineffective.Ne4 is clearly better for White..¢f2 ¥xc3 Black finally gets this pawn out of the way. Even sacrificing the remaining piece will not help.¥e3 ¤c6 7. while the eventual occupation of the c-file by a Black rook.. which prove decisive.¤g3 To stop b7b5.¦c1 £b6 20.. h5 c o m b i n a t i o n . after which White is cruising.g4 hxg4 39. but perhaps this move is actually very 6.d7 1-0 Black does not allow the h-file to be opened easily with h4-h5.O-O-O is more logical.¤f4 Guarding g2 and forcing the next few moves. a 3 .cxd5 24. 17. immediate threats.d6 ¢e6 41. 24.My 160 Memorable Games 69 12. 9 .¥f1 ¤c5 30.¦c1 A good move or an oversight? As Spassky handles it.f4? Nxe4 31.Nd4.g5 a5 41. e5 Evidently a new idea. 28.fxe3 The smoke clears and Spassky's bishops are not enough compensation for the pawns.c4 g6 3.Qxd6 Qxd6 17.¦xe3 £xd1+ 28. 25.¥xd3 £xd5 19. 20. 26. ¤xe4 21.pawn. B h 6 a n d 9 .¥g5 h6 16. £xd2 27.¥xg7 ¢xg7 12.Ne3 Bf8 16.bxa5 f5 Spassky decides that he is going to sacrifice a piece for active counterplay..Bxg7 44.¤xg6 e3 This sharp continuation regains the piece. 21.Boris Vasily to a secure position.d4 ¤f6 2.¢e3 ¢f7 37.exd5 c4 Apparently Spassky overlooked a tactical point here or at the next move..Kd4 a4 46.f3 0-0 out badly.f i l e p r o v i d e o p t i o n s .

h6 g3 58.Bxc5 would be a dead draw.¢a5 ¢e5 46. but who get the prize first? 55.¥d4 The bishops of opposite color.Re7+? Kf3 50.¢xa6 The position appears very drawish but Fischer is determined to fight to the end and he almost succeeds. The basic idea is to sacrifice the exchange at just the right moment.¢b6 f4 All the passed pawns are racing toward the goal line. 43..¢c3 f5 37. Exchange V a r i a t i o n .Rxc5? 43. Ke3= f3 56.exd5+ ¥xd5 33.fxe5 19.Ra2 Kf1 intending Be2+ and Kxf2.¦h7 This is the only chance for counterplay.Nxc5+ and White should win easily. 29.¤xd4 c5 8. ¥d7 20.Robert James Sveti Stefan m 1992 1. One of the most dramatic games in the first part of the match. 14. Spassky tries to get a passed h. ¦xe3 49. Or 18. facing threats of b4-b3 and Qxf3.£xd2 £a5 18.¤b4+ and Spassky resigned.¤f3 ¤e4 12.e5 A strong move.Nxc5+ 20..Bxb3 18.Bf4 can be met by 13. ¦a7 36.¢b2 ¢e6 38.h4 ¢e7 22.¤xa6 fxe5 21.¤bxc5 ¥c8 19.e3 Black continues to develop quickly.¤c3 ¥b4 The Nimzoindian Defense.¢xd2 Once again we have an early endgame. another of Fischer's hypermodern f a v o r i t e s . forcing a draw.a5 bxa5 41.Nc3 Ne7 Black has a comfortable position since 13.¥e5 f6 23. Rd7 Re8 24. 34. Even against less precise play a draw would still be likely. however.Bd4 Bg6 32.bxc3 ¥xc3 The critical position of the opening. suggest an evaluation of the position as roughly level.Kc5 Kg2 58. Skopje 1976. improving on a 1 9 7 6 g a m e . g4 24. 33.¢c3 ¥d5+ 39..Ne4 Bxb3 19.¥e3 b6 13.. but contrary to some opinion. h6 There are all sorts of alternatives here. Black plans Kd5. .¦f8 ¢f4 58.¥xc3 ¦c8 31. Fischer has the advantage now. 18.pawn. ¢c6 17.Rf6 Bc4+ 63. ¢f3 52. Spassky is enough of a specialist in the Tarrasch to appreciate that! £xd2+ 19. ¥c6 32. 3 draws.. 55.d4 ¤f6 2.Bxb3 1 9. 17.c4.¢c5 The most accurate move. Fischer clearly is happy to get into a theoretical brawl. 1-0 E35 Spassky.cxb3 Ne7 21.Rd1! Ne7 20.bxc5 20.c4 e6 3.Rxh7 R e 1 + 2 6 . 17.¦xd1 ¥g4 10.Ng5 Nc6 21. ¢xe3 50.Rf8 f2 57. though White's game would be very passive. Nbxc5+ and White wins. Spassky 2.Rc3!? was probably wiser.Nd6+ Kc6 20. An effective opening preparation leading to a quick kill and a big match lead.Rxa6 Nd5 was agreed drawn in Adorjan-Ivkov.¥h4 c5 8.f2 59.¢c2 ¥e8 Black wants to exchange rooks.0-0 f6 6.¦b5 £a3 16. ¦b3 47.¦c1 ¢e6 25.Ke3 g3 60.¤f3 ¤c6 3.axb6 cxb6 18.axb6 cxb6 18. with a balanced game.¥f1 White could probably have resigned here. keeping up the battle for d5 and employing themes of the Queen's Gambit Declined..¥g5 A natural con tinuation.dxc5 ¤c6 9.¥xc6 dxc6 Fischer abandons the Spanish Inquisition in favor of one of his old weapons.¢b2 ¥e4 40.¢b1 £xe3 Finally the queen achieves an active position! 40. undermining the support of d4.b7 Kxb7 20.¤b3 £xd1 9.¥d4 ¢d5 35. Rxa6+ Kb7 21. 4.¦e8 ¢xg3 53. b6 28.¢xa4 ¥d5 45.¢c2 b4 White resigned.cxd5 exd5 6. but Fischer sticks to the main line.¦xa6 35. Has Fischer kept up withthetheory? d5 This is an proved plan.£c2 Spassky responds with the Classical variation. avoiding the exchange of queens. and then Re8-e2+.¢d4 ¥f5 57.h8Q and a draw is likely.¢xa1 £a7+ 39.¦b1 £xc5 15.a4 This creates a weakness.Boris Vasily Sveti Stefan m 1992 1.¥xc6 ¥xc6 21..Robert James Spassky.h7 f1Q 60.e4 After this advance Black's bishop gains additional scope.fxe3 49. 5.h5 ¥d3+ 54.e4 e5 2.Bc3 was a safer option.f3 ¥e6 11.Rxg7 Rxe5 25. cxb3 f5 19. ¥d6 12... 7.¢b2 ¦xc3 30.¦b5 a4 42. which takes advantage of the abandonment of the d-file by the White queen.Rdc2 Ra7 Intending Kg7.¦c7 ¢e4 48..g3 ¥c4 This locks in the White rook.¦xh5 ¥e4 51.a3 was wiser.¥b5 Spassky plays for a win after three disappointing games. 27. The complications which follow are both interesting and instructive. Bxg5 Kxb6 23. the Exchange Variation.¦xd8 ¥xd8 Here is where Fischer innovates.axb6 Bxg5 22.¦c3 ¦hc8 27.¦b3 ¥xd2+ 17. ¥e7 16. rather than waste time picking up the weak p a w n a t c 5 . and the fact that White's is more active. Score: Fischer 3.¤c3 This is an important move order finesse.d4 exd4 7.Boris Vasily Fischer.Rxe3+ Kg2 51.a4 0-0-0 14. when the d-file will be blocked.My 160 Memorable Games 70 position. h 4 ! 18.Rf7 Kg1 61.. not a new idea.Be3 b6 12. ¤xd2+ 34.¤e4 Exploiting the possibility of a fork at c5.¦c5 ¦b7+ 42.. ¦a1+ 38. 0-1 C69 Fischer. . 19.¦b4 h5 26.Kd4 Bh7 59.¥b5 a6 4.Ke2 Bg8 62. 31. which has surged in popularity in the last decade.¦h8 White is ready to advance his pawn.. K f 2 R b 1 2 7 .¥e3 ¦c7 36. 5.¥g3 £a5 11.¤d2 ¤xc3 13.¢a3 a6 44.¦c6 33.¦c6 ¢g7 37.a5 ¢b7 15. g5 10.¦xd2 ¢f8 35.b7! Kxb7 20. when the pawns can be activated.h6 f3 56.Ra3 Bf3 52. 11.Qc2!? is Kasparov's p r e f e r e n c e .

exd4 10...fxe5 25. 22. But the blocking of the long diagonal creates an interesting opportunity for White.exf5+ Kf8 17..Qxd8+ Kxd8 13.Ne7 would have been more cautious but White would have had a s t r o n g p o s i t i o n i n a n y c a s e .e5. gxf5 22.¤xh6 f6 The losing move. but there is nothing wrong with this choice.axb4 cxb4 10. Fischer usually prefers the well-traveled paths of more topical lines.Nxf5 16..¢xe8 ¢f4 45. .¢d6 [ 41.Nxd6 Bc6 21.Rb5 and Black has no counterplay at all.¤c4 ¤h6 Now the White knight makes a brilliant leap. h3 O-O 11..¢d7 ¢e4 43.Boris Vasily 39.Ra1 and the a-pawn goes..¢c3 £c6+ 65.Ke7 29. 7.e4 c5 After the disaster of the previous Spanish 44..¢c3 £c5+ 67.Rd8+ Kg7 24.. ] Inquisition.d4 10. Rxc2 bxc2 28.Rxe5+ Kf6 . 11. £d7 12.axb4 Ne7 10.dxe5 dxe5 12.Qxd6 Qxd6 20.¤xh8 ¦xh8 21. 27. This time. 25.¤cxd6+ ¢f8 17.Rd6 Ba4 31.f6+ Kg8 19.Kf8 23.¢b3 £d5+ 66. cxb4 8. 29.. because there are some weaknesses in Black's position. since a losing endgame is inevitable: ¢d3 42.¢f2 b2 36..¢f7 ¢g5 46.¥xc6 bxc6 Theory prefers 4.¢b3 £c2+ 63..¦a7 ¥e8 34. 59.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¦b7 ¢c3 Fischer.Kf2 a4 31. b u t o p t s f o r 6 .g4 ¢c2 38. Spassky consistently rejects previous p r a x i s .¦d1+ ¢e5 28.¢c5 ¢c2 41.¦xa5 B31 The rest is simple.Ra6 30.. £c1+ 62.bxa3 9.Qb6 13. ¦xc1 26..Nxd6+ Ke7 17.. 29.¢b2 £b4+ 68.0-0 ¥g7 6.Robert James 35. . 18. 5.fxe5 ¦xc2 24.Bd2! regains the pawn with interest.¥b5 Somewhat of a surprise.d3 gives White a slightly better position. enjoying the theoretical duels..¢g7 etc.¢e3 ¥f7 37..Kh1 Qc5 16. Ra6! Bd5 22.d4 exd4 would transpose back to the game.Nf5+! wins for White.Bxa3 d6 gives White sufficient compensation for the pawn.Nd2 Bxd4 14.d6 9.. Spassky slides into Sicilian territory.. since the bishop is pinned.dxc6. 13.Re7+ 23. c5 8.d6?! 11.h8£ g1£+ 61. g6 4. with the bishop pair working to Black's advantage.Bxd4 Nf6 would be roughly equal. but how much more? 9. b3 33.h7 g2 60. ¥c6 26.exf5+ ¥e5 The only way to avoid losing a rook.¦e1 e5 A critical advance..¢d4 b1£ Spassky.¦xc1 ¢d6 28.¤df7 £xd1 19... 1-0 2.Bxg7+ Kxg7 18.¢c4 Now all White has to do is avoid the e x c h a n g e o f q u e e n s .¤d2 ¥b7 13. it is decisive. But 8.¦c1 T h i s f o r c e s t h e e x c h a n g e o f r o o k s . 14..¦c1 ¥d7 31.Rc1 Be4 29.¢d6 Sveti Stefan m 1992 and Black resigned. 12.b4 A typical example of a move which is trivial when played prematurely (at move 2) but which can be quite effective if delayed until an appropriate moment.Kxf5 30. which prevents White from playing e4-e5 or d2-d4.¤xd4 12.e7 a5 Black's last gasp.¤f5+ A reprise of the main theme.e6 The protected passed pawn will remain a pain in B l a c k ' s s i d e f o r s o m e t i m e .g4 a5 30..¥b2 d6 Now the long diagonal can be the site of some tactical operations. f 6 i n g a m e 1 3 ..Ke3 and Black can give up.. Nc4 Bxf2+ 15.¦axd1 ¢e7 20. 15.a3 This gambit underlines the defects of 6.f4 ¦c8 24.b3 27.¢a2 ½-½ 26. 16.Bb2 d6 11.¤f5 ¥xb2 15.¢b4 £e4+ 64.¦c5+ ¢d4 32.¦xb1 ¢xb1 40. Rxa7! would lead to a rapid White victory.My 160 Memorable Games 71 since Black cannot do anything with his initiative..e8£+ ¥xe8+ 1.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful