This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Chapter 2 addresses the following questions: Q1 What are different ways to describe cost behavior? Q2 What is a learning curve? Q3 What process is used to estimate future costs? Q4 How are the engineered estimate, account analysis, and two-point methods used to estimate cost functions? Q5 How does a scatter plot assist with categorizing a cost? Q6 How is regression analysis used to estimate a mixed cost function? Q7 What are the uses and limitations of future cost estimates? These learning questions (Q1 through Q7) are cross-referenced in the textbook to individual exercises and problems.
The textbook uses a coding system to identify the complexity of individual requirements in the exercises and problems. Questions Having a Single Correct Answer: No Symbol This question requires students to recall or apply knowledge as shown in the textbook. This question requires students to extend knowledge beyond the applications e shown in the textbook. Open-ended questions are coded according to the skills described in Steps for Better Thinking (Exhibit 1.10): Step 1 skills (Identifying) Step 2 skills (Exploring) Step 3 skills (Prioritizing) Step 4 skills (Envisioning)
2.1 This function has both fixed costs and variable costs. If at least part of the cost is variable; total cost increases as production volumes increase. If at least part of the cost is fixed, the average total per-unit cost decreases because the average fixed cost decreases as volume increases.
Q 2.2 Several years’ worth of data for August would be helpful for estimating the overhead cost function for subsequent Augusts, but the August data should not be used for estimating the overhead cost function for other months during the year. It is highly unlikely that the August data would be representative of the data during normal operations. However, August’s costs are probably a good estimate of the fixed costs for other months. When zero production occurs, only fixed costs are incurred. Since time appears to be of the essence, one of several cost estimation techniques might be employed. First, account analysis will provide a rough estimate. Second, the two most recent income statements could be used to approximate fixed and variable costs using the two-point method, but the president would need to understand that the quality of information could be low using this method. Third, if enough observations of cost data are readily available, regression analysis can be run. However, usually it takes more time to collect the data necessary to use regression analysis. The information leads to a conclusion that fixed costs exist because cost per unit changes between two levels of activity within the relevant range. The information is not sufficient to determine the amount of fixed costs or whether variable costs exist. The opportunities foregone could include spectator or participative sports activities, movies, going out to dinner, the opportunity to work at a part-time job, etc. The relevant cash flows include the cost of transportation, parking, tickets, food and beverages, and so on. There is no way to assign a quantitative value to the social experiences. It is difficult to identify a true opportunity cost because the costs and benefits of the next best alternative must be compared. However, lost wages, less the cost of transportation, can be quantified if the next if the next best alternative is working. Analysis of a scatter plot provided general information about whether a cost appears to be variable, fixed, or mixed. If there is a linear pattern in the scatter plot and the trend appears to go to zero, the cost could be variable. If a scatter plot with a linear trend intersects the vertical axis at a nonzero value, it could be mixed. If the scatter plot has no discernable pattern, the cost could be fixed. And if the pattern is linear with little or no slope, the cost could be fixed.
Chapter 2: The Cost Function
The pattern of a cost over time in the accounting system, together with knowledge of operations, is used to classify costs as variable, fixed, or mixed. Costs such as managers' salaries are usually fixed; they are often directly associated in the general ledger with a particular department or product. Costs for variable materials used in the production process are usually available in the general ledger or in production records. Costs such as manufacturing overhead are often mixed; they tend to include fixed costs such as insurance and property taxes for the plant and variable costs such as indirect supplies used in manufacturing. For costs identified as mixed, another cost estimation technique such as the two-point method or regression analysis must be used to determine the fixed and variable components. Learning curves are nonlinear representations of direct labor cost. The cumulative average time approach can be used to determine an approximation of total cost when labor experiences a learning rate. Economies of scale are a nonlinear function. Information about past experience with economies of scale can be used to help estimate future costs. For example, volume discounts are examples of economies of scale. The required volumes needed to reach discounted prices are generally known, so these can be estimated using several different ranges to reflect the changes in price. The cumulative average learning-time approach is a quantitative approach to calculating the average amount of time it should take to perform a task for people who are just learning to do the task. The director can use this formula to more accurately predict the amount of time it should take to deliver meals to the elderly. With a more accurate prediction, the volunteers’ schedules should also more accurately reflect the amount of time they need to set aside for their work at Meals on Wheels. The trend line developed using regression analysis incorporates all of the cost observations, while the two-point method uses only two observations. Because there is fluctuation in cost over time, better estimates are developed using more observations, because they better reflect the past fluctuations and therefore should better estimate future fluctuations.
2.11 Computer Manufacturer A. Production of a large monitor with a thin flat screen B. If all of the parts for the monitor are currently used in the organization, all of the information is likely to be contained in the accounting records. But new parts are most likely needed, since the monitor is large and probably involves different technology to achieve thin size. Thus, estimates of costs from suppliers will be needed. In addition, estimates for the amount of labor time will be needed. Although labor cost per hour can be found in the records, the amount of labor time is likely to be different for this monitor than for other monitors. If machines are used in production, an estimation of machine hours is necessary to determine whether maintenance and repair costs will increase. C. Estimating the cost of parts and the time involved in production is part of the engineered estimate of cost method. D. The opportunity cost of using idle capacity for one product is the contribution of other uses of the capacity. If another product could be manufactured and sold, that product’s contribution margin is the opportunity cost. If the capacity can be rented or leased out, the rent or lease payments are the opportunity cost. If there are no other uses for the capacity, the opportunity cost is zero. 2.12 Frida’s Tax Practice Cost Object Cost Subscription to personal tax law updates publication Ink supplies for tax department photocopy machine Portion of total rent for tax department office space Wages for tax department administrative assistant Tax partner's salary Charges for long distance call to Mr. Gruper about personal tax return questions Tax partner lunch with Mr. Gruper; the tax partner has lunch with each client at least once per year
Tax Department Personal Returns Mr. Gruper’s Personal Tax Return
A. B. C. D. E. F. G.
D D I D D D D
D I I I I D D
I I I I I D D
the tax partner probably spends some time in non-billable activities.000 $11. For the firm to make this cost direct for the personal returns cost object. Stepwise Linear.00*Q Graph of Cost Function $14. TC = $10. Of course. CPAs do keep detailed time records.000 + $8. and Piecewise Linear Cost Functions A.000 $13. The benefits of tracking the cost at that level do not exceed the benefits of the information that would be obtained. Now notice that the tax partner's salary is considered a direct cost for all three cost objects.000 Total Cost $12.000 $9.13 Linear. the administrative assistant would have to maintain detailed time records as to time spent working on personal returns versus corporate returns. The time records that the tax partner maintains support this cost as a direct cost.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-5 Explanation for Parts D and E: Notice that the wages of the tax department administrative assistant are considered a direct cost when the cost object is the entire tax department but are considered indirect for the other two cost objects. so a portion of his or her salary is direct only to the tax department and indirect to the two other cost objects. In a service business such as this. 2.000 $10.000 $8.000 0 100 200 Number of Units 300 400 The cost function includes the following assumptions: • Operations are within a relevant range of activity • Within the relevant range of activity: o Fixed costs will remain fixed o Variable cost per unit will remain constant . the CPA's time is the product being sold.
000 4.000 units = 10.000 $10.$450.000 * $44 = $528.000 = F + $39*10.000) = $78.000 $70.000)/(12.000 $60.000 + $8.000 = $60.000 F = $450.000 3.000 $0 0 1.000 Total cost at 12. To estimate the costs at another production level. Convert the average costs to total costs for each production level: Total cost at 10. for Q ≤ 2.000 .00*Q. for Q > 2.000 + $8.000 units = 12.000 TC = $35.000 Calculate the variable cost per unit using the Two-Point method: Change in cost Change in volume = ($528.000 .000 – 10.000 $30.00*Q.$390.000 2.000 units: $450.000 Total Cost $50.000 * $45 = $450.2-6 Cost Management B.000 Combining the fixed and variable costs to create the cost function: TC = $60.000 + $39*Q .000 Graph of Cost Function $80.000 $40.000 $20.000 Number of Units C.000/2.000 = $39 per unit Use one data point in the total cost function and solve for F: Using the data for 10. TC = $25. it is first necessary to estimate the cost function.
14 Piecewise Linear Cost Function A.00) + $9.000 Estimated cost per unit = $645.00*Q 2-7 Graph of Cost Function $75.000 TC = $51.000: TC = $50.00*Q .000 0 500 1.Chapter 2: The Cost Function Estimated total cost at 15. TC = $50.000/15.000 + $10.000 = $9.00*(Q-1.000 1.000 = $43 D.000 + $9. for Q < 1.000) TC = $50.000 + (1.000 Number of Units Slope is $10 per unit Slope is $9 per unit Total Cost .000 + 45%*$10.000 $50.000 $60.$9.000 $45.000 $55.000 in revenues into the cost function.000 $65.000 * $10.000 + $39*15.500 2.000 $70.000 + $585.000 units: TC = $60.000 + $9.000 = $645.00*Q. total cost is estimated as: TC = $5.000 + $10.500 2.000 For Q > 1. Inserting $10.000 = $60.
000 units. If all of the data estimation points occurred when Q was ≤ 1. If the accountant did not detect that there were two different relevant ranges. If the data estimation points occurred across the two relevant ranges. This cost function would provide reasonable estimates for Q ≤ 1. 2.000 + $10.00*Q.000 + $9. Graph of Learning Curve Cumulative Average Hours Per Return 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 Cumulative Number of Returns Prepared . If all of the data estimation points occurred when Q was > 1.2-8 Cost Management B.3219 Y = 6 hours*2-0. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr Learning rate = 80% α = 6 hours X (units produced) = 2 Learning rate = (ln 0.000 units but would underestimate total cost for Q ≤ 1. This cost function would provide reasonable estimates for Q > 1.3 and 2A.8 hours (average time for each of the next two returns) B.4. This cost function will either overestimate or underestimate costs for almost any level of Q (see Exhibit 2A. 3.000 units.15 Tax Plus A.80/ln2) = −0. Hours for two returns would be determined as follows. There are three general situations: 1. 2.00*Q. then the cost function would appear to be: TC = $50.000 units.3219 Y = 4.000 units but would overestimate total cost for Q > 1. then the cost function would be some mixture of the functions for the two relevant ranges. the cost function mismeasurement depends on the values of Q. then the cost function would appear to be: TC = $51.000 units.
their productivity increases. then wages would be an indirect cost. Note: Depreciation using a method such as declining balance is not constant over time. V C. and their productivity rate will remain stable. D.000 on total sales of $32. Assuming that the cost of clay can be traced to each bowl. Eventually their learning will plateau. wages are a direct cost. this particular cost function assumes that variable costs are driven by sales.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-9 As the accounting graduates become more familiar with the tasks involved in preparing simple tax returns. the cost function is: TC = $20. but would still be considered fixed because it does not vary with production volume. The cost probably does not depend on production volume (assuming depreciation is not based on units produced). if the employee performs different types of tasks and records are not kept of the types of work performed) or if the employee does not work directly in production. making it a fixed cost. that is.000 + 25%*Total sales B. Chapter 3 will point out another assumption for this cost function: the sales mix (the proportion of sales of different products) remains constant within the relevant range.000 = 0.000. B.16 Bison Sandwiches A. 2. it improves less quickly for the next return. Depreciation on the kilns is indirect because it cannot be directly traced to individual bowls. In addition. Wages are fixed because they remain constant (the employee always works 40 hours). D or I. F Assuming that employee time can be traced to each bowl. However. if time is not traced to individual bowls (for example. 2.25.] A.17 Glazed Over [Note about problem complexity: Items F and H are coded as “Extend” because judgment is needed for categorization. F . or 25% of sales Combining fixed and variable costs. Total clay cost will vary with the number of bowls made.000/$32. If total variable costs were $8. it is a common cost of production for all of the bowls that are heat-treated in the kiln. and variable costs remain constant within the relevant range. as their performance improves. then variable cost per dollar of revenue is calculated as follows: $8. I. it is a direct cost. However. Assumptions: Fixed costs remain fixed within the relevant range.
part of the cost might vary proportionately with volume.500 ______ $4.000 2. making it an indirect cost. so it is treated as fixed.2-10 Cost Management D. because the production area may need more cleaning as volumes increase. D or I. If the kiln is electric.18 Yummy Yogurt [Note about problem complexity: Item A is coded as “Extend” because judgment is needed for categorization. This cost is also discretionary. If the cost of glaze is very small. G.300 $3. if the cost is small it might be grouped with overhead costs (variable). If it is an hourly charge. it is probably a mixed cost. depending on whether they are “used up” after a certain quantity of production. it might not be traced to individual bowls. I. D or I. I. E. V If the glaze is expensive and therefore a relatively large cost. making it a fixed cost. Packing costs are most likely variable because they will increase as production increases. If the packing materials are not traced (for example. It is mostly likely a flat fee or is calculated on a basis unrelated to production volume. They might be fixed or variable. J. depending on what causes the cost to vary. F I. making them a common cost for multiple units and an indirect cost. 2. H. this is a direct cost. it is most likely traced to individual bowls. Also. I. V Assuming that the cost of packing materials is traced to each bowl. Fixed Cost of ingredients Rent Store attendant (salaried) Total Costs at $9. I. F The business license is not related to production. V or F Brushes for the glaze are most likely used for multiple bowls.000 in sales $1. F. F or M Pottery studio maintenance is an indirect and fixed cost if it is the same payment every week. making it a direct and variable cost. F or M Electricity is an indirect cost because it cannot be traced to individual bowls.] A. making it an indirect cost.500 . then this cost could be indirect. It might be fixed or mixed.300 Variable $4. if the cost is too small to justify tracing them). I. making it an indirect cost. Advertising is not directly related to production.
In this type of situation. The opportunity cost is the contribution margin from the products sold with the flavor that has been replaced. these costs would be mixed with a large proportion of the cost fixed. Hourly wages on the fishing boat most likely vary with the number of days or hours the boat is out fishing. D. . FB. In the fishing boat business. Therefore. or 50% of revenue Combining fixed and variable costs. B. F or M Employee benefits occur in any business in which employees are hired. In the pizza shop.000 = 0.] A.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-11 B. costs vary with dollars of revenue. so they would tend to be fixed or mixed (see Item A above). B. C. or M There would most likely be hourly wages in both types of businesses (assuming employees are hired). While hourly wages may be related to number of fish caught. the cost function is: TC = $3. because of uncertainty in the success of each fishing expedition. and G are coded as “Extend” because they require substantial business knowledge and/or ability to visualize cost behavior. employees are likely scheduled in advance on a fixed schedule.19 Pizza Shop and Fishing Boat [Note about problem complexity: Items C. workers’ compensation. PS. and unemployment insurance. Benefits might include mandated items such as social security. as well as voluntary items such as health insurance and retirement benefits.300 + 50%*Total revenue C. B. In many organizations. There most likely would not be any ingredients in a fishing boat business. D. total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) can be used in the cost function: Total variable cost/Total revenue = $4. 2.500/$9. E. this cost would most likely be fixed because the cost would not vary within a relevant range of activity. they are more likely related to time on the boat than pounds of fish. V. F There would be no reason to incur fishing equipment costs in a pizza business. and the cost would vary with number of pizzas produced. Benefit costs often vary with level of wages or salaries.50. The cost of rent is irrelevant because it will not change with either alternative. F. F. V Ingredients are used in making pizzas. Some may be sent home if business is very slow.
1075 0. In general.1619 10. advertising costs would be incurred.0148 0.2-12 Cost Management E. they are treated as fixed costs.000) * 4] 0. G. Mustard ($.$0. B.29/12) 0.20 Hamburger Haven Following are calculations for the cost per unit of each ingredient and the cost of plan and cheeseburgers: Cheeseburger Cost per Unit Plain With Everything 1. For the fishing boat business. but it might be mixed if a portion of the cost relates to levels of business activity. Hamburger bun ($1.95/2.0198 9. Onions ($.2414 $0.3489 (calculated above) B.0179 4.0233 7.0179 0. It will be a fixed cost if it is a flat amount. there might be some utility costs for the fishing operation and for a business office.99/50) 0.0053 8. Dill pickles [($8.5195 = $1.0053 0. depending on how the insurance cost is calculated. and yellow pages advertisements.0148 6.0033 $0.5196 Suggested selling price: 300% * $0.0233 0. the utility costs for these two businesses would tend to be fixed (would not vary with production). newspaper advertisements. Mayonnaise [$1. 2. If the fishing boat is for tourists.1075 3.15/45) 0. F.59/16) 0.1619) = $0.1075 0.0863 0. Lettuce ($.0863 5.56 .49/(16 x 4)] 0.59/40) 0.0033 0. Cheese ($2. although the cost would probably be much higher for the pizza business because of the utilities needed to run the pizza shop.3489 $0.6815 A. Catsup ($.69/8) 0. Because advertising costs tend to be discretionary.1619 0. Tomato ($.2414 2. Cost of burger with everything except cheese = ($0. Hamburger patty ($1.69/7) $0.0198 0. Cost of plain burger = $0.79/150) 0.6815 . F Most pizza shops incur advertising costs such as flyers. F Some type of utility costs (such as water and electricity) would be incurred in both types of business. The cost might be fixed or mixed.2414 $0. F or M Any type of business will have insurance costs. however it would be unusual for a commercial fishing boat business to incur advertising costs because the customers are most likely canneries and distributors with whom the fishermen have an ongoing relationship. PS. B.
6815 = $2. if her prices are too low. Licenses. D. 2.] A. and F) are the ones requiring significant assumptions to generate an answer. If there is part time help. there is no moral obligation to maintain a 300% markup on each item. Rent . most organizations are price takers.21 Spencer and Church [Note about problem complexity: These are difficult questions because students will need to first visualize the costs (with very little information) and then apply chapter concepts.04 .Mostly fixed and discretionary H. In the current business environment. Insurance. Staff wages – Could be variable or mixed (salary + overtime) for regular staff. that cost would be variable.79 Some students will view this higher price as "unfair.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-13 C. if Ms. The Step 2 questions (A. volumes will drop because customers will go to other fast food restaurants that sell hamburgers. Office supplies . in which case the total cost would be primarily fixed. Therefore. Alternatively. Market forces will dictate achievable prices. they set prices considering their competitors’ prices.Fixed E.04 Therefore. Alternatively.25 = $1. If Ms. she needs to know what competitors charge for a similar quality sandwich and price hers competitively.Fixed D.Fixed . FICA taxes (Social Security taxes) – Mixed – mostly fixed because most employee wages would be fixed J. she foregoes profits and people may believe there could be quality problems with her food. mostly variable G. Long’s prices are too high. that is. However staff are often salaried. Selling price of cheeseburger with everything: 300% * $0.Fixed F." However.Fixed and discretionary I. Clerical wages – Fixed unless overtime is regularly scheduled. B.$0. Professional dues. This means that her costs need to be below the competitive price. Property taxes. then she may be able to charge a price that is higher than competitors—as long as customers are willing to pay the higher price. Long is able to differentiate her hamburgers from others in the market. and then mixed C. the price of the plain hamburger should be: $2. Professional subscriptions. It is just a general guideline.Mixed. B.
In addition.35*units sold. Advertising – Fixed and discretionary 2. If this is the case.2-14 Cost Management K. For example. TC = $222. 2. The cost analyst needs to gather information about how marketing costs are set each year.22 Cost Function Using Regression. the cost is discretionary and will be set through the negotiating process. Therefore.23 Central Industries [Note about problem complexity: Item B is not coded as Step 1 because it is fairly clear which cost driver appears to be best. . C. Other possible cost drivers for marketing department costs could be revenue. the analyst could ask the CFO whether the marketing department budgets its costs through a negotiation process with top management.] The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.wiley.com/college/eldenburg). number of advertisements placed. In this problem.) B. or profits.wiley.com/college/eldenburg). A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. the fixed cost is set at zero. (Notice that the T-statistics on the fixed costs indicate that it is not likely to be different from zero. Other Potential Cost Drivers A. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. The adjusted R-Square indicates how much of the variation in the marketing department cost can be explained by variation in units sold. the variation in units sold explains about 61% of the variation in marketing department cost. it is possible that marketing costs are discretionary.
Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-15 A.000514 .000 $1.761602 4.4342166 0.58E-05 0.119724 15 Coefficient s 884.61765897 0.52099624 Standard Error 153.113687834 Intercept Output t Stat 5.582691 P-value 6.78591283 0.000 $500 $0 0 500 1000 Output 1500 2000 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.500 $1.026826 0.58824812 182. Potential Cost Driver: Output Maintenance Costs Against Output $2.500 Maintenance Costs $2.
717372 P-value 0.02569657 Standard Error 261.31319046 235.000 $1.005847 0.500 Maintenance Costs $2.113464425 Intercept Direct Labor Hours t Stat 3.2-16 Cost Management Potential Cost Driver: Direct Labor Hours Maintenance Costs Against Direct Labor Hours $2.291084 2.000 $500 $0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Direct Labor Hours Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.7549386 1.500 $1.210849 15 Coefficient s 861.457384 3.017601 .60187065 0.36224828 0.
500 Maintenance Costs $2.815737 29. a good cost driver would present a linear or football-shaped positive slope or trend. all three potential cost drivers appear to be positively related to maintenance costs. In Part A.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-17 Potential Cost Driver: Machine Setups Maintenance Costs Against Machine Set-Ups $2. This indicates that the cost could be totally variable. .42597461 1.500 $1. machine setups appears to be the most likely cost driver and direct labor appears to be the least likely cost driver.000 $1.6778973 0.97410583 0.357393 15. For example. Sometimes a cost that is mostly variable can be identified from a scatter plot.94495003 66. the trend line for machine setups looks as if the intercept could be zero or very close to zero. the cost driver does not explain the variation in cost and either it is the wrong driver.197755 8. or the cost is mostly fixed. However. If the observations are widely scattered. In a scatter plot.5913391 15 Standard Error 93.96E-10 B.5343 P-value 0.94888217 0.910475729 Intercept Machine Setups t Stat 1.000 $500 $0 0 20 40 Machine Set-Ups 60 80 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations Coefficient s 126.
945 Cost Function TC = $884 + $0. so it is excluded from the cost function.588 0. E. This means that variation in setups explains about 95% of the variation in cost. This provides confidence that the variable cost part of the cost function is not zero. The regression using machine setups has the highest adjusted R-Square of 0.945.68* Machine Setups The machine setups intercept coefficient is not significant. . the t-statistic is significant for the independent variable but not for the intercept. business processes. D. R-Square 0. The regression results and cost function for the three potential cost drivers are: Potential Cost Driver Output Direct labor hours Machine setups Adj. Therefore. The use of past cost data to predict the future assumes that future resource costs and volumes of activities will remain the same as in the past.521*Output TC = $861 +$3. In the machine setups regression. the cost is likely to be totally variable.025*Direct Labor Hours TC = $29.2-18 Cost Management C. but does not provide confidence that the intercept (fixed cost) part of the cost function is different from zero. and technology can cause future costs to be different than estimated. the economic environment. Changes in many factors such as resource prices.313 0.
on average.24 Big Jack Burgers A.132.000 = 0. Total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) in the cost function because sales is a potential cost driver. . not represent the cost most of the time. this cost function might provide poor estimates of future costs.728 + 5%*Sales B. Therefore.000/$500. That means that the cost function might not represent the actual cost.333 = F + 5%*$1.100 – $632.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-19 PROBLEMS 2. the cost function is calculated using the highest and lowest values of the cost driver.$56. The high low method uses the most extreme cost driver values. Under the high-low method. that is. First. which could be outliers.728 Thus.333 – $43.100 F = $68.100) = $25.333)/($1.605 = $11.05. the total cost function is: TC = $11.132. or 5% of sales The fixed cost is determined by substituting the variable cost into one of the high-low data points: $68. the variable cost is calculated: ($68.333 .
000 $1.000 $0 $0 $300. Analysis at the account level can be used to increase the understanding of this cost.000 $600. there is a 16% probability that the intercept (fixed cost) is not different from zero. In that case. the cost function would be TC = $16. If this cost pool includes items such as salaries and other fixed costs (insurance.000 $40.5% x sales. the regression intercept can be used as an estimate of the fixed costs.000 Administrative Costs $60. Based on the p-value. Because this regression has few observations.000 $900.172. A t-statistic greater than 2 is often interpreted as meaning that the coefficient is significantly different from zero. D. fixed costs are likely to be zero and would be excluded from the cost function. There is a general downward slope (variable cost) that appears to meet the intercept enough above zero to suggest a fixed cost.200. the p-value result for the tstatistic is atypical. the cost function would be: TC = 4. etc). The upward slope of the line indicates that there are variable costs. trend line extended to Y-axis (dashed line) using Word: Scatter Plot With Trend Line $80. Additional judgment is required to decide whether it is appropriate to include a fixed cost in the cost function. but the p-value is greater than 10% at 0.2-20 Cost Management C. Notice that the t-statistic for the intercept coefficient is 2. analysis at the account level might indicate that there are few fixed costs. Chart of data with trend line added by Excel.5% x sales .000 $20.162. Following is the regression output.800 + 4.000 Sales It appears that the cost is most likely mixed. Alternatively. Then. Then.
There might be a change in business operations or in the economy that would cause future costs to be different than in the past. causing fluctuations in cost that are unrelated to any cost driver. the cost function is: TC = $50. F.82%*Sales C.9680477 0.93711636 0. There might be a large discretionary component in administrative costs. . In addition. This means that variation in sales explains only about 18% of the variation in research and development cost. Unusual cost items are assumed to continue in the future. on average. the high-low method may be the best option available. regression analysis incorporates all of the observations into the analysis. If there are only two or three data points.4038 4 Coefficients Standard Error 16800. Sales might not be the activity that drives administrative costs.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-21 Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0. Sales does not appear to explain much of the variation in research and development costs. Using the regression results. Future costs are not likely to be estimated accurately if the cost driver explains only a small part of the variation in the cost. If these assumptions do not hold.25 Scatter Plot. there does appear to be a general upward trend. However.16197623 0.186. If there are more data points. Cost Function Using Regression A.45937486 P-value 0. the results rely on more complete information and provide a better estimate. This method can be used in cases where there is not enough data to perform regression. however. Because of unforeseen changes in cost behavior.00818212 t Stat 2. The plot shows costs that are widely scattered.2444 7734. both of these methods assume that the data points are representative of future costs.365 + 0.90567454 3293. B. and possible changes in costs such as those described in Part E are ignored. a cost function may not provide a good estimate for the next month’s costs. Therefore. and it can be further improved by adopting more representative data points than the highest and lowest values of the cost driver.04466925 0. then both methods may be unsuitable for estimating future costs. 2. especially because so few observations were used in the estimation. The cons of the high-low method as an estimation technique were discussed in Part B above. The adjusted R-Square statistic is very low at 0. The past costs used for estimation might not be representative.0319523 Intercept X Variable 1 E.73545 0.17205158 5. Both methods assume that the cost function is linear and that all data points come from a single relevant range.
the number of calls and whether they are long distance or local calls will vary. G. fixed costs would remain fixed and variable costs would remain constant within that range. In addition.26 Susan’s Telephone Service A. the cost is assumed to be linear within the relevant range. F. assuming that the cost function is linear may not be appropriate. Managers set the costs depending on the organization’s strategies and funds available for research and development. so she does not need to estimate the cost function using regression or any other estimation technique. C. The scatter plot shows little evidence of linearity. Since she probably can cut back on calls when her consulting work is not providing enough income. Regression is useful for estimating a cost function when fixed and variable costs are unknown. the cost of alternatives such as cellular service or any other types of telephone or communication service. 2. part of the cost is committed and cannot be reduced. In this problem. She cannot be certain that she will use the same amount of time. D. Several very general assumptions apply to a linear cost function. the amount of traveling she will be doing since she cannot call from home when she is traveling. the relation makes sense from an economic standpoint. to make a decision she needs to compare her costs under the old plan to what costs would be under the new plan. H. Better cost estimates for discretionary costs can be obtained by gathering information about planned expenditures from the department head or from the managers who are responsible for costs. These costs are set by decision. the underlying cost function is assumed to be linear and that the cost driver is assumed to be economically plausible as a cost driver. It also depends on whether she can trace telephone calls to individual . that is.2-22 Cost Management D. The fixed cost is the $20 flat fee. Since she has to have telephone service to stay in business. usually annually. E. In this problem. research and development cost is often discretionary. The variable cost is 10 cents per minute for those minutes over 500 per month. It is likely that Susan has to call people to conduct business. Susan already knows the cost function. Therefore. on average. although she could use email. a portion of the cost is likely to be discretionary. First. The cost driver for long distance calls is the number of minutes on the telephone. Since her consulting work varies. as she has in the past. B. Yes. Additional information could include the location of Susan’s future consulting work. The classification as direct or indirect depends on whether Susan’s calls are directly related to specific projects she works on or are indirect activities such as business promotion. When regression analysis is used to specify a cost function.
Pros: • Susan might prefer the convenience of not switching telephone companies • If Susan is happy with her current quality of service she might prefer to stay with the same company and not investigate other companies’ plans • Susan may be able to predict her cost better. which appears to be the other alternative (although the 5 cents per minute rate might not be available for daytime week day calls).00 $20.067 $0. If her calls are over 400 minutes or under 600 minutes. especially if she usually calls less than 500 minutes a month • Below is Susan’s average cost per minute at different levels of calls per month. There are many different reasons that the time could be different from the amount determined above.00 Average Cost $0.05 $0. her phone bill will be less than it would be at a rate 5 cents per minute. In most businesses. students may think of others.152 Y = 8. telephone costs are viewed as an indirect cost.04 $0.1 hours (average time for the first four batches) B. Minutes 300 400 500 600 700 Total Cost $20.00 $20. she may be paying for 500 minutes of service that she does not use • If Susan’s calling volume exceeds 500 minutes per month.05 $0. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr α = 10 hours X (units produced) = 4 Learning rate = (ln 0.00 $20.00 + (600-500)*$0. I.10 = $40.27 Fancy Furniture A.00 + (700-500)*$0.10 = $30.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-23 consulting jobs. Many cellular telephone bills do not list the calls made.90/ln2) = −0. Hours per batch would be determined as follows. Cons • If Susan has a number of projects in her local area or will be traveling a lot.057 The average cost is lowest at exactly 500 minutes per month.152 Y = 10 hours*4-0.or overestimated the amount of hand work performed. In this case the learning rate would be wrong and so the time would also be wrong.00 $20. It is possible that the managers under. Here are some of the reasons. In . so Susan may need to maintain her own records if she wishes to trace telephone usage. she will pay a very high rate of 10 cents per minute 2.
and the University surcharge is specifically based on sales. C.000 Profit = Revenues – Total costs = $80.$79.000 Total revenue is the most likely cost driver for both variable costs. or 40% or revenue Combining fixed and variable costs. if managers believe that 25% of the work is done by hand. The observations of labor costs over the first few weeks would not be representative of the labor costs once productivity has stabilized. or has a great deal of experience on the machine. total revenue (TR) instead of quantity (Q) can be used in the cost function: Variable cost = $28.000 .000 Variable $21. The estimate of total costs given revenues of $80.2-24 Cost Management addition.000 7.28 Wildcat Lair A. then the chart suggests that the learning rate estimate is reasonable. the rate will change if the replacement employee has never worked on this machine. the cost function is: TC = $47. If these values are used in a regression to estimate a cost function. Because revenue is the cost driver for both variable costs.500 $47.000/$70. it is possible that different types of wood affect the rate at which chairs can be produced. Food costs are likely to vary proportionately with sales.40.000 = $1. However. they would be higher than the labor costs in later periods.000 using the cost function is: TC = $47.000 = 0. 2.000 5.000 + 40%*80. D. Wildcat Lair costs: Purchases of prepared food Serving personnel Cashier Administration University surcharge Utilities Totals Fixed $ 30. Thus. and B.500 10. if managers believe that more than 25% of the work is done by hand. then the cost would be overestimated. The chart suggests that a 90% learning curve is likely to occur if 25% of the work is hand assembly and 75% of the work is done by machine. C.000 + 40%*Total revenue D.000 1. If a worker is absent one day. then this chart suggests that the learning curve will be slower than the 90% estimate.000 _______ $28.000 = $79.000 .
the shop might experience very little business activity. it might even close when the ski area shuts down. In a retail business. Item D will be VERY difficult for most students.000 ($10. costs would be higher when there were fewer sales.000+$6. Because the university surcharge is an allocation within the university.000*40%).000). C. Assuming the highest electricity cost is during the winter when fewest bathing suits are sold.000)+the university surcharge of $7.000 (-$5.) The adjusted cost function is: TC = $47.000— the operating loss of $(5. F. the additional profit from a $10.000 (47. The shop is most likely a seasonal business. Variable food costs are estimated to be 30% ($21. and the increase is estimated to be 40% of the increase in revenues. So. A shop located near a ski area is likely to incur high heating costs during the winter. However. so the trend would be the opposite of this plot. the variable cost part of the cost function can be adjusted. So.000 .000.$4. If the university were to close the Lair. but this is not considered a cost driver (a business activity that causes variations in total variable cost).000.000) Net 2.000 ($10. (This is the same as the previous 40% variable cost rate less the university surcharge of 10% of revenues. During the spring and summer months. if the bathing suit shop is located in a geographic region $80.000 increase in revenues is expected to be $6. Lair’s fixed costs are assumed to be unchanged with the $10.000) (24. less the fixed costs and the variable food costs. so the estimated profit in August is $1. this surcharge should be ignored when computing the university’s opportunity cost (assuming that the charge does not relate to any variable costs for the university that arise because of the Lair). generating most its sales around the ski season (fall and winter).000 + 30%*Total revenue During August.000) $ 9.] A. To estimate the opportunity cost for August. Electricity costs also vary with changes in electricity rates.000 increase in revenues.000 .000/$70.000). Only total variable costs are expected to increase. B. total variable costs are expected to increase by $4. the opportunity cost is estimated to be: Revenue Fixed costs Variable costs (30%*$80. for July the opportunity cost would have been $2.29 Polar Bear Ski Wear [Notes about problem complexity: Item A is not coded as Step 2 because this is explicitly discussed in the chapter. it would lose the revenues.000) of revenues. Thus.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-25 E. electricity usually varies with hours of operation and possibly with the season (because of heating and air conditioning). In July there was a loss of $5.
D.5 = $152.2345 Y = $205. they are discretionary expenditures and not caused by the level of activity. generally mean there is more money available to spend on administrative travel. firm B's selling price is: $101.89 (average cost for each of the 100 units produced) Given a 50% markup on cost.028. 2. Although these expenditures are made because more money is available.89 x 1. Higher profits.2345 Y = $101.45 $ 514.50 = $1. and new office furniture or equipment.69 x 5 = $1.22 Firm B set its selling price based on the average cost.542. a 50% markup on total cost will cause sales to be: $1.542. using the learning curve equation Y = α Xr α = $300 instead of hours X (units produced) = 5 Learning rate = (ln 0. For example. employee training.45 x 1.30 Firm A and Firm B Costs for Firm A in the first year would be determined as follows. given a 100 unit production level: Y = α Xr Y = $300*100-0. correlation does not necessarily mean causation.2-26 Cost Management where the highest electricity costs occur during the summer because of air conditioning. higher profits generally occur during periods when activity is high.67 1. Many costs can be related to volume of activity. special promotions. However. then the highest sales might coincide with the highest electricity costs.69 (average cost for each of the 5 units) Total cost = $205.2345 Y = $300*5-0. A correlation may appear in a scatter plot or regression analysis.85/ln2) = 0.67 Firm A's income for last year was: Sales Costs Income $1. in turn.84 .028.028.45 Although each customer paid a different price.
84) = $1.897.85 x 1.28 $23.356.384.85 Thus Firm B's selling price this year was $64.55 1. Total cumulative production cost (300 x $78.50 Firm B's calculation for its selling price is as follows: Y = $300*300-0.40 1.50 = $97.65 (average cost for each of the 150 units produced) Firm B's income statement for last year was: Sales (150 x $152.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-27 Firm B's costs.2345 (notice that the cumulative units produced is 15) Y = $158.65) Income Firm A's revenues for this year are: (10 x $152. assuming an 85% learning effect would be: Y = $300*150-0.75) Total costs to produce the first 150 (from last year’s income statement) Total costs of this year’s production (150 units) Average cost per unit = $9.00 13.028.926.727.50 .97 (average cost for each of the 15 units produced) Total cost to produce the first 15 units (15 x $158.50 $ 9.028.00 13.625.897.528.45 $1.2345 Y = $92.40 Firm A's costs may be computed as follows: Y = $300*15-0.10 $ 172.528.10 $22.75 (average cost for each of the 300 units) Note that the cumulative production for Firm B through this year is 300 units.50/150 units = $64.97) Less costs from last year’s income statement for first five units Cost to produce the 10 units for this year Thus Firm A's income statement for this year is Sales Costs Income $1.2345 Y= $78.84) Costs (150 x $ 92.356.50 $ 9.727.30 $2.
50 Note that Firm B's selling price for this year of $97. Sales seems to be a potential cost driver because there appears to be a positive correlation between the marketing department costs and sales.com/college/eldenburg).000 $6. Scatter Plot of Marketing Costs Against Sales $175.28 is lower than Firm A's average cost per unit: $1.000 $145.000 $155. such extreme differences in cost can occur.wiley. and most of the observations appear to have a fairly linear trend.000 $5.000 $8.000 $7.500.com/college/eldenburg). 2.wiley. Such results often lead to charges of "unfair dumping" but with large differences in cumulative production volumes.000 Sales B.727.000 $135.85) Income $14.00 9.28) Costs (150 x $64.61.864. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.000 Marketing Dept. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.500. Costs $165. .10/10 = $135.50 $ 4.500.592.31 Belford’s The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.2-28 Cost Management Firm B's income statement for this year is Sales (150 x $97.356. There is a positive slope.500. A.
58184484 13. the cost estimate should not be based on past costs.7600071 P-value 2. it is economically plausible for sales to be a cost driver.4501E-10 5.00097028 t Stat 9. E. they may be positively correlated with sales.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-29 C. In addition.63816 0. there would be a positive correlation between marketing department costs and sales. the cost function is: TC = $65. usually annually. Assuming that profits are more likely to increase when sales increase. Even if marketing department costs are discretionary. Here is the regression output.93336396 R Square 0.87116829 Adjusted R Square 0. . Therefore. Instead. discretionary costs such as marketing are often increased when profits increase.08144 Observations 30 Coefficients 65584. Discretionary costs are set by decision. F. sales may go up.01335108 Standard Error 6844.584 + 1.5289E-14 Intercept X Variable 1 Based on the regression results. Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.86656716 Standard Error 4015. the decision maker(s) should be asked what next year’s cost will be. If the variable portion of the marketing cost is sales commissions. using regression or any other technique. When more money is spent on marketing.2608 0.34%*Sales D.
000 $160.000 $40.000 $120.000 $40. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.com/college/eldenburg).32 Peer Jets International The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2. Manufacturing Overhead Against Labor Hours Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200. A.000 $80.000 $120.com/college/eldenburg).2-30 Cost Management 2.wiley.000 $0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Labor Hours Manufacturing Overhead Against Machine Hours Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200.000 $80. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.wiley.000 $0 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Machine Hours .000 $160.
Costs and potential cost driver data are plotted to determine whether further analysis is necessary. labor hours could be deleted as a potential cost driver.02253618 Standard Error 11114. Sometimes a cost that is mostly variable. the cost driver does not explain the variation in cost.8173 Observations Coefficient s 150410.600712 P-value 6. Labor Hours Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.000 $120. Analysis of the plots involves looking for a linear or football-shaped positive slope or trend.86E-11 0.50852 7.01272369 Adjusted R Square -0. either the driver is wrong or the cost is mostly fixed. D. but the plot for labor hours appears to have the least trend.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-31 Manufacturing Overhead Against Raw Materials Manufacturing Overhead Cost $200. The plots help determine whether regression analysis should be performed using any of the potential drivers. If the observations are widely scattered.56597156 30 Standard Error 14812.11279932 R Square 0. Based only on the cost plots. None of the plots show a definite trend.000 $40.000 $0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Raw Materials B.552864 .000 $160.000 $80.682 4.1543 0. C.600936029 Intercept Labor Hours t Stat 10.
22* Raw materials .68E-12 0.2-32 Cost Management Only the intercept term is significantly different from zero.217192 Standard Error 10291.2266685 Standard Error 9665.62907 3.53627459 Intercept Raw Materials t Stat 11.56778 19.22*Machine hours Raw Materials Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.2533351 Adjusted R Square 0.411 Machine Hours Regression: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.91 60.1555 Observations 30 Coefficient s 117598.67 38.082222 P-value 3.3746211 Adjusted R Square 0.47803 9.612063 R Square 0.215128 Standard Error 10853. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $117. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $150.217 + $60.599 + $38. so the cost function is estimated as: TC = $126.095468 P-value 4.331580777 Intercept Machine Hours t Stat 11.9786 Observations 30 Coefficient s 126216.004579 Both the intercept and slope coefficients are significant.4268 4.11E-12 0.000325 Both the intercept and slope coefficients are significant.5033241 R Square 0.3522862 Standard Error 8846.
489 -0. A. F.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-33 E.10654585 Intercept Labor Hours Machine Hours Raw Materials t Stat 5.291558412 10. Labor hours can be eliminated as a potential driver because its coefficient is not significantly different from zero (see Part D). Yes.8266982 Adjusted R Square 0. the direct labor hours was not significantly related to manufacturing overhead costs using simple regression.1959303 48.886218 -0. this driver explains only 35% of the variation in cost.12E-09 1.wiley.3E-06 0.wiley. The coefficients for each of the other potential cost drivers are significantly different from zero. however.5558 Observations 30 Coefficient s 60988.08E-08 .9092294 R Square 0. 2.210187 P-value 3. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.352 0.05878 9. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.218173 8.976635 Standard Error 10361.33 Peer Jets International (continued) The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.com/college/eldenburg).com/college/eldenburg). Multiple regression with all three potential cost drivers: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8067018 Standard Error 4832. and the adjusted R-Squares from the regressions are: Machine Hours Raw Materials 0.2349 3.226 Based on the simple regression results. machine hours appears to do the best job of explaining manufacturing overhead costs.778501 82.333162437 5.953575 1.
its coefficient is not significantly different from zero in either regression.450561 8. Each task includes different activities.022 0. Labor hours does not appear to be a cost driver when using either simple regression or multiple regression.74*Machine hours + $82. Multiple regression using machine hours and raw materials as cost drivers: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.86E-07 4. In this example.7422519 82.352 0.5902 48.939606 9.664851 5.001) $60.988 (<0.925842 30 Standard Error 8743.78 (<0.71E-10 5.2-34 Cost Management Comparison of simple and multiple regression results: Intercept t-stat (p-value) Independent Variables t-stat (p-value) Labor Machine Raw Hours Hours Materials Adj.29E-09 The cost function is: TC = $60.82667515 Adjusted R Square 0.93*Raw materials D. C.22 (<0.411 (<0.001) $126.678 + $48. machine hours and raw materials explain different activity . R2 Simple Regressions: Labor Hours Machine Hours Raw Materials Multiple Regression 0. Costs for these activities are likely related to specific cost drivers. Also.001) B.98 (<0.81383627 Standard Error 4742.352 and 0.881964042 Intercept Machine Hours Raw Materials t Stat 6.001) $4.001) $60.001) $117.806) than in either of the simple regressions (0.90921678 R Square 0. its coefficient is negative rather than positive in the multiple regression.226 0.57 (0.157604083 9.20 (0. A combination of cost drivers does a much better job of explaining the variation in manufacturing overhead costs than either cost driver alone. labor hours can be eliminated as a potential cost driver.806 $150.217 (<0. Thus. Manufacturing can be a complex activity requiring a number of different tasks.22 (0.5348 Observations Coefficient s 60677.226) for these two cost drivers.954) $48. The adjusted RSquare is far higher in the multiple regression (0. Both machine hours and raw materials are positive and significantly different from zero when using simple regression and also when using multiple regression.001) $-0.005) $82.55) $38.599 (<0.391636 P-value 1.
They may either praise or criticize top management when the situation may not warrant it. More importantly. If Regina submits unrealistically low budgets this month and then more accurate budgets next month. in their role of oversight. They may also use the inaccurate information to help them approve decisions. Although the board is not directly involved in day-to-day operations. The relationship between the CEO and the board should be one of trust and confidence. if she submits a budget based on last year’s budget and she knows that this is likely to be inaccurate. C. 2.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-35 costs. they need the most current information available and explanations for information that is not available. they will draw erroneous conclusions about the performance of the organization and the top management. such as machining work on units. Regina has at least two choices in this situation. When the budget is complete the board will likely see it again and notice the discrepancies between the preliminary and actual budgets and wonder why the first budget was so inaccurate. She can tell the Director of Finance that she cannot produce a very accurate budget within two days or she can pull together something that may not be very accurate. This is a potential ethical dilemma for Regina because the Direct of Finance believes that he can rely on Regina’s work when he presents the budget to the board. If Regina uses last period’s budget. and use last year’s budgets for departments that have not turned theirs in. However.34 Software Solutions A. If they have outdated information and inaccurate information. the department amounts and total budget may be quite inaccurate. the board may make inappropriate decisions based on faulty data. . but with large increases in department costs. A better understanding of the manufacturing process improves the ability to determine the types and number of cost drivers that can be used in a more complete cost function. the board may begin to lose trust in the CEO’s ability to manage operations. and materials handling for the units. her reputation would also suffer. B. The board of directors monitors the performance of the CEO and top management. Regina should submit the most current information she has. and the Director of Finance will present the board with information that is unreliable. and that could reflect negatively on the Finance Director. with a flag indicating that the information quality is low for the budgets in those departments and an explanation that the budget is currently based on last year’s information. such as a business expansion. She may believe that her reputation as a diligent employee would suffer if she cannot produce something.
000 $10. Dept.com/college/eldenburg).000 $0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Maintenance Hours Worked Scatter Plot of Maintenance Costs Against Number of Students Maint. B. Students may have thought of other drivers that could be logically related to cleaning maintenance costs. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www.000 $15.000 $5. Costs $25.000 $10. or number of classes and activities per period. I would eliminate number of students because there does not seem to be a positive linear relationship between maintenance cost and number of students. Dept. A. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.2-36 Cost Management 2.000 $5.000 $20.wiley. number of hours students attend school. Other cost drivers for total maintenance cost could be number of rooms cleaned. Costs $25.000 $15.000 $0 528 530 532 534 536 538 540 542 Number of Students C. number of hours the building is open. .wiley.35 Brush Prairie High School The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.com/college/eldenburg). Scatter Plot of Maintenance Costs Against Number of Maintenance Hours Worked Maint.000 $20. square feet cleaned.
03271 Standard Error 3019.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-37 D.63E-06 2.438328 According to the R Square statistics. E. it is considered fixed.461245 7.9 244.847440356 Adjusted R Square 0. The total cost function is: TC = $9.18E-05 Regression output for maintenance cost and number of students: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. Therefore. Regression results for maintenance cost and number of maintenance hours worked: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0. it is logical to expect a strong relation between hours worked and cost. and rent for this type of facility is usually fixed.135 + $35.06772 Observations 12 Standard Error 965.920565237 R Square 0.796328319 Intercept X Variable 1 Coefficients 9134. However. changes in maintenance hours worked explains more than 80% of the changes in maintenance cost while number of students explains none. From the analyses performed.832184392 Standard Error 1217. An unidentified cost driver could have a higher R-Square.74733262 t Stat 9.74*maintenance hours worked.247329 R Square 0.68624 0.453062 P-value 2.0261 Standard Error 130954. The p-values on the Tstatistics are very small. it is rational to conclude that hours worked will provide a reasonable estimate of future costs.061172 Adjusted R Square -0.875134 35.173 Observations 12 Coefficient s -89867 197. The most current value is used to . It cannot be known for certain whether the number of maintenance hours is the best cost driver because every single possible cost driver cannot be identified.0857 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat -0.508157 0.36 The Elder Clinic A and B Salaries are always fixed.807201 P-value 0. Utilities cost varies with season not visits.5045837 4. 2. providing high confidence that both the intercept and slope are different from zero. maintenance hours is a reasonable cost driver.
affecting the number of visits at this clinic.07*patient-visits C.07 Patient-visits X * The value in June is used for fixed costs because the increase in salaries will hold into the future. This analysis suggests that there are some of the other expenses are variable costs and some fixed. • Prices of all inputs could change (usually increase).80 D. July expenses are estimated to be: TC = $19. such as snake anti-venom. Sample solutions and a discussion of typical student responses will be included in assessment guidance on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. These would be fixed. There are many possible reasons that could be listed. and so on. Some supplies. Category Medical staff salaries* Medical supplies used** Administrative salaries Rent Utilities Other expenses Total Expenses Fixed $14. E.934)/(849 – 778). each patient requires a certain number of supplies. must be kept on hand whether or not they are used.182 = F + $3.736 Variable $3.2-38 Cost Management predict next period’s utilities.49*849.736 + $6.441. Medical supplies vary with number of patient-visits. There is no one answer to this part. These would be variable. At 940 patient-visits. Also. current illnesses that are circulating in the area. new equipment is acquired. such as tongue depressors.wiley. other facilities may open or close. Other expenses appear to increase and decrease with number of patientvisits. and costs go up as patient-visits increase. Visits are affected by season. Given the preceding computations and cost summary.$2. Here are some of the reasons: • The managers will not know how many visits they will receive.58 $6. or there are changes in treatment procedures for certain illnesses. so this cost is classified as a mixed cost. the cost function is: TC = $19.115 219 3.49 Cost Driver Patient-visits Mixed X 2.412 1. Therefore.49 ($3.07*940 = $25. variable cost is $3. medical supplies is a mixed cost. • Treatments and related costs may change as new drugs are available. weather. **Using high-low. but not proportionately. Use the same method for other expenses. high point of medical supplies cost and patient data.736 + $6. Use March. .182 . and so on. to find fixed: $3.100 226 664 $19. gloves.com/college/eldenburg).
Number of work stations might come from the department head. . The choice of information sources depends on how the past cost information is to be used. Some future costs can be estimated with high accuracy based on prior commitments (e. cost allocation records could be used to identify past costs.37 Cost function Judgment and Method A.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-39 2. It would be useful to obtain several years of monthly data from which to prepare scatter plots and run regression analysis. Alternatively. regression analysis would probably be the best choice. or total number of Internet customers. with representative points selected from a scatter plot. In some ways. C. If not. Some costs are discretionary. The cost object is the help line. etc. and other miscellaneous costs. supplies. Number of customers is part of the revenue accounting records. Accounting records could be accessed to determine the wage rates and time worked for help support staff and supervisors. Regression analysis makes use of all data points and is more accurate than twopoint methods. number of work stations. B. D. number of employees. prepaid insurance schedules. could be used to identify costs for building and occupancy costs. and others could be interviewed to identify any potential cost increases or other expected changes in cost behavior from prior periods. and D. E. depreciation schedules. C. a two point method might be best. assuming a linear cost function. If enough data points are available. If the service is housed in a common building.g. Information about number of employees and hours worked is found in the payroll accounting system. 2. Vendors. or it might need to be estimated if it has not been tracked in the past. Number of calls might have to be tracked by employees or by the telephone system.38 Personal Cost Function A. Other costs are highly uncertain and subject to external factors that cannot be controlled. The answers to these questions depend on the individual student’s data and cost behavior. If the help line is housed in its own building. department heads. Possible cost drivers include number of calls handled. rent). a personal budget estimation problem is similar to the cost estimation problem for a business.. analysis at the account level could be used to develop a cost function using information from the general ledger. This data could be found in the accounting system. B. number of hours worked. Analysis of general ledger entries could be used to determine past costs for phone service.
but there is insufficient information to make an adjustment.736 To predict future overhead.036 68.2-40 Cost Management 2.10. 80% of September 2 payroll to August: .83/mo.8 x 6.300 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 + 36 Other Payroll3 Adjusted Cost $68. If these observations are included in the regression analysis. as shown in the scatter plot below. B. . A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. IP-14 3 Payroll paid every two weeks. The miscellaneous supplies account also looks suspicious.750. the first month is adjusted even though it is not an actual cost: 4.286 68.000 = 4. Adjustments to more accurately reflect overhead costs incurred: Unadjusted Overhead Mar $68.300/10 x 12 = 35. Because of the large difference between these values and the values in other months. A. July’s result is an outlier and should be removed from the data.800 41.com/college/eldenburg).000 + 500 + 500 + 500 + 500 + 500 Depreciation(b) +$36 1 + 36 -4.750 + 4.596 73.150 73.500 x 1/2 = 2.500 38.310 70.736 67. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www.236 69.200 +$2.2. (rounded to $36) 2 Note IB-4's power added to Dept.376 65. the trend line is likely to distort costs.com/college/eldenburg).200 Apr 71. these are correctly handled.486 68. No adjustments are needed for items (c) and (d). Operations in the month of July are not typical of the rest of the time period.800.750 .wiley.250 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov 1 Property Tax(a) +$500 + 500 + 500 + 500 -3.4.wiley.750 68.800 .350 68. 1/2 of August 5 payroll goes to July: 5.686 71. Similarly.850 2 .790 80.39 Smeyer Industries The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.
47 8 Standard Error 29406. Monthly overhead costs for supplies may be significantly overstated or understated .500 Outlier Direct Labor Hours C.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-41 Scatter Plot of Adjusted Overhead Costs Against Direct Labor Hours $75.000 3.050976 P-value 0. supplies were a large proportion of overhead cost.641981 0.775388 0. they are most likely recorded at the time of purchase rather than at the time of use.000 $60. the cost function is estimated as: Overhead cost = $6.000 $50.000 2.310484 Intercept X Variable 1 Coefficient s 8777. Therefore.000 $45.818 6. Here are the regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations 0.000 $65.79 * direct labor hours This cost function might not provide a very accurate estimate for future costs because the direct labor hours explain only about 31% of the variation in overhead costs (based on the adjusted R-square).000 $55.000 9.000 6. considerable future variation in overhead costs is likely to occur due to factors other than changes in direct labor hours. According to the details provided for August and September.314163 1980. D.298502 2.500 8. the fixed cost does not appear to be different from zero.789722 t Stat 0. Based on the variation in dates at which supplies are recorded.412139 0.26 3.500 5. Thus.000 Overhead Costs $70.086126 Based on the t-statistic and p-value for the intercept.000 $40.
Thus. Third.2-42 Cost Management if the amount of supplies inventory varies significantly from month to month. there could be seasonal variation in costs such as overtime pay and utilities. financial statements may be prepared less frequently than data is collected for cost estimation. small adjustments that may be material when estimating a cost might not be sufficiently material to the financial statements for adjustments in the accounting records. Additional adjustments include any expected changes in costs from prior periods. the accounting records might not accurately reflect the costs incurred during each time period. First. In addition. . Second. Prior cost data should be adjusted for these changes before the data are used to estimate future costs. However. but if the company would like information about predicted monthly costs. For example. Following are three reasons for making adjustments when estimating cost functions. The process of preparing financial statements often includes adjustments so that costs are recorded in the correct time period. this may not be a problem. power costs could be adjusted upward if utility rates in the future are expected to be higher than in the past. adjustments could be made to adjust the balance in supplies inventory each month. If the cost function is for annual costs. these variations would need to be considered. sometimes known changes have occurred in prices or cost behavior. E.
variable or mixed. Uncertainties prevent identification of single “correct” measurement methods. For example. the main focus was on measuring costs for a cost object. the best choice of estimation technique. Fixed costs are often irrelevant to decisions.40 Focus on Professional Competency: Measurement A. See Exhibit 2. it is necessary to use judgment when choosing and applying measurement methods. When estimating a cost function: a. 4. a cost function should distinguish between fixed and variable costs. A measurement is appropriate if it is suitable for the purpose. high-low method. analysis at the account level. It is often difficult to identify an appropriate. 1. two-point method. Thus. A measurement is reliable if it if it is reasonably free from error and bias. Chapter 2 introduced the following measurement methods for estimating a cost function: Engineered estimate of cost. A measurement is relevant if the resulting cost function information helps decision makers choose between alternative courses of action. simple regression.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-43 BUILD YOUR PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES 2. which factors drive variable costs. A cost function estimated from past cost data may be unreliable if future operating activities are expected to occur in a different relevant range. B. b. relevant. 3. and multiple regression (Appendix 2A). and how to interpret computational results. . It is also necessary to evaluate the quality of measurement results when using accounting information. whereas variable costs are often relevant. 2. sometimes the cost of obtaining a better measure exceeds the benefits.17 for the pros and cons of each method. A measurement method such as simple regression is appropriate if past cost patterns are expected to continue in the future and i the cost is linearly related to the cost driver. The costs and benefits of alternative measures should also be considered. then simple regression is inappropriate. how to categorize costs as fixed. for example. c. in Chapter 2 pointed out that a cost function is estimated within a relevant range of activity. and they prevent complete accuracy in making accounting measurements. which typically involved creating a cost function for one or more individual costs. whether past cost behaviors will continue in the future. If the cost is believed to be nonlinear. C. and reliable measure for estimating a cost function because of uncertainties about: data availability. Suppose a cost function is measured for the purpose of estimating future costs. In Chapter 2. For example.
• The format should be concise. However. Note: Some of these ideas were adapted from the Path to Higher-Quality Management Decisions presented in Chapter 1 (Exhibit 1. the manager should be informed about key uncertainties or risks associated with using the cost function. If the report will be used by a manager who needs to estimate future costs. taking into account the knowledge and interests of the user. It is typically appropriate to use more technical language in reports written for other accountants than in reports written for non-accounting audiences. irrelevant. Here are some desirable characteristics of a report about an estimated cost function. then it should probably describe all of the major decisions involved in developing the cost function. If the user needs to make a decision quickly. . clear. D. the user should be informed about the priorities used in creating the report. students might think of others. • The report should focus on information that will be relevant to the user. Changing circumstances can change the patterns of cost behavior and cause an estimated cost function to be inappropriate. then the details of the estimation process may be irrelevant. People who lack objectivity are likely to present biased information that impairs high quality decision making. and easy to understand. • The desired quality of the report should be weighed against the timeliness of information for the user. However.2-44 Cost Management 5. then it may be more important to provide the cost function information rapidly than to prepare a high quality report. If the report will be presented to a superior within the accounting department. It is important to present the cost function information objectively to improve its relevance and reliability for the user.9). • The use of technical language should depend on the audience. and/or unreliable.
41 Integrating Across the Curriculum: Statistics [Note about problem complexity: This homework problem was written with adequate instructions so that students should be able to perform the various regression analyses that are called for.7748991 R Square 0.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-45 2. Here are the simple regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.04 13. the cost function was estimated by regressing actual labor costs on number of chairs produced.02E-10 Based on the regression results.3147402 P-value 3. the degree of downward bias is higher for older data than for more recent data. Because of the annual pay increases.437E-24 1.609693 1. .] The data for this problem can be found on the datasets file for chapter 2.678620854 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat 19.194 + $13. Considerable variation in labor costs is not explained by changes in the volume of production. the regression explains only about 59% of the variation in labor costs.96 x number of chairs produced However.wiley. Also. The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $133. B. A spreadsheet showing the solutions for this problem is available on the Instructor’s web site for the textbook (available at www. A. available on both the Instructor and Student web sites for the textbook (available at www. In prior years. However.957296 Standard Error 6710. the prior labor costs are biased downward—future labor costs are expected to be higher than past labor costs.848277 8.com/college/eldenburg).5917832 Standard Error 6216. using monthly data for the prior 4 years.com/college/eldenburg). the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit are each positive and statistically different from zero. students are likely to struggle interpreting and choosing a method (Parts E and F).wiley.6004687 Adjusted R Square 0.7995 Observations 48 Coefficient s 133194.
869633 Adjusted R Square 0. The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $133.09577 6. but the variable cost increased from $13. D.00872 Intercept X Variable 1 X Variable 2 t Stat 18.311 200.736 + $16.742261 Standard Error 5148.8 16. the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit are each positive and statistically different from zero.891 1.54295 Standard Error 5689.390275 Intercept X Variable 1 t Stat 24.347 x 1.486389 P-value 4. here are the regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.74).864722 R Square 0.23 x number of chairs produced This regression provides a more reasonable cost function than the previous version because it explains a higher proportion of the variation in labor costs (adjusted R-square of 0. Here are the multiple regression results: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.23 per chair.93821 16.010513 1. which is reasonable given the increase in wage rates over time. Here are a couple of months’ data for double-checking the calculation of adjusted labor costs: Month Original Labor Cost Jan 20X1 $203.02)4 $196.73E-20 5. The fixed cost is nearly the same.26499 6.932541 R Square 0.347 Calculation $203.91E-08 .905 Observations 48 Coefficient s 133736 16.863839 Standard Error 3742.411 Observations 48 Coefficient s 107748.747745 Adjusted R Square 0.35E-15 Based on the regression results.05E-27 2.67711 P-value 1. Nevertheless.57E-23 2. this cost function would result in a higher estimate for future costs.02 Adjusted Labor Cost $220.2-46 Cost Management C.274 Using the adjusted labor cost data.492 1. Also.06236 11.533 x (1.533 Dec 20X4 196. approximately 26% of the variation in labor costs is still unexplained.23439 Standard Error 5557.96 to $16.
26 x current month number of chairs produced + $6. The first slope coefficient ($16. there may be some lag between the time that production volumes change and labor costs change. On one hand. and this regression explains more of the variation in labor costs (86%).749 + $16. On the other hand. it could be argued that some other cost driver might do a better job of predicting future labor costs. the two cost drivers together explain a very high proportion (86%) of the variation in past labor costs.l6 for each chair produced during the month. If the prior month’s production was higher than this month’s production. The second slope coefficient requires more thought. E. it often takes time for the company to hire qualified new workers. However. Thus. . each month’s labor costs are expected to increase by $6. According to the multiple regression results. F.Chapter 2: The Cost Function 2-47 Based on the regression results.54 x prior month number of chairs produced The statistics suggest that this is a more reasonable cost function than the previous version because all coefficients are positive statistically different from zero. and to decrease the number of workers when production volumes decrease. the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit for each cost driver are all positive and statistically different from zero. then this month’s labor costs will reflect the higher level of labor cost.54 for each chair produced during the prior month. and the managers often delay laying off employees when volumes decline. In addition. The cost function is estimated as: Labor cost = $107. if the prior month’s production was lower than this month’s production. There is no one single answer to this question. it appears that both independent variables should be included in the cost function because they both have a logical cause-and-effect relationship with labor costs. the company’s policy is to increase the number of workers when production volumes increase. Conversely. each month’s labor costs are expected to increase by $16. and they both have positive and statistically significant coefficients. then this month’s labor costs will reflect a lower level of labor cost. As explained in the problem.26) is interpreted in a straight-forward way.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.