BIOMASS PROGRAM

National Algal Biofuels
Technology Roadmap

MAY 2010

National Algal Biofuels
Technology Roadmap
A technology roadmap resulting from the National Algal Biofuels Workshop
December 9-10, 2008
College Park, Maryland

Workshop and Roadmap sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Office of the Biomass Program
Publication Date: May 2010

John Ferrell Valerie Sarisky-Reed
Office of Energy Efficiency Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy and Renewable Energy
Office of the Biomass Program Office of the Biomass Program
(202)586-5340 (202)586-5340
john.ferrell@ee.doe.gov valerie.sarisky-reed@ee.doe.gov

Roadmap Editors:
Daniel Fishman, Rajita Majumdar,1 Joanne Morello,2 Ron Pate,3 and Joyce Yang2
1

Workshop Organizers:
Al Darzins, Grant Heffelfinger, Ron Pate, Leslie Pezzullo,2 Phil Pienkos,4 Kathy Roach,5 Valerie Sarisky-Reed,2 and the
4 3 3

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE)

A complete list of workshop participants and roadmap contributors is available in the appendix.

Suggested Citation for This Roadmap:
U.S. DOE 2010. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Biomass Program.
Visit http://biomass.energy.gov for more information

BCS, Incorporated 2Office of the Biomass Program 3Sandia National Laboratories
1

4
National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5MurphyTate LLC

this report could be “influential scientific information” as that term is defined in the Office of Management and Budget’s Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin). As such.This report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of energy. . Further. This report has been peer reviewed pursuant to section II. the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law No.2 of the Bulletin.

This Roadmap lays the groundwork for identifying challenges that will likely need to be surmounted for algae and cyanobacteria to be used in the production of economically viable. it remains committed to fostering technologies that could yield substantial benefits over time. It is intended to serve as a resource for researchers. Through appropriated dollars and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. while DOE works to deploy renewable energy and energy-efficient projects across the country today. engineers. and we hope it fosters and informs participation from existing and new stakeholders as the next steps are taken to advance algal biofuels. and the stability of our global climate. but their significant potential to serve as renewable transportation fuels warrants our thorough consideration of what efforts are necessary to make them a commercial-scale reality. comments gathered during a public comment period.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Biomass Program’s National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap.Preface Welcome to the U. this document represents the synthesis of the Biomass Program’s National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap Workshop. DOE looks forward to continuing its work with diverse partners in evaluating renewable energy options and facilitating development of those that carry the greatest benefits today and in the years to come. other federal agencies. These national challenges require near-term solutions as well as investments in nascent technologies that show promise for the future. Achieving cost-competitive. research managers. private companies. DOE is investing in a variety of research. Meanwhile. as well as the recognition that we will not likely achieve these goals via one technology pathway. DOE has recently revived its investment in algal biofuels in response to the increased urgency of lowering greenhouse gas emissions and producing affordable. and decision-makers by providing a summary of progress to date and a direction for future algae RD&D activities.S. Renewable energy lies at the intersection of some of our nation’s most pressing issues: our energy security. and the academic community are also increasing their efforts to optimize and commercialize this renewable energy source. Therefore. This Roadmap is intended to summarize the state of technology for algae-based fuels and document the research and development challenges associated with producing them at a commercial scale. our economic wellbeing. engineers. Valerie Sarisky-Reed Acting Manager. and supporting scientific literature. Biomass Program U. and other stakeholders. sustainable algal biofuels will entail years of research and careful planning. Department of Energy Preface  i . development. environmentally sound biofuels. reliable energy. and demonstration (RD&D) projects that seek to tackle key technical hurdles associated with commercializing algal biofuels. industry representatives. Prepared with the input of more than 200 scientists.

and Renewal Act. Of these candidates. held December 9-10. by 2022. To accelerate the deployment of sources (fresh. development. produced. The two-day event feedstocks and intermediates. 2009. a variety of different biofuels and gallons of renewable fuels. While cellulosic ethanol is expected to play a large role There are several aspects of algal biofuel production that in meeting the EISA goals.S. opportunities across the nation have renewed interest in developing algal feedstocks for biofuels production. illustrated the potential Program to invest in the research. and 6) potential recycling of CO2 and other in new research on biofuels in the American Recovery nutrient waste streams. announcing $800 million in new biofuel research activities I n recent years. some microalgae and renewable source of biomass feedstock for biofuels have the potential to accumulate significant amounts has been explored previously. ii Executive Summary  . These include: the goal. while at the same time moving the nation ever closer to non-arable land. cyanobacteria (the so called “blue-green algae”). to contain a minimum of 36 billion to fungible biofuels. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring transportation sugars from cyanobacteria and macroalgae. an effort Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s (EERE) Biomass undertaken from 1978 to 1996. and macroalgae (or While the basic concept of using algae as an alternative seaweed). a number of next generation have combined to capture the interest of researchers and biofuels show significant promise in helping to achieve entrepreneurs around the world. In addition fuel sold in the U. biomass-derived fuels have received increasing attention as one solution to our nation’s continued and growing dependence on imported oil. biofuels derived from algae 1) high per-acre productivity. fungible Workshop. and create economic and programs. marine. brackish. Under certain conditions. including advanced and products can be generated using algae precursors. which exposes the country to the risk of critical disruptions in fuel supply. Much has changed since deployment of commercial algae-to-biofuel processes. 5) production of both biofuels and valuable Energy Steven Chu announced the investment of $800M co-products. 2) non-food based have the potential to help the U. weight). These fuels can also be produced using other algae by DOE-EERE’s Biomass Program. Rising petroleum prices and a Additional funding is being directed to algae-to-biofuel national mandate to reduce U.Executive Summary “ ” Developing the next generation of biofuels is key to our effort to end our dependence on foreign oil and address the climate crisis – while creating millions of new jobs that can’t be outsourced — Secretary of Energy Steven Chu at the White House ceremony on May 5. 2008. dependence on foreign research both in EERE and other government agencies oil. This announcement included funds for the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy The DOE-supported Aquatic Species Program. cellulosic biofuels and biomass-based diesel. and advanced biofuels. the end of the program. 3) use of otherwise non-productive. including starches and brought together more than 200 scientists. engineers. Photo courtesy of the our national security. creates economic and social uncertainties for businesses and individuals. and of algae as a biofuel feedstock. was convened fuels. These characteristics give great potential for The National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap an immediate pathway to high energy density. The Energy Independence and Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton Security Act of 2007 (EISA) established a mandatory (CCMP). President Obama and Secretary of wastewater). provide environmental benefits. meet the new RFS feedstock resources. 4) utilization of a wide variety of water energy independence. The term algae can refer to microalgae. sustainable of lipids (more than 50% of their ash-free cell dry and commercially viable system has yet to emerge. a scalable. and impacts A culture of the microalgae Botryococcus.S. saline.S.

and comments received during a public comment period. Executive Summary  iii . algal feedstocks and to document the feasibility and scalable. and the private sector in implementing national This document represents the output from the Workshop. supporting scientific literature.research managers. and deployment efforts. this document will serve to commercial scale. and regulators from across the country to scale. The ability techno-economic challenges associated with scaling to quickly test and implement new and innovative up of processes. federal agencies. By documenting the challenges across the algal discuss and identify the critical challenges currently biomass supply chain and highlighting research and hindering the economical production of algal biofuels at coordination needs and gaps. research. algal biomass production systems at commercial financiers. guide researchers and engineers. development. policymakers. industry representatives. the Roadmap Workshop effort suggests document is intended to provide a comprehensive state that many years of both basic and applied science and of technology summary for fuels and co-products from engineering will likely be needed to achieve affordable. The Roadmap In summary. This document also seeks to explore technologies in an integrated process will be a key the economic and environmental impacts of deploying component to accelerating progress. and sustainable algal-based fuels. lawyers.

Open Ponds Example Cultivation Systems POLICY SITING AND RESOURCES iv Executive Summary  Development Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis: Guiding Path Toward the Research and a . macroalgae (seaweed). Designing an optimum cultivation system involves leveraging the biology of the algal strain used and inegrating it with the best suited downstream processing options.FROM ALGAE FROM TO TO ALGAE BIOFUELS BIOFUELS An Integrated Systems An Integrated Approach Systems to Renewable Approach Energy to Renewable that is E nergy ALGAE FEEDSTOCKS CULTIVATION Microalgae and cyanobacteria can be cultivated via photoautotrophic methods (where algae require light to grow and create new biomass) in open or closed ponds or via heterotrophic methods (where algae are grown without light and are fed a carbon source. brackish waters. Fermentation Tanks MICROALGAE CYANOBACTERIA MACROALGAE Algae as feedstocks for bioenergy refers to a diverse group of Closed Photobioreactors organisms that include microalgae. scalability. such as sugars. Algae occur in a variety of natural aqueous and terrestial habitats ranging from freshwater. Macroalgae (or seaweed) has different cultivation needs that typically require open off-shore or coastal facilities. and hyper-saline environments to soil and in symbiotic associations with other organisms. marine. to generate new biomass). managing. Understanding. Isolating new strains directly from unique environments will ensure versatile and robust strains for mass culture needed in biofuels applications. and sustainability of algae to biofuel systems. and cyanobacteria (formerly called “blue-green algae”). and taking advantage of the biology of algal strains selected for use in production systems is the foundation for processing feedstocks into fuels and products. Choices made for the cultivation system are key to the affordability.

biochemical.. issues. While many analytical techniques exist.g. biodiesel and jet fuel). Most challenges in extraction are associated with the industrial scale up of integrated extraction systems. animal/fish feeds). and proteins. and surfactants) REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS Executive Summary  v Commercially Viable Algal Biofuel Industry . bioplastics. optimizing extraction systems that consume less energy than contained in the algal products is a challenge due to the high energy needs associated with both handling and drying algal biomass as well as separating out desirable products.g. animal feed. 3) Processing of direct algal secretions.. Focusing on biofuels as the end-product O poses challenges due to the high volumes and relative low CH2-O-C R1 values associated with bulk commodities like gasoline and O diesel fuels. fertilizers. While lipids and carbohydrates are fuel precursors (e. proteins can be used for co-products (e. or a 2-O-C EXTRACTION combination of these approaches. CH-O-C R2 O CH2-O-C R3 Bio-Crude Algal Lipid: Precursor to Biofuels Three major components can be extracted from algal biomass: lipids (including triglycerides and fatty acids). in water and can require process steps to concentrate 2) Extraction of algal metabolites. or harvested algal biomass prior to extraction and conversion. and Sustainable HARVESTING / DEWATERING CONVERSION Some processes for the conversion of algae to liquid Conversion to fuels and products is predicated on a basic transportation fuels require pre-processing steps such as process decision point: harvesting and dewatering. Algal cultures are mainly grown 1) Conversion of whole algal biomass. These steps can be energy-intensive and can entail siting Conversion technology options include chemical. gasoline. Abundant. though these are also subject to a number of unique scale-up challenges. The end products vary depending on the conversion technology utilized..g. Affordable. and thermochemical processes. End Uses: • Biodiesel • Biogas • Renewable Hydrocarbons • Co-products • Alcohols (e. Some algal biomass production processes are investigating options to bypass extraction. industrial enzymes. carbohydrates.

vi Executive Summary  .

............................................................................................................................................................20 Considerations of Genetic Modifications..5 Regulations and Standards..................................................2 Algal Physiology and Biochemistry........................................................................................................................................................................1 America’s Energy Challenges....................................... 12 Biohydrogen .............. 15 2................................................... 31 Stability of Large-Scale Cultures .................... Contents 1.......................................................................................................................................11 Algal Carbohydrates.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Enabling Technologies: “Omics” Approaches and Bioinformatics......................8 Isolation and Characterization of Naturally Occurring Algae .....................................................................................................2 Scale-Up Challenges.........................................................................................................1 Strain Isolation....................8 Role of Culture Collections as National Algae Data Resource Centers.....................................................1 Cultivation Pathways................................... Algal Biology.................................................................................................10 2.............................. 29 Macroalgae......................................................................................11 Carbon Partitioning and Metabolism....................................3 Algal Biotechnology..........................................................29 3...........7 Public-Private Partnerships...................................................................................................3 Research from 1996 to Present.........................30 3.......................................................................................................................... Screening and Selection .................................................................1 1......5 1............. 12 Lipid Synthesis and Regulation.................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Algal Cultivation..............................3 Early Work to 1996...........................................................9 Selecting Algal Model Systems for Study....................... 22 References............................................................................................1 About the Roadmap.................7 References................... 29 Microalgae and Cyanobacteria............................................................................................................... 16 The Genetic Toolbox...................................................................................................................................................3 1......................................................................................................................7 2.................................................................................................................................... 31 Contents  vii ..................................................8 2...........................................1 Advantages of Algal Feedstocks.......................................................................................................................................................... Overview....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3...............................................................................................5 Technology and Analysis Challenges...........................................................................................................................................................................................................2 A History of Domestic Algal Biofuels Development..... 19 Applications of Biotechnology to Algal Bioenergy...............................................3 Algae-to-Biofuels: Opportunity and Challenges Today............................................................................................... 11 Photosynthesis and Light Utilization.............................................................................................................................................................................................

...............1 Direct Production of Biofuels from Algae......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 4....................................................................2 Processing of Whole Algae................................................1 Approaches for Microalgae.............................................................................................................................50 Pyrolysis..........................50 6..................44 Selective Extraction................................................................................... 38 Harvesting....................................... 45 Supercritical Fluid Extraction............................................................................46 6................. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies .................37 Harvesting................... 54 viii Contents  .................... and Recycling................. Conservation............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Nutrient Sources................... 33 References............................................................................................... 43 Accelerated Solvent Extraction.....................................................................................................................3 Conversion of Algal Extracts..... 51 Liquefaction....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Water Management........................................................................................ ............................................................................................................. 39 4............................................................................48 Alcohols.....................................................40 Preliminary Look at Energy Balance ................................................................................. Sustainability.............................................................42 5..............................50 Gasification................................................................................................................................. and Management................................... 38 Preprocessing.................................................................................. 53 6.........................................................................................................2 Challenges...................................................44 Subcritical Water Extraction................................................................................ System Productivity.............................................................................................. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering................................................................................................ 45 Heterotrophic Production........................................................................................... 35 4......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Organic Co-solvent Mixtures............................. 39 References.2 Approaches for Macroalgae ...............................3 Systems Engineering ........40 5............................................................................................................................................... 38 4....... Extraction of Products from Algae .................................................................................................................................................................................................................37 Drying............................................................................. 49 Alkanes......... Cell Rupture).......................................................................... 52 Supercritical Processing.................. 49 Hydrogen....................... 53 Chemical Transesterification....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................48 6.................................................................. 45 5..................... .................................................................................................................... 42 Mechanical Disruption (i......................................................................................................... 53 Anaerobic Digestion of Whole Algae........................e...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Current Practices for Lipid Extraction......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................46 References...............

.................................................................................................................................................................64 7. 83 Algae Production Techniques for Wastewater Treatment Plants.................................................................1 Commercial Products from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria................................................74 Photoautotrophic Macroalgae Approach........................................73 Heterotrophic Microalgae Approach.... and Jet Fuel .......... 69 8...................................................................... 70 Algal Blendstocks for Alcohol and Gasoline-Range Petroleum Products.............................................................................................. Gasoline............................................................................................................................................................................................ Resources and Siting ......................................... Distribution and Utilization.................. 55 Catalytic Cracking..................................... 86 The Opportunity in Co-Locating with CO2-Emitting Sources...................................69 8........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................2 Resources Overview........................ 88 Directions for Research and Development...................................................................................................................................... 61 7......................... 73 9.................................. 87 Barriers to Co-Location of Algae Production with Stationary Industrial CO2 Sources ..........................................................75 Climate ....................................................... 58 7........................................................................... 73 Photoautotrophic Microalgae Approach....................................................................................... 86 9................................................................................................. 55 Conversion to Renewable Diesel..............................................72 9...................................2 Utilization.................................................................4 Integration with Water Treatment Facilities ....................................... 84 Main Research Needs for Algae Production with Wastewater ...... Co-products ........................................... 67 8..............1 Distribution............ 88 References............................................................................................................................ 56 6................................................................................................ Biochemical (Enzymatic) Conversion.......................................................................90 Contents  ix ......................................................1 Resource Requirements for Different Cultivation Approaches............................................3 Potential Options for the Recovery of Co-products..........................................80 Land.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 81 9.................. 70 Algal Blendstocks to Replace Middle-Distillate Petroleum Products...........................................................77 Carbon Dioxide......................................................71 References...........................................................................................................................................................................64 References....................................................................................................74 9.................4 Processing of Algal Remnants after Extraction.................... ...................75 Water...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Wastewater Treatment and Recycling Applications....5 Co-location of Algal Cultivation Facilities with CO2-Emitting Industries................2 Commercial Products from Macroalgae......................................................................................................57 References............................................................................................................................................... 61 7.......

......... 111 11..................................93 10.........................................................................1 The Benefits of Algal Biofuels Public-Private Partnerships................ 104 10...........122 Appendix 3: Respondents to Request for Information on the Draft Roadmap..........................................99 Engineering Analyses and GIS Assessments..............................1 Objectives of Techno-Economic Analysis .. 109 11................................... 111 References...........................................................................................................2 Components of Successful Public-Private Partnerships.............................................................................................................................................................10............................................2 TEA Scope and Methods................................................................................................................. 104 10........ 109 11................................... 105 11.............................................. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis......................99 Overview................................ 97 10................................................................................... 104 10.......................................................................................................5 Algae Production Costs and Uncertainties..............................................................................................................................................110 11.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 93 10....................................................................................................................124 x Contents  .................................5 Modeling Partnerships for Technology Development..............114 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Systems Analysis...4 Partnership Challenges in the Algal Biofuels Industry.....................................115 Appendix 2: Contributors.............................3 Forums for Public-Private Partnerships........................................................................................................................................110 11......7 Potential Directions for R&D Effort .................................................................... 100 Impact of Geographic Variability of Inputs on Algal Biofuel Production Costs......................6 Preliminary System Dynamics Modeling ...........102 Life Cycle Analysis............94 10..................... Public-Private Partnerships . 115 Appendix 1 : Workshop Participants...................................................3 Suggestions for TEA and LCA Approach (Workshop Results and Discussion).............................................

energy efficiency. the state of technology the current status of algae RD&D. and guide RD&D investment in algal biofuels. Workshop participants to evaluate the Roadmap for and deployment (RD&D) activities. academia. sustainable domestic biomass industry that The outcomes from the Workshop provided key inputs produces renewable biofuels. economic opportunities across the nation. energy supply for transportation liquid transportation fuels. The Program’s goals are driven by various federal policies and laws. the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) was enacted. Algal biofuels offer great promise in contributing to Every attempt was made to ensure that the Roadmap the Program’s vision.gov/algae2008pro/. Furthermore. Despite their potential. with national laboratories.S. A major objective of the reserves. and creates be found at http://www. to the development of this Algal Biofuels Technology enhances U. of which only 15 economic. academia. The RFS mandates blending of 36 billion This Roadmap presents information from a scientific. The full proceedings of the Workshop can on oil. Overview The Workshop was able to capture the participants’ The Biomass Program (Program) of the U. industry. at the University of Maryland-College Park. energy security. that both assesses the current state of technology and provides direction to the Program’s RD&D efforts. and policy perspectives that can support billion gallons can be produced from corn-based ethanol. intense competition for the world’s dwindling petroleum scale algal biofuels industry. held December 9-10. including the Energy Independence and Security Act a 60-day public comment period was held to allow of 2007. In doing so. agencies. 1. of a viable. provides environmental benefits. bioproducts and biopower. and criticisms not captured during the Workshop. Department experience and expertise during a series of technical of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and break-out sessions that spanned critical aspects of the Renewable Energy is committed to advancing the vision algal biomass supply chain and cross-cutting issues. in partnership fidelity and incorporate new information. To accomplish its goals. Following the release of the initial draft of the Roadmap.1. it lays for producing algal biofuels is regarded by many in the groundwork for identifying challenges that likely the field to be in its infancy and there is a considerable need to be overcome for algal biomass to be used in amount of RD&D is needed to achieve affordable. as well as made provisions that Workshop. the Program has undertaken a diverse portfolio of research. development. scalable. While Biofuels derived from algae can meet these l onger-term addressing the potential economic and environmental needs of the RFS and represent a significant opportunity benefits of using algal biomass for the production of to impact the U. Overview  1 . 1. the combustion of petroleum- Workshop was to gather the necessary information based fuels has created serious concerns about climate to produce an algal biofuels technology roadmap change from the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. and non-governmental organizations. representing a diverse range of expertise from promote the use of renewable fuels. the national laboratories. The Workshop was organized by the Biomass Program to rising energy demand in many rapidly developing discuss and identify the critical challenges currently countries around the world is beginning to create hindering the development of a domestic. government and new energy technology research and development. the Roadmap describes fuels. The The legislation establishes production requirements for Workshop provided a stimulating environment to explore domestic alternative fuels under the Renewable Fuels topics affecting the development of algal biofuels industry. viewpoints. as well as helping to meet the development process was transparent and inclusive. reduces our dependence Roadmap.S.1). and industry. commercial. All comments are noted in the Appendix of this document. the United The framework for National Algal Biofuels Technology States is becoming increasingly dependent upon foreign Roadmap was constructed at the Algal Biofuels sources of crude oil. and sustainable algal-based biofuels. the production of economically viable biofuels. In 2007. approximately two-thirds of its petroleum. 60% of 2008. gallons of renewable fuels by 2022. The United States currently imports Technology Roadmap Workshop. Standard (RFS) that increase over time (Exhibit 1.1 America’s Energy Challenges About the Roadmap As global petroleum supplies diminish. Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) mandate established within EISA. which set new standards for More than 200 stakeholders were convened at the vehicle fuel economy. The which is used for producing transportation fuels.orau.S.

95 2011 0. and approximately 5 times that of oil palm fuels for aviation and ground transport.Advanced biofuels face significant challenges in meeting the ambitious targets set by EISA.0 billion gallons.1 Renewable Fuel Standard volume requirements (billion gallons) Cellulosic biofuels and biomass-based diesel are included in the advanced biofuel requirement. Significant acreage and productivity will be required • Minimizes competition with conventional agriculture for biomass production to generate sufficient feedstock • Utilizes a wide variety of water sources to meet the RFS mandates. CELLULOSIC BIOMASS-BASED ADVANCED BIOFUEL TOTAL RENEWABLE BIOFUEL DIESEL REQUIREMENT FUEL REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT 2009 N/A 0. while algae may co-products within biorefineries offer comparable biomass productivity as lignocellulosic feedstocks – the key biomass resource factored in the study.75 18.5 a 13.5 a 18.2). 2009). the study did not explore the potential of algae. The most promising among these are routes from soybeans.65 0. offer significant advantages that complement traditional feedstocks towards these fuels.0 26.0 a 11.0 30. advanced biofuels must demonstrate GHG emissions UNIQUE ADVANTAGES OF ALGAL FEEDSTOCK FOR across their life cycle that are at least 50% less than GHG ADVANCED BIOFUELS emissions produced by petroleum-based transportation • High area productivity fuels. microalgae have demonstrated potential oil yields that are significantly higher than the yields of oilseed crops Many pathways are currently under consideration for (Exhibit 1.2 2013 1.0 2018 7.55 2014 1.25 a 7. 2005).1 0. b To be determined by EPA through a future rulemaking.25 0.5 2016 4... approximately 15 times more productive to advanced biofuels such as high energy density fungible than jatropha. As required by EISA. For example.75 16. Cellulosic feedstocks were • Recycles stationary emissions of carbon dioxide identified by the Billion Ton Study as a significant source • Compatible with integrated production of fuels and of biomass (Perlack et al.0 2023 b b b b a To be determined by EPA through a future rulemaking.0 a 2.0 33.0 2020 10.5 a 9.0 a 5.0 36. However.0 2019 8.0 a 21. but no less than 1.0 28.35 13.25 2017 5.95 2012 0.0 24. Potential oil yields from certain algae production of biofuels and bioproducts from components strains are projected to be at least 60 times higher than of biomass. Algal biomass may per acre of land on an annual basis (Rodolfi et al.95 12.0 2.25 22.0 15.5 0.1 2010 0.0 2022 16. 2 1.75 a 3.6 11.15 2015 3. Overview  .80 1.0 2021 13.5 1. oleaginous Exhibit 1.5 20.5 a 15.

including power plants and the oil embargo of the early 1970s and the energy price other industrial emitters.S.. northwestern. 1. Many of the strains were isolated from shallow. a comprehensive overview Algae 1. formerly the Solar Energy Research Institute). inland saline habitats that typically The advantages of algae as a feedstock for bioenergy undergo substantial swings in temperature and salinity. process development. The isolates were screened for their tolerance to variations Although.500b of the project was completed (Sheehan et al. Various reports during the 1950s • Algae can utilize waste water. and also for their ability not yet emerged. Advances were made through algal strain isolation and characterization. In 1998. a Adapted from Chisti (2007) b Estimated yields. with projected costs for fossil fuels. comprehensive research efforts to date on fuels from microalgae. however. freshwater supplies. pH. this idea ultimately became a major push of DOE’s Aquatic Species Program. The program lasted from 1978 until 1996 and supported research primarily at DOE’s National Exhibit 1. genetic Jatropha 202 engineering.000-6. Some of the highlights are described briefly below. 1998). Approximately $25 million (Sheehan. There are several started in the late 1950s when Meier (1955) and Oswald aspects of algal biofuel production that have combined to and Golueke (1960) suggested the utilization of the capture the interest of researchers and entrepreneurs around carbohydrate fraction of algal cells for the production of the world: methane gas via anaerobic digestion. dates back to the 1940s. primarily green algae (Chlorophyceae) and diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). have been apparent since the mid-twentieth century. A detailed engineering analysis by Benemann et al. and demonstration- scale algal mass culture. 1998) was invested during the 18-year Soybean 48 program. earlier studies have laid foundational to produce neutral lipids. 1.2 Comparison of oil yields from biomass feedstocksa Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL. such saline water. gained serious attention only during from stationary sources. and temperature. but the focus changed to Camelina 62 liquid fuels (biodiesel) in the early 1980s.000 strains of microalgae over a seven-year period from various sites in the western. The discovery that • Algae cultivation strategies can minimize or avoid many species of microalgae can produce large amounts of competition with arable land and nutrients used for lipid as cellular oil droplets under certain growth conditions conventional agriculture. The Aquatic Species OIL YIELD Program also funded research at many academic CROP (GALLONS/ACRE/YR) institutions through subcontracts. • Algal biomass is compatible with the integrated biorefinery vision of producing a variety of fuels and The Aquatic Species Program represents one of the most valuable co-products.Advantages of Algal Feedstocks Early Work to 1996 Algae can be preferred feedstock for high energy density. commercially viable system has in salinity. Overview  3 . The concept of utilizing the lipid stores as a source of • Algae can recycle carbon from CO2-rich flue emissions energy. to the 300 most promising strains. surges through the decade. representing a diversity of aquatic Algal Biofuels Development environments and water types. The collection was narrowed approaches to the technologies being explored today. this report The Aquatic Species Program researchers collected more than 3. Techno-economic analyses Oil palm 635 and resource assessments were also important aspects of the program. During the early years. and and 1960s indicated that starvation for key nutrients. thereby reducing competition for limited as nitrogen or silicon. Proposals to use algae as a means of producing energy fungible liquid transportation fuels. the emphasis was on using algae to produce hydrogen. (1978) indicated that algal • Algal productivity can offer high biomass yields per systems could produce methane gas at prices competitive acre of cultivation. a scalable.2 A History of Domestic and southeastern U. Sunflower 102 studies of algal physiology and biochemistry. could lead to this phenomenon. produced water.

depth research.. New Mexico. biosynthesis of the storage carbohydrate. but studies examined the ability of many strains to induce failed to fully address the scale. or engine testing was carried out. and the efficiency of CO2 1995). Cyclotella cryptica. 1988). chrysolaminarin saline water. and thus the enzyme was extensively University of California-Berkeley. biomass was demonstrated. 1998).g. 1988) with the hope of eventually turning down the Sufficient resources were identified for the production flow of carbon through these pathways. (Weissman et al.000 m2 outdoor.. 1996). it became clear that novel solutions would be of aquifers. Different cost process step that is highly energy. A Test Facility in Roswell. In addition. analyses led to differing conclusions on fuel cost. studying Program and shown to be one of the less challenging this response led to valuable insights into the mechanisms aspects of the technology.S. but no further fuel much as 60% of their dry weight in the form of lipid. but overall biomass productivity averaged no effect was seen on lipid production in these preliminary around 10 g/m2/day with occasional periods approaching experiments (Jarvis et al. petroleum consumption. Under Aquatic Species Program subcontracts. the commercially viable strains for oil production. In this species. 50 g/m2/day. Sheehan et al. as biosynthesis of these compounds competes for fixed carbon units that might otherwise be used for Several resource assessments were conducted under the lipid formation. biological productivity was shown to have commercialization of the technology. and environmental lipid accumulation under conditions of nutrient stress. primarily triacylglycerides (TAGs) (Chisti. 1985).and capital-intensive. Studies focused on suitable land. cryptica were characterized (Roessler.. Conversion of Although nutrient deficiency actually reduces the algal oils to ethyl.. an oleaginous diatom. was the focus demonstration-scale outdoor microalgal cultivation of many of the biochemical studies. cost. 1999. some process options (e. and New Mexico under conditions of insufficient silicon (a component of (Sheehan et al.After promising microalgae were identified. For example. shallow (10-20 cm for TAG synthesis. stable production of algal successful transformation of microalgae (Dunahay et al. Of particular note was the Outdoor the cell wall) is a trigger for increased oil production. Cost-effective methods of harvesting the necessity for very low-cost culture systems. Hawaii. This catalyzes the first step in the biosynthesis of fatty acids used facility utilized two 1. Detailed techno-economic analyses underlined process steps. smaller ponds for inocula production. scale-up. and CO2 resources (power plants). ACCase activity was found to increase deep).. The systems were characterized (Roessler. but lower oil producing. it became possible to manipulate the expression of utilization (bubbled through the algae culture) was shown ACCase in an attempt to increase oil yields. estimated costs for unextracted 1998). 1987 and in desert regions of the Southwest (Maxwell et al. Inc. distance from CO2 point sources. Under inducing conditions. suggesting that the of the Aquatic Species Program in 1996 halted further technology could have the potential to have a significant development of these potentially promising paths to impact on U. further Aquatic Species Program focused on solvent systems. Extraction of oil droplets from the cells and algal oil were determined to range from $59 . 1989). strains from the wild. as unlined open ponds (Benemann and Oswald. The raceway design suggesting that it may play a role as a “spigot” controlling was based on the “high rate pond” system developed at lipid synthesis. however. enzymes involved in the Aquatic Species Program. growth was conducted in California. 2007). but Among various techniques. and other needed for biological productivity and various problematic issues. One serious problem encountered was that the desired starting strain was often outgrown by faster Additional studies focused on storage carbohydrate reproducing. purification. issues associated with such methods. production. characterization. 1990).. However. Overview  . Harvesting is a the single largest influence on fuel cost. productivity improvements. harvesting via flocculation even with optimistic assumptions about CO2 credits and was deemed particularly encouraging (Sheehan et al. Low attempts at metabolic engineering identified a pathway to nighttime and winter temperatures limited productivity in modify the gene encoding in the ACCase enzyme. The 4 1. the Roswell area.$186 per purification of the oil are also cost-intensive steps. operated by key enzyme is acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase). The termination of many billions of gallons of fuel. 1990).. other biofuel of lipid biosynthesis. These initial to be more than 90% with careful pH control. plus several under the nutrient stress conditions (Roessler. which Microbial Products. 1998).or methyl-esters (biodiesel) was overall rate of oil production in a culture (because of the successfully demonstrated in the Aquatic Species concomitant decrease in the cell growth rate). paddlewheel-mixed raceway ponds. conversion of lipids to gasoline) species in the collection were shown to accumulate as were evaluated (Milne et al. such and dewatering algal biomass and lipid extraction.. costs of these resources can vary widely depending During the course of the Aquatic Species Program upon such factors as land leveling requirements. and conversion to fuel are critical to successful In addition. primarily in C.. With the advent of the first successful in that long-term.

In contrast to the development of cellulosic biofuels which benefit from a direct agricultural and process Research from 1996 to Present engineering lineage. that include investigating microalgae. State funding programs and research support from private Technology and Analysis Challenges industry also make up a significant proportion of research funding. 1987). However. and Biomass Program are all funding research activities By reviewing the technology gaps and cross-cutting needs. Overall. needed to support commercialization activities. macroalgae for biofuels and beneficial re-use of CO2. DOE sponsored the Marine Biomass 1. a research initiative to determine the technical and economic feasibility of macroalgae cultivation and Opportunity and Challenges conversion to fuels. particularly to substitute natural gas Today (SNG) via anaerobic digestion (Bird and Benson. it also became clear that significant barriers would need to be overcome in order to achieve an economically feasible process. regulations and standards. which was trading at less than $20/barrel in 1995. affordable. Primary efforts were focused on open ocean culture of Abundant. such as a major Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency solicitation. Office of Fossil Energy. It was concluded that algal biofuels would not be cost-competitive with petroleum. and public-private partnerships. it was Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) algal bio-jet determined that a great deal of RD&D is still necessary program. feedstock mix for producing advanced biofuels. In particular. policymakers. federal agencies.gov/publications. suggest that the algae-to-biofuels process so it can be commercialized. Cyclotella cells. a number of U. cyanobacteria.. federal funding for algal research has come scale.barrel (Sheehan et al. the work highlighted the need to understand and optimize the biological mechanisms of algal lipid accumulation and to find creative. and the private sector in implementing a nationally coordinated effort toward Additionally. there is no parallel agricultural Since the end of DOE’s Aquatic Species Program in enterprise equivalent for cultivating algae at a similar 1996. and the Roadmap aims to guide researchers and engineers. A sizable and strategically structured investment from DOE. Office of Science.S. these activities must be accompanied with DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy conducive developments on the non-technical fronts – (ARPA-E). Private investment in algal biofuels This Roadmap seeks to lay down the first comprehensive has been increasing at a dramatic rate over the last few state of technology summary for fuels and co-products years. Overview  5 . the Aquatic Species Program was successful in demonstrating the feasibility of algal culture as a source of oil and resulted in important advances in the technology. Species Program. the Department of Defense. cost-effective solutions for the culture and process engineering challenges. Recent initiatives. and the Department of Agriculture. Also from 1968-1990. Further. national labs are developing a viable and sustainable algal biofuel industry. funding levels are beginning to increase. Detailed results from the Aquatic Species Program research investment are available to the public in more than 100 electronic documents on the NREL Web site at www. and sustainable feedstocks are the California kelp. significantly outpacing government funding. Similar to the findings of the Aquatic lifeblood of the burgeoning biofuels industry today. Courtesey of CCMP. the National to tackle the challenges of algal biofuels is thus Science Foundation. Additionally. the Air Force Based on the information provided at the Workshop. from algal feedstocks and to document the feasibility and techno-economic challenges associated with commercial scaling up of processes.3 Algae-to-Biofuels: Program. researchers concluded that algal-derived Algae must be considered as part and parcel of the SNG would not be cost-competitive with fossil fuel gas. 1. increasingly focusing on algal biofuels research. and several DOE Small Business Innovative to reduce the level of risk and uncertainty associated with Research (SBIR) request for proposals.nrel. 1998).

and bioproducts under different storage and transport scenarios for INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE Distribution contamination.. biofuel. sonication.g.. and end-product variability and Utilization • Optimize distribution for energy and costs in the context of facility siting • Comply with all regulatory and customer requirements for utilization (e. 6 1. bioplastics. and secretion) Extraction and • Achieve high yield of desired intermediates. industrial enzymes. solvent systems. and thermal management PURSUING STRATEGIC R&D: TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS Given the multiple technology and system options and their interdependency. climate. an integrated techno-economic modeling and analysis spanning the entire algae to biofuels supply chain is crucial in guiding research efforts along select pathways that offer the most opportunity to practically enable a viable and sustainable algae-based biofuels and co-products industry. sedimentation. direct fuel production.. Overview  . biogas.e. water. animal/fish feeds. and durability Conversion • Reduce contaminants and reaction inhibitors • Minimize process energy intensity and emissions over the life cycle • Achieve high conversion rates under scale-up conditions • Identify and evaluate the co-production of value-added chemicals. biochemical conversion. and nutrients • Identify and address environmental risks and impacts • Investigate multiple harvesting approaches (e. phototrophic. and separations CONVERSION CONVERSION • Investigate multiple approaches to liquid transportation fuels (e. activity. and coastal/off-shore systems. high-throughput screening technologies Algal Biology • Develop open-access database and collections of existing strains with detailed characterization • Investigate genetics and biochemical pathways for production of fuel precursors • Improve on strains for desired criteria by gene manipulation techniques or breeding FEEDSTOCK • Investigate multiple approaches (i.g. heterotrophic. flocculation.. selective extraction. and anaerobic digestion) Fuel • Improve catalyst specificity. stability.. subcritical water.g..g. preserve co-products Fractionation • Minimize process energy intensity • Investigate recycling mechanisms to minimize waste • Address scaling challenges. engine performance and material compatibility) • Assess and characterize land. including quality and safety trials to meet applicable standards • Characterize algal biomass. pressure. lipids) • Sustainably and cost-effectively manage the use of land. dissolved air floatation. filtration. open. water. and nutrient resource requirements for siting of microalgae Resources (heterotrophic & photoautotrophic) and macroalgae production systems and Siting • Integrate with wastewater treatment and/or CO2 emitter industries (in the case of heterotrophic approach) • Address salt balance. energy. energy balance. closed. OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ALGAL BIOFUELS: TECHNOLOGY GOALS PROCESS R&D CHALLENGES STEP • Sample strains from a wide variety of environments for maximum diversity • Develop small-scale. supercritical fluid. and mechanized seaweed harvesting) Harvesting and • Minimize process energy intensity Dewatering • Lower capital and operating costs • Assess each technology option in terms of overall system compatibility and sustainability • Investigate multiple approaches (e. centrifugation. water & nutrient reuse. and materials from algal remnants (e.g. FEEDSTOCK and mixotrophic growth) Algal • Achieve robust and stable cultures at a commercial scale Cultivation • Optimize system for algal productivity of fuel precursors (e. intermediates.. thermochemical/catalytic conversion. weather impacts. hybrid. side reactions. such as operational temperature. fertilizers. microwave. and surfactants) Co-products • Optimize co-product extraction and recovery • Conduct market analyses. carrying capacity. energy.g.

Appl. C.J. & Roessler. with shape-selective zeolites.. NTIS# H CP/ T. Available at: [Accessed November 3.US Patent 5928932 Abstract. References Benemann. 219-232... J. Pursoff. 1960. consumption standards.D. Biotechnology Advances. & Oswald. Microbiol. Journal of Phycology.. Biomass.. P. W. N.G. Evans. Effects of silicon deficiency on lipid composition and metabolism in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica. Algal from multiple entities.Regulations and Standards Public-Private Partnerships While the Roadmap’s primary objective is to highlight A collaborative framework of public-private partnerships the technical challenges and opportunities associated offers an opportunity to jointly address the technological. Dunahay. & Nagle. Jarvis. such as research and development process to help ensure algae intellectual property rights. Being a nascent industry. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1955. However.G. Biological cycles in the transformation of solar energy into useful fuels. 223–242. Milne. regulation. Biodiesel from microalgae. it is recognized economic. Jarvis. 1. Also.R. R. 11. 1988. L. Adv. 1605(UC-61). E.. structuring public- biofuel developers need to foresee and understand the private partnerships for successful ventures is a challenge potentially applicable legal requirements early on in the in itself given the myriad issues and interests. 179–183. 1995. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. & Ohlrogge. 102(1). there are no existing standards for various aspects of algal biofuels production. Roessler. Isolated gene encoding an enzyme with UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and phosphoglucomutase activities from Cyclotella cryptica .. RD&D activities can inform further development of applicable laws and standards. E. 100–112. 2009]. Catalytic conversion of microalgae and vegetable oils to premium gasoline.B. 91. Roessler. et al. biofuels and co-products) comply with applicable workforce needed to allow this industry to grow.G. Oswald.. 25(3). Phycol. Biological transformation of solar energy.J. ORNL/TM-2006/66.. 1004–1011.A. TN. R. P. However.e. 1999. 394–400. 1990. Y. with algal biofuels commercialization. 2008. and policy.. 2005. Overview  7 .G. W.. 1993. 2007. Rodolfi. 21(3). T. & Golueke.J. Oak Ridge. P. induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. T.. 24. J. and policy and regulatory challenges as that RD&D activities need to be carried out under a resolution of these issues will likely require participation framework of standards..G. Genetic transformation of the diatoms Cyclotella cryptica and Navicula saprophila. Chisti. 1978. P. Solar Energy Research. & Roessler. 31(6). 294–306. Biotechnol Bioeng. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Perlack.L. Cloning and characterization of the gene that encodes acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in the alga Cyclotella cryptica. Microalgae for oil: strain selection. supporting education are legally and safely developed and the end-products will be critical to create intellectual talent and the (i. Meier. J.E.. P. Engineering Design and Cost Analysis of a Large-Scale Microalgae Biomass System.. Final Report to the US Energy Department. et al.. R.

Because of Isolation and Characterization of morphological similarities when comparing many algal Naturally Occurring Algae species. and measuring the productivity of analysis tools.1 Strain Isolation. lipids. lakes. Because all of these parameters habitats ranging from freshwater to brackish water. and though find application in biofilm-based production facilities. tolerance to environmental variables (temperature. Screening Criteria and Methods new strains should be isolated from a wide variety of An ideal screen would cover three major areas: growth environments to provide the largest range in metabolic physiology. The term growth physiology encompasses a number of parameters such as maximum specific growth rate. (seaweeds).e. can include public lands as well as various sites within many strains also secrete metabolites into the growth our national and state park systems. which includes fresh. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data and and carbohydrates. actual strain identification should be based on The goals of algae isolation and screening efforts are to molecular methods such as rRNA sequence comparison. and new approaches are needed to develop Sampling strategies should not only account for spatial screening methods for extracellular materials. brackish. and soil (Round. Planktonic algae may be used photosynthesis and live in aquatic habitats. products. In all cases. and strain robustness. macroalgae For isolation of new strains from natural habitats. high-throughput automated isolation techniques involving Screening and Selection fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) have proven to be extremely useful (Sieracki et al. oxygen levels. coordinated to ensure broadest coverage of environments and to avoid duplication of efforts. type and strain of algae being cultivated will ultimately However. algae are organisms from different kingdoms of life. Traditionally. 2004). and generation. versatility possible.or eukaryotic. For large-scale sampling and isolation efforts. metabolite production. some algal strains take weeks to months to affect every step of the algae to biofuels supply chain. a helpful screen for oil production would terrestrial environments in a variety of geographical allow for distinction between neutral and polar lipids. cultivation and strain development. other gene markers. Ecosystems to be sampled could include the organism regarding metabolites useful for biofuels aquatic (i. within an aqueous habitat. pH. maps. this is not always the case. salinity. The selection of specific locations can be determined by sophisticated site Screening for metabolite production may involve selection criteria through the combined use of dynamic determining the cellular composition of proteins. they typically live in aquatic environments and are capable of photosynthesis. or identify and maintain promising algal specimens for in the case of closely related strains. streams. Collection sites and would provide fatty acid profiles. see Anderson. Algae can be in suspended mass cultures. and Algae can be isolated from a variety of natural aqueous nutrient requirements.2. locations to maximize genetic diversity. oceans. 2005). Algae include Isolation Techniques microalgae (unicellular eukaryotic organisms). Natural Habitats maximum cell density. questions medium. large-scale sampling efforts should be all parameters simultaneously would be helpful. acidic and alkaline environments) and For example.. the development and hyper-saline environments. rivers.. ponds. Furthermore. the enrichment cultures (Andersen and Kawachi. 2005). and cyanobacteria (historically known as traditional cultivation techniques may be used such as blue-green algae). of automated systems that provide information regarding Furthermore. Algal Biology The term “algae” commonly refers to a diverse mix of Additionally. Some of these could prove to be valuable co- of ownership of isolated strains should be considered. Due to their diverse characteristics. distribution but also for the temporal succession brought about by seasonal variations of algae in their habitats. Because it is not yet known how algae will be cultivated on a mass scale. Algal Biology  . typically found in planktonic (free floating) and benthic algae have been unified based on their ability to carry out (attached) environments. be isolated by traditional methods (for a comprehensive review of algal culturing techniques. 2. 8 2. whereas benthic algae may single or multi-cellular and pro. CO2 levels). The exact screens employed would depend geothermal springs. on the cultivation approaches and fuel precursor desired. marine require significant experimental effort. hypersaline. 1984).

National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton at the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences in West Boothbay At this time. native al. to determine a strain’s robustness. community stability.000 strains.500 strains. Previous robustness of particular existing strains. Environment and strain history (specific habitat. 2003). 1959). such as growth rate and metabolite properties. and susceptibility to more detailed information on growth. such as mating capability or versatility regarding productivity. but it requires a significant quantity of biomass (Ahlgren et it would be prudent to consider the isolation of new. Therefore. Solvent extraction.. de la Jara et al. toxicity) Currently. is the most nutrient requirements. At present. Culture collections are necessary to preserve the diversity preservation) of natural habitats. they could potentially are rapid screening procedures necessary for the biofuels serve as nuclei for the development of national algae field. They may also 7. it will be important to isolate a wide as a single cell). Transcriptomics. but could prove extremely useful for the identification resource centers. Protection of intellectual property in private or Metabolomics) 2. pathogenicity. it has not yet been established if these variety of algae for assembly into a culture collection that methods are valid across a wide range of algal strains (Elsey will serve as a bioresource for further biofuels research. temperature. only a few major collector) algal collection centers exist in the United States and 4. The function of a culture collection often 6. Strain administration (number in collection. Some minimal growth information is available from includes parameters such as culture consistency.For mass culture of a given algal strain. ) (Bligh and Dyer. small-scale simulations of mass A number of algal strains are currently available from culture conditions will need to be performed. metabolites. Further improvements in analytical methodology could be made through the As the major culture collections already collect and development of solid-state screening methods. Strain name (species. with more than 2. and predators present in a given environment. Growth conditions (media. biochemical. germination conditions cryopreservation. open access repository could accelerate do not always perform similarly in outdoor mass R&D of algae-based biofuels production systems. valuable strains. et al. It could also reduce dissemination of detailed information about potentially the number of redundant screens of algal species.. To obtain versatile and robust strains common method for determination of lipid content in algae. which data. Not only document data on strains. and breeding and metabolic engineering approaches to improve though these methods require much less biomass (as little biofuels production. Mutants biology. Proteomics. pH) & support research on determining strain characteristics. Omics data (Genomics. subspecies name. Culture collection organizations of species (particularly in mixed field samples) necessary could be responsible for the gathering and for the future of algal ecology. taxonomy. existing culture collections. and provide 3. The culture collections such as UTEX (The Culture Collection development of small-scale but high-throughput screening of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin. However. Information could include: 1.. molecular. with technologies is an important step in enabling the testing about 3. for example. Fluorescent methods strains directly from unique environments. no central database exists that provides global 9. For both direct using lipid-soluble dyes have also been described. it is also industry has further exacerbated the flow of relevant strain important to consider the strain’s robustness. but it is very difficult to obtain resilience. or in connection with outside collaborators. The establishment studies revealed that algae strains tested in the laboratory of a central strain. the bottleneck in screening large numbers of Harbor. 1991. 1998). and CCMP (The Provasoli-Guillard of hundreds to thousands of different algal isolates. and phylogeny either by themselves 8.. Maine). algae stems from a lack of high-throughput methodologies because many of the strains in these collections have been that would allow simultaneous screening of multiple cultivated for several decades. Practical applications (general and industrial) information on the characteristics of currently available 10. Biological interaction (symbiosis. Algal Biology  9 . Texas). some may have lost original phenotypes. protect genetic material. algal strains. 2007. Role of Culture Collections as National reference) Algae Data Resource Centers 2. basic research resources. that can be used for mass culture in biofuels applications. cultures (Sheehan et al. other countries. Strain properties: Cytological. They currently maintain thousands & screening results of different algal strains and support the research and industrial community with their expertise in algae 5. Plasmids and Phages transcends simple depository functions.

Botryococcus was shown in the Aquatic Species Program that not all braunii). an abundance of exported lipids could feasible. carbohydrates. Finally. Resistance to predators and be attractive attributes of algal strains. there are two types of algal model harvesting step. In some species. A reasonable first approach to identify model species that are optimal for the production of a desired fuel is through a survey of the literature. 1998). contamination by undesired microbes living off the carbon Possible fuel types of interest could include H2. 2006). However. 2002). to providing information on basic cellular processes then collection of the atmosphere above the culture will regarding the synthesis of fuel precursors. of either intermediates or products into the growth medium could make these compounds vulnerable to contaminating Useful Algal Characteristics microbes for catabolism. However. Co-products could include pharmaceuticals manufacture everything from cancer drugs to high. In such a strain. there may be practical problems systems to consider studying: species or strains amenable to consider. such as. this is not generally a problem with well- isoprenoids. intermediate. Adapting if sustainable secretion could be achieved. in a practical sense. Species with sequenced genomes and transgenic secretion actually makes the product more readily capabilities are the most amenable to investigating cellular available. source. For example. However. Pilot-scale experimentation and further metabolic engineering is required to evaluate Culture stability over long periods will be a key to low cost possible advantages and disadvantages of secretion. or a screen of environmental isolates for species 10 2. Also the ability addition of supplemental carbon results in increased lipid to flocculate without addition of chemical flocculating accumulation (Xu et al.volume/ (therapeutic proteins and secondary metabolites).. growth in both Targeting Desired Fuel Product or Intermediate light and dark periods is possible. Algal Biology  . it to secrete long-chain hydrocarbons (e. alcohols (either directly or established fully-heterotrophic fermentation technologies through biomass conversion). which will necessitate the use or strains with characteristics useful for large-scale of closed bioreactors. the number of algal systems that can be studied in depth has to be limited because a critical mass of researchers Secretion of Products or Intermediates is required to make progress on a given species. Also to be considered is whether growth. However. a large number of model and possible strain development for production. cellular metabolism is already geared toward production.cost commodities such as lysine and ethanol. although there are algae known processes since the basic tools are in place. Rapid growth is important both for overall productivity and the ability to compete with Capability for Heterotrophic or contaminating strains. If the carbon source is utilized by the cell. The ability of an algal species to secrete fuel precursors may be attractive because it could reduce or skip the cell In relation to biofuels. For example. 2006). secretion for lessons from the former to be applied to the latter. even under mixotrophic agents could reduce the costs of harvest as long as it could conditions where the substrate is not known to be be controlled to avoid settling in the cultivation system. if the desired product is volatile.g. supplements. transported into the cell (Ceron Garcia et al. or co-product to be produced.. but we cannot be certain that laboratory strains unfavorably alter fluidics properties or provide a carbon and production strains will be sufficiently related to allow source favoring growth of contaminants. they are still associated with the cells in a lipid strains that grow well in the laboratory are suitable for biofilm matrix. and high cell densities can be achieved. production of biofuels. or materials for nanotechnology (in the case of the silica cell wall of diatoms).. which simplifies characterization Given the diversity of algae. and thus are not free to form an organic large-scale culturing (Sheehan. food low. systems could be studied. viruses could also be a useful phenotype. or methane (via anaerobic that are currently deployed worldwide at massive scale to digestion). and species be necessary to isolate it. Even that other strains will be chosen for production. Other traits like the ability to grow to Mixotrophic Growth high cell density in continuous culture may allow a strain to be maintained while at the same time reducing the amount Heterotrophic or mixotrophic growth capabilities may of water to be processed daily. A potential disadvantage of the addition One consideration in choosing model systems is the of external carbon sources is the possibility of increased type of fuel. it is not clear the lessons learned from laboratory model strains to what the effect of a lipid emulsion in an algal culture would strains known to be capable of large-scale growth may be be. so it is possible hydrocarbon phase in solution (Banerjee et al. lipids.Selecting Algal Model Systems that naturally make abundant amounts of the desired for Study product.

Libourel and Shachar-Hill. Allen et al. accumulate large amounts of TAG (30-60% of dry weight). preventing it from et al. Krause and same precursors with the storage lipid TAG (Exhibit Weis. Nelson and Yocum. because it can be used to set achievable goals for 2009. 1999). and shares the Eberhard et al. which can lead to oxidative damage. carbon partitioning in algae is less understood biomass productivity values in the range of 100-200 g/ and research on how algal cells control the flux and m2/day have been presented (Chisti. a potentially important implication limitations of algal photosystems regarding light utilization.. In young Arabidopsis seeds The majority of light that falls on a photosynthetic algal and Brassica embryos.” Even with this photoprotection. 2002). More emphasis should be placed on understanding a general rule. carbohydrates. Regardless of the cultivation practices used 2. 2003. important to strain development and designing cultivation strategies. 2003). Lipids and carbohydrates. understand the metabolic pathways and processes that Understanding carbon partitioning will require extensive generate them in order to advance biofuels production. 2005. Schwender et al. Ruuska tend to absorb all the incoming light. the been done in plant systems to understand carbon flux in efficiency of photosynthesis is a crucial determinate biosynthetic and degradative pathways (Lytovchenko et al. 1994.. Under stress conditions such as high light or (Long et al. It is. some microalgae accumulate lipids In an effort to overcome this barrier. 2009. It is... Certain microalgal species also naturally the efficiency of light utilization (Polle et al. A fundamental understanding of both cultivation process design and strain improvement ‘global’ regulatory networks that control the partitioning projects. therefore. Though theoretical However. algae... 2002). biomass 2007. for biofuel production. Theoretical productivity is an important concept. the percent of biomass and Fernie.2. 2007). it was shown that such as triacylglycerols (TAG) as their main carbon storage reducing the size of the chlorophyll antenna can increase compounds. 1994. A large majority of and Biochemistry absorbed incident light is dissipated as heat and could be Many algae are photosynthetic organisms capable of considered “wasted. Metabolic networks have been reconstructed in various microbes from genomic and transcriptomic data. affecting growth rate.. under harvesting solar energy and converting CO2 and water to certain light regimes. Mcdermid and Stuercke. a link between starch and lipid metabolism has There are many good reviews available that cover basic been established.e. indicating that starch is an important storage reaching more distant cells (Christi. 2006. possible that TAG and starch could to maximize light exposure (see Chapter 3). and Niyogi. 2008).. starch transiently accumulated culture at greater than laboratory scale is not utilized. Even when compound and its synthesis precedes oil accumulation. knowledge of metabolic pathways. total dry weight (Mcdermid and Stuercke. studies in higher plants showed that when 2. 1994.. Yang et al. there remains be inter-convertible. cells nearer to the light source accumulation phase (Kang and Rawsthorne. 2003).2 Algal Physiology strategies to prevent the over-absorption of light energy. 2008). photoinhibition or the reduction O2 and organic macromolecules such as carbohydrates of photosynthesis due to light damage can still occur and lipids. that is the desired fuel precursor.. Cyanobacteria and macroalgae. although concentrations approaching 20% lipid have been reported Carbon Partitioning and Metabolism in some species (Chu et al. Starch is a common carbon and energy algal photosynthetic processes (Nelson et al. 2008. as 2008). plants (Hu et al. proteins. 2007 and 2008) Further. and predictive Photosynthesis and Light Utilization modeling (Vemuri and Aristidou. and exhibit photosynthetic efficiency and lipid production There is still much to learn about the dynamics and at least an order of magnitude greater than terrestrial crop regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus (Eberhard et al. are all potential biofuels lipids and/or carbohydrates could be very useful for biofuels or biofuel precursors. algal photosystems have built-in More recently. 1991)... It may be useful to carry out photosynthetic of carbon between alternative storage products will efficiency studies in algae similar to those that have be important for metabolic engineering of algae. however. 1994. accumulate mostly carbohydrates. in their productivity. there is no partitioning of photosynthetically fixed carbon into various current consensus on the true maximum productivity of groups of major macromolecules (i. and potentially. 2004. nutrient starvation. In and starch metabolism was most active before the lipid high cell density cultures. exposed to high light. 2002). along with biologically Knowing how and when carbon is partitioned in a cell into produced hydrogen and alcohols. been carried out for plants (Zhu et al.1). Foyer et al. therefore.... Algal Biology  11 . storage compound in plants and algae. Research has also When algae are cultivated photosynthetically. 2005). Sweetlove production. with lipid these processes if we are to better engineer the capture accumulation in macroalgae typically being less than 5% of and utilization of light energy for biomass production. 2007). and lipids) is critically needed (Boyle and Morgan. pathway analysis.

it is important to Primary Pathway for TAG Synthesis determine the predominate types that are present. and thus may play an for example. envelope similar to those of gram-negative bacteria. and and interaction with lipid metabolism in algae. degradation. Other abundant polysaccharides. An important lesson is the recognition of the diversity of algal polysaccharides and cell walls. Athenstaedt and Daum.. when trying to access DNA for genetic important role in determining the final acyl composition manipulations. the redox balance favors formation of pyruvate as the 1995).. Vigeolas et al. Cyanobacteria often store large quantities incorporation of the fatty acid into a glycerol backbone of glycogen (Chao and Bowen. The major pathway for the their main carbohydrate storage compound. accumulate significant quantities of neutral storage lipids Many green microalgae are plant-like. or fucoidin as 18 carbon fatty acids as precursors. for specific acyl CoA molecules. via three sequential acyl transfers (from acyl CoA) These major storage polysaccharides represent potential in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Exhibit 2. and complex carbohydrates that they use for carbon storage and cell structure.. many membrane lipids and/or carbohydrates to TAG have algal cell walls from different groupings are cellulose. an enzyme wall. the nature of the interaction is unknown. It could. 2002). Another important consideration in algal strains is the a third fatty acid is transferred to the vacant position 3 composition and structure of the polysaccharide cell of DAG by diacylglycerol acyltransferase. these phosphatase releases diacylglycerol (DAG). are 3-phosphate. 2006). Algal Biology  . Microorganisms capable of fermenting laminarin and TAG biosynthesis in algae has been proposed to occur mannitol from Laminaria hyperborea to ethanol have via the above Kennedy pathway described in plants. As mentioned above. greatly. Alternative pathways to convert from cells in mass culture. Fatty acids produced in the chloroplast are sequentially 2000a and 2000b). though their physical structure and the presence in an acyl CoA-independent way (Arabolaza et al. 1987). featuring rigid such as triacyglycerols (TAG). Cell walls can also be a technical barrier. while some algae lack synthesis. Several formation of TAG in plants first involves algae commonly use starch for energy storage. In the final step of TAG synthesis. accumulate well as of neutral storage lipids such as TAG.. or efficiently extracting biofuel precursors of TAG (Hu et al. for The synthesis of cellular and organelle membranes. If carbohydrates Lipid Synthesis and Regulation are to be used as fuel precursors. Diatoms are also unique among algae for the presence of silica in their cell walls.. 1988). use 16 or carbohydrates such as laminaran. recently been demonstrated in bacteria. be fruitful to Most cyanobacteria have a peptidoglycan layer and cell further research de novo starch synthesis. biochemical feedstocks for conversion to liquid fuels. mannitol. The acyltransferases be broken down into simpler sugars before conversion involved in TAG synthesis may exhibit preferences into biofuels. These structures can be an important source of that is unique to TAG biosynthesis (Lung and Weselake. 2004). 2000). However. some red algae and dinoflagellates. and the Algal Carbohydrates technical challenges these structures may present in strain Algae are incredibly diverse in the kind of simple manipulation. such an interaction has been also algae also have a thick extracellular matrix composed indicated by studies on the diatom Cyclotella cryptica of important products such as agar or carrageenan. therefore. Other algae. TAG is formed by food reserves. which are important cellulose-based cell walls and accumulating starch as potential fuel precursors. carbohydrates. While these results provide cellulose and have other polymers that provide structure an indication that starch synthesis is linked to lipid to the cell (Raven et al.1). must typically 2006. cell walls entirely. as example many brown algae and diatoms. resulting in the formation of the central considered less suitable for ethanol fermentation because metabolite phosphatidic acid (PA) (Ohlrogge and Browse. plants and yeast based. including de novo fatty acid synthesis in the stroma of plastids. Some red In microalgae. and extraction processes. (Roessler. Some algae. Yoo et al. feedstock potential. been identified and partially characterized (Horn et al. plant embryos or absence of other structural polysaccharides varies or seeds accumulated 40% less oil (Periappuram et al. transferred from CoA to positions 1 and 2 of glycerol- for example alginate found in many brown algae. 2008. Since polysaccharides may still prove useful as intermediates diglycerides are usually present in high amounts in rapidly to other types of conversion processes and final fuels. 12 2.. 2008). Dephosphorylation of PA catalyzed by a specific end product (Bird and Benson. 1992). but like those from plants. for example for fermentation to produce alcohols. There are also many algae that completely lack 2000..starch synthesis was impaired or inhibited. naturally or under stress conditions. are encased in a polysaccharide sheath (Hoiczyk and Hansel. 1971. growing cultures. it may be of interest to research these TAG intermediates.

Such pathways property of individual species or strains. Triacylglycerol Lipid Body Dahlqvist et al. Algal Biology  13 . Sheehan et al. PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase (putative pathways were proposed in dashed lines). how the Algae may possess multiple pathways for TAG synthesis. de novo fatty acid and lipid synthesis should Understanding lipid regulation can help to maximize be studied in order to identify key genes. as indicated by the presence and/or yields obtained from algal mass culture efforts fall absence of certain pathways and by the size of the gene short of the high values (50 to 60%) observed in the families that relate to various activities (Riekhof et al.. enzymes and new scenarios for lipid production and strain improvement. Similarly. DAGT PDAT? PDAT: Phospholipids: DAG acyltransferase. If this proves to have not yet been studied in algae. Accase: acetyl GDAT? CoA carboxylase. Glc6P: Phospholipids glucose-6-phosphate. pathways. CO 2 Glc6P Starch AGPPase Central Starch Glc6P 3-PGA 3-PGA Amylases Metabolic Pyruvate Mitochondria PDH CO 2 Pyruvate Oxaloacetate Acetyl -CoA Chloroplast ACCase TCA cycle Acetyl-CoA KAS I KAS II Glycolipids SAD Galactolipase? C16 . Diacylglycerol (DAG) ER: Endoplasmic reticulum. 2000.C18 CoA Figure 2. GDAT: putative Acetyl- glycolipids: DAG acyltransferase. 2004). if any. 2008. Because fatty acids are common precursors for the Alternative Pathways to Storage Lipids synthesis of both membrane lipids and TAG. Thus. These pathways are worth investigating to use information regarding lipid biosynthesis in plants when developing strains for improved lipid production. the de-novo Kennedy Pathway.. Stahl et al. involved in lipid metabolism in algae. algal cell coordinates the distribution of the precursors to and the relative contribution of these individual pathways distinct destinations or how the inter-conversion between to overall TAG formation may depend on environmental the two types of lipids occurs needs to be elucidated. the annotation of genes involved in lipid The regulation of the synthesis of fatty acids and metabolism in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii TAG in algae is relatively poorly understood.. it will be difficult galactolipids. laboratory (Hu et al. If the or culture conditions. This has revealed that algal lipid metabolism may be different lack of understanding may contribute to why the lipid from that in plants. As an example. such as phosphatidylcholine (PC) and strains to production strains. and other 2.. it could be a challenge to extrapolate information DAG can also be used directly as substrates for synthesis learned about lipid biosynthesis and regulation in laboratory of polar lipids. 2005). KAS: 3-ketoacyl-ACP. ACP: acyl carrier protein. PA and be true. Moreover. ER AGPPase: ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. 1998). Analyzing different algae could help ability to control the fate of fatty acids varies among algal to elucidate the possible pathways of TAG synthesis: the taxonomic groups or even between isolates or strains.. to develop hypotheses for strain improvement in algae. the potential pathway for lipid basal lipid and TAG content may represent an intrinsic formation from starch reserves mentioned earlier.1 Major pathways for fatty acid Phosphatidic acid and TAG synthesis in plants and algae 3-PGA: 3-phosphoglycerate.

β-carotene. therefore. Because of the potential importance of TAG play an important role for cell survival under stress. or with other organelles such as may be. to the obvious physiological role of TAG as a carbon and 2009). Zhekisheva et al. As mentioned Lipid Body Formation and Relationship earlier. sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (~15%) and the chloroplast under stress. there are now doubts about it relates to lipid formation and lipid trafficking. there have been relatively few studies on lipid glycerolipids assembled at the ER are then returned to bodies in algae compared with plants and fungi. It has been suggested that oleosins may be primarily Oxidative Stress and Storage Lipids associated with the stabilization of storage lipid bodies during the severe hydrodynamic stresses of dehydration Under environmental stress conditions (such as nutrient and rehydration that occurs in many seeds (Murphy. proteins.. Fatty acids can then Despite the economic importance of algae as a source of be either assembled into glycerolipids at chloroplast a wide range of lipophilic products. as an electron sink under photo-oxidative stress (discussed 2002).. the TAG synthesis pathway body accumulation occurs. Such work is also important in algae to distribution and their great abundance in many lipid- better understand the interaction among organelles as storing seeds. with acyl earlier). metabolism in algae. 1998. TAG synthesis may also phosphatidlyglycerol ( ~15%) (Harwood. Some acids. starvation). 14 2. Algal Biology  . and other macromolecules. in order algae under stress conditions (Hu et al. or astaxanthin) produced in cells under favorable growth conditions. with smaller amounts of digalactosyldiacylglycerol ‘sunscreen’ to prevent or reduce excess light from striking ( ~20%). and et al. the default pathway in some mitochondria and glyoxysomes/peroxisomes. 1993. In addition to load or discharge their lipid cargo (Zehmer et al. Carotenoid-rich lipid bodies serve as a (~50%). and other components into form of TAG. 2002). the structure and function of lipid However. which direct physical continuities between lipid bodies and may in turn cause inhibition of photosynthesis and damage bilayer membranes. the formation of fatty acids could help consume bodies. 1998). Current work in plants is understandable in view of their exclusive localization is focused on deciphering lipid transport across plastid on lipid-body surfaces. Huang. This and lipid fate (Benning. their apparently widespread envelopes. Under high light stress. the chloroplast stroma is the primary location to Other Organelles for fatty acid biosynthesis in plants. an important aspect of membrane formation the role of oleosins (Murphy.lipids (Alvarez and Steinbuchel. thereby serving as a mechanism to been proposed that these alternative pathways that convert “detoxify” these compounds and deposit them in the starch. Chloroplast membranes control the exchange of metabolites between the plastid and the cytoplasm. with growing evidence of induce over-production of reactive oxygen species. Lipid trafficking of lipid-body biogenesis in plants has focused largely on is. including vitamins. Nevertheless. 2008). cell division..and glyco. The molecules their lipid composition dominates extracts obtained from (e. and thus relax the over-reduced electron related to storage lipid formation requires further study. the exact relationship between oxidative stress. In order to better understand lipid to membrane lipids. as rapid lipid energy storage compound. and their interactions with other organelles excess electrons. Organelle Interactions and storage lipid formation warrants further study. Synthesis of Lipid bodies may dock with different regions of the ER TAG and deposition of TAG into cytosolic lipid bodies and plasma membrane. 2001). The study the plastid where they are assimilated. a close relationship is often may also play a more active and diverse role in the stress found between neutral lipids like TAG and the membrane response. transport chain under high light or other stress conditions. toxic fatty acids excluded from the membrane system the fate of these abundant lipids remains unclear. the role of oleosins in the biogenesis of plant lipid bodies.. some algal cells stop division and accumulate TAG as the main carbon storage compound. Algal chloroplasts the carotenoid pathway are sequestered into cytosolic contain monogalactosyldiacylglycerol as their main lipid lipid bodies. The thylakoids of chloroplasts are with secondary carotenoid synthesis in algae (Rabbani the main intracellular membranes of eukaryotic algae. lutein. 1992). 2008).potential pathways to convert membrane phospholipids and The TAG synthesis pathway is also often coordinated glycolipids into TAG. stress conditions on lipid production in algae. Under utilize phosphatidylcholine. with exceptions.g. and spatial.. membranes or they can be exported to the ER and hydrocarbons and very long-chain ω-3 and ω -6 fatty assembled into lipids for cellular membranes. excess membrane lipids. It has as acyl donors. excess electrons that and glycerol moieties exchanged between the different accumulate in the photosynthetic electron transport chain lipid classes. The de novo TAG synthesis pathway can serve phospho. This relationship may be both metabolic. In oil-producing microorganisms. phatidylethanolamine or stress conditions as degradation of chloroplasts occurs.

M. Glycolysis ADP ATP starch pyruvate Acetyl-CoA + CO2 NAD++H+ NADH PFOR NPQR NAD++H+ FD(ox) FD (red) -1. for example.0 PQ Cyt b CO2 Cyt f 0. 2009).2 P680 Two are driven by light and the third occurs in the dark. the light-driven pathways photosynthetic-electron-transport-coupled ATP production can either employ water (through photosystems II and (ATP is not required for H2 production). those and carbohydrates. Algal Biology  15 . Hydrogenases are the enzymes responsible for releasing molecular H2 (Ghirardi et al. and engineering their down-regulation during H2 independent.. 2008). (Drawing courtesy of Prof. would enzymes).8 Fx H2 Photosystem I P680* FA/FB FD H2ase Energy (Volts) -0. and a third. 2000. driven H2-photoproduction pathways. (c) engineering degradation (see Exhibit 2. light. (b) competition for photosynthetic reductant at the level of ferredoxin. Some microalgae and cyanobacteria can produce H2. carbon partitioning and lipid/carbohydrate synthesis in algae. 1984). Carbon is fixed under Photosynthesis normal photosynthesis with water as the donor. As a substrate..Besides biochemical analysis to study algal lipids 2007). (c) regulatory issues associated with the over production of ATP. fermentative H2 pathway coupled to starch production (Mathews and Wang. a These challenges could be addressed by (a) engineering potential fuel product. and (d) engineering I) or NADH from the glycolytic breakdown of stored the photosynthetic antenna pigment content for increased carbohydrate (through photosystem I).2 P700* A0 A1 -0. but the electron acceptor is switched at the level of ferredoxin (FD) from CO2 to protons under conditions that lead to H2 production. Three et al. In all pathways. One of the most important characteristics also help provide information about photosynthetic of hydrogenases is that they are O2 sensitive.2) (Melis et al.4 Pheo QA QB 2H+ Photosystem II 0. Colorado School of Mines ) 2.8 Chl 2H2O Figure 2. 2005). (b) identifying metabolic pathways that pathways have been described in green algae: two light. 2003). compete with hydrogenases for photosynthetic reductant. or Sequence Tag (EST) analysis. Posewitz. and (d) inefficiencies in Biohydrogen the utilization of solar light energy (Seibert et al. and proteomic studies. studies involving Expressed containing iron (which are generally H2-evolving)... efficiency of solar light utilization (Polle et al.→ O2 + 2H2. metabolic Four biological challenges limiting biohydrogen production engineering through genetic manipulation represents in algae have been identified: (a) the O2 sensitivity of yet another strategy for the production of algal oils. cDNA microarray both nickel and iron (which are generally H2-uptake analysis.4 PC Chl fixation P700 0. Either O2+2H+ water or starch can be the electron donor. ferredoxin (FD) is the primary electron donor to the hydrogenase enzyme. There are two major types of hydrogenases.2 Three different pathways for H2 production 1.. hydrogenases. Based on such information. in the following reactions: 2H2O hydrogenases with improved tolerance to O2 (Cohen + light energy → O2 + 4H+ + 4e. Gfeller the photosynthetic membrane for decreased efficiency of and Gibbs.

2002. Thus. the importance of being able to harness and synthetic components) and synthetic photosynthetic biotechnology approaches to generate algae with desirable systems that mimic the fuel-producing processes of properties for the production of biofuels and bioproducts photosynthetic organisms. human health. potentially generate strains with desirable characteristics. the unicellular non-N2-fixing cyanobacterium The Genetic Toolbox Gloeocapsa alpicola can evolve H2 from the fermentation Because biological productivity is a key driver for of stored glycogen (Serebryakova et al. Algal Biology  . examples of how algal biotechnology has been applied 1997). and to acetate. cyanobacteria Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142 (Toepel et and these are the subjects of Chapters 3 and 4. and CO2 (van der Oost et al. In order to fully realize the potential of H2 approaches. fungi and higher plants. (b) remove or down-regulate competing fermentative pathways thus directing more of the cellular flux toward H2 Mutagenesis production. All cyanobacteria examined thus far employ the relevant strains remains a significant technical hurdle. For algae that undergo sexual reproduction. several cyanobacteria tools available to modify algal strains. and algae genetically remain far behind those developed hydrogenase structure and function is required. for commonly used bacteria. 16 2. several challenges generations and the possibility of unintended horizontal must be addressed: (a) improve photosynthetic efficiency gene transfer to other organisms are important research to increase the yield of carbohydrate accumulation. Efforts should be undertaken to understand the fundamental To circumvent the inhibition of hydrogenase by O2. Some of these methods can also be used to study the It is well established that dark fermentation suffers from localization of gene products (mRNAs and proteins) low H2 molar yield (less than 4 moles of H2 per mol within cells. 2) describes were found to use pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase. fermentation is using modern analytical approaches will provide a wealth constitutive.. hydrogen evolution pathways. In cyanobacteria. accounting for their ability to adapt quickly of hypotheses for strain improvements. the ability to improve on native strains under non-N2 fixing condition.. al. biological process engineering breakthroughs directly tolerant hydrogenases (Ghirardi et al. 2009). Collectively. For all of these with ethanol. the hydrogenase from is a potentially important element in the research effort Cyanothece PCC 7822 produces H2 in the dark and toward algal biofuels. modify genes or gene expression in a particular organism. and (c) learn to express multiple hydrogenases The generation and characterization of mutants is a so that electrons from both ferredoxin (Fd) and NAD(P) powerful approach to understand gene function and H can serve as electron donors to support H2 production. more knowledge cannot be overlooked. 1989).. formate. Genetic approaches are commonly also excretes typical fermentation byproducts including used to introduce genes. methods to manipulate of photosynthesis. and the production of includes developing biohybrid (those with biological chemicals. and 3) highlights a few via nitrogenase or hydrogenase (Stal and Moezelaar. genetic toolbox that can be used to modify process- 1987). this subsection seeks to 1) address the genetic of glucose to pyruvate. the limited algal to changing environmental conditions (Stal and Krumbein. A possibility enabled new multi-billion dollar commercial enterprises to improve the efficiency of biological H2 production for agriculture.Recently there has been a focus on using cyanobacteria to 2.. the stability of the desirable trait through many production via indirect biophotolysis. they are typically more easily years of basic biology and genetics R&D. 2008) and Oscillatoria (Stal and Krumbein. using nitrogenase as the catalyst. 1998). 1987).. questions to consider in the context of mass production. Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway for degradation Thus. From here. 2005). While many of the challenges described above The biotechnology industry grew from more than 100 exist in these organisms. hexose) (Turner et al. genetic and cellular processes involved in the synthesis another option for H2 production is to take advantage and regulation of potential fuel precursors from diverse of the fermentation pathways that exist in some algae species of algae. Using hydrogenase as the catalyst. Methods to cultivate and process algae in photosynthesis has been demonstrated in the unicellular commercial settings are no less important to biotechnology. In all cases.3 Algal Biotechnology produce H2 (Tamagnini et al. 2008). However. to delete or disrupt genes. This is due to the production the toolbox allows traits to be recombined into a single of organic waste by-products described above along individual by mating parental strains. engineered than eukaryotic algae and have more O2. enabling technologies and analyses that can be applied which reduces ferredoxin for subsequent H2 production for biofuels and bioproducts. This temporal separation of H2 production from to date. using the carbon reserves biology of algal growth and metabolite accumulation produced during the day. Prince and Kheshgi. While a better understanding of the basic for H2 production at night. Similarly economic viability.

Dunahay et al.. Dunaliella. Tagging can be accomplished is inactivated enzymatically. For the latter. Targeted 1996... 1989). 1995). 2005).As long as an appropriate screening process is antibiotic use.g.. and to select for cells in which element that functions in the species of interest. spontaneous mutants arising from errors with increased antibiotic-resistant microbes. iterative be replaced in order to generate the phenotypic effect. However. The green algae (Chlamydomonas. Debuchy et al. or introduction of resistance can also be an important factor.. to be expressed at a higher level than the native gene (Nelson et al. Several in mapping the locus responsible for the phenotype. which could exacerbate current problems developed. constructs must be A powerful way to manipulate genomes is the ability to made to place the gene under control of an expression introduce DNA into the cell.g. 1989. 2002). the decision as to which antibiotic standard chemical or UV-based mutagenesis approaches. Phaeodactylum. there marker (Hasnain et al. 1985. kanamycin (Hasnain Targeted or tagged mutagenesis offers the advantage of et al. Marker systems that take advantage of the ability to genetically complement Transformation Methods auxotrophic and metabolism mutants have also been Gene transfer systems have been established in many achieved (Kindle et al. or through the larger numbers of transformants (Poulsen et al. Arthrospira). Most of the current selectable markers are derived to exhibit a characteristic phenotypic change that is easily from bacterial genes. 1999). Certain strategies can also enable changes antibiotic by the resistance protein. 1994).. ideally in well- (GE) algae—something that could be desirable for characterized genes that can be easily complemented. 1995). 1995). however.. 2. A direct comparison of the by introducing a selectable marker randomly into two has shown that the nourseothricin system generates the genome (Adams et al. 2006). Caveats are that the mutated gene may need staining (Cooksey et al. This Sophisticated metabolic engineering could require the can include either a requirement for mutants to grow under introduction of multiple selectable or complementary certain conditions (e. other approach is limited by the low frequency of naturally methods may need to be considered for production scale. this resistance is a powerful tool for research. important consideration is that the use of antibiotics in Synechocystis. but markers based on resistance assayed. Mutants are more readily generated by For research purposes. generated by conserved ribosomal protein mutations have e.. large-scale production has two major drawbacks. This the DNA is present. Anabaena. changes in fluorescence properties... antibiotic markers have been developed for microalgae. large-scale algal production. The second Volvox). first concern is the cost of the antibiotic. or that the native gene may need to Given a well-developed screening approach.. which necessitates a large amount of screening. also been successful (Del Pozo et al. whereas nourseothricin in gene expression. 1987) can be screening criteria. However. Typically.. a modified copy of the gene that inserts elsewhere into zeocin resistance requires stoichiometric binding of the the genome. selection marker to use includes whether the antibiotic Drawbacks of this approach include the introduction compound is sensitive to light and whether its potency is of multiple mutations in a genome and the difficulty modulated by the salinity of the growth medium. Hallmann and Rappel. use of transposons (Miller and Kirk. or markers. Nelson et or increased neutral lipid accumulation via Nile Red al. are examples of control elements that work across along with the DNA of interest on an extra-chromosomal evolutionarily diverse species (Dunahay et al. For example. 1994).. occurring mutations. The mechanism of antibiotic native gene is to be entirely replaced). in the presence of an antibiotic). Any mutagenesis approach requires an appropriate screening technique to enrich for and isolate mutants. An algal strains.. dinoflagellates (Amphidinium. zeocin (Apt et al. 1993. this is accomplished by typically involves using control elements from a introducing an antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable highly expressed gene in that species. simplified identification of the mutated gene. appropriate mutations must without the need to generate genetically engineered be generated in the species of interest.. Antibiotic in DNA replication can be identified. element called a plasmid.. diatoms (Cyclotella. concern is the environmental implications of widespread Thalassiosira). 1999). Navicula. Algal Biology  17 . Dunahay et al. presumably because requirements for expression levels of the gene are lower and less taxing to the cells. reduced chlorophyll fluorescence (Polle et al. Once an appropriate antibiotic resistance or Selectable Markers complementing gene is identified. including resistance to neomycin. 1985. Nostoc. Chlorella.. and nourseothricin approaches rely on homologous recombination (if the (Poulsen et al. For selection could be used to generate useful algal strains complementation approaches. 2006).. including cyanobacteria (Synechococcus.

use of single stranded DNA (Zorin et al. Dunahay. 1990). Sexual Crossing Breeding of desired characteristics from a number of RNA Interference (RNAi) phenotypic variants can allow for strain development RNAi can be a useful tool to down-regulate gene without creating GE algae. traits. 1998). For most of these approaches.. With the exception of cleaving specific mRNAs or sequestering them away Chlamydomonas. classical genetic approaches using from the ribosome (Valencia-Sanchez et al. crossed periodically to maintain culture viability. which can then subsequently affect algae algal transgenics and implications for biotechnology. Porphyra). only a small via homologous recombination is more desirable than percentage of selected transformants will have functional random integration because it can overcome phenotypic RNAi. Algal strains often contain expression. 1992).. Algal Biology  .. The selection process was based on a gene is present. and can be used to knockout genes.Symbiodinium). Many transformation methods also exist with nitrate in the growth medium. Gene replacement a selectable marker and an RNAi construct.. be desirable. (Deng and Capecchi. 1991) or silicon carbide whiskers (Dunahay. and another in which bidirectional only for a limited number of generations and must be transcription generates the double stranded RNA. used in a red alga (Ohnuma et al. In a practical but less so in microalgae. Homologous recombination-based gene integration although there is a recent report of the method being approaches are common in many strains of cyanobacteria. Control element strength can be evaluated Other successful methods include electroporation by monitoring mRNA levels by quantitative PCR or (Shimogawara et al.. 2005). RNAi operates “breed true” though a series of sexual crosses. especially in the study of polyploid organisms multiple copies of their genome. The nitrate reductase promoter has proven cell wall. including conjugation. 1988.. 1995). Gene Expression Control Elements Porphyridium. which is useful for both nuclear and chloroplast slightly elevated. high-throughput phenotypic screen for functional RNAi Successful recombination approaches have included the by co-targeting an amino acid synthesis pathway along addition of long flanking regions to the gene of interest with the desired gene of interest (Rohr et al. because it is induced could be applied. Identification of and biolistic approaches (Matsunaga and Takeyama... challenge to introducing DNA into a cell is the nature of allowing for precise control over the timing of gene the cell wall. 2005). intermediate. need for balance in cellular metabolism. 2005) and control translation by either 1950s (Bird and Benson.. Even on vectors containing both the genome (Dunahay et al. Frequently. transgenes are overexpressed by A common method for introducing DNA into algal cells using strong control elements. RNAi can inhibit transcription to improve commercial varieties of seaweed since the (Storz et al. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Undaria) and euglenoids (Euglena). electroporation. then chemically based methods of transformation useful in this regard in microalgae. reinhardtii. 18 2.. In addition. red algae (Cyanidioschyzon. 2001). RNAi approaches have been investigated primarily Homologous Recombination in the model green alga.e. vortexing with glass beads high throughput transcriptomics (i. Gracilaria. If methods exist to remove or perforate the expression. 2009). ammonium (Poulsen and Kroger. One solution to this problem was developed in dominance issues when more than one copy of the C. a fundamental can be actuated by simple manipulations are desirable. inducible and repressible promoters that 1993). microarrays). but considering the is the biolistic (“gene gun”) approach (Armaleo et al. small sizes and used to target suppression of specific and traditional mutagenesis and breeding has been used genes by base pairing. 1995). 2004). selecting for functional RNAi can be problematic of microalgal cells generally integrates randomly into (Fuhrmann et al. 1996). Many through double-stranded RNAs that are cut down to macroalgae species are capable of sexual reproduction. DNA introduced into the nucleus sense. and so recessive genotypes or when dealing with redundant genes where traditional may not manifest unless that genotype is allowed to genetic manipulations are difficult. or co-introduction of recombinase genes with the transforming DNA (Reiss et al. and repressed with for cyanobacteria. Two general types of RNAi vectors can be constructed but this methodology could prove to be extremely – one containing an inverted repeat sequence from the important. 2006). Some diatoms can be propagated vegetatively gene to be silenced. sexual crossing are not well developed in microalgae. transcriptional regulators) can modulate the levels Hallmann (2007) provides a comprehensive review of of mRNA. 1987).. (Kindle et al. brown algae Gene expression control elements (also known as (Laminaria.. other inducible or repressible control elements would be useful for both research and commercial applications. or reduced levels of expression may transformation (Boynton et al. 1993).

Green Eukaryotic algae constitute members from at least eight fluorescent protein and its derivatives are the most major phyla. approaches to modify proteins by genetic resources to allow for detailed analysis of the data. This information could be can be more challenging in repeat-laden genomes. 2004).org/euk_cur1.. Indeed. Although time families). pussilla. Gaietta et al. 2002). this level of regulation integrates the annotation (the assignment of gene functions or the proteome with the metabolome. Department of Energy) and for Ectocarpus siliculosus useful for applications. Genome size in algae can vary substantially. a pelagophyte (Aureococcus annophageferrens). This could 1 For a listing. engineering so that they function more efficiently or have other favorable characteristics could be valuable for the development of algal biofuels technology. cellular processes and regulation involved in Genome sequencing projects are also underway for the defining the attributes of the strain. reinhardtii. for which over 20 completed these methods have revolutionized the study of organisms genome sequences are available. obtaining a genome sequence should Regarding core cellular metabolic processes. distribution of DNA between the plastid and nucleus (Wilhelm et al. that the genomic data are only as useful as feedback.S. Bathycoccus sp. Volvox carteri). Together. forming the foundation for at Genoscope .Directed Evolution of Enzymes/Proteins reduced and more coverage is obtained in a shorter period of time. demonstrated utility and some possible advantages It is likely that the different symbioses have affected the (Regoes and Hehl. at least semi-quantitative evaluation of their abundance assembly of such data (especially with short read lengths) in a simple measurement. such as genomics. One reason for this variation is likely to be the accumulation Protein Tagging Technologies of repeated sequences in the larger genomes (Hawkins Tagging proteins with fluorescent markers is useful in et al. useful in monitoring intracellular metabolic processes associated with biofuel precursor production.). Algal species are being analyzed using these analytical and several diatoms (Phaeodactylum tricornutum. a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi). visit http://genome. Micromonas in ways and timescales that were never before possible. Sequenced genomes are an essential basis of information bioinformatics can represent the largest stumbling block for the interpretation of transcriptomic and proteomic to achieving that goal. 2006). will be essential Sequencing and Annotating Algal Genomes to make sequence data usable.. It must be noted level. so it will be important to provide sufficient consuming. with a special focus on classes or individual High throughput approaches. Fragilariopsis cylindrus). including allosteric activation and metabolic though. several picoeukaryotes helping biologists share and build upon experimental results (Osteococcus lucimarinus. a be strongly considered for any strains being developed substantial amount of regulation occurs at the protein for biofuels research or production. Even though new sequencing technologies determining their intracellular location and can provide readily enable accumulation of data for large genomes. 2008). transcriptomics. 2006). Bioinformatics analysis of sequenced genomes. If not properly done. have enabled in-depth analyses to be performed in a whole cell context. With the development of more powerful sequencing training should be established at the onset of activities methods.Centre National de Séquençage (France). all featuring a complex series of primary widely used and versatile protein tags. which could impact the regulation Enabling Technologies: “Omics” and processes of fuel precursor production. Quality standards and appropriate data. especially at the basic level of gene annotation. A genomic survey of representatives from all major algal classes is Approaches and Bioinformatics desirable. approaches to better understand the underlying Thalassiosira pseudonana.jgi-psf. in which costs have been substantially to ensure consistent and useful annotation..1 These species include computer sciences. the nuclear genomes both in culture and in natural habitats. species within classes that make abundant fuel precursors. Undoubtedly. Osteococcus tauris. These biological of only a handful of microalgal species have been fully advancements have been complemented by developments in or partially sequenced to date. Except for cyanobacteria. but others have and secondary endosymbioses (Falkowski et al.html 2. applied research and technology development.. even in closely related species (Connolly et al. Algal Biology  19 . and proteomics. creating the new field of bioinformatics unicellular green algae (C. a where powerful new databases and search algorithms are red alga (Cyanidioschizon merolae). 2005. the macroalga Porphyra purpurea at the Joint Genome Institute characterization of these cellular processes will prove (U..

2006. or can determine fuels and intermediates. sp. different metabolomic analysis tools are applied. and protein tagging are routine in some cyanobacterial systems. Lipid analysis is done using mass spectrometry of any algal biofuels technology development effort. These approaches not only enable protein atmospheric nitrogen and produce hydrogen. proteomic Synechocystis has been used extensively for the study of approaches can also help assess the metabolic potential of carbon metabolism toward production of hydrocarbon organisms that may be difficult to isolate. Nannochloropsis sp. small RNAs also play Genetic manipulation of cyanobacteria is generally major regulatory roles in algae (Bartel.. 2007) and should be applicable in cyanobacteria. double-homologous recombination.. Algal Biology  . Transcriptomics Lipids are a subset of the molecular repertoire of the While genome sequencing will be an important component algae cell.. For example. Chlorococcum sp. Both metabolomics and metabonomics may be important in terms of algal biofuels research. 1998). making them detection of post-translational modifications (Domon and attractive organisms for biofuels production. 2006). Moreover. In the absence of genomic information. but they are prolific carbohydrate and secondary approaches allow for robust evaluation of soluble and metabolite producers.. which is the quantitative Therefore.. high Quantitative comparison of lipid type and abundance are throughput sequencing technologies will also become critical components of lipid-based biofuels approaches as increasingly important because it will not only help lipid characteristics can determine the suitability of the with genome annotation (for example. Aebersold. Scenedesmus stimuli or genetic modification (Nicholson et al.. 1999). gas chromatography mass spectrometry. another dozen or so EST projects.include the standardization of using a particular sequencing Metabolomics and Lipidomics approach that provides sufficient coverage of ESTs to The metabolome is the collection of small molecular ensure accurate gene modeling. 1996). Some strains can double membrane-associated proteins in the form of protein quickly (less than 10 hours). and some strains can fix peptides. notable that while these projects represent a very useful There is a distinction between metabolomics.. 2007. there are still a large number of useful algal measurement of the dynamic multi-parametric metabolic species to sequence that are related to biofuels production. Applications of Biotechnology New. Tanner et al. which survey.. 2009).. Castellana et al. high-throughput sequencing technologies enable to Algal Bioenergy comprehensive coverage of transcripts and quantification of their relative abundance. and function. 2007). however. Many 20 2. and ultimately determines how a cell functions Cyanobacteria generally do not accumulate storage in response to the environment. quantitative transcriptome profiling using new. Small RNAs have been many of the tools developed for bacterial genetics are identified in microalgae (Zhao et al. approaches between related organisms and organisms maintenance. but also allow for protein quantification and many can be genetically manipulated. Comparative genomics weight compounds in a cell that are involved in growth. and proteins. in response to particular environmental conditions. The genome of this strain functional diversity of a community of organisms. spontaneous considered in investigations of gene expression regulation. Mass-spectrometry lipids. as well as spectrometry. identifying final fuel produced. the rationale for sequencing these organisms was involves the identification and analysis of metabolites. are underway. The cellular complement of proteins reflects its metabolic potential. 2008). Because the chemical that carry out similar functions can also help assign gene nature of metabolites varies more than for mRNA function and identify metabolic pathways of interest... was sequenced over a decade ago. Dettmer et al. 2004. 2005. and metabonomics. transformation. the first among photosynthetic organisms (Kaneko et al. Cerutti more advanced than that of eukaryotic algae because and Casas-Mollano. not related to lipid production or other biofuels efforts. Most transcriptomics approaches Cyanobacteria evaluate mRNA levels. approaches (Han and Gross.. identification. but it is also emerging as a variety of different cultivation regimes can also help inform robust approach for genome-wide expression analysis process engineering and improve yields (Yu et al. Monitoring lipid characteristics under a coding regions of DNA). especially with regard to translational regulation. and Pseudochlorococcum sp. and at least half a dozen selectable markers Proteomics are available for Synechocystis (Vermaas. including liquid chromatography mass Currently. at least10 other algal genomes. 2005). It is and nuclear magnetic resonance (Dunn et al. response of living systems to pathophysiological such as Dunaliella sp.

2007). However. 1998). The genome sequence pathways can be manipulated for the benefit of biofuels of Chlorella NC64A was recently completed. 2008). 2004). and chloroplast (PHB). which increases both growth PHB accumulates under nitrogen depleting conditions rate and lipid production. whereas glucosylglycerol and sucrose and some species are abundant lipid producers. algae with different extents of endosymbiosis (Wilhelm suggesting favorable growth rates for biomass production.home.. a comprehensive understanding due to codon bias (Heitzer et al. is at least partly regulated by nuclear-encoded given their ability to accumulate high amounts of lipids gene products. 1999). and because it has outstanding salt tolerance (from 0. and are highly diverse that could reduce the growth of possible contaminating (Falkowski et al. 2008). reported (Neupert et al. The latter is a production of other carbohydrate-based storage compounds. et al. C. Algal Biology  21 .. Dunaliella salina has several useful characteristics for large-scale biofuels production. with specialized structure and metabolism that function some of which await elucidation and development..photosynthesis and carbon metabolism mutants have been diversity of algae is important to identify species that generated. For example. 2007. Synechococcus as a model system for understanding the fundamentals of and Anabaena strains have been studied for their hydrogen lipid synthesis and regulation.jgi-psf. C. capabilities.1 M to near Unicellular eukaryotic microalgae are the product of saturation). Ferrante et al.. which occurs in the Diatoms were a major focus in the Aquatic Species Program chloroplast. including glycogen. protothecoides. RNA silencing of carbon metabolism and regulation is not yet available (Cerutti et al. For example. 2009) in Synechococcus. The genome sequence of D.. Relatedly. 2006). like the production potential (Tamagnini et al. 1997). salina is occurred during the evolution of microalgae. It is not an abundant ethanol (Deng and Coleman. Fulda et al. 2008). reinhardtii is the fact that nuclear expression of foreign genes is still problematic Despite all of the progress. 2006. filamentous strain that can form heterocysts.. It produces abundant Microalgae lipids (Weldy and Huesemann. fatty acid synthesis. In can accumulate under salt stress (Yoo et al. the understanding of how the production of different although the stability of the expression of the foreign carbon storage molecules are controlled in response to genes is still questionable (Leon and Fernandez... 2002). which are cells is also often dependent on environmental conditions.html 2. 2003). 2000). and metabolome (Singh et al. and isobutanol (Atsumi lipid producer. Lipid production. A possible drawback of C. 2007) and well developed transgenic secretion of cellulose. 2006. 2008. These studies can not only serve to advance examples of Chlorella transformation have been reported. glucosylglycerol. In order to redirect carbon to a fuel al. and high-throughput analytical techniques are adept at making fuel precursors and with high have been applied to the study of its transcriptome.. 2007). Multiple endosymbiotic events organisms. 2006)..org/ChlNC64A_1/ChlNC64A_1.. it will be necessary to further being developed. In addition to having a sequenced nuclear genome Transgenic approaches have enabled the production and (Merchant et al. It has not been shown how these dry weight lipid (Xu et al.. it can be grown under extreme conditions over 3 billion years of evolution. It has also been shown that induces heterotrophic growth. sucrose (Nobles and Brown.. anaerobically (important for the production of hydrogen). Koksharova et al. Diatoms are responsible for 20% the interaction between the nucleus and chloroplast in of the total global carbon fixation (Armbrust et al. physiological conditions. resulting in greater than 50% (Miyake et al. accumulation..2 Several production. reinhardtii has been recently been (sinks) in cyanobacteria. and there are fundamental differences in (Sheehan et al. Continued exploration of the evolutionary A distinguishing feature of diatoms is their silica cell walls. sucrose. and positional effects (Ferrante et in all cyanobacteria. strategies to address these issues are production pathway. it can be sexually crossed. and stable and successful expression characterize the dominant carbon storage compounds of foreign genes in C. and polyhydroxybutyrate Chloroplast transformants are also stable... pathways and regulation of fuel precursor synthesis. but may also serve to guide the development of other types of algae for biofuels production. and the conditions that trigger carbohydrate protein expression systems are well developed. it is known that glycogen accumulates under normal growth conditions in Chlorella is another well-studied genus of green algae. 2009. 2 http://genome.. and events likely had significant effects on the metabolic transgenic strains have been reported (Li et al. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is the most studied eukaryotic algae. the addition of an external carbon source Xiaoling Miao et al. reinhardtii can serve et al... Eisenhut et al. productivity under various environmental conditions. 2007).. 2004). proteome. 2008). 2007 ).. Synechocystis. These currently being determined (estimated size 130 Mb). but nevertheless.

. Meneses and Santelices. Currently. general rule but are high in carbohydrates that can be converted to various fuels. et al.3 None of the sequencing projects has thus far et al. there is nevertheless hard substrates in marine environments. there have usually been built in safeguards to prevent the release of GE organisms to avoid potential Macroalgae are historically classified as Phaeophyta disruption of ecosystems. are well established for several diatom species (Dunahay et 1999. and choice of cultivation methods In general. Since the beginning of the deployment of GE organisms. 1999. even with these (brown algae). Red macroalgae such as Porphyra spp. the brown macroalgae such as the kelps are GE algae as production strains.. each of the major macroalgal groups has in terms of organism containment. which includes diatoms. and holdfast for anchoring the entire structure to Despite the great promise of GE algae. Baldauf. or seaweeds. and expression profiling (Collen et al. Two diatom genome sequences are complete are used in seaweed population genetics (Alberto et al. Use of gene-specific probes al. Niwa et al.. because silicon metabolism is not restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and believed to be tightly coupled with the metabolism of other random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis nutrients. constructing detailed pathways evolutionarily diverse and abundant in the world’s oceans for secondary metabolite production.. 2000). Recombination of and possibly with homologous recombination. Dutcher and Kapraun. Green macroalga such as Ulva (also known as sea lettuce) are classified together with common green microalgae such as Chlamydomonas and Chlorella as Chlorophyta. 2005). 2005). This is advantageous for studying the lipid of seaweed genetics and cell function. anoxic zone formation. Chlorophyta (green algae). 2004... and Rhodophyta safeguards. 2001. and regulatory gene expression control 2005). the gene existing genes through selection and procedures such manipulation toolkit for diatoms will be fairly complete. (Armbrust et al. tools is still imperative from a research standpoint. and metabolic and coastal waters. potential for toxin markers. 2003). They are and proteomic profiling. The life cycles a great deal of uncertainty regarding the need for or of macroalgae are complex and diverse. As such.. 1997. Zaslavskaia (Jacobsen et al. 1995. They have low lipid content as a engineering of seaweed genes to create valuable products. Understanding the basic biology that will inform with the use of molecular tools and phylogenetic such aspects as lateral gene transfer. Algal Biology  . and alternation of generations. induction response.. represent a broad group of projects will facilitate efforts such as global genomic eukaryotic photosynthetic marine organisms. For Despite the uncertainty regarding the development of example.. GE algae are defined as strains life histories.. Bouza et al. also have microalgal counterparts. being applied to understand cell function in representatives With the development of robust gene silencing approaches of red. Fischer et al. 2006. of GE organisms over the past 15+ years (GAO report. 2005). combinations of sexual and asexual carrying coding sequences obtained from a foreign reproductive strategies. Ho are underway..doe. are very important. and four more 1999. there have been several unintended releases (red algae) on the basis of their predominant pigments.gov 22 2. 1996. Transgenic techniques characterization (Jin et al. 1999. such as the unicellular alga Porphyridium cruentum. they are Considerations of Genetic multicellular and possess plant-like structural features. Roeder et al. For the species displaying variations of annual and perennial purpose of this report. Apt et al.. Modifications They are typically comprised of a blade or lamina.. Niwa et al. taxonomic affinities are under re-examination 2008). species. Bowler et al. affinity with corresponding microalgal forms. For example. 2008). Genome sequencing Macroalgae.jgi.. 3 http://www... Advances in seaweed cell and molecular biology are Silicon limitation is one trigger for lipid accumulation currently being applied toward a better understanding in diatoms. 1994.. 2006) are elements have been identified (Poulsen and Kroger. However. and green seaweeds. Unlike microalgae. the status of macroalgal systematics production. the stipe. as protoplast fusion will be the basis for new strain creation where outplanting of individuals for growth Macroalgae in natural environments is a goal. Moulin et al. potential for large-scale blooms and subsequent is in a state of flux (Ali et al. and strain selection and been focused explicitly on biofuels. brown. development of genetic classified as Heterokonta within the Chromalveolata. 2003.and their requirement for silicon as a nutrient for growth. 1995. with different the appropriateness of deploying these strains.

E. (2006). Y. Bouza.. F. Multiple pathways for triacylglycerol biosynthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor.. Allen. N. Assessing patterns of geographic dispersal of gelidium sesquipedale (rhodophyta) through RAPD differentiation of populations. J. Dyer.. S. J. Seaweed Cultivation for Renewable Resources.. 2.R. rhodophyta) investigated by random amplified polymorphic dna (rapd) markers.A. 245–279. et al. et al.A. 3. 2573-2582. et al. biogenesis. Ceron Garcia. Critical reviews in biotechnology. D. D. 9(6). 47(5). 50(2). Johnston. et al. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. http://apps.C. Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Plant.Gramajo. A. 83–102. 911–917. 737-749. Traditional microalgae isolation techniques. Biolistic nuclear transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other fungi. E. Boynton. Botryococcus braunii: A renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals. (2009). (2006). 81–99. et al. 1703-1706. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. et al. 572–579. Journal of Phycology. W.J. 105(52). Klein.L. H.. C. 306(5693). R. 116(2). Banerjee. G. 1177-1180. 367-376. J.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=51&SID=2EJn46bcIj4fjd CDlNp&page=1&doc=3. 456(7219). 295–306. Genetic structure of natural populations in the red algae gelidium canaariense (gelidaiales. 240(4858).isiknowledge. MicroRNAs genomics. Science. T. Steinbuchel. Benning.B. (2001). The deep roots of eukaryotes. Arabolaza. Sanford. Castellana. H. Grossman. 1991. S.P. (2002). 27(12). K. Algal Biology  23 . The life cycle of neutral lipids: Synthesis. 37(8).. (2005).G. Boyle. Ben Ali. On the origin and functions of RNA-mediated silencing: from protists to man. R. 1534-1538. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature.. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Atsumi. Liao.. 42(2).com/full_record.C. N. 101–108. Lipid analysis of freshwater microalgae: a method study. 304-311. Casas-Mollano.L. Algal Culturing Techniques. Higashide. (2008). N. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. G. 1241-1257. (1988). storage and degradation. 925-945. Leitao.G. Bird..G. H. et al..E. 17(2). D. Bartel. (1999). 16(5). Santos. et al. Ye. A.74(9). Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. et al. J. Apt. S.. Molecular and General Genetics MGG. L. 22(3). H. I. Colombo. The Plant Cell Online. The Genome of the diatom thalassiosira pseudonana: Ecology. (1959). Stable nuclear transformation of the diatomphaeodactylum tricornutum.. 21034-21038. G. H. 63(12). Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of chlamydomonas. Cerutti. Mixotrophic production of marine microalga phaeodactylum tricornutum on various carbon sources. 381–389. Alvarez.References Adams. 689–694. (1990). Cell & Environment. (2003). Marine ecology. (2004). (2008). Discovery and revision of arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Andersen.M. (2002). Altabe.M. E. (1987)..B. A. Nature Biotechnology. (2008). Elsevier. (2005). 60(4). and function. K. Moroney. & Merino. Bligh. A. P. Cell. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.. 79-86. Armaleo. Ahlgren. mechanism. A role for lipid trafficking in chloroplast biogenesis. Kroth-Pancic. C. K. M. Baldauf.K. Bowler. and metabolism. Benson.. 2010.. Rodriguez. W. (2006). Amsterdam. (1997).V. 281–297. Cerutti. (2008). 32(9). S. R. Alberto. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. J Morgan. 300(5626). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. A mutant of chlamydomonas reinhardtii that cannot acclimate to low CO2 conditions has an insertion in the Hdh1 gene.. 51(3). Shark. Chloroplast transformation in chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles. M.V. 1355-1369. BMC Systems Biology. Ynalvez. A. Alvarez. K.L. Phylogenetic relationships among algae based on complete large-subunit rRNA sequences.. (2009). Libourel. Science. (2006). 97–103. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(3). S. Science. evolution. J. Current genetics.E. (2009). 55–66. Current genetics. C.A. 239-244. Elsevier Science Ltd. Tural. Progress in Lipid Research.C. Triacylglycerols in prokaryotic microorganisms. Shachar-Hill. Progress series(Halstenbek) (191). J. Daum. J. 252(5). Functional Plant Biology. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS. Metabolic flux analysis in plants: coping with complexity. PH. Mason. Kawachi.E. (2004). B. Armbrust. Retrived January 5. E. Athenstaedt. (1996).T. (32).

Hammock. chemically regulated gene expression system for Chlamydomonas. 92(4). 3365-3371. et al. 3857-3863.G.E. Journal of Microbiological Methods.A. The EMBO Journal. Wollman. 42. (2001). J. 15(3). Norazmi Mohamed. Journal of Microbiological Methods. (1993). Falkowski. Expression profiling of chondrus crispus (rhodophyta) after exposure to methyl jasmonate. Deng.J. rhodophyta). 6487-6492. et al. D. 331-338. Bowen.R. Annual Review of Genetics. (2005). Dutcher. 114(Pt 21). (2007). G. 13(9). K. Bailey. M.R. Journal of Phycology. Phospholipid: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase: an enzyme that catalyzes the acyl-CoA-independent formation of triacylglycerol in yeast and plants. 97(12). Fluorometric determination of the neutral lipid content of microalgal cells using nile red. C. 2803-2809. 25(3). (1971). Malaysian Journal of Science. 35(1). Journal of Bacteriology. Biotechnology Advances. Aronov. Proteome analysis of salt stress response in the cyanobacteriumsynechocystis sp.. Collen. 1321–1329. (2004). J. 26(1). Aebersold. The argininosuccinate lyase gene of chlamydomonas reinhardtii: An important tool for nuclear transformation and for correlating the genetic and molecular maps of the ARG7 locus. S. (2008). M. (1999). et al. Structure. Algal Biology  . Foyer.A.D. P. 452. M. Dahlqvist. 44(1). et al. 24 2. 51-78. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 606–625. S. nostoc muscorum.G. Y. Transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardtii with silicon carbide whiskers. Elsey. J. (2006). 21-27.G. Finazzi. J. K. Physiologia Plantarum. T. Finding gas diffusion pathways in proteins: Application to O2 and H2 transport in CpI [FeFe]-hydrogenase and the role of packing defects. 213(2). M. M. Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. et al. (2000). 6(3). European Journal of Biochemistry.E. A. Measuring the metabolome: Current analytical technologies. 3(9). B. Kunert. 6(6). strain PCC 6803. J. Dettmer. 212-217. Two different genes from schwanniomyces occidentalis determine ribosomal resistance to cycloheximide.. 31(6). L. The abundant retinal protein of the chlamydomonas eye is not the photoreceptor for phototaxis and photophobic responses. 354-360. Capecchi. Deng.B. Biodiesel from microalgae. 113–120. 333–345. (2005). 312(5771). 523528. 696-717. Photooxidative stress in plants. 294–306. An optimized. De la Jara. 12(8). Science Signaling. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) identification of genetic variation in three species of porphyra (bangiales. et al. 849–857. Journal of Cell Science. Johnson. (2006)... P. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (1993). Journal of Phycology.A. A. Fuhrmann. D. R. Purton. Cooksey. Coleman.. Journal of Applied Phycology. The Analyst.G. Fischer. Cohen. (1995). W. 463–515.. et al.. 22(2). (1992). Science. W.105(1). H.. PloS One. Flow cytometric determination of lipid content in a marine dinoflagellate.C. Purification and properties of glycogen isolated from a blue-Green Alga. P. 68(3). & Phang. L. et al. 1004–1011. Journal of Phycology. 305(5682). Chisti.Chao. et al. 639-642. Dunahay. et al. Roessler. (2007). e3200. Correlated evolution of genome size and cell volume in diatoms (bacillariophyceae). Chu. et al. S. Dunn. B. et al. (2008). 433–438. Eisenhut. 267-273.E. Rochaix. Fluorescent measurement of microalgal neutral lipids. The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. 130(5). (1989). H. (1994). et al. E. Prometrics. et al. C. Genetic transformation of the diatoms cyclotella cryptica and Navicula saprophila. 8(10). Lelandais. 2109-2120. T. Plant Physiology. 15(5). Metabolome phenotyping of inorganic carbon limitation in cells of the wild type and photorespiratory mutants of the cyanobacterium synechocystis sp strain PCC 6803. (2006). Biotechniques. Targeting and covalent modification of cell wall and membrane proteins heterologously expressed in the diatom cylindrotheca fusiformis (Bacillariophyceae). Mass spectrometry reviews. (1999). F. Journal of Experimental Botany. J. K. (1994).H. R. 148(4). 171.D. Domon. (2008). Kapraun. 124–131. 2733-2745. P. 6(9). Debuchy. S. Ferrante. 65(2). Molecular and Cellular Biology. Fulda. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. N. crypthecodinium cohnii. Jarvis. (2003). (2007). Dunahay. Journal of Applied Phycology. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.. Del Pozo. C. (1987). Fatty Acid Composition of Some Malaysian Seaweeds.J. Eberhard. (2008).. (2003).D. Connolly. The dynamics of photosynthesis.

J. 6-53. 75(6). K. Journal of Phycology. 888-896. DNA Research. Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in gossypium. The nitrate reductase gene-switch: A system for regulated expression in transformed cells of dunaliella salina. K. achievements and problems. Membrane lipids in algae. S. 9(6). R. (1991). siliquosum (Phaeophyta) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers. et al. 2589-2601. 313-349. Horn. J. Ho. 253–264. Richards.. Gibbs. 489-493. (2008). Hu.B. Journal of Applied Phycology.L. Østgaard. Hallmann. 1721-1725. (2006). strain PCC 7942. Expert Review of Proteomics.H. Hansel. 54(4). (1995). M. 621–639. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 17.C. et al. (2000). E. S.L. 249-254. 296(5567). (2003). 2(2). Weis. Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. 212-218. 53–64. Stable nuclear transformation of chlamydomonas using the chlamydomonas gene for nitrate reductase. U. N. A. A.L. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology... Genome Research. Jacobsen. 99–110. C.E. 616. (2007). Q.. A. et al. Rasmussen. Influence of codon bias on the expression of foreign genes in microalgae. (2007). R. (1985). et al. Fermentative metabolism of chlamydomonas reinhardtii: I.M. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. Annual Review Plant Biology. T. Stern. (2000). Hasnain. S. II. (2006). (2007). K.. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 71-91.. (1991). Journal of Cell Biology. Harwood. J.J. Kaneko. Cyanobacterial cell walls: News from an unusual prokaryotic envelope. Algal transgenics and biotechnology. 51-57. (2007). 43(1). Kindle. Hallmann. Gross. 795–805. Han.A. 25(5). M. 1191- 1199. et al.. (1989). Manavathu. 3647-3650. (1996). 39(5). 2009. Jin. 3(3). Hoiczyk. Oil bodies and oleosins in seeds. 109-136.. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Ghirardi. S.W.). strain PCC6803. R.doi.. Pang. A. (1992). X. K. Circadian changes in relative abundance of two photosynthetic transcripts in the maring macroalga kappaphycus alvarezii (rhodophyta). Molecular characterisation of sargassum polycystum and S. PA and Murata. 109(6). Gelling agents for tissue culture of the seaweed hizikia fusiformis.J. Goulard.L. Koksharova. D. Gfeller. 2. 5(12). 1(1). Aasen. Krause. (1998). Plant Journal. Heitzer. (1997). (2005).M. Engineering the chloroplast genome: Techniques and capabilities for chloroplast transformation in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. et al. Aasen. G. http://dx. Kindle. Starch and fatty acid synthesis in plastids from developing embryos of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. et al. In transgenic microalgae as green cell factories. Rappel. S.org/10. Nuclear transformation of eukaryotic microalgae: historical overview. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions. Microbiology. E. The Journal of Bacteriology.C. 81-98. Science. 403(1- 2). 1252-1261. The first protein map of synechococcus sp. Gene. T. 177-200.1007/978-0-387-75532-8_5. 16(10). 664-672. 182(5). Huang. & Fernández. Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. E. G. Genetic engineering of the multicellular green alga volvox: A modified and multiplied bacterial antibiotic resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker. Algal Biology  25 . O. M. 503-507. analysis of fermentative products from starch in dark and light. Plant journal. Horn.L. function and genetics (Siegenthaler. (2000). Ethanol production from seaweed extract. Klint. K.S. Dordrecht. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. Plant Physiol. 1-11.. 7(1). Lipids in photosynthesis: Structure. S. K. 42(1). (2002).H. (1999).P..K. (1984). Transgenic Plant Journal. I. Molecular and Cellular Biology. Production of ethanol from mannitol by zymobacter palmae. et al. I. Østgaard. The Plant Journal. 6(6). E. Li. F. (1994). Rawsthorne. Shotgun lipidomics: Multidimensional MS analysis of cellular lipidomes. Leung. W. A. Phang. Lüning. Hawkins. (2007). 24(1)..Gaietta.. 132-142. eds). J. Hydrogenases and hydrogen photoproduction in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms*. León. 33-41. 75(1). Kang. DNA-mediated transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardi cells: Use of aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase as a selectable marker. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. Retrieved December 30. 58. H. 88(5). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Applied Phycology. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. et al. F.

1181–1189.11(3). (1993).. Q. C. & Zhao. Journal of Applied Phycology. Development. Ohlrogge. 245- 250. Weselake. 691–701.R. 26 2. Sonnewald. Kikuchi. X.. 649-658. S. Structure.S. Nobles. 15(5). Niyogi. 50(1).. Lindon. Wang. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 59. (2009). S.J. The complex network of non-cellulosic carbohydrate metabolism.L. Y. (2008). Journal of Applied Phycology. Brown.K. (1999). J. R.. A. rhodophyta).. 296-302. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. (2003). H. N. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Progress in lipid research.. Matsunaga. Kobiyama. Polyhydroxybutyrate production from carbon dioxide by cyanobacteria. Bock. 633-662. Niwa. D. 29(11). 957-970. Molecular and Cellular Biology. (2001). (2003). 7(7). J. Science. (2006). 513-524. B. 10(3). Aruga. A. Y. J.G. N. Nelson.L Kirk. Journal of Phycology. plants and microorganisms.K. Algal Biology  . Metabolic flux analysis in plants: From intelligent design to rational engineering.. 34(17). A.. Mathews. J. (1995). X. Lytovchenko.. function and biogenesis of storage lipid bodies and oleosins in plants. 241-246. Structure and function of photosystems I and II. Nelson. Humphries. 218(1). Confirmation of cultivated porphyra tenera (bangiales. 325–438. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.. Meneses. Murphy. Plant Physiology. 625-650. Melis. Santelices.Libourel. S. T. Fernie. (1999). Niwa. et al. Browse. Murphy..C. (1999).. (2005). (1999). 57(6). (1994). Journal of Applied Phycology. Morphological and molecular analysis of the endangered species porphyra tenera (bangiales. ‘Metabonomics’: Understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. FEMS Microbiology Letters. Progress in Lipid Research. (2007). B. (1995).P. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase: A key mediator of plant triacylglycerol synthesis. 227–235. Miao. Metabolic pathway engineering for enhanced biohydrogen production. Cellulose. (1999). D. Karcher. 4011-4019. encodes a chaperone-like protein. McDermid. Phycological Research. (2000). M. P. et al. rhodophyta). rhodophyta) by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses of the plastid and nuclear DNA. The Plant Cell. et al. Lipid biosynthesis. Falkowski. Strain selection and genetic variation in gracilaria chilensis (gracilariales. P. (1994). (2007). 53(4). et al. (2008). Annual Review of Plant Biology.M. 127-135. Nicholson. P. Lung. Merchant. a volvox gene required for asymmetric division and germ cell specification. Y. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. Shachar-Hill. K. K.. 7(1). Sucrose accumulation in salt-stressed cells of agp gene deletion-mutant in cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp PCC 6803. Genetic engineering in marine cyanobacteria. 122(1). G. Savereide.B. 218(1). 40(5). Isolation and characterization of six cDNAs involved in carbon matabloism in laminaria digitata (phaeophyceae). D. Xenobiotica. 41(12). 7404-7416. (2003).G. Annual Review of Plant Biology. (2005). Neupert.. 15(6). 318(5848). A. Journal of Phycology. U. S. 521-565.J. Sustained photobiological hydrogen gas production upon reversible inactivation of oxygen evolution in the green alga chlamydomonas reinhardtii.. Transgenic expression of gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53582 cellulose synthase genes in the cyanobacterium synechococcus leopoliensis strain UTCC 100. 71-77. 57. Current opinion in plant biology. J. J. I. P. The CRY1 gene in chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Structure and use as a dominant selectable marker for nuclear transformation.. 84- 86(1). Long. Photoprotection revisited: Genetic and molecular approaches. R.. 294-304. The biogenesis and functions of lipid bodies in animals.M. Wu. K. et al. Wu. glsA. Lipids. Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds. (2006). 247- 280. & Stuercke. Miao.. 1073-1088. 45(1). J. D.A. E. (2009). J. 35. R. Aruga. Miyake. G. 77-84. N.A. Lefebvre. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. 991-1002.. 71-77. 126(4). 1237-1245. Miller. 14(6). Holmes. Generation of chlamydomonas strains that efficiently express nuclear transgenes. 32(3). S. D. Takeyama.R. K. I. 1140-1150.J. Yocum. 333-359. (2000). Moulin. Sucrose accumulation in salt-stressed cells of agp gene deletion-mutant in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp PCC 6803. 41(2).

(2003). (1998). Round. 1239-1248. 4(2). Molecular genetic manipulation of the diatom thalassiosira pseudonana (bacillariophyceae). Plant Physiology. O. M. Poulton. Plant Physiology.. et al. Journal of Phycology. Sieracki.. 103-116. Protoplasma. 39(6). Induced beta-carotene synthesis driven by triacylglycerol deposition in the unicellular alga dunaliella bardawil. (1998). P. et al. (2005). Storz. (1984). Automated isolation techniques for microalgae. Polle. Annotation of genes involved in glycerolipid biosynthesis in chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Discovery of the betaine lipid synthase BTA1Cr. (2004). 24. Raven. Ohlrogge. (1997). Academic Press. Stal. ASM Press. The Plant Cell Online.E. Shimogawara. 309–317. F. 1324-1335. Misumi. K. A. Kroger. (7). Shachar-Hill. R. Worth Publishers. Y. T. 19-31. et al. G. et al. (2004).. (1998). 1821-1828. New York. et al. J. Evert. 148(4). A new molecular tool for transgenic diatoms. Crosbie. (1998). (2002). Cambridge University Press. Serebryakova. 242-52. (2008). Sheehan. W. et al. (1992). Stal. B. (1987).H. Watanabe. J. 236(1). et al. Biology of Plants 5th ed. 1227-1235. 272.. FEMS Microbiology Reviews.D. Y.C. Reiss. 122(4). 179–211. Chesley.M.. P. Stahl. DC. A. Fujiwara.. Integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism with energy production is crucial to light acclimation in the cyanobacterium synechocystis. 199-217. a DNA insertional transformant of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with a truncated light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size. 1257–1264. 49–59. RecA protein stimulates homologous recombination in plants. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae.E. T. S. 31(1). Schwender.B. K.A. Rabbani. W. Poulsen. Bioenergy. Krumbein. 3094-3098. The Plant Journal. S. & Kuroiwa. L. 14(6). 273-291. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. Journal of Phycology. 3413–3423. S. H. Journal of Phycology. Tanaka. Transient gene suppression in a red alga. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.. C. Regoes. Sheremetieva. S. S. N. J. 467-478. The Ecology of Algae.R. Seibert. 41(6). Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D. Eichhorn.E. Roeder..J. tla1. 2. A.. H. Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during arabidopsis seed filling. A.S. 1059–1065. N. et al. Understanding flux in plant metabolic networks. Archives of Microbiology. SNAP-tag™ mediated live cell labeling as an alternative to GFP in anaerobic organisms. 7(3). High-efficiency transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardtii by electroporation. Plant Physiology. et al. (2005).E. 116(4).. Photosynthetic water-splitting for hydrogen production. The plastidic phosphoglucomutase from Arabidopsis. Prince. non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Oscillatoria sp.J. An abundance of RNA regulators*. FEMS Microbiology Letters.E.. (1996). 148(1). Tsygankov. 42(5). Planta. 40(4). B. S. Kheshgi. Kröger. 135(3). J. 166(1).F. Algal culture techniques.A.M. M. Melis. Effects of silicon deficiency on lipid composition and metabolism in the diatom cyclotella cryptica.. 611–621. et al. M. U. Biotechniques. 394–400. (2004). et al. (2002). (2009). 809. K.. 89–94. P.S. N. 76–80. Temporal separation of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in the filamentous. Plant Physiology.. 21(2). 149(1). 217(1). M.. Tandem inverted repeat system for selection of effective transgenic RNAi strains in Chlamydomonas. Benning. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 107-112. A Look Back at the U. Riekhof. (2005). 93(7). et al. V. Reversible hydrogenase activity of gloeocapsa alpicola in continuous culture. (2008).Ohnuma. J.T. Moezelaar. Hehl. C. Current opinion in plant biology. Wassarman. 1193-1199. N.G. J. Washington. Algal Biology  27 . A. The FEBS Journal. N. Genetics. (2005). Identification of stress gene transcripts in laminaria digitata (phaeophyceae) protoplast cultures by expressed sequence tag analysis. (2005). (2005). Singh.B. Periappuram. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. R. Eukaryotic Cell.. Fermentation in cyanobacteria.J. Polle. L. Ruuska.E. (2000). Truncated chlorophyll antenna size of the photosystems—a practical method to improve microalgal productivity and hydrogen production in mass culture. Poulsen. (2006). 27(11-12). (2004). 1191-1206. Roessler. Sears.R. N. (1988). Rohr. L. A reversible enzyme reaction with an important role in metabolic control.. Cloning and functional characterization of a phospholipid: Diacylglycerol acyltransferase from arabidopsis. The photobiological production of hydrogen: Potential efficiency and effectiveness as a renewable fuel. Altuvia.. (74).. Kanakagiri.

Zaslavskaia. Plant Physiology. Toepel. Lipid production by dunaliella salina in batch culture effects of nitrogen limitation and light intensity. A. Miao. 145. S. S. Gaucher. (1998). X. Metabolic engineering in the -omics era: Elucidating and modulating regulatory networks. & Lane. Embryo-specific reduction of ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase leads to an inhibition of starch synthesis and a delay in oil accumulation in developing seeds of oilseed rape. et al. 66(1). (2008). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 153–159. T.N. Metabolic Engineering. (2009). 2676-2686. Q. Journal of Bacteriology. Effects of growth condition on the structure of glycogen produced in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp. D. 3904-3913. (2007). Zhu. F. (2007). Zendejas.A. S. (2005). S. PCC6803. Fernie. Metabolic flux analysis in synechocystis using isotope distribution from C-13-labeled glucose. 379–407. I. A. et al.S. 379–386. Transformation of the diatom phaeodactylum tricornutum (bacillariophyceae) with a variety of selectable marker and reporter genes. (2008). (2002). 2195-2203. Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. 9(4). Fermentation metabolism of the unicellular cyanobacterium Cyanothece PCC 7822. (2008). X. et al. D. Zhekisheva. B. Plant Physiology..A. Yoo.H. 69(2). Vigeolas. 325–331. Vermaas. (2007)...A. (2005). Van der Oost.R. Spalding. Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate. Eukaryotic Cell. 115-122. 197-216. Journal of Phycology. (2002). 202-216. Zhao. et al. A complex system of small RNAs in the unicellular green alga chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. J. C. T. 190(11). Wilhelm. 337(21-23). Q. P. A numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. A. M. A role for lipid droplets in inter-membrane lipid traffic. P. 36(2). Lane. J. J.S. Methods in enzymology. et al. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.F. 1264-1277. 32(5).. Hydrogenases and hydrogen metabolism of cyanobacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. Journal of Phycology. 152(5).. 28 2. E. 297. S. Yoo. Turner. Nuclear-gene targeting by using single-stranded DNA avoids illegitimate DNA integration in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Prometrics. Vemuri.G. (2006). et al. (1989). 515-524..P. (2000).. Zhu. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Current Opinion in Biotechnology. G. et al.. (2006). Yang. 415-419. (2004). H. 1190-1203. Carbohydrate Research. 669-681. (2002). 40(5).. 38(2). et al. Characterization of cyanobacterial glycogen isolated from the wild type and from a mutant lacking of branching enzyme. Shimizu.G. Regulation of metabolic networks: Understanding metabolic complexity in the systems biology era. W. Tamagnini. et al. The regulation of carbon and nutrient assimilation in diatoms is significantly different from green algae. Department of Energy Journal of Undergraduate Research. Yu. 498-504. Journal of Applied Phycology. Aristidou. New Phytologist. Ort.J. M.R. C. Tanner. Wu. Simmons. U. Weldy. 231-239. Zehmer. 21(10). X. L. Algal Biology  .Sweetlove. J. Differential transcriptional analysis of the cyanobacterium cyanothece sp. Xu. 4(3). (2005). Journal of Biotechnology. 4(7). 1-20.. S.. M. Genome Research. deSturler. Gene modifications and mutation mapping to study the function of photosystem II.P. Huesemann. et al. 20(5). H. (2007). 9-24. W. Jane. Protist. Zorin. Hua. International Journal of Energy Research. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. 293-310. 914-921. L. Hegemann.. Genes & development. Sizova. J. (2009). P. et al. Archives of Microbiology. 168(1).. Long. C. Genes and development. B. 513-526. E. 157(2). M. T. (2002). Renewable hydrogen production. et al. (2007). Triacylglycerol accumulation and profiling in the model diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Baccilariophyceae) during starvation. 91–124. 21(6). 136(1). Accumulation of oleic acid in haematococcus pluvialis (chlorophyceae) under nitrogen starvation or high light is correlated with that of astaxanthin esters. 499-507. Long. strain ATCC 51142 during light-dark and continuous-light growth. 19(2). K. 17(2). J. (126). et al. (2006). Valencia-Sanchez.

are unlikely to be sterilizable and may require periodic cleaning due to biofilm formation. it is premature to predict whether problems of scalability. capital costs maximizing light exposure. open ponds) or hybrid systems will prevail in the lose much less water than open ponds due to evaporation. open gas exchange (both CO2 and O2). (TE) analysis that can evaluate the cultivation system Open ponds. Algal Cultivation  29 . Algal Cultivation than for open ponds raceways. especially in terms of mixing and algal cultivation in closed (e. however. Photobioreactors can also provide a various features of both approaches). Many of these issues are being for closed photobioreactor construction are currently higher addressed through improved material usage and enhanced Exhibit 3. it is important to 3. photobioreactors). Both types of cultivation systems must contend with require light to grow and create new biomass. both varying in where contamination and “foreign” algae are more their challenges and advantages (Exhibit 3. It is. However. therefore. important that cultivation R&D they do not receive the benefit of evaporative cooling projects are closely associated with techno-economic and so temperature must be carefully maintained. Though photobioreactors (e. but long-term culture Broadly speaking. are subject to daily and seasonal in the context of upstream and downstream processing changes in temperature and humidity.1 Comparative features of microalgal cultivation approaches ADVANTAGES CHALLENGES • Less loss of water than open ponds • Scalability problems • Superior long-term culture • Require temperature maintenance as they Closed maintenance do not have evaporative cooling Photobioreactors • Higher surface to volume ratio can • May require periodic cleaning due to support higher volumetric cell biofilm formation Photoautotrophic densities • Need maximum light exposure Cultivation • Subject to daily and seasonal changes in • Evaporative cooling maintains temperature and humidity Open Ponds temperature • Inherently difficult to maintain • Lower capital costs monocultures • Need maximum light exposure • Easier to maintain optimal conditions for production and contamination prevention • Cost and availability of suitable Heterotrophic feedstocks such as lignocellulosic sugars • Opportunity to utilize inexpensive Cultivation • Competes for feedstocks with other lignocellulosic sugars for growth biofuel technologies • Achieves high biomass concentrations 3. higher surface to volume ratio and so can support higher volumetric cell densities.g.3. Photobioreactors to identify the best-suited cultivation system. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Given the multiple pathways to cultivating microalgae Traditionally.1 compares the readily introduced. reducing the amount of water that Photoautotrophic Cultivation must be processed and thus the cost of harvest (Christi. algae can be cultivated via maintenance is likely to be superior to that in open ponds photoautotrophic or heterotrophic methods. photobioreactors have suffered from and cyanobacteria. industry.1 Cultivation Pathways acknowledge the advantages and disadvantages of both photoautotrophic cultivation approaches.. For photoautotrophic cultivation strategies where algae 2007)..g.

. This approach takes advantage of mature on growth structures in deep waters off the coast of industrial fermentation technology. Hypnea. Because these systems rely on primary productivity the United States and Europe. considerable scale-up from current activities. over those in water have been listed as 1) ease of plant management. Demonstrations of successful callus formation and improvements in efficiency of water movements and plantlet regeneration have been reported in commercially pond construction costs are needed (Friedlander... The operation of large offshore In heterotrophic cultivation.. 1993) and the phycocolloid-producing seaweeds pond and photobioreactor systems have been published or Gracilaria. and presented (see Chapter 10). then reared to plantlet size and transplanted (Bruton et al. photoautotrophic and heterotrophic ability of algae. it remains to be seen which system protoplasts is possible in both the laboratory (Dipakkore will be preferred at scale over long periods of operation. Sargassum. Growth of plantlets regenerated from data. or Heterotrophic Cultivation in open pond facilities. 2006). 2002). been adopted by seaweed biologists (Garcia-Reina et al. and culturalists to advance the vegetative propagation disease. they could compete for feedstocks and popular resistance against use of coastal regions for with other biofuel technologies.. Advantages of the land-based systems to coastal farms for grow-out to harvestable size. Algal Cultivation  .. Land-based pond systems have also been considered for macroalgal cultivation (Friedlander.. 2) use of plants with or without holdfast Modern tools developed in the larger plant breeding structures.. Though TE analyses for both open Tokuda. important seaweeds such as Undaria (Kawashima and 30 3. appears especially open raceways. Macroalgae 1987). difficulties were challenges compared with photoautotrophic methods. 1993. in particular. In the latter. Hanisak. availability of suitable feedstocks such as lignocellulosic which have viable seaweed aquaculture industries. Reddy et al. Turbinaria. located in close proximity to conversion operations Although the field is still at an early stage of development. Buck. Laminaria hyperborean. Dipakkore et al. While it was determined that such cultivation presents a different set of advantages and structures would support growth of kelp. 2004. 2008.. in hybrid systems.engineering designs. and predation. thus providing optimism for future the infrastructure required to grow the algae (Xu. have been algal growth. Kumar et al. 2007). 2005. to generate Biomass Program through several deployments of kelp new biomass. modern prototypes for offshore potential to utilize inexpensive lignocellulosic sugars for growth of the kelp. photobioreactors could (Dai et al. which harnesses both the overcome due to the conflicting uses of coastal zones. Heterotrophic cultivation also achieves high successfully tested in the North Sea (Buck and Buchholz. 1995) or a series of al. 2008).. community are now available to seaweed biologists 4) avoidance of open sea problems such as bad weather. near-shore. Saccharina latissima and Nereocystis luetkeana have in greenhouses are attached to substrates (usually rope been successfully co-cultured with salmonid fish species structures). In sugars. and there is the the structures. biomass concentrations that reduces the extent and cost of 2004. 2004. Macroalgae can be cultivated in off-shore. and 5) possibility of farm operations of seaweeds through cell and tissue culture techniques. efforts. and major technological 1991). 2004. environmental regulations from other sources. et al. seeds grown spp. Typically. 2004. Dai et al. As a result. (Chynoweth. 2005). using artificially upwelled water produce a variety of products at large scale. such as sugars. Dai et al. 2007). already widely used to Southern California. A related approach aquaculture represent challenges that will need to be is mixotrophic cultivation. 2009). 2006) and field Additionally. 3) ease of nutrient application without dilution. much of the information used Gelidiella (Collantes et al. Modern integrated aquaculture scenario in co-culture with finfish macroalgal cultivation technology that is based on the use and mollusks.et al. However. and Chile. providing high cell density algal inocula promising for growing plants from protoplasts (Dai et for production ponds (Ben-Amotz. 1993). Japan. Porphyra been in practice since the 1950s. 2005). encountered with the stability of either the structures Optimal conditions for production and contamination themselves or the stability of the attachment of kelp to prevention are often easier to maintain. wastes from the other species of artificially produced seed as a source of propagules has represent a nutrient supply for the macroalgae. linked turbidostats or chemostats (Benson et al. Heterotrophic as a nutrient source..et al. both as free-standing algal farms and in an Macroalgae require unique cultivation strategies. Recent studies have play a critical role as breeder/feeder systems linked to shown that Porphyra... For contribution to a biofuels the micropropagation of plants is a concept that has marketplace. algae are grown without light seaweed farms was initially tested by the Marine and are fed a carbon source. Near-shore coastal environments are already The primary challenges with this approach are the cost and being exploited by countries like China. for these analyses is based on assumptions or proprietary Kumar et al. improvement in strain selection..

. Wilson et al.. commercial-scale algal cultivation: selective.. (2009) point out that though there may be between 40. 2008. and the use of algal mat or biofilm cultivation must be developed on scales that are orders of magnitude schemes.. proteins. “Environmental” DNA sequence analysis can contribute to the development of PCR-based • Standardized metrics for system-level (Zhu et al. an investment in “open source” test bed facilities for public sector Important questions concerning this threat RD&D may foster more cultivation research. e. Brussaard. Because of the and even less is known about host resistance mechanisms. The methods must be sensitive.2 Scale-Up Challenges species. chemical compounds. especially in open larger than all current worldwide algal culturing facilities systems. or flow-cytometry-based taxonomic assays. but very little is known about host specificity and economic barriers to success. Tapping into existing agricultural or reservoirs of algal pathogens and predators? municipal waste streams will lower nutrient costs but could • To what extent will local “weedy” algae invade introduce unacceptable pathogens. there have only been 150 formal descriptions of phycoviruses. 2008. must also be managed in a way that balances is the fact that algal predators and pathogens are both productivity and pathogen sensitivity with the plasticity of pervasive and little understood (Becker. 2006. pervasiveness of issues related to scale. TSA- • Nutrient source scaling. Viprey et al.. 2004). although current has yet to consider the intricacies of biological carbon understanding of their diversity and host range is very concentration mechanisms (Wang and Spalding. Honda et algal physiological adaptation. Methods for rapid. Some members of the a mixed or natural assemblage of organisms in an attempt community will be of positive value. Continuous monitoring will management. 2005..g.. 2006 ). such as those that to maximize total harvested biomass. Boutte et al.. including worrisome components of large-scale algae cultivation CO2. 2008). It should be noted that. 2009).000 and several million phytoplankton 3. • What prevention or treatment measures Wilson et al. and pathogens.. automated or semi-automated biological and chemical monitoring in production settings will Four broad cultivation challenges have emerged be essential for assessing the health and compositional that are important to address for economically dynamics of algal cultures. monocultures are inherently difficult to maintain combined. Algal Cultivation  31 . and be necessary in open systems since seasonal variation in • Water conservation. 2008.. viable.Other options for algal cultivation are being investigated Stability of Large-Scale Cultures including the harvesting of naturally occurring marine algal Systems for large-scale production of biofuels from algae blooms. limited. for real-time monitoring.. 3. 2005). Others will compete for shared resources. and lipids still others will cause culture disruption. it may become necessary to understand and manage the One possible approach to contend with this is to cultivate communities that will be present. predators. 2008) productivity analysis. Fungal of supplemental CO2 in large-scale algal cultivation and viral pathogens are common. and recycling. 2009). Wilson et al. little is known about might limit such takeovers? artificial pond ecology or pathology. and management of competitors. The cost-benefit analysis al. In certain cultivation systems. to large-scale algal cultures include: Nutrient sources and water treatment/recycling are • Are agricultural or municipal waste streams—a technically trivial and inexpensive at small scales and potentially significant source of nutrients for algal yet represent major technical and economic problems at cultivation—actually a liability because of significant commercial scales. as well as potentially provide • Culture stability.. and investigation into these areas will be important for the development of large- scale cultivation risk mitigation and remediation strategies. Additionally. management. sustainability and FISH (Marie et al. competitors. or and take over bioreactors and open ponds? heavy metals into the biomass stream (Hoffman et al. 1994. and inexpensive. Cheng et al. Nutrients. predators.. Rittmann et al. One of the more into a variety of useful products.. it will be and require significant investment in methods for detection challenging to maintain algal monocultures on this scale. and pathogens is expected (Hoffman et al. Chytrid fungi have also been known to cause The inherent difficulties of scaling up from laboratory the collapse of industrial algal cultivation ponds (Hoffman to commercial operations present both technical et al. and simple and complex carbohydrates. This model would can scavenge and recycle nutrients or synthesize essential require a downstream biorefinery capable of processing vitamins. 2004. 1999.

(Ketchum and Redfield. competitive Magnetic Resonance-based methods for rapid lipid content production strains.. civil and mechanical engineers is needed for cultivation science and engineering will yield significant rapid progress. Thus. inexpensive chemical treatments or physiological adaptations and high-throughput monitoring. supplemental CO2 has Nitrogen. models and establish protocols for measurement of yields. light stress in some marine phytoplankton may also The primary focus is the major nutrients – nitrogen. nitrogen nutrition has long been known to affect lipid accumulation in phytoplankton Nutrient Sources. Phosphorous appears to be an (Rosenberg et al.. Fluorescent and Nuclear also inform efforts at developing robust. result in increases in lipid content (Azachi et al. must also be R&D in both areas. molecule with higher lipophilicity or lower quantum yields whose competitiveness in the field cannot be accurately in aqueous solvent may prove to be more reliable indicators predicted. Requirements for additional nutrients. From a productivity standpoint. a significant investment toward basic of algal lipid contents (Gocze and Freeman. coordinated research amongst analytical System Productivity chemists. developing an understanding of pond transportation and the volatile market for carbon credits will speciation. and production siting. 2008. 1994). For example. and products. Utilization of existing and in the development of an algal biofuel industry could new knowledge related to the physiological regulation of facilitate the deployment of algal based-biofuels by lipid or carbohydrate accumulation coupled with scalable ensuring consistent. etc. permeable. and normalization. Along with standards. 1938. predators. The synthesis of new non- genetic modifications of production strains may become toxic. New approaches are split Oswald. but vary depending upon the specific strain and algal cultivation may rarely coincide with high-volume water source chosen. automated. The use and availability of carbon- point sources of CO2 (see Chapter 9). vitamins. Spalding 2008). 1996).. 1999). and pathogens will be a key to the success of remedial actions and for determining Better methods to detect the amount of desired fuel when decontamination and subsequent restart procedures precursor produced will be required to assess the represent the only alternative. For example. 1987. The cost of CO2 based nutrients for heterotrophic growth will also affect the economics and sustainability of such systems. biochemists. 1996. fluorescent indicators other than Nile Red necessary. cultivation schemes should lead to enhancements in productivity.. Nutrient supplies for algal cultivation have a sizeable 1998). iron. 1999. and Management 1981. Reed et al. need to be more rigorously culture prior to water recycle. densities. Gao et al. The development of studied. 32 3. The frequency of contamination screening in algae have been developed and applied to events that require decontamination/restarts will be an many different types of phytoplankton with mixed results important parameter in the cost of production because of (Cooksey et al.Furthermore. Eltgroth et al. 2009) and a focus especially important issue as there have been calculations on better understanding the mechanisms of biological that the world’s supply of phosphate is in danger of running CO2 concentration from ambient air (Lapointe et al. Dynamic pond monitoring will be important are also important. Shifrin and Chisholm Sustainability. More recent data suggest that high salt and high impact on cost. and ecology be a major challenge for TE feasibility studies. Strain selection should take nutrient requirements into account. Benemann and Oswald. This information will productivity of potential strains.. 2008. sustainable fuels. fit-for-purpose fuels. and genetic. as well as others such potential need to either discard or treat the contaminated as Near Infra Red spectroscopy. sustainability. Research at the interface between basic algal biology and chemical.. trace metals. and silicon (in the case of diatoms). predator-prey relationships. diverging dynamics will be important. rates. 2002). Early detection schemes for business models are already apparent on these issues. and because of the 2005. This calculation takes into account a 50% between using algae to scrub CO2 from emission gasses rate of nutrient recycle. as siting requirements for efficient considered. molecular-level algal ecology will be an important component of the investment There is an immediate need to standardize productivity portfolio required for developing the potential of algae. Sheehan et al. and adapted for rapid. Douskova et al.. derivatives of the Bodipy for both wild-type and genetically modified algae. These tools. and significant operating cost. metabolites.S. invasive species. National and international efforts toward improvements in productivity while at the same time generating quality assurance policy standards early on lower the cost of production.. physiologists. productivity lost during down time. and iron additions represent a long been known to increase algal growth rate. dollars (Benemann and renewable. phosphorous. research in multi-trophic. accounting for 6-8 cents per this area is receiving new attention from the search for gallon of algal fuel in 1987 U. out (Abelson. 2008).. Algal Cultivation  . phosphorous. There is justification to carry out such as sulfur.

. Reagent grade sources of nutrients could make the price Conservation. biogas.000 gallons to fill. The final fuel product from algal oil biology. means to induce oil accumulation in the cells (Sheehan Important research areas therefore include: et al. too much of a particular nutrient may prove toxic. Limitation of a key nutrient will have serious impacts on biomass Nutrient sourcing and the control of nutrient productivity. cyanobacteria as a way to provide nitrogen biologically. Algal Cultivation  33 . to be more valuable than using the spent biomass for It is possible to consider the use of nitrogen-fixing products such as animal feed. nitrate. and sustainability implications of various discharge. brackish. and potential nitrogen and phosphorous. for example. Douskova et al. or silicon) as a economics. Further research into the availability day (Weissman and Tillet. Finding inexpensive sources of nutrients will be important. costs are tied end up primarily in the spent algal biomass. For example. e.5 cm per over long distances. phosphorous. 2005. From a to fossil fuel prices. such as saline water from waste streams is a very attractive alternative.g. but it may also be desirable to use nutrient levels are vitally important factors for cultivation limitation (e. buildup. phosphorous. If this blowdown water contains substantial compatibility with cultivation sites..Nitrogen is typically supplied in one of three forms: ammonia. a certain amount • Geographic Information System (GIS) analyses of of “blowdown” water must be removed to prevent salt wastewater resources to understand availability.” either because of and phosphorous into biomass for water clean-up. Agricultural- or commodity-grade nutrients are more applicable. Although economics dictate that the bulk of nutrient sources and recycling scenarios water derived from the harvesting step must be returned • Studies to explore the mechanisms of nutrient to the cultivation system (where remaining nutrients recycling. aquifers and seawater. also become necessary to expand the limits of analysis to include recycling of nutrients from animal waste. In the future. however. 1996). or urea. Currently. real economic or sustainability problems or because of Utilizing agricultural run-off also poses economic benefits loss of public support due to perceived problems. tend to be near enormous. then most of the nutrients will remain in the such a scheme will certainly have some impact on overall digestor sludge and can be returned to the growth system productivity levels as photosynthetic energy could (Benemann and Oswald. which is a loss of 13. The processes through be diverted from carbon fixation to nitrogen fixation. gallons per day from the 1 ha pond. unused nutrients in • TE and life cycle analysis to understand the cost. productivity. Careful control of nutrient levels is also critical. but One of the main advantages of using algae for their costs are still significant. evaporative losses can exceed 0. by preventing eutrophication. 1998). 2009). Therefore. Because synthetic nitrogen fixation processes contains no nitrogen. and Recycling of a gallon of algal fuel cost-prohibitive. Though the water used to initially fill the pond can be saline. agricultural. or iron. disposal will become a problem impact of such sources on algal biofuels production due to concerns of eutrophication of surface waters. a hypothetical 1 hectare (ha).. water breakdown of organic materials and to sequester nitrogen can easily become a “show-stopper. At the same time.g. which these nutrients are re-mobilized and made available which may or may not be compensated for by the “free” for algal growth are not well understood.. from anaerobic digestion sludges can feed subsequent algal growth). 20 metropolitan areas with high land prices and limited land cm deep open pond will require 530. nitrogen. However. nutrient recycle may prove inputs should be accounted for in life cycle analyses. A potential problem with this approach however is the impact on facility siting. availability. which is provide some of the nitrogen and sulfur needed from a component of the diatom cell walls. algae are used in some wastewater treatment facilities water management poses some of the largest issues because of their ability to provide oxygen for the bacterial for algal biofuels. produced 3. utilizing the biofuels production is their ability to thrive in water nutrient content of municipal.000 and compatibility of wastewater resources is warranted. or industrial unsuitable for land crops. water demands will be Wastewater treatment facilities. If not addressed adequately. and the very large required energy sustainability perspective. If the biomass residues are. the culture medium pose a problem for waste water energy. Water Management. and it is not practical to transport wastewater In desert areas. these nutrients utilize fossil fuels (particularly natural gas). for example. it may NOx and SOx (Doucha. and sustainability issues. Also. 1989). This may be nitrogen. With large cultivation systems. treated by anaerobic digestion to produce perhaps in co-culture with eukaryotic algae. The ideal form of nitrogen Another approach to reduce nutrient costs is to pursue is a function of relative costs and the specific strain’s a diligent recycle. On the other hand. Note also that flue gas fed to algal cultures may particularly problematic for recycling of silicon.

However. etc. research in the following areas is warranted: in the culture and the salinity of the replacement water. toxins (including heavy cooling. accumulated salts. flocculants. Treatment may be essential for water entering and exiting the process. Surface disposal and reinjection into wells may be an option as regulated 34 3. or seawater) may be suitable as is. chemical flocculants used in harvesting. and treatment (e. or other low. accumulated toxics. and their proximity to utilizable cultivation through facility design and siting. and residual live algal cells. residual nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer. groundwater. by the Environmental Protection Agency and already quality water stream. The blowdown water exiting the process will also most likely require treatment. while effectively Water recycling is essential. • GIS analysis of water resources. but the amount that can managing the accumulation of salt and other inhibitors be recycled depends on the algal strain. process. A critical water consumption. could pose a serious problem. would be a fresh water—a costly and often unsustainable option—or very costly and energy-intensive proposition. including saline Conservation of water can be addressed to some extent aquifers. Algal Cultivation  . Furthermore. The added cost of such systems must down saline aquifers. Note however • Analysis and definition of the regulatory landscape that evaporation plays a critical role in temperature surrounding discharge of water containing various maintenance under hot conditions through evaporative levels of salt. meaning that half movement (pumping costs) the culture volume must be processed daily.) of the recycled stream could be cost-prohibitive. or other remediation before use.g..” The amount of blowdown required for Because of the importance of issues surrounding the use salinity control is dependent upon the acceptable salt level of water. heavy metals (e. materials in the culture. and continually making up the volume with affect biodiversity of neighboring ecosystems or result low-quality water will concentrate salts. activated charcoal filtration. toxins. but live cells could adversely is fresh water. wastewater. and live cells or employ cooling towers to keep cultures cool will lose some if not possibly all of the water savings of such • Developing cultivation systems with minimal systems under these conditions (Flickinger. makeup water/recycle. This is an enormous amount of water (260. Incoming water (surface water. flocculants. moving around such large volumes of water is very energy-intensive and can impose a significant cost. it is desirable to recycle most of that water back to the culture. • Studying water recycle and methods to maximize recycle (and minimize blowdown). An advantage of sites that may have lower pan evaporation rates closed photobioreactors over open ponds is a reduced • Understanding the long-term effects of drawing rate of evaporation. or may require decontamination. To contain costs. disinfection. by disposing of a portion of the pond volume each day as “blowdown.water from oil wells.g. This can be prevented by adding Sterilization of blowdown water. and water double their biomass on a daily basis.000 gallons per day in the 1 ha example above). desalination. from flue gas). or biological inhibitors produced by the strains themselves could impair growth if recycled to the culture. including the geology of these be balanced against the cost savings and sustainability aquifers and associations with freshwater systems analysis for water usage for a given location. This could include reducing part of the analysis that goes into siting an algal facility evaporative cooling loads through such strategies will be to analyze the “pan evaporation” rates at specific as selecting thermotolerant strains of algae sites in conjunction with water cost and availability.1999). and other in the dissemination of genetically modified organisms. Disposal of the spent water. Closed systems that spray water on the surfaces metals). which could contain salts. however. • Investigating ways to reduce the cost of water and location. Some actively growing algal cultures can treatment. water.. the water being lost to evaporation practiced by the oil industry. municipal wastewater.

V. Y. Grubisic. P. Zhou. Wu. Elsevier.. Cooksey. Zhang. C. Boutte. and P. James and S. M. and C. Garcia-Reina. Hanisak.. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. Gutman. Doucha. Benson. (1994). Aquaculture Engineering. R. potential and speculative applications of seaweed cellular biotechnology-some specific comments on gelidium. Rapid quantitation of lipid in microalgae by time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance. 41(5). Journal of Microbiological Methods. 151-158. Q. Aquaculture. and P. W. (1999). Wilmotte. Novak. University of Florida. T. (1995). 331-337.References Azachi. T. M. (2005). 2002. Brussaard. V. Zamir. 56. P. Sadka. 333-345. Bao. 395–419. Competition between the rotifer brachionus rotundiformis and the ciliate euplotes vannus fed on two different algae. 241(1-4). 221:181-194. 51. Gocze. Eltgroth. M. Genetic breeding and seedling raising experiments with porphyra protoplasts. Callis... and D. and C.. T. R. M. 82(1). 355-368 Buck. 3. 112. 17. (1996). Zachleder and M. (1987). H. H. L. J. Bao. Reddy. A. 1-207. Flickinger MC. P. Factors underlying the variability of lipid droplet fluorescence in MA-10 lydig tumor cells. Gao. 512. S. K. Mycological Research. J. Production and cellular localization of neutral long-chain lipids in the haptophyte algae Isochrysis galbana and Emiliania huxleyi. M. Aflalo. M. R. and A. B. {Bibliography}Douskova. 139-145. Journal of Microbiological Method. parasitic on the green alga Haermatococcus. M. A. Zarka. and L. H. Response of offshore cultivated laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the north sea. Wiley. Review of Biomethane from Marine Biomass. 111. Cambridge University Press. Production and seeding of protoplasts of porphyra okhaensis (Bangiales. 191-218. Journal of Applied Phycology. (2004). Jha. 25. Hoffman. C. 674-691. X. (1994). Cheng.. J. Wolfe. 70-81. 16. Guckert. P. Rhodophyta) in laboratory culture. Q. Rusch. Chisti. ed. The Journal of Applied Phycology. R. C. D. Robledo. Drew SW. Gomezpinchetti. C. Becker. I. W. 198-211. L. McLachlan and Oliveira. The Journal of Applied Phycology. (1987). C. L. 65(3). Buchholz. C. K. Han. (2004). (2008). 36(2). (2005). Y. 17.. J. and W. Final Report to US DOE NETL. Plant Physiology. (2007).. Melo. Micropropagation by explants of Gracilaria. A. Dai. (1993). Watwood and G. Biodiesel from microalgae. S. New mode of Dunaliella biotechnology: Two phase growth for beta- carotene production. 65-68. Freeman. 16. 7. R. X. D. (1991). 331-343. Z. Candia. 127-131. 1000-1009. Journal of Microbiological Methods. J. Fisher. Gokhman and A. Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology: Fermentation. Cytometry. Dipakkore. Friedlander. D. M. and B. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.. Q. Williams and P. D. S. A. Bird. Chynoweth. and Z. Amsterdam. 6(6). The development of a mechanistic model to investigate the impacts of the light dynamics on algal productivity in a hydraulically integrated serial turbidostat algal reactor. Hydrobiologia. 179-185. Benson. Sosa. (2004). Vitova (2009). D. Y.. Cambridge. E.. Hydrobiologia. Xiong. Z. 1320-1329. Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs. P. Umysova. Aquaculture Engineering. Israeli R & D activities in seaweed cultivation. A. E. Q. M. Testing of primers for the study of cyanobacterial molecular diversity by DGGE.. B. J. Cultivation of gracilaria and other marcoalgage in Florida for energy consumption. The Journal of Applied Phycology. Hino (2004).. G. Benemann. B. Microalgae: Biotechnology and Microbiology. Buchholz. Seedling production using enzymatically isolated thallus cells and its application in porphyra cultivation. Chilensis Bird. 437-440. I. 2005. Collantes. Livansky. Aoki. G. 125-138. Goldshlag. (2006). 294-306. S. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. Actual. F. Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO2 to biomass. 203-213. Viral control of phytoplankton populations: A review. L. S. biocatalysis and bioseparation. S. Yuan and Q. 542-550. J. S. A. Biotechnology Advances. Balthasart and A. 15-28. in Seaweed Cultivation for Renewable Resources. Y. (2007). Y. Oswald. (2004).. Zhang. D. 129(3). Machat. Dai. Journal of Applied Physiology. M. J. Yang. 75(3). Aquaculture. C. (2008). K. K. 250. (2002). Buck. Fluorometric-determination of the neutral lipid- content of microalgal cells using nile red. Liu. Gutierrez-Wing and K. B. Shen. P. W. Boussiba. Isolation and characterization of a novel chytrid species (phylum Blastocladiomycota). Algal Cultivation  35 . R. M. B. Salt induction of fatty acid elongase and membrane lipid modifications in the extreme halotolerant alga Dunaliella salina. H. (2008)... Maeda and A. The offshore-ring: A new system design for the open ocean aquaculture of macroalgae. M. W. Ben-Amotz. J.

253-268. 133(4). Design and operation of an outdoor microalgae test facility. Journal of Biotechnology. R. Reed. M. Krajmalnik-Brown and R. Journal of Phycology. W. 328: 1-42. Wilkinson and M. T. Berlin. (1998). M.nrel. Vaulot. Biological Bulletin. Reddy.. 165-169. Dunahay. Regeneration from callus of undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (laminariales. 79-92. J.. Petty. J. K. L. Retrieved June 29. and H. Graham and R. C. Redfield.. MacKenzie and D. L. 10(7). Springer-Verlag Berlin. 46(6). An external delta-carbonic anhydrase in a free-living marine dinoflagellate may circumvent diffusion-limited carbon acquisition. Simon and D.. Molecular phylogeny of labyrinthulids and thraustochytrids based on the sequencing of 18S ribosomal RNA gene. Xu. (1999).S. 385-389. (2008). silicate and light-Dark cycles. (2006). Pre-genomic. Shifrin. 52(1). D. S. Algal Culturing Techniques. Kumar. R. and M. C. Algal Cultivation  . (1993).gov/docs/fy04osti/34796. 1804-1822. H. 147(3).Honda. P. Callus induction and thallus regeneration from callus of phycocolloid yielding seaweeds from the Indian coast. Wang. Nakahara. L.. 2007. Y. Oyler. Nature Reviews Microbiology. Exp. M.. B.. C. B. 19. N. M. Ganesan. K. A. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Phytoplankton cell counting by flow cytometry. D. Zhu. J. Rosenberg. (2007). A. B. Morse. Mapping of picoeucaryotes in marine ecosystems with quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene. Anderson . 596-602. Benemann and P. F. Microalgal carbon-dioxide-concentrating mechanisms: Chlamydomonas inorganic carbon transporters. (2005). The Journal of Applied Phycology. and S. (2008). (2008). Plant Physiology. Jha. S. G. D. Thiruppathi. Tillet. 430-436. H. Bot. M. (1981). (2009). Academic Press. A method for maintaining a continuous supply of marine diatoms by culture. 499-507. H. Vaulot. C. 604-612. (2006). G. 36 3. S. F. Allen. G. W. 17(4). A green light for engineered algae: Redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution. R. and H. K. Not. R. A. Eswaran. and post-genomic study of microbial communities involved in bioenergy. J. M.. Coury. Rao. T. Yokochi. 6. Reddy. Marie... S. Schaumann and T. phaeophyta). D. 43. T. Massana. Raghukumar. J. 1427-1436. Halden. San Diego. 261. Spalding. K. CA. Chisholm. (1938). Guillou. Lapointe. Tokuda. Brzezinski. Roessler. U. A look back at the U. Marie and D.. Miao. Weissman. 637-647. Jha. S. Betenbaugh. C. from www. J. A. Nakagiri. Ferreol and D. Environmental Microbiology. and Wu. (1999). 737-744. The Phycodnaviridae: The story of how tiny giants rule the world. N. Wilson. Spalding. R. Phytoplankton lipids-Interspecific differences snd effects of nitrate. E. Higashihara.pdf. FEMS Microbiology Ecology.: Viprey. A. 10110-10115. D. 126. 374-384. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. rhodophyta). Y. genomic. Kawashima. (1989). (2007). Vaulot. Rittman. 103... Tissue culture and regeneration of thallus from callus of gelidiella acerosa (gelidiales. R. (2005). and A. Wide genetic diversity of picoplanktonic green algae (chloroplastida) in the Mediterranean sea uncovered by a phylum-biased PCR approach. Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses. Phycologia. Neutral lipids in macroalgal spores and their role in swimming. L. M. Van Etten and M. (2008). Q. H. Hydrobiologia. Marine Biology. 75(1).. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. (2004). Martin H. J. and D. X. Kumar. W. T. N. 15-25. and B. R. J. Dipakkore. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19(5). An inorganic carbon transport system responsible for acclimation specific to air levels of CO2 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Sheehan. D. Ketchum. Department of Energy’s aquatic species program-Biodiesel from algae..

g. and systems to liquid transportation fuels requires processing autoflocculation in the form of photosynthetically driven steps such as harvesting (Dodd and Anderson. Future research in develop specific processing technologies to support those flocculation chemistry must take into account the following: designs and a fundamental understanding of how algal biology can impact harvesting and dewatering strategies.0. surfactants.. being considered. 1983). 2006. The final slurry concentration will depend on the extraction methods employed and will Optimizing flocculation methods. Koopman and chitosan. Manipulating suspension size of the algae aggregates. polyacrylamide polymers. algae harvesting (Sim et al. water form of forced flocculation usually involving chemical recycling and flocculate recovery are required. and off-shore pH with and without additives is also effective.02 . 2004. and recycling issues. salts. however. in recycled water on culture health and stability and lipid production must be understood and controlled. consider the imagine selecting/designing strains to aggregate on cue energy costs and siting issues associated with harvesting or designed with a particular flocculant interaction in and dewatering. circulation. 1993. bioreactors. well-managed high growth rate cultures due to their • Bioflocculation. 1977. 1975. Bioflocculation where algae are co- dewatering. combined with RD&D to be useful for promoting flocculation. type. Bare et al. 1969.. Alum. Pan et al. and extraction of fuel precursors (e. Poleman and Pauw. some into further downstream dewatering techniques. make harvesting more difficult. Chemical additives that bind algae or Flocculation and Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) was otherwise affect the physiochemical interaction between established for sewage treatment and later studied in algae are known to promote flocculation (Lee et al. the mechanism slurry concentration also impacts plant location because of algae-flocculant interactions.. is required to promote sedimentation at harvest. • Chemical flocculant recovery techniques are required Processing technologies depend on the algal feedstocks to minimize cost and control water effluent purity. 1997). Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering Conversion of algae in ponds.. Kwak et al. 1988). Addressing these issues requires careful mind. Culture manipulation techniques. and chemistry to maximize algae recovery of dry biomass increases. 2004. McGarry and Tongkasa. lipids cultured with another organism that promotes sedimentation and carbohydrates). mixtures. and small size (~1 to 30 µm). at least 1% algae given the known processing strategies (Borowitzka. 1998. lime. 2003. and fuel Microalgae and cyanobacteria remain in suspension in conversion and use must be considered.07% algae (~ 1 gm algae/5000 the advantages of no added chemicals (Chen. A determinations in particular processes.. Flocculation and Dissolved Air Flotation A number of different forms of forced flocculation have been employed. 1971). electroflocculation. Botes and Vanvuuren. and other man-made fibers are some chemical Lincoln. Likewise. Flocculation leading to sedimentation occurs • Optimized sedimentation tank designs with integration naturally in many older cultures.. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  37 . 1987). Knuckey et al. Phochinda and White. and on empirical of transportation. additives. 1988. therefore. impact the required energy input. water quality. 1991. energy costs climb steeply. Their small sizes. CO2 depletion for pH control has been studied (Sukenik Butterfi and Jones.1 Approaches for Microalgae further downstream extraction and fuel conversion processes must be understood and controlled. 2001). may analysis of engineering designs. therefore. cellulose. In managed cultures. As the desired percentage concentrations. only now being recognized as critically important.4. These energy-intensive processes are has also been considered (Lavoie and Delanoue. 1984). and Shelaf. and then air is bubbled 4. Processes that pertain to unicellular algae are quite different from the approaches applicable • The effect of residual flocculant or pH manipulation to macroalgae. Final will very likely depend on strain selection. 2005. This facilitates the transport of electrocoagulation must be scaled-up with cost and cells to the photoactive zone through pond or bioreactor energy analysis.. Flocculation is used to increase the additives that have been studied. Edzwald. gm water) must be concentrated to slurries containing Mollah et al.. Harvesting • The environmental impact of flocculant or pH Flocculation and Sedimentation manipulation in released water effluent. the presence of flocculant in 4. Cultures Finally. It is possible to feasible algae-to-fuel strategy must. electroflocculation and electrocoagulation offer with as low as 0.

Durability and 4. 2002. recovery is largely dependent on current level of centrifugation technology makes this bubble size and distribution through the suspension.through the suspension causing the algal clusters Centrifugation to float to the surface. For instance. filter materials with controlled hydrophobicity and/or algae affinity can be developed. but doing or dredging with cutters. acoustic focusing to concentrate algae at nodes. the growth substrate can be easily removed. separations and has been investigated in algal harvesting (Molina et al. Saidam and Butler. but will require extra space and • Filter material also influences filtration and recovery considerable time. however. Moving filters Currently. R&D have been proposed to harvest and dewater Downing et al. and high throughput encountered in flocculation and DAF. Significant cost and engineered design for further downstream processing. • The filter pore size is critically important as it is defined by the size of the algae species and algae Drying aggregation rate. Filtration designs Invariably. and have the ability to remove the algae later. Modern seaweed harvesting vessels can be equipped with pumps to direct harvested seaweeds directly into nets or other containment structures (Ugarte and Sharp.. 1991). where fuel precursors very expensive.. Other Harvesting Techniques and filtration without prior flocculation can be used A number of other techniques at various stages of to harvest and dewater algae (Ferguson et al.2 Approaches for Macroalgae blinding are also issues. the costs climb steeply with incremental becomes important as a distribution of microorganism temperature and/or time increases. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  . and bioharvesting. approach cost-prohibitive for most of the envisioned DAF facilities require optimized integration with any large-scale algae biorefineries. and flocculant reclamation) are also investments.. the blocking of filter dryers and other oven-type dryers have been used. Solutions involving either solar or wind efficiency. methane drum size. pores decreasing filter efficiency. Washing the filter is one practice. These include. but are not limited to. The efficiency is dependent on All of the issues arising from the use of flocculants the selected species (as related to size). microalgae. • Filtration design is an important variable with both Harvesting static and dynamic filtering operations. In addition to processing of large quantities of water and algae. energy savings must be realized before any widespread implementation of this approach can be carried out. Power costs will certainly influence derived from cultivated sources (Roesijadi et al.. Filtration Solid/liquid filtration technologies are well studied. leads to blinding. 1995. such mechanized harvesters require boats should consider minimal or no washing requirements. Centrifugation for sedimentation (e. pores. 1996). Small algae pass through larger Drying is required to achieve high biomass concentrations. so leads to re-dilution of the product. or ships for operation. 2009). suction. Application of mechanical 38 4. The algae-rich top layer is Centrifugation is widely used in industrial suspension scraped off to a slurry tank for further processing. about 90% is (Oswald. and reduction of filtering rates. The flocculant efficiency. operating costs. shrimp and further understanding of several issues: tilapia) grown with algae (Johnson and Wen. Air-drying is possible size will affect filtration efficiency and blinding rates. Decreasing pore Because drying generally requires heat.6 million dry metric tons have been used in drum and cylinder press designs of total seaweed harvested worldwide.. 2003). in low-humidity climates. have also been developed. and mechanized harvesting methods. the filter. 2001). Manual harvesting is common for both cultivated and natural systems. 2008). Culture purity However. the Microalgae and cyanobacteria present unique filtration use of organisms growing on immobilized substrates challenges because most strains considered for energy where the amount of initial water is controlled and feedstocks have cell diameters less than 10 µm.g. • An important step is recovering the algal biomass from which can involve mowing with rotating blades. Materials can be used that optimize filtration energy are also possible.g. floc optimization.. and can be optimized through are harvested from higher organisms (e. of the roughly 1. manipulation of Filtration is conceptually simple but potentially electric fields. design. water and technologies must consider large initial capital equipment algae purity.

Hydrothermal conversions are suited for environmental consequences of harvesting natural wet biomass and become efficient at 15 . Further. biomass prior to extraction or direct conversion have This has yet to be demonstrated on a commercially been categorized as follows (Bruton et al. To manage seaweed harvests. This will likely be a significant fraction of the will likely have less impact in procedures that can total energy cost of any algae-to-fuel process and a utilize whole seaweeds (Bruton et al.. Dewatering seaweeds such as Sargassum spp. with needs is required with consideration of capital equipment the degree of screening dependent on the mode of investments. and hydrothermal liquefaction have either as Macrocystis. This has important implications for plant design to answer simple • Dewatering questions like “What percentage of the total plant energy requirements or what percentage of that made available by Seaweeds immediately following harvest can have algae must be directed toward harvesting and dewatering?”. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  39 . and the amount of debris method. significant fraction of the total amount of energy available 4. The establishment of large offshore seaweeds may alleviate 4. such fermentation. laws have approaches 90% may be necessary. 2004). surface area to volume ratios. final algae concentration needed for the chosen extraction will likely have less debris. sand. may be amenable to mowing. Floating a high tolerance or requirement for water. cultivation in land-based pond systems will processes requiring further drying (Bruton et al. Although have been put in place in some countries (Pringle and some dewatering of seaweeds whose water content Tseng. scale of harvesting and dewatering. 2009). be harvested and the intervals between harvests to allow growth and recovery of biomass (Ugarte and Sharp. mechanized harvesting techniques. attached forms that tend to stand upright. new strategies should be developed to combine and integrate Preprocessing these processes in order to take an algae culture and The general preprocessing requirements for macroalgal convert it into slurry of a specific concentration. about 20 . 2009). stones. anaerobic digestion and fermentation. shredded or milled macroalgal biomass can go directly into either reactions As a result of growing concern about the potential or extractions..30% water content is noted to have a stabilizing harvesting may require retrieval and transport to shore. For part of the pretreatment process.. which is beneficial for transportation and other Similarly.85% water content (Peterson et al. with higher a biofuels feedstock in Ireland (Bruton et al.20% solids or populations of seaweed near-shore. Algae that are grown in suspension The cost of harvesting and dewatering will depend on the culture. although breakthroughs are still needed in each. given the issues related to sustainability and potential environmental importance as well as current cost and achievable consequences will need to be carefully evaluated. adhering epifauna and other forms of Ultimately.. The concept of large off-shore macroalgae farms and fermentation for alcohols. a unit operations analysis of energy input debris that should be removed before further processing. 2001). opportunities for products apart from fuels.. example. influence. the exact ratio of water stipulated the percentages of harvestable stock allowed to to solids for marine biomass remains to be determined. and hydrothermal liquefaction associated biorefineries has from the outset included for bio-oils. operations.harvesters in European seaweed operations have been Milling is used to reduce seaweeds to particle sizes that are described in a recent feasibility analysis for seaweeds as \more efficiently processed. e. maintenance. and depreciation. culture and end-use. as opposed to attached to the bottom culture. The exact nature of such mechanization will obviously depend on the form Macroalgae have less of a demand for dewatering as of cultivation and type of algae being cultured.g. 2008). by washing A critical gap is the energy requirements of these processes • Milling are not only largely unknown but unbounded. 2009). could be cultivated in may be more important as a method to increase shelf-life floating pens. 2009). and low growing attached forms such as and reduce weight and associated transportation costs if Gracilaria will require different approaches compatible with algae are to be transported from sites of harvest to distant their growth characteristics. 1989). In forms such as Laminaria processing plants (Bruton et al. • Removal of foreign objects and debris. will have higher reaction efficiency during anaerobic digestion for biogas. 2009): relevant scale and remains a significant challenge.3 Systems Engineering pressure from near-shore environments and create market While specific process technologies have been studied.. litter. Smaller particles. Dewatering to grown on off-shore rings (Buck and Buchholz. strict regulations 80 . for a range of dry weight content based on extraction Screening for debris is considered mandatory.. In require technology appropriate for that mode of culture. Anaerobic digestion.

Water Science and Technology. D. Curley. Jones. Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Ireland Buck. Water Science and Technology. C. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. 117. Algae. Low cost reclamation using the advanced integrated wastewater pond systems technology and reverse osmosis. (2004). Progress in Water Technology. 5(4).B. E.. based on the latent heat References Bare. and C.J. (2009). 85(3). T. algal biofuel production schemes at scale will of 5 watt-hours/gram if the energy content of lipids. Possible approaches may include developing strains of hours/gram of algae for harvesting. Water Supply: IWSA/IAWPRC Joint Specialized Conference on Coagulation Flocculation.. Bruton.B. 300. 2000). (2005). (2000). C..J. M. Separation and Purification Technology. Micro-Algal Biotechnology. Middlebrooks. 9(1).. Lerat. M. V. A review of the potential of marine algae as a source of biofuel in Ireland.M.B. Large-scale algae culture systems. G. (1975).. 357-394.J. J. 30 (7). (1977).J. (2005).B. B. N.F. Removal of clay and blue-green algae particles through zeta potential and particle size distribution in the dissolved air flotation process. Y. Illman. (2002). along with innovative solutions to lower the in harvested biomass.R. L. 231. Koopman. Vanvuuren. 9(3). J. H. Z. 674-691. 47(1). (1983). Ferguson.. Aquacultural Engineering. 852-859. J. Increase in chlorella strains calorific values when grown in low nitrogen media. 31(3-4). (1987). (1995). H. Harvesting of algae grown in agricultural wastewaters. B.J. J. energy example shown below provides some food for thought balance can become an issue in systems that propose regarding harvesting and dewatering technologies. Water Science and Technology. D. 27(10). Transactions-American Geophysical Union. Brown. 113. (1969). M. 67.A. Harvesting of scenedesmus-obliquus in wastewaters-auto-flocculation or bioflocculation. H. 35(3). 95.. Response of offshore cultivated laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the north sea. Water Pollution Control Federation Research Journal. Dublin.L. Lundquist. Kwak.R. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. B. Autoflotation harvesting of algae from high-rate pond effluents. Borowitzka. T. G. However. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Green. Downing. Kim. Ferguson. Borowitzka.54 watt-hours/gram. 11. Cambridge University Press. and proteins and the typical percentage integrated systems in order to overcome this challenge. Bracco.. Dissolved air flotation for the removal of algae and inorganic turbidity on a large-scale. Ku. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. Comparison of dissolved air flotation and direct filtration. Filtration. Jones. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  .R. et al. Delanoue. R. W. likely need to implement innovative technologies and carbohydrates. Logsdon. Chen.. M. E. and M. 250. Won. (38). and dissolved air flotation. de-watering. Zubieta. 631-635.M. Rasmussen. 6(1). The energy requirements for energy intensity of harvesting and drying algae. Preliminary Look at Energy Balance In spite of gaps in data precluding more detailed The energy content of most algae cells is of the order analyses. Johnson.K. coagulants. (1988). and algae with much higher energy content than available drying as a function of the volume percentage of algae today.H. Jung.Y. Shales. Botes. 612. (2010).S. of each in algae are considered (Illman et al. Oswald.F Frampton. A quick and preliminary energy balance of vaporization of water at 0. F. A. Robert. Aquaculture.. It is possible to estimate the energy requirements in watt. 153. Anderson.P. R. 525-534. Buchholz. Lyons. (2006). J. 50(11). Butterfi. (1991). S. S. I.. A. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. W..J. Knuckey.from algae. Lavoie.X. to take algal biomass and concentrate / dry it to enable downstream processing and extraction because of the high volumes of water that must be evaporated away. C.C. B. Lincoln. D. flocculation and sedimentation and the belt filter press are expected to be minimal. E. 713. Agricultural Wastes. (27). Scragg. Dodd.H. 45(1). 40 4. Algae removal using dissolved air flotation. Stanley. & Wen. Production of microalgal concentrations by flocculation and their assessment as aquaculture feeds. bubbles. Integrated high-rate pond algae harvesting system. 133. Kwon. Sedimentation and Flotation. (1993). Edzwald. Sustainable Energy Ireland. J.

150(1-3). Overview of a workshop on production and utilization of commercial seaweeds . 199. A.W. Science and Technology. M. (20). et al. 43(5)... W..C. C. (2001). Chuang. C. (2003). Water Pollution Control Federation Research Journal .. A. F. 1. present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation. China. M.G. A new approach to seaweed management in Eastern Canada: The case of ascophyllum nodosum. (1996). E-H Belarbi. D. Mollah. 32-65. (2001). Pauw. Tongkasa. (1998). (19). W. S. White. 185.Y. B. 14. C. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. W. A. 63-70. K. M. 16(1). 327. Sharp. T. Effects of harvesting method and growth stage on the flocculation of the green alga botryococcus braunii. J.A. J. (1989). A. 1-7. 142. Energy & Environmental Science.S. The Journal of Applied Phycology. (2003). E. Water reclamation and algae harvesting.. G. (26). Kim. Comparison of centrifugation. (1997). H. and J. 51. Kwon. Fundamentals. dissolved air flotation and drum filtration techniques for harvesting sewage-grown algae.Lee. Pan. R. E. Oswald. Benemann. J. (2008). Huang. J. Forster. Antal. Ugarte. 83-89. Becker.P.J. Peterson.M. Downstream Processing: Harvesting and Dewatering  41 . G. E. P. McGarry. R. Phoochinda. Goh. Chisti. Y. Biol.. 24(5). Biomass. Roesijadi. (27). (1988). Algal autoflocculation-verification and proposed mechanism. (1984). M.C.S. Sukenik.. (1991). Molina Grima E. Battelle Pacific Northwest Division Report Number PNWD-3931. Froling. R. Lachance. Techno-economic feasibility analysis of offshore seaweed farming for bioenergy and biobased products. Water. M. A. C. B114. (2008).G. Pringle.J.. Butler. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub. Acién Fernández. Huesemann. Dewatering characteristics of algae-containing alum sludge. Cah.Qingdao. N. (2004). Algae removal by horizontal flow rock filters. Journal of Biotechnology Advances. (1). Tester. Advances in Slow Sand and Alternative Biological Filtration. Poelman. Conservation. Robles Medina. Potential of electrolytic flocculation for recovery of micro- algae. 824. Letters in Applied Microbiology. Environmental Technology. 24(1). 4.R. Saidam.D. Mar 42. D. Yoon. Sim. Introduction to advanced integrated wastewater ponding systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials. (1971). Oh. A. 1987. Shelaf. Copping..... 1. H. and J. Y. Wu.B.. Tseng.. D. Resources. M.P. Colloids and Surfaces A-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. and Recycling. S. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. Vogel. 491–515. F. Removal of algae using froth flotation. G. 87.and supercritical water technologies. G.

Extraction of Products from Algae While relatively limited volumes of bioproducts are are attempting to bypass this step—the dynamics of currently produced from algal feedstocks. As such the development of any extraction process as single cells suspended in water at concentrations below must also account for the fact that the tissue structure 1% solids. Lipid Extraction sonication. For waste treatment. autoclaving. and (3) solvate the >40%. algal biomass extraction in aqueous phase systems serves as a starting suffers from a lack of well-defined and demonstrated place for industrial-scale extraction operations. Assuming a system that requires extraction of oils and lipids from harvested biomass—as noted. which is dependant on the algal species and growth status. pulverized biomass. application of organic solvents. different Algal biofuel schemes that rely on the accumulation of harvest process operations (discussed in the Chapter 4) intra-cellular lipids are the focus of this discussion... Recent work on extraction of lipids from three different 5. some systems 42 5. Cell Rupture) component for extraction.. as well as the be successful. 2010) and osmotic shock. any extracting solvent must be able to (1) fuel conversion process. Extraction of Products from Algae   . While many terrestrial feedstocks penetrate through the matrix enclosing the lipid material. 2008). and enzyme reactions (Mata macroalgae (Aresta. extraction bypass schemes that attempt to engineer algal systems techniques employed must be efficient and effective. shown to improve methane gas production and biosolids reduction in sludge digestion (Rittman et al. though applications outside of analytical lipid extracts and preparation for conversion to biodiesel labs are unclear. extraction step by either converting whole algal biomass or Different methods can be used to disrupt the cell membrane by inducing the secretion of the desired product directly.. Extraction depends on identifying the particular biological Mechanical Disruption (i. largely in the realm of laboratory-scale processes that serve analytical rather than biofuel production goals...and laboratory-scale procedures. Many effective of the biomass must be disrupted prior to extraction. Virot knowledge exists for the separation of plant biomass et al. extraction techniques require concentrated substrates.1 Current Practices for types of oleaginous microalgae compared bead beating. 2010). For this reason. 2003). Additionally. extraction of lipids from microalgae (Lee et al. and extraction algal biofuels as competitive bulk commodity. 2005) et al. 2010). Non-mechanical methods include biofuel development.5. using solvents to “milk” algal recovery/removal of high-value products. and acid. or for the sonication for cell disruption.. 2008. but these techniques often rely increase efficiencies of vegetable lipid and oil extraction on freeze dried. little is known about the scale. osmotic shock. While considerable is a promising development (Cravotto et al. To operations could affect extraction processes. and microwaves and suggested that microwave disruption prior to solvent The basis for lipid extraction from algal biomass is extraction is the most efficient method (Lee et al. Mechanical disruption can include cell homogenizers. Laboratory-scale comparisons of process such as freezing. Lipid extraction includes the following approaches: Existing extraction techniques are mainly suitable for solvent-based extraction relying on microwaves and or analytical. microalgae and cyanobacteria may be cultivated lipid. can be removed from their environment at total solids (2) physically contact the lipid material. and autoclaving of lipids and oils at larger-scale is limiting the algal-based (Mata et al. sewage sludge with “focused pulse” sonication has been up separation challenges for extracted algal lipids. To produce cells without disrupting cellular functions. and Barberio. 2010). to use elevated temperature and pressure processes that some algae-to-biofuels processes attempt to bypass the force the solvent into contact with desired biopolymers. pretreatment of (Zhang et al. A shortfall of relevant information on efficient extraction bead mills (or bead-beating).e. This generally requires that the native structure their offshore production and harvesting.. base. Dibenedetto. industrial-scale methods for extracting and separating of oils and lipids required for enabling biofuel production. While macroalgae are more like traditional and cell walls may present formidable barriers to solvent feedstocks. thus a high degree of concentration may be necessary before Effective mechanical disruption can help offset the need some types of extraction can begin. The use of microwaves to disrupt cells and have been carried out. 2008). ultrasounds. different logistical challenges arise from access.. that secrete products directly into the growth medium. prior to the application of the extraction solvents.

This method was applied to dried microalgal well against the hexane/ethanol co-solvent system. (i. acetyl chloride). 1998).g. 2000). this approach achieved by adding both hexane and water in proportions suggested that a one-step reaction that added the alcohol that create a two phase system (hexane and an aqueous (e. Consequently. 2007).g. methanol) and acid catalyst (e.. other combinations lipids and cell structure. 1990). 1959). it was found that when (2) the ability of a second less polar co-solvent to better applying direct transesterification using an acid catalyst match the polarity of the lipids being extracted. The lipids mainly separate to the extraction (Lewis et al. and Dyer co-solvent method. prior to their dissolution in the of co-solvents have been proposed for the extraction of monophasic system of water. In general. 1994). single alcohol To increase analytical efficiency. lipids: hexane/isopropanol for tissue (Hara & Radin. solubilize.e. They explained lipids (i.. but never more than 90% of the Bligh and recoveries of volatile medium chain triglycerides. water (which is not miscible with chloroform) is marine tissue that contained more than 2% lipids but added to the co-solvent mixture until a two-phase system worked well for samples that contained less than 2% develops in which water and chloroform separate into lipids. It was found that the when selecting a co-solvent system to extract lipids are: entire reaction could be shortened to 10 minutes if the mixture was incubated at 100˚C under a sealed cap. making it more difficult for less polar solvents such microalgae (Nagle & Lemke.Organic Co-solvent Mixtures Application of Organic Two-Solvent Systems for The concept of like dissolves like is the basis behind the Lipid Extraction from Microalgae: earliest and well-known co-solvent extraction procedure Iverson et al. if not slightly better than alcohol/ Bligh and Dyer co-solvent system). chloroform. the unsaponifiable lipids such as pigments. chloroform. 1990). and extract the lipids.. Extraction of Products from Algae   43 . at 100˚C for an hour under sealed cap would increase applications using pure alcohol (ethanol and 1-butanol) fatty acid concentrations measured (as compared to performed similarly. ethanol and Direct Transesterification of Lipids into isopropanol) have been suggested in place of methanol. Similarly. and other lipid and non-lipid contaminants) nonpolar solvents weakening the association between the (Fajardo et al. biomass. and hexane/isopropanol for lipids. acetyl chloride) hydroalcoholic) that partition the extracted lipids into directly to the biomass sample and followed with heating the nonpolar hexane (Fajardo et al. 2007). hexane/ethanol for microalgae suggest that the water will form a solvent shell around the (Cartens et al. thereby improving downstream separations. it has been demonstrated that the extraction of lipids was significantly more efficient when solvents were added in order of increasing polarity (i.. pure alcohol solutions of eliminate the need to use antioxidants to protect unsaturated greater carbon length (such as butanol) have not compared lipids. has been promoted because hexane and alcohol will It is also noteworthy that the extraction efficiency was not readily separate into two separate phases when water is improved (when water was added first).. The sequence of solvent addition can also affect two immiscible layers. After the extraction reaction is grossly underestimated the lipid content in samples of complete. 2000).e. Starting from freeze dried chloroform layer and can then be recovered for analysis. In other cases.. Lepage and Roy (1984) (e. dimethyl sulfoxide/petroleum ether for yeast extraction systems applied to “wet” biomass because they (Park et al. 2007). 1996). In general. their results in terms of initial contact of the biomass with lipoproteins. Separation is then improved recovery of fatty acids.. These important results have a key impact on liquid phase 1978). In these applications. despite the added added. 5.g. less volatile and toxic alcohols (e. agitation in the form of sonication or additional methanol.. the alcohol adipose tissue without prior extraction or purification for is first added as the extracting solvent. these findings suggest that membrane may be necessary.. and methanol..g. Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMES) One example is the hexane/ethanol extraction co-solvent system (Grima et al. The hexane system as chloroform to contact. the efficiency of the reaction increased when a second “less polar” solvent such as To avoid the use of elevated temperature and pressure to diethyl ether or toluene was mixed with the methanol to push the solvent into contact with the analyte (at the cost modify the polarity of the reaction medium (Carvalho and of a very high input of energy). 1-butanol and ethanol) solvents have been tried proposed the direct transesterification of human milk and (Nagle & Lemke. (2001) found that the Bligh and Dyer method (Bligh and Dyer. disruption of the cell Malcata.. More. (1) the ability of a more polar co-solvent to disrupt the cell membrane and thus make it sufficiently porous and Continuing efforts along this path.. 2005).. give relatively high hexane mixtures. In general.e. Chloroform will extract more than just the saphonifiable methanol. and then water) (Lewis. biomass in a modified approach to include hexane in the reaction phase in order to avoid a final purification These results suggest that the two most important criteria step (Rodriguez-Ruiz et al.

. In addition to improving yields and reducing loss of cell viability and extraction of membrane-bound extraction time. to selectively to their original bioreactor for continued growth and extract polar compounds from lipid-rich samples. the cells can be returned extractable material from various processes. Compressed gas is used to purge the different organic phases indicated that cells remained sample extract from the cell into a collection vessel.. break down the cell membrane.. 2009). is enclosed in a sample cartridge that is filled with an By applying a measurement of solvent hydrophobicity extraction fluid and used to statically extract the sample based on the partition coefficient of the solvent in a two- under elevated temperature (50 . can be retained in the cell during the extraction phase (using a solvent front pumped through the sample at the This work has served as the basis for the development of appropriate temperature and pressure). The single solvent systems at elevated temperature and ASE . a step that also requires energy input. on dairy manure effluent (Mulbry et al.3000 psi) conditions for short time periods and activity tests of Dunaliella salina in the presence of (5 . This observation is a key driving force behind the consideration of solvent extraction Selective Extraction systems at elevated temperature and pressure. however.30 g samples of dried biomass. Denery and coworkers optimized the extraction of carotenoids from Dunaliella salina All the preceding co-solvent systems. Hejazi et al. and showed that higher or equal extraction efficiencies remain largely bench-scale methods that are difficult (compared to traditional solvent technology) could be to scale up to industrial processes due to the actual achieved with the use of less solvent and shorter extraction solvent toxicity and the low carrying capacity of the times. What remains unclear is the effectiveness of such • the elevated pressures can reduce the dielectric an approach at large scale in terms of how to handle constant of an otherwise immiscible solvent (and large amounts of biomass. Their Accelerated Solvent Extraction observations were that solvents with lower hydrophobicity Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was first proposed reach critical concentrations more easily and in the in the mid 1990s (Richter et al. viable and active in the presence of organic solvents with a log P (octanol ) > 6 and that β-carotene can be extracted ASE is applicable to solid and semi-solid samples that more easily than chlorophyll by biocompatible solvents. the effect of the solvent on uses organic solvents at high pressure and temperatures the membrane decreased and the extraction efficiency above their boiling point. free fatty acids. Accordingly. screening viability (500 . and optimize the energy cost. 2004) and lipids from microalgae (Schäfer.200˚C) and pressure phase system of octanol and water.95% pressure have gained favor for two principle reasons: of the fatty acid content in the harvested microalgae • the elevated temperature and pressure increase the compared to 44 . ASE of higher hydrophobicity. must use dried Consequently. By using solvents technique on 1 . reaction ASE is more efficient if extracting solvent. and production of triglycerides for biofuels production. The latter is also polarity of the lipids (Herrero et al. to all pores within the biomass matrix and. noteworthy in the context that ASE by definition uses non-aqueous solvents and therefore. extracted 85 . The performance of ASE extraction was compared solvents (i. the polarity) to values that match the lipids. (Denery et al. being extracted is as important as the miscibility of the analyte in the solvent. the issue of solvent access to the material biomass... For to fractionate lipids from biological samples (ref).e. If this process can be 44 5. 2004). depending on the solvent. 2006). it is only efficient on biomass samples to that of traditional Folch method for microalgae grown containing less than 2% w/w lipids). It has been proposed a technology that proposes to use solvents such as decane for the extraction of liquid extracts (Richter et al. using the process. a solid sample for both chlorophyll and β-carotene decreased as well. concentrated for the extraction of triglycerides without 1998). In general. example. ASE can also be applied to remove co. 1996.e. sample-solvent medium) depends upon its ability to solubilize the target ratio. and time have been optimized lipids coupled with its miscibility with methanol.55% of the fatty acids extracted by rate of mass transfer and degree of solvent access the Folch method in the first solvent extraction cycle... Extraction of Products from Algae   .the effectiveness of the second co-solvent (i. Conceptually. extraction temperature. Denery et al.. and dodecane in the presence of live microalgal cells. separate out desirable by analogy. 1996). some have proposed a modified technique to “milk” oils or neutral lipids from algae using biocompatible solvents and applied sonication.10 min). (2002) proposed the two-phase system of aqueous and organic phases for the selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalgae Dunaliella salina.

. sulfur Subcritical Water Extraction hexafluoride. However. Metzger and cooled back down to room temperature. CO2 because of its preferred critical properties (i. phototrophically or heterotrophically. it has been applied for the selective extraction the supercritical fluid. higher productivity Castro et al.g. One of the more attractive points to supercritical hemicellulose as a pretreatment prior to its use as a fluid extraction is that after the extraction reaction has fermentation substrate (Mok et. of the more important advantages described for subcritical economical production of biofuels from oleaginous water extraction include shorter extract times. as the water is from microalgae (Mendes et al. water extraction. this method may provide extraction of substances from solid substrates. The technique. The basic premise to subcritical water extraction the extracted product remains as a liquid or solid. 2007).g. Supercritical extraction is often employed in batch mode. Use of methanol as the solvating fluid With respect to microalgae. water. pressure are lowered to atmospheric conditions. In this system up to subcritical temperatures. lower costs of the extracting agent. liquid feeds (Reverchon et al. and chemical inertness (Luque de Castro et al.. 1992). The majority of applications have used the extraction of lipids that cannot be transesterified. is that water. Extraction of Products from Algae   45 . 1999). triglycerides) that excludes (Brunner. Some degradation. 2005).9 bar).. In this 2006). the solvent and product can be of essential oils from plant matter (Eikani et al. products miscible Largeau. Some pressures of 241 . 2006).. methanol. 2001) . 2006). Large-scale design scenario.. at temperatures point can be adjusted as can the time of the extraction. as well as functional ingredients and lipids temperatures as discussed above. e. non-photosynthetic algae are grown using will also require a significant cooling system to cool sugars as energy source and using standard industrial the product down to room temperature to avoid product fermentation equipment (Barclay et al. nitrous oxide. low toxicity. The temperature and pressure above the critical liquefaction) is based on the use of water. Lipids have been selectively extracted at the high temperature and pressure become immiscible from macroalgae at temperatures of 40 . however. 2006). 2006).applied to microalgae slurries with suspended solid extraction techniques have been used in the commercial concentrations as low as 1 wt%. Supercritical fluid avoidance of expensive extraction scheme(s). a unique avenue for the selective extraction of lipids caffeine from coffee beans. ease of scale-up. higher microalgae via supercritical processing is challenged quality of extracts. al. which can moderate critical temperature of 31. originally termed “pressurized hot but the process can also be operated continuously (Brunner. the ability to 5. this approach significantly Supercritical Fluid Extraction reduces the capital and operating cost for an extraction Supercritical fluid extraction utilizes the enhanced solvating process. There is also the added benefit of solvent extraction of essential oils from plants (Reverchon et access into the biomass matrix that occurs at the higher al.50˚C and at lower temperatures and can be easily separated. under these conditions. attractive aspects is the use of water as the solvent. and pressure high enough to keep the liquid state (Soto and Luque de Castro. been completed and the extracted material dissolved into however.e. 2005). 1994. 1999). scaling up the process that is developed mainly for analytical usage. the fluid returns to its original gaseous state while al. just below the critical temperature. but other fluids used have included ethane. however.... private companies have engineered algae that secrete oil into the fermentation media that can be recovered and later refined into a biofuel.” was initially applied to whole biomass 2005).. whether grown has the effect of converting lipids.379 bar (Chueng.. is the difficulty with designing a system at Other methods for extraction and fractionation include large scale and the high-energy load required to heat the the production of oils using heterotrophic algae. as well as n-butane and pentane (Herrero et Subcritical water extraction (also known as hydrothermal al. 1994). for more than two decades suitable for biofuels (e. as with accelerated solvent Heterotrophic Production extraction. creating additional energy use challenges. In addition. and saponins from oil-seeds (Güçlü-Üstündağ et case.1˚C and pressure of be difficult to separate from the desired lipids. by the same issues of energy-intensive processing and and environmental compatibility (Herrero et al.. ethane. 73. one of the more to biodiesel (see Chapter 6 for more detail). thereby eliminating the need for the dewatering step. It can be processed using solid and compared to photosynthetic systems.. A major constraint. 2007). as well as pigments (such as chlorophyll). The potential benefits of this approach are the power of fluids above their critical point (Luque de use of standard fermentation systems.. easily separated downstream once the temperature and functional ingredients from microalgae (Herrero et al.. 1999). becomes less polar and organic compounds are more soluble than at room Supercritical fluid extraction has been applied for the temperature. More recently. via transesterification.

K. principal motivation behind the application of extraction but it does serve to highlight the need for innovation techniques at elevated temperatures and pressures. 2007. 123-129. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. Güçlü-Üstündag. 73(8). 898-902.. Subcritical water extraction of essential oils from coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum L. Very little information is available on this critical The extraction process is affected by the choice of step that is necessary before converting the algal upstream and downstream unit operations and vice biocrude into finished fuels and products. et al. intracellular benchmark can be considered: the extraction process water can prove to be a barrier between the solvent per day should consume no more than 10% of the total and the solute. Increased of sugar-based feedstocks.R. Pressurized fluid extraction of carotenoids from Haematococcus pluvialis and Dunaliella salina and kavalactones from Piper methysticum.. & Mazza.X. 5049–5059. et al. as Btu. & Malcata. produced per day. However. 2004. Journal of Food Engineering. 80(2). G. Pressurized low polarity water extraction of saponins from cow cockle seed. Mechanical disruption can large-scale heterotrophic “algal-refinery” operations. reduce the pressure and temperature requirements. the issue of solvent energy load. Presence of Water Associated with the Biomass such as chlorophyll and non. S. 1994. Lipid extraction from the microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. 21-33. Chief amongst is the logistical challenge of that would normally not be contacted by solvents under securing a sustainable biomass feedstock to supply to feed atmospheric conditions. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 67(1-2). Comparison between extraction of lipids and fatty acids from microalgal biomass. F. Agric. J.. Food Chem. & Rowshanzamir. Grima.. 501(2). Cravotto. Brunner. Increasing the temperature helps to disrupt the solute- matrix interactions and to reduce the viscosity and surface tension of the water.transesterifiable lipids. Carvalho. 1994. to achieve sustainable commercial-scale systems. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-chromatographic analysis of marine lipids: Insight studies.H.. water can either promote the formation of emulsions in the presence of ruptured cells or participate For sustainable biofuels production. significant downsides pressure facilitates enhancing the transport of the solvent to this approach include many of the same feedstock to the analytes that have been trapped in pores.. G. Cartens. At the cellular level.M.. Analytica Chimica Acta.maintain the integrity of the fermentation catalyst and use contact between the solvent and the solute. W. J. 619–630. The presence of water can cause problems at both ends at larger scales. F. E.. 1025–1031. Journal of Food Engineering. G. et al.2 Challenges Extraction processes can yield undesirable components. A. Extraction of Products from Algae   . a preliminary look at the energy balance as the miscibility of the analyte in the solvent. et al. M. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. M. Separation of Desired Extracts from Solvent Stream 5. 46 5. 120–126. & Abril. 15(5). When present in the bulk Energy Consumption and Water Recycle solution. 175–181.. Heterotrophic production of long chain omega-3 fatty acids utilizing algae and algae-like microorganisms. 1996. Golmohammad. 53(13). Improved extraction of vegetable oils under high-intensity ultrasound and/or microwaves..R. The logistics challenges faced by the nascent lignocellulosic pressure also helps to force the solvent into matrices industry. Denery. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2007. et al. 2007.). 109(2). Meager. J. 2005. thereby improving the References Barclay. Fajardo. Lipid-Fett. In this context. Supercritical fluids: technology and application to food processing.P.. 71(9).3. J. the following in side reactions. 735–740. Balsevich. 80(2). Eicosapentaenoic acid from the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Journal of Food Engineering. As discussed in access to the material being extracted is as important Section 4. 2008. 6(2). A. Eikani. This is a does not suggest that this is an insurmountable barrier. 2005. versa.. 955–959.

Hara, A. & Radin, N.S., 1978. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicity solvent. Analytical Biochemistry, 90(1), 420–426.
Hejazi, M.A. et al., 2002. Selective extraction of carotenoids from the microalga Dunaliella salina
with retention of viability. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 79(1), 29-36.
Herrero, M., Cifuentes, A. & Ibanez, E., 2006. Sub-and supercritical fluid extraction of functional ingredients from different
natural sources: Plants, food-by-products, algae and microalgae A review. Food chemistry, 98(1), 136–148.
Iverson, S.J., Lang, S.L. & Cooper, M.H., 2001. Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for
total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids, 36(11), 1283–1287.
Lee, J. et al., 2010. Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction
from microalgae. Bioresource Technology, 101(1), S75-S77.
Lepage, G. & Roy, C.C., 1984. Improved recovery of fatty acid through direct transesterification without
prior extraction or purification. The Journal of Lipid Research, 25(12), 1391-1396.
Lewis, T., Nichols, P.D. & McMeekin, T.A., 2000. Evaluation of extraction methods for recovery of fatty acids
from lipid-producing microheterotrophs. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43(2), 107–116.
Luque de Castro, M.D., Jimenez-Carmona, M.M. & Fernandez-Perez, V., 1999. Towards more rational techniques
for the isolation of valuable essential oils from plants. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 18(11), 708–716.
Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A. & Caetano, N.S., 2010. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other
applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 217-232.
Mendes, R. et al., 1994. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of hydrocarbons from the
microalgaBotryococcus braunii. Journal of Applied Phycology, 6(3), 289-293.
Metzger, P. & Largeau, C., 2005. Botryococcus braunii: a rich source for hydrocarbons and related
ether lipids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 66(5), 486-496.
Mulbry, W. et al., 2009. Optimization of an Oil Extraction Process for Algae from the Treatment of
Manure Effluent. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 86(9), 909–915.
Nagle, N. & Lemke, P., 1990. Production of methyl ester fuel from microalgae. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 24(1), 355–361.
Park, P.K., Kim, E.Y. & Chu, K.H., 2007. Chemical disruption of yeast cells for the isolation of
carotenoid pigments. Separation and Purification Technology, 53(2), 148–152.
Reverchon, E., Iol & Marco, A.D., 2006. Supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation of
natural matter. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 38(2), 146-166.
Richter, B.E. et al., 1996. Accelerated solvent extraction: a technique for sample preparation. Anal. Chem, 68(6), 1033–1039.
Rittmann, B.E., Krajmalnik-Brown, R. & Halden, R.U., 2008. Pre-genomic, genomic and post-
genomic study of microbial communities involved in bioenergy.
Rodriıguez-Ruiz, J. et al., 1998. Rapid simultaneous lipid extraction and transesterification
for fatty acid analyses. Biotechnology techniques, 12(9), 689–691.
Schäfer, K., 1998. Accelerated solvent extraction of lipids for determining the fatty acid
composition of biological material. Analytica Chimica Acta, 358(1), 69–77.
Soto Ayala, R. & Luque de Castro, M.D., 2001. Continuous subcritical water extraction as a useful
tool for isolation of edible essential oils. Food chemistry, 75(1), 109–113.
Virot, M. et al., 2008. Microwave-integrated extraction of total fats and oils. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1196-1197, 57-64.

5. Extraction of Products from Algae   47

6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies
Potentially viable fuels that can be produced from algae products, and this conservation law must also hold
range from gaseous compounds like hydrogen and methane, true for the algae biorefineries of the future if they
to alcohols and conventional liquid hydrocarbons, to are to achieve significant market penetration.
pyrolysis oil and coke. Attractive targets for this effort,
however, are the liquid transportation fuels of gasoline, A large number of potential pathways exist for the
diesel, and jet fuel. These fuel classes were selected as the conversion from algal biomass to fuels. These pathways can
best-value targets because 1) they are the primary products be classified into the following three general categories:
that are currently created from imported crude oil for the
bulk of the transportation sector, 2) they have the potential 1) Those that focus on the direct algal production
to be more compatible than other biomass-based fuels with of recoverable fuel molecules (e.g., ethanol,
the existing fuel-distribution infrastructure in the U.S., and hydrogen, methane, and alkanes) from
3) adequate specifications for these fuels already exist. algae without the need for extraction;

The primary objective of this chapter is to summarize a 2) Those that process whole algal biomass
number of potentially viable strategies for converting algal to yield fuel molecules; and
biomass into replacements for petroleum gasoline, diesel, 3) Those that process algal extracts (e.g., lipids,
and jet fuel. When a fuel meets all customer requirements, carbohydrates) to yield fuel molecules.
it is referred to as “fit for purpose.” While a successful These technologies are primarily based on similar
fuel-conversion strategy will address the full range of methods developed for the conversion of terrestrial
desired fit-for-purpose properties (e.g., distillation range, plant-based oils and products into biofuels, although the
ignition characteristics, energy density, etc.), these desired compositional complexities of the output streams from
fuel characteristics are driven primarily by customer algae must be dealt with before these can be applied
requirements and are discussed later in Chapter 8. This effectively. Pros and cons of these pathways within each
chapter focuses on fuel conversion strategies from a variety of these categories are discussed below, and a summary
of perspectives to establish the current state-of-the-art, of each fuel-conversion technology is given. Inputs,
as well as identify critical challenges and roadblocks. complexity, cost, and yields are provided (where known),
and key barriers and RD&D opportunities are listed.
Several emerged the Algal Roadmap Workshop in
relation to conversion of algal feedstocks to fuels. These
are noted here to help establish a reasonable framework 6.1 Direct Production of
for the most promising concepts for algal biofuels.
Biofuels from Algae
• First, the feedstock, conversion process, and
The direct production of biofuel through heterotrophic
final fuel specifications are highly interdependent
fermentation and growth from algal biomass has certain
and must be considered together if an optimal
advantages in terms of process cost because it can
process is to be identified. As a result, accurate
eliminate several process steps (e.g., oil extraction)
and detailed feedstock characterization (including
and their associated costs in the overall fuel production
both composition and variability) is essential,
process. Heterotrophic growth also allows for maintaining
since this is an upstream boundary condition for
highly controlled conditions, which first could be oriented
the entire downstream fuel-conversion process.
toward biomass production and then oil production. Such
• Second, life cycle analysis of energy and carbon will a system can generate extremely high biomass (hundreds
be a key tool in selecting the preferred fuel conversion of grams per liter) and a high percentage of that biomass
technologies from those discussed in this chapter. as lipid (well over 50%). The system is readily scaled up
• Third, the greatest challenge in algal fuel conversion is and there is an enormous potential to use various fixed
not likely to be how to convert lipids or carbohydrates carbon feedstocks (which would bring down the cost of
to fuels most efficiently, but rather how best to use production). These approaches are quite different from
the algal remnants after the lipids or other desirable the usual algal biofuel processes that use algae to produce
fuel precursors have been extracted. All of the biological oils which is subsequently extracted and used as
petroleum feedstock that enters a conventional a feedstock for liquid fuel production, typically biodiesel.
petroleum refinery must leave as marketable There are several biofuels that can be produced directly
from algae, including alcohols, alkanes, and hydrogen.

48 6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies  

Alcohols In addition to ethanol, it is possible to use algae to produce
other alcohols, such as methanol and butanol, using a
Algae, such as Chlorella vulgaris and Chlamydomonas
similar process technology, although the recovery of
perigranulata, are capable of producing ethanol and other
heavier alcohols may prove problematic and will need
alcohols through heterotrophic fermentation of starch
further R&D. The larger alcohols have energy densities
(Hon-Nami, 2006; Hirayama et al., 1998). This can be
closer to that of gasoline but are not typically produced
accomplished through the production and storage of
at the yields that are necessary for commercial viability.
starch via photosynthesis within the algae, or by feeding
sugar to the algae directly, and subsequent anaerobic
fermentation of these carbon sources to produce ethanol Alkanes
under dark conditions. If these alcohols can be extracted In addition to alcohols, alkanes may be produced directly
directly from the algal culture media, the process by heterotrophic metabolic pathways using algae. Rather
may be drastically less capital- and energy-intensive than growing algae in ponds or enclosed in plastic
than competitive algal biofuel processes. The process tubes that utilize sunlight and photosynthesis, algae can
would essentially eliminate the need to separate the be grown inside closed reactors without sunlight. The
biomass from water and extract and process the oils. algae are fed sugars, the cheap availability of which
is a key consideration for cost-effective production of
This process typically consists of closed photobioreactors biofuels; these sugars are themselves available from
utilizing sea-water with metabolically enhanced renewable feedstocks such as lignocellulosic biomass,
cyanobacteria that produce ethanol or other alcohols while in a pressure and heat-controlled environment. This
being resistant to high temperature, high salinity, and process can use different strains of algae to produce
high ethanol levels—previous barriers to commercial- different types of alkanes; some algae produce a mix of
scale volumes (Hirano et al., 1997). There have been hydrocarbons similar to light crude petroleum. These
reports of preliminary engineered systems, consisting of alkanes can theoretically be secreted and recovered
tubular photobioreactors (Hirano et al., 1997). One key directly without the need for dewatering and extraction,
aspect of the system is that a source of cheap carbon, such but more often are associated with the algae and thus must
as a power plant, is typically used to supply CO2 to the be recovered through dewatering and extraction. With
bioreactors to accelerate the algae growth. An example further processing, a wide variety of fuels can be made.
of this process technology links sugar production to The process of growing the algae heterotrophically may
algal photosynthesis. There are claims that this process present some advantages over typical photoautotrophic-
may consume more than 90% of the system’s CO2 based technologies. First, keeping the algae “in the dark”
through photosynthesis, wherein a portion of the carbon causes them to produce more alkanes than they do in the
in these sugars is converted into ethanol. The ethanol presence of sunlight. While their photosynthetic processes
is secreted into the culture media and is collected in are suppressed, other metabolic processes that convert
the headspace of the reactor, purified, and stored. sugar into alkanes can become active. Second, some have
shown the growth rate of the algae to be much higher
This technology is estimated to yield 4,000 - 6,000 gallons than traditional methods (Xu et al., 2006). This is possible
per acre per year, with potential increases up to 10,000 because instead of getting energy for growth from sunlight,
gallons per acre per year within the next 3 to 4 years the algae get concentrated energy from the sugars fed into
with significant R&D. It is theoretically estimated that the process. These higher cell concentrations reduce the
one ton of CO2 is converted into approximately 60 - 70 amount of infrastructure needed to grow the algae, and
gallons of ethanol with this technology. With such yields, enable more efficient dewatering if is actually required.
the price of captured CO2 becomes significant, and may
require a price less than or equal to $10 per ton to remain Using algae to convert cellulosic materials, such as
cost-competitive. Further breakthroughs that enable more switchgrass or wood chips, to oil may have an advantage
efficient production systems and the development of new over many other microorganisms under development
process technologies may be critical in terms of long-term for advanced biofuel production. When lignocellulosic
commercial viability. Scaling of these systems to large- biomass is pretreated to allow for enzymatic hydrolysis
scale commercial biorefineries will also require significant for production of sugars, many toxic byproducts are
advances in process engineering and systems engineering. released including acetate, furans, and lignin monomers.
Metabolic pathway engineering within these algae, enabled In most other processes, these toxic compounds can
by metabolic flux analysis and modern genomics tools, may add process costs by requiring additional conditioning
further help in producing a commercially viable organism.

6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   49

and significant dehydration crops. with hydrogen production by accumulation of a proton reaction times of the order of seconds to minutes. biohydrogen) substance by heating. 2003). and the added benefit of being fuels. Polysaccharides. and detailed side-by-side comparison was found in 2003). gasification. although the scientific literature. gradient. laminarin.. The thermochemical treatment of indirect biophotolysis.2 Processing of Whole Algae units and has no fiber tissue to deal with. competitive inhibition of photosynthetic hydrogen production by CO2. 2007). This is one area where algae have a major advantage over other biomass sources because it exists fundamentally in small 6. Algae may prove to be more technologies that are capable of processing whole resistant to these compounds and sugar conversion. Brazil. where finely on economic considerations. too low for conversion to biodiesel. and moderate temperatures (Huber et al. including direct biophotolysis. algae: pyrolysis. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   .e. the algae.1). with some hydrotreating and not only on research advances. Miao and Wu. Although synthetic diesel photosynthetic activity.. produce a suitable feedstock for generating efficiency through genetically engineered algae and/or the standard diesel fuel... in that it is extremely fast. These current time (Bridgwater. Even with the increased methods benefit from reduced costs associated with interest in converting biomass into liquid transportation the extraction process. or other biomass. at least some level of dewatering is still required. and supercritical processing (Exhibit 6. but algae. and the ground feedstock is quickly heated to 350 . It appears that pyrolysis will concentrations approaching 20% are reported in some not be cost-competitive over the short-term unless an species (Chu et al. Liquid product yield tends to favor short residence times. products. There are several reports on the pyrolysis of algae in the scientific literature (Demirbas. especially amenable to processing a diverse range of algae. 2008). higher efficiency can be achieved development of advanced photobioreactors. such as mannitol.steps or the concentration of biomass hydrolysate There are four major categories of conversion in the conversion step. fast There are several challenges that remain before heating rates. 2004).e. 2004). Hydrogen The production of hydrogen derived from algae has Pyrolysis received significant attention over several decades. no comprehensive less than 5% of total dry weight (McDermid & Stuercke. McDermid & Stuercke. social acceptance. is a relatively new process (Bridgwater. the whole algae can be processed into fuels bio-oil from pyrolysis is not a commercial product at the instead of first extracting oils and post-processing. improvement in hydrocracking. 50 6. photo-fermentation..500˚C for development of a robust hydrogen infrastructure less than 2 seconds. 2003). i. place in their presence. but also by the so-called “flash pyrolysis” technology. Also. it appears fast pyrolysis to create bio-oil. These include the restriction of photosynthetic conversion methods. represent the main macroalgae biochemical it would be to convert algae into a bio-oil compared feedstocks for conversion to liquid fuels (McHugh. Macroalgae has specifically received some attention as a gasification feedstock and initial work shows that while A significant roadblock in using pyrolysis for algae some key differences exist as compared to terrestrial conversion is moisture content. Pyrolysis is the chemical decomposition of a condensed Biological production of hydrogen (i. anaerobic digestion. feedstocks must be ground into fine particles. The bio-oil has an advantage that it can enter directly The future of biological hydrogen production depends into the refinery stream and. efficiently. typical biomass throughout the country. depending on the reaction parameters. a electrons by oxygen in algal hydrogen production. to other biomass sources due to uncertainties in the Lipid content of a variety of macroalgal species is typically ability to dehydrate the feedstock. For flash pyrolysis. can result in a wide range of and dark-fermentation (see Chapter 2). Pyrolysis has one major advantage over other technology. 2006. Several pilot plants for fast pyrolysis of biomass have been built in the In addition to the direct production of biofuels from past years in Germany. and competitive drainage of fuel cannot yet be produced directly by pyrolysis of algae. It is unclear exactly how much more difficult and fucoidin. though from algae. degradable alternative liquid called bio-oil can be produced. requirement for Pyrolysis is being investigated for producing fuel from bicarbonate binding at photosystem II (PSII) for efficient biomass sources other than algae. certain species are suitable for gasification (Ross et must be performed upstream for the process to work al. biological hydrogen production can be considered a viable 2006). and the United States. It does not involve reactions with technologies provide a wide range of approaches to oxygen or any other reagents but can frequently take generate hydrogen. 2003.

. Yung et al. primarily that only incremental improvements will occur and a through Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) or mixed breakthrough in conversion efficiency appears unlikely.. so the bio-oil may be more investment required..1 Schematic of the potential conversion routes for whole algae into biofuels Algae Anaerobic Supercritical Pyrolysis Gasification Digestion Fluids SynGas Liquid or Fischer Higher Alcohol Vapor Fuel Tropsch Synthesis Catalytic Catalytic Upgrading Upgrading Transportation Liquid MeOH Biogas Fuels . Another area of interest is the thermochemical infrastructure. research is needed on the catalytic conversion possibility to integrate an algal feedstock into an existing of the resulting algal bio-oils. Srinivas et al. 2006).. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   51 . there are also significant gaps in the information available about the specifications for Conversion of bio-syngas has several advantages over other converting algal bio-oil and the resulting products. it may have a different range relatively mature (Phillips. 2007. Additionally. address the issue of availability easily transported throughout the upgrading process.inexpensive dewatering or extraction process is also Gasification developed. alcohol synthesis of the resulting syngas. 2007. Balat. CO2. First and foremost. 1994). since pyrolysis is already a Gasification of the algal biomass may provide an extremely relatively mature process technology. Exhibit 6. liquid fuels through a water-gas shift and CO hydrogenation (Okabe et al. the gasification of algae to these biofuels would be (Zhang et al. making detailed molecular composition of the resulting bio-oils. The methods. FTS is also a relatively demonstrated that the bio-oil produced by pyrolysis mature technology where the syngas components (CO. the process more flexible. 6. H2. it is expected flexible way to produce different liquid fuels. and it of compounds and compositions depending on the is reasonable to expect that once water content is adjusted type of algae and upstream processing conditions for. 2004). Unfortunately. it is possible to create a wide optimal residence time and temperature to produce different variety of fuels with acceptable and known properties. of algae can be tailored by carefully controlling the H2O. The synthesis While algal bio-oil may be similar to bio-oil from of mixed alcohols using gasification of lignocellulose is other biomass sources. and impurities) are cleaned and upgraded to usable algal growth conditions (Miao and Wu. algal bio-oils from different feedstocks need to be carefully Additionally. Another advantage is the Additionally. It may be possible to feed development of stabilizers for the viscosity of the bio-oil algae into a coal gasification plant to reduce the capital and acid neutralizing agents.Liquid or Hydrogen Gas Hydrogen Fuels EtOH. etc. Work also needs to be performed to understand the can be used to produce a number of products. 2009. bio-syngas is a versatile feedstock and it studied. Another research paper comparatively straightforward. 2009).

(Raffelt et al.. The first reactor was a low. A maximum oil yield of 64% using Botryococcus in this process. it is necessary to determine the optimum conditions 52 6. The main product of this liquefaction process is a “bio-crude” • Fluidized-bed gasification and catalytic reforming that typically accounts for 45% wt. Prior work in direct liquefaction of biomass was very A demonstration plant for gasification of wood chips active. 2006). 36 kJ g−1. Neste Oil. with oxygen at high temperature. There are reports subsequent thermal tar cracker (Goudriaan et al.. The tar-rich gas was then passed of algae to date. Liquefaction of Dunaliella tertiolecta built in Finland in a joint venture of the Technical with a moisture content of 78. with the exception of any upstream process steps that may be Direct hydrothermal liquefaction in subcritical water a source of contaminants which will need to be removed (defined as water held in a liquid state above 100oC by prior to reaching the FT catalyst. However.. 2000) that claim the thermal efficiency. Typically. it should be possible to use by algae for use in the gasifier to reduce or eliminate the some of the heat for drying the algae during a harvesting/ need for a tar reformer. This technology is a representation of the natural with FTS is the cost of clean-up and tar reforming. FTS tends to require applying pressure) is a technology that can be employed to production at a very large scale to make the process convert wet algal biomass to a range of liquid fuels (Patil et efficient overall. it would be useful to leverage dewatering process with a regenerative heat exchanger. 2008). algae may not require pretreatment due to their inherent There have also been comparative studies that report the small size. as high as 75%.. 1995). A solvent tar removal demonstration was (Minowa et al. there are still several areas that should be investigated and require R&D.4 wt% produced an oil Research Centre of Finland (VTT). it is difficult to reach such braunii as a feedstock has also been reported. the most significant problem al. algae may have a unique advantage balance.330 mPas and a calorific value of Tar formation can be minimized or avoided via entrained. These technologies harness the high synthesis catalyst and any other catalysts used in the activity of water in subcritical environments that is capable syngas cleanup process and must be removed. and yield of about 37% (organic basis) at 300˚C and 10 MPa Stora Enso. more research in this area is needed through an entrained-flow gasifier where it was reacted before it can become a commercially viable option. of the feedstock on a • Fluidized-bed gasification and solvent tar removal dry ash free basis and has energy content that is comparable • Fluidized-bed gasification and to diesel and can be upgraded further. Germany. While this technology requires sub-millimeter a net energy producer from the overall process energy sized particles. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . and there are a few reports that used algal biomass with catalytic cracking of the tar is currently being as a feedstock.. First. 1995). In the same flow gasification at high temperatures (Hallgren et al. Liquefaction of algae is two successive reactors. considered a promising technological approach but due temperature gasifier that broke down the biomass into to limited information in hydrothermal liquefaction volatiles and solid char. The pilot plant used dioxide (Aresta et al.. 2005). Another approach for tar-free syngas was liquefaction technique was more effective for extraction demonstrated in a pilot plant in Freiberg. The tars cause coking of the shortened time scales.for dedicated biomass plants. of microalgal biodiesel than using the supercritical carbon built by Choren Industries GmbH. Tars geological processes known to be involved in the formation have high molecular weight and can develop during of petroleum-based fossil fuels realized over greatly the gasification process. The oil obtained at a reaction installed in a plant in Moissannes. Additionally. It would be desirable to efficiency through economy of scale. temperature of 340˚C and holding time of 60 min had a viscosity of 150 . France in 2006. ongoing syngas-to-ethanol research using cellulosic. Even though FTS is a mature technology.. The four of decomposing the algal biomass into smaller molecules basic mechanisms to deal with tar-related problems are: of higher energy density or more valuable chemicals. and improve the process for indirect gasification of algae. but certain species of catalyzed by sodium carbonate (Sawayama et al. • Entrained-flow gasification at high temperature defined as the ratio of heating values of bio-crude products and feedstock plus external heat input. comparable to those of fuel oil.. usually requires pretreatment. report it was concluded that liquefaction technique was 1993). Also. 2005). The a small size with other biomass sources and doing so algal biomass was processed by liquefaction at 300˚C. since determine the feasibility of using the oxygen generated FTS is an exothermic process. The key roadblocks to using FTS for algae are thought Liquefaction to be similar to those for coal (Yang et al.

e.. in terms of yield. the typical mode of biofuel production from algae. 2008). have been types of inputs to the conversion technologies must be shown to be very favorable for large-scale deployment. 2007).. level that can be scaled to commercial production. Several studies have been yield similar to that of the anhydrous process in the carried out that demonstrate the potential of this approach. transesterification. in place. $0. In for example.51/gal). The production of biogas from the anaerobic digestion 2008). unprocessed algae and that there is no negative thereby increasing the efficiency of the process. It was found that the processing cost of the proposed Supercritical processing is a recent addition to the portfolio supercritical technology could be near half of that of the of techniques capable of simultaneously extracting actual conventional transesterification methods (i. In the case of combined extraction and transesterification of algae. however. at less than 50˚C. effect of milder process conditions. and this be mitigated through the addition of a transesterification technique has been demonstrated to be extremely powerful conversion process.3 Conversion of Algal Extracts be needed to avoid saponification. 2006). the overall algal biorefinery in the extraction of other components within algae (Mendes. cost. which supercritical process to produce biodiesel from vegetable 6. conversion of vegetable oils. oil extract.g.4 ml/g-d of biogas can be realized using a two- efficiency. and fuel conversion. either whole or its residues in the extract or spent biomass (Demirbas. in particular...26/ and converting oils into biofuels (Demirbas. raw. including drying. and as such. it must be demonstrated that this process can product stability and quality. is to demonstrate are selective. and one that receives scant attention of algae. gal vs. with a conversion cost-effective methodology. 2009). Because decomposition was for situations like integrated wastewater treatment.. 2008. 1987). In the case of catalyst-free supercritical ethanol costs associated with algal biofuels. Additionally. impact due to the presence of other small metabolites. 2008). fundamental and exhaustive understanding of the different at least in the case of vegetable oil processing. The most common type of algal extracts under One economic analysis has been conducted based on a consideration are lipid-based.. triacylglycerides. Additionally. The use of or ethanol is employed as both the oil extraction medium this conversion technology eliminates several of the and the catalyst for transesterification (Warabi et al. lower reaction temperatures. key obstacles that are responsible for the current high 2004). supercritical methanol in the United States (Hanssen et al..e. an obvious and critical link between the type of extraction process used and the product composition. Similar results have been Fernández et al. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   53 . with a methane concentration of 65% (Vergara- al. It is. $0. It also remains to be seen whether the processing of whole algae in this The conversion of extracts derived from algal sources is fashion is superior. If this approach can be modified observed for supercritical methanol processing of vegetable for the use of microalgae. such as Laminaria hyperbore and simultaneous extraction and transesterification of vegetable Laminaria saccharina. There is to the transesterification of the algal oil extracts. and as such may be a process is capable of tolerating water. Although it has been only demonstrated for the of macroalgae. there are no organic solvent applied in the processing of algae. a consequence of temperature and pressure conditions where algae are grown under uncontrolled conditions used in this study. with similar yields and efficiencies at a Extraction is efficient at modest operating temperatures. further study will also 6.Supercritical Processing oils in one step using alcohols (Anitescu et al. Supercritical fluids The clear immediate priority. is an interesting mode of gaseous oils. ensuring maximum particular.. further work should be focused on the using strains not optimized for lipid production. While the occurrence of A recent study indicated that biogas production levels water in the reaction medium appears as a factor in process of 180. This supercritical transesterification approach can also be applied for algal oil extracts. could become cost-competitive with fossil fuels. it may be very effective oils (Hawash et al. it is envisioned as being applicable for the processing biofuel production.. therefore. thus providing high purity and product that these supercritical process technologies can be concentrations. The supercritical extraction process can be coupled with a transesterification reaction scheme to enable a “one Anaerobic Digestion of Whole Algae pot” approach to biofuel production (Anitescu et al. the decomposition of fatty acids is the main stage anaerobic digestion process with different strains factor that limited the attainable ester content (Vieitez et of algae. Vieitez et al. theoretically possible Supercritical fluid extraction of algal oil is far more efficient that if the other upstream algal processing costs could than traditional solvent separation methods. and efficiency. it has been demonstrated that this extraction. a The economics of supercritical transesterification process. 2009). supercritical tolerate the complex compositions that are found with fluids can be used on whole algae without dewatering. 2009). In this process variant.

the reaction soluble bases by liquid acid catalysts such as H2SO4. This technology is relatively mineral acids due to their higher acid strength (L. it has been shown that One recommended research focus would be to further transesterification of algal oil can be achieved with ethanol develop these homogeneous catalysts to tolerate the and sodium ethanolate serving as the catalyst (Zhou & contaminants expected to be present in algal extracts. Boocock. 2008). 2006). In triacylglycerols extracted from algae to FAMEs (fatty order to compensate for this. acid methyl esters). there are other solution and mixing well. 2008). (Ataya et al. Diesel. Xu mature and has been demonstrated to be the “gold et al.2). Recently. HCl is accelerated and requires shorter reaction times.can be converted into biodiesel. have been shown to lower the displacement of an alcohol group from an ester by required temperatures and decrease the reaction times another alcohol (Demirbas. (Exhibit 6. it was can be performed via catalytic or non-catalytic reaction shown that HPA-catalyzed transesterification of vegetable systems using different heating systems that are required oil achieves higher reaction rates than conventional to initiate the reaction. and therefore.. Biodiesel is then separated processing variants that appear promising. When the transesterification reaction reactions (Wahlen et al. Though acid catalysts have these advantages. Higher temperatures and longer reaction The transesterification reaction is employed to convert times are.. 2008). and catalytic processes that can and emulsification. 2008). 2008. Kerosene. heating system that can be used to enhance the kinetics of transesterification involves the use of microwaves (Refaat Another route is found in acid-catalyzed transesterification & El Sheltawy. generally required as a result. The products of these reactions are typically separated by adding ether and salt water to the In addition to alternative catalysts. In addition to the classic base.. biochemical. they are not currently preferred due to their lower activity than the conventional transesterification Chemical Transesterification alkaline catalysts. 2009). which is simply a process of such as H3PW12O40/Nb2O5. Cao et al. 2007).2 Schematic of the various conversion strategies of algal extracts into biofuels Algal Oil Extracts Chemical Enzymatic Catalytic Transesterfication Conversion Cracking Liquid or Biodiesel Vapor Fuel (ME) Catalytic Catalytic Upgrading Upgrading Gasoline. catalyzed methanol approach. 2008). enhancing the product recovery be employed to convert algal extracts. The apparent higher activity of certain standard” in the conversion of vegetable oils into biodiesel HPAs with respect to polyoxometallates of higher (Hossain et al. The replacement of is carried out in the presence of microwaves. therefore. strength resulted in lower pretreatment temperatures.. An alternative from the ether by a vaporizer under a high vacuum.. heteropolyacids (HPA). Olefin Diesel Diesel Aromatics 54 6.. As a or H3PO4 is also considered an attractive alternative as result. Transesterification (Alsalme et al. a drastic reduction in the quantity of co-products the acidic catalysts are less sensitive to the presence of and a short separation time are obtained (Lertsathapornsuk Exhibit 6. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . This section discusses water and free acids. mitigate saponification chemical.

production. Although enzymatic approaches have become converting lipids into a suitable diesel surrogate. have been proven as a viable means of triacylglycerols for biodiesel production (Su and Wei. at a commercial scale and at competitive prices. much R&D is needed in the discovery. to their corresponding esters but have drawbacks such as being energy-intensive. and energy input (Kalva et al. difficulty in removing the glycerol. both types of sites could be solvents to varying degrees to enable cost-effective present and it is not easy to evaluate the relative importance biofuel production (Fang et al.. 2008). Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   55 . It is capable of producing these reactions in a variety of estimated that industrial-scale ultrasonic devices can allow environments and on different types of oil feedstocks for the processing of several thousand barrels per day. converting carbohydrates into conventional processes (Svensson and Adlercreutz. Use of biocatalysts cell walls... but (Lopez-Hernandez et al. One potential solution to this is the enable efficient biocatalytic processing. Enzyme immobilization may also play Biochemical (Enzymatic) Conversion a key role in developing an economic method of Chemical processes give high conversion of triacylglycerols biocatalytic transesterification (Yamane et al. 2008). defining biodiesel production addresses these problems and necessary enzyme reactions (cell wall deconstruction offers an environmentally more attractive option to the and autolysin).. Hence the process of transesterification can run inline rather than using the To that end. inexpensive (McNeff et al. and (d) the operational stability of the catalyst is the mixing and heating required to carry out the high. This cavitation provides simultaneously reuse. indicates that the use of this co-solvent mixture in the In addition. 2006). Liao et al. these catalysts still require purification One critical area that needs to be addressed is the solvent and removal from the product stream.. engineering. optimizing specific enzyme activity to (lipases) in transesterification of triacylglycerols for function using heterogeneous feedstocks... The transesterification catalysts presented above are These factors must be addressed before a commercially very strong and relatively mature in the field of biofuel viable biochemical conversion process can be realized. Lewis acid catalysts. and optimization of enzymes that are catalyzed transesterification (Stavarache et al. such as method to enhance the lipase-catalyzed methanolysis of AlCl3 or ZnCl2. time-consuming batch process used in traditional base.. The presence of development of immobilized heterogeneous and/ solvents is sometimes necessary to enhance the solubility or homogeneous catalysts that are very efficient and of the triacylglycerols during the extraction process. Acid and basic catalysts and the enzymes used in the downstream conversion could be classified as Brönsted or Lewis catalysts. This work more mature conversion processes currently available. 2008). catalysts may be used to enhance the enzymatic biodiesel production has several advantages: impact of microwave irradiation (Yuan et al. 2008). and 2008). 1998). In the ultrasonic reactor method. process must be able to function in the presence of these However. In particular. 2008). (a) both the negative effects caused by excessive methanol and co-product glycerol can be eliminated completely. as with other approaches. they have not been demonstrated at large scale mainly due to the relatively high price of lipase and its short operational life caused by the negative Catalytic Cracking effects of excessive methanol and co-product glycerol. 2003). 2005). Bioprospecting for will require further innovation to reach production levels the enzymes in extreme environments may produce sufficient for massive and scalable biofuel production. 2008. ultrasonic waves cause (b) high reaction rates and conversion can be obtained. the reaction mixture to produce and collapse bubbles (c) no catalyst regeneration steps are needed for lipase constantly.et al.. Again. catalyzing nucleic acid hydrolysis.. 2007). Other important issues that need further exploration and require removal of alkaline catalyst from the product are developing enzymes that can lyse the algal and treatment of alkaline wastewater. in many cases.. it has been noted 6. These preliminary results indicate that that a co-solvent mixture may be critical in defining microwave processing may be cost-competitive with the the optimal reaction medium for the lipases. 2007). sugars. Thus significant roadblocks to demonstrating the validity of using an ultrasonic reactor for biodiesel production this approach lies in the conversion of algal oil extracts drastically reduces the reaction time. increasingly attractive. reaction temperatures. one of the most transesterification process (Armenta et al. novel enzymes with desired characteristics that are more suitable for industrial applications (Guncheva et al. which increases and temperature tolerance of the enzymes in order to the overall costs. converting triacylglycerols into fatty acid methyl esters. There have been of the two types of sites in the overall reaction in terms some recent reports of using a solvent engineering of efficiency and cost. Although very effective and relatively economical.

This catalyst is also more active than HTiNbO3. for whale oil. obtained in a fixed-bed reactor at 200˚C and 35 bar. and diesel are generally described as amounts of free fatty acids and water. can play a vital role in achieving high conversion Gasoline. such as tehtrahydrofuran. On the other hand. It is worth noting that the Double-metal cyanide Fe-Zn proved to be promising petroleum industry began by developing a replacement catalysts resulting in active transesterification of oil. were employed in vegetable oil performance specifications than by the sum of specific transesterification. CaO. maximizing the final energy content. and they are better defined by their integer not greater than 7. The catalysts obtained are stable and molecules. Many of the catalysts cracking. demanding additional isomerization steps or high octane blendstocks. In this way. M a niobium atom or a tantalum atom. catalysts derived from the titanium and modification of the components in crude oil to yield compound possessing the general formula ATixMO. hydrophobic (at reaction return to biological feedstocks to keep the pipelines full. Although are stable. in comparison to the homogenous catalyst at lower therefore.240°C). the process pressure is high perspective. and cloud point. Conversion to Renewable Diesel. From a refinery’s At these temperatures. Moreover. straight chain alkanes are poor starting materials for gasoline because they provide low octane numbers. flash point. Other based analog. the ideal conversion process would make use (40 . Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . presented above seem to be good candidates for industrial and catalytic structural isomerization. The fuel products are a which A represents a hydrogen atom or an alkaline metal mixture of components that vary based on input stream atom. One particular concern is the stability and longevity of Various refiners and catalyst developers have already the catalysts in a representative reaction environment. 2009). is largely a process of eliminating oxygen and temperatures than the ones currently used (~220 . The catalysts are active feedstock. using autoignition characteristics (as measured by octane number HTiNbO3 as the catalyst. heterogeneous catalyst that has comparable activity Conversion of biological feedstocks to renewable fuels. a great deal of resources developing additional inputs producing the same yields with lower residence times. the with TiVO4 being the most active (Cozzolino et al. and now it is apparent that it is beginning to These catalysts are Lewis acids. the predominant feedstock for the industry is crude oil. oil industry has begun to cast a wider net and has spent 2006). All of the processes that take place in a modern petroleum refinery can be divided into two categories. 56 6. Typical biological molecules One of the most difficult challenges is finding an ideal have very high oxygen contents as compared to crude oil. As noted in chapter 8. probably due to the “renewable” or “green” if it is derived from a biological hydrophobicity of their surface. gasoline. Fatty acids are well suited to conversion to diesel and jet fuel with few processing steps. in an assortment of end products. There remain significant can be used for the production of typical fuels without fundamental studies and unanswered questions that must disruptive changes in processes or infrastructure. temperatures of about 170˚C). active catalysts during transesterification. separation In another example. and Al2O3. they can be used even with oils containing significant Gasoline. and Jet Fuel efficiencies of up to 98% (Soriano et al. fuels is high energy content which is a function of a near-zero oxygen content. and give high glycerol yield with high activities. initial and final boiling point. catalytic hydrocracking and hydrotreating. reducing the concentration the same performance specifications as the petroleum- of free fatty acids in non-refined oil or in used oil. but have essentially in the esterification reaction. which translates to very costly plant design of those operations already in place: thermal or catalytic and construction requirements. Vanadate metal compounds or cetane number). This process has already provided the renewable jet fuel blends (derived from oils obtained from jatropha and algae) used in recent commercial jet test flights. be completed before these catalysts are fully understood.. such as biomass or plant oil. jet fuel. and x is an and process steps. the process development but must resist poisoning and the feedstock is considered fungible with petroleum and leaching of active components. jet fuel.60 bar).The presence of a co-solvent. A major characteristic of petroleum-derived catalyst examples include MgO.. begun to explore the conversion of vegetable oils and waste animal fats into renewable fuels. such as oil shale and tar sands. A typical diesel must meet a multitude of performance specifications FAME yield of 91% and glycerol yield of 91% were that include volatility. and insoluble.

There will also likely be a high metals (especially magnesium) from chlorophyll. little if any pretreatment function within a certain range of chemical components is required. Catalysts in any recoverable polysaccharides into biofuels.Algal lipids can be processed by hydrothermal treatment 6. once H2 used. The liquid effluent and nitrogen heteroatoms) without becoming poisoned. and for recycle to the culture. and reduce double bonds to yield technology that derives benefit from every potential hydrocarbons. contaminants to arrive at the most cost-effective process. 6.4 Processing of Algal (basically. metals. contains soluble nitrogen from the original algal proteins. as well as the amount of are amenable to anaerobic digestion. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   57 . It will amount of polysaccharides and other oligosaccharides be necessary to optimize both the level of purification of present in the algal remnants that are well suited for algal lipid as well as the tolerance of the catalyst for the traditional fermentation into ethanol and other biofuels. In addition. current use have been optimized for existing petroleum feedstocks and have the appropriate specificity and activity Anaerobic digestion can be effectively used as a means to carry out the expected reactions in a cost-effective of producing biogas from algae and algal remnants after manner. nitrogen from extracted proteins. this process will convert the carboxylic Remnants after Extraction acid moiety to a mixture of water. conversion of algal feedstock into fuel. carbon dioxide. 1979). or One other critical aspect in developing a conversion carbon monoxide..g. the attack on the oxygen-bearing carbon atoms will minimize organic fractions of the algae remaining after oil extraction the amount of CO and CO2 lost. In particular. Refinery catalysts have also been developed to the algae has been harvested. This includes the anaerobic digestion of algal remnants The primary barrier to utilizing algae oils to make to produce biogas. as well as the fermentation of renewable fuels is catalyst development. The biogas product typically contains 60% found within the petroleum stream (e. a chemical reductive process). It will be desirable to tune catalysts such that the extraction (Ashare and Wilson. and sulfur methane and 40% CO2 by volume. Glycerin can be converted to propane input is the conversion of algal remnants after which can be used for liquefied petroleum gas. Crude algal oil may contain high levels of phosphorous the nitrogen can be recovered in the form of ammonia from phospholipids. Referred to as hydrotreating.

Bridgewater Anthony. Energy.A. Demirbas. P. P. and Barrow. Malaysian Journal of Science.. Oestgaard. (2009). 3rd (1994). Zaher.M. (pp. (2004).. and Environmental Effects. Z. W. Chen. Eloy.) Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis... E. E. and Kambourova. Burja. Analysis of digester design concepts. (2005). Biodiesel from waste cooking oil via base-catalytic and supercritical methanol transesterification. A. Supported vanadium oxide nanoparticles: Effect of preparation method. V. Hirano. A. Ueda.. 88(3). J. F.. 86(14-15). M...A.J. Andersson. Utilization. Energy Sources. D. 933-940. Biomass Convers. Fuel.. Louvain-la-Neuve. Biodiesel production from high acid value waste frying oil catalyzed by superacid heteropolyacid. and Barberio. L. Part A: Recovery.. 31(2). D. Ataya. G.. Thermal Science. 1312-1325). Ding. Aresta. and Ruiz. support and type of precursor on the catalytic performances in the ODH of methanol to formaldehyde. (1979). Chu. M.. Jacobs. 679-685. N. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. (1993)... A. Devillers.References Alsalme. Heteropoly acids as catalysts for liquid- phase esterification and transesterification. Boerefijn. Dibenedetto. M.. Indergaard. A newly isolated organic solvent tolerant staphylococcus saprophyticus M36 produced organic solvent-stable lipase. 22(2). September 10-14. and Zhu.. J. Lv... Oxford.E. M.. Van der Wal. M. Oily products from mosses and algae via pyrolysis. Dube. A.. Lu. Part A: Recovery. 22(2). Di Serio. Wang. (2006). C. Meeting Date 1993.R. A. A. Pap. (2008). Armenta.M. S. Int. 50(4). Martens. Hermans. and Bjerle. Bos. Proceedings of the Progress in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion.. A. 22(2-3). Hanssen. Hallgren. Kralovec. 2006. Kozhevnikova.. 21–50.. Energy-Oxford.. and El Diwani. Guncheva. Norazmi Mohamed. P. 84(11). L.E. S.. and Santacesaria.. (1997). Pedersen. Kenawi.V. (2007).L. 2000.. Acidolysis of tripalmitin with oleic acid catalyzed by a newly isolated thermostable lipase.. K.. 349(1-2). Kamal. (2008). CO2 fixation and ethanol production with microalgal photosynthesis and intracellular anaerobic fermentation. (2008). and Ternan. Y. Hirayama. 8(2). W. High temperature gasification of biomass in an atmospheric entrained flow reactor.. A. and Ascophyllum nodosum and application of end products. Applied Catalysis A: General. M. Z. Fang. Fatty Acid Composition of Some Malaysian Seaweeds. Demirbas. S. G.. Rev. and Xu. Vinatoru. and Ogushi.. Cambridge. M. Biomass. Ashare. (2009). E. M.. Adv. Austria. S. J. Goudriaan. COO-2991-42. Sustainable transportation fuels from biomass materials. Anitescu. W. UK: Blackwell Science.. A.]. X. A. Cozzolino. Radchenkova.. Transesterification of fish oil to produce fatty acid ethyl esters using ultrasonic energy. and Environmental Effects. De Vos. B. 1045-1052. Hawash. F. M. (2006). 21-27. Education. F. 129-132.M. MA (USA). (2003).. Science and Technology. J.. Thermal efficiency of the HTU® process for biomass liquefaction.. Tyrol. O. 83-103. 697-704. 17(1-2). M. A. Symposium..E. E. Variables affecting the induction period during acid-catalyzed transesterification of canola oil to FAME. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . Gaigneaux.. 22(1). R. 923-927. N. G. Bie... 9th Int. Van de Beld. Conf. F.. I. Balat. (2006). 14(1). Current Microbiology. 58 6.F. and Zeevalkink. T.. Energy Sources. Zhiryakova. Utilization. (2008). A. F.. 338-49. Biodiesel fuel from Jatropha oil via non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification. Li.. 1-13. & Wilson.E. Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts Proc.. Utilization of macro-algae for enhanced CO2 fixation and biofuels production: Development of a computing software for an LCA study. Energy and Fuels. Zhai. Y. Sep. S. Wang. X. Energy Fuels.. Baevre. S..(2006). I. Anaerobic digestion of Laminaria spp. J. Cao. A. 510-515. F... (2000). Fuel Processing Technology. A. R. In Gaigneaux E. 163-168. Demirbas. 1679-1693. 28(10).A. Production of biodiesel from algae oils.. E. Liu. In (Ed) Bridgwater. S. H.. G. Energy Conversion and Management. Belgium. F. 101(1). Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. Biomass fast pyrolysis. and Tavlarides. Thermochem. F.. Naber. Integrated technology for supercritical biodiesel production and power cogeneration. (2008).. Y.. & Phang. 53(6). and Jensen. 170-176. O. 1391-1399. Wang. (1987).A. 93-100.. R... and Kozhevnikov. Deshpande.M. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Tesser..V. 137-142.. 17-22. 162. Dynatech R/D Co. M. (Eds. J... [Ed. J. 579-582.. 85(2). (2009).

(2004). C365-C372. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   59 . S. Nowlan.. Mendes. C. 70(6). Chang. V. J. A. and Okakura. 131(1-3). S...T. V. A: General. C. W. K. Synthesis using bio-syngas and CO2.C. Inoue. (2008). and Hill. Stahl.W. 36. F. 15(6).. Physical mechanism of ultrasound-assisted synthesis of biodiesel.. F. Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds.J. and Kunito.L.K. 11(4).S. Fuel... Vinatoru. K. Journal of Biotechnology. Malik. 48(1). Chowdhury. S. Venditti. R. Refaat. Supercritical fluid extraction of active compounds from algae. K. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Journal of Applied Phycology. Y. Kalva.. Time factor in microwave-enhanced biodiesel production. Henrich.C. Tran. M.F. 110(1). 129(1-3). 74. 111(1-2). 1735-1738. (2003). Dote. T.Hirayama. In Martinez.. An overview of aqueous-phase catalytic processes for production of hydrogen and alkanes in a biorefinery. (2006). Phillips.. Applied Catalysis.. Koegel.. 4(3).. J. E.. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Ogi. Minowa. (2008).. R. Ultrasonically driven continuous process for vegetable oil transesterification. B.. C. Catalysis Letters. Y. Maeda.. A. McDermid. L.S. D. M. (2008)..S. (2008). (2008). T. S.. (2006). Q.L. Sawayama. Microwave assisted in continuous biodiesel production from waste frying palm oil and its performance in a 100 kW diesel generator. Biotechnology Letters. Lipase-catalyzed transesterification of medium-chain triacylglycerols and a fully hydrogenated soybean oil. 513-524 McHugh. S. 808-828. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Mahajani. H. 153-164. M.. Oil production from algal cells of dunaliella tertiolecta by direct thermochemical liquefaction. M.. 534-544. and Argyropoulos. A. Journal of Food Science. and Krisnangkura. Okabe. Taylor and Francis. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. J. Lopez-Hernandez. Y. Hirano. Ueda. Aryusuk. (2007).. 66-71. 8887-8897. Technoeconomic analysis of a lignocellulosic biomass indirect gasification process to make ethanol via mixed alcohols synthesis. 85-93. (2007). J. K. Towards sustainable production of biofuels from microalgae.. T. R. 1188-1195. R. Huber. Kishimoto. A. (1998). (2007). Rasmussen. S. 39-48. Y. 279-288.V. A. K. and Naqiuddin. D. A. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. A guide to the seaweed industry. Liao. Application of solvent engineering to optimize lipase-catalyzed 1. 1857-1861. Hossain. A unique feature of hydrogen recovery in endogenous starch-to-alcohol fermentation of the marine microalga. McNeff. Miao. M.T. Boyce. 171-176.. W. Biodiesel synthesis via homogeneous Lewis acid-catalyzed transesterification. M. Catalysis Today. Tsai. Inc.. 46(26). 9(7). McNeff. A continuous catalytic system for biodiesel production. High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides. Pairintra... Soriano.G. K. 6. Ogushi. P. Srinivas. and Liu.-Y.. 88(3). M.Q. T. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Nutraceuticals and Bioactive Compounds (pp. Fuel. and Hoye. (2009). (2003). 250-254.. (Ed.T. N. 14(4). Hon-Nami. Biodiesel fuel production from algae as renewable energy.. A. K.U. Krohn. H. Food and Agriculture Organization. Hon-Nami. B. Garcia. (1995). J. 4(4). 89(12).3-diglyacylcerols by mixture response surface methodology.. B. J. Sivasankar. R.Y. Energy for Sustainable Development...... The BTL2 process of biomass utilization entrained-flow gasification of pyrolyzed biomass slurries. Yokoyama. Ethanol production from CO2 by fermentative microalgae. (2008). 1330-1336.). Yan. (1995). (2003). 560-565.. and Weirich. Nakanishi...L. A. H... and Shieh. and Moholkar. D..E..R. G. Steinhardt. 413-417. V.N. and Bandow.. H. Patil. Fedie. S. 25(21). Jr. and Sanjay M. CO2 fixation and oil production Through microalga. K.. 189-213)... X.. (2007). K. R.Jr. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Raffelt. Chlamydomonas perigranulata. A. Lertsathapornsuk.. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 114(Advances in Chemical Conversions for Mitigating CO2). 119–132. T. A. Stavarache. and Giselroed. 128(1-2). Y. S. D. Gyberg. & Stuercke. 343(1-2). S.. R... and Yokoyama. Murata. & Dumesic. C. Energy Conversion and Management.. (2005). 657-660. S. S. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. and Wu. (2009).. and El Sheltawy. Nurunnabi. 729-731. Fuel Processing Technology.. (2006). Samejima. A. Salleh. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis over Ru catalysts by using syngas derived from woody biomass.R. B..

Journal of Biotechnology. (2008).. Wahlen. H. Vargas. and Saka. Yung. A. Warabi. L.. 23(1). Corazza. N. 548-552.. B. Grompone. Alarcon. Influences of bacterial degradation on gases generated by pyrolysis of heterotrophically yellowing algae. Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Chinese Science Bulletin... 170-175. 23(1). (1994). 10(7). and Doisaki.S. B. Vergara-Fernandez. G.. Corazza. and Zhu. (2008). Vieitez. and Wei. 23(4). Y.A. (1998).. (2005). B.C. Synthesis of biodiesel using microwave absorption catalysts. C. Energy and Fuels. 2018-2022. Effect of temperature on the continuous synthesis of soybean esters under supercritical ethanol... and Boocock. D. B. Wang. Roxana R. Energy and Fuels. (2008).Y.. 22(6). Green Chemistry. Yamane T. Energy and Fuels. 22(4). Borges.. (2008). Zhang. Iwasaki Y. L. N. G. Y. 83(12). (2006). A highly active and stable Fe-Mn catalyst for slurry Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. (2009).... Y. Yang. J. B.. Oliveira... Grompone. Catalysis Today. Improvement in lipase-catalyzed methanolysis of triacylglycerols for biodiesel production using a solvent engineering method.. Q.M. Da Silva. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. Alckmin. M.. (2006). and Fu. P...Svensson. Q. J. Zhou.A. C.. Phase distributions of alcohol. 1007-1013. Shimidzu N. 115(1-3). Oliveira. I. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. R.M. H. Barney. B. F. (2009). J.. I... 1874-1887. 171-179. H. Borges. and Jachmanian. and Li. E. Xu. 60 6. I. 110(11). and Magrini-Bair. Algal Biofuel Conversion Technologies   . and Seefeldt.D. Yu. (2008). I. Vieitez. Multiple intensified performance of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in organic medium. 39(23). G. Da Silva.. W. Synthesis of biodiesel from mixed feedstocks and longer chain alcohols using an acid-catalyzed method. Evaluation of marine algae as a source of biogas in a two-stage anaerobic reactor system. Energy and Fuels. J. Biomass and Bioenergy.Y. Identification of triacylglycerols in the enzymatic transesterification of rapeseed and butter oil. Jablonski. W.R.. Kusdiana. Sheng. X.H. Biodiesel fuel from vegetable oil by various supercritical alcohols. Su.C. (2008)... K. Yang. D. and catalyst in the transesterification of soybean oil. Preparation of mesoporous polyoxometalate-tantalum pentoxide composite catalyst and its application for biodiesel production by esterification and transesterification. Guo. 55(3-4).C. Xiang.. I. Zhong.R.. Y. 746-755. Yuan. (2004). Miao. G. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences... S. X... 106(1-4)... Energy and Fuels. L. and Velasco. J. Yang. M. and Clark. L. A. 558-563. Continuous production of soybean biodiesel in supercritical ethanol-water mixtures. 338-344. 118-125.. G.M.. G. 32(4). F. & Wu. (2008).V. 126.. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. 499-507. glycerol. M. and Jachmanian. Xu. D. 793-801. 4223-4228. 2805-2809. and Adlercreutz. X.A. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. Y.V.. 864(Enzyme Engineering XIV). Wu. Zhang. 1047-1052.. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society.

cosmetics. The topic of polysaccharides. enzymatic or microbial conversion (see Chapter 6).1). Heat. The use of terms such as “high volume” or “high value” This chapter will also address within the context of the can be extremely subjective. the generation of other been discussed (see Chapter 6).. CO2 Products and Complex Fats residues from Substances conversion Special substances: processes pigments. glycerol. As summarized economics of the system. 2004). Moreover. all primary components of algal biomass – carbohydrates.500 x106 lbs/yr. and energy from photosynthesis. aromatic essences. fertilizers and soil conditioners. proteins and a variety of inorganic and complex organic molecules – 7. as a “high value” product biorefinery the possibility of coupling biomass cultivation to a fine chemical producer might be well over several with CO2 mitigation (for carbon credits) and wastewater dollars/lb. these include products for human and animal region according to the cost of the raw material (Willke and nutrition. but considerably under a dollar for a commodity treatment (for nutrient removal) to provide additional producer. valued chemical is defined as one that will cost roughly products. the production a biorefinery for utilization of every component of the of industrial. without invoking competing co. Inorganics Proteins enzymes. Using appropriate technologies. this chapter will focus on co-products must be correspondingly low since their the non-fuel co-products. and they may vary from region to in Exhibit 7. Exhibit 7. This chapter will of algal biomass becomes feasible (Mooibroek et al. For the purposes of the Roadmap.7. corresponding markets in the long term. novel technologies with increased coloring substances. either through Microalgae and Cyanobacteria chemical. hormones.1 An overview of the biorefinery concept Biorefinery Aquaculture Primary Refinery Industry Conversion Carbohydrates Raw biomass. flavors. reductant. a reasonably benefits to the technology. anti-oxidants. is predicted to be generated by the process. generation will inevitably compete for carbon. primarily by the derived from microalgae and cyanobacteria. poly-unsaturated fatty acids. etc. the concept of Under the biorefinery concept (Exhibit 7. fats (oils). The nature of the end products and of the technologies A large number of different commercial products have been to be employed will be determined. dyes. electricity Energy Modified from Kamm and Kamm. $0. Co-products The “guiding truth” is that if biofuel production is conversion of algal biomass to other biofuels has already considered to be the primary goal.2. 2007 7. and nitrogen-containing components enhance the economics of the process. wastewater.1 Commercial Products from can be converted into different products. to be developed to handle the large amount of waste that biodegradable polymers. Vorlop.30 . Indeed. high-value and high-volume chemicals from biomass raw material must be considered as a means to amino acids.$1. Co-products   61 . 2007) address these options and discuss how some of them and must be considered in determining the economics of are better opportunities as they will not readily saturate the process.00/lb. and efficiencies and reduced environmental impacts may have a variety of specialty products such as bioflocculants. and can be produced at a volume of roughly 100 . pharmaceuticals. and stable isotopes for research purposes.

2006). cadmium and derived biofuels. ca. Nitzschia. Chlorella. and is β–carotene from Dunaliella salina.. Anti-Oxidants The market. 1. nascent algal-derived biofuels market: in the long term. animal feed are Spirulina. Nannochloropsis. appearance. Radmer. 2006). etc..10% (wt. GLA by Arthrospira.. have also been produced by microalgae (Borowtizka. and ca. 600 t/yr Nostoc. 280 million US$. horses. fertility. With the possible exception of the existing response. Co-products   . pigs. only DHA has been produced thus Spirulina (Arthospira). microalgal (of biomass. The most prominent aquaculture of mollusks. supplant the fossil fuels market) must be commodities • Animal Feed Additive: Microalgal biomass has also based to meet required volumes at price points acceptable been used with good results (i. and Thalassiosira. 1999). This situation. increasing fuel supplies without drastically increasing price. 2006). significant amounts of lead. 1990.. sold for the health food market. The market size. the resulting non-oil algal improve the economic viability of some algae processes biomass is very likely to be unsuitable for use as an in the short-term. In poultry rations.200 t/yr Dunaliella. is quickly growing. poultry.) can be safely of commercial plants) that are significantly less than those used as a partial replacement for conventional proteins associated with the existing high-value algae-derived (Spoalore et al. 1996. the biofuels markets will involve volumes even dogs and cats. market size for β–carotene is estimated to be greater than Pavlova. which may be added to human food and production at volumes and pricepoints that meet consumer animal feed for their health promoting properties demands or 2) new co-products that are low cost and have (Benemann. estimated Therein lies a major conundrum associated with the to be about 300 million US$. is expected to expand significantly. 2006).5 billion US$. e.. weight gain. gas from coal-fired power plants that will be used co-products of higher value in the marketplace must be to supply carbon dioxide to the cultures will contain pursued in order to offset the costs of production of algal. al. 1986.000 t/yr Chlorella. it is important to note that since the flue massive lipid production dominates.g. Radmer. Yet the existing fossil fuels market is and the aquaculture feeds. 1990. Dunalliella. ca. The production includes ca. DHA by Crypthecodinium • Human Health Food Supplement: The consumption of and Schizochytrium. Phaeodactylum. γ-linolenic acid (GLA). Spolaore et (e. yet in the short term. 1994 and 1996)... Although it is clear that co-products may other toxic elements. Although small. AA has been shown to be Food and Feed synthesized by Porphyridium. and soil fertilizer. which is sold either fish (Benemann.) and scales (sizes and numbers biomass up to a level of 5 . Scenedesmus. better immune to the consumer. protein content and the level of unsaturated fatty value products or co-products from algae. thereby are known to be effective at metal absorption. Malcolm et al. However. Chlorella and Scenesdesmus. The most very large potential markets are developed. the DHA oil market is quickly growing. Pulz and Gross.000 t/yr Spirulina. 2. Nostoc and Aphanizomenon are more cost-effectively produced from non-algal sources (Radmer. GLA from evening primrose oil). and far on a commercial scale by microalgae. 1996). commonly considered PUFAs are arachidonic acid (AA). 500 t/yr Aphanizomenon. is expected to grow in the future. Skeletonema.By definition.) as market for microalgal biomass for animal nutrition and a feed additive for cows. docohexaenoic acid (DHA). The main species used in products. The Dunaliella. arsenic. having presently a retail value of 1. 1990. crustaceans (shrimp). Isochrysis. Phaeodactylum and Nitzschia (Spolaore is currently restricted to only a few species. these existing markets (and associated Spirulina. Both the production plants and distribution channels) are for high. from 300 to 3. 3. The market for microalgal animal feeds.e. currently at ~700 future algal-based biofuels market (designed in part to million US$. and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Chlorella. • Aquaculture: Microalgae are also used as feed in the Benemann. etc. et al.000 US$ per kg (Spolaore et al. and EPA by microalgal biomass as a human health food supplement Nannochloropsis. particularly given the fact that algae transportation fuels below their market price. currently at about 2. not commodity acids determine the nutritional value of microalgal products.. the goal of the industry is to produce animal feed. Most as an extract or as a whole cell powder ranging in price frequently used species are Chaetoceros.g.5 billion A number of anti-oxidants. Tetraselmis. 2004. 62 7. All other PUFAs to a lesser extent. US$. ca. product. is anticipated to continue until 1) a sufficient Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) number of the challenges outlined earlier in the Roadmap for biofuel production have been overcome and associated Microalgae can also be cultured for their high content life cycle costs are reduced to realize sustainable biofuel in PUFAs. However.

Spolarore et al. (2006) ANTI-OXIDANTS Pulz&Gross (2004) Beta-Carotene 1. 2003.. 2006). dyes for food. 1990). 1986. phycoerythrin and phycocyanin. and Exhibit 7. 2006). Benemann.. (2006) Tocopherol CO2 Extract No available information 100-150 Pulz&Gross (2004) COLORING SUBSTANCES Pulz&Gross (2004) Astaxanthin < 300 (biomass) < 150 Spolaore et al.000 2. and as fluorescent reagents in clinical or research give the fish meat a pink color preferred by the consumers laboratories (Spolaore et al. Spolaore et al.. has been successfully used as a salmon feed to cosmetics.. have also been used in the feed of carp and even chicken (Puls and Microalgae-produced coloring agents are used as natural Gross. Co-products   63 . Pulz&Gross (2004) No available information 5.000 soil conditioners Metting&Pyne (1986) 7. (2006) Phycocyanin No available information >10 Pulz&Gross (2004) Phycoerythrin No available information >2 Pulz&Gross (2004) FERTILIZERS/SOIL CONDITIONERS Fertilizers.. a carotenoid produced by Hematococcus Porphyridium.. no current commercial market Spolaore et al. no current commercial market Spolaore et al. (2006) Animal Feed Additive No available information 300 Pulz&Gross (2004) POLY-UNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS (PUFAs) ARA No available information 20 Pulz&Gross (2004) Pulz&Gross (2004) DHA <300 1.. 2006).500 Pulz&Gross (2004) Pulz&Gross (2004) Aquaculture 1. (2006) PUFA Extracts No available information 10 Pulz&Gross (2004) GLA Potential product. Phycobiliproteins.Coloring Agents the related carotenoids lutein and zeaxantin..e. are used as food dyes.. pigments in pluvialis. growth promoters. (Olaizola..500 Spolaore et al. the cyanobacterium Arthrospira and the rhodophyte Astaxanthin. 2004. Astaxanthin.000 700 Spolaore et al. cosmetics.200 >280 Spolaore et al. produced by in animal feed (Borowitzka. and research. (2006) EPA Potential product. or as pigments i.2 Summary of microalgae commercial products market MARKET SIZE SALES VOLUME COMMERCIAL PRODUCT REFERENCE (TONS/YR) (MILLION $US/YR) BIOMASS Health Food 7.

This occurs with natural oils which manufacturers in many cases would prefer if the costs Macroalgae possess high levels of structural were comparable. the only issue is price. pet food. 2003. pharmaceutical.3). Exhibit 7. Borowitzka. 2004). or with replacements such as algal polysaccharides that are extracted for their commercial proteins for distillers dried grains from corn dry grind value (Exhibit 7. Alginate. fuel. mineral composition of depleted soils (Metting et al. macroalgae (i.. the product can be labeled “organic” and thus saleable at a premium. These include acceptable: bioflocculants (Borowitzka. seaweeds) are used as a plant the redox balance favors formation of pyruvate as the end fertilizer and to improve the water-binding capacity and product (Forro.. 1990. Price becomes less of an issue if algae and agar and carrageenen from red algae. 2003) PRODUCT VALUE Human Food (Nori.3 Global value of seaweed products per annum (McHugh.. Furthermore. 1.. Olaizola. Here price is a major 7. 1990). it 2004). but has been achieved for some chemicals and proteins/ 2004).3 Potential Options for the derived from microalgae (Metting and Pyne. aonori. Recovery of Co-products Other Specialty Products Co-products from algal refineries should address one There are a number of specialty products and chemicals of these three criteria to be commercially viable and that can be obtained from microalgae. Wu et al.2 Commercial Products factor. Singh et al. and stable isotopes for material (shutdown economics). Identical to an existing chemical. pharmaceuticals and In this instance. material it replaces and to be competitive typically. Pulz and Gross.. The production bioactive compounds (Burja et al. 1986). They include alginate from brown ethanol processing. pharmaceutical. 2001.5-6 BILLION 64 7. The market for these specialty products is likely to nutritional products. or other product.) $5 billion Algal hydrocolloids Agar (Food ingredient. 2001). Pulz and Gross. 2007. Metting and Pyne. food additive. 1986).. This sets a high bar research (Benemann. Co-products   . fuel or other product. 1994.Fertilizers which occurs in high concentrations in brown seaweeds. etc. Pulz and Gross. kombu. be very small due to their specialized applications. polysaccharides (Benemann. cost of the new product must be equivalent to the 1986.e. 1987). but the source of the material can often provide from Macroalgae some advantage. plant growth regulators could be 7. toothpaste) $240 million Other uses of seaweeds Fertilizers and conditioners $5 million Animal Feed $5 million Macroalgal Biofuels Negligible TOTAL $5. 2005.. Microalgal biomass could in principle serve the same purpose. 1990. biological/microbiological) $132 million Alginate (Textile printing. Identical in functional performance to an existing chemical. cosmetics (Spolaore et al. medical) $213 million Carrageenen (Food additive. wakame. 2006). 2. must be produced at a cost 30% lower than the existing 1986. biopolymers and biodegradable plastics (Philip et al. is considered recalcitrant to ethanol fermentation since Currently. Radmer.

which is significant in terms of reducing the overall cost of liquid biofuels production. which could then be either sold on the new product. one are less related to costs and more to the functional option would be to convert as much of the lipid-extracted performance and potentially enhanced performance of biomass into energy. New material with unique and useful functional production systems. with Potential Use of a much larger fraction of biomass into fuels. the issues enough markets for potential co-products. There are at least five different options for recovering economic value from the lipid-extracted microalgal biomass The most promising energy recovery technology.3 l per gram volatile solids (Huesemann • Option 2 – Recovery of protein from the lipid. Anaerobic digestion of the lipid extracted biomass. such as pyrolysis. as soil fertilizer and conditioner Each option and its associated technologies and future In addition to anaerobic digestion. and because of their large energy inputs (temperature that will likely be generated in future microalgal biofuels and pressure). the open market or used on-site in the various biorefinery operations. However. non-extracted) micro and macroalgal biomass use of residuals as soil amendments has been successfully demonstrated. could have poor or even negative energy balances (Huesemann and Benemann. with use of the residual biomass edu/p2/biodiesel/pdf/algae_salton_sea. Nevertheless.pdf). conversion technologies. as is currently already done for • Option 5 – Recovery/extraction of fuel certain waste water treatment sludges (see http://www. These are: from a practical and economic perspective. thermochemical research needs are discussed below.3. 2009). Residuals as Soil Amendments these technologies are still in the testing and development Given the large amounts of lipid-extracted biomass residues stage. and combustion. 2009). These technologies are able to convert Lipid-Extracted Biomass. and Benemann. lipids only. gasification. In this case. could also be potentially considered for the recovery of energy from the lipid-extracted biomass Option 1. The economic value of the produced extracted biomass for use in food and feed methane is equivalent to about $100 per ton of digested • Option 3 – Recovery and utilization of non-fuel lipids biomass. it may be difficult to identify large performance characteristics. and the glycerol as nutrients for algal cultivation or could be sold as soil from the transesterification of lipids to biodiesel fertilizers and conditioners. Therefore. both (Exhibit 7.. with reported methane yields of about 0. Maximum Energy Recovery from the (see Chapter 6). Co-products   65 . with potential whole (i. is the anaerobic • Option 1 – Maximum energy recovery from digestion of lipid-extracted biomass. Recycle Nitrogen Gases Exhibit 7. The residuals • Option 4 – Recovery and utilization of carbohydrates remaining after anaerobic digestion could either be recycled from lipid-extracted biomass.unh.4).4 Overview of the five Algal Biomass potential options for the recovery and use of co-products Option 1 Extract Lipids Energy for Fuel Burn Residue Ash/ Soil Amendments Option 5 Soil Fertilizer/ Conditioners Dry Residue Processing Proteins as Option 2 Co-Products Food/ Feed Supplement Processing Option 3 Non-Fuel Surfactants/ Bioplastics Lipids Chemical/ Biological Conversion Option 4 Carbohydrates Ethanol/ Butanol/ Glycerol Chemical/ Biological Conversion 7.e.

green solvents and a result. specifically cellulases for microalgal lipids to biodiesel. Furthermore. which can be converted into polypropylene oxide. Finally. glycerol microalgal cellulases could be provided at a cost of less could be converted by certain bacteria to 1. and could be advantageous. might ethanol could be used as biofuel. from the residual biomass could be extracted and used as lubricants.. butanol is a valuable C4 compound of feed. etc. Since the generation of gasoline. However. poultry.. glycerol could be used to potentially very large.g. bioplastics. it is also used in the In addition. aliphatic polyesters. As was pointed out above. biodegradable plastics (Kamm and Kamm. Recovery and Utilization of Non-fuel Lipids has the potential advantage that the resulting nitrogen- It is well known that microalgae can synthesize a variety containing gases (e. fish.ams. would require the use of specially selected or engineered microalgal strains capable of producing these enzymes. Kawaguchi et al. pigs. it may be possible to recover important industrial production of green solvents. acetic. 2007). and lactic) (Huesemann and Benemann. byproduct markets are likely to be overwhelmed. the mineral-rich ash generated by these thermochemical and diesel substitutes will require specific ranges of carbon processes could possibly be used for nutrient recycle or as a chain length. solvents (acetone. the market for animal feed (cattle. propionic. The Glycerol. feeding studies acids could serve as renewable feedstocks for the chemicals indicate that algae cannot be used as a high percentage industry. supplementation with microalgal proteins to hydrogen. Similarly. (Hu et al. Choi. least 10. ammonia and nitrous oxides) could of fatty acids with carbon numbers ranging from C10 to C24. ethanol. 2007). Furthermore.gov/mnreports/sj_gr225. than $0.150 per ton After the extraction of lipids. to separate specific Biomass for Use in Food and Feed lipids present in the algal oil that have utility as chemical Following the extraction of lipids from the microalgal feedstocks for the manufacture of surfactants. Hydrogen and The byproduct material. Furthermore. while butanol and organic make a useful animal feed.20 per gallon ethanol. the projected market for cellulases is 2007. However. a byproduct of the transesterification of market for industrial enzymes.the thermochemical conversion of lipid-extracted biomass Option 3. Recovery of Protein from the Lipid-Extracted It may be worthwhile. Since biomass may contain sufficient levels of carbohydrates that protein is generally the key and often limiting ingredient could be converted through anaerobic dark fermentations in animal feed. polycarbonates and polyurethanes. for chemical synthesis of a variety of products. Option 2. including and interactions with animal digestion. the residual microalgal (http://www. it will be necessary to either separate the soil amendment. and its applications enzymes such as cellulases or other industrial enzymes include the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries from the lipid-extracted biomass.. and as a renewable substitute (Zerlov et al. and the Glycerol from the to approximately 60 million tons per year for distillers dry Transesterification of Lipids to Biodiesel grains plus soluble (DDGS)) (Berger and Good. the individual local markets for animal feed are often not succinate is an intermediate in the production of a variety located adjacent to areas where algae may be produced. due to issues such as taste of the meat or eggs. be recycled into the microalgal culture ponds. Co-products   . 2006). Assuming that (a) (Yazdani and Gonzalez. butyric. human nutrition may organic acids (formic. adhesives. As of industrial surfactants. Recovery and Utilization of Carbohydrates pets) is already very large and growing (estimated to rise from Lipid-Extracted Biomass. thereby depending on the algal species and culturing conditions reducing the expense for nitrogen fertilizers.. Furthermore. i. current levels.. and butanol).e. jet fuel. produced by 2020. and Option 4. biomass for liquid biofuel production. 1995). however.3-propanediol. is the starting material for the production of polyester. epoxies. could also be anaerobically pretreating lignocellulosic feedstocks prior to fermentation fermented to the above mentioned and other end products to fuel ethanol. 1 billion kg. antifreeze. 2009. 2007. detergents. which contains proteins. For example. also benefit from supplementation with microalgal proteins. a food and feed supplement. relative derived ethylene and propylene. succinic. The current price for DDGS ranges from $110 . the polymers that are currently produced from fossil oil- overall size of the animal feed market is small. the protein fraction and specialty products such as urethanes. and (c) at products such as polymers. (b) approximately 100 grams which is used in the formulation of a variety of industrial of cellulase are needed per gallon of ethanol. Lactic and byproduct prices will be greatly depressed versus acid. product into the appropriate range or rearrange the carbon chains through catalytic cracking and catalytic reforming. 2007). 2008). and paint (Yazdani and Gonzalez. is potentially very large.usda. generate electricity directly in biofuel cells (Yildiz and 66 7.. thus butanol could serve to the amount of byproduct that would be produced. Kamm and Kamm. this option (Datta et al.txt). 2008). 2001).5 billion gallons of lignocellulosic ethanol will be solvents.

H. Bonsignore. Hashimoto. Netherlands. Journal of Biosciences Bioengineering.S. Developments in industrial microbiology. Ghirardi. Science Publishers. Borowitzka. Posewitz. K. The Hague.W. Champaign-Urbana. Co-products   67 . Technological and economic potential of poly(lactic acid) and lactic acid derivatives.e.R.A. Datta. (1986). the market for organic fertilizer is large As was the case with Option 3. (2007). Kamm. (2007). (57). it applications (Mooibroek et al.R. Tsai.com/article. i..J. As was mentioned above. 247-256. if desired. Metting.G. with saturated. L. (2001). B.. proteins.C. Crouch. including www. (2008). Zimmerman. (91). (1986). Sommerfeld. Berger. Suppl. carbohydrates. processes. Huesemann. 277-282. P. K. microalgal is possible to revert to the most simple option (Option 5).175-204. M. J. and carbohydrates is not cost-effective. Biofuels from microalgae: Review of products. physiology. J. Abou-Mansour. E. Introduction to Applied Phycology. McHugh. 7. A. Enzyme Microbial Technology. A Report from the Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics. Metting. Miyamoto..M. I. including sugars and complex Production of 1 billion gallons of biodiesel will result in carbohydrates. (31).. Food and Agriculture Organization. Distillers dried grains plus solubles utilization by livestock and poultry in corn-based ethanol in Illinois and the U. Hu. S. with special focus on Dunaliella sp. microalgal metabolites. B.jsp?article_id=377). 3(12). Hirata. A. Choi. Burgess. and Conditioner In case none of the above mentioned four options are It may also be possible to extract microalgal economical. E. Moon. additional capacity from algal lipids may find it Use of the Residual Biomass as Soil Fertilizer exceedingly difficult to find uses. Pyne. The Plant Journal. (2006). (2003). 5. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science (Netherlands). Seibert. M. the recovery and use of energy. The alga dunaliella: biodiversity. W. 9347-9377. (2009).. Algal Biology. J. and potential. Biologically active compounds from microalgae.. 2007). Darzins.Kadirgan. polysaccharides for use as emulsifiers in food and industrial non-fuel lipids. and P.J. Recovery (Extraction) of Fuel Lipids Only. Once again.000 tons of glycerol (http:// tools to improve yields of desired products. SPB Academic Publishing. this option will also require and potentially growing. specifically. Q. (16). J. No. J. M.biodieselmagazine. organic matter as soil fertilizer and conditioners. (1990). D. (2).L. Recent Patents on Biotechnology.. W. Forro. FEMS Microbiological Review. R. Wright. 621-63. (1990). M. and the development of genetic engineering the formation of more than 400. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. J. Banaigs.. Burja. and biotechnology. As the current production levels for biodiesel (700 million gallons in 2008) already has the market for glycerol Option 5. substituting for lignocellulosic materials derived subsequent use of the biomass residues rich in nitrogen and from forestry resources. M. Frank.P. J. A guide to the seaweed industry. University of Illinois. (1987).H. the issue of scale enters in.. B. Benemann. K. Microbiological Sciences. (54). Journal of Industrial Microbiology. Jarvis. Kamm. 221-231. J. Microalgae products and production: An overview. Marine cyanobacteria – A prolific source of natural products. 386-394. R&D efforts as discussed under Chapter 2. (105). D. Finally. (8). Good.R. S. (2008). H2 production from algal biomass by a mixed culture of rhodobium marinum A-501 and lactobacillus amylovorus. 1994). 372-375. these are the development of high throughput technologies for the quantitative characterization of References Benemann. B. Microalgae as sources of fine chemicals. Tetrahedon. carbohydrates could be recycled into pulp and paper which involves the extraction of only fuel lipids and the streams. M. 589-627. L. (2001). Agronomic uses of seaweed and microalgae. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. Kawaguchi H. Microbial degradation of marine biomass. 173-180. van Staden. genomics. Biorefineries – multi product processes. New Hampshire. Glycerol-based biorefinery for fuels and chemicals. M.

N. Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: From the test tube to the marketplace. Kadirgan. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. M. Electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol. M. (2006). (25). Schwarz. T. Accumulation of poly-b-hydroxybutyrate in cyanobacterium synechocystis sp.. Q. J. Assessment of technological options and economical feasibility for cyanophycin biopolymer and high-value amino acid production.S. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. P.Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. O.. Commercial applications of algae: Opportunities and Constraints. B. (2004).H. (76). 73-95. T. (77). Singh. 93-98. G.. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: A path to economic liability for the biofuels industry.V. Oosterhuis. 257-267. Bacterial acetone and butanol production by industrial fermentation in the Soviet Union: Use of hydrolyzed agricultural waste for biorefinery..Mooibroek. 101(2).J. Shen.D. Wu. (2006). 68 7. Industrial bioconversion of renewable resources as an alternative to conventional chemistry. (141). 587-597. A. H. Parker.. Z. Algal diversity and commercial algal products. R. R. Willke. A. 459-466. Berezina.C. BioScience. PCC6803. C. Keshavarz. W. M.H. Yildiz. Steinbüchel.A. Philip. S. U. H. 85-90. Giuseppin. Gross.. Spolaore. W. Roy. Biomolecular Engineering.. 635-648. (1996). K. Joannis-Cassan. 131-142. Sanders. Kate. (6). 723-730. (2007). (2004).. 46(4).Y. Radmer. Bioresource Technology. (18). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. N.J. Yazdani. (71). G. (2003). Commercial applications of microalgae. (2007). (2007). Wu. Vorlop. Velikodvorskaya. Banerjee. Co-products   . Zerlov. 213-219. Isambert. R. B.C. Radmer. F. G. Scott. (2001).. (66). 233-247.. Toonen. O. Journal of Electrochemical Society. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. I. (2005).. Pulz. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Biodegradable polymers with a range of applications. Franssen. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology. E. S. (82). (65). V. Current Opinion Biotechnology. S. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. (1994). (1994). Duran. 87-96. Journal of Applied Phycology. (20). E.F. Gonzalez. 263-270.Y. Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: An overview. Olaizola.

It is conceivable that these “bio-crudes” Lowering costs associated with the delivery of raw will be compatible with current pipeline and tanker biomass. poorly characterized. These have been challenging issues appear to be more compatible with the existing petroleum for lignocellulosic feedstocks (Hess et al. such as cultivation and harvesting. pyrolysis oil. 2009. materials and temperature considerations (e. products – ethanol. fuel intermediates. Each of these different fuels has where the algae production and biorefinery facilities different implications for distributions. which carries infrastructure costs can be lowered in four ways: implications for the producers of algae and selection • Minimizing transport distance between process units. combusting. biogas. and dispensing algal concerning algal biomass. jet-fuel blends from a variety can be expected to influence the economics of algal of oil-rich feedstocks. implications for biodiesel stability (Bondioli et al. and jet fuels are all possible products for energy-inputs and costs. and end-use vehicles).. • Second. fuel intermediates. 1990). blending. Distribution and Utilization  69 . container dimensions. and different fuels from algae are being considered. Efstathiou and Credeur. biodiesel. infrastructure concerns. Although the biofuel product(s) from algae will not require significant distribution system from algal biomass would ideally be energy-dense modifications during or after processing in the refinery.. remain poorly studied: Being intermediate steps in the supply chain. to be compatible for use in select demonstration flights (Buckman and Backs. pH and from algal biomass resources. biofuels. 1986). it is difficult to predict how utilization challenges associated with each of these possible these factors will influence biomass storage and opportunities is discussed. have been shown biofuels as well. biodiesel. rails. hazardous Distribution is complicated by the fact that several materials and associated human health impacts. delivery vehicles. In turn. However. fuels intermediates. 2009) and infrastructure... conforming to existing standards (e. as corrosivity) for trucks. for ideal lipid compositions. and • Third. storage. The optimal Technologies). transport. it is known that the presence feedstock production center to the ultimate consumer of unsaturated fatty acids causes auto-oxidation of are common goals for all biofuels. transporting.g. the stability of the algal biomass under different decision points. higher alcohols. biofuels oils (Miyashita and Takagi. an issue that impacts oleaginous microalgae feedstocks is that the transport and storage mechanisms 8. depending on whether it will be dewatered/ • Optimizing the scale of operations to the parameters densified biomass and/or fuel intermediates that are to stated above. and final fuels biomass.8. 2009).g. and barges is critical discussed in detail in Chapter 6 (Algal Biofuel Conversion to minimizing infrastructure impacts. production. Thus. Distribution and Utilization Distribution and utilization are challenges associated with It is also anticipated that gasoline and diesel range fuels virtually all biofuels. distribution and utilization need to be discussed in the context of earlier • First. dispensing equipment. and completely compatible with the existing liquid transportation fuel infrastructure. the specific distribution and dewatering levels. and the ultimate economics and operations of that natural bacterial communities increase the an integrated algal biofuels refinery. • Maximizing compatibility with existing infrastructure 1995). diesel. and transport scenarios is these logistics through end-use issues influence siting.1 Distribution of algal lipid intermediates have not yet been established. Ethanol. and the quality of the final fuel product. storage tanks. few studies exist that While the demonstration flights mitigate some address outstanding issues of storing. and final fuels from the systems. and hydroreformed biofuels – are being considered harvesting conditions differing in salinity. account for the storage of algae lipids (Hu et al. with some evidence suggesting scalability. It is also known that temperature and storage material have important • Maximizing the substrate energy-density and stability. other distribution aspects pipelining. similar to plant lipids may be possibly taken into pipelines. Some of these fuels are to be sited. within the context of from algal biomass. high capacity. As a variety of fuel rate of algae decomposition (Rieper-Kirchner. renewable transport method(s) should be analyzed and optimized gasoline. Specifically. be transported to the refinery. including algae. In the context of a variety of culturing and syngas. 2008). and bioproducts. 8. In all cases.

Ethanol is another likely fuel from algae. With over Typically, compliance with specifications promulgated by
10 billion gallons per year produced and consumed organizations such as ASTM International ensures that a
domestically, distribution-related issues for ethanol has fuel is fit for purpose (ASTM International, 2009a, 2009b,
been studied for some time, and algal ethanol can benefit 2009c, 2009d, and 2009e). Failure of a fuel to comply with
from these analyses. While not as energy dense as purely even one of the many allowable property ranges within
petroleum-derived fuels, ethanol is an important fuel the prevailing specifications can lead to severe problems
oxygenate that can be used in regular passenger vehicles in the field. Some notable examples included: elastomer-
and special flex-fuel vehicles at up to 10% and 85% gasohol compatibility issues that led to fuel-system leaks when
blends, respectively. However, considerable infrastructure blending of ethanol with gasoline was initiated; cold-
investments need to be made for higher ethanol blends weather performance problems that crippled fleets when
to become even more attractive and widespread. One blending biodiesel with diesel was initiated in Minnesota
issue is that ethanol is not considered a fungible fuel; it in the winter; and prohibiting or limiting the use of the
can pick up excessive water associated with petroleum oxygenated gasoline additive MTBE in 25 states because
products in the pipeline and during storage, which causes it has contaminated drinking-water supplies (McCarthy
a phase separation when blended with gasoline (Wakeley and Tiemann, 2000). In addition to meeting fuel standard
et al., 2008). One possible way to address this is to build specifications, algal biofuels, as with all transportation
dedicated ethanol pipelines; however, at an estimated fuels, must meet Environmental Protection Agency
cost of $1 million/mile of pipeline, this approach is not regulations on combustion engine emissions.
generally considered to be economically viable (Reyold,
2000). Another possibility is to distribute ethanol blends by As is true of any new fuel, it is unlikely that new
rail, barge, and/or trucks. Trucking is currently the primary specifications will be developed for algal fuels in the near
mode to transport ethanol blends at an estimated rate of term (i.e., at least not until significant market penetration
$0.15/ton/kilometer (Morrow et al., 2006). This amount is has occurred); hence, producers of algal fuels should
a static number for low levels of ethanol in the blends (5% strive to meet prevailing petroleum-fuel specifications.
to 15%); as the ethanol content in the blend increases, the Nevertheless, research and technology advancements
transport costs will also increase due to the lower energy may one day yield optimized conversion processes which
density of the fuel. can deliver algae-derived compounds with improved
performance, handling, and environmental characteristics
8.2 Utilization relative to their petroleum-derived hydrocarbon
counterparts. If significant benefits can be demonstrated,
new specifications can be developed (e.g., ASTM D6751
The last remaining hurdle to creating a marketable new
and D7467).
fuel after it has been successfully delivered to the refueling
location is that the fuel must meet regulatory and customer
requirements. As mentioned in Chapter 6, such a fuel is The discussion below is divided into separate sections that
said to be “fit for purpose.” Many physical and chemical deal with algal blendstocks to replace gasoline-boiling-
properties are important in determining whether a fuel is fit range and middle-distillate-range petroleum products,
for purpose; some of these are energy density, oxidative and respectively. These classifications were selected because
biological stability, lubricity, cold-weather performance, the compounds comprising them are largely distinct and
elastomer compatibility, corrosivity, emissions (regulated non-overlapping. Within each of these classifications,
and unregulated), viscosity, distillation curve, ignition hydrocarbon compounds and oxygenated compounds are
quality, flash point, low-temperature heat release, metal treated separately, since their production processes and in-
content, odor/taste thresholds, water tolerance, specific use characteristics are generally different.
heat, latent heat, toxicity, environmental fate, and sulfur
and phosphorus content. Petroleum refiners have shown Algal Blendstocks to Replace
remarkable flexibility in producing fit-for-purpose fuels
Middle-Distillate Petroleum Products
from feedstocks ranging from light crude to heavy crude,
oil shales, tar sands, gasified coal, and chicken fat, and are Petroleum “middle distillates” are typically used to create
thus key stakeholders in reducing the uncertainty about the diesel and jet fuels. The primary algae-derived blendstocks
suitability of algal lipids and carbohydrates as a feedstock that are suitable for use in this product range are biodiesel
for fuel production. (oxygenated molecules) and renewable diesel (hydrocarbon
molecules). The known and anticipated end-use problem
areas for each are briefly surveyed below.

70 8. Distribution and Utilization 

Oxygenates: Biodiesel isomerized (i.e., transformed from straight- to branched-
chain paraffins), renewable diesel and SPK will have
Biodiesel is defined as “mono-alkyl esters of long
cold-weather performance problems comparable to those
chain fatty acids derived from vegetable oils or animal
experienced with biodiesel. Also, as was the case with algal
fats” (ASTM International, 2009b). Biodiesel has been
biodiesel, contaminants and end-product variability are
demonstrated to be a viable fuel for compression-ignition
concerns.
engines, both when used as a blend with petroleum-derived
diesel and when used in its neat form (i.e., 100% esters)
(Graboski and McCormick, 1998). The primary end-use Algal Blendstocks for Alcohol and
issues for plant-derived biodiesel are: lower oxidative Gasoline-Range Petroleum Products
stability than petroleum diesel, higher emissions of nitrogen
oxides (NOx), and cold-weather performance problems While much of the attention paid to algae is focused on
(Knothe, 2007). The oxidative-stability and cold-weather producing lipids and the subsequent conversion of the lipids
performance issues of biodiesel preclude it from use as a to diesel-range blending components (discussed above),
jet fuel. The anticipated issues with algae-derived biodiesel algae are already capable of producing alcohol (ethanol)
are similar, with added potential difficulties including: directly, and there are several other potential gasoline-range
1) contamination of the esters with chlorophyll, metals, products that could be produced by algae-based technology/
toxins, or catalyst poisons (e.g., sulfur and phosphorus) biorefineries. Petroleum products in the alcohols and
from the algal biomass and/or growth medium; 2) undesired gasoline range provide the major volume of fuels used by
performance effects due to different chemical compositions; transportation vehicles and small combustion engines in
and 3) end-product variability. the United States. Ethanol or butanol are the most common
biofuels currently being considered for use in gasoline,
and these alcohols can be produced from fermentation of
Hydrocarbons: Renewable Diesel and starches and other carbohydrates contained in algae.
Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene
The hydrocarbon analog to biodiesel is renewable diesel,
which is a non-oxygenated, paraffinic fuel produced Additionally, the hydro-treating of bio-derived fats or
by hydrotreating bio-derived fats or oils in a refinery oils in a refinery will typically yield a modest amount of
(Aatola et al., 2009). Algal lipids can be used to produce gasoline-boiling-range hydrocarbon molecules. Refiners
renewable diesel or synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK), refer to this material as “hydro-cracked naphtha.” This
a blendstock for jet fuel. These blendstocks do not have naphtha tends to have a very low blending octane and
oxidative-stability problems as severe as those of biodiesel, would normally be “reformed” in a catalytic reformer
and renewable diesel actually tends to decrease engine- within the refinery to increase its blending octane value
out NOx emissions. Nevertheless, unless they are heavily prior to use in a gasoline blend.

8. Distribution and Utilization  71

References
Aatola, H., Larmi, M., Sarjovaara, T., and Mikkonen, S. (2009). Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) as a renewable diesel fuel: Trade-off
between NOx particulate emission and fuel consumption of a heavy duty engine. SAE International Journal of Engines. 1(1), 1251-
1262.
ASTM International. (2009a). Standard specification for diesel fuel oils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available online
at http://www.astm.org/Standards/D975.htm
ASTM International. (2009b). Standard specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. West Conshohocken,
PA: ASTM International. Available online at http://astm.org/Standards/D6751.htm
ASTM International. (2009c). Standard specification for aviation turbine fuels. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available
online at http://astm.org/Standards/D1655.htm
ASTM International. (2009d). Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM
International. Available online at http://www.astm.org./Standards/D4814.htm
ASTM International. (2009e). Standard specification for diesel fuel oil, biodiesel blend (B6 to B20). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM
International. Available online at http://astm.org/Standards/D7467.htm
Bondioli, P., Gasparoli, A., Lanzani, A., Fedeli, E., Veronese, S., and Sala, M. (1995). Storage stability of biodiesel. Journal of the
American Oil Chemists’ Society.72(6), 699-702.
Buckman, R. (2009). Boeing backs biofuels. Retrieved October 26, 2009, from Forbes.com at
http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/17/biofuels-biodiesel-boeing-intelligent-technology-biofuels.html
Efstathiou, J. and Credeur, M.J. (2009). Algae-powered jet proves biofuel in continental test (update 2). Retrieved October, 23, 2009 from
Bloomberg.com at http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=ayiWn9Z4EwIM
Frega, N., Mozzon, M. and Lercker, G. (1999). Effects of free fatty acids on oxidative stability of vegetable oil. Journal of the American
Oil Chemists’ Society. 76(3), 325-329.
Graboski, M.S. and McCormick, R.L. (1998). Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived Fuels in diesel engines. Progress in Energy and
Combustion Science. 24(2), 125-164.
Hess, J., Kenney, K., Wright, C., Perlack, R., and Turhollow, A. (2009). Corn stover availability for biomass conversion: Situation analysis.
Cellulose. 16(4), 599-619.
Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M., Seibert, M., and Darzins, A. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for
biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. The Plant Journal. 54(4), 621-639.
Knothe, G. (2007). Some aspects of biodiesel oxidative stability. Fuel Processing Technology. 88(7), 669-677.
McCarthy, J.E. and Tiemann, M. (2000). MTBE in gasoline: Clean air and drinking water issues. Washington, D.C.: Congressional
Research Service, The Library of Congress. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/fuels/mtbe/crsrtc.pdf
Miyashita, K. and Takagi, T. (1986). Study on the oxidative rate and prooxidant activity of free fatty acids. Journal of the American Oil
Chemists’ Society. 63(10), 1380-1384.
Morrow, W.R., Griffin, W.M., and Matthews, H.S. (2006). Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United
States. Environmental Science & Technology. 40(9), 2877-2886.
Reyold, R. (2000). The current fuel ethanol industry transportation, marketing, distribution and technical considerations. Bremen, IN:
Downstream Alternatives, Inc. Available online at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents/111/4788.pdf
Rieper-Kirchner, M. (1990). Macroalgal decomposition: Laboratory studies with particular regard to microorganisms and meiofauna.
Helgoland Marine Research. 44(3), 397-410.
Wakeley, H.L., Griffin, W.M., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H.S. (2008). Alternative transportation fuels: Distribution infrastructure for
hydrogen and ethanol in Iowa. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 14(3), 262-271.

72 8. Distribution and Utilization 

water. labor. facilities design. and conditions of the particular algae species being cultivated CO2 resources were identified at the time to suggest and the engineered growth systems being developed and that the production of billions of gallons of algal deployed.g. transportation fuel needs and displacing petroleum use.9. capital. sourcing of nutrients from both the input wastewater Additional resources include materials. 1998). needs to be analyzed from a site location..S. Resources and Siting The development and scale-up of algal biofuels 9. both of which influence siting decisions production efficiency. the major resource and environmental parameters that Further. nutrients. 1985. cultivation were conducted during the Aquatic Species and affordability.. energy. microalgae to significantly contribute to meeting U. to couple land-based microalgae biomass production water. 1990.2 provides a simple high-level overview of and macroalgae production approaches (Exhibit 9. concepts are also being proposed. This chapter provides an overview of the issues associated with site location and key resources for various microalgae Exhibit 9. other nutrients. focusing primarily on technical and economic performance without adverse the Southwest and southern tier of the United States environmental impacts. To achieve success regarding both Program (Sheehan et al. Maxwell et al. CO2. The status of algae-based wastewater and conducting operations and maintenance.1). and land Sourcing of suitable organic carbon feedstock. Similarly. Integration with wastewater variety of conditions may be more or less cost-effective treatment can play an additional important role in the for the siting and operation of algal biomass production. availability. This scenario Exhibit 9. off-shore marine environment CO2 sources with algae production are outlined. an in-depth discussion is included on the potential pertain to the algae biofuels production inputs of climate. water. Photoautotrophic Microalgae Approach sustainable water resources. The sustainability and environmental impacts biofuel could be supported if sufficiently high algae of national algae production capacity build-up and productivities could be achieved affordably at scale. CO2. treatment and necessary technical improvements for co-producing algal biofuels are described. For each parameter. and costs.1 Key resource issues for different algae systems ALGAE PRODUCTION APPROACH KEY RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS Climate. and from possible nutrient recycling from residual and other inputs associated with facilities infrastructure algal biomass.. as with any biomass-based technology and industry. Resources and Siting   73 . required Photoautotrophic microalgae production energy inputs. as Different Cultivation Approaches well as from a resource availability and use perspective. and other inputs required for siting and operating industrial Heterotrophic microalgae production bioreactor-based algae production and post-processing to fuels and other co-products Availability of suitable coastal and off-shore marine site loca- Photoautotrophic macroalgae production tions 9. supplemental CO2 supply. a for algal biofuel production.1 Resource Requirements for production. Critical requirements—such as suitable land and climate. operation over time will be important complementary Many of the findings of these earlier assessments still aspects of the siting and resources issues that will also apply today and the potential remains for biofuels need careful consideration and analysis using tools and other co-products derived from photoautotrophic and methodologies discussed later in chapter 10. characteristics. and land. Sufficient land. energy.. land-based photoautotrophic microalgal terms of their geo-location. must also be appropriately matched to the required growth Feinberg et al. Assessments of resource requirements and availability and other nutrients—must be appropriately aligned in for large-scale. the siting and resource factors (e. concentrated CO2. 1990). These parameters with wastewater treatment and industrial sources of are of greatest importance to siting. water. In addition to coastal and inland photoautotrophic the challenges associated with coupling industrial microalgae production. Lansford et al..

Climate CO2 Nutrients Nutrient Recycle Liquid and Gasous Fuels Processing Algal Harvesting and Production Conversion Secondary Products Water Land Climate Water Land Resources and Insolation Location Topograghy Enviromental Temperature Supply/ Demand Use/ Cover Exhibit 9. availability. A supply issues with first. The preferred source of sugars production is based on the use of organic carbon feedstock and other appropriate organic carbon feedstocks for in the form of sugars or other relatively simple organic greatest sustainable scale-up potential and avoidance of compounds instead of photosynthesis. supply logistics. Resources and Siting   . in terms of cultivation and harvesting. The latter throughout the country. beets. lead to the Heterotrophic Microalgae Approach problem of linking biofuel production with competing Heterotrophic microalgae biomass and metabolite food and feed markets.. and lignocellulosic conceptually include the equivalence of land and biomass. DOE.2 to off-shore macroalgae production. The algae are adverse food/feed market impacts would be based on cultivated in the dark in closed industrial bioreactors the use of carbon-rich waste streams and the successful that could potentially be established in many locations deconstruction of lignocellulosic materials. is more Options for siting macroalgae (also known as seaweed akin to agriculture and serves as the point of origin for the or kelp) biomass production include offshore farms. whereas photoautotrophic Photoautotrophic Macroalgae Approach production. an industrial operation with a significant upstream logistics trail associated with the sourcing of the needed biomass- derived input feedstocks. similar conceptual extension holds for the application of Exhibit 9. 2005. thereby sharing many of the same feedstock culture facilities with off-shore areas and structures. 2006a). Use of sugars from cane. This a photosynthetic origin (Exhibit 9.g. cost and availability of space 74 9. biomass feedstock supply for the downstream value chain. and land-based ponds.2 to organic carbon-rich waste streams.2 Key siting and resource Parameters Evaporation Salinity Ownership elements for algae biofuel production Severe Storms Allocation Soils Geology (Adapted from Maxwell et al. Perlack et al. Achieving affordable scale-up and has the greatest feedstock scale-up potential and is being successful commercial expansion using the heterotrophic pursued and reported elsewhere through bioenergy approach relies on the cost-effective availability of organic programs under DOE and Department of Agriculture carbon feedstock—a resource that ultimately links back to (USDA. near-shore coastal farms. 2005).. 1985) can be represented by extension of Exhibit 9.. have different siting and resource input implications and pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass feedstock and thus present synergistic integration opportunities. that is expected to be capable of national scale-up to Heterotrophic production can be characterized as more of over one billion tons annually (Perlack et al. taking into largely associated with the upstream supply of organic consideration factors such as the scale of farms required carbon feedstock derived from commodity crops.. and from the hydrolysis of starch grain crops can. after sufficient scale-up of production and demand. Heterotrophic and includes siting and resource issues that are closely photoautotrophic approaches to microalgae production coupled with the production.and second-generation biofuels. other sugar crops.3). e. The Resource issues for the heterotrophic approach are more merits of each should be carefully evaluated. selected to meet production needs.

and day/night light and temperature cycles.4. both seasonally and annually. key other structures such as windfarms (Buck et al. Closed heterotrophic bioreactor Climate systems are decoupled from the variable ambient Sunlight and Temperature Needs outdoor climate. will most directly metric tonnes for food products). Additional growth conditions for higher biomass density cultures. and severe weather will affect water supply and water quality in open systems. Temperature and availability of (annual global production of about 1. has also been proposed as a way of leveraging other evaporation. From a resource use perspective. the heterotrophic approach can 9.muni WWT & Seperation .other industrial . whereas precipitation. The co-siting of macroalgal farms with microalgae production. precipitation. and favorable regulatory Heterotrophic algal cultures can be one to two orders of framework for coastal and offshore environment use could magnitude higher in biomass density than possible with help enable cultivation at scales to meet production goals. and severe weather.open ponds CO2 . This is done at the expense of Various climate elements affect photoautotrophic algae 9. P.power plants . the level of production affect productivity. Synergistic Project Intergration Opportunities Ligno-Cellulosic Autotrophic CO2 Sourceess Plant Material algae production .ag CAFO Low-Density Algal .. research.2 Resources Overview reduce both water and energy-use intensity in the algae production operation. and competition production. environmental impacts. Resources and Siting   75 . Heterotrophic algae production A major challenge lies in finding and developing new in closed industrial bioreactor systems utilize mature environments and cultivation approaches that will support bioreactor technology that can provide relatively clean production of macroalgae at the larger scales and lower and protected environmental control needed to optimize costs needed to supply the biofuels market.hybrid mix Nutrient-Rich Water. other Water Treatment Deconstruction . 2004) factors include solar radiation. evaporation. are less sensitive to climate variability than open ponds Based on the scale of macroalgae cultivation practices due to the more controlled environment that closed currently being used to meet non-fuel product demand systems can provide. rivers Biomass Harvesting or Other Non-Fresh Waters Lignin Dewatering Extraction & CHP Seperation High-Density Algal Biomass FHarvesting Exhibit 9. K. temperature. Ligno-Cellulosic N.closed PBRs .lake. weather conditions. would need to be greatly expanded for biofuels. technology development.3 High-level Oil Feedstock illustration of heterotrophic Biomass Residue and photoautotrophic Sugars and Other Heterotropic algae approaches to microalgal Organic Carbon production in Fuels biomass and biofuels Feedstock closed bioreactors production Co-Products and nutrients. As illustrated in Exhibit 9. Closed photobioreactors technologies to facilitate the cultivation of macroalgae. open photoautotrophic systems that typically achieve no more than about 1 gram per liter culture density. particularly in the case of land-based with other uses.4 million dry sunlight.

4 Rough scoping assessment of preferred site locations for outdoor algae production a) Regions with annual average climate conditions meeting b) Fossil-fired power plant sources of CO2 within 20 miles of selected criteria: ≥ 2800 hour annual sunshine. including Minnesota. New Mexico. Storm and ocean of these annual average climate criteria with what dynamics affecting waves. For the case of sun hours ≥ 2800. The climate criteria used to narrow down the production at higher latitudes might be possible with Exhibit 9. but suggest was to provide a preliminary high-level assessment preference for lower latitude. and the New England states. having gross qualitative similarity to Exhibit 9. the results are suggestive and consistent with with both open and closed cultivation systems is the the more recent assessment by Pacific Northwest National availability of abundant sunlight. environment provides a buffer that moderates temperature variation. A significant portion Laboratory (PNNL) using higher GIS resolution and of the United States is suitable for algae production more information-rich climate and meteorological data. the ocean or sea ≥ 55°F. This is likely due to Preferred Geographic Regions for Algae Production more moderate annual average temperatures despite lower Exhibit 9. with the higher growth regions northern latitude states. and annual average freeze-free days ≥ 200. Within that context. with the major climate element affecting algal It was recognized from the outset that the correlation growth being the availability of sunlight. and enclosures requiring geographical regions were: annual average cumulative energy input for environmental control. controls. lower elevation sites. and Florida being most promising). identifying preferred regions of the United States for photoautotrophic microalgae production based on Additional factors could conceivably overcome what the application of selected filter criteria on annual might otherwise appear to be uneconomical site and average climate conditions.4 presents some simple GIS-based scoping solar insolation. from the standpoint of having adequate solar radiation Projections of annual average algae biomass production (with parts of Hawaii. would have southern tier states showing greatest productivity potential very low productivity in the winter months. but the availability of adequate sunlight and the from southeast Texas to northwest Florida is attributed suitability of climate and temperature are key siting and to the lower annual average solar insolation available. and marine nutrient might actually be achieved with annual average algae transport cause additional impacts on productivity. annual average daily temperature offshore marine macroalgae production. i.4 algae is technically feasible in many parts of the United (a). the lack of attractiveness of the Gulf Coast region States. from the PNNL study show clear patterns relating climate Texas. productivity in large-scale deployed systems could only be taken as a gross indicator. The goal indicative at this point rather than predictive. whereas PNNL study suggests projected productivities in this region could be relatively high. annual municipal wastewater facilities in the preferred climate average temperature ≥ 55˚ F. resource factors that will determine economic feasibility. Arizona. California. These results should be considered simply conducted by Sandia National Laboratories.4 and the Michigan.high-cost systems. currents. In Exhibit 9.e. Wisconsin. This could fresh water. The more to total biomass growth. Resources and Siting   . resource conditions for algae production.. the availability of non. and ≥ 200 freeze-free days region 76 9. and the availability of concentrated sources include situations where co-location of inland microalgae of CO2. Growth of based on the modeling assumptions used. Equally important for photoautotrophic microalgae growth however.

although evaporative cooling is often viable growing season(s) for the particular strains of algae considered as a means to reduce culture temperature. Florida. discussed later in this section. algal culture can potentially average productivities in more geographically diverse utilize non-fresh water sources having few competing 9. New Mexico. locations for open pond production. Arizona. These weather length of growing season are latitude and elevation. High annual production closely coupled with climate and will increase water for a given species grown photoautotrophically outdoors. The southwestern states (California. Seasonal Considerations are desirable for algae production from the standpoint Various species of microalgae have potential for biofuel of long-term availability and sustainability of water feedstock production and are capable of growing under supply. and currents that can cause the lower elevation regions of the lower latitude states disruption or damage to physical structures and operations. integrated with co-located industries providing synergistic particularly extremes in temperature. Arizona. Such analyses should include assessment of the monthly or Water Requirements seasonal solar radiation and ambient temperature ranges. 1985). both high and low. such as heavy rain and flooding. throughout the seasons. Georgia. respectively. precipitation (more than 40 inches). however. Resources and Siting   77 . cooling in the summer. a critical climate issue for both open and closed less important concern for selecting locations of closed photobioreactor systems is the length of economically photobioreactors. Precipitation affects water availability (both surface it should also establish minimum economically feasible and groundwater) at a given location within a given operational requirement values for heating in the winter watershed region. with more than 60 inches annually. Evaporative however. hail storms. Areas with higher annual average and. It is encouraging that researchers today power for cost-effective environmental control of the algae are not only concerned with finding algae with high cultivation. unlike conditions can also potentially lead to increased annual most terrestrial agriculture. and hurricanes pose serious concerns in the inland regions of the central states. Evaporation. Offshore marine algae insolation and average daily temperatures above the lower production will be subject to severe weather impacts threshold needed for economically viable growth) are in the form of wind. different algal species capable of good productivity in cold season and hot season conditions. This would. Other local to materials and usually demands both the use of higher climate and weather conditions will also have influence. The primary geographical location factors for determining Southwest. Southeast.industrial operations capable of providing excess heat and locations. and New the conventional crop analogy for this is the length of time Mexico) and Hawaii have the highest evaporation rates between the last killing frost in the spring and the first in the United States. killing frost in the fall. the Northwest. opportunities for utilizing waste heat and energy. quality and more costly materials and greater maintenance. dust storms. 240 days or more of adequate solar regions of the United States. the A thorough evaluation of evaporative water loss is conventional crop analog is the greenhouse and the limiting needed to assess water requirements. of available sunlight per day and the daily and seasonal and need to be taken into account when looking at temperature variations.. of Hawaii. For outdoor ponds. tornadoes. The marine environment can also be highly corrosive Texas. and California. would Severe Weather Events and Elements provide greater flexibility and could extend otherwise Severe weather events. for closed reactors. Areas with relatively long growing prospects for algae production in both inland and coastal seasons (for example. Thorough analysis (preferably on a state-by-state basis) with detailed data is needed to assess areas most suitable Water for algae production based on this climate factor. limited periods of commercially viable algae production. Discovery and development of algae species capable of increased General Water Balance and Management Needs productivity under wider ranges of light and temperature One of the major benefits of growing algae is that. Evaporation is a Therefore. Availability and rotation of Evaporative water loss is discussed in a later subsection. is a wide range of temperatures. available for productive cultivation. and parts of Louisiana. but also with analysis for systems that would likely be closed and highly algae that grow well under severe climate conditions. require a more refined biomass productivity and oil content yield. will require that suitable climatic conditions loss can be a critical factor to consider when choosing exist for a major part of the year (Maxwell et al. and overall economics. waves. and coastal areas. and the Southeast. For closed photobioreactors. implications for energy and cost needed to maintain internal temperature sustainable production scale-up. requirements for an open algae growth system. events can contaminate an open system environment or which have major influence on the hours and intensity cause physical damage to both open and closed systems. represented by specific regions of Hawaii.

water-sparse locations. At the national scale. salinity and water chemistry approaching full allocation. Implementing water desalination would impose additional The stress on fresh water supplies in the United States is capital. humidity. Growing demand for limited will change with evaporative water loss.000 Mgal/d) and weather conditions (cloud cover.S. 2002. Saline water (seawater and heterotrophic assessment. or staged as a and from the treatment and reuse of wastewater.. Some salt byproducts may have commercial net fresh water withdrawals that exceed the sustainable value. 2006b. 2008. one-half of the total U. and 37% of all freshwater withdrawals A significant source of water demand with inland algae (Kenny et al. However. or “co. 2009). thereby changing fresh water supplies in support of development and the culture conditions. were for thermoelectric-power generation. withdrawals (201. or 460. from pond but is also becoming a local and regional concern at drainage and replacement. population increase has thus far been offset by increased down of ponds after salinity build-up. Whether or not this is a problem for sustainable billion gallons per day in 1980. climate conditions. 1999. and coal-bed the past 25 years. following the more than doubling of methane wells (Reynolds... and 95% loss in open systems will be the degree of salinity of the of all saline-water withdrawals in 2005. Hutchison et use. with the majority (85%) resources..S. Open algal ponds may from the desalination of saline or brackish water sources have to periodically be drained and re-filled. Also a complicating factor for evaporative water 41% of all freshwater.000 heterotrophic). management. representing etc. hybrid combination). and locally available water over 400 billion gallons per day. or from desalination operations. elevation. natural gas.). solar insolation. Irrigation withdrawals represented 31% of all water al. Water use will also depend on brackish coastal water) withdrawals were about 15% of the type of growth systems used for photoautotrophic the total. can also become an environmental problem for inland where a growing number of counties are experiencing locations. of non-saline make-up water to dilute the salinity build. Total withdrawals since algal industry scale-up will depend on the geographic the mid-1980s have remained relatively flat at slightly location. for irrigation of crops and other lands totaled 128. 2009). This will require periodic blow. 61% of all surface water. 2009). modeling. A rough upper bound estimate of evaporative water loss 78 9.. 1978. In 2005. with water use in upstream organic million gallons per day (Mgal/d). various locations throughout the eastern half of the country. 2002). Kenny et al. ).. or highly adaptive algae that can thrive supplies for non-agricultural use must increasingly come under widely varying conditions. Hightower et al. Climate change is also recognized as a factor that management issues. for future research. Mao. Disposal of high not restricted to the more arid western half of the country. nearly and the site-specific details of climate. is used by microalgae (open vs. are important areas supply and management in the future (USGS. Oroud. Kenny et al. the thermoelectric-power industry in the coastal states whether evaporative cooling is used for closed systems.000 acre-feet carbon feedstock production needing to be part of the per year (Kenny et al. 2008. solar insolation. closed vs. Almost all saline water. and field assessment. salt content effluent or solid byproducts. humidity. which also tend to be in the more arid and higher solar resource regions like the Southwest. water demand over the 30 years prior to that. 1995).. and the future expansion of fresh water salinity build-up. Resources and Siting   . 2004. 2003. to cool electricity-generating equipment.uses. along with associated salt build-up and 2008. withdrawals. Scoping Out Water Requirements for Algae Production Analysis of U. total combined production operations could be for the replacement of water fresh and saline water withdrawals more than doubled continuously lost to evaporation from open cultivation from about 180 billion gallons per day in 1950 to over 400 systems. different dominant algae species and growth conditions. all of cascading sequence of increasingly saline ponds each with which have increasing energy demand implications (DOE. Withdrawals water used for cultivation and the local latitude. Mgal/d and were the second-largest category of water and wind conditions (Al-Shammiri.. depending on the chemistry. Kokya et al. reflects for open pond systems in more arid environments with the fact that fresh water sources in the Untied States are high rates of evaporation. wind. 2006b. Water balance and supply from precipitation (DOE. Many of the nations’ fresh ground water aquifers are under up.000 ambient temperature variations. This will be of greatest impact and concern in being fresh (Hutson et al. 2009). the application of desalination treatment to control increasing stress. Hightower et al.. energy. and operational costs. The relatively flat national water withdrawal trend over produced water” from oil. from both a resource perspective could have major effect on all sectors of water resources and an algal cultivation perspective. 2009). Water Supply and Management Water use and consumption for algae-based biofuels will Total combined fresh and saline water withdrawals in the depend on the cultivation approach (photoautotrophic/ United States as of the year 2005 were estimated at 410. about 95%. USGS. periodic addition conservation and by the increased re-use of wastewater. such as saline and brackish ground water.

and a source of water for treatment and use to meet commercial recycled. the use of non-fresh water sources will need open horizontal pan evaporation data (Farnsworth et to be emphasized in the face of the growing competition al. 2007. and sustainable withdrawal rates Evaporative water loss associated with algae cultivation for these non-fresh ground water resources. southwestern United States. 2008). Along with geological data. systems are implemented. The notional scale-up scenarios and assumptions made are discussed later in this chapter (see Exhibit 9. reclaimed. in gallons of water per gallon of algal biofuel produced. putting less additional demand on evaporative loss than fresh water. depth. There is considerable in the United States are areas of investigation in need untapped potential for utilizing brackish. the estimated capacity. NAS. 1993. discussed be an over-estimate of what can be expected under later in this chapter. analysis for algal biofuels. Resources and Siting   79 . as noted earlier. 2009). resource development. additional water will be used and increasing interest and potential competition for access as consumed. Additional analysis. Saline groundwater resources. both in terms of well in a given location (Maxwell et al.S. and chemical characterization of saline aquifers range of site locations and conditions. Hightower et al. with open systems. The maps of saline groundwater 9.. algal cultivation through harvesting and post-processing particularly deeper aquifers that are largely unregulated into fuels and other products will also be important. Dennehy. which assumed annual quantitative information remains limited on U. 2006b. brackish average algal biomass and oil productivities of nearly and saline groundwater resources in terms of their extent. Unfortunately. monitored. and evaluated under a depth. by state engineers and water authorities. and may well also be saved. 31 g/m2 per day with 50% dry weight oil content. and sustainable withdrawal optimistic productivities are assumed. experimental scale-up scenario study in preparation for the National investigation. The evaporation estimates suggest that water loss on the order of several tens of gallons of water per kilogram The unique ability of many species of algae to grow in of dry weight biomass produced. and of greater investment. and field trials at larger scales of operation are Algae Roadmap Workshop. depending on systems and process specifics. 2009). Open bodies of productively using non-fresh wastewater resources brackish and saline water will usually experience less for renewable fuels. and were based on simply applying fresh water production.7). Extrapolations based on fresh water From a resource use standpoint. Shuttleworth. or several hundreds of non-fresh water over a range of salinities means that.. warrants aquifers located closer to the surface and nearer to the closer attention and assessment to better understand and cultivation site would provide a more cost-effective source refine water resource requirements. Developing and Mapping Water Resources for Algae Production The evaporative loss estimates from the notional scenarios When considering the water resources needed for the provide an indication of the potential magnitude of the future development and expansion of algal biofuel issue. as with other forms of Depth to groundwater is pertinent to the economics of bioenergy (NAS. depth information determines the cost of drilling and operating In summary. Suitable overall input supply needs and consumption. has the potential benefits of actual operating conditions in the field.. Water requirements of water for algae production than deeper sources located information will not be well characterized until larger scale longer distances from the cultivation site. addition to coastal and possible off-shore areas. where brackish or saline groundwater supplies may be The most optimistic production scenario was for the both ample and unused or underutilized. If less water quality and chemistry. held in December 2008. saline. other inland could be a consequence of open system operation parts of the country can be targeted for algae production in the more arid and sunny regions of the country. 2007. Gerbens-Leenes et al. physical and chemical characteristics. reducing eutrophication of natural water bodies. quantity. water utilization for algal biomass and (including energy input requirements for pumping) a downstream production of biofuels.. and to predict can be significantly reduced if closed systems are used. limited fresh water supplies. needed to understand how best to leverage these resources. the effects of their extraction on the environment (Alley. define the spatial distribution. and recycling nutrients. and residential development needs in high growth rate Water must be considered a key element of life cycle water-sparse regions like the Southwest (Clark. The location. 1984) to large area scale-up of algae cultivation (DOE. An improved knowledge base is needed to better evaporative water loss intensities will be greater. 2004). Woolhiser and demands on limited sustainable fresh water supplies et al. integrating algae pan evaporation data will be worst-case and will likely production with wastewater treatment.with open systems was done as part of a hypothetical co-produced water. Evaluation of water use for the overall value chain from 2003. are also of Along the way. 1985). 1982a and 1982b..

5.000 to 2500 MWe of power would each require many tens of thousands of acres of Carbon Dioxide algae production and large volumes of water to provide a similar effective offset of 20% to 30% of the CO2 emitted. recharge rate. In addition. 2009. 2008 and 2009). is not a simple issue. such as from fossil. However. Dennehy. at some large growth system and incident light conditions. aquifers. Produced The degree to which stationary CO2 emissions can water from petroleum. Flue gas. and the matching of CO2 source availability energy input than the output energy displacement value with algal cultivation facilities. As a result. 2004). algae production does possible broader use for carbon capture and storage (CCS) not actually sequester fossil carbon. collect. content. A limited plant can only be effectively used by the algae during amount of this information is available for major the photosynthetically active sunlight hours. Applications fuel-fired power plants. Data on small. 2008) characterization of the CO2 emissions stream (e. The Carbon Capture Opportunity in Algae Production Efficient algae production requires enriched sources of CO2 The distance for pumping flue gas to algae cultivation since the rate of supply from the atmosphere is limited by systems will become a limiting factor that requires diffusion rates through the surface resistance of the water capture and concentration of CO2 from the flue gas for in the cultivation system. The sources shown (NATCARB. and details of reduce fossil fuel consumption. scale of algae production. including Exhibit 9. and coal bed methane be captured and used affordably for algae production wells is another closely related and underutilized water will be limited by the operational logistics and resource that can range in quality from nearly fresh efficiencies. gas abatement credits would come from the substitution The rate of effective CO2 uptake will also vary with of renewable fuels and other co-products that displace or the algae species. Power generation alone (mainly developed by the USGS prior to the mid-1960s (Feth.. Likely Stationary CO2 Emission Sources Major stationary CO2 emission sources that could An inventory of stationary industrial CO2 sources in potentially be used for algae production are shown in the more promising regions of the country. and of CO2 emitted annually in the United States (EPA. information is needed to improve our understanding of this resource in support of algae production siting Barriers to Viable CO2 Capture and Utilization analyses (Dennehy. and the availability of land and water to hyper-saline (Reynolds 2003. detailed analysis is difficult estimated 20% to 30% of the total power plant emissions and often lacking. 2009). a recent analysis suggests that for algae yield. USGS.g. using coal) represents over 40% of the total. and analyze this information..200 acres of algae cultivation resource availability and suitability for economic uses area (Brune et al. The geographical location. 2008b). and quality production to fully utilize the CO2 in the flue gas emitted (chemical components and characteristics) are important from a 50-MWe semi-base load natural-gas-fired power information for assessing non-fresh groundwater aquifer plant would require about 2. 2005. but rather provides in response to climate change (Rubin. it will be necessary to provide a CO2 source that is suitably free of materials potentially toxic to algae. Photoautotrophic algae will only utilize products derived from the algae biomass.. spatial extent. if these aquifers are spread over the greenhouse gas emissions offset will be limited to an large geographic areas. 2002). represent over half of the more than 6 billion metric tons rates and quantities of CO2 produced. or more than 1965. typically output a steady 1. separating CO2 in large industrial plants. However. More detailed and up-to-date 2 billion metric tons per year (EIA. 2008 and 2009). transport. Therefore. and distribution could require more production. description of substances toxic to algal growth) and the local availability and distance to suitable land for algae 80 9. including natural Algae production could provide excellent opportunities for gas treatment plants and ammonia production facilities. The CO2 generated by the power (Shannon. 2009). addition. Any greenhouse CO2 during daylight hours when photosynthesis is active. depth.resources are based on incomplete data that was largely EIA. Campbell carbon capture and reuse in the form of fuels and other et al. potential As an example. 2004. parasitic losses from flue gas the requirements for CO2 supply to enhance algae treatment. sustainability of supply. In represented by the algae biofuels and other co-products. 2006). 2008). would be a good source of CO2. Resources and Siting   . for algae cultivation scale-up within reasonable geographic proximity of stationary sources.. natural gas. biomass growth rate. Larger coal-fired base-load generators that locate. NATCARB. local aquifers may be due to CO2 off-gassing during non-sunlight hours and the available through state agencies and private engineering unavoidable parasitic losses of algae production (Brune companies. identify. including algae production. but a significant effort will still be needed to et al. the utilization of fossil carbon emissions and complement are already in operation today and under consideration for subsurface sequestration. longer distance transport and distribution.

2006 and 2009). lease. Soils. land that would be both can be expected to constrain the extent to which algal suitable and potentially available for siting algae production biofuels production can be affordably scaled up within facilities). and purchase requirements. including pasture. R&D program (e.796 9. much of the land in the West is government owned. is needed for making refined assessments for Land availability is influenced by various physical.0 13 Industrial 141. and political factors. grassland. legal. as illustrated in of a hypothetical algae production scale-up scenario is Exhibit 9.002 Ethanol Plants 41. which means that environmental assessments and/ Exhibit 9. Even slope could well be eliminated from consideration due to at levels of photoautotrophic microalgae biomass and oil the high cost that would be required for site productivity that would stretch the limits of an aggressive preparation and leveling.. such systems on which policies and stakeholders could affect project would require in the range of roughly 800 to 2600 acres of development. several characteristics need to be considered.6..g. Areas with more than 5% with any photosynthesis-based biomass feedstock. as is expected requires relatively flat terrain.3 163 Fertilizer 7. Exhibit (USDA..1 4. any given region unless other factors drive the investment in expanding the nation’s CO2 pipeline infrastructure. lower-value land exists in the United States from stationary industrial point sources (e.9 173 Total 3. and particularly their porosity and permeability Land characteristics. This of land for algae production (i.5 3. algae production siting and CO2 sourcing. social. 2008a) CO2 EMISSIONS CATEGORY NUMBER OF SOURCES (Million Metric Ton/Year) Ag Processing 6. Resources and Siting   81 .3 112 Electricity Generation 2.5) within practical transport distances of suitable algae and relatively barren desert land. Topography would be a limiting factor for these because either open or closed systems will require systems because the installation of large shallow ponds relatively large areas for implementation. 9. For a realistic appraisal production sites in a given geographical region.6 53 Petroleum and Natural 90.702. oil feedstock.g. Physical characteristics. Publicly and privately owned lands are algae culture surface area to produce 10 million gallons of subject to variable use.e.5 Major stationary CO2 sources in the United States (NATCARB.9 665 Other 3.3 140 Cement Plants 86. affect the construction costs and design Factors for Evaluating Land for Algal Production of open systems by virtue of the need for pond lining or Land availability will be important for algae production sealing. For example. as will be discussed further in chapter 10.2 475 Gas Processing Refineries/Chemical 196. could limit the land available for open pond algae farming. such as topography and soil. target annual average biomass production of 30 to 60 g/m2 per day with 30% to 50% Land ownership information provides valuable insights neutral lipid content on a dry weight basis).276.production. Hundreds of millions of acres of relatively low- the limited quantity of CO2 that would likely be available productivity. One outcome economic.

This the light and shade their neighbors farther from the light is significantly lower than the more optimistic target source. the dissipative heat loading Land Availability Constraints can be a benefit in moderating culture temperatures and Land use and land value affect land affordability.60 g/m2 per day. for algae productivity..or environmental impact statements could be required restrict the fraction of incident photon flux that can be as part of the approval process. Land ownership practical upper limits on the biomass productivity. Optimizing light utilization in algae production projections for biofuel feedstock of 30 . lower-value production with algal strains otherwise be effectively captured and used by the algae developed and improved over time to be more suitable and in photosynthesis are instead converted to thermal (heat) productive for biofuel feedstock rather than those used energy in the culture media and surrounding cultivation for today’s high-value algae biomass product markets. the cost of land is during hotter ambient conditions. but currently reflect lower biomass fact that algal cells nearest the illuminated surface absorb productivities in the range of 10 . the potential remains for high algae biomass production relative to more conventional Further. 2009).6 Factors and process steps for evaluating and constraining the available and appropriately suitable land for algae production (Adapted from Maxwell et al. 1985). the amount of biomass growth that can be achieved per unit Relatively large-scale commercial algae production of illuminated surface (Weyer et al. given that large-scale algae biomass production The result will be theoretical and practical upper limits on intended for bioenergy feedstock does not yet exist. By improving productivity under colder ambient conditions. systems includes the challenge of managing dissipative However. reviewing the more recent economic analyses for algae or can lead to overheating and loss of productivity biomass and projected oil production. Resources and Siting   . It must be stressed that “potential” will be constrained by the available energy density algal biomass and bio-oil production projections at in sunlight and the relatively low efficiencies of commercial scale currently remain hypothetical rather photosynthetic processes coupled with other systems losses. system structures. such systems have not been optimized for energy losses that occur when incident photons that cannot higher-volume. as with any form of biomass.. Depending on the algae strain and culture system approach used. can represent and impose political and regulatory Despite the practical upper limits that will naturally exist constraints on land availability (Maxwell et al. Loss mechanisms that often not considered or is relatively small compared to other capital cost. than real. algae productivity crops. (chapter 10).20 g/m2 per day.. 1985 ) 82 9. Contributing to with open ponds for high-value products can serve as a productivity limits per unit of illuminated surface area is the baseline reference. Indian reservations also effectively used to drive photosynthesis ultimately places comprise a significant portion of this land. Land that is highly desirable for development and other set-asides for publically beneficial reasons may Typography Land Ownership Current Land Value Systems Engineering All Physically Politically Land Suitable Affordable Available Available Parcels Land Land Land Land Enviromental Restrictions Current Land Use Legislation Water and and Regualtions Climate Resources Exhibit 9.

A subset of wastewater treatment Inevitable nutrients losses during algae production facilities consist of evaporation facilities. metals.4 Integration with Water conventional wastewater treatment Treatment Facilities • Lower energy intensity than conventional wastewater treatment (a greenhouse gas benefit) Inevitably. nutrients from treatment.not be seen as suitable for algae production. phosphorus. represent potential co-location sites for algae training and experience in large-scale algae operations where nutrient-rich wastewater could be cultivation that would translate to future dedicated used for algae production. which are and processing could be made up with wastewater used to dispose of wastewater or brines. and potassium) be a key issue for achieving affordable and Algae can be useful in the treatment of waters polluted with sustainable scale-up of algae biofuels production. The same applies to land highly suited for higher-value agricultural POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ALGAE PRODUCTION use. offsets algae production costs • Lower capital and O&M costs than 9. some land • Early opportunity to develop large-scale cover characteristics could present excellent opportunities algae production infrastructure for algae farming. archaeological sites. synthetic organic compounds. excess nutrients (e.g. The roles of nutrients. treatment has the following advantages: and other historical sites. 1985). wastewater treatment and recycling • Potential to be integrated with power plant must be incorporated with algae biofuel production. nitrogen. in suitable climates. with the main purpose of by algae and then recycled from the oil extraction residuals biomass production. Two main types of algae production facility are wastewater (municipal and agricultural) would be captured envisioned: dedicated facilities. Land cover categories such as barren and scrubland cover a large portion of the West and may • Development of skilled algae production workforce provide an area free from other food-based agriculture • Potential for nutrient recycling at algae where algae growth systems could be sited (Maxwell et al. dairy and feedlot operations located throughout the • Algae-based wastewater treatment can be United States. On the other hand.. as noted earlier. which can also help supplement and off-set these facility types in the development of an algae the cost of commercial fertilizers for algae production.. The imported wastewater Wastewater Treatment and would be treated as part of the algae production. • Imported wastewater provides nutrients and water to make-up inevitable losses. Examples of this type of constraint include technologies. phosphorus. and wastewater treatment facilities. algae-based parks. monuments. help provide nutrient removal service in the wastewater For large-scale algae biofuel production. and the algae production can algae feedstock production facilities. nutrient recycling. biomass production facilities 1985). for additional rounds of algae production. or other CO2-emitting industry operations The main connections of algae production and • Potential to treat agricultural drainage wastewater treatment are the following: and eutrophic water bodies • Treatment technology is needed to recycle nutrients and water from algae biofuel processing residuals for use in algae production. Sensitive environmental or cultural land constraints Although algae-based wastewater treatment requires will also reduce the overall land availability (Maxwell many times more land area than mechanical treatment et al. 9. organic matter. Nutrient which produce algal biomass as a consequence of the recycling would be needed since wastewater flows in wastewater treatment. Dedicated biomass production the United States are insufficient to support large-scale facilities will also require wastewater treatment and algae production on the basis of a single use of nutrients. this also avoids the perception WITH WASTEWATER TREATMENT and potential conflict of food and feed production versus fuel. wildlife areas. particularly in the eastern half of the deployed in the near-term and provides workforce country. and potassium).. Beyond economics. biofuels industry are discussed in this subsection. The availability and sustainability of water supplies • Wastewater treatment revenue that in the West will also be a key consideration. Supply and cost of nutrients (nitrogen. Recycling Applications • Algae-based wastewater treatment provides a needed Municipal wastewater treatment facilities and agricultural service. Resources and Siting   83 .

High rates of algae production lead to high rates crucial step in wastewater treatment systems. harvesting is a 2002). Ponds for more advanced compounds such as human hormones and antibiotics treatment. 2002). Kohn et al. harming higher organisms.. natural disinfection and remove trace contaminants. As noted above. 2008) is high for biofuel production. Aksu. Algae are similar to in conjunction with wastewater treatment. The treatment goals of these facilities (removal of organic removal of trace contaminants (e. These highly productive systems use shallow reactors. Finally. including wastewater treatment ponds. the is illustrated schematically in Exhibit 9. organic agricultural mechanisms of wastewater treatment by algae.. 1998. 2009). provides a Organic-rich wastewaters usually also contain nutrients. Non- production. and eutrophic waters dissolved oxygen algae release is used by treatment bacteria with low organic content but high nutrient content (e.7. The bioaccumulation of trace contaminants in high-value products (>$100/kg biomass). which is algae that would occur in the receiving waters.g. rivers. the major types to build and to operate than conventional mechanical of wastewaters available for combined algae production treatment facilities. confined animal facilities). The ability agricultural drainage.g. to oxidize waste organic matter (Exhibit 9. need high algae from animal facilities) is an area in need of study. coupled with the tremendous need for expanded and improved wastewater treatment in the United Treatment of Organic Wastewaters for Algae Production States (EPA. needed if algae are to make a substantial contribution to Less well-known are the ability of algal systems to provide national biofuel production. and lakes). dissolved oxygen. The great depths contribute to low algae organic compounds such as phenol and acetonitrile productivity. Borde et al. of chemical addition ($0. Existing interaction of algae and bacteria in wastewater cultures algae-based treatment facilities use relatively deep leads to degradation of a wide variety of synthetic ponds (1-6 m).g. 2003. The cost biomass production.g. recycling of concentrations is useful in wastewater treatment. including nutrient removal. productivities (as does biofuels feedstock production). importation of wastes and/or wastewater will still be Disinfection is promoted via the production of oxygen needed in dedicated algae biomass production facilities radicals in the presence of sunlight. 2009. practical opportunity to install algae production facilities requiring two types of treatment. but high productivity is not crucial to the (Borde et al. if the nutrients and carbon at algae production facilities will be nutrient-rich algae are then also removed from the water. 2008) and throughout the world. and naturally occurring organic catalysts (Sinton et al. endocrine disrupting matter and pathogens only). Woertz et al. municipal and industrial sources) sludge.. Mechanical treatment technologies typically hold either high rate ponds (~30 cm) or algal turf scrubbers the wastewater for less than 12 hours.. As with other algae production systems. and rivers). organic nutrients. Despite a seeming of algae to assimilate dissolved nutrients down to trace abundance of wastewater and waste nutrients. might be prevented to a 84 9. 1988. cost savings. agricultural drainage.. which is the leading water treatment technology and wastewaters mainly contaminated with inorganic used in the United States (Downing et al.. high-productivity algae and water treatment are those contaminated with organic ponds have a total cost that is about 70% less than activated matter and nutrients (e.. For example.and potentially endocrine disrupting compounds (Oswald. whereas pond (~1 cm). This nutrients (e. which will be a benefit as Wastewater Treatment Plants long as the resulting metals concentrations in the algae biomass are not excessive or inhibitive for later use in Integration of algae production with wastewater treatment the processing of fuel and other co-products.. The major plants in that they both produce oxygen and assimilate classes of wastewaters to be treated are municipal. 2002.10 .. autoflocculation) are far less costly. Closed photobioreactors are not emphasized technologies hold the wastewater for at least several days in this wastewater treatment discussion since they are and in an environment similar to many natural receiving likely to be economical only when also producing waters. eventually unlikely when wastewater contaminants are present. Resources and Siting   . but research is needed to improve the reliability of these processes (as Algae-based treatment facilities are typically less expensive discussed in chapter 4). Thus. to make up for nutrient losses (Brune et al. at least in terms of maximizing air flotation units or sedimentation clarifiers..g. The (e.$0. Heavy metals may be removed Algae Production Techniques for by adsorption to algal cells... lakes.17 per m3 treated) or manipulation of culture conditions to promote lipid (Maglion. Maintenance of lipid-rich strains. Muñoz et al. These reactions are also the best-known industrial (e. followed by algae separation in dissolved treatment are aligned. have yet to be demonstrated consistently chemical flocculation processes (bioflocculation and for ponds. the method is chemical addition to achieve coagulation and objectives of biofuel feedstock production and wastewater flocculation. The standard of nutrient removal and wastewater treatment..7)..g. food processing). 2007). 2005). Even with internal recycling.

Exhibit 9.7 Integration of algae production with wastewater treatment for nutrient removal and biomass production: Sun CO2 Reclaimed Algae Water CO2 N P Waste CO2 O2 N Biomass Water P Organics Bacteria a) Basic principles of operation. High Rate Clarifier Clarifier Pond Raw Sewage Treated Effluent Sludge CO2 Digestor Generator kWh Food Algae Biomass Production Inputs Option Liquid Biofuel Products Reclaimed Water Fuels Fertilizer To Fertilizer b) Simplified conceptual system block diagram 9. Resources and Siting   85 .

. dispose of agricultural drainage. their ability to treat high. (GHG) emissions avoidance benefits compared to conventional wastewater treatment technologies. technical and market challenges. research efforts and policy evaluations would likely need to focus on Main Research Needs for Algae both carbon capture and the production of biofuels and Production with Wastewater co-products to overcome barriers (technical. regulatory Successful use of high rate ponds specifically for and economic) for algae facilities that are co-located nutrient removal/recycling requires resolution with electric utilities and other industrial CO2 sources. Findings from rate ponds with CO2 addition has been demonstrated in these interviews and conference calls were integrated California’s Central Valley and elsewhere (Craggs et with the Workshop inputs in developing this section. Resources and Siting   . waters is likely to occur in more rural settings than and additional input sought from managers at major treatment of municipal wastewaters.g. production in order for this type of co-location to be widely commercialized.. 9. The processing of the algal biomass for fuel • Develop algae grazer control strategies and other co-products would presumably destroy and • Develop reliable low-cost algae harvesting neutralize the contaminants. of several issues. CO2 addition or slow atmospheric of discussion included the value proposition. However. These follow-on efforts were coordinated with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). potentially leading electric utilities through later meetings and conference to greater land availability and savings in land costs. As with any evaporation pond technology companies and fuel refiners/distributers with system. Calif. contaminating the algal biomass likely would remain in the waste from biofuel processing. market from decomposition of organic matter would not be drivers.g. Salton Sea. Thus. integration opportunities and challenges.. routes of such contamination should be • Determine the cost savings and greenhouse gas studied and preventative measures developed. Treatment of nutrient-rich National Algal Roadmap Workshop break-out sessions. co-products. al. Lundquist et al. Evaporation ponds are currently used to method for producing biofuels and co-products. The topics wastewaters. 2008. an overriding or other wastewater. desired absorption is essential since inorganic carbon generation outcomes.) are examples of such waters This section includes findings from discussions held at the (Benemann et al. The high rate ponds could create theme was that electric utilities primarily view algae an algal product while performing the service of water cultivation as a means of CO2 capture as opposed to a evaporation.great extend by pond treatment followed by algae • Determine growth model parameters harvesting. Treatment of Inorganic Wastewaters for Algae Production In addition to the ability of algae systems to treat organic-rich wastewaters. and potential algal turf scrubbers without CO2-addition and high opportunities for the federal government. very different business models and goals for algae selenium. CO2-Emitting Industries Agricultural drainage and eutrophic water bodies (e. micro-screening. Mulbry et al. 2002). etc. potentially increasing • Demonstrate recycling of biofuel processing the cost of waste disposal or recycling. constraints significant. chromium) must be carefully evaluated. Treatment of agricultural drainage with on large-scale development. low-organic content wastewaters will expand Cultivation Facilities with the opportunities for algae production systems. 1996. etc. calls. For all biofuel wastes for algae production feedstocks. needed to confirm this. It is important to point out that amongst the numerous barriers to co-location of algal cultivation facilities with High rate ponds might be used as components of industrial CO2 sources identified at the Workshop and evaporation systems needed to dispose of blow-down subsequent discussions with electric utilities. mine drainage.. Furthermore. any heavy metals autoflocculation. as follows: • Large-scale (3-5 acre) demonstration of CO2- enhanced high rate ponds for nutrient removal • Determine CO2 biofixation efficiency 86 9. such as bioflocculation.. and included For algae-based treatment of low-organic content several large municipal electric utilities..5 Co-location of Algal nutrient. but further investigation is techniques. oil field produced electric utilities may need to partner with algae cultivation/ water. 2004). hazards to wildlife from toxic compounds (e.

as sources. Gas-fired the majority of CO2 emissions from stationary baseload generators would not be intermittent. it is also relevant to other CO2-intensive • Potential carbon credit for utilities. fired power plants. 9. carbon sequestration. Resulting costs for • Excess heat or power may be available to provide CO2 will be site-specific and dependent on methods of heating or cooling for improved thermal capture. The emissions from fuel in lieu of permanent sequestration. the CO2 would be emitted to the atmosphere if not captured and sequestered by other means (Rubin. reason is that coal-fired power plants have higher CO2 emissions per unit energy produced than natural gas-fired An important policy question to consider is the value power plants. etc. This higher concentration would affect Coal-fired power plants may be a convenient source of the sizing and operations of algae production facilities— CO2 for algae production. This will industries (e.15%) than natural gas plants (5 . Resources and Siting   87 . The Techno-Economic Assessment section of this report. conditioning. in that the carbon will be require proportionally larger algae production systems re-released to the atmosphere when algal-derived per unit energy produced and higher costs per unit energy fuels are combusted. concentrated • Abundant quantities of concentrated CO2 available sources flue gas from fossil-fuel burning power plants from stationary industrial sources can supplement and other CO2-emitting industrial sources can be low concentration CO2 from the atmosphere. While algae biofuels can be produced. A number of large coal-burning power plants with baseload coal-fired plants. During those times. Also. consumption by algae biofuel and other co-products must be done with approaches that provide a net GHG emissions • Excess wastewater or cooling water may be reduction. plants – overcoming a primary resource challenge for algae cultivation at scale. However. coal-fired plant flue gas typically expected to result in a net reduction of overall GHG has about a factor of two greater CO2 concentration emissions. depending on the type of plant and fuel used. beneficially used in algae production. which typically ranges from about 5% to about 15%. fossil fuel require establishing a U. gas-fired power plants and fuel companies are likely to widely adopt algal that operate as peaking plants rather than base-load cultivation co-located with industrial CO2 sources. many of these facilities have higher CO2 concentrations compared to power plant flue gas. and distance of transport to algae management of algae cultivation systems – this cultivation sites. Thus.g. while providing While the information in this section focuses on fossil.. construction of algae systems at natural models described in more detail in the Systems and gas-fired power plants may be a better investment. cement manufacturing. introduced earlier in Exhibit on the phasing of the intermittency with respect to the 9.5. 2005). generators will have intermittent operation that would A variety of stationary industrial sources of CO2 introduce intermittency in the supply of CO2 for algae are distributed throughout the United States.S. which can transportation fuels may not rigorously be considered bring some advantage in terms of efficiency of capture. beneficial re-use of cooling water and wastewater. shows that fossil-fired power plants represent daylight hours when photosynthesis is active. some absorption and re-use as transportation geothermal power production. fermentation-based industries. would also emit CO2 distributed across the southern tier states provide during periods of darkness when it cannot be utilized by ample sources for algal growth on a large scale. and ALGAE PRODUCTION WITH STATIONARY productivity can be enhanced by supplementing the INDUSTRIAL CO2 SOURCES limited CO2 available from the atmosphere. policy on carbon extraction/refining.The Opportunity in Co-Locating with CO2-Emitting Sources ADVANTAGES OF CO-LOCATION OF Since photoautotropic algae growth requires CO2.). but from an emissions control an aspect that could be incorporated into engineering perspective. using algae to capture the maximum of CO2 absorption by algae in any carbon-credit or amount of CO2 emissions from coal-fired plants would cap and trade framework. the algae through photosynthesis. the process of capturing flue-gas CO2 to make (10 . The growth. and delivery of CO2 from the power plant to of this will need to be addressed before utilities the algae cultivation site. but. Costs are expected to be lower than for will allow developing algal cultivation facilities pure commercially supplied CO2. Co-location of algal cultivation with industrial available. The regulatory implications transport. found often in proximity of power CO2 sources is a promising area for further research. but economic viability under a broader range of geographic and climate must be determined case by case.6%). Offset of fossil fuel conditions on or near a year-round basis. The impact on algae production would depend quantitative breakdown.

). solar resource. the capture and delivery of concentrated CO2 from The test-beds would ideally be located at power plants. The use of flue gas to cultivate algae will involve non-point source emissions at ground level. etc. include: ▪▪ Technology evaluation at larger scales ▪▪ Determination of algae production facility model parameters 88 9. distributors. or in some cases algal to capture CO2 as opposed to producing biofuels and cultivation could be co-located with both stationary co-products. Several areas for research. and facilities that will aid the following: are based upon point-source emissions from high ▪▪ Rapid and consistent engineering design elevations. and be absorbed by algal ponds at a realistic scale climate conditions. sources of concentrated CO2 can potentially provide • Resistance from electric utilities: Electric utilities are ample carbon for photosynthesis-driven algal growth. mechanisms to encourage partnering CO2 sources and nutrient sources such as wastewater between utilities and algae/fuel companies will be treatment facilities and agricultural waste streams. Thus. ▪▪ Techno-economic analyses • Capital costs and operational costs: There exists a ▪▪ Life Cycle Analysis and GHG abatement analysis need to evaluate capital costs and parasitic operational ▪▪ National inventory of potential production sites losses (and costs) for infrastructure and power required ▪▪ Evaluation of economies of scale vs.10 acres). required. as well as policy-development • Land availability: Suitable and affordable vacant land efforts. ethanol plants or other and optimize algae production will not be “free”. P. Their fundamental objective will be brought in from other sources. advantages to capture and deliver industrial CO2 to ponds and of decentralized production considering grow/harvest algae. will be required for commercialization of may not be available adjacent to or near major algal cultivation facilities co-located with industrial power plants CO2 sources and/or wastewater treatment facilities. These costs and losses must be parasitic losses of CO2 transport.30% of a power plant’s greenhouse gas emissions can be offset ▪▪ Development of efficient test-bed facilities by algae biofuel and protein production (Brune et al.. This effort could involve a likely to be possible near the power plant consortium of R&D organizations. the uncertainty may pose a barrier for wide commercial Directions for Research and Development adoption of the technology. CO2 is only at the national level. Specific test-bed R&D absorbed during periods when sunlight is available topics relevant to power and wastewater utilities and photosynthesis is active in the algae. K) supply. The same generally holds true for other cultivation companies. and agricultural • Too much CO2 near plants for realistic absorption: drainage/water body restoration sites that also represent Large power plants release too much CO2 to a range geographical locations. minimized and compared to other approaches for the ▪▪ Evaluation of temperature control (power capture and sequestration or reuse of carbon. • Emissions from ponds are at ground level: Regulatory The following directions have been identified: requirements from power plants and other stationary • Develop computer models of algae production sources are governed by the Clean Air Act. stationary industrial sources as a supplement to enhance wastewater treatment facilities. algal facility. and new business models will be needed to • Unclear regulatory framework for carbon-capture commercialize this approach. to conduct research at the pilot scale (3 . credits: Until there are regulations in place that quantify carbon credits from algal growth facilities. Resources and Siting   . • Establish national algae biomass production test-beds 2009). universities. Although often referred to as a “free” resource. and other participants coordinated plants. stationary industrial sources of CO2 (cement refiners.Barriers to Co-Location of Algae • Maintaining cultivation facilities during utility outages Production with Stationary Industrial and through seasonal changes in algal growth rates: Detailed models will be needed to develop and evaluate CO2 Sources approaches for managing the variable nature of both • Need for nutrient sources: While stationary industrial CO2 emissions and algal growth rates/CO2 uptake. CO2 emitting industry facilities. Current plant cooling and algae pond heating) estimates are that approximately 20% . Also. not in the fuels business and regulated public utility in most cases there will not be a complementary commissions will be constrained in entering the fuel nutrient (N. Therefore nutrients must be production arena. algal technology companies. ethanol plants. etc.

flocculation harvesting. salinity and blowdown • Evaluate policies that would encourage partnering management. and refiners/distributors. storage. and absorption/biofixation efficiency emissions from ponds including plume modeling and algal biomass productivity given seasonal and and regulatory analysis diel variations in photosynthesis and various ▪▪ Effects of various flue gases on algae production water chemistries and co-product quality ▪▪ Control of algal biomass quality (ratios of lipids: ▪▪ Scrubbing of flue gas for NOx. etc. costs. ▪▪ Development of algal strains and their cultivation techniques 9. Resources and Siting   89 . etc. pathogen safety • Develop and train the future algae production/algae ▪▪ Beneficial management of residuals for soil carbon biomass processing workforce at the national test-bed development. Develop university training programs. between public utilities/other industrial CO2 sources ▪▪ Algal biomass handling. crop fertilization. proteins: carbohydrates and C:N:P) ▪▪ Power plant cooling with treated wastewater in ▪▪ Methods of nutrient and water recycling within conjunction with algae production production facilities. SOx. and other sites.▪▪ Flue gas or other industrial source CO2 supply ▪▪ Investigate the safety of ground-level flue gas logistics. and processing and algal cultivation/technology companies prior to fuel extraction.

Van Olst. 95-122.. Environmental Protection Agency. Evaporation rate as a function of water salinity.S.. DC. (2008). (USGS Fact Sheet 075-03). A. 117–125. B. Available online at at: www. US Department of energy Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Enery.eia. Available online at: http://www. DC..orau..J. (2006a). The controlled eutrophication process: Using microalgae for CO2 utilization and agricultural fertilizer recycling. H. R. In Y-S Won & N. Bracco. (DOE/EIA-0484).. S. H.References Aksu. Geological Survey. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2004 Report to Congress.F.com/clientservice/ccsi Clark. Kyoto. Hoskinson. R. Lundquist. In Water Desalination and Reuse Strategies for New Mexico..doe.F. (1998). 1136-1144. G.epa. Dennehy.. I. (2006b). L. J. Available online at: http://genomicsgtl.E. Krause.. Washington.gov/climatechange/emissions/CO2_human.J. (2008). Brune. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Inventory of U. R. Berlin.gov/algae2008/breakouts/dennehy2004. E. B. 293-300. Hatti-Kaul. Available online at: http://www. E. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems® Technology and reverse osmosis. 2002. Campbell. D. W. 150. Green. O. J. Resources and Siting   . Naucler.. S.. K.. Emissions of greenhouse gases report.doe. W.sandia. T.pdf Downing.. and Brune. J..C. (2008). Washginton.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ Energy Information Administration (EIA). 8).S.J. Washington.R. (2002). H. F.html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). April 15).K. and Ruijs.L. and Oswald.C.energy. DC. Tagore.B. Lundquist. and Mattiasson. Department of Energy. W.gov/biofuels/2005workshop/b2blowres63006.eia. Washington. D. Synergistic relationships in algal- bacterial microcosms for the treatment of aromatic pollutants.).B.Y. 135(11). Environmental Protection Agency.. (2009). Cushman. Desalination. (2009. J. T.pdf Department of Energy (DOE). (2003). D. Denver. Farnsworth..J. DC. Thompson. X. M. Washington. and Thompson. 47. (2009).X. B. Erbach. Washington.R. Al-Shammiri. Available online at: http://www. R. Water Science and Technology. Energy demands on water resources: Report to congress on the interdependency of energy and water. (2002). (2004.. Roadmap for agriculture biomass feedstock supply in the United States. T. Ecological Engineering. J. R. Alley. Ocean Coastal Management.C..Y. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute.C..mckinsey. Borde.. and Benemann. September). 45(1)...gov/oiaf/ieo/emissions.htm Craggs. J.J. Desalination of groundwater: Earth Science Perspective. Massingill. October...E. Department of Energy (DOE). Washington. Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Energy..L. McKinesey Climate Change Initiative. Washington. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2007. (2004). Available online at: www. Foust.R. Tam (Eds. Journal of Environmental Engineering. Mean monthly... H. Bioresource Technology.. Adey.. GHGT-6. National perspective on saline aquifers. Zubieta. (February 11. Department of Energy.. Japan. Biosorption of heavy metals by microalgae in batch and continuous systems.. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: A joint research agenda. Easterly. 90 9. and Oswald. A.. Munoz. Albuquerque Journal. B. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Sokhansanj. M. (2003).N. International energy outlook 2009 (chap. Water rush: Deep aquifers sought for metro growth. Benemann. J. Ku. and Wright.. J. (DOE/SC-0095). W. CO: U. 2009). DC. Buck. 6. Carbon capture & storage: Assessing the Economics. Patin. Hess. H. D.abqjournal.R. US Department of Energy. (2002).S. Sheehan. Springer-Verlag. 189-203.R. J.H. U. A controlled stream mesocosm for tertiary treatment of sewage. Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: The prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Guieysse. (DOE/ EIA-0573). Wastewater Treatment with Algae (37-54). DC. (1982).. 149-169. Microalgal biomass for greenhouse gas reductions: Potential for replacement of fossil-fuels and animal feeds. Hettenhaus. Delgado. J.gov/energy-water/docs/121- RptToCongress-EWwEIAcomments-FINAL.. Turhollow. (2002). A. (NOAA Technical Report NWS 34). (2007). Weissman.L. DC. and annual pan evaporation for the United States. Jessup.K.S. W. Available online at: http://www. 86(3). D.pdf. J...com/news/state/aph2orush02-11-09. seasonal. (1996).. Available online at: http://www. J..J. Human-related sources and sinks of carbon dioxide.html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). and Rosenthal.J.

K. M. B.L. Oklahoma Geological Survey. Effects of salinity upon evaporation from pans and shallow lakes near the dead sea. K.CO2 sources were compiled by NATCARB http://www.L. Cambridge University Press. 52. Erbach (2005). CO2 Source Map of US .. U. Golden. A. Kenny. (DOE/GO-102005-2135. (2005). and Einfeld. Hutson. Hightower. (NOAA Technical Report NWS 33) Washington. Feth. (SERI/TR- 215-2484). K.J. R. Solar Energy Research Institute. Kenny. Robert D. and Terry. M. Department of Energy. Available online at: http://pubs.. Washington. National Academy of Sciences. (2003)..natcarb. Meyer. Bioresource Technology..gov/circ/1344/ Kohn..S. S. H. Solar Energy Research Institute. and research requirements. and Oswald. Maxwell.. and the environment. The National Academies Press. 8137-8142. Pate. CO. W. and Hogg. CO. In Borowitzka and Borowitzka (Eds..P. The energy challenge: Commentary. Turhollow.. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. L. Fresno. Muñoz. B. D. and Karpuk. D... F. 51(12). California. Folger. I. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations. Impact of chemistry on sustainable water with its nexus to the economy. N.K. Wright.M. Golden.S.html NATCARB (2008b).R. (1982).S. Department of Agriculture. (1990). Resources and Siting   91 . Feinberg.. J. University of Illinois. Cameron. and Kebede-Westhead. M.usgs.K. R. (2005). Saline aquifer data http://www.. Grandbois. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. E. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Lovelace.. M. M. I. Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: Algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers.. and Maupin M.. (2008).org/Atlas/data_files.J.000 parts per million dissolved solids.A. DC. (OPEN-FILE REPORT 6-2003). CO2 sources for microalgae-based liquid fuel production. (Eds)... Sandia National Laboratories. 4...S. CO. R. T. 2005-2012. Pizarro. N. Hightower. UK.L. Loos. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Fuels from microalgae: Technology status. Hydrological Processes.. S.org/Atlas/data_files. T.L. and Mattiasson. C. S. Ecological Modelling. E. Preliminary map of the conterminous United States showing depth to and quality of shallowest ground water containing more than 1... United States Geological Survey. and Midgley. D. 12). A. (2007). Barber. and Meyer. W. Green.. (USGS Circular 1268). O.C. and Kokya. K. In Metz. B.. Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. Development of Drainage Treatment for the San Joaquin River Water Quality Improvement Project. Shannon. Solar Energy Research Institute.. (1985).. R. Perlack. Lumia. (1995). Resource evaluation and site selection for microalgae production systems. (2008).. D. Washington. energy. Environmental Science & Technology.G. J. Norman. (USGS Circular 1334). Water Science Technology. Photosynthetically oxygenated acetonitrile biodegradation by an algal- bacterial microcosm: A pilot-scale study. Linsey. Proposing a formula for evaporation measurement from salt water resources. and de Coninck. Quinn. 231-240. NM.Y. S.H.J.S. and Nelson. Linsey. W...W. (1978). Rolvering. Reynolds. Kondrad. J. (SERI/SP-231-2550)... Denver. D. Cambridge University Press. (2004). Robin L. K. 4626-4632. 261-265.. Hutchison. (SERI/TP.F. (SAND 2007-1349C). N. Hutson.E. Graham. R. (1988). W. (2004). B. and Donald C...T. (2009). M and Pierce.A. de Connick.). E.C.natcarb. Los Alamos. (2007). Huang. (2006). OK. Center of Advanced Materials for the Purification of Water with Systems. C.K. Davidson.A.S. Lynn L. Thompson.L. NATCARB (2008a). McNeill. 22. T. 41(13). (1986). Overview of energy-water interrdependencies and the emerging energy demands on water resources. Oroud. 285-286. Bryce J.232-3820). Lundquist.S. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Technical summary.G. potential. Hsieh. (1965). CO. Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. J. Oswald. E. and Maupin. Rubin. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005.html Neehan.F.E.B. Association with natural organic matter enhances the sunlight-mediated inactivation of MS2 coliphage by singlet oxygen. 452. Golden. Feinberg. Borglin. S. H. California Department of Water Resources.Farnsworth. McIntosh. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. Produced water and associated issues. 211-235. (Atlas HA-199). R.. C. U. Mulbry. L. M... Modelling the water and salt balance in a shallow lake. 99. Hill.. D. (2007).. (2008). Barber. Stokes. and Peck. ORNL/TM-2005/66). Microalgal Biotechnology (chap. 9. Anthony F. Ahmadzadeh B. C.C... Kokya. E. Guieysse.. Nature. S..

. (2009). (2009.S. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995. Resources and Siting   . National Renewable Energy Laboratory.. M. W. Argonne National Laboratory. H. Evaporation. (Economic Information Bulletin Number 14). M. US Geological Survey. 135(11). CO. D. USDA Economic Research Service..usgs.J. Solley. Golden. (USGS Circular 1331). Wang. (1998). R.gov/Briefing/LandUse/majorlandusechapter. Geological Survey. and Wallace. Produced Water Quality Map of US http://energy.. (Ed). M. 92 9. T. Dunahay. C. K. In Maidment. 2002. 1115-1122. I. Applied Environmental Microbiology. and Nelson.. USDA Economic Research Service On-Line Briefing Room Available online at: http://www.1122-1131. Sinton. (2009).J.usgs. A look back at the U. Handbook of Hydrology (chap. 1–10. McGraw-Hill. Benemann.B.W. Department of Agriculture (USDA).C. Bush.. Lundquist. Woertz.. Geological Survey. Hall. Department of Energy’s aquatic species program--biodiesel from algae. (2002).S. D.gov/prov/prodwat/dictionary. 110(2). U. Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters. Journal of Environmental Engineering. S.ers.A. BioEnergy Research. 68(3). B.R.htm U. and Davies-Colley.htm U.G. 4).S. L. and Perlman. Geological Survey Circular 1200). and Arora. Y. 246-250. T. (1993). R. Pierce.J.. value. Feffer. Woolhiser. Major uses of land in the United States.A.gov/watuse/pdf1995/html/ U.M. A. (2009). Wu. Land use.. and management: Major uses of land. Lynch.A. Climate change and water resources management: A federal perspective. M. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering.S. (1998). D.usda. Shuttleworth. (2002).E.H. J.cr.Sheehan. (U. & Willson.. Available online at: http://water.S. (ANL/ ESD/09-1).. P. Theoretical Maximum Algal Oil Production. D. Weyer. (2006). Darzins. Mapping average daily pan evaporation. (1984). (2009). J.. Department of Agriculture (USDA).. 1993..S.). (NREL/TP-580-24190). and Roessler. Consumptive water use in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. R.. A.S.. P. D. Lipid productivity of algae grown during treatment of dairy and municipal wastewaters..R. Mintz. W.

. and deployment engagement of key public and private stakeholders so approaches.Dewatering . techno-economic modeling and analysis can across the overall algae-to-biofuels supply chain. comparative cost per Techno-Economic Analysis gallon of biofuel for different pathways Given the numerous potential approaches and pathways available for algae biofuels and co-products (as illustrated in Exhibit 10. Such serve a range of purposes and goals that include: analyses can provide improved understanding and insight to help guide successful industry development within the • Assess technical performance and cost/benefit real-world context of technical. It can also help track performance and they can make necessary investments over time to reduce progress (technical.g.1 Objectives of investments. can commercialization of the still relatively immature provide informed guidance for targeting investments in field of algal biofuels also requires the confidence and select technologies. comparative yield and energy balance for different pathways • Assess economic impact of R&D strategies and 10. significant investment is expected to be required to overcome the various technical and economic Exhibit 10. economic. coupled applied across this space and done at different levels of with economic feasibility in the practical implementation precision and granularity. e.10..Separation Hydrocarbons Consolidated Intermediate Lipids Carbohydrates Proteins & Alcohols* Biomass Constituents * Biologically produced in-situ by the organism Biochemical Thermochemical Direct Anaerobic Conversion Conversion Conversion Synthesis Digestion Processes Renewable End Use Fuels Biodiesel Alcohols Biogas Co-Products & Products Hydrocarbons 10. Toward this end. infrastructural.1 High level illustration of various approaches and pathways to developing algae-derived biofuelsand co-products ALGAE Species Unicellular Multicellular Selection & Cyanobacteria Microalgae Macroalgae Biology Open Terrestrial Closed Terrestrial Open Offshore Cultivation Systems Systems Systems System: Hybrid . and quantitative modeling and analyses of systems and processes are needed that span different enterprise levels In short. ranging from individual unit and integrated scale-up for commercial production operations to an integrated enterprise.Fractionation Phototrophic Mixotrophic Phototrophic Heterotrophic Phototrophic . systems. systems. to an overall regional and marketing. tradeoffs among different technologies. environmental. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis Successful development of an algae-based biofuels and challenges along each of these pathways. as illustrated in Exhibit 10. political. and market conditions and constraints. e. Enabling successful advancement and or national resource and supply chain assessment.2. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  93 .1). Systems modeling and analyses technical innovations in systems and processes. and processes. as discussed co-products industry requires the optimum combination of throughout the Roadmap. and environmental) critical technical risks and overcome challenges to developing to meeting performance objectives and reaching goals for an algal biofuels industry. objective successful commercialization.g. processes.Harvesting Systems .

• Assess environmental impact of R&D strategies 10.2 TEA Scope and Methods
and investments, e.g., comparative net greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions per gallon of biofuel for Exhibit 10.3 illustrates at a high level the essential
different pathways elements of techno-economic modeling and analysis.
• Assess consequences and constraints of alternative These intersecting elements present a broad systems
pathways for algal feedstock, biofuels, and co- perspective that integrates the interdependent science
products industry build-up, e.g., land, water, CO2, and engineering aspects specific to developing algae
other nutrients, energy, and infrastructure. biofuels, keeping environmental, economic, and
policy aspects in view to provide critical insight
• Inform R&D and business development investment
and information needed for decision-support.
decisions
• Inform policy decisions and explore “what if” Techno-economic assessment for algae biofuels is
scenarios highly interdisciplinary and will range from GIS-based
• Provide insight and actionable information needed resource and siting assessment, to engineering modeling
to successfully guide technical advancement, of systems and processes at the unit operations level, to
integrated system scale-up, and commercialization interdependency analyses of the entire supply chain. Exhibit
10.4 illustrates a broad systems perspective of issues and
DOE’s Biomass Program employs a wide range of approaches for the overall algae biofuels supply chain from
analytical tools, data, and methodologies to support siting and resources to product end-use. The categories
decision-making, guide research, and demonstrate shown follow the process steps in the algal biofuel supply
progress toward goals. In conjunction with the Algae chain sequence. Such summarization of key areas to be
Roadmap, Biomass Program’s strategic and portfolio addressed to enable algal biofuel production provides
analysis efforts are expanding to include algae with guidance for the scope of content that should be integrated
techno-economic modeling and analysis (TEA), life cycle into systems techno-economic modeling and analysis.
assessment (LCA), and geographic information system
(GIS) based resource assessments.

Exhibit 10.2 Systems and Techno-Economic Modeling and Analysis as a decision-support tool
It can track and assess performance, and evaluate investment cost/benefit/risk tradeoffs to inform both technical and programmatic decisions

S&T, Systems & Processes Areas
Biofuel Conversion
Cost, Performance, and Risk Metrics

Extraction & Fractionation
Harvesting & Dewatering
Algae Science & Biomass Production
Stage-I Advances Systems Infrastructure & Integration
Uncertainty Range

Cost & Risk
Reductions Stage-II Advances
Perfomance
Improvements Commercialization Threshold

Cost & Risk
Reductions
Perfomance
Improvements

T0 (current status) T1 T2 (e.g., 5-15 years)

Roadmap Timeframe Multi-Stage R&D,
Demonstration, Commercializtion, Deployment

94 10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis 

Energy & Fuel Economics; Algal Biomass & Biofuel
Energy-Water-Environment Production Systems,
Interdepencies; Process Engineering
Carbon Emissions & & Other Sciences
Capture

Policy Analysis

Exhibit 10.3 Techno-Economic Modeling and
Analysis addresses interdependent issues

The scope of TEA will ideally include the capability to level, which in turn must function within climate and
apply and integrate detailed process engineering and weather conditions that vary with geographical location,
physics-based modeling at the unit operations level the approach needs to be both multi-level and multi-scale.
with multi-scale and multi-path systems modeling and
comparative tradeoff assessment. This can include An algae biofuels and co-products supply chain will be a
geospatial (GIS-based) data collection, analysis and complex interdependent system with numerous alternative
visualization, systems and processes optimization, pathways and functional elements and feedbacks at various
and dynamic interdependency analyses of the overall spatial and temporal scales and resolutions, as suggested
supply chain at a local, regional, national, or global in Exhibit 10.5. System and process simulation and
scale. A major environmental impact element will optimization under a system engineering framework can
be life cycle analysis (LCA) to assess GHG impacts prove very beneficial for system design and operation. For
and other resource use footprint (e.g., water). example, optimizing conditions that produce the highest
neutral lipid content of the algal biomass under a range
The overall goal is to capitalize on the power and insight of design conditions, when bio-oil feedstock production
available through application of well developed computer is the primary pathway and objective, may not lead to the
modeling and analysis tools combined with disparate highest overall biomass or lipid productivity. Similarly,
database information that exists or can be developed. achieving the most affordable and sustainable production
For example, a process-based algae growth model that of algal feedstock, in terms of resource use intensity
accurately reflects and integrates the dynamic behavior of and cost per unit of end-use biofuel produced under a
the key biological processes with the engineered growth specific set of scenario conditions, may not result from the
system and its time-dependent physical and chemical pursuit of the algal oil production pathway altogether.
conditions (including local time-varying climate and Sensitivity analyses and global system optimization
weather) can not only provide more detailed input to and comparative tradeoff assessments across a range of
the techno-economical performance analysis of algae approaches and conditions are among the critical modeling
cultivation, but can also reveal opportunities for improved and analysis needs. Meeting such needs requires a flexible
system and process design and operation. Since the modeling and analysis framework and suite of tools that
characteristics of the biological system at the microscopic can specifically address the broad scope and multiple
algae cell level affect the performance of the engineered pathways spanned by an algae biofuels supply chain
cultivation system and processes at a higher integrated system. Geospatial GIS-based data integration and analysis

10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  95

Exhibit 10.4 Scoping the content for Systems Techno-Economic Modeling and Analysis: Key topic areas and issues for the overall algal
biofuels supply chain

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION & INTERDEPENDENCIES

Conversion
Algal Biology Cultivation Harvesting & Extraction & Processes Biofuels Policy &
Sitting & Inputs
S&T Systems Dewatering Fractionation Co-Products, Regulation
& Services

Geolocation/ Species Selection Open Ponds Filtering Extract Processes Conversion Processes Taxes
elevation & Matching to - lined Flocculation/ - Solvent - Biochemical Incentives
Land characteristics Growth Conditions - unlined Settling - Acoustic - Thermochemical
- Electromagnetic - Digestion Permitting
Characterization - raceway
Climate/Weather Airlift Flocculation - Other - Hydrotreat/ Enviromental
- wastewater
Solar Insolation Performance treatment Centriuge Seperation/ Refine Impact
Water Souces/ Strain Improvement Closed PBRs Drying Fractionation Fuels Health & Safety
Issuses - horizontal tube Biological Assist - Membrane - Biodiesel Algae Control
- brackish Biomass Growth
- vertical tube - brine shrimp - Distillation - Green diesel & Regulation
- wastewater & Oil Conditions
- vertical planar - fish - Centrifuge - Aviation
- produced Photoautotrophic Other
- other - Other - Gasoline-like
- desalination organism operation Other
Hybrid System Intermediate - EtOH
concentration Products - Biogas/methane
Heterotrophic Combinations
-marine - TAG Oil - Other
organism operation - covered ponds
- fresh - Other Lipids Co-Products
Algae Pathogens, - pond/PBR mix
- losses, re-use ▪ Polar - Feed
- salt build-up Predators, and Heterotrophic ▪ Neutral - Fertilizer
CO2 Sources Mitigations - Industrial - Carbohydrates - Chemicals
- power plants Bioreactors - Proteins Services
- cement plants - Wastewater - Other - Carbon capture
- fermentation/ Facilities Compounds - Water treatment
other - Water
Operations,
Chemical/Materials Monitoring & Direct secretion
Energy/Power Maintenance of EtOH or
hydrocarbon fuel
Infrastructure
precursors into
growth medium,
avoiding Harvest &
Dewatering steps

is also key to siting and resource assessment and the design, uncertainty in data while still capturing the underlying
analysis and optimization of facilities location and supply dymanics of the overall system. Although quantitative
chain logistics (from algae cultivation through end-use uncertainty will remain, the results can provide qualitative
fuels and products biorefining, transport, and distribution). system behavior and trends still useful in helping
guide technical, economic, and policy decisions. More
Algal biofuels remain an emerging field at a relatively thorough analysis and modeling refinement, informed
immature stage of development. As a result, data for by field data expected to become available as larger-
detailed unit operations and process analyses for different scale pilot and demonstration projects are established
technical approaches for algae cultivation, harvesting, and and operated, will more clearly reveal the most critical
post-processing into fuels and other co-products is currently challenges and guide investments and technical advances
sparse and uncertain. Selected modeling and analysis needed to enable successful commercialization of
approaches can be used to effectively accommodate such economical, scalable, and sustainable algal biofuels.

96 10. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis 

3 Suggestions for TEA and supply chain. soil) Broader . Demand & Price for Co-Products vs.Land (cost. identified the need to clearly define the scope and determine and that the two should be coupled.7.Autotrophic . Operations.Closed systems &/or Drying & Seperation . and therefore. tilt. their alternatives. similar to the modeling approaches. as exemplified by Exhibit 10.Nutrients (NPK) or Treatment & Re-Use . It was noted that there Preparation for the Algae Roadmap Workshop and the is a need and role for both integrated systems modeling as discussion among participants during and after the event well as detailed engineering design and process modeling.Equipment .Labor . Exhibit 10. Incentives & Barriers Siting . different levels within the broad systems scope presented. Monitoring. or enterprise level rather than broader efforts. Replacement Market Externalities: Cost of Energy. unit operation. Workshop participants the role that systems TEA and LCA can and should play generally agreed that modeling and analysis should be a in support of algal biofuels development. Also identified critical part of a national algae biofuels research program was the need to adapt.Species .Solar Insolation Environment . Included in the Workshop discussions was the question of Due to their more limited and immediate business how best to approach the multiple and disparate paths objectives. scales.Hybrid systems Feedbacks Resources Proteins & Conversion . Details of systems’ and processes’ technical and economic performance achieved by industry and LCA Approach (Workshop other technology developers are also usually considered Results and Discussion) proprietary.Temperatures Design & Economy Feedbacks Nutrient . location. etc. develop. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  97 .6 illustrates various complementary modeling and scales will be defined in the early stages of the systems analysis approaches and techniques that come into play at modeling R&D effort and will evolve as time goes on. It is also expected available and emerging information and data. Exhibit that the needs for coupled models of differing fidelity and 10. Cost of Petroleum & Conventional Fuels. geology.Water Water Capture . One approach with photoautotrophic microalgae integrated systems modeling and analysis across the is modeling major cultivation system categories 10.Characteristics . and utilize a range of and industry development effort.Climate/Weather Feedbacks Conversion Carbohydrates Biofuels Algae Cultivation .Materials Energy Feedbacks . that should tend to focus on a technology or process.5 The dynamic coupling and interdependencies across the algal biofuels and co-products supply chain 10.Primary Energy Electric Power and Process Heat Generation Capital Construction. be considered in algae biofuels modeling and analysis production plant. individualized modeling and analysis efforts and configurations of rapidly evolving systems and by industry and technology development organizations processes.Capital Co-Gen .CO2 / Flue Gas Conditioning Other Coproducts .Performance . unavailable for broader use and objective assessment and validation. Policy & Regulation.Heterotrophic .GMOs Biology . Maintenance.Requirements Harvesting Dewatering Extraction Oil / Lipids .Open systems . and levels of detail best suited to and analysis efforts underway by DOE in support of the perform the necessary modeling and analyses based on other bioenergy and biofuels programs.

GIS Analysis. and activating only those portions of the issues and tradeoffs that need to be addressed together to hybrid configuration model desired..g. development. and processes and performance parameters is another definitions. transport. closed photobioreactors.Required build-up of new infrastructure. from resources & sitting through production to end use • Algae biofuel and co-products industry scale-up potential. and interface approaches. economic. constraints & impacts . how better inform technical. production availability. The size of the “matrix” engineering design... 98 10. economic.Integration with existing infrastructure .. The disadvantage of such a be established for system and process functional blocks that distributed and narrowly focused approach is that it is often would enable the development of an open-source modeling done in isolation with limited or no consideration of other and assessment platform with “plug & play” flexibility. regional. storage • GREET (Argonne National Lab) infrastructure • LEM (UC/ Davis). Higher-Level Dynamic Meta-Systems Modeling (Integrated Analysis Framework) • Broad value-chain scope. and policy issues • Feedbacks and Multiple Sector Interdependencies. • Other infrastructure and enviromental features Exhibit 10. with time delays. or a hybrid competing options and the broader scope of interdependent combination. processes and integrated systems for commercialization. enviromental.ICARUS cost estimate software (or equivalent) • Operations & Maintenance cost estimates Geographic Information System (GIS) Analysis and Visualization • Cost (& offsets) of co-product feedstock • Land resources (characteristics. • Cost (& offsets) of co-products production other) • Carbon footprint cost accounting • Climate/ Weather/ Temperature Conditions • CO2 resources ( point source emitters.Vendor/ Supplier cost estimates (ASPEN+) • Engineering and construction cost estimates • Process GHG footprint (LCA) assessment . Flexibility and usefulness Developing numerous detailed models that are each could be increased to the extent that such modeling uniquely customized to a specific combination of systems and analysis can be done using common standards. and optimization of of possibilities could quickly become unmanageable. with learning curves & improvement projections . across an emerging approach.. Narrowly “beginning-to-end value chain” for algal biofuels focused and detailed technical and economic modeling production with adequate resolution and detail is very and analysis is valuable and necessary for those doing challenging and still emerging. and national level. and policy decisions to best conceptualize a model that spans the overall at the state. specific technologies.... and Life Cycle Analysis of open pond. etc.. pipelines) Other LCA Modeling • Fuel processing. Etc.) • Cost of biofuel production • Water resources (fresh wastewater. various groups doing ad-hoc modeling and assessment specifically focused on their chosen approach and Standardized interface requirements and definitions could technologies (e. and essentially represents what exists today with “community of practice” for the algae biofuels industry. can link to other models & analyses Process Flow Enginering Modeling Static CAPEX & OPEX Calculations • System and process equipment cost estimates • Mass & energy balance calculations . resource use..Engineering & construction estimates from industry . Beyond this.6 Multiple levels and complementary approaches available for Algal Biofuels Systems and Processes Techno-Economic Modeling. platform). Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  .Technical.

1 Algae species 3. To facilitate system-level • Universities doing a wide range of technical/ thinking during the Workshop. Biodiesel 5.3 Water 3. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  99 . cultivation systems) or process engineering models using widely accepted and applied commercial process modeling tools like AspenPlusTM or customized spreadsheets. and represents utilizing different techniques such as high performance an example of a GIS-based information gathering physics-based modeling (e. etc. computational fluid dynamics and analysis platform that can be productively used modeling of open raceway ponds or closed photobioreactor and leveraged for algae biofuels development. universities. etc.g.1 Closed system 1. Aviation 6. Fatty Acids M. Other Q. 4. assessment.Distribution . Ethanol 1.4 Systems Analysis Flexibility in being able to link custom subsystem or process models into an overall meta-system Overview modeling and analysis framework would provide a System analysis is foundational to designing a strategy capability that could be of significant value and benefit for algal biofuel deployment. 5.0 J.1.1 Solar .2 Land Cultivation 3.3 Hybrid systems & settling 1.3 Macroalgae R. EPA.) 4.Transport fish excrement. a process flow diagram was economic/policy R&D and assessment developed and presented at every breakout track discussion to illustrate the intricate interdependencies of algal • Industry developing and commercializing technologies.3 Biochemical E.2 Co-products 1. processes of the flow diagram that shows a representative number • Private investment / funding sources 10.2 Electromagnetic 5.7 High-level multi-pathway algae biofuel process flow diagram for the algal biofuels and co-products supply chain Much more detailed or custom models of individual Work currently underway on the Knowledge Discovery subsystem or process blocks could then be developed by Framework (KDF) by DOE’s Biomass Program is various others in industry. Fertilizer Inputs 1.1.1. USDA. Hydrogen K. Feed 1. 10. and a high-level illustration of the interdependent character tracking of program investments of the overall algae biofuels value chain that involves a • Other federal and state agencies (Department of broad range of systems. Proteins P.4 BY PASS A. Exhibit 10.1 Microalgae Conservation F. Carbohydrates O.3 Chemical G.1. Energy Source derivative biomass & Markets 3. A system is an aggregation to different stakeholder communities such as: of subsystems interacting such that the system is able to deliver an over-arching functionality.2 Cyanobacteria R. and other technical Defense. Exhibit 10.5 provides • DOE & national labs doing R&D.End Use Exhibit 10.Field . Materials 2.Storage 4.2 Filtering 8.4 BY PASS 6.0 Extraction Conservation 6.1 Physical (Thermo/Mechanical) 5.2 Open system 2. Green diesel 6. processes.0 Drying ..7 is a revised adaptation systems. moving in this direction (Getman. Dried Algal 1. Triglycerides N.1. Gasoline-like 6. Biogas / Methane Metabolites I.0 1.3 Centrifuging biomass 3.4 Off-shore systems 3.5 Biological Assist 2.1 Flocculation 2.1 Fuel 5. Chemicals 2.5 Biological assist Harvesting (shrimp. and national labs. 2009).0 Harvesting L.2 Thermochemical & Separation D. Wet algal or biological assist Infrastructure 1.3 CO2 2.5 Light or Alt.) and non-technical issues.2 Fuel . biofuel production.1. Lipids H.1 Chemical C.

The cost include AspenPlusTM and FLUENTTM.) uncertainties. Though it may seem daunting to system component are shown. more approximate preliminary spreadsheet analyses are more appropriate as a first step. solar insolation. and Analysis tools (referenced also in chapter 9) are indispensible for algae production and supply Other chapters of this Roadmap point out the lack chain systems analysis due to their ability to perform of availability of detailed information about the mapping and resource analysis spanning local. hydrodynamic. The overall viability and examine the sensitivity of different options for hydrogen production include goal gasification. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . Example engineering analysis tools scale-up was touched on earlier in chapter 9. assumptions in individual processes to the overall system. Simpler and process becomes the primary task of the systems analysis.) enumerated and designated as goals to be achieved. especially where Both Exhibit 10. Sub-level accurate analyses. producing algal biofuels and co-products by quantifying precipitation. etc. Exhibit 10. K) supplies. Critical climatic and natural (energy requirements and costs) of the systems and resource data can be readily accessed. GIS Assessments sustainable production of microalgae biomass. and environmental impacts.) interdependencies and feedbacks. availability of suitable land. pipelines) offs from various scenarios with regard to cost. most of which are still immature and An example of this type of analysis is presented in emerging. and understanding key information from each node in the and other local environmental conditions. evaluate costs. and organic molecule reforming. wind electrolysis. etc. • Fuel processing. storage infrastructure technical performance. Systems analysis can help manage the complexity of • Climatic characteristics (temperature. Established in 2003 in response to the Hydrogen what steps in the process are most energy intensive. These Engineering analyses (technical and economic) at the include climate and the adequate availability of water. identifying and appropriately modeling • Water evaporation loss (function of climate. A substantial number of barriers are (characteristics. (N. among others. unit operations level require the systematic calculation efficiency of water use. etc. and others beyond balance systems level view of an algal biomass and algal those selected for inclusion in the figures also exist or lipid cultivation and extraction system.8 represent a large detailed process engineering data may be lacking. from algae growth processes involved to appropriately formulate and conduct to fuel and co-product processing and end-use. development of mass and energy based systems models energy and environmental tradeoffs and set research can help evaluate different proposed processes for priorities and inform policy by sound analysis. Inputs to each will likely emerge. characteristics of algae themselves and the characteristics and national scales.5 and Exhibit 10. Collecting such as time-dependent solar insolation. availability. and comparing trade. This may also require coupling processes that made up different thematic topic discussion with appropriate external data and driving functions sessions in the Workshop are all inter-related. and chemical kinetics of the systems and of these resource can have on algae biofuel production processes used. and benefit tradeoffs of CO2 capture through biofixation which require sufficient understanding and detailed using photoautotrophic microalgae cultivation enhanced 100 10. The pathways toward a hydrogen economy. P. temperature. • Other infrastructure and environmental features Engineering Analyses and Several critical resource factors will impact large-scale. risk. of a given algal biomass production system and show 2009). • CO2 resources (point source emitters. and tracking of mass and energy balances that include and availability of supplemental CO2 and other nutrient evaluation of the thermodynamic.8 represents a mass and energy on the product or co-product chosen. transport.of multiple path process options available for every step technical information and data about the systems and in the algal biofuel production chain. Many of the process steps will differ depending Exhibit 10. thus Fuel Initiative. The impact that availability and cost biological. regional.8. number of permutations of potential pathways to algal biofuel production. there is precedence for this value of this kind of systems mass and energy balance sort of undertaking in DOE’s Hydrogen Analysis (H2A) assessment is that it can help assess the overall viability Project within the overall Hydrogen Program (DOE. The many process permutations.8. nuclear energy. H2A was designed to consider various highlighting areas for research and development. This program could serve as a guide for moving Geographic Information System (GIS) Visualization forward with analysis of algal biofuel production. such as: processes that are shown in the process flow diagram • Land and water resources of Exhibit 10. and each numbered node attempt to develop a comparative analysis based on so represents a mass or energy balance calculation.

This information. of combining these types of spatial and physical data to To the extent that operations can be effectively co-located project possible algal production scenarios as a function of or established within reasonable distances across the geography and climate is an interesting avenue of inquiry.) forcing functions and boundary transport. ambient temperature. the economics can be expected to improve. the data available to implement this type of analysis are thought to be preliminary and refinement Producing biofuels that are highly compatible. in press). from the operation and monitoring of larger scale algae distribution. and policy decisions. Midstream will be the includes an algae growth model driven by environmental logistics of transport.g.9 is an example of the and costs of supplying inputs needed for algae production application of high-performance computational modeling (suitable siting. Exhibit 10. • POLYSYS At the downstream end. tools and capabilities to an open raceway pond system that supplemental CO2. • Equipment.. followed downstream by the necessary concentrations. supply chain. this will include the logistics different site conditions. nutrients. sourcing.. storage. Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Neutral Lipid Bioreactor Harvesting Harvesting Dewatering Solvent Air & CO2 Dewatering Extraction &/ or Pond e. and biorefining into fuels and (e. nutrient other co-products. geographic location attributes and time dependent climate The economics of algae-based biofuels and co-products and weather data. the relative location and • ICARUS cost estimate software (or equivalent) logistical costs associated with fuel processing.g. and data are also integral to system analysis as they reveal financial sets developed and leveraged to provide the necessary investment or market incentives needed for algae biofuel assessment capabilities to guide research. tools. Biomass e.) Water Energy Residues: TAGs & Other Facilities. same would apply to co-products and their potential markets. can provide powerful feedstock production and downstream processing can be capabilities for estimating performance and for improving integrated with existing infrastructure and markets. Some examples are: development. Co-products Polar Lipid Site Preparation Carbohydrate 10. is discussed in more detail through a few selected The combination of GIS resource assessment. e.. Land. resource management. and distribution into the various end-use conditions (James and Varun. analysis and LCA (CAPEX ) and operational expense (OPEX) calculations for algae. etc. or totally based on model improvement and validation with data fungible. Equipment. and Capture & Neutral Lipid Systems Infrastructure. re-use Potrential Protein Biofuel Feedstock Materials. including example calculations presented later in this chapter.. storage.g. These and related issues should be an integral Economic analysis tools for static capital expense part of techno-economic modeling. K. with the existing hydrocarbon fuel handling. with the appropriate models.g. Utilities. can help determine the practical upper limit • Cost (& offsets) of co-product feedstock production • Cost of biofuel production • Carbon footprint cost accounting Exhibit 10.. storage. The possibility fuel and co-product markets at the end of the suppy chain. and transport of water. P. Hexane System Chemical Dissolved Air Recovery & Centrifuge Drying Solvent Nutrients Flocculation Flotation (N. Currently. etc. and distribution infrastructure could benefit from GIS analysis.by the addition of CO2 from industrial sources will affect on the size and the optimum site locations of biorefinery the economics of algal biofuel production. solar insolation.g. for • Discounted cash flow analysis example. with physics-based modeling of will depend in large measure on the degree to which algae cultivation systems and algae growth.g. The conditions with multiple species of algae could be useful. business deployment. Operation & Maintenance cost estimates transport. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  101 . e.g.. e.. At the the technical design of systems and their operations for front end of the supply chain. and energy).8 Notional baseline algae feedstock production system Sunlight H2O Energy & Solvent & Water & O2 Other Inputs Energy Energy H2O Recycle Microalgae Photo. Hexane microfiltration e. Potential facilities relative to upstream algae biomass production CO2 capture and utilization in algae biomass production and downstream fuel and co-product markets. and end-use infrastructure would result in production systems under a range of site and climate easier and more widespread market acceptance. Structures.

. and mixotrophic) for which geographical in particular. approach the same order of magnitude as large scale There are. Si. and affordable accessibility of such water sources. productivity. on the other hand. Open raceway pond example of physics-based algae cultivation system modeling and anlaysis. but it is appropriate here to briefly note • The supply. aspects of large scale agriculture. and will be heavily dependent on geographical location and local conditions. Exhibit 10. based of culture that will need to be processed on a daily on the expected losses. seasonal.) (Weyer et al. in press) area of cultivation systems needed to achieve a set Recent analysis suggests an upper theoretical limit on amount of product. and nutrient gradients • Solar insolation and other environmental. Certain elements. but these commercial algae industry build-up scenarios.5. particularly with open systems subject to macroalgae and microalgae cultivation (autotrophic. photosynthetic efficiency. Capture and re-use of non-fresh water. availability.700 gal/ac-yr. water.S. etc. Such analysis can enable both performance prediction and pond system design optimization after appropriate refinement and validation with monitored field system data (Adapted from James and Varun. carbon materials from industrial or municipal waste This variation will determine the spatial surface streams can provide bridge feedstock in the near- 102 10. though important for overall TE analysis. • Availability. These aspects were discussed in some detail in Chapter 9. as well as other climate-related the availability of high solar insolation consistent with factors such as temperature and weather (cloud lower latitudes and/or high percentage of clear weather cover. and fertilizer. the productivity and reliability of production. and sustainability of suitable water Impact of Geographic Variability of supplies for algae production will be a key input factor Inputs on Algal Biofuel Production Costs for inland cultivation. precipitation. 50% oil content. and cost of organic carbon the following: feedstock needed as input for heterotrophic microalgae production will play a major role in the commercial • The average annual insolation is generally the viability and extent to which national production dominant and rate-limiting factor for autotrophic algal capacity can expand using the heterotrophic approach. availability.9.) will also affect both conditions. temperature. like cost of subject to more limited water supplies. climate. evaporative loss. Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Algal Raceway Pond Using Modified EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers Codes • The Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) solves 3D Navier-Stokes equations of open channel flow to model speed. and annual variation in other assumptions made in the analysis (which include solar insolation. etc. wind. and it will affect the amount limit on the order of ~4. heterotrophic. but will variation of resource availability will have major impacts be dependent on the geographical location. it will affect the amount of CO2 the order of ~38. coastal. the variations. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  .000 gal/ac-yr and perhaps a practical that can be captured.350 . and this factor varies widely across the Sugar from commodity crops and other organic country among inland. The daily. and offshore sites. are amount of water required nationally could begin to not unique to the development of algal biofuel technology. can potentially help fill this need. on cost of production and scale for commercial viability. vary over the U. P. and basis. Under large power. and meteorological forcing functions • Includes algal biomass growth model • CE-QUAL couples nutrient kinetics and 22 independent variables (N. Areas The various inputs necessary for algal biofuel production of the country with the highest solar resource best have been described earlier in this chaper and in other suited for algae growth also tend to be more arid and chapters of the Roadmap. O2…) to model growth rates. 2009). cost.

but evaporation will also add to • CO2 availability and cost of delivery will play a major operating cost (for water replacement and/or for salt role in autotrophic microalgae cultivation scalability management with brackish or saline water. other) production. and operating expense. If it is agriculture (Huang. The key tradeoffs will be between the cost Under large commercial algae industry build-up of overall production (capital and operating costs) scenarios. and is a consideration that appropriately processing lignocellulosic biomass requires further investigation.. term. and petroleum). N. but this the cost of operations. algae can require as smaller parcels of land or offshore sites. and costs of offshore cost of lignocellulosic material deconstruction into marine operations will have a major impact on simple sugars and other organic carbon compounds costs of production. As noted here and in chapter closed systems operating inland can overheat. availability. In necessary to distribute the facility over a number of the absence of nitrogen fixation. 1998. though it is not yet energy crops. It is reasonably (i. and forest industries. 2009) can potentially help supply specific strains for extended durations. 2005). The capture and reuse of nutrients • As in traditional agriculture. 9. risks. 2009). materials will also depend on technical advances For offshore sites. scale. the logistics and costs could impact the suitability of residual biomass for associated with producing. and and processing improvements needed to reduce the the associated logistics. Commercial fertilizer costs are overall cost of total algal biomass and intermediate tied closely to the cost of energy supplies (natural gas feedstock fraction (e. adding to the cost. carbohydrates. the right of access and use. Cost of site preparation and suitable for feeding heterotrophic microalgae. the size of an autotrophic algae of suboptimal (high or low) temperature. and and costs as transporting and distributing CO2. For open nutrients for algae production scale-up. such as are present in some forms of flue gas. and can be an appreciable factor in proteins. where recent cost and supply input resources with the required output product issues have had negative impacts on the industry processing and distribution infrastructure and markets. some sources are likely to require more cleanup than others (especially if there are plans for animal feed as a co-product and/or if the CO2 source stream includes 10. carbon credits materials in the form of woody and herbaceous must also enter into this analysis. The quality of the systems will provide the same engineering problems CO2 source will also play a role for algal growth. (Huang. This As with cellulosic ethanol. but major sustainable scale-up of national contaminants that inhibit algae growth).. 2008). and perhaps also for offshore sites. but for each approach operational costs for algae (Massingale et al. water evaporation rates will provide some level of and affordable accessibility of such nutrient sources. dependent on the geographical location. waste materials from agriculture clear how best to factor this into the calculation. on the industrial build-up.. if not more. P. but this will be systems operating at inland sites in the summer. infrastructure facilities for offshore.. it may not much.. The affordability of • Land prices and availability can also impact the cost generating organic carbon feedstock from such of biofuel production at inland and coastal sites. derived originally from lignocellulosic biomass.e. Waste heat and energy from will not be feasible in all instances and thus. lipids. Mehta and Gaur. nitrogen than conventional biomass be possible to get the most benefit of economies of crops on a mass balance basis (Alexander et al. and inland • The supply. it may be co-located industries or the CO2 source may allow necessary to transport CO2 over some distance. transporting. 2009. temperature control. 2009). but applying facility will require extensive pipeline infrastructure for this heat or energy to extensive algal cultivation CO2 distribution. Conversely. the amount of nutrients required nationally versus the matching of affordable production scale to could begin to approach the same order of magnitude the sustainable and affordable supply of the required as large scale agriculture. Algae can be production capacity will demand the use of sugars effective at capturing and concentrating heavy metal and other suitable organic carbon source materials contaminants (Aksu. and cost of other nutrients sites will all be location-dependent. it will be advantageous to co-locate cultivation requiring active cooling that can add prohibitively to facilities with stationary industrial CO2 sources.g. coastal. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  103 . and municipal waste streams will be location-dependent. Finally. Malcolm et al. K) required as inputs for algae growth will straightforward to calculate the impact of the cost also play a role in commercial viability and extent of of land. the temperature during from various agricultural and municipal waste streams the growing season will restrict the ability to cultivate (Woertz et al. and co-products like animal feed. availability. Even in active thermal management for growth during periods the case of co-location.. 2008) it will likely be an optimum minimum and range to the same extent as for large scale commercial of size for a commercial production facility.

and policy issues • Feedbacks and Multiple Sector Interdependencies with links to other models and analyses 104 10. energy. 2001 and 2002). Delucchi. 1997). or service. UNEP. and other resources. a general lack of demonstrated operating parameters The systems modeling and analysis framework for algae and widely varying basic assumptions on a number of biofuels must include the integration of appropriate parameters from algal productivity to capital depreciation LCA methodology and metrics (Curran.11 illustrates the typical life cycle stages considered in an LCA and the typical inputs/ Dynamics Modeling outputs measured. including the raw material acquisition required to manufacture the product 10. EPA. waste stream 2002 and 2004). from manufacture. delays. modeling. would be subject to narrow operating margins. however. eliciting discussion. and water. EPA. 1987). 2009). they also present a wide based on other renewable and non-renewable feedstocks. and numerous others (EPA. shortcomings of the existing literature and modeling 2005). it is system performance for an industry that has yet to be likely that a technology that will require the production commercially realized is one of the biggest challenges for of immense volumes of biofuel at affordable cost so it techno-economic analysis. LCA is important for assessing relative Oswald. output flows. the UC/Davis Lifecycle Emission Model (Delucci. • Input resources. and maintenance. In resource capture and reuse.g.g. There are indications. Benemann and and processes. to final disposal.In summary. and tools have been developed that include Argonne National • Algae biofuel and co-products industry scale-up Laboratory’s GREET “well-to-wheels” model (ANL. 1997.. 1993). While most algal biofuels production. These 1993. and specifically leverage past and current LCA knowledge base present a challenge in designing scaled work specific to biofuels (ANL 2009. siting through production to end use LCA methodologies.5 Algae Production production will benefit from detailed inputs that take into consideration the variations in cost and availability of the Costs and Uncertainties essential elements for cultivation. the calculations for the cost of algal biofuel 10. and compiling suggested directions for research and development from the participants. Department of Energy (e. algal oil feedstock Life Cycle Analysis production cost analyses were reviewed based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a “cradle-to-grave” range of sources to gauge the status of algal biofuel analysis approach for assessing the resource use and technology. co-generation addition to net GHG emissions. To facilitate the Workshop’s can play a significant role in the national energy economy objectives of identifying needs. and co-product credits.S.. Exhibit 10. learning curves and improvement projections • Technical.12 (ISO. These included technical reports prepared environmental impacts and tradeoffs of industrial systems for the U. 2006. and in comparison with fuels citable sources are quite dated. life cycle impact assessment (LCIA).6 Preliminary System (EPA. 1997. data base resources. resource use. constraints and impacts 2009). nutrients. The process employs a and scenario studies. While these variations Data gathering and validation of technical and economic may be minor relative to the technical uncertainties. combination of improved biological productivity and fully integrated production systems can bring the cost The term “life cycle” refers to the major activities in the down to a point where algal biofuels can be competitive course of the product’s life-span. white papers / industry analyses. Bernard. environmental. and • Broad value-chain scope: from resources and interpretation as illustrated in Exhibit 10. with petroleum at approximately $100 per barrel. 2004) up systems. 1996. A dynamics simulation model also phased approach that consists of four major components: provides an integrated analysis framework that can include: goal definition and scoping. process. 1996). economic.. use. ISO. energy) impacts among different approaches to personal communications with field experts. Tapie and GHG emissions and other resource utilization (e. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . LCA for biofuels can also • Integration with existing infrastructure assess impacts and tradeoffs associated with utilization • Required build-up of new infrastructure with time intensity for water. life cycle inventory analysis (LCI). variability in approach to final costs (from per gallon LCA is considered to be a key element of the scope of TE of algal oil to per kg of “raw” biomass) and illustrate modeling and analysis within the context of this roadmap. LCA is a systematic technique to assess Systems dynamics modeling is a powerful and flexible the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated modeling approach that can foster collaborative analysis with a product. 2009.g. that a and including algae (Kadam. peer-reviewed literature (e. costs. operating costs. potential. EPA.

Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  105 . fuel portfolio along with the ability to do Monte Carlo simulation. • Incorporate appropriate insights and benefit from alliances with industry associations 10.g. data and assumptions from the same information sources discussed earlier in this chapter and in chapter • Determine the current state of technology 9. expanding The model described above was initially prepared in detail later as available and needed outline form for the algae roadmap workshop. technical • Identify research areas most in need of support and economic performance for various pathways. and has • Employing modular modeling. and resource constraints. • Establishing interface requirements between To adequately inform research and investment decisions sub-systems for algal biofuel deployment.can facilitate the • Identify critical path elements that offer opportunities use of the model to conduct rapid ‘what if’ analyses and for cost reduction tradeoff studies using different yield scenarios. ISBL and OSBL been developed further since the workshop.The development of a system dynamics model for \in techno-economic analysis and the capture of data conducting scenario analysis of algal biofuels production from fielded systems as they emerge over time can scale-up and operations was initiated as part of the roadmap provided needed additional information. continued progress INPUTS OUTPUTS Atmospheric Raw Materials Acquisition Emissions Waterborne Raw Materials Wastes Manufacturing Solid Wastes Use / Reuse / Maintenance Coproducts Energy Recycle / Waste Management Other Releases System Boundary Exhibit 10. e. Workshop effort and is currently a work in progress. The model will eventually include • Identify external factors that will impact cost more detailed systems and processes modules for multiple • Provide plan for entry of algal biofuel into a renewable pathways being pursued for algae biofuels and co-products.11 Scope of Life Cycle Analysis (Adapted from EPA 1993) 10. • Inform and perhaps guide formation and/or varying parameters values within pre-set ranges in order modifications to public policy to describe the uncertainty or robustness of model output.7 Potential Directions The Techno-Economic Analysis can accomplish this by: for R&D Effort • Stressing dynamics over detail initially. Interactive graphical user interfaces. The preliminary participants specifically suggested that the following modeling uses algae production and resource availability areas be addressed in the modeling and analysis. The model approaches1 currently includes only a limited amount of available data.

have been identified along various steps in the value chain.12 Phases of a Life Cycle Analysis (Adapted from ISO. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . the development. and evaluation of larger-scale algae biofuel production systems and processes that can provide data to validate and improve the modeling. A critical complementary need is • Maintaining industry standard notation. Throughout the roadmap workshop and report development When done in a closely coordinated spiral development process. Goal Defination and Scope Interpretatation Inventory Impact Analysis Assessment Exhibit 10. significant algae-to-biofuels production system and fashion. Addressing the uncertainties in a systematic more rapid technological advancement leading toward and integrated modeling and analysis framework will help commercialization. operation. monitoring. and the experimental and operational investigations These have been noted in this and earlier chapters of the with larger-scale systems in the field. guide needed investments and speed the deployment of an 106 10. 1997) • Leveraging university and industry resources algal biofuels industry. etc. units. can facilitate Roadmap. the complementary bi-lateral feedback of process performance uncertainties (technical and economic) information and insight between the modeling and analysis.

html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). James. and Varun. 2004.A. (2009). Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: Process options and economics. Second generation biofuels: High-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. 20. (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress and prospects.P. Fertilizer Prices. Tam. McGraw-Hill. J.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET/ AspenTech (2010). and Roessler. J. DOE (2009). “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Lifecycle Analyses of Transportation Fuels“. and energy use in transportation (GREET) model. K. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  107 . J. J. Cincinnati: Ohio. 20–43. Thomas-Hall.H. Bioenergy conversion factors. Report prepared for the Pittsburg Energy Technology Center. Bioenergy Research. P. http://www. Energy Convers. D. International Standards Organization. and Oswald. Kruse.html Getman. E.. (1998). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1997).osti. O.R. Delucchi. Kadam. Available online at: http://www. Journal of Computational Biology. (1998).27. Benemann.F. F. Available online at: http://www. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. “Factors Contributing to the Recent Increase in U. “Ethanol and a Changing Agricultural Landscape”. C. A. AspenTech software product portfolio. Marx. Medina. Office of Research and Development. The greenhouse gas.energy. S. 37-54. “Environmental implications of power generation via coal-microalgae cofiring”.nrel.anl. 2002-08”.Life cycle assessment . DOE Hydrogen Program. Scott A. “Microalgae Production from Power Plant Flue Gas: Environmental Implications on a Life Cycle Basis”. and Chisti. E. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).transportation.. Energy v. (2003). regulated emissions. G. Kadam. Acien Fernandez.References Aksu. Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO2 to biomass. UCD-ITS-RR-04-45. K. Office of Research and Development.R. 1997. Berlin. Kadam. Environmental management . ISBN 0-07-015063-X. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment. Optimizing algae growth in open-channel raceways. Argonne National Laboratory (2009). Huang. NREL Report No.localenergy.jsp?query_id=1&page=0&osti_id=493389 Curran (1996).” In: Wastewater Treatment with Algae. B. Dunahay. pp. pp.pdf 10. http://www. Posten. Mark (2004). Schenk. “Power Plant Flue Gas as a Source of CO2 for Microalgae Cultivation: Economic Impact of Different Process Options”. (2008). (1993). 25(3).. including AspenPlus® and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (formerly Aspen Icarus Process Evaluator®). (1997).gov/bridge/product.. 1(1). USDA.gov/h2a_analysis.gov/docs/legosti/fy98/24190. November 2009. 2002. T..aspentech. TP-510-29417. Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles. Springer-Verlag.energy. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. (2006). (in press). Y-S Won and N. S. S505-S510. Biotechnology Advances. Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms.gov/ and specifically the DOE Hydrogen Analysis (H2A) Project: http://www.. (EPA/600/R-92/245)..Principles and Framework. Bioenergy knowledge discovery framework. (Grant No. C..G. (2003). B. B. Sheehan. M. A. (EPA/600/R-06/060).K.L. 113-152. Life cycle assessment: Principles and practice.E. February 2009. (2008).C. (2009). W. 100(2). 491-515.L. K. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. E. Cincinnati: Ohio..H.epa. Malcolm. P. A look back at the U. March 2009. International Standards Organization.S. USDA ERS Report Number 86... pp.. U. Molina. Belarbi. (2001). Curran (ed). 203-212. and Marca Weinberg (2009). eds. (1996). (NREL/TP-580-24190)..L.org/pdfs/Document%20Library/Bioenergy%20conversion%20factors. S. and Gaur.hydrogen. Wen-yuan (2009). ISO 14040.. ERS Report AR-33. (2002).hydrogen. US-EPA LCA Resources Web Site (latest update July 2009): Available on line at: http://www. Mgmt. Mehta.. J.biblio. Mussgnug. DOE’s aquatic species program – Biodiesel from algae. Suppl.. DE-FG22- 93PC93204). Available online at: http://www. v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).S. Biosorption of heavy metals by microalgae in batch and continuous systems. Stephens.pdf Rittmann. http://www. Geographic Information Science and Technology Group.gov/ord/NRMRL/lcaccess/resources. Y.38. and Hankamer. 905-922. Marcel Aillery.com/core/ Benneman.Y.

. (2009). R. K. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. American Society of Civil Engineers.estis. Feffer. v135. Theoretical Maximum Algal Oil Production. net/sites/lcinit/default. A. 108 10. P and Bernard. Nelson (2009). and Y. Available online at: http://jp1. (2005). Microalgae production: Technical and economic evaluations. 1 -10. A. United Nations Environmental Program. A. BioEnergy Research.. Journal of Environmental Engineering.asp?site=lcinit&page_id=138F5949-6997-4BE6-A553-585E92C22EE4#lcirap Weyer.. United Nations Enivironment Programme (UNEP). Life cycle approaches: The road from analysis to practice. B. 32. 873-885.. D. n11. 1115-1122. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Systems and Techno-Economic Analysis  . T. Bush. M. Darzins. Lundquist. Woertz.Tapie. (1987). I. D. “Algae Grown on Dairy and Municipal Wastewater for Simultaneous Nutrient Removal and Lipid Production for Biofuel Feedstock”. & Willson. pp.

This chapter discusses potential models for public-private and government agencies and laboratories in partnerships in general and specifically as related to algal various combinations to pool resources in pursuit biofuels. Brown et al.11. as well as reduces the risk of private 2001. 2006). 2002). Link could. but also for research and technology developments of national interest (Stiglitz and Wallsten. realizing benefits in both categories.A 11.g. many of which may be investor-backed and of DOE programs on the clean energy sector (Brown. Public-Private Partnerships   109 . This partnerships are documented (Audretsch et al.1 The Benefits of Algal Biofuels While benefiting both private and public entities from Public-Private Partnerships shared investment toward mutual objectives. in turn. 11. national laboratories and universities) for development of algal biofuels. infrastructure projects. Public-Private Partnerships The Workshop participants emphasized the need The algal biofuels industry is evolving with numerous for DOE and other federal agencies to partner with players. analyses of various federal agencies exposure to fundamental science and engineering R&D. given the current state of of a sustainable. The type of this industry. and industry. the business strategies of many existing partnership most relevant to the advancement of the algal companies are focused on one or more aspects of biofuels industry is perhaps the research partnership algae. universities. thereby facilitating growth and development infancy. academia. including specific studies on the impacts firms. industry) and public entities (e. 2002.1 Benefits of algal biofuels public-private partnerships Public Benefits Shared Benefits Private Benefits Energy Security Innovation Quickens Technolgy Commercialization Long-term Clean Fuel Shared Risk & Industry Growth & Market Stability Capital Efficiency Solution Shared Investment Competitive Edge Climate Change Migration Domestic Energy Supply Breakdown Legal & Jobs Creation Sustainable Industry Regulatory Hurdles Clean Energy & Development Science Leadership Growth Stimulates Labor Pool A In this situation. including characteristics Exhibit 11. 2001. Industry benefits from public-private partnerships from the 1999). many focusing on one to a few elements in national laboratories. collaboration between private entities (e. however. Indeed.. given benefit could pull together the current expertise and the fact that the algal biofuels industry is still in its facilities. By focsuing these partnerships on pre- competitive research or critical problems shared by all Exhibit 11. Gallagher et al.S. More specifically. algal biofuels industry.. academia can be either public or private. the U. pre-revenue. public- private partnerships have the potential to accelerate Since the 1980s. Various models for such partnerships employed of a shared R&D objective.. but not necessarily producing transportation envisioned by the Council on Competitiveness (1996): biofuels from cultivated algal biomass at scale. has increasingly invoked commercialization of algal biofuel technology. Partnerships are defined as cooperative arrangements engaging companies. leading public-private partnerships not only for large-scale to rapid industry growth and a stable market. investment. and government programs aimed at public-private which can support a quickening pace of innovation.g. The the algal biofuels value chain.1 shows the potential benefits of for membership and intellectual property models.. increase the capital efficiency of commercial et al. in past efforts are discussed in the context of applicability to the algal biofuels challenge. also noted the unique partnership on sharing of knowledge and capabilities for mutual environment in algal biofuels development... Partnerships based participants.

because some awards are based on having solved the problem. where no single entity can address the complex research challenge. labor). of solicitations are system-oriented. Prize forums can also leverage reward money There are several forums for creating public-private from a variety of different funding sources (state and partnerships: federal government.. conferences. and demand that the winning team meet or exceed certain success Private Partnerships criteria. Partnerships are facilitated in than they can individually. 110 11. By maintaining an active directory. as common interest. they are often formed to serve no other purpose. • The benefits of partnership outweigh the cost Consortia and trade organizations are membership of collaboration. Implicit in the gained through openness toward new partnerships. Often these types develop and license technology with new partners.4 Partnership Challenges in the point at which new researchers can enter and where the Algal Biofuels Industry new thought or methodology is shared with the peers. or levels beyond the capability of any individual entity.g. 2008). and provide publicity • Networking events such as seminars and conferences and marketing toolsets for competitors to attract future • Team-oriented government solicitations investors. global problems.players (e. Such solicitations have Public-Private Partnerships the potential to accelerate technology development. However. industry would retain its collaborative research to tackle complex problems competitive edge. with the ultimate seminars can be important tools for creating a collaborative solution only as good as existing technology will allow. scientists and engineers can learn of new research. and potential partners can explore areas of mutual interest. Partnerships can bring together parties that have not organizations that promote a closed circle of partners who worked together before. be proportional to the value of the contribution. These events are often 11. and private investors) into a single competition. successful partnerships have have necessarily come together without a government- been identified to include the following attributes: funded solicitation. as well as a platform to share research. prizes have been offered by various for the advancement of technology and know-how to organizations to support solving critical. which could both be a benefit have worked together for many years may not generate (new complementary capability) and a challenge (the the new thinking and fresh approaches that could be understanding of how to work together). these environments through collaborations among • The benefits received from the partnership should the membership. Through these events.C Prize forums can pull together developed technology 11. technology scale-up and demonstration. non-profit foundations. consortia and trade organizations can also be an effective • The partnership should not openly conflict with the vehicle for researchers looking for a new approach or interest of other groups (Micheau. such forums may favor mature • Consortia and trade organizations technology in the final stages of development where the • Team-oriented prizes focus can be on assembly into a working system. national. including the development of biofuels. new partnership. However. This may result in the formation of teams of proposers 11. environment. while increasing the opportunity to through public-private partnerships.3 Forums for Public. these partnerships can • The partners collaborate on the basis of only be expected to last for the life of the project. these organizations provide for opportunity to facilitate deeper collaborations.2 Components of Successful in a project-level partnership. Government solicitations are also an option to promote regulatory issues. organizations that may provide an opportunity for • The partners can achieve more through collaboration lasting partnerships. which could allow In recent years. concept of collaborating on a common basis is the sharing of pre-competitive research results. Public-Private Partnerships   . and may compete poorly in this type of award. However. into a working system to solve a problem.B. particularly in instances in which the team would not At the highest level. Through their structure. Basic research and early stage technology with limited funding Networking events such as workshops.

This type of partnership would greatly accelerate semiconductors. Collaborative partnerships.).. value chain to address technical and non-technical needs. Also. in order to fully realize the potential key technological challenges must be addressed for of the algal biofuels industry. technology development. government solicitations. or trade organizations—can be an be the workhorse that generates labor for this new industry. lawyers. real estate developers. biofuels. Academia will competitions.Public-private partnerships—whether they As this industry expands. public-private partnerships the algal biofuels to become viable. it is useful to conceptualize Technology partnerships could be used for following the various models for public-private consortia in terms objectives: of the five attributes of successful partnerships within the context of particular scenarios (e.org/future-x-prizes/energy-and-environment C http://www. consortia. Doing so may help define the boundary problem(s) for focus by a public-private consortium • Share knowledge of algal cultivation and and bring clarity to the composition. How inclusive is the membership and utilization to advance fuel conversion to its industry (or segment thereof)? technologies toward marketable products • Technology Commercialization. this characteristics. The exhibit compares tested and scaled before full-scale deployment in the PPP models from five different industry sectors – field. algal oil extraction. collaborate on the development of dynamic and expected contributions of the membership. These include: are needed to engage field experts (e.) or an open access repository and collaborate on the end goals (specific intended use. events. it will need labor to run its are formed or sustained through networking operations. nanotechnology. These consortia require • Labor force and intellectual talent to draw upon.g. construction personnel. marketing • An open environment to share ideas and technology and public relations specialists. • Technology development in algal biology. economic. These PPP models are scaling barrier and the lack of private capital to conduct mentioned only to serve as examples of the four external such applied research. to road-test their technologies.2. particular algal • Share knowledge of existing algal strains through strain. and the most difficult to implement. 11. Public-Private Partnerships   111 . and academia. the established industry sectors represented by most B http://www. are needed to ensure that academia develops students capable of addressing the challenges industry faces As discussed in greater detail in this document.mitcep. develop new algae-based fuels and co-products.g. etc. Because the ecosystem in the algal type of partnership can help incentivize commercial biofuels industry is unique and differs greatly from investment of similar full-scale algal operations. 2009). performance aspects of development of new natural or GMO algal strains the fuel. conversion process. particularly between industry and public-policy and regulatory challenges. dewatering pathway. etc. collaborative consortia for technology development are • The generation of basic methods and standards. effective way to address technological. Is it structured to develop and commercialize new technology? In the biofuels industry. algal growth and harvesting.org/ 11. and fuel conversion. requirements. prize and innovate new cost-cutting measures.xprize. Does it seek to grow the industry? laboratory have traditionally not translated well to the • Shared Investment. facilities could allow for new technologies to be road- as illustrated in Exhibit 11. technologies developed in the • Industry Growth. monitoring of growth operations • Collaborate on the development of technologies Considering the following four external characteristics for biomass harvesting and extraction of can help evaluate consortia models: algal components from the biomass • Share knowledge of fuel requirements • Openness. By reducing scaling risks. distributors) across the across the entire algal biofuels value chain. overcoming the lab-field and information technology. several in algal biofuels. Does it share investment equitably? field (Willems. Algal biofuels will likely face similar issues since natural environmental constraints Different consortia models exist and it is possible to could have a significant impact on algal productivity. all of the key attributes for successful partnerships noted earlier.5 Modeling Partnerships for • Pre-commercial-scale user facilities that are Technology Development accessible to researchers and developers Of the different forums for public-private partnerships. A compare some of these existing public-private consortia public-private partnership for pre-commercial-scale user models against these four external characteristics. aviation. Therefore..

this industry may find that no specific model will meet all of its needs. it could be helpful to consider these attributes and models. and determine how to best adapt / implement these attributes.models presented.2 Comparison of Some Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Models TECHNOLOGY SHARED INDUSTRY FOCUS ENTITY TYPE OPENNESS OF PPP INDUSTRY GROWTH COMMERCIALIZATION INVESTMENT • Collaborate on pre-competitive R&D • Designed selected by membership to increase competitiveness of • Transfer of technology by existing US firms in publication or member- marketplace • Open membership website data transfer • Provides • Cost-shared Non-Profit • Represent • Technology further commercialization by government Corporation industry interests developed to manufacturing network that and industry at Semiconductors (501c6) with • Forums inspiring solutions with external drives economic start-up physical cross collaboration partners. coordinated royalty-free license to industry roadmap to members focus R&D and spur • PPP can also license IP to on economic growth third parties • R&D conducted at Research • Address game. However. Public-Private Partnerships   . • Government Government Centers or partner facilities changing. high-risk Agency • Partners with barriers through funding Research industry and • Industry partners to targeted R&D • State funding Centers universities commercialize developed IP • Industry growth • Financial and Biofuels (not a • Public conferences • IP licensed to interested supported through other resources separate legal and workshops parties with an evaluation education from national entity with of commercialization labs • Opportunities for potential • Limited industry employees) collaboration involvement to • Transfer of technology by address issues on publication industry growth 112 11. then adopted development • Now funded facilities amongst members • PPP owns created IP and • Develops solely by industry • Public conferences provides non-exclusive. for an algal biofuels public-private consortium to meet its specific mission successfully. Exhibit 11. discuss and debate the merits of each.

non-exclusively general aviation funding for over 8 with NASA • Consortium of • Commercialization afforded market. including years Aviation & FAA (not a industry. royalty. only licensed to member financial • PPP provides non-exclusive. • Technology • Founding universities physical technical. • No federal amongst committee to with employees royalty basis as needed to funding researchers from address issues on achieve the widest possible universities and industry growth dissemination. • Industry growth funding for over 5 • Research conducted by Corporation • Technical through education years national labs and member Nanotechnology (501c6) with workshops. businesses of years employees exclusively to each other • Significant industry royalty-free involvement • Transfer of technology by provides market publication. TECHNOLOGY SHARED INDUSTRY FOCUS ENTITY TYPE OPENNESS OF PPP INDUSTRY GROWTH COMMERCIALIZATION INVESTMENT • Open membership • Consortium of industry. Public-Private Partnerships   113 . and members commitment for paid-up license to industry social issues over 3 years members inspire cross collaboration amongst members • Collaborative research amongst consortium • Technology members designed development and to reduce technical. • Industry gifts collaboration through Advisory legal entity free basis or exclusively. companies 11. facilities business. and regulatory designed to reduce bottlenecks operational costs Industry • IP licensed exclusively or and increase • Government consortium • Open membership. and transfer focus and of knowledge through commercialization member-only database network • Donor-driven • Research conducted by model • Industry growth university • Industry and supported through University • Software is open source • State funding university partners education of California licensed over 4 years Information • Numerous forums • Limited industry Institute • Other IP is either licensed • University funds Technology Research inspiring cross involvement (not a separate non-exclusively. academic as members agree to cross large established • Industry match separate legal and government license background and firms and small for same number entity with partners newly developed IP non. standardization operational. academic • Pre-competitive research and national lab • Government selected by all members Non-Profit partners.

N. Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. D.. and Wallsten. (2001). Levine. P. D. Holdren. 31. Gallagher.. K. (2001). Washington: U. 1459-1466. Public-private policy partnerships. Council on Competitiveness. 145-158.N. (2006).V. J.J. Energy-technology innovation. 31. Energy Policy. (2002). S. The MIT Press. Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. (ed). W. Public-Private Partnerships   .S.D. M. A. and Sagar. limited resources. 1179-1196. Link. M.A.A. An analysis of public initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. A.S. Brown. Science. D. P. and Siegel.. Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitflass.D. Research Policy.T.P. 1197-1207.. 29(14). J. 114 11. and Koomey J. The biofuels landscape through the lens of industrial chemistry. Short. Endless frontiers.G.. (2000).S. 325(5941).References Audretsch. Link. J. 193-237. (2009).. Willem. (1996).B.E. 29(14). Energy Policy. and Scott. (2002). In Rosenau. Paton. Brown... Stiglitz. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 31(1). Scenarios for a clean energy future. 707-708. Research Policy. M.A. R&D Policy for Competitiveness. A..

Appendices Appendix 1 : Workshop Participants Walter Adey Smithsonian Institution John Aikens Lybradyn Mark Allen A2be Carbon Capture Gennady Ananyev Princeton Alex Aravanis Sapphire Energy Ed Archuleta El Paso Water Utilities Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency Ricardo Arjona Abengoa Bioenergy Virginia Armbrust University of Washington Bob Avant Texas A&M Tom Avedisian U. Department of Energy Biomass Program Leslie Bebout NASA Ames Research Center Lucie Bednarova General Motors Amha Belay Earthrise Nutritionals John Benemann Benemann Associates Linda Benjamin Food and Drug Administration Christoph Benning Michigan State Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya.S. Department of Agriculture Doug Borger Lockheed Martin John Bouterse Envo Smart Sara Boyd BCS. Lauder School of Government.S.S. Diplomacy Isaac Berzin And Strategy Catalino Blanche U. Inc. Department of Energy David Bayless Ohio University Jacques Beaudry-Losique U. Andrew Braff Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Jim Brainard National Renewable Energy Laboratory Jerry Brand University of Texas at Austin Tom Brennan Arch Ventures Michael Briggs University of New Hampshire Jim Bristow Joint Genome Institute Kevin Brown - Malcolm Brown University of Texas at Austin Nathan Brown Federal Aviation Administration (Office of Environment And Energy) Kent Bryan City of Celina 115 Appendices   .

Biomass Program Daniel Fishman BCS.S.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program Michel Delafontaine Hawaii Biocrude Gregg Deluga General Electric Global Research Harrison Dillon Solazyme Dan Drell Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research Donn Dresselhuys Old Dominion University Bruce Eldridge University of Texas at Austin Tj Evens U. Department of Energy. Todd French Mississippi State Christian Fritsen Desert Research Institute Matthew Frome Solozyme Maria Ghirardi National Renewable Energy Laboratory Appendices   116 . Department of Agriculture Heriberto Cerutti University of Nebraska . Inc.Lincoln Alice Chen Environmental Protection Agency Parag Chitnis National Science Foundation Daniel Cicero National Energy Technology Laboratory Mike Cleary National Renewable Energy Laboratory John Coleman Algenol Jim Cook Univenture Doris Cooksey CPS Energy Keith Cooksey Montana State University Michael Cooney University of Hawaii – Manoa David Daggett Boeing Al Darzins National Renewable Energy Laboratory K. Das University of Georgia John Datko Air Force Office of Scientific Research Chris Davies Independence Bioproducts Brian Davison Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mark Decot U.C.William Buchan NASA Ames Research Center Jay Burns Bionavitas Arthur Butcher CPS Energy Thomas Byrne Byrne & Co Martin Carrera BP Matt Caspari Aurora Biofuels Chris Cassidy U.S.S. Department of Agriculture Paul Falkowski Rutgers University John Ferrell U.

S.S. Department of Energy.Warren Gillette Federal Aviation Administration (Office of Environment And Energy) Jim Gillingham Valero Dan Ginosar Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Robert Glass Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Steven Gluck Dow Chemical Steve Gorin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy. Department of Agriculture Ed Hogan Natural Resources Canada John Hogan NASA Ames Research Center John Holladay Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 117 Appendices   .S.S. Biomass Program Suzanne Goss Jacksonville Electric Authority Paul Grabowski U. LLC Arthur Grossman Stanford Guritno “Guri” Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Molly Hames U. Department of Energy Biomass Program Laurel Harmon UOP Deanna Hatch Organofuels Incorporated Pat Hatcher Old Dominion University David Hazlebeck General Atomics Bob Hebner University of Texas at Austin Grant Heffelfinger Sandia National Laboratories Erik Helm Environmental Protection Agency William Henley Oklahoma State Doug Henston Solix Biofuels Jurg Heuberger County of Imperial Kevin Hicks U. Biomass Program Michael Graves University of Massachusetts Bailey Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Eli Greenbaum Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nathanael Greene Natural Resources Defense Council Michael Gregoire U.S. Department of Energy. Department of Agriculture Tom Gross If. Golden Field Office Anders Handlos Grauslund Novozymes Zia Haq U. Department of Agriculture Mark Hildebrand Scripps Institute Masahito Hiratake Mitsubishi International Kent Hoekman Desert Research Institute Neil Hoffman U.S.

C. Hunter-Cevera University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute Mark Huntley University of Hawaii Stephen J. LLC J.S. Miller Chevron Chevron Gil Jackson United States Agency for International Development Jacob Jacobson Idaho National Laboratory Robert Jagusch Minnesota Muncipal Utilitees Association Eric Jarvis National Renewable Energy Laboratory Jeff Jeter Honda Libby Jewett National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration James “Jim” Sears A2be Carbon Capture Michael Johnson Massachusetts Institute of Technology Glen Kertz Valcent Alex Kinnier Khosla Ventures Douglas Kirkpatrick Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Melissa Klembara U. Department of Energy Biomass Program Geetha Kothandaraman ConocoPhillips Walt Kozumbo Air Force Office of Scientific Research Heidi Kuehnle Kuehnle Agrosystems Peter Lammers New Mexico State University Cynthia Lane American Water Works Association Todd Lane Sandia National Laboratories Mario Larach Kai Bioenergy Corp. Rachel Lattimore Arent Fox LLP Edward Laws University of Hawaii at Monoa Gordon Leblanc Petrosun Joo-Youp Lee University of Cincinnati Paul Lefebvre University of Minnesota James Lester Stratus Consulting Jack Lewnard Gas Technology Institute Casey Lippmeier Martek Kent Lohman Midwest Research Institute Tryg Lundquist California Polytechnic State University Appendices   118 .Andy Horne Natural Resources Development Jeff Houff Hydrogeologic. Inc Qiang Hu Arizona State University Neil Huber Army Michael Huesemann Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Peter Hug Recombinant Innovation.

Shell Global Solutions Inc. Mayfield Scripps Research Institute Mike Pacheco National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Panesgrau National Renewable Energy Laboratory Frank Parker Organofuels Incorporated Helen Parker Algaelink.S.V.S. Kenneth Moss Environmental Protection Agency Chuck Mueller Sandia National Laboratories Jeff Muhs Utah State University Walter Mulbry U. Department of Energy Lissa Morgenthaler-Jones Livefuels Jerry Morris Innovation/Biodomain . N. Department of Agriculture Alyson Myers Kegotank Biofuels Nick Nagle National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Nobles University of Texas at Austin Charley O’kelly Blue Marble Energy Lou Ogaard CEHMM Kelly Ogilvie Blue Marble Energy John Ohlrogge Michigan State University Jose Olivares Los Alamos National Laboratory Phil Ovitt Senator Brownback Office George Oyler Johns Hopkins University Stephen P.John Magnuson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Len Malczynski Sandia National Laboratories Mike Manella ADM Russell Martin Blue Source Anthony Martino Sandia National Laboratories Margaret McCormick Targeted Growth Patrick McGinn National Research Council John McGowen Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University Diane McKnight University of Colorado-Boulder Steve Meller Procter & Gamble Omar Mendoza United States Air Force Walter Messier Evolutionary Genomics Blaine Metting Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory Greg Mitchell Scripps Institution of Oceanography John Mizroch U. Roberta Parry Environmental Protection Agency 119 Appendices   .

Department of Energy. Department of Energy. LLC John Robbins Exxonmobil Paul Roessler Synthetic Genomics Roger Ruan University of Minnesota Jim Ryan MOR Supercritical.S.Ron Pate Sandia National Laboratories Leslie Pezzullo U. Biomass Program Ron Reinsfelder Shell Global Solutions Bruce Resnick Cargill Curt Rich Van Ness Feldman Mark Riedy Andrews Kurth Kathy Roach MurphyTate. LLC Gerson Santos-Leon Abengoa Bioenergy Richard Sayre Donald Danforth Plant Science Center Philippe Schild European Commission Gerald Seeley Old Dominion University/Company Mark Segal Environmental Protection Agency Mike Seibert National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joel Serface Kleiner Perkins Appendices   120 . Biomass Program Schild Philippe European Commission Philip Pienkos National Renewable Energy Laboratory Maria Piera Abengoa Bioenergy John Pierce Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Daniel Pike AF Research Lab Jennifer Pinkerton LA Department of Water & Power Bradley Plantz University of Nebraska-Lincoln John Plaza John Plaza Robert Polak Phycal Juergen Polle Brooklyn College Matt Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Steve Potts EPA Office of Water Peter Pryfogle Idaho National Laboratory Steve Przesmitski National Renewable Energy Laboratory Theras Pugh American Public Power Association Ron Putt Auburn University Nigel Quinn Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kenneth Reardon Colorado State University Hal Reed American Water Valerie Reed U.S.

S. Jean Vandergheynst UC Davis Tom Verry National Biodiesel Board Sanjay Wagle Vantagepoint Venture Kevin Wanttaja Salt River Project Michael Webber The University of Texas at Austin Alan Weber Marc-IV Consulting Donald Weeks University of Nebraska . Department of Energy. Inc. LLC Tanja Shonkwiler Jamestown Ny (Outside Counsel) Blake Simmons Sandia National Laboratories Knut Simonsen DTE Energy Resources. Cai Steger Natural Resources Defense Council Dan Stepan Energy & Environmental Research Center Jake Stewart Organic Fuels Mark Stone Desert Research Institute Belinda Sturm Kansas University Transportation Research Institute Sidhu Sukh University of Dayton Xiaolei Sun Arizona Public Service Sam Tagore U. Biomass Program John Spear Colorado School of Mines Karl Stahlkopf Hawaiian Electric Company. Biomass Program Evonne Tang National Academy of Sciences Jeff Tester Massachusetts Institute of Technology Robert Thomas South Australia R&D Institute Jonathan Trent NASA Ames Research Center Pat Unkefer Los Alamos James Van Etten University of Nebraska Peter Van Den Dorpel Algaelink. Evan Smith The Verno Group Seth Snyder Argonne National Laboratory Milton Sommerfeld Arizona State University Glenn Sonntag U. Inc.Lincoln Alan Weimer University of Colorado at Boulder Zhiyou Wen Virginia Tech Norman Whitton Sunrise Ridge Algae 121 Appendices   .S. N.V.Pamela Serino Defense Energy Support Center Chris Shaddix Sandia National Laboratories Alex Shearer SRI International John Sheehan Sheehanboyce. Department of Energy.

Molly Hames U. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Grant Heffelfinger Sandia National Laboratories Mark Hildebrand Scripps Institution of Oceanography John Hogan NASA Ames Research Center Qiang Hu Arizona State University Michael Huesemann Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Eric Jarvis National Renewable Energy Laboratory Geoff Klise Sandia National Laboratories Alina Kulikowski-Tan Carbon Capture Corp Pete Lammers New Mexico State University Jared Largen BCS. Inc. Maria Ghirardi National Renewable Energy Laboratory Stephen Gorin National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tom Gross IF.S.S.Elizabeth Willet Mars Symbioscience Bryan Willson Colorado State University Byard Wood Utah State University Christopher Wood Platt River Power Authority David Woodbury Biofuel Producers of America (Bpa Paul Woods Algenol Ben Wu Livefuels Don Wyma National Intelligence Officer For Science And Technology Joyce Yang U. Department of Energy Biomass Program Chris Yeager Savannah River National Laboratory Ross Youngs Univenture Tim Zenk Sapphire Energy Zhenqi Zhu Stevens Institute of Technology Yonathan Zohar University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute Appendix 2: Contributors Jim Brainard National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tom Brennan Arch Ventures Bill Buchan NASA Ames Research Center Mike Cleary National Renewable Energy Laboratory Michael Cooney University of Hawaii – Manoa Al Darzins National Renewable Energy Laboratory Daniel Fishman BCS. Appendices   122 . LLC. Inc.

S. LLC. Department of Energy. Inc.S. Biomass Program Chuck Mueller Sandia National Laboratories Nick Nagle National Renewable Energy Laboratory Michael Pacheco National Renewable Energy Laboratory Ron Pate Sandia National Laboratory Leslie Pezzullo U. Guri Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Mike Seibert National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joel Serface Kleiner Perkins Chris Shaddix Sandia National Laboratories Blake Simmons Sandia National Laboratories Amy Sun Sandia National Laboratories Joyce Yang U.S.Yantao Li Arizona State University Tryg Lundquist California Polytechnic State University Rajita Majumdar BCS. Department of Energy. Biomass Program 123 Appendices   . Len Malcynski Sandia National Laboratories Tony Martino National Renewable Energy Laboratory Steve Mayfield Scripps Institution of Oceanography Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory Joanne Morello U. Biomass Program Philip Pienkos National Renewable Energy Laboratory Juergen Polle Brooklyn College Matthew Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Ron Putt Auburn University Kathy Roach MurphyTate. Department of Energy.

Inc. 2) General Systems Research LLC Matthew Frome Solazyme Michael R. Wenbert The Eden Tube Project Norman M. Algal Farms Inc. Rittmann Arizona State University G. Dr. Stanford University Arthur Grossman (Adjunct Professor). Biotechnology Institute David L. Robert S Weber Sunrise Ridge Algae. Biodesign Institute. Inc. Shenderov BioLogical Technologies. School of Life Sciences Marc von Keitz and Steve Heilmann University of Minnesota. Solazyme (Chief of Genetics) Douglas Haughey not listed Joel E. Bob Avant et al Texas AM Halil Berberoglu University of Texas Shulin Chen et al Washington University Barry Cohen National Algae Association Anju Dahiya 1) The University of Vermont . Whitton. Paul Woods Algenol Xiaohan Yang Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tim Zenk Sapphire Energy Appendices   124 . Inc Matt Peak Prize Capital María Piera Alberola Abengoa Matthew Posewitz Colorado School of Mines Bruce Resnick Cargill Center for Environmental Biotechnology. LLC Carnegie Institution for Science (Staff member). Valentin Soloiu Georgia Southern University Lance Stokes ECI Environmental Compliance Jefferson Tester Cornell University Willem Vermaas Arizona State University. Gale PetroAlgae.Appendix 3: Respondents to Request for Information on the Draft Roadmap Daniel Angell TPA Inc. Mark Segal Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Alexander D. Roesijadi Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Mary Rosenthal Algal Biomass Organization Richard Sayre and Ursula Goodenough Donald Danforth Plant Science Center and Washington University Gerard Seeley Jr. Bruce E. Kostka Florida State University David Lewis The University of Adelaide Margaret McCormick Targeted Growth Lissa Morgenthaler-Jones LiveFuels. Dr.

.

gov .eere.energy. DOE/EE-0332 www.