You are on page 1of 1

From:CindySage[mailto:sage@silcom.com] Sent:Tuesday,January11,20115:52PM To:Callaway,Jenny;Cooper,Lawrence Subject:SageAssociatescommentonCCSTreport Theconclusionsareindistinguishablefromtheindustrymantrathatsaysproofbeyond anydoubtisrequiredaboutwirelesshealthrisksbeforetakingprecautions. Itisrecklesstorequire'clearevidence'ofharmasapreconditionfortaking reasonableactionsforprevention.InstallingmillionsofRFtransmittersinpeoples' homes whenwealreadyhavesubstantialscientificevidenceabouttherisksofchronic,low levelRFisarisknotworthtaking.Especiallywithoutanydiscussion,ordisclosuretothe publicabouttradeoffsmadewithouttheirknowledgeorconsent. WhatCCSTshouldhavedonewastoadvisetheLegislaturetopressindustryandthe CPUCforverydetailedcomputermodelingtoproveRFlevelscomply(ordonotcomply) withFCCstandardsinthemannertheyarebeinginstalledandoperated.

ed.Andtolookat whatlowlevelRFexposuresmightposeasahealthrisk,giventhemillionsofpeople whocaredeeplyaboutthisbecause'theyaretheexperiment'. ItisbetterfortheCPUCandgovernmentagenciestomakemidcoursecorrectionsnow, thantogoforwardwithinadequateinformation. OurreportidentifiedpossibleFCCviolationsinthemannerthatmanymetersare installedandoperated.CCSThadnonewdatafromindustryoranyotherindependent expertgroupstoevaluate,sowhyissuean"allclear"? Comparingwirelessmeterstootherwirelessdevicesthatarevoluntary,andwhich manypeoplechoosenottouseisnotafaircomparisontogovernmentmandated metersthatexposepeopleintheirhomes24hoursaday.Particularlywhenthese devicesarealreadyreportedtodoubletheriskofmalignantbraincancersinhalfthe timeittakesforlowdoseionizingradiationtodosoinhumans. Thecostsforhavingguessedwrongislikelytohaveenormouseconomicandpublic healthconsequencesforCaliforniansfordecadestocome. CindySage,MA SageAssociates CoEditor,BioInitiativeReport ResearchFellow,DepartmentofOncology,OrebroUniversityHospital,Sweden (805)9690557

You might also like