This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/82167345/DesignofBondedAnchorsETATechnicalReport
11/15/2012
text
original
E TA
E TA
EUROPEAN ORGANI SATI ON FOR TECHNI CAL APPROVALS
TECHNICAL REPORT
Design of
Bonded Anchors
TR 029
Edition June 2007
Amended September 2010
74533.07
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Design method for bonded anchors
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Type of anchors, anchor groups and number of anchors ...................................................................... 2
1.2 Concrete member................................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Type and direction of load ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.4 Safety class ............................................................................................................................................ 3
2 Terminology and Symbols ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Indices .................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Actions and resistances ......................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Concrete and steel ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.4 Characteristic values of anchors (see Figure 2.1) .................................................................................. 5
3 Design and safety concept ............................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Ultimate limit state .................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2.1 Design resistance............................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Partial safety factors for resistances .................................................................................................. 6
3.2.2.1 Concrete cone failure, splitting failure, combined pullout and concrete cone failure, pry .... out
failure and edge failure ................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2.2.2 Steel failure................................................................................................................................ 7
3.3 Serviceability limit state .......................................................................................................................... 7
4 Static analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 7
4.1 Noncracked and cracked concrete ....................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Loads acting on anchors ........................................................................................................................ 8
4.2.1 Tension loads ..................................................................................................................................... 8
4.2.2 Shear loads ...................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2.2.1 Distribution of shear loads ....................................................................................................... 10
4.2.2.2 Determination of shear loads .................................................................................................. 11
4.2.2.3 Shear loads without lever arm ................................................................................................. 13
4.2.2.4 Shear loads with lever arm ...................................................................................................... 14
5 Ultimate limit state .......................................................................................................................................... 15
5.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 15
5.2 Design method ..................................................................................................................................... 15
5.2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................ 15
5.2.2 Resistance to tension loads ............................................................................................................. 15
5.2.2.1 Required proofs ....................................................................................................................... 15
5.2.2.2 Steel failure.............................................................................................................................. 15
5.2.2.3 Combined pull out and concrete cone failure ......................................................................... 15
5.2.2.4 Concrete cone failure .............................................................................................................. 19
5.2.2.5 Splitting failure due to anchor installation ................................................................................ 22
5.2.2.6 Splitting failure due to loading ................................................................................................. 22
5.2.3 Resistance to shear loads ................................................................................................................ 23
5.2.3.1 Required proofs ....................................................................................................................... 23
5.2.3.2 Steel failure.............................................................................................................................. 24
5.2.3.3 Concrete pryout failure ........................................................................................................... 25
5.2.3.4 Concrete edge failure .............................................................................................................. 27
5.2.4 Resistance to combined tension and shear loads ........................................................................... 33
6 Serviceability limit state .................................................................................................................................. 34
6.1 Displacements ...................................................................................................................................... 34
6.2 Shear load with changing sign .............................................................................................................. 34
7 Additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of concrete member .......................................... 34
7.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 34
7.2 Shear resistance of concrete member ................................................................................................. 35
7.3 Resistance to splitting forces ................................................................................................................ 36
 2 
74533.07
Introduction
The design method for bonded anchors given in the relevant ETA’s is based on the experience of a bond
resistance for anchors in the range up to 15 N/mm
2
and an intended embedment depth of 8 to 12 anchor
diameter. In the meantime anchors are on the market with significant higher bond resistance. Furthermore the
advantage of bonded anchors, to be installed with varying embedment, needs a modified design concept. This
concept is given in this Technical Report. It covers embedment of min h
ef
to 20 d. The minimum embedment
depth is given in the ETA, it should be not less than 4d and 40mm. Restriction of the embedment depth may be
given in the ETA.
Also the assessment and some tests in Part 5 need modifications, because it may be difficult to develop the
characteristic bond resistance. Following the concept of Part 5 predominantly steel failure and concrete cone
failure may be observed for shallow and deep embedment. These results are of minor interest.
The design method given in this Technical Report is based on Annex C with necessary modifications. It is valid
for anchors with European Technical Approval (ETA) according to the new approach with characteristic bond
resistance (t
Rk
) and it is based on the assumption that the required tests for assessing the admissible service
conditions given in Part 1 and Part 5 with modifications according to this Technical Report have been carried out.
The use of other design methods will require reconsideration of the necessary tests.
The ETA’s for anchors give the characteristic values only of the different approved anchors. The design of the
anchorages e.g. arrangement of anchors in a group of anchors, effect of edges or corners of the concrete
member on the characteristic resistance shall be carried out according to the design methods described in
Chapter 3 to 5 taking account of the corresponding characteristic values of the anchors.
Chapter 7 gives additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of the concrete.
The design method is valid for all types of bonded anchors except undercut bonded anchors, torque controlled
bonded anchors or post installed rebar connections. If values for the characteristic resistance, spacing, edge
distances and partial safety factors differ between the design methods and the ETA, the value given in the ETA
governs. In the absence of national regulations the partial safety factors given in the following may be used.
1 Scope
1.1 Type of anchors, anchor groups and number of anchors
The design method applies to the design of bonded anchors (according to Part 1 and 5) in concrete using
approved anchors which fulfil the requirements of this Guideline. The characteristic values of these anchors are
given in the relevant ETA.
The design method is valid for single anchors and anchor groups. In case of an anchor group the loads are
applied to the individual anchors of the group by means of a rigid fixture. In an anchor group only anchors of the
same type, size and length should be used.
The design method covers single anchors and anchor groups according to Figure 1.1 and 1.2. Other anchor
arrangements e.g. in a triangular or circular pattern are also allowed; however, the provisions of this design
method should be applied with engineering judgement.
In General this design method is valid only if the diameter d
f
of the clearance hole in the fixture is not larger than
the value according to Table 4.1.
Exceptions:
 For fastenings loaded in tension only a larger diameter of the clearance hole is acceptable if a correspondent
washer is used.
 For fastenings loaded in shear or combined tension and shear if the gap between the hole and the fixture is
filled with mortar of sufficient compression strength or eliminated by other suitable means.
 3 
74533.07
Figure 1.1 Anchorages covered by the design methods
 all loading directions, if anchors are situated far from edges (c > max (10 h
ef
; 60 d ))
 tension loading only, if anchors are situated close to edges (c < max (10 h
ef
; 60 d ))
Figure 1.2 Anchorages covered by the design methods
 shear loading, if anchors are situated close to an edge (c < max (10 h
ef
; 60 d ))
1.2 Concrete member
The concrete member should be of normal weight concrete of at least strength class C 20/25 and at most
strength class C 50/60 according to EN 206 and should be subjected only to predominantly static loads. The
concrete may be cracked or noncracked. In general for simplification it is assumed that the concrete is cracked;
otherwise it has to be shown that the concrete is noncracked (see 4.1).
1.3 Type and direction of load
The design methods apply to anchors subjected to static or quasistatic loadings and not to anchors subjected to
impact or seismic loadings.
1.4 Safety class
Anchorages carried out in accordance with these design methods are considered to belong to anchorages, the
failure of which would cause risk to human life and/or considerable economic consequences.
c
1
, c
2
< max
(10 h
ef
; 60 d ))
 4 
74533.07
2 Terminology and Symbols
The notations and symbols frequently used in the design methods are given below. Further notations are given
in the text.
2.1 Indices
S = action
R = resistance
M = material
k = characteristic value
d = design value
s = steel
c = concrete
cp = concrete pryout
p = pullout
sp = splitting
u = ultimate
y = yield
2.2 Actions and resistances
F = force in general (resulting force)
N = normal force (positive: tension force, negative: compression force)
V = shear force
M = moment
t = bond strength
F
Sk
(N
Sk
; V
Sk
; M
Sk
; M
T,Sk
) = characteristic value of actions acting on a single anchor or the fixture
of an anchor group respectively (normal load, shear load, bending
moment, torsion moment)
F
Sd
(N
Sd
; V
Sd
; M
Sd
, M
T,Sd
) = design value of actions
h
Sd
N ( V
Sd
h
) = design value of tensile load (shear load) acting on the most stressed
anchor of an anchor group calculated according to 4.2
N
Sd
g
( V
Sd
g
) = design value of the sum (resultant) of the tensile (shear) loads acting
on the tensioned (sheared) anchors of a group calculated according
to 4.2
F
Rk
(N
Rk
; V
Rk
) = characteristic value of resistance of a single anchor or an anchor
group respectively (normal force, shear force)
F
Rd
(N
Rd
; V
Rd
) = design value of resistance
2.3 Concrete and steel
f
ck,cube
= characteristic concrete compression strength measured on cubes with a side length of 150 mm
(value of concrete strength class according to EN 206)
f
yk
= characteristic steel yield strength (nominal value)
f
uk
= characteristic steel ultimate tensile strength (nominal value)
A
s
= stressed cross section of steel
W
el
= elastic section modulus calculated from the stressed cross section of steel (
td
3
32
for a round
section with diameter d)
 5 
74533.07
2.4 Characteristic values of anchors (see Figure 2.1)
a = spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors
a
1
= spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors in direction 1
a
2
= spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors in direction 2
b = width of concrete member
c = edge distance
c
1
= edge distance in direction 1; in case of anchorages close to an edge loaded in shear c
1
is the
edge distance in direction of the shear load (see Figure 2.1b and Figure 5.7)
c
2
= edge distance in direction 2; direction 2 is perpendicular to direction 1
c
cr,Np
= edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single
anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of pullout failure
c
cr,N
= edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single
anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of concrete cone failure
c
cr,sp
= edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single
anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of splitting failure
c
min
= minimum allowable edge distance
d = diameter of anchor bolt or thread diameter,
in case of internally threaded sockets outside diameter of socket
d
o
= drill hole diameter
h = thickness of concrete member
h
ef
= effective anchorage depth
h
min
= minimum thickness of concrete member
s = spacing of anchors in a group
s
1
= spacing of anchors in a group in direction 1
s
2
= spacing of anchors in a group in direction 2
s
cr,Np
= spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic resistance of a single anchor without
spacing and edge effects in case of pullout failure
s
cr,N
= spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor
without spacing and edge effects in case of concrete cone failure
s
cr,sp
= spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor
without spacing and edge effects in case of splitting failure
s
min
= minimum allowable spacing
 6 
74533.07
Figure 2.1 Concrete member, anchor spacing and edge distance
3 Design and safety concept
3.1 General
The design of anchorages shall be in accordance with the general rules given in EN 1990. It shall be shown that
the value of the design actions S
d
does not exceed the value of the design resistance R
d
.
S
d
≤ R
d
(3.1)
S
d
= value of design action
R
d
= value of design resistance
Actions to be used in design may be obtained from national regulations or in the absence of them from the
relevant parts of EN 1991.
The partial safety factors for actions may be taken from national regulations or in the absence of them according
to EN 1990.
The design resistance is calculated as follows:
R
d
= R
k
/¸
M
(3.2)
R
k
= characteristic resistance of a single anchor or an anchor group
¸
M
= partial safety factor for material
3.2 Ultimate limit state
3.2.1 Design resistance
The design resistance is calculated according to Equation (3.2).
3.2.2 Partial safety factors for resistances
In the absence of national regulations the following partial safety factors may be used:
3.2.2.1 Concrete cone failure, splitting failure, combined pullout and concrete cone failure, pryout
failure and edge failure
The partial safety factors for concrete cone failure, pryout failure and edge failure (¸
Mc
), splitting failure (¸
Msp
) and
combined pullout and concrete cone failure (¸
Mp
) are given in the relevant ETA.
For anchors to according to current experience the partial safety factor ¸
Mc
is determined from:
¸
Mc
= ¸
c
.
¸
2
¸
c
= partial safety factor for concrete = 1.5
¸
2
= partial safety factor taking account of the installation safety of an anchor system
 7 
74533.07
The partial safety factor ¸
2
is evaluated from the results of the installation safety tests,
see Part 5, 6.1.2.2.2.
Tension loading
¸
2
= 1.0 for systems with high installation safety
= 1.2 for systems with normal installation safety
= 1.4 for systems with low but still acceptable installation safety
Shear loading
¸
2
= 1.0
For the partial safety factors ¸
Msp
and ¸
Mp
the value for ¸
Mc
may be taken.
3.2.2.2 Steel failure
The partial safety factors ¸
Ms
for steel failure are given in the relevant ETA.
For anchors according to current experience the partial safety factors ¸
Ms
are determined as a function
of the type of loading as follows:
Tension loading:
¸
Ms
=
1.2
f / f
yk uk
> 1.4 (3.3a)
Shear loading of the anchor with and without lever arm:
¸
Ms
=
1.0
f / f
yk uk
> 1.25 f
uk
< 800 N/mm
2
(3.3b)
and f
yk
/f
uk
< 0.8
¸
Ms
= 1.5 f
uk
> 800 N/mm
2
(3.3c)
or f
yk
/f
uk
> 0.8
3.3 Serviceability limit state
In the serviceability limit state it shall be shown that the displacements occurring under the characteristic actions
are not larger than the admissible displacement. For the characteristic displacements see chapter 6. The
admissible displacement depends on the application in question and should be evaluated by the designer.
In this check the partial safety factors on actions and on resistances may be assumed to be equal to 1.0.
4 Static analysis
4.1 Noncracked and cracked concrete
If the condition in Equation (4.1) is not fulfilled or not checked, then cracked concrete is assumed.
Noncracked concrete may be assumed in special cases if in each case it is proved that under service
conditions the anchor with its entire anchorage depth is located in noncracked concrete. In the absence of other
guidance the following provisions may be taken.
For anchorages subjected to a resultant load F
Sk
< 60 kN noncracked concrete may be assumed if Equation
(4.1) is observed:
o
L
+ o
R
< 0 (4.1)
o
L
= stresses in the concrete induced by external loads, including anchors loads
o
R
= stresses in the concrete due to restraint of intrinsic imposed deformations (e.g. shrinkage of
concrete) or extrinsic imposed deformations (e.g. due to displacement of support or
temperature variations). If no detailed analysis is conducted, then o
R
= 3 N/mm
2
should be
assumed, according to EC 2.
 8 
74533.07
The stresses o
L
and o
R
are calculated assuming that the concrete is noncracked (state I). For plane concrete
members which transmit loads in two directions (e.g. slabs, walls) Equation (4.1) should be fulfilled for both
directions.
4.2 Loads acting on anchors
In the static analysis the loads and moments are given which are acting on the fixture. To design the anchorage
the loads acting on each anchor are calculated, taking into account partial safety factors for actions according to
3.1 in the ultimate limit state and according to 3.3 in the serviceability limit state.
With single anchors normally the loads acting on the anchor are equal to the loads acting on the fixture. With
anchor groups the loads, bending and torsion moments acting on the fixture are distributed to tension and shear
forces acting on the individual anchors of the group. This distribution shall be calculated according to the theory
of elasticity.
4.2.1 Tension loads
In general, the tension loads acting on each anchor due to loads and bending moments acting on the fixture
should be calculated according to the theory of elasticity using the following assumptions:
a) The anchor plate does not deform under the design actions. To ensure the validity of this assumption the
anchor plate has to be sufficiently stiff.
b) The stiffness of all anchors is equal and corresponds to the modulus of elasticity of the steel. The modulus of
elasticity of concrete is given in EC 2. As a simplification it may be taken as E
c
= 30 000 N/mm
2
.
c) In the zone of compression under the fixture the anchors do not contribute to the transmission of normal
forces (see Figure 4.1b).
If in special cases the anchor plate is not sufficiently stiff, then the flexibility of the anchor plate should be taken
into account when calculating loads acting on the anchors.
In the case of anchor groups with different levels of tension forces N
si
acting on the individual anchors of a group
the eccentricity e
N
of the tension force N
S
g
of the group may be calculated (see Figure 4.1), to enable a more
accurate assessment of the anchor group resistance.
If the tensioned anchors do not form a rectangular pattern, for reasons of simplicity the group of tensioned
anchors may be resolved into a group rectangular in shape (that means the centre of gravity of the tensioned
anchors may be assumed in the centre of the axis in Figure 4.1c)
 9 
74533.07
Figure 4.1 Example of anchorages subjected to an eccentric tensile load N
g
S
 10 
74533.07
4.2.2 Shear loads
4.2.2.1 Distribution of shear loads
The distribution of shear loads depends on the mode of failure:
a) Steel failure and concrete pryout failure
It is assumed that all anchors of a group take up shear load if the diameter d
f
of clearance hole in the
fixture is not larger than the value given in Table 4.1 (see Figure 4.2 and 4.6).
b) Concrete edge failure
Only the most unfavourable anchors take up shear loads if the shear acts perpendicular towards the
edge (see Figure 4.3 and 4.7). All anchors take up shear loads acting parallel to the edge.
Slotted holes in direction of the shear load prevent anchors to take up shear loads. This can be favourable in
case of fastenings close to an edge (see Figure 4.4).
If the diameter d
f
of clearance hole in the fixture is larger than given in Table 4.1 the design method is only valid
if the gap between the bolt and the fixture is filled with mortar of sufficient compression strength or eliminated by
other suitable means.
Table 4.1 Diameter of clearance hole in the fixture
external diameter
d
1)
or d
nom
2)
(mm)
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
27
30
diameter d
f
of clearance
hole in the fixture (mm)
7
9
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
30
33
1)
if bolt bears against the fixture
2)
if sleeve bears against the fixture
Figure 4.2 Examples of load distribution, when all anchors take up shear loads
 11 
74533.07
Figure 4.3 Examples of load distribution, when only the most unfavourable anchors take up shear loads
Figure 4.4 Examples of load distribution for a fastening with slotted holes
In the case of anchor groups with different levels of shear forces V
si
acting on the individual anchors of the group
the eccentricity e
v
of the shear force V
S
g
of the group may be calculated (see Figure 4.5), to enable a more
accurate assessment of the anchor group resistance.
Figure 4.5 Example for a fastening subjected to an eccentric shear load
4.2.2.2 Determination of shear loads
The determination of shear loads to the fasteners in a group resulting from shear forces and torsion moments
acting on the fixture is calculated according to the theory of elasticity assuming equal stiffness for all fasteners of
a group. Equilibrium has to be satisfied. Examples are given in Figs 4.6 and 4.7.
 12 
74533.07
Figure 4.6 Determination of shear loads when all anchors take up loads (steel and pryout failure)
V
Sd
V
Sd
/ 3
V
Sd
V
Sd
/ 4
V
Sd
/ 4
b) Group of four anchors under a shear load
V
Sd V
Sd,v
V
Sd,h
V
Sd,h
/4
V
Sd,v
/4
V
Sd,h
/4
V
Sd,v
/4
V
Sd,h
/4
V
Sd,v
/4
V
Sd,h
/4
V
Sd,v
/4
c) Group of four anchors under an inclined shear load
T
Sd
s
1
s
2
V
anchor
V
anchor
V
anchor
V
anchor
d) Group of four anchors under a torsion moment
 
5 . 0 2
2
2
1
p
Sd
anchor
) 2 / s ( ) 2 / s (
I
T
V + · = with: I
p
= radial moment of inertia (here: I
p
= s
1
2
+ s
2
2
)
a) Group of three anchors under a shear load
 13 
74533.07
Figure 4.7 Determination of shear loads when only the most unfavourable anchors take up loads
(concrete edge failure)
In case of concrete edge failure where only the most unfavourable anchors take up load the component of the
load acting perpendicular to the edge are taken up by the most unfavourable anchors (anchors close to the
edge), while the components of the load acting parallel to the edge are – due to reasons of equilibrium – equally
distributed to all anchors of the group.
4.2.2.3 Shear loads without lever arm
Shear loads acting on anchors may be assumed to act without lever arm if both of the following conditions are
fulfilled:
a) The fixture shall be made of metal and in the area of the anchorage be fixed directly to the concrete either
without an intermediate layer or with a levelling layer of mortar (compression strength ≥ 30 N/mm
2
) with a
thickness < d/2.
b) The fixture shall be in contact with the anchor over its entire thickness.
b) Group of two anchors loaded parallel to the edge
Edge
Load to be considered
Load not to be considered
V
Sd
V
Sd
/2
Loaded anchor
Unloaded anchor
Edge
V
Sd
V
Sd
a) Group of two anchors loaded by a shear load perpendicular to the edge
Edge
V
Sd
o
V
V
H
/4
V
V
/2
Load to be considered
Load not to be considered
c) Group of four anchors loaded by an inclined shear load
V
V
= V
Sd
· cos o
V
V
H
= V
Sd
· sin o
V
 14 
74533.07
4.2.2.4 Shear loads with lever arm
If the conditions a) and b) of 4.2.2.3 are not fulfilled the lever arm is calculated according to Equation (4.2) (see
Figure 4.8)
= a
3
+ e
1
(4.2)
with
e
1
= distance between shear load and concrete surface
a
3
= 0.5 d
a
3
= 0 if a washer and a nut is directly clamped to the concrete surface (see Figure 4.8b)
d = nominal diameter of the anchor bolt or thread diameter (see Figure 4.8a)
Figure 4.8 Definition of lever arm
The design moment acting on the anchor is calculated according to Equation (4.3)
M
Sd
= V
Sd
.
o
M
(4.3)
The value o
M
depends on the degree of restraint of the anchor at the side of the fixture of the application in
question and shall be judged according to good engineering practice.
No restraint (o
M
= 1.0) shall be assumed if the fixture can rotate freely (see Figure 4.9a). This assumption is
always on the safe side.
Full restraint (o
M
= 2.0) may be assumed only if the fixture cannot rotate (see Figure 4.9b) and the hole
clearance in the fixture is smaller than the values given in Table 4.1 or the anchor is clamped to the fixture by nut
and washer (see Figure 4.8). If restraint of the anchor is assumed the fixture shall be able to take up the restraint
moment.
Figure 4.9 Fixture without (a) and with (b) restraint
 15 
74533.07
5 Ultimate limit state
5.1 General
According to Equation (3.1) it has to be shown that the design value of the action is equal to or smaller than the
design value of the resistance. The characteristic values of the anchor to be used for the calculation of the
resistance in the ultimate limit state are given in the relevant ETA.
Spacing, edge distance as well as thickness of concrete member should not remain under the given minimum
values.
The spacing between outer anchor of adjoining groups or the distance to single anchors should be a > s
cr,N
.
5.2 Design method
5.2.1 General
It has to be shown that Equation (3.1) is observed for all loading directions (tension, shear) as well as all failure
modes (steel failure, combined pullout and concrete cone failure, concrete cone failure, splitting failure,
concrete edge failure and concrete pryout failure).
In case of a combined tension and shear loading (oblique loading) the condition of interaction according to 5.2.4
should be observed.
5.2.2 Resistance to tension loads
5.2.2.1 Required proofs
single anchor
anchor group
steel failure
N
Sd
< N
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
N
Sd
h
< N
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
combined pullout and
concrete cone failure
N
Sd
< N
Rk,p
/ ¸
Mp
N
Sd
g
< N
Rk,p
/ ¸
Mp
concrete cone failure
N
Sd
< N
Rk,c
/ ¸
Mc
N
Sd
g
< N
Rk,c
/ ¸
Mc
splitting failure
N
Sd
< N
Rk,sp
/ ¸
Msp
N
Sd
g
< N
Rk,sp
/ ¸
Msp
5.2.2.2 Steel failure
The characteristic resistance of an anchor in case of steel failure, N
Rk,s
, is
N
Rk,s
= A
s
.
f
uk
[N] (5.1)
N
Rk,s
is given in the relevant ETA.
5.2.2.3 Combined pull out and concrete cone failure
The characteristic resistance in case of combined pull out and concrete cone failure, N
Rk,p
, is
N
Rk,p
= N
0
Rk,p
.
0
N p,
N p,
A
A
.¢
s,Np
. ¢
g,Np
. ¢
ec,Np
. ¢
re,Np
[N] (5.2)
The different factors of Equation (5.2) for anchors according to current experience are given below:
a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor is obtained by:
0
Rk,p
N = t · d
.
h
ef
. t
Rk
[N] (5.2a)
t
Rk
[N/mm
2
]; h
ef
and d [mm]
 16 
74533.07
t
Rk
characteristic bond resistance, depending on the concrete strength class, values given for
applications in cracked concrete (t
Rk,cr
) or for applications in noncracked concrete (t
Rk,ucr
) in the
relevant ETA
b) The geometric effect of spacing and edge distance on the characteristic resistance is taken into account
by the value A
p,N
/
0
N p,
A , where:
0
N p,
A = influence area of an individual anchor with large spacing and edge distance at the
concrete surface, idealizing the concrete cone as a pyramid with a base length equal to
s
cr,Np
(see Figure 5.1).
= s
cr,Np
· s
cr,Np
(5.2b)
A
p,N
= actual area; it is limited by overlapping areas of adjoining anchors (s < s
cr,Np
) as well as
by edges of the concrete member (c < c
cr,Np
). Examples for the calculation of A
p,N
are
given in Figure 5.2.
with
ef
5 . 0
ucr , Rk
Np , cr
h 3
5 . 7
d 20 s · s


.

\

· · =
t
[mm] (5.2c)
with t
Rk,ucr
for C20/25 [N/mm
2
]; d [mm]
2
s
c
Np , cr
Np , cr
= [mm] (5.2d)
Note: The values according to Equations (5.2c) and (5.2d) are valid for both cracked and noncracked
concrete.
Figure 5.1 Influence area
0
N p,
A of an individual anchor
 17 
74533.07
Figure 5.2 Examples of actual areas A
p,N
for different arrangements of anchors in the case of axial tension
load
c) The factor ¢
s,Np
takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to
edges of the concrete member. For anchorages with several edge distances (e.g. anchorage in a corner
of the concrete member or in a narrow member), the smallest edge distance, c, shall be inserted in
Equation (5.2e).
¢
s,Np
= 0.7 + 0.3
.
Np cr,
c
c
< 1 (5.2e)
a) individual anchor at the edge of concrete member
b) group of two anchors at the edge of concrete member
c) group of four a
chors at a corner of concrete member
c) group of four anchors at a corner of concrete member
 18 
74533.07
d) The factor, ¢
g,Np
, takes account of the effect of the failure surface for anchor groups
( ) 0 , 1 1
s
s
0
Np , g
5 , 0
Np , cr
0
Np , g Np , g
> ÷ ·


.

\

÷ = ¢ ¢ ¢ (5.2f)
s = spacing, in case of anchor groups with s
1
≠ s
2
the mean value of all spacings s
1
and s
2
should be taken
with
( ) 0 , 1 1
5 , 1
,
0
,
>


.

\

· ·
·
· ÷ ÷ =
cube ck ef
Rk
Np g
f h k
d
n n
t
¢ (5.2g)
n = number of anchors in a group
t
Rk
and f
ck,cube
[N/mm
2
]; h
ef
and d [mm]
t
Rk
characteristic bond resistance, depending on the concrete strength class is taken from the
relevant ETA:
k = 2.3 (for applications in cracked concrete)
k = 3.2 (for applications in noncracked concrete)
e) The factor of ¢
ec,Np
takes account of a group effect when different tension loads are acting
on the individual anchors of a group.
¢
ec,Np
=
Np cr, N
/s 2e 1
1
+
< 1 (5.2h)
e
N
= eccentricity of the resulting tensile load acting on the tensioned anchors (see 4.2.1).
Where there is an eccentricity in two directions, ¢
ec,N
shall be determined separately for
each direction and the product of both factors shall be inserted in Equation (5.2).
f) The shell spalling factor, ¢
re,Np
, takes account of the effect of a dense reinforcement
¢
re,Np
= 0.5 +
200
h
ef
< 1 (5.2i)
h
ef
[mm]
If in the area of the anchorage there is a reinforcement with a spacing > 150 mm (any diameter) or with
a diameter < 10 mm and a spacing > 100 mm then a shell spalling factor of ¢
re,Np
= 1.0 may be applied
independently of the anchorage depth.
g) Special cases
For anchorages with three or more edges with an edge distance c
max
< c
cr,Np
(c
max
= largest edge
distance) (see Figure 5.3) the calculation according to Equation 5.2 leads to results which are on the
safe side.
More precise results are obtained if for h
ef
the larger value of
h
ef
'
=
Np , cr
max
c
c
.
h
ef
or h
ef
'
=
Np cr
s
s
,
max
.
h
ef
is inserted in Equation (5.2a) and for the determination of A
c,N
0
and A
c,N
according to Figures 5.1 and
5.2 as well as in Equations (5.2b) to (5.2h) the values
'
Np cr,
s =
Np cr,
max
c
c
.
s
cr,Np
Np cr
ef
ef
Np cr
s
h
h
s
,
'
'
,
· =
'
Np cr,
c = 0.5
.
s’
cr,Np
are inserted for s
cr,Np
or c
cr,Np
, respectively.
 19 
74533.07
Figure 5.3 Examples of anchorages in concrete members where h’
ef
,
'
Np cr,
s and
'
Np cr,
c may be used
5.2.2.4 Concrete cone failure
The characteristic resistance of an anchor or a group of anchors, respectively, in case of concrete cone failure
is:
N
Rk,c
= N
Rk,c
0
.
A
A
c,N
c,N
0
.¢
s,N
. ¢
re,N
. ¢
ec,N
. [N] (5.3)
The different factors of Equation (5.3) for anchors according to current experience are given below:
a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor placed in cracked or noncracked concrete
is obtained by:
N
Rk,c
0
= k
1
· f
ck,cube
. h
ef
1.5
[N] (5.3a)
f
ck,cube
[N/mm
2
]; h
ef
[mm]
k
1
= 7.2 for applications in cracked concrete
k
1
= 10.1 for applications in noncracked concrete
b) The geometric effect of spacing and edge distance on the characteristic resistance is taken into account
by the value A
c,N
/ A
c,N
0
, where:
A
c,N
0
= area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing and edge distance at the
concrete surface, idealizing the concrete cone as a pyramid with a height equal to h
ef
and a base length equal to s
cr,N
(see Figure 5.4a).
= s
cr,N
· s
cr,N
with s
cr,N
= 3 h
ef
(5.3b)
A
c,N
= actual area of concrete cone of the anchorage at the concrete surface. It is limited by
overlapping concrete cones of adjoining anchors (s < s
cr,N
) as well as by edges of the
concrete member (c < c
cr,N
). Examples for the calculation of A
c,N
are given in
Figure 5.4b.
 20 
74533.07
Figure 5.4a Idealized concrete cone and area A
c,N
0
of concrete cone of an individual anchor
 21 
74533.07
Figure 5.4b Examples of actual areas A
c,N
of the idealized concrete cones for different arrangements of
anchors in the case of axial tension load
a) individual anchor at the edge of concrete member
b) group of two anchors at the edge of concrete member
c) group of four anchors at a corner of concrete member
 22 
74533.07
c) The factor ¢
s,N
takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to
edges of the concrete member. For anchorages with several edge distances (e.g. anchorage in a corner
of the concrete member or in a narrow member), the smallest edge distance, c, shall be inserted in
Equation (5.3c).
¢
s,N
= 0.7 + 0.3
.
c
c
cr,N
< 1 (5.3c)
d) The shell spalling factor, ¢
re,N
, takes account of the effect of a reinforcement
¢
re,N
= 0.5 +
h
200
ef
< 1 (5.3d)
h
ef
[mm]
If in the area of the anchorage there is a reinforcement with a spacing > 150 mm (any diameter) or with
a diameter < 10 mm and a spacing > 100 mm then a shell spalling factor of ¢
re,N
= 1.0 may be applied
independently of the anchorage depth.
e) The factor of ¢
ec,N
takes account of a group effect when different tension loads are acting
on the individual anchors of a group.
¢
ec,N
=
1
1 2e / s
N cr,N
+
< 1 (5.3e)
e
N
= eccentricity of the resulting tensile load acting on the tensioned anchors (see 4.2.1).
Where there is an eccentricity in two directions, ¢
ec,N
shall be determined separately for
each direction and the product of both factors shall be inserted in Equation (5.3).
f) Special cases
For anchorages with three or more edges with an edge distance c
max
< c
cr,N
(c
max
= largest edge
distance) (see Figure 5.3) the calculation according to Equation 5.3 leads to results which are on the
safe side.
More precise results are obtained if for h
ef
the larger value of
'
ef
h =
c
c
cr N
max
,
.
h
ef
or h
ef
'
=
N cr
s
s
,
max
.
h
ef
is inserted in Equation (5.3a) and for the determination of A
c,N
0
and A
c,N
according to Figures 5.3 and
5.4 as well as in Equations (5.3b), (5.3c) and (5.3e) the values
'
N cr,
s = 3 h
ef
'
N cr
ef
ef
N cr
s
h
h
s
,
'
'
,
· =
c
cr,N
'
= 0,5 s’
cr,N
are inserted for s
cr,N
or c
cr,N
, respectively.
5.2.2.5 Splitting failure due to anchor installation
Splitting failure is avoided during anchor installation by complying with minimum values for edge distance c
min
,
spacing s
min
, member thickness h
min
and reinforcement as given in the relevant ETA.
5.2.2.6 Splitting failure due to loading
For splitting failure due to loading the values c
cr,sp
and s
cr,sp
shall be taken from the ETA as a function of the
embedment depth.
a) It may be assumed that splitting failure will not occur, if the edge distance in all directions is c > 1.2
c
cr
,
sp
and the member depth is h > 2 h
min
.
b) With anchors suitable for use in cracked concrete, the calculation of the characteristic splitting
resistance may be omitted if the following two conditions are fulfilled:
÷ a reinforcement is present which limits the crack width to w
k
~ 0.3 mm, taking into account the
splitting forces according to 7.3
÷ the characteristic resistance for concrete cone failure and pullout failure is calculated for cracked
concrete.
 23 
74533.07
If the conditions a) or b) are fulfilled the calculation of the characteristic splitting resistance may be omitted. In all
other cases the characteristic resistance of a single anchor or an anchor group in case of splitting failure should
be calculated according to Equation (5.4)
N
Rk,sp
= N
Rk,c
0
.
A
A
c,N
c,N
0
.¢
s,N
. ¢
re,N
. ¢
ec,N
. ¢
h,sp
[N] (5.4)
with
0
Rk,c
N , ¢
s,N
, ¢
re,N
, ¢
ec,N
according to Equations (5.3a) to (5.3e) and A
c,N
.,
0
,N c
A as defined in
5.2.2.4 b), however the values c
cr,N
and s
cr,N
should be replaced by c
cr,sp
and s
cr,sp
.
¢
h,sp
= factor to account for the influence of the actual member depth, h, on the splitting resistance
for anchors according to current experience
=


.

\

min
h
h
2 3 /
(5.4a)
with
3
2
min
ef
sp , h
h
h 2
1


.

\
 ·
s s¢ (5.4b).
If the edge distance of an anchor is smaller than the value c
cr,sp
then a longitudinal reinforcement should be
provided along the edge of the member.
The special case for anchorages with three or more edges as specified in 5.2.2.4f) also applies for splitting
failure due to loading. The modified value of h’
ef
is inserted in Equation (5.3a) and for the determination of A
0
c,N
and A
c,N
according to Figures 5.3 and 5.4. Furthermore, in Equations (5.3b), (5.3c) and (5.3e) the values for
s’
cr,sp
and c’
cr,sp
are inserted for s
cr,N
or c
cr,N
, respectively. In Equation (5.4b) the actual value h
ef
is used in the
special case situation.
5.2.3 Resistance to shear loads
5.2.3.1 Required proofs
single anchor
anchor group
steel failure, shear load
without lever arm
V
Sd
< V
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
V
Sd
h
< V
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
steel failure, shear load
with lever arm
V
Sd
< V
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
V
Sd
h
< V
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
concrete pryout failure
V
Sd
< V
Rk,cp
/ ¸
Mc
V
Sd
g
< V
Rk,cp
/ ¸
Mc
concrete edge failure V
Sd
< V
Rk,c
/ ¸
Mc
V
Sd
g
< V
Rk,c
/ ¸
Mc
 24 
74533.07
5.2.3.2 Steel failure
a) Shear load without lever arm
The characteristic resistance of an anchor in case of steel failure, V
Rk,s
is taken from the relevant ETA. In
case of current experience it is given by Equation (5.5).
V
Rk,s
= 0.5 ·A
s
· f
uk
[N] (5.5)
V
Rk,s
is given in the relevant ETA.
In case of anchor groups, the characteristic shear resistance given in the relevant ETA is multiplied with
a factor 0.8, if the anchor is made of steel with a rather low ductility (rupture elongation A
5
< 8%)
 25 
74533.07
b) Shear load with lever arm
The characteristic resistance of an anchor, V
Rk,s
, is given by Equation (5.6).
V
Rk,s
=
o
M Rk,s
M ·
[N] (5.6)
where o
M
= see 4.2.2.4
= lever arm according to Equation (4.2)
M
Rk,s
= M
Rk,s
0
(1  N
Sd
/N
Rd,s
) [Nm] (5.6a)
N
Rd,s
= N
Rk,s
/ ¸
Ms
N
Rk,s
, ¸
Ms
to be taken from the relevant ETA
M
Rk,s
0
= characteristic bending resistance of an individual anchor
The characteristic bending resistance M
Rk,s
0
shall be taken from the relevant ETA.
The value of M
Rk,s
0
for anchors according to current experience is obtained from Equation (5.6b).
M
Rk,s
0
= 1.2 ·W
el
· f
uk
[Nm] (5.6b)
5.2.3.3 Concrete pryout failure
Anchorages with short stiff anchors can fail by a concrete pryout failure at the side opposite to load direction
(see Figure 5.5). The corresponding characteristic resistance V
Rk,cp
may be calculated from Equation (5.7) and
(5.7a); the lowest value of (5.7) and (5.7a) is decisive.
.
V
Rk,cp
= k
.
N
Rk,p
(5.7)
V
Rk,cp
= k
.
N
Rk,c
(5.7a)
where k = factor to be taken from the relevant ETA
N
Rk,p
and N
Rk,c
according to 5.2.2.3 and 5.2.2.4 determined for single anchors or all anchors of a group
loaded in shear.
For anchors according to current experience failing under tension load by concrete cone failure the
following values are on the safe side
k = 1 h
ef
< 60mm (5.7b)
k = 2 h
ef
> 60mm (5.7c)
Figure 5.5 Concrete pryout failure on the side opposite to load direction
Verification of pryout failure for the most unfavourable anchor
 26 
74533.07
In cases where the group is loaded by shear loads and/or external torsion moments, the direction of the
individual shear loads may alter. Fig. 5.5a demonstrates this for a group of two anchors loaded by a torsion
moment.
It is selfexplanatory that Equation (5.7) and (5.7a) are not suitable for this application. The shear loads acting on
the individual anchors neutralise each other and the shear load acting on the entire group is V
Sd
= 0.
Figure 5.5a Group of anchors loaded by a torsion moment; shear loads acting on the individual anchors of
the group alter their directions
In cases where the horizontal or vertical components of the shear loads on the anchors alter their direction within
a group the verification of pryout failure for the entire group is substituted by the verification of pryout failure for
the most unfavourable anchor of the group.
When calculating the resistance of the most unfavourable anchor the influences of both, edge distances as well
as anchor spacing should be considered. Examples for the calculation of A
c,N
are given in Fig. 5.5b.
s
V
1
= T / s
V
2
= T / s
T
 27 
74533.07
Figure 5.5b Examples for the calculation of the area A
c,N
of the idealised concrete cones
5.2.3.4 Concrete edge failure
Concrete edge failure need not to be verified for groups with not more than 4 anchors when the edge distance in
all directions is c > 10 h
ef
and c > 60 d.
The characteristic resistance for an anchor or an anchor group in the case of concrete edge failure corresponds
to:
V
Rk,c
=
0
Rk,c
V
.
A
A
c V
c V
,
,
0
.
¢
s,V
.
¢
h,V
.
¢
o,V
.
¢
ec,V
.
¢
re,V
[N] (5.8)
The different factors of Equation (5.8) for anchors according to current experience are given below:
a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor placed in cracked or noncracked concrete and
loaded perpendicular to the edge corresponds to:
5 . 1
1 , 1
0
,
c f h d k V
cube ck ef c Rk
· · · · =
 o
[N] (5.8a)
d, h
ef
, c
1
[mm]; f
ck,cube
[N/mm
2
]
with
k
1
= 1.7 for applications in cracked concrete
k
1
= 2.4 for applications in noncracked concrete
5 . 0
1
ef
c
h
1 . 0


.

\

· = o (5.8b)
 28 
74533.07
2 . 0
1
c
d
1 . 0


.

\

· =  (5.8c)
b) The geometrical effect of spacing as well as of further edge distances and the effect of thickness of the
concrete member on the characteristic load is taken into account by the ratio A
c,V
/ A
c,V
0
.
where:
A
c,V
0
= area of concrete cone of an individual anchor at the lateral concrete surface not affected by
edges parallel to the assumed loading direction, member thickness or adjacent anchors,
assuming the shape of the fracture area as a half pyramid with a height equal to c
1
and a
baselength of 1.5 c
1
and 3 c
1
(Figure 5.6).
= 4,5 c
1
2
(5.8d)
A
c,V
= actual area of concrete cone of anchorage at the lateral concrete surface. It is limited by the
overlapping concrete cones of adjoining anchors (s < 3 c
1
) as well as by edges parallel to the
assumed loading direction (c
2
< 1.5 c
1
) and by member thickness (h < 1.5 c
1
). Examples for
calculation of A
c,V
are given in Figure 5.7.
For the calculation of A
c,V
0
and A
c,V
it is assumed that the shear loads are applied perpendicular to the edge of
the concrete member.
Figure 5.6 Idealized concrete cone and area A
0
c,V
of concrete cone for a single anchor
 29 
74533.07
Figure 5.7 Examples of actual areas of the idealized concrete cones for different anchor arrangements
under shear loading
 30 
74533.07
c) The factor ¢
s,V
takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to
further edges of the concrete member on the shear resistance. For anchorages with two edges parallel
to the assumed direction of loading (e.g. in a narrow concrete member) the smaller edge distance shall
be inserted in Equation (5.8e).
¢
s,V
= 0.7 + 0.3
.
c
1.5 c
2
1
< 1 (5.8e)
d) The factor ¢
h,V
takes account of the fact that the shear resistance does not decrease proportionally to
the member thickness as assumed by the ratio A
c,V
/ A
c,V
0
.
¢
h,V
= (
15
1
. c
h
)
1/2
> 1 (5.8f)
e) The factor ¢
oV
takes account of the angle o
V
between the load applied, V
Sd
, and the direction
perpendicular to the free edge of the concrete member (o
v
≤ 90°, see Figure 4.7c).
0 . 1
5 . 2
sin
) (cos
1
2
V 2
V
V ,
>

.

\

+
=
o
o
¢
o
(5.8g)
The maximum value o
v
to be inserted in equation (5.8g) is limited to 90°.
In case of α
V
> 90°it is assumed that only the component of the shear load parallel to the edge is acting
on the anchor. The component acting away from the edge may be neglected for the proof of concrete
edge failure. Examples of anchor groups loaded by M
Td
, V
Sd
or both are given in Fig. 5.8 and Fig.5.9.
 31 
74533.07
no proof for concrete edge failure needed,
components directed away from the edge
a) group of anchors at an edge loaded by V
Sd
with an angle α
V
= 180°
b) group of anchors at an edge loaded by V
Sd
with an angle 90 < α
V
< 180°
action
load on each
anchor
load on anchor
group for
calculation
components neglected, because
directed away from the edge
c) group of anchors at the edge loaded by a torsion moment M
Td
action
load on each
anchor
load on anchor
group for
calculation
e
V
Component neglected, because
directed away from the edge
Figure 5.8 Examples of anchor groups at the edge loaded by a shear force or a torsion
moment
co
m
po
ne
nt
s
is
dir
ec
te
d
to
w
ar
ds
th
e
ed
ge
α
V
 32 
74533.07
action
load on each
anchor
neglected because sum of
components is directed
away from the edge
load on anchor
group
V
Sd
e
V
load on anchor
group for
calculation
a) shear component due to torsion moment larger than component of shear force
V
Sd
e
V
b) shear component due to torsion moment smaller than component of shear force
action
load on each
anchor
load on anchor
group
load on anchor
group for
calculation
Considered because sum of
components is directed
towards the edge
Figure 5.9 Examples of anchors groups at the edge loaded by a shear
force and a torsion moment
 33 
74533.07
f) The factor ¢
ec,V
takes account of a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual
anchors of a group.
¢
ec,V
=
1
1 2 3
1
+ e c
V
/ ( )
< 1 (5.8h)
e
V
= eccentricity of the resulting shear load acting on the anchors (see 4.2.2).
g) The factor ¢
re,V
takes account of the effect of the type of reinforcement used in cracked concrete.
¢
re,V
= 1.0 anchorage in noncracked concrete and anchorage in cracked concrete without edge
reinforcement
¢
re,V
= 1.2 anchorage in cracked concrete with straight edge reinforcement (> Ø12 mm)
¢
re,V
= 1.4 anchorage in cracked concrete with edge reinforcement and closely spaced stirrups
(a < 100 mm)
h) For anchorages placed at a corner, the resistances for both edges shall be calculated and the smallest
value is decisive.
i) Special cases
For anchorages in a narrow, thin member with c
2,max
< 1.5 c
1
(c
2,max
= greatest of the two edge distances
parallel to the direction of loading) and h < 1.5 c
1
(see Figure 5.10) the calculation according to Equation
(5.8) leads to results which are on the safe side.
More precise results are achieved if in Equations (5.8a) to (5.8fh) as well as in the determination of the
areas A
c,V
0
and A
c,V
according to Figures 5.6 and 5.7 the edge distance c
1
is replaced by the value of
c’
1
. c’
1
being the greatest of the values c
2max
/1.5 and h/1.5 or s
2max
/3 in case of anchor groups
Figure 5.10 Example of an anchorage in a thin, narrow member where the value c’
1
may be used
5.2.4 Resistance to combined tension and shear loads
For combined tension and shear loads the following Equations (see Figure 5.11) shall be satisfied:

N
< 1 (5.9a)

V
< 1 (5.9b)

N
+ 
V
< 1.2 (5.9c)
where

N
(
V
) ratio between design action and design resistance for tension (shear) loading.
In Equation (5.9) the largest value of 
N
and 
V
for the different failure modes shall be taken (see 5.2.2.1
and 5.2.3.1).
 34 
74533.07
Figure 5.11 Interaction diagram for combined tension and shear loads
In general, Equations (5.9a) to (5.9c) yield conservative results. More accurate results are obtained by
Equation (5.10)
(
N
)
o
+ (
V
)
o
< 1 (5.10)
with:

N
, 
V
see Equations (5.9)
o = 2.0 if N
Rd
and V
Rd
are governed by steel failure
o = 1.5 for all other failure modes
6 Serviceability limit state
6.1 Displacements
The characteristic displacement of the anchor under defined tension and shear loads shall be taken from the
ETA. It may be assumed that the displacements are a linear function of the applied load. In case of a combined
tension and shear load, the displacements for the tension and shear component of the resultant load should be
geometrically added.
In case of shear loads the influence of the hole clearance in the fixture on the expected displacement of the
whole anchorage shall be taken into account.
6.2 Shear load with changing sign
If the shear loads acting on the anchor change their sign several times, appropriate measures shall be taken to
avoid a fatigue failure of the anchor steel (e.g. the shear load should be transferred by friction between the
fixture and the concrete (e.g. due to a sufficiently high permanent prestressing force)).
Shear loads with changing sign can occur due to temperature variations in the fastened member (e.g. facade
elements). Therefore, either these members are anchored such that no significant shear loads due to the
restraint of deformations imposed to the fastened element will occur in the anchor or in shear loading with lever
arm (standoff installation) the bending stresses in the most stressed anchor Ao = maxo  mino in the
serviceability limit state caused by temperature variations should be limited to 100 N/mm
2
.
7 Additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of concrete member
7.1 General
The proof of the local transmission of the anchor loads into the concrete member is delivered by using the
design methods described in this document.
The transmission of the anchor loads to the supports of the concrete member shall be shown for the ultimate
limit state and the serviceability limit state; for this purpose, the normal verifications shall be carried out under
due consideration of the actions introduced by the anchors. For these verifications the additional provisions given
in 7.2 and 7.3 should be taken into account.
 35 
74533.07
If the edge distance of an anchor is smaller than the characteristic edge distance c
cr,N
, then a longitudinal
reinforcement of at least C 6 shall be provided at the edge of the member in the area of the anchorage depth.
In case of slabs and beams made out of prefabricated units and added castinplace concrete, anchor loads may
be transmitted into the prefabricated concrete only if the precast concrete is connected with the castinplace
concrete by a shear reinforcement. If this shear reinforcement between precast and castinplace concrete is not
present, the anchors should be embedded with h
ef
in the added concrete. Otherwise only the loads of suspended
ceilings or similar constructions with a load up to 1.0 kN/m
2
may be anchored in the precast concrete.
7.2 Shear resistance of concrete member
In general, the shear forces V
Sd,a
caused by anchor loads should not exceed the value
V
Sd,a
= 0.4 V
Rd1
(7.1)
with:
V
Rd1
= shear resistance according Eurocode No. 2 [1]
When calculating V
Sd,a
the anchor loads shall be assumed as point loads with a width of load application
t
1
= s
t1
+ 2 h
ef
and t
2
= s
t2
+ 2 h
ef
, with s
t1
(s
t2
) spacing between the outer anchors of a group in direction 1 (2).
The active width over which the shear force is transmitted should be calculated according to the theory of
elasticity.
Equation (7.1) may be neglected, if one of the following conditions is met
a) The shear force V
Sd
at the support caused by the design actions including the anchor loads is
V
Sd
< 0.8 V
Rd1
(7.2)
b) Under the characteristic actions, the resultant tension force, N
Sk
, of the tensioned fasteners is N
Sk
< 30 kN
and the spacing, a, between the outermost anchors of adjacent groups or between the outer anchors of a
group and individual anchors satisfies Equation (7.3)
a > 200
.
N
Sk
a [mm]; N
Sk
[kN] (7.3)
c) The anchor loads are taken up by a hanger reinforcement, which encloses the tension reinforcement and is
anchored at the opposite side of the concrete member. Its distance from an individual anchor or the
outermost anchors of a group should be smaller than h
ef
If under the characteristic actions, the resultant tension force, N
Sk
, of the tensioned fasteners is N
Sk
> 60 kN,
then either the embedment depth of the anchors should be h
ef
> 0,8 h or a hanger reinforcement according to
paragraph c) above should be provided.
The necessary checks for ensuring the required shear resistance of the concrete member are summarized in
Table 7.1.
 36 
74533.07
Table 7.1 Necessary checks for ensuring the required shear resistance of concrete member
Calculated value of shear
force of the concrete
member under due
consideration of the anchor
loads
Spacing between single
anchors and groups of
anchors
N
Sk
[kN]
Proof of calculated shear
force resulting from anchor
loads
V
Sd
< 0.8
.
V
Rd1
a > s
cr,N
< 60 not required
V
Sd
> 0.8
.
V
Rd1
a > s
cr,N
and
a > 200 · N
Sk
< 30 not required
a > s
cr,N
< 60
required:
V
Sd,a
< 0.4
.
V
Rd1
or hanger reinforcement
or h
ef
> 0.8 h
> 60
not required, but hanger
reinforcement or h
ef
> 0.8 h
7.3 Resistance to splitting forces
In general, the splitting forces caused by anchors should be taken into account in the design of the concrete
member. This may be neglected if one of the following conditions is met:
a) The load transfer area is in the compression zone of the concrete member.
b) The tension component N
Sk
of the characteristic loads acting on the anchorage (single anchor or group of
anchors) is smaller than 10 kN.
c) The tension component N
Sk
is not greater than 30 kN. In addition, for fastenings in slabs and walls a
concentrated reinforcement in both directions is present in the region of the anchorage. The area of the
transverse reinforcement should be at least 60 % of the longitudinal reinforcement required for the actions
due to anchor loads.
If the characteristic tension load acting on the anchorage is N
Sk
> 30 kN and the anchors are located in the
tension zone of the concrete member the splitting forces shall be taken up by reinforcement. As a first indication
for anchors according to current experience the ratio between splitting force F
Sp,k
and the characteristic tension
load N
Sk
may be taken as
F
Sp,k
= 0.5 N
Sk
for bonded anchors.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Design method for bonded anchors Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Type of anchors, anchor groups and number of anchors ...................................................................... 2 1.2 Concrete member................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Type and direction of load ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Safety class ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Terminology and Symbols ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Indices .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Actions and resistances ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Concrete and steel ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Characteristic values of anchors (see Figure 2.1) .................................................................................. 5 3 Design and safety concept ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Ultimate limit state .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Design resistance............................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Partial safety factors for resistances .................................................................................................. 6 3.2.2.1 Concrete cone failure, splitting failure, combined pullout and concrete cone failure, pry .... out failure and edge failure ................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.2.2 Steel failure................................................................................................................................ 7 3.3 Serviceability limit state .......................................................................................................................... 7 4 Static analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Noncracked and cracked concrete ....................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Loads acting on anchors ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.2.1 Tension loads ..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.2 Shear loads ...................................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.2.1 Distribution of shear loads ....................................................................................................... 10 4.2.2.2 Determination of shear loads .................................................................................................. 11 4.2.2.3 Shear loads without lever arm ................................................................................................. 13 4.2.2.4 Shear loads with lever arm ...................................................................................................... 14 5 Ultimate limit state .......................................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Design method ..................................................................................................................................... 15 5.2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................ 15 5.2.2 Resistance to tension loads ............................................................................................................. 15 5.2.2.1 Required proofs ....................................................................................................................... 15 5.2.2.2 Steel failure.............................................................................................................................. 15 5.2.2.3 Combined pull out and concrete cone failure ......................................................................... 15 5.2.2.4 Concrete cone failure .............................................................................................................. 19 5.2.2.5 Splitting failure due to anchor installation ................................................................................ 22 5.2.2.6 Splitting failure due to loading ................................................................................................. 22 5.2.3 Resistance to shear loads ................................................................................................................ 23 5.2.3.1 Required proofs ....................................................................................................................... 23 5.2.3.2 Steel failure.............................................................................................................................. 24 5.2.3.3 Concrete pryout failure ........................................................................................................... 25 5.2.3.4 Concrete edge failure .............................................................................................................. 27 5.2.4 Resistance to combined tension and shear loads ........................................................................... 33 6 Serviceability limit state .................................................................................................................................. 34 6.1 Displacements ...................................................................................................................................... 34 6.2 Shear load with changing sign.............................................................................................................. 34 7 Additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of concrete member .......................................... 34 7.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 34 7.2 Shear resistance of concrete member ................................................................................................. 35 7.3 Resistance to splitting forces................................................................................................................ 36
74533.07
2
Introduction The design method for bonded anchors given in the relevant ETA’s is based on the experience of a bond 2 resistance for anchors in the range up to 15 N/mm and an intended embedment depth of 8 to 12 anchor diameter. In the meantime anchors are on the market with significant higher bond resistance. Furthermore the advantage of bonded anchors, to be installed with varying embedment, needs a modified design concept. This concept is given in this Technical Report. It covers embedment of min hef to 20 d. The minimum embedment depth is given in the ETA, it should be not less than 4d and 40mm. Restriction of the embedment depth may be given in the ETA. Also the assessment and some tests in Part 5 need modifications, because it may be difficult to develop the characteristic bond resistance. Following the concept of Part 5 predominantly steel failure and concrete cone failure may be observed for shallow and deep embedment. These results are of minor interest. The design method given in this Technical Report is based on Annex C with necessary modifications. It is valid for anchors with European Technical Approval (ETA) according to the new approach with characteristic bond resistance (Rk) and it is based on the assumption that the required tests for assessing the admissible service conditions given in Part 1 and Part 5 with modifications according to this Technical Report have been carried out. The use of other design methods will require reconsideration of the necessary tests. The ETA’s for anchors give the characteristic values only of the different approved anchors. The design of the anchorages e.g. arrangement of anchors in a group of anchors, effect of edges or corners of the concrete member on the characteristic resistance shall be carried out according to the design methods described in Chapter 3 to 5 taking account of the corresponding characteristic values of the anchors. Chapter 7 gives additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of the concrete. The design method is valid for all types of bonded anchors except undercut bonded anchors, torque controlled bonded anchors or post installed rebar connections. If values for the characteristic resistance, spacing, edge distances and partial safety factors differ between the design methods and the ETA, the value given in the ETA governs. In the absence of national regulations the partial safety factors given in the following may be used. 1 1.1 Scope Type of anchors, anchor groups and number of anchors
The design method applies to the design of bonded anchors (according to Part 1 and 5) in concrete using approved anchors which fulfil the requirements of this Guideline. The characteristic values of these anchors are given in the relevant ETA. The design method is valid for single anchors and anchor groups. In case of an anchor group the loads are applied to the individual anchors of the group by means of a rigid fixture. In an anchor group only anchors of the same type, size and length should be used. The design method covers single anchors and anchor groups according to Figure 1.1 and 1.2. Other anchor arrangements e.g. in a triangular or circular pattern are also allowed; however, the provisions of this design method should be applied with engineering judgement. In General this design method is valid only if the diameter df of the clearance hole in the fixture is not larger than the value according to Table 4.1. Exceptions: For fastenings loaded in tension only a larger diameter of the clearance hole is acceptable if a correspondent washer is used. For fastenings loaded in shear or combined tension and shear if the gap between the hole and the fixture is filled with mortar of sufficient compression strength or eliminated by other suitable means.
74533.07
The concrete may be cracked or noncracked. 1. In general for simplification it is assumed that the concrete is cracked. 60 d )) Concrete member The concrete member should be of normal weight concrete of at least strength class C 20/25 and at most strength class C 50/60 according to EN 206 and should be subjected only to predominantly static loads. 60 d )) c1.4 Safety class Anchorages carried out in accordance with these design methods are considered to belong to anchorages.2 shear loading. if anchors are situated close to edges (c < max (10 hef . 60 d )) Figure 1. otherwise it has to be shown that the concrete is noncracked (see 4.1). if anchors are situated far from edges (c max (10 hef .3 Type and direction of load The design methods apply to anchors subjected to static or quasistatic loadings and not to anchors subjected to impact or seismic loadings. 74533. 60 d )) tension loading only. c2 < max (10 hef .2 Anchorages covered by the design methods 1. if anchors are situated close to an edge (c < max (10 hef . the failure of which would cause risk to human life and/or considerable economic consequences.1 Anchorages covered by the design methods all loading directions.3 Figure 1. 1.07 .
Further notations are given in the text. negative: compression force) shear force moment bond strength = characteristic value of actions acting on a single anchor or the fixture of an anchor group respectively (normal load. VSd . torsion moment) design value of actions design value of tensile load (shear load) acting on the most stressed anchor of an anchor group calculated according to 4. MSk . 2.3 fck.07 . bending moment. VRk) FRd (NRd . MT. shear load.4 2 Terminology and Symbols The notations and symbols frequently used in the design methods are given below. VSk . VRd) = = 2. shear force) design value of resistance FSk (NSk .Sk) FSd (NSd .1 S R M k d s c cp p sp u y Indices = = = = = = = = = = = = action resistance material characteristic value design value steel concrete concrete pryout pullout splitting ultimate yield 2.cube fyk fuk As W el Concrete and steel = = = = = characteristic concrete compression strength measured on cubes with a side length of 150 mm (value of concrete strength class according to EN 206) characteristic steel yield strength (nominal value) characteristic steel ultimate tensile strength (nominal value) stressed cross section of steel elastic section modulus calculated from the stressed cross section of steel ( section with diameter d) d 3 32 for a round 74533. MT. MSd .2 characteristic value of resistance of a single anchor or an anchor group respectively (normal force.2 design value of the sum (resultant) of the tensile (shear) loads acting on the tensioned (sheared) anchors of a group calculated according to 4.Sd) = = = N h Sd (V ) h Sd g g N Sd ( VSd ) FRk (NRk .2 F N V M Actions and resistances = = = = = force in general (resulting force) normal force (positive: tension force.
7) edge distance in direction 2.07 .1b and Figure 5. in case of internally threaded sockets outside diameter of socket drill hole diameter thickness of concrete member effective anchorage depth minimum thickness of concrete member spacing of anchors in a group spacing of anchors in a group in direction 1 spacing of anchors in a group in direction 2 spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of pullout failure spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of concrete cone failure spacing for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of splitting failure minimum allowable spacing 74533.N ccr.5 2.4 a a1 a2 b c c1 c2 ccr.sp smin Characteristic values of anchors (see Figure 2.Np scr. direction 2 is perpendicular to direction 1 edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of pullout failure edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of concrete cone failure edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic tensile resistance of a single anchor without spacing and edge effects in case of splitting failure minimum allowable edge distance diameter of anchor bolt or thread diameter.sp cmin d do h hef hmin s s1 s2 scr.N scr.Np ccr. in case of anchorages close to an edge loaded in shear c 1 is the edge distance in direction of the shear load (see Figure 2.1) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors in direction 1 spacing between outer anchors of adjoining groups or between single anchors in direction 2 width of concrete member edge distance edge distance in direction 1.
splitting failure.2. combined pullout and concrete cone failure.2.2 Partial safety factors for resistances In the absence of national regulations the following partial safety factors may be used: 3.2).1 Concrete member.1 Concrete cone failure. anchor spacing and edge distance Design and safety concept General The design of anchorages shall be in accordance with the general rules given in EN 1990. The partial safety factors for actions may be taken from national regulations or in the absence of them according to EN 1990. splitting failure (Msp) and combined pullout and concrete cone failure (Mp) are given in the relevant ETA.2.5 partial safety factor taking account of the installation safety of an anchor system . 3.07 = = = c .6 Figure 2.1 Design resistance The design resistance is calculated according to Equation (3.2) characteristic resistance of a single anchor or an anchor group partial safety factor for material Ultimate limit state 3.1 3 3. pryout failure and edge failure (Mc).1) Sd = value of design action Rd = value of design resistance Actions to be used in design may be obtained from national regulations or in the absence of them from the relevant parts of EN 1991. For anchors to according to current experience the partial safety factor Mc is determined from: Mc c 2 74533.2 = (3.2. Sd ≤ Rd (3. pryout failure and edge failure The partial safety factors for concrete cone failure. 2 partial safety factor for concrete = 1. The design resistance is calculated as follows: Rd = Rk/M Rk = M 3. It shall be shown that the value of the design actions Sd does not exceed the value of the design resistance Rd.
0. In the absence of other guidance the following provisions may be taken.3c) 3. 4 4.3 Serviceability limit state In the serviceability limit state it shall be shown that the displacements occurring under the characteristic actions are not larger than the admissible displacement.4 (3. (4.g.5 or fuk > 800 N/mm fyk/fuk > 0.2.1) is not fulfilled or not checked.0 For the partial safety factors Msp and Mp the value for Mc may be taken.2.7 The partial safety factor 2 is evaluated from the results of the installation safety tests. Tension loading 2 = 1. then cracked concrete is assumed. see Part 5.4 for systems with low but still acceptable installation safety Shear loading 2 = 1.1.3a) Shear loading of the anchor with and without lever arm: Ms = 1.2 for systems with normal installation safety = 1.25 fyk / fuk and fuk < 800 N/mm fyk/fuk < 0. shrinkage of concrete) or extrinsic imposed deformations (e.0 > 1.8 2 (3.g. then R = 3 N/mm should be assumed.2 fyk / fuk > 1.2 Steel failure The partial safety factors Ms for steel failure are given in the relevant ETA. 6.0 for systems with high installation safety = 1.2.1 Static analysis Noncracked and cracked concrete If the condition in Equation (4. The admissible displacement depends on the application in question and should be evaluated by the designer. Noncracked concrete may be assumed in special cases if in each case it is proved that under service conditions the anchor with its entire anchorage depth is located in noncracked concrete.1) is observed: L + R < 0 L R = = stresses in the concrete induced by external loads. For the characteristic displacements see chapter 6. according to EC 2. If no detailed analysis is conducted. including anchors loads stresses in the concrete due to restraint of intrinsic imposed deformations (e. In this check the partial safety factors on actions and on resistances may be assumed to be equal to 1.2.07 .8 2 (3. due to displacement of support or 2 temperature variations).2. For anchors according to current experience the partial safety factors Ms are determined as a function of the type of loading as follows: Tension loading: Ms = 1. 3.3b) Ms = 1.1) 74533. For anchorages subjected to a resultant load FSk < 60 kN noncracked concrete may be assumed if Equation (4.
The modulus of 2 elasticity of concrete is given in EC 2. to enable a more accurate assessment of the anchor group resistance.2. b) The stiffness of all anchors is equal and corresponds to the modulus of elasticity of the steel. 4.8 The stresses L and R are calculated assuming that the concrete is noncracked (state I).1 in the ultimate limit state and according to 3.3 in the serviceability limit state. To design the anchorage the loads acting on each anchor are calculated. If in special cases the anchor plate is not sufficiently stiff.g. for reasons of simplicity the group of tensioned anchors may be resolved into a group rectangular in shape (that means the centre of gravity of the tensioned anchors may be assumed in the centre of the axis in Figure 4. If the tensioned anchors do not form a rectangular pattern. then the flexibility of the anchor plate should be taken into account when calculating loads acting on the anchors. In the case of anchor groups with different levels of tension forces N si acting on the individual anchors of a group the eccentricity eN of the tension force N S of the group may be calculated (see Figure 4. walls) Equation (4. c) In the zone of compression under the fixture the anchors do not contribute to the transmission of normal forces (see Figure 4. As a simplification it may be taken as Ec = 30 000 N/mm . the tension loads acting on each anchor due to loads and bending moments acting on the fixture should be calculated according to the theory of elasticity using the following assumptions: a) The anchor plate does not deform under the design actions. With single anchors normally the loads acting on the anchor are equal to the loads acting on the fixture.1).2 Loads acting on anchors In the static analysis the loads and moments are given which are acting on the fixture. bending and torsion moments acting on the fixture are distributed to tension and shear forces acting on the individual anchors of the group. This distribution shall be calculated according to the theory of elasticity.1b).1c) g 74533. 4.1 Tension loads In general. taking into account partial safety factors for actions according to 3.07 . To ensure the validity of this assumption the anchor plate has to be sufficiently stiff. With anchor groups the loads. For plane concrete members which transmit loads in two directions (e.1) should be fulfilled for both directions. slabs.
9 g Figure 4.07 .1 Example of anchorages subjected to an eccentric tensile load N S 74533.
This can be favourable in case of fastenings close to an edge (see Figure 4.4).2 and 4.2 Shear loads 4.7).10  4.07 .6).3 and 4..2.2.1 Distribution of shear loads The distribution of shear loads depends on the mode of failure: a) Steel failure and concrete pryout failure It is assumed that all anchors of a group take up shear load if the diameter df of clearance hole in the fixture is not larger than the value given in Table 4. Slotted holes in direction of the shear load prevent anchors to take up shear loads.2.2 Examples of load distribution. All anchors take up shear loads acting parallel to the edge.1 (see Figure 4.1 the design method is only valid if the gap between the bolt and the fixture is filled with mortar of sufficient compression strength or eliminated by other suitable means. when all anchors take up shear loads 74533. b) Concrete edge failure Only the most unfavourable anchors take up shear loads if the shear acts perpendicular towards the edge (see Figure 4.1 Diameter of clearance hole in the fixture (mm) 6 7 8 9 10 12 12 14 14 16 16 18 18 20 20 22 22 24 24 26 27 30 30 33 external diameter 1) 2) d or dnom diameter df of clearance hole in the fixture (mm) 1) 2) if bolt bears against the fixture if sleeve bears against the fixture Figure 4. Table 4. If the diameter df of clearance hole in the fixture is larger than given in Table 4.
07 .5 Example for a fastening subjected to an eccentric shear load 4.3 Examples of load distribution.6 and 4.11  Figure 4. when only the most unfavourable anchors take up shear loads Figure 4. Figure 4. 74533. Equilibrium has to be satisfied.2. to enable a more accurate assessment of the anchor group resistance.2.2 Determination of shear loads The determination of shear loads to the fasteners in a group resulting from shear forces and torsion moments acting on the fixture is calculated according to the theory of elasticity assuming equal stiffness for all fasteners of a group.4 Examples of load distribution for a fastening with slotted holes g In the case of anchor groups with different levels of shear forces V si acting on the individual anchors of the group the eccentricity ev of the shear force VS of the group may be calculated (see Figure 4..7. Examples are given in Figs 4.5).
h VSd.6 Determination of shear loads when all anchors take up loads (steel and pryout failure) 74533.h /4 c) Group of four anchors under an inclined shear load Vanchor Vanchor TSd s1 Vanchor s2 Vanchor Vanchor TSd (s1 / 2)2 (s2 / 2)2 Ip 0.h /4 VSd.07 .v VSd VSd.12  VSd VSd / 3 a) Group of three anchors under a shear load VSd / 4 VSd VSd / 4 b) Group of four anchors under a shear load VSd.v /4 VSd..v /4 VSd.5 with: Ip = radial moment of inertia (here: Ip = s1 + s2 ) 2 2 d) Group of four anchors under a torsion moment Figure 4.h /4 VSd.v /4 VSd.v /4 VSd.h /4 VSd.
while the components of the load acting parallel to the edge are – due to reasons of equilibrium – equally distributed to all anchors of the group. 4.2. b) The fixture shall be in contact with the anchor over its entire thickness. 74533.7 Determination of shear loads when only the most unfavourable anchors take up loads (concrete edge failure) In case of concrete edge failure where only the most unfavourable anchors take up load the component of the load acting perpendicular to the edge are taken up by the most unfavourable anchors (anchors close to the edge).3 Shear loads without lever arm Shear loads acting on anchors may be assumed to act without lever arm if both of the following conditions are fulfilled: a) The fixture shall be made of metal and in the area of the anchorage be fixed directly to the concrete either 2 without an intermediate layer or with a levelling layer of mortar (compression strength ≥ 30 N/mm ) with a thickness < d/2.2.07 ..13  VSd VSd Loaded anchor Unloaded anchor Edge a) Group of two anchors loaded by a shear load perpendicular to the edge Load not to be considered VSd VSd/2 b) Group of two anchors loaded parallel to the edge Load to be considered Edge VV = VSd cos V VSd V VV/2 Load not to be considered VH = VSd sin V Load to be considered VH/4 Edge c) Group of four anchors loaded by an inclined shear load Figure 4.
.3) The value M depends on the degree of restraint of the anchor at the side of the fixture of the application in question and shall be judged according to good engineering practice.9a). Full restraint (M = 2. Figure 4.2) (see Figure 4.3) MSd = VSd .9 Fixture without (a) and with (b) restraint 74533.2.8 Definition of lever arm The design moment acting on the anchor is calculated according to Equation (4. No restraint (M = 1.2. If restraint of the anchor is assumed the fixture shall be able to take up the restraint moment. This assumption is always on the safe side.0) shall be assumed if the fixture can rotate freely (see Figure 4.0) may be assumed only if the fixture cannot rotate (see Figure 4.1 or the anchor is clamped to the fixture by nut and washer (see Figure 4.8).2.8) = a3 + e1 with e1 = a3 = a3 = d = (4. M (4.2) distance between shear load and concrete surface 0.3 are not fulfilled the lever arm is calculated according to Equation (4.9b) and the hole clearance in the fixture is smaller than the values given in Table 4.8a) Figure 4.5 d 0 if a washer and a nut is directly clamped to the concrete surface (see Figure 4.4 Shear loads with lever arm If the conditions a) and b) of 4.8b) nominal diameter of the anchor bolt or thread diameter (see Figure 4.07 .2.14  4.
s.s = As fuk [N] NRk. 5.1) it has to be shown that the design value of the action is equal to or smaller than the design value of the resistance. 5. NRk. NRk. Spacing.p = d .2.3 Combined pull out and concrete cone failure The characteristic resistance in case of combined pull out and concrete cone failure.c / Mc N Sd < NRk.p 0 .1 Ultimate limit state General According to Equation (3.1 General It has to be shown that Equation (3.2.s.2. is NRk.N .Np .2 Design method 5.p = N Rk.07 [N/mm ].2a) Rk 74533.4 should be observed.Np . splitting failure.2. 5.sp / Msp N Sd < NRk.s is given in the relevant ETA. (5. edge distance as well as thickness of concrete member should not remain under the given minimum values.Np . NRk. combined pullout and concrete cone failure.N 0 Ap. The spacing between outer anchor of adjoining groups or the distance to single anchors should be a > scr.2 Steel failure The characteristic resistance of an anchor in case of steel failure. re..15  5 5.2. ec. Rk [N] 2 (5.2) for anchors according to current experience are given below: a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor is obtained by: 0 N Rk.s / Ms N Sd < NRk. concrete cone failure.s / Ms h combined pullout and concrete cone failure NSd < NRk.p / Mp g concrete cone failure NSd < NRk. In case of a combined tension and shear loading (oblique loading) the condition of interaction according to 5. concrete edge failure and concrete pryout failure). shear) as well as all failure modes (steel failure. The characteristic values of the anchor to be used for the calculation of the resistance in the ultimate limit state are given in the relevant ETA. hef .Np [N] (5. hef and d [mm] .2 Resistance to tension loads 5.p / Mp N Sd < NRk.2.2.2.2) The different factors of Equation (5.sp / Msp g 5.c / Mc g splitting failure NSd < NRk. g.1 Required proofs single anchor anchor group steel failure NSd < NRk.N .1) is observed for all loading directions (tension.p.2. is .1) Ap.
1). Ap.2b) actual area.2c) and (5. with scr .Np). Figure 5.07 .Np (5.ucr 20 d 7.1 Influence area 0 Ap.5 3 hef 2 [mm] (5.Np Rk ..5 0.N/ Ap. Examples for the calculation of Ap.2d) are valid for both cracked and noncracked concrete. values given for applications in cracked concrete (Rk.2.N of an individual anchor 74533.Np (see Figure 5.N = = scr.2d) Note: The values according to Equations (5.N = influence area of an individual anchor with large spacing and edge distance at the concrete surface. it is limited by overlapping areas of adjoining anchors (s < scr.N .cr ) or for applications in noncracked concrete (Rk. d [mm] c cr .N are given in Figure 5.Np 2 [mm] (5. where: 0 Ap.Np) as well as by edges of the concrete member (c < ccr.16  Rk characteristic bond resistance. depending on the concrete strength class.2c) with Rk.ucr for C20/25 [N/mm ].ucr relevant ETA b) ) in the The geometric effect of spacing and edge distance on the characteristic resistance is taken into account 0 by the value Ap.Np scr.Np scr . idealizing the concrete cone as a pyramid with a base length equal to scr.
Np = 0.. the smallest edge distance.N for different arrangements of anchors in the case of axial tension chors at a corner of concrete member load c) The factor s.Np takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to edges of the concrete member.7 + 0. anchorage in a corner of the concrete member or in a narrow member). shall be inserted in Equation (5. c. For anchorages with several edge distances (e.2 Examples of actual areas Ap.3 . c c cr.g.07 . s.17  a) individual anchor at the edge of concrete member b) group of two anchors at the edge of concrete member c) group of four anchors at a corner of concrete member c) group of four a Figure 5.Np < 1 (5.2e).2e) 74533.
N according to Figures 5. g.cube 1. re.2a) and for the determination of 5.0 may be applied independently of the anchorage depth.Np = ' hef s cr . hef and d [mm] Rk characteristic bond resistance.1).Np hef c max c cr.2f) = spacing.18  d) The factor.Np ' s cr . takes account of the effect of a dense reinforcement re.0 (5. More precise results are obtained if for hef the larger value of h 'ef = c max . 74533.Np = 0. Where there is an eccentricity in two directions.2 leads to results which are on the safe side.Np s s cr . Np n n = d Rk n 1 k h f ef ck .Np (cmax = largest edge distance) (see Figure 5. takes account of the effect of the failure surface for anchor groups g .Np.5 0 g . scr.2b) to (5.2i) hef [mm] If in the area of the anchorage there is a reinforcement with a spacing > 150 mm (any diameter) or with a diameter < 10 mm and a spacing > 100 mm then a shell spalling factor of re.3) the calculation according to Equation 5. hef s cr .2 as well as in Equations (5.07 . hef or c cr .Np < 1 (5.Np = 1.Np h 'ef = s max .5 .2). respectively.Np or ccr.Np takes account of a group effect when different tension loads are acting on the individual anchors of a group. ec. s’cr.Np.2 (for applications in noncracked concrete) e) The factor of ec. ec.Np 1 1.2g) number of anchors in a group Rk and fck.N is inserted in Equation (5. Np A 0 and Ac.Np s 0 g .1 and c.Np = 0.0 (5. depending on the concrete strength class is taken from the relevant ETA: k = 2.3 (for applications in cracked concrete) k = 3. 5 1. f) The shell spalling factor.2.2h) eccentricity of the resulting tensile load acting on the tensioned anchors (see 4.Np are inserted for scr.Np = eN = 1 1 2eN /s cr.Np.2h) the values ' s cr. in case of anchor groups with s1 ≠ s2 the mean value of all spacings s1 and s2 should be taken with 0 g .5 + h ef < 1 200 (5..Np . g) Special cases For anchorages with three or more edges with an edge distance c max < ccr.Np 0 .cube [N/mm2].Np ' c cr.N shall be determined separately for each direction and the product of both factors shall be inserted in Equation (5.
= Ac. Examples for the calculation of Ac.3a) fck.3 Examples of anchorages in concrete members where h’ef. in case of concrete cone failure is: NRk. idealizing the concrete cone as a pyramid with a height equal to h ef and a base length equal to scr.19  Figure 5. where: 0 A0 c.4a).N = scr.07 .s.3) The different factors of Equation (5.N .3) for anchors according to current experience are given below: a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor placed in cracked or noncracked concrete is obtained by: N 0 = k1 Rk. 74533.4b.N . [N] A0 c. It is limited by overlapping concrete cones of adjoining anchors (s < scr.c fck.5 2 [N] (5.1 for applications in noncracked concrete b) The geometric effect of spacing and edge distance on the characteristic resistance is taken into account by the value Ac.N/ A c.cube .N .2.N (5.2.N = area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing and edge distance at the concrete surface.c 0 .c = N Rk.N) as well as by edges of the concrete member (c < ccr.N scr.N (see Figure 5.N .3b) actual area of concrete cone of the anchorage at the concrete surface.N . s cr.4 Concrete cone failure The characteristic resistance of an anchor or a group of anchors.N are given in Figure 5. respectively.Np and ' ' c cr.2 for applications in cracked concrete k1 = 10. re. hef1..Np may be used 5.N with scr.N = 3 hef (5. hef [mm] k1 = 7. ec. A c.cube [N/mm ].N).
07 .4a Idealized concrete cone and area A 0 of concrete cone of an individual anchor c.20  Figure 5.N 74533..
07 ..4b Examples of actual areas Ac.N of the idealized concrete cones for different arrangements of anchors in the case of axial tension load 74533.21  a) individual anchor at the edge of concrete member b) group of two anchors at the edge of concrete member c) group of four anchors at a corner of concrete member Figure 5.
N = 0.07 . the calculation of the characteristic splitting resistance may be omitted if the following two conditions are fulfilled: a reinforcement is present which limits the crack width to wk 0.3a) and for the determination of ' hef s cr .3 the characteristic resistance for concrete cone failure and pullout failure is calculated for cracked concrete.N takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to edges of the concrete member.3 mm. c ccr.N < 1 (5.N.N shall be determined separately for each direction and the product of both factors shall be inserted in Equation (5.N < 1 (5.N or ccr.4 as well as in Equations (5.2.N takes account of a group effect when different tension loads are acting on the individual anchors of a group.3) the calculation according to Equation 5.2. 5. ec. member thickness hmin and reinforcement as given in the relevant ETA.sp and scr.. 74533.3 leads to results which are on the safe side.N hef A 0 and Ac.3).5 s’cr. spacing smin. ec.N.5 + h ef < 1 200 (5.3c) d) The shell spalling factor.N = 0. shall be inserted in Equation (5.sp and the member depth is h > 2 hmin.N 5.N c'cr.2 ccr.3 and c. N . the smallest edge distance. a) It may be assumed that splitting failure will not occur. f) Special cases For anchorages with three or more edges with an edge distance c max < ccr. (5.N = 0. For anchorages with several edge distances (e.7 + 0.3d) hef [mm] If in the area of the anchorage there is a reinforcement with a spacing > 150 mm (any diameter) or with a diameter < 10 mm and a spacing > 100 mm then a shell spalling factor of re. More precise results are obtained if for hef the larger value of h 'ef = cmax ccr .N (cmax = largest edge distance) (see Figure 5.3e) the values ' s 'cr.g. respectively. takes account of the effect of a reinforcement re.2. taking into account the splitting forces according to 7. 5. e) The factor of ec.6 Splitting failure due to loading For splitting failure due to loading the values ccr.N according to Figures 5.sp shall be taken from the ETA as a function of the embedment depth.3c) and (5. hef or h 'ef = s max s cr .3b). anchorage in a corner of the concrete member or in a narrow member). hef is inserted in Equation (5. c.3c). b) With anchors suitable for use in cracked concrete. re.1). N = 3 h 'ef s cr .N are inserted for scr. if the edge distance in all directions is c > 1.0 may be applied independently of the anchorage depth.22  c) The factor s. Where there is an eccentricity in two directions.5 Splitting failure due to anchor installation Splitting failure is avoided during anchor installation by complying with minimum values for edge distance c min.2.2.3e) eccentricity of the resulting tensile load acting on the tensioned anchors (see 4.N = eN = 1 1 2eN / scr. s. N .3 .N = 1.
sp then a longitudinal reinforcement should be provided along the edge of the member.2. in Equations (5. ec. If the edge distance of an anchor is smaller than the value c cr. re.4b) the actual value hef is used in the special case situation. A c. h.s / Ms V Sd < VRk.N should be replaced by ccr.N and scr. The modified value of h’ef is inserted in Equation (5.2. Ac0. (5.sp.c / Mc V Sd < VRk.4b).s / Ms h steel failure.23  If the conditions a) or b) are fulfilled the calculation of the characteristic splitting resistance may be omitted.N.07 .2.4f) also applies for splitting 0 failure due to loading. shear load with lever arm VSd < VRk. h.N .3. In all other cases the characteristic resistance of a single anchor or an anchor group in case of splitting failure should be calculated according to Equation (5.4 b).3e) the values for s’cr. re. on the splitting resistance for anchors according to current experience 5.N according to Equations (5.cp / Mc V Sd < VRk.2.3b).sp 0 .N.N and Ac. however the values ccr. shear load without lever arm VSd < VRk.N.N as defined in Rk.3c) and (5. h = h min with 2/3 (5.N .4a) 1 h .sp A0 c.s / Ms h concrete pryout failure concrete edge failure VSd < VRk.N according to Figures 5.cp / Mc VSd < VRk. In Equation (5. Furthermore.c = factor to account for the influence of the actual member depth. ec.3a) and for the determination of A c..4.N .sp = N Rk.3 and 5.2.N or ccr.2.N .4) N 0 .s / Ms V Sd < VRk.sp 2 hef h min 2 3 (5.sp and c’cr. respectively.3 Resistance to shear loads 5.c with h.N..N [N] (5.4) NRk.3e) and Ac.c / Mc g g 74533.3a) to (5. s. The special case for anchorages with three or more edges as specified in 5.sp and scr.sp are inserted for scr. 5.s.1 Required proofs single anchor anchor group steel failure.
2.5).3.s is taken from the relevant ETA. if the anchor is made of steel with a rather low ductility (rupture elongation A5 < 8%) 74533.s is given in the relevant ETA. In case of current experience it is given by Equation (5.07 . [N] (5.5) In case of anchor groups.s = 0.24  5. VRk.2 Steel failure a) Shear load without lever arm The characteristic resistance of an anchor in case of steel failure.8. VRk.5 ·As · fuk VRk. the characteristic shear resistance given in the relevant ETA is multiplied with a factor 0..
07 .7) and (5.5 Concrete pryout failure on the side opposite to load direction Verification of pryout failure for the most unfavourable anchor 74533.7a) where k = factor to be taken from the relevant ETA NRk.s / Ms [Nm] (5. the lowest value of (5.7a).25  b) Shear load with lever arm The characteristic resistance of an anchor.s M 0 for anchors according to current experience is obtained from Equation (5.6b).2.p (5.cp = k .7b) (5.5).s 5. For anchors according to current experience failing under tension load by concrete cone failure the following values are on the safe side k = 1 k = 2 hef < 60mm hef > 60mm (5.4 determined for single anchors or all anchors of a group loaded in shear.7) and (5. is given by Equation (5. VRk.s [Nm] (5.2) M 0 (1 . VRk. The corresponding characteristic resistance VRk. Rk.7a) is decisive.6a) NRk.cp may be calculated from Equation (5.2 ·Wel · fuk Rk. Rk.s lever arm according to Equation (4.3 and 5.2. VRk.3. NRk.2.3 Concrete pryout failure Anchorages with short stiff anchors can fail by a concrete pryout failure at the side opposite to load direction (see Figure 5.6).7) VRk.4 [N] (5.s = = = = = see 4.2.s NRk.c according to 5.7c) Figure 5. NRk.NSd/NRd.p and NRk.2.6) where M MRk.s) Rk.2.s .s The characteristic bending resistance The value of M 0 shall be taken from the relevant ETA.cp = k . Ms to be taken from the relevant ETA characteristic bending resistance of an individual anchor M 0 Rk.s NRd.c (5.s.2..s = M M Rk. .6b) M 0 = 1.
07 . 5. When calculating the resistance of the most unfavourable anchor the influences of both.5a Group of anchors loaded by a torsion moment.5a demonstrates this for a group of two anchors loaded by a torsion moment.26  In cases where the group is loaded by shear loads and/or external torsion moments. the direction of the individual shear loads may alter. shear loads acting on the individual anchors of the group alter their directions In cases where the horizontal or vertical components of the shear loads on the anchors alter their direction within a group the verification of pryout failure for the entire group is substituted by the verification of pryout failure for the most unfavourable anchor of the group. Fig. It is selfexplanatory that Equation (5.. edge distances as well as anchor spacing should be considered.7) and (5. The shear loads acting on the individual anchors neutralise each other and the shear load acting on the entire group is VSd = 0. Examples for the calculation of Ac.N are given in Fig.5b. 74533. V1 = T / s V2 = T / s T s Figure 5. 5.7a) are not suitable for this application.
c = 0 VRk.8) for anchors according to current experience are given below: a) The initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor placed in cracked or noncracked concrete and loaded perpendicular to the edge corresponds to: 0 VRk .V . The characteristic resistance for an anchor or an anchor group in the case of concrete edge failure corresponds to: VRk. c k1 d hef 1 f ck .2.8b) .V ec.N of the idealised concrete cones 5.7 for applications in cracked concrete k1 = 2.c .V Ac0.07 0. .V re. Ac .V .27  Figure 5. [N] (5.3.5 (5.4 Concrete edge failure Concrete edge failure need not to be verified for groups with not more than 4 anchors when the edge distance in all directions is c > 10 hef and c > 60 d. fck. cube c1 . c1 [mm].cube [N/mm2] with k1 = 1. s.4 for applications in noncracked concrete h 0. .8a) d..8) The different factors of Equation (5.1 ef c 1 74533.V .V h.5b Examples for the calculation of the area Ac.5 [N] (5. hef. .
Examples for calculation of Ac.V . Figure 5.7.V are given in Figure 5.V of concrete cone for a single anchor 74533.V/ A c.07 .5 c1 and 3 c1 (Figure 5.5 c1) and by member thickness (h < 1.V = area of concrete cone of an individual anchor at the lateral concrete surface not affected by edges parallel to the assumed loading direction.V = = For the calculation of A 0 and Ac. member thickness or adjacent anchors.V the concrete member. assuming the shape of the fracture area as a half pyramid with a height equal to c1 and a baselength of 1. It is limited by the overlapping concrete cones of adjoining anchors (s < 3 c1) as well as by edges parallel to the assumed loading direction (c2 < 1.5 c1 (5..8d) actual area of concrete cone of anchorage at the lateral concrete surface.V it is assumed that the shear loads are applied perpendicular to the edge of c.6 Idealized concrete cone and area A 0 c.8c) b) The geometrical effect of spacing as well as of further edge distances and the effect of thickness of the concrete member on the characteristic load is taken into account by the ratio Ac. Ac.1 c 1 0. 2 4.2 (5. where: 0 A0 c.28  d 0.5 c1).6).
.7 Examples of actual areas of the idealized concrete cones for different anchor arrangements under shear loading 74533.07 .29  Figure 5.
see Figure 4. ) > 1 h (5.0 (5.V . VSd or both are given in Fig.7 + 0.V = ( 15c1 1/2 .V/ A c.g.V 1 sin V (cos V ) 2. VSd. 74533.07 .3 . s. For anchorages with two edges parallel to the assumed direction of loading (e.9.8g) is limited to 90°.5 c1 0 (5. .5 2 2 1. The component acting away from the edge may be neglected for the proof of concrete edge failure. h.8 and Fig. Examples of anchor groups loaded by MTd . in a narrow concrete member) the smaller edge distance shall be inserted in Equation (5.8e) d) The factor h.V takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to further edges of the concrete member on the shear resistance.8e). In case of αV > 90° it is assumed that only the component of the shear load parallel to the edge is acting on the anchor.5.7c). and the direction perpendicular to the free edge of the concrete member (v ≤ 90°.8g) The maximum value v to be inserted in equation (5.30  c) The factor s. c2 < 1 1.V = 0.8f) e) The factor V takes account of the angle V between the load applied. 5..V takes account of the fact that the shear resistance does not decrease proportionally to the member thickness as assumed by the ratio Ac.
because directed away from the edge co m po ne nt s b) group of anchors at an edge loaded by VSd with an angle 90 < αV < 180° is dir ec te d to action w ar ds th e load on each ed Component neglected..8 Examples of anchor groups at the edge loaded by a shear force or a torsion moment 74533. because anchor ge directed away from the edge αV load on anchor group for calculation eV load on anchor group for calculation c) group of anchors at the edge loaded by a torsion moment MTd Figure 5. components directed away from the edge a) group of anchors at an edge loaded by VSd with an angle αV = 180° action load on each anchor components neglected.31  no proof for concrete edge failure needed.07 .
.9 Examples of anchors groups at the edge loaded by a shear force and a torsion moment 74533.32  action load on each anchor neglected because sum of components is directed away from the edge load on anchor group VSd load on anchor group for calculation a) eV shear component due to torsion moment larger than component of shear force action load on each anchor Considered because sum of components is directed towards the edge load on anchor group VSd load on anchor group for calculation eV b) shear component due to torsion moment smaller than component of shear force Figure 5.07 .
Special cases For anchorages in a narrow.8fh) as well as in the determination of the areas A 0 and Ac.2.max = greatest of the two edge distances parallel to the direction of loading) and h < 1.07 . re.11) shall be satisfied: N < 1 V < 1 N + V < 1.2.5 c1 (see Figure 5.4 Resistance to combined tension and shear loads For combined tension and shear loads the following Equations (see Figure 5.1).9b) (5. the resistances for both edges shall be calculated and the smallest value is decisive. narrow member where the value c’1 may be used 5.9) the largest value of N and V for the different failure modes shall be taken (see 5.V according to Figures 5.10 Example of an anchorage in a thin.V c’1.7 the edge distance c1 is replaced by the value of c.2. ec.8a) to (5. c’1 being the greatest of the values c2max/1. anchorage in noncracked concrete and anchorage in cracked concrete without edge reinforcement anchorage in cracked concrete with straight edge reinforcement (> Ø12 mm) g) The factor re.V takes account of the effect of the type of reinforcement used in cracked concrete.9c) 74533.8h) eccentricity of the resulting shear load acting on the anchors (see 4.4 1 1 2eV / ( 3c1 ) < 1 (5.0 = 1.V re.2)..V re.3.V takes account of a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anchors of a group.max < 1.8) leads to results which are on the safe side.1 and 5.10) the calculation according to Equation (5.2 = 1.5 and h/1. In Equation (5.2. (5.V eV = = = 1.5 c1 (c2.5 or s2max/3 in case of anchor groups Figure 5.2. thin member with c2.6 and 5.2 where N (V) ratio between design action and design resistance for tension (shear) loading. More precise results are achieved if in Equations (5.33  f) The factor ec.V h) i) anchorage in cracked concrete with edge reinforcement and closely spaced stirrups (a < 100 mm) For anchorages placed at a corner.9a) (5.
the normal verifications shall be carried out under due consideration of the actions introduced by the anchors. V = 2. 6. appropriate measures shall be taken to avoid a fatigue failure of the anchor steel (e.07 .1 see Equations (5. for this purpose. In case of a combined tension and shear load.9) if NRd and VRd are governed by steel failure for all other failure modes (5.. due to a sufficiently high permanent prestressing force)).g. facade elements).2 Shear load with changing sign If the shear loads acting on the anchor change their sign several times.min in the 2 serviceability limit state caused by temperature variations should be limited to 100 N/mm .0 = 1. The transmission of the anchor loads to the supports of the concrete member shall be shown for the ultimate limit state and the serviceability limit state. It may be assumed that the displacements are a linear function of the applied load. the shear load should be transferred by friction between the fixture and the concrete (e. 74533. Shear loads with changing sign can occur due to temperature variations in the fastened member (e.34  Figure 5.9a) to (5. 7 7. More accurate results are obtained by Equation (5.10) Serviceability limit state Displacements The characteristic displacement of the anchor under defined tension and shear loads shall be taken from the ETA.2 and 7.g. the displacements for the tension and shear component of the resultant load should be geometrically added.3 should be taken into account. For these verifications the additional provisions given in 7.5 6 6. In case of shear loads the influence of the hole clearance in the fixture on the expected displacement of the whole anchorage shall be taken into account.9c) yield conservative results. Equations (5.1 Additional proofs for ensuring the characteristic resistance of concrete member General The proof of the local transmission of the anchor loads into the concrete member is delivered by using the design methods described in this document. either these members are anchored such that no significant shear loads due to the restraint of deformations imposed to the fastened element will occur in the anchor or in shear loading with lever arm (standoff installation) the bending stresses in the most stressed anchor = max .10) (N) + (V) < 1 with: N.11 Interaction diagram for combined tension and shear loads In general.g. Therefore.
3) a > 200 .4 VRd1 (7.1.07 . NSk.35  If the edge distance of an anchor is smaller than the characteristic edge distance ccr.1) with: VRd1 = shear resistance according Eurocode No. The active width over which the shear force is transmitted should be calculated according to the theory of elasticity. NSk. then either the embedment depth of the anchors should be hef > 0.8 VRd1 (7.N. Otherwise only the loads of suspended 2 ceilings or similar constructions with a load up to 1. then a longitudinal reinforcement of at least 6 shall be provided at the edge of the member in the area of the anchorage depth. 74533. if one of the following conditions is met a) The shear force VSd at the support caused by the design actions including the anchor loads is VSd < 0.2) b) Under the characteristic actions.a = 0. Its distance from an individual anchor or the outermost anchors of a group should be smaller than hef If under the characteristic actions. 2 [1] When calculating VSd. which encloses the tension reinforcement and is anchored at the opposite side of the concrete member. the resultant tension force. NSk [kN] (7.3) c) The anchor loads are taken up by a hanger reinforcement. the shear forces VSd. N Sk a [mm]. In case of slabs and beams made out of prefabricated units and added castinplace concrete.. the anchors should be embedded with hef in the added concrete. The necessary checks for ensuring the required shear resistance of the concrete member are summarized in Table 7. the resultant tension force. of the tensioned fasteners is NSk < 30 kN and the spacing. 7. a.1) may be neglected.8 h or a hanger reinforcement according to paragraph c) above should be provided.a the anchor loads shall be assumed as point loads with a width of load application t1 = st1 + 2 hef and t2 = st2 + 2 hef. between the outermost anchors of adjacent groups or between the outer anchors of a group and individual anchors satisfies Equation (7.2 Shear resistance of concrete member In general. of the tensioned fasteners is NSk > 60 kN. anchor loads may be transmitted into the prefabricated concrete only if the precast concrete is connected with the castinplace concrete by a shear reinforcement. If this shear reinforcement between precast and castinplace concrete is not present. with st1 (st2) spacing between the outer anchors of a group in direction 1 (2).a caused by anchor loads should not exceed the value VSd. Equation (7.0 kN/m may be anchored in the precast concrete.
In addition. 7. Spacing between single anchors and groups of anchors a > scr.k and the characteristic tension load NSk may be taken as FSp.k = 0. b) The tension component NSk of the characteristic loads acting on the anchorage (single anchor or group of anchors) is smaller than 10 kN.N and a > 200 NSk [kN] < 60 Proof of calculated shear force resulting from anchor loads not required < 30 not required N Sk required: VSd > 0.N .07 . This may be neglected if one of the following conditions is met: a) The load transfer area is in the compression zone of the concrete member. As a first indication for anchors according to current experience the ratio between splitting force F Sp..4 VRd1 or hanger reinforcement or hef > 0. If the characteristic tension load acting on the anchorage is NSk > 30 kN and the anchors are located in the tension zone of the concrete member the splitting forces shall be taken up by reinforcement.1 Necessary checks for ensuring the required shear resistance of concrete member Calculated value of shear force of the concrete member under due consideration of the anchor loads VSd < 0. the splitting forces caused by anchors should be taken into account in the design of the concrete member.a < 0.8 VRd1 < 60 a > scr.8 h > 60 not required.5 NSk for bonded anchors. c) The tension component NSk is not greater than 30 kN. for fastenings in slabs and walls a concentrated reinforcement in both directions is present in the region of the anchorage.3 Resistance to splitting forces In general.36  Table 7. 74533. The area of the transverse reinforcement should be at least 60 % of the longitudinal reinforcement required for the actions due to anchor loads.N a > scr.8 h .8 VRd1 . VSd. but hanger reinforcement or hef > 0.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?