P. 1
9/11 Research - Bookmarks

9/11 Research - Bookmarks

|Views: 1,158|Likes:
Published by anthonyc31
Deep research with bookmarks to all events of 9/11.
Special focus on Dimitri Khalezov testimony.
Deep research with bookmarks to all events of 9/11.
Special focus on Dimitri Khalezov testimony.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: anthonyc31 on Feb 20, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/04/2013

pdf

text

original

Bookmarks 2012-10-22 - 9/11

Table of Contents
9/11 BEST Links Articles Dimitri Khalezov Links Articles Dimitri Links Videos Evidence - Bathtub, Vehicles, etc Evidence - Iceage Evidence - Nuclear Articles Videos Jeff Prager Operation Plowshare Evidence - Pentagon Missile Evidence - Radiation Articles Videos Viktor Bout research old news articles Videos Documentaries High profile opinions Who did it? Articles Gelatin B-Thing Dancing Israelis Videos Pentagon (F77) Articles & Links WTC 1&2 Evidence spire WTC 7 No Planes (F11, F175) Links Articles Ace Baker - Psy Opera Simon Shack - Nose Out Impossible Speed Media Fraud Documentaries

Hijackers Naudett Brothers People Waving Videos Shanksville (F93) Media, Witnesses, Calls, Families Rescue Workers, NYFD photos Evidence Commission Report, Truthers Forums, Blogs, Youtube comments Good guys Disinfo, Debunkers Disinfo - YouTube (Agents, Zionists, Teams) Disinfo - YouTube (Misguided) Disinfo - People, Sites Debunkers Judy Wood & DEW

9/11

back to top

Deep research into the events of 9/11. Special focus on the testimony of Dimitri Khalezov regarding the nuclear demolition of the WTC. Of all the 9/11 material, Dimitri's testimony provides the most compreshensive and most logical explanation of the events of 9/11. I highly recommend watching the 2-part documentary interview "9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full)" and "9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full)" under Dimitri Khalzov, where Dimitri explains what happened on 9/11 in detail. Another very important body of research is from Ace Baker who proves that extensive digital manipulation was used on 9/11 to fake the WTC plane crashes. Ace Baker's in-depth analysis of the video footate proves that real planes did not hit the towers. This is the most controversial topic among 9/11 researchers, and is met with great opposition by known disinformaiton agents online. Watch the video "07 - The Key EXCELLENT - BEST - YouTube" under Ace Baker.

BEST

back to top

9/11 Solved - YouTube - Playlist http://tinyurl.com/ctsynm7 *** CLICK "MORE" TO READ **** These videos represent the most logical and most comprehensive explanations of what truly happened on 9/11. Dimitri Khalezov provides testimony as to exactly what caused the WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 to collapse, and using this insight, he explains virtually all other events on 9/11 in unsurpassed detail and clarity. Ace Baker and Simon Shack analyze various 9/11 video footage and proves beyond any doubt that real airplanes did not hit the WTC. The airplanes we saw on 9/11 were digital deceptions. They were no real After doing my own research into 9/11, I have concluded that these documentaries and videos are the most accurate and most truthful explanations of that day. Apart from some documentaries, such as Simon Shack's September Clues, I have not found anything else, including Judy Wood and the various Thermite theories, that offer a better explanation of each and every 9/11 event as concisely as these videos. Unlike various disinfo agents running around YouTube, ridiculing and discouraging people from watching certain 9/11 videos, i instead, encourage you to watch whichever videos interest you and research whatever theories you like. Scrutinize all information and follow the evidence where it leads you. Here is my full research on 9/11: http://www.scribd.com/doc/82151575 Blog post with support evidence for Dimitri Khalezov: http://ac31.blogspot.ca/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html We all saw airplanes flying and crashing into the WTC towers on television. However, taking a serious and closer look at the media footage has proven that what we saw that day was an elaborate digital deception. The main stream media featured various (lie) witnesses

that claimed to see airplanes, but there were just as many witnesses that said they saw and heard explosions and no airplanes. Reviewing the evidence of airplanes, and more importantly, serious lack of evidence, begs many questions. Where is all the airplane debris at the WTC and Pentagon? There should be 6 x 63' wings, 3 x 155' fuselages, and 3 x 52' tall tail wings, 6 x 31' rear wings, and 672 plane seats from those "crashes", yet strangely there isn't any significant evidence. And somehow, the paper passports of all the alleged hijackers (who are still alive, mind you) were allegedly found within hours of these events. Where are the missing rubble piles at Ground Zero? There should have been two giant rubble piles, each of them 50-80' tall, instead we saw an incredible amount of inexplicable dust during the two WTC collapses. How did steel and concrete not affected by alleged kerosene fires turn into dust? Why are the 9/11 Rescue Workers dying from rare cancers illnesses, not limited to lung disorders, at such an alarming rate? What was the definition of Ground Zero before 9/11? These videos address these perplexing questions and provide clear answers to what truly happened on 9/11. I encourage you to watch each video, and research the claims made for yourself. The 9/11 "truth" movement was hijacked a long time ago. Those high-profile movements promote some truth mixed with inaccurate theories and outright lies that keep 9/11 truth seekers away from the real truth. Disinformation agents post negative comments about these documentaries and discourage people from watching them. Ignore that nonsense. I ask that you watch these videos carefully, research the information presented, and make up your own mind. Good luck with your research. My 9/11 Research Bookmarks http://tinyurl.com/78gmwn6 9/11 Solved - YouTube - This Playlist http://tinyurl.com/ctsynm7 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov 1of2 http://tinyurl.com/7sw8jsx 9/11: The Third Truth Dimitri Khalezov 2of2 http://tinyurl.com/7unohab 9/11 Ace Baker proves no planes hit the WTC http://tinyurl.com/7qrhmov 9/11 NOSE OUT - Simon Shack proves no plane hit WTC 2 http://tinyurl.com/7b26byk 9/11 NOSED OUT - Calculations prove no planes hit WTC http://tinyurl.com/82yhqco Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax http://tinyurl.com/cl53uwj Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov (Scribd) http://tinyurl.com/74mplv4 9/11 Rescue Workers Suffer from Radiation Exposure (Scribd) http://tinyurl.com/7hdchhv Nuclear Demolition Article http://tinyurl.com/88dyfo5

9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full) http://tinyurl.com/7sw8jsx (Part 1 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In Part 1, Dimitri explains: Dimitri Khalezov background - Planes and explosions - Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2) - Nuclear detonations explained - WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition ------------------------------------------------------ 9/11 - Who did it? Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4Vig_snwQ ------------------------------------------------------ Part 2 of 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=c39O-ftZboU Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486 See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/sets/72157626610632869/ Edits to original interview include: - combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips - Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: http://www.911-

truth.net 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full) http://tinyurl.com/7unohab (Part 2 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses this insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In this Part 2, Dimitri explains: - WTC 7 - Ground Zero definition - Pentagon missile attack in detail - Seismic readings - 911 media manipulation - F93 crash in Shanksville, PA - Cell phone calls - Hijackers - 911 rescue workers and illness - Ground Zero cleanup ------------------------------------------------------ 9/11 - Who did it? - Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4Vig_snwQ ------------------------------------------------------ Part 1 of 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=vNuKAdGlxFo Another excellent interview is with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri explains "who did it" and why the culprits became interested in meeting with him. The entire interview is excellent but Part 10 is where Dimitri discuss "who did it": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4Vig_snwQ Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486 See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/sets/72157626610632869/ Edits to the original interview include: - combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: http://www.911-truth.net Nuclear Demolition - WikiSpooks http://tinyurl.com/88dyfo5 Ask Questions Blog: Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov's 9/11 Testimony http://tinyurl.com/432w33o Ask Questions Blog: 9/11 Rescue Workers Suffer from Radiation Exposure http://tinyurl.com/6gyh3s4

07 - The Key - EXCELLENT - BEST - YouTube 9/11 NOSE OUT - Simon Shack proves no plane hit WTC 2 - YouTube http://tinyurl.com/7b26byk Simon Shack exposes the 9/11 digital deception of "airplanes" crashing into the WTC as a giant fraud. I do not agree with Simon Shacks theory that 9/11 was an entire media hoax, however, his research proving that a real plane did not crash into the WTC 2 is outstanding. I encourage you to research this topic. See Ace Baker and Dimitri Khalezov as well. --------------------------- From Simon Shack's original "NOSED OUT" video description: The complete video analysis of the WNYW FOX5 "Nose-Out" shot aired live on 9/11. NO matter how this awful error

occured, we may all agree that the cockpit of an airplane crashing into a steel building will not emerge from its other side - INTACT. For definitive proof that the FOX archives have replaced their 9/11 archives due to this horridly botched computer imagery intended to deceive, please watch: FOXED OUT part2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURVjoLI At the end of "FoxedOut part 2" you will see that the "Nose-Out" shot is actually (even though only for a few frames) STILL VISIBLE IN THE CURRENT FOX5 ARCHIVES !!! The 9/11 TV HOAX is now comprehensively exposed. FOR ALL THE Q & A regarding my longstanding research, please visit the SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info 9/11 NOSE OUT - Calculations prove no plane hit WTC 2 - YouTube http://tinyurl.com/82yhqco This short video helps prove that the 2nd "airplane" crash at the WTC was in fact a digital deception. Credit to Simon Shack and Ace Baker for initially discovering the media deception of the deception of the digital airplanes hitting the WTC on 9/11. We were all fooled that day, and this is not a fun topic to explore. I encourage everyone to research this topic thoroughly. Article with detailed calculations here: http://911logic.blogspot.ca/2006/10/911-tv-fakery-hunt-boeing-wtc-2.html http://tinyurl.com/cl53uwj Full credit to: 911logic.blogspot.com research by StillDiggin (his YouTube account is now closed) Note: I did not make this video, but i made almost identical calculations and confirmed these findings. StillDiggin: 9/11 TV-Fakery... Hunt the Boeing (WTC) 2: Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax http://tinyurl.com/cl53uwj Blogger: User Profile: spooked (excellent 9/11 blog) BLOCKED Ace Baker proves no planes hit the WTC on 9/11 - YouTube http://tinyurl.com/7qrhmov Ace Baker provides the best and most thorough analysis proving that real planes did not hit the WTC. Yes, it's very difficult to believe that the various videos and photos showing planes hitting the WTC on 9/11 were all digitally manipulated, and that the various lie-witnessed did in fact lie about seeing planes and that the media new stream was a controlled event, but the facts in this video leave no doubt. Note that there was absolutely no live footage showing planes hit the towers. Several attempts to debunk Ace Baker's analysis have failed including the most shameful attempt by Mr. Wright on the Hardfire interview with Ron Wieck. This video dismantles the attempting debunking by Mr. Wright, which people have used to claim this analysis to be wrong. Unfortunately for them, Mr Wright is wrong and his lies and misrepresentations are fully exposed. Watch this video in full and you be the judge.

Links

back to top

9/11 Research Bookmarks Complete 911 Timeline Complete 911 Timeline: American Airlines Flight 11 Index page • Cluesforum.info Deep Politics Monitor: 9/11 Nuclear demolition - Dimitri Khalezov's video interview & free book link Debunking the Debunkers: Why Should I Care About This Stuff, Even if it's True Isn't it a Distraction From More Important Issues? VIDEO: THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY AND COVER-UP Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report: Government, Military, Intelligence 9/11 Cover-up - Verifiable Media Reports on 9/11 Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report List of Resources for Fact Finders 911 - The PENTAGON in FLAMES

9-11 Commission Final Report 9-11 Research: WTC Master Plan Renaissance Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Former CIA and top official speak openly about 911 Former CIA and top official speak openly about 911 nearingmidnight's Channel - YouTube 911 Index Ace Baker - No Planes Analysis 9/11 - The Great American Psy-Opera September 11 News.com - President George W. Bush Address to the United Nations on November 10, 2001. We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty. To inflame ethnic hatred is to advance the cause of terror.

Christopher Bollyn

Articles

back to top

Nuclear demolition is another kind of controlled demolition. Wikipedia: controlled demolition through nuclear demolition Killtown's: 250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media - Connecting the dots. Killtown's: 9/11 coincidences and oddities page! - 2001 Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect - index EXCLUSIVE: Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11 - FoxNews.com The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism Family Members Of Doomed 911 Flights 'Strangely Silent' About Irregularities and Inconsistencies Of Official Government Story WTC Steel Was So Hot It Bent Without Cracking & Fused With The Concrete Michael Harari - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Ground zero | Define Ground zero at Dictionary.com September 11 attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The fix is in: Bush cousin presides over 9/11 suit against Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers « Truth and Shadows Unanswered Questions of 9/11: 911 Prewarnings, Building 7 Collapse, Flight 77 and the Pentagon, Israeli Involvement, United Airlines Put-options, War games, Atta and the $100,000, 9/11 Terrorists Still Alive | Project Censored 9/11: allowed to happen and given technical assistance to make sure it happened How 9/11 was done September 11 attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 9-11 Research: Asbestos in the WTC The World Trade Center - Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure at The Mesothelioma Center New Findings in WTC asbestos levels World Trade Center Demolition Critiqe of Collapse Theories 9-11 Research: The McCormick Place Roof Collapse 9-11 Research: Other Building Collapses

Odigo Clarifies 911 Attack Messages Odigo Says Workers Were Warned of 9/11 Attacks Rescue Worker Drops New 9/11 Revelations Odigo - 911myths Odigo says workers were warned of attack - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News The Insider - The Israelis who were warned hours before 9/11 Eerie Image Pulled From CD snopes.com: The Coup Cover Art WAFTIT - AN ECLECTIC COLLECTION OF CONTRAVERSIES, MUSINGS, AND WAFTS NIST lied to cover up the WTC demolition | The Blog of the WTC Demolition Site 9/11 - ARE AMERICANS THE VICTIMS OF A HOAX? 911 Conspiracy Theories Given Currency By Mainstream Media World Trade Center Pictures - Copyright (c) 2001 Todd Rengel “Obama’s Wars”: The Real Story Bob Woodward Won’t Tell | 911Blogger.com Where is the Plane, Flight 77? America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero . Uncovering Property, p. 2 | PBS Tons of gold vanished out of the World Trade Center after 9/11, who took it? - Yahoo! Answers World Trade Center Gold Heist - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums World Trade Center South Tower Demolition live on abc with Peter Jennings and St Zogby International - Polling, Market Research, First Globals Zogby Poll Finds Over 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation - 911truth.org 'Historian' claims 9-11 plot by Vatican, U.S. Top Mafia Figure, Tony Gambino, Implicates Vatican And Bush in Prior Knowledge And Complicity in 9/11 Mass Murder (The grandson of Lucky Luciano, Gambino, just released from prison also sets the record straight about the JFK & Hoffa assassinations) -- Freedom Underground Wing TV - Connect The Dots - 9-11: The Biggest Lie EVER! by Victor Thorn

Dimitri Khalezov Links

back to top

back to top

9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full) (Part 1 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In Part 1, Dimitri explains: - Dimitri Khalezov background - Planes and explosions - Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2) - Nuclear detonations explained - WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition ----------------------------------------------------- 9/11 - Who did it? - Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike

wanted to meet Dimitri: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4Vig_snwQ ----------------------------------------------------- Part 2 of 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=c39O-ftZboU Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486 See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/sets/72157626610632869/ Edits to original interview include: - combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips - Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: http://www.911-truth.net 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full) (Part 2 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses this insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In this Part 2, Dimitri explains: - WTC 7 - Ground Zero definition - Pentagon missile attack in detail - Seismic readings - 911 media manipulation - F93 crash in Shanksville, PA - Cell phone calls - Hijackers - 911 rescue workers and illness - Ground Zero cleanup ------------------------------------------------------ 9/11 - Who did it? - Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4Vig_snwQ ----------------------------------------------------- Part 1 of 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=vNuKAdGlxFo Another excellent interview is with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri explains "who did it" and why the culprits became interested in meeting with him. The entire interview is excellent but Part 10 is where Dimitri discuss "who did it": http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=1H4Vig_snwQ Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486 See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/sets/72157626610632869/ Edits to the original interview include: combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: http://www.911-truth.net Ask Questions Blog: Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov's 9/11 Testimony http://tinyurl.com/432w33o Ask Questions Blog: 9/11 Rescue Workers Suffer from Radiation Exposure

http://tinyurl.com/6gyh3s4 Ask Questions Blog: Dimitri Khalezov reply to Judy Wood supporter Nuclear Demolition - WikiSpooks http://tinyurl.com/88dyfo5 v4 Dimitri Khalezov - Banned from Alex Jones Prison Forum Forum vF Dimitri Khalezov Discussion Banned From Alex Jones Prison Planet Forum (FINAL CUT) http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486

WTC Spires Explained - Dimitri Khalezov - YouTube 9/11 Nuclear Demolition of The WTC - by Dimitri Khalezov (Mike Harari details) The Destruction - Part 1/2 - YouTube The Destruction - Part 2/2 - YouTube 911-dimitri-interview-review-redeux-v2 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! "Do right by Free Planet," is the only rule.: DMITRI KHALEZOV'S CASE FOR A NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF WTC 1, 2 and 7 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2) - ZOCIAL.tv 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full) - ZOCIAL.tv 911 Debunking the Debunkers Dimitri Khalezov vs Famous Physicist Jan Zeman Blogger: The Vatic Project - Post a Comment Morgan Reynolds The Excavator: Russian Whistleblower Dimitri Khalezov Says U.S. And Russia Are Framing Former Russian Military Officer Viktor Bout 911thology (Dimitri Khalezov) < Video Playlist | Embedr Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition - Full playlist : Terror & 9/11 Part 1 1. Starts off with giving background on Dimitri Khalezov. 2. Show chart from FBI that shows Dimitri is on a terror list of some sort 3. Talks about him being arrested for supplying passport in Bali Bombing…denies charge, never been convicted. Part 2 1. Talks about aluminum cannot penetrate steel structure. Even with speed. 2. Talks about ‘live’ delay of 17 seconds or so, that aided in TV fakery, and how only one video of plane striking and later on more tapes came forward of the second plane, but nothing live, everything is courtesy of someone else. 3. Show screen captures form supposed same camera that has different background colors, and the black frames. 4. Talks about penetrating capabilities of the planes and why they would not penetrate the towers. 5. Talks about how plane should have struck the outside of the building and instead of going in the building it would have been crumpled or broken up and fall to the street below. 6. Talks about the video of the plane that the nose supposedly came out the side, and also that the angle that the plane was supposed to have hit would not match up with the nose coming out even if it was possible, the angle does not match with the actual angle of impact. 7. Talks about TV fakery…..best evidence is from helicopter journalist who is looking directly at WTC when 2nd plane supposedly hits….People in the studio keep saying they saw a plane…the person on the ground level keeps saying he saw no plane and that it just exploded…the people in the studio tell him it came from the side he wasn’t looking at….absurd, then repeats it several time…..it just exploded. Part 3 1. Shows different footage of second plane coming in that the angle of the plane coming in do not match from one video to another, some have it coming in at one angle and others have it coming at other angles. Says this points to digital manipulation. 2. Talks about the form of impact hole. Says that it does not match up with a plane

hitting there. 3. Talks about why the 9/11 commission had to report what they did. They had to invent a cover up story……this is explained why later in the interview. 4. Talks about the official story, jet fuel, weakened steel, collapse…..and why it isn’t true. Show the people standing in the impact hole, and if tower was burning hot enough to compromise the steel how was this woman, and others standing there holding on to steel beams? 5. Talks about the jet fuel having been mostly burned off at impact….if there was an impact….maybe jet fuel was also planted with the bombs. ------------------ not exactly so. I said in context of discussion that the fuel should have burn out by the time of the Tower’s collapse. The interviewer said that IF there WERE planes? I answered – that it does not matter in this case – if it were planes, or the kerosene was simply brought in the Tower in barrels, irrespectively of the mode of its delivery, it should have been burned out by the time. That’s what I meant. 6. Pentagon was attacked by a Russian Granient Missile (not sure of spelling). Shows trajectory of missile to the pentagon. ---------------- Granit (or Granite) or P-700 missile. You can check that one in Wikipedia. 7. Talks about how a plane could not make the maneuver it was claimed to have….only a missile could have. 8. Says missile would have been launched from Atlantic Ocean….probably 200 to 300 miles out. 9. Says actions of US military prove that attack came from Atlantic because when jets were scrambled they were sent in the direction of the Atlantic. 10. Says missile would be 7 tons and very thick. Flying tank. Speed over 2.5 mach. 11. Exit hole is good evidence of missile. ----------------------- add here that I said that it was an antiship missile, because the way it behaved (attempted to strike the Pentagon at the waterline level) is a typical behavior of antiship missiles. Part 4 1. Says the warhead on the missile would be half megaton thermonuclear warhead. 2. Says mechanics of attack and actions of the military prove it was a missile fired from a ship in the Atlantic. 3. Talks about knowledge of nuclear demolition scheme in the Soviet Union, says he found out in 1994, that the WTC had the nuclear demolition feature. Purpose was because building code of NYC and Chicago in the 60’s would not allow skyscrapers to be built unless the designer also submitted a plan to demolish the building in case it was ever necessary in the future. Side note….this actually makes sense to me from a codes standpoint. If you’re going to build it you also have to tell us how you plan to bring it down. Seems logical to me. 4. Talks about how in the 60’s it was more acceptable to use nuclear reactions for civil reasons….power and such….so it is not so farfetched to think that the building codes people would accept this option….it was a demolition option and nothing more…..in the 60’s people didn’t look at nuclear devices like we do now. 5. Talks about how crazy an idea this is, and that in Russia at the time it was a joke of sorts. 6. Talks about a Treaty between US and Russia for peaceful nuclear explosions. And what they are sometimes used for and why we would have such a treaty. 7. Talks of controversy in the 80’s when someone found blueprints of the WTC and it showed the plans for the nuclear demolition option and this person took it to the press. Side note …. I wander if anyone else remembers this at all or if there is any proof of it. ----------------------- yes, they do. I encounter people quite recently, who also recollected this scandal. There was an argument over removal my article on nuclear demolition (not the WTC, but in general) from the Wikipedia and during heated argument I mentioned this particular point to my opponents. One guy from among the opponents also said that know he could also recollect that in the 80s or so there was some discussion on this topic in some US newspapers. Part 5 1. Talks about conversations between Putin and Condie Rice on the morning of 9/11 during the attacks…about a Russian missile, the missile that hit the pentagon. This missile had a nuclear warhead that did not explode…..Side note….this part not explained very well. -------------------- yes, I think that was really the fault of the interviewer – he should have asked why? Then I will answer that the perpetrators intentionally rendered its detonator useless, because it was not their plan – to level Washington DC with a half-megaton explosion. But, at least, I explained it to you personally now. 2. ‘Doomsday’ plane – plane seen flying over White House….never explained officially. White House was evacuated … reported military aircraft but classified. Pentagon insists it is not a military aircraft…no mention in commission report. 3. 6:08 stamp…says US government had no involvement in attacks…was only a victim. 4. Say doomsday plane was sent up to keep government operating…..as its was designed to do….was designed because of nuclear war. Interesting. --------------------------- I think I explained it clearly enough in the video. Perhaps, you simply missed the point. The Doomsday plane is a flying command post designed to direct a retaliatory nuclear strike against the Soviet Union, should the latter

send its nuclear missiles first and damage stationary U.S. command posts designed to direct such a retaliatory nuclear strike. In case of a nuclear alert all 4 Doomsday planes in various locations of the U.S. must be scrambled at once in a couple of minutes time after receiving a notification of an upcoming nuclear attack against the United States. In no other case they may fly, unless for training/routing checking of their combat readiness only. By the way – strikingly ‘white’ color of this plane is nothing else than the so-called ‘anti-flush white’ designed to protect this aircraft as much as possible from being damaged by thermal radiations of multiple nuclear explosions. It is really a ‘Doomsday plane’ in the full sense of this word. 5. Talks about underground bunker – atomic bunker…talks about how Cheney and Rice and Speaker of the House was ordered to bunker. Says that missile that hit pentagon was supposed to be nuclear and was but did not go off. ---------------------again you missed the point. Cheney and Rice were simply grabbed by the Secret Service agents who broke into their offices and grabbed them both by their hands and by the trousers’ belt (not sure what it was in case of Rice, since she is a woman), nearly lifting them from the ground, and quickly propelled them both downstairs towards the anti-atomic bunker under the White House. So, because of this quick action both – Cheney and Rice have about an extra minute to get to the bunker before the explosion due to occur. In case of the Speaker, he was approached by the Secret Service agents and ordered to run to a helicopter to be urgently re-located to another anti-atomic bunker outside D.C. However, due to that action should take about 4-5 minutes, he would have no chance to survive – because about the time he was leaving the White House and running to the helicopter pad, the missile struck the Pentagon and supposed to produce a half-megaton nuclear explosion. 6. Tries to explain why doomsday plane has played a part in people saying the US was involved in the initial attacks and not just a cover up of certain events afterwards but failed to realize they were not a part of the attack but the US knew we were under nuclear attack and the government needed to move the skies in order to ensure the government would remain operating during and after a nuclear attack. ----------------------- this point you got well, but it appears to me that I didn’t talk about this particular. But this is true what you say. The skies were cleared not because of planes hijackings, but because of nuclear attack. No doubt. 7. Talks about underground bunker and how the door has supposedly never been closed was closed that day with the government people inside. Cheney and Rice were here and speaker of the house was ordered to another atomic bunker somewhere else because not all officials can be in the same secure location at once. ----------------------- again you missed the point. Cheney and Rice hid into an anti-atomic bunker under the White House. Speaker was flown into another anti-atomic bunker – outside D.C. However, the steel anti-atomic door that has never been closed in US history, except on the 9/11, with photo of it shown in that part of the movie, was of neither of the above anti-atomic bunkers. This is the door leading to the protected NORAD’s command post located inside ‘anti-atomic’ Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado. Upon getting notification of upcoming nuclear attack, the then commander of NORAD, Gen. Ralf Eberhart, immediately left his peace-time unprotected command post and moved to his protected command post 12 miles away (he drove by car and unlikely had chance to survive would the real nuclear strike occur at that time) but in any case once he arrived there he ordered to close that door – and that happened for the first time in US history. Part 6 1. Talks about Fireman had no fear of collapse because they knew that the building would not collapse….needed assistance to get people out … but fires could be contained and put out. Plus the fact that fireman know that steel building do not collapse from fire, or planes hitting them. 2. Says WTC’s were ‘pulled’ by nuclear option because of fear of collapse by government after planes hit. Talks about how when he was investigating that the conclusion was that the US brought down the towers out of fear of collapse….but was informed that that wasn’t the case because either type of collapse would have done about the same damage….this discovery is what lead to most of the rest of the discovery’s. He set out to prove that the building were brought down by nuclear demolition because of knowledge he had from his position in the Russian military from years ago ---------------------------- you missed the point. Because of my knowledge from military service I knew of the fact the nuclear demolition scheme did exist, but not of the fact that it was actually put to use on the 9/11 ----------, he did that….and then found out about the missing missiles and all the rest mostly as afterthought to his original plan. FBI received info that 3 nuclear warheads were used against US -------------- + info that 2 warheads were allegedly hidden inside the planes that stuck the Twin

Towers (or hidden in whatever else that struck the Towers, because as you could notice I am a ‘no-planes’ man, and I guess the FBI follows the ‘no-planes’ version too, at least for their internal work) ----------. In order to avoid an atmospheric nuclear explosion that would have killed millions they brought the buildings down using our own secret nuclear demolition plan for the towers….this is what needed to be hidden along with the fact that 24 Russian missiles with nuclear warheads were missing. ---------------------- 22, not 24. Besides it was different issues – a headache to hide loss of the missiles was the headache of the Russians, not of the Americans. Americans had some headache of their own. 3. Says FBI explanation is that 3 nuclear warheads were aim at US that day…1 one each plane that hit towers and 1 in the missile that hit pentagon. Says that the nuclear underground detonation was ordered because of fear that nukes at top of towers would go off and that would be much more catastrophic than using the built in nuclear demolition option. 4. Reason given that is that atmospheric atomic explosion is more contaminous and destructive than underground detonation. 5. Say if exploded at top would have destroyed Manhattan. ------------- entire New York, not Manhattan. It is half megaton (given that Hiroshima bomb was less than 20 kiloton you can imagine what 500 kiloton is and how much it would destroy). 6. Say FBI says that he is correct about nuclear detonation, but he is incorrect on conclusion of why they brought down towers. 7. Shows news coverage of reporter talking … 3 mins after 2 second explosion…..about how the fire chief of safety – Albert Turi -had told him how many firemen were in the building at the time and of explosions after the impact…..says fire chief thinks first explosion after impact was planted on plane..and second explosion after impact was planted in the building. --------------- what was planted in the plane was “secondary device” as he called it, not ‘explosion’, and the very same kind of “secondary device” was planted in the building, according to Turi. 8. Live news footage from CNN that shows banner headline at 1003am saying “third explosion shatters world trade center in New York” 9. Show CNN banner about Sears Tower in Chicago being evacuated…mentions to notice that Empire State Building was not being evacuated --side personal note….empire state building was evacuated sometime between 945am and 1005a….I know this personally because I was working in that building on the 13th floor and descended the stairs to the street to 5th avenue and 33rd st. … and we watch the tower fall from that vantage point at roughly 1013am…I don’t know what the point of mentioning that about the Empire State building really….because honestly everyone at that point had evacuated the tall high rise buildings on their own accord if not ordered to do so….I think he is tying in the fact that the sears tower supposedly has the nuclear demolition option as well….thats why they were evacuated. ---------------------- you did not miss the point, but perhaps you have wrongly interpreted it. The Sears Tower was evacuated because of some CENTRALIZED order, transmitted via channels of Civil Defense system. This was an EVENT. Evacuation of the rest of the building was just a gesture of a good will by their respective owners, perhaps after consultation with local security specialists. It can’t be considered as an EVENT in the abovementioned sense. See the difference? 10. At 1013am Breaking CNN news is that the third explosion has collapsed the first tower (but second tower hit) Part 7 1. Says it is not correct to use term nuclear weapon… weapons are designed to kill people this was a nuclear demolition device … but he does say ‘still it was a nuclear device’ 2. He goes on to talk about how the device would have worked….he wrote an article for Wiki on how to demolish using nuclear device….he didn’t mention WTC … but article was still taken down. 3. He goes on to detail about the nuclear process …. http://www.nuclear-demolition-wikipedia.com 4. Start explanation at 2:43 mark….. 5. Explains difference between atmospheric explosion and underground explosion. Part 8 1. Cont. from atmospheric and underground nuclear explosion explanation of differences. 2. Discusses how much nuclear force needed to destroy amounts of bedrock. 3. Talks about largest allowed was 150 kiloton was maximum allowed under nuclear demolition treaty talked about in earlier part. 4. Talks about how Russians used nuclear underground detonation to form I think he said ‘glass holes’….but could not make out exactly. ------------------------------ gas holders underground. To keep gas under pressure, because volcanic glass coating walls of underground cavity makes it very useful for that purpose. Part 9 1. Cont. to discuss specifics of what would happen to the blast area underground. 2. Goes into talk about blast waves and why there would have been none and why people on the surface would not be injured by the blast. 3. Talks about radioactive gases escaping to surface eventually…and why tests are done in remote places. 4. Talks about how some radioactive

particles would be filtered out by the time it reaches surface and says could still get radioactive exposure for two weeks after from an atomic underground blast at 500m underground with a 150 kiloton nuclear device. Says that the epicenter would continue to be radioactive for … deadly radioactive for 3 years. Says the epicenter would stay hot for 1 year with a 150kiloton device. 5. Points out why the underground nuclear explosion is not comparable to Hiroshima. 6. Points out that example given are for typical underground devices for test…. 7. Starts to go into details about specifics of WTC nuclear demolition. 8. Says for WTC would be 50m under the tower foundation…explained in a min later that because of basements of 27m that the device would have been placed 77m from the ground surface. 9. This would make tower lose its foundation and thus melt the steel of the foundation and bring down everything above. Part 10 1. Talks about how we would not hear anything on the surface when it was detonated, but would feel the ground shake. 2. Richter scale measurement chart displayed…..5.5 on scale is a 80 kiloton explosion equivalent 3. Displays quote of Battalion Chief Brian O’Flaherty who says of being in the Marriott Hotel “I hear a noise. Right after that noise, you could feel the building start to shudder, tremble, under your feet” then the tower came down. 4. Shows Clip of tower shaking before the collapse….its the 12 second video that is focused on the damage zone….anyone who know 9/11 truth or otherwise has seen it….camera is on tripod….frames shake for several seconds and 10 seconds later the tower is crumbling. 5. Goes into details of how the damage would have been created by the blast zone expanding.. 6. Damage zone – up to 350 meters from ground surface….says building would be damaged or broken up into smaller pieces. 7. Immediately after that up to 300m from ground and everything in that zone would be turned to microscopic dust. 8. This is explaining why there was little left of the towers the only part that would not have been affected by the blast is the very upper floors, about ? of the towers…everything else was reduced to dust. Part 11 1. Shows a good graphic to explain part 10 of actual damaged tower and what zones would have been turned to what and why the collapse looks like it did because of the way the towers were affected by nuclear device. 2. 2:55 mark discusses why they call it ground zero – ‘the place on the earth’s surface directly at, below, or above the explosion of a nuclear bomb. The American Heritage Desk Dictionary (edition 1981) Side note – merrian-webster still defines it this way as definition number one. [link to dictionary.merriam-webster.com] -------------------- however, this one added also a definition No.2 to dilute the clear original meaning. Before the 9/11 it was one single meaning. 3. Shows example of how new dictionaries have changed the definition of the ground zero since 9/11. Uses Logan’s dictionary, I have never heard of them, but it is a real example. ---------------- not Logan, but Longman – it is a very famous dictionary company. About as famous as Webster or Oxford and perhaps more famous than the American Heritage. I am very surprised that you have never heard of it. 4. Talks about how the definitions were changed after ward to talk about bombs and severe damage as to not remind people of its real pre-9/11 meaning. 5. Talks about why the dust would not be radioactive. 8:20 mark. In atmosphere dust would become radioactive but not underground because it’s the pressure of the nuclear device that turned the materials to dust not radiation blast. Part 12 1. Explains how radioactive vapors escaped after the collapse and the vapors that continued after the blast for several weeks was radioactive. 2. Shows pictures of Fireman looking in the hole with the vapors coming out, and that they breathed it in and also had direct contact -------------------- not direct contact by were subjected to direct radiation --------. Says health problems would arise, will talk about that in further parts. 3. Says most of the dust was steel dust, and the rest would be concrete, office materials, wires, and people, but the majority of the towers were steel and that was the major component of the dust. 4. Goes into temperatures….150 kiloton at 500m would take one year to cool, talks about vapors coming out 6-8 weeks later and is still red hot, 3 months later finding molten steel in the debris. 5. Discredits thermite theory. Thermite could not sustain the high temps, and cannot turn steel to dust. 6. Ask why more experts haven’t come out to question commission report. Explanation is that it is physiological. Part 13 1. Talks about why people of knowledge agree to official story, even though they know from education that events could not have happened from plane crashes. 2. The Second ‘truth’ about 9/11 – explanation given to experts who question 9/11 … all the 3 wtc buildings have been demolished by ‘alqueda’using 3 stolen soviet made portable nuclear devices RA-115/Ra-116 (aka ‘mini nukes’) which the ‘alqaeda’ had planted into the 3 wtc buildings in advance. 3. Show quotes from Spanish article about how 3 mini

nukes were used to destroy the wtc towers including tower 7….thus blaming even tower 7 on bin laden, and not from damage from debris from the twin towers. 4. The 9/11 commission was advised to not report this to the people because of fear of public panic over mini nukes. Russia was said to have made 700 suitcase nukes and 100 were missing. The ones that the bin laden supposedly used were gotten from the Ukraine, according to this interview. ----------------- not according to my interview, but according to Spanish “El Mundo” newspaper, article “Mi Hermano Bin Laden, Tragedia, Apocalipsis, New York” of 16 Sept 2001. 5. Says that the US had to use the built in demolition option to bring down the towers because they were given info that the planes carried nukes that would detonate at the top of the towers, and the atmospheric blast would have destroyed Mahattan and surrounding and they really had no choice. Remember from earlier he says the US is a victim in 9/11 but because of public fear of the suitcase nuke they had to cover the real story. Basically. 6. Talking about why firefighters would allow for a cover up. If nukes went off at top of building millions would have been killed. The firefighters, etc had to go with it, and the truth is only top officials would have even know of the nuclear option. 7. Says thousands of people would have to keep secret. 8. Talks about disagreements amongst experts …. Paid experts and non paid. Part 14 1. Talks about materials being shipped out without examination for investigation….partly out of radiation concerns. ----------------------------- not in this sense, but in a sense as to prevent any independent study of the materials that could reveal radioactivity. 2. 1:25 starts to talk about WTC 7 and its collapse and omission from Commission report. 3. Starts explanation of why WTC 7 collapse would look different from the twin towers. 4. Explains blast zone and because 7 was smaller the dust zone reached to the top of WTC 7, so it did not have the top damage zone that the blast would create. 5. Shows BBC live footage were the reporter says he has reports that the Solomon (sp? WTC7) has collapsed….this is not the famous footage of the women with WTC 7 behind her and the feed is lost, this is voice over from the male anchor in studio over live footage of Collapse areas. ---------- yes, this is indeed a different footage than the one with the woman, because the one with the woman would be at 5.07 PM EST, while this one was aired at 4.56 PM EST. By the way – woman also called the WTC-7 as “Salomon Brothers Building” in that famous clip you mentioned. 6. Give report of warning from British foreign office to British citizens that there is a ‘strong risk of further atrocities in NYC.’ 24 mins after this is when the building actually collapsed. ---------------------- side note “atrocity” and “atrocious device” are jargon words in secret services’ jargon that are actually mean “mini-nuclear bombing” (usually reported to plebs as “truck-bombing” or “car-bombing” – like the one in Oklahoma or in Kenya and Tanzania cases), while “atrocious device” usually refers to a “mini-nuke” in the same jargon. It is just for you own reference. Just in case. 7. Says WTC 7 housed the nuclear devices that were used to demolish all three. 8. Tunnels from WTC 7 to 1 and 2 would be how the devices were delivered for detonation. 9. Explains why first collapse was of second hit tower and second collapse was by first hit tower. 10. Shows map of WTC complex… explains that WTC 2 is farther from WTC 7 and if they would have collapsed WTC 1 first then the blast wave for WTC 1 would have destroyed the tunnel over to WTC 2 from building 7. So tower 2 had to come down first, because had tower 1 come down first….tower 2 would probably still be standing today. 11. WTC 7 was destroyed because if it wasn’t then it would have been discovered about the nuclear demolition option for skyscrapers that was put into place decades earlier. The public couldn’t find out about nukes being used for demolition. 12. Concludes that the US is reacting to an attack and in response to that attack does something it needs to cover up (nuclear demolition of skyscraper, with people still in them btw, to save nuclear detonation in skyscraper that would get into the atmosphere and kill millions). Part 15 1. Why cover it up? The American people would not accept that killing 3000 people in order to save millions was acceptable. That could never be revealed to the public, even if it was done to protect millions. -------------------------------------- I did not mean this. In fact, the American public perhaps WOULD accept that it is better to kill the 3000 than to let be killed 6 million, because it is simply reasonable and the American public is not so devoid of any reason as might appear. I meant not this. I meant that the American public would never accept an idea that the nuclear devices did under the Twin Towers in the first instance. Because of bureaucrats from the Department of Buildings and because of stupid clause in the building code? That what I meant. 2. Why then create 2 wars over the cover up? Explanation given by me….Rahm Emmanuel I believe said ‘you can never let a disaster go to waste’ or

something to that effect. --------------------- in fact, I explained why the wars should have taken place. In order to distract public attention from nuclear explosion in Manhattan to something else (wars). And I put an example – after the nuclear explosion in Beirut in 1983 (for plebs referred to as a “truck-bombing” of Beirut Marine barracks), the very next day the US Government launched Grenada invasion – just to distract the public attention from the nuclear blast in Beirut towards occupation of Grenada. But that one was a small mini-nuke explosion, so the war was smaller. Here were 3x 150 kiloton explosions, so wars should be bigger in scale – to distract public attention appropriately. That what I meant to say. 3. Says WTC 7 was destroyed because it was the base of operation (and housed the devices) that would deploy the nuke device if it was ever needed, it was destroyed to hide that fact and that fact alone. The fact that Secret Service and many other government buildings were housed there is just a coincidence. 4. Talks about alarm system that should be in place for this nuclear demolition option that should have been deployed that morning was disabled. Mentions a timeline that should take place from when the device are put in place and detonation. 5. Side note…..the above point is not clear on the time line…and an interesting video edit is made right after Dimitri says he thinks that that part of the demolition is a conspiracy…and then edit. ----------------------------------------- there was a special alarm system based on WTC-7 that was designed to produce alarm signals towards the WTC-1 and -2 should the nuclear demolition scheme of the Twins become activated (to my knowledge there should be at least 20 minutes, perhaps even 25 minutes, between the press of the Red Button and till the time of actual nuclear explosion. So, all this time some continuous alarm signal should have been transmitted towards the dangerous areas urging everyone immediately to get out. This system for some not so-clear reason was put in “test mode” very early in the morning of the 9/11 and so all signals produced by it (if any at all) should have been ignored. That is official information. So, when he asked me why would they disable the alarm system, I answered that in my opinion it was some kind of conspiracy. I didn’t’ specify, but I think that Larry Silverstein was a part of the 9/11 gang from the very beginning and it was his order to disable the alarm system. However, I don’t have any proof of it. It is only a suspicion. So, I say it is in my opinion only. 6. Talks of damage to a building behind WTC 7, Fiterman Hall, because of where the nuke device would have been placed because of the shape of WTC7, shows Google search and link that says that this building is being decontaminated. Then another that shows the building was demolished. Shows quotes from article about the building, EPA ‘Fiterman’s got to go’. 7. Explains why post office and Verizon on either side of WTC7 were not damaged…because of placement of device and blast zone. 8. Show where he believes nuke charges would have been placed under WTC 1 and 2 9. Explains why some of the corner structures seemed to have ‘survived’. Part 16 1. Explains why damage would look like it did based on location of device. 2. Explains why the blast wave only affected the structure and didn’t produce and ‘outside’ blast wave. 3. Gives example of another French scientist who gave same equations he did about blast waves, but they differed on why and how….but the calculations were the same for the damage. 4. French scientist says that there was a nuclear reactor under the WTC complex…this is where the two men disagree, Dimitri and the French Scientist. 5. Shows article from 3 Dec. 2001, 12 weeks after, that says Deputy Chief Charles Biaich of New York Fire Department would not predict when the last fire might be extinguished. 6. Says same hotspots were found under WTC 7 7. Talks about the way the fires were extinguished in WTC1 and 2 were the same that had to be used to put out WTC 7 underground fires weeks later, says this proves that all 3 were brought down by the same method. ---------------------- also in the same interview with Blaich it is said that underground fires were not typical and represented a mass of mixed combustible materials as deep as 50 meters. Very important point that you have missed. Also you missed the point that in the same interview it was said that two apparent radioactivity absorbents were mixed into waters of firefighters and used to extinguish ‘underground fires’ under spots of the WTC -1, -2 and… -7. Part 17 1. Starts off with report from Pentagon where reporter is talking about small debris, and the collapse of the wall that happened 45 mins later. ----------------------------- in this interview, in fact, the CNN reporter clearly explains that there was no plane in the Pentagon’s case. Very clear. 2. Goes into Russian missile he says is used for pentagon attack. 3. Says Russian officials new missiles had been stolen but had to cover that up. ------- you perhaps mean “knew”, not ‘new’. 4. Talks about missing submarine, also, im having trouble following this part and how it is all a part of this. I guess it background on where the missiles

came from….. 5. Shows article about nuclear powered vessel ‘Kursk’ and test it conducted with firing them. ------------- it seems that you completely missed my point here. What I meant that after salvaging the sunken submarine, the Russian officials made a kind of ‘production’ by claiming that missiles’ silos can not be opened, because it was allegedly too dangerous – just in order to hide the fact that the missiles were no longer in their silos and the silos were empty. Then the Russians proceeded to cutting the silos ‘as is’ from the body of the submarine using welding and then, without opening the empty silos, brought them to some remote location and destroyed them with mini-nukes without opening – so to hide completely the fact that the missiles were stolen. Two Russian newspapers articles (with English translation of both) are provided that confirm this seemingly insane claim. Part 18 1. Talking about the missing Russian missiles, 22 or 24 total, interviewer asking what they are doing with the, he says breaking them down possibly because uranium and plutonium are very valuable, or expensive. -------------------------- the matter of expensive nuclear materials arises because of the question whether it would be reasonable to destroy the missiles and their warheads by ‘mini-nuking’ them, instead of disassembling and finding some other good use of the expensive nuclear materials inside the warheads. It seems you again completely missed the point. 2. Side note….i still am confused about who stole or acquired the Russian missiles, and who actually deployed them against the US. I am following why he thinks its is underground nukes, but after 180 mins or so, I sure be clear on WHO attacked us….if it wasn’t a self inflicted wound, was it the Russians? ---------------------- I didn’t mention it in the interview, but only mentioned that it was not he Americans. But for you personally I can tell who it was. It was the Freemasons in collaboration with the Israeli Mossad. 3. Talking about the missile test from the Kurst was to cover up the fact that 20 some Russian missiles were missing. 22 were missing, 1 was used on the pentagon, and that leaves 20 missing missiles with 500kiloton nuclear warheads on them. They are saying the US gov’t knew this because Russia had told them under the nuclear agreements. ----------------------- no, I have never said that the Russians confessed to the Americans that the missile that stuck the Pentagon was stolen from Kursk. To the best of my knowledge until today the official interpretation of events is still different than my claims. The Russian claim (secretly of course) that these Granit missiles were stolen by some bad Russian guy from Ukrainian warehouse of the Black Sea Fleet and sold to Saddam Hussein. In fact, my claims about Kursk affair are extremely embarrassing for both – the Russians and the Americans, because they knock down the already established version of the ‘truth’. 4. Talking about how he has given all this info to the government and no one has even ask him anything, reason he says is because they already know it all. Says he is prepared to go to court and prove his position about 9/11 and the missing missiles that are caring the massive nuclear warheads. 5. This is where a cover up comes into play. If the US knows this information and is not letting the public know. He is saying that the higher ups are not allowing the grunts to investigate his truthful claims because if they do they would discover what he has discovered. 6. The interviewer says he believes that the US is ignoring his claims because the US knows he is correct AND that the US isn’t worried about the missing 20 missiles because we know where they are. Part 19 1. Talking about why Americans or others can’t buy that it is a nuclear device because there was no mushroom cloud, or massive reading of radiation. People expect Hiroshima when they hear about nuclear detonation, but that is above ground. The nuclear detonation is different above ground. 2. They go into the timeframe of first impact, second impact, pentagon strike, and that a decision had to be made very quickly for the nuclear demolition, Dimitri says this does fit the time line because the US knows of the missing missiles and the possibility of nuclear detonation in the atmosphere so they decided very quickly to use the demolition option that was built in. 3. Side note….Dimitri says the US was absolutely certain that the planes had the mini nukes on them….-------------------- not ‘mini-nukes’ but 500 kiloton thermo-nuclear warheads, akin to that found in the Pentagon ------------------also much earlier it was discussed that planes could not ‘penetrate’ the WTC towers and cut threw them like butter, they should have impacted and basically fallen to the ground…..i remember the videos that show the plane that possibly had the ‘pod’ under it that makes a flash a micro second before it impacted…..maybe it had to shoot the device into the building because otherwise it would have fallen to the street level, most likely. ------------- yes, but this is MY PERSONSL opinion that planes were digital. However, at the 9/11 an OFFICIAL version of events was that there were planes (or missiles if not planes) that struck the

WTC. So, for the FBI by then it sounded reasonable. Now, perhaps, they realized already it was just BS, but it is simply to late to change the story now. 4. Shows clip of news report about safety Chief Albert Turi about devices planted in the building. 5. Says this confirms that they were aware of bombs on the plane….and in the tower, because they knew of the nuclear demolition option. 6. Side note – Dimitri says earlier that he believes the TV fakery angle as well, or evidence points to it, and possibly no planes at all, because there is evidence of that, like it or not, but now he talks about how the safety chief saying he believes the planes had bombs and the building had pre planted bombs…doesn’t that contradict itself? I am a little confused on the stance here…..and how those could both be true, TV fakery and bombs on the plane. ------------------- no, it does not contradict. Because it is MY PERSONAL opinion that there were no planes (and no warheads either). However, in opinion of the FBI officials then there were both – ‘planes’ and ‘warheads’ (another version – missiles, instead of planes, and warheads). It is simply because my personal opinion (as of today) is very different from the contemporary FBI opinion (as of the September the 11). 7. Goes back to Sears’s tower being evacuated and other events around 835 and beyond. 8. They are talking about the sears tower being ordered evacuated at 1002a, 3 mins after the first collapse. They say the Empire State Building and Trump Towers and other building were not evacuated. This is not true, I know for a fact. I worked in the Empire State Building on 9/11 on the 13th floor facing the twin towers. I stated this above. Sometime around 940 am the building was ordered evacuated. An announcement came over the intercom that was building wide and said that everyone should evacuate the building…I believe it mentioned it was ok to use elevators, because I chose the stairs. I did not evacuate immediately, me and a co-worker stayed for a few mins longer and the announcement was made again..we then took the stairs to the lobby where everyone from our office met in the intersection….the middle of the road….5th ave. and 33rd st. We could see the tops of the twin towers and after being there for not long…ten or fifteen mins the first tower came down…we could see the smoke rushing down the streets..even from that far away. So I don’t know why they have mentioned this twice already, but it is not true, at least for the empire state building. It may not have made the news crawl but we were ordered evacuated. And actually the building was closed the next day…and for 2 weeks after that we were evacuated several times for bomb scares. ------------------------ and again, you have to distinguish by the scale of these events. Evacuation of the Empire State building was a local matter. Evacuation of the Sears Tower – by the centralized order, transmitted by channels of the civil defense system. See the difference? Just to make it easier to understand – in the 9/11 there were actually 2 distinctly different orders to ground all aircraft. One – by orders of respective airlines flight dispatchers (local matter) – because of fear of hijackings. The other – centralized order by the NORAD (centralized command SCATANA) – because of necessity to immediately clear all skies because of atomic alert and expectation of massive arrival of enemy missiles and enemy aircraft. That is about the same huge difference between the order to evacuate the Sears Tower and the order to evacuate the Empire State Building. While the second one was evacuated merely because of fear of possible terror actions, the first one was evacuated clearly in connection with implementation of a nuclear demolition scheme of the WTC. Hope, you realize how huge is the difference between these two events. 9. Saying that Sear’s tower was evacuated because it had the same built in design of nuclear demolition and they had to evacuate just in case it was also a target, to save lives. Again, this contradicts the TV fakery, unless there were pre planted bombs in the tower that were not nuclear that started the event, and to explain that they added the planes so mentally people would be able to handle the towers coming down. Unfortunately people are ignorant and they assume that a plane hitting a building would bring it down, its easy to deceive ignorant people. But I am still confused about how the TV fakery can also mesh with the bombs on the planes, etc. ------------------ no, it does not contradict that. It was simply because it was so awful thing to do – to nuke the Tower with life beings still in it, that no normal person would allow other live beings to continue to remain in the Sears Tower with a similar 150 kiloton nuke underneath it just because no plane yet hit the Sears Tower. Just think about it from this point of view. 10. Says he knows from his work experience that the twin towers for sure had the nuclear demolition option and heard rumors that the sears tower did as well, and on Sept. 11 when it was evacuated that is when he knew, because they were afraid that the sears tower was a target that day as well, thus they evacuated it in case they needed to bring it down. Side

note…seems like they waited a long time to evacuate, when the first tower came down, if they knew they were a target because of the nuclear demolition option. ----------------- about the last I can ‘t comment, because I don’t know. Part 20 1. Talking about other government having known a nuclear device went off based on seismic readings and knows how to interpret those reading. 2. Says that seismic readings are not that of the nuclear devices…..in short that it is bogus evidence that has been put out to distract or discredit the nuclear demolition theory. ------------------ no, probably, you missed the point. These bogus seismograms clearly represented two mini-nukes explosions (perhaps 1 kiloton each in underground parking lots) and as such this bogus evidence was depicted to represent the same story as published by the Spanish “El Mundo” newspaper – that the Twins were nuked by Osama bin Laden, using stolen Soviet mini-nukes. 3. Give quoted testimony of Bradley Mann, EMS, “Shortly before the first tower came down I remember feeling the ground shaking. I heard a terrible noise, and then the debris just started flying everywhere.’ 4. Says the seismic reading put out paired with the testimony of witnesses proves that the seismic reading are false because the ground wouldn’t shake at a 2.2 it would take a 5-5.5 for the ground to shake or rumble. 5. Give more quotes of ground shaking from Fire Patrolman Paul Curran 6. Shows what people feel from different seismic level and what forces can cause seismic reading other than natural earthquake…or what an earthquake’s equivalent man made force would be. Part 21 1. Going back to TV fakery….they show the video of the man on the street smoking and responding to the plane hitting the building. The question is ‘Is he reacting to the plane hitting or is he reacting simply to an explosion that did not involve a plane?’ I have to say even before the video slowed it down that has always been my reaction to him, he should have heard the plane coming in from that low well before he reacted. I know sound reaches us later than the event, but his reaction, to me, is that of only an explosion and no plane. 2. Shows live footage of witnesses who are questioning a reporter saying it was a plane, the witness says it was a bomb, the reporter who is also right there….says it was a plane ‘we saw it on tv’…..but the witness is adamant that it was a bomb. ------------- you missed the very first witness – a woman interviewed by Dick Oliver as shown by CNN, who clearly saw that the explosion was INSIDE, and she repeated it twice – INSIDE. Very important. 3. Shows footage of President Bush news conference talking about how explosives were designed to go off where people above could not escape…..this may be somewhat misleading. When he is referring to the explosive going off higher point to prevent from escaping….his use of explosive could be referring to the planes being used as explosive…..not sure how much credence that adds … but it doesn’t take any away. 4. Says that the original planes with the people on them were ditched in the ocean. ------------------ no, I said that the planes were empty of passengers, not full of them. 5. Shows footage again with a witness on the phone…the tv is showing a plane coming in toward the tower ..no one is reacting to seeing this incoming plane…then the fire ball, then everyone reacts, studio people and live witness on the phone, never a mention of an incoming plane….the person on the phone then starts saying the building just blew up, never mentioning a plane. He is then put on ‘pause’ according the in studio voice over. 6. The video points out that the ‘live’ shot from CNN indicates it is live by a red banner with the word LIVE in white capital letters…as the plane approaches the tower until the fireball the LIVE banner is there, then 12 frames (not seconds) of complete black screen, when the ‘live’ shot is returned the red ‘LIVE’ banner is now missing. When they come back to the ‘live’ feed the red banner is missing and replaced by a blue ‘LIVE’ banner. The middle missing ‘live’ banner may be because of a different camera being used….but when they return to the helicopter shot it appears to be from the original live shot with the red banner. This to me, as small as it is, says a lot. The devil is in the details. I know people hate the TV fakery part of this, and I don’t know why, all angles should be safe for discussion, but this is a small little smoking pistol to me in that argument. ---------------- thanks for noticing that. 7. Shows live footage from helicopter to the in studio people, Charles Gibson I believe by the voice, in studio they see a plane, the witness says he does not see a plane. Part 22 1. Talking about the Shanksville crash site….Dimitri says that 2 of the planes were shot down. I’m confused about which other plane was shot down. They are saying a lot about United reporting to planes down but not saying where. ----------------- I thought I made it clear – two planes were shot down – the one later assigned to the Pentagon and the Flight 93. Besides, I did not state that they were shot down, I said I suspect that they were shot down. 2. Talks about cell towers and about how mobile calls would not have been able from

high altitude flying planes. 3. Talks about why he knows the trade center were nuclear demolitions, but his main research was not on the plane or no plane theory. Just that the building were ultimately destroyed by the nuclear demolition. 4. Says United 93 was shot down by ‘cannon’ … I think they mean by bullets type projectiles and not missile type because US missile could not shoot down a friendly aircraft, it would have to be done by ‘cannon’. Side note….they may not be saying cannon, it is hard for me to tell. ----------- yes, what I meant was ‘cannon’. Part 23 1. Talking about hijackers and that some are alive and some have alibis, one was a Pakistan ISI agent, and one was a Christian. 2. Says that if the 9/11 commission is reporting these 19 hijackers are responsible then the entire commission is false because some of the named and pictured hijackers are alive. 3. Talks about the found passport, unburned and intact. 4. Talks about Pakistan ISI and the $100000 wire transfer and why the FBI didn’t look at ISI, considering the director was in the US during the attacks, he would have been easy to detain and question. --------- at least to question – even without detaining J 5. Talks again that the US was a victim put in a desperate situation that it then had to cover up. 6. Talks about how the US tried its best to tie Saddam Hussein and couldn’t. 7. Talks about how FBI has not evidence against bin laden. Only wanted for crimes outside the US which means he didn’t have anything to do with 9/11 Part 24 1. Talks about the blast crater and the temps again. What the hole would have been filled with since then. Side note – a problem I have with this nuclear theory is that the sub levels were not completely destroyed……the mall underground was intact for the most part. I think the Lauder Brothers movie showed footage of fireman walking around in the Mall area, and the Path station and subway station. If everything above ground was turned to dust from ground level to 300 meters up….why wasn’t the 27 meters of sub levels also turned to dust? Based on the graphics shown in the interviews everything from 27m underground up to 300 meters above ground should have been turned to dust….including the parking garages, mall, mechanical rooms, etc. But they weren’t why is that? ------------------------- note my drawing in regard to the destruction zone around the WTC-7 – where I explained that it slightly touched the Fitterman Hall, but spared both – Verizon and the U.S. Post Office – despite of them being dangerously close to the WTC-7. As you can see from that diagram, the nukes were quite precise and both nukes produced similar destruction zones around the Twins, sparing the rest of environment. I don’t see any contradiction at all. 2. Talking about what should be found underground. Saying if they dug underground that we would find ‘volcanic’ glass. Testing would show radioactivity. --------------------------------- but not the radioactivity of volcanic glass. Volcanic glass does not retain any atomic structure, nor radioactivity. It is former plasma now set solid. What might retain atomic structure and radioactivity – is former liquid materials, apart of plasma. I think you have to listen to that what I said again. 3. Talks about a NYC detective that contracted leukemia and had a bone marrow transplant. Bone marrow is the first part affected by radiation. He had worked at ground zero and freshkills landfill, an article written about him brings up question of why certain FBI agents would come dressed in full HazMat protection and everyone else had simple face masks. 4. Talks about some Dr.’s assigned to these cases would have to have signed a non disclosure agreement because they would know that these people had been exposed to radiation. Part 25 1. Talking about how people are subject to radiation and how long it would take for them to feel sick. Describes how much radiation it would take for it to affect you immediately or later on. 2. Talking about how the levels subsided over a few months. Explains how the body absorbs radiation and the government knew they needed to take measures to make sure people were not overexposed. 3. Talks about reports of radiation tests being done daily at ground zero….when workers would show levels above what they wanted he was removed from the pile and reassigned. 4. Says levels workers were exposed to would have taken some time to manifest into symptoms. Part 26 1. Talks about how Dr.’s would explain blood diseases and such as reactions from asbestos and other toxins from the office materials burning. 2. Talks about how there were not ‘fires’ underground, but extremely hot molten materials. 3. Says the vapors would continue to escape as long as the material was still hot. Once cooled the hole would have been filled with something to reduce any further seepage of radiation. 4. Talks about how residents would be affected…..but not as badly because they were kept away for six months. Side note – we don’t know the effects of residents, they are not tracked like the firefighters. 5. Talks about why Dr.’s should be able to know something was wrong because residents were coming with problems…but again Dr.’s would not look for radiation poisoning, but would

look for asbestos and other materials. 6. Talks about images of vapors from spaces….points out the hotspots where the detonation would have been placed and thermal images prove this. 7. Talks about other experts who came to same conclusion as him and they didn’t know what he knew about the nuclear demolition option. Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlistt21675.html#ixzz26CZWCjZj 9/11thology.cn - Third Truth about 9/11 re-directs backups.

Articles

back to top

Articles on the WTC Open Minds Forum - 9/11 Tower Pulverizations Explained - Nuked Facts not Fairies Parts 1-26 explained (excellent) Facts not Fairies Parts 1-26 explained (excellent) v2 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full) | Frequency 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2) | Frequency 911 Footage | See for yourself the coverage of 9/11 http://caspiansea.mihanblog.com/extrapage/grand1 http://caspiansea.mihanblog.com/extrapage/grand2 Anonymous Physicist Anonymous Physicist Author Of: The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath and Quarantine: Mankind Held Hostage: The Ultimate Truth of Hiroshima, 9/11 & Man’s History World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence World Trade Center Demolition World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist" Reality is Stranger Than Fiction: Dimitri Khalezov discusses 9/11 with George Mapp in Bangkok | Dobroyeutro's Blog http://tinyurl.com/3c3f9ve [video] Dimitri Khalezov - interview about 911 • Political Videos Forum • Smeggy's Forums • Thirdtruth Thread: 911 WTC Nuclear Demolition Part 1 & 2 at Conspiracy Theories Forum (ThreadID: 1600719) Joe O'Toole - wtc heat lasted for months The Great Deception -> * 3rd Theory Of What Happened On 911 Scribd Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff « eddieleaks.org This is zionism: Dimitri Khalezov's Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web! Mike Philbin's Free Planet blog: Nuked WTC's Dmitri Khalezov was on the NO PLANES band-wagon early. Banned From YouTube - Videos » 9/11thology

The Twin Towers and Building 7 - Nuclear Demolition Charges - Dimitri Khalezov 2of2 - Stagevu: Your View Statement of Dr. Peter Leitner before the Joint Economic Committee 9110502.PDF (application/pdf Object) 9110210.PDF (application/pdf Object) 9110129.PDF (application/pdf Object) Killtown: Banned at PrisonPlanet forum Killtown: Banned from Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11 | Veterans Today Dimitri Khalezov | Veterans Today Ground Zero | Veterans Today GORDON DUFF: 9/11 AND THE TWO STAGE “KHALEZOV EFFECT” | Veterans Today DIMITRI KHALEZOV: BIO-TERRORISM AND ANTHRAX | Veterans Today DIMITRI KHALEZOV: CHERNOBYL and MANHATTAN | Veterans Today Balancing the 9/11 Account- The Military | Veterans Today ll_0573.pdf (application/pdf Object) ll33of2007.pdf (application/pdf Object) -- See Local Law 33-2007 (See Title 27, Chapter 1 113.0 Art 14) NYC demolotion bylaw ... 9bee2e75.jpg (JPEG Image, 599x841 pixels) a77ac1ea.jpg (JPEG Image, 450x661 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) World Trade Center plowshar.pdf (application/pdf Object) elmundo_binladen.pdf (application/pdf Object) El Mundo - Mi hermano Bin Laden Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions – Re-edited This is zionism: Dimitri Khalezov's Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web! Blogger: This is zionism - Post a Comment The Third Truth by Dimitri Khalezov - 911thology Did Nukes Take down the twin towers and building 7 on 9-11? Uncensored Magazine | 911 ~ Gordon Duff Interviews Dimitri Khalezov 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE ***** - Page 34

Dimitri Links

back to top

Dimitri_Khalezov - index of all files Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned officer of the so-called “military unit 46179”, otherwise known as “the Special Control Service” of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control Service, also known as the Soviet atomic (later “nuclear”) intelligence was a secret military unit responsible for detecting of nuclear explosions (including underground nuclear tests) of various adversaries of the former USSR as well as responsible for controlling of observance of various international treaties related to nuclear testing and to peaceful nuclear explosions. After September the 11th Khalezov undertook some extensive 9/11 research and proved that the Twin Towers of World Trade Center as well as its building 7 were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions – which earned the very

name “ground zero” to the demolition site. Moreover, he testifies that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” of the Twin Towers as long ago as back in the ‘80s – while being a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service. 3rd_truth_book_dimitri_khalezov_presentation_jn_1.wmv (video/x-ms-wmv Object) !_Debunking_the_debunkers-_famous_physicist_Jan_Zeman_vs_infamous_impostor_Dimitri_Khalezov.pdf Welcome to the personal web site of Dimitri A. Khalezov. The 3rd Truth about 9/11 Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov ( in Russian: ??????? ?????????? ??????? ), an author of: "The Third Truth about September 11.." research book, could be contacted as follows: Directly (preferable): telephone in Bangkok , Thailand: +6685-1230760; +668-05960711; +662-776039451 or by E-mail: dkhalezov(a)fromru.com (preferable) or dkhalezov(a)yahoo.co.uk ( please, make sure to replace (a) for @ in the above E-mail addresses) or via CipherWall Network - send you requests to the following CWID: 1-7778 (Dimitri K) or via ICQ: 448400378 Or via his lawyer: Mr. Lak Nitiwattanawichan. LAK & ASSOCIATES, 333, Soi 40, Phahlyouthin Road, Senanikom, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Tel/Fax: +662-5792733, Mobile: +6687-0227078 Latest contact information, if changed, could also be found on the same page - it will be updated accordingly. 911thology Dimitri Khalezov ground zero radiation sickness. 9/11thology - Forum video_Dimitri_Khalezov_911thology_download_links Videos: 9/11 Truth Is Out - WTC Was Destroyed By 3 Thermo-Nuclear Explosions - Dimitri Khalezov Interview + The Third Truth PDF | Love for Life 911thology Nuclear demolition is another kind of controlled demolition. Please, note: even though this web site deals with purely technical matters and it has absolutely nothing to do with any politics, it might still be considered being "politically incorrect". So, a possibility exists that this site could be removed one day by authorities and such a prospect can not be ignored. If so happens, you would be able to find a reference to a new source here: www.911thology.cn (note, it is a *.cn domain, not *.com ), or you could search the Internet by '9/11thology' keyword and you would always find some related info. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers. ============ . . . . . ============ This article describes a general concept of nuclear demolition of skyscrapers - particularly in connection with known thermo-nuclear demolition schemes of the World Trade Center in New York and that of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Though, the current article does not deal with any exact details of implementation of this concept in regard to these particular structures, but provides rather general knowledge on this subject. Besides, this article does not consider any conspiracy behind nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11, neither does it consider any moral aspect of this issue - such as ground zero clean-up works and so on - it aims to explain its purely technical aspect. However, there are other articles available in the Internet that describe the WTC nuclear demolition scheme in more or less exact detail, as well as articles that describe particular conspiracy in regard to the actual WTC demolition - links to these articles are available at the end of the current description. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers was patented by " Controlled Demolition Inc." - the most renowned demolition company that deals with controlled demolition of buildings, and especially with controlled demolition of skyscrapers. The same company was a primary designer of nuclear demolition projects of the World Trade Center in New York and of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Photo: South Tower begins to collapse. The author of this article - Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former officer the Soviet nuclear intelligence, officially known as the Special Control Service of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry. The WTC demolition: atomic demolition vs nuclear demolition.

WTC controlled demolition: thermite, 'explosives' and myths. The WTC controlled demolition was, in fact, 'uncontrolled'.. WTC demolition videos show Towers collapses in good detail. 9/11thology forum Download links for 911thology video. 911thology Dimitri Khalezov video DVD download

Videos

back to top

from dimitri YouTube - 911 CNN -- poll: 66% of US citizens agree to forgo their liberties 9 11 Truth- Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov & Gordon Duff Discuss - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov blames MOSSAD for 911 - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov videos - SENSE TUBE Amazon.com: THE Third Truth (9781409288534): Dimitri Khalezov: Books Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions - Re-edited - YouTube 911Nuclear Demolition telephone interview to Dimitri Dimitri Khalezov the Russian Independent Researcher Speaks about his knowledge with False Flag Research and nuclear demolition with Steve Johnson in This First Part of the 9-11 Research Series Entitled 911Nuclear Demolition. BEFORE the World Trade Centers had begun their construction, the building contractors were required because of their sheer scale and size to submit the demolition plans ALONG with the construction plans. Because the plans contained details about using nuclear demolitions, they were given also to the THEN superpower of the USSR because of the peacetime nuclear treaty for using ANY nuclear blasts during peacetime the USSR were to be notified of any such plans to let off devices so Soviet Nuclear intelligence can be informed, as to avoid any nuclear misunderstandings during the Cold war period... Since the Cold War is over, Dimitri is living in retirement and has come forward with these plans, paperwork and all... Since coming forward Dimitris videos were hijacked by a copyright claim by Mi5 Agent Owen Le Winton, who also forced a re-edit on this particular video, http://www.youtube.com/user/owenlewinton Also Henry Makow has falsely claimed this information is just Dimitris "Research" slandering him as a liar. http://www.henrymakow.com/beware_bogus_9-11_truth_theori.html Publishing instead work by an Ed Ward: http://www.henrymakow.com/mini-nukes_were_used_on_9-11.html And Now pushing 911 NUT Judy Woods research about Direceted Energy Weapons: http://www.henrymakow.com/911_-_nukes_caused_this_devast.html However Spurious claims of dustification of metal have been laughed out of the academic realms because this picture shows a falling steel beam leaving a dust trail: http://www.henrymakow.com/dennis8.jpg Some 911Nutjobs think this is steel turning to dust and is now being pushed by Rense and Makow as the TRUTH. See 911 NUTS Featuring Nico Haupt, Paula Gloria, Webfairy and Judy Woods all making complete asses of themselves. http://southeastasianews.org/911/911_11_911nuts.html ---------------------------------------------- In The Next VIDEO to be released DImitri speaks about his research into the Sari Club - Nuclear Demolition False Flag attack in 2002 and about his brilliant insight into the enigmatic HAMBALI. 911 Nuclear Demolition - Steve Johnson interviews Dimitri Khalezov. Former Russian Military Nuclear Arms Specialist for the Former Soviet USSR Air Force. His Incredible 26 Part Youtube Video Series is Called 911thology and can be found at the following Page: http://www.youtube.com/user/DimitriKhalezov http://dkhalezov.com/ http://www.nuclear-demolition.com/ He now lives in isolation doing his research about Sept 11th crimes. Dimitri and Steve swap each others research and discuss other similar areas of research. In this call Steve wakes him up early Sunday morning firing him questions about his research and shares with him. New York Photographers: None saw a plane http://ziobusters.com/charlie_rose_round_table.html Dozens of witnesses of second plane.. All saw something different http://how911wasdone.com/index2.html 911Demolition theory is a 911taboo subject just as is No Plane

theories http://911taboo.net Charlie Rose 9-11 Documentary (Discovered By Genghis6199) http://www.youtube.com/user/genghis6l99 911 Emergency Dumped Vehicles Hir-es Pictures: Contaminated Emergency Vehicles Some barely scratched yet considered Toxic http://cryptome.info/wtc-fk/wtc-fk-full.htm Radiological Survey Done in New York in 2005 http://www.nysun.com/new-york/elevated-levels-of-radiumfound-in-area-of-fres... THE TRUTH ABOUT BALI SERIES http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edxFwClKyPI Ice Age Glaciers? Or Molten Bedrock "Nuke Shell"? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26844329/ The 40 Foot Pothole of Molten Rock http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1060043/Pictured-The-40ft-p... http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/09/22/nyregion/22rocksrefer_CA0.ready.... http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/nyregion/22rocks.html 911thology's Channel - YouTube INSIDE EXPLOSIONS INSTEAD OF PLANES DIMITRI KHALESOV - YouTube CIA George Tenet 9/11 Nuclear bombs - YouTube Nuclear destruction of the WTC - YouTube ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 1/10?? - YouTube (Jim Fetzer - very good) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 2/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7 complex prep, Energy Weapon) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 3/10?? - YouTube (nuke detonation 101 and WTC 7 intro) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 4/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7, absorbers, hotspots) http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1634 ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 5/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7 false wall) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 6/10?? - YouTube (cavity, zones, pressure wave) pressure wave travels 400km/sec ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 7/10?? - YouTube (WTC dust, tank steel, no planes) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 8/10?? - YouTube (bathtub, OBL lie, GZ) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 9/10?? - YouTube (bathtub, Viktor Bout, OBL) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 10/10?? - YouTube (Mike Harari) DIMITRI KHALEZOV 1 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Reload from http://www.youtube.com/anunnaki2006 | Breaking news special: Did Mossad agent Mike Harari brag of organizing 9/11? _on a Special Edition of The Kevin Barrett Show. This show was broadcast February 10, 2011. Please study the FRENCH CONNECTION to 9/11 with this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=tlzfFBYNxlU DIMITRI KHALEZOV 2 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Good explanations: Mike Harari, French connection, Free Masons DIMITRI KHALEZOV 3 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV 4 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Rayelan Allen and Dimitri Khalezov interviewed on the Vinny Eastwood Show DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (1/6) - YouTube vinny eastwood

DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (2/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (3/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (4/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (5/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (6/6) - YouTube South Tower of World Trade Center Collapse - YouTube North tower of world trade center collapse - YouTube 2nd Plane WTC - YouTube The Ultimate Con - 911 - YouTube 9/11 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 1/26 | 9/11 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov on blip.tv Dr Deagle Show 100628 1/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov 911 video - the most prohibited item on the web - YouTube 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26 : Dimitri Khalezov : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Evidence - Bathtub, Vehicles, etc

back to top

Khalezov is disinfo meant to discredit nuclear demolition - 9/11 Scholars Forum Peaceful nuclear explosions treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty (1976) | Nuclear Arms Control Treaties | atomicarchive.com Gasbuggy Dec 10, 1967 Investigation of neutronic performance of a peaceful nuclear explosive reactor (PACER) evaluating UF4 and ThF4 nuclides pe1182.pdf (application/pdf Object) Amazon.com: The Constructive Uses of Nuclear Explosives (9780070634824): edward teller: Books The Constructive uses of nuclear explosives by Edward Teller (Used, New, Out-of-Print) - Alibris Elements of controversy: the Atomic ... - Google Books 911truth.dk - Key points about the WTC towers (excellent) 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 1 - EXCELLENT - YouTube dust 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 2 (v. 2) - EXCELLENT - YouTube Sloped armour - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Vehicle armour - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main Battle Tank - M1, M1A1, and M1A2 Abrams Tank Protection Levels 2024-T6 aircraft aluminium plate products, buy 2024-T6 aircraft aluminium plate products from alibaba.com Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC 'Bathtub' - NY1.com wtc7lies Ground Zero's fires still burning - 03 December 2001 - New Scientist (Ultra violet absorbers) Ultra violet absorbers

Ground Zero's WTC Fires Still Burning PYROCOOL WAS USED TO "COVER" THERMITE EVIDENCE... *PIC* article-0-02C2ECC500000578-922_468x703_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 434x650 pixels) article_0_02C2ECC500000578_922.jpg (JPEG Image, 468x703 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) stromatolites.jpg (JPEG Image, 1000x701 pixels) THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands - Club Conspiracy Forums THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands - Page 2 - Club Conspiracy Forums Molten metal in basements 911 Demolition - YouTube Molten metal WTC - YouTube 9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero - YouTube Un-Debunkable 911 inside job proof - YouTube Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero - YouTube

Evidence - Iceage

back to top

Bedrock at WTC Tower 4 - YouTube iCe Age pothole found at Wtc ground Zero - YouTube ?911: Craters M-Nukes left in the WTC site?? - YouTube Joe Woolhead 9/11 photography (excellent) Ice Age Landscapes in Lower Manhattan - The New York Times > N.Y. / Region > Slide Show > Slide 1 of 12 At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age - NYTimes.com Ice Age geology revealed at Ground Zero - Technology & science - Science - msnbc.com No Abominoids Here: The Ground Zero Flap has Historical Roots At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age Ice Age relicts at Ground Zero | NJPB Forums iCe Age pothole found at Wtc ground Zero - YouTube Ground Zero Reveals Ice Age Evidence Traces of the Ice Age at Ground Zero: Gothamist At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age | News | Silverstein Properties Ice Age geology revealed at Ground Zero - Care2 News Network Pictured: The 40ft 'pothole' that shows Ground Zero was once the site of an Ice Age glacier | Mail Online The vehicles of 9/11..... where'd they go? - EMTLife.com - The #1 Online Forum for EMS-Related Discussion groundzerocleanup,freshkillssortingopera - wtc7lies khalezov-911-28-t4-glacier-end-of-august-2008-credit-joe-woolhead.jpg (JPEG Image, 450x338 pixels) Joe Woolhead glacier 22rocks2_650.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x433 pixels) - Joe Woolhead glacier New Scientist - Google Books Observations of Nuclear Explosive Melt Glass Textures and Surface Areas - 329450.pdf (application/pdf Object) The Nuclear Option | Oil Spill Recovery | Clean Up Oil | Oil Spill Resources production_dissolution_nuclearexplo.pdf (application/pdf Object)

ScienceDirect - Engineering Geology : Ice ages and nuclear waste isolation ScienceDirect - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids : Glass produced by underground nuclear explosions*1 Modelling of faulted rock mass response to glaciation, thermal loading and seismicity -- Stephansson and Shen 24 (4): 355 -- Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology Importance of geosphere in hard rock nuclear waste repositories... Iceage - Newly Mapped Walloomsac Formation in Lower Manhattan and New York Harbor and the Implications for Engineers - CJM 2010.pdf (application/pdf Object) Iceage - Bedrock Control of a Boulder-Filled Valley Under the World Trade Center Site CJMCM2008_WTCValley.pdf (application/pdf Object) Iceage - 50 Ka Till-Filled Pleistocene Plunge Pools and Potholes Found Beneath the World Trade Center Site, New York, NY - moss-09.pdf (application/pdf Object) article-0-02C2ECC500000578-922_468x703.jpg (JPEG Image, 468x703 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels)

Evidence - Nuclear Articles

back to top

back to top

Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11 View of a military expert: why did the towers of World Trade Center collapse Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre - GZero_Report.pdf (application/pdf Object) William Tahil, BA Dimitri Khalezov talks about this report in his documentary. This author does a good job of proving the same points that Dimitri testifies to, however he errors in saying it was an underground nuclear reactor that "exploded". World Trade Center Radiation Poisoning Analysis of Aerosols from the World Trade Center Collapse Site, New York, October 2 to October 30, 2001 - 02786820490250836 (application/pdf Object) NUKE USED IN WTC COLLAPSE 35 Reasons Micro-Nukes Were Utilized to Demolish the WTC Cores on 9/11 : Nuclear Demolition - BEST - WikiSpooks http://tinyurl.com/88dyfo5 Document:Dimitri Khalezov Interview - WikiSpooks File:Traces of Tritium at WTC.pdf - WikiSpooks File:Melt Glasses at Underground Test.pdf - WikiSpooks File:Containment of Soviet underground nuclear explosions.pdf - WikiSpooks Nuclear Files: Library: Treaties: Treaty on Undergorund Explosions for Peaceful Purposes, Decmeber 11, 1990 Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Peaceful nuclear explosions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nuclear weapons testing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Richter magnitude scale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Richter Earthquake Scale Earthquakes Magnitude Scale and Classes How Are Earthquake Magnitudes Measured? Richter_Mercalli.jpg (JPEG Image, 760 × 574 pixels) 6281319036_a1a95b9c09.jpg (JPEG Image, 411 × 500 pixels) 118elxx.jpg (JPEG Image, 551 × 626 pixels) 1. Brief history. Atomic demolition. 2. Modern history. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers. 3. How does a modern nuclear demolition work? 4. Videos showing dynamics of collapses of the WTC Twin Towers and the WTC building # 7. The US Government's Use of Atomic Bombs at the WTC on 9/11 Dimitri Khalezov and the MiniNukes of... - ! * POLITICS * ! - tribe.net China Syndrome at the WTC: The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 Because only nuclear chain reactions release massive heat almost indefinitely, without needing ANY oxygen whatsoever! This is not the case for any conventional (non-nuclear) fire. This “indefinite” massive heat source was the basis for the term “China Syndrome” in regards to a nuclear reactor mishap which, in theory (but not really due to other factors), could have massive indefinite heat leading to a nuclear reactor criticality (core) remnant burning all the way through to China. "SARCOPHAGUS"- The flesh-eating stone coffin Chernobyl Tomb 9/11 WTC. 2 Manhattan projects: ground zero and Ground Zero What is ground zero? History and definitions prior to 9/11. The twin towers and Bldg 7 were taken down by Nuclear Demolition Charges - Dimitri Khalezov - Project Nsearch 9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss - 12160 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE **** - Page 24 WTC 1/2 Collapse: I was a truther. Not any longer., page 14 Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC Vaporizing the World Trade Center Is Much of the World Trade Center Missing? Some conspiracy theorists claim that large amounts of the buildings were unaccounted for by the size of the rubble pile. Since only 12% of the building volume was solid, the towers should collapse into a pile 12% of the original height of the building, or just about 50 meters high. Since 18 meters of that pile would be filling the basement, the above-ground portion would be 32 meters high. The actual rubble pile reached the fifth story of adjacent buildings, so well outside the footprint of the tower the pile was five stories, or about 15 meters high. The pile would have been roughly conical, and would have included a lot of void space, increasing its height and offsetting the larger diameter of the pile. Overall the rubble pile is what you'd expect. So it simply isn't true that the rubble pile is only a small percentage of what would be expected. Some conspiracy sites allege that the rubble pile is only 5% of what would be expected. Others use a figure of 33% as the height of a rubble pile relative to the original building and then argue that the pile should have been 140 or so meters high. But when Controlled Demolition Inc. (http://www.controlled-demolition.com) dropped a 23-story, 439-foot (134 m) building in Detroit in 1997, they ended up with a pile averaging 35 feet high (11 m) and a maximum of 60 feet (18 m) high. The rubble pile was an average of 8% of the height of the original building and a maximum of 14%. Scaling that up to the World Trade Center, we get heights of 33 to 58

meters. In other words, the rubble pile at the World Trade Center is totally in line with other large building collapses. 33% may work for a small building a few stories high, but a large building will compress the debris pile a lot more and also fill void spaces more effectively with pulverized debris. Cold Fusion Research: Models And Potential Benefits Treasonous BBC and new 9/11 Hit Job | Prasutagus's Blog As Dimitri said, 9/11 was … « Opportunities Have Consequences CheckTheEvidence.com - Home Andrew Johnson Mini-Nukes 237 World Trade Center Radiation Poisoning First Responder - "We Were Nuked on 9-11" -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net

Videos

back to top

sv3rige's Channel - YouTube Video: visible ground shaking at the moment of the WTC demolition. Video: collapse of the WTC-2 (the South Tower) following its nuclear demolition. Video: collapse of the WTC-1 (the North Tower) following its nuclear demolition. Video: WTC-7 demolition. Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth - (24min mark) - YouTube A rcoones video: Amazing testimony of ex CIA Asset Susan Lindauer. 5 years of legal troubles, 1 year in prison for daring to tell the truth. During the Bush era the top controllers of the governmental mechanics of Defense and national Security wanted to have a war with Iraq. They got their wish and anyone who got in the way were dealt with severely no matter if they violated a law or not. Not brought to trial she was jailed under the "Patriot Act" which amounted to summary punishment outside a Verdict in a court of law. She was punished in jail without a Trial at all This is part of her story that is just unfolding now. She has waited 10 years to tell this story. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland911Truth/ http://freeworldfilmworks.com/ http://ourenglanduk.com/ http://commoncrime.net/ http://aircrap.org/ "Need information and data relative to the creation and designed use of Smart Meters. Is this as I suspect to be used to identify areas in the USA and Britain to locate population groups that are of lower intelligence and subject to extermination. In short the kill off of the useless eaters and non productive groups. Blacks, Browns, Asians, lower class Whites etc . We suspect they will target these people for termination by ratcheting up the voltage to a point which would render them mumified, docile or dead. I believe the purpose of making smart meters mandatory is to enable the CIA, NSA and the dept of Naval Intelligence to soon determine which portions of the population are to be terminated in accordance with the Illuminazi plan to reduce the population by 95%. Obviously Kissinger, The Rothchilds, The Rockefellers, and others of this Evilarchy are party to this plan to reduce the population of the planet by 95%. Bill Gates, Ted The Terrible Turner, and other Malthusians are actively engaged in bringing about this mass murder that is obviously underway. We need those of you who understand how this grid system works and how the genicidal program is to be launched. Obviously this program out Hitlers Hitler. Nothing like it in the history of Mankind comes close to the carnage that could well be before us were we not to act. I need your help to put the pieces of this GeoGenicidal jigsaw puzzle together. Only those of you who have knowledge and information at the highest level need make contact. We need information with specifics explaining

how this control grid is in place and how it can be dismantled." Thank You...Anthony J Hilder contact: anthonyjhilder@hotmail.com Be a Whistle Blower Researcher or Serious Political Activist. Are you and executive and engineer in a positions of mid to hi gh level post won orking for a major electical provider in the USA, UK, or Sweden and have knowledge as to how much damage one of these Death Meters can do. We are hunting for whistle blowers. I will keep you identity visual and verbal from public views. Will do interviews behind screens and with voice alternators to cover the privacy issue. Weve already had two who have given us large amounts of pertinent information relative to the crimes now in the process of being committed. anthonyjhilder@hotmail.com CIA Whistle-blower Susan Lindauer Exposes Everything 9/11 : conspiracy 911 Eyewitness Pyroclastic Flow - Proof of Controlled Demolition – WTC1,2 + 7 (long) This centuries Zapruder film of 9/11 and seven laws of science prove treason, fraud and murder This clip shows a huge amount of hot energy and gasses were released on the demolition of the 3 towers in NYC on Sept 11, 2001. The Pyroclastic flow of dust and debris is a telltale sign of a controlled demolition. WT7 also shows the same explosive energy in its destruction. Pools of molten metal were found in the basement of the 3 buildings. Thermite could explain this. “Pull it” is completely explained along with Larry Silversteins’ admission to it. 911 Eyewitness - Pyroclastic Flow was a telltale sign of controlled demolition (short) Pyroclastic flow is defined on the US Geological Survey website as a ground hugging avalanche of hot gas and debris. The couliflower shaped debris clouds observed during the collapse of the WTC buildings on 09/11/01 were telltale signs of a pyroclastic flow. These phenomenon are typically visible only during volcanic eruptions and controlled demolition of buildings 911 Eyewitness - A closer look at the debris left by the collapses at WTC 911 Eyewitness - Hoboken "Highlights" 60 min. 911 Eyewitness Hoboken Highlights 1 Hour TV Special An Atomic Bomb will stop the Gulf Oil Leak, LOOK! - YouTube Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #35 - YouTube Nuclear Underground Detonation (Sedan Event - Ploughshare) - YouTube More Than Junk Science - 60 Minutes - CBS News see: Cold Fusion - More Than Junk Science (60 Minutes, CBS News)(360p_H.264-AAC) Dr. Deagle 911 WTC mini nukes test results (short version) - YouTube 9/11 Underground Explosion - YouTube Nuclear destruction of the WTC - YouTube Dr. Deagle 911 WTC mini nukes test results (extended version) 911 Eyewitness - Evidence of thermonuclear explosions - YouTube 9/11 WTC ?????? (Ground Zero ) ?? ???? (H-bomb nuke test ) - YouTube ????????? (Ground Zero Truth) - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 1/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 2/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 3/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube

Dr Deagle Show 100628 4/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube 9/11 Nuclear Demolition of The WTC - by Dimitri Khalezov 9/11 Expanding Rising Mushroom Cloud - YouTube Look above the tower after it begins exploding, at around :10. Notice the huge, rising, expanding new cloud. Observe the plume expanding to the right, which is west, which is against the wind. Marvel at the cauliflower shapes, much more distinct than the surrounding smoke that has diffused into the air. There is one and only one explanation for this phenomenon. A very large heat energy input. Standard demolitions do not create a mushroom cloud. This one did. Besides proving demolition, this video rules out Judy Wood's ridiculous claim of "no significant heat". For anyone who hasn't been paying attention, Judy Wood is a fraud. John Hutchison is a fraud. There is no such thing as any Hutchison Effect. The twin towers were blown up with explosives, most likely nuclear. Blog entry is here: http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/10/mushroom-cloud.html

9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 1 - YouTube The title foer this video series is supposed to be sarcastic, but that seems to have backfired on the uploader with ratings currently at 59 likes vs. 72 dislikes. Regardless, the testimony of the firefighters actually describes EXACTLY what Dimitri claims happened ... the firefighters describe the towers shaking and they also felt the ground shake as thought a train was going past them. This information describes the Seismic Readings for a strong earthquake (well over 5.5 on the Richter Scale - telling us than not less than 100 kiloton underground nuclear explosion must have been responsible). 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 2 - YouTube 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 3 - YouTube This video provides additional testimony that the firefighters felt the buildings shake like a train was running by them. This supports Dimitri's detailed explanation in Part 2 of the Seismic readings being tampered with. 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 4 - YouTube 9/11 Truth: Steel Buildings Don't Collapse From Fire - YouTube

Jeff Prager

back to top

Jeff Prager: Nuclear 911 (2011) - Detailed Exposure of the Thermonuclear Demolition Jeff Prager - 911 Dust (2011) Free File Hosting Made Simple - MediaFire Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP.pdf - File Shared from Box - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 1 to 109.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 110 to 199.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 200 to 310.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.1-243.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.244-301.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.302-354.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage Kill Zone.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage

1 Murdering Liberty Killing Hope.pdf - File Shared from Box.net - Free Online File Storage 1 Murdering Liberty Killing Hope - When psychopaths rule the world After 911 Book II Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Operation Plowshare

back to top

OPERATION PLOWSHARE 1962 (WITH SLOW-MOTIONS) - YouTube An overview of Operation Plowshare, which occured in 1962. Operation Plowshare's main objective was to test and excavate the earth with nuclear explosives. The results? Over 12 million tonnes of earth were displaced by the blast, creating a crater 97.5 meters (320 feet) deep and 390.1 meters (1,280 feet) wide. PLUS: incredible SLOW-MOTIONS of the HUGE explosions! AWESOME!!! Plowshare, Part 1/2 (1961) - YouTube Plowshare, Part 2/2 (1961) - YouTube GodLikeProductions.com Video - Audio & Image Hosting | An Atomic Bomb will stop the Gulf Oil Leak LK Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Films - YouTube Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #34 - YouTube

Evidence - Pentagon Missile

back to top

Russian submarine K-141 Kursk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Russian submarine Kursk explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Expecting the Raptures: Dimitri Khalezov - Russian missile hit Pentagon, one of the 24 missing from Kursk. Next one - Rome? Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed FOUR NUKES STOLEN FROM THE RUSSIAN SUB ‘KURSK’ (Paul Laine) I have independent confirmation from a Mr. Paul Lane, of Pentagon military intelligence – he was a part of the Men Who Stare At Goats group – that four nuclear weapons were stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk after it sank. I think it was in 2000 or something. It was one of those nuclear weapons that was smuggled in [to Japan]. DW: Stolen by who, though? BF: This is the Odessa group. The Nazi group. The one that was trying to set up a fascist world government – a Fourth Reich. DW: Okay. How did they get to the Kursk to get these nukes out? BF: I don’t know the technical details, but they have submarine bases in various parts of the world. I assume it was from one of these submarine bases. WHY STEAL NUKES IF YOU CAN BUILD YOUR OWN? DW: The next question, then, would be why would they need to get it from the Kursk if they are powerful enough to make their own? BF: The public nuclear devices are under strict safety protocols. You can’t just take them and then blow them up somewhere. There are too many people involved in the chain of command. They tried to do that. nestingwave The weapons used in the attack were created with fuel taken from a nuclear warhead stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk. Paul Laine from Pentagon Military intelligence confirmed that four nuclear warheads were stolen from the Kursk when it “sank” in August of 2000. An MI6 agent using the name Richard Sorge also informed the Japanese police in 2010 that a nuclear warhead had been smuggled into Japan via Okinawa and was located in a property in Hinode Town, in Western Tokyo owned by former Prime Minister and senior North Korean Agent Yasuhiro Nakasone. The agent later informed the police the weapon had been smuggled into the headquarters of the General Association of North Korean Residents of Japan.

Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty & Israel’s Original Plans for World War III | The Blog of the WTC Demolition Site K-141 Kursk Accident Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 THE KURSK TO BE RAISED BY MAMMOET / Kursk submarine (2000-2003) / WPS Russian Media Monitoring Agency After long negotiations and arguments on who will raise the submarine Kursk from the bottom of the Barents Sea, the Russian government signed a contract with the Dutch company Mammoet. Other applicants, the Dutch company Smit Tak and the Norwegian company Halliburton Subsea, will be subcontractors. The submarine will be raised on September 15. The value of the contract has not been made public yet. However, Reuters has reported already that overall, approximately $70 million will be spent on salvaging the Kursk. Mammoet has raised and transported many and varied heavy vessels. For instance, the Dutch submarines Zwaardvis and Tjigerhaai were transported 80 meters by ground to their floating dock and then delivered from Rotterdam to the Far East. The submarines weighed 1,600 tons each, and they were raised 80 meters in half an hour. Besides, in 2000, Mammoet managed to raise a port lifting crane weighing 1,550 tons that fell in the Danish port of Odensee in a storm. Practically nothing is known about other foreign firms that applied for participation in this project but failed to be included in it. Why have Moscow and St. Petersburg decided to choose the consortium including the American company Halliburton acting through its Norwegian subsidiary? By the way, the hypothesis of a collision between the Kursk and an American submarine has not been refuted yet, and participation of an American company in this project suggests the thought of some special interest. During the presidential campaign Halliburton became a subject of publications in the American press, since US Vice President Richard Cheney used to work for this firm. Opponents accused Cheney of using his political links for finding profitable contracts for his company. For instance, "The Times" has written that Cheney managed to thrash out a $292-million credit for the Tumen Oil Company so that it would be able to buy equipment from the aforementioned company. "KURSK" Lifting Operation: Mammoet Transport BV company: reference material - TicketsOfRUSSIA.ru "KURSK" Lifting Operation: The Secret of the Kursk’s Weapons - TicketsOfRUSSIA.ru Raising the Kursk Page 3: Raised Kursk May Leave Questions Unanswered - ABC News P-700 Granit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia BBC NEWS | In Depth | Russian sub BBC NEWS | Europe | Media struggles for Kursk truth BBC NEWS | Europe | Kursk relatives still waiting for answers BBC NEWS | Europe | First pictures inside charred Kursk BBC NEWS | In Depth | 'Torpedo explosion' sank Kursk BBC NEWS | Europe | What caused the accident? BBC NEWS | In Depth | First Kursk missiles removed Russian salvage workers have removed the first three of 22 Granit cruise missiles from the Kursk nuclear submarine. BBC NEWS | Europe | Kursk raised from sea bed Radiation 'normal'"The emotion was very great when we heard this news, because it means this enormous labour by divers, sailors and technical experts, has not been in vain," the head of Russia's Northern Fleet, Vice-

Admiral Mikhail Motsak said. BBC NEWS | Europe | US experts: Double blast 'sank Kursk' BBC NEWS | Europe | Disaster exposes military decline BBC NEWS | In Depth | First Kursk missiles removed

Evidence - Radiation Articles

back to top

back to top

Investigation of radiation-caused cancer among Ground Zero workers « nuclear-news Radiation had contaminated the World Trade Center Towers « The Canadian National Newspaper Exopolitics Headlines Radiation had contaminated the World Trade Center Towers « The Canadian Headlines Newspaper Medical response to terrorism: preparedness and clinical practice - Daniel C. Keyes - Google Books » “MYSTERY DISEASE” AFFECTS NEW YORKERS IN WAKE OF 911 ATTACKS - Recovering Liberal What was not published in the Post, or anywhere else for that matter, is the recent opinions of some in the medical community that some of those afflicted by the “mystery disease” may actually be suffering the affects of uranium poisoning and not the result of breathing asbestos, computer part fragments, and concrete powder, as they were led to believe. Should these theories be correct and acknowledged, the City of New York and the Federal Government are looking at medical costs in the billions as uranium radiation poisoning is known to cause over time, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, joint and muscle pain, neurological and/or nerve damage, mood disturbances, auto-immune deficiencies, lung and kidney damage, vision problems, skin rupture, increase in miscarriages, maternal mortality and genetic birth defects/deformation. .... One theory worth investigating comes to us from writer, Greg Szymanski. In an article published on August 19th of last year, two high profile radiation experts, Leuren Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California, and now as a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project, and retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke, a PhD in educational physics and former top military expert, concur that the Pentagon strike involved the use of a missile, rather than a plane as in the official government scenario. Szymanski‘ s article also claims that Geiger counter readings right after the attack showed high levels of radiation 12 miles away from the Pentagon crash site. Thousands In NY Dying Of '911 Disease' - Uranium Probable 9-11 Responders Struggle for Health, Help | Womens eNews Evidence grows that 9/11 first-responders got cancer after working at Ground Zero - NY Daily News A leading authority on the illnesses suffered by Ground Zero responders, Dr. Philip Landrigan says that an analysis of 20,000 medical case histories revealed an incidence of cancer that is 14% higher tha expected for a population of the same profile. The most common elevations were in prostate, thyroid and blood cancers. Landrigan’s findings add to the evidence that the toll from service on or around The Pile, bad as that toll has been, will significantly worsen with time. Research by fire department doctors previously had found a 19% higher cancer rate among FDNY members who’d been at Ground Zero than among those who hadn’t. 360 post-9/11 workers have died, including 80 of cancer, says state - NY Daily News More than 360 workers who dealt with the aftermath of the World Trade Center disaster have died, state health officials said Wednesday. Officials have determined the cause of death of 154 of the

responders and volunteers who toiled at Ground Zero, the blocks nearby and at the Fresh Kills landfill, where debris from the site was taken. Of those, 80 died of cancer. "It's the tip of the iceberg," said David Worby, who is representing 10,000 workers - 600 with cancer - who say they got sick after working on rescue and recovery efforts. "These statistics bear out how toxic that site was," Worby said. Most of the deadly tumors were in the lungs and digestive system, according to the tally from the state's World Trade Center Responder Fatality Investigation Program. Other deaths were traced to blood cancers and heart and circulatory diseases. Five ex-workers committed suicide, said Kitty Gelberg, who is tracking the deaths for the program. Gelberg said she had not yet determined whether the number of cancer deaths was more or less than those typically occurring in men in their 20s to 50s who work as cops, firefighters or laborers - the majority of 9/11 workers. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/360-post-9-11-workers-died-including-80-cancer-state-article1.328751#ixzz1mQyeIavs Hundreds of 9/11 cops diagnosed with cancer — RT Hundreds of 9/11 first responders die of cancer — RT 9/11 causes cancer — RT 9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale” : Veterans Today RADIATION CANCERS KILL 345 SO FAR 9/11 FIREFIGHTERS ARE GETTING CANCER AT A FASTER RATE THAN OTHERS, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER REVEALS Early assessment of cancer outcomes in New York City firefighters after the 9/11 attacks: an observational cohort study : The Lancet Study Points to WTC Cancer Link Health effects arising from the September 11 attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia City of Dust World Trade Center (WTC) Health Studies and Information on Health Services This link is included to show DECEPTION. The word "cancer" does not appear once on this bullshit report, yet hundreds of resuce workers have been diagnosed with cancer, or have died from it. World Trade Center (WTC) Responder Fatality Investigation Program village voice > news > Death by Dust by Kristen Lombardi picture: To date, 75 recovery workers at ground zero have been diagnosed with blood cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors and epidemiologists have confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure. Ernie Vallabuona is one of them. photo: Scott McDermott Ozonoff echoes all five of his colleagues when he draws parallels between the aftermath of 9-11 and that of another massive exposure: the atomic-bombs dropped on Japan. Bomb survivors experienced excessive spikes in leukemia rates within the first five years, a surprising discovery for epidemiologists in the mid 20th century. While this outbreak resulted from radiation, both it and 9-11 involved a sudden and intense blast of carcinogens. For bomb survivors, leukemia appeared first, followed by breast and lung cancer. "That could happen with 9-11," says Samet, the Johns Hopkins epidemiology department chair. "It might be what we're seeing today." Death by Dust - Page 1 - News - New York - Village Voice Police union demands information on 9/11 toxic debris | 7online.com NEW YORK (WABC) -- New York City's police union is demanding more information about the effects of

toxic debris from the 9/11 attacks. The Patrolmen's Benevolent Association called on the city to release all data about officers who suffered cancer after responding at the World Trade Center at a news conference on Sunday. The union also showed the uniform worn that day by Officer Alonzo Harris. It was tested and found to have dangerous carcinogens on it. The P.B.A. says the city has dragged its feet on providing information about first responders. "It's unconscionable that they would not release this data. This is an issue of men and women who serve this city without question and they're looking for one thing, they're looking for the treatment that they deserve," P.B.A. President Patrick Lynch said. The union wants cancer included on the list of illnesses covered by the Zadroga Act, to help first responders. Study: 9/11 Responders Getting Cancer - Video - WSB Atlanta - CNN 9/11 first responders and cancer - CBS News Video Study shows rise of cancer in 9/11 firefighters - CBS News Study: 9/11 responders suffer increased cancer rate (msnbc) msnbc video: 9/11 first responders at risk for cancer Study: 9/11 firefighters have 19 percent higher cancer risk - Health - Cancer - msnbc.com Top Doctors Say Trade Center Dust Could Cause Cancer - October 4, 2006 - The New York Sun The Canadian National Newspaper: Japanese activists claim that 9/11 related cancers similar illnesses in Hiroshima after dropping of nuclear bomb in World War II Lawyers for sick Ground Zero clean-up workers set to pocket more than $400million from lawsuits | Mail Online » Hundreds of 9/11 first responders die of cancer Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! Plea for help for 9/11 cancer victims | World news | guardian.co.uk 9/11 firefighters ARE getting cancer at a faster rate than others, chief medical officer reveals | Mail Online 9/11 First Responders Cancer | Health friends Cough and Bronchial Responsiveness in Firefighters at the World Trade Center Site — NEJM Results In the first six months after September 11, 2001, World Trade Center cough occurred in 128 of 1636 firefighters with a high level of exposure (8 percent), 187 of 6958 with a moderate level of exposure (3 percent), and 17 of 1320 with a low level of exposure (1 percent). In addition, 95 percent had symptoms of dyspnea, 87 percent had gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 54 percent had nasal congestion. Of those tested before treatment of World Trade Center cough, 63 percent of firefighters (149 of 237) had a response to a bronchodilator and 24 percent (9 of 37) had bronchial hyperreactivity. Chest radiographs were unchanged from precollapse findings in 319 of the 332 with World Trade Center cough. Among the cohort without severe cough, bronchial hyperreactivity was present in 77 firefighters with a high level of exposure (23 percent) and 26 with a moderate level of exposure (8 percent).

Study: Cancer Risk Higher for WTC Firefighters | Firehouse.com Lawmakers Push to Add Cancers to Zadroga Act | Firehouse.com FDNY Study Confirms Rise in Cancer After 9/11 | Firehouse.com More Than 10,000 9/11 Responders Settle Suits | Firehouse.com NYC 9/11 Toxic Brew Sickens Thousands | Firehouse.com

Videos

back to top

New 9/11 Eyewitness Evidence of Bombs at WTC - excellent - YouTube Excellent interview. Listen to the person being interviewed. He explains that he was wearing the very

best protection mask yet still became very sick. (6min mark)

CNN - 70% of WTC first responders are ill - YouTube Only 9 years and 900 dead first responders later are they just now getting the health care they deserve. Nine years after 9/11, 900 responders are dead - YouTube Nine hundred 9/11 heroes have died since the 2001 terrorist attacks. Thousands of others are suffering from various cancers believed to have been caused by toxins at Ground Zero. The US federal government has failed, thus far, to pass 9/11 health legislation that would assist 9/11 responders with medical care. 9/11 Causing Cancer - YouTube 9/11 First Responders Plagued by Cancer, Asthma, PTSD - ABC News "I've been to 54 funerals of firefighters since 9/11 and 52 of them are cancer-related," says John Feal, a former firefighter and founder of the FealGood Foundation, an advocacy group seeking medical coverage and compensation for first responders of 9/11. Respiratory Illness, PTSD Appear Linked in 9/11 Workers - ABC News 9/11 first responders and cancer - YouTube The results of the long awaited cancer study proving a link between 9/11 first responders and cancer diagnoses is finally revealed. Jeff Glor reports on a New York City firefighter who says working at the World Trade Center after 9/11 is the cause for his lymphoma. 9/11 First Responders Cancer - YouTube Rare cancers. The World Trade Center Health Program claims there is not enough scientific evidence that some 9/11 First Responders are suffering from rare cancer because of their rescue efforts on September 11th (therefore they will not get public funding to treat their illness). Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian discuss. 9/11 First Responder Cancer: Coincidence? - YouTube Sick 9/11 responders forgotten - YouTube 9/11 first responders are outraged as Congress did not pass a bill that would have given the responders health coverage for their illnesses. Kenny Specht, a former NYFD lieutenant, asks how often human life takes a backseat to partisanship in Washington, DC? He went on to say he is tired of selling death to Congress and he is done with Washington politicians.

Viktor Bout

back to top

Viktor Bout Stung By DEA Operation ‘Relentless’: Sentenced to 25 Years | Dobroyeutro's Blog Convicted Arms Dealer Bout’s Sentencing Delayed | Russia | RIA Novosti Judge to hear Bout's appeals instead of passing sentence | Russian Legal Information Agency (RAPSI). 911 & Viktor Bout : Interview Victor Bout, Dimitri Khalezov & Military Unit 46179 | Decrypted Matrix Viktor Bout, who inspired the movie Lord of War, has been sentenced to 25 years prison | Herald Sun Victor Bout Must Be Silenced! | Veterans Today Victor Bout Must Be Silenced | 2012: What's the 'real' truth?

Arms Trafficking, Stolen Missiles, Soviet Submarines, Nuclear Detonations and 9/11: Exclusive Interview with Dimitri Khalezov in Bangkok | Dobroyeutro's Blog Viktor Bout Asks The Judge Not To Sentence: Attorney Dayan’s Letter To The Judge | Dobroyeutro's Blog The Excavator: Russian Whistleblower Dimitri Khalezov Says U.S. And Russia Are Framing Former Russian Military Officer Viktor Bout Most_shocking_interview_English.pdf (application/pdf Object) Viktor Bout: Russian Patsy Framed by Russia/US Intelligence Working Together: Important First Update | Vatican Assassins Victor A. Bout What Does Viktor Bout Know? - by Douglas Farah | Foreign Policy US-Russia Bidding War For 9/11 “Merchant Of Death” Reaches $20 Billion Anatomy of a Frame | Veterans Today Obama Ordered To Denver Bunker By US Military | EUTimes.net Mike Philbin Blog: Wayne Madsen says, "Viktor Bout knows too much about 9-11," ?Viktor Bout: Lord of War blame game?? - YouTube ?Merchant of Death or victim of US propaganda??? - YouTube ?This is who invented Victor Bout, Johan Peleman?? - YouTube Extradited: 'Merchant of Death' Viktor Bout faces life in US jail - YouTube Daniel Estulin: Bout just a pawn, endgame - to get at Russia - YouTube Exclusive video of Victor Bout arrival in New York - YouTube Victor Bout, the six billion dollar man - YouTube Victor Bout, a tale of political persecution - YouTube

research old news articles

back to top

backissues.com - New York Times Magazine 1980's - Category Details The New York Times: Search for 'world trade center device' TEACHING TALL BUILDINGS TO KEEP THEIR BALANCE - NYTimes.com The New York Times: Search for 'world trade center discovered' "world trade center" - Boston.com Local Search Boston Globe Archive Boston Globe Archive - BUILDER WANTS TO GO TWO UP ON CHICAGO Boston Globe Archive - ABC'S CASE OF NUCLEAR SHIVERS Boston Globe Archive - [ Two of the Western world's worst nightmares - terr... ] Boston Globe Archive - BOSTON INVESTOR BUYS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero . George Tamaro, p. 1 | PBS America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero . Peter Rinaldi | PBS

Videos

back to top

9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, pt. 1 (excellent) - YouTube firefighters claiming the building turned to dust no desks, no phones, pulverized 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 2 - YouTube 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 3 - YouTube

Psychologists Explain 911 Denial - YouTube Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building (on 9/11?) - YouTube Bush Saw #1 plane hit WTC despite no airtime till 9/12 p1/2 - YouTube A snippet from The Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 Special You Never Saw. This clip is the smoking gun that once again proves Bush is a liar. Bush recounts his time in the schoolhouse on 9/11 some 6 weeks after 9/11 and claims he saw the first plane hit the first WTC tower. He says "the TV was obviously on". Well, Mr. Bush, there weren't any live shots in real time being broadcast or re-aired on Public TV that morning of the first plane hitting the first tower. That didn't air until the next day from a French TV Crew, ironically who were making a documentary on New York firefighters. Bush Saw #1 plane hit WTC despite no airtime till 9/12 p2/2 - YouTube 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory - (very good funny) YouTube Where are the 9/11 Victims? - YouTube Uploaded by chriskendall1 on Jan 25, 2011 ********************************************************** NOTICE: This video was originally titled: "The Social Security Death Index and the 9/11 Victims " This video was recently sited in a news article(http://fwd4.me/06vq) where the reporter gave the title as "Where are the 9/11 Victims?"(from the opening caption). -hence the title change. ********************************************************** http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ Everyone I know who has passed away appears in the index, even people under age 65. Try it yourself. You can arbitrarily call up the reported deaths for any number of days to get an average. When I did a search on multiple random days for New York in the year 2001 the average was around 400. I know that a handful of 9/11 victims do appear in the index but why only so few. 3000 supposedly died and a majority must have resided in New York. This a glaring omission by anyone's reckoning. Question: If the SSDI is so unreliable, as conspiracy deniers clam, why would genealogists and biographers use it as a tool? From Wikipedia: The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the United States Social Security Administration's Death Master File Extract. Most persons who have died since 1962 who had a Social Security Number (SSN) and whose death has been reported to the Social Security Administration are listed in the SSDI. For most years since 1973, the SSDI includes 93 percent to 96 percent of deaths of individuals aged 65 or older.[1] It contains the records of over 84 million people, and was last updated on September 10, 2009. Unlike the Death Master File, the SSDI is available free online from several genealogy websites. The SSDI is a popular tool for genealogists and biographers because it contains valuable genealogical data.

9/11 Truth: The Third Stage (1 of 3) - YouTube 9/11 Truth: The Third Stage (2 of 3) - YouTube 9/11 Truth: The Third Stage (3 of 3) - YouTube 9/11: The Top Scientific Arguments - YouTube Jim Fetzer's bizarre phone call to Judy Wood. (part 1 of 2) - YouTube Jim Fetzer's bizarre phone call to Judy Wood. (part 2) - YouTube FETZER ON CHOMSKY: Linguistics & 9/11 (snowshoefilms) - YouTube 9-11 Truth, Chomsky and Assange - YouTube THE REAL 9/11 CONSPIRACY (Chomsky) - YouTube Jim Fetzer 9/11 interview. FreeTruth Show September 2011 - YouTube Jim Fetzer - McKnight Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Minnesota Duluth; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth; Editor, Assassination Science; Co-Editor, Assassination Research http://911scholars.org/ http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/

9/11 inside job Prof Jim Fetzer dumps on Hannity and Colmes - YouTube Once again the legend Prof Jim Fetzer makes mince meat of the fox news gatekeepers ! Dr. Fetzer comments on" James Fetzer on Hannity & Colmes" - YouTube David Ray Griffin Debunks Popular Mechanics in Osaka - YouTube New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside' - Manny Badillo - YouTube New picture releases are shedding light on September 11th, some say they prove that the assault on America proves a homegrown attack. The new photos are provided by US national institute of standards and technology. There are over 2,000 new photos that have been made public. Manny Badillo says that you see an explosion from the inside, not what it has seemed to be, he says there has never been a building taken down by a plane. 9/11 WTF? - YouTube (see also ZERO HOUR P4 @ 6:30') 9/11 "My Pet Goat" Crowley's Satanic Ritual - YouTube This Is The Level Of Satanic Magick Illusion That May Be Mesmerizing You. Unplug. Be Happy. The Key To Spirituality Is In Maslow's Hierarchy Of Needs. I Actually Came Across Some Heavy Christian Propaganda Taking The Completely Logical Approach To Health And Making It A Cult Or Something. No, Think For Yourself. Be An Individual, By Being Who You Are. Soon As You Act Like A Label Or Can Be Branded, You Are In A Cult. You Are The Monkey Doing. Stop Being A Monkey And Use Extreme Discernment. If You Play With Fire You Will Get Burned. You Are In A Cult Until You Think For Yourself, And Figure Out "What Is" With God, & Without A Single Word From Another Man. 'US govt. made 9/11 to dominate world' - YouTube BBC Humiliated In Botched Niels Harrit 9/11 Interview - May 2011 - YouTube The BBC attempted to interview Niels Harrit in an effort to produced heavily edited, biased material for their propaganda campaign against the truth getting out about 9/11. Unfortunately however, Niels Harrit brought his own camera along and exposed the BBC for the Marxist cranks they are! At 42:00-45:00 the BBC interviewer tries to assert that one of the 9/11 hijacker's passports, FELL OUT OF THE HIJACKERS POCKET AND FLUTTERED OUT OF THE CRASHED AIR CRAFT THAT WAS LODGED IN ONE OF THE BUILDINGS, DOWN ON TO THE PAVEMENT OUTSIDE THE WORLD TRADE CENTRE, WHERE IT WAS HASTILY PICKED UP BY FBI OFFICERS SHORTLY BEFORE THE FIRST TOWER COLLAPSED!... LOL! ~Bush Insider Says 911 Was An Inside Job~ - Morgan Reynolds - YouTube 9/11 Brave Man Telling us the truth 100% Government in controll of demolition of twin towers - YouTube 9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon - YouTube 2.3 TRillion $$ of the TAXPAYER's MONEY IS MISSING - YouTube Alex Jones Discusses False Flag Operations - YouTube New 9/11 Eyewitness Evidence of Bombs at WTC - YouTube 9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! - YouTube 9/11: Rudy Giuliani Interview with Peter Jennings (ABC) - YouTube averagebodybuilder's Channel - YouTube

Alex Jones - Scott Halfmann: Arrested at 9/11 Memorial for talking about the 9/11 Cover-Up! - YouTube

Documentaries

back to top

9/11 Ultimate Conspiracy Confronting the Evidence SEPTEMBER CLUES : Definitive Edition | 2008 (FULL VERSION) - YouTube 9/11 In Plane Site - Director's Cut http://www.911inplanesite.com/911synopsis.html 9/11 MYSTERIES [full documentary] - YouTube 9/11 TRUTH: Hollywood Speaks Out (FULL LENGTH 720p HD Film) - YouTube Truth TV World News-9/11 Ripple Effect-The Movie-CNN,ABC,CBS,FOX,NBC,BBC lied to us on 9/11/2001! - YouTube 9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) - YouTube "Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the socalled 9/11 "Truth" movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminal group who masterminded the attacks. As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.' Utilizing evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to." ZERO -(full movie) An Investigation Into 911. - YouTube Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut - YouTube http://www.trueworldhistory.info | Loose Change is an internet film written and directed by Dylan Avery, produced by Korey Rowe with researcher Jason Bermas. The film presents a 9/11 conspiracy theory to set forth the claim that elements within the United States government planned and executed the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. The film was released through the creators' company, Louder than Words, and received wide attention after Loose Change 2nd Edition was featured on a Binghamton, New York local FOX affiliate, WICZ-TV (FOX 40).[1] It is one of the most watched films on the Internet, with over 10 million viewers in 2006.[2] The accuracy and fairness of Loose Change has been disputed by Popular Mechanics, media outlets and independent researchers. On September 11, 2006 Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas appeared on "Democracy Now! the War and Peace Report", to debate James Meigs and David Dunbar,[3] two editors of Popular Mechanics and the book Debunking 9/11 Myths.[4] The film has been edited and re-released in a second edition, then recut again removing some of the inaccuracies that were in previous editions. A further "final cut" version was originally planned for release on September 11 2006, but was delayed and is now pushed back to February or March 2007. http://cms.ae911truth.org | http://www.truthaction.org http://www.wearechange.org | http://pressfortruth.ca http://www.infowars.com | http://www.trueworldhistory.info Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut Painful Deceptions ( Full Length ) - YouTube 9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) - YouTube "Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the socalled 9/11 "Truth" movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminal group who masterminded the attacks. As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.' Utilizing evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to." http://www.911missinglinks.com/

INSIDE 9/11 : ZERO HOUR (PART 1 of 4) - YouTube

Part1 (contains:the plan/hijacking/WTC impacts) INSIDE 9/11 : ZERO HOUR (PART 2 of 4) - YouTube Part 2 (contains:pentagon attack/united93/WTC jumpers/firemen reach impact zones) INSIDE 9/11 : ZERO HOUR (PART 3 of 4) - YouTube Part 3 (contains WTC collapse north and south/aftermath/ rescue attempts/post 9/11 world) INSIDE 9/11 : ZERO HOUR (PART 4 of 4) - YouTube part4 (contains: the death toll/ missing/cleanup/road after 9/11/) Steve Emerson 6:30' mark (FBI claims that they need more blood) Famous Quote: I heard it repeatedly after the '93 world trade center bombing, by saying, they didn't kill enough people. It wasn't said by militants, it was said by FBI agents. They didn't say it because they wanted more blood but they understood that it would take more blood in order to get the governmetn to react. And now i'm hearing other FBI and other officials say to me, Steve, we're gonna need another 9/11" September 11 Shocking Discovery! - YouTube 9/11 - Time For Truth (2011) - 1of2 - YouTube 9/11 - Time For Truth is a look at some of the incidents surrounding and on 9/11/2001. Part 1 - Prior Knowledge Who Knew ? Part 2 - Osama Bin Laden Who Created the Prince of Terror ? Part 3 - Stand Down Where were the Fighter Jets ? Part 4 - The Towers Controlled Demolition ? Part 5 - The Media Media Coverup ? by rodder666 9/11 - Time For Truth (2011) - 2of2 - YouTube 9-11 Coincidence Theory - Full Version - 9/11 detailed evidence - YouTube This presentetion from 2007 is a detailed overview of the areas of evidence surrounding the events of September 11th, and the way that these observations clash with the official story. This presentation is not partisan, sensationalist or a means for presenting an alternative explanatory theory. STJ911 Blog » Blog Archive » Richard Gage Debates 9/11 Debunker in Front of the White House 9/11 SECRET REVEALED - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences - real name of documentary 9/11 Coincidences (1/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (2/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (3/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (4/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (5/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (6/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (7/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (Part 8 UPDATE) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (9/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (10/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (11/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (12/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (13/19) - YouTube

9/11 Coincidences (14/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (15/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (16/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (17/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (18/19) - YouTube 9/11 Coincidences (19/19) - YouTube 9/11 Chronology - Source Material : NA : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 1 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 2 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 3 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 4 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 5 - YouTube NIST debunked fire proofing debunked wall warping computer models temperatures exagerated floors disconnected columns bent inward 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 6 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 7 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 8 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 9 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 10 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 11 - YouTube 9/11 The Birth of Treason - Part 12 - YouTube Fritz Springmeier 9.10.11- 911 attack and the occult symbolism - Portland Oregon - YouTube poor audio. Fritz Springmeir, author, political prisoner, expert on secret societies and the occult, will discuss occult symbolisand ties to the illuminati, and the 9/11 Attcks.

High profile opinions

back to top

911 Proof - HIGH-LEVEL OFFICIALS doubting 9/11 Patriots Question 9/11 - 220 Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials 220+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials 1,500+ Engineers and Architects 250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals 400+ Professors Question 9/11 300+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members 200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals 400+ Medical Professionals Patriots Question 9/11 - 1500 Engineers and Architects Patriots Question 9/11 - 250 Pilots and Aviation Professionals Patriots Question 9/11 - 400 Professors Patriots Question 9/11 - 300 Survivors and Family Members Patriots Question 9/11 - 200 Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals Patriots Question 9/11 - 400 Medical Professionals Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Questioned | Conspiracy Hound Wing TV - Connect The Dots - The Whole World Knows: 9-11 Controlled Demolition by Victor Thorn 9/11 was the death of America - John Kaminski

OpEdNews - Article: Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report George Washington's Blog: Military Leaders Question 9/11 Outside the BluePill Cave: A summary of 9/11 skepticism Facebook - Ferdinando Imposimato - President of Italy’s Supreme Court Refers 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court President of Italy’s Supreme Court to Refer 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court Says that 9/11 was “False Flag” Terror, Just Like the Strategy of Tension in Italy Ferdinando Imposimato is the honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy, and former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy. Imposimato presided over several terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, other political assassinations and kidnapping cases and several cases against the Mafia. He is a former Senator who served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in three administrations. Imposimato is also a former legal consultant to the United Nations regarding institution of laws to control drug trafficking. This week, Judge Imposimato stated publicly in writing that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension” carried out in Italy. Specifically, the former Italian Prime Minister, Italian judges, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security”. Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fB6nViwJcM&feature=player_embedded Judge Imposimato writes that 9/11 was the exact same type of attack: an act of false flag terror. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/false-flag-2.html Judge Imposimato announced that he is going to recommend that the International Criminal Court hold a criminal trial into 9/11. Imposimato noted that the International Criminal Court was set up to protect the world from criminal acts of war, and that it is the perfect judicial body to hear such a case. Numerous High-Level Legal Scholars Agree That Additional Action Is Necessary Imposimato is not the only legal scholar to call for prosecutions and/or further investigations into 9/11. Many other high-level legal jurists, professors and trial lawyers have said the same thing. See http://l911t.com/ and http://911summary.com/legal.php . Note: Judge Imposimato is a member of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth and a panelist on the Toronto Hearings. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/president-of-the-supreme-court-of-italy-to-refer-911crimes-to-international-criminal-court.html — with Meena Jan, Gulwali Passarlay, Darius Anderson and Bro Lv Epsilonaasrfm. If We Learn Our History, We’re NOT Doomed to Repeat It - Washington's Blog ?Alan Sabrosky, US Marine Corps veteran-The Autograph-07-13-2011?? - YouTube 9/11 CONSPIRACY: ARMY GENERAL QUESTIONS PENTAGON STRIKE - YouTube Major General Stubblebine General of all American Intelligence: 911 was a fraud! (Albert Stubblebine) - YouTube Major General Albert Stubblebine: Towers Fell Down Because of Explosives | 9-11 News | World for 9-11 Truth | W9T.org Major General Stubblebine speaks out against 911 fraud - YouTube Confronting the Evidence - Jimmy Walter Confronting the Evidence 2:40:52 - 5 years ago Philanthropist Jimmy Walter analyzes 9/11 conspiracy, coverup Danny Jowenko is Dead, 3 Days After Sabrosky Interview Implicates CIA/Mossad in 911 | Ron Paul 2012 | Peace . Gold . Liberty

UK PM says Twin Towers were BLOWN UP !!! - David Cameron - YouTube Ex-Italian Prime Minister - '9/11 Carried Out By CIA and Mossad' // Current Ex-Italian Prime Minister - '9/11 Carried Out By CIA and Mossad' // Current http://tinyurl.com/34dc7e Ex-Italian President: CIA, Mossad behind 9/11 terror attacks : North East Truth “It’s common knowledge, he reveals, CIA, Mossad behind terror attacks” Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera: “All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe…know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.” Cossiga was elected president of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide election to become president of the country in 1985, and he remained until 1992. Cossiga’s tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment, and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio. This was a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 1960s, 1970s and ’80s. Gladio’s specialty was to carry out what they termed “false flag” operations—terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition. In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.” Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9-11 in 2001, and is quoted by 9-11 researcherWebster Tarpley saying “The mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.” Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga’s assertion that the 9-11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies is illuminating. It is one more eye-opening confirmation that has not been mentioned by America’s propaganda machine in print or on TV. Nevertheless, because of his experience and status in the world, Cossiga cannot be discounted as a crackpot. 9-11 SOLVED118 Michael Meacher and Andreas Von Bulow Express Doubts of Official 9-11 Narrative 1 of 2 - YouTube Michael Meacher - MP - Former UK Government Minister Andreas Von Bulow, Former German Secretary Of Defense Was 9/11 more than just an attack? Could the Bush administration have had anything to gain from the attack? Two prominent European politicians, Michael Meacher and Andreas von Bülow, express their serious doubts about the official version of the 9/11 story. Michael Meacher and Andreas Von Bulow Express Doubts of Official 9-11 Narrative 2 of 2 - YouTube Andreas Von Bülow On 9 11 - former German Member of Parliament and Government Defence Minister Andreas Von Bülow, former German Member of Parliament and Government Defence Minister. Andreas states that the Bush Administration was instrumental in staging the 9-11-2001 Attacks on America as part of a Geo Political plan that was outlined by PNAC "Project for a New American Century" written by the NEO CONS in 2000, and "The Grand Chess Board" written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997. 911 : Alex Jones/Andreas Von Bülow-911 Cover Up pt 1/4. - YouTube Alex Jones interviews Andreas von Bulow..first broadcast on April 15th 2008. Credit-alexjoneschannel. http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel http://www.infowars.com/

911 : Alex Jones/Andreas Von Bülow-911 Cover Up pt 2/4. - YouTube 911 : Alex Jones/Andreas Von Bülow-911 Cover Up pt 3/4. - YouTube 911 : Alex Jones/Andreas Von Bülow-911 Cover Up pt 4/4. - YouTube Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/11 Attack Lt. Col. Bob Bowman: "Who Were the [9/11] Conspirators?" - YouTube What NYFD Think About 911 - YouTube GOOD. It's a crime and the obscenity they tried to pass for an investigation is a coverup. BuildingWhat? on Geraldo Nov 13 2010 - YouTube http://buildingwhat.org. Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti appear on Geraldo to discuss the BuildingWhat? campaign for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7. Geraldo Rivera Confirms: "I'm a 9/11 Truther!" - YouTube aily News @ http://RevolutionNews.US ~ Judge Napolitano follows up with Geraldo Rivera on the WTC 7 Demolition... Napolitano calls Rivera "one of the most respected journalists in America." Rivera says his new open minded outlook on 9/11 is all because he "cares so much." Part deux of what appears may be an ongoing Fox and intelligence services psyops. The CIA and Mossad, among others, are gauging the responses to this limited acknowledgment of some basic 9/11 truths. Where this is leading is still speculation. It is not leading to full disclosure of what happened and certainly not to anything linking Israel. Fox and 'friends' will see to that. BuildingWhat.org ~ Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti appeared on Geraldo Rivera's show Geraldo At Large on Fox News to talk about the BuildingWhat? TV ad campaign and World Trade Center Building 7 for a short segment. http://world911truth.org/buildingwhat-appears-on-geraldo-atlarge-on-fox-news/ Investigative Reporter Geraldo finally jumps on the 9/11 Truth Bandwagon... why now? Is he "crazy and have a screw loose" like Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnel? WTC 7 DEMOLISHED ===== "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." —Thomas Jefferson Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera discuss Building 7 - YouTube better quality video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HcliJUk0VY&feature=related Geraldo Rivera Tells Bill O'Reilly Recent Domestic Terror Plots Are Fake - YouTube Lou Dobbs calls for a new investigation of 9/11! - YouTube Ex-CIA Ray McGovernTalks About 911 Truth on C-SPAN Book Review - YouTube 9/11 Family Group: Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera Are Right to Question Building 7 Collapse | 911Blogger.com Jesse Ventura on the Howard Stern 911 truth - YouTube Jesse Ventura Explains Why WTC7 Is The Key To 9/11 Being An Inside Job! - YouTube Governor Jesse Ventura on Fox News talking about 9-11 - YouTube 9/11 Senator Mike Gravel Explains Why There Should Be A New 9/11 Investigation - YouTube 9/11 TRUTH: Hollywood Speaks Out (Original HD Film) - YouTube Uploaded by WakeUpToTheNWO2 on Sep 5, 2011 TORRENT FOR DOWNLOADING: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6576771/9_11_Truth_Hollywood_Speaks_Out_2011_... Get On The Right Side Of History !!! Starring: Charlie Sheen (Actor: Platoon, Wall Street, Two and a Half Men) Alex Jones (Radio Host/Film Producer)

Daniel Sunjata (Actor: Rescue Me, Grey's Anatomy, The Devil Wears Prada) Jesse Ventura (Actor, Author, TV Host, former Governor of Minnesota) Dean Haglund (Actor: The X-Files/The Lone Gunman) Willie Nelson (Singer/Actor) Mark Ruffalo (Actor: Shutter Island, The Kids Are All Right) Rosie O?Donnell (Actress/TV Host: The View) Martin Sheen (Actor: The West Wing, Apocalypse Now) Geraldo Rivera (TV Host: Geraldo at Large) Also featuring: Aaron Russo (Film Director/Producer: The Rose, Trading Places) Al Franken (TV Host: Air America) Bob MacIlvaine (Victim Family Member) Christine Ebersole (Singer/Actress) Dave Mustaine (Musician/Singer: Megadeath) David Lynch (Film Director: Twin Peaks, Blue Velvet) Ed Asner (Actor: The Mary Tyler Moore Show, Lou Grant, Up) Esai Morales (Actor: La Bamba, Jericho) Gary Busey (Actor: Lethal Weapon, Point Break) George Carlin (Comedian) Gore Vidal (Actor/Author) Hal Sparks (Actor/Comedian: Queer as Folk, Spider-Man 2) Henry Rollins (Singer/Actor) Jeremy Glick (Victim Family Member) Jim Corr (Singer/Musician: The Corrs) Joe Rogan (TV Host: Ultimate Fighting Championship) John Schneider (Actor: Dukes of Hazzard, Desperate Houswives) Margaret Cho (Actress/Comedian) Michael Moore (Film Director/Producer) Prodigy (Rap Artist) Sam Harris (Singer/Actor) Other Celebrities who question 9/11 (listed at end of movie): Dick Gregory (Actor/Writer) Evan Dando (Musician/Singer: The Lemonheads) Harry Belafonte (Singer/Actor) Heather Thomas (Actress: The Fall Guy) Immortal Technique (Rap Artist) James Brolin (Actor: Marcus Welby M.D, Hotel; husband of Barbra Streisand) James Cromwell (Australian Actor: Babe, The Queen) Janeane Garofalo (Actress: The Truth About Cats & Dogs, 24) Juliette Binoche (Actress: The English Patient, Chocolate) Lou Dobbs (TV Host) Marion Cottilard (Actress: Inception, Nine) Matt Bellamy (Singer/Musician: Muse; engaged to Kate Hudson) Michael J Fox (Actor: Family Ties, Back to the Future) Michelle Phillips (Singer/Actress: The Mamas & The Papas, Knots Landing) Mimi Kennedy (Actress: Dharma & Greg, Due Date) Mos Def (Rap Artist) Nina Hagen (Singer/Actress) Patrice O?Neal (Comedian/Actor) Peter Coyote (Actor: E.T. - The Extra Terrestrial, Erin Brockovich) Roseanne Barr (TV Host/Actress: Roseanne) Sharon Stone (Actress: Basic Instinct, Casino) Spencer Pratt (Reality TV Personality: The Hills) Tom DeLonge (Musician/Actor: Blink 182, American Pie) Tommy Chong (Actor: Cheech & Chong's Up In Smoke) Woody Harrelson (Actor: Cheers, No Country for Old Men) DISCLAIMER: This film should be viewed as a whole body of work, as it is NOT about the life, career or CREDIBILTY of any one particular Hollywood Celebrity. Celebrities do have the right to FREEDOM OF SPEECH and are free to verbally express their own opinion (so long as it doesn't cause personal injury to others). Having said that, ALL comments containing personal insults and/or pre-meditated dis-information (aka Blatant Lies) will be DELETED and the user BLOCKED. If I wanted RESPECTABILTY, I would have made a boring film about the dozen or so ACADEMICALLY ACCREDITED scientists who have actually tested the World Trade Center dust and found UN-EXPLODED military grade NANO-THERMITE. This film is about Hollywood's GUT FEELING that something is just not right, and the dozens of UNANSWERED QUESTIONS they have. Jim Corr on the Late Late Show (21-1-2011) - YouTube (Good) Uploaded by UndefeatedArmy09 on Jan 21, 2011 Jim Corr & Christopher Monckton discuss the Climate Change Scam & also 9/11 being an inside job.Of course Jim initially wanted to talk about the Economic crisis but Ryan Tubridy (the Late Late Show host) barely let him get a word in about it. Reuploaded from: http://www.youtube.com/user/AZUREGLIDE Jim Corr on Saturday Night Show (NWO) part 1/2 - YouTube (Good) Uploaded by UndefeatedArmy09 on Feb 7, 2010 Jim Corr talks about the Body Scanners,Swine Flu,9/11 & the New World Order to Brendan O'Connor host of the Saturday Night Show on RTE. Jim Corr on Saturday Night Show (NWO) part 2/2 - YouTube Jim Corr on The Saturday Night Show - Full Length. - YouTube Uploaded by jimcorrtube on Feb 9, 2010 Jim Corr on The Saturday Night show in Ireland on 30th Jan 2010. The Saturday Night Show: Jim Corr - Short - YouTube Uploaded by rte on Jan 31, 2010 Jim Corr discusses his beliefs on 9/11, global warming, swine flu and airport scanners.

To watch the full programme to go RTÉ player. http://www.rte.ie/player

Charlie Sheen interview calling "official" 9/11 story a coverup Charlie Sheen on 9/11 - YouTube

Who did it?

back to top

Articles

back to top

9/11 and Israel: Alan Sabrosky’s Shocking Press TV Interview | Veterans Today JB CAMPBELL: Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11 : Veterans Today Breaking: Israel and ADL Coverup of 9/11 Exposed (Press TV Video) | Veterans Today Jews did 9/11 9/11 Missing Links 9/11 Nuclear Demolition of The WTC - by Dimitri Khalezov (Mike Harari details) 9-11 SOLVED118 The Information Underground • View topic - Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD truthjihad.com blog: Obama appoints 9/11 scriptwriter & master criminal Zelikow to Intelligence Advisory Board 9/11 Jewish-Mossad False Flag Archive: Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of studies at the US Army War College: Mossad, Jewish neo-cons, and Israelis orchestrated 9/11 attack Open Minds Forum - 9/11 Tower Pulverizations Explained - Nuked Mask of Zion: The 9/11 Delusion: Israel’s False Flag, Jingoism And Inhumanity Ex-Italy President - 9-11 Was CIA/Mossad Operation Ex-Italian President: 9/11 Was CIA/Mossad Operation « Socio-Economics History Blog Ex-Italian Prime Minister - '9/11 Carried Out By CIA and Mossad' // Current Ex-Italian Prime Minister - '9/11 Carried Out By CIA and Mossad' // Current Voices - ITALIAN SAYS 9-11 SOLVED Mossad - The Israeli Connection To 911 Christopher Bollyn News Of Great Interest Page XVIIII - Harari detailed Press TV’s Waqar Rizvi talks to Mark Dankof on Truth abut 9/11 « The Ugly Truth Northerntruthseeker: Israel Did 9-11, There Is Absolutely No Doubt Now: The People Are Speaking And They Are Angry! ISLAMIC-INTELLIGENCE: MOSSAD: The Israeli Connection to 9/11 truthjihad.com blog: Mossad agent Mike Harari implicated in Bali bombing, 9/11 - check out his false passports! Winter Patriot: Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment Conspiracy Planet - 9-11: Conspiracy - 9/11 Conspiracy: Nuclear Demolition of WTC (Harari) The Battle For World Supremacy - News BLACKFIVE: Non-Mastermind of Col Nick Rowe's killing scarfed up hernan serfaty - Google Search Osama-Berlusconi? «Trappola giornalistica». Corriere della Sera Who Did It? - Conspirators 9-11 Coordinated By Cheney Says Wayne Madsen Did Criminal Jewry Commit 9/11? | The Works and Research of ZionCrimeFactory

Gelatin B-Thing

back to top

The Art of the Prank » Blog » The B-Thing by Gelitin Pre 911 Intrigue – Gelatin – The B-Thing | The World's Prophecy Gelatin -- "The B Thing" - The Education Forum ekmiqd.png (PNG Image, 736x1046 pixels) 9/11 Gelatin: The B Thing - YouTube 911 - Hollow Towers part 1 - Jim Fetzer - B Thing - YouTube Jim Fetzer, Phil Jayhan, Larry McWilliams 911 - Hollow Towers part 2 - Jim Fetzer - B Thing - YouTube 911 - Hollow Towers part 3 - Jim Fetzer - B Thing - YouTube

Dancing Israelis

back to top

Mossad’s Dancing Israelis and a 9/11 Confession from Mike Harari | Dobroyeutro's Blog Mr. Friend's Blog: Israeli art students, Mossad and 9/11 9/11/01: Truck Full Of Explosives & Two Suspects In Custody Caught on George Washington Bridge : Federal Jack Five Dancing Israelis Lie About Their Involvement in 9-11! (New Clips Never Seen Before in USA!) - YouTube Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11 - YouTube Israelis Admit on Live TV they had Prior Knowledge To 9/11 ( 911 & The Dancing Jews ) - YouTube Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11 A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11. The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards. (1) Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2) "They were like happy, you know ... They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3) [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4) Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6) "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)

Cheering Israelis,Were they Tracking Hijackers pre 9/11 1/2 - YouTube A Counterpunch article examines unresolved questions over whether Israeli agents were tracking the 9/11 hijackers before September 11th. ABC's 20/20, The Forward, and Salon.com have all covered the story. But where's the follow up? Democracy Now Amy Goodman speaks with article's author Christopher Ketcham; Counterpunch editor Alexander Cockburn, and Marc Perelman, the Forward reporter who did one of the first reports on the story in 2002. Cheering Israelis,Were they Tracking Hijackers pre 9/11 2/2 - YouTube 9/11: Truck/Vanload of Explosives (CBS-ABC-WABC-CNN-NBC) - YouTube Compiled reports of a truck or van loaded with explosives near the George Washington Bridge in New York City

and FBI arrest of 2 to 3 suspects. Download clip: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=0MZBIFF0 9/11/01: Truck Full Of Explosives & Two Suspects In Custody Caught on George Washington Bridge - YouTube (FEDERALJACK) WCBS 10:40 PM EST, A full report on the men arrested by the George Washington Bridge with a truck filled with explosives. I have told the story many times about my personal experience in the command center at Giants Stadium when they arrested these guys. They were Israeli Mossad. Same with the 5 dancing Israeli men arrested in NJ. And the guys who were arrested by the NYPD in lower Manhattan after detonating a truck bomb. FULL ARTICLE WITH LINKS HERE http://www.federaljack.com/?p=92376 9/11 Vans: 'Splain This! - YouTube Here's what the arrested Israelis told the cops: "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html 9/11 WTC John Miller reports on van with explosives - YouTube Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11 - YouTube CNN on Jews Did 9/11 - YouTube Proof that Israel is responsible for 911, 1/2 - YouTube Zionism uses terrorism to furthure there political ambitions. Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained we must, above all, make it an international political issue.[1]Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome final solution of the Jewish question.[2]In his Diaries, page 19, Herzl stated Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.

Videos

back to top

Press TV - Proof Israel Did 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky Pt 1 - YouTube Press TV - Proof Israel Did 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky Pt 2 - YouTube ?Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11?? - YouTube // same as above ?Dr. Alan Sabrosky Traitors in our Government Allegiance to Israel 3-15-2010?? - YouTube The Military KNOWS Israeli AGENTS did 911 (Using Israel as a smoke screen cover) - YouTube 1. Alan Sabrosky — Was 9/11 a Mossad operation? on The Kevin Barrett Show - YouTube 2. Alan Sabrosky — Was 9/11 a Mossad operation? on The Kevin Barrett Show 3. Alan Sabrosky — Was 9/11 a Mossad operation? on The Kevin Barrett Show - YouTube 4. Alan Sabrosky — Was 9/11 a Mossad operation? on The Kevin Barrett Show - YouTube 9/11 TRUTH: Jewish Ex-Marine SPEAKS OUT on Israeli Involvement (MUST WATCH) - YouTube alan sabrosky 9/11 Israeli Mossad Job (1 of 4) Alan Sabrosky US Military War College - YouTube 9/11 Israeli Mossad Job (2 of 4) Alan Sabrosky US Military War College - YouTube 9/11 Israeli Mossad Job (3 of 4) Alan Sabrosky US Military War College - YouTube 9/11 Israeli Mossad Job (4 of 4) Alan Sabrosky US Military War College - YouTube The Military KNOWS Israel did 911 pt1 - YouTube (Phil Tourney, Alan Sabrosky) Phil Tourney : “What I Saw that Day” | USS Liberty Cover Up

Alan Sabrosky Pt1 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. You can email Dr. Alan Sabrosky at: docbrosk@comcast.net Alan Sabrosky Pt2 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky Pt3 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky Pt4 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky Pt5 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky Pt6 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Alan Sabrosky Pt7 of 7 100% Sure Israel - Rogue US Gov.did 9/11 - YouTube Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions - Re-edited - YouTube "mossad regularly fakes aussie passports" - YouTube 9/11 & Future Events - Eric Jon Phelps - YouTube Real Suspects of 9/11 - (MUST SEE) - YouTube This is not my video. I got this video from 911TruthAnniversary's channel. This video was made by a 9/11 reseacher named Kevin Ryan (not me). America Wakes Up. Jews Did 9/11 - YouTube America Wakes Up. Jews Did 9/11. Dr. Alan Sabrosky clips.

"9/11 was a false flag operation, I would tell this in a federal court" - Dr. Steve Pieczenik - YouTube Dr. Steve Pieczenik May 4, 2011 Alex Jones show An excerpt from an interview between Alex Jones and Dr. Steve Pieczenik entitled 'Bin Laden, The Oswald Like Patsy Died 10 Years Ago'. In this excerpt Pieczenik speaks about both 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden, though it was his statements about 9/11 that struck me as being very important so I've placed emphasis on that in the video title. Pt.1 of the full interview can be found at the link below where it was originally posted on May 3 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj0pM5FoYbs Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik says he is prepared to tell a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly 9/11 was a false flag attack Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job. Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist". He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT. Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop,

"the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government," while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world. Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush's election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus. The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik. Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been "dead for months," and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80?s. Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, "Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome," adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan. Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer. "He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it," said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai. "He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him," added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.... The above is an excerpt from Paul Joseph Watson's article at infowars.com, the article can be read in full here: http://www.infowars.com/top-usgovernment-insider-bin-laden-died-in-2001-911-... The 911 Solution the Big Clue Everybody Missed - Jerome Hauer - YouTube Missing Links - The Truth Behind the 911 Attack - YouTube iSRAEL Did 911 not Muslims Alan Hart interview on Current Issues TV Part 2. - YouTube Israeli Mossad Involvement In The 911 WTC Attacks - Part 1 - YouTube Israeli Mossad Involvement In The 911 WTC Attacks - Part 2 - YouTube Eustace Mullins - Mossad did 9/11 - The French Connection 2006 - 1 - YouTube Feb 7, 2006 - Eustace Mullins talks with Daryl Bradford Smith on Mossad 9/11 involvement, Rothschild Control and Government Funded UFO Disinformation Programs. Eustace Mullins - Mossad did 9/11 - The French Connection 2006 - 2 - YouTube Eustace Mullins - Mossad did 9/11 - The French Connection 2006 - 3 - YouTube Who Did 9/11? - PhD Kevin Barrett Speaks Out (Russia Today RT Interview) - YouTube 9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss - YouTube Who executed 9/11, Mike Harari? - YouTube 9 11 Prior Knowledge Ptech, Indira Singh, Yasin Al Qadi 12 6 2002 CBS - YouTube 9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss - YouTube Who Organised 911 ? Thomas P.M. Barnett - YouTube Israel is finished, top brass KNOWS who did 911 pt 1 - YouTube All Seeing Eye of Horus at Ground Zero During the 9/11 Memorial Service - YouTube Zionist jew admids that Israel planned 9/11 - YouTube Zionist Scumbag-Michael Chertoff Gets Pounded With 9/11 Questions - YouTube

Muslims Did Not Do 911 Proof Part 1. Zionist Jews Used Cruise Missiles & Then Falsely Blamed Muslims YouTube Muslims Did Not Do 911 Proof Part 2. Zionist Jews Used Cruise Missiles & Then Falsely Blamed Muslims YouTube Muslims Did Not Do 911 Proof Part 3. Zionist Jews Used Cruise Missiles & Then Falsely Blamed Muslims YouTube 911stealth Amdocs Comverse Odigo Zionism Controls Communications - YouTube israel DID 911 odigo - YouTube Former BBC Reporter Alan Hart Reveals 'Mossad' Involved in 9/11 on Alex Jones Tv 3/5 - YouTube BBC Alan Hart - Israel Mossad did 911 and Iran does not want Nukes - YouTube BBC Correspondent Alan Hart Discusses 9/11 being a Mossad Operation | Dobroyeutro's Blog BBC Correspondent Alan Hart discusses 9/11 being MOSSAD operation - YouTube Fox 9-11 Israel-Mossad Banned News Report - YouTube Carl Cameron Supports Questioning 9/11 - YouTube 911 and the Israeli Spy Ring Fox news 2001 part 1 of 2. - YouTube 911 and the Israeli Spy Ring Fox news 2001 part 2 of 2. - YouTube Israel is finished, top brass KNOWS who did 911 pt 1 - YouTube Israel is finished, top brass KNOWS who did 911 pt 2 - YouTube US Intelligence Agencies confirm Israel did 911 pt1 - YouTube US Intelligence Agencies confirm Israel did 911 pt2 - YouTube 911 Lies - YouTube 9/11 Cover Is Blown - The New Evidence Pt1 - YouTube Jeffrey Steinberg from Counterintelligence Review (Larouche) "Early this year, the National Archives released documents from the files of the 9/11 Commission, which were previously classified. Three of those documents, recently obtained by EIR, provide the ``smoking gun,'' proving the central role of Saudi intelligence, and the critical support role of British intelligence in the preparation, execution, and coverup of 9/11. The most significant of the documents, still partly classified, is a ``Memorandum for the Record,'' summarizing an April 23, 2004 interview with a Southern California-based FBI informant, who rented a room in his home to two of the 9/11 hijackers during 2000. Although the memorandum redacted the informant's name, other public sources have identified the man as Abdussattar Shaikh. His FBI handler has also been publicly named as Steven Butler." 9/11 Cover Is Blown - The New Evidence Pt2 - YouTube 9/11 Cover Is Blown - The New Evidence Pt3 - YouTube 9/11 WTC cutter beams sitting in Mossad hanger 17 in NY ? - YouTube Hanger 17 Owned by GUESS WHO ?

Pentagon (F77)

back to top

AA F77 - Pentagon @ 9:37 a.m

Articles & Links

back to top

Flight 77 and the Pentagon Crash - What Really Happened Here?

High-Ranking Army Officer - Missile Hit Pentagon Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates Depleted Uranium Used. THE 9-11 PENTAGON HOAX. WHY IT WASN'T HIT BY A BOEING 747. excellent article. 911Truth THE 9-11 PENTAGON HOAX. WHY IT WASN'T HIT BY A BOEING 747. Sun Jun 13, 2004 07:34 210.120.128.117 Critical Analysis of the Pentagon Building Performance Report This article looks at The Pentagon Building Performance Report (January 2003) by the American Society of Civil Engineers (available on the internet). The key conclusion reached is that the Report fails in its attempt to show that the structural damage caused to the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 was caused by a crash by a Boeing 757 aircraft. The main purpose of the Report seems therefore to be to back the official, untruthful story about the events of 9/11. However, part of the inconsistencies are so glaring that an intention of sabotaging the said main purpose cannot be excluded. The key conclusion is based on nine observations which can be divided into two categories based on whether they concern events prior to or during the crash of the aircraft. As regards the first group, the overall conclusion is that the approach of the aircraft and its being damaged cannot have taken place in the the manner put forward in the Report. This conclusion is supported by the following observations: the aircraft's reported 42º approach angle is not possible for a B-757; >> the aircraft's right wing's hitting a generator cannot account for the narrowness and discontinuity of the damage to the facade as proposed by the Report; >> the intact cable spools in the trajectory of the aircaft are incompatible with the information on the impact contained in the Report; >> and, there is no evidence to support the claim of the left engine having hit a vent structure; such a hit would also not explain the narrowness of the damage to the facade. >> For the second group, the overall conclusion is that the Report's description of the impact of the plane and of the damage caused manifestly contradicts photographic evidence from the scene. The description includes impossible, contradictory and unexplained phenomena: the allegation of the aircraft's fuselage sliding into the first floor has no physical credibility; >> the facade damage on the right side of the opening in the outer wall does not correspond to the shape, size and reported position of the alleged B-757; >> the facade damage on the left side of the opening are not suggestive of the proposed impact of a B-757; >> the tail of the aircraft left no visible marks on the facade while the Report in no way explains this; and, >> the Report fails to provide any kind of explanation for the hole in the wall of Ring C. >> The uncertainties related to the alleged point of impact as well as the approach angle, vertical position and inclination of the aircraft do not weaken the conclusion presented herein that the Pentagon could not have been hit by a Boeing 757 in the manner described in the report. This is because changing one of these factors to allow the better explanation of a particular damage (or the lack of it) renders the other damage even less comprehensible. NB. This author is aware of theories promoted to suggest that the Pentagon was indeed hit by a Boeing 757 which was destroyed before it (or all of it) hit the building. While this possibility cannot be excluded offhand - and the conclusions about the impossibility of a B-757's crash reached in this article may not be directly applicable to such a case - no substantial evidence has so far been produced to back up such a theory. Radiation & Another One Of Those Endless 911 'Coincidences'... 9-11 Research: Fire Suppression 9-11 Research: Hull Piece Large Picture of Pentagon Hole Pentagon 911 Attack. No Plane hit the pentagon. No Video shows a plane. Nose of Skywarrior Visible 9/11 Conspiracies - Pentagon - Conspiracy Science - Conspiracies and Myths Refuted, Debunked, and Explained 9-11 Research: Official Pentagon Investigations

A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON, NOT A PLANE StevenWarRan: June 2007 AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 77 PENTAGON VIDEO Pentagon 9/11 no plane - damage pictures Pentagon 9/11 extreme closeups of damage Hi Res photos 911, The Pentagon And The A3 Skywarrior Theory Flight 77 and the Pentagon explosion September 11th 911 - How A Young ‘Corporate Soldier’ Ditched His Pentagon Job After Surviving 9/11 To Live His Life Purpose | Cash Flow Experts Academy Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum > Pentagon Damage Analysis Emails to Mike Wilson - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum 9-11 Review: ERROR: 'The C-Ring Punch-Out Hole Was Made by a Warhead' The Quantum Flight Path Aluminum Foiled We Now Know Flight 77 Was Not Crashed Into The Pentagon El Al Flight 1862 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 9/11 Pentagon Pictures 9/11 Pentagon photos enhanced hullpiece.jpg (JPEG Image, 656 × 1000 pixels) skin_firetruck.jpg (JPEG Image, 500x369 pixels) plane imposed xox5.jpg (JPEG Image, 701x329 pixels) pentagon-debris-006-debris2.jpg (JPEG Image, 1728x1152 pixels) pentagon-debris-003-door.jpg (JPEG Image, 1760x1168 pixels) Bijlmerramp2_without_link.jpg (JPEG Image, 795x410 pixels) PENT04.jpg (JPEG Image, 400x300 pixels) pentagon-911-day12.jpg (JPEG Image, 1250x814 pixels) verticaltrajectory.jpg (JPEG Image, 2250x1476 pixels) blue6.jpg (JPEG Image, 1250x814 pixels) 200109139c_hr.jpg (JPEG Image, 1536x1024 pixels) facade-intacte-hte-def1.jpg (JPEG Image, 3008x1960 pixels) 20010911.JPG (JPEG Image, 1800x704 pixels) 010914-F-8006R-003.jpg (JPEG Image, 3008x1960 pixels) RTR2G2K.jpg (JPEG Image, 2200x1536 pixels) Former 9/ 11 Commissioner admits missile hit the Pentagon - YouTube Former 9/11 Commissioner admits missile hit the Pentagon - YouTube 9/11 Pentagon NO fatalities NO dead passengers - YouTube April Gallup - Was there a bomb in the Pentagon? - YouTube 9/11 Truth: Pentagon Eyewitness Bob Pugh Tells His Story - YouTube Former 9/11 Commissioner admits missile hit the Pentagon - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 1/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 2/8 - YouTube

Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 3/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 4/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 5/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 6/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 7/8 - YouTube Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 ~ 8/8 - YouTube The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself - YouTube 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE - YouTube Jamie McIntyre contradiction - YouTube The Jamie Mcintyre Live Feed from Sept 11 2001 - YouTube 9/11 CNN No Plane at Pentagon Original Footage - YouTube Only Aired Once About PENTAGON !!! - YouTube New Pentagon Video - STILL NO PLANE - YouTube Eyewitness Missile hit Pentagon on 9/11, No Plane, Government Confiscated 84 Camera Tapes - YouTube 911 Pentagon Footage Fraud - See the MISSING FOOTAGE! - YouTube Rare Top Secret Footage Of Pentagon Explosion - No plane - YouTube New Pentagon Footage - FOX - YouTube Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Suspicious plane debris... Proof AA77 (a Boeing 757) crashed at the Pentagon - YouTube Pentagon Wall Up Close Before Collapse CBS Live 9:57:43AM 9/11 High Resolution source - YouTube BBC Confirms NBC; Pentagon wall still up at 10:23, 9 Minutes after ABC showed it down - YouTube 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 11: eyewitness SEAN BOGER - YouTube Heliport Tower Air Traffic Controller Sean Boger (Pentagon Attack Witness) - YouTube USPP Helicopter - 9-11 Pentagon.JPG (JPEG Image, 1407x839 pixels) - Scaled (82%) flight77, NewsFollowUp.com, TransparencyPlanet, promote open biz/govt pentagonplane.jpeg (JPEG Image, 1438x675 pixels) 010914-F-8006R-006.jpg (JPEG Image, 3000x1968 pixels) - Scaled (38%) 800px-Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg (JPEG Image, 800x600 pixels) pentagon-debris-003-door.jpg (JPEG Image, 1760x1168 pixels) - Scaled (65%) Pentagon_on_9.11.jpg (JPEG Image, 1524x1012 pixels) 07mxk-big.jpg (JPEG Image, 2300x1201 pixels) - Scaled (50%) 07mxe0_3.jpg (JPEG Image, 1071x403 pixels) PassageMissile_Pentagon.jpg (JPEG Image, 1226x1824 pixels) 010914-F-8006R-005.jpg (JPEG Image, 3000x1955 pixels) DA-SD-03-17540.JPEG (JPEG Image, 1005x1565 pixels) - Scaled (42%) aldeilis.net Websites supporting "A 757 hit the Pentagon" “Identifying Misinformation”

WTC 1&2

back to top

WTC, F11 (North T1), F175 (South T2)

Evidence

back to top

Killtown's: WTC Photo Gallery Webfairy 911 Memorial Slow motion closeups from the day that changed our lives. Cameras were mute witnesses at 911. The footage I use was recorded live from television at the time of the events of the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, and the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon, by people all over the world. A video camera catches the action of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in 30th of a second increments. Slow motion can show what the naked eye misses. It is the same principle as Instant Replay. The camera has no agenda, conspiracy theory, no emotional involvement, no urge to hide and censor or make things up. The cameras provide evidence of the events of September 11, 2001. World Trade Center Demolition. Table of Contents - The WTC Report. Chapter 1 - The WTC Report. Chapter 2 - The WTC Report. Chapter 3 - WTC Three - The WTC Report. Chapter 5 - WTC Seven - The WTC Report. "Plane" In, Missile Out Second Hit Strangeness High-Technology Missiles Joel Meyerowitz : 9/11 Photographer "AFTERMATH: World Trade Center Archive" 911 photos 911wtcComplexAir.jpg (JPEG Image, 1024x1024 pixels) 09-18-01_Thermal_Map_from_JOE002120.pdf.png.jpg (JPEG Image, 1094x1337 pixels) World trade center tower core floor/column plan World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects - Civil Engineering - The University of Sydney FEMA misrepresented core structure of the Twin Towers. fig-1-4.jpg (JPEG Image, 400x534 pixels) wtccore.jpeg (JPEG Image, 1269x1747 pixels) wtcConstructionLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1269x1747 pixels) Cluesforum.info • FAKING THE RUBBLE photosoftorch-cutsteel - wtc7lies http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v411/DoYouEverWonder/WTC%20%20West%20Street%20Parking%20Lot/WTC1collapsemilitaryphotos28-1.jpg wtcCoreColumnsLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1024x768 pixels) wtcExtColumnsLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 609x750 pixels) wtcConstructionLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1269x1747 pixels) BBC News | AMERICAS | How the World Trade Center fell groundZeroAerialMarked.jpg (JPEG Image, 1401x1400 pixels) groundZeroBT1.jpg (JPEG Image, 700x575 pixels) wtc2Tilt.jpg (JPEG Image, 800x543 pixels) wtcCutColumnLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1373x962 pixels)

groundZeroJB1large.jpg (JPEG Image, 1394x877 pixels) WTC_04.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600x1200 pixels) GJS-WTC010.jpg (JPEG Image, 768x1024 pixels) WTC_09.jpg (JPEG Image, 1173x793 pixels) WTC_06.jpg (JPEG Image, 1177x797 pixels) gzexcavate3.jpg (JPEG Image, 1216x912 pixels) gzexcavate5.jpg (JPEG Image, 1216x912 pixels) GJS-WTC322-1024x768.jpg (JPEG Image, 1024x768 pixels) wtc703mu8.jpg (JPEG Image, 1000x660 pixels) wtc719nn0.jpg (JPEG Image, 422x331 pixels) a3yj4.jpg (JPEG Image, 400x450 pixels) http://de.academic.ru/pictures/dewiki/119/world_trade_center_site_after_911_attacks_with_original_building_locations.jpg

spire

back to top

wtccore.jpeg (JPEG Image, 1269x1747 pixels) 9/11 "spire" on NBC - YouTube The Spire Proves Demolition - YouTube The Spire and the Staircase - YouTube 911truth.dk - Key points Family Members Of Doomed 911 Flights 'Strangely Silent' About Irregularities and Inconsistencies Of Official Government Story World Trade Center Demolition -Explosives, not jet-fuel imploded thise towers 911Hoax.com - 9/11 Media Hoax 9-11 Research: North Tower Blueprints 9-11 Research: Twin Tower Impacts 9-11 Research: South Tower Before Impact 9/11 Chronology Video StillDiggin: Kai Simonsen: 9/11 Eyewitness Report Cards, Installment V MINOUR YAMASAKI 73, ARCHITECT OF WORLD TRADE CENTER, DIES - Obituary - NYTimes.com High Definition Clip of WTC Turning to Dust on 9/11 (Slow Motion) - YouTube South tower collapse slow motion HD - YouTube WTC 2 South tower collapse slow motion HD - YouTube WTC 1 North Tower Collapsing- Super HD 1080p and Slow Machine ! - YouTube 9/11 - Wtc 1 North Tower Slow Motion Collapse - (HQ) - YouTube WTC 1 Demolition slow motion - YouTube 9/11 WTC Steel And Concrete Pile Still On Fire 8 Weeks Later - YouTube 9/11 Rare World Trade Center Collapse Footage - (Dust) - YouTube JAMES FETZER: New 9/11 photos released 9/11: The Towers of Dust - YouTube 100% PROOF TWIN TOWER JUST TURNED TO DUST MOLECULAR DISSOCIATION - YouTube judy wood, but shows dust

Dick Oliver Says WTC Towers Would Not Fall Down To The Streets - YouTube En la terraza del World Trade Center - On the rooftop of the World Trade Center - YouTube 9-11 lies never stop - YouTube (medly of clipos fires, heat, etc.) Footage of destrcution from inside wtc building 5 NIST cumulus release 28 Steficek Gary videos - YouTube Uploaded by BLO383 on Nov 30, 2010 This is incredible footage showing the terrible destruction and damage filmed from with inside wtc 5 with very interesting comments from the blokes filming it most of the damage from inside reveals the extent of the destruction caused by either fire damage and falling sections of the towers hitting it causing floors to collapse leaving a great amount of destruction and damage to the building partially collapse

Suppressed Firefighter's Spliced Full Interview - CBS News raw footage - YouTube No Foul Language Allowed Here. Learn more at: http://www.911docs.net/ CBS Net Dub6 14 and CBS-Net Dub6 15 These heroic 9/11 firefighter's full story has been suppressed for over nine years now. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has just released over 6,000 of video clips to the public, due to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by The International Center for 9/11 Studies. I saw Jimmy Grillo on Larry King-9/12/2001, not once but twice because I couldn't believe my eyes and ears. Jimmy had two outbursts on the show, one clearly expressing explosions. He was abruptly "shut up" by King announcing an unscheduled commercial break. This is the original transcript of the show. http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/30/lklw.00.html When the commercial break was done, King's questioning suddenly shifted, having Jimmy answering questions like, Jimmy wanted to be a New York Fireman for a long time. I firmly believe that he was coerced on that show, as was Tyronne's testimony in the following year I firmly believe they were where Jimmy stated they were on the King show(The South Tower Lobby waiting to go to the North Tower). Not where Tyrone later claims they were(The Marriott). If you do not believe New York firefighters were coerced, go to: http://firefightersfor911truth.org/ and make an intelligent decision for yourself. Many secondary explosions were mentioned on television on the first days of 9/11. These soon magically disappeared from our news or sections were edited out. The "Official Story" is blatantly dishonest. Many of the original clips were saved by individuals and can be viewed here on YouTube or in documentaries. Here is another clip in it's entirety, that the public was never allowed to see. Were the New York Firefighters later told not to tell their stories? If they did talk, would they lose their jobs or worse? Many did tell their stories, regardless, and their stories can be found at: http://firefightersfor911truth.org. These are true patriots and they have some alarming stories to tell you. Not to take away anything from the heroic firefighters who chose to continue protecting New Yorkers from fires. This is a very revealing video of what firefighters were feeling, and experiencing that day. Maybe now that this is out, more firefighters might come forward and help save our beloved country. Was our news media and Congress coerced? "The anthrax attacks came in two waves. The first set of anthrax letters had a Trenton, New Jersey postmark dated September 18, 2001. Five letters are believed to have been mailed at this time to: ABC News, CBS News, NBC News and the New York Post, all located in New York City and to the National Enquirer at American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida": quoted from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=anthraxattacks&anthra... Then, there's our two Senators: Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, who survived the anthrax attacks. Thank you, Mr. Leahy and Daschle, we know that anthrax was not your first warning to back away from 9/11 questioning and to stop preventing "The Patriot Act". Please take a look at what happened to Senator Mark Dayton-911. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOqKMhbByfY Was the nonworking radio that Jimmy Grillo was banging in this video one of those famous alleged "Giuliani Scandal Radio's", please watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaCYEEO-58I&feature=related It is said that, those radios cost at least 121 firefighters their lives, that horrible day. New Yorkers can all do something by going to: http://www.buildingwhat.org/ Everyone can learn by going to Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth http://www.ae911truth.org/ Please sign their petitions, we need some testimony under oath without Federal interference. 9/11 Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobby - (excellent) - YouTube

Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings. Firemen discuss how bombs were going off in the lobby of WTC1 as they were staging to move up the building. They explain how the building had already been hit by the plane and fires were already burning. After two explosions in the lobby, a third went off and the whole lobby collapsed. I'm sorry 9/11 truth deniers, you now have another smoking gun that you can't deny! Firefighters Find Bombs On 9/11 - YouTube 9/11 - firemen , police saying there are bomb's in the buildings - YouTube 9/11 World Trade Center Tower Demolitions - Raw Stock Footage 2 (ITN) - YouTube 9/11 - Pat Dawson NBC News 9/11/2001. - YouTube Albert Churry, Chief Firefighter, said "secondary devices were planted in the building" NBC 9/11/01, 11:54 am - 12:02 pm (TN archive) Rare national news from Tennessee (central time zone) -- Thanks Xenomorph911WTC 9/11 "Reports of secondary explosions after the planes impacted....."(CNN) - YouTube Jeffrey Beatty, a security expert on CNN on 11th Sptember 2001. 9/11 News report WB11,11-30am til 12-39pm and 2-01pm til 3-18pm. - YouTube 8.45...eyewitness " explosion.."? 00.55? "we are hearing a number of large booms from that area" 20.50? eyewitness "sounded just like a bomb going off" 26.17 eyewitness " an explosion of smoke... " 32.15 eyewitness "an internal explosion in the building " New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside' - YouTube 9/11 Aftermath Looking Down On Ground Zero - WPIX - YouTube 9/11 The Trade Towers Seem To Have Disintegrated ... Almost Nothing Left Of Any Of The Floors - YouTube 9/11 World Trade Center Debris Removal Operations Two Months Later - YouTube WTC Angle Cut Columns during cleanup - YouTube WTC4. Where's the debris Another 911 miracle ignored by the 911 commission, FEMA and NIST. - YouTube "Ladder/Engine 10" refers to the firehouse outside of which a rug made of our republic's flag was laid on the public sidewalk and president bush, laura bush and their entire entourage walked on the flag of the United States of America to celebrate the 6th anniversary of the capitulation of America to our criminal owners. The day our elected leaders successfully attacked us and won. You may see this traitorous act here http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=m8Et_M4bdXo and here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xoEflHNohU The explosives need to destroy the lower parts of wtc2 totally destroyed wtc3, wtc4, St Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, a portion of wtc6, killed 2 people inside the elevator at 90 West (140 Cedar) and made a mess of the Liberty street side of the Ladder/Engine 10 firehouse. The explosives' plasma blasts came out perpendicular to the outer walls of the South Tower; objects to the side did not get blasted too much. For example, WTC1 was not harmed by the destruction of World Trade Center Tower 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWpwYkMhwAs (skip to the end) So, the men inside Ladder/Engine 10 probably escaped death, but we will never be told. They got a special mural showing the fake wtc smoke and a president showing his contempt for the constitution. Probably really great, unfunded, pension benefits also. Historically, money and death threats are great motivators! You can see by what is left of Wolrd Trade Center building 4; most of it was vaporized. I say the vaporization took 2 seconds in the video, but, in fact, realize that the lower floors were blasted out and the upper floors were not knocked over in the process - they came nearly straight down where they had been. You can see the extraordinary angle, the leaning toward Liberty street of the remaining roof that little of building four is left. The remains

of building 4 went thru literal free fall; the part of the building beneath the upper floors disappeared in milliseconds before the upper part could tip much. A wide swath between the remaining portion of wtc 4 and the remaining upper floors is devoid of any kind of wtc4 rubble. The aerial view shows something like a straight road blasted thru under there. Perhaps that is where the New York subway tunnel had been. Despite the manipulation of the image, it is still quite clear. Again, there were no fires evident or reported in WTC4 prior to 9:59AM September 11 2001 even after the south tower began its collapse as is evident in Evan Fairbanks' excellent video shown us by the heroes Peter Jennings and Connie Chung. The giant pieces of "chex" sticking into the Courtlandt subway station on Church St near the corner of Liberty changed the appearance so often because they were drawn into the images to block the view of the far more difficult to explain top of WTC4. Again, all in a matter of milliseconds. The 911 Commission apparently didn't notice that wtc4 was also destroyed, or, like the situation with WTC7, chose to ignore it. Here is the only thing they say about the destruction of WTC2 (The South Tower): "At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed [sic] in 10 seconds, killing all civilians and emergency personnel inside, as well as a number of individuals-both first responders and civilians-in the concourse, in the Marriott, and on neighboring streets. The building collapsed into itself, causing a ferocious windstorm and creating a massive debris cloud. The Marriott Hotel [WTC3] suffered significant damage as a result of the collapse of the South Tower. [Commission footnote 156: NEADS audio file, Mission Crew Commander position, channel 2, 9:42:08]" The pulling of WTC7 was done as a smokescreen to hide the vaporization of wtc4. To see what others have done in analysis, please Google WTC4 in images. While the timing issue exposed in this video is new, others observed the survival of the upper floors before Joe Craine. Based on TV coverage, there were a lot of people around church and liberty with cameras. Yet, the only images of wtc4 leading up to the destruction of the south tower is a couple of frames from evan fairbanks. WTC4 was not on fire, nor would we have expected it to be since it was perpendicular to all the official action. In the 10 seconds it took the south tower to be demolished, fire started, attacked all the lower floors structural supports and evaporated them leaving the upper floors leaning over behind those massive and fake, wtc2 chex sunk into Courtlandt station. Sincere thanks to Connie Chung, Peter Jennings and Evan Fairbanks for risking their lives in producing and televising the Fairbanks segment. We are idiots. No contract with Lucifer ever pays off. Faust lost. Put the teeth back into the bill of rights, starting with the 1st; break the media monopoly. The only reality of 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we were shown on TV was false. At the pentagon it was faked firefighting. Joe Craine, YouTube Martyr September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack - YouTube 9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies - YouTube shows temperatures of WTC. good. 9/11 - WTC1 Core - NIST FOIA Release - YouTube WTC1 Core NIST FOIA Video footage shot from a crane over Ground Zero during the clean-up. Close up shots of core coloumns and steel beams. 9/11 : NIST FOIA - Molten metal at WTC2 ( Luigi Cazzaniga). stabilized. - YouTube

WTC 7

back to top

911 Photos prove hoax Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation BuildingWhat? Appears on Geraldo At Large on FOX News 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE virginia. User ID: 934023 Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov I'll say again.. the morning it happened I was listening to wtop radio in DC. When (whatever it was) hit the Pentagon, they said it was a MISSILE. A few minutes later, they said it was a helicopter that slid off the landing pad. Never ONCE did they claim it was a

passenger jet. Later, they picked up the jet story, but live reporting said it was a missile. Cheney (or was it Rummy?) called it a missile too, then corrected himself. In the Pentagon video, you see the trace of an object moving parallel to the ground, not coming in at an angle. Remember the interviews from people on the road near the Pentagon. One woman said it (flew over her car) was much smaller than a jet and had NO windows. Like uh... a missile. I was convinced it was a missile WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein - YouTube Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges Silverstein Spills The Beans About WTC Building 7 - YouTube Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11? - YouTube Lucky Larry Silverstein EXPOSED - YouTube Physicist Challenges the Official 911 Story - YouTube BEHOLD! Collapsing & Exploding World Trade Center buildings by David Chandler - YouTube David Chandler discussed the WTC7 collapse (in much greater detail) and analyzed the North Tower's explosions on two separate occasions. David did not object to my combining the two talks. David Chandler's Website: www.911speakout.org David Chandler on YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: www.ae911truth.org Rudy Giuliani Thinks Building 7 Is A Joke: Rudolph Giuliani Confronted on Building 7 - YouTube Uploaded by NotForSale2NWO on Jan 27, 2012 http://www.bobtuskin.com http://theintelhub.com Bob Tuskin of The Bob Tuskin Radio Show confronts Rudy Giuliani over Building 7 and his possible role in 9/11. http://theintelhub.com/2012/01/27/bob-tuskin-of-the-intel-hub-confronts-giuli... Fair Use Notice: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This was covered in the local mainstream news paper: http://www.alligator.org/news/campus/article_bd201374-48ab-11e1-b8ef0019bb2963f4.html http://www.bobtuskin.com http://theintelhub.com/ http://rememberbuilding7.org http://truthfrequencyradio.com/ As former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani began his Thursday presentation on leadership, one audience member wanted to change the subject. "What happened with building seven, Rudolph?" a man from the audience at the Phillips Center for the Performing Arts shouted. "You are too rude to be entitled to an answer," Giuliani said as the audience member was escorted out. "May I suggest a barber and a haircut?" He responded with similar humor when a second audience member began shouting about the need for honesty. "Oh, get lost," Giuliani said. "It seems like I'm in New York. This could be Times Square. Any more clowns?" Once the audience settled, Giuliani illustrated his six principles of leadership: strong beliefs, optimism, courage, relentless preparation, teamwork and communication. Before the talk, mobs of people packed themselves outside the entrances to the orchestra section of the Phillips Center as officials conducted a routine security sweep, delaying the event. Those already inside were asked to leave and wait in the lobby. The doors opened at 7:25 p.m. and eager audience members pushed into the theater to hear the former New York City mayor speak. Giuliani took the stage at about 8:15 p.m. "It seems that security sweeps could be done before everyone started lining up," Gainesville resident Kelley Richardson said. "With that being said, I'd rather wait and see Rudy. I'm not going anywhere." Accent Speakers' Bureau paid the Washington Speakers Bureau $65,000 for the event, Accent Chairman Corey Portnoy said. The event was free and open to the public. The former mayor and 2008 Republican presidential candidate offered his six principles of leadership to an audience of about 1,500. Giuliani had the audience laughing throughout the speech, although he also mentioned the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks five times. Once Giuliani finished his speech, Portnoy asked seven previously screened questions from audience members. Portnoy asked Giuliani's opinion on which GOP candidate is the best choice to take on President Barack Obama in the 2012 election. "Take on President Obama? That's not much of a task," he said. "I think every one of the candidates running, with one exception, is ready for the task ... that one exception is Ron Paul."

Political science junior Marco Garcia, 21, said he thought Giuliani had a valuable message and delivered it well. He described Giuliani as "a true American hero." Garcia was not a fan of the protesters, however. "Regardless of party differences, whether you agree with the speaker or not, I think it is disrespectful."

R.I.P. Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 1 of 3 - YouTube R.I.P. Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 2 of 3 - YouTube R.I.P. Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 3 of 3 - YouTube WTC7 STUDY - Simon Shack Donald Rumsfeld Questioned About WTC 7 - Feb 2011 - YouTube Donald Rumsfeld - 9-11 - Mass Murdering War Criminal Donald Rumsfeld Building 7 on Mancow Meuller - YouTube Conspirator: Rumsfeld Feigns Dumb on Building 7 | BBN World News | Battle Hymn Broadcasting Network Kevin McPadden, 9-11 First Responder - YouTube Rumsfeld_and_Giuliani_at_Ground_Zero_cropped.jpg (JPEG Image, 1591x1214 pixels) 800px-Rumsfeld_and_Giuliani_at_Ground_Zero.jpg (JPEG Image, 800x579 pixels) Lower Manhattan : Fiterman Hall Fiterman News -- Borough of Manhattan Community College WTC 7 is about to "blow up" - YouTube WTC7 Messenger Sent to Warn of "Total Collapse of Towers" - YouTube Fox Reports Wtc 7 Collapse Before It Happens 9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7 - YouTube Building 7 Controlled Demolition - YouTube WTC 7 Foreknowledge - YouTube Phone Call With Danny Jowenko - YouTube Jeff from Canada called Jowenko and asked him a few questions about world trade center building 7 "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon." - YouTube WTC7 Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down v2 - YouTube WTC7 "Collapse" 911 Eyewitness w/ radio - YouTube BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell - YouTube 911 WTC bombing eyewitnesses - YouTube Italian debate show-WTC7 - YouTube

No Planes (F11, F175)

back to top

Boeing: 156' wing span, (63' each wing), 155' fuselage, 52' tail wing, 61' rear wing span (30' each rear wing) AA F11 -WTC 1 allegedly hit North Tower @ 8:46am Boeing 767-223ER (224 seats) 87 people (11 crew, 76 passengers) United F175 allegedly hit WTC 2 - South Tower @ 9:03am Boeing 767-222ER (224 seats) 60 people (9 crew, 51 passengers) AA F77 allegedly hit Pentagon @ 9:37 a.m Boeing 757-223 (224 seats) 59 people (6 crew, 53 passengers) United F93 allegedly crashed in Shanksville, PA @ 10:03 40 people (7 crew, 33 passengers)

Links

back to top

911 - WTC "No Planes" Evidence - a set on Flickr

911-dimitri-interview-review-redeux-v2 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! Boeing 767-200 | Airliners.net Chopper 5 Velocity Study by Ace Baker Aircraft Ops Boeing 767-300 luizmonteiro - Altimetry Calculations / E6B Emulator 911conspiracy.tv - 2nd WTC Attack Plane Crash Videos very good resource of clips

No-Plane Theory FAQ No-Plane Theory FAQ Q. How does this video prove there were no planes? A. It doesn't. This is merely a demonstration of the technique. For the proof, please see "9/11 Airplane Video Composites", linked above. Q. What about all the (hundreds, thousands, millions) of eyewitnesses? A. If a real plane flew into the South Tower, there would indeed be thousands, if not 10's of thousands of eyewitnesses. But there are astonishingly few people who actually claimed to have seen and heard a plane. The extreme LACK of eyewitnesses speaks in favor of no planes. There are a number of eyewitnesses, like David Handschuh, who were looking at the tower, and swear they didn't see a plane. The few eyewitnesses that do exist are either (a) lying or (b) mistaken. The govern-media has trillions of dollars, and a hundred thousand secret agents. Manufacturing "eyewitnesses" is no problem. And let's not discount false memory. Many studies have conclusively shown that fake video alters eyewitness accounts. Q. Wouldn't it have been easier to just use real airplanes? A. No. There are insurmountable problems with that. A real plane would mostly explode against the side of the much stronger building, they needed the plane to appear to completely penetrate. A real plane might miss the target. A real plane would leave real evidence, and it would be the wrong evidence, which might be seen by the wrong people. A fake plane leaves no evidence, unless you make a mistake, such as allowing the nose of the airplane to pop out the back of a layer mask (see Chopper 5). Q. What happened to the passengers and airplanes? A. The real planes took off as advertised, and were hijacked by special ops. The planes were landed at Stewart Air Force Base, and replaced on radar by false blips. The passengers and crew were executed, blood and body samples taken. These samples were then planted at the "crash" locations, "found", and then legitimate DNA testing was done. Q. But I saw an airplane crashing into the tower on live TV! A. No you didn't. On live TV, you were shown "Chopper 5" and "Chopper 7". Both of these video show a plane passing behind the edge of the tower, not hitting it. The videos that show the plane penetrating the building came later, after there was plenty of time to edit them. They look fake, because they are fake. Q. How could they create a fake airplane from so many different angles, and have them all match? A. Easy. First a 3D model of a single plane flight is modeled in a program like Lightwave or Maya. That flightpath can then be rendered from any virtual camera position. Q. What about the airplane parts that were found on the street? A. No parts were found BELOW the "impact" area, or in the gashes. The few parts that were found, were located BEYOND the tower, as if they made it all the way through and out the other side. I believe they shot an airplane part out of a cannon on the 80th floor of WTC2. That's what it looks like on the video. This would explain why the molten metal was seen pouring out of that location before the demolition. They had to melt down the cannon, lest it be blown clear during the demolition. Q. What about the phone calls? A. What phone calls? The only recording of any phone call is Betty Ong, early in AA11. That probably was a real phone call, after the real hijackers had taken over the plane, and before they landed it at Stewart AFB. As to the rest of the alleged phone calls, they don't exist. A "transcript" means nothing. What phone calls? Q. If there was no plane crash, then what hit the WTC? A. Nothing. It exploded from within. Q. What program did you use to create this, and was that available in 2001? A. I did this in Apple Motion. Various programs like Adobe After Effects have the same and better features, and have been available since the late 1990's. -Ace Baker

The no-plane theory for 9/11-- why it may not be as crazy as you think - Democratic Underground

Articles

back to top

SeptemberClues.info | The Central Role of the News Media on 9/11 Deconstructing the Grand Deception by Simon Shack - December 31, 2009 | Ron Paul 2012 | Sound Money, Peace and Liberty Killtown's: WTC Crash Videos (excellent) 911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake « 911justicehalifax collection of videos.

StillDiggin: 9/11 TV-Fakery... Hunt the Boeing (WTC) 2: Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax excellent article (on disk: 911 NOSE OUT - Calculations - TV-Fakery.pdf) StillDiggin: 9/11 WNYW FOX5 Blooper - "Jim Friedl": Eyewitness or Member of the TV Fakery WESCAM Crew? StillDiggin: 9/11 CNN Pipeline: As (the media wants you to think) it Happened StillDiggin: 9/11 TV-Fakery: 45 Degree UA175 Flight Path Discrepancy? StillDiggin: The Earth Is Not Flat StillDiggin: Evan Fairbanks 9/11 Video Fakery: The Monitor Theory What Happened to the Passengers? - The "4" Flights of 9/11 - Let's Roll Forums http://tinyurl.com/6mm2r92 911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake « Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier Its The Flash! – By Dave vonKleist « 9/11 Anomalies FBI Tells 911 Rescue Worker To 'Shut Up' Over Finding Airplane 'Black Boxes' confusing story that seems to be disinformation. Black Box Bombshell: NY Firefighter Claims FBI Recovered Data Recorders at Ground ZERO By Greg Szymanski 10 reasons why no planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 9/11 Airplane Affidavit By John Lear, Son Of Learjet Inventor | Pakalert Press Humint Events Online: People Who Should Have Seen UA175 Hit the South Tower But Didn't The Rest Of The 911 Street Engine Story http://tinyurl.com/a4y7v 911 Closeup - NO PLANES (good) The Gray Plane That No One Saw « Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier 911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake « Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier Boeing: Commercial Airplanes - 757-200 Technical Characteristics Boeing: Commercial Airplanes - 767-200ER Technical Characteristics American Airlines Flight 11 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia United Airlines Flight 175 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia American Airlines Flight 77 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

United Airlines Flight 93 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Boeing 767 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hollywood 9/11 - No Planes | THE POPULIST Hollywood 9/11 - Honoring the Vicsims | THE POPULIST Hollywood 9/11 - Addendum | THE POPULIST

Ace Baker - Psy Opera

back to top

Ace Baker's 9/11 Research - WMD at the WTC CollinAlexander - YouTube Ace Baker channel on youtube. Ace Baker proves no planes hit WTC on 9/11 - YouTube Ace Baker provides the best and most thorough analysis proving that real planes did not hit the WTC. Yes, it's very difficult to believe that the various videos and photos showing planes hitting the WTC on 9/11 were all digitally manipulated, and that the various lie-witnessed did in fact lie about seeing planes and that the media new stream was a controlled event, but the facts in this video leave no doubt. Note that there was absolutely no live footage showing planes hit the towers. Several attempts to debunk Ace Baker's analysis have failed including the most shameful attempt by Mr. Wright on the Hardfire interview with Ron Wieck. This video dismantles the attempting debunking by Mr. Wright, which people have used to claim this analysis to be wrong. Unfortunately for them, Mr Wright is wrong and his lies and misrepresentations are fully exposed. Watch this video in full and you be the judge.

Ace Baker chopper 5 fake - YouTube Hardfire DID A PLANE HIT THE SOUTH TOWER? / BAKER / WRIGHT / WIECK 07 - The Key - EXCELLENT - YouTube. In this first of two programs, Ace Baker presents evidence that all the video of a plane hitting the South Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, was faked. Steve Wright, movie special-effects expert, shows how Baker's claims are false. Ronald Wieck hosts. Originally aired May 13, 2008. Taped April 24, 2008. See the second of these programs at http://video.google.com/videoplay? docid=-2432158918700622833 Buy a high-resolution copy of this program on DVD at http://www.CreateSpace.com/224730 Buy a high-resolution copy on VHS or MiniDV at the program's web site above. Pictures by CollinAlexander - Photobucket 9/11 "No-Planer" Ace Baker's Fake Footage Claims Busted! - Part 1 - YouTube total disinformation attack on Ace Baker. 9/11 "No-Planer" Ace Baker's Fake Footage Claims Busted! - Part 2 - YouTube 9-11 # The Great American Psy-Opera (The Key Part 1) - YouTube 9-11 # The Great American Psy-Opera (The Key Part 2 ) - YouTube 9-11 # The Great American Psy-Opera (The Key Part 3 ) - YouTube 01 - Broken News - YouTube

9/11 - The Great American Psy-Opera 02 - The Official Story vs. The Truth Movement - YouTube 03 - Scholars for 9/11 Truth - YouTube 04 - Phenomena - YouTube 05 - Legally Challenged - YouTube This chapter highlights some of the strange details in the various legal actions brought by prominent 9/11 truthers Steven Jones, Judy Wood, and Morgan Reynolds. 06 - What Planes? - YouTube 07 - The Key - EXCELLENT - BEST - YouTube 08 - The Psy-Opera - YouTube LawsonTheForger - YouTube Trajectory with Building Damage Sketchup Match to Pavel Hvala Sandia Study.mov A Study of Mask Position in a Mod... What's in Naudet 1? Why, it's the image of a 767. I scaled a model 767 in and de-focused. It looks pretty close. No way would the perps ever show us anything other than a 767, they are not stupid. I sincerely hope this puts to rest all of Webfairy's nonsense about "no plane in Nuadet" or a "Flock of UAVs" or whatever she's onto now. Saying there is no plane in Naudet 1 is just an easy target for shills to make no-planers look bad. Simon Says Simon Shack, aka Social Service, of September Clues, wants us to believe the demolition videos are not real. This comment thread is reserved for Simon Shack, who may comment unedited. All others will be deleted. Please email me with any comments you may have. Simon's Folly 2 Using Geo-referenced objects, I am able to approximate the apparent sizes and positions of the V N bridge behind the WTC. All of the claims by September Clues regarding "layering", "virtual reality" etc. ARE FALSE. Simon's Folly Perspective Study of Verrazano Na... 9/11 Expanding Rising Mushroom Cloud 9/11 Blackouts Theory of Ghostplane Chopper 5 and the Missing Shadow 9/11 Live Airplane Composite Theory 9/11 Airplane Composite Theory Levitating Book Red Bull Can Hutchison Effect - Part 1 Hutchison Effect "Red Bull Can"

Hutchison Effect Boat The Hutchison Effect John Hutchison UFO Levitation Anti-Gravity Hutchison Effect Tesla's Dancing Screw Anti-Gravity Hutchison Effect on ... The Spire Disintegrates WTC1 Blown Up

Simon Shack - Nose Out

back to top

Index page • Cluesforum.info Reality Shack 911conspiracy.tv - FOX5 WNYW Chopper5 airplane crash footage - Fade to Black (excellent) NOSED OUT - YouTube NO planes on 9/11 - (nosed out alt) YouTube 911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman interview Suggests TV Fakery is Reality - (HIGH5 interview) - YouTube nosed out full video. Kai Simonsen is the video cameraman. See "07 - The Key" video Kai Simonsen was the cameraman in chopper 5 on 9/11 who took this infamous video of the alleged hit of UA175 into the south tower. PumpItOut Jeff from Canada aka DJ Shure refuses to heed Simonsen's plea that he can't talk about it and pursues until the quarry announces that the image of a plane is of greater propaganda value than the confounding altruisms of contrary reality. Full conversation here: http://shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi? board=911calls&action=display&... More info: http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-reportcards_16.html Thanks to genghis6199 for the video http://z15.invisionfree.com/911taboo http://www.pumpitout.com/planes.html http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice http://www.911movement.org http://www.nomoregames.net http://acebaker.blogspot.com 911 september 11 FOX NEWS chopper nose out UA175 WTC Twin Towers World Trade Center pumpitout shure tv fakery no plane theory no planers 911tvf wq2rx conspiracy ooda loop strategic paralysis information warfare vs. basic Newtion physics "Ozzy bin Oswald" ozzybinoswald 911 WNYW HIGH5 Good Day Nose-out, Judy Woodruff Knows - YouTube wtc 2nd plane nose right through building - YouTube UA175 - the last 12 seconds - YouTube 2nd plane in view for 25 seconds - YouTube Compare this video to "Where did this FRAUD come from?"THE longest view of alleged Flight 175 seen LIVE on 9/11 --on NY1-- at 0:15 -- uncompressed here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=O00PDYX9 zoomed with reverse for best view here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=HJX27MD8 How do I know it's the longest view of the plane? See my list: http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html 2nd Plane Hit on 9/11/01, Luis A. - (fake trajectory 2 vs Fraud video) YouTube

Impossible Speed

back to top

Boeing 757 & 767 max speed up to 8,000 ft is only 360 mph - Democratic Underground Operational Limitations for 767 Please Note: The limitations data contained on these pages is applicable only to the Boeing 767-300 with Rolls Royce RB211 engines, unless otherwise stated. MAXIMUM SPEEDS Bird Impact Protection From Sea Level to 8,000ft restrict airspeed to 313 kts* for Bird Impact Protection. Above 8,000ft,

observe Vmo / Mmo pointer and overspeed warning. *313 kts = 360 mph Source: 767.org.uk Operational Limitations for 757 Important Note: The limitations data contained on these pages is applicable only to the Boeing 757-200 with Rolls Royce RB211 engines, unless otherwise stated. MAXIMUM SPEEDS Bird Impact Protection From Sea Level to 8,000ft restrict airspeed to 313 kts* for Bird Impact Protection. Above 8,000ft, observe Vmo / Mmo pointer and overspeed warning. *313 kts = 360 mph Source: 757.org.uk (Knots to Mph converter) Speeds 9/11 planes flew at when they allegedly crashed: Flight 11 - 470 mph Flight 175 - 590 mph Flight 77 - 530 mph Flight 93 - 580 mph http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed "UA175 Aircraft" Speed Analysis - The WTC 2 Media Hoax ground speed vs altitude 9/11 - No Planes & Impossible Plane Speeds - YouTube FLight 175 speed challenge. 911 'planes' impossible speed. - YouTube 9/11 WTC impossible speeds confirmed - YouTube Jeff Hill calls Ben Eadie an aeronautical engineer who confirms that a Boeing jet cannot fly at +500mph at sea level. More phone calls at www.pumpitout.com Pilots for 9/11 Truth: Airplane speed - YouTube 9/11 pilots say "NO WAY"! - YouTube

Media Fraud

back to top

LiveLeak.com - World Famous 9/11 CNN Footage is proven FAKE 911 PROPAGANDA - YouTube HIGH5 Highlights The Impossible - YouTube NO PLANES ON 911 EXPOSED by FOX NEWS Expert Interviewee - YouTube CBS andNBC both miss 'plane' hitting - YouTube 9/11 Blackouts - fox, cnn, naudet missing time - YouTube Twin Towers - CNN ( Plane crash SLOW ) - YouTube CNN Fake Footage Blasted 9/11 - YouTube 911stealth v.7 CNN the "no plane" hit longer, voice superposed: Warwick - YouTube 911 NBC - eye-witness saw 2 explosions in Twin Towers, but no plane - YouTube 911 BBC - eye-witness Steve Evans saw second explosion(s) but no plane - YouTube 2nd Plane Impact: BBC World shot, 9/12 10:32 pm - YouTube footage from ABC has some interesting details - YouTube footage from ABC which has some intesting comments, of what people see, missile, plane, and other things never seen before.

Documentaries

back to top

September Clues (new version) - No Plane Theory - Breaking The Matrix - YouTube No passenger planes were involved in the attacks on 9/11. No plane hit the Pentagon. No plane crashed in Shanksville. No planes hit the twin towers. This documentary explains, how the mass media illusion was created in front of your eyes. Additional research is advised. This is the Full NEW Version (August 2008) All credits go to: Simonshak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE Socialservice' website: http://www.septemberclues.info/ Socialservice' channel on livevideo: http://livevideo.com/socialservice

SimonShak's You-Tube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/simonshack A high quality version (377MB) of this video is available via torrent from here: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4364004/September_Clues__NEW_ AUTHOR'S STATEMENT: SEPTEMBER CLUES - full version Were the 9/11 broadcasts totally fake computer animations? In order to make up your mind about this, please watch the Addendum here: SEPTEMBER CLUES addendum http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGyW-0MeBOU Here is the playlist of all my ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL02330024F0FA4A22&feature=viewall The so-called 'terror-attack' of 9/11 was nothing but a psyop or, in other words, a gigantic make-believe simulation. It was pulled off with the active support of the mainstream newsmedia - and their complicity continues to this day. The entire World Trade Center complex - 9 buildings in all - was of course demolished (in bright daylight - hidden behind a smokescreen ) but what we saw on TV was nothing but a prefabricated 'Hollywood' movie. No planes were involved (thus no passengers died) - and no people were killed in the (empty) twin towers. For the perpetrators to kill 3000 white collar workers in New York City would have been the silliest self-inflicted aggravation imaginable. Now, all this may come as a shock to many people. However, the evidence is overwhelming and has been consolidated by the steady efforts of independent researchers from all over the world - who have nothing to gain from spreading false information. Ultimately, it is up to every openminded individual to look at the available evidence for him/herself. However, please keep in mind that most 'conspiracy theories' you may have bumped into (such as Michael Moore's blockbuster "Fahrenheit 9/11" and the internet blockbuster "Loose Change") were created to uphold our illusion of living in a world graced with freedom of speech. For any questions you may have, you are welcome to contact me on my Youtube channel. However, please make sure you first get familiar with my website which contains a concise overview of this longstanding research: THE SEPTEMBER CLUES website http://www.septemberclues.info For those seriously interested in media fakery (such as 9/11 and other newsmedia-backed psyops), here is my discussion forum: THE CLUESFORUM http://www.cluesforum.info SEPTEMBER CLUES : Definitive Edition | 2008 (FULL VERSION) - YouTube September Clues produced by Simon Shack http://www.youtube.com/user/simonshack http://www.septemberclues.info http://cluesforum.info/ SYNCHED OUT http://www.blip.tv/file/4111297 Television is - and has always been - a Weapon of Mass Distraction. The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11 deception. Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media, it will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably, the imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional relation to it. The way we relate to news imagery has an almost hypnotic effect on our psyche: we have come to consider the visuals of any given news story as proof of that news story's authenticity. This is truly a 'weak spot' of our brains' readiness for critical-thinking. Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a catastrophic event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name: "Weapon of Mass Distraction". The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that 'weak spot' of ours. We all fell for the images we saw on TV at the time -- understandably so, as the sheer horror of the proposed imagery generated a wall of outrage and fear -- thick enough to discourage any critical review of it. In hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV coverage proposed by all the major networks. WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11 The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part what were meant to be "chopper shots" of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of "Action Shots" ("Planecrash" and "Tower collapses") amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts ! Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these "Action Shots" depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV - (or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11

conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event. Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives. WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ? The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to 'sell' a fictitious terror attack to the world-- by replacing the real-life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air Defense. It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN. WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ? All the other videos (endlessly replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and compared - and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-generated fabrications. PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT MY WORK AND ALL CREDIT GOES OUT TO SIMON SHACK. SEPTEMBER CLUES EPILOGUE (NEW) - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES A - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES B - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES C - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES C - no planes diff camera angles - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES D - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES E - YouTube RESEARCH UPDATE - SUMMER 2010: The precise purpose of the 17-second audio signal heard on all TV Networks now has a plausible, logical explanation. When aligning/synchronizing all networks we may see that the first appearance of the "plane" is at (minus)-16 seconds before impact. We can then see the "plane" uninterruptedly during those 16 seconds, in 4 sequential shots seamlessly split on CBS/NBC/CBS (again)/ and finally on ABC. Indeed, these 4 seamless "plane-shots" never overlap each other, as if each of the 4 "cameramen" were assigned to capture only their own, exclusive chunk of the "plane-approach" ! Now, what are the odds of THAT occuring in the real world? More likely, what I call the "16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE was a prefabricated animation, cut in 4 pieces and distributed on the various phony TV broadcasts. So, the BEEBEEP (and its variants) heard 17 seconds before impact was likely the "GO!" signal for the centralized studio producer to launch that ready-made16 SECOND SEQUENCE. As the WTC exploded in reality (at 9.02.54, as correctly- & scientifically - recorded by the Lamont-Doherty seismic Observatory) someone cued the studio with that BEE-BEEP signal. This is why the officially released impact time had to go with the (false) 9.03.11 timestamp. For more detailed explanations, please go to : THE 17-SECOND ENIGMA http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2055659#p2055659 NOTE: Of course, all this implies that the "planecrash" video sequence was manufactured well in advance of 9/11. There was no need for any real-time insertions as the entire Manhattan aerial scenery was a digital construct. The only need for real-time control of the 9/11 Live TV imagery would have been the smokeplume animation (in order to match the day's wind direction) : such adjustments can be easily made 'on the fly' within a 3D animation environment. However, this evidently didn't work out too well : when comparing the smokeplumes of the various TV network feeds, a great number of discrepancies and aberrations can be observed. SEPTEMBER CLUES F - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES G - YouTube SEPTEMBER CLUES H - YouTube

SEPTEMBER CLUES L'EPILOGO (Sott. ITALIANO) 11 Settembre9:59 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES L'EPILOGO (Sott. ITALIANO) 11 Settembreby trickyRE22,038 views SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 1 (Italiano) 11 Settembre Questa serie di video mostra, in modo efficace, gli eventi dell'11 Settembre sotto una nuova luce. Nel dibattito su quanto accaduto quel tragico giorno, é sempre più evidente il COINVOLGIMENTO DIRETTO DEI MEDIA e il RUOLO CENTRALE DELLE FALSIFICAZIONI VIDEO nelle immagini trasmesse in diretta Tv e nei cosiddetti "video amatoriali". Nell'EPILOGO di questa spettacolare serie di video, si cerca di rispondere alle comuni domande degli scettici... F.A.Q. - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION: 1) E allora i testimoni nelle strade di Manhattan? 2) Cosa sarebbe accaduto se qualcuno fosse riuscito a fotografare il missile? 3) Cosa ha causato quegli squarci nelle torri a forma di aerei? 4) E allora i quattro aeroplani se non sono caduti, dove sono ora? 5) Cosa dire delle famiglie dei passeggeri, sono anche quelle false? Aprite gli occhi! Il ruolo delle falsificazioni dei mainstream media é stato cruciale negli eventi di quel giorno! IL FUTURO DELL'UMANITA' E DELLA "DEMOCRAZIA" E' A RISCHIO, SE LA STORIA PUO' ESSERE SCRITTA IN DIRETTA TV DA UN'ÉLITE CRIMINALE... Per informazioni, fonti e riferimenti: www.livevideo.com/socialservice SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 2 (Italiano) 11 Settembre9:57 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 2 (Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE246,438 views SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 3 (Italiano) 11 Settembre9:59 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 3 (Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE110,257 views SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 4 (Italiano) 11 Settembre9:59 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES - Parte 4 (Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE66,168 views SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 5 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembre9:58 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 5 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE45,267 views SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 6 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembre9:59 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 6 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE48,838 views SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 7 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembre9:57 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 7 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE54,295 views SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 8 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembre9:55 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 8 (Sottotitoli Italiano) 11 Settembreby trickyRE33,417 views SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 9 (Sottotitoli ITALIANO) 11 Settembre9:54 Add to SEPTEMBER CLUES Parte 9 (Sottotitoli ITALIANO) 11 Settembreby trickyRE37,110 views THE PLANE FACTS - YouTube 911 AMATEUR part1 - YouTube Older video. New SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info Please watch SEPTEMBER CLUES before leaving any comments on this video, thanks : http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list? p=FAFFDE39F342242C 911 AMATEUR part2 - YouTube 911 AMATEUR part3NEW - YouTube 9/11 Taboo 1/3 - YouTube 9/11 Taboo 2/3 - YouTube 9/11 Taboo 3/3 - YouTube 911 Taboo - The WTC Plane fraud (1/4) - YouTube

911 Taboo - The WTC Plane fraud (2/4) - YouTube 911 Taboo - The WTC Plane fraud (3/4) - YouTube 911 Taboo - The WTC Plane fraud (4/4) - YouTube 9/11 - The Destruction - Part 1/2 - YouTube no planes awesome (see Dimitri Khalezov folder) 9/11 - The Destruction - Part 2/2 - YouTube Multiupload.com - upload your files to multiple file hosting sites! 9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part1 - YouTube 9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part2 - YouTube 9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part3a - YouTube 9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part3b - YouTube A September Story (1/4) - YouTube A September Story (2/4) - YouTube A September Story (3/4) - YouTube A September Story (4/4) - YouTube WTC No Plane Truth (Part 1) - YouTube Watch Flight 175's nose go into the South Tower and come out on the other side still intact??? This clip is from "September Clues" from mastermind Simonshack. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 2) - YouTube Compare/contrast the different views of the alleged Flight 175. This clip is from "September Clues" from mastermind Simonshack. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 3) - YouTube Compare/contrast the different views and audio of Flight 175's impact into the South Tower WTC No Plane Truth (Part 4) - YouTube WTC No Plane Truth (Part 5) - YouTube Watch two views of Flight 175 "melt" into the South Tower with no backlash of debris at all WTC No Plane Truth (Part 6) - YouTube Compare the witness accounts from actual people on the scene to news anchors watching the footage from the news studio or TV WTC No Plane Truth (Part 7) - YouTube A comprehensive look at all of the views and angles of Flight 175 that were recorded on 911. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 8) - YouTube A comprehensive look at the flight path of Flight 175 in many of the clips recorded on 911.

WTC No Plane Truth (Part 9) - YouTube An audio comparison of the many video clips of Flight 175 recorded on 911 WTC No Plane Truth (Part 10) - YouTube A logical look at the possibility of the planes striking the WTCs WTC No Plane Truth (Part 11) - YouTube Is this the NYC skyline on 911 with a rainbow of fruit flavors or CGI? Most of this clip is from "September Clues" from mastermind Simonshack. Unfortunately he, a wtc maintenance guy, committed suicide this week. Some say he was silenced as a warning to other witnesses. He was very vocal that there was no planes. RIP? WTC No Plane Truth (Part 12) - YouTube Watch the clip and focus on the black object coming in from the right of the screen. Is this a plane? WTC No Plane Truth (Part 13) - YouTube The famous moving bridge. Watch the Verrazzano bridge, which is approx. 7 miles away from the Towers move in many of the clips recorded on 911. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 14) - YouTube Compare the flight paths of all the video clips of Flight 175 WTC No Plane Truth (Part 15) - YouTube An evaluation of many clips of Flight 175 and the lack of wake vortex WTC No Plane Truth (Part 16) - YouTube An evaluation of New York Daily News Photographer David Handschuh's photograph of the WTC at the exact moment Flight 175 allegedly struck the South Tower. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 17) - YouTube An evaluation of the similarities of the clips shown on many different TV News Stations. Clips extracted from 911 Taboo and September Clues. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 18) - YouTube An evaluation of the gash that appears on the North Tower directly after impact that is shown in the Naudet Bros. film, but is absent in other clips of the North Tower. WTC No Plane Truth (Part 19) - YouTube A logical look at the possibility of the planes striking the WTCs WTC No Plane Truth (Part 20) - YouTube

Hijackers

back to top

7 Of 19 'Hijackers' Alive After 911 - New OBL Video A Phoney http://tinyurl.com/7gkd3zp

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Hijack 'suspects' alive and well http://tinyurl.com/r5xn Revealed: the men with stolen identities - Telegraph 9-11 "Hijackers" Identified by FBI: Seven Are Alive and Well allAfrica.com: Morocco: Dead Saudi Hijack Suspect Resurfaces, Denies Involvement allAfrica.com: Dead Saudi Hijack Suspect Resurfaces, Denies Involvement 9-11Review 9/11 Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake - YouTube Killtown's: 9/11 Hijacking Charts - Crash Stats Killtown's: 9/11 Hijacking Charts The 9/11 hijackers are alive - YouTube 9/11 Hijackers ALIVE! - YouTube Connecting the Anthrax Attacks to September 11th--Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Guns & Butter - pt1 - YouTube Connecting the Anthrax Attacks to September 11th--Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Guns & Butter - pt2 - YouTube Connecting the Anthrax Attacks to September 11th--Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Guns & Butter - pt3 - YouTube Connecting the Anthrax Attacks to September 11th--Dr. Graeme MacQueen on Guns & Butter - pt4 - YouTube

Naudett Brothers

back to top

Jules Gédéon Naudet 911 fake documentary The Naudet Brothers's 911 Reviewed http://tinyurl.com/5ne5q tinyurl (dot) com/5ne5q JULES NAUDET'S FIRST PLANE SHOT WAS STAGED http://tinyurl.com/7tpe5cu tinyurl (do) com/7tpe5cu Jules and Gedeon Naudet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 9/11 (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Naudet Video of North Tower Impact: Jules Naudet's 9/11 Film was Staged The incredible vanishing Naudet brothers | Social Democracy Now http://tinyurl.com/2gfntv tinyurl (dot) com/2gfntv 911 Hoax Splash Page ?cartoonplanes's Channel?? - YouTube Facts not Fairies N-911 Foreknowledge Alert 9/11 FILM WAS STAGED Naudet Second Hit ?911stealth WTC1 Jules Naudet "Saw" AA Logo So Fast Between 2 Bldgs?? - YouTube 9/11 What's in Naudet? - YouTube

People Waving

back to top

still-alive.jpg (JPEG Image, 640 × 475 pixels) 5. This is the Picture from the woman in Tower Two (South Tower). I think. there is a man laying next to her on her right side. Look behind her. This is obviously where the plane entered the building. How much fire do you see? If this is Tower Two, it fell after only 50 minutes. where is the fire that “melted the steel”? and if the steel was so hot it became deformed, why can she lean against it? woman waving out of wtc - YouTube WTC1 On Fire - Waving people - (Best) - YouTube 9/11 New FOIA Zoomed Footage of Person Waving and Explosions - YouTube Woman in the WTC hole inferno (never seen before photos) - YouTube Amateur Video - people waving - YouTube

Videos

back to top

Where did this FRAUD come from ? - NOSED OUT calculations - YouTube 9/11 - No Planes and Impossible Plane Speeds - Playlist - YouTube My playlist of videos showing that real planes did not hit the WTC on 9/11. 9/11 NOSED OUT - Calculations prove no planes hit WTC - YouTube No real Planes @ 911 - No Vortex - YouTube ATTENTION! On all Videotapes of the 1st and 2nd strike there is no Vortex visible. I came aware of this when Factfinder general on Pilots for Truth told me half a year ago. Back then Rob Balsamo, Pilot, made me skeptic saying that the Heat of the Explosion, are to hot to be affected by the Vortices. But then i came awayre of these Videos who clearly show that even in Napalm fire, Vortices are still present, as in normal Air. Watch the 911 Videos in HD and look closely, there is no turbulence in the smoke or fire. This is only possible when there where no Planes. This might look as a small piece to the perps, but is in fact hard evidence. Pre planted charges can look nice, but cant reproduce the real effect of Jet Engines Turbulence/Vortices. http://s15.invisionfree.com/911taboo/ Fake Planes 911 an Established Fact...Video by PAGANlNO - YouTube 911 taboo genghis 6199 - YouTube genghis6199 iis now GTV911 9/11 The Altered Flight 175 Plane Video The FBI Did Not Show On TV - YouTube // ac comment: This video clearly shows digital manipulation. See frames at 32-34 second mark. The digital pixilation of the "plane" actually blots out the crane's pole that is supposed to be located in front of the plane. This is imossible without digital manipulation. The crane's pole and the crane should never appear to be distorted since the "plane" is flying behind it (i.e. beyond the crane). At 40 second mark, you cna see what appears to be the nose of the plane come out. Again, at the 1:18 mark, you can see the same sequence slowed and zoomed further. The crane's pole is clearly being distorted for no reason, along with the plane itself suffering strange pixilation. The worst part is at 1:39 when the pole section dissapears completely. This is IMPOSSIBLE. Even if you beleive the crane's pole is actually located beyond the plane, the frames do not support this either since there are points where the crane is clearly in front. ----------- Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation Penttbom Unit, Video NE518 released in Nov 2008 under FOIA. This video copy came from the raw original NIST FOIA #20 file clip # 3. This video was classified for 7 years and not shown to the public for a good reason, and its not because Bin Laden might get a copy. "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that

prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling. Following a certain number of flying hours or, in the case of landing gears, a certain number of takeoff-andlanding cycles, these critical parts are required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by specialist mechanics. When these parts are installed, their serial numbers are married to the aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft records and the plans and scheduling section will notify maintenance specialists when the parts must be replaced. If the parts are not replaced within specified time or cycle limits, the airplane will normally be grounded until the maintenance action is completed. Most of these time-change parts, whether hydraulic flight surface actuators , pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components, are virtually indestructible. It would be impossible for an ordinary fire resulting from an airplane crash to destroy or obliterate all of those critical timechange parts or their serial numbers. I repeat, impossible. The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode. With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious, but small hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's alleged version of what actually caused the total destruction of the WTC buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. It is time to apply the precautionary principle. As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history. Footnote: It will soon be ten years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.) The National Transportation Safety Board has announced on its website that responsibility for the investigations and reports have been assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but there is no indication that mandatory investigations were ever conducted or that the reports of any investigations have been written."Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) -- Commander of Aircraft Maintenance and Logistics.Aircraft Accident Investigator. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career. Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic. Charlie Rose No Plane roundtable - YouTube No Planes? WTF? Over 120 years of experience here in photographing New York, one guy even capturing the explosion.... yet NONE saw ANY planes. WTC: Can 767 Aluminum Wing Cut 14'Steel? Crash Test Shows .. - YouTube Pilots For 9/11 Truth Presents "9/11 INTERCEPTED" - (Full Film) MUST WATCH! - YouTube Uploaded by Cincinnati911Truth on Aug 10, 2011 Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org to order your own personal high quality copy to share with friends and family. Thank you for your support! War Games, Simulated radar tracks, aircraft exceeding their max operating limits by more than 130-150 knots, inaccurate aircraft position

reports, false aircraft target reports, aircraft converging -- flying virtually in formation with -- and then diverging from reported 9/11 aircraft, fighters launched in the wrong direction, aircraft seemingly still airborne after the alleged attack, poor communications, phones not working.... What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were our defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.

9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (1/7) - YouTube Preamble There are two major aspects: circumstantial evidence and forensic evidence. Both are discussed in this essay. The No-planes Position relies entirely on the forensics, which prove TV Fakery and the usage of unconventional weaponry. The circumstantial aspect is merely supportive. The forensic evidence can be subdivided into three major parts: 1. Fakery which is proved by very close inspection of all available video footage, and 2. Application of the known and immutable Laws of Physics to the resulting plane-shaped holes and subsequent demise of the buildings, and 3. Critical analysis of eye-witness reports indicating impossibilities, and therefore discounts them as either fantasy, or incorrect interpretation of events (confusion in many cases, based on the 'officially-planted bullshit') and "plants," "shills" and actors beginning with Sean Murtaugh of CNN who were hired to lie. This essay only proposes to touch on the aforementioned, because each is a wide subject in its own right. That is why this essay is entitled "The No-Planes Position", not "The No-Planes Theory". The theory is something that requires study in depth. And, furthermore, this is ongoing as more and more is discovered. And that, to a very large extent, is the problem. Because in-depth study and very critical thought are demanded, "No-Planes" is easily dismissed by those who cannot - or will not - take the time to undertake that work, leading them to dive for the 'safety' (but irrationality) of 'hugging planes'. Irrationality? Yes. Since it is wellknown that so much of the Official Fantasy is bullshit, there is absolutely no reason why it can't all be bullshit. The only essential truth being that the World Trade Centre Complex was 'erased from the face of the earth', taking almost 3,000 lives with it. Under everyone's noses, and before our very eyes. How that happened is another matter. http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm What Planes_ No more games. The Lamestream media lies to us continually. 9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (2/7) - YouTube I've said elsewhere that 9/11 was a Psy-Op. I've already said the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement" was preplanned, and the various "Truth Heroes" were pre-ordained as a part of the planning. I've said that for the simple reason it is obvious. If you want to create The Perfect Crime, then you cannot afford to leave clues. But you will always leave clues, because The Perfect Crime does not, and cannot, exist. So it is absolutely essential to have a means of directing every critical thinker away from the real clues, by substituting pseudo-clues. The pseudoclues are what so-called "Truthers" follow, and hold dear to their hearts. Consequently all the various prominent "Truth Heroes" are actually "UNTruth Heroes", promulgating (in unison) the pre-ordained pseudo-clues. The socalled "9/11 Truth Movement" is, in actuality, a "9/11 UNTruth Movement". What is also pretty obvious is that "No-Planes", the real truth (being very, very deep) was not planned for. It was not expected that this depth of research would be undertaken. It was expected that the plausibility of the "UNTruth Heroes" would be sufficient to quell any fluttering hearts. And, to a large extent, the perpetrators were correct in their assumptions. The position of these "UNTruth Heroes" is readily dismissible by the media in all its various forms (articles, videos, etc). Let alone any court of law. In practice, a "Truther" can see that "something is wrong with 9/11". So they look around on the Internet. And find some information, which will, generally, lead them right into the arms of .... Alex Jones! Who will gently guide them right into the box that was waiting to capture, entrance, and beguile their mind. And make sure they never, ever, start thinking for themselves. Worry no more! Alex knows! He's on your side! Fighting the InfoWar. From "deep behind the enemy lines!". Yea. Have you ever listened to his show? Of course you have. You can say anything you like on his show, if you call in (as long as isn't profane - according to him!). And as long as it supports, or defers, to him. Any critique, however mild, will get the caller talked

(ranted) over, cut off, and left holding a phone with a dial tone. Meanwhile Alex will "Thank him/her for the call. Much appreciate it". This is the Alex Jones version of "freedom of speech". If it isn't Alex Jones, then it might be some more 'up market' organization, such as Scholars for 9/11 Truth or Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. However the result is always the same: You become entrapped in an alternative morass of (now "Inside Job") bullshit. This makes you a Truther? No, this makes you a beguiled UNTruther. And lastly. For crying out loud, wake up! Cointelpro promotes "beguiling plausibility". That's their job. What is beguilingly plausible about The No-Planes Position? Wake up to reality! "No-Planes" is the deep truth that 'they' did not expect to be revealed, and therefore wasn't fore-planned. "Beguiling" it certainly is not. Jim Fetzer's reaction was (and I quote) "Even if it were the truth, I wouldn't speak it". How's that for "beguiling"? The idea of "letting the chips fall where they may" seems to be to then re-arrange them nicely, so as not to seriously offend anyone, or seriously rock any boat. And that goes for Alex Jones, Richard Gage, Kyle Hence, David Ray Griffin, Steven Earl Jones, and all the other so-called "Truth Heroes" (and Heroines). All those who promote "beguiling plausibility", in fact. [Author's Note: It seems, at the time of writing (July, 2008) Jim Fetzer has - to some extent - changed his mind, after actually looking at the No-planes evidence. The Scholars for 9/11 Truth website now contains 5 fundamental points appertaining to TV Fakery on 9/11. I'm not sure why this is. During my few months on his Scholars Steering Committee in 2006, both Rick Siegel & I pushed this information under his nose at every opportunity, eventually resigning in disgust. The remainder of those mentioned above seem - as far as I have been able to determine - to still be parroting the same old pseudo-clue disinformation] "Truthers" stick to the truth. "Truthlings" stick to beguiling plausibility. (Which is why they are called that) In essence, in reality, this is all "politics", isn't it? Someone once said "Politics may not the the oldest profession, but the results are the same". http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm 9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (3/7) - YouTube Background From the No-Planes Position there are five aspects. Each of the four 'planes', and the destruction of the World Trade Centre Complex (actually as a whole). You see, the No-Planers don't ignore Buildings 3 through 6, like everyone else does. No-planers look at all the data. Also including Hurricane Erin. So there is an immediate difference between them, and the UNTruthers.. By the end of the day, 11th September, 2001, there were no World Trade Centre Complex buildings standing. Seven very large steel-framed buildings were reduced to (the minimum of - an almost negligible amount of) rubble. Yet all the surrounding buildings, including the World Trade Centre Financial Complex were still standing. Damaged in some cases, but not beyond repair. Noplaners find that curious. (UNTruthers obviously don't. Perhaps it's too much trouble? Or is it just far easier to endlessly the discuss the melting point of steel?) The So-Called Planes Well, there were four of them, we are told. Here are the established facts about them (based on what we have been told): AA11, Tail Number N334AA, no entries in the BTS Database for 11th September 2001, de-registered 14th January 2002 AA77, Tail Number N644AA, no entries in the BTS Database for 11th September 2001, de-registered 14th January 2002 UA175, Tail Number N612UA, does have entries in the BTS Database for 11th September 2001, de-registered 28th September, 2005 UA93, Tail Number N591UA, does have entries in the BTS Database for 11th September 2001, de-registered 28th September, 2005 What is immediately curious about this is: a) The lack of entries, in the BTS Database, for the American Airlines flights is indicative that they did not actually exist. Therefore, before proving that AA11 hit the North Tower, and that AA77 hit the Pentagon, their very existence needs to be proved. And no such proof has ever been forthcoming. But that doesn't worry the UNTruthers. However it does worry the No-planers. b) The fact that American Airlines decided to de-register both of their craft on the same day is indicative of a 'sudden realisation' that 'maybe they ought to do that'. After all, they should have done it by midday on the 12th September, 2001 (by law). (If the 'planes' were real, that is). Or could it be that N334AA & N644AA carried on in service, were old, and were, indeed, de-commissioned in January 2002 in case some 'plane-spotting Anorak' noticed? c) Similarly (b) applies to United Airlines, except that their own 'realisation' took more than three more years. Or could it be that 4 more years of service were squeezed out of N612UA & N591UA, before someone decided that 'some plane-spotting Anorak' might just notice? (Actually one did, and

pasted up a photo of N591UA taken during 2003. But that disappeared very quickly) The Bureau of Transport Statistics' entries are automatically computer-collected. Adding false entries is readily possible of course. Deleting entries is much more problematic, because all references and linkages to it have to be accurately removed, in order to coincide. How often have you clicked a link in a Webpage and been returned "Error 404. URL not found"? Here the target has been deleted, but the link (the reference) still remains, which indicates its prior existence. That's the problem with deletion. Other linkages indicate a 'prior existence'. In the case of AA11 & AA77 'other linkages' cannot be found. Either the deletion was unbelievably thorough, or there never existed anything to delete. And then, of course, the Official Fantasy would be supported by entries for them, not by the omission of the relevant entries. Alternatively if some Official Fantasy mileage is gained by the omissions, then why weren't the corresponding entries for UA93 & UA175 also deleted? The No-Planes Position is that flights AA11 & AA77 are not even proved, whereas it is accepted that flights UA93 & UA175 existed, and took off. Noplaners do not, necessarily agree that both of these flights contained any passengers. On balance they accept that UA93 most probably contained passengers. And, in all probability, all of them. This essay now continues by discussing the 'easy stuff' first (in order to clear the decks ready for the 'hard stuff'). 9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (4/7) - YouTube The Pentagon No-planers fully agree with Thierry Meyssan, and general "Truthage". Flight 77 did not even exist (see above), and certainly did not hit the Pentagon. No-planers do not, therefore, see themselves as heretics in the Pentagon context. The eye-witness reports have been thoroughly and critically examined, and found to be either 'flights of fancy', obvious 'attention-seeking' or just plain 'confused thinking'. If you wish to counter those statements then you will need to investigate all available reports yourself, and come to your own conclusions. But what you do not have the right to do is to criticize (or dismiss) the research that has been done by the Noplaners, until you have done your own. Shanksville While, on the one hand No-planers accept that UA93 existed, and took off, they do not agree that it crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A critical analysis of the "Shanksville hole" completely refutes any contention of a commercial airliner crashing there. As for Flight 93, the information in Loose Change, 2nd Edition is considered likely to be correct. In other words that UA93 landed in Cleveland Ohio, reporting "a bomb on board". It is likely that any passengers were taken to the disused NASA Hanger and 'never seen again' (until their DNA was examined. This explains how there was actually some DNA available for pathological examination). So No-planers do not, therefore, see themselves as heretics in the Shanksville context. The North Tower hit The North Tower was probably hit by 'something'. Some 'flying object'. But this was certainly not a commercial airliner. What one has to go on are a couple of videos of the 'event', an indistinct audio, but a whole lot of aftermath video forensics. One of the videos (the Czech one) is so indistinct (having been taken by accident so far away from the crime scene) it is really quite impossible to make out very much in any detail. Even if this video is not faked, it still indicates a 'flying object', as opposed to a commercial airliner. The audio track (of a phone call made at the time) does not indicate the sound (deafening scream) of a commercial airliner, travelling at some 450mph in close proximity to one of the callers. The major piece of impact evidence comes, of course, from the Fireman's Video taken by the Naudet brothers. This has been very carefully assessed. What does it show? Fundamentally it shows three 'triangular blobs' impacting the North Tower. Extrapolating these 'triangular blobs' into a full-blown commercial airliner requires feats of imagination that No-planers simply cannot attain. But there is a lot more. If this video is slowed down to frame-by-frame it is possible to identify 'missing frames'. This indicates that some kind of 'editing' has been performed. Consequently suspicions rise. But then it gets worse. Close inspection shows the 'object' entering the building, and then - after that - external damage appearing to create the 'commercial airliner shape'. It is submitted that, if the Cause was the impact of a commercial airliner, then the Effect (the plane-shaped hole) would appear as the plane was entering the building, and not afterwards. How can a plane enter a building without creating a hole as it does so? For more information you will need to check out Rosalee Grable's Website (MissileGate) And there is even more. A researcher by the name of Leslie Raphael produced a seminal work, in the form of a critique of the Naudet Video. In this essay he establishes at least 65 reasons why the circumstances surrounding it are

questionable. For example, Mr. Raphael wonders how it was possible to obtain the actual shot of the hit bearing in mind all the circumstances (tall buildings surrounding) - how the cameraman managed to direct the camera, fix the zoom control, and hold the camera at the correct position, at the correct angle, etc. etc. all by 'happenstance'. And all this without the strange part. That "Naudet" is a close anagram of "Duane St". And the fact that - years later - who has heard anything of these once-famous "Naudets"? The No-planer's heresy is to say that the North Tower was hit by "Blobs11", not AA11. http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm 9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (5/7) - YouTube The Demise of the World Trade Center Complex This has prominently been laid at the feet of a substance called 'thermate'. Originally this substance started life as 'thermite' but - when it was pointed out that thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive, thermate was hastily called in, so as to bolster the otherwise failing hypothesis. Unfortunately the bolstered hypothesis still fails quite miserably. Simply because it does not explain more than a small fraction of the data that has been uncovered over the last few years. It has also been pointed out (by Drs. Reynolds & Wood) that 'thermate' is unknown in the Demolitions Industry (they use substances called RDX and RDEX). The question is often raised, against the No-planers, in the form of "Where did the massive amount of necessary energy come from, then?". This omits to ask the question "Where did the massive amount of necessary thermate energy come from, then?". The answer to both of these questions is the same "Is the WTC Complex still standing? No? In that case the necessary energy came from somewhere". And the rider "To consider that it all came from (highly accurate and precisely controlled) thermate is utterly preposterous". There is little doubt that all the buildings were pre-wired for their eventual Demolition Day when they were built. In other words the wiring, and cutting charge sequence was undoubtedly known from day one. But the laying of the detonators, and actual explosive charges, would still have been a massive task, particularly in view of the fact that the core was protected by asbestos. It is hard to imagine that demolition would not have involved the removal of these coatings as a pre-requisite. While, on the one hand, there is undoubtedly probably quite lot of truth in this Blogger's point of view, she omits to point out that charges have to be measured out, sized, and placed very accurately, and that ain't no 5-minute job. Hey! No problem! According to one of Steven Earl Jones' audios "thermate can be painted on" (and then "touched off" by some radio-controlled mechanism . The Great Professor does not explain whether you use a brush, or a roller, for the paint job - and is a bit 'light' on details of any 'radio control" mechanism to trigger off this 'toshing'. The point is this: It has to work. It has to work exactly, no 'messing' It has to work accurately, otherwise the building will topple. We should all be very grateful that former Professor Jones does not actually work in the Controlled Demolitions industry - and merely confines himself to making absurd statements about it) Shutting down the buildings on weekends prior to 9/11 does not begin to address the massive amount of work involved in placing the cutting charges. But it does provide the cover for one of the mechanisms suggested by Dr. Judy Wood. Which is that "the shutdown enabled something to be installed, which was utilised to facilitate the destruction that occurred. Possibly a gas that could be pumped throughout each building via the air-conditioning system. This providing the target for Directed Energy (derived from Nikola Tesla's work), and causing the pluming that emanated from each Tower ...even though the fires themselves were, to all intents and purposes, out. Yet the buildings continued to project massive plumes into the sky. Possibly this was not fire-smoke, but something else?" This is only a suggestion. Research is ongoing. (For example: One's attention here needs to be drawn to the fact the Building 7 was emanating fumes from one whole side (prior to it's demise). That is one whole side, top-to-bottom, and front-to-back. Either every single window in this side was broken (and it was fire-smoke), or it was the building itself disintegrating. The fumes completely obscure the actual 'source') (Another example: Is that the groundshakes caused by Buildings 1 & 2 were 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter Scale, respectively. This is equivalent to "a large hand grenade". The groundshake due to Building 7 measured 0.6 on the Richter Scale. This is equivalent to a Pneumatic Drill i.e. a Jackhammer. How could this be? Answer: Most of the material went UP, not down) http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm

9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (6/7) - YouTube Supplemental The 'lack of any evidence for commercial airliners" was detailed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds in his article We Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories (2006), including major reasons why 'commercial airliners could not possibly have dunnit'. Dr. Reynolds has also done a number of presentations which can be found on the Internet (YouTube being a good place to look). In-depth analysis of the video forensics was initiated by Rosalee, The Webfairy (largely by posting frame stills initially), and has been taken to new heights of dynamic analysis by socialservice, via the September Clues series of videos. Furthermore Rosalee, herself, is still very active in this respect. In-depth analysis of the demise of the entire WTC Complex is ongoing via Dr. Judy Wood. At the time of writing Judy is attempting to establish all the data, and as many curious aspects of the destruction of the Complex as are possible. Her conclusion, or assessment, of how it was done has not yet been reached. However the 'thermate hypothesis' was thoroughly ruled out, based on the initial data that was available. What? Why are No-planers called "No-planers", when they are prepared to admit the existence of UA93 & UA175? Those were planes, weren't they? Exactly. No-planers are simply pointing out the TV Fakery. The "No-Planers" tag is the invention of the UNTruthers, and assigned by the them, in complete ignorance - because they never bother to "Make sure brain engaged before putting mouth into gear". And cause themselves to be called Truth Goblins, Truthlings, and Planehuggers, etc., in retaliation). No-planers do not dispute the existence of two of the commercial airliners. The only dispute is whether or not they took an active part in the impacts. No-planers assert that, by carefully analysing all the data, it can be proved these airliners did not take any active part in the impacts. http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm 9/11: The No-Plane Chronicles (7/7) - YouTube Conclusions 9/11 was, to a very large part, a TV Fakery hoax. That much is clear. Therefore mainstream media complicity is clear, and the efforts (against all odds) to debunk "9/11 Conspiracy Theories" - even from within to so-called "9/11 Truth Movement" - is also clear. How the WTC Complex was actually destroyed is not clear at this time. But it is beginning to look as though some kind of "molecular disassociation" technique was used in order to destroy it (pulverise everything, and toast the vehicles, etc.). And that includes Building 7, as well as 3, 4, 5 & 6. It should be noted that Ground Zero has not yet fully recovered, even at the date of writing this article (mid-2008). Whatever technology was utilised caused some kind of 'chain-reaction' which still continues, and will not stop. 'Nukes' can probably be discounted because of the lack of heat thrown from the buildings. There were even reports that, within the dust clouds, temperatures actually reduced from the ambient temperature at the time. Subsequent to the passage of these 'dust clouds', vehicles were 'toasted' - but people were not. There are no reports of 'toasted people'. Subsequent cancers may very well be due to the massive amount of asbestos thrown into the air, and the general toxicity anyway. Appendix 1 - Researchers The names of the initial Noplanes Researchers has already been documented in my essay on the real 9/11 Truth History: Jared Israel (inadvertently, by virtue of detecting "Inside Job") Illarion Bykov (inadvertently, by virtue of detecting "Inside Job") J. McMichael (inadvertently, by virtue of detecting "Inside Job") Gary North (inadvertently, by virtue of detecting "Inside Job") Thierry Meyssan (Pentagate) Scott Loughrey (by virtue of detecting/supporting "Controlled Demolitions") Jeff King (PlaguePuppy) (by virtue of detecting/supporting "Controlled Demolitions") Jeff Strahl (by virtue of detecting/supporting "Unconventional Controlled Demolitions") Gerard Holmgren (by virtue of detecting/supporting "Unconventional Controlled Demolitions", and eventually "TV Fakery") Rosalee Grable (Webfairy) (The initial TV Fakery detector) Nico Haupt (Support, and too much research to document, including the Steven Earl Jones-Los Alamos connection ) Leslie Raphael (definitely inadvertently, he was very surprised when I told him) Rick Siegel (by virtue of videotaping what happened, and maintaining the authenticity of it against all the odds) ... latterly picked up by Dr. Morgan Reynolds & Dr. Judy Wood. (Which spawned a multitude of others, far too numerous to mention. But you know who you are) My thanks to them all. http://www.veronicachapman.com/links/NoPlanes.htm

Who shot this 9/11 video of the 2nd plane? - (fake trajectory 1 vs FRAUD) YouTube f175 showing fake plane 9/11 twin towers frame by frame. UFO or motor 3:08 - (fake) YouTube 9/11 UA flight 175 - " Something is not right !!! - YouTube The last 12 seconds of the alleged flight UA175 - refined - YouTube UA 175's Final 18 Degrees Of Banking Turn - YouTube 9/11 Explosion in the South Tower 9:03am NY1 - YouTube cartoon flight 175 - YouTube the spiegel clip with zoom out - YouTube ONE WING DISAPPEARS in live shot 9/11/01. WPIX Dub3 03.avi Nist cumulus release 14 - YouTube 911 is a lie - YouTube Political Murder Techniques: The Camera Planet Scam - YouTube Action and Reaction (good) - YouTube Dr. Reynolds exposes 9/11 TV fakery on FoxNews - YouTube 911 truth 767 Pilot say's no way the planes or terrorist are real - YouTube 9/11 fake © 10 reasons why no plane hit WTC (©New Audio©) - YouTube The "Dose Of Reality" Radio Show with Brian And Justin. - The Real News Online.com Simon Shack interview with Justin Cooke.

Another No Planes Video on 9/11 - YouTube The Plane Animations That Fooled The World - YouTube 9/11: Total Proof No Planes Hit The Buildings! - YouTube 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane - YouTube South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers - YouTube John Lear - 911 Remote Controlled Planes & No Plane - YouTube Angle 2 - YouTube - 9/11 Second Plane Crash Angle 3 - YouTube - The Israeli Mossad On 9/11 Killtown on Fetzer show (Aug 19, 2008) - discussing No-Planes Theory 2nd Plane Missed - Michael B. full length raw - YouTube ?9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part1?? - YouTube The facts of the No Plane Theory - how stuff works: All claims are stolen from videos like "september clues" or "9-11 amateur". This manifesto shows the nonsense behind these claims and clues. It's a parody. In the past some people believed it anyway. Use your brain and don't believe anything! ?9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part2?? - YouTube ?Very Simple to understand: 9/11 = NO PLANE "Lesson 7"?? - YouTube 9/11 Fake: Basic Crash Physics 101 - YouTube 911 Passengers Could be Fictitious - Part 1 - YouTube 911 Passengers Could be Fictitious - Part 2 - YouTube ?Fake passengers on 9/11. Hartwell and Fetzer.?? - YouTube

Missing 9/11 Planes - YouTube Another No Planes Video on 9/11 (anchors see explosions, no planes) - YouTube ?David Von Kleist Speaks on 9/11?? - YouTube LiveLeak.com - 9/11 In Plane Site - Mistery Explosion [Dave VonKleist] 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors - YouTube?? Detailed analysis of the WTC video footage. Show sfake smoke coming from the WTC towers, shows how TV anchors did not see a "plane", etc. etc. Exposing the method used by the media to fake the plume of smoke seen on some of the 9/11 footage. The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. ?9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors (short version)?? - YouTube A shorter version of my 10-minute video "Smoke & Mirrors" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS0dNaseISM Exposing the method used by the media to fake the plume of smoke seen on some of the 9/11 footage. The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. 9/11 tv fakery video 911 fake smoke mirrors alex jones hoi polloi 9-11 vicsim simulated victims wtc nufffrespect september clues simon shack vicsims alex jones hoi polloi 9-11 vicsim simulated victims. Highlights of Bob & Bri's 9/11 video NO ? THEORY - 119 Reasons Why I'm A No-Planer - YouTube Dedicated to Disinfowarrior Jason Bermas '119 REASONS WHY I'M A NO PLANER' 1) The dearth of plane debris at all of the four crash sites 2) No matching of debris found with actual official planes via serial numbers 3) Not one tail section found or observed from the four crashes though tails survive all crashes 4) No wing tips breaking off in 2nd hit videos 5) No broken off wing tip sections photographed or reported being recovered 6) Not one of hundreds of metal seat frames from the planes photographed or reported being recovered 7) None of four black boxes recovered from ground zero, officially 8) Initial eyewitnesses to the south tower hit described a missile 9) The lack of deceleration as UA175 goes into the south tower 10) The lack of significant deflected debris as UA175 goes into the south tower 11) The lack of anything clearly breaking off the plane as UA175 goes into the south tower 12) Discontinuous dust cloud pattern from UA175 as it goes in the tower in the Hezarkhani video 13) The lack of any alteration in the course of UA175 as it goes in the tower 14) The impossible behavior of UA175 acting indestructible as it goes in the tower then shattering to bits once inside the tower 15) The lack of any explosion as the fuel-filled wings of UA175 make impact with the thick steel columns of WTC2 16) The lack of any significant fire from the port wing of UA175 17) The explosions on tower façade away from impact site as UA175 goes into the south tower 18) The abnormally large explosions produced by wingtips as UA175 goes into the south tower 19) The way the wings of UA175 initially slice into the tower in videos, cleanly with no deflected debris, with an unnatural straight edge along the spot of entry 20) The strange tube-like explosion that appears under the fuselage of UA175 in the Hezarkhani video 21) Parts of the south tower hole become larger after plane has already passed through 22) The south tower hole is completely blocked by debris and broken columns, which contrasts the way the plane slips into tower without slowing or breaking up on video 23) The discrepancy in engine puffs (above wing versus below wing) between Fairbanks and Hezarkhani videos 24) Plane path discrepancies in different 2nd hit videos 25) Odd coloring/tinting in several 2nd hit videos 26) The readily available technology to insert digital objects, such as planes, into video (for instance see Ace Bakers work) 27) The ability of the blue sky on 9/11 to act as natural blue screen 28) Live shot of 2nd hit is same camera feed for CNN, ABC, Fox—they all showed helicopter shot at same key moment

29) In live shot of 2nd hit, camera man taken by surprise by plane—plane suddenly enters frame—cameraman apparently not able to see plane approaching 30) Initial 2nd hit videos, particularly live shot, only show indirect view of tower hit; dont see videos with plane going directly into tower until much later 31) Fox5 side-view shot of plane replayed on CNN, talking heads refer to plane going through the building, but view of plane is cut off by large banner at bottom of screen 32) Both the ABC/CNN/Fox live shot and the Fox5 shots of the 2nd hit have blackouts right after the explosion starts 33) Michael Hezarkhani not allowed to talk about his video by CNN 34) Michael Hezarkhanis amazing ability to pan at the speed of a plane coming over his head from behind 35) The inconsistent story of where Michael Hezarkhani filmed his video 36) The bad acting/over acting of the voices in the black plane video 37) Frames of the black plane video appearing as Robert Clark photos 38) The Manos video where the woman rants about suicide bombers as the 2nd hit occurs and where the videographer also has a video of him and friends sneaking into Area 51 39) The Park Foreman video initially appearing as photo frames on CNN 40) Suspicious history of CameraPlanet, where many amateur videos appeared 41) The CBS video from the north where the plane comes in at a blatantly wrong angle to hit the tower, disappears behind the tower, then the explosion 42) The odd similarity of the Naka Nathtaniel and Park Foreman videos—in particular the same panning motion in both 43) Clear discrepancy in the Anthony Cotsifas photo with the position of the 2nd plane with 2nd hit videos 44) The inconsistent story of Evan Fairbanks and his video 45) Evan Fairbanks alluding to his video being unreal 46) The cartoon-like quality of the plane image in several second hit videos 47) The airframe anomalies in the plane in most 2nd hit videos 48) The fact that high resolution videos of the second hit have not been released 49) The fact that no one has taken up Ace Bakers challenge for $100,000 for an original amateur 2nd hit video 50) David Handschuh (and others, e.g. Victor Cruzate) not seeing the plane despite being in position to see it Humint Events Online: 120 Reasons Why I Am a No-Planer excellent list of comments and facts proving that no planes hit the WTC and Pentagon. Genghis6199 - 911 Solved In 42 Seconds (funny mind control) - YouTube the choppers - raw - part 1 - YouTube 911 VERY RARE VIDEO !!! Look, Listen & Learn the TRUTH !!! - YouTube Second plane crash into South Tower - YouTube NO PLANE HIT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER 9/11 - YouTube Demolition Access to The WTC Buildings exposed - YouTube WTC - Second Plane Crash - YouTube Gary Welz 9 11 Fake Plane Eyewitness - YouTube 2nd Plane WTC - YouTube 9/11 Military Information Warfare & PSYOP - YouTube Mike Walter Accidentally Reveals the Truth - YouTube Pentagon 9/11 Eyewitness Mike Walter Exposed - YouTube New 911 Footage - THERE IS NO PLANE - From Another Helicopter - YouTube a3yj4.jpg (JPEG Image, 400x450 pixels) slide_190013_354247_huge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1080x785 pixels) Original No-Plane Witness On 9/11 - YouTube 'No second plane, it was a bomb. Who said it was a second plane?' 'That's what we're told, we saw it on television.' 'No, I saw everything.' Interviews undertaken by Rick Leventhal 5 minutes apart, around 10:20am on Fox News, September Eleventh 2001. Now in HD.

Shanksville (F93)
United Airlines Flight 93

back to top

911 FOX reports Flight 93 shot down by an F-16 from the US National Air Guard - YouTube HIJACKED UNITED FLIGHT 93 SHOT DOWN BY USAF Wayne Madsen: Cheney Masterminded 9-11 Terror | Sikh Archives On September 11, 2001, PDAS was used to convey the information from the Air Force Chief of Staff to the White House, CIA, and other select agencies that the Air Force had successfully intercepted and downed a target over Pennsylvania. It is believed that the “target” in question was United flight 93, although there is no confirmation that the aircraft was in fact the one downed by Air Force interceptors. 9-11 Coordinated By Cheney Says Wayne Madsen On September 11, 2001, PDAS was used to convey the information from the Air Force Chief of Staff to the White House, CIA, and other select agencies that the Air Force had successfully intercepted and downed a target over Pennsylvania. It is believed that the "target" in question was United flight 93, although there is no confirmation that the aircraft was in fact the one downed by Air Force interceptors. [redacted] news: "PDAS" - The Super-Classified 9/11 Command & Control Network CBS - President Bush ordered UA93 shot down BEFORE the crash - YouTube I think people are missing the point to this video, which aired less than two months after 9/11. The point of this video is to show that the 9/11 Commission deliberately misled the public by claiming the military was unaware of the hijacking of UA93 until 10:07, four minutes after it crashed. I've spoken personally to the mayor of Indian Lake who was at the crash scene that day and even he shakes his head at the idea that the military was unaware of UA93. The commission also says that the NEADS Commander that day refused to pass the order along to fighter pilots in fear of an accidental shootdown. The 9/11 Commission, published in 2004, mind you, states clearly that fighter pilots were never told about the shootdown order. Awake And United-9-11 Truth! - Dick Cheney Shanksville - YouTube Dick Cheney admits Flight 93 was shot down - YouTube Dick Cheney admits Flight 93 was shot down - YouTube Dick Cheney admits to having flight 93 shot out of the sky. The only hijacked plane that had a chance of returning at least some of it's passengers home and Dick destroys it. Why would he do that? The plane had been retaken by it's passengers....remember Todd Beamer's "Let's Roll"? Norman Minetta tells 9/11 Commission that Dick Cheney knew the exact flight path of Flight 93 (and did nothing) Norman Mineta (US Secretary of Transportation) testifies that Dick Cheney was operationally aware of flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon. The government has consistently stated that it did not know the whereabouts of the hijacked aircraft before they crashed. In this video Norman Mineta testifies before the 9/11 Commission that he was present and personally observed VP Dick Cheney in the Presidential Emergency Operating Center tracking the exact position of flight 77 for many miles on its approach to the Pentagon. Q U E S T I O N: How could the most heavily defended building in the world have been so easily attacked? Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was "shot down." - YouTube ?Rumsfeld 's Accidental Slip of the Tongue, Flight 93 shot down!?? - YouTube Rumsfeld admits flight 93 was shot down - Exclusive Anouncement - YouTube

Flight 93 Shot Down on History Channel - YouTube Russian NTV reports flight 93 shot down - missing piece of 9/11 evidence ! - YouTube Documented confirmation of a passenger plane shot down on 9/11. The important news starts at 01.40 from the beginning of the clip. Moscow time at this moment is 22.01, in New York - 2.01 PM EST. It could be verified from the beginning - it shows Moscow time 21.59. Russian NTV news program "Today" presents the account of 9/1 events. Its international editor Filipp Trofimov reports at 03.10 from the beginning of the clip (verbatim in English): "... anti-aircraft defense of the USA discovers the fourth airliner -- presumably heading towards the Pentagon. A pursuit plane wards off the threat. The aircraft falls down not very far from Camp David, the presidential residence..." For more information visit www.911thology.com or www.911thology.cn 911_Youtube_FOX_reports_flight_93_shot_down_by_US_National_Air_Guard.wmv (video/x-ms-wmv Object) Alex Jones : Award for man who shot down Flight 93 on 9/11 United Airlines Flight 93 shot down Alex Jones Radio Show with Col Donn de Grand Pre and John Lee from Pirate News at Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com and PirateNews.org/flight93.html. As seen on History Channel. John Lee's job in US Air Force was controlled demoliiton of US military bases using nuclear bombs, and nuking Western Europe, and his spouse was personally offered a job at the Pentagon by SecDef Dick Cheney, for leading a successful mutiny during Iraq War #1 at PirateNews.org/pentagonwhistleblower.html. ATC hijack "wargame" tapes from NORAD NEADS on 9.11.2001. Fair use for non-preofit news commentary per 17 US Code 107. Donations: PirateNewsProductions.com NORAD Confirms 9 11 Footage of Flight 93 crashing(Shot Down) near Camp David - YouTube Flight 93 Shot Down on History Channel - YouTube Flight 93 Eyewitness Sees A Second Plane, Says Flight 93 Was Shot Down - YouTube 9/11 Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain - YouTube 9/11 Flight 93 Eyewitness Susan McElwain Saw A Smaller Jet Moments Earlier In The Same Area - YouTube Eyewitness to Shanksville Crash - It Was Not a 757 - YouTube BANNED FROM CNN Flight 93 eyewitness admits not seeing dead bodies - YouTube BANNED FROM CNN Flight 93 eyewitness admits not seeing dead bodies - YouTube Flight 93 Crash Eye Witness - YouTube Flight 93 Did Not Crash In Pennsylvania! - YouTube FLIGHT 93 CRASH EXPOSED! RARE FOOTAGE NEVER AGAIN SEEN ON TV - YouTube Project Camelot : "What Really Happened to Flight 93?" (1) - YouTube http://www.projectcamelot.org/lang/en/elizabeth_nelson_flight_93_transcript_en.html Project Camelot : "What Really Happened to Flight 93?" (2) - YouTube Project Camelot : "What Really Happened to Flight 93?" (Final 3) - YouTube

Media, Witnesses, Calls, Families

back to top

9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europe Oral Histories From Sept. 11 Compiled by the New York Fire Department - The New York Times The surprising adventures of Stanley Praimanth No Plane Crash: The surprising adventures of Stanley Praimanth

'YOU'RE scared! I'M the one that went through hell': How fake 9/11 victim tormented genuine survivors | Mail Online She rose to fame in 2003 when her story emerged as one of only nineteen people to escape death above the point of impact in the South Tower in the 9/11 attacks. Tania Head's survival story was made all the more heartbreaking since she lost her fiance in the North Tower. America took Head into their hearts both as a victim and as the woman who publicly fought for the cause of the 9/11 survivors. But in 2007 she became infamous as the woman who made it all up. Knowing that her cover was about to be blown by an upcoming New York Times exposé, she revealed the shocking lies in 2007. Now, the extent of Tania's cruel deception is being revealed further in The Woman Who Wasn't There, a book by Robin Gaby Fisher and Angelo J. Guglielmo Jr, which is scheduled for release next month. As part of her web of lies, Head forced an actual survivor, Linda Gormley, to relive her trauma and mocked her when Ms Gormley found it difficult. The lies began in 2003 when Head emerged as a survivor of the attacks, spinning her story to a nation still deeply wounded by the attacks. Riding on the back of her lies, Head soon rose to become president of the World Trade Center Survivors’ Network. Politicians, media, fellow survivors, and the families of those who died in the attacks all drew inspiration from her fabricated tale of tragedy and triumph. Inevitably, she also became friends with fellow survivors, including Ms Gormley. The fraudster convinced Ms Gormley that they should be leaning on one another to get through their trauma, and implored Ms Gormley to help her with her therapy. Ms Gormley was reluctant to talk in depth about the terror, but couldn't say no to her forceful friend who, she believed, had suffered more than she had in the attacks. Ms Gormley had witnessed people die, but Head had been badly burnt, nearly lost an arm and lost the love of her life, Dave, in the North Tower. Exposed: The book reveals the cruelty Tania Head caused with her deceit Exposed: The book reveals the cruelty Tania Head caused with her deceit Head told Gormley that she had was undergoing an intense form of treatment to help deal with her post traumatic stress called 'flooding.' The treatment involved Head reciting the terrible incidents of the attacks – and recording them. Head told Ms Gormley that, as part of the therapy, she had to then listen back to the tape until her fear receded and to enlist the help of a friend if she needed support. So Head asked her 'fellow' survivor to listen to the graphic recital with her. Ms Gormley wanted to avoid reliving the nightmare and tried in vain to postpone it. ‘You’re scared! Ha! Why should you be scared? I’m the one who went through hell. All you have to do is listen to a tape with me,’ Head taunted. And trapped in Head's apartment Ms Gormley, who had herself seen people die in the attacks, was forced to listen to the tape which brought back the terror of her own ordeal. The genuine survivor was made to listen to Tania talk about looking at the lifeless body of her secretary who has been almost decapitated. ‘She has no head!’ she cries in the tape, ‘Oh my God! I can’t breathe! My skin is burning! They’re all dead, Everyone is dead!’ Ms Gormley is desperate to turn off the tape but doesn’t dare to stand up to Tania – whose forceful nature she was already aware of. Head’s tape shines light on the intricate details she forged that tricked the entire nation into believing she was a survivor. The tape starts with Head talking about and her future husband, Dave, having breakfast. She dined on two sunny side up eggs, while he ate three over easy. Then they both commuted to work at the Twin Towers - she in the South Tower, and he in the North. Head, whose real name is Alicia Esteve Head, was in fact thousands of miles away at business school in Barcelona. The Woman Who Wasn’t There reveals the intricacy of the web of lies which allowed Head to become the face of the survivors, the woman who gave Rudy Giulani and Michael Bloomberg a tour around Ground Zero and who fooled the nation with her story. When her lies were exposed Head disappeared from New York although various sightings of her in the city have been reported in recent years. aangirfan: TANIA HEAD - SPOOKY 9 11 FAKE; TOULOUSE MERAH FAKE Tania Head was the founder and boss of the World Trade Center Survivors' Network. Tania says that, on 9 11, she was on the 78th-floor in the south tower when a plane struck. She says she was lying on the floor when a man with a red bandanna put out the flames on her back. In reality, Tania Head was in Barcelona on 9 11. Tania Head's real name is Alicia Esteve Head. She is the daughter of a Spanish businessman who went to prison for embezzlement In 2007, as the New York Times was about to expose her, she confessed to her lies. Book Review: ‘The Woman Who Wasn’t There,' by Robin Gaby Fisher and Angelo J. Guglielmo Jr. - NY Daily News

IranContraScumDid911's Channel - 9/11 excellent witness videos - YouTube 9/11 excellent witness videos The 911 Solution the Big Clue Everybody Missed (fake witness) - YouTube Tania Head: The 911 Faker - YouTube Alicia Esteve Head is a Spanish woman who claimed to be a survivor of the World Trade Center September 11 attacks under the name Tania Head. She joined the support group World Trade Centre Survivors' Network. She later became a spokesperson and president of the group and was regularly mentioned in media reports of the attacks. In 2007 it was learned her story was fabricated. Head was not in the building at the time of the attacks and had traveled to the United States for the first time in 2003. Once discovered she allegedly disappeared but apparently resurfaced in 2010 at the White Plains, NY memorial, this time in the role of Ester DiNardo, a supposed victim's mother. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=494535107792&set=a.183809967792.13... Phony victim's sister Gladys De La Torre comparison with fake victim's mother Alison Crowther: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php? fbid=10150117278942793&set=a.1838099677... The 9/11 operation is a grand theatrical scam, ongoing. Multiple victim and family member identities are fraudulent and maintained by actors in supporting roles. Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens (@1:20) - YouTube liar @ 1:20 actor Mark Humphrey is "FOX Freelancer" "Mark Walsh" Reality Check - Mark Humphrey is NOT the Harley Guy - YouTube 9/11 victim's families claiming "9/11 was an inside job" - YouTube 911 Live News Broadcasts - The New York stations - YouTube swompyskippy 911 twin towers 9/11 ABC, 9 12, 23 59, Tim Cothren footage Ground Zero - YouTube excellent footage of the WTC lobby. Exactly how and why is it in complete shambles if the plane crashed 70 stories up. swompyskippy 911 twin towers 9/11 911 pt 2 Cameraman Kevin Sutavee - YouTube The "Jumpers" of 9/11 are all FAKES? - YouTube These jumper photos all appear to be fakes to me--all cut & pastes. ALL THAT IS NEEDED IS A SINGLE EXAMPLE OF FRAUD--YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVE EVERY SHOT. They were obviously pre-made, and were included into to the storyline of the 9/11 to increase the "shock and awe" effect to steer us to giving up our rights to the real terrorists of 9/11, not some visa photos of Saudi citizens that we were conveniently provided to blame less than 24-hours later. Osama Bin Ladin's name was provided to us only 45-minutes after the first tower exploaded. Even the one "jumper" moving video that has floated around was less than 2 seconds long (25+still frames) and really was only a charcoal smudge. I noticed that as soon as I posted my finding a year or so ago, immediately it was taken down, and they started trying to correct their photoshop job. I saw one that was snuck in 2 years after the event that was what appeared to be watercolor, that was better than the photoshop, but still a fake. The picture of people hanging out of the windows shows to be fake as well. These exposures got yanked off of forums within minutes of posting, (the forums are all perp owned) And another voice is heard....... http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=501 ======== Received: "has sent you a message: you're right. the 9/11 jumpers are all fakes. To:albatross234 read about it here... http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=501 has sent you a message: you're right. the 9/11 jumpers are all fakes. To:albatross234 read about it here... http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=501 The "Jumpers" of 9/11 are all FAKES? (Part 2) - YouTube What Barbara Olson Knew - YouTube

9/11 FBI: Barbara Olson Did Not Call Ted Olson From Flight 77 On Her Cell Phone - YouTube The Barbara Olson Mystery Deepens – Did Ted Olson “Re-marry” his Dead wife, Barbara Olson by another name? | Lets Roll 911 BARBARA OLSON - 9/11 FRAUD? Is Lady Booth Really Barbara Olson with Plastic Surgery? - Let's Roll Forums BREAKING: 9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europe : General Conspiracies Killtown: Is Barbara Olson still alive? Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls? - An Analysis of New Evidence... The Mysterious Mrs. Ted Olsons CHOPPED OUT - YouTube FOXED OUT part1 - YouTube FOXED OUT part2 - YouTube Fire Weakens Steel but not Woman Waving in WTC North Tower - YouTube edna cintron wtc woman waving out of wtc - YouTube CNN 9/11/01 - World Trade Center Part 2 - YouTube 9/11 Key Witness Murdered? (Barry Jennings) - YouTube 9/11 FOIA Release NIST Special-Important Folder (All Clips) - YouTube Barry Jennings, a key 9/11 eyewitness who was an emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority, passed away last August 2008 at age 53 from undisclosed circumstances. Jennings was an eyewitness to the devastation of the World Trade Center towers on September 11th 2001. On the morning of 9/11 Barry Jennings with Michael Hess, (one of Rudy Giuliani's highest ranking appointed officials, New York city's corporation counsel), entered WTC Building 7. It was just after the first attack on the North tower, but before the second plane hit the South Tower, when Barry Jennings escorted Michael Hess to the WTC 7. Jennings recalls a large number of police officers in the lobby of WTC 7 when they arrived. The two men went up to the 23rd floor, but could not get in, so they went back to the lobby and the police took them up in the freight elevator for a second try. When they arrived on level 23, at the Office of Emergency Management (FEMA),) they found it had been recently deserted, "coffee that was on the desk, smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half eaten sandwiches," he said. At that point he made some phone calls and an un-named individual told them to "leave, and leave right away." Jennings and Hess then proceeded to the stairs and made it to level 6, when there was an explosion and the stairwell collapsed from under their feet; Jennings was actually hanging and had to climb back up. They made it back up to level 8, where Jennings had a view of the Twin Towers; both buildings were still standing. This is an important detail, as many debunkers have used Jennings' statements out of context to claim the damage came to WTC 7 from the towers collapsing. When they made it to the lobby, Jennings found it destroyed and littered with dead bodies. He said it looked like, "King Kong had came through it and stepped on it, [it was] so destroyed, I didn't know where I was. So destroyed that they had to take me out through a hole in the wall that I believe the fire department made to get me out." Shortly after he made it out, he was seen on several TV news channels telling his story. Jennings was admittedly confused as to why Building 7 had to come down at all, and does not accept the official reason that the noises he heard were from a fuel oil tank. "I know what I heard, I heard explosions," Jennings stated. Jennings testimony was memorialized in Loose Change for the Final Cut version of the extremely popular documentary, but was edited out at the final stage due to Jennings misgivings about losing his job and endangering his family. The BBC later interviewed Jennings for a "9/11 debunking special" and Jennings seemed to retract the testimony given to Loose Change. Subsequently the creators of the film released the original interview to protect their own credibility. Jennings passed away shortly thereafter and, coincidentally, just a few days before the long

awaited NIST report on WTC 7 was released to the public. It is quite possible that Jennings would have exposed the cover story of NIST, and its explanation that the 47 story-building WTC 7 was the first and only skyscraper felled by fire. He never got that chance. On April 15, 2009, I was contacted by Loose Change director and narrator Dylan Avery who said that he had recently begun investigating the death of Barry Jennings and had found some new information relating to his death. It seems that there is a very good possibility that Jennings' death could have been due to foul play. Though the investigations are on going, initial findings are somewhat alarming. The conclusion is still forthcoming, but I was shocked by what I heard. Avery stated he had hired a private investigator to look into Jennings death which remains shrouded in mystery. His motive was simply to bring some closure to the life of Barry Jennings and honor the memory of this brave American. The investigator referred the case to law enforcement and gave Avery his money back with the request that he never contact him again. Avery also paid a visit to the Jennings' home. He found it vacant and for sale. Why would a highly paid PI refuse to continue his investigation? Why did he refer the matter to police? He is not talking. What is he afraid of? Was he warned to cease and desist? If so, by whom? These are some of the new questions revolving around the Jennings case. In every major cover up from the JFK assassination to Iran-Contra, we can see one common thread. The untimely death of eyewitnesses. Barry Jennings was not only an important and most credible eyewitness, but he openly refuted much of the government and media version of events. He was a liability. Key 9/11 witness "commits suicide" - YouTube Another 9/11 Witness Murdered!!! (just blew up no plane) - YouTube Kenny Johannemann just blew up (no plane) Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE) - YouTube Dentist who was Poisoned to Death Before Testifying Against 9/11 Highjackers (MUST SEE) - YouTube 9/11: DAN RATHER SAYS WTC COLLAPSES LOOK LIKE DEMOLITIONS - YouTube 9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You - YouTube FBI NY confirms TV/Video Fakery Problems require Investigation - YouTube CENSORED 60 Minutes Interview / 911 Fakery Was A Media Job - YouTube Dr. Reynolds exposes 9/11 TV fakery on FoxNews - YouTube 9/11 Truth vs Mainstream Media - YouTube CBS News prez warned in 2000 about fake plane crashes - YouTube TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit? - YouTube 911stealth Botched First CNN Airing of Fake Attack to WTC2 - Chopper 7 - YouTube 9/11 Fake: The Hijacking Lie - YouTube 9/11 FLIGHT 77 PHONE CALL LIES - YouTube 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 11: eyewitness SEAN BOGER - YouTube Heliport Tower Air Traffic Controller Sean Boger (Pentagon Attack Witness) - YouTube 911 ACTORS - YouTube DID 3000 PEOPLE REALLY DIE ON 9-11 ?? - YouTube The Vicsim Report Check Out The Links!! - YouTube 911 HARLEY GUY ACTOR MARK HUMPHREY ANSWERS YOUR QUESTIONS - YouTube Full 911 Harley Shirt Guy Scene - Actor Mark Humphrey Is "FOX Freelancer" "Mark Walsh" - YouTube Jason Bermas on VicSims - YouTube TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS Kevin McPadden, 9-11 First Responder - YouTube 911 Eyewitness - Evidence of thermonuclear explosions - YouTube

9/11 Survivor Questions Official Story on local Fox News - YouTube Fox News Denounces 9/11 Truth Movement Again - YouTube » 9/11 Responders To Be Screened For Terrorism Ties Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! George W. Bush - 9/11 Bullhorn Speech - YouTube September 11th Fox News footage - Part 1 (witnesses lie) - YouTube tv show dr. gross radio caller, small commuter plane hit WTC we just saw another plane hit the tower - tv anchor Bill Stokes caller claims (works at Thomson street at village), heard low flying plane sanitation worker said he saw a plane Another No Planes Video on 9/11 (anchors see explosions, no planes) - YouTube anchors see explosions, no planes 911 NBC - eye-witness saw 2 explosions in Twin Towers, but no plane - YouTube PROPAGANDA911 - YouTube The 911 Pyramid Mega-Ritual - YouTube 9/11 Survivor Eyewitnesses - YouTube Barrie Zwicker - 9/11 Media Cover-Up 1 - YouTube Barrie Zwicker - 9/11 Media Cover-Up 2 - YouTube 9/11 Media cover-up: Barrie Zwicker - YouTube The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers: Zwicker (#3 - YouTube Jonathan Kay "Among The Truthers" Antisemitism & Cranks - YouTube 9/11 Media cover-up: Barrie Zwicker - YouTube Toronto 911 Truth contact (Barrie Zwicker 416.651-5588 or email bwz@rogers.com) TGC: THE GREAT CONSPIRACY Was 9/11 a conspiracy? ‘Truthers' make their case - The Globe and Mail Barrie Zwicker | 911Blogger.com Toronto 911 Truth contact and website links - World Domination

Rescue Workers, NYFD photos
back to top

back to top

PeerGeoEpoche.jpg (JPEG Image, 2345x1865 pixels) 5622.jpg (JPEG Image, 800x1228 pixels) 02155vx.jpg_6.jpg (JPEG Image, 1352x964 pixels) 911smell.jpg (JPEG Image, 1024x768 pixels) bush -5efdd10f65049109.JPG (JPEG Image, 828x960 pixels) 110901-firefighters-vlg5p.jpg (JPEG Image, 859x1000 pixels) Image302.jpg (JPEG Image, 768x1024 pixels) wtcCutColumnLarge.jpg (JPEG Image, 1373x962 pixels) WTC_04.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600x1200 pixels) WTC+NYC+andrea+booher+FEMA+3992.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600x1049 pixels) Overview-WTC2.jpg (JPEG Image, 2000x1312 pixels) WTC+NYC+andrea+booher+FEMA+3960.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600x1050 pixels) Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of The World Trade Centre - GZero_Sample.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Mortality among survivors of the Sept 11, 2001, World Trade Center disaster: results from the World Trade Center Health Registry cohort : The Lancet Lancet podcast 9/11 Rescue Workders 01september.mp3 (audio/mpeg Object) Patricia Ondrovic - Killtown: 9/11 Rescuer Saw Explosions Inside WTC 6 Lobby Shirley Hoofard - Witnesses Saw People "Vaporized" on 9/11 | Before It's News Deputy Chief Nick Visconti | Firehouse.com FDNY Firefighter Who Worked at WTC Site Dies | Firehouse.com Some 9/11 Firefighters Get Help, Some Don't | Firehouse.com Sept. 11 Navigator: Health Resources - New York Times World Trade Center Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program: Index 9/11's Lingering Cloud - CBS News 9/11 Firefighter Interview- "Collapsed to Dust" - YouTube 911 firefighters tell what they saw - YouTube HIGHLIGHTS : Interview with John Schroeder 911 FIREMAN - YouTube A Sit Down With An 9/11 Fire Fighter 9/11 Fake Actor In A Clean Firefighter Costume Says He Was Digging All Day, Too Hot For Rescue - YouTube WPIX WB11 8:30 PM September 11, 2001. Look at his new goggles, shiny helmet, clean dust mask, clean skin on his face, and a clean dust free uniform after working all day in fine dust and dirty debris. This guy is a planted fake witness giving a too hot to rescue cover story.

9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 1 - YouTube 9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 2 - YouTube 9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 3 - YouTube 9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 4 - YouTube 9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 5 - YouTube 9/11 The Miracle Of Stairwell B Part 6 - YouTube

Evidence

back to top

9/11 WTC ""Ground Zero"" Energy Surplus, Analysis and Discussion 9-11 Research: Twin Towers' Dust Clouds 9-11 Research: Dust From the South Tower 9-11 Research: North Tower Blueprints A-A-142_2.png (PNG Image, 1224x909 pixels) A-A-142_1.png (PNG Image, 2448x1819 pixels) - Scaled (42%) GJS-WTC26.jpg (JPEG Image, 1200x1600 pixels) A Conversation With Joseph Keith - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum Ground Zero's fires still burning - 03 December 2001 - New Scientist 9/11 theories news video and photo analysis Boeing 767 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A0014b_Pentagon_Decontamination_A.jpg (JPEG Image, 1226x1824 pixels) GZero_Sample.pdf (application/pdf Object)

The Mass Media and The 9-11 Cover-Up Anger builds over EPA’s 9/11 report - Health - Your Environment - msnbc.com illnesses_from_911.pdf (application/pdf Object) FealGood Foundation - Helping the Heroes of the 9/11 First Responders SeptemberClues.info | The Central Role of the News Media on 9/11 September 11 Inside Job planned at Harvard? - YouTube Philip Zelikow Kevin Barrett On Fox News Hannity And Colmes - YouTube Jeff Farrer - GOOD - Natuurkundige - Nederlandse ondertitels - AE911Truth.org - YouTube AE911Truth EXCLUSIEF INTERVIEW Natuurkundige Jeff Farrer (very interesting) 9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished - YouTube We have actively studied the questionable nature of the official version of what happened to our nation on September 11, 2001.Throughout the 1st year after 911 we ignored and did not believe those who asked us to question the official story.Like millions of Americans we believed America had been attacked by terrorists from abroad. Sadly, we are now convinced that rogue elements within our government committed a vicious criminal act against its own citizens for the larger purpose of swaying us to support both domestic and foreign policies mapped out in the late 1990's. 911 was Hitler's Reichstag fire of 1933 and Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor masterfully coordinated to achieve the desired ends of an imperialistic role for America in the world, patriotic support at home and the erosion of our constitutional rights. In a nutshell,the war on terrorism is a cruel hoax by a misguided, out-of-democratic control small group of individuals sabotaging the best of our values the World over! MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1 - YouTube MIT Engineer Jeff King's logical look at the official story of the WTC collapse. Only $600K was spent on 9/11 investigation (vs. $40M to investigate Clinton) FEMA admits that most of the kerosene burned off Black smoke indicates oxygen depleted fire Core of building did not have much that would actually burn, no inflamable material specifically designed not to act as a chminey, hermedically sealed system Nova documentary is a fraud. Weidlinger and Associates debunked the "pancake" theory. NSIST rejects pancake theory MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 2 - YouTube MIT Engineer Jeff King's logical look at the official story of the WTC collapse Massive dust clouds, this type of flow occurs in volcanic erruption, or trabiditory currents. High-speed slurry, large amounts of dense materials creates Pyroclastic Flow. World Trade Center a 3D Visualization - WTC - YouTube 1shabuti1's Channel - YouTube EXPLOSIONS BEFORE THE PLANES HIT ON 9-11 !!!!!! - YouTube WHAT'S THAT HE JUST SAID ??? - YouTube 9 11 Prior Knowledge Ptech, Indira Singh, Yasin Al Qadi 12 6 2002 CBS - YouTube Press TV's Waqar Rizvi talks to Mark Dankof on Truth abut 9/11 - YouTube Truth TV 9/11 is a hoax - YouTube

RLiebenstein1's Channel - YouTube JSTOR: Evolution, Vol. 53, No. 6 (Dec., 1999), pp. 1936-1950 Window cleaners on building in front to WTC, first tower... - YouTube U.S. Cameraman has Proof 9/11 was a Lie - YouTube An American FEMA cameraman who says September 11 was a lie is facing extradition from Argentina to the United States on alleged murder charges. Kurt Sonnenfeld, a man who was provided provisory refugee status seven years ago, is now wanted by the US government on murder charges. He is the only cameraman that filmed crucial images of Ground Zero in New York after the Twin Towers collapsed. Sonnenfeld, who lives in Buenos Aires with his Argentine family, says the footage proves that 9/11 was a lie. He still has the 22-hour footage that US authorities want. "I have promised to give my footage to the big investigators that are credible and widely known - investigators who will be able to detect anomalies that I or other people without scientific education might miss. With that in mind, I hope that there are many things they can discover that disprove the current official story of what happened," Sonnenfeld told a Press TV correspondent. He says he fears for his life if he is sent back to the United States to face trial. The Denver police have claimed they have evidence that show he killed his first wife in the US. Social activists who are campaigning for Sonnenfeld to be given refugee status in Argentina say the Denver police are lying. The Sonnenfelds say they have been under police surveillance and that their phone has been tapped. Sonnenfeld claims that his footage proves top US government officials were aware of the 2001 terrorist attacks before they occurred says he is a victim of a US plot to silence him. Amature video from 9/11 "WTC attack" Part1 - YouTube Evidence for Explosives in the Twin Towers

Commission Report, Truthers

back to top

9-11 Research: 9-11 Anomalies 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon - washingtonpost.com The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie "AMonaghan" Shared Files / NIST WTC FOIA Drawings 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey claims 911 was a 30 year conspiracy - YouTube 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it's job - Part 1 of 3 - YouTube 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it's job - Part 2 of 3 - YouTube 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it's job - Part 3 of 3 - YouTube UFOTV: 9/11 The Myth and The Reality - David Ray Griffin - Full Length Feature - YouTube A DEVASTATING EXPOS'E OF THE MYTHS AND LIES IN THE OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY ABOUT 9/11. Griffin scrutinizes the timeline and physical evidence of September 11 for unresolved inconsistencies. - PUBLISHERS WEEKLY. Also ON DVD - Full Version with Bonus Features 220 mins. On 2-DVDs. LOADED with Bonus Features, Cat. #U667. Go to http://www.UFOTV.com. This shocking film brings together an account of the 9/11 tragedy that is far more logical than the one we've been asked to believe. Gathering stories from the mainstream press, reports from other countries, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of US government officials, David Ray Griffin presents a case that leaves very little doubt that the attacks of 9/11 need to be further investigated. Disturbing facts emerge that put into serious question the official story and reveal an enormous deception. Packed with bonus features, expert analysis, in-depth commentary and unforgettable conclusions about this tragic event in American history. AE911Truther & New Jersey (Architects & Engineers) - YouTube Richard Gage. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth! - YouTube

9/11 Truth - David Ray Griffin on Noam Chomsky - YouTube 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Trailer; AE911Truth.org, 9/11/11 Anniversary DVD - YouTube This is the trailer for the expert-packed feature-length documentary by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The documentary premieres around the world the week prior to the September 11, 2011 Anniversary. Help us take advantage of the lead-up to the 10th anniversary to publicize the evidence about the destruction of the 3 WTC highrises on 9/11. See the AE911Truth Action Alert, http://ae911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html, and share the trailer "Experts Speak Out" http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org with family, friends, and associates. Don't forget your Facebook, Twitter, and other contacts. Order the DVD today at http://www.ae911truth.net/store while stock lasts in order to guarantee shipment by September 11, 2011. Feature-length 9/11 Documentary: http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org http://www.AE911Truth.org Join 23-year architect Richard Gage, AIA, in this feature length documentary with cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 top experts in their fields -- high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more. Each is highly qualified in his/her respective fields. Several have Ph.D's -- including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis. She, along with the other experts, exposes the fraud of NIST and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied and acknowledges the "overwhelming" evidence of high temperature incendiaries in all dust samples of the WTC. 9/11 family members and psychologists round out the professional showing and tie it all together in this milestone production. Follow around the web: http://ae911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org http://www.ae911truth.org http://www.facebook.com/ae911truth http://www.twitter.com/ae911truth http://www.youtube.com/ae911truth http://www.flickr.com/ae911truth https://www.ae911truth.net/store/ http://www.ae911truth.org/911investigator http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=143 http://www.ae911truth.org/evidence.html#Videos_by_AE911Truth AE911Truth.org 9/11 Truth 9/11 events 2011 9 11 anniversary events 2011 9/11 anniversary 2011 September 11th 2011 Anniversary September 11th 2011 Events 9/11 memorial 2011 9 11 memorial service 2011 9 11 documentary 2011 9/11 truth 2011 9/11 ceremony 2011 9/11 10th anniversary 9/11 10th anniversary events new york 9/11 schedule 2011 9/11 concerts 2011 9/11 news 2011 9/11 holidays 2011 9/11 activities 2011 9/11 festivals 2011 9 11 conference 2011 9 11 calendar 2011 9 11 dates 2011 9 11 things to do 2011 9/11 events 2011 September 11th 2011 Anniversary September 11th 2011 Events AE911Truth.org 9/11 EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE-Robert McCoy-Architect 2 Parts | 911Blogger.com Robert McCoy - High-rise Architect - 9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY - AE911Truth.org - YouTube Mr. McCoy expresses his doubt abut the official story and from NIST as to how these 3 skyscrapers were destroyed and calls for a new investigation examining he hypothesis of controlled demolition. This is raw footage from one of the experts appearing in our upcoming, hard-hitting documentary of evidence for the destruction of the 3 World trade Center skyscrapers. "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"Pre-Order the DVD "9/11 Experts Speak Out" September 1st 2011: http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=145 Preview the New AE911Truth.org 9/11 Documentary: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts": http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=143 Follow us around the web: http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org http://www.ae911truth.org http://www.facebook.com/ae911truth http://www.twitter.com/ae911truth http://www.youtube.com/ae911truth http://www.flickr.com/ae911truth https://www.ae911truth.net/store/ http://www.ae911truth.org/911investigator 9/11 pictures 9 11 pictures of the devil 911 pictures of bodies 9/11 pictures in the smoke 9 11 pictures of bodies 9 11 pictures of victims creepy 9/11 strange 9/11 9 11 photos 911 information 911 movies The NIST WTC 7 Report is False - YouTube This presentation describes some of the ways in which the 2008 WTC 7 report from the National Institute of Standard and Technology is false an unscientific.

9/11 WTC1 Demolition Zoom Enhanced Super Slow Mo -NIST FOIA - YouTube World Trade Center North Tower collapse analysis.(WTC1) New york 11th September 2001. NIST FOIA AE911Truth Dr. Bob Bowman Lt. Col.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=basYRd4lrfA AE911Truth Lynn Margulis, PhD, Scientist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y56Z1zkmAPQ AE911Truth Robert Podolski, Physicist, Engineer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP0ykcvOuno AE911Truth Casey Pfeiffer, S.E. Structural Engineer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWv_wVKA_7M AE911Truth Jerry Lobdall, C.E. Chemical Engineer Physicist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0iVvwxjtrA AE911Truth Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E. Civil and Structural Engineer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EuFqsyETKQ AE911Truth Michael Donly, P.E., Structural Engineer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOL71aZugL4 AE911Truth - Richard Humenn P.E.E. WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMKReas0WNc Are the 9/11 conspirators right? - YouTube US Government covers up who really did 9/11 - YouTube Uploaded by renagade12 on Mar 20, 2010 Thankyou to RussiaToday for reporting this very important development into who really was behind 9/11 which I reported on here- US GOVERNMENT BLOCKED 9/11 COMMISSIONhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl8EsR9OGg4 and 9/11 Commission BLOCKED by Government FULL FOIA DOCUMENT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqIPcctnrjA This is the smoking gun of letters- Your staff has advised us that the Commission seeks to participate in the questioning of certain enemy combatants detained in the war against terrorists of global reach. Such action by the Commission would substantially interfere with the ability of the United States to perform its law enforcement, defense and intelligence functions in the protection of the American people. Your legislative commission has had extraordinary- indeed, unprecedented in the annals of American history - access to many of the nations most sensitive secrets in the conduct of its work including detainee information. In response to the Commission's expansive requests for access to secrets, the executive branch has provided such access in full cooperation. There is however a line that the Commission should not cross- the line separating the Commission's proper inquiry into the September 11, 2001 attacks from interference with the Government's ability to safeguard the national security including protection of Americans from future terrorist attacks. The Commissions staff's proposed participation in questioning of detainees would cross that line. As the officers of the United States responsible for the law enforcement, defense and intelligence functions of the Government, we urge your Commission not to further pursue the proposed request to participate in the questioning of detainees. Donald H Rumsfeld- Secretary of Defense John Ashcroft- Attorney General George J Tenet- Director of Central Intelligence You can see the documents and letters herehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/28553929/US-government-blocked-9-11-Commission and on the ACLU website herehttp://www.aclu.org/files/assets/CIA.pdf Al-Qaeda CIA hi-jackers twin towers investigation Russ Baker Family of Secreta Bush administration George Bush Investigation commission intelligence 9/11 commission RussiaToday's channel is here- http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday 9/11 panel was warned not to probe too deeply by the US government. Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld warned 9/11 Commission about line it should not cross

911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 1 of 8. - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 2 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 3 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 4 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 5 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 6 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 7 of 8 - YouTube 911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 8 of 8 - YouTube Kurt Sonnenfeld - 9/11 Encyclopedia

9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public [Voltaire Network] 9/11 :WTC - Kurt Sonnenfeld video footage 9/11.: newly released 2010. - YouTube 9/11 Kurt Sonnenfeld FEMA Slideshow : Steel Dimensions, Corrosion, Deformations, and Cuts - YouTube 9/11.FEMA Photographer Kurt Sonnenfeld WTC Photos 1 of 3. - YouTube 9/11.FEMA Photographer Kurt Sonnenfeld WTC Photos 2 of 3. - YouTube 9/11 .FEMA Photographer Kurt Sonnenfeld WTC Photos 3 of 3. - YouTube Kurt Sonnenfeld interview: 9-11 ten years later - YouTube

Forums, Blogs, Youtube comments

back to top

Dimitri Khalezov's disinfo push "no planes" absurdity and cultish following http://tinyurl.com/6mr9vde Print Page - Dimitri Khalezov's disinfo push "no planes" absurdity and cultish following Dimitri Khalezov Dimitri Khalezov WTC Nuclear Demolition | Theory 2012 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE good discusion The Vatic Project: Dimitri Khalezov's 9-11 Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web! [video] Dimitri Khalezov - interview about 911 • Political Videos Forum • Smeggy's Forums • First Responder - "We Were Nuked on 9-11" -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net 911-dimitri-khalezov-discussion-banned-from-alex-jones-prisonplanet-forum-final-cut.pdf (application/pdf Object) Russian nuclear expert solves 9/11 mysteries? : Conspiracies / NWO / 9/11 Truth Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions – Re-edited – jobgoblin.com 911 Explained - Dimitri Khalezov (Full Version) A Challenge: Planers vs No Planers - Page 36 - (planes banking) New thread - Dimitri Khalezov - Page 14 - David Icke's Official Forums Wikipedia Censoring 9/11 Truth | Disinformation David Icke – (911 was an inside job) | Open News Press Physics911, by Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven, 9/11/2001 9/11 Odds Taylor Vixen: POtHS 3 - Conspiracy Facts - Part 76 - The Latest 911 Facts - 02 The 3rd Stage - List of various 911 documents HOW TO GUIDES | The West in the World THE WTC UFO, Missiles, And Unknown “Other” Activity At This Time | The Powers That Beat Truth shall set US free! | darethefuture.net Opportunities Have Consequences » Fool some people all the time, but … WTC Metal to be Memorialized in Colorado : Bilco's Domain Grepler - Did Mossad Pull The WTC 911 CNN LIVE BANNER CHANGE – Digital Manipulation.mp4 TERROR ON THE TUBE - The London 7/7 Bombings: A Murder Investigation UN Human Rights Official Under Fire For Describing 9/11 As A Cover Up : Dr. Leonard Coldwell

U.N. Chief Urged to Fire Official for Promoting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory - UN Watch Interrogating the Arizona Killings from a Safe Distance « In Today's World: Benedict Arnold Would Get a 'Medal of Freedom' - Salem-News.Com Morgan Reynolds - 9/11 Search for Truth - YouTube Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D. speaking at the forum 9/11 Search for Truth held in Seattle October 28, 2006. 9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! - YouTube Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! 911 inside job proof FDNY Study Confirms Rise in Cancer After 9/11 | Firehouse.com 9/11 Rescue Workers now with cancer - Please Read - Firehouse Forums - Firefighting Discussion » Alex Marks The 10th Anniversary of 9/11: Sunday Edition Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! » Does 9/11 Truth Have A Chance? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! WTC: NUCLEAR DEMOLITION? - Page 2 - Let's Roll Forums Thread AMAZING 911 Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview -- PLEASE watch! | PrisonPlanet Forum | BoardReader Blogger: TIA - Post a Comment 9/11thology - Forum Dimitri Khalezov's video - where to download it now? How to promote it? The site is now offline as of 2012-03-06.

9/11 Material & Research Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum -> Research AMAZING 911 Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview -- PLEASE watch! AMAZING 911 Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview -- PLEASE watch! SUMMARY The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Seven ** INVITATION ** Join our growing 911 thread ... *** WHY was 911 named "Ground Zero" ??? PLEASE reconsider this discussion ... The Great Deception -> * 3rd Theory Of What Happened On 911 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE ***** Why are Wikipedia & AE911Truth censoring Information about Dr. Judy Wood? 9/11 and the two-stage "Khalezov Effect" -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net The Destruction – Part 1/2 Steven Jones Ph.D |

Good guys

back to top

Welcome to my website I am a Professional English ? Portuguese Translator & Interpreter. I first came to the US at the age of 5, when my father came to the US to get his PHD in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michigan. I arrived in Ann Arbor, MI, USA, coming from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, I then faced the challenge of learning English with my school friends. Since then

communication has become my first goal in life. It is my pleasure to help the understanding between people from different cultures. Sincerely yours, Mauricio Maia de Mello Massa Contact information: USA: (305)-951-8477 Brazil: USIP # (305)-433-2133, or Tel #: 011-55-21-3627-0777, or Cel #: 011-55-21-8778-0777. USA Office 6927 Villa De Costa Dr Apt - 102 Orlando, FL, 32821 Cel: (305) 951-8477 E-mail: mauriciomassa@me.com website: http://web.mac.com/mauriciomassa DoB: May 25, 1966 911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake « Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier 1shabuti1's Channel - YouTube annebeck58 - YouTube checkThrice - YouTube cheerdiver's Channel - YouTube CollinAlexander - YouTube jiwbink - YouTube Massaricossudo's Channel - YouTube poznanski666 - YouTube pt1gard - YouTube TitusSviatoslav's Channel - YouTube

Disinfo, Debunkers

back to top

Disinfo - YouTube (Agents, Zionists, Teams)

back to top

Very easy to identify ... they smell so bad in real life, that their putrid stench follows them everywhere, even online. These are real disinfo agents that post tens of thousands of bullshit comments. Google search any name as follows to verify their reply rates: site:youtube.com/all_comments "disinfo_name in reply to" (replace disinfo_name with the youtube account name) if google results show over 1,000 hits, then this account is very likely a real disinfo account. 1MtnBoy 12weasel100 2000tc88 390bullitt1968 911sausageman AlQaedaIsReal ApfelDerZwiet bakerpd4 BobDawg173 BPLucifer cjnewson88 cadu1995 Countrygent100 ctcole77 ctcole77 - /watch?v=R4lt2Rl3YGM ctcole77 - /watch?v=wIgzE_317to culturebully3 cveitch DamoSuzuki100

denierbud11 dreadnaught2 DrunkyMcSwervencrash DTD110865 ed11561 EvilStar109 fascistcat FievelJ69 Fippletest floydfreak63 fourfame4 freethinkerer GHOSTTOYS gontsaru heafers84 IATM29 lcspies imbetterthanyouis IranContraScumDid911 // ridicules no planes itzahazylife jonescool1fly joyfulvulture KillahB89 lanerant LOLCATS3111 marksman500 merlin5by5 mikelh mikerowphone MrSkunkwork100 nemac23 nerdyharry noliesundead onebadgs400 peyoteasesino666 pitt15220 planesareawsome pookster78 posada37 ProfessorTiNfOiL Rob260259 Rob26O259 roquefortfiles SkuIICrusherGhost

soulinite Spindry96 SpookMSgt stig5057 Stillwater900 Stu3100 TheBushwooky TheSmartestTaco TruthersRAlwaysWrong TuesdayMorningInSept TwinSmoke Thetan1974 wimahlers xxxxdarksidexxxx

Disinfo - YouTube (Misguided)

back to top

Seem genuine but are misguided. Some of these accounts may be real disinfo, but most are likely just annoying and uninformed. 008klm 911snausageman aifammafiaaifam aifammafiaaifam anastasia2657 assclownsolegendary bluehaze205 CaptMandrake360 channel/UCl6kLRMVS1CRUQYCvOi2qiA // Chris Opzoomer ChrisCrazy100 CTV911 dceasar1 DeadlyDiddly DHLaShomb Doctor1297 dominojam325 elsanjol emilram Finnquirer g779g7t6 GasLand grettoz guycharlotte09 haskinjr imcool2448

inoexist Instigator411 irpq11 ITSfunnyTimes jerkyturkey007 jewels100sm kaneumann Kenyon712 kilox10001 lonkow LoyolaIgnatius lynlarouche manybulb8 mattie2kunited MegascatmanIV misone01 mvphotoartgraphy NafffRespect noelligh PAsIEUMx1Vpjrvkm phoenix25140 PQsVids quegen qwerty98775 Red1Six Redrover8431 RexDuglar saultrain sixdgrs solarisdeluna sqdldrfanbarnone streetbeats13 tacoandpie Tautoulogic terrapin52 TheGreenPlague thejonnie1988 TheTruthAbout911 TheVino3 Truthmindedness USAF1123 WakeUpToTheNWO2 Westsydneyshemale WTC911demolition

Disinfo - People, Sites

back to top

YouTube 9/11 Disinfo Scumbag List The scumbags listed here spread lies about 9/11, discourage people from watching certain videos and researching various 9/11 theories. Don't be fooled by these pieces of shit. Don't let anyone discourage you from researching whatever you want. Email me names that belong on this list. I support the evidence presented by Dimitri Khalezov and Ace Baker, but feel free to research what you wish. My full 9/11 research: ---------------------------- http://www.scribd.com/doc/82151575/9-11-Research-Bookmarks PEOPLE - 9/11 Disinfo Scumbags ---------------------------------------------- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_(radio_host) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Bermas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Rosenbaum_(producer) http://911blogger.com/blogs/tumetuestumefaisdubien http://www.cveitch.org/ ALEX JONES - 9/11 Disinfo Scumbags on PrisonPlanet forum: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 Dig EvadingGrid iks83 Route YOUTUBE - 9/11 Zionist Disinfo Agents, Teams ---------------------------------------------------------------- Very easy to identify ... they smell so bad in real life, that their putrid stench follows them everywhere, even online. These are real disinfo agents that post tens of thousands of bullshit comments. 1MtnBoy 12weasel100 2000tc88 390bullitt1968 911sausageman AlQaedaIsReal ApfelDerZwiet bakerpd4 BobDawg173 BPLucifer cjnewson88 cadu1995 Countrygent100 ctcole77 ctcole77 - /watch?v=R4lt2Rl3YGM ctcole77 - /watch?v=wIgzE_317to culturebully3 cveitch DamoSuzuki100 denierbud11 dreadnaught2 DrunkyMcSwervencrash DTD110865 ed11561 EvilStar109 fascistcat FievelJ69 Fippletest floydfreak63 fourfame4 freethinkerer GHOSTTOYS gontsaru heafers84 IATM29 lcspies imbetterthanyouis IranContraScumDid911 itzahazylife jonescool1fly joyfulvulture KillahB89 lanerant LOLCATS3111 marksman500 merlin5by5 mikelh mikerowphone MrSkunkwork100 nemac23 nerdyharry noliesundead onebadgs400 peyoteasesino666 pitt15220 planesareawsome pookster78 posada37 ProfessorTiNfOiL Rob260259 Rob26O259 roquefortfiles SkuIICrusherGhost soulinite Spindry96 SpookMSgt stig5057 Stillwater900 Stu3100 TheBushwooky TheSmartestTaco TruthersRAlwaysWrong TuesdayMorningInSept TwinSmoke Thetan1974 wimahlers xxxxdarksidexxxx YOUTUBE - 9/11 Disinfo, Misguided ------------------------------------------------------------------ Seem genuine but are misguided. Some of these accounts may be real disinfo, but most are likely just annoying and uninformed. 008klm 911snausageman aifammafiaaifam airkooled05 anastasia2657 assclownsolegendary bluehaze205 CaptMandrake360 channel/UCl6kLRMVS1CRUQYCvOi2qiA ChrisCrazy100 CTV911 dceasar1 DeadlyDiddly DHLaShomb Doctor1297 dominojam325 elsanjol emilram Finnquirer g779g7t6 GasLand grettoz guycharlotte09 haskinjr imcool2448 inoexist Instigator411 irpq11 ITSfunnyTimes jerkyturkey007 jewels100sm kaneumann Kenyon712 kilox10001 lonkow LoyolaIgnatius lynlarouche manybulb8 mattie2kunited MegascatmanIV misone01 mvphotoartgraphy NafffRespect noelligh PAsIEUMx1Vpjrvkm phoenix25140 PQsVids quegen qwerty98775 Red1Six Redrover8431 RexDuglar saultrain sixdgrs solarisdeluna sqdldrfanbarnone streetbeats13 tacoandpie Tautoulogic terrapin52 TheGreenPlague thejonnie1988 TheTruthAbout911 TheVino3 Truthmindedness USAF1123 WakeUpToTheNWO2 Westsydneyshemale WTC911demolition Steve Rosenbaum: 9/11: Ready for Its Primetime Close-Up? Alex Jones (radio host) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jason Bermas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Steven Rosenbaum (producer) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia David Icke's Official Forums - View Profile: andrewjohnson Debunking-911-Debunking.PDF (application/pdf Object) The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax | Truth Watching 9/11 & Free Energy: Why Did a U.S. Army Major & Soviet Nuclear Intelligence Officer Contact Me Regarding 9/11?

GCongress> Duff and Barrett promote Khalezov and must be considered untrustworthy RE: 911 Pentagon & WTC destruction, Re: Fwd: JB Campbell: Anatomy of a Frame gamolon - Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket tumetuestumefaisdubien's blog | 911Blogger.com disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov 150kt Nukes Demolished Wtc ? - debunking of Dimitri Khalezov's ridiculous claims | 911Blogger.com disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov http://911blog.yweb.sk/ Abel Danger: 911 WTC Nuclear Demolition - Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26 disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov CheckTheEvidence.com - Re-exploding the WTC Nuclear Demolition Myth – The Mysterious Dimitri Khalezov disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov CheckTheEvidence.com - WTC Nuke theory - Self Contradiction - WTC is Melted and Turned to Dust at the same time. disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov Tests for a dirty bomb The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax disinfo vs. Dimitri Khalezov Failed attempted debunking. The Earth Is An Oblate Spheroid - Installment VII: "Ignorance Is Bliss" disinfo vs StillDiggin

UFO - Nick Pope Ultimate 9/11 Expert? 1of2 - Anthony J Hilder - YouTube UFO - Nick Pope Ultimate 9/11 Expert? 2of2 - Anthony J Hilder - YouTube

Debunkers

back to top

truthaction.org :: View topic - Kevin Barrett promoting disinfo A Response to Kevin Barrett’s 9/11 Truth News Attacks | Disinformation The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax | Wake Up From Your Slumber Ron Wieck And Alex Jones - YouTube New 9/11 Study Has Direct Links To Government, Pentagon Black Ops New Study Props Up Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7 WTC, 9/11/01 Scientifically based animation of 9/11 attacks a challenge for CS servers 9/11 AND CHERTOFF: COUSIN WROTE 9/11 PROPAGANDA FOR PM DEBUNKING 911 C0NSPIRACY THEORISTS - Let's Roll Forums author of the www.debunking911.com website | Gathering Spot

USATODAY.com - Chertoff played key role on 9/11 History Channel Back-Pedals On 9/11 Hit Piece Joneses, 911 'Truth' Still Silent On Proven 'Anomalies'? Mark Steyn reviews Debunking 9/11 Myths - Popular Mechanics 911 Lying Traitors -Popular Mechanics is owned by Hearst Corporation Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory: Amazon.co.uk: David Ray Griffin: Books The Hidden Hand Of The CIA, 911 And Popular Mechanics Refuting the lie, a response to Popular Mechanics: debunking 9/11 myths Popular Mechanics Attacks the "9/11 LIES" Straw Man Popular Mechanics Does 9/11 Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11 Popular Mechanics used a 9/11 truth website to debunk strawmen claims POP MECHANICS AND ITS 9/11 COVER-UP DEBACLE - Chris Bollyn - Let's Roll Forums Popular Mechanics Debunked Debunking Popular Mechanics?: They lied. FAA Concedes No Such data exists., page 1 Debunking Popular Mechanics?: They lied. FAA Concedes No Such data exists., page 2 Who Owns What | Columbia Journalism Review 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - Pentagon - Popular Mechanics Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Timeline and military response... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking Popular Mechanics... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking US State Department ... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking snopes.com... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking Urban Legends... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking Truth or Fiction... Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? - Debunking Paul Boutin... BlisterHiker's Channel - YouTube 9/11 - United 175 CGI Plane Theory Debunked - YouTube 9/11 Richard Gage (AIA) Schools Mark Roberts (TourGuide) - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.1 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.2 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.3 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.4 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.5 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.6 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.7 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.8 of 9 - YouTube Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical - Pt.9 of 9 - YouTube 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 1 - YouTube 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 2 - YouTube

9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 3 - YouTube 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 4 - YouTube 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 5 - YouTube "No Bodies Found At Pentagon Claim": A Closer Look - YouTube aravenidiot's Channel - YouTube

Judy Wood & DEW

back to top

Jones - Deagle transcript 9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007- Part 1/2 - YouTube 9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007- Part 2/2 - YouTube Dr. Judy Wood Debunked - YouTube Links debunking Judy Wood: http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/architects-and-engineers-for-911-tru... http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/505-ae911truth-faq-6-wh... http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/b/scientific-critique-of-judy-wood... http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/Szamboti_The_Damage_to_WTC_Bldg._s... http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Directed-Ener... http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/Fe-DustStudies44.pdf http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/JenkinsFe-DustSupplemental.pdf Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez Questions Richard Gage at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011 (Part 1 of 2) YouTube Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez Questions Richard Gage at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011 (Part 2 of 2) YouTube pookzta's Channel - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 1 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 2 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 3 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 4 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 5 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 6 of 7) - YouTube 9/11, The Hutchison Effect, & Directed Energy Weapons (Day One - Part 7 of 7) - YouTube

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->