Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compiled by Ravi Shanker for National Workshop on Watershed Management, Ahmedabad.2004. CRD Gandhinagar. Ministry of Rural Development. Government of Gujarat.
Patterns of diversification
Very poorest- constrained into single activity Lack labor (husband, son), =goat, some agri.labor, =often cant migrate Insecure poor- diversify to make enough work days Marginal land, lower castes, =each member diversified, =relay on migrant agri. and non-agri labor, goats, =out-dated caste activity Less diversified, more agriculture Secure poor- diversify to mitigate risk Irrigated land, =each member specialized, =son in regular job, business or Modernized caste occupation, =milch cow
For majority of poor, diversification into many low return and non-farm activities Rich- diversify to get rich was both a response to crisis (excessive debt) and strategy to stay above Irrigated land, capital, education, FCs, =hiring, trading, money lending, destitution. Better off often diversified into high-return activities. Salaried jobs and politics Causes of diversificationrichest- specialize in commercial agriculture Very Households adopt diversified portfolios for one or the other reason.wheat, Large land, machinery, =specialized commercial Soya bean,
Horticulture and dairy
1. Spreading risk: Working in different activities helps to spread risk and manage uncertainities for poor. For example a familiy depending on own land,agri-labor, migration etc.
Diversification Reopened business Aminma is a muslim widow, aged about 60. When her husband died, her bangle shop closed for 4 years. Though she has land that lies outside project area hence not treated. She joined the Sangha Akkamahadevi. With 2 successive loans of Rs.5000 I have been able to reopen my store. During festivals and marriages bangles are sold again. After repaying the loans, I have made a profit of Rs.4000.-Aminma, Doddahalla village, KAWAD.
2. Coping with insufficiency Diverse activities may be undertaken to meet shortmcomings in main activity or contingency. For example: failed harvest, loss of job or medical/funeral bills. 3. Seasonality Some primary activities-collecting fruits, nuts, mushrooms depend on seasons. Crafts are also seasonal. Off-season activites (though lower in returns) are prefered to outmigration or unemployment. 4. Compensating for failures in credit markets Other low return actvities undertaken to fund the main activity/favored activity (Paddy crop) in may rural areas. This is prevelent when access to credit is not in place, or is on exorbitant terms. Such income is used as input for main activitybuying fertilisers, seeds etc. 5. Gradual transition to new activity Change to new activity is incremental when returns are higher. It is an addition to existing activities rather a substitute. Over time, if high returns are stable, it becomes specialisation. Initially they likely to be driven by necessity. 6. Building on complementarities Some diversified activities may build on existing skills, experiences and information. Thus home based part-time work may complement part-time domestic chores. Services, salons, dry-clean shops, cloth-trade etc are result of diversification. Here change depends on previous conditions and experiences.
Diversification options in MP and AP by caste and livelihood class The rich households had capital, skills, resources and networks to enter into money lending, hiring out tractors and agri.equipment, setting up business like poultry, dairy, aquaculture etc. They diversified for accumulation. The middle income groups able to access capital and build on their previous trade or services and micro-enterprises such as ice-cream making, groceries, increased livestock etc. They diversified to mitigate risk The poorest groups have little to draw on but their own labor so tend to diversify into casual labor in construction, road building, collecting non-timber products, keeping goats and rickshaw pulling. These diversify to cope with underemployment. Diversification through caste modernization occurred when a caste group adapted its role barber to hairdresser, carpenter to furniture shop.
Differences in access, opportunities and market returns Those at the bottom of the wealth, caste and class system have little other than their own labour, and generally unskilled and assetless. Thus poor being trapped by their initial lack of assets in low return activities that continue to prevent them from accessing the assets to escape poverty. Even when the poor participate in activities and markets, the encounter least favorable terms. Economic poverty and political disadvantage goes hand-in-hand and gets poor share in policy entitlements. How the poor get trapped into low returns
Cash-flow deficit Consumption needs exceed income Dependence on rich Patron client relationship established Borrowing on poor terms High moneylender rates
Contractual agreements in other markets on poor terms eg. Commitment of labor for low wages, land rental at high cost etc. Tied into low returns In different activities and markets
Dynamics of exclusion In Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh both poor and well off farmers practice sharecropping, agriculture labor and borrowing. But the better-off households can access high-return productive land, well paid labor opportunities and much more like to get formal sector credit at modest rates of interest. By contrast, the poor access only low return land, get low paid jobs, and invariably rely for credit on moneylenders or large farmers charging higher interest rates. As poor have no savings to fall back on, often forced to enter markets at the least favorable times (selling crops immediately after harves when prices are low). They also pay more for services such as credit and get lower returns (in sharecropping). Powerful patron can be helpful in times of shock but also set exploitative terms in serveral markets-credit, land and labor. The policy challenge was to establish forms of representation or awareness that incresed the political negotiating ability fo the marginalised.
Understanding livelihoods in rural India: diversity, change and exclusion. Manage June 2003. Compiled by Ravi Shanker for National Workshop on Watershed Management, Ahmedabad.2004. CRD Gandhinagar. Ministry of Rural Development. Government of Gujarat.