P. 1
SEG Mock Up Verses SEG Prototype - Stages of R&D

SEG Mock Up Verses SEG Prototype - Stages of R&D

|Views: 29,569|Likes:
Published by Jason Verbelli

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Jason Verbelli on Dec 10, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/14/2015

pdf

text

original

If you download (for free of course), make sure to check back for revisions.

This is a learning process. I’m constantly adding diagrams, editing & elaborating.
Last updated - 08/21/15 @ 12:22 pm

Of what significance is the SEG Mock Up?

Have to go and look at John's claims.
Then isolate each claim and prove it out.
There are lots of concepts the Mock Up proves.
Look at it from an electric engineering point of view.



Claim #1: The SEG is a valid Motor/Generator Design.
What do you need in a motor/generator?
You need relative motion.
That means 1 part needs to be stationary (stator) and another part
has to move around (rotor/ magnetic rollers)

There are things called "vectors". 3 of them in this case.
Magnetic, Electric and Motion.
All of the vectors occur at 90 degrees to one another.
(3 finger rule - for Transverse Waves)

The Magnetic in this case is aligned axially (Top to Bottom).

That means the Electric must be Radial. (Planar)
From the center out, or, from the outer rim to the core

Therefore, the Motion must be to the Right (or Left)




What does that translate to?
As a radial electric current moves to Or from the stator, the magnetic
rollers must move 90 degrees to the side. That means, as a ring
shaped electric current moves from the rim to the core, or the core
to the rim, the magnets around the machine must orbit around and
move to the side. And indeed they do move to the side.
That function is inherent in the SEG design.
Claim #1 proved true. The SEG is indeed a valid design.
Claim #2: John says the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator.
As we can see in the mock up, that is also true. The rollers spin on
their centripetal axis as they orbit the stator. In the past, scientists
told John that the rollers must spin the opposite direction to the
direction they travel. Or that every other roller would spin CW, CCW,
CW, CCW. But simple observation proves that's not the case.
Claim #2 is proved to be true. The Rollers indeed spin together as
they orbit and in the same direction as travel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2YRy_Og6ME

Claim #3: The rollers will have no sound, won't touch and will float as
they spin around the stator. It’s obvious that the rollers will spin as
they orbit the stator as seen in the previous link. But how could they
spin around if they are pushed away from the stator from eddy
currents?
To demonstrate this, it required building an entirely different set-up
(which took thousands of dollars in itself and a couple months work.)


(Original – just copper ring spinning)


Normally, the stator is stationary and the rollers move around.
But to isolate the frictionless bearing effect, we inversed the rolls of
the parts. Rather than have the stator be positioned horizontally as
seen here…




we flipped the stator’s orientation 90 degrees:


(Remade w/ magnets under left ring to simulate the equalizing of
attraction/ repulsion between roller and stator)





And rather than having the stator stationary and the rollers spin, we
have the roller stationary and the stator spin.
That mimics the same relative motion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbpEwRsMj4w

With just a copper ring, we can see that as the roller makes its way
around the stator, it’s lifted up by the eddy currents. The roller is
prevented from touching the surface of the plate (stator) just as
John said.

Claim #3 proved to be true. That after sufficient RPM, the magnets
won't touch, won't vibrate, no friction, no sound, etc.
That makes for a device with moving parts that don’t touch. A
machine like that wouldn’t need the same maintenance as a
conventional motor or generator with oil, bearings, shafts, etc.

Claim #4: John says the rollers will Spin AND levitate.
Normally you can get a magnet to Spin OR levitate.
Take a Diametrical Magnet or Axial Magnet and put it next to a
spinning copper ring. You will feel a repulsion preventing the magnet
from touching the ring.
(Much like how all atoms of matter repel at 10^-8 centimeters.
Nothing actually “touches” on the quantum scale)
If you were to sit that magnet on top of the spinning copper ring, the
magnet would hover, but not spin. If you change the magnet’s
orientation 90 degrees, the magnet will spin but not hover. How to
make it hover and spin? A Bloch Wall is normally a “flat line/ 2D
plane” separating N from S.


Actually, it’s more like a Ring. Like a DVD.



Or, like the common wall shared between 2 bubbles.




Visualize the Bloch Wall acting as “a wave” rather than a "flat plane".
So, by simulating a wave on the Bloch Wall, it makes the cylinder
levitate And spin.





Lenz Law Experiments SEG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjB562_ZxZ4

Claim #4 is proven. Indeed the rollers will spin And levitate as they
orbit the stator. (But only with an added and/or simulated wave)
Claim #5: The rollers will remain equidistant, self align and stay on
track. This claim is self-evident. The rollers self organize from the
magnetic repulsion interactions, stay level around the stator, etc.



http://www.searlsolution.com/RotatingWire-Ver2.wmv
Claim #6: Magnetic waves can be imprinted onto ferrous materials:
Fernando Morris built other units to isolate this claim.
He also built his own magnetizer from scratch powered with many car
batteries in series. Over 1000 amps @ about 70 volts. Yikes! O_o









Fernando proved that indeed waveforms, glitches and variations can
be imprinted onto magnetic materials. The material seems to
“remember” the glitches. The magnet is made in a uniform fashion
which SHOULD result in a uniform field… but the field Is Not uniform.
There is not much literature in the scientific world to explain why this
happens. It shouldn’t happen, but it does. And we can plainly see
the results on the scopes.

Fernando built a unit to test it out as seen here:





The magnetic ring is made to turn. There are 2 compasses on either
side of the uniquely magnetized axial ring.
There is an analog gauss meter probe on the ring connected to a
digital oscilloscope. the scope reads out the waveform on the ring as
it turns. A normal Bloch wall would reap a flat line.
And the compasses on either side of the ring fluctuate as it spins
showing a variation in waveform and polarities. As seen here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_qWEAMAh3s
That right there is VERY different from other magnets.
(Not to mention the ring hops forward as you push it on a ferrous
surface) As seen here at the 6 minute mark to 8 minute mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JrC5hXqZpA


And here:
http://www.searlsolution.com/WHmagneticroll.wmv




Take note that we are way beyond coincidence now from an
electrical engineering point of view. There is enough reasonable
assumption to move forward in engineering a full scale prototype.
All of John's claims have proved out so far by isolating them 1 by 1
and showing them in the Mock Up.
The prototype combines all the phenomenon into 1 unit. But to do
that requires full funding and at least 18 months full time work.

Prof. John R.R. Searl proved to the media and officials attending his
lectures that magnets act in waves and not just poles.
Scientists have always maintained that the only method of
magnetization possible occurs with clear and discrete poles of North
and South. The industry has produced multiple poles on a magnet,
but always with discrete North/South polarity.

On May 9, 2005, at The Victory Hall, Aboyne, Scotland, Professor
John Roy Robert Searl demonstrated a magnetic wave pattern on a
Ferro-magnetic metal material, thus proving conventional scientist
wrong. This demonstration was witnessed by officials from the
Scottish Government as well as a member of the press. The entire
lecture was videotaped by a reputable production company from Los
Angeles California.

The tests demonstrated a magnetic ring rotated on test set with
constant rate and measurement taken with a gauss meter. The
readings steadily increased and decreased in an even and fluid
manner. Further tests were videotaped using an oscilloscope to
show the complete repeating wave form. This leaves no doubt that
the field that Professor Searl describes can be created and
duplicated.

The secret to making this wave pattern on a magnetic material is a
technical and proprietary process. This magnetic wave pattern is
used to create the Searl Effect Generator (SEG) and it is a
cornerstone of a new era in clean and sustainable energy.

We are now closer to replicating the Searl Effect with a working
prototype of the SEG. With the anticipated support, this technology
will reach the entire World and bring about an exciting new energy
age.
Page 429 from Prof. Searl's book "SEG Concept Review".







What is the S.E.G.?

The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) is a self-contained, electrical
power generator, able to produce clean and sustainable energy. It is
a magnetic prime mover that operates without friction and can
supply electrical power to suit both home and industry.

The core technology behind the SEG is referred to as the "Searl
Effect" which enables natural ambient sources of energy to be
converted into useful electrical power.

The SEG is based on magnetic fields that generates a continual
motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings that in turn
produces electrical currents and under certain conditions, a unique
gravito-magnetic force is also generated.

Electricity can be produced as pulsed DC or AC and hence, the SEG
can be utilized to supply power to existing electrical grids or supply it
on a decentralized bases, drive electric motors for cars or ships.

During normal operation the SEG generates very high electrical
potentials that ionizes the air and incidentally kills airborne bacteria
and viruses.

One function of the SEG is the emissions of negative ions to its
surrounding environment. This causes loosely attached
contaminants to be removed from the air by making them to drop to
the ground while the unit produces useful energy.

This is the health benefit of the SEG that can be utilized to purify
and cool the air. Rendering it as refreshing as spring water; ideally
suited for hospitals but can be used just as well for homes and work
places.

The SEG is a converter of nature's ambient sources of unlimited
energy and it does so without the use of fuels as it is commonly
known.



The SEG consists of three fixed stator rings that are uniquely
magnetized with patterns setup to generate continual motion of
similarly magnetized cylindrical rotors. The magnetic rotors or rollers
consist of eight segmented components made of the same four
layers of concentric materials that make up the stators. The rollers
have both freedom of spin and rotation around the stator which
generates both mechanical and electrical power.

The SEG is an 'open system' of energy conversion that is in
accordance with known thermodynamic laws; particularly as it may
apply at the quantum level. The open energy cycle of the SEG
enables it to function both as a prime mover of mechanical rotors,
but more so as an electrical generator that continuously interacts
and processes energy from the natural environment.

Incidental effects includes a halo of negative air ionization or plasma,
vacuum by extreme electrical charge, cooling temperatures of both
device and the local environment; also gravitational and inertial
anomalies under specific conditions.



Energy conversion while operating involves the processing of
random quantum fluctuations and kinetic energy within the atomic
lattice into coherent currents of electron pairs. These “Cooper Pairs”
form between 2-dimensional boundaries of different type materials.
Therein between surface boundaries, the Quantum Hall Effect of a
strong pulsing magnetic field facilitates electron transformations
(compression) that dramatically decreases the device’s temperature
with increasing mean free paths (conductivity). This occurs due to
the increase in fermion pair formations (bosons) tunneling through
all of the concentric material layers of the Searl Effect Generator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect

Energy out of the environment is typically chaotic (incoherent) but
pervasive at the quantum level, and we all feel it in part as ambient
temperatures. But this is just one source of ambient energy within
the electromagnetic spectrum which is in a random state. This
naturally occurring randomized energy is readily utilized by the SEG.

It is in effect, an unbiased solid state magnetic diode that can
effectively turn ambient energy into asymmetrical electron
motion out of randomness into a uniform state of coherent
currents, consisting of high velocity tunneling electron pairs
with photon-like characteristics.





The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) functions along the principles of a
linear induction motor (LIM), but designed around a circular track for
continuous motion of movable rotors. It is a magnetic prime mover of
electromagnetic multi-phased cylindrical rollers over fixed stator
rings and free of any mechanical wear or friction.

The SEG’s stators and rollers are magnetic components uniquely
magnetized or imprinted with matching magnetic pole patterns.
The neodymium layer serves as a source or reservoir of electron
charges that are drawn out by electromagnetic induction. These
radial currents though the rollers make for mechanical motion at
right angles to both the electric and magnetic fields.

The SEG configuration of rollers in motion, cuts through the
magnetic flux with a unique cycloid pattern that is superimposed over
an orbit around the circumference of the stator. In this manner, each
roller can also induce eddy currents of mutual induction between the
copper surfaces to form a frictionless ‘magnetic bearing’ as it
generates radial electrical potentials. Frictionless bearings enable
the SEG to operate without physical wear and thus it operates with a
service expectancy of a lifetime.

The generator consists of three stator rings (called Plates) that are
composed of four distinctively different materials concentrically
layered to each other and fixed to a non-conductive base.


Surrounding each of the Plates are rotors (called rollers)
constructed with the same materials but are free to rotate around
the Plates.





The inner most Plate typically has 12 rollers. There are 22 rollers on
the second stage and 32 on the final Plate. Surrounding the outer
most rollers are conventional electromagnets, which by way of
magnetic induction, taps energy out of the rapid passing of
magnetized rollers. These inductive pickup coils are connected in
various configurations to supply AC power at a variety of desired
voltage and current levels to suit residential or industrial
applications.

The SEG is defined as a device constructed of 2,124 component
parts that make up 3 plates and 66 roller sets. 12 of the 2,124
components make the 3 plates that act as reaction components.
2,112 components are employed to create 66 roller sets that also
act as active components. Each roller set consists of 8 segments
constructed from 32 components.

Each segment cannot be less than 34 grams in weight, as the Law of
Squares mathematical matrix defines the value of 34 as the lowest
suitable for the reasonable generation of electricity. Therefore the
smallest roller set must weigh 272 grams, making a grand total of
2,244 grams per roller set for the smallest surface bound SEG.

The SEG is a step up rotary transformer.
In fact it’s a 'three rotary transformer' operational system, within the
whole unit. The inner transformer output is fed in to the input of the
second plate which increases the output of the second unit
additively. The output of the second unit, in turn, feeds as an input
to the final unit, thereby increasing the final output to a very high
voltage. The electromagnet pick-up windings can be designed to
step down the output to a standard 240 volts at the rate of about 15
Kilowatts for a home unit.

From 1946 to 1968, and in John’s early newsletters, The Searl Effect
was referred to as ‘magnetic bubbles in motion’. In 1968, it became
clear that these ‘magnetic bubbles’ contained particles in a set
manner, and that there was a set pattern to how many bubbles were
present in the material. Because of this finding, Searl dropped the
term ‘magnetic bubbles’ and replaced it with the term ‘magnetic
quantum material’.

Professor Searl then released these details in a newsletter which
has since been reproduced in one of his books a few years ago. A
laboratory examination also agrees that somehow the material
“changes its state” when produced in this manner.

When the rollers are brought into close proximity to the SEG plate,
the Searl Effect resonant magnetic field causes electrons to be
drawn in to and accelerated through the machine. This process is
assisted by the highly electron-attracting or capturing effect of the
neodymium layer.

The unique mechanical and material arrangement of the SEG pulses
the neodymium to continually release and replace the surplus
electrons that provides both mechanical and electrical power.






I take the “magnetic waves” imprinted on the SEG as being similar to
the physical ridges of a butterfly wing. (This is just my own opinion)
It at least serves as an analogy to know the importance of
absorption and reflection as it applies to Light, Darkness and Color.



Look into how a butterfly wing (ridges) interacts with light (photons)
and entertain the notion that a “magnetic standing wave” (ridges)
and electricity (electrons) might interact in a similar way. In the
regard that "electron" behavior of varying wavelengths around
normal generators can be compared the random motion of photons
from an incandescent white light; Whereas, the behavior of
"electrons" in the SEG act more like the photons in a specifically
colored laser beam. But these laser-like paths of bosons (coherent
currents) are only generated within the atomic lattice of the mass
making up the unit. Planar. And in the case of the SEG, radial.
The SEG is an absorber. Just as a butterfly wing absorbs all
wavelengths of light but only reflects the one its structure is made of.
Also look into the term "coherence" in relation to physics
The electric fields of the SEG are "coherent".










NASA explains coherence:
http://www.spaceplace.nasa.gov/laser/en














coherence
A property holding for two or more waves or fields when each
individual wave or field is in phase with every other one. Lasers, for
example, emit almost perfectly coherent light; all the photons emitted
by a laser have the same frequency and are in phase. Since quantum
states can be described by a wave equation, coherence can hold for
quantum states in general, though only among bosons. Coherence is
generally possible in physical systems that may undergo
superposition.

See also Bose-Einstein condensate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose–Einstein_condensate

Cooper Pairs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair
"Photons, Phonons, Electrons, Plasmons":
http://www.phys.org/news/2014-04-quantum-photon-properties-
revealed-particlethe.html

Standing Waves (ridges) and Interference Patterns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave

Wave Propagation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_(wave_propagation)



Butterfly Wings, Nanoscopic Ridges and Light:
http://benthebutterflyguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-makes-blue-
morpho-butterfly-wings.html

Optics of Butterfly Wings:
http://www.livescience.com/92-advanced-optics-butterfly-
wings.html

How a Laser works:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUEbMjtWc-A
\
Claim #7: The SEG "looses weight" after a certain energy draw.
Technically, the unit doesn't actually loose weight or loose mass.
The Earth's magnetic field competes with the superconducting
electrostatic field generated by the SEG; therefore, there is an
upward repulsion effect. (But only in specific cases)
The unit still "weighs" the same regardless, but electrostatic forces
prevent it from touching the ground once in an overloaded/
superconductive state. You’ll have to listen to Paul Murad’s interview
and see their technical data in their paper linked below.
Does a magnet levitating above a cooled superconductor “loose
weight/ mass?” Or is the magnetic field just pushing upward?
(There is 0 loss or gain of mass of either superconductor or magnet)

Meissner Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

Meissner Effect vs. Flux Pinning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyN8cSB7BWs

The “reduction of weight” claim is confirmed by Paul Murad and
Morningstar Energy Box as well as the Russians Roschin and Godin.
It cost Murad et all over $500,000 to achieve his results over the
course of about 6 years.

Paul Murad:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searl-
effect-generator.html

Murad Technical Data:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-Murad-
SEG-Replication.pdf
John says the coherent electric fields of the SEG are “laser like” and
the SEG “compress electrons" (transforms). The kinetic energy of
“electrons” is harnessed, cycled and recycled by the SEG much like
how the kinetic energy of water is cycled and recycled through a
hydroelectric dam. We can compare water to electricity in a number
of analogies, but major work has to be done to change the current
perception of what is thought to take place on the quantum scale.

Coherent electricity deals with bosons (pairs of electrons
“traveling”/propagating as One in 1 direction); whereas, incoherent
electricity deals with fermions (single and traveling in varying
directions. Clashing with turbulence and loosing internal kinetic
energy.) Bosons only occur at low temperatures and in coherent
states. Also only occur in a planar field. (ordered/ uniform/ in phase
on 1 plane. “2D”.) “Particles” in phase can’t interfere with each other
and don’t loose internal kinetic energy.
I liken the process of Cooper Pairs & Phonon resonance to a bolus
during paristalsis. A radial and symmetrical propagation in a wave-
like manner.

What mainstream tries to do is force coherence of quantum
“particles” by cooling a conductor until it becomes a superconductor.
By lowering existing incoherence to a tolerable low. Then you have a
simulated state of coherence between “particles” which leads to the
Meissner Effect (the lifting). If force cooling causes coherence of a
magnetic field and atomic lattice, and for every action there is an
equal and opposite… the inverse would be that the cold is a bi-
product of the superconductivity. Rather than the superconductivity
being a bi-product of the cold.

Mainstream superconductive research force freezes materials to
simulate the effect of coherence. which costs a lot of money and
energy to maintain at a constant. John Searl discovered a process to
actually magnetize a material to reap the effect at a constant as a bi-
product of producing electricity. Seems to be a mirror image of the
current processes by mainstream attempts at the oxy-moron called
“room temperature superconductivity.”

Force Freezing a material to simulate particles in phase and actually
being in phase are 2 different things. Imagine how much it would cost
and how much energy would be wasted from futilely trying to
organize incandescent photons to a coherent wavelength using a
giant Tokamak-like setup. Might be able to achieve it for a few
nanoseconds. Like the oxy-moron of “room temperature
superconductivity.” For a few pico seconds. Big whoop.

That's the difference between incoherent people using a standardized
magnetization process (the hard way) verses a coherent John Searl
doing it the smart way. One saying I learned which rings true is to
“work smart, not hard.”

Here's a video of an "anomalous spin" effect by a magnet levitating
over a ring shaped superconductor.
Most experiments I’ve seen dealing with Meissner Effects are with
pucks of YCBO and not rings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRby1Wilv-Q
The gentleman in that last video found that a NdFeB magnet hovering
over a ring shaped superconductor will start to mysteriously spin.

http://phys.org/news/2011-03-high-temperature-superconductor-
secret-phase.html#jCp

'In all known superconductors electrons join in pairs (Cooper pairs) to
move in correlated fashion through the material. It takes a certain
amount of energy to break Cooper pairs apart; in ordinary
superconductors, the absence of single-electron states below this
energy constitutes a superconducting gap, which vanishes when the
temperature rises above Tc. Once in the normal state the electrons
revert to unpaired, uncorrelated behavior.'



Russian Validations
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm

The Russians proved a proportional temperature drop more so than
Morningstar Energy Box has been able to achieve so far.
To isolate that claim would require a lot more funding; As well as, the
magnetic repulsion (lift effect) with increased load/ RPM.
There is more than enough validations and curiosity to justify
funding John Searl to rebuild a fully working 3 ringed prototype.
(But why fund some 3
rd
party without the info attempting to COPY
John Searl when you can support the man John Searl directly?)

Claim #8: The rollers speed up as an electric current is drawn.
What happens to a motor as you draw more current?
It speeds up. And indeed that's the case with the SEG. As more load
is drawn, more current flows.
But the SEG is a motor AND generator. (Though, it doesn't become
active as a generator until the unique waves are imprinted onto the
materials.)

The SEG Prototype inverses the roll of the Mock Up.
The Mock up delivers power to the coils from an isolated power
source from the outside in. The prototype guides “electrons” in
laser-like paths radially through the layers of the unit.

Quantum Tunneling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

The electric current goes from the center outward with Collimated
energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collimated

Regardless of direction of radial current, the fact is that the rollers
move faster around the stator with increased load.
The next stage and claim to prove is that the SEG generates
"electron emissions." But to test that means we need to make a large
stator ring, magnetize it to the specs, make the smaller components
to the specs and then have them move in relation to each other.
Only then will the SEG produce more measurable and impressive
phenomenon. To achieve that.... requires almost 2 years full time
work, being full funded with 3 to 6 million dollars and hiring a small
team of professional engineers. (That’s really nothing compared to
other scientific research projects.)
Mock Up vs. Prototype:

MOCK UP feeds power TO the magnets.
The coils in the MOCK UP send a charge FROM the Rim TO the
Center.





The PROTOTYPE inverses the role of the coils and magnets.
The PROTOTYPE receives power FROM the magnets and the
charge travels radially FROM the center To the rim. (The Magnets
don’t carry the energy like a battery but rather they direct the flow of
energy more focused and coherent.)
The EM coils in the PROTOTYPE are present only to COLLECT the
energy delivered from the moving magnets.



Magnets imprinted with variations do not behave the same. We can
plainly see the difference between White Light and Blue Light. We
can plainly see the difference between an incandescent light and a
laser beam.
But we cannot see the difference between magnetized materials Nor
can we directly observe the difference between incoherent and
coherent electric currents.



INCOHERENT | COHERENT
Also look into the brilliant work of Johann Goethe, who 100 years
after Newton, discovered more detailed properties of prisms, light and
dark spectrums. Visit these sites:
http://www.rainengineering.com/ether/Light&Electricity/light_and_elec
tricity.html

Goethe vs Newton:
http://aetherforce.com/the-tao-of-colours-by-doug-marsh

Light Dark & Color:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID0BSlfZyHU



There’s no way to tell what frequencies were used to make a given
magnet just by looking at the metal. You could stare at magnets and
blanks side by side all day and never be able to discern.
You might be able to see the difference between various colored
butterfly wings, but you won’t be able to see the difference between
electric or magnetic imprints.

All known magnets are made the same ordinary way. It works and
you get a magnet, but that’s all the industry knows and practices.
We want to finesse the magnets and fine tune it.

Modulating specific frequencies during a magnetization process will
result in a uniquely magnetized material, specific to that frequency.
It will function and resonate like a tuning fork at that frequency, but in
a magnetic and electric sense. Resonating with the very atoms
composing the SEG (their electrons) and make them behave
coherently as photons do in a laser beam. (When combined with the
other components of the right proportions and densities)

So far, my view is that the waves imprinted are fixed like ridges on
wings. But perfectly spaced unlike deviations on a wing or elytra.
Therefore, the magnets would be different than conventional ones.



“Random Electron drift” behaves wildly and unpredictably through a
conventional system with normal magnets. Directed drift in the SEG.

“Electron” motion in a normal generator can be compared to the
random motion of photons from an incandescent light bulb.
The Brownian Motion is chaotic and random.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion

Or the motion of “quantum particles” can be compared to the random
motion of water molecules in a mist cloud. Or even a raging rapid.
Same premise. There’s no order or uniformity to the individual
components of the media.

Though the total volume of water or electric current is being moved,
there is still chaos and turbulence amongst the collective “particles”
making up a given medium. Unless there’s coherence.
But normal magnets in conventionally made systems Do Not
generate coherent electric currents. Because fermions do not tunnel
through an atomic lattice.
Just as an incandescent bulb doesn’t produce a laser beam.
Compare the motion of water molecules in an industrial water jet
(beam) to the motion of molecules in a cloud of mist. The jet has
compression and the kinetic energy has focus and direction. The
cloud does not. Or compare the turbulent wind in the open
atmosphere to a jet stream or column of air.

The difference in motion of the particles is equal to the difference
between energy harnessed by John Searl’s SEG verses conventional
systems. In a beam of jet stream, there is more focus of kinetic
energy. That’s pretty much it.
Same energy, but one system has more focus because of pressure
and other variables.
Just as a laser beam is the same light as a bulb, just a focused and
coherent wavelength.

coherence
a fixed relationship between the phase of waves in a beam of
radiation of a single frequency. Two beams of light are coherent when
the phase difference between their waves is constant; they are
incoherent if there is a random or changing phase relationship. Stable
interference patterns are formed only by radiation emitted by
coherent sources, ordinarily produced by splitting a single beam into
two or more beams. A laser, unlike an incandescent source,
produces a beam in which all the components bear a fixed
relationship to each other.



What is the Power Source for the SEG?

One aspect to better understand is the proportional temperature drop
in relation to electric output. (Lots of work to be done mathematically.)
John encourages people to think outside the box and not necessarily
look at heat as a flow. From my understanding, heat is the product of
“electrons” losing/ transferring internal kinetic energy resulting from
incoherent quantum turbulence.

To feel temperature/heat means "electrons" are loosing energy from
constantly bumping around at random from any & all directions. That
Natural state of randomness is also known as Brownian Motion.

The more "electrons" “bump” around, the more kinetic energy they
impart, the more photons they eject, and the more heat is generated.
That's what heat is. A bi-product of "electrons" “bumping” around.
The more room “electrons” have to bump around, the more kinetic
energy they build up. And when they “collide”, it means the loss of
that built up energy generates more heat.

In a conventional system, “electrons” are stripped from an isolated
power source and are not replenished at all. So the electrons that are
left have progressively more and more room to bump around. Thus,
why heat is generated, resistance increases, etc.

The motion of “quantum particles” throughout Nature is in a state of
Brownian Motion, or, Incoherent chaos. The motion of “quantum
particles” throughout the totality of man’s conventional batteries and
machinery is incoherent and random.
I don’t know how to mathematically describe a scenario dealing with
the electrons themselves interacting in a state of coherence on a
quantum level.

There are 2 energy sources for the SEG. The internal energy source
of the cores and the sustaining energy source from the surrounding
environment. The internal energy source is the kinetic energy of
valence electrons in the atoms making up the rare-earth cores which
are constantly recycled on demand in proportion to load.

More load = more positive charge of the core, which in turn,
proportionally draws in more negatively charged electrons from the
surrounding environment. The attracted free electrons fill the outer
shell of each atom that lost its valence. Those newly replaced
electrons only remain for an “instant” before leaving their position in
the outer shell and making their way through the system. One leaves
and another fills its place. And at a constant rate (in proportion to
load.) Like people lining up single file and walking in step.

The SEG harnesses kinetic energy of “electrons” on the quantum
level much like how the kinetic energy of water molecules is
harnessed by a hydroelectric dam on our scale.





The SEG’s energy cycle is illustrated with this diagram as an open
system of energy conversion. Whereas the dam harnesses kinetic
energy with a liquid media, the SEG harnesses kinetic energy of the
electron media within the Neodymium metal reservoir. However, both
systems complete their energy cycles via the atmosphere and thus
harnessing unlimited ambient energy as open systems.




Searl Effect Technology effectively utilizes quantum kinetic energy
which involves the "electron’s" inherent ability to absorb and emit
energy at the quantum level with an energy cycle that can could
compared and explained in layman terms to the hydroelectric dam in
principle since both are driven directly or indirectly by entropy of the
sun's radiant energy.
A dam builds up potential and kinetic energy by way of cloud
condensation that forms rain and fills reservoirs, but does so only after it
has achieved a higher energy level by way of evaporation from ground
levels; whereas, the SEG utilizes its layer of neodymium as a reservoir
of "electrons".
The Teflon layer is analogous to the dam itself.
The Magnetic layer acts as the power plant making useful work of the
currents. (Magnets are not batteries though)
And finally, the copper layer compares to the water outlets seen jetting
out the bottom of a dam. Similarly, the SEG ram-jets electrons out into
the atmosphere.
At this point, energy levels of the water jets, or in the case of
"electrons", are kinetically reduced existing the system. Be mindful that
these discharges go Back to the environment to recharge!
Therein, ambient energy restores their energy levels up by way of
evaporation of water or as with the SEG, the uniform emission of
electrons to the outside air exposes them to atmosphere’s ambient
sources of energy or temperature which raises the electron’s
quantum energy levels back up to natural ambient levels.

Thereafter, the external sources of electrons attracted back to the
relative positive potential of the electron depleted neodymium layer
(reservoir). The energy cycle continuously repeats. It’s a process that
effectively strips kinetic energy out the of electrons before they’re
emitted. No different in principle to the energy cycle of a hydroelectric
dam where the kinetics of the water flow are harnessed.
In this manner, both ways gather ambient sources of energy that can
be processed and made useful for electrical applications.



This animation illustrates the pathways of electric charges in and out
of the SEG. The electron capture effect of the Neodymium layer with
its positive charge, attracts the electrons from the surrounding
atmosphere. These charges are kinetically energized at the level of
the ambient temperature outside the SEG.

Once these charges enter the SEG layers, they are paired and
directed radially towards the rollers. These are laser-like beams of
electron pairs (Cooper Pairs/ bosons) propagating through the rollers
which in turn drive them to orbit around the stator rings.
This process strips kinetic energy from the electrons before they exit
the atomic lattice making up the SEG. In principle, it is the same as a
hydroelectric dam, yet energy was harnessed into mechanical motion
by passing the current flow. Like water in and out of the dam, the
electrons move in and out of the SEG. Both systems utilize the
ambient energy currents as part of an open energy cycle. Both
systems tap onto sustainable energy sources from the outside
environment cleanly and effectively. However, the Searl Effect
Generator operates at the quantum level, making it far more effective
and not dependant on location nor weather conditions.



There’s an energy cycle in the atmosphere with water as an open
system. Just as there’s an energy cycle in the SEG with “electrons”
as an open system. Rain fills a reservoir like electrons fill the rare-
earth core.









The reservoir in the case of the SEG is the outer shell of each
neodymium atom making up the core. The valence “electrons” fill the
shell like water fills a basin.


The reservoir is dammed up to create pressure and potential.
There is weight and pressure from water on the wall of a dam.
Just as there is pressure from electrons on the dielectric Teflon layer.
(2
nd
concentric stator ring)



Dielectric materials and insulators act as a dam for electricity like the
water analogy.









Water from a dam is shot through holes/ slits/ pipes.
The pressure sends the water in jet streams. There’s coherent kinetic
energy of all water molecules forced to channel through the holes.



Analogous to how “electrons” tunnel through the lattice of the atoms
making up the dielectric layer. Fermions cannot pass through
insulators, but Bosons can. (Cooper Pairs tunnel through insulators
as photons tunnel through glass.)

Water vapor in mist form cannot “tunnel” through a penstock. Each
molecule making up the mist would cohere to the tunnel itself and
loose kinetic energy. But condensed (compressed) and pressurized
water (liquid) can tunnel. Pressurize a mist enough and it will
condense to form a stream.

(Realize that this is an analogy to get you to Think
about open systems and the REcycling of energy)


The hole in a dam forces the water out in a coherent flow which
focuses the kinetic energy of the water in a beam to turn a turbine.


The turbines generate electricity. The holes/ slits in the case of the
SEG are the spaces between atoms making up the dielectric layer.
The pressure compresses the electrons and they tunnel through as a
Bose-Einstein Condensate. (They are also additionally accelerated
by the impelling force from the magnetic fields permeating through
the mass of the other materials.)

The premise is like someone grabbing the front of your shirt and
pulling you forward at the same time someone else pushes your
forward from behind. Lots of kinetic energy there from the
simultaneous impelling on the front side & positive pressure pushing
on the back of “electrons” migrating radially through the system.



The water molecules floating about in the natural environment are in
a state of incoherence. Because of that incoherence, the kinetic
energy is distributed in a cloud-like state rather than focused in a jet-
stream. The flow of water molecules shooting out of a hole in a
pressurized dam is coherent. Which is like simulating a beam of
kinetic energy through a lattice. That same potential is all around us.
But it has to be dammed up first to create the needed pressure.
The mass of the unit will dictate ultimate output. Rule of thumb is 90
watts per pound. So a 15kW SEG would weigh about 168 pounds
without the housing or pick-up coils.

After the electrons tunnel through the dielectric layer, they're
accelerated radially outward in a planar manner by the uniquely
imprinted magnetic fields. The fields rapidly pulse as the rollers move
in a cyclonic fashion around the stator. The electrons are then
emitted by the copper layer out at the equator of the unit from both
top half and bottom half in a double torus formation.


The turbines in the case of the SEG are the orbiting rollers.



The kinetic energy of the electrons shoots out in streams horizontally.
(From every pore and space between atoms making up the dielectric
layer) But radially, from the center out.



Magnets move 90 degrees to an electric current which is why the
rollers orbit the stator in the first place.


What happens to water after it turns a turbine in a hydroelectric dam?



It eventually evaporates and becomes part of the incoherent
environment again. Which then precipitates back into the reservoir
completing the cycle. As an open system.





Likewise, the “electrons” in the SEG are emitted back out into the
atmosphere where they recharge and migrate back to the reservoir.
A complete cycle. Openly.


Water evaporates much like how the bosons emitted by the SEG de-
couple after being harnessed in the pickup coils. The single fermions
quickly charge up in the incoherent environment (outside the
boundary of mass making up the unit) and are then attracted to the
positively charged neodymium core once again. Then the cycle
repeats in a dual toroidal circuit. Radial emissions outward at the
equator and converging vortices at the poles. Nothing created or
destroyed. Only already existing energy cycled and recycled.





Compare to Walter Russell’s diagrams from 1926.













7









There is moisture in every blade of grass, every leaf of every tree,
and pretty much everything in the scenario in the above diagram
contains water.
Just as there is “electricity” in every bit of every atom making up
pretty much everything in the universe. As everything decays, it gives
the water back to Earth’s cycle. Same with all matter in the universe
in regards to emitting electrons as it oxidizes and decays.

Electrons are effortlessly drawn in by the field generated by the
interacting waveforms. The harnessed energy isn't "free" per say.
Meaning, the energy isn't just manifested from "nothing". It's a cyclical
conversion process.
The Sun and other stars bombard the Earth with light and heat and
incoherent fermions. 100% hits, but 70% is reflected. And other
energy is emitted by matter. The SEG recycles that wasted energy
called “heat”. Anything above absolute zero is “heat”.

Heat by definition is the collective loss of internal kinetic energy of
incoherent fermions resulting from Brownian Motion, random drift and
quantum turbulence. How can a unit that operates with coherence
generate “heat” which is the definition of incoherence? It simply
cannot. Order is Order. Disorder is Disorder. The 2 don’t mesh.



If you had your own hydroelectric dam to power your home, you
wouldn't have to pay for the energy it reaped once it was set up. In
that regard, the energy would be free, and perpetually sustained by
the natural environment.
Imagine the source of water in the next four images below coming
from a giant dam. How would this break the 2
nd
Law of
thermodynamics? As long as there is water pressure, you could spin
the generator. How would you possibly halt the totality of pressure
exerted on a dam wall short of breaking the dam itself?








Now image that hose directly connected to a dam.
You couldn't use more water than what is in the reservoir even if you
opened the spill ways and powered your house at peak all day.
The rate at which the Natural environment replenishes the reservoir
with rain is faster than what you can deplete in the totality of what is
dammed up to generate a few kilowatts.




"There is no energy in matter other than that received from the
environment." -Nikola Tesla

“Does the machine produce more electricity than
it takes to run it?”

No.
No 'Overunity" or magic needed. There is a proportional temperature
drop to electric output.
I'm not fond of the concept of a closed system producing "more out
than in". Or the concept of Any system "creating energy from
nothing". The SEG is an Open System though.






Just as a hydroelectric dam doesn't produce “more energy than
required to run it". What is the "input power" to a hydroelectric dam?
The already existing water is dammed up. No magic there. The
pressure is used to turn turbines. You get an equal amount of force to
turn the turbine as you have pressure built up. In this case, the
amount of “electron pressure” is proportional to the amount of mass.
There is no "input power" in an open system scenario like measuring
a volt meter with an isolated battery. Nor does the 2nd Law of
Thermodynamics apply to the totality of the cycle of an open system.

Just as rain replenishes the water level in a reservoir for a dam, if you
used energy in the SEG, the environment naturally replenishes the
valence of neodymium atoms making up the cores.
You are using energy which is being depleted, but AS you use
energy, it’s generating another field that attracts more energy to influx
the system at the same time. You don't say that the dam provides
"more energy than required to run it".

The density of the rare-earth used as the core will determine how
much is in the reservoir. (Like increasing the depth of a basin)
So you know the total output of a given unit by its density and mass.
Coherently made magnets in a coherently made system do not
generate the same incoherent fermions we're used to. And that
requires massive study. (which requires adequate funding.)

It’s the difference between the lack of kinetic energy of water vapor in
the atmosphere verses the kinetic energy of water coming out of a
fire hose. Big difference.
All known closed electric systems harness incoherent fermions.

It’s not the magnets alone that initiate a cycle and recycling of energy.
Nor is it the magnets alone that generate the pressure needed to
generate bosons. It’s the Entire system working together as 1 cycle.
Each component plays its role. Without it, there would be no loop.
The density of the Neodymium must be enough to maintain a large
enough reservoir of electrons for peak output.

If the density is off, it would to like trying to turn a turbine with the
force of water coming out of a hole in the side of a bucket. Rather
than with the force of water coming out of a hole in a large dam.



If the density of the Teflon isn't right, then it would be like having a
paper thin wall for a large dam. The wall of the dam will break and the
system will be compromised and flood with too much energy.
If the wall of a dam is too thick, the water will loose kinetic energy by
the time is makes its way out the hole. If there’s just a trickle of water,
it won’t have enough force to spin a turbine.

The kinetic energy from the "electron streams" turns the rollers with
so much force, the amount of resistance caused by drawing a load is
negligible in comparison. The amount of energy you can draw from a
given unit, (regardless of how large) wouldn’t deplete the total supply
of available energy in the grand scheme of things.

That cycle will sure last longer than Your lifetime! Think of the
grander cycle of energy. Think outside the box. And have an open
mind. The longest lasting energy systems are an open cycle rather
than closed/ isolated systems.

The “electrons” that power the SEG are the same "electrons" you feel
right now as temperature. Just as the water that powers a
hydroelectric dam is the same water you feel right now as “humidity”
in vapor form. There is a focused flow to turn the rollers. Without that
focused jet stream of “electrons”, the SEG would not function.

The SEG harnesses the kinetic energy of “electrons.”
Just like a hydroelectric dam harnesses the kinetic energy of water.
Doesn’t matter the charge per “electron”. Just as it doesn’t matter the
size of a water drop in a dam full of water.
The water has kinetic energy that turns turbines. Period.
The “electrons” have kinetic energy that turn the rollers. Period.
That kinetic energy is cycled through the SEG with “laser-like”
precision and force. Electrons are depleted, recharge, migrates back
and cycle again. Just like the cycle of water in the atmosphere, then
through a hydroelectric dam, then back out to the atmosphere again.

Water Jet (Straight H20 Beam) Photon Jet (Straight Laser Beam)


Radial Electron Emissions


The magnetic fields imprinted on the SEG are what make it active as
a generator. It’s also what creates spin And lift when the eddy current
effects take place. (If the waves were not imprinted, you couldn’t draw
any energy. The magnets would hover but not spin.)

You need relative motion to generate electricity. If the magnets didn’t
hover, there would be major friction. The speed of the relative motion
between roller/ stator would be severely restricted and the system
would break.






The unique field lines also serve as a route for “electrons” to
tangentially swirl as they’re attracted to the core.
(Like water down a drain. But from both top down and bottom up.)





The imprinted waves also serve to create pulses of current which
lead to the Quantum Hall Effect. A full blast and then nothing. Open/
Close. On/ Off. 1/ 0. Like constructive/destructive interference fringes.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/11/4/043030/fulltext





Again, it will take one top grade engineer with top grade software to
map the complex interaction of magnetic and dielectric fields.
Without the proper densities, the system will do nothing at all. Or it’ll
immediately overflow with energy and be compromised with any load.
Without the imprinted magnetic waves, the unit would just be a very
expensive paperweight. Or a very expensive homopolar motor that
needed a conventional battery or power source to make it spin.
If you connected pick-up coils to a conventional homopolar motor, it
would meet so much resistance as you tapped energy that it would
stop.
The electricity output from such a setup would reap incoherent
electric currents. The electric output from ANY system using
conventional magnets made using strictly DC will be incoherent and
heat up. Why?

Because all known electrical generators result in Brownian flow of
“electrons”. And all known electrical systems are closed/ isolated
systems where the power source isn’t replenished on demand in
proportion to load. (or not replenished at all). In addition, there are no
coherent currents through the atomic lattice of the mass making up
conventional generators. Conventional currents are incoherent. More
load = more incoherence. Definition of heat is quantum incoherence.

Rhetorical Questions:

How does one expect magnets to contribute in generating coherent
electricity if the magnets generating the electricity are made with an
incoherent current?

How does one expect for a system to “regenerate itself” (or rather,
have the surrounding environment regenerate it) if it’s an isolated or
closed system?

How has Hoover dam been able to constantly provide energy for 80
years? And why doesn’t that violate the 2
nd
Law of Thermodynamics?

How has “Karpen’s Pile” been able to run continuously for over 60
years in a Romanian museum without any visible diminishing of the
energy supply?

And lastly, how many Open System electric generators have been
developed over the last 100 years?

Have an incoherent person make an incoherent magnet in a
conventionally made system and you’ll reap incoherent electricity.
The force and efficiency of that conventional electricity is like
comparing the kinetic energy of water vapor in mist form to a jet-
stream of liquid water.
The difference in quantum kinetic energy harnessed is just like the
difference between a light bulb and a laser beam.
ALL known magnets are made with the same sloppy process of
hammering a metal with DC and high capacitive discharge.
The Only man known to ever imprint a waveform on a magnetic
material is Professor John Searl.
Just as all known electric generators don’t account for the density of
the materials making up the unit. And certainly don’t account for the
density of a system in relation to the amount of output.

Can Man create something that doesn't exist in Nature? Yes!
Laser Beams do Not occur in Nature.
It takes the conscious action of Man putting together components and
utilizing Scientific Rules to create a scenario Nature itself cannot
generate.

Combining a hydroelectric dam with an industrial atmospheric water
generator and tapping the natural energy cycle of water to harness
electricity doesn’t exist in nature either.

100 years ago, a laser pointer was “impossible.” All people knew was
the randomness of incandescent light. (Incoherence)

10 years ago, a beam of sound was “impossible”, or never conceived.
All people knew was the randomness of acoustic waves.
Most people have still never heard of Woody Norris and his
Hypersonic Sound Laser Panel. People know of his LRAD system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF9G9M0cR0E

Today, coherent electricity or magnetism is "impossible."
All people know are the conventional electric currents reaped by all
commonly made magnets.
The magnetization process imprints a material with a modulated and
tuned wave which manifests as a type of interference pattern.

When you spin it (in relation to another like magnet of equal imprint),
more interactions manifest. Just as a music box won't manifest the
song until it's spun. All the info on it means nothing until motion is
added relative to something else.

Are there different equations for the motion of "particles" emitted from
an incandescent source verses a laser beam? Yes.
Are there equations for the motion of "electrons" generated from
magnets? Of course. But most of those equations apply to Fermi-
Dirac rather than Bose-Einstein.

To suggest it’s Impossible for man to achieve such a feat is
pseudoskeptical. Ad antiquitam. To suggest John Searl's technology
isn't valid is like saying there's no such thing as a laser beam or that a
hydroelectric dam violates the laws of thermodynamics/ COE. etc

The field lines of standard magnets are incoherently zapped “onto” a
material during the magnetization process. That results in no spin and
lift in the presence of eddy currents.
How to get the field lines of a magnet to exhibit a swirl? Like water
down a drain or the phi spiral your hair makes on the back of your
head. When those magnets are spinning relative to another, there are
unique and complex interactions of forces at play.

To manufacture a system like that requires a different process and
tighter tolerances than what the current industry practices.

How expensive was it for scientists to figure out how to make the
world's first laser in comparison to the price of a light bulb you could
buy off the shelf?

How expensive will it be it to imprint the needed waveforms onto a
material of suitable composition and density, in comparison to the
price of a regular magnet you can buy off the shelf?
About 3 million dollars verses $10.

If the scientific community didn't "believe" lasers were possible, what
technologies would we be without today?
If the scientific community doubted Nikola Tesla’s idea of
hydroelectric power and refused to pursue it, we might have that
many more nuclear stations (and fall outs as a result.)

So many scientists in the mainstream community aren’t aware of
these concepts or the many parties attempting to advance the
understanding. Some of those scientists are aware but refuse to
participate in advancing the studies of controversial perspectives.
Because of the widespread lack of willingness, lack of education and
lack of open mindedness… what are we missing out on today?
It's the difference between Order and Chaos.
Coherence and Incoherence. Uniform and Random.
Taking the time, money and effort to do it right verses doing it quickly,
cheaply and brutally wrong. Ad antiquitam.
"Electrons" flow in a circular orbit around magnetic field lines.
All known magnets are made the same way with sloppy DC.
Zap the metal with a high capacitive discharge and you get a magnet.
Brute force and it works.

But we want to finesse the process. Tune it, modulate the current and
imprint waves like interference patterns. Create ridges and trenches.
Tracks and dots of poles in waves. Points of magnetism and points of
no magnetism on the same material.









Like helical gears made out of “magnetic waves.”





All known magnets are made the same sloppy way, not accounting
for the resistance of the current in the magnet and a lot more. All
known magnets have fields that are always “on.” Even binary code,
the most basic premise, requires On and Off. 1 and 0.

A magnet’s strength goes to zero as it approaches the Bloch Wall.
Then if flips. What if you can have full power and then off… Full
power and then off? The intensity of the field wont drop off the same
if you account for the modulation and pulses at specific frequencies.
Quantum Mechanical Coherence:
(Notice the expensive equipment needed for this research)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js4KptOXnng

Coherence Lecture UC Berkeley:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTkNSa-Ay5g

John Searl's magnets in combination with the specific densities of
materials reap different electricity than regular magnets in “a housing”
like a conventional system.

The difference in quantum kinetic energy harnessed is just like the
difference between a laser beam and a light bulb.
In a laser beam there is coherence and focus in 1 particular
direction. Lack of Brownian Motion. More order.
No bumping around of photons.

In a kinetic beam of electrons, there’s collectively much more energy
to impart. And without the waste heat and turbulence associated with
conventional “electron drift”.

But a general drift ! coherence. Just like the water molecules making
up a constantly flowing river are not coherent.
But if you dam up the river and create pressure… then the water
molecules shooting out of the hole will be coherent.

Even if a uniquely made magnet is spinning in front of a coil, you
can’t expect to generate bosons or coherent electrons. You need
pressure. You can regulate the spin of your motor, the gauss of your
magnets, the composition and dimensions all you want. But you will
not solve the randomness of the energy harnessed by the system you
threw together in a, cheap, quick and sloppy conventional way.
The Only way for the SEG to achieve an output of coherent electricity
is by manufacturing the components to the right densities and by
imprinting specific waveforms onto the magnets.
Otherwise, it's a paperweight.

Energy is not created or destroyed by the SEG. Energy is harnessed
as an Open System. Not a Closed System.

People need to look into the difference between an Open System and
Closed (Isolated) System and when the 2
nd
Law of Thermodynamics
actually applies. The 2
nd
Law of Thermodynamics applies to Closed/
Isolated Systems. Not Open Systems. Just as superposition doesn’t
apply to non-linear systems.

It even plainly states in the very Wikipedia link naysayers used to
post in a blindly bias attempt to invalidate the physics. But it’s They
who didn’t read their own links! And the info indeed Does validate it.

2
nd
Law Definition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics

The 2
nd
law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an
isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems
always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with
maximum entropy. (this is all dealing with INCOHERENT WAVES)

Closed System:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_System

Isolated System:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolated_system

Open System (in Same wiki link as 2
nd
Law)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(thermodynamics)#Open_s
ystem

Open System (Systems Theory)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(systems_theory)

Syntropy (Negentropy):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntropy

From BlazeLabs.com
http://www.blazelabs.com/n-perpetual.asp





The Zeroth Law states: If two thermodynamic systems are in
thermal equilibrium with a third, they are also in thermal equilibrium
with each other. This law has been introduced recently in the 20th
century, much later than the other three laws. It basically states that
when two systems are put in contact with each other, there will be a
net exchange of energy between them unless or until they are in
thermal equilibrium.

The first law states: In any process, the total energy of the universe
remains constant. It simply means that the amount of energy lost in a
steady state process cannot be greater than the amount of energy
gained. This is the only thermodynamic law that is not statistical, and
thus is considered the only secure law of present science. In physics,
this is known as the law of conservation of energy of isolated
systems. (Notice the hidden postulates: isolated system, and a closed
finite universe.) Nöether's Theorem, states that if a system has a
particular symmetry, there is a quantity associated with that symmetry
that is conserved.

By this theorem, the principle of conservation of energy is a
consequence of invariance under time translations, that is symmetry
in time. The conservation of energy law does not apply to systems
which are not symmetrical upon time translation or reversal, nor does
it apply if the system is not isolated or if the universe is not finite.

The second law states: There is no process that, operating in a
cycle, produces no other effect than the subtraction of a positive
amount of heat from a reservoir and the production of an equal
amount of work. This means that energy systems have a tendency to
increase their entropy rather than decrease it.

It is known however that a microscopic system may exhibit
fluctuations of entropy opposite to that dictated by the 2
nd
Law, and
so, this law is only valid for macroscopic systems or long durations.
Quoting Maxwell (who was also a thermodynamicist): 'The truth of the
second law is a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on
the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules.
Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being
violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small
group of molecules belonging to a real body.' (J. C. Maxwell, Tait's
Thermodynamics II, Nature 17, 278-280 [7 February 1878]).
The third law states: As temperature approaches absolute zero, the
entropy of a system approaches a constant, equal to null.
It is not usually stressed enough, the fact that there is a very
fundamental assumption in these laws, even in the first most 'secure'
law of thermodynamics, or what we usually refer to as COE
(conservation of energy).

They ASSUME a closed system, and are born out of pure
mathematics or statistical work, unprovable in the real world.
Unprovable, because no one has yet been able to isolate a closed
system. We are not even sure that the universe as a whole can be
regarded as a closed system, which is a strict requirement for the
conservation of energy law!

In fact principles such as uncertainty, and entanglement, would seem
to indicate that either it is impossible for a truly closed system to exist,
or that our idea of a closed system is not taking into account other
phenomena or energy exchanges which cannot be easily or possibly
isolated from our systems.
For example, one might consider a mechanical engine as a closed
system, and finds out that it's impossible to get two similar efficiency
readings.

This could for example be due to changes in external ambient
temperatures which were not taken into account in the first place. So,
in such a case, ambient heat must be taken into account as part of
the system.

But, still, we find that even at absolute zero Kelvin, the ground state
energy does not go to zero, and this means that other yet unknown
energy sources must be taken account, or at least have their
existence accepted by mainstream science, which is currently not the
case. And that's why the list of anomalous effects in science is getting
longer year after year.





On the quantum scale, all electrons and atoms and parts are in a
perpetual state of transition motion.
Some people say perpetual motion doesn’t exist. But they are
referring to relative motion between 2 bodies.
Not necessarily the motion of 1 body in space by itself. But that 1
body is made up of a bunch of other “bodies”.
And the smaller you zoom in, the more Brownian motion you get. Like
the white noise (static snow) on a TV.

Anything in nature above Absolute Zero (0 Kelvin) is in chaotic
motion. And there’s no where in the universe at 0 Kelvin. The coldest
part and deepest parts of space are calculated to be about 4 Kelvin
because of the influence from cosmic radiation and other forces.
So in that regard, all “things” made of atoms are constantly moving
regardless where its location is in the universe.
And that motion is random and chaotic like the static on a TV.
Constant resistance, turbulence, loss of energy and generating heat.



The point is that “electrons” and “quantum particles” are in a constant
state of motion and constantly “violating” our macro laws of
thermodynamics. Even in “a vacuum” (state of less pressure). Study
the perspectives of Nikola Tesla, Dayton Miller & Paul Dirac.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea








SEG -Theory of Operation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJX17LgBYaQ
Have to briefly explain about static electricity too . Positive and
Negative Charges. Static electricity is just as interesting as
magnetism.

A physical Magnet always has Positive AND Negative. Duality. Both.
In normal magnets, the North and South is Uniform. John Searl’s
magnets are Not uniform.

But an electrically charged object like static electricity has Positive
OR Negative. Look into an “Electrophorus” and have some fun. Or a
Van DeGraff Generator (with supervision). Awesome.

(I’m not fond of mainstream terminology like “electrons”, etc. Which is
why I’m always putting it in quotes. I lean more towards the models
and perspectives of Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, Ed Leedskalnin,
Dewey B Larson, Pier Luigi Ighina, etc.)

For sake of conversation… we have to entertain the mainstream
terminology. I’d like to eventually translate this pdf to Russellian
terminology, Leedskalnin’s perspectives, compare to Ighina, Keely,
Rodin etc. For now, let’s continue with the “accepted” terms.)

Please watch this video about static electricity to get a basic
understanding. SIA Static:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7XAWxaQvdk

Assuming you watched that and have context, we can continue
talking about charges of the SEG components and a bit on how those
charges interact. You need to be able to visualize it all in your mind.
If something makes sense, it’s pretty easy to visualize. No context to
make sense and you won’t be able to visualize it. People won’t
entertain a thought that doesn’t make sense. One by one, make
sense of every step along the way. Then the whole picture will make
more sense. If people can make sense of an idea, they are more
likely to support it.










Let’s compare the circuit of energy in the SEG to a hydroelectric dam.
A hydroelectric dam is an Open System. Rain from the open
environment fills a reservoir. Man dams up the reservoir to create
pressure and potential. The water is shot through holes which spin
turbines. The turbines generate electricity. The water shoots past the
turbines, evaporates back into the atmosphere which then rains down
and fills the reservoir again. No water was created or destroyed.
Only what was already present is harnessed in a Natural cycle.

There are 4 materials in the SEG.



\


The function of the Neodymium acts like the reservoir in the
hydroelectric dam analogy. But instead of water, the Lanthanide
(rare-earth) Neodymium is a reservoir for “electrons”.
To explain this, we have to use the conventional model of the atom
used by Bohr. (I’m more partial to Walter Russell’s Table of
Elements), but let’s zoom in on Neodymium.



The outer most “electrons” on the outer most “shell” are called
“Valence electrons”. The valence of atoms is how they react with
other atoms, and those “electrons” are sometimes easily stripped off.



There are extra “electrons” in the Neodymium’s valence. Neodymium
has a tendency to give up “electrons”. You can tell because of the
rate it oxidizes. Leave it out in the open air and it turns to dust really
quickly. Compared to iron. Leave it exposed to the air and it won’t
rust right away. Neodymium can oxidize so quickly, it’ll leave a
coating of powder within 24 hours. For some reason, those
“electrons” easily come off when excited by an electric current. During
operation in the SEG, when those valence “electrons” are stripped
off, ones to replace it are already lined up waiting to immediately take
their place (as an OPEN SYSTEM).

Let’s briefly go over the circuit of energy in the SEG again.
(It will really take a top grade engineer with state of the art software to
map the advanced interacttions during the SEG’s operation.)

AFTER the SEG is made according to the needed specs, and AFTER
it’s magnetized with the unique waveforms, what will happen?
Nothing will happen unless you put the pieces together and initiate
movement. When the rollers and stator are moving relative to each
other, THEN we get the chain-reactions, “electron emissions”, boson
formations, cooling effects, and “The Searl Effect.”

By giving the rollers a push, it will generate current. Once a current is
initiated, it starts a chain reaction that generates a dual toroidal cycle
of energy. That field attracts incoherent fermions and free electrons
back to the core. The rollers accelerate with monstrous force to an
idle speed. Much like opening the penstock to a dam for the first time
to allow the pressure through. What is there to stop a turbine in a
hydroelectric dam once the water is allowed through? A given size
fan blade will turn a given idle speed with a given amount of incoming
kinetic force. As you draw more load, it’s like allowing more water
through, which then spins the turbine faster in proportion.

As the waveforms are initiated, the magnets begin to generate
coherent currents. The valence “electrons” are stripped from the
neodymium atom.




Relatively speaking, the inner core is positive. (when in operation)




(Obviously need more help with diagrams and animations)

The neodymium core becomes positively charged. At the same time,
the neodymium is extracting free “electrons” from around it to
replenish the ones it looses. We are literally in a “sea of energy”.

The neodymium core becomes positive relative to outside the copper
ring. The extra “electrons” added to the air, ionize the air. Negatively.
Negative seeks positive.

The negatively charged “particles” (fermions) around the unit are
drawn to the positively charged core. They meet with the “electrons”
from the neodymium. The result is no longer thermionic.
They tunnel through the dielectric layer. (Normally fermions are
blocked/ reflected by insulators and dielectric materials. But cooper
pairs tunnel through insulators like photons through glass)

The bosons are able to launch through the dielectric layer. Like the
water coming out of the hole in a dam. There is a jet stream. The
“electrons” line up single file, in phase, in a “2D sheet”, uniform and
ordered. Planar and radial. Focused, unlike like incandescence.



After they shoot through the dielectric layer, they are accelerated by
the coherently imprinted flux lines of the rotating rollers. Then blasted
to the copper layer where they are emitted to the atmosphere.
(And/or coils which tap the energy at the periphery.)


After that, they encounter the incoherent environment. The boson
splits from natural chaos and disorder. They get charged up by the
atmosphere and as fermions, seek the positively charged core again.
That completes the toroidal circuit (dual)

(I know this is a really lame and crude attempt to diagram and
explain, but I’m working with what I’ve got so far. Just trying to give
you guys some context to understand and visualize. If I had better
tools to work with, I could present the information more effectively.)

Just so people are aware, the image on the next page is a prototype
version but without the uniquely magnetized layer.
(But how can you machine the other layers unless you know the
density of the magnetic material?)

You can do it for practice. So you know the steps to take when you
Do get the final densities. Can’t just jump into manufacturing an SEG
on the first try. You’ve got to do your homework on how to go about
handling the needed tolerances regardless of what they are. And
practice on materials before doing the real thing.

Notice the magnetic ring is in 12 sections though. It SHOULD be a
solid ring. But alas… no one in the entire world of manufacturing
makes solid rings of magnetic materials that large. And this is the
Smallest inner most stator for the smallest possible version of the
SEG (using these materials).

Can’t farm out this kind of work or outsource it. Have to do it in-
house. Would be a logistical and communications nightmare to try
and have others manufacture these parts at this point.

It’s not reasonable to impose the level of tolerances we need on other
shops. Just imagine trying to press a solid magnetic ring for a unit 6
feet in diameter. Or 60 feet. Or 600 feet. Or 6000 feet. It can be
scaled up as long as you have the capability of machining it.
The larger units would obviously have to be in sections















Some more context regarding Open System Dynamics:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-03/09/230-percent-
efficient-leds









You Cannot generate the phenomenon of the SEG, “electron
emissions”, and the more fantastic claims relating to coherence
without magnetizing the materials to the needed specs! AND making
the other materials with the proper densities/ proportions. No easy
way to go about that. No cheap or quick route. All focus has to sync

Took John Searl about 8 months of full time work WITH unlimited
resources, megawatts of power and access to a multi-million dollar
infrastructure for free. He was provided with teams of machinists and
factory workers at his availability each time he developed an SEG. He
didn’t have to pay rent, labor, utilities, medical benefits, insurance,
legal fees, materials, shipping, etc. etc.

Working with very limited resources today with 4 people on a shoe
string budget and not even a fraction of what John had originally… it’s
going to take a lot longer.

If it took John about 8 months with unlimited resources and all the
help he needed before… what will it take to purchase everything with
modern prices while going against the grain? It’s been like this for
quite a while. People have some silly misconception that John has
been working on the SEG non-stop for 60 years. He was only able to
work on it when the funding allowed.

If people have more questions, they can go through the links below:

FAQs:
http://searlsolution.com/contact2.html

Searl Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF9EBB4FBBA29759B

Pdf of Lecture on John Searl:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/134608782/John-Searl-and-the-SEG-
Presentation

Professor John Searl Album (Facebook):
https://www.facebook.com/verbelli/media_set?set=a.409237198301.1
84888.683583301&type=3

John Searl album (Photobucket):
http://108.photobucket.com/user/Therealverbz/library/John%20Searl

Paul Murad & Morningstar Energy Box Audio Interview:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searl-
effect-generator.html

Paul Murad Technical Data (which cost about $500,000):
http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-Murad-
SEG-Replication.pdf

Russian Validations (which cost a couple million dollars)
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm

SEG Background:
http://www.rexresearch.com/searl4/searl4.htm

Official Searl Sites With Lots of Info:
http://www.SearlMagnetics.com
http://www.SearlSolution.com/members/technology5.html
http://www.SwallowCommand.com/index-4.html
http://www.SearlAerospace.com

3
rd
Party Sites:
http://www.JohnSearlStory.com
http://www.SearlEffect.com/free/allaccess/allaccess.html

To give the SEG more mainstream context:

Ultra Efficient LED Tested by MIT
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-
efficient-leds

Cooper Pairs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair

Quantum Hall Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect

Meissner Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

Flux Pinning:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_pinning

Meissner Effect vs. Flux Pinning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyN8cSB7BWs

Brownian Motion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion

"Photons, Phonons, Electrons, Plasmons":
http://phys.org/news/2014-04-quantum-photon-properties-revealed-
particlethe.html

Geometrically Coded Magnets Behave Differently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6WC9hO_8wg

Curved Paths:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/bend-it-like-schrodinger-
beams-of-electrons-curve-around-barriers/

Butterfly Wings, Nanoscopic ridges and Light:
http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/15A.html
http://www.livescience.com/92-advanced-optics-butterfly-wings.html

Spin Transfer:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/11

coherence
A property holding for two or more waves or fields when each
individual wave or field is in phase with every other one. Lasers, for
example, emit almost perfectly coherent light; all the photons emitted
by a laser have the same frequency and are in phase. Coherence
can hold for quantum states in general, though only among bosons.
Coherence is generally possible in physical systems that may
undergo superposition. See also Bose-Einstein condensate.

Geometrically Coded Magnets Behave Differently:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6WC9hO_8wg

Correlated Magnetics Research:
http://www.CorrelatedMagnetics.com
http://www.maglatch.com
http://www.polymagnet.com

CMR YouTube Channel:
http://www.YouTube.com/user/correlatedmagnetics1

Single Wire Transmission:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcvSXQHvFLg

Tesla Transmission:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJimMDrmwrM

Gyroscopes:

Fran McCabe:
http://www.franmccabe.com/#!gyroscopics

McCabe Compilation (Read Description):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xYhrFgcyWQ

A 2.5 in lb 12/24 V rated DC motor spinning a1.5 lb, 6" D. Gyro
wheel can systemically output 31.5 in lb thru gyroscopic natural
and powered precession.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c74C2iTSIzI

Centripetal Force:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC5ZiJNZssk

Eric Laithwaite on Gyroscopes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCEJxO6V9g

Laithwaite on Gyroscopic Propulsion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU

Sandy Kidd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU

Gyro Says "No" to Newton:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTEVC22qAZg

Gyro Experiments Galore:
http://relmachine.blogspot.com/
Self Rotation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYK2-7kdtcY

The behavior of a single spinning wheel in gimbals is a well-
documented subject; however, the interaction between multiple
spinning wheels is less fully explored. Some researchers have
hypothesized that spinning wheels could be mathematically
modeled after electrical inductors, suggesting that the
interaction between multiple spinning wheels might mirror that
of multiple inductors in proximity with each other. The goal of
the current set of experiments was to examine the interaction
between two gimbaled spinning wheels with six degrees of
freedom embedded in one scaffolding and observe their
behavioral similarity to electrical inductors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camtPxBL-YM

Working Together:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IPtlYipB4w

Levers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdM2jWg2uEE

Pulleys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMx7nIIH9ik

Inclined Planes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ErI0QjNos

Wheels and Axles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7xu9O0miEc
















What Does it Take to Make an SEG?






In addition to the ridiculously elaborate magnetization process,
each component of the SEG needs to be made according to
Density. Not length, width and height. Or Diameter, Thickness and
Height. If the total tolerance of the 2124 parts are off on weight by 3
grams, the whole unit won't function and you have a useless
paperweight. That means the tolerance for each part is plus or
minus .05 grams! If you build all the components to precision but
don't have the magnetization down, you still have a useless
paperweight.
To make just the inner most neodymium stator ring will cost about
$15,000. (conservatively)
$10,000 in materials for solid steel to make the mold, then the labor
for a week’s work to make a 3D CAD for the mold on SolidWorks,
then CNC the mold. And any alterations later, etc.

All so the metal powders can be smashed into the needed size rings.
But no telling the mold will be right the first try, or won't crack under
the pressure of the 100 ton press.
Then it would require another 2 weeks full time work to make
another mold and another $15,000.
Machinists don't work for free. Costs about $45 an hour. Plus
machine and floor time, tool changes, utilities, oil, maintenance, etc.
Realistically looking at about $85+ an hour. 10 full work days. 8
hours a day. That's just for labor for 1 mold.

Might need 2 molds for Each stator set. And 2 molds for the smaller
components. That's 8 molds. Each one bigger than the next.
Need a mold for each neodymium ring and a mold for each magnetic
ring. 3 stator sets. Then the actual materials to mix and smash into
solid rings. Both big and small.

(This is for pressing powders. Pouring molten ingots into molds is an
entirely different process which is equally difficult and expensive. Yet
slightly more dangerous because of the volatility of rare earth
materials)

No telling you’ll get the right density with a given proportion of
powders. No telling you’ll use the right binder so it won’t crumble
apart. No telling that even if you hit the right density and it doesn’t
crumble or crack that it will retain the needed gauss.
If the gauss is off, you need to change the percentages of
proportions which might alter the size of the mold.
Which means you’d need to make another mold until you get all the
numbers you want.





And remember, it has to be repeatable so that all 2124 parts are
exactly the same. For that, you need a production environment.
Yes… to make even just 1 SEG since all the parts are the same.
There’s just a lot of them. 528 exact parts. Of Each 4 components.
528 x 4 = 2112. Then the 3 stator rings with 4 materials each.

Takes a couple months to go through trial and error until you
achieve a ring that can have all the numbers you want. Then you
know the dimensions of the ring after experimenting with the
densities, gauss, pressures, binders, etc.

Then you can build the rest of parts of the SEG around that.
But you have to be prepared for unaccounted for hurdles, expenses
and have enough funding for about 2 years full time work.
Could be more, could be less depending on the hurdles
encountered. And should be able to work not having to worry about
running low on neodymium, magnetic powders, copper, rent, labor,
insurance of all kinds, argon, tooling, utilities, handling legal and
corporate fees, shipping fees, taxes, accounting fees, etc etc etc.

Will cost about 3 million dollars at this point unless a cheaper
alternative is explored. But even to explore other options requires
funding. And the longer we wait, the more the economy gets more
expensive.

So, for those with the eyes to see and ears to hear...
Those with the electrical engineering experience to be able to realize
the design and function of the SEG...
For those who have worked on similar projects and who want to try
something different without repeating actions expecting different
results... The SEG is ready to be funded.
The ONLY hurdle is funding! The technology, theory of operation,
supporting validations, scientific articles, cooborating journals, and
known models all validate the SEG. From start to finish.






What is “Proof” and what are our priorities?

"Proof" isn't just an end result you buy off the shelf.
"Proof" is all the information and processes that make an end result
possible. For the people who can see "proof" in the process, we can
use your help, be partners, and make a team effort to bring this to
the world! For the people who only see "proof" as a final product
you can exploit... they will all be customers in the future.

So if CERN can justify hundreds of billions of dollars over the course
of decades to futilely search for proof of "god particles"... (that will
never power a house let alone an LED light)
Or if NASA can justify hundreds of billions of dollars over the course
of decades to continually search for "earth-like planets" or chipping
away at rocks the Martian terrain...
Or if the Federal Reserve can justify printing trillions of dollars to bail
out CEOs, creating fiat currency from nothing...

Then why not (with all the validations, interest and growing
evidence) shouldn't John Searl's project get adequate funding for 2
years of work? To prove himself right in a fraction of the time and
for a fraction of the price as NASA or CERN has come through on
any of their decades of claims.

John Searl and Fernando Morris have shown more tangible proof of
the SEG’s function and design through the Mock Up than CERN has
shown for higgs bozos, dark matter, black holes, etc.

You can actually feel the magnets with your hands in the mock up.
Witness the equidistant magnets spinning as they orbit.
See the eddy current levitation effects.
Feel the attraction And repulsion of the roller to the stator.
You can see and measure the waves on a ring using the probe and
oscilloscope.

The Russians and Morningstar Energy Box have provided their
proofs too. With all of that combined, and more, I’d say that’s a lot
more tangible proof in the mock up than what you can touch and
feel from CERN’s trillion dollar projects.
Blueprints to an SEG and Reality of Costs:

Nonsensical question. “What are the dimensions of an SEG?”
Nonsensical response: “What is the size of a composite that weighs
100 pounds?”
An object’s dimensions (size) are determined by its composition,
density and shape.

A block of uranium weighing 100 pounds will have significantly
smaller dimensions than a block of aluminum weighing 100 pounds.
The dimensions of a composite block of uranium combined with
aluminum would be dependent upon the percentages of the 2
materials.

To ask for the dimensions of “an SEG” isn’t a legitimate question
because there aren’t enough variables. Depends on what the SEG is
made of. Can be a number of combinations.
If you asked, “What are the dimensions of an SEG made of A, B, C
and D… that would be more logical.
But then you have to make sure A is a material that tends to have a
positive charge, B is a dielectric, C is a magnetic material and D a
conductive material. How many different materials qualify for ABCD?

The outer dimensions are determined by the density of the material,
composition and shape. We know the shape is a ring, so that narrows
it down. “Give me blueprints to the SEG.”
“I want to build my own SEG, what are the schematics?”
Most standard blueprints and schematics deal with outer dimensions
like Length, Width and Height. Or Diameter, Thickness and Height.

If you want to build a speaker box for your trunk, the box must have a
certain amount of internal volume regardless of what the box is made
of or what shape it is.

Nonsensical question: “What is the shape of an enclosure that has
100 cubic feet of volume in it?”
Nonsensical question: “How big is an SEG that weighs 100 pounds?”
Depends on the materials.
An SEG is built according to density.
The outer dimensions will be determined by the materials used.
The size can vary just as much as the difference in size between a
pound of styrofoam and a pound of gold.

You can build a cube shaped speaker box out of wood with 100
internal cubic feet of volume, or you can make a box out of acrylic, or
steel, or gold, or a combination of materials, etc. The internal volume
will be 100 cubic feet regardless of the materials used or outer
shape.
But depending on what materials you use will determine how heavy
the box is.
A 100 cubic foot box made of gold is much more dense than a box
made of plywood even though the internal volume might be the same.
And both will have significantly different costs.

Regardless what materials qualify for A, B, C, and D… when you put
them together, they need to equal a certain density.
And depending on what you use will determine the overall
dimensions.

3 out of 4 most cost effective, available and “easiest” materials to
machine on the market to build an SEG are Neodymium, Teflon, and
Copper.
The density of a gram of neodymium, Teflon and copper are all
known and relatively “easy” to calculate. But if made in a composite,
the only way to test it is to make it, weigh it, measure the volume and
calculate the density with math. That takes trial and error and/ or one
heck of a software programmer. (which takes funding)

If you wanted an SEG to weigh Exactly 100 pounds, you’d have to
know how much of each material to use. And the amount of the
material will dictate the dimensions.


The more you mix percentages of materials in a given A, B, C or D
component will make it that much more difficult to calculate.

If you used Aluminum rather than copper for D, then the diameter of
the SEG would be significantly bigger since the weight and density of
the SEG must always remain the same no matter what materials you
use. Just like the internal volume of a speaker box must always be a
specific amount regardless of the shape or materials used.

So if you substitute aluminum for copper, you might need to change
the size of all the other components too.
Change 1 thing means to change all other 2123 parts equally.
And if you use a lighter material, you have to make sure that your
CNC lathe can handle the diameters, or your equipment is capable of
handling the large rings.
Just because you have access to a machine shop doesn’t mean you
have the capability to make an SEG.
And if you do have the capability in 1 area, you probably won’t in
another, since it takes a multi-million dollar infrastructure (as John
originally had)

Knowing the density of a magnetic material is difficult. The magnetic
material in the SEG is made of a unique mix of metal powders.
Depending on what materials used and in what proportions will
determine the magnet. (and size and density)
Can’t use standard epoxy or standard industrial binders. Have to stay
true to the materials and Law of Squares. (That’s another discussion
altogether)

You want to build an SEG huh?
What binder are you going to use? What is the density of that binder?
And how much will that affect the overall density, gauss or size of the
final result?
That can only be determined through trial and error. Research and
development. (which takes funding)

You might use 20% Alnico, 60% Ferrite and 20% binder.
Might be 22% NeFeB, 40% Ferrite, 5% Alnico, and 33% binder.
Could be 80% Ferrite, 5% binder, 15% Alnico.
How many combinations can YOU think of?!?
Could be whatever magnetic materials you choose as long as the ring
doesn’t crumble apart and can retain the needed gauss.
But you must know the density of the ring once it’s done because
that’s what you’re aiming for first and foremost.
And before that, you need to decide on whether you ultimately want a
unit that is really tall and skinny, or really wide and short? Or
somewhere in between.
The same density SEG can be a number of different sizes.

What metal powders are you going to use? Will your final result hold
enough gauss? Will it be too brittle?
Will your molds crack under pressure of the press?
All that can only be figured out through trial and error. Research and
Development. (which, again, takes Funding)

You could spend 3 weeks making a mold specific for a certain
proportion of powders. (at about $45 an hour labor *per machinist
with about $35/hr tooling changes, oil maintenance and utilities to run
the equipment. Not to mention the liability insurance, rent, and
medical benefits for the machinist or machinists plural).

But if you change the %, you might have to change the size of the
mold to account for the change in the ring. Then go back to making
another mold 2 thousands of an inch wider or shallower, etc.

Once you find the right magnetic materials to use and discover what
proportions work best… THEN you can know the dimensions of the
final result. And you must know the density you want to hit in your
final result before you try making it.

If you’re .05 grams off in weight for ANY of the 2,124 components..
it’s back to the drawing board, or back to the CNC lathe, or back to
compacting another ring in the press. (and hope your mold doesn’t
crack under the pressure, otherwise it’s going to be another week or
2 to make another mold. And that’s working full time. And not many
machinists work for free to repeatedly make molds.)

And you have to pay labor and utilities and rent, etc for every hour of
every day at the facility. That’s the reality of running a lab
environment.
The density and composition of the magnetic rings will determine
their diameter, thickness and height. THEN you can start to build A, B
and D rings AROUND the magnetic rings.

You can’t even start to CNC the other components because you
won’t know the dimensions until After doing months of research on
the magnetic rings. The magnetic rings are the heart of the SEG. And
that’s the most difficult part to tackle. (that and the actual adjusting of
frequencies, power and monitoring to magnetize the rings – That’s
another conversation)

Once you know the dimensions of the magnetic rings, you can build
around that.
But how much time, money and effort would that take for an average
engineer or person working in their garage to achieve?
Might take you $100,000 - $200,000 over the course of 3 to 6 months
Just In Labor alone with unaccounted for errors!!
More realistically, it might take $750,000 over the course of 6 – 8
months with all the monthly overheads. (Might take.. could be double,
could be less)

Have to pay for the industrial equipment and the power to run them.
And then retrofitting the building to handle the power, in addition to a
programmer and machinist to run the equipment, pay their labor,
liability insurance medical/dental, rent for the facility, utilities, legal,
accounting, kits of drill bits and tooling, materials, and costs that don’t
cease once you start R&D.

So you’d better have enough funds in the bank to cover a potential
year or 2 of full time work in a lab/ machine shop environment with
unforeseen delays, hurdles and overheads.
Can’t “just give blueprints or schematics” like average people would
like.

Most of the above mentioned was just talking about the small ring
segments! Not even getting to the large stator rings, which require A
Lot more work, much larger molds, etc.
Need 6 different molds. Each progressively bigger than the next for
the stator sets.

And then you need a CNC lathe that can handle the diameters of the
larger pieces to machine them into molds!
Do You, the reader, have the capability of pressing a 30 inch
diameter solid ring from ferrous metal powders? I doubt it.
Or the capability of smelting a solid 30 inch neodymium ring in an
argon environment?
Most of you will not.
Not even major Chinese manufacturers can press the large rings.
They can only do many small segments put together to make 1 ring.
And they only deal with ordinary epoxies with ordinary metal powders
in ordinary proportions. Their magnets are made with ordinary DC.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.”
And sometimes acquiring extraordinary proof requires extraordinary
funding. Especially if you’re using extraordinary methods with
extraordinary precision. Nothing is ordinary about the SEG and its
construction.

Even Nikola Tesla was provided with the means to make his
discoveries. His methods were extraordinary compared to Edisons’.
Without the means to experiment through trial and error… how would
an experimenter acquire the info? (How much has CERN spent to
date? And how close are they to powering your home, car or LED?)

The point of this section of diatribe is to give people some perspective
on reality. Reality of what it takes to manufacture an SEG part by part
and the machining hurdles and costs to do so.
The reality that you can’t just “give blueprints or schematics” because
building something according to density doesn’t have the same
“schematics” as building a box… or Anything using only outer
dimensions.

You can 3D print any object you want as long as the 3D CAD has the
algorithm or outer dimensions right? It takes time, money and effort to
develop the CAD first of all.
But what if you told the 3D programmer to add the dimension of
DENSITY to the CAD?
And better use a process that doesn’t alter the chemical structure to
much. And now the 3D printer has to have the capability to print the
same size object in different weights. Not just shapes and size.
How much more circuitry and capability would that require? A Lot.
To add another dimension of density to any building process takes
additional time, money and effort. 3D printers aren’t capable yet.
Then adding magnetics to the process is even more technical!

Aren’t the densities already worked out?

No, the densities and dimensions are Not worked out.
All that information of pressure ratios, proportions, percentages, etc
were never written down at the time when John first made the SEG.
The teams of machinists and factory workers went through trial and
error until they got it right.

If we want to rebuild the SEG, we have to start from scratch again.
(Which Fernando Morris has done since 2003 with the Mock Up and
what we have collectively done since 2010 to establish the research
and development facility in San Diego, CA.)

And even if you knew the proper proportions, you'd have to try and
regulate the particle size. You could take 2 scoops of metal powder
from the same bag and make 2 "identical" rings, but they might not be
the same size for the same density. Why?

Because varying particles sizes affect overall density and volume.
So even if you got it right in the past, it will still take you just as much
work to do it again. Even if you know all the numbers.
In this case, the numbers were never written down. And the info that
was written has since been burned.

All that remains is what is throughout the volumes of Law of Squares
books, but exact measurements and dimensions aren't given.
The original info is gone. Have to deal with it, move forward and do
whatever it takes to acquire the same information in a new setting.

John originally had the help of factory workers and machinists. But
they just did as John said until they achieved the result John wanted.
Today, we want to do the same thing, but in a professional
environment, document every step and make the process repeatable
for mass production.
Still need a mass production environment just to make 1 SEG.
There are 2124 parts to the SEG. 528 of the Same neodymium cores.
528 of the Same copper rings. 528 of the Same magnetic rings. 528
of the Same Teflon rings. That's 2112 parts right there.
So you'd better have a repeatable process to make sure All of the
parts are the exact same proportions, densities, weights and
volumes. If Any of the 2124 parts are off by .05 grams, the entire unit
won't function. If the rings chip, crack, crumble or break, you need to
try making more. And you can only make so many at once.
(If we had production facility and millions of dollars, we can make 528
at once and hope all of them turn out in the first batch)
Getting 100 good rings out of 528 tries would be more realistic.
People say "Just make 1 SEG before you try mass producing them."

But it takes a mass production environment to even make the 1!
Plus the 12 stator rings. Just because you make 1 ring to perfection...
doesn't mean the other 2123 will come out the same.
Might get 1 or 2 good rings out of a batch of 20.
Even if you know the numbers you want to hit, it's still trial and error
until you hit it. And then hit it another 2123 times. And THEN
magnetize 528 perfected rings.

But you only get 1 shot to magnetize a ring correctly.
At this point, we only have the equipment capable of making the
smallest inner stator set. To CNC the larger stators would require a
larger CNC. Which costs a lot of money. So... you could make all the
magnetic materials to precision...but then you have to magnetize
them to precision!

It's not like a VHS tape you can just record or magnetize over. So if
you spend money multiple times to make the right size stator ring
(just for the inner most stator set), there's no guarantee that you'll
magnetize it correctly the first try. So you'll need a few rings to test.

IF we were to make all the molds right the first try and get Everything
right the first try... it would still take months of R&D.
But in reality and machine shop, you don't get things right the first try
more often than not. You go through trials and you have errors until
you learn how to make it a success.
Which requires adequate funding and support.
Time, money and effort.











































Searl vs. CERN


This note could also be appropriately titled:

Academia vs. Quackademia Education vs. Indoctrination
Science vs. Psyence or Occam’s Razor vs. Nonsense

One of Professor John Searl's diagrams in print over 10 years ago
compared to latest "discoveries" by CERN and the so called "Higgs Field".


We"re going to go over the Higgs Model and why the explanation as it"s
presented is absurd and backwards. Phenomenon is real, but the
terminology and diagrams are sorely lacking.

In the Higgs diagram below, they show massive particles being generated
at the bottom by a massless particle on top. The arrow starts at the top of
the hill indicating that a massless particle somehow creates a hill by
curving space and then magically gains mass as it travels a straight path
down the hill following the vertical line.




So they"re saying that nothing becomes something. No mass creates
mass. Right off the bat, there"s already major problems that violate
common sense as well as their own conservation laws.
That ball on the top of the hill really should be red. To symbolize the nose
of Bozon the Clown.

In Searl's diagram, it shows the inverse. The rollers orbiting the stator IS
the mass at the bottom in the trough. But the trough of what?
Certainly not some non-existent curvature of space.
The blue lines in Searl"s diagram (which are cut off at the equator in the
Higgs diagram) are representative of magnetic field lines. Something real,
accepted, measurable, observable by anyone with iron shavings,
compasses, ferrofluid, etc.



There are satellite magnets orbiting a stator ring like planetary gears. With
unique magnetization resulting in high frequency waveforms. That when in
rotation at critical speeds generate a spiraling flux cone (frustum) for the
path of "electrons" 90 degrees to the tangential field lines propagating Up
the cone. Which causes them to converge and condense, accumulating
negative energy. (compressed “electrons”)

Part of the problem here is the model for the electron. It"s commonly taught
that an “electron” has mass. And a negative charge. So, if a bunch of mass
is converging and condensing, it should form a solid ball. But for every
positive there"s a negative. So, if there"s positive mass, then there must be
negative mass.

If positive mass is said to curve space and make a well…. then an
accumulation of “electrons” should make a well. Not a hill.
Therefore, the model of the electron is backward. (at the very least)
It should be thought of as negative mass with a negative charge. (The
math for a negative mass and positive charge works out the same as a
positive mass with a negative charge.) Look it up.



Hey… the concept of no mass generating mass… is stranger than uniquely
magnetized positive mass rotating to accumulate and condense negative
mass (electrons). That can be visualized and makes sense logically.

Rather than “virtual particles popping into existence because of a curvature
of space resulting from no mass.” (which contradicts their own logic since
their own model requires mass to curve space in the first place)

In their model, the massless particle bends space into a hill FIRST… and
THEN a massive particle is generated as a result. Does that make Any
sense? You don"t need a PhD to know that"s absurd. Any PhD who
believes that and tries to justify that with erroneous equations must have
Permanent Head Damage.






http://www.diracwasright.com




And where is the spin in the Higgs Model? It"s static.
I think the rings in their grid are supposed to be B fields
(which are oriented incorrectly 90 degrees).
I think the lines in their grid are supposed to be E fields.
They do not propagate out into space forever in straight lines or flat planes.



First a well with straight lines… and now a "hill" with straight lines on 1
plane that aren't even connected to anything. Magnetic field lines loop
around in 3 dimensions. The erroneous grid in the Higgs diagram
represents nothing in reality.

Nature is all about Spirals:


Animated Gif Static:
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n29/Therealverbz/John%20Searl/Toru
sFlowMed_zpsk0kmsxyi.gif


Animated Gif Dynamic:
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n29/Therealverbz/John%20Searl/ETor
usFlowMed_zpsidm5zxcy.giforiginal.gif



"All direction is curved, and all motion is spiral." -- Walter Russell

Where is the spin in Einstein's curvature of space model? It"s static.
They just show a straight well in a non-existent "fabric of space". To show
a spin in Einy"s curvature model equates to Frame Dragging.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging#Frame_dragging_effects
(which, in reality, is a lag in a rotating magnetic field)




Both the concept of Space curvature and empty space is a joke.
Casimir Effect proves that. Watch from 36:20 to 36:33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SiuTk2ZiyU#t=36m20s

Make sure to watch that entire link which elaborates on the signifiance of
magnetic waves and how they generate a BEC while in orbit around the
stator.








Quick question... Why is the curvature of space always shown at
Antarctica? Why never at the North Pole, or 90 degrees to the Equator?
How would they account for the multiple planes of Pluto's eccentric orbit
with their graphs?
It's all using straight lined graphs and talking about curvatures of space
and fabrics of time and dark matter and empty space and black holes and
Things That Do Not Exist!!!

Rotating superconductors exist. Plasma exists. Magnets Exist. Waveforms
Exist. Casimir Force exists, Coherence exists. Which reaps the physical
manifestations of the mathematical interpretations they want to achieve.
Is there a dense object in the center of the SEG?
No.. It's Hollow! But there's mass in a ring AROUND what they would
consider the "dense ball". O_o

Where is the mass to generate the magnetic fields for their space
curvature? A "massless particle?" Lol That sure makes sense.. O_o
If positive mass generates a well, then why would zero mass generate a
hill?
Wouldn't "negative mass" generate the opposite of positive mass? If a
proton is positive, aren't "electrons" supposed to be negative?
Wouldn't zero mass just be "flat" according to their own model?
Once you get to zero, that's it according to them.
No negative inertia. No negative mass.
So why then isn't the rest of their graphs just a bunch of gopher hills
randomly placed? Hey, there's no mass over there... let's arbitrarily put a
hill! Does that make Any sense people?!
O_o

Wait... let's look at that model for space curvature again...




Why is it flat away from Earth and the Sun?
BECAUSE THERE'S NO MASS ACCORDING TO THEIR MODEL!
So why not just have arbitrary hills everywhere else if no mass makes
hills? O_o

How come the graph (with what's supposed to represent the magnetic field
lines) just stops at the lip around the hill? Where does it go?
How can the graph represent space curving if they say space is empty?
O_o



Look at the Cartesian coordinate graph.



Did they forget elementary algebra? Draw a plus sign. +
The intersection is (0,0) Above the horizontal line is Positive...
Below the horizontal line is Negative... A “Massless particle” would be ON
THE ZERO LINE at (0,0). Not in any quadrant nor on any part of the X or Y
axis other than (0,0). Hey CERN... that means the ball below the horizontal
line is a NEGATIVE NUMBER. NOT ZERO.
Shall we go back to 1
st
Day of Pre-Algebra?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_coordinate_system






















uummm… Don"t the points on CERN"s graph fall BELOW the 0 line of the
X axis? That"s negative territory.
If No Mass means (0,0)… then what would (5,-2) be?
According to their own diagram, that means Negative Mass.










Open Letter to Professor Michio Kaku:
"You Could Be Sued for Millions and Ridiculed for Centuries"
May 15, 2009

Dear Dr. Kaku:
This open letter relates to your disparagement of energy-producing
devices which at this juncture in time are demonstrably critical to our
nation's survival. And I write this letter as a Ph.D. experimental
nuclear physicist with qualifications that I believe allow me to speak
to the subject in question, namely production of energy using
nonconventional means.

I ask that you read this letter carefully and ask that you not dismiss it
out of hand in the manner of many of our country's physicists.
Recently, on the popular late-night radio program, "Coast to Coast
AM," which reportedly has a listening audience of millions, you
indicated that investors call you up daily and ask whether certain
inventions will work. Characterizing those devices as "perpetual
motion machines" you said they were impossible to make. But that
can be proven to be a false statement. Such devices can exist if
negative mass electrons can be introduced into electronic circuits and
possibly certain machines.

They can also exist if other forms of negative energy can be created,
and apparently they can. Finally, it appears to be the case that gauge
transformations could allow such devices to work. This would not
involve a violation of one of the most important laws of physics,
namely energy conservation, either, Dr. Kaku. I believe you assume
that such devices do violate the laws of physics, which is also an
assumption that appears to be made by others.

Dr. Kaku: You appear to believe that the universe has 11 dimensions,
many of which are supposed to be hidden. Why would that be true
while creation of energy using negative mass electrons or using
gauge transformations would be impossible? Could you be wrong,
sir? Undoubtedly you think you are not wrong, but could you be
wrong, sir?



You might say to me that negative mass electrons have never been
seen. But those many dimensions you believe in have never been
seen either. And is it not true that we physicists for decades have
used negative mass electrons in our theories in order to reach
agreement with experiment? And wasn't the positron discovered
because Dirac invoked the existence of negative mass electrons --
approximately 80 years ago?
Perhaps it is true that we physicists have not yet observed negative
mass electrons, but does that mean they do not exist?

Now let me ask you this: Have you ever examined even one of the
devices that you tell investors cannot work? I suspect you haven't.
There are in fact inventions that produce energy without having any
kind of conventional fuel. You may see one work in a web page of
mine linked to below. But perhaps you think you don't even need to
look. Could that be the case, Dr. Kaku?

Perhaps you simply "know" these devices can't work. Might you not
also have said many years ago that airplanes could never fly? Before
the Wright brothers were flying airplanes, renowned scientists said it
was impossible. So, I ask that you examine the video linked to
below and I ask that you examine other such videos.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Step
hen_Mark_video2.mp4

(Please give the video time to load -- as the file is large. The small
black device shown in the video is producing the power. Then a
larger unit is shown.)

Here is the link to another web page of mine that has links to more
such TPU videos. I can assure you the TPU device works, sir. For
the sake of our nation and the world, I ask that you take the small
amount of time needed to examine these videos.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Steve
n_Mark.htm

Please don't say that the above demonstrations were faked, Dr.
Kaku. There are many engineers who examined the device. And
some demonstrations were made outdoors, far from any possible
sources of energy.
The TPU units shown in the videos apparently use gauge
transformations. Those would be the same kind of gauge
transformations that, for decades, you theorists have been telling us
allow for electromagnetic energy non-conservation, but then say
don't have any practical applications. And we know that theoretical
physicists are never wrong, don't we? So the device cannot work,
can it? So why then does it work?

Could it be that gauge transformations do have practical
applications? Could it thus be that theoretical physicists could be
wrong about the impracticality of using gauge transformations to
make energy? I think so.

Do not gauge transformations lead to electromagnetic energy non-
conservation? And is it not true that in your analysis of free energy
devices you assume that electromagnetic energy is conserved? That
is a grave inconsistency, sir. And arguing that gauge transformations
lead to no change in the electric and magnetic fields is not at all
convincing as the question relates to energy, not electric and
magnetic fields.

Would you say that gauge waves cannot exist? And if you do allow
that they can exist, would they not carry energy, possibly in both
positive and negative forms?

Where then am I wrong, Dr. Kaku? Or could I be right -- along with
many other Ph.D. physicists and engineers who are regularly
dismissed as crackpots?

You have said that you greatly respect the work of Nikola Tesla, and
surely you have studied his inventions and his life. If so, then you
might be aware that Nikola Tesla was planning to transmit power all
over the world in a way that you would surely say is impossible. But
you must know that Nikola Tesla was a very careful experimenter
who tested every idea before employing it. What then is the answer
to the implied dilemma?

So, Nikola Tesla was just a wild man, right? A nut. While Michio
Kaku and his 11 dimensions make wonderful sense. Or could you
and others be wrong about what Nikola Tesla was doing? Could it
even be the case that Tesla was using electromagnetic theory that
included the very gauge transformations that physicists of this era do
not include? Is that not possible, sir, and if not, why not?

Therefore, if I may speak freely, I would say that while millions or
even billions of people live in desperate poverty, and while millions
of Americans lose their jobs because we don't have this kind of
technology -- you tell people that such technology is impossible,
when it isn't.

Is everyone who disagrees with you and other leading theorists a
crackpot, Dr. Kaku? Was Nikola Tesla a crackpot? I would
strongly suggest that he wasn't at all a crackpot but was one of the
greatest inventors in the history of the world -- and I believe you
have also said as much. So why then would you dismiss Tesla's
ideas about free energy?

I must say that I have seen many smirks in association with
production of free energy -- Smirks -- while millions of Americans
lose their jobs and the United States falls into a terrible economic
decline. Smirks. Is that appropriate, sir? I would say not.

But the matter does not end with the above TPU units. There is also
the work of Thomas Henry Moray who was able to produce an
estimated 50 kilowatts of power from a tabletop unit that my analysis
indicates involved employment of negative mass electrons which Dr.
Moray apparently captured in very special circuits he built -- many,
many decades ago.

Here is a link to what I have written about Dr. Moray's work. There
are many more links on the Internet: Please do take the time to
investigate. A world desperate for energy waits.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Energy/index.htm

Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D.Experimental Nuclear Physicist

The URL of my web site is given below.
There is a link on the main page to my bio:
http://www.DoctorKoontz.com/

What is in between Casimir plates?




Is there matter so dense that it pulls the plates together?
No, there's nothing between the plates.
The plates are PUSHED together from the outside.
According to Einstein's model of gravity, (which he said isn't a force) The
Casimir effect would generate infinite curvature of space which requires
infinite mass at which point the entire universe instantly falls in the well and
is destroyed... Fail!
Casimir Force doesn't destroy the universe, nor does it generate infinite
mass or ANY curvature of space, nor is there dark matter in between the
plates pulling them together.

It's not that you generate a massless particle which then bends space
which generates massive particles... Lol

You spin massive particles with uniquely imprinted waveforms to generate
helical magnetic flux lines. And in rotation the "electrons" converge and
condense. Creating the PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION OF THE
MATHEMATICAL EQUIVALENT to "dark matter".

Only way to generate those flux lines I know of is through rotating uniquely
imprinted waveforms. In Searl's system, that generates cooper pairs.
(bosons) There is no Higgs Boson... Because a massless particle can't
make a hill out of space first of all. Misconception. It's an accumulation of
negative energy.

The tip to the Higgs Field Diagram shows a Compounded Spherical and
Rounded Cone. Like how they think a “black hole” forms a well with a
closed tip.

But there"s a major difference between a very tight conical frustum and a
closed cone. ABSOLUTE FAILURE!!!! Why call it a black “hole” and then
give a diagram for a closed “well” as if bending the meniscus of water?











The magnetic field lines converge tangentially. As an open frustum. Like
the Iris of a camera. Is there a ball of invisible dark matter at the center of
an iris getting more compact? That"s how absurd the model is.




That"s like saying the Pupil of your eye is compacted dark matter that
generates the iris and scalera and holds the rest of your eye together…
FAIL!


Someone needs to wake up the people at CERN! Siesta is over.
Time to circumcise the sombrero homes.






An open frustum cone is not a closed well. Sort of defeats the entire notion
of a “singularity”/ infinite densities/ dark matter/ curved space/ empty
space, etc. Should look more like a bundt cake mold.


STATIC “HIGGS FIELD”



DYNAMIC SEARL FIELD





Here"s another thing that"s absurd about CERN"s model.

To me… it looks like the math works either way if you turn the diagram
upside down. (Or look at it in the inverse)
How do you know that the so called fabric of space isn"t really being bent
by massless particles into a hill from the other side of the meniscus?
The model for positive matter again shows Earth in a closed well.



And they say the well is generated by the mass of the Earth…
But they just said a hill is generated by a massless particle…
2 sides of the same meniscus...

Why isn"t the Mass of the Earth generated by Massless particles by pulling
the fabric of space from the other side then?
Massless particles bend space now.. so why not state that all matter is just
the result of massless particles combining on the other side of the
meniscus of nonexistent curved space?

See how laughable this is?!
If 1 side of space sinks, then the other side must raise by my simple mind.

Sorta the whole idea behind looking at a parabolic dish from both sides. 1
side is convex, the other side is concave. 2 sides… same bowl.
If you state 1 thing… you have to account for the scenario in the inverse.

Can"t just have a well on 1 side of a meniscus without making a hill on the
other side by default. Is there only 1 side to a coin now too CERN?! Only 1
side to the bundt cake mold? Only 1 side to a sombrero?

If you make a divot on 1 side of a coin…. Then what"s on the other side of
the coin? A HILL…
If you have a divot on 1 side of a bundt cake mold… what"s on the other
side? A HILL…

So, by Einstein"s logic, there should be 2 worlds. 1 on either side of his
non-existent meniscus of the fabic of space.
AS matter makes a divot on this side, then simultaneously a massless
particle would be making a hill from the other side. Ok… by that logic,
which one generates the other?
Neither.. Why? Because the entire model is bullshit.

This is such a joke! Massless particles pulling the fabric of space into a hill
collecting matter NOT ONLY IN THE TROUGH OF THE SOMBRERO…
BUT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MENISCUS…

Absolutely Ridiculous.

CERN is trying to smash together 2 incoherent fermions in hopes of
coupling them together to make a coherent boson. (which they don"t even
label in their erroneous diagram.)
O_o

Are they insane!?! (They must be since they're repeating their actions
expecting different results. It's like a pathetic gambler who needs just 1
more loan. They have the formula to win this year right? What a joke.)

Analogy:
That's like pointing 2 flashlights with white bulbs at each other in hopes
that it will someone isolate a particular bandwidth and make a laser beam.
So they spend more and more money on brighter white bulbs. Expecting
that by intensifying current failures with a more expensive set up will
somehow reap their results. O_o

If the square peg isn't fitting through the round hole.... you don't continue to
push harder. You try something else... (I learned that all by myself when I
was less than a year old!)
In order to even generate their “higgs field”, you need to have something in
an orbit first. Then it generates the frustum out of magnetic field lines which
then tighten like an iris. Might be so tight that you THINK it"s a closed
convex or concave shell, but there"s a “HOLE.”
Not that there"s a stationary massless ball particle that magically pulls
space to a hill to make a sombrero (while simultaneously mass is pushing
a well on the other side to fill the hat).
And then 1 ball particle of mass is generated in the trough of the sombrero.
Even in their diagram they show TWO divots but only 1 stationary ball…

Which means that 1 ball would need to orbit on the Z axis around the Y
Axis while maintaining the same plane on the X axis at ( , -2). But always
staying 5 points away from the fulcrum/ shaft of the Y axis according to this
graph to make a circular orbit on 1 plane.
Can"t have a stationary single ball make 2 divots in 2 points of space at the
same time. Nonsense!

At least grow a pair and have 2 balls for your 2D diagram cross section.
What"s the cross section of a torus look like?


At least have 2 stationary balls for the 2D diagram. Or accurately show a
dynamic orbit motion of at least 1 ball (cylinder) orbiting around the cone
(frustum) of the circumcised sombrero. (that means you need fermions/
“electrons” to spin around in a ring at high frequencies)

Funny CERN"s own facility is an open Ring yet they can"t recognize a
cross section of their own model…. and conclude a closed well.
Must be all that “dark matter” in the center of the 17 mile facility. Or their
skulls for that matter. Lol

Here's a small list of costs for CERN..... JUST FOR THE YEAR 2008....
$21.5 Million for Extra Computing demands
$146.5 Million for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Operations
$79.2 Million for the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator
$158 Million for Tevatron Operations at Fermilab for Collider and other
neutrino physics programs
$62 Million for US CERN Scientists
Single year 2008 Expenditure TOTAL from the US Dept of Energy in its
ongoing investment in CERN & related activity = $467 Million Dollars
Numbers drawn from page 69 of CERNs 2008 budget form.


..... meanwhile.... Professor John Searl's claims require 3 million dollars, 18
months full time work and a team of less than a dozen personnel.
If my taxes go to pay for Cern's crap... is there a way I can opt out please?
Just put that money toward Professor John Searl instead please.

Occam's Razor... It'll cut the cost.













That 1 diagram is from page 115 from just ONE of Searl's books. Here's a
picture of 25 of his books. The other 60 or so were on the shelves. Couldn't
fit them on the table... or the others in boxes...



Higgs Field? More like THE SEARL EFFECT


Watch some leading University or CERN itself publish a new diagram soon
showing a "dynamic higgs field" with a swirling grid up the cone instead of
a "static higgs field" like in their current diagrams and understanding.
They'll probably try to attribute it to rotational frame-dragging and/or
Lense–Thirring Effect or a rotating Kerr "hill".
http://albert51.tripod.com/bhole.htm.

They would have to claim it's the result of a spinning massless particle.
Which is so laughable it's pathetic. At least call it negative mass.... or more
specifically, a rotation of an accumulation of "electrons". Condensed from
converging at the conical and tangential flux lines up the FRUSTUM.
(See why I"m so “frustrated!”)

If they make a new sombrero model with a twist and claim credit, just look
back on this note and diagram and push to get Searl the support he needs.
Invest a fraction of the funding into Professor John Searl so we can
actually have a unit to Display these effects. Not just get a new diagram
with a twist and a claim they discovered it to justify their last billion dollar
budget.

LOTS more to discuss and share and show in context. Lots.





This next image is the one that
did it for me finally.
The Poincare Conjecture





Apples fall on your head. But Halos surround your head.
Same mass equivalent can be present in the form of negative energy
(gravitational mass), but will manifest in the form of a ring. Not a dense ball
like positive mass. (Inertial mass)
http://www.dirac-was-right.com/negative-energy.php

Things to think about that will screw up your day.
Positive Mass with a Positive Charge (Proton)/ Positive Inertia
Positive Mass with a Negative Charge (Anti-Proton)/ Negative Inertia
Negative Mass with a Positive Charge (Positron)/ Positive Gravity
Negative Mass with a Negative Charge (Electron)/ Negative Gravity
Positive Mass compact to spheres. Negative Mass condense into a torus.
"Electrons" Have a negative charge. But are they really positive mass?
You can change the sign of mass, but it won't change the charge.

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-magic-quantum-revealed-cold-
atoms.html


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm


The same math for a positive mass with a negative charge is
transitory to a negative mass with a positive charge.

Thought of something with the orbital electron theory to explain it in
terms of this comparison photo.

Mass equivalence from multiple spheres to 1 torus.
If there are 2 alleged electrons orbiting in the inner shell, to me, that
means the negative mass equivalent of 2 electron balls but in the
form of 1 ring. So the mass of 2 ball electrons is there, but equally
distributed in a torus instead of 2 spheres. The torus becomes twice
as energy dense.

If there are 8 electrons in a shell... that means the negative mass
equivalent of 8 ball electrons is evenly distributed in a ring. More
energy dense, but still 1 ring.
1 ring per "shell".

As for the double slit experiment. That would be a 90 degree version
of what you see in the Walter Russell image.
Russell's image is showing an aeriel view. Parallel to the meniscus of
water compared to the double slit experiment which is perpendicular
to the meniscus.




But if you were to see it head on, it would look like ripples in a pond.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm

That's why it's so confusing for people.
Because they ASSUME they are shooting ball particles, when really
they are sending expanding rings which look like waves from head
on. Because electrons have mass (negative). But mainstream says
all mass is positive. So they assume a ball particle and see a wave,
then make up a fantasy about how the ball becomes a wave as soon
as you look.

So you're not shooting 1 electron from a gun in the form of a ball.
You're shooting an electron at a specific energy density at which will
form ripples regardless. But the amplitude of the ripple will change
depending on how energy dense.

In the Poincare Conjecture, it's ASSUMED the ring shrinks down to a
"point." NOPE
A ring cannot become a point.
But at the Planck scale... when it WOULD become a point... you get a
"gravitational collapse" because the energy is converging at the
center of an iris. Has no where to go, then MUST do something else.
(phase transition)

Negative mass CANNOT form a sphere or point.
So it collapses like a cavitation bubble to form another ring.

But like how an "electron" jumps to a higher or lower energy state and
"jumps electron shells".
What happens is that the large ring become a more energy dense
smaller ring. Folds in on itself after reaching a critical compression
(condensation)
Or the inverse is a smaller ring expands to become a less energy
dense larger ring.


I need help to make my a version of the periodic chart showing
"electron orbitals" as concentric circles of varying thickness. (almost
like layers of saturn"s rings)
More electrons per shell = a thicker more energy dense torus per
concentric ring. Instead of using multiple balls per shell on an
imaginary ring of equal thickness per shell... you have to use the
same mass equivalent but distributed in actual torus.

I think this helps explain the 1/2 spin BS in quantum theory.
You can't have a solid ball with 1/2 spin.
Doesn't work. a ball can spin 1 way OR the other.
But a torus can fold in on itself like a smoke ring. On 1 side of the
torus will be folding in CW "1/2 of the spin" and the other side will be
folding in CCW. The other half?
A ball cannot have # spin. Absurd.


There are six shells for neodymium. Six concentric rings of varying
energy density. 2, 8, 18, 22, 8, 2

Not that there is actually 2 balls orbiting the nucleus in the inner shell,
8 balls orbiting in the second shell, 18 balls orbiting in the third shell,
22 balls orbiting in the fourth Shell, 8 balls orbiting in the fifth Shell, 2
balls orbiting in the valence sixth shell.

To me, it's more like the inner shell has the negative energy density
equivalent to two ball electrons but evenly distributed in one ring.

The 2
nd
shell has a negative energy density equivalent to eight ball
electrons but evenly distributed in 1 ring.

The 3
rd
shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 18 ball
electrons but evenly distributed in one ring.

The 4
th
shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 22 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.

The 5
th
shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 8 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.

The 6
th
shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 2 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.

Not that ball electrons randomly pop into existence where ever you
happen to look. Lol

Still have to show Dan Winter's donut with the colored spiral.
Which is actually representative of what mainstream would call
"frame dragging". Which is a lag in a rotating magnetic field.
Which causes an inverse centripetal spin of negative mass UP and
AROUND the outside of a frustum cone that forms in the center of the
donut like an iris. (Not down the inside of a cone like ball particles in a
water vortex)

Then the energy converges and condenses around the ever
decreasing radii of the iris field which then collapses like a cavitation
bubble through the donut to form a toroid shape itself again. But
because of the tangential field lines converging, the collapse
manifests as a swirling donut. (dynamic)
Like a "Kerr Black Hole" (which is NOT a well resulting from a positive
mass sphere) More like the iris of a camera.

You cannot shrink a sphere of positive mass to make a ring.
Nor can you cannot form a sphere out of a negative mass ring.
They are 2 different shapes and states.
Einstein called that the equivalence principle which is why he thought
gravity and inertia were the same.
That's like saying a sphere and a ring are the same. FAIL!

Relativity is for linear moving Spheres and positive mass.
Absolutivity is for non-linear spinning Rings and negative mass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_time_and_space





Pink Line on the square grid in the upper left corner represents E Field.
Red Line in that grid Represents B field.
You can transpose a Square grid into a torus where we see the correct
orientation of electric to magnetic. The 3rd Vector is rotation.

The Pink Line and Red Line are 90 degrees to each other. Just as
magnetic and electric forces act on each other.
How to get them to interact?
What is half of 90 degrees? 45 degrees.
So you take the 45 degree angle of the square grid and when you
transpose it onto a torus, you get a swirl or wave if you trace the path.
Which means a dynamic motion of both electric and magnetic forces.
Moving in the SAME direction, which accelerates the system.
The numbers correlate with weights/ densities needed to make the unit.
Cannot deviate from certain numbers or the unit won't function. Like how a
tuning fork won't hit a desired pitch unless it's precise.


Since it's a torus, it's representative of negative mass. Which normally
behaves the opposite of positive mass. (spheres)
The negative mass (electrons/ ring) move in epicycles in the SAME
direction as the positive mass (orbiting rollers) in the SEG.

The coherent grid in green shows randomness converted to order. Like the
incoherence of energy all around us in ambient energy form.
But in this system, it's in a controlled imbalanced state. Which means the
energy is conserved, represented by the 34 at a constant. Regardless
which way you add the numbers, always the same. Regardless which way
you move the energy, it's always one. Always a Bose-Einstein condensate.
As opposed to the other state which is resistive and subject to Fermi-Dirac.
The waveform as imprinted on the rollers and stator interact to form
another wave which acts as a gear and impels the rollers around the
stator. As a cascading energy conversion takes place.
Making random into order. Dropping the temperature and generating an
electric current as an open system.

Apparently, random electricity is heat and inertia while organized electricity
is cold and gravity.

Understanding the SEG - Reality of Costs/ "Blueprints" - Mock Up vs
Prototype - Coherence vs Chaos - History of John Searl - Current Status of
Project & Context:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/217826903/Understanding-John-Searl-s-SEG

FAQs:
http://searlsolution.com/contact2.html

Searl Playlist:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL648B9EAD08EF537F

Searl Sites:
http://www.SearlMagnetics.com/
http://www.SearlSolution.com/members/technology5.html
http://www.SwallowCommand.com/index-4.html
http://www.SearlAerospace.com/

3rd Party sites:
http://www.SearlEffect.com/free/allaccess/allaccess.html
http://www.JohnSearlStory.com/
Pdf of Lecture on John Searl:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/134608782/John-Searl-and-the-SEG-
Presentation

Professor John Searl Album (Facebook):
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.409237198301.184888.68358
3301&type=3

Professor John Searl Photobucket Album:
http://s108.photobucket.com/user/Therealverbz/library/John%20Searl

There are many people trying to COPY Professor John Searl"s work.
If PhD holding professionals are spending millions of dollars to investigate
Searl"s claims…. With success achieving anomalous results… Then
there"s obviously justification for funding THE ACTUAL INVENTOR
HIMSELF WHO IS STILL ALIVE AND LIVING IN SAN DIEGO, CA.

So many people would love to talk to Nikola Tesla or would get him full
funding if he were alive today. Well John Searl is here and NOW. And
others are spending lots of time, money and effort to reap just a fraction of
what the Searl Effect Generator is capable of.

Paul Murad & Morningstar Energy Box Audio Interview:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searl-effect-
generator.html

Murad Technical Data (which cost about $500,000):
http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/documents/Paul-Murad-SEG-
Replication.pdf


Russian Validations (which cost a couple million dollars)
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm

Picture of Russian Prototype:



Short video of Russian Prototype with translation:
"Russian physicist/ scientist Sergei Godin & Vladimier Roschin have
observed that when the rotor turned clockwise it's weight reduced, and
when spun the other way it gained weight. Such effects can only be
obtained when a device affects the gravitation and inertia of the body.
Experiments continue."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1_xtwsr3Go

Dr. Tom Valone Speaks on Electrogravitics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unMr8l1j2Do

Welton Meyers Account:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Welton_Myers#Searl_Effect_Gener
ator

Arthur Manelas' Magnets:
"The first technology that Arthur demonstrated on my visit was a magnet
that had been poled in a specific way. When you observed the magnetic
field rather than the usual long sweeping waves between north and south,
this had small micro domains. It looked like for a lack of a better
explanation Egyptian hieroglyphics." -- Mark Dansie
http://revolution-green.com/memory-arthur-manelas

Dr. Paul Brown Attempted Magnetization 1986:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/127455220/SEG-Experiment-by-Dr-Paul-
Brown-1986

SEG Background:
http://www.rexresearch.com/searl4/searl4.htm

Design:
http://www.rexresearch.com/searl/searl.htm

Ultra Efficient LED (for context)
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds






Podkletnov:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005

Dr. Podkletnov describes his “force beam generator” experiment and his
improvements to increase the experimental gravity-beam. The force beam
is generated by passing a high-voltage discharge from a Marx-generator
through a YBCO emitter suspended in a magnetic field. He described it as
being powerful enough to knock over objects in the lab as well as capable
to punch holes in solid materials. After careful testing, Podkletnov found
the speed of the impulse to be approx. 64 times the speed of light (64c),
which he indicates doesn't conflict with interpretations of Relativity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html

"Podkletnov claims the gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5
megavolt drop onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed in
a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around the apparatus."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-on-
gravity-shielding.html

"The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been
measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all
materials without a decrease in force."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-on-
antigravity.html

"Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column
above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above
the disc. We found that any object above the disc lost some weight, and
we found that if we rotated the disc, the effect increased."
















Boeing and Podkletnov:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm













NASA and Podkletnov (Look into Dr. Ning Li)



Propagation of Gravity based on Lorentz 1 min. 50 second audio:
http://wri27.com/mp3/gravity.mp3

Gravity as 2nd Order Function
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505194

Dr. Eugene Podkletnov Interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyAFElQZcU




Please Watch this for Context:















Where else can we find these little Higgs Field shapes in nature?

More of Nature’s Coherent Order:




A microscopic image of the underside of the Elytra (wing casing)


Compare the natural array on the underside of a scarab’s Elytra
to a man-made nanostructure on a “revolutionary solar panel”
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/06/new-nanocone-solar-
panels-will-revolutionize-the-energy-industry-2242003.html




Underside of Elytra of Scarab Beetle - Hydrophilus Triangularus:




http://www.dailytech.com/Scientists+Solve+Greatest+Superconductor
+Puzzle+Yet/article12800.htm


'The property is exhibited primarily by cuprates, brittle ceramic
materials composed of two-dimensional sheets of copper and oxygen
separated by more complicated layers of atoms. When cuprates are
cooled below a certain temperature, electrons in the copper-oxygen
sheets suddenly overcome their mutual repulsion and pair up. With
their powers combined, they behave like a different type of particle
altogether, a boson, which has the unique ability to join with other
bosons into a coherent swarm that moves as one. This bosonic
swarm perfectly conducts electricity. A current flowing through a loop
of cuprate wire will persist forever — or as long as the liquid-nitrogen
fridge stays on.'

http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140430-decoding-the-
secrets-of-superconductivity


Again, look at all that expensive equipment needed for this kind of
research. If that particular team working on researching
they would be able to explore what they are currently exploring?

Electrons Not the Cause of Charged Grains:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/58







Electrons are Not Enough: Cuprates Defy Convention
http://phys.org/news/2013-03-electrons-cuprate-superconductors-
defy-convention.html



Science that Stumped Einy:
http://phys.org/news/2014-07-science-stumped-einstein.html#jCp







A Counterintuitive Phenomenon:
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-counterintuitive-phenomenon-
coexistence-superconductivity-dissipation.html






















Law of Squares – The Basics



Professor John Searl understands patterns.
He sees a seemingly chaotic state (Brownian Motion) and is able to
see how it can be transformed into an ordered state and/or
coherent flow (laser-like focus).
This has to do with everything from transduction, to DNA, to
calculating densities, to calculating electric outputs and a lot more.
John Searl has written about 100 Books on this subject in sets.
Volumes of material.
http://www.searleffect.com/free/store/store.html
In the picture above are only 25 books. There were about 40 more
on the shelves that I couldn't fit on the table. And there are more still
in boxes.
"All that the Law of the Squares does is to give you a route in which,
if you've got your sum right, gives you the option to achieve your
objective. Whether you're designing a building or what ever it is... it
gives you a route to follow. Which 99.9% of the time will be perfect.
No adjustments needed." -- John Searl
I kept wondering how the HELL John could fill in the squares so
quickly. I gave him 1 number in 1 box, and in 30 seconds, he would
fill in the rest. All the numbers will add to the same sum no matter
which way you add. There was obviously a pattern that I couldn't
see.
"Because the squares have structure, it's got DNA. That means
every square has a mathematical value to connect to the next one.
And so on. As long as you know the DNA, then it's child's play." --
John Searl

The Law of Squares is a numbered matrix. Like Sudoku. It's also
called "Magic Squares". Many people throughout history have
understood the same laws and patterns.
One man most known for the squares was named Lo Shu.
In this note, I'm only going to show the basic patterns I've learned,
and the relationships between the numbers. We have years of
research to do in order to find how all this relates to Walter Russell's
"Cubic Wave Field", Marko Rodin's "Vortex Based Math", Eric
Dollard's work regarding "counter-space", the function of DNA, and
a lot more.

At age 6, John Searl started having reoccurring dreams of Squares
and Hop Scotch.




When John Searl was working for the electric company as a 14 year
old, he saw a piece of paper with a little 2 next to a big 2.


He asked the foreman what it meant and the man answered it was
"2 squared".
John asked, "What is 2 squared?"
The man said, "You know, 2 squares on top of 2 squares. Equals 4
squares. 2^2 = 4. 2 x 2. Two by Two"



John asked, "But what is the value of the squares?" (meaning what
do the blank spots represent?)



The man said, "They don't represent anything, it's just a formula we
use to get the answer. Count the number of squares and you get
the answer."

John Searl knew something was missing. How can you have empty
squares? They have to have Some value in reality. He thought back
to his 6 years of reoccurring dreams and started coming up with
volumes of material to explain what the Value is of the squares
represents and more. He would develop his own unique way of
using an ancient concept of "Magic Squares" as a calculator.
This has huge implications.

John was looking at it literally.
2^2 = 4.
"Four what?" - J.S.
"Four Squares." -Boss
But you can't just have "a square" in reality. Those 4 squares are the
face of a cube.

"What is the value?" - J.S.
"Value" is the unit of measurement you assign. Whether it be grams
per cubic centimeter (g/cm^3), or grams per cubic meter (g/m^3),
or pounds per cubic meter (lbs/m^3), pounds per cubic foot
(lbs/ft^3), tons per cubic foot (ton/ft^3), etc etc etc.,
So, "Four what?" - J.S.
"Four Squares." - Boss
But in reality those squares represent 1 side of a cube.
Cube of what? What is the weight and volume of the cubes? Both
individually and as a whole.
Keep asking, "What is the value?" until you assign the desired units
and actually describe something in reality.
Even though each number represent blocks within a larger cube
(small composites in a total volume), we are only paying attention to
1 side of the cube. 1 face.

Just make sure you stick with any 1 given side and stick with the
same units when assigning each square a number. Those numbers
represent units whether grams, pounds, etc. Because it's part of a
cube, you know to assign a cubic measurement whether it be cm,
meters, inches, feet, miles, light years, etc. Thus, the /__^3. Fill the
space by assigning a unit.
The squares already tell you the equations in the right format. Just
need to assign what you're calculating by using Real examples.

So, let's assign some numbers.
We'll get to adding the sums up in a bit.
First we'll understand more about the mass and volume (space)
part.


Let's pick the diagonal numbers, 3, 5 and 7.
Assign them a value (unit)
Let's use grams.
3g, 5g and 7g.
But you can't just have "weight" in reality. With weight comes
volume. If an object "weighs" something, it will have volume and
take up space. (Weight is only measured relative to 2 or more
bodies. All objects are inherently "weightless" unto themselves)


Look at this image again, but in a literal sense:


The numbers are over a cube. What does that mean mathematically
if you were to write it out?
3/__^3, or 5/__^3, or 7/__^3
But you can't just have an exponent (the cube) by itself in reality.
"What is the value?"
What unit of measurement are you going to assign for the __? cm,
meters? feet?
And remember the numbers over the cube represent quantities in
reality. Assign the unit:
3 grams/cm^3, or 5 grams/cm^3, or 7 grams/cm^3.

And again, "What is the value?" 3 grams, 5 grams and 7 grams of
What?
Depends on what you're measuring. Assign a material to it or
compound or alloy.
Let's say copper.
3 grams of copper/cm^3. What does that mean in reality?
That means there is 3 grams of copper per every cubic centimeter
of space.
That right there tells you the equation to find the density.
D = m/v. Density equals mass divided by volume. Mass is the
weight. Volume is the amount of space or length x width x height.
If you know the weight of copper per a given amount of space (1
cubic centimeter)... what is 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter x 1
centimeter? 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.
So the volume is 1 in this case. The mass is the weight which is 3
grams.
m/v = D
3 divided by 1 = 3.
So the Law of Squares tells you how to calculate the density as well
as gives you the equations by translating the position of numbers in
a literal sense. And translating the ambiguous numbers on a 2D
square into a 3D reality using real materials You assign and knowing
their weights and volumes (by measuring).

All of that and more in John Searl's head as a child. In an
instantaneous avalanche of questions and logic. From seeing this:


O_o

Interesting phenomenon take place when coils are in resonance.
What phenomenon would take place from having the density of
mass in resonance between materials in a solid state system or
system of any kind?

How many electrical systems account for the DENSITY of materials
used in that system?

How many people account for Density when making a part?
Most only need outer dimensions. Ask how much more difficult 3D
printing would be if the printer had to account for density to make a
part. Add that to the CAD maker's program. He'll love that.

The SEG is made according to Density. Everything is built around
that.
The output of the SEG is dictated by its density.

The Law of squares is a calculator. For a lot of things.
Let's use it for digits
Start simple at first with a 3 by 3 square:


The point is to add each row up horizontally, vertically and
diagonally.
When all the numbers are in regular order, you get different sums:

How can you arrange the numbers so that they all add to the same
sum no matter which way you calculate?






TAKE NOTE OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE 9 NUMBERS. THIS
TELLS YOU HOW TO SOLVE ANY 3 BY 3 SQUARE!
Let's try bumping it up by one digit.
Instead of 1 through 9, let's use 2 through 10.





((I'm keeping the 1 - 9 in the square so you know how to place ANY
consecutive numbers in the squares))








Now let's add up add the large digits:


Notice how they all add up to 18 now.
If we use 3 through 11, we follow the same rules. But the sum will
equal 21.
If we use 4 through 12, we follow the same rules. But the sum will
equal 24.
If we use 5 through 13, we follow the same rules. But the sum will
equal 27.
We're on a 3 by 3 square. And every time you bump up the
sequence by 1 digit, the sum will increase by 3.



Now let's move to a 4 by 4 square.
The rules are the same no matter what the matrix/ grid/ square.
You just need to know the initial order. Then that will give you the
route to take for ANY consecutive numbers.



TAKE NOTE OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE 16 NUMBERS. THIS
TELLS YOU HOW TO SOLVE ANY 4 BY 4 SQUARE.



Now let's try starting with the number 17 in Square 1 and follow the
rules:



Add up each row and you'll get 98.
Now start with the number 18 in Square 1 and follow the rules:



Add up each row and you'll get 102

Now start with number 19 in Square 1 and follow the rules:



Add up each row and you'll get 106.

When you bump up the digit by one in a 4 by 4... the sum will go up
by 4. Just like the sum goes up by 3 in a 3 by 3 square!
The same will go for a 5 by 5 to infinity.
So I drew a line from square 1 to square 2 to square 3, etc.
This is the image I got. Perfectly symmetrical!






And if you draw a line through each column that adds up.. you get
this image:


Here are a few examples from John Searl:






The relationship between the purple sets are 5, 7 and 15.
Top purple example skips every 5th number starting with 3.
3, 8, 13, 18, 23, etc

3 goes in square 1.
8 goes in square 2.
13 goes in square 3.
18 goes in square 4.
etc.

Second example skips every 7th number starting with 7.
7, 14, 21, 28, 35, etc.

7 goes in square 1.
14 goes in square 2.
21 goes in square 3.
28 goes in square 4.
etc.

Third example skips every 15th number starting with 13.
13, 28, 43, 58, 73, etc.

13 goes in square 1.
28 goes in square 2.
43 goes in square 3.
58 goes in square 4.
73 goes in square 5.
Etc




Here are some switching methods to get from the regular order that
doesn't add up, to the "random" order that adds up to the same
sum.





































Magic Square Physics
BY IVARS PETERSON 3:57PM, JUNE 30, 2006

The study of magic squares has a long, long history. In ancient
Babylonian times, these array of numbers were held to have magical
powers. Over the years, they have also served as protective charms
and religious symbols.

At the recreational level, they're fun for all ages, says Peter Loly of
the University of Manitoba.

Loly himself has investigated the "physical" properties of magic
squares—treating the numbers of each such square as physical
quantities.

A magic square is a square matrix drawn as a grid filled with
numbers. It consists of a set of integers arranged in the form of square
so that the numbers in each row, column, and diagonal all add up to
the same total. If the integers are consecutive numbers from 1 to n2,
the square is said to be of nth order. The magic sum itself is given by
n(n2 + 1)/2.

Suppose, for example, you interpret the numbers as masses. You can
then determine a magic square's moment of inertia about a given axis
of rotation. For any specific case, you obtain the moment of inertia,
In, of a magic square of order n about an axis at right angles to its
center by summing mr2 for each cell, where m is the number
centered in a cell and r is the distance of the center of that cell from
the center of the square measured in units of the nearest neighbor
distance.

You find that the moment of inertia, Iz, about the square's center (an
axis at right angles to the square) is twice the moment of inertia
about an axis of rotation along the center row or column.
In general, you can show that, for order
n, Iz = [n2 + (n4 – 1)]/12.
So, for n = 3, Iz = 60; for n = 4, Iz = 340.

"This is the only property of magic squares, aside from the line sums,
which is solely dependent on the order of the square, n," Loly and
Adam Rogers note in a paper published in 2004 in the Canadian
Undergraduate Physics Journal.

The same formula applies to semi-magic squares, which don't meet
the standard requirement that diagonals also sum to the magic
number.

Such an analysis can be extended to magic cubes. A magic cube
consists of n3 numbers, arranged so that each row, column, and main
diagonal give the same sum. In the case, the magic constant is
n(n3 + 1)/2.

Here's one example.

2 13 27 1 6 21 5 24 8 10
22 9 11 3 14 25 17 19 6
18 20 4 23 7 12 1 15 26

The three layers (above) of a 3-by-3 magic cube.

Loly and Rogers show that the moment of inertia of a magic cube is
n3(n3 + 1)(n2 – 1)/12. In effect, they demonstrate that magic cubes
have the same inertial form as a spherical top.

It's also possible to consider the numbers of magic squares to be
electric charges and to extend such analyses to higher dimensions.
Loly has even calculated the so-called Eigen values of magic
squares, which are related to their "fundamental frequencies" if you
were to set these squares ringing like a bell.

"When treated as mass distributions, magic squares give clear and
accessible examples of the properties of the moment of inertia," Loly
says. "When treated as matrices, magic squares also serve as
exceptional examples of some advanced linear algebra theorems."
Check out Ivars Peterson's MathTrek blog at
http://blog.sciencenews.org/.


Some other seemingly related diagrams from Walter Russell (1926)





























































Abstract ~
In the present paper the results of the experimental research of
Magnetic-Gravity Effects are presented. The abnormal magnetic and
thermal changes in the radius of 15 meters from the researched
device were measured as well. PACS: 41.20.-q; 44.60.+k; 76.50.+q
Introduction ~
There has been a great interest in examining nonlinear effects in the
system of rotating magnetic fields. Such effects have been observed
in the device called Searl's generator or SEG (SEG, Searl Effect
Generator) [1-4]. An SEG consists of a series of three rings and
rollers that go around those rings. All parts of SEG are based on the
Law of the Squares. The rollers revolve around the plates that form
the rings, but they do not touch them. There's a primary north and
south pole on the rollers and a primary north and south pole on the
plates. Obviously you will have the north pole of the roller attracted to
the south pole of the plate. The plate and the rollers have layered
structure. The external layer - Titan, then Iron, Nylon and last internal
layer was made from Neodymium. John R.R. Searl has supposed
that the electrons are given off from the central element (which is
neodymium), and they travel out through other elements. If nylon had
not been put there, the SEG would act like a laser and one pulse
would go out and it would stop, build up, and another pulse would go
out. But, with the nylon being, nylon acts as a control gate, and that
control gate gives you an even flow of electrons throughout the SEG
[4]. In [4] it was shown that in the process of magnetization of the
plate and rollers, the combination of constant and variable magnetic
fields for creating a special wave (sine wave) pattern on a plate
surface and rollers surface was used. The basic effects are the rollers
self-running around a ring plate and reduction of weight up to
occurrence of propulsion and flying up of all magnetic system. These
effects come about because of a special geometry of experimental
setup. It was shown that the work of the device in critical regime is
accompanied by biological and real physical phenomena.
Unfortunately except for the listed references we could not find other
information where similar effects are be mentioned. In this paper we
present the experimental device the results we have obtained.
The Description of the Experimental Installation ~
The basic difficulty is in a choosing the materials and maintaining the
necessary pattern imprinting on the plate and rollers surfaces. To
simplify the technology we decided to use a one-ring design with one-
ring plate (stator) and one-ring of rollers (rotor). It is obvious, that it
was necessary to strengthen the rollers on a rotor by the bearings
and balance the rollers well. In the suggested design the air bearings
were used which provided the minimum losses due to friction. From
the available description [1-4] it was not clear how it is possible to
make and magnetize the stator with a diameter of about one meter. In
order to make the stator from separate magnetized segments
executed on the basis of rare earth magnets with the residual
induction 1T; the segments were magnetized in a usual way by
discharging capacitor battery through the coil. Afterwards the
segments were assembled and glued together in a special iron
armature, which reduced magnetic energy. To manufacture the stator
110 KGs of rare earth magnets were used, and to manufacture the
rotor 115 KGs of that material was used. High-frequency field under
magnetization was not applied. It was decided to replace an
imprinting technology described in [1-4] with cross-magnetic inserts
having a flux vector directed at 90 degrees to a vector of basic
magnetization of a stator and rollers of a rotor. For these cross inserts
the modified rare earth magnets with a residual magnetization of 1,2
T and coercive force a little bit greater than in a base material was
used. In Figure 1 and Figure 2 the joint arrangement of stator 1,
elements of a rotor - rollers 2 and a way of their mutual gearing by
means of cross magnetic inserts 19, are shown. Between the stator
and roller surfaces the air gap d of 1 mm is left.
No layered structure was used except a continuous copper foil of 0.8
mm thickness which wrapped up the stator and rollers. This foil has
the direct electrical contact to magnets of a stator and rollers.
Distance between inserts in the rollers is equal to distance between
inserts on the stator.
Figure 1: Variant of One-Ring Converter ~
The ratio of parameters of the stator 1 and the rotor 2 in Figure 2 is
chosen so that the relation of stator diameter D and roller diameter d
is an integer equal to or greater then 12. Choosing such a ratio allows
us to achieve a magnetic spin wave resonant mode between
elements of a working body of the device.



Figure 2: Organization of Magnetic Gearing Stator & Rollers ~
The elements of magnetic system were assembled in a uniform
design on the aluminum platform. In Figure 3 the general view of the
platform with one-ring converter is displayed. This platform was
supplied with springs, amortizators and had a possibility of moving
vertical on three supports. The value of displacement was measured
by the induction meter of displacement 14; thus the change of the
platform weight at once has been defined during the experiment in
real time. Gross weight of the platform with magnetic system in the
initial condition was 350 KGs.



Figure 3: General View of the Platform with One-Ring Converter
~

The stator 1 was mounted motionlessly, and the rollers 2 were
assembled on a mobile common separator 3, connected with the
basic shaft 4 of the device. Through this shaft the rotary moment was
transferred. The basic shaft by the means of friction muff 5 was
connected to the electrodynamics generator 7 and starting engine 6,
which accelerated the converter up to a mode of self-sustained
rotation. Along a rotor the electromagnetic inductors 8 with open
cores 9 were located. The magnetic rollers 2 crossed the open cores
of inductors and closed the magnetic flux through electromagnetic
inductors 8, and induced emf in them, which acted directly on an
active load 10 (a set of incandescent lamps with total power 1 kW).
The electromagnetic inductors 8 were equipped with an electrical
drive 11 and had an opportunity to smoothly move on supports 12. To
study the influence of the external high voltage on the characteristics
of the converter the system of radial electrical polarization was
mounted. On periphery of the rotor ring electrodes 13 were set
between the electromagnetic inductors 8 having with the rollers 2 air
gap of 10 mm.
The electrodes are connected to a high-voltage source; the positive
potential was connected to the stator, and the negative to the
polarization electrodes. The voltage was adjusted in a range of 0-20
kV. In experiments the constant value of 20 kV was used. In case of
emergency braking, friction disk from the ordinary car braking system
was mounted on a basic shaft of the rotor. The electrodynamics
generator 7 was connected to active load through a set of switches
ensuring step connection of the load from 1 kW to 10 kW. The
converter under going testing had in its inner structure the oil friction
generator of thermal energy 15, intended for taping a superfluous
power (more than 10 kW) into the thermo-exchange contour. But
since the real output power of the converter in experiment has not
exceeded 7 kW, the oil friction thermal generator was not used. The
complete stabilization of revolutions of the rotor was carried out by
electromagnetic inductors connected to an additional load, which was
set of incandescent lamps with total power 1 kW.


Experimental Results ~
The magnetic-gravity converter was built in a laboratory room on
three concrete supports at a ground level. The ceiling height the lab
room was 3 meters. Besides the presence of the iron-concrete
ceiling, in immediate proximity from the magnetic system there was a
generator and electric motor, which contained some tens KGs of iron
and could potentially deform the field's pattern. The device was
started by the electric motor, which accelerated the rotation of the
rotor. The revolutions were smoothly increased up to the moment the
ammeter included in a circuit of the electric motor started to show
zero or lower value of a consumed current or even a presence of the
back current. The presence of the back current is detected at approx.
550 rpm. The magnetic moving sensor 14 starts to detect the change
in weight of the whole installation at 200 rpm. Afterwards the electric
motor is completely disconnected by the electromagnetic muff and
the ordinary electrodynamics generator is connected to the basic
shaft of the device through the same muff. The rotor of the converter
continues to self-accelerate and with the approach to the critical
mode of 550 rpm, the weight of the device quickly changes. In
addition to the change speed of rotation the weight depend of the
power, removed into active load, (the set of ten ordinary electrical
water heaters of 1 kW was used) and of the applied polarizing
voltage, as well. At the maximum output power equal to 6-7 kW the
change of weight G of the whole platform (total weight is about 350
KGs), reaches 35 % of the weight in an initial condition G?. A load of
more than 7 kW results in a gradual decrease of revolutions and exit
from the mode of self-generation with the subsequent complete stop
of the rotor. The weight of a platform can be controlled by applying of
a high voltage to cellular ring electrodes located at a distance of 10
mm from external surfaces of the rollers. Under the high 20 kV
voltage (electrodes negative pole) the increase of taped power in
circuit of the basic generator more than 6 kW does not influence G
while the revolutions per min is not decreased to 400 rpm.
"Tightening" of this effect is observed as well as the effect of
hysteresis on G (a kind of "residual induction"). The experimental
diagrams given on Fig.4 illustrate the modes of the converter
operations.


Figure 4: Modes of Operation of the Magnet-Gravity Converter ~

The effect of a local change of the platform weight is convertible
relative to the direction of rotor turning, and has the same hysteresis.
At clockwise rotation the critical mode comes in the area of 550 rpm
and the propulsion force against the direction of gravitation vector is
created, by analogy, at counter-clockwise rotation the critical mode
comes the in area of 600 rpm and the propulsion on the direction of
gravitation vector is created. The difference in approach to a critical
mode of 50-60 rpm was observed. It is necessary to mention that the
most interesting region lies above the critical area of 550 rpm, but
due to of a number of circumstances the implementation of such
research was not possible. Other interesting effects include the work
of the converter in the dark room when corona discharges are
observed around the converter's rotor as a blue-pink glowing
luminescence and a characteristic ozone smell. The cloud of
ionization covers the area of a stator and a rotor and has accordingly
toroidal form. On the background of luminescence glowing on rollers'
surfaces we distinguished wave picture. A number of more vigorous
strips of discharges around the rollers were observed. These
discharges were of the white - yellow color is, but the characteristic
for the arc discharges sound was not audible. One more effect
previously not mentioned was observed i.e. the vertical magnetic
"walls" around the installation. We noticed and measured the
abnormal permanent magnetic field around the converter in the
radius of 15 meters. The zones of an increased intensity of a
magnetic flux 0,05T located concentrically from the centre of the
installation were detected. The direction of magnetic field vector in
these walls coincided with the direction of rollers' field vector. The
structure of these zones reminded circles on water from the thrown
stone. Between these zones a portable magnetometer, which used
the Hall's sensor as a sensitive element, did not register abnormal
magnetic fields. The layers of an increased intensity are distributed
practically without losses up to a distance of about 15 meters from
the centre of the converter and quickly decrease at the border of this
zone. The thickness of each layer is about 5 - 8 cm. The border of
each layer has sharp shape, the distance between layers is about 50
- 60 cm and it slightly accrues when moving from the centre of the
converter. The steady picture of this field was observed as well at a
height of 6 m above the installation (on the second floor above the
lab.). Above the second floor the measurements were not carried out.
The abnormal fall of the temperature in direct affinity from the
converter was also found. While the common temperature
background in laboratory was + 22? (2?) the fall of temperature equal
to 6-8? was noticed. The same phenomenon was observed in vertical
magnetic walls as well as. The measurements of temperature inside
the magnetic walls were carried out by the ordinary alcohol
thermometer with inertia of indication about 1,5 min. In the magnetic
walls the temperature changes can be distinctly observed even by
hand. The hand when placed into this magnetic wall feels real cold at
once. The similar picture was observed at the height above
installation, i.e. on the second floor of the laboratory as well as
despite the ferro-concrete blocking of ceiling.
Discussion ~
All the results we obtained are extremely unusual and require some
theoretical explanation. Unfortunately the interpretation of results
within the framework of the conventional physical theory cannot
explain all the observed phenomena and first of all the change of
weight. The change of weight is possible to interpret as a local
change of gravity force or as an occurrence of propulsion force by
repelling from its own field.
Direct experiment, confirming a presence of draft force was not
performed, but in any case both interpretations of the weight change
do not correspond to the modern physical paradigm and demand
reconsideration of the standard theory of gravitation or criticism of the
second law of Newton, both of which are only possible if we take into
consideration the now-advert physical media ether as understood by
Faraday-Maxwell-Mie. From the modern physics position
electrilization and luminescence of the converter's magnetic system
in the near zone is not completely clear. The phenomenon of the
magnetic and thermal "walls" may be connected with Alphen's
magnetic-sound waves raised in near zone in magnetized plasma
induced by a variable magnetic field of a rotating rotor [5].
At the present time we can not give an exact description of the
interactions mechanism with environment and transformation of
energy, but it is completely obvious, that without the use of the
concept of physical media --- the ether in a sense of Faraday-
Maxwell-Mie we are completely unable to give physically substantial
theory of these phenomena. In conclusion, we emphasize that the
issues of the biological influence effects and especially of the
variations of real time stream effects, which must be taking place in
an operative zone of the converter, were not considered at all. These
issues are extremely important and absolutely unexplored; though
there are some mentions of J.R.R.Searl about healing action of the
SEG's radiation. Our own experience allows to make only cautious
assumption that the short-term stay (dozen minutes) in a working
zone of the converter with the fixed output power of 6 kW remains for
the people without observed consequences. The present paper is
only a beginning.
References ~
1. Herbert Schneider, Dr. J.B. Koeppl, Hans-Joachim Ehlers:
"Begegnung mit John R.R. Searl"; Raum und Zeit, #39 (1989), pp.
75-80. 2. S. Gunnar Sandberg: "Was ist Dran am Searl-Effect; Raum
und Zeit, #40 (1989), pp. 67-75. 3. Herbert Schneider & Harry Watt:
"Dem Searl-Effect auf der Spur"; Raum und Zeit, # 42 (1989), pp.75-
81; #43, pp.73-77. 4. John A. Thomas, Jr.: "Anti-Gravity: The Dream
Made Reality"; Extraordinary Science, VI (2) 1994. 5. L.D.Landau,
E.M.Lifshits: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media; Moscow, Nauka,
1982. (in Russian)















Technical Physics Letters 26 (12): 1105-1107 (2000)
"An Experimental Investigation of the Physical Effects in a
Dynamic Magnetic System"
V.V. Roschin & S.M. Godin Inst. of High Temperatures, Russian
Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Abstract ~
It is demonstrated that a magnetic system based on rare-earth
magnets is capable of converting various forms of the energy,
provided that a certain critical operating regime is set up. As the
critical regime is attained, the experimental setup becomes
energetically fully autonomous. This is accompanied by local
variations in the total structure weight, a decrease in the surrounding
air temperature, and the formation of concentric "magnetic walls" at a
distance of up to 15 meters from the experimental setup.
Introduction ~
We have experimentally studied the physical effects in a system
based on rotating permanent magnets (1). Below we describe the
technology of manufacture, assembly, and the results of testing this
experimental setup, which is referred to as the converter.
Technological Description ~
The converter comprises an immobile stator and a rotor moving
around the stator and carrying fixed magnetic rollers. The magnetic
system of the working body of the converter has a diameter of about
1 meter. The stator and magnetic rollers were manufactured from
separate magnetized segments made of rare-earth magnets (REMs)
with a residual magnetization of 0.85 T, a coercive force of [Hc] ~ 600
kA/m, and a specific magnetic energy of [W] ~ 150 K/m3.
The segments were magnetized by a conventional method based on
a discharge of a capacitor bank through an inductor coil. Then the
magnetized segments were assembled and glued together in a
special mounting stage, which provided for the necessary tolerance in
positioning the segments and for the removal of magnetic energy.
Using this mounting stage, it was possible to glue the elements into
the common unit. The stable incorporated REMs with a total weight of
110 kg and the rollers contained 115 kg of the same REM material.
The magnetic system elements were assembled into a single
structure on a special platform made of non-magnetic structural
alloys. The platform construction was provided with springs and
shock absorbers and allowed the converter setup to move in the
vertical direction on three sides. The motion was monitored by an
inductive transducer. Which allowed changes ion the platform weight
to be determined in the course of the experiment. The total weight of
the platform with the magnetic system in the initial state was 350 kg.
Description of the Observed Effects ~
The converter was installed in a 2.5-meter high laboratory room using
three concrete supports on a ground level. In addition to the ordinary
steel-reinforced concrete ceiling blocks, the converter equipment
featured a usual electrodynamic generator and an electric motor, with
a total iron weight of several tens of kilograms (only these parts
could, in principle, introduce distortions into the electromagnetic field
pattern observed).
The converter was set to operate by over-speeding the rotor with the
aid of the electric motor. The motor speed was gradually increased
until the ammeter connected in the motor circuit showed zero
consumed current and the current direction reversal. This state
corresponded to a rotor speed of approximately 550 rpm, but the
motion transducer began to indicate a change in the platform weight
already at 200 rpm.
Then the electric motor was disconnected using an electromagnetic
overrunning clutch, and a usual electrodynamic generator was
connected instead to the main shaft of the converter via another
electromagnetic clutch. On attaining the critical regime (~550 rpm),
the rotor exhibited a sharp increase in the rotation speed; this was
accompanied by a slow-down in the rate of the current weight
reduction.


At this instant, the first 1 kW load was connected to the system.
Immediately upon this connection, the rotation speed began to
decrease, while the Delta G value kept increasing, and so on as
depicted in the figure.



A diagram illustrating various operation regimes of the
magnetogravitational converter showing (I) load power (kW) and
system weight variation; (II) 7-kW load (high voltage off); (III) 7-kW
load (high voltage on); (IV) supercritical regime; (V) subcritical regime
(1, high voltage off; 2, high voltage on).
The system weight variation depend both on the power consumed by
the active load (the load consisted of 10 ordinary 1-kW heating
elements) and on the polarization voltage applied. For a maximum
consumed power (7 kW), a change in the total platform weight
reached 35% of the initial value in the immobile state (350 kg), which
corresponded to 50% of the pure weight of the working body of the
converter. An increase in the load power above 7 kW led to a gradual
decrease in the rotor speed and, eventually, to the system going out
of the self-generation regime and the rotor speed decreasing until the
full stop. The platform weight could be controlled by applying a high-
voltage signal to the cellular ring electrodes situated 10 mm above
the external roller surface. Upon applying a 20 kV signal (negative
polarity on the electrodes), an increase in the load power
consumption above 6 kW did not affect the Delta G value even when
the rotor speed decreased down to 400 rpm. This was equivalent to
"prolongation" of the effect and was accompanied by phenomena of
the remnant induction" type with respect to Delta G. The converter
operation in various experimental regimes is illustrated in the figure.
The effect of the system weight variation is reversible with respect to
the direction of rotor motion and exhibits certain hysteresis. For the
clockwise rotation, the critical regime is observed in the region of 550
rpm and is accompanied by development of the force acting against
the gravity vector. For the counter-clockwise rotation, the onset of the
critical regime is observed at approximately 600 rpm and the extra
force coincides in direction with the gravity vector. The onset of the
critical regime exhibited a scatter within 50-60 rpm. It should be noted
that, probably, some other critical resonance regimes may exist,
which correspond to higher rotor speeds and markedly greater useful
load levels. Proceeding from the general theoretical consideration,
the output mechanical energy must nonlinearly depend on the
internal parameters of the converter magnetic system and the rotor
speed, so that the observed effects are likely to be far from optimum.
Establishing of the maximum output power maximum weight
variation, and the converter energy resource is of considerable
theoretical and practical interest.
Besides the phenomena described above, a number of other
interesting effects were observed in the system studied. In particular,
the converter operation in the dark is accompanied by a corona
discharge with a pink-blue light emission and by the production of
ozone. The ionization cloud is formed around the stator and rotor,
acquiring a toroidal shape. The general corona discharge background
is superimposed with a wavy pattern corresponding to the surface of
the rollers: the zones of increased emission intensity are distributed
along the roller height in a manner similar to that observed for the
high-voltage microwave induction energy storage in the pre-
breakdown state.
These zones appeared yellowish-white, but the emission was not
accompanied by sounds characteristic of the arc discharge. Nor did
we observe any visible erosive damage on the stator and rotor
surfaces.
One more effect, which was never reported previously, is the
appearance of vertical "magnetic walls" surrounding the setup. We
have detected and measured an anomalous constant magnetic field
around the converter. The measurements revealed zones of
increased magnetic strength on the order of 0.05 T arranged coaxially
relative to the system center. The direction of the magnetic field
vector on the "walls" coincides with that in the rollers. The structure of
these magnetic zones resembles the pattern of circular waves on the
water surface. No anomalous field is detected by a mobile
magnetometer, employing the Hall effect transducer, in the area
between zones. The layers of increased magnetic field strength are
propagating with virtually no attenuation to a distance of 15 meters
from the converter center and then rapidly decayed at the boundary
of this 15-meter area. Each layer zone is 5-8 cm thick and exhibits
sharp boundaries. The layers are spaced by 50-60 cm, the spacing
slightly increasing with the distance from the converter center. A
stable pattern was also observed at a height of 5 meters above the
setup (the measurements were conducted in a 2nd floor room above
the laboratory; no tests were conducted on a still higher level).
Another interesting phenomenon consists in an anomalous
temperature drop in the immediate vicinity of the converter. At a
general room temperature level in the laboratory (+22 +-2 C), the
temperature at the converter surface was 6-8 C lower. Similar
temperature variations were detected in the vertical magnetic "walls".
The temperature changes in the walls were detected by an ordinary
alcohol thermometer with a reading set time of 1.5 minutes. The
temperature variations in the magnetic "walls" can even be sensed by
the human body: a hand placed inside the "wall" immediately feels
cold. The same pattern was observed at a height of 5 meters above
the setup in a 2nd floor room above the laboratory (despite the steel-
reinforced concrete blocks separating the rooms).

Discussion of Results ~
All the experimental results described above are very unusual and
need some theoretical rationalization. Unfortunately, attempts at
interpreting the obtained results within the framework of the existing
physical theories showed that no one of these models can explain the
whole set of experimental data.
Recently, Dyatlov (2) attempted to combine the concepts of electricity
and gravity by introducing the so-called electronavigation and
magnetic-spin coefficients into the Heaviside gravity equations and
the Maxwell field equations. This provides for a relationship between
the gravitational and electrical components, as well as between the
magnetic and rotational components in a given medium. The
assumptions are built around a special model of inhomogenous
physical vacuum, called the vacuum domain model (2). It is
suggested that the extra relationships are absent outside the vacuum
domain. Although it is difficult to imagine a long-living vacuum
domain, the proposed model provides for a satisfactory explanation
(at least on a qualitative phenomenological level) for the appearance
of emission, the system weight variations, and the conversion of
energy taken from the surrounding medium into the rotational
mechanical moment of the rollers. Unfortunately, the theory cannot
provide a physical pattern of the observed phenomena.
Conclusion ~
At present, the work on a developed variant of the converter are in
progress at the Glushko "NPE Energomash" company (Moscow).
This setup would allow a deeper insight into the physics of observed
phenomena. Another aim is the creation of commercial samples for
various practical applications.
References ~
(1) Thomas, J.A.: Anti-Gravity: The Dream Made Reality ~ The Story
of John R.R. Searl; Direct International Science Consortium, London,
1994), Vol. 1, Issue 2. (2) Dyatlov, V.L.: Polarization Model
Heterogenous Physical Vacuum (Inst. Mat., Novosibirsk, 1998);
Translated by P. Pozdeev.
M. Pitkanen: About Strange Effects Related to
Rotating Magnetic Systems
An explanation of the Roschin-Godin experiment in terms of
Topological Geometro-Dynamics (TGD). [PDF]
Russian Patent # 2,155,435Mechanical Energy
Generating Device & Process
[ PDF ]
Publication date: 2000-08-27
Application Number: RU19990122275 19991027 ~ Priority
Number(s): RU19990122275 19991027
IPC Classification: H02N11/00; F03H5/00

Abstract ~
Power engineering and transport; miscellaneous industries.
UBSTANCE: Single-row power module has stator and rotor with
rollers combined by common separator. Stator and rotor are made of
permanent magnets or electromagnets based on composite
laminated magnetic, conducting, and insulating materials. Main shaft
of device is coupled via free-wheel clutches with starting motor that
brings device to automatic speed-maintaining mode of operation and
device loading system which is, essentially, electrodynamic generator
mechanically coupled with main shaft of device. Electromagnetic
transducers are radially arranged on device periphery. Propulsion
control is effected by adjusting mechanical energy taken off the
device and by producing radial electric polarization on its periphery by
means of annular electrodes separated from rotor rollers by air gap.
Electrodes are connected to high-voltage power supply. Generating
process includes electric power supply to starting gear, acceleration
of rotor shaft to working speed, take-off of generated energy, and
adjustment of mentioned energy and propulsion by varying rotor and
stator speed through varying load of generator connected to device
as well as by adjusting high voltage applied from external power
supply. EFFECT: Reduced energy consumption. 9 cl, 17 dwg.


New Energy Technologies, Vol. 10 (1), Jan.-Feb. 2003, p. 47
[ Excerpted from www.sisrc.com ]
Background
The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) technology, as applied to the
commercial market, had been previously developed to the point
where a few prototype SEG generators were made, and used for
electricity generation and motion. Commercial interest at that time
focused on the SEG’s transport potential and, under commercial
pressure to deliver a fully functional system, the original generators
were used and lost in a series of vehicular propulsion experiments
and demonstrations.
Funding was insufficient to continue with the manufacture of the
required larger-scale pressurized cabin machines --- resulting in the
termination of the project at that time.
Although all the operating principles, precise proportions and weights
of the required materials are known for three of the four required
operating materials, the precise data of the original magnetic layer is
uncertain. The objective of the current R&D program is to re-establish
the original magnetic layer using modern and more efficient materials.
Originally, the layered materials were constructed and magnetized by
the now-defunct Midlands Electricity board under the direction of
John Searl.
Modern magnetic materials have advanced considerably, and old
ones discontinued, so a series of tests need to be conducted to
establish the optimum materials and processes, These tests need to
comply with the working criteria required and must lead to a cost-
effective manufacturing process.
In recent times SISRC has been re-establishing the original research.
Due to the very limited funding that has been available, only a
partially functioning demonstration prototype of the SEG principles
has been possible. This prototype consists of the innermost of the
three composite tings required and several rollers…
Technical Description
Physically the Searl Effect Generator (SEG) consists of three
concentric rings each made of a composite of four different materials
which are also concentrically attached to each other. The three rings
are fixed to rotate around them, are rollers --- typically 10 on the first
ring, 25 on the next, and 35 on the outer ring. Surrounding the rollers
on the outer ring are coils which are connected in various
configurations to supply either AC or DC current at a variety of
voltages. Multiple magnetic poles are imprinted on the rings and
rollers to form frictionless magnetic bearings. These also arrange the
static charge into opposing charge clusters which cause the rollers to
rotate around the circumference of the ring (as shown in Figure 2)


Some expressions currently in use to describe the source of the
energy for the SEG are the Space Fabric, Quantum Energy Field of
Space, or Zero Point Energy. This is an unlimited and constant
source of energy which can be made to flow when the correctly
proportioned masses concerned are stimulated by the correct
frequencies creating an ‘open system’.
The idea of utilizing this source of energy is currently the subject to
various devices and experiments such as the ‘Lamb Shift’, ‘Casimir
Effect’, and the work of the Russian Nobel Prize winner Ilya
Prigogine. However, these devices and experiments tend only to
prove the existence of energy and not a method to create a coherent,
ordered flow to produce useful power.
In contrast, John Searl has discovered that, in order to create a
steady and stable flow, all the masses of the device (and the
stimulating frequencies) must conform to precise values determined
mathematically by the ‘Law of the Squares’. A machine constructed to
these principles produces a stable and useful power output.

Definition of a Surface-Operating SEG
A linear motor operating on a magnetic bearing with the
characteristics of an auto-transformer. The SEG is defined as a
device, which is constructed from 2,124 component parts, which
make up 3 plates and 66 roller sets. 12 of the 2,124 components
create the 3 plates, which act as reaction components. 2,112
components are employed to create 66 roller sets, which act as
active components. Each roller set consists of 8 segments
constructed from 32 components. Each segment cannot be less than
34 grams in weight, as the law of squares defines that value as the
lowest value suitable for the reasonable generation of electricity.
Therefore the smallest roller set must weigh 272 grams, making a
grand total of 2,244 grams per roller set for the smallest surface-
bound SEG.
Tolerance should be about 0.05 gram per roller set. The larger the
error the greater is the loss of power within the unit. Therefore the
total tolerance for the smallest SEG roller set must not be greater
than 3.30 grams --- above this factor the SEG will not function. For
the best results, the tolerance across the total 66 roller sets should
not exceed 0.05 grams!
The SEG is a step-up rotary transformer. In fact it’s a ‘three rotary
transformers’ operational system, within a unit. The inner transformer
output is fed in to the input of the second plate which increases the
output of the second unit, thereby increasing its final output to a very
high voltage. Therefore the SEG is just a prime mover for the
production of clean electrical energy. The output windings must be
designed to step down this output to 240 volts at 15 kW.
When the SEG rollers are brought into close proximity to the SEG
Ring, the Searl Effect resonant magnetic field causes negative ions
and electrons to be drawn into and accelerated through the machine.
This process is assisted by the highly electron-attracting rare earth
metal Neodymium.
The unique mechanical and material arrangement of the SEG pulses
the neodymium to continually release and replace the surplus
electrons to provide electrical or mechanical power, or both.



Development
Prior to the production of complete 15 KW SEGs, a minimum of two
demonstration Ring and Roller prototypes are to be produced.
The ‘Ring’ is typical of the innermost of the three rings required to
make a complete SEG. The 69-roller sets in a complete 3-ring SEG
are identical. Six roller sets will be made for the prototype inner rings
so that the Searl Effect can be demonstrated.
The production of a self-running Ring and Roller prototype will
establish the precise sequence and parameters of electrical,
magnetizing and material processes required for the SEG and will
demonstrate electrical power generation. An operating single inner
ring with 1-8 rollers will also determine if a particular material will
function correctly and at what level of power output…

Open Source Energy network http://www.opensourceenergy.org
Video Link:
http://www.opensourceenergy.org/_layouts/apps/vplayer2.asp?v
ID=24 ( IFNE Conference, Denver CO, 1994 )
www.searleffect.com
NOTES
"The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) is a magnetic diode, and what one
may consider one of the original "Free Energy" Devices. The inventor
of the technology is Professor John Robert Roy Searl of England.
The SEG in essence is a composite ring made of an electron
reservoir (a rare earth like Neodymium), a magnetized accelerator
stage (Iron or Nickel), an electron flow regulator stage (Nylon 66 or
Teflon), and finally, a paramagnetic layer (Aluminum or Copper). The
design of the SEG is both beautifully simple and infuriatingly complex
at the same time..."
"Inside each of these IGVs there is a powerful 3-ring SEG which
provides levity to the craft through a combination of magnetic,
electrostatic and flywheel effects, many of which I freely admit are
beyond my comprehension.
"The iron element in the SEG "plate" (the big ring) is magnetized with
a combined DC and AC magnetizing sequence which causes many
poles to form all over the surface of the iron, in a wave like pattern
corresponding to the AC frequency used. The iron element is then
combined with the others (which are NOT involved in the magnetizing
process) in a process called sintering - pushing them together under
pressure. The same is done for the smaller magnets, or "rollers",
except that each roller consists of eight stacked segments held
together by the magnetic field. When you have twelve roller stacks
and a correctly magnetized plate, and place the rollers on the plate as
below, something truly amazing happens.



"There are only ten rollers in the picture for safety reasons, as in a full
set, the rollers will accelerate to 250km/h around the plate! This
incredible feat is due to the instability of having an AC sine imprint on
the plate and a cosine print on the rollers - instability created as the
fields conflict causes the rollers to orbit the plate. They are held down
by the magnetic field and thrown out by the centrifugal forces, so the
rollers do not actually touch the plate when in motion. Thus, friction is
virtually non-existent, and the high electrostatic charge accumulated
by the SEG soon ionizes all the nearby air and pushes it totally away
from the SEG, enveloping it in an intense vacuum. High voltage
flashover thus becomes impossible, and the potentials created by the
generator can reach monstrous levels.


"Unlike any other form of electrical technology, the presence of
electron flow throughout the generator actually cools it, reducing the
resistance. This is due to free electrons being pulled out of the air and
the resulting energy deficit causing the air to cool. As one places a
greater and greater load on the SEG's induction coils (fitted so that
the rollers pass through them to produce high-frequency AC), the
rollers accelerate to accommodate the added energy drain, more
power is pulled from the air, and the temperature lowers even further.
A critical point is eventually reached. At 4 degrees Kelvin, the SEG
becomes superconductive and totally loses electrical resistance. At
this point, it levitates, completely enveloped in a perfect vacuum.
Without control, it will accelerate up away from the Earth and
disappear off into space, never to be seen again. To control it, a
powerful radio frequency emitted nearby is required. If the same RF
is transmitted as the AC frequency used to magnetize the rollers, they
will completely stop. This acts as an ideal control gate, preventing the
loss of costly generators.








——————————————————————————————







Take Note that there Indeed are volumes of scientific literature
corroborating John Searl’s claims and the dynamics of the SEG, open
systems, electronic and magnetic coherence, etc.
You just have to be prepared to take the time and search, READ,
compare, experiment and have on-going conversations.
I’ll probably include more articles that seemingly relate or validate the
science of the SEG.



Boeing and Podletnov:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm




Dr. Eugene Podkletnov:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyAFElQZcU

Podkletnov:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005

Dr. Podkletnov describes his “force beam generator” experiment and his
improvements to increase the experimental gravity-beam. The force beam
is generated by passing a high-voltage discharge from a Marx-generator
through a YBCO emitter suspended in a magnetic field. He described it as
being powerful enough to knock over objects in the lab as well as capable
to punch holes in solid materials. After careful testing, Podkletnov found
the speed of the impulse to be approx. 64 times the speed of light (64c),
which he indicates doesn't conflict with interpretations of Relativity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html

"Podkletnov claims the gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5
megavolt drop onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed in
a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around the apparatus."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-on-
gravity-shielding.html

"Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column
above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above
the disc attached to a balance. The balance behaved strangely. We
substituted silicon and still the balance was very strange. We found that
any object above the disc lost some weight, and we found that if we rotated
the disc, the effect increased."
“Pulses are powerful enough to punch through brick, concrete, and deform
light-metals "like hitting it with a sledgehammer".

"The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been
measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all
materials without a decrease in force."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-on-
antigravity.html



Article:
http://www.nano.org.uk/news/965


http://phys.org/news/2011-03-space-chessboard.html




http://gizmodo.com/pouring-saltwater-over-graphene-generates-
electricity-1563379860















Funny quotes to look back on from “experts” of their day.

''The Bomb will never go off; I speak as an expert in explosives."
- - Admiral William Leahy , US Atomic Bomb Project

"There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom."
-- Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
-- Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895

"Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value."
-- Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy, in France.

"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
-- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the march of science, 1949

"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."
-- Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment
Corp., 1977

"The super computer is technologically impossible. It would take all of
the water that flows over Niagara Falls to cool the heat generated by
the number of vacuum tubes required."
-- Professor of Electrical Engineering, New York University

"But what is it good for?"
-- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM,
1968, commenting on the microchip.

This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously
considered a means of communication. The device has inherently no
value to us."
-- Western Union internal memo, 1876.

"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who
would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"
-- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for
investment in the radio in the 1920s.

"If I had thought about it, I wouldn't have done the experiment. The
literature was full of examples that said you can't do this."
- - Spencer Silver on his adhesives for 3-M "Post-It" Notepads.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->