CRITICAL THOMISM, REALITY, AND POLITICS BY ANTHONY J.

FEJFAR

Critical Thomism, Reality, and Politics By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif Lulu Press ISBN# 978-0-557-03775-9 © Copyright 2008 by Anthony J. Fejfar

Critical Thomism, Reality, and Politics Introduction This is a Collection of Essays dealing with Critical Thomist Jurisprudence, Reality, and Politics. Table of Contents 1. Formal Operations Thinking 2. Bergson, Evolution, Genesis, and Quantum Physics 3. Burden of Proof and Intent: Mental Incompetency 4. Classical Morality not Conventional Morality 5. Critical Thomism and Kant 6. Critical Thomism and the Liberal Compact 7. Drugs and Mental Illness 8. Druid Catholic Mass 9. Due Process and Magna Charta 10. Evolution and Utopia 11. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and Metaphysics 12. God and Communism 13. God, Communism, and the Rule of Law 14. Individual Rights and Patriarchy 15. Is Al Queda a Nazi Terrorist Organization? 16. I Opus Dei a Nazi Front Organization? 17. The Green Party 18. Law School

The Christ Child 37. Lonergan and Critical Thomism 21. The Correcting Entry 39. Quantum Physics and Sunlight 30. Substance and the Holy Spirit 35. Limiting Lawyer Malpractice 20. Purgatory 29. Reincarnational Estoppel 32. The Dark Side of the Force 40. The Ethical Dilemma of Flyboys . Psychiatry and Justice 28. The Contingent Loan for Attorney’s Fees 38. Motivation and Self-transcendence 24. The Lease as an Equitable Use 36. The Episcopalian Catholic Church 41. Self-actualization 33. Lonergan’s Cognitional Structure 23. Mind Control 22. Seth. and Critical Thomism 34. Nazi Dupes 26. Reason and Higher Love 31. Oblivion 27. Natural Law and Music 25.19. Consciousness.

The Lurking God 47. The Crime of Penury 50. The Wild Deed 55. The Sons of Liberty (2) 54. The Moderation Corporation and Income Tax 48. Trinitarian Democracy 60. Quantum Field Theory 62.42. Timing and Intent 56. Transcendental Method and Postmodernism 59. Transcendental Method and Epistemology 58. Why Critical Thomism is a Postmodern Philosophy . Truth. The Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom and Form 46. Quantum Field Theory and Being 63. The Nolo Contendere Plea 49. The Fallacy of Shifting Ground 43. and Evil 61. The Sons of Liberty (1) 53. To the Death and Beyond 57. Athiestic Materialism 64. The Great Society 45. Relativism. The Republican Manifesto 51. The Final Solution 44. The Schizophrenic Driver 52.

65. Why Wisdom is not Satanism 67. Zen and Daoism . Workfare 68. Why Santa Claus really Exists 66.

there is a more abstract. asserted in his work that beyond the simple. You see. hypo-deductive thought. In this essay I am giving a short test for formal operations so that the reader can see. J. if he or she can think hypo-deductively. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.. making the path impassible. Path A is paved with asphalt Sign B: Path B is 1 mile long Path B is 2 feet wide . Esq. or. describing that path: Sign A: Path A is 1 mile long Path A is 3 feet wide Path A has a snack bar by the path Path A at the half way point has a bridge which is down for construction. and the second marked Path B. naïve thinking of concrete operations. difficult type of thinking known as formal operations.. one path marked Path A. Here is the problem for you to solve: Chris is walking down a path and comes to a fork in the path. Fejfar The developmental psychologist Piaget.D.Chapter 1 A Short Test for Formal Operations Thinking By Anthony J. people in concrete operations cannot plan for the future. Concrete people cannot compare and contrast possible alternative future courses of action and choose a future which is logically superior. Fejfar. There is a sign at the head of each path.

given the goal of reaching your destination. and choose the path which logically is better. (Scroll down for the correct answer below after taking the test). you the reader are required to choose the best path with the goal in mind of reaching a destination 3 miles down the path after the point where paths A and B have merged and have become one path again. BEGIN the TEST. You are to compare and contrast the good and bad points about both paths A and B. .Path B has no snack bar Path B has no bridge and is open all the way Path B is a dirt path Now.

.ANSWER: Path B While Path A has some nice features. with the bridge out it cannot be used to get to the destination.

and Quantum Physics By Anthony J. molecular. Esq. with causation from outside of space-time by God and metaphysics. not with gradual incremental changes.Chapter 2 Bergson.. Recall that Quantum Physics is based upon the scientific idea that the Quantum Field exists outside of space-time. that you cannot change the atom itself. on the other hand. in his work on evolution. There is no reason. B. changes in biological reality. if you . And. My response is that evolution takes place using Quantum Physics and Quantum Change.D. is. when you think about it. Bergson. Fejfar For many persons. Evolution. in Genesis in the Bible. And. however. argue that evolution involves planned change from outside of space-time. argued that evolution could only take place with rapid. following Bergson. complex. there is no reason to think that you could not change a molecule. following Darwin. logically. J.. Genesis.A. Fejfar. I. the idea that people were created by God. if you can change an atom. as a very gradual process of evolutionary change which is consistent with atheistic materialism. evolution is seen. but can certainly produce changes on the atomic. how can we get to this notion of evolution and still stay in the realm of science. could be seen as evidence that evolution takes place very rapidly. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. or even biological levels. The question. The Quantum Field exists on a subatomic level. involving God and metaphysics. to think that if you can change the subatomic makeup of an atom.. Of course.

even to the extent of producing a whole new species of animal. in general. could produce large and sudden evolutionary changes. it is possible that evolutionary meaning on the Quantum level. . out of nothingness. and certainly metaphysics. Thus.can change a molecule. but really out of the Quantum Field. or creation of human beings by God in the Bible. as if. there really is no contradiction between the idea of theistic evolution. ex nihilo. or even human beings. and the notion of scientific evolution. which very well might involve God. there is no reason to think that you could not change a biological cell. Thus.

in part. because the type of intent required for a particular type of activity parallels the burden of which is required to prove a relevant fact at trial. using a legal proceeding.Chapter 3 Burden of Proof and Intent: Mental Incompetency and a finding Of Judicially Incompetent to Stand Trial: An Analysis By Anthony J. in relation to law. and what is required to prove a fact. or reality. or contract. B.” I have also heard psychiatric social workers argue that one who is not “Judicially Competent to Stand Trial” cannot own property. one had to be “Judicially Competent to Stand Trial.A. I would like to argue that these persons are mistaken. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. They are as follows: .D. tells us that we live in a world and universe of moderate relativism... I have argued previously that contemporary science. J. Thus. There is no absolute certainty in this world or universe.. Fejfar. Esq. only probable knowledge. there are three different standards of proof which must be proved. based on Quantum Physics. Fejfar I once heard a psychologist argue that in order to practice law.

-involuntary psychiatric commitments. the standard for “reality” is different. Civil Case.property. environmental or corporate regulation. constitutional rights at law without equity Preponderance of the Evidence 55% standard of proof/reality 2. If a person is alleged to be . Now. then that person is judicially competent to stand trial to own property and to contract. some type of test is required. and thus. Civil Regulatory Case. the type of intent required to intend reality for that type of proceeding is different. contracts. Criminal Case. but it should generally say that if the person is 55% accurate in the person’s reality perceptions. Thus.licensure.Prosecution of Criminal Defendant Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt 99. tort. my point is that in each of the three different proceedings discussed above.9999999% standard of proof/reality Now. I suppose. guardianships -Clear and Convincing Evidence 85% standard of proof/reality 3. the following is true: In order to be judicially incompetent to contract or own property one must not be able to know reality at a percentage of 55% or better.1.

but not have the judicial intent necessary to practice law or take care of one’s own affairs without supervision. if a person is alleged to be delusional. one must not be able to know reality at a percentage of 85% or better. Now. such that the person cannot form contractual intent or ownership intent. for example. have and exercise constitutional rights. Thus. could not be subject to a guardianship. Again. or have dementia. one could have the judicial intent necessary to own property or contract. or criminal intent. However. such a person could also own property and have the power to contract. in order to be judicially incompetent to take care of your own personal or financial affairs (guardianship). or to be judicially incompetent on the basis of being a danger to oneself or a third person (involuntary commitment).99999% probability. criminal intent. it is possible that a person does not reach the 85% test for involuntary commitment (knows reality below 85% perceptually) and also clearly does not meet the 99.delusional. and such a person could practice law. or hallucinatory. it is equally true that a person could know reality at 87% probability but not 99. such that the person cannot form regulatory intent. or have dementia. or to be judicially incompetent to practice law (hold a license).9999999% .then it must be proved that the person’s intent is less accurate than 55% or better. practice law. it would also have to proven that the proposed guardian was more competent in this respect than the proposed ward. or hallucinatory. Of course.99999% test for criminal liability. contract. then it must be proved that the person’s intent/reality perception is less accurate than 85% or better. in order to be judicially incompetent to stand trial to form mens rea. that is. A Criminal Conviction requires that the Defendant must have really known what he or she was doing at a percentage of 99. and thus could be involuntary committed to a psychiatric ward for some period of time for being a danger to oneself or another. one must be found to be judicially incompetent to stand trial by reason of not being able to know reality at a level of 99. yet still be acquitted of criminal charges for lack of specific or criminal intent. or there is no basis for specific intent. logically. Obviously. Finally. could not be involuntarily committed. The idea that a criminal defendant has been found judicially incompetent to stand trial for an inability to form specific intent cannot be used as a basis for asserting that such a person cannot own property. Similarly. .999999%.

A. these individuals. a form of neo-thomism. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. are applying Classical Morality. Esq. as a metaphysical quiddity. independent of any knower. when a person says that he or she trys to be “good.Chapter 4 Classical Morality not Conventional Morality By Anthony J. if they are to be categorized at level 3. So. one is ordered toward The Good. B. Thus. individual or universal principles. may instead be applying the post-conventional morality of level 6.. J. Fejfar Developmental Psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg argued that level 3 moral thinking is conventional morality. and as an End. I would like to argue that some people at level 3 may seem to conventional. . The argument is that The Good actually exists. Fejfar.. Critical Thomism.D. as a Platonic Form or as a Substantial Form. Conventional Morality means that a person follows a specific authority for moral directions or guidance.. and Neo-Platonism both hold the position that ethically and morally. Thus. not conventional morality. but really aren’t.” this is probably interpreted as being a person who is living up to conventional expectations by unreflectively following some authority. it would appear that some persons who appear to be applying conventional moral standards.

they base their morality upon a self decided upon scale of values under the Utility function of the Ethical Matrix. concretely. my self chosen scale of values.Chapter 5 Critical Thomism and Kant’s Categorical Imperative By Anthony J. my morality. Maximization of Value. this finds expression in each individual selecting and then acting upon an individual scale of values. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. J. Fejfar. In this sense it is existential. While some may base their morality upon an external moral authority. Fejfar While Critical Thomists base their Ethics on the Ethical Matrix. While Utility means. As I have asserted previously. The morality of a Critical Thomist is based upon self chosen values. Esq...D. is as follows: . the Critical Thomist does not.

For Kant. Rationally. that is. those values which are most meaningful to me. the Categorical Imperative tested whether or not a position could be Universalizable. whether or not the position meets the requirements of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. ideally.1. his Self Actualization. my chosing to actualize. do choose that everyone would choose the same scale of . that is. My Self Actualization.. My Autonomy. 4. his Rational Self Interest. his autonomy. that is. Helping others. 3. for me. and the Critical Thomist. for him. and his helping others. My Rational Self Interest. even some judges take as a litmus test of the validity of an ethical or legal position.e. what I rationally think is best for myself. So. the question is would I wish that. i. my Self Directedness. some people. typically through work. I Tony Fejfar. everyone would choose the same scale of values that I have. 2. Now.

my morality position and scale of values passes the test of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. .values that I have chosen. for him or herself. Thus.

Esq. While Utility. my Self Directedness.Chapter 6 Critical Thomism and The Liberal Compact By Anthony J. is as follows: 5. Fejfar. Fejfar While Critical Thomists base their Ethics on the Ethical Matrix. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. As I have asserted previously. Maximization of Value. my morality.. that is. . the Critical Thomist does not.. The morality of a Critical Thomist is based upon self chosen values. my self chosen scale of values. concretely. J. selecting and then acting upon an individual scale of values.D. In this sense it is existential. While some may base their morality upon an external moral authority. they base their morality upon a self decided upon scale of values under the Utility function of the Ethical Matrix. My Autonomy. this finds expression in each individual means.

my chosing to actualize. 7. I also act to defend the Rational Self Interest of other Liberal Critical Thomists. that is. what does this mean. those values which are most meaningful to me. as paramount. that is. not only do I try to help others in my Life. Not only do I act to defend my own Rational Self Interest. Thus. Finally. not only do I argue for my Autonomy as paramount. The Liberal Compact provides that every Liberal must support every other Liberal in protecting that Liber al’s individual rights. Critical Thomist must support the Liberal scale of values not only for myself.6. I am also concerned with the Liberal Compact. Not only do I support my own Self Acutalization. practically? Well. as Critical Thomist. I also argue for the Autonomy of every other Liberal Critical Thomist. My Self Actualization. Helping others Now. as a Liberal. it means that I. Now. My Rational Self Interest. what I rationally think is best for myself. but. . 8. I also act to encourage other Liberal Critical Thomists to help others. I also act to support the Self Actualization of other Liberal Critical Thomists. but for every other Liberal Critical Thomist. typically through work.

This force is even more powerful than conventional morality.This is the Liberal Critical Thomist Compact. and the Holy Spirit are each Liberal Critical Thomists. The Common Good is merely the aggregate of all of us pursuing the Individual Good together. I suspect that even God the Father. . It is perhaps the most powerful force in reality. The Critical Thomist Liberal Compact supports the Individual Good. and it works. Jesus the Son. the Common Good. and collectively.

Dan was currently investigating the causes of mental illness. and was an investigative reporter. Dan had a different hypothesis. Dan wondered if most mental illness might be caused by the person. Fejfar. and held his Juris Doctor degree in Law.. though. Most psychiatrists claimed mental illness was caused by genetically abnormal brain functioning. or hallucinogenic drugs. B. . taking poison. Esq.. Dan was a undergraduate double major in English and Philosophy from Duequense University. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. so their careers would be destroyed.A.. unknowingly.Chapter 7 Drugs and Mental Illness A Work of Fiction An Allegorical Tale By Anthony J. Dan had a weekly column.D. from the University of Pittsburgh. J. the patient’s neurons just weren’t firing the right way. According to the psychiatrists. Fejfar Dan Spencer was a newspaper reporter for the Pittsburgh Enquirer Weekly Newspaper. Dan had a friend who was a Russian reporter who found KGB files indicating an espionage program designed to make people appear to be mentally ill.

Dan ran this story in the Pittsburgh. and because most of the drugging was being done by the CIA and FBI. Enquirer. The next week.Dan had another friend in the Czech MI5 intelligence organization who told Dan that the FBI and the CIA had a similar program to get rid of progressives and liberals in the United States. and hoped for the best. the tests came back showing that Dan’s friend had LSD. The aide said. Dan took his friend out to eat. often in the homes of the persons. Almost all of the patients had the same drugs and substances in their blood as Dan’s friend. before they were hospitalized. and having their blood drawn and analyzed. where a friend of his had been diagnosed with Schizo-affective disorder for believing in Natural Law. . Dan spent six months interviewing other mental health patients. Because. Dan then bribed a psychiatric aide for information and found that psychiatry was deeply involved with “controlling” political “dissidents. off the facility. Dan thought that he had better check into the problem. arsenic. Dan’s friend was shocked at what the tests showed and said that he had never taken any sort of drugs or substances for any reason. Dan visited his friend on the Ward and asked him if he knew anything about any of these drugs or substances. Dan started by going out to the State Mental Hospital. lead. PCP. So. and camphor in his blood. no. the psychiatric hospital had a very powerful satanic cult.” Dan asked if they were worried about getting caught and going to jail. and then they stopped at a private clinic and had some of his friend’s blood drawn for lab work.

There could be no false gods or a God worshipped beside Caesar. J. not Roman Catholic. Why the Jewish worship of God was tolerated is unclear. Seth Speaks. Esq. I have it on good authority that the idea of Roman Catholicism was an invention of a religious affairs reporter for Newsweek Magazine. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and seems to be the exception that makes the rule. Fejfar. I personally like the idea of a Druid Catholic Church. contrary to postmodern myth.. not just blacks. but I never liked the term much. B. distinguishing it from Anglican “Catholicism. or perhaps even God himself. And.A.” I think that there are other metaphors we could use to denominate the Catholic Church.. There was slavery in Rome. Growing up. but whites too. Caesar was worshipped as a god. and Aristotle. long before they actually physically incarnated on Earth. In his book. by Jane Robert. . I think that the Druid tradition was informed by the Holy Spirit long before the historical coming of Jesus of Nazareth on Earth. I guess Rome did some positive things for Western Civilization. there was no religious freedom in Rome.Chapter 8 Druid Catholic Mass By Anthony J.. I think that these Speakers were the early Druids and that they presaged the coming of Christ. Plato.” were teaching in Europe as far back as Cro Magnon times.D. but of course there were some big negatives too. we just called ourselves Catholic. In fact. Fejfar I was raised a Roman Catholic. Seth states that spiritual “Speakers” who channeled information from the “other side.

The real Catholic Mass. A Druid Mass. Perhaps the notion of a Druid Catholic Church is a little too much for some. . because. like some sort of cannibals. metaphysically. This is the real doctrine and practice of tran-substanc[e]-iation (transubstanciation) as taught by the Church Councils at Nicea and at Trent. is a Druid Catholic Mass. maybe good start would be the development of an Episcopalian Catholic Church. the Mass is essentially a nature sacrifice. Now. instead we have a transformative nature sacrifice of the bread and wine (or grape juice) into the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ in Substance. it makes perfect sense that women can be Catholic Priests and offer the sacrifice of the Mass. to me. We do not sacrifice the material body and blood of Jesus Christ in the Mass. not the sacrifice of a male on an altar.

Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and where the is a right of appeal. should conform to the laws of England. Fejfar One might wonder what Due Process of Law.. if any. 1681. where the litigant can cross examine witnesses. the law of Pennsylvania. in accordance with the Natural Law of Liberty. continues even today. the Charter of the Province of Pennsylvania states that so far as is conveniently possible. Magna Charta. I argue that Due Process of Law was present prior to the 14th Amendment.. and the Charter for the Province of Pennsylvania By Anthony J.” This means both substantive and procedural due process are required in the enforcement of any civil or criminal law in Pennsylvania. as of that time. or property. whether civil or criminal. where the rules of evidence apply. prior to the enactment of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. that is. This means that Pennsylvania is required to follow the requirements of Magna Charta. B.A. without a jury trial in accordance with the law of the land.Chapter 9 Due Process. and . In the Charter for the Province of Pennsylvania. Fejfar. Finally. this means that the litigant. this means that any governmental law or action must be “reasonably related to a legitimate government interest. was applicable in States such as Pennsylvania. and that such Due Process of Law on the State Level. Esq. Magna Charta requires that no person can be deprived of life. With respect to substantive due process.” With respect to procedural due process. has the right to a fair hearing where there is an impartial trier of fact and law. liberty..D. J. the Charter clearly states that all laws of Pennsylvania must be “consonant to reason. the British Constitution.

.procedural and substantive due process. Thus. it is clear that Pennsylvania has both substantive and procedural due process rights without referring to the 14the Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Fresh fruit in all tribal societies would only be available in the Fall. Now. alternatively.A. evolutionary changes. The idea is that evolution somehow produces constructive. Both these options seem unlikely based upon the current idea that humans evolved from apes on the African plains. scurvy causes a failure in the development of bones and teeth. somehow. J. B. In small children. Instead. such as human beings. Based on our modern experience. If they don’t get it they get scurvy. argued that random mutations tried in the court of evolutionary competition. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Maybe this makes some sense. that somehow our bodies would not need vitimin C. or. it would seem that if evolution worked the way Darwin suggested. then. human being were created or evolved in a Utopian society where fruit was available the whole year. by Creation. or Creative Evolution. an often fatal disease. Fejfar Charles Darwin.. but I’m not sure. Esq. Vitimin C really can only be found in significant quantities in fresh fruit. Fejfar.. is responsible for evolution of all species.. then humanity must have evolved where there was fresh fruit available the year round. positive.Chapter 10 Evolution and Utopia By Anthony J. In adults it causes tooth loss.D. Perhaps. canning of fruit must have been available. Human being need vitimin C in order to survive. the idea of a Garden of . Let us consider this situation. if evolution were really true. and only for a short period of time. it takes a sophisticated world wide economy in order for fresh fruit to be available the year round. and only where fruit trees are growing. No. the noted Evolutionist.

Eden, where people had fresh fruit the year round, or so the common myth has it, is supported by the idea of evolution itself.

Chapter 11 Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and Metaphysics By Anthony J. Fejfar, J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar In the Gadamer-Habermas debate, Habermas argues that there is no way to avoid the hermenutic circle, and thus that Gadamer’s Hermeneutic position is logically circular and invalid. I, on the other hand, argue that Gadamer’s Hermeneutics are valid because they are based upon metaphysics. Gadamer asserts that Hermeneutics, that is, philosophy of meaning, is based upon the idea that there are certain “forestructures of knowing” which guide hermeneutic interpretation. Obviously, if these forestructures are just ideas, then it would appear that hermeneutics are circular in nature and thus invalid. I would argue that just as Plato argued for the idea of the World of the Forms, so too, hermeneutics is guided by what I would call Hermeneutic Forms. I argue that Gadamer’s position is Platonist and is thus grounded in Metaphysics. Since the forestructures of knowing are in fact transcendent Immutable Platonic Forms, in the World of the Forms, better interpretations are possible. Additionally, using Lonerganian epistemology it is possible to argue that intuitive judgment and reflection are cognitive functions which transcend mere analytic understanding or hermeneutic interpretation. The argument is that intuition enables us to transcend hermeneutic understanding and helps to to find a better interpretation.

Chapter 12 God and Communism By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx, its author, takes the position that God is an infantile projection and that religion is the Opiate of the People. I argue that Marx point has some validity, but overall is wrong In his book, “The Two Sources of Morality and Religion,” philosopher Henri Bergson discusses two types of religion and two types of God. In the first type of religion, let us call this, Conventional Religion, religion is based upon inauthentic authority. People are taught to “pray, pay, and obey,” and nothing more. Genuine spirituality is suspect at best, considered evil at worst. Genuine spirituality or religious experience is considered evil by conventional people because the spiritual person has a direct pipeline to God, bypassing the religious authority system. I argue that spiritual people are Intuitive Mystics who value autonomy, rational self interest, self actualization, and helping others. Conventional people, on the other hand, value obedience, fitting in, conformity, appearances, the status quo, authoritarianism, and meaningless religious ritual. The “God” of convention fits with the religion of convention. The Conventional God is authoritarian, demand strict obedience, values appearances, values conformity, hates spiritual experience. This conventional God is the false God criticized by Karl Marx in the Communist manifesto. The religion criticized by Marx as the opiate of the people is precisely conventional religion

The God of Being encourages an intellectual life based upon Reason.The second type of religion that Bergson speaks of is Intuitive. authoritarianism. it is possible to believe in the God of Being and be a Communist. not a three piece suit or a fancy dress. Intuitive religion is Spirituality. . not the God of authority. or Intellectual religion. from each according to his ability. Communism mean Equity. only the God of Convention. Understood in this sense. appearances. The God of Being inspires us to pursue Justice and Social Justice. and empty religious rituals with no spirituality involved. Karl Marx did not criticize the God of Being in the Communist Manifesto. such as. The God of Being encourages us to wear khaki shorts to church in the summer. “To each according to his need. or Spiritual. The God of Being encourages artistic creativity. For the Spiritual Theist. There is no contradiction. Intuitive religion is where the participant actually actually comes into real contact with God. not conformity and not the status quo. conformity. Karl Marx did not criticize the God of Being. then.” Keeping in mind of course that those with abilities have needs too. The God of Being despises. This is the God of Being. self actualization needs.

and they manifest probabilistically. and Procedural Law. and the Rule of Law By Anthony J. flawed. Tort. the masters of that society still felt that Law was needed. Law is ordered toward Justice. which exists independent of any knower in Substantial Form.. Utility. not cookie cutters. J. however. B. This is the Platonist position. The Aristotelian position is that the Rule of Law. These are neither economic nor political principles. Esq. Contract. from time to time. is a Metaphysical Law. This is absurd.D. in the Communist Manifesto. and Equity is ordered toward Social Justice. Law is based upon four Natural Law Ethical Principles: Reciprocity. Thus. Proportionality. Common Law Rules relating to Property. Finally. Fejfar. is a Metaphysical Law. and merely reflects economics or politics. I would simply note that even in corrupt Communist societies like the Soviet Union. The Rule of Law contains within it all the laws necessary for a Just and Equitable legal system. argued that Law is a sham. the Forms exist in the Mind of God. I argue that God favors the Rule of Law and Metaphysics. all exist in the World of the Forms as an aspect of the Rule of Law. The Forms are guides. For Theists.Chapter 13 God. Law cannot be reduced to mere economics or politics. Fejfar The Rule of Law. While Law may take economics or politics into account as factors to be considered. which exists independent of any knower. There was a Soviet Constitution and a Soviet Judicial System.. and Equity. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Karl Marx..A. in the World of The Forms. Communism. .

Patriarchy. First. Fejfar. While Jesus may have been married. on the other hand has produced political liberalism and the Rule of Law. not an authoritarian Father. I argue that such consequences are exactly what we would see. I argue that Patriarchy is good and matriarchy is evil. Christianity itself is based upon the norm of adolescent Son-Reason. since the time of its founder. for example. in the end I suspect that lesbian women who are artistically inclined and who are not “great mothers” would also be enslaved and murdered in ritual sacrifices. horticultural societies promoted both slavery and human sacrifice. Ken Wilber... while at first it would seem that only men would be satanically enslaved and sacrificed. If matriarchy were to reappear today. our culture promotes and enshrines adolescent Son-Reason. Esq. Additionally. As Jesus said in the . utilizes democratic procedures based upon reason and the individual inspiration of the Holy Spirit.Chapter 14 Individual Rights and Patriarchy vs. Fejfar Some feminists argue that Patriarch is evil and matriarchy is good. Patriarchy has two forms. that is Reason. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. The Paulist Order. Matriarchy By Anthony J. On the contrary. Isaac Hecker. there is no mention of this in the Gospels.. Father authoritarianism and adolescent Son- Reason. B.D. Roman Catholic religious life. The Jesus of the Gospels was an adolescent not an authoritarian Father. protecting individual rights and equality. let us consider the historical record of matriarchy. in his anthropological work argues that matriarchal. While some individual Fathers might be authoritarian. Jesus Christ is the Logos.A. J. in fact. Good judges and good presidents and good corporate executives are good because they are reasonable not because they are authoritarian. at its best promotes reason based decision making not authoritarianism.

Gospels. this is not authoritarian patriarchy. Adolescent patriarchy is to be preferred to matriarchy. .” Clearly. “the Father has given everything over to the Son.

Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. most of us were shocked and simply could not figure out how it happened. This has been reported in the news. we have the East German Nazi Party which basically operated as the East German Communist Party until the Wall went down. one might ask.. Al Queda is a Nazi organization. Esq. There is a strong Nazi movement . Finally. both Portugal and to some degree Spain have had fascist regimes which are. the whole thing took the type of planning. With all due respect. but I don’t think so. although Moslems from the Middleast were clearly involved. where are these Nazi’s coming from? Some might naively think that the Nazi movement is a thing of the past. Fejfar. as the saying goes. like Opus Dei. where did Al Queda come from? My argument is that apparently. “The Boys from Brasil?” This factual book was about the strong Nazi Party presence in Brasil resulting from the fact that so many German Nazi’s escaped Europe at the end of World War II and secretly emmigrated to Brasil and some other South American countries. and have been sympathetic to Nazi Germany. we ask ourselves. So. Fejfar Sometimes. and organization one does not typically associate with the middle eastern mind. After the 9/11 debacle. truth is stranger than fiction. there is a significant Nazi Party presence in Russia. Now. Remember the book. analytic thought.. First of all.Chapter 15 1 Is Al Queda a Nazi Terrorist Organization? By Anthony J. Next. J.D. There are elected officials in Russia who openly belong to the Nazi Party.

Finally. In my view. were not only sympathetic to the Nazi Party. Al Queda is a Nazi Terrorist Organization and it would appear that Opus Dei provides the financial support for the Nazi Party and Al Queda. Food for thought. I have read books about reincarnation which state that most Nazi’s who died in World War II are now reincarnating in the United States and presumably would provide support for a new Nazi Party movement if they followed the patterns of their last lives. it is widely understood that the Arab Moslems during World War II. it would not be surprising to find many middle east Moslems who are Al Queda Nazi’s. . Additionally. the original of Aq Queda has been solved. Thus.in East Germany. but joined it.

not by Franco’s fascist party. or food bank. but ends up in Nazi Party coffers in Portugal. Now..Chapter 16 1 Is Opus Dei a Nazi Front Organization? By Anthony J. it is very difficult to track down concrete facts about Opus Dei. then it makes sense. For example. Instead of helping the poor. what if Opus Dei is dedicated to . J. What better way to fill Nazi Swiss bank accounts with American money than to tell naive Catholics that they should give all their money away to the “poor. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. there are also rumors of rumors of information which depict Opus Dei as anything but Christian.D. But. or anything else. but by the Nazi Party. Of course there is the Opus Dei of the movie the Da Vinci Code which may be real to some extent. if Opus Dei is in fact Nazi. one hears rumors and second hand information. Fejfar One hears quite a bit about Opus Dei these days.. I have heard that Opus Dei is a movement dedicated to helping the poor. What if Opus Dei is really a Nazi front organization dedicated to destroying the Catholic Church and its social justice movement? Now. What if it all started a little earlier than that. Instead. This seems a little bit odd for an ultra conservative organization. though? Perhaps.” vial Opus Dei. Fejfar. Opus Dei was founded in next door Portugal in the early 1930's. But. Esq. or Brasil? I personally have never heard of an Opus Dei street mission. what if the money does not go to help the poor. But the Opus Dei that I have heard about is the Opus Dei that was founded during Generalissimo Franco’s fascist regime in Spain in the late 1930's. Switzerland. just prior to World War II.

and what it does with its money. destroying their careers? What if it has gotten to the point that an Opus Dei psychiatrist will diagnose a spiritual person with Bipolar disorder or Schizo-affective disorder and then try to force that person into athiestic materialist apostacy in order to get out of psychiatric confinement? What if there is a deliberate effort to then persecute mental health patients. .exterminating the poor? What if Opus Dei is using psychiatry to put progressive and spiritual Catholics in psychiatric wards. it must come clean and tell us what its real mission is. driving them into the street or into suicide? If Opus Dei is a legitimate organization.

J. to the detriment of everyone else.Chapter 17 Is the Green Party in Germany the Nazi Party Of the Future? By Anthony J. Now. it would not be much of a world if we all had But. an American revolutionary. Protecting Nature is the most important thing.. said. My problem is that I think that the Green Party has the potential to be totalitarian. “Give me liberty or give me death. individual rights but no air to breath. even more important than individual rights. Fejfar The Green Party is a pro-environmental political party which originated in Germany. It would be horrible. Non- . I know that I wouldn’t. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. who can argue with that? Patrick Henry. Here is my argument. Esq. The basic platform of the Green Party is that Nature should be our number one value. in fact. I am pro-environment as a liberal democrat but I just can’t get myself to join or support the Green Party. Nazi Germany came to power in large part because Adolph Hitler argued for the racial supremacy of Aryan Germans. on the other hand. Now.D.. Fejfar. granted.” I’m not sure I would want to live in an environmentally “perfect” world with no liberty.

couln’t all non Green Party Members (read non Nazi Party Members) be executed for the sake of population control? What’s to stop this? Food for thought.Aryan Germans ended up in concentration camps. or were murdered all in the name of racial supremacy. Undoubtedly the Green Party supports population control as many pro-environmentalists do. labor camps. Could this happen with the Green Party? Perhaps. . With no individual rights to protects us.

inspection. Only the ordinary law schools ever received an A. and all that is left is a fascist dictatorship. If Law is an illusion then it soon became apparent at “top” law schools that Constitutional Law was an illusion as well. it is widely known that attendance is not taken at top ten law schools.A. Karl Marx. were seen as delusional. Esq.. The whole thing is ridiculous. the Rule of Law is gone. were ignored. Of course this had been true for awhile anyway.D. those who argued that individual rights and due process are important. What rules there were. No one goes to class. So. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. B. it also began to disappear from . It all started when the American Bar Association stopped regulating law schools. in the Communist Manifesto asserted that Law is an illusion and the only real forces in society are economic forces.B. As soon as the Constitution disappeared from law schools. Soon. J. It is law school without school. for example.Chapter 18 Law School: An Oxymoron An Allegory By Anthony J. The “top” law schools are never inspected.A. even though the entire common law is based in the first instance on property law. Fejfar.. Fejfar This is an allegorical tale about a world in which law school has ceased to exist. As soon a Property was gone. In fact. Because Karl Marx said private property was evil in the Communist Manifesto.. “top” law schools stopped requiring that Property be taken as a class. The first assault on the Rule of Law came when top ten law schools stopped having a required course in Property law. the final and most decisive blow was to make Constitutional Law an elective which most students did not bother taking.

Sadly.the Courts. . Constitutional Democracy and the Rule of Law were murdered without a shot even being fired.

sometimes the client is poor. Esq. or a kid’s baseball game. On one view. Fejfar. B. Sometimes the case is simply interesting. and suddenly casual conversation turns into the other person’s hunt for free legal advice. Unfortunately lawyers can now be held liable for malpractice in some situations where. again arguing that the lawyer had a duty to give reasonable representation and didn’t. above. Two.. a Court can hold that the lawyer had a duty to give the conversation partner reasonably correct advice. sometimes Pro Bono clients don’t like the lawyer or the work he is doing and sue for malpractice. Law practice is hard enough dealing with Ethics Rules without having to think about malpractice on top of that. that the lawyer should be exempt from being sued for legal malpractice.D. A thoughtful lawyer might say a word or two without doing any legal research. Lawyers sometimes take on cases Pro Bono.A. come to mind. that is without charging a fee. or Pro Bono work. in my opinion.. and second. When you stop and . a lawyer can create an attorney-client relationship without even knowing it. thus committed malpractice. In any event. Pro Bono work. The other situation which I would like to discuss is that of lawyer charity. or a bar. or really thinking it through. off the cuff advice. and the pro bono case. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. In this situation. This can happen when a lawyer goes to a party. and didn’t. first Cocktail Party. it is not appropriate.. Fejfar Lawyers hate legal malpractice even more than their clients. sometimes the reason is political or jurisprudential. but the conversation partner “client” then “relies” on this advice and it turn out to be incomplete or wrong.Chapter 19 Limiting Lawyer Malpractice By Anthony J. the cocktail party advice. J. I would like to argue that in both situations.

Unless the lawyer is being paid. I argue that where there is no consideration paid by the “client” there is no duty on the lawyers part other than to practice in conformance with the Ethics Rules.think about it. Of course damages in tort can exceed the contractual amount paid. . but the real duty placed on the lawyer is done so by reason of a contract supported by consideration. the real idea underlying professional negligence is that there is a duty that is created by reason of a contract for professional services. the lawyer should not be liable for legal malpractice.

One might say then that if one builds up enough virtually unconditioned judgments of fact. and judges or reflect that some thing is or is not probably true. and Thomas Aquinas. is only virtually real. Aristotle. Some call Lonergan a Critical Realist. Lonergan spends a great deal of time discussing statistical probability. Esq. I build upon Lonergan’s work in a number of respects. Insight..” Here one finds the de facto real. while Lonergan was sympathetic to the idea of evolution.” In his book. First. Lonergan did not reconcile evolution with classical philosophy. Lonergan did not reconcile his notion of statistical probability with the classical view.. In my work dealing with Critical Thomist philosophy.” While Lonergan was obviously sympathetic to Plato. . moves to understanding. If one is so sure that one’s probable judgment of fact is correct. If one finds that one’s understanding or judgment was incorrect. Such a judgment. Similarly. then this becomes a “”virtually unconditioned judgment of fact. Lonergan point out that one begins with experience. one simply revises one’ judgment. Lonergan argued that we know much of reality through what he called a “probable judgment of fact. however.D. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. J. one might in a sense create a world of “virtual reality.Chapter 20 Lonergan and Critical Thomism By Anthony J. The beauty of Lonergan is that his epistemology is fallible. some call him a Transcendental Thomist. it is not actually real. Fejfar Bernard Lonergan’s philosophical work has been described in various ways. Fejfar.

accidental cause etc. I argue that evolution is structured in part through such classical concepts as substantial form. Similarly. . material form. While Lonergan obviously was influenced by classical philosophy he was not able to reconcile his new Critical Realist philosophy with classical thought. A statistical divergence from a classical rule in Lonergan.My Critical Thomism does both. accident. or logical accident in my Critical Thomist work. is known as an illiteration.

. J. Joe Scanlon was an intuitive kid. Fejfar. a type of hypnosis. not the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). his NCA mentor began working with Joe’s unconscious Joe was taught to be a “sleeper agent” on behalf of the mind using psychic abilities. He was told about aspects of American and European History that the general public was not aware of. In fact. His mind.. Growing up in the midwest United States. the charter of the CIA specifically prohibits CIA agents from spying domestically in the United States. He was also taught the basic principles of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Sometimes an NCA agent would come and get him out of class and give him training.D. Fejfar Joe Scanlon works for the National Counterintelligence Agency (NCA). Finally.Chapter 21 1 Mind Control: An Allegory A work of Fiction By Anthony J. his consciousness was gifted with intuition from child birth. during the Kennedy administration. at the height of the cold war. Although it is not widely known. the NCA is responsible for domestic espionage in the United States. Joe took an ESP test given by the NCA in his preschool class and was recruited . Esq. . always hypnotizing him to consciously forget the training session afterwards. When Joe was 3 years old.

most of his training began to done psychicly in his sleep. grocery store. are we channeling together?” Joe kept teaching at the law school and soon discovered that he was channeling the Dean. finishing at the top of his class. Gradually. That is.United States government and the NCA in his own country. At age 40. but it definitely happened. Joe majored in management in undergraduate school and then went to law school. Most of the beings he met internally were vicious and uncooperative. On a conscious level. the Vice-Dean. the faculty. and After two years of inner work he began to channel ordinary people at the . It happened. in the case of a coup attempt against the government. “hey. it appeared to him that he was finally having some sort of real time effect. While Joe kept his mouth shut. Regina soon left his conscious mind and he began to meet other persons on the astral plane in his mind’s eye. no one ever came up to him and said. Joe did not even know that he was an NCA operative. Joe received an intuitive message that he was to undergo two nights without sleep in order to break through to his unconscious mind and begin pychic channeling. but no real time response. and his students. After two nights without sleep he was suddenly internally dialoging with an aspect of himself called Regina. He worked for a few years in a medium size law firm in the midwest and then got a job on the east coast as a law professor. Joe got married and had two children. at first. Joe figured that he was channeling these people “just out of frame” in a parallel universe. For example. He had all sorts of interesting coversations with people. Vice-Dean. He didn’t know this consciously. Joe got activated by the NCA. internally. it was channeled to him that the Dean.

the real mission of Opus Dei was to destroy the intellectual. and social justice wings of the Catholic church to further the agenda of the totalitarian Nazi Party. at Langley. While the naive underlings at Opus Dei were told that the mission of Opus Dei was to “restore” Papal authority in the Church. Finally. with some connections with the Cuban KGB. Joe discovered that Opus Dei and Al Queda were using psychic abilities in combination with Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Based upon channeled information. Virginia. About this time Joe began channeling the NCA watch desk. Joe was able to determine that Opus Dei was a Nazi front organization and the Al Queda was a Nazi terrorist organization. . in order to brain wash Americans and use mind control on them to convert them to the Nazi cause.most of faculty were Opus Dei. CIA headquarters. he was reporting information psychically to the NCA at Langley. spiritual. Al Queda. Soon.

rationalists.. according to Lonergan. not on the level of understanding as the idealist. To the experience of the observer. Fejfar. Bernard Lonergan presents his basic epistemological stance. B.” found in Second Collection (1967)(Imprimautur and Nihil obstat) (the Good House Keeping Seal of Approval of the Catholic Church). understanding. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.. Fejfar Although I have discussed Lonergan’s Cogntional Structure before.D. it is such an important topic that I thought I would touch on it again. In his Essay. and try to “bracket at preconceptions and let the thing (body) speak for itself. to bracket or give up all meaning categories. not simply through an undifferentiated idea of wisdom or intuition. takes place not on the level of empirical consciousness as the empiricists and some logical positivists would have us believe.. as some others might have us believe. Knowing.Chapter 22 Lonergan’s Cognitional Structure By Anthony J. Esq. as some other logical positivists would have use believe. intuitive judgment and reflection. On the level of experience knowing is much like Philosopher Husserl would have us believe when we institute the Epoche.” It is possible if one puts one’s mind in a trance state. Another example of experience is produced when considering the experiment of placing a straight stick into a glass tank of water. the . in order to have any conscious understanding of experience at all. we must institute the Epoche. In fact. using phenomenological method.A. Jesuit Philosopher. but rather through the threefold interrelated structure of experience. J. “Cognitional Structure. This would be much like an infant’s mind who is trying to understand his or her world before having the gift of language.

even though our sense impressions. Intuition can also be developed or increased through the use of meditation and the receipt of the Holy Eucharist at Mass. blatantly false at worst. even though it looks crooked. Although Lonergan did not discuss it. we can hypothesize that the stick is really straight. it is clear that level three consciousness involves the intuitive functions of judgment and reflection. or experience. All real art. we must become Intuitive Mystics. Intuition is a natural gift of the Spirit. tells us otherwise. comes from Intuition. we can critically judge that the stick is straight and not crooked. This experiment shows us that Logical Positivism as a philosophy is flawed at best. Intuition serves us much better than Omniscience. new philosophy.stick looks crooked. has the appearance of being crooked. bending light in such a way that the stick. new theology. as the result of an optical illusion. by way of visual sense impression. The water acts as a prism. and new inventions. On the level of understanding. Insight on the levels of both understanding and judgment comes from Intuition. poetry. If we wish to be successful and to really be Lonerganians. . On the level of judgment.

Chapter 231 Motivation and Self-Transcendence By Anthony J. Fejfar, J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar Abraham Maslow, in his work on management and work motivation, states that the highest level of motivation is that of “Self-Actualization.” highest level of motivation is that of Self-Transcendence. In his Book, “Motivation and Personality,” Abraham Maslow describes the levels of motivation that humans have based on human needs: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Physiological Needs Safety Needs Belongingness Needs Esteem Needs Self-Actualization Needs I, on the other hand, argue that the

Thus, the most basic need for a human being is food, clothing, shelter, etc. Next, is the need to be safe from attack or natural disaster. Next, is the need to belong. Next is the need to have selfesteem, or to feel good or positive about what one has accomplished. Finally, there is the need to selfactualize. The need to self-actualize is the need to actualize meaningful projects in one’s life. But, I argue there is at least one more level of Need, and Motivation, that is, Self-Transcendence. Thus, the scale of needs is as follows:

1. Physiological Safety Needs 2. Belongingness Needs 3. Esteem Needs 4. Self-Actualization Needs 5. The Need for Self-Transcendence Jesuit Philosopher Bernard Lonergan argues in his work that humans have a need for SelfTranscendence. This means that one must move beyond the ego to the Self, and, then, Transcend with the Self. The Self is the Spiritual aspect of the person. Thus, Self-transcendence means that one transcends the ego with the Self and chooses higher Spiritual Values. I argue that this, level, SelfTranscendence, is the Highest Level of Human Motivation, and that Maslow’s work needs to be revised.

Chapter 24 Natural Law and Music By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar Some people doubt the existence of Natural Law. Some go as far as to say that believing in Natural Law is delusional. Typically, we think of Natural Law as applying in such areas as Ethics or Morality. But in fact, Natural Law applies across a wide spectrum of human activity. One such area is Music. Now, you may not know it, but Music has a Natural Law Mathematical structure to it. The tones and octaves of Music can be represented Mathematically. In fact, during the Medieval period in Europe, Royals and the Nobility were tutored in Music by learning the Mathematics of Music first, before learning to play a musical instrument. Some composers of Music also understand the Natural Law Mathematics of Music and use this knowledge in writing new Music. Now, you may not have really understood the point here. A carved flute, a set of drums with tones, a strung guitar of wood, all can be made my human hands and played, and, the Music which comes out of each of these instruments, magically, so to speak, can be understood and represented Mathematically. Thus, it is clear, by reason of this proof, that Natural Law Music inheres naturally in the very state of Reality itself, prior to any human understanding of it. This, of course, applies by analogy in other areas of human endevour.

Catholic Social Justice advocates. What started happening is this. I guess people started forgetting about World War II and I guess they started not believing in the United States Constitution. they started recruiting them. Nazis started coming to the United States from Brazil. And I guess that these people are basically bullies and cowards. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. During that time period you could basically figure that blacks and jews were in the Democratic Party and were anti-Nazi. Spiritually Catholic people. who would be? Answer. and. Maybe only 20 or 30 years ago. Catholic liberal democrats.. Fejfar. The problem was of course that if the jews and the blacks were not to be the Nazi victims. Nazis joining with jewish and black Nazis to form a new fascist political alliance. So we have white Aryan.Chapter 25 Nazi Dupes A Political Allegory By Anthony J. Fejfar There once was a time when you knew you could count on certain things. But then something happened. Esq. instead of going after blacks and jews like you might expect.. Portugal and East Germany.. J. That time was not that long ago.A. The Nazi pogrom was getting underway when the Catholic realized what was happening and put an end to it. B. .D. Hispanic Catholics (non Cuban) and the mentally ill. presumably German.

D. Some go to Oblivion voluntarily. wishing the worst for all who live there. Oblivion acts immediately back to make my world the worst of all possible worlds for me. For example. B. as one acts in relation to reality. J. everyone is forced to be reciprocal. others will love and help me. then I will be murdered and tortured. Esq. then that is what I will find for both myself and others in Oblivion. and SelfTranscendence or Compassion for myself and others. if I enter Oblivion with a negative attitude. What does this mean? It means that automatically. Fejfar.” It is located outside of Space-Time. On the other hand. . reality.A. then in Oblivion. if one enters Oblivion with a Positive Attitude. reciprocally. then. acts back upon the person in a similar way..Chapter 26 Oblivion An Allegorical Tale By Anthony J. In Oblivion. If I go into Oblivion with the attitude of trying to Murder and Torture everyone there.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and some are banished to Oblivion. If I enter Oblivion with the idea of loving and helping Others. then Oblivion will produce positive things for me. If I enter oblivion with the idea of autonomy for myself and others. Fejfar There is a place called “Oblivion. Self-Actualization for myself and others. Oblivion is a Place where the entire World of Oblivion is structured by the Metaphysical Quiddity of Reciprocity. and immediately.. Rational Self Interest for myself and others.

If you are negative you will find Hell. de facto. be careful. and if you are positive. you will find Heaven. .So. if you are ever offered Oblivion here. de facto. or in the hereafter.

Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. John Doe spends 2 months on a psychiatric ward for having “dangerous ideas. but in fact this is probably the only way that John Doe will avoid spending the rest of his life in . What is the forensic psychiatrist to do in this situation? Well.” and then at the time of his discharge. Psychiatry. J. can help to end the “frame” of a criminal defendant. John Doe writes a political column where he makes fun of the local govenor for being corrupt. Fejfar While I have sometimes been critical of psychiatry in the past.. After the transfer. John Doe spends 20 days in jail and then is transferred to a forensic psychiatric ward for evaluation of judicial competency to stand trial. involuntarily committed to a psychiatric ward. Fejfar. John Doe is a political columnist for a local newspaper. and charged criminally with aggrevated assault on a police officer. Here’s how it works. is arrested off the ward. John Doe complains to the forensic psychiatrist that he has been “framed” by the police and prosecutor on false charges.. this may seem unfair. and that the cop and prosecutor made the whole thing up. interestingly enough. John Doe thinks that he has the protection of free speech and freedom of the press under the United States Constitution.Chapter 27 Psychiatry and Justice By Anthony J.A.” Now. Soon after this. Esq.D. John Doe is arrested. I would like to point out one instance where psychiatry helps promote justice. John Doe insists that he never committed aggrevated assault. what he does is to diagnose John Doe with schizo-affective disorder for having the “delusion” of being “framed.. and then later charged criminally with aggrevated assault for alledgedly hitting the cop who arrested him on the original involuntary commitment. B.

one way or the other in order for this technique to work. The psychiatrist presumes John Doe to be delusional about the frame. and this is precisely what makes John Doe judicially incompetent to stand trial at the time of trial. . The psychiatrist really doesn’t even have to believe John Doe. Whether he knows it or not.prison as a result of the frame. the psychiatrist is a hero.

seemed a . J. I argue that Purgatory best represents the real Nature of Reality and that both Heaven and Hell are antiquated concepts. just waiting for the perfect relationship. Interestingly.. and Hell as Heaven. So. Obviously. Then there is Hell. Since about 1960. Others think that this would be boring and not Heaven.D. even some Satanist think that they will be going to Heaven. First let us talk about Heaven. they define evil as good. They are so deluded that they think that they will go to Heaven for being evil.. or so. as good as evil. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. entertainment.. etc. The idea that a Good God would leave a person in Hell forever. most people come to the more sensible conclusion that good people go the Heaven and evil people go to Hell. Fejfar. suffering torture. Fejfar Once upon a time a lot of people believed in Heaven and Hell.Chapter 28 Purgatory and the Nature of Reality By Anthony J. B. Hell has become an increasingly unpopular concept. What is the nature of Heaven? What is Heaven like? Well. and that Heaven will be filled with great food. Others think that there will be no sex at all in Heaven and that beautiful people will not be allowed in. Esq..A. many people believed in Purgatory. and Heaven as Hell. Some think that we will spend eternity in heaven going to church and praying. with a suitable number of beautiful women (or men) of the opposite sex. and of course. Even longer ago in time. These are extremely irrational people who think that anything can mean anything. in point of fact there is no agreement. Some think that Heaven is like Paradaise.

in the old view. On the other hand. never quite “getting it. this began to fade. Once in Purgatory. there were always conceptual problems with Hell. Obviously. the idea was that you spent time in Purgatory before you could go to Heaven. or something else. if one was Satanically evil. they try to find the Spirit in other religious traditions. both cannot be true. then. the problem was that Satan was in charge in Hell. Somehow.little bit extreme. my Protestant friend might think I was going to Hell for not being a “Born Again” Christian. that is. Many Catholics and Protestants are ecumenical.” Now. The last problem with Hell is ecumenism. This was especially true when there were children of mixed Protestant Catholic marriages. not Satan. after ecumenism. it is generally thought that Satan tempts people to be evil on Earth. and instead what exists is something like Purgatory. there is Purgatory. and I. then obviously a person in Hell is not separated from him. Purgatory is a place for education. even in the old view. if they ever did. But. many of us cheated. some contemporary theologians define Hell as the complete separation from God. So people soon either tried to redefine Hell. So. Purgatory is defined as a place which is conducive to Spiritual Growth. But. I guess it was possible that some would spend a very long time in Purgatory. instead one is being punished by him. and Spiritual . you could not go to Hell. or to define it out of existence. In fact. Perhaps he might reward you for being evil. It’s hard for a kid to think that one of his parents was going to Hell for being in the wrong religion. If God is in charge in Hell. Where before. it only makes sense that people are punished in Hell if God is in charge in Hell. Satan is considered to be evil. In fact. reflection. his Catholic friend might think that he was going to Hell for missing Mass on Sunday. In the old view. Additionally. If you were truly evil then you went to Hell. Finally. praying for a friend or relative who was in the “wrong” religion. I would like to argue that Heaven and Hell no longer exist. then one might ask why Satan would torture you in Hell.

Recall. I argue that Reincarnation is ordered toward personal growth. Those who are in sync with this paradigm find Purgatory to be Heavenly. Newton describes a Spirit World which is ordered toward spiritual and intellectual growth.” on the bottom end.Growth. this Purgatory. and those who are not. Purgatory is a Spirit World which is based upon the paradigm of spiritual and intellectual growth. One might argue that Purgatory ranges from “Virtual Heaven” on the top end. by psychologist Michael Newton. If we do not learn our lessons in the Spirit World. then you are going to find Purgatory to be a difficult place to be. then. It is this World. Journey of Souls. In his book. You see. Perhaps. Hell only exists for those who reject the existence of Purgatory. it would seem that the notion of a “Perfect” Heaven is not logical. that we return to between lives on Earth. . to “Virtual Hell. then we must learn them on Earth in later lives. if you spend all your time on Earth being antiintellectual and anti-spiritual. Since spiritual growth can go on forever. find it to be Hellish. and for no others. at this point the notion of Reincarnation. both spiritually and intellectually.

After giving it some thought. . it makes sense that it could shift its structure and manifest as a wave rather than a particle. the problem raised above... What I remember is that Sunlight acts both as a Wave and as a Particle.A. B. How is it that Sunlight can have both a particle and a wave function? My answer is this. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. No atoms. Esq. certainly no cells. here is the explanation that I am proposing. just Photons which are subatomic particles. I am going to argue that all Sunlight is composed of Photon subatomic particles. Fejfar When I was a undergraduate student at Creighton University. This was an anomaly that the professor could not explain. J. Since the Quanta subatomic particle is a chameleon particle. I had a physics class in which we studied the properties of light. now.. This hypothesis seems to confirmed by the very nature of Sunlight itself. First of all.D. I argue that each Photon subatomic particle is really a Quanta subatomic particle. Under the Unified Quantum Field Theory which I have developed. But. Fejfar. no molecules.Chapter 29 Quantum Physics and Sunlight By Anthony J.

Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. It is a Love which is ordered toward higher things.D. Esq. Fejfar Some philosophers have equated Reason with Rationality. There are human beings. that the type of Love involved is parental love. Erickson argues that Reason is composed of both an affective element... It is intellectual love. Love. Fejfar..A. Because there is an affective element to Reason it is not as coldly objective as rationality itself. A Reasonable person can compromise and a Reasonable person can feel compassion. that is. however. . who love logic.Chapter 30 Reason and Higher Love By Anthony J. This point is made by Developmental Psychologist. The Love of Logic is a Higher Love. Erik Erikson. typically philosophers or lawyers. that is. In fact. They love the beauty of a logical syllogism and the beauty of logic itself. is 90% logic and 10% love (of logic). the two are not the same. Erikson is mistaken in saying. Logic. I would argue that the Love involved with Reason is in fact intellectual Love. then. Reason. A Rational person typically does not compromise and does not feel compassion. B. or the Love of Logic. This is why Reason is superior to Rationality. J. and a rational element. Instead.

One of the toughest things in life is deciding whether or not to believe in reincarnation. You then prepare to come to Earth for you next life.Chapter 31 Reincarnational Estoppel: An Allegory By Anthony J. . And. or Purgatory. All of this in spite of the First Amendment protection that all of us are supposed to have for religious or philosophical beliefs. what type of body you will have. that after death in a given life. Now. one suspects. B. ensouling your body between the 6 month and 9th month of your mother’s pregnancy. forever.A. some of us take it one step further and do everything we can to persecute those who do believe in reincarnation by trying to kick them out of the Church. Esq. there is another story out there. typically. Hell. Fejfar Life is tough. Fejfar.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.. who your parents will be. There is no doubt about it. Many in our society are taught that reincarnation is a false doctrine and because of this do not believe in reincarnation. what country you will live in. and. one’s Soul goes not to Heaven. what you learned and what you didn’t learn. and it goes something like this. but instead to someplace like Purgatory. not exactly.D. The idea of reincarnation. is. No second chances. looking at what you did right or wrong. or put them in jail. and for your next life. In this Spirit World.. one first has a life review of one’s immediate past life. not too much fun. You die and then your Eternal Soul goes to Heaven. You spend part of your time selecting where you will live. of course. which is typically thought of as a Spirit World. No going back to Earth. that each of us has a Eternal Soul. J. etc. You are then placed with a Soul Group where you spend time studying. not to Hell. in general. Here is the problem. or put them on a psychiatric ward. Even more so.

and even more so. . Under the Doctrine of Reincarnational Estoppel. is estopped in Equity from reincarnating. is now gone forever.Which brings up the last point here. In this sense the old person that was. the Doctrine of Reincarnational Estoppel. and then is forced to reincarnate under the supervision of Spirit Guides or Archangels. one who persecutes others for believing in reincarnation. Instead the person spends some time in Heaven. that is. Hell. or Purgatory and then gets a “mind wash” forgetting all past life experience and identity. one who denies reincarnation.

. to help bring the project into existence. actualize means to make something happen. Self-Actualization can be defined at a person’s attempt to actualize projects which that person finds meaningful. The projects which the self-actualizing person attempts to implement.” The person must actualize a project. So. in his work on management and work motivation. creativity. Hatred and other base or negative emotions have no place in self-actualization.D. but it is more than that. Finally.” Maslow spends a great deal of time describing what self-actualizing people do when working. positive intentionality. Fejfar Abraham Maslow. Fejfar. Self-Actualization only takes place in the context of a project which the . intelligence and reason. Not someone else. states that the highest level of motivation is that of “Self-Actualization. but does not spend a great deal of time discussing exactly what Self-Actualization is. are projects which that person finds meaningful. Esq. J. In the first instance. The second aspect of Self-Actualization is the notion of “actualization. To actualize means to use love. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.Chapter 32 1 Self-Actualization By Anthony J. you! Your meaning. attentiveness.. the first thing we can say about Self-Actualization is that it is existential in nature.

The above.person is trying to implement. The intelligent parent and manager should keep the above in mind when attempting to motivate a child or employee to work. then describes Self-Actualization. Self-Actualization is practical. Self-Actualizing people work on something. Without a project or projects Self-Actualization is impotent and only partial in nature. .

it is apparent that Consciousness. Being holds all forms in place as Form of Form.Chapter 33 Seth. and that the ideas which Creatively Flow from Consciousness are the basis for structuring and creating our Reality. can these two views of the fundamental nature of reality be reconciled? In point of fact. Esq. on the other hand.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. I. I suppose. is the integration of Being. somehow. I imagine that if we had to pick one of the three. for Seth. . Substance is a metaphysical quiddity which involves Absolute Relationality. Seth argues that the ultimate nature of Reality is Consciousness. How then. it is apparent that the metaphysical trinity that I have described performs the same function as Consciousness. Fejfar In the Seth books by Jane Roberts. Fejfar. that Consciousness. which creatively produces forms or ideas which structure reality. J. for Seth. and Critical Thomism By Anthony J. for Seth. and Substance. Critical Thomist realism and Sethian idealism are reconciled. Logos involves Creative Form. Consciousness. Finally. Thus. Logos. that Substance itself is the same as Consciousness is Seth’s system.A.D. Love and Truth. Thus.. God the Son (Logos). in many ways parallels the trinity that I have described above.. and God the Holy Spirit (Substance). have argued that reality flows from the tripartite function of God the Father (Being). B.

A. If it can be said that relationality is a feminine virtue. What is the Absolute? The Absolute is Absolute Relationality. as Substance is Absolute Relationality. Fejfar. the Holy Spirit. the Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom is the Holy Spirit as Feminine. Only Intuition or Mysticism can really understand this. then it seems to me that the Holy Spirit is in many respects a feminine Spirit. As I have argued before..” What then can we say about the Holy Spirit in more philosophical terms? Well. the mobility of God is found primarily in the Substance of the Holy Spirit. Bergson argued that the highest reality principle was the Absolute. The Holy Spirit. but this is it. Fejfar Philosopher Henri Bergson argues that the ultimate nature of reality is mobility. Absolute Relationality.. then. As it says in the Book of Wisdom in the Catholic Bible. it makes sense then that the antidote to relativism is Absolute Relationality where all aspects of reality are related to simultaneously so that an Absolute which transcends relativism manifests. J. Esq.Chapter 34 Substance and the Holy Spirit By Anthony J. and I think it can. Because the ultimate nature of reality is probabilistic and relative. is Truth. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. the Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom is “mobile mobility. and Love.. Substance.D. then. I argue that when it comes to God. B. .

lending money at interest. the tenant’s estate was considered to be a non- freehold interest which was governed by common law property law in the law courts. Fejfar The origins of the modern lease are obscure. and lease the land from the landlord noble for less than fair market value as a way of collecting interest. Fejfar. Instead of a loan with interest. The tenant should be seen as receiving an equitable estate or equitable use from the landlord so that equity courts can intervene on behalf of tenants against the more powerful landlords. B.D. that is. and the discount to the tenant lender was the equivalent of interest. the lease was transformed from the lender tenant situation to what we normally expect. a lease from a financially successful landlord to a tenant with little money. equity did not. Soon.. Instead. It is time that the medieval rule governing leases should change.. Historians have argued that the lease was originally a vehicle used by usurious money lenders in medieval England to avoid the ecclesiastical and equitable prohibition against usury.. that is. however. that the equity courts would not intervene to protect tenants rights. It is said that because the earliest tenants were really usurious lenders. but because of the usurious origins of the lease. J. . the lender would become the tenant of a noble with land.Chapter 35 The Lease as an Equitable Use By Anthony J. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. The rent was in essence the loaned money.A. One would expect that equity would intervene to help the poor tenant. Esq.

Chapter 36 1 The Christ Child By Anthony J.. Baptism is Magic.D. Fejfar. Fully God. Fejfar In eastern and pagan religions there is the god known as the Eternal Child. they also have the supernatural benefit of Baptism. the Eternal Child is the Christ Child. Cradle Catholic kids get both barrels of the Holy Spirit at an early age. especially cradle Catholics. are kids who are baptized Catholic in infancy and raised Catholic.. I have read books by various authors who all agree that spirit guides or angels work with us in our sleep to help us. I argue that this process takes place for Cradle Catholic kids in a very intense way. Esq. J. fully human. the Angels and Archangels in the Soul and consciousness of the newly Baptized baby. Cradle Catholic kids. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Baptism places all the Holy Archetypes of all the Saints. Not only do they experience Christmas and the Nativity during the magical play stages of childhood. I would not be surprised if the Gospels themselves were not magically etched upon the souls of the newly . For Catholics. and fully kid. by the way.

I can only say that with Catholic Reincarnation. The Cradle Catholic kid of age two. (out of body experience). to really get it. . Moreover. shifting his or her soul or astral body into Heaven where he or she plays with the Christ Child as is taught many secrets of Catholic Wisdom. in his or her sleep has an OBE.baptized. every Cradle Catholic kid has the Christ Child as his or her primary teacher. you will have to try another life born as a Cradle Catholic. For those converts who are not Cradle Catholics.

it is possible that a lawyer will recover hundreds of thousands of dollars in a given case. the ethics rules prohibit a lawyer from loaning money to a client on the theory that this creates a conflict of interest. is there anything that we could come up with which would take the best of the contingent fee and the .. and 40% of any recovery which takes place on appeal or as a result of an appeal. Contingent Fee lawyers argue that this system is just because they don’t always win every case. and very successful too. Fejfar.Chapter 37 The Contingent Loan for Attorney’s Fees and Expenses By Anthony J. Fejfar In Europe. The typical contingent fee agreement provides that the attorney will receive a percentage of any recovery that the client receives from the opposing party in litigation. while in the United States.A. The problem is. that some contingent fee lawyers are very good at what they do. B. In order to make up for the loss in a losing case. and the money recovered on behalf of the client. Esq. this situation. the lawyer gets what appears to be a large windfall in a winning case. The idea is that it all evens out. In lawsuits where a large amount of damages are alleged. Traditional financing is difficult to come by for the ordinary client. however. J. Contingent Fees to Attorney’s in Plaintiff’s civil cases are fairly common. if the case is won. Some argue too much. the lawyer receives 25% of any recovery which takes place before trial.. 33% of any recovery which takes place during or as a result of trial. Given. and. They only take “winning” cases and when they win they get paid handsomely. Contingent Fees are thought to be immoral.D. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Another way of financing a case in litigation is for the client to barrow money. Traditionally..

Expenses are also reimbursed from the Client’s Lawyer Trust Fund Account.000 business loss on its income tax return. Additionally.000 as a Contingent Loan for Attorney’s Fees and Expenses. in a typical case. This is like a contingent fee because the obligation to repay is contingent upon the client’s recovery of money in a lawsuit. I also argue that this way of financing civil litigation would be economically efficient. So. There really is no more conflict of interest for a lawyer than there would be with an ordinary contingent fee. a bank or a law firm. I argue that this new litigation financing vehicle is ethical and legal. The only way the Client is ever personally liable for the amount loaned is if the Client fires the Lawyer prior to the conclusion of the case. where repayment of the loan is contingent upon the client recovering money in a lawsuit. But the amount of the contingent loan is based upon the actual attorney’s fees charged and expenses incurred. or another person. against which the lawyer will bill his fee of $150 per hour. Attorney’s Firm loans Client $15. the bank or Law Firm get a premium interest rate of 25% on the principal amount per annum. This money then goes into the Lawyer Trust Fund account for the Client’s benefit. the lender bank or Law Firm will be entitled to a $15.litigation loan and form a new vehicle for financing litigation? I argue that the Contingent Loan for Attorney’s Fees and Expenses will help solve the problem. in a case where no money is recovered for the Client in the lawsuit. Because of the risk involved. A Contingent Loan for Attorney’s Fees and Expenses is a loan made by an investor. . Successful civil lawsuits end illegal freeloading by persons who break the law.

in an account which had anywhere from a couple of thousand dollars in it. at the end of every month you have to do a reconciling balance to ensure that you and the bank think that you have the same amount of money in your account. The interesting thing about a checking account is that it is remarkably like an accounting system. Fejfar.D. you have a checking account. down to about $500. J. If I were to follow the rules that I learned in my accounting classes. if you look at your check register. things are supposed to balance. the time taken to find the error might be very expensive. I would have to spend hours trying to find out why my balance was off by two or three dollars. Fejfar Although I must admit that I have only had 6 hours of accounting. I found that I was spending over $100 to correct an error which was only two or three dollars. Interestingly.. This is economically inefficient. and. in trying to balance my checkbook over the years I have found that I am typically off by a small amount of money. if the company had $3 billion budget and the . Of course it costs money to have an audit performed. the issue which confronts me with my checkbook can also confront a Certified Public Accountant. maybe only two or three dollars. Since I think that my time as a lawyer is worth at least $50 per hour. performing an audit. Esq. If you are like me.A. Once again. B. there is a column for both credits and debits. In fact..Chapter 38 The Correcting Entry: Toward a New Generally Recognized Accounting Principle By Anthony J. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.. and. if the accountant is billing hourly. Now. it may be that the idea of a little knowledge is inspiring rather than dangerous as some might think. At the end of the audit.

it does not make much sense to spend thousands of dollars in accountant time trying to correct the problem. This could be made into a Generally Acceptable Accounting Principle (GAAP) and then we could all go home at night feeling good that we had balanced the budget.” to reconcile the balance. So what do we do? I argue that where the amount involved in a balance discrepancy is de minimus relative to the overall budget or account involved. . attractivc to me as a lawyer. and have saved ourselves some time and money to boot.balance was off only by $100. you simply make a credit or debit entry in to the “adjusting entry account” in order to get the “correct” balance. is that when you are only off by a small amount. that it is perfectly acceptable to set up an “adjusting entry account. but perhaps unattractive to some accountants who desire perfection. The idea.

Annakin Skywalker. Loving everything and everyone as much as possible. Real detachment comes from love not from repression. hatred. Esq. and the Star Wars Universe. It destroys the person who hates as much as anyone else. Fejfar In Star Wars. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and Hatred. the Force takes the place of Being as the primary metaphysical concept. allowed his base emotions to control his mind rather than relying on the higher emotions. Fejfar. Instead. Annakin.Chapter 39 1 The Dark Side of the Force By Anthony J. . not Black. fails in his attempt to integrate the Dark Side of the Force during his lifetime. The secret of this is of course to stay with Gray Magic and not to stray into the realm of Black Magic. Luke Skywalker is encouraged to integrate the Dark Side of the Force. he allowed himself to develop and use Black Magic instead of Gray Magic. J. as such. Second. it is Gray Being. jeolousy. Luke’s father. The base emotions are fear.. Annakin’s failure is twofold. Annakin is overcome by the Dark Side and becomes the evil Darth Vader. without being engulfed. first.D.. one should have the attitude of love. If the Force exists. never works.

. J. instead it was right on the edge. Now. When Henry broke from Rome and started the Anglican Church.. are really Byzantine Catholic. I argue that the House of Stuart had ties to the Bohemian aristocracy and was not Anglican. so the idea of an Episcopalian Catholic Church may seem a little bit odd. not wanting to be either Roman Catholic or Anglican (The Church of England). however. Catholics in Bohemia started calling themselves Episcopalian Catholic.Chapter 40 The Episcopalian Catholic Church By Anthony J. nor Roman Catholic. Anne of Bohemia. that it takes on the name of the Episcopalian Catholic Church. I think that this first happened in the Kingdom of Bohemia. I don’t think that Bohemia was ever really part of the Roman Empire. in the East. B.D. Bohemia was Byzantine Catholic up until the time of King Henry the Eight of England. . I argue that when Anne came to England to marry Henry she brought with her tens of thousands of Bohemians from her Kingdom. You see.A. I argue that when the Byzantine Catholic Church comes West. You see. what is now part of the Czech Republic. Many people that we consider to be Eastern Orthodox Christians. I. who had for a time as his Queen. but rather Episcopalian Catholic. These Bohemians were left stranded in the British Isles after Henry divorced Anne Boleyn and started the Church of England.. Esq. it is still well known that the Byzantine Catholic Church exists. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. most people are familiar with the Episcopalian Protestant Church. Fejfar After much reflection. take the position that the Episcopalian Catholic Church has been around for quite some time. also known as Anne Boleyn. I have come to the conclusion that I am an Episcopalian Catholic. we just didn’t realize it. Fejfar. When Henry married Anne. Bohemia became part of Great Britain.

I argue that many of us are Episcopalian Catholic. but few Episcopalian Catholic Churches. These Episcopalians. even today. considered themselves Protestant with their roots in the Anglican Church not the Byzantine Catholic Church. Thus. and because they did not have sufficient numbers or political power they had to try to fit into the established categories. and joined the Episcopalian Church. they were not Roman Catholic. even though we may be formally affiliated with the Anglican Church. When the revolutionary war came. and they were not Episcopalian Protestant. the Colonists left the Anglican Church. or the Roman Catholic Church. It is time for the Episcopalian Catholic Church to develop its own identity. that is the Church of England which supported the monarchy of King George. however. They were not Anglican. prior to the revolutionary war.When Episcopalian Catholics came to the American Colonies. and now were faced with an even more interesting dilemma. . they found Anglican Churches and Roman Catholic Churches. the Episcopalian Protestant Church. More immigrants came from Bohemia and Great Britain over time to America who were Episcopalian Catholic.

which is called “the third way. where either choice involved is not particularly attractive. Rawlins then comes up with the idea of using a combat trenching shovel which he found nearby to cut off Beagle’s hand at the wrist in order to save Beagle’s life. So.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. he has no success. Esq.A. if Rawlins could find the “third way” and “think outside the box. B. Flyboys. Fejfar. Rawlins did not even try this innovative solution.” the ABA Journal. Beagle’s right hand is caught between the ground and the wing of his crashed fighter plane.Chapter 41 The Ethical Dilemma of Flyboys By Anthony J. In . Rawlins is apparently faced with an either/or situation. I watched the movie several times before it occurred to me that if the shovel was that sharp.. In the stress of the situation. however.” then maybe a better solution to the problem might present itself. Life seems to give many either/or situations to us. Either he cuts off Beagle’s hand. or he leaves him there to die from enemy shell fire. there was no reason that Rawlins could not have hacked away a piece of the aircraft wing which was trapping Beagle’s hand in place.” or sometime called.D. Rawlins. In the movie. Fejfar In the Movie.. There is another approach to this type of situation. a world war one fighter pilot is shot down and crash lands in the no-man zone between the French and German lines. another fighter pilot in Beagle’s squandron. there is a scene where Beagle. When Rawlins trys to help Beagle get Beagle’s hand loose from under the crashed aircraft. and seemingly did not even think about it. lands in the no-man zone in an attempt to rescue Beagle. J. Steve Keeva wrote about this in relation to legal practice. “thinking outside the box.

to develop the ability to be creative or intuitive under stress. etc.Creativity is a gift and it is a gift which often disappears in high stress situations. I argue that we need to train managers. then Beagle would have been able to escape with both hands intact.. If Rawlins had been able to do this. doctors. . The same is true of intution. Obviously. a better solution to the problem. If we are trying to create a better world. lawyers.

” “No.. and continue the argument. here comes the shift in ground.” Now. that’s Theosphany too. Fejfar One of the more interesting. and often unnoticed forms of arguing falsely. Let me give an example. it works like this: I start out an argument having the key word defined implicitly or explicitly as Definition A. Theosphany doesn’t really even have a definition. its not. J.” “Oh. and accuse him of Theosphany. B. (Phil. “Theosphany. Stan Smith attacks the professor. as he gets fired from his job for Theosphany. during the middle of the argument I then. “you believe in Liberation Theology. “Why do you think that I have committed Theosphany?” “Well.” Stan Smith says.” Stan Smith replies. . At a faculty meeting.Chapter 42 The Fallacy of Shifting Ground By Anthony J. Joe Farmer replies. Here is the situation. Joe Farmer. but I’ll make one up.A. Stan Smith tells everyone that Theosphany is one of the most terrible crimes there is. I am on a law faculty and one of the faculty members believes in liberation theology. “But you’re a republican you are against abortion on the basis of the Bible. the the Fallacy of Shifting Ground. shift the key word definition to Definition B. Esq.” says Joe Farmer. as far as I know. or fallaciously. that is Theosphany. Let us assume for the sake of argument that the word Theosphany means political theology. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. I’ll make up an interesting word.D. and additionally. He asks. and gets put on a psychiatric ward. that Theosphany is a serious sin. Fejfar. Joe Farmer tries to defend himself.” Now. The whole idea is not very complicated.. without really letting anyone know.). “Theospany does not include the Bible.

So. he would have asked what the logical distinction was between Theosphany as originally defined and Theosphany as later defined. or even have argued equitable estoppel against him.Now. we the audience know that the original definition of Theosphany was “political theology. . and accused Stan Smith of hippocracy. the definition was changed from that to “Political Theology not involving the Bible.” Now. Once this was done. Joe Farmer could have accused Stan Smith. if Joe Farmer knew what was going on.” Without telling anyone. of Theosphany. Joe Farmer might have been able to argue that there really is no rational basis to exclude Biblical Theology from the overall idea of Theosphany. watch out for the Fallacy of Shifting Ground.

He got fake Brazillian papers and came to the United States with a student visa. J. to at least put them in Internment Camps (Death .000 in the United States. most of the Communist Party was composed of former Nazi’s and their children. Fejfar It was 1993 and the Wall in East Germany was down. He went to law school at Harvard and soon became a law school Dean. In East Germany. They taught the gullible students. they were teaching Adolph Hitler’s book. or.D. Fejfar. They told the students that society and law and the legal profession are evil and if the students expected to succeed they had to join a Satanic Cult.. had been with the KGB since childhood. Karl Schmidt had first made his way to Nazi Portugal. he changed names. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and Spiritual Catholics. Esq. As soon as he got to the United States.. Karl Schmidt. Schmidt recruited other Bosnian and East German KGB agents and put them on the law faculty. murdered a person who looked like him. B. Soon. The KGB had a plan in place for the year 2.A. Mein Kamph to the law students without them even knowing what so going on. and took his place. and then to Nazi Brazil. but really they were still Nazis. His Father had been in the Nazi SS in Nazi Germany and had been rehabilitated into a Communist after the war. the mentally ill..Chapter 43 The Final Solution A Political Allegory By Anthony J. mostly Republicans. The called themselves Communists to appease the Russians. that the Final Solution to America’s problems was to exterminate the poor.

Camps) or in mental hospitals. . almost like Jedi Knights. They seemed to have supernatural abilities. This would be a problem. The only problem was that the Spiritual Catholics were fighting back.

As I have argued previously. One of the arguments in favor of the Great Society and the Social Welfare Net is that a culturally sophisticated person finds it distasteful to live in a world where people are starving to death. or ignorant. . Fejfar I am a Liberal. In fact. Instead of using the base emotion of selfishness to guide our decisions. each of us is entitled to have basic food. medical treatment. and I am in favor of the Social Welfare Net. if I choose to live. so it will be done unto us. and entertainment (G rated I suppose). transportation. we choose rational self interest. clothing. you are entitled to live a life where your basic human needs are met. Esq. As we do unto others. You see. Compassion aside. So. from an aesthetic point of view poverty is disgusting. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. the reincarnational system teaches us that as we sow so we shall reap. education.. The idea of the Social Welfare Net is that regardless of what income you might have.” most of us are pretty thick skinned. J... it is pretty hard to find a “bleeding heart liberal.D. which is a function of reason more than anything else. Reincarnation. and the Social Welfare Net By Anthony J. or are homeless. most of the positions that we take are based upon enlightened rational self interest. Rather than murder or force poor people into suicide. but I’m not sure. I suppose part of it has to do with compassion. shelter. B. Fejfar. in the Great Society.Chapter 44 The Great Society. Thus. I follow Kant’s idea that persons are to be each given a very high value intrinsically. the culturally sophisticated person prefers to pay the freight so that the poor can have a decent life Now. regardless of their utility to society. another reason to favor the Social Welfare Net and the Great Society is the existence of Reincarnation and Karma.A.

public or private. am purchasing “Karma Insurance” so that in any life that I might live in the future.without protest. The odds are you will end up poor. one should always try to moderate extremes in one’s culture or face the likelihood that you will be dealing with one of the extremes in a future life. in the Great Society. and the Social Welfare Net. this seems doubtful. should provide a good nutritious breakfast and lunch for every student. From a Karmactic point of view. clothing. The companies who invest the most in their employees make the most money. The Great Society is filled with Great Companies who have Great Employees working for them. as a believer in the Great Society. No child should go to school hungry and no child should go home hungry from school. I. For example. The argument is that people on welfare should not make more than a working poor person. In response. There really are not that many millionaires in America relative to the population as a whole. While you might try to gamble that you will be rich financially in most of your lives. One final objection to the Social Welfare Net is that it is impractical to put in place because of the working poor and lower middle class. there are many governmental programs open to the working poor and the middle class. Education at every level should be free or at minimal cost so that all can participate. I am not sure about that. transportation. I will be guaranteed the basics of food. etc. The Social Welfare Net and the Great Society is the rational choice. as a matter of rational self interest. Chapter 45 . in the great society all schools. Additionally. The countries that invest the most in its people do very well economically. education. my Karma for the next life will be to be a poor person in a world with no Social Welfare Net. If the job cannot pay a living wage then maybe the person is better off on welfare from an individual as well as a societal point of view. entertainment. shelter. statistically. I argue that such a world is possible and is economically efficient. in a society with no Social Welfare Net.

J. For every thing there is a form. and the Rectangle each are very basic forms. I have argued that there are metaphysical quiddities associated with each person of the Holy Trinity: God the Father God the Son God the Holy Spirit Being Logos Form of Form Unrestricted Act of Understanding Creative Form Substantial Form Reason Substance Absolute Relational Loving Truth I have also alluded to the “Fourth” person of the Trinity. For every word. the World of the Forms. Esq. The Triangle. Fejfar. all one has to do is look at geometry. there is a form.. Of course there are Fractal Forms. the World of the Immutable Platonic Forms is filled with forms. Form is what structures reality more than any other metaphysical quiddity. that is. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Form. Fejfar Previously. the Square. ... If one doubts that Form exists.A. B. as well. The metaphysical quiddity associated with the Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom is Form: Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom Form Form is one of the most important metaphysical quiddities.D. as is the substantial reality of Substantial Form. then integrates with other metaphysical quiddities at various levels of reality: Accidental Form Material Form Quantum Form Substantial Form Finally.The Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom and Form By Anthony J. the Holy Spirit of Divine Wisdom.

Chapter 46 The Lurking God .

Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.A. Fejfar The Lurking God I saw God around a corner. God is a cloud. I wondered if. Fejfar..A Poem By Anthony J. A whisp in the air. Every once and awhile. J. Wonderful feeling. A Loving Spirit. B.D. He doesn’t smother. I saw God on a seashore. A bit of a trial. Never a snore. It doesn’t last long. He could see me. A huggable Bear. A wonderful God. Colors galore.. Beautiful waves. Grace that saves. Chapter 47 The Moderation Corporation and Income Tax . Loving the Other. Esq. God respects my Freewill. Then behind a Tree.. I saw God in a rainbow. A beautiful feeling. I talk to God.

Chapter 48 The Origin of the Nolo Contendere Plea in Criminal Law . Fejfar Previously. whether I am selling legal services or a golf cart.A..D. and that of a not-for-profit. as such. the idea is that the price that the buyer pays should be proportionately reduced based on the buyer having a lower income than the norm. J. a sliding fee scale for the sale of corporate goods and services. Where such a Moderation Corporation is using a sliding fee scale. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. The sliding fee scale is based upon the buyer’s annual income.By Anthony J. which pays income tax. Fejfar. Esq. but also can receive tax deductible charitable contributions. thus. which is not only exempt from income tax. My argument is that a Moderation Corporation should have as an essential attribute. Dividends of a Moderation Corporation would be taxable. I argue that the Moderation Corporation would serve a useful function in a market economy. The Moderation Corporation. would find itself in position half way between that of a for profit corporations. The purpose of a Moderation Corporation is to produce a moderate profit using moderate means. Thus. and that corporate wages and salaries also should be exempt from income tax. I argue that that corporation should be exempt from federal and state income tax. B. and would promote social responsibility of business. I have argued for the existence and use of a Moderation Corporation.. I have also argued that a Moderation Corporation should be given special tax treatment..

The Nolo plea is often used where a Criminal Defendant is willing to take a Nolo to a lesser charge in exchange for a more serious charge being dropped. one either pleads guilty or innocent.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. or the Messiah. but on the other hand. “It is you who say that I am “[the King of the Jews and the Messiah]. in a Criminal Case. Jesus was being tried before Pilate with the crime of being the King of the Jews. Esq. For example. So. a capable lawyer himself was placed in a difficult situation. It is also used in some circumstances to avoid collateral use of a guilty plea conviction. because of the politics of the situation. Fejfar The Nolo Contendere plea in Criminal Law is an interesting legal doctrine. just what is the Nolo Contendere plea? Well.. Ordinarily. it is best for a Criminal Defendant to plead Nolo Contendere. I argue that the Nolo Contendere plea is based upon English Ecclesial Law which is modeled after the encounter of Jesus with Pilate during Holy Week. one might wonder what the origin of the Nolo plea is in western law. Jesus could not really deny that he was the King of the Jews and the Messiah. . Fejfar..D. Jesus. and I have an answer. Sometimes. obviously could not admit that it was a crime for him to be the King of the Jews and the Messiah.By Anthony J. Now. Now. what the Nolo plea does is state for the record that the Defendant is not opposing a conviction by the state of the Defendant for a particular crime. Once charged by Pilate for treason for being the King of the Jews and the Messiah. instead it is simply a refusal to contest the conviction that is entered without an innocent plea. knowing that a Nolo conviction cannot be used against him in a later disbarment proceeding. The Nolo plea is not an admission of guilt. however.A. Jesus said to Pilate. In so doing. J. B. an attorney defendant might take a Nolo plea to a crime but not confess guilt.

Jesus entered the first Nolo Contendere plea that we know of. Obviously. Jesus did not deny the charge. Chapter 49 The Origins of the Crime of Penury . the Nolo plea of Jesus carried over into later ecclesial law and then the English Common Law. but on the other hand did not admit guilt.

Esq. The Protestants and their King were doing everything they could to destroy Roman Catholocism in England. Fejfar.D. The one place where you can find Penury listed is in Black’s Law Dictionary. Fejfar Penury is a crime that you will not find in the statute books. Any person who had taken a religious vow of poverty in Roman Catholic religious life was charged criminally in ecclesial court with Penury. the Roman Catholic “threat” had been stilled and another threat became apparent to the Protestant Anglican aristocracy. B. they are illegally and involuntarily put on psychiatric wards to try to force them to become atheists.An Allegorical Account By Anthony J. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.. Penury was also charged against Roman Catholic lay leaders who were spiritual leaders or political leaders. By 1850.. This practice of persecuting both mystical or spiritual Catholic and Protestant “Saints” spread to the United States and is still in use today.A. in England. where Penury is defined as “Poverty. where the penalty was either death or life in prison. the King who broke from Rome and founded the Protestant. In fact. Protestant Mysticism. So Penury first became a crime in the Anglican Ecclesial Courts in England during the reign of King on. J. Protestant Mystics and spiritualists who became religious or political leaders were also charged with Penury.. Anglican Church of England.” Henry VIII. that is. the word “Penury” is not even found in most standard dictionaries. If they are not illegally prosecuted and put in jail. .

S.C. section 1983.S. Any other interpretation means that we are living now under a fascist dictatorship with no religious freedom. Although the United States Supreme Court has tried to do away with religious freedom in this country in the Smith. and 18 U.C.The charge of Penury in the United States is clearly unconstitutional as a violation of the First Amendment. peyote case. Chapter 50 . and the real Constitution tell us that a criminal charge of Penury is unconstitutional and a violation of 42 U. section 242. Natural Law.

they see it as evil. The Republicans seem to want the State to fall away so that we can be left with a Communist Utopia.D. and ignorance.. So. This is precisely the Communist attitude which Marx wrote about. From Ronald Reagan to George Bush the Republicans have done everything that they can at both the state and federal level to dismantle government. Apparently. Even rich people wonder if they can afford to send their kids to college anymore. at least in some quarters. it is thought. euthanasia. Rather that seeing the government as a good. Never mind that the government was trying to regulate the economy so that it would stay both fair and private. Esq. abortion. perhaps the real Communist revolution in this country will come not from the Democratic Party. Like the Soviet Union. But. when the Democrats wanted more funding for social programs. Fejfar. such “Big Government” Democrats were really Communists trying to bring about a controlling central government. the thought was that in the Soviet Union the government ran everything.A. J. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. that if there was ever to be a Communist revolution in the United States. that it would come from the Democratic Party. Ronald Reagan did the best he could to destroy the middle class in this country by preventing its children from going to college. It is even worse today.The Republican Manifesto By Anthony J. and so. not the government. unemployment. I would like to propose another idea about Communism in this essay. in the Communist Manifesto said that at the end of the materialist dialectical process. I suspect that the Communist Utopia we will end up with will involve poverty. Karl Marx. but from the Republican Party. Law school tuition is so high that it is de facto impossible for most . Fejfar Typically. B... the government would fall away as an unnecessary evil. Never mind that the social programs put money into the pockets of private individuals.

law graduates to start a solo practice. Perhaps. Food for thought. almost guaranteeing that they will not be able to represent middle class or low income clients. Sixty dollars is about enough to buy food for one person for a week. instead of being anticommunist was really a communist himself. In Pennsylvania. Chapter 51 . for example welfare pays only $600 per month. The idea that welfare exists is a joke. Ronald Reagan. not a month. Often these lawyers have a student loan debt of over $120.000. Then the government has the nerve to insist that relatives cannot give gifts to help make up the difference so that a relative doesn’t starve to death. So perhaps the Republican Manifesto has come to pass afterall. while food stamps pays only $60 per month.

transferring David to a psychiatric ward. David was charged criminally with motor vehicle homicide.. Esq. and entered the order. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. David did his job competently and well for over 20 years. Fejfar. After conferring. when the law in England was that he should be driving on the left hand side.The Schizophrenic Driver An Allegorical Tale By Anthony J. In his last accident. Fejfar David Greene was a driver for United Postal Service in Indianapolis. The next day David’s solicitor met with the barrister assigned to defend David in court.A. Indiana.. David’s barrister pled that David was not guilty because he (David) was judicially incompetent to stand trial at the time of the offence for schizophrenia. Once on the ward David was once again diagnosed with schizoprehenia by his psychiatrist. B. J. David insisted that he had done nothing wrong and was not mentally ill. When David reached age 40.. and asked for long term psychiatric care for David. instead he was just following . It was David’s second week on the job in London.D. and already he had been involved in 6 separate car accidents with his UPS truck. The judge agreed. When David’s attorney (Solicitor) visited David in prison. as well as the UPS driver’s manual. David told his solicitor that he (David) was following the same law that he always had in the United States. UPS offered him a job at twice the pay on a new delivery route in London. not once being involved in a car accident with his UPS truck. England. he discovered that David’s problem was that David thought that he (David) should be driving on the right hand side of the road.

according to the psychiatrist was delusional in thinking that the American rule of driving on the right was the rule to be followed in England. The psychiatrist replied no. The psychiatrist agreed. only in England. The psychiatrist told David that this was precisely why David was schizophrenic. of political to him and not medical. David. David then asked the psychiatrist if he David would be considered schizophrenic in the United States. David responded that it all seemed sort Chapter 52 .the law as he learned it in the United States and the UPS drivers manual.

all Sons of Liberty should be dedicated to two purposes: The Liberal Scale of Values and the Ethical Matrix. The primary purpose of the Sons of Liberty is to ensure that a liberal. Liberty based society is present throughout the world.The Sons of Liberty: An International Wisdom Society By Anthony J. Individual Self Actualization (actualizing one’s meaningful projects) 4. Individual Rational Self Interest 3. Individual Self Transcendence (compassion for oneself and others) The Ethical Matrix requires that one who is a Son of Liberty make his or her ethical decisions on the Natural Law Ethical Principles of: Reciprocity (treat another as you would wish to be treated in similar circumstances. Esq. Individual Autonomy 2. Fejfar I propose that those of us who are sympathetic to much of what I have been writing.. should band together and form an International Wisdom Society: The Sons of Liberty. and Equity (equity favors the one in need.A. equity favors the one . B. J. Utility (Maximization of Value based on the Liberal Scale of Values stated above)..D. Proportionality (law and equality are based on the idea of proportionality with proportionality symbolized by an equilateral triangle divided down the center forming two smaller right triangles which mirror each other). Fejfar.. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. In achieving this goal of Liberty. The Liberal Scale of Values represents a morality based upon Liberty and the 4 Liberty based values of: 1.

with the greatest need. is the basis for Natural Rights and Liberty. equity says that for each Son of Liberty. to each according to one’s need. Natural Law. The Sons of Liberty support a Constitutional Democracy with a legislative. . Finally. The Sons of Liberty support the judicial review of all legislative and executive branch actions using the Constitution. The Sons of Liberty support Social Responsibility of Business where business decisions are made using the Ethical Matrix. judicial. based on Classical Philosophy. as a basis for Liberty should be taught in grade school through graduate school. Neothomism. requiring all law to be reasonable. the Sons of Liberty should support the use and teaching of Metaphysics. and executive branches of government. from each according to one’s ability).

Chapter 53 The Sons of Liberty: An International Wisdom Society (2)1 By Anthony J. Liberative Social Political Action 6. judgment-reflection. understanding. Fejfar The Goal of a Son of Liberty is to achieve Liberty for himself and others. Individual Cognitive Liberation 2. Individual Metaphysical Liberation 3. Liberative Law Enforcement Individual Cognitive Liberation involves the “self appropriation” of one’s mind in a quadrilectical movement of experience. What is Liberation? We can see a eight fold movement of Liberation: 1. This can be done through the process of Liberation. Individual Ethical Liberation 4. Liberative Social Norming 7. Liberative Law 8. Fejfar © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. . Social Liberation Critique of Unjust Social Structures 5.

Being is the basis for the Incomprehensible God the Father. Jesus Christ. It is the appropriation of Being. Finally. understanding. Love is Liberation. and Substance. judment-reflection.and love. In order to Liberate. we must first experience what is going on. we must then each know what is going on. to really act to Liberate we must love. that causes Liberation to Flourish. or Reason itself. we must each then understand what is going on. or Creative Reason. Finally. judgment-reflection. Being is the basis for much of our Intuition of Reality. In the final analysis love Liberates. and love. Being is Form of Form. experience. more than anything else. Finally. which paradoxically is a combination of Truth. Love moves the will to Act when we are afraid to act. and Substance. and love. Each of us must experience: experience. judgment-reflection. The Second Movement of Liberation is Metaphysical Liberation. through judgment and reflection. and love. judgment-reflection. an Unrestricted Pure Act of Understanding. Substance is Formless Form. In order to Liberate. and love. understanding. understanding. Each of us must understand: experience. Logos is Creative Form. Metaphysical Liberation involves structuring one’s consciousness with Being. understanding. Each of us must judge and reflect that we know reality through experience. Logos. with a small amount of Form and love. each of us must love. Logos is the basis for The Word which is the Son of God. In order to Liberate. Creative Word. Being Liberates! Logos Liberates! Substance Liberates! . Logos.

Proportionality means equality before the law. . There are four basic Natural Law Ethical Principles: 1. better or worse. both individually. Utility 3. Rules Metaphysical Intuition. and a scale of values. judgment-reflection. Value implies Proportionality is seen best in a one to one individual values. love. Here. ratio. Reciprocity 2. Liberates! Utility Liberates! Proportionality Liberates! Equity Liberates! The Fourth Movement of Liberation is the Social Liberation Critique of Unjust Social Structures. Equity Reciprocity requires that the individual treat another as that person would like to be treated in similar circumstances. understanding. Need is based upon love. combine to critique unjust social structures. Proportionality 4. Equity means that Equity makes an equitable Reciprocity exception from a general rule based upon need. and Ethics. Utility means Maximization of Value. Damages paid should be proportional to damages sustained. to do. experience. Finally.Individual Ethical Liberation is the Third Movement of Liberation. and socially. Ethics teaches us what is right or wrong.

Liberative social rules must be taught in school and at Society must reward those who engage in Liberatory consciousness and action. and are unjust. Rules which lack love as their basis.which are wrong in the face of experience. Liberation must support active Social Norming. social and political action is required. Law is to support the common good. Liberation requires social and political action. utility. which reject a transcendent Metaphysical basis for Reality are unjust. and society must sanction those who oppose Liberatory consciousness and action. and rather are based upon hate. home. does not necessarily mean that it will be enforced. As Saint Thomas Aquinas said. are unjust. are impractical and unjust. Liberative Social and Political Action Liberates! Liberative Social Norming is the Sixth Movement of Liberation. In order for unjust laws to be repealed. In order for just laws to be enacted in the first place. This is the natural societal function. So. . Similarly. Rules which are obtuse or irrational violate substantive due process. Thus children are taught not to steal as a moral rule long before they are taught this as a legal rule. social and political action is required. The Fifth Movement of Liberation is liberative Social Political Action. Rule which are unwise in their rejection of good judgment or reflection. are unjust. rules which do not involve reciprocity. proportionality. In order for just laws to be enforced. social and political action is required. Rules Rules which are Unethical are unjust. and equity. are unreasonable and unjust. Just because a just law is on the books.

Law and Liberation (substantial use of essay) Fejfar. Jurisprudence for a New Age Lonergan. Rawls. must also fight. Cognitional Structure. just. Method in Theology Lonergan. so to those who are oppressed in undemocratic. police officers. political. and judges. Both individual as well as societal liberation is required. legislators. such as we have in the United States. Insight Lonergan. are required to Liberate and to be Liberated. unjust regimes.Liberative Law is the Seventh Movment of Liberation. Just as the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution fought a Revolutionary War of Liberation against King George. Liberate! All eight movements of Liberation are required for a just society to exist. In the case of a democratic. Even lay persons are required to stay informed and involved in law enforcement. is required. especially. or near just society. only democratic. and legal change. non-violent means of social. Those responsible for the administration of justice. Law Liberates! Liberative Law Enforcement is the Eight Movement of Liberation. lawyers. A Theory of Justice in Collection Law Enforcement must . Bibliography Fejfar.

or Race-Notice real property recording statutes.. B. that a Tenacy by the Entirety is an estate where. Instead. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. The only significant property that Wife owned was her share of Blackacre.A. J.” might have something to do with a youthful indiscretion which took place after a college beer party. If one cannot undertake a valid search using the Grantor- Grantee index and verify the chain of title. Recall.. Now. .. In states where there is no Tract Index (most of the East and South in the United States). Husband dies. Fejfar One might think that a “Wild Deed. five years later. back to our hypothetical. the Attorney for Husband’s Estate. and hold Blackacre as Tenant by the Entirety. one must be able to undertake a Grantor-Grantee and a Grantee-Grantor search of the public real estate recording records. Wife dies and no one bothers to probate the estate. then this is a defect in the title. in order for a title to real property to be valid. Esq. Husband and Wife hold a Tenacy by the Entirety in Blackacre. I didn’t think that it would ever come up in real life. among other things. Oliver Attorney. in order to establish a good chain of title. probates the Will by filing for Letter Testamentary and the Will is recorded by the Registrar of Wills Office with the County.Chapter 54 The Wild Deed and Real Property Law By Anthony J. Imagine this situation. Notice. Recall. I must tell you that a “Wild Deed” is a concept found in Real Property Law. but I have a situation in mind where it can. one half of the interest in the real property in question passes to the surviving spouse by survivorship when the other spouse has died. leaving Blackacre to his four children by Will. there must be a valid chain of title. Husband and Wife are married.D. Then. that because of the existence of Race. When I was taught about the “Wild Deed” in law school. Fejfar. also.

it is found outside the chain of title after H’s will is recorded. So . but it is not there.” Let me explain. To start the title search. and H’s will to his children. Bill is the Grantee and Children of H and W are the Grantor. Children of H and W are the Grantee and H’s will is the Grantor. but Sally’s attorney runs into a problem. In theory you will find it filed between the original Deed to H and W. attorney must use the Grantee-Grantor index and work backwards. is that the Death Certificate showing the transfer by survivorship is not in the chain of title. This is a serious defect in the title. H is the Grantee by survivorship and H and W the Grantor by the Deed The problem however.Oliver Attorney then files the Death Certificate for Wife in the Chain of Title in the Registrar of Deeds Office. let’s see what we find in the search. Bill and Sally sign a Purchase Agreement which states that Bill will provide Sally with “Marketable Title. The filed Death certificate functions as a Wild Deed. listing H and W as the Grantor and H as the Grantee. Here it is. Without realizing it. Let us say further that the children of Husband convey Blackacre to Bill in fee simple absolute. Bill records the Deed and then in turn tries to sell Blackacre to Sally. Instead.” Sally has a title search done. Oliver Attorney has created a “Wild Deed.

accomplished. For an idealist. results are all that count. and Road’s other books.. For the realist. . For a realist. intent is everything. Similarly. or pragmatist. or was. nothing at all would be. we see a discussion of the ideas of “intent” and “timing. even if I paint the picture for all the wrong reasons. if it was done with the wrong intent. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and have the right intent. and intent is irrelevant. If I try to accomplish something. From the realist point of view. I still have done the right thing. with good intent. that is praiseworthy..Chapter 55 Timing and Intent By Anthony J. For a realist. intent is pretty much irrelevant. Fejfar In the book. An idealist would tell us that even if one accomplished the greatest feat in the world.D.” Both are very interesting concepts. if I paint a perfect picture. Esq. Fejfar. the worst sin is failure to achieve practical results. “Journey into Oness” by Michael Roads. results don’t really even matter. J. fails to accomplish his objective. The realist never praises the idealist who. for a genuine idealist. even if I fail.

Roads argues for the existence of multidimensional reality. I will not be rewarded for painting a flawed picture with good intent. Jesus and his disciples were walking by a fig tree which was barren. very important. if we do not have the right intent. It is hard to understand. this story is about intent. Jesus seems to have been concerned with this idea when considering the story of the fig tree in the Christian Gospels. And. both intent and results count. what’s more it was not the season for figs for that tree. really is not perfect.For the Critical Realist or Critical Thomist. Roads discusses the importance of intent. producing no fruit. is thus. Without intent all is for naught. and. Jesus curses the fig tree and days later when Jesus and the disciples return. walking by the fig tree. Now. then. the supposed perfect picture of the artist with bad intent. for example. getting back to Michael Roads. In fact. they notice that the tree was withered and dying. So too with us. but if the artist really had the right intent. Good intent. Roads also discusses timing. what’s more. then he would have been able to paint a perfect picture. the . neither will I be rewarded for painting a perfect picture with bad intent. although it may appear to be. no matter how hard we try. no matter how much we may appear to succeed. has a multidimensional aspect to it. it would appear that intent itself will ensure that an act is brought to fruition. So. Real timing. Because the tree had the wrong intent. Now. it could not produce fruit. we fail.

“Bill” to get sick. or timing in a boxing match. Perhaps God allowed. timing takes on an even more refined aspect. the timing is not right for me to go to graduate school next year because I need to do multidimensional work that would help myself or others. Although Roads does not discuss God in relation to multidimensional reality very much. can and does shift forward and backward in time in relation to each of us and our multidimensional alternates. But. Food for thought. we Providentially end up doing things that we really weren’t expecting to be doing. that by our choice. of the Jane Roberts books. . for example can be very important. or even caused. Our God. It is possible. for example. Seth points out the our God is a multidimensional God.idea of timing in playing basketball. Seth. so that God could do some multidimensional work with Bill. This is where God comes in. where Bill’s conscious mind would not cooperate. does. Because in multidimensional reality the past can affect the future and the future can affect the past. or by God’s intervention in our lives. knowing when to shoot a jump shot. timing is even more complicated. knowing when to use the left jab. then. Perhaps.

He was an A. in Lancaster. He never had to get into a fight for a long time. Tom took a vow of self-defense only non-violence. Something to fight for. Tom was a Spiritual Catholic. Esq. Next. . Tom went back to school the next fall.. correct the situation. and multidimensionally. The Holy Spirit told Tom that this would place Tom in the Dao spiritually so that it would be very difficult. Tom had a problem. Nebraska. Tom was basically a good kid. This vow also gave Tom meaning. starting 10th grade. and Highschool.Chapter 56 To the Death and Beyond An Allegory By Anthony J. Tom decided to go on a summer spiritual retreat to see if he could solve his problem. if not impossible for anyone to physically attack Tom. First. Tom spent two days praying and then suddenly his Intuition was activated and he knew what he had to do. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and when he did. and there was a Bully and a gang who was after him. shift his Soul or Spirit back into his body immediately prior to getting killed.” This made Tom a multidimensional immortal. and with his newly acquired Wisdom.. he could immediately. Tom took a vow to “Fight for Justice and Social Justice to the Death and Beyond.D. Fejfar. If Tom was ever killed. J.student and enjoyed playing sports.. B.A. Fejfar Tom Phiffer was in 9th Grade at Clark Junior High. and a vow not to carry a weapon. he won. But.

The Transcendental Precepts do not produce some sort of moral or epistemological absolutism. Fejfar In his book.A. Jesuit Philosopher. Esq. fallible. a more wise reflection. B. Method in Theology. and Fejfar’s Critical Thomism. The epistemology of Lonergan’s Critical Realism. the Transcendental Precepts produce probable knowledge..Chapter 57 Transcendental Method and Espistemology By Anthony J. In other words. it is apparent that the Transcendental Precepts are epistemological. discusses the Transcendental Precepts.D.. Fejfar. a new understanding.. . Analytic Mind Spirit. Base Emotions Soul Mind. is one which is self-correcting. Wisdom Level of Reflection and Judgment Thus. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Bernard Lonergan. subject to revision. the first three Transcendental Precepts parallel Lonergan’s Cognitional Structure as well as the levels of Consciousness described by Plato: Be Attentive Be Intelligent Be Reasonable Level of Experience Level of Understanding Body Mind. yielding provisional results which are subject to revision upon the acquisition of new data. which can be described as: Be Attentive Be Intelligent Be Reasonable Be Responsible Be Loving Interestingly. J.

Transcendental Method begins with Experience. Esq. has a certain objective quality to it. Transcendental Method argues that there are several levels of consciousness. Experience is defined as that aspect of human knowing which provides the mind with the data of sense experience. J. would argue that one can deconstruct Transcendental Method and find that it is not transcendent at all.. Experience is the basis for empiricist philosophy and logical positivism.. and then culminates in Reflection and Judgment. felt. as such. There is also Understanding.Chapter 58 Transcendental Method and Postmodernism By Anthony J. if one were attempting to deconstruct Transcendental Method. all is culture. smelled. about all we can say in the negative is that Experience is not all there is to knowing. I. on the other hand. They argue that all is context. it would seem that one would start by trying to deconstruct Experience. argue that Transcendental Method survives the postmodern critique. it is obvious that Experience. Experience is what is seen. tasted.D. Judgment and Reflection. moves to Understanding. and in fact turns out to be a more adequate postmodern philosophy than that of the French deconstructionists.A. touched. In fact. if one were to argue that Transcendental Method exists. I am sure. as Bernard Lonergan has in his book. which when used together. So. B. In deconstructing Experience. Method in Theology. Now. all is immanent. Now. heard. we . Fejfar Some academics have argued that the Transcendent does not exist. nothing can be transcended. In deconstructing Experience. let us begin with Transcendental Method and then attempt to deconstruct it as Derrida might try.. provide a transcendental method of find fallible truth. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. postmodern deconstructionists. Fejfar.

one probably would argue along the lines of hermeneutics. racist. the idea of logical constistency. at the level of Understanding. In this sense. In terms of postmodern deconstruction. Experience. that likes should be treated alike. as a general rule. Logic helps us to see that certain ideas are rational and others are not. One also categorizes the data of Experience. Understanding. it seems difficult to argue that Understanding is sexist. Using Transcendental Method. that meaning categories act to create reality. Thus. I would search for another Paradigm which was more adequate. that many Paradigms seem to be incommensurate with each other. Transcendental Method is cumulative and self correcting. the hermeneutic circle is formed. Finally. survives the postmodern critique. Structures of Scientific Revolutions. it is not sexist. it is not antienvironment. And. not just describe it. one generates theories and hypothesis. Not much more can be said. for example. Experience is not racist. and. However. Now. At the level of Understanding. In attempting to deconstruct Understanding. that scientific inquiry uses “Paradigms” in order to understand reality. let us move to the level of Understanding. The postmodernist might argue. is a transcendental idea. following Thomas Kuhn’s work. one asks all the pertinent questions. I would simply argue that I would search for a New Paradigm which reconciles the Old Paradigms.can simply say that Experience by itself is inadequate because Experience can be fooled by sensory illusions such as the appearance of a straight stick looking crooked when placed in a glass tank of water. in the context of Understanding and Reflection and Judgment. it is not homophobic. homophobic or anti-environment. Who? What? Why? When? Where? Etc. if this new Paradigm turned out to be inadequate. there are some ideas or concepts which have a transcend function which help us to improve our understanding over what we had before. as Gadamer points out. as an idea and an operation does not seem to . Thus. and compares and contrasts ideas and data.

Additionally. there is the level of Judgment and Reflection. Understanding. outside of space-time. There are hundred of studies which have scientifically proven the existence of Intution. So. it appears that Transcendental Method survives the postmodern critique. In terms of the postmosdern critique.be culturally biased. especially taken in the context of the higher function of Judgment and Reflection. but instead seems to transcend culture. sexist. Awakening Intuition. then. All Derrida can do is deconstruct. flies in the face of human experience and scientific fact. . Intuition is what transforms mere analytic rationality into intellectual reason. it difficult to see how Intuition is racist. This. Derrida’s postmodernism is flawed. finding the most adequate Understanding available. As Bergson puts it. survives the postmodern critique. The tradesman analyist is not an intellectual. is a Quantum Ability. at least in part. While. Intuition provides an Intellectual Sympathy which enables us to know reality more adequately. As Frances Vaughn points out in her work. homophobic. we have contemporary Quantum Physics to explain to us how Intuition seems to work. or antienironment. however. it would appear that anyone can develop Intution through a sustained use of Meditation. Judgment and Reflection is the cognitive function or operation which takes Understanding and then evalutates it on a higher level. Derrida’s deconstruction does not survive Critical Thomist or Critical Realist postmodern critique. Finally. in terms of the postmodern critique. Finally. Judgment and Reflection are Alinear Intuitive functions which act to transcend mere Understanding. at the same time. he or she lacks the integration of Intuition with analytic understanding. non-locally. I have argued that Intuition. Derrida has no basis for reconstructing reality. then. where the mind interfaces with the Quantum Field. I suppose that one might argue that Intution is irrational and false consciousness.

. wrongly. The Judicial Branch. if we reflect.e.. In fact.D. I argue that with each Person of the Trinity there is an accompanying Metaphysical Quiddity. Logos.A. J.. Fejfar. God the Son (Logos). it is apparent that the three branches of government.. The Holy Trinity is composed of Three Persons. Being. In my judgment. Now. i. is based upon the Holy Trinity Itself.Chapter 59 Trinitarian Democracy By Anthony J. it is generally understood that God the Father is the Highest or Ultimate Authority as being Supremely Good. Similarly. that Constitutional Democracy was not part of God’s Plan for humanity. the President of the United States is seen as being the Highest Civil . Each Person of the Trinity is the Personal manifestation of the Objective Metaphysical Quiddity to which it is paired. with a Tripartite System of Government. I would argue that the American Constitution. this is wrong. B. Esq. and God the Holy Spirit (Substance). that is with three branches of government. Fejfar Some fundamentalist Christians seem to think. God the Father (Being). and Substance. parallel the Trinity: Executive Branch Judicial Branch Legislative Branch God the Father (Ultimate Authority) God the Son (Jesus Christ as Judge) God the Holy Spirit (Holy Spirit inspiring people from the bottom up) Now. The Executive Branch. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. and the Legislative Branch.

God the Father seems to work from the top down.Authority having the most personal power to get things done.” authoring popular movements of the Spirit in society. is. Jesus Christ. the Holy Spirit is thought of as inspiring revolutions of the Spirit. In fact. we like to think of our presidents as being Good not evil. unconstitutional. it is also generally understood that the Holy Spirit.” in governmental terms. the Court also has the power to declare executive actions and legislative enactments. Jesus is considered to be Logos or Reason. to bring about a better society. the United States Supreme Court. has the responsibility of inspiring humanity to be its best. as the second Person of the Trinity. The Son of God. That is why we elect them. Now. as Loving Truth. and God the Holy Spirit seems to work from the bottom up. Similarly. The Holy Spirit is thought to work best. as revolutionary. is seen as having the right to judge persons under law. has the responsibility of Judging humanity. it is also generally understood the Jesus Christ. Perhaps. in the creative mode Creative Form. and in the stable mode. This is consistent with the idea that the Role of Jesus in the Trinity is equal to that of the God the Father. The rather interesting thought. a panel of Judges. The Legislative Branch is thought to be the most responsive to the current desires of the American People. is the mediating aspect of the Trinity. Now. from the “ground up. the Holy Spirit. Substantial Form. opposing movements of the Spirit that are not consistent with Reason. has Power equal to that of God the Father and God the Son. and opposing The . While in religious terms Christians can be thought of as the “People of God. then. Thus. Ideally. or Substance.” The American People. While God the Father is often thought of as enforcing the status quo. God the Father may have a different political agenda than God the Holy Spirit. that it just may be that while the Holy Trinity is a Unity of Substance (Nicea). the American people share the same role as the “People of America.

rather than Aristotle.Will of God the Father if it is not consistent with Reason. the Trinity is a dynamic unity in harmony which is more like the Greek Philosopher Hericlitus would have it. Perhaps. .

Chapter 60

Truth, Relativism, and Evil By Anthony J. Fejfar, J.D., Esq., Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar

When I grew up, as a kid, it was generally understood that truth was good. It was generally good to tell the truth and not to lie. At a certain point, It was the middle of the Vietnam War and suddenly a

however, this began to change.

lot of people had a hard time finding the truth about Vietnam. We saw new reports, we saw government statements and we saw teenagers go off to war, many of whom never came back. Next, we began to see stories in the news at school about Northern Ireland. We were told that the war was a religious war and that basically both the Catholics and the Protestants were wrong. Northern Ireland was a scandal to the Christian Church. So, with all of this the teaching authority of both civil society and the church began to crumble. Soon, we began being taught relativism at school. And, relativism ended up being extreme relativism, that is, the idea that everything is relative. Only relative truth existed, and relative truth was really no truth at all. Very soon it became apparent that

an person arguing for truth or objectivity was considered to be evil. While relativism did not recognize the good, it did recognize evil, which was moral absolutism, absolute truth, etc. From a classical point of view then, it had gotten to the point that good was

evil and evil was good, a sure recipe for disaster. Now, absolute truth might exist, but I am not arguing for absolute truth. In fact, I like some aspects of relativism: a respect for minority positions and dissent and a willingness to revise one’s judgments about the truth when new evidence or a new understanding of the evidence is available. As a Critical Thomist, then, I argue for moderate relativism and moderate truth rather than extreme relativism or absolute truth. With moderate relativism there

is always room for reasonable argumentation, for two side of the story, for the adversarial system of justice, for constitutional democracy. Extreme relativism, in the

end, just leads us back to a naïve sort of authoritarian fundamentalism which is based upon an inauthentic adherence to some authority figure. In Amenrica, Military Officers swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, they do not swear a loyalty oath to a president or dictator. So, I argue that the best truth we can get is 99.999999999999% true. This is as good as it gets. Any truth statement made can always be subject to reasonable critique and revision. While some of us might wish for absolute truth, it is very hard to come by, and is often presented in a manipulative way. We are better off having a

society and a school system which is based upon moderate truth.

While some might

say that absolute truth is evil, I would say also that extreme relativism is evil, albeit, relatively evil.

these scientists could not account for a Unitary nature of Reality anymore. The problem was.. Esq. scientific experiments started “proving” the existence of such subatomic particles as the electron. While the search for Unified Quantum Field Theory was still well under way. atoms. J. the Quanta. Einstein developed Relativity Theory and other scientists developed Quantum Theory. Thus. This idea was that the ultimate nature of reality was characterized by inanimate. Soon. It was thought that if Unified Quantum Field Theory was found. though. not just a probabilistic nature manifesting multidimensionally. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. some scientists decided to take another approach. This new approach to reality was called String Theory. this would once again argue that there is a unitary nature to reality itself. some scientists and philosophers started wondering if in fact the Atom itself was composed of even smaller particles which they called subatomic particles. About the time that subatomic particles started being talked about. Thus..A. . the positron. Because of this we developed to some extent what can be described as an Atomistic World View. B. Interestingly.D. Fejfar The “modern” view of reality which prevailed in the West for quite some time was that we lived in a materialistic world and universe where the building block of reality is and was the Atom. After awhile.Chapter 61 Unified Quantum Field Theory By Anthony J. the search began for Unified Quantum Field Theory. the photon. material. the quark. String Theory argued that the ultimate nature of reality is composed of “strings” which mask themselves as subatomic particles.. and finally. the ultimate nature of reality is the chameleon string. Fejfar.

Cause. on the other hand. how is all of this reconciled with the old Atomistic theory? Most scientists would argue. The Quantum Field and individual Quanta Particles simply played the parts necessary for ancient and medieval metaphysics to work. there really were no atoms. Perhaps in the ancient world where everyone believed in Form. even prior to reading about string theory. a quark.however. Food for thought. as still could be valid. is a chameleon particle. This also accounts for the idea that medieval and ancient classical physics or metaphysics was. and Accident. without any subatomic particles at all. I argue that the transpersonal meaning reality of Western culture was so strong that the Quanta particles all masked themselves as Atoms. of sorts. that Atomism was merely a mistaken theory. I argue that the Quanta subatomic particle. have a more subtle argument to be made. While the Quanta can certainly display itself as a Quanta. and Unitary Quantum Field Theory exists as science. the answer which I came up with. like string theory. The Quanta masks itself as other subatomic particles by reason of meaning and/or natural law. . etc. is this: The ultimate building block of the universe is the Quanta subatomic particle. there is a Unitary Quantum Field. Now. a positron. I suspect. I. how to reconcile string theory with Quantum Theory? Well. Thus. it can also display as an electron.

the search began for Unified Quantum Field Theory. the photon. material. these scientists could not account for a Unitary nature of Reality anymore. While the search for Unified Quantum Field Theory was still well under way.. This idea was that the ultimate nature of reality was characterized by inanimate. the quark. The problem was. and finally. the positron. Thus. It was thought that if Unified Quantum Field Theory was found. Interestingly. not just a probabilistic nature manifesting multidimensionally. scientific experiments started “proving” the existence of such subatomic particles as the electron. About the time that subatomic particles started being talked about.Chapter 62 Unified Quantum Field Theory and Being By Anthony J. Esq. the ultimate nature of reality is the chameleon string.D. .. Fejfar. some scientists decided to take another approach. this would once again argue that there is a unitary nature to reality itself.. Einstein developed Relativity Theory and other scientists developed Quantum Theory. Because of this we developed to some extent what can be described as an Atomistic World View. This new approach to reality was called String Theory. atoms. some scientists and philosophers started wondering if in fact the Atom itself was composed of even smaller particles which they called subatomic particles.A. Soon. J. Fejfar The “modern” view of reality which prevailed in the West for quite some time was that we lived in a materialistic world and universe where the building block of reality is and was the Atom. though. the Quanta. After awhile. Thus. String Theory argued that the ultimate nature of reality is composed of “strings” which mask themselves as subatomic particles. B. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.

my argument is that the concept of being. But what is Being made of? Being is composed of Beinga Streams which take the function of Quanta Particles or Strings. it can also display as an electron. Relational Meaning Streams. like string theory. While the Quanta can certainly display itself as a Quanta. One might argue that Being manifests the Quantum Field. it is apparent that Beinga Streams or Relational Meaning Streams parallel the notion of Quantum Particles and Strings. how to reconcile string theory with Quantum Theory? Well. is a chameleon particle. simultaneously. etc Now. there is a Unitary Quantum Field. In Western indigenous . asserting that there is a spirit for every person. or thing. and Unitary Quantum Field Theory exists as science. Thus. Previously. Thus. Every rock has a spirit as does every blade of grass. even prior to reading about string theory. one might argue that the Quantum Field manifests Being. if have referred to Beinga Streams as. The Quanta masks itself as other subatomic particles by reason of meaning and/or natural law. Or perhaps there is a dialectical relationship in the Dao where Being manifests the Quantum Field and the Quantum Field manifests Being. Beinga Streams are Relational Meaning Streams. or on the other hand. the answer which I came up with. Indigenous cultures are typically animistic. in Classical terms Being is Form of Form. is in fact an analogous concept. Now. It should be noted that Being as the Building Block of Reality is supported by the science of indigenous cultures. In fact this is a good definition of Beinga Streams.however. although it stands on its own two feet independently of Quantum Physics. which is my position. or an Unrestricted Act of Understanding. what then is the nature of Being? Well. the question at this point is how can Quantum Physics be reconciled with Classical Metaphysics which utilizes the concept of Being as being the foundation for Reality? Well. a positron. a quark. animal. is this: The ultimate building block of the universe is the Quanta subatomic particle. I argue that the Quanta subatomic particle.

. Moderate relativism means that there can be two sides to an argument. all support the idea of Moderate Relativism as the nature of knowledge and reality. and subject to revision. Strings. Moderate relativism supports the adversary system of justice and opposes the inquisition. Quanta Particles. Be Reasonable. and Strings. and Elemental Spirits. Moderate relativism means that we still have logic and reason.culture these spirits were referred to as Elemental Spirits. and an Equitable interpretation of law. be Loving. Moderate relativism means that we can have probabilistic knowledge of reality which is fallible. Moderate relativism means that we must follow the Transcendental Precepts of Be Attentive. Moderate relativism means that it is possible that reasonable people can differ in their assessment of a problem. Moderate relativism means that the best form of government is a Constitutional Democracy which supports individual rights at law. are all analogous to Elemental Spirits and in fact perform the same function in their respective cosmologies. Quanta Particles. you might ask what are the political implications of the foregoing. Finally. I argue that Beinga Streams. Be Responsible. the notion of Beinga Streams. Be Intelligent. and must take logical arguments seriously. or Relational Meaning Streams. In fact.

on the other hand. that psychosis is defined as that which is out of touch with reality. but instead.A. atheistic materialism denies the existence of God. atheistic materialism asserts that the ultimate nature of reality is that which is material. that an infinite regress is irrational. The argument is that our sense experience and rigorous inferences therefrom. let us consider the notion of God. Recall. Esq. Once we understand that causality exists.D. Fejfar.. think that atheistic materialism is a normative position to take. that which is based upon the idea that atoms are the ultimate reality of the universe. we must assume that there is a rational First Cause. I. it is apparent that for every effect. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Finally. or put another way. If I roll a ball into another ball. is psychotic. then this leads to an infinite regress of causes which either suggests the existence of God in reality. Let us start by looking at the basic reality premises of atheistic materialism. wrongly. then I am the efficient cause of that movement and that collision. . J. which is itself an Uncaused Cause. argue that atheistic materialism is not normative. Since the idea of an infinite regress of causes is irrational. First. But. B. there must have been a prior cause. Second. show us that causality exists. First. if this is true. or alternatively. Thomas Aquinas has presented a proof that God in fact exists.. Fejfar Some people.Chapter 63 Why Athiestic Materialism is Psychotic By Anthony J.. The argument is the God is the First Cause which is an Uncaused Cause. atheistic materialism asserts that Logical Positivism is a normative philosophy of knowledge or epistemology.

Logical positivism asserts that we know reality best through immediate sense experience and rigorous logical inferences based upon that sense experience. Thus. if I take a straight wooden dowel (stick) and look down the barrel of the stick my sense of sight shows the stick to be straight. and that one subatomic particle is the Quantum Particle. If we transcend mere sense experience. and proceed to the levels of understanding and judgment/reflection. However. and look at the dowel through the side of the tank. is that the ultimate nature of reality is material atomism. contemporary science has proven that subatomic particles exist. In fact. if I take that same wooden dowel. Because the water bends light in a particular . If sense experience is not universally reliable. Science is full of “anomalies” which cannot be explained by sense experience alone. In fact. sense experience is not universally reliable in disclosing reality. it is apparent that the crooked dowel appears to be crooked because of an optical illusion created by the water which acts like a prism. For example.The second position of atheistic materialism. which participates in the Quantum Field. Logical positivism is at a loss to explain how this could be. So. In fact logical positivism has been totally discredited. Finally. and place it in a glass walled tank of water. However. my sight sense impression has given me two completely contradictory views of reality. the dowel appears to be crooked to my sight. this assumes that sense experience is universally reliable in disclosing reality. outside of spacetime. sense impression. then there is no basis for logical positivism. one with straight dowel. it is clear that atheistic materialism is wrong in asserting that the real nature of reality is atomistic materialism. one with crooked dowel. atheistic materialism asserts that logical positivism is a normative epistemology or philosophy of knowledge.

Thus.way. even though it is really straight. on all three counts discussed earlier. . and. or Fejfar’s Critical Thomism. is psychotic. from that point of view. Thus. in summing up. it can be seen that atheistic materialism is a false philosophy. the dowel appears to crooked. logical positivism is rejected as a false philosophy in favor of Lonerganian Critical Realism.

many do not find this category helpful. it can also then reconstruct in a way which is non-materially foundationalist. While Critical Thomism can decontruct. Critical Thomism is a fallible philosophy in many respects. Fejfar. and intuitive judgment and reflection. I think that it is fair to describe Critical Thomism as a postmodern philosophy. not verbal orders of some sort. and does engage in critical deconstruction. understanding. After thinking it through. Fejfar When you are in academia. Similarly. J. While there is a certain foundationalism to Critical Thomism.. While my Critical Thomist philosophy can be described as a Neo-thomist philosophy. at least in some circles. we know probabilistically. rather than a modernist one. No. which can be revised and reformulated based . Before that. Esq. not with absolute certainty. What we know. What we know. I have taken this position bccause Critical Thomism can. it is not one which can be used deontologically.D. it was quite popular. just as much as does the postmodernism of Derrida and Foucault.. people expect you to have your philosophy to be either modernist or postmodernist. While the Platonic Forms exist for the Critical Thomist. today. people expect you to fit your academic positions into consensually acceptable analytic categories. we know on the basis of experience. they are more like guides or signposts.Chapter 64 Why Critical Thomism is a Postmodern Philosophy By Anthony J. This is because Neo-thomism sort of fell off the map around 1960. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J.

. on the other hand. the existence and action of the Quantum Field. Critical Thomism. in its typical form is and was based upon scientific or atheistic materialism. Substance. and intuitive judgment and reflection. Being. Additionally. Metaphysics grounds and guides Critical Thomism in the same way that modern atheistic. Modernism. in the first instance. Logos. materialist. science guided and grounded modernism. recognizes. it clear that Critical Thomism is not modernist. and Form.upon new experience. better understanding.

In spite of low income for some . I am putting forth the proposition that Santa Claus really exists and is the Spirit of Christmas.D. I argue that this is a mistake. an Santa Claus can come to us in his Astral Body. I suspect that we would not be giving each other gifts at Christmas time. So. in the person of Santa Claus give us the Christmas Spirit. Additionally. It is said that many saints can levitate or teleport or maybe even multilocate.. Fejfar Some people stop believing in Santa Claus around age 11. or Santa Claus is present to us in our prayers and thoughts. and of course passed over to the other side. Without this Spirit.A. Santa Claus too. B. has these gifts so that he actually does bring Christmas presents to some in a very short period of time on Earth. perhaps. He is real as much as any other Saint was real. also know to us as Santa Claus. Perhaps. it is said that some persons who die. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Saint Nicholas. do not shed their Astral Bodies. In spite of the cold weather that many of us endure at Christmas time. I would like to argue for the Spiritual presence of Santa Claus at Christmas.. among other things. Saint Nicholas died at some point. the North Pole exists on the Astral Plane. Nicholas was known for. we know that Saint Nicholas.. but instead maintain their Astral Body after life. It is said that one who has an Astral Body can materialize on Earth. Fejfar. I argue that the Holy Spirit. J. historically. Esq. Now. As a Saint. The Christmas Spirit is amazing. In the magical lore. bringing presents to children on Christmas.Chapter 65 Why Santa Claus Really Exists By Anthony J. actually lived in asia minor and is a canonized saint. Apparently. we find the time to put up the Christmas tree and find presents for our loved ones.

so we too give gifts to each other. Gifts at Christmas remind us of God’s generosity to us. And of course. As God give us gifts. the Christ Child. This is the true meaning of Christmas. I suspect that only Satanic parents refuse to give their children Christmas gifts if it is a Catholic household.households. God’s greatest gift to us at Christmas. is the gift of his Son. .

Reason. . Fejfar. is very linear in nature and as Bergson points out.. Alinear Wisdom. The Book of Wisdom. misses many of the most important nuances about life and reality. is all about Wisdom. This is absolutely not true.Chapter 66 Why Wisdom is not Satanism By Anthony J. Wisdom is the enemy of Satanism. Esq. Satanism is based upon destroying the weak. If indeed the irrational is evil (with the exception of love). J.A. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Satanism is ordered toward evil.. or rationality. Satanism is based upon hatred.. as some say. The Catholic Christian tradition has taught the importance of Wisdom throughout its history. then Wisdom is not evil in this sense because Wisdom is arational not irrational.D. In fact. B. using philosophical intuition is able to find the knowledge that “falls between the cracks” of linear rationality. an entire book of the Bible. Fejfar Some protestants seem to think that Wisdom is Satanic. In more direct terms. we can see that Wisdom and Satanism are not the same and in fact are in many ways opposites.

I would like to point out that Satanism is a bad deal. that one can use evil instrumentally. Satanism is a stupid move for those with small minds. not destroy them. Finally. it is difficult to find the foregoing list in any philosophical source. . the Jesuits teach Wisdom. evil selfdestructs. Now. The good is used to promote the Good. Although Wisdom is ordered toward the Good in the first instance. one must sell one’s soul to Satan to get anywhere with Satanism. Wisdom allows all three of the following: 1.Wisdom. Evil is used to promote the Good. Also. on the other hand. Satan always breaches his contracts. Now. and they teach that as long as one’s primary goal is the Good. Evil is used to combat Evil. it is absolutely true that evil is simply as deficiency in the Good. Satanists are hopelessly naïve in this regard. 2.” as part of my Jesuit education. Ultimately. 3. with the possible exception of Satan. himself. for some the following point may be difficult. Typically. Whether they realize it or not. but I found the foregoing to be taught to me. and ultimately Satanism self-destructs. “in between the lines. Wisdom is based upon love not hatred. is ordered towards the Good. and this is a very bad deal. Wisdom looks after the weak trying to help them.

The idea is that poor people should be forced to commit suicide or be murdered so that they are not a drag on the economy.. J. This workfare solution is economically efficient and prevents lazy people from getting a free handout. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Finally. . One argument against welfare is basically Satanic. Another argument against adequate welfare is that if we paid enough for welfare this would exceed what a person would get working a full time job at minimum wage. Fejfar.. welfare in many states is so minimal that there is almost no point to having it at all.A.. some people will be freeloaders and choose welfare. Here. Fejfar As a proponent of the Great Society. in Pennsylvania. it is argued that if welfare pays enough for a person to have a decent life. I have been told that welfare for a single person pays only $600 per month.D. that person should be required to do volunteer work or go to school full time while on welfare. For example.Chapter 67 Workfare By Anthony J. This approach is totally unethical and absurd. I respond by asserting that unless a person has a disability. Currently. Esq. when rent for a single bedroom apartment is $550 a month and groceries are $400 per month. I respond that minimum wage must be increased so that it pays enough or more than enough for a single person to live a normal life in a one bedroom apartment. B. rather than working. I am in favor of the social welfare net which prevents people from ending up out in the street or a homeless shelter if they lose their jobs.

Daoism. Zen Satori. B. on the other hand is a very “go with the flow” spirituality.Chapter 68 Zen and Daoism: Action and Inaction By Anthony J. go with the flow until nothing is happening.D. is Insight drawn from Intuition. and one wants to move. one lets reality come to you. to get things done. the end of Zen is Being. you are not the Dao. one has found the Dao. if you are not in the flow of the Dao. and then switch to the Zen of direct action. which is a Ying/Yang. When in the Dao an hour may seem like 5 minutes. and then go back into the flow of the Dao. Esq. J. Zen is very direct. In living life. rearrange the apple cart through a direct action. Zen is action. Coif © Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. or entirely in the linear Being of Zen. of complementary opposites. on the one hand. Fejfar.. all is passive. When one finds the balancing point between Ying and Yang. to act. goes with the flow for as long as practicable. as I have argued elsewhere.A. it does not pass. Whether explicitly stated or not. the good life is found I disagree. I argue that is impossible to live a good life if it is spent entirely in the Dao. It is impossible to be direct in the Dao. In the Dao. In fact. Fejfar Some argue that Daoism and Zen are basically the same spirituality or philosophy. In the Dao time flows. . When one is in a Zen mode of consciousness. In fact. Time is experienced consciously as a flow. So. one can only flow with the Dao. one is very direct. Being is a relatively unitary metaphysical quiddity.. one never seeks reality. and shifts to the Zen of action. The end of Daoism is the Dao. Time is alinear not linear. In fact in some ways Daoism and Zen are opposites.. where one begins in the Dao. and you are not being Daoist. on the other hand. When in the Dao reality is aunitary.

letting the Dao take over and do the work effortlessly. but not wonton violent aggression. Of course in doing this one should as much as possible participate in creative non-violence which allows for self-defense. THE END .