The 2002 Review by Robert Pascall and Richard Middleton. The 2011 Report of the Music Review Panel states in the 'Conduct of the Review' that the Panel were seeking to understand "how far the School had addressed perceived shortcomings identified in the previous 2002 Review", neglecting the how far the recommendations for the University in the 2002 Review had been addressed. The 2002 Review stated that "Since the increase in student numbers is predicated on a significantly stronger and more distinctive appeal in the market-place, the University should be prepared to make a strategic investment in staff posts in the short term; such investment would be in full accord with the aspirations and emphases in the Corporate Plan”. The authors of the 2002 Review stated that "Clearly this course was not followed; the
result is predictable (and the misuse of our report very irritating)". More information to follow.
The 2002 Review by Robert Pascall and Richard Middleton. The 2011 Report of the Music Review Panel states in the 'Conduct of the Review' that the Panel were seeking to understand "how far the School had addressed perceived shortcomings identified in the previous 2002 Review", neglecting the how far the recommendations for the University in the 2002 Review had been addressed. The 2002 Review stated that "Since the increase in student numbers is predicated on a significantly stronger and more distinctive appeal in the market-place, the University should be prepared to make a strategic investment in staff posts in the short term; such investment would be in full accord with the aspirations and emphases in the Corporate Plan”. The authors of the 2002 Review stated that "Clearly this course was not followed; the
result is predictable (and the misuse of our report very irritating)". More information to follow.
The 2002 Review by Robert Pascall and Richard Middleton. The 2011 Report of the Music Review Panel states in the 'Conduct of the Review' that the Panel were seeking to understand "how far the School had addressed perceived shortcomings identified in the previous 2002 Review", neglecting the how far the recommendations for the University in the 2002 Review had been addressed. The 2002 Review stated that "Since the increase in student numbers is predicated on a significantly stronger and more distinctive appeal in the market-place, the University should be prepared to make a strategic investment in staff posts in the short term; such investment would be in full accord with the aspirations and emphases in the Corporate Plan”. The authors of the 2002 Review stated that "Clearly this course was not followed; the
result is predictable (and the misuse of our report very irritating)". More information to follow.