Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993

Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

2 in 3 in Sacramento Say Arena Is Important to City's Future; Public-Private Partnership Supported: 66% of city of Sacramento adults say it is important (including 40% who say it is "very important") for the city of Sacramento to have an entertainment and sports facility, according to a SurveyUSA poll conducted for Think BIG. This is against a backdrop of findings that by 9:1, residents say the city could be doing more to plan for long-term economic growth. When told that a public-private partnership might create jobs and result in new economic activity, a majority support a public-private partnership as one possible way to fund a new arena. Residents support a plan to charge a fee to ticket buyers, as one way to help pay for a new arena. Residents support the exploration of possibly leasing some city-owned parking garages to private groups, as one way to generate public funding. Residents would then support a plan to charge a fee to non city residents who park in city-owned parking garages during arena events. Cell phone and home phone respondents included in this research: 500 city of Sacramento adults were interviewed by SurveyUSA 02/17/12 through 02/21/12. This research was conducted using blended sample, mixed mode. Respondents reachable on a home telephone were interviewed on their home telephone in the recorded voice of a professional announcer. Respondents not reachable on a home telephone were shown a questionnaire on their smartphone, tablet, laptop or other electronic device.

1

When you vote to elect city of Sacramento officials this year, which one issue is most important? Creating jobs? Improving education? Or reducing crime? Gender Male 53% 26% 17% 4% 100% 48% Female 18-34 45% 31% 18% 5% 100% 52% 51% 31% 12% 6% 100% 41% 46% 32% 17% 6% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 51% 23% 24% 2% 100% 21% 65+ 44% 28% 24% 3% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 49% 31% 14% 6% 100% 63% 50+ 48% 25% 24% 3% 100% 37% White 48% 28% 20% 4% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 49% 36% 7% 7% 100% 13% 45% 38% 15% 3% 100% 14% 56% 18% 17% 8% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 57% 20% 12% 11% 100% 17% 47% 31% 19% 4% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Creating Jobs Improving Education Reducing Crime Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 49% 29% 17% 5% 100% 100%

2

Does the city of Sacramento do enough to plan for long-term economic development? Or could the city do more? Gender Male 12% 79% 9% 100% 48% Female 18-34 6% 86% 8% 100% 52% 7% 86% 7% 100% 41% 7% 84% 9% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 10% 81% 9% 100% 21% 65+ 16% 74% 10% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 7% 85% 8% 100% 63% 50+ 13% 78% 10% 100% 37% White 10% 82% 8% 100% 58% 2% 89% 9% 100% 13% Race Black Hispani Other 8% 82% 10% 100% 14% 13% 79% 8% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 12% 79% 9% 100% 17% 9% 83% 8% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-3.4% Does Enough Could Do More Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 9% 83% 8% 100% 100%

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 1

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

3
Very

How important to Sacramento's future ... is an entertainment and sports facility capable of attracting concerts, professional sports, children's shows, religious gatherings and major conventions? Very important? Somewhat important? Not very important? Or not at all important? All 40% 26% 17% 15% 1% 100% 100% Gender Male 46% 19% 12% 21% 1% 100% 48% Female 18-34 36% 33% 21% 9% 1% 100% 52% 42% 28% 13% 15% 2% 100% 41% 43% 26% 16% 14% 1% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 37% 24% 22% 16% 1% 100% 21% 65+ 38% 26% 20% 16% 0% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 42% 27% 14% 15% 2% 100% 63% 50+ 37% 25% 21% 16% 0% 100% 37% White 40% 27% 16% 16% 1% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 59% 25% 8% 4% 4% 100% 13% 38% 19% 23% 19% 1% 100% 14% 27% 34% 20% 18% 0% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 48% 37% 10% 5% 0% 100% 17% 39% 24% 18% 17% 1% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Somewhat Not Very Not At All Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

4

The Sacramento Kings basketball team may re-locate to Seattle or Anaheim. Do you want city officials to fight to keep the Kings in Sacramento? Do you want city officials to let the Kings go? Or does it not matter to you? All 48% 26% 26% 100% 100% Gender Male 52% 28% 20% 100% 48% Female 18-34 44% 25% 31% 100% 52% 51% 27% 22% 100% 41% 50% 20% 30% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 43% 30% 27% 100% 21% 65+ 44% 28% 28% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 51% 24% 25% 100% 63% 50+ 43% 29% 27% 100% 37% White 47% 27% 26% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 66% 12% 22% 100% 13% 39% 28% 33% 100% 14% 46% 34% 20% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 61% 20% 18% 100% 17% 45% 28% 27% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Fight To Keep The Kings Let The Kings Go Does Not Matter To You Total Composition of Adults

5

One way to pay for a new arena in Sacramento is to develop a public-sector, private-sector partnership. This partnership might create 4,000 jobs and may result in $7 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years. As one way to help pay for a new Sacramento arena, do you support? ... Or oppose? ... a public-sector, private-sector partnership? All 52% 30% 18% 100% 100% Gender Male 58% 28% 14% 100% 48% Female 18-34 46% 32% 22% 100% 52% 50% 26% 25% 100% 41% 61% 24% 15% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 47% 41% 12% 100% 21% 65+ 50% 36% 14% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 54% 25% 21% 100% 63% 50+ 48% 39% 13% 100% 37% White 51% 31% 18% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 66% 16% 18% 100% 13% 49% 30% 22% 100% 14% 45% 40% 16% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 57% 15% 28% 100% 17% 51% 33% 16% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 2

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

6

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership included private money from the Sacramento Kings and other investors, and public participation that did not raise taxes and which protected the city's general fund, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 72% 15% 13% 100% 100% Gender Male 72% 18% 10% 100% 48% Female 18-34 72% 13% 16% 100% 52% 70% 11% 19% 100% 41% 73% 16% 10% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 74% 19% 8% 100% 21% 65+ 72% 20% 8% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 71% 13% 16% 100% 63% 50+ 73% 20% 8% 100% 37% White 74% 15% 10% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 76% 7% 17% 100% 13% 63% 22% 15% 100% 14% 67% 17% 16% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 81% 5% 14% 100% 17% 70% 18% 13% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

7

Could the city do a better job of operating and maintaining its parking garages? Does the city do as well as anyone could? Or, do you not know enough to say? Gender Male 31% 27% 42% 100% 48% Female 18-34 22% 26% 52% 100% 52% 27% 27% 46% 100% 41% 25% 28% 47% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 34% 28% 38% 100% 21% 65+ 16% 22% 62% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 26% 27% 47% 100% 63% 50+ 26% 25% 48% 100% 37% White 24% 27% 50% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 20% 20% 61% 100% 13% 35% 26% 39% 100% 14% 33% 34% 34% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 26% 35% 39% 100% 17% 26% 25% 49% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% City Could Do a Better Job City Does It As Well As Anyone Do Not Know Total Composition of Adults

All 26% 27% 47% 100% 100%

8

Are you aware? ... Or not aware? ... that the City currently leases several parking garages to private operators? Gender Male 44% 49% 7% 100% 48% Female 18-34 31% 59% 9% 100% 52% 39% 54% 8% 100% 41% 41% 51% 8% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 37% 55% 8% 100% 21% 65+ 28% 62% 10% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 39% 53% 8% 100% 63% 50+ 34% 58% 8% 100% 37% White 40% 53% 8% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 28% 64% 8% 100% 13% 25% 65% 9% 100% 14% 47% 44% 10% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 32% 54% 14% 100% 17% 38% 55% 7% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Aware Not Aware Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 37% 55% 8% 100% 100%

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 3

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

9

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership was able to help pay for a new arena by leasing the city's parking garages, while protecting the jobs of current city employees, limiting rate increases on parking, and avoiding any new taxes, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 64% 22% 14% 100% 100% Gender Male 64% 24% 12% 100% 48% Female 18-34 64% 20% 16% 100% 52% 66% 17% 16% 100% 41% 65% 21% 14% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 60% 28% 12% 100% 21% 65+ 61% 29% 10% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 66% 19% 16% 100% 63% 50+ 61% 28% 11% 100% 37% White 64% 23% 13% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 73% 16% 11% 100% 13% 60% 28% 12% 100% 14% 57% 19% 24% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 71% 12% 17% 100% 17% 62% 24% 13% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.3% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

10

The city has received bids from private groups interested in leasing the city's parking garages. Should the city proceed with competitive bidding to see how much money these private firms will pay to lease city garages? Or should the city not go down this path? All 51% 29% 20% 100% 100% Gender Male 52% 34% 14% 100% 48% Female 18-34 50% 24% 26% 100% 52% 53% 21% 26% 100% 41% 53% 29% 18% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 46% 37% 17% 100% 21% 65+ 47% 37% 15% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 53% 24% 23% 100% 63% 50+ 46% 37% 16% 100% 37% White 53% 30% 17% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 50% 20% 29% 100% 13% 47% 31% 22% 100% 14% 45% 31% 24% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 65% 11% 24% 100% 17% 48% 33% 20% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Proceed With Competitive Bidding Not Go Down This Path Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

11

As one way to help pay for a new arena ... would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a fee of $1 to $3 per ticket, that would be paid only by those who buy tickets to events? Gender Male 70% 18% 12% 100% 48% Female 18-34 62% 21% 17% 100% 52% 65% 16% 19% 100% 41% 69% 23% 8% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 68% 23% 10% 100% 21% 65+ 60% 20% 20% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 66% 19% 15% 100% 63% 50+ 65% 21% 14% 100% 37% White 69% 17% 14% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 58% 23% 19% 100% 13% 55% 27% 18% 100% 14% 68% 21% 11% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 71% 13% 15% 100% 17% 65% 21% 15% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.2% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 66% 20% 15% 100% 100%

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 4

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

12

If the city of Sacramento contributes money from the leasing of garages and the sale of land to help fund the arena, would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a parking fee of $1 to $3 that would be paid only by non-city residents who park at city garages during arena events? All 48% 33% 18% 100% 100% Gender Male 49% 35% 16% 100% 48% Female 18-34 48% 32% 21% 100% 52% 50% 27% 23% 100% 41% 56% 29% 15% 100% 22% Age 35-49 50-64 44% 43% 13% 100% 21% 65+ 38% 43% 19% 100% 15% <50 / 50+ 18-49 52% 28% 20% 100% 63% 50+ 41% 43% 15% 100% 37% White 47% 36% 17% 100% 58% Race Black Hispani Other 54% 29% 17% 100% 13% 56% 24% 19% 100% 14% 41% 37% 22% 100% 14% Cell Phone / Lan Cell Ph Landlin 49% 27% 25% 100% 17% 48% 35% 17% 100% 83%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All Questions Crosstabbed By All Questions

1

When you vote to elect city of Sacramento officials this year, which one issue is most important? Creating jobs? Improving education? Or reducing crime? Most Important 53% 15% 27% 5% 100% 9% On Crime Very 54% 27% 15% 4% 100% 40% 50% 30% 16% 4% 100% 83% 36% 36% 17% 11% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 49% 27% 20% 4% 100% 26% 40% 31% 23% 6% 100% 17% 45% 37% 16% 2% 100% 15% 56% 0% 0% 44% 100% 1% Kings Moving 51% 27% 16% 6% 100% 48% 41% 32% 23% 4% 100% 26% 52% 29% 16% 3% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Creating Jobs Improving Education Reducing Crime Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 49% 29% 17% 5% 100% 100%

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 5

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

1

When you vote to elect city of Sacramento officials this year, which one issue is most important? Creating jobs? Improving education? Or reducing crime? Partnership 53% 27% 14% 6% 100% 52% 45% 32% 20% 2% 100% 30% 42% 30% 21% 7% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 51% 28% 17% 4% 100% 72% 50% 26% 21% 4% 100% 15% 37% 38% 16% 9% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 55% 25% 17% 3% 100% 26% 49% 33% 16% 2% 100% 27% 45% 29% 19% 7% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 43% 37% 17% 3% 100% 37% 54% 25% 17% 4% 100% 55% 38% 19% 26% 18% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 51% 27% 17% 4% 100% 64% 43% 36% 18% 3% 100% 22% 47% 25% 19% 10% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Creating Jobs Improving Education Reducing Crime Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 49% 29% 17% 5% 100% 100%

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

1

When you vote to elect city of Sacramento officials this year, which one issue is most important? Creating jobs? Improving education? Or reducing crime? Bidding 51% 31% 15% 4% 100% 51% 42% 35% 21% 3% 100% 29% 55% 17% 18% 10% 100% 20% 48% 32% 17% 3% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 49% 26% 18% 6% 100% 20% 50% 20% 19% 11% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 51% 30% 17% 2% 100% 48% 44% 31% 19% 6% 100% 33% 52% 22% 15% 10% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Creating Jobs Improving Education Reducing Crime Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 49% 29% 17% 5% 100% 100%

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

2

Does the city of Sacramento do enough to plan for long-term economic development? Or could the city do more? Most Important 10% 84% 6% 100% 49% 5% 85% 10% 100% 29% 14% 78% 8% 100% 17% 9% 72% 19% 100% 5% On Crime Very 9% 83% 8% 100% 40% Importance Of Arena 6% 88% 7% 100% 26% 13% 81% 6% 100% 17% 12% 75% 13% 100% 15% 0% 70% 30% 100% 1% 9% 84% 7% 100% 48% Kings Moving 8% 79% 12% 100% 26% 9% 83% 8% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-3.4% Does Enough Could Do More Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 9% 83% 8% 100% 100%

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 6

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

2

Does the city of Sacramento do enough to plan for long-term economic development? Or could the city do more? Partnership 9% 85% 5% 100% 52% 9% 82% 9% 100% 30% 9% 75% 16% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 9% 83% 8% 100% 72% 14% 77% 9% 100% 15% 4% 85% 11% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 7% 90% 3% 100% 26% 17% 70% 13% 100% 27% 6% 86% 9% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 9% 84% 6% 100% 37% 9% 82% 9% 100% 55% 7% 78% 15% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 9% 85% 6% 100% 64% 11% 75% 14% 100% 22% 7% 84% 9% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-3.4% Does Enough Could Do More Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 9% 83% 8% 100% 100%

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

2

Does the city of Sacramento do enough to plan for long-term economic development? Or could the city do more? Bidding 9% 85% 6% 100% 51% 13% 76% 11% 100% 29% 4% 85% 11% 100% 20% 10% 83% 8% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 8% 84% 8% 100% 20% 8% 81% 12% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 9% 85% 5% 100% 48% 10% 81% 9% 100% 33% 8% 78% 14% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-3.4% Does Enough Could Do More Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 9% 83% 8% 100% 100%

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

3
Very

How important to Sacramento's future ... is an entertainment and sports facility capable of attracting concerts, professional sports, children's shows, religious gatherings and major conventions? Very important? Somewhat important? Not very important? Or not at all important? All 40% 26% 17% 15% 1% 100% 100% Most Important 45% 27% 14% 14% 1% 100% 49% 38% 25% 18% 19% 0% 100% 29% 34% 30% 23% 14% 0% 100% 17% 35% 24% 23% 8% 11% 100% 5% 41% 16% 23% 19% 0% 100% 9% On Crime Very 41% 28% 17% 14% 1% 100% 83% 38% 22% 12% 24% 4% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena Kings Moving 69% 24% 4% 2% 1% 100% 48% 14% 15% 30% 41% 0% 100% 26% 14% 43% 27% 14% 3% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Somewhat Not Very Not At All Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 7

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

3
Very

How important to Sacramento's future ... is an entertainment and sports facility capable of attracting concerts, professional sports, children's shows, religious gatherings and major conventions? Very important? Somewhat important? Not very important? Or not at all important? All 40% 26% 17% 15% 1% 100% 100% Partnership 60% 30% 7% 2% 1% 100% 52% 14% 21% 32% 33% 0% 100% 30% 29% 25% 21% 21% 4% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 49% 27% 14% 8% 1% 100% 72% 19% 11% 26% 45% 0% 100% 15% 18% 41% 20% 18% 3% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 46% 25% 12% 15% 1% 100% 26% 34% 21% 19% 25% 2% 100% 27% 41% 30% 18% 9% 1% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 43% 24% 14% 17% 1% 100% 37% 41% 28% 17% 13% 1% 100% 55% 23% 29% 24% 22% 2% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 52% 27% 14% 6% 1% 100% 64% 18% 20% 23% 39% 0% 100% 22% 22% 34% 21% 20% 3% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Somewhat Not Very Not At All Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

3
Very

How important to Sacramento's future ... is an entertainment and sports facility capable of attracting concerts, professional sports, children's shows, religious gatherings and major conventions? Very important? Somewhat important? Not very important? Or not at all important? All 40% 26% 17% 15% 1% 100% 100% Bidding 57% 25% 12% 5% 1% 100% 51% 15% 23% 25% 36% 0% 100% 29% 36% 34% 16% 10% 3% 100% 20% 47% 26% 14% 12% 1% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 21% 28% 24% 24% 3% 100% 20% 36% 25% 21% 17% 1% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 51% 28% 13% 6% 2% 100% 48% 26% 26% 19% 28% 0% 100% 33% 38% 23% 22% 15% 2% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Somewhat Not Very Not At All Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

4

The Sacramento Kings basketball team may re-locate to Seattle or Anaheim. Do you want city officials to fight to keep the Kings in Sacramento? Do you want city officials to let the Kings go? Or does it not matter to you? All 48% 26% 26% 100% 100% Most Important 50% 22% 28% 100% 49% 45% 29% 26% 100% 29% 43% 34% 23% 100% 17% 61% 23% 16% 100% 5% 50% 24% 26% 100% 9% On Crime Very 82% 9% 9% 100% 40% 49% 25% 26% 100% 83% 37% 39% 24% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 44% 15% 41% 100% 26% 12% 46% 42% 100% 17% 5% 72% 23% 100% 15% 39% 0% 61% 100% 1% Kings Moving -

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Fight To Keep The Kings Let The Kings Go Does Not Matter To You Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 8

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

4

The Sacramento Kings basketball team may re-locate to Seattle or Anaheim. Do you want city officials to fight to keep the Kings in Sacramento? Do you want city officials to let the Kings go? Or does it not matter to you? All 48% 26% 26% 100% 100% Partnership 75% 8% 18% 100% 52% 11% 58% 31% 100% 30% 33% 26% 41% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 59% 17% 24% 100% 72% 11% 64% 25% 100% 15% 31% 33% 36% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 50% 32% 19% 100% 26% 43% 34% 23% 100% 27% 50% 19% 31% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 48% 30% 21% 100% 37% 46% 25% 29% 100% 55% 56% 15% 29% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 62% 15% 24% 100% 64% 16% 58% 26% 100% 22% 35% 29% 36% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Fight To Keep The Kings Let The Kings Go Does Not Matter To You Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

4

The Sacramento Kings basketball team may re-locate to Seattle or Anaheim. Do you want city officials to fight to keep the Kings in Sacramento? Do you want city officials to let the Kings go? Or does it not matter to you? All 48% 26% 26% 100% 100% Bidding 64% 15% 22% 100% 51% 22% 53% 25% 100% 29% 46% 17% 37% 100% 20% 53% 22% 25% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 33% 45% 23% 100% 20% 47% 19% 34% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 61% 16% 23% 100% 48% 29% 45% 26% 100% 33% 47% 21% 33% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Fight To Keep The Kings Let The Kings Go Does Not Matter To You Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

5

One way to pay for a new arena in Sacramento is to develop a public-sector, private-sector partnership. This partnership might create 4,000 jobs and may result in $7 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years. As one way to help pay for a new Sacramento arena, do you support? ... Or oppose? ... a public-sector, private-sector partnership? All 52% 30% 18% 100% 100% Most Important 56% 28% 16% 100% 49% 48% 33% 19% 100% 29% 43% 35% 22% 100% 17% 60% 14% 26% 100% 5% 52% 29% 18% 100% 9% On Crime Very 76% 11% 13% 100% 40% 53% 30% 17% 100% 83% 34% 32% 35% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 59% 23% 17% 100% 26% 20% 57% 23% 100% 17% 7% 67% 26% 100% 15% 39% 0% 61% 100% 1% Kings Moving 81% 7% 12% 100% 48% 15% 67% 18% 100% 26% 35% 36% 29% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 9

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

5

One way to pay for a new arena in Sacramento is to develop a public-sector, private-sector partnership. This partnership might create 4,000 jobs and may result in $7 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years. As one way to help pay for a new Sacramento arena, do you support? ... Or oppose? ... a public-sector, private-sector partnership? All 52% 30% 18% 100% 100% Partnership Partnership Incl Kings 66% 19% 15% 100% 72% 7% 87% 6% 100% 15% 26% 22% 53% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 59% 25% 16% 100% 26% 39% 41% 20% 100% 27% 55% 27% 18% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 51% 35% 14% 100% 37% 53% 29% 18% 100% 55% 46% 16% 38% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 71% 15% 14% 100% 64% 12% 73% 15% 100% 22% 26% 30% 45% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

5

One way to pay for a new arena in Sacramento is to develop a public-sector, private-sector partnership. This partnership might create 4,000 jobs and may result in $7 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years. As one way to help pay for a new Sacramento arena, do you support? ... Or oppose? ... a public-sector, private-sector partnership? All 52% 30% 18% 100% 100% Bidding 71% 16% 13% 100% 51% 26% 61% 12% 100% 29% 39% 22% 39% 100% 20% 60% 24% 15% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 34% 55% 11% 100% 20% 37% 23% 40% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 70% 17% 13% 100% 48% 35% 52% 13% 100% 33% 33% 24% 43% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

6

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership included private money from the Sacramento Kings and other investors, and public participation that did not raise taxes and which protected the city's general fund, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 72% 15% 13% 100% 100% Most Important 75% 16% 10% 100% 49% 69% 14% 17% 100% 29% 70% 18% 12% 100% 17% 63% 13% 24% 100% 5% 70% 24% 6% 100% 9% On Crime Very 87% 7% 6% 100% 40% 72% 14% 13% 100% 83% 67% 16% 17% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 74% 6% 20% 100% 26% 61% 24% 15% 100% 17% 38% 46% 16% 100% 15% 70% 0% 30% 100% 1% Kings Moving 88% 4% 8% 100% 48% 46% 38% 16% 100% 26% 67% 15% 18% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 10

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

6

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership included private money from the Sacramento Kings and other investors, and public participation that did not raise taxes and which protected the city's general fund, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 72% 15% 13% 100% 100% Partnership 91% 2% 6% 100% 52% 46% 44% 9% 100% 30% 58% 5% 37% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings City Management Of Gar 74% 14% 13% 100% 26% 63% 26% 12% 100% 27% 76% 11% 14% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 73% 18% 10% 100% 37% 73% 14% 13% 100% 55% 60% 12% 28% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 91% 4% 5% 100% 64% 35% 54% 11% 100% 22% 42% 8% 50% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

6

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership included private money from the Sacramento Kings and other investors, and public participation that did not raise taxes and which protected the city's general fund, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 72% 15% 13% 100% 100% Bidding 86% 6% 7% 100% 51% 50% 36% 14% 100% 29% 67% 8% 25% 100% 20% 80% 12% 8% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 57% 30% 13% 100% 20% 55% 12% 34% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 84% 8% 8% 100% 48% 57% 31% 11% 100% 33% 66% 5% 28% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

7

Could the city do a better job of operating and maintaining its parking garages? Does the city do as well as anyone could? Or, do you not know enough to say? Most Important 29% 27% 44% 100% 49% 22% 30% 48% 100% 29% 26% 24% 50% 100% 17% 18% 13% 69% 100% 5% 21% 49% 30% 100% 9% On Crime Very 30% 22% 48% 100% 40% 28% 22% 49% 100% 83% 9% 42% 49% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 25% 21% 54% 100% 26% 19% 29% 51% 100% 17% 26% 44% 30% 100% 15% 30% 39% 30% 100% 1% Kings Moving 27% 24% 49% 100% 48% 31% 34% 34% 100% 26% 19% 24% 57% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% City Could Do a Better Job City Does It As Well As Anyone Do Not Know Total Composition of Adults

All 26% 27% 47% 100% 100%

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 11

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

7

Could the city do a better job of operating and maintaining its parking garages? Does the city do as well as anyone could? Or, do you not know enough to say? Partnership 30% 20% 50% 100% 52% 22% 36% 42% 100% 30% 23% 29% 48% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 27% 23% 50% 100% 72% 23% 44% 32% 100% 15% 26% 24% 50% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar Aware Of Leases 39% 30% 31% 100% 37% 19% 25% 56% 100% 55% 17% 21% 62% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 28% 22% 50% 100% 64% 28% 36% 36% 100% 22% 17% 30% 53% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% City Could Do a Better Job City Does It As Well As Anyone Do Not Know Total Composition of Adults

All 26% 27% 47% 100% 100%

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

7

Could the city do a better job of operating and maintaining its parking garages? Does the city do as well as anyone could? Or, do you not know enough to say? Bidding 27% 26% 47% 100% 51% 26% 37% 36% 100% 29% 24% 13% 63% 100% 20% 29% 27% 44% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 26% 31% 42% 100% 20% 12% 19% 69% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 31% 24% 44% 100% 48% 22% 32% 46% 100% 33% 20% 22% 57% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% City Could Do a Better Job City Does It As Well As Anyone Do Not Know Total Composition of Adults

All 26% 27% 47% 100% 100%

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

8

Are you aware? ... Or not aware? ... that the City currently leases several parking garages to private operators? Most Important 33% 61% 6% 100% 49% 48% 47% 5% 100% 29% 36% 53% 12% 100% 17% 20% 50% 30% 100% 5% 38% 56% 6% 100% 9% On Crime Very 39% 56% 5% 100% 40% 38% 54% 8% 100% 83% 28% 58% 15% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 34% 57% 9% 100% 26% 32% 56% 12% 100% 17% 42% 46% 12% 100% 15% 39% 47% 14% 100% 1% Kings Moving 38% 53% 10% 100% 48% 43% 52% 5% 100% 26% 31% 60% 9% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Aware Not Aware Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 37% 55% 8% 100% 100%

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 12

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

8

Are you aware? ... Or not aware? ... that the City currently leases several parking garages to private operators? Partnership 37% 56% 7% 100% 52% 43% 53% 4% 100% 30% 29% 54% 17% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 38% 56% 7% 100% 72% 43% 51% 6% 100% 15% 29% 54% 18% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 55% 39% 5% 100% 26% 42% 52% 6% 100% 27% 25% 65% 11% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases Leasing Partnership 37% 57% 5% 100% 64% 43% 48% 8% 100% 22% 29% 52% 20% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Aware Not Aware Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 37% 55% 8% 100% 100%

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

8

Are you aware? ... Or not aware? ... that the City currently leases several parking garages to private operators? Bidding 43% 53% 5% 100% 51% 42% 52% 6% 100% 29% 17% 63% 20% 100% 20% 39% 56% 6% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 49% 45% 7% 100% 20% 16% 64% 20% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 36% 58% 5% 100% 48% 45% 49% 6% 100% 33% 26% 55% 19% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Aware Not Aware Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 37% 55% 8% 100% 100%

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

9

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership was able to help pay for a new arena by leasing the city's parking garages, while protecting the jobs of current city employees, limiting rate increases on parking, and avoiding any new taxes, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 64% 22% 14% 100% 100% Most Important 67% 19% 13% 100% 49% 61% 28% 12% 100% 29% 62% 23% 15% 100% 17% 57% 14% 28% 100% 5% 61% 28% 11% 100% 9% On Crime Very 82% 10% 8% 100% 40% 66% 20% 14% 100% 83% 49% 37% 15% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 66% 16% 18% 100% 26% 53% 30% 17% 100% 17% 24% 58% 18% 100% 15% 70% 0% 30% 100% 1% Kings Moving 82% 8% 10% 100% 48% 36% 49% 15% 100% 26% 58% 22% 19% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.3% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 13

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

9

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership was able to help pay for a new arena by leasing the city's parking garages, while protecting the jobs of current city employees, limiting rate increases on parking, and avoiding any new taxes, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 64% 22% 14% 100% 100% Partnership 88% 5% 7% 100% 52% 32% 54% 14% 100% 30% 48% 18% 34% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 81% 11% 8% 100% 72% 15% 77% 7% 100% 15% 27% 19% 55% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 67% 24% 9% 100% 26% 54% 30% 16% 100% 27% 68% 17% 16% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 64% 26% 11% 100% 37% 67% 20% 13% 100% 55% 43% 23% 34% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership -

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.3% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

9

If the public-sector, private-sector partnership was able to help pay for a new arena by leasing the city's parking garages, while protecting the jobs of current city employees, limiting rate increases on parking, and avoiding any new taxes, would you support the partnership? Or oppose it? All 64% 22% 14% 100% 100% Bidding 84% 8% 8% 100% 51% 30% 57% 14% 100% 29% 61% 10% 29% 100% 20% 72% 17% 10% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 45% 42% 13% 100% 20% 51% 18% 31% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 83% 13% 4% 100% 48% 42% 41% 17% 100% 33% 54% 11% 36% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.3% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

10

The city has received bids from private groups interested in leasing the city's parking garages. Should the city proceed with competitive bidding to see how much money these private firms will pay to lease city garages? Or should the city not go down this path? All 51% 29% 20% 100% 100% Most Important 53% 25% 23% 100% 49% 54% 34% 12% 100% 29% 44% 35% 21% 100% 17% 39% 18% 43% 100% 5% 50% 40% 10% 100% 9% On Crime Very 71% 11% 18% 100% 40% 52% 27% 21% 100% 83% 35% 38% 27% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 48% 26% 26% 100% 26% 37% 43% 20% 100% 17% 17% 70% 13% 100% 15% 39% 0% 61% 100% 1% Kings Moving 67% 13% 20% 100% 48% 28% 59% 13% 100% 26% 43% 28% 29% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Proceed With Competitive Bidding Not Go Down This Path Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 14

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

10

The city has received bids from private groups interested in leasing the city's parking garages. Should the city proceed with competitive bidding to see how much money these private firms will pay to lease city garages? Or should the city not go down this path? All 51% 29% 20% 100% 100% Partnership 70% 15% 15% 100% 52% 26% 59% 15% 100% 30% 37% 20% 44% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 61% 20% 19% 100% 72% 21% 68% 11% 100% 15% 30% 31% 39% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 53% 29% 18% 100% 26% 49% 41% 10% 100% 27% 51% 22% 27% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 58% 33% 9% 100% 37% 49% 28% 24% 100% 55% 29% 21% 50% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 67% 13% 20% 100% 64% 17% 74% 9% 100% 22% 29% 28% 43% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Proceed With Competitive Bidding Not Go Down This Path Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

10

The city has received bids from private groups interested in leasing the city's parking garages. Should the city proceed with competitive bidding to see how much money these private firms will pay to lease city garages? Or should the city not go down this path? All 51% 29% 20% 100% 100% Bidding 60% 25% 15% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 33% 48% 18% 100% 20% 32% 20% 48% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe 65% 15% 19% 100% 48% 39% 52% 8% 100% 33% 33% 22% 45% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Proceed With Competitive Bidding Not Go Down This Path Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

11

As one way to help pay for a new arena ... would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a fee of $1 to $3 per ticket, that would be paid only by those who buy tickets to events? Most Important 65% 20% 15% 100% 49% 72% 18% 10% 100% 29% 63% 21% 16% 100% 17% 42% 25% 33% 100% 5% 71% 17% 12% 100% 9% On Crime Very 77% 10% 13% 100% 40% 66% 20% 14% 100% 83% 60% 20% 20% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 65% 21% 14% 100% 26% 54% 28% 18% 100% 17% 52% 31% 17% 100% 15% 30% 56% 14% 100% 1% Kings Moving 72% 13% 14% 100% 48% 56% 33% 11% 100% 26% 63% 17% 19% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.2% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 66% 20% 15% 100% 100%

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 15

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

11

As one way to help pay for a new arena ... would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a fee of $1 to $3 per ticket, that would be paid only by those who buy tickets to events? Partnership 76% 13% 11% 100% 52% 53% 36% 11% 100% 30% 56% 12% 32% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 73% 16% 11% 100% 72% 51% 38% 11% 100% 15% 41% 20% 39% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 73% 20% 7% 100% 26% 66% 23% 11% 100% 27% 61% 18% 21% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 68% 26% 6% 100% 37% 67% 16% 17% 100% 55% 48% 16% 36% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 74% 14% 12% 100% 64% 51% 37% 12% 100% 22% 49% 18% 32% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.2% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 66% 20% 15% 100% 100%

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

11

As one way to help pay for a new arena ... would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a fee of $1 to $3 per ticket, that would be paid only by those who buy tickets to events? Bidding 78% 13% 9% 100% 51% 57% 33% 10% 100% 29% 48% 17% 34% 100% 20% Ticket Fee Non-Resident Parking Fe 78% 12% 10% 100% 48% 56% 37% 7% 100% 33% 49% 9% 42% 100% 18%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.2% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

All 66% 20% 15% 100% 100%

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

12

If the city of Sacramento contributes money from the leasing of garages and the sale of land to help fund the arena, would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a parking fee of $1 to $3 that would be paid only by non-city residents who park at city garages during arena events? All 48% 33% 18% 100% 100% Most Important 50% 30% 20% 100% 49% 51% 35% 14% 100% 29% 47% 37% 16% 100% 17% 19% 42% 39% 100% 5% 49% 36% 16% 100% 9% On Crime Very 61% 22% 17% 100% 40% 50% 33% 17% 100% 83% 31% 38% 31% 100% 8% Importance Of Arena 51% 33% 16% 100% 26% 38% 38% 24% 100% 17% 20% 62% 18% 100% 15% 70% 0% 30% 100% 1% Kings Moving 62% 20% 18% 100% 48% 29% 57% 14% 100% 26% 43% 34% 23% 100% 26%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Creatin Improvi Reduci Not Sur Does E Could D Not Sur

Somew Not Ver Not At Not Sur Fight T Let The Does N

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 16

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993
Geography: City of Sacramento Data Collected: 02/17/2012 - 02/21/2012 Release Date: 02/21/2012 Percentages Sponsor: Think BIG ()

12

If the city of Sacramento contributes money from the leasing of garages and the sale of land to help fund the arena, would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a parking fee of $1 to $3 that would be paid only by non-city residents who park at city garages during arena events? All 48% 33% 18% 100% 100% Partnership 66% 23% 12% 100% 52% 28% 58% 15% 100% 30% 33% 23% 44% 100% 18% Partnership Incl Kings 56% 27% 17% 100% 72% 26% 68% 6% 100% 15% 30% 30% 41% 100% 13% City Management Of Gar 58% 28% 14% 100% 26% 45% 40% 15% 100% 27% 45% 32% 22% 100% 47% Aware Of Leases 47% 40% 13% 100% 37% 52% 30% 19% 100% 55% 32% 25% 43% 100% 8% Leasing Partnership 63% 22% 15% 100% 64% 29% 62% 9% 100% 22% 13% 40% 47% 100% 14%

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur City Co City Do Do Not

Aware Not Aw Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

12

If the city of Sacramento contributes money from the leasing of garages and the sale of land to help fund the arena, would you support? ... Or oppose? ... a parking fee of $1 to $3 that would be paid only by non-city residents who park at city garages during arena events? All 48% 33% 18% 100% 100% Bidding 62% 26% 12% 100% 51% 26% 60% 14% 100% 29% 46% 14% 40% 100% 20% 58% 29% 14% 100% 66% Ticket Fee 30% 62% 8% 100% 20% 32% 16% 53% 100% 15% Non-Resident Parking Fe -

500 Adults Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.5% Support Oppose Not Sure Total Composition of Adults

Procee Not Go Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur Support Oppose Not Sur

Statement of Methodology: About the Poll: This poll was conducted by telephone in the voice of a professional announcer. Respondent households were selected at random, using Random Digit Dialed (RDD) sample provided by Survey Sampling, of Fairfield CT. All respondents heard the questions asked identically. The pollster's report includes the geography that was surveyed; the date(s) interviews were conducted, the number of respondents who answered each question and the theoretical margin of sampling error for each question. Where necessary, respondents were weighted using the most recent US Census estimates for age, gender, ethnic origin and region, to align the sample to the population. In theory, one can say with 95% certainty that the results would not vary by more than the stated margin of sampling error, in one direction or the other, had the entire universe of respondents with home telephones been interviewed with complete accuracy. There are other possible sources of error in all surveys that may be more serious than sampling error. These include: the difficulty of interviewing respondents who do not have a home telephone; the refusal by some with home telephones to be interviewed; the order in which questions are asked; the wording of questions; the way and extent to which data are weighted; and the manner in which specialized populations, such as likely voters, are determined. It is difficult to quantify the errors that may result from these and other factors. Research methodology, questionnaire design and fieldwork for this survey were completed by SurveyUSA of Clifton, NJ. This statement conforms to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

© 2012 SurveyUSA - www.surveyusa.com

Results of SurveyUSA Mkt Research Study #18993 - Page 17