## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Objectives - To demonstrate the use of the Instron servohydraulic testing machine for testing specimens subjected to cyclic (fatigue) loadings. - To analytically approximate the fatigue damage accumulated in a part which is subjected to a known fatigue spectrum. Introduction A perusal of the broken parts in almost any scrap yard will reveal that the majority of failures occur at stresses below the yield strength. This is a result of the phenomenon called fatigue which has been estimated to be responsible for up to 90% of the in-service part failures which occur in industry. If a bar of steel is repeatedly loaded and unloaded at say 85% of its’ yield strength, it will ultimately fail in fatigue if it is loaded through enough cycles. Also, even though steel ordinarily elongates approximately 30% in a typical tensile test, almost no elongation is evident in the appearance of fatigue fractures. Basic fatigue testing involves the preparation of carefully polished test specimens (surface flaws are stress concentrators) which are cycled to failure at various values of constant amplitude alternating stress levels. The data are condensed into an alternating Stress, S, verses Number of cycles to failure, N, curve which is generally referred to as a material’s S-N curve. As one would expect, the curves clearly show that a low number of cycles are needed to cause fatigue failures at high stress levels while low stress levels can result in sudden, unexpected failures after a large number of cycles.

Background Definition: Fatigue is the condition whereby a material cracks or fails as a result of repeated (cyclic) stresses applied below the ultimate strength of the material. Fatigue failures generally involve three stages: 1.) Crack Initiation, 2.) Crack Propagation, and 3.) Fast Fracture Fatigue failures often occur quite suddenly with catastrophic (disastrous) results and although most insidious for metals, polymers and ceramics (except for glasses) are also susceptible to sudden fatigue failures. Fatigue causes brittlelike failures even in normally ductile materials with little gross plastic deformation occurring prior to fracture. The process occurs by the initiation and propagation of cracks and, ordinarily, the fracture surface is close to perpendicular to the direction of maximum tensile stress. Applied stresses may be axial (tension-compression), flexural (bending) or torsional (twisting) in nature. In general there are three possible fluctuating stress-time modes possible. The simplest is completely reversed constant amplitude where the alternating stress varies from a maximum tensile stress to a minimum compressive stress of equal magnitude. The second type, termed repeated constant amplitude, occurs when the maxima and minima are asymmetrical relative to the zero stress level. Lastly, the stress level may vary randomly in amplitude and frequency which is merely termed random cycling.

ME 3701, Materials of Engineering Laboratory, LSU

1

Cycles required to initiate a crack. Since Rapid Fracture occurs quickly. etc.) Rapid Fracture . Since most common materials contain flaws. (S-Nf) Curve 2 ME 3701. 2. Generally controlled by stress level.Cyclic Stresses Figure 1 Schematic Illustrating Cyclic Loading Parameters [Fuch & Stephens. Generally results from dislocation pile-ups and/or imperfections such as surface scratches. 1980]. the prediction of crack growth is the most studied aspect of fatigue. there is no Rapid Fracture term in the Fatigue Life expression.) Crack Initiation (Ni) . 3.Very rapid critical crack growth occurs when the crack length reaches a critical value.Cycles required to grow the crack in a stable manner to a critical size. voids. The Fatigue Life (Nf) of a component is defined by the total number of stress cycles required to cause failure.) Crack Growth (Np) . Materials of Engineering Laboratory. ac. LSU .σmin σa = Stress Range Stress Amplitude (σa): s max − s min 2 Stress Ratio (R): R= smin smax Tensile stresses are normally considered positive and compressive stresses are considered negative. Fatigue Life can be separated into three stages where Nf = Ni + Np 1. The following parameters are utilized to identify fluctuating stress cycles: Mean Stress (σm): (σr): smax + smin σm = 2 σr = σmax .

several ASTM standards address stress-based fatigue testing. ME 3701. Fatigue Testing Materials Testing to obtain S-Nf Curves is common. 1990].Most Fatigue Tests are conducted at what is referred to as “Constant Amplitude” which merely refers to the fact that the maximum and minimum stresses are constant for each cycle of a test. Figure 3 Rotating Bending Testing Machine [Callister. A prediction of failure for various stress levels can be made by studying a material’s S-Nf curve. Each point on the Surface of the Rotating Bend Specimen is subjected to fully-reversed cycling (σm = 0) and the tests are generally Constant Amplitude. Fatigue tests tend to be time consuming and expensive. The Endurance Limit defines the stress level below which the material will theoretically withstand an infinite number (~108) of stress cycles without fracture. The mos important part of the curve is often the portion to the right of the bend (or “knee”) in the curve that identifies what is termed the Endurance Limit or the Fatigue Limit. S-Nf Curves are generally plotted on semi-log or log-log paper where each dot represents the results of a single test specimen. LSU 3 . 1994]. The "Rotating Bending Testing Machine" is similar to the original railroad axle-type Wohler used where the bending moment is constant along the beam length. S-Nf refers to a plot of Constant Amplitude Stress Level (S) verses Number of Cycles to Failure (Nf). Materials of Engineering Laboratory. Figure 2 Stress Amplitude versus Number of Cycles to Failure Curves [Flinn & Trojan. each data point represents many hours of testing.

None-the-less. Materials of Engineering Laboratory. 1981]. the newest Instron Machine at LSU-ME is of this type.Reciprocating Bending Testing Machine [Collins. Figure 5."Reciprocating Bending Testing Machines" utilize a rotating crank to achieve a non-zero mean stress through positioning of the specimen with respect to the motor as shown in Figure 4. LSU 4 . Similar to the Reciprocating Bending set-up. Figure 4. the "Direct Force Fatigue Testing Machines" apply axial loads as is illustrated in Figure 5. ME 3701. computer controlled "Servohydraulic Systems" are the most common in operation today. 1981]. Computerized Servohydraulics are capable of both Monitoring and Controlling a desired cyclic pattern in any of the following: Load-Time Strain-Time Displacement-Time This level of control allows the operator to program real-time fatigue spectrums including underloads and overloads.Direct-Force Fatigue Testing Machine [Collins.

Figure 6 Fatigue Test Specimens: (a) Rotating Bending.(i) Compact tension and (j) three point bend specimen [Fuch & Stephens. Common test specimen types for obtaining fatigue data are shown in Figure 6. . ME 3701. (h) part-through crack. (d) threaded axial dog-bone. (b) Cantilever Flat Sheet (cont."Component Testing" and/or "Full-Scale Prototype Tests" are still carried out on Fatigue-Critical structures. 1980].Strength distribution at a constant life. Materials of Engineering Laboratory. (f) combined stress.) Figure 6 Fatigue Test Specimens: (c) buttoned axial dog-bone. Most fatigue testing is conducted at the basic material level. (g) axial cracked sheet. LSU 5 .Life distribution at a constant stress level. differences between laboratory and service conditions must be considered by mechanical designers. (e) torsion. Fatigue Testing Procedures A number of fatigue testing procedures have been developed to satisfy specific objectives: .

A low number of tests (1 to 3) are conducted at a set of stress amplitudes that span the expected stress range of the material. The "Standard Method" of fatigue testing is the most common and is utilized when only a few test specimens are available. and the most often utilized.. Run-Outs (specimens which do not fail after 10 8 cycles) are noted (o−−>. The most basic cumulative damage approach. the damage (D) caused by one cycle is merely defined as D = 1 Nf ME 3701. 1980]. Note that Probability Estimates for this method would be unreliable due to the scarcity of data" Figure 7 Standard Method S-Nf Curves [Fuch & Stephens. Materials of Engineering Laboratory. Under this approach. see Figure 7) and rerun at a higher stress level to maximize the data obtained from the limited specimen set. 1980] Analysis Method Realize that most fatigue is NOT actually constant amplitude. is referred to as Miner’s Law which is based on the man who developed the approach. This area of fatigue is referred to as “Cumulative Damage”. Figure 8 Sample Actual Fatigue Spectrums [Fuch & Stephens. Two S-Nf Curves are generally constructed: (1) an "Eyeballed Mean Curve" which passes near the mean of each tested stress amplitude. σa and Nf are recorded for each specimen. but methods have been developed for utilizing constant amplitude S-Nf results to predict failure under varying load histories. The specific procedure followed should be carefully chosen based on the data requirements. and (2) an "Eyeballed Conservative Curve" which is slightly below all of the data points.Design data at a minimal cost and time. LSU 6 . etc.

document the testing parameters used (waveform.174 Cycles at 15 ksi ME 3701. frequency. 2. amplitude and frequency can be easily varied in Position Control (similar flexibility can be achieved in Load Control) without any specimen mounted on the machine. Smax. Present the test parameters (waveform. 2. Sa. Comment on the results of the test. maximum & minimum load. Problem (Miner's Law): The S-Nf curve shown on the next page is for a low-carbon steel.see Lab Requirements Lab Requirements This is an In-Class Lab. If an automobile strut made of this steel is subjected to the stress spectrum listed below over a 4 month period: a. D. What’s the expected life for the part? 1 Cycle at 55 ksi 35 Cycles at 45 ksi 147 Cycles at 35 ksi 21. f) and test results (Nf) for the fatigue sample tested. all student work must be submitted prior to leaving the lab session. and a fatigue failure prediction problem applying Miner’s Law. Sr.920. Sm. Materials of Engineering Laboratory.The damage produced by "n" cycles at a given stress level is given by D = n Nf Thus the cumulative damage for a set of cycles over a range of stress levels can be expressed as D = ∑ Di = ∑ n i N fi where ni represents the number of cycles at stress level “i” and Nfi represents the number of cycles that will cause failure at stress level “i”. tension-tension fatigue test on a 3.271 Cycles at 25 ksi 1. Procedure This lab consists of an in-class demonstration of using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron) to conduct fatigue tests. dogbone sample up to fracture. Fatigue Demonstration: The lab TA will demonstrate the versatility of the Instron Machine for conducting fatigue tests by showing how waveform. Measure the sample prior to testing and record its’ dimensions. Smin. a single test on a dog-bone specimen. How much damage will the part accumulate in 2 years based on Miner’s Law? b. etc. 1. Fatigue Test: The lab TA will conduct a constant amplitude. 1. Miner's Law Problem . R.). LSU 7 .

Materials of Engineering Laboratory.ME 3701. LSU 8 .

- Fatigue Test
- Fatigue Test
- Tensile Fatigue Test Procedure
- Expt 05 Fatigue Test
- Fatigue Tes
- fatigue test
- lab05-FatigueTest.pdf
- Exp-7 Fatigue Test
- Fatigue Testing
- Fatigue Test
- Chapter 4 Stress Strain - S10
- 05224G_Chapter14 (1)
- 8.Fatigue Test
- Fatigue Test
- Fatigue Test
- Torsion Test
- Filter Press 1
- Fatigue ANalysis SN Curve
- fatigue
- Expt 06 Creep Test
- Fatigue Testing
- 000194
- JIGS AND FIXTURES
- Torsion Test
- Fatigue Testing
- Fatigue test design
- Couplings
- (Plate and Filter Frame Press)
- Hardnes Testing
- Fatigue Test.pdf

Skip carousel

- Fatigue or Durability Analysis of Steering Knuckle
- tmpA713.tmp
- Fatigue Durability Analysis for Welded Bogie Frame
- As NZS 3696.8-1998 Wheelchairs Requirements and Test Methods for Static Impact and Fatigue Strengths
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Armco Steel Corporation and Pullman Incorporated, Pullman Incorporated, Third-Party v. Maryland Casualty Company, Third-Party, 490 F.2d 367, 3rd Cir. (1974)
- HB 48-1999 Steel Structures Design Handbook
- Tmp 5486
- An Implication of Fatigue Concept on Design of Cement Concrete Pavement and Its Critical Comparison with Other Methods
- Army Aviation Digest - Feb 1986
- A Review on
- As NZS 1554.5-2011 Structural Steel Welding Welding of Steel Structures Subject to High Levels of Fatigue Loa
- An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis & Modification of a Shock Absorber of a Bajaj 150 CC
- As NZS 1554.1-2011 Structural Steel Welding Welding of Steel Structures
- Failure Analysis of Suspension System
- tmp40E1
- Modeling and Analysis of Telescopic Hydraulic Cylinder for Increase Load Capacity
- A Review of an Experimental and Theoretical Analysis & Modification of Bajaj Discover 150cc
- Steve Conn Statement to DFT
- Thermal & structural analysis in Welded pipe flange Joints with help of FEA
- tmp3BC1
- Design and Linear Static Analysis of Transport Aircraft Vertical Tail for Different Rudder Deflection (Rotation)
- Sabo Bridge report
- Vintage Airplane - Apr 2001
- Review Paper on Shot Peening Process
- A Review on Welding Failure in Fly Ash Brick Machine
- Review of Compression Helical Spring for Two Wheeler Suspension Systems
- A Review on Skirt to Dished end Joint of Pressure Vessel
- tmp96B2
- Design, Analysis & Optimization of Pivot of Rocker Arm
- UT Dallas Syllabus for mech7v80.501.11s taught by Harun Khan (hrk102020)

Skip carousel

- As 2205.7.1-2003 Methods for Destructive Testing of Welds in Metal - Charpy v-Notch Impact Fracture Toughness
- Tmp 4137
- tmp8086.tmp
- A Review of Analysis of Concrete Beam by Fracture Mechanics Approach
- tmp3D36.tmp
- tmp1BEE
- As 2205.7.3-2003 Methods for Destructive Testing of Welds in Metal - Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests (K(Su
- tmp5D96
- Apollo Experience Report the Problem of Stress-Corrosion Cracking
- To Study the Behaviour of High Strength Concrete Beam Reinforced with Hybrid Fibre Subjected to Cyclic Loading
- tmp2938.tmp
- tmpA858
- tmp6F8
- tmp6D5C
- tmpCE5A.tmp
- Tmp 9969
- tmpF05D.tmp
- tmpFF98
- Study of fracture in concrete using fractals
- tmp943B
- tmpBB34
- Tmp 6663
- tmpCF9A.tmp
- tmp62A4.tmp
- tmp8830.tmp
- tmpEAC4.tmp
- tmp54A3
- tmpA1E
- tmp40E1
- tmpC033

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Handout 6 will be available on

Loading