P. 1
Thebestawan (From Jw)

Thebestawan (From Jw)

|Views: 36|Likes:
Published by Quin Revel

More info:

Published by: Quin Revel on Apr 05, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/16/2013

pdf

text

original

Sections

  • Three Types of Authority:
  • Reputation in context of Apparent Authority
  • Duty of Confidentiality Distinguished from Attorney Client Privilege
  • Use of Client info for Personal Benefit
  • Disclosure of Client Info for Personal Benefit
  • Confidentiality with Multiple Clients
  • Entity Representation and Entity Constituents
  • Disclosure Authorized by Implication
  • EXCEPTIONS TO CONFIDENTIALITY RULE – when it is ok to breach
  • Lawyer Self-Defense
  • Physical and Economic Harm
  • Protecting an Entity Client
  • ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
  • Traditional elements of attorney client privilege:
  • Attorney-Client privilege in connection with entity clients
  • In Confidence
  • Between an Attorney and a Client
  • Relating to Legal Advice
  • Entities and Privilege
  • Crime/Fraud exception
  • JOINT CLIENTS
  • Inadvertent Disclosure
  • Deliberate Disclosure
  • Selective and Partial Waiver
  • Disclosure Within Another Privileged Relationship
  • Common Interest Exception to Waiver = Prisoner’s Dillemma
  • WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE
  • Prepared in Anticipation of Litigation Requirement
  • Civil Malpractice
  • Causation and Damages
  • Limitations and Tolling
  • Duties To Parties Related to Client
  • Misrepresentation
  • DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
  • Advancing Clients Money
  • Alternative Funding Mechanisms (Civil Only)
  • Conflicts Arising from Concurrent Representation
  • Comment 6 to MR 1.7 – “Directly Adverse”
  • Limitation on Counsel’s Ability to Represent Zealously
  • Remedies for Concurrent Conflicts
  • Standing and Interlocutory Appeal
  • Subsequent conflicts of interest
  • Conflicts and Confidences obtained other than through representation
  • Conflicts in Criminal Cases
  • IMPUTATION OF CONFLICTS AND SCREENING
  • Imputation of Knowledge and Screening
  • Imputation from Lawyer to Firm
  • Imputation from Firm to Lawyer
  • Conflicts and the “Common Interest” Exception to Privilege Waiver
  • SCREENING
  • Information Transmitted to Non-Lawyers: Expert Witness Problem
  • Waivers Involving Entities and Entity Constituents
  • Transactions with Clients – GREAT WAY TO GET DISBARRED
  • Relations with Insurers
  • Receiving Evidence
  • Embarrassing or Burdening Others
  • Fiduciary Responsibility to Firm
  • Mobile Lawyers
  • Superior-Subordinate Relations – PAGE 75 OTHER OUTLINE
  • Activities outside the Firm – What is in the Scope and Course of Employment
  • Types of Fees
  • FEE DIVISION
  • Claims Between Attorneys
  • Disciplinary Risks
  • Candor Towards Trubunal
  • Handling Evidence
  • Discovery Evidence

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.

com PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY McGowen – Fall 2009 3 duties – 1) duty of loyalty 2) duty of confidentiality 3) duty of care 5 rules 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) never create a duty you don’t want to create always be prepared to walk away assume everything you do or say will become publicly known never make a client’s problem your own never do as a lawyer anything you find repugnant as a person

Hierarchy in rules exist: MR 3.3 MR 1.6 MR 8.3 DON’T FORGET ABOUT B&P 6068 (e) – Duty of attorney to maintain confidence at every peril to his self or herself Want to know 5 things and diagram 5 things when he presents you with a problem 1) who are the players? The people that are affected by or may be affected by a choice 2) what info each player has 3) what choices each player may make 4) when each player must chose from these choices 5) payoffs

1

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com DUTIES LAWYERS OWE CLIENTS §16 A LAWYER’S DUTIES TO A CLIENT – IN GENERAL

To the extent consent with the lawyer’s other legal duties and subject to the other provisions of this restatement, a lawyer must, in matters within the scope of the representation: (1) proceed in a manner reasonably calculated to advance a client’s lawful objectives, as defined by the client after consultation; (2) act with reasonable competence and diligence (3) comply with obligations concerning the client’s confidences and property, avoid impermissible conflicting interests, deal honestly with the client, and not employ advantages arising from the client-lawyer relationship in a manner adverse to the client; and (4) fulfill valid contractual obligations to the client US v 7108 West Grand Rule: Clients are principals, attorney is agent, under law of agency the principal is bound by his chosen agent’s deeds. Holding client responsible for the lawyer’s deeds ensure that both clients and lawyers take care to comply. If the lawyers neglect protected the client from ill consequences, neglect would become all too common. A litigant chooses his counsel at his peril. Counsel’s disregard for his professional responsibilities can lead to extinction of his client’s claims. Holding: Client is bound by lawyer’s action § 52 THE STANDARD OF CARE

(1) For purposes of liability under §48 and 49, a lawyer who owes a duty of care must exercise the competence and diligence normally exercised by lawyers in similar circumstances

§59

DEFINITION OF “CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT INFORMATION”

Confidential client information consists of information relation to representation of the client, other than information that is generally known. §60 A LAWYER’S DUTY TO SAFEGUARD CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT INFORMATION (1) Except as provided in §61-67, during and after representation of a client: a. The lawyer may not use or disclose confidential client information as defined in §59 if there is a reasonable prospect that doing so will adversely affect a material interest of the client or if the client has instructed the lawyer not to use or disclose such information b. The lawyer must take steps reasonable in the circumstances to protect confidential client information against impermissible use or disclosure by the lawyer’s associates or agents that may adversely affect a material interest of the client or otherwise than as instructed by the client. (2) Except as stated in §62, a lawyer who uses confidential information of a client for the lawyer’s pecuniary gain other than in the practice of law must account to the client for any profits made. Tante v. Herring Rule: When lawyer uses confidential information to detriment of client, breach of fiduciary duty exists. Holding: - Duty of Care: Elements for an action for legal malpractice consist of: Empoyment of an attorney; failure of attorney to exercise ordinary care; damages proximately caused by that failure. Element

2

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com of breach (failure to exercise ordinary care) must be related directly to the duty of the attorney to perform the task for which he was employed Fiduciary Duty: Tante was a fiduciary with regard to the confidential information provided to him by his client and therefore he owed his client the utmost good faith and loyalty. By using information available to him to disadvantage his client, he breached that duty.

-

DIVISION OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN LAWYER AND CLIENT § 26 A LAWYER’S ACTUAL AUTHORITY

A lawyer’s act is considered to be that of a client in proceedings before a tribunal or in dealings with third persons when: (1) the client has expressly or impliedly authorized the act; (2) authority concerning the act is reserved to the lawyer as stated in §23 or (3) the client ratifies the act.

§27

A LAWYER’S APPARENT AUTHORITY

A lawyer’s act is considered to be that of the client in proceedings before a tribunal or in dealings with a third person if the tribunal or third person reasonably assumes that the lawyer is authorized to do the act on the basis of the client’s (and not the lawyer’s) manifestations of such authorization. §28 A LAWYER’S KNOWLEDGE; NOTIFICATION TO A LAWYER; AND STATEMENTS OF A LAWYER (1) Information imparted to a lawyer during and relating to the representation of a client is attributed to the client for the purpose of determining the client’s rights and liabilities in matters in which the lawyer represents the client, unless those rights or liabilities require proof of the client’s personal knowledge or intentions or the lawyer’s legal duties preclude disclosure of the information to the client. (2) Unless applicable law otherwise provides, a third person may give notification to a client, in a matter in which the client is represented by a lawyer, by giving notification to the client’s lawyer, unless the third person knows of circumstances reasonably indicating that the lawyer’s authority to receive notification has been abrogated (3) A lawyer’s unprivileged statement is admissible in evidence against a client as if it were the client’s statement if either: a. The client authorized the lawyer to make a statement concerning the subject, or b. The statement concerns a matter within the scope of the representation and was made by the lawyer during it.

§29

A LAWYER’S ACT OF ADVICE AS MITIGATING OR AVOIDING A CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY (1) When a client’s intent or mental state is in issue, a tribunal may consider otherwise admissible evidence of a lawyer’s advice to the client. (2) In deciding whether to impose a sanction on a person or to relieve a person from a criminal or civil ruling, default or judgment, a tribunal may consider otherwise admissible evidence to prove or disprove that the lawyer who represented the person did so inadequately or contrary to the client’s instructions.

§30

A LAWYER’S LIABILITY TO A THIRD PERSON FOR CONDUCT ON BEHALF OF A CLIENT

3

judges will try to find a way to say you have authority in an effort to make things more efficient a. Implied Authority: Implied based on manifestations from client about what he wants you to do a. this implies you have authority to call other side and begin settlement negotiations 4. Client comes to lawyer and says “I want you to act on my behalf. Three Types of Authority: 1. Authority: Power to alter relationships that principal gives to agent a. The lawyer tortiously misrepresents to the third person that the lawyer has authority to make a contract. conveyance. Direct communication b. Applies to all lawyers: when you get a client. or assist future or ongoing acts in the representation that the lawyer reasonably believes to be unlawful (2) to make decisions or take actions in the representation that the lawyer reasonably believes to be required by law or an order of a tribunal MR 1. unless the lawyer manifests that the lawyer does not warrant that the lawyer is authorized to act or the other party knows that the lawyer is not authorized to act. conveyance. as the lawyer knows or reasonably should know.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. or affirmation on behalf of the client and the third person reasonably relies on the misrepresentation. a lawyer is subject to liability to third persons on contracts the lawyer entered into on behalf of the client if: a. and to prosecution as provided in the criminal law. counsel. Client wants you to settle case. or b. or affirmation on behalf of the client. relies on the lawyer’s credit. you must communicate your lack of authority to third party §23 AUTHORITY RESERVED TO A LAWYER As between client and lawyer. The lawyer purports to make a contract. (3) A lawyer is subject to liability to a third person for damages for loss proximately caused by the lawyer’s acting without authority from a client under §26 if: a. Not true form of agency law b. Inherent Authority: Situation where people expect you to have authority. or b.” 2. a lawyer retains authority that may not be overridden by a contract with or an instruction from the client (1) to refuse to perform.2(a) SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION AND ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN CLIENT AND LAWYER 4 . Apparent Authority: Not based on manifestations from client to you. (2) Unless at the time of contracting the lawyer or third person disclaimed such liability. If you are in position where you will be perceived to have power that you do not have. you become invariably the agent for that client 3. based on manifestations from client to someone else a.com (1) For improper conduct while representing a client. The client’s existence or identity was not disclosed to the third person. a lawyer is subject to professional discipline as stated n §5. to civil liability as stated in Chapter 4. The contract is between the lawyer and a third person who provides goods or services used by lawyers and who.

as required by Rule 1. Client does not create apparent authority for his attorney to settle case merely by retaining attorney. In a criminal case.0(e). as to a plea to be entered. after consultation with the lawyer. Restatement 3rd does away with it. a lawyer shall abide by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation and. Holding: Client not bound by lawyer’s agreement because lawyer did not have actual authority or apparent authority. shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. as defined in Rule 1. as a practical matter when you’re in a proceeding that involves a number of parties the judges will want to and will find a way to hold your client to what you do and say. Some local rules will require you to have power Type of Authority Authority Implied Authority (still “authority”) Apparent authority Created by Assent of client. manifested to lawyer Implication from assent of client. In Re: Grievance Proceeding Rule: Lawyer responsible for obeying MR and comments accompanying them – cannot contract around the mandatory MR. Reputation in context of Apparent Authority Fennell v TLB Rule: In order to create apparent authority. the lawyer shall abide by the client’s decision. MR requires lawyers to quickly inform client of all settlement offers Holding: Agreement violated rules but lawyer was not punished because court concluded that disciplining lawyer years after an unrepeated and relatively minor violation of the MR would not serve purpose of attorney disciplinary proceedings. MR 1. whether to waive jury trial and whether the client will testify.com (a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d). Here the agreement violated the rules but he the lawyers conduct did not. A lawyer shall abide by a client’s decision whether to settle a matter. A lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as impliedly authorized to carry out the representation.4. is required by these rules (2) Reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished (3) Keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter (4) Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. and (5) Consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law (b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.4 COMMUNICATION (a) A lawyer shall: (1) Promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client’s informed consent. manifested to lawyer Manifestation by client to third party that lawyer has authority Grants power to Alter client’s legal rights and obligations within bounds of client assent Do things necessary to carry out client instruction Alter client’s legal rights and obligations within bounds of 5 . the principal myst manifest to a third party that he consents to have the act done on his behalf by the person purporting to act for him. Lawyer cannot create his own apparent authority.

as far as reasonably possible.2(c) SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION AND ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN CLIENT AND LAWYER (c) A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent. the lawyer shall. financial or other harm unless action is taken and 6 . whether because of minority. MR 1.) Holding: No actual or apparent authority existed here. Client has right to redress against attorney Note: Efficiency concern – a rule that did not enable an attorney to bind a client to in court action would impeded the efficient and finality of courtroom proceedings and permit stop and go disruption of the court’s calendar. maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client (b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity. however inherent authority did.Attorney must be specifically authorized to settle and compromise a claim .Attorney has no apparent authority to bind clien to agreement for arbitration Holding: Client was not bound by lawyer’s agreement to binding arbitration because he did not have apparent authority to do so – arbitration involves “ends” and therefore that decision rests with the client.Attorney is without authority to waive findings so that no appeal can be made. is at risk of substantial physical. an attorney has the inherent power to settle a claim when the attorney attends a settlement procedure governed by the ADR rules – protects third party because the principal puts the attorney in a position to trust and should therefore bear the loss. task of words is to change context Blanton v Womancare Rule: Attorney is not authorized merely by virtue of retention to impair the client’s substantial right or the cause of action itself . or for some other reason.14 CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY (a) When a client’s capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished. Olfe v Gordon MR 1. .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. mental impairment.com Inherent agency power (where recognized) Appearance in court proceeding manifestation Alter client’s rights and obligations as needed to enforce result of proceeding Kivol v. Important: Must disclaim authority to bind the client  disclaimer of performative utterance.Attorney must not stipulate to a matter that would eleminate an essential defense . Retention of attorney confers inherent power on attorney to bind the client to in-court proceedings (No apparent authority. Simon Television Rule: In the absence of a communication of lack of authority by the attorney.

maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client and act in the best interests of the client as stated in subsection (2) (2) A lawyer representing a client with diminished capacity as described by Subsection (1) and for whom no guardian or other representative is available to act. unless: a. the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action.6. MR 1. as far as reasonably possible. with respect to a matter within the scope of the representation. People Rule: Decision whether to request jury instructions on lesser offenses is a tactical decision that rests with defense counsel after consultation with the defendant.com cannot adequately act in the client’s own interest. including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and. the client’s lawyer must treat that person as entitled to act with respect to the client’s interests in the matter. in appropriate cases. mental disability. (c) Information relating to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by Rule 1. (4) A lawyer representing a client with diminished capacity as described in Subsection (1) may seek the appointment of a guardian or take other protective action within the scope of the representation when doing so is practical and will advance the client’s objectives or interests. or b. USA v Theodore Kaczynksi Holding: Lawyers can use insanity defense over the objection of defendant in criminal case. the lawyer must. whether because of minority. §24 A CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY (1) When a client’s capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with the representation is diminished.14 – tells you what to do if you have a client you believe their capacity is diminished for some reason. the lawyer shall maintain as far as possible a normal relationship with the client You may take reasonably necessary protective actions It tells you that you can disclose information about the client reasonable necessary to protect the client’s interest. Holding: Decision is for lawyer. physical illness. determined as stated in subsection (2) Arko v.1 MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS 7 .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. even if the client expresses no wishes or gives contrary instructions. conservator or guardian. That person instructs the lawyer to act in a matter that the lawyer knows will violate the person’s legal duties toward the client. case remanded to trial court for new trial where jury will receive lesser non-included offense instruction (D still retains trial rights and decisions of what jury instruction to request requires skill. When taking protective action pursuant to paragraph (b). The lawyer represents the client in a matter against the interests of that person. (3) If a client with diminished capacity as described in Subsection (1) has a guardian or other person legally entitled to act for the client. CA doesn’t have anything like that MR 3.6(a) to reveal information about the client. but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client’s interests. seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem. pursue the lawyer’s reasonable view of the client’s objectives or interests as the client would define them if able to make adequately considered decisions on the matter. must. or other cause. Client’s conviction reversed. the lawyer is impliedly authorized under Rule1.

2 IF limitation is reasonable and client gives informed consent Lawyers who limit scope of representation must make sure the client understands: what lawyers will do. A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding. unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous. or (f) Request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant information to the other party unless 1. the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client. practical implications of the agreement (may even need to advise as to matters not handling) • Some unbundling may be impermissible either as a matter of disciplinary rules or tort law • Must perform competently the slice of the representation you undertook (still owe duties to client) o This is a way for clients to afford some legal services where they could not otherwise afford any Way to allocate authority through compartmentalization DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY MR 1. the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of an accused. and 2. (b) Falsify evidence. modification or reversal of existing law. MR 3. what lawyer won’t do. the credibility of a witness. which includes a good faith argument for an extension.4 FAIRNESS TO OPPOSING PARTY AND COUNSEL A lawyer shall not (a) Unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter. may nevertheless so defend the proceeding as to require that every element of the case be established. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do such act. or the respondent in a proceeding that could result in incarceration. allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence. (e) In trial. except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists (d) In pretrial procedure. the lawyer reasonably believes that the person’s interests will not be adversely affected by refraining from giving such information Unbundling Agreement between lawyer and client where lawyer will provide some (but not all) service necessary to resolve the client’s problem • Authorized by MR 1.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause.2 EXPEDITING LITIGATION A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client. make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party.com A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding. counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely. or assert or controvert an issue therein. MR 3. or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness. or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law (c) Knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION 8 . destroy.

§62 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION WITH CLIENT CONSENT A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when the client consents after being adequately informed concerning the use or disclosure. a lawyer who uses confidential information of a client for the lawyer’s pecuniary gain or other than in the practice of law must account to the client for any profits made. to establish a defense to a criminal charge or civil claim against the lawyer based upon conduct in which the client was involved. The lawyer must take steps reasonable in the circumstances to protect confidential client information against impermissible use or disclosure by the lawyer’s associates or agents that may adversely affect a material interest of the client or otherwise than as instructed by the client (2) except as stated in §62.com (a) a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent. The lawyer may not use or disclose confidential client information as defined in §59 if there is a reasonable prospect that doing so will adversely affect a material interest of the client or if the client has instructed the lawyer not to make use or disclose such information b. §61 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION TO ADVANCE CLIENT’S INTERESTS A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when the lawyer reasonably believes that doing so will advance the interests of the client in the representation. mitigate.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. §60 A LAWYER’S DUTY TO SAFEGUARD CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT INFORMATION (1) Except as provided in §61-67. §59 DEFINITION OF CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT INFORMATION Confidential client information consists of information relating to representation of a client. during and after representation of a client: a. or rectify substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another that is reasonably certain to result or has resulted from the client’s commission of a crime or fraud in furtherance of which the client has used the lawyer’s services (4) to secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with these rules (5) to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client. or (6) to comply with other law or a court order. §63 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION WHEN REQUIRED BY LAW 9 . other than information that is generally known. the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b) (b) a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer believes necessary: (1) to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm (2) to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer’s services (3) to prevent. or to respond to allegations in any proceeding concerning the lawyer’s representation of the client.

the lawyer must. The crime or fraud threatens substantial financial loss b. the lawyer must. rectify. if feasible. (2) If a crime or fraud described in Subsection (1) has already occurred. The client has employed or is employing the lawyer’s services in the matter in which the crime or fraud is committed. The loss has not yet occurred c. §64 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION IN A LAWYER’S SELF-DEFENSE A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when and to the extent that the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to defend the lawyer or the lawyer’s associate or agent against a charge or threatened charge by any person that the lawyer or such associate or agent acted wrongfully in the course of representing a client. (3) Before using or disclosing information under this section. if feasible.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. after the lawyer takes reasonably appropriate steps to assert that the information is privileged or otherwise protected against disclosure. solely by reason of such action or inaction. or barred from recovery against a client or third person. and a. the lawyer must. OR MITIGATE SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL LOSS (1) A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when the lawyer reasonably believes that its use or disclosure is necessary to prevent a crime or fraud. rectify or mitigate the loss. if feasible. advise the client to warn the victim or to take another action to prevent. (3) A lawyer who takes action or decides not to take action permitted under this section is not. If the client or another person has already acted. if feasible. make a good-faith effort to persuade the client not to act. §67 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION TO PREVENT.com A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when required by law. The lawyer must. or mitigate the loss. RECTIFY. The lawyer’s client intends to commit the crime or fraud either personally or through a third person. a lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when the lawyer reasonably believes its use or disclosure is necessary to prevent. subject to professional discipline. 10 . also advise the client of the lawyer’s ability to use or disclose information as provided in this section and the consequences thereof. §65 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION IN A COMPENSATION DISPUTE A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when and to the extent that the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to permit the lawyer to resolve a dispute with the client concerning compensation or reimbursement that the lawyer reasonably claims the client owes the lawyer. If the client or another person has already acted. if feasible. and d. advise the client to warn the victim or to take other action to prevent the harm and advise the client of the lawyer’s ability to use or disclose information as provided in this section and the consequences thereof. make a good-faith effort to persuade the client not to act. the lawyer must. liable for damages to the lawyer’s client or any third person. §66 USING OR DISCLOSING INFORMATION TO PREVENT DEATH (1) A lawyer may use or disclose confidential client information when the lawyer reasonably believes that its use or disclosure is necessary to prevent certain death or serious bodily harm to a person (2) Before using or disclosing information under this section.

liable for damages to the lawyer’s client or any third person.breach of fiduciary duty Rule: Attorney may not at any time use against his former client knowledge or information acquired by virtue of the previous relationship. significantly narrower 5) Generally speaking. solely by reason of such action or inaction.6(a). D was to refrain from acquiring a pecuniary interest involving collection work for these trust funds unless they first notified and obtained informed consent of P. controlled by client MR 1. subject to professional discipline. or barred from recovery against a client or third person. applies only in situations where rules of evidence apply. to oppose client.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. 4. Holding: Rule prohibiting lawyer from representing later client whose interests are directly adverse to former client in same/substantially related matter do not prohibit lawyer from engaging in pro se activities that are adverse to client.Here lawyer violated the rule because he made reference to information learned from the client. Duty to protect confidential information continues even after formal relationship ends Holding: Due to the pre-existing attorney-client relationship during which D obtained confidential information about P’s business. Duty of confidentiality does not actually exist as such but lawyers treat it as though it does 1) it is not the attorney-client privilege. scope of privilege is communications between attorney and client.9(c) Woods Rule: Lawyer may use information from a former client if that information has becomes generally known.6 – flag this in your rules – says a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the client unless they have given informed consent or permitted by (b) B&P 6068 (e) – Duty of attorney to maintain confidence at every peril to his self or herself Duty of Confidentiality Distinguished from Attorney Client Privilege Brennan’s v Brennan’s Use of Client info for Personal Benefit Welch v E&T .MR 1. Disclosure of Client Info NOT for Personal Benefit In Re Pressly 11 . .com (4) A lawyer who takes action or decides not to take action permitted under this section is not.1(a). O’Hagan – tampering with client funds Disclosure of Client Info for Personal Benefit . 1. it is a duty you owe by virtue of being a lawyer at all times and all places 2) you may not use or disclose information that is not generally known which you learn in the course and scope of representing a client 3) 2 prohibitions: USE and DISCLOSURE 4) Attorney-client privilege is not a duty. the duty of confidentiality restrains what otherwise would be voluntary disclosures and the privilege is asserted to lawyers can’t be compelled to say things the client doesn’t want them to say. that was not generally known. it is a rule of evidence that allows you to refuse to offer testimony.

Disclosure Authorized by Implication .Lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make an informed decision regarding the representations .MR 1. or fraudulent act in furtherance of which the lawyer’s services had been used.1 says you can’t lie to opposing counsel . EXCEPTIONS TO CONFIDENTIALITY RULE – when it is ok to breach MR 1.Use or disclosure authorized by implication can present tricky problems. K&C .com Rule: Lawyer may not disclose client confidences without current client’s consent.get the all over waiver signed up front . His actions caused client distress and could have hurt litigation.6. the safer course is to get explicit client consent to the action you wish to take.MR 4.13(f)-(g) o You represent the entity and not its members Perez v.It is the Lawyers job to clarify to entity members that he represents the entity itself and not them Rule: Confidential information received during the course of any fiduciary relationship may not be used or disclosed to the detriment of the one from whom the information is obtained.Lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless authorized by client or necessary to carry out representation . illegal.EXCEPTION: A lawyer may reveal confidential information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal. Attorney fiduciary responsibilities may arise even during preliminary consultations regarding the attorney’s possible retention if the attorney enters into discussion of the client’s legal problems with a view toward undertaking representation.deal with the fact that mistakes happen Entity Representation and Entity Constituents . Confidentiality with Multiple Clients AvB Rule: Duty of Confidentiality v.Negligent disclosure of information is still disclosure Holding: Lawyer deserves to be publicly reprimanded because he knew he was violating disciplinary rule even if he did not do so with knowledge of all possible consequences. Franklin . Duty to inform clients of material facts . Holding: Attorney client relationship existed at time P gave consent to Ds and Ds owed at least fiduciary duty not to misrepresent to P that his conversations with them were confidential.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.§61 as long as following with §21(3) and §20 Adams v. Comment 10 12 . When in doubt.don’t make typos . even to opposing counsel . Holding: Firm may disclose existence of husband’s illegitimate child to wife (but does not have to) Real lesson – don’t get in this situation .

to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm McClure v. Thompson Rule: Guiding rule for purposes of exception for preventing criminal acts is objective reasonableness in light of the surrounding circumstances. the lawyer may respond to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to establish a defense. Lawyer Self-Defense . goes and kills a guy . 13 . disciplinary or other proceeding and can be based on a wrong allegedly committed by the lawyer against the client or on a wrong alleged by a third person. Such a charge can arise in a civil. where a proceeding has been commenced. It’s a may.To show the bad guy a misaddressed envelope is to breach the duty of confidentiality .DISCLOSE ONLY AS MUCH INFO AS YOU NEED TO PROVE INNOCENCE Meyerhofer is the mother of all Self-Defense cases – not a great case for the exception because the original disclosure wasn’t made to an allegation so it doesn’t fit the elements for the exception. and circumstances depend on information supplied by D Holding: Mecca made the disclosure reasonably believing it was necessary to prevent the client from committing a criminal act (death) – Mecca therefore did not violate the duty of confidentiality in a manner that rendered his assistance as counsel constitutionally ineffective In Re Goebel .Bad guy wants to know where the guy lived who was a witness from a lawyer.Even though he kills the client’s husband. another question we don’t know is what is in the binder – Privilege is a shield not a sword. for example. criminal. he did nothing wrong in not calling the cops . he ends up figuring it out.MR 1.Lawyer does not have to wait until proceeding to use exception o As soon as accused he may defend himself by violating confidentiality .6 (CMT 10) First Federal Savings v Oppenheim . cannot be made into a sword mechanism of selective disclosure Physical and Economic Harm .6(b)(1) o Allows but does not require disclosure.So what do you do? .com Where a legal claim or disciplinary charge alleges complicity of the lawyer in a client’s conduct or other misconduct of the lawyer involving representation of the client.The issue in this case is not whether it adequately triggers the self defense exception but what it means to use the exception . of course. a person claiming to have been defrauded by the lawyer and client acting together.MR 1. so that the defense may be established by responding directly to a third party who has made such an assertion.call the cops and say I think they’re going to go kill x will you go protect x o don’t have to disclose your client is going to commit a crime. The same is true with respect to a claim involving the conduct or representation of a former client. shows a missed address envelope. Paragraph (b)(5) does not require the lawyer to await the commencement of an action or proceeding that charges such complicity. The lawyer’s right to respond arises when an assertion of such complicity has been made. there’s no discipline for not calling the cops.give the address and dump it on your partner that represents the bad guy .Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Not known to bad guy is not the same as not generally known . The right to defend also applies.

§70 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE – “PRIVILEGED PERSONS” Privileged persons within the meaning of §68 are the client (including a prospective client).13(c)(2) .If you know a constituent (officers. directors.This means you should report it to the higher up official of the entity and if they don’t do anything then you can reveal confidences of constitutents under MR 1. then o You MUST act in the best interest of the entity and not the constituent . an attorney-client privilege may be invoked as provided in §86 with respect to: (1) a communication (2) made between privileged persons (3) in confidence (4) for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance for the client §69 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE – “COMMUNICATION” A communication within the meaning of §68 is any expression through which a privileged person. and agents of the lawyer who facilitate the representation. the client’s lawyer.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.13©(2) ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE §68 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement. and o The conduct is related to your representation. the communicating person reasonably believes that no one will learn the contents of the communication except a privileged person as defined in §70 or another person with whom communications are protected under a similar privilege. undertakes to convey information to another privileged person and any document or other record revealing such an expression. as defined in §70. other people who act on behalf on the entity) is o Beaching a duty to the entity or breaking the law in a way attributable to the entity. at the time and in the circumstances of the communication. agents of either who facilitate communications between them. §72 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE – LEGAL ASSISTANCE AS THE OBJECT OF A PRIVLEGED COMMUNICATION A communication is made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance within the meaning of §68 if it is made to or to assist a person (1) who is a lawyer or who the client or prospective client reasonably believes to be a lawyer.MR 1. and o Threatens substantial harm to the entity. §71 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE – “IN CONFIDENCE” A communication is in confidence within the meaning of §68 if.com Protecting an Entity Client . and (2) whom the client or prospective client consults for the purpose of obtaining legal assistance §77 DURATION OF PRIVILEGE 14 .

an agent of the lawyer. is a member of the bar of a court. or other for-profit or not-for-profit organization. and b. A lawyer. without the presence of strangers c. for the purpose of securing primarily either i. Has waived the privilege. or ii. the tribunal has discretion to invoke the privilege (2) A person invoking a privilege must ordinarily object contemporaneously to an attempt to disclose the communication and. and d. if the assertion is contested. either personally or through counsel or another authorized agent b. by his client b.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. (3) A person invoking a waiver of or exception to the privilege (§78-85) must assert it and. trust. Traditional elements of attorney client privilege: 1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client 2) the person to whom the communication was made a. demonstrate each element of the waiver or exception. A client. estate. an opinion of law or ii. §86 INVOKING THE PRIVILEGE AND ITS EXCEPTIONS (1) When an attempt is made to introduce in evidence or obtain discovery of a communication privileged under §68: a. the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as provided in §86 at any time during or after termination of the relationship between client or prospective client and lawyer. not for the purpose of committing a crime or tort 4) the privilege has been a. sole proprietorship. in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer 3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed a. or his or her subordinate. unless the client i. the attorney-client privilege extends to a communication that: (1) otherwise qualifies as privileged under §68-72 (2) is between an agent of the organization and a privileged person as defined in §70 (3) concerns a legal matter of interest to the organization. other agents of the organization who reasonably need to know of the communication in order to act for the organization. partnership. unincorporated association. and b.com Unless waived (§78-80) or subject to exception (§81-85). if the objection is contested. a personal representative of an incompetent or deceased client. or a person succeeding to the interest of a client may invoke or waive the privilege. assistance in some legal proceeding. and (4) is disclosed only to a. privileged persons as defined in §70. legal services or iii. 15 . Notwithstanding failure to invoke the privilege as specified in Subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). demonstrate each element of the privilege under §68. Has authorized the lawyer or agent to waive it. c. not waived by the client §73 THE PRIVILEGE FOR AN ORGAINIZATIONAL CLIENT When a client is a corporation. claimed and b. or an agent of a client from whom a privileged communication is sought must invoke the privilege when doing so appears reasonably appropriate.

(b) If a lawyer for an organization knows that an officer. members. then the lawyer shall proceed as reasonably necessary in the best interest of the organization.7.7. constituents.com Attorney-Client privilege in connection with entity clients 2 rules – MR 1. or a refusal to act. including. (f) In dealing with an organization’s directors. employees. or by the shareholders. Insofar as privilege is concerned. intends to act or refuses to act in a matter related to the representation that is a violation of a legal obligation to the organization. shall proceed as the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to assure that the organization’s highest authority is informed of the lawyer’s discharge or withdrawal. but only if and to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent substantial injury to the organization (d) Paragraph (c) shall not apply with respect to information relating to a lawyer’s representation by an organization to investigate an alleged violation of law. a lawyer shall explain the identity of the client to them so they are aware MR 1. if warranted by the circumstances. or to defend the organization or an officer.13(a) – when you are retained by an entity you represent the entity itself. shareholders or other constituents. employees. The person that hires you. employee or other person associated with the organization is engaged in action. you don’t represent the directors. members. then the lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation whether or not Rule 1. shareholders or other constituents. a lawyer shall explain the identity of the client when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the organization’s interests are adverse to those of the constituents with whom the lawyer is dealing.13 ORGANIZATION AS CLIENT (a) A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents the organization acting through its duly authorized constituents. subject to the provisions of Rule 1. or who withdraws under circumstances that require or permit the lawyer to take action under either of those paragraphs. 16 . Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so. the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization insists upon or fails to address in a timely and appropriate manner an action. officers. you don’t represent the officers. the lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization. officers. and that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization. (g) A lawyer representing an organization may also represent any of its directors. pays you and has the power to fire you is NOT your client.13(f) In dealing with officers. directors.6 permits such disclosure. to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. you don’t represent the employers. and 2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the violation is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the organization. the consent shall be given by an appropriate official of the organization other than the individual who is represented. employee or other constituent associated with the organization against a claim arising out of an alleged violation of law. If the organization’s consent to the dual representation is required by Rule 1. (e) A lawyer who reasonably believes that he or she has been discharged because of the lawyer’s actions take pursuant to Paragraphs (b) or (c).Downloaded From OutlineDepot. that is clearly a violation of law. The entity is. (c) Except as provided in paragraph d 1) despite the lawyer’s efforts in accordance with paragraph (b). the privilege is not to whom you are speaking but to the entity 1.

A fact is one thing and a communication concerning a fact is an entirely different thing. LK Rule: What is vital to the privilege is that the communication be made in confidence for the purpose of obtaining legal advice from the lawyer. or if the advice sought is the accountant’s rather than the lawyer’s. Rule: Client identification and fee information are not privileged. . the topic is not off limits just because the lawyers played a role. Battelle Lab .. o New Tekni-Plex is without authority to assert the attorney-client privilege to preclude M&L from revealing to Tang the contents of the communications conveyed by old 17 . USA . no further Holding: Since questions about the adequacy of a search do not entail legal advice. NOT Facts UpJohn .When filing a form for receiving cash payment in excess of 10k attorney did not put payors name and claimed he didn’t have to because of ACP .Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Holding: Disqualification upheld: New Tekni Plex is a “former client” of M&L.com Communications.The primary purpose of the communication must be to obtain legal assistance or advice and that must predominate other aspects of the communication. the APC has been waived.Court did not agree.The privilege does not extend to facts communicated. Privilege encompasses only those confidential communications necessary to obtaining legal advice Holding: Lefcourt had no reasonable basis for failing to provide information required by IRS statute – incrimination rationale not a valid reason to invoke APC In Confidence . stating this was a fact and not a communication. such as business advice Feldberg Rule: Privilege extends to the extent it facilitates the candor necessary to obtain legal advice. Between an Attorney and a Client US v. and presence of accountant was necessary to permit effective consultation between lawyer and client where purpose was to obtain lawyer’s (not accountant’s) legal advice Relating to Legal Advice Neuder v. there is a substantial relationship between the current and former representations. interests are materially adverse. Holding: Accountant could claim APC because accounting concepts are foreign to lawyers. Wife was non-client.§79 Minnesota v TDR Rule: APC does not apply to confidences given in the presence of third parties Holding: Rhodes was the sole client. IF what is sought is not legal advice but only accounting service . no privilege exists. Because discussions occurred in the presence of third party (wife).So a client may have to disclose facts told to an attorney but not the discussion about those facts Lefcourt v. Entities and Privilege Techni-Plex .

Rule: Where efforts made to run the pre-existing business entity and manage its affairs.Lawyer communicated with them in their personal capacity . of obtaining assistance to engage in a crime or fraud or to aid a third person to do so or uses the materials for such a purpose Does not include a client confession after they’ve committed a crime and come to you for representation 18 . - In re Grand Jury Subpoena Rule: Joint defense agreement does not increase the # of parties whose consent is needed to waive the APC.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. of obtaining assistance to engage in a crime or fraud aiding a third person to do so. and . later accomplished. VS.3 DEALING WITH UNREPRESENTED PERSON In dealing on behalf of a client with a person who is not represented by counsel. later accomplished. uses the lawyer’s advice or other services to engage in or assist in crime or fraud §93 CLIENT CRIME OR FRAUD Work-product immunity does not apply to materials prepared when a client consults a lawyer for the purpose. When the lawyer knows or reasonably know that the unrepresented person misunderstands the lawyer’s role in the matter. the lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding. or (b) regardless of the client’s purpose at the time of consultation. despite the existence of an indivicual APC relationship between him and the corporations counsel. 5 factor test. The lawyer shall not give legal advice to an unrepresented person. . though individual issues related to corporate ones can be privileged MR 4.They made it clear they sought advice in their personal capacity .Did not concern corporate issues. Crime/Fraud exception §82 CLIENT CRIME OR FRAUD The privilege does not apply to a communication occurring when a client (a) consults a lawyer for the purpose. if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the interests of such a person are or have a reasonable possibility of being in conflict with the interests of the client.A corporation may unilaterally waive the APC with respect to any communications made by a corporate officer in his corporate capacity. successor management stands in the shoes of prior management and controls the attorney-client privilege with respect to matters concerning the company’s operations.Individual claims of privilege fail because the oral joint defense agreement that they rely on cannot defeat OldCo’s express waiver of privilege.com Tekni-Plex concerning the merger transaction—New Tekni Plex also does not control M&L’s files relating to its prior representation of old Tekni-Plex during the acquisition. Manager’s interest must yield to the shareholder’s interest in disclosure of the privileged materials.Such communications were confidential. other than the advice to secure legal counsel. a lawyer shall not state or imply that the lawyer is disinterested. . it merely prevents disclosure of communication made in the course of preparing a joint defense by the third party to whom it was made. Holding: APC extends only to those communications that involved Roe and Moe’s individual rights and responsibilities arising out of their actions as officer of the corporation. individual must show . The mere transfer of assets with no attempt to continue the pre-existing operation generally does not transfer the attorney client privilege.they approached lawyer to seek advice .

(2) Unless the co-clients have agreed otherwise. “to encourage openness and cooperation between joint clients.com In Re Sealed Case Rule: 2 requirements for waiver of crime/fraud privilege: . OR FAILURE TO OBJECT The attorney-client privilege is waived if the client. they were discoverable in an action between the joint clients. unless it has been waived by the client who made the communication. maybe you can keep one of them or just walk out of the whole thing. When you get out there is no joint client relationship and there are no communications subject to the joint client relationship exception Eureka . DISCLAIMER.Clients are insured and insurer and they disagreed .(1) Client must have made or received privileged information with the intent to further an unlawful act.The court ruled that the policy behind the co-client privilege.(2) Client must have carried out the crime/fraud Holding: Attorney client privilege not waived because it cannot be assumed that VP was acting on behalf of company when he decided to act illegally. . you should get out of the conflict.Insurer wanted access to documents claiming that because those communications were generated during the attorney’s joint representation of the parties on the claim against the insured. §79 SUBSEQUENT DISCLOSURE 19 .” does not apply to matter known at the time of communication not to be in the common interest of the attorney’s two clients. the client’s lawyer. and any coclient may invoke the privilege. or b. reasons of judicial administration require that the client not be permitted to revoke the disclaimer (3) in a proceeding before a tribunal. fails to object properly to an attempt by another person to give or exact testimony or other evidence of a privileged communication. a communication of either co-client that otherwise qualifies as privileged under §68-72 and relates to matters of common interest is privileged as against third persons. . IF a conflict develops between joint clients. another person reasonably relies on the disclaimer to that person’s detriment. JOINT CLIENTS §75 THE PRIVILEGE OF CO-CLIENTS (1) If two or more persons are jointly represented by the same lawyer in a matter. Cannot reasonably infer from the meeting that the company was consulting its general counsel with the intention of committing a crim. a communication described in Subsection (1) is not privileged as between the co-clients in a subsequent adverse proceeding between them.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.” WAIVER §78 AGREEMENT. or other authorized agent of the client: (1) agrees to waive the privilege (2) disclaims protection of the privilege and a.

Employs the communication to aid the witness while testifying. or other authorized agent of the client voluntarily discloses the communication in a non-privileged communication.com The attorney-client privilege is waived if the client. The client acted upon the advice of a lawyer or that the advice was otherwise relevant to the legal significance of the client’s conduct. 20 . and the tribunal finds that the disclosure is required in the interests of justice Inadvertent Disclosure .(2) Balancing approach to render decision . say I got this document and it looks like it was privileged. you look at the document only long enough to ascertain to have reason to think its privileged. Mitsubishi Motors . or b. If you think it was wrongly withheld you are then supposed to move to compel it to production and fight the privilege out waiver focuses on the holder of privilege. is this a screw up or did you decide to waive or what? Usually they will have a messenger waiting to retrieve it. negligent. Court will apply the reasonableness standard – what would reasonably competent counsel do.4(b) State Compensation Insurance Fund v WPS If you get a document from an opposing party that looks like a privilege. counsel must immediately notify opposing counsel and try to resolve the situation. §80 PUTTING ASSISTANCE OR A COMMUNICATION IN ISSUE (1) The attorney-client privilege is waived for any relevant communication if the client asserts as to a material issue in a proceeding that: a. which is client client may waive expressly or by implication o express may be verbal or by conduct lawyer is client’s agent o acts of lawyer bind client o but not all of them note three different approaches (n. there is only one way to deal with it. .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. the client’s lawyer. then the lawyer who receives it may be disqualified from further involvement in the case if he studied the info Zerlene v. you call the person that sent it to you. or otherwise wrongful. 154) Burden on complaining lawyer to show inadvertence - 3 Approaches to Inadvertent Disclosure Problem . or b. you stop reading it.If disclosure does not amount to a waiver. Once it becomes apparent that it is privileged.§§78-80 . (2) The attorney-client privilege is waived for a recorded communication if a witness: a.(3) Focus on Intent No Matter what Approach is used the final determination of whether an assertion of the APC will be upheld in an inadvertent disclosure context depends upon whether the client either expressly or impliedly waived the privilege.Rule: Attorney in these circumstances may not read a document any more closely than is necessary to ascertain that it is privileged. A lawyer’s assistance was ineffective.If disclosure amounts to a waiver then the party receiving the information may study and use the info without penalty .MR 4.(1) Strict responsibility – Client’s (and lawyer by agency theory) intent is irrelevant . Employed the communication in preparing to testify.

Partial waiver permits a client who has disclosed a portion of the privileged communications to continue asserting the privilege as to the remaining portions of communications Disclosure Within Another Privileged Relationship .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. don’t let clients talk to other clients 21 . a communication of any such client that otherwise qualifies as privileged under §68-72 that relates to the matter is privileged as against third persons. would have concluded the materials were privileged (Disqualification risk) Holding: Opposing counsel violated rule when he took advatage of inadvertently disclosed information.2 or more parties want to cooperate but are unwilling/unable to be represented as joint clients by a lawyer INTEREST EXCEPTION §76 THE PRIVILEGE IN COMMON-INTEREST ARRANGEMENTS (1) If two or more clients with a common interest in a litigated or nonlitigated matter are represented by separate lawyers and they agree to exchange information concerning the matter.com knowing the circumstances of litigation. (2) Unless the clients have agreed otherwise.Selective waiver permits the client who has disclosed privileged communications to one party to continue asserting the privilege against other parties .Disclosure of a privileged communication within the scope of some other privilege is not a waiver o Ex: Spousal privilege Common Interest Exception to Waiver = Prisoner’s Dillemma . Waiver occurred here to particular matters discussed in the book. there are a series of steps that have to occur: 1) the communication has to be privileged in the first place a. unless it has been waived by the client who made the communication. no common interest privilege For this to have any affect. then acted unethically in making use of it  DQ approapriate - Deliberate Disclosure Von Bulow – Book about Trial/Case Rule: The client’s offer of his own or the attorney’s testimony as to a specific communication to the attorney is a waiver as to all other communications to the attorney on the same matter Holding: Extra-judicial disclosure of attorney-client communication does not waive the privilege as to undisclosed portions of the communication. Any such client may invoke the privilege. a communication described in subsection (1) is not privileged as between clients described in subsection (1) in a subsequent adverse proceeding between them Common Interest Exception – An agreement among parties with a common legal interest to keep confidential communications among them with respect to that interest Exception is not a privilege. but this waiver cannot be broadened to waiver of discussions that were not published Selective and Partial Waiver .

Opinion Work Product Upjohn 22 . with provisions conditionally waiving confidentiality. The Basic Doctrine • Sources of information attorney has acquired from factual investigations including inquiries. but an exception that there was no waiver occurred there USA v. and witness selection have work-product like quality o Ex: 400 witnesses available to interview. self-defense. Documents must fit either work product or attorney-client privilege Holding: JDA does not protect documents from disclosure.Each JDA submitted must explicitly state that it does not create an attorney-client relationship. interviews. Sup Court Rule: Evidence code does not allow creation of new privileges. Stepney Rule: DQ is proper where a party seeking DQ can show that an attorney for another defendant actually obtained relevant confidential information through a joint defense agreement. other work representation done on behalf of client in preparation for litigation CONTROLLED Client Lawyer BY EXCEPTIONS Crime-fraud. Ordinary v. that selection is protected by work-product doctrine  Selection on front end is work product  Selection of certain types of documents to examine also work product • Distinguish: underlying facts on document attorney reviews not protected o Work product does protect what comes out on the other side after attorney reviews those documents Attorney-Client Privilege Work-Product Doctrine PROTECTS Confidential communications relating to Mental impressions of counsel.com b.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. The court must first conclude the information contained in the documents is protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege or work product. prevent Crime-fraud. through subpoena or court order Holding: This is an attempt without necessity to secure written statements prepared by adverse counsel in the course of legal duty. . Oxy v. not settled. Taylor Rule: General policy against invading lawyer’s privacy is so well recognized that burden rests on the one who would invade privacy to justify production. self-defense death/GBI Hickman v. client 1 talks to lawyer 1 who talks to lawyer 2 who talks to client 2 c. attorney uses judgment to select 2. WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE A. Therefore it falls outside the arena of discover and the documents do not need to be produced. and must explicitly allow withdrawal upon notice Holding: Attorney who has client in JDA does NOT owe duty of loyalty to all defendants in JDA. can lawyer 1 talk to client 2? We don’t know. one case in 3rd circuit says that it is not within the scope of the exception Normally would be a waiver when L1 talks to L2. Then court must determine whether disclosures are reasonably necessary to accomplish purpose for which the parties consulted attorneys. Lawyer/Client may contract to create this additional duty.

and (5) Consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law (b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. strategies. Court can order production for which litigant makes adequate showing and focus its attention of whether the document or any potion of it should be disclosed. Production may also be justified where witnesses are no longer available or can only be reached with difficulty.1 COMPETENCE A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. §16 A LAWYER’S DUTIES TO A CLIENT – IN GENERAL 23 . skill. as defined in Rule 1. thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.4 COMMUNICATION (a) A lawyer shall: (1) Promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client’s informed consent. Court shall protect against disclosure of mental impressions. or legal theories of an attorney or other representative.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. and analyses concerning litigation REQUIREMENTS OF AND RELATING TO THE DUTY OF CARE MR 1.3 DILIGENCE A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client MR 1. Holding: A far stronger showing of necessity and unavailability by other means would be necessary to compel disclosure Prepared in Anticipation of Litigation Requirement US v. analyzing the outcome of that litigation does not lose protection because it was prepared to assist with a business decision Holding: Document at issue does not need to be disclosed.com Rule: Where relevant and non-privileged facts remain hidden in attorney’s file and where production of those facts is essential to the preparation of one’s case. conclusions. MR 1. while retaining the authority to protect against disclosure of the mental impressions. Aldman Rule: Where a document is created because of the prospect of litigation. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge.0(e) is required by these rules (2) Reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished (3) Keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter (4) Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.2(c) SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION AND ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN CLIENT AND LAWYER (c) A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent MR 1. discovery may be properly had. opinions.

if the lawyer fails to exercise care within the meaning of §52 and if that failure is a legal cause of injury within the meaning of §53. (6) act with reasonable competence and diligence (7) comply with obligations concerning the client’s confidences and property. as defined by the client after consultation.com To the extent consent with the lawyer’s other legal duties and subject to the other provisions of this restatement. and (8) fulfill valid contractual obligations to the client §20 LAWYER’S DUTY TO INFORM AND CONSULT WITH A CLIENT (1) a lawyer must keep a client reasonably informed about the matter and must consult with a client to a reasonable extent concerning decisions to be made by a lawyer under §21-23 (2) a lawyer must promptly comply with a client’s reasonable requests for information (3) a lawyer must notify a client of decisions to be made by the client under §21-23 and must explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding representation §48 PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE – ELEMENTS AND DEFENSES GENERALLY In addition to the other possible bases of civil liability described in §49. 50 and 56. (2) Proof of a violation of a rule or statute regulating the conduct of lawyers: a. unless the lawyer has a defense within the meaning of §54. §49 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY – GENERALLY In addition to the other possible bases of civil liability described in §48. deal honestly with the client. unless the lawyer has a defense within the meaning of §54. avoid impermissible conflicting interests. May be considered by a trier of fact as an aid in understanding and applying the standard of subsection (1) or §49 to the extent that (i) the rule or statute was 24 . in matters within the scope of the representation: (5) proceed in a manner reasonably calculated to advance a client’s lawful objectives. and 56. a lawyer must. 55. §50 DUTY OF CARE TO A CLIENT For purposes of liability under §48. and not employ advantages arising from the client-lawyer relationship in a manner adverse to the client. a lawyer owes a client the duty to exercise care within the meaning of §52 in pursuing the client’s lawful objectives in matters covered by the representation. and c. Does not give rise to an implied cause of action for professional negligence or breach of fiduciary duty b. Does not preclude other proof concerning the duty of care in subsection (1) or the fiduciary duty. a lawyer is civilly liable to a client of the lawyer breaches a fiduciary duty to the client set forth in §16(3) and if that failure is a legal cause of injury within the meaning of §53. §52 THE STANDARD OF CARE (1) For purposes of liability under §48 and 49.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. a lawyer is civilly liable for professional negligence to a person to whom the lawyer owes a duty of care within the meaning of §50 or §51. a lawyer who owes a duty of care must exercise the competence and diligence normally exercised by lawyers in similar circumstances.

The client or former client was subjected to improper pressure by the lawyer in reaching the settlement or b. (2) An agreement prospectively limiting a lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice is unenforceable (3) The client or former client may rescind an agreement settling a claim by the client or former client against the person’s lawyer if: a. 20. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge. 50-56 Beverly Hills v. Make an agreement prospectively limiting the lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice.com designed for the protection of persons in the position of the claimant and (ii) proof of the content and construction of such a rule or statute is relevant to the claimants claim.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.MR 1. or declaratory remedies against a lawyer in the circumstances and to the extent provided by generally applicable law governing such remedies. §56 LIABILITY TO A CLIENT OR NONCLIENT UNDER GENERAL LAW Except as provided in §57 and in addition to liability under §48-55. SSRK – Junior lawyers Rule: A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. 1. PROSPECTIVE LIABILITY WAIVER. (2) A client is entitled to restitutionary. a lawyer may not: a. or b. and (ii) the settlement was not fair and reasonable to the client or former client (4) For purposes of professional discipline. injunctive. thoroughness. A lawyer is not liable under §48 or 49 for any action or inaction the lawyer reasonably believed to be required by law. liability under §48 and 49 is subject to the defenses available under generally applicable principles of law governing respectively actions for professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. §53 CAUSATION AND DAMAGES A lawyer is liable under §48 or 49 only if the lawyer’s breach of a duty of care or breach of fiduciary duty was a legal cause of injury. 48-49. a lawyer is subject to liability to a client or nonclient when a nonlawyer would be in similar circumstances Civil Malpractice .4 . (i) the client or former client was not independently represented in negotiating the settlement.3-1. Settle a claim for such liability with an unrepresented client or former client without first advising that person in writing that independent representation is appropriate for connection therewith. skill. SETTLEMENT WITH A CLIENT (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section. §55 CIVIL REMEDIES OF A CLIENT OTHER THAN MALPRACTICE (1) A lawyer is subject to liability to a client for injury caused by breach of contract in the circumstances and to the extent provided by contract law.1-1. as determined under generally applicable principles of causation and damages §54 DEFENSES.2©. and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation 25 . including a professional rule.§§16.

Causation in both litigation and transactional work requires both but for and proximate cause. When a lawyer continues to represent a client  Until the client suffers applicable harm as a consequence of the attorney’s negligence.1: Duty of professional to use skill as other members of profession exercise . pick up phone. Sweet No such thing as breach of cause of action for breach of disciplinary rule .Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Limitations period for claims against lawyers – very short (1 year) o TOLLED during period while lawyer continues to represent client o Tactic: lawyer has duty to keep client informed under duty of care. including third-party actions (TORT) Causation and Damages Viner v. trial in a trial. many years later  May continue even after a client has replaced the attorney with another 26 . When an injury occurs o 2.4: Actual loss or damage resulting from professional negligence By accepting employment.  Varies from state to state  CA: 1 year after P discovers (or would have discovered) the facts constituting the wrongful act/ omission. care. requires demonstrate but for wrongful act your client would have come out better.2: Breach of that duty . MAY NOT double down!  Longer lawyer continues to represent his client in an effort to fix his mistake. attorney impliedly agrees to use ordinary judgment.com Holding: Junior lawyers are liable for malpractice if their passivity departs from the applicable standard of care Nichols v Keller Rule: Liability can exist when an attorney failed to provide advice. and diligence in the performance of the tasks he/she undertakes Holding: A lawyer who signs an application fro adjudication of a workers’ compensation claim and a lawyer who accepts a referral to prosecute the claim owe the claimant a duty of care to advise available remedies.3: Causal connection between negligent conduct and resulting injury . the client cannot establish a cause of action for malpractice • Period is tolled from when lawyer commits act to when P sustains actual injury o Speculative injuries are those which do not yet exist • Continuous representation tolls the limitations period even if the client is aware of the act or omission at issue o Representation may be deemed continuous where a hiatus separates a completion of transaction on behalf of a client and resumption of legal activities after a problem arises. whichever occurs first • 2 questions: o 1. OR 4 years from the date of the wrongful act/omission. Lawyer must fess up to client if he makes mistake. Must blow whistle on himself. not only when requested but also when failed to volunteer opinions when necessary to further the client’s objectives Elements of cause of action for PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE . the longer the limitations period is tolled. in litigation that’s relatively straight forward. and call client. skill. in the malpractice trial you put on the duty evidence and the breach evidence and you put on the causation case with a minitrail where you try the underlying matter within the malpractice suit Limitations and Tolling .

com    Failure to withdraw from representation will not. by itself. manner of proof. may be inferred from circumstances o Representation by one attorney does not toll claims that may exist with unaffiliated attorney  When lawyer leaves firm and takes client. restatement § 37.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. toll limitations period where facts otherwise indicate the representation has ended  Representation ends when client has or reasonably should have no expectation that the attorney will provide further legal services • If attorney remains silent. firm loses all ability to mitigate damage to the client Duty of loyalty would demand disclosure to inform client when he has legal malpractice action against you • Attorney who realizes she made mistake must immediately notify client of the mistake as well as the client’s right to obtain new counsel and sue the attorney for negligence • Attorney may not settle with client until attorney has informed client and has withdrawn from case Even core fiduciary duty claims are subject to the limitations period for malpractice Client may have3 claims: breach of K. breach of fiduciary duty • Client will often plead same facts on each claim and seek same relief on each claim o Duty of care  Malpractice claim o Duty of loyalty  Breach of fiduciary duty claim  Distinction may affect burden of proof. availability of punitive damages  How to establish claim: • Burden of proof: transactions voidable by client unless lawyer can demonstrate they are fair (differs from normal cases where P bears BOP) • Manner of proof: P must establish reasonable standard of care in relevant practice field and geographic area o Expert testimony used if standard not obvious to lay juror • Availability of punitive damages: o Malpractice: NO o Breach of fiduciary duty: YES  Disloyal conduct= true fiduciary claim  Fee discouragement – under the restatement you can be forced to give back to your client fees they’ve paid you on the ground that you have breached a serious duty to the client. it can be a remedy even if the client has not suffered any injury • Lawyer engaging in a clear and serious violation of duty to a client may be required to forfeit some or all of the lawyer’s compensation for the matter o Relevant considerations:  Gravity and timing of the violation  Willfulness 27 . malpractice.

you lose.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. Nagelberg Rule: Actual Innocence Rule: A criminal defendant who files a malpractice claim against her criminal defense attorney must plead and prove that she was exonerated of the criminal conviction Holding: Overcharge for attorney’s fees not barred by actual innocence rule. so excessive fee is one you can maintain even if you had been acquitted o Things like fees are not barred by actual innocence rule. if you’ve done a partial investigation and made a decision off of that then they’ll look more into it A decision in and of itself can be the basis of a Strickland reversal. standard principles of agency law hold that the lawyer must account to the client for the profits earned from the relevant conduct Breach of duty does NOT have to be intentional to warrant disgorgement Criminal Malpractice – different from civil . counsel is effective If it is outside the wide range then you ask to see if the defendant can show prejudice – is there a “reasonable probability” that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors the result would have been different 2 conceptions of what trials are supposed to do – fair trial is one in which evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented to an impartial tribunal for resolution of issues defined in advance of the proceedings (Fair Fight). you have a potential remedy of vacating your conviction and getting a new trial so we don’t need to give you a malpractice remedy . Strickland v Washington – ineffective assistance of counsel Question – what is effective counsel and how do we know if it was effective? Was the conduct outside of the wide range of reasonableness? If the conduct is not outside the wide range of reasonableness. this comes up 28 . the benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trail cannot be relied on as having produced a just result (Right Person) If you’ve done a full investigation.com • • • •  Effect on the value of the lawyer’s work for the client  Any other threatened harm to the client  Adequacy of other remedies Malpractice damages can be greater or smaller than the forfeited fees o Conduct constituting malpractice is not always the same as conduct warranting fee forfeiture  Ex: lawyer’s negligent research is malpractice but would not warrant fee forfeiture Disgorgement less closely associated with loyalty violations o Jurisdictions disagree with whether client seeking disgorgement must show they were harmed by the breach of duty Think of disgorgement in relation to the facts of particular cases o In cases where lawyer deliberately advances self-interest either at the client’s expense or using the client’s information. things like malpractice are W&W v. lawyer cannot be held liable for malpractive for failing to get P acquitted if P of not actually innocent of crime accused.Actual innocence rule – if your counsel is ineffective.The plaintiffs are not complaining the lawyer did a bad job but charged too much. anytime you see one that bad. unlikely to be held incompetent. However. just look at the judgment call.

such a duty would not significantly impair the lawyer’s performance of obligations to the client. the nonclient is not.com LIABILITY TO NON-CLIENTS §51 DUTY OF CARE TO CERTAIN NONCLIENTS For purposes of liability under §48. executor. under applicable tort law. too remote from the lawyer to be entitled to protection (3) to a nonclient when and to the extent that: a. the lawyer’s client is a trustee. guardian. the lawyer knows that a client intends as one of the primary objectives of the representation that the lawyer’s services benefit the nonclient b. (2) to a nonclient when and to the extent that: a. the lawyer knows that appropriate action by the lawyer is necessary with respect to a matter within the scope of the representation to prevent or rectify the breach of a 29 . the absence of such a duty would make enforcement of those obligations to the client unlikely (4) to a non client when and to the extent that: a. the lawyer or (with the lawyer’s acquiescence) the lawyer’s client invites the nonclient to rely on the lawyer’s opinion or provision of other legal services. and b. and the nonclient so relies. or fiduciary acting primarily to perform similar functions for the nonclient b. and c.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. a lawyer owes a duty to use care within the meaning of §52 in each of the following circumstances: (1) to a prospective client. as stated in §15.

the matter is published to a person who may be involved in the proceeding. to enter or dissolve a legal relationship.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. later on another lawyer said that they might have a loss of consortium claim. hospital went too slow with helping him. went to lawyer and lawyer signed up husband as client and said you have a malpractice claim. the nonclient is not reasonably able to protect its rights.com fiduciary duty owed by the client to the nonclient. or if the lawyer acts primarily to help the client obtain a proper adjudication of the client’s claim in that proceeding (3) A lawyer who advises or assists a client to make or break a contract. and the publication has some relation to the proceeding (2) A lawyer representing a client in a civil proceeding or procuring the institution of criminal proceedings by a client is not liable to a non-client for wrongful use of civil proceedings or for malicious prosecution if the lawyer has probable cause for acting. . and c.§51 Meighan v Shore – he had heart attack. is not liable to a nonclient for interference with contract or with prospective contractual relations or with a legal relationship. §58 VICARIOUS LIABILITY (1) a law firm is subject to civil liability for injury legally caused to a person by any wrongful act or omission of any principal or employee of the firm who was acting in the ordinary course of the firm’s business or with actual or apparent authority (2) Each of the principals of a law firm organized as a general partnership without limited liability is liable jointly and severally with the firm (3) A principal of the law firm organized other than as a general partnership without limited liability as authorized by law is vicariously liable for the acts of another principal or employee of the firm to the extent provided by law. the publication occurs in communications preliminary to a reasonably anticipated proceeding before a tribunal or in the institution or during the course and as a part of such a proceeding b. §56 LIABILITY TO A CLIENT OR NONCLIENT UNDER GENERAL LAW Except as provided in §57 and in addition to liability under §48-55. or to enter or not enter a contractual relation. such a duty would not significantly impair the performance of the lawyer’s obligations to the client. where (i) the breach is a crime or fraud or (ii) the lawyer has assisted or is assisting the breach c. a lawyer is subject to liability to a client or nonclient when a nonlawyer would be in similar circumstances §57 NONCLIENT CLAIMS – CERTAIN DEFENSES AND EXCEPTIONS TO LIABILITY (1) in addition to other absolute or conditional privileges. a lawyer is absolutely privileged to publish matter concerning a nonclient if: a. the lawyer participates as counsel in that proceeding. if the lawyer acts to advance the client’s objectives without using wrongful means.Court held the lawyer was not allowed to keep the loss of consortium claim to himself even if he did not want to act on it he must inform the client and clients wife 30 . Duties To Parties Related to Client . and d.

) • Lawyer owes duty to and may be sued by third party in all of the above cases • Notion of fraud very important o “When attorney undertakes to represent the guardian of an incompetent. Client’s status as one who acts on behalf of and for the benefit of a third party a. (Tactic: document it and get out. etc. he assumes a relationship with the guardian and ward. Ex: opinion letter  opinion letter unambiguously creates duties because lawyer inviting reliance 2. Lawyer invites a third party to rely on the lawyer a. do not want to be in situation of someone stealing $ from beneficiaries. imposition of duty would not impair lawyer’s obligation to client. executors  client owes fiduciary duty to third party (office of the trustee) you do not represent the person. May arise regardless if client intends lawyer to act for third party where third party cannot protect own rights c. Some jurisdictions have pass through that says if you see the trustee looting or doing something bad. Based on client’s intention—lawyer owes duty to third party when lawyer knows that the client intends the lawyer’s services to benefit the third party. and absence of duty would make it unlikely the third party could enforce the lawyer’s obligations to the client a. 3 types: 1. If her lawyer sees Billy Ray taking Miley’s $$ he had a duty to tell her dad to stop committing crime.  Issues with how far courts will go with expansion  Some courts hold trustee under no duty to disclose privileged communications relating to trust administration to beneficiaries  Court argued that attorney only represented trustee and NOT beneficiaries 31 . Ex: clients who act as trustees. it must inform beneficiaries if conflict of interest arises. you have obligation to stop them because your duty passes through to beneficiaries d. Ex: client retains a lawyer to draft a will leaving assets to third party 3. Ex: Miley Cyrus  Billy Ray has control of her accounts.com Determination of Whether Lawyer will be held Liable is done under these Policy Factors: 1) the extent to which the transaction was intended to affect the 3rd party 2) Foreseeability of harm to 3rd party 3) Certainty that 3rd party suffered injury 4) Closeness of connection between respondent’s conduct and injury 5) Policy of preventing future harm 6) Whether recognition of liability under the circumstances would impose an undue burden on the profession Turns on privity Also think about the fact that it’s a community property state so whatever money she got.”  owes both fiduciary duty o Hypo: if layer represents trustee and bank.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. you represent the function b. he would have gotten too so should have recommended that for him as your client Foreseeability here about as easy as it is on proximate cause Different here from Nichols and Keller is here you were doing a full job for someone. there you were doing a partial job for them Triangular Duty Relationships: Arises when your representation of a client is related to your client’s relations with some third party in a way that recognizing a duty running from you to the third party advances the purpose of your representation. guardians.

1 . Make other statements prohibited by law.§§56. guardian. the successor trustee controls the privilege regarding communications between counsel and the predecessor trustee in his capacity as trustee  Duty to beneficiary cannot be assumed in situation in which the interests of the fiduciary and beneficiary are adverse  If beneficiary loses assets due to lawyer’s mistake lawyer is liable VS. he is not liable for beneficiaries that may incidentally lose assets Family relationship no defense to misconduct. unless disclosure is prohibited. Negligence in reliance upon a misrepresentation is not a defense where the misrepresentation was intentionally made to induce reliance upon it. elderly) by virtue of representing a client with respect to their duties to the 3rd party. Restatement § 98: Statements to a Non-client A lawyer communicating on behalf of a client with a nonclient may not: 1. if lawyer modifies trust to benefit trustee. then hangs himself. Fail to make a disclosure of information required by law. You may as a lawyer create a duty to a 3rd party thru invitation.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. now I can be sued for $3 million that he owed even though he told me I didn’t need to search. 2. client retains letter for purpose of conferring benefit on 3rd party Status cases is where the status creates a duty (guardian. OR 2. 98 Model Rule §4. Make a false statement of material fact or law to a third party. the way to vindicate their reliance interest is giving them a cause of action against you Clients intention is like third party benefit. and must take pains to avoid negligent misrepresentation Secondary Liability Aiding and Abetting – sometimes you just help people commit unlawful acts Reynolds v. I wrote letter that says I did search when I did not. even if the attorney is negotiating at arm’s length.com • Duties run to successor fiduciary of trust—when one trustee replaces another. minor. Holding: URS owed opposing counsel a duty of care to abstain from misrepresentation and deceit. Shrock Rule: A lawyer may not be held jointly liable with a client for the client’s breach fiduciary duty unless the third party shows that the lawyer was acting outside the scope of the attorney-client relationship 32 .MR 4. A promise made without any intention to perform constitutes actionable fraud. you will be liable for family member’s misrepresentation o Hypo: Brother in law lies. a lawyer shall not knowingly: 1. Knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to the nonclient.do not rely on things family members tell you without double checking them.  Misrepresentation . you may have duty to that 3rd party now Cicone v URS Rule: Duty is owed by attorney not to defraud another. Fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client. Attorney must not engage in deceit. OR 3.1: Truthfulness in Statements to Others In the course of representing a client. give them reason to rely upon you by something such as an opinion letter. you invite someone to rely on you.

§95 AN EVALUATION UNDERTAKEN FOR A THIRD PERSON (1) In the furtherance of the objectives of a client in a representation. Sarantos – helps with criminal cases Rule: Lawyers cannot escape criminal liability on a plea of ignorance when they have shut hteir eyes to what was plainly to be seen.3 ways persons acting in concerts may be held accountable for each other’s tortuous conduct: . constitutes a breach of duty to the third person MR 2. information relating to the evaluation is otherwise protected by Rule 1. the lawyer must exercise care with respect to the nonclient to the extent stated in §51(2) and not make false statements prohibited under §98.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. (3) In providing the information. a lawyer may provide to a nonclient the results of the lawyer’s investigation and analysis of facts of the lawyer’s professional evaluation or opinion on the matter. US v. or opinion under Subsection (1) is reasonably likely to affect the client’s interests materially and adversely. MR 1. If a reasonable man who knew what a lawyer knew would 33 . scope.3 EVALUATION FOR USE BY THIRD PERSONS (a) A lawyer may provide an evaluation of a matter affecting a client for the use of someone other than the client if the lawyer reasonably believes that making the evaluation is compatible with other aspects of the lawyer’s relationship with the client (b) When the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the evaluation is likely to affect the client’s interests materially and adversely.com Holding: No evidence existed to show the lawyer acted outside scope of laywer-client relationship. the lawyer must first obtain the client’s consent after the client is adequately informed concerning the important possible effects on the client’s interests. (c) Except as disclosure is authorized in connection with a report of an evaluation. separately considered. evaluation. As default matter restatement thinks if you help someone commit a tortuous act. or assist a client.For harm resulting to a third party from the tortuous conduct of another. one is subject to liability if he: (a) does a tortuous act in concert with the other or pursuant to a common design with him. the lawyer shall not provide the evaluation unless the client gives informed consent. or gives substantial assistance to the other in accomplishing a tortuous result and his (c) own conduct. you are an aider and abettor .2(d) SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION AND ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN CLIENT AND LAWYER (d) A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage. (2) When providing the information. or (b) knows that the other’s conduct constitutes a breach of duty and gives substantial assistance or encouragement to the other so to conduct himself. evaluation or opinion under Subsection (1). but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity. meaning or application of the law.6. in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com have inquired further and discovered illegal activity, then the lawyer is an aider and abettor. Deliberate effort to avoid guilty knowledge is all the guilty knowledge the law requires Holding: Lawyer found to have deliberately avoided acquiring unpleasant knowledge. In re matter of Scionti RULE - Lawyer may counsel a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning, and application of law and may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law on a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists, however belief must have merit and be reasonable under circumstances.

ASSUMING DUTIES MR 1.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS: SPECIFIC RULES

(a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless: (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing in a manner that can be reasonably understood by the client (2) the client is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice of independent legal counsel on the transaction and (3) the client gives informed consent, in a writing signed by the client, to the essential terms of the transaction and the lawyer’s role in the transaction, including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction (b) A lawyer shall not use information relating to representation of a client to the disadvantage of the client unless the client gives informed consent, except as permitted or required by these rules (c) A lawyer shall not solicit any substantial gift from a client, including a testamentary gift, or prepare on behalf of a client an instrument giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer any substantial gift unless the lawyer or other recipient of the gift is related to the client. For purposes of this paragraph, related persons include a spouse, child, grandchild, parent, grandparent, or other relative or individual with whom the lawyer or the client maintains a close, familial relationship. (d) Prior to the conclusion of representation of a client, a lawyer shall not make or negotiate an agreement giving the lawyer literary or media rights to a portrayal or account based in substantial part on information relating to the representation (e) A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation, except that: (1) A lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter, and (2) A lawyer representing an indigent client may pay court costs and expenses of litigation on behalf of the client (f) A lawyer shall not accept compensation for representing a client from one other than the client unless: (1) The client gives informed consent (2) There is no interference with the lawyer’s independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship, and (3) Information relating to representation of a client is protected as required by Rule 1.6 (g) A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients, or in a criminal case an aggregated agreement as to guilt or nolo contendere pleas, unless each client gives informed consent,

34

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com in a writing signed by the client. The lawyer’s disclosure shall include the existence and nature of all the claims or pleas involved and of the participation of each person in the settlement A lawyer shall not (1) Make an agreement prospectively limiting the lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice unless the client is independently represented in making the agreement, or (2) Settle a claim or potential claim for such liability with an unrepresented client or former client unless that person is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advice of independent legal counsel in connection therewith A lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation the lawyer is conducting or the client except that the lawyer may: (1) acquire a lien authorized by law to secure the lawyer’s fee or expenses, and (2) contract with a client for a reasonable contingent fee in a civil case A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced Whole lawyers are associated in a firm, a prohibition in the forgoing paragraphs (a) through (a) that applies to any one of them shall apply to all of them

(h)

(i)

(j) (k)

§14

FORMATION FO A CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP

A relationship of client and lawyer arises when: (1) a person manifests to a lawyer the person’s intent that the lawyer provide legal services for the person and either a. the lawyer manifests to the person consent to do so, or b. the lawyer fails to manifest lack of consent to do so, and the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the person reasonably relies on the lawyer to provide the services, or (2) a tribunal with power to do so appoints the lawyer to provide the services

§15

A LAWYER’S DUTIES TO A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT (1) When a person discusses with a lawyer the possibility of their forming a client-lawyer relationship for a matter and no such relationship ensues, a lawyer must: a. Not subsequently use or disclose confidential information learned in the consultation, except to the extent permitted with respect to confidential information of a client or former client as stated in §61-67, b. Protect the person’s property in the lawyer’s custody as stated in §44-46 and c. Use reasonable care to the extent the lawyer provides the person legal services (2) A lawyer subject to Subsection (1) may not represent a client whose interests are materially adverse to those of a former prospective client in the same or a substantially related matter when the lawyer or another lawyer whose disqualification is imputed to the lawyer under §123 and 124 has received from the prospective client confidential information that could be significantly harmful to the prospective client in the matter, except that such a representation is permissible if: a. (i) any personally prohibited lawyer take reasonable steps to avoid exposure to confidential information other than information appropriate to determine whether to represent the prospective client and (ii) such lawyer is screened as stated in §124(2)(b) and (c), or b. Both the affected client and the prospective client give informed consent to the representation under the limitations and conditions provided in §122.

35

Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com

Think of duties in the same way you think of the bundle of rights in property, you can assume one of them or all of them but you don’t necessarily have to assume all to assume one Duty of confidentiality: Begins when L accepts confidential information from C DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY Confidences received from prospective clients who don’t hire you: o Must keep information received during client “beauty shopping” confidential o Risk is that this may disqualify you from future work - Checklist: (i) Does lawyer owe client duty; (ii) Can lawyer be DQ’d from representing adverse client?; (iii) If lawyer does anything to hurt client, can they be sued civilly? RULE FOR CONFLICTS: When you have confidential information from client, you may not be adverse to former client on matter substantially related to representation, and may not be adverse to current client at all Bridge Products v. Quantum Chemical - Can you be disqualified because of confidences from non-clients? Yes. Internet Communications Barton v. USDC Rule: Client’s communication is confidential to lawyer if made in course of relationship. IT is not required that lawyer agree to represent client at time communication is made, extends to preliminary consultation  necessary as policy because potential clients must be able to tell lawyers their private business without fear of disclosure Holding: Communications made in questionnaire are confidential and cannot be accessed by others Confidences from Parties Related to Clients Westinghouse v. Kerr-McGee Rule: o (1) Law Firm cannot represent two clients with conflicting interests, violation of duties o (2) There is no basis for creating separate disqualification rules for large firms even though the burden of complying with ethical considerations will naturally fall more heavily upon their shoulders Holding: The fact that 2 contrary undertakings by law firm occurred contemporaneously with each involving substantial stakes and substantially related to the other outbalances the client’s interest in continuing with the chosen attorney DUTY OF CARE Togstad - Lawyer tells her that he said he didn’t think they had a legal case but would talk about it with his partner, he says that he told her that there was nothing in her facts that his firm was interested in undertaking Duty of care: Begins when L renders advice to C

36

1-7. Limitations on ability to form duties or refuse to form duties 37 . Alternative Funding Mechanisms (Civil Only) . that is wrong. the explicit prohibition against such conduct is constitutional and the lawyer is subject to discipline.1 – No Lying . when he renders legal opinion.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com Rule: When an attorney is consulted about whether he will take a case. However. duty of care attaches to advice the attorney gives. 7.MR 1.MR 7. First thing you do before you give advice or before you find out any confidential information you ask who are the adverse parties (ALL of them). initial impulse is to try to reel them in. he can refuse without duty attaching.MR 7. Smolen Rule: Lawyer can only loan money to client to cover litigation and court costs Holding: Because of potential ethical problems that could arise from a lawyer advancing clients money for living expenses.3 – No for-profit solicitation Communication is a generalized expression that outs your services and makes people want to hire you Solicitation is inside of that Basic rule is neither of those can be misleading Public interest lawyers get a lot of leeway on solicitation/advertisement Solicitation more closely regulated than advertising Written materials get more leeway than verbal pitches Advancing Clients Money .2 – You can advertise but cannot pay for testimonials .Lawyers cannot advance clients cash. to see which lawyer will give them the most money Oklahoma Bar Association v. hang up the phone or ask them to wait in the waiting room check your conflicts data base to see if there are any conflicts with those you obligations too now you can either accept the client or decline the client 2) 3) Advertising and Solicitation – 7. 1 and only one way to take a case and 1 and only one way to get rid of a case and 1 and only one way to leave a firm - 1) you get a call from a prospective client asking for your services.3 . but in some jurisdictions they can direct clients to third party who fund litigation through cash advances o Though misleading because typically the advances do not have to be repaid unless the P borrower receives money from the case.MR. Get a number where you can reach them in 2-3 minutes.8(e) o You may not provide financial assistance to a client before their trial (give them an interest free loan) – basically outlaws auctions by clients.

com MR 1. surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned or incurred. a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interest.16 says that a lawyer shall not represent a client or shall withdraw if the representation will result in violation of model rules or other law Law practice includes everything and in the management of a law practice you shall not unlawfully permit unlawful discrimination in hiring. a lawyer shall continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation. shall withdraw from the representation of a client if (1) the representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law (2) the lawyer’s physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client. 1. (d) Upon termination of representation. promoting. The lawyer may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by other law.16 (b)-(d) DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION (b) Except as stated in paragraph (c).Complainant may establish a prima facie case of discrimination by showing: o (1) He is a member of a protected class o (2) Denied access to/ use of o (3) A place of public accommodation TERMINATING DUTIES MR 1.16(a) DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION (a) Except as stated in paragraph (c). allowing time for employment of other counsel. where representation has commenced. a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if: (1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client (2) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent (3) the client has used the lawyer’s services to perpetuate a crime or fraud (4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement (5) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer’s services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled (6) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client or (7) other good cause for withdrawal exists (c) a lawyer must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating a representation. or (3) the lawyer is discharged. a lawyer shall not represent a client or.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. Nathanson . . When ordered to do so by a tribunal.Rule: Attorney or law office holding itself our as open to the public may not reject a potential client solely on the basis of his gender or some other protected class. discharging or accepting or turning away representation of client Stropnicky v. such as giving reasonable notice to the client. 38 .

The client gives informed consent d. The lawyer reasonably believes the client has used or threatens to use the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime or fraud f. loses its capacity to function as such.com §31 TERMINATION OF A LAWYER’S AUTHORITY (1) A lawyer must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating a representation and with an order of a tribunal requiring the representation to continue. Withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client b.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. a client may discharge a lawyer at any time. or (e) the representation ends as provided by contract or because the lawyer has completed the contemplated services. where representation has commenced. (d) the lawyer dies or becomes physically or mentally incapable of providing representation. in the case of a corporation or similar organization. (3) A lawyer’s apparent authority to act for a client with respect to another person ends when the other person knows or should know of facts from which it can be reasonably inferred that the lawyer lacks actual authority. fraudulent. must withdraw from the representation of a client if: a. The client discharges the lawyer (3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5). a lawyer’s actual authority to represent a client ends when (a) the client discharges the lawyer (b) the client dies or. a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if: a. The representation will result in the lawyer’s violating rules of professional conduct or other law b. The representation has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client or the irreparable breakdown of the client-lawyer relationship i. including knowledge of any event described in Subsection (2). The lawyer’s physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client or c. is disbarred or suspended from practicing law. (2) Subject to Subsection (5). §32 DISCHARGE BY A CLIENT AND WITHDRAWAL BY A LAWYER (1) Subject so Subsection (5). The client fails to fulfill a substantial financial or other obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer’s services and the lawyer has given the client reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the client fulfills the obligation h. or is ordered by a tribunal to cease representing a client. (2) Subject to Subsection (1) and §33. a lawyer may not represent a client or. The client insists on taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or imprudent g. The lawyer reasonably believes withdrawal is required in the circumstances stated in subsection (2) c. The client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal. Other good cause for withdrawal exists 39 . (c) the lawyer withdraws. or in breach of the client’s fiduciary duty e.

It extends the period of time she counts as a client for conflict of interest period and the time she can sue you for malpractice . a lawyer must: a.Sometimes if you’re in front of a tribunal you cannot get out unless the tribunal lets you out Fact you’re going to lose money on a case is not a cause for a withdrawal and it would prejudice your clients because they wouldn’t be able to get any other lawyers and you’ve got a contingent fee 40 . Take no action on behalf of a former client without new authorization and give reasonable notice.com (4) In the case of permissive withdrawal under subsections (3)(f)-(i).Because if you don’t then you continue to owe duties and loyalty and you extend the time which you could be sued for malpractice . Take no unfair advantage of a former client by abusing knowledge or trust acquired by means of the representation Hermine Hanlin v. Fact of termination would not end the malpractice inquiry. surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled. a lawyer must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating representation and with a valid order of a tribunal requiring the representation to continue. Take reasonable steps to convey to the former client any material communication the lawyer receives relating to the matter involved in the representation. . (2) Following termination of representation. §33 A LAWYER’S DUTIES WHEN A REPRESENTATION TERMINATES (1) in terminating a representation. client property and documents (§44-46). conflicts in interest. Observe obligations to a former client such as those dealing with client confidences. to those who might otherwise be misled. its not. Mitchelson . One of the two of you has to declare it over .Your responsibility to make clear to your client when you end representation in some sort of tangible form (letter or e-mail) . Lawyer shall not withdraw from representation until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client. such as giving notice to the client of the termination. and d. and fee collection (§41) b. allowing time for employment of other counsel.Rule: Withdrawing attorney must give a client clear and unambiguous notice of the attorney’s intent to withdraw from representation. a lawyer must take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect the client’s interests. and refunding any advance payment of fee the lawyer has not earned.Holding: Status and scope of attorney client relationship prior to commencement of instant suit are unresolved questions. questions would still remain about lawyers’ handling of termination NOTES . that the lawyer lacks authority to act for the client c.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Unless client thinks the relationship is at an end. a lawyer may not withdraw if the harm that withdrawal would cause significantly exceeds the harm to the lawyer or others in not withdrawing (5) Notwithstanding Subsections (1)-(4).

Lacara . however court would normally not allow lawyer to withdraw on eve of trial when lawyer had notice he was taking on difficult client General Dynamics .Holding: Extra protection afforded to in-house counsel due to extra pressure from company to violate ethical rule.com agreement which entails both the possibility of huge upside and huge downside. all their revenue. or (2) There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client. §121 THE BASIC PROHIBITION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 41 . a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. risk allocation agreement Whiting v. retaliatory discharge claim you can only bring if you can find a way to get around the duty of confidentiality In house attorneys have a problem which is they only have one client to cover all their expenses. a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. or where conflict of interest develops between lawyer and client . not a law office culture Court says they worry that a lawyer who is dependent on a single client is vulnerable to leverage to do the wrong thing because the threat to be fired is a threat to losing all of your income as opposed to a threat to loose just a tiny part of your income More your entire revenue is dependant on one client. but if they’re in house they’re also your employee CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MR 1.7(a) (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b). If lawyer is discharged for following MR he can bring tort claim against employer NOTES: You can bring breach of contract claim.Holding: Lawyer allowed to withdraw because conflict of interest between lawyer and client developed at oral argument.Rule: Withdrawal required when client bringing legal action merely for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring another.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. more vulnerable you are to their influence Advice – diversify your revenue base to make it easier to do the right thing If you’re in house make sure you have a network so you can have a soft landing if you are out of there tomorrow You can fire a lawyer at any time you want. it’s a corporate culture.Rule: In-house counsel can bring discharge tort claim against employer if attorney was discharged for following mandatory ethical obligation prescribed by professional rule or statute . A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client.

Holding: Lawyer concurrently represented both clients and therefore violated duty – withdrawal from representation of client 1 before the hearing of the motion to DQ did not convert concurrent representation into subsequent representation for purposes of assessing conflict To get informed consent you need to explain to a client why it might be bad for them to say yes and why it may be good for them to get another lawyer to advise them. Fireman . by unilaterally converting present client into former client.0 – definitions to know for this section (i) “Reasonable belief” or “Reasonably believes” when used in reference to a lawyer denotes that the lawyer believes the matter in question and that the circumstances are such that the belief is reasonable. A conflict of interest is involved if there is a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer’s own interests or by the lawyer’s duties to another client. or (2) represent one client to assert or defend a claim against or brought by another client currently represented by the lawyer. . a lawyer may not represent a client if the representation would involve a conflict of interest. anything short of that isn’t good enough 42 . §128 REPRESENTING CLIENTS WITH CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN CIVIL LITIGATION Unless all affected clients consent to the representation under the limitations and conditions provided in §122. a former client. Attorney may not avoid breaching duty of loyalty which concurrent representation rule is to avoid.Rule: Attorney who drops one client to take on another violates duty of loyalty. even if the matters are not related.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. a lawyer in civil litigation may not: (1) represent two or more clients in a matter if there is a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of one client would be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer’s duties to another client in the matter. Rule 1.com Unless all affected clients and other necessary persons consent to the representation under the limitations and conditions provided in §122. (e) “Informed Consent” denotes the agreement by a person to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated adequate information and explanation about the material risks of and reasonably available alternatives to the proposed course of conduct There are related and unrelated matters and there are times when you are retained and when you have terminated representation You may not represent a party adverse to your client while you are representing your client You may not represent a client whose interests are adverse if the matter is substantially related to the representation of your former client Concurrent Related unrelated No representation of adverse interests Subsequent No rep on substantially related matters Rep OK absent substantial relationship Conflicts Arising from Concurrent Representation Truck v. or a third person.

Law firm should not seek to compensate one client from the pockets of another NOTES: . a former client. a directly adverse conflict may arise when a lawyer is required to crossexamine a client who appears as a witness in a lawsuit involving another client. as when the testimony will be damaging to the client who is represented in the lawsuit.In Determining whether DISQUALIFICATION is required the courts look at various factors: o (1) the nature of the ethical violation o (2) the prejudice to the parties.Rule: where you have specific representation on specific matters that bracket a time where there is adverse representation when you don’t have any pending IBM matters but you have a history of representing them.Rule: Loyalty to a client is impaired when a lawyer cannot consider.material limitation also creates a conflict . recommend.Rule: Any doubt as to whether a law firm should be disqualified is to be resolved in favor of disqualification. the standard of review is abuse of discretion .With conflicts. Mid-City .Most common remedy is to disqualify attorney from participating in pending litigation and the burden to prove that this should happen is on the moving party . even if they’re discrete can make it so that you are still deemed to represent them Comment 6 to MR 1. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: • There is a significant risk that the representation of 1 or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client. a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. or a third person by a personal interest of the lawyer.Model Rule §1.7(A)(2): Conflict of Interest: Current Clients .That means the judge basically makes a gut call on this and if it looks right or not Limitation on Counsel’s Ability to Represent Zealously . or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client because of the lawyer’s other responsibilities or interests. if they are reasonable in considering you their lawyer in a certain type of work.If from the client’s point of view. including the extent of actual or potential delay in the proceedings o (3) the effectiveness in light of the violations o (4) the public’s perception of the profession 43 .7 (a)(2) . Fiandaca v. Remedies for Concurrent Conflicts .Parties are directly adverse when they sit across the table from one another (P v.Except as provided in (b). . then a series of representations.7 – “Directly Adverse” . D) o “Similarly.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com Which clients are current? If you don’t send a termination letter they’re more likely to be considered current If you don’t do that then there are a couple cases IBM v Levin .Always draw pictures of conflicts . simultaneous representation…” NorthStar v. On the other hand. Cunningham .1. Conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client.

it provides little hope for disqualified counsel MR 6.7(a). When the lawyer knows that the interests of the client may be materially benefited by a decision in which the lawyer participates. The lawyer shall not knowingly participate in a decision or action of the organization: (a) if participating in the decision or action would be incompatible with the lawyer’s obligations to a client under Rule 1. The general rule is adverse positions do not count as adverse positions has an exception (Page 11) 44 . officer or member of a legal services organization. however must have interest or be affected by outcome of litigation • Appealing Disqualification: o Federal law does not allow for interlocutory appeals of disqualification orders as a matter of right  Exception for collateral orders: Those that finally determine claims of right separable from. the lawyer shall disclose that fact but need not identify the client Fiandaca – no conflict on being able to fight zealously for their clients on the fact that the facilities were inadequate.com Standing and Interlocutory Appeal • Some sort of confidential or fiduciary relationship must have existed before a party is entitled to prevail on a motion to disqualify an attorney predicated on the actual or potential disclosure of confidential information o Does not need to be a party. and collateral to. that’s direct adversity as well as a side constraint Positional conflicts are not conflicts because they do not create direct adversity for purposes of Rule 1. MR 6.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. or member of an organization involved in reform of the law or its administration notwithstanding that the reform may affect the interest of a client of the lawyer. notwithstanding that the organization servers persons having interests adverse to a client of the lawyer.3 MEMBERSHIP IN LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION A lawyer may serve as a director. apart from the law firm in which the lawyer practices. or (b) where the decision or action could have a material adverse effect on the representation of a client of the organization whose interests are adverse to a client of the lawyer. but unable to recommend a remedy.4 LAW REFORM ACTIVITIES AFFECTING CLIENT INTERESTS A lawyer may serve as a director. officer. rather than different legal or economic interests. rights asserted in the action and are too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated • USSC has held cases do not fall within this exception in both crim and civil o Alternative method available if controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and immediate appeal from order may materially advance ultimate termination of the litigation  Courts construed this narrowly. They are when a conflict arising from different positions on a legal question.7.

or 2. Subsequent conflicts of interest . When you’re sued for malpractice. who pays? You. whose interests are materially adverse to that person and 2.9 DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent. confirmed in writing (b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client 1. . confirmed in writing (c) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter 1.§132 . or when the information has become generally known.6 and 1. reveal information relating to the representation except as these rules would permit or require with respect to a client.9 (a) MR 1. then you look to 1. do you have to pay them back to BOTH clients? Yep. they can tell it as you were greedy and selling their client down the river.com Research Corp Tech v HP Sometimes if you can persuade a court that if you’re not disloyal in a strong sense and can preserve confidentiality then you might not get thrown off the case.Matters are substantially related if they involve the same transaction or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the client’s position in the subsequent matter.Same matter is easy – can’t switch sides in cases. If you have been found to have engaged in conflicted litigation. Not easy to do but if you can yay In addition to disciplinary consequences.MR 1. suppose you have extensive legal expenses over a disqualification motion. about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.Arising from representation adverse to former clients . use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as those rules would permit or require with respect to a client. or they can tell it and you were trying to be fair to both sides and unable to because you were being pulled in both directions Once representation ends.9 NOTES: Not about loyalty but confidentiality 45 . . a smart plaintiff’s lawyer will tell a story about why you did something.9 .What is substantially related? Substantial relationship test is embodied in 1.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.9(c) that is material to the matter unless the former client gives informed consent.

Courts may decline to allow defendants to waive conflicts. look at elements of causes of action. NPD . prejudice need not be shown .Rule: Factor test to determine whether fiduciary can represent competitors: o (1) Extent to which fiduciary was involved in former client’s affairs o (2) Danger of confidences if revealed o (3) Substantial relationship between former representation and current representation .Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Rule: Appearance of impropriety test is used to determine if a firm should be disqualified where it is very difficult to objectively verify that improper communication has taken place or will take place between lawyers in the firm handling 2 sides Maritrans v. Don’t look at what information you actually have. unless there is some reason to believe that there is harm likely to result on misconduct from the attorney obtaining that information Conflicts in Criminal Cases Wheat v. legitimate theory Sometimes subsequent disqualification cases are not about confidentiality but loyalty (ex: Brennan’s chicken case) you cannot attack your previous work.7 or 1. then you can have a conflict and get disqualified. Pepper . even if confidentiality isn’t the issue Analytica v. is a lender. US .When there is no attorney-client relationship (ex: lawyer sits on the board of directors.Holding: As fiduciary P can be fully enjoined from representing Ms competitors because it would create too great a danger that Ms confidential relationship would be breached Conflicts and Confidences obtained other than through representation Oaks Management v. Superior Court . may you be disqualified? No. all work product. Then see if they overlap. its what information is material to the case Other way: look at legal problem and nature of representation Playbook – a book of a corporation’s policies like “our firm will settle if it falls in this range” or whatever.10 IMPUTATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: GENERAL RULE (a) While lawyers are associated in a firm. and prosecutors may complain of conflicts on the defense side of the case IMPUTATION OF CONFLICTS AND SCREENING MR 1. Then do the exactly the same thing with Matter 2. just doing business transactions) and gets exposed to confidential information and subsequently as a lawyer runs across them adversely.com Look at Matter 1 and say “what are the material facts?” “what other info might be material”. internal set of policies. unless the prohibition is based on a personal interest of the prohibited lawyer and does 46 . none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rules 1.Counsel laboring under an actual conflict of interest that adversely affects their performance are presumed ineffective. jury instructions all of that to look back to figure out the relevant facts. if you switch firms and know stuff about the other firm’s playbook. invests in a company. defenses.9.

the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm. may not represent a private client whose interests are adverse to that person in a matter in which the information could be used to the material disadvantage of that person. a lawyer having information that the lawyer knows is confidential information about a person acquired when the lawyer was a public officer or employee. unless (1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client.12(b) 47 .9 (2) shall not: i.com not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client by the remaining lawyers in the firm. and (2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1. other adjudicative officer or arbitrator may negotiate for private employment as permitted by Rule 1.12(b) and subject to the conditions stated in Rule 1. unless the appropriate gov’t agency gives its informed consent. no lawyer in a firm with which that lawyer is associated may knowingly undertake or continue representation in such a matter unless: (1) the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom.11 SPECIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FOR FORMER AND CURRENT GOV’T OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (a) Except as law may otherwise expressly permit.9(c) and (2) shall not otherwise represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee. (b) When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm.9(c) that is material to the matter (c) A disqualification prescribed by this rule may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. A firm with which that lawyer is associated may undertake or continue representation in the matter only if the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom. to the representation.11 MR 1. (b) When a lawyer is disqualified from a representation under paragraph (a). or ii.6 and 1. a lawyer currently serving as a public officer or employee: (1) is subject to Rules 1. participate in a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially while in private practice or nongovernmental employment. informed in writing. confirmed in writing. the term “confidential government information” means information that has been obtained under governmental authority and which. unless the appropriate government agency gives its informed consent. the government is prohibited by law from disclosing to the public or has a legal privilege not to disclose and which is not otherwise available to the public. a lawyer who has formerly served as a public officer or employee of the gov’t (1) is subject to rule 1. and (2) written notice is promptly given to the appropriate government agency to enable it to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this rule (c) Except as law may otherwise expressly permit. except that a lawyer serving as a law clerk to a judge. (d) Except as law may otherwise expressly permit. As used in this Rule. at the time this Rule is applied. negotiate for private employment with any person who is involved as a party or as lawyer for a party in a matter in which the lawyer is participating personally or substantially.7 and 1.7 (d) The disqualification of lawyers associated in a firm with former or current gov’t lawyers is governed by Rule 1.

charge. Goldberg says you cant on a matter adverse to me and moves to disqualify the firm When the lawyer leaves the firm. and (2) Any other matter covered by the conflict of interest rules of the appropriate government agency Imputation of Knowledge and Screening .If you work directly with the client  disqualified .Holding: Attorney’s presumed possession of confidential information concerning former client should not automatically cause attorney’s former firm to be vicariously DQed where evidence establishes that no one other than the departed attorney had any dealings with client or obtained confidential information Goldberg has an informal discussion with Salomon (or so he thought). your job is to know the scope of your taint. controversy. the term “matter” includes: (1) Any judicial or other proceeding.Rule: Exception to substantial relationship exists where there was no opportunity for confidential information to be divulged . keep it on going as you work. he thought there was no formal representation but not true. claim.§§123-124 Imputation – concept by which information is imputed from lawyers to firms and can limit your mobility in moving from job to job Imputation from Lawyer to Firm . investigation. Goldberg serves Warner/Chappell. then the presumption is gone and the firm can represent the music company Doesn’t go from firms to lawyers 2 ways you can taint a lawyer – When you’re an associate. then later on Salomon wants to represent the music company. request for a ruling or other determination.10-1. application. have a list to know which matters you have confidential information on.11 . Salomon leaves the firm. direct inquiry if they actually have any and if any of that information that applies So if Salomon was the only one that has information and he’s gone and no one else has any information on Goldberg’s situation. arrest or other particular matter involving a specific party or parties. contract. accusation.I you worked on the periphery of the case with little interaction then you will not be DQd unless it is established that you received confidential information One tainted lawyer taints the entire firm to a matter.com (e) As used in this Rule. hard to go back and do it 48 . no matter how big the firm is Goldberg v Warner/Chappell Music .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. he was told things and assumes duty of care and confidentiality. here you’re assuming there’s a substantial relationship and if any of the remaining lawyers have any information. the firm isn’t prohibited unless 1 and 2 are both covered The language in (b)(2) – not talking about substantial relationship test as a proxy if the lawyer has information.MR 1.

Rothert firm who represented ML for 80’s and early 90’s.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. If it’s a 7 person firm where 3/7 are partners and its their biggest client. Aerojet . Have to figure out if representation of a subsidiary company equates to representation of the parent company Then have to figure out monitoring counsel problem – monitor litigation. its almost impossible to think they didn’t talk at all about their biggest client Imputation from Firm to Lawyer . the attorney whose disqualification is sought should carry the burden of proving that he had no exposure to confidential information relevant to the current action while he was a member of the former firm. they’re gonna say what they want to get hired If you’re going to screen (even though you’re not supposed to) you need to be prepared under penalty of perjury something that says “I know I wasn’t supposed to talk to X and I didn’t” Screening also works for support staff Morrison Knudsen – hardest conflicts issue he’d give us on an exam. they make sure they are comfortable with the way litigation is going This means a constant flow of information from the company. talk to witnesses. look at things like the size of the firm. give them one anyway so they know what they’re getting into before they get into it so you’re covered in case they realize the mistake later on because “you didn’t ask for it” isn’t persuasive when you get caught in trouble If the lawyer says “I sat in on a deposition” you need to inquire further and find out whose deposition you sat in on.So in your taint list. if you get a hard one like this then do a timeline to figure out if its concurrent or subsequent conflicts Has to deal with disqualification of Hancock. have to think of things like JDA and their communications.Does not impute conclusively Adams v. the answer to that under some states rules is sometimes If a new firm doesn’t ask for a conflict and screening report. through the insurance company to Hancock who is the monitoring counsel 49 .Rule: Where a substantial relationship between the former firm’s representation of the client and the current lawsuit has been shown. (Discovery allowed only after lawyer has established burden of prima facie showing) Conflicts and the “Common Interest” Exception to Privilege Waiver .Conflicts and Joint Defense Agreements – district court says you need consent from all the JDA members to represent a client adverse to the JDA . include everything to cover your ass .Not an irrebuttable presumption of reimputation on the flip side of the firm based on matters that are not at issue (EX: representing a big client and then go to work for D1 or D2 in the JDA) SCREENING Can you screen a lawyer from a case in order to keep the entire firm from being disqualified? According to the MR no. the person wants to be hired.com Summer works counts and never ends When looking to see if firm remains the taint.

com So this looks hard because no direct conflict problem.0 (e) – Informed Consent (e) “Informed consent” denotes an agreement by a person to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated adequate information and explanation about the material risks of and reasonably available alternatives to the proposed course of conduct. (2) Notwithstanding the informed consent of each affected client or former client. it is a separate entity so you have neither a concurrent client and no subsequent conflict Are we worried about loyalty or confidentiality? We’re worried about the information Hancock got so we’re worried about information flow and confidentiality.Party seeking disqualification must show that the non-attorney expert whose conduct is the basis for the motion actually obtained confidential information o Once the moving party shows this. ask if the people who are making the decisions are the same people Information Transmitted to Non-Lawyers: Expert Witness Problem . the playbook argument says its still useful which demands disqualification Everything is about the parent company. alter ego test. 50 . Informed consent requires that the client or former client have reasonably adequate information about the material risks of such representation to that client or former client. makes no sense 2) unity of interest test – ask if the confidential information is related to the present claim. §122 CLIENT CONSENT TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST (1) A lawyer may represent a client notwithstanding a conflict of interest prohibited by §121 if each affected client or former client gives informed consent to the lawyer’s representation. not the subsidiary 2 tests to figure out if sub and the parent collapse into one 1) apply corporate law. if that set of decisions involves the sub then they count. a lawyer may not represent a client if: a. The representation is prohibited by law. In default.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. that is the type of analysis you can do. the court presumes expert conveyed confidential information to other side and burden shifts to party whose DQ is sough to rebut presumption  Logic: Presumption makes sense only if moving party has no ability to secure the evidence it needs to establish it right to DQ CLIENT CONSENT– parties may consent to conflicted representation. Is the general information something that can be used against the new client? Even though none of the information in the information flow has to do with the exact problem. the rule depends on whether the moving party is able to discover from the expert the contents of her communication with the lawyers for the opposing party o If expert has severed all ties with moving party and refuses to communicate with them. So what addresses that concern? The test that talks about confidentiality is substantial relationship test. Brooklyn Navy Yard. some limits on consent Rule 1. in order to look like a substantial relationship you need to collapse the subsidiary and the parent company. but unless you have to you don’t want to do that test. worried about a set of decisions made by the parent company.

full disclosure. potential. . waiver and consent form was detailed. D agreed not to DQ Heller notwithstanding any adversity that might develop.Rule: Every possible consequence of a conflict does not have to be disclosed for consent ot be valid – consent must be informed and written. client must be advised he has right to obtain independent counsel before giving consent.Holding: DQ motion denied – D consented to Heller’s continued representation of P. Zador gives an example of how to do it right .RARE – WARNING o At the slightest hint of adversity – you must get out Image Technical . One client will assert a claim against the other in the same litigation. or c.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. Superior Court . then with full disclosure to and informed consent of both parties there may be dual representation . In the circumstances. with undivided loyalty to the interests of each of them .com b. Generally: • • Clients opposing each other in litigation cannot consent to have the same lawyer represent each of them Clients otherwise may consent to have their lawyer or former lawyer to undertake a matter of the conflicts rules otherwise would bar her from taking o Consent is limited to situations in which a lawyer reasonably believes he could fulfill his obligations o Consent does not relieve a lawyer of his duties of loyalty and care  Lawyer still owes these. it is not sufficient that both parties be informed of the fact that the lawyer is undertaking to represent both of the. only when you have that can they consent to waive the right Problem that most often arises is representation of people who want to start a company together If you’re working for people who want to consent to conflicted representation. it is not reasonably likely that the lawyer will be able to provide adequate representation to one or more of the clients.Rule: If the conflict is merely.Holding: Firm’s duties to disclose any representation adverse to interest of one party cannot be fulfilled by mentioning in passing participating in a brief contrary to the interest of the client without stating the details of why the interests are contrary.13 51 .Rule: To satisfy the requirement of FULL DISCLOSURE by a lawyer before undertaking to represent 2 conflicting interests. but he must explain to them the nature of the conflict of interest in such detail so that they can understand the reasons why it may be desirable for each to have independent counsel.MR 1. may face civil liability for breach o Consent is only as good as the information on which it is based  A lawyer who does not give the client full information about the nature of a conflict and the advantages and disadvantages of consenting to a conflict may find that courts or disciplinary officials refuse to recognize the consent There has to be informed consent. When adversity did develop D obtained separate counsel but reaffirmed agreement to consent form and to Hellers continued representation of P Waivers Involving Entities and Entity Constituents . you get around getting sued with a good consent document Klemm v. there being no existing dispute or contest between the parties represented as to any point in litigation.

to the essential terms of the transaction and the lawyer’s role in the transaction. including a testamentary gift. or 52 . except as provided or required by these rules. The lawyer’s disclosure shall include the existence and nature of all the claims or pleas involved and of the participation of each person in the settlement.Conflict waivers in such situations must be signed by a representative of the entity other than the representative who will be jointly represented MR 1. grandchild. a lawyer shall not make or negotiate an agreement giving the lawyer literary or media rights to a portrayal or account based in substantial part on information relating to the representation. or prepare on behalf of a client an instrument giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer any substantial gift unless the lawyer or other recipient of the gift is related to the client.com . . unless each client gives informed consent. the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter. (b) A lawyer shall not use information relating to the representation of a client to the disadvantage of the client unless the client gives informed consent. possessory. including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction. (f) A lawyer shall not accept compensation for representing a client from one other than the client unless: (1) the client gives informed consent (2) there is no interference with the lawyer’s independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship. and (2) a lawyer representing an indigent client may pay court costs and expenses of litigation on behalf of the client. if conflict of interest rules permit. familial relationship (d) Prior to the conclusion of representation of a client. child. For purposes of this paragraph. in a writing signed by the client. grandparent or other relative or individual with whom the lawyer or the client maintains a close. parent. except that: (1) a lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS: SPECIFIC RULES (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership. security or other pecuniary interest adverse to client unless: (1) the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing in a manner that can be reasonably understood by the client (2) the client is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advise of independent legal counsel on the transaction.Counsel may represent both the entity and one of its representatives. and (3) information relating to the representation of a client is protected as required by Rule 1. or in a criminal case an aggregated agreement as to guilty or nolo contendere pleas. (c) A lawyer shall not solicit any substantial gift from a client. (h) A lawyer shall not: (1) make an agreement prospectively limiting the lawyer’s liability to a client for malpractice unless the client is independently represented in making the agreement. related persons include spouse. (e) A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation.6 (g) A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients. in a writing signed by the client. and (3) the client gives informed consent.

(k) While lawyers are associated in a firm. secure independent counsel for the insured.Rule: Insurer cannot compel the insured to surrender control of the litigation. OR that you are NOT their lawyer AND are NOT looking out for their interests! Beery v State Bar – . a prohibition in the forgoing paragraphs (a) through (i) that applies to any one of them shall apply to all of them. Otherwise there would have been liability because: 53 .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. . Transactions with Clients – GREAT WAY TO GET DISBARRED Requirements VERY important:  1. and must. Client gives WRITTEN (& signed) INFORMED CONSENT • Must clearly state whether lawyer is representing client in transaction o Lawyer will typically not be representing client  risk that client will not understand this and continue to believe that lawyer is continuing to look out for their interests o Must explicitly confirm with client that you are their lawyer AND looking out for their interests. Franciscan Sisters v Dean – old lady leaves the money to the lawyer.Rule: Business transactions with lawyers scrutinized by courts with care. Lawyer suspended from practice for 3 years. Attorney hold burden of proof to prove transaction was fair. Client must be advised to seek INDEPENDENT COUNSEL • Must demonstrate that you told client this and gave him enough time to do so o Good idea to put this in writing  3. Pacific . set aside at the mere insistence of the client unless the attorney can show by extrinsic evidence that his client acted with full knowledge of all facts connected with the transaction and fully understood their effect. governed under fiduciary law  2.Holding: Lawyer violated rule and abused trust client had in him.P failed to prove proximate cause. and (2) Contract with a client for a reasonable contingent fee in a civil case (j) A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced. Attorney’s primary duty has been said to be to further the best interests of the insured. did impeccable procedure and through that makes it easier to rebut presumption to show that they did it right Relations with Insurers Purdy v. goes and talks to 3rd party lawyer.com (2) settle a claim or potential claim for such liability with an unrepresented client or former client unless that person is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek the advise of independent legal counsel in connection therewith (i) A lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation the lawyer is conducting for a client except that a lawyer may: (1) Acquire a lien authorized by law to secure the lawyer’s fee or expenses. if necessary. . Terms must be FAIR AND REASONABLE • K will be scrutinized for substantive fairness • Not governed under K law. Breached duty to client by failing to disclose highly risky nature of investment.

it depends on what you think the strategy situation of your defendant is. up to them to determine if a conflict of interest will arise or not Series of follow up case. if intentional then insured doesn’t recover and insurer doesn’t have to pay) Question of do you want to plead into insurance or out of it. problem when they’re on opposite sides (ex: if its negligent the insured recovers and insurer has to pay. If defendant doesn’t have enough resources. The duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify – means that the insurance obligation extends to the entire claim even if their obligation extends to only 1/27th of the entire claim. says the district court must be allowed substantial latitude in rejecting conflict of interests. on appeal the defendant is going to make a Strickland claim that will probably win and you will likely have to retry the case which would cost the gov’t time and money So they have standing to prevent the ruling from being tainted by conflict Rule is one of deference to the trial judge. see if you can find an insurance angle What business of the gov’t is it who a criminal defendant has as its representative? Gov’t has standing to raise defense side conflicts Reason you can do this is in the event there is a disabling conflict and you convict the defendant. plead into insurance. Wheat has given rise to fascinating challenges by prosecutors Positional conflicts are not conflicts Nothing permits a lawyer to tell two conflicting stories for each client. and its not reimbursable Defamation = the only part in the claim that was covered by insurance but they had to represent the client in defending against not only that claim but the 26 other claims too If you see something odd (like a defamation claim out of no where). some cause of action you think insurance would cover. you can sort of get the sense though 54 .Downloaded From OutlineDepot.com Correspondence between lawyer and Ds indicates that lawyer is aware of (1) accumulating evidence of Ps responsibility for accident. and (2) potential for an excess verdict and communicated that awareness to D o NOTES: Attorney is technically hired for the defense of the insured. but information gets passed with the insurer and they are hired by the insurer Representation of the insured does not imply representation of the insurance company unless they are a named party Court says when you represent insured you represent the insurer because the insurance company is a client with respect to being able to assert the attorney/client privilege Also looks like more of client of insurer if you get regular work from them Works well when they’re on the same side of an issue.

RULE 3. §100 DEFINITION OF A REPRESENTED NONCLIENT Within the meaning of §99. a represented nonclient includes: (1) a natural person represented by a lawyer. under applicable rules of evidence. unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order. unless: (a) the communication is with a public officer or agency to the extent stated in §101. The lawyer reasonably believes the person’s interests will not be adversely affected by refraining from giving such information §99 A REPRESENTED NONCLIENT – THE GENERAL ANTI-CONTACT RULE (1) a lawyer representing a client in a matter may not communicate about the subject of the representation with a nonclient whom the lawyer knows to be represented in the matter by another lawyer or with a representative of an organizational nonclient so represented as defined in §100. (b) the lawyer is a party and represents no other client in the matter (c) the communication is authorized by law (d) the communication reasonably responds to an emergency. never said active conflicts go to concurrent conflicts. and: (2) a current employee or other agent of an organization represented by a lawyer: a.com Active conflict cases are concurrent representation cases (ex: wheat). The person is a relative or an employee or other agent of the client. or regularly consults with the lawyer concerning the matter or if the agent has power to compromise or settle the matter b. a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter. if the acts or omissions of the employee or other agent may be imputed to the organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability in the matter.4(f) FAIRNESS TO OPPOSING PARTY AND COUNSEL A Lawyer shall not request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant information to another party unless: 1. directs. if a statement of the employee or other agent. if the employee or other agent supervises. or (e) the other lawyer consents (2) Subsection (1) does not prohibit the lawyer from asserting the client in otherwise proper communication by the lawyer’s client with a represented nonclient. no reason to think you’d have one RELATIONS WITH THIRD PARTIES ON BEHALF OF CLIENTS RULE 4.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. and 2. would have the effect of binding the organization with respect to the proof of the matter §102 INFORMATION OF A NONCLIENT KNOWN TO BE LEGALLY PROTECTED 55 .2 COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL In representing a client. or c.

The rule doesn’t say you have to ask if they are represented. In between written script with prepping a client to get on the stand and discussions about what might be discussed. More than a supervisory employee. . depends on client sophistication There has never been a criminal case to suppress evidence as a penalty for a 4. Represented Person May not communicate without lawyer’s consent • Party’s own consent will not do • Exception: good faith under-cover investigation • KNOWLEDGE requirement Unrepresented Persons May communicate If your client’s interests differ from theirs or are reasonably likely to do so. a right that vests in lawyers Your client could consent all day long to talking to counsel for the other side and that amounts to nothing. And unless they have their own lawyer.com A lawyer communicating with a nonclient in a situation permitted under §99 may not seek to obtain information that the lawyer reasonably should know the nonclient may not reveal without violating a duty of confidentiality to another imposed by law. but you can probably employ persons to play the role of customers seeking services on the same basis as the general public. you may not give them legal advice • Exception: tell them to get their own lawyer Snider v. managing agent. NOTES: Not a right that vests in clients. Snyder the case does.2 violation in a federal case MR 8. they sure as hell aren’t represented by the company’s counsel Who is represented by counsel? California rule says: officer. the right is in the lawyer to decide if you can or not What about entities. association member or employee of association if the subject of the suit is the act of that person Everyone else? You as the plaintiff’s atty are free to call and fish information from them .CA RULE: Employee’s admission would be imputed only if the employee had authority to speak on the employer’s behalf (“managing-speaking agent” test)  managing agent is an employee that exercises substantial discretionary authority over significant aspects of a corporation’s business.Who do you talk to? Best choice is someone who just got fired who has a grudge. Superior Court . The reason they say you have to ask because if you don’t ask it can be used against you to say that you knew that they were represented and proceeded to question them anyway You cannot restrict non clients from not speaking to opposing counsel You can’t trick protected employees into doing things or saying things. including organizational policy. there is a range of possibilities. of the real human beings that are members of the entity are considered “represented” for purposes of legal contact? . director. they have a good case of hate and will work toward your profit.**Actual knowledge required before attorney held to violate this rule.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.4 NO CONTACT RULE Prohibits lawyers from using third parties to do things the rules prohibit lawyers from doing themselves 56 . it can be inferred by the circumstance. but knowledge does not require an admission by the lawyer that they knew.

A lawyer may be subject to disciplinary authority of both this jurisdiction and another jurisdiction for the same conduct. the lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding. that attorney’s responsibility is to act on behalf of the client and to protect the client from compromising his case by waiving viable defense or from disclosing privileged information – attorney cannot fulfill this responsibility when opposing counsel freely comes into contact with the client without attorney’s knowledge You can be disciplined by any jurisdiction that licenses you Communication is broadly construed and it doesn’t matter who initiates. it’s a prohibition on communication MR 4.com MR 8. the rules of the jurisdiction in which the lawyer’s conduct occurred. When the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the unrepresented person misunderstands the lawyer’s role in the matter. unless the rules of the tribunal provide otherwise. the rules of the jurisdiction in which the tribunal sits.Rule: Once attorney has been appointed to represent in litigation.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. and (2) when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the unrepresented nonclient misunderstands the lawyer’s role in the matter. and 2) for any other conduct. if the predominant effect of the conduct is in a different jurisdiction. other than the advice to secure counsel. to the prejudice of the nonclient. regardless of where the lawyer’s conduct occurs. In any exercise of disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction. a lawyer shall not state or imply that the lawyer is disinterested. A lawyer shall not be subject to discipline if the lawyer’s conduct conforms to the rules of a jurisdiction in which the lawyer reasonably believes the predominant effect of the lawyer’s conduct will occur. (b) Choice of Law. concerning the identity and interests of the person the lawyer represents. A lawyer not admitted in this jurisdiction is also subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction if the lawyer provides or offers to provide any legal services in this jurisdiction. A lawyer admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction. §103 DEALINGS WITH AN UNREPRESENTED NONCLIENT In the course of representing a client and dealing with a nonclient who is not represented by a lawyer: (1) the lawyer may not mislead the nonclient. if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the interest of such a person are or have a reasonable possibility of being in conflict with the interests of the client. or. the rules of that jurisdiction shall be applied to the conduct. the rules of professional conduct to be applied shall be as follows: 1) for conduct in connection with a matter pending before a tribunal. CHOICE OF LAW (a) Disciplinary Authority. Its not a prohibition on interrogation.3 DEALING WITH UNREPRESENTED PERSON In dealing on behalf of a client with a person who is not represented by counsel. Matter of Howes . The lawyer shall not give legal advice to an unrepresented person. 57 .5 DICIPLINARY AUTHORITY. the lawyer must take reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding when failure to do so would materially prejudice the nonclient.

Rule: Regardless of whether some documents may be ultimately discoverable.Rule: Lawyer should not give advice to unrepresented person other than advice to obtain legal counsel. a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose othern than to embarrass. you must not give them advice but you must tell them to get a lawyer Only advice you may give is get your own lawyer. Schectman . he gave him legal advice when he gave an estimate. they must be returned to their original owner until discovery Embarrassing or Burdening Others Idaho State Bar v.Rule: A lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass.Holding: Conversation should have led attorney to know that his advice would be relied upon by opposing party. go away When you’re at the premises where a person is being held. especially when unrepresented person is not experienced in dealing with legal matters and might assume lawyer is disinterested .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. parties have right to keep their own documents until met with proper discovery requests or ordered to disclose them by Court o Factors requiring return of documents:  Other side benefits from wrongdoing  Sensitive. position . even if you’re doing no business.”  VIOLATION . Lawyer did not only state factual matter to party. or burden a third person.Holding: Even though documents were not subject to attorney-client privilege or work product. or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person (b) A lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer’s client and relating to the representation of the lawyer’s client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender Receiving Evidence Pillsbury v.Opinion: “this case is worth X. delay. or burden a third person  Rule requires demonstration that prosecutor intended to appeal or engender bias RELATIONS WITH YOUR FIRM §9 LAW PRACTICE ORGANIZATIONS – IN GENERAL 58 . Troutner .Position: “my client will offer X.”  NOT VIOLATION MR 4. you are acting in a lawyer duty so consider your actions those of a lawyer and publishable under the rules Distinguish opinion vs. Warrick . delay.4 RESPECT FOR RIGHTS OF THIRD PERSON (a) In representing a client. NOTES: You can listen and you can get facts but you must make sure they know you are not their lawyer.com Hopkins v. confidential info  Improper gathering methods o Exception: Improper evidence OK if justification exists (fear for life) .

Only after the lawyer has adequately and timely informed the firm of the lawyer’s intent to contact firm clients for that purpose. Only with respect to firm clients on whose matters the lawyer is actively and substantially working. The lawyer is a partner or principal in the law firm. with knowledge of the specific conduct. §11 A LAWYER’S DUTY OF SUPERVISION (1) A lawyer who is a partner in a law-firm partnership or a principal in a law firm organized as a corporation or similar entity is subject to professional discipline for failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to applicable lawyer-code requirements. (2) A lawyer who has direct supervisory authority over another lawyer is subject to professional discipline for failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other lawyer conforms to applicable lawyer-code requirements. as an employee of another lawyer or law firm. or ii. That conduct of a nonlawyer over whom the lawyer has direct supervisory authority is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer. That the firm in which the lawyer practices has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the nonlawyer’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer. Prior to leaving the firm i. with knowledge of the specific conduct ratifies the conduct. or has direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer. professional corporation.1 RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNERS. ratifies the conduct involved. MANAGERS. and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial measures.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. and ii. and b. and ii. operation. shall make reasonable efforts to 59 . and i. After ceasing employment in the firm. (2) A lawyer employed by an entity described in Subsection (1) is subject to applicable law governing the creation. The lawyer fails to make reasonable efforts to ensure: i. AND SUPERVISORY LAWYERS (a) A partner in a law firm.com (1) A lawyer may practice as a solo practitioner. The nonlawyer’s conduct would be a violation of the applicable lawyer code if engaged in by a lawyer. a lawyer leaving a law firm may solicit firm clients: a. and a lawyer who individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial authority in a law firm. The lawyer orders or. to the extent as any other nonfirm lawyer. or has direct supervisory authority over the other lawyer. The lawyer orders or. the lawyer is subject to professional discipline if either: a. or as a member of a law firm constituted as a partnership. management and dissolution of the entity. or similar entity. or b. and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial measures (4) With respect to a nonlawyer employee of a law firm. The lawyer is a partner or principal in the law firm. MR 5. (3) Absent an agreement with the firm providing a more permissive rule. (3) A lawyer is subject to professional discipline for another lawyer’s violation of the rules of professional conduct if: a. or b.

2 RESPONSIBILITIES OF A SUBORDINATE LAWYER (a) A lawyer is bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct notwithstanding that the lawyer acted at the direction of another person (b) A subordinate lawyer does not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct if that lawyer acts in accordance with a supervisory lawyer’s reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty. and to remind client of its freedom to retain counsel of choice.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Holding: Lawyer suspended for 2 years: o Mitigating factors:  Did not intend to mislead  Resolved money  Had not been previously disciplined Not Mitigating:    Mobile Lawyers Basic Restrictions Horowitz v.Rule: Departing partner may inform client with whom they have a prior professional relationship about impending withdrawal. P must plead and prove that D induced an at will employee to leave. disclosure. and accounting to each other. and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action. Soliciting Former Clients and Colleagues . or has direct supervisory authority over the other lawyer. Hanlon Rule: To recover for interference with at will employment K. Moskowitz .Rule: Lawyers in partnership have fiduciary duties of loyalty. new practice. Intention to defraud not required . MR 5.§9 Reeves v. ratifies the conduct involved. Fiduciary Responsibility to Firm In re Curran . and abandoning firm on short notice. lying to partners about plans to leave. with knowledge of the specific conduct. Departing partner may not lure clients to new association by lying about client to rights with respect to choice of counsel.com ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the Rules of Professional Conduct (b) A lawyer having direct supervisory authority over another lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other lawyer conforms to the Rules of Professional Conduct (c) A lawyer shall be responsible for another lawyer’s violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if: (1) the lawyer orders or. or (2) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable managerial authority in the law firm in which the other lawyer practices. requires more than merely extending job offer to employee that induces employee Other partners doing same thing Though he had earned money Tried to make excuses o 60 .

MR 5. as an agent of your firm.Rule: Agreement among partners imposing reasonable cost on departing partners who compete with law firm in a limited geographical area is not inconsistent with MR and is not void on its face as against public policy .Holding: Departing partners may compete but then will not receive excess retirement pay – interest of public is served by allowing counsel to continue to practice in field while still protecting firms by placing a reasonable price on competition MR 8. Agreements on Restricting Practice . shall inform the appropriate professional authority. operating.3 REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty. You owe fiduciary duties to your firm. trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. Babcock .Downloaded From OutlineDepot. the duty of care requires you to get it 61 . (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. or (b) an agreement in which a restriction on the lawyer’s right to practice is part of the settlement of a client’s controversy.PAGE 74 of other outline MR 5. except an agreement concerning benefits upon retirement. May offer better contract terms but may not perform independently wrongful act. employment. as well as to your client You must discharge both sets of duties simultaneously For purposes of discipline (but not malpractice liability) you may rely on reasonable judgment calls of supervising attorneys If you need supervision or assistance of a more experienced attorney to discharge your duty of care to a client.com to terminate at will employment. o May not use trade secret client data in improper manner to directly solicit clients for D’s gain/P’s detriment if not in furtherance of right to engage in fair competition.§13 Howard v.6 or information gained by a lawyer or judge while participating in an approved lawyer’s assistance program. shareholders. (c) This Rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 RESTRICTIONS ON RIGHT TO PRACTICE A lawyer shall not participate in offering or making: (a) a partnership. or other similar type of agreement that restricts the right of a lawyer to practice after termination of the relationship. Holding: Punitive damages owed for disrupting business and violating trade secret problem Trade Secrets Problem .6 .

com Future representation agreements – a way to buy off a firm from being in future representation against a same company Superior-Subordinate Relations – PAGE 75 OTHER OUTLINE Kramer v.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.Rule: Lawyer liable for employees mistake if he ratified it. or was negligent in failing to ensure associate was doing work in compliance with rules . you have to make a pitch to the boss and say this is against your own self interest by the rules if you’re going to prejudice the client. equal employment opportunity commission said that looked like age discrimination. they had a policy of basically kicking partners into semi inactive status when they got to be a certain age to make room for new partners. redirect your boss’s energy and turn it all into their idea The model rules are relatively clear that the rules apply to all of us.Holding: Employer must present evidence whether (1) Partner ratified associate’s negligence. say there’s all these partners but there’s a committee that runs things. its highly unlikely recognizing obligations from the lawyer to the firm will create a conflict since both entities owe these obligations to the client. junior has no experience. but the firm’s first priority is to get paid and might say “until I get paid no more work” and then you’re not doing good for your client What do you do there? The rules don’t tell you. incompetent to just assume someone is looking over your shoulder without actually knowing for sure if someone is duty to seek supervision exists conventional distinction between partners and associates. eeoc only applies to employees look at reality of practice. they say no. work pro bono on the weekend. only thing we get as junior associates is respondeat superior and reasonable determinations by senior lawyers 1. Nowak . Why is Kramer doing this? To go after Nowak rather than claiming it on his own insurance Pollack – the firm owes fiduciary obligations to the client. Give notice to your client to say “you have X days to get the money to us or we will discontinue representation”. she assumed that someone was watching and looking at the work you still have to satisfy your duty of care. (2) whether miscalculation of prejudgment interest could have been discovered through reasonable inquiry Are you responsible for malpractice to your employer? Yes. you get a note from the committee that tells you what they’ve decided to do with you 62 . tort law applies to all of us. 1000 lawyer firm. the lawyer owes fiduciary obligations to the client. they’re partners. breach your duties. so no harm in saying owe a duty to the firm and owe a duty to the client because those will never be in conflict That is legally correct.1 says we shall be competent big partner takes a junior associate along to a client and says we’re the best franchising law firm. passes off the client to the junior who says they don’t know what they’re doing and the senior says “research it”. the partner has all these hours of work.

the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved. charge. is the firm liable for something he did for a criminal case – Depends on how you hold yourself out as and the degree to which you do that to – When the retainer agreement is on the firm letterhead.2(b) is a defense to discipline on 2 conditions 1) question must be arguable 2) instruction must be reasonable Not a defense to tort law or contract law He loses b/c court doesn’t think the question is arguable if its communication or not Activities outside the Firm – What is in the Scope and Course of Employment Shapiro . before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation. .5. that’s when the association seems to be crystal clear ECONOMICS OF PRACTICE MR 1.com Howes – got a call from a criminal defendant but said he didn’t do anything wrong b/c all he did was listen and said that wasn’t communicating. and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly 2) the likelihood.Where employee conducting own business with that of employer.Downloaded From OutlineDepot.2(b) that says a subordinate does not violate the rules if they act in accordance with a supervisory lawyer’s reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty . or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. preferably in writing. except when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the 63 . The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following 1) the time and labor required. if apparent to the client.Rule: To be liable for employee’s act. tortious conduct must be generally foreseeable consequence of employer’s activity  foreseeability means that in the context of the particular enterprise. inquiry required as to which business he was engaged in at time of inquiry – He worked for a civil firm and did criminal work on the side. an employee’s conduct is not so unnatural or startling that it would seem unfair to include the loss resulting from it among other costs of the employer’s business. that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer 3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services 4) the amount involved and results obtained 5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances 6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client 7) the experience.5 FEES (a) A lawyer shall not make an agreement for. and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing services 8) whether the fee is fixed contingent (b) The scope of the representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses for which the client will be responsible shall be communicated to the client. reputation. Then said I’m a subordinate lawyer under 5.

Remains property of client until attorney applies it to charges for services actually rendered c. the payment or amount of which is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or upon the amount of alimony or support. and whether such expenses are to be deducted before or after the contingent fee is calculated. including the share each lawyer will receive. if there is a recovery. except in a matter in which a contingent fee is prohibited by paragraph (d) or other law. the lawyer shall provide the client with a written statement stating the outcome of the matter and. Any unearned funds returned to client d. (c) A fee may be contingent on the outcome of the matter for which the service is rendered. will presume any advance fee is a deposit from which attorney will be paid for specific legal services i. Money given as retainer is not present payment for future services i. litigation and other expenses to be deducted from the recovery.com same basis or rate. Upon conclusion of a contingent fee matter. or (2) a contingent fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case (e) A division of a fee between lawyers who are not in the same firm may be made only if: (1) the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation (2) the client agrees to the arrangement. trial or appeal. must describe in writing the nature of the benefit being provided to a specific client f. and (3) the total fee is reasonable. charge or collect: (1) any fee in a domestic relations matter. ct. Put this in your account to ensure client has enough $ to pay you at any given time b. Default is security retainer. If money is yours (true retainer) client has no entitlement to it and you do not have to place it into client trust account i. The agreement must clearly notify the client of any expenses for which the client will be liable whether or not the client is the prevailing party. (d) A lawyer shall not enter into an agreement for. Any changes in the basis or rate of the fee or expenses shall also be communicated to the client. Can put it in your account or firm’s account (2) Security Retainer a. Provides benefit to client where it guarantees attorney will make themselves available to client and forego other employment opportunities as result of time commitments/ conflicts d. and the agreement is confirmed in writing.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. including the percentage or percentages that shall accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement. Retainer held by attorney to secure payment of fees for future services that the attorney is expected to render i. showing the remittance to the client and the method of its determination. Attorney may not treat fee as earned simply by labeling it earned on receipt or referring to it as engagement retainer. Types of Fees Three types of retainers (1) Classic/ True Retainer a. Lawyer may also accept fee for placing client’s work at top of attorney’s priority list e. or property settlement in lieu thereof. A contingent fee agreement shall be in a writing signed b the client and shall state the method by which the fee is to be determined. Entitlement to fee exists whether or not the services are ever rendered c. Unless fee agreement expressly states that fee is an engagement retainer and explains how fee is earned upon receipt. not true retainer 64 . Payment of sum to secure availability over period of time b.

FEE DIVISION Arthur Chambers v. Attorney may not label advance fees non-refundable because it misleads client. must take them out of client trust acct as you earn them  Ethically required to withdraw money as soon as you reasonably can o Must deliver goods promptly to client if they ask for it o Must tell client how much money/property you are holding for them or what you have done with it o Must account for all money to state Bar if they inquire o For at least 5 years. on receipt Firm or lawyer’s account Security Retainer Provide lawyer assurance that money will be there when earned Client. o Must promptly notify client when you receive goods on their behalf o Account must be in CA unless client consents in writing o Must identify property received on behalf of writing and immediately put them into safe deposit box/ place of safekeeping o NO COMMINGLING: depositing money that belongs to firm into client trust acct. must keep complete records of all client $ entrusted to you Purpose Belongs to Deposit in True Retainer Secure availability (no work required) Lawyer. May NOT suggest advance fees are non-refundable! i.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. Only true retainers belong to lawyer on receipt f. lawyer takes only when earned Trust account only Advance Payment Pay lawyer up front for work to be performed later (may be flat fee or partial fee) Jurisdictions differ. Differs from security retainer in that ownership of funds is intended to pass to attorney at time of payment d.will not realize he can fire attorney and still get $ back (3) Advance Payment Retainer a.com K term stipulating that payment is earned on receipt is not effective if the payment is for the lawyer’s work in a particular matter rather than simply to secure lawyer’s availability i. Very common for criminal defense attorneys – want to be paid up front because odds are that client is going to prison and then he would not have incentive to pay you b. that is clearly labeled as client trust bank acct. Philip Kay -RULE: Lawyer may not divide a fee for legal services unless written disclosure and consent from client is obtained.Lawyer in CA Jurisdictions differ. When lawyer receives money (ie: settlement award) lawyer must notify client and any third person with interest (creditor of client) and deliver to that party any money they are entitled to receive • Trust Account Basics: o All funds you receive/ hold for client must be deposited into bank acct. Client has right to know how attorneys fees will be determined and basis for sharing fees by attorneys.advisable only in trust in all jurisdictions e. Must keep down to $ record of what went in and came out. Cannot K around default retainer rules ii. not allowed!  When you earn fees. 65 . Every fee is refundable as long as it is not entirely earned e.must always balance account • Courts look to language of retainer to ascertain what type it is – look beyond the name of the retainer • Notes re Model Rules: o 1. Agreement where client pays in advance for some or all of services that attorney is expected to perform on client’s behalf c.

a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests. Contingent on a specified result in a divorce proceeding or a proceedings concerning custody of a child (2) Unless the contract construed in the circumstances indicates otherwise. a lawyer shall promptly notify the client or third person. Complete records of such account funds and other property shall be kept by the lawyer and shall be preserved for a period of [five years] after termination of the representation (b) A lawyer may deposit the lawyer’s own funds in a client trust account for the sole purpose of paying bank service charges on that account. allowing time for employment of other counsel. The lawyer shall promptly distribute all portions of the property as to which the interests are not in dispute. a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and. (c) A lawyer shall deposit into a client trust account legal fees and expenses that have been paid in advance. shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property (e) When in the course of representation a lawyer is in possession of property in which two or more persons (one of whom may be the lawyer) claim interests. when a lawyer has contracted for a contingent fee. Funds shall be kept in a separate account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s office is situated.com RULE 1. to be withdrawn by the lawyer only as fees are earned or expenses incurred. upon request by the client or third person. §34 REASONABLE AND LAWFUL FEES A lawyer may not charge a fee larger than is reasonable in the circumstances or that is prohibited by law. Contingent on success in prosecuting or defending a criminal proceeding. Other property shall be identified as such and appropriately safeguarded. the lawyer is entitled to receive the specified fee only when and to the extent the client receives payment. or b.16(d) DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION (d) Upon termination of representation. (d) Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest. §35 CONTINGENT-FEE ARRANGEMENTS (1) A lawyer may contract with a client for a fee the size or payment of which is contingent on the outcome of a matter. 66 . the property shall be kept separate by the lawyer until the dispute is resolved. The lawyer may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by other law. or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person. RULE 1. Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the client.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. but only in an amount necessary for that purpose. unless the contract violates §34 or another provision of this Restatement or the size of payment of the fee is: a.15 SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY (a) a lawyer shall hold property of clients or third persons that is in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from the lawyer’s own property. such as giving reasonable notice to the client. surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned or incurred.

the repayment of which to the lawyer may be contingent on the outcome of the matter (3) A lawyer may not. a lawyer may not charge separately for the lawyer’s general office and overhead expenses b. a lawyer must communicate to the client. and b. the client may avoid it unless the lawyer shows that the contract and the circumstances of its formation were fair and reasonable to the client. before the lawyer ceases to represent a client. any other threatened or actual harm to the client. may be enforced by either party if the contract meets other applicable requirements. except that a. §37 PARTIAL OR COMPLETE FORFEITURE OF A LAWYER’S COMPENSATION A lawyer engaging in clear and serious violation of duty to a client may be required to forfeit some or all of the lawyer’s compensation for the matter. and c. payments that the law requires an opposing party or that party’s lawyer to pay as attorney-fee awards or sanctions are credited to the client.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. If the contract or modification is made beyond a reasonable time after the lawyer has begun to represent the client in the matter (see §38(1). not the client’s lawyer. when a lawyer requests and receives a fee payment that is not for services already rendered. unless the communication is unnecessary for the client because the lawyer has previously represented that client on the same basis or at the same rate. its willfulness. and the adequacy of other remedies. If the contract is made after the lawyer has finished providing services. that payment is to be credited against whatever fee the lawyer is entitled to collect. Acquire a lien as provided by §43 to secure the lawyer’s fee or expenses. absent a contrary statute or court order. including a contract modifying an existing contract. the basis or rate of the fee. make an agreement giving the lawyer literary or media rights to a portrayal or account based in substantial part on information relating to the representation. the client may avoid it if the client was not informed of facts needed to evaluate the 67 .com §36 FORBIDDEN CLIENT-LAWYER FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS (1) A lawyer may not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation that the lawyer is conducting for a client. except that the lawyer may: a. except that the lawyer may make or guarantee a loan covering court costs and expenses of litigation. Considerations relevant to the question of forfeiture include the gravity and timing of the violation. (3) Unless a contract construed in the circumstances indicates otherwise: a. §18 CLIENT-LAWYER CONTRACTS (1) A contract between a lawyer and client concerning the client-lawyer relationship. (2) The validity and construction of a contract between a client and a lawyer concerning the lawyer’s fees are governed by §18. Contract with the client for a contingent fee in a civil case except when prohibited as stated in §35 (2) A lawyer may not make or guarantee a loan to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation that the lawyer is conducting for the client. §38 CLIENT-LAWYER FEE CONTRACTS (1) Before or within a reasonable time after beginning to represent a client in a matter. in writing when applicable rules so provide. and b. its effect on the value of the lawyer’s work for the client.

the discharge or withdrawal is not attributable to misconduct of the lawyer b. §43 LAWYER LIENS (1) Except as provided in Subsection (2) or by statute or rule. the lawyer has performed several services. a client owes a lawyer who has performed legal services for the client the fair value of the lawyer’s services. or harass the client.com appropriateness of the lawyer’s compensation or other benefits conferred on the lawyer by the contract (2) A tribunal should construe a contract between client and lawyer as a reasonable person in the circumstances of the client would have construed it. including a suit by the lawyer to recover an unpaid fee. use confidential information when not permitted under §65.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. and the extent and value of the lawyer’s services. allowing contractual compensation would not burden the client’s choice of counsel or the client’s ability to replace counsel §41 FEE COLLECTION METHODS In seeking compensation claimed from a client or former client. the making of any disclosures to the client required to render a contract enforceable. when relevant. except that (2) the tribunal may allow such a lawyer to recover the ratable proportion of the compensation provided by such a contract if: a. an arbitration to which both parties consent unless applicable law renders the lawyer’s consent unnecessary. §39 A LAWYER’S FEE IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONTRACT If a client and lawyer have not made a valid contract providing for another measure of compensation. or in the court’s discretion a proceeding ancillary to a pending suit in which the lawyer performed the services in question. A lawyer may decline to deliver to a client or a former client an original or copy of any document prepared by the lawyer or at the lawyer’s expense if the client or former client has not paid all fees and disbursements 68 . and c. §40 FEES ON TERMINATION If a client-lawyer relationship ends before the lawyer has completed the services due for a matter and the lawyer’s fee has not been forfeited under §37: (1) a lawyer who has been discharged or withdraws may recover the lesser of the fair value of the lawyer’s services as determined under §39 and the ratable proportion of the compensation provided by any otherwise enforceable contract between lawyer and client for the services performed. §42 REMEDIES AND THE BURDEN OF PERSUASION (1) A fee dispute between a lawyer and a client may be adjudicated in any appropriate proceeding. of the existence and terms of any fee contract. a suit for a refund by a client. a lawyer may not employ collection methods forbidden by law. (2) In any such proceeding the lawyer has the burden of persuading the trier of fact. a lawyer does not acquire a lien entitling the lawyer to retain the client’s property in the lawyer’s possession in order to secure payment of the lawyer’s fees and disbursements.

The lawyer may not unreasonably impede the speedy and inexpensive resolution of any dispute concerning those fees and disbursements or the lien. and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly 2) the likelihood.000 for a DUI 69 . he didn’t pad the bill. The lawyer may contract in writing with the client for a lien on the proceeds of the representation to secure payment for the lawyer’s services and disbursements in that matter b. (4) With respect to property neither in the lawyer’s possession nor recovered by the client through the lawyer’s efforts. (2) Unless otherwise provided by statute or rule.50. that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer 3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services 4) the amount involved and results obtained 5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances 6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client 7) the experience. and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing services 8) whether the fee is fixed contingent cannot charge to learn how to do something new on the case (ex: civil litigator. (3) A tribunal where an action is pending may in its discretion adjudicate any fee or other dispute concerning a lien asserted by a lawyer on property of a party to the action. release all or part of the property to the client or lawyer. the lawyer may obtain a security interest on property of a client only as provided by other law and consistent with §18 and 126. Substantive Economics Regulation – fees must be reasonable. and grant such other relief as justice may require. The lien applies only to the amount of fees and disbursements claimed reasonably and in good faith for the lawyer’s services performed in the representation and d. client and lawyer may agree that the lawyer shall have a security interest in property of the client recovered for the client through the lawyer’s efforts. but outside of the reasonable range of what lawyers that do this work charge Lawyers get fees only one way – they confer benefits on clients. as follows: a.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. if apparent to the client. you must be able to demonstrate the benefit the client received for the money. If you want to say “I took title to the money”. provide for custody of the property.000 to try first offense DUI since had never done one of those cases before) no question he did all the work. reputation. Acquisition of such a security interest is a business or financial transaction with a client within the meaning of 126.com due for the lawyer’s work in preparing the document and nondelivery would not unreasonably harm the client or former client. there is no such thing as money without benefit It says that you have to recite in writing the reasons why mere availability without obligation to do work is a benefit to the client b/c that is what you’re proposing In the Matter of Laurence Fordham . must not charge unreasonable fee or charge unreasonable expenses 8 factors on page 2 1) the time and labor required. The lien becomes binding on a third party when the party has notice of the lien c. the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved. charged the client $50.

if the lawyer. with reasonable experience. mediation. even if you don’t hurt anyone MR 5.3 70 . or other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in this or another jurisdiction. or (4) are not within paragraphs (c)(2) or (c)(3) and arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer’s practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be authorized (3) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration. become matters of routine Warhaftig Rule: You can’t pull funds out of that client’s retainer early before you earn the fees. may provide legal services in this jurisdiction that: (1) are provided to the lawyer’s employer or its organizational affiliates and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission. What can’t be substituted by computers and outsourcing? Trial advocacy. (b) A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction shall not (1) except as authorized by these Rules or other law. (d) A lawyer admitted in another US jurisdiction. That’s unauthorized practice of law.com Rule: Client should not be expected to pay for education of lawyer when he spends excessive amounts of time on tasks which.6 MR 8.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. establish an office or other systematic or continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law. RELATIONS WITH OTHER LAWYERS Hierarchy in rules exist: MR 3. or (2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction (c) A lawyer admitted in another US jurisdiction. or a person the lawyer is assisting.3 MR 1. and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction. MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW (a) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction. or (2) are services that the lawyer is authorized by federal or other law to provide in this jurisdiction Computer programs that do taxes and wills and other various legal things for one flat rate to buy the program Is computer software like that practicing law? Yes. or assist another in doing so. and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction who actively participates in the matter (1) are undertaken in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in this jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter (2) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction. Do more than spit out rules. if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer’s practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission.5 UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW.

deceit or misrepresentation (d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law. or (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law. trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.6 or information gained by a lawyer or judge while participating in an approved lawyers assistance program. shall inform the appropriate professional authority (b) a lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1. Conway.4 MISCONDUCT It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. fraud.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. DeGraff. disclosure to the tribunal. trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty. Foy.3 CANDOR TOWARD TRIBUNAL (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer (2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel. knowingly assist or induce another to do so. If a lawyer. discipline may be appropriate even if no dishonest motive for misconduct exists and client approval of attorney’s failure to report does not immunize lawyer from disciplinary action. 71 . the lawyer’s client. that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.com MR 8. Claims Between Attorneys Alice Whalen v. Holt-Harris & Mealy Rule: Lawyer who hires second lawyer has duty to supervise the second lawyer’s actions. or (3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter. or do so through the acts of another (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty. or a witness called by the lawyer. In re James H.3 REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT (a) a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty. Himmel Rule: Lawyer must report other lawyer’s violation of MR. MR 8. including. has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity. ETHICS IN ADVOCACY MR 3. the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures. if necessary. Bright line rule.

lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures. MR 3. destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. (c) Knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal. Suspension appropriate when lawyer knows that false statements submitted to court or material information is being properly withheld and takes no remedial action. People v.6. (c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding. whether or not the facts are adverse. is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures.4 FAIRNESS TO OPPOSING PARTY AND COUNSEL A lawyer shall not: (a) unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter. and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1. Holding: Respondent had duty to court to disclose that his client was impersonating SJ in criminal proceedings. Attorney should use narrative approach to deal with these 2 conflicting rights.6 (d) In an ex parte proceeding. William Casey Rule: Lawyer must disclose to court if client is making false representation. disclosure to the tribunal. Disciplinary Risks Warrick: Rule: If lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity. Johnson Rule: D has a constitutional right to be heard. (3) A lawyer may refuse to offer testimony or other evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes to be false. or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law. a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision. continue to the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1. the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures and may disclose confidential client information when necessary to take such a measure. including. even if the lawyer does not know it to be false. counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely.com (b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act (b) falsify evidence. Holding: Narrative approach represent best accommodation of competing interest Candor Towards Trubunal People of CO v. §120 FALSE TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE (1) A lawyer may not: (a) knowingly counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely or otherwise offer false evidence (b) knowingly make a false statement of fact to the tribunal (c) offer testimony or other evidence as to an issue of fact known by the lawyer to be false (2) if a lawyer has offered testimony or other evidence as to a material issue of fact and comes to know of its falsity. except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists 72 . lawyer has duty not to introduce perjured testimony. if necessary.

Holding: Observation by defense counsel of investigator that is the product of privileged communication. If defense counsel leaves the evidence where he discovers it. may not be admitted unless the defense by altering or removing physical evidence has precluded the prosecution from making that same observation. Conduct of defense precluded prosecution from ascertaining crucial fact of location of wallet. and. allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence. v. the defense investigator removed the wallet and thereby frustrated any possibility that police might later discover it in trash can. it must move for a protective order. Here. make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party (e) In trial.8 SPECIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF A PROSECUTOR The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause (b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to. must answer all interrogatories and all requests for production. his observations derived from privileged communications are protected. the statutory privilege does not bar revelation of the original location or condition of evidence in question. and the procedure for obtaining. the credibility of a witness. Rule: Discovery rules to not allow party to produce only what it agreed to produce or was ordered to produce.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. If a party does not want to respond. Dobson & Welch Rule: Mutual enmity does not excuse break down of decorum in any phase of litigation Holding: Sanctions for all lawyers involved – censured and admonished. or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause. such as the right to a preliminary hearing (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense. Holding: Lawyer sanctioned for failure to produce document MR 3. in connection with sentencing. unless a specific and clear objection is made.com (d) In pretrial procedure. Discovery Evidence Redwood v. Fisons Corp. Further violations will result in sterner sanctions Washington State Physicians Ins. All relevant documents must be produced – party does not have option of determining what it wants to produce or answer. and (2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the person’s interests will not be adversely affected by refraining from giving such information Handling Evidence People v. or (f) Request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant information to another party unless: (1) the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client. counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel (c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights. disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged 73 . Michael Meredith Rule: Whenever defense counsel removes or alters evidence. assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness. the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of an accused.

law enforcement personnel. refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care or prevent investigators. the lawyer must notify prosecuting authorities of the lawyer’s possession of the evidence or turn the evidence over to them. §119 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A CLIENT CRIME With respect to physical evidence of a client crime.6 or this Rule.com mitigating information known to the prosecutor. except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal (e) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes: (1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege (2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution. employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3. and (3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information (f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor’s action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose.Downloaded From OutlineDepot. a lawyer: (1) may. but (2) following possession under Subsection (1). 74 . when reasonably necessary for purposes of the representation. take possession of the evidence and retain it for the time reasonably necessary to examine it and subject it to tests that do not alter or destroy material characteristics of the evidence.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->