Studies in

Education Policy
March 2010

Report Card on Ontario’s
Elementary Schools
2010
by Peter Cowley, Stephen Easton, and Michael Thomas

MARCH 2010

Report Card on Ontario’s
Elementary Schools 2010
By Peter Cowley, Stephen Easton, and Michael Thomas

Contents
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................3
Key academic indicators of school performance .........................................................................................5
Other indicators of school performance .....................................................................................................8
Notes....................................................................................................................................................10
Detailed school reports...........................................................................................................................11
Ranking the schools .............................................................................................................................208
Appendix 1: Calculating the Overall rating out of 10 ...........................................................................232
About the authors ..............................................................................................................................234
Acknowledgments................................................................................................................................236

2

each of which reports results for an aspect of school performance that may be improved. This finding confirms the results of research carried out in other countries. it will come as no great surprise to experienced parents and educators that 3 .2 Parents who already have a child enrolled at the school provide another point of view. Of course. it alerts parents to those nearby schools that appear to have more effective academic programs. This inevitable attention provides an incentive for all those connected with a school to focus on student results. as do those whose performance is deteriorating. By doing so. Report Card) collects a variety of relevant. one must believe that improvement is achievable. and local school boards may also provide useful information. However.3 Indeed. a sound academic program should be complemented by effective programs in areas of school activity not measured by the Report Card. Nevertheless. This Report Card. like other report cards from the Fraser Institute. easily accessible public document so that anyone can analyze and compare the performance of individual schools. parents will be better prepared to ask relevant questions when they visit schools under consideration and speak with the staff. the Report Card assists parents when they choose a school for their children and encourages and assists all those seeking to improve their schools. Schools that perform well or show consistent improvement are applauded. picture of each school that is not easily available elsewhere. even when we take into account factors such as the students’ family background—which some believe dictate the degree of academic success that students can enjoy in school—some schools do better than others. It demonstrates clearly that. Naturally. the Report Card provides a detailed Some schools do better than others To improve a school. and this can provide motivation. objective indicators of school performance into one. provides evidence about what can be accomplished. Web sites maintained by Ontario’s Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO). Because it makes comparisons easy. The Report Card helps parents choose Where parents can choose among several schools for their children. It includes a variety of indicators. the Report Card offers more than just incentive. the Report Card provides a valuable tool for making a decision. School administrators who are dedicated to their students’ academic success accept the Report Card as another source of opportunities for improvement.1 the provincial ministry of education.Introduction The Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 (hereafter. Parents can also determine whether schools of interest are improving over time. the choice of a school should not be made solely on the basis of a single source of information. By first studying the Report Card. Poorly performing schools generate concern. The Report Card facilitates school improvement The act of publicly rating and ranking schools attracts attention.

By studying the techniques used in schools where students are successful. By comparing a school’s results with those of neighbouring schools or schools having similar school and student characteristics.4 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 the data consistently suggest that what goes on in the schools makes a difference to academic results and that some schools make a greater difference than others. and criticisms. we can see if the school is improving. The indicator reflects the size of the contribution the school has made to the success of its students. and rankings. Please contact Michael Thomas at 416. we can identify more successful schools and learn from them. .363. You can contribute to the development of the Report Card The Report Card program benefits from the input of interested parties. Reference to overall provincial results places an individual school’s level of achievement in a broader context. We welcome your suggestions. Comparisons are at the heart of the improvement process By comparing a school’s latest results with those of earlier years. There is great benefit in identifying schools that are particularly effective. What’s new in this Edition? New indicator of value added by the school An addition has been made to the socio-economic indicator. Its “Leading Edge” program4 helps educators connect with others who have expertise in particular areas of instruction and school administration. Comparisons are at the heart of improvement: making comparisons among schools is made simpler and more meaningful by the Report Card’s indicators. less effective schools may find ways to improve. The indicator now reports the difference between each school’s actual Overall rating for the year and the overall rating predicted based on the average income of the school’s parents. ratings. comments. This advantage is not lost on the United Kingdom’s Department of Education and Skills. ESL and Special needs added to student characteristics indicators The detailed tables now include an indicator of the percentage of each school’s students who are enrolled in ESL and the percentage of students with special needs.6575.

(7) the difference between male and female students in their average levels of achievement on the EQAO assessment in grade-6 reading. Level 1 was given a value of 1 for purposes of determining the average. writing. (6) average level of achievement on the grade6 EQAO assessment in mathematics. The EQAO converts the raw score on each test into a level of achievement from 1 to 4. all of which are derived from province-wide tests of reading. a value of 4. writ- (3) average level of achievement on the grade3 EQAO assessment in mathematics. (4) average level of achievement on the grade6 EQAO assessment in reading. Level 2. 5 . (5) average level of achievement on the grade6 EQAO assessment in writing.Key academic indicators of school performance We have selected this set of indicators because they provide systematic insight into a school’s performance. Level 3 is considered the provincial standard and Level 4 represents achievement well above the expected level. and Level 4. These indicators—in the tables. and mathematics skills that are administered by the province’s Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO). a value of 2. Fundamental to the mission of elementary schools is teaching students sound basic skills in reading.5 Indicators of effective teaching (1) average level of achievement on the grade3 EQAO assessment in reading. In order to calculate the average level achieved by the students at a school on any given test. Grade 3 avg. we can assess not only each school’s performance in a year but also its improvement or deterioration over time. and mathematics at the grade-3 and grade-6 levels. The foundation of the Report Card is an overall rating of each school’s academic performance. a value of 3. a numerical value was given to each level of achievement. A value of 0 was given in those cases where a student completed the test but did not demonstrate sufficient understanding to be assigned achievement Level 1. We base our Overall rating out of 10 on the school’s performance on nine indicators. Thus. Average levels of achievement on EQAO’s assessments (2) average level of achievement on the grade3 EQAO assessment in writing. Because they are based on annually generated data. Achievement at Level 3 or 4 suggests that students are well prepared for work at the next grade. level—show the average level of proficiency achieved by the school’s students on the uniform EQAO assessments in reading. Achievement at Levels 1 and 2 suggest that the student has not yet met the provincial standard. Level 3. (8) the difference between male and female students in their average levels of achievement on the EQAO assessment in grade-6 mathematics. (9) the percentage of EQAO assessments that did not meet the provincial standard. writing. level and Grade 6 avg.

Finally. and class participation to rate a student. The Report Cards provide evidence that successful teachers overcome such impediments. some personal and family characteristics. The overall rating of school performance answers the question. Just as teachers combine test scores. It seems reasonable. How well do the teachers take student differences into account? The Gender gap indicators The Gender gap indicators—in the tables Gender gap (level)—use the grade-6 results of the EQAO’s assessments to determine how successful the school has been in narrowing the achievement gap between male and female students in reading and mathematics. The tests upon which the Report Card is based assess students on these dimensions. it is almost always the case that any school does better on some indicators than on others. at the minimum. by the total number of such tests written by the students at the school. left unmitigated. So. this score was converted into an overall rating out of 10. “In general. There are. compared to other schools in the report card?” To derive this rating.6 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 ing. Such differences in outcomes cannot be wholly explained by the individual and family characteristics of the school’s students. can have a deleterious effect on a student’s academic development. however. therefore. motivation. Since reading. just as a teacher must make a decision about a student’s overall performance. Percentage of EQAO tests below standard In general. the results for each of the nine indicators. The more successful sex is reported along with the difference in the detailed tables. Undoubtedly. Standardized values can readily be combined and compared.6 These While each of the indicators is important. for each subject area. how is the school doing academically compared to other schools in the Report Card? The Overall rating out of 10 For each school. indicators are determined. and work habits will inevitably have some impact upon the final results. how is the school doing academically. we are able to gauge the extent to which schools provide effective teaching to all of their students. homework. It is from this Overall rating out of 10 that . Basic literacy and numeracy are essential building blocks for life-long learning. were first standardized. It was derived by dividing the total number of all the above tests that provided enough information to enable the calculation of a score but that did not meet the provincial standard. students should. we have combined all the indicators to produce an overall rating. we need an overall indicator of school performance— in the tables Overall rating out of 10. Standardization is a statistical procedure whereby sets of raw data with different characteristics are converted into sets of values sharing certain statistical properties. this indicator—in the tables Tests below standard (%)—provides the rate of failure on the EQAO’s tests. Schools have the responsibility of ensuring that their students are adequately prepared to do so. for each school year. and mathematics. writing. and mathematics are critical to students’ further intellectual and personal development. The standardized data were then weighted and combined to produce an overall standardized score. By comparing the results of male and female students in two subject areas— reading and mathematics—in which one group or the other may have enjoyed a historical advantage. demonstrate that they meet the accepted standard of performance for their grade in these subject areas. Differences among students in abilities. by calculating the absolute value of the difference between male and female students in their average level of achievement. to include the average test marks in these three critical subject areas as indicators of effective teaching. recognizable differences from school to school within a district in the average results on the EQAO’s tests. There is also variation within schools in the results obtained in different subject areas and at different grades.

Note that the Overall rating out of 10. 7 Further. no values for the Gender gap indicators can be provided. on the report card’s indicators. (See Appendix 1 for an explanation of the calculation of the Overall rating out of 10. it is very likely that it can still improve. but at a rate lower than the average. in order for a school to show improvement in its Overall rating out of 10. Thus. For schools where there were fewer than 15 test results for boys or for girls. In these cases the Overall rating out of 10 is derived using the remaining indicators.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy the school’s provincial rank is determined. However. An overall rating of zero means that on average. it measures each school’s performance compared to all the other schools in the province. That is. no school in the province performed more poorly. even though a school receives an overall rating of 10. If it improves. it does not mean that the lowest performing school has accomplished nothing for its students. it must improve faster than the average. is a relative rating. based as it is on standardized scores.) . because it is a relative measure. it will show a decline in its rating.

and backgrounds of their students. The socioeconomic indicator was derived as fol- The Trend indicator Is the school improving academically? The Report Card provides five years of data for most schools. They also provide a more accurate reflection of the level of achievement at the school. it identifies schools where students with a relatively positive home situation appear not to be reaching their presumed potential. add more information on the school’s effectiveness. of its students write the tests. To calculate the trends. or almost all. we developed the Trend indicator. The socioeconomic indicator When they design their lesson plans and deliver the curriculum. To detect trends in the performance indicators. for each of the six test sittings. this historical record provides evidence of change (or lack thereof) over time. educators can overcome disadvantages that their students may have. This result was then divided by the total number of tests that could have been completed if all students had fully participated in all of the tests that were administered at the school. Because calculation of trends is uncertain when only a small number of data points is available. that is. the standardized scores rather than raw data are used. Similarly. For this indicator. The socioeconomic indicator enables us to identify schools that are successful despite adverse conditions faced by their students at home. Standardizing makes historical data more comparable and the trend measurement more reliable. By doing so. while they are not used to derive the Overall rating out of 10. The principal of a school at which a relatively large percentage of students did not complete the tests should be able to provide good reasons for the students’ failure to do so and a well-developed plan to increase participation in future test sittings. The Tests not written indicator Schools that administer the EQAO’s assessments are expected to ensure that all their students write the tests. interests. The indicator of tests not written—in the tables Tests not written (%)—was determined by first summing. it did not happen just by chance. Unlike a snapshot of one year’s results. nine times out of 10. Higher participation rates provide the benefit of objective assessment of learning to more students and parents. we have defined the term “statistically significant” to mean that. The six sums were then totaled. A reader can have more confidence that the test results are a true reflection of the school’s average achievement level if all. the total number of students for whom no test data was submitted or who were exempt from testing. educators can and should take into account the abilities. 8 .Other indicators of school performance The Report Card includes other indicators that. the trend that is noted is real. a trend is indicated only in those circumstances where five years of data are available and where the trend is statistically significant. This indicator uses statistical analysis to identify those dimensions of school performance in which there has likely been real change rather than a fluctuation in results caused by random occurrences.

The more effectively the school enables all of its students to succeed. we used the formula derived from the regression analysis to predict the Overall rating for each school. inc. many other factors—including good teaching. during the 2008/2009 school year. when a school had more parents with higher incomes.2 and yet. As was noted in the Introduction. Thus.5 is reported in the tables.3. although its predicted rating was 6. when the parental income of the student body was taken into account. the school was expected to achieve a rating of only about 5. less than 25% of the variation among Ontario elementary schools in the overall rating is associated with the level of parental employment income. regardless of the family background of its students. The effective school will produce good results. this socioeconomic indicator should not be used as an excuse or rationale for poor school performance. the statistical measures used describe past relationships between a socioeconomic characteristic and a measure of school effectiveness. can be used to identify schools with similar student body characteristics. along with the average parental employment income. Second.) between the actual Overall rating and this predicted value in each school’s results table. using enrolment data from the Ministry of Education sorted by postal code and 2006 census data provided by Statistics Canada. On the other hand. Roberta Bondar Public School. As a measure of the success with which each school took into account the socioeconomic characteristics of the student body. For example. a public elementary school in Brampton.2. the weaker will be the relationship between the home characteristics of its students and their academic success. First. We then reported the difference (in the tables Actual rating vs predicted rating based on parents’ avg. counselling. . First.1. it is sometimes useful to compare a school’s results to those of similar schools. achieved an Overall rating of 7. 9 This measure of the effect of the socioeconomic background of a school’s student body is presented with two important notes of caution. The analysis determined that.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy lows. Clearly. These two indicators.7. another Brampton public school. The reported difference for Somerset Drive PS is -1. was 5. These relationships may not remain static. We then used regression analysis to determine the relationship between parental income and variations in school performance as measured by the Overall rating out of 10. and school administration—contribute to the effectiveness of schools. The Student characteristics indicator For each public school. the Overall rating at the school was likely to be higher. on average. This measurement suggests that Roberta Bondar PS is more successful than Somerset Drive PS in enabling all of its students to reach their potential. the actual Overall rating of Somerset Drive Public School. The difference of 1. we determined the average level of parental income from wages and salaries and from self-employment. the Report Card notes the percentage of its students who are enrolled in ESL programs or who have certain identified special needs.

com/>. 2 See.gov. Girls. 5 The EQAO’s test results. teachers. for instance. The DA is the smallest standard geographical area for which all census data are disseminated.gov. see the EQAO’s web site at <http://www. data.Notes 1 The Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) is an arm’s-length agency of the provincial government. The results or views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not those of the Ontario Ministry of Education. It provides parents. and the general public with information about student achievement. BC: The Fraser Institute. 1988). MA: Harvard University Press.. 4 See the website of Leading Edge at <http://www. eqao.com/>. 2001): page 14.eqao. the Ministry of Education’s web site at <http://www. or the web site of the Toronto Catholic District School Board at <http://www.uk/leadingedge/> (as of May 24. 3 See. School Matters: The Junior Years (Wells. For more information. 8 Peter Cowley with Shahrokh Shahabi-Azad.dfes. the EQAO’s web site at <http:// www. standards.ca>. All of Canada is divided into dissemination areas. for instance. Studies in Education Policy (Vancouver.org/>. Report Card on Alberta’s High Schools: 2001 Edition.edu. Public Policy Sources 22 (Vancouver. and Grades: Academic Gender Balance in British Columbia’s Secondary Schools. 7 A Dissemination Area (DA) is a small geographical area comprising one or more neighbouring blocks. BC: The Fraser Institute. Somerset: Open Books. 1979) and Peter Mortimore et al. Boys. 6 For a discussion of gender-based differentials in academic achievement. and school information used or reported in this publication were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Education. 2006).on. Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children (Cambridge.. Michael Rutter et al. with a population of 400 to 700 persons. 1999). student enrollment 10 .tcdsb. see Peter Cowley and Stephen Easton.

4 — F 0. Find the geographical area in the “Index of geographical areas” and note the page on which its results begin. Of course.7 2.4 F– Writing 2.4 2.9 p 2.1 37. a sound academic program should be complemented by effective proA – GEOGRAPHICAL AREA B – School name [Affiliation] City C – ESL (%): 0. Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 13.eqao. IMPORTANT: In order to get the most from the Report Card.0 N – Tests not written (%) 11.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend – 2.7 2.2 — 6 4. The complete Report Card can be downloaded free of charge from the Fraser Institute’s web site at <http://www.7 2. Use the sample table and the explanation of each line below to help you interpret the detailed results for individual schools.4 1.5 2.8 — 2. To find a school’s results.0 D – Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a F 0.4 4.7 n/a M 0.8 I– Writing 2.4 G– Math 2.1 O – Overall rating out of 10 6.2 2. and other parents.4 Note Private schools are not required to administer the EQAO tests.7 32.7 q –P 2.8 2. Families choosing a school for their children should seek to confirm the Report Card ’s findings by visiting the school and interviewing teachers. 11 .1 — 13.0 1.7 — 2.7 2.7 n/a F 0.7 q 2.6 2. the schools are listed in alphabetical order. Since the Report Card is based on results achieved on these tests. level: Reading 2.8 2.com> and on the web sites of local school districts and schools.4 H – Gr 6 avg.5 2. inc. More information regarding test results at individual schools can be found on the Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) web site at <http:// www.5 2. school administrators.7 2.2 0.2 F 0.100: -0.Detailed school reports How to read these tables grams in areas of school activity not measured by the Report Card. of $78.8 5. By considering several years of results— rather than just a school’s rank in the most recent year—readers can get a better idea of how the school is likely to perform in the future.1 K – Gender gap (level): Reading E L– Math n/a M – Tests below standard (%) 30. Within each geographical area.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 E – Gr 3 avg. only a few private schools that chose to administer the EQAO tests could be included.7 — – A — Geographical area The schools are grouped into geographical areas. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 40.9 J– Math 3.4 n/a 34.fraserinstitute. find its location in the “List of cities and geographical areas” and note its geographical area.org>. readers should consult the complete table of results for each school of interest.1 F 0.

Important note Schools that administer these tests are expected to ensure that all their students participate. E to J — Gr 3 avg score and Gr 6 avg score The average level achieved by the students on the grade-3 and grade-6 EQAO tests. D (left) — Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ average employment income This statistic compares the school’s actual Overall rating out of 10 with the rating that is predicted by the average parental employment income in each student’s family. these statistics can be used to find other schools were the student body has similar characteristics. Level 3 is considered the provincial standard and Level 4 represents achievement well above the expected level. the value is preceded by an F. The principal of a school with . affiliation. In order to calculate the average level. Level 3. you should take note of the Tests not written percentage when you consider each school’s results in the Report Card. The percentage. the test was given a value of 0. Level 1 was given a value of 1 for purposes of determining the average. K & L — Gr 7 gender gap The difference (in average level of achievement) between girls and boys in the grade-6 reading and mathematics tests. A high ranking over five years indicates consistently strong results at the school. C — ESL (%). D (right) — Rank The school’s overall academic rank in the province for 2008/2009 and for the most recent five years. Level 2. the value is preceded by an M.12 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 B (left) — School name. The EQAO assigns a level of achievement to each completed test. Achievement at Levels 1 and 2 suggest that the student has not yet met the provincial standard. Smaller differences indicate that the school is doing a good job for all its students. Where the difference favours the girls. The rankings show how the school has done academically compared to the other schools in the Report Card. A positive difference suggests that the school is effective in enabling its students to succeed regardless of their family’s characteristics. For this reason it is particularly important to consider previous results as well as those for the most recent year. Thus. Thus. For this reason. Tests not written. its affiliation—public. N — Tests not written (%) The percentage of the tests that could have been completed by the school’s students but which were not assigned an overall score. In those cases where a student completed the test but did not demonstrate sufficient understanding to be assigned achievement Level 1. Where boys are favoured. Special needs (%) These statistics report the percentage of the students for whom English is a second-language and the percentage of students with special needs. When you want to compare academic results. achievement at Level 3 or 4 suggests that students are well prepared for work at the next grade. or private—and the city in which the school is located. M — Tests below standard The percentage of all the completed tests written by students at the school that were judged to be below Level 3. a value of 2. An E means that there is no difference between the girls and the boys on this measure. and city The school name. B (right) — Grade-6 enrollment The number of students eligible to participate in the grade-6 tests. takes into account tests not written by students for whom no results were received by the EQAO or who were exempt from writing the tests. a value of 3. a numerical value was given to each level of achievement. a value of 4. Catholic. and Level 4. A low percentage of Tests below standard (%) indicates that the school is successful in ensuring that most of its students are meeting or exceeding the provincial standard of performance for the grade. Indicator results for schools with small enrollments tend to be more variable than do those for larger schools.

schools at which fewer than 15 students were enrolled in each of these grades are excluded.6575. only those schools that administer the EQAO tests could be included. Note 5 Note 1 Not all the province’s elementary schools are included in the tables or the ranking. A downward-pointing arrow means that the school is probably getting worse. . Report Cards Program. the EQAO provided no data. contact Michael Thomas. O — Overall rating out of 10 The Overall rating out of 10 takes into account the nine indicators described in E through M above to answer the question. Note 3 Due to continuing improvements in methodology. Note that for the two Gender gap indicators. at the Fraser Institute at 416. and Tests below standard a downward trend in the data will lead to an upward-pointing arrow in the trend column. Private schools and federally funded schools operated by First Nations are not required to administer the EQAO tests.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy a high Tests not written percentage should be able to provide good reasons for the students’ failure to complete the tests. also excluded are schools that did not generate a sufficiently large set of student data to enable the calculation of an Overall rating out of 10. “In general. Note 6 You can compare a school’s results with these allschools average results in the table below. a decreasing Tests below standard (%) indicates improvement and so an upward-pointing arrow is displayed. the elementary schools may not enroll students in grade 6. some historical values for indicators and overall ratings may differ from those previously reported. “n/a” appears in the column. Note 2 The EQAO’s test results. The researchers had to be at least 90% sure that the changes were not just random before indicating a trend. Note 4 In accordance with its regulations regarding the privacy of personal information. Associate Director. The exclusion of a school from the Report Card should not be considered a judgement of the school’s effectiveness. In some school districts that operate middle schools or junior high schools. Finally. In addition. “n/a” appears in the tables. student enrollment data. Tests not written. Since Where there were insufficient data available with which to calculate an indicator or where a school was not in operation during a specific year. Note 7 If you have questions about the Report Card. Where insufficient data were available. A dash indicates that there is no significant change. where the results in a test involved fewer than 15 students.363. how is the school doing academically compared to other schools in the Report Card?” P — Trends An upward-pointing arrow at the end of an indicator row means that the school is probably improving on that indicator. The results or views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not those of the Ontario Ministry of Education. these elementary schools cannot be included. For example. and school information used or reported in this publication were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Education. Other notes 13 the results of these tests form the basis for this Report Card. Since the Report Card is based on the results of tests given in grades 3 and 6.

and was even at 14.7 2. females at 44.7 2.6 4.3 0. males at 11.2% of schools.7% of schools.0 6.7 2.6 2.600 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2. The Math gender gap favoured males at 38.8 2.8 p Math 2.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading* 0.8 p Math 2.6 Writing 2.8 p Writing 2.4% schools.2 q Exams below standard (%) 35.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9% of schools.8 p Gr 6 avg.0 n/a * These results reflect the average size of the grade 6 gender gaps in 2008/2009.2 0. and was even at 16.9 p Tests not written (%) 5.8 2.2 30.8 2.1 3.0 6. The Reading gender gap favoured females at 74. .7 2.2 Math* 0.7 2.6% of schools.7 2.7 2.2 0.0 6.1 5.7 2.7 2.2 0.0 6.6 2.0 34.8 2.2 0.8 33.2 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 0.6 p Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Parents’ avg income: $ 73.0 32.7 2.14 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Average values for all schools 2008/2009 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Average ESL (%): 4.2 0.6 4.2% of schools.9 Average Special Needs (%): 19.7 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 15 List of cities and geographical areas City Geographical area City Geographical area Acton Addison Ailsa Craig Ajax Alexandria Alfred Alliston Alma Almonte Alvinston Ameliasburgh Amherstburg Amherstview Ancaster Angus Arnprior Arthur Athens Atikokan Atwood Aurora Aylmer Ayr Ayton Azilda Baden Balmertown Baltimore Bancroft Bangalore Barrie Barry’s Bay Batawa Bath Battersea Beamsville Beaverton Beeton Belfountain Belle River Belle Rivière Belleville Belmont Berwick Binbrook Blackstock Blenheim Blind River Bloomfield Blyth Bobcaygeon Bolton Bothwell Bourget Bowmanville Bracebridge Bradford Brampton Brantford Brechin Breslau Bridgenorth Brigden Brighton Bright’s Grove Brockville Brooklin Brucefield Brussels Burford Burgessville Burk’s Falls Burlington Buttonville Caistor Centre Caledon Caledon East Caledon Village Caledonia Callander Cambridge Campbellcroft Campbellford Campbellville Cannington Capreol Carleton Place Carlisle Carp Carpion Casselman Cavan Cayuga Chapleau Chatham Chatsworth Chelmsford Chesley Chesterville Claremont Clarence Creek Clinton Cloyne Cobalt Cobden Coboconk Upper Canada Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Trillium Lakelands Area Simcoe County Area Peel Area Brantford Simcoe County Area Waterloo Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Lambton Kent Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Lambton Kent Area Upper Canada Area Durham Area Avon Maitland Area Avon Maitland Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Near North Area Halton Area York Area Niagara Area Peel Area Peel Area Peel Area Grand Erie Area Near North Area Waterloo Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Halton Area Durham Area Rainbow Area Upper Canada Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Ottawa Ottawa Upper Canada Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Grand Erie Area Algoma Area Lambton Kent Area Bluewater Area Rainbow Area Bluewater Area Upper Canada Area Durham Area Upper Canada Area Avon Maitland Area Hastings-Limestone Area Ontario North East Area Renfrew County Area Trillium Lakelands Area Halton Area Upper Canada Area Thames Valley Area Durham Area Upper Canada Area Upper Canada Area Simcoe County Area Upper Grand Area Upper Canada Area Lambton Kent Area Hastings-Limestone Area Greater Essex Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Simcoe County Area Renfrew County Area Upper Grand Area Upper Canada Area Kenora Area Avon Maitland Area York Area Thames Valley Area Waterloo Area Bluewater Area Rainbow Area Waterloo Area Kenora Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Hastings-Limestone Area Overseas Barrie Renfrew County Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area Niagara Area Durham Area Simcoe County Area Peel Area Greater Essex Area Greater Essex Area Hastings-Limestone Area Thames Valley Area Upper Canada Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Durham Area Lambton Kent Area Algoma Area Hastings-Limestone Area Avon Maitland Area Trillium Lakelands Area Peel Area Lambton Kent Area .

16 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 List of cities and geographical areas City Geographical area City Geographical area Cobourg Cochrane Colborne Coldwater Collingwood Comber Concord Conestogo Coniston Cookstown Copetown Copper Cliff Corbeil Corbyville Cornwall Corunna Cottam Courtice Courtland Creemore Crystal Beach Cumberland Cumberland Beach Dalkeith Deep River Delaware Delhi Dorchester Drayton Dresden Drumbo Dryden Dublin Dundas Dunnville Dunsford Durham Dutton Eganville Egbert Elgin Elginburg Elliot Lake Elmira Elmvale Elora Embro Embrun Emeryville Emo Emsdale Englehart Ennismore Erin Espanola Essex Ethel Everett Exeter Fenelon Falls Fergus Fisherville Fitzroy Harbour Flesherton Fonthill Forest Formosa Fort Erie Fort Frances Foxboro Frankford Gananoque Garson Georgetown Glen Morris Glencoe Gloucester Goderich Goodwood Gore Bay Gores Landing Gorrie Goulais River Gowanstown Grafton Grand Valley Gravenhurst Greely Greenbank Greenwood Grimsby Guelph Hagersville Haileybury Halton Hills Hamilton Hammond Hanmer Hanover Harrow Harrowsmith Havelock Hawkesbury Hawkestone Hepworth Hickson Upper Grand Area Rainbow Area Greater Essex Area Avon Maitland Area Simcoe County Area Avon Maitland Area Trillium Lakelands Area Upper Grand Area Grand Erie Area Ottawa Bluewater Area Niagara Area Lambton Kent Area Bluewater Area Niagara Area Kenora Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area Upper Canada Area Rainbow Area Halton Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Ottawa Avon Maitland Area Durham Area Rainbow Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Avon Maitland Area Algoma Area Avon Maitland Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Grand Area Trillium Lakelands Area Ottawa Durham Area Durham Area Niagara Area Upper Grand Area Grand Erie Area Ontario North East Area Halton Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Upper Canada Area Rainbow Area Bluewater Area Greater Essex Area Hastings-Limestone Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Canada Area Simcoe County Area Bluewater Area Thames Valley Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Ontario North East Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Simcoe County Area Simcoe County Area Greater Essex Area York Area Waterloo Area Rainbow Area Simcoe County Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Rainbow Area Near North Area Hastings-Limestone Area Upper Canada Area Lambton Kent Area Greater Essex Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Grand Erie Area Simcoe County Area Niagara Area Ottawa Simcoe County Area Upper Canada Area Renfrew County Area Thames Valley Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Upper Grand Area Lambton Kent Area Thames Valley Area Kenora Area Avon Maitland Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Grand Erie Area Trillium Lakelands Area Bluewater Area Thames Valley Area Renfrew County Area Simcoe County Area Upper Canada Area Hastings-Limestone Area Algoma Area Waterloo Area Simcoe County Area Upper Grand Area Thames Valley Area Upper Canada Area Greater Essex Area Kenora Area Near North Area Ontario North East Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area .

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 17 List of cities and geographical areas City Geographical area City Geographical area Hillsburgh Hillsdale Holland Centre Holland Landing Holstein Huntsville Huttonville Ilderton Ingersoll Ingleside Inglewood Innerkip Innisfil Iroquois Jarvis Jordan Kakabeka Falls Kanata Kapuskasing Keene Kemptville Kenora Keswick Kettleby Kilbride Killaloe Kincardine King City Kingston Kingsville Kintore Kirkfield Kirkland Lake Kitchener Komoka Lakefield Langton Lansdowne LaSalle Leamington Lefroy Levack Lindsay Linwood Lion’s Head Listowel Little Britain Little Current Lively Lombardy London Long Sault Loretto L’Orignal Lucan Lucknow Lyn Lyndhurst Madoc Mallorytown Manotick Maple Marathon Markdale Markham Markstay Marmora Massey Maxville Maxwell McGregor Meaford Merlin Merrickville Metcalfe Midhurst Midland Mildmay Millbrook Milton Milverton Mindemoya Minden Minesing Mississauga Mitchell Moonstone Moorefield Moose Factory Moosonee Morrisburg Mount Albert Mount Forest Mount Hope Mount Pleasant Mt. Brydges Murillo Napanee Navan Nepean New Dundee New Hamburg New Liskeard New Lowell Newburgh Newcastle Upper Canada Area Thames Valley Area Avon Maitland Area Upper Canada Area Upper Canada Area Hastings-Limestone Area Upper Canada Area Ottawa York Area Superior-Greenstone Area Bluewater Area York Area Rainbow Area Hastings-Limestone Area Rainbow Area Upper Canada Area Bluewater Area Greater Essex Area Bluewater Area Lambton Kent Area Upper Canada Area Ottawa Simcoe County Area Simcoe County Area Bluewater Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Halton Area Avon Maitland Area Rainbow Area Trillium Lakelands Area Simcoe County Area Mississauga Avon Maitland Area Simcoe County Area Upper Grand Area Ontario North East Area Ontario North East Area Upper Canada Area York Area Upper Grand Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Lakehead Area Hastings-Limestone Area Ottawa Ottawa Thames Valley Area Waterloo Area Ontario North East Area Simcoe County Area Hastings-Limestone Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Grand Area Simcoe County Area Bluewater Area York Area Bluewater Area Trillium Lakelands Area Peel Area Thames Valley Area Thames Valley Area Upper Canada Area Peel Area Thames Valley Area Simcoe County Area Upper Canada Area Grand Erie Area Niagara Area Lakehead Area Ottawa Ontario North East Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Canada Area Kenora Area York Area York Area Halton Area Renfrew County Area Bluewater Area York Area Kingston Greater Essex Area Thames Valley Area Trillium Lakelands Area Ontario North East Area Kitchener Thames Valley Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Grand Erie Area Upper Canada Area Greater Essex Area Greater Essex Area Simcoe County Area Rainbow Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Waterloo Area Bluewater Area Avon Maitland Area Trillium Lakelands Area Rainbow Area Rainbow Area Upper Canada Area London Upper Canada Area Simcoe County Area .

Marie Schomberg Schumacher Scotland Seaforth Sebringville Selby Severn Bridge Shakespeare Shannonville Shanty Bay Sharon Sheffield Shelburne Simcoe Sioux Lookout Smiths Falls Smithville South Mountain South River Southwold Sparta Springfield St Anns St Catharines St Clair Beach St Clements St George St Jacobs St Marys St Pauls St Thomas St. Andrew’s West Stayner Stevensville St-Isidore Stittsville Durham Area Kenora Area Renfrew County Area Ottawa York Area Lambton Kent Area Bluewater Area Greater Essex Area Upper Canada Area Upper Grand Area Thames Valley Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Canada Area Greater Essex Area Durham Area Lambton Kent Area Algoma Area York Area Ontario North East Area Grand Erie Area Avon Maitland Area Avon Maitland Area Hastings-Limestone Area Simcoe County Area Avon Maitland Area Hastings-Limestone Area Simcoe County Area York Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Upper Grand Area Grand Erie Area Kenora Area Upper Canada Area Niagara Area Upper Canada Area Near North Area Thames Valley Area Thames Valley Area Thames Valley Area Niagara Area St Catharines Greater Essex Area Waterloo Area Grand Erie Area Waterloo Area Avon Maitland Area Avon Maitland Area Thames Valley Area Upper Canada Area Simcoe County Area Niagara Area Upper Canada Area Ottawa York Area Niagara Area Niagara Area York Area Near North Area Upper Canada Area Thames Valley Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Halton Area Trillium Lakelands Area Hastings-Limestone Area Grand Erie Area Upper Grand Area Simcoe County Area Ottawa Simcoe County Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Upper Grand Area Ottawa Durham Area Ottawa Bluewater Area Lambton Kent Area Peel Area Upper Grand Area Grand Erie Area Near North Area York Area Renfrew County Area Simcoe County Area Upper Canada Area Hastings-Limestone Area Renfrew County Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Lambton Kent Area Durham Area Hastings-Limestone Area Upper Canada Area Thames Valley Area Lambton Kent Area Ontario North East Area Thames Valley Area Trillium Lakelands Area Niagara Area Grand Erie Area Bluewater Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Lambton Kent Area Durham Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Near North Area Upper Canada Area .18 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 List of cities and geographical areas City Geographical area City Geographical area Newmarket Niagara Falls Niagara-on-the-Lake Nobleton North Bay North Lancaster Norwich Norwood Oakville Oakwood Odessa Ohsweken Orangeville Orillia Orléans Oro Station Orono Orton Osgoode Oshawa Ottawa Owen Sound Pain Court Palgrave Palmerston Paris Parry Sound Pefferlaw Pembroke Penetanguishene Perth Perth Road Petawawa Peterborough Petrolia Pickering Picton Plantagenet Plattsville Point Edward Porcupine Port Burwell Port Carling Port Colborne Port Dover Port Elgin Port Hope Port Lambton Port Perry Port Rowan Port Stanley Powassan Prescott Prince Albert Red Lake Renfrew Richmond Richmond Hill Ridgetown Ripley River Canard Rockland Rockwood Rodney Roseneath Russell Ruthven Sandford Sarnia Sault Ste.

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 19 List of cities and geographical areas City Geographical area City Geographical area Stoney Creek Stouffville Straffordville Stratford Strathroy Sturgeon Falls Sudbury Sunderland Sundridge Sutton West Sydenham Tamworth Tara Tavistock Tecumseh Teeterville Thamesford Thamesville Thornbury Thorndale Thornhill Thorold Thunder Bay Tilbury Tillsonburg Timmins Toledo Toronto Tottenham Trenton Tweed Tyendinaga Territory Unionville Utterson Uxbridge Val Caron Vanier Vankleek Hill Vaughan Verner Verona Victoria Harbour Vineland Virgil Wainfleet Walkerton Wallaceburg Warkworth Warsaw Wasaga Beach Washago Waterdown Waterford Waterloo Watford Waubaushene Wawa Welland Wellesley Wellington Wheatley Whitby Wiarton Williamstown Winchester Windsor Wingham Winona Woodbridge Woodlawn Woodstock Woodville Wyevale York Upper Canada Area York Area Near North Area Hastings-Limestone Area Simcoe County Area Niagara Area Niagara Area Niagara Area Bluewater Area Lambton Kent Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Kawartha Pine Ridge Area Simcoe County Area Simcoe County Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area Grand Erie Area Waterloo Area Lambton Kent Area Simcoe County Area Algoma Area Niagara Area Waterloo Area Hastings-Limestone Area Greater Essex Area Durham Area Bluewater Area Upper Canada Area Upper Canada Area Greater Essex Area Avon Maitland Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area York Area Ottawa Thames Valley Area Trillium Lakelands Area Simcoe County Area Grand Erie Area Hamilton-Wentworth Area York Area Thames Valley Area Avon Maitland Area Thames Valley Area Near North Area Rainbow Area Durham Area Near North Area York Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area Bluewater Area Thames Valley Area Greater Essex Area Grand Erie Area Thames Valley Area Lambton Kent Area Bluewater Area Thames Valley Area York Area Niagara Area Lakehead Area Lambton Kent Area Thames Valley Area Ontario North East Area Upper Canada Area Toronto Simcoe County Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area Hastings-Limestone Area York Area Trillium Lakelands Area Durham Area Rainbow Area Ottawa .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Hastings-Limestone Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Simcoe County Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Index of geographical areas Geographical area Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Page Geographical area Page Algoma Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Niagara Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 Halton Area . . 47 Kingston . . . . . . . . . . 116 Waterloo Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 London . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Lakehead Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 Toronto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Kenora Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 Bluewater Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 Thames Valley Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Peel Area . . . . . . . . . 93 Overseas . . . . . . . . . . 149 Superior-Greenstone Area . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 Kawartha Pine Ridge Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Grand Erie Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 Ottawa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 St Catharines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 Upper Canada Area . . . . 175 Near North Area . . . . . . . 191 Avon Maitland Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Durham Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 Hamilton-Wentworth Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 Kitchener . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 Barrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 Brantford . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 Greater Essex Area . . . . . . . . . . . 177 Ontario North East Area . . . . . . . . . . 189 Upper Grand Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 York Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Mississauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Trillium Lakelands Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Renfrew County Area . . . . . . 95 Rainbow Area . . . 138 Lambton Kent Area . .

9 n/a 6.5 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.6 — F 0.8 2.000: -0.7 2.400: 0.5 2.6 2.1 E M 0.8 Overall rank: 1838/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.8 53.0 26.4 p Overall rating out of 10 3 4.7 — 1.3 F 0.6 2.9 n/a 3.9 2.8 3.4 2.5 6.5 n/a 2.1 5.2 q Writing 2.1 F 0.9 20. level: Reading 2.1 3 2.9 Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 n/a 43.700: -1.3 5.7 Writing 2.6 — Math E M 0.6 2.6 2.0 1.8 2.3 49.5 5.9 49.0 — Beau Valley [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 5.7 F 0.9 25.4 2.5 2.8 — 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.3 5.1 — Tests below standard (%) 46.7 2.7 q 11.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.7 3.9 37.3 2.2 F 0.1 F 0.8 0.7 2.0 44.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 — 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.1 2.8 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Gr 6 avg.6 Writing 2.9 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2. inc.3 F 0.4 41.7 29.8 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 2. inc.7 2.6 3.2 — F 0.8 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.8 2.2 2.1 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 14.4 8.5 Overall rank: 1723/2742 2101/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.3 F 0.3 — Bayview Heights [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 1.8 8.2 4.7 Overall rank: 1357/2742 2218/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.5 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 32.6 2.6 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 Math 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 2.1 6.9 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.6 2.6 — 2.6 2. of $54.2 F 0.9 3.7 2.5 6.2 2.7 4.8 — Math 2.6 2.7 2.4 F 0.2 C E Broughton [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 0.8 — Math 2.6 39.6 n/a Writing 2.6 2.3 34.6 7.7 2.8 2.8 — Writing 2.7 Math 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a 2.6 6.6 2. of $95.1 — Bolton C Falby [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 4.4 6.6 2.9 0.7 2.1 n/a n/a M 0.800: -1.6 2.2 M 0. of $60.7 2. inc.1 3.5 45.6 n/a Math n/a 2.5 n/a 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 51.8 3.1 6.3 2.8 — Math 2.9 2.2 M 0.3 2.8 2.0 0. inc.9 Gr 6 avg.0 23.2 E — Math M 0.8 2.5 — Math 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 5.3 17.7 2.2 2.2 q Bellwood [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 4.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 F 0.1 4.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.2 F 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 42.4 2.5 31.6 p Tests not written (%) 28.5 Gr 6 avg.9 n/a 2.7 2.3 26.8 2.2 — 35.5 2.7 Math 2.0 2.2 30.5 22.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.6 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.7 2.4 3.7 58.5 — Bobby Orr [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 5.7 5.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.2 M 0.7 — 2.2 — F 0.3 2.4 2.7 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.1 0.6 2.3 6.7 3.5 2.9 2.1 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 64.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 30.3 2.7 — 2.0 3.2 2. of $51. level: Reading 2.4 — Writing 2.0 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Special needs (%): 26.4 5.4 2.2 n/a n/a 35.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.9 2.6 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.1 5. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 39. inc.7 2. of $70. of $77.9 2.6 q Writing 2.7 n/a 2.5 — 2.600: 0.7 2.6 2.7 2.2 M 0.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.0 2.1 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 6 Alexander Graham Bell [Public] Ajax Gr 6 enrollment: 94 ESL (%): 0.1 1.1 F 0.9 6.6 3.3 F 0. of $71.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 M 0.7 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 2.0 2.4 2. inc. level: Reading 2.9 5.5 2.1 F 0.500: -0.8 2.0 5.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 M 0.0 — 5.7 Writing 2.2 2.4 F 0.2 M 0. of $96.3 2.0 Special needs (%): 16.6 2.9 — Math 2.2 — F 0.0 1.8 10.2 F 0.8 — 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.5 2.8 q Gr 6 enrollment: 81 Special needs (%): 7. level: Reading 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.0 1. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.1 F 0. inc.300: -0.9 2.8 2.8 Writing 2.9 2.9 28.8 2.9 2.6 n/a Math n/a E M 0.1 3.9 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 13.8 3.8 3.7 — Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 16.4 19.5 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.9 3.4 q Writing 3.7 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 21 Toronto and surrounding area DURHAM AREA Adelaide Mclaughlin [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 0. of $50.3 n/a 2.0 2.6 2.3 F 0.2 F 0.3 2.0 2.2 25.9 2.1 F 0.1 F 0.3 Tests not written (%) 12.2 n/a M 0.6 2.0 2.7 Tests not written (%) 2.8 2.8 3.0 38.6 — Writing 2.7 2.7 7.0 2. level: Reading 2.3 25.6 2.8 — Writing 2.4 54.5 0.3 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2.5 2.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.0 5.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.2 2. level: Reading 2.3 q Tests not written (%) 11.9 0.7 Overall rank: 1156/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 39.6 2.5 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 Math M 0.7 — Math 2.7 — F 0.0 2.6 2.8 — Writing 2.0 — 2.5 — 5.8 2.4 n/a 2.8 0.7 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 36.7 2.3 F 0.3 q 2.3 2.9 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 41. level: Reading 2.2 E E E n/a 31.4 F 0.8 10.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $92.4 2.8 2.3 6.1 M 0.5 2.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.3 Writing 2.5 2.3 16.9 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.6 q Math 3.0 Overall rank: 714/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 1.8 2.4 2.1 Overall rank: 1499/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.8 2.8 n/a 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.8 2.6 Overall rank: 2035/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — 2.2 E F 0.2 2.6 2.7 3.7 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.4 2.7 2. of $77.9 — Gr 6 avg. inc.8 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.2 n/a 2.6 2.2 Beaverton [Public] Beaverton Gr 6 enrollment: 17 ESL (%): 0.9 2.6 2.4 38.4 n/a 2.9 — Writing 2.6 2.8 — 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.7 2.4 — 35.7 2.5 2.3 2.9 7.2 7.4 3.4 E n/a F 0.4 2.8 4.4 5.4 2. inc.5 — Writing 2.7 4.2 q F 0.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 0.6 2.1 7.6 2. of $85.4 F 0.4 2.7 2.7 p Writing 2.5 6. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Applecroft [Public] Ajax Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.3 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 25.2 34.3 2.0 0.5 2.4 Tests not written (%) 9.1 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.6 Math 2.7 Overall rank: 787/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.1 E F 0.3 1.9 2.7 2.0 n/a F 0.6 — Gr 6 avg.6 — 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.1 M 0.5 F 0.7 2.1 n/a Math M 0.2 F 0.1 2.8 p Math 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.4 — 2.6 2.1 F 0.0 1.2 34.4 q 2.8 11.8 29.3 37.8 2.0 — 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 7.5 4.6 Math 2.6 2.2 2.3 — Math F 0.0 Special needs (%): 17.8 2.8 2.2 54. inc.2 M 0.8 2.0 — 5.7 2.6 2.6 Math F 0.2 F 0.9 q Brooklin Village [Public] Brooklin Gr 6 enrollment: 52 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.2 32.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 — Math 3.4 54.3 28.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 30.400: 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.3 2.8 2.6 2.8 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 Writing 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.6 2.6 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.7 8. inc.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 n/a Brother Andre [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 7.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.1 2.2 0. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2.2 7.6 q 2.2 F 0.8 1.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.4 — Math M 0.2 24.0 4.0 — Writing 3.6 Special needs (%): 12.6 q Math 3.100: 0.1 7.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.2 0.3 5.6 M 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 2. level: Reading 2.3 3.9 — Math 2.4 F 0.4 n/a 11.3 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading E M 0. level: Reading 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. of $73.4 31.6 2.3 3.3 M 0.4 F 0.6 2.3 q F 0.8 2.3 22.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 32.0 61.7 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 — Tests below standard (%) 28.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.400: 0.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a F 0.0 33.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.6 2.8 — Math 2.3 5.2 0. of $40.2 F 0.1 p Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 23.7 q 2.9 25.0 Special needs (%): 11.4 Math F 0.9 5.8 2.4 45.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 Math 2.3 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.5 2.400: -1.3 0.4 2.1 34.9 2.0 3.8 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.7 11.2 F 0.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.8 6.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a E n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 66.9 — 5.7 F 0.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 8.9 29.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a Math n/a E F 0.1 2.0 2.8 2.6 Writing 2.6 0.4 2.7 2.1 — Math F 0.0 7.0 0.6 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 4.3 M 0.0 3.000: 0.3 F 0.7 — Math 2.0 — Writing 3.5 M 0.1 38.6 Math 2.2 41. level: Reading 2.9 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 E p 33.9 Math 2.6 — Cadarackque [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.6 — Writing 2.9 2.9 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 9.1 F 0.6 2.6 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 9.0 35.6 2.5 2.4 2.900: 0.7 2.5 2.0 41.5 — Writing 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.9 7.9 n/a Altona Forest [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.0 p Overall rating out of 10 8.9 2.8 4.0 Special needs (%): 18.3 — .8 n/a Math 2.7 2.1 M 0.5 2.6 2.3 E F 0.6 5.1 n/a 4. inc.6 6.5 2.5 2.3 M 0.6 2.4 F 0.7 — Math 2.3 M 0.6 2.8 2.7 5.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 44.4 2.6 2.1 — Athabasca Street [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 0.0 2.0 0.6 2.7 — 2.4 9.8 2.1 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.8 n/a Math 2.0 — 11.1 F 0.0 46.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 — 0. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.700: 1.1 F 0.9 n/a Writing 2.1 q Tests not written (%) 14.8 6.0 n/a 2.3 M 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.3 3.6 — 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.000: -0.1 6.0 n/a 2.5 2.2 5.6 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) 6.7 M 0.4 2.7 — Writing 2. of $77. inc.7 2.4 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.7 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.8 3.6 2.

6 2.8 7.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 0.2 Gr 6 avg.9 4.3 2.8 43.2 F 0.2 16.7 2.6 21.8 — Math 2.5 2. of $117.9 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.0 0.0 — 4.3 M 0.9 — 2.700: -0.2 2. inc.5 4.9 2.2 — F 0.5 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.3 F 0.9 2.0 3.1 — Gr 6 avg. inc.0 2.5 6. level: Reading 2.7 2.4 — 2.9 2.8 2.1 M 0. of $87.9 2.0 0.6 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.3 5.3 q 2.1 E M 0.6 Math 2.1 Math 3.9 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 q 2.9 2.0 — Colonel J E Farewell [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 0.5 2.3 32.8 25.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 40.2 M 0.9 2.2 2.0 34.7 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.6 2.1 F 0.9 2.8 3.9 2.5 0.4 2.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 13.0 Special needs (%): 6.6 — Gr 6 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.5 21.0 — 3.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.1 27.9 2.0 22.7 2.7 2.6 3.7 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 35.5 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2530/2742 2218/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — 3.9 p 4.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.4 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 12.5 — F 0.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 43.8 — Math 2.4 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 28. of $60. of $98.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 21 Special needs (%): 23.9 3.2 2.3 3. inc.4 Writing 2.9 2.0 0.8 2.8 2.9 — 2.8 — 3.8 2. of $96. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.4 1.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 — 0.1 E — Math M 0.8 2.7 8.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 1.4 Math 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 3.8 26.3 Writing 2.4 5.1 — M 0.9 2.700: 0.8 2.5 57.1 F 0.9 3.1 6.2 0.8 3.0 2.8 20.8 2.9 2.9 7.5 2.3 — 8.1 M 0.6 F 0.4 6.4 2.8 6 6.8 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 1. of $71.5 Math 2.1 p 3 3.1 29.0 2.3 — E F 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — F 0.0 3.5 56.8 2.7 23.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 4.1 6. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 5.6 Math 2.6 — Writing 2.6 2.1 F 0.0 — 6.8 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — F 0.8 p Writing 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 1.1 p F 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Math 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 21.4 Math F 0.8 — 3.8 2.3 Writing 2.5 7. level: Reading 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 6.7 — 2.1 F 0.0 27.9 — 2.4 2.9 3.4 2.3 2.9 2.2 7.0 3.2 2.9 Tests not written (%) 5.5 — Overall rating out of 10 1.4 0.9 40.9 3.9 — 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.3 28. level: Reading 2.4 — Eagle Ridge [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.6 5.0 2.7 — F 0.7 — 2.2 M 0. of $40.8 — Math 3.5 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 6 7.3 2.5 Tests not written (%) 2. of $113.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 F 0.1 3.1 2.5 4.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 79 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.1 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.6 4.4 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.4 F 0.5 2.8 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.5 2.8 29.0 Writing 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.200: 0.1 Math M 0.8 2.6 2.1 2.7 2.0 Tests not written (%) 7.7 Math 2.7 Tests not written (%) 3.8 — Writing 2.9 2.5 — 11.9 Overall rank: 573/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.9 2.7 1.1 p 2.5 32.0 38.5 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.7 — 2.8 2.2 E F 0.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 61.7 — 2.5 52.0 — 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.4 26.700: 1.0 2.2 2.9 2.8 — 3.5 2.3 E F 0.9 2.6 2.2 — 28.5 Math 2.9 7.9 2.8 Tests not written (%) 8.1 — Tests below standard (%) 47.8 — 2. of $65.7 — .4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 20 Special needs (%): 15.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.0 — 6 4.5 2.0 2.9 31.1 M 0.6 — M 0.0 28.6 2.6 0.5 M 0.000: -1.4 — Cartwright Central [Public] Blackstock Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 0.0 Math 2.8 5.7 — Writing 2.9 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 3. level: Reading 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.3 6.2 23.4 2.3 Overall rank: 714/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 4.8 2.3 E F 0.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 F 0.8 3.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.9 — Math 2.0 2.3 2.2 — 8.5 — Writing 2.3 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Dr C F Cannon [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.8 2.3 Overall rank: 2146/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — 2.9 23.6 0.4 2.6 Math F 0.1 2.0 2.8 2. of $96. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.9 2.7 Writing 2.7 2.7 2.0 2.8 3.0 0.0 — 2.9 2.200: 0.100: 0. level: Reading 2.7 — Writing 2. inc.7 — Math 1.5 Gr 6 avg.8 Math 3.8 3.2 E F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.6 46.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.600: -0.2 2.1 — 21.9 2.2 E F 0.6 2.6 Math 2.1 3.5 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.9 — Math 2. inc.8 2.0 3.6 Math 2.1 7 7 7 7. level: Reading 2.8 — F 0.9 — Writing 2.0 2.8 — Carruthers Creek [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 1.9 Math 3.6 2.7 Math 3.7 Writing 2.8 — 2.3 27.5 5.9 2.9 4.0 0.9 2. of $64.8 2.800: -0.4 7.8 4.5 — E F 0.9 Writing 2.4 2.0 2.1 — Math M 0. of $73.2 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 5.8 2.4 2.700: -2.9 3.5 5.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Gr 6 avg.1 2.8 2.400: -0. inc.9 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 2.3 0.3 37.7 2.0 7.1 M 0.5 — 55.5 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 E F 0.0 3.8 2.3 2.5 Writing 2.1 2.5 M 0.4 M 0.5 1.0 0.2 n/a F 0.3 2.0 — Math 2.7 3.8 Writing 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.8 2.7 Math 2.5 2.4 26.5 2.4 F 0.3 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 2057/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.7 Writing 2.3 F 0.8 1.5 38.7 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 4. of $79.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 — Math 2.9 31.0 25.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 Special needs (%): 6.8 2.1 — 4.4 2.0 3.7 2.9 — 2. inc.6 — 2.2 — Math M 0.6 2.1 — Dr Roberta Bondar [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.4 2.1 5.7 2.0 2.0 2.1 22.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2. inc.3 2.8 2.0 2. inc.9 2.800: -0.9 — Gr 6 avg.5 Writing 2.9 3.0 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 3.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 17.7 2.5 Overall rank: 787/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.1 5.5 — 3.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 Math 2.5 — Math 2.0 23.5 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.6 — Coronation [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.0 Tests not written (%) 7.6 2.1 F 0.4 2.3 E E F 0. of $110.9 — Writing 3.8 2.8 3.1 F 0.9 Writing 2.7 — 2.2 — 7.6 2. level: Reading 2.22 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Captain Michael VandenBos [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 89 ESL (%): 0.2 6.6 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.2 M 0. inc.7 2.7 2.8 3.5 7.8 2.9 2.5 2.6 4.3 F 0.3 M 0.7 — Math 2.5 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 34. level: Reading 2.3 — 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.3 — M 0.7 2.2 F 0.0 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 37.9 0.0 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 7.8 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 avg.2 2.5 7.2 0.8 2.1 F 0.1 2.3 n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.3 — 33.6 Math 2.1 — 27.2 Math M 0.0 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — Writing 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.8 — Writing 2.7 2.5 2.8 4.8 2.4 4.3 2.3 M 0.1 — Math M 0.1 Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 — Writing 2.3 E F 0.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — 2.0 p 8.7 — 2.2 M 0.6 p Dr S J Phillips [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.9 55.6 — F 0.5 2.4 5.2 2.6 — 3.5 2.3 — Duke of Edinburgh [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 0.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.8 3.4 2.0 3.5 E F 0.7 q 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 35.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 — Duffin’s Bay [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 40.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.1 24.800: -1.1 n/a E n/a n/a 19.8 2.6 2.6 — Corpus-Christi [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 9.8 2.9 Writing 2.8 — Math 2.8 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 20. level: Reading 2.5 2.1 Math M 0.2 n/a n/a E n/a F 0.3 19.7 Overall rank: 1215/2742 2153/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.9 2. inc.6 2.3 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.6 n/a n/a M 0.3 q F 0.6 Writing 2.5 19.5 2.0 3.4 6.9 — 2.7 1.3 p College Hill [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.8 2.3 2.4 0.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 49.6 2.8 3.9 2.6 2.4 61.1 54.9 2.2 F 0.9 2.8 — 2.3 31.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.1 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 27.1 — 6.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.6 45.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.1 — 6.4 49.9 3.1 2.3 F 0.500: 0.8 — 2.8 q Math 3.7 2.9 Writing 2.6 — 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 Writing 3.3 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 F 0.7 2.7 2.0 3.2 27.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 52.3 7. inc.0 2.1 2. level: Reading 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 11.0 3.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.3 4.3 45.3 2.0 — 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.1 Overall rank: 964/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $53.3 6.7 2.6 2.1 M 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.8 2.8 — 2.4 — Claremont [Public] Claremont Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 0.1 7.500: 0.4 Math 2.9 3.5 F 0.5 2.6 Gr 6 avg.2 n/a n/a 12.0 22.2 F 0.3 2.9 Dr Robert Thornton [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.0 Special needs (%): 16.5 Writing 2.7 3.9 2.6 — 2.7 — 2. inc.5 Writing 2.1 2.1 M 0.0 0.9 3.5 F 0.7 3.0 53.9 2.3 F 0.7 2.0 0.0 — 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.8 2.0 Tests not written (%) 10.6 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 — 2.8 5.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 — 29.3 0.9 — 2.6 2.0 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 — Writing 2.8 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 — F 0.2 2.0 — 6.2 E M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.7 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.7 3.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 38.7 2.9 2.6 — 2.7 — 10.

8 19.5 2.9 2.5 2.3 3.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 6. level: Reading 2.5 29.8 — Math 2.9 2. inc.7 2.5 — 1.9 n/a Math 2.0 1.8 5.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 31.2 M 0.8 2.1 3.4 2.9 2.7 Overall rank: 964/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — 2.7 20.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 42. level: Reading 2.1 — 2.1 Special needs (%): 23.7 5.4 — F 0.8 — Overall rating out of 10 4.3 F 0.8 2.7 3.8 4 1.0 2.000: 0. level: Reading 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 34.0 2.1 q 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0. inc.3 2.5 29.0 3.1 Math M 0.1 Writing 3.9 3.7 65. level: Reading 2.3 26.7 2.6 5.8 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.9 3.2 2.9 2.6 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 4.5 2.7 2.0 3.6 2.2 — 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 — n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a 35.6 2.400: -0.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 n/a E n/a M 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 32.3 3.7 2.5 2.1 3.2 1.2 Math 3.7 2.7 2.8 2.0 0.0 3.8 n/a Writing 2. level: Reading 3.4 26.2 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.7 44.4 — Tests not written (%) 15.0 2.4 6. level: Reading 2.3 Math 2.9 3.4 Math 2.8 2. inc.3 2.6 q Writing 3. inc.9 Tests not written (%) 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2. of $115.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E F 0.9 2.3 6.9 7.1 3.3 Overall rank: 573/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 q 3.0 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.7 2.2 — Fairport Beach [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.2 p n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 16. inc.0 0.0 3.9 — 2.9 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 12.8 3. level: Reading 3.8 2.7 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Math M 0.1 E E F 0.6 — Math 2.6 — Math 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.1 21.4 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Earl A Fairman [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 0. of $70.1 9.9 n/a Math 2.3 — 2.1 n/a 60.6 2.9 — F 0.9 Math 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.0 — 5.1 2.6 Math 2.0 — 2.6 2.1 3.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 13.4 2.5 — 2.2 — 3.6 n/a Writing 2.6 — 2.7 2.1 Writing 3.5 7.7 2 2.4 2.0 4.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 — 15.8 2.0 p 1 0.6 n/a 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.6 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Writing 2.0 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.0 2.7 — Math 3.9 — Writing 2.7 3.9 2.7 2.3 2.6 Writing 2.7 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 11.2 p Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.6 6.4 Writing 2.8 2.4 2.5 2.4 p 2.5 q 2.1 2.6 — 23. inc.1 M 0.8 — 23 Gandatsetiagon [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.1 n/a 2.5 8. level: Reading 2.3 2.8 2.6 2.3 14.9 3.3 q Tests below standard (%) 34.2 F 0.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 47.4 2.0 p 11.8 46.8 47.6 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.5 2. level: Reading 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 64.3 5.7 2.1 7.1 3.6 — 12.4 0.5 51.7 p 2.3 Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 5.7 44.7 2.200: 1.8 6.4 7.9 6.7 2.4 — 7.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 7 8.2 — 3.9 2. of $115. of $90.6 2.9 2.8 2.1 3.1 Math M 0.5 — 3.5 2.9 4.9 3.1 3.5 q Writing 2.2 7.4 2. inc.9 2.6 6.5 Writing 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a M 0.4 1.5 40.8 26.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 19 Special needs (%): 10.2 Math M 0.5 Overall rank: 2284/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Special needs (%): 10.5 Math 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 67.2 3.2 F 0.1 2.6 2.7 5. of $77.200: 0.4 q 2.1 3.6 3.8 — 2. inc.2 2.8 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 5.5 2.1 3.6 6.1 — Writing 2.3 Math M 0.0 n/a 2.8 26. level: Reading 2.1 4.2 2.6 1.4 3.6 2.8 2.7 2.3 20.6 2.9 — Gertrude Colpus [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0. of $35.0 3.1 Math 3.5 1.8 Overall rating out of 10 2.7 2.3 26.9 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 61.7 — Goodwood [Public] Goodwood ESL (%): 0.8 — .2 F 0.900: -0.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 avg.7 3.2 2.900: 0.1 F 0.9 3.3 3.6 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2621/2742 2303/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.3 n/a 0. of $80.9 p 2.0 — Gordon B Attersley [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 0.3 Math 2.0 p E F 0.5 2.4 2.8 — 2.3 2.3 — 2. of $56.2 50.7 5.7 5.2 2.6 27.5 2. of $49.5 2.1 n/a 3.0 2.9 2. inc.8 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.5 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.3 2.7 2.6 2.4 17.1 21.7 2.9 Writing 2.6 — Greenbank/Epsom [Public] Greenbank Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.8 2.1 M 0.0 3.3 5.9 48.8 — Tests not written (%) 4.8 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.9 q 2.0 Special needs (%): 27.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 27.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 58/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 — 2.6 2.7 2.8 — 2.7 2.9 n/a 2.7 — Writing 2.7 2.1 3.4 E F 0.2 13.4 2.6 2.8 2.3 23.1 n/a F 0.2 p 5.1 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.1 2.5 — Grandview [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.3 3.7 5.3 30.1 37.9 Tests not written (%) 12.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Writing 2.0 — 2.0 Special needs (%): 27.6 1.7 — 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2436/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 4.7 3.4 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.7 48.3 Gr 6 avg.6 — Math 2.5 19.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.1 18.2 F 0.4 7.9 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.1 2.9 2.4 n/a Father Joseph Venini [Catholic] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 Writing 2.5 3.0 3.4 M 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — 24.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 7.8 2.1 0.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 Overall rank: 438/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.100: -1.8 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 20.2 6.9 3.2 46.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 4.5 Tests not written (%) 13.9 — 3.8 2.1 F 0.1 — 9.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.6 2.6 — 14.7 q Harmony Heights [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 0.5 2.9 2.5 — 2.6 2.8 18.1 M 0.1 Math M 0.9 2.5 2.0 3.1 n/a 22.4 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.4 Math 2.1 3.8 — Math 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 Special needs (%): 8.5 2.7 q 12.4 — Writing 2.7 2.4 3.7 3.8 Math 2.0 3.8 Gr 6 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.1 67.2 69.800: -0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.1 6 6.0 3.5 0.5 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.9 Writing 2.7 3. of $100.2 2.3 F 0.2 — 2.7 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 2.8 2.4 M 0.2 — M 0.0 2.1 Tests not written (%) 10.1 M 0.3 M 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 5.7 — Glengrove [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 1.6 2.2 60.0 — 2.2 17.0 2.1 E F 0.1 2.7 5.7 — Writing 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.7 2.2 — Writing 2.1 E F 0.8 3.6 2.5 6.0 2. inc.6 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.0 3.4 n/a n/a M 0.4 2.9 2.9 9.1 F 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 E F 0.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 49. level: Reading 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 — Elizabeth B Phin [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 2.1 46.9 0.8 — Writing 2.5 40.800: 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 9.3 2.2 n/a F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a n/a Math M 0.6 Gr 6 avg.1 29.6 2.4 2.1 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 Gr 6 avg.7 — Math 2.7 3.1 — Math E M 0.8 2.1 — 9.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.7 2.1 p E F 0.5 — 2.5 2.2 M 0.9 Writing 3.1 F 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.8 — Math 2.9 Writing 2.6 2.0 2.6 4.9 — Gr 6 avg.2 2.6 1.9 7.7 2.7 7.5 2.7 2.2 Overall rank: 2393/2742 2101/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2720/2742 2334/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 E E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 53.7 51.3 2.4 2.0 3.3 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.3 Gr 6 avg.1 — 3. inc.2 2.1 F 0.1 3.0 — 3.1 0.1 2.2 2.8 F 0.1 p Math 2.5 12.3 2.6 Math 2.5 Math 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 40.0 2.9 2.700: -4.2 9.2 F 0.0 0.7 Tests not written (%) 4.4 2.4 2.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 5.9 2.500: -2.4 F 0.5 4.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 20.0 1.3 7.0 2.1 0.5 F 0.9 2.5 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.2 — 35.8 — 2.3 2.9 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 0.1 E F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $82.2 — 7. inc.7 32.5 4.5 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 7.8 0.0 — 2.1 M 0.9 3.2 F 0.600: 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 18.2 — Tests below standard (%) 41.6 n/a 27.8 2.2 2.6 22.5 2.1 3.8 2.8 n/a 2.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.7 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — Math E M 0.8 3.2 7.8 46.0 3.1 E M 0.0 0.400: -2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 31. of $98.5 — Glen Dhu [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 1.5 2.4 2.4 3.3 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.9 Math 2.6 — Glen Street [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.300: 1.4 2.3 2.4 6.5 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.4 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 F 0.4 25.3 Math 2.3 4. of $54.3 3. level: Reading 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.5 — Writing 2.3 2.2 2.1 F 0.6 2.4 E — M 0. inc.1 Tests below standard (%) 10.1 1.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 8.4 F 0.0 2.5 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 n/a M 0.8 2.3 59.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 6. of $73.6 2.6 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.7 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.100: -1.7 2.7 7.1 — Fallingbrook [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.2 Tests not written (%) 31.6 Writing 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.4 — Math 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 q Math E M 0.4 2.9 Writing 2.0 2.4 3.4 — Writing 2.9 2.2 6.4 2. of $26.9 q E F 0.1 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 12.5 — 22.1 — F 0.4 2.3 2.2 M 0.7 2.8 4.9 2.6 2.3 6.6 24.7 2.0 Math 3.0 — 8.7 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 17.5 Writing 2.5 9.6 Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 q Math 2.5 Tests not written (%) 7.5 2.0 2.7 n/a 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.4 2.3 — 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 — n/a M 0.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 25/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.6 2.6 — Writing 2.7 2.3 — 11.8 p 3.4 Writing 2.2 52.1 F 0.5 5.

4 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 6.6 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 25.9 2.2 8.8 2.6 2.1 31.8 — 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.3 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 39.2 2.8 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 13.0 3.4 Tests not written (%) 11.1 2.4 Tests not written (%) 4. inc.7 q Lester B Pearson [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 8.7 2.5 0.3 2.8 2.7 — 2.4 24.0 0.5 — 2.0 — John XXIII [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.3 q 2.1 F 0.8 — 3.9 6.3 47.4 2.8 4.5 2.9 24.6 2.9 Writing 2.1 E E M 0.8 Writing 2.4 — 11.2 Tests below standard (%) 27. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.7 — Lincoln Alexander [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 7.9 13.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 3.24 Highbush [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.2 M 0.3 Math F 0.4 Math 2.4 Tests not written (%) 3.5 2.2 — 49.4 — F 0.1 3.3 Tests below standard (%) 26.9 2.6 2.6 q 2.8 Math 3.6 57.9 2.5 — 2.9 40.0 n/a Math n/a 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Math 2.4 Gr 6 avg.1 p Writing 2.4 7.6 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 17.8 2.2 2.5 2.2 8 9.6 2.0 0. level: Reading 2.3 3.3 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.9 Math 3.5 28.4 2.9 3.6 2.8 2.8 2.2 — 41. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 2.7 0.8 q 3.8 2.2 — Leslie McFarlane [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 3.7 — 2.8 — F 0.7 41.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 52.7 2.5 — F 0.8 2.6 2. inc.7 2.9 — 2.0 3.7 3.2 23.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 F 0.2 — 6 4.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 3.000: -0.6 2.2 — 20.0 Special needs (%): 9.7 2.9 Writing 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.2 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 38.2 F 0.5 5. of $94.4 2.3 — 2. of $78.6 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.0 3.0 0.1 — Math F 0.6 2.9 p 2.7 2.6 23.6 2.8 Gr 6 avg.9 — 2.3 — 2.5 2.0 Gr 6 avg.7 — F 0.8 — 2.2 F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.1 F 0. of $37.3 F 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 27.2 25.7 q 2.4 — 6.6 Math F 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.8 2.4 5.6 Math 2.8 — 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Special needs (%): 10. of $62. inc. inc.3 2.7 2.4 27.4 F 0.4 3.3 2.7 — 2. of $71.100: 0.6 Writing 2.3 q 11.5 5.2 F 0.6 Writing 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 2.6 2.2 6.9 2.1 q F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Writing 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 23.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 12.1 38.000: 2.000: -1.2 3.8 2.9 2.4 F 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.2 3.700: 2. inc.6 18.6 3.3 — E F 0.8 3.6 2.6 Math 2. of $78.0 — 5.0 0.8 2.9 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.8 — Writing 2.9 2.3 3.2 Tests not written (%) 10.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — Math 2.0 0.2 30. level: Reading 2.4 1.9 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg. of $91.9 24.9 34.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 Math F 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.8 — 2.1 — 3.8 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2. of $93.300: -0. level: Reading 2.9 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.0 6.5 M 0.4 Gr 6 avg.8 Math 2.6 2.4 2.7 Math 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.2 Math M 0.2 2.0 2.0 — 4. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.8 2.6 6.8 — F 0.5 45.6 5.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.8 — 7.4 4.6 2.8 6.7 n/a F 0.9 2.8 2.4 Tests not written (%) 0.8 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.8 6.7 2.7 — Writing 2.0 2.6 2.0 3.6 2.9 Overall rank: 623/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 q 11.8 — 2.3 4.7 Gr 6 avg.3 3.4 M 0.4 1.1 0.0 1.6 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 147/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2.9 17. level: Reading 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 15.6 2.1 8.7 — 6.5 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 75 Special needs (%): 8.2 5.5 q 2.4 2.9 7.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3. of $97.9 — 3.8 2.7 Writing 2. inc.1 3.1 F 0.2 — F 0.6 2.0 — 3.8 2.7 q 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — Math 2.8 27.6 2.0 0.100: 1.9 1.7 5.9 — 2.7 — .8 2.4 2.3 — 27.6 2.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 24.9 Math 3.0 Writing 2.7 2.5 — 9.7 p 6.8 2.8 2.1 F 0. inc.8 — Immaculate Conception [Catholic] Port Perry Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.9 Writing 2.5 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 28.6 2.9 2.7 2.9 3.1 — 26.7 2.8 2.4 58.0 1.1 2.6 17.1 M 0.9 Gr 6 avg.3 n/a n/a 36.2 3.2 Math M 0.6 2.5 2.0 — 7.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.6 Writing 2.7 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 2.5 — F 0.0 0.1 — F 0.8 1.6 q 2.1 3.7 — Math 2.2 — F 0.1 E F 0.1 p Lakewoods [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.9 Writing 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.6 2.8 3. of $76.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.0 2.100: -0.5 3.7 7.8 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.4 q 2.7 2.9 2.1 3.2 E — 21.6 15.8 Math 2.3 F 0.9 — Holy Redeemer [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 72 ESL (%): 5.8 3.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.7 6.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 29.4 6.5 3.3 n/a F 0.8 — 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 8.4 — Jean-Paul II [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.5 2.7 — 2.5 3.2 6.5 2.3 n/a Lakeside [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.3 — 5.2 F 0.2 F 0.0 1.9 — 3.3 2.3 — 27.7 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 n/a E F 0.7 Math 2.5 2.3 3.7 2.7 — 2.8 3.1 2.1 4.3 24. of $63.7 2.6 q F 0.7 2.9 — 2.5 2.7 — 2.3 35.6 2.6 1.3 0.9 8.1 F 0.1 2.5 2.5 7.3 2.1 — M 0.7 — 2.8 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.8 2.2 E — F 0.7 2.2 — John Dryden [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 1.9 — 0.4 2.9 — 7.7 39.9 2.8 — 2.1 2.8 2.7 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.6 Math 3.1 p Math 2.9 p 2.7 Math 2.0 1.2 Math F 0.3 E — F 0.5 2.7 — 2.7 — 3.3 0.9 3.0 3.0 Overall rank: 330/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 39.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 3.3 F 0.7 32. of $98.3 0.7 4.1 — 13. inc.7 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 22.4 2.0 3.1 — E E M 0.7 — 3.6 3.5 3.4 2.4 2.6 Writing 2.8 — 2.7 2.8 2.3 n/a 30.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $62.4 2.8 2.2 M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $79. level: Reading 3.0 5.7 2.3 — 2.3 38.3 M 0.8 — 2.8 2.8 — 2.6 2.6 — Math 2.8 2.4 F 0.2 2.700: -0.5 7.0 Tests not written (%) 11.7 2.4 8.7 28.0 3. level: Reading 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 0.1 n/a F 0.200: 0.8 2.7 2.8 Gr 6 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 4.1 6.8 2.7 2.4 2.9 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 4.2 F 0.0 2.7 — 3.7 35.8 Math 2.1 Tests not written (%) 8.7 2.1 Math M 0.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 97 Special needs (%): 4. level: Reading 2.3 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2367/2742 2153/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.4 2.7 Writing 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.8 Tests not written (%) 8. level: Reading n/a 3.7 2.0 2.0 2.1 F 0.8 Writing 2.0 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 4.1 2.0 p 7.7 2.1 n/a F 0.7 2.7 — 2.3 2.100: -2.7 2. of $91.1 — E E E F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.2 26.7 0.6 — 2.2 Math F 0.7 — 12.6 2.1 3.9 46.2 — 18.6 2.3 F 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 q Jack Miner [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 0.9 2.0 2.4 n/a 34.6 — Hillsdale [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.9 p F 0.9 2.1 Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.5 2.9 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.6 2.2 Writing 2.3 n/a n/a F 0.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 6.1 2.8 Math 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 21.4 2.8 Math 3.0 2.1 37.8 3.2 F 0.8 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 29.1 F 0.8 Writing 2.2 3.7 2.7 8.5 Writing 2.6 Math 2.3 1.3 F 0.7 3.0 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.100: 0.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 — Writing 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.7 — 2.8 2.3 M 0.7 2.8 2.9 3.2 E F 0.7 4.1 2.8 8.4 10.800: -0.3 E F 0.2 3. level: Reading 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.7 6.0 4.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 0.9 2.0 3.8 2.9 3.6 — 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.7 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.9 Writing 2.8 3.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 48.1 p Gr 6 avg.1 3.7 n/a M 0.6 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.1 3.9 3.4 Math 2.2 n/a Math n/a 3. level: Reading 2.1 27.5 23.1 Overall rank: 843/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.1 2.7 2.4 n/a F 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.5 27.9 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3.5 5.5 2.9 3.8 6.7 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.500: 0.9 2.2 25.4 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.6 2.9 — 2.9 2.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 7. inc.4 2.4 40.1 F 0.7 2.4 M 0. inc.9 — Gr 6 avg. inc.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 3.1 5.1 Math M 0.6 Tests not written (%) 0.5 2.4 Writing 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.3 9.2 Tests not written (%) 5.7 — 6.5 q F 0. level: Reading 2.4 7.3 7.5 6.7 2.8 5.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 23. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 66 Special needs (%): 21.5 Math 2.4 F 0.1 23.5 Tests not written (%) 1.7 32.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.7 3.1 3.5 2.8 Writing 2.6 — 2.2 7.1 2.9 — Writing 2.8 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 22.500: -1.9 0.7 Math 2.3 M 0.0 2.7 2. inc.8 2.7 Math 2.7 2.6 Special needs (%): 6.6 2.0 3.0 — 2.5 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 24.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Writing 2.2 5.7 — Writing 2.9 — Joseph Gould [Public] Uxbridge ESL (%): 0.4 13.5 29.9 2.6 2.6 Kedron [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.0 3.0 3.

4 2.5 2.3 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 10.7 2.0 Gr 6 avg.5 — Ormiston [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 3.3 35. level: Reading 2.2 — Math 2. inc.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.9 2.1 8.1 M 0.6 41.8 3.6 n/a Pierre Elliott Trudeau [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 68 ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 5.5 Writing 2.7 F 0.4 29.0 2.8 2.4 49.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.7 — Norman G.6 — Tests not written (%) 8.3 — Nottingham [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 3.7 2.9 — 2.0 q 9.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 36.8 6.7 3.5 27.9 3.0 2.3 50.0 Special needs (%): 17.7 Writing 2.2 32. of $99.0 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.200: -1.6 — McCaskill’s Mills [Public] Cannington Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.5 2.7 3.9 2.1 5.6 2.2 F 0.400: 1. of $96.2 3.0 2.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.4 7.3 — F 0.0 Special needs (%): 28.0 7.7 2.600: -1.4 8 8.7 2.2 M 0.3 2.7 2.500: 0.9 q 2.0 2.5 19.5 q Notre-Dame-de-la-Jeunesse [Catholic] Ajax Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 3.1 M 0.6 2.6 2.7 — 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.4 n/a 39.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.0 2.1 Gr 6 avg.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3. inc. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 25 Lincoln Avenue [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.0 5.1 F 0.9 — Writing 2.8 3.8 2. inc.7 — Writing 2.7 2.0 3.0 2.6 1.0 2.2 6.7 33.9 25.8 Math 3.5 2.0 3.7 2.9 2.6 q 2.2 Math M 0.9 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.1 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 0.8 2.7 3.7 2.0 26.2 M 0.3 F 0.7 3.6 — Math 2.7 — 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.9 2.2 6.6 3.0 2.7 3.300: -0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.1 24.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.1 3.3 F 0.8 Math 2.9 — 2.6 1. inc.3 22.5 F 0.9 2.0 2.1 5.6 — 2.3 Tests not written (%) 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 7.4 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 17. of $91.0 3.7 Math 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.1 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 2.8 23.6 2.9 27.2 E F 0. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2. of $89.0 Overall rating out of 10 5. of $74.3 — 6.4 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.7 2.9 8. of $114.1 2.6 — Math 2.8 3.5 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.8 — 3.2 — 2.7 2.2 2.5 — 2.2 7.1 6.5 4. of $89.7 2.7 2.4 — 2. inc.7 F 0.5 2.3 — 2.700: -0.1 5.8 — 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.3 27.8 2.5 Gr 6 avg.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 15. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 0. of $94.0 2.7 3. inc.8 2.3 3.9 3.9 — 2.8 — 3.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 38.6 2.2 8.0 — Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — Writing 2.1 M 0.8 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a F 0.5 2.8 2.8 2.2 2. level: Reading n/a 2.2 2. level: Reading 2. Powers [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.7 Math 2.1 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8 6.9 3.1 Overall rank: 166/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 14.6 7 6.5 2.8 n/a 2.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.1 E F 0.1 3.6 2.2 3.5 5.9 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.1 — F 0.2 n/a M 0.8 3.0 2.3 3.7 2.8 — Math 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.4 6.8 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 5. inc.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.8 Math 2.5 25.3 0. level: Reading 3. level: Reading n/a 2.1 5.0 Overall rank: 2183/2742 2083/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 — Gr 6 avg. of $63.4 3.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.6 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.6 — Math 2.5 2.5 q Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 — 13.500: 1. level: Reading 3.6 2.0 p Writing 2.0 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 8.6 — 2.9 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 Writing 2.0 3.5 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 46.3 F 0.3 5.5 2.4 17.5 n/a 7.9 2. level: Reading 2.2 8 8 7.9 0.3 Lord Elgin [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.0 2.8 6.7 — M 0.0 2.9 Writing 2.1 — 21.7 0.0 10.0 Special needs (%): 31.1 3.1 11.5 15. level: Reading 2.8 n/a 3.2 n/a F 0.3 33.9 — 2.3 8. inc.8 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 8.5 F 0.8 2.7 2.5 1.8 2.8 1. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 3.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 11.9 3. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.3 F 0.9 2.6 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Writing 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.0 2.300: 0.7 Tests not written (%) 13.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 11.4 Math F 0.8 — Math 2.3 39.1 2.8 3.0 3. inc.8 2.9 2.0 p Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 — F 0.2 F 0.0 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 5 3.7 2.7 4.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 28.0 p Overall rating out of 10 7.4 Overall rating out of 10 8 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 18. of $88.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.7 2.0 20.8 — 7.4 q Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 26.3 8.1 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Pringle Creek [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 0.8 13.4 20.2 26. level: Reading 2.0 12.0 2.4 n/a 5.7 2.6 — F 0.9 2.5 2.1 41.8 2.9 2.2 — M 0.8 n/a 2.7 2.7 2.9 Writing 3.2 0.8 2.1 E n/a F 0.5 8 7.2 20.2 — Writing 2.3 — 35.0 p 5.7 — Math 2.0 2.8 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.7 3.1 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.5 Overall rank: 121/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 — Monsignor Philip Coffey [Catholic] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.8 2.1 F 0. inc.9 2.9 2.3 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 n/a F 0. of $45.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 — F 0.7 38.5 2.1 2.1 Gr 6 avg.2 n/a 28.2 n/a E n/a n/a M 0.5 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.6 35.7 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.1 Tests not written (%) 0.1 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 E n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.1 3.6 2.9 3.7 5.8 2.2 6.6 — Gr 6 avg.2 — Meadowcrest [Public] Brooklin Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 2.9 Overall rank: 2183/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 5.1 3.4 5.0 q Tests not written (%) 15.5 5.8 n/a 3.0 p 2.9 6.6 2.9 2.7 29.9 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 24.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 11.5 2. of $50.1 M 0.3 F 0.2 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.600: -0.0 Writing 2.1 M 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Math 3.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 2.6 — 2.5 2.9 Special needs (%): 17.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2436/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.4 2.6 5.9 3.9 3.5 2.7 — 11.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Math 2.5 2.2 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.6 2.9 2.3 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Writing 2.8 2.4 2.1 7.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.2 23.6 2.8 2.1 Overall rank: 1838/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Tests not written (%) 7.4 2.7 6.8 — Overall rating out of 10 4.8 2. inc.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 5.7 2.8 7.3 — 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.9 2.2 — 7.9 2.0 2.1 n/a n/a M 0.8 — Maple Ridge [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.0 — Math 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.7 — Math 3.5 F 0.1 7.8 Math 3.9 2.4 2.1 — Math M 0.0 3.7 3.6 7.0 n/a Math n/a 2.5 33.5 — 26.9 — Writing 2.3 4. inc.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.9 23.8 2.7 2.9 n/a 2.5 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 41.4 q Writing 3.0 3.9 3.4 Writing 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 9.3 28.9 — 3.9 26.9 2.200: 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 25.8 — 6 5 5.0 — 3.3 1.7 — 2.9 2.4 2.4 9 9.6 7.7 2.6 2.7 2.1 F 0.6 F 0.9 — Math 3.2 3.9 3.1 3.0 — 3.6 — Math 2.3 17.8 2.2 2.0 — F 0.1 19.7 2.9 2.8 2.0 2. of $89.8 2.2 Special needs (%): 16.3 3.9 3.6 — 6.6 — 11. of $69.8 — 2.5 31.6 2.0 0.9 2.3 M 0.0 2.9 2.2 8.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 6.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 Math 2.8 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 12.3 7. level: Reading 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — Math 3. level: Reading 2.0 Math 2.8 2.1 3.9 3.7 2.6 2.3 3.5 F 0.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 25.0 Tests not written (%) 16.3 13.2 Math F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.500: -1.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.5 — Prince Albert [Public] Prince Albert Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.6 2.7 0.6 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 14.8 11.7 6. inc.5 2.9 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.1 p 28.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.4 2.6 2.2 0.6 40.0 p Overall rating out of 10 8.4 4.5 Math 2.9 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.700: 1.4 2.1 3.8 2.0 3.9 2.9 — 2.100: 2.6 F 0.7 2.8 — 2.8 1.2 3.7 0.600: -2.4 — Tests not written (%) 9.100: 0.1 E M 0.9 2.3 2.4 F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.7 2.6 Writing 2.8 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.6 — Math 2.5 8.2 n/a F 0.8 — F 0.2 n/a E n/a Math n/a F 0.8 2.7 2. of $61.9 1.8 2.8 p Our Lady of the Bay [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.6 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.3 n/a Math M 0.4 5.2 2.1 2.8 3.9 2.9 Gr 6 avg.7 — Mother Teresa [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 1.6 2.7 2.4 3.0 2. level: Reading 2.5 3.7 2.9 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 — 19.9 25.8 F 0.9 Math 3.9 2.1 — Writing 2.9 3.5 — Writing 2.9 2.1 — F 0.5 9.6 2.2 2.0 0.8 — .2 F 0.7 5.2 3.8 3.6 0.5 2.4 Overall rank: 667/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.8 — 4.2 30.6 — 3.2 Overall rank: 475/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 q Writing 2.8 2.7 3.8 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 3.7 9.2 q Writing 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.1 1.7 Writing 2.0 3.1 Math M 0.6 2.3 F 0.8 5.3 E — E E F 0.9 Writing 2.4 q Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 27.1 0. level: Reading 2.8 0.6 2.7 2.7 — Writing 2.8 55.3 — 2.9 41.

1 n/a F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.4 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 24.2 — Tests below standard (%) 27.9 4.0 Special needs (%): 32.7 2.3 Math F 0. of $74.3 — 2.1 M 0.5 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.5 M 0. level: Reading 2.2 E — Math M 0.7 2.8 2.5 5.5 n/a 2.6 Math 2.2 Writing 2.8 2.8 — 2.4 31.1 Math M 0. of $86.4 52.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 2.0 — Roland Michener [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 4.7 Math 2.4 2. of $64. level: Reading 2.8 3.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 1.6 F 0.8 2.7 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 — Math 2.3 2.8 2.5 2.4 Writing 2.1 F 0.7 2.6 — 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 — 2.5 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.3 Overall rank: 2183/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.7 3.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.7 29.8 2.7 — 2.6 2.4 2.7 — Writing 2.2 — Sir Samuel Steele [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 0.6 2.3 Math 2.6 — 2 3.6 2.6 6.3 n/a n/a E n/a F 0.4 2.8 0. level: Reading 2.2 — 25.4 2.3 F 0.1 n/a n/a F 0.8 — 2.3 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2. inc.9 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.3 Writing 2.5 2.0 2.9 3.3 40.2 M 0.5 0.6 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Special needs (%): 25. of $79.1 F 0.1 F 0.6 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 60.8 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Math 2.4 Tests not written (%) 2.2 2.7 n/a 3.4 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 27.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 6.7 6.5 30.7 5. of $84.6 6.7 2.3 2.9 Math 2.7 19.5 23.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3. inc.8 2.0 3.8 Overall rating out of 10 0 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 30.0 — 2.4 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 2.9 0.3 59.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 Math 2.2 n/a 1.8 2.6 F 0.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 14.6 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.1 26.6 2.5 2.1 2. inc. level: Reading 3.9 Tests not written (%) 2.6 Writing 2.4 2.8 2.8 n/a Queen Elizabeth [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 2.5 n/a 2.7 p Sherwood [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 8.3 7 6.6 2.000: -0.7 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Tests below standard (%) 35.300: -0.2 1.0 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 100 Special needs (%): 19.0 3.0 2.2 — 2.2 F 0.9 20.1 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 77.5 Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 2.8 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 0. of $94.6 6.8 2.2 6.4 27.8 Overall rating out of 10 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.7 — 8.2 4.9 — 2.2 Writing 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 52. of $73.5 — Sir William Stephenson [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.0 2.2 — 5.2 F 0.0 0.5 22.5 2.7 2.7 2.2 — 2.1 2.7 2.1 M 0. inc.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.9 — 2.5 — 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2612/2742 2329/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 16.7 2.0 2.9 2.7 35.1 2.7 — Writing 2.9 2.2 n/a E n/a F 0.8 2.8 3.6 — 2.7 2.2 n/a 27.7 2.4 — 10.1 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Overall rank: 1948/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 0.8 2.0 Writing 2.500: -1.7 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.0 2.1 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math M 0.0 2.6 3.5 2.1 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Math 2.5 Writing 2.5 2.7 2. of $58.2 1.6 2.6 Tests not written (%) 3.4 3.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 2.2 Math F 0.9 n/a 2.7 — Writing 2.6 2.8 2.5 Special needs (%): 26.6 Math 2.8 Math 2.8 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 3.300: 1.9 2.9 2.7 2.6 38.2 54.0 7. of $93.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.8 5.5 6.5 2.3 — 2.3 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 E E n/a 47.4 2.5 2. inc.2 Tests below standard (%) 32.5 2.2 E — 22.9 — 2.8 Gr 6 avg.3 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 2.700: 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 4.9 3.0 2.7 2.3 M 0.8 Math 2.8 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 2.6 2.8 2.2 F 0.8 3.6 — 2.6 3.4 — F 0.3 — 17.9 25.700: -0.6 — 2.0 — n/a F 0.7 — 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.3 Gr 6 avg.3 n/a n/a E E F 0.5 — Math 2.1 F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 10.5 44.9 11.4 F 0.5 F 0.9 13. level: Reading 2.6 Tests not written (%) 6.200: -1.4 q Writing 2.1 — Southwood Park [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.1 27.9 2.4 n/a 2.9 2.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 28.5 3.6 2.3 33.8 8.5 F 0.0 47.0 35.1 7.7 2.0 n/a 5.8 2.1 Writing 2.5 — F 0.1 F 0.5 Writing 2.9 — 2. of $34.4 3.7 14.0 — Math 3. level: Reading 2.5 n/a S A Cawker [Public] Port Perry ESL (%): 0.4 F 0.1 n/a 60.8 3.8 27.8 2.9 — Writing 2.7 — Math 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.8 3. level: Reading 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 E — 21.1 F 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 3.3 F 0.3 — E M 0. of $67.4 E F 0.6 2.8 2.3 n/a 40.4 39.4 2.2 5.2 — F 0.7 2.1 M 0.5 — 4.8 2.2 — 6.0 2.8 3.6 — 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.2 3.1 7 7.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 14.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.2 Math 2.7 n/a 2.3 2.5 2.3 — Sir Albert Love [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.3 — Math E F 0.6 2.2 F 0.4 2.5 2.3 2. level: Reading 1. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 2.7 Gr 6 avg.900: -1.9 Tests not written (%) 3.2 — F 0.8 — Math 3.3 — 5.9 2.4 2.1 16.9 2.6 2.1 — 4.4 2.2 F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 — 2.4 n/a 2. level: Reading 2.9 Math 1.6 — 9. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.7 Writing 2.3 Writing 2.0 1.7 — Math 3.5 2.4 22.500: 0.9 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 4.9 n/a 6.2 — 6.9 2.3 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 3.6 n/a 3.4 — 2.2 66.5 6.3 2.7 2.2 2.1 M 0.2 5.8 Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 50.8 4.8 2.2 1.7 2.5 2.8 — Math 3.4 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 39.7 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 6.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 — 2.0 — F 0.3 2.9 Tests not written (%) 11.8 59.0 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Writing 2.5 3. of $87.7 — 3.7 2.2 40.6 — 28. level: Reading 2.5 Tests not written (%) 15.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — 2.2 15.7 2.4 8.8 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.3 37.5 2.7 2.2 Tests not written (%) 7. inc.200: 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.2 3.2 E — 35. level: Reading 2.7 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.2 2.2 F 0.5 2.4 — 2.8 — 2.5 6.4 2.7 — F 0.9 p Math 2.5 2.3 2.7 2.3 — 7.4 2.0 2.6 2.6 5.3 2.4 q F 0.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.6 Math 2.0 9.6 — 10.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 42.6 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 — Writing 2.4 Writing 1.6 — Tests not written (%) 9.0 37.2 F 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.5 p 6.8 2.1 17.3 M 0.7 Writing 2.0 2.8 2.4 2.4 Math 2.1 M 0.1 F 0.7 — 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 69 Special needs (%): 20.6 2.7 Writing 2.3 7. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.6 5.8 1.1 2.6 2.9 2.2 44.2 2.9 2.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.7 32.8 2.0 2.1 — Ritson [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.3 2.8 2.700: 1.7 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.1 F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.7 2.2 — n/a F 0.8 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 27.2 6.7 — 2.4 2.2 2.1 F 0.2 — .7 57.5 Gr 6 avg.7 45.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 37. inc.4 2.5 0.0 2.900: 0.9 2.8 5 4.0 2.2 — F 0.7 Writing 2.0 2. of $79.6 Special needs (%): 15.300: -2.2 F 0.6 2. of $74.9 2. inc.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 16.9 17.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 9.5 5.1 — F 0.8 — 2.3 2.4 n/a F 0.2 — 2.0 — Writing 3.1 4.3 M 0.2 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 1.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 0.1 n/a n/a Math M 0. inc.1 M 0.1 Math M 0.2 7.4 48.6 Math 2.9 2.300: -0.9 2.3 25.1 F 0.6 n/a 2.9 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2.500: -1.5 — 19.8 2.1 2.6 26.8 — F 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 — 2.8 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — 5.4 Math 2.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 43.4 F 0.0 1. level: Reading 2.2 n/a 32.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 25.5 — Sir John A Macdonald [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 1.5 9.8 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 3.4 2.6 n/a 4. inc.4 2.6 n/a 2.7 2.3 F 0.5 6.8 — R A Sennett [Public] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 11.1 — Gr 6 avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 36.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 36. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 Overall rank: 360/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Scott Central [Public] Sandford ESL (%): 0.0 2.6 2.8 2.3 2.3 E n/a M 0.2 F 0.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 7.6 — 2.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.0 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.7 — 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.3 Tests not written (%) 11.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 22.2 3 3.8 q 3.7 2.6 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2436/2742 2255/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 M 0.4 Tests below standard (%) 30.5 5.4 3.7 3. inc.9 — 2.2 n/a 62.8 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 0.9 — R H Cornish [Public] Port Perry ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2. inc. inc.2 Math 2.8 2.3 — 1.1 F 0.9 2.1 F 0.8 2.8 — F 0.7 — Rosebank Road [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.4 23.1 E F 0. of $46.7 — Tests not written (%) 5.6 — 2.5 F 0.8 0.9 5.8 2.9 — Writing 2. inc.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 n/a 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.8 2.8 3.0 — 7.8 2.7 2.1 3.8 Math 2.26 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Quaker Village [Public] Uxbridge ESL (%): 0.7 Math 2.2 n/a n/a E M 0.0 3.9 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.1 5.1 M 0.6 2.2 E M 0.6 — 2.

0 0.0 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 35.3 F 0. inc.2 n/a M 0.1 — 2.7 2.9 2.3 10.0 — 3. level: Reading 2.4 — 25.5 6.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6 7.8 p Tests not written (%) 1.8 2.6 — 2. level: Reading 3.3 2.7 2.9 2. of $92.5 23.6 3.7 p St Bernadette [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 1.5 q Writing 2.8 2.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.8 2.6 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.6 2.1 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 31.3 — Math E F 0.6 2.8 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 3.400: 0.7 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 3.7 3.5 Math 2. of $83.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.2 5.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 3.5 2.5 F 0.6 3.9 4.7 28.7 2.2 1.0 2.5 7.9 2. inc. level: Reading n/a 2.8 — Writing 2.1 F 0.5 7. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 — 2. level: Reading 2.5 q 5 6.0 1.9 — Math 2.2 Math 2.8 2.7 Gr 6 avg.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 n/a 41.8 Writing 2.0 n/a St Hedwig [Catholic] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 3.5 2.0 — 6.8 9.6 2.4 2.800: 1.0 1.8 2.7 Overall rank: 396/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 Math 2.1 F 0.1 F 0.6 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.1 — F 0.9 2.9 — 2.3 Math 2.1 3.9 2.6 Tests not written (%) 1.6 3.7 E E n/a M 0.6 3.2 q 33.2 3. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.7 2.3 M 0.7 2.4 q Math M 0.7 — Writing 2.3 15.5 6.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.1 2.6 Overall rank: 787/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 7.0 2.5 38.8 2.8 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.6 2.2 8.8 2.0 — 2.7 — 2.0 2.8 6.9 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.3 27.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.9 6.5 2.0 Gr 6 avg.3 — Tests not written (%) 5.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 22.4 18.0 — 6 7.9 2.9 2.7 — M 0.7 — 3.0 Overall rank: 58/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 5.4 3.5 7.3 — St John Bosco [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.7 2.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 37.4 24.0 — Writing 2.6 2.9 30.9 8.0 Tests not written (%) 4.0 Writing 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 5.9 2.7 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.3 — 3.0 4.3 p St John the Evangelist [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 2.1 — 34.6 n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 2.1 — 2.1 — F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 49.6 9.3 F 0.9 6.2 3.1 p M 0.5 2.2 F 0.1 F 0.8 Writing 2.1 F 0.1 3.9 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.8 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.4 36.1 Math F 0.1 n/a F 0.1 Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.4 Overall rank: 235/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.9 2.4 3.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 39.0 — 5.3 2.7 25.7 2.7 Writing 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 0.9 2.5 2.8 p 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Math 2.4 — 28.8 2.7 3. of $75.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 — St Bridget [Catholic] Brooklin Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 0.0 3.0 — Math 2.2 Special needs (%): 16.4 — 4.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 — Math 2.5 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 20. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.3 M 0.7 3.9 — Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.2 2.8 2.9 3.2 F 0.9 3.7 2.100: 3.4 3. inc.1 — Tests below standard (%) 33.3 4.2 Overall rank: 1215/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 36.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 14. level: Reading 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 3.0 3. level: Reading n/a 2.7 — 2.1 F 0. of $99.0 2.8 3.8 3.8 2.9 3.5 28.8 2.3 29.2 E E M 0.8 — St Elizabeth Seton [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 71 ESL (%): 1.7 — Writing 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.3 p 1.0 1.8 3.6 2.3 20.3 7.7 Math 2.7 2.8 2.1 — 5.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 6.6 Math 2.9 2.5 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 32.3 F 0.7 Writing 2.8 5.1 Writing 2.6 23.9 2.5 — M 0.6 2.6 — St James [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 0.9 2.8 2.8 2.2 3.8 29.2 E F 0.0 — F 0.6 2.8 2.9 2.1 — 3.7 3.9 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 2.7 24. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 3. of $88.3 F 0.3 3.3 9.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — 3.0 0.0 3.8 2.3 3.8 — Math 2.5 2. inc.8 2. inc.9 2.200: 0.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.8 7.8 2.2 — E M 0.6 7.7 2.7 2.3 — 1.5 6.9 2.9 2.7 Special needs (%): 22.8 — St Isaac Jogues [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 2.2 Gr 6 avg.5 2.7 p Tests not written (%) 6.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 15.5 2. level: Reading 2. of $93.7 — 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.8 1. level: Reading 2.2 n/a 20.800: 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.9 2.4 3.0 — Math 2.7 2.6 3.7 — F 0.0 2.1 n/a Math M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.7 — 2.2 n/a M 0.7 — St Joseph [Catholic] Uxbridge ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 — 2.7 19.900: -0.7 — 3.6 2.8 2.8 2.3 14.4 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 4.2 F 0.6 2.6 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Math 3.1 p Math M 0.4 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 34.6 2.6 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 E F 0. inc.3 8.7 2.8 2.7 9.8 6.8 2.8 2.4 3. inc.8 3.7 Special needs (%): 22.9 3.6 2.1 F 0.5 34.8 2.9 3. of $100.9 2.0 — 2.9 — 2.7 2.0 2. inc.3 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 — Math 2.7 2.8 24. of $47.4 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 21. level: Reading 2.7 3.6 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 7.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 6.2 F 0.7 2.7 — Math 2.0 p 2.2 M 0.0 — 2.7 7.8 2.7 2.1 F 0. of $67.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 52.0 — Math 2.6 6 6.6 5 5.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8. inc.1 F 0.4 1.2 5.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 1.4 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 n/a n/a n/a 41.3 E M 0.3 M 0.7 33.7 2.9 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.0 — Math 2.0 — 2.4 — M 0.1 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 2.2 Writing 2.2 1.2 25.9 3.9 6.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 4.0 — Writing 2.4 n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.0 1.8 3.9 2.8 2.7 6.5 1.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 Writing 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 — 2.9 Writing 2.4 28.0 3.8 — Writing 2.8 — Math 2.1 3.600: -0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 0.600: 0.1 M 0.3 — .5 9.2 M 0.9 2.1 13.4 E F 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 F 0.3 n/a F 0.9 — Writing 2.6 — 6.8 2.7 2.0 30.6 Overall rating out of 10 5. of $99.0 24.5 2.6 3.8 2.6 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 41.6 Math 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 8.9 3.6 7. of $92.7 24.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.8 2.5 Overall rank: 964/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.5 Writing 2.1 Math M 0.5 Special needs (%): 14.8 2.8 — Math 2.9 35.2 3.5 2.0 2.6 2.5 — F 0.5 2.2 Overall rank: 1838/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 7.9 2.1 F 0.4 F 0.0 17.4 0.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 11.7 17.7 q Overall rating out of 10 6 6.9 Math 2.8 16.6 n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.7 2.6 2. inc.6 2.5 18.7 2.7 — 2.9 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.2 39.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — 2.4 2.7 Math 2.9 2.2 2.900: 0.8 2.4 2.2 — Writing 2.9 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.3 p St Christopher [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.9 3.1 E M 0.3 35.8 — Writing 2.9 3.1 2.4 2.8 Tests not written (%) 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.3 F 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 3.700: 1.200: 2.3 0.3 28.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 9.2 10.6 2.8 2.1 3.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Writing 3.6 3.2 6.7 Tests not written (%) 2.5 2.6 — 2.9 2.900: 0.7 2.7 Writing 2. of $77.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 10.1 F 0.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 — 2.8 2.7 2.700: -0.4 Special needs (%): 2.5 2.0 3.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 11.6 2.0 3.2 2.2 F 0.1 — 1.8 3.7 — Gr 6 avg.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 5.6 — Tests not written (%) 4.9 Math 2.3 n/a St Joseph [Catholic] Oshawa ESL (%): 1.3 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.4 6.8 21.2 F 0.7 36.5 F 0.5 4.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.8 2.9 Tests not written (%) 2.1 F 0.9 2.1 3.8 3. level: Reading 2.8 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.5 2.4 — St Bernard [Catholic] Whitby ESL (%): 0.9 3.500: 0.2 n/a F 0.7 3.8 3.0 2.8 p 2.8 2.6 0.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 2.2 7.9 1.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.7 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.1 M 0.7 2.1 — 7.1 — Writing 2.7 2.2 32.8 2.5 6.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.0 4.5 23.4 2. of $56.2 Tests below standard (%) 41. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.1 Math 3.1 3.5 2.7 28.6 23.1 — St Francis de Sales [Catholic] Ajax Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 3.9 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 36.6 2.7 2.1 — 2.8 6. of $84.1 F 0.7 2.3 6.6 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 27 St Anthony Daniel [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 4.1 3.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 3.8 19. inc.4 2.9 p 2.2 M 0.8 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 16.3 Gr 6 avg.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.7 Math 2.6 2.7 2.8 — 2.4 7.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.8 2. inc.5 F 0.1 M 0.9 2.8 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.5 3.1 F 0.9 p 2.5 2.3 18.5 2.7 — 2.9 — F 0.5 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 11.4 2.4 2.0 2.8 — St Catherine of Siena [Catholic] Ajax Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 3.1 8.000: 0.0 3.3 7.6 2.9 2.6 — 2.8 2.6 2.5 8.0 — Tests not written (%) 8.7 2.7 2. of $99.6 2.5 5.2 F 0.5 2.

5 Writing 2.7 Math 2.8 — St Marguerite d’Youville [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 0.1 3.7 2.7 5.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 F 0.0 0.0 — 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.7 — 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.8 2.3 2.9 — 2.8 p Math 2.9 3.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $68.1 F 0.2 F 0.0 Math 3.9 2.6 3.7 4.3 38.5 — 1.3 p 6.1 2.800: -0.1 29.8 — Math 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.0 3.6 2.5 2.1 n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 29.6 2.7 — 2.6 — 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.7 Tests not written (%) 2. level: Reading 2.5 33.7 — 2.8 Math 2.9 2.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.8 2.7 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 19.5 2.800: 1.7 2.7 2.0 Math 3.8 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 F 0.6 n/a Math n/a 2.7 3.8 2.7 2.5 3.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Math 2.4 7. level: Reading 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 4 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 13.2 F 0.9 8.5 24.9 3.8 2.3 F 0.5 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Gr 6 avg.4 3. of $76.5 F 0.8 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.1 26.0 2.0 43.5 — 2.9 6.1 — Math E F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 32.8 — 7.5 0.5 Math 2.4 n/a n/a F 0.2 10.8 2.0 3.0 4.7 Math 2. of $92.6 Writing 2.8 2.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.2 F 0.7 2.000: -2.9 2.7 — 2.0 30.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.7 — Writing 2.2 M 0.7 2.9 3.1 F 0.0 5. of $92.7 2.3 11.1 3.1 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.2 6.5 — 2.7 42.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 3.7 2. inc.2 27.2 F 0.7 — 2.1 — St Wilfrid [Catholic] Pickering ESL (%): 2.3 2.2 6.7 3.7 — St Patrick [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 1.7 7.3 q Sunderland [Public] Sunderland ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 5.8 7.7 M 0.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.8 — Writing 2.3 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 34.7 2. inc.8 2.6 2.7 2.6 q 3.7 2.7 2.1 — 5.6 7.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — Math 2.8 — Writing 3.6 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 71 Special needs (%): 18.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 22.4 25.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 — Writing 2.5 — 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 Writing 2.8 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.1 0. of $82.1 F 0.6 2.3 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 8.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 F 0.28 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Jude [Catholic] Ajax ESL (%): 0.0 — Math 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 30.7 2.8 3. of $100. of $71.9 2.9 0.700: 0.8 27. level: Reading 2.9 — 3. inc.4 2.0 2.9 2.8 — Math 2.3 F 0. inc.7 3.6 6.4 6.2 E F 0.9 3.0 2.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.2 E p Tests below standard (%) 22.2 3.9 n/a Math n/a 2.0 Special needs (%): 23. inc.5 2.5 Math 2.1 n/a F 0.3 M 0.000: -1. inc.6 3.2 p F 0.6 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 6.3 2.0 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.000: -1.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.8 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 12.8 2.9 Tests not written (%) 2.7 2.5 2.3 25.1 2.0 — 4.7 2.5 p St Leo [Catholic] Brooklin ESL (%): 0.6 — 2. level: Reading 3.2 n/a F 0.2 — 2.0 2.3 F 0.8 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 27.2 42.9 2.2 E — Math F 0.8 7.0 — F 0.8 2.3 23.8 — Stephen G Saywell [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 0.7 2.3 Gr 6 avg.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.7 Writing 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 1.4 2.8 2.6 2.1 n/a n/a M 0.2 M 0.7 2.9 1.9 28.5 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 — Writing 2.9 2. inc.9 2.0 1.8 7.5 E M 0.7 Math 2.9 3.9 Writing 3.9 2.0 2.3 F 0.6 q 2.4 M 0.4 6.7 p 2.7 2.3 F 0.8 2.900: 1.4 F 0.7 2.6 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 17. inc. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.8 — Math 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 M 0.7 2.8 2.2 F 0.6 2.0 34.7 — Writing 2.0 Overall rank: 623/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a 2.0 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — 2.8 2.6 2.5 E n/a 39. level: Reading 2.0 9.5 10.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a 43.2 E M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 36.5 — 34.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 18.8 — 2.5 4.7 2.7 1.7 — Writing 2.8 2.8 n/a St Luke the Evangelist [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 78 ESL (%): 1.2 18.9 p Math 2.9 21.7 2.5 Writing 2.8 2.0 2.6 Tests not written (%) 2.3 Overall rank: 147/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 Math 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.0 3.0 Special needs (%): 10.9 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 — Math 3.9 3.8 2.3 2.5 M 0.100: 2.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 35.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 35.4 21.8 2.0 2.4 1.8 2.8 3.1 Writing 2.4 n/a Writing n/a 2.2 p 2. inc.1 — 32.9 Writing 2.8 3.1 24.4 5.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3. level: Reading 2.0 Writing 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 1.1 Overall rank: 1556/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.0 2. inc.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 16.5 4.9 3.6 — 2.0 2.5 23.9 2.4 2.0 3.3 F 0.1 — Writing 2.1 — 2.9 Special needs (%): 11. inc.7 — 2.7 2.0 2.2 Overall rank: 1285/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.1 Math M 0.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 F 0.9 3.2 n/a F 0. of $92.8 3.1 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Writing 2. of $73.1 Overall rank: 964/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2. of $96.9 2.7 2.8 6.9 5. level: Reading 2.2 29.4 F 0.5 7.7 — 2.5 2.8 3.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.4 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.8 1.8 — 2.3 n/a F 0.7 — 2.5 2.4 9.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — F 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.9 0.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 32.4 F 0.7 2. of $113.1 F 0.6 5.5 24.0 — Math 3.8 Overall rank: 902/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.8 2.5 2.3 29.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc. level: Reading n/a 2.7 — 2.7 2.4 F 0.6 2.5 — M 0.9 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.4 6.3 2.4 4.6 Math 2.6 — 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 q 2.1 F 0.0 1.0 32.9 — Writing 2.0 25.5 Tests not written (%) 6.8 3.5 8.8 21.2 F 0.2 M 0.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 2.7 2.5 2.1 n/a n/a E F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 — 2.0 2.5 Math 2.4 Gr 6 avg.1 St Marguerite Bourgeoys [Catholic] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 2.6 7.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.3 q 20.9 — Math 2.1 7. level: Reading 2.0 3.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 19.2 n/a E M 0. of $68.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 13.9 2.8 2.6 7.3 M 0.1 Math F 0.1 40.7 3.7 Gr 6 avg.7 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 22.3 7 4.4 6.7 Writing 2.200: 0.1 F 0.4 n/a Math M 0.6 — 2.3 — 5.2 Tests below standard (%) 13.7 2.4 2.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.8 5.3 5.7 Gr 6 avg.6 3.9 2.7 34.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 n/a F 0.1 M 0.6 11.7 2.8 2.9 5.7 3.7 5.0 Special needs (%): 12.6 Writing 2.0 — 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Gr 6 avg.0 p 2.7 2.7 Writing 2.3 Overall rank: 1156/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 M 0.0 21.6 2.7 2.9 — F 0.0 Special needs (%): 23. of $100.0 — 5.2 M 0.6 — M 0.1 n/a F 0.2 31.7 2.6 2.7 33.7 — 2.2 — 2.4 2.0 4.8 2.5 3.8 3.1 E F 0.4 2.0 2.5 — Math F 0.2 M 0.7 2.0 3.4 23.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.2 — St Theresa [Catholic] Whitby ESL (%): 0.6 2.0 3.9 26.1 F 0.1 6.7 2.4 — E M 0.6 6.6 Math 2.4 — Math M 0. level: Reading 2.4 Tests not written (%) 2.1 1.8 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.4 7. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 2.0 2.2 — 3.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.8 32. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.9 6.6 2.9 3.8 E n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.8 — 3.1 3.7 — Writing 2.8 q 2.7 — 2.3 0.9 2.9 25.3 — St Matthew the Evangelist [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 54 ESL (%): 1.400: -0.0 p Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 — 3.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.1 19.7 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.7 20.2 n/a 27.3 F 0.5 q 2.9 2.0 3.8 2.200: 0.6 2.4 1.3 Special needs (%): 7.0 — Writing 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 0.8 2.9 2.0 15.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 3.1 — M 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.5 2.7 43.9 2.1 F 0.4 — St Paul [Catholic] Whitby ESL (%): 0. of $63.7 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 Writing 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.1 3.8 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.6 Math 2.5 — 5.9 Writing 2.7 3.9 Writing 2.3 Tests not written (%) 2.1 6.8 — 2.6 2.5 2.2 M 0.2 Math M 0. inc.3 E F 0.8 0.7 2.8 p 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 5.8 — Math 2.4 26.0 0.5 2.7 2.8 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 3.8 3. inc.7 2.4 Writing 2.0 — 10.9 6.0 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 5.1 4.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 45.3 25.2 9 6 6.6 28.300: -0.5 7.7 q .4 4.1 3.4 1.1 2.6 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 2.7 6.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 — 5.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 1.7 2.6 — 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 7.2 F 0.3 E F 0.1 0.3 n/a 14.8 2.7 p St Mark the Evangelist [Catholic] Whitby Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.6 1.1 M 0.7 3.8 2.7 — Math 2.0 2.3 7 6.7 2.2 2.0 3.7 2.0 2.0 1.0 Special needs (%): 22.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.7 — St Monica [Catholic] Pickering ESL (%): 0. inc.600: 0.0 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — n/a M 0.5 — F 0. of $87.1 — Overall rating out of 10 4.8 — F 0.3 — St Thomas Aquinas [Catholic] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.5 7 5.0 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.7 2.8 6.800: 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.7 2.9 2.0 3.5 Math 2.8 2.0 3.9 2.0 0.6 2.9 3.8 2.700: -1.7 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.0 2.3 2.9 3.7 2.2 2.0 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.9 Math 2.6 2.7 2.4 E F 0.9 2.5 2.4 n/a n/a 35.1 M 0.8 2.9 Tests not written (%) 6.5 2.4 n/a Math F 0.2 33.6 3.5 36.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — 3.3 2.0 7. level: Reading 2.5 2.

6 Math 3.9 Gr 6 avg.8 4.3 24.8 2.0 26.6 Writing 2.0 Writing 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 Math M 0.4 2.8 2.3 F 0. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.5 2.2 41.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.9 2.0 0.4 2.3 2.6 — 2.9 2.4 — 2.8 3.5 7.3 4.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 13.6 6.3 2. level: Reading 3.3 — Writing 2.1 3.3 2.1 2.0 — 5.7 — Math 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.8 Tests not written (%) 1.1 n/a 2.4 13.7 5. of $33.3 — F 0.4 2.5 2.9 — Thorah Central [Public] Beaverton Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.1 M 0.0 4.3 — Valley Farm [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.2 6.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 14.5 Writing 2.2 E M 0.9 2.4 — M 0.0 0.2 2.700: 0.9 n/a M 0.9 — Math 3.6 3.4 — 2.0 3.3 3.000: 1.1 F 0.6 2.6 — 2.0 Writing 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — Math 2.7 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.3 n/a n/a F 0.0 p 2.1 1.9 3. level: Reading 2.4 8.9 6.9 2.3 E F 0.0 0.9 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 2.0 2.4 30.0 0. inc. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 E E E — F 0.5 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.1 2.6 — 29.8 6.1 F 0.8 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 14.6 2.6 Writing 2.4 2.6 23.7 Math 2.6 2.8 2.4 — F 0.8 6.8 2.9 2.5 — F 0.5 31.1 3.5 2.7 2.0 6.0 — 5.4 1.3 2.5 Math 2.5 2.8 2.4 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 24.2 — 23.0 29.2 n/a 3.4 Math F 0.8 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 72 Special needs (%): 15. inc.5 23.6 q F 0.1 F 0.300: 1.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 2.4 1.2 0.0 Math 2.7 2.6 — 2.9 — 2.1 Math 3.5 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 15.5 3.6 2.0 — 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.5 Math 2.5 Math 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 45.2 M 0.3 F 0.9 1.6 — 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.4 37.9 n/a 2.6 Math 2.2 — 21.5 2.8 — Math 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 — 31.7 Writing 2.9 2. inc.7 2.7 2.3 n/a 60.0 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 52. inc.3 1.6 2.7 q n/a F 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 3.8 q 2.5 — 4. level: Reading 2.2 27.5 — Gr 6 avg.7 67.1 3.1 F 0.6 — 7.0 3.0 Tests not written (%) 11. of $67.6 2.9 2.6 Gr 6 avg.9 12.5 Math 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.4 33.8 3.0 2.9 2.1 3.5 7.8 2.6 — Math 2.8 2.3 F 0.1 — Terry Fox [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 5.6 28.2 6.5 2.4 2.5 2.0 2.3 1.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Writing 2.8 n/a Math n/a 3.0 — 2.3 28.9 p Gr 6 avg.1 M 0.1 — 34.5 Math 2.0 0.3 21.7 2.9 — 3.3 0.1 q 2.2 0.4 2.5 2.6 — F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 — 3.2 M 0.1 15.9 — 2.5 — 7.1 n/a E n/a n/a 42.3 — 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.0 3.6 2.5 2.8 2.0 2.4 2.3 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.4 7.0 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 29.8 7.5 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.3 F 0.5 3.4 6.8 3.6 Math 2.3 F 0.7 — 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.3 2. of $55.9 Tests not written (%) 13.2 4.5 2.0 q Gr 6 avg.7 2.2 — Waverly [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.7 — 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 2.4 2.500: 2.3 Tests not written (%) 9.7 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.8 49.8 2.8 2.8 31.6 — 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 51.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 2.300: 0.4 57.3 6.0 2.3 0.1 F 0.0 n/a 8 5.8 — 2.2 F 0.5 Writing 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2.8 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.1 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 19.5 F 0.1 F 0.9 2.3 2.0 0.9 2.4 2.7 Writing 2.8 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.300: -2.3 n/a E n/a n/a F 0.9 2.1 6.4 2.8 2.4 7.9 2.8 Writing 2.7 33.8 2.5 2.9 2.7 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.800: 0.7 2.4 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.1 Math M 0. inc.5 — 12.5 2.3 — 28.900: -1.1 E F 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 10 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 20. of $61.8 p 2.3 Math 2.2 22.5 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0. level: Reading 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 2.5 p Winchester [Public] Brooklin ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 Writing 2.7 2.2 F 0.7 22.8 3.6 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 — Writing 3.9 3.0 0. level: Reading 2.5 2.9 2.6 — 2.8 Tests not written (%) 3.5 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.9 — 2.4 n/a 17. inc.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 — .8 6.7 2.8 — Vaughan Willard [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 2. level: Reading 2.4 Special needs (%): 21.2 E — F 0. of $63. of $56. inc.1 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. inc.4 2.1 2.8 2. inc.2 2.3 F 0.8 2.300: 0.3 F 0.8 — 3.3 2.2 — 14.7 2.5 n/a F 0.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 22.6 Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.3 5.9 6.8 2. inc.8 Math 3.7 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.1 Tests not written (%) 8.4 8.2 Tests below standard (%) 32.6 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 28.1 F 0.6 — 2.2 Writing 2.0 68.1 Tests below standard (%) 40.0 2.8 2.4 — 7.2 — M 0.5 7.5 51.7 2.9 2.5 3. level: Reading n/a 2.0 — F 0.8 3.5 2.8 — F 0.5 — 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 43.4 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.8 — F 0.1 2.1 E M 0.7 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.9 2.6 Math 2.8 — 2.2 4 4 5.4 M 0.9 2.7 2.0 2.4 — 6.3 37.9 3.8 27.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 n/a Valley View [Public] Greenwood Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.3 2.5 3.3 6.5 Overall rank: 235/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 7.3 F 0. of $86.6 q 21.2 F 0.0 1.6 — 2.9 51.7 6.6 — 2.8 — 2.4 Writing 2.1 M 0.8 6.6 2.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.6 — Writing 2.8 2.6 — Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2. of $94.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — 6.1 Math M 0.4 2.0 — Westcreek [Public] Pickering ESL (%): 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 Writing 2.7 2.5 — Village Union [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.7 2.7 2.1 — 2.1 M 0.6 2.0 Overall rank: 212/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.9 1.6 2.1 29.1 F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 M 0.3 22.2 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 2.1 Tests not written (%) 7.2 n/a Math E E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.2 2.9 2.7 — Vincent Massey [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 0.5 Math 2. of $113.0 48.2 Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 2.9 3.7 57. of $77.0 2.6 2.7 2.1 3.9 — 2.1 p 1.3 2.8 Gr 6 avg.4 2.5 — F 0.8 Tests not written (%) 18.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Westney Heights [Public] Ajax ESL (%): 0.7 2.3 2.9 p 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 16.3 F 0.9 6.4 2.7 Gr 6 avg.2 M 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 0.2 1.4 2.8 5.9 0.5 2.6 2.0 0.6 2.6 2.0 0.6 2.6 2.8 2.7 65.2 M 0.9 — 3.7 3.2 15.8 2.4 F 0.4 5.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 n/a 3.7 2.9 p 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 8. level: Reading 3.5 2.8 2.0 p 2.8 34.500: -3.4 2.7 2.5 Writing 3.0 Special needs (%): 9.600: -0.8 2.8 6 6. inc. level: Reading 2.8 2. of $93.7 7.3 M 0.1 F 0.4 p 6.0 0. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.2 M 0.8 Math 3.9 2.5 2.7 — 2.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 — Tests below standard (%) 19.4 — 2. level: Reading 3.8 2.7 2.5 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 3.2 4.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 F 0.1 0.4 n/a West Lynde [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 2.9 2.9 — 4.7 55.8 2.2 F 0.0 Overall rank: 2436/2742 2270/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.2 M 0.1 25.6 n/a M 0.0 — 2.6 7.5 — 2.0 2.6 27.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 F 0.4 2. level: Reading 2.300: 0.4 M 0.4 33.1 — 40.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 53.1 M 0.8 2.9 0.8 8.3 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.3 — 1.4 Writing 3.7 Writing 2.4 — Williamsburg [Public] Whitby ESL (%): 2.9 p 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 4. level: Reading 2.7 2.2 2.4 17.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 29 Sunset Heights [Public] Oshawa ESL (%): 2.8 — 2.3 E F 0.700: 1. of $67.1 E — Math F 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2692/2742 2295/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 18.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 M 0. inc.0 0.9 Math 2.9 2.8 2.8 Math 3.1 3.9 n/a 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.6 12.4 — 39.2 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 10.7 Writing 2.3 7.7 Gr 6 avg.4 q 2. inc.6 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.0 2.0 2.0 0.800: 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 29.0 2.9 3.8 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.1 22.8 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 75 Special needs (%): 12.8 2.2 Gr 6 avg.9 — 2.9 3.3 — F 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.4 M 0.7 2.7 22.2 F 0.0 Gr 6 avg.9 n/a 2.7 Math 2.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.3 20.5 n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 3.9 2.9 2.1 F 0.8 — 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 — William Dunbar [Public] Pickering Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 0.4 — F 0.1 Tests not written (%) 11.8 2.9 — 2.2 F 0.6 — 2.3 8.8 — Writing 2.6 — 5.2 Math F 0.1 34.5 2.2 2.0 p 5.9 3.2 5 6. inc.5 — F 0.6 2.6 2.0 3.9 2. of $73.6 2.9 2.9 2.4 F 0.2 6.4 2.2 F 0.7 2.7 2.5 2.1 F 0.3 2.2 3.8 2.9 p 2.4 30.3 F 0.0 Tests not written (%) 4. level: Reading 3.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7. of $106.9 — F 0.7 2.7 2. of $69.2 — 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 21.0 Special needs (%): 11.8 7.300: -2.0 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.5 F 0.5 — 12.9 2.0 3.8 2.7 Math 2.

0 — 6.9 1. level: Reading 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 4. level: Reading 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math 2.9 2.3 q F 0.9 Writing 2.2 3.9 3.7 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2.3 0.8 2.8 p 2.2 M 0.9 28.0 — 2.7 — Math 2.6 2. inc.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — 1.6 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 24. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.2 — E M 0.8 — Math 2.2 n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — Math 3.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.9 2.0 3.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 22.4 4.8 2.9 — Writing 2.3 F 0.1 2.7 Writing 2.8 3.8 3.5 2.6 — 6.7 Writing 2.9 2.4 6. of $73.8 2.4 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 — Math 3.3 6.0 2.9 Writing 2.3 37.7 2.6 2.000: 1.6 2.600: 1.2 — Math F 0.3 3.7 2.3 26.5 0.1 2.2 1.8 q 3.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 p 2.9 7.7 Special needs (%): 10.8 Math 3.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 6.9 2.8 2.7 2.2 27.5 F 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 29.0 32.1 2.8 — 3.9 p Writing 2.2 7.5 0.8 2.8 2.8 2.30 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Woodcrest [Public] Oshawa Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.7 2.4 E — M 0.1 2.1 — 25.7 29.1 F 0.2 M 0.4 5.8 2.4 E F 0.3 E F 0.4 6.9 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 2.9 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 6.6 2.4 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Special needs (%): 5.6 13.2 n/a F 0.9 5.0 2.1 — F 0.6 2.9 2.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.4 q Math M 0.9 Gr 6 avg.0 26.3 Math M 0.3 n/a n/a F 0.9 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Tests not written (%) 1.4 Chris Hadfield [Public] Milton ESL (%): 2.0 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 21. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 2.2 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 18.9 — Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.0 — Writing 2.2 Overall rank: 1038/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.7 2.900: -0.8 1.2 4.7 2.8 2.6 25.3 E M 0.5 6.6 — F 0.5 Writing 2.5 2.0 2.2 F 0.7 2.2 — 2.3 2.0 Gr 6 avg.9 2.8 2.7 1.6 Tests not written (%) 4.8 2.8 p 0.6 16.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2.5 2.5 52.5 56.9 5.7 2.6 27.1 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.9 3.0 3.6 — Bruce Trail [Public] Milton Gr 6 enrollment: 70 ESL (%): 5.5 Special needs (%): 13.3 2.3 — Math 2.5 p .5 36.7 Math 3.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.7 3.5 2. of $124.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 25.9 3.0 Gr 6 avg.1 n/a n/a M 0.7 2.1 6.1 6.7 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.3 p Tests not written (%) 1.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — 5.7 2.2 — Writing 2.4 21.3 E n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.8 2.9 27.7 — 2.8 2.6 5.0 3.3 21.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 55. level: Reading 2.0 2.4 4. of $109.5 2.7 — 2.000: 0.6 2. inc.2 — 41.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 3 1.7 Gr 6 avg.9 2.0 29.5 2.7 3. of $138.6 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.8 Writing 2.5 2. inc.9 — 2.5 2.6 18.9 2.9 — Math 2.7 4.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — Captain R Wilson [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 4.8 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 — 2.6 8.600: -0. inc.0 3.9 24.9 2.8 3.8 2.4 — F 0.8 — Writing 2.8 5.8 18.6 — Alexander’s [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 0.5 2.2 31.1 M 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2. inc.9 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 — 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 46.9 3.8 3.6 2.9 3.6 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2. Beaudoin [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 80 ESL (%): 1.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 41.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 7.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.1 M 0.7 7.6 4.7 2.2 M 0.7 Overall rank: 295/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.6 — F 0.9 2.7 3.7 — HALTON AREA Abbey Lane [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.700: -1.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 75 Special needs (%): 10.3 Tests below standard (%) 38.7 — 2.1 E p Math F 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.7 2.5 — 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.9 3.0 3.3 M 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 5.6 4.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.2 7 7.1 6.5 2.8 2.5 2.5 Overall rank: 396/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 Math 2.1 F 0.6 — 26.4 8 7.6 2.6 2.4 E n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.6 M 0.8 Math 2.8 p Math 2.6 2.8 p 2.8 2.8 1.8 2.1 3.0 3.7 2.8 Writing 2.6 Writing 2.2 — Writing 2.0 2.1 q 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.1 — F 0. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.9 56.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 6 6.2 F 0.6 2.9 — 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.7 — 3.4 2.900: 0.3 Writing 2.3 16.1 3.2 — F 0.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 3.3 2.7 — F 0.5 2.3 F 0.9 p Writing 2.2 q 30.0 2.6 2.3 M 0.6 q 2.7 2. inc.3 Tests not written (%) 3.8 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.9 2.6 — 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.7 2.2 6.7 — Writing 2.6 6.9 3.0 — Math 2. inc. of $110.6 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 25.3 1.9 6.0 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 3.2 — 2.1 2.1 n/a 30.7 5.8 5.9 3.9 2.9 3.6 2.9 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.5 7.1 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.6 — F 0.4 E F 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Writing 2.2 — Writing 2.9 3.6 2.900: -1.8 — Math 2.7 2.7 2.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.7 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.3 34.1 1.7 Gr 6 avg.7 Overall rating out of 10 5 Ascension [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 0.5 2. inc.6 2.7 2.5 n/a Charles R.0 3.8 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 0.6 31.2 F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.4 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 7. inc.6 — 2.3 p 5.5 6.0 3.7 2.6 Math 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.1 2.8 2.9 2.0 2.0 — 2.2 5.2 — 30.5 3.1 — Central [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 2.500: 1.1 M 0.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.4 — 5.6 2.2 — 2.9 3.0 Gr 6 avg.7 2.600: 0.6 2.5 2.1 2.9 2.9 — 2.5 2.2 F 0.8 3. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 1. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 F 0.4 F 0.4 2. inc.2 1.1 F 0.0 2.9 2.7 2.1 Math M 0.0 Special needs (%): 18.1 M 0.0 32.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 6.8 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.5 — 6.3 18.900: 0.1 p 2.5 2.1 — F 0.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.200: -0. level: Reading 2.3 2.7 2.1 M 0.9 2.4 2.9 2.5 2.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 — 2.9 3.6 — Writing 2.2 34.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0.0 p 3.9 2.5 2.4 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 29.3 Special needs (%): 8.7 2.4 Math F 0.400: 0.3 25.1 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 — 2.4 2.4 — 2.0 — 6.9 2.4 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.7 1.2 F 0.2 14.1 6 6.5 2.9 3.9 — 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 32. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 62.1 n/a n/a 25.0 37.3 2.0 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.2 44. of $86. of $79.0 q 5.7 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 7.1 Overall rank: 2698/2742 2270/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.5 F 0.0 3. inc.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 3.1 1.4 32.7 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 11.0 2.8 3.8 33.3 5.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.2 Tests not written (%) 0.9 — 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.2 F 0.1 M 0.4 Math 2.5 — 3. level: Reading 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.4 6.3 Math M 0.0 Overall rank: 438/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.9 2.7 2.2 E E F 0.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 7.5 8.6 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 41.3 — F 0.4 Math 2.1 M 0. of $89.4 32.3 Tests below standard (%) 41.4 6.6 32.9 2.7 2.4 24.1 F 0.8 Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 44.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.6 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 15.1 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1677/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 15.9 34.7 2.7 3.200: -4.0 2. of $106.4 2.7 2.8 2.2 3.9 Math 2.8 2.7 5.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 Math 2.2 F 0.9 2.1 F 0.3 F 0.5 2.8 Tests not written (%) 1.8 — 2.6 2.6 Math 2.8 2.1 M 0.6 2.3 F 0.6 2.3 Writing 2.2 F 0.5 q Brookdale [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 6.8 Writing 2.3 2.0 4.4 F 0.7 2. of $78.3 — Canadian Martyrs [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 0.2 F 0.6 4.8 q 5.9 Math 2.1 2.8 q Overall rating out of 10 7 6.1 — Brant Hills [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.9 2.5 2.6 Writing 2.6 F 0.3 2.8 2.1 F 0. of $141.1 F 0.7 2.6 2.7 Math 3.8 2.0 — F 0.4 20.1 M 0.0 0.5 2.6 Math 2.6 F 0.5 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.5 Tests not written (%) 1. inc. of $93.600: 0.3 — 19.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.7 2.6 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 9.8 — Brookville [Public] Campbellville ESL (%): 2.2 0.5 0.5 2.7 — 2.6 — 3.4 F 0.6 2.4 F 0.4 — 3.8 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.7 3.0 2.5 2.4 9.5 — 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.1 Math M 0.6 2.4 2.6 2.1 F 0.1 1.9 — 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.4 2.6 5.1 M 0.7 11.6 F 0.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 28.7 Math 2.6 2.7 q 2.1 1.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 34.1 — 2.8 3.5 — C H Norton [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.0 2. inc.9 3.8 2. of $110.3 — 7.1 Tests not written (%) 6.6 Writing 2.1 2.2 M 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 7.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.1 F 0.9 3.4 F 0.2 F 0.7 n/a Bruce T Lindley [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 0.4 — Math 2.9 2.8 5.6 2.8 Math 2.3 M 0.0 3. of $78. level: Reading 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 3.8 2.9 7 5.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — 6.4 F 0.1 1.0 Special needs (%): 5.5 2.7 — 2.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 14.6 2.4 2.4 25.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2. of $61.1 0.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — Math n/a F 0.9 2.8 2.7 2.4 F 0.1 3.

inc.4 2.0 3.5 3.0 Math 3.2 3.2 E M 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 23.9 — Math 2.9 — 3.8 2.3 — .3 2.7 2.3 5.8 2.6 35.3 7.4 2.2 F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 2.8 2. of $134.2 F 0.0 2.6 3.1 F 0.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 16.0 — Writing 2.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 2.8 2.1 F 0.8 — Tests not written (%) 7.3 q Math M 0.6 17.9 6. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2. of $91.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 19.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.7 2.2 F 0.0 2.8 8.2 Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.6 2.8 3.3 8.6 Writing 2. inc.1 M 0.1 — M 0.400: -0.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.9 3.6 31.4 F 0.2 — 4.5 — Forest Trail [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 37.9 2.5 6.8 2.1 0.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 27.4 Overall rating out of 10 4 31 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 8.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 6.7 2.0 Writing 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 17.900: 0.2 E F 0.8 — Math 2.5 2.7 p F 0.5 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.3 F 0. inc.8 0.1 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 3.1 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 12.1 F 0.7 2.7 2.1 M 0.4 Overall rank: 166/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 F 0.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 33.4 5.7 Writing 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.7 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 8.4 2.9 34.8 p Writing 2.7 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.2 Overall rank: 714/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 Writing 2.0 22.9 — 6.4 n/a F 0.1 3.1 F 0.5 7.0 2.6 6.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.8 2.6 2.7 2. inc.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 3.6 2.2 39.0 — 2. inc.8 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.9 q 3.6 31.9 0.1 — 7 6.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Clarksdale [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 1.6 — Writing 2.8 3.8 43.6 2.6 6 6.6 7.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.0 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 Writing 2.3 0.1 2.5 28.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.3 Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0. inc.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.3 Gr 6 avg.5 6.0 3.1 7.6 2.2 2.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 16.0 p Tests not written (%) 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 12.4 F 0.6 0.0 Special needs (%): 11.0 30.7 7.7 2.8 2.2 28.9 37.8 2.7 2.8 — 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.5 2.1 F 0.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.5 3.9 2.6 10.7 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.1 20.6 n/a Gardiner [Public] Georgetown Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 2.0 n/a Emily Carr [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 8.6 — 1.9 3.0 q 1.6 2.6 2.8 7.700: 0.9 — Math 2. of $91.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 2.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.6 7.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 M 0.6 2.8 2.7 — Writing 2.1 M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.0 3.0 0.0 3.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.2 0. inc.8 5.4 — 29.2 Math F 0.2 Writing 2.5 2.8 — Math 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.400: 0. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.6 q Falgarwood [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 92 ESL (%): 5.2 p 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 40. of $174.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 p 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.7 2.1 — 46.3 Overall rank: 511/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — 26.2 5. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 2.9 3.5 2.5 — 2. of $130.5 n/a n/a F 0.8 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 29.7 2.5 — 2.1 Tests not written (%) 2.1 — F 0.8 2.3 E F 0.6 2.9 — Writing 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1655/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Math F 0.8 2.9 Overall rank: 667/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Glenview [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.7 3. inc.1 2.7 2.8 3. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1156/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 0. of $86.4 n/a 25.1 3.0 Special needs (%): 3.8 2.0 2.6 2.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 32.8 0.3 Special needs (%): 12.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 3.8 1.2 Gr 6 avg.0 2.6 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 4. inc.5 — 6.7 2.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 15.1 E F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.3 10.0 p Gr 6 avg.800: 1.7 n/a Math n/a 2.0 2. of $113.5 4.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.2 M 0.5 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.0 2.0 3.5 2.3 F 0.9 Special needs (%): 13.1 0.0 3.1 6.7 2.5 3.6 — 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8 5.1 F 0.7 2.7 — 2.0 Math 3.2 3.8 5.0 27.5 Math 2.5 Math 2. inc.8 26.6 2.5 3.6 — 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 53.2 3.600: -0.8 2.7 — 2.8 2.7 Math 2.5 2.1 5. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 — F 0.6 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.0 2.6 — Eastview [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 7.6 2.6 2.0 2.6 — Math 2.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 6.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.3 — Math 3.6 — 3.2 3. inc.4 n/a Heritage Glen [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 17.8 — 2.1 F 0.7 q 3.2 37. of $115. level: Reading 2.500: -1.8 Writing 2.900: -1.1 — F 0.3 5.2 Tests below standard (%) 39.7 — 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E M 0.1 31.3 Tests not written (%) 5.9 q 3.1 F 0.0 22.4 5.4 20.9 2.5 2.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6. inc.7 Math 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 7.8 q 0.0 Writing 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 Math 2.1 3.5 2.5 Math 2.3 45.6 Writing 2.4 13.8 2.9 q F 0.5 2.5 — 6.0 Special needs (%): 4.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2. of $88.4 2. level: Reading n/a 2.7 2.5 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 23.6 3.6 3.4 2.3 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.1 Math M 0.9 40.6 2.8 2.9 3.4 5.3 Tests not written (%) 5.6 — Writing 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.9 Special needs (%): 9.5 33.9 3.3 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 8. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.3 F 0.1 6.9 16.7 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 5. of $105.1 E E p 14.0 2.2 M 0.5 2.3 M 0.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 3.2 3. of $108.3 3.9 2.7 — Frontenac [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 0.9 2.1 0.7 2.0 4.8 — F 0.5 2.3 F 0.1 6.7 — Math 2.5 n/a F 0.6 — 2. inc.8 32.2 E M 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 21.3 F 0.6 4.7 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 Math 2.7 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.6 — 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.7 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 2.5 3.9 5.8 — 8.9 — 3.9 — 6.0 2.8 30.9 Math 3.200: -0.6 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 1.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 8 7.5 n/a E n/a n/a F 0.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — F 0.9 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.0 0.9 — 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.8 2.3 30.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.3 30.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.8 — Writing 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 39. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 19.3 3.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.7 2.5 2.5 Writing 2.6 2.6 2.9 1.0 Special needs (%): 14.8 — Writing 3.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 2.5 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.700: -1.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 9.3 2.6 n/a Guardian Angels [Catholic] Milton Gr 6 enrollment: 85 ESL (%): 0.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.700: -0.4 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — Math 2.7 2.4 Overall rank: 667/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Florence Meares [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 5.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. of $89.6 2.2 2.1 6.7 2.8 — Math 2.9 2.1 F 0.7 7.7 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 3.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 — Holy Cross [Catholic] Halton Hills ESL (%): 1.7 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 5.5 — Writing 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 5.6 4.9 q 2.8 2.5 F 0.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 3.3 F 0.5 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 30.3 3.8 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.6 — 2.6 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 n/a Gladys Speers [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 6.0 3.4 2.4 q du Sacré-Coeur [Catholic] Halton Hills Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.2 — Hawthorne Village [Public] Milton Gr 6 enrollment: 103 ESL (%): 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 5.6 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.5 39.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.3 — Math F 0.700: 0.2 M 0.8 — Math 2.600: 0.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 E — F 0.1 E F 0.8 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.7 2. of $74.3 0.9 36.6 2.4 2.7 2.1 — Writing 3.7 2.1 F 0.5 5.8 2.7 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.0 2.6 2.9 2.2 3.4 23.7 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.

8 8 7.3 F 0.1 0.6 6.3 4.6 2.5 2.4 Math F 0.8 4. level: Reading 2.5 3.8 2. inc.4 3. of $112.2 18.7 2.7 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.3 E n/a n/a M 0.9 — Math 3.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a n/a 44.9 2.0 2.5 2.5 q 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.0 3.0 Gr 6 avg.9 2.6 3.8 2.3 F 0.7 2.5 2.9 — 7.9 2.5 13.8 2.8 2.9 2.0 51.2 — Gr 6 avg.0 — John T Tuck [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.2 n/a 33.8 3.4 17.0 Math 2.9 2. inc.9 2.6 E F 0.1 3. level: Reading 2.2 7.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.8 4.4 2.2 M 0.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 Math 2.9 p 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.0 5.2 n/a E F 0.6 6.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.3 M 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.9 — Holy Rosary [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0. of $74.9 2.6 — 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1443/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 36.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 4.300: 1.0 2.8 — Math 2.7 3.8 2.0 3.7 2.7 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 3.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.100: -0.5 2.9 Math 3.5 2.8 2.6 2.7 — Writing 2.1 F 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 n/a Munns [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.9 2.7 25. level: Reading 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 3.1 E M 0. level: Reading 2.1 2.0 — 2.3 — F 0. level: Reading 2.1 3.9 2.1 E M 0.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 35.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — Math M 0.2 21.0 2.1 — 21.8 — 2.9 2.9 2.7 — Math 2.4 1.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Orchard Park [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 2.0 2.5 2.9 2.4 2.6 5.2 1.9 — 2.1 7.0 — Gr 6 avg.2 E F 0.1 — Math 3.1 4.3 2.1 5.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 23.8 2.7 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 29.9 n/a 2.0 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — Lorne Skuce [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 6.6 2.1 F 0. inc.9 3.400: 1.8 5.7 Math 2.1 12.0 2.3 20.6 — 2.1 2.700: -0. of $156.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 3.0 3.6 — Writing 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.9 n/a Joshua Creek [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 9.8 3.1 E F 0.7 2.3 E — Math M 0.4 — 11.9 2.7 Writing 2.7 2. inc.9 2.3 E E n/a 35. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.5 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 3.7 3.7 — 2.2 F 0.3 F 0.8 — Writing 2.1 F 0.0 2.9 Writing 3.0 Special needs (%): 3.6 2.0 n/a 3.9 — Writing 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 37.6 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 2.4 11.1 3.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 — Math 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 3.6 Overall rank: 714/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E M 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Holy Rosary [Catholic] Milton ESL (%): 0.3 3.6 2.0 p Gr 6 avg.8 45.2 3.0 3.1 3.9 — 2.8 7 7.2 43.1 — Tests not written (%) 7.6 q 6.0 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.5 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.7 2.1 — 2.1 — Lakeshore [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.5 — Mother Teresa [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 82 ESL (%): 0.9 17.8 Gr 6 avg.6 — Math 2.3 34. level: Reading 2.8 2.6 2.800: -0.1 F 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.5 2.500: -0.3 6.3 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $86.3 — 5.1 21.3 Writing 2.2 3.9 2.9 2.9 — Writing 2.9 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.3 M 0.0 2.0 36.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 7.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.8 Tests not written (%) 1.3 Math M 0.5 — .5 2. of $98.9 — Writing 2.6 3. inc.8 8.7 22.5 2.8 0.9 47.7 — n/a M 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 50.7 2.6 — Writing 2.4 2.8 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 3.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 3.4 4. level: Reading 2.9 6.0 n/a 3.9 2.7 2.2 2.4 Math 2.8 2.7 2.6 3.1 3.000: -0.0 — 3.1 7. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.800: -0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 3.1 3.2 n/a F 0.7 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 2.7 8.7 2.4 4.9 3.9 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.9 3.8 n/a 3.2 28.4 2.1 F 0.7 2.4 7.6 2. level: Reading 2.0 — Writing 2.0 3.4 — 0.4 2.8 2.2 16.5 n/a 3.7 — 2.6 2.3 2.9 8.8 2.1 2.4 Overall rank: 2035/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 2.7 12.6 Overall rank: 573/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — 6.6 6.6 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.4 — 27.8 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 3.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.800: 0.2 3.8 2.8 3.0 3.5 Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.5 — Writing 2.0 1.9 Math 2.7 2.7 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 4.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1948/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — F 0.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.2 40.9 2. of $109.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Special needs (%): 23.3 14.7 — 2.1 F 0.8 2.5 6. inc.6 — Math 2.8 2.7 Math 2.0 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.4 F 0. inc.9 3.6 2.7 — Writing 2.9 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 45.9 2.9 — Math 2.0 — Math 2.9 2.1 — Mohawk Gardens [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.2 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.4 — Writing 2.1 6.6 2.6 3.6 Writing 2.5 2.0 2.7 3.6 2.1 n/a M 0.32 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Holy Family [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.3 F 0.6 — 2.8 Math 2.7 4.4 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 0.8 23.7 Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.9 2.4 Tests not written (%) 9.2 F 0.3 3.7 7.5 2.8 2.1 5.4 2.3 3.9 — 2.1 17.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.2 — Math F 0.6 2.4 F 0.7 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 17.6 — 4.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 2.6 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 35.7 5.7 39.1 F 0.5 F 0.1 M 0.1 3.8 Writing 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 67 Special needs (%): 3.5 2.8 p Math 2. of $84.1 0.2 — 0.1 3.6 3.1 61.6 2.7 2.2 32.8 Math 3.4 5.6 n/a n/a F 0.6 — 2. of $81.0 p 3.5 2.4 — Kilbride [Public] Kilbride Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 2.1 3.7 2.2 3.5 — 2.2 M 0.1 4.5 Overall rank: 1655/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.9 n/a 3.3 F 0.2 7.9 Writing 2.2 — McKenzie-Smith Bennett [Public] Acton Gr 6 enrollment: 100 ESL (%): 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 34.8 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 3.9 3.100: -0. inc.2 F 0.5 — F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.2 25.0 2.1 Overall rank: 1285/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 7.3 2.8 23.8 — 2.1 F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 4.0 0.6 Writing 2.7 2.1 — F 0.9 2.9 8.4 n/a Math M 0.7 2.1 F 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.8 — 2. inc.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 n/a 8.2 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 20.7 1.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 18.7 1.8 1.6 2. inc.2 26.7 — Math 2.4 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 34.6 36.400: 0.6 33.8 5. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 1.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.1 3.2 7.4 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 23.8 — Math 2.9 3.4 1.8 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 45.1 28.5 Overall rank: 360/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 1.7 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.0 2.6 4.9 3.3 n/a n/a M 0.4 2.9 5.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 9.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 — Math 2.0 2.1 Math M 0.3 2.7 3.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.7 Gr 6 avg.2 — Math E E F 0.6 8.3 p 6.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 8.3 F 0.2 39.7 — 3.2 2.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 34.8 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 3.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 2.3 E F 0.2 F 0.6 2.8 3.8 8.1 — Kings Road [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.4 F 0.9 5.1 — Writing 3.2 19.6 3.3 4.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.9 2.9 3.3 2.9 — 2.400: 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 5.5 6.6 2.8 2.9 5.5 2.2 36.2 F 0.8 Special needs (%): 8.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.2 3.0 n/a F 0.4 29.8 2.6 2.9 1.0 2.6 2. inc.1 7.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.2 Writing 2. of $87.7 — Math 2.1 6.7 2.7 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 7.5 3.3 F 0.7 2.200: -1.5 2.9 3.3 0. of $92.6 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a 15.4 — F 0.7 F 0.8 2.0 2.9 2.7 2.600: 0.9 2.3 7. inc.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 11.9 2.7 Overall rank: 86/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 n/a Maplehurst [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6. level: Reading 2. of $138.1 1.7 2.8 2.0 — F 0.4 29.3 24.0 20.9 3. of $157.4 9.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 0.1 3.0 2.4 F 0. of $86.2 M 0.8 3.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 2.9 7.6 Writing 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.6 2.1 E F 0.8 2.8 14.3 2.2 M 0.1 p Tests below standard (%) 26.2 n/a n/a F 0.2 F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 1. inc.4 2.3 5.600: -0.6 2.0 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 35.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.3 39.8 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.4 6.3 5.0 Special needs (%): 12.7 2.7 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7 8.6 F 0.6 q Overall rating out of 10 6.8 3.8 10. of $66.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 5.7 2.4 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.9 2.5 2.8 3.9 2. of $85.0 2.6 2.8 4.0 36.8 — Writing 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.

6 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — 7.8 3.4 0.6 — 2.5 7.8 3.8 5. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 — F 0.1 F 0.2 — Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 13.9 2.0 10.9 3.0 5.6 Overall rank: 1215/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 21.2 F 0.4 2.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 6.5 27.7 2.6 Tests not written (%) 4.5 p Writing 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 29.9 2.2 3.900: 0.8 — 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.6 F 0.6 Writing 2.7 Math 2.4 Math F 0.6 p 2.0 2.6 Overall rank: 1038/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2. inc.4 2.2 F 0.2 2.9 7.0 2. inc.6 — 2.7 2.4 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.0 2.1 2.5 Tests not written (%) 0.1 E E E F 0.2 Special needs (%): 21.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 — Writing 2.8 3.2 E E F 0.500: 0.0 2.8 29.9 2.5 — 24.6 1.0 — 3.9 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.0 30.3 F 0.2 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 9.8 2.0 0.7 2.8 2.7 26.3 Math F 0.7 2.4 30.0 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 3.9 3.8 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 Math 3.3 2. of $96. inc.1 8.7 2.4 2.700: -0.4 6.8 3.7 7.7 — Math 2.0 2.6 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.1 3. of $92.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.0 2.7 2.1 2.8 2.9 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Writing 2.8 2.7 2.6 — F 0.6 2.1 n/a M 0. level: Reading 3.5 9. of $86.6 1.3 Our Lady of Victory [Catholic] Milton Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 F 0.9 2.1 Writing 3.6 2.3 — .7 3.6 3.8 q 1.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.6 2.5 2.9 n/a Sacred Heart of Jesus [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 1.7 — 2.7 — Math 2.1 F 0.3 q Tests below standard (%) 21.6 Math 2.1 2.6 — 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.1 5.8 — 2. inc.7 3.7 2.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 27 Special needs (%): 3.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.1 3.2 E M 0.2 Math 3. inc.3 17. of $130. of $99.8 Math 2.2 — M 0.8 3.0 2.2 F 0.9 17.6 — Writing 2.3 5.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.1 38.9 2.8 2.3 — Rolling Meadows [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 18.9 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 — 6.7 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.1 Tests not written (%) 2.1 2.3 21.3 6.0 Special needs (%): 5.7 2.0 38.2 q 6.6 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a 56.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.3 3.1 — 33.6 2.2 2.7 6.0 Overall rank: 1991/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 — F 0. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.9 2.5 3.9 2.6 2. of $137.5 2.7 — 2.9 2.1 2.7 — 2.9 2.8 2.9 7.7 — Math 2.6 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.0 2.6 2.9 2.3 39.8 Writing 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.4 M 0.7 3.8 — 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 12.1 5.1 37.9 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.5 Writing 2.4 F 0.2 5.5 2.8 2.2 6.1 Math 3.0 — 2.7 2.1 Gr 6 avg.0 — F 0.0 — Patricia-Picknell [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 94.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 F 0.1 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.0 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.6 n/a Pineland [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 1.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 31.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.7 Math 2.2 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.9 3.0 3.9 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.0 3.5 20.7 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 5.5 27.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 46/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 Tests not written (%) 2.600: 0.3 26.6 2.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3.3 7.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 21.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.5 2.9 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 2.7 5. inc.7 2.8 2. inc.2 q Overall rating out of 10 4.1 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3.7 3.8 — Math 2.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 13.5 2.0 — Writing 3.2 M 0.1 F 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 5 Paul A Fisher [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.1 Special needs (%): 12.1 — F 0.8 — 2.3 q 33 Gr 6 enrollment: 71 Special needs (%): 4.1 M 0. of $117.7 2. of $129.2 F 0.4 F 0.9 32.9 2.7 2.7 32.2 2.5 7. level: Reading 2.7 — F 0.1 M 0.9 Writing 2.8 0. level: Reading 2.2 24.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 30.8 2.6 — 3.1 E p F 0.3 Overall rank: 360/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.5 3.9 7.1 — 33.9 3.2 6.8 2.2 — Math E E M 0. inc.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 2.5 2.2 F 0.1 E F 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.9 p 2.4 2.8 — 2.8 — 2.8 2.7 2.8 Math 2.8 2.7 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 Overall rating out of 10 7 Ryerson [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 0.7 — 2.8 — Math 2.7 2.200: -1.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 8.0 2.8 9.1 n/a n/a Math F 0.7 — 2.8 3.4 41.1 5.8 2.1 F 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 33.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.6 0.2 8 7.7 — 6.9 — 4.9 2.6 2.1 M 0.1 2.3 — E M 0.8 2.6 3. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 q 7 6.1 24. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.0 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.8 2.9 2.7 1.1 3.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.9 3.4 6 7.1 7.7 — 3. level: Reading 2.400: 1.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 6. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.3 — River Oaks [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 3. inc.8 2.3 2.1 Gr 6 avg.2 6.9 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2. level: Reading 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.6 Writing 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.100: -0.7 8. of $83.8 6.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.3 E — Math F 0.7 — Writing 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.4 Overall rank: 511/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rank: 667/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.8 Math 2.1 26.1 — 29.1 M 0.9 Writing 3.0 2.7 — 8.7 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 4.6 2.0 3.7 2.3 F 0.6 2.8 19.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.0 7.9 — 1.8 6.9 33.6 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 — Math 3.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.2 Math M 0.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.300: 0.3 M 0.2 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 Writing 2.1 F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.9 2.7 — 2.7 2.3 3.9 4.7 3.8 7.8 — Math 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 8.6 3.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.2 7.1 7.0 28.8 2.4 Special needs (%): 25.0 3.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 M 0.4 2.600: -0.6 2.9 2.1 3.9 6. of $105.6 2.2 Math M 0.8 2.4 25.6 7 7.8 q Overall rating out of 10 8.0 — 3.8 2.7 2.8 3. of $124.3 Sainte-Marie [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 Writing 2.6 Math 2.7 Math 2.9 q Gr 6 avg.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.2 37.3 3.2 M 0. level: Reading 3. of $130.0 2.8 2. level: Reading 3.8 2. level: Reading 3.5 F 0.6 2.7 2.1 3.8 2.4 2.4 Math 2.7 2.9 2.9 5.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.8 3.9 2.3 — E M 0.8 2.0 14.1 3.8 2.7 3.6 3.5 2. level: Reading 2. inc.2 F 0.7 — Writing 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 3.3 F 0.9 2.4 Gr 6 avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.3 7.9 — 2.1 — 9.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 2.3 3.6 Math 2.1 3.2 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 19.8 — F 0.8 3.7 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 39.0 — Writing 2.6 1.8 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.6 2.3 9.9 Pope John Paul II [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 4.200: -0.8 2.1 M 0.3 F 0.9 60.2 — Math F 0.9 2.9 3.0 Writing 2.6 22.8 3.0 — Math 2.6 38.6 2.8 3.9 — 2.6 3.2 3.0 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 32.0 7.9 — 2.6 — Post’s Corners [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 1.9 2.8 2.6 2.0 Overall rank: 1156/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0. of $71.2 F 0.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.9 2.3 n/a M 0. inc.5 Special needs (%): 9.9 2.7 2.7 18.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 — Math 3.9 Tests not written (%) 5.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 77 Special needs (%): 10.2 3.9 25.9 2.0 3.100: 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 1.9 7 6.7 2.5 — 2.9 30.4 — Pine Grove [Public] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 0.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.0 2.2 2. of $91.7 — 5.400: -2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 q 2.8 2.5 11.7 7.4 3.8 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 5.4 F 0.8 2.7 2.9 26.6 2.9 22. inc.0 — 2.6 2.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.7 15.8 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 7.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 2.7 2. inc.7 2.2 3.5 2.2 — 2.6 2.9 — Writing 2. inc.0 3.9 2.7 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 Gr 6 avg.2 M 0.7 0.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.0 23.3 Tests not written (%) 2.9 8.8 — 2.7 2.8 2.1 29.4 n/a n/a n/a 27.6 2.3 2.1 — 3.9 2.8 6.4 Tests not written (%) 1.2 Math 3.6 2.8 — 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E E E F 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — Math 2.7 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 27.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 27.7 — 9.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.0 2.9 2.5 Overall rank: 1038/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.800: -1.6 3.5 Tests below standard (%) 11.5 0.7 6.9 — Writing 2.8 — Writing 2.1 F 0.5 — 2.8 2.0 3.1 Writing 3.1 M 0.0 2. level: Reading 2.5 15.0 Special needs (%): 1.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Our Lady of Peace [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 88 ESL (%): 1. level: Reading 2.3 E M 0.8 2.9 2.6 2.8 — 2.0 0.9 — Math 2.6 2.7 2.5 — Pilgrim Wood [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 1.800: 1.6 2.7 — Pauline Johnson [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 9.8 23.7 2.000: -0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — 2.6 Writing 2.4 Writing 2.6 2.7 2. of $149.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.3 4.8 3.7 2.6 6.1 n/a n/a n/a F 0.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 23.8 q 1.7 3.5 2.8 2.7 — Math 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 1.7 2.6 2.3 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.

800: -0.9 1.9 q 12.9 2.7 2.7 3.9 2.3 F 0.8 — Writing 2.0 3.7 4.9 2.3 p Gr 6 avg.2 2.2 6.2 — 27. inc.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 28.4 7.5 2.6 2.8 3. of $188.3 2.8 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.000: 0.2 F 0.8 2.0 3.7 4.0 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Math 2.9 4 4.1 — F 0.1 F 0.1 20.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.4 Overall rank: 98/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 88 Special needs (%): 19.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.6 28.9 — 2.7 3.4 28. level: Reading 2.0 3.7 2.8 — 2.0 2.1 24.6 4.1 21.7 — Math 2.6 Writing 2.3 p 2.8 Gr 6 avg.7 2.7 3.5 2.9 3.3 F 0.0 — St Catherine of Alexandria [Catholic] Georgetown Gr 6 enrollment: 79 ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.300: -1.5 Writing 2. of $130. inc.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 Overall rank: 438/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.000: 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 25.8 2.9 3.6 2.1 3.9 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.5 2.2 — Math 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 27.8 2.9 2.8 2.2 0.8 2.0 5.4 2. inc.1 3.5 45.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.3 M 0.0 — 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 24.9 2.9 2.8 Writing 2.7 2.6 — 7.8 7.0 p 3.7 2.8 Tests not written (%) 5.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 Math 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.1 — 17.1 21.8 2.4 — 2.1 3.0 — 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 22. inc.5 2.8 7.7 7.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 9.2 F 0.6 3.7 — F 0.9 3.1 E E F 0.4 28.8 q 2.9 2.1 F 0.7 q 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 7.9 3.7 Writing 2.9 Gr 6 avg.1 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 — 3.6 2.5 q 2.4 19.9 3. inc.7 1.8 2.4 20.2 3.1 2.2 — F 0.6 2.0 2.0 — Writing 2.0 3.9 3.5 — 1.6 21.0 — Writing 2.5 25. level: Reading 2.0 3.7 2.4 F 0.9 3.9 Math 2.1 — F 0.1 Math M 0.8 6.9 3.4 Math M 0. of $79.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 26.3 7 6.5 8.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 Writing 2.6 3. level: Reading 2.9 19.9 14.2 Tests not written (%) 3.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7. level: Reading 2.0 19.0 3.5 F 0.8 2.8 2.7 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.0 Math 3.3 Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.8 — Math 2.1 E M 0.9 8.7 2.9 7.9 2.7 2.7 2.9 4.5 2.900: 0.8 2.9 2.4 3.2 — Gr 6 avg.8 3.4 M 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — St Bernadette [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 7.1 3.1 7.7 2.7 2.2 3.9 12.5 20.5 — 2.7 3.0 Tests not written (%) 1.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 — Tests below standard (%) 25.1 3.9 — Writing 2.1 3.2 Overall rating out of 10 8.7 7.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.3 F 0.7 Math 2.9 2.0 2.1 F 0.2 q Overall rating out of 10 7 7.1 F 0.4 M 0.7 7.1 E p 31.8 3.0 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 12. level: Reading 2.8 1.3 F 0. inc.6 Writing 2.4 Tests not written (%) 4.1 — Writing 2.9 3.1 E E M 0.4 2. inc. of $88.9 — Writing 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.4 Special needs (%): 16.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 6.7 Math 3.5 2.5 0.7 2.8 2.1 p Math 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 4.0 3.6 2.3 2.9 p Silver Creek [Public] Georgetown ESL (%): 1.6 2.1 M 0.7 3.6 6.8 — 2.8 Writing 2.1 41.8 2.9 3.7 2.9 7.2 E F 0.0 3.8 — 2.9 3.9 2.8 2.9 2.300: 1.0 3.0 3.300: 0.3 — Sam Sherratt [Public] Milton ESL (%): 1.0 7. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 Writing 3.8 2.0 — Writing 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.2 — Math E F 0.3 3.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 21.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 — 2.9 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.6 29.3 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 97 Special needs (%): 18.2 F 0.1 15.4 2.5 4.8 3.9 6.7 2.6 2.4 2.4 22.2 M 0.9 2.8 — 3.9 2.4 2.1 M 0.0 3.2 — 2.8 2.6 2.0 4.1 p Writing 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 3.1 7.7 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Overall rank: 787/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.000: -0.8 2.7 2.4 2.5 Math 2.7 p F 0.9 2.6 27. level: Reading 2.1 q Tests not written (%) 4.0 2.8 2.9 p 2.8 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. inc.4 — 7.1 M 0.0 2.3 13. of $92.6 19.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 26.3 F 0.7 7.6 2.8 2.9 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 4.3 13.7 43.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E E F 0.8 2.6 2.8 3.9 2.1 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 Tests not written (%) 13.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 75 Special needs (%): 13.4 3.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — 7.900: 2.6 2.9 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 — 4.8 2.2 7.2 6.0 3.9 2.8 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 F 0.7 24.8 n/a Gr 6 avg. inc.0 — Math 3.8 2.8 19.1 F 0.8 — 2.8 2.5 — St Gabriel [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 — 2.0 2.9 3.6 2.3 Tests not written (%) 6.5 2.8 Gr 6 avg.9 2.000: 1.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.4 7.8 2.7 Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.0 1.1 — Math M 0.6 7.7 2.0 1.9 — 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 0.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 2.8 0.9 2.9 — 3.9 2.3 Math F 0.9 3.1 E — 21.1 Overall rank: 438/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 — 6.2 3.0 Gr 6 avg.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 — St Francis of Assisi [Catholic] Georgetown Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 0.7 6.8 Math 3.9 2.8 22.0 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 1.7 3.3 F 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Math 2.2 M 0.7 Math 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 8.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 M 0.4 M 0.8 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $118.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 q Writing 2.1 — 50.0 — F 0.0 Writing 3.8 2.6 n/a n/a 31.8 Math 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 2.8 3.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2. inc. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.1 E E M 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 n/a St Dominic [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 0.0 2.5 F 0.8 2.9 — E F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 n/a St James [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.3 2.3 Writing 2.4 — 7.2 — 1.1 p Math E F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.8 6.34 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Saint-Philippe [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.2 — 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 3.800: 1.0 Special needs (%): 8.9 2.6 7.4 F 0.1 — M 0.8 2.9 2.200: 0.0 p St Brigid [Catholic] Georgetown ESL (%): 0. of $131.9 2.1 — F 0.8 2.7 — Sir Ernest Macmillan [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 71 ESL (%): 1.4 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7. inc.8 3.8 Writing 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 66 Special needs (%): 19.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.8 2.2 1.1 15.8 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 — 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 26.8 2.1 — 19.9 3.0 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 30.9 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 23.9 2.8 2.6 F 0.8 q Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.1 M 0.5 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 — F 0.3 2.7 — 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 2.2 6.4 E n/a n/a F 0.8 21.8 4 5.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 24.6 — 2.8 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.9 0.0 3.6 2.8 — Math 2. of $120.4 6.9 — St Elizabeth Seton [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 2.9 — 2.2 F 0.8 Writing 2.6 14.1 F 0.5 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.2 8.2 7.1 — F 0.7 — 1.1 Overall rank: 1215/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 q Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 7.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.7 — Math 3.3 q 2.0 2.6 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 3.1 Math M 0.1 p 23. level: Reading 3.8 Gr 6 avg. of $70.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.700: 0.8 2.9 25.0 0.700: -1.7 2.1 E E F 0.0 — F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.0 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $172.9 — 2.4 F 0.9 3.9 2.9 3.5 19.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 — 0.3 F 0.8 Tests not written (%) 2.0 Math 3.7 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.5 6.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 M 0.7 7.6 — 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 10.5 1.5 M 0.2 3.2 18.0 2.2 F 0.6 47. of $82.3 3.8 Writing 2.1 3.3 50.9 — 2.4 p 2.0 38.9 3.3 M 0.3 E E F 0.2 F 0.8 — 2. inc.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.1 F 0.2 — 5.0 p Math 2.6 Writing 2.2 q .1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.3 Overall rank: 511/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 2.7 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 22.6 8.8 3.9 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8. of $89.7 3.8 Math 2.6 2.8 Writing 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.1 3.8 8.8 16. level: Reading 2.4 22.9 2.5 — St Andrew [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 3.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.5 8.0 24.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 48. inc.7 2.7 Writing 2.9 2.8 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 — 3.9 2.1 — Math F 0.1 3.8 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Math 2.2 3. inc.9 — Math 2.900: 0.9 3.0 3.9 4.7 7.0 3.1 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.1 E F 0.5 7.6 — Writing 2.3 q St Anthony of Padua [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 8.8 2.9 — Math 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.9 — 6. level: Reading 2.0 2.0 2. of $103.1 M 0.1 14.9 — 2.2 M 0.0 3.1 M 0.6 2.6 — 2.1 Tests not written (%) 12.0 0.7 2.9 26.7 2.4 2.6 7.5 2.3 7.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $109.9 2.9 2.6 2.5 — F 0.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.3 2.7 1.9 2.2 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 26.0 3.1 — 2.5 F 0.7 3.3 — M 0.9 2.2 E M 0.2 M 0.7 — 2.6 8.6 2.8 2.2 — E M 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 7.0 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.0 — 7.8 2. level: Reading 2. of $96.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.8 St Christopher [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.1 2.3 — 2.

5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.4 18.5 n/a F 0.1 — St Joseph’s [Catholic] Acton ESL (%): 0.9 — Math 2.0 2.9 — 2.9 — F 0.8 2.1 Tests not written (%) 4.3 7.1 n/a F 0.8 0.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 12.3 Tests below standard (%) 15.6 Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.0 — 3.6 2.7 Math 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 37.8 — 2.1 3.8 Writing 2.5 2.800: 0.1 Overall rank: 475/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Writing 2.7 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — 29.1 n/a F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.1 — St Michaels [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 3.6 3.2 3.8 — 2.1 1.5 Math 2.0 3.9 2.8 6.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $87.9 7.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.5 7.9 2.7 2.8 5.3 F 0.0 3.2 1.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 14.7 7.8 2.7 7.8 2.9 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 p Writing 3.4 2.5 2.7 3.7 p St Joseph’s [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 0.2 — 0.1 — 15.8 2.1 M 0.6 2.0 2.8 3.0 — 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.1 3. level: Reading 3.2 3.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — F 0.6 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 — 2.9 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 7.0 2.9 2.8 Math 2.6 19.9 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.400: 0. of $73.9 Math 2.4 p 2.5 1.4 — Math F 0. level: Reading 2.0 3.8 2. level: Reading 2. inc.5 5.6 F 0.8 5.5 7.4 E F 0.0 3. level: Reading 2. inc.9 2.1 n/a 20.8 22.1 17.9 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 1.9 2.0 — 2. of $109.8 2.1 F 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.5 6.3 — 1.4 F 0.1 E M 0.9 — 3.9 2.3 F 0.8 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 19.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 5.3 F 0.8 2.8 2.7 2.0 p 2.5 2.700: 1.3 F 0.8 2.2 23.8 — 3.8 — Math 2.7 2.8 Writing 2.2 — E M 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.1 3.9 — 3.6 0.9 Writing 2.7 2.9 2.3 F 0.5 8.4 E F 0.0 3.0 Special needs (%): 16.7 2.7 3.7 2.9 — 2.7 2.5 Tests not written (%) 1.4 — 5.1 F 0.0 — 2.9 — 9.3 6.3 F 0. inc.1 3. level: Reading 2.9 — F 0.0 32.3 Tests not written (%) 2.600: -0.1 M 0.0 2.0 3.9 3.8 2.5 Math F 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.0 — 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 35.3 8.8 Special needs (%): 19.8 2.0 1.0 2.7 28.7 2.2 F 0.9 — St Johns [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 4.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 3. of $78.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.5 29.3 — E M 0.7 Math 2.7 2.8 — 6.9 3.1 8.4 Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 2.7 3.5 27.6 2.9 4.9 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 27.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.8 3.8 6.0 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 3.9 3.0 5.7 2.1 31.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.5 15.100: 0.2 F 0.8 2.1 — 29.0 — 2.9 21.6 24.9 Math 2.5 10.9 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7 7.9 2.9 2.5 Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.300: 0.2 E F 0.7 0.0 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 Math 3.3 F 0.9 2.5 4.1 — Math 3.600: 0.9 Math 3.3 p F 0.6 28.8 11.1 — 22.8 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.7 2.1 3.8 2.8 2.6 — 2.7 3.8 — 2.9 7.6 2.5 2.0 3.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.2 — 26.0 3.1 3.4 E F 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 — E M 0. of $105.8 2.9 Writing 2.2 — 26.8 2.9 Math 2.9 2.7 3.7 2. of $83.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.1 2.6 2.3 Math M 0.8 2. inc.8 2.1 F 0.8 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 23.3 p St Raphaels [Catholic] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.6 F 0. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Overall rank: 714/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 Math 2.0 — 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 2.8 3.8 Tests not written (%) 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 40.9 2.400: 0.4 q 6.4 7.0 3.4 2.9 2.1 M 0.9 23.9 2.8 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 26.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.0 25.8 3.7 3.9 3.0 — 7.7 2.8 2.4 5.6 7. level: Reading 2. inc.7 2.9 20. of $165. inc.5 5.3 Special needs (%): 9. inc.1 — 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 14.4 — Tests below standard (%) 28.6 p 3.6 2.1 3.8 3.2 E n/a M 0.2 9. level: Reading 2.8 Writing 2.9 2.8 — 2.5 F 0.7 7.4 Writing 2.6 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 14.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.9 Math 2.9 20.7 Gr 6 avg.3 2.1 1.0 19. level: Reading 2.1 — E M 0.4 7 6.1 2.1 M 0.2 16.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 30.9 — 2.7 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 2.4 2.9 — F 0.1 n/a n/a 38.9 3.7 2.5 33.8 2.6 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31. level: Reading 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 13.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.8 — St Marguerite d’Youville [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 87 ESL (%): 2.5 2.7 5.7 3.5 2.1 — Math M 0.0 28.7 2. of $164.8 2.9 — 3.5 6.4 F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 1.8 2.2 M 0.3 21.8 Math 2.9 3.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.0 — 2.1 F 0.8 — 2.4 F 0.3 22. inc.0 3.8 2.7 6.0 2.9 36.2 8.1 24.5 1.8 Math 2.6 2.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 F 0.6 — Writing 2.6 — 2.8 2.2 p 3.5 2.5 — 2.8 — 3.200: 0.4 M 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 19.6 2.200: 1.7 2.6 n/a F 0.1 — 25.5 34.7 Writing 2.3 p F 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.1 6 8.5 p St Luke [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 2.9 2.5 7.7 — Writing 2.8 2.0 Gr 6 avg.8 2.4 13.3 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 M 0.7 2.2 1.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — Math 2.2 2.1 — St Paul [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 8.0 36.1 M 0.7 2.0 — 6.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 7.7 2.7 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.3 3.9 — 2.7 2.7 2.6 — Writing 2.9 2.6 — .7 3.3 1.0 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 22.1 p M 0.8 3.2 3.3 9.8 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 — Writing 2.1 Overall rank: 1357/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.8 2.7 — 2.3 p 3.2 14.2 — 2.6 2.9 3.9 Writing 2.8 2.8 — 3.4 2.6 24.9 2.9 Writing 2.8 2.3 F 0.9 2.9 2.0 2.2 q 4.0 — 2. of $132.9 — 3.6 2.8 3.1 5.4 8.3 3.8 Writing 2.8 2.4 Math F 0.7 2.3 Math F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.9 7.8 2.8 2.8 6.600: -0.1 3.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 25.2 — 7.2 3.9 3. of $88. level: Reading 2.6 3.9 2.600: 1.8 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Math 2.8 — Math 2.2 Math F 0.600: 2.8 p F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 q 8.6 p 0. of $146.8 2.0 — F 0.6 2.9 2.3 Math F 0.7 2.9 Math 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 q 2.0 3. inc.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 — St Johns [Catholic] Oakville Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.2 F 0.0 23.8 — Writing 2.7 2.7 2.9 — Math 2.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.5 2.5 3.4 E F 0.0 3.7 Tests not written (%) 2.5 F 0.0 2. of $112.9 2.8 5.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.4 25.9 3.0 2.1 3. level: Reading 2. of $99.1 p St Matthew’s [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 1.9 p Tests not written (%) 5.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 — 2.6 Writing 2.0 — F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.9 3.9 p 2.8 3.9 3.2 — 6.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 21. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.8 — 2.6 11.1 M 0.9 2.8 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 20.1 — St Timothy [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 0.0 4.4 0.9 2.8 — 2.7 2.8 — 6.2 — F 0.0 3.7 2.4 2.9 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 7.1 — 17.7 2.8 0.8 — 3.1 3.6 — St Marks [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.4 2.9 7.9 3.3 n/a F 0.9 — 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 12.9 Math 3.6 6.7 2.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 — St Peter’s [Catholic] Milton ESL (%): 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.0 — 2.5 Writing 2.6 3.3 1.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Writing 2.9 25. inc. inc.8 2.0 — 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — M 0.1 M 0.9 0.9 2.3 24.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 58/2742 73/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 3. inc.8 Math 2.6 2.9 2.9 7.5 18. inc.0 2.800: 0.9 Gr 6 avg.8 Writing 2.9 Gr 6 avg.9 2.9 22.8 2.7 34.1 M 0.3 6.7 29.0 — Writing 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 Writing 2.7 Math 2. of $87.8 2.8 Writing 3.1 F 0.0 — St Patrick [Catholic] Burlington ESL (%): 3.400: -0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 — Writing 2.6 Writing 2.1 — 2.0 3.0 3.4 0.7 — 0.7 — F 0.7 — 2.8 3.7 Writing 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 7.0 0.6 2.4 25.6 Tests not written (%) 3.9 5.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 6.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3.2 E F 0.4 7 6.8 4.0 Tests not written (%) 2.9 — 2.7 3.9 p 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 6.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 M 0.8 2.9 2.7 2.1 Math M 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.8 — Math 2.7 7.5 F 0.0 2.3 Math M 0.1 F 0.4 4.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 35 St Joan of Arc [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 4.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 6.0 4.1 Tests not written (%) 7.1 2.9 3.3 3. level: Reading 2.0 — Math 2.7 2.4 Overall rank: 438/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.7 2.7 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.9 2.0 — 2.9 Math 3.5 6.7 7. level: Reading 2.4 7.8 5.7 — 2.6 — F 0.9 — 2.7 6.8 6.7 — 4.8 2.9 2.5 — 1.8 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 n/a F 0.0 2.8 6.2 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc. level: Reading 2.2 Gr 6 avg.9 2. level: Reading 2. of $113.3 p Gr 6 avg.0 3.2 3.4 F 0.8 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.1 25.0 2.5 F 0.7 — F 0.6 2.8 Tests not written (%) 2.8 2.1 F 0.7 3.1 F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.1 3.5 Writing 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 25. inc.1 F 0.9 — 2.5 2.2 3.2 n/a 30.0 Writing 2.0 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 7.9 2.0 Gr 6 avg.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 n/a M 0.9 3.1 3.8 — 2.0 Math 3.7 2.4 20.6 2.4 Math F 0.7 2.8 2.6 — 8.7 3.1 F 0.3 1.

5 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 2.3 6.9 2.8 56.4 q Writing 2.0 — F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.5 5.2 F 0.7 Canadian Martyrs [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 26.8 2. of $322.7 — 2.7 8. inc.6 F 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 — 27.0 3.4 — 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.4 27.8 3.8 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2.7 — 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 3.2 F 0.8 2.5 F 0.6 p Writing 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.4 — 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 — Tom Thomson [Public] Burlington Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 Overall rank: 573/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 F 0.2 2. of $65.6 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.7 2.8 2.2 M 0.9 q Overall rating out of 10 7.2 0.6 — Writing 2.6 18.2 F 0.3 F 0.1 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 p Writing 2.5 7.2 F 0.7 2.9 3.9 2.5 3.2 — 2.7 — 2.7 Math 2.7 2.1 — Math F 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 5. level: Reading 2.9 6.7 — Math 2.3 11.6 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.7 23.3 4.0 Special needs (%): 23.1 p Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 28.7 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 E F 0.7 2.1 M 0.5 F 0.2 E F 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — West Oak [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 13.9 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.8 2. of $68.1 21.0 1.0 25.4 2.3 E M 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 Overall rank: 714/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.2 16.7 — Bishop Scalabrini [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 5.5 — F 0.6 2.2 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.5 0.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2612/2742 2204/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 35.6 q Math 2.8 3. level: Reading n/a 3.8 2.8 2.0 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 1.1 — 24.9 2.7 Writing 2.9 8.8 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 0.8 2.8 2.8 q Tests not written (%) 3.9 2.8 2.6 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 2.4 M 0. of $107.9 2.9 — 3.5 2.1 Special needs (%): 3.5 2.0 3.0 2.7 6.1 — 10.2 6. inc.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.1 2.5 2.8 2.3 9.9 2.7 2.3 2.5 8.4 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — 7.5 29. level: Reading 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.3 — All Saints [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 11.8 — Math 2.1 4.7 2.7 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.5 7.6 q 2.3 3.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 — Writing 2.5 2.9 2.8 27.9 — Divine Mercy [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 84 ESL (%): 7.4 F 0.1 6.6 2.6 Special needs (%): 14.9 — Writing 2.0 0.9 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 3.7 3.3 Math F 0.9 — Math 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 3.2 F 0.1 2.1 3.4 37.5 6.3 Math 2.0 4.700: 0.9 3.3 F 0.1 F 0.1 Math M 0.1 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.3 55.2 Overall rank: 360/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Writing 2.8 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.7 — Math 2.9 2.7 28. level: Reading n/a 2.3 M 0.8 4.6 — Writing 2.9 3.5 2.3 — 8.000: 1.2 — F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Gr 6 avg.7 26.0 7.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 60.7 2.4 — Math F 0.6 2.2 F 0. inc.3 n/a F 0.7 2.6 7.7 Tests not written (%) 3.1 19.3 M 0.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 91 Special needs (%): 6.7 18.6 2.3 E — M 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.0 2.8 2.6 7.0 — 6.6 2.1 p Gr 6 avg. of $119.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E M 0.6 5.9 2.4 3.8 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.8 2.2 3.9 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 8.3 E F 0. of $55.2 2.9 Math 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 13.2 8. level: Reading 2.1 3.6 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.6 Overall rank: 573/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 p Writing 2.0 3.9 2.5 — 15.4 3.3 33.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.900: 1.8 2.4 0.800: -0.6 2.8 0. of $63.6 1.600: 0.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.9 2.8 2.7 27.7 2.8 Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.7 6.0 — 3.0 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 — 4.0 — 7.6 2.1 — M 0. inc. level: Reading 2. inc.8 2. level: Reading 1.4 2.3 38.9 3.2 n/a F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Writing 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.0 2.8 2.1 5.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 F 0.7 3.9 1.1 24.8 8.4 2.5 2.1 20.8 3.9 2.8 2.700: 0.3 Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 5.3 n/a n/a F 0.8 19.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 p Math 2.8 — Writing 2.0 2.0 Writing 2.8 — Writing 2.2 E F 0.8 2.2 F 0.5 2.4 F 0.4 E E E — E M 0.8 2. of $62.1 F 0.7 6. of $92.5 F 0.1 M 0.400: -3.6 24.8 30.0 3.0 3.6 9.9 2.1 p 3.8 5.800: 1.0 0.8 2. of $83.1 F 0.1 — Math 2.1 6.9 20.2 41.0 2.7 Math 2.6 2.1 E E n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.3 Math F 0.3 F 0.1 3.0 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 F 0.9 — Tests not written (%) 5. of $57.2 Overall rank: 573/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — F 0.5 p Writing 2.3 2.8 2.4 3.8 2.6 2.0 3.8 2.1 — 1.2 F 0.6 2.8 6.2 3.8 2.5 2.7 2.1 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 4.1 — Tests below standard (%) 31.8 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 6.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 3.9 Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 2.2 n/a Math n/a 3.2 — Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 20.8 2.7 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.0 2.7 q 3.4 — Sunningdale [Public] Oakville ESL (%): 0.2 28.3 22.6 6.7 — Math 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.6 2.5 n/a F 0.8 1. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.1 Special needs (%): 10. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 n/a Math n/a 2.0 3.7 Special needs (%): 29.2 7.5 3.9 — 2.1 M 0.9 3.0 p Gr 6 avg.1 Special needs (%): 16.7 15.8 8.8 2.1 30.8 3.1 — Math 3.0 2.4 2.4 3.7 2.7 3.2 4.9 2.0 3.7 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.200: 1.6 4.2 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 18.3 2.5 3.9 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.9 2.0 3.8 — Writing 2.5 31.7 2.7 2.1 3.8 2.8 2.1 E F 0.5 32.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.5 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.5 0.5 q Overall rating out of 10 6 7.0 31.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 Tests not written (%) 0.7 — 2.1 — Corpus Christi [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 12.0 — Ange-Gabriel [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 3.0 3. level: Reading 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 38.8 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 3 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 31.3 — Math F 0.7 — 2.0 3. inc.6 2.0 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 2. level: Reading 2.2 4. inc.7 2.0 2.8 6.7 2.5 2.8 6. inc.8 2. level: Reading 2. inc.5 — Tests not written (%) 6.3 3.3 F 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 2.0 2.7 3.6 2.1 20.5 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.0 3.8 3.3 M 0.36 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 MISSISSAUGA St Vincent’s [Catholic] Oakville ESL (%): 0.6 — Math 2.1 3.8 2.0 37.7 2.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.6 2.4 Writing 2.9 7.4 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 33.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.5 2.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.2 7.9 — Tecumseh [Public] Burlington ESL (%): 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.9 5.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 28.8 2.7 1.8 6.9 2.9 3.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2.2 3.8 2.000: -2.7 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.4 0.0 1. level: Reading 3.8 2.8 — Math 3.0 2.1 7.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.9 2.7 2.9 2.1 5.1 — Math M 0.3 7.8 — Writing 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 4.9 — Tests not written (%) 7.8 2.1 F 0.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 5.9 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.6 3.2 24.3 F 0.9 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 7.8 3.0 3.400: 0. level: Reading 2.8 — Math 2.3 F 0.3 p F 0.9 3.400: 1.3 F 0.7 2.6 2.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.9 24.8 2. of $52.3 Math 2.8 2.3 E M 0.7 2.0 3.9 Writing 2.7 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.7 29.0 3.8 2.6 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.7 2.4 — 2.7 1.9 3.3 n/a 57.1 Special needs (%): 7.8 3.7 2.5 3.7 33. of $54.8 Math 3.6 2.7 2.3 — 1.0 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 3.2 2.4 7.6 2.9 2.2 29. inc.5 2.0 — 1.2 2.5 — Blessed Teresa of Calcutta [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 10.3 1.7 2.5 27.4 2.5 30.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.1 F 0.3 — Math F 0.8 2.1 38.0 3.1 — 2.9 Writing 2.0 29.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc. inc.8 2.8 2. level: Reading 2. inc.7 2.0 2.2 Gr 6 avg.0 Writing 2.3 33.4 n/a Christ The King [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 6.4 F 0.3 7.1 15.8 3.1 E E — 17.6 Gr 6 avg.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 — Math 2.8 — 3.5 Special needs (%): 10.2 7.9 — 2.0 3.9 2. inc.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 5.0 3.1 5.8 3.1 Tests not written (%) 7.8 27.8 Math 3.4 F 0.6 2.0 3.0 2.900: 1.1 3.0 33.7 2.9 2.8 — Math 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 4.2 31.2 — Cashmere Avenue [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 14.1 — Writing 3.8 — 3.6 2.7 2.7 7.6 F 0. inc. of $125.1 23.9 2.7 2.4 5.9 6 4.7 2.7 2.8 2.1 p Math 2.2 — 2. of $85.6 16.9 2.9 p Writing 2.8 2.8 Overall rank: 1038/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.0 — Writing 2.9 Math 2.9 — Writing 2.6 2.3 7.5 2. level: Reading 3.4 5.6 2.5 7.500: 0.7 2.1 Special needs (%): 11.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.2 3.5 35.4 2.0 2.9 30.0 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.8 3.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 2.4 3.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.6 2.4 — Ellengale [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 8.2 8.9 3.000: -0.0 — 2.9 7.8 — Math 2.6 2.2 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — 2.7 6 7.7 2.3 3.6 2.0 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 19.5 Math 2.4 2.7 2.0 3.8 2.1 — .1 — F 0.1 p Math 2.7 — Math 3.

1 2.1 6.8 2. inc.1 — 10.6 2.6 9.1 — 2.4 M 0.9 2.4 3.7 Math 2.8 2.5 2.7 — Floradale [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 54.1 F 0.7 2.6 2.8 — F 0.0 2.7 2.8 2.0 2.800: 0.1 F 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 — 6.0 0.9 2.9 2.3 2.8 q Overall rating out of 10 7 7.6 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.4 n/a 8.9 — 4.6 2.3 2.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 2.5 2.2 6.7 3.8 2.3 11.6 3.1 F 0.5 2.1 31.8 Overall rank: 295/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 19.3 4.6 — 2.9 2.4 3.300: -1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.9 3.8 3.7 2.1 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.8 — 2.1 2.0 2.4 3.7 Math 2.8 n/a Kenollie [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.9 3.0 3.6 2.0 n/a 2.2 2.9 q Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.6 2.2 — E M 0.5 2.6 Math 2.0 — Math 2.5 2.9 — Writing 2.9 n/a Math 3.3 — Gr 6 avg.9 — 2.5 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 6.6 — 2.4 F 0.4 n/a F 0.8 — Math 2.6 30.8 n/a Writing 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 39. level: Reading 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 13. inc.7 2.7 3.4 Gr 6 avg.9 3.2 2.0 2.6 2.3 F 0.1 7.6 n/a 3.5 2.3 8.8 — Holy Cross [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 15.6 3.7 2.0 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.8 2.7 2.9 2.1 M 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 3.2 3.3 3.6 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — F 0.4 2.2 3.6 2.6 2.8 — .0 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.6 q 2.7 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.2 — Math 2.2 32.4 29.7 6 6.3 3.3 n/a 3.9 3.1 25.7 2.9 p F 0.2 3. of $62.5 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 9.9 2. level: Reading 3.200: -0.7 6.2 F 0.3 1.0 0.7 9.9 21.5 Special needs (%): 9.1 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 p Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 11.2 1.7 3.600: -0. level: Reading 3.9 2.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 3.7 28. level: Reading 3.2 3.8 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 5.9 2.9 2.1 F 0.9 16.1 n/a 2.5 6.9 q Gr 6 avg.6 2.1 3.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 3.9 2.1 p Math 2.9 6 4.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 28.5 — Tests not written (%) 3.1 3.9 2.0 Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $40.400: -0.3 — Writing 3.3 4.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 Overall rank: 1886/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.1 — John XXIII [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 9.5 2.2 41.6 n/a Writing 3.8 0.7 5.9 2.6 2.5 9.2 n/a M 0.5 3.2 3.6 24.4 37.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 79 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.5 E n/a n/a F 0.1 14.4 M 0.0 0.4 3.4 F 0.4 3.0 3.0 24.7 5.0 3.9 3.6 2.5 q Writing 2.4 31.0 3.200: 1.9 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.2 M 0.5 Math 2.5 M 0.8 2.8 3.7 — Writing 2.0 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.5 2.3 Gr 6 avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.6 Math 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Writing 2.2 Overall rank: 1/2742 34/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 F 0.8 2.5 2.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 2.9 27.9 0.5 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 8.2 3.4 2.7 15.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.6 40.6 Writing 2.7 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — Writing 2.3 Special needs (%): 6.1 F 0.7 2.0 2.9 3. of $37.8 — 3.1 Overall rank: 396/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.7 1.8 2.2 F 0.5 10.0 0.6 24.9 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.2 Overall rank: 902/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 39.7 2.2 M 0.8 3. level: Reading 2.6 8.1 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 43.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 8.5 p Tests not written (%) 0.7 Math 2.0 3.3 1.6 26. inc.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 33.4 1.7 q Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 6.3 3.7 2.9 2.7 15.5 Forest Avenue [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 6. level: Reading n/a n/a 3.6 2.1 — Math 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.0 Tests not written (%) 9.8 3.7 n/a Gr 6 avg. of $117. level: Reading 2.1 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 Special needs (%): 13.6 — 37 Father Daniel Zanon [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 9.2 5. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.8 2.1 3.9 34.5 2.8 2.7 0.8 3. of $89.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.5 Writing 2.7 2.2 3.6 Math F 0.9 n/a 15.0 3.5 Special needs (%): 12.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 5.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 9 8.4 2.5 2.2 2.5 Math 2.0 — McBride Avenue [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 83 ESL (%): 24.8 8.8 n/a Math 3.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 9 8.5 — 2.8 2.5 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — 2. of $52.9 2.0 0. inc.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 0.5 3.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 3.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 5.5 2.2 0.7 — 2.8 2.4 Special needs (%): 18.1 Special needs (%): 4.9 7.3 2.9 3.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.9 n/a 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 17.9 p Writing 2.3 q 48.600: 1.3 F 0.0 3.5 8.9 3.4 10.5 3.3 F 0.0 2.7 2.3 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.7 — 2.2 3.8 2.5 2.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 20.8 2.5 Writing 2.9 2.6 2.1 3.2 p Math 3.0 0.4 F 0.6 2.1 — 14.8 26.6 2.0 3.9 7.1 2.3 3.6 Math F 0.9 2.3 0.8 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 5.3 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.0 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 7.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 3.2 4.9 Overall rank: 2035/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.9 3.6 Writing 2.6 — 2. inc.6 2.8 9.0 3.2 45.7 2.8 2.2 3. inc.0 3. inc.8 — Math 3. inc.5 Tests not written (%) 9.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.2 2.6 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 0.7 2.1 2.0 3.7 7.9 4.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 42.2 16.6 2.1 E E — 29.5 — F 0.6 2.6 2.2 F 0.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.3 3.0 Tests not written (%) 6.8 51. of $63.1 0. level: Reading 3.0 1.6 8.8 0.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2. of $80.3 17.2 3.4 — 4.8 3.3 F 0. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 33/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — 2.3 40.1 3.9 2.1 — Writing 3.700: 1.8 3.8 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.8 2.8 Math 2.0 3.3 n/a F 0.0 2.6 2.5 24.7 2.6 2.2 0. inc.6 2.2 32. of $91.7 Writing 2.1 n/a F 0.5 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.2 F 0.7 q Math 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.0 0.8 — 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.0 0.8 3.9 — 2.6 7.7 2.5 2.5 2.0 2. of $212.0 2.400: 2.1 — F 0.2 22.0 3.6 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.5 2.7 44.1 n/a n/a 40.3 — 4.500: 1. level: Reading n/a 3.6 2.0 — 2.1 E F 0.9 — Math 2.9 2.9 — Hawthorn [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.5 2.7 4.9 n/a ISNA Islamic [Private] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0.0 n/a 2.8 3. inc.7 4.7 2.7 2.9 15.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.7 39. of $77.0 4.7 2.0 2.0 1.1 n/a M 0.7 36.3 — Math M 0.9 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 7.6 — Tests not written (%) 9.3 2.8 — Math 2.5 2.2 2.6 5.7 2.6 — Writing 3.8 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.4 q Writing 2.4 2.5 Overall rank: 843/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Math 2.1 2.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.0 3.6 Writing 2.0 — Writing 2.4 0.500: -0.0 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 15.1 — Math 3.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 16.6 F 0.4 M 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Writing 2.2 — Lyndwood [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 7.7 2. level: Reading n/a 2.6 n/a Maple Wood [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 6.0 6.6 2.6 q Tests not written (%) 0.1 — Horizon Jeunesse [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 91.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.8 2.9 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7. inc.6 2.7 2. level: Reading 3.8 30.9 2.7 0.4 2.6 6.4 — Math 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 n/a 43.7 Tests not written (%) 5.0 14.7 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.700: 0.2 — Math 2.0 2.9 2.4 3.5 0. level: Reading 2.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 22.9 3.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 39/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 — 2. of $58.8 2.4 2.5 6.0 Special needs (%): 15.6 2.0 3.0 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 — Writing 2.8 2.300: 0.9 7.7 8.9 2.8 6.5 2.3 3.2 E n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.2 2.8 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 28.4 3.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.2 3. level: Reading 2.8 — Writing 3.1 23.0 — 5.1 8.3 34.8 Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 Hillcrest [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 114 ESL (%): 0. inc.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.0 n/a 3.8 2.3 2.9 Special needs (%): 5.7 F 0. inc. of $111.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3.8 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.8 11.0 3.5 6.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 6.3 M 0.1 — Writing 2.1 F 0.3 3.0 0.9 — 2.2 2.7 13.9 — 3.7 Gr 6 avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.8 n/a Mary Fix [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 0.0 3.2 2.0 2.4 7. inc.5 Khalsa [Private] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 0.0 3.3 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 — 2.7 7.6 26.2 p Gr 6 avg.2 — Math F 0.6 3.1 3.5 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.

inc.2 E M 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 37.8 13.0 Special needs (%): 22.9 2.8 35.4 35.9 2.9 — Math 2.7 44.7 3.1 F 0.6 2.8 2.200: 1.600: -2.9 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.9 — Writing 2.6 23.8 2.9 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.8 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 4. inc.8 3.8 — 3.4 3.2 F 0.3 8.8 2.1 E E F 0.2 — 3.1 — F 0. level: Reading 2.3 6.6 2.3 Overall rank: 2226/2742 2000/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 26.2 — Math F 0.4 — Writing 2.5 3.5 n/a n/a F 0.7 3.1 — Mineola [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 0.9 3.0 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 F 0.7 2.8 — Math 2.2 M 0.3 6.2 — Tests not written (%) 10.9 2.0 2.9 — Writing 2.3 2.2 3.5 F 0.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.8 3.8 18.8 2.8 5.1 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.2 7.5 2.7 17.9 8.6 2.2 33.7 2.7 q Gr 6 avg.2 7.5 4.6 2.7 5. inc.9 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 0.1 F 0.4 4.1 — Math 3.0 q Queen of Heaven [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 14.8 2.9 39.5 Special needs (%): 11.3 2.1 — Math F 0.1 5.2 — Writing 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.2 19.700: 0.9 2.1 E M 0.7 2.0 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 10.5 2.0 2.7 7.7 2.800: 1.8 3.6 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 11.3 36.2 M 0.1 3.2 q Tests not written (%) 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 Special needs (%): 5.3 F 0.5 3.6 F 0.000: 1.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.0 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.6 13.7 2.3 4.9 3.2 F 0.8 2.8 3.7 6 4.8 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 6.1 — Math 3.1 — 3.0 3.9 3.4 2.9 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 3.0 3.8 3.1 M 0.800: 0.7 2.8 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.4 6. of $49.7 2.600: 0.0 3.8 2.7 — Math 2.6 2.1 2.8 2.2 F 0.7 2.8 — Writing 2.7 1.0 2.5 2.3 2.0 — Writing 2.2 32.3 2.0 2.0 0.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 6.0 — Math 2.8 3.7 3.1 n/a n/a M 0.2 — Writing 3.8 2.0 31.5 1.3 3.2 — Math M 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Gr 6 avg.5 — Our Lady of Good Voyage [Catholic] MississaugaGr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 12.7 7.2 F 0.9 2.7 2.8 3.1 — Riverside [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 19.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 3.8 Writing 2.7 2.9 2.5 5.9 3.2 — Writing 2.8 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 3.6 1.0 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.7 6.8 — Oakridge [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 57.1 2.2 3.6 2.1 6 7.7 Overall rank: 964/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Math 3.2 q San Lorenzo Ruiz [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 95 ESL (%): 10. level: Reading 2.9 3.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 2.2 — 8.8 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.38 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Metropolitan Andrei [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 11.6 2.7 2.9 1.3 6.0 2.6 — Queenston Drive [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 16.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.9 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 — Writing 2.4 2.1 38. inc.7 2.4 28.1 F 0.9 2.0 1.6 8.9 34.5 29.0 3.6 2.8 2.4 F 0.9 3.1 — Math 2.0 11.9 2.1 36.700: 1.2 3.9 2.9 3.6 2.1 2.5 2.7 2. of $37.1 F 0.6 5.1 3.7 40.5 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 8.8 3.000: 1.7 2.2 M 0.4 2.5 — Math M 0.7 2.2 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.2 F 0.4 2.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24. inc.9 2.3 8.9 p Overall rating out of 10 4.4 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.9 20.1 5.8 — Math 2.6 6.7 — Math 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 7.3 E — Math F 0.0 Overall rank: 623/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3. of $61.7 — Tests not written (%) 3.8 3. inc.3 p Gr 6 avg.800: -1.1 F 0.7 2.9 2.3 2.9 Overall rank: 186/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 Overall rank: 295/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 q Writing 2.1 3.1 3.7 2.3 7.7 — Gr 6 avg. of $75.0 3. level: Reading 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.7 2.8 1.2 3.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 Special needs (%): 13.6 Overall rank: 667/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 0.1 F 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.6 2.2 17.9 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 E F 0.4 F 0. inc.2 M 0.6 1.7 — Miller’s Grove [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 3.1 4.3 — Tests below standard (%) 12.7 5.5 2.9 p Math 2.2 33.7 2.6 2.9 2.4 9.8 2.5 15.4 2.0 45.5 2.4 41.2 32.0 2.2 F 0.2 F 0.0 q Tests not written (%) 2.9 2.2 F 0.5 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 — Tests below standard (%) 26.8 — Math 2.6 2. of $63.0 36.5 3.2 3.9 38.5 14.2 F 0.2 F 0. inc.4 — René-Lamoureux [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 0.0 Special needs (%): 19.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 3.7 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 6 5. of $121.9 3.9 Special needs (%): 7.9 13. of $55.8 — Writing 2.2 3.7 0.8 12.2 n/a n/a Math F 0.2 — Overall rating out of 10 8.0 28.7 — Writing 2.5 — 0.3 6.2 2.9 — Math 2.9 2.0 2. level: Reading 3.4 3.9 — Gr 6 avg.2 0.3 F 0.9 2.5 2.2 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — 3.1 2.7 — Writing 2.8 14.7 2. level: Reading 2.6 3.7 2.1 — Math 2. of $82.2 F 0.7 2.0 3.4 7.9 2.7 2.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 3.9 2.5 2.1 8.6 Special needs (%): 10.8 — Math 2.5 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Gr 6 avg.4 0.0 29.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 8.0 2.8 2.9 4.9 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 M 0.0 3.8 31.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.6 2.8 2.8 6.6 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 1.1 3.5 2.2 2.3 7.2 0.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.2 F 0.1 26.1 F 0.0 3.0 1.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. of $86.9 51.1 3. of $103.8 2.2 3.1 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.4 2.0 26.8 3.6 2.7 2.9 2.4 Math F 0.7 q Writing 2.7 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.7 4.9 3.9 2.5 4.9 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.5 — Math 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.5 2.3 M 0.9 — Writing 2.2 8. of $73.9 q Writing 2.7 2.8 1.5 2.3 Overall rank: 714/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.7 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 7.6 2.7 2.4 3.2 3.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.1 M 0.4 — Math F 0.7 — Math 3.9 2.3 17.800: -0.8 2.6 2.3 0. level: Reading 3.6 — Math 3.4 2.1 2.3 q Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2. inc.1 M 0.5 n/a n/a Math F 0.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.0 11.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.8 2.3 3. inc.9 21. level: Reading 2.2 E E M 0.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.6 2.6 2.4 Special needs (%): 6.4 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.4 14.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 2.2 n/a n/a Math F 0.5 8.9 — Tests not written (%) 14.9 3.6 F 0.3 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.500: 1.6 — Math 2.8 — Writing 3.7 9.3 — Math 3.0 18.5 6.3 q Tests below standard (%) 32. level: Reading 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 3.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.1 — Writing 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 5.7 Math 2. level: Reading 2.6 7.6 2.5 2.8 5.0 3.9 3. level: Reading 2.7 — Writing 2.0 — 8.1 — Math 3.8 — Writing 3.5 — Writing 2.8 7.9 Math 3.0 Special needs (%): 31.5 2.2 M 0.5 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.5 F 0.9 2.3 8.0 2.0 30.3 2.8 3.9 3.4 2.8 5.1 M 0.4 F 0.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.9 3.7 3.6 3.7 9.7 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 36.1 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 15.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.5 2.1 3.9 — Math 2.1 42.2 F 0.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.5 2.9 — Plum Tree Park [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 88 ESL (%): 3.6 — Writing 2.5 2.7 Special needs (%): 3.0 3.9 0.0 3.6 2.7 2.7 — Writing 2.2 5 3. of $85.8 2.0 — Saint-Jean-Baptiste [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.7 3.9 2.100: 2.7 Special needs (%): 28.7 8.3 7.0 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.1 E F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.7 2.7 2.1 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.1 — 3.4 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.9 2.9 2.6 8.6 2.9 6.6 2.5 — Math 2.9 2.1 F 0.8 3.4 — Writing 2.4 2.3 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 21.6 2.6 1. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.9 0.8 2.4 4.3 — Plowman’s Park [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 19.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 35.0 2.5 2.0 3.8 3.8 2.1 2.7 2.8 3.3 16.8 6. level: Reading 2.3 — .1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 20. level: Reading 2.5 2.4 24.200: -1.5 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.7 q Writing 3.8 2.6 2.2 — Our Lady of Mercy [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 10.6 2.8 7.0 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — M 0.3 Overall rank: 2575/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 3.4 38.9 3.2 Overall rank: 511/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.7 2.1 2.9 2.3 M 0.2 E F 0.2 19.6 2.4 2.2 11.1 1.2 Special needs (%): 23. level: Reading 2.3 2.0 2.2 3.0 — Math 3.8 2.7 2.8 2.4 F 0.4 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.1 — Writing 3.2 Overall rank: 623/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.9 — Math 2.6 2.9 3.000: 1.3 Overall rank: 166/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 F 0.2 F 0.9 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2. of $85.8 13.4 2. of $63.2 M 0.2 F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.6 2.1 27.5 q Math M 0.9 2.0 38.1 20.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 5.1 E M 0.8 Special needs (%): 2.6 25.0 0.5 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 24.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.0 2.5 6.9 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 48. of $85.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 — Writing 2.6 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 26.8 2.3 M 0.8 2.2 3.6 3.2 23.0 2. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.7 2.2 18.7 7.0 2.9 2.5 6 7.6 5.7 — Writing 2. inc.1 F 0.5 2.9 — Math 2.4 2.9 3.4 — Math 2.5 — Ray Underhill [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 8. inc.9 3.3 — Tests below standard (%) 52.8 2.0 2.6 2.6 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.3 3.8 2.

6 2.2 3.4 32.300: 0.4 — Math M 0.8 — 4.6 2.9 2.8 32.9 2.3 25.2 M 0.1 F 0.9 2.7 — Math 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.8 Math 2.6 Math 2.7 F 0.3 F 0.1 3.6 — 2.7 2.6 2.0 p Math 2.3 — 37. level: Reading 2.7 2. of $46.5 2.8 Math 2.1 2.4 F 0.9 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 5.5 — Writing 2.8 2.5 2.3 — 45.4 Overall rank: 714/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 q Math 2.4 6.7 Math 2.2 2.7 2.6 4.0 31. inc.5 5.7 2.6 — 2.3 M 0.2 F 0.000: -0. level: Reading 2.7 — 4.9 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 39.8 q Overall rating out of 10 4.2 8.9 — 3.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Special needs (%): 17.5 3.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.4 2.4 M 0.9 3.8 — 2.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.0 2.8 2.2 26.9 2.6 5.1 3.9 — 2.4 — F 0.1 F 0.3 — 29.9 2.8 — Writing 2.8 2.4 2.1 2.6 2.8 3.4 18.3 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 p Math 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.1 — F 0.1 F 0.9 2.1 — F 0.0 2.0 2.6 0.9 — 2.9 0. of $79.7 — 3.5 E F 0.4 F 0.8 — Writing 2.9 2. inc.7 2.1 — 1. level: Reading 2.8 3.7 2.9 31.6 2.3 F 0.3 17.4 — 3.8 2.7 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.4 2.9 0.500: 1.8 2.8 2.1 3.7 2.6 2.5 — F 0.0 — 6 6.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 32.1 6.2 7.9 2.4 Tests not written (%) 3.3 F 0. inc.1 17.4 2.7 q Overall rating out of 10 6.1 F 0.1 0.6 2.9 3.2 F 0.4 F 0.1 M 0.6 17.5 2.9 40.9 Math 3.9 3.2 M 0.5 — Writing 2.100: 0.5 2.4 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.1 6.8 F 0.9 2.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 37.8 2.2 2.3 F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 F 0.6 0.9 8.1 2.3 F 0.9 2.1 6.9 3.0 — 2.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 — F 0.2 3.9 2.8 2.900: 0.0 — 6. inc.4 2.8 2.4 43.100: 1.4 2.8 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 1.8 2. of $51.6 2.1 M 0.7 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 F 0.4 1.1 — Writing 2.5 0.1 — 4.2 Overall rank: 964/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.0 — Writing 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 3.1 p Math F 0.9 6.4 F 0.2 6.7 2.4 5.0 32.1 M 0.9 2.6 2.1 M 0.8 — 2.7 Writing 2.0 — 2.7 2. of $49.8 — 5.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Math F 0.0 2.5 — E E M 0.8 4.7 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.9 3.9 2.0 3.2 F 0.7 2.5 28. inc.9 3.2 38.6 31.2 6.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.1 2.9 — Writing 2.4 22.5 2.700: 0.1 F 0.8 34.7 2.8 — Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $97.6 — Writing 2.6 2.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.1 M 0.2 — 18.3 6. level: Reading 2.7 — Sheridan Park [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 80 ESL (%): 1.8 2.7 2.7 Math 2.6 7.9 5.6 Writing 2.1 31.9 6 6.1 25.2 3.8 — Math 2.5 Writing 2.2 0.7 — 2.8 2.8 2.6 40.7 — 3.3 — Math M 0.8 2.8 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7. level: Reading 2.1 — 3.8 2.6 p Writing 2.1 F 0.6 2.7 7.0 3. level: Reading 3.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 6.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.9 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.4 6.1 M 0.7 1.0 — Math 3.7 2.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 26.3 F 0.0 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 6.2 F 0.3 — Math E F 0.6 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 Special needs (%): 12.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.8 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 — Writing 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.1 29.3 F 0.9 — 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a E F 0.4 F 0.8 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.2 F 0.0 3.8 Writing 2.6 2.8 4.5 2.6 2.1 F 0.9 2.4 2.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1991/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.9 2.6 6.5 — St Bernard of Clairvaux [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 35.1 Special needs (%): 17.7 2. level: Reading 2. inc.2 E — Math E F 0.2 Math M 0.7 2. of $36. of $65.1 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.0 3.8 — 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.2 F 0.0 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.7 3.8 — St Clare [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 29.1 p Tests below standard (%) 46.2 1.3 21.4 7.8 2.0 Tests not written (%) 2.5 Tests not written (%) 1.3 1.4 29.200: -0.6 4.7 Gr 6 avg. inc.7 2.7 2.6 1.7 2.5 31.9 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.8 3.6 2.5 2.8 3.9 — Math 2.1 — 4.7 2.9 2.3 5.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.2 p Shelter Bay [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 10.5 2.9 3.8 7.9 2.6 7.1 34.4 2.5 — 2. of $74.4 2.7 6.8 — Math 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.1 E M 0.5 2.9 3.5 7. level: Reading 2.9 7.3 2.2 Math M 0.0 4.6 3. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.6 — 2.0 — . level: Reading 2.7 43.8 Writing 2.5 27.0 p Gr 6 avg. inc.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 5.3 20.4 F 0.5 2.3 F 0.3 — E F 0.8 Math 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — 2.5 F 0.7 3.1 1.1 — Springfield [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 23.2 M 0.8 Math 2.2 F 0.400: 0.7 2.500: 2.1 5.3 2.5 2.1 3.6 2.1 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.8 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 17.3 M 0.8 2.1 3.5 25.9 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 3.2 E n/a n/a 25.2 — Tests below standard (%) 26.7 6.3 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 30.0 2.7 — Math 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 39.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Special needs (%): 7.7 3.9 3.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 8.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 6.9 2.5 7.9 3.7 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.4 2.3 Special needs (%): 5.3 F 0.8 3.7 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 24.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 Overall rank: 396/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 6.400: -0.7 2.2 1.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 26.5 F 0.7 — 2.8 2.0 32.5 2.3 2. of $76. of $66.4 6.6 1.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 2.0 Overall rank: 511/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Tests below standard (%) 31.6 2.5 n/a n/a F 0.8 5 4.1 F 0.7 2. of $71.8 — Writing 2.1 Gr 6 avg.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 F 0.8 2.6 3.6 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 2.4 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 31.1 M 0.1 — Math F 0.1 F 0.7 Writing 2.8 Special needs (%): 8.7 2.0 3.1 E p Tests below standard (%) 25.5 2.1 F 0. inc.1 F 0.7 5.7 2.8 2.5 — St Basil [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 0.7 — St Albert of Jerusalem [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 94 ESL (%): 13.7 — Math 2.6 2.1 5.7 2.3 Special needs (%): 10.2 n/a n/a F 0.3 2.1 n/a n/a M 0.4 Tests not written (%) 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 11. inc.7 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.1 F 0.6 2.9 3.3 32.2 0.6 2.5 3.7 2.2 E F 0.8 2.6 2.0 2. of $58.8 21.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.3 3.6 — Writing 2.7 27.2 0.7 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 29.0 3.2 Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 — Math 2.8 2. inc.9 — 2.6 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 F 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.2 20.7 Writing 2. inc.7 2.1 1.9 33.0 3.1 M 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.8 2.1 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 2.9 2.4 F 0.3 E M 0.6 11.8 6.9 3.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 3.5 2.8 2.3 p Tests not written (%) 4.8 — Writing 2.500: 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — Math 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 39 Sawmill Valley [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 8.9 3.9 3.6 18.9 2.0 3.0 3.7 3.5 — St Catherine of Siena [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 47.6 St Barbara [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 19.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 2.5 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.5 2.7 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.3 6.5 2.8 2.9 p Math 2.7 2.5 2.5 6.0 Special needs (%): 12.8 2.9 7 7.3 Tests not written (%) 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 8.2 6.6 2.8 3.6 2.4 q 8.9 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 — Math 2.8 n/a Settler’s Green [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 14.7 2.2 F 0.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 Overall rank: 964/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 — Tests below standard (%) 38.0 2. inc.3 14.8 3.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 32.8 2.0 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 — Math 2.6 — Writing 2.8 2.1 5.0 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 Special needs (%): 8.5 Writing 2.8 — 3.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 St Christopher [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 1.9 2.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.7 — F 0.4 Writing 2.8 2.1 M 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 4.1 n/a Math n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.1 — Math F 0.8 2.8 2.9 28.6 2.8 2.0 2.2 F 0.7 38.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 2. of $99.8 — Math 2.4 p Tests not written (%) 2.5 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 29.2 Math M 0.5 3.5 2.8 2.5 7.5 — St Charles Garnier [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 22.1 6.8 — Gr 6 avg.2 q Tests below standard (%) 22.3 0.6 2.7 18.9 — Math 2.5 — 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 17.9 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 — 3.9 2.8 2.4 0.7 Math 2.8 3.2 M 0.8 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.6 2. of $95. inc.2 F 0.8 6.1 F 0.5 7.4 — Writing 2.8 19.7 2.7 2.4 M 0.0 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.9 3.7 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 — F 0.7 2.9 5.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 St Bernadette [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 4.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 7. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.5 M 0.7 2.9 3.5 45.4 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.7 q 2.8 2.000: 1.6 2.1 27.6 0.800: 0.5 2.2 — Math M 0. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 2.0 — 2.2 5 6.2 F 0.1 8 8.6 Math 2.2 F 0.7 2.7 2.9 — St Alfred [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 28. of $108.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.1 F 0.8 — Math 2.200: 1.6 2.1 5.8 — Writing 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.6 30.

2 M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.1 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 35.6 2.5 — Writing 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 4.8 2.0 10.5 9.9 3.1 E p Tests below standard (%) 31.9 3.9 2.0 3.7 — Writing 2.8 2.8 2.0 0.3 6.800: 1.9 2.1 F 0.1 M 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.8 4.4 3.4 M 0.4 F 0.6 — 6.6 2.1 33.8 2.9 6.4 F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.1 6.1 — M 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 34.1 F 0.7 6.9 q Writing 3.1 24.1 F 0.2 F 0.6 Writing 2.3 30.8 2.7 3.7 29.9 — 2.7 2.7 3.3 n/a 16.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.0 3.2 — Math M 0.1 n/a 35.2 3.7 3.2 6.3 — St Jerome [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 4.4 6.1 2.2 2.3 M 0.8 2.1 6 7.8 — 2.2 3.0 — Writing 2.9 0.1 — Math F 0.6 Math F 0. inc.9 2.0 3.5 2.8 — Math 3.3 — 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.7 2.7 2.3 23.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 6.9 3.9 2.5 q Math M 0.8 3.5 Special needs (%): 7.4 q 7.1 3.0 — Writing 2.7 2.9 26.3 2.2 17.6 2.4 29.1 6.2 F 0.0 2.8 3.5 n/a M 0.2 3.7 2.0 — Writing 2.7 2.7 28.8 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 25.5 Writing 2.9 Tests not written (%) 3.2 8.8 2.7 2.5 3.3 2.5 2.200: 0.1 6.8 3.2 M 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 Special needs (%): 13.5 7.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 27.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 0.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 1.1 0.7 2.9 6.9 3.8 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.1 E M 0.5 2.1 Math M 0.0 2.0 2.9 2.9 3.7 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.7 — 2.0 3. of $103.5 5. level: Reading 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 p Math 2.9 3.9 2.6 6.9 2.6 2.9 18.7 2.7 3.8 2.8 3.2 E — 28. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 Math 2.6 3.9 3.3 Tests not written (%) 4.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 2.7 2.9 3.8 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 — 19.6 Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.8 8.9 25.9 16.9 — Writing 2.3 M 0.8 2.8 — Math 2.3 3.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.8 Writing 2.9 3.9 15.2 — St Gregory [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 5.9 3.6 2.600: 2.7 — F 0.8 6. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 15.7 2.0 2. of $72.9 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.8 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.0 — Math 2.9 2.7 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 F 0.0 2.1 n/a M 0.1 2.0 — 2.0 3.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 38.9 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.3 — Tests below standard (%) 30.6 2.6 7.4 5. of $96.4 2.6 4.9 — St Gertrude [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 10.5 2.9 29.1 F 0.6 6.6 2.1 26.8 2.7 2.1 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 — 2.7 3.9 3.8 2.9 Gr 6 avg.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 2.1 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 22. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 — Math 3.8 — Math 2.9 2.1 F 0.8 6. inc.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $67.0 2.4 q Math M 0.7 2.0 3.8 10.0 p Gr 6 avg.2 5.5 14.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 1.5 Gr 6 avg.8 — Writing 2.8 36.8 — Writing 3.4 — Tests not written (%) 0. of $79.500: 0.2 3.8 Overall rank: 475/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 — Gr 6 avg. inc.9 1.3 1.6 2.9 2.7 2.0 p 2.9 — Writing 2.2 E — 32.8 2.1 F 0.6 7.8 3.7 6.4 5.6 3.6 3.2 1. level: Reading 2.1 E M 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Math 2.8 — Math 2.1 2. inc.7 — Math 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 22.9 2.6 2.0 3.2 3.9 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.6 — Tests not written (%) 12.0 2.4 23.6 2.5 2.6 Special needs (%): 25.5 F 0.9 — Math 2.6 Math 2.1 2.8 2.1 3.6 — Math 2.6 1.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.2 1.3 M 0.1 3.900: 0.7 2.0 2. of $67.0 Overall rating out of 10 6. of $81.8 7.3 4.9 2.7 — Writing 3.7 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 19.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — Math 3.8 2.6 2.2 3.3 — 9.9 Overall rank: 1499/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.5 2.1 M 0.8 2.2 2.8 2.3 6. inc.6 2.1 1. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.1 Writing 2.2 3.7 29.0 2.0 3.9 — F 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 — Math 2.4 53.6 2.8 2.0 2.3 F 0.4 7.3 F 0.6 2.9 3.7 — Writing 3.2 F 0.3 1.7 — 2.700: 0.8 15.7 2.4 7.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 29.6 2.8 3.0 0.7 26.2 2. level: Reading 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 3.0 p 2.8 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6. of $113.2 2.8 2.7 — 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 31.8 2.8 — 2.7 2.2 3.6 22.5 M 0.7 7.0 3.7 2.1 3.7 — Math 2.0 24.1 — 2.8 31.1 2.8 8.3 — Tests not written (%) 4.1 2.9 — Math 2.1 21.8 3.6 6.0 3. level: Reading 2.3 Special needs (%): 7.0 1.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 11.9 2.5 2.8 2.0 3.1 3.8 3.1 Math 2.7 2.8 Gr 6 avg.5 — 2.8 Overall rank: 623/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 1.5 Math 2.4 Overall rank: 787/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 F 0.6 2.9 2.6 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.3 9.6 2.700: 0.4 q St Dunstan [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 8.9 7.4 2.9 3.8 2.9 — Writing 2. of $69.6 Tests not written (%) 5.1 M 0.1 2.6 M 0.2 6.3 F 0.4 M 0.4 Writing 2.6 27.7 25.7 Overall rank: 843/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 Overall rank: 1357/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 23.3 Overall rank: 1285/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 2.6 20.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.3 F 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 7.6 2.6 — Writing 2.8 — Math 2.9 3.9 2.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 39.8 — 2.1 18.0 2.1 Overall rank: 295/2742 177/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Math F 0.1 3.0 1.0 3.9 2.5 7.6 5.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 9.8 2.8 2.1 n/a F 0.0 2.1 8.6 Special needs (%): 9.7 3.3 E F 0.9 3.5 — Writing 2.9 Writing 3.7 — 2.4 F 0.8 2.5 — M 0.1 7.2 F 0.700: 0.9 2. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 — .9 3.9 Math 3. inc.5 1.1 33. inc.3 Overall rank: 1215/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.2 p Gr 6 avg.1 2.3 — St Gerard [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 10.1 3.6 — E F 0.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 — St Edith Stein [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 12.9 3.1 M 0.6 2.6 2.9 q 1. inc.7 Gr 6 avg. of $90.8 0.1 n/a M 0.5 6.8 3.2 M 0.5 F 0.1 — St Elizabeth Seton [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 7.7 2.3 F 0.9 3.1 Gr 6 avg.4 — 0.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5. of $87.2 8.6 n/a n/a F 0.8 q Overall rating out of 10 7.3 Special needs (%): 32.1 q Gr 6 avg.1 — St Dominic [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 14.800: -0. inc. inc.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.8 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.9 — Math 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 6.6 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 26.8 2.9 — 2.0 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.3 5. of $101.1 3.8 2.7 — 2.9 3.0 3.9 8 6.0 — 3. of $55.2 F 0.6 Math 2.7 2.0 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.2 F 0.9 3.6 3.5 2.6 7.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.2 — St Faustina [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 6.4 24.8 2.1 M 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.2 24. level: Reading 2.700: 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 n/a n/a Math E M 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.4 4.3 25.2 n/a Math F 0.4 — Tests below standard (%) 30.7 2.2 E F 0.9 2.9 2.9 2.6 7.8 2. inc.9 2.2 n/a F 0.3 1.8 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.6 Overall rank: 261/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 21.9 3.3 M 0. of $60.4 17.0 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 — F 0.7 F 0.9 3.0 Special needs (%): 10.7 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.9 Math 3.7 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.5 2.1 F 0.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.8 — Math 3.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.3 7.3 M 0.8 2.7 2.3 M 0.7 — Writing 2.000: 1.2 F 0.8 2.5 F 0.9 2.1 6.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.7 q Math 2.3 8 8.6 3.9 2.7 30.8 2.9 2.4 — Writing 3.0 3.8 2.8 2.9 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.3 — 6.2 Tests below standard (%) 27.7 q F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 11.7 2.0 2.1 26.1 F 0.1 E M 0.4 M 0.0 — 7.6 2.8 1.1 F 0.9 2.5 0.0 1.2 3.6 2.9 6.5 7. of $112.9 20.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 3.9 2.5 F 0.5 2.9 3.8 — 2.8 Math 2.7 2.40 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St David of Wales [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 2.2 M 0.8 2.0 — St Herbert [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 1.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.9 2.0 2.3 Special needs (%): 12.9 — St Helen [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 10.7 26.8 — Writing 2.3 F 0.7 Tests not written (%) 2.0 2.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 21.1 n/a F 0.5 2.3 4.1 M 0.0 3.9 — Writing 2.0 — Writing 2.4 23.6 2.9 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.2 3.9 7.2 Overall rating out of 10 6. level: Reading 2.7 — St Edmund [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 5.6 2.6 2.0 3.6 q 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 0.8 2.2 — Math F 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.9 2.0 3.0 — Math 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.3 F 0.8 3.9 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.2 M 0.7 2.9 2.8 2.9 7.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.300: -0.6 2.7 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.1 — St Hilary [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 M 0.6 2.1 — 2. level: Reading 3.6 — M 0.6 2.9 2.7 2.1 5.9 — 2.7 2.0 3.9 2.1 M 0. inc.8 3.0 2.8 2.100: 0.1 3.5 44.9 — 2.7 2.9 8.8 2. level: Reading 2.7 Special needs (%): 14.2 2.7 6.400: -0.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.1 M 0.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 17.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.8 — 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 6.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 M 0. inc.9 2.8 — 5 3.1 F 0.6 — St Francis of Assisi [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 13.0 3.7 2. level: Reading 3.800: 0.8 q Tests not written (%) 2.0 — Math 2.8 2.4 17.1 M 0.6 — 2.8 2.6 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.6 9.7 Math 2.5 20.6 8.1 2.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 p Math F 0.8 2.5 2.7 — 2.9 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 42.

8 2.0 18.2 2.6 2.0 3.3 7.6 2.8 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.7 — 2.7 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.3 Gr 6 avg.7 5.7 7.6 2.5 n/a 29.7 — 2.4 2.9 2.1 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 7.9 — 1.9 2.0 — Writing 2.6 0.7 2.5 Math F 0.6 2.4 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 25.7 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 Overall rank: 623/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.8 35.5 q Math 2.0 — 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 2.4 34.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a F 0.9 21.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 4.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.8 q .5 7.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.3 2.0 Writing 3.6 — Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 14.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.5 2.1 F 0.8 6.3 — F 0. inc.7 q 6 6.2 4.9 — 2.4 F 0.2 M 0.2 6.8 2.7 2.1 3.6 2. of $61.8 2.3 26.5 — 3.1 0.6 2.0 — 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.0 — St Mark [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 5.1 — 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 q Math M 0.1 7.9 2.8 3.9 — 2.2 0.2 1.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Special needs (%): 14.1 M 0.6 2.7 Tests not written (%) 0.1 6 5.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 p F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.0 3.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 66.8 2.6 — Math 2.7 3.5 2.9 2.1 M 0.0 3.4 32.9 — 2.7 2.8 Math 2.3 32.5 2. level: Reading 2.500: 2.7 2.1 7 6.9 p Math 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 5. of $63.9 St Sebastian [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 15.9 2.8 2.8 0.2 n/a F 0.9 2.6 q 2.7 6 6.2 F 0.8 2.1 F 0.8 — 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.9 2.7 2.3 1.0 2.9 — 2.0 — 2.1 — Math E E M 0.6 27.6 Writing 2.1 F 0.3 — E F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 3.0 — 2.7 Writing 2. inc.6 2.600: 1.8 2.9 2.8 — Math 3.2 28.3 F 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 14.2 5.8 31.8 4.6 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 Math 2.5 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 42.2 Special needs (%): 7.8 5.1 2.5 2.8 2.2 F 0.7 2.9 2.0 4.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — Writing 2.4 20. of $58.6 — Writing 3.0 Writing 2.5 5.2 27.1 7. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 7 6. of $73.1 — 26.8 3.0 — 2.2 F 0.1 F 0.5 Gr 6 avg.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 7.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — 0.2 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.7 2.2 n/a F 0.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 4.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Tests not written (%) 1.8 p 2.7 23.4 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 45.9 2.0 0.9 2.7 Gr 6 avg.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.8 3.9 Special needs (%): 13.6 — 2. of $110. inc.0 3.5 Special needs (%): 16.3 E F 0.3 34.6 2.9 0.0 3.8 3.8 3.1 — 2.2 Special needs (%): 15.3 1.4 — 6.9 7.9 3.8 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.9 2.9 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.4 2.8 5.1 38.3 22.8 2.6 2.6 5.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 5. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.3 F 0.9 2.3 5.8 2.5 Tests not written (%) 5. level: Reading 2.1 2.8 2.7 2.8 — 2.2 Math F 0.5 Math 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.1 F 0.7 2.7 2.8 Writing 2.5 2.1 M 0.9 42.1 — M 0. inc.9 2.7 2.0 0.7 2.7 Writing 2.7 Math 2.000: 0. level: Reading 2.3 Special needs (%): 23.6 Writing 2.3 F 0.5 35.8 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.8 43.6 Math M 0.0 2.9 — Math 2.6 2.5 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 5.5 2.8 — F 0.6 — Writing 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0. inc.2 2.8 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.6 1.4 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 29.4 2.9 2.7 — St Luke [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 5.1 M 0.7 2.2 Overall rank: 2146/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 — Writing 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 7.3 45.6 2.5 n/a Math M 0.3 7.000: 0.1 M 0.0 2.6 2.2 — M 0.2 5 4.8 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2. of $59.5 2.6 — 2.3 F 0.4 33. level: Reading 2.6 2. inc.6 2.9 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a 30.8 3.3 0.6 Writing 2.9 — Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 34.200: -1.9 — St Richard [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 9.7 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 — Math 2.8 2.5 34.7 3.3 F 0.6 3.6 q Writing 3.8 — Math 3.7 2.1 — St Raphael [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 19.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 14.0 3.4 0.0 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3.1 28.4 2.4 F 0.9 Math 2.0 — St Matthew [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 43.0 2.2 31.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 F 0.5 2.7 2.3 2.7 Writing 2.5 2.5 1.8 0.0 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.7 — Writing 2.8 2.9 23.6 — Writing 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.4 — 4.2 M 0.9 2.5 — Writing 2.0 2.2 49.6 1. inc.8 — F 0.5 2.1 F 0.7 7.3 — St Jude [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 5. level: Reading 2.3 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 — Writing 2.2 Tests not written (%) 1.8 2.8 Math 2.7 18.3 2.5 4.7 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 q 2.0 2.5 Special needs (%): 12.9 2. of $85.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.9 3.700: 1.200: -0.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 4.0 10.1 Overall rank: 2262/2742 2083/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 22.1 2.5 3.6 St Philip [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 5.7 Writing 2.8 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 41 St John of the Cross [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.7 8.6 Gr 6 avg.5 Tests below standard (%) 26.8 2.7 St Raymond [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 18.4 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 15.1 F 0.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.5 q St Joseph [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 2.2 — St Pio of Pietrelcina [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 9.6 q 2.1 E F 0.9 3.1 F 0.1 Overall rank: 360/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 24.0 2.4 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 2.4 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.8 2.0 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.3 25.7 2.9 20.7 2.5 2.9 2.0 4.5 2.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 33. of $187.8 2.5 4.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.1 F 0.3 — 7.4 5.0 — Gr 6 avg.3 q Tests below standard (%) 26.5 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.8 2.5 37. level: Reading 2.9 2.7 2.6 1.6 2.7 2.8 — Math 2. of $87.8 2.2 F 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.6 2.9 24.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.400: -1.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.1 — 2.8 Writing 2.4 9.4 2.6 F 0.0 3.7 34.1 F 0.7 6.3 n/a F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 31.6 1.600: 1.3 — St Louis [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 13.1 3.3 Overall rank: 714/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.8 2.0 1.2 — 7.3 F 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.0 3.8 2.1 3. inc.4 2.0 1.8 34.2 F 0.7 — 2.1 — Math 2.0 2.2 — 21.2 n/a E n/a E F 0.5 5.8 — Math 2.6 2.7 2.7 Writing 2.2 21.4 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 1.9 — 3.2 n/a M 0.8 3. level: Reading 2.2 0.5 2.6 2. inc. inc.0 — Writing 2.7 2.8 36.7 2. of $71. inc.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 2.3 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Math 2.3 24.7 Writing 2.2 E F 0. inc.5 3.1 n/a F 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.1 3.8 — 2.7 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.9 6.4 2. level: Reading 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.7 — 2. inc.1 2.5 20.4 2.9 2.9 — Math 2.0 2.6 — Writing 2.4 2.8 45.8 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 11.300: -1.0 2.1 — 2.8 Gr 6 avg.5 2.8 2.8 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 3.1 E F 0. level: Reading 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 23.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — Tests below standard (%) 20.8 2.8 Math 2.1 19.4 3.0 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 M 0.4 30.7 Math 2.8 4.9 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 3.9 1.7 — Math 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 q F 0.2 Math M 0.7 2.6 2.7 6.2 3.6 3.7 — Gr 6 avg. of $68.8 — 2.2 E E p 26.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 — Writing 2.5 2.4 3.700: -1.9 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8 7.2 2.9 2.4 — 7.3 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.0 2.7 — Writing 2.7 2.1 M 0.9 — 2.9 3.6 2.9 Gr 6 avg.3 44. of $61.7 2.9 p 2.3 F 0.7 — F 0.9 4.2 7.8 — Math 3.7 3.7 3.5 2.5 3.3 F 0. inc. inc. of $40.6 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 — Writing 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 1.4 Math F 0.7 — St Julia [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 4.6 2.7 Math 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.2 3.8 — 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 22.1 — 25.7 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 Math 2.5 2.0 2.4 2.9 8.7 3.7 Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.8 Overall rank: 964/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.1 37.5 2. of $67.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.8 2.0 2.8 — 6.2 Tests not written (%) 10.2 6.6 — E F 0.7 3.1 2.6 2.7 2.3 — St Margaret of Scotland [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 12.4 — Math 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.0 3.7 2.0 3.5 7.6 14.8 2.8 2.6 2.9 3.2 E — 36.4 Overall rank: 964/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 6.5 — 6.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0. level: Reading 2.4 — F 0.7 2.5 — F 0.4 4.3 F 0.5 2.8 38.8 2.1 2.5 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 5.0 2.8 1.1 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.5 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.1 F 0.2 E F 0.2 Math M 0.3 8.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.800: 0.9 2.4 Writing 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 33.7 q 2.6 q Gr 6 avg.7 2.8 2.7 Special needs (%): 6.4 2.9 2.4 2.8 5.6 3.7 2.700: 1.4 — 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 1.7 5.5 2.5 31.2 F 0.8 q 1.3 n/a n/a Math F 0.6 4. level: Reading 3.6 38.3 2.6 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2. of $94.9 2.8 — 2.2 M 0.1 — Math 2.800: 1.8 2.2 — Math E F 0.8 — 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 18.0 3.0 0.6 2.9 2.9 3.3 12.9 Math 2.4 23.1 2.7 2.000: -1.8 Math 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.8 4.6 2.1 3.0 32.7 2.8 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 23.0 Math 3.

8 7.2 3.8 2.1 n/a 2.0 3.9 2.7 8.2 2.9 7.1 3.4 F 0.0 14.8 2.1 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 Overall rank: 186/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — Sts Martha & Mary [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 5.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.0 3.7 2.8 2.6 2.1 3.2 6.8 3.8 2.2 3.2 7.7 38. of $68.3 — 26.6 2.9 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 4.1 2. inc.5 — St Thomas More [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 88 ESL (%): 5.0 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7.7 8.8 2.9 3.2 M 0.3 3.1 — 29.0 3.0 11.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 39.6 2.8 35.0 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6 6.3 2.1 3.9 2.2 E M 0.8 0.7 — 0.5 24.2 3.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 3.6 0.6 — Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8 8.1 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 4.1 F 0.9 2.1 7.5 3.5 F 0.0 3.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.0 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.8 3. level: Reading 2.9 3.7 2.6 24.2 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.2 — Math F 0.0 3.3 2.7 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.3 3.3 Special needs (%): 8.1 Writing 2.700: 2.8 — Writing 3.4 5.2 F 0.0 3.9 q Writing 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 15.8 23.4 2.1 n/a n/a 41.6 2.5 — St Vincent de Paul [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 8.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.7 5.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 17.2 27.0 2.6 0.8 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.9 2.9 — Writing 2.3 — E M 0.9 3.4 3. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 — St Sofia [Catholic] Mississauga ESL (%): 29.9 2.2 8.7 2.5 4.3 — 2.1 6. of $93.8 2.0 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.6 p Writing 2.3 n/a 2.5 27. level: Reading 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.7 2.2 E — Math F 0.800: 2.3 — 3.6 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 F 0.8 2.000: 1.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 0.6 2.2 F 0.0 p Math 2. level: Reading 2.8 43. of $234.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 24.8 2.6 — Writing 2.2 3.2 F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 10.0 n/a Math 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — Writing 2.5 Writing 2.4 Math 2.8 1.0 2.0 n/a PEEL AREA Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 16.6 — Writing 2.4 — Math M 0. level: Reading 2.0 — Math 2.9 3.7 2.8 7.9 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 38.4 F 0.2 F 0.5 Gr 6 avg.1 M 0.9 3.9 1.0 3.9 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.8 2.5 1.8 n/a Writing 2.42 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Simon Stock [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 5. of $68.1 E E M 0.2 F 0.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 19.8 0.8 17.8 n/a 2.3 8.7 2.0 3.700: 0.9 2.1 7.9 3. inc.9 3.8 3.9 St Timothy [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 9.0 2.3 9.8 23.3 19.5 2.3 F 0.0 2.9 2.1 3.7 0. inc.1 F 0.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.1 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 p Math 2.7 2.7 — 2.7 3.4 7.1 — F 0.5 9.0 43.2 F 0.7 3.0 2.5 2.2 3.7 3.5 2.0 3.2 M 0. inc.2 4.5 2.8 2.9 q Math 3.2 F 0.5 3.5 22.2 F 0.6 2.5 2. of $58.9 — Tests not written (%) 1. inc.7 2.6 30.3 3.3 Overall rank: 1357/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 Overall rank: 78/2742 34/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — Writing 2.0 2.3 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 — Math 3.400: -2.4 2.0 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 0.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 7.3 E E p Math F 0.1 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 3.8 5.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.7 3.0 0.7 30.7 2.1 n/a Writing 2.2 7.1 Special needs (%): 9.1 3.5 2.7 E F 0.2 M 0.2 3.9 14.9 3.8 2.6 8 n/a 5.5 Special needs (%): 9.8 2.0 1. level: Reading 2.9 3.9 3.9 2.9 7.800: 1.8 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 n/a 3.1 — Writing 3.7 19.0 2.4 2.2 F 0.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 21.9 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 9.1 24.8 14.7 2.0 2.8 n/a Math 2.100: -0.5 33.7 2.4 Special needs (%): 23.9 — 1.8 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 101 Special needs (%): 13.8 2.7 2. inc.3 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.6 9.9 Math 2.6 2.2 Math M 0.2 E E p Tests below standard (%) 32.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 3.5 n/a Belfountain [Public] Belfountain Gr 6 enrollment: 17 ESL (%): 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 16.0 3.1 3.0 3.8 Gr 6 avg.5 — St Therese of the Child Jesus [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 110 ESL (%): 6.7 2.1 Special needs (%): 12.7 3.5 2.0 2.6 2.9 — 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.700: 0.3 Overall rank: 186/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.1 3.6 q Math 2.9 2. inc.2 5.8 2.0 13.6 3.7 Math 2.5 2.0 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 3.9 — Math 2.0 3.8 2.5 — 2.7 2.6 2.5 6.6 10.1 F 0.2 Writing 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.9 2.3 4.9 2.5 F 0. of $48.1 2.4 2.4 F 0.1 2.4 3.6 Special needs (%): 6.6 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 330/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 p Thorn Lodge [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 70 ESL (%): 10.2 F 0.9 3.2 3.7 — 0.9 2.3 M 0.7 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 8 8.5 2.8 2.2 F 0.5 25.2 — Tecumseh [Public] Mississauga ESL (%): 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.9 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 3.7 2.6 3.6 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Special needs (%): 9.100: -0.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 q Writing 3.1 3.0 0.6 2.5 — Math E F 0. of $93.8 2.2 3.1 q Writing 3.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 0.5 2.6 13.2 19.7 3.1 F 0.4 Special needs (%): 7.9 15.0 4.7 1.6 33.6 0.4 5.2 — Tests not written (%) 7.0 — Writing 3.9 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.2 F 0.7 3.1 2.0 3.1 E F 0.0 1.8 — Math 2.1 3.2 3.7 3.9 — 2.8 24.9 3.1 F 0.2 18.4 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.1 Overall rank: 186/2742 34/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 5.3 F 0.7 2.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 3.9 4.1 7. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 3.4 2.2 F 0.3 — Math M 0.2 3.1 F 0.5 2.4 F 0.0 2.8 2.2 E F 0.2 E E F 0.0 1.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 7.4 3.3 0.2 8.4 — 2.0 n/a 37.8 2.2 F 0.7 2.4 F 0.8 — Tests not written (%) 4.5 1.2 F 0.0 3.1 F 0.0 35.3 — Math M 0.9 6.0 — Gr 6 avg.7 3.0 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.8 2.5 0.8 5.2 M 0.9 Overall rank: 360/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3. of $57.7 — 2.5 — 5.9 3.1 17.6 2. level: Reading 3.1 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Math E E M 0.4 2.1 2.9 3.9 Tests not written (%) 1.1 — 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.8 3.0 p Math 2.0 0.7 2.9 7.3 1.2 0.6 2.4 3.3 n/a F 0.1 — Math 3.7 Math 2.9 2.0 7.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 46.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.5 2.5 0.5 Writing 2.7 Overall rank: 573/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.2 n/a n/a E F 0. level: Reading 2. inc.3 F 0.6 8.6 24.3 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Special needs (%): 23.0 3.8 — Math 2.4 3.6 3.9 3.9 p Writing 2.9 2.7 14.1 — Alloa [Public] Caledon ESL (%): 0.0 3.0 2.9 12.9 2.6 3.6 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 p Tests not written (%) 1.9 21.1 F 0.3 3.4 4.9 3.1 3.4 — Tests below standard (%) 45.0 2.6 3.8 n/a 2.9 — Math 2.1 — 2.2 9.0 5.7 — Math 2.0 2.8 2.5 6 4.5 — F 0. of $61.0 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.7 — Math 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.8 2.6 Writing 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.1 — St Valentine [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 15.8 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 F 0.3 F 0.6 — Math 2. inc.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.2 8.3 F 0.0 n/a 2.300: 1.1 E E M 0.8 — Sts Peter & Paul [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 14.9 q 2.1 — Writing 2.3 39.8 Writing 2.700: 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.1 — Writing 3.5 33.1 — Math 3.7 2.4 q Tests below standard (%) 46.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.9 2.0 2.4 7.2 3. inc.8 — 2.7 2.2 7 5.3 — 6. level: Reading 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 16.0 3. of $62.9 n/a 2.2 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.2 F 0. level: Reading 3.1 8.2 — Tests not written (%) 0. of $83.2 F 0.7 Special needs (%): 5.1 — Tests below standard (%) 9. of $70.9 2.2 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 2.0 2.6 2.3 7.1 3.6 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.6 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.6 — Vista Heights [Public] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 103 ESL (%): 14.2 6. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 — Writing 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2. inc.0 2.5 p St Veronica [Catholic] Mississauga Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 6.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 7 7.4 F 0.1 F 0. inc.8 3.6 — 2.9 16.7 n/a n/a Math n/a E n/a F 0.3 8.0 Tests not written (%) 1.4 2.5 Special needs (%): 9.5 — Overall rating out of 10 9.3 F 0.6 3.0 18.5 2.2 F 0.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.8 2.4 — Math F 0.8 2.2 — Math 3.0 p Writing 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 5. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 19.7 — 6.8 2. of $93.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Writing 2.8 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.8 — Writing 3.7 2. inc.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 1.1 — Math 2.9 9.8 2.1 4.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 — Math 2.0 3.700: -2.0 3.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.2 8.9 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 F 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.2 E F 0.1 1. of $85.9 — 2.7 — F 0.6 2.7 2.6 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 3.7 Tests not written (%) 1.5 F 0.1 3.9 — F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.000: 2.1 30.6 2.000: 2.6 2.6 q Gr 6 avg.3 6. inc.7 2.0 1.8 6.0 3.1 F 0.0 — 2.9 2.0 3.8 4.6 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — Math 2.3 — .2 E F 0.8 42.

9 — Tests not written (%) 9.7 — Math 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 20.1 Overall rank: 902/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — 39.8 2. inc.5 2.2 E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.9 2.8 3.7 — 3.7 2.6 2.1 n/a F 0.5 2.9 2.8 — Math 2.2 — F 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.0 2.1 M 0.5 5.2 8.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.3 41.9 — Writing 2.5 4.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 35.8 2.1 F 0.2 21. level: Reading 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 6. of $62.7 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.1 2.6 q Math 2.6 2.1 E F 0.4 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.7 3.6 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.2 2.6 47.7 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 0.5 2.2 — .6 2.3 n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2.5 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 p Math 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.4 3.6 2.2 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — 25.4 4.2 2.7 n/a Math n/a 3.6 2.3 2.4 F 0.6 — Math 3.6 — 2.6 2.8 2.0 25.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 2.6 5.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 n/a Father Francis McSpiritt [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 6.3 35.6 34. inc.5 Special needs (%): 9.9 Overall rank: 2122/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 7 5.8 2.2 2.7 2.3 1.6 2.4 F 0. of $62.8 3.7 — Math 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 43 Bishop Francis Allen [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 11.4 2.6 43.3 E F 0.9 2.2 4.0 0.6 F 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.200: 0. inc.7 5. level: Reading 2.6 — 6.1 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 E F 0.400: -0.300: 0.9 6.2 3.7 2.1 — Math E E E E F 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 38.6 2.9 33.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.1 20.2 2.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — Math 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.3 F 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.9 2.5 2.7 2.1 M 0.6 q 2.0 0. level: Reading 2.7 Overall rank: 2342/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.7 Special needs (%): 19.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 2.7 2.4 — Caledon East [Public] Caledon East Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.0 — Math 2.9 Special needs (%): 12.1 M 0.5 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 58.7 2. inc.6 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 2.5 6 6. level: Reading 2.7 3.0 2.5 2.6 q Writing 2.8 Math 2.8 — 2.7 2.7 n/a M 0.1 E F 0.7 2.3 M 0.2 3.5 2.6 3.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 7.6 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.2 Overall rank: 1215/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 — Carrefour des Jeunes [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 20.8 2.6 2.7 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 n/a n/a Math F 0.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.4 2. level: Reading 2.4 — Father Michael McGivney [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 61 ESL (%): 11. of $56.3 2.2 5.3 Overall rank: 1499/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.3 1.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 25.8 Special needs (%): 4.5 41.6 2.7 2.5 Special needs (%): 16.0 n/a Caledon Central [Public] Caledon Village Gr 6 enrollment: 70 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 2.9 3.9 2.9 Gr 6 avg.8 5.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.1 2.6 — Writing 2.8 — Math 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.6 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.5 2. inc.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6 9.3 2.7 2.3 2. inc.1 37.1 2.6 2.6 2. inc.0 1.5 6.4 5.8 4.4 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 48.8 0.5 2.3 5.7 — Writing 2.5 — Georges Vanier [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 9.2 3.4 F 0.2 — M 0.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.5 48.7 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 47.8 — 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.1 — Math M 0. of $51.8 2.8 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 3.7 2.5 2.8 — Writing 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.100: -0.8 3.1 p Overall rating out of 10 8 7.8 n/a E M 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 35.3 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 12.5 2. inc.8 2.6 1. level: Reading 2.7 5.1 2.5 2.4 8 6.0 Special needs (%): 12.8 2.6 6.9 2.6 2.8 6. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.6 2.4 3.6 2.4 E F 0.4 F 0.1 F 0.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.7 — Writing 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 32.9 6 4.1 F 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 36.5 Writing 2.8 2.6 — Writing 2.5 2. inc.4 Math 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.1 — Writing 2.7 — Math 2.1 30.8 2.5 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 2.8 — Math 2.1 40.8 — 2.8 2.7 q Gr 6 avg.4 Special needs (%): 22.400: -1.1 2.4 2.6 0.1 M 0.2 — Math M 0.2 2.2 2.8 — 2.5 2.0 23.6 2.4 0.4 11.0 45.0 32.7 2.9 2.8 6.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 9.1 2.5 Writing 2.4 4.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 Writing 2.5 — Great Lakes [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 111 ESL (%): 5.800: -0.6 2.5 2.2 34.8 3.7 2.2 2. inc.8 — F 0.8 5.3 2.9 35.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.9 Special needs (%): 15.5 2.4 2.8 2.4 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2075/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 2.7 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.6 1.3 2.7 2.0 3.9 5.6 2.1 2.2 5.2 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.4 2.6 5.8 — Writing 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.3 — 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.5 M 0.7 3.9 2.6 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.9 E M 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 45.6 2.5 2. of $58.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 29. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. of $70.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.1 F 0.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 4.0 2.7 2.7 2.0 31.8 4.8 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.1 M 0.6 1.7 2.5 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.7 n/a Father Clair Tipping [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 71 ESL (%): 4.4 4.3 3.3 F 0.5 2.2 2.7 2.3 2.4 31.0 4.1 M 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 F 0.5 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.2 — Cardinal Newman [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 7.9 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6.5 2.7 33.2 2. of $119.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 Special needs (%): 12.5 — Writing 2.5 Writing 2.7 Overall rank: 1156/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.2 — 2.8 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.5 Tests not written (%) 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 39.3 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.5 F 0.6 2. inc.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 5.7 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Math 2.7 F 0.5 2.8 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.1 2.2 F 0.7 2.8 6.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.7 — Writing 2.300: 0.1 3.2 F 0.9 2.8 11.1 8.6 2.1 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.4 2.7 0.5 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 2.7 3.4 3.0 2.4 — Writing 2.000: -0.7 32.7 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 32.1 E M 0.8 2.6 2.1 31.9 Special needs (%): 11.3 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.0 0.3 — Math F 0.4 2.8 2.2 2.8 2.7 2.0 2.3 F 0.1 33.4 2.7 10.6 2.7 2.1 M 0.6 2.7 — Writing 2.1 47.3 n/a Esker Lake [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 2.6 F 0.1 M 0.5 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 113 Special needs (%): 9.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 3.1 — 6.6 — Math 2.2 2.5 — Writing 2.1 F 0.2 n/a F 0.7 2.9 6.1 — Tests below standard (%) 37.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 47.8 2.1 p Math F 0. level: Reading n/a 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 2. of $98.6 3.4 36.2 2.7 2.8 n/a Math n/a M 0.7 2.3 47.5 3.2 35.9 — Math 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 5.200: -0.5 2.1 Overall rank: 2122/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.4 Special needs (%): 9.6 — 2.5 30.9 2.3 6.3 4.2 F 0.3 5. level: Reading n/a 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. of $61.4 2.5 2.7 2.7 5.1 F 0. of $53.8 2.5 — 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.6 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 E E E F 0.9 Special needs (%): 3.0 2.5 2.8 — Writing 2.2 Math M 0.0 2.1 8.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 2.6 — Math 2.9 50.1 4. of $62.2 F 0.6 — Castlemore [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 148 ESL (%): 14.1 F 0. of $48.2 F 0.8 29. of $65. inc.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 37.6 F 0.8 34.7 — Math 3. of $54.7 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 4 6.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.8 31.6 2.8 2.8 — Conestoga [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 19.9 28.5 5.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 6.9 45.7 29.1 37.7 — Math 2.8 2.6 q Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.2 4.1 F 0.0 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.7 2.9 2.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 Tests not written (%) 3.9 — Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.5 2.7 2.2 Special needs (%): 5.7 2.1 F 0.4 34.4 2.7 2.7 4.1 2.2 M 0.7 — F 0.7 2.7 — Good Shepherd [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 76 ESL (%): 7.8 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 — Writing 2.200: -1.7 4.3 2.6 3.1 5.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 1.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.400: 0.900: -0.9 — Father C W Sullivan [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 21.1 F 0.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.9 2.7 5. level: Reading 2.7 — Writing 2.4 5.8 2.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 3.7 2.3 2.5 Gr 6 avg.1 36.7 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 M 0.5 2.0 2.500: -0.7 — 5.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.000: 0.2 1.6 — Math 2.1 M 0.5 2.1 M 0.9 — Math 2.1 E F 0.3 3.4 E — Tests below standard (%) 33.8 6.2 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.

4 5.8 2.4 F 0.6 n/a 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — 3.6 2. of $64.2 F 0.0 2.5 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 2.3 Writing 2.3 19.3 26.0 n/a 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 p 3.1 7.7 2.9 3.0 2.8 n/a 2.6 3.6 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.7 41.9 2.6 2.0 0.4 — Writing 2.5 2.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 56.8 2.2 19.9 2.7 2.8 n/a F 0.8 3.0 26. of $67.4 34.5 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.0 Gr 6 avg.3 4.5 2.7 2.1 E M 0.8 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.2 F 0.5 46.1 2.6 2.8 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — Gr 6 avg.8 — Math 2.7 2.9 2.4 E n/a F 0.4 2. of $61.7 7.3 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.3 F 0.8 2. inc.6 — Writing 2.3 — Writing 2.0 2.9 4.1 4.0 Writing 3.6 2.4 33.9 2. inc.6 Special needs (%): 7.9 3.8 — Math 2.8 4.6 n/a 2.7 2.6 2.3 Math F 0. inc.2 — Tests below standard (%) 36.5 Special needs (%): 7.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.6 2.8 — 2.1 F 0.8 5 6.5 E E M 0.8 5.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 M 0.0 n/a 6.8 — F 0.5 n/a 2.7 2.6 n/a 2.3 2.0 0.1 n/a Our Lady of Fatima [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 16.4 F 0.600: -0.0 — 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.0 0.6 2.7 2.5 40.3 n/a 5.1 2.0 5.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 12.1 F 0.2 2.3 F 0.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.4 2.1 F 0.300: -1.6 Writing 2.8 2.4 35.6 2.2 43.4 0.6 — 1.1 F 0.6 2.8 2.0 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.5 2.7 2.8 Special needs (%): 6.2 26. level: Reading 2.1 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.8 2.8 — Writing 2.8 2.3 F 0.8 2.3 6 4. level: Reading 3.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.4 22.0 2.2 4.9 2.8 2.6 Math 2.5 — Math 2.3 25.8 n/a 3. level: Reading 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.6 0.4 2.600: -1. level: Reading 2.1 — 6.7 — Math 2.7 n/a 2.9 2.8 — 2.8 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 27.1 5.7 — Math 2.2 n/a F 0.7 0.5 2.0 1.1 — 8.6 2.6 29.9 — 2.8 2.5 30.7 2.1 7.5 2.5 2. inc.5 q Overall rating out of 10 6.9 0. level: Reading 2.7 — F 0.4 4.5 2.9 2.7 1.8 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.7 2.500: -0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.500: 0.5 5.7 2.5 6.9 2.0 5.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.8 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.7 Math 2.5 2.8 4.7 2.5 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 13.7 q 7.3 n/a 36.1 3.3 17.3 E F 0.5 3.4 — Gr 6 avg.5 n/a 2.1 27.8 Writing 2.7 — Writing 2.5 n/a 3.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.4 4.2 E F 0.0 n/a Mount Royal [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 9.6 2.8 Math 3.0 43. level: Reading 2.3 M 0. of $85.8 2.8 3.2 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 14.200: -0.2 n/a 37.5 6.0 — 5.2 Math M 0.3 2.4 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 2.3 1.0 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.1 6.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 6.7 2.7 45.5 2.4 2.0 2. level: Reading 2. of $79.5 2.5 2.2 — Math F 0.6 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 10.4 — Tests below standard (%) 56.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.3 1.6 — Our Lady of Peace [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 15.1 F 0.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 39.1 3.6 6.9 3. of $63.4 2.0 — 3.7 3.7 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.3 M 0.8 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 7.4 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.3 F 0.6 6.8 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.3 n/a F 0.0 35.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 30.9 2.4 2.7 2. of $118.2 — 29.4 n/a 5.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.6 6. level: Reading 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 7.8 — 2.6 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 96 Special needs (%): 9.5 2.6 Special needs (%): 11.1 — Writing 2.2 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 7.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.6 2.1 F 0. of $67.6 2.5 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 35.000: 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 6.9 2.4 Math 2.8 3.6 0. inc.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 114 Special needs (%): 11.8 2.1 — Huttonville [Public] Huttonville ESL (%): 11.3 5.7 2.9 2.600: 0.2 F 0.6 — 2.6 7.1 F 0.0 — 2.3 2.0 n/a 1.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 F 0.1 0. inc.4 n/a 2.4 2.1 n/a F 0. of $90.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 F 0.7 — Math 2.3 F 0.2 F 0.8 2.400: 1.8 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 30.7 n/a 2.4 Overall rank: 964/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.5 F 0.3 F 0.8 2. inc.9 2.4 2.1 n/a 27.8 2.9 2.2 — 19.4 — Writing 2.4 M 0.1 — 11.5 2.4 45.8 — 2.0 37.5 2.7 2.6 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.7 2.0 n/a 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.6 Math 2.7 2.9 — Math 2.9 Math 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.4 2. inc.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 M 0.9 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.1 n/a 30.7 0.8 2.3 F 0.3 F 0.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 n/a 2.6 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 2.9 — Writing 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.0 2.8 2.5 5.7 2.5 2.6 2.9 — Math 2.2 5.6 2.5 2.2 n/a M 0.7 n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 7.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 F 0.0 2.7 2.7 6.3 1.8 — Writing 2.7 3.9 2.8 6.0 Gr 6 avg.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 F 0.4 0.5 2.8 — F 0.5 — Overall rating out of 10 3.7 n/a 2.7 2.2 33.4 — F 0.1 F 0.3 — Tests below standard (%) 38.8 3.9 2.2 M 0.5 2.5 n/a 2.1 30.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.1 E n/a 32.5 7.4 2.1 M 0.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.3 F 0.8 n/a 2.5 E F 0.9 n/a 1.2 — Math 2.9 3.8 2.3 2.9 25.2 E — Math E E E E M 0.8 2. of $60.1 43.8 2.3 F 0.5 2.8 2.8 3.2 2.1 31.1 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — F 0.7 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.7 2.6 — Math 2.1 M 0.8 3.5 Writing 2.9 3.7 Math 2.8 2.2 F 0.7 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — 5 6.1 — Overall rating out of 10 2.3 F 0.900: -0.6 Math 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 60.3 n/a Math E n/a M 0.5 n/a n/a n/a M 0.9 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.8 Overall rank: 2311/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 6.0 — 0.6 q Writing 2.5 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Overall rank: 2262/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.8 6.6 Gr 6 avg.9 Tests not written (%) 4.6 2.6 2.300: 0.3 n/a F 0.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading E E E F 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.7 2.4 32.6 6.7 2.4 2.9 4.5 2. level: Reading 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Parkway [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 38.1 40.6 2. of $62.6 Overall rank: 1038/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2.1 49.8 1.9 2.8 — Writing 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.1 6.4 M 0. inc.9 n/a 2.9 2.5 2.800: 0.7 42.5 2.0 2.6 — Palgrave [Public] Palgrave ESL (%): 0.3 — M 0.3 — Helen Wilson [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 7.2 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1443/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 — Lester B Pearson [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 6.7 2.4 2.2 F 0.8 2.7 2.1 2.5 — Holy Family [Catholic] Bolton ESL (%): 1.0 q Writing 2.2 F 0.6 2.6 2.7 — 2. of $69.9 2.3 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 1.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Tests not written (%) 2.9 2.9 2.9 4. of $76.3 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.4 n/a 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 99 Special needs (%): 8. inc.5 — Math 2.3 1.6 2.9 36.0 2.7 Special needs (%): 20.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 31.6 2.1 5.8 n/a 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.5 2.44 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Guardian Angels [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 72 ESL (%): 5.3 2.3 2.4 2.9 3.4 F 0.6 5.1 32.7 2.1 6.1 F 0.4 27.6 p Writing 2.1 n/a Math F 0.8 7.8 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 q Holy Spirit [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 4.7 — Macville [Public] Bolton Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.8 4.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.5 2.6 4.0 n/a .7 2.8 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.1 n/a E F 0.5 2.3 2.5 n/a 2.8 2.1 F 0.8 2.4 36.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 25.6 2.8 — 2.8 2.6 2.8 — 2.8 45.6 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 14.7 10.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 32.1 5.8 2.0 Writing 2.0 2.0 2.4 — Writing 2.9 2.5 2.0 2.8 2.2 F 0.2 F 0.4 2.4 n/a M 0.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 4. inc.1 F 0.1 2.8 — F 0.6 2.6 0.8 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.3 2.1 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.6 — Writing 2.6 Writing 2.6 — Gr 6 avg. inc.5 q Math 2.8 — Math 2.1 2.6 Tests not written (%) 3.1 28.3 — Math F 0.9 2.900: 0.5 — Writing 2.6 23.9 2.9 — 2.2 4.6 6 6.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 6.5 45.5 4. of $70.4 q Math M 0.9 — 3.5 2.7 n/a 6.4 Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2.4 2.0 — Our Lady of Providence [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 4.9 0.9 n/a 2.8 2.1 2.6 2.5 Gr 6 avg.3 1.3 5. inc.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 Tests not written (%) 3.9 — Herb Campbell [Public] Inglewood Gr 6 enrollment: 99 ESL (%): 3.7 n/a E F 0.5 4.5 2.8 — 3.2 2.6 13.4 F 0.9 — Math 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.7 — 2.5 28.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.2 2. of $77.000: -0.9 39.6 2.0 0.9 36.9 n/a 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.3 2.5 2.2 8. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.1 — Math F 0.3 6.3 Writing 2.7 — 3.8 5.1 37.3 F 0.8 2.0 — 3.1 n/a F 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.1 F 0.2 31.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.800: 0.9 7.6 n/a F 0.2 — Mother Mary Ward [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 5.8 — Math 2.7 46. level: Reading 2.5 3.1 Math 3.6 3.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 M 0. inc.9 2.

0 2.5 2.2 2.9 2.5 Overall rank: 667/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 3.3 2.9 38.3 M 0.3 2.4 8.8 2. inc.3 6.1 2.3 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 Special needs (%): 10.6 2.5 4 3.5 2.9 2.6 42.2 6.4 n/a St Angela Merici [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 7.5 2.3 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 33.3 2.7 2.7 2.3 32.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 41.5 2.1 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.8 2.8 2.8 40.7 — Writing 2.9 3.9 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.3 F 0. of $71. inc.9 p St Anne [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 13.6 2.6 5.9 2.2 — Math M 0.5 26.1 St Bonaventure [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 10.7 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.6 — 2.1 — Math 3.8 2.3 2.9 6.3 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 2.0 0.8 — 2. inc.7 2.7 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 F 0. inc.4 F 0.400: 0.1 F 0.6 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.2 1.1 — F 0.1 8.2 — 2.8 2.4 2.9 7.8 2.2 F 0.2 48.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — Writing 3. level: Reading 2.6 41.3 n/a M 0.5 2.4 51. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2226/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.2 39.8 — Sir William Gage [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 140 ESL (%): 8.9 F 0.7 9.8 2.0 3.9 4.0 Overall rating out of 10 3.6 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.1 2.7 3.6 2.7 2.3 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 50. inc.1 2.8 2.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 E F 0.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 59.4 43.7 2.2 — 4.5 2. level: Reading 1.3 n/a M 0.9 n/a Sir Wilfrid Laurier [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 16.9 2.1 — 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.1 32.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.7 2.2 6.3 — Math 2.2 F 0.2 1.8 2.1 E F 0.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.8 1.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 — Writing 2.9 Tests not written (%) 4.6 n/a Math n/a 2.7 — Math 2.7 2. inc.1 Special needs (%): 16.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.0 3.6 2.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.4 40.2 F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 3.4 F 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 30.2 3.2 — 46.5 5.7 2.8 2.1 3.7 — Math 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 33. inc.500: -0.9 4.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.6 1.7 Math 2.2 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.3 Special needs (%): 13.6 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2. level: Reading n/a 2.0 2.3 M 0.9 2.0 — 3.8 2.2 E F 0.6 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 42.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.4 F 0.4 E F 0.3 Writing 2.9 3. of $57. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.200: 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 F 0.7 33.2 1.4 2.5 — F 0.5 2.800: -0.0 5.4 — 2.0 3.4 5.6 3.9 2.7 2.6 3.2 2.5 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 5.0 3.300: -1.4 2.5 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 3.4 — Writing 2.9 — 2.5 2.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 4.8 2.5 2. of $49.7 26.6 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.2 3.6 — Math 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0. inc.7 2.9 2.3 E — Math M 0.9 2.7 Writing 2.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.0 Overall rank: 1499/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2.1 M 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.9 3.0 2.2 34.5 Math 2.1 3.8 6.0 0.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.9 2.8 2.9 2.300: -2.4 2.8 — 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.1 — St Anthony [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 22.9 2.3 7.800: 2.0 2.7 3.4 44. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.4 2.4 F 1.8 2.4 Math 2.8 3.5 F 0.4 2.7 19.0 — Sainte-Jeanne-d’Arc [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 2.6 2.5 2.7 3.5 5. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.5 n/a M 0.5 2.2 9.3 3.2 M 0.6 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.3 26.7 7.2 n/a Somerset Drive [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 85 ESL (%): 2.1 15.3 E E F 0. level: Reading 2.1 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.2 2.7 2.4 Special needs (%): 10.7 0.5 E — Math M 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 E F 0.6 34.2 n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.7 Writing 2.3 5.4 2.3 Math F 0.2 3.9 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 Tests not written (%) 0. level: Reading 2.2 2.7 3.2 — Tests not written (%) 9.2 M 0.8 1.9 — 2.8 2.7 2.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 27.5 2.1 5.5 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.300: -1.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.6 — Math 2.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 2.100: 1. inc.0 2.8 Roberta Bondar [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 115 ESL (%): 13.3 0.2 2. of $66.2 F 0.6 — Writing 2.6 2.6 F 0.7 2.0 p 6.5 — St Agnes [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 29.7 — Math 2.0 Overall rank: 2393/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 M 0.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.5 — Math 2.8 2.9 3.2 2.3 F 0.1 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 — Pope John Paul II [Catholic] Bolton Gr 6 enrollment: 88 ESL (%): 0.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 11.0 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 2127/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 20.1 3.6 0.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 46.6 — E n/a n/a F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.7 Math 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 — 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 — 2.9 — F 0.9 — Sir Winston Churchill [Public] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 16.0 2.4 2.1 9.6 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 4.1 — Tests not written (%) 13.2 — Tests below standard (%) 54.7 2.3 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — Gr 6 avg.2 31.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 3. of $56.4 — Writing 2.7 2.4 q Writing 2.400: -1.9 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.1 5.3 — Tests below standard (%) 56.0 — St Brigid [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 27.2 2.3 2.6 2.3 6.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 3. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.2 E n/a Math n/a E M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 M 0.1 E p Tests below standard (%) 33.1 23.8 3.5 2. inc. of $89.0 2.300: 1.2 F 0.5 51.5 2.6 2.5 Overall rank: 2311/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Tests below standard (%) 36.4 2.3 Special needs (%): 11.7 2.1 5.5 6.4 E — 28.4 — 2.2 — Math F 0.7 2.3 3.8 3.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 1. inc.7 41.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 31.8 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.5 2. inc.4 2.8 2.6 47.7 0.5 2.7 — Math 2.5 Math 2.0 0.6 Overall rank: 511/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 3.8 25.1 1.8 2.8 2.5 2.7 2. of $52.0 0.7 2.9 5.8 2.0 43.3 33.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 Writing 2.8 — 6.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.8 2.7 Math 2.6 2.4 27.3 F 0.1 F 0.8 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 36.8 2.7 — Math 2. inc.4 6.6 2.6 2.8 2.3 2.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.4 2.0 F 0.0 2.9 49.3 2.3 F 0.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.1 F 0.9 — 2.5 2.6 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 1.0 — 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 3.6 — Writing 2.5 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.4 2.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. of $61.8 6.3 F 0.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.7 — 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 5.4 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 6.000: 0.6 5.4 2.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.7 6.7 0.5 2.1 E F 0.8 2.9 2.0 6.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.6 Special needs (%): 1. level: Reading 2.5 Overall rank: 2367/2742 2190/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.1 q Overall rating out of 10 4.7 — Gr 6 avg.3 — Writing 2.3 0.0 0.1 — Math M 0.9 — Writing 2.8 Tests not written (%) 2.4 5.2 M 0.5 1.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — .3 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 38.3 Special needs (%): 9.2 — F 0.3 6.1 2.3 2.8 11.7 2.2 — Writing 2.9 Special needs (%): 7.6 11.8 3.5 n/a 31.5 Writing 2.3 35.0 — Overall rating out of 10 2.5 2.5 Gr 6 avg.7 4.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — St Aidan [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 45 Pauline Vanier [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 13.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 1.0 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 17.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6 7 7.6 2.9 3.3 23.8 2.5 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.3 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 2.1 — Writing 3.6 — 2.5 2.3 n/a n/a F 0.6 2. of $67.0 2.7 2. of $85.9 4.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 46.4 36.2 3.4 27.200: -1.8 2.8 45.6 Overall rank: 843/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.9 2. of $56.3 4.3 — Overall rating out of 10 3.7 2. of $42.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.2 5.6 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.2 F 0.5 2.0 2.4 41.700: 0.6 5 4.3 F 0.0 1.2 2.1 5.8 2.7 2.6 — Writing 2.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 4.0 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.5 2.0 33.4 3.0 2.6 2.2 F 0.7 2.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 37.1 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 83 Special needs (%): 13.5 2.5 — Writing 2.6 2.4 — Writing 2.2 M 0.7 2.5 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 — Math 2.2 48.3 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1677/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.4 Math F 0. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 Special needs (%): 12.6 36.6 2.8 2.4 2.7 — 1.7 n/a Gr 6 avg. of $57.4 2.3 Special needs (%): 4.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.3 p Tests not written (%) 5.5 2.9 57.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 3.6 — Math 2.0 — Math 2.3 2.2 Overall rank: 2035/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.6 2.7 2. of $78.5 2. inc.5 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.4 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.6 2.7 Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 2.0 — Writing 2.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 46.2 Math M 0.4 7.3 Gr 6 avg.5 2.

level: Reading 2.4 — Writing 2.5 2.3 Math 2.9 0.5 2.8 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 7.5 Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.8 5.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 p St Isaac Jogues [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 5.5 F 0.2 2.9 2.3 2.9 0.8 2.3 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.7 St Marguerite Bourgeoys [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 0.5 30.5 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 0.7 39.2 Overall rank: 2146/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.1 6.4 2.8 Math 2.1 6.9 5.2 6.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.7 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 13.7 — F 0.1 M 0.3 1.7 2.5 2.1 E M 0.2 — 0.6 n/a St Jean Brebeuf [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 3.2 2.4 — 5.0 — Writing 2.4 — Math M 0.4 3.8 2.8 2.6 2.7 4.6 — 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 2.1 3.0 Special needs (%): 14.5 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $85.8 — 2.5 27.4 n/a F 0.2 M 0. of $51.5 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 52.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.4 F 0.5 F 0.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 4.0 — 2.1 M 0.0 3.9 2.1 33.0 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 8.1 — Tests below standard (%) 39.5 33.6 6 5.1 — .5 25.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 9.0 3.7 q St Francis Xavier [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 20.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 n/a n/a 41.4 5.1 — St Lucy [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 8.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.1 Overall rank: 1156/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.2 42.3 Overall rank: 1838/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.5 Math 2. inc.5 2.6 — 4. level: Reading 2.2 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.6 2.3 2.8 2.7 5.7 2.3 Special needs (%): 15.4 2.6 2.600: -0.5 2.4 F 0.1 F 0.7 6.7 2.0 3.9 2.3 — 2.7 2.9 33.6 — 2.5 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 4. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 2.7 — Math 2.4 Math 2.8 37.3 5.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 M 0. of $65.6 2.8 Gr 6 avg.2 — Math F 0.5 — Math 2.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.9 2.0 p Math 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 n/a St Cornelius [Catholic] Caledon East Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.8 — Writing 2.7 36.5 2.9 5.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 0.3 F 0.5 2.6 2.5 2.8 5.2 E F 0.2 2.5 2.6 — Writing 2.3 — St Leonard [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 8.4 50.100: -0.6 — 2.5 2.1 M 0.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 2.9 2.1 M 0.9 2.1 F 0. inc.7 2.7 2.4 2.9 4.6 2.8 2.7 0.8 2.4 1.3 M 0.0 4.4 39.1 M 0.7 2.6 2.1 F 0.4 6.5 Writing 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.1 Overall rank: 902/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E — Math M 0.6 2.2 M 0.1 q St Kevin [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 20.4 F 0.3 F 0.1 46. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2262/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 1.6 2.8 2.6 29.4 F 0.500: -1.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6 6.5 7.6 51.7 2.7 1.2 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 56.1 M 0.800: 0.6 2.3 2.5 2.1 F 0.5 5.3 F 0.2 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 4.7 2.5 — 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 31. level: Reading 2.0 2.600: -0.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.8 — Math 2.3 Writing 2.3 3.800: -1.7 2.9 2.5 2. inc.9 5 6.0 2.7 — Writing 2.6 4.1 F 0.9 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 Special needs (%): 14.8 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 F 0.5 2.6 — Writing 2.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0.5 3.4 2.9 42. inc.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.6 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 13.5 2.0 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 35. inc.7 2.1 2.5 5.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.3 0.6 2.1 F 0. of $70.6 — Math M 0.0 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 1.9 2.4 n/a n/a F 0.6 6.6 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 45. level: Reading 2.4 Math 2.3 Writing 2.3 M 0.4 Writing 2.1 F 0.5 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 46.5 2.5 2.7 2. of $50.6 2.4 — 6.8 2.2 F 0.9 4.8 3.2 29.7 — 2.6 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 8.6 40. level: Reading 2.6 2.2 2.0 p 0.5 19.1 — E F 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 2.4 2.5 — Writing 2. inc.9 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 22.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.9 — Writing 2.4 Special needs (%): 6.1 F 0.4 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 6.8 2.5 4.5 2.3 F 0.3 M 0.0 2.000: -2.2 30.2 n/a M 0.6 2.1 4.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 41.8 — 2.8 31.5 2.8 — Math 2.9 2.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.6 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.100: 0.1 — St Josephine Bakhita [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 18.2 0.7 Gr 6 avg.2 32. inc.0 — 5 5.0 Overall rank: 843/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 44.9 2.7 — 2.0 28.0 0.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 Gr 6 avg.5 Special needs (%): 7.1 0.7 3.9 2. of $98.8 3.9 — St John the Baptist [Catholic] Bolton Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 3.6 6.7 — Writing 2.2 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 Writing 2.0 1.2 — F 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 4.3 4.9 1.3 M 0. of $47.100: -0.7 2.6 3.7 32.7 31.3 5 6.7 Writing 2.3 37.8 2.9 38.1 F 0.7 2.5 2. of $55.6 2.6 2. inc.9 30.4 — St John Bosco [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 11.6 — 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 p 26.9 2.4 — St John Fisher [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 29.8 — Writing 2.3 F 0.2 2.2 p Tests below standard (%) 31.7 Special needs (%): 20.2 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.5 2. of $53.7 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 1.6 2.5 3.9 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 5.2 n/a M 0.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 4.4 n/a n/a n/a 53.4 2.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 3.6 Math 2.2 M 0.7 2.8 2.2 F 0.8 3.8 2.5 23.6 2.1 Tests not written (%) 0.9 36.6 2.8 32.7 3.9 31.9 2. of $55.0 3.700: -0.5 2.5 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.500: 1.8 41.2 4.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 3.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 M 0.8 2.5 3.5 4. inc.8 2.1 E — Math F 0.1 6.9 2.0 q Tests not written (%) 1.4 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 3.5 4.4 F 0.8 2.2 44.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 2.9 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.7 2.8 — 2.8 2.0 2.9 2.5 2.8 2.1 M 0.7 2.5 2. of $61.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 1.6 5.5 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.5 2.8 5.8 2.9 6.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.8 Tests not written (%) 6.8 p M 0.2 34. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.6 7.3 2.5 2.6 Math 2.1 3.2 2.5 2.6 0.4 2.7 2.500: 0.8 3.2 F 0.7 44.3 43.4 2.1 p Tests below standard (%) 41.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 40.4 2.6 M 0.7 — Writing 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 30.8 — Math 2.4 2.0 1.600: -0.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 3.7 2.7 2.9 26.6 — 2.7 3.200: 1.6 2.7 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.1 29.8 — Math 2.5 4.3 F 0. of $59.6 3. inc.8 — Gr 6 avg.3 Writing 2.3 F 0.2 F 0.4 2.7 — 2.1 3.9 p 5.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 12.1 6. inc.5 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.1 F 0.7 2.9 6. level: Reading 2.3 38.7 2.8 — Math 2.8 2.3 — F 0.8 2.6 2.6 — 2.5 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 Special needs (%): 23.1 2.2 F 0.4 5.1 F 0.8 Special needs (%): 9.5 Math 2.7 43. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.5 2.8 2.5 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 4.5 — 2.5 n/a n/a n/a M 0.0 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.2 29.8 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.4 E — F 0.6 2.7 — 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.2 F 0.8 Tests not written (%) 2.4 0.5 2. inc.1 1.7 2.3 2.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.5 2.5 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2564/2742 2218/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.5 2.8 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Tests not written (%) 4.3 n/a Math F 0.9 — 2.6 2.7 5.46 St Cecilia [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 5.3 2.4 41.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.2 F 0.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 2.6 F 0.1 6.7 — Math 2.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 20 Special needs (%): 40.2 F 0.7 2.0 1.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 1.5 2.5 5.0 1.6 Writing 2. of $73.8 2.1 M 0.1 33.4 29.4 1. inc.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 2.7 40.6 2.0 — Writing 2.9 2.2 45.3 2.8 — St Joseph [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 15.6 2.3 F 0.5 — 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.7 — Writing 2.6 — 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 — Writing 2.9 2.6 Math 2.8 39.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.9 2.8 — Math 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 — 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.9 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 1.0 p St Joachim [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 15.7 — F 0.5 — 2.8 2.6 Math 2.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6. inc. level: Reading 2.4 q 35.2 4. inc.7 — Tests not written (%) 4.6 2.8 — 2.2 2.8 2.5 0.8 — Math 2.8 2.1 — 1.9 — Tests not written (%) 7.6 2.7 2. of $64.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 p 2.2 p 5.2 n/a n/a 38.7 — Math 2.5 2.3 Math M 0.9 2.6 2.1 — Math M 0.5 5.7 2.1 F 0.7 4.0 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.3 F 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 39.8 — Math 2.9 2.2 3.3 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.0 5.3 F 0.6 2.7 2.5 — Math 2.7 2.9 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 — Math 2.7 — Writing 2.5 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.5 q Gr 6 avg.7 — Math 2.6 n/a n/a M 0.

inc.5 Tests not written (%) 0.3 31.4 Math 2.6 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.400: 0.5 2.8 6.400: -0.1 F 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — Overall rating out of 10 4.4 — Math F 0.3 6.500: 0. of $95.8 — 2.7 — 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.3 5.2 — 0.7 2.7 2.4 2.8 — 3.9 — 2.0 0.3 2.8 46.7 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 16.8 — F 0.6 Tests not written (%) 0.6 — Writing 2.4 — 2.0 52.5 Gr 6 avg.0 p 2.5 2.7 2.2 39.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.5 2.4 Writing 2.6 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Math M 0.7 32.7 2.8 6.3 2.8 — 2.8 2.3 E F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 p 3.9 Math 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 13.6 2.1 2.9 2.2 3.7 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 F 0.1 — .2 F 0.4 — 2.3 6.6 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 13. level: Reading 3.4 2.3 Writing 2.6 2.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.6 — 2.2 22.1 1.5 2.9 — 0.4 2.9 6. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 — F 0.1 Special needs (%): 33.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.2 — F 0.7 5.6 2.8 q Agincourt [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 20.4 — St Mary [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 19.1 Tests below standard (%) 34.8 2.8 2.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.2 Math 1.9 — 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 47 TORONTO St Maria Goretti [Catholic] Brampton Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 2.7 — 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 8.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 Math M 0.5 2.7 q 5.2 Tests below standard (%) 12.2 n/a M 0.6 — 2.8 Math 2.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.7 2.4 — 2.6 3.6 — 2.9 3.2 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 40.0 3.0 10.5 6.0 — 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 n/a F 0.4 — F 0.1 9.6 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 1.5 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 7 7.800: 0.1 E n/a Math F 0.6 2.0 2.4 6.5 2.5 45.7 2.8 — 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.8 24.0 — Math 3.7 — 2.8 2.9 2.4 2. inc.5 F 0. inc.4 10 8.4 E M 0.8 2.4 M 0.0 0.8 — 2.0 2.2 Math 3.8 2.5 2.1 p Math 2.3 32.6 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 Tests not written (%) 0.8 — Math 2.5 3.4 5.8 2.0 0.4 2.1 F 0.5 2.2 n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.2 F 0.1 — 40.7 2.4 2.9 2.0 2.7 2.300: -1.0 33.3 1.5 — Albion Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 — 2.5 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 61.1 F 0.1 23.0 2.9 2.4 2.7 Math 3.1 — 5.5 Math 2.7 Math 2. inc.6 2.3 17.6 2.4 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1948/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — 1.5 Math E Tests below standard (%) 45.5 — 2.8 p 2.3 3.9 Overall rank: 573/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.1 9.4 — 1.7 2.3 3.8 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 6.6 2.5 Writing 2.4 6.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 22. level: Reading 2.8 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 72 Special needs (%): 11.7 — Writing 2.7 2.2 — St Ursula [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 4.6 Math 2.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 39.9 2.2 M 0.2 3.3 F 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 72 Special needs (%): 15.4 3.4 2.6 2.3 22.1 n/a n/a 17.5 p Overall rating out of 10 5 4.7 Writing 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.6 2.9 4.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 35.7 2.9 Math 3.6 2.3 F 0.9 2.1 — Adam Beck [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.2 F 0.7 2.6 — F 0. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2.3 Math F 0.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 13.6 2.2 — 37.5 2.3 4.8 — 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.1 7.7 2.7 2.0 2.5 3.6 2.2 E M 0.0 — 5.6 3.7 F 0.1 — 26.9 Overall rank: 1991/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2.3 F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.5 2.9 — 2.6 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.8 Gr 6 avg.3 0. of $42.7 Writing 2.6 — Writing 2.0 Tests not written (%) 0.7 2. inc.6 6.0 3.9 2.6 2.3 2.3 — 3 4.5 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.6 2.6 2.2 3.9 Tests not written (%) 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 Overall rating out of 10 8 St Monica [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 1.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 19. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 26.3 Tests not written (%) 3.4 2.8 — St Stephen [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 8.2 M 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 Math 2.3 3. of $42.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.8 Math 2.7 2. inc.6 2. of $83.4 3.7 8. level: Reading 2.1 44.5 2.4 — F 0.5 2.2 3.7 2.900: 3.3 F 0.3 5.0 — St Rita [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 0.6 — 1.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 111 Special needs (%): 13.3 F 0.5 2.3 Special needs (%): 14.2 5.6 — 2.7 — F 0.1 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.0 — 7.1 — Terry Fox [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.600: 1.5 5.7 — 3.0 — 3.4 8.3 St Patrick [Catholic] Brampton ESL (%): 13.5 Gr 6 avg.4 39.5 45.8 3.1 F 0.9 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.6 6.8 — 13.6 Math F 0.5 7.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.5 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 5.200: -0.5 2.5 2.8 29.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.8 1.1 2.9 0.0 2.2 5.700: 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.2 n/a 31.2 — Alexander Muir/Gladstone Ave [Public] TorontoGr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 6.9 35.9 2.0 2.5 F 0.0 Tests not written (%) 10.3 2.8 1.1 6 6. inc.6 Writing 2.8 31.1 — 42.2 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 Writing 2. inc.0 1.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 25 Special needs (%): 12. level: Reading 2.4 34.3 2.6 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.9 2.7 25. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 34. level: Reading 2.4 n/a M 0.6 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.6 2.3 4.1 F 0.8 3.9 2.2 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 30.1 F 0.0 Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.5 2.9 3.7 2.8 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.4 F 0.3 2.0 0.7 1.4 — 2.8 2.9 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 51.8 2.2 F 0.0 — Treeline [Public] Brampton ESL (%): 19.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 21.7 — 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.3 Tests not written (%) 1.2 E — 50.4 31.200: 0.7 2.0 0.7 — Math 2.6 0.8 — 2.1 Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.6 — Agnes Macphail [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 6.5 2.9 2.0 q 6.5 18.0 Special needs (%): 20.3 Writing 2.0 Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 Gr 6 avg.7 — 2. of $68.0 2.9 1.6 11.6 p Writing 2.9 2.9 2.5 0.9 3.6 Math 2.9 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 — 2.8 2.0 22.4 Tests not written (%) 1.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.8 1.5 2.7 2.0 0.7 2.8 2.9 — M 0.5 32.7 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 42.8 3.6 — Writing 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 5.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 43.1 2.400: -1.7 — 2.9 Writing 2.0 2.8 2.3 2.1 — 5.9 3.1 — 3.5 2.0 2.7 2.2 7.6 2.5 — E E E E — M 0. inc.4 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.0 Gr 6 avg.8 p 2.8 3.6 2.1 E n/a n/a n/a 39.4 5.2 n/a n/a n/a 34. of $60.7 — Gr 6 avg. inc.4 M 0.4 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.4 p 3. inc.2 0. of $90.9 — Math 3.6 6.7 — 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.4 2.8 — 2.200: 0.8 2.6 2.3 3.6 — 2.5 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 p 2.7 2.7 2.7 Math 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.1 — Writing 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.0 p 2.7 — Writing 2.8 — 2.9 2.6 n/a M 0.7 — 2.7 2.6 — 2.3 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 43. level: Reading 3.7 5.1 3.9 p 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 6.3 2. level: Reading 2. of $75.7 2.6 2.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.4 6.400: 0.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 4.5 2.5 2.8 2.7 — 2.8 2.6 2.2 Writing 2.6 15.8 — Math 2.6 — 5.6 46.5 2.6 — 2.1 35.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 6.3 — 34.3 M 0.8 Overall rank: 667/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 22.5 0.5 2.7 3.0 2.3 — M 0.3 F 0. of $65.6 Math 2.4 M 0.2 — F 0.3 7.0 2.9 3.1 2.9 Math 3.5 2.8 Writing 2.7 2.7 3.2 2.3 Writing 2.0 3.7 — 2.4 Math 2.7 2.5 Math 2.3 — F 0.9 — 4.5 2.6 2.6 — 11.3 M 0.6 2.6 3.1 3.1 2.6 Writing 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — M 0.3 F 0. inc.5 2.5 2. inc.5 E F 0.7 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.6 Writing 2.1 0.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 2.9 28.0 0.0 3.8 — Math 2.7 4.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.0 1.6 2.7 2.6 2. inc.3 F 0.1 F 0.2 2.2 F 0.300: 0. of $43.7 2.7 — 0.8 2.0 1.6 2.3 3.9 Math 3. level: Reading 2.5 Writing 2.7 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Special needs (%): 14.6 2.0 Writing 2.0 3.7 7. level: Reading 2.8 37.9 2.0 38. level: Reading 2.4 2.5 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 51.6 2.2 6.4 2.2 28.4 3.9 2.7 — 2.8 q n/a M 0.2 3.0 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2. of $73.8 q 3.6 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.5 Writing 2.6 p F 0.1 F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2.4 M 0.2 8.3 1. level: Reading 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.3 Writing 2.9 3.1 29.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 51. of $43.2 2.9 6.9 2.6 F 0.9 36.7 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.0 — 2.2 36.7 — 2.2 — St Nicholas [Catholic] Bolton ESL (%): 1.4 M 0.0 — 8.0 0.8 1.3 2.1 2.0 Writing 2. of $44.1 Tests below standard (%) 32.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Writing 3.3 n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 75 Special needs (%): 30.7 2. of $61.3 2.2 n/a n/a n/a M 0.9 2.0 3.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.8 2.5 F 0.9 0.3 — 4.5 18.9 28.8 2.6 0.9 Tests not written (%) 10.3 p F 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.7 2.3 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 27.4 F 0.6 2.8 Math 3.1 n/a n/a n/a 18.6 — 2.5 2.200: 1.2 2.1 M 0.7 — 0.7 2.2 E F 0. of $63.0 0.2 — M 0.1 F 0.9 6.4 18.5 2.1 — 3.6 Math 2.7 2.8 q Writing 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.4 F 0.3 46.1 5.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.9 2.4 F 0.5 F 0.3 Math 2.4 31.4 36.0 2.6 — 2.

8 3.8 — 2.3 — F 0.0 3.5 3.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.2 2.0 3.1 4 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 0.4 2. of $39.4 8.9 p E F 0. level: Reading 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 3. level: Reading 3.3 E F 0.2 3.8 3.4 8.0 — 3.9 7.5 2.0 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.9 — 2.4 F 0.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 8.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.5 2.6 2.1 5.6 26.2 — Tests below standard (%) 3. level: Reading 3.2 2.0 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.0 2.8 3.6 M 0.2 2.2 3.1 — 3.1 — 2.5 2.6 46.4 3.500: 1.9 — 2.9 — 3.4 9.6 — 2.7 16.6 Math M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — 3. level: Reading 2.2 — E F 0.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3.8 2. inc.3 5.3 7.2 17.7 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 Math 2.6 4. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.3 — 6.3 3.7 2.3 F 0.2 2.6 M 0.1 E M 0.2 4.8 2.2 M 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 n/a n/a F 0.1 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 34.7 2.7 3.4 3.5 2.3 — 14. of $46.1 3.9 3. of $33.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3.2 6.4 n/a 20.4 7.6 2.3 — Writing 2.8 Gr 6 avg.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $130.3 Tests below standard (%) 37.5 — Tests below standard (%) 53.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 0.9 8.2 Tests below standard (%) 23.5 2.9 3.8 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 E F 0.1 F 0.1 3.9 2.500: 1.3 p Gr 6 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 F 0.2 F 0.9 3.2 48. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 11. level: Reading 2.500: 0.2 14.4 n/a 2.9 — Anson Park [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.1 3.0 11.4 — 7.0 0.3 2.4 3.8 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 9.3 F 0.1 3.2 F 0.1 3.1 Math 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 34.7 — 2.1 2.9 24.6 Writing 2.9 3.200: 0.8 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2.2 3.0 3.1 F 0. inc.9 2.1 10.1 — F 0.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.48 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Alexander Stirling [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.7 7.9 13.9 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 11. level: Reading 3.9 6.4 — Writing 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 4.8 2.400: 0.4 3. level: Reading 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 11.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.1 — 6.1 F 0.9 3.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.2 — 2.2 n/a n/a Math M 0.5 2.7 — F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 — 14.9 2.0 — 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 11.3 3.1 Writing 2.8 3.0 — Math 3.0 — 8.1 3.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 F 0.7 6.3 15.7 — Arbor Glen [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 10.8 Writing 2.3 q Tests not written (%) 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.1 3.6 n/a 2.5 0.2 M 0.5 4.4 2.900: -0.4 2. level: Reading 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.5 6.8 2.1 3.7 n/a Writing 2.2 16.3 2.1 3.6 Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.0 Writing 3.1 29.3 — 3.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 84 Special needs (%): 14.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.1 2.4 — 5.8 7.1 Tests not written (%) 14.1 19.4 p 3.4 30.8 — F 0.5 n/a Math 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 11.7 4.5 n/a Writing 2.9 3. level: Reading 2. of $70.6 Math 2.2 — 19.100: -0.6 Writing 2.6 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 2. inc.5 2.4 2.1 3. of $43.3 M 0.5 7.2 F 0.3 6.8 2.0 Math 3.1 q Gr 6 avg.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 M 0.7 2.9 3.8 2.3 16.1 2. of $61.5 — 2.5 Overall rank: 58/2742 18/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 11.2 — F 0. inc.1 F 0. of $249.5 Beaumonde Heights [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 5.2 n/a 3.6 n/a 2.6 3.8 16.5 3.0 5.9 2.7 10. level: Reading 2.5 n/a Math 2.2 — Balmy Beach [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 3.0 3.9 3.9 Gr 6 avg.0 2.6 3.2 Tests not written (%) 8.9 2.0 — E n/a F 0.9 2.2 F 0.0 3.6 2.2 Math 3.0 2.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 0.4 M 0.4 2.5 — 2.9 q 2.5 M 0.1 — 14.4 11.9 2.1 — 3.1 3.9 — Writing 3.0 Gr 6 avg.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math E Tests below standard (%) 20.1 3.2 2.7 58.4 4.9 3.7 2.9 3.1 E n/a 28.7 2.9 7 6.7 27. of $41.0 Tests not written (%) 4.1 — Math F 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.8 Writing 2.4 3.9 Gr 6 avg.4 15.5 2.8 23.4 9.8 Writing 2.1 E M 0.0 Math 3.3 — Math M 0.1 2.3 F 0.4 n/a E n/a F 0.0 3.1 3.0 3.3 M 0.0 — 2.9 2.3 21.1 3.7 8.8 15.0 2.3 46.0 3.7 2.2 3.1 3.1 — 2.8 — 2.6 2.6 2. of $67.6 — 28.9 Math 3. inc.1 n/a E n/a F 0.9 3. inc.0 Overall rank: 573/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 p Tests not written (%) 2.0 — Alexmuir [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.2 3.5 3.3 n/a Banting and Best [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 16.2 Tests below standard (%) 45.4 — M 0.1 18.4 18.4 2.1 E F 0. inc.8 p Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 39.7 — 2.4 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 3.1 0.0 — 8 8.5 2.1 3.9 5.8 3.7 2.4 — 2.0 3.1 3.2 2.1 3.3 Math F 0.6 Writing 2.0 — 7 8.5 Math F 0.9 8.2 7.8 3.5 Special needs (%): 10.1 — 18.5 3.100: 0.4 F 0.2 9 8 8.100: -1.7 14.2 3.4 5.1 3.3 2.8 2.1 7.7 2.0 2.1 2.9 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 9.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.5 Math 2.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 20.9 3.0 3.3 n/a Tests not written (%) 7.9 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 66 Special needs (%): 16.0 p 5.8 — Writing 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 14.2 6.9 Writing 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 M 0.6 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 Special needs (%): 16.0 9.9 2.0 3. of $60.4 Writing 2.9 2.1 2.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.1 3.8 2.4 2.2 1.2 — 2.5 2.1 2.9 3.3 Tests not written (%) 1.3 3.6 E F 0.6 2.0 p 2.4 Tests not written (%) 5.4 Math 2.4 M 0.9 — F 0.1 36.9 2.3 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 16.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 Special needs (%): 27.8 Math 2.9 2.0 Writing 3.1 — 2.2 — 3.8 0.7 — 2.3 F 0.3 — F 0.8 2.7 Gr 6 avg. inc.5 42.4 Writing 2.5 Overall rank: 787/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Annunciation [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 6.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.2 E F 0.2 F 0.6 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 10.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 — 3.3 F 0.3 n/a 2.7 4. inc.3 — Annette Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 3.9 3.0 13.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2.4 q Tests not written (%) 4.8 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 34.3 2.0 8.5 Overall rank: 2262/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — 2.2 2.0 3.2 — 3.0 2.2 — 2.2 3. inc.9 p 2.8 — 3.1 15.0 2.1 43.1 F 0.3 2.9 3.5 2.9 2.1 M 0.6 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 5.0 0. of $218.6 Math 2.2 3.9 — 2.9 Gr 6 avg.6 — 2.5 — M 0.9 3.5 2.0 3.5 53.4 8.7 2.9 — 2.9 Math 3.7 2.9 3.9 — 2.1 p F 0.0 2.5 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 5.2 E M 0.9 — 2.3 Math M 0.1 3. level: Reading 2.0 q Math 3.1 3.0 — 3.1 F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.4 — 32.8 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.6 2.1 9 7.2 n/a 48.1 E F 0.2 Writing 3.7 — Writing 2.6 Tests not written (%) 8.2 3.0 p Allenby [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 Math 2.1 — Armour Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 F 0.7 Tests not written (%) 15.0 Math 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.7 2.1 2.5 6.6 Tests not written (%) 6.9 — Math 3. level: Reading 3.9 — 5.5 2.1 3.2 3.0 7.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 Writing 2.7 2.6 2.4 — M 0.7 n/a 2.1 3.8 — Math 2.4 q Math 2.2 37.1 Math F 0.0 2.2 F 0.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3. level: Reading 2.6 Math 2.7 7.7 24.8 — 2.7 Writing 2.6 2.8 3.4 — All Saints [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 9.1 n/a n/a 35.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.8 — .000: 3.9 3.0 3.8 2.3 q Bedford Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 28.0 — 3.7 2.1 F 0.1 p 9.5 16.0 3.9 3.2 3.3 F 0.1 M 0.6 8.9 3.8 5.7 20.5 2.1 — 6.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 4.8 — F 0.5 2.2 — 3.6 Bellmere [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 2.5 2.7 3.8 — 7.3 3.3 F 0.2 2. inc.5 — 14.7 2.9 9.2 q Writing 3. inc.0 — 7. inc. inc.7 60.200: 3.7 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 18.9 38.7 q Writing 2.9 3.1 9.8 2.4 E F 0.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.6 — Writing 3.5 15.2 8.3 3.3 Writing 3.2 q Overall rating out of 10 4.7 2.2 Special needs (%): 15. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.9 — 3. level: Reading 3.7 2.8 2.6 13.0 0.1 9. level: Reading 2.9 — 3.2 3.8 3.9 2.3 3.2 3. level: Reading 2.3 E M 0.1 — F 0.7 q 8.4 3.7 Math 2.1 M 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 47.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — 2.1 2.3 F 0.2 2.5 5.1 — 2.2 F 0.8 2.3 — 4.4 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 17.3 2. level: Reading 3.5 8. of $224.5 2.0 2.0 Writing 3.9 Writing 3.4 — F 0.2 F 0.4 Overall rating out of 10 5. of $39.1 2.4 2.8 2.1 p Gr 6 avg.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.8 2.2 — Math E E E E M 0.3 F 0.8 2.0 14.700: 2.3 3.6 1.5 2.3 Gr 6 avg.8 Writing 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 5.5 0.1 — 13. of $103.0 3.8 2.6 9.5 0.4 6.4 2.9 — Math 2.9 3.9 2.4 Overall rank: 2575/2742 2239/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 58/2742 58/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 3.4 — Anson S Taylor [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 2.6 2.4 Tests not written (%) 5.5 F 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 17.0 3.6 8.0 3.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.2 28. level: Reading 2.0 2.0 Math 3.2 — 3.1 3.8 13.3 — Math 3.2 3.0 3.6 11.0 Math 2.7 2.8 — 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 19.1 n/a F 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.7 2.1 2.2 3.6 Gr 6 avg.5 — 2.8 Math 3.9 — 3.0 2.4 n/a 2.400: -2.8 Writing 2.600: -1.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 76 Special needs (%): 11.0 2.2 F 0.3 n/a 9.600: 1.1 M 0.8 Math 2.9 4.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 3.9 9.8 2.

5 — Writing 2.3 M 0.0 3.1 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 3.3 n/a 3.8 n/a Writing 3.9 17.4 — 8 7.5 13.9 0. of $623.2 3.2 31.9 2.9 3.8 6.9 3.3 p Math 2.5 3.1 n/a 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.3 1.9 2.1 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 396/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 32.0 3. inc.2 n/a F 0.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 — 3.9 3.0 0.5 — 8.7 2.3 n/a F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 0.4 2. level: Reading 2.4 7.0 n/a Math 3.9 2. of $395. level: Reading 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.4 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 17.2 3.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.6 Tests not written (%) 8.1 — Writing 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 8.9 3. level: Reading 3.9 2.6 5.8 2.9 Tests not written (%) 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 15.9 18.9 — Blessed John XXIII [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 10.6 2.8 9.8 — .8 2.3 8.3 2.0 3.4 5.1 F 0.1 6.3 n/a E n/a 15. level: Reading 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 8.7 3.3 3.8 — Writing 2.4 15.2 n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2.2 3.6 2.7 16.4 2.3 3.8 — 2.3 9.0 Tests not written (%) 6.8 Overall rank: 1/2742 18/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.7 2.8 5.8 2.0 3.2 E M 0.3 1.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 2.9 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 q Writing 2.1 M 0.8 2.8 2.7 7. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.4 5.9 2. inc.6 7.2 41.8 — 2.4 2.0 2.4 Math 2.9 3.1 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 8.1 F 0.3 3.0 2.6 — 3.5 F 0.6 Special needs (%): 7.0 2.0 3.2 F 0.0 3.1 3.2 F 0.1 3.3 1.2 n/a n/a Math E E F 0.7 2.6 3.3 2. of $272.1 F 0.3 2.7 3.0 4.8 — 2.1 — E F 0.1 n/a 3. inc.9 8.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.6 — Math 2.2 6.8 2.6 7.9 6. level: Reading 3.8 n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.0 2.0 2.8 3.0 2.9 — 2.1 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Overall rank: 1087/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 21.3 3.6 Writing 2.1 7.400: 1.1 3.1 q Overall rating out of 10 6.5 — Writing 2.0 6.8 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Special needs (%): 20.8 4.1 3.3 2.6 6. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 19/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1431/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 2.8 2.5 2.7 2. of $41.0 — Math 3.7 27.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 2.2 M 0.8 — 49 Bialik Hebrew Day [Private] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 77 ESL (%): 0.5 Overall rank: 212/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 3.7 9.5 — 2.1 3.7 Math 2.2 3.3 7. inc.0 n/a 7.9 2.8 Math 2.2 M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.1 — F 0.0 0.6 50.8 — Math 3.7 8.9 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.4 — Bessborough Drive [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 2.2 3.1 2.1 41. of $58.6 2.4 5.0 p Overall rating out of 10 8.6 4.7 — 2.7 2. of $67.0 2.8 2.2 — Writing 2.5 — Writing 2.0 — Math 3.8 Math 3.9 2.8 — Math 2. of $47.0 0.1 3.4 — Beverly Glen [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.0 2.5 2.1 39.9 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.2 2.9 13.1 — 38.0 3.6 Special needs (%): 19.2 M 0.9 3.0 — Math 2.7 — 2.6 3.2 2.2 — 2.9 2.1 M 0.7 68.5 — Blake Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 — Writing 2.100: -3.6 6.2 n/a n/a Math E F 0.9 — 3.5 2.4 n/a F 0.3 47.5 12.0 9.9 — Math 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 61.7 2.3 F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1991/2742 2229/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 3.8 2.7 2.2 3.1 2.3 2 3.0 2.7 2.0 3.4 3.3 2.7 — Writing 2.4 3.1 3.0 Special needs (%): 32.3 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.1 28.2 — 2.5 n/a F 0.0 — 2.2 10.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 24.5 2.9 2.7 2.7 2. inc.6 2. inc.2 3.8 2.7 2. level: Reading 3. inc.0 1.1 — Math M 0.8 2.7 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 25.7 Blantyre [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.0 2.0 2.7 17.0 Special needs (%): 22.6 Math 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 10 n/a 9.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 2.5 6.900: 2.9 8.0 1.8 Bishop Strachan [Private] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 0.5 Writing 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.4 — 2.1 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2 3.6 20.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 396/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 0.9 7.2 n/a 3.7 2.0 n/a F 0.1 Math M 0.7 2.7 2.7 29.9 Overall rank: 212/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 3.4 10.500: 3.2 — 3.6 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.0 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 2.8 3.4 Tests below standard (%) 29.8 3.8 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2. inc.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.4 18.0 — 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 3.3 3.2 3.9 Writing 2.0 2.0 n/a Writing 2.0 — 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 12.8 2.1 2.7 — E E M 0.4 2.7 2.4 28.1 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.3 2.8 2. of $51.8 7.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 31.7 2.3 28.3 — Writing 3. of $271.5 Writing 2.1 3. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 3.4 — 2.2 29.9 8.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 26.2 n/a E n/a 41.1 0.9 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.9 2.8 2.4 n/a Birch Cliff [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 8.5 4.2 3.4 6.0 Math 3.2 9 9 6.3 Math M 0.200: 0.6 2.9 2.5 6.6 6. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.1 n/a n/a F 0.7 Writing 2.6 — 9.2 E M 0.1 n/a 8.9 3.4 2.0 Tests not written (%) 7.1 8 7.8 7.4 2.1 38.1 3.500: -3.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.6 Math 2.8 — Bennington Heights [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.3 3.6 3.8 — 3.9 Writing 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Gr 6 avg.4 5.0 — Writing 2.1 1.7 3.9 3.3 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 11.8 — Blessed Margherita of Citta Castello [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.7 3.2 F 0.3 8.0 q Tests not written (%) 9.2 M 0.2 3.9 3.2 F 0.5 12. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 98/2742 46/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 2.4 2.2 p Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 16.0 2.0 3.7 3.7 3. level: Reading 3.1 M 0.3 n/a n/a F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 6.7 15.6 2.9 3.9 2.9 2.2 23.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 16.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.1 34.6 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 42.2 Tests below standard (%) 43.0 3.0 4.9 2.5 2.1 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.8 q Math 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 37. level: Reading 3.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 8.6 2. inc.3 3. of $62.4 2.1 — M 0.9 q 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.4 2.8 — Writing 2.500: -1.1 Math M 0.9 2.4 11.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.2 — Writing 3.0 — Blythwood [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.6 2.4 2.0 Gr 6 avg.1 2.0 Tests not written (%) 13.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 8.3 Math 2.4 — Math 3.0 — 2.8 11.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.0 0.5 4.9 — Math 2.5 38.9 — 1.3 3.1 3.2 p Math 3.4 9.5 5. inc.8 3.5 2.1 2.4 2.1 — 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3.600: 2.9 n/a 3.5 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 3.8 13.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 19.8 3.8 2.0 3.1 6. inc.2 Writing 2.5 3.6 9.0 21.4 — Writing 3.8 4.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 0.1 2.5 2.6 2.0 3.4 — 5.8 Math 3. level: Reading 2.3 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 51.2 Writing 2.3 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 25.7 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 F 0.4 2.6 2.0 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 — 4.7 q Overall rating out of 10 8.6 Math 2.4 5.9 2.6 2.5 2.9 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 15.1 F 0.9 3.7 2.3 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 7.2 3.8 9.3 3.300: 1.3 4.0 2.0 1. of $40.9 — Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 17.2 3.6 13.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.3 F 0.500: -0.7 3.9 2.2 3.8 8.2 F 0.8 2.5 2.1 10.1 3.6 2.6 27.9 2.7 3.6 2.8 2.9 n/a Blessed Sacrament [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 1.6 2.0 2.4 n/a 3.1 3.9 3.0 — Blessed Trinity [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 15.9 — 8.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3. level: Reading 2. inc.3 3.1 — Math 2.1 2. inc.1 1.8 2.8 n/a Math 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 29.6 Overall rank: 902/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 21.8 — 2.9 Writing 2.5 2.4 3.1 n/a F 0.3 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 10.9 — 3.3 M 0.2 M 0.7 — F 0.4 0.9 2.2 3.3 F 0.8 2.8 15.9 6.3 3.300: -6.0 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 17. level: Reading 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.9 8.3 n/a Math M 0.4 Overall rank: 86/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — 15.8 — Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 F 0.7 2.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.6 8.4 3.3 5.1 E — M 0.4 3.3 — Overall rating out of 10 9.6 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.0 3.2 3.3 — Math 2.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2.5 2.1 E — Math M 0.0 0.1 M 0.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Bendale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 10.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 29.3 n/a F 0.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.3 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.2 3.3 3.4 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 4.7 2.8 3.6 2.100: -0. level: Reading 2.2 9.9 p Gr 6 avg.9 — 1.6 22.1 F 1. of $31.2 3.9 14. inc.0 — Berner Trail [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 3.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 51.3 — Overall rating out of 10 3.9 3.9 3.6 — F 0.4 3.8 — 3.0 2.8 2.0 0.0 Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 17.3 E n/a E n/a 54.1 2.4 Gr 6 avg.

1 3.7 3.0 42.7 — Math 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.8 — Overall rating out of 10 6. of $48.3 5. inc. of $37.8 58.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.5 2. of $291.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 — Tests below standard (%) 32.0 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.1 Math M 0.700: 1.9 3.9 — 3.1 6. of $44.9 6.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.8 — F 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.1 E F 0.0 — 3.7 2.5 2.5 2.7 6. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 2.2 F 0.600: 1.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 8.7 2.9 14.8 Gr 6 avg.3 2.6 Brookside [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 65 ESL (%): 0.8 2.9 3.8 3.6 13.5 — F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.9 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.9 3.8 — Writing 2.6 4.4 — Writing 2.6 2. level: Reading 3.7 — 9.4 M 0.1 E F 0.3 2.6 2.8 7. inc.0 2.3 — 2.5 — Math 2.5 n/a 3.9 2.9 29.8 2.6 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 2.3 2.4 n/a Math M 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.9 2.7 2.5 2.8 Gr 6 avg.2 6.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 7.3 14.3 n/a 2.1 2.2 4.9 Overall rank: 71/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 8 8.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 14. of $46.5 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.5 Math 2.800: 0.8 — 3.7 5.2 — F 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 20.0 2.8 3.3 — Math 3.7 6.1 29.4 — 8.6 2.5 E E E — 14.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.2 n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.9 — Tests not written (%) 5.9 n/a 16.7 2.0 13.900: -1.9 2.6 Math 2.2 2.900: -2.8 Writing 2.0 5.5 Overall rating out of 10 8.5 — 2.9 — Math 3.7 2.9 — Writing 2.1 3.2 E n/a n/a F 0.8 6.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 Writing 2.3 F 0.9 2.0 — 2.7 3.8 1.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 6.5 2.9 2.4 — Burrows Hall [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.8 — Math 2.9 2.8 q Bruce [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.1 3.9 n/a 37.7 2.1 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 3.4 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — E F 0.6 53.7 q Math 2.6 2.9 Gr 6 avg.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.1 2.8 Math 2.500: 0.5 2.9 2.2 5.0 2.6 n/a 2.1 2.2 3.0 — 7.3 F 0.5 1. of $76.6 12.3 n/a 4. inc.3 3.3 2.4 5.0 — .0 Special needs (%): 33.5 2.5 13.9 3. level: Reading 2.2 2.5 n/a C D Farquharson [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 0.7 q 2.7 3.7 2.5 2.6 2.4 3.8 Math 2.9 2.0 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 10.4 — 2.3 Math M 0.4 2. inc.9 q 8.9 — 18.7 — Writing 3.1 Writing 3.6 — F 0.9 2.1 3. of $36.8 25.6 37.4 Tests below standard (%) 16.1 M 0.4 2.6 39.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E M 0.8 2.3 3. inc.100: 1.5 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 22 Special needs (%): 50.9 7.6 2.3 2.6 — Writing 2.3 3.8 — 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.3 p Gr 6 avg.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2.3 16.9 3.3 6.2 2.0 3.4 2.5 2.1 E n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 E F 0.1 11. level: Reading 2.4 10.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 23.2 M 0.6 — 7.3 9.0 Writing 3.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 29.7 3.8 6.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 — Math 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 7.0 — 3.3 Tests not written (%) 1.4 26.3 F 0.6 3.3 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 F 0.4 2.3 2.1 3.7 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 3.5 6.3 2.8 n/a 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 8.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.7 Math 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 6.9 2.3 3.1 1. level: Reading 2.9 — 3.8 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.3 — Buchanan [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 — 3.7 — 2.6 2.8 2.3 25. inc.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 q 2.2 3.1 — 11.2 F 0.6 2.9 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.2 18.6 n/a 2. inc.0 2.8 2.3 6.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 q 2.1 5.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 22.2 M 0.9 2.2 8.7 0.8 Overall rank: 1215/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 34.6 2.5 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 11.2 — E F 0.8 3.6 — 2.9 2.6 2.5 — Carleton Village [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 2. inc.9 3.3 2.7 2.9 q Tests not written (%) 5.4 2.1 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.6 23.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 — 63.9 13.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 30.6 F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a 26.8 6.0 3.0 2.6 — F 0.7 13.7 3.2 n/a n/a M 0. inc.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 27 Special needs (%): 25.9 Tests not written (%) 12.9 3.1 25.5 2.8 2. of $65. of $36.5 3.6 2.800: -0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $48.3 — 2.3 31.1 3.9 2.6 n/a 2.2 3.3 15.9 Tests not written (%) 1.2 — Brimwood Boulevard [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 12.3 — 7.2 Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.4 2.0 2.4 5.9 — Writing 3.7 3.3 7.9 3.8 2.3 28.6 Tests not written (%) 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2638/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.9 Gr 6 avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 30. level: Reading 3.3 15.7 2.2 2.6 2.0 2.1 3.1 — Brookmill Boulevard [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 5.0 p Gr 6 avg.0 0.8 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.4 5.5 Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 2.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 23.6 Math 2.6 Writing 2.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 — Tests not written (%) 11.6 Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.8 Writing 2.3 n/a F 0.0 0.0 Gr 6 avg.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.000: -1.1 Gr 6 avg.0 2.1 3.8 2.2 Math M 0.4 n/a Cardinal Leger [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 3.0 3.3 30.3 — 2.4 7.600: 2.5 5 8.0 3.6 28.6 M 0.0 3. level: Reading 2.7 q Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.0 2.3 12.4 8 6.2 Math 3.2 — Math F 0.6 — 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 7 Brian [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 32.8 Writing 2.9 8.0 Special needs (%): 20.300: -1.8 3.5 1.6 2.9 8 7.4 2. level: Reading 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 2.6 3.6 — 0.0 2.5 2.0 — 2.8 Tests not written (%) 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 9.9 2.800: 0.5 2.3 6.2 Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.7 2. level: Reading 2. of $38.4 Writing 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 — 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 27.3 3.8 2.0 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.9 2.9 — 3.3 — Math F 0.6 2.1 2.3 Math F 0. inc. inc.0 — Writing 2.8 3.1 Math 3.3 — F 0.0 — Brown [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 3.1 M 0.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.9 3.2 3.2 F 0.8 4.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 2.7 3.3 25.4 F 0.9 Writing 2.6 Tests not written (%) 5.8 2.7 3.1 6.400: 0.9 n/a 5.8 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.7 3.7 2.1 4.5 40.1 15.3 48.8 14.9 q 3.8 32.9 3.1 2.6 6.5 3.6 2.7 3.9 3.3 3.9 q 2.0 2.6 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 3.2 F 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 34.0 — 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.1 M 0.4 2.4 — 1.6 27.50 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Bowmore Road [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 0.7 Math 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.7 3.2 21.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Overall rank: 1215/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 4.6 Writing 2.7 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 40.1 5.9 3.9 p 3.8 2.7 Writing 2.2 Special needs (%): 12.7 50.8 — 2.7 2.6 Math 2.6 Writing 2.9 6 4.8 2.8 — 2.3 F 0.0 p F 0.8 3.8 q Math 3.4 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 M 0. of $61. level: Reading 3.7 Math 2.1 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 3.0 32.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.500: 3.8 — Writing 2. of $53.8 2.2 n/a n/a n/a 25.3 E — 17.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 33.8 q Brooks Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 8.6 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 28.4 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.4 F 0.0 16.6 n/a 2.5 — 2.4 3.2 F 0.3 2.0 3.2 34.7 — Gr 6 avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3. level: Reading 2.7 4.4 Tests not written (%) 4.1 4.7 2.8 Math 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.5 q 2.9 n/a 2.1 E F 0.3 42.1 M 0.0 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.5 4.9 Writing 2.4 2.9 7. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 2.5 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.8 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 Special needs (%): 11.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — 2.3 F 0.6 q Overall rating out of 10 7 5.1 n/a n/a 53.4 E F 0.1 — F 0.0 2.6 18.1 2.3 2.1 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 2.9 — 13.2 — 2.0 3.1 M 0.5 q 2.0 — 3.8 2.9 2.1 3.0 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 6. of $58.7 Math 2.1 — 2.7 F 0.6 — 6.1 2. level: Reading 2.9 18.4 4.6 n/a 2. level: Reading 2.3 9.3 — Writing 2.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.0 — 2.3 — 2.5 2.5 Writing 2.0 12.9 3.1 n/a 10.7 2.8 2.6 3.4 2.8 2.7 28.2 M 0.4 10. level: Reading 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.3 q Brock [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.9 2.7 3.7 q 5.1 M 0.8 15.4 2.8 — Canadian Martyrs [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 20.700: 2.5 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 — Writing 2.6 6. inc. of $43.1 E M 0.9 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 Math M 0.1 — E F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 38.3 Writing 2.9 3.4 n/a 2.5 2.5 36.8 3.0 3.4 Tests below standard (%) 44.1 — Tests below standard (%) 34.4 F 0.2 16.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 5.5 2.3 Math 3.2 54.9 2.2 2.9 2.7 q Overall rating out of 10 7.4 3.4 F 0.0 14.8 2.0 — 8.8 29.0 3.4 23.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.5 — M 0.4 30.6 2.6 2.7 n/a 2. inc.0 3.0 — 3.4 2.2 n/a Math E E n/a n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.5 Overall rank: 787/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Math 2.0 Math 3.3 M 0.1 Writing 3.3 Overall rank: 1556/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 p 3.7 3.4 — 2.8 Math 3.4 F 0.5 8.9 2.8 — Math 2.7 — 2.5 2.9 Math 3.

6 — 2.1 2.7 8.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 F 0.1 — 3.5 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 38.5 2.8 2.1 3.2 p Church Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.5 7.1 33.9 Tests not written (%) 25. inc.6 2.8 — Writing 2.7 6.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 3. level: Reading 2.000: 2.3 — 2.3 7 7.9 3.6 2.3 n/a n/a n/a 12.2 16.4 2.9 Writing 3.4 2.9 2.4 — 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.8 3.4 2.7 41.5 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.8 2.6 2.5 2.9 12.5 — Chester Le [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.0 10.0 — 2.9 2.2 2.5 3.8 5.0 2.9 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 30.3 — Writing 2.5 F 0.1 Math 2.3 2.2 27.0 20.600: 2.0 — 2.3 Tests not written (%) 31.7 2.2 6.5 8.7 — Churchill Heights [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 80 ESL (%): 0.9 22.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Math 3.4 Writing 2.6 2.0 — Writing 2.7 3.0 3.2 — 2. inc.3 n/a M 0.3 4.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.2 F 0.5 — Cedarvale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3. of $29.1 Overall rank: 2583/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.6 27.9 2.6 — 2.0 3.4 13.0 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3. of $23.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.5 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 8.6 Writing 2.1 2.0 2.4 F 0.1 F 0.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 3. inc.3 1.0 — Tests not written (%) 4.8 2.2 Gr 6 avg.5 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.3 — F 0.7 1.7 2.9 2.4 25.1 45.6 26.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — Writing 2.7 7.3 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.0 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.2 Math F 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 9.2 n/a M 0.8 5.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Writing 2.4 18.4 6.400: 1. of $93.8 3.3 3.4 34.8 2.4 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 2.5 2.6 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 4. level: Reading 3.1 3.6 2.0 37.6 — 2.1 Math M 0.3 F 0.4 3.400: -0.7 2.8 2.5 n/a Math F 0.5 p Gr 6 avg. inc.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 2.0 36.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Tests not written (%) 11.7 5.3 2.7 1.600: -0.9 2.5 6.8 2.8 2.8 3.6 2.8 — Math 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.2 F 0.5 — 2.3 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.5 1.7 — 2. inc.4 2.2 2.4 2.9 — 3.6 5.0 2.5 7.8 — 3.1 Overall rank: 511/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.1 F 0.8 2.9 3.5 Gr 6 avg.7 51.5 1.0 2.0 2.9 28.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 11.0 2.7 Math 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 2.1 F 0.2 — 2.2 5.900: -2.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.9 3.6 — 2.6 2.3 13. level: Reading 2.5 6.5 1. level: Reading 2. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.600: -0.6 2.9 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 10.7 2.3 3.8 3.8 2.2 — Charles E Webster [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 15.4 Overall rating out of 10 9.3 2.8 2.3 2.7 6.5 Gr 6 avg.8 3.7 2.500: 1.9 6.0 8.3 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.8 3.1 8.2 — Tests not written (%) 8.3 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.5 2.9 — 2.0 — 3.0 3.8 — n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 46.4 Gr 6 avg.9 2.7 2.6 q Math 2.1 2.9 2.2 47.8 2.9 Writing 2.6 2.7 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.7 3.5 7.7 3.8 3.0 18.8 2.0 3.9 — Math 3.9 30.9 — Gr 6 avg. inc.8 4.6 2.9 — 2.2 3.6 2.5 18.5 2.7 2.3 6.1 8 7.2 E M 0.2 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.1 3.2 E — Math E F 0.8 Writing 2.6 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.1 2.5 3.8 2.1 — 3.5 — F 0.9 2.6 q 2.3 2.8 — Writing 3.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.1 — Writing 3.2 2.1 5.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.1 28. of $20.7 q 5.8 3.1 18.1 — Tests below standard (%) 25.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 23.1 F 0.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.7 2.6 2. level: Reading 2. of $139.0 Writing 2.9 — 2.9 23. level: Reading 2.7 — Writing 2.7 42.8 3.2 3.7 Math 2.1 3.600: 1.1 34.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.8 Writing 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2.5 2.3 19.9 — 2.8 2.9 — 11.3 7.5 2.8 Math 2.2 F 0.8 2.0 — Math 3.2 31.9 8.7 — Writing 2.6 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 60.9 Gr 6 avg.9 2.3 n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 26.2 — F 0.7 3.0 2.4 Math 2.8 7.3 F 0.4 3.5 2.1 F 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 5.6 3.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.4 Math 2.7 2.5 — Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.6 — 2.4 — 4.7 7.4 2.6 36.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a M 0.6 — Christ the King [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 8.7 — Charlottetown [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.2 — Writing 2.5 — Cedarbrook [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.5 F 0.2 7.0 0.0 3.5 5.1 0.8 2. of $41.8 6.1 2.5 2. of $164.4 29.6 8.8 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.6 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.5 7.6 2.6 2.4 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 51 Cedar Drive [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.3 2. inc.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Tests below standard (%) 42.6 — Math 2.1 3.0 3.4 — Writing 2.1 F 0.0 3.5 2.8 — 3.3 — Writing 2.7 2.5 — E F 0.9 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.5 36.4 2.6 25.2 3.9 3.5 2. of $58.8 2.6 — Math 2.8 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.1 — 2.5 n/a E n/a F 0.5 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.8 — 7.0 0.2 F 0.5 2.5 12.9 2.7 2.1 5.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 1.4 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.2 20.2 2.7 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.2 Math 3.5 Gr 6 avg.7 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.7 2.3 2.1 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.4 24.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 67 Special needs (%): 34.2 Overall rank: 147/2742 177/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 Tests below standard (%) 59.0 2. of $55.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.6 3.3 5.6 2. inc.1 3.0 0.7 2.5 — Charles G Fraser [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 5. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.1 — 2.0 2.7 2.2 E — M 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.3 3.9 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 26.1 E — 37. level: Reading 2.2 — Centennial Road [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 0.6 1.7 Math 2.5 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Special needs (%): 40.6 2.4 2.800: 0.6 3. inc.0 — 2.6 4.8 45.5 — Writing 3.2 E p Math F 0.0 — F 0.6 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 36.6 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.6 2.1 Writing 2.4 2.7 — Math 2.8 9.0 — Writing 2.7 Math 2.8 — Math 2.2 n/a 17.6 Math 2.9 — Chartland [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.2 2.4 F 0.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E M 0.1 3.4 53. level: Reading 2.5 2.2 2.8 2.4 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 22.8 3.3 Gr 6 avg.2 p 2.4 4.0 2.7 3.6 2.7 Tests not written (%) 14.2 3.0 25.0 5.2 — Math 3.6 8.4 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math F 0.9 3.2 24.6 2.0 35.8 2.7 2.7 — Writing 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 — 6.0 2.4 — Writing 2.4 8 7.4 F 0.9 2.2 4.2 2.7 2.2 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 17.4 8.9 4.0 — 2.0 3.0 2.5 — Math 2.6 4.9 2.9 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 13. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 37.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.3 2.5 2.9 3.0 — 2.0 Writing 3. level: Reading 2.0 11.0 — Math 2.0 Overall rank: 511/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $48.2 — 24.8 Tests not written (%) 2.9 3. inc.0 2.5 q 2.9 18.8 3.5 3.2 — 0.6 2.5 2.9 2.9 — Math 2.1 2.4 2.4 2. level: Reading 3.3 — Gr 6 avg.1 Writing 2. of $53.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 35.1 3.7 2.1 — 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 71 Special needs (%): 5. inc.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.5 p n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24.5 F 0.5 F 0.7 4.7 — Gr 6 avg.2 2.4 19.2 7.8 Tests not written (%) 4.0 Math 3.6 2.4 54.8 2.2 3.7 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.1 8.7 Overall rank: 2183/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E F 0.2 M 0.2 — 23.7 3.9 2.3 Tests not written (%) 2. level: Reading 2.5 Overall rank: 667/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2. level: Reading 2. inc.8 2.600: -0.9 2. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.4 1.9 2.1 2.3 Math 2.8 1.0 Special needs (%): 28.9 3.7 Math 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2183/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 q Chief Dan George [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 0.1 2.2 p 12.5 2.1 — 2.1 2.6 Special needs (%): 31.1 2.1 2.8 Writing 2.8 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2612/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 3.4 2.1 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 83 Special needs (%): 20. level: Reading 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 47.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.7 2.4 0.5 2. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.4 2.6 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 — Math 2.4 — 8 6.0 25. level: Reading 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.8 23.0 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 12.8 3.4 F 0.8 2.9 49.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0. of $48.2 3.0 7.1 Writing 3.8 — .6 2.1 2.5 2.3 5.9 — Clairlea [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 0.1 — M 0.8 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.1 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.5 4.500: 3.5 16.4 2.5 24.5 2.5 F 0.3 9.0 24.3 9.1 3.2 4.5 — 48.4 0.4 — Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 2.3 2.600: -2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.5 29.5 F 0.7 11.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.7 — 17.1 3.8 2.7 2.1 M 0.7 3.0 Special needs (%): 3.5 — Cherokee [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.1 2. of $46. level: Reading 2.3 2.4 F 0.6 — Gr 6 avg.2 5.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0. inc.5 3. inc.9 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.7 2.3 44.7 — Tests not written (%) 7.7 2.9 2.7 2.3 3.3 F 0.2 0.2 — 7. inc.3 2.4 4.6 2.7 6.2 q 26.0 p Overall rating out of 10 5.4 5 5.

8 n/a Math n/a 3.2 3.8 3.1 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 9.4 3.1 9.2 3.1 F 0. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.3 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 8.1 2.8 2.9 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 201 Special needs (%): 10.0 2.0 — 3.1 14.2 — Writing 2.4 3.3 Writing 2.3 F 0.3 p 5.4 2.3 2.9 — Math 3.5 — F 0.4 3.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 17.9 — 1.1 3.4 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 q 8.2 2.1 9.9 22.6 2.8 — 2.3 10.0 3. of $46.0 3. inc.0 Math 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2 p 3. inc.9 3.7 2.3 7.3 q M 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.9 3.0 3.9 — Crestview [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 n/a Math n/a 3.5 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 4.4 — 6.9 2.5 3.7 3.3 Gr 6 avg. inc.5 — Tests not written (%) 11.3 2.3 7.3 — 2.4 — 9.0 — E E F 0.7 5.9 3.8 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 6. of $32.0 18.1 F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 n/a 15.200: -1.1 M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — 2.3 — .7 3.2 n/a n/a 22. inc.5 — Math 2.2 3.0 3.2 2.6 2.5 2.7 11.2 1.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 9.4 3. of $154.1 2.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.2 p 2.5 Math 2.1 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.3 F 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 n/a n/a 27. level: Reading 2.2 8.6 Writing 2.2 — E F 0.4 — 2.7 2.7 n/a n/a 60. inc.9 — 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 16.1 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 2.8 2.4 1.6 6.2 n/a E E E n/a Math M 0.2 F 0.4 2.1 3.1 3.300: 1.3 3.0 3.4 46.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.2 Math M 0.5 Math 2.5 Writing 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 5 6.1 3.600: 3.7 — Overall rating out of 10 10 9.8 Math 3.3 — Gr 6 avg.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 26.0 p 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.5 p F 0.7 8.8 8.6 — 2.2 — E F 0.1 F 0.9 2.8 25.7 2.3 Writing 3.8 — 7.7 2.3 3.9 — 3.0 22.9 3.3 3.1 — 3.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 3.3 Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.3 3.5 15.1 — F 0.600: 4.6 Math 2.8 4.0 3.4 2.9 3.4 0.7 9.9 q 10 9.3 Math 1.1 M 0.9 p Tests not written (%) 6.1 n/a F 0.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 97 Special needs (%): 21.0 0.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 21.1 3.9 Writing 2.3 3.9 2. of $35.2 3.1 — F 0.4 — 3.2 7.8 q 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0.3 3.7 2.9 — Danforth Gardens [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.2 7.3 3.1 p Math 3.2 1.1 8.9 11.0 3.6 2.4 p 2.1 3.6 7.3 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.6 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.1 3.1 3.9 26. level: Reading 2.9 q 3.1 — 3.3 0.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 30.8 2.1 n/a Cresthaven [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.2 — 2.5 2.9 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 9.7 2.0 Gr 6 avg.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.6 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.4 3.0 0.100: 0.3 — F 0. level: Reading 1.7 p 2.9 3.3 F 0.7 2.1 3.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.000: -1.7 3.9 Math 3.3 Overall rank: 25/2742 32/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 3.7 2.6 19.0 2.4 M 0.0 0.7 n/a Writing n/a 3.7 4.1 Math F 0.4 — 2.5 49.1 — 3.5 5. level: Reading 3.4 8.2 — 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 15.5 Math M 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.3 36.7 3.500: 0.3 3.9 Overall rank: 58/2742 18/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — 6.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Overall rank: 295/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2. of $222.7 2.7 Writing 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.5 q Cornell [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.0 5. of $41.4 M 0.4 9.9 2.9 2.1 E M 0.3 Writing 2.9 2.2 — 3.3 F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 0.9 q Gr 6 avg.4 3.1 2.7 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 15.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 2.4 2.2 — Writing 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 F 0.4 2.8 3.9 7.8 2.6 2.0 — Math 3.3 2.3 3.5 3.0 3.9 2.7 3.3 Math M 0.700: 4.6 Gr 6 avg.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.3 — 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 47.9 p 1.6 p 6. inc.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 147/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 34.7 2.7 2.3 M 0. inc.6 2.4 Math M 0.5 5 3.8 2.9 15. level: Reading 3.4 — 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 q Writing 3.0 — Corvette [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 13.3 20.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.7 2.0 3.6 2.2 2.2 3.3 F 0.2 47. of $41.0 3.6 — 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 68.2 3.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 10.8 2.3 19.1 n/a M 0.4 3.5 2.8 59.6 3. level: Reading 2.4 3.3 — 3.9 Writing 2.7 10.6 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 1 Dixon Grove [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 8.7 16. level: Reading n/a 2.3 2.1 Tests not written (%) 7.3 2.0 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a n/a M 0. inc.0 3. level: Reading 2.2 E — 6.1 E p 50.7 4.52 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Cliffwood [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 11.7 30.0 2.3 2.9 — Dewson Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.2 3.3 Math M 0.9 2.4 2.5 p 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2342/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.100: 2.5 63.1 Gr 6 avg.2 E n/a Math n/a n/a E M 0.0 3.9 2.8 4.2 Math 3.0 2.1 F 0.0 3. inc.8 1.8 8.6 2.5 — 10.8 2.0 — Courcelette [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.0 — Deer Park [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.1 Writing 3.0 — 10.6 Overall rating out of 10 8.2 2.8 2.0 11. level: Reading 3.3 2.2 8.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 3.0 — 2.0 5.2 3.500: -1.9 — Writing 3.8 Gr 6 avg.9 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.4 Writing 2.9 3.0 — 2.2 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.9 2.7 10.7 p D’Arcy McGee [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 5.0 3.0 9.0 8.3 Tests not written (%) 4.3 3.3 — Math 3.2 F 0.5 3.5 F 0.8 2.9 — 15.1 M 0.9 5. level: Reading 3.7 — 3.3 3.0 Special needs (%): 16. inc.2 Math 2.8 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 15.2 — 3.8 p Denlow [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 1.2 1.5 2.7 4.9 Tests not written (%) 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.9 2.6 2.1 8.2 n/a F 0.8 Writing 2.3 Tests not written (%) 0.0 2. level: Reading 3.9 2.7 Writing 2.9 2.6 — Math 2.4 8.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 18.6 6.9 2.2 — 2.1 18.8 Math 3.0 0.3 2.4 Math 3.4 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.4 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 3.0 Math 3.4 F 0.2 3.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 q Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.2 3.2 2.1 3.1 3.6 Math 2.4 2.8 q Tests not written (%) 0.6 Writing 2.1 3.1 — 3.500: 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 2.8 n/a n/a F 0.6 3.9 2.5 0.2 3.3 — Overall rating out of 10 8.5 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 73/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 19.7 4.1 M 0.5 — 2. of $50.0 Special needs (%): 22.5 F 0.5 44.1 F 0.5 2.9 3.8 Gr 6 avg.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 25.1 — F 0.1 — Writing 3.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.2 10.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.3 — Gr 6 avg.2 — M 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.9 5.8 25.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.8 3. level: Reading 1.1 M 0.9 Tests not written (%) 11.9 11. inc.7 Gr 6 avg.0 3.3 Special needs (%): 6.1 3.4 10.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 M 0.3 2.8 Math 2.5 47.3 Gr 6 avg.9 2.2 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 F 0.9 3.5 — 2.2 3.2 2.1 3.4 3.7 Math 2.5 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.1 — 2.8 3.0 2.8 — Clinton Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.5 Overall rank: 2367/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.6 Writing 3.6 2.8 3.2 M 0.6 — 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.1 10.5 2.6 6.9 6.2 2.7 — E E F 0.4 Math 2.2 M 0.3 F 0.6 2.0 — 2.8 7.1 16.6 2.6 2.8 10 10.4 3. level: Reading 2.8 3.8 q Math 3.9 — 10.0 0.6 2.1 E p 54.8 6.4 13.5 2.4 — 2.1 F 0.2 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 53.1 2.9 2. inc.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.5 36. level: Reading 3.2 2.0 3.3 q 1.6 3.2 — 32.7 2.0 Math 3.3 q Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 26.2 3.3 — 3.0 2.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2367/2742 2127/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 n/a M 0.4 7.1 3.3 M 0.2 M 0.4 — 3. level: Reading 1.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1/2742 1/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.5 18.4 3.3 3.9 3.3 3.4 2.7 2.1 2.3 11.9 — 3.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.5 — 7.4 3.1 3.5 Tests below standard (%) 20.3 3.1 q Writing 2.4 2.700: 3.4 2.9 8.7 — 2.8 5.1 — 3.1 2.8 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 M 0.0 Math 3.0 20.0 Special needs (%): 26.4 Tests not written (%) 10.9 2.9 54.9 3.8 3.0 2.7 — 3.3 E — F 0.0 2.0 Gr 6 avg. of $56.3 5.1 M 0. inc.5 Overall rating out of 10 10 Gr 6 enrollment: 82 Special needs (%): 7.6 0. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 3.3 2.5 3.6 3.6 2.0 — F 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 3.3 q 2.7 23.0 2.8 47.1 3.5 2.9 2.5 — Dallington [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 2.7 3.9 3.8 10.1 Writing 3.6 8 7.9 3.8 7.3 50. inc.300: 2.6 Writing 2.4 n/a n/a M 0.6 Special needs (%): 7.6 — 3.0 3.5 2.1 3.6 9.0 17.0 — Writing 3.4 14. level: Reading 2.2 2.2 E M 0.3 — F 0. of $47.2 Tests below standard (%) 53.8 2.600: -1.4 2.6 Math 3.3 2. inc.5 2. level: Reading 3.9 — 3.1 p 2.0 2.0 3.0 Writing 3.1 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.0 — David Lewis [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.0 Writing 3.0 p 6.3 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 7.1 — 10 8.4 — 2.3 0. of $62.4 2.2 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.0 2.7 3.4 2.1 n/a F 0.4 46.0 2.3 E n/a Math F 0.8 2.1 — M 0.4 Math 2.1 F 0.4 — 3.9 2.8 3. of $39.6 3.1 9.7 3.6 3.4 Overall rank: 511/2742 46/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.7 2.7 21.8 Writing 3. of $26.8 Writing 2.6 1.2 — 30.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 2295/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.5 2.9 — Math 3.0 3.3 3.4 2.4 32. of $142.9 3.0 Tests not written (%) 1.1 Tests below standard (%) 1.3 2.3 3.3 — Writing 2.7 Tests not written (%) 4.8 2.

of $57.2 n/a Math E F 0.4 Math 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.600: -2.0 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.8 4.1 2.3 2.2 2.8 — 3.1 — 17.2 34.9 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 27.8 — E F 0.6 8.4 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 15.8 2.1 7.3 — F 0.4 F 0.8 6.3 19.5 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 27.0 2.7 6.1 4.5 — Edgewood [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.5 q Writing 2.1 E M 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 100 Special needs (%): 52.9 — Math 3.7 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 — n/a F 0. level: Reading 3.7 Math 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 11.9 — 2.3 2.600: -4.6 2.200: 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 8.5 — Math 2.9 4.1 — Dorset Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.0 3.6 q 3.4 7. level: Reading 2.2 4.5 4.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2638/2742 2229/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 n/a M 0.4 2.0 3.9 45.2 9.6 Gr 6 avg.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.0 — Math 3.7 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 31.4 2.2 2.4 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2.2 — 2.5 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.7 2.5 M 0.5 2.8 2.8 2.0 9.5 2.5 Special needs (%): 33.8 3.5 2.6 2.8 14.0 — 2.1 8.7 3 2.000: 0.0 — F 0.5 2.3 6.2 2.3 63.9 — Math 3.1 F 0.400: 0.2 — Writing 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.0 2.8 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 2.4 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 56.8 — Dunlace [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 9.6 30.5 3. of $29.1 — 2.4 3.9 — 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 52.1 40.6 2.9 6 4.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3. of $41.8 2.6 2.0 — 3.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 43.3 — 3.200: 1.2 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 65.8 2.8 2.4 2.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4. level: Reading 2.9 12.7 2.8 20.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.1 2. of $41. of $91.2 34.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 21 Special needs (%): 19.9 48.7 2.9 2.8 2.5 2. inc.8 2.4 M 0.2 E M 0.0 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 23.9 2.4 40. level: Reading 2.1 Tests not written (%) 4.1 E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 p Writing 2.3 2.6 — 11.5 — Math 2.1 Overall rank: 2530/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 Writing 2.4 22.6 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 51.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.2 — F 0.6 — 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 26.5 — F 0.3 2.7 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.8 — Writing 2.8 41.1 44.7 3.0 2.6 2.7 2.2 q 2.6 F 0. level: Reading 2. of $30.6 2. inc.3 2.4 2.4 — 2.9 2.2 53.5 2.8 26.4 Writing 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 16.9 2.4 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a E F 0.1 — 4.5 q Gr 6 avg. inc.4 — 2.4 20. of $43.8 11. level: Reading 2. inc.9 Gr 6 avg.5 2.5 6.0 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 2.1 2.9 Writing 3.6 2.8 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 31.1 3.8 3.5 2.6 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2564/2742 2270/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — 6. of $34. level: Reading 2.4 2.8 2.0 2.7 — 11.0 10.9 14.3 n/a 57.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.4 6 5.800: -2.3 q Tests not written (%) 5.3 7.4 46.1 1.7 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 2.5 — 11.1 Tests below standard (%) 22.5 — Duke of Connaught [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 0.5 2.8 3. inc.9 2.0 — 2.9 2.2 Writing 2.7 n/a F 0.3 2.3 2.7 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — 2.9 — Writing 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 22.5 M 0.6 2.4 6.8 2.8 46.5 — Dublin Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 28.1 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.0 3.4 — 2.7 — Writing 2.1 M 0.000: -1.1 6.9 24.6 7.5 2.9 5.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Writing 2.3 7.5 1.7 2.3 2.2 F 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.4 2.6 7.5 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 9 7.7 39.3 3.0 3.0 — 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.8 Writing 2.8 2. inc.8 3.4 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.0 Math 3. level: Reading 2.1 3.2 2.8 4.0 — F 0.4 2.7 Tests not written (%) 14.7 52.3 — 17.4 Math 2.1 p Gr 6 avg. inc.2 Tests below standard (%) 20.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — 3.0 2.9 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 3.5 8.2 Gr 6 avg.2 Math 2.5 — 2.6 2.2 F 0. of $95.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 3.2 M 0.3 — 2.9 — Elizabeth Simcoe [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 0.1 2.1 F 0.5 2.4 — 3.4 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 3.9 2.4 F 0.1 F 0.400: -1.4 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 16.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 Overall rank: 511/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 49.5 q Gr 6 avg.8 3.8 2.2 1.7 2.8 16.6 2.0 35.4 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 3.2 — 2.4 Tests not written (%) 26.6 4.7 2.7 2.6 2. inc.5 — 7.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 4.0 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — Math 2.1 2.8 M 0.5 2.1 — 28.4 28.1 F 0.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 76 Special needs (%): 25.9 2.2 F 0.4 — 5.7 18.2 4.0 3.1 — East-York [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 77.0 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 — 2.4 2.0 3.1 — F 0.0 38.7 2.7 — E F 0.6 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 F 0.1 — Writing 3.7 2.4 2.7 2.3 q Overall rating out of 10 4.0 — F 0.6 2.1 2.6 — 12.5 F 0.3 2.2 F 0.1 2.5 Gr 6 avg.7 2. of $94.8 — 2.8 3.6 2.3 2.9 Math 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Writing 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.4 2.1 — 37.3 q Earl Haig [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.8 Special needs (%): 0.6 41.6 — 2.9 2.5 2.8 2.7 10.200: 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.1 F 0.9 Writing 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.1 Math M 0.3 n/a M 0.7 2.6 — Writing 2.5 n/a n/a M 0. inc.5 2.1 F 0.7 10.5 2.9 Math 2.7 20.5 n/a Elmbank [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.2 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 M 0. level: Reading 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.6 5. level: Reading 2.4 3.4 2.0 — 3.1 3.5 — 2.6 — Dovercourt [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 9.9 2.2 2.4 2.7 q 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 Writing 2.3 Writing 2.4 2.5 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.4 Math 3.3 q Math 2.2 F 0.1 3.7 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 5.7 2.2 2.2 2.3 — 2.7 3.2 2.4 8.7 2. of $73.6 2.5 2.5 Gr 6 avg.1 n/a n/a n/a 35.9 2.0 Gr 6 avg.9 q 15.3 44.8 2.7 51.9 8.8 2.3 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.1 2.1 3.5 Writing 2.4 2.6 — 2.2 5.1 52.8 7.9 — 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 Writing 2.4 1. inc.5 Tests not written (%) 0. inc.5 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.1 p E F 0.4 2. of $32.4 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 F 0.7 Math 2.5 — 2. of $41.8 2. inc.4 2.7 2.2 — Math M 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0.9 Eastview [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 n/a F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 7.3 — 7 8.1 2.3 Overall rank: 2311/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.5 2.8 3.5 4.2 — 3.0 2.7 2.2 3.4 55.7 2.4 2.800: -1.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 F 0.6 2.7 — 3.5 F 0.5 2.1 Overall rank: 2035/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 4.6 2.6 2.6 3.1 42.5 2.4 q .6 2.7 p Writing 2.1 — 42.4 2.2 56.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 42.7 2.6 4.3 13. level: Reading 2.5 12.8 Math 3.2 p 2.8 6.2 Tests not written (%) 2.3 16.8 2.0 2.7 2.5 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.1 3. level: Reading 2. of $78.1 Math M 0.5 Math 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — 7.5 2.0 3.3 Math F 0.3 2.0 Writing 2.1 8.5 Tests not written (%) 3.4 14.1 5.7 2.1 8.1 2.9 5 4.0 8.3 7. level: Reading 2.3 — 2.4 54.6 2.7 — 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 q 53.3 Writing 2.6 2.3 — 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.2 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — Earl Beatty [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.2 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 53 Donwood Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 15.0 — 2.6 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 24.3 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.5 2.7 2.9 — Eglinton [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 8.6 2.4 4.1 11.8 6.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2717/2742 2255/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.6 29.5 2.9 — 2.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.1 — Ellesmere-Statton [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 0.300: 1.3 2.9 2.1 3.8 5.5 — 2.4 Writing 2. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 9.0 Special needs (%): 20.5 2.6 2.0 3.5 Math 3.8 6.9 3.4 8.6 — 2.5 Math 2.300: -2.4 2.3 Writing 2.6 F 0.6 2.4 Math 2.5 2.0 3.6 6.2 14.4 Tests not written (%) 5.0 5.0 Special needs (%): 9.4 Gr 6 avg.8 9.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — Tests not written (%) 7. level: Reading 1.1 11.4 F 0.5 2.2 2.6 2.6 36.6 6.4 Writing 2.5 Tests not written (%) 11.5 2.2 F 0.6 26.6 F 0.2 57.1 2.0 3.0 2.9 — F 0.9 Math 3.1 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.4 2.7 31.2 — M 0.300: 0.6 2.8 — Math 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 — 2.5 q 2.6 2.7 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 44.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 3.1 q 5.2 2.1 F 0.8 2.5 2.8 Tests not written (%) 1.4 2.6 Gr 6 avg.1 — 22.2 F 0.4 Overall rank: 186/2742 177/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 Tests below standard (%) 28.7 2.4 27.4 — Math 2.5 3.0 2.4 2.1 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 3.6 Math 3.4 2.1 n/a E M 0.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 3.1 F 0.8 2.2 4.9 2.5 Math F 0.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.6 — Math 3.0 3.1 F 0.9 3.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5 4.8 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.3 — M 0.3 51.7 — 2.4 M 0.8 — 3. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2183/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 E n/a n/a n/a 18.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.7 2.9 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — Writing 2.4 Math 2.4 — 2.

3 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 F 0.9 — Félix-Leclerc [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 93.8 2.3 F 0.4 — .8 q 3.0 2.3 25.3 15.6 2.2 F 0.8 2.7 2.9 2.500: 0.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 — 22.0 Tests not written (%) 7.7 Math 2.2 F 0.2 — Math 2.7 q Math 3.8 2.7 6. of $30.3 8 8.9 — Math 2.0 2.2 — 16.8 2.9 — 3. level: Reading 2.9 Writing 3.3 2.0 2.9 — 3.8 2.8 — 3.9 4.7 2.4 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.9 n/a Math 2.0 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 15.8 2.3 0.8 Math 2.9 30.0 2.7 24.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.8 3.5 2.1 2.8 Special needs (%): 0.8 Gr 6 avg.3 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 26.1 0.5 n/a Gabrielle-Roy [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 94.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 19.3 Writing 3.1 — Writing 2.3 3.6 2. of $47.9 Writing 2.9 3.000: -0.7 6.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 35.3 24.4 — 6.4 — Forest Manor [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 39.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Math 3.6 2.1 n/a n/a n/a 37.6 2.4 2.1 p 8.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.8 2.9 7.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 M 0.3 F 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 6.6 3.4 F 0.3 54.2 Tests below standard (%) 21.6 Math 2.8 2.4 Writing 2.6 59.3 7.7 3.1 8.8 2.0 4.1 3.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 F 0.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 76 Special needs (%): 5.6 5.5 2.4 2.9 2.0 7.8 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 30.9 p 3.6 Writing 2.7 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 39.5 3.9 3.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 8.1 F 0.9 9.4 30.0 3.100: 0.5 2.3 5.7 2.8 2. of $211.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 3.5 1.4 7.4 5.0 3.5 Writing 2.3 3.6 — 2.0 1.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — 3.8 2.4 9.7 3. level: Reading 2.9 3.3 2.0 2. inc. inc.1 M 0.2 — Math 3.9 8.7 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 n/a 2.7 2.1 3.1 11.9 — 2.9 2.500: 1.8 2.0 — 3.2 Tests not written (%) 1.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2. of $90.6 2.3 Math F 0.9 1.6 2.2 M 0.0 — 2.1 Gr 6 avg.0 — 8. level: Reading 3.5 9 8.6 2. inc.4 2. level: Reading 2. of $202. level: Reading 3.2 E F 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 39. of $76.2 3.4 2.8 3.900: 1.4 15.6 Writing 2.4 F 0.9 F 0.1 3.9 2.9 3.7 — Writing 2.5 2.300: 1.0 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 3.8 3.3 6.7 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.4 M 0.1 2. of $132.8 3.1 F 0.7 2.1 3.4 Tests below standard (%) 12.1 2.1 — Writing 2. inc.8 2.9 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 1.8 0.9 Tests not written (%) 4.6 — Forest Hill [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.5 5.7 3.3 — F 0.7 7.1 — M 0.5 2.6 2.9 Tests not written (%) 6.7 3.4 8.9 Tests not written (%) 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.1 E E E — 16. inc.4 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.9 — 2.3 2.0 3.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 87 Special needs (%): 19.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $35.2 M 0.1 — M 0.2 F 0.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.6 — 2.3 — F 0.0 2.2 M 0.3 3.9 2.5 42.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.9 8.6 15.7 2.9 1.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 29.1 — 5.2 3.0 3.8 1.4 q M 0.8 28.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 39. level: Reading 2.2 3.7 — F 0.5 2.2 2.1 3.600: 3.8 3.4 20.6 43.0 29.7 3.9 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.1 Writing 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.6 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.0 3.8 2.1 F 0.0 2.0 9.8 — 10.6 3.0 3.2 Writing 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.3 — 3.2 F 0.2 3.3 33. level: Reading 2. inc.6 2.5 6.4 n/a 2.9 q 1. level: Reading 2.2 3.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 11.0 4.1 Math 3.9 3.3 3.4 Tests not written (%) 15.2 3.1 p 2.4 0.8 2.1 Math M 0.8 3.2 Math F 0.9 8.6 q 2.0 0.7 35.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 — 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 p Fern Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.7 2.9 Math 2.6 7.5 q Faywood Arts [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.0 — 2.2 2.4 2.1 — Epiphany of our Lord [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 4.2 2.4 Math 2.8 Math 2.2 — F 0.2 E F 0.6 — E E F 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.8 — Ernest [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 2.6 41.1 — 3.3 1.1 4.1 2.0 Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 2.3 3.9 2.600: -1.7 2.1 Math 3.5 q n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 20.4 — 6.2 n/a 6.8 2.6 23.3 Overall rating out of 10 9.7 Writing 2.8 2.2 2.9 2.9 — 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.4 3.3 n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 Math 2. inc.4 7.0 0. inc.4 — 12.3 q Gr 6 avg.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 40.3 M 0.8 Writing 2.0 Writing 3.9 3.7 7.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.2 n/a n/a 49.0 — Fleming [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. inc.6 2.300: 3. inc.800: 1.1 5. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 Math 2. inc. of $109.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.0 3.0 2.8 19.2 — 2.9 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.0 — F 0.7 2.6 27.8 — 4 5 6.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.2 Tests below standard (%) 16.2 F 0.5 6.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 2.4 — Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a 4.3 3.9 5.6 2.3 E F 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 Gr 6 avg.1 — 30.9 1.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — 3.700: 1.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 5.4 — 9.2 18.6 18.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 9.5 2.8 — Math 2.0 n/a Father Serra [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 12.9 2.0 2.0 — 2.1 Math M 0.7 2.2 — F 0.1 2.8 2.2 — F 0.6 — Frankland [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 3.1 3. level: Reading 3.6 5.2 M 0.7 2.1 3.0 — 5.0 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.5 3.2 n/a n/a F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2. inc.6 3.5 — Tests not written (%) 9.9 n/a Writing 2.8 2.8 — 33.7 5.9 — 2.5 2.4 — 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.5 1.7 2.7 2.7 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 — 13.3 2.0 2.1 6.1 M 0.6 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 16.3 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests not written (%) 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 3.8 2.8 34. level: Reading 2.2 2.3 F 0.2 4.7 2.8 — Writing 2.2 3.8 — 2.1 — 3.1 2.5 F 0.7 2.3 Tests not written (%) 20.7 0. of $49.0 2.1 6.7 Math 2.2 6.7 Writing 2.8 2.9 3.200: -0.600: 1.8 3. level: Reading 2.1 Math F 0.8 2.7 — 2.1 — 3.3 F 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 8.3 26.8 Writing 2.6 n/a 2.4 0.0 3.9 2.9 Math 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 3.5 2.5 Special needs (%): 36.8 2.8 2.9 — 3.0 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 40. of $45.7 — 2.5 32. level: Reading 3.0 3.7 Gr 6 avg.7 — 2.9 10.3 2.9 2.9 — Writing 3.7 10.8 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 2.7 — 2.8 Writing 3.3 q E M 0.000: 0.8 — 8 6.2 2.0 p 4.6 — 0. level: Reading 2.6 1.9 2.7 2.6 29.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 49.9 Gr 6 avg.1 14.1 3.2 — 4.1 Math 3.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 4.1 M 0.7 q 3.7 2. inc.0 3.0 2.8 Math 3.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 2.9 1.7 7.3 n/a 30.7 2.3 24.7 — 2.3 36.4 q Writing 2.6 22.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 Writing 2.5 2.8 2.9 4.7 2.5 5.1 Overall rank: 1038/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.7 Overall rank: 86/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Writing 2.2 3.2 F 0.3 1.1 F 0.7 — 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.0 — F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 11.1 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 28. level: Reading 3.9 2.2 1.1 F 0.7 n/a Math 2.1 9.8 2.8 — Fairmount [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 3.2 — 2.4 — F 0.3 p 2.9 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 3.9 2. level: Reading 3.6 9.5 2.6 n/a 2.7 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 14.7 2.0 — Fairglen [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 4. of $52.2 3.8 15.4 5.8 2.8 2.800: -0.3 n/a 2.4 Gr 6 avg.1 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rank: 1723/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.54 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Emily Carr [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 0.6 n/a Tests not written (%) 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 p 2.4 Overall rank: 2226/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.3 31. of $44.8 31.9 2. of $63.1 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 3.1 — Math M 0.0 31.5 — 2.0 17.0 — 7.6 2.7 3.8 — 2.7 2.8 2.1 2.7 2.8 0. level: Reading 2.9 3.7 Gr 6 avg.8 3.6 — 2.0 23.4 n/a 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 7.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.3 — 7.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.8 1.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 86/2742 73/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 p 4.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.3 5.9 2.6 5.5 — F 0.7 2.8 3.9 2.4 E F 0.2 25.6 7.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.7 2. inc.3 3.0 — 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.7 — 2.6 — Essex [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 13.2 Math 3.6 5.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 37.1 M 0.8 3.9 — 2.6 2.4 Overall rank: 902/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Tests not written (%) 6.0 Writing 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 32. inc.2 Math 3.7 2.8 — 7.8 2.7 2.7 q 2.9 — 3.3 3.7 F 0.9 Writing 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Math 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 M 0.9 3.8 Math 3.2 M 0.0 Special needs (%): 30.6 Writing 2.3 — 3.0 1.1 3.5 n/a Math n/a n/a E F 0.9 6.6 2.1 E — 10.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0. of $40.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.5 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.9 2.1 — 3.4 9.5 Math 2.6 n/a Writing 2.0 24.

0 2.1 25.1 n/a n/a M 0.3 — 2.0 — 5.6 Math 2.9 p 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 3.9 n/a 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 7.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.9 3.9 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 Gr 6 avg.1 — 2.0 9.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 20.6 — 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 2.4 2. of $45.6 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 2.8 — Writing 2.0 2.7 2. of $82.1 Tests not written (%) 11.2 7.0 Special needs (%): 15.4 — Gledhill [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.6 2.3 n/a F 0.5 3.6 Writing 2.7 24.6 5.3 3.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3. inc.1 3.4 2.1 3.2 n/a F 0.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 11.4 1. level: Reading 2.6 — 18.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 21.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.6 2.0 Tests not written (%) 6.3 Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 — 2.1 6.2 3.6 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 44.1 0.2 M 0.1 8.8 Writing 2.2 6.7 4.5 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 15.5 6.4 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 13.7 2.2 Writing 2.8 2.8 — 2.5 2.6 Writing 2.0 2.1 — 2.8 2.5 3.6 — Writing 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) 6.2 M 0.6 — 2.7 2.0 31.8 1.6 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.8 3.2 2.7 — 2.1 n/a n/a n/a 28.8 59.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2686/2742 2204/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2.8 n/a George P Mackie [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 0.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 Overall rank: 166/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.7 p Writing 2.2 3.5 2.4 Math 2.4 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.7 3. level: Reading 2.2 Greenholme [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 5.0 60.2 E M 0.1 2.9 n/a 2.7 2.8 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.5 1.6 4.6 2.3 n/a George B Little [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.8 5.6 2.7 — 2.7 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 32.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 26.600: -2.2 Writing 2.0 17.8 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Writing 2.5 2. inc.5 — 2.4 2.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.500: -0.1 — 51.9 5.1 18.7 — 2.9 3.7 3.3 3.5 Overall rank: 396/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.1 14.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.6 Tests not written (%) 10.5 30.1 — 3.9 3.1 — Glamorgan [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 3.6 3.9 — 2.900: 1.7 — 2.9 19.6 2.8 3.5 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 2.0 Special needs (%): 19.1 2.2 41.2 30.9 3.6 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 46.8 Gr 6 avg.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.6 Math 2.0 29.0 — 3.4 3.5 2.5 2.4 3.2 — 2.3 2.8 2.200: 2.5 2.2 2.6 3.7 2.5 2.4 p 2.5 44.0 p n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 41.3 n/a 8 7. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.1 — E E F 0.100: 1.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 6.9 Math 2. of $49.8 n/a Writing 2.1 2.8 — 3.3 Overall rank: 2651/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — Math 2.8 Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 Tests not written (%) 7.1 3.6 2.6 — 2.3 2. of $78.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.7 32.9 5.9 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $36.8 Math 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.8 2. inc.9 4.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 q M 0.6 Writing 2.5 — 2.8 2.0 8.8 2.7 — 2.0 — 2.3 2.8 — 2.5 — 15.3 2.2 F 0.0 2.2 3.6 2.8 6.6 Gr 6 avg.9 2.3 12.3 2.8 2.4 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2612/2742 2284/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.100: -3.2 Math M 0.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 — 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.0 — 4.8 2. inc.1 4.7 2.4 2.1 3.3 Math 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 54.3 16.9 Math 3.2 2.5 2.9 7.7 2.5 2.0 22.5 2.5 n/a Math E n/a F 0.9 Math 3.0 3.7 — .8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — 2.3 — 2.3 M 0.1 p 2.9 2.9 — 2.9 6.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2. inc.5 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 8.0 Overall rank: 667/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.0 2.600: 1.5 2.0 3.2 Writing 2.5 33.8 2.1 E — M 0.8 Math 2.4 2.1 — Math 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 30.6 2.6 F 0.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 1.9 9.6 2.1 39.6 2.5 2.1 — 2.300: 0.8 21.1 3.8 — 2.5 Gr 6 avg. of $43.7 2.0 — 12.300: 3.3 — F 0.2 — 12.2 7.3 — Overall rating out of 10 4.4 2.2 — Golf Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 2.0 — 2.6 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.3 F 0.3 — 18.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.6 7.1 6.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 11.4 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 3.8 Writing 2.5 2.900: 1.7 1.3 Math M 0.9 27.6 Math 2.7 3.3 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 n/a Writing 2.7 n/a Math 2.9 2.0 Tests not written (%) 17.8 3.8 2.8 2.5 2.4 10.1 Math M 0. inc. level: Reading 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.3 q F 0.9 2.9 n/a Math 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 F 0.7 3.500: -0.3 48.1 22.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 28.6 2.3 M 0.3 7. level: Reading 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 28.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — Garden Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.7 2.5 Math 2.6 2.9 3.0 3. level: Reading 2.5 2. inc.8 — 2.2 22.7 Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 2.5 2.4 Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 50.0 2.0 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 21.2 3.7 — Georges-Étienne-Cartier [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.7 2.9 2.2 — 28.0 2.2 22.0 15.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.5 32.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.600: 1.9 2.9 3.8 2. of $28. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. of $42.5 — Writing 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.9 Writing 2.2 — n/a E F 0.3 7.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 37.3 2.4 2.9 3.0 2.4 8.5 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.5 4.9 35.6 Writing 2.0 2.7 2.2 7.7 3.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.3 Math 2.1 2.4 — 2.9 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.8 2. inc.8 Overall rank: 2122/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.4 2.4 28.1 — 5.9 4.6 — 6.3 2.4 2.6 7.9 n/a 3.9 Math 2. of $55.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 10. level: Reading 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 48.4 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — 11.8 3. level: Reading 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.0 2.6 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 7.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.7 57.3 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 1.9 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4. of $58.0 2.5 25.2 n/a 16.9 27.2 16.5 8.2 31.8 — 2.3 3.6 n/a Tests below standard (%) 48.900: 1.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 13.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 53/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.2 — Tests not written (%) 9.8 n/a 2.7 q 19.8 — Math 3.5 — F 0.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — 2.3 2.3 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2. of $49.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.0 — Math 2. of $26.8 7.7 2.5 Math 2.3 3. level: Reading 2.8 — 15.0 3.1 — 2.0 3.6 3.8 2.4 n/a 41.2 F 0. inc.6 Special needs (%): 35.1 — Writing 3.0 — n/a M 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 — General Crerar [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.3 Writing 2.8 — 2.0 Special needs (%): 40.0 3.6 q 6.9 — Givins/Shaw [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 Tests below standard (%) 43.5 2.5 2.8 3.6 9.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 19 Special needs (%): 31.1 1.3 2.3 25.5 M 0.1 2.1 M 0.4 2. level: Reading 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 p Tests not written (%) 7.7 n/a F 0.8 3.8 — Math 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.6 Math 2.6 Writing 2.5 7.7 q 4.4 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.7 2.2 M 0.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 15.4 — General Mercer [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.6 2.1 4.7 36.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 0.9 Writing 2.600: -0.7 23.0 59.7 2.8 3.2 — 2.1 n/a 5.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — 2.1 40.3 27.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 q 4.7 2.5 2.3 2.6 14.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 38.1 Tests below standard (%) 22.1 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 1.9 n/a 3.8 3.4 2.4 28.7 — 2. inc.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 39.4 F 0.6 n/a Glen Ravine [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 2.6 — 2.7 n/a 3.7 — George Peck [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 0.7 2.3 2.7 5.7 2. inc.6 2.7 42.7 2.4 M 0.9 2.7 2.6 4.8 2.8 0.3 E — M 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2.3 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 Writing 2.8 6.6 Math 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.1 3.0 3.6 14.9 52.4 2.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 55 Galloway Road [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 3.2 — 37.3 Special needs (%): 20.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 — 36.2 — 2.9 — F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.6 2.0 Tests not written (%) 11.5 2.6 Math 2.5 3.7 3.1 — Writing 2.8 — 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.6 2.8 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 67.5 2.3 27.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.6 0.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — 2.4 2.0 3.9 2.7 Tests not written (%) 7.7 Writing 2.3 Tests not written (%) 12.6 2.5 — 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 58.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.9 — E E F 0.3 M 0.8 q General Brock [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 2.8 — 2. of $88.5 2.700: -3.8 3.4 2.2 7.0 0.3 6.5 49.6 2.2 — 13.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 44.3 2.7 34.5 2.9 2.1 12. of $72. inc.1 F 0.5 2. of $45.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 F 0.9 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.

8 Writing 2.7 8.7 2.8 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.2 — 11.6 2.2 5.3 Math M 0.8 2.7 q Tests not written (%) 0.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 1.5 2.7 2.6 — 3.4 0.5 2.5 2.4 M 0.8 2.000: 2.4 q 4. inc.7 Writing 2. of $60.9 2.3 17.7 2.3 0.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5 5.3 25.1 3. of $99.1 n/a Math F 0.0 — Math 3.6 2.3 41.6 2.5 Math 2.0 q Heather Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 p Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.6 2.3 n/a M 0.8 — 6 4.6 q 2.8 2.8 34. level: Reading 3.0 — 2.8 3.7 36.5 2.4 Overall rank: 667/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 11.3 Tests below standard (%) 54.4 2. of $108.2 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.8 25.7 2.7 2.2 3.4 2.8 3.9 7.6 2. of $148.3 3.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42. level: Reading 2. of $54.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 23. inc. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.5 3.8 5.8 2.9 Gr 6 avg.5 2.6 2.2 — E M 0.7 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6 7.1 Tests below standard (%) 32.4 3.6 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 Math 2.6 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.1 3.4 H A Halbert [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 2.2 3.2 — 2.5 2.6 n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 Math 2.5 18.1 p 2.9 2.1 3.5 2.400: 1. level: Reading 2.1 3.5 2.8 — 2.7 2.8 — Hawthorne II Bilingual Alternative [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.1 2.4 F 0.7 3. level: Reading 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.3 3.5 Math M 0.9 2.5 2.6 q 3.5 — 2.7 2.1 n/a n/a Math n/a M 0.3 F 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.8 3.6 2.5 42.8 2.7 7.7 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 13.6 2.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.4 30.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.5 — Holy Angels [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 2.9 2.200: -0.1 — 2.5 q 3.0 3.1 F 0.8 0.0 — 2.3 F 0.4 q 3.3 — Tests not written (%) 15.3 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 13. inc.1 Overall rank: 573/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 5.5 2.8 Writing 2. inc.0 3.8 2.9 2.0 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.5 — n/a F 0.5 Writing 2.4 1.9 Math 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 E — 23.1 3.2 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 39.6 — 2.700: 2.9 3.5 2.5 2.0 Math 1.3 Tests below standard (%) 47.4 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.1 Writing 2.7 2.0 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 7.400: -3.6 3.1 F 0.1 5.5 13.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 n/a F 0.2 n/a Highland Creek [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.8 Math 2.6 5.7 2. level: Reading 3.6 3.4 4.8 3.2 Overall rank: 147/2742 24/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 — 2.7 — 2.7 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.1 3.3 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.2 p F 0.3 3.2 Overall rank: 2677/2742 2153/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 31.1 46.7 — 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.5 Tests not written (%) 0.4 3.5 — Writing 2.4 — Hillmount [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 25.4 2.1 p Highland Heights [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.1 28.1 — Math 2.5 59.8 Math 3.0 22.6 2.4 p Hillcrest [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 Math 2.3 — Heron Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.4 3.8 10.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 27.8 2.6 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 2.2 — 8.1 2.0 Special needs (%): 10.5 5.2 3.1 p Writing 2. inc.1 — Gr 6 avg. of $61. of $60.6 2.2 E n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.6 2.7 33.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.200: 2.5 2.7 2. inc.8 2.7 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.6 7.0 p 2.6 p Math 3.7 — F 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 — 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 9.0 — Harrison [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.0 2.1 n/a Guildwood [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2342/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.6 Writing 2.8 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 Tests not written (%) 2.4 Gr 6 avg.4 2.7 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.0 — 5.3 2.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.300: -3.5 n/a n/a n/a M 0.100: -1.0 Gr 6 avg.6 — 2. of $34.4 F 0.7 7.5 2.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 4.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 Tests not written (%) 10.2 6.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 35.2 — 27.9 Gr 6 avg.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 Overall rank: 1/2742 5/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.0 0.3 n/a n/a n/a 15.8 2.7 Special needs (%): 5.7 57.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.600: 1.6 Tests not written (%) 1.1 3.8 3.3 F 0.0 2.6 11.1 10 9.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.6 p 1.9 3.9 — 3.2 F 0. inc. inc.5 2.5 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.5 M 0.8 3.7 47. level: Reading 2.2 — 2.4 Writing 2.6 2.2 M 0.0 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 25.5 2.6 5.6 3.9 — Math 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.6 Overall rank: 78/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 9.1 F 0.3 3.6 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 Math 2.7 — 10.3 2.8 2.1 3.200: 1.1 6.1 — Writing 2.6 3.8 4.6 33.6 — 2.6 2. inc.7 15.1 3. of $56.4 p Gr 6 avg.9 — 5.3 3.0 2.5 Tests not written (%) 5.3 p Overall rating out of 10 10 10 9.8 2.5 2.7 q 2. level: Reading 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.3 Writing 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 8.3 2.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.0 30.3 6.0 38. of $50.2 p F 0. level: Reading 2.0 1.3 3.1 21.7 2.4 Writing 3.800: 2.7 2.7 6. level: Reading 3.6 Writing 2.8 — 3.9 p 2.8 Math 3.8 2.1 F 0.7 2.2 2.6 — Math 3.5 0.5 2.9 Tests not written (%) 14.3 22.8 2.0 15.3 q Math 2.5 2.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.0 3.1 Tests not written (%) 14.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 20.6 7.5 — 2. inc.6 2.200: 4.6 — Writing 2.0 9.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 — 6.0 3.1 3.6 2.0 3.0 3.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.3 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 p 3.8 p 2.8 2.2 29.5 3.9 1.9 2.6 Math 2.7 2.1 F 0.2 10.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 1.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.2 n/a 29.9 2.7 13.6 7.8 Writing 2.6 — 4.6 28.6 4.3 3.4 n/a Heritage Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 M 0. inc.8 q Writing 3.1 9.0 3.2 5.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.4 2.7 2.4 n/a 44.5 — 2.1 — F 0.1 — 2.9 2.6 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 17.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 37.2 3.1 — . level: Reading 2. of $51.8 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.3 2.0 Tests not written (%) 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.5 30.4 — 2.2 53.7 Writing 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 — 2.5 2.1 F 0.4 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 6.3 F 0.1 Math 1.1 3.7 Gr 6 avg.4 Math 2.9 Gr 6 avg.7 — Writing 2.3 Writing 2.5 2. level: Reading 1.3 n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 Gr 6 avg.5 E F 0.1 3.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 2.9 7.6 3.7 2.1 n/a n/a 68.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 p 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $35.0 — 7.1 3.6 21.5 2.3 2.5 3.3 3.3 34.3 2. level: Reading 2.7 — F 0.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2638/2742 2308/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.5 0. of $69.9 6.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 9.5 — 7 7. of $29.3 3.3 3.5 22.4 7.6 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 Math 2.7 22.2 5.1 1.9 3.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 0.1 3.1 n/a n/a M 0.2 Gr 6 avg.2 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 — Writing 3.8 q 2.9 — Math 3.1 E n/a n/a n/a 28.9 2.4 2.0 q Gulfstream [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 0.7 2. inc.6 Math F 0.4 F 0.6 9.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.3 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.1 2.5 3.9 3.7 5.6 — Tests not written (%) 16.8 2.2 22.6 2.7 3.3 M 0.4 3.4 Writing 2.4 4.2 3.7 3.8 47.8 2.7 19.1 2.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 75.0 1.9 2.4 F 0.1 2.6 9.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 28.6 8.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 21.8 — 2.300: 1.9 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 3.0 56.56 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Grey Owl [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 2.6 2.8 2. level: Reading 3.3 2. level: Reading 2.1 8.6 2.5 — Writing 3.4 2.1 — F 0.6 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 0 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 41.9 2.2 Math 3.3 3.4 Math F 0.9 — 0. level: Reading 2.5 — 2.9 6.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.7 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 3.8 2.6 2.5 4.0 Special needs (%): 51.4 — F 0.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.0 0. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 3.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 3.5 q Math 2.7 q Highcastle [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.2 E F 0. of $47.8 7.0 — 1.6 3.9 2.6 Special needs (%): 21.600: -1.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 9.2 — 2.8 3.7 2.400: -0.4 3. inc.9 2.1 23.5 2.2 3.1 2.1 2.0 2.5 10.1 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math 2.2 n/a n/a n/a 39.3 3.5 — n/a F 0. level: Reading 3.1 F 0.5 2.8 5.4 6.9 3.6 2.4 3.5 q 2.7 2.2 3.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 M 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 8.9 2.1 q 15.1 Overall rank: 295/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.4 p Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.4 — 2.8 41.6 2.8 4.7 2.0 2.7 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 7.1 F 0.9 1.1 3.

5 2.8 2. of $51.900: 1. of $119.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 n/a 26.5 F 0.0 — 2.7 Math 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.8 42.2 — F 0. inc.9 2.7 2.0 3.6 2.9 — 2.7 2.9 1.5 F 0.2 3.1 — Math E F 0.5 2. of $35.9 — 2.0 — 3.6 17.1 2.6 1.1 M 0.7 2.6 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.1 4.1 — Tests below standard (%) 46.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 22.8 2.8 34.4 26.8 — F 0.7 2. inc.4 2.8 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 31.1 M 0.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 F 0.9 — Writing 2.2 — Holy Name [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 68 Special needs (%): 10.4 M 0. level: Reading 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $137.3 Writing 2.0 3.3 2.9 2.6 6.1 Math F 0.8 2.7 2.6 — n/a F 0.7 2.3 F 0.4 6.5 6.5 7. level: Reading 3. inc.8 4.8 2.8 2.3 E F 0.5 2.7 3.9 2.0 4.3 2. of $62.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 57.8 Gr 6 avg.7 Special needs (%): 19.2 2.9 4.8 2.7 — 2.2 2.1 21.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.1 n/a n/a 27.6 Tests not written (%) 13.6 36.4 2.7 — 2.9 2.5 — Writing 2.700: 0.7 2.2 n/a F 0.4 2.8 2.2 2.7 2.3 n/a E F 0.7 2.2 2.3 — Huron Street [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 0.9 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 42.9 Writing 2.6 8 8.8 2.0 2.9 — 2.0 — Writing 2.8 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 3.7 33.3 40.2 n/a 45.5 — Holy Spirit [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 15.7 2.9 5.8 29.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 7.000: 0.1 19.6 2.2 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.5 2.8 1.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.5 3.9 30.0 — 6.4 7.7 Special needs (%): 10.1 n/a M 0.3 E — Math E E E M 0. inc.9 39.5 2.0 2.4 — Writing 2.1 n/a F 0.2 3.1 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 5.8 5.900: 3.9 2.5 2.2 5.7 Math 2.8 2. inc.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — 2.9 — Writing 3.3 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.700: 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 7.8 2.3 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.5 6. inc. inc.3 0.3 3.7 2.9 3.7 25.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3.2 2.4 9.4 9.8 2.3 E F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — 2.9 3.0 0.8 2.6 — 5. level: Reading 2.0 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 18.5 2.0 Math 2.8 2.7 2.9 — 10.4 2.0 Writing 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 3.7 2.1 3.0 11.2 2.6 2.6 2.0 1.9 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 14.8 — F 0.6 Writing 2.6 2.6 2.9 7.8 Writing 3.4 6.1 Math M 0.1 Gr 6 avg.3 M 0.8 2.7 Tests not written (%) 6.8 13.7 Writing 2.1 F 0.7 2.9 p Gr 6 avg.7 — 7.9 Math 2.8 6.8 Gr 6 avg.1 n/a E M 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $36.0 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 1.0 3.2 p 5.3 15.100: 0.7 3.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 27.9 — Math 2.4 2.7 — F 0.9 — 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 14.4 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 q 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.4 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests not written (%) 11.8 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 p Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — Math 3.8 4.7 3.9 q 2.4 F 0.8 14.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.0 3.8 — 2.7 2.6 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 58.8 p 3. level: Reading 3.8 q 2.8 Writing 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 22.9 3.9 2.5 8.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.8 2.8 2.1 n/a F 0.7 Math 2.8 — F 0.7 2.6 2.7 Overall rank: 2146/2742 2083/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.300: 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 7.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — 2.6 2.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 37. inc.5 2.0 43.1 Tests not written (%) 7.7 19.9 2.7 — 2.6 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.5 7 5 6.7 2.0 2.3 2.3 n/a Math M 0.1 35.8 — 2.9 — 2.7 4.0 3.0 — Math 3.5 4.1 2.1 7.3 Math 2.3 7.6 — 6.0 Special needs (%): 7. inc.6 2.2 F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 M 0.0 6.0 2.8 Writing 2.8 49.2 15.1 3.4 36.6 q 3.3 4.6 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.1 — 2.0 18.0 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.5 2.3 26.5 2.7 — 2. of $48.0 Special needs (%): 29.6 2.0 2.1 — 29.2 q 13.3 2.9 — 2.7 7.9 2.100: -0.8 3.0 3. level: Reading 3.9 — 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.7 Math 2.7 0.0 42.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Math 2.1 6.5 2.1 n/a 34.8 Math 3.7 2.0 2.8 2.400: 1.3 6.600: 1.7 2.6 F 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — 4. level: Reading 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.5 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.6 2.1 6.3 Tests below standard (%) 22.7 22.4 2.7 3.4 2.3 E n/a n/a F 0.0 3.1 10.6 — 2.1 F 0.4 2.8 2.6 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.700: 0.9 3. inc.3 2.5 2.1 2.2 — Howard [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 7.4 8.8 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 n/a n/a E E M 0.1 2.5 2.6 5.5 — Hunter’s Glen [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 2.7 Writing 2.3 p Holy Family [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 18. inc.0 p Math 2.1 p F 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 6.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 n/a n/a F 0.6 4.5 2.8 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2.2 5.5 F 0.9 47.5 — 16.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 2.1 3.3 F 0.6 2.6 1.0 Overall rank: 235/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.0 — 7.2 E M 0.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3.2 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 16.9 2. of $42.7 Writing 2.0 Tests not written (%) 12.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 n/a n/a Math F 0.5 2. inc.6 — Overall rating out of 10 8.5 — F 0.9 2.9 3.6 6.7 2.3 F 0.6 2.0 2.0 — 2.3 F 0.3 6. level: Reading 2.5 2.5 2.5 Math 2.0 3.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 15.6 19.4 3.3 — Writing 2.8 2.6 2.1 3.7 3.6 7.3 2.1 Writing 2.1 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.5 — Humberwood Downs [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 117 ESL (%): 1.2 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 Special needs (%): 12.8 3.7 p Tests not written (%) 4.8 52. level: Reading 2.0 39.900: 0.5 3.9 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.7 — 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.4 — Writing 2.2 M 0.6 2.4 2.5 2.3 7.0 Overall rank: 623/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Tests not written (%) 0.9 2.3 n/a F 0.4 2.2 2.6 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 p 7. level: Reading 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 3.2 n/a F 0.8 2.5 7.0 — Writing 2.8 2.7 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 29. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 q 7.0 p Math 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 Gr 6 avg.8 3.1 3.6 Writing 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 avg.0 — 2.6 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 Writing 2.8 8.6 2.7 2.6 E n/a F 0.6 p Immaculate Heart of Mary [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 6.2 2.8 3.7 34.2 n/a F 0.6 2.9 p Math 2. of $42.6 — 2.8 p Math 2.8 2.7 — 3.2 n/a 23.5 27.4 8.1 n/a F 0.9 — 2.1 Gr 6 avg.8 2.3 2.9 Math 3. of $188.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $53.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 7.9 3.6 Writing 2.0 3.8 2.9 3.7 2.2 2.8 Tests not written (%) 2.0 — Math 3.5 2.2 F 0.5 F 0.9 3.1 3.300: 0.7 2.1 F 0.4 10.7 2.5 Math 3.7 2.3 Writing 2.5 2.8 2.1 1.3 14.7 — Tests not written (%) 3.5 — Math M 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 12.0 26.9 3.4 Special needs (%): 16. level: Reading 2.9 3.2 3.7 2.7 2.1 n/a n/a 29.8 — 2.5 8.9 22.5 3. level: Reading 2.4 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $29.6 — .0 2.1 — Humewood [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.4 E F 0.1 2.9 2.4 2.3 2.4 — 2.1 F 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 8.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.0 42.6 2.2 3.0 3.7 2.9 2.2 34.1 3.7 — F 0.3 5.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 26.7 Math 2.1 5.2 F 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 18.9 2.1 — 2.0 Overall rank: 166/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.1 6 7. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 — 1.5 2.1 23.400: 0. inc.8 — Math 2.5 2. inc. inc.9 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 — 3.4 n/a M 0.5 F 0.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 p Writing 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 57 Holy Child [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 10.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.3 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.0 — Humber Valley Village [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 3.4 28. of $73.8 Math 2.8 2.4 2.7 Math 2.2 F 0.2 28.3 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.5 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 20.7 Gr 6 avg.6 — Math 2.1 3.3 F 0.0 7.1 Special needs (%): 15.1 3.3 2.2 F 0.4 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 17.6 2.0 Writing 2.8 5. level: Reading 2.8 23. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 667/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 11.0 2.8 — Writing 2.3 Math F 0.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 30.5 2.8 6.1 28.4 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 3.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.0 2.0 2.3 F 0.1 — Holy Cross [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 17.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.7 — Math 2.9 3. level: Reading 3.7 23.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 p Writing 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 37.9 2.0 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 3 3.0 2.4 2.4 — 2.7 2.2 7.3 n/a Immaculate Conception [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 10.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — 2.7 — Humbercrest [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 0.8 4.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 6.6 3.4 q Math 2.4 2.2 E F 0.5 6.6 q 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 p Holy Rosary [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 16.9 21.9 2.7 2.0 3.1 n/a F 0.7 — 2.6 — 2. of $66.0 2.9 2.8 Math 2.6 — 6.7 3.4 39.

9 4.6 2.6 p 2.5 2.7 Tests below standard (%) 29.3 F 0.7 Writing 2.1 — Writing 3.4 2.9 6.2 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 n/a Jeanne-Lajoie [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 100.3 Gr 6 avg.0 2.4 3.0 2. of $50. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 — 2.6 2.5 Writing 3.4 2.7 2.8 2.9 — 2. inc.5 2.9 2. inc.8 11.7 2.5 q 20.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 3.0 — 6.6 2.3 2.1 n/a n/a E F 0.4 15.3 2.2 39.9 44. level: Reading 2.5 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 1.0 Math 2.2 — 7.1 — Math 2.4 2.3 7.8 2.2 2.4 Tests not written (%) 10.6 25.1 M 0.2 2.4 2.3 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 53/2742 28/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 p 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 3.2 7.9 6. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.9 4. level: Reading 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 38.1 M 0.9 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 67.9 3.7 3.9 3.0 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 — Islamic Foundation [Private] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.4 12. of $64.3 Writing 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 41.8 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 Tests not written (%) 6.8 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3. level: Reading 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Jesse Ketchum [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 0.3 3.6 Overall rank: 121/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $43.7 2.6 2.8 — Writing 2.2 q 2.2 3.4 — J G Workman [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.0 Math 2.7 47.6 — 12.6 — 2.9 — 2.5 2.1 n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.3 21.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — 2.7 2.7 — Math 2.4 28.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 39.2 n/a n/a M 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 Math M 0.0 1.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.3 M 0.1 5.0 2.900: 1.6 2.7 7. level: Reading 2.3 2.4 Math 2.4 1.3 2.6 3. inc.9 2.3 n/a Math 2.1 Writing 2.6 40.2 3.6 6.3 — F 0.7 2.5 2. of $48.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 E F 0.5 2.5 2.6 3.0 Special needs (%): 35.8 — Island Public/Natural Science [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.7 3.6 — 2.6 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 3.9 — 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 19.5 2.8 2.8 4.0 — Math 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 5.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.7 p 2.8 n/a Tests not written (%) 4.4 — 2.9 4.1 Math 2.8 2.5 2.5 — F 0.300: -1.2 F 0.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 p 2.4 2.9 Math 2.8 3.9 6.2 5. of $56.1 38.4 2.9 — 7.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — 2.1 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 9.6 2.8 2.5 2.5 — James Culnan [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 10.3 50. level: Reading 2.1 3.5 2. inc.0 0.500: -2.6 n/a 2.6 Writing 1.7 5.5 2.6 2.7 p 2.1 E F 0.1 7.8 p 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.2 6.8 2.2 6.6 q 2.4 14.6 2.9 2.9 Writing 2.0 — F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.3 9.9 2.5 F 0.8 Writing 2.0 2.2 8.3 1.5 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 q 2.5 10.1 5.2 F 0.2 3. of $135.2 4.8 6.6 q 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — Math 3.8 2.8 n/a 4.0 Special needs (%): 36.7 3.2 2. level: Reading 2.6 — Math 2.3 2.7 2.4 — F 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 F 0.8 — 2.2 30.4 2.3 3.4 Math F 0.5 — 2.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 20.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 50.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 2.1 2.8 Writing 2.4 2.4 2.6 11.3 2.8 Math 2.9 q Inglewood Heights [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 0.6 Math 2.8 2.8 3.9 2.3 3. level: Reading 2.3 — James S Bell [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6. level: Reading 2.7 3.3 — F 0.7 20.6 3.9 6.9 — 2.7 20.2 Tests not written (%) 6.9 Math 3.3 8.7 2.1 p 2.7 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 22.7 2.9 2.7 Tests not written (%) 9.6 2.3 Tests not written (%) 2.8 — John A Leslie [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 28.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 p 9.0 Special needs (%): 10.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 2.3 8.8 — Islington [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 8.1 F 0.4 2.5 Gr 6 avg.5 3.3 2.5 2.1 3.5 — 2.7 3.4 2.7 — Writing 2.8 2.0 — 7.0 — Math 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Math 2.5 F 0.6 2.2 p Math 3.5 2.2 10.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.5 2.4 2.2 6.2 8. inc.3 2.7 — Math 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.0 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 30.9 2. level: Reading 3.6 2. level: Reading 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 4. level: Reading 1.5 2. of $45.1 2.1 19.8 Gr 6 avg.5 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.4 p Writing 2.5 M 0.4 2.2 n/a 2.4 2.5 E — Math F 0.9 — 2.8 52.8 26. inc.6 4.9 — Iroquois [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 11.8 Overall rank: 2677/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Gr 6 avg.7 5. inc.0 3. level: Reading 2.100: 1.5 43. inc.8 2.7 2. of $54.8 2.6 34.9 3.8 2.8 2.5 6.4 5.3 n/a Writing 2.1 3.4 2.7 — Writing 2.8 Math 2.3 24.7 2.3 3.2 Math M 0.7 2.2 24.3 2.8 2.9 Writing 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.1 2.8 Math 3.9 3.8 2. inc.4 2.5 2.7 2.9 — 2.3 M 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.0 2.1 30.7 4.3 F 0.0 32.5 2.7 2.6 2.2 n/a n/a M 0.4 F 0.1 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 7.1 Tests below standard (%) 55. of $46.9 Math 3.7 2.7 2.9 — 2.1 M 0.3 Writing 2.5 — E F 0.4 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.1 15. level: Reading 2.2 9.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 F 0.1 — 45.7 2.9 Gr 6 avg.7 50.0 — J R Wilcox [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 2.4 — 2.800: 1.1 3.2 — .7 2.7 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 1.2 — 2.8 2.3 — 5.3 2.2 30. of $60.0 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.6 2.1 2.1 3.5 2.7 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.7 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2.9 3.9 — Math 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 11.1 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.8 2.6 9.1 Math M 0.9 14.5 — Ionview [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 n/a 2.2 2.0 37.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 43.1 — 3.4 1. of $52.7 — Gr 6 avg.5 — 29.3 — 3.9 14.6 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 6.4 2.2 — 3.0 3.4 Math 2. inc.9 — 2.9 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.6 42.0 2.3 3.7 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.200: -1.7 2.7 2.8 2.2 M 0.9 49.5 2.9 10 8.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2367/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.3 n/a n/a 52.2 9.1 3.2 F 0.2 — F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 3.3 6.8 0.8 31.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.5 E — F 0.3 2.8 2.4 Math 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.9 2.0 0.8 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.2 — 3. level: Reading 2.5 1.6 — 6.2 M 0.1 M 0.8 2.9 2.6 40.2 2.9 3.9 2.6 2.3 28.9 35.0 32.5 12.3 35.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 12.5 2.3 E F 0.3 Writing 2.6 Gr 6 avg.5 n/a 2.1 E — 39.9 7 8.1 F 0.7 3.8 6.5 2.5 q Math 2.0 5.6 28.58 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Indian Road Crescent [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 11.5 6.100: 1.7 Tests not written (%) 8.1 E p 26.8 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.7 — 2.8 2.1 p 27.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 25.4 1.2 2.8 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.0 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 — Writing 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.9 5.7 2.6 2.0 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 17.8 3. inc.1 p M 0.6 — 2.1 M 0.1 3.9 — Writing 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 7. inc.9 Math 1.8 3.0 3.0 3.300: 0.0 — Writing 3.2 n/a Writing 2.3 n/a 51.2 3.8 14.1 6.1 Tests below standard (%) 60.9 2.6 Overall rank: 511/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — F 0.700: 2. level: Reading 1.9 2.3 5.4 E F 0.4 2.7 2.1 Tests not written (%) 3.8 2. of $46.1 2.6 26.4 — 2.2 F 0.7 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 — M 0.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.3 Math 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.3 3.8 2.8 2.1 F 0.700: 0.1 3.6 3.4 2.9 — 4.7 3.8 3.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 3.5 Math F 0.5 2.9 2.5 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2478/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — 2.1 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2.9 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.3 3.6 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 p 2.0 q Overall rating out of 10 9.6 — Writing 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 2172/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 Writing 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 16.5 2. inc.4 F 0.2 — Writing 3.7 — F 0.6 2.6 2.6 2. inc.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 M 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a 37.1 n/a F 0.5 29.3 2.2 F 0.7 10.4 6.7 — Writing 2.0 3.4 4.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.7 2.1 3.6 n/a Math 3.3 — 5.0 2.800: 0.6 2.1 6.3 n/a 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.700: 1.5 Overall rating out of 10 3 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 13.8 4. level: Reading 2.4 5 5 6.6 2.2 3.3 Writing 2.2 — Writing 2.1 3.4 38.8 p 2.6 Writing 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 17.7 2.4 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 36.9 3.3 n/a n/a 60.4 3.8 3.9 33.3 M 0.7 n/a 2.0 0.8 — Math 3.2 3.1 — F 0. level: Reading 3.5 — Tests not written (%) 4.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 Special needs (%): 3.1 33.6 2.4 58.8 2.3 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.7 2.6 2.900: 1.5 6.8 2.4 2.8 2.2 F 0.9 6.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 51.3 Gr 6 avg.0 0. of $50.5 2.5 2.7 2.2 7 n/a 3.7 2.9 2. inc.3 2.7 5.2 6.3 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 16.2 — 2.5 Overall rank: 714/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 3.9 — Math 2.8 2.7 2.9 21.0 2. of $37.8 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 8.1 — 6.3 6 4.0 13.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 1.9 — 3.2 2.4 2.2 F 0.4 2.9 p Jackman Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 86 ESL (%): 0.200: -3.

2 q 5.9 q F 0.1 Gr 6 avg.3 3.5 n/a n/a F 0.9 2.1 Overall rank: 511/2742 58/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $40.8 19.4 3.9 3.1 — M 0.5 30.0 2.0 q 2.0 5.6 2.4 2.4 2.0 1.2 3.3 M 0.8 8.9 3.0 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.5 Tests not written (%) 3.3 8.2 3.2 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 9.5 2.2 2.6 5.6 11.9 6.9 3.6 Math 2.8 2.8 Tests not written (%) 14.7 Math 2.000: -1.1 3.5 17.4 — 19.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.9 n/a 2.4 2.7 0.7 3.1 M 0.7 — 3.6 Math F 0.4 3.2 2. of $60.4 7.3 F 0.9 2.3 Math F 0.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 — Math E F 0.5 16.3 3.9 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.9 8.3 F 0.2 2.5 — .9 2.3 3.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 2.1 Writing 2.0 17.7 2.3 — Keele Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.4 F 0.9 2.0 — Math 3.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.1 2.4 q 10 9.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 21 Special needs (%): 28.2 3.6 n/a 6.3 F 0.4 Tests not written (%) 0.2 40.8 13.6 Gr 6 avg.7 3.2 3.8 5.9 4.7 Writing 2.4 F 0.2 — 10.2 Tests below standard (%) 37.4 3.7 0.3 1.5 2.7 13. inc.9 2.0 3.7 2.1 3.6 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2342/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.0 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 21.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.0 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2478/2742 2190/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2.5 2.1 3.3 3.2 F 0.1 3.0 — 3.2 — 11.0 — 2.9 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 p 3.3 Tests not written (%) 2.2 F 0.1 Gr 6 avg.5 2. level: Reading 3.5 M 0.1 M 0.3 13.6 3.9 — 3.4 p Gr 6 avg.3 n/a 2.8 Writing 2.7 4.6 2.6 4.5 2.1 — F 0.2 E M 0.7 — 2.0 3.0 3.7 6.2 20.8 3.700: 0.9 — F 0.1 3.3 F 0.0 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 9.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 q 3.4 — 7.2 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 — 3.3 3.7 2.6 Math F 0.7 3.9 3.3 n/a F 0.1 F 0.8 — 2.9 3.0 3.4 n/a n/a M 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 6.2 3.9 n/a 0.2 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.8 Math 2.4 48.8 2.4 9.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.5 2.8 3.1 2.9 2.3 F 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 12. level: Reading 2.3 F 0. inc.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.9 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — F 0.8 — Math 2.4 Gr 6 avg.7 22.0 3.8 n/a 2.2 9.4 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 26.8 3.0 Math 3.3 2.8 — 3.5 q Tests not written (%) 8. of $43.6 Math 3.7 2.3 3.8 — 4.7 17.9 — Gr 6 avg.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — Writing 3.2 Math M 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 7 59 Gr 6 enrollment: 132 Special needs (%): 21.5 Math F 0.7 2.6 2.9 3.600: -2.8 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 8 6 7.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 n/a 2.0 3.2 8.9 12.4 Writing 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 3.1 2.6 2.6 2.8 5.0 q 3.7 — 2.0 Writing 3.3 13.4 Overall rank: 33/2742 27/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — Kew Beach [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 — Writing 3.300: 2.0 17.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 — Math 3. level: Reading 3.8 p 2.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 avg.9 — Writing 2.9 36.0 Math 3.3 2.2 Math 2. level: Reading 3.7 — 18.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 16.2 — 2.4 9.2 2.9 — 3.1 n/a 2.1 3.800: -3.500: 4.8 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.1 — F 0.3 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.0 3.3 q Writing 2.2 Writing 3.0 Writing 2.1 — Math 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 26.2 3.5 39.1 — Writing 3.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.0 Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 3.5 36.3 q 8.0 Writing 3.7 2.2 Gr 6 avg.1 3.7 5.2 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.300: -0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a John G Diefenbaker [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 0.8 — Math 3.3 M 0. of $385.9 2.4 3.4 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 3.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 Gr 6 avg.1 3.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.6 3.6 2.000: 0.1 — 1.4 7.8 2.4 2.4 Math 2. level: Reading 3.7 Tests not written (%) 0.2 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.3 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.6 29.7 19.2 Tests not written (%) 6.3 q Josyf Cardinal Slipyj [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 68 ESL (%): 10.1 Overall rating out of 10 9.1 Tests not written (%) 14.1 3.1 2.0 47.0 3.3 2.1 n/a n/a 13.0 q F 0.8 49.3 p 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.7 Overall rank: 235/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.4 58.3 57.1 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 20. level: Reading 2. inc.2 3.9 13. inc. level: Reading 3.4 F 0.7 2.2 F 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 9.8 Writing 2.2 n/a Math n/a E M 0.4 3.5 n/a 2.6 Writing 2.4 7.1 6.4 M 0.4 q Math E F 0. level: Reading 2.5 — 2.5 Math 2.6 — 3.2 M 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 — John Ross Robertson [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 80 ESL (%): 3.3 3. of $92.2 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 13.7 — Kennedy [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.2 — 3.4 n/a 4.3 — 3.0 Special needs (%): 35.2 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 Kensington [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 16.8 Writing 2.0 1.3 — 7.9 3.3 4.2 F 0.3 2. level: Reading 2.2 2. of $43.1 9 9.8 — E F 0.3 F 0.2 3.7 2.9 2.8 2.400: -1.9 3.2 F 0.5 F 0.4 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 49.3 3.1 2.2 4.9 2.8 14.800: -2. inc.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 24.0 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.3 — Writing 3.2 3.1 F 0.2 13.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 — John Wanless [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 8.6 Math 2.3 2.1 6.1 3.1 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 10 Gr 6 enrollment: 67 Special needs (%): 16.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 31.2 — 2.4 M 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.0 3.4 F 0.5 27.3 3. level: Reading 2.3 3.3 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.2 E F 0.2 n/a n/a F 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 9.2 18. inc.2 n/a F 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 79 Special needs (%): 25.8 8.0 — 3.0 n/a Lambton Kingsway [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 76 ESL (%): 0.1 F 0.4 n/a 41.3 8.2 — Math 3.2 3.5 2.6 9.800: 1.0 3.4 — 2.5 2.6 3. level: Reading 3.200: 1. level: Reading 2.9 — 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.6 Tests not written (%) 13.7 Math 2.7 10 10.6 2.5 F 0.1 3.5 2.1 F 0.3 2.0 2.3 3. level: Reading 2. inc.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1/2742 5/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 n/a 9.0 1.1 3.8 26.9 2.1 17.2 5.0 q Kimberley [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 2.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 20.9 8.9 7.2 F 0.5 3.8 — Writing 3.9 2.7 Writing 2.3 3.2 n/a F 0.8 10.3 — F 0.4 q 11.4 9.1 Tests below standard (%) 66.8 Special needs (%): 15.8 Writing 2.6 — 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 6. of $188.6 2.2 1.9 3.8 n/a 2.9 3.8 3.5 2.1 Writing 3.2 — 9 9.8 2.1 6.6 Writing 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 8.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 Overall rating out of 10 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 3.2 q 2. inc.7 2.9 — 3.5 2.8 49.9 2.8 Math 3.0 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy John English [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 1.3 Writing 3.3 3.6 Writing 3.8 2.2 Math F 0.6 — 2.1 3.0 Writing 2.0 2.9 Math 3.1 F 0.3 5.2 7.7 2.1 — E E M 0.1 2.4 2.9 3.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 46.1 E — 46.4 Math 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 4.0 3.8 3.1 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 40/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 F 0.8 3.0 — Knob Hill [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.0 Math 3.0 2.1 n/a 23.4 2.8 n/a 2.9 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.0 3.8 — Kingslake [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 — 13.1 — 9.1 q 2.1 — F 0.6 n/a 3. inc.6 2. of $56.0 Special needs (%): 19.1 2. level: Reading 3.7 — 2.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 21.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.1 Math 3.1 3.0 2.3 — Math F 0.5 2.1 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 6.4 3.4 2.1 2.5 21.1 — 35. inc.3 4.2 8 8.0 2.3 Math 2.8 3.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.0 3.1 — F 0.9 q 2.7 2.3 19.5 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.400: -1.4 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 52.2 Math F 0. of $375.0 2.2 3.0 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 10.6 3.5 1.6 11.5 — Tests not written (%) 4.2 F 0.4 F 0.6 2.6 2. of $43.1 3.6 2.8 3. of $195.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2.9 Math 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.0 3.3 — Keelesdale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.6 n/a 2. inc.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3.5 15.1 2.3 3.0 2.4 3.0 — 3.2 2.1 F 0.3 2.8 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.1 2.1 F 0. inc.2 M 0.2 Tests not written (%) 4.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2.2 15.7 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — 8.3 8.7 n/a 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 9.6 — Writing 2. of $55.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.0 2.5 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 56.4 3.8 2.0 — Math 3.7 Gr 6 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.6 — 2.3 Special needs (%): 7.7 3.700: 0.8 — 3.4 Overall rank: 2262/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.9 2.9 3.9 2.0 3.1 3.5 8.8 8.4 3.1 E F 0.4 n/a M 0. of $37.5 — 2.8 2. of $98.4 2.4 2.6 — 2.3 Math M 0.9 2.5 2.0 — 2.0 2.4 3.1 8.2 3.5 Gr 6 avg.3 Math 3.9 29.1 — Tests below standard (%) 10.4 8.2 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.5 2.5 2.2 3.0 41.2 3.1 3.4 3.5 2.2 0.9 Writing 3.9 — 2.1 p 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.0 3.6 2.8 0.5 24.6 13.5 q 23.0 2.5 Writing 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.7 Special needs (%): 16.9 14.3 — Overall rating out of 10 9.0 2.2 30.8 2.1 F 0.4 — 3.3 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 Lambton Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.5 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 9.2 3.8 3.1 3.9 2.4 — F 0.9 3.4 11.4 — 2.9 — 3.1 2.8 Math 3.6 — 3.2 — 3.3 3.1 M 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — Overall rating out of 10 9.7 3.5 3.

6 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 3.8 2.8 — 12.0 — 2.9 — 2.8 — 2.6 2.4 13.7 5.5 2.1 — 2.3 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 3.6 Writing 2.8 2.5 — F 0.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.5 2.7 6.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 F 0.4 — 2.6 2.3 — 2.0 Math 3.8 — 2.0 Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2367/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.3 — F 0.3 2.8 3.5 2.0 2.9 3. inc.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 6.8 2.700: 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.5 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 6.8 q 3.7 2.5 Writing 2. inc. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.3 2.1 F 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.1 5. level: Reading 2.6 2.400: 0.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 34.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 6.6 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.4 — Malvern [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 51.500: 1.1 26.6 3.5 q 11.4 E — F 0.8 p 2. of $43.9 8.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 7 8.2 q Leslieville [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 7.5 Math 2.8 — 2.7 2.6 3.2 — 2.9 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 E F 0.4 F 0.9 3.3 — M 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 E n/a n/a 52.2 — F 0.5 Tests not written (%) 2.0 2.2 5. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 1.1 E M 0.3 — Lord Dufferin [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 2.1 F 0.6 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.6 2.7 Tests not written (%) 8.3 — M 0.7 Math 2.8 — 2.4 E — 31.4 6.6 Writing 2.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 80 Special needs (%): 20.7 2.6 2.4 — n/a n/a F 0.5 F 0.9 2.0 2.1 M 0.1 48.4 6.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 10.3 2.1 2.5 — 7. level: Reading 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 F 0.4 2.7 — Lord Lansdowne [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 12.0 2.4 2.5 15.5 Overall rating out of 10 8.2 2.6 Math 2.7 — 6.6 Writing 2.8 2.2 q 3.3 2.9 — 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 21.4 Overall rating out of 10 4. of $28.6 2.6 2.9 2.2 M 0.7 2.6 Writing 2.7 2.5 — 4.8 40.0 — 2.3 Writing 2. inc.9 8.9 — F 0.0 2.8 6.8 2.9 Math 2.9 4.6 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 34.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 17.2 M 0.2 2.3 F 0.9 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 22.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — 2.3 F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 0. inc.5 41.4 F 0.0 Writing 2.1 M 0.1 F 0.4 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.6 2. level: Reading 3.7 2.6 0.7 — F 0.0 Gr 6 avg.2 45.3 Writing 3.5 — Ledbury Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 2.4 Math 2.7 2. of $43.9 2.9 q F 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 37.9 2.4 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.1 6.8 2. of $55.5 2.1 — 41.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 — Macklin [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 — 0.1 — 4.4 2.9 40.6 6.6 21.0 6.4 2.4 — Writing 2.900: 1.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.1 F 0.5 2.6 3.8 3.8 3.1 — Maryvale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 — F 0.5 2.0 — 3.8 2.7 28.200: 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.6 Writing 2.7 — F 0.7 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.1 n/a M 0.5 2.8 2.8 — 5.9 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 Math 2.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 20.2 3.8 2.7 — E F 0.7 Math 2.7 2.4 2.8 — 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Gr 6 avg.8 — n/a M 0.5 Writing 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 7.8 18.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2548/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — 2.9 3.3 Gr 6 avg.8 3.8 — Writing 2.6 2.5 2.1 M 0.1 21.0 7.6 Gr 6 avg.400: -1.5 2.2 M 0.3 37.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 23.8 3.5 3.0 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 68 Special needs (%): 13.4 28. of $40.9 — 2.1 Gr 6 avg.5 2.9 2.2 6.0 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 Writing 2.2 1.1 Tests below standard (%) 29.4 36.6 Writing 2.8 3.1 E M 0.4 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 3 5.7 4. inc.7 6.2 1.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 p 8.6 2.8 — 2.7 Gr 6 avg.5 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 7.1 2.8 2.6 4.7 2.3 11.9 2.8 — 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 2057/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 8.9 Writing 2.5 6.3 5.8 3.8 2.7 2.7 Tests not written (%) 6.0 Math 3. inc.6 — 2.4 2.2 — 51.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 F 0.1 Math F 0.8 8.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.0 2.2 — M 0.8 — 2.9 2.2 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 9.600: -3.3 15.2 2.4 2.8 Math 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 9.8 2.7 2.8 2.2 F 0.8 14.2 3.1 — 2.9 — 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.6 2.3 Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.3 — F 0.3 Math 2.5 — 2.3 2.9 — 2.2 2.5 5.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.500: -0.2 — Mary Shadd [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3. inc.8 2.6 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2. inc.9 — 6 6.3 4.8 9.8 Tests not written (%) 2.7 5.9 56.2 F 0.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 E — 21.6 4.3 F 0.4 Tests not written (%) 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 43.0 — 2.0 2.4 3.5 Special needs (%): 25. level: Reading 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 56.1 2.2 3.8 3.5 — 2.7 — 2.3 2.7 Writing 2.6 2.6 41.2 M 0.6 2.0 Math 3.7 2.7 F 0.5 q 2.0 — 3.3 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 5.5 40.0 — Lord Roberts [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 F 0. of $39.0 3.6 9.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 36.1 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 43.1 28.7 Tests not written (%) 7.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 5. inc.2 5.8 4.0 Math 3. of $29.7 2.8 2.1 29.7 n/a n/a M 0.1 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $18.9 5.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2.7 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 2.8 2.3 — 2.9 2.5 2.2 6.0 Writing 3.4 2.9 36.3 — Lucy Maud Montgomery [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.4 Math 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 M 0.6 — 2.7 — Math 3.4 — 2.6 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 19.4 2.2 Overall rank: 1886/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.0 — 2.300: 0.1 4.2 50.2 — 22. of $44.0 2.6 0.5 — 2.1 35.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 39.5 2.5 — 2.7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.8 11.4 Tests not written (%) 7.3 20.9 2.60 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Lanor [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 2.1 p 37.6 52.8 3. level: Reading 2.9 p 2.5 2.1 q 5.1 Tests not written (%) 11.7 — 19.2 M 0. level: Reading 2. of $40.7 Gr 6 avg.0 — 8.1 Math M 0.5 2.1 Math M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.4 30.6 — 3.7 — 2.4 12.4 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 6.8 Gr 6 avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 28.5 — F 0.9 Writing 3.2 2.7 3.5 Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 0.1 — 34.1 2.1 — 2.0 2.7 — Lescon [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 3.7 2.4 4.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 27. level: Reading 3.9 2. inc.9 2.1 F 0.3 1.7 Tests not written (%) 3.3 2.8 3.7 60.6 Writing 2.3 n/a 57. inc.2 F 0.4 — .7 2.600: 1.0 3. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 29.3 2.7 2.4 — 2.4 19.4 — 6.6 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 30.8 39. level: Reading 2.9 — 5.4 2.1 M 0. of $47.7 2.4 — 0.1 — 21. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 3.6 3.4 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 17.9 5.7 2.3 2.6 Math 3.1 — 0.1 Writing 3.3 2. of $49.7 — 2.4 — 2.2 2.4 2.9 6.2 3.8 — 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 15.0 Writing 3.2 E E M 0.7 Math 2.7 22.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 2.8 5.2 — 7.4 — 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Writing 2.5 Writing 2.7 2.6 2.8 Math 2.0 p 2.2 3.8 11.7 2.8 — 2.2 2.4 — 2.1 Math M 0.2 6.2 2.3 2.900: 0. level: Reading 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.0 2.8 — 3.6 2.2 F 0.7 2.5 E F 0.6 Writing 3.5 Writing 2.6 2.1 F 0.1 E F 0.4 Math 2.8 2.0 28.600: 1.8 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 n/a Market Lane [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 — 2.3 41.1 — F 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Math 2.7 48.5 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 7.7 — 2.1 Math 3.6 7. level: Reading 2.3 M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.4 2.4 7.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 3.0 3.4 — 2.2 Math 2.1 Math M 0.8 — 2.6 Math 2.6 49.9 — 2.0 2.6 — 2.4 18.1 2.0 Math 2.1 — F 0.4 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a 38.9 Gr 6 avg. inc.5 Math 2.9 Math 3.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.4 E — 25.5 Math 2.7 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 26.0 5.3 2.6 2.7 — 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.2 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.600: 1.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 39.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 2.2 E M 0.1 Math M 0.7 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 3.0 4.1 52.5 39.7 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Math F 0.9 26.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 37.4 3.9 7.5 31. of $212.7 2.1 — 3.9 2.9 2.1 F 0.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.100: 0.7 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 8.7 2.9 — 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.4 n/a n/a n/a 20.6 Mason Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 2.6 4.7 — 2.3 F 0.0 — 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1991/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — 2.2 — M 0.2 2.8 — Math 2.1 5.1 — 5.4 Math F 0.0 3.0 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. of $52.8 2.7 3.2 — Laure-Rièse [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 82.6 2.7 18.9 2.1 — 2.2 2.5 — 2.800: -2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.0 25.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — 2.2 2.8 — 3.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.6 Writing 2. of $40.5 q 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.7 Gr 6 avg.

2 4.0 63.3 3.1 8.0 4.8 2.2 5.5 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.6 Math 2.2 43.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.9 — 2.0 2.3 M 0.3 2.0 n/a North Bridlewood [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 0.9 23.1 F 0.9 2.6 23.7 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 0.7 2.1 F 0.6 — 2.9 Writing 2.7 7.4 Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2. inc. level: Reading 2.5 2.3 n/a 6.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.000: 2.4 4.2 3.7 M 0.4 M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.5 0.2 38.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.9 p 2.1 — 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 3.4 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 20.5 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 6.6 2.5 n/a n/a E n/a F 0.7 n/a 3.1 E F 0.5 Writing 2.8 Tests not written (%) 11.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 Math F 0.8 3.0 3.0 q Overall rating out of 10 5.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 Gr 6 avg.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 10.8 20.9 16.3 E — M 0.7 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 38.5 2.6 n/a Math 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — 3.4 — Gr 6 avg.7 — 2.0 3.9 — .5 2.8 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 61 Maurice Cody [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 40.4 12.5 Writing 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.3 n/a 27.5 2.9 11.0 3.8 n/a 2.3 2.6 2.800: 3.1 F 0.8 — 2.0 20.2 M 0.6 3.0 2.6 — McMurrich [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.2 F 0. inc.0 — 6.7 — 2.9 p 2.4 n/a 28.0 Overall rank: 98/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 n/a 3.8 2.1 n/a 2.0 Gr 6 avg.0 2.5 2.1 2.8 2.9 3. of $51. of $13.3 F 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Tests below standard (%) 57.7 2.8 2.9 n/a 3.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 n/a 6.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 3. inc.8 7.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.2 4.8 2.8 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — 2.7 — Nelson Mandela Park [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 3.6 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.0 Special needs (%): 38.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.4 Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.6 E — 51.8 2.7 Overall rank: 2548/2742 2190/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.5 — 2.1 3.1 Math M 0.0 23.4 Math 2.8 2. inc.4 n/a 3.5 22.600: -1.4 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.7 2.3 3.2 — McCowan Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. inc.0 n/a Writing 2.4 E — E F 0.9 — F 0.4 Writing 2. of $43.2 2.6 F 0.9 p Writing 2.9 3.1 Writing 3.3 E — 27.6 48.5 22.4 F 0.4 — 0.8 2.7 2.1 2.7 36.4 M 0.3 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 38.8 2.700: -2.0 3.7 — Writing 2.7 2.1 — 14.2 F 0.8 2.6 27.6 2.5 — Morrish [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.000: 1.7 2.9 2.7 2.6 — F 0.3 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 5.8 2.7 2.3 Tests not written (%) 6.7 3.4 3.9 — 3.5 Math 2. of $176.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $59.1 Writing 2.5 2.7 — 2. of $122.4 3.0 2.4 8.2 M 0.0 2.4 — 2.0 — 3.7 Math 2.1 2.0 — 2.9 2.3 1.8 p 0.9 Gr 6 avg.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.0 3.9 6. level: Reading 2.6 2.3 5.2 Tests below standard (%) 22.8 10.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.2 — 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) 10.1 E M 0.8 2.2 45.8 2.2 M 0.400: 1.6 2.2 2.1 — F 0.8 2.1 6.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 15.1 2.4 2.3 — 6.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 8.0 1.4 2.1 F 0.6 — 4.7 2.8 5.4 16.1 Tests below standard (%) 54.7 2.7 2.8 3.5 1.1 — 3.3 2.5 2.6 2.1 — 32.5 6.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.200: 1.7 Math 2.3 p Norseman [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 1.3 2.7 20.5 — 21. level: Reading 2.9 3.900: 1.7 2.0 3.5 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 2.3 n/a F 0.0 q Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 E — Math M 0.0 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 22.7 2.5 2.5 26.0 Math 3.8 n/a 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 3.8 2.1 — E E M 0.9 Overall rating out of 10 3.3 20. level: Reading 2.3 — 4.6 Gr 6 avg.4 Gr 6 avg.0 2.5 Math 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.4 p 10.2 n/a 28.5 — 2.1 — 10 8.0 — Math 2.0 2.2 E — F 0.0 27. of $50.4 0.3 2.0 0.2 n/a F 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 8.0 q Writing 2.3 7.4 — Math F 0.8 Writing 2.6 2.7 — 2.3 — 6.6 Writing 2.1 3.4 2.6 Math 2.1 5.1 2.000: 1.5 1.1 F 0.3 n/a 8.1 2.5 M 0.1 12.0 Math 3.7 2.8 — 2.1 E M 0. of $69.7 4.600: 1.8 37.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 18.3 E F 0.6 2.6 — 2.2 Writing 2.5 p F 0.5 21.3 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 M 0.9 — Math 2.1 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 9.6 2.4 Tests not written (%) 11.1 2.5 Overall rank: 2575/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 q 3.8 3. level: Reading 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Writing 2.5 M 0.8 — 3.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 13. level: Reading 2.7 39.9 17. of $45.7 2.4 n/a Meadowvale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 5. inc.9 Math 2. level: Reading 2.4 Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 Tests not written (%) 9.7 2.500: -0.8 2.4 q Math 2.3 Math 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.3 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 46.1 — 2.2 3.0 Special needs (%): 15. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 13.7 2.6 2.3 26.7 2.8 2.6 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.8 n/a 2.6 2.200: 0.7 6.4 2.3 Special needs (%): 20.1 F 0.8 — 8. inc.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.7 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 F 0. of $34.0 2.1 F 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 35.0 n/a 2.0 2.9 16.5 2. of $42.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.4 3.1 — 2.2 6.5 n/a 4.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Tests not written (%) 2.3 4.2 q Tests not written (%) 6.4 Math F 0.1 — 50.2 n/a n/a 31.8 2.6 9.5 4.6 — 3.5 2.6 — 2.9 — 3.3 F 0.1 3. inc.0 Writing 2. inc.9 2.4 57.9 3. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.2 Writing 2.8 5.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 12.4 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 7.8 Writing 3.8 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.0 Tests not written (%) 1.7 — Overall rating out of 10 5. level: Reading 2.0 Math 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.6 2.9 2.6 2.9 — 3.8 Math 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.4 2.3 F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.4 2.6 — 3.9 — 2. level: Reading 3.9 1.5 46.3 1.4 — F 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.4 q 6.8 2.6 p 2.1 — 40.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.6 n/a Math 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 3.1 Math F 0.7 4.2 2.0 0. inc. level: Reading 2.8 n/a 2.9 — 3.4 6.8 8.7 p E F 0.9 2.7 2.1 n/a F 0.6 2.3 44.1 n/a F 0.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.5 7.6 0.2 Tests not written (%) 1.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.5 4. of $44.5 M 0.5 26.7 7.7 n/a 2. level: Reading 2.7 Math 3.1 n/a M 0.8 n/a 2.5 2.3 5.0 11.4 p 2.0 3.9 n/a North Agincourt [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.5 — Math 2.2 2.7 — Writing 2.4 28.8 5.6 2.0 n/a 2.6 2.7 2.4 — Milliken [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 15.5 2.8 n/a 2.7 2.4 2.8 2.3 E F 0.300: 0.6 2.9 3.6 2.8 — F 0.2 2.4 Overall rank: 396/2742 879/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Overall rating out of 10 9.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 59 Special needs (%): 25.2 F 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 p 2.9 3.2 1.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.5 2.8 — Military Trail [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 Math 2.3 2.9 — 2.9 — 2.0 n/a 2.2 — 2.9 27.9 n/a 2.9 5.2 n/a Writing 2.1 F 0.8 3.8 2.9 26.7 2.2 Math F 0.6 M 0.3 7.9 6.2 20.6 2.7 Math 2.3 Tests not written (%) 11.8 — 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.6 6.5 43.2 Math M 0.5 2.3 2.200: 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.8 3.1 3.1 3.6 2.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 M 0.4 Overall rank: 667/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 30.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — Math 2.9 — Muirhead [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.4 Math 2.7 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 5.2 29.7 3.8 2.2 M 0.0 Writing 2.9 n/a 2.8 p 2.0 3.0 3.2 0.2 11.6 2.6 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 3. inc.7 2.9 — 5.4 2.6 n/a 2. of $65.6 Math 2.1 22.5 F 0.7 Writing 2.2 4.7 2.7 — 22.6 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Writing 2.2 E — 25.4 E F 0.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 89 Special needs (%): 21.6 2.9 6.8 27.3 q M 0.8 2.5 7.0 2.8 3.1 7.3 — 2.5 F 0. of $67.3 F 0.3 F 0.4 p Nativity of Our Lord [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 7.9 Writing 3.9 — F 0.3 7.9 2.7 — 4.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — Tests below standard (%) 33.1 6.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Overall rating out of 10 3. inc.1 6.3 2.1 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 53/2742 46/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 p 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Math M 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 62.5 n/a 2.0 Special needs (%): 30.6 2.1 F 0.3 — Mother Cabrini [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.2 F 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.2 F 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 28. level: Reading 2. of $29.2 2.6 11.5 7.6 2.1 2.9 3.7 2.8 2.6 1.1 29.2 — North Kipling [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 2.7 Writing 2.6 — 2.7 2.9 45. level: Reading 3.3 2.7 3.3 F 0.1 M 0.0 Gr 6 avg.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 18.4 — Writing 2.9 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.4 Tests not written (%) 8.5 9.1 M 0.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3. level: Reading 1.1 Tests below standard (%) 11.8 — 2.8 2.6 2.8 p 2.7 E — Math M 0.5 3.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.2 8.4 n/a 6.7 2.3 2.1 p Math 2.3 Math 2.5 F 0.5 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 13.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.8 2.2 F 0.1 3.6 2. inc.3 2. inc.5 — F 0.9 q F 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 2.6 2.0 2.600: 0.6 2.6 2.2 — F 0.8 2.5 43.4 3.9 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.

3 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0. inc.1 p 2.1 29.0 3.2 3.7 2.4 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 p Gr 6 avg.9 3.9 — Math 2.6 2.0 3.2 Special needs (%): 26.6 31.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.8 3.3 n/a n/a n/a 19.8 35. of $46.5 4.1 2.1 F 0.2 — 10.5 5.4 2.4 3. level: Reading 2.3 37. level: Reading n/a 2.3 20.4 40.9 7.4 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 28.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 4.8 32.5 3.3 3.6 2.1 2.9 — 11.4 10 10 9.3 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.000: 0.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.700: 2.4 24.6 n/a Math n/a 2.1 3.3 22.1 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 10 9.6 16.4 2.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $184.4 M 0.0 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 1.200: -1.4 F 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 3.8 p Writing 2.4 F 0.6 — Math M 0.6 8.8 2.8 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 82 Special needs (%): 20.1 3.8 2. of $65.2 2.6 F 0.8 7.0 — 2.1 9.7 — Writing 2.5 — Writing 2.7 Tests not written (%) 6.9 4.7 2.8 3.1 2.6 9.1 — 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.0 4.2 — Writing 3.7 12.9 2.5 3.1 M 0.8 2.6 2.0 2.9 7. inc.3 2.4 — Writing 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 47.6 2.2 F 0.3 6.7 q Tests not written (%) 9.2 F 0.8 2.6 7.5 — Ogden [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 6.8 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 1.1 M 0.9 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 — Math 2.5 2.4 n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 31.5 6.2 3.9 7.6 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.4 Our Lady of Lourdes [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 61 ESL (%): 14.3 7 6.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 Special needs (%): 8.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 5.0 2.9 Math 3.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 30.7 — Math 2. of $50.7 2.8 8.3 1.9 3.5 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.62 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 North Preparatory [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 19.1 M 0.9 2.8 2.4 Math F 0.8 — 2.8 3.2 2.0 3.7 2.8 0.2 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.9 — Writing 2.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 — Math 2.1 Writing 3.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 4 4.5 F 0.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.7 — F 0.5 6.3 3.9 — 2.9 2.8 7.7 2.9 2.4 3.5 3. level: Reading 2.0 1.2 q Math E M 0.1 3.1 — Overall rating out of 10 4.6 2.9 3.3 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 18.6 — Writing 2.0 2.0 2.9 2.4 2.3 7.5 2.7 3.2 7.3 Overall rank: 2311/2742 2190/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 6.7 — Math 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.300: 1.9 — Our Lady of Fatima [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 83 ESL (%): 7.6 2.1 17.3 5.6 2.9 3.0 p Math 2.2 5.0 — Writing 2.1 n/a F 0.4 — Writing 2.7 2.1 Gr 6 avg.7 2.8 2.3 19.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 9.7 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.0 3.8 2.8 3.6 2.2 3.9 2.0 Writing 2.5 6.600: -0. of $91.4 Overall rank: 39/2742 10/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 n/a n/a 31.7 5.8 2.5 2.1 9.6 2.2 — Writing 3.6 2. inc.8 21.2 M 0.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 3.7 2.0 — Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.6 — Writing 2.5 n/a Oriole Park [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 Special needs (%): 13.7 — Math 2.9 2.8 3.9 18.4 9.6 2.0 3.7 2.9 Writing 2.8 2.6 2.1 Tests not written (%) 3.9 — Math 2.0 Math 3. of $290.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a M 0.0 31.7 3.6 2.0 — Our Lady of Grace [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 8. level: Reading n/a 2.4 1.5 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 23. level: Reading 3.4 20.4 F 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Our Lady of Victory [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 77 ESL (%): 7.3 5.200: -1.8 2.7 19. of $106.7 2.0 2.7 Overall rank: 511/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 28.9 6.2 3.6 — 5.1 E n/a n/a F 0.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 40.3 21.7 2.8 2.1 3.9 3.1 F 0.0 — 12. level: Reading n/a 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.8 3.0 3.3 F 0.5 2.3 Special needs (%): 25.4 M 0.4 2.8 2.6 2.1 25. inc.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 n/a Orde Street [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 10.8 Special needs (%): 27.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 q 7.0 6.8 2. of $32.0 2.6 9.8 — 2.0 2.0 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 4. level: Reading 2.2 3. level: Reading 3.8 2.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 16.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.9 — n/a F 0.7 2.9 3.3 4.7 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 2.5 6. level: Reading n/a 2.5 2.6 Special needs (%): 5.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 3.7 — Math 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.7 2.1 2. level: Reading 3.3 — Math 3.8 3.8 3.0 3.7 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.5 2.0 2.8 — Math 2.8 2.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.0 3.5 3.0 Special needs (%): 5.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 13.8 — 3.8 2. inc.0 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 F 0.0 2. level: Reading 2.2 Special needs (%): 3.8 2.1 F 0.6 2.7 2.8 7.7 5.9 Math 3.3 2.6 2. inc.8 — 3.1 n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 50.000: -0.8 2.9 2.2 Special needs (%): 7.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 0.9 3.5 n/a Math n/a 2.1 20.2 2.6 2.2 F 0.1 13. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.7 11.0 4.200: 1.8 2.5 — Math 3.1 — Our Lady of Sorrows [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 78 ESL (%): 9.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Special needs (%): 14.7 36.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 2.8 8.2 E — Math M 0.4 2. inc.0 2.6 33.2 13.8 — Our Lady of Peace [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 3.0 2.6 2.4 5.1 5.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.800: 1.2 8.1 2. inc.8 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 186/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.6 2.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 8.9 Gr 6 avg.7 2.7 2.9 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 Math 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 2.8 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 F 0.2 37.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6 6.1 7.1 2.3 2.2 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.3 6 6.1 p 2.5 F 0.9 2.4 11.0 — 2.4 — 6.6 Writing 2.8 — Math 3.7 21.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2. inc.2 12.7 2.3 M 0.5 2.8 1.8 3.4 42.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.3 2.5 3.8 2.8 Gr 6 avg. inc.4 45.6 3.6 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.1 Overall rank: 45/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.2 2.1 M 0.1 3.1 2.2 F 0.5 2.1 3.0 16.0 2.1 3.8 61.0 — 2.3 Overall rank: 1087/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 6.9 2. inc.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 5.1 M 0.3 — 3.6 8.8 4.2 F 0.8 n/a Our Lady of the Assumption [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 52.3 43.4 27.8 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.7 2.1 13.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 3. level: Reading 3.1 13.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.6 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 8.9 2.0 3. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1991/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 19.1 3.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.5 2.3 8.1 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.8 Math 2.0 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.9 2.0 Writing 2.1 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.2 F 0.5 3.9 7.7 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.9 0.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.3 M 0.1 2.6 — Norway [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 2. level: Reading 3.2 2.8 3.9 61.3 F 0.7 37.1 3.6 16.7 2.7 3.4 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.0 3.2 Special needs (%): 7.1 3.0 1.6 3.4 E F 0.0 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.6 n/a F 0.1 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.1 p 2.6 2.1 3.1 3.7 6.8 7.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 4.9 2.3 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 — Ossington/Old Orchard [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 0.1 — F 0.9 7. of $101.8 3.0 3.3 Overall rank: 396/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 — F 0.0 2.0 2.9 2.3 3.3 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 27.7 2.1 F 0.6 F 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 — Math 3.7 3.7 2.8 Math 2.1 3.0 2.5 — Writing 2.500: 3.2 4.8 Overall rank: 25/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 6.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 Writing 2.6 F 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 86/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 29.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.9 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.4 12. inc.8 2.6 2.0 3.8 — Math 2. inc.8 — Tests not written (%) 27.2 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.5 6.8 2.400: -1.6 2.3 2.9 — Writing 3.1 — 23.9 2.8 3.2 F 0.5 3.3 2.9 2.6 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.2 Tests below standard (%) 25.2 E F 0.7 3.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.3 2.7 3. of $172.5 2.7 2.5 30.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.6 5.4 — Tests below standard (%) 37.8 — Northlea [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 n/a Math n/a E F 0.9 2.6 Overall rank: 2651/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.0 2.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 19.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.1 — Writing 3.6 5.0 2.6 Tests not written (%) 1.3 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 3.0 2.7 8.0 0.7 — 2.2 Overall rank: 902/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 31.2 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.5 34.2 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 2.9 — Writing 2.4 44.1 3. level: Reading n/a 2.1 3.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 17.0 — Math 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 4.2 5.4 2.6 2.5 n/a Our Lady of Perpetual Help [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 19.9 — .0 3.4 7.9 3. of $41.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 p Math F 0.0 3.0 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 10.2 — Math E F 0.7 2.6 2. inc.3 E M 0.0 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 23. of $327.0 3.8 3.1 56.8 2.9 3.6 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.2 2.7 14.0 3.900: -3.6 2.

1 n/a 2.3 46.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 F 0.0 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 Writing 2.8 2.3 3.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3.8 Gr 6 avg.0 — 2.3 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.7 6.3 M 0. inc.3 q Overall rating out of 10 8.3 37.6 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.8 2 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 16.0 2.3 E M 0.0 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.3 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.7 F 0.2 Gr 6 avg.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 31.0 — 12.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 8.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 44.4 3.7 10 6.5 — Peter Secor [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 14.3 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.3 — 4.8 13.7 23.4 p Writing 2.9 2.9 8.4 Writing 2.8 p 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.9 2.2 — 40.1 n/a F 0.4 16.9 2.6 3.9 2.100: 2.3 — F 0.7 2.3 2.7 2.100: 0.9 3.8 — 2.3 Writing 2. of $222.8 2.1 — 35.9 3.9 2.4 2.5 15.5 — 2.2 2. of $32. level: Reading 2.9 Math 2.0 11.2 Tests not written (%) 10.9 3.6 2.0 — 1.1 Math M 0.7 2.9 Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.4 n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.9 p 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27. of $64.8 10.3 p E E F 0.0 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 43.9 Writing 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 — 3.0 Overall rank: 1038/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 8.9 6.9 Writing 2.6 — F 0. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 39.5 23. inc.3 2.4 2.2 — Poplar Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 2.6 — 2.9 2.8 7.9 — 8.4 Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.400: 0.9 3.1 — F 0.3 24.4 p 6.4 6.2 2.9 2.9 2. of $60.4 Gr 6 avg.6 Writing 2.6 — 7.2 2.1 12.8 Writing 2.1 24.9 11.0 9.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2583/2742 2316/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.9 34.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 2. level: Reading 1.7 23.1 3.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) 8.3 Math 2.400: -0.1 n/a n/a F 0.8 — 17. of $41.3 14.1 — Math 3.6 — F 0.5 2.7 Math 2.8 Tests not written (%) 10.3 3.6 Math 2.1 Math 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — M 0.6 2.8 Math 2.3 2.5 Overall rank: 2284/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — Math 3.6 2. of $47.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 p 2. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.9 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 57.6 2.3 5.5 n/a 3.3 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 3. level: Reading 2.8 3.6 n/a Writing 3.6 2.7 2.6 Math 2.5 2.0 2.8 — F 0.5 — 2.9 2.8 2.2 Writing 3.6 p E F 0.2 M 0.7 — 2.1 7.7 7.6 2.9 29.8 2.9 2.1 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.2 34.0 Overall rating out of 10 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 15.8 7 7.1 9.7 2.1 — 2.9 6.3 — 6.4 2.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.6 7.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.1 F 0.4 2.6 — 2.900: -2.4 56.8 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 5.6 2.9 — 2.0 Tests not written (%) 2. level: Reading 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 F 0. inc.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 33. of $101.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.8 2.4 2.7 Math 3.7 Writing 2.9 Special needs (%): 3.6 2.600: -2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 70.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.4 — 2.8 4.0 — Perth Avenue [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 20.5 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 34.3 3.8 2.2 10.2 2.6 q Tests not written (%) 6.3 n/a F 0.8 2.1 Writing 2.9 3.2 F 0.7 2.8 3.3 Overall rank: 964/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 33.7 2.0 17.4 6. inc.4 F 0.3 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2583/2742 2323/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.8 3.8 2.1 3. level: Reading 3.3 Tests not written (%) 16.4 2.3 2.2 2.9 14. level: Reading 1.000: 2.8 5 5.0 — 2.1 E M 0.9 — 2.3 p Percy Williams [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.2 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 — 2.7 F 0.8 2.6 2.3 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 — Pleasant [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 8.0 — 2.3 56.6 F 0.7 2.4 7.3 3.3 10.9 2.9 2.5 19.3 4.4 2. inc.1 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.8 2.8 — 2.0 36.2 n/a Pape Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.0 3.7 Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 M 0.6 22.7 2.5 2.8 8.2 Tests below standard (%) 70.5 2.700: 1.0 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.0 2.4 2.9 7.8 — 2.7 2.6 2.700: 0.4 3.1 — F 0.1 F 0.7 n/a Math 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 3.4 15. level: Reading 2.9 — 2. of $65.3 F 0.4 5.9 — 6.7 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 8.6 2.2 3.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 10 n/a 6.4 2.5 2.2 3.9 — 2.4 3.8 17.1 n/a M 0.3 2.0 2.1 1.7 Math 2.1 2.9 — 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 2.3 F 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.8 2.0 0.2 — Writing 3.1 3.9 — 5 6.0 2.6 — 2.9 — 3.1 2. level: Reading 3.0 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.1 E — 19.4 2.8 40. inc.100: -1.7 — Palmerston Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 70 ESL (%): 0.8 3.3 n/a n/a M 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.300: -1.4 — 9.4 8.2 n/a M 0.2 n/a 42.5 2.7 q 12.9 — 3.8 2.6 2.300: 0.2 63 Gr 6 enrollment: 86 Special needs (%): 5.3 7.8 2.0 2. level: Reading 1.3 2.4 F 0.4 34.9 Gr 6 avg.9 — 2.5 Gr 6 avg.9 — 3.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 E F 0.7 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.1 18. level: Reading 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 n/a 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 6.8 2.8 7.8 q Pierre-Elliott-Trudeau [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 90.1 0.0 3.1 M 0.0 3.1 2.1 4.9 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 27.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.4 q 2.7 — 2.1 M 0.8 13.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 7.8 3.1 8.7 Math 2. of $29.5 3.0 p Writing 2.2 2. inc.8 2.4 Math 2.8 3.2 Gr 6 avg.0 3.9 2.6 — F 0.0 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.9 2.8 16.6 — 2.6 2.2 F 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 8.0 20.6 — 2.9 — Pauline [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 8.8 — 3.2 F 0.1 Math 2.2 n/a F 0.1 — Math 2.3 3.0 2.1 Math F 0.600: -0.9 21.5 Tests not written (%) 9. inc.6 2.9 2.7 2.0 3.5 n/a Math 3.5 n/a 2.8 — 2.9 q 2.5 — Math M 0.1 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.000: 1.2 p .7 3. of $40.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.9 — 2.2 E F 0.1 0.2 3.5 2.4 q Writing 2.1 2.3 6.3 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.3 3. level: Reading 3.1 40.9 3.8 — 2.5 2.8 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.8 3.6 — 2.3 6.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 14.7 2.4 — F 0.0 3.9 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 28.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.3 2.2 Tests not written (%) 4.3 7.0 Writing 2.4 n/a 22.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.5 3.6 — 2.9 Math 3.4 Tests below standard (%) 42.0 2.0 n/a 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 14. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.3 Math 2.5 8.5 2.2 F 0.9 2.7 2.7 10.8 2.6 — Pauline Johnson [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 8.5 17.9 8.5 — 2.0 Math 2.7 2.9 28.4 2.9 Gr 6 avg.2 Math 1.2 n/a 50.4 Overall rank: 58/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 3.0 n/a Gr 6 avg. of $30.8 8.1 n/a n/a 55.8 — 2.1 2.0 2.9 2.6 Math 2.9 2.9 3.5 n/a 3.1 3.9 7.0 2.0 — 2.7 2. inc.9 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.7 2.3 57.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 0.8 33.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 67 Special needs (%): 9.1 2.1 3.7 2.8 n/a 21.8 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.8 — F 0.3 n/a n/a F 0.9 M 0.3 2.7 17.3 2.2 Math M 0.7 5.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.100: 3. inc.0 p Math 2.3 2.1 3.1 — 5.5 Writing 2.5 2.4 — 2.8 3.9 9.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 q Writing 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 17.0 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Owen [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 19.8 Writing 2.6 2.0 2.5 23.8 q Overall rating out of 10 6.2 Writing 2.4 2.8 — 10.6 n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 — 2.8 6 4.3 M 0.9 q Math 3.1 — 2.4 Math 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 30.1 F 0.1 M 0.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 24.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 — Park Lawn [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 8.0 2.9 3.7 — Writing 3. of $84.8 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 28.5 — 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.5 6.5 q 2.9 2.4 n/a n/a n/a 56. of $55.3 3.9 2.5 8.4 2.7 3.5 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 q M 0.9 Gr 6 avg.4 — 11.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — 60.7 35.2 — Math 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 q 5. level: Reading 2. inc.8 — 2.1 Math M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.5 8.8 Tests not written (%) 8.0 12.0 10. inc.7 — 2.0 3.0 4.7 — 2.9 3.8 Tests not written (%) 6.3 n/a Writing 3.8 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 24.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 20.8 Writing 2. inc.5 23.7 7.8 7.3 — 2.3 F 0.7 — 7.6 2.3 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 2 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 37.3 n/a Tests not written (%) 18. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.9 Writing 2.5 2.3 F 0.5 9.9 2.4 2.6 6.0 3.7 2.0 2.0 4. of $30.7 Writing 2.3 2.4 18.0 — 2.9 2.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.5 13.4 Writing 2.7 Math 2.5 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.4 57.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 2.3 2.9 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 44.3 Math 2.8 — Pineway [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.8 17.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.6 2.4 14.6 — 4.5 p Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 Math 3.0 — 3 5. level: Reading 2.2 — F 0. of $94.9 — Pope Paul [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 14.6 2.3 Math F 0.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.2 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 7.9 6.8 3.9 2.8 3.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 Tests below standard (%) 37.7 2.1 — F 0.9 2.2 F 0.9 — Parkdale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 7.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. level: Reading 3.5 — 2.2 M 0.3 Gr 6 avg.9 3.2 51.0 Special needs (%): 27.3 3. inc.8 10.1 Math M 0.3 — 33.8 17.6 2.7 2.

5 Math F 0.3 F 0.4 Writing 2.2 — F 0.5 2.4 Math 2.2 F 0.5 Math F 0.3 E — Tests below standard (%) 27.0 3.7 2.2 3.6 3.3 3.3 Math M 0.6 M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 2.6 Writing 2.4 8.4 3.1 Special needs (%): 14.8 2.8 10 10 9.0 — 22.1 Tests not written (%) 3.2 7.5 11.3 Tests below standard (%) 50.1 F 0.0 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 12. of $35.7 2.7 21.4 14.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 M 0.6 2.6 — Roden [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 Regent Park/Duke of York [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 2.5 2.1 — Writing 3. of $53.6 1.6 2.6 2.4 — F 0.2 F 0.2 Math M 0.3 Writing 2.5 F 0.9 — Writing 3.4 3.5 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 2.0 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.1 3.6 F 0.1 14.0 17.1 F 0.1 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 44.5 46.7 2.0 2.6 2.2 M 0.3 3.3 4 4.3 37.7 Overall rank: 2508/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.0 3.0 1.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2. of $274.4 2.0 Tests not written (%) 10.1 — 2.7 p 2.9 — Writing 2.3 — 15.2 4.6 — 8. of $24.0 — Writing 2.5 13.8 2.1 F 0.9 3.6 2.5 2.6 2.3 Math 3.2 M 0.1 Math 2.3 8.0 — 3.0 3.2 — 37.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.8 2.5 — Math 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 9 9.1 1.8 28. inc.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.7 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.6 Overall rank: 2638/2742 2303/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 p 2.5 8.1 53.8 3.6 2.9 2.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.7 — 2.7 3.3 E F 0.1 — Queen Victoria [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 11.4 E F 0.2 M 0.4 Math F 0.8 2.2 Writing 3.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 5.2 F 0.0 — Regal Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 4.9 3.3 3.6 4. level: Reading 2.6 2.3 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.6 2.8 — 2. of $41.5 — F 0. of $64.9 9.500: 3.1 Tests not written (%) 16.1 — 37. level: Reading 2.3 E — 33.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — 8.4 Tests below standard (%) 40.8 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.0 — Math 2.1 44.7 2.1 F 0.5 — 2.5 M 0.9 2.0 — Math 3.3 2.3 F 0.100: -2.9 4.2 Tests not written (%) 8.5 E M 0.4 2.3 2.6 2.8 Tests not written (%) 9.6 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 98 Special needs (%): 18.2 n/a n/a F 0.1 2.2 F 0.8 2.5 55.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 11.9 2.8 — Writing 2.0 2.5 q 1.4 — Regent Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 40.3 M 0.6 — 2.1 31.9 — 2.2 21.6 — 2.5 2.8 2.0 Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 4.5 — 3.5 3.6 2.6 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 3.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 F 0.4 F 0.5 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.1 n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.2 — Math 2.5 Overall rank: 295/2742 22/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.5 — Math 2.5 2.3 q 23.0 2.4 2.2 — 1.8 61.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.1 2.4 37.8 — F 0.0 3.6 2.1 2.3 Writing 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.9 32.2 2.5 43.4 6.3 10. inc.700: 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 24.5 2.4 q F 0.9 — Regina Mundi [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 8.0 2.000: -1.1 3.1 M 0.0 3.2 — 2.4 — F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a 28.2 2.6 Gr 6 avg.5 Writing 2.1 3.1 44.3 Special needs (%): 15.0 Math 3.7 2.4 2.5 2.7 — 2.0 16.6 4.2 4.5 — Rockford [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 13.8 3.2 — 5.9 2.4 F 0.1 3.9 — Pringdale Gardens [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 2.0 3.4 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 5.5 — Writing 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 41.6 2.9 3.6 2.0 — 12. of $19. of $37.5 F 0.5 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 — 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.4 2.3 3.7 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 22.6 2.2 Math F 0.6 — F 0.9 — 3.5 2.200: 1.5 Special needs (%): 12.6 Math 2.0 2.0 3.4 2.6 Writing 2.3 — F 0. level: Reading 2.4 — Writing 2.7 q 3.5 2.1 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.6 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Math 2.8 — 2.1 Writing 2.6 2.7 F 0.8 2.2 3.3 3.2 E F 0.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 10.0 3.2 — Rippleton [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 10. level: Reading 2.3 1.8 3.500: 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.64 Port Royal [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 7.6 3.5 F 0.4 3.8 2.2 3.7 2.0 — Math 3.4 Overall rank: 902/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 8. level: Reading 3.1 2.6 — 2.8 2.3 3.2 — 2.3 1. level: Reading 2.6 8.9 38. inc.2 4.1 — Gr 6 avg. inc.7 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Writing 2.9 5.1 2.5 3.1 — 3.2 E F 0.6 2.8 11.200: -1.1 2.4 Math 2.4 3.6 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.3 M 0.7 2.8 q Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 q 5.4 — 0.1 n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.8 Writing 2.0 37.0 3.1 — 2.8 8. level: Reading 2.5 Math 2.4 1.0 3.6 Math 2.900: 0.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 94 Special needs (%): 18.200: 1.8 Math 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.7 2.1 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 13.4 F 0.9 — 2.400: -0.9 — Math 3.5 2.2 — 31.9 40.7 — 2.1 Tests not written (%) 1.4 — 2.7 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.6 2.0 3.3 1.0 3. level: Reading 2.6 2. inc.2 2.5 — .2 2.4 3.5 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.2 — Tests not written (%) 7.7 p 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.8 Tests not written (%) 12.5 F 0.3 3.9 2. inc.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.5 Overall rank: 86/2742 24/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.1 3.8 2.0 — 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 E n/a n/a 13.2 E F 0.0 3.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.6 2.1 Writing 3.4 F 0.4 2.6 34.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 q Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.0 23.5 2.7 — 5.5 q 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 4.9 6.5 — 2.9 2.8 2.3 2.5 2.1 Writing 2.5 2.5 — Math E E M 0.5 — 2.0 0.4 Math 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 F 0.2 3.7 2.6 — 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 — Writing 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.1 — 2.7 2.5 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.7 16.6 2. of $46.6 7 4.3 M 0.1 3.8 2.1 F 0.4 Math 2.2 3.7 Math 2.8 3.0 2.3 25.0 3.7 1.6 2.6 5.2 7.6 2.7 7.1 10.6 p 2.0 7.6 — 2.1 — Math F 0.7 2.0 3.1 22.3 0.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 47.1 17.9 1.6 — 2.2 5.2 7.1 45.8 2.0 26. level: Reading 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 1. level: Reading 2.3 3.5 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.5 2 1.7 — 2.2 E p F 0.4 2.0 — F 0.0 4.8 2.1 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.3 — Tests below standard (%) 46.4 3.4 F 0.9 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 — 5.8 2.1 F 0.3 5. level: Reading 2.6 — 5.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 3.0 3.7 2.2 10 9.0 Writing 3.0 3.9 2.600: -1.5 Math 2.6 Writing 2.2 6.1 Tests below standard (%) 11.3 — F 0.7 — 2.4 q F 0.3 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 46.1 — 10.0 6.3 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 6.3 — M 0.7 Gr 6 avg.2 — 10.6 2. inc.100: -0.2 F 0.1 2.6 12. inc.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 45.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 3.4 6.4 — Rolph Road [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 2.7 2.4 52.0 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 40.3 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 q Writing 3.2 2.9 — 3.5 2.5 2.5 5.8 3.1 2. level: Reading 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.2 M 0.9 2.5 5.9 42.8 3.7 Gr 6 avg.1 M 0.5 2.6 2. inc.0 2.0 3.2 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 3.1 F 0.1 M 0.3 40.1 E F 0.8 q Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 8.1 F 0.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 34.3 1.3 2.6 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 9. inc.6 2.5 2.2 4.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.8 3.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.5 2.6 F 0.3 10.9 2.5 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 2.1 — 30.5 Writing 2.1 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 17.1 2.4 M 0.4 Writing 2.1 1.4 2.8 — 2.3 Writing 2.5 Writing 2.3 2.6 — 5. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.5 — R J Lang [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 22.7 — 2.7 2.5 2.0 2.8 4.7 2.6 2.5 8.5 2.9 3.5 2.9 2.1 2. of $39. inc.4 2.2 Gr 6 avg.2 Special needs (%): 35. of $26.3 5.4 4.4 2.4 45.7 — 6.2 Tests below standard (%) 51. of $38.500: 1.2 3.7 Gr 6 avg.5 Tests not written (%) 8.3 20.1 — 3.4 9.6 2.3 3.5 43.5 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 17.4 F 0.2 7.7 — 2.9 q Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.300: 1.6 — Math 2.5 61.7 2.6 5.5 q 31. level: Reading 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 23.0 2.6 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1642/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $47.1 — Prince of Peace [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 6.6 — F 0.9 2.8 2.0 3.6 2. of $42.1 F 0.8 2.1 F 0.8 — 2.6 Math 2.9 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 6.5 2.9 — 7.2 3.1 44.0 q 3.7 Math 2. level: Reading 2. inc.4 E F 0.9 2.1 15.3 2.1 20.5 Math 2.5 2.7 4. inc.1 — Math M 0.1 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.9 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 11.7 — 2.0 48.5 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.2 n/a E n/a 16.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.3 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.0 Math 3.3 2.8 2.3 — E F 0.7 3. level: Reading 3.6 Math 2.7 8.3 3.8 2.3 F 0.3 n/a E n/a E F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 0.4 4.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 0.0 3.5 3. of $102.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.3 F 0.6 9.0 q 2.700: -1.5 2.2 59.4 Precious Blood [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 65 ESL (%): 20.4 1.1 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2284/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 2.7 2.9 — 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 8.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 26.6 3.3 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 — 2.1 1.2 — Math 3. inc.5 3.8 20.3 — M 0.1 2.8 2.0 28.4 E M 0.6 2.6 42.7 50.8 — Math 3.2 — 13.2 Writing 2.4 2.7 35.2 3. inc.9 2.6 2.2 — F 0.9 3.9 6.8 2.8 — Rawlinson [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 1.4 — Writing 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 9.4 F 0.8 — 2.7 2.5 2.

8 2.7 2.9 Math 3.6 Overall rank: 19/2742 5/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 p Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.2 Writing 2.8 2.6 3.0 3.8 3.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 1.500: 1.3 Math 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 3.8 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.4 F 0. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 3.7 n/a Math n/a 3.9 3.1 n/a n/a 51.0 — Runnymede [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 Gr 6 avg.2 3.900: 0.9 2.9 — 6 6.6 3.8 16.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 9.9 — Writing 2.9 Writing 2.0 3.2 — Math 3.5 3.1 F 0.7 4.7 2.8 Writing 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 22.1 — 2.7 8. inc.3 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 2.2 3. inc. of $138.0 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.5 — Writing 2.5 3.9 — 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 9.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 0.0 5.6 Writing 2.6 Gr 6 avg.7 3.8 3.6 2.8 — 4.0 0.6 3.6 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.9 2.5 2.6 — 2.4 2.6 2.1 n/a F 0.8 Special needs (%): 19.4 3.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.8 2.3 3.5 2.4 2.2 — 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25. inc.7 54.7 p Tests not written (%) 4.4 Tests not written (%) 5.6 3.6 2.8 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc. level: Reading 2.1 — 3.5 2.6 5.7 — Math 2.7 Tests not written (%) 3.6 5.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 2.2 n/a E F 0.5 — 2.9 28. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.700: -1.1 — 1.8 2.4 — 6.8 3.5 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 39/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2. of $136.9 3.6 6.8 2.4 n/a Second Street [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 1.8 2.3 41.1 2.7 — E n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.3 3.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.5 Writing 2.3 — F 0.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 5.500: 4.1 Math M 0.8 Tests not written (%) 12.9 3.4 Math 2.1 Special needs (%): 25.5 6.6 q 6.7 5.6 p Writing 3.6 2.5 3. inc.4 n/a 48.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 3.3 — Writing 3.1 F 0.1 3.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.6 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.2 E F 0.8 Math 3.5 2.6 2.7 Math 2.5 2.8 — F 0.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — 3.2 F 0.1 3.8 Math 2.0 0.3 5.5 Gr 6 avg.2 — 10 10 10 10.9 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 86 Special needs (%): 18.2 Tests not written (%) 0.3 40.4 — Santa Maria [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 4.4 56.3 3.5 F 0.900: 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 10 10 9.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 96 Special needs (%): 13.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 Tests not written (%) 1.9 — Overall rating out of 10 9.9 11.900: 2.4 — Sathya Sai [Private] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.1 20.8 18.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 3.7 2.6 Math 2.4 0.7 3.6 3.9 3.6 2.9 10.0 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1777/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — Math 2.5 — 3.1 Math 2.3 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 1. level: Reading 3.5 Writing 2.2 3.5 Writing 2.8 — 3.7 2.5 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. of $38.6 2.2 E — E F 0.6 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — 3.1 — F 0.6 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.9 3.7 2.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 10 10 10 10.1 E F 0.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.3 — 2.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 49.6 2.6 1.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 Writing 2. inc.6 — 2.0 — 2.9 — Seneca Hill [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 4.3 11.3 1.7 — 8.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.6 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 9.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.8 Gr 6 avg. inc.0 4.9 Tests not written (%) 0.0 3.0 2.9 2.0 3.3 M 0. of $42.7 2.3 35.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 4.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.5 Math 3.1 8. inc. level: Reading 2.1 31.1 p 3. level: Reading n/a 3.4 2.4 3.4 — 5.4 2.8 Writing 3.6 2.2 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.9 3. level: Reading 2.7 2. level: Reading 3.8 3.2 2.3 — 6.6 Math 2.8 — Math 2.4 21. of $28.9 0.9 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 40.1 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 17.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.7 — 4.9 3.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 p 2.3 2.2 3.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.4 3.1 3.3 24.8 — F 0.6 7.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 — 4.4 3.3 2.0 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 65 Rose Avenue [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.600: -0.8 — 2.5 4.5 2.1 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.7 — 2.800: 0.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.9 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 F 0.5 — 2.0 3.4 — Writing 2.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 Math 2.4 2.4 n/a M 0.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.4 q E M 0.7 23.5 E — M 0.4 2.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.0 Tests not written (%) 1.1 3.4 Writing 3.3 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.7 3.4 3.4 2.0 0.0 17.3 F 0.5 p 3. inc.1 15.6 Gr 6 avg.0 3.7 3.2 34.8 2.5 7.6 1.1 — 37.9 — 3.0 Special needs (%): 0.9 6.6 2.5 — F 0.9 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.4 3.6 — 3.8 Special needs (%): 38.6 9.7 3.6 Math 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 5.1 Writing 2.2 — 42.7 4.9 37.0 3.5 8. of $50.2 3. of $64.7 8.8 2.5 2.1 E M 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.7 F 0.7 2.5 2.8 — 2.3 2.7 2.9 3. inc.8 12.8 2.0 2.8 2.0 p 2.3 3.3 2.2 2.7 Writing 2.5 3.8 2.7 2.9 Salaheddin Islamic [Private] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.4 Math 3.0 3.8 7.3 3.1 3.0 38.8 3.2 27.5 6.0 — 2.7 2.3 Overall rank: 1357/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 — 2.4 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 p 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 8 8.3 Tests below standard (%) 33.5 2.6 35. level: Reading 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 3.6 — 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 46.5 3.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 19.4 2.8 3.8 — Writing 2.5 Math 2.4 F 0.2 2.1 3.4 3.1 Math M 0.4 2.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.9 3.1 — 29.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 52.3 2.5 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1/2742 1/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.3 14.4 Writing 2.8 — 10.0 0.9 Gr 6 avg.5 4.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 3.3 F 0.9 — 2.8 2.2 3. level: Reading n/a 3.2 32.5 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 — 2.1 3.8 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 0.1 2.1 F 0.8 — Math 2.7 2. of $37.3 3.5 Overall rank: 1777/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.1 18.9 8. level: Reading 2.6 33.9 2.5 2.6 7.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.2 F 0.2 8.5 7.2 — Gr 6 avg.4 3.8 1.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a n/a 20.3 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.9 2.1 2. of $41.3 7.4 2.2 F 0.0 0.3 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.1 2.9 3.8 Math 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 10.1 — Sainte-Marguerite-d’Youville [Catholic] TorontoGr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 3.3 2.4 3.2 9.4 F 0.000: 1.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Overall rating out of 10 10 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 4.1 3. inc.9 3. inc.7 3.4 Gr 6 avg.6 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Math 2.0 2.6 50.4 — Ryerson [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.100: 2.8 2.2 p F 0.5 — 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $52.3 3.7 — 8.6 Writing 2.2 1.4 2.5 2.2 3.5 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 13.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — 2.2 3.5 4.8 5.4 54.0 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 3.0 2.0 — 2.1 3.6 2. inc.5 6.7 — Gr 6 avg.7 2. of $58.4 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.2 — 3.8 1.5 — . of $24.6 — Tests not written (%) 1.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2.6 15.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 32. level: Reading 3.0 2.5 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 25.8 2.2 5.8 Overall rank: 2393/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Sainte-Madeleine [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 11. inc.6 3.7 Writing 2.4 6.3 Tests not written (%) 10.8 — 2.5 2.8 — F 0.1 — 3.6 p Sacred Heart [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 — 2.6 3.8 n/a Rouge Valley [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.1 M 0.3 F 0.2 2.0 n/a Roselands [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 52.5 3.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math F 0.2 22.5 2.7 — 2.2 — 3.4 4.4 Writing 3.3 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.7 Special needs (%): 22.6 Math 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 26.2 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 44.3 n/a Math n/a 3.7 3.1 3.0 0.5 2.2 E — F 0.7 2.8 3.3 3.3 3. level: Reading 2.1 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 33.5 2.1 32.0 3.7 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 p 2.6 6 8 7.6 3.1 2.0 — Rosedale [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.5 — 2.7 2.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.0 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.500: -1.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.600: 0.0 3.3 10.5 52.4 17.4 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — 0.4 n/a Silver Springs [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 17.1 p 14.5 n/a n/a M 0.

0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.3 2.2 M 0.4 M 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.5 Writing 2. of $56.0 1.8 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.6 2.7 — 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.2 — 46.6 5.8 2.8 F 0.000: -1.7 44.5 Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.1 Math M 0.9 p 2.1 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 p F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 p Math F 0.3 p 2.4 F 0.5 — 2.7 2.6 2.5 3.500: 0.5 p 6.9 — 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 3.3 F 0.1 2.4 1.7 — 2.7 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.6 Math 2.7 3.5 6.0 — 8.7 2.6 n/a F 0.9 8.6 2.6 q 5.4 37.4 2.5 3.5 2.8 2.7 — Math 3.0 2.7 3.9 3.4 — 10.9 3.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 35.5 — F 0.2 E M 0.1 — St Anthony [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 8.6 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.8 Tests not written (%) 9.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 2.2 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 4.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.4 3.7 5.7 2.2 5.1 21.5 Overall rank: 902/2742 177/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 10.5 — 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 3.9 2.7 4.9 — Tests not written (%) 6.0 Tests not written (%) 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 F 0.0 2.7 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 4.6 Writing 2.0 Math 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 12.3 2.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 55.7 2.2 F 0.8 — 2.8 2.3 F 0.300: -0.1 6.9 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 35.3 9.1 — St Albert [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 20.0 7.1 — St Agatha [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 5.5 2.2 5.9 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 14.0 44. inc.7 0.3 2.4 n/a 33. level: Reading 2.4 6.6 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 3 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 11.6 1.3 Math 2.0 3.2 3.5 Math F 0.7 3.5 2.3 2. inc.9 — Writing 2.4 4.1 3.2 M 0.4 F 0.0 2.5 Overall rank: 714/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 11.7 43.8 2.5 2.6 6.6 2.1 9.4 Gr 6 avg.5 2.7 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.1 2.8 2.8 5.0 10.0 2.6 2.3 5.3 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.5 — 2.7 — 5.7 13.2 3. inc.1 n/a n/a 35.2 F 0.1 0.6 Tests not written (%) 8.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 61.3 2.9 Special needs (%): 31.9 — 2.6 2.8 18.5 3.8 — Sprucecourt [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 19.0 3.1 — Math 2.7 5 7.7 — 5.2 3.8 Math 2.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 45.5 2.0 Writing 2.2 25.9 2.1 E n/a Math F 0.9 0.5 2.9 Writing 2.8 2.4 F 0.9 39.2 E p 36.4 n/a E n/a n/a F 0.2 — F 0.0 2.9 — 2.3 F 0.5 2.7 41.8 46.4 2.900: 1.8 2.8 37.5 — 37.7 1.2 Writing 2.0 3.2 — F 0.2 61.0 2.9 3.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.5 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.5 Math 2.7 2.3 Math M 0. level: Reading 2.3 34.1 p 2.6 Overall rank: 714/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.5 2.5 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.0 — 2.2 — 2.1 — 3.8 St Alphonsus [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 5.6 2.8 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 29.8 — Writing 2.3 1.8 2.7 2.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.2 2.9 — 3.4 2. of $46.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.5 20.2 11.3 — Writing 2.7 2.6 — 2.7 6.5 2.6 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.4 1.9 Writing 3.8 2.3 2.3 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 7. of $40.800: 1.0 1.1 Tests below standard (%) 35.9 37.8 — 2.5 — St Agnes [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 5.4 — 2.5 2.6 2.5 — St Anselm [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 3.7 — 8.5 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.0 0.5 14.1 35.7 5.2 n/a n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.4 — 2.1 n/a n/a E n/a 38.200: 0.9 26.0 2.4 23.6 Gr 6 avg.5 Writing 2.3 — 3.6 Writing 2.1 39.6 34.9 — 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2.9 2.8 19. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.9 50.900: 1.6 — Gr 6 avg.1 Math M 0.2 27.9 2.5 p 2.6 2.4 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.3 16.4 F 0.7 42.0 2.3 — 4.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 Tests below standard (%) 55.5 M 0. inc.4 4.4 — Math 2.1 2. level: Reading 1.2 Writing 2.2 4.5 Writing 2.9 2.7 2. inc.5 2.8 2.2 — M 0. of $40. inc.1 F 0.0 2.6 2.4 St Antoine Daniel [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 29.3 2.9 3.7 2.3 F 0.9 Special needs (%): 13.8 1.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.200: 0. level: Reading 2. of $37.5 2.0 3.4 M 0.9 41.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 0.3 F 0.2 3.7 Math 2.7 — Math 2.1 3.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.8 — 2.0 — F 0.7 2.1 2.7 2.1 E F 0.6 2.7 8.3 Writing 2.7 Writing 3.1 F 0.5 5 5 6.7 2.0 Writing 2.2 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 3.8 2.9 2.9 Tests not written (%) 4.3 2.2 11.9 — 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.5 — F 0.7 2.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 20.8 — 2.5 n/a 16.4 3.1 2.6 2.5 n/a St Ambrose [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 7.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Overall rating out of 10 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 2.3 4. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.900: 0.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 18.3 7.3 Writing 2.6 Tests not written (%) 1.7 Special needs (%): 13.4 q Writing 2.1 6.7 — Math 2.8 2.8 2.6 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 29.200: -0.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1970/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 0.5 p St Aidan [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 26.5 2.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 64.3 n/a F 0.9 2.5 F 0.8 2.0 3.2 2.6 Math 2.7 2.2 p 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.6 5.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 18.9 2.4 F 0.6 2.2 M 0.1 — F 0.4 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 49.7 2.9 — 5.2 3.5 2.6 2.0 — 12.8 2.0 9.5 — 2.8 — 2.6 Tests not written (%) 15.7 2.5 — F 0.1 E n/a M 0.1 — Math 3.8 — 2.4 — F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 12.4 2.7 — Writing 2.0 Gr 6 avg.1 Math M 0.4 2.9 Overall rank: 2342/2742 2000/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 Gr 6 avg.6 2.7 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 2.2 — 2.9 2.600: 0. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.9 — 2.3 3.6 2.4 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 Special needs (%): 20.9 2.1 Math 2. of $84.6 2.8 2.8 q Gr 6 avg.4 F 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 21.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2. of $37.3 8.9 2.4 2.2 F 0.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 11.1 2.4 2.2 Writing 2.3 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.8 — Writing 2.1 Writing 2.7 2.6 7.6 2.6 — 3.8 2.2 4.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 q 5.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 8.1 2.2 12.7 2.7 2.9 — St Andrews [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.6 2.7 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.4 1.9 — Gr 6 avg.200: -1.4 2.6 Math 2.6 2.1 3. of $16.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.3 6.3 7.3 2.1 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 8.2 Math 2.3 2.7 Tests not written (%) 8.2 2.2 — M 0.9 2.8 Math 2.8 2.1 2.2 3.3 44.8 2.2 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2.6 2.8 Writing 2.2 2. of $42.5 Gr 6 avg.5 — Writing 2.0 3.0 3. of $55.9 p Math 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E E n/a F 0.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 2.0 17.1 2.1 28.9 2.0 — 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.800: 1.4 E M 0.3 2.9 4.9 p 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 Math 2.7 5.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.2 M 0.6 2.8 Math 2.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 12. level: Reading 2.1 2. of $66.400: 1.8 — .0 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 28. of $78.3 F 0.4 3.7 2.2 F 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2. inc.9 — 2.9 22.5 2. of $52.3 0.8 22.8 2.2 2.2 — 2.5 2.6 — Writing 2.7 6.9 2.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 — Tests not written (%) 3. inc.4 Math M 0.8 — 5.6 Gr 6 avg.400: 0.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 2.6 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.8 2.7 2.3 2.1 42.0 3.4 — 2.2 29.9 5.7 — M 0.6 q F 0.4 Tests below standard (%) 55.3 n/a n/a F 0.5 3.8 40.1 — 3.9 — 2.9 3.1 n/a n/a F 0.5 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.8 30.6 2. inc.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 2.9 — Math 2.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.4 — 2.2 1. inc.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.8 2.5 4.6 Math 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 — 1.8 — St Andrew [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 25.9 29.1 — St Angela [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 6.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 3.2 3.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 17. inc.3 11.0 23.1 n/a F 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 p 2.7 — 2.2 M 0.4 — 2. level: Reading 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Math 2.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 48. of $173.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 49.0 29.7 — 9.7 Math 2.1 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 4. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 5.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 5.6 35. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.2 2.66 Silverthorn [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 — 3.2 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.5 2.2 4.5 44.7 F 0.8 3.1 n/a n/a 17. level: Reading 2.6 Math 2.0 Math 3.9 — 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 10.1 3.5 2.5 2.8 7.0 2.6 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.9 — 2.9 3.9 3.9 3.4 p 8 7.2 11.8 2. inc.1 — 2.0 2.6 — 3.7 2.6 2.5 n/a F 0.4 Math 2. inc.4 Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.2 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 2255/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 24.8 — 2.1 7.9 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.6 Math 2.9 q Overall rating out of 10 7.9 3.6 2.8 2.9 22.1 2.8 — Sir Samuel B Steele [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 3. of $41.5 q 50.

of $59.8 67 Gr 6 enrollment: 69 Special needs (%): 17.2 2.8 3.7 3.3 4.6 n/a F 0.2 F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.8 q St Charles [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.3 62.7 2.3 E n/a Math E n/a M 0.4 — Tests not written (%) 7.3 Math 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.4 — Gr 6 avg. inc.0 3.1 3.4 2. level: Reading 3.9 4.5 2.7 Tests not written (%) 5.7 2.5 — 3.8 2.8 1.1 Tests below standard (%) 62.1 Gr 6 avg.1 2.700: -0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 M 0.3 2.9 0.9 — 2.8 3.4 2.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.9 2.8 Math 2.0 2.8 1.0 7.0 p Overall rating out of 10 9 6. inc.6 F 0.6 2. of $122.8 29.7 2.2 n/a n/a M 0.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.7 n/a 18.4 22.6 — 2. inc.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 F 0.8 — 3.3 2.4 2.5 Tests not written (%) 2.6 5.5 38.4 2.3 — St Clement [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.2 — Gr 6 avg.1 0.1 3.1 2.7 5.7 p 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.8 2.2 Math 2.1 — 19. level: Reading 2.5 0.7 33.0 48.7 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 18.0 2.1 2.0 Special needs (%): 30.5 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 2.3 2.8 3.5 Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 6.6 2.9 Writing 2.6 — St Bonaventure [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 11.6 — Writing 3. level: Reading 3.1 p 2.6 Overall rank: 98/2742 32/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.5 2. of $93.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.0 2.2 4.5 2. of $74.9 2.6 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 q 6.9 Writing 2.200: -0.9 2.7 n/a Math 2.5 2.6 2.2 40.2 — 0.8 p E E E E — M 0.7 — 2.1 15.5 8.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 69 Special needs (%): 23.6 — Overall rating out of 10 8.8 2.9 5.5 18.8 n/a 2.1 2. of $136.8 — 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.5 Writing 2.500: 0.5 n/a M 0.8 — 2.8 8.0 2.7 5.8 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 4.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 3.7 — Math 2.8 Overall rank: 475/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.700: 1. level: Reading 2.7 q Writing 3.4 3.2 7. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 n/a 2.7 2.6 — St Brendan [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 4.7 2.5 2.0 2.8 2.9 — St Benedict [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 6.0 Special needs (%): 12.1 3.5 26.8 2.4 n/a Math M 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 2270/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 38.900: 0.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.9 2.9 4.4 5. level: Reading 3.0 — 2.2 Overall rank: 511/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 3.1 Math 2.6 — Writing 2.7 6.9 2. level: Reading 2.5 4.3 2.5 F 0.1 3.8 3.9 — 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 6.3 2.5 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2. inc.4 Tests below standard (%) 42.4 2. inc.9 — Math 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 — Writing 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.3 Writing 2.6 2.4 26.9 2.2 E M 0.8 2.1 Math M 0.100: 1.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 M 0.100: -0.2 n/a M 0.9 38. level: Reading 1.4 — Math 3.6 — St Barnabas [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 5.8 2.1 n/a 21.3 — 2.3 n/a 5.8 2.1 n/a n/a Math M 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Special needs (%): 9.2 3.6 2. level: Reading 3.8 2.9 3.5 2.5 p F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 M 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 7 5.7 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.5 — Writing 2.2 — Math 3.9 2.1 n/a M 0.9 2.0 3.8 Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.3 2.8 — 2.3 3.9 2.5 p 2.2 2.0 3.3 n/a F 0.9 3.0 — 2.0 4. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.7 Math 2.5 — 2.0 — 2.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 44.7 2.1 M 0.0 3.2 F 0.4 p 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 — 2.9 38.1 3.7 — Math 2.6 1.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 3.6 5 5.4 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 0.7 33.000: 1.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 1.4 Writing 2.8 2.2 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.3 M 0. level: Reading 3.7 2.0 1.1 M 0.2 3.0 3.8 3.1 2.7 2.1 3.2 F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 6.6 2.0 3.9 2.7 2.6 p 2.2 M 0.2 n/a F 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 66 Special needs (%): 12.5 q 6 6.9 — M 0.1 — Writing 3. inc.1 F 0.2 E F 0.7 2. inc.9 2.7 p 2.5 2.5 3.8 2.4 3.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 8.9 — Math 2.2 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.2 7.7 Math 2.0 0. inc.0 — 7.7 — 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.400: 0.7 2.3 8.7 35.8 n/a Writing 3.7 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — 1.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 3.4 F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.6 2.9 Math 2.4 n/a Math E n/a F 0.2 3. of $53.7 2.5 p 3.8 2.7 2.5 3.1 2.6 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.9 n/a Math 2.8 2.4 F 0.5 2.8 38.1 3. of $38. level: Reading 2. inc.6 Writing 2.5 6.8 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.7 2.4 2.6 Math 2.5 18.9 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.2 F 0. of $67.4 Gr 6 avg.0 18.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 83 Special needs (%): 13.5 n/a St Barbara [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 6.8 2.6 2.7 2.2 3. of $42.5 — Overall rating out of 10 4.7 0.0 — Math 3.2 2.4 40.4 28.9 2.4 4.5 Writing 2. inc.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 2.3 7.9 4.8 2.5 F 0.6 — Math 2.1 20.7 2.5 2.1 2.6 Math 2.1 — 30.2 3. of $39.2 7.7 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.9 p St Bernard [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 8.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 16.4 p 2.4 3. inc.7 2.2 — F 0.5 F 0.3 5.0 3.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E E F 0.3 Gr 6 avg.2 Math F 0. inc.9 3.6 — 2.6 2.2 3.5 3.7 6.1 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.3 n/a 3.9 0.1 F 0.4 2.7 2.1 Writing 2.5 — 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 27.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.5 2.2 36.1 3.1 5 5.7 2.8 n/a Writing 2.5 2.0 4.3 Writing 2.7 — Math 3.5 3.3 — 4.7 2.6 4.6 2.5 Math 2.7 p 2.2 Math 1.2 34.8 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.5 2.7 3.1 57.7 10.4 2.3 2.2 2.9 Tests not written (%) 6. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 F 0.2 — 2.8 — 3.5 3.5 1.5 2.5 n/a n/a 27.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 Math F 0.3 — Gr 6 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2.100: 0.7 F 0.9 2.1 p .5 2.8 — St Columba [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 16.1 3.1 Writing 2.7 Writing 2.3 0.6 3.0 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 2.1 3.3 n/a M 0.1 — Math M 0.4 — St Clare [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 12.3 2. level: Reading 2.6 2. of $37.8 2. level: Reading 3.5 2.2 — F 0.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 7.4 Writing 2.3 — M 0.6 27.3 n/a M 0.1 — Math 3.1 n/a M 0. of $55.9 — 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.7 2.2 E — 37.4 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 25.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.4 1.8 Special needs (%): 27.0 Tests not written (%) 0.6 2.0 3.9 — Writing 2.6 2.9 3.0 2. inc.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 2.1 2.0 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 0.0 2. level: Reading 2.5 St Bede [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 3.0 2. level: Reading 3.0 3.2 F 0.6 2.1 Tests not written (%) 0.5 8.9 6.5 — Writing 2.5 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.0 3.6 — F 0.6 6 3.1 Writing 2.9 3. level: Reading 1.8 2.2 22.1 M 0.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.0 — 1.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 7.6 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy St Augustine [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 23.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 3.9 3.4 — F 0.5 2.9 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 n/a F 0.4 2.5 26.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 33.4 2.5 7.2 3.5 2.6 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 0.5 2.6 2.5 Tests below standard (%) 41.8 6. inc.8 5.0 23.800: 2.6 6. level: Reading 2.7 27.5 F 0.4 — Tests not written (%) 5.9 2.4 2.9 n/a 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 3.3 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.8 2.1 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 26.1 F 0.0 — St Boniface [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 3.1 3.2 F 0.2 p 1.6 2.1 3.0 3.4 1.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.9 2.9 2.0 — 7 7 7.4 F 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.5 — Writing 2.4 — F 0.3 F 0.7 2.9 — 2.9 2.5 7.2 1. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Writing 3.5 Math F 0.4 36.1 E F 0.5 3.800: 0.1 — 43.9 Gr 6 avg.9 Writing 2.1 F 0.1 2.1 3.7 2.0 Writing 2.7 2.3 Math 2.6 2.600: 1.1 1.2 n/a 3.8 n/a 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.6 3.2 F 0.4 1.7 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) 6.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 10.2 p 4.3 3.7 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.5 7.6 — 5.5 — 2.1 3.9 p St Cecilia [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 6.4 — 2.3 2.2 2.5 — E E F 0.6 Gr 6 avg.9 35. level: Reading 2.0 3.1 Math M 0.1 M 0.3 — E M 0.6 2.8 2.5 — 2.4 21.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 7.3 F 0.8 Math 2.4 2.4 — 2.7 2.0 3.4 F 0.5 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2.0 3.5 2.2 — 60.4 Math F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 2. of $44.0 2.6 p 2.0 1.6 n/a 8.4 Overall rank: 396/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.6 5.8 — 2.200: 0.7 — E n/a F 0.8 — 2.6 53.1 33.8 — 3.2 — 3.8 Tests not written (%) 0.6 4.1 — Math 3.7 20.6 24.0 3.2 3.7 2.5 M 0.6 — Math 2.9 2.0 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. of $62.3 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 23.2 2.7 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 76.3 Math 1.1 — 2.5 5.2 — 52.2 3.6 8.7 F 0. of $41.6 2.6 2.7 — 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.6 2.8 Math 2.4 1. level: Reading 2.7 Special needs (%): 6.7 F 0.4 34.2 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.2 1.3 Overall rating out of 10 1.1 F 0.7 8.9 2.8 — 2.8 — Writing 3.6 2.3 9.7 2.0 2.7 — 2.6 Math 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 47.2 — M 0.600: 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 2.7 46.9 Writing 2.1 2.9 2.6 40.8 2.8 — 2.2 7.3 16.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 6.8 2.3 10 9.1 7.2 3.8 2.1 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 Tests not written (%) 0.5 42. level: Reading 2.2 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1443/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — Writing 3.0 2.6 p St Brigid [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.

100: -0.4 2.1 n/a 7. level: Reading 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.4 4.6 — 3.9 2.4 3.7 n/a 3.6 2.3 2.8 2.8 7. level: Reading 2.0 1.3 2.1 24.6 — 2.7 Writing 2.5 2.6 n/a Math M 0.6 — Math 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 5.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 17.8 Tests not written (%) 11.6 q Overall rating out of 10 5.6 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 3.2 F 0.8 2.9 2.0 2.1 2.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 73 Special needs (%): 19.4 Tests below standard (%) 44.8 3. of $49. level: Reading 2.3 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.1 M 0.2 3.7 2.5 41.2 5.3 3.3 2.4 15.0 2.9 54.3 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 n/a F 0.400: 1.7 n/a 2.2 10.5 2.2 13.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.8 4.3 3.0 p 2.8 2.1 2.2 M 0.1 — 2.0 2.2 9.0 3. level: Reading n/a 2.0 — Math 2.2 q Writing 2.6 3.6 — .8 9.3 2.9 2.6 n/a 2.4 — Writing 2.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.3 Overall rank: 714/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.9 n/a 3.9 — Tests not written (%) 11.1 Special needs (%): 21.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 3.2 p Writing 3.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 9.5 2. level: Reading 2.500: 0.9 — Writing 2.0 46.5 2.6 n/a 34.1 2.1 — St Dorothy [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 16.1 2.9 2.8 2. inc.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0. inc.8 2. inc.9 — Math 3. inc.9 2.2 M 0.2 M 0.9 7.1 — St Elizabeth [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 14.1 St Elizabeth Seton [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 7.5 E n/a n/a n/a 50.2 2.3 — St Demetrius [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 18.1 9. inc.1 40.2 25.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 50.8 — 2.2 n/a 2.5 2.6 Writing 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.2 3.8 2.3 2.9 — F 0.4 11.5 4.4 — Writing 2.8 — Math 2.7 2.9 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.9 2.2 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 6.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.4 Special needs (%): 11.4 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 Overall rank: 261/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 n/a 2.8 2.4 — Math 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.7 n/a St Francis Xavier [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 9.6 n/a 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.5 4.7 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.400: 2.4 n/a 2.5 2.0 3.1 2.5 1.5 0.6 45. level: Reading 2.0 2.8 Gr 6 avg.8 Math 2.5 — 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 E n/a n/a Math E F 0.6 3.9 p 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.4 3.5 2.6 2.4 Overall rank: 843/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.1 2.000: -0.9 3. level: Reading 2.8 3. of $39.2 p 1.3 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 3. level: Reading 3.5 n/a 7.8 39.6 8.8 — 6.8 2.6 3.1 2.5 4.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.8 5.5 2.2 24.7 F 0.200: 1.5 Special needs (%): 13.3 2.3 — E M 0.5 — Math 2.4 4.7 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 4.7 4.9 1.7 2. inc.5 — Writing 2.5 2.9 q Writing 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5. of $30.9 3.6 — 6 7.1 7.8 2.7 n/a 2.5 Math 2.4 3.0 p Math 2.5 n/a 15.3 0.1 2.8 — St Dunstan [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 34.6 2.1 41.1 n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 n/a 5.6 2.9 2.1 Overall rank: 121/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 — Math 3. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.6 n/a 2.9 2.3 2.0 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 11.6 n/a 8.6 2.3 3.5 2.9 — 12.2 Overall rank: 1610/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 n/a F 0.6 2.8 2.0 2. of $143.2 n/a St Francis de Sales [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 11.4 — Tests below standard (%) 36.2 3.0 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.5 Special needs (%): 12. level: Reading 2.9 2.7 3.9 3.5 32.4 2.7 3. inc.4 Writing 2.6 21.300: 1.3 6 6.6 2.0 5.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.8 3.1 32.0 p Math 2.9 44.7 2.2 F 0.0 2.0 p St Denis [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.3 9 8.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 3.1 n/a F 0.3 n/a Writing 2.2 0.1 2.1 24.000: 2.7 — F 0.0 1.2 2.7 2.0 32.9 2.0 5.0 2.9 3.2 — Math F 0.1 — 30.5 — Writing 2.8 2.5 Gr 6 avg.9 — St Fidelis [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 6.9 3. of $47.6 — Overall rating out of 10 5 2.2 F 0.0 — Writing 2.0 3.4 F 0.9 — Gr 6 avg.2 18.5 E n/a F 0.6 2.4 Math F 0.5 14.6 Overall rank: 843/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 7.700: 1.5 2.8 2.7 2.500: -2.2 3.1 2.9 — Math 2.3 F 0.5 17.7 — 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 n/a St Florence [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 4.8 21.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 41.8 0.8 2.4 — 2.4 2.8 n/a 2.5 3.2 F 0.5 2.2 3.6 2. inc. level: Reading 3.9 2.4 4.3 2.8 3.0 — 2.6 2.4 2.0 p 2.600: -1.6 Special needs (%): 13.0 2.0 7.6 2.7 Math 2.5 — Writing 2.7 3.5 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.3 3.1 — Writing 2.8 2.3 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 27.7 31.6 6. of $34.9 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Math 2.1 2.8 8.9 p Writing 2.7 2.2 n/a F 0.1 3.7 39.8 2.4 Special needs (%): 31.3 Special needs (%): 19.1 8.0 0. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 22 Special needs (%): 18.68 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Conrad [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 5.8 — Writing 2.8 1.5 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2458/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 11.9 — St Eugene [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 3.8 2.1 3.1 — Math 2.1 Overall rank: 186/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 2.7 n/a 2.8 2.4 3.9 3. of $63.2 2.9 2.600: 1.1 6.0 2.4 4.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 2.3 2.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.8 24.4 2.7 6 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 n/a Math 2.6 5.1 Overall rank: 1777/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.9 — 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 — Gr 6 avg.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.1 3.8 7. inc.0 — Math 3.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.6 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.3 Writing 2.6 n/a 2.8 — 2. level: Reading n/a 2.1 3.9 Math 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 q Overall rating out of 10 4.3 2.1 2.6 F 0.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.1 Overall rank: 2564/2742 2101/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 27.6 31. level: Reading 2.700: -1.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.6 M 0.5 2.7 2.6 2.9 Writing 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 30.5 — St Edward [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 13.8 n/a Math n/a 2.7 3.3 2.1 n/a F 0.4 n/a St Dominic Savio [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 12.7 2.1 2.8 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.7 2.3 2.2 F 0.4 2.9 — Math 2.2 7.0 n/a 2.6 2.7 7.8 3.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 3.6 3. of $74.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 33.4 32.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.6 2.0 44.6 Math F 0.5 5.3 6.8 Tests not written (%) 2.8 2.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.9 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.0 3.6 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 2.6 0.5 2. level: Reading 2.7 n/a Writing 2.100: -0.4 6.3 F 0.0 13.7 18.8 Math 2.3 F 0.9 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 7.4 2.5 36.9 2.2 2.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 2.5 — F 0.6 6.6 2.0 2.8 — St Edmund Campion [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 11.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.9 3.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 35.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 20.600: 0.7 2.9 n/a 3.2 6 5.2 52.3 2. of $48.0 0.9 n/a 3.6 2.3 2.2 30.8 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 15.9 0. of $64.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 Math 2.2 3.8 3.3 5. of $91. level: Reading 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 3.7 2.5 2. inc.6 2.3 3.6 4.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 2.3 n/a 6.2 4.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 47.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.2 Special needs (%): 6.7 28.2 3.5 2.9 2.7 — 2.5 2.1 2.8 5.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 38.8 — Writing 2.5 2.5 3.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 46.5 2.5 2.7 0.6 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6 4.9 2.9 2. of $44. inc.0 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 3.5 7.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.1 8.5 — 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.4 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.1 E F 0.8 — 2.1 n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 Special needs (%): 14.0 p Gr 6 avg.7 2.8 2.6 6.6 43.2 p Writing 2.8 5.1 3.8 2.0 n/a 3.2 n/a 17.5 2.5 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 5.0 2.8 25.7 3.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 53.0 2.5 2. inc.8 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 27.1 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.1 3.6 0.1 4.1 2.8 3.4 — Gr 6 avg.7 3.5 2.3 Tests not written (%) 6.4 4.2 3.2 5.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.1 3.5 40.7 4.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.6 2.1 5.6 2.8 Overall rank: 2393/2742 1970/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.9 2. of $51.0 2.6 2.3 1.8 — Writing 3.2 54. inc.1 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — 2.5 F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.1 3. of $107.0 3.7 2.0 2.6 Gr 6 avg.7 n/a Math 2.8 2.0 6.0 1.8 2. of $67.7 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.2 7.4 2.8 0.8 Special needs (%): 8.

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy

St Gabriel [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 18.9
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $88,200: -0.6
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3
Math
E
Tests below standard (%)
34.1
Tests not written (%)
11.0
Overall rating out of 10
6.2

69

Gr 6 enrollment: 37
Special needs (%): 13.5
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1610/2742 738/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 —
2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 p
2.9 2.9 2.7 2.8 —
3.0 3.0 2.9 2.6 —
3.1 3.2 3.0 2.8 —
3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 —
F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.6 F 0.5 —
M 0.1 F 0.3
E F 0.3 —
24.1 18.6 20.7 31.8 —
6.6 6.5 3.5 16.0 —
7.3 7.6 7.2 5.7 —

St Helen [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 1.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $47,700: 1.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.8
Math
2.6
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.7
Math
2.6
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
M 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
38.5
Tests not written (%)
12.2
Overall rating out of 10
5.9

Gr 6 enrollment: 62
Special needs (%): 16.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 667/2742 571/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.9 2.7 2.4 —
2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 —
2.8 3.0 2.8 2.4 —
2.9 2.8 3.0 3.2 p
2.9 2.9 2.9 3.2 —
3.0 2.7 3.3 3.3 p
F 0.3 F 0.2
E F 0.1 —
E F 0.2
E
E —
23.2 21.0 24.0 26.6 —
12.2 13.6 14.9 11.0 —
7.4 7.5 7.5 7.2 —

St Jean de Brebeuf [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 40
ESL (%): 12.5
Special needs (%): 12.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $56,300: 0.6
Overall rank: 1215/2742 1054/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 —
Writing
3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 q
Math
2.7 3.1 2.9 2.8 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.6 —
Writing
2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
Math
2.9 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a F 0.4 n/a F 0.4
E n/a
Math
n/a F 0.1 n/a F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
29.3 28.7 33.3 33.9 31.2 q
Tests not written (%)
7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.9 6.3 6.3 5.7 6.3 —

St Gabriel Lalemant [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 44
ESL (%): 18.2
Special needs (%): 9.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $50,100: 0.6
Overall rank: 1285/2742 929/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.4 —
Writing
2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 —
Math
2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 p
Writing
2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 —
Math
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 p
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a F 0.3 n/a F 0.3 n/a
Math
n/a n/a F 0.1 n/a F 0.4 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
37.8 32.8 30.6 19.1 25.8 —
Tests not written (%)
10.1 2.9 1.4 1.2 2.4 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.8 6.2 6.6 7.5 6.2 —

St Henry [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 3.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $51,100: 4.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
3.4
Math
3.1
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.2
Writing
3.3
Math
3.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3
Math
M 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
10.9
Tests not written (%)
3.2
Overall rating out of 10
9.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 28
Special needs (%): 0.0
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1/2742
10/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
3.0 3.3 3.0 3.3 —
3.2 3.5 3.5 3.4 —
3.2 3.5 3.5 3.6 p
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.6 p
3.3 3.1 3.5 3.6 —
3.5 3.4 3.6 3.7 —
F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a
M 0.1 F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a
6.4 11.3 7.4 0.5 —
4.2 13.8 0.0 1.5 —
9.7 9.8 10 10.0 —

St Jerome [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 10.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,700: 1.8
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.7
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.4
Math
2.4
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
44.7
Tests not written (%)
3.6
Overall rating out of 10
5.1

St Gerald [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 4.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $51,400: 1.3
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
3.0
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
32.4
Tests not written (%)
4.2
Overall rating out of 10
6.3

Gr 6 enrollment: 25
Special needs (%): 20.0
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 843/2742 929/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.3 2.4 3.1 2.7 —
2.4 2.8 3.0 2.8 —
2.5 2.7 3.1 2.9 —
2.8 2.5 3.1 3.0 —
2.7 2.6 3.1 2.9 —
2.9 2.8 3.3 2.8 —
F 0.4 n/a F 0.5 n/a n/a
F 0.1 n/a M 0.1 n/a n/a
41.4 39.6 7.7 26.5 —
5.7 1.5 4.7 2.2 —
5 5.3 8.8 6.9 —

St Isaac Jogues [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 40
ESL (%): 22.5
Special needs (%): 7.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $43,400: 0.6
Overall rank: 1431/2742 929/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.5 —
Writing
2.6 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.8 —
Math
2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.8 —
Writing
3.0 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 —
Math
2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.0 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a F 0.1 M 0.1
E M 0.5 n/a
Math
n/a M 0.3 F 0.3
E M 0.4 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
37.5 28.1 28.4 24.1 26.3 —
Tests not written (%)
1.8 0.0 6.9 1.9 2.1 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.8 6.5 6.7 7.4 6.0 —

St Joachim [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 19
ESL (%): 10.5
Special needs (%): 10.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $38,500: 1.5
Overall rank: 843/2742 1767/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 —
Writing
2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
Math
2.2 2.7 2.9 3.1 2.9 p
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.9 —
Writing
2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 —
Math
2.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.9 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a
E n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
49.7 48.1 42.6 42.3 25.0 p
Tests not written (%)
0.0 1.9 0.0 6.8 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.8
4 5.3 4.9 6.9 p

St Gerard Majella [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 16
ESL (%): 18.8
Special needs (%): 12.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $36,400: -2.7
Overall rank: 2621/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.9 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 53.5 n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.0 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 n/a

St James [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 23
ESL (%): 8.7
Special needs (%): 43.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $38,500: 3.0
Overall rank: 212/2742 571/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.5 2.6 3.3 3.3 —
Writing
3.0 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.3 p
Math
3.1 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.6 p
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.8 2.2 2.8 2.6 —
Writing
2.4 2.8 2.5 3.0 2.8 —
Math
2.6 2.8 2.2 2.8 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a
E n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a
E n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
30.5 27.4 47.3 19.3 19.9 —
Tests not written (%)
2.9 4.3 0.0 5.9 4.1 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.7 6.9 4.8 8.6 8.4 —

St John [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 1.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $113,900: -0.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.9
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.6
Math
2.6
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
32.6
Tests not written (%)
1.1
Overall rating out of 10
6.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 55
Special needs (%): 7.3
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1357/2742 929/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.8 2.6 2.9 2.6 —
3.1 2.8 2.7 2.8 —
3.0 2.7 2.9 2.8 —
2.8 2.8 2.6 2.7 q
2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 —
2.6 2.6 2.6 2.8 —
F 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.6 F 0.2 —
E
E F 0.4 M 0.2 —
20.7 30.6 28.1 27.6 —
2.1 0.0 1.6 2.8 —
7.6 6.6 5.7 6.1 —

St Gregory [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 2.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $149,100: 0.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.8
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
F 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
31.0
Tests not written (%)
4.2
Overall rating out of 10
6.5

St Jane Frances [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 96
ESL (%): 11.5
Special needs (%): 20.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $38,200: -1.2
Overall rank: 2311/2742 2101/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.7 p
Writing
2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.8 —
Math
2.0 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 p
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.6 2.1 2.5 2.3 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.6 q
Math
2.3 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.9 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 —
Math
M 0.1 F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.1
E —
Tests below standard (%)
58.8 43.8 56.3 50.8 49.7 —
Tests not written (%)
13.9 9.8 13.3 5.6 6.3 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.5 4.5 3.8 3.9 4.1 —

St John Bosco [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 3.3
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $44,000: -2.6
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.8
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
1.9
Writing
2.3
Math
2.0
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
E
Tests below standard (%)
63.2
Tests not written (%)
16.7
Overall rating out of 10
3.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 30
Special needs (%): 20.0
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2583/2742 2172/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
3.0 2.2 2.0 2.5 —
2.6 2.8 2.5 2.4 q
3.0 2.4 2.1 2.1 —
2.5 2.6 2.5 2.7 —
2.6 2.5 2.5 2.7 —
2.2 2.4 1.9 2.1 —
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
34.4 44.7 60.9 55.6 —
26.7 17.7 6.1 3.1 —
5.6 4.3 1.9 2.9 —

Gr 6 enrollment: 72
Special needs (%): 5.6
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 261/2742 409/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.8 2.8 2.8 3.1 p
2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 p
3.0 3.0 3.2 3.3 p
2.7 2.8 2.8 3.0 p
2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 —
2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 —
F 0.3 F 0.2
E F 0.4 —
M 0.2 F 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.1 —
21.3 23.7 20.5 13.4 p
0.0 0.6 2.2 0.8 —
7.2 7.5 7.7 8.2 p

Gr 6 enrollment: 49
Special needs (%): 14.3
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 623/2742 929/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.9 2.7 3.0 2.8 —
3.0 2.9 3.2 2.8 —
3.0 3.1 3.3 2.8 —
2.7 2.7 2.6 3.0 —
2.6 3.0 2.7 3.0 —
2.5 2.7 2.5 2.7 —
F 0.4 F 0.5 F 0.1 F 0.2 —
F 0.1 F 0.1 M 0.1
E p
31.8 26.0 30.7 22.3 —
3.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 p
6.3 6.9
7 7.3 p

70

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010

St John the Evangelist [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 52
ESL (%): 13.5
Special needs (%): 11.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $41,900: 0.8
Overall rank: 1285/2742 1599/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.8 —
Writing
2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 —
Math
2.8 2.5 2.8 2.8 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.4 —
Writing
2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 p
Math
2.2 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.5 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 F 0.3 F 0.2 M 0.1
E p
Math
F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.3 M 0.2 M 0.1 —
Tests below standard (%)
42.0 53.3 34.8 27.7 33.4 —
Tests not written (%)
3.7 5.3 3.5 2.6 5.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.9 3.6 5.8 6.5 6.2 —

St Leo [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 30
ESL (%): 13.3
Special needs (%): 13.3
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $46,800: -2.9
Overall rank: 2621/2742 1767/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.3 2.8 2.7 2.1 —
Writing
2.7 2.7 2.9 3.2 2.5 —
Math
2.7 2.6 3.2 3.1 2.6 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.4 —
Writing
2.3 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 —
Math
2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.4 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 n/a
Math
M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
45.1 45.7 29.2 25.4 50.0 —
Tests not written (%)
4.5 8.8 6.6 6.0 1.9 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.6 4.1 6.7 7.1 2.6 —

St Marcellus [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 13.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $57,100: -1.9
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.1
Writing
2.3
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.2
Writing
2.3
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
F 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
54.6
Tests not written (%)
1.1
Overall rating out of 10
3.8

Gr 6 enrollment: 38
Special needs (%): 10.5
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2393/2742 1970/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.4 2.6 2.5 2.5 —
2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 —
2.7 3.0 2.5 2.3 —
2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 —
2.7 2.5 2.5 2.7 —
2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 —
F 0.5 n/a F 0.1 F 0.4 n/a
F 0.3 n/a F 0.2 F 0.4 n/a
39.4 37.1 46.7 46.8 —
5.7 2.7 0.0 6.0 —
4.9 5.5 4.3 3.8 —

St John Vianney [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 48
ESL (%): 6.3
Special needs (%): 10.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $41,600: 1.5
Overall rank: 843/2742 2000/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.5 1.7 2.7 2.9 —
Writing
2.7 2.7 2.3 2.7 3.0 —
Math
2.4 2.6 2.2 2.6 3.2 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.7 —
Writing
2.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.7 —
Math
2.6 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.7 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 F 0.3 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a
E M 0.2 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
42.7 47.3 66.1 43.5 20.5 —
Tests not written (%)
13.9 4.3 13.0 0.0 0.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.3 3.5 1.3 5.1 6.9 —

St Louis [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 8.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $59,400: 2.2
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
38.7
Tests not written (%)
3.4
Overall rating out of 10
5.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 25
Special needs (%): 28.0
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 330/2742 1124/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.4 2.7 2.7 3.0 p
2.6 2.9 2.9 3.1 p
2.3 3.1 3.1 3.3 p
2.5 2.6 2.6 2.8 —
2.6 2.8 2.6 3.0 —
2.4 2.9 2.4 2.6 —
F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a
F 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
48.6 27.4 33.3 20.4 —
11.3 8.2 5.7 12.4 —
4.3 7.2 5.9 8.0 —

St Margaret [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 21.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $62,900: 1.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.8
Math
3.3
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
27.7
Tests not written (%)
4.7
Overall rating out of 10
7.2

Gr 6 enrollment: 83
Special needs (%): 3.6
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 843/2742 688/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.9 2.2 2.6 2.7 —
3.0 2.5 3.0 2.9 —
2.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 —
2.9 2.5 2.9 3.0 —
3.0 2.7 3.0 3.1 —
2.9 2.6 3.0 2.9 —
F 0.1 F 0.2
E F 0.5 —
E
E M 0.1 F 0.4 —
18.2 45.9 20.7 20.8 —
12.6 2.7 14.9 8.3 —
8.1 4.8 7.5 6.9 —

St Jude [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 12.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $35,400: 0.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
2.9
Math
3.0
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.5
Math
2.6
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3
Math
F 0.4
Tests below standard (%)
35.3
Tests not written (%)
3.5
Overall rating out of 10
5.9

Gr 6 enrollment: 55
Special needs (%): 18.2
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1610/2742 1642/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.4 2.8 2.1 2.5 —
2.8 2.8 2.5 2.7 q
2.5 3.0 2.4 3.0 —
2.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 —
2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 —
2.8 2.6 2.5 2.8 —
F 0.3 F 0.4 F 0.1 F 0.3 —
E F 0.1 M 0.2
E —
38.9 38.5 48.9 34.5 —
5.8 0.0 3.8 2.6 —
5.5 5.5 3.9 5.7 —

St Luigi [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 46
ESL (%): 8.7
Special needs (%): 17.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $39,100: -2.3
Overall rank: 2564/2742 2083/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.4 —
Writing
2.5 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 —
Math
2.5 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.0 —
Writing
2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.5 —
Math
2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.1 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 n/a M 0.1 n/a M 0.2 n/a
Math
F 0.3 n/a M 0.2 n/a M 0.3 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
49.5 56.2 41.3 34.0 51.4 —
Tests not written (%)
5.0 6.4 7.8 19.7 4.3 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.7 2.9 5.3 5.5 3.1 —

St Margaret’s [Public] Toronto
ESL (%): 15.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $25,400: -2.6
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2
Writing
2.4
Math
2.2
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.5
Math
2.2
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7
Math
F 0.3
Tests below standard (%)
58.3
Tests not written (%)
14.7
Overall rating out of 10
2.9

Gr 6 enrollment: 38
Special needs (%): 21.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2634/2742 2204/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 —
2.5 2.6 2.4 2.5 —
2.3 2.7 2.7 2.6 —
2.4 2.5 2.5 2.2 —
2.4 2.6 2.7 2.3 —
2.3 2.3 2.4 2.0 —
F 0.4 F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.6 —
F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 p
52.0 48.4 47.1 56.5 —
0.4 1.8 1.4 1.3 —
3.4 4.7 4.2 2.5 —

St Kevin [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 10.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $55,500: 1.0
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.8
Math
3.0
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
2.9
Math
3.3
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
16.8
Tests not written (%)
17.4
Overall rating out of 10
8

Gr 6 enrollment: 28
Special needs (%): 10.7
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 964/2742 738/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.3 2.7 2.7 —
2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 —
2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 —
3.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 q
2.9 2.7 2.9 2.8 q
3.2 2.7 2.6 2.9 —
F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a
F 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
17.1 37.3 30.2 23.7 —
11.6 7.4 6.7 5.5 p
7.8 5.4 6.1 6.7 —

St Luke [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 5.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $56,500: -0.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.7
Math
2.9
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
Math
M 0.3
Tests below standard (%)
35.4
Tests not written (%)
3.1
Overall rating out of 10
5.9

Gr 6 enrollment: 40
Special needs (%): 10.0
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1655/2742 1642/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.2 2.3 2.1 —
2.8 2.5 2.5 2.6 —
2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5 —
2.7 2.7 2.3 2.9 —
2.8 2.9 2.6 2.8 —
2.7 2.7 2.1 3.0 —
F 0.4 F 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.3 —
F 0.2
E F 0.4 F 0.2 —
31.4 33.2 50.0 32.5 —
6.2 1.9 5.4 4.6 —
5.9 5.8 3.5 5.6 —

St Maria Goretti [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 125
ESL (%): 17.6
Special needs (%): 5.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $41,000: 0.5
Overall rank: 1499/2742 997/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.5 —
Writing
2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 —
Math
2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 —
Writing
2.7 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 —
Math
2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.5 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
E F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.1 —
Math
M 0.1
E M 0.1 F 0.1 M 0.1 —
Tests below standard (%)
30.1 29.9 35.2 30.6 34.0 q
Tests not written (%)
2.4 0.4 0.0 3.1 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.9 6.6
6 6.4 5.9 q

St Lawrence [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 18.9
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $36,800: 0.2
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.7
Math
2.6
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
43.0
Tests not written (%)
1.5
Overall rating out of 10
5.3

Gr 6 enrollment: 53
Special needs (%): 13.2
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1723/2742 1499/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.6 2.4 2.8 2.6 —
2.7 2.7 2.9 2.7 —
2.5 2.5 2.8 2.8 —
2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 —
2.8 2.6 2.9 2.9 —
2.5 2.4 2.7 2.7 —
F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.3 F 0.4 q
E F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.3 —
37.6 43.5 27.1 33.6 —
1.7 8.1 4.6 3.0 —
5.8 4.9 6.6 5.5 —

St Malachy [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 43
ESL (%): 4.7
Special needs (%): 11.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $70,600: 1.0
Overall rank: 787/2742 1124/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 p
Writing
2.8 2.8 2.7 3.0 3.0 —
Math
2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.3 p
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 —
Writing
2.8 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 —
Math
2.6 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.8 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 M 0.5 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
41.1 36.3 37.5 20.4 21.5 p
Tests not written (%)
3.4 1.4 11.1 3.1 1.4 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.5 5.6 5.9 7.2 7.0 p

St Mark [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 32
ESL (%): 3.1
Special needs (%): 25.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $54,600: -0.7
Overall rank: 1991/2742 1312/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.7 3.1 2.7 2.4 —
Writing
2.7 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.5 —
Math
2.5 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.2 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 —
Writing
2.7 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 —
Math
2.3 2.4 2.3 2.7 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
39.6 27.9 29.3 26.1 34.5 —
Tests not written (%)
7.5 7.5 13.8 11.9 9.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.1 5.9 6.8 6.9 5.0 —

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy

St Martha [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 0.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,600: 1.8
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.9
Math
3.1
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.8
Math
2.8
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2
Math
M 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
25.0
Tests not written (%)
1.3
Overall rating out of 10
7.5

Gr 6 enrollment: 34
Special needs (%): 17.6
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 623/2742 363/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.8 2.6 3.0 3.0 —
2.9 3.0 2.8 2.8 —
3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 —
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 q
2.7 3.0 3.1 3.1 —
2.5 3.3 2.8 2.7 —
F 0.2 n/a M 0.1
E n/a
E n/a
E F 0.1 n/a
30.4 17.4 23.3 24.0 —
1.2 7.7 3.2 3.2 —
6.7 8.3 7.6 7.3 —

71

St Matthias [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 23
ESL (%): 17.4
Special needs (%): 4.3
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,700: 1.7
Overall rank: 667/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
3.2 3.2 n/a 3.3 2.9 n/a
Writing
3.2 2.9 n/a 3.1 2.9 n/a
Math
3.8 3.5 n/a 3.5 3.5 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 3.0 n/a 2.9 2.8 n/a
Writing
2.9 3.2 n/a 3.2 2.8 n/a
Math
2.6 3.2 n/a 3.0 2.6 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
19.5 10.5 n/a 8.5 24.2 n/a
Tests not written (%)
3.4 1.8 n/a 1.7 2.4 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
9 9.8 n/a 10 7.2 n/a

St Nicholas of Bari [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 62
ESL (%): 14.5
Special needs (%): 12.9
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,900: -1.6
Overall rank: 2367/2742 2270/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.7 2.2 1.7 2.1 2.1 —
Writing
2.3 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 —
Math
2.1 2.6 2.2 2.4 2.6 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.5 —
Writing
2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.7 —
Math
2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.5 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 F 0.3 F 0.4 F 0.3 M 0.3 —
Math
E F 0.1 F 0.1 M 0.1 M 0.2 q
Tests below standard (%)
67.4 53.2 62.6 61.0 48.6 —
Tests not written (%)
13.1 8.3 2.6 4.4 3.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
2.3 3.6 2.4 2.7 3.9 —

St Martin De Porres [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 50
ESL (%): 8.0
Special needs (%): 10.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $38,500: -2.5
Overall rank: 2583/2742 1938/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.2 q
Writing
2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 —
Math
2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.4 q
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.2 q
Writing
2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 —
Math
2.3 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.4 —
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 F 0.7 F 0.3 F 0.3 F 0.6 —
Math
M 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.4
E F 0.2 —
Tests below standard (%)
44.2 38.6 39.7 41.2 52.2 —
Tests not written (%)
2.3 7.9 3.3 0.0 1.2 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.1
5 4.9
5 2.9 —

St Maurice [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 17.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $42,000: -1.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.9
Math
2.9
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
3.1
Math
3.1
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
E
Tests below standard (%)
17.8
Tests not written (%)
6.3
Overall rating out of 10
8.5

St Norbert [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 3.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $49,900: -0.5
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.8
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
Math
E
Tests below standard (%)
37.1
Tests not written (%)
0.0
Overall rating out of 10
6.1

St Mary [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 30
ESL (%): 10.0
Special needs (%): 20.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $34,400: -0.8
Overall rank: 2183/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 40.5 n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.7 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.5 n/a

St Michael’s Choir [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 32
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 0.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $96,000: 3.5
Overall rank: 1/2742
10/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.2 —
Writing
3.0 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.1 —
Math
3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.2 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.4 —
Writing
3.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 —
Math
3.1 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.3 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
10.9 5.1 6.0 5.6 2.4 —
Tests not written (%)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 q
Overall rating out of 10
9.5 10 10 9.7 10.0 —

St Paschal Baylon [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 64
ESL (%): 26.6
Special needs (%): 17.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $44,900: 1.4
Overall rank: 843/2742 1383/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.8 2.2 2.5 2.7 —
Writing
2.9 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.9 —
Math
2.7 2.9 2.4 2.5 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.0 —
Writing
2.4 2.8 2.5 2.9 3.0 —
Math
2.3 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.9 —
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
E F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.6 —
Math
M 0.3 F 0.2 M 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.3 —
Tests below standard (%)
41.8 24.4 48.3 31.1 20.7 —
Tests not written (%)
2.7 5.3 1.0 2.3 1.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.2 6.9 4.4 5.8 6.9 —

St Mary of the Angels [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 37
ESL (%): 13.5
Special needs (%): 16.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $48,100: 0.1
Overall rank: 1655/2742 2083/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.8 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.7 p
Writing
2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.7 —
Math
2.3 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.8 p
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.1 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.6 p
Writing
2.3 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.8 p
Math
2.2 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.6 p
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 F 0.4 F 0.2 M 0.2 F 0.1 —
Math
E F 0.1 M 0.1 M 0.4 M 0.3 q
Tests below standard (%)
68.0 53.1 46.6 53.2 34.4 p
Tests not written (%)
2.6 4.0 1.1 2.7 3.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
2.8 3.6 4.8 3.5 5.6 —

St Monica [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 22
ESL (%): 22.7
Special needs (%): 13.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $103,200: 0.9
Overall rank: 511/2742 325/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.8 2.9 2.7 3.0 —
Writing
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 p
Math
3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 3.3 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 q
Writing
3.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 q
Math
3.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
16.2 26.2 27.2 21.6 20.7 —
Tests not written (%)
2.5 0.7 7.5 3.8 3.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
8.8 7.1 7.3 7.3 7.5 —

St Philip Neri [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 8.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $27,900: -0.9
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.0
Writing
2.6
Math
2.3
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.1
Writing
2.2
Math
2.0
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5
Math
F 0.3
Tests below standard (%)
59.8
Tests not written (%)
6.2
Overall rating out of 10
2.5

St Matthew [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 5.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $48,700: -0.6
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.5
Writing
2.0
Math
1.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.1
Writing
2.4
Math
2.3
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
69.0
Tests not written (%)
5.8
Overall rating out of 10
1.9

St Nicholas [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 13.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $42,600: 0.9
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.6
Math
2.8
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
37.2
Tests not written (%)
7.7
Overall rating out of 10
5.8

St Pius X [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 43
ESL (%): 2.3
Special needs (%): 14.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $161,900: 1.2
Overall rank: 86/2742 34/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
3.2 3.2 3.5 2.8 3.2 —
Writing
3.2 3.3 3.4 2.9 3.1 —
Math
3.3 3.5 3.4 2.9 3.5 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.0 3.2 2.9 2.9 3.3 —
Writing
3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 —
Math
3.0 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.1 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a F 0.6 M 0.1 F 0.5 F 0.4 n/a
Math
n/a
E M 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.1 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
12.3 9.5 12.0 21.0 9.2 —
Tests not written (%)
12.2 3.7 1.6 6.3 8.4 —
Overall rating out of 10
9.7 9.5 9.8 6.9 9.0 —

Gr 6 enrollment: 59
Special needs (%): 40.7
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1991/2742 2239/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
1.9 1.6 2.3 2.5 p
2.3 2.2 2.6 2.8 p
2.1 1.9 2.0 2.5 —
2.3 2.3 2.7 2.5 —
2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 —
2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 —
F 0.1 F 0.3
E
E —
M 0.4 F 0.1
E F 0.1 p
63.1 60.7 51.0 45.2 p
9.8 11.8 0.0 6.5 —
2.2 2.7 4.4 5.0 p

Gr 6 enrollment: 35
Special needs (%): 17.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2342/2742 688/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
3.1 2.7 2.6 2.4 q
3.1 2.8 2.8 2.8 q
3.3 3.2 2.9 2.4 —
2.9 3.0 2.8 2.4 —
2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 q
2.6 3.4 2.7 2.3 —
F 0.2 n/a F 0.2 n/a n/a
F 0.5 n/a
E n/a n/a
26.1 20.6 28.2 46.0 q
19.1 3.1 0.0 2.0 —
7.1 8.2 6.6 4.0 q

Gr 6 enrollment: 44
Special needs (%): 11.4
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1215/2742 1677/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.6 2.4 1.7 2.6 —
2.7 2.7 2.3 2.7 —
2.4 2.4 2.1 2.7 —
2.7 2.4 2.5 2.8 —
2.8 2.7 2.9 3.0 p
2.9 2.5 2.8 3.1 —
F 0.4 F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.2 n/a
F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.4 n/a
35.5 44.3 48.4 28.8 —
12.6 7.3 1.4 0.0 p
5.4 4.9 3.7 6.3 —

Gr 6 enrollment: 26
Special needs (%): 15.4
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1948/2742 1499/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.4 2.7 2.7 2.3 —
2.7 2.9 2.8 2.6 —
2.7 2.7 2.8 2.7 —
2.4 2.5 2.9 2.7 —
2.5 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
2.4 2.8 2.7 2.9 p
F 0.1 M 0.2 n/a n/a n/a
M 0.3 M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a
46.9 31.6 27.3 38.5 —
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 q
4.3
6 6.7 5.1 —

Gr 6 enrollment: 37
Special needs (%): 8.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2284/2742 2083/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.3 2.5 2.8 2.4 —
2.6 2.8 2.9 2.7 —
2.6 2.3 2.9 2.7 —
2.5 2.5 2.2 2.4 —
2.7 2.6 2.5 2.7 —
2.4 2.4 2.0 2.5 —
F 0.6 n/a n/a F 0.5 n/a
F 0.2 n/a n/a F 0.3 n/a
44.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 —
2.8 2.5 9.4 5.1 —
4.4 4.7 4.5 4.2 —

72

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010

St Raphael [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 1.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $48,300: 0.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.5
Math
2.4
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2
Math
M 0.3
Tests below standard (%)
47.0
Tests not written (%)
2.9
Overall rating out of 10
4.5

Gr 6 enrollment: 63
Special needs (%): 15.9
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1655/2742 1898/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.1 2.5 2.4 2.5 —
2.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 p
2.6 2.6 2.6 2.9 p
2.5 2.4 2.5 2.6 —
2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 —
2.5 2.4 2.3 2.6 —
F 0.5 F 0.5 F 0.1 F 0.3 —
F 0.1 F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.3 —
47.3 45.0 44.9 34.8 —
3.7 3.2 4.6 4.6 q
4.3 4.4 4.9 5.6 p

St Roch [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 15.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $36,000: -1.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.8
Math
2.9
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.0
Writing
2.1
Math
2.0
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
51.4
Tests not written (%)
2.4
Overall rating out of 10
4.3

Gr 6 enrollment: 45
Special needs (%): 17.8
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2284/2742 1938/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.6 2.5 2.7 2.4 —
2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 —
2.6 3.0 2.9 2.8 —
2.3 2.4 2.8 2.4 —
2.4 2.5 2.9 2.5 —
2.2 2.4 2.8 2.2 —
F 0.5 F 0.6 F 0.2 F 0.1 —
F 0.3 F 0.4 F 0.2 F 0.2 —
47.9 41.7 32.7 48.1 —
1.6 3.2 5.8 2.7 —
3.8 4.5 6.3 4.2 —

St Sylvester [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 30
ESL (%): 6.7
Special needs (%): 16.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $39,800: 1.6
Overall rank: 787/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 3.0 n/a 3.2 2.4 n/a
Writing
2.7 3.3 n/a 3.1 2.7 n/a
Math
2.5 3.5 n/a 3.1 2.9 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 3.0 n/a 2.9 3.0 n/a
Writing
2.7 3.0 n/a 3.0 2.9 n/a
Math
2.6 3.3 n/a 2.7 3.1 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
37.5 3.9 n/a 19.5 24.7 n/a
Tests not written (%)
7.5 15.3 n/a 5.8 3.8 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
5.9 10 n/a 8.3 7.0 n/a

St Raymond [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 3.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.9
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.6
Math
2.4
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
34.7
Tests not written (%)
2.0
Overall rating out of 10
6

Gr 6 enrollment: 32
Special needs (%): 12.5
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1838/2742 1898/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.4 1.9 2.7 2.5 —
2.7 2.5 2.9 2.9 —
2.6 2.2 2.8 2.7 —
2.2 2.1 2.7 2.6 —
2.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 —
2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 —
F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a
M 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
55.9 54.8 28.6 34.0 —
8.5 0.0 3.9 14.5 —
3.6 2.3 6.3 5.3 —

St Rose of Lima [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 56
ESL (%): 19.6
Special needs (%): 8.9
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $43,600: 1.2
Overall rank: 964/2742 929/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.8 —
Writing
2.9 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 —
Math
2.8 3.4 2.7 2.7 3.1 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.7 2.9 2.5 2.6 —
Writing
2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 —
Math
2.5 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 n/a M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.3 n/a
Math
F 0.3 n/a M 0.1 M 0.2
E n/a
Tests below standard (%)
37.5 20.0 27.4 37.0 27.0 —
Tests not written (%)
9.0 2.8 10.9 7.7 6.5 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.7
8
7 5.3 6.7 —

St Teresa [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 17
ESL (%): 17.6
Special needs (%): 29.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $52,100: 2.6
Overall rank: 261/2742 738/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.8 2.4 2.9 2.9 —
Writing
2.3 2.6 2.9 2.7 3.1 p
Math
2.4 2.9 2.9 3.2 2.9 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.5 3.2 3.0 3.1 —
Writing
2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8 —
Math
2.7 2.7 3.2 3.2 2.8 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
49.2 36.5 23.0 18.7 15.9 p
Tests not written (%)
4.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.3 5.7 7.9 8.1 8.2 p

St Rene Goupil [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 16
ESL (%): 6.3
Special needs (%): 18.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $42,100: 3.4
Overall rank: 121/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 15.7 n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.3 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.8 n/a

St Sebastian [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 11.9
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $42,200: 1.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
3.0
Math
3.2
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.5
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
37.3
Tests not written (%)
10.6
Overall rating out of 10
6.1

Gr 6 enrollment: 42
Special needs (%): 21.4
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 714/2742 626/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.9 2.8 2.7 3.0 —
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 —
3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 —
2.5 3.0 2.9 2.4 —
2.6 3.2 2.9 2.8 —
2.6 3.1 3.2 2.6 —
F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.9 F 0.1 —
E
E F 0.9 M 0.1 —
33.5 18.6 22.1 27.1 —
4.9 4.1 0.0 1.7 p
6.8 8.6 6.2 7.1 —

St Theresa Shrine [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 30
ESL (%): 3.3
Special needs (%): 16.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $60,700: -0.7
Overall rank: 1948/2742 1970/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.6 —
Math
2.4 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.5 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.8 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.8 —
Math
2.6 2.7 2.2 2.6 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a n/a F 0.4 n/a n/a
Math
F 0.2 n/a n/a F 0.4 n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
44.5 33.3 53.1 48.7 39.1 —
Tests not written (%)
1.8 8.2 7.2 4.4 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
5 5.8 3.1 3.6 5.1 —

St Richard [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 7.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $49,500: 0.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
2.8
Math
3.1
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.8
Math
2.8
Gender gap (level): Reading
E
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
29.0
Tests not written (%)
5.4
Overall rating out of 10
7.1

Gr 6 enrollment: 43
Special needs (%): 16.3
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1431/2742 738/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 3.1 3.0 2.5 —
2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 —
2.9 3.2 3.0 2.9 —
2.5 2.9 2.5 2.6 —
2.7 2.9 2.8 2.7 —
2.3 2.7 2.7 2.6 —
E
E F 0.2
E —
M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.3 —
36.2 23.0 24.5 31.3 —
4.2 7.5 0.4 2.4 —
6
8 7.1 6.0 —

St Simon [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 0.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $52,300: 0.8
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.8
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.5
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
M 0.3
Tests below standard (%)
39.6
Tests not written (%)
0.4
Overall rating out of 10
5.4

Gr 6 enrollment: 37
Special needs (%): 8.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1156/2742 1312/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.8 2.2 2.8 2.6 —
2.9 2.7 2.9 2.7 —
2.8 2.5 2.8 2.8 —
2.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 p
2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 —
2.7 2.4 2.7 2.6 —
F 0.6 F 0.3 n/a F 0.1 n/a
F 0.3 M 0.1 n/a F 0.2 n/a
26.7 43.1 25.5 29.4 —
1.4 4.0 7.7 0.5 —
6.1
5 6.8 6.4 —

St Thomas Aquinas [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 81
ESL (%): 21.0
Special needs (%): 16.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $43,200: 0.2
Overall rank: 1655/2742 1642/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.7 —
Writing
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 —
Math
2.7 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.9 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 —
Writing
2.5 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.7 —
Math
2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.3 q
Math
M 0.1 F 0.2
E
E F 0.2 —
Tests below standard (%)
39.8 42.1 38.9 40.9 33.8 —
Tests not written (%)
3.9 5.2 7.1 4.8 5.2 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.5 4.8 5.6
5 5.6 —

St Robert [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 12.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $74,300: -1.3
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.9
Math
3.0
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
3.0
Math
3.1
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2
Math
M 0.4
Tests below standard (%)
20.9
Tests not written (%)
5.7
Overall rating out of 10
7.5

Gr 6 enrollment: 72
Special needs (%): 20.8
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2075/2742 738/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
3.0 3.1 3.0 2.6 —
2.9 3.1 2.9 2.8 —
3.0 3.3 2.8 2.7 —
2.7 2.5 2.6 2.4 q
2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 q
2.9 2.6 2.8 2.4 q
F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.5 —
M 0.1 F 0.1
E F 0.2 —
23.0 24.7 25.8 36.7 q
6.2 13.9 3.0 0.5 —
7.5 7.3
7 4.8 q

St Stephen [Catholic] Toronto
ESL (%): 19.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $42,200: -0.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.0
Writing
2.1
Math
2.0
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.6
Math
2.6
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6
Math
F 0.4
Tests below standard (%)
57.0
Tests not written (%)
5.6
Overall rating out of 10
2.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 51
Special needs (%): 33.3
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1991/2742 2190/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 p
2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 p
2.6 2.2 2.6 2.7 —
2.2 2.5 2.3 2.5 —
2.3 2.5 2.4 2.7 —
2.3 2.2 2.2 2.6 —
F 0.7 F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.1 p
F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.2 M 0.1 —
54.4 56.4 51.0 42.4 —
5.6 4.7 2.4 1.1 p
2.9 3.7 3.6 5.0 p

St Thomas More [Catholic] Toronto
Gr 6 enrollment: 31
ESL (%): 22.6
Special needs (%): 16.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $47,600: 0.8
Overall rank: 1215/2742 1719/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 p
Writing
2.4 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.9 —
Math
2.3 2.8 2.9 2.6 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.6 —
Writing
2.4 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.7 —
Math
2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
E M 0.2 F 0.7 F 0.5 n/a n/a
Math
M 0.3 M 0.1 F 0.3
E n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
54.8 38.2 38.8 40.4 26.5 p
Tests not written (%)
1.1 5.1 2.9 1.3 5.6 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.8 5.6 4.7 5.1 6.3 —

1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3.4 3.7 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 10 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 14.2 3. of $28.3 1.3 36.1 — 3. of $91.1 2.0 — 2.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.0 2.1 F 0.6 2.7 47.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — 3.9 3.8 2.3 — Tam O’Shanter [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 13.0 2.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 6. level: Reading 3.0 — 2.2 7.9 — Overall rating out of 10 9 8.1 50.2 E M 0.3 F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 Math M 0.4 3.1 — Writing 3.5 5.6 F 0.2 8.8 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 88/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 Math M 0.9 2.3 17.7 Writing 2.7 2.6 8.8 8.4 Writing 3.8 3.3 3.9 2.3 2.9 3.7 — 2.7 17.8 3.1 — E M 0.4 4.1 Gr 6 avg.6 22.5 Writing 2.8 2.0 — F 0.4 Gr 6 avg.7 Writing 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 2.4 F 0.8 2.0 — 2.6 28.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.6 Math 2.2 28.2 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 q Tests not written (%) 6.5 Tests not written (%) 7.1 3.2 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 4.6 8.7 0.7 2.1 M 0.2 q 3.2 — 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.6 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 — 3.9 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.8 — Writing 2.6 2.2 q 9.3 52.1 F 0.1 3.2 F 0.3 2.7 3.2 F 0.7 18.2 3.1 F 0.8 2.7 2.3 4.1 1.2 E E — 30.7 Overall rating out of 10 2.8 — Steelesview [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 18.2 2.6 2.4 7.0 2.9 3.5 2.2 4.1 — 38.1 E M 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.9 2. inc.1 Tests below standard (%) 38.2 F 0.1 — 1.0 Writing 2. inc.8 — Math 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.0 13. inc.1 2.2 M 0.9 2.3 M 0.6 2.5 — Terraview-Willowfield [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 0.1 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.9 2.8 Math 2.2 2.1 3.1 — 3.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.3 7.1 8.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.9 3.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 10.4 2.4 6.9 2.7 3.6 2.1 — Writing 2. of $48.6 2. of $292. level: Reading 3.4 F 0.5 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 0.3 2.7 24.1 — 23.8 2.3 — 8.8 2.8 Tests not written (%) 7.0 — 3.8 3.3 n/a 13.8 Gr 6 avg.3 3.8 Special needs (%): 5.5 2.9 p Gr 6 avg.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.0 3.0 — Math 2.3 0.7 9.2 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 9.0 2.9 — 2.3 F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 F 0.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 — 2.6 18.9 7.1 — 2.9 2.400: -0.0 2.4 21.7 3.6 2.5 p 2.4 5.8 2.900: -0.2 — 3.4 F 0.6 48.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2183/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Math 2.3 2.1 — M 0.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 1642/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — F 0.4 2.9 Tests not written (%) 3.2 2.4 2.0 3.8 2.9 — 2.7 — 2.9 Writing 3. of $47.3 3.9 3.1 5.0 2.3 — 3.9 3.1 — Writing 2.4 — 2.5 10. level: Reading 2.2 E M 0.6 Writing 2.9 3.6 2.2 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Tests not written (%) 1.5 — Sts Cosmas and Damian [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 29.8 2.0 2.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 97 Special needs (%): 23. of $44.8 Writing 3.0 — 9.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 7.5 — 3.4 38.9 2.3 3.1 3.1 3.8 3.9 2.4 — 2.5 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.9 2.9 5.8 2.4 2.6 2.1 Tests not written (%) 17.4 3.6 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 7.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.8 6.3 2.0 2.1 26.0 3.6 — M 0.3 2.4 30.8 12.9 2.2 2.7 Math 2.7 3.8 24. inc.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 — 2.4 35.7 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.0 2.2 13. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 — Writing 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.6 3.4 3.0 0.0 — Math 2.0 Overall rank: 511/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 p 2.4 F 0.0 15.8 13.1 M 0.1 — 21.4 2.2 n/a n/a M 0.7 Writing 2. of $55.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 21.4 — F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 3.0 7.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.0 — Math 2.0 2.0 Writing 3.3 14.1 3.9 7.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 3.9 2.4 40.6 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 59 Special needs (%): 13.1 Gr 6 avg.9 2.8 — 12.0 3.6 3.1 q 9. inc.9 2.4 2.5 Tests below standard (%) 17. of $81.1 n/a E M 0.9 — Math 2.7 7.4 F 0.6 2.6 q Writing 3. level: Reading 2.2 10.3 q 2.2 Math 3. inc.0 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 3.3 2.3 2.7 2.9 — 3.3 Writing 2.1 — Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Math 3.2 — F 0. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.4 — 9.9 Math 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3.8 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. level: Reading 3.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 — 2.2 2.8 — Math 2.1 2. level: Reading 2. of $44.2 3.3 5.9 3.7 2.8 9. level: Reading 2.8 2.5 St Ursula [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 3.4 3.7 73 Gr 6 enrollment: 80 Special needs (%): 15. inc.8 2.3 F 0.1 F 0.7 2.1 6.0 Tests not written (%) 9.1 Tests below standard (%) 64.5 32.2 8. level: Reading 2. of $68.1 Math 3.2 2.7 Writing 2.8 37.3 3.8 2.6 p 3.6 2.0 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 0. level: Reading 2.5 2. inc.7 2.9 3.3 F 0.1 2.5 2.7 3.7 2.700: 3.9 2.400: 3.4 2.8 2.1 3.7 Special needs (%): 18.6 8.3 F 0.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 81 Special needs (%): 11.1 7.9 2.9 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 58/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 6.9 30.7 2.7 2.9 2.7 — The Divine Infant [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 17 ESL (%): 11.3 21.9 2.6 — F 0.7 22.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Writing 2.1 n/a 10.3 Math 2.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $63.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.6 Math 2.1 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.2 3.6 2.5 — 2.1 27.8 2.1 n/a M 0.3 5.4 Gr 6 avg.6 2.0 Writing 2.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 15.8 — Math 3.7 3.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 25. level: Reading 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 51.2 3.400: -2.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 1.8 8.6 Math F 0.1 7 8.3 p 3.4 Special needs (%): 14.4 F 0.7 Math 3.4 Math 2.9 Special needs (%): 6.7 2.5 p Stella Maris [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 6.0 3.9 2.8 8.5 5.7 0.6 — 2.9 3.6 — F 0.8 3.4 2.500: 0.8 2.4 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 F 0.4 — E n/a F 0.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.1 — 6.7 19.7 2.3 Gr 6 avg. inc.3 M 0.0 Special needs (%): 22.8 2.3 2.500: 1.1 — 3.1 2.5 — 2.2 F 0.1 n/a M 0.9 8.8 24.0 2.0 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.7 — 2.2 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 26.9 2.3 4.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.7 2.5 7.0 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2530/2742 2204/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.0 — 2.3 8.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 q St Victor [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 6.8 2.7 — Terry Fox [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 18.1 3.4 — F 0.600: 1. inc.0 — 6.6 F 0.3 6.0 — Writing 2.2 8 6. level: Reading 2.0 3.6 3.8 Tests not written (%) 7.1 3.1 Overall rank: 121/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — 3.9 Overall rank: 438/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.7 2.2 F 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2. inc.0 3. of $51.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 — 6.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 Tests not written (%) 4.2 — 2.3 — F 0.4 2.9 3.2 3.8 2.5 2.4 2.8 9.1 3.8 2.4 — n/a n/a E E n/a F 0. level: Reading 3.700: 1.0 58. inc.7 23.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.8 2.5 5.9 2.0 58.0 2.5 56.4 2.4 7.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.0 Writing 2.5 2.9 3.0 7.5 — Writing 2.9 — 2.6 2.9 3.000: 2.3 2.6 0.7 2.5 F 0.2 14.0 3.6 — 2.6 2.2 Writing 2.1 2.4 E — 10.3 F 0.0 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 17.3 1.0 2.1 — M 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 4.6 2.0 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 3.3 14.1 23.2 Gr 6 avg.1 n/a n/a Math M 0.0 — 3.400: -1.4 5.0 — 5.1 9.4 Writing 2.7 2.1 2.3 Overall rank: 147/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.000: 3.9 Math 3.5 F 0.1 Math 3.9 3.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.2 — 3.0 3.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a F 0.5 — 1.2 5.7 3.3 2.9 Swansea [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.8 13.4 2.7 2. inc.6 2.8 Overall rank: 573/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 8.1 — 56.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 11.8 2.2 q 9.3 32.7 21. inc.8 n/a St Wilfrid [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 5.7 — Summit Heights [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 2.2 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 6.7 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.1 3.5 4.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25. level: Reading 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — Writing 2. of $38.9 6.100: 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 — Gr 6 avg.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy St Timothy [Catholic] Toronto ESL (%): 36.9 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.2 2. level: Reading 2.4 1.0 2.6 Math 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — 3.7 3. level: Reading 3.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.8 2.7 4.9 2.7 — 2.0 2.1 6.1 9.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 33/2742 28/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.4 2.6 2.1 9.6 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3. level: Reading 2.3 — Gr 6 enrollment: 86 Special needs (%): 5.4 8.5 2.7 — 2.4 St Vincent de Paul [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.0 1.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.0 3.9 2.4 1.8 q Gr 6 avg.8 2.2 — The Elms [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 5.1 Tests below standard (%) 33.0 3.2 — F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 8. of $38. of $107. inc.9 — Math 2.8 3.4 Math F 0.5 — 7.900: 2.3 — 53.7 Writing 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 — F 0.0 2.3 8.3 2.8 8.8 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.9 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 17.1 2.8 Math 3.5 26.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 — 3.1 — 1.3 — .9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 F 0.6 2.8 — 3.500: -0.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.

4 5.0 2.9 33. level: Reading 2.8 2.6 2.7 3.2 3. level: Reading 2.8 7.8 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 23.6 Math 2.1 F 0.8 2.8 2.4 Overall rank: 1991/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 7.9 2.3 F 0.2 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.0 2.6 2.3 2.7 2. inc.000: 1.5 F 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 27.0 Special needs (%): 16.8 n/a 2.2 Math M 0.6 — 2.3 2.9 7.4 2.6 2.5 6.1 35.6 Writing 2.2 F 0.3 q Writing 3.8 — 2.900: -1.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.2 3.0 2.3 2.2 4.9 3.9 — Walter Perry [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.7 n/a Math 3.4 20.7 — 2.8 2.9 3.6 2.5 24.8 2.6 3.1 20.3 2.4 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.6 — 2. inc.0 p Overall rating out of 10 5.1 Overall rating out of 10 4.7 2.8 Tests not written (%) 7.5 34.1 52.7 2.2 3.7 2.0 3.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 50.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.8 3.9 — 0.1 3. of $34.8 3.3 M 0.4 — 2.7 n/a 2.0 4.3 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 12.6 Math 2. of $41.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 43.2 n/a E F 0.4 Math 2.2 3.7 2.1 36.7 2.1 3.7 17.4 — Venerable John Merlini [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0. of $60.1 F 0.9 — Writing 3.4 Writing 2.6 — Writing 2.4 Writing 2.7 — 2.0 — 3.9 — 3.3 — F 0.7 2.5 q Warren Park [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.2 3.1 F 0.6 2.2 — M 0.9 3.6 — 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 21.2 2.5 19.9 2.4 2.2 M 0.3 2.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.6 1.7 3.6 Gr 6 avg.4 Tests not written (%) 1.4 3.6 Math 2.0 49.1 3.1 2.2 2. inc.2 M 0.6 n/a Tests below standard (%) 23. of $63.6 2.3 2.1 Overall rank: 360/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3.4 n/a n/a M 0.5 3.1 n/a F 0.0 — Writing 1.7 27.3 2.9 3.0 7.0 2.2 3.3 F 0.6 2.1 p 10.7 — Writing 2.2 n/a Writing 2.0 2.2 n/a 5.3 F 0.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 74 Special needs (%): 12.5 n/a 2.0 25.5 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 7.2 7.4 — Tests not written (%) 9.0 Gr 6 avg.3 2. of $39.7 5.1 3.6 2.7 Math 2.0 0.4 3.1 M 0.9 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 41.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — M 0.6 p 2.8 — 3.6 2. of $156.5 — 2.6 Special needs (%): 25. level: Reading 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 2127/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.9 — Tom Longboat [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 1.6 19.2 7.7 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.2 4.3 Writing 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — 2.9 3.0 11.8 2.8 7.6 Overall rating out of 10 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 32.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 — 0.2 F 0.2 2.7 Overall rank: 1087/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.2 E E — 49.1 2.6 2.5 2.3 5. level: Reading 2.9 3.0 — 4.3 6.9 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — Overall rating out of 10 9.5 5.5 2.9 2.5 6.6 — Tests below standard (%) 40.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 — Math 2.1 3.3 — F 0.1 Tests not written (%) 4.6 Writing 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.9 2.2 M 0.8 Gr 6 avg.6 — 2. of $40.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 10 8. inc.9 51.8 7. level: Reading 2.3 Tests not written (%) 7.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.5 2.1 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0. inc.8 2.1 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 7.5 2.4 Overall rank: 843/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.3 56.9 3.1 3.8 2.9 n/a 2.3 F 0.7 2.8 14.1 — 3.0 2.9 — Math 2.9 2.5 Gr 6 avg.5 n/a Math M 0.0 2.4 Overall rank: 121/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 F 0.6 Writing 2.500: 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.2 48.0 24.4 Tests below standard (%) 29.3 3.4 n/a F 0.6 Writing 2.8 Math 2.2 F 0.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 24.7 3.8 2.8 5.2 — Gr 6 avg.9 8.8 2.2 M 0.0 2.9 n/a 1.3 2.6 2.2 — 38.4 2.400: 1.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 20.6 q Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 — F 0.9 3.9 Special needs (%): 3.8 Math 2.6 2.2 F 0.0 — 3.1 F 0.6 — 6.400: 1.8 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 58.5 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.8 2.7 2. of $63.4 23.5 6.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 n/a 2.9 — 3.4 F 0.5 2.6 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 20.1 3.6 3.4 n/a 2.9 3.9 3.3 M 0.4 — 7.9 2.1 F 0.2 — E M 0.2 F 0.000: -0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1557/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.3 F 0.7 2.3 2.9 2.3 F 0.9 3.2 20. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.2 2.6 2.9 3.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 9.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.5 — 2.3 — 4.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 — 8.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 6.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 Math 2.8 n/a Math 2.0 3.6 7 7.9 2.0 26.0 3. inc.8 n/a Writing 1.9 — Math 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — West Preparatory [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 54 ESL (%): 5.1 3.4 27.2 Gr 6 avg.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 11.1 3.6 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 43.4 — 2.7 Writing 2.7 2.9 Math 3.1 — Writing 2.9 3.3 7.0 3.3 2.4 7.3 16.0 3.6 13.4 Writing 2.0 4.0 2.7 31.9 2.7 2.9 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 2.0 2.1 18.4 3.5 2.6 36.0 2.3 2.8 2.5 q 2.9 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.4 E E — 11.1 2.9 17.9 2.2 F 0.5 2.2 Writing 2.3 q F 0.6 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.9 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2 2.9 2.2 F 0.5 2.5 q Math 3.6 2.4 q 5.0 2.2 5.0 — West Hill [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 0.4 2.8 2.8 7.4 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 — 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 44.2 2.2 — 2.9 q Tests not written (%) 12.0 — Math 2.8 2.0 — 8.8 n/a 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — Math 2.1 3.5 — 5.0 — Writing 2. inc.2 5.3 3.4 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.1 F 0.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 4.5 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 2.8 2.6 2.6 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.4 1.8 2.9 3.8 2.7 2.9 Gr 6 avg.6 3.1 34. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Gr 6 enrollment: 70 Special needs (%): 15. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 — E n/a n/a E n/a M 0.0 — 3.8 8.5 2.5 Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.0 2.1 3.1 F 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.1 F 0.0 6.6 4.5 21.0 Special needs (%): 4. inc.0 — Tests not written (%) 6.2 3.5 3.4 Math M 0.5 19.1 Overall rank: 1431/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.7 51.9 2.7 Warden Avenue [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 6.5 n/a 2. level: Reading 2.4 3.8 2.9 — 3.8 19.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 2.8 3.9 n/a 4.7 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.7 2.9 — 3.8 2.2 M 0.2 Math F 0.0 47.8 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) 7.2 2.7 — 2.2 7.9 — West Humber [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 2.0 3.0 2.8 — .7 2.8 2.5 — 3.4 0.9 2.7 6.6 n/a 2.6 — F 0.3 2.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 11.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.6 2.7 2.6 2.4 — Transfiguration of our Lord [Catholic] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 3.0 2.8 — Math 2.2 n/a 36.9 2.2 M 0.5 Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 1.0 2.8 — 2.6 n/a 2.300: -1.8 1.0 2.5 2.6 6.4 2.3 18.1 F 0.900: 0.5 — 53. level: Reading 2.3 38.1 36.2 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 — Math 3.600: -0.5 2.8 — 3.400: 0.2 12.800: 0.1 7.0 3.5 Math 2. level: Reading 3.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.1 E — M 0.8 Math 3.0 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.7 — 2.0 2.2 F 0.0 n/a 40.1 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 11.1 2.0 n/a Wexford [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 9.2 3.6 F 0.3 F 0.7 2.2 — F 0.1 — Math E M 0.900: -0.7 — 2.5 Math 2.4 5.0 0.4 3.9 3.3 M 0.3 1.8 7.6 q 3.2 q 27.7 — Writing 2.4 F 0.2 Tests below standard (%) 55.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.7 — 2.1 F 0.4 27.6 n/a 2.7 1.6 F 0.1 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3. of $19.1 Gr 6 avg.5 2.5 9.2 Writing 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 0.6 29.4 2.7 3.8 — 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 — F 0.9 2. inc.0 2.8 2.0 3.4 4.1 F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 6.2 24.4 Math 2.0 2.2 Math 2.5 2. of $40.8 23. of $77.4 Math 2.1 Writing 2. of $47.8 2.4 0.4 3.2 n/a F 0.7 — 2. of $60.0 2.6 2.7 Math 2.1 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 42.8 Writing 2.9 6.3 n/a 2.7 — 3.8 — White Haven [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 3.5 8.0 3.3 2.9 — F 0.7 2.9 2.5 2. inc.6 Writing 2.4 M 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.3 Tests not written (%) 7. of $41.3 — Math M 0.2 E M 0.3 2.7 2.4 — 31.6 — 16.4 3.2 M 0.1 3.4 16.9 2.7 2.5 6.200: -0.2 — F 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.74 Thomas L Wells [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.4 — 2.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.100: 3.6 2.4 13. level: Reading 2.5 2.9 3.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 46. inc.2 2.1 Tests not written (%) 6.4 E F 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — Writing 2.1 n/a 36.1 2.9 2.7 — 3.8 — 15.1 E — M 0.8 2.1 M 0.4 5.8 2.7 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 — 7.0 7.4 — West Rouge [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.4 7.3 — Overall rating out of 10 2.2 F 0.0 2.6 2.600: 2.6 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.8 3.1 — Math 3.4 5.3 2.1 34.2 E E F 0.9 2.8 2.2 19.8 3.8 3.6 2.0 3.1 F 0.1 Math M 0.2 — 6. level: Reading 2.9 — Math 2.0 19.2 Tests below standard (%) 42.6 3.3 3.8 3.6 — 2.7 2.3 44.3 10.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 56.0 2.4 0.2 F 0. inc.5 2.1 6. inc. of $61.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 2153/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.2 Timberbank [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 15.6 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1948/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Writing 2.6 7.0 — Writing 2.1 p Gr 6 avg.7 6.3 2.3 2.6 2.5 — 2.5 2.2 2.3 6 8.4 2.8 n/a Vradenburg [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.

1 3.8 2.0 — .7 Special needs (%): 16.9 0.9 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 5.0 21.1 Writing 3.4 Tests not written (%) 3.5 Overall rank: 295/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.8 2.8 2.6 Overall rank: 623/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — Math 2.0 3.8 2.8 3.9 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 M 0.0 2.0 Math 3.1 Writing 3.3 — 2.900: 1. level: Reading 3.3 1.1 — 5.1 M 0.2 — 24.9 — Math 3.100: 1.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 q Math 3.0 3.9 — Math 3.1 3.4 2.8 3.1 2.9 2.0 2.8 2.1 M 0.8 2.1 — 2.5 5.3 1.0 2.9 2. level: Reading 3.9 2.1 M 0.9 — Overall rating out of 10 7 7.1 3.9 Math 2.4 2.0 2.3 — 14.5 2.400: -4.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 6 5.6 14.0 2.6 2.2 6.3 — Math F 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 3.9 3.8 2.1 2.0 3.0 3.9 3.6 2.9 2.8 2.0 Writing 3.200: 0.9 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 58/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 Math 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.3 n/a Armadale [Public] Markham ESL (%): 32. of $452.7 — Math 2.9 Overall rank: 1886/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.4 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 50 Special needs (%): 8.9 — 3.3 n/a F 0.9 3. inc.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 23.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 p 2.4 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.2 — M 0.7 34.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 — 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.9 Tests not written (%) 12.9 3.3 F 0.0 3.1 p Math F 0.4 — Académie de la Moraine [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 4.3 6.2 F 0.0 3.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 6.1 8.9 3.9 2.3 Math M 0.2 3.5 n/a F 0.9 1.2 p Math F 0.9 3.9 2.6 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — Gr 6 avg. of $85.6 2.0 2.6 — 6.1 p 2.1 E F 0.1 M 0.4 2.1 Math M 0.7 2.3 7.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 0.5 3.8 3.2 M 0.3 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a E F 0.4 F 0.0 3.9 p F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Tests not written (%) 3.5 — 2. of $29.8 3. of $89.4 45. level: Reading 2.7 Writing 2.1 3.6 2.4 Special needs (%): 18. level: Reading 2.0 Tests not written (%) 11.6 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 2.7 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — Tests not written (%) 2.9 3.1 M 0.2 — YORK AREA Alexander Muir [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 41.5 Writing 2.7 2.4 Gr 6 avg.5 20.0 3.2 2.3 Math F 0.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.2 — Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 11.8 — 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.6 — 19.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 11.6 — 5.100: 1. inc.1 3.7 E F 0.6 — 2.3 — 13.4 2.3 2.8 — 2.800: 2. inc.1 7.3 25.0 34.3 2.0 2.8 2.0 — 3.7 2.5 F 0.1 F 0.8 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 27.7 3. level: Reading 3.7 Math 2.9 2.3 8.8 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2. inc.0 Overall rating out of 10 9.100: 2.7 2.0 3.1 5. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.1 Math F 0.6 — Writing 2.8 3. level: Reading 2.3 q 6.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.5 2.1 3.5 Writing 2.4 E — Tests below standard (%) 22.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — 4.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 Writing 3.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.3 8. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 E F 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $153.0 3.3 5.0 — 7.0 3.9 2.6 7.1 22.2 2.7 — Writing 2.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 11.7 2.2 F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 15.9 3.0 — 7.5 33.1 — 26.0 2.8 2.3 Math F 0.5 Special needs (%): 4.1 M 0. inc.8 43.9 2.9 7.0 3.8 2.7 2.1 8.4 Ashton Meadows [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 42.9 — 1.7 — F 0.8 2.1 F 0.7 7.4 F 0.0 1.1 — Tests below standard (%) 19.7 — Math 2.9 Gr 6 avg.2 E M 0.9 6.0 2.8 2.9 2.2 Writing 3. of $50.8 — Math 2.1 2.9 3.2 Math 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.6 2.6 — 2.9 — 2.9 14.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 0.8 2.1 1.2 29.8 3.9 2.8 — 2.7 Math 2.1 3.8 0.1 — 37.1 — 7.8 11.8 2.6 2.7 7.2 Gr 6 avg.7 — Tests not written (%) 4. inc.9 3.9 33.7 2.0 5.4 Tests below standard (%) 29. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 E E — M 0.2 3.2 — 3.9 3.9 2.3 8.3 1. inc.1 7.6 — F 0.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 M 0.0 2.7 3.9 2.8 — 3.6 Math 2.1 Math 3.0 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.2 q 2.2 F 0.8 40.1 3.0 0.8 3.8 p Math 2.7 17.1 2.0 3.5 2.0 1. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 6.9 9.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.1 M 0. inc.6 2.3 q 2.6 20.8 2.3 F 0. inc.6 Math 2.3 M 0. inc.4 3.4 — 2.8 2.1 E F 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Wilkinson [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 2.4 2.5 2.1 F 0.6 2.4 7 9.9 3.8 2.5 3.8 2.2 F 0.2 29.0 — Writing 2.7 2.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 8.8 n/a Armitage Village [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 23.1 F 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 21. level: Reading 2.2 p 38.1 F 0.400: 0.3 F 0.6 2.1 F 0.5 37.7 2.0 2.7 2.9 — E F 0.8 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.0 2.3 F 0.1 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.000: -0.3 F 0.8 — 2.5 7 7.9 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 78/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.8 — William G Davis [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 — Williamson Road [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 73 ESL (%): 0.1 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 28.400: -0.3 Tests below standard (%) 11.8 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 p Overall rating out of 10 7.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.8 3.9 27.3 n/a n/a Math M 0.8 — 11.5 Overall rank: 1556/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 17.3 — 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 21.7 n/a William Tredway [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 54 ESL (%): 3. level: Reading 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 M 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 30.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 — 3.2 n/a M 0.7 Special needs (%): 13.2 F 0.2 F 0.6 23.1 3.2 F 0.1 3.9 3.2 58. inc.2 F 0.9 — F 0.0 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 40.0 Gr 6 avg.1 p Writing 2.6 24.9 2.5 2.8 12.3 11. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 964/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 1.1 3.100: 0.2 Math 3.7 0.8 2.7 — Woburn [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 21.6 2.8 3.2 F 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 40.8 3.7 2.9 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.8 Math 2.5 20.6 Writing 2.7 2. of $48. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.5 2.6 Special needs (%): 27. of $89.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 M 0.0 2.1 — Willow Park [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.1 E E M 0.5 2.8 2.6 2.9 3.5 q 75 Whitney [Public] Toronto ESL (%): 0.9 2.2 — Math M 0.3 p 16.6 Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 Math 3.8 2.1 p 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2478/2742 1970/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — Math 3. inc. level: Reading 3.8 2.9 3.7 2. of $29.1 3.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 — Writing 2.1 E F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.9 7.9 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 6.5 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 7.6 2.1 p Withrow Avenue [Public] Toronto Gr 6 enrollment: 71 ESL (%): 0.7 3. level: Reading 2.6 7.6 2.5 F 0.8 2.7 Special needs (%): 16.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 6.0 10.4 Math F 0.1 3.7 2.4 q 2.2 — 3.5 F 0.0 3.000: 0.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.4 19.6 2.6 — Writing 2.3 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 7.1 37.3 F 0.0 — 3.4 — F 0.0 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — 3.7 2.7 2.2 F 0.5 F 0.9 3.500: -0.8 — 3.1 2. level: Reading 3.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.3 4.9 Tests not written (%) 6.4 5.2 3.9 2.9 25.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.1 3.7 2.2 24.0 2.0 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 2.0 21.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.0 0.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 21.9 2.8 — 3.6 2.0 q F 0.0 3.0 3.2 8. of $109. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 11.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 23.1 M 0.1 F 0.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.9 2.1 2.2 18.9 3.9 2.6 2.2 — Aldergrove [Public] Unionville ESL (%): 43.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 M 0.8 2.1 — 3.7 2.1 F 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 7.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 9.3 3. inc.1 3.1 3.1 7.3 1.1 E F 0.1 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.3 — Tests below standard (%) 52.2 F 0.7 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 5.9 8 8.9 2.1 8.9 20.6 2.1 n/a 18.6 3.0 2.3 23.5 9.9 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.0 Math 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 25. level: Reading 2.8 3. inc.8 Writing 2.3 3.2 F 0.6 q F 0.2 4.9 8.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 108 Special needs (%): 6.4 p 2.3 2.4 4.0 — Math 3.8 2.9 — Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 9.7 7.3 — F 0.3 3.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 27.5 — Writing 2.8 2.8 48.6 2.8 2.3 F 0.9 — 8.0 3.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 0.100: -1.8 3. of $35.2 3.5 1.7 — Writing 2.7 2.1 q M 0.6 Math 2.0 — 3.1 Gr 6 avg.3 — All Saints [Catholic] Unionville ESL (%): 0.6 Writing 2.1 Writing 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 15.8 2.5 2.1 5.2 8.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $102. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.2 — E M 0.4 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.2 E F 0.5 2.1 p 2.2 4.0 Special needs (%): 28.9 Writing 2.1 F 0.5 M 0.6 Overall rank: 261/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.7 41.3 Math F 0.1 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 16. of $60.3 — Writing 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 22.1 Overall rank: 1215/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $74.7 — 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.2 2.8 — 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 15.5 22.3 5.0 2.2 2.9 2.

1 10.3 11.3 — Bayview Glen [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 36.1 F 0.0 n/a 3. level: Reading 3.9 2.9 2.2 F 0.1 M 0.0 3.8 — 2.1 3.9 Math 2.0 3.1 2.7 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3.0 2.8 6.5 32.9 3.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 5.0 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 29.3 E F 0. inc.0 4.2 3.9 3.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 0.0 Writing 3.2 — Writing 3.3 Tests not written (%) 5.8 2.0 2.9 2.9 q 2.8 6.7 2.2 8.5 2.2 3. level: Reading 3.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 23.9 Gr 6 avg.8 n/a 2.1 30.1 7.0 2.2 p Math 3.0 — 7.7 12.1 n/a n/a Math M 0.5 2.2 3.2 3.9 3.8 22.6 n/a 2.1 3.1 — 2.0 3.6 2.2 — 7.0 0.3 4.3 3.0 3.1 19.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 6.6 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 n/a F 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 Overall rank: 53/2742 46/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.1 3.2 — Math 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.700: 0.5 — M 0.2 — 41.5 3.0 3.4 Math 2.7 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 — Tests not written (%) 16.5 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 — Writing 3. level: Reading 3.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 7.7 Tests not written (%) 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 8.4 2.6 0.0 — Math 3.0 3.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 p Writing 2.1 Gr 6 avg.1 — 2.9 3.800: -0.2 F 0.2 n/a 2.7 Math 2.2 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.9 2. inc.2 22.7 8.6 2.1 — 8.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 Math 3.0 19.6 17.6 2.1 3.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.0 q Gr 6 avg.6 — 2. level: Reading n/a 2.7 7.8 — F 0.1 3.6 — 2.2 3.0 1.3 E F 0.8 4.0 3.8 2.1 3.3 3.2 8.900: 1.3 Tests not written (%) 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Gr 6 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 8.2 — 23.7 8.5 7.1 8.2 6.1 3.1 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.0 3.7 3.1 — 17.9 2.2 F 0.3 — M 0.3 M 0.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 — 3.7 2.7 2.2 M 0.0 3.8 2.0 3.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 14.2 Math F 0.9 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — Bayview Hill [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 109 ESL (%): 17.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 34.2 F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.7 2.5 Writing 2.2 2.5 2.0 2.8 3.2 2.5 2.8 Writing 2.0 2.2 6.8 2.2 — 7.6 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 3.4 17.7 n/a Math n/a 2.2 — Writing 3.8 3.5 n/a 2.2 3.5 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 — 4.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.4 p F 0.8 2.7 — 4.3 Writing 2.2 27.5 0.7 8.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 18.1 Overall rank: 166/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.0 2.4 7.1 Tests not written (%) 6.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 Gr 6 avg.4 1.2 8. inc.7 — 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 8.0 2.4 E E F 0. of $125. of $144.5 Writing 2.3 — 7.1 F 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.5 2.9 — 3.9 9.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 2.2 — M 0.7 35.0 2.8 — 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 31.8 2.9 7.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 89 Special needs (%): 11.1 3.1 9. of $235.6 Math 2.0 3.0 Gr 6 avg.9 2.6 12.6 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — 2.2 3.9 Special needs (%): 5.5 2.4 — Aurora Grove [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 13.2 3.3 3.7 21.8 2.1 3.2 6.5 2.2 p 3.6 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.1 2.9 2.0 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 0.8 — 3.6 Overall rank: 1/2742 1/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 3.0 3.8 Overall rank: 147/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 2.0 2.8 Writing 2.7 11.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — Writing 2. inc.7 2.5 0.0 p 2.5 F 0.7 19.1 Math 3.1 3.9 2.9 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 10 10 10.0 3.5 — Bakersfield [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 28.6 2.9 3.0 3.9 — F 0.2 3.9 2.4 — 4.1 2. level: Reading 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.6 4. inc. level: Reading 2.2 12.0 — 2.7 8 8.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.1 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.5 n/a Baythorn [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 23.3 23.6 p 3.0 — 2.3 47.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.6 Math 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 0. inc.7 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 M 0.2 F 0.9 — 7.9 Math 2. of $81.8 — 3.9 3.5 23.2 F 0.8 2.9 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 18.8 17.2 8.2 3.7 — 2.0 — Blue Willow [Public] Woodbridge ESL (%): 29.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 20.9 Gr 6 avg.8 — 2.9 27.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 Gr 6 avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 46.5 23.8 2.1 3. of $105.1 n/a 28.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 Writing 2.5 2.8 Math 2.3 F 0.1 — 2.0 3. of $115.9 3.9 13.2 3.7 Writing 2.3 — F 0.0 1.0 3.5 8.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 101 Special needs (%): 13. inc.1 3.8 4.8 5.6 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.3 3. level: Reading 2.1 5.3 M 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 16.7 n/a Math n/a 3. level: Reading 2.4 Writing 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.6 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 — F 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 3.3 — Tests not written (%) 3.9 — 3.9 Tests not written (%) 5.6 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 14.9 3.8 2.6 — Writing 3.9 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.700: 0. inc.7 2.3 M 0.2 Math M 0.1 Math 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.100: -0.9 — Math 3.3 — 2.1 3.5 6.9 Gr 6 avg.0 0.1 M 0.0 3.9 Writing 2.400: 1.1 E F 0.8 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 40.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 p Tests not written (%) 6.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 24.5 7.7 Math 2.6 Writing 2.8 Math 2.3 F 0.4 35.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 3.3 — E M 0.5 — F 0.1 Gr 6 avg. inc. of $95.2 13.8 3.5 6.8 6.4 Special needs (%): 13.6 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 17.0 Special needs (%): 4.2 — F 0.3 41.0 0.1 14.8 — 2.1 — M 0.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.500: -1.9 2.5 2.7 3.6 2.8 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 2.0 3.0 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 21.2 E — 30.2 p 3.1 Tests not written (%) 4.5 2.5 E F 0.1 — 20.9 3.2 F 0.2 — F 0.6 3.8 Math 2.9 — 2.3 2.8 8.7 Writing 2.8 Gr 6 avg.0 12.3 3.400: 1.8 7.4 M 0.3 F 0.8 Writing 2.0 3.7 2.4 — F 0.6 — 2.800: -1.6 2. inc.9 2.7 Writing 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $98.2 F 0.1 1.9 3.6 Math 2.8 3.2 3.2 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.9 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.0 — 3.6 3.1 — 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 6. of $88.4 2.5 2.4 3.0 3.2 2.1 n/a 6.7 — Bishop Scalabrini [Catholic] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 21.6 2.8 2.0 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.8 Math 2.0 3. level: Reading n/a 2.7 — 2.4 — F 0.900: 2.8 2.3 1.8 — F 0.0 2.0 2.1 M 0.1 3.9 3.0 3.2 3. inc.8 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.8 2.9 — F 0.2 F 0.0 3.2 F 0.8 29. of $88.0 Writing 2.0 Tests not written (%) 4.3 F 0.2 F 0.1 — Math 3.1 n/a F 0.6 — Blessed Trinity [Catholic] Maple ESL (%): 3.0 p 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 — Aurora Heights [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 2.7 — Math 2.0 Writing 1. of $118.2 3.8 11.1 3.1 F 0.0 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.3 3.8 3.6 2.0 — 2.9 5.8 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.200: 2.8 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.700: 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 10.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 9.1 n/a F 0.1 F 0.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 Writing 3.7 — 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Math 3.1 3.0 3.8 — 2.0 3.4 3.5 Tests not written (%) 7.2 — Math M 0.5 22.9 2. of $70.1 — 2.9 6.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 Special needs (%): 10.9 — 7.8 Tests not written (%) 2.3 p 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.2 4.1 28.1 15.1 3. of $99. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.4 Special needs (%): 11. inc.4 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.3 Tests below standard (%) 42.4 4.0 3. inc. level: Reading 3.2 p 3.1 E — 18.76 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 As-Sadiq Islamic [Private] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 90 Special needs (%): 17. level: Reading 2.4 1.9 — 2.7 p 2.8 2.0 — 2.8 2.8 — Bayview Fairways [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 13.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 E F 0.5 Writing 2.9 2.1 3.5 — 2.6 17.2 3.2 8.2 — Writing 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 3.9 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 3.0 15. of $139.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.3 46.7 — 2.6 2.9 4.0 3.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.4 2.5 2.6 q 2.3 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 9.2 6.9 7.3 7.7 — Boxwood [Public] Markham ESL (%): 29.0 — 7.8 2.6 8.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.1 2.2 — Math 3.9 6 4.9 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 82 Special needs (%): 23.4 M 0.0 20.2 p Black River [Public] Sutton West ESL (%): 2.1 Writing 3.3 6.0 n/a 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.7 — 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.9 8.6 — 2.9 3.7 2. level: Reading 3.4 — 2.1 7.6 2.6 6.9 — 3.3 7.9 3.2 — 31.1 4.7 — 2.3 3.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.3 p Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 M 0.5 Writing 2.6 2.8 2.0 3.0 8.8 17.0 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.0 — 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 3.4 M 0.0 3.1 3.3 — 6.1 — 13.3 3.9 3.9 2.1 8.1 Overall rating out of 10 4.7 2.9 Math 2.6 p . inc.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1723/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.2 F 0.1 7.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 E — 19.8 2.9 3.0 n/a 0.9 3.3 6.8 — 2.2 3.2 3.9 8.1 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.6 F 0.4 n/a n/a n/a E E n/a n/a n/a 14.0 3.9 2.0 Tests not written (%) 4.7 2.0 2.0 Math 3.1 F 0.5 3.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 25.9 2.9 Math 3.4 Math F 0.4 3.9 3.7 — 8.9 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 3.600: 2.1 — Writing 2.4 27.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 F 0.2 — Math 3.5 2.8 Math 2.1 — 2.4 p Bogart [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 13.2 3.9 3.9 2.0 p 6 6.8 3.500: 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — Ballantrae [Public] Stouffville ESL (%): 0.0 2.

7 9. inc.9 2.2 7.6 2.4 — F 0.2 E F 0.1 E — 19.0 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 10.2 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.0 q Overall rating out of 10 9.1 F 0.1 2.3 0.2 F 0.0 2.7 — Cornell Village [Public] Markham ESL (%): 13.2 — Math 3.7 3.8 2.2 3.5 F 0.1 9.9 2.3 E E E p 24.3 2.8 2.9 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 46/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 M 0. inc.7 8.5 4.2 22.1 F 0.2 Math M 0.1 Clearmeadow [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 83 ESL (%): 12.8 3.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.9 3.8 2.2 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 30. inc.1 2.7 11.8 Math 2.3 8.5 8.9 — Math 2.2 9.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 16.8 p 7.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 7.3 F 0.9 6.2 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 3.7 8.8 10. of $105.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 3.2 F 0.2 0.9 q Writing 3. level: Reading 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.0 3.1 3.8 — Writing 2.1 — 2.0 3.9 2.2 F 0.0 1.1 Tests not written (%) 5.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 n/a n/a M 0.9 — Writing 3.9 3.1 3.5 — F 0.1 3.9 2.1 6.8 2.1 3.0 3.8 3.1 — Overall rating out of 10 9 7 4.4 Special needs (%): 12.7 2.3 n/a Charlton [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 51.2 Gr 6 avg.5 2. of $94.2 7.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 2.8 3.8 2.9 — Crosby Heights [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 104 ESL (%): 22.0 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 p 14.8 q 3.9 3.9 — 3.2 F 0.7 2.1 Math 3.0 25.9 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 5.700: 2.5 p 7.4 8.2 — Math M 0.9 0.0 10.7 Overall rating out of 10 9 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 19.3 8.2 — 24.2 — Coledale [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 72 ESL (%): 26.9 2.9 2.7 Writing 2.7 Math 2.7 1. of $76.1 Math M 0.4 M 0.2 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 2. of $65.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 20.1 Math 3.2 F 0.1 2.1 3.2 M 0.2 3.6 Special needs (%): 16.2 7.1 7.8 Special needs (%): 9.7 29.9 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 14.1 8.0 — Math 3.9 3.3 Math 3.0 — 3. inc.8 2.7 Writing 3.4 7.7 11.2 — F 0.3 — F 0.3 — Canadian Martyrs [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 8.3 Special needs (%): 7.6 Tests not written (%) 8.2 1.0 — 9.8 2.5 F 0.9 2. level: Reading 3.2 3.1 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 13.9 — 1.6 — Central Park [Public] Markham ESL (%): 46.9 3.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 2.8 2. level: Reading 3.2 3.7 3.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 20.1 F 0.0 Writing 3.2 3. level: Reading 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 5.6 2.2 E E — Tests below standard (%) 24.2 3.2 7 7.1 M 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 0.1 E F 0.1 F 0.5 27.0 3.8 2.9 2.1 — Writing 2.7 — 2.8 — 6.2 3.8 — Writing 2.6 9.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.1 3. of $89.7 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2. inc.6 2.3 — 2.5 3.4 F 0.8 2.9 q 3.9 2.8 3.0 2.7 26.7 8.0 Gr 6 avg.2 q Overall rating out of 10 5.9 3.1 F 0.3 17.0 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 — Writing 3.9 2.8 19.0 — Writing 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 80 Special needs (%): 11.6 Overall rating out of 10 9.4 3.7 2.1 F 0.9 2.8 2.1 n/a E n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.5 2.0 3.9 3.0 — F 0.2 3.7 25.3 p 2.0 3.0 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 3.1 — E M 0.0 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 29.3 — Math E E F 0.8 2.2 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 3.9 3.9 13.0 3.1 E F 0.7 Overall rank: 86/2742 40/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.9 2.2 — 3.9 2.4 E F 0.4 3.6 3.0 16.5 Overall rank: 438/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Buttonville [Public] Markham ESL (%): 10.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.8 2.7 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 7.4 3.8 2.1 3.0 3.8 3.8 3.2 — Math E M 0.1 3.1 — 3.1 3. inc.7 10.4 2.9 10.8 3.0 3.9 7.8 Writing 2.9 — 2.9 2.0 3.7 2.7 2.1 — Castlemore [Public] Markham ESL (%): 20.9 6. level: Reading 2.8 3.7 q F 0.0 — F 0.0 — 2.1 3.7 q 8.1 — Tests below standard (%) 36.1 7.700: 1.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.1 F 0.7 2.800: 1.1 — M 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 12.0 3.1 F 0.9 7.3 Math 3.7 3. of $65.5 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 5.5 11.3 — 2.8 27.6 6.7 2.1 p Gr 6 enrollment: 87 Special needs (%): 5.0 — 3.5 3.6 3.8 — 2.1 F 0.2 40.2 — Math M 0.3 3.1 3.2 E F 0.0 3.2 3.5 7.7 — Charles Howitt [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 33.2 — Math M 0.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 F 0.8 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.0 p 8.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 6.8 2.9 2.0 3.9 3.0 Gr 6 avg.3 3.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 3.1 — 13.3 3.5 6. level: Reading 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 147/2742 58/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 Math 3.8 2.8 4. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 2.5 F 0.2 26.3 F 0.000: 2.3 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 2.1 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 3.3 Overall rank: 438/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 16.0 Overall rank: 78/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 E E n/a n/a 7.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 8 8.9 — Gr 6 avg.800: 2.8 2.2 3.8 2.8 2.4 — 6.1 3.3 1.3 Math 3.2 2.100: 1.0 3.8 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 9.1 2.1 F 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 F 0.4 6.9 2. inc.0 — 8.1 — Cedarwood [Public] Markham ESL (%): 14.0 3.1 F 0.2 F 0.5 9.8 26.1 6.1 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 3.8 Writing 2.6 2.9 3.7 2.9 3. inc.8 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 3.0 2.0 2.4 7 7.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 67 Special needs (%): 17.700: 1.8 2.9 — Math 3.8 3. of $86.7 2.1 — 3.8 — 3.8 p Tests not written (%) 2.8 5.1 31.4 2.2 2.1 F 0.1 19.1 Tests below standard (%) 12. of $79.6 10.1 n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.1 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.7 — Coppard Glen [Public] Markham ESL (%): 22.3 4. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.9 2.1 Math M 0.1 M 0.7 3.9 2.2 9.9 2.1 2.9 2.4 M 0. level: Reading 3.0 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 Writing 2.500: 1.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.0 2.7 2.7 0.1 — 3.1 10.800: 3.2 2.9 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.2 F 0.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Special needs (%): 7.8 2.0 Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.3 Special needs (%): 16.0 2.1 2.0 Gr 6 avg.7 2.200: 0.8 Math 3.2 — 6.0 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.200: 2. level: Reading 3.1 Writing 3.900: 2.9 — 8.2 M 0.0 3.5 14.2 3.0 p Math 2.1 7.2 3.0 3.600: 1. inc.4 34. of $92.1 3.5 M 0.9 3.7 3.0 Gr 6 avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.7 2.2 Overall rank: 360/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 1. of $74.3 F 0.3 9.8 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.7 2.8 3.9 2.9 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 46/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 — Writing 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 3.5 3.4 q Carrville Mills [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 33.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 F 0.9 3.2 Overall rating out of 10 9.9 — Math 3.5 17.7 2.0 2.8 2.3 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 3.3 Tests not written (%) 7. inc.6 Tests not written (%) 6.7 Overall rank: 714/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.9 3.5 18.9 3.2 3.8 2.5 2.1 M 0.0 20.2 p Math 2.8 — 2.9 1.9 3.7 Writing 2.9 — Corpus Christi [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 7. inc.0 3. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.9 3.0 3.9 2.1 — 3.9 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 — Math 3.0 3.7 2.1 3.6 10.6 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 2.7 2.1 Math M 0.8 2.3 F 0.8 2.0 q 3.1 3.2 — 3.0 2. level: Reading 3.2 — 2.8 5.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $103.0 2.0 2.9 — 2.8 2.8 2.7 7.1 3.4 20.5 13.0 Writing 3.9 2. inc.7 2.2 Writing 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 3.1 Math 3.2 9.7 E F 0.7 Overall rank: 235/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 Math M 0.2 F 0.9 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 — Math 2.3 Special needs (%): 18.2 3.2 F 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 11.8 3.1 — Math 3.2 Writing 3.2 4.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 3.2 3.0 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 3.0 2. of $82.7 — 3.5 2.9 — Writing 3.9 2.000: 0.2 n/a F 0.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.3 Tests below standard (%) 23. level: Reading 3.5 9.3 F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 12.0 — 3.3 3.2 — F 0.2 25.2 F 0.9 2.0 3.9 21.2 M 0.0 q M 0.2 — 3.8 2.4 7.8 2.7 2.1 3.9 — 3.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 9.6 4. inc.7 3.4 18.9 — Math 2.4 F 0.9 — Gr 6 avg.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.9 Math 3.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.5 3. inc.1 2.0 Math 3.9 3.8 — .1 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.0 — F 0.7 2.2 F 0.5 3.0 2.8 6.0 Tests not written (%) 1.9 2.9 2.2 M 0.4 25.1 1.7 2. of $82.5 29.7 2.9 Math 2.8 3.9 2.1 3.1 3.8 2.8 — 2.8 8.1 3.2 5.8 2.4 2.1 3.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.9 2.3 3.1 7.6 2.3 p Writing 2.1 M 0.2 F 0. of $114.6 3.1 Writing 3.3 2.1 Math M 0.1 3.9 — 3.1 F 0.2 Gr 6 avg.9 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 7.0 3.2 3.9 18.2 q 5.9 — Math 2.8 24.0 3.6 2.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 11.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $91.2 3.8 — Writing 2.1 n/a 14.2 9 8.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 3.1 2.8 — 3.4 3.7 13.1 — 2.7 2.3 Tests not written (%) 3.5 Overall rank: 98/2742 58/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 13.8 3.2 6.5 7.9 2.0 2.5 — 0.0 — Writing 2.9 Math 3.0 2.0 24.0 Writing 3.9 3.3 M 0.9 2.4 3.2 21.3 F 0.6 8.3 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 77 Brownridge [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 36.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.9 2.0 2.1 3.9 — Math 3.9 17.9 12.5 12.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — Overall rating out of 10 8 6 7 7.1 23.5 3. level: Reading 3.1 8.1 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.4 2.700: 1.1 F 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.4 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 2.2 Writing 2.1 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 — 3.9 3. inc.

of $123. level: Reading 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 4.3 E E F 0.4 Overall rank: 330/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.200: -2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 3.5 2.9 2.9 9. level: Reading 2.1 11. inc.9 2.4 2. of $99. level: Reading 2.0 18.8 Writing 2.5 — 3.0 1.9 — 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — 2.8 1.1 Math 3.78 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Crossland [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 1.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 68 Special needs (%): 19.9 — Dr Roberta Bondar [Public] Maple Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 40.0 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 2.1 — 3.8 q .4 n/a F 0.6 Math 2.3 36.100: -0.4 F 0.1 3.1 F 0. inc.8 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 Math 3.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.2 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 n/a Devins Drive [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 0.3 2.7 2.300: -1.6 q 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 — 3.1 F 0.3 0.2 Writing 2.000: 2.0 2.9 6.0 Gr 6 avg.4 1.0 3.8 2.8 — 3.8 2.5 — 2.9 8 8.0 Math 3.3 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.3 2.1 — 2.2 4.1 — 3.3 3.1 2.2 F 0.8 — 3.9 Writing 2.9 3.1 Writing 2.8 2. of $80.4 3.7 2.1 — 3.8 1.8 3.8 2.7 Writing 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 1.8 n/a Math n/a 2.1 22.7 3.1 E F 0.4 23.1 — E E M 0.300: -0.0 Math 3. of $104.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 34.9 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 19.1 — 1.8 2.0 3.9 2.2 — 22. level: Reading 2.1 E n/a 15.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 17.0 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.4 Writing 2.8 3.9 3.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.1 0.9 2.4 — 32.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Tests not written (%) 11.7 3.1 2.6 — 2.9 8.6 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 166/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.3 3.1 3.9 — E E F 0.2 n/a F 0.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.7 28.6 2.7 2.2 Tests not written (%) 13.2 Gr 6 avg.2 49.8 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.5 Tests not written (%) 1.7 Writing 2.6 — 10.5 12.5 26.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2. of $51.7 2.2 — F 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 42.8 2.9 Gr 6 avg.3 — 2.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 n/a n/a 27.2 2.5 2.9 Writing 3.3 20.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.6 — 2.4 2.2 3.7 6. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1556/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 18.2 Tests below standard (%) 21. inc.9 — E T Crowle [Public] Markham ESL (%): 7.3 2.9 13.900: 3.2 3.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.3 8.9 Math 2.8 3. inc.5 2.1 5.4 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 1.9 3.6 2.8 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 2.9 Math 3. level: Reading 2.3 — F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 — 3. of $106.4 2.6 — 13.1 F 0.6 8.4 — 0.3 M 0.5 45.2 22.9 2.7 2.7 2.1 — 2.6 17.4 2.1 F 0.9 2.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 Math 2.8 — 2.7 27.1 — 3.1 n/a F 0.3 Ellen Fairclough [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 18.9 Math 3.0 2.9 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14.300: 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 113 Special needs (%): 12.8 Math 2.0 Writing 3.4 2.5 2.7 Tests not written (%) 18.8 2.0 61.1 2.5 Special needs (%): 0.7 — 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.2 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 23.3 1.2 37.0 2.8 — 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 n/a Fairwood [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.3 M 0.9 2.8 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.8 Math 3.3 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 23.6 2.9 3. inc.0 3.0 2.2 2.6 — 6.3 2.5 n/a n/a E M 0.3 — 2.2 n/a n/a 44.6 2.0 2.0 3.0 — 2.2 13.2 Special needs (%): 18.2 3.2 F 0.2 3.9 Writing 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.4 p 5.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 8. inc.7 7.5 7.6 — 7.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.9 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.9 3.0 3.6 1.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6. level: Reading n/a 2.1 — 3.3 7.1 — 7.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 29.7 12.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 58/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.5 Writing 2.7 3.5 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — E M 0.0 2.5 18.6 — 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — 2.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 3.8 2.9 — 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 19.7 Overall rank: 2183/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2. of $80.7 23.4 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 56.8 6.3 Math M 0.6 — Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 34.2 Tests not written (%) 5. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. of $79.1 3. level: Reading n/a 2.4 45. inc.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0. level: Reading 2.8 Math 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.8 3.7 Writing 2.8 Math 2.9 — F 0.3 — F 0.8 3.5 E M 0.3 5.7 — 2.4 — 6.9 3.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 3.1 F 0.2 — 2.5 1.1 3.2 3. level: Reading 2. inc. inc.1 11.1 Math F 0.6 q 2.6 46.1 n/a Math n/a 2.2 Overall rank: 1156/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 27.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.8 Math 3. level: Reading 2.4 — 2.3 8.7 29.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 396/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — 2.0 Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 2.4 Math 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.100: -2.8 32.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 16.0 Math 3.9 7.8 Gr 6 avg.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2. inc.7 2.8 — 2.8 2.1 3.9 Special needs (%): 9.0 2.1 2. inc.9 1.8 Writing 2.1 Discovery [Public] Maple ESL (%): 14.8 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 33/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.100: 3.0 3.0 — 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 22. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 Special needs (%): 4.6 2.9 2. of $89.6 20.2 — 24.0 — 7.8 Father Frederick McGinn [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 0.4 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — 8.0 3.7 3.3 2.5 2.1 — 2.0 2.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.8 2.3 — M 0.900: 1.2 — 31. inc.0 — 2.5 2.0 2.0 3.9 2. inc.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — 19.6 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.8 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 32.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Math 2.9 q 11.0 3.9 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.0 3. level: Reading 2.6 7.3 6.0 3.7 8.1 n/a n/a E M 0.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.3 F 0.7 2.0 2.8 2.3 F 0.6 12.8 — Donald Cousens [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 34.1 2.9 3.2 12.9 3.3 4.1 — 2.1 19.9 Math 2.9 3.8 3.1 q Doncrest [Public] Richmond Hill ESL (%): 32.6 — 8.8 3.400: -0.8 Math 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 Math 2.4 M 0.9 Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2.8 3.7 3.9 Writing 2.1 2.8 2.3 — F 0.2 — F 0.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.8 Writing 2.2 8.5 2.1 Math F 0.6 7.2 2.3 8.2 M 0.3 4.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.9 3.5 2.8 3.7 — 2.9 6.5 — 2.9 3.5 — 2.6 — 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 27.2 3.1 M 0.7 2.8 — F 0.7 2.8 2.4 17.1 — 2.9 3.1 3.5 Tests below standard (%) 43.3 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 31.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.1 — 2.7 0.4 2.2 — F 0.3 Math M 0.3 Tests not written (%) 8.7 2.7 2.9 2.3 2.7 3.5 2.6 2.2 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 152/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 Writing 3.8 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.1 F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 16.2 6.4 2.300: -0.7 2.7 3.2 M 0.7 q 2.9 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.3 2.2 32.8 — 3.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 5.1 2.4 — Deer Park [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.1 E F 0.6 2.9 — 2.8 2.0 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Math M 0.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 17. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.5 7.8 9.8 7.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 30.9 55.8 2.3 8.0 3.6 — Divine Mercy [Catholic] Maple ESL (%): 1.8 6.8 2.7 6.3 14.9 p E J Sand [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 35.6 7.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 8.1 2.9 Writing 3.9 — 2.7 Gr 6 avg.2 2.7 14.8 n/a Math n/a 2.8 Tests not written (%) 4.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $49.0 2.2 3.6 2. level: Reading n/a 2.2 — 5.8 Writing 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 7.4 2. of $90.2 3.4 Tests not written (%) 4.9 Overall rating out of 10 8 Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 22.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 843/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 7.2 Tests below standard (%) 30.0 3.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.0 2.0 2.8 2.8 8.0 2.7 0.1 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.5 8.4 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 15. of $57.0 2.3 — 7 6.800: 2.8 n/a Elder’s Mills [Public] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 18.8 2.1 F 0.0 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.5 — 13.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.9 n/a Writing n/a 3. of $63.0 Tests not written (%) 5.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.6 7.3 M 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.0 2.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 10.1 3.8 2.9 2.6 2.8 — F 0.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 34.4 Writing 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3. level: Reading n/a 2.9 — 3.5 7.0 — 2.8 8.6 Special needs (%): 18.0 14.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 3.9 3.2 8.5 n/a Denne [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 5.1 2.2 Gr 6 avg.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 15.4 2.1 — 2.7 2.9 2.

of $139.9 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.2 — Father John Kelly [Catholic] Maple Gr 6 enrollment: 77 ESL (%): 0.5 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 — Math 3.7 2.7 — 2.4 2.1 3.0 1.5 2.7 8.9 Writing 2.8 — Math 2.8 2.1 p Gr 6 avg.4 2. of $65.4 — Overall rating out of 10 9.8 2.1 33.8 2.3 2. level: Reading 3.5 17.8 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.3 1.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 16.4 2.4 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7 7.1 F 0.2 M 0.2 E F 0.9 6.7 2.1 2.0 3.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 2.6 2.1 2.1 F 0.7 2.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.9 7.1 M 0.1 12.2 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 0.4 — Henderson Avenue [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 61 ESL (%): 14.900: 2.0 10. level: Reading 2.6 18. level: Reading 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.800: -2.8 — E F 0. level: Reading 2.0 3.5 39.4 M 0.8 2.2 5.9 2. inc.1 2.9 — 1.4 24.4 M 0.0 2.9 2.2 2.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 1.7 2.1 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 7.2 — 3.6 1. of $70.8 Special needs (%): 3.9 2.7 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.8 3.8 — 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 91 Special needs (%): 12. of $93.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.6 23.6 F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.5 2.9 3.800: 2.0 2.9 — Gr 6 avg. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1886/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 — Glen Shields [Public] Concord ESL (%): 17.1 F 0.7 2.0 2.2 2.9 2.9 2.1 8.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.300: 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.5 7.5 1.7 5.8 — 2.2 Overall rank: 787/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.8 2.0 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.3 Math M 0.9 3. inc.0 q Writing 3.3 F 0.7 4.0 2.9 3.3 8.7 2.2 3.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 n/a n/a Math M 0.4 Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Writing 3.8 2.1 n/a n/a Math F 0. of $81.1 19.2 Overall rank: 1285/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Gr 6 avg.5 5.0 2.0 2.1 Overall rank: 186/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 — Forest Run [Public] Woodbridge ESL (%): 4.2 Overall rank: 1431/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 2.2 M 0.0 Special needs (%): 22.3 F 0.1 3.9 0.7 2.9 3.6 2.3 F 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 3.1 M 0.7 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 12.9 1.9 Math 3.0 2.2 3.1 E n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.4 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.1 3.8 q 2.4 25. of $112.6 q F 0. level: Reading 2.9 3.9 2.0 3.7 3.1 3.3 E — F 0.6 2.8 — 2.8 2.1 2.6 2.3 8.6 F 0.3 2.5 6.2 3.7 2.6 3.9 Overall rank: 261/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 23.2 F 0.2 2.0 2.1 F 0. inc.9 2.2 Math F 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — 22.9 37.0 30.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 — Math M 0. of $84.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 16.5 2. level: Reading 3.1 F 0.1 — M 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — Writing 2.6 2.1 2.2 3.7 2.5 1. level: Reading 2.2 5.2 — Writing 3.8 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.7 2.8 3.9 2.0 3.6 Writing 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.8 3.2 n/a Fossil Hill [Public] Woodbridge ESL (%): 45.9 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.2 7.7 2.7 — Writing 2.1 M 0.0 5.6 2.1 F 0.8 3.1 6.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 12. inc.5 — Greensborough [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 29.9 5.9 — Writing 2.0 3.9 7.1 — 2.8 3.6 Writing 2.300: 2.8 2.1 Overall rank: 2226/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Math 2.4 25.8 — 3.9 2. inc.7 — Writing 2. inc.1 — Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 3.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.3 E F 0.5 6 7.9 3.1 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.1 E F 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 17.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.8 — Writing 3.3 3. inc.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.1 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.1 — 6.0 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 19.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 8.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.7 26.1 — 2.5 Special needs (%): 7.9 Math 3.200: 1.8 2.8 2.6 1. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.2 — Glad Park [Public] Stouffville ESL (%): 1.9 — Math 3.3 F 0.4 — Writing 2.2 2.500: -0.2 — F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 1.1 3.8 — 2.0 2.1 26.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E M 0.1 3.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.9 3.9 2.9 — Writing 2.8 8.0 — Writing 2.7 1.9 6.9 39.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — Hartman [Public] Aurora Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 17.8 6.8 2. inc. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.1 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.1 F 0.5 8.3 2.6 — 6.7 p Writing 2.1 — Math 3.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.8 2.9 6.8 2.7 2.3 4.8 2.6 2.7 3.4 8.6 2. inc.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.2 32.8 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 21.8 2.6 F 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 29.4 2.9 2.9 — Math 2.6 27.8 2.6 2.1 — Math 3.4 5.2 7.6 26.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 16.8 2.0 2.3 F 0.6 0.3 2.2 6.7 2.9 7.9 — 3.8 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.5 7.6 2.8 n/a Good Shepherd [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 2. inc.2 3.1 3.4 2.2 8.9 2.1 3.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.5 28.3 Math 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.6 2.9 3. of $83.9 3.3 E — Math M 0.1 M 0.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 79 Father Henri J M Nouwen [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 67 ESL (%): 1.3 8.8 2.3 6.8 — Math 2.1 E — 27. of $78.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 2.9 5.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 Tests not written (%) 4.2 8.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.7 — 1.9 3.0 3.0 Gr 6 avg.9 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.9 — Math 3.6 0.6 2.2 2.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.8 2.2 F 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.8 2.2 2.1 Special needs (%): 8.3 2.0 3.5 2.3 6.9 3.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.9 2.9 3.9 32.1 M 0.7 4.9 2.9 3.5 — Writing 3.5 — 2. of $91.9 21.1 F 0.9 Math 2.3 23.8 — Gr 6 avg.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 40.2 — Franklin Street [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 78 ESL (%): 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.3 Overall rank: 261/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 8 7.3 E — Tests below standard (%) 23.7 — 2.7 — H G Bernard [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 36.900: -0.6 Writing 2.000: 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.2 — Tests below standard (%) 24.7 2.7 2.6 2.1 3.9 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 M 0.1 — 1.8 2.1 3.7 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.1 3.5 2.1 E E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.5 2.9 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 2. of $91.7 — Writing 2.4 2.2 F 0.5 20.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.1 F 0.9 2.9 4.9 2.9 — Writing 2.1 F 0.7 13.0 2.3 27.500: 1.7 2.4 2.2 F 0.8 2.8 Special needs (%): 6.1 56.1 2.8 3.1 2.8 2.8 — 2.3 — Math E F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.2 3.8 — Math 2. of $91.1 3.2 4.0 3.1 E M 0.1 3.9 — Math 3.6 1.0 26.9 — Tests not written (%) 3.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 19.2 M 0.3 F 0.2 M 0.2 7.7 33.1 3.4 17.700: 0.8 6. of $96.3 25.9 2.3 4.1 p Tests below standard (%) 18.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 — 7.1 32.8 Overall rating out of 10 7. level: Reading 2.8 3.9 2.4 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 37.9 Gr 6 avg.7 2.9 q Math 2.0 3.8 — Math 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.7 2.9 20. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 35.9 2. inc.2 8 8.9 2.8 3.1 2.1 — F 0.8 3.1 F 0.7 — 2.9 p 2.2 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.3 — Math M 0. level: Reading 2.2 — F 0.5 2.9 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 1.2 M 0.8 6.1 F 0.8 2.8 2.1 14.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.9 2.7 2.9 — Writing 2.300: 0.9 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 M 0.9 — Writing 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 M 0.3 F 0.6 1.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 7.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 E n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 26.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.3 0.6 F 0.8 23.9 3.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 4.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 — .7 2.8 6.8 27.4 F 0.1 2.600: -0.7 — Math 2.6 2.2 3.9 5.7 3.7 2.9 — Harry Bowes [Public] Stouffville Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 6.1 2.9 Writing 2.3 8.3 2.8 3.9 22.8 — 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 22.5 2.2 F 0.7 — Glen Cedar [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.7 3.3 3.0 3.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 6.9 — 6.6 2.8 — Math 2.0 — German Mills [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 19.6 23.2 3.1 3.9 2.1 Writing 3.1 — 22.1 F 0.8 2.1 3.0 — F 0.2 M 0.2 — 2.9 7. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 Special needs (%): 18.1 — Gr 6 avg.1 15.1 0.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.400: -0.9 2.2 F 0.7 2.1 — Writing 3.3 — 3.8 2.0 2.7 17.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.3 7.7 — Writing 2.7 — Math 3.4 2. level: Reading 2.6 16.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Overall rank: 511/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.1 Tests not written (%) 12.0 2.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 7.1 F 0. of $84.1 F 0.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 18.3 3. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.1 p 27.8 Math 3.6 3.5 6.5 15.0 21.1 F 0.8 2.1 Tests not written (%) 2.0 2.9 21.0 25. inc.8 2.5 7.8 2.1 3.2 F 0.8 2.1 3.3 F 0.2 10.7 — Math 3.0 2.0 2.0 Tests not written (%) 2.1 7.1 E M 0.6 Writing 2.0 3.6 3.5 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 8.9 3.0 Special needs (%): 25.2 7.8 43.5 2.8 2. inc.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 Special needs (%): 7.1 F 0.8 6.2 Math 3.8 — 2.5 Math 2.6 — Math M 0.8 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.8 — Math 2.8 2.2 M 0.

0 2.7 3.1 — 33.2 3.6 — Writing 3.2 3.100: -0.4 — 2.5 5.5 — Holland Landing [Public] Holland Landing Gr 6 enrollment: 42 ESL (%): 2.3 — 23. level: Reading 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.3 7.3 3.5 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 27.7 2.500: -1.8 2.4 3.7 — Writing 2.0 2.8 3.5 5.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 23 Special needs (%): 43.4 2. of $154.2 Overall rank: 573/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 3.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.4 Special needs (%): 2.1 23.6 17.9 — 2.9 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.6 2.9 — 2.6 2.1 17.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.8 3.0 — 6 7.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.3 34. level: Reading 2.7 Math M 0.2 F 0.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.4 Writing 2.8 0. level: Reading 2.2 4.9 Math 2.5 6.5 2.7 2.8 3.1 F 0.9 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 F 0.9 2.7 3.9 2.3 F 0.8 27.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 37.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.9 6.6 2.5 2.3 6.7 2.4 2.8 7.6 2.0 3.2 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.7 2.5 Gr 6 avg.0 9.4 2.0 2.5 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.1 Math F 0.0 3.5 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 15.9 2.8 — Math 2.7 2.1 F 0.7 7.1 9.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 35.2 F 0.8 — Highview [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 4.8 2.2 q Tests not written (%) 13. inc.8 2.3 2.4 E M 0. of $86. level: Reading 2.9 Tests not written (%) 2.0 3.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 — 7.6 16.7 2.8 2.4 0.7 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Math 2.8 3.9 2.2 n/a Math n/a 3.2 — Holy Family [Catholic] Thornhill ESL (%): 8.8 — 2.3 3.7 Writing 2.2 23.4 2.1 2.8 3.9 2.9 9.5 8.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 72 Special needs (%): 8.9 3.1 2.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 28.0 3. inc.6 Kettleby [Public] Kettleby Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 5.8 3.4 Writing 2.7 Overall rank: 787/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.7 2.100: 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.6 7.6 10.6 — 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 9. level: Reading 2.5 — 2.6 n/a 29.1 F 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.4 1.9 — Gr 6 avg.2 3.8 n/a Holy Jubilee [Catholic] Maple ESL (%): 2.0 — John McCrae [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 70 ESL (%): 18.0 1.7 2.3 n/a Math M 0.6 36.6 — Writing 2.1 2.8 8.6 2.1 3.6 2. inc.1 Tests not written (%) 8.1 — 25.0 2.9 — F 0.3 n/a M 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 0.8 2.9 — Math 3.1 F 0.2 q Immaculate Conception [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.6 Math 2.0 — Math 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 3.8 0.3 0.5 18.4 — 10.4 8.5 0.9 2.7 7. level: Reading 2.2 p 10.6 9.9 3.1 n/a M 0.0 2.7 2.6 — Math 2.9 3.7 2.5 — 3.5 2.4 7.4 Special needs (%): 19.1 q 6.6 2.0 2.6 1.80 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Herbert H Carnegie [Public] Maple Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 18.6 2.2 20.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — 2.1 35.6 — 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 26.9 — 2.300: -1.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 38.1 Tests below standard (%) 43.2 27.7 2.0 p 3.6 2.5 — Holy Spirit [Catholic] Aurora ESL (%): 9.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 n/a M 0.1 7 6.1 E n/a F 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.3 n/a 47.6 6.6 3.7 2.6 6.3 — M 0.6 2.2 n/a F 0.2 23. level: Reading 2.9 16. of $72.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.3 n/a Highgate [Public] Markham ESL (%): 48.5 Math 2.1 n/a F 0.7 2.3 n/a Math E M 0.6 2.8 Writing 1. of $86.8 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 15.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.4 5.8 — Math 2.5 Writing 2.1 2.4 — Johnsview Village [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 25.7 2.4 18.8 Overall rank: 396/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 Tests not written (%) 3.0 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.7 2.6 q Gr 6 avg.8 Math 2.9 2.2 Writing 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 29.7 — Writing 2.5 9.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.1 n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.9 3.8 2.1 2.6 2.7 — Writing 2.9 — 7.8 Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 6.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 28.7 — 2.7 25.1 6.7 Gr 6 avg.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.9 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 18.3 7.6 Overall rank: 667/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math E Tests below standard (%) 43.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.4 11.6 — 2.5 8.3 F 0.5 6.0 2.5 Math 2.7 — Math 3. inc.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 2083/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 F 0.200: -1.4 Joseph A Gibson [Public] Maple ESL (%): 21.9 3.9 — Writing 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 Math 2.9 2.3 5.8 — 2.6 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.8 23. inc.8 2.6 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 2. inc.3 24.3 7.1 Math M 0.8 24.8 — Math 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 62.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 96 Special needs (%): 3.9 2.0 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2183/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — Writing 2.5 2. level: Reading n/a 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — .5 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 p F 0.7 3.3 3.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 14. of $133.3 M 0.8 4.1 n/a E M 0.3 Tests not written (%) 6.1 2.6 39.7 2.5 Overall rank: 58/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 Overall rank: 573/2742 107/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.1 3.0 2. level: Reading n/a 2.4 16.6 2.1 — F 0.3 7.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.3 3.9 2.0 1.9 2.5 — 2.9 — Math 3.4 11.5 Writing 2.9 6. of $56.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.5 32.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 3.8 Math 2.9 3.0 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.2 2.1 41.5 2.5 7.8 2.2 F 0.5 8.3 F 0.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1251/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — 2.6 28.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.8 — Writing 2.3 2.1 n/a F 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — 7.8 4.0 — Gr 6 avg.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.7 2.3 7.0 — Math 2.400: 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 M 0.8 2.7 — F 0.0 n/a Math n/a 2.1 2.9 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.9 31.8 3. level: Reading 2.1 Gr 6 avg.5 7.1 15.1 2.1 1.6 26.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 n/a Writing n/a 2.2 6.8 2.4 — 1.0 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.4 12.8 2.1 3.1 p Overall rating out of 10 6.2 22.0 Special needs (%): 8.9 2.9 7.9 Writing 2.9 7.4 2.8 2.4 7.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 Math 2.1 3.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 5.6 2.1 p 2.1 2. of $100.6 — 2.5 1.9 2.5 n/a M 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.8 2.1 2.0 3.8 3.0 p 2.2 2.0 3. of $48.9 — 3.1 2.2 E F 0.7 3.6 — 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 8.7 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2. level: Reading 2.4 Math F 0.5 — Tests not written (%) 8.8 2.8 2.8 2.5 Gr 6 avg.5 5. level: Reading 2.9 3.0 2.8 Jersey [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.6 2.8 — 2.8 — 2.8 20.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.0 — Math 3.8 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 2.4 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 2.0 — 6.7 2.4 3.8 2.6 p 2.9 3.3 — 6.8 — 2.6 — 6.4 F 0.7 2.8 2.3 n/a n/a n/a F 0. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 1.3 — 2.7 9.7 2.0 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 5.7 3.1 F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 27.0 3.9 23.1 M 0.8 4.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.9 15.7 7.3 9.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 9.7 — Holy Name [Catholic] King City Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 26.0 — 3.4 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 3.2 E E E — 25.6 7.9 11.2 Writing 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2. inc.8 3.6 Math 2.9 Math 3.2 3.6 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.5 0.5 2.9 — Math 3.8 2. of $83.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.600: 0.1 M 0.8 Tests not written (%) 1.2 F 0.9 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 21.4 Gr 6 avg.0 3.9 2.8 2.9 2.4 8.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 0. level: Reading 1.1 F 0.9 — 2.1 16.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 36. inc.9 2.0 2.7 2.2 — M 0.300: 1.6 6.9 2.4 — 2.6 2.8 — Writing 3. inc.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.8 2. inc.5 2.8 2.5 Writing 2.8 2.8 30.3 2.9 — F 0.6 3.8 45.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.1 Tests not written (%) 12.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 — Writing 2.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.7 Math 2.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 0.5 3.7 2.9 — 2. level: Reading 2.5 Writing 2.9 2.0 3.0 36.1 8.5 Writing 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 — F 0.6 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.100: 0.1 p 2.1 F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.5 2.3 — F 0.1 3.4 3.2 5.300: -0.9 2.5 2.7 2. of $63.5 — F 0.9 7.7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 p 2.400: -0.0 2. level: Reading 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.7 — 1.500: 0.7 2.2 7 9.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 2.8 — Writing 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.6 Math 2.1 F 0.2 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 20.1 3.4 3. level: Reading 2.7 3.3 — 5.4 2.8 4.8 2.5 3.0 43.5 2.0 3.9 9. of $85.7 42.6 Special needs (%): 4. inc.8 2.1 F 0.9 2.1 9. inc.1 3.0 3.7 Writing 2.6 2.2 5. inc.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.7 8.9 2.0 2.7 2.8 3.4 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.8 3.0 — Kateri Tekakwitha [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0. of $187.0 2.8 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 34.9 3.4 2. of $133.8 — Math 2. of $116.300: -0.0 2.7 2.9 2.6 3.0 35.9 Math 2.1 7.7 22.3 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 — F 0.4 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 E F 0.6 — 4.8 2.500: -1.9 3.9 3.1 n/a M 0.8 4.0 p Writing 2.2 5.4 2.0 2.9 — 2.6 2.6 Special needs (%): 11.1 2.5 2.9 2.5 — 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.0 3.

1 3. of $100.8 Special needs (%): 6.1 3.0 4.6 5.6 2.0 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 28.7 2.5 2. inc.1 F 0.1 Math 3.3 — Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 17.4 2.9 2.2 1.1 Writing 3. level: Reading 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.4 0.8 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.9 14.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.6 2.7 Math 2.8 61.8 — Light of Christ [Catholic] Aurora ESL (%): 0.1 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.800: -1.0 2.1 3.8 Writing 2.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.0 2. inc.8 2.9 3.5 2.2 2.7 2.9 Gr 6 avg.3 p M 0.1 6.4 20.7 2. of $143.5 Special needs (%): 12. inc.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 F 0.8 2.6 2.0 3.7 2.7 2.0 3.2 3.9 15. of $93.2 M 0.4 2.1 M 0.4 52.9 — Math 2.3 31.9 2.7 2.7 3.8 Gr 6 avg. inc.0 0.9 3.4 M 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 28.2 p Writing 3.9 3.3 F 0.5 2.4 q 2.3 F 0.8 3.0 3.4 Math 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 3.6 Math 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — 2.7 2.1 n/a Lorna Jackson [Public] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 24. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 n/a M 0.8 2. inc.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.2 Tests not written (%) 3.2 3. level: Reading 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 n/a F 0.5 — Mackenzie Glen [Public] Maple ESL (%): 15.5 24. level: Reading 2.5 2. inc.2 Tests below standard (%) 43. of $59.1 2.7 3.8 2.8 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 6.1 3.2 Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.6 — Writing 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9. level: Reading 2.4 3.6 7.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 2.2 F 0.1 — 2.0 2.9 17.9 45.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Writing 2.6 2.9 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 6.6 2.5 6 6.2 n/a F 0.4 — Writing 3.5 2.0 Math 3.8 3.3 — 42.9 7.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 — 45.7 3.9 2.4 1.0 p 4.7 — Math 2.7 — 2.3 F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 1.9 3.1 — F 0.1 2.3 n/a Math M 0.0 5.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 6.0 — Math 3.4 23.3 E — M 0.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.3 3.1 8.3 2.9 2.500: 1.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.0 Special needs (%): 5. level: Reading 2.5 1.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 q Legacy [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 7.3 Tests below standard (%) 23.400: -1.8 3.6 2.4 17. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.0 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $81.0 3. level: Reading 2.8 — 0.4 Math 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 3.1 F 0.4 2.7 9.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2.7 27.8 — E F 0.0 6.3 Overall rank: 964/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 2.8 3.4 F 0.6 Overall rank: 121/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.7 2.700: -2.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 3.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.0 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $80.7 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.9 2.4 — n/a F 0.1 6.1 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 36.6 — Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 9.4 p 3.2 0.7 — 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 23.7 20.8 2.6 2.4 F 0.9 2.2 Writing 2.3 3.7 3.4 n/a F 0.2 Overall rank: 2075/2742 2172/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.0 10. inc.0 2.8 2.0 4.7 2.2 F 0.1 31.9 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 2.3 Math M 0.0 2.5 22.0 3.9 40.1 Overall rank: 45/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 p Tests not written (%) 3.3 32.5 Overall rank: 295/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 — Lakeside [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 11.5 2.1 2.0 3.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 23.1 Math M 0.7 2.1 M 0.5 q 0.9 — 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.2 5.3 n/a F 0.8 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.8 Math 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.0 27.9 3.7 2.1 — Math M 0.2 8.0 1.1 3.9 2.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 20. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.400: 1.5 Lake Simcoe [Public] Keswick Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 0.1 F 0.1 7.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 0.6 2.8 3.3 6.5 Overall rank: 295/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 43.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.1 3.8 7.8 2.0 — 2.8 2.2 F 0.9 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.9 3.5 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 3.0 — 2.6 7.5 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 Little Rouge [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 18.7 2.3 6.6 Writing 2.5 2.4 7 6.7 2.3 3.4 — 10.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.4 2.4 — 2.1 15.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 — 2.5 2.0 3.0 3.1 F 0.1 2.1 F 0.6 2.9 2.5 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 2.8 2.8 — Writing 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 8.9 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 12.7 — 4.8 4.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.4 24.5 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.200: 0.1 3.1 n/a M 0.5 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.5 Special needs (%): 12.6 M 0.2 2.6 8.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 81 King City [Public] King City ESL (%): 5.1 n/a F 0.8 Writing 2. of $71.8 2.1 3.8 4.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 3.8 n/a Maple Leaf [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 11.0 — 3.6 Overall rank: 902/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 3.8 — 2.6 2.1 F 0.2 4.9 2.3 2.7 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 19.1 MacLeod’s Landing [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 61 ESL (%): 31.9 — 2.4 E F 0.3 7.8 2.200: 1. inc.1 2.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 2.7 3.5 — Writing 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 9.2 2.1 Math M 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.9 3.5 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 23.0 Writing 3. of $92.2 3.1 25.9 — 2.1 — 28.4 3.8 2.9 2.9 4.9 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.400: 0.1 — 40.4 12.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.6 q 3.9 3.3 — Math 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.5 38.9 3.7 n/a Writing n/a 3.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 2.1 — 2.8 3.6 7.7 — 2. of $75.8 Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 21.5 Gr 6 avg.9 2.5 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.1 — Math 3.8 0.9 2.2 E n/a 15.5 Writing 2.9 2.3 M 0.4 E — F 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Writing 2.4 M 0. inc.2 2.7 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.6 2.6 3.100: 0.1 M 0.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3.1 3.8 3.7 q 2.6 3.5 2.900: -0. of $172.9 0.0 3.2 8.9 — Kleinburg [Public] Maple ESL (%): 0.2 n/a M 0.7 3.7 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a E E F 0.0 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.3 2.3 E F 0.0 Special needs (%): 8. level: Reading 3.0 2.8 Math 3.9 3.2 44.7 2.5 Math 2.1 E F 0.6 2.1 M 0.4 2.1 F 0.8 Math 2.0 3.600: 3.1 7.4 2.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.8 8.1 6.4 — Math 3.7 — Writing 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 20.6 2.7 2.1 M 0.9 2.6 24.2 F 0.7 3.2 2.600: 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 3.3 — 2.9 2. inc.5 26.8 17. of $100.2 3.3 9.4 F 0.7 2.8 4.8 2. of $82.4 — .300: 2.2 5.0 3.3 E — 30.8 — 11.6 3.9 3.8 2.3 15.2 — Tests not written (%) 5.6 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2. inc.1 Special needs (%): 6.2 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 14.0 — 2.5 3.7 8.8 2.6 6.0 3.1 p 2.1 3.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 p 6.2 2.8 2.0 p 3.7 6.9 3. level: Reading 2.1 — 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 3.2 Gr 6 avg.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 Math 3.8 2.0 — 2.1 Gr 6 avg.5 8.1 n/a F 0.2 — Writing 3.4 — 2.3 8. level: Reading 2. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.2 32.4 2.4 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 — 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 8.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 19.8 — 2.6 2.7 q 2.0 4.7 2.1 8.7 4.8 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2.7 — 2.0 2.4 2.9 — Le-Petit-Prince [Catholic] Vaughan Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 5.5 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.5 n/a F 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.4 2.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 78 Special needs (%): 0.2 E n/a Math M 0. level: Reading 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.6 5.7 — Math 2.3 M 0.5 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 1.6 Special needs (%): 6.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 — Writing 3.2 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 3.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 19 Special needs (%): 26.2 3.4 0.7 Math 2.7 2.8 3.5 Tests not written (%) 17.6 2.6 — 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 54.2 Math M 0.9 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 0. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 F 0.9 3.6 — 2.7 2.2 20.6 4.0 Special needs (%): 29.9 2.1 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 3.7 2.6 Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.3 F 0.8 — 4.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.6 8.3 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 3.9 15.1 8. level: Reading 2.8 Gr 6 avg.2 — Gr 6 avg.4 3. of $154.8 3.0 3.9 16.8 — Maple Creek [Public] Maple ESL (%): 16.8 — Gr 6 avg.2 E — M 0.8 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 7.4 — 2.2 21.6 2.1 3.7 Math 2.300: 2.1 2.3 F 0.9 33.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.5 — F 0.0 0.1 n/a Lake Wilcox [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 65 ESL (%): 18.9 7.3 — 2.600: -1.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2183/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2. level: Reading 2. inc.7 — F 0.8 2.6 Writing 2.8 2.4 7.9 q 7.6 2.7 2.8 2.5 Overall rank: 843/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 24.7 3.6 — Math 2. inc.0 0.2 29.7 3.1 7.4 26.0 — 2.2 M 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 F 0.6 — 2.0 1.9 2.8 3.3 F 0.2 M 0.1 2.5 Math 2.0 0.0 3.1 8.9 q 6.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.6 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 2.7 n/a Lincoln Alexander [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 59 ESL (%): 13.0 3.0 3. of $92.2 E F 0.7 2. of $88.8 44.0 0.5 Tests not written (%) 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.7 Writing 2.5 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.0 3.2 13.5 Writing 2.1 2.8 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.0 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — M 0.6 2.8 6.2 — 1. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.3 7.3 2.6 2.2 — M 0.1 8.6 2.

3 F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 27.1 F 0.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 2.7 Writing 2. of $95.9 2.0 9.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 1.7 Math 2.4 — F 0.2 9.9 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 23.8 2.9 3.6 2. inc.1 — Writing 3.2 — Morning Glory [Public] Pefferlaw ESL (%): 0.2 E M 0.4 3.6 2.1 14. level: Reading 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.1 3.8 3.1 31.9 2.9 Special needs (%): 17.0 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.2 F 0.7 2.9 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.000: 1.0 — 3.8 3.4 2.7 2.1 Special needs (%): 11.9 6.5 6.3 n/a Milliken Mills [Public] Unionville ESL (%): 11.400: 3.9 — Writing 3.9 13.4 1. of $97.7 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.9 3.0 3.8 2.7 18. inc.5 Special needs (%): 9.8 2. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.2 7.4 n/a 44.7 2.4 3.9 p Writing 2.4 F 0. of $75.8 3.1 6.8 49.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 — F 0.7 2.2 — Math 2.3 8.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 2.2 M 0.2 3.1 0.9 2.7 2.1 — E M 0.300: 2.6 20.4 18.2 M 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.6 7.6 2.9 3.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.8 2.5 2.4 Special needs (%): 19.9 2.2 2. of $145.6 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 — 30.2 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 11.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 18.9 Special needs (%): 9.2 F 0.6 4.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 4.8 6.2 7.4 2.0 0.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 13.9 2.9 2.3 F 0.5 7.2 q Notre Dame [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 106 ESL (%): 0.3 Overall rank: 1156/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.1 5.8 26.1 7.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.9 3.4 Math 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — Math M 0.0 2.1 M 0.4 Special needs (%): 20.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 F 0.5 2.4 — 7.2 F 0.9 Math 3.2 2. of $106.7 — Writing 2. inc.9 2.7 — Writing 2.6 2.1 E F 0.4 3.9 9.3 F 0.8 — Writing 3. inc.6 — Tests not written (%) 7.9 4.4 8.0 3.1 M 0.8 22.8 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 360/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rank: 787/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.6 2.3 2.8 Tests not written (%) 7.9 2.8 2. of $97.9 2.8 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.5 4.4 2.6 17. of $77.5 — Tests not written (%) 1.8 2.2 — .6 5.9 2.8 2.9 — Writing 2.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.5 q 2.0 3.6 2.1 — Math 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.1 2.5 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.7 2.9 3.7 7.8 27.7 — F 0.0 2.9 Overall rank: 1087/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.3 7 7.8 Tests not written (%) 6. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 475/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 2.5 33.9 2.1 2.0 Overall rank: 714/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 24.7 q Math 3.8 2.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 7. level: Reading 3.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 32.8 2.8 2.3 F 0.4 q 2.7 2.1 q 17.6 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.0 2.8 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.6 2.0 3. inc.2 F 0.6 6.0 Overall rank: 147/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 Gr 6 avg.8 3.8 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 13.8 q 2.8 6.7 Writing 2.9 Special needs (%): 19.8 2.1 3.8 31.3 — 6.5 — Tests not written (%) 4.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2. inc.1 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.6 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.7 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.5 — 4.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 11.9 1.9 3.9 2.300: 1.1 11.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 12.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 2.1 M 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 3. inc.6 8.6 2. of $90.8 2.3 — Michael Cranny [Public] Maple ESL (%): 38.1 F 0.8 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 9.4 F 0.1 F 0.7 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 17.7 3.8 14.0 2.8 2.4 12.2 29.7 3. inc.0 3.3 2.0 — Math 2.9 2.8 2.2 n/a 19.1 F 0.5 Special needs (%): 5.1 3.3 M 0.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 21.0 3.8 — Math 2.9 2.8 2.2 5.1 3.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 5.7 3.0 2. level: Reading 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 5. level: Reading n/a n/a 3.1 3.3 Tests not written (%) 14.7 Math 2.8 2.5 17.9 24.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 F 0.1 F 0.5 6. inc.7 2.7 — Math 2.5 2.0 — Writing 2.7 8 8.0 2.3 2.9 3.8 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.9 3.6 2.8 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 6.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.1 E n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 21.2 M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 n/a M 0.1 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.0 — 3.8 2. level: Reading 3.8 23.1 7.3 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 34.6 — Tests not written (%) 5.7 2.0 3.4 8.82 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Markham Gateway [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 15.0 3.7 2.4 q Tests below standard (%) 25.0 q Moraine Hills [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 20.1 — 2.0 2.8 — 2.1 3.2 E — Math F 0. level: Reading 2.9 5.4 1.8 2.0 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.1 M 0.9 3.1 3.2 6.0 2.0 3.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 — 4.6 5.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.8 — Math 3.5 50. level: Reading 2.5 2.6 3.9 Writing 2.7 17.9 10 9.5 6.8 2.6 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 17.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.9 28.2 Overall rank: 1215/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $70.1 F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.1 — 2.6 2.5 2.0 — Writing 2.6 — Writing 2.4 2.8 2.6 — 2.7 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 25.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 M 0.9 3.8 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.7 21.7 2.1 — Math 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 43.6 8.5 — Meadowbrook [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 5.4 5.1 F 0.5 Writing 2.1 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2548/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 3.8 2.3 E — Math F 0.5 Special needs (%): 15.2 — Math 3.8 25.8 2.5 22.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.9 — 3. of $76. level: Reading 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.500: 1.8 — 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 — 3.2 F 0.6 2.8 — Writing 2.1 2.6 2.5 — Tests below standard (%) 18.6 7 7.8 2.2 23.9 2.7 3.5 28.3 2.6 2.0 12.9 2.6 n/a Northern Lights [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 9.7 2.8 2.5 7.5 2.4 7.1 E F 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.6 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 16. level: Reading 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 5.1 30.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 — 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 3.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.200: 0.8 2.8 2.0 2.7 n/a Oscar Peterson [Public] Stouffville Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 9.600: -0.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0. level: Reading 2.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 Overall rating out of 10 9.9 2.9 — Math 2.5 2.0 3.9 2. inc.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 6. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.1 — Oak Ridges [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 79 ESL (%): 11.5 11.7 3.9 2.6 3.100: 2.3 E M 0.1 2. of $47.7 Overall rank: 71/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.8 6.9 3.1 F 0.500: -0.7 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.2 Overall rank: 1215/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 2.0 3.3 6.0 3.8 2.9 3.9 6.1 3.3 Math F 0.4 F 0.9 32. level: Reading 2.2 3.3 3.2 6. inc.4 21.9 — Math 2.0 32.6 2.0 3.7 Overall rank: 147/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.8 2.5 F 0.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.6 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 23.2 F 0.8 5.9 — 2.7 3.1 3.5 2.7 Gr 6 avg.9 — Mount Joy [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 43.0 3.7 2.9 6.3 4.1 E E E F 0.3 F 0.8 Writing 2.7 2.9 — Writing 3.8 — 8 8.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.4 6. level: Reading 2.5 18. level: Reading 2.0 3.8 — Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 E F 0.3 — 2.2 3.6 — 2.8 4.2 7.7 3.6 — O M MacKillop [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 12.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.3 F 0.8 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 p E F 0.5 Math 2.9 3.9 2.0 3.5 32. level: Reading 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.0 2.4 p Mount Albert [Public] Mount Albert Gr 6 enrollment: 73 ESL (%): 1.7 n/a F 0.9 3.1 p 3.6 7 7.1 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.100: -3.4 q Gr 6 avg.600: 2.9 — Math 3.7 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.1 F 0.700: -0.1 7.8 3.0 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.1 n/a n/a n/a M 0.200: 0.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 32.8 2.5 Math 2.8 2. of $57.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.3 Our Lady Help of Christians [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 52 ESL (%): 11.7 Gr 6 avg.0 35.9 2.8 Special needs (%): 12.0 3.700: 0.3 Writing 2.7 Writing 3.3 5.0 25.4 — Mother Teresa [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 7.2 Gr 6 avg. inc.8 — Math 2.3 24.0 54.4 M 0.8 2.7 3.7 2.1 n/a Math E E n/a n/a M 0.2 M 0.2 6 6.6 2.7 2.9 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.3 q Overall rating out of 10 8 7.4 2.3 3.1 F 0.0 2.4 F 0.3 2.8 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 33.0 2.8 2.7 — 12.9 2.4 8.9 3.6 — Writing 2.9 Overall rank: 475/2742 73/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — Gr 6 avg.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 8.0 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 28.7 5.5 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 3. of $97.4 7.4 n/a n/a 18.0 Math 3.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 2.7 2.0 3.5 q Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2. of $56.3 3.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.4 2.9 q Tests not written (%) 3.1 9. inc.8 2.1 3.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 5.9 2.8 2.1 4.3 n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 — Math M 0.7 2.9 3.6 2.8 3.3 7.3 F 0.8 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.6 2.8 2.2 — Math E F 0.9 2.8 6.1 8 9.0 2. inc.0 2.7 — 6. inc.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.3 19.2 M 0.0 — 3.2 F 0.8 2.3 M 0.6 Math 2.7 Writing 2.2 Tests not written (%) 7.8 — Math 2.

1 F 0.0 2.2 1.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 17.5 F 0.0 1.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.8 — 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 0.5 2.1 F 0.6 2.4 E — Tests below standard (%) 29. level: Reading 2.3 n/a Math M 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 14.6 13.9 3.8 2.2 3.9 3.6 2.9 Our Lady of Peace [Catholic] Maple Gr 6 enrollment: 68 ESL (%): 1. of $92. of $87.3 7. level: Reading 2.000: 0.9 2.0 — Writing 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 — Writing 2.1 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.7 q Tests not written (%) 16.8 Tests not written (%) 11.8 Tests not written (%) 6.5 2.6 Writing 2.9 — Math 2.7 2.200: 0.8 q 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.1 Overall rank: 714/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.8 9.1 — 22.8 Overall rating out of 10 8.5 — Math F 0.2 M 0.9 2.7 2.8 30.7 2.4 F 0.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.1 p Tests below standard (%) 47.2 3.1 2.6 2.0 12.7 7 7.2 F 0.8 3.2 — F 0.2 E F 0.9 3.9 q Our Lady of the Annunciation [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 5. inc. level: Reading 2.5 2.9 — Math 2.6 8.3 13.8 2.6 3.0 23.8 — Math 2.7 2.9 2.3 F 0.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 1.2 22.6 — Math 2.0 — 2.9 2.5 4.5 3.1 M 0.4 E — Tests below standard (%) 20.6 2.5 q Tests not written (%) 4.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 13.9 39.7 5.2 F 0.6 2.8 Writing 2.1 E F 0.1 F 0.7 3.8 2.6 2.5 35.7 — Writing 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 3.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.0 3.8 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.7 2. inc.1 5.8 — Writing 2.9 2. level: Reading 3.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 121/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3. inc.5 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 83 Our Lady of Fatima [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 92 ESL (%): 0.0 3.8 — 2.7 — Writing 2.6 — Parkview [Public] Unionville ESL (%): 20.5 Math F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 5. of $136.0 3.9 2.5 14.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.3 p 6.2 — Math M 0.2 3.8 Math 2.3 — Pine Grove [Public] Woodbridge ESL (%): 11.2 3.9 2.7 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.6 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 5.4 3.1 3.2 3.2 — 3.5 — 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7 7.8 — .2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.0 3.8 3.2 F 0.2 3.9 20.9 2.1 3.9 — F 0.7 2.1 1.3 20.3 3.9 2.6 2.1 3.1 Special needs (%): 23.6 F 0.5 — 7 7.9 — Writing 2.2 F 0.3 M 0.7 2.9 2.8 2.3 — Prince Charles [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 0.7 2.8 3.1 5.9 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.1 M 0.0 3.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7. inc.8 27.1 3.9 — Math 2.9 3.7 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 12.6 2.1 3.8 6.5 2.1 n/a F 0.0 3.7 — Writing 2.5 F 0.5 21.7 3.8 2.0 3.3 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.4 2.1 F 0.7 2.4 2.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.4 — 2.8 2.1 3.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.8 — Writing 3.8 26.0 Writing 3.9 7.4 25.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 8.6 — Tests not written (%) 2.2 3.2 26.3 Math M 0.4 F 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 396/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3. of $54. of $78.7 2.4 0.1 3.7 — Our Lady of Good Counsel [Catholic] Sharon Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.8 — Math 3.2 33.3 n/a n/a Math E F 0.8 7.1 M 0.5 2.5 — 21.8 31.9 7.9 2.0 Special needs (%): 19. level: Reading 2.7 3.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.6 Overall rank: 71/2742 40/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.600: -1.7 2.9 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.5 3.1 3.6 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 9.6 2.0 3.0 — Math 2.9 Overall rank: 623/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 24.3 F 0.0 Special needs (%): 24.1 3.6 Writing 2.7 Math 2.600: 2.9 8.7 — Writing 2.7 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 2.1 3.0 3.8 6.5 Tests not written (%) 2.9 3.1 2.6 2.1 3.0 — 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 6. level: Reading 3.2 — 2.3 — Math 2.8 3.2 — Math 3.4 5.800: -0.1 2.5 M 0.8 2.7 — Math 2.2 E F 0.9 3.5 M 0.6 — Gr 6 avg.3 3.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 3.4 F 0.6 3.9 Math 3.7 13.0 Gr 6 avg.8 2.800: -0.7 2.0 2.4 5.6 2.9 3.0 Math 3.0 Special needs (%): 23.8 3.1 F 0.8 Math 3.1 M 0.2 3.4 7.9 6.400: 1.6 3.1 5.2 Tests below standard (%) 17.9 3. level: Reading 2.9 3.2 3.7 2.0 32.1 7. inc.2 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 — Writing 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 — Tests not written (%) 0. level: Reading 3.3 F 0.6 — Pleasantville [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.8 — Writing 3.2 E — F 0.9 2.7 2.0 3.0 2.1 F 0.7 2.9 3.9 Math 3. level: Reading 3.7 q Writing 2.7 8.000: 0.9 6.4 29.4 2.7 2.0 2.1 — 2.2 3.5 2.7 2.2 12.6 2.0 — 2.9 — 4.2 F 0. level: Reading 3.0 2.4 Overall rank: 212/2742 58/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Math 3.8 — 8.1 Special needs (%): 2.0 3.0 2.9 — Math 2.6 3.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 35.8 6.9 2.8 3.1 2.6 4.1 M 0.9 2.6 3.0 — Math 3.1 — 30.3 E M 0.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2.0 11.3 p Gr 6 avg.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — 3.1 2.9 — 2.5 2.8 2.2 7.1 — 14.2 — Math 3.3 Tests below standard (%) 34.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 4.5 — M 0.8 2.5 — Writing 2.2 p F 0.7 2.9 2.0 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 7.9 2.8 Overall rank: 714/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 9.2 31.7 2.7 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 17.3 n/a F 0.2 21.4 Special needs (%): 8.7 3.4 2.2 4.5 5.5 2.9 2.9 — Writing 2.0 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 E F 0.6 — Math 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.5 6.8 3.8 2.3 F 0.8 3.8 34.1 — Overall rating out of 10 8.9 — 3.6 2.0 3.8 Writing 3.5 7.9 9.8 2. inc.4 — Pope John Paul II [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 4.0 3.1 18.2 M 0.8 2.7 3.7 E F 0.2 0.2 — Math E M 0. of $71.9 2.8 2.0 3.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 8.1 3.2 3.9 3.0 Special needs (%): 23.9 22.2 29.8 33.9 2. level: Reading 3.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 4.4 20.7 2.3 F 0. of $114. inc.1 — Math M 0.8 2.0 — Math 2.3 6.4 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.4 26.2 — Our Lady of Grace [Catholic] Aurora Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 1.2 F 0.5 2.5 F 0.3 3.5 8.9 2.0 2.7 0. inc.7 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24. of $86.1 F 0.9 6.2 5.4 41.5 Special needs (%): 13.9 — Gr 6 avg. of $132.0 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 8.0 2.3 3.7 — 2.8 2.2 n/a M 0.3 0.800: 1.2 — Math E E M 0.4 3.1 Gr 6 avg.0 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 3.2 p Math F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 11.4 F 0.9 2.2 1. of $77.3 n/a F 0.6 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 5.300: 1. of $92.8 12.3 2.7 2.4 F 0.8 17.9 2.0 2.6 — Writing 2.1 3.9 3.1 M 0.4 3.7 2.9 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.7 0.8 2.9 3.0 0.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 7.5 6.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.0 2.1 27.0 — Gr 6 avg. of $120.9 2. of $152.0 — Writing 2.9 3.3 6.9 2.0 3.4 — E M 0.2 2. inc. level: Reading 2.5 Special needs (%): 13.9 20.2 3.7 2.7 — Math 3.9 2.7 3.0 Math 3.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.0 3.3 2.5 22.0 3.3 M 0.3 3.1 8.7 2.0 3.1 2.1 M 0.9 1.7 — 4.7 5.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 10 8.9 — Math 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 — 2.2 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 8.7 2.2 20.2 23.9 2. inc.5 2.3 2.9 8.2 3.7 — 7.1 F 0.3 2.600: 1.3 Overall rank: 475/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — F 0. inc. level: Reading 3.7 — Math 2.2 3.8 2.1 23.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.3 3.3 M 0.6 20.3 6.1 F 0.3 18.7 — Math 2.6 2.4 E M 0.8 2.6 2.8 2.7 3.0 3.4 6.8 2.0 0.0 2.2 3.7 2.0 0.7 2.2 — Writing 2.7 3.1 17.4 45.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 19. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.9 6.7 2.4 32.3 3.0 9.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 8.3 7.8 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 6.9 2.0 3.7 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.0 22.1 1.7 2.200: 1.0 3.4 2.8 2.2 26.9 2.8 2.0 2.1 3.2 — Poplar Bank [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 13.4 Overall rank: 1499/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.6 Writing 2.4 16.7 2.9 2.0 — Math 3.9 — Math 3.0 3.6 3.9 2.2 7.1 2.1 F 0.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 3.7 2.4 3. inc.4 F 0.9 — Writing 3.8 7.9 2.3 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 F 0.7 35.3 F 0.0 1.9 3. level: Reading 2.3 2.7 2.2 F 0.3 2.1 — Math F 0.4 Overall rank: 902/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — Writing 2.1 — Park Avenue [Public] Holland Landing Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 0.5 3.5 2. of $96.1 Gr 6 avg.0 2.7 — Writing 2.3 4 6.7 3.9 2.1 Tests not written (%) 2.8 3.3 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.2 2.9 2.1 Overall rank: 1777/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 13.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.4 — Our Lady of Hope [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 48 ESL (%): 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.4 23.9 2.8 2. of $134. level: Reading 3.0 2.9 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3.1 — 3.8 — Parkland [Public] Markham ESL (%): 26.0 2.2 3.5 Overall rank: 475/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4 5.8 7.0 2.7 2.900: -1.8 — Writing 3.1 9.0 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.8 2.5 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 3 5.8 2.2 — 2.9 — 2.9 2.2 F 0.9 2.0 2.1 3.300: 1.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 4.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 3.2 F 0.8 8.5 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 42.2 3.0 — 6.3 E M 0.0 — Gr 6 avg. inc.4 17. level: Reading 2.8 Math 3.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.3 8.1 — Our Lady of the Rosary [Catholic] Concord Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 4.1 — E F 0. inc.4 M 0.3 F 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 — 3.7 2.9 6.0 4.4 F 0.3 0.3 0.7 2.2 3.9 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 n/a E n/a Tests below standard (%) 8.0 3.1 — Writing 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 24.0 Special needs (%): 4.5 2.0 1.1 1.1 56.1 F 0.4 F 0.7 2.1 F 0.9 2.2 1.6 — 5.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.100: -1.2 F 0.

2 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.0 3.2 4.8 2.8 3.7 Tests not written (%) 2.7 n/a 3.3 21.2 — Math 2.8 — F 0. level: Reading 2.8 10.5 p 9.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 7.5 3.0 2.8 0.7 2.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.8 2. of $144.4 19.3 3.9 3.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.7 — Math 3.8 2.500: 0.2 3.9 2.1 20.4 6.9 3.2 Overall rating out of 10 8.5 3.1 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.1 E — F 0.2 3.5 24.8 6.3 14.9 2.6 — 6.1 F 0.400: 2.1 — 14.1 F 0.4 2.4 — 2.3 3.1 Math M 0.4 5.5 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 14.4 3. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.0 — F 0.1 Gr 6 avg.9 2.2 — 5.1 3.4 3.3 6.8 — 20.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 3.8 Math 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.1 3. level: Reading 2.2 — 33.2 F 0.2 F 0.0 n/a F 0.9 2.2 — Sainte-Marguerite-Bourgeoys [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.4 — Math E F 0.2 F 0.4 8.4 7.2 3.1 3.4 4.1 8.7 3 4.6 2.5 2.9 3. inc.1 2.1 4.1 F 0.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.3 7.8 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 16.9 — 3.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.8 — 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 14.5 F 0.8 3.2 3.200: 0.9 2.9 4. of $65.8 7.9 2.0 3.8 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 21.8 1.0 — 3.1 13.2 n/a F 0.8 0.1 F 0.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 8.0 2.7 2.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 5. inc.8 2.9 — 3.8 2.1 F 0.1 3.8 — F 0.2 — Writing 3.1 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.6 2. inc.9 Writing 3.700: 0.6 — 6 6.8 2.4 3.3 Math F 0.9 1.1 — 2.9 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.0 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 6.0 3.0 17.9 2.3 0.1 E n/a 30.8 2.1 23. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.8 6.3 — Ramer Wood [Public] Markham ESL (%): 14.2 — Writing 3.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E F 0.2 — Math F 0.4 7.6 15.3 3.2 — F 0.4 38.9 Overall rank: 98/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.2 3.0 0.8 3.4 8.7 2.9 — 2.4 — F 0.9 Math 2. of $82.1 — 2.0 2.0 3.8 — 3.4 3.8 15.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 10.4 Overall rank: 2146/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 M 0.500: 3.4 2.5 — Writing 2.9 3. of $56.6 3.2 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 396/2742 152/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 — 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — 2.3 Special needs (%): 8.5 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 2.9 2.3 q F 0.6 6.0 2.4 M 0. level: Reading 2.8 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 M 0. of $69.1 Gr 6 avg.1 — Math M 0.4 4.0 p Math 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.6 F 0.7 Math 2.7 — Writing 2.4 Writing 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 8.3 3.9 — Math 3.7 3.9 — 5.0 Special needs (%): 21.4 Math 2. level: Reading 3. inc.3 F 0.9 3.9 3.9 n/a 2.0 p 8.2 3.5 q Math F 0.3 17.4 2.3 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.6 — 12.1 3.0 3.9 3.5 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 26.3 2.1 3.9 3.1 F 0.2 E E F 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 22.1 F 0. inc.8 3.5 3.0 Tests not written (%) 8.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 3.6 Writing 2.5 2.2 10.3 — 2.7 — 0.1 n/a 2.0 3.3 — 3.4 3.1 F 0.7 2.3 — Writing 3.9 2.0 — Math 3.1 E E — Math F 0.3 M 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 7.1 3.0 2.0 3.2 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 — Tests not written (%) 9.3 11.1 F 0.9 Writing 2. of $84.3 — Gr 6 avg.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.5 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 10 10 8.6 Overall rating out of 10 7 Rogers [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 3.3 3.1 2.9 3.1 M 0.8 1.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 186/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 9.1 2.4 2.9 — Writing 3.5 7.2 F 0.9 2.7 15.8 2.6 2.2 4.0 Math 3.6 3.2 n/a 8.7 2.0 3.0 3.3 F 0.8 Writing 2. inc.1 3.8 2.5 Math 2.3 — F 0.8 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 19.1 — M 0.8 3.0 p 2.4 3.8 Writing 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 16.6 2.3 8.5 8.0 — F 0. inc.0 3.0 — 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 8.5 3.9 8.8 3.5 2.0 Tests not written (%) 5.2 p 2.1 Tests not written (%) 5. level: Reading 3.9 2.5 3.4 q Tests below standard (%) 45.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 1.8 3.3 — Roy H Crosby [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 24.4 3.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 79 Special needs (%): 7.200: -1.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a 24.1 3.0 3.8 3.9 Writing 2. inc.1 — Tests below standard (%) 17.2 3.3 3.4 M 0.0 2.4 7.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 3.0 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 Writing 3.2 p 2.1 — Writing 2.3 2.5 n/a Rosedale Heights [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 7.1 3.1 3.1 3.9 2.8 — Writing 2.100: 2.5 3.9 3.6 F 0.1 3.0 3.0 3.1 E E p 13.9 55.8 1.3 Math F 0.9 2.9 — F 0.8 — Math 2.1 3.6 2.3 F 0.5 — Writing 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3. level: Reading 3.2 3.1 F 0.0 3.3 3.3 Math M 0.3 F 0.7 1.2 16.6 2. level: Reading 3.5 Overall rank: 186/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.1 — Writing 3.0 18.4 F 0.5 2.2 F 0.9 2. inc.4 14.4 2. of $86.1 7.4 F 0.1 E E F 0.0 — 2.8 Math 3.1 17.1 3.7 n/a 6.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 8.6 Tests not written (%) 9.6 F 0.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 n/a n/a M 0.9 Math 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 — 3.3 — Gr 6 avg.2 n/a Gr 6 avg. inc.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.1 F 0.8 3.3 8.1 46.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 45.9 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.9 3.6 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 32.9 — Math 2.8 2.8 2.0 3.1 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.0 — 2.0 24.5 4.4 14.9 7.1 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.2 2.9 4.1 n/a n/a F 0.3 8.2 2.1 2.1 — .3 6.3 F 0.3 Gr 6 avg.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.9 2.9 2.1 E M 0.2 — 2. inc.4 3.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.0 Tests not written (%) 4.2 Special needs (%): 4.0 — Gr 6 avg.2 — Math 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg. of $124.9 n/a Red Maple [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 23.2 3.2 2.3 — F 0.8 3.7 8.9 n/a 3.7 — 3.1 2.2 3.0 — Math 3.2 3.4 10.2 2.6 Writing 2.6 2.0 3.3 F 0.9 14.2 38.1 3.4 F 0.9 3.9 1.0 31.9 7.0 — Randall [Public] Markham ESL (%): 46.0 12.3 Tests below standard (%) 25.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.5 — Math 3.3 Gr 6 avg.4 2.6 2.8 — Richmond Rose [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 75 ESL (%): 25.1 F 0. of $76.7 2.9 — 6.2 M 0.3 F 0.5 4.8 2.6 — 2.3 3.2 3.4 8.3 11.1 3.0 1.9 2.2 F 0.300: 2.4 7.8 3.2 13.3 2.1 F 0. of $88.0 3.8 5.9 — Math 3.1 M 0.6 43.5 2. inc.9 Math 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2.0 — Saint-Jean [Catholic] Aurora ESL (%): 4.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 6 5.3 p Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.3 3.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Math 2.2 F 0.0 3.9 3.6 2.9 3.900: 2.2 Special needs (%): 4.7 Writing 2.2 — 42.2 — R L Graham [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 0.1 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.300: 2.4 9.3 Tests below standard (%) 30.1 3.2 F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.0 3.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 85 Special needs (%): 9.2 14.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.8 7. inc.2 2.500: 2.3 3.2 — 5.2 3.0 0.3 M 0.5 3.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.0 3.7 26.1 F 0.5 2.6 — Redstone [Public] Richmond Hill ESL (%): 18. of $69.0 0.2 F 0.6 5. level: Reading 2.3 0.5 Gr 6 avg.7 Overall rank: 1/2742 5/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Overall rank: 86/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.3 3.2 3. level: Reading 2.500: 0.0 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.1 23.4 — Reesor Park [Public] Markham ESL (%): 3.800: 1.2 n/a E F 0. of $105.0 15.8 Writing 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 1.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.7 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 3.0 2.0 2.4 18.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 21.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 36.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 — 4.9 7.1 3.9 — 2.0 3.8 2.9 3.2 F 0.300: 2.2 Overall rank: 235/2742 14/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 Overall rank: 261/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — 2.9 3.2 p 2.8 2.1 M 0.0 3.1 — 2.9 7.4 3.1 Math 3.4 M 0.7 2.6 2.7 — 3.0 2. of $65. level: Reading 3.0 0.3 — 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 32.9 5. level: Reading 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 9.2 3.0 2.2 n/a n/a Math M 0.4 6.8 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 — Writing 2.9 Math 2.2 3.8 2.2 — 20.9 2.3 M 0.3 5.0 2.8 2.7 10 10 10 10.7 3.2 M 0.1 F 0.2 n/a 17.3 3. level: Reading 3.1 — Tests below standard (%) 21.1 3.8 — 2.0 — 2.2 F 0.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 8.8 8.2 8 7.0 2. level: Reading 2.4 M 0.2 5.2 3.4 3.8 Special needs (%): 31.8 7.9 3.2 3.0 3.0 — 3.5 Writing 2.0 — 7.4 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.0 15. inc.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 6.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 3.4 2.5 2.8 2.0 2.2 M 0.2 3.8 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 3.9 San Lorenzo Ruiz [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 2.2 3.7 2.1 3.6 Math 2.7 3.8 Tests not written (%) 4.2 F 0.9 4.0 p Regency Acres [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 0.1 — 3.6 3.5 25. of $73.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2. of $140.1 3.5 3.2 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.8 2.84 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Prince of Peace [Catholic] Keswick Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 2.6 M 0.8 — Writing 2.9 2.900: -1.3 Tests below standard (%) 38.5 0.2 6.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.7 q 3.9 n/a 3.2 18.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 M 0.1 3.4 10.2 F 0.7 — Math 2.0 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.3 — Tests below standard (%) 4.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 21.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 24.7 Gr 6 avg.3 Special needs (%): 8.9 3.9 19.1 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 p 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.8 2.5 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 2.7 Math 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 p 8.9 2.8 8.5 3.0 2.

3 6.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 2.9 2.1 2.7 2.1 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.8 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.7 2.0 1.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — St Anne [Catholic] Richmond Hill ESL (%): 0.9 — Writing 2.7 2.8 7.8 Overall rank: 573/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 p Gr 6 avg.8 — Writing 2.1 0.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 17.0 2.0 3.3 3.9 3.9 7.7 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.1 F 0.3 F 0.0 2.1 3.3 2.2 2.9 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 7.8 q Tests not written (%) 4.7 27.7 2. level: Reading 2.6 3. of $112.2 M 0.3 n/a F 0.1 27.8 — Writing 2.8 26.9 5.8 3.2 2.5 Special needs (%): 5.1 — Gr 6 avg.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.9 3.6 2.4 — F 0.1 3.0 — 3.1 14.9 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 18.8 3.9 — Math 3.9 — Math 3.0 — Math 2.9 — Math 3.8 13.6 q Tests not written (%) 5.8 3.500: -0.1 M 0.2 — Math M 0.3 2.1 E F 0.1 — Math 3.9 3.8 2.9 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 11.9 0. inc. of $54.1 2.0 — Math 2.8 — Writing 3.2 Writing 3.0 2.0 — Writing 3.1 M 0.0 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2.5 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 7.8 2. of $107.3 E — Math M 0.6 — Tests not written (%) 8.7 — Writing 2.8 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.4 2.9 2.5 — St Catherine of Siena [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 40 ESL (%): 2.8 3.700: -0.3 25.3 — Tests not written (%) 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 Overall rank: 1215/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Math 2.2 3.6 2.0 2.8 24.9 2.0 2.9 2.9 2.5 6.1 F 0.2 Overall rank: 511/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 12.0 3.6 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 8. of $100.0 Special needs (%): 14.4 7. level: Reading 2.3 16.0 Special needs (%): 9.1 E E p Tests below standard (%) 19.6 0.3 7 7.7 26.4 n/a F 0.0 3.8 2.8 2.0 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 — Writing 2. of $66.1 F 0.8 3.1 E M 0.8 3.5 2.1 F 0.9 — Math 3.0 — 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.900: 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 10.8 — Tests not written (%) 7.100: 1.9 6.3 — Schomberg [Public] Schomberg Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.2 F 0.5 27.1 Math 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.0 3.1 F 0.1 6.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 45. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.4 16.8 2.7 2.5 Overall rank: 2458/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 Tests not written (%) 8.7 3.1 — Math 2.8 — Writing 2.8 3.8 2.7 Overall rank: 360/2742 220/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 — 2.7 3.8 2.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 Overall rank: 1285/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Writing 3.9 2.3 E — Math M 0.4 n/a Math n/a F 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 0. level: Reading 2.0 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.1 2.9 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.2 M 0.0 Writing 3.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.6 16.0 1.8 3.2 3.2 n/a F 0.0 — F 0.6 24.3 — Math E M 0.9 — Math 3.7 2.5 8.0 — 3.7 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.9 9.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 22. of $83.0 3. inc.5 17.9 21.1 8.2 F 0.4 0.8 6.7 24.3 1.7 2.7 2.2 2.2 2.6 — E M 0.0 Special needs (%): 16.9 — Writing 2.6 15.4 0.2 E F 0.9 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 F 0.9 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.900: 0.4 E F 0. of $92.8 2.1 n/a M 0.9 3.5 7.0 2.800: 1.1 7. level: Reading 2.0 Math 3.2 Overall rank: 1087/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.100: 0.8 2.1 — 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 8.6 25.6 0.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.1 1.2 — Tests below standard (%) 19.5 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.8 — Tests not written (%) 11.4 2.0 3.3 2.9 28.8 2.4 2.1 2.3 3.5 2.9 2.2 2. of $84.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 3.8 24.1 Math 3. inc.8 2.4 6.500: 1.1 2.5 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 25.5 17.5 8.0 1.8 Special needs (%): 10.8 2.1 32.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 Writing 3.9 5.5 — Writing 2.0 Overall rank: 1838/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 2.0 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.4 17.9 — 2. inc.7 8.6 3.9 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.3 1.3 0.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 35.8 2.9 3.0 Writing 3.9 2.4 — St Benedict [Catholic] Unionville ESL (%): 8.3 0.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 20.9 2.5 0.9 2.2 3.7 2.6 n/a Sixteenth Avenue [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 29.1 Writing 3.8 2.8 2.8 2.0 Math 3.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 Special needs (%): 14.0 2.1 n/a 23.6 — 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2. of $82.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.7 7 6.3 E F 0.6 F 0.0 29.8 2.1 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.8 8.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 M 0. inc.0 3.7 3.6 2.0 2.5 3.9 2.9 3.0 — Math 3.3 26.2 2.1 3.900: -0. of $51.2 Silver Stream [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 24.3 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 2.0 27.7 5.2 2.1 3.2 26.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.300: 1.1 E F 0.2 n/a F 0.7 2.3 F 0.8 2. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 27.9 — Writing 3.0 Gr 6 avg.7 q Writing 3.4 6.7 — 2. of $91.6 2.4 Special needs (%): 19.1 3.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 5.0 2.0 Writing 3.2 14.9 3.5 8.2 6.8 — Writing 2.3 2.8 2.9 — 2.0 q Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.0 — Sharon [Public] Sharon Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.8 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 23.5 F 0.3 M 0.0 2.8 3.6 2.2 F 0.0 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 10 8.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 3.3 3.1 — 2.1 F 0.0 2. inc.3 3.7 — 8 8.0 2.7 — Writing 3.0 Special needs (%): 19.7 2.9 1.9 8. inc.6 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 330/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 2.8 2.6 — Math 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 8 6.9 2.5 5 6.5 2.0 0.6 3.1 M 0.0 6.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 — 2.6 2.1 2. inc.2 9.7 2.5 — St Agnes of Assisi [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 84 ESL (%): 7.3 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 3.8 3.4 6.9 2.7 2.3 3.600: -2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 F 0.3 18.1 M 0.0 3.7 2.8 F 0.8 3.1 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 11.3 2.1 Math M 0.6 2.7 2.9 20.6 43.4 2.2 4.9 2.5 2.5 Tests not written (%) 1.9 — St Angela Merici [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 1.2 27.8 28.6 2.6 3.9 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.1 E F 0.9 3.0 — Writing 2. inc.1 F 0.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.1 2.0 15.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 16.8 2.0 3.0 Math 3.1 3.9 2.3 Tests not written (%) 16.1 — Math 3.2 2.2 — Math 3.4 6.8 3.6 M 0.5 2.3 3.7 2.1 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 9.9 3.5 3.1 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.6 2.5 Special needs (%): 13.6 12.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 4.7 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 6.8 2.3 q St Brigid [Catholic] Stouffville ESL (%): 0.3 — Tests below standard (%) 8.9 3.5 3.9 2.6 2.9 2.9 2. level: Reading 3.8 — Math 3.8 q Gr 6 avg.5 n/a Math E n/a M 0.6 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3.2 3.1 2.1 F 0.8 — F 0.1 F 0.9 3.5 3.1 13.8 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.9 3.7 2. of $76.5 3.9 2. inc.2 2.9 1.2 n/a F 0.7 2.9 — Gr 6 avg. inc.2 3.6 2.6 1.5 — Tests not written (%) 3.9 3. level: Reading 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 15.1 — 6 7 7.8 2.9 2.2 E E F 0.2 F 0.1 8.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.800: 1.0 Gr 6 avg.300: -1.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 F 0.9 2.1 10.8 2.2 F 0.7 — Writing 2.400: 1.3 3.8 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 2.1 3.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 24.7 — St Bernadette’s [Catholic] Sutton West Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0. of $89.1 25.3 6.9 3.6 Overall rank: 902/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 6. of $87.7 6.8 3.7 6.2 3.9 2.1 E M 0.9 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.9 2.2 F 0.1 7.0 2.8 27. inc.0 2.5 2.9 2.1 n/a 33.7 7.6 7.1 7.4 F 0.5 3.2 F 0.7 2.9 — Math 3.8 18.9 2.9 — Math 2.7 2.1 2.9 3.7 11.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.0 4.0 — 6.7 26.100: 0.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 — 2.0 23.3 8.0 3.3 n/a F 0.0 Math 2.4 3.9 — 2.0 3.5 q St Andrew [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 77 ESL (%): 0.8 2.3 3.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 — 2.1 F 0.8 2.8 2.7 — 3.9 2.0 2.7 2.3 E — Math M 0.8 7.2 — Sir Richard W Scott [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.3 7 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 3. inc.9 3.3 6.1 57.8 19.9 q Writing 3.1 p Math F 0.0 — Writing 3.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 27.7 Overall rating out of 10 9.8 2.7 3.9 25.1 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.9 3.0 Special needs (%): 19.6 2.6 2.3 n/a Silver Pines [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 88 ESL (%): 12. level: Reading 3.0 0.7 Overall rank: 438/2742 58/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 6.3 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.4 F 0.3 Overall rank: 1087/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 8.2 2.8 2.2 7.4 Overall rank: 396/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.8 2.9 3.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 — .9 8.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 85 San Marco [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 0.1 F 0.5 E — 18.0 3.9 — Writing 2.9 26.6 — 0. inc. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2. of $70.9 2.6 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 F 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 3.4 3.7 2.2 F 0.3 — 4.7 2. level: Reading 3. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.7 2.9 2.9 — Math 2.9 — Math 2.0 3.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 — Math 2.7 2.

level: Reading 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 9 8.4 F 0.0 11.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.0 20.2 3. inc.6 2.8 — Writing 2. of $97.700: 3. of $85.9 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.5 — St Jerome [Catholic] Aurora Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 1. of $69.1 E F 0.5 3.8 — 6.9 Math 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2.8 3.0 2.8 q Math 3. level: Reading 2.1 26.0 — F 0.6 Writing 2.7 2.1 2.9 2.9 3.3 F 0.8 q Gr 6 avg.0 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 10.3 E F 0.0 3.0 2.7 3.3 2.2 F 0.2 2.8 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 Overall rank: 45/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 33.8 15.8 2.1 n/a n/a n/a 30.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 8 8 7.1 3.0 3.9 1.4 5.0 — 2.2 F 0.1 F 0.8 2.1 3.1 3.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.1 2.9 3. inc.1 2.8 7. level: Reading 2.5 Math 3.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.2 3.6 9.4 4.3 19.9 3.7 2.1 3.9 2.1 3.4 — .9 6.0 3.1 — Writing 2. of $79. level: Reading 2.9 6.9 3.1 Writing 3.2 F 0.1 29.4 F 0.3 7.9 1.0 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 9.4 21.0 3.9 6.8 Writing 2.9 7.7 3.0 2.0 3.1 — Math E M 0.2 19.8 — Tests not written (%) 1.4 F 0. inc.2 M 0.0 15.5 Math 2.1 E M 0.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.8 14.4 F 0.1 3.0 2.9 3.8 — Writing 3.0 2.5 6.5 Tests not written (%) 7.700: 0.0 3.7 3.8 18.1 — Writing 3.7 2.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 7.7 Tests not written (%) 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 2.3 2.3 5.7 — Math 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 5. level: Reading 3.4 3.1 — 32. inc.8 2.8 2.2 F 0.9 — 2.8 — Math 3.7 2.5 F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — 0.8 q 2.1 Overall rank: 78/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 5.9 Special needs (%): 20.2 6.4 1.8 26.5 2.8 Writing 2.1 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.1 E p E F 0.8 — Writing 2.0 5.5 2.9 23.2 — Tests below standard (%) 28.2 F 0.6 — Writing 2.7 2.9 2.2 Math M 0.7 — F 0.0 10.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 3.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 Math 2.8 Writing 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.8 — Writing 3.0 2.9 2.3 3.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.2 F 0.9 q 3.9 Writing 3.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 2.0 3.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.2 — 30.1 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — 0.9 Gr 6 avg.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.0 3.0 2.9 — Writing 3.1 n/a F 0.2 3.8 2.9 2.4 24.4 7.0 2.5 3.2 E F 0.5 1.0 3.0 0.7 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 7.7 8.1 3.8 0.7 16.5 8.9 p 2.6 2.9 2.7 3.9 3.8 2.9 6.6 18.2 F 0.3 17.9 2.7 — 3.1 2.7 2.7 q 2.7 3.8 3.3 — 5. level: Reading 3.0 Special needs (%): 5.5 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2.0 3.3 E F 0.2 F 0.0 3. inc.000: -0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 q 3.4 — St Clare [Catholic] Woodbridge ESL (%): 0.5 10.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 13.4 9.8 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 Writing 3.9 Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.0 2.6 q F 0.2 9.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 5. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 17.5 8.6 2.5 2.8 3.2 q St Gregory the Great [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 80 ESL (%): 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.5 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 38.8 27.8 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 85 Special needs (%): 12.9 3.2 — Tests not written (%) 8.1 3.6 2.7 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.800: 0.3 3.2 F 0.300: 3.0 1.9 — Math 3.1 5.8 3. inc.6 2.600: 1.1 F 0.7 3.0 28.4 2.8 — F 0.2 F 0.6 2.9 — 2.7 3.9 — St John Chrysostom [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 2.3 3.8 3.2 M 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.6 8.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 7. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 2.9 2.0 3.1 2.8 — Writing 2.9 Tests not written (%) 6.9 2.6 3.5 18.0 2.1 18. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.8 p St Gabriel the Archangel [Catholic] WoodbridgeGr 6 enrollment: 52 ESL (%): 5.3 7.9 — Overall rating out of 10 8.9 2.2 E F 0.4 7.2 F 0.1 2. inc.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 F 0.8 2.9 3.0 3.8 Writing 2.9 3.9 2. level: Reading n/a 2.7 2.2 3.0 2.2 0.1 3.7 2.1 p St Clement [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.3 p Gr 6 avg. of $70.0 n/a St David [Catholic] Maple ESL (%): 1.4 7.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.4 — Tests below standard (%) 17.7 2.5 — F 0.1 — Math E F 0.2 2.6 0.7 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.1 3.2 3.7 3.0 3.0 Special needs (%): 18.9 3.900: 2.9 2.3 — St Edward [Catholic] Markham ESL (%): 0.2 21.6 Overall rank: 787/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.4 11.5 Overall rank: 1991/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.0 p 3.1 3.0 2.0 q 3.0 3.3 Overall rank: 1886/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.1 E E — Tests below standard (%) 13.1 15.3 F 0.9 2.9 — Math 3. level: Reading 3.8 — Math 2.0 3.7 2.1 — 23.1 — Writing 2.5 F 0.8 6.8 3.0 3.6 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.1 27.6 — Writing 2.9 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 37.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.6 35.5 5.9 — Writing 2.9 3.2 2.8 3.9 2. level: Reading 3.7 Overall rank: 573/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 21.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2. inc.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 F 0.3 3.7 Gr 6 avg.9 3.1 — 7.1 8.7 1.3 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.8 2.0 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 23.3 F 0.1 3.1 F 0.2 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.1 3.4 10.8 — 6.6 2. of $106.0 3.8 8.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 1.5 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.4 — Tests below standard (%) 15.9 3.5 Special needs (%): 24.2 3.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.0 — Math 2.1 5.8 2.7 — 3. level: Reading 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 3.2 F 0.9 — 2. of $76.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 714/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 27.8 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.3 F 0.8 2.5 F 0.9 2.5 2.9 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.7 8.8 2.8 2.2 7.7 2.0 2.7 3.9 2.9 2.9 2.1 — Math E M 0.0 2.86 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Charles Garnier [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 19.3 E — F 0.5 24.2 2.8 2.0 3. of $143. of $107.1 — Math 2.8 2.0 — St Elizabeth Seton [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 2.5 2.9 7.3 — Math 2.7 2.4 6 6.8 — 2.1 E F 0.7 2.8 3.9 3.1 3.4 Special needs (%): 11.4 3.0 25.2 3.2 7.0 2.2 p 2.4 8.6 2.7 6.9 7.2 2.9 2.0 2. level: Reading n/a 2.1 n/a E n/a F 0.7 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.600: 0.4 — Math E F 0.800: 0.3 F 0.0 9.9 — Math 2.5 2.8 2.4 Math F 0.3 3. of $98.0 2.9 2.2 n/a M 0.0 3.6 7.9 n/a Math n/a 2. level: Reading 3.6 — 2. inc.9 2.8 3.0 3.0 q Math 3.300: 1.5 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.6 25.2 F 0.4 3.9 Special needs (%): 17.4 q Gr 6 enrollment: 74 Special needs (%): 10.0 3.0 Math 3.5 q 5.1 2.1 M 0.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.3 Tests not written (%) 4.8 Special needs (%): 11.4 — Writing 2.7 — 2.3 3.8 3.0 2.8 1.2 n/a n/a n/a M 0.4 8.3 Tests below standard (%) 24.6 q Tests not written (%) 7.6 2.8 2.4 17.7 3.8 2.4 1.0 3.0 2.1 M 0.1 p 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 28.4 8.9 2.2 3.0 2.3 E F 0.6 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 40.8 — Writing 2.1 M 0.2 Special needs (%): 10.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 3.7 8.0 Math 3.9 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.5 — St John Bosco [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 1.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.5 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.8 14.8 Math 2.9 2.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 89 Special needs (%): 12.8 p 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — Writing 2.2 F 0.1 — St Francis of Assisi [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.1 3.9 2.1 p 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 7. of $82.1 3.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.7 — 2.9 — 4.9 2.7 3.3 2. of $91.7 2.8 2.2 — E M 0.9 — Math 2.6 18.700: 0.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.2 — Math 2.9 2.8 — Overall rating out of 10 6 6.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.9 3.0 3.8 2.9 3.5 8 6.9 2.4 — St Francis Xavier [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 4.5 21.4 0.4 32.2 3.0 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.2 p Math 2.0 2.3 E E F 0.5 F 0.9 3.4 1.6 34.6 24.2 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 — Math 3.8 q Writing 3.7 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 — Tests below standard (%) 20.9 2.7 2.7 — Writing 2.2 Math F 0.3 — 9.5 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 25.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 — Math F 0.0 3.8 25.3 — 6.9 3.0 2.5 1.1 F 0.0 2. inc.8 Math 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 Overall rank: 623/2742 409/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.3 — F 0.4 7.9 p 2.0 4.5 2.9 23.6 2.8 3.2 2. level: Reading 2.2 3.3 23.8 St Emily [Catholic] Woodbridge ESL (%): 0.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 10.8 2.800: 0. level: Reading 3.5 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 2.3 3.1 — Math 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 26.1 M 0.3 F 0.1 — 2. level: Reading 3.1 3.2 25.2 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 6.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.8 2.7 5.8 Overall rank: 1087/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.6 2. of $58.4 3.0 2.0 3.1 Math M 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 9. inc.3 Overall rank: 1156/2742 194/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.6 — Gr 6 avg.7 3.2 F 0.0 3.000: -1.6 — 7. level: Reading 2.1 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.9 3.8 2.3 F 0.5 — Gr 6 avg.1 3. of $58.0 — Tests not written (%) 9.8 3.5 — Writing 3.9 2.0 26.9 2.7 2.3 E F 0.7 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.7 10.4 7.3 3.3 7.1 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.100: -1.8 0.7 6.1 3. level: Reading 3.2 3.9 2.4 — Math M 0.2 3.3 9. inc.7 Overall rank: 843/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.7 Gr 6 avg.0 — Math 3. of $95. inc.8 — Math 3.2 3.9 2.1 2.2 3.9 Math 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 152/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 6. inc.6 2.7 3.1 3.2 M 0.1 2.2 M 0.8 3.7 2.9 9.9 1.5 3.8 2.2 F 0.0 2.2 2.700: -0.3 2.8 3.9 2.0 17.1 2. level: Reading 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 10 St James [Catholic] Maple ESL (%): 2.7 8.1 2.5 3.9 — 2.9 4.1 2.9 30.2 n/a Math F 0.8 Math 2.8 1.5 Writing 2.

0 2.0 3.3 n/a F 0.5 2. of $102.7 28. level: Reading 2.8 Math 2.8 3.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.2 7.9 2.9 2.1 Overall rank: 714/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.0 3.1 6.8 — Math 3.0 3.4 2.6 6.8 Special needs (%): 26.0 3.5 — F 0.1 — Math M 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 10.9 2.6 2.7 — 3.7 Overall rank: 623/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.5 2.9 2.3 M 0.7 — 3.8 2.0 3.1 3.9 3.7 2. inc.3 F 0.1 Math F 0.8 0.0 2.5 F 0.8 31.1 — Math 2.9 2.3 6.2 M 0.9 2.3 M 0.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0. inc.0 2.8 Special needs (%): 18.0 — 8.1 2.2 1.6 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 n/a Writing n/a 3.5 2.8 2.9 — Writing 2.2 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 9.7 19.1 3.1 F 0.1 2.0 20. inc.0 2.9 3.1 — 8.6 29.6 7.0 3.5 18.9 2.8 2.1 M 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 18.2 3.6 Writing 2.9 46.9 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.1 — St Julia Billiart [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 6.8 2.5 2.8 — St Nicholas [Catholic] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 3.3 3.0 Special needs (%): 15.1 F 0. inc.0 2.2 4.6 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.8 22.8 3.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 3.0 3.0 — Writing 2.8 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 8.5 2.4 26.0 2.1 3.0 0.0 3.8 2.0 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.300: 0.1 7.0 2.3 — 3.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 M 0.3 1.8 2.7 — 3.1 n/a Math F 0.0 2.0 — Math 2.7 8.0 2.9 — Math 2.8 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.4 19.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.5 F 0.9 2.3 3.9 2.2 F 0.7 — Writing 3.8 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 517/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.0 3.3 3.8 13.7 2.4 F 0. of $99.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 20.3 35.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 — 6.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 15.1 2.8 Math 2.9 2.3 6.0 — 2.9 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 24.9 2.7 2.7 3.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.6 Overall rank: 843/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E F 0.0 3.7 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 16.9 — Math 2.1 2.3 3.1 3.1 3.3 — 2.4 6.3 M 0.1 3.6 2.0 3. of $87.0 3.8 q Math 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 1.8 2.0 1.2 — Math M 0. level: Reading n/a 2. level: Reading 3.9 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3. level: Reading 2. of $105.1 25.5 — Writing 3.7 18.8 q 3.2 17.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.1 3.1 F 0.3 — F 0.0 3.1 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 10. level: Reading n/a 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 4.0 2.4 0.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 7.0 2.400: 0.3 q Tests below standard (%) 32.8 2. of $109.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a E E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 Writing 3.4 12.8 2.2 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 q Math 3.4 7.4 — F 0.6 2.1 2.2 F 0.5 5.9 2.8 — Writing 2.2 F 0.6 3.7 Special needs (%): 13.2 — 3.5 3.7 2.2 3.9 2.9 2.6 Special needs (%): 17.3 3.1 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 F 0.0 3.3 M 0.3 6.9 3.2 Math 3.8 2.7 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.2 10.2 3.9 2.9 3.600: -2.8 2.4 — Math 3.8 3.4 20.300: -0.0 Special needs (%): 15.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy St Joseph [Catholic] Aurora ESL (%): 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.3 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 3.4 3.5 — Tests below standard (%) 36.0 — 3.3 F 0.9 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.8 q 3.3 5.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 — St Joseph The Worker [Catholic] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 1.4 3. of $103.9 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 3.2 3.2 7.3 Overall rank: 25/2742 1/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 3.4 F 0.2 F 0.7 Math 3.0 q Writing 3.3 8.2 F 0.9 3.6 q Tests not written (%) 0.9 2.2 — 2.1 28.0 3.8 27.2 n/a F 0.6 18.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.8 3.0 3.6 20.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — St Joseph [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 2.0 — Math 3.0 p Writing 2.1 2.6 3.9 q Gr 6 avg.2 n/a M 0.2 — Tests below standard (%) 3.4 9.9 3.0 q 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 3.1 — E F 0.9 2.1 F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 16.5 26.6 3.9 Math 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7 5.9 — 1.5 — 2.8 2.1 — Math M 0.5 2. level: Reading n/a 2.6 4.7 2.8 2.8 — F 0.5 F 0. of $213.0 Gr 6 avg.2 1.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 21.7 23.7 — .9 2.4 1. of $143.1 3.0 2.9 2.6 7.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.9 3.9 Writing 3.9 — 2.5 — F 0.4 3.7 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 31. level: Reading 3.0 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 22.8 2.5 3.2 F 0.2 F 0.1 9.9 8.2 Math F 0.7 Writing 2. of $213. level: Reading 2.2 F 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 3.2 6.5 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 F 0.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 5.2 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.2 0.7 2.8 2.5 n/a n/a 8. level: Reading 2.7 6.9 2.5 — 2.5 26.0 14.3 F 0.6 2.1 Overall rank: 964/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.1 q Gr 6 avg.8 — Tests not written (%) 6.8 3.5 3.1 — Math F 0.0 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 8.5 F 0.9 — 3.9 2.0 3.5 7.9 n/a Math n/a 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 15.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.3 5.900: 0.0 — Writing 2.0 Math 3.9 3.3 Special needs (%): 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.6 16.9 2.4 3.0 0.9 11.0 2.3 3.6 — 8 8.7 5. level: Reading n/a 2.1 F 0.4 3.2 M 0.9 2. inc.1 M 0.2 9.7 2.0 3. level: Reading 3. of $114.6 3.8 — St Mary Immaculate [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 7.2 n/a n/a M 0.3 11.1 6.8 2.4 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 3.4 — 18.5 — St Monica [Catholic] Buttonville ESL (%): 6.5 Special needs (%): 9.3 2.0 3.4 F 0.8 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.4 6.1 F 0.3 3.3 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2. inc.9 3.9 2.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.0 n/a St Mary [Catholic] Nobleton ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 56 Special needs (%): 3.2 — 2.3 — 20.600: 4.8 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 3.0 — Math 2.7 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1087/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.2 3.6 3. of $95.700: -1.8 2.1 — St Marguerite D’Youville [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 0.2 2.2 F 0.8 — 3.1 n/a n/a F 0.8 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.1 E F 0.7 2.500: -5.7 q Writing 3.7 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.8 2.8 0.9 Writing 2.8 2.8 2.6 — Math F 0.5 — 2.7 Writing 3.9 3.1 7.8 q Writing 3.8 — Writing 2.1 2.3 M 0.3 E E E — E F 0.0 24.7 2. inc.800: 2.4 3.5 — St Joseph [Catholic] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 10.2 F 0.8 2.2 3.6 3. level: Reading 2.6 — Math E M 0.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 2.1 M 0.8 2.9 Writing 2.9 q F 0.1 3.200: 1.3 — 3.1 F 0.0 q Gr 6 avg.0 q Math 3.1 F 0.7 35.0 2.7 3.0 17.9 3.8 2.6 8.8 Gr 6 avg.6 Gr 6 avg.3 n/a St Michael [Catholic] Thornhill ESL (%): 8.5 2.9 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 M 0.2 3.9 3.9 2. inc.7 Math 2.8 — 2.5 3.4 — 3.8 2. level: Reading 3.0 2.5 6. level: Reading 3.2 M 0.1 n/a 12.9 18.5 3.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Overall rank: 1/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 8.7 18.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.7 Overall rank: 511/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 0.2 F 0.4 E — Tests below standard (%) 19.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 22.200: 3.5 7.2 Math F 0.1 M 0.8 2.3 Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 — 8.1 M 0.4 2.6 23.1 E F 0.8 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.4 3.6 10.7 — 3.3 7.7 — 2.4 6.4 3.7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 1.5 Overall rank: 330/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.4 q 2.4 6.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 Writing 3.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.9 — St Margaret Mary [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 45 ESL (%): 0.0 3.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 33/2742 152/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.1 2.8 2.9 2.7 Writing 2.6 2.0 0.7 2.9 3.8 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 26.1 — 7.2 — 15.8 2.3 6.2 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 6. inc. level: Reading 2.5 16.1 2.0 2.0 — Gr 6 avg. of $93.1 — 3.9 2.9 8.0 Tests not written (%) 2.0 5.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.7 Math 2.1 M 0.7 — 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 M 0.300: 0.9 3.7 7.1 — Tests not written (%) 25.3 3.300: 2.3 Gr 6 avg.2 3.1 3.5 7. level: Reading 2.0 2.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.4 3.7 2.3 3.6 3.7 Special needs (%): 6.9 Gr 6 avg.2 2.1 F 0.6 F 0. level: Reading 2.5 F 0.5 2.9 — Math 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 3.9 — Writing 2. inc.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.0 2.2 8. level: Reading 2.1 Overall rank: 902/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.2 F 0.9 2.7 3.7 7.9 2.8 3.7 9 8.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 10 10 9.7 2.3 n/a Math n/a 2. of $72.8 2.3 E M 0.0 — St Mark [Catholic] Stouffville ESL (%): 0.900: 0.5 13.0 3.1 M 0.2 3.6 7.2 3.8 Writing 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.4 38.8 Math 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 3.1 3.8 Writing 2.7 Math 2.0 Gr 6 avg.7 6.0 2.6 2.9 3.9 2.6 7.6 14.3 F 0.2 7.6 30.1 Tests below standard (%) 18.0 Tests not written (%) 7.7 2.0 2.6 17.8 8.7 F 0.9 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 F 0.2 — 3. inc. of $68.6 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.2 F 0.1 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 3.9 8.5 — 3.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 28.9 3.3 5. inc.0 0.0 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 15. of $99.6 Tests not written (%) 6. inc.5 7.4 6.2 87 Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 6. level: Reading 2.4 3.0 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 Tests not written (%) 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.9 5.6 2.4 31.1 3.9 2.4 19.7 — St Justin Martyr [Catholic] Unionville Gr 6 enrollment: 87 ESL (%): 2.0 0.0 4.6 3.1 — 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.0 — 10.8 7.4 17.000: 1.0 6.8 — 2.3 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 34/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 0.1 F 0.5 — 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 — Writing 3.9 3. inc.2 3.9 2.2 3.4 13.9 — Writing 2. inc. level: Reading 3.6 2.2 Math F 0.1 Math 3.0 — 2.9 3.0 Math 3.2 3.6 Writing 2.1 F 0.1 2.0 3.8 — St Matthew [Catholic] Unionville ESL (%): 4.2 3.7 2.3 — F 0.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.6 3.6 7.9 — Math 2.6 2.

1 18.7 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 10.3 — 0.0 4.0 2.4 3.0 3.8 Math 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 3.0 — Writing 2.1 3.8 2.8 2.1 F 0.0 1.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 2.2 3.9 2.7 2.9 Writing 3.2 n/a M 0.5 6.0 1.0 1.7 6.6 3.9 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — Stonehaven [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 8.7 Writing 2. inc.9 — 2.3 2.9 3.8 2.0 2.4 n/a M 0.8 2.8 — 2.5 F 0.9 3.1 p Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 2.8 Tests not written (%) 0.1 F 0.8 2.2 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 F 0.1 2.7 4.6 2.8 3.6 Writing 2.0 2.3 E n/a F 0.2 — 3. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 3.0 0.8 — 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.9 — 2.0 q 3.8 2.6 9.4 — St Patrick [Catholic] Markham ESL (%): 4.9 2.9 28.2 6.8 3.9 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.9 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1677/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.5 6.5 Math 2.8 34.9 2.2 M 0.1 16.8 2.8 — Math 2.7 44.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 53/2742 28/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.8 4.3 2.4 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 4.4 — F 0. of $108.6 — 15.800: 3.7 2.1 Overall rank: 45/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 n/a n/a F 0.4 9.7 2.2 6.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 295/2742 46/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.1 2.500: 0.6 — Tests not written (%) 11.9 2.6 3.0 Gr 6 avg.7 Math 2.1 2.7 8.1 F 0.1 Math 3.7 2.5 3.8 6.6 22.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 Math 3.7 3.7 2.0 25.8 2.6 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2. inc.2 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8 4.4 3.0 2.9 Gr 6 avg.4 — F 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 37.3 8.8 3.3 6.5 2. of $83.2 3.0 3.1 — Writing 2.8 2.0 2.3 — 8.9 8.6 3.4 5.9 2.7 3.8 3.6 Writing 2.5 q 3.7 2.3 5.0 — M 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 n/a Tests below standard (%) 27.2 3. inc.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.900: -1.8 2. level: Reading 3.3 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.8 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.7 2.2 E — Tests below standard (%) 25.0 3.8 — 2.7 2.4 — 1.6 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 18 Special needs (%): 5.7 2.2 — St Thomas Aquinas [Catholic] Keswick Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.7 2.1 Writing 3.4 3.5 23. level: Reading 2.6 2.1 — 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 2.5 25. inc.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 18.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 n/a St Rene Goupil-St Luke [Catholic] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 26.7 3.1 7.0 2.1 2.700: 2.2 3.7 — St Paul [Catholic] Newmarket ESL (%): 13.0 — 3.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 21.7 2.1 M 0.9 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 — St Veronica [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — 15.0 2.5 22.4 14.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 10.5 24.7 2.2 3.8 11.5 5. of $84.0 3.0 2.8 3.7 — 2.7 2.8 36.1 2.2 2. level: Reading 2.1 14.2 3.8 2.88 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Padre Pio [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 54 ESL (%): 1.6 q n/a n/a M 0.2 3.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 10 10 10 9.7 8.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 25. of $72.3 F 0.8 — 2.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a E n/a E E n/a Math n/a M 0.4 0.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.0 2.9 — 2.9 9.6 3. level: Reading 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.0 2. of $79.2 n/a Math n/a 3.8 — 3.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 41.1 4.3 2.9 5.7 2.2 E F 0.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 1. level: Reading 3.1 3. level: Reading 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 9.6 Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.3 3.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.7 — 3. level: Reading n/a 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 9.7 — 2.9 2.8 2.7 Math 3.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.6 1.2 Gr 6 avg.0 — Math 2.7 2.2 — 3.200: -1.5 — 3.6 10 8.8 3.6 — Math 2.9 2.1 2.2 Math M 0.1 F 0.1 — 3.2 F 0.8 Writing 2.2 — 2.9 Writing 3.6 — Writing 2.1 — 2.7 — 2.4 3.9 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 30.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 40.1 3.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 30.0 — 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 9.0 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 2.9 — St Vincent de Paul [Catholic] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 10.6 — Writing 2.3 12.0 1.7 — St Peter [Catholic] Woodbridge ESL (%): 4.5 12.8 3.9 1.8 Writing 2.9 — 3.7 — 3.9 Writing 2.4 — F 0.8 — .7 2.3 — 6.9 2.2 6. of $68.500: 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.7 — Sutton [Public] Sutton West ESL (%): 0.1 3.3 3.1 — Math 2.1 F 0.5 2. inc.2 M 0.2 4.0 — 3.1 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 F 0.000: 2.0 4.7 7.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 16.9 — 2.0 2.9 2.6 2.1 3.1 3.8 3.0 48.7 5.8 — 2.4 — St Patrick [Catholic] Schomberg ESL (%): 5.3 0.1 Math 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 9.2 8.3 6 6.2 18.7 2.8 2.8 — 2.7 2.8 3.8 2.0 — 6.2 2.3 E — E E M 0.4 — 8.1 n/a F 0.5 Math 3.4 2. of $91.2 p Math 2.2 1.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 8.0 2.2 3.0 3. level: Reading 2.8 — Stonebridge [Public] Markham ESL (%): 35. level: Reading 2.2 3.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.9 2.7 0.4 Overall rating out of 10 9.6 3.0 Special needs (%): 6.0 2.1 F 0.7 — Math 2.1 F 0.2 — 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 152/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3.9 17.9 2.6 Special needs (%): 11.5 Writing 2.0 3.2 — F 0.2 3.3 — 3.6 2.6 2.1 2.1 F 0.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.2 7.1 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.9 — Writing 2.7 2.2 38.8 3.5 Tests not written (%) 4.9 2.6 2.4 — Math F 0.7 16.9 3.3 2.1 46.5 2.4 Math 3.4 8.2 3.8 5.5 2.6 2.3 n/a n/a 48.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Tests not written (%) 5.4 — 2.5 13.8 7.7 2.9 2.3 Special needs (%): 10.0 2.3 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 35.0 2.0 2.9 Math 3.5 n/a F 0.5 3.2 p 3.1 Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.0 30. inc.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 3.0 — 3.8 — 2.7 3.9 2.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.6 2.2 3.9 3.4 0.0 2. inc.4 n/a F 0.600: 0.7 7.6 q Writing 3.9 2.3 3.9 42.5 7. inc.0 — 4.9 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.8 8.9 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 3.5 2.8 8.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 37.2 — 6.1 Writing 3.8 — 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 20.0 Writing 2.9 7.6 2.8 — 5.2 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 2.5 q Math 3.2 F 0.2 2.4 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.6 3.8 2.4 n/a M 0.6 35.9 — 3.8 3.1 — 3.6 2.9 2.100: -0.1 F 0.8 F 0.1 3. of $153.9 3.5 Overall rating out of 10 8 Gr 6 enrollment: 22 Special needs (%): 18.9 Math 3.3 — 5.6 2.0 2.5 16.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 Tests not written (%) 1. of $91.8 2.8 Gr 6 avg.9 Special needs (%): 9.3 7.2 Math F 0.6 q 40.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.1 Math 3.8 3.6 3.9 Math 2.200: 1.5 1. of $82.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.1 n/a n/a 18.7 Tests not written (%) 13. of $91.6 10.9 5.8 2.9 2.4 3.0 n/a Summitview [Public] Stouffville ESL (%): 0.4 q 2.8 2.1 3. level: Reading 3.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 9.0 3.5 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 43 Special needs (%): 4.8 3.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.900: 0.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 Writing 3.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 n/a Math E M 0.3 35.1 19. level: Reading 2.9 — F 0.1 Overall rank: 1610/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — 3.1 — 2.1 7.2 — 14.2 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.7 — Writing 2.7 E n/a 20.9 2.8 2.9 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.6 5.7 Math 2.0 36.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.0 Tests not written (%) 5.9 Special needs (%): 15.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 3.0 p 8 6.6 n/a E n/a n/a F 0.3 F 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 3.2 Overall rank: 166/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Stuart Scott [Public] Newmarket ESL (%): 14.4 2.0 0.7 2.8 8.300: 0.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 68 Special needs (%): 10.2 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a Math n/a 3.7 2.7 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.1 n/a 10.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 3.2 3.7 — Math 3.8 2.4 — 2.5 4.5 3.0 3.2 2.4 2.9 Tests not written (%) 4.8 18.7 9.5 2.9 3.6 8.1 n/a M 0.2 3.1 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 3.7 3.4 Tests below standard (%) 30.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 — 2.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.9 2.6 4.7 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 220/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $96.1 2.8 2.6 12.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.3 3.9 3.2 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 73 Special needs (%): 20.4 11.2 13.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 2.100: 3.8 2.4 3.0 3.4 26.000: -1.1 2.3 3. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.0 29.0 3.9 2.9 3.2 3.0 Special needs (%): 33.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.7 2.9 5. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.7 4.0 2.7 8.4 — 3.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.0 — 10.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.7 Writing 2.1 — F 0.2 — M 0.2 — 8. inc.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 3.1 E M 0.8 2. of $49.1 M 0.1 — 3.1 F 0.7 2.5 2.9 — 3. of $82.7 2.5 Gr 6 avg.4 2.6 2.1 9.3 27.2 3.4 2.3 6.0 8.4 4.9 20.1 1.5 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 13.1 Math M 0.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 5.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 964/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 Math 3.6 7. inc.6 2.9 2.8 Writing 2.7 2.400: 1. of $68.2 3.2 3.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.7 2.3 — E F 0.9 3.2 2.7 Math 2.0 2.1 n/a F 0.7 2.0 Gr 6 avg.6 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 — 8.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Writing 3.7 Tests not written (%) 23. inc.4 Tests not written (%) 14.1 — Math F 0.4 2.8 3.2 6.1 3.0 Math 3.1 — St Stephen [Catholic] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 63 ESL (%): 1.6 2.1 25.8 2.1 F 0.7 — M 0.2 — Writing 3.1 M 0.5 2.9 2.5 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 6.0 3. inc.8 2.6 42. level: Reading 2.4 2. inc.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.0 3.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 0.4 3.2 F 0.7 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.5 2.6 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.

1 M 0.9 Trillium Woods [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 53 ESL (%): 20.6 3. level: Reading 2.1 Tests not written (%) 13.0 — 2.2 3. inc.0 2.4 7.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 3.6 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 F 0.3 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 2.1 1.9 27.3 F 0.3 Overall rank: 1777/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — 7.2 3.7 1. inc.2 E p Math F 0.1 — E F 0.0 — 8.0 — Writing 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 Math 2.1 3.7 6.3 — Writing 2. inc.1 3.9 3.5 F 0.0 14.6 8 7.0 3.7 4.1 F 0.9 19.3 — Math M 0.7 3.0 2.0 7.000: 1.1 p Tests below standard (%) 27.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.2 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 12. of $435.7 3. level: Reading 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.6 2.2 F 0.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 17.3 F 0.3 q F 0.3 6.4 19.4 3.5 2.7 — Math 2.1 2.7 Writing 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 43. inc.2 41.6 2.0 24.4 Tests below standard (%) 34. inc.8 3.8 — Math 2.9 2.6 5.2 F 0.7 3.1 3.3 — Tests below standard (%) 23.6 2. inc.3 26.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 194/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 E E — Tests below standard (%) 44.1 n/a n/a n/a 23.3 7. level: Reading 2.8 Math 2. level: Reading 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a 3.8 2.0 2.3 3.9 2.4 10.8 2.0 3.8 — M 0.8 Vellore Woods [Public] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 66 ESL (%): 43.3 E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 F 0.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 19.4 11.1 3.200: 1.6 — Walter Scott [Public] Richmond Hill Gr 6 enrollment: 65 ESL (%): 35.1 7.5 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 41. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2.6 3.9 2.5 7.1 Tests not written (%) 9.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.1 4.8 Math 2.3 n/a n/a Math M 0.8 3.9 3.8 — 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 7.8 2.2 2.7 2.3 Overall rank: 787/2742 997/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.2 8.5 22.5 — 2.1 — Writing 3.9 2.9 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 3.9 2.9 — Writing 3.8 2.7 3. level: Reading n/a 2.0 — 3.0 7.2 F 0.8 — 2.9 Writing 3.0 3.0 2.5 5.9 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.4 5.7 2.8 2.4 2.8 — Math 2.4 F 0.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 23.6 7.1 2.4 — Wells Street [Public] Aurora ESL (%): 0.8 3.9 — 8.1 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 — 2.9 3.1 1.3 1.2 3. inc. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.3 Wilclay [Public] Markham ESL (%): 36.8 7.8 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.3 F 0.600: 0.200: 1.7 2.3 M 0.0 3.1 8.0 — 3.8 3.2 3.9 — Math 3.3 Tests not written (%) 5.0 — Math 2.5 2.9 3.5 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.2 7.0 3.9 7.1 — Tests below standard (%) 34.5 2.9 3.1 2.2 — 3.200: 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 2.2 F 0.7 Math 2.8 Writing 2.9 2.7 2.7 9. of $76.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.7 2.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 10.7 — Math 2.5 Special needs (%): 14.0 2.1 2.8 2.9 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.1 4.0 2.6 7.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.9 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.5 2.8 2.0 3.8 3.7 2.2 M 0.8 2.3 13.5 2.1 6.1 Tests below standard (%) 29.8 3.2 F 0.1 3.2 7. inc.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 — M 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 M 0. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.1 13.7 28.2 — 2.8 2.8 — Writing 2.3 4.1 E M 0.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.7 — Math 2.4 2.1 2.0 3.9 3.7 — Thornhill Woods [Public] Thornhill Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 16.0 2.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 3.7 8.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.1 3.3 E F 0.0 — 2.9 35.1 — Gr 6 avg.3 3.3 q 10.6 2.9 2.0 — Math 3.8 3.5 5.3 Overall rank: 1357/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 3.4 7 8.2 M 0. of $104.0 3.0 — Math 3.7 — Writing 3.2 8.8 2.4 n/a Unionville Meadows [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 24.0 — 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 17 Special needs (%): 17.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 3.1 2. level: Reading 2.8 Special needs (%): 13.9 6.9 2.2 28.9 3. level: Reading 3.200: 1.1 E n/a Math n/a M 0.7 Overall rank: 573/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.1 3. of $115.5 Math 2.7 2.6 0.8 3.8 2.4 Special needs (%): 10.4 — 6.2 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $89.7 42.5 2.9 39.7 2.0 3.7 2.3 7.6 18. inc.0 n/a Math n/a 2.7 6.3 Special needs (%): 6.8 2.1 E M 0.5 2.9 2.900: -1.8 2. inc.8 3.8 Writing 2.7 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 14.3 2.0 Gr 6 avg.8 9.0 2.1 3.1 Overall rank: 360/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.0 2.0 Overall rank: 475/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.5 — 2.9 2.9 3.8 2.3 26.5 2.4 — Math F 0.9 3.6 — Writing 2.9 — 4.500: 1.7 Writing 2.9 3.9 2. of $103.1 1.6 — 3.9 2.3 F 0.2 M 0.7 2.7 2.1 2.8 3.1 n/a n/a M 0.9 3.9 — Writing 2.8 19.0 2.3 E F 0.1 F 0.5 9.6 19.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.200: 1.8 3.7 2.9 24.3 n/a W J Watson [Public] Keswick ESL (%): 0.5 2.2 13.1 — F 0.3 7.1 — 2.5 44.8 2.4 2.3 2.7 2.0 3.1 p Math 2.1 16.0 — 2. level: Reading 2.4 n/a Unionville [Public] Unionville Gr 6 enrollment: 41 ESL (%): 2.2 q 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.2 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — 2.3 6.7 2.2 E F 0.1 n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 10.4 n/a n/a M 0.8 7.5 3.8 3.6 2.3 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 31.9 — Teston Village [Public] Maple Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 39.6 2.5 Writing 2.5 2.6 3.0 2.5 2.1 3.8 24.7 9.2 3.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.6 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 p Whitchurch Highlands [Public] Stouffville Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.1 2.4 Special needs (%): 17.0 — Tests not written (%) 1.0 3.6 12.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 2.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.0 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.1 p 5 4.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 6. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.7 3.3 F 0.5 2.4 15. level: Reading 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 89 Terry Fox [Public] Newmarket Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 23.6 — 3.6 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.8 — Writing 2.3 F 0.1 17.7 2.7 2.1 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 98/2742 1124/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — 3.9 4.1 6.6 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 14. of $138.5 2.1 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 19.2 Tests not written (%) 1.3 Special needs (%): 12.3 3.9 2.1 — Math F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2. level: Reading 2.8 12.8 2.5 8.8 2.2 Math F 0.0 2. of $60.6 2. inc.5 2.1 2.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 29.8 2.4 2.5 2.7 3. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.1 — Math 2.1 3.200: 2.9 2.4 3.4 q 2.3 E M 0.6 Math 3.0 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.9 2.3 2.8 2.8 35. of $107.0 3.7 2.1 3.7 3.8 2.9 — Westminster [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 35.6 19.9 — 2.5 E — Math M 0. inc.2 10.7 6.8 2.0 2.1 3.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 Tests not written (%) 4.9 3.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.2 E F 0.0 q Gr 6 avg.5 2.6 2.9 2.8 Math 3.9 2.7 2.5 1.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 1.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Math 2. of $101.1 M 0.9 — Math 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 — Writing 2.5 8.2 18.4 7.5 F 0.2 6.0 3.9 3.2 F 0.2 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 6.4 1.9 — Math 2.2 Special needs (%): 21.9 — Writing 2.4 2.6 Math 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — 13.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math M 0.1 p F 0.600: 1.1 4.7 2.7 2.3 7.9 3.9 3.7 — 6.5 Special needs (%): 19.0 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.9 2.0 — .0 55.9 3.4 3.1 3.8 2.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.9 2.0 3.7 2.0 0.9 2.7 2.4 q Gr 6 enrollment: 80 Special needs (%): 13.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 n/a n/a M 0.4 Overall rank: 623/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 22.7 3.7 2.1 — 39.8 2.6 1.1 F 0.1 2.2 7.6 2.8 2.9 2.8 — Writing 2.2 3.7 2.8 Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 27.3 6.9 3.2 26.5 Overall rank: 212/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $57.6 36.700: -2.2 E F 0.1 2.7 2.2 2. of $68.9 2.6 2.9 2.1 F 0.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $109. level: Reading n/a n/a 3.1 2.3 E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 F 0.2 2.4 — 3.6 — Tests not written (%) 10. inc.1 p 2.5 2.8 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a 2.0 16.1 q Overall rating out of 10 6 6.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2.0 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.4 — Tests below standard (%) 18.0 2.1 M 0.7 5.0 — Tests not written (%) 1.9 Special needs (%): 22.0 p 2.0 3.6 2.7 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 7.7 Overall rank: 235/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 25.800: -6.2 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 — 2.0 3.9 1.8 7.7 26.2 3.1 — 15.8 Writing 2.8 3.9 2.9 2.3 7.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Writing 2.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 60 Special needs (%): 21.0 3.1 22.6 7.9 31. of $54. inc.6 2.8 2.0 — 3.5 — Thornhill [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 31.9 2.7 2.9 22.4 Overall rank: 964/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 8.6 21.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.1 17.0 2.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 8.7 7.8 Gr 6 avg.4 7.9 3.5 M 0.4 2.3 F 0.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 33.8 Writing 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 8.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.8 8.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.0 3.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 8.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 3.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 9.2 F 0.5 19.5 — William Armstrong [Public] Markham Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 6.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 Special needs (%): 6.7 3.2 19.0 — Writing 2.3 Math F 0.9 2.0 2.1 — Math F 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. inc.900: 1. of $60.7 2.2 p F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 5.0 Math 3.9 11.1 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 3.2 Math F 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.1 E M 0.500: 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.5 3.3 n/a n/a 27.1 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 — Writing 2.

1 3.6 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.4 16.9 2.4 M 0.1 F 0.0 3.0 — 2.6 — Writing 2.5 2.5 5.3 — 3.4 9.4 8.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 2.0 3. inc.3 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 21.2 3.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 30.3 3.2 Math F 0.2 — Writing 3.3 4.7 9 7.7 2.9 Writing 2.6 3. of $72.6 2.9 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 32.4 p Math 3.3 11. level: Reading 3.0 — F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 6. level: Reading 2.4 13.9 3.900: 1.3 — 18.2 3.5 — F 0.8 0.9 3.6 — Math 2.6 2.1 4.9 — 6.8 36.5 3.4 4.7 Math 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.5 3.0 — 2.1 2.5 — Math E E M 0.2 — Yorkhill [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 14.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.500: 2.9 2.7 36.2 E F 0.0 — 7.7 Writing 2.1 E F 0.4 3. inc.3 Woodbridge [Public] Woodbridge Gr 6 enrollment: 52 ESL (%): 46.9 3.1 F 0.9 8.4 Writing 2.7 3.8 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 20.3 12.2 2.0 14. level: Reading 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 Math M 0. of $92.3 6.9 2.5 — 3.0 3.3 q Gr 6 avg.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 Math 2.1 1.2 2.9 — 3.3 0.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.8 2.1 3.0 — 2.1 2.6 Tests not written (%) 3.0 3.9 2.1 — 2.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 Math 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 6.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.1 3.4 3.1 E E n/a n/a 21.1 3.1 p 26.1 2.1 F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 0.5 3.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 147/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $118.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 261/2742 177/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 6.8 2.0 3.1 3.5 8.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 26.5 2.1 M 0.8 Math 2.6 3.9 — 2.5 2.2 4.3 32.4 2.2 3.1 — 2.4 n/a n/a F 0.3 3.0 3.5 — Writing 3.9 4.2 3.9 3.9 Writing 2.7 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 31.2 2.2 — Math 3.9 8.7 12.9 — 3.1 — Math M 0.7 — 8.5 0.000: 0.8 3.9 6.2 10.9 3.0 Math 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 — Tests below standard (%) 6.7 3.90 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 William Berczy [Public] Unionville Gr 6 enrollment: 79 ESL (%): 13. level: Reading 2.0 Writing 3.4 F 0.2 E E M 0.3 — 2.7 2. inc.2 F 0.6 3.8 2.5 10.5 E — F 0.4 3.5 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.2 Special needs (%): 7.1 3.4 F 0.3 — 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 M 0.1 3.4 E F 0.9 Special needs (%): 7.0 — 3. inc.4 8.2 3.1 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.3 3.0 — Wismer [Public] Markham ESL (%): 38.7 2.7 3.5 — Writing 2.6 2.2 E F 0.3 — 5.2 43.7 3.6 3.1 6.0 — 2.1 3.0 Math 3.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. of $64.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Overall rank: 1/2742 5/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 8.8 3.1 3.6 2.1 3.3 3.7 2.8 2.500: 2.1 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1443/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.4 F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.8 — 7.1 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2. of $110.6 Gr 6 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 10 10 10 9.5 F 0.8 3.2 F 0.9 2.4 2.9 2.1 — 2.3 — F 0.2 M 0.9 Writing 3.200: 3. level: Reading 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 121/2742 107/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 3.1 0.9 2.1 3.6 8.0 2. level: Reading 3.9 12.8 — Math 2.0 2.0 2.7 12.6 5.7 2.5 29.1 — n/a M 0.0 3.9 3.8 1.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 — .0 — 3.3 F 0.8 3.9 Willowbrook [Public] Thornhill ESL (%): 36.8 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 16.

1 F 0.0 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 — Writing 2.6 2.4 6.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.3 5.8 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.5 2.7 Gr 6 avg.6 2.7 2.7 2.4 5 5.3 M 0.9 2.9 54.4 2.6 0.6 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.6 2.1 M 0.9 5.1 F 0.8 — Writing 2.9 Math 3.7 4.0 Special needs (%): 25.7 2.0 3.200: 1.9 6.4 2.8 2.8 2.2 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.8 Writing 2. inc.6 2.4 — Blyth [Public] Blyth Gr 6 enrollment: 16 ESL (%): 6.6 — 2.0 2.0 0.8 2.1 41.4 3 3.4 2.8 3.8 2.3 2.6 2.7 Gr 6 avg.5 — 6.6 3.5 2.6 Tests not written (%) 2.9 37.8 Math 3.7 2.7 26.4 — 2.0 Overall rank: 787/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 11.9 Special needs (%): 22.9 Math F 0.7 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.5 3.5 n/a n/a F 0.4 2.0 0. of $72.2 6.6 2.9 2.7 5.5 2.7 38. level: Reading 2.6 Math 2.9 — Writing 2.7 Writing 2.7 2.6 2.9 q Overall rating out of 10 4. level: Reading 2.2 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 34.9 — 2.4 F 0.3 F 0.6 — 2.8 2.9 2. of $33.7 Math 2.7 2. level: Reading 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1777/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 3.6 2. level: Reading 3.5 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.3 34.7 42.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 4.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.3 3.3 0.6 — 3.0 37. level: Reading 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.2 E — Math M 0.7 6.9 7.900: 0.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 7.5 E n/a n/a n/a E F 0.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.8 6.5 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 49.9 2.4 2.5 p 5.3 2.5 q 2.3 — Brussels [Public] Brussels Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.7 2.1 0.7 — 2.8 2.800: -1.4 3.9 2.8 — 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.9 — Writing 2.6 Writing 2.4 2.4 5.3 — E F 0.7 — Tests not written (%) 2. inc.6 Math 2.4 2.9 3.0 2.0 — 4.2 Math 2.9 Math 2.6 2.9 3.5 2.5 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 7. level: Reading 2.1 47.6 2.7 3.7 2.6 2.700: 1.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 3.3 q 2.2 — 9.4 2.3 2.4 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 10.7 — Central Perth [Public] Sebringville Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 2. inc.5 5 4. inc.6 2.6 — 2.4 5.5 n/a Avon [Public] Stratford ESL (%): 0.8 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 4.5 2.2 5. of $45.1 Gr 6 avg.1 — 37.5 2.4 2.8 4.7 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 36.4 q Bedford [Public] Stratford ESL (%): 2.0 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.6 2.0 7.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 17.5 q 2. level: Reading 2.1 6.3 2.6 39.5 2.300: -1.2 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.4 — Gr 6 avg.3 — 2.9 2.3 F 0. inc.5 2.2 2. of $38.6 36.3 8.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 4. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.9 — 2.5 2.7 — 11.8 2.1 31.8 Writing 2.5 27.4 2.2 4.5 Tests not written (%) 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.7 2.2 F 0.5 2.9 3.9 Writing 2.8 2.0 — Elma Township [Public] Atwood ESL (%): 7.0 48.6 2.3 F 0.6 36.0 — 2.3 n/a n/a 37.1 F 0.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 23. of $27.6 2.4 Writing 2.1 6.4 24.9 2.2 2.0 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 Special needs (%): 30.8 49.5 q Math 2.8 2.1 0.2 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.500: -2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.2 2.6 2.7 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.5 — 10.0 2.500: -2.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 6.8 Math 3.5 q 1.0 Overall rank: 2183/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 6. of $70.0 Math 3.2 3.4 2.8 — Math 3.7 Writing 2.4 — 2.0 2.3 — 5.5 Math E Tests below standard (%) 40.1 M 0.3 Special needs (%): 12.4 2.1 37.7 — 0.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.8 — 2.5 2.0 2.8 2.4 3.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.6 7.3 3.9 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 41.7 2.8 — 2.7 3.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.6 2.9 50.8 p F 0.1 F 0.7 — Brookside [Public] Lucknow Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 5.9 Writing 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 M 0.0 2.0 — 2.5 — Math 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 5.8 2. of $92. inc.7 29.6 2.600: -0.4 — 2.9 38.7 3.5 2.5 Tests below standard (%) 32.8 — Math 2.8 — Clinton [Public] Clinton ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.3 2. inc.3 — Math 2.2 42.2 30.6 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 18. level: Reading 2.7 Special needs (%): 8.3 51.2 F 0.9 Tests not written (%) 2. of $121.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.1 n/a n/a n/a 49.2 5.9 2.5 2.8 q 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 q 2.7 — Math 2.1 3.6 2.8 14.6 2.9 2.5 5.4 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.5 48.1 n/a 21.4 2.6 Math 2. of $44.7 2.6 2.9 2.6 Tests not written (%) 4.5 2.1 F 0.8 50.4 M 0. inc.000: -3.5 2.4 Writing 2.5 Math F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 7.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 — 2.3 n/a 30.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.7 — Math 2.6 2.3 39. level: Reading 2.2 — F 0.7 2.0 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 11.7 Writing 2.6 2.8 — 2.2 n/a F 0.6 2.2 2.5 — 7.1 7.7 2.2 Gr 6 avg.4 — .4 1.5 4.1 n/a n/a M 0.7 2.7 2.0 — 2.4 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 Overall rank: 2436/2742 1970/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 6.2 Exeter [Public] Exeter ESL (%): 3.6 2.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Math 2.3 F 0.4 — 2.3 2.5 2.6 52.0 Special needs (%): 8.3 q 2.4 3.0 n/a Colborne Central [Public] Goderich Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 0.3 2.1 2.0 0.8 2. inc.0 2.6 2. inc.6 2.4 Tests not written (%) 10. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 — Tests not written (%) 1.5 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 31.4 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.3 2.7 2.2 49.0 3. level: Reading 2.1 4.7 — F 0.9 2.4 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.3 n/a n/a F 0.0 1.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 91 Southwestern Ontario AVON MAITLAND AREA Anne Hathaway [Public] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 54 ESL (%): 1.3 q Overall rating out of 10 6.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.4 45.1 6.6 Math 2.6 2.8 9.5 Math 2.6 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.2 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a M 0.3 n/a E F 0.6 2.0 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.8 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.3 2.8 — 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 Writing 2.5 — Writing 2.100: -1.0 Gr 6 avg.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 34.7 — F 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 0.5 — Downie Central [Public] St Pauls ESL (%): 0.4 5.7 Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $66.8 2.5 2.0 — 6.3 q 2.8 q 2.400: 1.8 Tests not written (%) 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.6 2.5 10.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 28.3 20.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 3.5 2.6 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 7.5 2.6 3.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 2.5 1. of $94.8 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 26 Special needs (%): 11. inc.0 3.6 2.4 — 2.3 1.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.3 0.0 — 3.0 2.4 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 3.4 — Writing 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading E M 0.5 — F 0.7 — Tests not written (%) 3.3 2.9 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.

9 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.7 2.5 7. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.4 Overall rank: 1285/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 2.5 3.3 62.3 — Writing 2.7 2.6 2.9 0.3 4.7 — Writing 2.4 2.2 n/a Overall rating out of 10 7.3 6.3 2.3 2.3 E F 0.6 2.6 2.5 2.0 q Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 3.4 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 34.5 28.9 4.7 — Tests not written (%) 7.6 25.4 2.7 2.0 30.8 2.9 3.6 p Huron Centennial [Public] Brucefield Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 7.1 33.0 2.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 5. inc.6 — Mitchell [Public] Mitchell Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0.8 2.2 — Howick Central [Public] Gorrie ESL (%): 0.9 3.4 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.6 9.1 2.0 p Math 2.5 0.6 — Listowel Eastdale [Public] Listowel Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 0.400: 2.0 Overall rank: 360/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 5.1 2.5 p Tests not written (%) 3.6 2.6 22.0 Special needs (%): 9.7 2.7 3.5 2.1 48.2 2.0 3.3 7 6.0 0.1 3.7 2.9 n/a n/a F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.1 2.8 7.6 2. inc.0 0. of $68.7 2. inc.9 2.8 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 F 0.8 2.4 n/a 2.8 2.8 n/a 2.9 2.3 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.9 45.1 3.4 2.8 2.2 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.6 n/a 2. of $104.5 33.2 3.8 7 7.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 23.4 2.6 2.6 1.6 — Writing 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 — Math 2.4 6.9 3. level: Reading 2.3 23.7 2.4 F 0.8 Overall rank: 2478/2742 1938/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $62.5 n/a 2.1 2.0 n/a Gr 6 avg. inc.5 — Math 2.6 2.1 1.7 2.5 n/a 2. of $68.9 2.2 3.7 2. level: Reading 2.3 6.8 22.8 n/a 2.8 2.8 26.7 — 2. inc.0 Special needs (%): 24.0 2.4 6.8 2.6 2.9 2.6 3. inc.7 2.7 n/a 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5 6.8 38.9 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 2.4 5.7 0.1 3.2 — 2.6 2.7 3.5 q Writing 2.6 n/a n/a F 0.8 — Math 2.1 7.6 n/a 31.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.2 2.8 2.5 18.2 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 4.3 2. inc.0 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.2 2.9 21.9 3.5 — Gr 6 avg.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.5 6.9 18.0 Overall rank: 2342/2742 2204/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Math 2.1 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.0 — Milverton [Public] Milverton Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.2 n/a E F 0.4 20.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.6 3.8 2.4 2.0 — Writing 2.6 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2075/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.1 n/a F 0.2 3.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 5.8 2.8 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.8 37.3 10 7.5 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3. level: Reading 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.3 49.3 3. level: Reading 2. of $71.3 — Writing 2.6 — n/a F 0.8 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1443/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.600: -0. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.5 n/a Math 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 2.3 n/a Writing 3.5 15.1 0.7 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 3.9 7.6 2.0 35. inc.4 2.2 49. of $54.3 2.0 3.8 3.0 2. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.8 2.0 2. inc.0 2. of $68.3 7.4 Overall rank: 1431/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 n/a Writing 2.0 2.2 30.6 2.9 2.6 n/a 2.5 3.1 Special needs (%): 3.9 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 — Math 3.6 — Math 2.3 2.2 2.4 29.7 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 6 6.1 Overall rank: 166/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 3.8 3.7 5.4 2.7 2.7 2.600: -2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 35.7 2.6 2.0 0.9 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.7 n/a 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 6.7 2.7 — Writing 2.3 2.6 2.4 5.8 32.2 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 3.5 5.0 3.4 2.92 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Grey Central [Public] Ethel Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 14.7 2.7 2.7 — 2.7 3.2 4.6 2.7 2.7 2.1 3.1 3.1 7.5 7.2 — .4 n/a n/a Math M 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 3.5 2.4 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0. inc.8 F 0.2 Gr 6 avg.3 5.7 Gr 6 avg.0 Special needs (%): 20.9 Writing 2.0 2.1 2.4 — Listowel Central [Public] Listowel Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.9 n/a Math 2.3 2.1 44.6 — Math 2.8 2.9 n/a Shakespeare [Public] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 n/a Writing 2.4 Overall rank: 166/2742 58/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 n/a 29.5 4.4 Overall rank: 2367/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 7.9 2.6 2.7 2.5 n/a 2.3 2.5 17.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.0 1.9 — Math 3.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 21. level: Reading 2.1 2.6 2.6 — Math 2.700: -0.5 2.4 2.4 2.2 5. level: Reading 3.6 2.3 29.7 2.9 2. of $81.3 — Writing 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.2 0.3 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 — Math 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 54.6 2.1 7.3 0.4 2. of $51.6 6.3 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.8 28.0 n/a 2.0 29.7 2.8 2.1 p Writing 2.9 2.8 2.3 n/a F 0.1 — Writing 2.0 — Writing 2.9 2.2 0.6 2.5 29.7 2.1 48.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.2 p Math 3.900: 2.500: -2.1 6.8 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 2.9 — Math 3.8 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.7 q Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.400: -1.7 2.2 q Gr 6 avg.6 2.0 0.3 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 4. inc.3 8.7 3.7 2.400: 3.6 p Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a F 0.0 2.800: -2.7 2.4 2.0 — Precious Blood [Catholic] Exeter Gr 6 enrollment: 20 ESL (%): 0.8 39.0 1.4 Math M 0. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 48.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.200: 0.2 — Jeanne Sauvé [Catholic] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.7 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.100: -0. inc.7 2.9 2.9 3.7 3.3 12.8 0.3 2.8 2.2 3.7 Writing 2.3 Special needs (%): 14.7 2.8 30.5 2.8 2.6 2.1 n/a 6.7 2.9 3.9 3.7 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 7.6 — 2.1 3.6 3.7 — Writing 2.9 2.2 5.7 2.5 — Writing 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.4 n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.8 42.9 3.9 3.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Overall rank: 1285/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2508/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 19.7 2.7 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.4 2.4 q Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.9 20.6 2.4 2.0 7.3 2.6 — 2.1 11.0 p Overall rating out of 10 3.2 37.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 28.2 n/a Math E E n/a F 0. of $69.3 n/a F 0.8 2.5 4 n/a 6.7 3.8 2.400: 0.8 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 54.6 6.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.7 — Math 2.5 3.5 2.1 3.6 2.0 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.7 6.8 n/a Math 3.7 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.7 2.9 0. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.9 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.7 2.1 n/a F 0.2 5.5 8 8.3 5.7 2.8 2.5 3.8 — Gr 6 avg. inc.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 3.2 36.9 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 7.8 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 n/a Seaforth [Public] Seaforth Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 3.7 2.5 n/a 5. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 M 0.8 — Writing 2.9 n/a Writing 2.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a E E n/a F 0.6 2.6 2.6 — Writing 2.3 0.1 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.8 3.5 2.6 — Math 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 6.3 1.9 3.5 — Math 3.7 — 2.5 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.1 M 0.1 n/a F 0.5 2.7 2.1 — Writing 2.0 2.9 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 p Math 2.9 Math 3.4 2.1 0.9 3.3 3.9 n/a Tests not written (%) 16.0 Special needs (%): 15.1 2.8 2.5 — 14.8 28.0 2.7 2.8 Special needs (%): 21. inc.0 34.7 38.3 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 27.6 3.8 2.0 1.7 2.6 n/a Math 2.5 4.0 3.5 3. level: Reading 3.8 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.8 2.7 2.5 q Hamlet [Public] Stratford ESL (%): 0.8 n/a 2.8 — Lucknow Central [Public] Lucknow Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.3 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.1 — 3.4 q Tests not written (%) 1.1 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 33. of $87.0 Special needs (%): 4.700: 0.5 2.8 — F 0.1 6.8 3.0 3.7 2.7 n/a 40.3 27.5 — 2.6 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2.9 2.2 Tests not written (%) 7.3 2.1 n/a F 0.8 2.0 2.0 1.5 q Math 2.9 2.8 2.0 — 4.0 4.0 0. of $48.6 Math 2.4 2.9 8.9 2.8 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24.2 — Holy Name of Mary [Catholic] St Marys Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.2 — Writing 2.8 0.8 0.9 45.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 6.9 2.6 4.1 q Robertson Memorial [Public] Goderich Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.4 q 3.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.0 1.2 F 0.8 2.7 — Math 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 475/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 n/a n/a n/a 49.4 2.8 — Writing 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 20.0 2.7 2.2 3.9 p Math 3.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Tests not written (%) 10.0 39.9 2.4 6.7 — 2.8 37.8 2.7 2.6 n/a 2.5 2.7 3.8 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.4 — Writing 2.3 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 10.8 — Writing 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Math 2.8 — Math 3.2 0.6 2.6 — Math 2.0 2.9 2.4 — 6.2 7.9 3. of $34.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.0 2.8 0.6 2.8 2.7 2.9 3.6 2.8 2.5 — Writing 2.9 6.3 34.6 2.0 1.5 2.

0 — 2.0 Writing 2.0 34.7 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.0 3.7 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2670/2742 2336/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.6 2.5 Tests not written (%) 7. inc.1 5.6 — Math 2.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 8 7.7 2.7 2.2 6.0 39.4 Overall rank: 71/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 4.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.1 1.9 2.1 5.4 2.6 2.2 Math 2.8 q Math 3.6 2.7 2.0 2.4 q Writing 3.9 2.6 38.3 F 0.9 2.2 25.0 2.9 2.6 — 2.1 q Gr 6 avg.8 6.8 2.6 2.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.7 3.1 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 2.7 2.1 7.2 n/a Victoria [Public] Goderich Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.7 2.6 2. inc. of $30.9 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 3.1 1.5 — Math 2. inc.5 2.6 2.1 39.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 3.8 2.700: -0.8 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.4 F 0.5 2.7 — Writing 2.6 Math 2.4 q Writing 3. level: Reading n/a 2.1 M 0.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 15.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 5.2 Overall rank: 438/2742 88/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 9.0 3.2 49.6 2.5 q 2.7 23.5 2.6 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.8 5.3 — 6.5 2.4 2.8 6.9 2.8 1.6 2.5 2. of $52.1 n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a M 0.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 q Tests not written (%) 6.5 Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2.9 — M 0.5 q 2.7 — Sprucedale [Public] Shakespeare Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 7.3 Tests not written (%) 6.4 2.5 — Agnes Hodge [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.9 2.8 3.3 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 35.8 2.3 F 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.5 2.5 2.7 2.400: -1.5 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.4 2.4 2.3 9.7 2.0 1.8 2.8 2.1 — 2.9 2.2 — 2.2 4. of $63.3 7.3 48.5 q Math 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 — 1.3 2.9 — 5.500: -2. level: Reading 2.7 q Gr 6 avg.0 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 9.6 2. level: Reading 2.6 3.8 2.1 3.4 Writing 2. of $74.2 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 5.8 2.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.9 3.8 2.8 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.4 F 0.6 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 3. inc.3 n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.3 34.7 4.0 0.7 2.9 — Writing 2.0 1.6 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 63.7 32.8 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a Math n/a 2.6 1.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 21.3 2.7 2.6 2.1 n/a F 0. inc.5 7.5 2.8 2. of $70. level: Reading n/a 3.7 — Math 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Overall rank: 964/2742 461/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.7 2.3 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 — Math 2.8 1.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 36.9 2.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 5.6 21.8 6.8 36.1 5.0 2.9 24.8 4.4 6.6 2.0 — Writing 3.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.3 3.3 2.1 3.5 2.7 5. level: Reading 3.0 p Overall rating out of 10 5.8 57.0 3.4 F 0.9 2.2 34.8 2.0 2.1 3.7 St Aloysius [Catholic] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.0 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.0 31. level: Reading n/a 2.2 n/a F 0.8 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.3 2.8 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2035/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 3.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 E M 0. level: Reading 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.7 2.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 Overall rank: 2075/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E n/a M 0.2 3.9 — Math 3.1 2.4 Math F 0.9 3.8 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 7. level: Reading 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32.8 Gr 6 avg.4 0 2.5 2.8 2.0 2.8 64.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.7 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 Writing 2. of $56.4 5.5 2.4 2.5 Overall rank: 1038/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.8 2.4 — F 0.8 2. inc.8 3.1 — .8 q Upper Thames [Public] Mitchell ESL (%): 4.1 7.9 — 2.4 2.8 2.6 3.8 2.4 2.8 — Math 3.1 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 20.0 3.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0. inc.8 7.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 3.7 2.8 0.3 2.5 2.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 37.1 26.4 2.1 n/a 34.2 Tests below standard (%) 44.6 38.2 — St Joseph [Catholic] Clinton Gr 6 enrollment: 15 ESL (%): 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 — Tests not written (%) 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 6 5.3 — 26.2 n/a M 0.6 2. inc.400: -3.0 2.5 2.3 — Writing 2. of $60.4 8.9 2.7 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.1 5.600: -0.4 2.9 1.4 6.0 Special needs (%): 20.800: -1. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 0.1 2.7 2.6 1.8 2.3 n/a Math n/a 2.6 8.0 3.7 2.300: 1.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 25 Special needs (%): 8.4 2. inc.3 40.7 — Overall rating out of 10 4.4 F 0.1 Special needs (%): 3.8 2.4 q M 0.9 12.0 2.6 3.200: 0. inc.8 — Writing 2.0 3.5 n/a Math n/a 3.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2342/2742 2083/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Gr 6 avg.2 Special needs (%): 12.1 3.4 12. of $99.2 2.0 19.6 — St Columban [Catholic] Dublin Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.6 — Writing 3.2 M 0. level: Reading n/a 2.5 19.8 — Writing 2.1 6. inc.2 2.0 26.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 2.8 Math 3.9 2.7 2.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.4 7.4 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. inc.2 3.3 — 2.6 5.7 2.3 Math 2.7 2.8 — Writing 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.1 2.7 — St Mary’s [Catholic] Goderich Gr 6 enrollment: 44 ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 p 1. of $57.4 n/a M 0.9 2.6 2.7 2.7 — Math 2.6 3.0 — 6.8 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3.2 2.9 7.8 78.4 2.2 n/a M 0.9 2.2 Overall rank: 2478/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.8 3.4 n/a M 0.6 — 2.8 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 93 South Perth Centennial [Public] St Marys Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.8 2.1 Gr 6 avg.5 2.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 q Tests not written (%) 16.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.8 2.9 3. of $55.0 3.5 0.5 2.9 2.1 3.8 2.2 n/a 71.6 n/a Wingham [Public] Wingham ESL (%): 0.2 n/a Writing n/a 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 6.2 2.8 2.5 2.4 26.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 54 Special needs (%): 22.9 — St Joseph [Catholic] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0.1 3.5 0.7 2. level: Reading 2. inc. level: Reading 2.1 2.4 3.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.7 q E F 0.5 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.3 Math 2.7 0.1 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.5 2.3 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 33.1 — Math F 0.0 22.6 5.5 — 2.2 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 n/a Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.9 2.8 2.3 2.8 n/a Wallace [Public] Gowanstown Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 3.9 2.1 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 22.1 2.3 2.0 13.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.7 2.9 3.9 — 2.4 5.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — Gr 6 avg.6 — Writing 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 23.0 2.3 — 2.4 8 5.1 2.9 Overall rating out of 10 3.9 — Tests not written (%) 3.5 6.100: -0.5 Writing 2.7 2.1 2.9 1.6 2.0 3.5 2.2 3.7 37.7 Writing 2.7 2.5 4.4 M 0.2 2.4 2.6 33.4 2.8 2.5 2.6 45.7 — Math 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.0 6.2 M 0.5 2.1 M 0.9 2. level: Reading 3.8 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 3.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1886/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — Tests not written (%) 6.0 2.9 28.300: 0.0 22.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1948/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Math 2.2 — 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 q Writing 2.6 7.0 1.2 Overall rank: 2146/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 8.5 q Gr 6 enrollment: 41 Special needs (%): 22.7 2.4 — 5.9 1.4 3.8 2.2 51.9 2.7 2.5 — Math 2.6 2.1 3.9 7.7 St Ambrose [Catholic] Stratford Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.4 — 2.5 F 0.6 — Writing 2.8 2.4 39.9 — Math 3.8 0.6 — 2. level: Reading 2.2 1.7 12.5 6.7 2.6 27.3 8.9 2.5 2.1 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.1 39. inc.7 2.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 7.1 4. level: Reading 2.7 2.9 27.7 2.4 24.0 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.400: 1.8 2.1 Math M 0.5 q Math 2.9 37.9 2.9 5.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.3 48.0 3. level: Reading 3.4 F 0.6 2.8 2.4 5.0 1.8 q 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.7 3.3 37.8 2.6 2.3 F 0.9 2.6 2.2 7.3 2.4 2. level: Reading 2.700: 3.8 3.9 2.0 2.1 Writing 2.5 46.7 2.8 — Writing 2.9 0.3 2.8 5.0 3.9 2.7 Tests not written (%) 4.300: -1.5 2.1 Writing 2.3 2.4 — Writing 2.7 2.0 — 16.0 3.3 Math 2.8 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 3.7 2.9 — Math 2.1 — Tests below standard (%) 46.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.3 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 0.1 52.0 1.7 2. level: Reading 2.2 12.7 2.4 3.4 0.4 2.9 2. of $22.8 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 37.2 q 2.7 2.5 1. of $42.7 2.2 3.0 Special needs (%): 20.7 2.6 2.0 2.4 q Math 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.2 1.4 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.6 1. level: Reading 2.6 Banbury Heights [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 51 ESL (%): 0.4 — 2.1 2.0 2.9 2.4 2.7 2. inc.9 2.7 2.7 — BRANTFORD Bellview [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.8 2.8 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.4 57.3 Tests not written (%) 10.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.6 — 3.5 — 2.1 2.1 2.9 0.0 Special needs (%): 3.5 Writing 2.6 2.6 0.7 2.8 2.7 1.1 3.2 3.6 2.4 — Gr 6 avg.8 77.7 — 10.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.6 6 4.4 2.9 2.9 2.0 8.7 20.0 35.8 2.7 2. of $61.7 45.8 2.4 2.1 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.9 3.

8 2. level: Reading 2.5 — Math 2.8 5.1 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.9 2. of $37.8 2.3 2.6 5.3 2. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.2 2.4 7.7 2.3 F 0.6 — Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 17.3 1. inc. level: Reading 2.2 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.0 Math 3.9 2.6 2.1 q 1.8 — 2.2 2.2 2. of $51.0 51.3 12.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.600: -0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Writing 3.7 1.7 2.4 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 2153/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. of $80.1 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 3.2 2.6 — 2.4 2.1 Overall rank: 360/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.9 — Writing 2.5 2.9 2.500: -0.7 2.1 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 F 0.7 — Math 2.8 — 2.7 2.2 22.3 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3.8 3.6 Tests not written (%) 18.2 Tests not written (%) 3.6 2. of $59.3 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.0 Special needs (%): 26.8 2. level: Reading 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 3.4 5. level: Reading 2.8 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0. level: Reading 3.9 n/a Major Ballachey [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.6 2.8 3.2 2.4 2.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 2000/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.4 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Math F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.1 3.2 q 4.6 1.6 F 0.0 61.9 0.1 5.7 2.5 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.2 34.1 1.7 Overall rank: 360/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.8 2.3 — Writing 2.9 2.2 M 0. of $81.7 6.5 — Dufferin [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.6 — n/a F 0. of $29.7 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 2.7 — 2.6 q 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 6.4 4.1 — M 0.3 — Fairview [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 3.2 2.8 p Writing 2.0 2.8 2.8 33.8 — Tests not written (%) 7.4 2.7 p Tests not written (%) 4. inc.5 2.1 5.0 — Math 3.7 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 18.2 F 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 37.0 3.8 2. inc.7 — 2.7 2.9 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 2.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.6 6.0 0.1 M 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 8.1 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 p Writing 2.9 22.4 2. of $80.5 2.3 2.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 63.0 Special needs (%): 32.4 — 2. inc.7 2.4 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 3.0 3.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.0 0.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a 7.3 0.4 Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 1.0 — Gr 6 avg.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 4.6 2.1 4.0 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 28.5 2.4 2.8 — Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.0 Special needs (%): 7. inc.2 M 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 71.5 Math 2.5 27.8 — 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $45.8 p Math 2.3 n/a Lansdowne-Costain [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 52.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8 8.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.6 M 0.8 1.2 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 59.7 — 1.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.1 2.9 6.4 M 0. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.6 2.5 — F 0.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.2 E — M 0.5 2. inc.5 2.6 Writing 2.6 4.7 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.0 — Math 2.5 Math 2.3 36.9 2.8 2.0 50.0 Special needs (%): 20. level: Reading 2.7 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.6 p King George [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.2 Math 2.3 2.7 43.1 F 0.0 3.7 2.6 — Our Lady of Providence [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 49 ESL (%): 0.8 50.4 Tests below standard (%) 53.2 1.6 — 2.1 2.6 p Writing 2.4 0.2 q 21. level: Reading 3.8 3 5.1 2.7 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a 21.2 F 0.2 E n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.7 — Greenbrier [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.6 1.5 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.6 2.7 Writing 2.7 2.2 — Math 2.9 3.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.3 28.5 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a 3.5 2.5 2.0 — 3.4 n/a 40.9 2.7 2.7 — E F 0.8 3.4 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.7 Math F 0.0 2.8 40.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 Writing 2.8 — 2.9 32. of $54.2 — 2.1 2. inc.6 — 3.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.3 2.3 — Math 2.3 n/a Math n/a n/a E M 0.6 2.0 3.4 2.5 2.5 5.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.0 Special needs (%): 7.6 3.1 32.4 2.7 — 2.3 2.5 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 929/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 32.0 — 6. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.300: 1.8 p Math 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 8.3 2.4 5.2 8.5 2.9 19.5 2.2 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.6 2.9 2.6 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.5 2. of $59.9 q Overall rating out of 10 3.0 — 2.6 2.4 2.0 Writing 2.5 — 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5 4. inc.7 55.0 3.2 5.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.5 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.1 p 27. level: Reading 2.3 2.9 — Onondaga-Brant [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 15 ESL (%): 0. inc.0 53.2 — M 0. of $61.8 2.8 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 3.6 Math 2.5 2 1.2 — 53.800: -1.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.900: -4.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 4.9 2.1 35.0 — 2.0 5.8 — 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.3 — Overall rating out of 10 3 5.1 Writing 3.8 2.2 Writing 2.9 3.0 2.6 0.9 38.6 Math 2.7 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 15.3 Writing 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2702/2742 2323/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.9 2.6 2.5 2.700: -0.6 2.4 2.6 2.3 3.7 3.3 2.4 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 Writing 2.6 7.7 — Writing 2.6 — Writing 2.6 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 2.3 2.6 Writing 2.9 2.4 20.6 2.8 — 2.6 18.8 2.3 M 0.1 2.9 2.0 2.9 61.5 — 2.7 7.1 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.2 Gr 6 avg.8 2.6 Overall rank: 1215/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 Tests not written (%) 3.4 2.2 3.94 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Branlyn [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.2 2.1 2.6 Math 2.6 — 2.8 — Writing 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.1 4.4 Gr 6 avg.2 2.6 7.7 Tests not written (%) 4. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 3.5 1.3 7.6 5.5 — 2.8 2.3 2.2 0.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.2 E F 0.3 Math F 0.8 Math 2.4 2.9 Gr 6 avg.1 2.2 2.9 — Centennial-Grand Woodlands [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 4.6 7.0 2.6 1.8 2.5 2.2 0.6 Writing 2.5 — F 0.6 — 2.6 3.7 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.4 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.9 7.7 15.1 2.9 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.0 2.7 2.7 7.9 2.7 3.4 — 2.7 2.2 2.300: 0.8 1.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.4 F 0.8 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.2 3.7 5. level: Reading 2.7 29.8 p Math 2.1 2.0 0.400: -5.3 2.0 — Writing 2.6 Gr 6 avg.6 14.300: 2.6 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 n/a Brier Park [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 3.5 — Prince Charles [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.8 7.6 — .6 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0.3 9.0 1.8 60.2 1.6 Math 2.4 2.1 F 0.5 2.6 2.3 4.4 — 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.5 2.3 — 1.6 2.3 — 40.0 3.600: -3.7 71.7 2.3 0.3 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg. of $56. inc.8 2.3 44.6 — 2.1 M 0.700: 0.8 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.3 50.5 2.8 8.7 — Gr 6 enrollment: 28 Special needs (%): 32.5 2.5 — 11.1 F 0. inc.6 2.7 2.5 34.3 F 0.3 2.0 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a 2. level: Reading 3.5 — 2. level: Reading 2.1 3.8 2.0 Math 2. inc. inc.9 2.5 0.3 1.0 — Writing 2.9 3.2 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a 2. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 3.2 q Writing 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 E M 0.2 Cedarland [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.7 3.5 5.3 Math 2.3 2.5 — Math 2.1 n/a M 0.6 2.9 6.7 3.8 1.6 Notre Dame [Catholic] Brantford ESL (%): 0.6 2.6 2.4 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.3 2.800: -0.6 2. inc.1 n/a n/a M 0.7 q Math 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.6 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 — James Hillier [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.8 3.9 Overall rank: 2730/2742 2308/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 79.6 2.8 q 2.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 — 8.5 p F 0.1 39.0 Overall rank: 2035/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 36.4 52.8 2.8 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 15. level: Reading 1.0 43. of $64.9 3.2 2.4 2.6 — 9.7 39.0 Special needs (%): 25.4 2.2 17.5 Math 2.6 5.3 Overall rank: 511/2742 325/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.1 2.8 17.8 30.9 31.9 Overall rating out of 10 2.9 4.8 — Writing 3.6 2.0 3.400: 1. of $59.6 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 25.6 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 2.5 43.0 0.7 3. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 9.8 2.2 — 6.9 — 2.2 Overall rank: 2735/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.6 — 1.8 2.4 34. of $41.3 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Math M 0.1 M 0.300: -1.1 35.4 0.8 Writing 2.900: -0.6 2.2 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 27.3 E M 0.3 — 5.9 2.9 5.5 2.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a 0.8 2.8 2.0 2.3 41.4 2.3 1.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.

2 35.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.4 2.7 — 2.7 n/a 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 7. inc.6 3.3 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2. level: Reading 2.3 3.5 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 16.7 — Gr 6 avg.6 2. of $78.4 — Math 2.7 2.0 n/a Resurrection [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 4.3 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 51. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 — Writing 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.0 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Writing 2.2 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 29.700: -4.7 2.0 n/a Woodman-Cainsville [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 4.1 2.0 2.7 2.700: 0.3 2.6 q Math 3.4 — Writing 2.4 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.5 Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 46.7 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2.1 2.5 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.8 2.3 2.8 2.5 2.4 n/a 2.2 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 15.0 0.8 — St Patrick [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.7 Gr 6 avg.3 25.3 3.0 Special needs (%): 21.0 3.3 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.5 2.7 q 4.2 6.7 2.3 q Tests not written (%) 3.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 — St Leo [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.2 n/a Math 2.7 n/a 2.0 Writing 2.1 — 30.0 Special needs (%): 10.7 q St Bernard [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.9 2.900: -2.6 30.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 2. level: Reading 2.000: 0.0 2.6 n/a 2.0 3.6 2.0 2.9 — 6.9 — Writing 2.7 2. of $40.5 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 39.8 2.2 8.9 p Writing 2.1 3.8 — Writing 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 — Math 2.1 30.5 F 0. of $63.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2.8 3.5 7.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 — F 0. level: Reading n/a 2. of $68. level: Reading 2.0 2.2 3.6 2.8 2.4 2.4 n/a 2.1 2.8 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.1 2.7 — 2.4 2.7 2.8 1.6 Math 2.6 q Gr 6 avg.5 2.8 2.6 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.4 48.4 Overall rank: 2146/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 n/a 0.5 2.6 Math 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2. inc.9 4.3 Tests below standard (%) 32.4 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.8 2.3 n/a E F 0.1 3.6 — Math 3.4 2.3 2.7 2.4 32.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.3 2.7 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.4 — 3.9 — Math 3.6 3.5 Math F 0.7 2.800: -0.5 2.1 2.7 — F 0.4 2.2 E F 0.6 48.8 3.8 7.1 — 41.2 Overall rank: 1610/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.9 0. inc.7 2. level: Reading n/a 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.5 5.7 2.3 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.4 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 n/a 2.3 q Writing 2.4 24.7 n/a 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1948/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.4 26.6 2.4 33.8 3. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.6 n/a St Theresa [Catholic] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.2 1.9 2.4 Overall rank: 623/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $55.7 2.5 5.5 q Writing 2.1 2.7 Math 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 63. inc.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.2 36.7 3.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 42.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.8 5.0 n/a Writing 2.8 2.7 39.8 8 7.3 2.1 3.7 2.6 n/a 2.1 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.0 2.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 25.6 q Gr 6 avg.0 2.7 2.8 3.300: 0.6 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Writing 2.2 3.4 q Math 2.0 3. inc.3 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 n/a 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — 2.3 2.9 7.4 2. inc.6 2.9 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 3.6 Math 2.0 0.9 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 2.100: -0. level: Reading 3.9 3.2 43.6 5.6 2.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 3.2 0.5 — 2.7 Writing 2.9 2.0 43.1 Overall rank: 2284/2742 2255/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 E n/a M 0.4 2. of $58.6 3.0 0.0 p Writing 2.8 2.6 2.5 F 0.7 6.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.0 Special needs (%): 22.4 n/a Overall rating out of 10 3.7 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 7.1 F 0.7 2.4 18.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 95 GRAND ERIE AREA Princess Elizabeth [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.0 3.2 2.4 n/a 2.3 2.2 2.2 33.8 2.4 2.9 2.2 6.4 6.8 2.2 F 0.9 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a Tests not written (%) n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 33 Special needs (%): 6.4 F 0.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 n/a 5. level: Reading n/a 3.6 2.4 2.0 21.2 3.8 2.6 F 0.9 2.6 n/a 2.6 2. level: Reading 3.0 0.7 0.5 2.7 2.0 — 2.6 n/a 40.7 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.0 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2. of $65.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.4 2.4 2.8 n/a 2.8 n/a Boston [Public] Waterford Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.4 7 5. of $38.9 1.6 Math 2.9 6.7 n/a 2.9 2.0 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.9 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 5.6 — 4.4 58.9 2.2 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.5 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — Writing 2.2 n/a M 0.7 n/a M 0. inc.0 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.3 n/a Math 2.3 3.0 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.1 2.7 2.4 2.1 0.8 2.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 23.1 E M 0.1 Math F 0.8 2.2 0.1 4.0 0.8 19.3 F 0.7 2. of $46. level: Reading 2.6 34.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1556/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 — F 0.6 2.7 — 2.8 5.700: 2.5 2.0 3.3 Tests not written (%) 0.2 F 0.800: -1.3 5.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.0 0.2 Overall rank: 1499/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.800: 0. of $68.5 q Math 3.4 31.9 2.5 — 3.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.1 F 0.9 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.7 5.3 2.8 3.6 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.1 2.5 n/a 2.1 4.1 p Tests not written (%) 4.7 2.3 2.8 3.0 44.5 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.7 8.6 5.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a F 0.6 2.8 2.0 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 Overall rank: 2393/2742 929/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.7 3.6 2.2 2.2 5.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 5.4 n/a n/a Math M 0.9 2.7 — 2.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 8.0 2.9 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 2.8 54.700: 0.7 63.2 n/a 52.3 3.2 23.9 15.8 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.0 2.6 — 2.7 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 17.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.1 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 5.1 4.2 2.4 2.3 q Tests not written (%) 7.1 2.7 2.7 n/a 2.3 2. of $65.100: -1. of $68.5 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 13. inc.3 Special needs (%): 23.0 2.9 2.2 18.7 2.9 2.3 2. of $62.1 F 0.2 2.0 3.2 3. level: Reading n/a 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 3.7 2.8 — Math 2.7 2.9 2. inc.2 6.5 n/a Writing 2.2 2. inc.4 38.6 q Writing 2.8 — 2.6 Writing 2.8 2.6 2.3 34. level: Reading 2.3 Tests not written (%) 2.2 2.5 2.3 7.3 2.8 n/a 2.4 0.2 Special needs (%): 16.7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading n/a Writing n/a Math n/a Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.1 2.8 — Math 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 18.8 2.7 2.5 2.1 — .4 2.8 2.3 q Gr 6 avg.4 n/a St Gabriel [Catholic] Brantford ESL (%): 0.1 2.7 n/a 4.0 2.2 5 4.9 2.4 Writing 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 3.4 2.600: 1.9 2.7 2.7 n/a 2.4 F 0.3 F 0.9 n/a 1.4 E n/a 40.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.3 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 53.7 2. inc.2 q 2.0 3.6 27. of $70.4 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 n/a 57.2 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.5 Writing 2.2 3.6 42.1 5. of $72.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.5 Special needs (%): 13.9 2.6 5.9 — Ryerson Heights [Public] Brantford Gr 6 enrollment: 58 ESL (%): 0.5 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.7 — F 0.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 26.8 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 20.7 3.8 n/a 7.6 2.1 Overall rank: 330/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 q 2.4 47.4 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.0 Special needs (%): 8.4 28.6 — 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 51.5 24.7 20.1 4.4 2.4 2.3 — Blessed Sacrament [Catholic] Burford Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.0 0.8 — Overall rating out of 10 2.1 28.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 F 0.900: 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a M 0.8 n/a 2.2 E F 0.6 n/a 2.4 M 0.7 2.4 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 — 8.2 Overall rank: 1285/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.0 Overall rank: 2709/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.5 — 2. inc.7 2.0 0.2 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.6 2.8 2.5 — F 0.0 5.2 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.8 p Math 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 1.6 2. inc.5 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.2 7.8 2.9 7.1 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.2 n/a Bloomsburg [Public] Waterford Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 — 2.4 0.1 7.5 3.4 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 q Russell Reid [Public] Brantford ESL (%): 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.0 0.6 2.6 — Bethel [Public] Paris ESL (%): 0.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.0 2.0 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.400: 0.9 Overall rank: 396/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 9. level: Reading 2. inc.2 p Burford District [Public] Burford ESL (%): 0.6 — Math 3.5 2.3 q Writing 2.7 2.3 M 0.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 7.8 2.4 2.3 40.1 53.7 3.5 2. level: Reading 3.3 0. level: Reading 2.5 2.5 — 2.8 2.2 n/a Gr 6 avg.3 6.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.8 36.8 n/a Math n/a 3.

7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 0.6 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 — M 0.1 38.9 2.4 2.3 39.9 2.4 2.5 2.7 8.4 — Tests not written (%) 3.5 2. of $54.9 2.2 47.1 Tests below standard (%) 52.7 2.2 39.1 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 41.4 2.1 — Writing 2.6 Writing 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 44.6 2.2 2.5 1.0 2.6 2.3 F 0.9 2.8 3.6 2.4 Writing 2.4 — 2.8 — 2.0 — Doverwood [Public] Port Dover ESL (%): 0.0 36.4 2. level: Reading 1.4 2.8 — 2.4 2.8 1.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.8 4.4 2.3 — 0.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 85.6 2.6 2.4 45.500: -2.8 — 2. inc.7 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.3 1.6 n/a n/a F 0.0 1.8 57.4 1.9 n/a 2.7 1.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 F 0.4 2.200: 0.6 — 2.1 n/a n/a 41.6 2.3 2.2 — F 0.0 1.7 2.2 F 0.9 2.3 2.8 2.3 — Writing 1.1 1.3 — Math 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.5 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 57.2 1. level: Reading 2.5 2.0 — Holy Family [Catholic] Paris Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.6 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.5 2.7 Math 2.4 2.6 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 2.5 F 0.5 2.96 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Caledonia Centennial [Public] Caledonia Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.5 2.0 34.8 2.3 2. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 47.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 q 2.2 — Writing 2.8 4.7 2.8 1.8 37.5 2.5 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2478/2742 2057/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — .7 2.7 2.6 2.4 Math 2.5 q Writing 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 21. inc.5 54.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.3 q 6.4 Math 2.2 0.3 2.2 — 2.2 2.7 2.2 2.9 6.7 2.2 7. level: Reading 2.4 0.9 2.7 2.6 Gr 6 avg.9 1.5 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 6.6 3.4 2.1 F 0.1 12.8 — Writing 2.6 78. inc.0 0. level: Reading 2.2 n/a F 0.4 2. level: Reading 1.6 0.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0. level: Reading 1.1 — Math 1.5 2.2 81.6 — 2.6 1.5 2.3 2.2 2.4 F 0.6 — Math 2.6 2.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 85.6 2.3 2.3 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.0 2.0 — Writing 1.7 2.2 1.6 — Writing 2.6 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 1.5 2.3 n/a n/a E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.0 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2735/2742 2345/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.6 — Writing 2.4 — 14.6 4.6 2.3 5.3 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 — 2.5 1.8 6.0 Special needs (%): 5. level: Reading 2.4 M 0.1 4.8 — 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.6 2.6 0. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.6 — Math 2.9 2.4 1.2 Math F 0.8 — Overall rating out of 10 0 0 0 0.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.6 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.0 7.1 2.5 n/a 2.4 F 0.6 48.7 p 2.5 4.1 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 2.0 0.1 2.6 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.0 78.900: -0.0 Special needs (%): 15.5 2.7 Overall rank: 1886/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 26.8 2. of $70.8 — Writing 2.1 1. level: Reading 2.3 Math 2.6 2. inc.7 2.6 3.2 — F 0.3 11.5 1.4 q Overall rating out of 10 0.2 2.4 1.4 2.6 1.9 5.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 — F 0.5 2.2 2.5 32.7 2.6 1.1 6.3 F 0.0 0.3 2.4 3 4 3.0 Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.8 2.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 55 Special needs (%): 10.9 84.5 — Writing 2.7 2.1 Elgin Avenue [Public] Simcoe ESL (%): 0.3 62. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.5 2.9 n/a 2.9 41.8 2.3 Math 2.4 2.9 — Math 1. inc.2 44.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.2 E F 0.7 Tests not written (%) 11.1 6.6 2.5 Delhi [Public] Delhi ESL (%): 0.6 — Writing 2.8 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.3 16.9 — Gr 6 avg.9 Math F 0.8 4.5 5.200: 0.4 53. level: Reading 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 6.9 2.1 2.2 n/a n/a Math F 0.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.9 n/a 2.1 Tests not written (%) 2.8 47.0 1.7 2.8 2.1 2.6 p Math 1.4 4.4 2.8 2.9 3.5 2. inc.4 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.8 2.8 2.2 0 0 0.0 2.8 2.5 50.4 Tests below standard (%) 41.5 Overall rank: 1948/2742 2172/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 Writing 2.6 26.2 q 4.1 — Math 2.8 39.9 2.0 1. level: Reading 2.6 7.5 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2575/2742 2308/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.3 — F 0.2 33.5 41.2 0.3 Writing 2.5 n/a 36.3 41.3 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 Gr 6 avg.5 Writing 2.6 2.700: -1.1 — Overall rating out of 10 0 2.1 1.9 2.5 — 2.4 3.6 Math 2.4 Math 2.4 Math 2.3 F 0.9 2.5 — Emily C General [Private] Ohsweken Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.6 — 2.6 5.2 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 16.6 1. inc.0 2.7 n/a 2.0 2.6 — 2.6 1.3 2.3 2.6 n/a F 0.5 — J L Mitchener [Public] Cayuga ESL (%): 0.9 2.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 — 2.0 2.0 2.6 0.1 2.0 2.9 p Math 2.4 1.5 2.9 9. level: Reading 1.4 q 39.1 F 0.1 — Houghton [Public] Langton ESL (%): 10.8 2.5 Overall rank: 2183/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.4 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.4 2.6 2. of $62.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2342/2742 2204/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.7 p 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.700: -1.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.8 2.5 41.1 q n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 Special needs (%): 33.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.4 Tests not written (%) 20.1 2.5 1.0 4.4 49.5 2.9 88.5 2.5 5.3 62.8 6.7 — 2.3 Writing 2.8 2.6 2.2 n/a Courtland [Public] Courtland ESL (%): 2.3 — 3.3 p Writing 2.7 2. inc.0 Special needs (%): 6.0 5.4 — Math 1.5 — 2.4 2.2 51.6 n/a Math 2.7 2.6 2.5 n/a Math 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2183/2742 1970/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 29.9 1.4 2.3 Writing 2.3 7.4 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2.4 Writing 2.1 2.9 Gr 6 avg.5 Math 2.6 2.0 3.9 — 1.7 n/a n/a Math E M 0.6 2.9 3.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 24. inc. inc. level: Reading 2.9 — 4.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2. inc.7 2.9 2.5 Math 2.800: -0.5 2.6 2.5 — I L Thomas Odadrihonyani’ta’ [Private] Ohsweken Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.3 2.5 n/a F 0.2 2.3 F 0. inc.3 2.6 27.5 2.3 42.5 Writing 2.8 58. inc.6 3.5 2.3 2.0 0.0 Special needs (%): 11.9 p F 0.1 1.6 2.8 — 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 F 0.6 Gr 6 avg.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Math 3.0 1.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.7 2.0 3.6 2.5 q 2.9 2.700: -1.2 2.4 2.1 1.3 F 0.6 1.1 Tests not written (%) 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.3 5.3 — 5.3 q 2.1 1.0 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.7 2.1 69.1 E E — 49.7 2.7 n/a 2.4 4.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 2.3 2.4 2.6 — 2.6 2.2 8.8 2.6 n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 3.5 2.7 Tests not written (%) 7.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.5 2.3 29. level: Reading 2.0 2.9 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.5 q 2.7 n/a 4.3 2.7 1.2 0.1 — M 0.7 2.5 — 15. of $53.6 60.6 4.0 48.7 1.4 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 3.3 2.3 33.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 6.6 44.5 2.7 Math 2. of $60.2 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 — Math 2.6 — Math 2.6 2.1 28.4 — 2.2 6.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 Writing 2.3 2.7 4.0 0.5 6.5 2. level: Reading 2.4 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 81.3 Writing 2.8 — 4.6 2.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 3.5 — 5 3.5 2.9 — 5.7 — 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2735/2742 2346/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.300: -1.1 5.5 — Math 2.6 1.4 2.5 — Writing 2.3 2.1 F 0.5 2.7 Math 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2262/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 p 2.7 — Glen Morris Central [Public] Glen Morris Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 7.4 3. of $51.4 2.1 5 5.3 2.7 2.8 n/a Writing 2.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 21.6 n/a Writing 2.7 — 2.0 n/a 44.1 Math F 0.3 Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 43.8 2.5 Overall rank: 1087/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.8 2.2 n/a Tests not written (%) 1.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1970/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 1.3 2.7 45.6 2.0 — 17. level: Reading 2.2 2.6 — 2. of $51.8 — Fairview Avenue [Public] Dunnville Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 31 Special needs (%): 22.6 44.3 2.1 — 39.6 2.8 2.7 2.3 n/a 0.4 Math 2.9 2.0 0.3 5.3 — 2.8 1.0 — Gr 6 avg.3 — 2.9 1.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.7 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 — 0. level: Reading 1.3 q Grandview Central [Public] Dunnville Gr 6 enrollment: 15 ESL (%): 0.6 — 2.7 n/a F 0.7 2.2 F 0.7 2.1 Math M 0.6 Gr 6 avg.6 2.4 2.8 48.6 0.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 45.8 1.3 2.9 33.2 4.1 2. of $76.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 F 0.8 2.5 2.7 6 5.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 0.7 — Hagersville [Public] Hagersville ESL (%): 0.3 n/a n/a 35.4 26.3 4.6 — 2.6 2.1 9.8 2.4 — F 0. level: Reading 2.8 5.4 4.0 3.7 2.2 n/a M 0.6 2.3 — 2.5 4 3.3 3.7 2.5 75.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — 2.6 2.6 Math 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.6 2.3 F 0.5 2.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 26.4 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 — 2.6 3.5 3.0 — Math 2.0 3. level: Reading 2. of $68.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 1.8 Gr 6 avg. inc.6 2.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 1.1 F 0.6 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.8 2.3 1.7 2.3 2.100: -2.7 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 35.5 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.2 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 72.3 Overall rating out of 10 4 Jamieson [Private] Ohsweken Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.2 2.5 3. level: Reading 2.3 n/a n/a F 0.6 2. of $73.5 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.5 2.

inc.1 1.0 1.8 5. inc.7 Gr 6 avg.0 31.6 2.600: 0.3 35.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $57.5 2.6 2.3 2.4 40.4 — Math 2.2 1.9 10.8 2. level: Reading 3.7 Overall rank: 1948/2742 2172/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 38.6 2.8 3.2 3.5 0.5 2.6 n/a 32.5 2.1 Math M 0.7 2.2 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 39.6 2.1 2.8 52.0 3.600: -3.1 M 0.5 0.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7 7. inc.5 2.4 2.2 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 48.9 2.8 — Math 2.1 5.9 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 3.6 — Writing 2. of $61.2 49.5 2.2 5.0 Special needs (%): 6.5 2. of $68.7 2. inc.7 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 1.4 — .9 F 0.5 4.6 3.2 51. level: Reading 2.2 7.7 5.6 2.8 2.6 — 2.8 5.3 10 8.8 1.6 2.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.1 5.700: -0.2 q Writing 2.9 n/a Writing 2.7 2.0 2.8 — Math 2.7 2.1 4.7 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 Tests not written (%) 1.0 Special needs (%): 10.300: -1.7 p Writing 2.7 — Gr 6 avg. of $83.2 n/a Writing 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.2 1.6 — Writing 3.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 Math 2.5 Writing 2.6 37.5 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.8 — 2.7 2.4 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 16.1 49.7 3.1 2.4 F 0.8 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 97 Jarvis [Public] Jarvis Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 3.6 — Writing 2.9 2. inc.5 2.6 2.4 n/a Math 2.3 3.4 Math F 0.5 0.8 — Sacred Heart [Catholic] Langton Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 6. inc.0 37.3 3.8 2.4 n/a 2.1 F 0.1 1.2 1.6 — Tests not written (%) 5.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.1 n/a n/a n/a M 0.0 Special needs (%): 0.3 2.4 5.0 Special needs (%): 15.6 2. inc.2 F 0.6 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 0.400: -0.7 16.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.5 2. level: Reading 2.2 28.3 Math 2.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.8 3.7 1.7 3.6 Paris Central [Public] Paris Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.4 2.0 Special needs (%): 11.8 — Oliver M Smith-Kawenn:io [Private] Ohsweken Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.300: -0.2 q 2.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 38.5 2.5 5.7 2.0 2.6 5.7 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 2.8 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 — Writing 2.8 2.8 — 3.4 2.8 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 7.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 31.1 2.7 2.9 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.6 2.2 27.1 2.5 2.8 p Math 2.9 3.2 2.2 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 — Math 2.6 2.7 — 1.8 0.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.7 27.4 61.6 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a F 0.4 5. level: Reading 2.0 3.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 1. level: Reading 2.9 64.9 3.5 0. inc.0 3.3 2.6 2.8 — 2.6 — Math 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 38.0 p Writing 2.2 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 19.600: 0.5 n/a 2.3 6. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 2. inc. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 Overall rank: 1723/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 28.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 25.7 Math 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.6 — Writing 2.6 2.3 2.5 Overall rank: 2262/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 34.5 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 — Oneida Central [Public] Caledonia Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.9 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 15.5 5.3 2.5 2.8 2.3 2.8 2.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.4 2.1 7.8 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.3 — Writing 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.6 3.1 F 0.8 3.0 0.6 — Seneca Central [Public] York Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.1 p Tests not written (%) 2.2 — F 0.6 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 — F 0.5 6.2 4.4 2.4 3.0 2.1 6.3 n/a n/a Math F 0. level: Reading 2.8 — Math 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.8 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 3.9 37.5 Writing 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 p Math 2. inc. inc.8 3.6 3.2 F 0.7 2.6 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.200: -0.8 2.2 4.4 2.6 2. of $67.6 2.7 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 25. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2686/2742 2340/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 0.7 — Math 2.0 p 6.8 Mount Pleasant [Public] Mount Pleasant Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.5 2.1 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 69.0 Special needs (%): 16.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.5 2.0 43.8 2.2 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.8 7.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 38.0 Special needs (%): 26.0 Tests not written (%) 4.9 2.3 5.5 2.3 6.7 — Writing 2.9 — River Heights [Public] Caledonia ESL (%): 0.5 5.6 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.000: 0.5 2.8 — Writing 2.4 q F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Writing 2.5 2.5 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.2 4.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 56.4 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a F 0.8 3.400: 1. level: Reading 2.6 3.3 2.5 2.3 39.8 3.6 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) 1.7 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 29.0 2.7 2. inc.5 2.8 — Math 2.8 — North Ward [Public] Paris ESL (%): 0.9 2.4 0.6 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.6 q 2.6 2.0 8. of $33.9 3.1 M 0.2 2.8 43.3 F 0.9 Special needs (%): 10.0 2.7 2.4 n/a 2.0 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.2 3.2 38.0 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 38.3 25.2 7.9 3.0 2.6 — Math 2.1 E p 33.3 2.6 n/a Rainham Central [Public] Fisherville Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0. inc.6 2. inc.7 — 6.6 2.0 — 4.6 0.9 2.4 6.8 2.0 1.6 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.6 — Writing 2.3 — 5.7 Writing 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.0 — F 0.7 2.6 2.6 2.9 4.5 2.7 2.4 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 1.0 0. of $86.0 0.5 3.6 1.5 2.9 — Writing 2.8 72.5 0.7 n/a Math 2.9 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 2.2 2.0 — Math 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 4.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.6 — Overall rating out of 10 3. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.8 2.9 2.7 2.0 41.8 2.9 2.0 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 0 1.0 0.7 — Writing 2.4 q 2.5 2.3 4.6 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 8.7 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2. of $81.1 6.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2.3 2.5 — 2.2 F 0.4 2.9 — Writing 1.7 34.0 Special needs (%): 3.5 2.9 2.7 — Math 1.9 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 n/a 2. of $56.5 n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math F 0.4 1.4 — Math 2.0 — Lynndale Heights [Public] Simcoe Gr 6 enrollment: 39 ESL (%): 0.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 7.3 7.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.7 2.0 0.6 2.0 1.7 2.6 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.5 n/a 44.4 1.6 — Math 2.4 2.8 — Math 3.8 Math 2.7 Tests not written (%) 2. of $58.3 2.6 3.7 Overall rank: 2075/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 1.1 M 0.0 3.8 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 8.3 — Port Rowan [Public] Port Rowan Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 0.6 2.5 2. of $59.8 2.2 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.3 2.6 Math 2.5 44.7 Writing 2.700: -1.0 — 2.5 8.0 0.8 2.3 Overall rank: 1655/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 6.5 — Notre Dame [Catholic] Caledonia ESL (%): 0.8 3.0 0.3 M 0.9 73.6 — F 0.5 n/a F 0.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.1 M 0.4 — 2.1 Overall rank: 1556/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.8 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2583/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 4.9 2.1 1.4 32.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2. inc.1 — Tests not written (%) 10.1 n/a 2.000: 1.2 2.8 2.1 40.6 2.7 24.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 61 Special needs (%): 19.7 2.7 — 2.4 F 0. of $45.4 Math 2.0 18.8 36.6 3.5 q Writing 2.7 6 7.6 2.1 F 0.2 F 0.4 2.2 E F 0.5 2.1 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.5 F 0.5 2.2 1.1 2.8 2.5 — Writing 2.3 2.8 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.4 2.3 1.1 — Writing 2.0 3.1 E — 36.8 2.0 2.8 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 2.9 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1156/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 — Math 3.2 F 0.6 5.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 38.4 F 0.1 0.9 2.3 36.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 3.4 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.6 — 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.9 — Writing 2.7 2. of $61.9 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.2 F 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.6 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — Oakland-Scotland [Public] Scotland Gr 6 enrollment: 27 ESL (%): 0.5 2.9 5. level: Reading 2.5 2.6 Overall rank: 623/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.7 — 3.2 5.2 n/a 5.3 2.8 2.8 3.3 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.8 3.3 p Langton [Public] Langton Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 55. level: Reading 2.8 2.400: -0.1 3.4 38.5 2.8 2.2 Overall rank: 2146/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 2.3 7.3 n/a 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.2 2.6 3.8 47.2 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 56.6 2.6 21.7 2.5 2.0 — 5.8 2.5 2.6 — Math 2.6 3.1 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.0 — Writing 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.6 25.0 1.3 1.5 2.9 — Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 22.0 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 1.6 2.6 Overall rank: 396/2742 177/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 4.9 — Gr 6 avg.8 6.9 1.8 2.6 38.0 26.8 3.7 33.3 18.8 2.2 Special needs (%): 20.1 — Tests not written (%) 0.3 2.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 — Math 2.4 n/a 3.7 2.5 — 2. level: Reading 2.6 17.4 59.7 5.6 2.2 Overall rank: 1991/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. of $46.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.7 0.7 2.3 8.5 2. level: Reading 3.400: -0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.6 2.8 3.0 38.5 F 0.5 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.

9 3.4 24. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.7 — St George-German [Public] St George Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.0 — Writing 2.7 46.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 6.5 — Amherstburg [Public] Amherstburg Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.5 6.7 3.2 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.5 2.0 n/a Writing 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2.8 2.9 34.0 3.3 2.5 2.6 3.7 2.5 2.3 5.0 Special needs (%): 14. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 n/a 2.7 2.5 2.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.4 n/a 2.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 45. inc.4 7.1 27. of $69.7 2.0 3.8 3.7 0.5 Math 2.2 — Anderdon [Public] Amherstburg ESL (%): 5.2 — Writing 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 F 0.5 2.0 3.3 n/a F 0.7 2.0 — Math 2.5 Math 2.5 2.6 2.0 1. level: Reading 2.2 n/a n/a F 0.6 — Writing 2.0 0.8 2.7 2.3 13.7 2.0 0.3 0.5 — Math 3.7 2.0 Overall rank: 2436/2742 1970/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.2 F 0.8 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4 5.5 2.1 n/a n/a n/a 35.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.7 M 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.900: 0. inc.1 M 0.6 3.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.7 2.5 28. inc.3 25.0 2.3 8.2 Overall rating out of 10 7.0 Special needs (%): 8.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.700: 0.9 2.3 F 0.3 n/a F 0.2 n/a 34.6 q Math 2.5 M 0.5 — Math 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.1 M 0.5 2.3 2.0 Tests not written (%) 2.4 6.3 F 0.4 3.7 6 4.2 28.5 — Math E F 0.5 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.5 2.0 3.7 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.3 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 2. of $63. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 47.3 2.0 2.5 31.8 2.0 — 2.0 — Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 28.0 — 5.3 — Tests not written (%) 7.4 2.7 2.7 5.8 2.8 2.7 n/a 41.9 2.0 0.1 28.5 2. inc.7 0.7 2.4 2.1 p Writing 2.9 3.5 2.4 2.8 Math 3.2 37.2 F 0.7 7. level: Reading 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.1 6.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 — 2.4 2.8 — 3.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 — Math 2.6 1.1 28.6 2.1 3.3 0.98 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Bernard of Clairvaux [Catholic] Waterford Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.0 Tests not written (%) 1.3 41.5 2.1 M 0.2 2.0 0.5 2.0 6.8 2.4 2.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 3.8 2.9 n/a 3.0 Special needs (%): 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 0.5 3.0 1.4 24.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.1 30.8 — St Frances Cabrini [Catholic] Delhi Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.4 — 2.0 2.4 F 0.8 2. of $63.6 2.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.0 2.5 2.3 — M 0.2 n/a n/a Math n/a M 0.6 n/a 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 1. inc.0 2.0 Special needs (%): 17.7 2.7 2.7 2.5 Math 2.6 2.5 — Writing 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.4 8.8 6.5 q F 0.7 2.4 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.8 2.0 2.6 3.3 — Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 34.7 5.7 q F 0.8 2.4 F 0.7 6.7 2.9 5.5 5.2 — Tests below standard (%) 40.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.6 Math 2.7 — Math 2.6 — 4.5 3. level: Reading 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 — St Patrick’s [Catholic] Caledonia Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 0.3 2.8 — Gr 6 avg. inc.8 3.4 4.7 2.6 q Overall rating out of 10 5.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.500: 1.9 0.5 — Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 5.2 E F 0.5 Gr 6 avg.7 2.7 39.5 3.0 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.8 39.8 — Thompson Creek [Public] Dunnville Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.6 32.8 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 Gr 6 avg.7 2.100: 2.6 q Math 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 21.7 5.4 0.7 7.9 q Gr 6 avg.0 Tests not written (%) 1.1 3.9 3.5 2.2 — Writing 2.7 2.6 2.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.7 2.5 2.2 2.1 3.5 2.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.8 2.0 38.9 37. of $61.5 Writing 2.1 F 0.1 n/a n/a n/a M 0.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 Overall rank: 1556/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 n/a F 0.6 2.3 2.7 — Walsh [Public] Simcoe ESL (%): 2.1 p 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 Writing 2.1 F 0.7 2.5 47.1 — Tests not written (%) 0.9 — Math 2.9 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.9 3.5 2.2 15.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2284/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 2.8 28. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 Tests below standard (%) 50.5 — Math 2.0 — Math 2.9 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 4 5.3 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 11.0 n/a Tests not written (%) 7.9 p Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.6 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.1 F 0.4 F 0.6 Overall rank: 1087/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. inc.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.9 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 18.0 0.6 2.7 2.8 4.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.5 2.7 2.600: 0.0 3.8 2.6 2.3 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 2. level: Reading 2.000: 0.6 3.1 38.5 n/a West Lynn [Public] Simcoe Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 0.9 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.8 — Gr 6 avg.4 2.5 46. inc.0 2.8 — Writing 2.8 3.8 — 2.4 2.0 3.1 F 0.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 18. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.9 37.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.0 0.8 — 3.8 2.3 6.5 — Math 2.1 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.1 — 6.1 4.9 3.2 2.7 2.0 32.6 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — F 0.4 q 2.8 — Math 2.9 3.0 2.7 3.3 2.6 2.9 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.9 5 4.7 5.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. of $60.5 2.3 Tests not written (%) 1.9 3.7 — Writing 2. inc.2 M 0.4 2.6 2.2 6. of $58.7 Overall rank: 147/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.4 F 0.7 n/a Math 2.0 — 6.3 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.9 2.6 — 2.9 Math F 0.6 2.9 2.2 F 0.5 2.4 4.5 8.3 3.900: 2.6 2.0 36.5 — Math 2.6 2.0 0.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.9 — Gr 6 avg.3 2.5 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 1.8 2.4 — Writing 2.4 F 0.2 2. level: Reading 2.8 — 2.6 19.0 0.5 6.0 0.7 3.400: 3.0 Overall rank: 121/2742 1054/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 2.9 23.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 5.0 — Writing 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 Writing 2.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 27.0 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 43.2 3.9 2.0 Gr 6 avg.6 4.6 2.3 0.5 28.7 — Math 3. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 1556/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 4.6 — .6 Writing 2.0 5.7 2.3 3.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.2 — 26.5 2.7 2.8 3.9 38.3 6.5 36.2 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 0.7 3.2 M 0.7 30.6 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.7 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.5 2.3 — 5.0 Special needs (%): 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 5.0 p Math 3.8 2. level: Reading 3.3 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 49 Special needs (%): 12.5 2.4 2.7 2.1 Math M 0.7 3.0 Special needs (%): 23.4 2.7 2.5 2.5 20.1 n/a n/a F 0.6 8.9 p 3.3 0.3 2.1 2.8 n/a Writing 2.9 2.3 Math F 0.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 M 0.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 — Teeterville [Public] Teeterville Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 4.8 2. inc.4 F 0. inc.0 0.6 n/a 4.1 — Writing 2.8 2.2 F 0.0 p Tests not written (%) 0.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 6.7 2.9 — Writing 2.5 Math 2.8 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 5.7 2.2 n/a 2.6 2.1 — Math M 0.5 2.5 2.9 8.1 40.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Math F 0.0 2.9 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.9 3.7 2.7 2.0 0.7 2.1 34.2 2.3 46.9 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 2. of $82.9 Overall rank: 2146/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 Writing 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 n/a Math 2. level: Reading 2.3 n/a E n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.0 0. inc.1 — 2.5 3.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 Overall rank: 235/2742 517/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 28.6 2.6 28.3 2.4 q 2.7 — 2.0 30.000: -2.3 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 0.2 4.0 1.7 2.7 0.9 p 2.2 Special needs (%): 12.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.6 5 3.2 M 0.7 2.6 2.8 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 51.6 2.1 St Joseph’s [Catholic] Simcoe ESL (%): 0.7 2.4 2.6 2.8 6.6 2.6 2.0 7.5 2.5 Math 2.5 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 623/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 q Tests below standard (%) 54.2 — 27.1 n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2.8 2.7 6.6 2.7 2.2 p 2.9 3.6 q 3.5 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.8 7.9 Math 3.7 2.8 — 2. inc.6 St Cecilia’s [Catholic] Port Dover Gr 6 enrollment: 17 ESL (%): 0.6 12.8 54.5 2.8 2.6 6.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 879/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.5 E n/a M 0.1 — 1.6 6. inc.7 51.0 3.9 2.8 — Writing 2. of $40. level: Reading 2.1 2. of $59.5 2. inc.1 — F 0.0 0.8 — 2.2 — GREATER ESSEX AREA Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 12.5 n/a 2.9 2.5 3.7 2.6 — 2. of $44.6 2.9 2.7 2.0 2.0 p Gr 6 avg.2 — Writing 2.4 — Writing 2.8 2.2 2.8 An-Noor [Private] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 18 ESL (%): 0.4 2.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 — E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.6 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 5.6 2.5 — 3.1 3.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2.2 3. of $56.7 — Math 2.4 2.8 2.3 5.7 14.0 — Writing 2.3 4.6 2.5 6.8 n/a 2.6 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.900: -0.5 q Writing 2.8 2.8 2.4 F 0.8 2.3 2.8 p St Stephen’s [Catholic] Cayuga Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.2 6.500: 2.4 2.3 n/a n/a Math M 0.9 3.0 16.2 Writing 2.500: -1.9 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 30.5 2.0 3.7 28. of $61.7 33.2 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.4 W F Hewitt [Public] Waterford ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 45.0 3.5 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 3.7 2.1 E M 0.

1 Tests not written (%) 4.4 36.9 2.5 Writing 2.6 2.5 Math 2. of $70.4 39.6 52.9 3.0 — .1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.0 — Math 2.1 2.7 2.4 3.5 2.4 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.7 2.5 2.4 F 0.9 2.1 n/a n/a 35.7 Writing 2.4 13.1 n/a n/a M 0.3 n/a n/a M 0.4 2.6 — 2.3 3.4 2.2 Tests not written (%) 2.8 Christ the King [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.3 Writing 2.0 — 3.400: 0.2 E E F 0.4 — 2.000: 0.6 0.3 Tests below standard (%) 55.2 F 0.8 4.0 0.6 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 2.3 21.7 Gr 6 avg.2 n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2.1 F 0.3 Writing 2.2 Gr 6 avg.7 q Math 2.9 1. of $133.0 2.7 46.7 — Centennial Central [Public] Comber Gr 6 enrollment: 32 ESL (%): 0.7 1.9 — Overall rating out of 10 4.8 Gr 6 avg.7 Math 2.2 2.7 3.0 0.1 M 0.4 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 56.9 3.7 q Writing 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1357/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 3.4 2. of $81.3 46.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.4 3.1 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 50.9 3.7 41.6 2. level: Reading 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.2 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 — 2.4 2.5 n/a 35.2 Tests not written (%) 8.0 Special needs (%): 23.5 q F 0.5 35.4 M 0.0 Special needs (%): 18.0 — 2.4 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.2 n/a n/a F 0.6 q Gr 6 avg.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 23.8 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 9.7 — 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 Writing 2.0 2.7 2.6 5.7 23.3 — 14.9 2.9 3.0 33.9 — 5.9 30.6 2.3 q Tests not written (%) 3. level: Reading 2.3 n/a n/a 49.9 2.4 2.9 2.6 — Math 2.7 2.0 0.8 2.8 — 2. level: Reading 2.6 5.3 0.5 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8 — F 0. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0.6 Tests not written (%) 1.0 3. of $35.9 2.3 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 5.3 2.1 2.6 21.3 Math F 0.5 2.5 2.7 — 2.8 32.100: -1.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 20. of $76. inc.4 Math M 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 45.3 n/a F 0.6 6.4 0.1 — D M Eagle [Public] St Clair Beach ESL (%): 0.1 3.1 F 0.9 5.9 5.9 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.5 2.4 2.5 — 2.1 44.9 3. level: Reading 2.1 2.5 2.4 Tests not written (%) 0.9 3.8 2.8 52.2 7 7.6 3.9 2.6 2.4 Writing 2.7 2.6 F 0.2 37. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 2.2 — 99 Colchester North [Public] Essex Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.4 2.3 — Writing 2.3 0.1 3.6 2. inc.9 Gr 6 avg.3 2.0 0.3 3.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 17.9 — F 0.2 7.3 41.9 2.6 2.6 F 0.4 2.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 3.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 15.6 3.1 7 8 7.9 3.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 0.7 2.7 2.9 Writing 2.6 — 2. of $ n/a: n/a Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 53.2 — 2.5 2.6 — Concord [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.1 — Dr H D Taylor [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 2. of $ n/a: n/a Overall rank: 2311/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 — 2.7 4.7 2.6 3.6 0.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.4 — East Mersea [Public] Wheatley Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 0. inc.9 3.0 p 2.2 4. level: Reading 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.1 3.8 2.3 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.6 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 16.3 — 1.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 10 10 9 9.6 2.0 7.9 10.7 2.3 3.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.3 2.3 n/a F 0.5 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.9 — 11.0 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.5 2.3 2.5 — 2.0 0.0 0.0 — 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 Math 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 19.5 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy Belle River [Public] Belle River ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 2.1 F 0.3 3.2 2.9 2.4 Math 2.9 2. inc.9 2.9 — 3.1 — F 0.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.7 2.6 q 2.6 — 2.3 E M 0.0 q Central [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.1 — Overall rating out of 10 4.4 2.6 2.6 — 2.0 3.3 22.0 0.9 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 2.5 F 0.1 — 0.1 3.9 3.5 2.6 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 48.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.5 2.4 2.1 2.5 F 0.7 2.7 6.2 M 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 7.6 4.0 — 1.8 2.9 Overall rank: 714/2742 571/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Writing 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math M 0.8 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.5 Math 2.0 3.200: -1.8 24.2 — 23. level: Reading 3.6 6.1 — Dougall Avenue [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 19.5 — Math 2.7 2.8 2.3 Tests not written (%) 0. inc.5 7.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.8 4.0 3.7 2.1 n/a E n/a M 0.4 4.3 — Math 3. level: Reading 2.2 M 0.1 5.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 4.5 1. level: Reading 2.5 — 2. of $97.5 6.9 3.600: -3.6 Writing 2.6 2.1 — 2.1 F 0.8 2.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.2 39.8 — 2.3 Writing 2.8 2.8 2.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 2.1 — David Maxwell [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.0 — 2.6 2.8 2.2 n/a F 0.4 3.0 39.6 — 3.7 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 F 0.3 17.9 3.0 2.4 2.8 Math 2. inc.4 2.1 q 2.1 F 0.1 2.3 F 0.3 — 2.6 2.0 0.2 2.0 3.5 2. of $38.8 43.0 — Tests not written (%) 3.0 Special needs (%): 21.700: -2.5 4 5.5 — 2.7 2.4 2.9 Math 3.6 n/a M 0.3 2.4 Math 2.4 2.1 2.6 2.7 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.1 Math 3.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 51 Special needs (%): 27.2 3.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 — 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 51.0 — Tests not written (%) 4.5 Math 2.6 Math 2.9 2.0 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2612/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2.8 2.6 Math 2.2 3.4 2.5 2.3 16.7 2.7 5.3 — Coronation [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.9 — Writing 3.6 Gr 6 avg.2 n/a n/a n/a 49.3 3.6 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1443/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 10.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 667/2742 325/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.8 43.7 4.8 — Writing 2.8 2.7 Math 2.5 n/a Tests below standard (%) 49.5 2.2 4.8 3.7 q Overall rating out of 10 9.2 p Gr 6 avg.0 0.6 — Math 2.5 3.5 — 3.0 q 7. of $63.8 Tests not written (%) 1.2 n/a n/a 34.1 3.2 3.0 Overall rating out of 10 5 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 17.2 2.6 2.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 43.7 2.0 2.3 2.7 — 2.1 n/a 51.0 0.6 — Bellewood [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 4.2 — 7.9 p 2.7 24.5 2.7 2.8 3.5 2.5 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.6 2. level: Reading 2.6 F 0.7 23.2 2. level: Reading 2.1 60. level: Reading 1.2 30.2 n/a F 0.1 — F 0.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 — 2.3 2.2 — F 0.1 2.3 F 0.8 4.6 2.5 2.0 3.3 3.5 2.5 2.3 7.2 Math 2.7 2.3 Tests not written (%) 0.8 — 2.2 0. inc.900: -0. level: Reading 2.8 2.5 2. inc.6 2.8 — 2.1 6.7 3.3 2.8 2.7 2.7 3.7 35.1 F 0.3 45.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1991/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.9 2.0 3.4 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 0.5 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.4 F 0.0 30.1 Math M 0.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.8 1.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 14.5 2. of $50.6 2.8 — 2.2 3.7 2.4 3.4 2.3 1.300: -0.8 2.8 2.8 6.9 4.3 2.4 n/a n/a n/a F 0.5 43.3 2.4 Writing 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 2.4 2.1 3.6 2. inc.0 — 6.2 — 36.0 0.7 — Writing 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 6.5 2.5 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 33.9 — 2.400: 3.0 0.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 52 Special needs (%): 7. level: Reading 2.8 Writing 2.9 — Math 2.3 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.2 2.4 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.1 Tests below standard (%) 44.0 — 5.5 14.2 — 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 29.3 2.6 4.4 2.4 q 2.6 3.4 — E M 0.4 F 0.3 25.9 Overall rank: 1948/2742 1677/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.2 2.7 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 0.6 3. of $79.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 Math 2.9 — 2.5 2.6 Writing 2. of $91. of $93.6 2. inc.5 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 2.1 — Essex [Public] Essex Gr 6 enrollment: 60 ESL (%): 0.6 2.2 Writing 2.1 3.0 3.2 2.7 2.6 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.5 5.5 — 17. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1642/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.3 n/a E n/a Math M 0.6 — 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.4 Overall rank: 2575/2742 2127/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 Tests not written (%) 6.5 5.2 2.5 2.9 5.300: -0.2 Writing 3.5 — 2.5 Writing 2.1 n/a F 0.1 — 5.6 40.300: 0.4 2.3 3. inc.3 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30. of $51.4 Overall rank: 39/2742 18/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.4 4.9 28.1 — 2.1 M 0.3 F 0.4 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 Writing 2.4 2.7 — Math 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 2.1 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 28.5 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4. level: Reading 2.0 5.7 2.9 Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 — M 0.9 — 2.0 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 57. inc.1 — 6.2 2.5 2.0 2.6 Writing 2.1 Overall rank: 1838/2742 2030/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 — Eastwood [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 20.700: -1.6 3.1 n/a Gr 6 enrollment: 40 Special needs (%): 20.8 2.7 2.2 — Writing 3.5 — Writing 2.2 M 0.1 2.9 2.4 — 2.9 3.7 3. inc. inc.100: -0.4 2.5 2.1 — 2.7 2.7 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2.5 2.1 Math M 0.6 Gr 6 avg.0 2.8 2.9 45.7 2.8 p 2.9 2.5 — F 0.4 2.1 — 2.5 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 2.3 2.9 — 4.6 2.4 2.8 32. level: Reading 3.7 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 p 2.2 — Math 3.1 F 0.8 0.2 2.9 2.4 Math 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.0 53.3 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 — Writing 2.6 Math 2.4 2.6 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 2153/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 49.5 2.1 3.6 2.6 Gr 6 avg.8 44. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 2.7 4.5 2. level: Reading 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.7 — E F 0.5 2.

5 Math 2.7 2.8 2.3 — 4.9 30. inc.5 — 3.9 5.3 F 0.7 2.7 2.7 2.1 n/a F 0.1 Math M 0.1 Tests below standard (%) 25.1 6.8 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 — 3.9 2.9 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 2.6 — 2.6 — Math 2.0 2.6 5.0 Special needs (%): 8.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5. of $57.1 M 0.8 q 5.7 3.5 — 3.5 0.4 2.6 — 9.2 3.2 2.2 — 3.1 3.1 3.8 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.8 — 2.4 Writing 2.6 2.9 2.7 — Math 2.3 — Math F 0.8 3.3 3.6 — 2.1 n/a 47.800: -0.4 Writing 2.6 2.1 F 0. inc.5 — Gr 6 avg.9 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.5 n/a F 0.4 2.3 F 0.0 2.3 — Tests not written (%) 1.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.1 E F 0.2 F 0.9 2.4 F 0.2 Math F 0.1 2.5 49.1 Math 3.1 F 0.6 6.9 60. level: Reading 2.5 — 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 74 Special needs (%): 14.8 — F 0.3 4.0 9. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.3 4.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 Tests below standard (%) 34.3 q 40.2 Math 3.7 2.2 p 2.9 — 2.7 3.2 — Gosfield North Central [Public] Cottam Gr 6 enrollment: 64 ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.0 3.1 Math F 0.4 2.9 2.4 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 3.9 2.6 Math 2.7 2. inc.6 2.0 3.5 q F 0.6 19.5 Writing 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.3 2.1 — E M 0. of $105.6 q 2.7 — 3. of $25.3 3.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 2.9 2.0 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 46 Special needs (%): 15.6 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.9 2.4 2.6 2.4 49.1 p Overall rating out of 10 2.7 — 2.4 F 0.0 3.5 — Gr 6 avg.7 2.0 — Glenwood [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.1 E n/a n/a M 0.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.2 13.6 Gr 6 avg. of $61.8 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.0 Writing 3.9 4.5 2.6 51.7 2.9 2.3 M 0.6 — F 0.3 Math 2.5 2.0 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.9 3.0 0.6 2.2 6 5. of $76.1 2.9 — Writing 2.0 2.3 Math M 0.1 2.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.4 2.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a 32.7 3.3 4.4 2.5 q Math F 0.8 3.2 q 9.2 Tests not written (%) 1.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.8 2.0 1.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.5 — 2.6 Writing 2.0 0.4 2.4 F 0.5 2.6 3.8 p 14.4 0.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 3.0 3.7 2.000: -0. level: Reading 1.3 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Writing 2.6 Math F 0.5 2.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.2 2.6 — Immaculate Conception [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 46 ESL (%): 30. level: Reading 3. of $27.4 — 2.6 — Math 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.7 36.9 Writing 2.1 Math 2.8 Gr 6 avg.6 Overall rank: 2183/2742 1804/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.5 46.6 2.4 F 0.6 — Holy Name [Catholic] Essex ESL (%): 0.3 — F 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 626/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 2.9 0.3 45.4 2.5 2.1 2.1 n/a F 0.3 7.3 2. inc.8 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 3.4 — 7. inc.7 — 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 4.7 2.4 25.7 — Writing 2.2 F 0.2 — .8 5.1 27.6 7.2 4.1 Tests below standard (%) 42.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1777/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2.5 — Hugh Beaton [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.3 F 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 7 Gr 6 enrollment: 66 Special needs (%): 13.5 5.1 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.5 2.9 Writing 3.4 Math 2.3 E F 0.7 2.7 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 5.7 q 3. level: Reading 2.6 — H J Lassaline [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 5.7 Math 2.5 2.7 n/a n/a F 0.700: -0.0 2.5 Tests not written (%) 1.1 F 0.1 Overall rank: 2146/2742 1767/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Math M 0.0 2.8 5.4 42.5 Math 2.4 28.3 — 4.8 3.4 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 95 Special needs (%): 12.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 E p 22.9 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 30 Special needs (%): 3.2 2.6 2.1 33.9 Math 2.5 — Writing 2.1 7.4 2.5 2.2 — Holy Cross [Catholic] LaSalle ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.0 — 3.1 Math 2.5 2.8 Math 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 — M 0.5 2.1 2.3 5.7 5.7 Writing 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2183/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.9 3.6 2.000: 0.7 — 2.6 2.8 2.5 2. of $79.9 2.7 — 2.5 — 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 24.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 53.4 38.9 — 2.8 49.5 2.6 2.5 21.1 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.8 2.0 3.6 2.4 — Math 2.8 2.7 5.3 2.4 0.100 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Forest Glade [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.2 34.6 2.3 F 0.6 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.100: -0.1 2.7 2.0 Tests not written (%) 3.4 Special needs (%): 21.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.4 2.8 — 2.3 2.8 — 2.3 F 0.7 Math F 0.2 2.0 Tests not written (%) 18.5 5.1 5.1 4.1 3.6 q 3.0 — Math 2.1 — Writing 2.3 Math M 0.8 2.5 2.9 8.7 — 0.1 2.100: -1.1 F 0. inc.4 F 0.1 57.5 Tests not written (%) 3.7 2.5 Writing 2.8 5.0 2. of $81.6 2 3.9 3.1 3.9 46.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 Overall rank: 2660/2742 2308/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 15.6 — 23.4 2.4 8.7 Gr 6 avg.6 2.9 p 2.9 2.2 Writing 2.0 37.7 2.7 2.1 — 26.8 Math 3.1 Overall rating out of 10 4.9 — 3.7 — 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 Math 2. of $53.3 Overall rating out of 10 2.6 2.4 2.2 — M 0.7 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 47.5 40.3 — Tests below standard (%) 63.2 7.9 2.9 3.9 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 39.4 20. level: Reading 2.7 2.4 — 2.3 16.6 2.9 3. inc.1 6.0 Special needs (%): 4.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 F 0.0 0.4 44.6 2.9 2.4 2.3 F 0.8 2.2 — E M 0.5 2.7 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 3.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 15.8 2.1 F 0.1 — 7.4 2.2 40.6 6.1 E F 0.6 2.6 0.1 2.6 0.6 — 2.9 Writing 2. of $57.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.5 F 0.5 25.0 52.1 2.1 E n/a n/a 24.9 3.5 2.0 2.6 — 2. level: Reading 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 37 Special needs (%): 13.8 25.3 2.1 M 0.5 2.1 F 0.5 17.4 2.8 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 7.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 20.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.9 Gr 6 enrollment: 62 Special needs (%): 21.6 2.1 E F 0.4 4.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 Math 2.3 q 44.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 — Math 2.5 — 2.3 2.2 — Writing 2.9 Gr 6 avg.2 2.2 Math M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.2 28.0 1. inc.1 3.1 1.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 47.9 2.3 — 2.6 2.100: 1.0 Gr 6 avg.2 — 2.9 Gr 6 avg.100: -0.3 2.5 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 212/2742 363/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2.7 2.9 p 2.800: -1.7 — 2.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 p 2.8 q F 0.6 2.7 Writing 2.500: -3. inc.1 2.4 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 13.2 3.7 M 0.2 — F 0.2 5.9 — 2.8 5.0 Gr 6 avg.6 2.5 F 0.3 4.6 2.8 2.8 2.5 Writing 2.4 2.8 Math 3.4 5.4 1.9 2.4 2.6 5.4 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.3 Gr 6 avg.8 2.9 — 4.5 Math 2.1 2.9 3.0 — F 0.7 37.5 — Writing 2.4 2.4 — Math 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 10.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.7 2.0 2.9 2.2 0.4 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 6.8 Writing 2.6 — 2.1 39.900: -0.4 0.8 — 3. of $41.6 2.6 — F 0.4 Gr 6 avg.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1285/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.3 0.0 2.6 q M 0.9 2.6 2.7 2.6 — Writing 2.6 3. level: Reading 1.1 2.8 — 7. level: Reading 2.1 1.5 2.7 — 2.4 — 4.4 6.800: -1. level: Reading 2.4 2.7 6.8 2.0 2.7 — 1.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a F 0.3 2.2 n/a F 0.2 3.1 — 3.5 2.1 41.3 42.8 Math 2.6 Tests below standard (%) 46.6 3.6 2.2 3.6 2.7 — 3.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 2.4 F 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 7.1 2.8 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.5 M 0.7 q Georges P Vanier [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 24 ESL (%): 0.1 — 2.4 1.1 65.4 2.6 — 2.0 2.1 Overall rank: 1991/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 M 0.7 2.4 Tests not written (%) 7.3 2.8 2.9 2.7 — 2.9 — 4.6 — 2.8 2.1 Writing 2.8 Tests not written (%) 5.5 Math 2.4 6.0 3.8 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.5 2.9 Math 2.5 2. inc.600: 1.3 M 0.8 Math 2.0 — 7 8.5 2.6 2.2 4.5 2.7 2. of $86.5 30.2 33.400: -1.6 q General Brock [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.8 — 4.3 2.0 3.9 2.0 1.4 37.5 Harrow [Public] Harrow ESL (%): 1.8 43.3 — Writing 2.1 2.5 2.6 39.3 F 0.5 2.4 41.1 Tests below standard (%) 31.5 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.5 52.2 4.0 1.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1970/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 2. inc.6 2.2 Tests not written (%) 4.5 Writing 2.9 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 41.5 2.8 Writing 2.5 — J A McWilliam [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.7 Math 2.0 2.6 2.1 2.6 26.7 — Math 2.9 2.7 2.8 Writing 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 2.0 3. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 — 8.8 10.4 F 0.2 — 3.7 2.3 2.2 — Gordon McGregor [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 0.4 2.8 2.2 n/a F 0.1 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.1 2.4 23.7 — 6.500: 2.9 0. level: Reading 2.3 M 0.1 p 51. level: Reading 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 71. inc.0 3.1 3. of $67.2 3.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 28.1 2.9 p F 0.9 Writing 2.8 3. inc.6 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 — 2.7 2.1 F 0.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 F 0.0 20.7 q 2.3 7.7 q 2.8 30.6 5. of $90. of $21.9 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Gr 6 avg.0 2.6 2.3 — Gr 6 avg.3 2.2 Tests not written (%) 6. level: Reading 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.7 41.6 2.1 15. inc.5 n/a n/a 13.0 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 58.3 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 29 Special needs (%): 13.2 F 0.1 3.7 — Frank W Begley [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 13.9 2. level: Reading 2.3 13.0 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 — F 0.5 2.8 2.7 — 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1610/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — 2.1 — 7.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.9 2.9 Writing 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.1 E — Tests below standard (%) 37.8 5.1 2.5 F 0.5 2.4 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1655/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 — E F 0.5 40.4 p Gore Hill [Public] Leamington ESL (%): 13.5 2.5 3.0 — 5.7 2.5 — 2. level: Reading 1.7 4.7 — 2.6 F 0.1 E M 0. level: Reading 2.1 18.0 2.5 1.5 — 2.1 3.2 7.5 6.3 Tests not written (%) 5.7 Tests not written (%) 6.7 1.7 7.1 5.2 F 0.6 2.7 — F 0.8 — 3.5 2.

4 2.7 2.4 2.4 Writing 2.4 0.1 3.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 23.0 Writing 2.4 2.2 E — F 0.9 0.7 2.3 44.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 2.8 2.1 — 55.7 2.5 7.3 Tests not written (%) 0.2 Writing 2.8 2.7 2.8 39.0 2.1 n/a Marlborough [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 5.8 2.6 2.1 3.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 — Writing 2.2 23.6 2.5 Math 2. level: Reading 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.5 9. inc.4 2.4 — 3.7 2.6 2.3 3.8 — Math 3.3 F 0.3 2.5 2.0 3.1 n/a M 0.6 37. level: Reading 2.1 n/a F 0.8 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 8.7 7 6 5.9 2.9 — Writing 2.6 — 2.2 — Monseigneur Jean Noël [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.2 n/a n/a 42. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 3.4 2.6 — 1.9 2.0 — 6.9 Overall rank: 295/2742 46/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 57.9 Writing 2.2 Overall rank: 2226/2742 2057/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 Special needs (%): 13.8 4 2 4.8 40.9 p Math 2.7 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 0.9 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 6.3 — 2.5 q 8. level: Reading 2.6 2.4 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 26.9 2.4 Math 2.2 9.8 44.2 2.9 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 M 0.1 7.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.3 — F 0.2 — Tests not written (%) 3.2 36.1 Math M 0.7 6.0 2.7 2.1 3.0 0.7 M 0.5 — 2.0 0.6 — 2.9 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.300: 1.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 37.9 2.0 — Math 2.8 — Math 2.8 2.1 — Writing 2.3 F 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 2.0 0.3 3.0 3.2 1.6 — Math 2.4 2.0 Writing 2.1 Writing 3.6 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 3.5 2.6 2.9 2.8 39.1 F 0.5 2.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.4 — Writing 3.2 F 0.6 — Gr 6 avg.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 4 Gr 6 enrollment: 38 Special needs (%): 15.6 — 5.4 2.0 2.6 6.1 0.9 — 2.1 F 0. of $102.700: -1.6 7.6 2.1 Overall rank: 667/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.8 7.6 2.1 3.2 — Tests below standard (%) 30.7 2.9 — F 0.7 2.1 n/a Math M 0.4 2.3 M 0.6 2.9 3.6 p 2.2 3. level: Reading 2.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.7 2.5 6. level: Reading 2.2 7.500: -1. level: Reading 3.9 Writing 2.9 2.4 1.8 2.9 7.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.2 3.0 5.0 Special needs (%): 13.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — Writing 2.3 2.6 50.2 — Math F 0.1 2.2 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.6 2.8 2.3 5.2 41.7 2.4 M 0.9 — Writing 2. level: Reading 2.4 E n/a M 0.6 2.9 5.5 Math 2.2 2.8 5.6 2.7 2.1 2.8 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 57.6 F 0. inc.7 2.4 — 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 20.7 16.0 — 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math F 0.8 — 7.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 2153/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2.5 — 5.7 2.9 3.7 1.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.7 29.2 Math 2.2 3.1 17.6 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.7 q 3.2 Writing 2.6 2.3 2.4 q 4.5 2.2 2.7 1.2 Tests below standard (%) 37.3 2.9 q 2.3 3.4 37. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.2 — 2.4 5.4 2. inc.5 2.5 2.2 0.4 — Monseigneur Augustin Caron [Catholic] LaSalleGr 6 enrollment: 47 ESL (%): 0.5 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.2 2.2 E — 27.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.2 n/a F 0.0 0.9 24.3 F 0.6 — 2.4 Gr 6 avg.6 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.5 3. level: Reading 3.5 3.6 — .1 Overall rating out of 10 6 Gr 6 enrollment: 44 Special needs (%): 18.5 4.5 E — Math F 0.9 5.3 49.2 M 0.4 2.8 Tests not written (%) 1.8 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.1 q Math 3.7 2.9 2.1 2.100: -1.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.4 52.4 Math F 0.2 Tests not written (%) 2.6 47.7 1.4 — 1.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 3.8 2.8 2.9 1.8 q Math 3.2 2.6 2.2 5.6 35.6 q Tests not written (%) 3.2 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 Math 3.1 3.7 2.8 — 2.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2367/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 p Jack Miner [Public] Kingsville ESL (%): 0.9 2.3 2.0 2. of $55.4 Writing 2.7 2.1 F 0.9 3.5 — F 0.1 Math 3.2 Writing 2.2 — 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 72 Special needs (%): 11.5 2.7 Math 3.9 — Math 3.2 Tests below standard (%) 50.6 — 2.0 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 25.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 34.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.7 — 2. level: Reading 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 9.1 M 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 3.0 3.2 57.4 4.5 6.4 — F 0.8 36.8 7.7 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.2 2.5 3. of $50. of $96.1 F 0.5 Math 2. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.5 37.2 2.7 2.0 22.5 55.9 2.2 3.1 7. of $50.7 2.2 F 0.4 Gr 6 avg.8 3.2 30.5 35.1 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 8.5 2.100: -1.3 6.1 — E M 0.2 — Writing 3.0 2.4 8.7 — Math 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 37.0 0.7 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 35 Special needs (%): 25.5 2.4 4.1 3.8 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 14.6 q 2.7 2.8 2.9 q LaSalle [Public] LaSalle ESL (%): 0.7 52.4 3.6 2. level: Reading 2.0 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 Overall rank: 2226/2742 1898/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.8 — Writing 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 — 2.1 3.7 2.6 0.7 2.4 7.1 35.6 1.3 F 0.7 2.7 2.2 M 0.5 2.0 3.0 25.3 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 2.4 0.5 — F 0.0 2.1 1.7 45.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 43. of $80.5 2.5 10 9.8 2.3 Writing 2.4 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 73 Special needs (%): 13.1 Writing 2. inc.0 2.9 p Tests not written (%) 2.0 1.7 2.6 — E E F 0.8 Tests not written (%) 3.7 2. inc. level: Reading 1.4 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 43.7 2.2 3.1 — 42.6 5.3 22.1 3. inc.6 2.5 2.0 Special needs (%): 20.7 2.3 — 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 101 J E Benson [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 13.1 3.5 2.9 6.3 — Margaret D Bennie [Public] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.6 2.1 F 0.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.0 29.1 M 0.3 33. level: Reading 2. of $78.8 — Math 2.9 2.1 3.6 3.2 0.4 F 0. of $24.5 29.5 M 0.1 Overall rank: 1357/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 3.8 2.4 4.5 Math 2.3 F 0.5 — 2.2 F 0.6 2.4 2.3 3.2 M 0.0 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.900: -0.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 F 0.5 3.8 2.6 — 2.8 2.7 3.0 4.4 4.1 n/a F 0.1 — 2.6 2.7 2.5 Math 2.3 25.0 3.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.1 6.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 4.5 1.1 q 7.7 2.8 0.2 3.1 n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.2 n/a 65.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.000: 2.8 2.4 — F 0.500: 0.2 F 0.4 2.0 — L A Desmarais [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.5 5. inc.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 n/a F 0. inc.5 2.7 — Writing 2.2 2.0 2.4 — King Edward [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.0 3. level: Reading 3.5 2.9 2.4 2.0 6.5 Math 2.8 — 3.1 2.7 — 1.3 F 0.100: -1.2 n/a n/a F 0. level: Reading 3.5 3.0 Special needs (%): 7.2 37.7 — M S Hetherington [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 0.1 2.5 2.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2342/2742 2239/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 1.2 F 0.0 2.1 M 0.2 Gr 6 avg.7 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.0 Special needs (%): 31.7 2.0 3.5 — Writing 2.000: -1.3 — 7 6.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.8 2.5 — Tests not written (%) 8.9 3.1 2.7 2.9 Math 3.8 30.6 2.1 M 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 — Tests not written (%) 2.3 q M 0.4 15.3 8.1 Math M 0.8 5.8 — 2.6 2.1 3.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.4 Math 2.6 — Writing 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.2 F 0.6 Gr 6 avg.9 2.1 2. inc.1 F 0.3 M 0.7 2.3 n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1599/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 — 2. level: Reading 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 16.1 3.4 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2.3 3.2 2.8 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2. inc.2 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 3.6 3.5 2.200: -0.1 4.7 2.9 4.9 2.7 5 4.4 Overall rank: 623/2742 363/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 2.1 6.1 2.2 — Writing 3.3 Writing 2.5 2.2 — 21.2 F 0.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.4 2.3 2.6 2. inc.3 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — F 0.6 2.0 8.4 n/a n/a M 0.7 2.4 — Writing 2.7 — 1. level: Reading 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Math 2.3 2.4 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 4.0 7.5 E F 0.4 2.6 20.1 21.4 F 0.9 2.7 2.1 — 2.9 2. inc.7 2.5 6.700: 1.1 n/a F 0.1 2.0 0.5 — Math 2.3 n/a n/a 30.5 2.5 2.7 — 2.7 5.5 2.3 q Malden Central [Public] Amherstburg Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.0 — Gr 6 avg.200: -0.9 2.8 q 2.6 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.4 3.8 — 5.8 2.5 — 1.6 q 2.9 2.8 9.6 2.5 2.8 Special needs (%): 13.4 2.6 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a E n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.7 2.0 2.4 3.8 — Writing 2.4 11.0 1.0 Tests not written (%) 2.3 M 0.6 — Math 2. of $80.6 2.8 2.7 2.6 3.9 2.1 n/a Math E F 0.0 1.4 n/a M 0.4 2.7 2.7 6.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.9 Gr 6 avg.6 2.9 7.4 — 0.3 29.0 3.0 Gr 6 avg.4 — 2.6 2.3 3.3 2.8 2.1 F 0.7 2.5 2.7 2.3 4.4 5. of $27. of $79.7 2.300: 1.3 4.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2146/2742 1767/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.7 2.1 F 0.8 — Tests not written (%) 1. level: Reading 2.4 2.3 5.4 Overall rank: 235/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 n/a F 0.3 F 0.2 — Lakeshore Discovery [Public] Emeryville Gr 6 enrollment: 83 ESL (%): 0.3 Gr 6 avg.4 39.4 3.4 Math E Tests below standard (%) 53. level: Reading 2.9 — 2.1 E F 0.8 2.2 3.1 F 0.2 2.1 45. inc.0 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 46.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 30.5 2.8 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 48.2 q Math 3. of $84.0 2.1 n/a F 0.8 2.4 2.3 F 0.2 0.3 M 0.8 — 3.5 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 4.1 n/a F 0.6 — Mill Street Centennial [Public] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 37 ESL (%): 10.2 q Kingsville [Public] Kingsville ESL (%): 6.4 46.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.3 F 0.4 F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0. of $64. of $66.5 2. of $68.6 2.8 2.0 2.700: -0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1038/2742 1054/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 2. level: Reading 3.9 3.0 Special needs (%): 7.4 Writing 2.2 2. inc.5 2.5 John Campbell [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.0 Special needs (%): 28.2 7.7 2.5 Tests not written (%) 0.7 2.5 2.4 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 30.8 5.

2 F 0.3 22.600: 1. of $93.2 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 0.9 18.0 2.0 3.4 — Overall rating out of 10 4.9 2.2 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2122/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 3.5 6 3.6 2.3 7 4.3 F 0.4 2.6 — Writing 2.1 2.9 — Math 2. level: Reading 2.4 Tests below standard (%) 35. level: Reading 2.0 2.9 3.7 2.6 5.5 2.6 2.2 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1312/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.1 0.9 2.2 — 43.7 2.3 2.5 6.6 42.9 q Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 31.2 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 Writing 2.5 3.6 2.2 E M 0. inc.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 18.7 38.1 2.0 Special needs (%): 6.6 17.5 2.3 F 0.8 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 28.1 Overall rating out of 10 2.0 — Math 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.1 2.7 2.1 n/a F 0.5 8.8 2.3 — Writing 2.3 — Math E M 0.7 2.8 7.5 F 0.3 — Princess Elizabeth [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.5 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 n/a n/a Math M 0.6 2.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 6.1 F 0.6 2.6 Math 2.100: -1.8 3.8 2.6 3.7 Overall rank: 295/2742 278/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — Writing 2.5 5.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 9.7 2.8 2.2 n/a 2.2 3.0 3.9 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.1 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 2.1 F 0.7 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.9 Tests not written (%) 1.4 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 21.0 q 4.2 2.9 2.0 — F 0. inc.2 — Gr 6 avg.3 2.9 2.5 — Math M 0. level: Reading 2.5 2. of $50.3 2.7 2.8 2. inc.7 2. of $92.9 Writing 2.9 Tests not written (%) 0.6 2.3 F 0.8 — Queen Elizabeth [Public] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 55 ESL (%): 7.2 F 0. level: Reading 3.8 3.5 2.2 — 2.9 20.6 — Math 2.8 2.6 7.4 n/a Tests not written (%) 0.4 24.3 2.7 2.2 F 0. of $40.4 2.8 Overall rank: 2075/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.2 6 5.1 7.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 14.2 F 0.8 2.3 2.9 3.9 27.1 — Gr 6 avg.3 F 0.8 2.0 0.3 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.1 — 4.6 2.9 2.2 2.1 n/a n/a M 0.0 0.8 — 3.3 2.9 2.0 3.5 2.4 0.9 3. of $29.0 n/a 2.2 22.6 27.5 2.0 3.2 27.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 — Northwood [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 3.9 3.2 — F 0.8 — 3.7 — Percy P McCallum [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 4. inc.6 3.5 — F 0.5 2.0 n/a 1.8 2.5 2.0 n/a 38.8 — Math 2. inc.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 623/2742 461/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 E F 0.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 2.8 2.4 2.800: 0.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 5.7 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.9 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.1 2.1 — 30.6 2.0 Writing 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 21.6 q Writing 2.700: 0.8 2.7 Gr 6 avg.1 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.6 53.5 2.4 2.4 7.0 — Writing 2.8 36.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.500: 1.7 2.1 — Math F 0.7 2.7 — 2.2 Gr 6 avg.6 0.7 2.9 2. level: Reading 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 2.2 — Our Lady of Mount Carmel [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 52 ESL (%): 0.7 2.3 Math 2.2 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 18.2 Math M 0.4 2.7 2.2 F 0.7 2.3 Math 2.4 3.5 — 2.8 2.8 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 0.4 2.7 3.5 0.1 p Gr 6 avg.3 — Overall rating out of 10 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 2. level: Reading 2.5 — 2.2 F 0.900: 1.3 — Prince Edward [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 4.7 2.7 — Math 2. of $59.2 2.6 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1719/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 2.0 3.8 2.9 3.3 2.1 2.1 — 2.7 — Tests not written (%) 0.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 — 2.7 — 2.1 25. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 1.3 6.6 2.6 0.0 3. level: Reading 2.3 2.5 — Our Lady of Perpetual Help [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 2.9 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 5.1 F 0.3 M 0.3 Special needs (%): 19.500: -0.1 2.8 1.4 31.8 2.2 M 0.4 F 0.0 3.7 2.4 2.7 2.3 4.5 2.4 2.9 6.4 — 6. level: Reading 2.1 — Writing 2.5 2.8 3.0 Gr 6 avg.1 M 0.7 Writing 2.9 2.9 39.7 2.1 Writing 2.5 2.6 5.3 1.3 — Tests not written (%) 13.6 2.7 3.8 — 2.5 2.6 p Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 58.3 27.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 65.6 2.7 2.9 2.0 n/a 2.9 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 2.3 E M 0.7 2.4 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.0 36.2 — 7.9 p 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 — M 0.1 4.7 2.2 28.7 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 n/a F 0. level: Reading 2.7 1.7 2.8 — Writing 2.5 3.8 q 6.7 Gr 6 avg.1 40.4 E F 0.6 3.300: -0.4 n/a Writing 2.8 42.9 n/a Queen of Peace [Catholic] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 61 ESL (%): 3.0 Special needs (%): 11.0 2.9 — Overall rating out of 10 4.2 4.9 3.5 2.3 Overall rank: 1610/2742 1719/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 2.7 6 5.7 2.6 2.8 — 2.7 2.6 3.9 0.9 3.7 2.1 Math E Tests below standard (%) 24.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 511/2742 688/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 3.1 2.1 F 0.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 — Math 3.6 3.6 — 0.400: -0.9 q Tests not written (%) 5.1 1.8 3.7 26.8 8.8 — Math 2.8 25.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.7 2.5 n/a Math 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.3 n/a Math M 0. of $80.2 2.1 7.7 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 18.6 — Math 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.900: -0.1 q Writing 2.7 2.4 p Tests not written (%) 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 46.9 41.8 2. level: Reading 2.0 38. inc.7 3.2 F 0.2 2.9 2.5 2.3 5.5 2.8 — Math 3.8 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.3 27.9 Tests not written (%) 0.1 8.0 2.0 — Writing 3. level: Reading 2.500: -2.7 2.4 38.2 7.5 F 0.4 — Tests below standard (%) 22. level: Reading 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 39.5 n/a 2.3 n/a M 0.1 5.8 2.8 2.7 27.0 — Math 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 77 Special needs (%): 9. of $70.4 2. level: Reading 2.9 — F 0.7 — F 0.2 — 2.9 2.0 2.1 — Pavillon des Jeunes [Catholic] Belle Rivière Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.3 E F 0.5 3.1 25.3 36.8 3.3 F 0.7 — Notre Dame [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 0.8 33.8 6. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 2.3 p Oakwood [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 33.2 M 0.1 2.2 2.0 1.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 20 Special needs (%): 15.5 2.6 2.9 — Math 3.4 0.7 3.1 2.4 Math 2.9 — Writing 2.7 1.6 6.8 2.8 2.4 49.3 4. of $49.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5. of $59.8 2.8 2.3 — 23.8 2.2 F 0.0 0.7 2.4 2.9 2. inc.8 2.8 — 2.7 2. inc.8 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.3 — 2.5 — Gr 6 avg.4 — Writing 2.3 n/a F 0.9 2.3 2.0 p 2.0 p Math 2.9 3.2 F 0.9 3.1 2.5 n/a Gr 6 avg.1 3.1 2. level: Reading 2.4 7.0 1.2 2. of $51.3 F 0.0 3.6 36.3 5.7 q Math 3.4 — Writing 2.8 — Writing 2.0 35.3 2.2 3.4 2. of $77.4 F 0.8 2.3 2.3 — 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7 6.8 2.2 3.9 5.2 20.300: 0.0 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.7 5.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.7 — 2.7 2.4 23.8 — Gr 6 avg.9 6.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0. inc. level: Reading 2.8 0.4 2.2 — Tests not written (%) 2.7 — 2.3 Math F 0.8 34.8 2.6 41.9 17.6 n/a 2.9 2.0 3.4 2.3 5 4.6 — 2. inc.8 1.6 2.5 2.1 M 0.0 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.4 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.100: 1.5 2.0 0.9 2.7 2.2 Tests not written (%) 1.4 27.8 p 2. level: Reading 2.0 0.7 n/a Writing 2.9 6.7 3.2 2.5 Overall rank: 1215/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2. inc. level: Reading 2.0 27.9 — Math 2.1 M 0.3 6.7 2.1 3.8 0. inc.6 — Math 2.3 F 0.3 28.6 2. inc.4 — 6.4 2.8 — Writing 2.4 — 0.0 Special needs (%): 16.2 Overall rank: 475/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.8 n/a Math 3.2 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.9 2.7 Gr 6 avg.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 2.1 M 0.4 E — F 0.7 6.6 2.1 F 0.8 7.8 26.3 Overall rank: 2393/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 Overall rank: 964/2742 1251/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 2.500: -0.1 6.1 — Math 3.5 n/a n/a 47.3 — Math F 0.2 — 4.5 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 2.0 2.9 0.0 2.1 n/a 5.7 p Math 2.9 40.0 Special needs (%): 8.1 2.7 Math 2.1 M 0. of $78.0 Special needs (%): 10.6 2.2 3.3 6.6 3.6 3.7 2.7 — .4 2. of $62.7 4.6 2.3 Overall rank: 2262/2742 1856/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.8 4.5 2.8 — F 0.8 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.5 n/a F 0.8 4.8 3.7 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 2.7 33.8 — Writing 2.7 — Writing 2.9 Math 3.7 3.9 37.8 36.4 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 9.6 3. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 n/a M 0.6 2.5 2.5 — 2.9 7 7.8 2.3 — Parkview [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.5 5.0 — 3.7 2.5 Writing 2.1 5.0 2.3 Special needs (%): 23.5 2.4 2.8 2.7 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 6.6 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 32.7 2.8 2.6 39.2 F 0.8 2.9 — F 0.3 F 0.8 3.7 3.102 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 Mount Carmel Blytheswood [Public] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0. level: Reading 2.2 Overall rank: 1285/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) 50.7 2.1 M 0.3 F 0.3 Math 2.6 2.6 Writing 2.3 27.0 3.8 43. inc.7 — Math 3.8 2.7 2. inc.1 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.0 0.7 Tests not written (%) 7.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 3.3 F 0.1 2.8 3.6 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.5 2.5 Writing 2.3 Special needs (%): 6.7 Overall rank: 2035/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.4 M 0.3 2.1 3.6 6.8 Math 2.6 2.7 n/a F 0.4 Writing 2.6 2.8 q Our Lady of Lourdes [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 19 ESL (%): 0.0 Special needs (%): 8.2 n/a F 0.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 Math 2.5 2.6 — Prince Andrew [Public] LaSalle ESL (%): 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 6.9 1.1 E — 27. level: Reading 2.9 p 2.100: 0.1 M 0.7 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.4 7.5 7.9 n/a 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.8 — 2. level: Reading 3.1 2.5 Math 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.2 6.3 52.4 F 0.6 2.0 0. of $71.5 — Writing 2.8 — 2.5 — Writing 2.

9 — Writing 3.5 — 6.3 6. level: Reading 2.2 31.5 3.7 Gr 6 avg.7 0.5 2.9 — Sainte-Thérèse [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 23 ESL (%): 4.6 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.8 — Math 2.7 — Math 3.9 33. of $42.7 2.4 — 2.8 2.1 Math 3.5 38.9 2.2 3.7 3.1 M 0.8 2.8 2.5 2.1 3.2 44.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1886/2742 1383/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2226/2742 1938/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 2.2 — Gr 6 avg.7 42.4 — 2.2 28.0 — 0.9 q 4.6 2.2 Overall rank: 2393/2742 688/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.9 0.4 n/a E F 0.2 3.7 2.8 2.7 29.0 3.8 2.000: -0.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1499/2742 1196/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.6 2.4 2.4 F 0.8 2.2 E F 0.3 p 0.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.3 3.2 F 0.9 2.5 6.7 31.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 14.0 4.7 — 7.3 20.1 — E E F 0. level: Reading 2.7 3.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.7 M 0.8 2.1 F 0.6 37.3 0.8 Tests not written (%) 2.2 Tests below standard (%) 36.7 2.7 — 3.4 2.0 — F 0.8 2.3 2.0 Special needs (%): 10.1 Math M 0.9 2.5 Tests not written (%) 4.9 6.6 2.6 M 0.7 p 2.0 — St Anne [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 30 ESL (%): 3.9 18.6 3.9 25.5 2.7 Tests not written (%) 2.5 — 2.2 — Overall rating out of 10 5.6 q 1. of $68.6 — 2.1 3.1 — 14.7 — Tests not written (%) 11.5 — 1.6 — 2.0 2.1 E — 32.0 3.7 — 2.8 n/a n/a 2.2 Tests not written (%) 3.4 2.4 — 5.8 2.9 — 2.8 4.300: 2.6 2.5 — 8.8 2.7 2. inc.9 2.8 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1723/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2. inc.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 Overall rating out of 10 6.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.7 3.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.2 3.1 2.8 1.5 — 2. level: Reading 3.5 3.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 8.5 Math 2.0 48.6 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.5 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 19.0 2.3 — E F 0.0 n/a n/a 3.5 8.3 2.6 1.7 3.3 Math F 0. level: Reading 2.2 E M 0.8 3.0 Special needs (%): 14.1 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a M 0.0 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 33.9 — Saint-Jean-Baptiste [Catholic] Amherstburg Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.4 — 4.7 — Math 3.9 Math 2.9 5.8 — 2.8 2.8 4.7 Writing 2.7 — 3.9 Writing 2.8 2.9 n/a n/a 2.2 4.8 p F 0. inc.1 Overall rating out of 10 6.3 23.1 M 0.0 2.7 2. inc.0 3.2 2.4 n/a Gr 6 avg.0 2.8 2.5 1.0 2.0 0.6 — 2.4 Math 2.8 55.1 Math 2.7 2.8 6. inc.3 Writing 2.8 6 5.8 2.0 3.9 2.9 — F 0.0 — 3.4 — F 0. level: Reading 3.8 0.7 27.9 0.0 3.9 54.8 — 2.5 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2035/2742 1499/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 16.5 E F 0.7 2.3 — 44.1 7.2 3.4 2.8 — 13.3 2.9 47.600: -1.0 n/a Overall rating out of 10 6.0 3.4 2.1 21.8 2.8 Gr 6 enrollment: 45 Special needs (%): 13. inc.1 — Writing 2.5 3.8 Math 2.4 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.3 5.6 2.4 — 31.5 2.3 — 2.3 2.7 3.4 3.0 7.7 3.400: 0.1 Overall rank: 147/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 2.1 8 7.6 — 3. level: Reading 2.0 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.600: 3.8 — 2.5 — 2.0 0.0 — Math 2.8 Overall rating out of 10 4.8 9.000: -0.1 3.8 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 35. of $93.3 Tests not written (%) 1.7 — 2.1 F 0.1 n/a Math 2.8 6.5 2.9 Overall rank: 1991/2742 1196/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 7.1 3.6 2.8 — Writing 2.7 2.0 3.4 29.5 Tests not written (%) 2.9 n/a Math 2.4 10 3.6 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 3.1 44.5 2.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 F 0.2 p Math 3.7 — 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 7.6 6.8 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 n/a St Alexander [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 0.2 3.6 2.2 M 0.7 11.1 19.7 — 2.3 n/a M 0.0 3.7 — Southwood [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.2 3. inc.5 Gr 6 avg.0 1.7 1.6 2.4 — 2.1 n/a 39.5 2.8 46.2 2.7 2.5 2. of $41.1 2.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 103 Queen Victoria [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.1 26.4 Math 2.0 p 2. level: Reading 2. inc.9 — 3.7 3.4 2.4 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.4 Math F 0.5 3.9 25.6 2.5 25.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 438/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2.1 3.7 2.6 2.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.7 7.600: 1.7 Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 Math F 0.3 41.9 2. of $52. level: Reading 2.2 p Gr 6 avg.6 37.5 Writing 2.8 2.3 Tests not written (%) 8.2 1.9 3.1 6.3 2.6 — 2.9 3.9 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.900: 0.1 5. level: Reading 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.4 43.5 7.2 F 0.7 3.7 2.8 2.7 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.2 F 0.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 q Math 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 40.7 Overall rank: 360/2742 738/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 7.4 2.5 2.7 2.5 Writing 2.1 F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 3.2 M 0.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.0 Gr 6 avg.4 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 5.9 47.5 6.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 — Math 2.8 q 2. level: Reading 2.0 3.6 Writing 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 5.6 2.7 2.1 — Writing 3.6 — 2.7 5.9 Writing 2.7 2.7 16.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 57 Special needs (%): 17.5 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 n/a n/a 2.7 p Roseland [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 1. inc.9 2.0 2.7 — 2.2 — 2.1 Writing 2.6 17.5 — 2.5 q F 0.9 — Math 2.6 2.0 3.0 5.1 n/a n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.1 21.3 2.9 p 2.4 2.4 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 Tests not written (%) 5.1 3.7 3.6 22. of $31.5 — 2. level: Reading 2.7 M 0.5 Math 2.7 0.6 Overall rating out of 10 8.7 2.3 — M 0.1 5 7.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.0 3.2 2. of $80.1 3.1 — 2.8 3.3 Overall rank: 1285/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2.200: 0.4 Tests below standard (%) 57.3 2.5 2.1 F 0.9 — Math 2.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 2.9 2.4 Gr 6 avg.7 2.4 n/a M 0.7 Math 2.1 2. of $63.7 — 2.6 n/a n/a 7.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 54.1 2.7 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 8.3 6.1 M 0.2 4.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 9.7 4.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6. level: Reading 2.2 3.2 9.3 M 0.9 Overall rank: 2183/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.4 3.1 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 E F 0.6 2.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2478/2742 2101/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 8.5 2.7 7.1 — M 0.9 — Writing 2.8 2.6 1.2 14.000: -1.0 n/a Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 — Writing 2.0 3.1 2.3 Math M 0.7 2.0 2.6 3.2 2.1 M 0.9 1.0 3.1 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 31.4 3.4 Writing 2.0 Special needs (%): 14. inc.8 3. inc.2 p Writing 2.5 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.2 Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 13.1 — M 0.9 2.1 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.9 2.3 2.6 n/a n/a 2.5 Writing 2.2 — 26. of $100.2 7.5 Gender gap (level): Reading E Math M 0.2 — F 0.2 2.0 Special needs (%): 24.7 2.1 2.9 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.7 — 2.5 3.1 5.8 1.7 Math 2.5 2.5 5.6 2.2 2.9 3. level: Reading 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 F 0.3 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.7 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.0 3.4 Writing 2.2 2.8 Math 2.9 3.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. inc.3 — n/a E n/a M 0.5 3.6 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 — Overall rating out of 10 5.6 3.8 2.6 3.2 F 0.0 — 3.8 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.2 E n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 19.8 n/a Tests not written (%) 3.9 3.1 3.4 2. of $56.6 2.7 q 3.9 Writing 3.4 Overall rank: 295/2742 121/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.6 8.9 — .7 Math 2.9 2.0 n/a Writing 2.1 F 0.4 2.8 — Writing 2.8 2.9 2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.5 F 0.9 — Gr 6 avg.2 F 0.8 — 3.0 3.6 — F 0.7 2.0 1.1 n/a n/a F 0.8 3.7 3.4 2.5 Gr 6 enrollment: 39 Special needs (%): 12.4 2.200: -0.9 Math 3.2 E — 45.5 6.1 Math F 0.7 46.1 — F 0.5 2.9 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.6 2.9 5. of $111.9 4.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 39.2 3.9 1.8 2.5 — Saint-Antoine [Catholic] Tecumseh Gr 6 enrollment: 29 ESL (%): 0.8 n/a Writing 3.7 2. of $69. level: Reading 2.8 — St Angela [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 4.8 3.6 Math 2.8 2.1 — 2.6 n/a n/a 2.4 3.5 3.5 2.7 0.7 2.3 — 2.1 n/a n/a 27.3 Tests below standard (%) 50.4 3.6 2.6 Writing 2.9 6.9 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.9 2.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 13.1 — Writing 2.2 q 6.4 2.0 Writing 2.3 8.4 — 6.8 Gr 6 avg.500: -2.5 2.2 — Ruthven [Public] Ruthven Gr 6 enrollment: 25 ESL (%): 12.0 3.7 2.4 Gr 6 enrollment: 63 Special needs (%): 3.2 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 36.9 2.6 2.3 1.6 8.5 2.2 M 0.8 n/a n/a 3.9 2.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 2.9 6.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.8 — F 0.6 2.2 2.9 Writing 2.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 26.6 2. level: Reading 3.0 3.300: 0.5 2.5 n/a Sandwich West [Public] LaSalle ESL (%): 1. inc.5 2.1 17.9 2.5 — Sainte-Ursule [Catholic] McGregor Gr 6 enrollment: 21 ESL (%): 0.4 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.4 9.5 2.8 3.9 2.3 0.500: -0.5 4.5 4.2 E E — 27.8 3. level: Reading 2.4 2.6 Saint-Michel [Catholic] Leamington Gr 6 enrollment: 38 ESL (%): 0.6 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 3.3 3.1 F 0.4 — Sacred Heart [Catholic] LaSalle ESL (%): 0.8 2.4 2.0 2.0 Gr 6 avg.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.200: -1.2 8.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.3 — Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.1 Math M 0.6 2.6 Math 2.1 — Gr 6 avg.2 Tests below standard (%) 30. of $95.0 — 5.2 F 0.9 2.6 2. of $58. inc.2 17.0 6.3 Special needs (%): 6.0 q Roseville [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.3 Special needs (%): 26.6 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 2.6 2. of $60.6 2.8 2. level: Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.3 p Writing 2.4 — 2.0 3.4 2.0 — Math 3.4 3.9 Overall rating out of 10 6.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 47 Special needs (%): 10. inc.0 30.1 2.0 3.2 4. level: Reading 2.1 3.2 2.4 15.

7 2.1 F 0.1 n/a E n/a n/a 48.0 2.0 3.7 2.1 2.9 — St Louis [Catholic] Leamington ESL (%): 5.3 3.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading E F 0.3 — Overall rating out of 10 5.8 2. inc.7 2. of $77.3 M 0.3 n/a F 0.5 Math 2.9 — 7.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. level: Reading 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 — Tests not written (%) 5.3 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.5 2.3 2.7 2.1 2.8 — Math 2.3 7.5 2.8 5.0 3.6 2.8 2.2 7.0 — Gr 6 avg.6 Math 2.8 — St Jules [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 11.7 2.7 — 3.8 Writing 2.1 M 0.7 2.5 Overall rank: 1991/2742 1677/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.7 — F 0.2 4.9 34.9 3.8 2.2 F 0. level: Reading 2.1 39.5 — Tests not written (%) 0.0 2.7 — Math 2.8 2.5 F 0.3 3.7 8.0 Special needs (%): 7.7 1.4 Special needs (%): 5.7 30.4 2.3 Tests below standard (%) 50.0 2.6 7.8 7.8 Tests not written (%) 11. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.6 2.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.6 n/a n/a F 0.9 — Overall rating out of 10 6.3 2.2 6.9 3.9 2.5 2.7 2.8 6.0 — 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.600: 1.9 — Writing 2.7 0.3 M 0.1 M 0.8 Math 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.3 F 0.8 — Writing 2.4 p 6.8 28.0 0.5 2.6 9. level: Reading 2.3 6.8 3.7 2.1 2.8 2.2 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.4 F 0.6 Overall rank: 1655/2742 1499/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 3.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 48 Special needs (%): 6.6 2.6 2.8 1.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 14.5 2.200: -0.1 F 0.6 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.2 F 0. inc.3 F 0.6 — Math 2.1 — 2.7 — 2.1 M 0.7 — Math 2.8 11.9 2.6 2.0 3.0 — Math 2.2 M 0.8 33.2 q Tests below standard (%) 20.6 35.3 25.2 — Tests below standard (%) 36.8 0.7 Writing 2.4 F 0.7 2.6 2.9 3. level: Reading 2.1 50.3 F 0.8 — 13.9 Math 3.6 2.5 54.4 F 0.9 2.0 2.5 2.5 6 5.6 2.7 — Writing 2.2 E M 0.8 2.3 9.7 2.9 6.8 2.6 5.2 5.3 — 0.8 3.0 Tests not written (%) 2.5 2.4 0.0 3.7 2.8 2.900: -0. inc.9 51.2 3.1 Tests below standard (%) 21.3 1.6 2.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 6 8.7 3.8 — Writing 2.9 3.6 Gr 6 avg. level: Reading 2.2 43.6 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 — St Christopher [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 0.9 52.2 3.7 2.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 31.5 2.0 1.4 3. inc.8 — 3.5 2.9 2.5 34.5 2.7 2.8 — Writing 3.9 3.0 2.4 39.7 15.7 2.1 M 0.8 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.6 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.7 — Math 2.3 3.8 4. level: Reading 2.6 — St Maria Goretti [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 35 ESL (%): 0.6 2.1 3.5 Math 2.7 — Math 2.4 — Writing 2.6 2.4 3.3 2.8 22. level: Reading 3.1 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.4 — 2. level: Reading 3.4 — Math E F 0.3 F 0.3 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 475/2742 242/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — 4 6.8 3.6 2.5 2.1 6.8 q Math 2.4 2.600: 0.7 — Math 2.4 5. inc.1 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.2 37.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2600/2742 2030/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 — F 0.8 21.8 q Writing 2.5 — 2.3 Overall rating out of 10 4.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.5 2.5 2.7 Writing 2.8 — Writing 2.1 3.6 Writing 2.9 2.800: -1. of $60.1 16.0 2.5 2.8 2.5 30.6 2.6 — 5.6 — Gr 6 enrollment: 36 Special needs (%): 22.9 — Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.9 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.7 9.0 Writing 3.1 F 0.0 2.8 St John [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 5.3 Writing 2.7 2.8 3.5 2.1 F 0.8 2.4 2.7 2.3 22.5 2.7 2.6 — 3.1 2.5 2.5 Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 14.1 — St John de Brebeuf [Catholic] Kingsville Gr 6 enrollment: 36 ESL (%): 0.6 2.0 Special needs (%): 12.0 0.6 2.6 2.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 30.4 2.2 3. inc.2 5.8 — Gr 6 avg.0 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.2 p Math F 0.9 2.7 2.3 — St James [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 4.5 2.4 Tests not written (%) 12.6 2.5 2.2 — St Bernard [Catholic] Amherstburg Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.9 3.7 7.1 M 0.7 3.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 18.4 Overall rank: 1838/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.6 36.3 — Math M 0.5 — Writing 2.2 n/a M 0.0 3.0 — 2.0 0.3 — M 0.0 Special needs (%): 2.1 Gr 6 avg.1 5.7 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0. of $115.7 2.0 — 2.8 2.7 2.5 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 48.3 52.000: -1.5 n/a M 0. level: Reading 2.1 M 0.5 Writing 2.7 1.2 2.7 2.0 2.4 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.0 3.8 4. level: Reading 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 Tests not written (%) 3.3 6.5 Math 2.1 3.4 20. inc.9 2.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2.6 q 2.1 0.5 — 2.0 p Overall rating out of 10 6.7 2.5 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.7 2.1 2.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 24. of $65.2 — 2.2 F 0.3 E F 0.6 2.9 3.0 0.6 2.6 — Overall rating out of 10 7.4 3.7 2.0 Math 3.4 2.1 n/a n/a n/a 34.2 F 0.2 2.2 — F 0.0 Special needs (%): 13.3 p Gr 6 avg.9 Math 3.0 — 2.5 2. of $90.8 35.7 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. level: Reading 2.4 2.3 F 0. level: Reading 2.9 2.0 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1431/2742 1804/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 2.2 3.9 40.3 — 0.8 2.6 14.7 — 2.8 Math 2.1 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 Math 2.0 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.8 — St John Vianney [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 57 ESL (%): 3.8 3.1 E F 0.7 2.9 2.1 M 0.3 6 5.7 3.5 — 2.7 2.5 2.2 E — 18.6 57.4 2.0 — 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.2 Math M 0.1 n/a Math F 0.3 3.8 2.8 2.6 Tests not written (%) 0.1 3 5.0 2.300: -2.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 41.8 36.8 2.1 2.5 St Gabriel [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 0.5 2.0 3.8 1.7 8.5 2.0 3.1 6.6 2. inc.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 0.9 Math 2.4 5.0 3.5 Special needs (%): 12.7 n/a F 0. inc.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.3 8.7 2.7 3.0 0.100: -0. of $80.5 2.1 M 0.8 3.8 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.9 2.3 2.9 Gr 6 avg.7 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.9 46.5 q Math 2.3 E F 0.6 2.9 2.2 M 0.1 F 0.7 2.8 2.2 2.6 2.9 2.0 3.9 — Math 2.8 — 11.4 — 2.4 F 0.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2393/2742 1898/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 Overall rank: 714/2742 1312/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 Math M 0.9 2. level: Reading 2.0 0.5 2.8 2. of $47.7 2.3 n/a 43.5 5.6 2.6 — Writing 2.9 2.2 — St Gregory [Catholic] Tecumseh ESL (%): 0.7 — Math 2.0 — Gr 6 enrollment: 32 Special needs (%): 18.9 Writing 2.0 2.4 Writing 2.7 39.4 — 2.0 Overall rank: 1886/2742 1557/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.3 2. of $58.4 — 6.2 F 0.9 5.8 2.5 2.0 3.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 16.100: 1.7 2.6 2.8 40.0 3.5 2.1 2.9 2.7 5.7 — 2.7 — 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 573/2742 278/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 31. of $56.7 2.7 2.1 M 0.4 Writing 2. level: Reading 2.7 Gr 6 enrollment: 42 Special needs (%): 7.2 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.300: 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1838/2742 1677/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 2.9 3.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 42.7 2.9 — 2.4 — Writing 2.4 2. of $35. of $44. level: Reading 2.1 2.7 28.8 37.2 — F 0.2 3.7 2.8 3.8 — Overall rating out of 10 8.1 F 0.1 3. inc.5 2.6 Gr 6 avg.0 2.2 2.4 8.5 — M 0.4 Writing 2.7 20. of $77.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 35.1 Gr 6 avg.9 15.4 Tests not written (%) 7.9 — F 0.3 — 2.8 3.5 2.6 2.1 5.8 — 2.1 F 0.9 — Tests not written (%) 1.7 2.7 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 4 4.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 29.0 4.1 F 0.4 2.6 2.6 3.1 F 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 5.5 31.3 26.7 4.1 3.8 6.6 — Math 2. inc.0 2.8 2.9 3.5 2.6 — 2.6 2. inc.0 1. inc.0 — 2.0 0.2 5. inc.0 2.5 — Writing 2.0 — F 0.5 — 2.1 2.1 M 0.4 2.8 0.1 n/a M 0.700: -0.3 Math F 0.0 3.7 2.7 Overall rating out of 10 4.1 M 0. of $79.3 1.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.7 2.3 — .1 Tests below standard (%) 40.9 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.6 2.6 — 6.4 2.8 — Math 2.4 22.2 St Bernard [Catholic] Windsor ESL (%): 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 3.7 0.5 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 29.5 — 3.0 3.8 — 2.5 2.9 5.7 2.7 3.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 25 Special needs (%): 20.1 Overall rating out of 10 5.8 3.6 15.2 — Math F 0.2 7.1 — Gr 6 avg.1 3.6 6.1 — Tests not written (%) 6.6 2.4 n/a F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a E M 0.3 — 27.0 — St Joseph [Catholic] River Canard ESL (%): 0.2 M 0.8 25.9 2.4 42.9 3.7 3.0 — 3.0 4.9 19.1 F 0.0 0.7 2.900: 0.0 — Tests not written (%) 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 0.6 2.4 2.7 — Writing 2.0 26.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 17 Special needs (%): 29.6 2.8 2. inc.6 2.9 2.8 — Math 2. of $95.7 2.5 — 5.100: -0.6 — 6.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 — Gr 6 avg.2 Writing 2.9 — 2.6 4 4 2.5 2.5 7.7 2.9 — Math 3.8 2.1 — Tests not written (%) 4.3 E — Tests below standard (%) 34.0 2.1 M 0.9 2.3 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 46.9 24.1 n/a n/a Math F 0.7 3. level: Reading 2.104 Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010 St Anthony [Catholic] Harrow Gr 6 enrollment: 31 ESL (%): 0.3 q Writing 2.3 6.1 Overall rank: 1285/2742 1124/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.2 Math F 0.8 2.8 2.8 Math 3.7 35.4 2.0 Overall rating out of 10 8.1 2.4 F 0.8 Overall rank: 843/2742 242/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.7 2.3 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.4 2.1 M 0.1 n/a M 0.0 — 2.4 Overall rank: 714/2742 815/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 3.5 2.5 — 2.8 6.7 2.7 0.0 — F 0.0 Special needs (%): 19.1 Tests below standard (%) 23.300: 1.0 Overall rating out of 10 4.600: 1.3 2.8 q Gr 6 enrollment: 64 Special needs (%): 14.9 Gr 6 avg.7 — Writing 2.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 — Tests not written (%) 4.4 3.7 St John the Baptist [Catholic] Belle River Gr 6 enrollment: 62 ESL (%): 0.1 — Gr 6 avg.7 Gr 6 avg.8 Overall rating out of 10 7. level: Reading 2.7 2.1 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 902/2742 738/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.5 — 2.7 2.8 p Writing 2.8 — 2.4 18.6 2.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0. of $50.6 7.7 F 0.7 2.8 — F 0.9 2.3 1.6 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 29.8 Writing 2.2 F 0.2 2.5 5.0 Writing 2.5 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.2 33.7 2. level: Reading 2.5 — Overall rating out of 10 5.3 2.5 3.6 2.0 1. level: Reading 2.8 2.9 2. level: Reading 3.8 3.3 E — 33.7 7.7 2.5 0.4 q 2.8 2.9 2.3 Math 2.7 Tests not written (%) 0.1 — 1.2 1.6 2.3 2. level: Reading 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.9 37.7 2.

9 3.6 2.6 2.3 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 17.5 — Writing 2. of $100.9 — 7.6 2.0 3.8 — Math 2.6 1.7 2.8 3.0 2. of $101.2 2.8 67.9 2.9 2.6 Math 2.5 1.8 1.8 — Writing 2.3 2.6 28.6 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 2.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.0 3.2 3.8 n/a Gr 6 avg.4 — 8.200: 1.5 3.2 2.0 11.8 2.3 2.1 7.0 Special needs (%): 21.2 n/a n/a E M 0.1 3.5 2.2 n/a Math M 0.8 Overall rating out of 10 5.0 2.3 n/a n/a M 0.0 0.8 Math 3.1 — Writing 3.8 Writing 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.6 Overall rank: 1499/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.8 2.7 3.1 2.1 5.9 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3 1.4 20.1 Bellmoore [Public] Binbrook Gr 6 enrollment: 28 ESL (%): 0.1 p M 0.1 q Gr 6 enrollment: 34 Special needs (%): 11.5 2.9 2.0 3. inc.8 2.0 p 2.2 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a n/a 27. inc.6 29.3 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.1 Tests below standard (%) 33.0 30.6 3.6 Writing 2.700: -1.0 — Ste-Marguerite-d’Youville [Catholic] Tecumseh Gr 6 enrollment: 43 ESL (%): 0.7 22.9 2.5 M 0.5 46.3 — Math 2.1 2.1 9.4 2.8 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.0 Gr 6 avg.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.8 6.2 F 0.6 q 2.9 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg. of $115.6 — Overall rating out of 10 6.4 2.1 — 20.9 4.8 2.0 2.6 3.4 2.1 — Gr 6 enrollment: 58 Special needs (%): 8.9 2.4 n/a n/a E E n/a Math M 0.7 7.7 2.1 F 0.8 2.1 41.1 3.5 32.7 2.9 2.7 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.8 3.8 Gr 6 avg.1 F 0.6 2.1 1.1 n/a Tests below standard (%) 7.7 2.4 2.1 2.7 2.2 F 0.1 — 42.1 M 0.7 0.4 57.4 2.2 M 0.6 2.3 E — F 0.4 3.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.1 F 0.2 M 0.0 — Math 2. level: Reading n/a 2.8 43.2 2.1 — F 0.9 2.8 2. level: Reading 2.2 Math E Tests below standard (%) 22.4 Overall rank: 295/2742 34/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 6.8 2.8 2.6 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 7 7.8 Overall rank: 295/2742 626/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg. inc.3 — Talbot Trail [Public] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 93 ESL (%): 0.9 2.8 q Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.8 2.8 2.3 2. level: Reading 3.0 17.6 — 3.7 42.700: 0. level: Reading 2.8 Overall rank: 98/2742 152/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 — Math 2.8 2.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.7 — 3.5 — 3. level: Reading 2.0 — 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 7.6 2.5 n/a Overall rating out of 10 n/a 6.8 2.3 24.2 2.8 2.6 2.2 Overall rank: 2677/2742 2255/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 4.4 3.2 E p Math E M 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 2.7 — Gr 6 avg. inc.3 — .7 2.9 3.3 3.4 8.8 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.0 28.8 2.8 2.7 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 — Tests not written (%) 5.6 Wheatley Area [Public] Wheatley Gr 6 enrollment: 34 ESL (%): 8.6 2.2 M 0. level: Reading 2.8 Special needs (%): 14.8 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 997/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.4 2. level: Reading 3.8 5.0 2. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.3 Tests not written (%) 0.2 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 787/2742 571/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — Math 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg. level: Reading 2.6 — Tests not written (%) 1.3 2.5 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.1 3.700: 1.6 Overall rating out of 10 6.9 0.8 — 2.8 2.6 Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 — 6.6 Tests not written (%) 1.2 3.8 2.7 2.9 4.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.9 6.8 2.1 — Overall rating out of 10 4.0 2.2 F 0. inc.6 2.3 q Stella Maris [Catholic] Amherstburg Gr 6 enrollment: 26 ESL (%): 0.0 — Writing 2.9 3.200: 1.9 2.3 — M 0.4 n/a F 0.8 2.3 M 0.6 2.8 6.9 2.3 n/a n/a Math F 0.0 — Math 3.0 2.7 2.4 3. inc.2 M 0.0 2.4 9.9 8.8 2.7 3.4 16.5 2.4 7.5 2.2 6.4 1.6 Writing 2.8 — 3.3 6.700: -3.1 E — E E F 0.5 2.4 2.0 3. inc.7 3. level: Reading 2.2 — Tests below standard (%) 41.0 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 — Math 2. of $77.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 7.9 8.8 2.4 6.5 2.5 2.2 Overall rank: 2226/2742 1642/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.900: -0.1 — Adelaide Hoodless [Public] Hamilton Gr 6 enrollment: 50 ESL (%): 2.7 2.8 — Writing 2.9 — Writing 2.7 5.6 — M 0.0 2.8 3.1 2.0 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a n/a 0.8 28.2 Overall rank: 1156/2742 1383/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.0 0.7 — Overall rating out of 10 5.2 M 0.200: -0.2 E F 0.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.9 8.2 3. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.9 — Math 2.9 q 7.7 2.3 q F 0.4 M 0.7 2.2 13.6 Math 2.0 41.0 Tests not written (%) 2.7 2.1 3. level: Reading 2.0 3.3 n/a 27.7 2.9 2.5 2.0 2.6 q Math 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.9 0.8 6.1 — 19.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 — Gr 6 avg.0 2.2 q 2.7 3.2 F 0.3 8 7.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 2.1 n/a n/a F 0.9 2.6 2.5 2.3 — Tests below standard (%) 48.8 2.9 — Gr 6 avg.6 2.1 E — 21.6 Writing 2. level: Reading 3.5 1.4 2.9 2.4 2.3 2.8 — 2.9 2.7 0.3 F 0. of $84.6 2.9 Writing 2.0 — Gr 6 avg.1 1.8 Writing 2.9 p 2.9 2.1 24.6 7. inc.8 — 3.3 F 0.6 Writing 2.9 2.6 2.4 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 235/2742 409/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.2 3.8 — 2.8 6.7 2.600: 0. level: Reading 2. of $83.9 4.7 2.9 2.6 2.9 4.1 n/a Math n/a n/a F 0.8 2.7 3.2 2.6 — Math 2.0 Special needs (%): 5.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 16.5 23.6 3.3 14.3 61.1 E M 0.2 Math F 0.8 Gr 6 avg.6 2.3 2.9 2.2 n/a n/a Math E n/a F 0.1 n/a n/a Math F 0.6 2.8 2.2 p Gr 6 avg.5 63.6 q 3.8 3.9 5. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.4 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 37.9 Special needs (%): 10.7 Math 3.3 n/a Tests not written (%) n/a 2.5 2.4 — Tests not written (%) 2.0 Special needs (%): 18.0 6.8 2.3 Gr 6 enrollment: 65 Special needs (%): 9.8 Math 2.6 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 1215/2742 815/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.8 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 2.0 — Writing 2.8 2.1 6.1 E n/a Math n/a F 0.6 Writing 2.9 p Gr 6 avg.7 3.3 4.3 49.9 n/a Math n/a 2.0 29.6 2.6 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 M 0.0 2.0 3.1 F 0.1 F 0.6 2. level: Reading 2.9 3.1 49.5 2.8 2.6 3.6 2.9 2.1 n/a n/a E E n/a Tests below standard (%) 22.9 2.7 3.8 2.6 2.2 F 0.9 2.8 Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2 2.1 — Math 3.1 M 0.8 7.7 2.1 William G Davis [Public] Windsor ESL (%): 0.5 Overall rating out of 10 7.8 — 2.9 3.3 0.8 2.8 3.0 3.6 2.9 — St Rose [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 33 ESL (%): 0.8 2. level: Reading 2.6 — Writing 2.4 2.4 2.3 3.5 2.2 M 0.9 2.8 2.1 7.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.5 3.1 4. of $104.6 2. level: Reading 2.4 2.3 2.7 2.4 q Tests not written (%) 2.5 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.000: -1.0 0.5 2.9 2.1 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.1 Gr 6 enrollment: 68 Special needs (%): 7.1 Special needs (%): 22.1 4.Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 105 HAMILTON-WENTWORTH AREA St Peter [Catholic] Tecumseh ESL (%): 0.8 2.0 Special needs (%): 9.2 7.3 — Writing 2.7 2.0 — Overall rating out of 10 7.000: 0.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.9 — W J Langlois [Catholic] Windsor Gr 6 enrollment: 22 ESL (%): 9.2 F 0.9 6.5 2.2 52.6 6.0 — 2.9 3.4 — Ancaster Meadow [Public] Ancaster Gr 6 enrollment: 76 ESL (%): 15.1 Tests below standard (%) 35.0 2.5 2.6 Overall rating out of 10 7.1 F 0.6 2. of $114.800: -0.4 2.3 — Writing 2.3 n/a n/a M 0.3 3.5 n/a F 0.9 3.7 3.2 2.1 M 0. level: Reading 2.7 2.8 2.0 — Writing 2.8 — 2.9 2.3 31.6 0.5 q 2.0 2.4 — Gr 6 enrollment: 53 Special needs (%): 18.1 2.7 — 2.5 2.3 1.2 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 2.9 27.3 2.3 Math E Tests below standard (%) 28.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.3 M 0.8 3.6 — Math 2.0 2.8 — 3.2 n/a n/a E F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.7 2.6 2.2 2. level: Reading 3.8 2.8 2.8 2.0 Overall rank: 1038/2742 1599/2347 Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.2 — Writing 3.8 3. level: Reading 2.7 3.7 0.7 2. level: Reading 2.1 F 0.8 3.9 2.600: 2.7 8.5 q 1.2 Overall rank: 623/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.5 M 0.0 2.8 2.3 n/a Allan A Greenleaf [Public] Waterdown Gr 6 enrollment: 56 ESL (%): 8. inc.3 2. of $32.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.1 q Gr 6 avg.4 2.1 F 0.3 3.6 0.6 2. inc.8 2.6 2.9 — 3.2 3.000: 1.5 8.1 q 1.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 32.7 2.0 0.6 2.8 2.2 14.0 2.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ avg.1 2.1 3. inc.9 2008-09 Last 5 Years Overall rank: 2311/2742 1856/2347 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend 2.7 Tests not written (%) 6.9 n/a Gender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 6.0 1.3 2.9 — 3.1 16.5 8.6 2.3 2.7 2.4 24.6 Gr 6 avg.7 2.3 n/a Tests below standard (%) n/a 29.0 Writing 2.9 3.7 6.1 — Writing 3.6 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.3 Math 2.4 2.7 2.3 29.6 — Balaclava [Public] Carlisle ESL (%): 0.0 3.4 19.5 2.1 Math M 0.5 29.0 q St Pius X [Catholic] Tecumseh ESL (%): 0.7 — 3.1 3.3 n/a n/a M 0. inc. of $96.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.4 F 0.2 F 0.000: -0.2 F 0.9 2.3 2.9 3.6 2.7 2.0 Special needs (%): 7.5 n/a St William [Catholic] Emeryville ESL (%): 0.9 — Gr 6 avg. of $76.4 2. inc.9 — Overall rating out of 10 5.9 4.0 2.1 0.1 M 0. of $45.0 3.8 2.5 M 0.7 2.9 3.7 — 4.7 3. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.4 4. level: Reading 2.8 — Writing 2. of $109.6 2.4 Overall rank: 1087/2742 n/a Academic Performance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend Gr 3 avg.1 M 0.9 Tests not written (%) 0.5 2.8 2.7 2.7 Math 2.4 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.5 2.5 — 2.8 2.7 Writing 2.1 M 0.2 3.3 n/a n/a Tests below standard (%) 36.5 2.6 2.5 10.8 2.9 Math 2.4 Academic Performance 2005 Gr 3 avg.3 4.9 — Tests not written (%) 0.8 Special needs (%): 13.5 6.2 6.1 2.7 Math 2.3 p 2.7 2.6 Math 2.9 2.3 — Math E F 0.1 3.4 — 2.7 38.5 1.0 2.7 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.0 — 2.7 3.1 3.7 4.7 25.2 M 0.9 2.6 Gender gap (level): Reading n/a Math n/a Tests below standard (%) 40.7 2.4 0. inc.2 — Writing 2.5 2.0 1.7 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.6 2.1 M 0.4 F 0.5 46.0 p Overall rating out of 10 10 9 8.9 n/a Gr 6 avg.9 22.6 — F 0.0 3.0 1.8 2.0 — Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 27.5 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 3.2 — Math 4.8 2.8 — Math 2.9 24.9 3.5 3.0 Actual rating vs predicted based on 2008-09 Last 5 Years parents’ avg.8 32. level: Reading 2. level: Reading 2.4 21.8 — Math 2.0 25.4 — Math 2.9 28.7 — Writing 2.6 28.4 2.6 21.0 Overall rating out of 10 6. inc.2 3.0 — Overall rating out of 10 5.1 3.6 6. of $97.4 2.9 — F 0.0 3.0 — 7 6.0 5. of $51.1 F 0.1 — Tests not written (%) 3.4 2.7 2.

106

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2010

Bennetto [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 14.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $17,600: -2.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a
Writing
n/a
Math
n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a
Writing
n/a
Math
n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a

Gr 6 enrollment: 69
Special needs (%): 24.6
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2600/2742
n/a
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.1 2.3 1.9 2.0 n/a
2.4 2.5 2.1 2.5 n/a
2.2 2.2 1.9 2.2 n/a
2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 n/a
2.2 2.5 2.6 2.4 n/a
1.7 2.2 2.1 2.0 n/a
F 0.4 F 0.2 F 0.5 F 0.2 n/a
E
E F 0.2
E n/a
64.7 55.9 64.5 61.3 n/a
8.3 2.0 4.5 9.6 n/a
2.2 3.8 1.9 2.8 n/a

C H Bray [Public] Ancaster
ESL (%): 2.6
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $130,600: 0.1
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.8
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.0
Writing
3.1
Math
3.1
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
E
Tests below standard (%)
16.4
Tests not written (%)
2.8
Overall rating out of 10
8.4

Gr 6 enrollment: 38
Special needs (%): 7.9
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 623/2742 194/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.9 2.9 3.0 2.7 —
2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 p
2.8 2.9 3.0 2.8 —
3.1 3.1 2.8 2.8 q
3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 q
3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 q
F 0.3 M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.3 —
F 0.3 F 0.2 M 0.1 M 0.2 —
10.8 15.7 17.8 18.2 q
2.5 0.0 1.0 1.3 —
8.1 8.2 7.8 7.3 q

Collegiate Avenue [Public] Stoney Creek
Gr 6 enrollment: 31
ESL (%): 22.6
Special needs (%): 19.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $50,600: -0.6
Overall rank: 1991/2742 2127/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.1 2.6 2.2 2.4 —
Writing
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 —
Math
2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.2 2.6 2.9 2.9 —
Writing
2.6 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 —
Math
2.4 2.0 2.5 2.7 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
50.6 60.9 45.5 40.9 38.5 —
Tests not written (%)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.9 1.8 4.3 4.7 5.0 —

Billy Green [Public] Stoney Creek
ESL (%): 3.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $57,300: 0.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.7
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7
Math
F 0.4
Tests below standard (%)
39.2
Tests not written (%)
1.6
Overall rating out of 10
4.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 31
Special needs (%): 32.3
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1357/2742 1642/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.4 2.7 2.9 —
2.9 2.7 2.8 2.9 —
2.8 2.5 2.6 3.0 —
2.5 2.8 2.5 2.6 —
2.5 2.7 2.7 2.7 —
2.2 2.8 2.6 2.3 —
F 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a
F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a
45.0 38.9 31.5 30.8 —
10.0 15.3 15.2 18.5 q
4.5 5.4 5.8 6.1 p

Canadian Martyrs [Catholic] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 27
ESL (%): 11.1
Special needs (%): 18.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $46,000: 2.7
Overall rank: 261/2742 1312/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.6 2.6 2.3 3.0 —
Writing
3.0 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.9 —
Math
3.0 2.6 2.8 2.6 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.9 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.9 p
Math
2.6 2.4 2.4 2.2 3.3 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a F 0.2 M 0.1 n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a F 0.2 M 0.5 n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
31.5 39.9 41.1 46.1 17.6 —
Tests not written (%)
3.5 4.7 1.6 2.1 5.6 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.7 5.4 5.1
4 8.2 —

Corpus Christi [Catholic] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 33
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 12.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $72,500: 1.3
Overall rank: 623/2742 1124/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.8 —
Writing
2.7 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 p
Math
2.9 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.6 2.3 2.9 2.6 —
Writing
2.7 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 —
Math
2.9 2.2 2.5 2.9 2.7 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 F 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.1 n/a n/a
Math
F 0.3
E F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
29.6 46.7 36.2 23.6 21.7 —
Tests not written (%)
6.3 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.4 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.1 4.9 5.7 7.2 7.3 —

Blessed Kateri Tekakwitha [Catholic] Hamilton Gr 6 enrollment: 22
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 36.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $47,100: 3.2
Overall rank: 147/2742 879/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.5 3.0 2.9 2.8 —
Writing
2.8 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.0 p
Math
2.6 2.5 3.3 3.1 3.0 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.0 p
Writing
2.5 2.6 2.6 3.2 3.2 p
Math
2.1 2.3 2.3 2.6 3.3 p
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.5 F 0.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
F 0.2
E n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
44.8 47.0 29.8 16.4 14.5 p
Tests not written (%)
1.5 4.7 5.0 1.9 7.9 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.6 4.5 6.7 8.5 8.7 p

Cathy Wever [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 74
ESL (%): 24.3
Special needs (%): 24.3
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $25,200: -3.6
Overall rank: 2704/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a 1.7 2.1 1.5 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a 2.1 2.5 2.2 n/a
Math
n/a n/a 2.2 2.2 2.1 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a n/a 2.2 2.2 2.1 n/a
Writing
n/a n/a 2.4 2.3 2.5 n/a
Math
n/a n/a 2.1 1.9 2.1 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 n/a
Math
n/a n/a M 0.5 M 0.2 F 0.2 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a n/a 64.2 64.0 68.8 n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a n/a 6.2 6.7 2.1 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a n/a 1.7 2.3 1.5 n/a

Dr John Seaton [Public] Sheffield
Gr 6 enrollment: 57
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 15.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $82,300: 1.8
Overall rank: 330/2742 1383/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.9 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.9 —
Writing
2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.9 —
Math
2.7 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.1 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.9 —
Writing
2.6 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.9 —
Math
2.6 2.9 2.6 2.7 3.0 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4 F 0.1 F 0.4 F 0.8 M 0.1 —
Math
F 0.1 M 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.4 M 0.1 —
Tests below standard (%)
44.8 23.6 35.5 46.2 14.6 —
Tests not written (%)
4.1 2.6 0.0 4.6 1.2 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.6 6.8 6.2 3.5 8.0 —

Blessed Sacrament [Catholic] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 50
ESL (%): 2.0
Special needs (%): 30.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $56,700: -0.7
Overall rank: 1991/2742 1251/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.4 —
Writing
2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 —
Math
2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.8 2.6 3.0 2.7 —
Writing
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 —
Math
2.4 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.3 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
E M 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.2 —
Math
M 0.4 M 0.3 M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.2 —
Tests below standard (%)
38.2 34.2 31.6 24.1 39.6 —
Tests not written (%)
5.7 10.2 2.5 3.5 2.6 —
Overall rating out of 10
5.6 5.8 6.5 7.2 5.0 —

Cecil B Stirling [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 28.3
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $44,600: -2.6
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2
Writing
2.4
Math
2.2
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.4
Math
2.3
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
Math
M 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
60.1
Tests not written (%)
2.6
Overall rating out of 10
3.6

Gr 6 enrollment: 46
Special needs (%): 23.9
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2583/2742 2190/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.5 2.4 2.1 1.8 —
2.5 2.6 2.3 2.3 —
2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 —
2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 q
2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 —
2.5 2.2 2.5 2.4 —
M 0.1 F 0.1 n/a M 0.1 n/a
M 0.2 M 0.1 n/a M 0.1 n/a
43.1 50.4 57.5 59.8 —
13.3 5.7 0.0 1.3 —
5.1 4.3 2.3 2.9 —

Dundas Central [Public] Dundas
ESL (%): 4.2
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $67,100: 0.2
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8
Writing
2.9
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
3.0
Writing
3.0
Math
3.1
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4
Math
F 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
16.2
Tests not written (%)
2.3
Overall rating out of 10
8

Buchanan Park [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 32
ESL (%): 3.1
Special needs (%): 12.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $69,500: -1.8
Overall rank: 2284/2742 1251/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.6 —
Writing
2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 —
Math
2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.5 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 q
Writing
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.5 —
Math
2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 q
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
E n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a M 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
33.3 30.7 31.3 25.9 43.2 —
Tests not written (%)
0.0 0.0 2.0 5.1 1.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.1 6.4 6.6 6.8 4.2 —

Chedoke [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 6.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $49,400: -3.0
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.9
Writing
2.3
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.4
Math
2.3
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
61.9
Tests not written (%)
3.2
Overall rating out of 10
2.9

Gr 6 enrollment: 45
Special needs (%): 35.6
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2621/2742 2270/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.0 2.5 2.4 2.1 —
2.2 2.6 2.5 2.5 —
2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 —
2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 —
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 q
2.4 2.4 2.3 1.8 —
F 0.6 F 0.3 n/a F 0.1 n/a
F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a M 0.1 n/a
61.3 49.6 54.1 63.3 —
4.1 8.9 4.2 0.0 —
2.2 4.1
3 2.6 —

Eastdale [Public] Stoney Creek
Gr 6 enrollment: 21
ESL (%): 4.8
Special needs (%): 23.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,800: -1.0
Overall rank: 2183/2742 1312/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 —
Writing
2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.4 q
Math
3.1 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.7 q
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 —
Writing
2.7 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.8 —
Math
2.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.6 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a
Math
n/a n/a F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
34.3 27.3 26.8 43.7 43.8 —
Tests not written (%)
2.8 2.7 6.7 0.6 0.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
6.3
7 6.9 4.6 4.5 —

Gr 6 enrollment: 72
Special needs (%): 22.2
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1357/2742 738/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.6 2.3 2.9 2.9 —
2.8 2.6 2.9 3.1 —
3.0 2.8 3.0 2.9 —
2.8 2.7 2.8 2.6 q
2.7 2.5 2.8 2.7 —
2.9 3.0 3.2 2.7 —
F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.4 —
M 0.2 M 0.2 M 0.2 F 0.1 —
25.4 38.4 22.1 29.3 —
5.0 0.0 0.8 1.5 —
6.9 5.6 7.4 6.1 —

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy

107

Eastmount Park [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 31
ESL (%): 6.5
Special needs (%): 19.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $52,100: -2.7
Overall rank: 2583/2742 2292/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.2 —
Writing
2.1 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 p
Math
2.0 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.5 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 q
Math
2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 —
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Math
M 0.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
53.4 59.8 53.0 57.4 54.3 —
Tests not written (%)
0.0 1.6 2.9 6.0 0.6 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.9 2.1
3 2.1 2.9 —

Gatestone [Public] Stoney Creek
ESL (%): 15.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $70,200: 0.8
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
n/a
Writing
n/a
Math
n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
n/a
Writing
n/a
Math
n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a
Math
n/a
Tests below standard (%)
n/a
Tests not written (%)
n/a
Overall rating out of 10
n/a

Gr 6 enrollment: 65
Special needs (%): 13.8
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 902/2742
n/a
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.5 2.4 2.4 2.9 n/a
2.7 2.5 2.7 2.9 n/a
2.6 2.4 2.8 3.0 n/a
2.6 2.8 2.5 2.7 n/a
2.9 2.8 2.6 2.9 n/a
2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 n/a
F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.4
E n/a
M 0.1 F 0.4 M 0.4 M 0.2 n/a
36.3 41.3 37.2 25.1 n/a
4.8 2.5 0.0 3.3 n/a
5.6 5.1 4.8 6.8 n/a

Guy B Brown [Public] Waterdown
Gr 6 enrollment: 36
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 25.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $139,600: 0.9
Overall rank: 261/2742 278/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
3.0 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.1 —
Writing
3.1 3.0 3.1 2.8 3.0 —
Math
3.0 3.2 3.0 2.7 3.4 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.9 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.8 —
Writing
2.8 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.7 —
Math
2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.7 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1
E n/a F 0.6 n/a n/a
Math
E M 0.3 n/a F 0.5 n/a n/a
Tests below standard (%)
21.5 20.0 21.9 25.5 18.7 —
Tests not written (%)
1.3 1.2 0.0 2.5 0.0 —
Overall rating out of 10
8.1 7.9 7.9 6.3 8.2 —

Elizabeth Bagshaw [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 37
ESL (%): 27.0
Special needs (%): 27.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $39,800: -1.7
Overall rank: 2436/2742 2255/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.3 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.5 —
Writing
2.8 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.6 —
Math
2.6 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.1 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.3 —
Writing
2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.3 q
Math
2.3 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.2 —
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.6 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 1.1 M 0.3 —
Math
F 0.5 M 0.2
E F 0.7 M 0.1 —
Tests below standard (%)
51.6 47.0 64.1 53.5 51.3 —
Tests not written (%)
9.0 7.8 1.9 6.2 1.8 —
Overall rating out of 10
3.3 4.4 2.6 1.6 3.7 —

George L Armstrong [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 45
ESL (%): 6.7
Special needs (%): 20.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $60,200: -2.5
Overall rank: 2530/2742 2000/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4 2.7 2.4 2.4 1.7 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.2 —
Math
2.5 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.1 q
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 2.7 2.4 2.6 2.6 —
Writing
2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.6 —
Math
2.6 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.3 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a F 0.1 F 0.5 F 0.4 F 0.1 n/a
Math
n/a M 0.1 F 0.5 F 0.4 M 0.1 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
43.5 34.9 42.3 47.0 57.7 q
Tests not written (%)
6.3 10.6 8.2 7.0 8.9 —
Overall rating out of 10
4.8 5.8 4.2 3.9 3.3 q

Helen Detwiler [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 58
ESL (%): 22.4
Special needs (%): 19.0
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $60,700: -2.5
Overall rank: 2530/2742 1557/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.1 q
Writing
2.9 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 q
Math
2.7 2.6 2.5 3.0 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.5 —
Writing
2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.5 —
Math
2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.4 q
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.1 F 0.4 F 0.3 F 0.1 M 0.3 —
Math
M 0.1 F 0.1 M 0.2 M 0.3 M 0.4 q
Tests below standard (%)
27.2 34.0 37.2 30.8 51.8 q
Tests not written (%)
2.8 3.3 2.4 1.6 1.9 —
Overall rating out of 10
7 5.8 5.4 6.2 3.3 —

Fessenden [Public] Ancaster
ESL (%): 4.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $102,700: 0.4
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.7
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.9
Writing
2.8
Math
2.9
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.4
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
24.9
Tests not written (%)
1.1
Overall rating out of 10
6.9

Gordon Price [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 5.7
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $60,100: 0.5
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.6
Writing
2.8
Math
2.8
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.6
Math
2.7
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.3
Math
M 0.1
Tests below standard (%)
29.8
Tests not written (%)
3.0
Overall rating out of 10
6.4

Gr 6 enrollment: 53
Special needs (%): 18.9
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 1215/2742 879/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 —
2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
2.8 2.9 2.7 3.0 —
2.7 3.3 2.8 2.8 —
2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
2.9 3.2 2.5 2.7 —
F 0.1 M 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.4 —
F 0.1 M 0.4 M 0.2 F 0.3 —
27.9 20.3 32.6 25.5 —
10.1 2.4 1.0 2.5 —
6.7 7.4 6.1 6.3 —

Hess Street [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 63.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $16,300: -2.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.3
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.3
Writing
2.4
Math
2.5
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.2
Math
M 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
50.9
Tests not written (%)
7.8
Overall rating out of 10
4.1

Gr 6 enrollment: 41
Special needs (%): 24.4
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2660/2742 2172/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.5 2.5 2.0 1.7 q
2.4 2.7 2.6 2.4 —
2.6 2.8 2.5 2.2 —
2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 q
2.4 2.6 2.3 2.5 —
2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 q
F 0.1 n/a F 0.2 F 0.1 n/a
F 0.2 F 0.3
E M 0.2 —
51.9 42.1 55.1 64.4 —
7.8 20.1 9.3 8.4 —
4.2 4.7 3.2 2.2 —

Flamborough Centre [Public] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 81
ESL (%): 1.2
Special needs (%): 14.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $73,800: 0.7
Overall rank: 964/2742
n/a
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
3.1 n/a n/a 2.8 3.0 n/a
Writing
3.1 n/a n/a 2.8 3.1 n/a
Math
3.0 n/a n/a 2.9 3.0 n/a
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5 n/a n/a 2.7 2.7 n/a
Writing
2.5 n/a n/a 2.9 2.9 n/a
Math
2.9 n/a n/a 2.8 2.8 n/a
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7 n/a n/a F 0.4 F 0.4 n/a
Math
F 0.3 n/a n/a F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
29.2 n/a n/a 26.0 24.3 n/a
Tests not written (%)
1.9 n/a n/a 3.2 0.0 n/a
Overall rating out of 10
6.4 n/a n/a 6.6 6.7 n/a

Green Acres [Public] Stoney Creek
Gr 6 enrollment: 38
ESL (%): 31.6
Special needs (%): 18.4
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $46,300: 0.1
Overall rank: 1655/2742 1804/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.2 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 p
Writing
2.4 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.7 —
Math
2.8 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.8 —
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.6 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.8 —
Writing
2.6 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.8 —
Math
2.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.9 —
Gender gap (level): Reading
n/a n/a n/a F 0.1 F 0.5 n/a
Math
n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 F 0.5 n/a
Tests below standard (%)
40.6 45.2 48.6 36.8 26.4 —
Tests not written (%)
8.6 9.2 4.0 5.9 5.4 —
Overall rating out of 10
5 4.3 3.7 5.9 5.6 —

Highview [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 5.8
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $76,700: -1.7
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
1.9
Writing
2.4
Math
2.4
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.5
Writing
2.7
Math
2.7
Gender gap (level): Reading M 0.1
Math
F 0.2
Tests below standard (%)
47.9
Tests not written (%)
1.3
Overall rating out of 10
4.5

Gr 6 enrollment: 52
Special needs (%): 23.1
2008-09 Last 5 Years
Overall rank: 2226/2742 1677/2347
2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
2.6 2.7 2.5 2.2 —
2.4 2.8 2.7 2.4 —
2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 —
2.8 2.5 2.4 2.5 —
2.8 2.6 2.6 2.7 q
2.9 2.8 2.5 2.7 —
F 0.5
E n/a F 0.2 n/a
E M 0.1 n/a F 0.1 n/a
32.1 33.7 39.6 45.9 —
2.6 6.5 6.8 4.7 q
6 6.3 4.6 4.4 —

Franklin [Public] Hamilton
ESL (%): 35.1
Actual rating vs predicted based on
parents’ avg. inc. of $45,100: -1.0
Academic Performance
2005
Gr 3 avg. level:
Reading
2.4
Writing
2.6
Math
2.5
Gr 6 avg. level:
Reading
2.7
Writing
2.7
Math
2.7
Gender gap (level): Reading F 0.7
Math
F 0.7
Tests below standard (%)
42.5
Tests not written (%)
5.6
Overall rating out of 10
4.1

Guardian Angels [Catholic] Hamilton
Gr 6 enrollment: 57
ESL (%): 0.0
Special needs (%): 3.5
Actual rating vs predicted based on
2008-09 Last 5 Years
parents’ avg. inc. of $111,600: 1.0
Overall rank: 396/2742 626/2347
Academic Performance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Trend
Gr 3 avg. level:
Rea