2003
Cardiovascular Deaths
13%
Stroke
4%
HF
6%
6%
17%
Rheumatic Fever/Rheumatic
Heart Disease
Other
1900 - 2003
Deaths from Cardiovascular Disease
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
00
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
19
00
Deaths in Thousands
900
Years
CDC
Deaths in Thousands
1979 to 2003
Gender Differences in Deaths from CVD
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
79 80
85
90
95
00
03
Years
Males
Females
Age-Adjusted Cardiovascular
Death is Declining
pick
HDL-C
8, 9 10 TC LDL-C
H
HDL-C
70 HDL-C >40mg/dl
4S (1021 >65 )
MIRACL, HPS -
75 325 mg / die 25%
20% - 25%
27%
25% - 30%
CHD
0-1
2+
5168 assigned
atorvastatin
5137 assigned
placebo
Hypertension
Age 55 years
Male
Microalbuminuria/proteinuria
Smoker
Family history of early coronary disease
Type 2 diabetes
Plasma TC-HDL-C 200mg/dL
Certain ECG abnormalities
LVH
Previous cerebrovascular events
Peripheral vascular disease
84
81
62
33
26
24
14
14
14
10
5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
10mg
(mm Hg)
170
Placebo
: 164/95
: 138/80
160
150
140
130
0
LLA Close-out
100
(mm Hg)
95
90
85
80
75
LLA Close-out
Sever PS, et al, for the ASCOT Investigators. Paper presented at: 52nd Annual Scientific Session of the American College of
Sever
Cardiology.
PS, Dahlf
April B,
2, Poulter
2003; Chicago,
N, Wedel
IL.H, et al, for the ASCOT Investigators. Lancet. 2003;361:1149-58
Atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5168)
Placebo (n = 5137)
36%
relative risk
reduction
in nonfatal
MI and fatal
CHD
P=.0005
HR = 0.64 (0.50-0.83)
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Years
Sever PS et al, for the ASCOT Investigators. Lancet. 2003;361:1149-1158.
5.0
Atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5168)
Placebo (n = 5137)
45%
relative risk
reduction
in nonfatal
MI
P =.0002
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Years
Data on file. Pfizer Inc, New York, NY.
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
% of Deaths
40
30
20
10
0
Ischemic Other Diabetes Cancer
heart
heart
disease disease
Stroke Infection
Other
Stroke
Intermittent claudication
Cardiac failure
CAD
Male
Female
MI
Angina pectoris
Sudden death
Coronary mortality
0
TG
HDL-C
LDL
VLDL
VLDLR
IDL
TG
apo B
LDL
LDL
4S
Placebo
n = 97
SimvaStatin
n = 105
R.R ()
24 (24.7%)
15 (14.3%)
CHD
17 (17.5%)
12 (11.4%)
36%
CHD
44 (45.4%)
14 (13.3%)
55%
50 (51.5%)
18 (17.2%)
32%
43%
STATIN worse
STATIN
(10269)
PLACEBO
(10267)
1007
1255
452
597
CVD
182
215
PVD
332
427
Diabetes
279
369
Previous MI
Other CHD (not MI)
No prior CHD
ALL PATIENTS
2042
(19.9%)
2606
(25.4%)
24%SE 2.6
24%SE
reduction
(2P<0.00001)
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Atorvastatin 10 mg/day
(n=1428)
2838 patients
Placebo
(n=1410)
4-year followfollow-up
CARDS -
40--75
40
,
,
TG 600 mg/dL
:
:
, ,
,
CARDS -
LDL
HDL
(IQR)
(IQR)
207 (185(185-229)
207 (186(186-228)
118 (100
100--137
137))
119 (100
100--138
138))
53 (46(46-61)
52 (45(45-60)
150 (106(106-212)
150 (106(106-212)
(mmol/L)
LDL (mmol/L)
-26%
-40%
3
4
2
2
1
0
0
0
4.5
4.5
(%)
37% (95% CI: 17-52)
P=0.001
15
Placebo
127
37%
10
83
0
0
Placebo 1410
Atorva
1428
4.75
1351
1392
1306
1361
1022
1074
651
694
305
328
Placebo*
Atorva*
(CI))
(CI
37% (17(17-52)
p=0.001
77 (5.5%)
51 (3.6%)
36% (9(9-55)
34 (2.4%)
24 (1.7%)
31% ((-16
16--59)
39 (2.8%)
21 (1.5%)
48% (11(11-69)
.2 .4 .6 .8
* N (% )
1 1.2
Placebo
CHD
0-1
2+
MI
Stroke
MI
5-7 risk
3-4 risk
Stroke
2-3 risk
9 risk
4 risk
2-3 risk
PAD
Kannel. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1994, Wilterdink et al. Arch Neurol. 1992, Crique, et al. N Engl J Med. 1992
+
-
( )
LDL
LDL
< 70 mg/dl
baseline LDL<100
mg/dl
(%)
TNT
20
?
15
10
10mg
80mg
S =
P = placebo
0
60
(1.6)
80
(2.1)
100
(2.6)
120
(3.1)
140
(3.6)
160
(4.1)
180
(4.7)
200
(5.2)
LDL-C
140
120
4.0
3.5
3.0
LDL-C = 101mg/dL
100
2.5
80
2.0
P<0.001
60
LDL-C = 77mg/dL
1.5
40
1.0
20
0.5
0
0 3
12
24
36
48
60
LDL-C (mmol/L)
LDL-C (mg/dL)
160
()
LaRosa JC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005:352
:
*
0.14
0.12
= 22%
10mg
0.10
80mg
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
3
()
* , , (),
LaRosa JC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005:352
Mortality on AMI
Mortality after AMI
HDL
PPL
VLDL
LDL
vs.
6-8
16-18
24
N o n fa s ti n g t r i g l y c e r i d e s
m m o l/ L
m g/dL
M y o c a r d i a l i n f a r c ti o n
M en
1
1 - 1.99
2 - 2.99
3 - 3.99
4 - 4.99
5
W o m en
1
1 - 1.99
2 - 2.99
3 - 3.99
4 - 4.99
5
6400 M en
1 1 0 0 E ve n ts
< 89
8 9 17 6
1 77 2 65
2 66 3 53
3 54 4 42
4 43
76 0 0 W om en
6 9 0 E ve n ts
< 89
8 9 17 6
1 77 2 65
2 66 3 53
3 54 4 42
4 43
0 .5
16
32
Is c h e m ic s tro k e
M en
1
1 - 1.99
2 - 2.99
3 - 3.99
4 - 4.99
5
W o m en
1
1 - 1.99
2 - 2.99
3 - 3.99
4 - 4.99
5
6400 M en
7 8 0 E ve n ts
< 89
8 9 17 6
1 77 2 65
2 66 3 53
3 54 4 42
4 43
7 60 0 W o m en
7 5 0 E ve n ts
< 89
8 9 17 6
1 77 2 65
2 66 3 53
3 54 4 42
4 43
0 .5
16
32
H a z a r d r a tio ( 9 5 % c o n fid e n c e in te rv a l)
REVERSAL:
-
**
Placebo
Run--in
Run
Phase
80 mg
654
* IVUS
40 mg
18-
: , , -,
34
Nissen SE, et al. JAMA. 2004;291:1071-1080.
:
P=0.02
TAV (%)
2.7*
-1
-0.4
, mm3
LDL-C
(n=249)
(n=253)
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-15
-20
-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10
10
20
10
20
% LDL-
LDL-C >50%
.
LDL-C
.
95% (CI)
2005.
105091
11%
19%
2%
18%
30%
20%
2005.
105091
11%
19%
2%
18%
30%
20%
25
43%
40%
27%
30%
30%
20%
10%
0%