First: How to win every political argument in 3 minutes: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com:80/Find-Freedom.htm?

At=028637&From=News http://adventuresinlegalland.com/ http://www.freedomsphoenix.com:80/Find-Freedom.htm?At=027632&From=News http://www.adventuresinlegalland.com/index.php?/content/view/84/33/

Beating Civil Traffic Tickets
Part 1. All traffic tickets are invalid.
This information (and video) is about beating civil traffic tickets, dealing specifically with the issue of standing to complain. If a plaintiff lacks standing, then courts are "legally" unable to proceed. Bureaucrats hate when this issue is raised because it destroys any pretense of fairness they are so desperate to maintain.

“Without standing, there is no actual or justifiable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases.” Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333,335.

jurisdiction to determine the cause… A court lacks discretion to consider the merits of a case over which it is without jurisdiction.” Miss. So. …Pardons & Paroles,
896 A.2nd 809,812 (Conn. 2006) A complaint (ticket) is not synonymous with a cause of action. “Governments are… established to protect and maintain individual rights.” (Stop laughing.) Courts are part of the government. The jurisdiction of the court is limited to this, therefore for there to be a case or controversy, (the courts have consistently held) there has to be a violation of someone’s rights and damage. “A plaintiff must allege personal injury” – Allen v. Wright, 468 US 737,751; U.S. Supreme Court Police officer must file a valid cause of action; otherwise there is no standing and the court has no subject matter jurisdiction, and therefore cannot proceed against you. “Standing is a necessary component of subject matter jurisdiction.” Rames v. Byrd, 521 US 811 You must have subject matter jurisdiction even in a traffic case. “Standing is perhaps the most important of [the jurisdictional] doctrines… Standing represents a jurisdictional requirement which remains open to review at all stages of the litigation…” NOW, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 US 249. “The requirement of standing has a core component derived directly from the Constitution. A plaintiff must allege personal injury (the violation of a legal right) fairly traceable to the defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984).
(Reader is wise to verify this information before relying on it.)

“If a party is found to lack standing, the court is without subject matter

Beating Civil Traffic Tickets

1/2

This requires the "judge" to strike the witness's testimony. Impeached means legally disqualified from testifying.) #1: Did you file a valid cause of action against me? (Usually they will answer. keep the following tips in mind. 9. Don’t bring your own opinion or arguments to convince the judge. 7. 8. calls for a legal conclusion.”) #2: How many elements are in a valid cause of action? (Usually. as the judge is now required to strike all of the testimony. or the prosecutor to commit to positions.” 5. Beating Civil Traffic Tickets 2/2 . 28 August 2007 Traffic courts are scams run by criminals. the witness is not competent to testify. Impeaching a Witness (police officer) There is usually only one witness against you in a traffic case – if they show up. Stay on point. “Yes. If you're unfortunate to have gotten a traffic ticket. – and now you want the matter dismissed. “Me. including prior testimony (the ticket). in one way or another you’ll hear something like… “Objection. Two Questions: (Maintain a positive attitude. 6. percent of his/her cases – plea bargains not to be considered. Repeat. Use those positions/arguments against the judge or prosecutor.Part 2.”) The judge will sustain the objection. Stick to the facts. Smile! 2. your chances of getting it kicked out are much greater: 1. I am not an attorney I don’t understand. Ask questions. 3. Get judge and. Top 10 Tips For Traffic Court Tuesday. 4. Don’t object and press a particular point more than twice. Only accept responsive answers to questions. or more. and then 10. It is easy to impeach a police officer by asking only two questions. Do not be argumentative.the testimony is inadmissible and the Judge has no discretion to accept the testimony. which is exactly what you are looking for. NOTICE: Presented in public interest – not meant to be legal advice – if you are in need of legal advice you are admonished to seek competent legal counsel – competent legal counsel may be interpreted as an Attorney who will actively stand for your rights and who has won 85.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.