This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Chapter 2 addresses the following questions: Q1 What are different ways to describe cost behavior? Q2 What is a learning curve? Q3 What process is used to estimate future costs? Q4 How are the engineered estimate, account analysis, and two-point methods used to estimate cost functions? Q5 How does a scatter plot assist with categorizing a cost? Q6 How is regression analysis used to estimate a mixed cost function? Q7 What are the uses and limitations of future cost estimates? These learning questions (Q1 through Q7) are cross-referenced in the textbook to individual exercises and problems.
The textbook uses a coding system to identify the complexity of individual requirements in the exercises and problems. Questions Having a Single Correct Answer: No Symbol This question requires students to recall or apply knowledge as shown in the textbook. This question requires students to extend knowledge beyond the applications e shown in the textbook. Open-ended questions are coded according to the skills described in Steps for Better Thinking (Exhibit 1.10): Step 1 skills (Identifying) Step 2 skills (Exploring) Step 3 skills (Prioritizing) Step 4 skills (Envisioning)
2.1 This function has both fixed costs and variable costs. If at least part of the cost is variable; total cost increases as production volumes increase. If at least part of the cost is fixed, the average total per-unit cost decreases because the average fixed cost decreases as volume increases.
Q 2.2 Several years’ worth of data for August would be helpful for estimating the overhead cost function for subsequent Augusts, but the August data should not be used for estimating the overhead cost function for other months during the year. It is highly unlikely that the August data would be representative of the data during normal operations. However, August’s costs are probably a good estimate of the fixed costs for other months. When zero production occurs, only fixed costs are incurred. Since time appears to be of the essence, one of several cost estimation techniques might be employed. First, account analysis will provide a rough estimate. Second, the two most recent income statements could be used to approximate fixed and variable costs using the two-point method, but the president would need to understand that the quality of information could be low using this method. Third, if enough observations of cost data are readily available, regression analysis can be run. However, usually it takes more time to collect the data necessary to use regression analysis. The information leads to a conclusion that fixed costs exist because cost per unit changes between two levels of activity within the relevant range. The information is not sufficient to determine the amount of fixed costs or whether variable costs exist. The opportunities foregone could include spectator or participative sports activities, movies, going out to dinner, the opportunity to work at a part-time job, etc. The relevant cash flows include the cost of transportation, parking, tickets, food and beverages, and so on. There is no way to assign a quantitative value to the social experiences. It is difficult to identify a true opportunity cost because the costs and benefits of the next best alternative must be compared. However, lost wages, less the cost of transportation, can be quantified if the next if the next best alternative is working. Analysis of a scatter plot provided general information about whether a cost appears to be variable, fixed, or mixed. If there is a linear pattern in the scatter plot and the trend appears to go to zero, the cost could be variable. If a scatter plot with a linear trend intersects the vertical axis at a nonzero value, it could be mixed. If the scatter plot has no discernable pattern, the cost could be fixed. And if the pattern is linear with little or no slope, the cost could be fixed.
Chapter 2: The Cost Function
The pattern of a cost over time in the accounting system, together with knowledge of operations, is used to classify costs as variable, fixed, or mixed. Costs such as managers' salaries are usually fixed; they are often directly associated in the general ledger with a particular department or product. Costs for variable materials used in the production process are usually available in the general ledger or in production records. Costs such as manufacturing overhead are often mixed; they tend to include fixed costs such as insurance and property taxes for the plant and variable costs such as indirect supplies used in manufacturing. For costs identified as mixed, another cost estimation technique such as the two-point method or regression analysis must be used to determine the fixed and variable components. Learning curves are nonlinear representations of direct labor cost. The cumulative average time approach can be used to determine an approximation of total cost when labor experiences a learning rate. Economies of scale are a nonlinear function. Information about past experience with economies of scale can be used to help estimate future costs. For example, volume discounts are examples of economies of scale. The required volumes needed to reach discounted prices are generally known, so these can be estimated using several different ranges to reflect the changes in price. The cumulative average learning-time approach is a quantitative approach to calculating the average amount of time it should take to perform a task for people who are just learning to do the task. The director can use this formula to more accurately predict the amount of time it should take to deliver meals to the elderly. With a more accurate prediction, the volunteers’ schedules should also more accurately reflect the amount of time they need to set aside for their work at Meals on Wheels. The trend line developed using regression analysis incorporates all of the cost observations, while the two-point method uses only two observations. Because there is fluctuation in cost over time, better estimates are developed using more observations, because they better reflect the past fluctuations and therefore should better estimate future fluctuations.
2.11 Computer Manufacturer A. Production of a large monitor with a thin flat screen B. If all of the parts for the monitor are currently used in the organization, all of the information is likely to be contained in the accounting records. But new parts are most likely needed, since the monitor is large and probably involves different technology to achieve thin size. Thus, estimates of costs from suppliers will be needed. In addition, estimates for the amount of labor time will be needed. Although labor cost per hour can be found in the records, the amount of labor time is likely to be different for this monitor than for other monitors. If machines are used in production, an estimation of machine hours is necessary to determine whether maintenance and repair costs will increase. C. Estimating the cost of parts and the time involved in production is part of the engineered estimate of cost method. D. The opportunity cost of using idle capacity for one product is the contribution of other uses of the capacity. If another product could be manufactured and sold, that product’s contribution margin is the opportunity cost. If the capacity can be rented or leased out, the rent or lease payments are the opportunity cost. If there are no other uses for the capacity, the opportunity cost is zero. 2.12 Frida’s Tax Practice Cost Object Cost Subscription to personal tax law updates publication Ink supplies for tax department photocopy machine Portion of total rent for tax department office space Wages for tax department administrative assistant Tax partner's salary Charges for long distance call to Mr. Gruper about personal tax return questions Tax partner lunch with Mr. Gruper; the tax partner has lunch with each client at least once per year
Tax Department Personal Returns Mr. Gruper’s Personal Tax Return
A. B. C. D. E. F. G.
D D I D D D D
D I I I I D D
I I I I I D D
the tax partner probably spends some time in non-billable activities. and Piecewise Linear Cost Functions A.000 0 100 200 Number of Units 300 400 The cost function includes the following assumptions: • Operations are within a relevant range of activity • Within the relevant range of activity: o Fixed costs will remain fixed o Variable cost per unit will remain constant .000 $8. Of course. CPAs do keep detailed time records. so a portion of his or her salary is direct only to the tax department and indirect to the two other cost objects. 2. In a service business such as this.000 $10.000 $13. The time records that the tax partner maintains support this cost as a direct cost. the administrative assistant would have to maintain detailed time records as to time spent working on personal returns versus corporate returns. For the firm to make this cost direct for the personal returns cost object. Stepwise Linear. Now notice that the tax partner's salary is considered a direct cost for all three cost objects.00*Q Graph of Cost Function $14. TC = $10.000 Total Cost $12.000 + $8. the CPA's time is the product being sold.13 Linear. The benefits of tracking the cost at that level do not exceed the benefits of the information that would be obtained.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-5 Explanation for Parts D and E: Notice that the wages of the tax department administrative assistant are considered a direct cost when the cost object is the entire tax department but are considered indirect for the other two cost objects.000 $9.000 $11.
000 units: $450.2-6 Cost Management B.000 Total cost at 12.000 4.000 Calculate the variable cost per unit using the Two-Point method: Change in cost Change in volume = ($528.000 * $45 = $450.000 Number of Units C.000 $60.000 TC = $35.000 + $8.000 F = $450. Convert the average costs to total costs for each production level: Total cost at 10. TC = $25.000 Total Cost $50.000 + $39*Q .000 units = 10.$450.000 $0 0 1. for Q ≤ 2.000 units = 12.000 – 10.000 = $60.000 $20.000 .000 .000 $70.00*Q.000 = F + $39*10.000)/(12.000 3.000 2. it is first necessary to estimate the cost function.000) = $78. To estimate the costs at another production level. for Q > 2.$390.000 Combining the fixed and variable costs to create the cost function: TC = $60.000 = $39 per unit Use one data point in the total cost function and solve for F: Using the data for 10.000 $10.000 $30.000 * $44 = $528.00*Q.000 Graph of Cost Function $80.000 + $8.000/2.000 $40.
000 = $60.000 Estimated cost per unit = $645.000 $45.00*Q 2-7 Graph of Cost Function $75.000 $60.000 0 500 1.000 + (1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function Estimated total cost at 15.$9.000 $65.000/15.500 2.14 Piecewise Linear Cost Function A.000 units: TC = $60. total cost is estimated as: TC = $5. Inserting $10.00) + $9.000 + $39*15.500 2.000 + $10.000 TC = $51.000 + $9.000 $70.000 + $9.00*Q.000: TC = $50.000 * $10. for Q < 1.000 + $10.000 For Q > 1.000 Number of Units Slope is $10 per unit Slope is $9 per unit Total Cost .000 = $9.000 $50.000 $55.00*Q .000) TC = $50.000 + 45%*$10.000 = $43 D.000 in revenues into the cost function. TC = $50.000 + $585.00*(Q-1.000 = $645.000 1.
2-8 Cost Management B. This cost function would provide reasonable estimates for Q ≤ 1. then the cost function would appear to be: TC = $50.8 hours (average time for each of the next two returns) B.15 Tax Plus A. This cost function will either overestimate or underestimate costs for almost any level of Q (see Exhibit 2A.000 units but would underestimate total cost for Q ≤ 1.000 + $9. If all of the data estimation points occurred when Q was > 1.000 units.3219 Y = 4. 2. Hours for two returns would be determined as follows. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr Learning rate = 80% α = 6 hours X (units produced) = 2 Learning rate = (ln 0. 3. Graph of Learning Curve Cumulative Average Hours Per Return 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 Cumulative Number of Returns Prepared .00*Q. the cost function mismeasurement depends on the values of Q. 2.000 units.3219 Y = 6 hours*2-0.000 units but would overestimate total cost for Q > 1.00*Q.000 units.000 units. then the cost function would be some mixture of the functions for the two relevant ranges.3 and 2A. If the accountant did not detect that there were two different relevant ranges. This cost function would provide reasonable estimates for Q > 1. then the cost function would appear to be: TC = $51. There are three general situations: 1.4. If the data estimation points occurred across the two relevant ranges.80/ln2) = −0.000 + $10. If all of the data estimation points occurred when Q was ≤ 1.
In addition. B. 2. if the employee performs different types of tasks and records are not kept of the types of work performed) or if the employee does not work directly in production. but would still be considered fixed because it does not vary with production volume. their productivity increases. and variable costs remain constant within the relevant range. However. if time is not traced to individual bowls (for example. Assumptions: Fixed costs remain fixed within the relevant range. D. then wages would be an indirect cost. 2.25. it improves less quickly for the next return. Total clay cost will vary with the number of bowls made. V C. Eventually their learning will plateau. Assuming that the cost of clay can be traced to each bowl. it is a common cost of production for all of the bowls that are heat-treated in the kiln. it is a direct cost. However. Depreciation on the kilns is indirect because it cannot be directly traced to individual bowls. Wages are fixed because they remain constant (the employee always works 40 hours). F . wages are a direct cost. that is.000/$32.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-9 As the accounting graduates become more familiar with the tasks involved in preparing simple tax returns.] A.000 + 25%*Total sales B. I. If total variable costs were $8. D or I. Chapter 3 will point out another assumption for this cost function: the sales mix (the proportion of sales of different products) remains constant within the relevant range.000. this particular cost function assumes that variable costs are driven by sales. The cost probably does not depend on production volume (assuming depreciation is not based on units produced). or 25% of sales Combining fixed and variable costs.000 on total sales of $32.16 Bison Sandwiches A. then variable cost per dollar of revenue is calculated as follows: $8. F Assuming that employee time can be traced to each bowl.000 = 0. Note: Depreciation using a method such as declining balance is not constant over time. as their performance improves.17 Glazed Over [Note about problem complexity: Items F and H are coded as “Extend” because judgment is needed for categorization. and their productivity rate will remain stable. making it a fixed cost. the cost function is: TC = $20.
I.300 Variable $4. Also. F or M Pottery studio maintenance is an indirect and fixed cost if it is the same payment every week.500 ______ $4. Fixed Cost of ingredients Rent Store attendant (salaried) Total Costs at $9. making it an indirect cost. depending on what causes the cost to vary. I. it might not be traced to individual bowls. Packing costs are most likely variable because they will increase as production increases. I.2-10 Cost Management D.18 Yummy Yogurt [Note about problem complexity: Item A is coded as “Extend” because judgment is needed for categorization. F The business license is not related to production. J.] A. then this cost could be indirect. it is probably a mixed cost. It is mostly likely a flat fee or is calculated on a basis unrelated to production volume. If it is an hourly charge. G. 2. making it an indirect cost. V Assuming that the cost of packing materials is traced to each bowl. making it a fixed cost. V If the glaze is expensive and therefore a relatively large cost. if the cost is too small to justify tracing them). if the cost is small it might be grouped with overhead costs (variable). H. D or I.000 in sales $1. it is most likely traced to individual bowls. Advertising is not directly related to production. making them a common cost for multiple units and an indirect cost. This cost is also discretionary. V or F Brushes for the glaze are most likely used for multiple bowls. this is a direct cost.300 $3. If the packing materials are not traced (for example. I. making it an indirect cost. E. I. If the kiln is electric. F. depending on whether they are “used up” after a certain quantity of production. so it is treated as fixed.500 . If the cost of glaze is very small. D or I. making it a direct and variable cost. It might be fixed or mixed. F or M Electricity is an indirect cost because it cannot be traced to individual bowls. part of the cost might vary proportionately with volume. F I. They might be fixed or variable.000 2. because the production area may need more cleaning as volumes increase.
F. and the cost would vary with number of pizzas produced. this cost would most likely be fixed because the cost would not vary within a relevant range of activity.500/$9.19 Pizza Shop and Fishing Boat [Note about problem complexity: Items C.300 + 50%*Total revenue C. B. F. workers’ compensation. E. F or M Employee benefits occur in any business in which employees are hired. the cost function is: TC = $3.000 = 0.50. or M There would most likely be hourly wages in both types of businesses (assuming employees are hired). B. C. Therefore. B. and unemployment insurance. as well as voluntary items such as health insurance and retirement benefits.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-11 B. 2. While hourly wages may be related to number of fish caught. FB. In this type of situation. The opportunity cost is the contribution margin from the products sold with the flavor that has been replaced. In many organizations. so they would tend to be fixed or mixed (see Item A above). and G are coded as “Extend” because they require substantial business knowledge and/or ability to visualize cost behavior. Hourly wages on the fishing boat most likely vary with the number of days or hours the boat is out fishing. Benefit costs often vary with level of wages or salaries. V. they are more likely related to time on the boat than pounds of fish. F There would be no reason to incur fishing equipment costs in a pizza business. There most likely would not be any ingredients in a fishing boat business. because of uncertainty in the success of each fishing expedition.] A. In the fishing boat business. D. V Ingredients are used in making pizzas. The cost of rent is irrelevant because it will not change with either alternative. Benefits might include mandated items such as social security. or 50% of revenue Combining fixed and variable costs. In the pizza shop. PS. . costs vary with dollars of revenue. these costs would be mixed with a large proportion of the cost fixed. Some may be sent home if business is very slow. D. employees are likely scheduled in advance on a fixed schedule. total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) can be used in the cost function: Total variable cost/Total revenue = $4.
F Some type of utility costs (such as water and electricity) would be incurred in both types of business.95/2.5195 = $1.3489 $0. newspaper advertisements.15/45) 0.20 Hamburger Haven Following are calculations for the cost per unit of each ingredient and the cost of plan and cheeseburgers: Cheeseburger Cost per Unit Plain With Everything 1. there might be some utility costs for the fishing operation and for a business office.59/40) 0. Hamburger bun ($1.0033 0.1075 3. If the fishing boat is for tourists.0033 $0.6815 A. PS.$0.1619 0.0179 4. Mayonnaise [$1. B.2414 2.69/8) 0. Catsup ($.5196 Suggested selling price: 300% * $0.0198 9. B.49/(16 x 4)] 0. For the fishing boat business. F. Hamburger patty ($1.2-12 Cost Management E.1619) = $0. advertising costs would be incurred. depending on how the insurance cost is calculated.0179 0.69/7) $0. In general. Dill pickles [($8. Mustard ($.0233 7.0863 0. It will be a fixed cost if it is a flat amount. although the cost would probably be much higher for the pizza business because of the utilities needed to run the pizza shop.0148 0. G. but it might be mixed if a portion of the cost relates to levels of business activity.1075 0. however it would be unusual for a commercial fishing boat business to incur advertising costs because the customers are most likely canneries and distributors with whom the fishermen have an ongoing relationship.79/150) 0. F or M Any type of business will have insurance costs. F Most pizza shops incur advertising costs such as flyers.0053 0.56 . Lettuce ($.0148 6.59/16) 0. and yellow pages advertisements.2414 $0.6815 .0233 0.0053 8.29/12) 0. Cost of plain burger = $0.99/50) 0.1619 10.3489 (calculated above) B. Cost of burger with everything except cheese = ($0.0863 5.2414 $0. The cost might be fixed or mixed.0198 0.1075 0. 2. Because advertising costs tend to be discretionary. the utility costs for these two businesses would tend to be fixed (would not vary with production). Cheese ($2.000) * 4] 0. Onions ($. Tomato ($. they are treated as fixed costs.
Long is able to differentiate her hamburgers from others in the market. Therefore.Mostly fixed and discretionary H. she foregoes profits and people may believe there could be quality problems with her food. D.04 . This means that her costs need to be below the competitive price. Professional dues. the price of the plain hamburger should be: $2. B. If Ms. mostly variable G.Fixed F.04 Therefore.] A. The Step 2 questions (A.Fixed E. Selling price of cheeseburger with everything: 300% * $0. Alternatively. 2. Professional subscriptions.Fixed D. they set prices considering their competitors’ prices." However. Rent . Staff wages – Could be variable or mixed (salary + overtime) for regular staff. Office supplies . In the current business environment. that cost would be variable. Licenses. Property taxes. If there is part time help. Long’s prices are too high. she needs to know what competitors charge for a similar quality sandwich and price hers competitively. FICA taxes (Social Security taxes) – Mixed – mostly fixed because most employee wages would be fixed J. volumes will drop because customers will go to other fast food restaurants that sell hamburgers.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-13 C. B. Insurance.79 Some students will view this higher price as "unfair. then she may be able to charge a price that is higher than competitors—as long as customers are willing to pay the higher price.21 Spencer and Church [Note about problem complexity: These are difficult questions because students will need to first visualize the costs (with very little information) and then apply chapter concepts. Market forces will dictate achievable prices.Fixed .Mixed. However staff are often salaried.Fixed and discretionary I. Clerical wages – Fixed unless overtime is regularly scheduled. and then mixed C.6815 = $2. Alternatively.25 = $1. if her prices are too low. there is no moral obligation to maintain a 300% markup on each item. most organizations are price takers. that is. and F) are the ones requiring significant assumptions to generate an answer. in which case the total cost would be primarily fixed. if Ms.$0. It is just a general guideline.
23 Central Industries [Note about problem complexity: Item B is not coded as Step 1 because it is fairly clear which cost driver appears to be best. number of advertisements placed.22 Cost Function Using Regression. The adjusted R-Square indicates how much of the variation in the marketing department cost can be explained by variation in units sold.wiley. it is possible that marketing costs are discretionary. . 2. If this is the case. In this problem. the analyst could ask the CFO whether the marketing department budgets its costs through a negotiation process with top management. C. the cost is discretionary and will be set through the negotiating process.35*units sold.] The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2. Other possible cost drivers for marketing department costs could be revenue. Therefore. The cost analyst needs to gather information about how marketing costs are set each year. For example.com/college/eldenburg).) B. In addition. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. TC = $222.2-14 Cost Management K. Advertising – Fixed and discretionary 2. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. the variation in units sold explains about 61% of the variation in marketing department cost. the fixed cost is set at zero.com/college/eldenburg). or profits. (Notice that the T-statistics on the fixed costs indicate that it is not likely to be different from zero.wiley. Other Potential Cost Drivers A.
78591283 0.026826 0.61765897 0.119724 15 Coefficient s 884.000 $1. Potential Cost Driver: Output Maintenance Costs Against Output $2.4342166 0.500 Maintenance Costs $2.52099624 Standard Error 153.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-15 A.58824812 182.000514 .761602 4.000 $500 $0 0 500 1000 Output 1500 2000 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.58E-05 0.500 $1.113687834 Intercept Output t Stat 5.582691 P-value 6.
000 $1.7549386 1.457384 3.000 $500 $0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Direct Labor Hours Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.500 $1.717372 P-value 0.210849 15 Coefficient s 861.500 Maintenance Costs $2.017601 .36224828 0.31319046 235.60187065 0.02569657 Standard Error 261.2-16 Cost Management Potential Cost Driver: Direct Labor Hours Maintenance Costs Against Direct Labor Hours $2.113464425 Intercept Direct Labor Hours t Stat 3.291084 2.005847 0.
In a scatter plot. a good cost driver would present a linear or football-shaped positive slope or trend. the cost driver does not explain the variation in cost and either it is the wrong driver.000 $500 $0 0 20 40 Machine Set-Ups 60 80 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations Coefficient s 126. This indicates that the cost could be totally variable.6778973 0. For example.500 Maintenance Costs $2.357393 15.97410583 0.000 $1.94888217 0. If the observations are widely scattered. all three potential cost drivers appear to be positively related to maintenance costs.94495003 66.197755 8. Sometimes a cost that is mostly variable can be identified from a scatter plot. the trend line for machine setups looks as if the intercept could be zero or very close to zero. .96E-10 B.5343 P-value 0.42597461 1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-17 Potential Cost Driver: Machine Setups Maintenance Costs Against Machine Set-Ups $2. machine setups appears to be the most likely cost driver and direct labor appears to be the least likely cost driver.815737 29. However. In Part A.500 $1. or the cost is mostly fixed.5913391 15 Standard Error 93.910475729 Intercept Machine Setups t Stat 1.
but does not provide confidence that the intercept (fixed cost) part of the cost function is different from zero. .68* Machine Setups The machine setups intercept coefficient is not significant.025*Direct Labor Hours TC = $29. and technology can cause future costs to be different than estimated. so it is excluded from the cost function.2-18 Cost Management C. In the machine setups regression. The regression results and cost function for the three potential cost drivers are: Potential Cost Driver Output Direct labor hours Machine setups Adj. D.521*Output TC = $861 +$3. the cost is likely to be totally variable. R-Square 0.588 0. This means that variation in setups explains about 95% of the variation in cost. the economic environment. the t-statistic is significant for the independent variable but not for the intercept.945 Cost Function TC = $884 + $0. This provides confidence that the variable cost part of the cost function is not zero.945. Therefore.313 0. business processes. Changes in many factors such as resource prices. The regression using machine setups has the highest adjusted R-Square of 0. The use of past cost data to predict the future assumes that future resource costs and volumes of activities will remain the same as in the past. E.
100 – $632. the variable cost is calculated: ($68.000 = 0.132.605 = $11. which could be outliers.000/$500. the cost function is calculated using the highest and lowest values of the cost driver. the total cost function is: TC = $11. Total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) in the cost function because sales is a potential cost driver.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-19 PROBLEMS 2.333)/($1. . The high low method uses the most extreme cost driver values. First.100) = $25.$56. this cost function might provide poor estimates of future costs. Therefore.132. Under the high-low method.333 = F + 5%*$1.333 – $43.728 + 5%*Sales B. That means that the cost function might not represent the actual cost. or 5% of sales The fixed cost is determined by substituting the variable cost into one of the high-low data points: $68.24 Big Jack Burgers A.333 .728 Thus. that is.05. not represent the cost most of the time. on average.100 F = $68.
analysis at the account level might indicate that there are few fixed costs. Then. Based on the p-value. The upward slope of the line indicates that there are variable costs.800 + 4.162.000 $900.000 $1. Chart of data with trend line added by Excel.000 $40. Because this regression has few observations.5% x sales.5% x sales . the regression intercept can be used as an estimate of the fixed costs. the cost function would be TC = $16. but the p-value is greater than 10% at 0. Additional judgment is required to decide whether it is appropriate to include a fixed cost in the cost function. Analysis at the account level can be used to increase the understanding of this cost.2-20 Cost Management C. If this cost pool includes items such as salaries and other fixed costs (insurance. trend line extended to Y-axis (dashed line) using Word: Scatter Plot With Trend Line $80. There is a general downward slope (variable cost) that appears to meet the intercept enough above zero to suggest a fixed cost. D. A t-statistic greater than 2 is often interpreted as meaning that the coefficient is significantly different from zero. Notice that the t-statistic for the intercept coefficient is 2.000 $20.000 Sales It appears that the cost is most likely mixed. the cost function would be: TC = 4. Following is the regression output. etc). fixed costs are likely to be zero and would be excluded from the cost function. there is a 16% probability that the intercept (fixed cost) is not different from zero.172. the p-value result for the tstatistic is atypical.000 $0 $0 $300. Alternatively.200. In that case.000 Administrative Costs $60.000 $600. Then.
there does appear to be a general upward trend. Therefore. and possible changes in costs such as those described in Part E are ignored. This method can be used in cases where there is not enough data to perform regression. Cost Function Using Regression A.0319523 Intercept X Variable 1 E.17205158 5. .Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-21 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0. F. If there are more data points.2444 7734. Using the regression results.00818212 t Stat 2.25 Scatter Plot. Unusual cost items are assumed to continue in the future.90567454 3293. the high-low method may be the best option available. regression analysis incorporates all of the observations into the analysis. The plot shows costs that are widely scattered. The adjusted R-Square statistic is very low at 0. In addition. 2.04466925 0. Because of unforeseen changes in cost behavior.186. Future costs are not likely to be estimated accurately if the cost driver explains only a small part of the variation in the cost. Sales might not be the activity that drives administrative costs. There might be a large discretionary component in administrative costs. This means that variation in sales explains only about 18% of the variation in research and development cost. Both methods assume that the cost function is linear and that all data points come from a single relevant range.73545 0. and it can be further improved by adopting more representative data points than the highest and lowest values of the cost driver. Sales does not appear to explain much of the variation in research and development costs. The cons of the high-low method as an estimation technique were discussed in Part B above. The past costs used for estimation might not be representative. both of these methods assume that the data points are representative of future costs.93711636 0. especially because so few observations were used in the estimation.16197623 0.4038 4 Coefficients Standard Error 16800. If these assumptions do not hold.82%*Sales C. on average. causing fluctuations in cost that are unrelated to any cost driver.9680477 0. However.45937486 P-value 0. the results rely on more complete information and provide a better estimate.365 + 0. If there are only two or three data points. There might be a change in business operations or in the economy that would cause future costs to be different than in the past. then both methods may be unsuitable for estimating future costs. however. a cost function may not provide a good estimate for the next month’s costs. B. the cost function is: TC = $50.
E. The classification as direct or indirect depends on whether Susan’s calls are directly related to specific projects she works on or are indirect activities such as business promotion. that is. In this problem. Therefore. although she could use email. so she does not need to estimate the cost function using regression or any other estimation technique. Since she probably can cut back on calls when her consulting work is not providing enough income. In this problem. the cost of alternatives such as cellular service or any other types of telephone or communication service. Yes. 2. G. She cannot be certain that she will use the same amount of time. the cost is assumed to be linear within the relevant range. a portion of the cost is likely to be discretionary. D. Managers set the costs depending on the organization’s strategies and funds available for research and development. the relation makes sense from an economic standpoint. Since her consulting work varies. These costs are set by decision. the amount of traveling she will be doing since she cannot call from home when she is traveling. the underlying cost function is assumed to be linear and that the cost driver is assumed to be economically plausible as a cost driver. assuming that the cost function is linear may not be appropriate. Regression is useful for estimating a cost function when fixed and variable costs are unknown. C. on average. It also depends on whether she can trace telephone calls to individual . In addition. part of the cost is committed and cannot be reduced. B. When regression analysis is used to specify a cost function. Additional information could include the location of Susan’s future consulting work.26 Susan’s Telephone Service A. the number of calls and whether they are long distance or local calls will vary. F. as she has in the past. Since she has to have telephone service to stay in business. to make a decision she needs to compare her costs under the old plan to what costs would be under the new plan. The cost driver for long distance calls is the number of minutes on the telephone. usually annually. The scatter plot shows little evidence of linearity. It is likely that Susan has to call people to conduct business. The variable cost is 10 cents per minute for those minutes over 500 per month. research and development cost is often discretionary. Susan already knows the cost function.2-22 Cost Management D. The fixed cost is the $20 flat fee. H. First. fixed costs would remain fixed and variable costs would remain constant within that range. Better cost estimates for discretionary costs can be obtained by gathering information about planned expenditures from the department head or from the managers who are responsible for costs. Several very general assumptions apply to a linear cost function.
90/ln2) = −0. There are many different reasons that the time could be different from the amount determined above. so Susan may need to maintain her own records if she wishes to trace telephone usage.00 + (700-500)*$0. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr α = 10 hours X (units produced) = 4 Learning rate = (ln 0. which appears to be the other alternative (although the 5 cents per minute rate might not be available for daytime week day calls).00 $20. In this case the learning rate would be wrong and so the time would also be wrong.27 Fancy Furniture A. Cons • If Susan has a number of projects in her local area or will be traveling a lot. Here are some of the reasons. It is possible that the managers under.10 = $30.04 $0.057 The average cost is lowest at exactly 500 minutes per month. If her calls are over 400 minutes or under 600 minutes. Many cellular telephone bills do not list the calls made.05 $0.10 = $40.05 $0.00 Average Cost $0. she will pay a very high rate of 10 cents per minute 2.00 $20. she may be paying for 500 minutes of service that she does not use • If Susan’s calling volume exceeds 500 minutes per month.00 + (600-500)*$0. In .or overestimated the amount of hand work performed.152 Y = 8.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-23 consulting jobs. telephone costs are viewed as an indirect cost.067 $0. especially if she usually calls less than 500 minutes a month • Below is Susan’s average cost per minute at different levels of calls per month. Minutes 300 400 500 600 700 Total Cost $20.00 $20. I.00 $20. her phone bill will be less than it would be at a rate 5 cents per minute. Pros: • Susan might prefer the convenience of not switching telephone companies • If Susan is happy with her current quality of service she might prefer to stay with the same company and not investigate other companies’ plans • Susan may be able to predict her cost better.152 Y = 10 hours*4-0. In most businesses.1 hours (average time for the first four batches) B. Hours per batch would be determined as follows. students may think of others.
The chart suggests that a 90% learning curve is likely to occur if 25% of the work is hand assembly and 75% of the work is done by machine. and the University surcharge is specifically based on sales. The estimate of total costs given revenues of $80.2-24 Cost Management addition.500 10. Wildcat Lair costs: Purchases of prepared food Serving personnel Cashier Administration University surcharge Utilities Totals Fixed $ 30.000 = $79. However. or has a great deal of experience on the machine. if managers believe that 25% of the work is done by hand.28 Wildcat Lair A. 2.000 + 40%*80.000 Variable $21. If these values are used in a regression to estimate a cost function. If a worker is absent one day. the cost function is: TC = $47.40.000 Total revenue is the most likely cost driver for both variable costs.500 $47.000 1.000 Profit = Revenues – Total costs = $80.$79.000 using the cost function is: TC = $47.000 . C.000 = 0. then the cost would be overestimated. they would be higher than the labor costs in later periods. Thus.000/$70. C.000 .000 + 40%*Total revenue D. or 40% or revenue Combining fixed and variable costs. if managers believe that more than 25% of the work is done by hand. The observations of labor costs over the first few weeks would not be representative of the labor costs once productivity has stabilized. total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) can be used in the cost function: Variable cost = $28. Because revenue is the cost driver for both variable costs. then the chart suggests that the learning rate estimate is reasonable. the rate will change if the replacement employee has never worked on this machine. it is possible that different types of wood affect the rate at which chairs can be produced.000 7. D.000 = $1.000 5.000 _______ $28. and B. Food costs are likely to vary proportionately with sales. then this chart suggests that the learning curve will be slower than the 90% estimate.
C. Thus.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-25 E. Electricity costs also vary with changes in electricity rates.000 . so the trend would be the opposite of this plot. (This is the same as the previous 40% variable cost rate less the university surcharge of 10% of revenues.000.000 increase in revenues is expected to be $6.] A. the opportunity cost is estimated to be: Revenue Fixed costs Variable costs (30%*$80.000 + 30%*Total revenue During August. but this is not considered a cost driver (a business activity that causes variations in total variable cost). Lair’s fixed costs are assumed to be unchanged with the $10.000)+the university surcharge of $7. If the university were to close the Lair. this surcharge should be ignored when computing the university’s opportunity cost (assuming that the charge does not relate to any variable costs for the university that arise because of the Lair). if the bathing suit shop is located in a geographic region $80. F. Variable food costs are estimated to be 30% ($21. and the increase is estimated to be 40% of the increase in revenues.000 (-$5. Item D will be VERY difficult for most students. The shop is most likely a seasonal business. B.000 (47. it might even close when the ski area shuts down. To estimate the opportunity cost for August. the shop might experience very little business activity. costs would be higher when there were fewer sales.000) (24.000*40%).000/$70. A shop located near a ski area is likely to incur high heating costs during the winter. it would lose the revenues.000 ($10. So. less the fixed costs and the variable food costs.000 increase in revenues.000 . Because the university surcharge is an allocation within the university.$4. so the estimated profit in August is $1.000) of revenues.000. the variable cost part of the cost function can be adjusted. However. In a retail business. for July the opportunity cost would have been $2. total variable costs are expected to increase by $4.000+$6. During the spring and summer months.) The adjusted cost function is: TC = $47.000 ($10.000) Net 2. So. electricity usually varies with hours of operation and possibly with the season (because of heating and air conditioning). Assuming the highest electricity cost is during the winter when fewest bathing suits are sold.000) $ 9. Only total variable costs are expected to increase.000). the additional profit from a $10. generating most its sales around the ski season (fall and winter).29 Polar Bear Ski Wear [Notes about problem complexity: Item A is not coded as Step 2 because this is explicitly discussed in the chapter.000— the operating loss of $(5. In July there was a loss of $5.000).
they are discretionary expenditures and not caused by the level of activity. Higher profits. A correlation may appear in a scatter plot or regression analysis.69 x 5 = $1. and new office furniture or equipment.45 $ 514.028.22 Firm B set its selling price based on the average cost.67 1.69 (average cost for each of the 5 units) Total cost = $205.2-26 Cost Management where the highest electricity costs occur during the summer because of air conditioning. correlation does not necessarily mean causation.45 Although each customer paid a different price. higher profits generally occur during periods when activity is high.89 x 1. Although these expenditures are made because more money is available.2345 Y = $300*5-0.84 . given a 100 unit production level: Y = α Xr Y = $300*100-0. firm B's selling price is: $101. However.67 Firm A's income for last year was: Sales Costs Income $1.028. a 50% markup on total cost will cause sales to be: $1.89 (average cost for each of the 100 units produced) Given a 50% markup on cost. 2. then the highest sales might coincide with the highest electricity costs.2345 Y = $101. For example. employee training. special promotions.30 Firm A and Firm B Costs for Firm A in the first year would be determined as follows.50 = $1. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr α = $300 instead of hours X (units produced) = 5 Learning rate = (ln 0.2345 Y = $205.45 x 1. Many costs can be related to volume of activity. in turn.5 = $152.542.028.542.85/ln2) = 0. D. generally mean there is more money available to spend on administrative travel.
926.50 .50 $ 9.85 Thus Firm B's selling price this year was $64. Total cumulative production cost (300 x $78.00 13.84) = $1.50/150 units = $64.40 1.528.897.2345 Y= $78.897.625.55 1.30 $2.2345 (notice that the cumulative units produced is 15) Y = $158.528.50 = $97.028.028.45 $1.00 13.10 $ 172.97 (average cost for each of the 15 units produced) Total cost to produce the first 15 units (15 x $158.84) Costs (150 x $ 92.65) Income Firm A's revenues for this year are: (10 x $152. assuming an 85% learning effect would be: Y = $300*150-0.50 $ 9.356.97) Less costs from last year’s income statement for first five units Cost to produce the 10 units for this year Thus Firm A's income statement for this year is Sales Costs Income $1.75) Total costs to produce the first 150 (from last year’s income statement) Total costs of this year’s production (150 units) Average cost per unit = $9.40 Firm A's costs may be computed as follows: Y = $300*15-0.85 x 1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-27 Firm B's costs.727.50 Firm B's calculation for its selling price is as follows: Y = $300*300-0.384.10 $22.356.28 $23.75 (average cost for each of the 300 units) Note that the cumulative production for Firm B through this year is 300 units.727.2345 Y = $92.65 (average cost for each of the 150 units produced) Firm B's income statement for last year was: Sales (150 x $152.
28) Costs (150 x $64.com/college/eldenburg). Costs $165.000 $5.wiley.28 is lower than Firm A's average cost per unit: $1.000 $7.500. 2. such extreme differences in cost can occur.wiley. There is a positive slope. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.500.00 9.000 Sales B.727.10/10 = $135. .000 Marketing Dept.000 $6. A. Sales seems to be a potential cost driver because there appears to be a positive correlation between the marketing department costs and sales.500.000 $155.50 Note that Firm B's selling price for this year of $97.864.000 $135. Scatter Plot of Marketing Costs Against Sales $175. and most of the observations appear to have a fairly linear trend.356.500.50 $ 4. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.000 $8.31 Belford’s The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.85) Income $14.592.com/college/eldenburg).61.000 $145.2-28 Cost Management Firm B's income statement for this year is Sales (150 x $97. Such results often lead to charges of "unfair dumping" but with large differences in cumulative production volumes.
4501E-10 5. Even if marketing department costs are discretionary. When more money is spent on marketing. usually annually. Here is the regression output. Assuming that profits are more likely to increase when sales increase. E. Discretionary costs are set by decision.34%*Sales D. Instead.01335108 Standard Error 6844. it is economically plausible for sales to be a cost driver. the cost function is: TC = $65.584 + 1.7600071 P-value 2.86656716 Standard Error 4015. sales may go up. the cost estimate should not be based on past costs.87116829 Adjusted R Square 0. the decision maker(s) should be asked what next year’s cost will be.5289E-14 Intercept X Variable 1 Based on the regression results. using regression or any other technique. there would be a positive correlation between marketing department costs and sales. If the variable portion of the marketing cost is sales commissions. Therefore. .00097028 t Stat 9. Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. they may be positively correlated with sales.08144 Observations 30 Coefficients 65584. In addition.63816 0.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-29 C. F. discretionary costs such as marketing are often increased when profits increase.93336396 R Square 0.58184484 13.2608 0.
000 $0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Machine Hours .000 $120.000 $160.000 $0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Labor Hours Manufacturing Overhead Against Machine Hours Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200.000 $40.2-30 Cost Management 2.32 Peer Jets International The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.com/college/eldenburg). Manufacturing Overhead Against Labor Hours Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200.com/college/eldenburg).wiley.000 $80.000 $40. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. A.000 $160.000 $80.wiley.000 $120.
000 $80.000 $40. Costs and potential cost driver data are plotted to determine whether further analysis is necessary.682 4.11279932 R Square 0.000 $120. the cost driver does not explain the variation in cost. Based only on the cost plots.000 $0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Raw Materials B.02253618 Standard Error 11114.01272369 Adjusted R Square -0. but the plot for labor hours appears to have the least trend.600936029 Intercept Labor Hours t Stat 10. either the driver is wrong or the cost is mostly fixed.600712 P-value 6.552864 .1543 0.50852 7.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-31 Manufacturing Overhead Against Raw Materials Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200. Sometimes a cost that is mostly variable.56597156 30 Standard Error 14812. D. Labor Hours Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. labor hours could be deleted as a potential cost driver. C. If the observations are widely scattered. Analysis of the plots involves looking for a linear or football-shaped positive slope or trend.000 $160.86E-11 0. The plots help determine whether regression analysis should be performed using any of the potential drivers.8173 Observations Coefficient s 150410. None of the plots show a definite trend.
082222 P-value 3.68E-12 0.004579 Both the intercept and slope coefficients are significant.411 Machine Hours Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.215128 Standard Error 10853.331580777 Intercept Machine Hours t Stat 11.62907 3.67 38.11E-12 0.095468 P-value 4.22*Machine hours Raw Materials Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $126. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $117.599 + $38.3746211 Adjusted R Square 0.22* Raw materials .4268 4.5033241 R Square 0.217192 Standard Error 10291.1555 Observations 30 Coefficient s 117598. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $150.2-32 Cost Management Only the intercept term is significantly different from zero.9786 Observations 30 Coefficient s 126216.56778 19.53627459 Intercept Raw Materials t Stat 11.2266685 Standard Error 9665.000325 Both the intercept and slope coefficients are significant.217 + $60.2533351 Adjusted R Square 0.91 60.3522862 Standard Error 8846.612063 R Square 0.47803 9.
8266982 Adjusted R Square 0.489 -0.210187 P-value 3.218173 8. however. 2.08E-08 .976635 Standard Error 10361.2349 3.wiley.5558 Observations 30 Coefficient s 60988.953575 1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-33 E. F.352 0.05878 9.886218 -0. this driver explains only 35% of the variation in cost.wiley. Labor hours can be eliminated as a potential driver because its coefficient is not significantly different from zero (see Part D). Multiple regression with all three potential cost drivers: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.778501 82. A. the direct labor hours was not significantly related to manufacturing overhead costs using simple regression. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.33 Peer Jets International (continued) The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.10654585 Intercept Labor Hours Machine Hours Raw Materials t Stat 5.3E-06 0. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. and the adjusted R-Squares from the regressions are: Machine Hours Raw Materials 0.com/college/eldenburg).333162437 5.9092294 R Square 0.12E-09 1.8067018 Standard Error 4832.226 Based on the simple regression results. Yes.com/college/eldenburg).1959303 48. The coefficients for each of the other potential cost drivers are significantly different from zero.291558412 10. machine hours appears to do the best job of explaining manufacturing overhead costs.
C. Manufacturing can be a complex activity requiring a number of different tasks.55) $38.22 (0.78 (<0. its coefficient is not significantly different from zero in either regression.81383627 Standard Error 4742. A combination of cost drivers does a much better job of explaining the variation in manufacturing overhead costs than either cost driver alone. Both machine hours and raw materials are positive and significantly different from zero when using simple regression and also when using multiple regression.352 and 0.001) $60. Costs for these activities are likely related to specific cost drivers. Labor hours does not appear to be a cost driver when using either simple regression or multiple regression.001) B.001) $4.664851 5.217 (<0.20 (0.226 0.925842 30 Standard Error 8743.599 (<0. machine hours and raw materials explain different activity .939606 9. Multiple regression using machine hours and raw materials as cost drivers: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.450561 8.74*Machine hours + $82.005) $82.157604083 9.5902 48.5348 Observations Coefficient s 60677.57 (0. R2 Simple Regressions: Labor Hours Machine Hours Raw Materials Multiple Regression 0.954) $48. Each task includes different activities. The adjusted RSquare is far higher in the multiple regression (0.98 (<0.022 0.2-34 Cost Management Comparison of simple and multiple regression results: Intercept t-stat (p-value) Independent Variables t-stat (p-value) Labor Machine Raw Hours Hours Materials Adj.93*Raw materials D.226) for these two cost drivers.352 0.001) $126.90921678 R Square 0.22 (<0.806) than in either of the simple regressions (0. its coefficient is negative rather than positive in the multiple regression.391636 P-value 1.411 (<0. Also.001) $60.86E-07 4.988 (<0.29E-09 The cost function is: TC = $60.001) $-0. In this example.7422519 82.806 $150. labor hours can be eliminated as a potential cost driver.881964042 Intercept Machine Hours Raw Materials t Stat 6. Thus.678 + $48.71E-10 5.82667515 Adjusted R Square 0.001) $117.
Regina has at least two choices in this situation. She can tell the Director of Finance that she cannot produce a very accurate budget within two days or she can pull together something that may not be very accurate. and that could reflect negatively on the Finance Director. C. and materials handling for the units.34 Software Solutions A.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-35 costs. They may either praise or criticize top management when the situation may not warrant it. More importantly. the department amounts and total budget may be quite inaccurate. She may believe that her reputation as a diligent employee would suffer if she cannot produce something. If Regina submits unrealistically low budgets this month and then more accurate budgets next month. B. her reputation would also suffer. such as a business expansion. but with large increases in department costs. If they have outdated information and inaccurate information. A better understanding of the manufacturing process improves the ability to determine the types and number of cost drivers that can be used in a more complete cost function. The board of directors monitors the performance of the CEO and top management. They may also use the inaccurate information to help them approve decisions. However. When the budget is complete the board will likely see it again and notice the discrepancies between the preliminary and actual budgets and wonder why the first budget was so inaccurate. in their role of oversight. the board may make inappropriate decisions based on faulty data. If Regina uses last period’s budget. Regina should submit the most current information she has. The relationship between the CEO and the board should be one of trust and confidence. if she submits a budget based on last year’s budget and she knows that this is likely to be inaccurate. and use last year’s budgets for departments that have not turned theirs in. This is a potential ethical dilemma for Regina because the Direct of Finance believes that he can rely on Regina’s work when he presents the budget to the board. and the Director of Finance will present the board with information that is unreliable. they will draw erroneous conclusions about the performance of the organization and the top management. Although the board is not directly involved in day-to-day operations. with a flag indicating that the information quality is low for the budgets in those departments and an explanation that the budget is currently based on last year’s information. such as machining work on units. . the board may begin to lose trust in the CEO’s ability to manage operations. 2. they need the most current information available and explanations for information that is not available.
wiley. number of hours the building is open. I would eliminate number of students because there does not seem to be a positive linear relationship between maintenance cost and number of students.000 $10. Costs $25.wiley.000 $5.000 $15.35 Brush Prairie High School The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2. A.000 $20. Dept. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. Students may have thought of other drivers that could be logically related to cleaning maintenance costs.000 $0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Maintenance Hours Worked Scatter Plot of Maintenance Costs Against Number of Students Maint.com/college/eldenburg). Dept. Costs $25. . or number of classes and activities per period.000 $15.com/college/eldenburg).000 $10.000 $0 528 530 532 534 536 538 540 542 Number of Students C.000 $20. number of hours students attend school. B. square feet cleaned.000 $5. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. Other cost drivers for total maintenance cost could be number of rooms cleaned. Scatter Plot of Maintenance Costs Against Number of Maintenance Hours Worked Maint.2-36 Cost Management 2.
03271 Standard Error 3019. The total cost function is: TC = $9.36 The Elder Clinic A and B Salaries are always fixed. Regression results for maintenance cost and number of maintenance hours worked: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. An unidentified cost driver could have a higher R-Square.173 Observations 12 Coefficient s -89867 197. The p-values on the Tstatistics are very small.807201 P-value 0.9 244.135 + $35. Utilities cost varies with season not visits.061172 Adjusted R Square -0. It cannot be known for certain whether the number of maintenance hours is the best cost driver because every single possible cost driver cannot be identified. maintenance hours is a reasonable cost driver. and rent for this type of facility is usually fixed.63E-06 2.508157 0.06772 Observations 12 Standard Error 965. it is rational to conclude that hours worked will provide a reasonable estimate of future costs.453062 P-value 2.5045837 4.18E-05 Regression output for maintenance cost and number of students: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.796328319 Intercept X Variable 1 Coefficients 9134. 2.74*maintenance hours worked.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-37 D. changes in maintenance hours worked explains more than 80% of the changes in maintenance cost while number of students explains none. From the analyses performed.438328 According to the R Square statistics.875134 35.0261 Standard Error 130954. it is considered fixed. E. providing high confidence that both the intercept and slope are different from zero.0857 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat -0. However.847440356 Adjusted R Square 0.920565237 R Square 0. Therefore. it is logical to expect a strong relation between hours worked and cost.74733262 t Stat 9.832184392 Standard Error 1217.68624 0. The most current value is used to .247329 R Square 0.461245 7.
2-38 Cost Management predict next period’s utilities. weather. July expenses are estimated to be: TC = $19. other facilities may open or close. There is no one answer to this part.58 $6. Medical supplies vary with number of patient-visits. These would be fixed. Some supplies. Use the same method for other expenses.wiley.412 1. Other expenses appear to increase and decrease with number of patientvisits.441. such as tongue depressors.736 + $6. the cost function is: TC = $19. Visits are affected by season. variable cost is $3. and so on. • Prices of all inputs could change (usually increase).736 Variable $3. such as snake anti-venom. each patient requires a certain number of supplies. Also.934)/(849 – 778). Sample solutions and a discussion of typical student responses will be included in assessment guidance on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. . Use March.49*849. At 940 patient-visits.736 + $6. to find fixed: $3.182 = F + $3.100 226 664 $19. Here are some of the reasons: • The managers will not know how many visits they will receive.07*patient-visits C. so this cost is classified as a mixed cost. This analysis suggests that there are some of the other expenses are variable costs and some fixed.07 Patient-visits X * The value in June is used for fixed costs because the increase in salaries will hold into the future. medical supplies is a mixed cost. These would be variable. high point of medical supplies cost and patient data. or there are changes in treatment procedures for certain illnesses. E. • Treatments and related costs may change as new drugs are available. Therefore. **Using high-low. and costs go up as patient-visits increase. and so on. affecting the number of visits at this clinic. must be kept on hand whether or not they are used.com/college/eldenburg). gloves. Given the preceding computations and cost summary. current illnesses that are circulating in the area.80 D.182 .115 219 3.$2. but not proportionately. new equipment is acquired. There are many possible reasons that could be listed.49 ($3.49 Cost Driver Patient-visits Mixed X 2.07*940 = $25. Category Medical staff salaries* Medical supplies used** Administrative salaries Rent Utilities Other expenses Total Expenses Fixed $14.
In some ways. Other costs are highly uncertain and subject to external factors that cannot be controlled. and D. Number of work stations might come from the department head. Information about number of employees and hours worked is found in the payroll accounting system. department heads. Accounting records could be accessed to determine the wage rates and time worked for help support staff and supervisors. number of work stations. analysis at the account level could be used to develop a cost function using information from the general ledger. supplies.38 Personal Cost Function A. prepaid insurance schedules. If enough data points are available. number of hours worked. Vendors. C. and others could be interviewed to identify any potential cost increases or other expected changes in cost behavior from prior periods. Some costs are discretionary. etc. number of employees.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-39 2. Number of calls might have to be tracked by employees or by the telephone system. The cost object is the help line.37 Cost function Judgment and Method A. could be used to identify costs for building and occupancy costs. E. a personal budget estimation problem is similar to the cost estimation problem for a business. Number of customers is part of the revenue accounting records. Regression analysis makes use of all data points and is more accurate than twopoint methods. The choice of information sources depends on how the past cost information is to be used. If not. or it might need to be estimated if it has not been tracked in the past. It would be useful to obtain several years of monthly data from which to prepare scatter plots and run regression analysis. . Some future costs can be estimated with high accuracy based on prior commitments (e. If the service is housed in a common building.g. and other miscellaneous costs. Alternatively. with representative points selected from a scatter plot. B. D. or total number of Internet customers. Possible cost drivers include number of calls handled. a two point method might be best. If the help line is housed in its own building. rent). This data could be found in the accounting system. cost allocation records could be used to identify past costs. C. regression analysis would probably be the best choice. 2. The answers to these questions depend on the individual student’s data and cost behavior. assuming a linear cost function. depreciation schedules.. Analysis of general ledger entries could be used to determine past costs for phone service. B.
750 . available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. No adjustments are needed for items (c) and (d). A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.236 69.800.2. A.686 71.750.486 68. Because of the large difference between these values and the values in other months. as shown in the scatter plot below. .500 x 1/2 = 2. Adjustments to more accurately reflect overhead costs incurred: Unadjusted Overhead Mar $68.8 x 6.790 80.736 67.000 + 500 + 500 + 500 + 500 + 500 Depreciation(b) +$36 1 + 36 -4.10. the first month is adjusted even though it is not an actual cost: 4.250 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov 1 Property Tax(a) +$500 + 500 + 500 + 500 -3.850 2 .310 70. Operations in the month of July are not typical of the rest of the time period. If these observations are included in the regression analysis.83/mo.200 +$2.596 73. B. 80% of September 2 payroll to August: .286 68.736 To predict future overhead.2-40 Cost Management 2.750 + 4. The miscellaneous supplies account also looks suspicious.39 Smeyer Industries The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.376 65.800 41. but there is insufficient information to make an adjustment.000 = 4. these are correctly handled.800 .300 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 Other Payroll3 Adjusted Cost $68.350 68.036 68. 1/2 of August 5 payroll goes to July: 5.wiley. July’s result is an outlier and should be removed from the data.300/10 x 12 = 35.com/college/eldenburg).150 73.com/college/eldenburg).4. the trend line is likely to distort costs.750 68. IP-14 3 Payroll paid every two weeks. Similarly.200 Apr 71.wiley. (rounded to $36) 2 Note IB-4's power added to Dept.500 38.
641981 0.000 $40.000 2. D.000 3.79 * direct labor hours This cost function might not provide a very accurate estimate for future costs because the direct labor hours explain only about 31% of the variation in overhead costs (based on the adjusted R-square).000 6.47 8 Standard Error 29406.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-41 Scatter Plot of Adjusted Overhead Costs Against Direct Labor Hours $75.314163 1980.000 $60.000 9. Based on the variation in dates at which supplies are recorded. Therefore. According to the details provided for August and September.310484 Intercept X Variable 1 Coefficient s 8777.500 8. the fixed cost does not appear to be different from zero.000 $55.086126 Based on the t-statistic and p-value for the intercept. they are most likely recorded at the time of purchase rather than at the time of use. the cost function is estimated as: Overhead cost = $6.412139 0. supplies were a large proportion of overhead cost.818 6.789722 t Stat 0.26 3.050976 P-value 0. Here are the regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.500 5. Monthly overhead costs for supplies may be significantly overstated or understated . Thus.775388 0.000 $45. considerable future variation in overhead costs is likely to occur due to factors other than changes in direct labor hours.000 Overhead Costs $70.000 $65.500 Outlier Direct Labor Hours C.000 $50.298502 2.
sometimes known changes have occurred in prices or cost behavior. but if the company would like information about predicted monthly costs. adjustments could be made to adjust the balance in supplies inventory each month. Additional adjustments include any expected changes in costs from prior periods. For example. Second. E. Following are three reasons for making adjustments when estimating cost functions. financial statements may be prepared less frequently than data is collected for cost estimation. The process of preparing financial statements often includes adjustments so that costs are recorded in the correct time period. power costs could be adjusted upward if utility rates in the future are expected to be higher than in the past. there could be seasonal variation in costs such as overtime pay and utilities. this may not be a problem. Third. In addition. However. the accounting records might not accurately reflect the costs incurred during each time period. First. If the cost function is for annual costs. Thus. . small adjustments that may be material when estimating a cost might not be sufficiently material to the financial statements for adjustments in the accounting records. these variations would need to be considered. Prior cost data should be adjusted for these changes before the data are used to estimate future costs.2-42 Cost Management if the amount of supplies inventory varies significantly from month to month.
4. b. 3. a cost function should distinguish between fixed and variable costs. . C. in Chapter 2 pointed out that a cost function is estimated within a relevant range of activity. whereas variable costs are often relevant. c. For example. how to categorize costs as fixed. it is necessary to use judgment when choosing and applying measurement methods. 2. the best choice of estimation technique. and they prevent complete accuracy in making accounting measurements. two-point method. Uncertainties prevent identification of single “correct” measurement methods. high-low method. which typically involved creating a cost function for one or more individual costs. A measurement is appropriate if it is suitable for the purpose. A measurement is relevant if the resulting cost function information helps decision makers choose between alternative courses of action. See Exhibit 2. A cost function estimated from past cost data may be unreliable if future operating activities are expected to occur in a different relevant range.40 Focus on Professional Competency: Measurement A. Suppose a cost function is measured for the purpose of estimating future costs. The costs and benefits of alternative measures should also be considered. A measurement is reliable if it if it is reasonably free from error and bias. Chapter 2 introduced the following measurement methods for estimating a cost function: Engineered estimate of cost.17 for the pros and cons of each method. relevant. whether past cost behaviors will continue in the future. sometimes the cost of obtaining a better measure exceeds the benefits. If the cost is believed to be nonlinear. variable or mixed. simple regression. B. and reliable measure for estimating a cost function because of uncertainties about: data availability. When estimating a cost function: a. 1. which factors drive variable costs. then simple regression is inappropriate. and multiple regression (Appendix 2A). In Chapter 2. Fixed costs are often irrelevant to decisions.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-43 BUILD YOUR PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES 2. A measurement method such as simple regression is appropriate if past cost patterns are expected to continue in the future and i the cost is linearly related to the cost driver. for example. For example. analysis at the account level. and how to interpret computational results. It is often difficult to identify an appropriate. Thus. the main focus was on measuring costs for a cost object. It is also necessary to evaluate the quality of measurement results when using accounting information.
the manager should be informed about key uncertainties or risks associated with using the cost function. students might think of others. and easy to understand. then it should probably describe all of the major decisions involved in developing the cost function. irrelevant. However. Here are some desirable characteristics of a report about an estimated cost function. Changing circumstances can change the patterns of cost behavior and cause an estimated cost function to be inappropriate. It is typically appropriate to use more technical language in reports written for other accountants than in reports written for non-accounting audiences. • The use of technical language should depend on the audience. • The report should focus on information that will be relevant to the user. However. If the user needs to make a decision quickly.2-44 Cost Management 5. • The desired quality of the report should be weighed against the timeliness of information for the user. If the report will be used by a manager who needs to estimate future costs. People who lack objectivity are likely to present biased information that impairs high quality decision making. then it may be more important to provide the cost function information rapidly than to prepare a high quality report. and/or unreliable. . the user should be informed about the priorities used in creating the report. then the details of the estimation process may be irrelevant. • The format should be concise. D. If the report will be presented to a superior within the accounting department. It is important to present the cost function information objectively to improve its relevance and reliability for the user. Note: Some of these ideas were adapted from the Path to Higher-Quality Management Decisions presented in Chapter 1 (Exhibit 1. clear. taking into account the knowledge and interests of the user.9).
using monthly data for the prior 4 years.678620854 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat 19.41 Integrating Across the Curriculum: Statistics [Note about problem complexity: This homework problem was written with adequate instructions so that students should be able to perform the various regression analyses that are called for.5917832 Standard Error 6216.6004687 Adjusted R Square 0.194 + $13. Here are the simple regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. the degree of downward bias is higher for older data than for more recent data.com/college/eldenburg).wiley.609693 1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-45 2. .848277 8. In prior years. B.wiley. students are likely to struggle interpreting and choosing a method (Parts E and F). The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $133.96 x number of chairs produced However. However. the prior labor costs are biased downward—future labor costs are expected to be higher than past labor costs. Also.7748991 R Square 0.3147402 P-value 3.437E-24 1. A.02E-10 Based on the regression results.957296 Standard Error 6710. the regression explains only about 59% of the variation in labor costs. Because of the annual pay increases.com/college/eldenburg).7995 Observations 48 Coefficient s 133194.04 13. the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit are each positive and statistically different from zero. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. the cost function was estimated by regressing actual labor costs on number of chairs produced.] The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2. Considerable variation in labor costs is not explained by changes in the volume of production.
this cost function would result in a higher estimate for future costs.05E-27 2.96 to $16.2-46 Cost Management C.57E-23 2.274 Using the adjusted labor cost data.492 1.26499 6.905 Observations 48 Coefficient s 133736 16.23439 Standard Error 5557.54295 Standard Error 5689. The fixed cost is nearly the same.347 Calculation $203. which is reasonable given the increase in wage rates over time.863839 Standard Error 3742.347 x 1. the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit are each positive and statistically different from zero.09577 6.311 200.891 1.00872 Intercept X Variable 1 X Variable 2 t Stat 18.91E-08 .010513 1.390275 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat 24. Also. Here are the multiple regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.864722 R Square 0.67711 P-value 1.06236 11.23 per chair.8 16.533 x (1. The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $133.533 Dec 20X4 196. Here are a couple of months’ data for double-checking the calculation of adjusted labor costs: Month Original Labor Cost Jan 20X1 $203.74). but the variable cost increased from $13.747745 Adjusted R Square 0.02 Adjusted Labor Cost $220.02)4 $196. here are the regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.411 Observations 48 Coefficient s 107748.73E-20 5.93821 16. Nevertheless.35E-15 Based on the regression results.742261 Standard Error 5148.486389 P-value 4. D.736 + $16. approximately 26% of the variation in labor costs is still unexplained.932541 R Square 0.23 x number of chairs produced This regression provides a more reasonable cost function than the previous version because it explains a higher proportion of the variation in labor costs (adjusted R-square of 0.869633 Adjusted R Square 0.
Conversely. the two cost drivers together explain a very high proportion (86%) of the variation in past labor costs. the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit for each cost driver are all positive and statistically different from zero.26) is interpreted in a straight-forward way. then this month’s labor costs will reflect a lower level of labor cost. As explained in the problem. The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $107. and to decrease the number of workers when production volumes decrease. then this month’s labor costs will reflect the higher level of labor cost. if the prior month’s production was lower than this month’s production. each month’s labor costs are expected to increase by $16.749 + $16. The first slope coefficient ($16. If the prior month’s production was higher than this month’s production. Thus. On one hand.26 x current month number of chairs produced + $6. each month’s labor costs are expected to increase by $6. F. it could be argued that some other cost driver might do a better job of predicting future labor costs. it appears that both independent variables should be included in the cost function because they both have a logical cause-and-effect relationship with labor costs.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-47 Based on the regression results.l6 for each chair produced during the month. However. The second slope coefficient requires more thought. E. the company’s policy is to increase the number of workers when production volumes increase. it often takes time for the company to hire qualified new workers. There is no one single answer to this question. and the managers often delay laying off employees when volumes decline.54 x prior month number of chairs produced The statistics suggest that this is a more reasonable cost function than the previous version because all coefficients are positive statistically different from zero. there may be some lag between the time that production volumes change and labor costs change. On the other hand. . and this regression explains more of the variation in labor costs (86%). and they both have positive and statistically significant coefficients.54 for each chair produced during the prior month. According to the multiple regression results. In addition.