from: Hugh J. Cameron hcameron@smss.com to: andremurraynow@gmail.

com date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:59 PM subject: FW: WITHOUT PREJUDICE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dear Mr. Murray

Mr. McGuigan has sent your email (below) to me for response. As he advised you previously, when you first called him, his company agrees to sell you the Property for the sum of $100,000.00 on an "as is" basis, without further adjustments. If you agree to purchase the Property, and have the funds to do so, then please deposit those funds, in trust, with your own lawyer. Please have him or her contact me to arrange to close the transaction. Given the pending resumption of the Appeal hearing, this must be done before noon on Thursday. This can all be accomplished in that time period. If you do not have a lawyer, you need one, as we are not in a position to act for both sides of the transaction. Of course, any such agreement for sale will include a Release, in a form acceptable to our client and the Royal Bank, in favour of both our client AND Royal Bank, with respect to the alleged improper eviction and, also, the immediate withdrawal of your Appeal, without costs to either party. This will allow the sale to you to be completed on terms acceptable to our client. If this is acceptable to you, please confirm this by return email. If it is NOT acceptable to you, then please continue your Appeal. Please note that this response to your offer to our client to buy the Property is on a WITHOUT PREJUDICE basis, meaning, that this agreement, if concluded, is not an admission of liability by anyone, whatsoever, and neither you, nor our client, will disclose these discussions (which you instigated) to the Court at any time. This is not subject to any further negotiation or extension.

Please refer any and all responses to me. Mr. McGuigan will not be responding to any communication to him, except through me. Thank you and regards, Hugh Cameron

----Original Message----From: Andre Murray [mailto:andremurraynow@gmail.com] Sent: November-10-09 7:52 AM To: richard@meccacorporation.com Subject: Follow up on discussion Dear Richard McGuigan I must say I did enjoy or discussion regarding the Auctioned Mortgage sale property on Marshall Street! I do apologize for the delay in a follow up on our discussion. Note as of 23rd of October I was surprised at my Marshall Street Residence in the early am by the sound of a door handle being forcibly removed by a person whom identified himself as a property management professional contracted by Royal Bank Of Canada to enforce the eviction of myself from 29 Marshall Street. There he was standing in front of me, just outside the house with the handle of and for the front door of civic address 31 Marshall Street in his hand. He quickly served me the court order referencing 29 Marshall Street which I pointed out was next door. He did not care about that "minor detail" furthermore stated "I do not care what you say about that you are out of here any way" Please Richard understand that I do not in any way blame you for this. The Royal Bank Of Canada solicitor and a solicitor acting on behalf of a certain 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate hired a Process Server and caused certain Court documents, which are required by the Rules Of Court, to

be served upon the defendant Andre Murray not less Ten days before any trial hearing. The documents where left by the Process Server at the base of a door i never use. Furthermore , that I might obviously appear and Counter Claim was prevented. Why was the hearing being held in Moncton in a separate Jurisdiction highly unusual I am told! The fact is this may have worked in their favor as I was not notified and the trial - hearing went a head EX PARTE the request - a MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO VACATE ANDRE MURRAY from 29 Marshall Street was granted. Moving ahead quickly Richard I just left a APPEAL COURT HEARING regarding this same matter yesterday, where it was revealed that I do in fact have a legal binding tenancy of 29 Marshall Street & 31 Marshall Street. What now!? The hearing had to be Adjourned and will continue later... ( shortage of time for the judge to hear more). As interesting as all this may seem it is exhausting and becoming tedious. I am not enjoying life and my world is literally and physically upside down. I want all this distraction to go away. I am not interested in creating a MAKE WORK PROJECT for a bunch of lawyers....shuffling back and forth between Moncton contrary to Rules of Court #45.02 and ultimately at our expense. Forgive me for sounding skeptical but resolving legal matters quickly could put a lawyer guy out of business. Correct!! I have plans to marry and Marshall Street was going to be my fixer upper project home. The absentee Landlord whom I have never met ( only email and regular mail correspondence ) convinced me to invest in the good old house and promised ownership within four years if I should care to Exercise my Right Of First Refusal Contractual Agreement.

When on the forth year I attempted to Exercise my Right Of First Refusal

Contractual Agreement the Title Holder and my landlord (same person) goes to foreclosure. Thereby possibly expunging my Legal Interest or maybe the landlord has other plans....time will reveal all! The rest of the story we can be the authors of or we can give all our money in your case and all my time in my case to Court Games run by the Lawyers. Please it is obvious what it is that is fair here ......I propose we YOU and I make a out of Court Settlement as we discussed in our earlier chat. May I suggest that I transfer funds into your account in exchange for the Legal transfer of your 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate rights to purchase The Marshall Street Mortgage & Property Title. This will happen quickly I have confirmed the funds are available. I welcome discussion on this matter I thank you kindly for your consideration in this matter. ________________ Sincerely Andre Murray