BIOMASS PROGRAM

National Algal Biofuels
Technology Roadmap

MAY 2010

National Algal Biofuels
Technology Roadmap
A technology roadmap resulting from the National Algal Biofuels Workshop
December 9-10, 2008
College Park, Maryland

Workshop and Roadmap sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Office of the Biomass Program
Publication Date: May 2010

John Ferrell Valerie Sarisky-Reed
Office of Energy Efficiency Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy and Renewable Energy
Office of the Biomass Program Office of the Biomass Program
(202)586-5340 (202)586-5340
john.ferrell@ee.doe.gov valerie.sarisky-reed@ee.doe.gov

Roadmap Editors:
Daniel Fishman, Rajita Majumdar,1 Joanne Morello,2 Ron Pate,3 and Joyce Yang2
1

Workshop Organizers:
Al Darzins, Grant Heffelfinger, Ron Pate, Leslie Pezzullo,2 Phil Pienkos,4 Kathy Roach,5 Valerie Sarisky-Reed,2 and the
4 3 3

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE)

A complete list of workshop participants and roadmap contributors is available in the appendix.

Suggested Citation for This Roadmap:
U.S. DOE 2010. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Biomass Program.
Visit http://biomass.energy.gov for more information

BCS, Incorporated 2Office of the Biomass Program 3Sandia National Laboratories
1

4
National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5MurphyTate LLC

106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of energy. this report could be “influential scientific information” as that term is defined in the Office of Management and Budget’s Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin). the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law No. .2 of the Bulletin. As such. This report has been peer reviewed pursuant to section II. Further.This report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy.

this document represents the synthesis of the Biomass Program’s National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap Workshop. but their significant potential to serve as renewable transportation fuels warrants our thorough consideration of what efforts are necessary to make them a commercial-scale reality. and supporting scientific literature. DOE is investing in a variety of research. DOE looks forward to continuing its work with diverse partners in evaluating renewable energy options and facilitating development of those that carry the greatest benefits today and in the years to come. Biomass Program U. it remains committed to fostering technologies that could yield substantial benefits over time. reliable energy. and other stakeholders. research managers. This Roadmap lays the groundwork for identifying challenges that will likely need to be surmounted for algae and cyanobacteria to be used in the production of economically viable. Department of Energy (DOE) Biomass Program’s National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. while DOE works to deploy renewable energy and energy-efficient projects across the country today. Prepared with the input of more than 200 scientists. and demonstration (RD&D) projects that seek to tackle key technical hurdles associated with commercializing algal biofuels. Through appropriated dollars and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. engineers. These national challenges require near-term solutions as well as investments in nascent technologies that show promise for the future. This Roadmap is intended to summarize the state of technology for algae-based fuels and document the research and development challenges associated with producing them at a commercial scale. engineers.Preface Welcome to the U. as well as the recognition that we will not likely achieve these goals via one technology pathway. industry representatives. DOE has recently revived its investment in algal biofuels in response to the increased urgency of lowering greenhouse gas emissions and producing affordable. sustainable algal biofuels will entail years of research and careful planning. development.S. Meanwhile. comments gathered during a public comment period. and we hope it fosters and informs participation from existing and new stakeholders as the next steps are taken to advance algal biofuels. and decision-makers by providing a summary of progress to date and a direction for future algae RD&D activities.S. and the stability of our global climate. environmentally sound biofuels. Renewable energy lies at the intersection of some of our nation’s most pressing issues: our energy security. Therefore. Achieving cost-competitive. and the academic community are also increasing their efforts to optimize and commercialize this renewable energy source. other federal agencies. It is intended to serve as a resource for researchers. our economic wellbeing. private companies. Department of Energy Preface  i . Valerie Sarisky-Reed Acting Manager.

S. 5) production of both biofuels and valuable Energy Steven Chu announced the investment of $800M co-products. meet the new RFS feedstock resources. biomass-derived fuels have received increasing attention as one solution to our nation’s continued and growing dependence on imported oil. and impacts A culture of the microalgae Botryococcus. 2008. announcing $800 million in new biofuel research activities I n recent years. ii Executive Summary  . the end of the program. biofuels derived from algae 1) high per-acre productivity. produced. including advanced and products can be generated using algae precursors. and Renewal Act. Of these candidates. while at the same time moving the nation ever closer to non-arable land. a scalable.S. The term algae can refer to microalgae. a number of next generation have combined to capture the interest of researchers and biofuels show significant promise in helping to achieve entrepreneurs around the world. These include: the goal. was convened fuels. and advanced biofuels. brackish. Under certain conditions. 2009. provide environmental benefits. held December 9-10. President Obama and Secretary of wastewater). In addition fuel sold in the U. cyanobacteria (the so called “blue-green algae”). Much has changed since deployment of commercial algae-to-biofuel processes. dependence on foreign research both in EERE and other government agencies oil. While cellulosic ethanol is expected to play a large role There are several aspects of algal biofuel production that in meeting the EISA goals. weight). some microalgae and renewable source of biomass feedstock for biofuels have the potential to accumulate significant amounts has been explored previously. and macroalgae (or While the basic concept of using algae as an alternative seaweed). to contain a minimum of 36 billion to fungible biofuels. Photo courtesy of the our national security. The Energy Independence and Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton Security Act of 2007 (EISA) established a mandatory (CCMP). cellulosic biofuels and biomass-based diesel. including starches and brought together more than 200 scientists. 4) utilization of a wide variety of water energy independence. illustrated the potential Program to invest in the research. 2) non-food based have the potential to help the U. opportunities across the nation have renewed interest in developing algal feedstocks for biofuels production. Rising petroleum prices and a Additional funding is being directed to algae-to-biofuel national mandate to reduce U. and 6) potential recycling of CO2 and other in new research on biofuels in the American Recovery nutrient waste streams. and create economic and programs. To accelerate the deployment of sources (fresh. by 2022. These characteristics give great potential for The National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap an immediate pathway to high energy density. saline. and of algae as a biofuel feedstock. a variety of different biofuels and gallons of renewable fuels. 3) use of otherwise non-productive. marine. which exposes the country to the risk of critical disruptions in fuel supply. development. an effort Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s (EERE) Biomass undertaken from 1978 to 1996. The two-day event feedstocks and intermediates.Executive Summary “ ” Developing the next generation of biofuels is key to our effort to end our dependence on foreign oil and address the climate crisis – while creating millions of new jobs that can’t be outsourced — Secretary of Energy Steven Chu at the White House ceremony on May 5. creates economic and social uncertainties for businesses and individuals. fungible Workshop. engineers. sustainable of lipids (more than 50% of their ash-free cell dry and commercially viable system has yet to emerge. This announcement included funds for the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy The DOE-supported Aquatic Species Program.S. These fuels can also be produced using other algae by DOE-EERE’s Biomass Program. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring transportation sugars from cyanobacteria and macroalgae.

research managers. and the private sector in implementing national This document represents the output from the Workshop. This document also seeks to explore technologies in an integrated process will be a key the economic and environmental impacts of deploying component to accelerating progress. The Roadmap In summary. policymakers. By documenting the challenges across the algal discuss and identify the critical challenges currently biomass supply chain and highlighting research and hindering the economical production of algal biofuels at coordination needs and gaps. development. guide researchers and engineers. and regulators from across the country to scale. and deployment efforts. federal agencies. and comments received during a public comment period. The ability techno-economic challenges associated with scaling to quickly test and implement new and innovative up of processes. Executive Summary  iii . supporting scientific literature. the Roadmap Workshop effort suggests document is intended to provide a comprehensive state that many years of both basic and applied science and of technology summary for fuels and co-products from engineering will likely be needed to achieve affordable. industry representatives. lawyers. and sustainable algal-based fuels. algal feedstocks and to document the feasibility and scalable. research. this document will serve to commercial scale. algal biomass production systems at commercial financiers.

and cyanobacteria (formerly called “blue-green algae”). such as sugars. Designing an optimum cultivation system involves leveraging the biology of the algal strain used and inegrating it with the best suited downstream processing options. and taking advantage of the biology of algal strains selected for use in production systems is the foundation for processing feedstocks into fuels and products. Algae occur in a variety of natural aqueous and terrestial habitats ranging from freshwater. scalability. to generate new biomass). Isolating new strains directly from unique environments will ensure versatile and robust strains for mass culture needed in biofuels applications. Macroalgae (or seaweed) has different cultivation needs that typically require open off-shore or coastal facilities. and sustainability of algae to biofuel systems. brackish waters. Open Ponds Example Cultivation Systems POLICY SITING AND RESOURCES iv Executive Summary  Development Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis: Guiding Path Toward the Research and a . marine.FROM ALGAE FROM TO TO ALGAE BIOFUELS BIOFUELS An Integrated Systems An Integrated Approach Systems to Renewable Approach Energy to Renewable that is E nergy ALGAE FEEDSTOCKS CULTIVATION Microalgae and cyanobacteria can be cultivated via photoautotrophic methods (where algae require light to grow and create new biomass) in open or closed ponds or via heterotrophic methods (where algae are grown without light and are fed a carbon source. Fermentation Tanks MICROALGAE CYANOBACTERIA MACROALGAE Algae as feedstocks for bioenergy refers to a diverse group of Closed Photobioreactors organisms that include microalgae. macroalgae (seaweed). Choices made for the cultivation system are key to the affordability. and hyper-saline environments to soil and in symbiotic associations with other organisms. Understanding. managing.

CH-O-C R2 O CH2-O-C R3 Bio-Crude Algal Lipid: Precursor to Biofuels Three major components can be extracted from algal biomass: lipids (including triglycerides and fatty acids). fertilizers. animal feed. Abundant. and proteins. Affordable.. Some algal biomass production processes are investigating options to bypass extraction. These steps can be energy-intensive and can entail siting Conversion technology options include chemical. and surfactants) REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS Executive Summary  v Commercially Viable Algal Biofuel Industry . optimizing extraction systems that consume less energy than contained in the algal products is a challenge due to the high energy needs associated with both handling and drying algal biomass as well as separating out desirable products. biodiesel and jet fuel). Algal cultures are mainly grown 1) Conversion of whole algal biomass.. While many analytical techniques exist. gasoline.g. industrial enzymes. Most challenges in extraction are associated with the industrial scale up of integrated extraction systems.. End Uses: • Biodiesel • Biogas • Renewable Hydrocarbons • Co-products • Alcohols (e. proteins can be used for co-products (e. or a 2-O-C EXTRACTION combination of these approaches. carbohydrates. or harvested algal biomass prior to extraction and conversion. biochemical. 3) Processing of direct algal secretions. bioplastics. issues.g. animal/fish feeds). and Sustainable HARVESTING / DEWATERING CONVERSION Some processes for the conversion of algae to liquid Conversion to fuels and products is predicated on a basic transportation fuels require pre-processing steps such as process decision point: harvesting and dewatering. Focusing on biofuels as the end-product O poses challenges due to the high volumes and relative low CH2-O-C R1 values associated with bulk commodities like gasoline and O diesel fuels. though these are also subject to a number of unique scale-up challenges. in water and can require process steps to concentrate 2) Extraction of algal metabolites. and thermochemical processes.g. While lipids and carbohydrates are fuel precursors (e. The end products vary depending on the conversion technology utilized.

vi Executive Summary  .

................ .........................................................2 A History of Domestic Algal Biofuels Development.................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Research from 1996 to Present................................................2 Scale-Up Challenges..............3 Algal Biotechnology...................................7 2............................1 Cultivation Pathways............................................................1 Strain Isolation.................................................................................................................3 Early Work to 1996......................................................................................................................................................................1 About the Roadmap...............20 Considerations of Genetic Modifications............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Lipid Synthesis and Regulation................................................................................................................................................. 29 Microalgae and Cyanobacteria.........5 Technology and Analysis Challenges.........5 1............................................11 Algal Carbohydrates.....................................2 Algal Physiology and Biochemistry......................................................3 1................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Overview................... 29 Macroalgae..................................................................................................................7 References............................................................................................................... 23 3..................................... Screening and Selection ......................... 19 Applications of Biotechnology to Algal Bioenergy............................................................................................................. Algal Biology.................................................................................................................................... 16 The Genetic Toolbox............................. Algal Cultivation............................ 15 2.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Contents  vii .......................................................................................................8 Isolation and Characterization of Naturally Occurring Algae .....................8 2.................11 Carbon Partitioning and Metabolism.................................................7 Public-Private Partnerships............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Contents 1......................................................................... 22 References.......................................................................................10 2.............................1 1............................9 Selecting Algal Model Systems for Study.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Enabling Technologies: “Omics” Approaches and Bioinformatics......................8 Role of Culture Collections as National Algae Data Resource Centers.............................. 12 Biohydrogen .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 America’s Energy Challenges....30 3..........................29 3..................................................................................1 Advantages of Algal Feedstocks..................... 11 Photosynthesis and Light Utilization........ 31 Stability of Large-Scale Cultures ...........3 Algae-to-Biofuels: Opportunity and Challenges Today.................5 Regulations and Standards........

................. .................................................................................. ........................................................................... Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering............................................... Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies ............................................... 45 5................50 Gasification. 38 Harvesting....................................................................... 35 4........................................................... and Management.............................................................................................. 32 Nutrient Sources.............................................................. 49 Hydrogen................................................................................................... Cell Rupture)...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Mechanical Disruption (i.48 Alcohols.......................42 5...................................................................... 37 4..................................................... 45 Heterotrophic Production............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Current Practices for Lipid Extraction.......3 Systems Engineering .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 Anaerobic Digestion of Whole Algae................................................................. 39 References......... 53 6.................................1 Direct Production of Biofuels from Algae................................................................................................................................................................................................40 Preliminary Look at Energy Balance ......................................................................................................... 51 Liquefaction.......................................................3 Conversion of Algal Extracts...........37 Harvesting.........................................................................................................................................................40 5.........................................2 Challenges.............................46 References.. Sustainability........................................................................................................................... Extraction of Products from Algae ....... 38 4..................................................................................................1 Approaches for Microalgae........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 Chemical Transesterification............................................................................................. 38 Preprocessing....37 Drying................................................................................................................................................ 33 References....................................................... 52 Supercritical Processing.....50 6........................................... 42 Organic Co-solvent Mixtures................................. Conservation............................................................................................................................ System Productivity...........................................................................48 6.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................44 Subcritical Water Extraction........................................... 45 Supercritical Fluid Extraction............................ and Recycling............................................. 43 Accelerated Solvent Extraction............................ 39 4............................................................................................................2 Approaches for Macroalgae ........................................................... 49 Alkanes.............44 Selective Extraction.......................e................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Water Management.................................................................................................................................................... 54 viii Contents  ............................................50 Pyrolysis....................................................................................................46 6..........................................................................................2 Processing of Whole Algae.........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...........................................3 Potential Options for the Recovery of Co-products......................77 Carbon Dioxide................... 83 Wastewater Treatment and Recycling Applications....................... 88 Directions for Research and Development..................................... 55 Catalytic Cracking......................... 58 7..................................4 Processing of Algal Remnants after Extraction.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Resources Overview.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................75 Water...57 References........ 88 References...............73 Heterotrophic Microalgae Approach.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 84 Main Research Needs for Algae Production with Wastewater ...............75 Climate .................................... 86 9............................... 81 9.....................................................................................2 Utilization.............................................................................................................................................................................. 69 8............................................................... Biochemical (Enzymatic) Conversion...........................................................................4 Integration with Water Treatment Facilities ..................................................................................... 67 8.................................................1 Resource Requirements for Different Cultivation Approaches........................................................................... 61 7............................................................ 86 The Opportunity in Co-Locating with CO2-Emitting Sources............................................................... ................................................................................................74 Photoautotrophic Macroalgae Approach.............................72 9.......................................................... 61 7...................................................................................... 73 Photoautotrophic Microalgae Approach..............74 9.....64 References.............................................................. 83 Algae Production Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Plants........... 56 6.............. 70 Algal Blendstocks for Alcohol and Gasoline-Range Petroleum Products........ and Jet Fuel ...................90 Contents  ix .................................................................5 Co-location of Algal Cultivation Facilities with CO2-Emitting Industries.................................................................. 70 Algal Blendstocks to Replace Middle-Distillate Petroleum Products........................................80 Land..................................................................................................................................................................... Co-products ..............................................................................2 Commercial Products from Macroalgae..................................................................................................................................................................................................71 References...................................................................................................................................................................................1 Commercial Products from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria..........................................................................................................1 Distribution................................................................. 55 Conversion to Renewable Diesel........... .........................64 7........... Resources and Siting ........................... Distribution and Utilization...................................................................................................69 8.................................................... 73 9.................................................................................................... Gasoline................................................................................................................................................... 87 Barriers to Co-Location of Algae Production with Stationary Industrial CO2 Sources .............................................

...... 109 11............... 93 10........................................................................................................................110 11..........................................................................................................................................10............... Public-Private Partnerships .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Components of Successful Public-Private Partnerships................................................... 109 11.....................................2 TEA Scope and Methods...... 105 11.........................................102 Life Cycle Analysis.........1 The Benefits of Algal Biofuels Public-Private Partnerships......................................110 11.......................4 Systems Analysis.............................6 Preliminary System Dynamics Modeling ........ 104 10...................................................1 Objectives of Techno-Economic Analysis ....................................115 Appendix 2: Contributors.........99 Overview....3 Suggestions for TEA and LCA Approach (Workshop Results and Discussion).........................................7 Potential Directions for R&D Effort ....................................................................................... 104 10..........................................................................................................................5 Modeling Partnerships for Technology Development..93 10..99 Engineering Analyses and GIS Assessments......................................... 111 References........................................114 Appendices .........................3 Forums for Public-Private Partnerships......................................................................................................................... 97 10.............................122 Appendix 3: Respondents to Request for Information on the Draft Roadmap.................................................. 115 Appendix 1 : Workshop Participants................................................................................................ 104 10...........................................................124 x Contents  ......................................................94 10................................................................................................................................................................................................ Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis......................................5 Algae Production Costs and Uncertainties................................................................................................................................................................... 111 11........................4 Partnership Challenges in the Algal Biofuels Industry.............................................................. 100 Impact of Geographic Variability of Inputs on Algal Biofuel Production Costs.....................................................

The Workshop was organized by the Biomass Program to rising energy demand in many rapidly developing discuss and identify the critical challenges currently countries around the world is beginning to create hindering the development of a domestic. Standard (RFS) that increase over time (Exhibit 1. including the Energy Independence and Security Act a 60-day public comment period was held to allow of 2007. the national laboratories. the Program has undertaken a diverse portfolio of research. Furthermore.S. The full proceedings of the Workshop can on oil. 1. Algal biofuels offer great promise in contributing to Every attempt was made to ensure that the Roadmap the Program’s vision. that both assesses the current state of technology and provides direction to the Program’s RD&D efforts. Workshop participants to evaluate the Roadmap for and deployment (RD&D) activities. and criticisms not captured during the Workshop. While Biofuels derived from algae can meet these l onger-term addressing the potential economic and environmental needs of the RFS and represent a significant opportunity benefits of using algal biomass for the production of to impact the U. to the development of this Algal Biofuels Technology enhances U. All comments are noted in the Appendix of this document. Department experience and expertise during a series of technical of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and break-out sessions that spanned critical aspects of the Renewable Energy is committed to advancing the vision algal biomass supply chain and cross-cutting issues. in partnership fidelity and incorporate new information. energy supply for transportation liquid transportation fuels. which set new standards for More than 200 stakeholders were convened at the vehicle fuel economy. the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) was enacted. In doing so.S. the Roadmap describes fuels.1). Overview  1 .1 America’s Energy Challenges About the Roadmap As global petroleum supplies diminish. and sustainable algal-based biofuels. at the University of Maryland-College Park. and non-governmental organizations. In 2007. approximately two-thirds of its petroleum. 1. and creates be found at http://www. of which only 15 economic. 60% of 2008. and policy perspectives that can support billion gallons can be produced from corn-based ethanol. economic opportunities across the nation. representing a diverse range of expertise from promote the use of renewable fuels. gallons of renewable fuels by 2022. viewpoints. and industry. The RFS mandates blending of 36 billion This Roadmap presents information from a scientific. academia. Despite their potential. bioproducts and biopower. the state of technology the current status of algae RD&D. reduces our dependence Roadmap. The Program’s goals are driven by various federal policies and laws. as well as helping to meet the development process was transparent and inclusive. scalable. the production of economically viable biofuels. intense competition for the world’s dwindling petroleum scale algal biofuels industry. academia. energy security. The United States currently imports Technology Roadmap Workshop. the combustion of petroleum- Workshop was to gather the necessary information based fuels has created serious concerns about climate to produce an algal biofuels technology roadmap change from the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. with national laboratories. To accomplish its goals.1. it lays for producing algal biofuels is regarded by many in the groundwork for identifying challenges that likely the field to be in its infancy and there is a considerable need to be overcome for algal biomass to be used in amount of RD&D is needed to achieve affordable. A major objective of the reserves. agencies. The The legislation establishes production requirements for Workshop provided a stimulating environment to explore domestic alternative fuels under the Renewable Fuels topics affecting the development of algal biofuels industry. as well as made provisions that Workshop.S. Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) mandate established within EISA.gov/algae2008pro/. the United The framework for National Algal Biofuels Technology States is becoming increasingly dependent upon foreign Roadmap was constructed at the Algal Biofuels sources of crude oil. of a viable. government and new energy technology research and development. development. energy efficiency. Following the release of the initial draft of the Roadmap. commercial. Overview The Workshop was able to capture the participants’ The Biomass Program (Program) of the U. sustainable domestic biomass industry that The outcomes from the Workshop provided key inputs produces renewable biofuels.orau. held December 9-10. The which is used for producing transportation fuels. industry. provides environmental benefits. and guide RD&D investment in algal biofuels.

Advanced biofuels face significant challenges in meeting the ambitious targets set by EISA.1 0. oleaginous Exhibit 1.0 billion gallons. 2005).65 0. Potential oil yields from certain algae production of biofuels and bioproducts from components strains are projected to be at least 60 times higher than of biomass.25 0.0 2019 8.0 15.1 2010 0.5 20. Cellulosic feedstocks were • Recycles stationary emissions of carbon dioxide identified by the Billion Ton Study as a significant source • Compatible with integrated production of fuels and of biomass (Perlack et al.5 0. Algal biomass may per acre of land on an annual basis (Rodolfi et al.0 26.75 18.95 2012 0.0 2018 7. Significant acreage and productivity will be required • Minimizes competition with conventional agriculture for biomass production to generate sufficient feedstock • Utilizes a wide variety of water sources to meet the RFS mandates.5 a 9.35 13.5 a 13.. b To be determined by EPA through a future rulemaking. 2 1. CELLULOSIC BIOMASS-BASED ADVANCED BIOFUEL TOTAL RENEWABLE BIOFUEL DIESEL REQUIREMENT FUEL REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT 2009 N/A 0.0 2020 10.75 16.25 a 7.0 2023 b b b b a To be determined by EPA through a future rulemaking.55 2014 1.0 24. but no less than 1.0 36. and approximately 5 times that of oil palm fuels for aviation and ground transport.0 2021 13.95 2011 0. microalgae have demonstrated potential oil yields that are significantly higher than the yields of oilseed crops Many pathways are currently under consideration for (Exhibit 1. For example.95 12. while algae may co-products within biorefineries offer comparable biomass productivity as lignocellulosic feedstocks – the key biomass resource factored in the study.0 a 21..0 30.80 1.5 a 15.2). the study did not explore the potential of algae.0 33.6 11.0 2.5 a 18. 2009). Overview  .0 2022 16.15 2015 3.0 a 2. approximately 15 times more productive to advanced biofuels such as high energy density fungible than jatropha.0 a 5.2 2013 1. offer significant advantages that complement traditional feedstocks towards these fuels.0 a 11.5 2016 4.25 22.0 28. As required by EISA. The most promising among these are routes from soybeans. However.1 Renewable Fuel Standard volume requirements (billion gallons) Cellulosic biofuels and biomass-based diesel are included in the advanced biofuel requirement.25 2017 5.5 1.75 a 3. advanced biofuels must demonstrate GHG emissions UNIQUE ADVANTAGES OF ALGAL FEEDSTOCK FOR across their life cycle that are at least 50% less than GHG ADVANCED BIOFUELS emissions produced by petroleum-based transportation • High area productivity fuels.

000 strains of microalgae over a seven-year period from various sites in the western. a comprehensive overview Algae 1. formerly the Solar Energy Research Institute).2 Comparison of oil yields from biomass feedstocksa Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL. During the early years. A detailed engineering analysis by Benemann et al. • Algal biomass is compatible with the integrated biorefinery vision of producing a variety of fuels and The Aquatic Species Program represents one of the most valuable co-products. Some of the highlights are described briefly below. 1998) was invested during the 18-year Soybean 48 program. northwestern.500b of the project was completed (Sheehan et al. earlier studies have laid foundational to produce neutral lipids. The collection was narrowed approaches to the technologies being explored today. this report The Aquatic Species Program researchers collected more than 3. could lead to this phenomenon. a Adapted from Chisti (2007) b Estimated yields. and also for their ability not yet emerged. Approximately $25 million (Sheehan. comprehensive research efforts to date on fuels from microalgae. The program lasted from 1978 until 1996 and supported research primarily at DOE’s National Exhibit 1. to the 300 most promising strains. 1. but the focus changed to Camelina 62 liquid fuels (biodiesel) in the early 1980s. have been apparent since the mid-twentieth century. Sunflower 102 studies of algal physiology and biochemistry. Advances were made through algal strain isolation and characterization. dates back to the 1940s. process development. representing a diversity of aquatic Algal Biofuels Development environments and water types. inland saline habitats that typically The advantages of algae as a feedstock for bioenergy undergo substantial swings in temperature and salinity. and temperature. genetic Jatropha 202 engineering. however. pH.Advantages of Algal Feedstocks Early Work to 1996 Algae can be preferred feedstock for high energy density. There are several started in the late 1950s when Meier (1955) and Oswald aspects of algal biofuel production that have combined to and Golueke (1960) suggested the utilization of the capture the interest of researchers and entrepreneurs around carbohydrate fraction of algal cells for the production of the world: methane gas via anaerobic digestion. produced water. including power plants and the oil embargo of the early 1970s and the energy price other industrial emitters. and demonstration- scale algal mass culture. gained serious attention only during from stationary sources. 1. surges through the decade.000-6. 1998). Techno-economic analyses Oil palm 635 and resource assessments were also important aspects of the program. commercially viable system has in salinity. The concept of utilizing the lipid stores as a source of • Algae can recycle carbon from CO2-rich flue emissions energy. thereby reducing competition for limited as nitrogen or silicon. Proposals to use algae as a means of producing energy fungible liquid transportation fuels. primarily green algae (Chlorophyceae) and diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). such saline water. Overview  3 . Many of the strains were isolated from shallow.2 A History of Domestic and southeastern U. with projected costs for fossil fuels. In 1998. Various reports during the 1950s • Algae can utilize waste water. (1978) indicated that algal • Algal productivity can offer high biomass yields per systems could produce methane gas at prices competitive acre of cultivation.S. and and 1960s indicated that starvation for key nutrients.. a scalable. The isolates were screened for their tolerance to variations Although. The Aquatic Species OIL YIELD Program also funded research at many academic CROP (GALLONS/ACRE/YR) institutions through subcontracts. freshwater supplies. this idea ultimately became a major push of DOE’s Aquatic Species Program. the emphasis was on using algae to produce hydrogen. The discovery that • Algae cultivation strategies can minimize or avoid many species of microalgae can produce large amounts of competition with arable land and nutrients used for lipid as cellular oil droplets under certain growth conditions conventional agriculture.

biological productivity was shown to have commercialization of the technology..or methyl-esters (biodiesel) was overall rate of oil production in a culture (because of the successfully demonstrated in the Aquatic Species concomitant decrease in the cell growth rate). Extraction of oil droplets from the cells and algal oil were determined to range from $59 . characterization. Cyclotella cryptica. Under Aquatic Species Program subcontracts. biosynthesis of the storage carbohydrate. 2007).000 m2 outdoor. production. A Test Facility in Roswell. which Microbial Products. but lower oil producing. conversion of lipids to gasoline) species in the collection were shown to accumulate as were evaluated (Milne et al. 1987 and in desert regions of the Southwest (Maxwell et al. 1990).S. Conversion of Although nutrient deficiency actually reduces the algal oils to ethyl. depth research. 1990). and thus the enzyme was extensively University of California-Berkeley. Sheehan et al. Cost-effective methods of harvesting the necessity for very low-cost culture systems. Under inducing conditions. plus several under the nutrient stress conditions (Roessler.g. 1988) with the hope of eventually turning down the Sufficient resources were identified for the production flow of carbon through these pathways. chrysolaminarin saline water. However.. 1996). it became possible to manipulate the expression of utilization (bubbled through the algae culture) was shown ACCase in an attempt to increase oil yields. harvesting via flocculation even with optimistic assumptions about CO2 credits and was deemed particularly encouraging (Sheehan et al. Inc. other biofuel of lipid biosynthesis. 1985). it became clear that novel solutions would be of aquifers.. smaller ponds for inocula production. and conversion to fuel are critical to successful In addition. In addition.$186 per purification of the oil are also cost-intensive steps. Detailed techno-economic analyses underlined process steps. New Mexico. distance from CO2 point sources. strains from the wild. such and dewatering algal biomass and lipid extraction. issues associated with such methods. stable production of algal successful transformation of microalgae (Dunahay et al. or engine testing was carried out. The raceway design suggesting that it may play a role as a “spigot” controlling was based on the “high rate pond” system developed at lipid synthesis. Low attempts at metabolic engineering identified a pathway to nighttime and winter temperatures limited productivity in modify the gene encoding in the ACCase enzyme. The termination of many billions of gallons of fuel. and other needed for biological productivity and various problematic issues. 1998).. (Weissman et al. primarily in C. petroleum consumption. growth was conducted in California. as unlined open ponds (Benemann and Oswald. analyses led to differing conclusions on fuel cost. and New Mexico under conditions of insufficient silicon (a component of (Sheehan et al.After promising microalgae were identified. Hawaii. Overview  . some process options (e.. enzymes involved in the Aquatic Species Program. productivity improvements. ACCase activity was found to increase deep). Different cost process step that is highly energy.. primarily triacylglycerides (TAGs) (Chisti. was the focus demonstration-scale outdoor microalgal cultivation of many of the biochemical studies. These initial to be more than 90% with careful pH control. scale-up. The 4 1. This catalyzes the first step in the biosynthesis of fatty acids used facility utilized two 1. studying Program and shown to be one of the less challenging this response led to valuable insights into the mechanisms aspects of the technology. Of particular note was the Outdoor the cell wall) is a trigger for increased oil production. Harvesting is a the single largest influence on fuel cost. costs of these resources can vary widely depending During the course of the Aquatic Species Program upon such factors as land leveling requirements. 1998). purification. cost. the Roswell area. and the efficiency of CO2 1995). For example. Studies focused on suitable land. 50 g/m2/day. One serious problem encountered was that the desired starting strain was often outgrown by faster Additional studies focused on storage carbohydrate reproducing. biomass was demonstrated. and CO2 resources (power plants). but studies examined the ability of many strains to induce failed to fully address the scale. operated by key enzyme is acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase).. cryptica were characterized (Roessler.. The systems were characterized (Roessler. 1989).. as biosynthesis of these compounds competes for fixed carbon units that might otherwise be used for Several resource assessments were conducted under the lipid formation. 1988). 1999. the commercially viable strains for oil production. however. but overall biomass productivity averaged no effect was seen on lipid production in these preliminary around 10 g/m2/day with occasional periods approaching experiments (Jarvis et al. and environmental lipid accumulation under conditions of nutrient stress. but Among various techniques.and capital-intensive. but no further fuel much as 60% of their dry weight in the form of lipid. further Aquatic Species Program focused on solvent systems. estimated costs for unextracted 1998). paddlewheel-mixed raceway ponds. suggesting that the of the Aquatic Species Program in 1996 halted further technology could have the potential to have a significant development of these potentially promising paths to impact on U. an oleaginous diatom. shallow (10-20 cm for TAG synthesis. In this species. With the advent of the first successful in that long-term.

increasingly focusing on algal biofuels research. Similar to the findings of the Aquatic lifeblood of the burgeoning biofuels industry today. which was trading at less than $20/barrel in 1995. It was concluded that algal biofuels would not be cost-competitive with petroleum. Recent initiatives. Overview  5 . such as a major Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency solicitation. affordable. However.S. Detailed results from the Aquatic Species Program research investment are available to the public in more than 100 electronic documents on the NREL Web site at www. Primary efforts were focused on open ocean culture of Abundant. A sizable and strategically structured investment from DOE. Additionally. there is no parallel agricultural Since the end of DOE’s Aquatic Species Program in enterprise equivalent for cultivating algae at a similar 1996. significantly outpacing government funding. national labs are developing a viable and sustainable algal biofuel industry. the Department of Defense. funding levels are beginning to increase. federal funding for algal research has come scale. and public-private partnerships. Office of Science. it also became clear that significant barriers would need to be overcome in order to achieve an economically feasible process. policymakers. macroalgae for biofuels and beneficial re-use of CO2. the work highlighted the need to understand and optimize the biological mechanisms of algal lipid accumulation and to find creative. a research initiative to determine the technical and economic feasibility of macroalgae cultivation and Opportunity and Challenges conversion to fuels. Office of Fossil Energy.nrel. DOE sponsored the Marine Biomass 1. Courtesey of CCMP.3 Algae-to-Biofuels: Program. needed to support commercialization activities. Also from 1968-1990. and several DOE Small Business Innovative to reduce the level of risk and uncertainty associated with Research (SBIR) request for proposals. a number of U. Private investment in algal biofuels This Roadmap seeks to lay down the first comprehensive has been increasing at a dramatic rate over the last few state of technology summary for fuels and co-products years. Species Program. 1987). the National to tackle the challenges of algal biofuels is thus Science Foundation. feedstock mix for producing advanced biofuels. the Air Force Based on the information provided at the Workshop. Further. that include investigating microalgae. and the Department of Agriculture. researchers concluded that algal-derived Algae must be considered as part and parcel of the SNG would not be cost-competitive with fossil fuel gas. it was Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) algal bio-jet determined that a great deal of RD&D is still necessary program. cost-effective solutions for the culture and process engineering challenges. In contrast to the development of cellulosic biofuels which benefit from a direct agricultural and process Research from 1996 to Present engineering lineage.. and Biomass Program are all funding research activities By reviewing the technology gaps and cross-cutting needs. In particular. these activities must be accompanied with DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy conducive developments on the non-technical fronts – (ARPA-E). and sustainable feedstocks are the California kelp. and the Roadmap aims to guide researchers and engineers. Cyclotella cells. particularly to substitute natural gas Today (SNG) via anaerobic digestion (Bird and Benson. and the private sector in implementing a nationally coordinated effort toward Additionally. 1. 1998). federal agencies.gov/publications.barrel (Sheehan et al. cyanobacteria. from algal feedstocks and to document the feasibility and techno-economic challenges associated with commercial scaling up of processes. State funding programs and research support from private Technology and Analysis Challenges industry also make up a significant proportion of research funding. Overall. regulations and standards. the Aquatic Species Program was successful in demonstrating the feasibility of algal culture as a source of oil and resulted in important advances in the technology. suggest that the algae-to-biofuels process so it can be commercialized.

thermochemical/catalytic conversion. FEEDSTOCK and mixotrophic growth) Algal • Achieve robust and stable cultures at a commercial scale Cultivation • Optimize system for algal productivity of fuel precursors (e. side reactions. industrial enzymes. and durability Conversion • Reduce contaminants and reaction inhibitors • Minimize process energy intensity and emissions over the life cycle • Achieve high conversion rates under scale-up conditions • Identify and evaluate the co-production of value-added chemicals. OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ALGAL BIOFUELS: TECHNOLOGY GOALS PROCESS R&D CHALLENGES STEP • Sample strains from a wide variety of environments for maximum diversity • Develop small-scale. energy balance.g. activity. fertilizers. and thermal management PURSUING STRATEGIC R&D: TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS Given the multiple technology and system options and their interdependency. centrifugation. high-throughput screening technologies Algal Biology • Develop open-access database and collections of existing strains with detailed characterization • Investigate genetics and biochemical pathways for production of fuel precursors • Improve on strains for desired criteria by gene manipulation techniques or breeding FEEDSTOCK • Investigate multiple approaches (i.g. animal/fish feeds.. energy. and materials from algal remnants (e. 6 1. and bioproducts under different storage and transport scenarios for INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE Distribution contamination. climate. Overview  . selective extraction. carrying capacity. supercritical fluid.g. flocculation. weather impacts. pressure. sedimentation. open. dissolved air floatation.. hybrid. direct fuel production. and nutrient resource requirements for siting of microalgae Resources (heterotrophic & photoautotrophic) and macroalgae production systems and Siting • Integrate with wastewater treatment and/or CO2 emitter industries (in the case of heterotrophic approach) • Address salt balance. water.. and end-product variability and Utilization • Optimize distribution for energy and costs in the context of facility siting • Comply with all regulatory and customer requirements for utilization (e. and mechanized seaweed harvesting) Harvesting and • Minimize process energy intensity Dewatering • Lower capital and operating costs • Assess each technology option in terms of overall system compatibility and sustainability • Investigate multiple approaches (e. bioplastics. filtration.. microwave.g. energy. and secretion) Extraction and • Achieve high yield of desired intermediates. biochemical conversion.. and anaerobic digestion) Fuel • Improve catalyst specificity. engine performance and material compatibility) • Assess and characterize land. and separations CONVERSION CONVERSION • Investigate multiple approaches to liquid transportation fuels (e.g. subcritical water. water & nutrient reuse. closed. including quality and safety trials to meet applicable standards • Characterize algal biomass..g. and coastal/off-shore systems. phototrophic. water. biogas. sonication. heterotrophic.e. and nutrients • Identify and address environmental risks and impacts • Investigate multiple harvesting approaches (e. preserve co-products Fractionation • Minimize process energy intensity • Investigate recycling mechanisms to minimize waste • Address scaling challenges. stability. solvent systems. intermediates. and surfactants) Co-products • Optimize co-product extraction and recovery • Conduct market analyses. biofuel.. such as operational temperature. an integrated techno-economic modeling and analysis spanning the entire algae to biofuels supply chain is crucial in guiding research efforts along select pathways that offer the most opportunity to practically enable a viable and sustainable algae-based biofuels and co-products industry. lipids) • Sustainably and cost-effectively manage the use of land.

G. 24.Regulations and Standards Public-Private Partnerships While the Roadmap’s primary objective is to highlight A collaborative framework of public-private partnerships the technical challenges and opportunities associated offers an opportunity to jointly address the technological.. Oak Ridge. 31(6). there are no existing standards for various aspects of algal biofuels production. However. Oswald. 1999. 219-232. & Roessler. 294–306. 1990. E. Biodiesel from microalgae.G. Roessler. NTIS# H CP/ T. Biotechnology Advances. 223–242. Y. 25(3). E. However. ORNL/TM-2006/66.D. Journal of Biological Chemistry. Biological transformation of solar energy. 21(3). W.. regulation.J. 1605(UC-61). and policy and regulatory challenges as that RD&D activities need to be carried out under a resolution of these issues will likely require participation framework of standards.G. Effects of silicon deficiency on lipid composition and metabolism in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica. consumption standards.. Dunahay. 100–112. 1004–1011. P. Algal from multiple entities.. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Microalgae for oil: strain selection. & Roessler. Adv. T. Rodolfi. T. W. 394–400. et al. Also. Being a nascent industry. & Golueke. Roessler. P. P. biofuels and co-products) comply with applicable workforce needed to allow this industry to grow. 1988.. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. 2008.US Patent 5928932 Abstract. et al.G. Phycol. J. with shape-selective zeolites.. J.. induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor.R. Pursoff. Genetic transformation of the diatoms Cyclotella cryptica and Navicula saprophila. Engineering Design and Cost Analysis of a Large-Scale Microalgae Biomass System.A. Overview  7 . supporting education are legally and safely developed and the end-products will be critical to create intellectual talent and the (i. P. Milne. Catalytic conversion of microalgae and vegetable oils to premium gasoline. 1993.L. structuring public- biofuel developers need to foresee and understand the private partnerships for successful ventures is a challenge potentially applicable legal requirements early on in the in itself given the myriad issues and interests. 1978. & Ohlrogge.J.. 1. it is recognized economic. Evans. References Benemann. Final Report to the US Energy Department. Perlack. 2005. C. Microbiol.E. Solar Energy Research... Meier. RD&D activities can inform further development of applicable laws and standards..B. Cloning and characterization of the gene that encodes acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in the alga Cyclotella cryptica. Biotechnol Bioeng. R. J. such as research and development process to help ensure algae intellectual property rights. 1960. 2009]. Jarvis.J. 2007. R. P. Journal of Phycology. 1995.e. 1955. 179–183. & Nagle.. TN. 91. Biological cycles in the transformation of solar energy into useful fuels.. and policy. Chisti. Jarvis. & Oswald. 102(1). L. 11. with algal biofuels commercialization.. Appl. N.. R.. Isolated gene encoding an enzyme with UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and phosphoglucomutase activities from Cyclotella cryptica .G. Biomass. Available at: [Accessed November 3.

and strain robustness. and generation. products. some algal strains take weeks to months to affect every step of the algae to biofuels supply chain. Collection sites and would provide fatty acid profiles. other gene markers. 1984). within an aqueous habitat. can include public lands as well as various sites within many strains also secrete metabolites into the growth our national and state park systems. Traditionally. they typically live in aquatic environments and are capable of photosynthesis. 2005). versatility possible. 8 2. high-throughput automated isolation techniques involving Screening and Selection fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) have proven to be extremely useful (Sieracki et al.2. streams. pH. locations to maximize genetic diversity. typically found in planktonic (free floating) and benthic algae have been unified based on their ability to carry out (attached) environments. The selection of specific locations can be determined by sophisticated site Screening for metabolite production may involve selection criteria through the combined use of dynamic determining the cellular composition of proteins. cultivation and strain development.or eukaryotic. Natural Habitats maximum cell density. a helpful screen for oil production would terrestrial environments in a variety of geographical allow for distinction between neutral and polar lipids. Algal Biology The term “algae” commonly refers to a diverse mix of Additionally. lakes. Because of Isolation and Characterization of morphological similarities when comparing many algal Naturally Occurring Algae species. of automated systems that provide information regarding Furthermore. whereas benthic algae may single or multi-cellular and pro. 2005). Screening Criteria and Methods new strains should be isolated from a wide variety of An ideal screen would cover three major areas: growth environments to provide the largest range in metabolic physiology. or identify and maintain promising algal specimens for in the case of closely related strains. CO2 levels). type and strain of algae being cultivated will ultimately However.e. and cyanobacteria (historically known as traditional cultivation techniques may be used such as blue-green algae). For large-scale sampling and isolation efforts. macroalgae For isolation of new strains from natural habitats. tolerance to environmental variables (temperature. questions medium. and though find application in biofilm-based production facilities. Algae include Isolation Techniques microalgae (unicellular eukaryotic organisms). this is not always the case. brackish. The term growth physiology encompasses a number of parameters such as maximum specific growth rate. ponds. on the cultivation approaches and fuel precursor desired. and measuring the productivity of analysis tools. which includes fresh. algae are organisms from different kingdoms of life. large-scale sampling efforts should be all parameters simultaneously would be helpful. and new approaches are needed to develop Sampling strategies should not only account for spatial screening methods for extracellular materials. hypersaline.. oxygen levels. Furthermore. the enrichment cultures (Andersen and Kawachi. and soil (Round. Algal Biology  . the development and hyper-saline environments. 2. Ecosystems to be sampled could include the organism regarding metabolites useful for biofuels aquatic (i. distribution but also for the temporal succession brought about by seasonal variations of algae in their habitats. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data and and carbohydrates.1 Strain Isolation. metabolite production. lipids. Due to their diverse characteristics. In all cases. The exact screens employed would depend geothermal springs. salinity. 2004). rivers. Planktonic algae may be used photosynthesis and live in aquatic habitats. acidic and alkaline environments) and For example.. marine require significant experimental effort. Because it is not yet known how algae will be cultivated on a mass scale. Algae can be in suspended mass cultures. actual strain identification should be based on The goals of algae isolation and screening efforts are to molecular methods such as rRNA sequence comparison. Because all of these parameters habitats ranging from freshwater to brackish water. be isolated by traditional methods (for a comprehensive review of algal culturing techniques. Some of these could prove to be valuable co- of ownership of isolated strains should be considered. and Algae can be isolated from a variety of natural aqueous nutrient requirements. see Anderson. coordinated to ensure broadest coverage of environments and to avoid duplication of efforts. (seaweeds). maps. oceans.

To obtain versatile and robust strains common method for determination of lipid content in algae. is the most nutrient requirements. and breeding and metabolic engineering approaches to improve though these methods require much less biomass (as little biofuels production. ) (Bligh and Dyer. Plasmids and Phages transcends simple depository functions. Proteomics. Strain administration (number in collection. The establishment studies revealed that algae strains tested in the laboratory of a central strain. such as growth rate and metabolite properties. Transcriptomics. Strain properties: Cytological. National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton at the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences in West Boothbay At this time. et al. or in connection with outside collaborators. they could potentially are rapid screening procedures necessary for the biofuels serve as nuclei for the development of national algae field. 1998). Biological interaction (symbiosis.For mass culture of a given algal strain. such as mating capability or versatility regarding productivity. Not only document data on strains. 2007. no central database exists that provides global 9. Therefore. some may have lost original phenotypes. For both direct using lipid-soluble dyes have also been described. Strain name (species. Environment and strain history (specific habitat. However. 1959). native al. community stability. pH) & support research on determining strain characteristics. but it requires a significant quantity of biomass (Ahlgren et it would be prudent to consider the isolation of new. which data. other countries.. cultures (Sheehan et al. temperature. and predators present in a given environment. basic research resources. molecular.500 strains. but could prove extremely useful for the identification resource centers.. but it is very difficult to obtain resilience. Role of Culture Collections as National reference) Algae Data Resource Centers 2. Algal Biology  9 . germination conditions cryopreservation. Some minimal growth information is available from includes parameters such as culture consistency. Practical applications (general and industrial) information on the characteristics of currently available 10. 1991. Further improvements in analytical methodology could be made through the As the major culture collections already collect and development of solid-state screening methods. open access repository could accelerate do not always perform similarly in outdoor mass R&D of algae-based biofuels production systems. At present. Solvent extraction. with technologies is an important step in enabling the testing about 3. Previous robustness of particular existing strains. Mutants biology. valuable strains. for example. pathogenicity. metabolites. The function of a culture collection often 6. and phylogeny either by themselves 8. subspecies name. existing culture collections. with more than 2. it will be important to isolate a wide as a single cell). The culture collections such as UTEX (The Culture Collection development of small-scale but high-throughput screening of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin. to determine a strain’s robustness. Protection of intellectual property in private or Metabolomics) 2.. protect genetic material. biochemical.. It could also reduce dissemination of detailed information about potentially the number of redundant screens of algal species. it has not yet been established if these variety of algae for assembly into a culture collection that methods are valid across a wide range of algal strains (Elsey will serve as a bioresource for further biofuels research. de la Jara et al. small-scale simulations of mass A number of algal strains are currently available from culture conditions will need to be performed. Culture collections are necessary to preserve the diversity preservation) of natural habitats. and susceptibility to more detailed information on growth. the bottleneck in screening large numbers of Harbor. Texas). algal strains.000 strains. Culture collection organizations of species (particularly in mixed field samples) necessary could be responsible for the gathering and for the future of algal ecology. Growth conditions (media. taxonomy. They may also 7. and provide 3. 2003). only a few major collector) algal collection centers exist in the United States and 4. Maine). algae stems from a lack of high-throughput methodologies because many of the strains in these collections have been that would allow simultaneous screening of multiple cultivated for several decades. toxicity) Currently. it is also industry has further exacerbated the flow of relevant strain important to consider the strain’s robustness. that can be used for mass culture in biofuels applications. Fluorescent methods strains directly from unique environments. Omics data (Genomics. Information could include: 1. They currently maintain thousands & screening results of different algal strains and support the research and industrial community with their expertise in algae 5. and CCMP (The Provasoli-Guillard of hundreds to thousands of different algal isolates.

Species with sequenced genomes and transgenic secretion actually makes the product more readily capabilities are the most amenable to investigating cellular available. and high cell densities can be achieved. lipids. For example. to providing information on basic cellular processes then collection of the atmosphere above the culture will regarding the synthesis of fuel precursors. However. but we cannot be certain that laboratory strains unfavorably alter fluidics properties or provide a carbon and production strains will be sufficiently related to allow source favoring growth of contaminants. there may be practical problems systems to consider studying: species or strains amenable to consider. If the carbon source is utilized by the cell. this is not generally a problem with well- isoprenoids. the number of algal systems that can be studied in depth has to be limited because a critical mass of researchers Secretion of Products or Intermediates is required to make progress on a given species. Botryococcus was shown in the Aquatic Species Program that not all braunii)..volume/ (therapeutic proteins and secondary metabolites). In such a strain. contamination by undesired microbes living off the carbon Possible fuel types of interest could include H2. transported into the cell (Ceron Garcia et al. For example. viruses could also be a useful phenotype. which will necessitate the use or strains with characteristics useful for large-scale of closed bioreactors.g. Adapting if sustainable secretion could be achieved. Resistance to predators and be attractive attributes of algal strains. Pilot-scale experimentation and further metabolic engineering is required to evaluate Culture stability over long periods will be a key to low cost possible advantages and disadvantages of secretion. although there are algae known processes since the basic tools are in place. or methane (via anaerobic that are currently deployed worldwide at massive scale to digestion). Also to be considered is whether growth. In some species. secretion for lessons from the former to be applied to the latter. alcohols (either directly or established fully-heterotrophic fermentation technologies through biomass conversion). Algal Biology  . However. which simplifies characterization Given the diversity of algae. or a screen of environmental isolates for species 10 2. or co-product to be produced. Also the ability addition of supplemental carbon results in increased lipid to flocculate without addition of chemical flocculating accumulation (Xu et al. supplements. However. growth in both Targeting Desired Fuel Product or Intermediate light and dark periods is possible. Co-products could include pharmaceuticals manufacture everything from cancer drugs to high. and thus are not free to form an organic large-scale culturing (Sheehan. 1998). and species be necessary to isolate it.. 2006). However. an abundance of exported lipids could feasible. if the desired product is volatile.cost commodities such as lysine and ethanol. carbohydrates. production of biofuels. even under mixotrophic agents could reduce the costs of harvest as long as it could conditions where the substrate is not known to be be controlled to avoid settling in the cultivation system. Even that other strains will be chosen for production. intermediate.Selecting Algal Model Systems that naturally make abundant amounts of the desired for Study product.. cellular metabolism is already geared toward production. Other traits like the ability to grow to Mixotrophic Growth high cell density in continuous culture may allow a strain to be maintained while at the same time reducing the amount Heterotrophic or mixotrophic growth capabilities may of water to be processed daily. 2002). food low. they are still associated with the cells in a lipid strains that grow well in the laboratory are suitable for biofilm matrix. it is not clear the lessons learned from laboratory model strains to what the effect of a lipid emulsion in an algal culture would strains known to be capable of large-scale growth may be be. A potential disadvantage of the addition One consideration in choosing model systems is the of external carbon sources is the possibility of increased type of fuel. it to secrete long-chain hydrocarbons (e. there are two types of algal model harvesting step. of either intermediates or products into the growth medium could make these compounds vulnerable to contaminating Useful Algal Characteristics microbes for catabolism. such as. a large number of model and possible strain development for production. 2006). systems could be studied. or materials for nanotechnology (in the case of the silica cell wall of diatoms). in a practical sense. Finally. so it is possible hydrocarbon phase in solution (Banerjee et al. Rapid growth is important both for overall productivity and the ability to compete with Capability for Heterotrophic or contaminating strains. The ability of an algal species to secrete fuel precursors may be attractive because it could reduce or skip the cell In relation to biofuels. A reasonable first approach to identify model species that are optimal for the production of a desired fuel is through a survey of the literature. source.

with lipid these processes if we are to better engineer the capture accumulation in macroalgae typically being less than 5% of and utilization of light energy for biomass production. Nelson and Yocum.. indicating that starch is an important storage reaching more distant cells (Christi. algae. 2003). Lipids and carbohydrates. 2002). preventing it from et al. 2002). therefore... 2003. It may be useful to carry out photosynthetic of carbon between alternative storage products will efficiency studies in algae similar to those that have be important for metabolic engineering of algae. affecting growth rate. 1994. the been done in plant systems to understand carbon flux in efficiency of photosynthesis is a crucial determinate biosynthetic and degradative pathways (Lytovchenko et al. 1994. Even when compound and its synthesis precedes oil accumulation. Mcdermid and Stuercke. exposed to high light. are all potential biofuels lipids and/or carbohydrates could be very useful for biofuels or biofuel precursors. Under stress conditions such as high light or (Long et al.. 2004. and Niyogi. Starch is a common carbon and energy algal photosynthetic processes (Nelson et al. Cyanobacteria and macroalgae. 2008).2 Algal Physiology strategies to prevent the over-absorption of light energy. Ruuska tend to absorb all the incoming light. 1994. that is the desired fuel precursor. a potentially important implication limitations of algal photosystems regarding light utilization. Allen et al. pathway analysis.. and predictive Photosynthesis and Light Utilization modeling (Vemuri and Aristidou. and exhibit photosynthetic efficiency and lipid production There is still much to learn about the dynamics and at least an order of magnitude greater than terrestrial crop regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus (Eberhard et al. More emphasis should be placed on understanding a general rule. 1991). It is. been carried out for plants (Zhu et al. Sweetlove production. In and starch metabolism was most active before the lipid high cell density cultures. algal photosystems have built-in More recently. starch transiently accumulated culture at greater than laboratory scale is not utilized.2. storage compound in plants and algae. 2005). along with biologically Knowing how and when carbon is partitioned in a cell into produced hydrogen and alcohols. Regardless of the cultivation practices used 2.. 2003). Metabolic networks have been reconstructed in various microbes from genomic and transcriptomic data. Though theoretical However. and lipids) is critically needed (Boyle and Morgan. carbon partitioning in algae is less understood biomass productivity values in the range of 100-200 g/ and research on how algal cells control the flux and m2/day have been presented (Chisti. in their productivity. 2007). 2008. plants (Hu et al. accumulate large amounts of TAG (30-60% of dry weight). photoinhibition or the reduction O2 and organic macromolecules such as carbohydrates of photosynthesis due to light damage can still occur and lipids. 2009. therefore. accumulate mostly carbohydrates. it was shown that such as triacylglycerols (TAG) as their main carbon storage reducing the size of the chlorophyll antenna can increase compounds. Libourel and Shachar-Hill. there remains be inter-convertible. however. Schwender et al. although concentrations approaching 20% lipid have been reported Carbon Partitioning and Metabolism in some species (Chu et al. total dry weight (Mcdermid and Stuercke. 2005.. some microalgae accumulate lipids In an effort to overcome this barrier. A fundamental understanding of both cultivation process design and strain improvement ‘global’ regulatory networks that control the partitioning projects. as 2008). 2006. for biofuel production. carbohydrates.. under harvesting solar energy and converting CO2 and water to certain light regimes. A large majority of and Biochemistry absorbed incident light is dissipated as heat and could be Many algae are photosynthetic organisms capable of considered “wasted. Algal Biology  11 . Theoretical productivity is an important concept. which can lead to oxidative damage. there is no partitioning of photosynthetically fixed carbon into various current consensus on the true maximum productivity of groups of major macromolecules (i.” Even with this photoprotection. 1999). and shares the Eberhard et al. Yang et al. 2007).. 2007 and 2008) Further.. because it can be used to set achievable goals for 2009. possible that TAG and starch could to maximize light exposure (see Chapter 3).e. 2008). knowledge of metabolic pathways.1). understand the metabolic pathways and processes that Understanding carbon partitioning will require extensive generate them in order to advance biofuels production. It is. biomass 2007. and potentially. Research has also When algae are cultivated photosynthetically. the percent of biomass and Fernie. 2002).. Certain microalgal species also naturally the efficiency of light utilization (Polle et al.. Foyer et al. proteins. studies in higher plants showed that when 2. a link between starch and lipid metabolism has There are many good reviews available that cover basic been established. 1994.. important to strain development and designing cultivation strategies. Krause and same precursors with the storage lipid TAG (Exhibit Weis.. In young Arabidopsis seeds The majority of light that falls on a photosynthetic algal and Brassica embryos. cells nearer to the light source accumulation phase (Kang and Rawsthorne. nutrient starvation..

The acyltransferases be broken down into simpler sugars before conversion involved in TAG synthesis may exhibit preferences into biofuels. 2008). It could.starch synthesis was impaired or inhibited. plant embryos or absence of other structural polysaccharides varies or seeds accumulated 40% less oil (Periappuram et al. In the final step of TAG synthesis. feedstock potential. Some red In microalgae. an enzyme wall. are 3-phosphate. If carbohydrates Lipid Synthesis and Regulation are to be used as fuel precursors. and complex carbohydrates that they use for carbon storage and cell structure. Diatoms are also unique among algae for the presence of silica in their cell walls. Yoo et al. use 16 or carbohydrates such as laminaran. Dephosphorylation of PA catalyzed by a specific end product (Bird and Benson. been identified and partially characterized (Horn et al. envelope similar to those of gram-negative bacteria. 12 2. while some algae lack synthesis. cell walls entirely. Cell walls can also be a technical barrier. and thus may play an for example. biochemical feedstocks for conversion to liquid fuels. Vigeolas et al. Several formation of TAG in plants first involves algae commonly use starch for energy storage. accumulate well as of neutral storage lipids such as TAG.1). Since polysaccharides may still prove useful as intermediates diglycerides are usually present in high amounts in rapidly to other types of conversion processes and final fuels. recently been demonstrated in bacteria. However. which are important cellulose-based cell walls and accumulating starch as potential fuel precursors. some red algae and dinoflagellates. 2004).. naturally or under stress conditions. or efficiently extracting biofuel precursors of TAG (Hu et al.. 1988). Fatty acids produced in the chloroplast are sequentially 2000a and 2000b).. be fruitful to Most cyanobacteria have a peptidoglycan layer and cell further research de novo starch synthesis.. Other abundant polysaccharides. Athenstaedt and Daum. While these results provide cellulose and have other polymers that provide structure an indication that starch synthesis is linked to lipid to the cell (Raven et al. for specific acyl CoA molecules. 1987). or fucoidin as 18 carbon fatty acids as precursors. these phosphatase releases diacylglycerol (DAG). plants and yeast based. for The synthesis of cellular and organelle membranes. and extraction processes. growing cultures. and and interaction with lipid metabolism in algae. are encased in a polysaccharide sheath (Hoiczyk and Hansel. 2000). featuring rigid such as triacyglycerols (TAG). 2006). including de novo fatty acid synthesis in the stroma of plastids. resulting in the formation of the central considered less suitable for ethanol fermentation because metabolite phosphatidic acid (PA) (Ohlrogge and Browse. for example for fermentation to produce alcohols. greatly. via three sequential acyl transfers (from acyl CoA) These major storage polysaccharides represent potential in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Exhibit 2. degradation. There are also many algae that completely lack 2000. therefore. must typically 2006.. Microorganisms capable of fermenting laminarin and TAG biosynthesis in algae has been proposed to occur mannitol from Laminaria hyperborea to ethanol have via the above Kennedy pathway described in plants. the redox balance favors formation of pyruvate as the 1995). carbohydrates. (Roessler. 2008. as example many brown algae and diatoms. transferred from CoA to positions 1 and 2 of glycerol- for example alginate found in many brown algae. 1971. The major pathway for the their main carbohydrate storage compound.. but like those from plants. An important lesson is the recognition of the diversity of algal polysaccharides and cell walls. Other algae. though their physical structure and the presence in an acyl CoA-independent way (Arabolaza et al. it is important to Primary Pathway for TAG Synthesis determine the predominate types that are present. Some algae. the nature of the interaction is unknown. it may be of interest to research these TAG intermediates. 1992). Algal Biology  . when trying to access DNA for genetic important role in determining the final acyl composition manipulations. Cyanobacteria often store large quantities incorporation of the fatty acid into a glycerol backbone of glycogen (Chao and Bowen. Alternative pathways to convert from cells in mass culture. and the Algal Carbohydrates technical challenges these structures may present in strain Algae are incredibly diverse in the kind of simple manipulation. These structures can be an important source of that is unique to TAG biosynthesis (Lung and Weselake.. Another important consideration in algal strains is the a third fatty acid is transferred to the vacant position 3 composition and structure of the polysaccharide cell of DAG by diacylglycerol acyltransferase. TAG is formed by food reserves. such an interaction has been also algae also have a thick extracellular matrix composed indicated by studies on the diatom Cyclotella cryptica of important products such as agar or carrageenan. many membrane lipids and/or carbohydrates to TAG have algal cell walls from different groupings are cellulose. mannitol. 2002). As mentioned above. accumulate significant quantities of neutral storage lipids Many green microalgae are plant-like.

laboratory (Hu et al. Similarly.. Thus. such as phosphatidylcholine (PC) and strains to production strains. de novo fatty acid and lipid synthesis should Understanding lipid regulation can help to maximize be studied in order to identify key genes. Accase: acetyl GDAT? CoA carboxylase. ACP: acyl carrier protein. If the or culture conditions. Triacylglycerol Lipid Body Dahlqvist et al. the annotation of genes involved in lipid The regulation of the synthesis of fatty acids and metabolism in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii TAG in algae is relatively poorly understood.. Glc6P: Phospholipids glucose-6-phosphate. it could be a challenge to extrapolate information DAG can also be used directly as substrates for synthesis learned about lipid biosynthesis and regulation in laboratory of polar lipids. Diacylglycerol (DAG) ER: Endoplasmic reticulum. CO 2 Glc6P Starch AGPPase Central Starch Glc6P 3-PGA 3-PGA Amylases Metabolic Pyruvate Mitochondria PDH CO 2 Pyruvate Oxaloacetate Acetyl -CoA Chloroplast ACCase TCA cycle Acetyl-CoA KAS I KAS II Glycolipids SAD Galactolipase? C16 . If this proves to have not yet been studied in algae. Stahl et al. Because fatty acids are common precursors for the Alternative Pathways to Storage Lipids synthesis of both membrane lipids and TAG. the de-novo Kennedy Pathway. Algal Biology  13 . PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase (putative pathways were proposed in dashed lines). it will be difficult galactolipids. These pathways are worth investigating to use information regarding lipid biosynthesis in plants when developing strains for improved lipid production. 2004). DAGT PDAT? PDAT: Phospholipids: DAG acyltransferase. involved in lipid metabolism in algae. This has revealed that algal lipid metabolism may be different lack of understanding may contribute to why the lipid from that in plants. 1998). PA and be true. Such pathways property of individual species or strains. and other 2. GDAT: putative Acetyl- glycolipids: DAG acyltransferase. KAS: 3-ketoacyl-ACP. 2000. 2005).. pathways. ER AGPPase: ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. the potential pathway for lipid basal lipid and TAG content may represent an intrinsic formation from starch reserves mentioned earlier. enzymes and new scenarios for lipid production and strain improvement. algal cell coordinates the distribution of the precursors to and the relative contribution of these individual pathways distinct destinations or how the inter-conversion between to overall TAG formation may depend on environmental the two types of lipids occurs needs to be elucidated. how the Algae may possess multiple pathways for TAG synthesis. 2008. as indicated by the presence and/or yields obtained from algal mass culture efforts fall absence of certain pathways and by the size of the gene short of the high values (50 to 60%) observed in the families that relate to various activities (Riekhof et al. to develop hypotheses for strain improvement in algae.1 Major pathways for fatty acid Phosphatidic acid and TAG synthesis in plants and algae 3-PGA: 3-phosphoglycerate..C18 CoA Figure 2. Sheehan et al. Analyzing different algae could help ability to control the fate of fatty acids varies among algal to elucidate the possible pathways of TAG synthesis: the taxonomic groups or even between isolates or strains. Moreover. if any. As an example..

with acyl earlier). with growing evidence of induce over-production of reactive oxygen species. Chloroplast membranes control the exchange of metabolites between the plastid and the cytoplasm. 1998. The de novo TAG synthesis pathway can serve phospho. and et al. and other macromolecules. the role of oleosins in the biogenesis of plant lipid bodies. Algal chloroplasts the carotenoid pathway are sequestered into cytosolic contain monogalactosyldiacylglycerol as their main lipid lipid bodies. there have been relatively few studies on lipid glycerolipids assembled at the ER are then returned to bodies in algae compared with plants and fungi. transport chain under high light or other stress conditions. 14 2.. β-carotene.. This and lipid fate (Benning. a close relationship is often may also play a more active and diverse role in the stress found between neutral lipids like TAG and the membrane response. cell division. It has been suggested that oleosins may be primarily Oxidative Stress and Storage Lipids associated with the stabilization of storage lipid bodies during the severe hydrodynamic stresses of dehydration Under environmental stress conditions (such as nutrient and rehydration that occurs in many seeds (Murphy. This relationship may be both metabolic. which direct physical continuities between lipid bodies and may in turn cause inhibition of photosynthesis and damage bilayer membranes. Lipid trafficking of lipid-body biogenesis in plants has focused largely on is. the exact relationship between oxidative stress. Synthesis of Lipid bodies may dock with different regions of the ER TAG and deposition of TAG into cytosolic lipid bodies and plasma membrane. phatidylethanolamine or stress conditions as degradation of chloroplasts occurs. TAG synthesis may also phosphatidlyglycerol ( ~15%) (Harwood. or with other organelles such as may be. The molecules their lipid composition dominates extracts obtained from (e. Current work in plants is understandable in view of their exclusive localization is focused on deciphering lipid transport across plastid on lipid-body surfaces. excess membrane lipids. Nevertheless. 1992). membranes or they can be exported to the ER and hydrocarbons and very long-chain ω-3 and ω -6 fatty assembled into lipids for cellular membranes. In addition to load or discharge their lipid cargo (Zehmer et al. the TAG synthesis pathway body accumulation occurs. or astaxanthin) produced in cells under favorable growth conditions. Huang. Zhekisheva et al. The thylakoids of chloroplasts are with secondary carotenoid synthesis in algae (Rabbani the main intracellular membranes of eukaryotic algae. Some acids. As mentioned Lipid Body Formation and Relationship earlier. as rapid lipid energy storage compound. Because of the potential importance of TAG play an important role for cell survival under stress. and spatial. and other components into form of TAG.and glyco. proteins. 2002). starvation). with exceptions. 2001). It has as acyl donors. some algal cells stop division and accumulate TAG as the main carbon storage compound. with smaller amounts of digalactosyldiacylglycerol ‘sunscreen’ to prevent or reduce excess light from striking ( ~20%). thereby serving as a mechanism to been proposed that these alternative pathways that convert “detoxify” these compounds and deposit them in the starch. Algal Biology  . toxic fatty acids excluded from the membrane system the fate of these abundant lipids remains unclear. Under high light stress. and thus relax the over-reduced electron related to storage lipid formation requires further study.g. there are now doubts about it relates to lipid formation and lipid trafficking. In order to better understand lipid to membrane lipids. stress conditions on lipid production in algae.. sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (~15%) and the chloroplast under stress. in order algae under stress conditions (Hu et al. lutein. the formation of fatty acids could help consume bodies. the structure and function of lipid However. excess electrons that and glycerol moieties exchanged between the different accumulate in the photosynthetic electron transport chain lipid classes. Fatty acids can then Despite the economic importance of algae as a source of be either assembled into glycerolipids at chloroplast a wide range of lipophilic products. 1993.lipids (Alvarez and Steinbuchel. metabolism in algae. as an electron sink under photo-oxidative stress (discussed 2002). to the obvious physiological role of TAG as a carbon and 2009). 1998). therefore. In oil-producing microorganisms. Such work is also important in algae to distribution and their great abundance in many lipid- better understand the interaction among organelles as storing seeds. the chloroplast stroma is the primary location to Other Organelles for fatty acid biosynthesis in plants. The study the plastid where they are assimilated. the default pathway in some mitochondria and glyoxysomes/peroxisomes.potential pathways to convert membrane phospholipids and The TAG synthesis pathway is also often coordinated glycolipids into TAG. 2008). Under utilize phosphatidylcholine. an important aspect of membrane formation the role of oleosins (Murphy. Carotenoid-rich lipid bodies serve as a (~50%). including vitamins. 2008). their apparently widespread envelopes. and their interactions with other organelles excess electrons. Organelle Interactions and storage lipid formation warrants further study...

Besides biochemical analysis to study algal lipids 2007). for example. and (d) engineering I) or NADH from the glycolytic breakdown of stored the photosynthetic antenna pigment content for increased carbohydrate (through photosystem I). 2003).. light. As a substrate. Colorado School of Mines ) 2. 2000. 2005).. Three et al. efficiency of solar light utilization (Polle et al. In all pathways. Glycolysis ADP ATP starch pyruvate Acetyl-CoA + CO2 NAD++H+ NADH PFOR NPQR NAD++H+ FD(ox) FD (red) -1. metabolic Four biological challenges limiting biohydrogen production engineering through genetic manipulation represents in algae have been identified: (a) the O2 sensitivity of yet another strategy for the production of algal oils. and proteomic studies. fermentative H2 pathway coupled to starch production (Mathews and Wang. Algal Biology  15 . would enzymes).8 Chl 2H2O Figure 2. (b) identifying metabolic pathways that pathways have been described in green algae: two light. cDNA microarray both nickel and iron (which are generally H2-uptake analysis.. carbon partitioning and lipid/carbohydrate synthesis in algae. (Drawing courtesy of Prof. compete with hydrogenases for photosynthetic reductant. and a third. Based on such information. studies involving Expressed containing iron (which are generally H2-evolving).2 P680 Two are driven by light and the third occurs in the dark. or Sequence Tag (EST) analysis.2) (Melis et al. Gfeller the photosynthetic membrane for decreased efficiency of and Gibbs. M. Some microalgae and cyanobacteria can produce H2.→ O2 + 2H2. (c) regulatory issues associated with the over production of ATP.. driven H2-photoproduction pathways.2 P700* A0 A1 -0.8 Fx H2 Photosystem I P680* FA/FB FD H2ase Energy (Volts) -0.. a These challenges could be addressed by (a) engineering potential fuel product. and engineering their down-regulation during H2 independent. (c) engineering degradation (see Exhibit 2. Carbon is fixed under Photosynthesis normal photosynthesis with water as the donor.4 Pheo QA QB 2H+ Photosystem II 0. (b) competition for photosynthetic reductant at the level of ferredoxin. 1984).0 PQ Cyt b CO2 Cyt f 0. 2008). Either O2+2H+ water or starch can be the electron donor. and (d) inefficiencies in Biohydrogen the utilization of solar light energy (Seibert et al. Hydrogenases are the enzymes responsible for releasing molecular H2 (Ghirardi et al. hydrogenases.4 PC Chl fixation P700 0. Posewitz. those and carbohydrates. There are two major types of hydrogenases. 2009). in the following reactions: 2H2O hydrogenases with improved tolerance to O2 (Cohen + light energy → O2 + 4H+ + 4e. the light-driven pathways photosynthetic-electron-transport-coupled ATP production can either employ water (through photosystems II and (ATP is not required for H2 production). but the electron acceptor is switched at the level of ferredoxin (FD) from CO2 to protons under conditions that lead to H2 production.2 Three different pathways for H2 production 1. ferredoxin (FD) is the primary electron donor to the hydrogenase enzyme. One of the most important characteristics also help provide information about photosynthetic of hydrogenases is that they are O2 sensitive.

Efforts should be undertaken to understand the fundamental To circumvent the inhibition of hydrogenase by O2. genetic and cellular processes involved in the synthesis another option for H2 production is to take advantage and regulation of potential fuel precursors from diverse of the fermentation pathways that exist in some algae species of algae. A possibility enabled new multi-billion dollar commercial enterprises to improve the efficiency of biological H2 production for agriculture. and CO2 (van der Oost et al. For all of these with ethanol. accounting for their ability to adapt quickly of hypotheses for strain improvements. 1987). hexose) (Turner et al. Thus. the importance of being able to harness and synthetic components) and synthetic photosynthetic biotechnology approaches to generate algae with desirable systems that mimic the fuel-producing processes of properties for the production of biofuels and bioproducts photosynthetic organisms.. several cyanobacteria tools available to modify algal strains.3 Algal Biotechnology produce H2 (Tamagnini et al. In cyanobacteria. enabling technologies and analyses that can be applied which reduces ferredoxin for subsequent H2 production for biofuels and bioproducts. From here. and algae genetically remain far behind those developed hydrogenase structure and function is required. this subsection seeks to 1) address the genetic of glucose to pyruvate. (b) remove or down-regulate competing fermentative pathways thus directing more of the cellular flux toward H2 Mutagenesis production. al. and (c) learn to express multiple hydrogenases The generation and characterization of mutants is a so that electrons from both ferredoxin (Fd) and NAD(P) powerful approach to understand gene function and H can serve as electron donors to support H2 production. While many of the challenges described above The biotechnology industry grew from more than 100 exist in these organisms. for commonly used bacteria. engineered than eukaryotic algae and have more O2. Prince and Kheshgi. 16 2. 2008). using nitrogenase as the catalyst. to delete or disrupt genes. Genetic approaches are commonly also excretes typical fermentation byproducts including used to introduce genes. questions to consider in the context of mass production. hydrogen evolution pathways. In all cases. modify genes or gene expression in a particular organism.. Similarly economic viability. the limited algal to changing environmental conditions (Stal and Krumbein. fermentation is using modern analytical approaches will provide a wealth constitutive. and 3) highlights a few via nitrogenase or hydrogenase (Stal and Moezelaar. 1989). cyanobacteria Cyanothece sp. Collectively. potentially generate strains with desirable characteristics. genetic toolbox that can be used to modify process- 1987). using the carbon reserves biology of algal growth and metabolite accumulation produced during the day. human health. biological process engineering breakthroughs directly tolerant hydrogenases (Ghirardi et al. In order to fully realize the potential of H2 approaches. This temporal separation of H2 production from to date. the unicellular non-N2-fixing cyanobacterium The Genetic Toolbox Gloeocapsa alpicola can evolve H2 from the fermentation Because biological productivity is a key driver for of stored glycogen (Serebryakova et al. While a better understanding of the basic for H2 production at night. 2) describes were found to use pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Methods to cultivate and process algae in photosynthesis has been demonstrated in the unicellular commercial settings are no less important to biotechnology. the stability of the desirable trait through many production via indirect biophotolysis. 2009). For algae that undergo sexual reproduction. This is due to the production the toolbox allows traits to be recombined into a single of organic waste by-products described above along individual by mating parental strains. the hydrogenase from is a potentially important element in the research effort Cyanothece PCC 7822 produces H2 in the dark and toward algal biofuels. Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway for degradation Thus. 2005). 2008) and Oscillatoria (Stal and Krumbein. Algal Biology  . several challenges generations and the possibility of unintended horizontal must be addressed: (a) improve photosynthetic efficiency gene transfer to other organisms are important research to increase the yield of carbohydrate accumulation.Recently there has been a focus on using cyanobacteria to 2. and the production of includes developing biohybrid (those with biological chemicals. Some of these methods can also be used to study the It is well established that dark fermentation suffers from localization of gene products (mRNAs and proteins) low H2 molar yield (less than 4 moles of H2 per mol within cells. ATCC 51142 (Toepel et and these are the subjects of Chapters 3 and 4. Using hydrogenase as the catalyst. they are typically more easily years of basic biology and genetics R&D. methods to manipulate of photosynthesis. fungi and higher plants. 2002. All cyanobacteria examined thus far employ the relevant strains remains a significant technical hurdle. the ability to improve on native strains under non-N2 fixing condition. However. examples of how algal biotechnology has been applied 1997). more knowledge cannot be overlooked. and to acetate.. formate... 1998).

As long as an appropriate screening process is antibiotic use. reduced chlorophyll fluorescence (Polle et al. concern is the environmental implications of widespread Thalassiosira).. ideally in well- (GE) algae—something that could be desirable for characterized genes that can be easily complemented. other approach is limited by the low frequency of naturally methods may need to be considered for production scale. diatoms (Cyclotella. 1995). 2006). including resistance to neomycin... Chlorella. The second Volvox). Anabaena. Marker systems that take advantage of the ability to genetically complement Transformation Methods auxotrophic and metabolism mutants have also been Gene transfer systems have been established in many achieved (Kindle et al. A direct comparison of the by introducing a selectable marker randomly into two has shown that the nourseothricin system generates the genome (Adams et al. Typically.. Several in mapping the locus responsible for the phenotype. Tagging can be accomplished is inactivated enzymatically. generated by conserved ribosomal protein mutations have e. important consideration is that the use of antibiotics in Synechocystis. or through the larger numbers of transformants (Poulsen et al. 1993.. Antibiotic in DNA replication can be identified. selection marker to use includes whether the antibiotic Drawbacks of this approach include the introduction compound is sensitive to light and whether its potency is of multiple mutations in a genome and the difficulty modulated by the salinity of the growth medium. or introduction of resistance can also be an important factor. Most of the current selectable markers are derived to exhibit a characteristic phenotypic change that is easily from bacterial genes. element called a plasmid. whereas nourseothricin in gene expression.. 2. Dunaliella. including cyanobacteria (Synechococcus. this is accomplished by typically involves using control elements from a introducing an antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable highly expressed gene in that species. 1999). spontaneous mutants arising from errors with increased antibiotic-resistant microbes. large-scale production has two major drawbacks. or markers. changes in fluorescence properties. however... a modified copy of the gene that inserts elsewhere into zeocin resistance requires stoichiometric binding of the the genome. Nelson et or increased neutral lipid accumulation via Nile Red al... For example. large-scale algal production. For the latter. Dunahay et al. first concern is the cost of the antibiotic. Arthrospira). simplified identification of the mutated gene. However. The green algae (Chlamydomonas. or that the native gene may need to Given a well-developed screening approach. Debuchy et al. An algal strains. Hallmann and Rappel. occurring mutations. 1995). zeocin (Apt et al. 1989). Any mutagenesis approach requires an appropriate screening technique to enrich for and isolate mutants.. the decision as to which antibiotic standard chemical or UV-based mutagenesis approaches. The mechanism of antibiotic native gene is to be entirely replaced). 1999). this resistance is a powerful tool for research.g.. 2002). 1995). to be expressed at a higher level than the native gene (Nelson et al... and nourseothricin approaches rely on homologous recombination (if the (Poulsen et al. Targeted 1996. use of transposons (Miller and Kirk. which could exacerbate current problems developed... kanamycin (Hasnain Targeted or tagged mutagenesis offers the advantage of et al. Phaeodactylum. However. Once an appropriate antibiotic resistance or Selectable Markers complementing gene is identified. Caveats are that the mutated gene may need staining (Cooksey et al. dinoflagellates (Amphidinium. Mutants are more readily generated by For research purposes.. are examples of control elements that work across along with the DNA of interest on an extra-chromosomal evolutionarily diverse species (Dunahay et al. Certain strategies can also enable changes antibiotic by the resistance protein. 1994). 1989. Nostoc. but markers based on resistance assayed. which necessitates a large amount of screening. also been successful (Del Pozo et al. 1985. in the presence of an antibiotic). presumably because requirements for expression levels of the gene are lower and less taxing to the cells. This the DNA is present. Dunahay et al. constructs must be A powerful way to manipulate genomes is the ability to made to place the gene under control of an expression introduce DNA into the cell. 1985. 2006). For selection could be used to generate useful algal strains complementation approaches. appropriate mutations must without the need to generate genetically engineered be generated in the species of interest.g. Algal Biology  17 . iterative be replaced in order to generate the phenotypic effect. This Sophisticated metabolic engineering could require the can include either a requirement for mutants to grow under introduction of multiple selectable or complementary certain conditions (e. antibiotic markers have been developed for microalgae. 1994).. 1987) can be screening criteria. there marker (Hasnain et al. Navicula. and to select for cells in which element that functions in the species of interest. 2005).

1988. In addition. need for balance in cellular metabolism. or reduced levels of expression may transformation (Boynton et al. Gene Expression Control Elements Porphyridium. Gene replacement a selectable marker and an RNAi construct. Gracilaria. Algal strains often contain expression. 2005). 1995). Homologous recombination-based gene integration although there is a recent report of the method being approaches are common in many strains of cyanobacteria.. inducible and repressible promoters that 1993). use of single stranded DNA (Zorin et al.. then chemically based methods of transformation useful in this regard in microalgae. (Deng and Capecchi. 1993).. 1991) or silicon carbide whiskers (Dunahay. Algal Biology  .. If methods exist to remove or perforate the expression.e. sexual crossing are not well developed in microalgae... ammonium (Poulsen and Kroger. and another in which bidirectional only for a limited number of generations and must be transcription generates the double stranded RNA. With the exception of cleaving specific mRNAs or sequestering them away Chlamydomonas. RNAi operates “breed true” though a series of sexual crosses. other inducible or repressible control elements would be useful for both research and commercial applications.. and can be used to knockout genes. and so recessive genotypes or when dealing with redundant genes where traditional may not manifest unless that genotype is allowed to genetic manipulations are difficult. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Many through double-stranded RNAs that are cut down to macroalgae species are capable of sexual reproduction. transcriptional regulators) can modulate the levels Hallmann (2007) provides a comprehensive review of of mRNA. challenge to introducing DNA into a cell is the nature of allowing for precise control over the timing of gene the cell wall. brown algae Gene expression control elements (also known as (Laminaria. 2009). Dunahay. used in a red alga (Ohnuma et al. RNAi can inhibit transcription to improve commercial varieties of seaweed since the (Storz et al. selecting for functional RNAi can be problematic of microalgal cells generally integrates randomly into (Fuhrmann et al. (Kindle et al. Two general types of RNAi vectors can be constructed but this methodology could prove to be extremely – one containing an inverted repeat sequence from the important. 1995). Identification of and biolistic approaches (Matsunaga and Takeyama.. In a practical but less so in microalgae. 1998). Some diatoms can be propagated vegetatively gene to be silenced. which is useful for both nuclear and chloroplast slightly elevated. 18 2. 2005) and control translation by either 1950s (Bird and Benson. but considering the is the biolistic (“gene gun”) approach (Armaleo et al. classical genetic approaches using from the ribosome (Valencia-Sanchez et al. Control element strength can be evaluated Other successful methods include electroporation by monitoring mRNA levels by quantitative PCR or (Shimogawara et al. red algae (Cyanidioschyzon. high-throughput phenotypic screen for functional RNAi Successful recombination approaches have included the by co-targeting an amino acid synthesis pathway along addition of long flanking regions to the gene of interest with the desired gene of interest (Rohr et al. Many transformation methods also exist with nitrate in the growth medium. traits. Undaria) and euglenoids (Euglena). or co-introduction of recombinase genes with the transforming DNA (Reiss et al. The nitrate reductase promoter has proven cell wall.. 2004). vortexing with glass beads high throughput transcriptomics (i. small sizes and used to target suppression of specific and traditional mutagenesis and breeding has been used genes by base pairing. DNA introduced into the nucleus sense. Frequently. For most of these approaches. transgenes are overexpressed by A common method for introducing DNA into algal cells using strong control elements.Symbiodinium). intermediate.. 1987). and repressed with for cyanobacteria. 2001). because it is induced could be applied. 1990). including conjugation. reinhardtii. The selection process was based on a gene is present. only a small via homologous recombination is more desirable than percentage of selected transformants will have functional random integration because it can overcome phenotypic RNAi. Sexual Crossing Breeding of desired characteristics from a number of RNA Interference (RNAi) phenotypic variants can allow for strain development RNAi can be a useful tool to down-regulate gene without creating GE algae. microarrays). be desirable. One solution to this problem was developed in dominance issues when more than one copy of the C. 1992).. 2006).. 2005). electroporation. a fundamental can be actuated by simple manipulations are desirable. especially in the study of polyploid organisms multiple copies of their genome. which can then subsequently affect algae algal transgenics and implications for biotechnology. Porphyra). crossed periodically to maintain culture viability. Even on vectors containing both the genome (Dunahay et al. 1996). RNAi approaches have been investigated primarily Homologous Recombination in the model green alga.

demonstrated utility and some possible advantages It is likely that the different symbioses have affected the (Regoes and Hehl. species within classes that make abundant fuel precursors. this level of regulation integrates the annotation (the assignment of gene functions or the proteome with the metabolome. a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi). that the genomic data are only as useful as feedback.jgi-psf. Algal species are being analyzed using these analytical and several diatoms (Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Department of Energy) and for Ectocarpus siliculosus useful for applications. at least semi-quantitative evaluation of their abundance assembly of such data (especially with short read lengths) in a simple measurement. Sequenced genomes are an essential basis of information bioinformatics can represent the largest stumbling block for the interpretation of transcriptomic and proteomic to achieving that goal. Undoubtedly. for which over 20 completed these methods have revolutionized the study of organisms genome sequences are available. With the development of more powerful sequencing training should be established at the onset of activities methods. If not properly done. useful in monitoring intracellular metabolic processes associated with biofuel precursor production.S. which could impact the regulation Enabling Technologies: “Omics” and processes of fuel precursor production. approaches to better understand the underlying Thalassiosira pseudonana. Green Eukaryotic algae constitute members from at least eight fluorescent protein and its derivatives are the most major phyla. One reason for this variation is likely to be the accumulation Protein Tagging Technologies of repeated sequences in the larger genomes (Hawkins Tagging proteins with fluorescent markers is useful in et al. engineering so that they function more efficiently or have other favorable characteristics could be valuable for the development of algal biofuels technology. Volvox carteri)... 2006). so it will be important to provide sufficient consuming. even in closely related species (Connolly et al. 2004). such as genomics.. reinhardtii. a be strongly considered for any strains being developed substantial amount of regulation occurs at the protein for biofuels research or production.Centre National de Séquençage (France). will be essential Sequencing and Annotating Algal Genomes to make sequence data usable. distribution of DNA between the plastid and nucleus (Wilhelm et al. Osteococcus tauris. including allosteric activation and metabolic though. Although time families). Bioinformatics analysis of sequenced genomes. Except for cyanobacteria. applied research and technology development. pussilla.html 2. but others have and secondary endosymbioses (Falkowski et al.org/euk_cur1. Algal Biology  19 . Together.. forming the foundation for at Genoscope . 2002). Micromonas in ways and timescales that were never before possible. It must be noted level. approaches to modify proteins by genetic resources to allow for detailed analysis of the data. Genome size in algae can vary substantially.Directed Evolution of Enzymes/Proteins reduced and more coverage is obtained in a shorter period of time. Indeed. This information could be can be more challenging in repeat-laden genomes.). Fragilariopsis cylindrus). obtaining a genome sequence should Regarding core cellular metabolic processes. visit http://genome. These biological of only a handful of microalgal species have been fully advancements have been complemented by developments in or partially sequenced to date. the macroalga Porphyra purpurea at the Joint Genome Institute characterization of these cellular processes will prove (U. 2005. Bathycoccus sp. 2008). 2006). Even though new sequencing technologies determining their intracellular location and can provide readily enable accumulation of data for large genomes.. several picoeukaryotes helping biologists share and build upon experimental results (Osteococcus lucimarinus. have enabled in-depth analyses to be performed in a whole cell context. and proteomics.1 These species include computer sciences. especially at the basic level of gene annotation. the nuclear genomes both in culture and in natural habitats. with a special focus on classes or individual High throughput approaches. creating the new field of bioinformatics unicellular green algae (C. a pelagophyte (Aureococcus annophageferrens). This could 1 For a listing. in which costs have been substantially to ensure consistent and useful annotation. a where powerful new databases and search algorithms are red alga (Cyanidioschizon merolae). transcriptomics. A genomic survey of representatives from all major algal classes is Approaches and Bioinformatics desirable. Gaietta et al. all featuring a complex series of primary widely used and versatile protein tags. cellular processes and regulation involved in Genome sequencing projects are also underway for the defining the attributes of the strain. Quality standards and appropriate data.

Because the chemical that carry out similar functions can also help assign gene nature of metabolites varies more than for mRNA function and identify metabolic pathways of interest. 2004. For example. notable that while these projects represent a very useful There is a distinction between metabolomics. spontaneous considered in investigations of gene expression regulation. Aebersold. especially with regard to translational regulation. 2006). however.. different metabolomic analysis tools are applied. and some strains can fix peptides. Comparative genomics weight compounds in a cell that are involved in growth. approaches between related organisms and organisms maintenance. and Pseudochlorococcum sp. 2007) and should be applicable in cyanobacteria.. 1998). The genome of this strain functional diversity of a community of organisms. double-homologous recombination. but they are prolific carbohydrate and secondary approaches allow for robust evaluation of soluble and metabolite producers. It is and nuclear magnetic resonance (Dunn et al. identifying final fuel produced. including liquid chromatography mass Currently. Transcriptomics Lipids are a subset of the molecular repertoire of the While genome sequencing will be an important component algae cell. 2006. and ultimately determines how a cell functions Cyanobacteria generally do not accumulate storage in response to the environment. approaches (Han and Gross.include the standardization of using a particular sequencing Metabolomics and Lipidomics approach that provides sufficient coverage of ESTs to The metabolome is the collection of small molecular ensure accurate gene modeling. 2008). as well as spectrometry. which is the quantitative Therefore. not related to lipid production or other biofuels efforts. transformation. another dozen or so EST projects. These approaches not only enable protein atmospheric nitrogen and produce hydrogen. Small RNAs have been many of the tools developed for bacterial genetics are identified in microalgae (Zhao et al. at least10 other algal genomes.. are underway.. In the absence of genomic information. and metabonomics. and at least half a dozen selectable markers Proteomics are available for Synechocystis (Vermaas. Algal Biology  . Scenedesmus stimuli or genetic modification (Nicholson et al. high Quantitative comparison of lipid type and abundance are throughput sequencing technologies will also become critical components of lipid-based biofuels approaches as increasingly important because it will not only help lipid characteristics can determine the suitability of the with genome annotation (for example. response of living systems to pathophysiological such as Dunaliella sp. Moreover. the rationale for sequencing these organisms was involves the identification and analysis of metabolites. sp. proteomic Synechocystis has been used extensively for the study of approaches can also help assess the metabolic potential of carbon metabolism toward production of hydrocarbon organisms that may be difficult to isolate. and function. or can determine fuels and intermediates. in response to particular environmental conditions. Some strains can double membrane-associated proteins in the form of protein quickly (less than 10 hours). Both metabolomics and metabonomics may be important in terms of algal biofuels research. The cellular complement of proteins reflects its metabolic potential. Chlorococcum sp. high-throughput sequencing technologies enable to Algal Bioenergy comprehensive coverage of transcripts and quantification of their relative abundance. Nannochloropsis sp. Cerutti more advanced than that of eukaryotic algae because and Casas-Mollano. Monitoring lipid characteristics under a coding regions of DNA). 2007). there are still a large number of useful algal measurement of the dynamic multi-parametric metabolic species to sequence that are related to biofuels production. making them detection of post-translational modifications (Domon and attractive organisms for biofuels production.. identification. Dettmer et al. but also allow for protein quantification and many can be genetically manipulated. Mass-spectrometry lipids. quantitative transcriptome profiling using new. 1996). Castellana et al. gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Many 20 2. 2007.. Applications of Biotechnology New.. 2009). the first among photosynthetic organisms (Kaneko et al. and protein tagging are routine in some cyanobacterial systems. small RNAs also play Genetic manipulation of cyanobacteria is generally major regulatory roles in algae (Bartel. Most transcriptomics approaches Cyanobacteria evaluate mRNA levels. 2005. Tanner et al.. and proteins. was sequenced over a decade ago.. 1999). but it is also emerging as a variety of different cultivation regimes can also help inform robust approach for genome-wide expression analysis process engineering and improve yields (Yu et al. which survey. 2005).... Lipid analysis is done using mass spectrometry of any algal biofuels technology development effort.

and chloroplast (PHB). It has not been shown how these dry weight lipid (Xu et al. reinhardtii is the fact that nuclear expression of foreign genes is still problematic Despite all of the progress. 1997). 2008). It is not an abundant ethanol (Deng and Coleman. In can accumulate under salt stress (Yoo et al.. Koksharova et al. Synechococcus as a model system for understanding the fundamentals of and Anabaena strains have been studied for their hydrogen lipid synthesis and regulation. 2000). RNA silencing of carbon metabolism and regulation is not yet available (Cerutti et al. and high-throughput analytical techniques are adept at making fuel precursors and with high have been applied to the study of its transcriptome. For example. reinhardtii has been recently been (sinks) in cyanobacteria. salina is occurred during the evolution of microalgae. it will be necessary to further being developed. like the production potential (Tamagnini et al. In addition to having a sequenced nuclear genome Transgenic approaches have enabled the production and (Merchant et al. and the conditions that trigger carbohydrate protein expression systems are well developed. These currently being determined (estimated size 130 Mb).. and positional effects (Ferrante et in all cyanobacteria.html 2. The latter is a production of other carbohydrate-based storage compounds. In order to redirect carbon to a fuel al. and there are fundamental differences in (Sheehan et al. the addition of an external carbon source Xiaoling Miao et al. 2008). 2004). which occurs in the Diatoms were a major focus in the Aquatic Species Program chloroplast.. 2007). Ferrante et al. reported (Neupert et al. which increases both growth PHB accumulates under nitrogen depleting conditions rate and lipid production. Fulda et al. 2008). with specialized structure and metabolism that function some of which await elucidation and development. Relatedly. and are highly diverse that could reduce the growth of possible contaminating (Falkowski et al. 2002)... sucrose (Nobles and Brown. 2007..org/ChlNC64A_1/ChlNC64A_1. 2006. C. and stable and successful expression characterize the dominant carbon storage compounds of foreign genes in C. whereas glucosylglycerol and sucrose and some species are abundant lipid producers. which are cells is also often dependent on environmental conditions. algae with different extents of endosymbiosis (Wilhelm suggesting favorable growth rates for biomass production. 2 http://genome. 2007 ). and isobutanol (Atsumi lipid producer. 2009. is at least partly regulated by nuclear-encoded given their ability to accumulate high amounts of lipids gene products. 2006).. and metabolome (Singh et al. 2007). Synechocystis. sucrose. and polyhydroxybutyrate Chloroplast transformants are also stable. anaerobically (important for the production of hydrogen).. 2003).. 2006). 2006. For example.. 2007).. It has also been shown that induces heterotrophic growth. pathways and regulation of fuel precursor synthesis. fatty acid synthesis. protothecoides. reinhardtii can serve et al. It produces abundant Microalgae lipids (Weldy and Huesemann. 2008. glucosylglycerol.jgi-psf. but may also serve to guide the development of other types of algae for biofuels production.... 2004). 2007) and well developed transgenic secretion of cellulose. These studies can not only serve to advance examples of Chlorella transformation have been reported.. Lipid production. Diatoms are responsible for 20% the interaction between the nucleus and chloroplast in of the total global carbon fixation (Armbrust et al. 1998). The genome sequence pathways can be manipulated for the benefit of biofuels of Chlorella NC64A was recently completed. physiological conditions. it can be grown under extreme conditions over 3 billion years of evolution.photosynthesis and carbon metabolism mutants have been diversity of algae is important to identify species that generated. Continued exploration of the evolutionary A distinguishing feature of diatoms is their silica cell walls. 2009) in Synechococcus. 2008). C. strategies to address these issues are production pathway.. Multiple endosymbiotic events organisms. et al. 1999)... Algal Biology  21 .home. proteome. including glycogen.. Eisenhut et al. accumulation. but nevertheless.2 Several production. capabilities. The genome sequence of D. resulting in greater than 50% (Miyake et al. the understanding of how the production of different although the stability of the expression of the foreign carbon storage molecules are controlled in response to genes is still questionable (Leon and Fernandez. it can be sexually crossed. productivity under various environmental conditions. A possible drawback of C.. a comprehensive understanding due to codon bias (Heitzer et al. filamentous strain that can form heterocysts. it is known that glycogen accumulates under normal growth conditions in Chlorella is another well-studied genus of green algae. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is the most studied eukaryotic algae. However. and because it has outstanding salt tolerance (from 0.1 M to near Unicellular eukaryotic microalgae are the product of saturation). and events likely had significant effects on the metabolic transgenic strains have been reported (Li et al.. Dunaliella salina has several useful characteristics for large-scale biofuels production.

1997. 1995. which includes diatoms. Niwa et al.and their requirement for silicon as a nutrient for growth.. Niwa et al. Transgenic techniques characterization (Jin et al. and green seaweeds. the stipe. Roeder et al. Meneses and Santelices. tools is still imperative from a research standpoint. Understanding the basic biology that will inform with the use of molecular tools and phylogenetic such aspects as lateral gene transfer.3 None of the sequencing projects has thus far et al. represent a broad group of projects will facilitate efforts such as global genomic eukaryotic photosynthetic marine organisms. They are and proteomic profiling. Green macroalga such as Ulva (also known as sea lettuce) are classified together with common green microalgae such as Chlamydomonas and Chlorella as Chlorophyta. constructing detailed pathways evolutionarily diverse and abundant in the world’s oceans for secondary metabolite production. and metabolic and coastal waters. potential for toxin markers. anoxic zone formation.jgi. affinity with corresponding microalgal forms. and four more 1999. with different the appropriateness of deploying these strains. Modifications They are typically comprised of a blade or lamina.. This is advantageous for studying the lipid of seaweed genetics and cell function. 2005).doe. 2005). Unlike microalgae. Advances in seaweed cell and molecular biology are Silicon limitation is one trigger for lipid accumulation currently being applied toward a better understanding in diatoms.. Two diatom genome sequences are complete are used in seaweed population genetics (Alberto et al. 1995. 1994. 3 http://www. there have been several unintended releases (red algae) on the basis of their predominant pigments.gov 22 2. Ho are underway.. 1999.. Genome sequencing Macroalgae.. As such. species... Use of gene-specific probes al. Red macroalgae such as Porphyra spp. Dutcher and Kapraun. and holdfast for anchoring the entire structure to Despite the great promise of GE algae. (Armbrust et al. 1999. 2000). Zaslavskaia (Jacobsen et al. 1996. For example. 2003. Currently.. each of the major macroalgal groups has in terms of organism containment. For the species displaying variations of annual and perennial purpose of this report.. they are Considerations of Genetic multicellular and possess plant-like structural features. combinations of sexual and asexual carrying coding sequences obtained from a foreign reproductive strategies. the status of macroalgal systematics production. of GE organisms over the past 15+ years (GAO report.. For Despite the uncertainty regarding the development of example. and strain selection and been focused explicitly on biofuels. Bouza et al. even with these (brown algae). 2006) are elements have been identified (Poulsen and Kroger. 2005). are well established for several diatom species (Dunahay et 1999.. et al. and expression profiling (Collen et al.. Bowler et al. They have low lipid content as a engineering of seaweed genes to create valuable products. 2003). Since the beginning of the deployment of GE organisms. being applied to understand cell function in representatives With the development of robust gene silencing approaches of red. potential for large-scale blooms and subsequent is in a state of flux (Ali et al. because silicon metabolism is not restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and believed to be tightly coupled with the metabolism of other random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis nutrients. the gene existing genes through selection and procedures such manipulation toolkit for diatoms will be fairly complete. However. 2008). brown. and alternation of generations.. GE algae are defined as strains life histories. also have microalgal counterparts. Algal Biology  . Apt et al. general rule but are high in carbohydrates that can be converted to various fuels. there have usually been built in safeguards to prevent the release of GE organisms to avoid potential Macroalgae are historically classified as Phaeophyta disruption of ecosystems. and regulatory gene expression control 2005).. Fischer et al. there is nevertheless hard substrates in marine environments. Recombination of and possibly with homologous recombination. 2001.. The life cycles a great deal of uncertainty regarding the need for or of macroalgae are complex and diverse. Chlorophyta (green algae). Moulin et al. 2004. and choice of cultivation methods In general. Baldauf. such as the unicellular alga Porphyridium cruentum. development of genetic classified as Heterokonta within the Chromalveolata.. and Rhodophyta safeguards. 2006. as protoplast fusion will be the basis for new strain creation where outplanting of individuals for growth Macroalgae in natural environments is a goal. or seaweeds. induction response. taxonomic affinities are under re-examination 2008). the brown macroalgae such as the kelps are GE algae as production strains. are very important.

252(5). Journal of Phycology.74(9). Andersen. 245–279. E.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=51&SID=2EJn46bcIj4fjd CDlNp&page=1&doc=3. Metabolic flux analysis in plants: coping with complexity. 1991. Current genetics. Armaleo. et al.. Cell. Colombo. 55–66. The Plant Cell Online. 239-244. E. 60(4). Bartel. Biolistic nuclear transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other fungi. M.V. Molecular and General Genetics MGG. Cell & Environment. A.K. Arabolaza. R. E. mechanism.. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. W. (2009). (2006). Baldauf. H. 22(3). Progress in Lipid Research.A.. Allen. On the origin and functions of RNA-mediated silencing: from protists to man. The Genome of the diatom thalassiosira pseudonana: Ecology. and function. 295–306. R. 21034-21038. Johnston.. F. Rodriguez.. Bligh.. Apt.L. L. 1703-1706. Alvarez. Stable nuclear transformation of the diatomphaeodactylum tricornutum. S. 367-376. The deep roots of eukaryotes.G. http://apps. 911–917. Bird. D. N. C. K. et al. 2010. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Current genetics. 121(3).M. J. Shachar-Hill.E. Cerutti.. (2008). K. 456(7219). Kroth-Pancic. Science. and metabolism.B. Altabe. 240(4858). N. Multiple pathways for triacylglycerol biosynthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor. (1988). J..R. 300(5626). (32). I. storage and degradation. Castellana. Santos. Elsevier Science Ltd.P. Libourel. Discovery and revision of arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Shark. Triacylglycerols in prokaryotic microorganisms. 1355-1369. (2004). 79-86. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.B. C.E... 63(12). Bowler. J. G.. 101–108. A. 381–389. Liao. Ceron Garcia. Steinbuchel. (2005). Ahlgren. 50(2). Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Algal Biology  23 . K. et al. Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of chlamydomonas. (2006). G. 304-311. Mason.. 1534-1538. et al. 572–579. 3. (2006). 16(5). Grossman. S. (1997). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. W. Boyle. J.T. PH. C. Phylogenetic relationships among algae based on complete large-subunit rRNA sequences. 689–694. et al. The life cycle of neutral lipids: Synthesis. 83–102. H.. Alberto. 1177-1180. T.A. Atsumi. Boynton. D. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Benson.L. D. Mixotrophic production of marine microalga phaeodactylum tricornutum on various carbon sources. BMC Systems Biology. Plant. Algal Culturing Techniques. 51(3). A. K. Genetic structure of natural populations in the red algae gelidium canaariense (gelidaiales. (1996). R. Lipid analysis of freshwater microalgae: a method study. J. (1959). Amsterdam. Progress series(Halstenbek) (191). A role for lipid trafficking in chloroplast biogenesis. A. G. (2002). (2008). H. Marine ecology. 116(2). Benning. Ynalvez. (2005). (1999). 27(12). Athenstaedt.L.. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. S. Daum. Critical reviews in biotechnology. A. Seaweed Cultivation for Renewable Resources. A mutant of chlamydomonas reinhardtii that cannot acclimate to low CO2 conditions has an insertion in the Hdh1 gene. Elsevier. Armbrust. (2003). 2. Leitao.E.C. Assessing patterns of geographic dispersal of gelidium sesquipedale (rhodophyta) through RAPD differentiation of populations.A. Nature Biotechnology. 737-749. biogenesis.G. Ye. Y.C. 281–297.V.J. Moroney. (2009). Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Chloroplast transformation in chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles. (2006).. Ben Ali. P.com/full_record. et al. Higashide. (2009). evolution. (2004). Science. Bouza. Retrived January 5. Tural.Gramajo.References Adams. J. & Merino. 306(5693). (2002). Alvarez.. 47(5).C. et al. et al. H. 32(9). (1990). rhodophyta) investigated by random amplified polymorphic dna (rapd) markers. (2008). 97–103. et al. N. B. MicroRNAs genomics. Nature. (1987). 925-945. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS. Cerutti. 105(52). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2573-2582. S..isiknowledge. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology. Traditional microalgae isolation techniques.. M. J. 1241-1257. 81–99. 37(8).G. (2001). 9(6). Kawachi.M. Science. S. H.E. J Morgan. 42(2). Casas-Mollano. 17(2). (2008). Botryococcus braunii: A renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals. Functional Plant Biology. Banerjee. Klein. Sanford. Dyer.

Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. 639-642. B. (1993).. 2109-2120. (1999). Dunahay. Chisti. 42. K. (2000). 3(9). T. D. M. The EMBO Journal.. 6(9). 3365-3371. P. Chu. Purification and properties of glycogen isolated from a blue-Green Alga. Bowen. Journal of Cell Science. P. Del Pozo. 333–345. Dutcher. (2008). 696-717.. Physiologia Plantarum. Two different genes from schwanniomyces occidentalis determine ribosomal resistance to cycloheximide. Domon. 2733-2745.Chao. Fulda. 65(2). 331-338. (1989). Journal of Applied Phycology. D. Deng. et al.105(1). chemically regulated gene expression system for Chlamydomonas. 6(3). 26(1). Annual Review of Genetics. 25(3). 31(6).G. et al. Johnson. Dettmer. Kunert. Journal of Experimental Botany. 113–120.. Lelandais.E. 51-78. 523528. 148(4). S. Dahlqvist.. Journal of Phycology. nostoc muscorum.. C. P. M. Coleman. (2005). (2008). (2007). W. Photooxidative stress in plants. Deng. (2007). A. Journal of Phycology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. E. Connolly. Prometrics. T. 849–857. 433–438. An optimized. Science. The dynamics of photosynthesis. 6487-6492. (1999). Algal Biology  . Fluorometric determination of the neutral lipid content of microalgal cells using nile red. et al. Fuhrmann. K. Dunahay. Rochaix. 68(3). M. (2003).D.A. 22(2). Debuchy. Falkowski. 15(5). J. (2004). Foyer. Expression profiling of chondrus crispus (rhodophyta) after exposure to methyl jasmonate. Biotechniques. 130(5). 212-217. Proteome analysis of salt stress response in the cyanobacteriumsynechocystis sp. Science Signaling. P.E. 124–131. 463–515. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. M. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.G. S. Cooksey. rhodophyta). Hammock. Measuring the metabolome: Current analytical technologies. Fluorescent measurement of microalgal neutral lipids. 1321–1329. B. (1971). Elsey. et al. The argininosuccinate lyase gene of chlamydomonas reinhardtii: An important tool for nuclear transformation and for correlating the genetic and molecular maps of the ARG7 locus. Structure. et al.J. (2006). Phospholipid: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase: an enzyme that catalyzes the acyl-CoA-independent formation of triacylglycerol in yeast and plants. Malaysian Journal of Science. (1992). Metabolome phenotyping of inorganic carbon limitation in cells of the wild type and photorespiratory mutants of the cyanobacterium synechocystis sp strain PCC 6803. Capecchi. W. Biodiesel from microalgae. (2008). G. Genetic transformation of the diatoms cyclotella cryptica and Navicula saprophila.R. C. Y. et al. Eisenhut.D. Norazmi Mohamed. (1994). strain PCC 6803. J. Fischer. J. De la Jara. A. 267-273. et al. Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria.. Kapraun. 305(5682). The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. 294–306. R.C.R. 24 2. (1994).A. Targeting and covalent modification of cell wall and membrane proteins heterologously expressed in the diatom cylindrotheca fusiformis (Bacillariophyceae). Dunn. et al. (2008). et al.. crypthecodinium cohnii. Journal of Microbiological Methods. et al. 12(8). 1004–1011.H. C. F.J. R. 44(1). Eberhard. S. European Journal of Biochemistry.B. Jarvis. 312(5771). Journal of Microbiological Methods. J. Purton. Finazzi. J. Roessler. Bailey.. 21-27. J.A. 452. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Fatty Acid Composition of Some Malaysian Seaweeds. Ferrante.D. The abundant retinal protein of the chlamydomonas eye is not the photoreceptor for phototaxis and photophobic responses. 171. et al. 15(3). L. 13(9). (1987). Aronov. Journal of Applied Phycology. Aebersold. (2007). 3857-3863.G. Mass spectrometry reviews. PloS One. 213(2). Correlated evolution of genome size and cell volume in diatoms (bacillariophyceae). (2005). e3200. 354-360. Plant Physiology. 2803-2809. (2006). & Phang. L. Journal of Bacteriology. Journal of Phycology. Cohen. 6(6). 35(1).E. Flow cytometric determination of lipid content in a marine dinoflagellate. Collen. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) identification of genetic variation in three species of porphyra (bangiales. H. (2006). S. The Analyst. H. et al. 97(12). Finding gas diffusion pathways in proteins: Application to O2 and H2 transport in CpI [FeFe]-hydrogenase and the role of packing defects. Biotechnology Advances. 8(10). (1995). Transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardtii with silicon carbide whiskers. 114(Pt 21). M. K. et al.G. (2001). Wollman. N. Molecular and Cellular Biology. (1993). 606–625. et al.. 92(4). (2003).

17.H. 24(1). Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions. Lipids in photosynthesis: Structure. eds).. 1191- 1199.1007/978-0-387-75532-8_5.).M. K. R. Weis. II. S..J. Krause. E. Hallmann. Engineering the chloroplast genome: Techniques and capabilities for chloroplast transformation in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. (2006). S. 177-200. Harwood. E. A. F. Rappel. T. 253–264. (2007). X. Gelling agents for tissue culture of the seaweed hizikia fusiformis. 313-349.. 249-254. 503-507. E. Molecular and Cellular Biology. K.L. Gene. & Fernández. Kindle. 403(1- 2). Aasen. (1984). DNA-mediated transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardi cells: Use of aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase as a selectable marker. Østgaard. 42(1). et al. (2000). Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 54(4). Cyanobacterial cell walls: News from an unusual prokaryotic envelope. K. (2007). Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. et al. Production of ethanol from mannitol by zymobacter palmae. (1992). 99–110. (2007). 489-493. (1985). 33-41. In transgenic microalgae as green cell factories.L. 2. (2007).Gaietta.S. 53–64. Huang. 25(5). K.B. Kaneko. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. G. 109-136. Journal of Phycology. Fermentative metabolism of chlamydomonas reinhardtii: I.M. Horn. 212-218. J. 88(5). Starch and fatty acid synthesis in plastids from developing embryos of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.J. Plant journal. 296(5567). Stern. Microbiology. et al. Hydrogenases and hydrogen photoproduction in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms*.. León. (1994). (1991). Dordrecht. I. Goulard. Manavathu. analysis of fermentative products from starch in dark and light. Jacobsen. Kang. M.. achievements and problems. D. Membrane lipids in algae. Jin. Ho. 109(6). Hoiczyk. Plant Physiol. Journal of Applied Phycology. 58. Shotgun lipidomics: Multidimensional MS analysis of cellular lipidomes. M. 2(2). A. strain PCC 7942. Oil bodies and oleosins in seeds.L. The Journal of Bacteriology. Rawsthorne. Klint. et al.. The first protein map of synechococcus sp. Journal of Cell Biology. M.L. Nuclear transformation of eukaryotic microalgae: historical overview. 3647-3650. R. 75(1). Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. Hasnain.L. O. The Plant Journal. Horn. T. Hawkins. strain PCC6803. et al.C. C. (2005).. 795–805. (2002). (1995). Annual Review Plant Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Gfeller. Journal of Applied Phycology. Ethanol production from seaweed extract. N. (2000). Gibbs. 39(5). Heitzer.. 664-672. A. Algal Biology  25 . The nitrate reductase gene-switch: A system for regulated expression in transformed cells of dunaliella salina. Gross... S. 7(1). et al. Influence of codon bias on the expression of foreign genes in microalgae. Han. H. J. 132-142. 75(6).E. A.K. Retrieved December 30. Leung. Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. Plant Journal. G.W. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2589-2601. 51-57. R. S. Richards..org/10. et al.C. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. S. Hu. 182(5). Lüning.A. http://dx. Rasmussen. (1989). function and genetics (Siegenthaler. U. Li. DNA Research. Genome Research. Ghirardi. 43(1). Koksharova. 9(6). (2008). Phang. Science. 71-91. Algal transgenics and biotechnology. (1996). S. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. J. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. (2007). 1721-1725. I.doi. 81-98. Aasen. Østgaard. siliquosum (Phaeophyta) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers. 16(10). Expert Review of Proteomics. Hallmann. E. 6(6). Kindle. A. (2000). Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. 6-53. 1252-1261. (1991). 616. 5(12). et al. (1999).P. J. 888-896. K. Hansel. Molecular characterisation of sargassum polycystum and S. 1-11. et al. K. Transgenic Plant Journal. 621–639. Q. (2006). (1998). 1(1).. PA and Murata. (2003). Pang. 3(3). W. 2009. Stable nuclear transformation of chlamydomonas using the chlamydomonas gene for nitrate reductase. Circadian changes in relative abundance of two photosynthetic transcripts in the maring macroalga kappaphycus alvarezii (rhodophyta). Genetic engineering of the multicellular green alga volvox: A modified and multiplied bacterial antibiotic resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker. (1997)..H. F. Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in gossypium.

(1994). Miao. P.M. & Zhao. 1140-1150.M. 7(1).11(3). 7404-7416. Q. (2008). ‘Metabonomics’: Understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Journal of Phycology. Structure. McDermid. 513-524. Journal of Applied Phycology. Cellulose. Annual Review of Plant Biology.. (1999). 227–235. Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds. J. 127-135. Miyake. D. D. D.R.J..R. R. D. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 122(1). 218(1). 691–701. Sonnewald. 26 2. (2006). Current opinion in plant biology. Y. (2009). Journal of Applied Phycology. et al. E. J. rhodophyta). et al. Aruga. Y. M.. Phycological Research. Lung. H. Niyogi. J. 41(12). 40(5). (1999). K. S. 1073-1088. 34(17). (2003). Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. X.Libourel. (1995). 50(1). 29(11). Bock. B. Metabolic flux analysis in plants: From intelligent design to rational engineering. K. Nobles. Science. Transgenic expression of gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53582 cellulose synthase genes in the cyanobacterium synechococcus leopoliensis strain UTCC 100. 126(4). (2007). 57. I. et al. Metabolic pathway engineering for enhanced biohydrogen production. Weselake. Morphological and molecular analysis of the endangered species porphyra tenera (bangiales. Strain selection and genetic variation in gracilaria chilensis (gracilariales. Progress in lipid research. 294-304. encodes a chaperone-like protein. Wang. (2000). C. Generation of chlamydomonas strains that efficiently express nuclear transgenes. The complex network of non-cellulosic carbohydrate metabolism. N. Falkowski. 77-84. Savereide. function and biogenesis of storage lipid bodies and oleosins in plants. (2007). (1999). J. Lipids. Nelson. Confirmation of cultivated porphyra tenera (bangiales. P. D. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Genetic engineering in marine cyanobacteria. S. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annual Review of Plant Biology.. 41(2). Matsunaga.. (1994). Wu. glsA. 241-246. 4011-4019. Miller. J. rhodophyta) by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses of the plastid and nuclear DNA. (1995). Yocum. (2008). Browse. 333-359.. 649-658. 57(6). Melis. X. 296-302. Structure and function of photosystems I and II.. Kobiyama. 59. 71-77. P. et al. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. Polyhydroxybutyrate production from carbon dioxide by cyanobacteria. J. S.. 84- 86(1). K. Brown. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. (2005). 633-662. (2003). 7(7). 1237-1245. N. G. A.. 318(5848). Photoprotection revisited: Genetic and molecular approaches.. I. FEMS Microbiology Letters.. Progress in Lipid Research. Lytovchenko. Algal Biology  . Mathews.A. plants and microorganisms. Moulin. 957-970. Meneses. & Stuercke. Murphy. P. K. (2005). The CRY1 gene in chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Structure and use as a dominant selectable marker for nuclear transformation. 245- 250.G. Merchant. Fernie. 71-77. Sucrose accumulation in salt-stressed cells of agp gene deletion-mutant in cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp PCC 6803.. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. Murphy. 1181–1189. A. Sustained photobiological hydrogen gas production upon reversible inactivation of oxygen evolution in the green alga chlamydomonas reinhardtii. 10(3). Nicholson. J. Lipid biosynthesis.L Kirk. Isolation and characterization of six cDNAs involved in carbon matabloism in laminaria digitata (phaeophyceae). 991-1002. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.. Ohlrogge.P. Shachar-Hill. J. 247- 280. U.. 521-565.J. A. R. Santelices. Niwa. (2001). Miao. Humphries..A.. Holmes. Neupert.K. Nelson. 15(6). Journal of Applied Phycology. (2003). Y. Plant Physiology. Karcher. B. (1993). Lindon. rhodophyta). T. (2006). et al. Journal of Phycology. Long. 14(6). Xenobiotica.C. a volvox gene required for asymmetric division and germ cell specification. Wu. G. Kikuchi. Aruga.B. 218(1). Sucrose accumulation in salt-stressed cells of agp gene deletion-mutant in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp PCC 6803. Molecular and Cellular Biology. The Plant Cell. 45(1).. 35. 625-650. S. R.. N. (2000).J. Development. 32(3). A.G.K. 325–438. Lefebvre.L. S. The biogenesis and functions of lipid bodies in animals. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase: A key mediator of plant triacylglycerol synthesis.. 53(4). (1999). (2009). Niwa. (1999). Takeyama.S. 15(5).

107-112. 7(3). (2004). Induced beta-carotene synthesis driven by triacylglycerol deposition in the unicellular alga dunaliella bardawil. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. High-efficiency transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardtii by electroporation. Singh. et al. 273-291. L. 89–94. (1988). Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D. (2004). Tandem inverted repeat system for selection of effective transgenic RNAi strains in Chlamydomonas. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae..E. Algal culture techniques. (1996). Understanding flux in plant metabolic networks.S. 4(2). (2006). Current opinion in plant biology. Regoes. et al.G. Biology of Plants 5th ed. New York. A.. Stal. S. Benning. A.. RecA protein stimulates homologous recombination in plants. Y. S. Plant Physiology. 93(7). (2005). Worth Publishers. Eukaryotic Cell. 24. P. Watanabe. Transient gene suppression in a red alga. (2005). (1992). Truncated chlorophyll antenna size of the photosystems—a practical method to improve microalgal productivity and hydrogen production in mass culture.M. 41(6). The Ecology of Algae. 272. 122(4). Krumbein. F. The photobiological production of hydrogen: Potential efficiency and effectiveness as a renewable fuel.E. Kheshgi. et al. (2003). K. G.D. Roessler. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Y. 148(1). SNAP-tag™ mediated live cell labeling as an alternative to GFP in anaerobic organisms. Molecular genetic manipulation of the diatom thalassiosira pseudonana (bacillariophyceae). H. Journal of Phycology. 21(2). Plant Physiology. Seibert. Misumi. Wassarman. The FEBS Journal. M. N.M. Sears.. Kröger.E. Rohr. Moezelaar. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1227-1235. P.. J. (1998). L. 1193-1199... 1191-1206. FEMS Microbiology Letters. Poulton.. 76–80. (74). J. Shimogawara. Identification of stress gene transcripts in laminaria digitata (phaeophyceae) protoplast cultures by expressed sequence tag analysis. a DNA insertional transformant of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with a truncated light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size. 39(6). T. 1239-1248. 40(4). Cloning and functional characterization of a phospholipid: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase from arabidopsis. Hehl. et al. Algal Biology  27 . et al. Washington. S. Fermentation in cyanobacteria.T.E. 1821-1828. Rabbani. The Plant Cell Online. Kanakagiri. J. et al. 49–59. Bioenergy. (2005). 1059–1065. Altuvia.F.R. et al. Sheremetieva. Storz. 31(1). (2008). (2005). Roeder. Poulsen.Ohnuma. Photosynthetic water-splitting for hydrogen production. S.A. 19-31. N. et al. 242-52. Kroger.B. non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Oscillatoria sp. et al. (2009). (1998). Planta. Automated isolation techniques for microalgae. L. (2000). W.A. Stal. Evert. 611–621. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The Plant Journal.B. (2008). et al. Schwender. Ohlrogge. A reversible enzyme reaction with an important role in metabolic control. M. (2002). Genetics. 199-217. Tsygankov.J. Temporal separation of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in the filamentous.J. N. Academic Press. ASM Press. A. 217(1).. Prince. The plastidic phosphoglucomutase from Arabidopsis. 103-116. Poulsen. 3413–3423. Riekhof. 1257–1264. Reiss. 148(4). 149(1). Periappuram. Melis. Round.E. 809. An abundance of RNA regulators*. J. et al. Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during arabidopsis seed filling. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. (1998). et al... N. Fujiwara. Crosbie. V. (2005).. Journal of Phycology. K. 3094-3098..E. M. 309–317. & Kuroiwa. 27(11-12). C. Ruuska. 42(5). B. A new molecular tool for transgenic diatoms. Tanaka. A. O. (1984). Eichhorn. (2005). (2002). 135(3). Reversible hydrogenase activity of gloeocapsa alpicola in continuous culture. Archives of Microbiology. B. Protoplasma. (7). Polle. 14(6).. N. 166(1).. Serebryakova.C. A Look Back at the U. Raven.H. DC. Plant Physiology. T. (2004). A.. Annotation of genes involved in glycerolipid biosynthesis in chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Discovery of the betaine lipid synthase BTA1Cr. H. Effects of silicon deficiency on lipid composition and metabolism in the diatom cyclotella cryptica. 467-478. Stahl.. 116(4). (2004). S. N. 2. R.. K. tla1. Polle. (1998).R. J. 236(1). 1324-1335. (1997). P. Sheehan. R. Sieracki.J. J. W. 394–400. Cambridge University Press. 179–211. S. U. Chesley.S. M.. Journal of Phycology. Plant Physiology. C. Integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism with energy production is crucial to light acclimation in the cyanobacterium synechocystis. Biotechniques. Shachar-Hill. (1987).

. 293-310. J. (2006). (2007). (2005). J. Zhao. 669-681.G. 9-24. C. Journal of Bacteriology. (2005). 2195-2203.. 337(21-23). Archives of Microbiology. Zhu. Hydrogenases and hydrogen metabolism of cyanobacteria. B. J. 1190-1203.S. W. Yu. Gene modifications and mutation mapping to study the function of photosystem II. (1998). et al. A. (2007). 498-504. Accumulation of oleic acid in haematococcus pluvialis (chlorophyceae) under nitrogen starvation or high light is correlated with that of astaxanthin esters. Metabolic engineering in the -omics era: Elucidating and modulating regulatory networks.. A. (2007). (2008). Genes and development. (126). 21(10).. J.. et al. 297. Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. 513-526. Tanner. Journal of Biotechnology. Regulation of metabolic networks: Understanding metabolic complexity in the systems biology era. Prometrics. 28 2. Yoo.. 190(11). (2007). Long. 1-20. et al. Valencia-Sanchez. 36(2). 9(4). Tamagnini. (2006). & Lane. (2009). S. S. A numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. et al. Wilhelm. 1264-1277. A complex system of small RNAs in the unicellular green alga chlamydomonas reinhardtii. et al. Q. S. Characterization of cyanobacterial glycogen isolated from the wild type and from a mutant lacking of branching enzyme.. 379–386. Fermentation metabolism of the unicellular cyanobacterium Cyanothece PCC 7822. Department of Energy Journal of Undergraduate Research. 69(2). J. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. S. T. Long. 91–124. (1989). M. Zendejas. Algal Biology  . Journal of Phycology. A. T. Zehmer. 2676-2686. 325–331. 3904-3913. 21(6). M.A. Transformation of the diatom phaeodactylum tricornutum (bacillariophyceae) with a variety of selectable marker and reporter genes. (2006).H. 153–159.P.R. Miao. B. Methods in enzymology. 40(5). A role for lipid droplets in inter-membrane lipid traffic. U. 32(5). PCC6803. et al. 136(1).R. 38(2). P. Ort. Differential transcriptional analysis of the cyanobacterium cyanothece sp. 20(5). S. L. (2008). Zorin. G. Hua.N. 231-239. 515-524. Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. Renewable hydrogen production. (2004). 152(5). Simmons. Vemuri. Zhekisheva. Effects of growth condition on the structure of glycogen produced in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp. Genome Research. et al. et al. 145. Journal of Applied Phycology.A. International Journal of Energy Research. C. H. 19(2). 17(2). 66(1). Plant Physiology. (2005). (2002). 379–407.Sweetlove. Sizova. E. 157(2). P. P. Metabolic Engineering. C. (2000). F. Embryo-specific reduction of ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase leads to an inhibition of starch synthesis and a delay in oil accumulation in developing seeds of oilseed rape.G. 499-507. 202-216. Genes & development. 197-216. 4(7). deSturler. Carbohydrate Research. (2002). et al. Vigeolas.P.. Toepel. (2008). Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate. Lane. (2002). D. H. M. Spalding. Huesemann. Zhu.S. Q. Yang. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. T. 168(1). Xu. Weldy. X. (2002).. Lipid production by dunaliella salina in batch culture effects of nitrogen limitation and light intensity.A. Triacylglycerol accumulation and profiling in the model diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Baccilariophyceae) during starvation. (2007). Jane.. Aristidou. I. K. Van der Oost.F. strain ATCC 51142 during light-dark and continuous-light growth.. Nuclear-gene targeting by using single-stranded DNA avoids illegitimate DNA integration in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. M. The regulation of carbon and nutrient assimilation in diatoms is significantly different from green algae. S. 115-122. 415-419. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. Plant Physiology. et al..J. et al. Metabolic flux analysis in synechocystis using isotope distribution from C-13-labeled glucose. Shimizu. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. Gaucher. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Current Opinion in Biotechnology. Eukaryotic Cell. 4(3). Yoo. X. X. 914-921. Vermaas. Journal of Phycology. Wu. L. (2009). D.. E. W. Hegemann. et al. Protist. Turner. J. et al. Fernie. Zaslavskaia. New Phytologist.

However. both varying in where contamination and “foreign” algae are more their challenges and advantages (Exhibit 3. industry. Algal Cultivation than for open ponds raceways. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Given the multiple pathways to cultivating microalgae Traditionally. especially in terms of mixing and algal cultivation in closed (e.g. capital costs maximizing light exposure.1 compares the readily introduced. but long-term culture Broadly speaking. open gas exchange (both CO2 and O2)..1 Comparative features of microalgal cultivation approaches ADVANTAGES CHALLENGES • Less loss of water than open ponds • Scalability problems • Superior long-term culture • Require temperature maintenance as they Closed maintenance do not have evaporative cooling Photobioreactors • Higher surface to volume ratio can • May require periodic cleaning due to support higher volumetric cell biofilm formation Photoautotrophic densities • Need maximum light exposure Cultivation • Subject to daily and seasonal changes in • Evaporative cooling maintains temperature and humidity Open Ponds temperature • Inherently difficult to maintain • Lower capital costs monocultures • Need maximum light exposure • Easier to maintain optimal conditions for production and contamination prevention • Cost and availability of suitable Heterotrophic feedstocks such as lignocellulosic sugars • Opportunity to utilize inexpensive Cultivation • Competes for feedstocks with other lignocellulosic sugars for growth biofuel technologies • Achieves high biomass concentrations 3. are subject to daily and seasonal in the context of upstream and downstream processing changes in temperature and humidity. Photobioreactors to identify the best-suited cultivation system. Both types of cultivation systems must contend with require light to grow and create new biomass.1 Cultivation Pathways acknowledge the advantages and disadvantages of both photoautotrophic cultivation approaches. Photobioreactors can also provide a various features of both approaches). however. important that cultivation R&D they do not receive the benefit of evaporative cooling projects are closely associated with techno-economic and so temperature must be carefully maintained. It is. photobioreactors have suffered from and cyanobacteria. it is premature to predict whether problems of scalability. open ponds) or hybrid systems will prevail in the lose much less water than open ponds due to evaporation.3. (TE) analysis that can evaluate the cultivation system Open ponds.g. are unlikely to be sterilizable and may require periodic cleaning due to biofilm formation. it is important to 3. For photoautotrophic cultivation strategies where algae 2007). Many of these issues are being for closed photobioreactor construction are currently higher addressed through improved material usage and enhanced Exhibit 3. Though photobioreactors (e. Algal Cultivation  29 . algae can be cultivated via maintenance is likely to be superior to that in open ponds photoautotrophic or heterotrophic methods. photobioreactors).. reducing the amount of water that Photoautotrophic Cultivation must be processed and thus the cost of harvest (Christi. higher surface to volume ratio and so can support higher volumetric cell densities. therefore.

2005. 2006). or Heterotrophic Cultivation in open pond facilities. For contribution to a biofuels the micropropagation of plants is a concept that has marketplace. Macroalgae can be cultivated in off-shore.. and presented (see Chapter 10). Reddy et al. Though TE analyses for both open Tokuda. which harnesses both the overcome due to the conflicting uses of coastal zones. 2009).. then reared to plantlet size and transplanted (Bruton et al. modern prototypes for offshore potential to utilize inexpensive lignocellulosic sugars for growth of the kelp.. and culturalists to advance the vegetative propagation disease.. near-shore. photoautotrophic and heterotrophic ability of algae. 2008. 2004.. 2004. 2004. 2005). difficulties were challenges compared with photoautotrophic methods.. Turbinaria. Macroalgae 1987).. in particular. wastes from the other species of artificially produced seed as a source of propagules has represent a nutrient supply for the macroalgae. encountered with the stability of either the structures Optimal conditions for production and contamination themselves or the stability of the attachment of kelp to prevention are often easier to maintain. it remains to be seen which system protoplasts is possible in both the laboratory (Dipakkore will be preferred at scale over long periods of operation. linked turbidostats or chemostats (Benson et al.... availability of suitable feedstocks such as lignocellulosic which have viable seaweed aquaculture industries. 2005). Porphyra been in practice since the 1950s. in hybrid systems. 2007). environmental regulations from other sources. Sargassum. 3) ease of nutrient application without dilution. photobioreactors could (Dai et al. Japan. A related approach aquaculture represent challenges that will need to be is mixotrophic cultivation. Recent studies have play a critical role as breeder/feeder systems linked to shown that Porphyra. Typically. using artificially upwelled water produce a variety of products at large scale. Hypnea. they could compete for feedstocks and popular resistance against use of coastal regions for with other biofuel technologies. Dipakkore et al. Heterotrophic cultivation also achieves high successfully tested in the North Sea (Buck and Buchholz.et al. Modern integrated aquaculture scenario in co-culture with finfish macroalgal cultivation technology that is based on the use and mollusks. 2007). and Chile. Demonstrations of successful callus formation and improvements in efficiency of water movements and plantlet regeneration have been reported in commercially pond construction costs are needed (Friedlander. Dai et al. and major technological 1991). important seaweeds such as Undaria (Kawashima and 30 3.. In sugars. and there is the the structures. 2008). Because these systems rely on primary productivity the United States and Europe. Land-based pond systems have also been considered for macroalgal cultivation (Friedlander. 1993) and the phycocolloid-producing seaweeds pond and photobioreactor systems have been published or Gracilaria. In the latter. Buck. been adopted by seaweed biologists (Garcia-Reina et al. Near-shore coastal environments are already The primary challenges with this approach are the cost and being exploited by countries like China. Dai et al. Hanisak. The operation of large offshore In heterotrophic cultivation. Heterotrophic as a nutrient source. While it was determined that such cultivation presents a different set of advantages and structures would support growth of kelp. 2004.et al. already widely used to Southern California. Laminaria hyperborean.engineering designs. biomass concentrations that reduces the extent and cost of 2004. However. and predation. As a result. have been algal growth. Algal Cultivation  . located in close proximity to conversion operations Although the field is still at an early stage of development. seeds grown spp... both as free-standing algal farms and in an Macroalgae require unique cultivation strategies. 2) use of plants with or without holdfast Modern tools developed in the larger plant breeding structures. (Chynoweth. and 5) possibility of farm operations of seaweeds through cell and tissue culture techniques. 1995) or a series of al. thus providing optimism for future the infrastructure required to grow the algae (Xu. 1993. 2006) and field Additionally. over those in water have been listed as 1) ease of plant management. appears especially open raceways. Advantages of the land-based systems to coastal farms for grow-out to harvestable size. This approach takes advantage of mature on growth structures in deep waters off the coast of industrial fermentation technology. Growth of plantlets regenerated from data. providing high cell density algal inocula promising for growing plants from protoplasts (Dai et for production ponds (Ben-Amotz. for these analyses is based on assumptions or proprietary Kumar et al. 2002). much of the information used Gelidiella (Collantes et al. considerable scale-up from current activities. Saccharina latissima and Nereocystis luetkeana have in greenhouses are attached to substrates (usually rope been successfully co-cultured with salmonid fish species structures). to generate Biomass Program through several deployments of kelp new biomass. et al. Kumar et al. algae are grown without light seaweed farms was initially tested by the Marine and are fed a carbon source. such as sugars. community are now available to seaweed biologists 4) avoidance of open sea problems such as bad weather.. efforts. improvement in strain selection. 1993).

especially in open larger than all current worldwide algal culturing facilities systems.. Boutte et al. Chytrid fungi have also been known to cause The inherent difficulties of scaling up from laboratory the collapse of industrial algal cultivation ponds (Hoffman to commercial operations present both technical et al. 2008). it may become necessary to understand and manage the One possible approach to contend with this is to cultivate communities that will be present. Cheng et al.g. and the use of algal mat or biofilm cultivation must be developed on scales that are orders of magnitude schemes.2 Scale-Up Challenges species. 2009). competitors. 2005).. It should be noted that. • What prevention or treatment measures Wilson et al. Additionally. as well as potentially provide • Culture stability. Fungal of supplemental CO2 in large-scale algal cultivation and viral pathogens are common. 1994. Some members of the a mixed or natural assemblage of organisms in an attempt community will be of positive value.. “Environmental” DNA sequence analysis can contribute to the development of PCR-based • Standardized metrics for system-level (Zhu et al. and lipids still others will cause culture disruption. The cost-benefit analysis al. The methods must be sensitive.. 2008. or flow-cytometry-based taxonomic assays. Continuous monitoring will management. Brussaard.. pervasiveness of issues related to scale. there have only been 150 formal descriptions of phycoviruses. and investigation into these areas will be important for the development of large- scale cultivation risk mitigation and remediation strategies. monocultures are inherently difficult to maintain combined.. 3. and management of competitors. 2008. and pathogens. Viprey et al. viable. chemical compounds. management. and inexpensive. 2004.. but very little is known about host specificity and economic barriers to success. 2004). Tapping into existing agricultural or reservoirs of algal pathogens and predators? municipal waste streams will lower nutrient costs but could • To what extent will local “weedy” algae invade introduce unacceptable pathogens.. or and take over bioreactors and open ponds? heavy metals into the biomass stream (Hoffman et al. limited. and be necessary in open systems since seasonal variation in • Water conservation. it will be and require significant investment in methods for detection challenging to maintain algal monocultures on this scale.Other options for algal cultivation are being investigated Stability of Large-Scale Cultures including the harvesting of naturally occurring marine algal Systems for large-scale production of biofuels from algae blooms. for real-time monitoring. little is known about might limit such takeovers? artificial pond ecology or pathology.000 and several million phytoplankton 3. Nutrients. e. Rittmann et al. 2008) productivity analysis. predators. 2006. Others will compete for shared resources. must also be managed in a way that balances is the fact that algal predators and pathogens are both productivity and pathogen sensitivity with the plasticity of pervasive and little understood (Becker. commercial-scale algal cultivation: selective. 2008. including worrisome components of large-scale algae cultivation CO2. 1999. and simple and complex carbohydrates. Because of the and even less is known about host resistance mechanisms. In certain cultivation systems.. Methods for rapid. Wilson et al. Honda et algal physiological adaptation.. automated or semi-automated biological and chemical monitoring in production settings will Four broad cultivation challenges have emerged be essential for assessing the health and compositional that are important to address for economically dynamics of algal cultures. TSA- • Nutrient source scaling. 2006 ). an investment in “open source” test bed facilities for public sector Important questions concerning this threat RD&D may foster more cultivation research.. Wilson et al. such as those that to maximize total harvested biomass. sustainability and FISH (Marie et al. although current has yet to consider the intricacies of biological carbon understanding of their diversity and host range is very concentration mechanisms (Wang and Spalding... to large-scale algal cultures include: Nutrient sources and water treatment/recycling are • Are agricultural or municipal waste streams—a technically trivial and inexpensive at small scales and potentially significant source of nutrients for algal yet represent major technical and economic problems at cultivation—actually a liability because of significant commercial scales. 2009).. One of the more into a variety of useful products. and pathogens is expected (Hoffman et al. This model would can scavenge and recycle nutrients or synthesize essential require a downstream biorefinery capable of processing vitamins. Algal Cultivation  31 . and recycling. predators. 2005. proteins. (2009) point out that though there may be between 40.

and pathogens will be a key to the success of remedial actions and for determining Better methods to detect the amount of desired fuel when decontamination and subsequent restart procedures precursor produced will be required to assess the represent the only alternative. and Management 1981. 1938. Sheehan et al. Shifrin and Chisholm Sustainability. invasive species. dollars (Benemann and renewable. derivatives of the Bodipy for both wild-type and genetically modified algae. models and establish protocols for measurement of yields. For example. 2008. predator-prey relationships. 2002). 1996. molecule with higher lipophilicity or lower quantum yields whose competitiveness in the field cannot be accurately in aqueous solvent may prove to be more reliable indicators predicted. densities. and normalization. vitamins. Douskova et al. Thus. permeable. Early detection schemes for business models are already apparent on these issues. result in increases in lipid content (Azachi et al. productivity lost during down time. competitive Magnetic Resonance-based methods for rapid lipid content production strains. The synthesis of new non- genetic modifications of production strains may become toxic. There is justification to carry out such as sulfur. 32 3. as siting requirements for efficient considered. rates. cultivation schemes should lead to enhancements in productivity.Furthermore. and significant operating cost. and silicon (in the case of diatoms). 1999. phosphorous. light stress in some marine phytoplankton may also The primary focus is the major nutrients – nitrogen. sustainability. Benemann and Oswald. accounting for 6-8 cents per this area is receiving new attention from the search for gallon of algal fuel in 1987 U. 2008. physiologists. Along with standards. out (Abelson. The cost of CO2 based nutrients for heterotrophic growth will also affect the economics and sustainability of such systems. etc.. 2009) and a focus especially important issue as there have been calculations on better understanding the mechanisms of biological that the world’s supply of phosphate is in danger of running CO2 concentration from ambient air (Lapointe et al. Research at the interface between basic algal biology and chemical.. diverging dynamics will be important. For example. (Ketchum and Redfield. need to be more rigorously culture prior to water recycle. biochemists. and adapted for rapid. metabolites. New approaches are split Oswald.. and production siting. supplemental CO2 has Nitrogen. must also be R&D in both areas. molecular-level algal ecology will be an important component of the investment There is an immediate need to standardize productivity portfolio required for developing the potential of algae.. 1996). Algal Cultivation  . fluorescent indicators other than Nile Red necessary. but vary depending upon the specific strain and algal cultivation may rarely coincide with high-volume water source chosen. Gao et al. Strain selection should take nutrient requirements into account. The use and availability of carbon- point sources of CO2 (see Chapter 9). Fluorescent and Nuclear also inform efforts at developing robust. 2008). sustainable fuels. and because of the 2005. Reed et al. predators. These tools. automated. as well as others such potential need to either discard or treat the contaminated as Near Infra Red spectroscopy.. Spalding 2008). Phosphorous appears to be an (Rosenberg et al. research in multi-trophic. This calculation takes into account a 50% between using algae to scrub CO2 from emission gasses rate of nutrient recycle. Nutrient supplies for algal cultivation have a sizeable 1998). 1999). nitrogen nutrition has long been known to affect lipid accumulation in phytoplankton Nutrient Sources.S. iron. This information will productivity of potential strains. coordinated research amongst analytical System Productivity chemists. developing an understanding of pond transportation and the volatile market for carbon credits will speciation. and ecology be a major challenge for TE feasibility studies. More recent data suggest that high salt and high impact on cost. a significant investment toward basic of algal lipid contents (Gocze and Freeman. and iron additions represent a long been known to increase algal growth rate. civil and mechanical engineers is needed for cultivation science and engineering will yield significant rapid progress. The development of studied.. trace metals.. Utilization of existing and in the development of an algal biofuel industry could new knowledge related to the physiological regulation of facilitate the deployment of algal based-biofuels by lipid or carbohydrate accumulation coupled with scalable ensuring consistent. phosphorous. fit-for-purpose fuels. Requirements for additional nutrients.. inexpensive chemical treatments or physiological adaptations and high-throughput monitoring. 1994). and genetic. The frequency of contamination screening in algae have been developed and applied to events that require decontamination/restarts will be an many different types of phytoplankton with mixed results important parameter in the cost of production because of (Cooksey et al. Dynamic pond monitoring will be important are also important. Eltgroth et al. National and international efforts toward improvements in productivity while at the same time generating quality assurance policy standards early on lower the cost of production. and products. 1987. From a productivity standpoint..

The ideal form of nitrogen Another approach to reduce nutrient costs is to pursue is a function of relative costs and the specific strain’s a diligent recycle. cyanobacteria as a way to provide nitrogen biologically. to be more valuable than using the spent biomass for It is possible to consider the use of nitrogen-fixing products such as animal feed. utilizing the biofuels production is their ability to thrive in water nutrient content of municipal.000 and compatibility of wastewater resources is warranted. buildup. algae are used in some wastewater treatment facilities water management poses some of the largest issues because of their ability to provide oxygen for the bacterial for algal biofuels. and the very large required energy sustainability perspective.. and potential nitrogen and phosphorous.. Although economics dictate that the bulk of nutrient sources and recycling scenarios water derived from the harvesting step must be returned • Studies to explore the mechanisms of nutrient to the cultivation system (where remaining nutrients recycling.. which is provide some of the nitrogen and sulfur needed from a component of the diatom cell walls. Water Management. Further research into the availability day (Weissman and Tillet. However. nitrate. however. and sustainability implications of various discharge. Note also that flue gas fed to algal cultures may particularly problematic for recycling of silicon. Douskova et al. but it may also be desirable to use nutrient levels are vitally important factors for cultivation limitation (e. Because synthetic nitrogen fixation processes contains no nitrogen. The final fuel product from algal oil biology. Reagent grade sources of nutrients could make the price Conservation. a hypothetical 1 hectare (ha). A potential problem with this approach however is the impact on facility siting. Agricultural- or commodity-grade nutrients are more applicable. such as saline water from waste streams is a very attractive alternative. disposal will become a problem impact of such sources on algal biofuels production due to concerns of eutrophication of surface waters.000 gallons to fill. phosphorous. from anaerobic digestion sludges can feed subsequent algal growth). 20 metropolitan areas with high land prices and limited land cm deep open pond will require 530. availability.. it may NOx and SOx (Doucha. Currently. or silicon) as a economics. 1989). and it is not practical to transport wastewater In desert areas. the culture medium pose a problem for waste water energy. biogas. At the same time. Careful control of nutrient levels is also critical. costs are tied end up primarily in the spent algal biomass. Also. Limitation of a key nutrient will have serious impacts on biomass Nutrient sourcing and the control of nutrient productivity. these nutrients utilize fossil fuels (particularly natural gas). 2005. In the future. produced 3. water breakdown of organic materials and to sequester nitrogen can easily become a “show-stopper. Algal Cultivation  33 . brackish. This may be nitrogen.” either because of and phosphorous into biomass for water clean-up.5 cm per over long distances.g. 2009). Finding inexpensive sources of nutrients will be important. means to induce oil accumulation in the cells (Sheehan Important research areas therefore include: et al. With large cultivation systems. For example. nitrogen. or industrial unsuitable for land crops. aquifers and seawater. If this blowdown water contains substantial compatibility with cultivation sites. productivity. then most of the nutrients will remain in the such a scheme will certainly have some impact on overall digestor sludge and can be returned to the growth system productivity levels as photosynthetic energy could (Benemann and Oswald. unused nutrients in • TE and life cycle analysis to understand the cost. which is a loss of 13. Though the water used to initially fill the pond can be saline. If the biomass residues are. but One of the main advantages of using algae for their costs are still significant. nutrient recycle may prove inputs should be accounted for in life cycle analyses. or iron. for example. and Recycling of a gallon of algal fuel cost-prohibitive. or urea. evaporative losses can exceed 0. a certain amount • Geographic Information System (GIS) analyses of of “blowdown” water must be removed to prevent salt wastewater resources to understand availability.g. If not addressed adequately. tend to be near enormous. On the other hand. agricultural. Therefore. The processes through be diverted from carbon fixation to nitrogen fixation. phosphorous. for example. by preventing eutrophication. 1998). water demands will be Wastewater treatment facilities. also become necessary to expand the limits of analysis to include recycling of nutrients from animal waste. 1996).Nitrogen is typically supplied in one of three forms: ammonia. treated by anaerobic digestion to produce perhaps in co-culture with eukaryotic algae. e. and sustainability issues. gallons per day from the 1 ha pond. From a to fossil fuel prices. which these nutrients are re-mobilized and made available which may or may not be compensated for by the “free” for algal growth are not well understood. too much of a particular nutrient may prove toxic. real economic or sustainability problems or because of Utilizing agricultural run-off also poses economic benefits loss of public support due to perceived problems.

activated charcoal filtration.000 gallons per day in the 1 ha example above). accumulated salts. A critical water consumption. water. Some actively growing algal cultures can treatment. it is desirable to recycle most of that water back to the culture. but live cells could adversely is fresh water. flocculants. or may require decontamination. • Studying water recycle and methods to maximize recycle (and minimize blowdown). flocculants. Disposal of the spent water. etc. or other remediation before use. municipal wastewater. wastewater. and residual live algal cells.g.. chemical flocculants used in harvesting. including saline Conservation of water can be addressed to some extent aquifers. Furthermore. or other low. research in the following areas is warranted: in the culture and the salinity of the replacement water. toxins.water from oil wells. or biological inhibitors produced by the strains themselves could impair growth if recycled to the culture.1999). residual nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer. This can be prevented by adding Sterilization of blowdown water. heavy metals (e. and their proximity to utilizable cultivation through facility design and siting. Closed systems that spray water on the surfaces metals). This is an enormous amount of water (260. however. • Investigating ways to reduce the cost of water and location. but the amount that can managing the accumulation of salt and other inhibitors be recycled depends on the algal strain. the water being lost to evaporation practiced by the oil industry. To contain costs.. including the geology of these be balanced against the cost savings and sustainability aquifers and associations with freshwater systems analysis for water usage for a given location. Algal Cultivation  . by the Environmental Protection Agency and already quality water stream. toxins (including heavy cooling. disinfection. by disposing of a portion of the pond volume each day as “blowdown. materials in the culture. This could include reducing part of the analysis that goes into siting an algal facility evaporative cooling loads through such strategies will be to analyze the “pan evaporation” rates at specific as selecting thermotolerant strains of algae sites in conjunction with water cost and availability. makeup water/recycle. An advantage of sites that may have lower pan evaporation rates closed photobioreactors over open ponds is a reduced • Understanding the long-term effects of drawing rate of evaporation. while effectively Water recycling is essential. and other in the dissemination of genetically modified organisms. moving around such large volumes of water is very energy-intensive and can impose a significant cost. and continually making up the volume with affect biodiversity of neighboring ecosystems or result low-quality water will concentrate salts. Surface disposal and reinjection into wells may be an option as regulated 34 3. would be a fresh water—a costly and often unsustainable option—or very costly and energy-intensive proposition. • GIS analysis of water resources. could pose a serious problem.g. However. meaning that half movement (pumping costs) the culture volume must be processed daily. Note however • Analysis and definition of the regulatory landscape that evaporation plays a critical role in temperature surrounding discharge of water containing various maintenance under hot conditions through evaporative levels of salt. Incoming water (surface water. The blowdown water exiting the process will also most likely require treatment. and water double their biomass on a daily basis. and treatment (e.” The amount of blowdown required for Because of the importance of issues surrounding the use salinity control is dependent upon the acceptable salt level of water. and live cells or employ cooling towers to keep cultures cool will lose some if not possibly all of the water savings of such • Developing cultivation systems with minimal systems under these conditions (Flickinger. The added cost of such systems must down saline aquifers.) of the recycled stream could be cost-prohibitive. from flue gas). accumulated toxics. process. which could contain salts. groundwater. desalination. Treatment may be essential for water entering and exiting the process. or seawater) may be suitable as is.

The offshore-ring: A new system design for the open ocean aquaculture of macroalgae. biocatalysis and bioseparation. 16. Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO2 to biomass. 179-185. Q. R. Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology: Fermentation. J. K. Jha. Fluorometric-determination of the neutral lipid- content of microalgal cells using nile red. B. Zhang. (2004). C. 241(1-4). 355-368 Buck. M. Seedling production using enzymatically isolated thallus cells and its application in porphyra cultivation. 129(3). Dai. 331-337. Drew SW. Chisti. Q. 512. 139-145. Y. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 1-207. Xiong. James and S. Wilmotte. Hoffman. Wolfe. 56. (2002). R. in Seaweed Cultivation for Renewable Resources. Hydrobiologia. 437-440. The Journal of Applied Phycology. Guckert. (2008). X. The development of a mechanistic model to investigate the impacts of the light dynamics on algal productivity in a hydraulically integrated serial turbidostat algal reactor. G. 112. Plant Physiology. Cultivation of gracilaria and other marcoalgage in Florida for energy consumption. Aquaculture. Aflalo. Response of offshore cultivated laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the north sea. V. G. Microalgae: Biotechnology and Microbiology. 41(5). P. M. Bird. Sadka. Gocze. B. D. Candia. W. (2006). 16. H.. Israeli R & D activities in seaweed cultivation. and D. Freeman. A. (2007). 36(2).. Goldshlag.. S. K. and C. {Bibliography}Douskova. Aquaculture Engineering. 395–419. X. Melo.. J. H. Benson. Zarka. Flickinger MC. C. Zamir. Machat. 25. Final Report to US DOE NETL. (2004). Amsterdam. Han. and A. Mycological Research.. Chynoweth. and W. (2005). C. A. E. M. University of Florida. Eltgroth. Z. McLachlan and Oliveira. 17. Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs. Cytometry. Chilensis Bird.. Genetic breeding and seedling raising experiments with porphyra protoplasts. Umysova. F. Y. Gutman.. Wiley. (1991). Brussaard. Review of Biomethane from Marine Biomass. R.. J. Journal of Microbiological Methods. Shen.. 82(1). Biotechnology Advances.. Journal of Applied Phycology. B. Z. 198-211. Williams and P. J. Boutte. Aoki. C. Buck. H. 1000-1009. Rhodophyta) in laboratory culture. S. S. B. Fisher. L. S. J. Production and seeding of protoplasts of porphyra okhaensis (Bangiales. Sosa. P. (2008). 151-158. Elsevier. Hydrobiologia. A. D. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 191-218. 65-68. Livansky. (1994). A. 75(3). I.References Azachi. 111. B. Testing of primers for the study of cyanobacterial molecular diversity by DGGE. M. Actual. Y. P. 2005. Gutierrez-Wing and K. A. 1320-1329.. 6(6). V. 333-345. Collantes. P. 125-138. Yang. Cooksey. Dipakkore. (1995). and L. M. (1999). C. D. D. W. New mode of Dunaliella biotechnology: Two phase growth for beta- carotene production. L. Maeda and A. Bao. C. Liu. 294-306. Benson. Gao. 3. 65(3). and C. potential and speculative applications of seaweed cellular biotechnology-some specific comments on gelidium. Zhang.. M. Buchholz. Q. E. M. W. The Journal of Applied Phycology. Aquaculture. J. W. Journal of Microbiological Method. (2007). I. R. 15-28. 2002. Viral control of phytoplankton populations: A review. ed.. J. Ben-Amotz. Gomezpinchetti. (2005). Doucha. Wu. S. M. M. L. M. S. Buchholz. and Z. Micropropagation by explants of Gracilaria. J. Algal Cultivation  35 . (2004). Aquaculture Engineering.. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Becker. (1987). Cambridge University Press.. (2008). Gokhman and A. and B. Y. Dai. T. D. Y. K. A. Salt induction of fatty acid elongase and membrane lipid modifications in the extreme halotolerant alga Dunaliella salina. D. 127-131. and P. 51. K. Bao. R. Cambridge. (1996). R. Benemann. S. Cheng. Rusch. 674-691. Reddy. M. Balthasart and A. 250. Callis. 7. H. 221:181-194. C. 203-213. 542-550. 331-343. Journal of Applied Physiology. Garcia-Reina. (1994). J. Competition between the rotifer brachionus rotundiformis and the ciliate euplotes vannus fed on two different algae. Vitova (2009). Production and cellular localization of neutral long-chain lipids in the haptophyte algae Isochrysis galbana and Emiliania huxleyi. Novak. Yuan and Q. (2004). Isolation and characterization of a novel chytrid species (phylum Blastocladiomycota). Oswald. Grubisic. parasitic on the green alga Haermatococcus. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 17. Q. Watwood and G. Factors underlying the variability of lipid droplet fluorescence in MA-10 lydig tumor cells. L. 70-81. P. and P. Biodiesel from microalgae. (1993). Boussiba. T. Hino (2004).. T. Zhou. Zachleder and M. (1987). P. The Journal of Applied Phycology. Friedlander. Rapid quantitation of lipid in microalgae by time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance. Robledo. Hanisak. M.

Regeneration from callus of undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (laminariales. J. Algal Cultivation  .S. Xu. Ferreol and D. M. Eswaran. (2006). A. (1981). Graham and R. Callus induction and thallus regeneration from callus of phycocolloid yielding seaweeds from the Indian coast. U. (2007).nrel. Oyler. Jha. Academic Press. 43. Rao. A.: Viprey. K. (2008). 1427-1436. A. (2009). Retrieved June 29.. Spalding. Roessler. Dunahay. C. Wide genetic diversity of picoplanktonic green algae (chloroplastida) in the Mediterranean sea uncovered by a phylum-biased PCR approach. M. N.Honda. Department of Energy’s aquatic species program-Biodiesel from algae. Pre-genomic. 126. 328: 1-42. (1999)... G. 133(4). Simon and D. (2007). (2008). Schaumann and T. C. Reddy. Tokuda. (1938). Q. 10110-10115. Jha. Design and operation of an outdoor microalgae test facility. MacKenzie and D. silicate and light-Dark cycles. Rittman.. W.pdf. Hydrobiologia. S.. C. (1993). P. Anderson . 6. F. Lapointe. Neutral lipids in macroalgal spores and their role in swimming. 253-268. 2007. An external delta-carbonic anhydrase in a free-living marine dinoflagellate may circumvent diffusion-limited carbon acquisition. Weissman. 75(1). B. (1989). An inorganic carbon transport system responsible for acclimation specific to air levels of CO2 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. D. Marie and D. (2008). Rosenberg. and A. Journal of Phycology. R.. Morse. 499-507. Shifrin. Petty. and H. J. and B. and S. R. 261. Massana. D.. Dipakkore. A. K. D. R. Bot. N. 46(6). 165-169. Nature Reviews Microbiology. Benemann and P. E. J.. Journal of Biotechnology. A look back at the U.gov/docs/fy04osti/34796.. R. genomic. J. 17(4). Molecular phylogeny of labyrinthulids and thraustochytrids based on the sequencing of 18S ribosomal RNA gene. Vaulot. Krajmalnik-Brown and R. Springer-Verlag Berlin. Reed. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. M. X. Vaulot. (2008). 19. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. Vaulot. Van Etten and M. 1804-1822. Yokochi. Miao. A green light for engineered algae: Redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution. 10(7). (2006). B. D. C. 52(1). Berlin. J. Phytoplankton cell counting by flow cytometry. (2004). 596-602. T. Kumar. Redfield. Reddy. J. J.. S. Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Marine Biology. Ganesan. 147(3). 737-744. 79-92. San Diego. Marie. 430-436. Y. G. The Journal of Applied Phycology. S. Phytoplankton lipids-Interspecific differences snd effects of nitrate.. M. 637-647. (1999). (1998). and post-genomic study of microbial communities involved in bioenergy. phaeophyta). N. W. Tissue culture and regeneration of thallus from callus of gelidiella acerosa (gelidiales. Coury. Chisholm. F. Spalding. Wilkinson and M. Brzezinski. B. R. H. H. Algal Culturing Techniques. H. L. Thiruppathi.. G. 103. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19(5). and H. 385-389. Kawashima. D. M. Ketchum. Wang. Mapping of picoeucaryotes in marine ecosystems with quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene. H. T. C. Not. Nakahara. R. L. A method for maintaining a continuous supply of marine diatoms by culture. Halden. M. and Wu. from www. Higashihara. K. Environmental Microbiology. Biological Bulletin. D. (2005). S. Raghukumar. Plant Physiology. Betenbaugh. S. rhodophyta). L. 374-384. Microalgal carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanisms: Chlamydomonas inorganic carbon transporters. Nakagiri. (2005). Zhu. Kumar. 36 3. Tillet... M. R. A. Martin H. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. and D. Phycologia.. K. T. 604-612. The Phycodnaviridae: The story of how tiny giants rule the world. 15-25. Exp. L. Allen. and M. Sheehan. J. Y. CA. T. Guillou. Wilson. W.

Likewise. Kwak et al. gm water) must be concentrated to slurries containing Mollah et al. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  37 . in recycled water on culture health and stability and lipid production must be understood and controlled. Edzwald. consider the imagine selecting/designing strains to aggregate on cue energy costs and siting issues associated with harvesting or designed with a particular flocculant interaction in and dewatering. circulation. and recycling issues. Bioflocculation where algae are co- dewatering.. and extraction of fuel precursors (e. 1993.g. 1991. additives... type. lime.. 2001). This facilitates the transport of electrocoagulation must be scaled-up with cost and cells to the photoactive zone through pond or bioreactor energy analysis. however. 2005. Final will very likely depend on strain selection. electroflocculation and electrocoagulation offer with as low as 0. and Shelaf. Future research in develop specific processing technologies to support those flocculation chemistry must take into account the following: designs and a fundamental understanding of how algal biology can impact harvesting and dewatering strategies. algae harvesting (Sim et al. and on empirical of transportation. only now being recognized as critically important. and other man-made fibers are some chemical Lincoln.0. 2006. 1983). Bare et al. Flocculation is used to increase the additives that have been studied. 1988). salts. 1997).1 Approaches for Microalgae further downstream extraction and fuel conversion processes must be understood and controlled. In managed cultures. CO2 depletion for pH control has been studied (Sukenik Butterfi and Jones. energy costs climb steeply. and then air is bubbled 4. The final slurry concentration will depend on the extraction methods employed and will Optimizing flocculation methods. 1971). bioreactors. Chemical additives that bind algae or Flocculation and Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) was otherwise affect the physiochemical interaction between established for sewage treatment and later studied in algae are known to promote flocculation (Lee et al. cellulose. 2004.07% algae (~ 1 gm algae/5000 the advantages of no added chemicals (Chen. surfactants. Phochinda and White. Their small sizes. may analysis of engineering designs. Flocculation and Dissolved Air Flotation A number of different forms of forced flocculation have been employed. 1969. and small size (~1 to 30 µm). McGarry and Tongkasa. at least 1% algae given the known processing strategies (Borowitzka. Alum. 1975. Harvesting • The environmental impact of flocculant or pH Flocculation and Sedimentation manipulation in released water effluent. well-managed high growth rate cultures due to their • Bioflocculation. These energy-intensive processes are has also been considered (Lavoie and Delanoue.. Addressing these issues requires careful mind. Processes that pertain to unicellular algae are quite different from the approaches applicable • The effect of residual flocculant or pH manipulation to macroalgae.. 1998. electroflocculation. therefore. Culture manipulation techniques. Botes and Vanvuuren. some into further downstream dewatering techniques. 2003. therefore. 1984).4. water quality. make harvesting more difficult. polyacrylamide polymers. and off-shore pH with and without additives is also effective. combined with RD&D to be useful for promoting flocculation. 1977. It is possible to feasible algae-to-fuel strategy must. Knuckey et al.02 . lipids cultured with another organism that promotes sedimentation and carbohydrates). and chemistry to maximize algae recovery of dry biomass increases. 1988. 2004. and fuel Microalgae and cyanobacteria remain in suspension in conversion and use must be considered. mixtures. A determinations in particular processes. Pan et al. Manipulating suspension size of the algae aggregates. Poleman and Pauw. Flocculation leading to sedimentation occurs • Optimized sedimentation tank designs with integration naturally in many older cultures. water form of forced flocculation usually involving chemical recycling and flocculate recovery are required. • Chemical flocculant recovery techniques are required Processing technologies depend on the algal feedstocks to minimize cost and control water effluent purity. the presence of flocculant in 4. Cultures Finally. is required to promote sedimentation at harvest. being considered. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering Conversion of algae in ponds.. As the desired percentage concentrations. 1987). the mechanism slurry concentration also impacts plant location because of algae-flocculant interactions. and systems to liquid transportation fuels requires processing autoflocculation in the form of photosynthetically driven steps such as harvesting (Dodd and Anderson.. impact the required energy input. Koopman and chitosan.

. Solutions involving either solar or wind efficiency. • The filter pore size is critically important as it is defined by the size of the algae species and algae Drying aggregation rate. Moving filters Currently.through the suspension causing the algal clusters Centrifugation to float to the surface. and have the ability to remove the algae later.. The flocculant efficiency. such mechanized harvesters require boats should consider minimal or no washing requirements. Application of mechanical 38 4. 1996). however. operating costs. 2009). so leads to re-dilution of the product.g...g. • Filtration design is an important variable with both Harvesting static and dynamic filtering operations. separations and has been investigated in algal harvesting (Molina et al. Small algae pass through larger Drying is required to achieve high biomass concentrations. 2008). 2001). The algae-rich top layer is Centrifugation is widely used in industrial suspension scraped off to a slurry tank for further processing. manipulation of Filtration is conceptually simple but potentially electric fields. Centrifugation for sedimentation (e. 2002. of the roughly 1. 1995. Decreasing pore Because drying generally requires heat. the blocking of filter dryers and other oven-type dryers have been used.. the growth substrate can be easily removed. the filter. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  . methane drum size. Culture purity However. and bioharvesting. 2003). in low-humidity climates. leads to blinding. pores. acoustic focusing to concentrate algae at nodes. the Microalgae and cyanobacteria present unique filtration use of organisms growing on immobilized substrates challenges because most strains considered for energy where the amount of initial water is controlled and feedstocks have cell diameters less than 10 µm. Materials can be used that optimize filtration energy are also possible. 1991). Power costs will certainly influence derived from cultivated sources (Roesijadi et al. but will require extra space and • Filter material also influences filtration and recovery considerable time. In addition to processing of large quantities of water and algae. floc optimization. and flocculant reclamation) are also investments. where fuel precursors very expensive. approach cost-prohibitive for most of the envisioned DAF facilities require optimized integration with any large-scale algae biorefineries. energy savings must be realized before any widespread implementation of this approach can be carried out. the costs climb steeply with incremental becomes important as a distribution of microorganism temperature and/or time increases. Air-drying is possible size will affect filtration efficiency and blinding rates. but are not limited to. and high throughput encountered in flocculation and DAF. • An important step is recovering the algal biomass from which can involve mowing with rotating blades. Modern seaweed harvesting vessels can be equipped with pumps to direct harvested seaweeds directly into nets or other containment structures (Ugarte and Sharp. and mechanized harvesting methods. and can be optimized through are harvested from higher organisms (e. shrimp and further understanding of several issues: tilapia) grown with algae (Johnson and Wen. suction. recovery is largely dependent on current level of centrifugation technology makes this bubble size and distribution through the suspension. Washing the filter is one practice. water and technologies must consider large initial capital equipment algae purity. R&D have been proposed to harvest and dewater Downing et al. Significant cost and engineered design for further downstream processing. Other Harvesting Techniques and filtration without prior flocculation can be used A number of other techniques at various stages of to harvest and dewater algae (Ferguson et al. These include. or ships for operation. Filtration designs Invariably. microalgae. The efficiency is dependent on All of the issues arising from the use of flocculants the selected species (as related to size). but doing or dredging with cutters. Saidam and Butler. Durability and 4. have also been developed. design. filter materials with controlled hydrophobicity and/or algae affinity can be developed. about 90% is (Oswald. pores decreasing filter efficiency. For instance.6 million dry metric tons have been used in drum and cylinder press designs of total seaweed harvested worldwide.. Filtration Solid/liquid filtration technologies are well studied. Manual harvesting is common for both cultivated and natural systems. and reduction of filtering rates.2 Approaches for Macroalgae blinding are also issues.

Floating a high tolerance or requirement for water.harvesters in European seaweed operations have been Milling is used to reduce seaweeds to particle sizes that are described in a recent feasibility analysis for seaweeds as \more efficiently processed. a unit operations analysis of energy input debris that should be removed before further processing. new strategies should be developed to combine and integrate Preprocessing these processes in order to take an algae culture and The general preprocessing requirements for macroalgal convert it into slurry of a specific concentration. the exact ratio of water stipulated the percentages of harvestable stock allowed to to solids for marine biomass remains to be determined. significant fraction of the total amount of energy available 4..85% water content (Peterson et al. Smaller particles. The exact nature of such mechanization will obviously depend on the form Macroalgae have less of a demand for dewatering as of cultivation and type of algae being cultured. Algae that are grown in suspension The cost of harvesting and dewatering will depend on the culture. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  39 . 2001).. In forms such as Laminaria processing plants (Bruton et al. strict regulations 80 . 2009). 1989). such fermentation. Hydrothermal conversions are suited for environmental consequences of harvesting natural wet biomass and become efficient at 15 . could be cultivated in may be more important as a method to increase shelf-life floating pens. opportunities for products apart from fuels.. This has important implications for plant design to answer simple • Dewatering questions like “What percentage of the total plant energy requirements or what percentage of that made available by Seaweeds immediately following harvest can have algae must be directed toward harvesting and dewatering?”. with higher a biofuels feedstock in Ireland (Bruton et al. given the issues related to sustainability and potential environmental importance as well as current cost and achievable consequences will need to be carefully evaluated. although breakthroughs are still needed in each. adhering epifauna and other forms of Ultimately. operations. culture and end-use. litter. mechanized harvesting techniques. for a range of dry weight content based on extraction Screening for debris is considered mandatory. For part of the pretreatment process. 2004). To manage seaweed harvests. maintenance. 2009). attached forms that tend to stand upright. Although have been put in place in some countries (Pringle and some dewatering of seaweeds whose water content Tseng. The establishment of large offshore seaweeds may alleviate 4. laws have approaches 90% may be necessary. surface area to volume ratios. 2008). Dewatering seaweeds such as Sargassum spp. This will likely be a significant fraction of the will likely have less impact in procedures that can total energy cost of any algae-to-fuel process and a utilize whole seaweeds (Bruton et al. scale of harvesting and dewatering. stones. • Removal of foreign objects and debris. and hydrothermal liquefaction have either as Macrocystis. e. and low growing attached forms such as and reduce weight and associated transportation costs if Gracilaria will require different approaches compatible with algae are to be transported from sites of harvest to distant their growth characteristics. example. 2009): relevant scale and remains a significant challenge. and hydrothermal liquefaction associated biorefineries has from the outset included for bio-oils.. 2009). biomass prior to extraction or direct conversion have This has yet to be demonstrated on a commercially been categorized as follows (Bruton et al. shredded or milled macroalgal biomass can go directly into either reactions As a result of growing concern about the potential or extractions. sand. 2009). be harvested and the intervals between harvests to allow growth and recovery of biomass (Ugarte and Sharp. and depreciation. with needs is required with consideration of capital equipment the degree of screening dependent on the mode of investments. Further. cultivation in land-based pond systems will processes requiring further drying (Bruton et al. as opposed to attached to the bottom culture. In require technology appropriate for that mode of culture. influence. The concept of large off-shore macroalgae farms and fermentation for alcohols. Dewatering to grown on off-shore rings (Buck and Buchholz. and the amount of debris method. final algae concentration needed for the chosen extraction will likely have less debris.3 Systems Engineering pressure from near-shore environments and create market While specific process technologies have been studied..30% water content is noted to have a stabilizing harvesting may require retrieval and transport to shore. which is beneficial for transportation and other Similarly...20% solids or populations of seaweed near-shore. may be amenable to mowing. by washing A critical gap is the energy requirements of these processes • Milling are not only largely unknown but unbounded. anaerobic digestion and fermentation. will have higher reaction efficiency during anaerobic digestion for biogas.g. Anaerobic digestion. about 20 .

H. However. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. (2005). D.M. 113.R. 50(11). Ireland Buck. Shales. and C. 612.J. 27(10). A. C. C.C. 30 (7). 300. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.K. Green. Kim. It is possible to estimate the energy requirements in watt. (1993). (1988).S. 133. 631-635. V. 95. Preliminary Look at Energy Balance In spite of gaps in data precluding more detailed The energy content of most algae cells is of the order analyses. Increase in chlorella strains calorific values when grown in low nitrogen media. flocculation and sedimentation and the belt filter press are expected to be minimal.M. Stanley. Sustainable Energy Ireland. Robert. M. Kwon. Response of offshore cultivated laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the north sea. J. and dissolved air flotation. Transactions-American Geophysical Union. 250. Large-scale algae culture systems.F. 357-394.54 watt-hours/gram. 2000). Progress in Water Technology. 713. G. Bruton.. 9(3). Edzwald.from algae.. H. Harvesting of algae grown in agricultural wastewaters. 67. R. B. Illman. bubbles. W. (2004). (2002). Butterfi. energy example shown below provides some food for thought balance can become an issue in systems that propose regarding harvesting and dewatering technologies. D. M.A.R. Integrated high-rate pond algae harvesting system.J. Separation and Purification Technology.. Micro-Algal Biotechnology. B. Possible approaches may include developing strains of hours/gram of algae for harvesting.X. B. A quick and preliminary energy balance of vaporization of water at 0.. T. Aquaculture. & Wen. E. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. M. Dodd. Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Water Science and Technology. Zubieta. S. E. Vanvuuren.F Frampton. J. Aquacultural Engineering. de-watering.. Low cost reclamation using the advanced integrated wastewater pond systems technology and reverse osmosis. Bracco. Y. 5(4). Filtration. Logsdon. 85(3). and algae with much higher energy content than available drying as a function of the volume percentage of algae today... B. Scragg. Autoflotation harvesting of algae from high-rate pond effluents. J. along with innovative solutions to lower the in harvested biomass. Dublin. Chen. Kwak. (2009).. algal biofuel production schemes at scale will of 5 watt-hours/gram if the energy content of lipids. Algae.. D. Lyons.L. Buchholz. A review of the potential of marine algae as a source of biofuel in Ireland. Borowitzka.J. Water Supply: IWSA/IAWPRC Joint Specialized Conference on Coagulation Flocculation. I.B. 9(1). (2005). 40 4. Jones. Water Science and Technology. 231. Borowitzka. coagulants.J.. F. Jung. and proteins and the typical percentage integrated systems in order to overcome this challenge. Johnson. S. Harvesting of scenedesmus-obliquus in wastewaters-auto-flocculation or bioflocculation. (1987). Lundquist.B. Water Pollution Control Federation Research Journal.. Won. J. (2006). Downing. E. Algae removal using dissolved air flotation. to take algal biomass and concentrate / dry it to enable downstream processing and extraction because of the high volumes of water that must be evaporated away. 674-691. (27). Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 153. Ferguson. 47(1). Production of microalgal concentrations by flocculation and their assessment as aquaculture feeds. Lincoln. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. (1975).Y.B. 45(1). Jones. Water Science and Technology. Ku. Ferguson.H. Z. et al. Anderson.J. H. Oswald. (1995). Dissolved air flotation for the removal of algae and inorganic turbidity on a large-scale.B. 35(3). Removal of clay and blue-green algae particles through zeta potential and particle size distribution in the dissolved air flotation process. (1991). Lavoie. Cambridge University Press.R. T. 117. R. Lerat. A. Middlebrooks. (1969). The energy requirements for energy intensity of harvesting and drying algae. Delanoue. (2000). Curley. Knuckey. G. and M. (2010). Rasmussen. W. Agricultural Wastes. 6(1). H. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  . 11. J. (38). of each in algae are considered (Illman et al. based on the latent heat References Bare. C. N. 31(3-4). Sedimentation and Flotation. Comparison of dissolved air flotation and direct filtration. 525-534. (1977). Koopman. likely need to implement innovative technologies and carbohydrates. 852-859.J. M.. L. Botes. J.P. (1983). Brown.

Shelaf. 16(1). J. Kwon. T. Froling. 199. A. Colloids and Surfaces A-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.D. Resources. Removal of algae using froth flotation. (1971).B. 83-89. J. White. J.P.. G. Biol. Science and Technology. 1987. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Mar 42.. C. McGarry. 327. W. A.A. M. Forster. E. F. S. F. Battelle Pacific Northwest Division Report Number PNWD-3931. Tester.J. Pan. Saidam. E.Qingdao. Sim. 24(1). M.. C. Pringle.Y. (2001).and supercritical water technologies. Lachance. (2003). Y.. and Recycling. Copping. Huesemann. Roesijadi. A. dissolved air flotation and drum filtration techniques for harvesting sewage-grown algae. Benemann. 4. Sharp. Yoon. A. 185. Phoochinda. Wu. (20). Potential of electrolytic flocculation for recovery of micro- algae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 491–515. Algae removal by horizontal flow rock filters. Mollah. Butler. Becker. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  41 . China. (2004).. (2008). R.R.S. M.. 1. Sukenik. 824. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. C. Cah. Molina Grima E. Water. Environmental Technology. Kim. A new approach to seaweed management in Eastern Canada: The case of ascophyllum nodosum. H. Algal autoflocculation-verification and proposed mechanism. Tongkasa. (1996). 1. Advances in Slow Sand and Alternative Biological Filtration. W.G. Oswald. (27).. G. 1-7. B114. J. (2008).. W. (1). Goh. Water reclamation and algae harvesting.C. Robles Medina. (2003). Water Pollution Control Federation Research Journal . Acién Fernández. M. Techno-economic feasibility analysis of offshore seaweed farming for bioenergy and biobased products. R. (1988). C. P. Vogel. Oh.P. The Journal of Applied Phycology. M. Letters in Applied Microbiology. H. and J. Biomass. Dewatering characteristics of algae-containing alum sludge. (19). N. 24(5). 32-65. Comparison of centrifugation...W.J. A. (2001). Overview of a workshop on production and utilization of commercial seaweeds . G. Fundamentals. Huang. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub. Journal of Biotechnology Advances. present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation. Peterson.C. (1991). 43(5). R. Poelman. (1997).. (1998). Ugarte. (1989). 150(1-3).G. A.. Conservation.S. Y. E. K. Tseng. D. Chisti.M. Chuang. et al.Lee. 142. D. 87. (1984). 51. D. B. Antal.. G. (26). and J. 63-70. Effects of harvesting method and growth stage on the flocculation of the green alga botryococcus braunii. Energy & Environmental Science. E-H Belarbi. 14. Pauw. M.. Introduction to advanced integrated wastewater ponding systems. S.

and extraction algal biofuels as competitive bulk commodity. A shortfall of relevant information on efficient extraction bead mills (or bead-beating). Additionally. and enzyme reactions (Mata macroalgae (Aresta. 2010) and osmotic shock. extraction of lipids from microalgae (Lee et al. For this reason.5. Assuming a system that requires extraction of oils and lipids from harvested biomass—as noted. While macroalgae are more like traditional and cell walls may present formidable barriers to solvent feedstocks. 2010). pretreatment of (Zhang et al. Lipid extraction includes the following approaches: Existing extraction techniques are mainly suitable for solvent-based extraction relying on microwaves and or analytical. pulverized biomass. and autoclaving of lipids and oils at larger-scale is limiting the algal-based (Mata et al. and microwaves and suggested that microwave disruption prior to solvent The basis for lipid extraction from algal biomass is extraction is the most efficient method (Lee et al. using solvents to “milk” algal recovery/removal of high-value products.. Cell Rupture) component for extraction. largely in the realm of laboratory-scale processes that serve analytical rather than biofuel production goals. that secrete products directly into the growth medium. While considerable is a promising development (Cravotto et al.and laboratory-scale procedures. or for the sonication for cell disruption.. but these techniques often rely increase efficiencies of vegetable lipid and oil extraction on freeze dried. Lipid Extraction sonication. Recent work on extraction of lipids from three different 5. and Barberio. extraction bypass schemes that attempt to engineer algal systems techniques employed must be efficient and effective. different Algal biofuel schemes that rely on the accumulation of harvest process operations (discussed in the Chapter 4) intra-cellular lipids are the focus of this discussion. and (3) solvate the >40%. 2010). Many effective of the biomass must be disrupted prior to extraction. While many terrestrial feedstocks penetrate through the matrix enclosing the lipid material. osmotic shock. To produce cells without disrupting cellular functions. 2003). Extraction depends on identifying the particular biological Mechanical Disruption (i. 2008). shown to improve methane gas production and biosolids reduction in sludge digestion (Rittman et al. Dibenedetto. though applications outside of analytical lipid extracts and preparation for conversion to biodiesel labs are unclear. As such the development of any extraction process as single cells suspended in water at concentrations below must also account for the fact that the tissue structure 1% solids. application of organic solvents. algal biomass extraction in aqueous phase systems serves as a starting suffers from a lack of well-defined and demonstrated place for industrial-scale extraction operations. Extraction of Products from Algae   . Extraction of Products from Algae While relatively limited volumes of bioproducts are are attempting to bypass this step—the dynamics of currently produced from algal feedstocks. extraction step by either converting whole algal biomass or Different methods can be used to disrupt the cell membrane by inducing the secretion of the desired product directly. any extracting solvent must be able to (1) fuel conversion process. base.... can be removed from their environment at total solids (2) physically contact the lipid material. as well as the be successful. 2010).. 2008. For waste treatment.. Mechanical disruption can include cell homogenizers. to use elevated temperature and pressure processes that some algae-to-biofuels processes attempt to bypass the force the solvent into contact with desired biopolymers.. autoclaving. Laboratory-scale comparisons of process such as freezing. ultrasounds. Non-mechanical methods include biofuel development. prior to the application of the extraction solvents. thus a high degree of concentration may be necessary before Effective mechanical disruption can help offset the need some types of extraction can begin. extraction techniques require concentrated substrates. The use of microwaves to disrupt cells and have been carried out. 2008). This generally requires that the native structure their offshore production and harvesting. industrial-scale methods for extracting and separating of oils and lipids required for enabling biofuel production. sewage sludge with “focused pulse” sonication has been up separation challenges for extracted algal lipids.. To operations could affect extraction processes. microalgae and cyanobacteria may be cultivated lipid. 2005) et al. and acid. some systems 42 5.1 Current Practices for types of oleaginous microalgae compared bead beating.e. which is dependant on the algal species and growth status. different logistical challenges arise from access. Virot knowledge exists for the separation of plant biomass et al. little is known about the scale.

and then water) (Lewis. It was found that the when selecting a co-solvent system to extract lipids are: entire reaction could be shortened to 10 minutes if the mixture was incubated at 100˚C under a sealed cap. Similarly. (2001) found that the Bligh and Dyer method (Bligh and Dyer. thereby improving downstream separations. acetyl chloride) hydroalcoholic) that partition the extracted lipids into directly to the biomass sample and followed with heating the nonpolar hexane (Fajardo et al.g. Chloroform will extract more than just the saphonifiable methanol.. 1990). has been promoted because hexane and alcohol will It is also noteworthy that the extraction efficiency was not readily separate into two separate phases when water is improved (when water was added first). water (which is not miscible with chloroform) is marine tissue that contained more than 2% lipids but added to the co-solvent mixture until a two-phase system worked well for samples that contained less than 2% develops in which water and chloroform separate into lipids. hexane/ethanol for microalgae suggest that the water will form a solvent shell around the (Cartens et al. and Dyer co-solvent method. biomass. 2000). their results in terms of initial contact of the biomass with lipoproteins. 1990). and hexane/isopropanol for lipids. 1959). ethanol and Direct Transesterification of Lipids into isopropanol) have been suggested in place of methanol.. and methanol. less volatile and toxic alcohols (e. it was found that when (2) the ability of a second less polar co-solvent to better applying direct transesterification using an acid catalyst match the polarity of the lipids being extracted. acetyl chloride). despite the added added. The sequence of solvent addition can also affect two immiscible layers. 2005). and extract the lipids. In general. The lipids mainly separate to the extraction (Lewis et al. this approach achieved by adding both hexane and water in proportions suggested that a one-step reaction that added the alcohol that create a two phase system (hexane and an aqueous (e. In other cases.e. 1996). In these applications..Organic Co-solvent Mixtures Application of Organic Two-Solvent Systems for The concept of like dissolves like is the basis behind the Lipid Extraction from Microalgae: earliest and well-known co-solvent extraction procedure Iverson et al. 2007).. They explained lipids (i. chloroform. biomass in a modified approach to include hexane in the reaction phase in order to avoid a final purification These results suggest that the two most important criteria step (Rodriguez-Ruiz et al.. these findings suggest that membrane may be necessary. 1994).. agitation in the form of sonication or additional methanol. Extraction of Products from Algae   43 . it has been demonstrated that the extraction of lipids was significantly more efficient when solvents were added in order of increasing polarity (i.. The hexane system as chloroform to contact. the efficiency of the reaction increased when a second “less polar” solvent such as To avoid the use of elevated temperature and pressure to diethyl ether or toluene was mixed with the methanol to push the solvent into contact with the analyte (at the cost modify the polarity of the reaction medium (Carvalho and of a very high input of energy). Starting from freeze dried chloroform layer and can then be recovered for analysis. other combinations lipids and cell structure. Lepage and Roy (1984) (e. and other lipid and non-lipid contaminants) nonpolar solvents weakening the association between the (Fajardo et al. (i. the alcohol adipose tissue without prior extraction or purification for is first added as the extracting solvent.. making it more difficult for less polar solvents such microalgae (Nagle & Lemke. pure alcohol solutions of eliminate the need to use antioxidants to protect unsaturated greater carbon length (such as butanol) have not compared lipids. 1998). 1-butanol and ethanol) solvents have been tried proposed the direct transesterification of human milk and (Nagle & Lemke.e.. if not slightly better than alcohol/ Bligh and Dyer co-solvent system). Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMES) One example is the hexane/ethanol extraction co-solvent system (Grima et al. prior to their dissolution in the of co-solvents have been proposed for the extraction of monophasic system of water. at 100˚C for an hour under sealed cap would increase applications using pure alcohol (ethanol and 1-butanol) fatty acid concentrations measured (as compared to performed similarly. This method was applied to dried microalgal well against the hexane/ethanol co-solvent system. After the extraction reaction is grossly underestimated the lipid content in samples of complete. the unsaponifiable lipids such as pigments. These important results have a key impact on liquid phase 1978). (1) the ability of a more polar co-solvent to disrupt the cell membrane and thus make it sufficiently porous and Continuing efforts along this path. give relatively high hexane mixtures.e.g. lipids: hexane/isopropanol for tissue (Hara & Radin. More. solubilize. 2007).g. disruption of the cell Malcata. 5. Separation is then improved recovery of fatty acids... Consequently. methanol) and acid catalyst (e. single alcohol To increase analytical efficiency.g. In general. In general. dimethyl sulfoxide/petroleum ether for yeast extraction systems applied to “wet” biomass because they (Park et al. chloroform. but never more than 90% of the Bligh and recoveries of volatile medium chain triglycerides.. 2007). 2000)..

Extraction of Products from Algae   . ASE of higher hydrophobicity... break down the cell membrane. 2004) and lipids from microalgae (Schäfer.. to selectively to their original bioreactor for continued growth and extract polar compounds from lipid-rich samples. on dairy manure effluent (Mulbry et al. It has been proposed a technology that proposes to use solvents such as decane for the extraction of liquid extracts (Richter et al. a solid sample for both chlorophyll and β-carotene decreased as well. Hejazi et al. and time have been optimized lipids coupled with its miscibility with methanol. free fatty acids. Denery et al. separate out desirable by analogy. the cells can be returned extractable material from various processes.3000 psi) conditions for short time periods and activity tests of Dunaliella salina in the presence of (5 . and optimize the energy cost. 1996. The performance of ASE extraction was compared solvents (i. By using solvents technique on 1 . The latter is also polarity of the lipids (Herrero et al. however. If this process can be 44 5. extraction temperature. This observation is a key driving force behind the consideration of solvent extraction Selective Extraction systems at elevated temperature and pressure. must use dried Consequently. viable and active in the presence of organic solvents with a log P (octanol ) > 6 and that β-carotene can be extracted ASE is applicable to solid and semi-solid samples that more easily than chlorophyll by biocompatible solvents.55% of the fatty acids extracted by rate of mass transfer and degree of solvent access the Folch method in the first solvent extraction cycle. concentrated for the extraction of triglycerides without 1998). and production of triglycerides for biofuels production.. What remains unclear is the effectiveness of such • the elevated pressures can reduce the dielectric an approach at large scale in terms of how to handle constant of an otherwise immiscible solvent (and large amounts of biomass. Denery and coworkers optimized the extraction of carotenoids from Dunaliella salina All the preceding co-solvent systems. Conceptually. Their Accelerated Solvent Extraction observations were that solvents with lower hydrophobicity Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was first proposed reach critical concentrations more easily and in the in the mid 1990s (Richter et al. using the process. sample-solvent medium) depends upon its ability to solubilize the target ratio..10 min). 1996).30 g samples of dried biomass. 2006). Compressed gas is used to purge the different organic phases indicated that cells remained sample extract from the cell into a collection vessel. 2009). In addition to improving yields and reducing loss of cell viability and extraction of membrane-bound extraction time. the issue of solvent access to the material biomass. Accordingly. the effect of the solvent on uses organic solvents at high pressure and temperatures the membrane decreased and the extraction efficiency above their boiling point. noteworthy in the context that ASE by definition uses non-aqueous solvents and therefore. the polarity) to values that match the lipids. to all pores within the biomass matrix and.e. some have proposed a modified technique to “milk” oils or neutral lipids from algae using biocompatible solvents and applied sonication. For to fractionate lipids from biological samples (ref). is enclosed in a sample cartridge that is filled with an By applying a measurement of solvent hydrophobicity extraction fluid and used to statically extract the sample based on the partition coefficient of the solvent in a two- under elevated temperature (50 .200˚C) and pressure phase system of octanol and water.95% pressure have gained favor for two principle reasons: of the fatty acid content in the harvested microalgae • the elevated temperature and pressure increase the compared to 44 .. can be retained in the cell during the extraction phase (using a solvent front pumped through the sample at the This work has served as the basis for the development of appropriate temperature and pressure). being extracted is as important as the miscibility of the analyte in the solvent. 2004). ASE can also be applied to remove co.. it is only efficient on biomass samples to that of traditional Folch method for microalgae grown containing less than 2% w/w lipids). (2002) proposed the two-phase system of aqueous and organic phases for the selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalgae Dunaliella salina. and showed that higher or equal extraction efficiencies remain largely bench-scale methods that are difficult (compared to traditional solvent technology) could be to scale up to industrial processes due to the actual achieved with the use of less solvent and shorter extraction solvent toxicity and the low carrying capacity of the times. screening viability (500 . example. a step that also requires energy input.the effectiveness of the second co-solvent (i. and dodecane in the presence of live microalgal cells. reaction ASE is more efficient if extracting solvent. (Denery et al. In general. depending on the solvent.e.. extracted 85 . The single solvent systems at elevated temperature and ASE .

g.” was initially applied to whole biomass 2005). ethane.. however. In this system up to subcritical temperatures. ease of scale-up. Extraction of Products from Algae   45 ..1˚C and pressure of be difficult to separate from the desired lipids. creating additional energy use challenges. the ability to 5.g. for more than two decades suitable for biofuels (e. which can moderate critical temperature of 31. products miscible Largeau. but other fluids used have included ethane. 2005).applied to microalgae slurries with suspended solid extraction techniques have been used in the commercial concentrations as low as 1 wt%. However. liquid feeds (Reverchon et al. the solvent and product can be of essential oils from plant matter (Eikani et al. and saponins from oil-seeds (Güçlü-Üstündağ et case. by the same issues of energy-intensive processing and and environmental compatibility (Herrero et al. There is also the added benefit of solvent extraction of essential oils from plants (Reverchon et access into the biomass matrix that occurs at the higher al. In this 2006). 2007).. Some degradation. 2005). 2006). 73. The basic premise to subcritical water extraction the extracted product remains as a liquid or solid. higher productivity Castro et al. The majority of applications have used the extraction of lipids that cannot be transesterified. is that water. been completed and the extracted material dissolved into however.. originally termed “pressurized hot but the process can also be operated continuously (Brunner. 1994). pressure are lowered to atmospheric conditions. as the water is from microalgae (Mendes et al. CO2 because of its preferred critical properties (i. this approach significantly Supercritical Fluid Extraction reduces the capital and operating cost for an extraction Supercritical fluid extraction utilizes the enhanced solvating process. 2001) .. It can be processed using solid and compared to photosynthetic systems. water. nitrous oxide.. Supercritical fluid avoidance of expensive extraction scheme(s).e. Large-scale design scenario. Supercritical extraction is often employed in batch mode. 1999). 1999). Lipids have been selectively extracted at the high temperature and pressure become immiscible from macroalgae at temperatures of 40 . and pressure high enough to keep the liquid state (Soto and Luque de Castro..50˚C and at lower temperatures and can be easily separated. One of the more attractive points to supercritical hemicellulose as a pretreatment prior to its use as a fluid extraction is that after the extraction reaction has fermentation substrate (Mok et. the fluid returns to its original gaseous state while al. it has been applied for the selective extraction the supercritical fluid. 2006). via transesterification. 2007).. water extraction. 2006). a unique avenue for the selective extraction of lipids caffeine from coffee beans. however. thereby eliminating the need for the dewatering step. lower costs of the extracting agent.. sulfur Subcritical Water Extraction hexafluoride. 1994. easily separated downstream once the temperature and functional ingredients from microalgae (Herrero et al. 1992). triglycerides) that excludes (Brunner. as well as functional ingredients and lipids temperatures as discussed above. al. this method may provide extraction of substances from solid substrates. whether grown has the effect of converting lipids. phototrophically or heterotrophically.. The potential benefits of this approach are the power of fluids above their critical point (Luque de use of standard fermentation systems.. e. of the more important advantages described for subcritical economical production of biofuels from oleaginous water extraction include shorter extract times. is the difficulty with designing a system at Other methods for extraction and fractionation include large scale and the high-energy load required to heat the the production of oils using heterotrophic algae. and chemical inertness (Luque de Castro et al. at temperatures point can be adjusted as can the time of the extraction. scaling up the process that is developed mainly for analytical usage. just below the critical temperature. low toxicity. attractive aspects is the use of water as the solvent. 1999). higher microalgae via supercritical processing is challenged quality of extracts.379 bar (Chueng. The temperature and pressure above the critical liquefaction) is based on the use of water. as well as pigments (such as chlorophyll). Metzger and cooled back down to room temperature. In addition. under these conditions.. one of the more to biodiesel (see Chapter 6 for more detail). private companies have engineered algae that secrete oil into the fermentation media that can be recovered and later refined into a biofuel. A major constraint.9 bar). non-photosynthetic algae are grown using will also require a significant cooling system to cool sugars as energy source and using standard industrial the product down to room temperature to avoid product fermentation equipment (Barclay et al. The technique. Some pressures of 241 . Use of methanol as the solvating fluid With respect to microalgae. becomes less polar and organic compounds are more soluble than at room Supercritical fluid extraction has been applied for the temperature. as with accelerated solvent Heterotrophic Production extraction. methanol.. as well as n-butane and pentane (Herrero et Subcritical water extraction (also known as hydrothermal al. More recently. 2006)..

2004. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-chromatographic analysis of marine lipids: Insight studies. 2008. Subcritical water extraction of essential oils from coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum L. The logistics challenges faced by the nascent lignocellulosic pressure also helps to force the solvent into matrices industry. J.. 73(8). J. Lipid extraction from the microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. 5049–5059. the issue of solvent energy load. Increased of sugar-based feedstocks.. as Btu.. Improved extraction of vegetable oils under high-intensity ultrasound and/or microwaves. Mechanical disruption can large-scale heterotrophic “algal-refinery” operations. 2007. et al. Cravotto. Increasing the temperature helps to disrupt the solute- matrix interactions and to reduce the viscosity and surface tension of the water. the following in side reactions. 67(1-2). Supercritical fluids: technology and application to food processing. Very little information is available on this critical The extraction process is affected by the choice of step that is necessary before converting the algal upstream and downstream unit operations and vice biocrude into finished fuels and products. 955–959. 123-129. 1996. The presence of water can cause problems at both ends at larger scales. Cartens. 80(2). 2007. As discussed in access to the material being extracted is as important Section 4. & Abril. 2007. 1994.maintain the integrity of the fermentation catalyst and use contact between the solvent and the solute. & Malcata. Agric. G. This is a does not suggest that this is an insurmountable barrier.H. 53(13).. In this context. a preliminary look at the energy balance as the miscibility of the analyte in the solvent. At the cellular level. et al. G.M. Journal of Food Engineering. Eicosapentaenoic acid from the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. 15(5). Pressurized fluid extraction of carotenoids from Haematococcus pluvialis and Dunaliella salina and kavalactones from Piper methysticum.. However. Extraction of Products from Algae   . Chief amongst is the logistical challenge of that would normally not be contacted by solvents under securing a sustainable biomass feedstock to supply to feed atmospheric conditions. J. Separation of Desired Extracts from Solvent Stream 5. 6(2). water can either promote the formation of emulsions in the presence of ruptured cells or participate For sustainable biofuels production. principal motivation behind the application of extraction but it does serve to highlight the need for innovation techniques at elevated temperatures and pressures.R. F.P. G.. Brunner. 619–630. Balsevich.. versa. & Mazza. 120–126. Journal of Food Engineering. Fajardo. et al. thereby improving the References Barclay. Grima. Pressurized low polarity water extraction of saponins from cow cockle seed.2 Challenges Extraction processes can yield undesirable components. F. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. S. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 175–181.R. significant downsides pressure facilitates enhancing the transport of the solvent to this approach include many of the same feedstock to the analytes that have been trapped in pores. 2005. Meager. Analytica Chimica Acta. et al. M. Comparison between extraction of lipids and fatty acids from microalgal biomass.. 109(2).). 21-33. Golmohammad. 735–740. 2005. 80(2). to achieve sustainable commercial-scale systems. Güçlü-Üstündag. 71(9). intracellular benchmark can be considered: the extraction process water can prove to be a barrier between the solvent per day should consume no more than 10% of the total and the solute. 46 5. J. E. & Rowshanzamir. A. Denery. 1025–1031. Presence of Water Associated with the Biomass such as chlorophyll and non. 898-902. Carvalho. Eikani.X. et al. 501(2).transesterifiable lipids. Journal of Applied Phycology. K.. W. Journal of Food Engineering. produced per day. When present in the bulk Energy Consumption and Water Recycle solution.. Heterotrophic production of long chain omega-3 fatty acids utilizing algae and algae-like microorganisms. Lipid-Fett.3.. A. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society.. Food Chem. 1994. M. reduce the pressure and temperature requirements.

Hara, A. & Radin, N.S., 1978. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicity solvent. Analytical Biochemistry, 90(1), 420–426.
Hejazi, M.A. et al., 2002. Selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalga Dunaliella salina
with retention of viability. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 79(1), 29-36.
Herrero, M., Cifuentes, A. & Ibanez, E., 2006. Sub-and supercritical fluid extraction of functional ingredients from different
natural sources: Plants, food-by-products, algae and microalgae A review. Food chemistry, 98(1), 136–148.
Iverson, S.J., Lang, S.L. & Cooper, M.H., 2001. Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for
total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids, 36(11), 1283–1287.
Lee, J. et al., 2010. Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction
from microalgae. Bioresource Technology, 101(1), S75-S77.
Lepage, G. & Roy, C.C., 1984. Improved recovery of fatty acid through direct transesterification without
prior extraction or purification. The Journal of Lipid Research, 25(12), 1391-1396.
Lewis, T., Nichols, P.D. & McMeekin, T.A., 2000. Evaluation of extraction methods for recovery of fatty acids
from lipid-producing microheterotrophs. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43(2), 107–116.
Luque de Castro, M.D., Jimenez-Carmona, M.M. & Fernandez-Perez, V., 1999. Towards more rational techniques
for the isolation of valuable essential oils from plants. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 18(11), 708–716.
Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A. & Caetano, N.S., 2010. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other
applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 217-232.
Mendes, R. et al., 1994. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of hydrocarbons from the
microalgaBotryococcus braunii. Journal of Applied Phycology, 6(3), 289-293.
Metzger, P. & Largeau, C., 2005. Botryococcus braunii: a rich source for hydrocarbons and related
ether lipids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 66(5), 486-496.
Mulbry, W. et al., 2009. Optimization of an Oil Extraction Process for Algae from the Treatment of
Manure Effluent. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 86(9), 909–915.
Nagle, N. & Lemke, P., 1990. Production of methyl ester fuel from microalgae. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 24(1), 355–361.
Park, P.K., Kim, E.Y. & Chu, K.H., 2007. Chemical disruption of yeast cells for the isolation of
carotenoid pigments. Separation and Purification Technology, 53(2), 148–152.
Reverchon, E., Iol & Marco, A.D., 2006. Supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation of
natural matter. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 38(2), 146-166.
Richter, B.E. et al., 1996. Accelerated solvent extraction: a technique for sample preparation. Anal. Chem, 68(6), 1033–1039.
Rittmann, B.E., Krajmalnik-Brown, R. & Halden, R.U., 2008. Pre-genomic, genomic and post-
genomic study of microbial communities involved in bioenergy.
Rodriıguez-Ruiz, J. et al., 1998. Rapid simultaneous lipid extraction and transesterification
for fatty acid analyses. Biotechnology techniques, 12(9), 689–691.
Schäfer, K., 1998. Accelerated solvent extraction of lipids for determining the fatty acid
composition of biological material. Analytica Chimica Acta, 358(1), 69–77.
Soto Ayala, R. & Luque de Castro, M.D., 2001. Continuous subcritical water extraction as a useful
tool for isolation of edible essential oils. Food chemistry, 75(1), 109–113.
Virot, M. et al., 2008. Microwave-integrated extraction of total fats and oils. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1196-1197, 57-64.

5. Extraction of Products from Algae   47

6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies
Potentially viable fuels that can be produced from algae products, and this conservation law must also hold
range from gaseous compounds like hydrogen and methane, true for the algae biorefineries of the future if they
to alcohols and conventional liquid hydrocarbons, to are to achieve significant market penetration.
pyrolysis oil and coke. Attractive targets for this effort,
however, are the liquid transportation fuels of gasoline, A large number of potential pathways exist for the
diesel, and jet fuel. These fuel classes were selected as the conversion from algal biomass to fuels. These pathways can
best-value targets because 1) they are the primary products be classified into the following three general categories:
that are currently created from imported crude oil for the
bulk of the transportation sector, 2) they have the potential 1) Those that focus on the direct algal production
to be more compatible than other biomass-based fuels with of recoverable fuel molecules (e.g., ethanol,
the existing fuel-distribution infrastructure in the U.S., and hydrogen, methane, and alkanes) from
3) adequate specifications for these fuels already exist. algae without the need for extraction;

The primary objective of this chapter is to summarize a 2) Those that process whole algal biomass
number of potentially viable strategies for converting algal to yield fuel molecules; and
biomass into replacements for petroleum gasoline, diesel, 3) Those that process algal extracts (e.g., lipids,
and jet fuel. When a fuel meets all customer requirements, carbohydrates) to yield fuel molecules.
it is referred to as “fit for purpose.” While a successful These technologies are primarily based on similar
fuel-conversion strategy will address the full range of methods developed for the conversion of terrestrial
desired fit-for-purpose properties (e.g., distillation range, plant-based oils and products into biofuels, although the
ignition characteristics, energy density, etc.), these desired compositional complexities of the output streams from
fuel characteristics are driven primarily by customer algae must be dealt with before these can be applied
requirements and are discussed later in Chapter 8. This effectively. Pros and cons of these pathways within each
chapter focuses on fuel conversion strategies from a variety of these categories are discussed below, and a summary
of perspectives to establish the current state-of-the-art, of each fuel-conversion technology is given. Inputs,
as well as identify critical challenges and roadblocks. complexity, cost, and yields are provided (where known),
and key barriers and RD&D opportunities are listed.
Several emerged the Algal Roadmap Workshop in
relation to conversion of algal feedstocks to fuels. These
are noted here to help establish a reasonable framework 6.1 Direct Production of
for the most promising concepts for algal biofuels.
Biofuels from Algae
• First, the feedstock, conversion process, and
The direct production of biofuel through heterotrophic
final fuel specifications are highly interdependent
fermentation and growth from algal biomass has certain
and must be considered together if an optimal
advantages in terms of process cost because it can
process is to be identified. As a result, accurate
eliminate several process steps (e.g., oil extraction)
and detailed feedstock characterization (including
and their associated costs in the overall fuel production
both composition and variability) is essential,
process. Heterotrophic growth also allows for maintaining
since this is an upstream boundary condition for
highly controlled conditions, which first could be oriented
the entire downstream fuel-conversion process.
toward biomass production and then oil production. Such
• Second, life cycle analysis of energy and carbon will a system can generate extremely high biomass (hundreds
be a key tool in selecting the preferred fuel conversion of grams per liter) and a high percentage of that biomass
technologies from those discussed in this chapter. as lipid (well over 50%). The system is readily scaled up
• Third, the greatest challenge in algal fuel conversion is and there is an enormous potential to use various fixed
not likely to be how to convert lipids or carbohydrates carbon feedstocks (which would bring down the cost of
to fuels most efficiently, but rather how best to use production). These approaches are quite different from
the algal remnants after the lipids or other desirable the usual algal biofuel processes that use algae to produce
fuel precursors have been extracted. All of the biological oils which is subsequently extracted and used as
petroleum feedstock that enters a conventional a feedstock for liquid fuel production, typically biodiesel.
petroleum refinery must leave as marketable There are several biofuels that can be produced directly
from algae, including alcohols, alkanes, and hydrogen.

48 6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies  

Alcohols In addition to ethanol, it is possible to use algae to produce
other alcohols, such as methanol and butanol, using a
Algae, such as Chlorella vulgaris and Chlamydomonas
similar process technology, although the recovery of
perigranulata, are capable of producing ethanol and other
heavier alcohols may prove problematic and will need
alcohols through heterotrophic fermentation of starch
further R&D. The larger alcohols have energy densities
(Hon-Nami, 2006; Hirayama et al., 1998). This can be
closer to that of gasoline but are not typically produced
accomplished through the production and storage of
at the yields that are necessary for commercial viability.
starch via photosynthesis within the algae, or by feeding
sugar to the algae directly, and subsequent anaerobic
fermentation of these carbon sources to produce ethanol Alkanes
under dark conditions. If these alcohols can be extracted In addition to alcohols, alkanes may be produced directly
directly from the algal culture media, the process by heterotrophic metabolic pathways using algae. Rather
may be drastically less capital- and energy-intensive than growing algae in ponds or enclosed in plastic
than competitive algal biofuel processes. The process tubes that utilize sunlight and photosynthesis, algae can
would essentially eliminate the need to separate the be grown inside closed reactors without sunlight. The
biomass from water and extract and process the oils. algae are fed sugars, the cheap availability of which
is a key consideration for cost-effective production of
This process typically consists of closed photobioreactors biofuels; these sugars are themselves available from
utilizing sea-water with metabolically enhanced renewable feedstocks such as lignocellulosic biomass,
cyanobacteria that produce ethanol or other alcohols while in a pressure and heat-controlled environment. This
being resistant to high temperature, high salinity, and process can use different strains of algae to produce
high ethanol levels—previous barriers to commercial- different types of alkanes; some algae produce a mix of
scale volumes (Hirano et al., 1997). There have been hydrocarbons similar to light crude petroleum. These
reports of preliminary engineered systems, consisting of alkanes can theoretically be secreted and recovered
tubular photobioreactors (Hirano et al., 1997). One key directly without the need for dewatering and extraction,
aspect of the system is that a source of cheap carbon, such but more often are associated with the algae and thus must
as a power plant, is typically used to supply CO2 to the be recovered through dewatering and extraction. With
bioreactors to accelerate the algae growth. An example further processing, a wide variety of fuels can be made.
of this process technology links sugar production to The process of growing the algae heterotrophically may
algal photosynthesis. There are claims that this process present some advantages over typical photoautotrophic-
may consume more than 90% of the system’s CO2 based technologies. First, keeping the algae “in the dark”
through photosynthesis, wherein a portion of the carbon causes them to produce more alkanes than they do in the
in these sugars is converted into ethanol. The ethanol presence of sunlight. While their photosynthetic processes
is secreted into the culture media and is collected in are suppressed, other metabolic processes that convert
the headspace of the reactor, purified, and stored. sugar into alkanes can become active. Second, some have
shown the growth rate of the algae to be much higher
This technology is estimated to yield 4,000 - 6,000 gallons than traditional methods (Xu et al., 2006). This is possible
per acre per year, with potential increases up to 10,000 because instead of getting energy for growth from sunlight,
gallons per acre per year within the next 3 to 4 years the algae get concentrated energy from the sugars fed into
with significant R&D. It is theoretically estimated that the process. These higher cell concentrations reduce the
one ton of CO2 is converted into approximately 60 - 70 amount of infrastructure needed to grow the algae, and
gallons of ethanol with this technology. With such yields, enable more efficient dewatering if is actually required.
the price of captured CO2 becomes significant, and may
require a price less than or equal to $10 per ton to remain Using algae to convert cellulosic materials, such as
cost-competitive. Further breakthroughs that enable more switchgrass or wood chips, to oil may have an advantage
efficient production systems and the development of new over many other microorganisms under development
process technologies may be critical in terms of long-term for advanced biofuel production. When lignocellulosic
commercial viability. Scaling of these systems to large- biomass is pretreated to allow for enzymatic hydrolysis
scale commercial biorefineries will also require significant for production of sugars, many toxic byproducts are
advances in process engineering and systems engineering. released including acetate, furans, and lignin monomers.
Metabolic pathway engineering within these algae, enabled In most other processes, these toxic compounds can
by metabolic flux analysis and modern genomics tools, may add process costs by requiring additional conditioning
further help in producing a commercially viable organism.

6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   49

no comprehensive less than 5% of total dry weight (McDermid & Stuercke. a electrons by oxygen in algal hydrogen production. Pyrolysis is the chemical decomposition of a condensed Biological production of hydrogen (i. although the scientific literature.. to other biomass sources due to uncertainties in the Lipid content of a variety of macroalgal species is typically ability to dehydrate the feedstock. Hydrogen The production of hydrogen derived from algae has Pyrolysis received significant attention over several decades. the whole algae can be processed into fuels bio-oil from pyrolysis is not a commercial product at the instead of first extracting oils and post-processing. Macroalgae has specifically received some attention as a gasification feedstock and initial work shows that while A significant roadblock in using pyrolysis for algae some key differences exist as compared to terrestrial conversion is moisture content. where finely on economic considerations. can result in a wide range of and dark-fermentation (see Chapter 2). 50 6. Brazil. McDermid & Stuercke. and significant dehydration crops. It does not involve reactions with technologies provide a wide range of approaches to oxygen or any other reagents but can frequently take generate hydrogen. 2007). Algae may prove to be more technologies that are capable of processing whole resistant to these compounds and sugar conversion. represent the main macroalgae biochemical it would be to convert algae into a bio-oil compared feedstocks for conversion to liquid fuels (McHugh.. Several pilot plants for fast pyrolysis of biomass have been built in the In addition to the direct production of biofuels from past years in Germany. depending on the reaction parameters.steps or the concentration of biomass hydrolysate There are four major categories of conversion in the conversion step. For flash pyrolysis. higher efficiency can be achieved development of advanced photobioreactors. certain species are suitable for gasification (Ross et must be performed upstream for the process to work al. biological hydrogen production can be considered a viable 2006). social acceptance. This is one area where algae have a major advantage over other biomass sources because it exists fundamentally in small 6.2 Processing of Whole Algae units and has no fiber tissue to deal with. typical biomass throughout the country. These current time (Bridgwater.. These include the restriction of photosynthetic conversion methods. produce a suitable feedstock for generating efficiency through genetically engineered algae and/or the standard diesel fuel. and detailed side-by-side comparison was found in 2003). Liquid product yield tends to favor short residence times. It appears that pyrolysis will concentrations approaching 20% are reported in some not be cost-competitive over the short-term unless an species (Chu et al. 2008). and moderate temperatures (Huber et al. it appears fast pyrolysis to create bio-oil. and competitive drainage of fuel cannot yet be produced directly by pyrolysis of algae. too low for conversion to biodiesel. Pyrolysis has one major advantage over other technology. There are several reports on the pyrolysis of algae in the scientific literature (Demirbas. laminarin. such as mannitol.500˚C for development of a robust hydrogen infrastructure less than 2 seconds. in that it is extremely fast. Miao and Wu. including direct biophotolysis. the algae. The thermochemical treatment of indirect biophotolysis. though from algae. and supercritical processing (Exhibit 6. gasification. and the added benefit of being fuels. place in their presence. Even with the increased methods benefit from reduced costs associated with interest in converting biomass into liquid transportation the extraction process. with some hydrotreating and not only on research advances. i.. Polysaccharides. It is unclear exactly how much more difficult and fucoidin.e. 2006. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . The bio-oil has an advantage that it can enter directly The future of biological hydrogen production depends into the refinery stream and. anaerobic digestion. products. 2003). with hydrogen production by accumulation of a proton reaction times of the order of seconds to minutes. Also. and the ground feedstock is quickly heated to 350 . efficiently. and the United States. algae: pyrolysis.1). Although synthetic diesel photosynthetic activity. feedstocks must be ground into fine particles. but also by the so-called “flash pyrolysis” technology. biohydrogen) substance by heating. or other biomass. photo-fermentation. is a relatively new process (Bridgwater. degradable alternative liquid called bio-oil can be produced. improvement in hydrocracking. 2003..e. fast There are several challenges that remain before heating rates. gradient. but algae. requirement for Pyrolysis is being investigated for producing fuel from bicarbonate binding at photosystem II (PSII) for efficient biomass sources other than algae. especially amenable to processing a diverse range of algae. competitive inhibition of photosynthetic hydrogen production by CO2. 2004). 2004). 2003). at least some level of dewatering is still required.

1994).Liquid or Hydrogen Gas Hydrogen Fuels EtOH. Work also needs to be performed to understand the can be used to produce a number of products. First and foremost. 2009. 2004). 2006). FTS is also a relatively demonstrated that the bio-oil produced by pyrolysis mature technology where the syngas components (CO. making detailed molecular composition of the resulting bio-oils. and it of compounds and compositions depending on the is reasonable to expect that once water content is adjusted type of algae and upstream processing conditions for. the process more flexible. 2009). alcohol synthesis of the resulting syngas.1 Schematic of the potential conversion routes for whole algae into biofuels Algae Anaerobic Supercritical Pyrolysis Gasification Digestion Fluids SynGas Liquid or Fischer Higher Alcohol Vapor Fuel Tropsch Synthesis Catalytic Catalytic Upgrading Upgrading Transportation Liquid MeOH Biogas Fuels . there are also significant gaps in the information available about the specifications for Conversion of bio-syngas has several advantages over other converting algal bio-oil and the resulting products. address the issue of availability easily transported throughout the upgrading process. etc. Another advantage is the Additionally. H2. 2007. It may be possible to feed development of stabilizers for the viscosity of the bio-oil algae into a coal gasification plant to reduce the capital and acid neutralizing agents. Yung et al. Exhibit 6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   51 . Another research paper comparatively straightforward. the gasification of algae to these biofuels would be (Zhang et al.inexpensive dewatering or extraction process is also Gasification developed. of algae can be tailored by carefully controlling the H2O. The methods.. primarily that only incremental improvements will occur and a through Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) or mixed breakthrough in conversion efficiency appears unlikely. Unfortunately.. Balat... it is expected flexible way to produce different liquid fuels. 2007. bio-syngas is a versatile feedstock and it studied. it is possible to create a wide optimal residence time and temperature to produce different variety of fuels with acceptable and known properties. 6. Additionally. so the bio-oil may be more investment required. since pyrolysis is already a Gasification of the algal biomass may provide an extremely relatively mature process technology. algal bio-oils from different feedstocks need to be carefully Additionally. The synthesis While algal bio-oil may be similar to bio-oil from of mixed alcohols using gasification of lignocellulose is other biomass sources. Another area of interest is the thermochemical infrastructure. Srinivas et al. it may have a different range relatively mature (Phillips. research is needed on the catalytic conversion possibility to integrate an algal feedstock into an existing of the resulting algal bio-oils. and impurities) are cleaned and upgraded to usable algal growth conditions (Miao and Wu. liquid fuels through a water-gas shift and CO hydrogenation (Okabe et al. CO2.

While this technology requires sub-millimeter a net energy producer from the overall process energy sized particles. and improve the process for indirect gasification of algae. The a small size with other biomass sources and doing so algal biomass was processed by liquefaction at 300˚C. as high as 75%. Another approach for tar-free syngas was liquefaction technique was more effective for extraction demonstrated in a pilot plant in Freiberg. report it was concluded that liquefaction technique was 1993). The key roadblocks to using FTS for algae are thought Liquefaction to be similar to those for coal (Yang et al. 36 kJ g−1. 1995). These technologies harness the high synthesis catalyst and any other catalysts used in the activity of water in subcritical environments that is capable syngas cleanup process and must be removed. Tars geological processes known to be involved in the formation have high molecular weight and can develop during of petroleum-based fossil fuels realized over greatly the gasification process.. The first reactor was a low. of microalgal biodiesel than using the supercritical carbon built by Choren Industries GmbH. A solvent tar removal demonstration was (Minowa et al. more research in this area is needed through an entrained-flow gasifier where it was reacted before it can become a commercially viable option. The tars cause coking of the shortened time scales. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . temperature of 340˚C and holding time of 60 min had a viscosity of 150 . 2005). (Raffelt et al. Typically. algae may have a unique advantage balance. 1995). Liquefaction of Dunaliella tertiolecta built in Finland in a joint venture of the Technical with a moisture content of 78. The oil obtained at a reaction installed in a plant in Moissannes. There are reports subsequent thermal tar cracker (Goudriaan et al. 2006). it is necessary to determine the optimum conditions 52 6. Also. Even though FTS is a mature technology. with the exception of any upstream process steps that may be Direct hydrothermal liquefaction in subcritical water a source of contaminants which will need to be removed (defined as water held in a liquid state above 100oC by prior to reaching the FT catalyst.for dedicated biomass plants. France in 2006. Liquefaction of algae is two successive reactors. it should be possible to use by algae for use in the gasifier to reduce or eliminate the some of the heat for drying the algae during a harvesting/ need for a tar reformer... the most significant problem al. of the feedstock on a • Fluidized-bed gasification and solvent tar removal dry ash free basis and has energy content that is comparable • Fluidized-bed gasification and to diesel and can be upgraded further. 2005). algae may not require pretreatment due to their inherent There have also been comparative studies that report the small size. considered a promising technological approach but due temperature gasifier that broke down the biomass into to limited information in hydrothermal liquefaction volatiles and solid char. and yield of about 37% (organic basis) at 300˚C and 10 MPa Stora Enso. Neste Oil. However. Prior work in direct liquefaction of biomass was very A demonstration plant for gasification of wood chips active. ongoing syngas-to-ethanol research using cellulosic. The main product of this liquefaction process is a “bio-crude” • Fluidized-bed gasification and catalytic reforming that typically accounts for 45% wt. FTS tends to require applying pressure) is a technology that can be employed to production at a very large scale to make the process convert wet algal biomass to a range of liquid fuels (Patil et efficient overall. • Entrained-flow gasification at high temperature defined as the ratio of heating values of bio-crude products and feedstock plus external heat input. First..4 wt% produced an oil Research Centre of Finland (VTT).. but certain species of catalyzed by sodium carbonate (Sawayama et al... comparable to those of fuel oil. there are still several areas that should be investigated and require R&D. A maximum oil yield of 64% using Botryococcus in this process. In the same flow gasification at high temperatures (Hallgren et al. The pilot plant used dioxide (Aresta et al. The four of decomposing the algal biomass into smaller molecules basic mechanisms to deal with tar-related problems are: of higher energy density or more valuable chemicals. The tar-rich gas was then passed of algae to date. with oxygen at high temperature. since determine the feasibility of using the oxygen generated FTS is an exothermic process. 2000) that claim the thermal efficiency. 2008). It would be desirable to efficiency through economy of scale. usually requires pretreatment. it is difficult to reach such braunii as a feedstock has also been reported..330 mPas and a calorific value of Tar formation can be minimized or avoided via entrained. it would be useful to leverage dewatering process with a regenerative heat exchanger. Germany. Additionally. and there are a few reports that used algal biomass with catalytic cracking of the tar is currently being as a feedstock. This technology is a representation of the natural with FTS is the cost of clean-up and tar reforming.

. Similar results have been Fernández et al. and as such. e. Additionally. 2008).. the decomposition of fatty acids is the main stage anaerobic digestion process with different strains factor that limited the attainable ester content (Vieitez et of algae. The supercritical extraction process can be coupled with a transesterification reaction scheme to enable a “one Anaerobic Digestion of Whole Algae pot” approach to biofuel production (Anitescu et al. transesterification. it may be very effective oils (Hawash et al. Because decomposition was for situations like integrated wastewater treatment. 2007). The use of or ethanol is employed as both the oil extraction medium this conversion technology eliminates several of the and the catalyst for transesterification (Warabi et al. in terms of yield. supercritical tolerate the complex compositions that are found with fluids can be used on whole algae without dewatering. In this process variant. could become cost-competitive with fossil fuels. This supercritical transesterification approach can also be applied for algal oil extracts. 2008). gal vs. and fuel conversion. If this approach can be modified observed for supercritical methanol processing of vegetable for the use of microalgae. a consequence of temperature and pressure conditions where algae are grown under uncontrolled conditions used in this study. In for example. is to demonstrate are selective. with similar yields and efficiencies at a Extraction is efficient at modest operating temperatures. 2009). and one that receives scant attention of algae. it must be demonstrated that this process can product stability and quality..51/gal).g. conversion of vegetable oils. 2009). have been types of inputs to the conversion technologies must be shown to be very favorable for large-scale deployment. and this be mitigated through the addition of a transesterification technique has been demonstrated to be extremely powerful conversion process. There is to the transesterification of the algal oil extracts. The most common type of algal extracts under One economic analysis has been conducted based on a consideration are lipid-based. in particular. ensuring maximum particular. impact due to the presence of other small metabolites. with a conversion cost-effective methodology. Although it has been only demonstrated for the of macroalgae. Vieitez et al. is an interesting mode of gaseous oils. key obstacles that are responsible for the current high 2004). It was found that the processing cost of the proposed Supercritical processing is a recent addition to the portfolio supercritical technology could be near half of that of the of techniques capable of simultaneously extracting actual conventional transesterification methods (i. It is. It also remains to be seen whether the processing of whole algae in this The conversion of extracts derived from algal sources is fashion is superior.. supercritical methanol in the United States (Hanssen et al. further work should be focused on the using strains not optimized for lipid production. the typical mode of biofuel production from algae. While the occurrence of A recent study indicated that biogas production levels water in the reaction medium appears as a factor in process of 180. oil extract. therefore. The production of biogas from the anaerobic digestion 2008). $0. it has been demonstrated that this extraction. including drying. In the case of combined extraction and transesterification of algae. an obvious and critical link between the type of extraction process used and the product composition. Additionally.. and efficiency. thus providing high purity and product that these supercritical process technologies can be concentrations. however. theoretically possible Supercritical fluid extraction of algal oil is far more efficient that if the other upstream algal processing costs could than traditional solvent separation methods. 2006). level that can be scaled to commercial production. effect of milder process conditions. with a methane concentration of 65% (Vergara- al. Several studies have been yield similar to that of the anhydrous process in the carried out that demonstrate the potential of this approach. 2009). 1987). at less than 50˚C. it is envisioned as being applicable for the processing biofuel production. there are no organic solvent applied in the processing of algae.4 ml/g-d of biogas can be realized using a two- efficiency. further study will also 6. which supercritical process to produce biodiesel from vegetable 6.. 2008. Supercritical fluids The clear immediate priority. and as such may be a process is capable of tolerating water. the overall algal biorefinery in the extraction of other components within algae (Mendes. fundamental and exhaustive understanding of the different at least in the case of vegetable oil processing. a The economics of supercritical transesterification process. triacylglycerides. cost.Supercritical Processing oils in one step using alcohols (Anitescu et al. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   53 .3 Conversion of Algal Extracts be needed to avoid saponification. $0. either whole or its residues in the extract or spent biomass (Demirbas. such as Laminaria hyperbore and simultaneous extraction and transesterification of vegetable Laminaria saccharina.. lower reaction temperatures.. raw.26/ and converting oils into biofuels (Demirbas. in place. In the case of catalyst-free supercritical ethanol costs associated with algal biofuels. unprocessed algae and that there is no negative thereby increasing the efficiency of the process.e..

(Ataya et al. Diesel. mitigate saponification chemical. it has been shown that One recommended research focus would be to further transesterification of algal oil can be achieved with ethanol develop these homogeneous catalysts to tolerate the and sodium ethanolate serving as the catalyst (Zhou & contaminants expected to be present in algal extracts. When the transesterification reaction reactions (Wahlen et al. biochemical. 2008). The products of these reactions are typically separated by adding ether and salt water to the In addition to alternative catalysts.. An alternative from the ether by a vaporizer under a high vacuum. Though acid catalysts have these advantages. enhancing the product recovery be employed to convert algal extracts. it was can be performed via catalytic or non-catalytic reaction shown that HPA-catalyzed transesterification of vegetable systems using different heating systems that are required oil achieves higher reaction rates than conventional to initiate the reaction. which is simply a process of such as H3PW12O40/Nb2O5. Kerosene. 2008). strength resulted in lower pretreatment temperatures.can be converted into biodiesel. have been shown to lower the displacement of an alcohol group from an ester by required temperatures and decrease the reaction times another alcohol (Demirbas. The replacement of is carried out in the presence of microwaves. heteropolyacids (HPA). therefore. Higher temperatures and longer reaction The transesterification reaction is employed to convert times are. (Exhibit 6. This section discusses water and free acids.. HCl is accelerated and requires shorter reaction times. and therefore. 2008. Xu mature and has been demonstrated to be the “gold et al. the reaction soluble bases by liquid acid catalysts such as H2SO4. 2006). generally required as a result. Olefin Diesel Diesel Aromatics 54 6. Biodiesel is then separated processing variants that appear promising.2 Schematic of the various conversion strategies of algal extracts into biofuels Algal Oil Extracts Chemical Enzymatic Catalytic Transesterfication Conversion Cracking Liquid or Biodiesel Vapor Fuel (ME) Catalytic Catalytic Upgrading Upgrading Gasoline. there are other solution and mixing well. In addition to the classic base. Boocock. In triacylglycerols extracted from algae to FAMEs (fatty order to compensate for this. and catalytic processes that can and emulsification. they are not currently preferred due to their lower activity than the conventional transesterification Chemical Transesterification alkaline catalysts. Recently. catalyzed methanol approach. 2008).. As a or H3PO4 is also considered an attractive alternative as result. 2007). heating system that can be used to enhance the kinetics of transesterification involves the use of microwaves (Refaat Another route is found in acid-catalyzed transesterification & El Sheltawy.. This technology is relatively mineral acids due to their higher acid strength (L. 2009). a drastic reduction in the quantity of co-products the acidic catalysts are less sensitive to the presence of and a short separation time are obtained (Lertsathapornsuk Exhibit 6. acid methyl esters)... Cao et al. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   .2). Transesterification (Alsalme et al. 2008). The apparent higher activity of certain standard” in the conversion of vegetable oils into biodiesel HPAs with respect to polyoxometallates of higher (Hossain et al. 2008).

converting carbohydrates into conventional processes (Svensson and Adlercreutz. defining biodiesel production addresses these problems and necessary enzyme reactions (cell wall deconstruction offers an environmentally more attractive option to the and autolysin). (a) both the negative effects caused by excessive methanol and co-product glycerol can be eliminated completely. 2008). at a commercial scale and at competitive prices. but (Lopez-Hernandez et al. they have not been demonstrated at large scale mainly due to the relatively high price of lipase and its short operational life caused by the negative Catalytic Cracking effects of excessive methanol and co-product glycerol. reaction temperatures. inexpensive (McNeff et al. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   55 . There have been of the two types of sites in the overall reaction in terms some recent reports of using a solvent engineering of efficiency and cost. to their corresponding esters but have drawbacks such as being energy-intensive. 1998). Use of biocatalysts cell walls. These preliminary results indicate that that a co-solvent mixture may be critical in defining microwave processing may be cost-competitive with the the optimal reaction medium for the lipases. 2008). as with other approaches. these catalysts still require purification One critical area that needs to be addressed is the solvent and removal from the product stream. it has been noted 6. One potential solution to this is the enable efficient biocatalytic processing. 2005). and optimization of enzymes that are catalyzed transesterification (Stavarache et al.. sugars. In particular. 2008. increasingly attractive. Although enzymatic approaches have become converting lipids into a suitable diesel surrogate. Liao et al. 2006). This cavitation provides simultaneously reuse. which increases and temperature tolerance of the enzymes in order to the overall costs. have been proven as a viable means of triacylglycerols for biodiesel production (Su and Wei. engineering. Lewis acid catalysts. ultrasonic waves cause (b) high reaction rates and conversion can be obtained.. production.. indicates that the use of this co-solvent mixture in the In addition. one of the most transesterification process (Armenta et al. Hence the process of transesterification can run inline rather than using the To that end. catalysts may be used to enhance the enzymatic biodiesel production has several advantages: impact of microwave irradiation (Yuan et al. Although very effective and relatively economical. difficulty in removing the glycerol.. 2008). 2008). catalyzing nucleic acid hydrolysis. In the ultrasonic reactor method. 2007). novel enzymes with desired characteristics that are more suitable for industrial applications (Guncheva et al. time-consuming batch process used in traditional base. Enzyme immobilization may also play Biochemical (Enzymatic) Conversion a key role in developing an economic method of Chemical processes give high conversion of triacylglycerols biocatalytic transesterification (Yamane et al. 2008). converting triacylglycerols into fatty acid methyl esters.et al. and (d) the operational stability of the catalyst is the mixing and heating required to carry out the high. the reaction mixture to produce and collapse bubbles (c) no catalyst regeneration steps are needed for lipase constantly.. and 2008)... and energy input (Kalva et al. both types of sites could be solvents to varying degrees to enable cost-effective present and it is not easy to evaluate the relative importance biofuel production (Fang et al. It is capable of producing these reactions in a variety of estimated that industrial-scale ultrasonic devices can allow environments and on different types of oil feedstocks for the processing of several thousand barrels per day. Bioprospecting for will require further innovation to reach production levels the enzymes in extreme environments may produce sufficient for massive and scalable biofuel production. This work more mature conversion processes currently available. The presence of development of immobilized heterogeneous and/ solvents is sometimes necessary to enhance the solubility or homogeneous catalysts that are very efficient and of the triacylglycerols during the extraction process. much R&D is needed in the discovery... Again.. 2003). Acid and basic catalysts and the enzymes used in the downstream conversion could be classified as Brönsted or Lewis catalysts.. such as method to enhance the lipase-catalyzed methanolysis of AlCl3 or ZnCl2. in many cases. Thus significant roadblocks to demonstrating the validity of using an ultrasonic reactor for biodiesel production this approach lies in the conversion of algal oil extracts drastically reduces the reaction time. 2007). Other important issues that need further exploration and require removal of alkaline catalyst from the product are developing enzymes that can lyse the algal and treatment of alkaline wastewater. The transesterification catalysts presented above are These factors must be addressed before a commercially very strong and relatively mature in the field of biofuel viable biochemical conversion process can be realized. optimizing specific enzyme activity to (lipases) in transesterification of triacylglycerols for function using heterogeneous feedstocks. process must be able to function in the presence of these However.

for whale oil.240°C). active catalysts during transesterification. temperatures of about 170˚C). the with TiVO4 being the most active (Cozzolino et al. be completed before these catalysts are fully understood. It is worth noting that the Double-metal cyanide Fe-Zn proved to be promising petroleum industry began by developing a replacement catalysts resulting in active transesterification of oil. Typical biological molecules One of the most difficult challenges is finding an ideal have very high oxygen contents as compared to crude oil. gasoline.. Other based analog. using autoignition characteristics (as measured by octane number HTiNbO3 as the catalyst. flash point. CaO. they can be used even with oils containing significant Gasoline. straight chain alkanes are poor starting materials for gasoline because they provide low octane numbers. catalytic hydrocracking and hydrotreating. begun to explore the conversion of vegetable oils and waste animal fats into renewable fuels.60 bar). catalysts derived from the titanium and modification of the components in crude oil to yield compound possessing the general formula ATixMO. On the other hand. A major characteristic of petroleum-derived catalyst examples include MgO. Although are stable. but have essentially in the esterification reaction. Fatty acids are well suited to conversion to diesel and jet fuel with few processing steps. were employed in vegetable oil performance specifications than by the sum of specific transesterification. The catalysts obtained are stable and molecules. presented above seem to be good candidates for industrial and catalytic structural isomerization. Conversion to Renewable Diesel. The fuel products are a which A represents a hydrogen atom or an alkaline metal mixture of components that vary based on input stream atom. and they are better defined by their integer not greater than 7. 56 6. demanding additional isomerization steps or high octane blendstocks. Many of the catalysts cracking. and diesel are generally described as amounts of free fatty acids and water. One particular concern is the stability and longevity of Various refiners and catalyst developers have already the catalysts in a representative reaction environment. the process pressure is high perspective. and give high glycerol yield with high activities. and Al2O3. can play a vital role in achieving high conversion Gasoline. and Jet Fuel efficiencies of up to 98% (Soriano et al. jet fuel. Moreover. M a niobium atom or a tantalum atom.. oil industry has begun to cast a wider net and has spent 2006). obtained in a fixed-bed reactor at 200˚C and 35 bar. fuels is high energy content which is a function of a near-zero oxygen content. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . As noted in chapter 8. and insoluble. the predominant feedstock for the industry is crude oil. and x is an and process steps. Vanadate metal compounds or cetane number). From a refinery’s At these temperatures. All of the processes that take place in a modern petroleum refinery can be divided into two categories. The catalysts are active feedstock. and now it is apparent that it is beginning to These catalysts are Lewis acids. This process has already provided the renewable jet fuel blends (derived from oils obtained from jatropha and algae) used in recent commercial jet test flights. There remain significant can be used for the production of typical fuels without fundamental studies and unanswered questions that must disruptive changes in processes or infrastructure. 2009). the process development but must resist poisoning and the feedstock is considered fungible with petroleum and leaching of active components. A typical diesel must meet a multitude of performance specifications FAME yield of 91% and glycerol yield of 91% were that include volatility. such as tehtrahydrofuran. probably due to the “renewable” or “green” if it is derived from a biological hydrophobicity of their surface. is largely a process of eliminating oxygen and temperatures than the ones currently used (~220 .The presence of a co-solvent. jet fuel. separation In another example. in comparison to the homogenous catalyst at lower therefore. heterogeneous catalyst that has comparable activity Conversion of biological feedstocks to renewable fuels. This catalyst is also more active than HTiNbO3. which translates to very costly plant design of those operations already in place: thermal or catalytic and construction requirements. a great deal of resources developing additional inputs producing the same yields with lower residence times. reducing the concentration the same performance specifications as the petroleum- of free fatty acids in non-refined oil or in used oil. such as biomass or plant oil. maximizing the final energy content. initial and final boiling point. and cloud point. In this way. hydrophobic (at reaction return to biological feedstocks to keep the pipelines full. such as oil shale and tar sands. the ideal conversion process would make use (40 . in an assortment of end products.

and reduce double bonds to yield technology that derives benefit from every potential hydrocarbons. nitrogen from extracted proteins. 1979). In particular. It will be desirable to tune catalysts such that the extraction (Ashare and Wilson. and for recycle to the culture.. the attack on the oxygen-bearing carbon atoms will minimize organic fractions of the algae remaining after oil extraction the amount of CO and CO2 lost. The biogas product typically contains 60% found within the petroleum stream (e.Algal lipids can be processed by hydrothermal treatment 6. or One other critical aspect in developing a conversion carbon monoxide. as well as the amount of are amenable to anaerobic digestion. little if any pretreatment function within a certain range of chemical components is required. current use have been optimized for existing petroleum feedstocks and have the appropriate specificity and activity Anaerobic digestion can be effectively used as a means to carry out the expected reactions in a cost-effective of producing biogas from algae and algal remnants after manner. as well as the fermentation of renewable fuels is catalyst development. Referred to as hydrotreating. Glycerin can be converted to propane input is the conversion of algal remnants after which can be used for liquefied petroleum gas. a chemical reductive process). once H2 used. This includes the anaerobic digestion of algal remnants The primary barrier to utilizing algae oils to make to produce biogas.4 Processing of Algal (basically. metals. this process will convert the carboxylic Remnants after Extraction acid moiety to a mixture of water. 6. Crude algal oil may contain high levels of phosphorous the nitrogen can be recovered in the form of ammonia from phospholipids. contains soluble nitrogen from the original algal proteins. In addition. and sulfur methane and 40% CO2 by volume. The liquid effluent and nitrogen heteroatoms) without becoming poisoned. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   57 .g. contaminants to arrive at the most cost-effective process. carbon dioxide. Catalysts in any recoverable polysaccharides into biofuels. It will amount of polysaccharides and other oligosaccharides be necessary to optimize both the level of purification of present in the algal remnants that are well suited for algal lipid as well as the tolerance of the catalyst for the traditional fermentation into ethanol and other biofuels. There will also likely be a high metals (especially magnesium) from chlorophyll. Refinery catalysts have also been developed to the algae has been harvested. conversion of algal feedstock into fuel.

High temperature gasification of biomass in an atmospheric entrained flow reactor. Y. and Kozhevnikov. M. (2009). In Gaigneaux E. 3rd (1994). S. J. 9th Int. Andersson. MA (USA). Baevre..J.. 101(1)... P. Energy and Fuels.. Biodiesel production from high acid value waste frying oil catalyzed by superacid heteropolyacid... Anitescu. Radchenkova. 1391-1399. F. 162. Energy. Liu.. Vinatoru. 21–50. Fatty Acid Composition of Some Malaysian Seaweeds.V.. W.]. 170-176. Y. Conf. 28(10).L. Applied Catalysis A: General. 53(6). V.A. Integrated technology for supercritical biodiesel production and power cogeneration.R. 349(1-2).. Energy-Oxford. Indergaard.M.. Sep. Energy Conversion and Management. S. Eloy. and Environmental Effects. Supported vanadium oxide nanoparticles: Effect of preparation method. and Ruiz. Fuel.F. (2000). CO2 fixation and ethanol production with microalgal photosynthesis and intracellular anaerobic fermentation. 14(1). A. Van de Beld. 1679-1693. Thermal efficiency of the HTU® process for biomass liquefaction.. B. Adv. Proceedings of the Progress in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion.M. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society.. Burja.. A. Kenawi. 579-582. G. 22(2). September 10-14. Energy Fuels. Bos.. F. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Sustainable transportation fuels from biomass materials. J. Norazmi Mohamed.. 22(2-3). and Ogushi. Z.. Transesterification of fish oil to produce fatty acid ethyl esters using ultrasonic energy. Z. E. F.. (1997). L.. Belgium. 137-142.. Heteropoly acids as catalysts for liquid- phase esterification and transesterification.M. Chen. 129-132. F. A newly isolated organic solvent tolerant staphylococcus saprophyticus M36 produced organic solvent-stable lipase. A. A. 85(2). (2009). Pap.. Austria.. Martens.. Deshpande.. (2007). A. A. M. Kozhevnikova.. Current Microbiology. Malaysian Journal of Science.A. In (Ed) Bridgwater. R. O. N.. I.. Ashare.. S.. M... Acidolysis of tripalmitin with oleic acid catalyzed by a newly isolated thermostable lipase.V. Biomass Convers. Di Serio. A. Lu. Hirano. Bridgewater Anthony. 163-168. (2008).A. S.References Alsalme.. (1987). Part A: Recovery. & Wilson. E. (Eds. Analysis of digester design concepts. N. M. P. Fuel Processing Technology.. De Vos. Biodiesel from waste cooking oil via base-catalytic and supercritical methanol transesterification. and Kambourova. Ding. A. T. and Ascophyllum nodosum and application of end products. Tyrol.. (2006).. 679-685. M. Zhiryakova... H..E.. (2008). Tesser. G. A. Cozzolino. and Environmental Effects.E. Cao. 923-927. W. Balat.. Ataya... and Santacesaria. M. Ueda. Demirbas. and Barrow. Boerefijn. 88(3). Devillers. and Tavlarides.. (1979). G. 2000. Gaigneaux. (2009). UK: Blackwell Science. 50(4). R. Jacobs.. Variables affecting the induction period during acid-catalyzed transesterification of canola oil to FAME. S. Education. Louvain-la-Neuve.. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . Energy Sources. 2006. Oily products from mosses and algae via pyrolysis. [Ed. Production of biodiesel from algae oils. X. Symposium. (2008).. F. Fang. A. J.E. A. 510-515. Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts Proc. (pp. 86(14-15). Y. F.. Rev. M. Van der Wal. M. Goudriaan. G. Aresta. and Ternan. 22(1). I. Wang. O.. Oestgaard... Int. M. Wang.E. Naber.. J. Dube. 22(2). support and type of precursor on the catalytic performances in the ODH of methanol to formaldehyde.. Oxford. Hirayama. Demirbas. 93-100. and Xu. 17-22. Armenta. A. and Zeevalkink.. S. 83-103. Bie. Thermochem. Guncheva.. Thermal Science. and Barberio. Anaerobic digestion of Laminaria spp. E. 1045-1052. Hermans. Zaher. 1312-1325). and Jensen. Meeting Date 1993. M. A. M. R... J. X. Pedersen. Science and Technology. (2006). 84(11).. Hanssen. F. & Phang. Utilization of macro-algae for enhanced CO2 fixation and biofuels production: Development of a computing software for an LCA study. E. 31(2). Demirbas. Biodiesel fuel from Jatropha oil via non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification. 58 6.) Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. A. Dynatech R/D Co. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 697-704. COO-2991-42.. Hallgren. 338-49. 933-940.(2006). Biomass fast pyrolysis. 8(2). (1993). 21-27. Kamal. and Bjerle. J. S.. Wang. E... Part A: Recovery. Utilization. Chu. (2008). (2006). Zhai. Energy Sources. 1-13. 17(1-2).A. Lv. D. (2004). W. Cambridge.. and Zhu. Li. Utilization. and El Diwani. Biomass. (2005). K. (2003). (2008). P. Hawash.. D. J.M. L. Kralovec. C.. Dibenedetto. F.

F... S. (2006). R. S. Towards sustainable production of biofuels from microalgae. 513-524 McHugh. M..Q. A.C. McNeff.. Taylor and Francis. Mahajani. Inc. Ogi.. K. 1735-1738. 15(6). S. Nowlan. Koegel. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. and Krisnangkura.Y. 89(12). Murata. Sivasankar. (2007). 6. Sawayama. B.K.Hirayama. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology. H. (2003). and Moholkar. 413-417. Stahl.. and Hill. 153-164. Y. In Martinez. 128(1-2).. Q. An overview of aqueous-phase catalytic processes for production of hydrogen and alkanes in a biorefinery. A.. and Okakura. Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds. Kalva. & Stuercke. 14(4). Synthesis using bio-syngas and CO2.. Catalysis Today. and Sanjay M.. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Nutraceuticals and Bioactive Compounds (pp. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis over Ru catalysts by using syngas derived from woody biomass. McDermid.. Henrich. Biotechnology Letters. Kishimoto. (2004). 39-48. K.. Y.. Raffelt. Vinatoru.. Oil production from algal cells of dunaliella tertiolecta by direct thermochemical liquefaction.N. Tran. M. High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides. R. (2008).. E. M. J. Fuel.T. Yokoyama.L. A. 657-660. A guide to the seaweed industry.E. 4(3). and Weirich. S. Patil..T. Lertsathapornsuk. and Yokoyama..L.. T. A continuous catalytic system for biodiesel production. C. (Ed. Okabe. S. B. Miao. A. 119–132. R. 729-731.. Phillips. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 74. Maeda. C.G. Soriano. Lipase-catalyzed transesterification of medium-chain triacylglycerols and a fully hydrogenated soybean oil. Venditti. Hon-Nami. M. (2006).. and Hoye. H. Applied Catalysis. C. H.. Fedie. Y. Fuel Processing Technology. Lopez-Hernandez. Hossain. Chowdhury. and Giselroed. Ueda. (2008). N.. Gyberg. A unique feature of hydrogen recovery in endogenous starch-to-alcohol fermentation of the marine microalga.. Aryusuk.. 70(6). S.. 129(1-3). Catalysis Letters. 189-213).. D.. S. T. Garcia. Yan. Chang. Y. M. J. Salleh.. CO2 fixation and oil production Through microalga. Nurunnabi. 9(7). Huber. Malik. 171-176. (2007).. Ethanol production from CO2 by fermentative microalgae. J. A. Refaat. (2009). and Argyropoulos. Ogushi. V. A. 46(26). Journal of Food Science. Pairintra.. S.. Minowa. (2007). 8887-8897. (2008). S. Chlamydomonas perigranulata. 1330-1336. and Shieh. and Naqiuddin... V. 4(4). K. and Bandow. T. R.. (2003). D. Samejima. 48(1). X. Rasmussen. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. Nakanishi.T. G.. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 114(Advances in Chemical Conversions for Mitigating CO2).. Jr.. Hon-Nami. 131(1-3).. A. B. The BTL2 process of biomass utilization entrained-flow gasification of pyrolyzed biomass slurries. (2008). J. R.3-diglyacylcerols by mixture response surface methodology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   59 .Jr. V.J. 560-565. Dote. T.W. J.. K. (2007). A. B. C.L.V.. Inoue. Hirano. Time factor in microwave-enhanced biodiesel production. M. Y. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. K. R.. 1188-1195. Stavarache. Supercritical fluid extraction of active compounds from algae.R. H... and Wu. 534-544. 66-71. K. 25(21). Boyce. (1995). Krohn. A: General.C. 1857-1861. & Dumesic. and Kunito. (2008).. D.... W. A. and Liu. Technoeconomic analysis of a lignocellulosic biomass indirect gasification process to make ethanol via mixed alcohols synthesis.. Food and Agriculture Organization. 11(4). C365-C372. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 343(1-2). (2005). L. Biodiesel synthesis via homogeneous Lewis acid-catalyzed transesterification. Srinivas. A. Steinhardt. K. 36. 250-254. (1995).U. 279-288. Biodiesel fuel production from algae as renewable energy. Ultrasonically driven continuous process for vegetable oil transesterification. K. W..-Y... (2006).). Physical mechanism of ultrasound-assisted synthesis of biodiesel. (2009). Tsai. T.. A. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. R. Journal of Applied Phycology. Application of solvent engineering to optimize lipase-catalyzed 1. Journal of Biotechnology. (2003). J.. S.S.S. S. D. Energy Conversion and Management. 85-93. 110(1). Fuel. Mendes. F.. 111(1-2).. (1998). P. M. K. and El Sheltawy.R. 88(3). (2008). Microwave assisted in continuous biodiesel production from waste frying palm oil and its performance in a 100 kW diesel generator.F.. 808-828. McNeff. Liao.S. Energy for Sustainable Development.

Yu.. Yang. 39(23). Oliveira. Roxana R. Chinese Science Bulletin.Svensson. Synthesis of biodiesel using microwave absorption catalysts. L. I. 83(12). (2008). & Wu. I. Da Silva.. Catalysis Today. N. E.C... and Wei.R. and Magrini-Bair.. Zhang.. Guo. 55(3-4). Y. 60 6. Preparation of mesoporous polyoxometalate-tantalum pentoxide composite catalyst and its application for biodiesel production by esterification and transesterification. Synthesis of biodiesel from mixed feedstocks and longer chain alcohols using an acid-catalyzed method.A. 338-344. J. I. G.... 864(Enzyme Engineering XIV). B. Influences of bacterial degradation on gases generated by pyrolysis of heterotrophically yellowing algae.. Evaluation of marine algae as a source of biogas in a two-stage anaerobic reactor system. A. Phase distributions of alcohol. 1007-1013.. K. 746-755.. Su. L.. B. 170-175. Green Chemistry. and catalyst in the transesterification of soybean oil. Vieitez. and Doisaki. (2006). Y. I. F. Corazza... (1994).. Q. Vargas. 2805-2809. Effect of temperature on the continuous synthesis of soybean esters under supercritical ethanol. 106(1-4). Biodiesel fuel from vegetable oil by various supercritical alcohols. H. Zhang. X. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . 1047-1052. Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Oliveira. and Zhu. Multiple intensified performance of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in organic medium. D. 499-507.H.R. (2008). J.. 2018-2022.. H. Y. B. M... H. glycerol. Energy and Fuels. and Boocock. 4223-4228. F. B. Iwasaki Y. G. (2004)... D. Improvement in lipase-catalyzed methanolysis of triacylglycerols for biodiesel production using a solvent engineering method. (2008).. Xiang. Da Silva. Yang. W. Continuous production of soybean biodiesel in supercritical ethanol-water mixtures.. and Fu. D.. G. L. Corazza. W. Borges. Biomass and Bioenergy.. (2006). Xu.. and Adlercreutz.M. C. Energy and Fuels. 548-552. Y. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. Yamane T.. Yung.. G.. R. B. and Seefeldt. 32(4). (2008). Jablonski.V. Zhou. Barney. (2009).M. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. Wahlen. Zhong. and Li. A highly active and stable Fe-Mn catalyst for slurry Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. I. S. 171-179. J. Yuan. 23(4). (2008)... Wang. 1874-1887. 558-563. X. Identification of triacylglycerols in the enzymatic transesterification of rapeseed and butter oil.A. 793-801. Journal of Biotechnology. and Velasco... B.. 22(4). J. G. 22(6). Grompone. Kusdiana. Alarcon.. 115(1-3). 110(11). Energy and Fuels. Alckmin. (2008). Wu.. Vergara-Fernandez. Warabi.. and Jachmanian. C.. (1998). N.C. P. 118-125. Vieitez.Y. (2008). G. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.S. Y. Grompone. 23(1). and Clark.V.Y. (2005). Xu. Miao. Energy and Fuels. 10(7).. L. X. and Jachmanian. Energy and Fuels.A. Yang.C. Borges. (2009).D. J.M. 126.. A. M.. Shimidzu N. 23(1). Sheng. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. M. Q. and Saka.

This chapter will of algal biomass becomes feasible (Mooibroek et al. cosmetics. For the purposes of the Roadmap. $0. glycerol. without invoking competing co. Using appropriate technologies. proteins and a variety of inorganic and complex organic molecules – 7. and they may vary from region to in Exhibit 7. is predicted to be generated by the process. 2007) address these options and discuss how some of them and must be considered in determining the economics of are better opportunities as they will not readily saturate the process. high-value and high-volume chemicals from biomass raw material must be considered as a means to amino acids. etc. Exhibit 7. generation will inevitably compete for carbon. as a “high value” product biorefinery the possibility of coupling biomass cultivation to a fine chemical producer might be well over several with CO2 mitigation (for carbon credits) and wastewater dollars/lb. hormones.30 . all primary components of algal biomass – carbohydrates. and can be produced at a volume of roughly 100 . dyes. either through Microalgae and Cyanobacteria chemical.1 Commercial Products from can be converted into different products. and efficiencies and reduced environmental impacts may have a variety of specialty products such as bioflocculants. corresponding markets in the long term.2. poly-unsaturated fatty acids. Moreover. Inorganics Proteins enzymes. to be developed to handle the large amount of waste that biodegradable polymers.. fertilizers and soil conditioners. valued chemical is defined as one that will cost roughly products. Heat. The use of terms such as “high volume” or “high value” This chapter will also address within the context of the can be extremely subjective. and nitrogen-containing components enhance the economics of the process. Co-products   61 . 2007 7. The nature of the end products and of the technologies A large number of different commercial products have been to be employed will be determined.500 x106 lbs/yr. aromatic essences. a reasonably benefits to the technology. enzymatic or microbial conversion (see Chapter 6). flavors.$1.00/lb. this chapter will focus on co-products must be correspondingly low since their the non-fuel co-products. As summarized economics of the system. anti-oxidants. and stable isotopes for research purposes. The topic of polysaccharides.1). but considerably under a dollar for a commodity treatment (for nutrient removal) to provide additional producer. electricity Energy Modified from Kamm and Kamm. Indeed. wastewater. fats (oils). CO2 Products and Complex Fats residues from Substances conversion Special substances: processes pigments. Co-products The “guiding truth” is that if biofuel production is conversion of algal biomass to other biofuels has already considered to be the primary goal.1 An overview of the biorefinery concept Biorefinery Aquaculture Primary Refinery Industry Conversion Carbohydrates Raw biomass. reductant. and energy from photosynthesis. novel technologies with increased coloring substances. the production a biorefinery for utilization of every component of the of industrial. pharmaceuticals. Vorlop. the generation of other been discussed (see Chapter 6). primarily by the derived from microalgae and cyanobacteria.7. 2004). the concept of Under the biorefinery concept (Exhibit 7. these include products for human and animal region according to the cost of the raw material (Willke and nutrition.

GLA by Arthrospira. and EPA by microalgal biomass as a human health food supplement Nannochloropsis. cadmium and derived biofuels. it is important to note that since the flue massive lipid production dominates. 2006).. Although it is clear that co-products may other toxic elements.10% (wt.. 2006).e. fertility.000 t/yr Spirulina.5 billion US$. γ-linolenic acid (GLA). The production includes ca.. and Thalassiosira. increasing fuel supplies without drastically increasing price. 1996). and is β–carotene from Dunaliella salina. Spolaore et (e. et al. arsenic.. Tetraselmis. and ca. This situation. 2006). is quickly growing. 1996. Both the production plants and distribution channels) are for high. having presently a retail value of 1. Yet the existing fossil fuels market is and the aquaculture feeds. sold for the health food market. microalgal (of biomass. All other PUFAs to a lesser extent. Dunalliella. The main species used in products. animal feed are Spirulina. The most very large potential markets are developed. these existing markets (and associated Spirulina.. The Dunaliella. which is sold either fish (Benemann. Radmer.) as market for microalgal biomass for animal nutrition and a feed additive for cows. weight gain. the biofuels markets will involve volumes even dogs and cats. not commodity acids determine the nutritional value of microalgal products. AA has been shown to be Food and Feed synthesized by Porphyridium..g. estimated Therein lies a major conundrum associated with the to be about 300 million US$. However. supplant the fossil fuels market) must be commodities • Animal Feed Additive: Microalgal biomass has also based to meet required volumes at price points acceptable been used with good results (i. commonly considered PUFAs are arachidonic acid (AA). the goal of the industry is to produce animal feed. Phaeodactylum and Nitzschia (Spolaore is currently restricted to only a few species. The most prominent aquaculture of mollusks. the resulting non-oil algal improve the economic viability of some algae processes biomass is very likely to be unsuitable for use as an in the short-term. is expected to expand significantly. better immune to the consumer. Scenedesmus. 280 million US$. The market size. Co-products   . Nannochloropsis. only DHA has been produced thus Spirulina (Arthospira). DHA by Crypthecodinium • Human Health Food Supplement: The consumption of and Schizochytrium.. Chlorella. 1990. and soil fertilizer. Pulz and Gross. etc. pigs. Chlorella. However. and far on a commercial scale by microalgae. etc. thereby are known to be effective at metal absorption. 600 t/yr Nostoc. US$. ca. Chlorella and Scenesdesmus. 62 7. 3. al. 1986. The market for microalgal animal feeds. particularly given the fact that algae transportation fuels below their market price. Nitzschia. Skeletonema. poultry. e. from 300 to 3. In poultry rations. which may be added to human food and production at volumes and pricepoints that meet consumer animal feed for their health promoting properties demands or 2) new co-products that are low cost and have (Benemann. 2004. Although small. Most as an extract or as a whole cell powder ranging in price frequently used species are Chaetoceros. is expected to grow in the future. yet in the short term. 2006). 1990. horses. ca. Malcolm et al. Nostoc and Aphanizomenon are more cost-effectively produced from non-algal sources (Radmer.000 t/yr Chlorella. significant amounts of lead.By definition. GLA from evening primrose oil). • Aquaculture: Microalgae are also used as feed in the Benemann. is anticipated to continue until 1) a sufficient Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) number of the challenges outlined earlier in the Roadmap for biofuel production have been overcome and associated Microalgae can also be cultured for their high content life cycle costs are reduced to realize sustainable biofuel in PUFAs. gas from coal-fired power plants that will be used co-products of higher value in the marketplace must be to supply carbon dioxide to the cultures will contain pursued in order to offset the costs of production of algal. nascent algal-derived biofuels market: in the long term. appearance. have also been produced by microalgae (Borowtizka. market size for β–carotene is estimated to be greater than Pavlova. Radmer. protein content and the level of unsaturated fatty value products or co-products from algae.5 billion A number of anti-oxidants.) and scales (sizes and numbers biomass up to a level of 5 .200 t/yr Dunaliella.) can be safely of commercial plants) that are significantly less than those used as a partial replacement for conventional proteins associated with the existing high-value algae-derived (Spoalore et al. Anti-Oxidants The market.000 US$ per kg (Spolaore et al. 1990. currently at about 2. and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Phaeodactylum.. ca. With the possible exception of the existing response. 1999). the DHA oil market is quickly growing.g. 1. crustaceans (shrimp). 500 t/yr Aphanizomenon. docohexaenoic acid (DHA). 2. currently at ~700 future algal-based biofuels market (designed in part to million US$. product. 1994 and 1996). Isochrysis.

Benemann. 2006).200 >280 Spolaore et al. Spolaore et al. pigments in pluvialis... Spolarore et al. 2003. 2006).2 Summary of microalgae commercial products market MARKET SIZE SALES VOLUME COMMERCIAL PRODUCT REFERENCE (TONS/YR) (MILLION $US/YR) BIOMASS Health Food 7. (Olaizola.. growth promoters. dyes for food.000 soil conditioners Metting&Pyne (1986) 7.. (2006) ANTI-OXIDANTS Pulz&Gross (2004) Beta-Carotene 1.. Co-products   63 . no current commercial market Spolaore et al. (2006) EPA Potential product. Pulz&Gross (2004) No available information 5.500 Pulz&Gross (2004) Pulz&Gross (2004) Aquaculture 1. and research. (2006) Phycocyanin No available information >10 Pulz&Gross (2004) Phycoerythrin No available information >2 Pulz&Gross (2004) FERTILIZERS/SOIL CONDITIONERS Fertilizers.Coloring Agents the related carotenoids lutein and zeaxantin.. 2006). 2004. 1986. (2006) PUFA Extracts No available information 10 Pulz&Gross (2004) GLA Potential product. have also been used in the feed of carp and even chicken (Puls and Microalgae-produced coloring agents are used as natural Gross. the cyanobacterium Arthrospira and the rhodophyte Astaxanthin.500 Spolaore et al..000 700 Spolaore et al.000 2. 1990). (2006) Tocopherol CO2 Extract No available information 100-150 Pulz&Gross (2004) COLORING SUBSTANCES Pulz&Gross (2004) Astaxanthin < 300 (biomass) < 150 Spolaore et al. has been successfully used as a salmon feed to cosmetics. Astaxanthin. no current commercial market Spolaore et al.. or as pigments i. are used as food dyes. (2006) Animal Feed Additive No available information 300 Pulz&Gross (2004) POLY-UNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS (PUFAs) ARA No available information 20 Pulz&Gross (2004) Pulz&Gross (2004) DHA <300 1.e. and Exhibit 7. produced by in animal feed (Borowitzka. and as fluorescent reagents in clinical or research give the fish meat a pink color preferred by the consumers laboratories (Spolaore et al.. a carotenoid produced by Hematococcus Porphyridium. phycoerythrin and phycocyanin.. cosmetics. Phycobiliproteins.

Identical to an existing chemical. polysaccharides (Benemann.2 Commercial Products factor. medical) $213 million Carrageenen (Food additive. pharmaceutical. This sets a high bar research (Benemann. fuel. seaweeds) are used as a plant the redox balance favors formation of pyruvate as the end fertilizer and to improve the water-binding capacity and product (Forro. biological/microbiological) $132 million Alginate (Textile printing. Singh et al. 1990). 2001). the product can be labeled “organic” and thus saleable at a premium. must be produced at a cost 30% lower than the existing 1986. Identical in functional performance to an existing chemical. kombu. 2003. 1987).. 1994. 2004). 2.. Alginate. pharmaceuticals and In this instance. Microalgal biomass could in principle serve the same purpose.. material it replaces and to be competitive typically. 2003) PRODUCT VALUE Human Food (Nori. is considered recalcitrant to ethanol fermentation since Currently. Exhibit 7. it 2004). Pulz and Gross. These include acceptable: bioflocculants (Borowitzka.5-6 BILLION 64 7.. 2005. and stable isotopes for material (shutdown economics). pharmaceutical. 1986). This occurs with natural oils which manufacturers in many cases would prefer if the costs Macroalgae possess high levels of structural were comparable. Recovery of Co-products Other Specialty Products Co-products from algal refineries should address one There are a number of specialty products and chemicals of these three criteria to be commercially viable and that can be obtained from microalgae. 1. be very small due to their specialized applications. pet food.e. toothpaste) $240 million Other uses of seaweeds Fertilizers and conditioners $5 million Animal Feed $5 million Macroalgal Biofuels Negligible TOTAL $5.3). food additive.Fertilizers which occurs in high concentrations in brown seaweeds. or with replacements such as algal polysaccharides that are extracted for their commercial proteins for distillers dried grains from corn dry grind value (Exhibit 7. Wu et al. cosmetics (Spolaore et al. aonori. cost of the new product must be equivalent to the 1986. biopolymers and biodegradable plastics (Philip et al. but has been achieved for some chemicals and proteins/ 2004). 1986). Radmer. Metting and Pyne. plant growth regulators could be 7.. 2007. but the source of the material can often provide from Macroalgae some advantage.3 Potential Options for the derived from microalgae (Metting and Pyne.. Olaizola. etc. Furthermore. Here price is a major 7. mineral composition of depleted soils (Metting et al. The production bioactive compounds (Burja et al. macroalgae (i. Borowitzka. The market for these specialty products is likely to nutritional products.) $5 billion Algal hydrocolloids Agar (Food ingredient. 1990. the only issue is price. 2006). They include alginate from brown ethanol processing. 2001.. wakame. Co-products   . Pulz and Gross. Price becomes less of an issue if algae and agar and carrageenen from red algae. 1990. Pulz and Gross. or other product.3 Global value of seaweed products per annum (McHugh. fuel or other product.

In this case. is the anaerobic • Option 1 – Maximum energy recovery from digestion of lipid-extracted biomass. and Benemann. and combustion. with potential whole (i.4 Overview of the five Algal Biomass potential options for the recovery and use of co-products Option 1 Extract Lipids Energy for Fuel Burn Residue Ash/ Soil Amendments Option 5 Soil Fertilizer/ Conditioners Dry Residue Processing Proteins as Option 2 Co-Products Food/ Feed Supplement Processing Option 3 Non-Fuel Surfactants/ Bioplastics Lipids Chemical/ Biological Conversion Option 4 Carbohydrates Ethanol/ Butanol/ Glycerol Chemical/ Biological Conversion 7.4). Co-products   65 . Recycle Nitrogen Gases Exhibit 7. the issues enough markets for potential co-products. with reported methane yields of about 0.unh. Nevertheless. as is currently already done for • Option 5 – Recovery/extraction of fuel certain waste water treatment sludges (see http://www. non-extracted) micro and macroalgal biomass use of residuals as soil amendments has been successfully demonstrated. There are at least five different options for recovering economic value from the lipid-extracted microalgal biomass The most promising energy recovery technology. 2009). with use of the residual biomass edu/p2/biodiesel/pdf/algae_salton_sea. it may be difficult to identify large performance characteristics. and the glycerol as nutrients for algal cultivation or could be sold as soil from the transesterification of lipids to biodiesel fertilizers and conditioners. These are: from a practical and economic perspective. The economic value of the produced extracted biomass for use in food and feed methane is equivalent to about $100 per ton of digested • Option 3 – Recovery and utilization of non-fuel lipids biomass.3. lipids only.3 l per gram volatile solids (Huesemann • Option 2 – Recovery of protein from the lipid. which is significant in terms of reducing the overall cost of liquid biofuels production. gasification. such as pyrolysis.pdf). However. 2009). thermochemical research needs are discussed below. Residuals as Soil Amendments these technologies are still in the testing and development Given the large amounts of lipid-extracted biomass residues stage.e. which could then be either sold on the new product. Maximum Energy Recovery from the (see Chapter 6). The residuals • Option 4 – Recovery and utilization of carbohydrates remaining after anaerobic digestion could either be recycled from lipid-extracted biomass. both (Exhibit 7. could also be potentially considered for the recovery of energy from the lipid-extracted biomass Option 1. could have poor or even negative energy balances (Huesemann and Benemann. the open market or used on-site in the various biorefinery operations. and because of their large energy inputs (temperature that will likely be generated in future microalgal biofuels and pressure). conversion technologies. one are less related to costs and more to the functional option would be to convert as much of the lipid-extracted performance and potentially enhanced performance of biomass into energy. with Potential Use of a much larger fraction of biomass into fuels. as soil fertilizer and conditioner Each option and its associated technologies and future In addition to anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion of the lipid extracted biomass. New material with unique and useful functional production systems.. Therefore. These technologies are able to convert Lipid-Extracted Biomass.

the market for animal feed (cattle..e. (b) approximately 100 grams which is used in the formulation of a variety of industrial of cellulase are needed per gallon of ethanol. Similarly. solvents (acetone. propionic. which contains proteins. poultry. also benefit from supplementation with microalgal proteins. least 10. The current price for DDGS ranges from $110 . than $0. a food and feed supplement. bioplastics. 1995).3-propanediol. Finally. which can be converted into polypropylene oxide. adhesives.150 per ton After the extraction of lipids. Choi. glycerol microalgal cellulases could be provided at a cost of less could be converted by certain bacteria to 1. 2007). As of industrial surfactants. Since biomass may contain sufficient levels of carbohydrates that protein is generally the key and often limiting ingredient could be converted through anaerobic dark fermentations in animal feed. butanol is a valuable C4 compound of feed. could also be anaerobically pretreating lignocellulosic feedstocks prior to fermentation fermented to the above mentioned and other end products to fuel ethanol.txt). is the starting material for the production of polyester. Hydrogen and The byproduct material.ams. ethanol. 2001). Furthermore.gov/mnreports/sj_gr225. and lactic) (Huesemann and Benemann. etc. generate electricity directly in biofuel cells (Yildiz and 66 7. the individual local markets for animal feed are often not succinate is an intermediate in the production of a variety located adjacent to areas where algae may be produced. However. thus butanol could serve to the amount of byproduct that would be produced. Furthermore. aliphatic polyesters. the residual microalgal (http://www. is potentially very large. relative derived ethylene and propylene. and as a renewable substitute (Zerlov et al. Recovery of Protein from the Lipid-Extracted It may be worthwhile. and (c) at products such as polymers. ammonia and nitrous oxides) could of fatty acids with carbon numbers ranging from C10 to C24. butyric. 1 billion kg. the protein fraction and specialty products such as urethanes. Option 2. and Option 4. and paint (Yazdani and Gonzalez. For example. it will be necessary to either separate the soil amendment. 2007). 2007). 2008).the thermochemical conversion of lipid-extracted biomass Option 3. Furthermore. acetic. green solvents and a result. 2009.. antifreeze. a byproduct of the transesterification of market for industrial enzymes.5 billion gallons of lignocellulosic ethanol will be solvents. however. it may be possible to recover important industrial production of green solvents. However. jet fuel. would require the use of specially selected or engineered microalgal strains capable of producing these enzymes. specifically cellulases for microalgal lipids to biodiesel.g. due to issues such as taste of the meat or eggs. for chemical synthesis of a variety of products. Since the generation of gasoline.usda. biomass for liquid biofuel production.20 per gallon ethanol. supplementation with microalgal proteins to hydrogen. Assuming that (a) (Yazdani and Gonzalez. glycerol could be used to potentially very large. biodegradable plastics (Kamm and Kamm. Recovery and Utilization of Non-fuel Lipids has the potential advantage that the resulting nitrogen- It is well known that microalgae can synthesize a variety containing gases (e. Kamm and Kamm. byproduct markets are likely to be overwhelmed. pigs. feeding studies acids could serve as renewable feedstocks for the chemicals indicate that algae cannot be used as a high percentage industry. 2007. and its applications enzymes such as cellulases or other industrial enzymes include the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries from the lipid-extracted biomass. i. while butanol and organic make a useful animal feed. produced by 2020. human nutrition may organic acids (formic. As was pointed out above. might ethanol could be used as biofuel. current levels. (Hu et al. to separate specific Biomass for Use in Food and Feed lipids present in the algal oil that have utility as chemical Following the extraction of lipids from the microalgal feedstocks for the manufacture of surfactants. Co-products   .. it is also used in the In addition. including and interactions with animal digestion. this option (Datta et al. from the residual biomass could be extracted and used as lubricants. Recovery and Utilization of Carbohydrates pets) is already very large and growing (estimated to rise from Lipid-Extracted Biomass. thereby depending on the algal species and culturing conditions reducing the expense for nitrogen fertilizers. and the Glycerol from the to approximately 60 million tons per year for distillers dry Transesterification of Lipids to Biodiesel grains plus soluble (DDGS)) (Berger and Good. fish. the polymers that are currently produced from fossil oil- overall size of the animal feed market is small.. the projected market for cellulases is 2007. The Glycerol. Kawaguchi et al.. 2006). be recycled into the microalgal culture ponds. 2008). and butanol). succinic. polycarbonates and polyurethanes. detergents. product into the appropriate range or rearrange the carbon chains through catalytic cracking and catalytic reforming. Furthermore. Lactic and byproduct prices will be greatly depressed versus acid. the mineral-rich ash generated by these thermochemical and diesel substitutes will require specific ranges of carbon processes could possibly be used for nutrient recycle or as a chain length.. epoxies. and could be advantageous.

7. M. Metting. i.M. Glycerol-based biorefinery for fuels and chemicals. Microbial degradation of marine biomass. J. K. Ghirardi. Co-products   67 . Biofuels from microalgae: Review of products.H. additional capacity from algal lipids may find it Use of the Residual Biomass as Soil Fertilizer exceedingly difficult to find uses. D. (105). J. 5.. it applications (Mooibroek et al. (2). J. Choi. and P. 386-394... J. Technological and economic potential of poly(lactic acid) and lactic acid derivatives.S. 247-256. Benemann. M. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. the market for organic fertilizer is large As was the case with Option 3. Huesemann. Hu. Finally. No. New Hampshire. Distillers dried grains plus solubles utilization by livestock and poultry in corn-based ethanol in Illinois and the U. W.. B. Champaign-Urbana. (2001). and biotechnology. organic matter as soil fertilizer and conditioners. Netherlands. (31). Algal Biology. 277-282. Burgess. Moon. J. Burja. 372-375. 2007). M. 9347-9377.R. (2007). J. B. 589-627. H2 production from algal biomass by a mixed culture of rhodobium marinum A-501 and lactobacillus amylovorus. Q.175-204.. and potential. B. S. R&D efforts as discussed under Chapter 2. Developments in industrial microbiology. Good. The alga dunaliella: biodiversity. A Report from the Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics. Tetrahedon. 221-231. E. B.G. physiology.. P. proteins.jsp?article_id=377). Darzins. Biorefineries – multi product processes. Food and Agriculture Organization. L. processes. Introduction to Applied Phycology. van Staden. University of Illinois. specifically. Berger. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. Frank. (54). these are the development of high throughput technologies for the quantitative characterization of References Benemann. 3(12). (2009). (1987). the recovery and use of energy. substituting for lignocellulosic materials derived subsequent use of the biomass residues rich in nitrogen and from forestry resources. Biologically active compounds from microalgae. carbohydrates could be recycled into pulp and paper which involves the extraction of only fuel lipids and the streams. and the development of genetic engineering the formation of more than 400. A. (2006). McHugh. and carbohydrates is not cost-effective. 1994). the issue of scale enters in. Metting. FEMS Microbiological Review. J. As was mentioned above. Microalgae products and production: An overview. microalgal metabolites.. microalgal is possible to revert to the most simple option (Option 5). M. including sugars and complex Production of 1 billion gallons of biodiesel will result in carbohydrates. M. Microbiological Sciences.biodieselmagazine. Datta. Banaigs. (2007). W. (57). E. 173-180. Tsai. Sommerfeld. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science (Netherlands). Microalgae as sources of fine chemicals.A.W. Wright.000 tons of glycerol (http:// tools to improve yields of desired products. Crouch. (1986). D.R. Suppl. (2008). A. Kawaguchi H.com/article. M. Agronomic uses of seaweed and microalgae. carbohydrates.Kadirgan.e. genomics. Kamm. (2003). (1986). polysaccharides for use as emulsifiers in food and industrial non-fuel lipids. this option will also require and potentially growing. L. Jarvis. SPB Academic Publishing.. M. with saturated. R. I.H. Zimmerman. Recent Patents on Biotechnology. (1990). The Plant Journal.R. J. (2008).J. Bonsignore. and Conditioner In case none of the above mentioned four options are It may also be possible to extract microalgal economical. K. Recovery (Extraction) of Fuel Lipids Only. Abou-Mansour.L. Hashimoto. Miyamoto. Pyne. including www. (2001). (8). 621-63. Borowitzka. (91). Kamm. Posewitz. The Hague.P. Science Publishers. Journal of Biosciences Bioengineering. (16). K. A guide to the seaweed industry. Hirata. if desired. Enzyme Microbial Technology. As the current production levels for biodiesel (700 million gallons in 2008) already has the market for glycerol Option 5. Forro. Once again. Marine cyanobacteria – A prolific source of natural products. Seibert. S. (1990). Journal of Industrial Microbiology.C. with special focus on Dunaliella sp.J..

Sanders. U. G. (82). Co-products   .. R. Schwarz. 263-270. (71). B. (77). (2005). A. Steinbüchel. (2006). Roy. Joannis-Cassan.Y. Scott. 85-90. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology. Banerjee. 93-98. S. (20). 68 7. N. Gross.. Franssen. W. P. Accumulation of poly-b-hydroxybutyrate in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp. T. Algal diversity and commercial algal products. H. Toonen. (2007). Spolaore. (25). Kadirgan. Kate. V. B.Mooibroek. Commercial applications of algae: Opportunities and Constraints. Journal of Electrochemical Society. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Singh.. 213-219. M. Q. (76). Shen. Radmer. Velikodvorskaya.. A. 233-247. (18). O. I. Philip. Duran. W. Olaizola. 73-95. Zerlov. 46(4). Isambert.C. (2007).D.N. 587-597. (1994). Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: From the test tube to the marketplace. Gonzalez.J. Radmer.J. (2004). Parker. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. BioScience.. 723-730. (2001). Giuseppin.Y. Biomolecular Engineering. (2003). Industrial bioconversion of renewable resources as an alternative to conventional chemistry. Oosterhuis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol. (1996). G. J.F. Current Opinion Biotechnology. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: A path to economic liability for the biofuels industry. Yildiz. E. Berezina. Wu. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 459-466. (2007). Assessment of technological options and economical feasibility for cyanophycin biopolymer and high-value amino acid production. C. Commercial applications of microalgae. Vorlop. Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: An overview... M. R. Bacterial acetone and butanol production by industrial fermentation in the Soviet Union: Use of hydrolyzed agricultural waste for biorefinery.. Willke..C.V. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Biodegradable polymers with a range of applications. S. Keshavarz. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. (65). 131-142. PCC6803. Z.. R. E. (141). 257-267. M. Pulz. (66). (1994). 87-96. G. (2006). S. 101(2). Journal of Applied Phycology. F. H. (6). Yazdani. Wu.Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Bioresource Technology.H. 635-648..A.H.S. (2004). K. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. O. T.

Some of these fuels are to be sited. other distribution aspects pipelining. 2009. container dimensions. diesel. As a variety of fuel rate of algae decomposition (Rieper-Kirchner. storage. rails. within the context of from algal biomass. In turn. fuel intermediates. transport. It is conceivable that these “bio-crudes” Lowering costs associated with the delivery of raw will be compatible with current pipeline and tanker biomass. be transported to the refinery. infrastructure concerns. including algae. and end-use vehicles). conforming to existing standards (e. and • Third. similar to plant lipids may be possibly taken into pipelines. It is also known that temperature and storage material have important • Maximizing the substrate energy-density and stability. biodiesel. high capacity. In all cases. These have been challenging issues appear to be more compatible with the existing petroleum for lignocellulosic feedstocks (Hess et al. In the context of a variety of culturing and syngas. and different fuels from algae are being considered.. the stability of the algal biomass under different decision points. for ideal lipid compositions.8. fuels intermediates. products – ethanol. and hydroreformed biofuels – are being considered harvesting conditions differing in salinity. Ethanol. it is difficult to predict how utilization challenges associated with each of these possible these factors will influence biomass storage and opportunities is discussed. production. 8. depending on whether it will be dewatered/ • Optimizing the scale of operations to the parameters densified biomass and/or fuel intermediates that are to stated above. biodiesel. with some evidence suggesting scalability. The optimal Technologies). 1990). Efstathiou and Credeur. 1986). few studies exist that While the demonstration flights mitigate some address outstanding issues of storing. Distribution and Utilization Distribution and utilization are challenges associated with It is also anticipated that gasoline and diesel range fuels virtually all biofuels. However. account for the storage of algae lipids (Hu et al. delivery vehicles. and jet fuels are all possible products for energy-inputs and costs. fuel intermediates. renewable transport method(s) should be analyzed and optimized gasoline. storage tanks. and transport scenarios is these logistics through end-use issues influence siting. remain poorly studied: Being intermediate steps in the supply chain. and final fuels biomass. 2009). transporting. and the ultimate economics and operations of that natural bacterial communities increase the an integrated algal biofuels refinery. have been shown biofuels as well. and final fuels from the systems. which carries infrastructure costs can be lowered in four ways: implications for the producers of algae and selection • Minimizing transport distance between process units. an issue that impacts oleaginous microalgae feedstocks is that the transport and storage mechanisms 8..g. dispensing equipment. such as cultivation and harvesting. biofuels. distribution and utilization need to be discussed in the context of earlier • First. biofuels oils (Miyashita and Takagi. hazardous Distribution is complicated by the fact that several materials and associated human health impacts. blending. Distribution and Utilization  69 . and the quality of the final fuel product. and completely compatible with the existing liquid transportation fuel infrastructure. and bioproducts. • Maximizing compatibility with existing infrastructure 1995). and dispensing algal concerning algal biomass. pyrolysis oil.. as corrosivity) for trucks.1 Distribution of algal lipid intermediates have not yet been established. the specific distribution and dewatering levels. Specifically. Thus. higher alcohols. 2009) and infrastructure. it is known that the presence feedstock production center to the ultimate consumer of unsaturated fatty acids causes auto-oxidation of are common goals for all biofuels. to be compatible for use in select demonstration flights (Buckman and Backs. • Second. Although the biofuel product(s) from algae will not require significant distribution system from algal biomass would ideally be energy-dense modifications during or after processing in the refinery.g. biogas.. combusting. Each of these different fuels has where the algae production and biorefinery facilities different implications for distributions. and barges is critical discussed in detail in Chapter 6 (Algal Biofuel Conversion to minimizing infrastructure impacts. jet-fuel blends from a variety can be expected to influence the economics of algal of oil-rich feedstocks. poorly characterized. pH and from algal biomass resources. implications for biodiesel stability (Bondioli et al. materials and temperature considerations (e. 2008).

Ethanol is another likely fuel from algae. With over Typically, compliance with specifications promulgated by
10 billion gallons per year produced and consumed organizations such as ASTM International ensures that a
domestically, distribution-related issues for ethanol has fuel is fit for purpose (ASTM International, 2009a, 2009b,
been studied for some time, and algal ethanol can benefit 2009c, 2009d, and 2009e). Failure of a fuel to comply with
from these analyses. While not as energy dense as purely even one of the many allowable property ranges within
petroleum-derived fuels, ethanol is an important fuel the prevailing specifications can lead to severe problems
oxygenate that can be used in regular passenger vehicles in the field. Some notable examples included: elastomer-
and special flex-fuel vehicles at up to 10% and 85% gasohol compatibility issues that led to fuel-system leaks when
blends, respectively. However, considerable infrastructure blending of ethanol with gasoline was initiated; cold-
investments need to be made for higher ethanol blends weather performance problems that crippled fleets when
to become even more attractive and widespread. One blending biodiesel with diesel was initiated in Minnesota
issue is that ethanol is not considered a fungible fuel; it in the winter; and prohibiting or limiting the use of the
can pick up excessive water associated with petroleum oxygenated gasoline additive MTBE in 25 states because
products in the pipeline and during storage, which causes it has contaminated drinking-water supplies (McCarthy
a phase separation when blended with gasoline (Wakeley and Tiemann, 2000). In addition to meeting fuel standard
et al., 2008). One possible way to address this is to build specifications, algal biofuels, as with all transportation
dedicated ethanol pipelines; however, at an estimated fuels, must meet Environmental Protection Agency
cost of $1 million/mile of pipeline, this approach is not regulations on combustion engine emissions.
generally considered to be economically viable (Reyold,
2000). Another possibility is to distribute ethanol blends by As is true of any new fuel, it is unlikely that new
rail, barge, and/or trucks. Trucking is currently the primary specifications will be developed for algal fuels in the near
mode to transport ethanol blends at an estimated rate of term (i.e., at least not until significant market penetration
$0.15/ton/kilometer (Morrow et al., 2006). This amount is has occurred); hence, producers of algal fuels should
a static number for low levels of ethanol in the blends (5% strive to meet prevailing petroleum-fuel specifications.
to 15%); as the ethanol content in the blend increases, the Nevertheless, research and technology advancements
transport costs will also increase due to the lower energy may one day yield optimized conversion processes which
density of the fuel. can deliver algae-derived compounds with improved
performance, handling, and environmental characteristics
8.2 Utilization relative to their petroleum-derived hydrocarbon
counterparts. If significant benefits can be demonstrated,
new specifications can be developed (e.g., ASTM D6751
The last remaining hurdle to creating a marketable new
and D7467).
fuel after it has been successfully delivered to the refueling
location is that the fuel must meet regulatory and customer
requirements. As mentioned in Chapter 6, such a fuel is The discussion below is divided into separate sections that
said to be “fit for purpose.” Many physical and chemical deal with algal blendstocks to replace gasoline-boiling-
properties are important in determining whether a fuel is fit range and middle-distillate-range petroleum products,
for purpose; some of these are energy density, oxidative and respectively. These classifications were selected because
biological stability, lubricity, cold-weather performance, the compounds comprising them are largely distinct and
elastomer compatibility, corrosivity, emissions (regulated non-overlapping. Within each of these classifications,
and unregulated), viscosity, distillation curve, ignition hydrocarbon compounds and oxygenated compounds are
quality, flash point, low-temperature heat release, metal treated separately, since their production processes and in-
content, odor/taste thresholds, water tolerance, specific use characteristics are generally different.
heat, latent heat, toxicity, environmental fate, and sulfur
and phosphorus content. Petroleum refiners have shown Algal Blendstocks to Replace
remarkable flexibility in producing fit-for-purpose fuels
Middle-Distillate Petroleum Products
from feedstocks ranging from light crude to heavy crude,
oil shales, tar sands, gasified coal, and chicken fat, and are Petroleum “middle distillates” are typically used to create
thus key stakeholders in reducing the uncertainty about the diesel and jet fuels. The primary algae-derived blendstocks
suitability of algal lipids and carbohydrates as a feedstock that are suitable for use in this product range are biodiesel
for fuel production. (oxygenated molecules) and renewable diesel (hydrocarbon
molecules). The known and anticipated end-use problem
areas for each are briefly surveyed below.

70 8. Distribution and Utilization 

Oxygenates: Biodiesel isomerized (i.e., transformed from straight- to branched-
chain paraffins), renewable diesel and SPK will have
Biodiesel is defined as “mono-alkyl esters of long
cold-weather performance problems comparable to those
chain fatty acids derived from vegetable oils or animal
experienced with biodiesel. Also, as was the case with algal
fats” (ASTM International, 2009b). Biodiesel has been
biodiesel, contaminants and end-product variability are
demonstrated to be a viable fuel for compression-ignition
concerns.
engines, both when used as a blend with petroleum-derived
diesel and when used in its neat form (i.e., 100% esters)
(Graboski and McCormick, 1998). The primary end-use Algal Blendstocks for Alcohol and
issues for plant-derived biodiesel are: lower oxidative Gasoline-Range Petroleum Products
stability than petroleum diesel, higher emissions of nitrogen
oxides (NOx), and cold-weather performance problems While much of the attention paid to algae is focused on
(Knothe, 2007). The oxidative-stability and cold-weather producing lipids and the subsequent conversion of the lipids
performance issues of biodiesel preclude it from use as a to diesel-range blending components (discussed above),
jet fuel. The anticipated issues with algae-derived biodiesel algae are already capable of producing alcohol (ethanol)
are similar, with added potential difficulties including: directly, and there are several other potential gasoline-range
1) contamination of the esters with chlorophyll, metals, products that could be produced by algae-based technology/
toxins, or catalyst poisons (e.g., sulfur and phosphorus) biorefineries. Petroleum products in the alcohols and
from the algal biomass and/or growth medium; 2) undesired gasoline range provide the major volume of fuels used by
performance effects due to different chemical compositions; transportation vehicles and small combustion engines in
and 3) end-product variability. the United States. Ethanol or butanol are the most common
biofuels currently being considered for use in gasoline,
and these alcohols can be produced from fermentation of
Hydrocarbons: Renewable Diesel and starches and other carbohydrates contained in algae.
Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene
The hydrocarbon analog to biodiesel is renewable diesel,
which is a non-oxygenated, paraffinic fuel produced Additionally, the hydro-treating of bio-derived fats or
by hydrotreating bio-derived fats or oils in a refinery oils in a refinery will typically yield a modest amount of
(Aatola et al., 2009). Algal lipids can be used to produce gasoline-boiling-range hydrocarbon molecules. Refiners
renewable diesel or synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK), refer to this material as “hydro-cracked naphtha.” This
a blendstock for jet fuel. These blendstocks do not have naphtha tends to have a very low blending octane and
oxidative-stability problems as severe as those of biodiesel, would normally be “reformed” in a catalytic reformer
and renewable diesel actually tends to decrease engine- within the refinery to increase its blending octane value
out NOx emissions. Nevertheless, unless they are heavily prior to use in a gasoline blend.

8. Distribution and Utilization  71

References
Aatola, H., Larmi, M., Sarjovaara, T., and Mikkonen, S. (2009). Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) as a renewable diesel fuel: Trade-off
between NOx particulate emission and fuel consumption of a heavy duty engine. SAE International Journal of Engines. 1(1), 1251-
1262.
ASTM International. (2009a). Standard specification for diesel fuel oils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available online
at http://www.astm.org/Standards/D975.htm
ASTM International. (2009b). Standard specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. West Conshohocken,
PA: ASTM International. Available online at http://astm.org/Standards/D6751.htm
ASTM International. (2009c). Standard specification for aviation turbine fuels. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available
online at http://astm.org/Standards/D1655.htm
ASTM International. (2009d). Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM
International. Available online at http://www.astm.org./Standards/D4814.htm
ASTM International. (2009e). Standard specification for diesel fuel oil, biodiesel blend (B6 to B20). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM
International. Available online at http://astm.org/Standards/D7467.htm
Bondioli, P., Gasparoli, A., Lanzani, A., Fedeli, E., Veronese, S., and Sala, M. (1995). Storage stability of biodiesel. Journal of the
American Oil Chemists’ Society.72(6), 699-702.
Buckman, R. (2009). Boeing backs biofuels. Retrieved October 26, 2009, from Forbes.com at
http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/17/biofuels-biodiesel-boeing-intelligent-technology-biofuels.html
Efstathiou, J. and Credeur, M.J. (2009). Algae-powered jet proves biofuel in continental test (update 2). Retrieved October, 23, 2009 from
Bloomberg.com at http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=ayiWn9Z4EwIM
Frega, N., Mozzon, M. and Lercker, G. (1999). Effects of free fatty acids on oxidative stability of vegetable oil. Journal of the American
Oil Chemists’ Society. 76(3), 325-329.
Graboski, M.S. and McCormick, R.L. (1998). Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived Fuels in diesel engines. Progress in Energy and
Combustion Science. 24(2), 125-164.
Hess, J., Kenney, K., Wright, C., Perlack, R., and Turhollow, A. (2009). Corn stover availability for biomass conversion: Situation analysis.
Cellulose. 16(4), 599-619.
Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M., Seibert, M., and Darzins, A. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for
biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. The Plant Journal. 54(4), 621-639.
Knothe, G. (2007). Some aspects of biodiesel oxidative stability. Fuel Processing Technology. 88(7), 669-677.
McCarthy, J.E. and Tiemann, M. (2000). MTBE in gasoline: Clean air and drinking water issues. Washington, D.C.: Congressional
Research Service, The Library of Congress. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/fuels/mtbe/crsrtc.pdf
Miyashita, K. and Takagi, T. (1986). Study on the oxidative rate and prooxidant activity of free fatty acids. Journal of the American Oil
Chemists’ Society. 63(10), 1380-1384.
Morrow, W.R., Griffin, W.M., and Matthews, H.S. (2006). Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United
States. Environmental Science & Technology. 40(9), 2877-2886.
Reyold, R. (2000). The current fuel ethanol industry transportation, marketing, distribution and technical considerations. Bremen, IN:
Downstream Alternatives, Inc. Available online at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents/111/4788.pdf
Rieper-Kirchner, M. (1990). Macroalgal decomposition: Laboratory studies with particular regard to microorganisms and meiofauna.
Helgoland Marine Research. 44(3), 397-410.
Wakeley, H.L., Griffin, W.M., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H.S. (2008). Alternative transportation fuels: Distribution infrastructure for
hydrogen and ethanol in Iowa. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 14(3), 262-271.

72 8. Distribution and Utilization 

treatment and necessary technical improvements for co-producing algal biofuels are described. and land.1 Resource Requirements for production. transportation fuel needs and displacing petroleum use.. In addition to coastal and inland photoautotrophic the challenges associated with coupling industrial microalgae production.S. and land Sourcing of suitable organic carbon feedstock.. the siting and resource factors (e. availability. concepts are also being proposed. The sustainability and environmental impacts biofuel could be supported if sufficiently high algae of national algae production capacity build-up and productivities could be achieved affordably at scale. facilities design. labor. microalgae to significantly contribute to meeting U. 1990). and other inputs required for siting and operating industrial Heterotrophic microalgae production bioreactor-based algae production and post-processing to fuels and other co-products Availability of suitable coastal and off-shore marine site loca- Photoautotrophic macroalgae production tions 9. sourcing of nutrients from both the input wastewater Additional resources include materials. 1998). as with any biomass-based technology and industry. Assessments of resource requirements and availability and other nutrients—must be appropriately aligned in for large-scale. For each parameter. Sufficient land. CO2.g. This scenario Exhibit 9. This chapter provides an overview of the issues associated with site location and key resources for various microalgae Exhibit 9. Similarly. These parameters with wastewater treatment and industrial sources of are of greatest importance to siting. 1985. needs to be analyzed from a site location. water. Maxwell et al. To achieve success regarding both Program (Sheehan et al. concentrated CO2. Photoautotrophic Microalgae Approach sustainable water resources. and conditions of the particular algae species being cultivated CO2 resources were identified at the time to suggest and the engineered growth systems being developed and that the production of billions of gallons of algal deployed. to couple land-based microalgae biomass production water. and costs. a for algal biofuel production. off-shore marine environment CO2 sources with algae production are outlined. focusing primarily on technical and economic performance without adverse the Southwest and southern tier of the United States environmental impacts. the major resource and environmental parameters that Further.2 provides a simple high-level overview of and macroalgae production approaches (Exhibit 9. nutrients. land-based photoautotrophic microalgal terms of their geo-location.. both of which influence siting decisions production efficiency.. Resources and Siting The development and scale-up of algal biofuels 9. and from possible nutrient recycling from residual and other inputs associated with facilities infrastructure algal biomass. CO2. other nutrients. Integration with wastewater variety of conditions may be more or less cost-effective treatment can play an additional important role in the for the siting and operation of algal biomass production. Lansford et al. water.9.1). must also be appropriately matched to the required growth Feinberg et al. 1990. energy. energy. water. capital. as Different Cultivation Approaches well as from a resource availability and use perspective. The status of algae-based wastewater and conducting operations and maintenance. an in-depth discussion is included on the potential pertain to the algae biofuels production inputs of climate. Resources and Siting   73 . characteristics. required Photoautotrophic microalgae production energy inputs. supplemental CO2 supply. operation over time will be important complementary Many of the findings of these earlier assessments still aspects of the siting and resources issues that will also apply today and the potential remains for biofuels need careful consideration and analysis using tools and other co-products derived from photoautotrophic and methodologies discussed later in chapter 10.. Critical requirements—such as suitable land and climate.1 Key resource issues for different algae systems ALGAE PRODUCTION APPROACH KEY RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS Climate. cultivation were conducted during the Aquatic Species and affordability.

2006a). biomass feedstock supply for the downstream value chain. and lignocellulosic conceptually include the equivalence of land and biomass.3). taking into largely associated with the upstream supply of organic consideration factors such as the scale of farms required carbon feedstock derived from commodity crops. Heterotrophic and includes siting and resource issues that are closely photoautotrophic approaches to microalgae production coupled with the production. Achieving affordable scale-up and has the greatest feedstock scale-up potential and is being successful commercial expansion using the heterotrophic pursued and reported elsewhere through bioenergy approach relies on the cost-effective availability of organic programs under DOE and Department of Agriculture carbon feedstock—a resource that ultimately links back to (USDA. This a photosynthetic origin (Exhibit 9. after sufficient scale-up of production and demand. The latter throughout the country.. Resources and Siting   . and from the hydrolysis of starch grain crops can. and land-based ponds. Climate CO2 Nutrients Nutrient Recycle Liquid and Gasous Fuels Processing Algal Harvesting and Production Conversion Secondary Products Water Land Climate Water Land Resources and Insolation Location Topograghy Enviromental Temperature Supply/ Demand Use/ Cover Exhibit 9.. have different siting and resource input implications and pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass feedstock and thus present synergistic integration opportunities. thereby sharing many of the same feedstock culture facilities with off-shore areas and structures. in terms of cultivation and harvesting.g. 2005). Use of sugars from cane. DOE. Perlack et al. whereas photoautotrophic Photoautotrophic Macroalgae Approach production. an industrial operation with a significant upstream logistics trail associated with the sourcing of the needed biomass- derived input feedstocks. selected to meet production needs. other sugar crops. supply logistics.2 to off-shore macroalgae production. similar conceptual extension holds for the application of Exhibit 9. 1985) can be represented by extension of Exhibit 9. The preferred source of sugars production is based on the use of organic carbon feedstock and other appropriate organic carbon feedstocks for in the form of sugars or other relatively simple organic greatest sustainable scale-up potential and avoidance of compounds instead of photosynthesis. is more Options for siting macroalgae (also known as seaweed akin to agriculture and serves as the point of origin for the or kelp) biomass production include offshore farms. beets. near-shore coastal farms. cost and availability of space 74 9.2 to organic carbon-rich waste streams. 2005. The Resource issues for the heterotrophic approach are more merits of each should be carefully evaluated. that is expected to be capable of national scale-up to Heterotrophic production can be characterized as more of over one billion tons annually (Perlack et al.. The algae are adverse food/feed market impacts would be based on cultivated in the dark in closed industrial bioreactors the use of carbon-rich waste streams and the successful that could potentially be established in many locations deconstruction of lignocellulosic materials. e. A supply issues with first.2 Key siting and resource Parameters Evaporation Salinity Ownership elements for algae biofuel production Severe Storms Allocation Soils Geology (Adapted from Maxwell et al.. lead to the Heterotrophic Microalgae Approach problem of linking biofuel production with competing Heterotrophic microalgae biomass and metabolite food and feed markets. availability.and second-generation biofuels.

2004) factors include solar radiation. Resources and Siting   75 . will most directly metric tonnes for food products). As illustrated in Exhibit 9. precipitation. other Water Treatment Deconstruction . rivers Biomass Harvesting or Other Non-Fresh Waters Lignin Dewatering Extraction & CHP Seperation High-Density Algal Biomass FHarvesting Exhibit 9. Heterotrophic algae production A major challenge lies in finding and developing new in closed industrial bioreactor systems utilize mature environments and cultivation approaches that will support bioreactor technology that can provide relatively clean production of macroalgae at the larger scales and lower and protected environmental control needed to optimize costs needed to supply the biofuels market. technology development. Ligno-Cellulosic N.4. Closed photobioreactors technologies to facilitate the cultivation of macroalgae.. K.4 million dry sunlight. Closed heterotrophic bioreactor Climate systems are decoupled from the variable ambient Sunlight and Temperature Needs outdoor climate.closed PBRs . and competition production. would need to be greatly expanded for biofuels. and severe weather will affect water supply and water quality in open systems. and day/night light and temperature cycles. research.ag CAFO Low-Density Algal . The co-siting of macroalgal farms with microalgae production. and severe weather.other industrial . has also been proposed as a way of leveraging other evaporation. both seasonally and annually. P.hybrid mix Nutrient-Rich Water. open photoautotrophic systems that typically achieve no more than about 1 gram per liter culture density. Temperature and availability of (annual global production of about 1. and favorable regulatory Heterotrophic algal cultures can be one to two orders of framework for coastal and offshore environment use could magnitude higher in biomass density than possible with help enable cultivation at scales to meet production goals. the level of production affect productivity.3 High-level Oil Feedstock illustration of heterotrophic Biomass Residue and photoautotrophic Sugars and Other Heterotropic algae approaches to microalgal Organic Carbon production in Fuels biomass and biofuels Feedstock closed bioreactors production Co-Products and nutrients. temperature. environmental impacts. the heterotrophic approach can 9. weather conditions.lake. Additional growth conditions for higher biomass density cultures. evaporation. From a resource use perspective. This is done at the expense of Various climate elements affect photoautotrophic algae 9. key other structures such as windfarms (Buck et al. whereas precipitation.muni WWT & Seperation .open ponds CO2 . particularly in the case of land-based with other uses. are less sensitive to climate variability than open ponds Based on the scale of macroalgae cultivation practices due to the more controlled environment that closed currently being used to meet non-fuel product demand systems can provide.power plants . Synergistic Project Intergration Opportunities Ligno-Cellulosic Autotrophic CO2 Sourceess Plant Material algae production .2 Resources Overview reduce both water and energy-use intensity in the algae production operation.

but the availability of adequate sunlight and the from southeast Texas to northwest Florida is attributed suitability of climate and temperature are key siting and to the lower annual average solar insolation available. productivity in large-scale deployed systems could only be taken as a gross indicator. The more to total biomass growth.high-cost systems. Storm and ocean of these annual average climate criteria with what dynamics affecting waves. For the case of sun hours ≥ 2800. and Florida being most promising). and annual average freeze-free days ≥ 200. environment provides a buffer that moderates temperature variation. with the higher growth regions northern latitude states. the availability of non. controls. A significant portion Laboratory (PNNL) using higher GIS resolution and of the United States is suitable for algae production more information-rich climate and meteorological data. from the standpoint of having adequate solar radiation Projections of annual average algae biomass production (with parts of Hawaii. Equally important for photoautotrophic microalgae growth however. This could fresh water. and the availability of concentrated sources include situations where co-location of inland microalgae of CO2. These results should be considered simply conducted by Sandia National Laboratories. i. and marine nutrient might actually be achieved with annual average algae transport cause additional impacts on productivity. and ≥ 200 freeze-free days region 76 9. and the New England states. the lack of attractiveness of the Gulf Coast region States. with the major climate element affecting algal It was recognized from the outset that the correlation growth being the availability of sunlight. resource conditions for algae production.4 presents some simple GIS-based scoping solar insolation. lower elevation sites. would have southern tier states showing greatest productivity potential very low productivity in the winter months. In Exhibit 9. identifying preferred regions of the United States for photoautotrophic microalgae production based on Additional factors could conceivably overcome what the application of selected filter criteria on annual might otherwise appear to be uneconomical site and average climate conditions.. Wisconsin. the ocean or sea ≥ 55°F.4 Rough scoping assessment of preferred site locations for outdoor algae production a) Regions with annual average climate conditions meeting b) Fossil-fired power plant sources of CO2 within 20 miles of selected criteria: ≥ 2800 hour annual sunshine. Within that context.4 algae is technically feasible in many parts of the United (a). including Minnesota. whereas PNNL study suggests projected productivities in this region could be relatively high.e. resource factors that will determine economic feasibility. Arizona. This is likely due to Preferred Geographic Regions for Algae Production more moderate annual average temperatures despite lower Exhibit 9.4 and the Michigan. and enclosures requiring geographical regions were: annual average cumulative energy input for environmental control. but suggest was to provide a preliminary high-level assessment preference for lower latitude. having gross qualitative similarity to Exhibit 9. from the PNNL study show clear patterns relating climate Texas. Growth of based on the modeling assumptions used. the results are suggestive and consistent with with both open and closed cultivation systems is the the more recent assessment by Pacific Northwest National availability of abundant sunlight. California. annual average daily temperature offshore marine macroalgae production. The goal indicative at this point rather than predictive. Resources and Siting   . currents. New Mexico. The climate criteria used to narrow down the production at higher latitudes might be possible with Exhibit 9. annual municipal wastewater facilities in the preferred climate average temperature ≥ 55˚ F.

and currents that can cause the lower elevation regions of the lower latitude states disruption or damage to physical structures and operations. Evaporation. algal culture can potentially average productivities in more geographically diverse utilize non-fresh water sources having few competing 9. and hurricanes pose serious concerns in the inland regions of the central states. such as heavy rain and flooding. and coastal areas. for closed reactors. would Severe Weather Events and Elements provide greater flexibility and could extend otherwise Severe weather events. High annual production closely coupled with climate and will increase water for a given species grown photoautotrophically outdoors. integrated with co-located industries providing synergistic particularly extremes in temperature. killing frost in the fall. require a more refined biomass productivity and oil content yield. Areas with relatively long growing prospects for algae production in both inland and coastal seasons (for example. both high and low. Areas with higher annual average and. precipitation (more than 40 inches). Discovery and development of algae species capable of increased General Water Balance and Management Needs productivity under wider ranges of light and temperature One of the major benefits of growing algae is that. Offshore marine algae insolation and average daily temperatures above the lower production will be subject to severe weather impacts threshold needed for economically viable growth) are in the form of wind. limited periods of commercially viable algae production. the A thorough evaluation of evaporative water loss is conventional crop analog is the greenhouse and the limiting needed to assess water requirements. implications for energy and cost needed to maintain internal temperature sustainable production scale-up. unlike conditions can also potentially lead to increased annual most terrestrial agriculture. although evaporative cooling is often viable growing season(s) for the particular strains of algae considered as a means to reduce culture temperature. Resources and Siting   77 . It is encouraging that researchers today power for cost-effective environmental control of the algae are not only concerned with finding algae with high cultivation. This would. Evaporative however. Florida. Other local to materials and usually demands both the use of higher climate and weather conditions will also have influence. throughout the seasons. The marine environment can also be highly corrosive Texas. discussed later in this section.. the Northwest. and the Southeast. Availability and rotation of Evaporative water loss is discussed in a later subsection. events can contaminate an open system environment or which have major influence on the hours and intensity cause physical damage to both open and closed systems. with more than 60 inches annually. The southwestern states (California. cooling in the summer. however. and parts of Louisiana. requirements for an open algae growth system. different algal species capable of good productivity in cold season and hot season conditions. These weather length of growing season are latitude and elevation. is a wide range of temperatures. and overall economics. waves. opportunities for utilizing waste heat and energy. of Hawaii. Arizona. dust storms. will require that suitable climatic conditions loss can be a critical factor to consider when choosing exist for a major part of the year (Maxwell et al. 1985). 240 days or more of adequate solar regions of the United States. Evaporation is a Therefore. Georgia. The primary geographical location factors for determining Southwest. Thorough analysis (preferably on a state-by-state basis) with detailed data is needed to assess areas most suitable Water for algae production based on this climate factor. Seasonal Considerations are desirable for algae production from the standpoint Various species of microalgae have potential for biofuel of long-term availability and sustainability of water feedstock production and are capable of growing under supply. a critical climate issue for both open and closed less important concern for selecting locations of closed photobioreactor systems is the length of economically photobioreactors.industrial operations capable of providing excess heat and locations. For outdoor ponds. represented by specific regions of Hawaii. Arizona. Precipitation affects water availability (both surface it should also establish minimum economically feasible and groundwater) at a given location within a given operational requirement values for heating in the winter watershed region. tornadoes. and New the conventional crop analogy for this is the length of time Mexico) and Hawaii have the highest evaporation rates between the last killing frost in the spring and the first in the United States. quality and more costly materials and greater maintenance. Such analyses should include assessment of the monthly or Water Requirements seasonal solar radiation and ambient temperature ranges. locations for open pond production. available for productive cultivation. of available sunlight per day and the daily and seasonal and need to be taken into account when looking at temperature variations. hail storms. and California. respectively. For closed photobioreactors. but also with analysis for systems that would likely be closed and highly algae that grow well under severe climate conditions. New Mexico. Southeast.

2009). and locally available water over 400 billion gallons per day. 2008. Kenny et al.. and the future expansion of fresh water salinity build-up. were for thermoelectric-power generation. 2009). or “co. modeling. 1995). ).000 acre-feet carbon feedstock production needing to be part of the per year (Kenny et al. Kokya et al. are important areas supply and management in the future (USGS. water demand over the 30 years prior to that. Growing demand for limited will change with evaporative water loss.S.. Whether or not this is a problem for sustainable billion gallons per day in 1980. management. 2009). various locations throughout the eastern half of the country... Hutchison et use. which also tend to be in the more arid and higher solar resource regions like the Southwest. periodic addition conservation and by the increased re-use of wastewater. Hightower et al. and 37% of all freshwater withdrawals A significant source of water demand with inland algae (Kenny et al. to cool electricity-generating equipment. Total withdrawals since algal industry scale-up will depend on the geographic the mid-1980s have remained relatively flat at slightly location. and coal-bed the past 25 years. with water use in upstream organic million gallons per day (Mgal/d). 2002). natural gas. and operational costs. total combined production operations could be for the replacement of water fresh and saline water withdrawals more than doubled continuously lost to evaporation from open cultivation from about 180 billion gallons per day in 1950 to over 400 systems. Implementing water desalination would impose additional The stress on fresh water supplies in the United States is capital. depending on the chemistry. Almost all saline water. USGS. 2006b. In 2005.. Irrigation withdrawals represented 31% of all water al. such as saline and brackish ground water. 2003. Oroud.000 ambient temperature variations. solar insolation. At the national scale. This will be of greatest impact and concern in being fresh (Hutson et al. hybrid combination).). climate conditions. thereby changing fresh water supplies in support of development and the culture conditions. Scoping Out Water Requirements for Algae Production Analysis of U. 2002. humidity. different dominant algae species and growth conditions. from both a resource perspective could have major effect on all sectors of water resources and an algal cultivation perspective. about 95%. humidity. Saline water (seawater and heterotrophic assessment.000 heterotrophic). or from desalination operations. 2006b. Many of the nations’ fresh ground water aquifers are under up. 1978. 2009). Open algal ponds may from the desalination of saline or brackish water sources have to periodically be drained and re-filled. representing etc. and 95% loss in open systems will be the degree of salinity of the of all saline-water withdrawals in 2005. Resources and Siting   . 61% of all surface water. and field assessment. or 460. wind.. or highly adaptive algae that can thrive supplies for non-agricultural use must increasingly come under widely varying conditions. The relatively flat national water withdrawal trend over produced water” from oil.. population increase has thus far been offset by increased down of ponds after salinity build-up. for future research. Water balance and supply from precipitation (DOE. 2009). or staged as a and from the treatment and reuse of wastewater. However. following the more than doubling of methane wells (Reynolds. Disposal of high not restricted to the more arid western half of the country. energy. is used by microalgae (open vs. Kenny et al. Water use will also depend on brackish coastal water) withdrawals were about 15% of the type of growth systems used for photoautotrophic the total. closed vs. the application of desalination treatment to control increasing stress. 2008.S. the thermoelectric-power industry in the coastal states whether evaporative cooling is used for closed systems.. 1999. can also become an environmental problem for inland where a growing number of counties are experiencing locations. withdrawals (201. Hightower et al. Some salt byproducts may have commercial net fresh water withdrawals that exceed the sustainable value. Water Supply and Management Water use and consumption for algae-based biofuels will Total combined fresh and saline water withdrawals in the depend on the cultivation approach (photoautotrophic/ United States as of the year 2005 were estimated at 410.uses. salt content effluent or solid byproducts. withdrawals. 2004. for irrigation of crops and other lands totaled 128. from pond but is also becoming a local and regional concern at drainage and replacement. reflects for open pond systems in more arid environments with the fact that fresh water sources in the Untied States are high rates of evaporation. nearly and the site-specific details of climate. Also a complicating factor for evaporative water 41% of all freshwater. Climate change is also recognized as a factor that management issues. elevation. one-half of the total U. water-sparse locations. Mao. solar insolation. with the majority (85%) resources..000 Mgal/d) and weather conditions (cloud cover. This will require periodic blow. along with associated salt build-up and 2008. Mgal/d and were the second-largest category of water and wind conditions (Al-Shammiri. salinity and water chemistry approaching full allocation. A rough upper bound estimate of evaporative water loss 78 9. Withdrawals water used for cultivation and the local latitude. of non-saline make-up water to dilute the salinity build. all of cascading sequence of increasingly saline ponds each with which have increasing energy demand implications (DOE.

warrants aquifers located closer to the surface and nearer to the closer attention and assessment to better understand and cultivation site would provide a more cost-effective source refine water resource requirements.. If less water quality and chemistry. and of greater investment. Gerbens-Leenes et al. physical and chemical characteristics. 2004). Developing and Mapping Water Resources for Algae Production The evaporative loss estimates from the notional scenarios When considering the water resources needed for the provide an indication of the potential magnitude of the future development and expansion of algal biofuel issue.. quantity. monitored. brackish average algal biomass and oil productivities of nearly and saline groundwater resources in terms of their extent. Resources and Siting   79 .. 31 g/m2 per day with 50% dry weight oil content. 1984) to large area scale-up of algae cultivation (DOE. saline.. 2006b. and residential development needs in high growth rate Water must be considered a key element of life cycle water-sparse regions like the Southwest (Clark. Suitable overall input supply needs and consumption. 2009). 2008). 1993. by state engineers and water authorities. The maps of saline groundwater 9. the estimated capacity. There is considerable in the United States are areas of investigation in need untapped potential for utilizing brackish. the use of non-fresh water sources will need open horizontal pan evaporation data (Farnsworth et to be emphasized in the face of the growing competition al. depth. Hightower et al. 1985). discussed be an over-estimate of what can be expected under later in this chapter. experimental scale-up scenario study in preparation for the National investigation. addition to coastal and possible off-shore areas. where brackish or saline groundwater supplies may be The most optimistic production scenario was for the both ample and unused or underutilized. and sustainable withdrawal optimistic productivities are assumed. The location.S. Unfortunately. held in December 2008. 2007. as noted earlier. depending on systems and process specifics. and chemical characterization of saline aquifers range of site locations and conditions. Shuttleworth. algal cultivation through harvesting and post-processing particularly deeper aquifers that are largely unregulated into fuels and other products will also be important. Open bodies of productively using non-fresh wastewater resources brackish and saline water will usually experience less for renewable fuels.7). and recycling nutrients. The notional scale-up scenarios and assumptions made are discussed later in this chapter (see Exhibit 9. Saline groundwater resources.. additional water will be used and increasing interest and potential competition for access as consumed. Dennehy. has the potential benefits of actual operating conditions in the field. 2009).with open systems was done as part of a hypothetical co-produced water. resource development. and may well also be saved. and were based on simply applying fresh water production. other inland could be a consequence of open system operation parts of the country can be targeted for algae production in the more arid and sunny regions of the country. define the spatial distribution. depth information determines the cost of drilling and operating In summary. or several hundreds of non-fresh water over a range of salinities means that. southwestern United States. Additional analysis. and field trials at larger scales of operation are Algae Roadmap Workshop. NAS. integrating algae pan evaporation data will be worst-case and will likely production with wastewater treatment. The evaporation estimates suggest that water loss on the order of several tens of gallons of water per kilogram The unique ability of many species of algae to grow in of dry weight biomass produced. which assumed annual quantitative information remains limited on U. 2007. and a source of water for treatment and use to meet commercial recycled. An improved knowledge base is needed to better evaporative water loss intensities will be greater. analysis for algal biofuels. limited fresh water supplies. the effects of their extraction on the environment (Alley. Woolhiser and demands on limited sustainable fresh water supplies et al. systems are implemented. 1982a and 1982b. Water requirements of water for algae production than deeper sources located information will not be well characterized until larger scale longer distances from the cultivation site. water utilization for algal biomass and (including energy input requirements for pumping) a downstream production of biofuels. and sustainable withdrawal rates Evaporative water loss associated with algae cultivation for these non-fresh ground water resources. needed to understand how best to leverage these resources. and to predict can be significantly reduced if closed systems are used. Evaluation of water use for the overall value chain from 2003. reclaimed. in gallons of water per gallon of algal biofuel produced. as with other forms of Depth to groundwater is pertinent to the economics of bioenergy (NAS. both in terms of well in a given location (Maxwell et al. are also of Along the way. putting less additional demand on evaporative loss than fresh water. reducing eutrophication of natural water bodies. and evaluated under a depth. Extrapolations based on fresh water From a resource use standpoint. with open systems. Along with geological data.

2002). Applications fuel-fired power plants. transport. aquifers. Photoautotrophic algae will only utilize products derived from the algae biomass. typically output a steady 1. 2009. 2004). 2009). Dennehy. scale of algae production. 2008 and 2009). if these aquifers are spread over the greenhouse gas emissions offset will be limited to an large geographic areas. but a significant effort will still be needed to et al. The CO2 generated by the power (Shannon. sustainability of supply. The Carbon Capture Opportunity in Algae Production Efficient algae production requires enriched sources of CO2 The distance for pumping flue gas to algae cultivation since the rate of supply from the atmosphere is limited by systems will become a limiting factor that requires diffusion rates through the surface resistance of the water capture and concentration of CO2 from the flue gas for in the cultivation system. and details of reduce fossil fuel consumption. NATCARB. Larger coal-fired base-load generators that locate. and coal bed methane be captured and used affordably for algae production wells is another closely related and underutilized water will be limited by the operational logistics and resource that can range in quality from nearly fresh efficiencies. 2006). spatial extent. detailed analysis is difficult estimated 20% to 30% of the total power plant emissions and often lacking. and the matching of CO2 source availability energy input than the output energy displacement value with algal cultivation facilities. using coal) represents over 40% of the total. Data on small. algae production does possible broader use for carbon capture and storage (CCS) not actually sequester fossil carbon.200 acres of algae cultivation resource availability and suitability for economic uses area (Brune et al. gas abatement credits would come from the substitution The rate of effective CO2 uptake will also vary with of renewable fuels and other co-products that displace or the algae species.. A limited plant can only be effectively used by the algae during amount of this information is available for major the photosynthetically active sunlight hours. content. More detailed and up-to-date 2 billion metric tons per year (EIA. it will be necessary to provide a CO2 source that is suitably free of materials potentially toxic to algae. description of substances toxic to algal growth) and the local availability and distance to suitable land for algae 80 9. and of CO2 emitted annually in the United States (EPA. the utilization of fossil carbon emissions and complement are already in operation today and under consideration for subsurface sequestration. collect. addition. including Exhibit 9.resources are based on incomplete data that was largely EIA. local aquifers may be due to CO2 off-gassing during non-sunlight hours and the available through state agencies and private engineering unavoidable parasitic losses of algae production (Brune companies.. including natural Algae production could provide excellent opportunities for gas treatment plants and ammonia production facilities. USGS. potential As an example. As a result. 2005. The geographical location. In represented by the algae biofuels and other co-products. longer distance transport and distribution. and distribution could require more production. Resources and Siting   . identify. at some large growth system and incident light conditions. 2008 and 2009). and quality production to fully utilize the CO2 in the flue gas emitted (chemical components and characteristics) are important from a 50-MWe semi-base load natural-gas-fired power information for assessing non-fresh groundwater aquifer plant would require about 2. and analyze this information. and the availability of land and water to hyper-saline (Reynolds 2003. 2008) characterization of the CO2 emissions stream (e. 2008). including algae production. recharge rate.. separating CO2 in large industrial plants. a recent analysis suggests that for algae yield. would be a good source of CO2. depth. or more than 1965. biomass growth rate.5. Any greenhouse CO2 during daylight hours when photosynthesis is active. is not a simple issue. represent over half of the more than 6 billion metric tons rates and quantities of CO2 produced. The sources shown (NATCARB. Likely Stationary CO2 Emission Sources Major stationary CO2 emission sources that could An inventory of stationary industrial CO2 sources in potentially be used for algae production are shown in the more promising regions of the country. information is needed to improve our understanding of this resource in support of algae production siting Barriers to Viable CO2 Capture and Utilization analyses (Dennehy.g. Campbell carbon capture and reuse in the form of fuels and other et al. for algae cultivation scale-up within reasonable geographic proximity of stationary sources. Produced The degree to which stationary CO2 emissions can water from petroleum. In addition.. 2004. Therefore. Flue gas. However. such as from fossil. but rather provides in response to climate change (Rubin.000 to 2500 MWe of power would each require many tens of thousands of acres of Carbon Dioxide algae production and large volumes of water to provide a similar effective offset of 20% to 30% of the CO2 emitted. natural gas. parasitic losses from flue gas the requirements for CO2 supply to enhance algae treatment. Power generation alone (mainly developed by the USGS prior to the mid-1960s (Feth. However. 2008b). 2009).

This of land for algae production (i.276. Exhibit (USDA. algae production siting and CO2 sourcing. such as topography and soil.9 173 Total 3. and purchase requirements. which means that environmental assessments and/ Exhibit 9. as will be discussed further in chapter 10. any given region unless other factors drive the investment in expanding the nation’s CO2 pipeline infrastructure. Topography would be a limiting factor for these because either open or closed systems will require systems because the installation of large shallow ponds relatively large areas for implementation. 9. Resources and Siting   81 .6.5) within practical transport distances of suitable algae and relatively barren desert land.g..production. and political factors. target annual average biomass production of 30 to 60 g/m2 per day with 30% to 50% Land ownership information provides valuable insights neutral lipid content on a dry weight basis).5 Major stationary CO2 sources in the United States (NATCARB. Hundreds of millions of acres of relatively low- the limited quantity of CO2 that would likely be available productivity.1 4. 2008a) CO2 EMISSIONS CATEGORY NUMBER OF SOURCES (Million Metric Ton/Year) Ag Processing 6. lease. oil feedstock. such systems on which policies and stakeholders could affect project would require in the range of roughly 800 to 2600 acres of development. Even slope could well be eliminated from consideration due to at levels of photoautotrophic microalgae biomass and oil the high cost that would be required for site productivity that would stretch the limits of an aggressive preparation and leveling. For example. affect the construction costs and design Factors for Evaluating Land for Algal Production of open systems by virtue of the need for pond lining or Land availability will be important for algae production sealing.9 665 Other 3.. Areas with more than 5% with any photosynthesis-based biomass feedstock.702. Physical characteristics. One outcome economic.5 3.3 140 Cement Plants 86. lower-value land exists in the United States from stationary industrial point sources (e. is needed for making refined assessments for Land availability is influenced by various physical. and particularly their porosity and permeability Land characteristics. Publicly and privately owned lands are algae culture surface area to produce 10 million gallons of subject to variable use.g. could limit the land available for open pond algae farming. For a realistic appraisal production sites in a given geographical region. land that would be both can be expected to constrain the extent to which algal suitable and potentially available for siting algae production biofuels production can be affordably scaled up within facilities). much of the land in the West is government owned. several characteristics need to be considered.. 2006 and 2009). legal. as illustrated in of a hypothetical algae production scale-up scenario is Exhibit 9.2 475 Gas Processing Refineries/Chemical 196.796 9. Soils.0 13 Industrial 141.3 163 Fertilizer 7. grassland.002 Ethanol Plants 41.6 53 Petroleum and Natural 90. including pasture.3 112 Electricity Generation 2. social. R&D program (e.e. as is expected requires relatively flat terrain.

. the potential remains for high algae biomass production relative to more conventional Further. algae productivity crops. Depending on the algae strain and culture system approach used. 1985 ) 82 9.60 g/m2 per day. 1985)... Land that is highly desirable for development and other set-asides for publically beneficial reasons may Typography Land Ownership Current Land Value Systems Engineering All Physically Politically Land Suitable Affordable Available Available Parcels Land Land Land Land Enviromental Restrictions Current Land Use Legislation Water and and Regualtions Climate Resources Exhibit 9. as with any form of biomass. the cost of land is during hotter ambient conditions. can represent and impose political and regulatory Despite the practical upper limits that will naturally exist constraints on land availability (Maxwell et al. (chapter 10). Optimizing light utilization in algae production projections for biofuel feedstock of 30 . but currently reflect lower biomass fact that algal cells nearest the illuminated surface absorb productivities in the range of 10 . than real. Resources and Siting   . This the light and shade their neighbors farther from the light is significantly lower than the more optimistic target source. Loss mechanisms that often not considered or is relatively small compared to other capital cost. systems includes the challenge of managing dissipative However. given that large-scale algae biomass production The result will be theoretical and practical upper limits on intended for bioenergy feedstock does not yet exist.6 Factors and process steps for evaluating and constraining the available and appropriately suitable land for algae production (Adapted from Maxwell et al. such systems have not been optimized for energy losses that occur when incident photons that cannot higher-volume.20 g/m2 per day. system structures. By improving productivity under colder ambient conditions. It must be stressed that “potential” will be constrained by the available energy density algal biomass and bio-oil production projections at in sunlight and the relatively low efficiencies of commercial scale currently remain hypothetical rather photosynthetic processes coupled with other systems losses. the amount of biomass growth that can be achieved per unit Relatively large-scale commercial algae production of illuminated surface (Weyer et al. the dissipative heat loading Land Availability Constraints can be a benefit in moderating culture temperatures and Land use and land value affect land affordability.or environmental impact statements could be required restrict the fraction of incident photon flux that can be as part of the approval process. lower-value production with algal strains otherwise be effectively captured and used by the algae developed and improved over time to be more suitable and in photosynthesis are instead converted to thermal (heat) productive for biofuel feedstock rather than those used energy in the culture media and surrounding cultivation for today’s high-value algae biomass product markets. Indian reservations also effectively used to drive photosynthesis ultimately places comprise a significant portion of this land. 2009). for algae productivity. Land ownership practical upper limits on the biomass productivity. reviewing the more recent economic analyses for algae or can lead to overheating and loss of productivity biomass and projected oil production. Contributing to with open ponds for high-value products can serve as a productivity limits per unit of illuminated surface area is the baseline reference.

Dedicated biomass production the United States are insufficient to support large-scale facilities will also require wastewater treatment and algae production on the basis of a single use of nutrients. Examples of this type of constraint include technologies. particularly in the eastern half of the deployed in the near-term and provides workforce country.. which are and processing could be made up with wastewater used to dispose of wastewater or brines. for additional rounds of algae production. nutrients from treatment. phosphorus. The same applies to land highly suited for higher-value agricultural POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ALGAE PRODUCTION use. biofuels industry are discussed in this subsection.4 Integration with Water conventional wastewater treatment Treatment Facilities • Lower energy intensity than conventional wastewater treatment (a greenhouse gas benefit) Inevitably. monuments. Nutrient which produce algal biomass as a consequence of the recycling would be needed since wastewater flows in wastewater treatment. The imported wastewater Wastewater Treatment and would be treated as part of the algae production. metals. nutrient recycling.not be seen as suitable for algae production. • Imported wastewater provides nutrients and water to make-up inevitable losses. The availability and sustainability of water supplies • Wastewater treatment revenue that in the West will also be a key consideration. in suitable climates. Supply and cost of nutrients (nitrogen. treatment has the following advantages: and other historical sites. some land • Early opportunity to develop large-scale cover characteristics could present excellent opportunities algae production infrastructure for algae farming. dairy and feedlot operations located throughout the • Algae-based wastewater treatment can be United States. synthetic organic compounds. Sensitive environmental or cultural land constraints Although algae-based wastewater treatment requires will also reduce the overall land availability (Maxwell many times more land area than mechanical treatment et al. represent potential co-location sites for algae training and experience in large-scale algae operations where nutrient-rich wastewater could be cultivation that would translate to future dedicated used for algae production. phosphorus. offsets algae production costs • Lower capital and O&M costs than 9. On the other hand. The roles of nutrients. A subset of wastewater treatment Inevitable nutrients losses during algae production facilities consist of evaporation facilities. Land cover categories such as barren and scrubland cover a large portion of the West and may • Development of skilled algae production workforce provide an area free from other food-based agriculture • Potential for nutrient recycling at algae where algae growth systems could be sited (Maxwell et al. 1985).g. archaeological sites. excess nutrients (e.. Resources and Siting   83 . which can also help supplement and off-set these facility types in the development of an algae the cost of commercial fertilizers for algae production. as noted earlier. with the main purpose of by algae and then recycled from the oil extraction residuals biomass production.. Beyond economics. Two main types of algae production facility are wastewater (municipal and agricultural) would be captured envisioned: dedicated facilities. organic matter. and potassium). or other CO2-emitting industry operations The main connections of algae production and • Potential to treat agricultural drainage wastewater treatment are the following: and eutrophic water bodies • Treatment technology is needed to recycle nutrients and water from algae biofuel processing residuals for use in algae production. this also avoids the perception WITH WASTEWATER TREATMENT and potential conflict of food and feed production versus fuel. biomass production facilities 1985). and potassium) be a key issue for achieving affordable and Algae can be useful in the treatment of waters polluted with sustainable scale-up of algae biofuels production. wildlife areas. algae-based parks. help provide nutrient removal service in the wastewater For large-scale algae biofuel production. Recycling Applications • Algae-based wastewater treatment provides a needed Municipal wastewater treatment facilities and agricultural service. and wastewater treatment facilities. nitrogen. wastewater treatment and recycling • Potential to be integrated with power plant must be incorporated with algae biofuel production. and the algae production can algae feedstock production facilities. 9.

rivers. harvesting is a 2002). Ponds for more advanced compounds such as human hormones and antibiotics treatment. This nutrients (e. if the nutrients and carbon at algae production facilities will be nutrient-rich algae are then also removed from the water.. food processing). Thus. eventually unlikely when wastewater contaminants are present. Mechanical treatment technologies typically hold either high rate ponds (~30 cm) or algal turf scrubbers the wastewater for less than 12 hours.. but high productivity is not crucial to the (Borde et al. to oxidize waste organic matter (Exhibit 9.and potentially endocrine disrupting compounds (Oswald. 2009. The bioaccumulation of trace contaminants in high-value products (>$100/kg biomass). lakes. have yet to be demonstrated consistently chemical flocculation processes (bioflocculation and for ponds. organic nutrients.. For example. which is the leading water treatment technology and wastewaters mainly contaminated with inorganic used in the United States (Downing et al. These highly productive systems use shallow reactors. provides a Organic-rich wastewaters usually also contain nutrients. the is illustrated schematically in Exhibit 9. Borde et al.g. High rates of algae production lead to high rates crucial step in wastewater treatment systems. 1998. Maintenance of lipid-rich strains. Aksu.g. Algae are similar to in conjunction with wastewater treatment. at least in terms of maximizing air flotation units or sedimentation clarifiers. 1988. Kohn et al.g. confined animal facilities). including nutrient removal. and lakes). practical opportunity to install algae production facilities requiring two types of treatment. the major types to build and to operate than conventional mechanical of wastewaters available for combined algae production treatment facilities.10 .. recycling of concentrations is useful in wastewater treatment. The treatment goals of these facilities (removal of organic removal of trace contaminants (e. which is algae that would occur in the receiving waters. needed if algae are to make a substantial contribution to Less well-known are the ability of algal systems to provide national biofuel production. 2009). autoflocculation) are far less costly. 2007). The cost biomass production.7).. Despite a seeming of algae to assimilate dissolved nutrients down to trace abundance of wastewater and waste nutrients. As noted above. and naturally occurring organic catalysts (Sinton et al. natural disinfection and remove trace contaminants. The great depths contribute to low algae organic compounds such as phenol and acetonitrile productivity.7. followed by algae separation in dissolved treatment are aligned. might be prevented to a 84 9..$0. 2008) is high for biofuel production. cost savings. high-productivity algae and water treatment are those contaminated with organic ponds have a total cost that is about 70% less than activated matter and nutrients (e. organic agricultural mechanisms of wastewater treatment by algae. dissolved oxygen. endocrine disrupting matter and pathogens only). the method is chemical addition to achieve coagulation and objectives of biofuel feedstock production and wastewater flocculation. The standard of nutrient removal and wastewater treatment. Non- production.17 per m3 treated) or manipulation of culture conditions to promote lipid (Maglion.g. productivities (as does biofuels feedstock production). coupled with the tremendous need for expanded and improved wastewater treatment in the United Treatment of Organic Wastewaters for Algae Production States (EPA.. and rivers). These reactions are also the best-known industrial (e. importation of wastes and/or wastewater will still be Disinfection is promoted via the production of oxygen needed in dedicated algae biomass production facilities radicals in the presence of sunlight. As with other algae production systems. 2008) and throughout the world.g. 2002. municipal and industrial sources) sludge. 2003. Even with internal recycling.. 2005). to make up for nutrient losses (Brune et al. need high algae from animal facilities) is an area in need of study.. harming higher organisms. Woertz et al. but research is needed to improve the reliability of these processes (as Algae-based treatment facilities are typically less expensive discussed in chapter 4).. Existing interaction of algae and bacteria in wastewater cultures algae-based treatment facilities use relatively deep leads to degradation of a wide variety of synthetic ponds (1-6 m). of chemical addition ($0. including wastewater treatment ponds. The ability agricultural drainage. The (e.g. The major plants in that they both produce oxygen and assimilate classes of wastewaters to be treated are municipal. agricultural drainage. which will be a benefit as Wastewater Treatment Plants long as the resulting metals concentrations in the algae biomass are not excessive or inhibitive for later use in Integration of algae production with wastewater treatment the processing of fuel and other co-products. Finally. Closed photobioreactors are not emphasized technologies hold the wastewater for at least several days in this wastewater treatment discussion since they are and in an environment similar to many natural receiving likely to be economical only when also producing waters. Muñoz et al. Resources and Siting   .. Heavy metals may be removed Algae Production Techniques for by adsorption to algal cells. whereas pond (~1 cm). 2002).. and eutrophic waters dissolved oxygen algae release is used by treatment bacteria with low organic content but high nutrient content (e...

Exhibit 9. Resources and Siting   85 . High Rate Clarifier Clarifier Pond Raw Sewage Treated Effluent Sludge CO2 Digestor Generator kWh Food Algae Biomass Production Inputs Option Liquid Biofuel Products Reclaimed Water Fuels Fertilizer To Fertilizer b) Simplified conceptual system block diagram 9.7 Integration of algae production with wastewater treatment for nutrient removal and biomass production: Sun CO2 Reclaimed Algae Water CO2 N P Waste CO2 O2 N Biomass Water P Organics Bacteria a) Basic principles of operation.

Treatment of agricultural drainage with on large-scale development. 9. such as bioflocculation. production in order for this type of co-location to be widely commercialized. micro-screening.g.. etc. It is important to point out that amongst the numerous barriers to co-location of algal cultivation facilities with High rate ponds might be used as components of industrial CO2 sources identified at the Workshop and evaporation systems needed to dispose of blow-down subsequent discussions with electric utilities..5 Co-location of Algal nutrient. as follows: • Large-scale (3-5 acre) demonstration of CO2- enhanced high rate ponds for nutrient removal • Determine CO2 biofixation efficiency 86 9. Furthermore. mine drainage. contaminating the algal biomass likely would remain in the waste from biofuel processing. any heavy metals autoflocculation. Resources and Siting   . waters is likely to occur in more rural settings than and additional input sought from managers at major treatment of municipal wastewaters. al. The high rate ponds could create theme was that electric utilities primarily view algae an algal product while performing the service of water cultivation as a means of CO2 capture as opposed to a evaporation. The topics wastewaters. potentially increasing • Demonstrate recycling of biofuel processing the cost of waste disposal or recycling. hazards to wildlife from toxic compounds (e.. calls. Mulbry et al. 2008. market from decomposition of organic matter would not be drivers.great extend by pond treatment followed by algae • Determine growth model parameters harvesting. chromium) must be carefully evaluated. regulatory Successful use of high rate ponds specifically for and economic) for algae facilities that are co-located nutrient removal/recycling requires resolution with electric utilities and other industrial CO2 sources. CO2-Emitting Industries Agricultural drainage and eutrophic water bodies (e.. Treatment of Inorganic Wastewaters for Algae Production In addition to the ability of algae systems to treat organic-rich wastewaters.g. very different business models and goals for algae selenium. Thus. integration opportunities and challenges. Calif.. routes of such contamination should be • Determine the cost savings and greenhouse gas studied and preventative measures developed. As with any evaporation pond technology companies and fuel refiners/distributers with system. low-organic content wastewaters will expand Cultivation Facilities with the opportunities for algae production systems. of several issues. research efforts and policy evaluations would likely need to focus on Main Research Needs for Algae both carbon capture and the production of biofuels and Production with Wastewater co-products to overcome barriers (technical. desired absorption is essential since inorganic carbon generation outcomes. However. 2002). and potential algal turf scrubbers without CO2-addition and high opportunities for the federal government. co-products. their ability to treat high.. Salton Sea. needed to confirm this. dispose of agricultural drainage. The processing of the algal biomass for fuel • Develop algae grazer control strategies and other co-products would presumably destroy and • Develop reliable low-cost algae harvesting neutralize the contaminants. For all biofuel wastes for algae production feedstocks. CO2 addition or slow atmospheric of discussion included the value proposition. 2004).) are examples of such waters This section includes findings from discussions held at the (Benemann et al. technical and market challenges. but further investigation is techniques. oil field produced electric utilities may need to partner with algae cultivation/ water. constraints significant. Evaporation ponds are currently used to method for producing biofuels and co-products. and included For algae-based treatment of low-organic content several large municipal electric utilities. Treatment of nutrient-rich National Algal Roadmap Workshop break-out sessions. etc. (GHG) emissions avoidance benefits compared to conventional wastewater treatment technologies. 1996. These follow-on efforts were coordinated with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Findings from rate ponds with CO2 addition has been demonstrated in these interviews and conference calls were integrated California’s Central Valley and elsewhere (Craggs et with the Workshop inputs in developing this section. Lundquist et al. potentially leading electric utilities through later meetings and conference to greater land availability and savings in land costs. an overriding or other wastewater.

The regulatory implications transport. Co-location of algal cultivation with industrial available. cement manufacturing. which can transportation fuels may not rigorously be considered bring some advantage in terms of efficiency of capture.S. conditioning. Offset of fossil fuel conditions on or near a year-round basis. etc. However. consumption by algae biofuel and other co-products must be done with approaches that provide a net GHG emissions • Excess wastewater or cooling water may be reduction. but from an emissions control an aspect that could be incorporated into engineering perspective. in that the carbon will be require proportionally larger algae production systems re-released to the atmosphere when algal-derived per unit energy produced and higher costs per unit energy fuels are combusted. fermentation-based industries. Also. Resulting costs for • Excess heat or power may be available to provide CO2 will be site-specific and dependent on methods of heating or cooling for improved thermal capture. Thus. would also emit CO2 distributed across the southern tier states provide during periods of darkness when it cannot be utilized by ample sources for algal growth on a large scale. Gas-fired the majority of CO2 emissions from stationary baseload generators would not be intermittent. carbon sequestration. Resources and Siting   87 .6%). This will industries (e.15%) than natural gas plants (5 . coal-fired plant flue gas typically expected to result in a net reduction of overall GHG has about a factor of two greater CO2 concentration emissions. plants – overcoming a primary resource challenge for algae cultivation at scale.5. and delivery of CO2 from the power plant to of this will need to be addressed before utilities the algae cultivation site. some absorption and re-use as transportation geothermal power production. depending on the type of plant and fuel used. beneficial re-use of cooling water and wastewater. generators will have intermittent operation that would A variety of stationary industrial sources of CO2 introduce intermittency in the supply of CO2 for algae are distributed throughout the United States. the algae through photosynthesis. 2005). and distance of transport to algae management of algae cultivation systems – this cultivation sites. but economic viability under a broader range of geographic and climate must be determined case by case. Costs are expected to be lower than for will allow developing algal cultivation facilities pure commercially supplied CO2. the process of capturing flue-gas CO2 to make (10 . fossil fuel require establishing a U. gas-fired power plants and fuel companies are likely to widely adopt algal that operate as peaking plants rather than base-load cultivation co-located with industrial CO2 sources. introduced earlier in Exhibit on the phasing of the intermittency with respect to the 9. While algae biofuels can be produced. using algae to capture the maximum of CO2 absorption by algae in any carbon-credit or amount of CO2 emissions from coal-fired plants would cap and trade framework. policy on carbon extraction/refining. construction of algae systems at natural models described in more detail in the Systems and gas-fired power plants may be a better investment. The emissions from fuel in lieu of permanent sequestration.. but. as sources. During those times. the CO2 would be emitted to the atmosphere if not captured and sequestered by other means (Rubin. The growth. 9. while providing While the information in this section focuses on fossil. The impact on algae production would depend quantitative breakdown. found often in proximity of power CO2 sources is a promising area for further research. many of these facilities have higher CO2 concentrations compared to power plant flue gas. shows that fossil-fired power plants represent daylight hours when photosynthesis is active. The Techno-Economic Assessment section of this report.g. reason is that coal-fired power plants have higher CO2 emissions per unit energy produced than natural gas-fired An important policy question to consider is the value power plants. fired power plants. which typically ranges from about 5% to about 15%. it is also relevant to other CO2-intensive • Potential carbon credit for utilities. concentrated • Abundant quantities of concentrated CO2 available sources flue gas from fossil-fuel burning power plants from stationary industrial sources can supplement and other CO2-emitting industrial sources can be low concentration CO2 from the atmosphere.). A number of large coal-burning power plants with baseload coal-fired plants. beneficially used in algae production. This higher concentration would affect Coal-fired power plants may be a convenient source of the sizing and operations of algae production facilities— CO2 for algae production.The Opportunity in Co-Locating with CO2-Emitting Sources ADVANTAGES OF CO-LOCATION OF Since photoautotropic algae growth requires CO2. and ALGAE PRODUCTION WITH STATIONARY productivity can be enhanced by supplementing the INDUSTRIAL CO2 SOURCES limited CO2 available from the atmosphere.

as well as policy-development • Land availability: Suitable and affordable vacant land efforts.. and other participants coordinated plants. not in the fuels business and regulated public utility in most cases there will not be a complementary commissions will be constrained in entering the fuel nutrient (N. stationary industrial sources as a supplement to enhance wastewater treatment facilities. universities. will be required for commercialization of may not be available adjacent to or near major algal cultivation facilities co-located with industrial power plants CO2 sources and/or wastewater treatment facilities. include: ▪▪ Technology evaluation at larger scales ▪▪ Determination of algae production facility model parameters 88 9.Barriers to Co-Location of Algae • Maintaining cultivation facilities during utility outages Production with Stationary Industrial and through seasonal changes in algal growth rates: Detailed models will be needed to develop and evaluate CO2 Sources approaches for managing the variable nature of both • Need for nutrient sources: While stationary industrial CO2 emissions and algal growth rates/CO2 uptake. the uncertainty may pose a barrier for wide commercial Directions for Research and Development adoption of the technology. etc. and new business models will be needed to • Unclear regulatory framework for carbon-capture commercialize this approach. ethanol plants or other and optimize algae production will not be “free”.). Their fundamental objective will be brought in from other sources. and agricultural • Too much CO2 near plants for realistic absorption: drainage/water body restoration sites that also represent Large power plants release too much CO2 to a range geographical locations. and be absorbed by algal ponds at a realistic scale climate conditions. mechanisms to encourage partnering CO2 sources and nutrient sources such as wastewater between utilities and algae/fuel companies will be treatment facilities and agricultural waste streams. Thus. stationary industrial sources of CO2 (cement refiners. • Establish national algae biomass production test-beds 2009). Also. algal technology companies. CO2 emitting industry facilities. ethanol plants. CO2 is only at the national level. Current plant cooling and algae pond heating) estimates are that approximately 20% . ▪▪ Techno-economic analyses • Capital costs and operational costs: There exists a ▪▪ Life Cycle Analysis and GHG abatement analysis need to evaluate capital costs and parasitic operational ▪▪ National inventory of potential production sites losses (and costs) for infrastructure and power required ▪▪ Evaluation of economies of scale vs. to conduct research at the pilot scale (3 . sources of concentrated CO2 can potentially provide • Resistance from electric utilities: Electric utilities are ample carbon for photosynthesis-driven algal growth. Therefore nutrients must be production arena. P. The use of flue gas to cultivate algae will involve non-point source emissions at ground level. or in some cases algal to capture CO2 as opposed to producing biofuels and cultivation could be co-located with both stationary co-products. required.30% of a power plant’s greenhouse gas emissions can be offset ▪▪ Development of efficient test-bed facilities by algae biofuel and protein production (Brune et al. etc. The same generally holds true for other cultivation companies. Specific test-bed R&D absorbed during periods when sunlight is available topics relevant to power and wastewater utilities and photosynthesis is active in the algae. the capture and delivery of concentrated CO2 from The test-beds would ideally be located at power plants. These costs and losses must be parasitic losses of CO2 transport. K) supply. minimized and compared to other approaches for the ▪▪ Evaluation of temperature control (power capture and sequestration or reuse of carbon. Several areas for research. solar resource.10 acres). distributors. Although often referred to as a “free” resource. This effort could involve a likely to be possible near the power plant consortium of R&D organizations. algal facility. • Emissions from ponds are at ground level: Regulatory The following directions have been identified: requirements from power plants and other stationary • Develop computer models of algae production sources are governed by the Clean Air Act. credits: Until there are regulations in place that quantify carbon credits from algal growth facilities. advantages to capture and deliver industrial CO2 to ponds and of decentralized production considering grow/harvest algae. Resources and Siting   . and facilities that will aid the following: are based upon point-source emissions from high ▪▪ Rapid and consistent engineering design elevations.

and processing and algal cultivation/technology companies prior to fuel extraction. and refiners/distributors. crop fertilization. Resources and Siting   89 . flocculation harvesting. pathogen safety • Develop and train the future algae production/algae ▪▪ Beneficial management of residuals for soil carbon biomass processing workforce at the national test-bed development. SOx. between public utilities/other industrial CO2 sources ▪▪ Algal biomass handling. and other sites. salinity and blowdown • Evaluate policies that would encourage partnering management. etc. Develop university training programs. proteins: carbohydrates and C:N:P) ▪▪ Power plant cooling with treated wastewater in ▪▪ Methods of nutrient and water recycling within conjunction with algae production production facilities. ▪▪ Development of algal strains and their cultivation techniques 9. and absorption/biofixation efficiency emissions from ponds including plume modeling and algal biomass productivity given seasonal and and regulatory analysis diel variations in photosynthesis and various ▪▪ Effects of various flue gases on algae production water chemistries and co-product quality ▪▪ Control of algal biomass quality (ratios of lipids: ▪▪ Scrubbing of flue gas for NOx.▪▪ Flue gas or other industrial source CO2 supply ▪▪ Investigate the safety of ground-level flue gas logistics. storage. costs. etc.

Department of Energy (DOE). (DOE/EIA-0484). (2003). Thompson. H.S.References Aksu. Department of Energy. Sheehan. Tam (Eds. Naucler. Department of Energy. 117–125. DC.. and Oswald. Ku. O.pdf Department of Energy (DOE). Water Science and Technology. Washington. and Brune... (2003).. 8). 2009). (NOAA Technical Report NWS 34). B.pdf Downing.J. Berlin. Erbach.K. Al-Shammiri.L. Delgado. 6.Y. D. W. Evaporation rate as a function of water salinity.R. F. E. Buck. Cushman.doe. Washington.C. A controlled stream mesocosm for tertiary treatment of sewage. 95-122. J.R. B. and annual pan evaporation for the United States.. J. April 15). Available online at: http://www. (2009). R.gov/energy-water/docs/121- RptToCongress-EWwEIAcomments-FINAL... (1982). Campbell. Carbon capture & storage: Assessing the Economics.J.C. Brune. Synergistic relationships in algal- bacterial microcosms for the treatment of aromatic pollutants. Geological Survey. W. Alley.. 86(3). 45(1). 47. Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: The prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints.. and Rosenthal. Resources and Siting   .C. G.. 150. Hoskinson. J. Sokhansanj.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ Energy Information Administration (EIA). W.E.htm Craggs.sandia. U.. (1996). Emissions of greenhouse gases report.B. Tagore... and Thompson. DC.. H. Hess. Journal of Environmental Engineering. D. Lundquist. D.. W. 293-300. L..gov/biofuels/2005workshop/b2blowres63006. Turhollow. I.F. R. S.K.).J. Easterly. R. September). Human-related sources and sinks of carbon dioxide.eia. (DOE/ EIA-0573). B.. A. Water rush: Deep aquifers sought for metro growth.E. J.J.energy.gov/oiaf/ieo/emissions. J. Krause. The controlled eutrophication process: Using microalgae for CO2 utilization and agricultural fertilizer recycling. Van Olst. A.S. and Oswald. Benemann. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems® Technology and reverse osmosis... (2004). R. US Department of Energy. National perspective on saline aquifers. In Y-S Won & N. J.doe. H. Dennehy. seasonal. Bracco. (2002). and Benemann.L.orau. October. DC. US Department of energy Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Enery. Available online at: http://www. Springer-Verlag. Hettenhaus.. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2007. Patin.eia. Hatti-Kaul. 149-169. Adey.S.B.J. J.com/news/state/aph2orush02-11-09. (2008). Available online at: http://www. (2002). J. Lundquist.R. A. (USGS Fact Sheet 075-03).html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2008). In Water Desalination and Reuse Strategies for New Mexico.epa. M. Zubieta. J. M.abqjournal. Ecological Engineering. International energy outlook 2009 (chap. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: A joint research agenda. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). H. Washington. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2004 Report to Congress.. Denver. Department of Energy.J.gov/climatechange/emissions/CO2_human.N. and Ruijs. Available online at: www... Available online at: http://www. Energy demands on water resources: Report to congress on the interdependency of energy and water. Desalination of groundwater: Earth Science Perspective. Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Available online at at: www. Roadmap for agriculture biomass feedstock supply in the United States. T. and Wright.H. (DOE/SC-0095).S.J. Washington. Massingill. J. Mean monthly... Munoz.pdf. Jessup.R. DC.... McKinesey Climate Change Initiative.. Green. Japan. D. 90 9.. (2006b).R.L. 189-203. Environmental Protection Agency. Microalgal biomass for greenhouse gas reductions: Potential for replacement of fossil-fuels and animal feeds. Available online at: http://genomicsgtl. B. DC... Ocean Coastal Management.mckinsey. Foust. K. (1998). T.. (2007).F. (2006a). E. S. (2002). Biosorption of heavy metals by microalgae in batch and continuous systems..html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). W. X. Borde. Farnsworth. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Albuquerque Journal. Washginton..C.X. (2009. GHGT-6.. (February 11. Kyoto. (2004. Guieysse.com/clientservice/ccsi Clark. Bioresource Technology. R. Wastewater Treatment with Algae (37-54). Washington. 135(11). Washington. CO: U. J. DC. J. H. Available online at: http://www.gov/algae2008/breakouts/dennehy2004.. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute. T. and Mattiasson. 1136-1144. DC. D. Desalination. 2002. Inventory of U. Washington.Y. (2008). (2002).. Weissman.

In Borowitzka and Borowitzka (Eds. (Atlas HA-199).. Green. Ahmadzadeh B.Y. Borglin.usgs. (2004). Washington. Linsey. S. (2008).. L. Huang. (2003). CO. (DOE/GO-102005-2135. Lumia.K.. Photosynthetically oxygenated acetonitrile biodegradation by an algal- bacterial microcosm: A pilot-scale study. Water Science Technology. Fresno. M.000 parts per million dissolved solids.. J.S. (2005). C. OK. C. J. (SERI/TR- 215-2484). C. and Meyer. energy. McNeill.. Development of Drainage Treatment for the San Joaquin River Water Quality Improvement Project.P.. and research requirements. Barber. and Maupin M. (USGS Circular 1334). Hydrological Processes. Kondrad. Overview of energy-water interrdependencies and the emerging energy demands on water resources. R. Nature.. Denver. and Maupin. NATCARB (2008a). 261-265. UK. 4626-4632. E. McIntosh. and Donald C. 452. Lundquist. (SERI/SP-231-2550). California. Robert D.F. Kenny.. Grandbois. M. (2007). Los Alamos.gov/circ/1344/ Kohn. M and Pierce. and Kebede-Westhead.L. 51(12). U. Davidson. Mulbry.K. Golden.232-3820). Center of Advanced Materials for the Purification of Water with Systems.K.. A. NM. (2007). and Kokya. (Eds).. C. (2005).F. K. R. D. Modelling the water and salt balance in a shallow lake. Resources and Siting   91 . (SERI/TP. 211-235. (2004). S. Theoretical and Applied Climatology.A. The energy challenge: Commentary. Norman. (1986). and the environment.. 285-286. (1965). Feinberg. (1982). E. N. Kenny. O.. The National Academies Press. D. Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. K. Perlack. California Department of Water Resources. and de Coninck. Oroud... L. Graham. Cameron. K.. I... Turhollow..C.L. (OPEN-FILE REPORT 6-2003). Saline aquifer data http://www. Produced water and associated issues. (USGS Circular 1268).. Preliminary map of the conterminous United States showing depth to and quality of shallowest ground water containing more than 1. (1995).E. H. Bioresource Technology. de Connick. 4.S. Hutson. Guieysse.. 9. Thompson. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations. Environmental Science & Technology.... B.. Washington. National Academy of Sciences. Hsieh.. W.A. H. S. CO2 Source Map of US .L. D. 22. W. T.J. R. Hightower.html Neehan. ORNL/TM-2005/66). U. J.J. Hightower. Ecological Modelling.html NATCARB (2008b). Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005.G. potential. and Mattiasson.. E. Pizarro. Quinn. CO. 2005-2012. S. (SAND 2007-1349C).S. Cambridge University Press. Solar Energy Research Institute. and Terry. and Midgley.A. R.. Association with natural organic matter enhances the sunlight-mediated inactivation of MS2 coliphage by singlet oxygen. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Technical summary. Hill.W..S. Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: Algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers. B. Solar Energy Research Institute. Rolvering. M. J.C. (1978). (NOAA Technical Report NWS 33) Washington.L. and Oswald. Oswald. Lovelace. United States Geological Survey. Reynolds. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. T. M.E. 41(13). DC. Effects of salinity upon evaporation from pans and shallow lakes near the dead sea. K. K. Impact of chemistry on sustainable water with its nexus to the economy. Muñoz. (2008). Shannon. S. and Nelson.natcarb. (1988). Solar Energy Research Institute. R. (2006). (2008)..C.R. B. CO.S. Feinberg. Loos.. Maxwell. CO2 sources for microalgae-based liquid fuel production. Oklahoma Geological Survey. Resource evaluation and site selection for microalgae production systems. R. Fuels from microalgae: Technology status. A.. and Karpuk. Rubin. N. 231-240.. F. (1990). M. W.. E. 99.B. Golden.S. Robin L. D.natcarb.. Hutson. Proposing a formula for evaporation measurement from salt water resources. CO.. E. University of Illinois.G. Golden. Department of Energy.. Anthony F. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Kokya.). (2007). 8137-8142. Available online at: http://pubs. and Peck. Folger.T. and Einfeld.J.. Microalgal Biotechnology (chap.S.org/Atlas/data_files.. Hutchison. M. Linsey.H.Farnsworth. D. B. (2009). Meyer. I. 12). Erbach (2005). D.. Department of Agriculture. 52.L. Sandia National Laboratories.. In Metz. Wright. W.org/Atlas/data_files... S. Cambridge University Press. (1985). Stokes. Feth. Barber.CO2 sources were compiled by NATCARB http://www. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. Pate.M.. and Hogg. N. Bryce J. Lynn L. T.

. Shuttleworth. A. D. T. and Perlman..S.. BioEnergy Research. Lynch.S. USDA Economic Research Service. 110(2). (2009. U. Resources and Siting   . (Ed).ers.Sheehan.H. US Geological Survey. Solley. R. Produced Water Quality Map of US http://energy.J. Department of Agriculture (USDA).E. & Willson.J. CO. 135(11).W. (1993). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. McGraw-Hill. P.. P.htm U.M. and Arora.. J. T. Geological Survey Circular 1200). Pierce. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995. 246-250. A look back at the U.htm U. Mapping average daily pan evaporation. 1115-1122. 92 9. 1–10. Applied Environmental Microbiology.. (2002). Wang. (2009). Hall. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Evaporation.gov/prov/prodwat/dictionary. M. value. Geological Survey. (U. and Roessler. M.cr. B. R.S. Major uses of land in the United States. (USGS Circular 1331). Dunahay. Weyer..... D. Mintz. Handbook of Hydrology (chap.R. D. Land use. M.B. A. D.. 4). (2009).S. Golden..A. R. L.. (2006). and Nelson.gov/Briefing/LandUse/majorlandusechapter. Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters. Bush. K.. S.S. Woolhiser. (1998).C. (2002).A. (Economic Information Bulletin Number 14).R. Department of Energy’s aquatic species program--biodiesel from algae. Feffer. Geological Survey. and Wallace.A. Climate change and water resources management: A federal perspective.. and Davies-Colley. (2009).usgs. In Maidment. M. Lipid productivity of algae grown during treatment of dairy and municipal wastewaters. Woertz. (1998). 1993.S. W. Consumptive water use in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. 2002.usgs.. and management: Major uses of land. C. Sinton. D. Darzins. Argonne National Laboratory. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering.G. Journal of Environmental Engineering.usda. Wu. 68(3).S. Lundquist. H. (2009). (NREL/TP-580-24190). (ANL/ ESD/09-1). Theoretical Maximum Algal Oil Production. Y.). J.. Available online at: http://water. USDA Economic Research Service On-Line Briefing Room Available online at: http://www. (1984). W. Benemann.J.gov/watuse/pdf1995/html/ U. I.1122-1131.

and market conditions and constraints.Fractionation Phototrophic Mixotrophic Phototrophic Heterotrophic Phototrophic .g. tradeoffs among different technologies. can commercialization of the still relatively immature provide informed guidance for targeting investments in field of algal biofuels also requires the confidence and select technologies.. to an overall regional and marketing. environmental.Harvesting Systems . as illustrated in Exhibit 10. e. comparative yield and energy balance for different pathways • Assess economic impact of R&D strategies and 10. as discussed co-products industry requires the optimum combination of throughout the Roadmap. It can also help track performance and they can make necessary investments over time to reduce progress (technical. and deployment engagement of key public and private stakeholders so approaches. systems. e. systems. economic. infrastructural. significant investment is expected to be required to overcome the various technical and economic Exhibit 10. political. Enabling successful advancement and or national resource and supply chain assessment.Separation Hydrocarbons Consolidated Intermediate Lipids Carbohydrates Proteins & Alcohols* Biomass Constituents * Biologically produced in-situ by the organism Biochemical Thermochemical Direct Anaerobic Conversion Conversion Conversion Synthesis Digestion Processes Renewable End Use Fuels Biodiesel Alcohols Biogas Co-Products & Products Hydrocarbons 10.1 Objectives of investments. and quantitative modeling and analyses of systems and processes are needed that span different enterprise levels In short. objective successful commercialization.1). and processes.1 High level illustration of various approaches and pathways to developing algae-derived biofuelsand co-products ALGAE Species Unicellular Multicellular Selection & Cyanobacteria Microalgae Macroalgae Biology Open Terrestrial Closed Terrestrial Open Offshore Cultivation Systems Systems Systems System: Hybrid . comparative cost per Techno-Economic Analysis gallon of biofuel for different pathways Given the numerous potential approaches and pathways available for algae biofuels and co-products (as illustrated in Exhibit 10. techno-economic modeling and analysis can across the overall algae-to-biofuels supply chain. and environmental) critical technical risks and overcome challenges to developing to meeting performance objectives and reaching goals for an algal biofuels industry. Systems modeling and analyses technical innovations in systems and processes.Dewatering . Such serve a range of purposes and goals that include: analyses can provide improved understanding and insight to help guide successful industry development within the • Assess technical performance and cost/benefit real-world context of technical. coupled applied across this space and done at different levels of with economic feasibility in the practical implementation precision and granularity. ranging from individual unit and integrated scale-up for commercial production operations to an integrated enterprise. Toward this end.10.g. processes.. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis Successful development of an algae-based biofuels and challenges along each of these pathways. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  93 .2.

• Assess environmental impact of R&D strategies 10.2 TEA Scope and Methods
and investments, e.g., comparative net greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions per gallon of biofuel for Exhibit 10.3 illustrates at a high level the essential
different pathways elements of techno-economic modeling and analysis.
• Assess consequences and constraints of alternative These intersecting elements present a broad systems
pathways for algal feedstock, biofuels, and co- perspective that integrates the interdependent science
products industry build-up, e.g., land, water, CO2, and engineering aspects specific to developing algae
other nutrients, energy, and infrastructure. biofuels, keeping environmental, economic, and
policy aspects in view to provide critical insight
• Inform R&D and business development investment
and information needed for decision-support.
decisions
• Inform policy decisions and explore “what if” Techno-economic assessment for algae biofuels is
scenarios highly interdisciplinary and will range from GIS-based
• Provide insight and actionable information needed resource and siting assessment, to engineering modeling
to successfully guide technical advancement, of systems and processes at the unit operations level, to
integrated system scale-up, and commercialization interdependency analyses of the entire supply chain. Exhibit
10.4 illustrates a broad systems perspective of issues and
DOE’s Biomass Program employs a wide range of approaches for the overall algae biofuels supply chain from
analytical tools, data, and methodologies to support siting and resources to product end-use. The categories
decision-making, guide research, and demonstrate shown follow the process steps in the algal biofuel supply
progress toward goals. In conjunction with the Algae chain sequence. Such summarization of key areas to be
Roadmap, Biomass Program’s strategic and portfolio addressed to enable algal biofuel production provides
analysis efforts are expanding to include algae with guidance for the scope of content that should be integrated
techno-economic modeling and analysis (TEA), life cycle into systems techno-economic modeling and analysis.
assessment (LCA), and geographic information system
(GIS) based resource assessments.

Exhibit 10.2 Systems and Techno-Economic Modeling and Analysis as a decision-support tool
It can track and assess performance, and evaluate investment cost/benefit/risk tradeoffs to inform both technical and programmatic decisions

S&T, Systems & Processes Areas
Biofuel Conversion
Cost, Performance, and Risk Metrics

Extraction & Fractionation
Harvesting & Dewatering
Algae Science & Biomass Production
Stage-I Advances Systems Infrastructure & Integration
Uncertainty Range

Cost & Risk
Reductions Stage-II Advances
Perfomance
Improvements Commercialization Threshold

Cost & Risk
Reductions
Perfomance
Improvements

T0 (current status) T1 T2 (e.g., 5-15 years)

Roadmap Timeframe Multi-Stage R&D,
Demonstration, Commercializtion, Deployment

94 10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis 

Energy & Fuel Economics; Algal Biomass & Biofuel
Energy-Water-Environment Production Systems,
Interdepencies; Process Engineering
Carbon Emissions & & Other Sciences
Capture

Policy Analysis

Exhibit 10.3 Techno-Economic Modeling and
Analysis addresses interdependent issues

The scope of TEA will ideally include the capability to level, which in turn must function within climate and
apply and integrate detailed process engineering and weather conditions that vary with geographical location,
physics-based modeling at the unit operations level the approach needs to be both multi-level and multi-scale.
with multi-scale and multi-path systems modeling and
comparative tradeoff assessment. This can include An algae biofuels and co-products supply chain will be a
geospatial (GIS-based) data collection, analysis and complex interdependent system with numerous alternative
visualization, systems and processes optimization, pathways and functional elements and feedbacks at various
and dynamic interdependency analyses of the overall spatial and temporal scales and resolutions, as suggested
supply chain at a local, regional, national, or global in Exhibit 10.5. System and process simulation and
scale. A major environmental impact element will optimization under a system engineering framework can
be life cycle analysis (LCA) to assess GHG impacts prove very beneficial for system design and operation. For
and other resource use footprint (e.g., water). example, optimizing conditions that produce the highest
neutral lipid content of the algal biomass under a range
The overall goal is to capitalize on the power and insight of design conditions, when bio-oil feedstock production
available through application of well developed computer is the primary pathway and objective, may not lead to the
modeling and analysis tools combined with disparate highest overall biomass or lipid productivity. Similarly,
database information that exists or can be developed. achieving the most affordable and sustainable production
For example, a process-based algae growth model that of algal feedstock, in terms of resource use intensity
accurately reflects and integrates the dynamic behavior of and cost per unit of end-use biofuel produced under a
the key biological processes with the engineered growth specific set of scenario conditions, may not result from the
system and its time-dependent physical and chemical pursuit of the algal oil production pathway altogether.
conditions (including local time-varying climate and Sensitivity analyses and global system optimization
weather) can not only provide more detailed input to and comparative tradeoff assessments across a range of
the techno-economical performance analysis of algae approaches and conditions are among the critical modeling
cultivation, but can also reveal opportunities for improved and analysis needs. Meeting such needs requires a flexible
system and process design and operation. Since the modeling and analysis framework and suite of tools that
characteristics of the biological system at the microscopic can specifically address the broad scope and multiple
algae cell level affect the performance of the engineered pathways spanned by an algae biofuels supply chain
cultivation system and processes at a higher integrated system. Geospatial GIS-based data integration and analysis

10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  95

Exhibit 10.4 Scoping the content for Systems Techno-Economic Modeling and Analysis: Key topic areas and issues for the overall algal
biofuels supply chain

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION & INTERDEPENDENCIES

Conversion
Algal Biology Cultivation Harvesting & Extraction & Processes Biofuels Policy &
Sitting & Inputs
S&T Systems Dewatering Fractionation Co-Products, Regulation
& Services

Geolocation/ Species Selection Open Ponds Filtering Extract Processes Conversion Processes Taxes
elevation & Matching to - lined Flocculation/ - Solvent - Biochemical Incentives
Land characteristics Growth Conditions - unlined Settling - Acoustic - Thermochemical
- Electromagnetic - Digestion Permitting
Characterization - raceway
Climate/Weather Airlift Flocculation - Other - Hydrotreat/ Enviromental
- wastewater
Solar Insolation Performance treatment Centriuge Seperation/ Refine Impact
Water Souces/ Strain Improvement Closed PBRs Drying Fractionation Fuels Health & Safety
Issuses - horizontal tube Biological Assist - Membrane - Biodiesel Algae Control
- brackish Biomass Growth
- vertical tube - brine shrimp - Distillation - Green diesel & Regulation
- wastewater & Oil Conditions
- vertical planar - fish - Centrifuge - Aviation
- produced Photoautotrophic Other
- other - Other - Gasoline-like
- desalination organism operation Other
Hybrid System Intermediate - EtOH
concentration Products - Biogas/methane
Heterotrophic Combinations
-marine - TAG Oil - Other
organism operation - covered ponds
- fresh - Other Lipids Co-Products
Algae Pathogens, - pond/PBR mix
- losses, re-use ▪ Polar - Feed
- salt build-up Predators, and Heterotrophic ▪ Neutral - Fertilizer
CO2 Sources Mitigations - Industrial - Carbohydrates - Chemicals
- power plants Bioreactors - Proteins Services
- cement plants - Wastewater - Other - Carbon capture
- fermentation/ Facilities Compounds - Water treatment
other - Water
Operations,
Chemical/Materials Monitoring & Direct secretion
Energy/Power Maintenance of EtOH or
hydrocarbon fuel
Infrastructure
precursors into
growth medium,
avoiding Harvest &
Dewatering steps

is also key to siting and resource assessment and the design, uncertainty in data while still capturing the underlying
analysis and optimization of facilities location and supply dymanics of the overall system. Although quantitative
chain logistics (from algae cultivation through end-use uncertainty will remain, the results can provide qualitative
fuels and products biorefining, transport, and distribution). system behavior and trends still useful in helping
guide technical, economic, and policy decisions. More
Algal biofuels remain an emerging field at a relatively thorough analysis and modeling refinement, informed
immature stage of development. As a result, data for by field data expected to become available as larger-
detailed unit operations and process analyses for different scale pilot and demonstration projects are established
technical approaches for algae cultivation, harvesting, and and operated, will more clearly reveal the most critical
post-processing into fuels and other co-products is currently challenges and guide investments and technical advances
sparse and uncertain. Selected modeling and analysis needed to enable successful commercialization of
approaches can be used to effectively accommodate such economical, scalable, and sustainable algal biofuels.

96 10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis 

5 The dynamic coupling and interdependencies across the algal biofuels and co-products supply chain 10. It was noted that there Preparation for the Algae Roadmap Workshop and the is a need and role for both integrated systems modeling as discussion among participants during and after the event well as detailed engineering design and process modeling.Closed systems &/or Drying & Seperation . as exemplified by Exhibit 10. Policy & Regulation. location. Replacement Market Externalities: Cost of Energy.Hybrid systems Feedbacks Resources Proteins & Conversion .Requirements Harvesting Dewatering Extraction Oil / Lipids . individualized modeling and analysis efforts and configurations of rapidly evolving systems and by industry and technology development organizations processes. and therefore.Water Water Capture .Capital Co-Gen . that should tend to focus on a technology or process. Monitoring.Land (cost.Performance . and levels of detail best suited to and analysis efforts underway by DOE in support of the perform the necessary modeling and analyses based on other bioenergy and biofuels programs. soil) Broader . unavailable for broader use and objective assessment and validation. Exhibit that the needs for coupled models of differing fidelity and 10.Characteristics . tilt.7. Details of systems’ and processes’ technical and economic performance achieved by industry and LCA Approach (Workshop other technology developers are also usually considered Results and Discussion) proprietary. Demand & Price for Co-Products vs. Included in the Workshop discussions was the question of Due to their more limited and immediate business how best to approach the multiple and disparate paths objectives. geology. Operations.Equipment . their alternatives. or enterprise level rather than broader efforts.Materials Energy Feedbacks . etc.3 Suggestions for TEA and supply chain.Temperatures Design & Economy Feedbacks Nutrient . similar to the modeling approaches.6 illustrates various complementary modeling and scales will be defined in the early stages of the systems analysis approaches and techniques that come into play at modeling R&D effort and will evolve as time goes on. unit operation.Solar Insolation Environment . develop. Cost of Petroleum & Conventional Fuels. Incentives & Barriers Siting .CO2 / Flue Gas Conditioning Other Coproducts .GMOs Biology . Exhibit 10. scales.Climate/Weather Feedbacks Conversion Carbohydrates Biofuels Algae Cultivation .Nutrients (NPK) or Treatment & Re-Use .Open systems . different levels within the broad systems scope presented. One approach with photoautotrophic microalgae integrated systems modeling and analysis across the is modeling major cultivation system categories 10. Maintenance.Autotrophic . identified the need to clearly define the scope and determine and that the two should be coupled.Labor . and utilize a range of and industry development effort. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  97 . Workshop participants the role that systems TEA and LCA can and should play generally agreed that modeling and analysis should be a in support of algal biofuels development. be considered in algae biofuels modeling and analysis production plant. It is also expected available and emerging information and data. Also identified critical part of a national algae biofuels research program was the need to adapt.Primary Energy Electric Power and Process Heat Generation Capital Construction.Species .Heterotrophic .

economic.g.. and processes and performance parameters is another definitions. resource use. • Cost (& offsets) of co-products production other) • Carbon footprint cost accounting • Climate/ Weather/ Temperature Conditions • CO2 resources ( point source emitters. regional.. specific technologies. Higher-Level Dynamic Meta-Systems Modeling (Integrated Analysis Framework) • Broad value-chain scope. economic. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . from resources & sitting through production to end use • Algae biofuel and co-products industry scale-up potential. various groups doing ad-hoc modeling and assessment specifically focused on their chosen approach and Standardized interface requirements and definitions could technologies (e. or a hybrid competing options and the broader scope of interdependent combination. and Life Cycle Analysis of open pond. The disadvantage of such a be established for system and process functional blocks that distributed and narrowly focused approach is that it is often would enable the development of an open-source modeling done in isolation with limited or no consideration of other and assessment platform with “plug & play” flexibility.Technical..) • Cost of biofuel production • Water resources (fresh wastewater.Vendor/ Supplier cost estimates (ASPEN+) • Engineering and construction cost estimates • Process GHG footprint (LCA) assessment . production availability. with learning curves & improvement projections .ICARUS cost estimate software (or equivalent) • Operations & Maintenance cost estimates Geographic Information System (GIS) Analysis and Visualization • Cost (& offsets) of co-product feedstock • Land resources (characteristics.. and optimization of of possibilities could quickly become unmanageable.Integration with existing infrastructure . storage • GREET (Argonne National Lab) infrastructure • LEM (UC/ Davis). transport. and policy issues • Feedbacks and Multiple Sector Interdependencies. and essentially represents what exists today with “community of practice” for the algae biofuels industry. Etc. Flexibility and usefulness Developing numerous detailed models that are each could be increased to the extent that such modeling uniquely customized to a specific combination of systems and analysis can be done using common standards. The size of the “matrix” engineering design. with time delays. closed photobioreactors. and interface approaches... GIS Analysis.. 98 10. how better inform technical. Narrowly “beginning-to-end value chain” for algal biofuels focused and detailed technical and economic modeling production with adequate resolution and detail is very and analysis is valuable and necessary for those doing challenging and still emerging. across an emerging approach.. and activating only those portions of the issues and tradeoffs that need to be addressed together to hybrid configuration model desired. development. platform). processes and integrated systems for commercialization. enviromental.6 Multiple levels and complementary approaches available for Algal Biofuels Systems and Processes Techno-Economic Modeling.Required build-up of new infrastructure... etc. and policy decisions to best conceptualize a model that spans the overall at the state. • Other infrastructure and enviromental features Exhibit 10. pipelines) Other LCA Modeling • Fuel processing. Beyond this.Engineering & construction estimates from industry . constraints & impacts . can link to other models & analyses Process Flow Enginering Modeling Static CAPEX & OPEX Calculations • System and process equipment cost estimates • Mass & energy balance calculations . and national level.

3 CO2 2.2 Fuel . universities. Chemicals 2.) and non-technical issues.Field . Exhibit 10. Energy Source derivative biomass & Markets 3.Storage 4.3 Chemical G.5 Biological Assist 2. Feed 1. and national labs. and represents utilizing different techniques such as high performance an example of a GIS-based information gathering physics-based modeling (e.1.7 High-level multi-pathway algae biofuel process flow diagram for the algal biofuels and co-products supply chain Much more detailed or custom models of individual Work currently underway on the Knowledge Discovery subsystem or process blocks could then be developed by Framework (KDF) by DOE’s Biomass Program is various others in industry.Transport fish excrement. Other Q.4 BY PASS A..2 Filtering 8. etc. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  99 .1 Closed system 1. Wet algal or biological assist Infrastructure 1. Aviation 6. and other technical Defense.5 Biological assist Harvesting (shrimp. Carbohydrates O. 2009).1.3 Hybrid systems & settling 1. 4. Ethanol 1. etc.3 Macroalgae R. cultivation systems) or process engineering models using widely accepted and applied commercial process modeling tools like AspenPlusTM or customized spreadsheets.1 Fuel 5.4 Systems Analysis Flexibility in being able to link custom subsystem or process models into an overall meta-system Overview modeling and analysis framework would provide a System analysis is foundational to designing a strategy capability that could be of significant value and benefit for algal biofuel deployment. Fertilizer Inputs 1.1 Chemical C. moving in this direction (Getman. Gasoline-like 6.1.2 Electromagnetic 5.2 Cyanobacteria R.1.7 is a revised adaptation systems.1.4 BY PASS 6. Green diesel 6.2 Co-products 1. EPA.Distribution . Materials 2.0 1. 5. Exhibit 10.1 Flocculation 2.g.2 Land Cultivation 3. Lipids H.) 4.3 Water 3.3 Centrifuging biomass 3. 10. processes of the flow diagram that shows a representative number • Private investment / funding sources 10.3 Biochemical E. Dried Algal 1. biofuel production.2 Thermochemical & Separation D.1 Microalgae Conservation F. USDA.5 provides • DOE & national labs doing R&D.2 Open system 2. assessment.0 J. and a high-level illustration of the interdependent character tracking of program investments of the overall algae biofuels value chain that involves a • Other federal and state agencies (Department of broad range of systems. Triglycerides N. computational fluid dynamics and analysis platform that can be productively used modeling of open raceway ponds or closed photobioreactor and leveraged for algae biofuels development.1. Proteins P.5 Light or Alt.4 Off-shore systems 3.1 Solar . To facilitate system-level • Universities doing a wide range of technical/ thinking during the Workshop.0 Extraction Conservation 6.0 Harvesting L.End Use Exhibit 10.1 Algae species 3. A system is an aggregation to different stakeholder communities such as: of subsystems interacting such that the system is able to deliver an over-arching functionality. a process flow diagram was economic/policy R&D and assessment developed and presented at every breakout track discussion to illustrate the intricate interdependencies of algal • Industry developing and commercializing technologies. Hydrogen K. processes. Biogas / Methane Metabolites I. Fatty Acids M. Biodiesel 5.0 Drying .1 Physical (Thermo/Mechanical) 5.

solar insolation. assumptions in individual processes to the overall system. nuclear energy. number of permutations of potential pathways to algal biofuel production.8 represents a mass and energy on the product or co-product chosen. and chemical kinetics of the systems and of these resource can have on algae biofuel production processes used. and understanding key information from each node in the and other local environmental conditions. Systems analysis can help manage the complexity of • Climatic characteristics (temperature.5 and Exhibit 10. • Other infrastructure and environmental features Engineering Analyses and Several critical resource factors will impact large-scale. etc. Inputs to each will likely emerge. such as: processes that are shown in the process flow diagram • Land and water resources of Exhibit 10. among others. availability.of multiple path process options available for every step technical information and data about the systems and in the algal biofuel production chain. regional. evaluate costs. risk. Established in 2003 in response to the Hydrogen what steps in the process are most energy intensive. Sub-level accurate analyses. Example engineering analysis tools scale-up was touched on earlier in chapter 9. wind electrolysis. The overall viability and examine the sensitivity of different options for hydrogen production include goal gasification. H2A was designed to consider various highlighting areas for research and development. storage infrastructure technical performance. pipelines) offs from various scenarios with regard to cost. P. identifying and appropriately modeling • Water evaporation loss (function of climate. most of which are still immature and An example of this type of analysis is presented in emerging. and tracking of mass and energy balances that include and availability of supplemental CO2 and other nutrient evaluation of the thermodynamic. unit operations level require the systematic calculation efficiency of water use. there is precedence for this value of this kind of systems mass and energy balance sort of undertaking in DOE’s Hydrogen Analysis (H2A) assessment is that it can help assess the overall viability Project within the overall Hydrogen Program (DOE. Many of the process steps will differ depending Exhibit 10.) enumerated and designated as goals to be achieved. and others beyond balance systems level view of an algal biomass and algal those selected for inclusion in the figures also exist or lipid cultivation and extraction system. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . The cost include AspenPlusTM and FLUENTTM. GIS Assessments sustainable production of microalgae biomass. This program could serve as a guide for moving Geographic Information System (GIS) Visualization forward with analysis of algal biofuel production. K) supplies. A substantial number of barriers are (characteristics. Critical climatic and natural (energy requirements and costs) of the systems and resource data can be readily accessed. These Engineering analyses (technical and economic) at the include climate and the adequate availability of water.8. Exhibit 10. transport. (N. temperature. Collecting such as time-dependent solar insolation. and environmental impacts.8 represent a large detailed process engineering data may be lacking. from algae growth processes involved to appropriately formulate and conduct to fuel and co-product processing and end-use. and organic molecule reforming. especially where Both Exhibit 10. availability of suitable land. and each numbered node attempt to develop a comparative analysis based on so represents a mass or energy balance calculation. producing algal biofuels and co-products by quantifying precipitation. thus Fuel Initiative. • CO2 resources (point source emitters. This may also require coupling processes that made up different thematic topic discussion with appropriate external data and driving functions sessions in the Workshop are all inter-related.) interdependencies and feedbacks. The impact that availability and cost biological. hydrodynamic.) uncertainties. characteristics of algae themselves and the characteristics and national scales. of a given algal biomass production system and show 2009). The pathways toward a hydrogen economy. Though it may seem daunting to system component are shown. and Analysis tools (referenced also in chapter 9) are indispensible for algae production and supply Other chapters of this Roadmap point out the lack chain systems analysis due to their ability to perform of availability of detailed information about the mapping and resource analysis spanning local. etc. Simpler and process becomes the primary task of the systems analysis. and benefit tradeoffs of CO2 capture through biofixation which require sufficient understanding and detailed using photoautotrophic microalgae cultivation enhanced 100 10. etc. development of mass and energy based systems models energy and environmental tradeoffs and set research can help evaluate different proposed processes for priorities and inform policy by sound analysis. • Fuel processing. and comparing trade.8. The many process permutations. more approximate preliminary spreadsheet analyses are more appropriate as a first step.

Land.g.. re-use Potrential Protein Biofuel Feedstock Materials. followed downstream by the necessary concentrations. The possibility fuel and co-product markets at the end of the suppy chain. and Capture & Neutral Lipid Systems Infrastructure. P. with the existing hydrocarbon fuel handling. e.g.) forcing functions and boundary transport. Exhibit 10. Hexane System Chemical Dissolved Air Recovery & Centrifuge Drying Solvent Nutrients Flocculation Flotation (N. can help determine the practical upper limit • Cost (& offsets) of co-product feedstock production • Cost of biofuel production • Carbon footprint cost accounting Exhibit 10. nutrients. and transport of water... Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  101 . Currently. Co-products Polar Lipid Site Preparation Carbohydrate 10. the economics can be expected to improve. storage. the data available to implement this type of analysis are thought to be preliminary and refinement Producing biofuels that are highly compatible. Hexane microfiltration e. resource management. can provide powerful feedstock production and downstream processing can be capabilities for estimating performance and for improving integrated with existing infrastructure and markets. e. Utilities. nutrient other co-products. Potential facilities relative to upstream algae biomass production CO2 capture and utilization in algae biomass production and downstream fuel and co-product markets. and data are also integral to system analysis as they reveal financial sets developed and leveraged to provide the necessary investment or market incentives needed for algae biofuel assessment capabilities to guide research. Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Neutral Lipid Bioreactor Harvesting Harvesting Dewatering Solvent Air & CO2 Dewatering Extraction &/ or Pond e.. supply chain. or totally based on model improvement and validation with data fungible.by the addition of CO2 from industrial sources will affect on the size and the optimum site locations of biorefinery the economics of algal biofuel production. including example calculations presented later in this chapter. and end-use infrastructure would result in production systems under a range of site and climate easier and more widespread market acceptance. with the appropriate models. ambient temperature. tools and capabilities to an open raceway pond system that supplemental CO2. Equipment. same would apply to co-products and their potential markets. and policy decisions. geographic location attributes and time dependent climate The economics of algae-based biofuels and co-products and weather data.g..8 Notional baseline algae feedstock production system Sunlight H2O Energy & Solvent & Water & O2 Other Inputs Energy Energy H2O Recycle Microalgae Photo. of combining these types of spatial and physical data to To the extent that operations can be effectively co-located project possible algal production scenarios as a function of or established within reasonable distances across the geography and climate is an interesting avenue of inquiry. e. business deployment. tools. and distribution infrastructure could benefit from GIS analysis. from the operation and monitoring of larger scale algae distribution. solar insolation. etc. storage. and energy). Some examples are: development..g. • POLYSYS At the downstream end. Biomass e.g. the relative location and • ICARUS cost estimate software (or equivalent) logistical costs associated with fuel processing. is discussed in more detail through a few selected The combination of GIS resource assessment. Structures. sourcing. • Equipment. The conditions with multiple species of algae could be useful. These and related issues should be an integral Economic analysis tools for static capital expense part of techno-economic modeling. K. Operation & Maintenance cost estimates transport. analysis and LCA (CAPEX ) and operational expense (OPEX) calculations for algae. This information.. in press). storage. Midstream will be the includes an algae growth model driven by environmental logistics of transport.) Water Energy Residues: TAGs & Other Facilities.9 is an example of the and costs of supplying inputs needed for algae production application of high-performance computational modeling (suitable siting. for • Discounted cash flow analysis example. etc.g. and distribution into the various end-use conditions (James and Varun.g. and biorefining into fuels and (e. At the the technical design of systems and their operations for front end of the supply chain. this will include the logistics different site conditions. with physics-based modeling of will depend in large measure on the degree to which algae cultivation systems and algae growth.

and meteorological forcing functions • Includes algal biomass growth model • CE-QUAL couples nutrient kinetics and 22 independent variables (N. Si. like cost of subject to more limited water supplies. carbon materials from industrial or municipal waste This variation will determine the spatial surface streams can provide bridge feedstock in the near- 102 10. in press) area of cultivation systems needed to achieve a set Recent analysis suggests an upper theoretical limit on amount of product. and affordable accessibility of such water sources. wind. These aspects were discussed in some detail in Chapter 9. vary over the U. and annual variation in other assumptions made in the analysis (which include solar insolation.350 .) (Weyer et al.700 gal/ac-yr.9. Capture and re-use of non-fresh water. can potentially help fill this need. and basis. 50% oil content. O2…) to model growth rates. aspects of large scale agriculture. and sustainability of suitable water Impact of Geographic Variability of supplies for algae production will be a key input factor Inputs on Algal Biofuel Production Costs for inland cultivation. but it is appropriate here to briefly note • The supply. cost. Exhibit 10. water. are amount of water required nationally could begin to not unique to the development of algal biofuel technology. and it will affect the amount limit on the order of ~4. Areas The various inputs necessary for algal biofuel production of the country with the highest solar resource best have been described earlier in this chaper and in other suited for algae growth also tend to be more arid and chapters of the Roadmap. Such analysis can enable both performance prediction and pond system design optimization after appropriate refinement and validation with monitored field system data (Adapted from James and Varun. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . but will variation of resource availability will have major impacts be dependent on the geographical location. etc. Certain elements.) will also affect both conditions. and fertilizer. on cost of production and scale for commercial viability.5. • Availability. though important for overall TE analysis. evaporative loss. coastal. particularly with open systems subject to macroalgae and microalgae cultivation (autotrophic. and mixotrophic) for which geographical in particular. The daily. 2009). Under large power. and offshore sites. Open raceway pond example of physics-based algae cultivation system modeling and anlaysis. and nutrient gradients • Solar insolation and other environmental. the variations. availability.000 gal/ac-yr and perhaps a practical that can be captured. the productivity and reliability of production. etc. as well as other climate-related the availability of high solar insolation consistent with factors such as temperature and weather (cloud lower latitudes and/or high percentage of clear weather cover. based of culture that will need to be processed on a daily on the expected losses. and will be heavily dependent on geographical location and local conditions. photosynthetic efficiency. heterotrophic. it will affect the amount of CO2 the order of ~38. productivity. Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Algal Raceway Pond Using Modified EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers Codes • The Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) solves 3D Navier-Stokes equations of open channel flow to model speed. approach the same order of magnitude as large scale There are. on the other hand. precipitation. climate. but these commercial algae industry build-up scenarios.. and cost of organic carbon the following: feedstock needed as input for heterotrophic microalgae production will play a major role in the commercial • The average annual insolation is generally the viability and extent to which national production dominant and rate-limiting factor for autotrophic algal capacity can expand using the heterotrophic approach. and this factor varies widely across the Sugar from commodity crops and other organic country among inland.S. P. availability. seasonal. temperature.

and costs of offshore cost of lignocellulosic material deconstruction into marine operations will have a major impact on simple sugars and other organic carbon compounds costs of production. the size of an autotrophic algae of suboptimal (high or low) temperature. and is a consideration that appropriately processing lignocellulosic biomass requires further investigation. Finally. and perhaps also for offshore sites. it may not much. if not more. Conversely. The affordability of • Land prices and availability can also impact the cost generating organic carbon feedstock from such of biofuel production at inland and coastal sites. availability. N. Algae can be production capacity will demand the use of sugars effective at capturing and concentrating heavy metal and other suitable organic carbon source materials contaminants (Aksu. 1998. temperature control. such as are present in some forms of flue gas. 2009) can potentially help supply specific strains for extended durations.. but for each approach operational costs for algae (Massingale et al. availability. but evaporation will also add to • CO2 availability and cost of delivery will play a major operating cost (for water replacement and/or for salt role in autotrophic microalgae cultivation scalability management with brackish or saline water. the amount of nutrients required nationally versus the matching of affordable production scale to could begin to approach the same order of magnitude the sustainable and affordable supply of the required as large scale agriculture. and inland • The supply. and cost of other nutrients sites will all be location-dependent. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  103 . and co-products like animal feed. If it is agriculture (Huang. waste materials from agriculture clear how best to factor this into the calculation. 2009. 2009). and municipal waste streams will be location-dependent. where recent cost and supply input resources with the required output product issues have had negative impacts on the industry processing and distribution infrastructure and markets. though it is not yet energy crops. and and processing improvements needed to reduce the the associated logistics. adding to the cost. materials will also depend on technical advances For offshore sites. 2008).. dependent on the geographical location. other) production. The key tradeoffs will be between the cost Under large commercial algae industry build-up of overall production (capital and operating costs) scenarios. Even in active thermal management for growth during periods the case of co-location. In necessary to distribute the facility over a number of the absence of nitrogen fixation. As noted here and in chapter closed systems operating inland can overheat. carbohydrates. The quality of the systems will provide the same engineering problems CO2 source will also play a role for algal growth. and can be an appreciable factor in proteins. it will be advantageous to co-locate cultivation requiring active cooling that can add prohibitively to facilities with stationary industrial CO2 sources. and operating expense.g. 9. algae can require as smaller parcels of land or offshore sites. 2008) it will likely be an optimum minimum and range to the same extent as for large scale commercial of size for a commercial production facility. (Huang. on the industrial build-up. For open nutrients for algae production scale-up. and petroleum). it may be co-located industries or the CO2 source may allow necessary to transport CO2 over some distance. but applying facility will require extensive pipeline infrastructure for this heat or energy to extensive algal cultivation CO2 distribution. the logistics and costs could impact the suitability of residual biomass for associated with producing. The capture and reuse of nutrients • As in traditional agriculture. risks. infrastructure facilities for offshore. but this the cost of operations. Waste heat and energy from will not be feasible in all instances and thus.. but this will be systems operating at inland sites in the summer. carbon credits materials in the form of woody and herbaceous must also enter into this analysis. coastal. term. It is reasonably (i. This As with cellulosic ethanol.e. Commercial fertilizer costs are overall cost of total algal biomass and intermediate tied closely to the cost of energy supplies (natural gas feedstock fraction (e. 2005). the right of access and use. scale. 2009). some sources are likely to require more cleanup than others (especially if there are plans for animal feed as a co-product and/or if the CO2 source stream includes 10. K) required as inputs for algae growth will straightforward to calculate the impact of the cost also play a role in commercial viability and extent of of land. but major sustainable scale-up of national contaminants that inhibit algae growth). and forest industries. lipids. derived originally from lignocellulosic biomass. Malcolm et al. P. water evaporation rates will provide some level of and affordable accessibility of such nutrient sources. transporting.. the temperature during from various agricultural and municipal waste streams the growing season will restrict the ability to cultivate (Woertz et al.. Mehta and Gaur. nitrogen than conventional biomass be possible to get the most benefit of economies of crops on a mass balance basis (Alexander et al.. Cost of site preparation and suitable for feeding heterotrophic microalgae. and and costs as transporting and distributing CO2.

energy) impacts among different approaches to personal communications with field experts. There are indications. variability in approach to final costs (from per gallon LCA is considered to be a key element of the scope of TE of algal oil to per kg of “raw” biomass) and illustrate modeling and analysis within the context of this roadmap. output flows. white papers / industry analyses. A dynamics simulation model also phased approach that consists of four major components: provides an integrated analysis framework that can include: goal definition and scoping. 2009). and compiling suggested directions for research and development from the participants. These included technical reports prepared environmental impacts and tradeoffs of industrial systems for the U. To facilitate the Workshop’s can play a significant role in the national energy economy objectives of identifying needs. These 1993. LCA is important for assessing relative Oswald. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . process. potential. it is system performance for an industry that has yet to be likely that a technology that will require the production commercially realized is one of the biggest challenges for of immense volumes of biofuel at affordable cost so it techno-economic analysis. from manufacture. and policy issues • Feedbacks and Multiple Sector Interdependencies with links to other models and analyses 104 10.S. life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). to final disposal. however.5 Algae Production production will benefit from detailed inputs that take into consideration the variations in cost and availability of the Costs and Uncertainties essential elements for cultivation. UNEP. constraints and impacts 2009).. While these variations Data gathering and validation of technical and economic may be minor relative to the technical uncertainties. and co-product credits. LCA for biofuels can also • Integration with existing infrastructure assess impacts and tradeoffs associated with utilization • Required build-up of new infrastructure with time intensity for water. 2004) up systems. Benemann and and processes.12 (ISO. While most algal biofuels production. 2006. they also present a wide based on other renewable and non-renewable feedstocks. co-generation addition to net GHG emissions. operating costs. LCA is a systematic technique to assess Systems dynamics modeling is a powerful and flexible the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated modeling approach that can foster collaborative analysis with a product. and other resources. data base resources. ISO. 1997). would be subject to narrow operating margins.g. modeling. shortcomings of the existing literature and modeling 2005).. 1987). and in comparison with fuels citable sources are quite dated. and numerous others (EPA. 1993).6 Preliminary System (EPA. that a and including algae (Kadam. a general lack of demonstrated operating parameters The systems modeling and analysis framework for algae and widely varying basic assumptions on a number of biofuels must include the integration of appropriate parameters from algal productivity to capital depreciation LCA methodology and metrics (Curran.. and • Broad value-chain scope: from resources and interpretation as illustrated in Exhibit 10. nutrients. 1996. Delucchi. costs.g. EPA. or service. 1997. the UC/Davis Lifecycle Emission Model (Delucci. Department of Energy (e. Bernard. combination of improved biological productivity and fully integrated production systems can bring the cost The term “life cycle” refers to the major activities in the down to a point where algal biofuels can be competitive course of the product’s life-span. 1997. peer-reviewed literature (e. and maintenance. and tools have been developed that include Argonne National • Algae biofuel and co-products industry scale-up Laboratory’s GREET “well-to-wheels” model (ANL.In summary. waste stream 2002 and 2004). learning curves and improvement projections • Technical. algal oil feedstock Life Cycle Analysis production cost analyses were reviewed based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a “cradle-to-grave” range of sources to gauge the status of algal biofuel analysis approach for assessing the resource use and technology. life cycle inventory analysis (LCI). The process employs a and scenario studies. Exhibit 10. and water. delays. environmental. siting through production to end use LCA methodologies. energy. 2001 and 2002). including the raw material acquisition required to manufacture the product 10. the calculations for the cost of algal biofuel 10. • Input resources. resource use. use. Tapie and GHG emissions and other resource utilization (e.11 illustrates the typical life cycle stages considered in an LCA and the typical inputs/ Dynamics Modeling outputs measured. eliciting discussion. 2009. EPA. with petroleum at approximately $100 per barrel.g. 1996). economic. and specifically leverage past and current LCA knowledge base present a challenge in designing scaled work specific to biofuels (ANL 2009. EPA. In resource capture and reuse.

technical • Identify research areas most in need of support and economic performance for various pathways.can facilitate the • Identify critical path elements that offer opportunities use of the model to conduct rapid ‘what if’ analyses and for cost reduction tradeoff studies using different yield scenarios. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  105 . Workshop effort and is currently a work in progress. e. The model will eventually include • Identify external factors that will impact cost more detailed systems and processes modules for multiple • Provide plan for entry of algal biofuel into a renewable pathways being pursued for algae biofuels and co-products. The model approaches1 currently includes only a limited amount of available data. fuel portfolio along with the ability to do Monte Carlo simulation. and has • Employing modular modeling. • Inform and perhaps guide formation and/or varying parameters values within pre-set ranges in order modifications to public policy to describe the uncertainty or robustness of model output.g.7 Potential Directions The Techno-Economic Analysis can accomplish this by: for R&D Effort • Stressing dynamics over detail initially. continued progress INPUTS OUTPUTS Atmospheric Raw Materials Acquisition Emissions Waterborne Raw Materials Wastes Manufacturing Solid Wastes Use / Reuse / Maintenance Coproducts Energy Recycle / Waste Management Other Releases System Boundary Exhibit 10. The preliminary participants specifically suggested that the following modeling uses algae production and resource availability areas be addressed in the modeling and analysis. • Establishing interface requirements between To adequately inform research and investment decisions sub-systems for algal biofuel deployment. expanding The model described above was initially prepared in detail later as available and needed outline form for the algae roadmap workshop. • Incorporate appropriate insights and benefit from alliances with industry associations 10. data and assumptions from the same information sources discussed earlier in this chapter and in chapter • Determine the current state of technology 9.11 Scope of Life Cycle Analysis (Adapted from EPA 1993) 10. and resource constraints.The development of a system dynamics model for \in techno-economic analysis and the capture of data conducting scenario analysis of algal biofuels production from fielded systems as they emerge over time can scale-up and operations was initiated as part of the roadmap provided needed additional information. ISBL and OSBL been developed further since the workshop. Interactive graphical user interfaces.

the complementary bi-lateral feedback of process performance uncertainties (technical and economic) information and insight between the modeling and analysis. Addressing the uncertainties in a systematic more rapid technological advancement leading toward and integrated modeling and analysis framework will help commercialization. operation. units.12 Phases of a Life Cycle Analysis (Adapted from ISO. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . etc. have been identified along various steps in the value chain. significant algae-to-biofuels production system and fashion. 1997) • Leveraging university and industry resources algal biofuels industry. Goal Defination and Scope Interpretatation Inventory Impact Analysis Assessment Exhibit 10. and evaluation of larger-scale algae biofuel production systems and processes that can provide data to validate and improve the modeling. guide needed investments and speed the deployment of an 106 10. Throughout the roadmap workshop and report development When done in a closely coordinated spiral development process. the development. can facilitate Roadmap. monitoring. A critical complementary need is • Maintaining industry standard notation. and the experimental and operational investigations These have been noted in this and earlier chapters of the with larger-scale systems in the field.

Biotechnology Advances. (in press). Benemann. Cincinnati: Ohio. J. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: Process options and economics.S. Mgmt.energy. Dunahay. including AspenPlus® and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (formerly Aspen Icarus Process Evaluator®).pdf Rittmann. pp. 1997. (1996). Berlin. C. USDA. NREL Report No. 20–43. B. E.. pp. Suppl. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. “Power Plant Flue Gas as a Source of CO2 for Microalgae Cultivation: Economic Impact of Different Process Options”.biblio. DOE Hydrogen Program. Argonne National Laboratory (2009). Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). http://www. S. (Grant No. US-EPA LCA Resources Web Site (latest update July 2009): Available on line at: http://www. ISBN 0-07-015063-X. and energy use in transportation (GREET) model. and Oswald. Kadam. Second generation biofuels: High-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Optimizing algae growth in open-channel raceways.. 2002.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET/ AspenTech (2010).gov/ord/NRMRL/lcaccess/resources. Medina. C.R. J. S505-S510. (EPA/600/R-92/245). (1998)..S. Environmental management ..G. P. 203-212.gov/bridge/product. Belarbi. Acien Fernandez. Bioenergy knowledge discovery framework. regulated emissions.. E. Mark (2004). UCD-ITS-RR-04-45.. Kadam. Journal of Computational Biology.localenergy. Posten. McGraw-Hill. (2001). Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms. Fertilizer Prices.org/pdfs/Document%20Library/Bioenergy%20conversion%20factors..R. Energy Convers. Molina.aspentech.transportation. M.. K. Life cycle assessment: Principles and practice. Cincinnati: Ohio.gov/ and specifically the DOE Hydrogen Analysis (H2A) Project: http://www. 2002-08”.K. S. Sheehan. K.C. Kadam. Kruse. and Hankamer. International Standards Organization. O. “Microalgae Production from Power Plant Flue Gas: Environmental Implications on a Life Cycle Basis”. ERS Report AR-33. B.. November 2009. J. “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Lifecycle Analyses of Transportation Fuels“.com/core/ Benneman. K.Y. Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles.osti. USDA ERS Report Number 86. International Standards Organization. Curran (ed).A. Energy v. 491-515.pdf 10. DOE’s aquatic species program – Biodiesel from algae. (1993).. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Mehta. G. DOE (2009). J.epa. (2008). Bioenergy conversion factors. W. 25(3).References Aksu. Springer-Verlag.L. DE-FG22- 93PC93204).L.anl. AspenTech software product portfolio. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment. TP-510-29417. (2009). (1997). “Factors Contributing to the Recent Increase in U. 905-922. and Marca Weinberg (2009). A look back at the U. Marx.H.hydrogen. Available online at: http://www. (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress and prospects. February 2009. Office of Research and Development. James. and Chisti. ISO 14040. (2003).jsp?query_id=1&page=0&osti_id=493389 Curran (1996). (NREL/TP-580-24190). D. U.. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  107 . (1998). Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO2 to biomass. pp.gov/h2a_analysis. T. Scott A. F. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2004. Office of Research and Development. Y-S Won and N.38..html Getman. 37-54. (2006). and Varun. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Thomas-Hall. (2003). Available online at: http://www. (EPA/600/R-06/060). “Ethanol and a Changing Agricultural Landscape”.F. 20.. Delucchi. A..E. S. A.gov/docs/legosti/fy98/24190. and Gaur. (2009).. v.H..L. (2002). 100(2). Huang. Y. Geographic Information Science and Technology Group. http://www. Bioenergy Research. (1997). Stephens. March 2009. The greenhouse gas. B. Biosorption of heavy metals by microalgae in batch and continuous systems. E. P. Mussgnug.hydrogen. (2008). eds.nrel.html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Wen-yuan (2009).Principles and Framework. http://www. Schenk. and Roessler. Malcolm. Tam. 113-152. Available online at: http://www.” In: Wastewater Treatment with Algae.27. Report prepared for the Pittsburg Energy Technology Center.energy. J.Life cycle assessment . Marcel Aillery.P. 1(1). “Environmental implications of power generation via coal-microalgae cofiring”.

Journal of Environmental Engineering.asp?site=lcinit&page_id=138F5949-6997-4BE6-A553-585E92C22EE4#lcirap Weyer. Woertz. A. pp. United Nations Enivironment Programme (UNEP). 1115-1122.Tapie. Darzins. Bush. net/sites/lcinit/default. (1987). Biotechnology and Bioengineering.. v135. D. D. Lundquist. 108 10. Available online at: http://jp1. Nelson (2009). Life cycle approaches: The road from analysis to practice. I. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.. Microalgae production: Technical and economic evaluations. P and Bernard. BioEnergy Research. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . A. 32. K. T. (2009). (2005). n11. R. 873-885. and Y. & Willson. Theoretical Maximum Algal Oil Production.. M. American Society of Civil Engineers. United Nations Environmental Program. “Algae Grown on Dairy and Municipal Wastewater for Simultaneous Nutrient Removal and Lipid Production for Biofuel Feedstock”. 1 -10. Feffer. A. B.estis..

Link could. the business strategies of many existing partnership most relevant to the advancement of the algal companies are focused on one or more aspects of biofuels industry is perhaps the research partnership algae. realizing benefits in both categories. analyses of various federal agencies exposure to fundamental science and engineering R&D..g... and government programs aimed at public-private which can support a quickening pace of innovation. has increasingly invoked commercialization of algal biofuel technology. This partnerships are documented (Audretsch et al. the U. academia can be either public or private. many of which may be investor-backed and of DOE programs on the clean energy sector (Brown. 2001. many focusing on one to a few elements in national laboratories. and industry. increase the capital efficiency of commercial et al. This chapter discusses potential models for public-private and government agencies and laboratories in partnerships in general and specifically as related to algal various combinations to pool resources in pursuit biofuels. pre-revenue. Various models for such partnerships employed of a shared R&D objective.1 shows the potential benefits of for membership and intellectual property models. Partnerships based participants. including specific studies on the impacts firms. as well as reduces the risk of private 2001. but not necessarily producing transportation envisioned by the Council on Competitiveness (1996): biofuels from cultivated algal biomass at scale. leading public-private partnerships not only for large-scale to rapid industry growth and a stable market. however. collaboration between private entities (e. Partnerships are defined as cooperative arrangements engaging companies.. 2002).11. Public-Private Partnerships   109 .1 Benefits of algal biofuels public-private partnerships Public Benefits Shared Benefits Private Benefits Energy Security Innovation Quickens Technolgy Commercialization Long-term Clean Fuel Shared Risk & Industry Growth & Market Stability Capital Efficiency Solution Shared Investment Competitive Edge Climate Change Migration Domestic Energy Supply Breakdown Legal & Jobs Creation Sustainable Industry Regulatory Hurdles Clean Energy & Development Science Leadership Growth Stimulates Labor Pool A In this situation. algal biofuels industry.. The the algal biofuels value chain. universities. By focsuing these partnerships on pre- competitive research or critical problems shared by all Exhibit 11. investment. Gallagher et al. given the current state of of a sustainable. 2006).A 11. Brown et al. national laboratories and universities) for development of algal biofuels. Indeed. The type of this industry.g. 2002. given benefit could pull together the current expertise and the fact that the algal biofuels industry is still in its facilities. but also for research and technology developments of national interest (Stiglitz and Wallsten. in past efforts are discussed in the context of applicability to the algal biofuels challenge.1 The Benefits of Algal Biofuels While benefiting both private and public entities from Public-Private Partnerships shared investment toward mutual objectives. Public-Private Partnerships The Workshop participants emphasized the need The algal biofuels industry is evolving with numerous for DOE and other federal agencies to partner with players. also noted the unique partnership on sharing of knowledge and capabilities for mutual environment in algal biofuels development. infrastructure projects. thereby facilitating growth and development infancy. academia. including characteristics Exhibit 11. public- private partnerships have the potential to accelerate Since the 1980s. More specifically..S. 11. industry) and public entities (e. in turn. Industry benefits from public-private partnerships from the 1999).

they are often formed to serve no other purpose. and potential partners can explore areas of mutual interest. global problems. or levels beyond the capability of any individual entity. where no single entity can address the complex research challenge. successful partnerships have have necessarily come together without a government- been identified to include the following attributes: funded solicitation. concept of collaborating on a common basis is the sharing of pre-competitive research results. Through these events. Government solicitations are also an option to promote regulatory issues. Implicit in the gained through openness toward new partnerships. non-profit foundations. • The benefits of partnership outweigh the cost Consortia and trade organizations are membership of collaboration. Through their structure. environment. and demand that the winning team meet or exceed certain success Private Partnerships criteria.C Prize forums can pull together developed technology 11.. national. However. organizations that may provide an opportunity for • The partners can achieve more through collaboration lasting partnerships. such forums may favor mature • Consortia and trade organizations technology in the final stages of development where the • Team-oriented prizes focus can be on assembly into a working system.4 Partnership Challenges in the point at which new researchers can enter and where the Algal Biofuels Industry new thought or methodology is shared with the peers. which could both be a benefit have worked together for many years may not generate (new complementary capability) and a challenge (the the new thinking and fresh approaches that could be understanding of how to work together). However. with the ultimate seminars can be important tools for creating a collaborative solution only as good as existing technology will allow. 2008). consortia and trade organizations can also be an effective • The partnership should not openly conflict with the vehicle for researchers looking for a new approach or interest of other groups (Micheau. prizes have been offered by various for the advancement of technology and know-how to organizations to support solving critical. and private investors) into a single competition. including the development of biofuels. while increasing the opportunity to through public-private partnerships. Basic research and early stage technology with limited funding Networking events such as workshops. these organizations provide for opportunity to facilitate deeper collaborations. Partnerships are facilitated in than they can individually. because some awards are based on having solved the problem. technology scale-up and demonstration. Prize forums can also leverage reward money There are several forums for creating public-private from a variety of different funding sources (state and partnerships: federal government. these environments through collaborations among • The benefits received from the partnership should the membership. which could allow In recent years. as common interest. labor). and provide publicity • Networking events such as seminars and conferences and marketing toolsets for competitors to attract future • Team-oriented government solicitations investors. industry would retain its collaborative research to tackle complex problems competitive edge.players (e.3 Forums for Public. Public-Private Partnerships   .2 Components of Successful in a project-level partnership. these partnerships can • The partners collaborate on the basis of only be expected to last for the life of the project. These events are often 11. 110 11. particularly in instances in which the team would not At the highest level. as well as a platform to share research.g. By maintaining an active directory. Often these types develop and license technology with new partners. into a working system to solve a problem. new partnership. be proportional to the value of the contribution. Such solicitations have Public-Private Partnerships the potential to accelerate technology development. of solicitations are system-oriented. This may result in the formation of teams of proposers 11. conferences.B. scientists and engineers can learn of new research. However. Partnerships can bring together parties that have not organizations that promote a closed circle of partners who worked together before. and may compete poorly in this type of award.

By reducing scaling risks.5 Modeling Partnerships for • Pre-commercial-scale user facilities that are Technology Development accessible to researchers and developers Of the different forums for public-private partnerships. Public-Private Partnerships   111 . construction personnel. government solicitations. prize and innovate new cost-cutting measures. all of the key attributes for successful partnerships noted earlier. the established industry sectors represented by most B http://www. real estate developers.g. overcoming the lab-field and information technology. particularly between industry and public-policy and regulatory challenges. Academia will competitions. in order to fully realize the potential key technological challenges must be addressed for of the algal biofuels industry. Is it structured to develop and commercialize new technology? In the biofuels industry. it is useful to conceptualize Technology partnerships could be used for following the various models for public-private consortia in terms objectives: of the five attributes of successful partnerships within the context of particular scenarios (e. several in algal biofuels. nanotechnology. events. develop new algae-based fuels and co-products. performance aspects of development of new natural or GMO algal strains the fuel.mitcep. algal oil extraction. technology development. distributors) across the across the entire algal biofuels value chain. etc.) or an open access repository and collaborate on the end goals (specific intended use. economic. This type of partnership would greatly accelerate semiconductors.org/ 11.xprize. particular algal • Share knowledge of existing algal strains through strain.). requirements. and the most difficult to implement. conversion process.2. dewatering pathway. monitoring of growth operations • Collaborate on the development of technologies Considering the following four external characteristics for biomass harvesting and extraction of can help evaluate consortia models: algal components from the biomass • Share knowledge of fuel requirements • Openness. value chain to address technical and non-technical needs. Doing so may help define the boundary problem(s) for focus by a public-private consortium • Share knowledge of algal cultivation and and bring clarity to the composition. A compare some of these existing public-private consortia public-private partnership for pre-commercial-scale user models against these four external characteristics. collaborate on the development of dynamic and expected contributions of the membership. Therefore. Also.org/future-x-prizes/energy-and-environment C http://www. 2009). Does it share investment equitably? field (Willems. this characteristics. Algal biofuels will likely face similar issues since natural environmental constraints Different consortia models exist and it is possible to could have a significant impact on algal productivity. public-private partnerships the algal biofuels to become viable. Does it seek to grow the industry? laboratory have traditionally not translated well to the • Shared Investment. 11. algal growth and harvesting. consortia. it will need labor to run its are formed or sustained through networking operations. are needed to ensure that academia develops students capable of addressing the challenges industry faces As discussed in greater detail in this document. effective way to address technological. Collaborative partnerships. marketing • An open environment to share ideas and technology and public relations specialists.. and fuel conversion. These include: are needed to engage field experts (e. aviation. etc. technologies developed in the • Industry Growth.. How inclusive is the membership and utilization to advance fuel conversion to its industry (or segment thereof)? technologies toward marketable products • Technology Commercialization.g. facilities could allow for new technologies to be road- as illustrated in Exhibit 11. The exhibit compares tested and scaled before full-scale deployment in the PPP models from five different industry sectors – field. or trade organizations—can be an be the workhorse that generates labor for this new industry. These consortia require • Labor force and intellectual talent to draw upon. lawyers. Because the ecosystem in the algal type of partnership can help incentivize commercial biofuels industry is unique and differs greatly from investment of similar full-scale algal operations. and academia. • Technology development in algal biology.Public-private partnerships—whether they As this industry expands. biofuels. collaborative consortia for technology development are • The generation of basic methods and standards. These PPP models are scaling barrier and the lack of private capital to conduct mentioned only to serve as examples of the four external such applied research. to road-test their technologies.

models presented. and determine how to best adapt / implement these attributes.2 Comparison of Some Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Models TECHNOLOGY SHARED INDUSTRY FOCUS ENTITY TYPE OPENNESS OF PPP INDUSTRY GROWTH COMMERCIALIZATION INVESTMENT • Collaborate on pre-competitive R&D • Designed selected by membership to increase competitiveness of • Transfer of technology by existing US firms in publication or member- marketplace • Open membership website data transfer • Provides • Cost-shared Non-Profit • Represent • Technology further commercialization by government Corporation industry interests developed to manufacturing network that and industry at Semiconductors (501c6) with • Forums inspiring solutions with external drives economic start-up physical cross collaboration partners. Exhibit 11. this industry may find that no specific model will meet all of its needs. discuss and debate the merits of each. However. then adopted development • Now funded facilities amongst members • PPP owns created IP and • Develops solely by industry • Public conferences provides non-exclusive. for an algal biofuels public-private consortium to meet its specific mission successfully. • Government Government Centers or partner facilities changing. coordinated royalty-free license to industry roadmap to members focus R&D and spur • PPP can also license IP to on economic growth third parties • R&D conducted at Research • Address game. Public-Private Partnerships   . it could be helpful to consider these attributes and models. high-risk Agency • Partners with barriers through funding Research industry and • Industry partners to targeted R&D • State funding Centers universities commercialize developed IP • Industry growth • Financial and Biofuels (not a • Public conferences • IP licensed to interested supported through other resources separate legal and workshops parties with an evaluation education from national entity with of commercialization labs • Opportunities for potential • Limited industry employees) collaboration involvement to • Transfer of technology by address issues on publication industry growth 112 11.

including years Aviation & FAA (not a industry. companies 11. and members commitment for paid-up license to industry social issues over 3 years members inspire cross collaboration amongst members • Collaborative research amongst consortium • Technology members designed development and to reduce technical. Public-Private Partnerships   113 . royalty. academic as members agree to cross large established • Industry match separate legal and government license background and firms and small for same number entity with partners newly developed IP non. • No federal amongst committee to with employees royalty basis as needed to funding researchers from address issues on achieve the widest possible universities and industry growth dissemination. academic • Pre-competitive research and national lab • Government selected by all members Non-Profit partners. non-exclusively general aviation funding for over 8 with NASA • Consortium of • Commercialization afforded market. and regulatory designed to reduce bottlenecks operational costs Industry • IP licensed exclusively or and increase • Government consortium • Open membership. facilities business. • Technology • Founding universities physical technical. and transfer focus and of knowledge through commercialization member-only database network • Donor-driven • Research conducted by model • Industry growth university • Industry and supported through University • Software is open source • State funding university partners education of California licensed over 4 years Information • Numerous forums • Limited industry Institute • Other IP is either licensed • University funds Technology Research inspiring cross involvement (not a separate non-exclusively. • Industry growth funding for over 5 • Research conducted by Corporation • Technical through education years national labs and member Nanotechnology (501c6) with workshops. standardization operational. TECHNOLOGY SHARED INDUSTRY FOCUS ENTITY TYPE OPENNESS OF PPP INDUSTRY GROWTH COMMERCIALIZATION INVESTMENT • Open membership • Consortium of industry. • Industry gifts collaboration through Advisory legal entity free basis or exclusively. only licensed to member financial • PPP provides non-exclusive. businesses of years employees exclusively to each other • Significant industry royalty-free involvement • Transfer of technology by provides market publication.

In Rosenau. Paton. Energy-technology innovation. D. 193-237. (2006). Link. and Siegel.D. W... R&D Policy for Competitiveness. limited resources. Brown. S. The MIT Press.N. (1996). and Wallsten. 29(14). Public-Private Partnerships   . (2001). Holdren. Link. Energy Policy. and Scott. (ed). A.B. Levine.V. J. Science. 29(14). (2000). Endless frontiers. M.. (2002). Stiglitz. (2001). Brown. P.T.S. 145-158.A. M.References Audretsch.. Washington: U.D. Energy Policy. Scenarios for a clean energy future. P. K... 707-708. Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitflass. (2002). Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. D. The biofuels landscape through the lens of industrial chemistry. Willem. (2009). 1197-1207. Gallagher. 31(1).A.G.. Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies.N.. 325(5941). and Sagar. 1179-1196. 114 11. Research Policy. J. Council on Competitiveness. A.P. A.A. An analysis of public initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. 31.E. 1459-1466. 31. Annual Review of Environment and Resources.J. Research Policy. and Koomey J. Public-private policy partnerships.S.S. J. D. M.. Short.

S. Department of Agriculture Doug Borger Lockheed Martin John Bouterse Envo Smart Sara Boyd BCS. Department of Energy Biomass Program Leslie Bebout NASA Ames Research Center Lucie Bednarova General Motors Amha Belay Earthrise Nutritionals John Benemann Benemann Associates Linda Benjamin Food and Drug Administration Christoph Benning Michigan State Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya.S.S. Department of Energy David Bayless Ohio University Jacques Beaudry-Losique U.Appendices Appendix 1 : Workshop Participants Walter Adey Smithsonian Institution John Aikens Lybradyn Mark Allen A2be Carbon Capture Gennady Ananyev Princeton Alex Aravanis Sapphire Energy Ed Archuleta El Paso Water Utilities Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency Ricardo Arjona Abengoa Bioenergy Virginia Armbrust University of Washington Bob Avant Texas A&M Tom Avedisian U. Inc. Diplomacy Isaac Berzin And Strategy Catalino Blanche U. Andrew Braff Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Jim Brainard National Renewable Energy Laboratory Jerry Brand University of Texas at Austin Tom Brennan Arch Ventures Michael Briggs University of New Hampshire Jim Bristow Joint Genome Institute Kevin Brown - Malcolm Brown University of Texas at Austin Nathan Brown Federal Aviation Administration (Office of Environment And Energy) Kent Bryan City of Celina 115 Appendices   . Lauder School of Government.

Department of Agriculture Heriberto Cerutti University of Nebraska .William Buchan NASA Ames Research Center Jay Burns Bionavitas Arthur Butcher CPS Energy Thomas Byrne Byrne & Co Martin Carrera BP Matt Caspari Aurora Biofuels Chris Cassidy U. Department of Energy. Das University of Georgia John Datko Air Force Office of Scientific Research Chris Davies Independence Bioproducts Brian Davison Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mark Decot U.S. Department of Agriculture Paul Falkowski Rutgers University John Ferrell U. Biomass Program Daniel Fishman BCS.Lincoln Alice Chen Environmental Protection Agency Parag Chitnis National Science Foundation Daniel Cicero National Energy Technology Laboratory Mike Cleary National Renewable Energy Laboratory John Coleman Algenol Jim Cook Univenture Doris Cooksey CPS Energy Keith Cooksey Montana State University Michael Cooney University of Hawaii – Manoa David Daggett Boeing Al Darzins National Renewable Energy Laboratory K.C. Inc. Todd French Mississippi State Christian Fritsen Desert Research Institute Matthew Frome Solozyme Maria Ghirardi National Renewable Energy Laboratory Appendices   116 .S.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program Michel Delafontaine Hawaii Biocrude Gregg Deluga General Electric Global Research Harrison Dillon Solazyme Dan Drell Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research Donn Dresselhuys Old Dominion University Bruce Eldridge University of Texas at Austin Tj Evens U.S.

Department of Agriculture Mark Hildebrand Scripps Institute Masahito Hiratake Mitsubishi International Kent Hoekman Desert Research Institute Neil Hoffman U.S. Biomass Program Michael Graves University of Massachusetts Bailey Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Eli Greenbaum Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nathanael Greene Natural Resources Defense Council Michael Gregoire U.S. Department of Energy.S. Department of Energy. Department of Agriculture Tom Gross If. Biomass Program Suzanne Goss Jacksonville Electric Authority Paul Grabowski U.S.S. LLC Arthur Grossman Stanford Guritno “Guri” Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Molly Hames U.Warren Gillette Federal Aviation Administration (Office of Environment And Energy) Jim Gillingham Valero Dan Ginosar Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Robert Glass Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Steven Gluck Dow Chemical Steve Gorin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program Laurel Harmon UOP Deanna Hatch Organofuels Incorporated Pat Hatcher Old Dominion University David Hazlebeck General Atomics Bob Hebner University of Texas at Austin Grant Heffelfinger Sandia National Laboratories Erik Helm Environmental Protection Agency William Henley Oklahoma State Doug Henston Solix Biofuels Jurg Heuberger County of Imperial Kevin Hicks U. Department of Energy. Department of Agriculture Ed Hogan Natural Resources Canada John Hogan NASA Ames Research Center John Holladay Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 117 Appendices   . Golden Field Office Anders Handlos Grauslund Novozymes Zia Haq U.S.

Department of Energy Biomass Program Geetha Kothandaraman ConocoPhillips Walt Kozumbo Air Force Office of Scientific Research Heidi Kuehnle Kuehnle Agrosystems Peter Lammers New Mexico State University Cynthia Lane American Water Works Association Todd Lane Sandia National Laboratories Mario Larach Kai Bioenergy Corp.C. LLC J.Andy Horne Natural Resources Development Jeff Houff Hydrogeologic. Hunter-Cevera University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute Mark Huntley University of Hawaii Stephen J. Inc Qiang Hu Arizona State University Neil Huber Army Michael Huesemann Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Peter Hug Recombinant Innovation. Rachel Lattimore Arent Fox LLP Edward Laws University of Hawaii at Monoa Gordon Leblanc Petrosun Joo-Youp Lee University of Cincinnati Paul Lefebvre University of Minnesota James Lester Stratus Consulting Jack Lewnard Gas Technology Institute Casey Lippmeier Martek Kent Lohman Midwest Research Institute Tryg Lundquist California Polytechnic State University Appendices   118 .S. Miller Chevron Chevron Gil Jackson United States Agency for International Development Jacob Jacobson Idaho National Laboratory Robert Jagusch Minnesota Muncipal Utilitees Association Eric Jarvis National Renewable Energy Laboratory Jeff Jeter Honda Libby Jewett National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration James “Jim” Sears A2be Carbon Capture Michael Johnson Massachusetts Institute of Technology Glen Kertz Valcent Alex Kinnier Khosla Ventures Douglas Kirkpatrick Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Melissa Klembara U.

Department of Energy Lissa Morgenthaler-Jones Livefuels Jerry Morris Innovation/Biodomain . Roberta Parry Environmental Protection Agency 119 Appendices   .V. N.S.S.John Magnuson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Len Malczynski Sandia National Laboratories Mike Manella ADM Russell Martin Blue Source Anthony Martino Sandia National Laboratories Margaret McCormick Targeted Growth Patrick McGinn National Research Council John McGowen Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University Diane McKnight University of Colorado-Boulder Steve Meller Procter & Gamble Omar Mendoza United States Air Force Walter Messier Evolutionary Genomics Blaine Metting Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory Greg Mitchell Scripps Institution of Oceanography John Mizroch U. Mayfield Scripps Research Institute Mike Pacheco National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Panesgrau National Renewable Energy Laboratory Frank Parker Organofuels Incorporated Helen Parker Algaelink. Department of Agriculture Alyson Myers Kegotank Biofuels Nick Nagle National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Nobles University of Texas at Austin Charley O’kelly Blue Marble Energy Lou Ogaard CEHMM Kelly Ogilvie Blue Marble Energy John Ohlrogge Michigan State University Jose Olivares Los Alamos National Laboratory Phil Ovitt Senator Brownback Office George Oyler Johns Hopkins University Stephen P. Kenneth Moss Environmental Protection Agency Chuck Mueller Sandia National Laboratories Jeff Muhs Utah State University Walter Mulbry U.Shell Global Solutions Inc.

Ron Pate Sandia National Laboratories Leslie Pezzullo U. Department of Energy.S. Biomass Program Schild Philippe European Commission Philip Pienkos National Renewable Energy Laboratory Maria Piera Abengoa Bioenergy John Pierce Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Daniel Pike AF Research Lab Jennifer Pinkerton LA Department of Water & Power Bradley Plantz University of Nebraska-Lincoln John Plaza John Plaza Robert Polak Phycal Juergen Polle Brooklyn College Matt Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Steve Potts EPA Office of Water Peter Pryfogle Idaho National Laboratory Steve Przesmitski National Renewable Energy Laboratory Theras Pugh American Public Power Association Ron Putt Auburn University Nigel Quinn Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kenneth Reardon Colorado State University Hal Reed American Water Valerie Reed U.S. LLC Gerson Santos-Leon Abengoa Bioenergy Richard Sayre Donald Danforth Plant Science Center Philippe Schild European Commission Gerald Seeley Old Dominion University/Company Mark Segal Environmental Protection Agency Mike Seibert National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joel Serface Kleiner Perkins Appendices   120 . Department of Energy. Biomass Program Ron Reinsfelder Shell Global Solutions Bruce Resnick Cargill Curt Rich Van Ness Feldman Mark Riedy Andrews Kurth Kathy Roach MurphyTate. LLC John Robbins Exxonmobil Paul Roessler Synthetic Genomics Roger Ruan University of Minnesota Jim Ryan MOR Supercritical.

Inc. Biomass Program John Spear Colorado School of Mines Karl Stahlkopf Hawaiian Electric Company.S. LLC Tanja Shonkwiler Jamestown Ny (Outside Counsel) Blake Simmons Sandia National Laboratories Knut Simonsen DTE Energy Resources. Department of Energy. Biomass Program Evonne Tang National Academy of Sciences Jeff Tester Massachusetts Institute of Technology Robert Thomas South Australia R&D Institute Jonathan Trent NASA Ames Research Center Pat Unkefer Los Alamos James Van Etten University of Nebraska Peter Van Den Dorpel Algaelink. N. Evan Smith The Verno Group Seth Snyder Argonne National Laboratory Milton Sommerfeld Arizona State University Glenn Sonntag U. Jean Vandergheynst UC Davis Tom Verry National Biodiesel Board Sanjay Wagle Vantagepoint Venture Kevin Wanttaja Salt River Project Michael Webber The University of Texas at Austin Alan Weber Marc-IV Consulting Donald Weeks University of Nebraska . Department of Energy.S. Inc.Lincoln Alan Weimer University of Colorado at Boulder Zhiyou Wen Virginia Tech Norman Whitton Sunrise Ridge Algae 121 Appendices   .V. Cai Steger Natural Resources Defense Council Dan Stepan Energy & Environmental Research Center Jake Stewart Organic Fuels Mark Stone Desert Research Institute Belinda Sturm Kansas University Transportation Research Institute Sidhu Sukh University of Dayton Xiaolei Sun Arizona Public Service Sam Tagore U.Pamela Serino Defense Energy Support Center Chris Shaddix Sandia National Laboratories Alex Shearer SRI International John Sheehan Sheehanboyce.

Department of Energy Golden Field Office Grant Heffelfinger Sandia National Laboratories Mark Hildebrand Scripps Institution of Oceanography John Hogan NASA Ames Research Center Qiang Hu Arizona State University Michael Huesemann Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Eric Jarvis National Renewable Energy Laboratory Geoff Klise Sandia National Laboratories Alina Kulikowski-Tan Carbon Capture Corp Pete Lammers New Mexico State University Jared Largen BCS.S. LLC.S. Maria Ghirardi National Renewable Energy Laboratory Stephen Gorin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tom Gross IF.Elizabeth Willet Mars Symbioscience Bryan Willson Colorado State University Byard Wood Utah State University Christopher Wood Platt River Power Authority David Woodbury Biofuel Producers of America (Bpa Paul Woods Algenol Ben Wu Livefuels Don Wyma National Intelligence Officer For Science And Technology Joyce Yang U. Appendices   122 . Inc. Department of Energy Biomass Program Chris Yeager Savannah River National Laboratory Ross Youngs Univenture Tim Zenk Sapphire Energy Zhenqi Zhu Stevens Institute of Technology Yonathan Zohar University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute Appendix 2: Contributors Jim Brainard National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tom Brennan Arch Ventures Bill Buchan NASA Ames Research Center Mike Cleary National Renewable Energy Laboratory Michael Cooney University of Hawaii – Manoa Al Darzins National Renewable Energy Laboratory Daniel Fishman BCS. Inc. Molly Hames U.

S. Inc. Len Malcynski Sandia National Laboratories Tony Martino National Renewable Energy Laboratory Steve Mayfield Scripps Institution of Oceanography Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joanne Morello U. Department of Energy. Guri Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Mike Seibert National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joel Serface Kleiner Perkins Chris Shaddix Sandia National Laboratories Blake Simmons Sandia National Laboratories Amy Sun Sandia National Laboratories Joyce Yang U. LLC. Department of Energy. Biomass Program 123 Appendices   .S.S. Biomass Program Chuck Mueller Sandia National Laboratories Nick Nagle National Renewable Energy Laboratory Michael Pacheco National Renewable Energy Laboratory Ron Pate Sandia National Laboratory Leslie Pezzullo U. Biomass Program Philip Pienkos National Renewable Energy Laboratory Juergen Polle Brooklyn College Matthew Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Ron Putt Auburn University Kathy Roach MurphyTate.Yantao Li Arizona State University Tryg Lundquist California Polytechnic State University Rajita Majumdar BCS. Department of Energy.

Solazyme (Chief of Genetics) Douglas Haughey not listed Joel E. Inc. Kostka Florida State University David Lewis The University of Adelaide Margaret McCormick Targeted Growth Lissa Morgenthaler-Jones LiveFuels. LLC Carnegie Institution for Science (Staff member). Wenbert The Eden Tube Project Norman M. Rittmann Arizona State University G. Mark Segal Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Alexander D. Stanford University Arthur Grossman (Adjunct Professor). Algal Farms Inc. Whitton. Dr. Shenderov BioLogical Technologies. 2) General Systems Research LLC Matthew Frome Solazyme Michael R. Bruce E. Robert S Weber Sunrise Ridge Algae. Bob Avant et al Texas AM Halil Berberoglu University of Texas Shulin Chen et al Washington University Barry Cohen National Algae Association Anju Dahiya 1) The University of Vermont . Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Mary Rosenthal Algal Biomass Organization Richard Sayre and Ursula Goodenough Donald Danforth Plant Science Center and Washington University Gerard Seeley Jr. Valentin Soloiu Georgia Southern University Lance Stokes ECI Environmental Compliance Jefferson Tester Cornell University Willem Vermaas Arizona State University.Appendix 3: Respondents to Request for Information on the Draft Roadmap Daniel Angell TPA Inc. Gale PetroAlgae. School of Life Sciences Marc von Keitz and Steve Heilmann University of Minnesota. Biotechnology Institute David L. Inc Matt Peak Prize Capital María Piera Alberola Abengoa Matthew Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Bruce Resnick Cargill Center for Environmental Biotechnology. Dr. Inc. Paul Woods Algenol Xiaohan Yang Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tim Zenk Sapphire Energy Appendices   124 . Biodesign Institute.

.

eere. DOE/EE-0332 www.energy.gov .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful