This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMITTAL
1 . ~ 0 ~
4. Related ED7
Ooeration Eauioment . .
6 . Design Authority/ Design Agent/Cog. Engr.:
7. Purchase Drdar NO. :
TWRS Interim Stabilization Engineering
H. H. Ziada
9 . Eguip./Conponent NO.:
This EDT Transmits the Release o f the Supporting Document HNF-3286, Rev. 0
11. Receiver Remarks: 11A. Design Baseline Docunent?
12. Major Asam. Dug. No.:
13. Permit/Permit Application No.:
I1 DocumsntiDrawingNo. S
DATA TRANSMITTED I1 C ID) Sheet Re".
IEl M a or Dascdption 01 Data
Transmmsd Approval Di .p
Reason tor Tnnimittai
O+# nator DIspo-
Design Analysis o f 2.000 lb. Jib Crane
Appmval Oasignator I1 F
E. S, ( . D or NIA 1
Reaeon far T r . n ~ m ~ a l ~ Q l 4. Review 2 . Release 5 . Poat-Review 3. information 6. Diit. IRecdpt AEknow. Requiredl
1 . Approval
DIwadtbn (HI & (I1
1. Appmved 2. Appmvad wlmmmmt 3. Dhppravad w/Eommml 4. Reviewed noleomment 6. Reviewedwlsomrnsnt 6, Rscolpt afknowledged
Sionotura of EOT Originator
for Receiving Orgmlzatlon
HNF-3286, Rev. 0
Design Analysis of 2,000 Lb. Jib Crane for Chemical Lab
H. H. Ziada Numatec Hanford Corporation, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200
EDT/ECN: 625110 Org Code: 82600 B&R Code: EW3120071
uc: 2000 Charge Code: T o t a l Pages:
Key Words: J i b Crane, Chemical Lab, 200 East, Design Analysis, H o i s t i n g and Rigging, Tank Farms. A b s t r a c t : T h i s design a n a l y s i s provides a design ( M a t e r i a l s , s i z e s , and dimensions) o f a 2,000 l b . J i b Crane t o be i n s t a l l e d i n t h e 200 East Tank Farms Chemical Lab (MO-733) t o r e p l a c e an e x i s t i n g 1,0001b. J i b Crane.
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference h e r e i n t o any s p e c i f i c c m r c i a l prcduct, process, o r s e r v i c e by t r a d e name, trademark, manufacturer, o r otherwise, does n o t n e c e s s a r i l y c o n s t i t u t e or imply i t s endorserent, recamendation, o r favoring by the United States G o v e r m n t o r any agency thereof o r i t s c o n t r a c t o r s o r subcontractors. P r i n t e d i n t h e United States of America. lo o b t a i n copies of t h i s docunent, contact: D o c M m t Control Services, P.O. Box 950, Mailstop H6-OB, Richland UA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420; Fax (509) 376-4989.
Approved for Public Release
A-6400-073 (01197) GEF321
Limits checked against sources. DQ 1 1 [ I pa ga 1 1 [ I w JKl [ I [ I pl [ I [ I L . Results and conclusions address all points required in the problem statement. Data checked for consistency with original source information as applicable. - Rev. p4 [ I [ I 11 [ I Hand calculations checked for errors. Julyk Reviewer . Models appropriate and used within range of validity or use outside range of established validity justified w [ I [ I [ I fA [ I w pa [ I [ I 11 [ I . Data used in calculations explicitly stated in document. Code output consistent with input and with results reported in analysis documentation. Ziada Y e s m u Da [ I [ I MI 1 1 [ I [ I [ I ba Problem completely defined. Safety margins consistent with good engineering practices. Necessary assumptions explicitly stated and supported. J.0001bf Jib Crane for Chemical Lab Document No. Computer codes and data files documented. 0 H.CHECKLIST FOR INDEPENDENT REVIEW Document Reviewed Desiqn Analysis of 2. Author HNF-3286 H. Conclusions consistent with analytical results and applicable 1 imi ts. Code run streams correct and consistent with analysis documentation. Acceptability limits on analytical results applicable and supported. Mathematical derivations checked including dimensional consistency of results.
Ziada January 1999 . H. Jib Crane for Chemical Lab H.000 lb.HNF-3286. Rev. 0 Design Analysis of 2.
5 6.4 5.0 ANALYSIS 4 4 5 5.0 4.1 1 1 2 3. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .1 5.0 2 LOADING ALLOWABLE STRESSES AND LOADS 2 2 4.3 7 5.HNF-3286 Rev.0 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONFIGURATION AND MATERIAL LOADING AND CRITERIA 4.2 JIB CRANE BOOM HINGE BRACKETS HINGE PIN WELDS ANALYSIS RESULTS 5.O 2.2 5.0 9 11 REFERENCES 12 .
All 2. The recommended weld material is ETOXX.000 Ibf jib crane (L-shape) in the lab. -:LoamlK L.The pln of each hinge shall be a minimum of l-in. or stronger. After construction.000 Ibf jib crane as proposed In thk document.and dimensions are based on the deslgn factor of 5 spedtkd in DOE (1993). After prellminatystudies and discussions.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommended materials.Numatec Hanford Corp.000 Ibf jib crane to be replaced (about 5-R apart) shall be uwd In connecting the new jib crane to the wall. and a supporting rod is attached to the upper bracket. EVALUATIONANALYSIS a u k . Sketches of the proposedjib crane assembly are shown in Figures 14. and the guidelines provided in AlSC (1989). If the final as-built assembly is different from the proposed sizes. 4.000 Ibf jib crane in the Chemical Lab (Building -733). The vertical I-beam is to be attached to the lower two exisling brackets to support the jib crane to the wall.The L-shaped jib crane is recommendedto be constructed from I-beam size W 12x40 (as minimum &e). The crane is attached to the wall through The edsting I two brackets (about 8 ID-R apart).000 lbfjib crane to determine suitable hs sizes of members and configuration of the new jib crane assembly.b Doc No. thick plate at the hole region. sizes. Final drawings should be developed and approved.000 Ibf jib crane (L-shape) or stiffer (see Figure 1) . 2. a revision of this analysis needs to be performed to confirm the acceptability of the as-built assembly.structural materialsare recommended to be carbon steel A36 (ASTM 1097) and the pin material to be A325 steel. Ifthe as-built assembly differs from the 2.OOO Ibf jib crane (to be replaced) has a 1 7 4 boom (I-beam).O A 2.000 Ibf jib crane is needed to replace an edsting 1. 5.000 IMJIB CRANE FOR CHEMICAL LAB I INTRODUCTIONAND OBJECTIVE . diameter and made of A325 material. a revision of this analysis needs to be performed to confirm the acceptability of the as-built structure. 3. and conllguration.The edsting lower two brackets of the 1. The boom is attached to the lower bracket. 6-All welds shall be fillet welds with the sizes shown in Fgures 14. . I. This construction is to be similar to another exisling 1. crane is to be supported on the wall through the t o The w lower edsting brackets (about 5-R apart). The boom is to be 20-R long cantilever (the horizontal Cbeam). The purof t i document is to perform a deslgn analysis for the proposed 2. I . ~ O ev: DESIGN ANALYSIS OF 2. This will provides total thickness of l-in. The thickness of the upper and lower brackets of each support should be strengthened by a IR-in. N F a R. It was decided to construct the new jib crane fmm two perpedlcular I-beams (L-shape) without a supporting rod (see Figure I). The supporting rod is attached to the boom at about 8 4 fmm the free end.dimenslons.The assembly of the L-shaped I-beams and hinge connectionsshall be similar to that of the other exlsting 1. for each bracket to satisfy the DOE (1993) stress allowable (see Figure 2) .v*ion: 4 I d W O N o b N o .
and gives allowable shear stress more conservative than the AlSC ratlo of 0.333 Ibflin). Ratio of shear stress to tensile stress allowables = FvFt = 0. HNFJZas 3. thick plate at the hole region on the outer upper and lower horlzontal surfaces.8 the yield strength.ting lower hinge brackets.000Ibflinz.577 (thus 0.9m. Ratio of beating stress to tensile stress allowable3 = FpFt = 0.The crane l constructed of two perpendicular I-beams. The brackets are welded to the wall by a 1IUn.0 LOADING AND CRITERIA The evaluation is based on the general construction and installation requirement8 of Hanford SIb Ho#ing end w i n g Manual (DOE 1893).0 CONFIGURATIONAND MATERIAL -- EVALUATIONANALYSIS R.8 = I . the ratios between the different stress allowables in AlSC (1889) can be applied to determine the shear and beating stress allowables in comparison to the tenslle stress allowable. thus. From AlSC (1888).2 ALLOWABLE STRESSES AND LOADS The allowable sr tand loads are based on the deslgn factor of 5 on the ultlmate tensile strength of the mstehl (DOE 1993).000 Ibflln2.88 (see below). the allowable tensile stress (Ft) is 0. 4. all around Illletweld. see nekl page) Allowable shear stress Allowable beating stress .577 is used to obtain Fv). The yield strength of the A36 material is 38.4 the yield strength.and the allowable bearing stress (Fp) is 0. The yield and ultimate strengths of the A325 material are 92. thick plate.0001bf jib crane is illustrated in Fbure I. The boom (horkontal part) has a 20-R effecthre arm. which is condste~nt nrith ductile material behavior. The jib crane la attach4 to the two exk. and the guidelines provided in the Manual of Steel Construction.1 Allowable Stresses for Structural Components (A38 Material) Ibf Fu :I SSOC0.1 LOADING The loadlng on the 20-R boom (cantilever) is the jib crane rated load of 2. 4.577 of the tensile strength (Von-Msen Criteria).000 lbfAnz. The structural material of the new componenb is selected to be carbon steel A36.Numatec Hanford Corp.6 = 0. 4. A sketch of the modified bracket is illustrated in Fbure 2. and the boom (W 12x40 I-beam) distributed weight of 40 lbflft (3.577.the allowable &ear stress (Fv) la 0. The boom weight is considered because It has dgniRcant contrlbullon t the o bending moment.000 Ibf. The shear strength is taken as 0. Allowable Sr D d g n (AISC tm 1989).R in2 Fv = 6693 *-Ibf in2 Fp = 174OO. which are selected to be slze W 12x40 (stronger slzes can also be used but the beam weight should not exceed 70 Ibflft). respecthrely. and the mlnlmum ultimate tensile strength is 58. Because the the jib crane is a steel structure.4/0.8 of the yield strength.88 > 0.5 4.2. and the pin material la to be A325 (ASTM 1997).Ibf in2 L Allowable bending stress @nslle end compredw.in2 F :=-Fu t 5 Ibf F =11600*t FV := 0. Doc No.vwon: 9- a The coniigurahn of the proposed L-shaped 2.000 lbfllnZand 120. The brackets are modified by the addition of a IR-in. The edrting h m e brackets are made of I M n .
coefficient depends on end moments ratio. I n Ibf c 2 := 12lxmxQ.02). (107. When the unbraced length L The AlSC ( is greater than a specified value (defined below). Ibf a := lS3LXCOCOO- Dummy units for a constant given in the following equation.WGO laeuiML00 M . and loaded in the plane of their web.14. ' T F Y When L (24041.d: By: The allowable compressive bending stress depends on the slenderness ratio ( r of the flexural member (I-beam).23< 112.C1 -----(2) Fh. ' :=2.33-in.3.9. b f =&in Flange width Lc = 76x8/6 = 101. Dummy units for a constant given in the following equation.600 Ibfhr? is used for allowable tension and compression bending stresses. EVALUATION ANALYSIS cli.Numatec Hanford Cop. Section F I.=17241*2 in lbf Second compressive bending stress allowable Both F k l and Fk2 values of the above two equations are greater than Ft.in2 1 CI=d/Af. the allowable compressive bending stress is determined as the larger value from the following two equations.u b j a c t : p h l Lab 3d WON& No. provides formulas for different cases of slenderness ratio. Radius of gyration of compression flange plus 1/3 of compressionweb.b f in2 Yield strength " & L :=240. r h ~ s *: : Ravh. V. in2 r : For any value of U.. of 101. 9 /b ' Z A . Cb:=l For cantilever beams.) and I/rT (112.33-h. J . the allowable compressive bending stress for the W 12x40 I-beam is calculated in accordance with the following formulas of AlSC (1989). . JiNF-3208 Revidom PageNo..in T _-112 ' T For flexural memberswith compact or noncompactsections. from I-beam properties tables in AlSC (1989).) exceeds L. ) I 989).15) is between the above values.(53. 51oooo'cb The beam satisfies the following condition. greater than L. and with unbraced lengths greater than Lc with an eds of symmetryin. ratio of depth to flange area (AISC 1989).nt: S Doc No.mildim . FbcZ :=- C2.15< 119. -M.33 in Ibf Fy =36WO- L =- 76.c b L.in (where Fy is 36 kips) Beam length. Therefore. a w . C1 :=2. Ft of 11.: mm w ~ r HM. 0m L M . the allowable bending stress in compression (Fk) is shown below.
L+-w.1 JIB CRANE BOOM (W 12X 40 I-BEAM) The bending moment is calculated for the 2.Ftp ~ 5. fillet weld. F :=0. in 4.5.Fvw . - lbf Ultimate strength of pin material in2 Ftp :=-fuP 5 Ftp = 24000 lbf e - in2 in2 Allowable bending stress for pin Allowable shear stress for pin F v :=0.0 ANALYSIS Ibf F~p=13848*- I The analysiswas performed by conventional hand calculations using formulas from Roark (1975).= 3. n n s i l Lab Loation: p c z * g e R e By: L.707. specifies the following shear stress allowables for fillet welds.33 Ibfhnfor the I-beam).vi. Ricker (Iggl). EVALUATlONANALYSIS cl n.600 Ibf/in2.2 Allowable Shear Stress for Fillet Weld Assume the weld electrode material is E70XX.333333. Shigley.3 x Fu weld = 0. (from the wall).25. ia t : Suy.E (40 Ibf/fI of I-beam) L :=240.2.Numatec Hanford Cop. 4.2.000 Ibf/in2 Allowable shear stress for tension or compression parallel to axis of weld = same as base metal To be consistent with DOE (1993) and the derivation of the base metal allowables in the preceding sections.lbf w . The AISC (1989).577.000 Ibf at 240411. Thk moment k consewalive for the boom and its weld connection to the box.t w. WON& No.Sin3 M Ob :=S Bending stress is less than bending stress allowable of 11.L2 2 in M =576oOo*in~lbf Modulus of section Moment at bed end S := 5 1 . Fvw :=Fv t Fvw = 6693 a - Ibf Allowable shear stress for weld :=0. and Blodgett (1982). P =2000. 4 .in F = 1 I83 in2 Ibf -Allowable shear stress (per linear inch) for 1/4-in. Table J2.3 Allowable Stresses for Pin (A325 Material) fup := 1 2 ~ . ILCLE-328s R.ct: Doc No.c. 5. Allowable shear stress for shear on effective area = 0. the allowable shear stress for welds will be taken as the base metal allowables (consenrative).000 = 21. JilWGO 4 d /6 IW Jib C 733.in M :=P. Bruhn (965). end for the distributed weight of the boom (~3.3 x 70.lon: PageNo.
lbf) produces a couple that generates action and reaction forces (F) in the two brackets. The modified bracket configuration is presentedin Figure 2. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Da No. The welded plates need to follow the contour of the brackets and to allow sufficientdistances from the outside edges to facilitate the welding on the outside of the added plate (no weld on the hole surface).n i The modified bracket is 1&. 1. e ~!LL&&- 5. 5. (see mure below). and the side distance from the hole to the edge is about 1. It is recommendedto strengthen the brackets by welding (0.).2. Ricker (1991).25in. 5.F A Pt Force on bracket lbf f t =4800*- in2 Tensile stress is less than 11. The moment M (576.Tension failure at sides of hole. and tearing tension failures.600 Ibfln2allowable stress. and Shigiey (1983) have slightly different approaches in dealing with shear. in order to satisfy the shear and bearing stress allowables. 5 .2 HINGE BRACKETS The results of a preliminaryanalysis indicatedthat the brackets (at the pin hole region) need to be thicker than the original thickness of 0.Bearing failure. = I.5in. O h . The bracket at the hole region should be checked for the follohhg failure modes. t thick. 2.5in. 3. bearing.1 Tension Failure .Compliance with dishing failure. The distance between the centerlines of the brackets is 5-R (60-in.h Plate thickness Side length for tension stress Tension area Distance between brackets M F :=_ L1 F = 9600 -1bf f t :=.0.Numatec Hanford Corp. HtiF-3288 RdJon: PapNo.000 in.Double shear failure. Bruhn (1965). plate to the upper and lower outermost horizontal surfaces of each bracket at the hole region. 4.Tearing tension failure or hoop tension failure. fillet weld) a 0.
t Bearing area '=. a) Shigley (19830 states that this failure is avolded by spacing the hole at least I diameter from the margin (edge).5 I.- Ibf in2 Shear stress is less than allowable shear stress of 6.vkd: 5.O.e 1 2 6 s=o*in 3 MI =- F. The block performs as a fixed-ends beam (see sketch on previous page).8xd in length.O = I.in Ld=l. . and have the same plate thickness.2 Double Shear Failure L S .lbf 6 . e In height.Mn.5 x 1. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No.O. D s =- t. in* 5. Assume that a block of 0.=l.5 x d = 1. Thus. I b) Ricker (991) assumes that the tear resulted from a bending stress in section between the hole and the boundary.h Pin diameter Apb :=D.F P' A Pb fp=9600--Ibf f Bearing stress k less than 17. .in ' Shear distance to edge Shear area f =4800. Lab R.5 in. distance from the edge. 8 .400 Ibfhn2 allowable bearing stress.2.3 Bearing Failure D := I. Jib CRm & & d W& .k Height or distance to edge Beam length Modulus of section Ld ~ 0 . MF-3288 RevMn: e u i. WOlJob No.Numatec Hanford Corp.in.2.:Subject Lmtiom -No. this k more than 1.2.L d Bending moment M1 8 =960. JlW'GD 3 L s & m. check the tearing tendon failure. e =l.693 Ibfln2.0. 5.4 Tearing Tension Failure This failure occurs when the pin diameter k smaller than the hole diameter.
5.b 7 o ( /6 WON& No. diameter. The bracket does not have enough distance to the front edge to Increase the pin diameter. because the load is not uniform.O.25 the diameter. Besides.ApEFt P ta = 16240 . The bracket satisfies this condition. Preliminarycalculations Indicatedthat the pin should be made out of material stronger than A36 carbon steel. the pin material needs to be A325 or stronger.5 (see curve) . Rniud: f = 5760.Ibf Allowable load k greater than the acting load of 9.A f sp Ibf =6112*- in2 Double shear stress is not conservative. Therefore.2. dishing is not a concern. it is not easy to machinethe bracket hole because it is welded to the wall structure. . 5. c) Bruhn (1965) states that failure due to shear out and bearing (tearing) are closely related and are covered by a single calculation based on empirical cwves.1 l.. Thus. Ap .5Dishing Failure (Out-of-Plane Buckling) 0.3. 5.Nurnatec Hanford Corp. but never less than 0.P U 4.600 Ibfln2. and e/D=l.WNO..0 r5 Ricker (1991) stated that dishing can be prevented by having the plate thickness equal or greater than 0.in2 i 7 Pin area fsp :=.600 Ibf.E l.- Ibf i n 2 Bending stress is less than allowable stress of 11.F 2.1 Shear Stress First assume the pin will fall under double shear.5in. EVALUATIONANALYSIS CIht -% buS + Doc No.4 lbf Ft=11600-in2 Bearing area Shear bearing factor based on t/D4 .1 1.. The allowable load ( P d may be expressed as a function of the allowable stress A pb = 1 . Each pin is subjected to a force of 9.600 Ibf.0 ?.L. Therefore.3 HINGE PIN The existing pin has l-in. diameter. Allowable tensile stress Pta:=Kb. J3NF-3286 uwirlon: P.in 2 K bv := 1.E 2. The pin is checked for shear and bending stresses (the bearing stress is enveloped by the bracket). the pin diameter is restrictedto l i n .. W O O blEdwb Mcx33. 9 - .
2 Bending stress In general static tests of single bolt frttings will not show a failure due to bolt bending failure. b FLP R =9382*Ibf M . This is a conservative representation for thii application. mF-3286 Rddom 9 H crtmt: .848 Ibfhn2allowable shear stress. Subjct: m i a n Page NO. ILS \\ in2 (cle.s.3. Beddes. and the gap between the pin and the hinge on the left is not closed. i k not known l exactly how the load k distributed to the pin nor the relative deformations of the pin and the members. a =0.=R.lbf 32. see sketch below.125in Distancefrom close support (Clearance) Dktance from far support Length of pin between supports (inside of the bracket) b =5.37S.125-in applied on one side.Numatec Hanford COT.a Reactionforce P' Mp=1173*in. Assume simply supported beam with concentrated load as shown in the sketch below.- Single shear stress k less than 13. f spd = I2223 Ibf . D3 Maximum bending moment at point of load fbp-11945'. N l W G O I Mm o . & C I L% WOlJob No.Mp fbp:=II. in* 5. it is important that sufficient bending strength k provided to prevent permanent bending deformation so that bolts can be readily removed in maintenance operations. assume that the rotation of the crane (due to the bending moment) will cause the 9.600 Ibf load to act as a concentrated load on the pin. the pin will be under single shear. However.000 Ibfhnz. L o a t h -s733 -til w: Second. Therefore.in L P =s. with a maximum clearance of 0.Ibf Bending stress k less than the allowable bending stress of 24.in R :. EVALUATION ANALYSIS Doc No.traMte) ket 6 t-ac 8 .
000 Ibf plus the beam weight (see Section 5. The weld that joins the the hinge bracket to the wall is an existing 1/44n.1). = 132. Weld area per unit thickness (5+5+6. The weld dimensions and section properties appear in Figure 3.4.4. A 3/41n.183 lbflin allowable weld stress for 0. fillet weld around the plate ddes (on the bottom). 2 1~24.375) fhw :=. The box-shape is constructed from 3/4-in. thick plate is welded to the top surface of the box and the I-beam by a 3/Bin.15in A.F fhw -422. fillet weld. The two I-beams are connectedtogether through a box-shaped structure as shown In Fbure I The boom is welded to one side of the box-shape structure around b contour. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Clknt. S u w Doc No. 5. . f.=22.h Total weld area Polar moment of inerb'a 9 J \v = 945. thick plateswith the web plate welded to the four dde plates by a 5/%n. Bottom weld (at point "a") is the critical location.i~~ .1 Welds of Hinge Support This is an ehting l/din. V:=P+wL V = 2800 4bf f.Numatec Hanford Corp.25411.600 Ibf (load per bracket to react the moment).375+6.6. I Lab WolJDb No. M H G D me: i w i m pJULLA ~ y : By: Location: avlldirn Mm LakJWE Area Hanfofd. assuming only one support carries the shear load V A.2 Welds Connecting Boom (I-Beam) to Box . Ibf in Shear stress (per linear length) for shear load f Ibf . Washinaton o 5.Ibf Shear stress (per linear length) for tension load in The shear load 01) on the weld is the 2. fillet weld. The other welds are to be sized to support the crane loads. 5. A. fillet welds on both sides. MF-3286 urvh(on: . fillet weld (see Figure 2).32.440-= in Resultant shear stress (per linear length) is less than 1. The welds were evaluated according to formulas obtained from Blcdgett (1982) and the guidelines of AlSC (1989).ICI J ib -No.4WELDS This section evaluatesthe welds of the crane assembly.:=- Shear force. A . The normal load on the weld is 9.
5 4 3Welds in Box-Shaped Connedon . All plates are 3/44n. Weld horizontal length Weld vertical length (cosetvative) Vh:=M dV Shear force in weld (V.693Ibflin' allowable shear stress. The web plate is welded to the side plates by a 5/84.in f & :=- M.1) c :=3.C :=JW f .. 2 - Dos No. thick. MF-32LIB Rwlsion: e Paw No. Loation: -Rw!J!J Mo-733 cs:m* RevIsd : * z.693Ibf/in2allowable shear stress.in Vertical distance from point "a" to neutral axis Horizontal distance from point "a" to neutral axis M = 576. Ibf in2 :=JfSh2+ (f.- f Ibf ~ in2 Shear stress on weld is less than the 6. long (see sketch below). long. Subjct:0 m . Ibf = 2028 *- Vertical torsional shear stress in f v l :=- 2 V Awl Vertical shear stress f v l -115'f.=9.+fVI)2 = 5886. M.=VJ Fillet weld size Ibf f h b x = 591 2 'in2 Shear stress in weld i less than 6.lbf (Section 5. WOlJob No. The length of each side is 12-in. NlWGD IW Jib C w d a G t t l Lab inaton 1 o /A 0f l#lwu50 -733. s 10 .33. Assume the length of the welds on each internal side is 1OS-in.LA% w: h cY' .o. EVALUATION ANALYSIS Client: . fillet weld.Numatec Hanford Cow.C JW lbf f & =5482*- Horizontaltorsional shear stress in* f.000 in.
q :=0. Any sizm larger than those proposed are acceptable (provided that the weight of the beam does not exceed 70 Ibfm) and will provide larger margins of safely beyond the factor of 5 on ultimate strength. L ! $- 7AeL w. The exktlng wall support brackets should be modified by welding a IR-ln.2541. t a L e 0 . t..000 Ibf and the wdght of the jib crane boom. EVALUATION ANALYSIS C .0.v*d: & u & ._ J 7 2 fw2 .5 ANALYSIS RESULTS The stress analysis results show that all proposed component sizes and dimensions (as shown In Fuures 14) are acceptable.. M F J Z O R* -No.4. thick plate on each of the top surfaceof the upper bracket and the bottom surface of the lower bracket at the pin hole region.37541.693 Ibf/ln2allowable shear stress. (to be In proportion with other plates).5. Take the plate thickness to be 3 U n . Figures 14 represent the main features and dimensions of the proposed jib crane. M Q D d E W d J - ~~:~ InBuMhu Morn.V Aw2 f vw2 = 1 173 -Ibf in Shear stress for shear load 2 . The depth of the plate should not be lees than 5.in2 Shear stress for tension load fvw2':.Numatec Hanford Cow. madmum clearance between the hinge and the inside space of the support plates (5. Final drawings need to be developed. The condusions and recommendationsare presented in Section 2. The proposed sizes of I-beams and welds are minimum requirements.Q : : 2 .hw2 +fvw2 lbf fw2=4191-in2 Shear stress kr less than 6. 7 0 7 A w 2 = 2 . L c u t b m p C27 h2R. I W Ibs No. thkk brackets can not satisfy the allowable shear and bearing stresses developed from the 2. The hinge pins need to be made of steel A325 or stronger to satisfy the required allowable stresees that are based on a factor of 5 on the ultimate strength of the materlal.in Weld size Lw2 :=4.1 above. 11 .in A.4. h2 fhw2:=.375. If the Rnal as built structure is different from the proposed design. see sketch on previous page. Area of weld Aw2 f = 4023 lbf . tab W W k b No. long to allow for the I B i n . distance).4 WELD OF HINGE PLATE The loads are the same as those in Section 5. because ii neglects the effect of the horizontal plate).F Length of vertical weld8 only (conwnrathm. and the fillet weld size to be W n .. The erdsting IR-in. 5. a revised stress analysis needs to be performedto verify the changes. 5.
DOE. 1965. W. Bruhn. Section 12. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No." Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 1989. Illinois.." American Society of Testing and Materials. McGrow-Hill Book Company." Design and Construction of Lifting Beams. New York. Chicago. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation. p. E. Inc. 12 th." 4 th. edib'on.vhkn: _e 5. 149-158." Journal of American Institute of Steel Construction." Fiih Edtion. E. J." Design of Welded Structures.." The James F. F. 1993. Richland. Cincinnati. R." Mechanical Engineering Design. 1983. J. Ohio. 0. Edtion." Formulas for Stress and Strain.Numatec Hanford Corp. New York.5 REFERENCES AISC. Allowable Stress Design. 1997." Manual of Steel Construction." Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manual. 9 th. Blodgett. 12 .. ASTM. 1982.." American InstiMe of Steel Construction. Ricker. Cleveland.. New York. Washington. Roark. Ohio." Philadelphia. Fourth Quarter.. McGrow-Hill Company. New York." Analysis and Design of Fliiht Vehicle Structures." ThState Offset Company.0. Shigley. 1975. Pennsylvania. Printing. David t. NF-3286 u." DOE-RL-92-36. 1991.
. zr-7 ~ ~ ~ I+ ... . .~ . 13 . .. Washinaton . .. . .. ~ . __ . .~ .. . . .. .. .. ~ .. . WON& No. .IX . .. . . -&WGD ma: Chclud: R& m .. .-LA~ Bv: Figure 1: Configurationof the Proposed 2. .. . .Numatec Hanford Cop. . .No. -.4 . JiNF-3286 RNIrlon: 9 13 d / L suyrt: P Loation: Hanford....I-:.. . . I SEE FIGURES 2-. /r . . . .000 Ibf Jib Crane.. .q_ .. .I 0 4 I f --I= $ I .. ! . . . . EVALUATION ANALYSIS CI*nt Doc No. . .- Pap.
. . ..--I . . Washindon Location: E - D x No. . . .. . . . . .. .:::I :. . . .. .. (EXjST5). Manin Hanfod. 14 . . ...LL Figure 2: Modified Bracket Configuration. . . .. .. > .~. . ~ .I I i ...-. ... i_ .. J jWGD j Date: loll I BV: H. . . . . . ... . . . . .. ... . . . .. HNF-3286 Re4rion: -0 . .~ ... -No. A rea Hanford. . ~.. ... . . .. .\ : . . ~~ . . . . J.. .. . . . . :I .-_ . . . .. ... .. . . ~ .. . .. ~.. . .. . . .. . . . ..:. . . ... . : ... Subjw.. . . . . . ' 1 . . H .. . . Dssion Anabis d 2. . . . . ... . . . -1 .. . . . . -. . . .. . . . . . . . > .. Z W ~ f f w Chakea? By: L. . .. -" ... . .. . . . .033 Ibl Jib Cnne in Chemical Lab Client in Bulldim EVALUATIONANALYSIS MO-733. . . .. -1 . . . . ~.: . . . . .. ~... . . . . 14 o /L f WWJob No. . . .Nurnatec Hanford Corp.. . .i : ~_' ~ . . . .. J u M Revid - w e H... -1 ~ . . .. .. .2. . . . . . . ... . . Gorp. . .
*irion: Figure 3: Proprties of Weld Connecting Boom (I-Beam) to Box. EVALLJATlONANALYSIS Doc NO.HNF-32e4 R.Numatec Hanford Cop. 1.x I YY .
. .. .. 16 . .. . . .. . . . EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No... .. .. .I_ . 12%40 . . . . . _.. . . ... . 3v '8 . HNF-3288 R d m : Figure 4: Configuration of Hinge and Box. . ... .. . . . .. . . . i ... .Numatec Hanford Corp. . 3/y -.. . . . . .- . . . .. . . . . .. . ._ .... . . ~ .. . . . . . 4 .. . . . .. . ...-. . W . .. . -. .. . . ... .. 12 . .
J. Peoples 5 . Crane for Chemical Laboratory Page 1 of 1 Date August 25. Koch I 57-54 57-20 R1-56 R1-56 I x X I C. R. Schlosser M. R. € Rifaey I . C. W. Zuroff I I I I I I I I Numatec Hanford CorDoration I A-6000-1 35 (10/97) . 625110 1 ECN NO. G. Tipps 57-34 ( w . Text Only Attach” Appendix Onlv EDT/ECN Only Name Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation J. N/A With All Text Attach. L. 1999 EDT No. M. Jaka MSlN 57-24 57-24 R1-56 X X X I I I X X X L . Julyk I M .000 lb. J. Elsen 0.DISTRIBUTION SHEET To Distribution Project TitleMlork Order IDesign Analysis of 2.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.