This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/7219378/TheoryoftheElectronasaCompositeParticle
03/18/2014
text
original
Zoran B.Todorović
Faculty of Sciences, University of Prishtina, Serbia&Montenegro
On the basis of derived modified quantum commutation relations for subspins have been shown that electron could
be a composite particle .Applying quantum commutations has been calculated fractal size of each subparticle which
build the internal structure of the electron.
PACS:Electron, Internal structure, Composite particle.
The beginnings of quantum mechanics dated in 1897 when J. J. Thomson defined the ratio of the electric charge of an
electron to its mass. Consequences of such discovery could not have been predicted, and none could have had the
faintest idea that the electron would assume one of the major roles in creation of new technological civilization of the
twentieth century.
Nevertheless, some questions concerning the electron have still remained open. The Dehmelt [ ] 1 indicated the
possibility that the electron might have an internal structure. By discovering and studying the unknowns of the electron,
physicists solve numerous problems in the area of experimental and theoretical physics. In such problems, the electron
is treated as a pointparticle with electric charge e, Einstein’s energy mc
2
, impulse
mv p ·
, Bohr΄s magneton
( )
0
2 / m e
B
· µ
and spin of /2. And this is, according to such opinion, quite sufficient [ ] 2 . The other properties of the
electron, such as: possible spatiality and internal structure appear to be useless and may well be designated as academic
by character. And that, simply because the electron remained inconceivable in its very essence, because no empirical
parameter had been explained theoretically [ ] 3 . Even after the turn of the twentyfirst century, it remained an unsolved
puzzle, a riddle that still inflames imagination of physicists who hope that one day they will solve it and remove the
veil behind which it is so well concealed.
We will see how electron as a point is “broken” apart, and how that points hides an internal structure. This means that
we cannot speak of the mathematical concept of point any more; it becomes, because it contains three other points
within itself, an entity with certain spatiality.
Due to its internal structure, the electron loses its property of an elementary particle; it becomes equal to the proton, at
least concerning the number of subparticles it is made of, and at the same time, the communication between the
electron and the proton in the hydrogen atom becomes symmetrical; three subparticles in the electron communicate
with three quarks in the proton, thus making the hydrogen atom stable. How to explain communication of the electron
as a point particle, as considered by the Standard Model, with the proton as a complex particle in an atom? GelMann
[ ] 4 and Zweig [ ] 5 postulated the theory of possible existence of quarks in the proton, which was experimentally
confirmed. However, the electron still keeps its status of a point particle in quantum electrodynamics. This means that,
according to mathematical definition of point, it has no spatial dimensions; and such definition of the electron is still in
effect; the electron has mass, electric charge, spin and magnetic moment, internal energy, depending on the state of
motion,
2
mc . All of its physical properties are measured through experiments, but on the location where it occupies
zero space. In other words, there is something nowhere, which is not only hard to imagine, but is impossible to
understand; it is counterintuitive and collides with common ense.
The electron as a point particle in the theory of quantum electrodynamics gives much trouble to physicists; divergent
integrals show up. Fortunately enough, physicists have found a mathematicscompliant theory applying which the
divergent integrals disappear; they obtain results that are experimentally confirmed, which makes everybody happy.
But, they are still weighed down by worries, as if having the sword of Damocles hung above their heads, that this is not
the right theory to describe natural phenomena related to the electron without spatial dimensions. This gives rise to
speculations and considerations of a possible internal structure of the electron, which cancels it as a point particle and
gives it some, although miniscule, spatial dimensions.
The attidudes and the opinion, about some open and stil actual problems, in the modern physics, by the Russian
physicist A.S. Davidov [ ] 6 introduced in his book „Quantum Mechanics“ of which some especially related to the
electron , even after his book was published, have remained stil enigmatic.The Davidov's words will be partialy quoted
in below (pp234/235)as follows:
„Novadays, the numerous particles are known such as :electrons, protons,
− µ
mesons (mesotrons),
− π
mesonspions,
Kmesons (kaons) etc , which are called << elementary particles>>, but on the present level of knowledge it is
impossible to discuss about <<internal structure>> of the particles.These particles are characterized by dhe definite
value of proper mass (mass at the state of rest), so they might be the neutral, or charged with electricity (positive or
negative) .The absolute electrical value of all stable particles charged with electricity is equal…one of the most
important features of the elementary particles is appeared at the moment of their birth, disappearing and mutual
transformation during their mutual affection. In that way the photons will be born at the change of the motion
character of the electrons located in the atoms as or the proton in the atomic nuclea. At the collision of the nuclei of
the high energy the pions are born. Neutron, as emited electron and antineutrino will be transformed into the proton.
On the other side , the protons, located in the structure of the atomic nuclea, by emiting neutrino and positron , could be
transformed into neutron. The photons in the nuclea's field could be transformed into the pair of electronpositron etc.
The discovery of the possibilities (in accordance with the law suistainable nergy, the law of electricity load and
some other laws of the suistainibility) the birth, the annulment (disappearing) and the mutual transformation of the
elementary particles have been appearing as one of the most outstanding accomplishments in the perception of the
objective (real) characteristics of the surrounding world and the mutual relationship of the different phenomena in
nature.In the connestion with the notion of <<the elementary>> and <<the isolattion>of some particles in the relation
to the others has become more and more the indefinite one.. In accordance with the present level of knowledge , the
mutual interaction among the same type of particles is effected by the other type of particles . In that way , e.g. the
charged with electricity or the neutral pion transfer the nuclear mutual affection among the nuclei..To say vice versa ,
protons and neutrons look as they are surounded by the mezon's cloud, across which ones their mutual affection is
realized ; the mezon's cluds appeared as the integral part of the protons and the neutrons, so mostly they determine
their features. On the other side, protonsneutrons by themselves determine the numerous pion's features.In this sense
the notion (idea) of <<the isolated particles>> in any form becomes senseless .So, the idea about <<free motion of
particles>> could be only the rough idealisation of the reality. In relativistic quantum mechanics of the single particle
it is not possible to locate the particle in the space, which linear dimensions are less than
( ) c m
0
4 /
, where
−
0
m
means the mass of the particle at the state of rest, but in the opposite case respect Heisenberg's uncertainty relation to
the particles, will be transferred the energy ( ) m p 2 /
2
, sufficient to create the pair of particles. That is why, the
perception of the single particle can be consider provided the external fields are absent, which leads to the <<location
of the particle>> in the space, which linear dimensions are less than Compton's wavelength
c m
0
/
of the
corresponding particle. For the border relativistic particle light quantum
( ) c v m · · , 0
 the concept of the coordinate
of the particle in the ordinary sense is completely missed”.
Sokolov [ ] 7 stated the following:”Until now all the attempts have been made in order to form electrodynamics with the
final value of the electron radius which equals with the classical radius of electron
15
0
10
−
≈ r m (Lorentz's theory, non
linear BornInfeld theory, theory BoppPodoljsky with the higher derivatives etc.) was not submitted to any convincing
results. Even more, all these theories have been gained the principle difficulties during their quantum generalization
.On the other side, the theory of the punctualpoint electron, if
0
0
→ r
leads to the endless value of the mass, as well
in the classical as in the quantum theory (p.304)”.
The problems still opened, as Davidov and Sokolov explained a few decades ago, are still present, what is
unambiguously possible to find in the work M.V. Tokarev [ ] 8 ”:The fundamental problems of the high energy physics
are in the origin of the mass, the spin and the electron charge…The new ideas and the theories are connected with the
extra dimensions, anisotropy, and fractal spacetime, the structures of the quarks, and the theories of the Grand
Unification”.
As we are going to discuss here about the internal structure of the electron, we are under the obligation to point out
some of the circumstances as the facts not contributed to the theory of electron as the point particle. It would be useful
to remind the problem known as the Lamb's shift.It presents the energetic displacement of the electron within the
hydrogen atom as the consequence of the influence of the electromagnetic field vacuum on the electron.The
theoreticians have found the solution for this problem using the principle of the regularization, by defining the lower
and the upper border line of the spectrum integration with the method known as <<cut off>>.
We consider that electron has interaction with electromagnetic field of vacuum, but always in the association with the
virtual electron, where the virtual electron presents the part of the virtual system electronpositron. In that way, the
united electron and the virtual electron in the simplest case where their spins are antiparallel, in the electromagnetic
field of vacuum, which we consider as the homogenous one, and with the definite value of the amplitude of that within
the field exposed through the middle value, as << cuted off >>on ( )
B
c m H µ µ
0
2
0
/ · [ ] 9 , present the boson which
according to the rules of quantum mechanics applies Schrődinger`s equation (
0
m
mass of the electron at the state of
rest; c the light velocity in the vacuum;
−
B
µ
Bohrُs magneton).
The solution of the equation gives the wave function Ψ as the key used to calculate all physical electron׳s
characteristics. Because of its important role in the theory , we write down the expression for psi function..It is
expressed in the form of ( ) ( ) ( )
2
0
2
0 0
4 / exp 2 2 / 1 X r X r − · Ψ π .Already the density of probability by itself
( )
2
0
2
0
2
2 / exp / 1 X r V − · Ψ · Ψ Ψ
∗
gives us very important parameter , and it is the volume which is encompassed by
the smeared electron in the space of the Compton׳s wavelength.It makes out
( ) ( )
2
0 0 0
2 2 X r V π ·
.It is also possible to
determine it from the relation ( ) ( )
2
0 0 0
2 2 / / X r B H
B B
π µ µ µ · ·
.The distribution of the mass and the electric
charge of electron in this field is according to the Gauss׳s law, and the size of the volume depends of the state of the
electron in the relation to the external fields, so it is changed according to the law ( )
2 / 3
2
0
1 β
β
− · V V .Already in that
relation we noted the forbiden state as evidently
1 · β
, because it is in collision with theory of relativity , from here
we can draw the conclusion of the impossibility to obtain the zero volume for
1 · β
; it means that the electron
cannot be the point particle, because the point particle according to the mathematical definition of the point presents
the entity out of the spatial dimension. Another important link used for description of the electron is in the
application of Maxwell׳s relation for density of the electromagnetic energy on the electron.Namely, Maxwell׳
srelation for density of the electromagnetic energy is ( ) ( ) . 2 / 1 2 / 1
2
0
2
0
BH B E · + · µ ε ϖ As we know E and B are the
transverzal components of the electric and magnetic field of the photon.If we include in this expression the<< cut off>>
values of the magnetic field components
H
and the equivalent value of the magnetic induction (
e m H B /
0 0 0
ω µ · ·
;
0 0
/ X c · ω
is the frequency of the oscillator , formed by electronvirtual electron system) and
so, we consequently get the density of substance building up electron. It makes out ( ) [ ]
2
0 0 0
/ / 1 e m
e
ω µ ϖ · .In the
arbital state, while electron is moved under the influence of the external field , it is possible to demonstrate that the
density of the electron substance is changed consequently to the law: ( )
2
2
0
1 / β ϖ ϖ
β
− · .If this density is multiplied
by the volume of the smeared electron in that condition we obtain: ( ) ( )
2 2
0
2 / 3
2
0
2
2
0
1 / 1 1 / β β β ϖ ϖ
β β
− · − − · c m V V ,
which is well known Einstein׳s of changing the electron׳s proper energy during its movement [ ] 15 . If the electron
were the point particle result of the left side would be zero, which is automatically in the collision with the theory of
relativity for the electron energy..According to this , it is completely clear that the electron cannot be the point
particle.In this case the questions are broadened:if it is not the point particle how big are its spatial dimensions, and if it
could have the spatial dimensions , consequently it could be one complex object.Our purpose is to introduce through
the work the possibility that electron may be a complex object , it means the object with internal structure. Until now
we suppose for necessity of symmetry, as an example within hydrogen atom, in the interaction between electron and
proton having three quarks and a repercussion on the stability of the atom, this offers the reason for existing inner
structure of the electron.
Before we pass to the commutative relations , from which we will get the compounded fractal parts of the electron ,
we bear in ouar mind necessity to comment the facts in the quantum mechanics accepted without explanation
automatically , and which one the observed interest has not be devoted. Namely, it is concerned by the known relation
for the operator of impulse and energy. To remind they are written the following wellknown relations : :
∇ − ·
i p
for
impulse and t i E ∂ ∂ · /
[ ] 12 , 11 , 10 . for energy. If the bozons are concerned the problem is understandable, the bozon׳s
spin is the wholenumber value derived from Plank׳s constant. But, if the fermions are concerned, concrete for electron,
why wholenumber value is still written of Plank׳s constant, since we know that its spin is equal to the half value of
Plank׳s constant? The answer may be single and it explains:in the wholenumber value of Plank׳s constant the spin of
electron is included which we observe according to the Schrödinger׳s or Dirac׳s equation or the commutators, and the
spin of the virtual electron, which we have not taken in the mind. The obtained theoretical results were in accordance
with the experiments, so it was satisfied.
In the following, it will be prooved that by taking into consideration the virtual electron we will get spontaneously to
the internal structure of electron.. Why the virtual electron must be taken into the consideration? The answer is in the
fact that the electron may not exist in the real world as an isolated particle, so it is always in the link with its virtual
electron; virtual electron is the part of the virtual pair electronpositron, and electron permanently has been followed
by ithat pair as its shadow [ ] 9 .
On the occasion of the “
th
100
Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron” [ ] 9 , a Russian physicist A.A. Bogus
says:”The electron, as much as 100 years ago, remains a natural phenomenon not completely resolved. By the time
being, strictly speaking, no adequate theoretical explanations have been found for parameters of most important
physical properties of the electron, such as; mass, electric charge, spin; they remain to be empirical characteristics taken
over from experiments”.
As we are going to discuss here about possible electron's structure, which was experimentally measured by Purdue
University physicists and others
{ ¦
, as well we are under the obligation to point out some of the circumstances, as the
facts not contributed to the theory of electron as the point particle. It would be useful to remind the problem known as
the Lamb's shift. It presents the energetic displacement of the electron within the hydrogen atom as the consequence of
the influence of the electromagnetic field vacuum on the electron. The theoreticians have found the solution for this
problem using the principle of the regularization, by defining the lower and the upper border line of the spectrum
integration with the method known as <<cut off>>.
After all, our aim in this work is to verify by quantummechanical theory the experimental data according to
measurements by Purdue University physicists et.al [ ] 10 , and then apply that theory on the possible internal structure
within “bare” electron as na central core of the complex electron..According to experimental data they stated following:
“All charges are surrounded by clouds of virtual photons, which spend part of their existence dissociated into fermion
antifermion pairs. Electron may not be a simple negative point charge, as previously thought; surrounding the electron’s
core is a fuzzy “cloud” of virtual particles, which wink in and out of existence in pairs. One particle in the pair is
positively charged, the other negatively charged. The cloud consists of polarized pairs which essentially cancel each
other out so that they do not “add” any net electric charge to the electron, Koltick say, the cloud plays a key role in how
we perceive the electromagnetic force from the electron. The virtual fermions with charges opposite to the bare charge
(electron) will be, on average, closer to the bare charge than those virtual particle of like sign”.
On the basis of such experimentally founded picture of the electron, our obligation is to form quantummechanical
theory, which would be to describe that experimentally facts.
Theory of the electron as a complex particle
So, we consider that, one bare electron and one virtual fermion from the virtual pair make together one pair. Such pair
(bare electronvirtual electron) is in the interaction with electromagnetic field of the vacuum. [ ] 11 . The spins of the
united electron and the virtual electron in the simplest case are antiparallel. We suppose that the electromagnetic field
of vacuum, which feel both bare electron and associated virtual electron, is the homogenous within the field exposed
through the middle value, as << cuted off >>on
B
c m B µ /
2
0
· [ ] 12 . The pair: bare electronvirtual electron presents
the boson which according to the rules of quantum mechanics applies Schrődinger`s equation (
0
m
mass of the
electron at the state of rest; c the light velocity in the vacuum;
−
B
µ
Bohrُs magneton).
We think that for the pair: bare electronvirtual electron, charged by 2e , we may describe their state at the rest, in the
cilindrical coordinate eystem, by the following Schrődinger's equation [ ] 16 , 15 , 14 , 13 , 12
( ) [ ]
Ψ · Ψ
+
∗
E
m
A e p
2
2
2
(1)
(where
∗
m is effecive mass equal to
0
/ 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 m m m m
ve e
· + ·
∗
,because we consider bare electron at rest and
therefore mass of the virtual electron
ve
m
tends to
∞
;
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∇ ∇ − ·
z r r
i p , , ;
ϕ
)
which solution is the wave function Ψ in the following form:
( )
( )
1 ; 1 , 1
2 0 ; 2 0 ; 0
4
;
2
; 1
:
2
1
2
1 4 / exp
0
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0 0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
· · Φ ·
≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ∞ < ≤
,
`
.

· · · Ψ Ψ
,
`
.

,
`
.

]
]
]
−
· ΦΖ · Ψ
∫ ∫ ∫
∫∫∫
∞
∗
dz Z d rdr R
r z r
c m
e
r
c m
X dz rdrd
r
X
X r
R
r
ϕ
π ϕ
πε
ϕ
π
π
(2)
as a key parameter for the calculation all physical electron׳s characteristics.Already the density of probability by itself
( )
2
0
2
0
2
2 / exp / 1 X r V − · Ψ · Ψ Ψ
∗
gives us very important parameter , and it is the volume which is encompassed by
the smeared electron in the space of the Compton׳s wavelength.It makes out
( ) ( )
2
0 0 0
2 2 X r V π ·
.It is also possible to
determine it from the relation ( ) ( )
2
0 0 0
2 2 / / X r B H
B B
π µ µ µ · · .The distribution of the mass and the electric
charge of electron in this field is according to the Gauss׳s law
[ ]
, and the size of the volume depends of the state of
the electron in the relation to the external fields, so it is changed according to the law ( )
2 / 3
2
0
1 β
β
− · V V .Already in
that relation we noted the forbiden state as evidently
1 · β
, because it is in collision with theory of relativity , from
here we can draw the conclusion of the impossibility to obtain the zero volume for
1 · β
; it means that the electron
cannot be the point particle, because the point particle according to the mathematical definition of the point presents
the entity out of the spatial dimension. Another important link used for description of the electron is in the
application of Maxwell׳s relation for density of the electromagnetic energy on the electron.Namely, Maxwell׳
srelation for density of the electromagnetic energy is ( ) ( ) . 2 / 1 2 / 1
2
0
2
0
BH B E · + · µ ε ϖ As we know E and B are the
transverzal components of the electric and magnetic field of the photon.If we include in this expression the<< cut off>>
values of the magnetic field components H and the equivalent value of the magnetic induction (
e m H B /
0 0 0
ω µ · ·
;
0 0
/ X c · ω
is the frequency of the oscillator , formed by electronvirtual electron system) and
so, we consequently get the density of substance building up electron. It makes out ( ) [ ]
2
0 0 0
/ / 1 e m
e
ω µ ϖ · .In the
arbital state, while electron is moved under the influence of the external field , it is possible to demonstrate that the
density of the electron substance is changed consequently to the law: ( )
2
2
0
1 / β ϖ ϖ
β
− · .If this density is multiplied
by the volume of the smeared electron in that condition we obtain: ( ) ( )
2 2
0
2 / 3
2
0
2
2
0
1 / 1 1 / β β β ϖ ϖ
β β
− · − − · c m V V ,
which is well known Einstein׳s of changing the electron׳s proper energy during its movement [ ] 17 . If the electron
were the point particle result of the left side would be zero, which is automatically in the collision with the theory of
relativity for the electron energy.. According to this , it is completely clear that the electron may not be a point
particle.In this case the questions are broadened:if it is not the point particle how big are its spatial dimensions, and if it
could have the spatial dimensions , consequently it could be one complex object.
Our aim is to calculate, by using Ψ function (2), physical characteristic of the bare electron.First of all, we find rotor
of the magnetic field pair.
( )
0 ;
2
1
;
2
2
0 0
1 1
0
2
2
2
· ∇ ∧ ·
Ψ Ψ − · ·
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∧ ∇
∗
A r B A
m
A e
e J
H
z r
e
r
e e
r
H
e
e
z r
e
ϕ
ϕϕ
(3)
.It is important to see, if we compute the effective value of the electrical current of the bare electron
( ) ( )
,
`
.

· ·
− ·
]
]
]
]
·
·
,
`
.

·
∫ ∫
∫ ∫ ∫
∞
∞
0
0
0
0
0
2
0 0
2
2
0
2
2
0 0
;
2
0
0 0
X
c
e dz rdr R H R
dz H dz dr J I
r
e
e
r
e
r
e eff
ω
π
ω
ν
ν (3a)
the Ampere’s law is satisfied.
If we use the vector potential of the pair:bare electronvirtual electron , which rotor is equal to::
( )
z e z e
e
z r
e
e H e rA
r r
rA
z r
e
r
e e
r
A
2 0 2
2
2
1
0 0
1 1
µ
ϕ
ϕ
·
∂
∂
·
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∧ ∇
(4)
we may calculate the quantummechanical average value of
( )
e
rA
2
:
( ) [ ]
e
rdr R rA R rA
e e
2
0
2 0 2
· ·
∫
∞
µ
(5)
Apparently, the electron's spin is equal to
2
2
·
e
rA e (6)
and quantum of magnetic flux is:
[ ]
( )
,
`
.

− · · ·
,
`
.

−
−
·
· ·
·
∫
∫
∞
2
0
3
0
2
2
2 2
2
2
0
2
1
2
2
exp
1
1
β π
β
π
π
ϕ
β
β
β β
β
β
β
β β
π
X
c m
X
e
dr r
X
r
X
B
r
e X
c m
S B d rA
e
(7)
Comment:no matter of the electron state in motion, its spin and quantum magnetic flux are constants.
In the simplest and generall case, when the electron is at the arbitrary state of motion, we may calculate magnetic
moment as a kinematical quantity by the following formula:
( )
2
0
2
1
2
2
2
β
π
π
µ
β
β
β β β
− − ·
− · ·
m
e
X
X
ec
S I
eff
(8)
Theory of the internal structure of the electron
Before we introduce expressions for the commutative relations of the subparticles, as the internal electron structure
of the electron, we should remind what they are the own values for the spin projections on the coordinate axes using
Pauli׳s matricies for the operator of the electron׳s spin [ ] 7 , 6
3 , 2 , 1 :
2
· · i S
i i
σ
( ) 1
where the Pauli׳s matricies are equal:
]
]
]
−
·
]
]
]
−
·
]
]
]
·
1 0
0 1
;
0
0
;
0 1
1 0
3 2 1
σ σ σ
i
i
( ) 2
The commutative relations are:
2 3 1 3
1 2 3 3 2
3 1 2 2 1
S i S S S S
S i S S S S
S i S S S S
· −
· −
· −
( ) 3
corresponding to the anticommutative relations
¹
'
¹
≠
·
· · +
j i
j i
ij i j j i
, 0
, 2
2δ σ σ σ σ
( ) 4
Let׳s find the solution in details for the first commutative relation in the system (3):
3
2
2 2
1 2 2 1
1 0
0 1
2 2 2 1 0
0 1
2 1 0
0 1
4
2
0
0
4 0
0
4 0 1
1 0
2 0
0
2 0
0
2 0 1
1 0
2
S i i i i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
S S S S
·
]
]
]
−
,
`
.

+ ·
]
]
]
−
·
]
]
]
−
·
]
]
]
−
−
]
]
]
−
·
]
]
]
]
]
]
−
−
]
]
]
−
]
]
]
· −
( ) 5
As it is evident we deliberately separated the Plank׳s constant on the two halves , in order to get the definite formula for
commutative relations , which one because of the unknown reasons have not be realized to the end..Now, there is
opportunity to write the definite formulae for commutative relations, by simple decoding of the formula (5), which,
before the final generalization, is written in the more complete following: form:
( )
3 2 1 3 1 2 2 1
1 0
0 1
2 2 2
S S S i S i i S S S S
+ · ·
]
]
]
−
,
`
.

+ · −
( ) 6
where
1
S
and
2
S
are the projections of the spin electron on the suitable axes , because as we very well know
3 , 2 , 1 , · i S
i
are the operators of the electron׳s spin projections on the axes׳s coordinates.
Now, it is possible to see the definite look of the commutative formula, so we are going to generalize on the system (3),
which complete form is the following:
( )
( )
( )
2 1 3 2 3 1 1 3
1 3 2 1 2 3 3 2
3 2 1 3 1 2 2 1
S S S i S i S S S S
S S S i S i S S S S
S S S i S i S S S S
+ · · −
+ · · −
+ · · −
( ) 7
It could get an impression that the relations (7) are formally correct .However, the mechanism of making generation of
the third operator is possible to achieve trough the spin of the electron
1
S S
e
·
including the spin of virtual electron
2
S S
v
·
. In that way the system (7) in the definite form would be:
( )
( )
( )
2 2 3 1 1 3
1 1 2 3 3 2
3 3 1 2 2 1
S S S i S i S S S S
S S S i S i S S S S
S S S i S i S S S S
v e
v e
v e
+ · · −
+ · · −
+ · · −
(7a)
The suplement of the commutative relations (3) with (7a) we had to do , because of necessity for making of the
commutative relations for the subparticles in the electron. It will be possible to see very soon that the commutative
relations introduced in the form (7a) could be applied completely on the electron subparticles.
Commutative relations of the electron subparticles
Therefore, as we said we will apply the system of the commutative relations (7a) on the electron subparticles, taking
into consideration the suitable subspins of the electron and the virtual electron expressed in the absolute values, never
mind of their mutual direction of the possible projections. With this observation we write the detailed commutative
relations of subparticles.Suppose that electron has three subparticles, which are described by the subspins, through
the fractal values
( ) ( ) ( ) 2 / , 2 / , 2 /
3 2 1
f f f
, where are
3 2 1
, , f f f
the unknowns which should be determined. In this
case we will have the subPauli׳s matrices
3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1
2
;
2
;
2
σ σ σ
,
`
.

·
,
`
.

·
,
`
.

· f F f F f F
(8)
.So, the commutative relations (7a) by the fractals would be:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2 3 2 1 3 2 1
2 3 1 1 3
1 3 2 1 3 2 1
1 2 3 3 2
3 3 2 1 3 2 1
3 1 2 2 1
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
σ
σ
σ
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + + + ··
· −
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + + + ··
· −
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + + + ·
· −
f f f f f f i
S i S S S S
f f f f f f i
S i S S S S
f f f f f f i
S i S S S S
(8a)
Let׳s write in details the commutative relation by which two subparticles, arbitrary choosen, with the fractals
2 1
, f f
generate the third subparticle with fractal
3
f
:
[ ] [ ]
( )
( )
0
2 2
2 2
3 2 3 1 2 1
3 2 1 2 1
3 3 2 1 3 2 1
3 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
· + +
→ + − ·
→ + − ·
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + − · −
f f f f f f
f f f f f
f f f i f if
F f f f f i F F F F
σ σ
(9)
Let׳s describe the relation (9). The commutator fractal 1. (one) and the fractal 2 (two) is equal to the sum of these
fractals in the electron and as the sum of the suitable fractals in the virtual electron , gives the third fractal. The similar
matter for the rest of the commutators , so it is possible to present the general formula for all three cases:
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
2 1 3
2 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3
1 3 2
1 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2
3 2 1
3 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
2
2
2 2
2
2
2 2
2
2
2 2
F f f i
F f f f f i F F F F
F f f i
F f f f f i F F F F
F f f i
F f f f f i F F F F
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ − ·
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + − · −
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ − ·
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + − · −
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ − ·
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
+ + + − · −
( ) a 9
As the result of the commutation two final commutators will give:
( )
( ) 0
0
2 1 2 3 1 3 2 1 3 1 3
1 3 1 2 3 2 1 3 2 3 2
· + + → + − ·
· + + → + − ·
f f f f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f f f f
(9b)
As first we have to underline the minus symbol is taken when the commutative relations in the normal order are
expressed by the Pauli׳s matrices. For example when each subparticle is followed by Pauli׳s matrices (9a) ; in the
other circumstances the symbol minus was not taken into the consideration . In the formula (7) spins
3 , 2 , 1 ; · i S
i
each
of them were the half of the Plank׳s constant, and in that way the electron is defined as the fullwhole;and so the spin
of the electron and the spin of the virtual electron are collected together, they had resulted as the operator of the
electron spin, described by the third arbitrary taken Pauli׳s matrix. However, the internal structure of the electron and
the virtual electron is composed of the fractals .We see how the operator of the fractal according to the third Pauli׳s
matrix is created :on::two fractals arbitrary taken in the electron followed by the subspins plus two equivalent fractals
of the virtual electron will “give birth“generate the third fractal with its own spin.
The fractals׳ determination
If we apply any of the commutative relations from the system (9a) we will get the equation of the same form, which
links the three unknowns:
0
3 2 3 1 2 1
· + + f f f f f f
(10)
which should be determined.
The fractals, mean the parts of a single unit, so it is clear that their total sum must be equal with 1 (one):
1
3 2 1
· + + f f f
( ) 11
The expression (10) we can find in the quadrat of the expression (11):
[ ] ( ) [ ]
( ) [ ] ( ) [ ]
( ) ( )
( ) 1 2
2
1
3 2 3 1 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3 3 2 1
2
2 1
3 2 1 3 2 1
2
3 2 1
2 2
3 2 1
· + + + + + ·
+ + + + ·
+ + + + ·
+ + → · + +
f f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f
f f f f f f
f f f f f f
(12)
If we insert the (10) into (12), we will obtain:
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
· + + f f f (13)
Now, it is absolutally clear, that the fractals have to satisfied the conditions of the three equations in the system
0
1
1
3 2 3 1 2 1
2
3
2
2
2
1
3 2 1
· + +
· + +
· + +
f f f f f f
f f f
f f f
(14)
The only solutions of the system (14) we find if we suppose that two of three unknowns are equal in its mutual relation.
Take, for example, on the arbitrary way that the first and the second fractals are equal in the mutual relation, then
system (14) becomes:
3 1
2
3
2
1
3 1
2
1 2
1 2
f f
f f
f f
− ·
− ·
− ·
(15)
If we change from the third relation the value of the first fractal into the first one , gives us the value of the third
fractal:
( )
3
1
1 3
1 4
1 2 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
− · → − ·
− · −
→ − · −
f f
f f
f f
(16)
and the first and the second fractal, which are mutualy equal, gives:
3
2
3
1
2 2
1 3 2 1
·
,
`
.

− − · → − · · f f f f
(17)
So, according to the commutative relations we got, that the fractals of the electron could be:
3
1
;
3
2
;
3
2
3 2 1
− · · · f f f (18)
Equation of motion
According to measurements by Purdue University physicists, electron may not be a simple negative point charge, but
surrounding the electron`s core is a fuzzy “cloud” of virtual particles, which are in pairs.One particle in the pair is
positively charged, the other negatively charged.Now it is clear why we write the impulse operator for the electron in
the form
( ) ∇ − ·
,
`
.

+ − · + − ·
i i S S i p
ve e
2 2
(19)
where
e
S
and
ve
S
are appropriate spin projections of the electron and virtual electron
Taking into account a hypotesis that both electron and virtual electron are made of subparticles, we can write the
impulse operators for the appropriate subpairs:two of them made of one subelectron and one subvirtual electron, and
the third is made of one subpositron and one subvirtual positron.For such pairs we may write the following formulas
for appropriate impulse operators;
∇ + · · ∇
,
`
.

− − − ·
∇ − · − · ∇
,
`
.

+ − ·
∇ − · − · ∇
,
`
.

+ − ·
3
1
2 3
2
2 3
1
2 3
1
3
2
2 3
4
2 3
2
2 3
2
3
2
2 3
4
2 3
2
2 3
2
3
2
1
i i i p
i i i p
i i i p
( ) 20
Using these operators () applies Schrődinger`s equations, because one pair made of electron and one virtual electron
from the „cloud“ behaves like a boson.This is reason why for subpairs we may write appropriate Schrődinger`s
equations of motion at the state of rest.These equations read:
( ) [ ]
¹
'
¹
¹
'
¹
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∇
· Ψ · Ψ + → Ψ · Ψ
∗
z r r
i E A q p
m
E H
i i i i i
oi
i i i i
, ,
. 3 , 2 , 1 ; 2
2
1 2
1
ϕ
(21)
where
∗
i
m
0
/ 1 is effective mass of the pairs, made of both subparticle and subvirtual particle, is equal to:
i ovi i i
m m m m
0 0 0
1 1 1 1
→ + ·
∗
(22)
because we introduce the condition
0 / 1
0
→
vi
m
at the state of rest.
Especially, for each subpair, which is in the interaction with the electromagnetic field of the physical vacuum
expressed by vecor potential
A
,we my write appropriate Schrődinger`s equations:
( ) [ ]
( ) [ ]
( ) [ ]
e q e q e q
E A q p
m
E H
E A q p
m
E H
E A q p
m
E H
3
1
;
3
2
;
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
3 2 1
3 3 3
2
3 3
03
3 3 3 3
2 2 2
2
2 2
02
2 2 2 2
1 1 1
2
1 1
01
1 1 1 1
+ · − · − ·
Ψ · Ψ + → Ψ · Ψ
Ψ · Ψ + → Ψ · Ψ
Ψ · Ψ + → Ψ · Ψ
( ) 23
in the cilindrical coordinate system.
( )
( )
,
`
.

,
`
.

,
`
.

− · ΦΖ · Ψ
,
`
.

,
`
.

,
`
.

− · Ψ · ΦΖ · Ψ
0
2
0
2
0
3 3
0
2
0
2
0
2 1 1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4
exp
1
2
3
2
1
2
1
4
exp
1
r
X
r
X
R
r
X
r
X
R
π
π
(24)
while energy of each pair can be computed by formulas:
(25)
To determine the distribution of electron charge and mass we will use the formulae for probability current density
( ) ( ) [ ] Ψ Ψ + Ψ ∇ Ψ − Ψ ∇ Ψ ·
∗ ∗ ∗
0 0
2
2 m
A e
m
i
j
(27)
Considering the fact that the wave function Ψ is a real function, equation (27) may be reduced to the following form:
Ψ Ψ ·
∗
0
2
m
A e
j
(28)
If we muliplay equation (28) by the subelectron rest mass, we will obtain the mass density distribution:
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
0
2
0
2
0
2
0 0
0
2
0
2
0
2
0 0
2
0
03 3
0
2
0
2
0
2
0 0
0
2
0
2
0
2
0 0
2
1
0
01 2
2 2
4
exp
2
3
1
2
4
exp
3
1 2
2 2
4
exp
2
3
2
2
4
exp
3
2 2
1
r X
X
r
r m
r X
X
r
r m
m
A e
m J
r X
X
r
r m
r X
X
r
r m
m
A e
m J J
m
m m
π
ω
π
ω
π
ω
π
ω
,
`
.

−
∧ − ·
,
`
.

−
∧ − · Ψ ··
,
`
.

−
∧ ·
,
`
.

−
∧ · Ψ · ·
(29)
The subspins are computed if we use the appropriate mass current densities in the following formula:
( ) ( )
( )
( ) [ ]
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) [ ]
( )
z
r
m
z
r
m
e
dz d rdr r r
X r
m dV A e r dV J r S
e
dz d rdr r r
X r
m dV A e r dV J r S S
,
`
.

− ·
∧ ∧ − · ∧ · ∧ ·
,
`
.

+ ·
∧ ∧ · ∧ · ∧ · ·
∫ ∫ ∫ ∫∫∫ ∫∫∫
∫ ∫ ∫ ∫∫∫ ∫∫∫
∞
∞
2 3
1
2 2
1
2
1
2
1
2 3
2
2 2
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
2
3
1
0
2
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 § 3
2
3
2
0
2
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 ! 2 1
π
π
ϕ ω
π
ϕ ω
π
(30)
By multiplying the probability current density by appropriate electric charge of the subparticle
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
3
0
3 3
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1 0 0
2
1
0
1 2
2 2
4
exp
2
2 2
4
exp
3
2 2
1
r X
X
r
r e
m
A e
q J
r X
X
r
r e r m
m
A e
q J J
m
e e
π
ω
π
ω ω
,
`
.

−
∧ + · Ψ ··
,
`
.

−
∧ − · Ψ ∧ · Ψ · ·
(31)
we will obtain subelectrical currents density.
To calculate Dirac's magnetic moments we will use the formulas from electrodynamics:
Differential element of the effective value of the electrical subcurrents are
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) drdz
X r
X
r
e
e drdz r e d j dI
drdz
X r
X
r
e
e drdz r e d j dI dI
e e
e e e
2
0 0
2
0
2
0
2
0 1 3
2
0 0
2
0
2
0
2
0 1 2 1
4
2
exp
4
2
exp
π
ω
ω σ
π
ω
ω σ
ϕ
ϕ
,
`
.

−
+ · Ψ ∧ + · ·
,
`
.

−
− · Ψ ∧ − · · ·
(33)
By integration (33) ones obtain effective values of the electrical subcurrents:
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
,
`
.

· ·
+ · + · Ψ ∧ + · · ·
− · − · Ψ ∧ − · ·· ·
∫ ∫ ∫∫ ∫
∫ ∫ ∫∫ ∫
∞
∞
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
2
0 3 3 3
0
0
0
2
3
2
0
2
0 1 1 1
2
3
1
2 3
1
3
2
2 3
2
0
0
πν ω
ν
π
ω
ω σ
ν
π
ω
ω σ
ϕ
ϕ
X
c
e
e
e drdz r e d j dI I
e
e
e drdz r e d j dI I
r
e e e
r
e e e
(34)
Rotor of magnetic field, directed along zaxism of the subpair :subbare electron and subvirtual electron, is equal to:
( )
2
1 0 1 1
0
3
4 2
3
2
3
2
0 0
1 1
Ψ ∧
,
`
.

− · Ψ Ψ
]
]
]
,
`
.

− +
,
`
.

− ·
∂
∂
− ·
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∧ ∇
∗
r e
m
A e
e e e H
r
H
z r
e
r
e e
r
H
z r
ω
ϕ
ϕ
ϕ
(35)
gives the electrical current density.Integral of the differential element of magnetic field is
,
`
.

− − ·
,
`
.

− − ·· ·
,
`
.

− − ·
,
`
.

− ·
∫
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
0
0 0
2
0
2
0
0
2
0
2
2
0 0
0
2
exp 2
2
exp
4
2
exp
4
2
2
exp
4
X
r
B
X
r
r
e
H B
X
r
r
e
rdr
X
r
X r
e
H
π
ω
µ µ
π
ω
π
ω
(36)
and rotor of the vector potential of the subpair is equal to the magnetic field induction:
( )
,
`
.

− − ·
∂
∂
·
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
∂
· ∧ ∇
2
0
2
2
exp 2
1
0 0
1 1
X
r
B e rA
r r
rA
z r
e
r
e e
r
A
z
z r
ϕ
ϕ
(37)
From formula (37) we find :
( )
,
`
.

− ·
,
`
.

− − ·
∫ 2
0
2
2
0
2
2
exp
2
exp 2
X
r
e
rdr
X
r
B rA
(38)
Spin of the electron will be, as a result of the averaged quantummechanical quantity:
:
e
rdr R
X
r
R
e
rA
2 2
exp
0
2
0
2
·
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
,
`
.

− ·
∫
∞
(38)
If we remind formula () we see that
( ) rA
should to multiplay by fractal
3 , 2 , 1 ; · i f
i
, so one obtains:
3 , 2 , 1 ;
2 2
exp
0
2
0
2
· ·
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
,
`
.

− ·
∫
∞
i f rdr R
X
r
R
e
f erA f
i i i
()
So, the subspins in explicit form are:
6 2 3
1
2
exp
3
1
3
1
3 2 3
2
2
exp
3
2
3
2
0
2
0
2
3
0
2
0
2
2 1
− ·
,
`
.

,
`
.

− ·
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
,
`
.

−
,
`
.

− ·
,
`
.

− ·
+ ·
,
`
.

+ ·
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
¹
¹
¹
'
¹
,
`
.

− + · · ·
∫
∫
∞
∞
rdr R
X
r
R
e
rA e S
rdr R
X
r
R
e
erA S S
The quantum of magnetic flux will be:
0
2
0
2 1
2
2
Φ · · · · Φ · Φ
∫
e e
d rA
e
π π ϕ
π
(40)
Taking into account that subpositron rotates in oposite to the subelectrons, one obtains:
0
0
2
3
Φ − · − · · Φ
∫
π
π ϕ
e
d rA
e
(41)
So, total magnetic flux on the level of the electron will be equal to the sum of the subfluxes:
0 3 2 1
Φ · Φ + Φ + Φ · Φ
(42)
Submagnetic moments apply the folloving formulas:
In accordance with (18) above, we obtain the following results representing the fractal values of the electron charge e
and the pertaining masses:
0 03 3
0 02 2
0 01 1
3
1
;
3
1
3
2
;
3
2
3
2
;
3
2
m m e q
m m e q
m m e q
− · + ·
+ · − ·
+ · − ·
(43)
From the standpoint of the energy levels, we may say that internal structure of the electron is composed of two energy
levels, namely: a higher energy level
2
0
3 / 2 c m + occupied by two identical subparticles of equal masses and electric
charges, and a lower energy level
2
0
3 / 1 c m − occupied by the subpositron. The difference between the two energy
levels is: ( )
2
0
2
0
2
0
3 / 1 3 / 2 c m c m c m · − − +
which is a value of internal rest energy of the electron.
We clearly see that the total energy of all subparticles in the electron is equal to Einstein’s rest energy of the electron;
this is automatically obtained if each term of the first relation in the formula
( ) 14
above is multiplied by
2
0
c m :
2
0
2
03
2
02
2
01
3
1
2
0
c m c m c m c m c m E
i
i
· + + · ·
∑
·
( ) 44
and the relativistic relation for the squared energy is accounted for, as well:
4 2
0
4 2
03
4 2
02
4 2
01
4
3
1
2
0
2
c m c m c m c m c m E
i
i
· + + · ·
∑
·
( ) 45
which is automatically obtained by multiplying each term of the second relation in the formula
( ) 14
above by
4 2
0
c m ,
which unmistakably speaks of a unique, yet possible, solution concerning the internal redistribution of energy of the
subparticles forming internal structure of the electron.
Iside of each pair of the electronvirtual electron there are the appropriate fractal parts of the Plank's constant:
h h h h h h h
3
1
3
2
3
2
3 2 1
− + · + + · (46)
and inside one electron and one virtual electron are:
6
1
3
1
3
1
2
3 2 1
− + · + + · S S S (47)
The reader may easily notice that the subparticle appears with a positive electric charge
) 10 2 6 . 1 ( 3 / 1
19
3
C o e e q
−
× + · + ·
and a negative mass, possesses a negative energy level
2
0
2
03
3 / 1 c m c m − · .
Conclusion
As we see there is not any similarity in the calculations of the electron properties based on the proposed mathematical
model of the electron as a complex particle, and that ones given in today physics [ ] 18 , [ ] 19 and [ ] 20 which have
thought an electron as a simple point charge. The obtained results (6), (7), and (8) are in agreement with the
experimental data, so in conclusion of this work, they may be considered as the proof:
a) That the electron may not be a simple negative point charge (bare electron), and we do not speak of the mathematical
concept of the electron as a point particle any more, as it was defined by Standard Model
b) Electron is a spatially particle, because the results (6), (7) and (8) are obtained by the space integration.
c) Electron in reality is not one isolatedbare particle only; bare charge is always followed by virtual electron, which is
the part of the virtual pair fermion antifermion from the “cloud”.
d) Electron may not be an elementary particle, but it is complex particle; it is consisted of the bare electron and one
virtual electron, where virtual electron is the part of the virtual pair fermion antifermion.
e) We agree with the Koltick's words:”The “cloud”, consisted of virtual particles in the pairs (fermionantifermion),
surrounding the electron's core (bare electron) may be to play a key role in how we perceive the electromagnetic force
from the electron” [ ] 10 .
What conclusion may be drawn from this mathematical model of the electron implying its internal structure? First,
the internal structure of the electron may be composed of three subparticles; two are identical by mass and negative
electric charge, while the third subparticle is positively charged and has a negative mass (since the mass is always
related to the energy, the concept of a negative mass should be construed conditionally; in fact, the concept of a negative
mass should always be identified with the concept of a negative energy level that makes a physical sense, (but it could
be mean as an atraction link between all subparticles), which reminds us of Dirac’s positron. Energetically speaking,
the electron internal structure is made of two identical subparticles
identical by mass and by electric charge and having the energy level
2
0
3 / 2 c m + . Therefore, this level is degenerated
twice. The third subparticle  the subpositron  occupies the energy level
2
0
3 / 1 c m − . How is it possible that the
electron remains stable when its internal structure is composed of the subparticles, where one of them having
opposite electric charge from the other two; Won’t one of the two identical subelectrons annihilate with the sub
positron, thus making the electron unstable, because the annihilation process would destroy its structure!
The answer is obvious: the subelectron and the subpositron cannot annihilate one another (the annihilation process
means the integration of two particles of identical masses, but of the opposite and the identical electric charges, which
leads to the transformation of their energies; they disappear, and, instead of them, the quantas of electromagnetic
radiation  light are emitted in the surrounding space) due to the fact that they do not have equal masses and identical
electric charges by the absolute value; the nature bans such processes as they would result in appearance of the
remainders in form of electric charge and mass.
References
[ ] 1 H. Dehmelt, Rev.Mod.Phys, 63(1990)525
[ ] 2 M. Kurepa and D. Filipović, Electron”, p.347, Serbian Academy of Sciences, Belgrade (2000)
[ ] 3 The Proceedings “100 Years from the Discovery of the Electron ”, p.8, The Institute for School Books and Teaching Aids, Belgrade,
1997
[ ] 6 A.S. Davidov, Quantum mechanics, “Nauka”, Moscow 1973.
[ ] 7 A.S. Sokolov et.al. Quantum Mechanics, (translation from Russian into Serbian), Naucna knjiga, Belgrade1965.
[ ] 8 M.V. Tokarev, zscaling from tens of GeV to TeV, Preprint of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, 2003.
[ ] 9 The Proceedings”100 years from the discovery of the electron”, p.8, The Institute for Schhool Books and Teaching Aids, Belgrade,
1997.
[ ] 10 I.Levine et.al..”Phys.Rev.Lett. vol.78, No.3. 424427 (1997). Purdue news, February 1997. “Research sheds light on electron's
structure”.
[ ] 11 Z Todorović and D.Todorović, Bulg. J. Phys. vol.27. No.1. p.89 (2000)
[ ] 12 Z.Todorović, University Thought, vol.4, No.2. 15 (1997)
[ ] 13 Z.Todorović, University Thought, vol.4, No.2, 22(1997)
[ ] 14 Z.Todorović, University Thought, vol.4, No.1, 83 (1997)
[ ] 15 Z.Todorović, University Thought,vol.4, No.1, 69(1997)
[ ] 16 Z.Todorović Doctoral Thesis, University of Pristine (1998)
[ ] 17 W. Reindeer, Special Theory of Relativity, Springer Verlag, Stutgart,1982
[ ] 18 W. Pauli, The Works in Quantum Theory,”Nauka” Moscow (1977).
[ ] 19 P.A.M. Dirak Proc.Roy.Soc. A vol.117. 610 (1928).
[ ] 20 J.Barden, I.N. Cooper and J.R.Schrieffer, Phys.Rev.
Vol.108.No.5
References
[ ] 1 H. Dehmelt, Rev.Mod.Phys, 63(1990)525
[ ] 2 M. Kurepa and D. Filipović, Electron”, p.347, Serbian Academy of Sciences, Belgrade (2000)
[ ] 3 The Proceedings “100 Years from the Discovery of the Electron ”, p.8, The Institute for School Books and
Teaching Aids, Belgrade, 1997
[ ] 4 M. GelMann, Phys.Lett, 8 (1964)214
[ ] 5 G. Zweig, Preprint, TH 401, 412(1964)ZERN
[ ] 6 A.S. Davidov, Quantum mechanics, “Nauka”, Moscow 1973.
[ ] 7 A.S. Sokolov et.al. Quantum Mechanics, (translation from Russian into Serbian), Naucna knjiga,
Belgrade1965.
[ ] 8 M.V. Tokarev, zscaling from tens of GeV to TeV, Preprint of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
Dubna, 2003.
[ ] 9 Z.B Todorović Doctoral Thesis, University of Pristina (1998)
[ ] 10 E. Schrődinger, Z.Phys. 14, 664 (1926).
[ ] 11 W. Pauli, The Works in Quantum Theory,”Nauka” Moscow (1977).
[ ] 12 P.A.M. Dirak Proc.Roy.Soc. A vol.117. 610 (1928).
[ ] 13 Z.B Todorović, XLV ETRAN Conference, Bukovička Banja  Arandjelovac, 2001, p.134
[ ] 14 C. Kittel, et.al.,”Berkeley Physics Courses”,Vol.14,Mc.GrawHill Book Co. New York, (1964)
[ ] 15 W. Rindler, Special Theory of Relativity, Springer Verlag, Stutgart,1982
The insights presented in the volume are many and wideranging, recognizably ...
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?