P. 1
Point- Tracking Solar Battery Charger

Point- Tracking Solar Battery Charger

|Views: 21|Likes:
Published by leardpan

More info:

Published by: leardpan on Jan 05, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less






Circle 521

Maximum-Power-PointTracking Solar Battery Charger
W. STEPHEN WOODWARD Venable Hall, CB3290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290; e-mail: woodward@net.chem.unc.edu.


ustainable electrical sources like solar photovoltaic arrays are becoming increasingly important as
+ – 16 0.068 F3 5 CAP VCC VCC 2 VIN 1N4148 P-GATE P-DRIVE N-GATE LTC1149 +10 V 15 SHUTDOWN 2 VFB 10 1 4 13

environmentally friendly alternatives to fossil fuels. But, while they’re nice for the environment, sustainable sources

aren’t always easy to apply. These sources are characterized by both stringent peak-power limitations and “use it or lose it” availability. Successful application of sustainable energy sources therefore depends on strict attention to efficiency in both power conversion and energy storage. For small systems, workable energy-management schemes usually include a rechargeable battery and battery charger. A shortcoming of this solution is that ordinary battery chargers, even efficient ones, do an imperfect job of squeezing the last milli-

From "12 V" 5 to 20 W solar array 10 F + 16 V



50 F 50 V 100 H

+12 V @ 2 A max To load

0.047 F 1N5819

R8 49.9k 1% R7 226k 1%

RT T 150 F 16 V OS-CON +

Couple thermally

IRFZ34 VP 100 pF 9 8 1000 pF

+ 12 V ~10 Ahr – lead-acid R1 1k C1 1 F 4 7 S3 9 3 5 R2 Null 1M 1M +10 V 2 15 16 Duty-factor dither (50 Hz) 8 1 4053B 13 S2 10 14 6 S1 11 1M C2 0.01 F R9 2M

R5 2M

R6 360k

26.1k 1%



Load GND C3 0.1 F


CT 11 150 pF

+10 V

R3 2.4M VC 2M

1 R4 20M


– +

2 3

Panel GND

RT = PNT122-ND (50k @ 25°C)

470 pF 7 LMC6062

8 A2 4 470 pF

– +

6 5



1. This Maximum-Power-Point-Tracking charger, used in small solar power systems, overcomes the shortcomings of ordinary battery chargers.


assume battery B1 is in a state of discharge. sometimes called Maximum Power Point Tracking. The voltage. I). By contrast. This mode of operation continues as B1 charges and its voltage rises to the ≈14. This dc error signal. Simple direct connection of panel to battery will therefore cause inefficient operation at point “A. if the SMPS happens to be operating at a VIN below the maximum power point (VIN < VMPPT). R2 allows for A1 offset nulling.IDEAS FOR DESIGN 2. Standard design approaches dictate an increased number of cells to provide usable charging currents for “normal” ranges of solar insolation. Instead. the optimization circuit doesn’t let that happen. The principle in play. The I/V and P/V curves are given for a typical photovoltaic array when exposed to “standard” sunlight intensity of 1 kW/m2. operation at V IN > V MPPT reverses the dither phase relationship and A1 ramps toward higher duty factors and lower VIN. when either is combined with constant field alternators. is illustrated in the I/V and P/V curves for a typical photovoltaic array (Fig. due to its similar power output versus loading characteristics. is integrated by A1 to close a feedback loop around A2.g. 1). A2 saturates with zero output and normal LTC1149 constant-voltage regulation takes over. 50-Hz multivibrator S1/S2 causes A2 to continuously dither Q1’s duty factor by about ±10%. 2) exposed to “standard” sunlight intensity (insolation) of 1 kW/m2. and power produced by any of these sources is highly variable in response to ambient conditions (insolation. which is particularly important at low panel output levels. The 50-Hz ac waveform across RSENSE is filtered by R1C1 and synchronously demodulated by S3. Either way we get convergence toward VMPPT and maximum charging current for B1. It works by continuously optimizing the interface between the solar array and battery. RT provides temperature compensation appropriate for typical lead-acid battery chemistry. each of these sources is characterized by exactly one ideal load impedance. these panels can produce up to 50% more voltage and 30% more power than the battery wants.1-V terminal-voltage setpoint determined by the R6-R7-R8-R T net- . and A1 will ramp toward lower average duty factors and higher VIN. The result is a dither of approximately ±1 V in VIN. 116 ELECTRONIC DESIGN / SEPTEMBER 14. adding a blocking diode would actually reduce overall efficiency. work.” with the excess power lost as heat in the solar panel. In this condition. E1 will accept all of the current the SMPS can supply (subject to the ≈2. To understand how it works. or windspeed) and dramatically dependent on the electrical impedance of the imposed load (V vs. There’s also a corresponding 50-Hz modulation of the average power extracted from the solar panel as reflected in the return current through RSENSE. watt from sustainable sources over realistic combinations of ambient and battery conditions. Figure 1 does better than that by combining a high-efficiency (≈95%) SMPS circuit (LTC1149) with an analog power-conversion optimization loop. such as the “Pelton-wheel” impulse turbine (above).5-A current 3. Under any combination of ambient conditions. However. The MPPT technique has much wider application than just photovoltaics alone. when lighting conditions happen to be more favorable. Consequently. designers of solar panels make the number of cells large enough so that a useful level of charging current is provided even when the light level is low and the battery voltage is high. 1998 limit set by R SENSE ) at a voltage around 12 V. but since the drain—even in total darkness—is less than 3 mA (comparable to typical battery self-discharge rates). hydrostatic head. The circuit makes no provision for preventing reverse current from being drawn from the battery under no-light conditions. The Maximum-Power-Point-Tracking (MPPT) technique also can be applied to other sustainable energy sources like small water turbines. If U1 drives Q1 to a 100% duty factor. whose polarity indicates the slope of the solar panel I/V curve wherever VIN happens to be sitting. For example. That’s because conceptually similar functionality of power output versus loading can be seen in the I/V curves of other sustainable energy sources. inefficient operation at the direct-connect point “A” will result. then there will be a positive correlation between VIN and ISENSE. The circuit shown addresses this problem in small solar power systems (Fig. the “Peltonwheel” impulse turbine of Figure 3) and fixed-pitch-rotor wind-power turbines. Such sources are small water turbines (e. Once reached. current. To accommodate a useful range of insolation and battery voltage variation.

It just blindly climbs the I/V curve to the VMPPT summit.IDEAS FOR DESIGN which will result in operation at VMPPT and maximum power transfer. it’s the fluid dynamics of the turbine or “runner” as they relate to the pressure and volume of the available water source. consult Linear Technology LTC1149 application literature. temperature. the dominant parameter is the interaction of “Tip Speed Ratio” (defined as turbine peripheral velocity divided by wind speed) with the aerodynamic design of the turbine. For wind-power generators. But the MPPT charger really doesn’t care about these details. In addition. For small hydroelectric generators. Consequently. 1998 . Figure 1’s circuit can therefore be easily adapted to any of these systems.1 µF to 1 µF) to slow the dither rate to 5-Hz to 0. wind-power applications will benefit from an overspeed preventer. Also of benefit is the simplifying absence of confusing local maxima in the power versus voltage curves. This VIN-limiting circuit is basically just a big Zener diode connected across the input terminals that dumps excess power in conditions of high wind speeds and low battery demand. 118 ELECTRONIC DESIGN / SEPTEMBER 14.5-Hz frequencies compatible with the inertial time constant of mechanical power sources. the primary energy-producing process is recombination of photoelectric charge carriers and how the rate of such recombination varies with output voltage. In the case of photovoltaics. and insolation. the actual physics behind the I/V curves for the various sources are very different. it prevents overrevving of the turbine and alternator. Of course. The only modification necessary is a bigger C2 (0. For higher power applications (25 W and up) or other output voltage ranges.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->