This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

### Publishers

Scribd Selects Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

P. 1

Noise Prediction in Fan|Views: 63|Likes: 1

Published by Amit Pandita

See more

See less

https://www.scribd.com/doc/88857046/Noise-Prediction-in-Fan

11/25/2012

text

original

**Rafael Ballesteros-Tajadura
**

e-mail: rballest@uniovi.es

**Sandra Velarde-Suárez
**

e-mail: sandrav@uniovi.es

**Juan Pablo Hurtado-Cruz
**

e-mail: jhurtado@usach.cl Área de Mecánica de Fluidos, Universidad de Oviedo, Campus de Gijón, 33271 Gijón, Spain

Centrifugal fans are widely used in several applications, and in some cases, the noise generated by these machines has become a serious problem. The centrifugal fan noise is frequently dominated by tones at the blade passing frequency as a consequence of the strong interaction between the ﬂow discharged from the impeller and the volute tongue. In this study, a previously published aeroacoustic prediction methodology (Cho, Y., and Moon, Y.J., 2003, “Discrete Noise Prediction of Variable Pitch Cross-Flow Fans by Unsteady Navier-Stokes Computations,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125, pp. 543–550) has been extended to three-dimensional turbulent ﬂow in order to predict the noise generated by a centrifugal fan. A three-dimensional numerical simulation of the complete unsteady ﬂow on the whole impeller-volute conﬁguration has been carried out using the computational ﬂuid dynamics code FLUENT®. The unsteady forces applied by the fan blades to the ﬂuid are obtained from the data provided by the simulation. The Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings model extension of Lighthill’s analogy has been used to predict the aerodynamic noise generated by the centrifugal fan from these unsteady forces. Also, the noise generated by the fan has been measured experimentally, and the experimental results have been compared to the numerical results in order to validate the aerodynamic noise prediction methodology. Reasonable agreement has been found between the numerical and the experimental results. DOI: 10.1115/1.2953229 Keywords: centrifugal fan, noise prediction, aeroacoustic

Introduction

Centrifugal fans are widely used because they achieve high pressure ratios in a short axial distance compared to axial fans. However, the noise generated by these machines can become a serious problem. The aerodynamic noise of the fan can be divided into a discrete tonal noise, induced by the periodic interactions between the rotating blades and the volute tongue, and a broadband noise, mainly due to the turbulent ﬂuctuations. In particular, the blade passing frequency BPF tonal noise is known as the most annoying component to the human ear. Neise 1 made a complete review of the fan noise generation mechanisms and the methods of control. The capability of the existing computers allows the numerical simulation of complex ﬂow features that commonly take place in centrifugal fans: unsteady ﬂow, important three-dimensional effects, and on complex geometries. Presently, some commercial codes exist that have shown their validity and reliability for the description and prediction of the unsteady ﬂow into turbomachinery. Also, the development of powerful computers and more efﬁcient codes has brought the application of the acoustic analogy to predict the noise of turbomachinery not involved in aeronautical applications, as the fans used in air-conditioning, home appliance machines, or industrial ventilation. For the past years, an increasing number of works has applied the acoustic analogy to such fans. Jeon et al. 2 calculate the aeroacoustic pressure generated by a centrifugal fan in a vacuum cleaner by the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings formulation 3 . Jeon et al. 4 obtain acoustic farﬁeld information from the unsteady force ﬂuctuations on the blade by the Lowson’s equation; in this way, the effects of some design

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 23, 2007; ﬁnal manuscript received April 17, 2008; published online August 12, 2008. Assoc. Editor: Chunill Hah. Paper presented at the 2006 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting and Exhibition FEDSM2006 , Miami, FL, July 17–20, 2006.

parameters on the noise of a centrifugal fan are investigated. Choo and Moon 5 and Moon et al. 6 predict the noise generated by cross ﬂow fans using Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings formulation and Curle’s equation, respectively. Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings formulation is also used by Maaloum et al. 7 to predict the tonal noise generated by an axial ﬂow fan used in an automotive air cooling system. In this study, an aeroacoustic predictive capability has been implemented and tested. First, the unsteady ﬂow solutions of the fan were worked out with a commercial software package, ® FLUENT . Second, the sound pressure in the far ﬁeld around the fan is predicted by the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings formulation 3 , based on unsteady pressure data obtained at the surfaces of the rotating blades and the volute tongue. Finally, experimental measurements of the sound pressure level around the fan are shown and compared to the numerical results provided by the prediction method.

**Description of the Fan
**

The studied machine is a simple aspirating centrifugal fan driven by an ac 9.2 kW motor rotating at 1500 rpm. The shrouded impeller tested has ten backward-curved blades with an outlet diameter of 400 mm. The blades are made of ﬂat sheet metal. The minimum distance between the impeller and the volute tongue is 12.5% of the outlet impeller diameter. The widths of the impeller and volute are, respectively, 130 mm and 248 mm. Figure 1 shows two pictures of the tested fan and Table 1 summarizes the main dimensions of its impeller. The tests for the aerodynamic and acoustic characterization of the fan have been made in a normalized ducted installation Type B according to ISO 5136 8 . Figure 2 shows a sketch of this installation. More details about the installation and measurement procedures have been reported in previous works 9,10 . SEPTEMBER 2008, Vol. 130 / 091102-1

Journal of Fluids Engineering

Copyright © 2008 by ASME

Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156.35.192.2. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm

k = 1.model. FLUENT® offers this option. 2 Sketch of the test installation 091102-2 / Vol. The unsteady ﬂow is solved applying a sliding mesh technique.Fig. 3 x1 = x. a simpler model is used close to the wall usually a one-equation model and then the eddy viscosity is patched at a certain distance from the wall. C = 0.2.0. implicit scheme. the turbulent viscosity is given by t =C k2 5 and Gk = t in which p denotes the pressure and ij is the stress tensor.model was introduced by Launder and Spalding 13 .3. The time-dependent term of all the equations is discretized with a second order. C2 = 1. which has been successfully applied to turbomachinery ﬂows 11. i = 1 . The basic equations describing the ﬂow in FLUENT® are the conservation of mass and the conservation of momentum. viscous effects become important and this assumption no longer holds. 1 Tested fan with the location of some measurement points Numerical Methodology Unsteady Viscous Flow Computation. the additional transport equations in direction xi at time t that are solved for k and are given by t + k + xi ui u ik = t xi t k k xi + C1 + Gk − 2 3 t xi = xi xi k Gk − C2 k 4 where is the density and ui is the velocity in direction i. The Table 1 Impeller dimensions Outlet diameter mm Inlet diameter mm Outlet width mm Impeller-tongue distance mm Impeller-tongue distance % of outlet diameter 400 280 130 50 12. 2 . Once the components of velocity have been Fig.cfm .35. and = 1. and rameters of the standard k. Second order. In are pathese equations.09. A full threedimensional simulation of the unsteady ﬂow in the centrifugal fan described above was carried out. upwind discretization has been used for convection terms and central difference schemes for diffusion terms. k. the coefﬁcients C1 .5% uj ui + xi xj uj xi 6 represents the rate of production of the turbulent kinetic energy.model.192.92. see http://www. and ui denote the density and the velocity in direction i. respectively. which have the following empirically derived values: C1 = 1. Several modiﬁcations have been proposed: In the two-layer formulation 14 . is given by t + xi ui = 0 1 high Reynolds number version is obtained by neglecting all the terms containing the kinematic viscosity. C2 . More precisely.12 . This code uses the ﬁnite volume method and the Navier–Stokes equations are solved on an unstructured grid. In the general form.asme. SEPTEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156.44. The conservation of momentum is described by t ui + xi u iu j = − p ij + xi xj 2 Here. Furthermore. The calculations have been performed with a commercial software package. the conservation of mass in direction xi.org/terms/Terms_Use. 130.model is an eddy-viscosity model consisting of two equations for the turbulent kinetic energy k and its dissipation rate . The momentum equations and the continuity equation are solved sequentially. The k. x2 = y and x3 = z at time t. C . The standard k. Turbulence is simulated with the standard k. In the proximity of solid walls. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. FLUENT®.

130 / 091102-3 Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. 5 General view of the geometry of the fan Fig. A comprehensive description of this algorithm is given by Patankar 15 . Its results are used as an initial value for the unsteady simulation. According to this ﬁgure. The errors in the solution related to the mesh must disappear for an increasingly ﬁner mesh. and the volute with a total of 733. The SIMPLEC algorithm was used in the present work. The total pressure coefﬁcient at the ﬂow rate where the fan exhibits its best efﬁciency point was used to determine the inﬂuence of the mesh size on the solution. The small axial gap 9 mm between the impeller and the volute rear casing was not modeled.asme. the computation time of the unsteady simulation is reduced. The convergence criterion was a maximum residual of 10−6. a steady-state simulation has been performed. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. Figure 3 shows the evolution of the fan total pressure coefﬁcient with the mesh cells. The set of simultaneous algebraic equations is solved by a semi-implicit iterative scheme. The simulation ends when the obtained solution becomes periodic.400 cells .org/terms/Terms_Use. which starts from an arbitrary initial solution and converges to the correct solution after several iterations.35. This pressure correction equation is then solved to obtain the necessary corrections to the pressure and velocity ﬁelds such that continuity is satisﬁed. Figure 4 shows a general view of the Fig. the grids with the highest number of mesh cells were considered to be reliable enough to assure mesh independence. During the unsteady simulation. both unsteady and averaged ﬂow quantities are stored. the impeller. However.Fig. Vol. Unstructured tetrahedral cells are used to deﬁne the open inlet zone. In this way. see http://www. the radial gap between the impeller front shroud 5 mm and the casing was taken into account in the model. 3 Inﬂuence of mesh size on the fan total pressure coefﬁcient calculated for each mesh cell the velocities may not satisfy the continuity equation and then a “Poisson-type” equation for a socalled “pressure correction” is derived from the continuity equation and the linearized momentum equations. The mesh is reﬁned near the volute tongue and in the impeller domain.2. First.cfm . 4 Sketch of the fan unstructured mesh Fig. 6 Mesh details around the radial gap between the impeller front shroud and the casing Journal of Fluids Engineering SEPTEMBER 2008.192.

The case of the radial component is different: Zones with very low values even negatives. with a conﬁdence level of 95%.e. The z-coordinate has been normalized by the volute width B 248 mm . with a recirculation pattern are present near the impeller shroud. with the fan operating at the BEP. In this way. The measurement positions shown in Fig. 8 Contours of the relative tangential component of velocity at the impeller outlet „negative values are clockwise… unstructured mesh. As these microphones are only able to measure pressure ﬂuctuations. The number of iterations has been adjusted to reduce the residual below an acceptable value in each time step. The uncertainty of these two types of microphones has been established by the manufacturer in 0.105 .192.35. The time step used in the unsteady calculation has been set to 1. The impeller grid movement is related to this time step and the rotational speed imposed = 157 rad s−1 . SEPTEMBER 2008 values correspond to zones into the blade channels located near the impeller shroud whereas the minimum ones appear in the blade wakes and close to the back impeller plate. These ﬁgures show the 3D-numerical results of the relative tangential component and of the radial component of velocity over a cylindrical surface around the impeller outlet. which simulates the closure of a valve. The ﬂow rate is changed by modifying the constant for that pressure drop at the outlet condition. see http://www. probably due to the presence of ﬂow separation in the blade channels. 11. The best efﬁciency point BEP corresponds to a ﬂow rate Q = 0. The minimum cell volume is 2. The three-dimensional effects of the ﬂow are illustrated in Figs. total pressure at the domain inlet and a pressure drop proportional to the kinetic energy at the domain outlet. 7.org/terms/Terms_Use. one blade passage each in 30 time steps . In Fig. 130. the numerical and experimental performance curves for the tested fan are compared.Fig.92 m3 / s = 0. 5 and the mesh used in the modeled gap is shown in Fig. so a complete revolution is performed each in 300 steps i. The experimental pressure ﬂuctuations were obtained with B&K 4138 1 / 8 in. 9 Contours of the radial component of velocity at the impeller outlet Transactions of the ASME Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. 8 and 9. with a total pressure rise PT = 500 Pa = 0.cfm .asme. while z / B = 0 is the volute rear casing and z / B = 1 is the volute front casing. Both components of velocity exhibit important gradients in the axial direction. where the negative values are clockwise.093 . In particular. whereas the maximum values are concentrated near the hub. over 17 impeller revolutions approximately 5000 time steps are necessary to achieve the convergence to the periodic unsteady solution. The numerical model described above has been employed to calculate the time-dependent pressure both in the impeller and in the volute. the pressure ﬂuctuations in some locations over the volute wall have been obtained. The numerical data are obtained after averaging the values of the unsteady calculation.4 GHz nodes.2. The impeller shroud corresponds to z / B = 0. the ratio between the sum of the residuals and the sum of the ﬂuxes for a given variable in all the cells is reduced to the value of 10−5 ﬁve orders of magnitude . and the nonslip condition is applied. only the ﬂuctuating part of the signals is compared.34 10−4 s seconds in order to get enough time resolution for the dynamic analysis. the results obtained at Position P02 angular position Fig. Initializing the unsteady calculation with the steady solution. The modeled boundary conditions are those considered with more physical meaning for turbomachinery ﬂow simulations. for two different ﬂow rates: the BEP and 1. At partial load. In Fig. The experimental and 3D-numerical simulated curves agree for ﬂow rates equal and higher than the BEP. with the operating points selected in this study „white squares… Fig. The code was run in a cluster of 8 Pentium 4 2. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. that is. some details of the geometric features of the model are shown in Fig. which has not been correctly captured by the numerical procedure. the matching between 3D-numerical and experimental results is not so high. microphones ﬂush mounted on the volute surface. The walls of the model are stationary with respect to their respective frame of reference. The method described above has been employed to make a comparison for both the numerical and experimental performance curves for the tested fan. 7 Fan performance dimensionless curves: experimental „black squares… and numerical „black triangles…. In the tangential component.35 BEP..54. 10 and detailed in Table 2 have been selected in order to make comparisons between the numerical and experimental results. 6. Flow Field Results. This feature indicates that the main fraction of the ﬂow rate passes through the rear middle part of the impeller. Figures 11 and 12 show the evolution of pressure ﬂuctuations with time obtained both by 3D-numerical model and experimentally.47 10−5 m3.21 10−11 m3 and the maximum cell volume is 6.2 dB. the maximum absolute 091102-4 / Vol.

Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. Also. A peak at 25 Hz stands out.Fig.40. and P10 180 deg from the tongue have been represented. 13 . In Fig. and 325 Hz in the experimental spectra. Second. Also. 16. besides the radial distance from the impeller to the volute is greater than in the previous case. which distorts the clear sinusoidal pattern shown at the tongue. 13 basically due to the interaction between the ﬂow leaving the impeller and the tongue. This disagreement was expected because the position z / B = 0. 14 . while in the position z / B = 0. both numerically and experimentally. 13–15. 130 / 091102-5 Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. the experimental and numerical amplitudes at the BPF in z / B = 0. the results obtained at Position P10 180 deg from the tongue. the amplitudes of volute pressure ﬂuctuations at the BPF have been represented. shown in Fig. In Fig. P06 60 deg from the tongue . As the small axial gap between the impeller and the volute rear casing was not modeled.093 . connected to a 2635 B&K ampliﬁer.30 have been represented. The amplitudes at these frequencies did not vary with the ﬂow rate. the maximum values appear concentrated in a small zone very close to the volute tongue. although they contribute largely in the spectra. some vibration signals at the volute front casing were obtained with a 4384 B&K piezoelectric accelerometer. as it was expected. In Position P06 60 deg from the tongue .15 they are slightly different.15. In Figs.cfm . 12. the amplitude of the pressure ﬂuctuations is lower than in the previous positions mentioned Fig. as a result of the increase in the radial distance between the impeller and the volute wall. suggesting the existence of mechanical sources of noise. the 3D-numerical and experimental Table 2 Angular coordinates of the measurement points over the volute Angular position deg 0 2 9 16 23 Volute points P06 P07 P08 P09 P10 Angular position deg 60 90 120 150 180 Volute points P11 P12 P13 P14 Angular position deg 210 240 270 300 Tongue points P01 P02 P03 P04 P05 Journal of Fluids Engineering SEPTEMBER 2008. These two reasons explain the great reduction in the amplitude of the pressure ﬂuctuations with respect to the previous case. the amplitudes corresponding to the BPF have strongly diminished with respect to the previous case Fig. both in the numerical and the experimental signals Fig.2. and 325 Hz appear besides the BPF at 250 Hz with comparable amplitudes. both 3D numerical and experimental with the fan operating at the BEP = 0. In this position. The agreement between experimental and numerical results is especially good in the axial position z / B = 0. especially in the axial position z / B = 0.35. the interaction between the impeller and the volute tongue does not appear. The amplitude of the pressure ﬂuctuation increases with the ﬂow rate in this case. some peaks at 275 Hz. The numerical and experimental amplitudes coincide in the axial position z / B = 0. On the other hand.15 is very close to the impeller hub and it is not easy to simulate precisely the small axial gap between the impeller and the volute rear casing. an impact test demonstrated that the vibration signal at 300 Hz was due to a casing resonance caused by the excitation of a natural frequency. These pressure ﬂuctuations are generated by the interaction between the unsteady ﬂow leaving the impeller and the ﬁxed volute tongue. The passing of the ten blades in front of the selected position is clearly observed.192.15. First of all. great peak and broadband amplitudes at low frequencies appear in the experimental spectra. the power spectra of pressure ﬂuctuations at Points P02 2 deg from the tongue . The amplitude of the pressure ﬂuctuation at this point diminishes strongly with respect to the precedent case. Moreover. z / B = 0. see http://www. In order to clarify the origin of the peaks observed at 275 Hz. In Position P10 180 deg from the tongue .org/terms/Terms_Use. The amplitudes at the BPF are quite similar in the experimental and the numerical spectra. the situation is quite different Fig. Vol. corresponding to the impeller rotational frequency. thus indicating its mechanical origin. noticeable amplitudes are also present due to the jet-wake pattern associated with the continuous blade rotation around the volute. 11. 300 Hz. z / B = 0. 15 . 300 Hz. The passing of the blades is still clearly observed in the numerical results and the amplitude of the pressure ﬂuctuations is similar to the experimental ones. In the rest of the volute. The peak corresponding to the BPF exhibits high amplitude in Position P02 near the volute tongue. 10 Sketch of the fan with the measurement points at 2 deg from the tongue. the experimental signals show other sources of pressure ﬂuctuation besides the blade passage. However. The origin of these distortions will be discussed later on. The 3D-numerical model can reproduce in a reasonable way the trend and the order of magnitude of the pressure ﬂuctuations obtained experimentally.asme. In this case and for other ﬂow rates tested 12 .40. The numerical code has reproduced in a reasonable way both the order of magnitude and the temporal pattern of the pressure ﬂuctuations found experimentally.30 have been represented. in the experimental spectra important broadband levels at low frequencies appear.40 are similar and slightly different in z / B = 0.

e. pressure ﬂuctuations of the “acoustic type.02 0.01 P02-BEP-EXP P02-BEP-NUM 0. On the other hand. 11 Evolution of volute pressure ﬂuctuations with time at Point P02 „at the tongue. The maximum length of the noise source corresponding to a Transactions of the ASME Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156.. z / B = 0.e.asme. the authors acknowledge that these errors in the volute pressure ﬂuctuations could result in errors in the computed far-ﬁeld noise. which solve the unsteady compressible Navier–Stokes equations. the noise sources are assumed compact. In any case.2.192. i. exceeds by far the current computational capabilities. which would be possibly overcome with a greater computational capability. the presented results permit to conclude that the 3D-numerical methodology developed is a useful tool for the unsteady simulation of the threedimensional ﬂow in a centrifugal fan.” which cannot be calculated in the threedimensional simulation. and the quadrupole noise associated with ﬂow turbulences. Also.org/terms/Terms_Use. Aeroacoustic Noise Prediction. The application of this method to other alternative geometries would permit to establish design criteria for the improvement of the aerodynamic performance of these machines. especially near the volute tongue.80 Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 0 0.04 t [s] Fig. The present numerical study does not account for the inﬂuence of the casing on the noise. comes for the contribution of three types of sources: the monopole noise related to the blade moving volume i. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. the dipole noises related to the forces pressures exerted on the surface of the blades. which has not been correctly captured by the numerical procedure..cfm .02 0.04 t [s] 80 P02-1. the solution of the inhomogeneous wave equation following Ffowcs–Williams–Hawkings approach. SEPTEMBER 2008 in the unsteady ﬂow numerical simulation constitute the basis for a second step in which the sound ﬁeld will be computed by a numerical solution of an appropriate system of acoustic equations based on the acoustic analogy of Lighthill. see http://www. Some other differences are probably due to the presence of ﬂow separation in the blade channels at partial load. It is well known that the sound pressure p .03 0. and as a result the predicted far-ﬁeld noise could differ from the experimentally measured noise. The sound pressure generated from the impeller blades and the volute tongue is predicted by the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation 3 .01 0. since the compact noise source conditions suggested by Farassat 16 are satisﬁed. blade thickness . the results obtained 091102-6 / Vol.35. i.e. 130.30… results corresponding to low values of z / B are slightly different. In this work.35xBEP-EXP P02-1. Regardless the exposed constraints.35xBEP-NUM Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 0 0. The computation of pressure ﬂuctuations of the acoustic type by CFD codes. the later contribution is neglected because the ﬂow Mach number of the fan is low.03 0.. Another source of discrepancies between the 3D-numerical and the experimental pressure ﬂuctuations can be taken into account: the feasibility that the microphones placed on the volute wall measure noise from distant zones of the ﬂow. The integration surfaces of the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings calculation are the ten impeller blades and the volute tongue.

30… grid section along the blades and tongue is much smaller than the minimum distance between the noise source and the observer considered and the time step that takes for a sound wave to cross that maximum length is also much smaller than the period of the BPF.t + p ff. see http://www.02 P10-1.2.i x.i x.01 0.t = 1 4 1 1 ri 1 − M r 2 ri · fi ri Mi ri fi · + · c0 1 − M r c0 8c p x. If the rotation speed is low or the blade geometry is thin. As it was stated before. The local source Mach number vector and the relative Mach number are also deﬁned as SEPTEMBER 2008.cfm . V0 is the blade volume.t = i=1 p th.35xBEP-NUM 0. z / B = 0. and fi is the force vector acting onto the ﬂuid. Using the compact noise source formula given by Cho and Moon 5 and the geometric parameters shown in Fig.35xBEP-EXP P10-1. Vol. 0 is the density of the undisturbed medium. c0 is the speed of sound.i x.03 0.t 7 where x is a position vector to the observer and t is the observer time. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright.8 Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 0 0.04 t [s] Fig. contributions of n noise sources are added as the following: n p fn.t = 0V 0 4 1 1 − Mr 1 1 − Mr 1 ri 1 − M r 8a In Eqs.org/terms/Terms_Use. which is related to the observer time. 8a – 8c . monopole sources are expected to be a negligible contribution.03 0. Following Ref.04 t [s] 8 Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 0 0.t + p fn.asme. 15 .35. ri = x − yi / ri is a unit vector from the noise source i to the observer. by means of the expression ri c0 =t− 9 x. the ﬁrst term represents the monopole noise related to the displacement of ﬂuid due to the motion of the blades.i x.i x. each term is written as p th. 8a – 8c are evaluated at a retarded time . The second and third terms are the near-ﬁeld and far-ﬁeld dipole noises related to the time varying forces acting on the ﬂuid. t. 12 Evolution of volute pressure ﬂuctuations with time at Point P10 „180 deg from the tongue.t = 1 4 1 1 ri2 1 − M r 2 ri · fi 1 − Mi · Mi − fi · Mi 1 − Mr 8b p fn.192.i The terms in the square brackets of Eqs.01 0.02 P10-BEP-EXP P10-BEP-NUM 0. 130 / 091102-7 Journal of Fluids Engineering Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. 17.

The ﬁgure also shows that the data are symmetric in the 5 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 4 3 2 1 0 5 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 4 3 2 1 0 3D: z/B=0. see http://www.15 and z / B = 0. bottom side… at the measurement Point P02 „at 2 deg from the tongue.70 BEP.org/terms/Terms_Use. In this ﬁgure.cfm .192. y .40 EXP: z/B=0. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright.35. 3Dnumerical simulation. it can be seen that the directivity pattern of the acoustic source is similar to the dipole source. During the measurements of the SPL around the fan.40….15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 25 20 15 10 5 0 25 20 15 10 5 0 3D: z/B=0. Aeroacoustic Results. and x . bottom side… at the measurement Point P06 „at 60 deg from the tongue. t is calculated at the observer time t using the described aeroacoustic noise prediction procedure. These measure- ments were made for the following ﬂow rates: 1.2.40 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 Fig. 13 Power spectra of volute pressure ﬂuctuations in pascals „experimental.70 BEP and Qmax. upper side. z / B = 0. 3Dnumerical simulation. the latter is the ﬂow rate obtained when neither plate nor duct is connected at the fan exit. The origin of this coordinate system is placed on the rotation axis at the impeller hub. 0 . In order to have a more comprehensive outlook of the results. with the fan operating at the BEP Mi = 1 yi . the exit duct was not used. 0 . Thus. the algorithm was applied to observer points placed in the following planes: x . with the fan operating at the BEP 091102-8 / Vol. this ﬂow rate was not reachable when the fan was connected to the normalized test installation. y .15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 3D: z/B=0.asme. Figure 18 shows a picture of the studied fan and the Cartesian coordinates used. in Fig. z / B = 0. For instance.15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] EXP: z/B=0. upper side. 130. c0 M r = ri · Mi 10 where yi is a position vector to the noise source i. SEPTEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. z . 19 the total SPL is represented over those planes for the ﬂow rate corresponding to 1. Obviously.40 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 Fig.40 EXP: z/B=0. z . a calibrated plate was used to obtain the desired ﬂow rate.15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] EXP: z/B=0. The acoustic pressure p x .40…. 0 .25 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 20 15 10 5 0 25 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 20 15 10 5 0 3D: z/B=0. The sound pressure level SPL spectrum is obtained by a fast-Fourier transform FFT algorithm. 14 Power spectra of volute pressure ﬂuctuations in pascals „experimental.15 and z / B = 0.

asme.15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 3D: z/B=0. Vol. 130 / 091102-9 Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156.40….35.2. z / B = 0. with the fan operating at the BEP Journal of Fluids Engineering SEPTEMBER 2008. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. see http://www.40 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency [Hz] 500 600 700 Fig.5 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 4 3 2 1 0 5 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] 4 3 2 1 0 3D: z/B=0. 15 Power spectra of volute pressure ﬂuctuations in pascals „experimental. 3Dnumerical simulation. with the fan operating at the BEP Fig.40 EXP: z/B=0.15 Wall Pressure Fluctuation [Pa] EXP: z/B=0.192.cfm . upper side. bottom side… at the measurement Point P10 „at 180 deg from the tongue.15 and z / B = 0. 16 Amplitude „pascals… of volute pressure ﬂuctuation at the blade passing frequency. 3D-numerical „white squares… and experimental „dotted line….org/terms/Terms_Use.

see http://www. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. 19 Predicted SPL „decibels… around the fan: „a… plane „x . the acoustic ﬁeld radiated by the centrifugal fan has been measured over the mentioned planes. 21 shows the measured SPL decibels around the fan in the plane x .org/terms/Terms_Use. y . in order to obtain the power spectra of the pressure signals.asme. 18 Picture of the fan during the acoustic measurements tude. y . The signal from the microphone was introduced into a real time frequency analyzer B&K 2133. the agreement between the predicted and the measured SPL distributions in the vicinity of the fan is reasonable. Also.2 dB. particularly in the vicinity of the fan. 0 . and decay with distance could be related to the overprediction of volute pressure ﬂuctuations and to the neglect of the casing inﬂuence in the aeroacoustic computations. with a conﬁdence level of 95%. microphone. Figure 22 shows the comparison between the predicted and the measured SPL decibels along an x-constant line on the plane Transactions of the ASME 091102-10 / Vol. ﬂow rate: BEP Fig.Fig. Comparison is only made at the BPF because an experimental study on the determination of the noise sources in the same fan 17 showed that the component was predominant in the noise generation of the fan. z planes. 0 plane. and „c… plane „0 . y . The dipolar behavior can be appreciated in the experimental results. SEPTEMBER 2008 Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. z…. „b… plane „x . particularly in the vicinity of the fan. The discrepancies in symmetry. 17 Geometric parameters used in the Ffowcs Williams– Hawkings equation 0 .2.cfm . The dipolar behavior can also be appreciated for this ﬂow rate. 0 . y . Fig. due to the fact that the geometry of the centrifugal fan is not symmetric in the latter plane. 0 . The acoustic pressure measurements have been made using a B&K 4189 1 / 2 in.70 BEP. Only the reﬂection on the pavement ﬂoor inﬂuenced the experimental measurements. z…. Given the approximations made. peak ampli- a) b) c) Fig. In the experimental results. The comparison of Figs. a higher sound pressure level is obtained in further positions of the fan due to the pavement reﬂection and to the noise background level that is not present in the numerical results. In order to eliminate the inﬂuence of the reﬂections of the laboratory walls. z for the ﬂow rate corresponding to Qmax. but the background noise was still very high around 50 dB and it masked the ﬂoor inﬂuence for positions further than 2 m from the fan.192. with a 1 / 24 octave band resolution. These features also mask the dipolar behavior in the experimental results. the fan was placed outside the building. z for the ﬂow rate corresponding to 1. Also. 20 b and 21 shows that the strength of the dipole increases when the ﬂow rate increases. but it is not in the x . 0….35. 130. Figure 20 shows the comparison between the predicted a and the measured b SPL decibels at the BPF around the fan in the plane x . The uncertainty of the microphone was established by the manufacturer in 0. z and x . 0 .

cfm . ﬂow rate: 1. ﬂow rate: 1. 0 . 0 . z…: „a… x = 0. z…. España . plane „x . Vol. and the background noise signiﬁcantly affect the experimental results. 22 Predicted „full line… and measured „dotted line… SPLs „decibels… along a line on the plane „x .2. The forces exerted by the fan blades on the air obtained from an unsteady viscous ﬂow computation are used as input data for the calculation of the acoustic pressure around the fan.70Ã BEP: „a… predicted and „b… measured x . see http://www. 20 SPL „decibels… at the blade passing frequency around the fan. It has also been observed that the strength of the dipole increases when the ﬂow rate increases. Nomenclature B C1 . a previously published aeroacoustic prediction methodology 5 has been extended to three-dimensional turbulent ﬂow in order to predict the noise generated by a centrifugal fan using the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings model extension of Lighthill’s analogy.org/terms/Terms_Use. 21 Measured SPL „decibels… at the blade passing frequency around the fan. In both lines the results agree in the vicinity of the fan. which are not present in the numerical results. This methodology could be applied in the design stage in order to optimize the aeroacoustic behavior of centrifugal fans.192. the agreement between the predicted and the measured SPL distributions in the vicinity of the fan is reasonable.5 m. and DPI2001-2598 Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. TRA2004-04269. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. The experimental results were inﬂuenced by the pavement reﬂection and the noise background level.(a) a) (b) Fig.35. the effects of the motor casing and the ﬂoor reﬂection.model diameter speed of sound frequency force vector acting onto the ﬂuid SEPTEMBER 2008. ﬂow rate: Qmax Journal of Fluids Engineering Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. Conclusions b) Fig.70Ã BEP tions from the fan. Both the predicted and the measured SPL at the BPF around the fan show a dipolar behavior. 130 / 091102-11 Fig. In further posi- In this study. z…. z for the ﬂow rate corresponding to 1.70 BEP. 0 . C2 .asme. These features also mask the dipolar behavior in the experimental results.5 m and „b… x = 1. 0 . plane „x . Given the approximations made. C D c0 f fi volute width parameters of the standard k. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the Research Projects TRA200762708.

.. 2006. J. 1999. Fluids Eng.cfm . and Santolaria-Morros. 1025–1035.. Soc. 19. J. 268.. 367–384. 1992.. pp. Y.” J. and Santolaria-Morros. 1969. London. P. 348–355. 265. J.. 125. Sound Vib. 221–230. Subscripts/superscripts max maximum ﬂow rate th thickness ff far ﬁeld fn near ﬁeld 091102-12 / Vol. France.” Comput..... pp.Gk k M Mi Mr p p0 p PT Q ri ri SPL t ui V0 x yi x y z t 0 k.. Sound Vib. and Nam. Santolaria-Morros. “Analysis of the Aeroacoustic Characteristics of the Centrifugal Fan in a Vacuum Cleaner. Velarde-Suárez.model retarded time stress tensor total pressure coefﬁcient = PT / 2D2 angular velocity References 1 Neise. “Computation of Unsteady Viscous Flow and Aeroacoustic Noise of Cross Flow Fans. Baek. 13 Launder. “Sound Generation by Turbulence and Surfaces in Arbitrary Motion. S. Fluids Eng. pp.. 2002. Fernández. Y.. W. 130... S. pp. 32.. pp. “Aeroacoustic Performance Evaluation of Axial Flow Fans Based on the Unsteady Pressure Field on the Blade Surface. Ser. and Santolaria. Y.. 1980.” Philos. and Kim. Mathematical Models of Turbulence. C. Baek. J.. C. J. “Discrete Noise Prediction of Variable Pitch Cross-Flow Fans by Unsteady Navier-Stokes Computations.192.” J. 121. Sound Vib.. A. Senlis. and Rey.. 2003. R. and Ballesteros-Tajadura. “Determination of Sound Power Radiated Into a Duct by Fans and Other Air-Moving Devices. H. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright. Y.asme.. 4 Jeon. Blanco.. 1122–1130. 65. P. R. SPL= 20 log p / p0 dB. Eq. R. “Experimental Determination of the Tonal Noise Sources in a Centrifugal Fan.. S. 2004. 295. see http://www.. pp. 2006. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Fluids. 8 ISO 5136:2003... 2003. S. 3 Ffowcs Williams.35. D...org/terms/Terms_Use. and Spalding. 91-0216. Fluids Eng. 121. L. Fluids Eng.. 1981.. 17 Velarde-Suárez. W. E.... B. “Experimental Determination of the Tonal Noise Sources in a Centrifugal Fan. Ballesteros-Tajadura. E.” 9 Velarde-Suárez. 5 density density of the undisturbed medium parameters of the standard k. S. Santolaria-Morros.” J. C. Cho. J.” ASME J. “Numerical Simulation of the Dynamic Effects Due to Impeller-Volute Interaction in a Centrifugal Pump. and Moon. S. New York. 11 González. 2003. and Kim.... 781–796. and Hurtado-Cruz. 995–1015. 543–550. F.” Appl. 6 Moon. B.” J. 16 Farassat.” AIAA J. Eq. W.” ASME J. 12 Ballesteros-Tajadura. 7 Maaloum. 2003.. 128. J. J. “Linear Acoustic Formulas for Calculation of Rotating Blade Noise.. pp. “Experience With Two-Layer Models Combining the kModel With a One-Equation Model Near the Wall. C. 15 Patankar... D.” AIAA Paper No. 2 Jeon. 10 Velarde-Suárez. 321–342. 295.. SEPTEMBER 2008 Transactions of the ASME Downloaded 01 Sep 2008 to 156. Hurtado-Cruz. reference 20 Pa observer time velocity component in direction i blade volume position vector of the observer position vector of the noise source i Cartesian coordinate Cartesian coordinate Cartesian coordinate dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy ﬂow coefﬁcient = Q / D3 turbulent viscosity. 1972. A. C. 5 Cho. 264. pp. ij rate of production of the turbulent kinetic energy. “A Numerical Study on the Effects of Design Parameters on the Performance and Noise of a Centrifugal fan.. 6 turbulent kinetic energy Mach number local source Mach number vector relative Mach number static pressure reference acoustic pressure 20 Pa acoustic pressure total pressure ﬂow rate unit vector from the noise source i to the observer modulus of r sound pressure level. 276–281. Ballesteros-Tajadura.. 1991. S. Sound Vib. Acoust. 781–796.. E. Trans. P.” ASME J. pp.” Proceedings of FAN NOISE Symposium. pp. 359–369. In-Duct Method. W. 14 Rodi. pp. “Experimental Study on the Aeroacoustic Behavior of a Forward-Curved Centrifugal Fan. V. C. “Review of Fan Noise Generation Mechanisms and Control Methods. CETIATCETIM. R. R. Academic.” ASME J. and Hawkings. London.... S. 2006.. R. C... Kouidri. pp.2.. Hemisphere. “Numerical Calculation of Pressure Fluctuations in the Volute of a Centrifugal Fan. Hurtado-Cruz.

Electropolishing-TheBenefitsOfElectropolishing

Best Practices in Pro-E

Design Verification White Paper

Article - Screw Threads Design

Technical Writing

Common Machining Processes

Fan Vibrations

Surface Modeling Proe Wf 2

historicaldocuments_kashmir

- Read and print without ads
- Download to keep your version
- Edit, email or read offline

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

CANCEL

OK

You've been reading!

NO, THANKS

OK

scribd

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->