2011 OPM SES Survey Results

Senior Executive Service
Survey Results for

Fiscal Year 2011
May 2012
a New Day for Federal Service
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................2
Background ....................................................................................................................................3
Overall Results ...............................................................................................................................3
Executive Development ...............................................................................................................5
Performance Management and Pay ..............................................................................................7
Recruitment and Appointment .....................................................................................................9
Demographics .............................................................................................................................11
Appendix 1: Survey Response Rates Per Agency .....................................................................15
Appendix 2: Survey Results Per Question Per Agency ............................................................16
Appendix 3: Governmentwide Survey Results Comparison 2008 to 2011 ...........................131
FY2011 SES Survey Results
Page 1
Executive Summary
In mid-2011, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) surveyed all career, non-career
and limited term Senior Executive Service (SES) members. 1 The survey was designed to gather
information about the strengths and challenges in the SES, from the perspective of its current
members, and received a 65% response rate from eligible executives.
The 2011 SES survey results indicate the following findings:
Pride in SES and Accountability for Results - An overwhelming majority of
executives: take pride in being members of the SES (94%); feel a great deal of personal
accomplishment (93%); and feel they are held accountable for achieving results (92%).
Long Career Tenure and Experience - A majority of the respondents: were appointed
to the SES from a Civil Service position (86%); have worked for the Federal Government
for more than 20 years (64%); have been an SES member for 1 to 10 years (72%); and
will be retiring within 1 to 5 years (57%).
Developmental Opportunities - The survey indicates the majority of executives feel
their developmental needs are met (70%) and take advantage of developmental
opportunities (77%). Significantly more executives in 2011 are engaging in a variety of
developmental activities compared to 2008, including a 360-type assessment (a 15%
increase), developmental advice from a mentor (a 9% increase) and formal executive
coaching (a 12% increase).
Continued Challenges in Dealing with Poor Performers - Respondents indicated they
feel agencies struggle to deal effectively with poor performing executives (only 28% feel
their agency deals effectively with executives who perform poorly).
Mixed Review of Pay for Performance - While most executives believe SES pay
should be based on performance (92%), a much smaller percentage of executives believe
pay for performance promotes better organizational performance (43%).
Decline in Satisfaction with Pay and Recognition - The percentage of positive
responses to questions regarding executive pay, awards, and recognition were
significantly lower in 2011 than in 2008, which is unsurprising given the Federal pay
freeze.
These findings capture some of the core strengths and challenges facing todays Senior
Executive Service. The Presidents Management Council and the Chief Human Capital Officers
Council launched an initiative in 2010 to further strengthen the SES, through which interagency
working groups identified potential improvements and created a range of projects to implement
those recommendations. In 2012, with these efforts fully in place, Federal agencies will continue
to address many of the issues identified in the 2011 SES survey to further enhance executive
recruitment, performance management, and career development.
1
Similar to the approach OPM took in administering the 2008 SES survey which may be
viewed on OPMs web site at http://www.opm.gov/surveys/results/index.asp OPM again
surveyed all career, non-career, and limited term SES members, this time as of March 31, 2011,
resulting in a total eligible sample size of 7,677. Administration of the survey began on August
10, 2011, and continued through September 9, 2011. A total of 4,954 respondents completed the
survey, for an overall response rate of 65 percent.
Page 2
Background
Purpose: The 2011 Senior Executive Service (SES) Survey was designed to support the
initiatives of the President's Management Council (PMC) focusing on revitalizing the SES corps
through improvements and innovations to the hiring, performance management, and career
development of SES members. The results of the 2011 SES survey will further inform efforts to
enhance the success of the SES.
The 2011 survey is a follow-up to the 2008 SES Survey, and includes many of the same
questions from the 2008 survey, in order to collect longitudinal data on key issues regarding the
SES (the results of the 2008 SES survey can be viewed on OPMs web site at
http://www.opm.gov/surveys/results/index.asp). The 2011 survey also includes a few additional
questions to obtain information relevant to current issues of emphasis, including areas on which
the PMC SES Initiative has focused.
Methodology: Similar to the 2008 survey, OPM surveyed all career, non-career, and limited
term SES members as of March 31, 2011. The SES survey was emailed to a total eligible sample
size of 7,677. Administration of the survey began on August 10, 2011, and continued through
September 9, 2011. A total of 4,954 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 65
percent. (See Appendix 1 for response rates per agency.)
Overall Results
Most favorable and unfavorable overall responses: Survey items with the most overall
favorable responses are as follows:
FY2011 Survey Questions

I am proud to be a member of the
Federal Governments Senior
Executive Service.
My work gives me a feeling of
Q.9
personal accomplishment.
I am held accountable for achieving
Q.47
results.
Q.60 Pay should be based on performance.
Q.7
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
94%
97%
93%
95%
92%
91%
92%
93%
Page 3
Survey questions with the least favorable responses are as follows:

SES pay and benefits are helpful in
Q.29 attracting high quality senior
executives.
Q.30 retaining high quality senior
executives.
Pay distinctions are meaningfully
Q.58
different among executives.
My position could be filled using just
executive core qualifications without
Q.71
requiring additional technical
qualifications.
*Not asked.
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
39%
50%
37%
N/A*
29%
26%
22%
N/A
Notable significant increases in favorable responses between 2008 and 2011 include the
following:
Career advancement depends on an employees willingness to change positions (a 44%
increase, Q.6).
More executives are interested in opportunities to network with other SES members
outside their agencies (a 12% increase, Q.8).
Developmental needs are assessed (a 14% increase, Q.19).
More executives are satisfied with the developmental opportunities they receive (a 7%
increase, Q.23).
More executives have received a 360-type assessment (a 15% increase, Q.24a), have had
developmental advice from a mentor (a 9% increase, Q.24c) and have received formal
executive coaching (a 12% increase, Q.24d).
More executives were given a summary of their agencies SES overall performance
ratings, performance awards and pay adjustments (a 12% increase, Q.51).
Performance awards are meaningfully different among executives (a 10% increase,
Q.59).
Notable decreases in favorable responses between 2008 and 2011 include the following:
More executives do not think SES pay and benefits are helpful in attracting high quality
senior executives (a 13% increase, Q. 29).
Fewer executives say they understand the SES performance appraisal system being used
in their organizations (a 6% increase, Q.33).
More executives respond that their salary increases are not linked, or are linked to a
limited extent, to their performance rating (a 29% increase, Q.43).
Page 4
More executives respond that their performance awards are not linked, or are linked to a
limited extent, to their performance ratings (a 12% increase, Q.44).
Fewer executives understand how their most recent salary increase was determined (7%
fewer, Q. 45).
Fewer executives received a copy of their agencys performance management system
(25% fewer, Q.49a) or of their agencys executive pay policy (40%, Q. 49b).
More executives disagree that their agencies deal effectively with executives who
perform poorly (a 10% increase, Q.52).
More executives do not think pay distinctions are meaningfully different among
executives (an 18% increase, Q.58) and more do not think performance awards are
meaningfully different (a 12% increase, Q.59).
Fewer executives are satisfied with the recognition they receive for doing a good job
(11% fewer, Q.63).
Fewer executives are satisfied with their pay (10% fewer, Q.64).
The remainder of this section provides additional information regarding the most favorable and
least favorable items by topic. Topics include executive development, performance management
and pay, recruitment and appointment, and demographic information.
Executive Development
Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing executive development issues that had the
most favorable responses are as follows:

In my organization, there are sufficient
funds available for my job-related
Q.18
development to maintain up-to-date
skills.
I take advantage of the developmental
Q.22
opportunities that are available to me.
How satisfied are you with the
Q.23 developmental opportunities you
receive?
My organization provides managers
Q.26 with the training needed to successfully
manage a diverse workforce.
Job changes improve senior executives
Q.65
performance.
Q.20 My developmental needs are met.
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
57%
50%
77%
N/A
62%
55%
65%
N/A
56%
55%
Percent Yes
70%
N/A
Page 5
Other favorable points of interest from the data include the following:
Respondents rated developmental assignments as the most effective developmental
activity (52% rated Very Effective), followed by residential executive development
programs (40%), having a mentor (36%), and receiving formal executive coaching
(32%).
The majority of new executives were satisfied with the support received by their agency
during their first 30 days as a new SES member (63.5%, Q.16), and more than half were
satisfied with their overall onboarding experience (56.6%, Q.17).
Least Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing executive development issues with
the lowest overall favorable responses are:
FY2011 Survey Questions (These questions were not
asked in the 2008 survey.)
Q.24i
Since becoming a member of the SES, have you

completed an Executive Development Plan? (Note:
this is required by regulation 5 CFR 412.401.)
Percent Yes
Responses
2011
48.2%
Percent Very or
Mostly Effective
2011
How effective was [completing an Executive

Development Plan (EDP)] for your continued
Q.25i development? (This question was answered by
only those responding yes to Q.24i (i.e., had
completed an EDP).)
How effective was [taking an online training
course] for your continued development? (This
Q.25k question was only answered by those who
answered yes to Q.24k (i.e., had taken an online
course since becoming an SES member))
39.3%
37.1%
Other unfavorable responses indicated in the data include:

Slightly more than one-quarter of executives reported their developmental needs are not
assessed (27.6%, Q.19), and about one-third indicated their developmental needs are not
met (30%, Q.20).
About one-quarter of new executives indicated they were dissatisfied with the training
and information received during their first 30 days as an SES member (24%, Q.15).
Additional Executive Development Items: About half of respondents agreed that their
developmental needs are assessed (48%, Q.19) which is an increase from 34% in 2008. In
addition, a majority reported that their developmental needs are met (70%, Q.20). The survey
Page 6
asked the executives responding that their developmental needs are not met to explain why
(Q. 21). The reason most often given was time inability to take time away from the job,
followed by budget lack of funding. The following shows the responses to this question:
FY2011 Survey Question:
My developmental needs are not being met
because of (These questions were only seen by
those who answered no to Q.20 (i.e., my
developmental needs are met) and were not asked
in 2008.)
Q.21a Lack of funding
Q.21b Inability to take time away from the job
Q.21c Lack of support from superiors
Q.21d Appropriate training not offered
Percent
Strongly Agree/Agree
2011
66%
70%
46%
42%
Executive Performance Management and Pay

Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing executive performance management and
pay issues that had the most favorable responses are as follows:
Q.33
Q.47
Q.60
I understand the SES performance

appraisal system being used in this
organization.
I am held accountable for achieving
results.
Pay for SES should be based on
performance.
FY2011 Survey Question

Q.36
I had a discussion about progress on

my performance plan at mid-year in
the performance cycle.
To what extent is your performance

Q37a rating based on the performance of
your organization?
Q37b rating based on your individual
performance?
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
77%
83%
92%
91%
92%
93%
Percent Yes
2011
Percent Yes
2008
79%
74%
Percent Very
Great
Extent/Great
Extent
2011
Percent Very
Great
Extent/Great
Extent
2008
68%
68%
77%
74%
Page 7
Least Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing executive performance management

and pay issues with the least favorable responses are as follows:
Have you received a copy of your
Q.49b agencys Executive Compensation Pay
Policy?
rating based on customer perspective?
Q.37d
rating based on employee perspective?
Q.37c

Q.52
Q.58
Q.62
My agency deals effectively with

executives who perform poorly.
Pay distinctions are meaningfully
In my agency, SES pay for
performance promotes better
organizational performance.
Percent Yes
2011
Percent Yes
2008
35%
40%
Percent
Great/Very Great
Extent
2011
Percent
Great/Very
Great Extent
2008
42%
43%
28%
28%
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
28%
26%
29%
26%
43%
43%
Page 8
Recruitment and Appointment

The majority of SES members were appointed to their position from a Civil Service position
(86%, Q.2). Only 15% of current SES members were recruited from the private sector or
military.
Most Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing recruitment and appointment issues
that had the most favorable responses are as follows:

My agency is able to attract high quality
senior executives.
Senior executives should be able to
Q.66 perform successfully in a wide range of
career positions.
The five executive core qualifications
(Leading People, Leading Change,
Results Driven, Building Coalitions, and
Q.68
Business Acumen) represent the critical
skills needed by SES to succeed in
performing their roles as Federal leaders.
As a job seeker, I would prefer to use a
resume to apply for SES jobs instead of
Q.69
submitting executive core qualifications
statements.
Q.27
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
69.8%
66%
88.7%
77%
74.8%
N/A
63.7%
N/A
Page 9
Least Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing recruitment and appointment issues
that had the least favorable responses are as follows:

Q.29 attracting high quality senior
executives.
My position could be filled using
just executive core qualifications
Q.71
without requiring additional
technical qualifications.
The OPM Qualifications Review
Board (QRB) certification process
Q.74 helps ensure that the person selected
for an SES position is a good
leader.
Q.72
I have served on an OPM convened

QRB.
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2011
Percent Strongly
Agree/Agree
2008
38.5%
50%
22%
N/A
46%
N/A
Percent Yes
2011
Percent Yes
2008
27.3%
N/A
Most of the recruitment and appointment survey questions were new to the 2011 SES survey, so
comparison data with the 2008 survey is limited. The most significant difference between 2008
and 2011 recruitment and appointment questions showed an increase of 3.3 percent of SES
members reported they had been a member of the SES for less than one year (Q.3).
Page 10
Demographics
The majority of SES respondents are between 50 and 59 years of age (52%, Q.79). The majority
of SES respondents have been with the Federal Government (excluding military service) for
more than 20 years (64%, Q.78). Fifty-four percent of career respondents have less than 6 years
in the SES and about a third have less than 4 years (32%, Q.3).
Expected turnover in SES ranks. The survey indicates the likelihood of high turnover among
the senior ranks in the near future. Thirty-six percent of career respondents plan to leave in the
next three years, and 56 percent plan to leave in the next five years (Q.80).
Page 11
Nature of Work. The majority of SES respondents reported they consider 46 percent or more of
their current work to be leadership or managerial in nature (53%, Q.77b). Only a quarter of the
respondents consider their work to be more than 45% technical/professional nature (Q.77a). The
majority) of SES respondents manage 1 to 200 employees (67%, Q.75). Over 44 percent of
executives manage a total budget of $1 million to $100 million (Q.76).
Page 12
Mobility of SES Members. The following three charts show that most SES members have not
changed jobs either within or outside their agencies since becoming an SES. In addition, the
survey indicates SES members moved more often to different jobs and/or locations before they
became SES members than after becoming SES members (Q4. and Q.5). The charts also show
that changes in job occur mostly within an agency (rather than by changing agencies) (Q.4 and
Q.5).
Page 13
Page 14
Appendix 1: Survey Response Rates Per Agency
Agency
Agriculture
Agency for International
Development
Commerce
Defense/Air Force
Defense/Army
Defense/Navy
Defense/All Other
Education
Energy
Environmental Protection Agency
General Services Administration
Health and Human Services
Homeland Security
Housing and Urban Development
Interior
Justice
Labor
NASA
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
National Science Foundation
Office of Management and Budget
Office of Personnel Management
Small Business Administration
Social Security Administration
State
Transportation
Treasury
Veterans Affairs
All Other Agencies
Total
Number of
Respondents
239
Eligible
Population*
336
Response
Rate
71%
21
32
66%
241
120
149
189
264
60
286
187
75
253
334
61
170
414
113
297
120
54
26
47
30
128
100
158
334
216
268
4,954
367
179
283
338
491
80
433
283
96
440
498
99
262
717
170
443
159
80
67
58
53
149
172
211
459
335
387
7,677
66%
67%
53%
56%
54%
75%
66%
66%
78%
58%
67%
62%
65%
58%
66%
67%
75%
68%
39%
81%
57%
86%
58%
75%
73%
64%
69%
65%
*The eligible population includes executives as of March 31, 2011, with a valid email address
who had not retired or relocated when the survey was administered.
Page 15
Appendix 2: Survey Results Per Question Per Agency
Agency
Q1 What type of appointment do you hold?

Limited Term
Total # of
or Limited
Respondents
Career
Non-Career
Emergency
Broadcasting Board of Governors

Department of Agriculture
Department of Commerce
11
239
241
90.9%
90.8%
93.8%
9.1%
8.8%
5.4%
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
OSD, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, and

DoD Field Activities
Department of Education
Department of Energy
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Homeland Security
264
60
286
252
334
92.0%
85.0%
94.8%
91.7%
91.3%
6.8%
15.0%
4.5%
7.1%
6.9%
1.1%
0.0%
0.7%
1.2%
1.8%
Department of Housing and Urban

Development
Department of Justice
Department of Labor
Department of State
Department of the Air Force
Department of the Army
Department of the Interior
Department of the Navy
Department of the Treasury
Department of Transportation
Department of Veterans Affairs
61
413
113
100
120
149
170
189
334
158
216
187
93.4%
94.4%
85.8%
88.0%
97.5%
98.0%
90.6%
97.9%
97.3%
88.6%
97.7%
92.0%
6.6%
5.1%
11.5%
7.0%
2.5%
1.3%
7.6%
2.1%
1.5%
10.8%
1.9%
5.9%
0.0%
0.5%
2.7%
5.0%
0.0%
0.7%
1.8%
0.0%
1.2%
0.6%
0.5%
2.1%
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Federal Communications Commission
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Federal Trade Commission
Merit Systems Protection Board
21
19
11
31
75
12
90.5%
94.7%
100.0%
80.6%
92.0%
83.3%
9.5%
5.3%
0.0%
16.1%
8.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
National Aeronautics and Space

Administration
297
97.3%
0.7%
2.0%
National Archives and Records

Administration
13
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
National Foundation on the Arts and

Humanities
National Labor Relations Board
National Transportation Safety Board
U.S. Agency for International Development
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
21
93.8%
92.1%
87.0%
83.3%
100.0%
84.6%
85.1%
86.7%
96.1%
85.7%
6.3%
7.9%
1.9%
8.3%
0.0%
11.5%
8.5%
13.3%
3.1%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
8.3%
0.0%
3.8%
6.4%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
SES wide
4952
93.4%
5.4%
1.2%
Page 16
Agency
Q2 How were you appointed to the SES?

From a
Following
civil
From the
retirement
Total # of
service
private
from military
Respondents
position
sector
service

OSD, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, and DoD
Field Activities
11
237
240
54.5%
86.1%
82.1%
45.5%
13.5%
15.0%
0.0%
0.4%
2.9%
263
59
284
74.5%
86.4%
81.0%
15.2%
11.9%
13.4%
10.3%
1.7%
5.6%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Archives and Records Administration
Humanities
252
331
79.4%
88.2%
19.0%
9.1%
1.6%
2.7%
61
409
111
100
120
149
167
189
333
157
214
184
21
19
11
31
75
12
295
13
78.7%
92.2%
81.1%
88.0%
71.7%
79.2%
86.8%
85.7%
88.0%
81.5%
89.3%
92.4%
85.7%
73.7%
90.9%
90.3%
85.3%
83.3%
87.8%
92.3%
21.3%
7.6%
18.9%
11.0%
10.8%
7.4%
13.2%
7.4%
11.4%
17.8%
7.5%
7.6%
9.5%
26.3%
9.1%
9.7%
13.3%
16.7%
8.5%
7.7%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.0%
17.5%
13.4%
0.0%
6.9%
0.6%
0.6%
3.3%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
3.7%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
46
30
128
21
93.8%
97.4%
90.7%
91.7%
99.2%
88.5%
78.3%
70.0%
97.7%
85.7%
6.3%
2.6%
9.3%
8.3%
0.8%
11.5%
21.7%
30.0%
2.3%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SES wide
4923
85.6%
11.4%
2.9%
Page 17
Agency
Q3 How long have you been a member of the SES?

Less
Total # of
1 to 3 4 to 5
6 to 10 11 to 20
than 1
Respondents
year
years years
years
years
More
than 20
years

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
238
241
9.1%
6.3%
7.9%
36.4%
27.3%
26.6%
9.1%
17.6%
17.4%
36.4%
27.3%
27.8%
9.1%
18.1%
13.7%
0.0%
3.4%
6.6%
264
60
286
253
334
6.1%
10.0%
7.0%
7.5%
10.5%
32.6%
23.3%
25.2%
28.1%
35.0%
19.7%
11.7%
27.3%
25.3%
26.6%
22.0%
25.0%
18.5%
20.9%
18.0%
16.7%
23.3%
19.6%
16.6%
9.3%
3.0%
6.7%
2.4%
1.6%
0.6%
61
413
112
100
120
149
170
189
334
158
214
187
21
19
11
31
75
12
6.6%
8.2%
8.0%
8.0%
6.7%
10.7%
8.8%
2.1%
8.1%
11.4%
8.4%
7.5%
9.5%
21.1%
18.2%
3.2%
16.0%
0.0%
26.2%
33.2%
27.7%
30.0%
36.7%
29.5%
28.2%
24.3%
25.1%
32.3%
29.0%
18.2%
23.8%
21.1%
45.5%
25.8%
29.3%
25.0%
19.7%
22.8%
10.7%
14.0%
19.2%
24.2%
17.6%
21.2%
20.1%
17.7%
21.0%
11.2%
4.8%
15.8%
0.0%
16.1%
25.3%
16.7%
23.0%
24.2%
26.8%
16.0%
20.8%
27.5%
23.5%
31.7%
27.2%
16.5%
16.8%
26.7%
19.0%
15.8%
0.0%
19.4%
14.7%
41.7%
21.3%
9.0%
17.9%
25.0%
14.2%
6.0%
17.1%
15.3%
16.8%
17.1%
18.7%
26.7%
28.6%
10.5%
18.2%
22.6%
14.7%
8.3%
3.3%
2.7%
8.9%
7.0%
2.5%
2.0%
4.7%
5.3%
2.7%
5.1%
6.1%
9.6%
14.3%
15.8%
18.2%
12.9%
0.0%
8.3%
297
4.4%
22.9%
22.2%
30.6%
16.5%
3.4%
13
7.7%
30.8%
23.1%
23.1%
7.7%
7.7%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
21
6.3%
5.3%
11.1%
8.3%
3.3%
3.8%
8.5%
6.7%
3.9%
0.0%
31.3%
18.4%
18.5%
33.3%
25.8%
30.8%
27.7%
33.3%
39.8%
52.4%
6.3%
10.5%
13.0%
25.0%
19.2%
26.9%
31.9%
3.3%
15.6%
19.0%
12.5%
23.7%
24.1%
16.7%
26.7%
19.2%
12.8%
23.3%
22.7%
23.8%
37.5%
26.3%
20.4%
16.7%
15.0%
19.2%
17.0%
26.7%
16.4%
4.8%
6.3%
15.8%
13.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2.1%
6.7%
1.6%
0.0%
SES wide
4949
7.5%
28.6%
20.0%
23.4%
16.2%
4.3%
Page 18
Q4a Prior to becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed jobs within your agency?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

Field Activities
10
227
236
50.0%
22.0%
28.4%
0.0%
25.6%
25.0%
30.0%
26.0%
33.5%
20.0%
26.4%
13.1%
250
25.6%
20.4%
26.4%
27.6%
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
59
279
241
324
59
410
113
97
117
147
165
187
330
153
214
184
20.3%
19.4%
21.6%
21.6%
18.6%
17.6%
23.0%
22.7%
6.8%
4.1%
24.2%
9.6%
17.9%
25.5%
14.5%
9.8%
32.2%
20.1%
27.4%
22.5%
25.4%
22.0%
20.4%
25.8%
7.7%
20.4%
14.5%
16.6%
15.5%
34.0%
13.1%
16.8%
35.6%
37.3%
36.9%
26.5%
32.2%
32.7%
44.2%
32.0%
19.7%
32.7%
37.6%
32.1%
26.4%
27.5%
27.1%
47.8%
11.9%
23.3%
14.1%
29.3%
23.7%
27.8%
12.4%
19.6%
65.8%
42.9%
23.6%
41.7%
40.3%
13.1%
45.3%
25.5%

National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities
20
19
10
31
72
12
292
13
15
38
53
11
120
25
47
28
127
20
40.0%
15.8%
20.0%
12.9%
18.1%
41.7%
15.1%
46.2%
40.0%
10.5%
26.4%
36.4%
5.8%
20.0%
27.7%
42.9%
9.4%
30.0%
10.0%
42.1%
50.0%
29.0%
18.1%
33.3%
13.4%
7.7%
20.0%
18.4%
47.2%
18.2%
10.0%
56.0%
17.0%
7.1%
18.1%
20.0%
50.0%
31.6%
20.0%
58.1%
25.0%
25.0%
40.8%
30.8%
33.3%
60.5%
17.0%
45.5%
38.3%
20.0%
27.7%
35.7%
23.6%
15.0%
0.0%
10.5%
10.0%
0.0%
38.9%
0.0%
30.8%
15.4%
6.7%
10.5%
9.4%
0.0%
45.8%
4.0%
27.7%
14.3%
48.8%
35.0%
SES wide
4837
18.8%
20.7%
32.3%
28.1%
Agency
Page 19
Q4b Prior to becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed jobs to work in a different organization or
agency?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

Field Activities
11
227
227
18.2%
41.0%
44.1%
27.3%
29.1%
30.4%
45.5%
22.5%
18.9%
9.1%
7.5%
6.6%
253
58
267
236
323
56
32.8%
31.0%
31.8%
39.0%
38.7%
37.5%
27.3%
32.8%
33.0%
33.9%
33.1%
21.4%
22.9%
31.0%
25.5%
18.6%
21.4%
30.4%
17.0%
5.2%
9.7%
8.5%
6.8%
10.7%
Department of Labor
Department of State
382
107
88
116
145
163
179
327
149
201
180
19
65.7%
42.1%
38.6%
30.2%
27.6%
34.4%
39.7%
48.6%
32.9%
62.7%
34.4%
31.6%
20.4%
29.9%
33.0%
28.4%
32.4%
36.8%
36.9%
27.5%
38.9%
15.4%
33.9%
26.3%
10.7%
23.4%
25.0%
21.6%
22.8%
22.7%
16.8%
19.0%
21.5%
16.9%
27.2%
36.8%
3.1%
4.7%
3.4%
19.8%
17.2%
6.1%
6.7%
4.9%
6.7%
5.0%
4.4%
5.3%

19
11
30
74
12
285
13
15
34
49
11
114
31.6%
27.3%
33.3%
35.1%
33.3%
30.5%
38.5%
40.0%
76.5%
30.6%
18.2%
38.6%
26.3%
45.5%
33.3%
24.3%
41.7%
33.7%
38.5%
26.7%
17.6%
42.9%
36.4%
36.8%
26.3%
27.3%
30.0%
24.3%
16.7%
29.1%
15.4%
20.0%
5.9%
22.4%
36.4%
16.7%
15.8%
0.0%
3.3%
16.2%
8.3%
6.7%
7.7%
13.3%
0.0%
4.1%
9.1%
7.9%

24
46
28
124
21
37.5%
15.2%
28.6%
59.7%
23.8%
45.8%
47.8%
17.9%
22.6%
38.1%
16.7%
32.6%
32.1%
12.9%
33.3%
0.0%
4.3%
21.4%
4.8%
4.8%
SES wide
4704
40.8%
30.3%
21.3%
7.6%
Agency
Page 20
Q4c Prior to becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed geographic locations?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

Field Activities
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
223
228
54.5%
32.3%
57.9%
18.2%
29.6%
25.4%
27.3%
22.9%
10.1%
0.0%
15.2%
6.6%
249
58
269
236
324
57
390
108
87
36.5%
60.3%
44.2%
51.7%
32.7%
50.9%
33.1%
47.2%
56.3%
20.1%
27.6%
29.4%
29.2%
24.1%
22.8%
15.9%
27.8%
24.1%
18.5%
10.3%
17.1%
14.8%
28.1%
15.8%
23.3%
20.4%
14.9%
24.9%
1.7%
9.3%
4.2%
15.1%
10.5%
27.7%
4.6%
4.6%

117
147
160
178
324
148
207
180
20
19
11
30
12.0%
30.6%
31.9%
36.5%
40.4%
43.2%
23.7%
53.9%
30.0%
78.9%
36.4%
73.3%
22.2%
20.4%
25.0%
34.3%
25.0%
25.0%
16.4%
31.1%
35.0%
10.5%
45.5%
20.0%
24.8%
20.4%
26.3%
10.7%
24.7%
23.0%
28.5%
13.3%
30.0%
10.5%
18.2%
6.7%
41.0%
28.6%
16.9%
18.5%
9.9%
8.8%
31.4%
1.7%
5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

72
11
281
13
15
35
49
10
117
24
46
29
63.9%
45.5%
35.9%
53.8%
53.3%
51.4%
53.1%
60.0%
37.6%
91.7%
45.7%
37.9%
18.1%
27.3%
38.8%
15.4%
20.0%
28.6%
28.6%
30.0%
29.9%
8.3%
37.0%
34.5%
9.7%
27.3%
18.5%
30.8%
26.7%
17.1%
16.3%
10.0%
29.1%
0.0%
10.9%
20.7%
8.3%
0.0%
6.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
2.0%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
6.5%
6.9%

SES wide
123
20
4703
42.3%
50.0%
41.1%
30.9%
10.0%
25.6%
20.3%
35.0%
19.9%
6.5%
5.0%
13.4%
Agency
Page 21
Q5a Since becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed jobs within your agency?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

10
220
229
50.0%
50.0%
53.7%
30.0%
28.2%
27.1%
20.0%
13.6%
15.7%
0.0%
8.2%
3.5%

Field Activities
Department of Labor
Department of State
251
57
280
240
315
55
393
110
92
113
147
159
44.2%
56.1%
46.4%
61.3%
47.3%
45.5%
53.9%
61.8%
55.4%
40.7%
49.0%
45.3%
35.1%
24.6%
30.7%
25.4%
31.1%
23.6%
27.0%
20.9%
23.9%
33.6%
32.0%
28.9%
15.9%
17.5%
18.6%
11.3%
15.6%
20.0%
13.5%
13.6%
14.1%
18.6%
12.9%
20.1%
4.8%
1.8%
4.3%
2.1%
6.0%
10.9%
5.6%
3.6%
6.5%
7.1%
6.1%
5.7%

180
320
153
208
180
21
18
10
29
70
11
284
43.9%
35.9%
59.5%
47.1%
40.6%
57.1%
44.4%
90.0%
58.6%
58.6%
54.5%
37.3%
31.7%
29.7%
30.1%
30.8%
31.1%
9.5%
33.3%
10.0%
31.0%
27.1%
36.4%
29.6%
20.6%
27.5%
6.5%
15.9%
23.3%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
10.3%
11.4%
9.1%
25.0%
3.9%
6.9%
3.9%
6.3%
5.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
8.1%

SES wide
13
14
36
51
12
120
25
45
28
122
20
4720
53.8%
57.1%
58.3%
51.0%
58.3%
26.7%
68.0%
37.8%
42.9%
39.3%
35.0%
47.8%
30.8%
21.4%
22.2%
27.5%
41.7%
30.8%
28.0%
46.7%
28.6%
28.7%
55.0%
29.4%
0.0%
14.3%
16.7%
17.6%
0.0%
27.5%
4.0%
11.1%
17.9%
20.5%
5.0%
17.1%
15.4%
7.1%
2.8%
3.9%
0.0%
15.0%
0.0%
4.4%
10.7%
11.5%
5.0%
5.6%
Agency
Page 22
Q5b Since becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed jobs to work in a different organization or
agency?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

Field Activities
10
221
217
80.0%
81.0%
78.8%
20.0%
13.6%
15.7%
0.0%
4.5%
4.1%
0.0%
0.9%
1.4%
250
56
271
237
69.2%
71.4%
74.2%
84.4%
22.0%
21.4%
18.5%
13.9%
6.4%
7.1%
6.6%
1.3%
2.4%
0.0%
0.7%
0.4%

Department of Labor
Department of State
314
54
383
107
88
112
147
155
176
319
149
202
77.4%
72.2%
90.3%
73.8%
81.8%
68.8%
70.1%
77.4%
74.4%
77.7%
76.5%
84.2%
17.2%
14.8%
7.6%
18.7%
12.5%
27.7%
23.8%
19.4%
19.9%
15.4%
20.1%
11.9%
5.1%
9.3%
1.8%
6.5%
5.7%
3.6%
5.4%
2.6%
5.1%
6.3%
2.7%
2.5%
0.3%
3.7%
0.3%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
1.5%

176
20
18
11
29
70
11
280
13
14
34
46
74.4%
75.0%
77.8%
63.6%
75.9%
80.0%
72.7%
67.5%
100.0%
78.6%
94.1%
73.9%
20.5%
20.0%
22.2%
27.3%
17.2%
12.9%
27.3%
23.2%
0.0%
7.1%
2.9%
26.1%
4.0%
5.0%
0.0%
9.1%
6.9%
7.1%
0.0%
8.6%
0.0%
7.1%
2.9%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
11
116
25
45
27
119
20
4629
81.8%
68.1%
64.0%
64.4%
74.1%
84.0%
80.0%
77.3%
18.2%
22.4%
32.0%
31.1%
14.8%
15.1%
5.0%
17.3%
0.0%
6.9%
4.0%
4.4%
3.7%
0.0%
15.0%
4.6%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.4%
0.8%
0.0%
0.9%
Agency
Page 23
Q5c Since becoming a member of the SES, how many times

have you...Changed geographic locations?
Total # of
Respondents
1-2
3-5
6+

10
218
215
90.0%
74.3%
85.6%
10.0%
14.2%
13.5%
0.0%
6.9%
0.5%
0.0%
4.6%
0.5%

Field Activities
Department of Labor
243
56
273
237
314
54
379
107
76.1%
98.2%
79.9%
84.8%
74.2%
85.2%
65.2%
80.4%
16.0%
1.8%
14.3%
13.9%
17.8%
9.3%
20.1%
14.0%
4.9%
0.0%
4.8%
1.3%
5.1%
3.7%
9.2%
5.6%
2.9%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2.9%
1.9%
5.5%
0.0%
Department of State
87
113
148
156
174
316
150
208
175
20
18
10
87.4%
61.9%
65.5%
76.3%
81.0%
70.3%
85.3%
56.3%
79.4%
65.0%
94.4%
80.0%
6.9%
24.8%
27.0%
13.5%
15.5%
19.3%
9.3%
25.5%
18.3%
20.0%
5.6%
20.0%
4.6%
8.8%
4.7%
7.1%
3.4%
8.9%
3.3%
12.0%
2.3%
15.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
4.4%
2.7%
3.2%
0.0%
1.6%
2.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

29
68
12
278
13
14
34
45
11
115
24
45
96.6%
88.2%
83.3%
75.5%
76.9%
85.7%
88.2%
91.1%
100.0%
80.0%
100.0%
91.1%
3.4%
10.3%
8.3%
20.5%
7.7%
7.1%
11.8%
8.9%
0.0%
16.5%
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
1.5%
8.3%
3.6%
15.4%
7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2.2%

SES wide
27
120
19
4610
77.8%
70.0%
89.5%
76.6%
14.8%
20.8%
10.5%
16.2%
7.4%
5.8%
0.0%
5.1%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
2.1%
Agency
Page 24
Agency
Q6 Career advancement depends on an employee's willingness to

change positions.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Strongly
Agree nor
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

OSD, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies,
and DoD Field Activities
Department of Health and Human
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
239
240
27.3%
35.1%
26.3%
27.3%
42.3%
42.5%
45.5%
15.9%
19.2%
0.0%
5.9%
7.5%
0.0%
0.8%
4.6%
264
59
286
31.1%
28.8%
35.3%
39.4%
33.9%
39.5%
17.8%
22.0%
19.2%
9.1%
10.2%
4.9%
2.7%
5.1%
1.0%
253
334
26.5%
43.4%
39.5%
38.3%
23.7%
14.7%
7.1%
2.7%
3.2%
0.9%
61
413
113
100
120
149
170
189
334
158
34.4%
37.3%
25.7%
32.0%
49.2%
37.6%
41.2%
37.0%
44.0%
34.8%
26.2%
37.5%
40.7%
39.0%
38.3%
47.0%
39.4%
37.6%
35.3%
38.6%
24.6%
16.7%
24.8%
20.0%
9.2%
8.7%
15.3%
15.3%
14.7%
19.6%
11.5%
6.5%
4.4%
3.0%
2.5%
6.0%
2.4%
7.9%
3.6%
4.4%
3.3%
1.9%
4.4%
6.0%
0.8%
0.7%
1.8%
2.1%
2.4%
2.5%

Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
U.S. Agency for International
Development
SES wide
216
187
50.9%
31.0%
32.9%
44.4%
10.6%
11.2%
4.6%
10.7%
0.9%
2.7%
21
19
11
31
75
12
33.3%
15.8%
45.5%
25.8%
28.0%
33.3%
42.9%
31.6%
27.3%
38.7%
48.0%
50.0%
4.8%
42.1%
18.2%
16.1%
20.0%
16.7%
14.3%
10.5%
9.1%
19.4%
1.3%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
297
34.0%
41.1%
15.2%
7.1%
2.7%
13
23.1%
38.5%
30.8%
7.7%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
31.3%
28.9%
24.1%
33.3%
50.0%
15.4%
31.9%
30.0%
38.3%
50.0%
52.6%
42.6%
41.7%
35.0%
46.2%
36.2%
30.0%
38.3%
18.8%
10.5%
29.6%
16.7%
9.2%
23.1%
23.4%
40.0%
17.2%
0.0%
5.3%
3.7%
8.3%
5.8%
15.4%
6.4%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.8%
21
4951
28.6%
36.0%
47.6%
39.3%
23.8%
16.9%
0.0%
5.8%
0.0%
2.0%
Page 25
Agency
Q7 I am proud to be a member of the Federal Governments Senior

Executive Service.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
237
240
54.5%
60.8%
52.1%
45.5%
32.9%
36.3%
0.0%
5.1%
8.8%
0.0%
0.4%
2.1%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
264
60
286
253
332
65.9%
66.7%
57.7%
65.2%
69.3%
28.4%
30.0%
33.6%
29.6%
25.0%
2.7%
3.3%
7.0%
4.0%
3.9%
3.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.2%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
61
411
110
99
119
67.2%
71.3%
68.2%
66.7%
75.6%
23.0%
23.6%
24.5%
25.3%
21.8%
8.2%
3.9%
4.5%
8.1%
2.5%
0.0%
0.7%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.5%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
149
170
188
333
158
215
186
72.5%
69.4%
74.5%
62.8%
69.6%
66.0%
68.3%
24.2%
22.4%
19.1%
30.6%
25.9%
26.5%
24.7%
2.7%
5.9%
4.3%
5.1%
2.5%
5.1%
4.8%
0.7%
1.8%
2.1%
0.9%
1.3%
1.4%
1.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.9%
0.5%
21
19
11
31
74
12
57.1%
63.2%
72.7%
58.1%
56.8%
83.3%
23.8%
31.6%
18.2%
29.0%
37.8%
16.7%
9.5%
5.3%
9.1%
12.9%
4.1%
0.0%
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
296
65.2%
27.7%
5.1%
1.7%
0.3%
13
92.3%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
36
53
12
119
62.5%
41.7%
69.8%
50.0%
75.6%
31.3%
50.0%
26.4%
50.0%
21.8%
0.0%
8.3%
3.8%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
26
47
30
126
21
4928
42.3%
61.7%
76.7%
78.6%
71.4%
66.0%
53.8%
31.9%
13.3%
17.5%
19.0%
27.6%
3.8%
2.1%
6.7%
1.6%
4.8%
4.7%
0.0%
4.3%
3.3%
2.4%
4.8%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Page 26
Agency
Q8 I am interested in more opportunities to network with other SES

members outside my agency.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

11
238
240
45.5%
33.6%
24.2%
54.5%
37.8%
44.2%
0.0%
22.3%
22.5%
0.0%
5.5%
9.2%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
263
60
31.9%
21.7%
38.8%
50.0%
24.0%
21.7%
4.2%
5.0%
1.1%
1.7%
Development
284
253
334
24.3%
33.2%
39.8%
43.3%
37.9%
37.7%
27.1%
24.1%
17.7%
4.6%
4.0%
4.2%
0.7%
0.8%
0.6%
61
412
47.5%
33.0%
36.1%
35.2%
11.5%
25.0%
4.9%
5.6%
0.0%
1.2%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
113
100
120
149
170
189
334
158
216
187
32.7%
29.0%
42.5%
33.6%
37.6%
28.0%
32.0%
29.7%
25.0%
31.6%
38.9%
35.0%
41.7%
48.3%
39.4%
48.7%
37.7%
40.5%
38.9%
46.5%
17.7%
34.0%
12.5%
14.8%
20.6%
16.9%
23.1%
23.4%
25.0%
18.2%
10.6%
2.0%
3.3%
3.4%
2.4%
5.3%
6.3%
5.1%
9.3%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3%
1.9%
0.0%
21
19
11
31
74
12
47.6%
15.8%
27.3%
19.4%
41.9%
41.7%
23.8%
42.1%
36.4%
35.5%
44.6%
41.7%
23.8%
26.3%
36.4%
25.8%
13.5%
16.7%
4.8%
15.8%
0.0%
19.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
296
27.7%
48.0%
18.9%
5.1%
0.3%
13
46.2%
46.2%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
25.0%
18.4%
31.5%
25.0%
44.7%
38.9%
31.3%
23.7%
25.9%
6.3%
13.2%
3.7%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
12
120
26
47
30
128
21
4945
16.7%
25.8%
23.1%
40.4%
63.3%
38.3%
33.3%
31.9%
50.0%
41.7%
26.9%
34.0%
20.0%
39.1%
47.6%
40.5%
25.0%
27.5%
34.6%
19.1%
13.3%
18.0%
14.3%
21.7%
8.3%
5.0%
15.4%
4.3%
3.3%
4.7%
4.8%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Page 27
Q9 My work gives me a feeling of personal accomplishment.

Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neither Agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
11
45.5%
54.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
239
239
59.4%
52.3%
33.1%
39.3%
4.6%
4.2%
2.5%
3.3%
0.4%
0.8%
264
60
286
54.9%
63.3%
50.3%
36.0%
28.3%
40.6%
3.8%
5.0%
5.6%
4.5%
1.7%
3.1%
0.8%
1.7%
0.3%
251
333
64.5%
64.9%
27.1%
29.4%
6.4%
3.0%
1.6%
1.8%
0.4%
0.9%
61
414
113
100
120
149
170
189
334
50.8%
65.0%
57.5%
62.0%
65.0%
68.5%
69.4%
69.8%
59.9%
36.1%
27.8%
32.7%
31.0%
32.5%
26.8%
23.5%
27.0%
35.9%
4.9%
4.8%
4.4%
4.0%
1.7%
2.7%
5.3%
1.1%
2.1%
6.6%
1.7%
1.8%
1.0%
0.8%
2.0%
1.2%
1.6%
1.8%
1.6%
0.7%
3.5%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
0.3%
Commission
158
216
187
62.7%
65.3%
57.8%
30.4%
28.7%
36.4%
3.2%
3.7%
2.7%
1.9%
1.9%
2.7%
1.9%
0.5%
0.5%
21
19
66.7%
57.9%
23.8%
21.1%
4.8%
10.5%
4.8%
10.5%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
11
31
75
12
54.5%
61.3%
62.7%
75.0%
36.4%
29.0%
34.7%
25.0%
9.1%
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
59.6%
34.3%
3.4%
2.0%
0.7%
13
69.2%
30.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
25
47
30
128
75.0%
60.5%
59.3%
75.0%
66.7%
48.0%
55.3%
60.0%
68.0%
18.8%
39.5%
33.3%
25.0%
31.7%
44.0%
25.5%
33.3%
26.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.4%
0.0%
0.8%
8.0%
10.6%
0.0%
3.1%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
8.5%
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
2.3%
21
4948
42.9%
61.4%
47.6%
32.0%
0.0%
3.7%
4.8%
2.2%
4.8%
0.7%
Agency
Page 28
Q10 My talents are used well in the workplace.

Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neither Agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
11
36.4%
54.5%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
238
240
39.1%
36.7%
45.4%
46.7%
6.3%
7.1%
7.6%
7.5%
1.7%
2.1%
264
60
285
34.8%
45.0%
34.7%
51.1%
38.3%
47.0%
3.8%
1.7%
8.4%
7.2%
13.3%
7.0%
3.0%
1.7%
2.8%
252
334
44.0%
44.9%
39.7%
39.2%
6.0%
5.4%
7.5%
8.1%
2.8%
2.4%
60
413
112
100
120
149
170
189
333
23.3%
49.4%
42.0%
37.0%
50.8%
44.3%
45.9%
54.5%
38.4%
53.3%
39.5%
40.2%
48.0%
42.5%
45.0%
36.5%
38.6%
48.0%
6.7%
4.6%
3.6%
7.0%
3.3%
5.4%
5.3%
3.7%
5.7%
6.7%
5.1%
8.9%
5.0%
3.3%
4.0%
7.6%
2.6%
6.3%
10.0%
1.5%
5.4%
3.0%
0.0%
1.3%
4.7%
0.5%
1.5%
Commission
158
216
187
48.7%
44.9%
32.1%
37.3%
44.9%
50.3%
7.6%
5.6%
8.6%
3.8%
3.7%
7.0%
2.5%
0.9%
2.1%
21
19
47.6%
47.4%
42.9%
36.8%
0.0%
5.3%
4.8%
5.3%
4.8%
5.3%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
11
30
74
12
45.5%
43.3%
45.9%
75.0%
27.3%
43.3%
41.9%
25.0%
9.1%
6.7%
5.4%
0.0%
18.2%
6.7%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
296
44.9%
40.5%
6.4%
6.8%
1.4%
13
53.8%
46.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
43.8%
52.6%
33.3%
50.0%
50.8%
38.5%
44.7%
36.7%
53.9%
43.8%
44.7%
50.0%
50.0%
40.0%
53.8%
27.7%
33.3%
35.2%
6.3%
0.0%
7.4%
0.0%
2.5%
3.8%
6.4%
6.7%
2.3%
0.0%
2.6%
9.3%
0.0%
5.8%
3.8%
17.0%
16.7%
3.9%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
4.3%
6.7%
4.7%
21
4943
38.1%
43.1%
38.1%
42.9%
9.5%
5.4%
9.5%
6.4%
4.8%
2.2%
Agency
Page 29
Agency
Q11 My physical work location is accessible to individuals with physical

disabilities.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

11
239
63.6%
57.3%
36.4%
37.2%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.4%
241
57.3%
38.2%
3.7%
0.8%
0.0%
261
59
286
252
47.1%
67.8%
55.9%
59.5%
45.6%
28.8%
40.2%
36.1%
4.6%
3.4%
1.4%
2.4%
2.3%
0.0%
2.1%
2.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
333
53.2%
39.3%
3.6%
3.6%
0.3%
61
414
113
100
47.5%
55.6%
60.2%
45.0%
45.9%
40.3%
38.1%
50.0%
3.3%
3.4%
0.9%
3.0%
3.3%
0.5%
0.9%
1.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.0%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
120
149
170
189
333
158
216
187
49.2%
57.0%
60.0%
55.6%
57.4%
72.8%
69.9%
60.4%
47.5%
34.2%
35.9%
38.6%
38.4%
25.3%
27.3%
37.4%
0.0%
3.4%
2.9%
2.1%
2.4%
1.3%
0.9%
0.5%
3.3%
4.0%
0.6%
2.6%
1.5%
0.6%
0.5%
1.6%
0.0%
1.3%
0.6%
1.1%
0.3%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
21
19
11
31
75
12
66.7%
52.6%
63.6%
51.6%
60.0%
58.3%
28.6%
36.8%
18.2%
48.4%
36.0%
33.3%
0.0%
10.5%
9.1%
0.0%
2.7%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
65.7%
31.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.3%
13
76.9%
15.4%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
25.0%
73.7%
63.0%
58.3%
70.0%
50.0%
26.3%
37.0%
33.3%
30.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
0.0%
18.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
26
47
30
128
21
4946
30.8%
44.7%
66.7%
71.9%
57.1%
58.3%
42.3%
46.8%
30.0%
25.0%
38.1%
37.1%
26.9%
8.5%
3.3%
1.6%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
4.8%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Page 30
Agency
Q12 My organization has provided workplace accommodations to

employees with disabilities.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
239
241
63.6%
61.1%
56.4%
36.4%
35.1%
38.6%
0.0%
3.3%
4.6%
0.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
262
60
286
251
333
48.9%
61.7%
52.1%
62.5%
54.4%
43.1%
33.3%
42.3%
35.1%
39.3%
6.5%
3.3%
5.6%
2.4%
4.8%
1.1%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
60
413
113
100
120
149
170
188
333
158
51.7%
56.9%
61.1%
45.0%
50.0%
58.4%
49.4%
54.3%
63.4%
70.9%
40.0%
37.0%
34.5%
48.0%
45.8%
35.6%
47.6%
38.8%
33.3%
27.8%
6.7%
5.8%
3.5%
5.0%
3.3%
3.4%
2.4%
5.3%
3.0%
1.3%
1.7%
0.0%
0.9%
2.0%
0.8%
1.3%
0.0%
1.1%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.6%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%

Commission
216
187
71.3%
59.9%
26.4%
36.9%
0.9%
2.7%
0.0%
0.5%
1.4%
0.0%
21
19
11
76.2%
47.4%
45.5%
23.8%
47.4%
36.4%
0.0%
5.3%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
31
75
12
48.4%
65.3%
58.3%
45.2%
28.0%
33.3%
6.5%
5.3%
8.3%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
71.0%
25.6%
2.7%
0.7%
0.0%
13
46.2%
53.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
119
26
47
30
128
21
4944
31.3%
65.8%
66.7%
75.0%
73.1%
34.6%
57.4%
63.3%
75.8%
52.4%
59.2%
56.3%
34.2%
33.3%
25.0%
25.2%
46.2%
42.6%
30.0%
22.7%
33.3%
36.0%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
19.2%
0.0%
6.7%
0.8%
14.3%
3.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Page 31
Agency
Q13 My organization demonstrates support to balance work and other

life issues.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
238
241
27.3%
23.5%
25.7%
63.6%
48.7%
42.3%
9.1%
15.1%
15.4%
0.0%
9.2%
14.1%
0.0%
3.4%
2.5%
264
60
18.2%
30.0%
42.8%
45.0%
15.9%
13.3%
16.7%
8.3%
6.4%
3.3%
Development
286
252
334
23.8%
26.2%
17.4%
56.6%
44.8%
47.0%
11.9%
15.9%
18.0%
6.3%
8.7%
12.6%
1.4%
4.4%
5.1%
61
414
21.3%
23.7%
37.7%
51.2%
26.2%
12.6%
9.8%
11.1%
4.9%
1.4%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
113
100
120
149
170
189
334
158
216
187
25.7%
20.0%
18.3%
20.1%
25.3%
16.4%
27.8%
29.1%
17.6%
29.4%
47.8%
52.0%
47.5%
51.7%
47.1%
51.3%
47.3%
48.1%
36.1%
48.7%
8.0%
13.0%
15.0%
12.1%
14.7%
23.3%
12.9%
10.8%
19.0%
13.4%
14.2%
13.0%
14.2%
13.4%
9.4%
7.4%
9.0%
7.0%
19.0%
5.9%
4.4%
2.0%
5.0%
2.7%
3.5%
1.6%
3.0%
5.1%
8.3%
2.7%
21
19
11
31
74
12
23.8%
47.4%
45.5%
35.5%
48.6%
66.7%
61.9%
42.1%
45.5%
51.6%
39.2%
33.3%
4.8%
5.3%
9.1%
12.9%
9.5%
0.0%
9.5%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
35.4%
45.5%
11.1%
6.7%
1.3%
13
46.2%
53.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
25.0%
42.1%
24.1%
56.3%
47.4%
44.4%
18.8%
7.9%
18.5%
0.0%
2.6%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%

SES wide
12
118
26
47
29
128
21
4948
33.3%
60.2%
3.8%
57.4%
24.1%
23.4%
19.0%
26.1%
41.7%
36.4%
23.1%
34.0%
41.4%
54.7%
19.0%
46.8%
16.7%
3.4%
15.4%
6.4%
6.9%
11.7%
19.0%
13.8%
8.3%
0.0%
38.5%
2.1%
27.6%
7.0%
28.6%
10.1%
0.0%
0.0%
19.2%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
14.3%
3.2%
Page 32
Agency
Q14 My organization values the unique contribution of all employees.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
237
241
9.1%
22.8%
24.5%
63.6%
54.0%
51.0%
18.2%
12.2%
15.8%
9.1%
8.4%
7.5%
0.0%
2.5%
1.2%
264
60
285
253
334
18.9%
21.7%
18.6%
25.7%
20.1%
53.8%
53.3%
57.9%
51.4%
55.7%
13.3%
13.3%
12.6%
12.3%
12.3%
10.6%
10.0%
9.8%
6.7%
10.2%
3.4%
1.7%
1.1%
4.0%
1.8%
61
413
113
99
120
149
169
189
332
11.5%
31.0%
21.2%
23.2%
36.7%
33.6%
30.2%
37.6%
27.1%
41.0%
49.4%
53.1%
50.5%
54.2%
56.4%
40.2%
50.8%
53.9%
29.5%
10.9%
9.7%
12.1%
8.3%
6.7%
12.4%
9.0%
12.0%
13.1%
7.0%
9.7%
9.1%
0.8%
3.4%
14.2%
2.1%
5.4%
4.9%
1.7%
6.2%
5.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.5%
1.5%
Commission
158
216
187
31.0%
30.1%
20.9%
49.4%
44.9%
59.9%
10.8%
14.4%
12.3%
5.1%
6.0%
5.9%
3.8%
4.6%
1.1%
21
19
28.6%
15.8%
47.6%
68.4%
9.5%
10.5%
14.3%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
11
31
75
12
36.4%
32.3%
45.3%
83.3%
45.5%
45.2%
40.0%
16.7%
9.1%
9.7%
9.3%
0.0%
0.0%
12.9%
5.3%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
42.4%
43.8%
7.4%
4.4%
2.0%
13
46.2%
38.5%
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
21
4946
25.0%
21.1%
16.7%
41.7%
53.3%
19.2%
25.5%
30.0%
25.0%
9.5%
28.0%
50.0%
68.4%
46.3%
50.0%
38.3%
53.8%
53.2%
23.3%
57.0%
47.6%
51.0%
12.5%
5.3%
29.6%
8.3%
6.7%
15.4%
14.9%
23.3%
10.9%
19.0%
11.8%
6.3%
5.3%
5.6%
0.0%
0.8%
11.5%
6.4%
20.0%
3.9%
14.3%
7.0%
6.3%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
3.1%
9.5%
2.2%
Page 33
(Note: This question was only seen by those

who answered 3 years or less on question
#3. All others skipped this question.)
Agency
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
Q15 During your first 30 days as a new SES, how satisfied were you with the
training and information you received on key systems and procedures in your
organization?
Neither
Total # of
Very
Satisfied nor
Very
Respondents Satisfied Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
5
81
83
20.0%
6.2%
6.0%
0.0%
38.3%
39.8%
0.0%
30.9%
26.5%
80.0%
18.5%
16.9%
0.0%
6.2%
10.8%
102
20
92
9.8%
0.0%
5.4%
40.2%
15.0%
33.7%
20.6%
45.0%
33.7%
22.5%
40.0%
18.5%
6.9%
0.0%
8.7%
90
152
8.9%
11.2%
37.8%
28.3%
33.3%
28.9%
17.8%
21.1%
2.2%
10.5%
20
171
41
38
51
60
63
50
111
69
82
48
0.0%
16.4%
12.2%
18.4%
25.5%
16.7%
7.9%
20.0%
23.4%
8.7%
22.0%
14.6%
40.0%
33.9%
31.7%
36.8%
45.1%
31.7%
34.9%
50.0%
31.5%
43.5%
31.7%
27.1%
15.0%
22.2%
26.8%
34.2%
17.6%
23.3%
27.0%
6.0%
26.1%
21.7%
18.3%
35.4%
40.0%
23.4%
26.8%
10.5%
9.8%
23.3%
20.6%
22.0%
17.1%
20.3%
20.7%
18.8%
5.0%
4.1%
2.4%
0.0%
2.0%
5.0%
9.5%
2.0%
1.8%
5.8%
7.3%
4.2%
7
8
7
9
34
3
14.3%
25.0%
0.0%
11.1%
17.6%
33.3%
14.3%
50.0%
14.3%
66.7%
23.5%
0.0%
57.1%
12.5%
42.9%
0.0%
38.2%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
42.9%
11.1%
17.6%
66.7%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
2.9%
0.0%
80
26.3%
36.3%
23.8%
12.5%
1.3%
0.0%
40.0%
0.0%
60.0%
0.0%
6
9
16
5
35
9
17
12
56
16.7%
33.3%
6.3%
20.0%
37.1%
0.0%
17.6%
8.3%
32.1%
50.0%
55.6%
50.0%
20.0%
40.0%
55.6%
35.3%
33.3%
42.9%
33.3%
11.1%
25.0%
20.0%
11.4%
22.2%
23.5%
25.0%
19.6%
0.0%
0.0%
18.8%
40.0%
8.6%
11.1%
11.8%
16.7%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
11.1%
11.8%
16.7%
0.0%
11
1787
18.2%
14.9%
18.2%
35.5%
27.3%
25.1%
18.2%
19.0%
18.2%
5.4%
Page 34
(Note: This question was only seen by

those who answered 3 years or less on
question #3. All others skipped this
question.)
Agency
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
Q16 During your first 30 days as a new SES, how satisfied were you with the
support you received from your agency?
Neither
Total # of
Very
Satisfied nor
Very
Dissatisfied
5
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
81
14.8%
48.1%
16.0%
18.5%
2.5%
83
16.9%
49.4%
19.3%
8.4%
6.0%
102
20
92
21.6%
10.0%
13.0%
47.1%
30.0%
39.1%
14.7%
30.0%
33.7%
12.7%
30.0%
7.6%
3.9%
0.0%
6.5%
89
152
20.2%
17.8%
40.4%
36.8%
27.0%
25.7%
11.2%
12.5%
1.1%
7.2%
20
169
40
38
52
60
63
50
111
69
82
48
0.0%
25.4%
25.0%
21.1%
32.7%
20.0%
17.5%
34.0%
25.2%
30.4%
22.0%
25.0%
50.0%
37.3%
37.5%
36.8%
48.1%
43.3%
39.7%
42.0%
40.5%
47.8%
32.9%
31.3%
25.0%
22.5%
22.5%
28.9%
13.5%
21.7%
19.0%
6.0%
18.0%
14.5%
23.2%
31.3%
20.0%
11.2%
12.5%
7.9%
5.8%
15.0%
19.0%
16.0%
12.6%
4.3%
14.6%
8.3%
5.0%
3.6%
2.5%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
2.0%
3.6%
2.9%
7.3%
4.2%
7
8
7
9
34
3
14.3%
37.5%
14.3%
44.4%
32.4%
33.3%
42.9%
62.5%
28.6%
33.3%
32.4%
66.7%
28.6%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
26.5%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
42.9%
11.1%
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
2.9%
0.0%
81
27.2%
35.8%
27.2%
8.6%
1.2%
20.0%
20.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
6
9
16
5
35
9
17
12
56
0.0%
44.4%
12.5%
40.0%
42.9%
0.0%
17.6%
16.7%
37.5%
66.7%
55.6%
43.8%
20.0%
40.0%
55.6%
41.2%
41.7%
41.1%
16.7%
0.0%
37.5%
0.0%
8.6%
22.2%
23.5%
16.7%
17.9%
16.7%
0.0%
6.3%
40.0%
5.7%
11.1%
11.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
11.1%
5.9%
8.3%
0.0%
11
1785
18.2%
22.9%
36.4%
40.6%
18.2%
21.2%
18.2%
11.5%
9.1%
3.7%
Page 35
(Note: This question was only seen by

those who answered 3 years or less on
question.)
Agency
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
Q17 Overall, how satisfied were you with your onboarding

experience as a new SES?
Satisfied
20.0%
42.0%
43.4%
Neither
Satisfied nor
Dissatisfied
0.0%
24.7%
26.5%
Dissatisfied
60.0%
17.3%
9.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
0.0%
4.9%
7.2%
16.7%
0.0%
8.7%
41.2%
15.0%
34.8%
19.6%
45.0%
34.8%
17.6%
40.0%
12.0%
4.9%
0.0%
9.8%
90
152
15.6%
12.5%
37.8%
38.8%
28.9%
25.0%
16.7%
15.1%
1.1%
8.6%
20
171
41
38
51
60
63
50
111
69
82
48
0.0%
19.3%
14.6%
21.1%
25.5%
8.3%
15.9%
28.0%
17.1%
18.8%
19.5%
20.8%
45.0%
36.8%
48.8%
42.1%
49.0%
33.3%
38.1%
44.0%
37.8%
52.2%
29.3%
33.3%
25.0%
22.2%
22.0%
21.1%
11.8%
20.0%
12.7%
8.0%
24.3%
18.8%
19.5%
29.2%
30.0%
17.0%
12.2%
10.5%
13.7%
31.7%
22.2%
16.0%
15.3%
7.2%
22.0%
12.5%
0.0%
4.7%
2.4%
5.3%
0.0%
6.7%
11.1%
4.0%
5.4%
2.9%
9.8%
4.2%
7
8
7
9
34
3
14.3%
37.5%
0.0%
33.3%
17.6%
33.3%
42.9%
62.5%
28.6%
44.4%
29.4%
0.0%
28.6%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
38.2%
33.3%
14.3%
0.0%
57.1%
22.2%
8.8%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
0.0%
81
32.1%
30.9%
25.9%
9.9%
1.2%
0.0%
40.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
6
9
16
5
35
9
17
12
56
16.7%
44.4%
12.5%
20.0%
42.9%
0.0%
17.6%
8.3%
23.2%
50.0%
55.6%
43.8%
40.0%
37.1%
55.6%
29.4%
41.7%
57.1%
33.3%
0.0%
31.3%
0.0%
8.6%
22.2%
35.3%
25.0%
16.1%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
40.0%
8.6%
11.1%
11.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
11.1%
5.9%
8.3%
0.0%
11
1788
27.3%
17.6%
18.2%
39.0%
27.3%
22.8%
9.1%
15.3%
18.2%
5.2%
Total # of
Respondents
5
81
83
Very
Satisfied
20.0%
11.1%
13.3%
102
20
92
Page 36
Agency
Q18 In my organization, there are sufficient funds available for my jobrelated development to maintain up-to-date skills.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

11
238
241
9.1%
12.6%
10.8%
36.4%
37.8%
34.4%
27.3%
18.1%
23.2%
27.3%
19.7%
22.4%
0.0%
11.8%
9.1%
264
60
18.6%
5.0%
41.7%
43.3%
20.1%
28.3%
16.7%
18.3%
3.0%
5.0%
Development
286
253
334
11.2%
13.0%
15.0%
43.4%
43.5%
49.1%
21.3%
21.3%
15.0%
20.6%
18.6%
17.4%
3.5%
3.6%
3.6%
61
413
11.5%
8.0%
36.1%
39.0%
16.4%
18.9%
26.2%
26.2%
9.8%
8.0%
Department of Labor
Department of State
113
99
120
149
170
189
334
158
216
187
21
19
4.4%
13.1%
20.8%
22.8%
12.9%
20.6%
12.6%
14.6%
27.8%
12.3%
4.8%
5.3%
23.0%
44.4%
49.2%
55.0%
43.5%
51.3%
36.8%
43.0%
52.8%
43.9%
28.6%
47.4%
20.4%
17.2%
13.3%
14.1%
14.1%
16.4%
13.5%
17.7%
12.0%
13.9%
4.8%
26.3%
35.4%
18.2%
10.8%
7.4%
24.7%
9.5%
27.2%
20.3%
5.6%
26.2%
42.9%
10.5%
16.8%
7.1%
5.8%
0.7%
4.7%
2.1%
9.9%
4.4%
1.9%
3.7%
19.0%
10.5%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
11
31
74
12
0.0%
12.9%
20.3%
16.7%
9.1%
41.9%
44.6%
25.0%
0.0%
22.6%
21.6%
25.0%
27.3%
16.1%
13.5%
25.0%
63.6%
6.5%
0.0%
8.3%
297
11.4%
41.8%
19.5%
21.2%
6.1%
13
23.1%
46.2%
15.4%
15.4%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
30
128
21
4950
12.5%
2.6%
13.0%
25.0%
30.0%
3.8%
4.3%
16.7%
8.6%
23.8%
14.2%
37.5%
47.4%
53.7%
41.7%
47.5%
38.5%
46.8%
26.7%
39.8%
42.9%
42.5%
18.8%
18.4%
7.4%
16.7%
15.8%
19.2%
6.4%
26.7%
17.2%
9.5%
17.3%
25.0%
28.9%
24.1%
8.3%
6.7%
34.6%
27.7%
20.0%
27.3%
23.8%
20.1%
6.3%
2.6%
1.9%
8.3%
0.0%
3.8%
14.9%
10.0%
7.0%
0.0%
5.9%
Page 37
Agency
Q19 My developmental needs are assessed.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
237
239
0.0%
7.6%
6.7%
18.2%
44.3%
36.0%
54.5%
20.3%
31.0%
18.2%
20.7%
22.2%
9.1%
7.2%
4.2%
263
60
285
252
329
8.4%
5.0%
4.9%
6.7%
6.7%
38.0%
43.3%
35.4%
36.9%
31.6%
22.8%
30.0%
30.9%
27.8%
27.7%
24.3%
13.3%
20.7%
23.8%
27.1%
6.5%
8.3%
8.1%
4.8%
7.0%
60
403
112
100
119
149
170
189
332
6.7%
8.7%
3.6%
5.0%
21.0%
13.4%
11.8%
13.8%
12.0%
25.0%
32.3%
33.9%
24.0%
47.1%
44.3%
31.2%
50.3%
40.4%
23.3%
25.8%
26.8%
33.0%
15.1%
26.2%
24.7%
20.6%
21.7%
23.3%
25.8%
25.9%
27.0%
11.8%
12.1%
25.9%
12.7%
19.0%
21.7%
7.4%
9.8%
11.0%
5.0%
4.0%
6.5%
2.6%
6.9%
Commission
154
214
185
9.7%
20.6%
3.2%
35.1%
49.5%
29.7%
24.0%
12.1%
31.9%
24.7%
14.5%
26.5%
6.5%
3.3%
8.6%
20
18
10.0%
0.0%
35.0%
27.8%
20.0%
50.0%
20.0%
16.7%
15.0%
5.6%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
11
31
75
12
9.1%
9.7%
13.3%
25.0%
9.1%
25.8%
41.3%
25.0%
27.3%
29.0%
24.0%
25.0%
27.3%
29.0%
16.0%
16.7%
27.3%
6.5%
5.3%
8.3%
295
12.9%
40.7%
25.1%
18.3%
3.1%
13
30.8%
46.2%
23.1%
0.0%
0.0%
16
36
54
12
120
25
47
30
124
21
4905
6.3%
2.8%
5.6%
33.3%
22.5%
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
8.9%
4.8%
9.7%
18.8%
61.1%
37.0%
8.3%
55.8%
24.0%
25.5%
26.7%
45.2%
19.0%
37.8%
25.0%
22.2%
27.8%
16.7%
11.7%
32.0%
34.0%
16.7%
29.0%
28.6%
24.9%
31.3%
11.1%
22.2%
33.3%
7.5%
40.0%
23.4%
30.0%
14.5%
28.6%
21.2%
18.8%
2.8%
7.4%
8.3%
2.5%
4.0%
17.0%
10.0%
2.4%
19.0%
6.4%
Page 38
Q20 My developmental needs are met.

Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

11
236
238
45.5%
71.6%
69.3%
54.5%
28.4%
30.7%
262
68.3%
31.7%
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
58
282
251
330
70.7%
69.5%
68.1%
65.8%
29.3%
30.5%
31.9%
34.2%
58
405
109
100
119
148
169
51.7%
62.5%
52.3%
65.0%
73.9%
82.4%
69.8%
48.3%
37.5%
47.7%
35.0%
26.1%
17.6%
30.2%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
188
328
152
216
186
21
19
11
29
74
12
81.4%
66.5%
70.4%
81.5%
65.1%
52.4%
63.2%
27.3%
62.1%
79.7%
58.3%
18.6%
33.5%
29.6%
18.5%
34.9%
47.6%
36.8%
72.7%
37.9%
20.3%
41.7%
296
76.0%
24.0%
13
92.3%
7.7%
16
38
53
12
119
26
47
30
127
68.8%
84.2%
69.8%
66.7%
90.8%
57.7%
53.2%
60.0%
78.0%
31.3%
15.8%
30.2%
33.3%
9.2%
42.3%
46.8%
40.0%
22.0%

SES wide
21
4893
57.1%
69.9%
42.9%
30.1%
Agency
Page 39

who answered no on question #20. All
others skipped this question.)
Agency
Development
Q21a My developmental needs are not being met because of...lack of funding
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
16.7%
47.0%
41.1%
50.0%
40.9%
31.5%
0.0%
7.6%
12.3%
33.3%
3.0%
12.3%
0.0%
1.5%
2.7%
79
17
83
78
112
16.5%
29.4%
32.5%
23.1%
20.5%
31.6%
29.4%
26.5%
34.6%
32.1%
12.7%
29.4%
25.3%
17.9%
18.8%
34.2%
5.9%
13.3%
21.8%
24.1%
5.1%
5.9%
2.4%
2.6%
4.5%
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree
6
66
73
27
37.0%
44.4%
3.7%
14.8%
0.0%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
150
52
34
30
24
49
34
109
44
40
64
38.7%
51.9%
20.6%
16.7%
8.3%
36.7%
23.5%
44.0%
18.2%
10.0%
34.4%
34.0%
28.8%
23.5%
40.0%
25.0%
32.7%
17.6%
37.6%
22.7%
32.5%
34.4%
16.7%
9.6%
32.4%
13.3%
33.3%
20.4%
35.3%
8.3%
25.0%
15.0%
15.6%
9.3%
7.7%
14.7%
26.7%
25.0%
6.1%
20.6%
9.2%
31.8%
32.5%
10.9%
1.3%
1.9%
8.8%
3.3%
8.3%
4.1%
2.9%
0.9%
2.3%
10.0%
4.7%
10
7
8
11
15
5
50.0%
71.4%
75.0%
45.5%
13.3%
20.0%
20.0%
14.3%
25.0%
18.2%
40.0%
80.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
36.4%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
26.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
71
49.3%
35.2%
5.6%
8.5%
1.4%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
80.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
6
16
4
10
11
22
12
28
9
1446
33.3%
31.3%
25.0%
50.0%
45.5%
27.3%
33.3%
57.1%
11.1%
33.1%
50.0%
37.5%
25.0%
0.0%
36.4%
40.9%
8.3%
35.7%
22.2%
32.8%
16.7%
12.5%
0.0%
20.0%
18.2%
18.2%
33.3%
3.6%
33.3%
15.7%
0.0%
18.8%
50.0%
30.0%
0.0%
13.6%
16.7%
3.6%
33.3%
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Page 40

Q21b My developmental needs are not being met because of...inability to

take time away from the job
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
33.3%
36.4%
33.3%
34.8%
16.7%
7.6%
16.7%
16.7%
0.0%
4.5%
70
31.4%
42.9%
11.4%
11.4%
2.9%
81
17
83
77
111
24.7%
11.8%
27.7%
32.5%
35.1%
61.7%
47.1%
43.4%
39.0%
42.3%
9.9%
29.4%
15.7%
9.1%
7.2%
2.5%
11.8%
10.8%
16.9%
11.7%
1.2%
0.0%
2.4%
2.6%
3.6%
26
146
50
32
30.8%
22.6%
34.0%
28.1%
34.6%
32.2%
32.0%
46.9%
11.5%
21.9%
18.0%
9.4%
19.2%
19.2%
16.0%
12.5%
3.8%
4.1%
0.0%
3.1%

Commission
30
26
49
35
107
40
37
64
16.7%
34.6%
38.8%
22.9%
27.1%
35.0%
27.0%
28.1%
60.0%
50.0%
36.7%
57.1%
38.3%
42.5%
59.5%
50.0%
6.7%
11.5%
10.2%
5.7%
12.1%
10.0%
8.1%
9.4%
13.3%
3.8%
14.3%
11.4%
21.5%
12.5%
2.7%
12.5%
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.9%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
10
7
7
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
20.0%
14.3%
71.4%
30.0%
71.4%
0.0%
50.0%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
15
5
18.2%
33.3%
0.0%
45.5%
33.3%
20.0%
36.4%
13.3%
80.0%
0.0%
13.3%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
69
17.4%
39.1%
14.5%
24.6%
4.3%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5
6
16
4
40.0%
16.7%
56.3%
0.0%
60.0%
50.0%
43.8%
75.0%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11
11
20
12
27
9
1422
9.1%
63.6%
5.0%
16.7%
14.8%
22.2%
27.8%
54.5%
36.4%
50.0%
50.0%
33.3%
33.3%
42.5%
18.2%
0.0%
10.0%
8.3%
14.8%
22.2%
12.8%
18.2%
0.0%
30.0%
16.7%
29.6%
22.2%
14.5%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
8.3%
7.4%
0.0%
2.4%
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree

6
66
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Agency

SES wide
Page 41

Agency
Q21c My developmental needs are not being met because of...lack of

support from superiors
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree

6
65
73
0.0%
23.1%
11.0%
16.7%
21.5%
28.8%
33.3%
30.8%
32.9%
50.0%
15.4%
21.9%
0.0%
9.2%
5.5%
82
14
86
76
17.1%
21.4%
17.4%
14.5%
43.9%
7.1%
32.6%
30.3%
14.6%
28.6%
34.9%
25.0%
19.5%
28.6%
11.6%
25.0%
4.9%
14.3%
3.5%
5.3%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
113
16.8%
33.6%
20.4%
24.8%
4.4%
28
150
51
33
31
25
50
35
109
45
25.0%
15.3%
35.3%
21.2%
9.7%
16.0%
20.0%
17.1%
18.3%
20.0%
21.4%
30.0%
7.8%
33.3%
22.6%
28.0%
26.0%
25.7%
22.9%
33.3%
28.6%
29.3%
33.3%
33.3%
38.7%
36.0%
36.0%
34.3%
34.9%
31.1%
17.9%
20.7%
15.7%
12.1%
25.8%
16.0%
16.0%
22.9%
17.4%
6.7%
7.1%
4.7%
7.8%
0.0%
3.2%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
6.4%
8.9%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
37
63
13.5%
14.3%
45.9%
34.9%
21.6%
28.6%
16.2%
15.9%
2.7%
6.3%
10
7
7
10
15
5
30.0%
14.3%
14.3%
30.0%
13.3%
0.0%
30.0%
0.0%
14.3%
40.0%
33.3%
20.0%
20.0%
71.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
40.0%
20.0%
14.3%
28.6%
10.0%
13.3%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
42.9%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
70
12.9%
24.3%
22.9%
34.3%
5.7%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5
6
16
4
11
11
22
12
28
9
1444
20.0%
16.7%
25.0%
0.0%
18.2%
18.2%
13.6%
25.0%
3.6%
33.3%
17.1%
0.0%
50.0%
37.5%
75.0%
27.3%
27.3%
31.8%
25.0%
17.9%
44.4%
29.3%
20.0%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
36.4%
45.5%
22.7%
41.7%
25.0%
22.2%
28.6%
60.0%
33.3%
12.5%
25.0%
9.1%
9.1%
27.3%
8.3%
46.4%
0.0%
19.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
4.5%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
5.1%
Page 42

Q21d My developmental needs are not being met because of...appropriate

training not offered
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
16.7%
12.1%
11.1%
16.7%
24.2%
29.2%
50.0%
36.4%
29.2%
16.7%
18.2%
26.4%
0.0%
9.1%
4.2%
80
17
83
76
111
6.3%
5.9%
6.0%
7.9%
12.6%
31.3%
47.1%
33.7%
46.1%
25.2%
30.0%
29.4%
27.7%
26.3%
28.8%
30.0%
17.6%
26.5%
17.1%
28.8%
2.5%
0.0%
6.0%
2.6%
4.5%
25
147
52
32
31
25
47
34
20.0%
17.0%
23.1%
9.4%
22.6%
8.0%
8.5%
5.9%
40.0%
35.4%
26.9%
34.4%
41.9%
36.0%
17.0%
17.6%
24.0%
26.5%
26.9%
37.5%
9.7%
20.0%
29.8%
50.0%
16.0%
18.4%
17.3%
15.6%
25.8%
36.0%
40.4%
26.5%
0.0%
2.7%
5.8%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%

Commission
109
42
38
64
11.9%
14.3%
10.5%
12.5%
27.5%
38.1%
39.5%
17.2%
36.7%
11.9%
21.1%
26.6%
18.3%
26.2%
26.3%
31.3%
5.5%
9.5%
2.6%
12.5%
10
20.0%
30.0%
30.0%
20.0%
0.0%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
7
7
11
15
5
28.6%
28.6%
9.1%
6.7%
0.0%
42.9%
14.3%
54.5%
46.7%
60.0%
28.6%
42.9%
9.1%
13.3%
40.0%
0.0%
14.3%
27.3%
26.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
66
4.5%
22.7%
24.2%
42.4%
6.1%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5
6
16
4
11
11
22
11
28
0.0%
16.7%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.6%
18.2%
3.6%
20.0%
16.7%
25.0%
50.0%
18.2%
45.5%
36.4%
45.5%
21.4%
60.0%
16.7%
31.3%
25.0%
45.5%
27.3%
9.1%
18.2%
25.0%
20.0%
33.3%
31.3%
25.0%
36.4%
27.3%
22.7%
18.2%
46.4%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
18.2%
0.0%
3.6%
9
1424
11.1%
11.4%
33.3%
31.0%
22.2%
27.9%
22.2%
25.0%
11.1%
4.7%
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State

SES wide
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree
6
66
72
Page 43

Q21e My developmental needs are not being met because of...other
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.1%
50.0%
82.1%
50.0%
5.1%
0.0%
7.7%
36
2.8%
8.3%
77.8%
8.3%
2.8%
42
9
56
40
58
9.5%
33.3%
5.4%
12.5%
6.9%
16.7%
0.0%
1.8%
12.5%
5.2%
66.7%
66.7%
82.1%
62.5%
72.4%
4.8%
0.0%
3.6%
5.0%
12.1%
2.4%
0.0%
7.1%
7.5%
3.4%
13
78
25
15
0.0%
9.0%
16.0%
6.7%
7.7%
9.0%
8.0%
6.7%
61.5%
75.6%
68.0%
73.3%
15.4%
3.8%
0.0%
6.7%
15.4%
2.6%
8.0%
6.7%

Commission
13
16
20
20
68
25
19
29
7.7%
12.5%
0.0%
20.0%
2.9%
12.0%
21.1%
10.3%
23.1%
18.8%
10.0%
15.0%
11.8%
4.0%
5.3%
10.3%
69.2%
68.8%
90.0%
65.0%
82.4%
64.0%
68.4%
69.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
16.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
5.3%
10.3%
8
4
4
12.5%
25.0%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
62.5%
75.0%
75.0%
12.5%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
Humanities
9
10
2
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
22.2%
20.0%
0.0%
66.7%
60.0%
100.0%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30
3.3%
10.0%
70.0%
13.3%
3.3%
2
2
7
1
5
5
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
71.4%
100.0%
80.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
9
4
15
6
756
11.1%
0.0%
13.3%
33.3%
8.2%
22.2%
25.0%
0.0%
16.7%
9.3%
44.4%
50.0%
66.7%
50.0%
73.1%
11.1%
25.0%
13.3%
0.0%
5.6%
11.1%
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
3.8%
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree

2
39
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Agency
Page 44
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q22 I take advantage of the developmental opportunities that are

available to me.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree Disagree
11
9.1%
63.6%
18.2%
9.1%
0.0%
238
19.7%
61.8%
14.3%
3.4%
0.8%
237
17.3%
54.9%
18.6%
7.6%
1.7%
260
59
280
248
328
11.9%
10.2%
11.4%
15.7%
19.5%
57.3%
67.8%
55.4%
60.1%
49.7%
17.3%
18.6%
24.3%
16.9%
20.1%
13.5%
3.4%
8.2%
6.9%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.4%
1.5%
60
409
111
98
120
146
169
189
332
154
215
185
23.3%
22.0%
14.4%
14.3%
41.7%
19.9%
18.9%
20.1%
20.2%
24.0%
35.8%
14.1%
53.3%
58.9%
50.5%
51.0%
50.0%
63.0%
59.8%
59.8%
59.3%
53.2%
53.0%
58.4%
20.0%
13.2%
25.2%
22.4%
5.8%
12.3%
13.0%
16.4%
13.3%
14.9%
6.5%
21.1%
3.3%
5.9%
9.0%
12.2%
2.5%
4.1%
7.7%
3.2%
6.9%
6.5%
4.2%
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
0.5%
0.3%
1.3%
0.5%
0.5%
21
17
10
30
73
12
42.9%
11.8%
30.0%
13.3%
21.9%
41.7%
28.6%
52.9%
30.0%
43.3%
57.5%
50.0%
23.8%
23.5%
30.0%
33.3%
13.7%
8.3%
4.8%
11.8%
10.0%
10.0%
6.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
21.2%
57.2%
16.8%
4.7%
0.0%
13
30.8%
53.8%
7.7%
7.7%
0.0%
15
38
54
12
119
26
46
29
128
21
4893
20.0%
21.1%
25.9%
16.7%
18.5%
3.8%
8.7%
27.6%
37.5%
38.1%
20.2%
40.0%
65.8%
57.4%
66.7%
63.9%
53.8%
58.7%
58.6%
53.1%
33.3%
56.5%
26.7%
5.3%
13.0%
8.3%
13.4%
30.8%
28.3%
13.8%
7.8%
19.0%
16.3%
13.3%
7.9%
3.7%
8.3%
4.2%
3.8%
4.3%
0.0%
1.6%
9.5%
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Page 45
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q23 How satisfied are you with the developmental opportunities you receive?
Neither
Total # of
Very
Very
Satisfied nor
Dissatisfied
11
9.1%
18.2%
36.4%
36.4%
0.0%
237
17.7%
44.3%
24.9%
11.0%
2.1%
240
14.6%
40.0%
30.0%
14.2%
1.3%
263
60
285
251
334
15.2%
10.0%
13.0%
12.4%
13.8%
46.4%
50.0%
41.8%
49.0%
40.7%
23.2%
21.7%
35.4%
26.7%
30.5%
14.4%
13.3%
8.8%
10.8%
13.5%
0.8%
5.0%
1.1%
1.2%
1.5%
61
411
112
100
120
149
170
188
332
157
216
186
9.8%
14.6%
7.1%
16.0%
26.7%
20.1%
17.6%
28.2%
13.3%
15.3%
31.5%
16.1%
34.4%
44.0%
33.9%
31.0%
48.3%
54.4%
44.1%
47.9%
49.1%
52.2%
48.1%
45.2%
34.4%
26.0%
35.7%
33.0%
11.7%
18.8%
26.5%
20.7%
24.4%
19.7%
13.4%
30.1%
18.0%
13.9%
16.1%
15.0%
12.5%
6.7%
10.6%
2.7%
11.1%
10.8%
6.0%
7.5%
3.3%
1.5%
7.1%
5.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.2%
0.5%
2.1%
1.9%
0.9%
1.1%
21
19
11
31
73
12
9.5%
15.8%
9.1%
16.1%
26.0%
16.7%
33.3%
42.1%
9.1%
35.5%
41.1%
50.0%
33.3%
31.6%
36.4%
22.6%
24.7%
25.0%
14.3%
10.5%
36.4%
25.8%
8.2%
8.3%
9.5%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
297
25.9%
47.5%
18.2%
8.4%
0.0%
13
38.5%
23.1%
30.8%
7.7%
0.0%
16
38
54
12
120
26
47
29
128
21
4935
12.5%
15.8%
22.2%
16.7%
31.7%
0.0%
8.5%
17.2%
21.9%
23.8%
17.6%
25.0%
57.9%
46.3%
41.7%
50.8%
42.3%
44.7%
20.7%
55.5%
28.6%
44.8%
43.8%
15.8%
24.1%
25.0%
14.2%
42.3%
25.5%
41.4%
14.8%
28.6%
25.1%
12.5%
10.5%
7.4%
16.7%
2.5%
15.4%
12.8%
13.8%
7.8%
14.3%
10.9%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
8.5%
6.9%
0.0%
4.8%
1.6%
Page 46
Q24a Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...received a 360-type assessment
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
238
45.5%
45.3%
47.9%
54.5%
54.7%
52.1%
262
60
282
250
333
50.8%
51.7%
51.4%
43.6%
35.1%
49.2%
48.3%
48.6%
56.4%
64.9%
58
410
113
100
120
148
169
189
332
158
216
187
21
18
11
31
73
12
296
13
79.3%
38.5%
82.3%
52.0%
55.0%
53.4%
51.5%
70.9%
93.7%
53.8%
93.1%
56.1%
95.2%
27.8%
9.1%
51.6%
32.9%
41.7%
67.9%
92.3%
20.7%
61.5%
17.7%
48.0%
45.0%
46.6%
48.5%
29.1%
6.3%
46.2%
6.9%
43.9%
4.8%
72.2%
90.9%
48.4%
67.1%
58.3%
32.1%
7.7%
16
37
52
12
120
25
47
30
128
21
0.0%
54.1%
61.5%
16.7%
80.0%
56.0%
27.7%
56.7%
58.6%
66.7%
100.0%
45.9%
38.5%
83.3%
20.0%
44.0%
72.3%
43.3%
41.4%
33.3%
SES wide
4919
56.2%
43.8%
Agency
Page 47
Q24b Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...been on a developmental assignment lasting
more than 30 days
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
239
0.0%
21.2%
13.4%
100.0%
78.8%
86.6%
261
60
284
249
332
9.2%
13.3%
17.3%
14.1%
18.1%
90.8%
86.7%
82.7%
85.9%
81.9%
61
412
113
100
118
148
169
189
331
158
213
186
21
18
11
31
73
12
296
13
11.5%
10.4%
10.6%
8.0%
8.5%
18.2%
17.8%
12.2%
28.7%
16.5%
24.9%
25.8%
4.8%
5.6%
0.0%
3.2%
23.3%
8.3%
22.3%
15.4%
88.5%
89.6%
89.4%
92.0%
91.5%
81.8%
82.2%
87.8%
71.3%
83.5%
75.1%
74.2%
95.2%
94.4%
100.0%
96.8%
76.7%
91.7%
77.7%
84.6%
16
37
52
12
120
25
47
30
127
21
0.0%
16.2%
21.2%
8.3%
47.5%
12.0%
12.8%
23.3%
26.0%
9.5%
100.0%
83.8%
78.8%
91.7%
52.5%
88.0%
87.2%
76.7%
74.0%
90.5%
SES wide
4915
17.5%
82.5%
Agency
Page 48
Q24c Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...had a mentor advising you for developmental
purposes
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
238
9.1%
28.8%
21.8%
90.9%
71.2%
78.2%
262
60
282
251
330
24.8%
15.0%
23.4%
28.3%
21.8%
75.2%
85.0%
76.6%
71.7%
78.2%
60
410
113
100
120
147
168
188
331
157
216
187
21
18
11
31
72
12
294
13
20.0%
22.0%
13.3%
19.0%
43.3%
34.7%
21.4%
38.3%
36.3%
22.9%
55.1%
32.6%
19.0%
11.1%
36.4%
9.7%
37.5%
33.3%
35.7%
15.4%
80.0%
78.0%
86.7%
81.0%
56.7%
65.3%
78.6%
61.7%
63.7%
77.1%
44.9%
67.4%
81.0%
88.9%
63.6%
90.3%
62.5%
66.7%
64.3%
84.6%
16
38
53
12
119
25
47
30
128
21
25.0%
42.1%
28.3%
8.3%
66.4%
16.0%
14.9%
30.0%
39.8%
9.5%
75.0%
57.9%
71.7%
91.7%
33.6%
84.0%
85.1%
70.0%
60.2%
90.5%
SES wide
4912
29.3%
70.7%
Agency
Page 49
Q24d Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...received formal executive coaching?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
238
0.0%
33.1%
35.3%
100.0%
66.9%
64.7%
261
60
281
249
332
35.2%
26.7%
31.0%
34.5%
19.0%
64.8%
73.3%
69.0%
65.5%
81.0%
60
410
113
100
120
148
167
187
331
157
214
187
21
18
11
31
74
12
295
13
20.0%
21.0%
15.0%
19.0%
40.8%
51.4%
25.7%
47.1%
46.5%
36.9%
56.5%
49.2%
9.5%
16.7%
36.4%
29.0%
51.4%
25.0%
55.9%
23.1%
80.0%
79.0%
85.0%
81.0%
59.2%
48.6%
74.3%
52.9%
53.5%
63.1%
43.5%
50.8%
90.5%
83.3%
63.6%
71.0%
48.6%
75.0%
44.1%
76.9%
16
37
52
12
119
25
47
30
126
21
18.8%
24.3%
36.5%
8.3%
72.3%
36.0%
14.9%
46.7%
42.9%
28.6%
81.3%
75.7%
63.5%
91.7%
27.7%
64.0%
85.1%
53.3%
57.1%
71.4%
SES wide
4906
36.2%
63.8%
Agency
Page 50
Q24e Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...attended a residential executive development
program?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
239
9.1%
29.7%
32.2%
90.9%
70.3%
67.8%
260
60
284
251
332
36.5%
28.3%
14.8%
28.3%
24.7%
63.5%
71.7%
85.2%
71.7%
75.3%
60
411
113
100
120
148
168
188
331
157
216
187
21
18
11
31
72
12
295
13
21.7%
26.5%
14.2%
40.0%
63.3%
58.1%
23.8%
52.7%
37.8%
28.0%
34.7%
26.2%
61.9%
16.7%
18.2%
19.4%
12.5%
75.0%
37.6%
15.4%
78.3%
73.5%
85.8%
60.0%
36.7%
41.9%
76.2%
47.3%
62.2%
72.0%
65.3%
73.8%
38.1%
83.3%
81.8%
80.6%
87.5%
25.0%
62.4%
84.6%
16
38
52
12
119
25
47
30
128
21
6.3%
52.6%
40.4%
33.3%
39.5%
20.0%
29.8%
50.0%
44.5%
42.9%
93.8%
47.4%
59.6%
66.7%
60.5%
80.0%
70.2%
50.0%
55.5%
57.1%
SES wide
4917
32.4%
67.6%
Agency
Page 51
Q24f Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...taken a sabbatical?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
239
0.0%
1.7%
1.7%
100.0%
98.3%
98.3%
261
60
285
251
330
2.3%
0.0%
1.4%
1.6%
1.2%
97.7%
100.0%
98.6%
98.4%
98.8%
59
412
113
100
120
148
168
188
331
158
214
187
21
18
11
31
72
12
296
13
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
1.1%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
9.7%
2.8%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
100.0%
97.6%
100.0%
98.0%
100.0%
100.0%
99.4%
100.0%
99.4%
99.4%
99.5%
98.9%
95.2%
100.0%
100.0%
90.3%
97.2%
100.0%
98.6%
100.0%
16
38
53
12
120
25
47
30
128
21
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.8%
4.8%
100.0%
100.0%
92.5%
100.0%
99.2%
100.0%
100.0%
96.7%
99.2%
95.2%
SES wide
4919
1.3%
98.7%
Agency
Page 52
Q24g Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...served as a mentor?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
236
239
72.7%
70.8%
62.8%
27.3%
29.2%
37.2%
262
60
285
250
332
60.3%
75.0%
63.5%
68.8%
66.9%
39.7%
25.0%
36.5%
31.2%
33.1%
60
413
113
100
120
148
169
188
331
157
215
187
21
18
11
31
71
12
295
13
65.0%
47.5%
54.0%
61.0%
85.0%
81.1%
61.5%
74.5%
68.3%
65.6%
71.6%
84.0%
57.1%
27.8%
54.5%
54.8%
77.5%
66.7%
76.6%
46.2%
35.0%
52.5%
46.0%
39.0%
15.0%
18.9%
38.5%
25.5%
31.7%
34.4%
28.4%
16.0%
42.9%
72.2%
45.5%
45.2%
22.5%
33.3%
23.4%
53.8%
16
38
53
12
120
25
47
29
128
21
43.8%
47.4%
60.4%
41.7%
80.0%
32.0%
55.3%
58.6%
78.9%
76.2%
56.3%
52.6%
39.6%
58.3%
20.0%
68.0%
44.7%
41.4%
21.1%
23.8%
SES wide
4920
66.4%
33.6%
Agency
Page 53
Q24h Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...participated in Action Learning?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
233
232
0.0%
26.6%
18.1%
100.0%
73.4%
81.9%
261
58
282
248
329
11.9%
25.9%
18.1%
16.5%
19.8%
88.1%
74.1%
81.9%
83.5%
80.2%
57
409
109
100
120
147
166
188
324
157
210
182
21
18
11
30
72
12
293
13
14.0%
14.9%
5.5%
8.0%
22.5%
19.0%
25.3%
19.7%
32.1%
17.8%
40.5%
20.3%
28.6%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
23.6%
8.3%
20.8%
7.7%
86.0%
85.1%
94.5%
92.0%
77.5%
81.0%
74.7%
80.3%
67.9%
82.2%
59.5%
79.7%
71.4%
94.4%
100.0%
100.0%
76.4%
91.7%
79.2%
92.3%
16
36
52
12
117
25
45
30
127
21
0.0%
16.7%
11.5%
16.7%
33.3%
4.0%
17.8%
13.3%
26.8%
9.5%
100.0%
83.3%
88.5%
83.3%
66.7%
96.0%
82.2%
86.7%
73.2%
90.5%
SES wide
4858
20.0%
80.0%
Agency
Page 54
Q24i Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...completed an Executive Development Plan?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Humanities
11
234
238
18.2%
44.9%
42.4%
81.8%
55.1%
57.6%
259
60
283
250
333
45.2%
75.0%
36.0%
25.6%
36.6%
54.8%
25.0%
64.0%
74.4%
63.4%
58
411
112
100
120
148
168
189
330
157
214
187
21
18
11
31
73
12
293
13
31.0%
32.6%
14.3%
34.0%
60.8%
54.1%
78.6%
51.3%
82.7%
26.1%
51.4%
73.3%
47.6%
27.8%
27.3%
25.8%
35.6%
41.7%
79.5%
92.3%
69.0%
67.4%
85.7%
66.0%
39.2%
45.9%
21.4%
48.7%
17.3%
73.9%
48.6%
26.7%
52.4%
72.2%
72.7%
74.2%
64.4%
58.3%
20.5%
7.7%
16
38
53
12
119
25
47
30
127
20
12.5%
63.2%
35.8%
66.7%
91.6%
44.0%
29.8%
26.7%
24.4%
40.0%
87.5%
36.8%
64.2%
33.3%
8.4%
56.0%
70.2%
73.3%
75.6%
60.0%
SES wide
4904
48.2%
51.8%
Agency
Page 55
Q24j Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...attended a short-term training program for
executives?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
237
238
9.1%
61.6%
59.2%
90.9%
38.4%
40.8%
259
60
283
251
332
61.0%
66.7%
45.9%
62.5%
54.5%
39.0%
33.3%
54.1%
37.5%
45.5%
60
410
113
100
120
148
50.0%
60.2%
40.7%
65.0%
86.7%
79.1%
50.0%
39.8%
59.3%
35.0%
13.3%
20.9%

169
189
329
157
214
187
21
18
10
31
72
12
68.6%
82.0%
60.8%
65.0%
82.2%
58.3%
61.9%
16.7%
20.0%
48.4%
44.4%
50.0%
31.4%
18.0%
39.2%
35.0%
17.8%
41.7%
38.1%
83.3%
80.0%
51.6%
55.6%
50.0%

Humanities
297
13
76.4%
46.2%
23.6%
53.8%
16
38
53
56.3%
71.1%
81.1%
43.8%
28.9%
18.9%

SES wide
12
120
25
47
30
128
21
4915
75.0%
74.2%
80.0%
48.9%
70.0%
80.5%
57.1%
63.6%
25.0%
25.8%
20.0%
51.1%
30.0%
19.5%
42.9%
36.4%
Agency
Page 56
Q24k Since becoming a member of the SES, have

you...taken an online training course?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
236
239
81.8%
83.5%
69.9%
18.2%
16.5%
30.1%
260
59
283
251
333
64.6%
78.0%
74.6%
73.7%
71.5%
35.4%
22.0%
25.4%
26.3%
28.5%
60
409
113
100
119
147
169
55.0%
67.5%
64.6%
56.0%
61.3%
61.9%
78.1%
45.0%
32.5%
35.4%
44.0%
38.7%
38.1%
21.9%

189
329
158
215
187
21
18
10
31
72
12
296
64.0%
67.5%
77.2%
80.5%
73.8%
66.7%
83.3%
40.0%
51.6%
73.6%
41.7%
73.0%
36.0%
32.5%
22.8%
19.5%
26.2%
33.3%
16.7%
60.0%
48.4%
26.4%
58.3%
27.0%

Humanities
13
76.9%
23.1%
16
38
53
12
43.8%
65.8%
67.9%
83.3%
56.3%
34.2%
32.1%
16.7%
119
25
47
30
127
21
4912
77.3%
60.0%
72.3%
63.3%
70.9%
47.6%
70.0%
22.7%
40.0%
27.7%
36.7%
29.1%
52.4%
30.0%
Agency

SES wide
Page 57

who answered "yes on question #24a. All
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
SES wide
Q25a How effective was this for your continued development...received a

360-type assessment
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
5
104
111
20.0%
29.8%
24.3%
0.0%
32.7%
35.1%
40.0%
23.1%
33.3%
40.0%
8.7%
5.4%
0.0%
5.8%
1.8%
131
31
143
103
110
16.0%
22.6%
21.7%
28.2%
25.5%
33.6%
35.5%
35.0%
37.9%
35.5%
32.1%
16.1%
29.4%
27.2%
26.4%
11.5%
9.7%
5.6%
3.9%
5.5%
6.9%
16.1%
8.4%
2.9%
7.3%
44
155
83
52
65
77
86
133
308
83
198
102
13.6%
22.6%
9.6%
19.2%
20.0%
33.8%
10.5%
19.5%
14.9%
20.5%
11.1%
21.6%
18.2%
29.0%
18.1%
34.6%
32.3%
27.3%
38.4%
36.1%
30.2%
33.7%
20.2%
38.2%
47.7%
34.2%
36.1%
28.8%
33.8%
32.5%
27.9%
30.1%
29.5%
31.3%
29.3%
34.3%
9.1%
8.4%
18.1%
7.7%
12.3%
6.5%
17.4%
10.5%
14.0%
10.8%
18.7%
2.0%
11.4%
5.8%
18.1%
9.6%
1.5%
0.0%
5.8%
3.8%
11.4%
3.6%
20.7%
3.9%
20
5
1
15
24
5
30.0%
40.0%
100.0%
33.3%
25.0%
40.0%
20.0%
60.0%
0.0%
40.0%
37.5%
20.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
26.7%
16.7%
20.0%
15.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
20.0%
197
26.4%
39.6%
24.4%
7.6%
2.0%
12
19
31
2
96
14
13
17
74
14
2702
16.7%
26.3%
32.3%
0.0%
20.8%
35.7%
46.2%
35.3%
39.2%
14.3%
21.5%
41.7%
31.6%
38.7%
0.0%
38.5%
50.0%
15.4%
17.6%
23.0%
28.6%
32.0%
25.0%
36.8%
22.6%
0.0%
31.3%
7.1%
23.1%
29.4%
27.0%
35.7%
29.5%
16.7%
0.0%
3.2%
50.0%
5.2%
7.1%
7.7%
5.9%
9.5%
21.4%
9.9%
0.0%
5.3%
3.2%
50.0%
4.2%
0.0%
7.7%
11.8%
1.4%
0.0%
7.1%
Page 58

who answered "yes on question #24b. All
Q25b How effective was this for your continued development...been on a

developmental assignment lasting more than 30 days
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
49
26
49.0%
50.0%
32.7%
34.6%
16.3%
15.4%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

22
7
48
30
58
22.7%
28.6%
58.3%
63.3%
44.8%
40.9%
42.9%
31.3%
23.3%
27.6%
36.4%
0.0%
10.4%
6.7%
17.2%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
6.7%
6.9%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
5
35
11
6
9
26
28
21
93
26
52
46
60.0%
45.7%
54.5%
33.3%
66.7%
57.7%
53.6%
61.9%
51.6%
46.2%
25.0%
65.2%
20.0%
31.4%
36.4%
66.7%
11.1%
23.1%
25.0%
19.0%
39.8%
30.8%
44.2%
21.7%
20.0%
20.0%
9.1%
0.0%
22.2%
15.4%
14.3%
9.5%
4.3%
15.4%
19.2%
4.3%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
9.5%
2.2%
3.8%
9.6%
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
2.2%
3.8%
1.9%
2.2%

Commission
1
1
1
17
1
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
47.1%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
35.3%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
17.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
59
54.2%
32.2%
13.6%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
2
4
11
1
55
3
6
6
32
1
100.0%
100.0%
45.5%
100.0%
56.4%
100.0%
66.7%
66.7%
78.1%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
45.5%
0.0%
32.7%
0.0%
16.7%
33.3%
15.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SES wide
802
52.1%
31.2%
11.8%
3.5%
1.4%
Agency
Page 59

who answered "yes on question #24c. All
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q25c How effective was this for your continued development...had a

mentor advising you for developmental purposes?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
66
49
37.9%
30.6%
40.9%
42.9%
16.7%
18.4%
1.5%
8.2%
3.0%
0.0%
63
7
62
63
68
33.3%
42.9%
32.3%
49.2%
44.1%
33.3%
42.9%
43.5%
25.4%
38.2%
27.0%
0.0%
21.0%
20.6%
14.7%
4.8%
14.3%
0.0%
3.2%
2.9%
1.6%
0.0%
3.2%
1.6%
0.0%
11
85
15
18
52
50
34
69
118
34
109
57
54.5%
44.7%
46.7%
44.4%
40.4%
20.0%
32.4%
34.8%
33.9%
44.1%
31.2%
29.8%
27.3%
40.0%
33.3%
27.8%
38.5%
46.0%
47.1%
44.9%
38.1%
41.2%
32.1%
45.6%
9.1%
11.8%
20.0%
22.2%
17.3%
26.0%
17.6%
13.0%
22.0%
11.8%
23.9%
19.3%
9.1%
1.2%
0.0%
5.6%
3.8%
8.0%
2.9%
5.8%
5.1%
2.9%
7.3%
5.3%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.8%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
4
2
4
1
27
4
50.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
40.7%
25.0%
25.0%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
44.4%
75.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
104
35.6%
39.4%
21.2%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3
15
15
1
79
4
7
9
49
2
1377
33.3%
46.7%
26.7%
0.0%
20.3%
25.0%
42.9%
55.6%
46.9%
50.0%
36.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
100.0%
46.8%
50.0%
0.0%
22.2%
34.7%
50.0%
38.7%
66.7%
26.7%
26.7%
0.0%
24.1%
25.0%
57.1%
11.1%
16.3%
0.0%
19.5%
0.0%
6.7%
6.7%
0.0%
7.6%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
2.0%
0.0%
4.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Page 60

who answered "yes on question #24d. All
Q25d How effective was this for your continued development...received

formal executive coaching?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
75
77
52.0%
24.7%
28.0%
39.0%
8.0%
22.1%
5.3%
9.1%
6.7%
5.2%

89
16
79
83
59
30.3%
50.0%
31.6%
43.4%
32.2%
31.5%
25.0%
31.6%
34.9%
37.3%
19.1%
12.5%
26.6%
8.4%
22.0%
13.5%
6.3%
6.3%
9.6%
6.8%
5.6%
6.3%
3.8%
3.6%
1.7%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
12
73
15
16
43
70
40
83
144
55
110
87
25.0%
32.9%
46.7%
25.0%
23.3%
30.0%
32.5%
26.5%
23.6%
21.8%
30.0%
32.2%
16.7%
27.4%
26.7%
50.0%
27.9%
37.1%
32.5%
38.6%
30.6%
41.8%
29.1%
27.6%
25.0%
32.9%
6.7%
18.8%
32.6%
21.4%
30.0%
20.5%
27.8%
23.6%
20.0%
27.6%
16.7%
5.5%
0.0%
6.3%
14.0%
7.1%
2.5%
13.3%
10.4%
9.1%
16.4%
9.2%
16.7%
1.4%
20.0%
0.0%
2.3%
4.3%
2.5%
1.2%
7.6%
3.6%
4.5%
3.4%

Commission
2
3
4
9
37
3
0.0%
66.7%
50.0%
55.6%
32.4%
33.3%
50.0%
0.0%
25.0%
11.1%
45.9%
33.3%
0.0%
33.3%
0.0%
33.3%
16.2%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
5.4%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
161
35.4%
30.4%
22.4%
8.1%
3.7%

Administration
66.7%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Humanities
1
7
18
1
83
8
6
14
53
5
100.0%
14.3%
61.1%
0.0%
19.3%
37.5%
50.0%
21.4%
32.1%
0.0%
0.0%
57.1%
11.1%
100.0%
33.7%
62.5%
0.0%
14.3%
34.0%
60.0%
0.0%
28.6%
11.1%
0.0%
30.1%
0.0%
33.3%
42.9%
18.9%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
13.3%
0.0%
16.7%
7.1%
9.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
5.7%
20.0%
1657
31.6%
32.5%
22.3%
9.3%
4.3%
Agency
SES wide
Page 61

who answered "yes on question #24e. All
Q25e How effective was this for your continued development...attended a

residential executive development program?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective

1
68
73
100.0%
39.7%
41.1%
0.0%
36.8%
30.1%
0.0%
17.6%
23.3%
0.0%
2.9%
4.1%
0.0%
2.9%
1.4%

89
16
40
69
79
23.6%
43.8%
35.0%
52.2%
38.0%
44.9%
43.8%
47.5%
40.6%
40.5%
25.8%
12.5%
10.0%
7.2%
13.9%
4.5%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
6.3%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
12
100
16
33
72
83
39
95
120
43
66
46
33.3%
28.0%
43.8%
51.5%
41.7%
31.3%
46.2%
30.5%
46.7%
53.5%
27.3%
56.5%
33.3%
39.0%
31.3%
21.2%
40.3%
49.4%
38.5%
52.6%
30.8%
27.9%
40.9%
26.1%
33.3%
24.0%
18.8%
15.2%
11.1%
18.1%
10.3%
11.6%
20.0%
16.3%
24.2%
17.4%
0.0%
9.0%
6.3%
9.1%
5.6%
0.0%
5.1%
4.2%
2.5%
2.3%
6.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
1.4%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%

Commission
12
3
2
6
9
9
41.7%
66.7%
50.0%
66.7%
33.3%
22.2%
41.7%
33.3%
50.0%
33.3%
55.6%
55.6%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
22.2%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
107
37.4%
42.1%
14.0%
3.7%
2.8%

Administration
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Humanities
1
18
21
4
40
4
13
15
55
9
100.0%
66.7%
42.9%
0.0%
27.5%
25.0%
46.2%
40.0%
50.9%
55.6%
0.0%
27.8%
14.3%
50.0%
47.5%
50.0%
30.8%
26.7%
32.7%
33.3%
0.0%
5.6%
38.1%
0.0%
10.0%
25.0%
15.4%
33.3%
12.7%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
25.0%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
2.5%
0.0%
7.7%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
1508
39.5%
38.4%
16.9%
4.0%
1.1%
Agency
SES wide
Page 62
(Note: This question was only seen

by those who answered "yes on
question #24f. All others skipped
this question.)
Q25f How effective was this for your continued development...taken a

sabbatical?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
33.3%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
OSD, Joint Staff, Defense
Agencies, and DoD Field Activities
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Services
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
60.0%
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Department of State
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
75.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
66.7%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SES wide
42
54.8%
31.0%
11.9%
0.0%
2.4%
Agency
Page 63

who answered "yes on question #24g. All
Q25g How effective was this for your continued development...served as a

mentor?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
8
157
142
25.0%
32.5%
26.1%
62.5%
46.5%
40.1%
12.5%
17.2%
23.2%
0.0%
3.2%
8.5%
0.0%
0.6%
2.1%
149
44
178
164
213
30.9%
25.0%
22.5%
30.5%
36.2%
45.0%
43.2%
39.9%
38.4%
39.0%
14.8%
22.7%
25.8%
23.8%
17.8%
6.7%
9.1%
10.1%
5.5%
6.1%
2.7%
0.0%
1.7%
1.8%
0.9%
39
183
59
57
98
118
104
136
222
30.8%
29.0%
25.4%
29.8%
45.9%
31.4%
36.5%
32.4%
26.1%
25.6%
44.8%
40.7%
40.4%
31.6%
49.2%
40.4%
40.4%
46.4%
20.5%
18.6%
23.7%
19.3%
16.3%
14.4%
13.5%
21.3%
19.8%
10.3%
6.6%
5.1%
7.0%
4.1%
4.2%
7.7%
4.4%
6.3%
12.8%
1.1%
5.1%
3.5%
2.0%
0.8%
1.9%
1.5%
1.4%
Commission
101
149
150
26.7%
43.0%
30.0%
43.6%
40.3%
37.3%
17.8%
13.4%
26.0%
8.9%
2.7%
4.0%
3.0%
0.7%
2.7%
12
4
41.7%
50.0%
25.0%
50.0%
16.7%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
6
17
53
8
50.0%
5.9%
28.3%
12.5%
16.7%
41.2%
52.8%
75.0%
33.3%
47.1%
17.0%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
223
37.7%
40.8%
15.7%
4.9%
0.9%
0.0%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
4
17
31
4
94
8
25
15
98
16
3152
50.0%
29.4%
51.6%
25.0%
22.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
36.7%
31.3%
31.2%
50.0%
41.2%
35.5%
50.0%
54.3%
75.0%
36.0%
33.3%
35.7%
25.0%
41.8%
0.0%
23.5%
6.5%
0.0%
21.3%
25.0%
24.0%
26.7%
20.4%
37.5%
19.4%
0.0%
5.9%
3.2%
25.0%
2.1%
0.0%
8.0%
0.0%
6.1%
6.3%
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Agency
Page 64

who answered "yes on question #24h. All
Q25h How effective was this for your continued development...participated

in Action Learning?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective
61
39
24.6%
15.4%
42.6%
28.2%
23.0%
41.0%
8.2%
10.3%
1.6%
5.1%

29
12
47
34
56
3.4%
8.3%
2.1%
14.7%
23.2%
55.2%
50.0%
53.2%
44.1%
50.0%
24.1%
33.3%
27.7%
35.3%
25.0%
17.2%
8.3%
4.3%
5.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.8%
0.0%
1.8%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
8
60
6
8
27
26
38
35
99
25
80
36
37.5%
35.0%
0.0%
37.5%
14.8%
11.5%
23.7%
31.4%
19.2%
16.0%
12.5%
16.7%
25.0%
35.0%
16.7%
50.0%
48.1%
65.4%
42.1%
40.0%
44.4%
40.0%
42.5%
19.4%
37.5%
23.3%
66.7%
12.5%
33.3%
19.2%
26.3%
22.9%
27.3%
32.0%
31.3%
47.2%
0.0%
5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
3.8%
7.9%
5.7%
5.1%
12.0%
7.5%
11.1%
0.0%
1.7%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
6.3%
5.6%

Commission
6
1
17
1
33.3%
0.0%
23.5%
0.0%
33.3%
100.0%
52.9%
100.0%
16.7%
0.0%
23.5%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
59
20.3%
42.4%
30.5%
6.8%
0.0%

Administration
1
5
6
2
38
1
7
4
32
1
0.0%
80.0%
50.0%
50.0%
13.2%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
18.8%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
44.7%
0.0%
57.1%
75.0%
59.4%
100.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
28.9%
100.0%
42.9%
0.0%
18.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SES wide
913
19.2%
43.7%
28.0%
6.6%
2.5%
Agency
Page 65

who answered "yes on question #24i. All
Q25i How effective was this for your continued development...completed an

Executive Development Plan?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective

2
102
99
0.0%
13.7%
8.1%
50.0%
38.2%
33.3%
50.0%
30.4%
26.3%
0.0%
9.8%
22.2%
0.0%
7.8%
10.1%

105
44
96
56
118
5.7%
9.1%
5.2%
19.6%
6.8%
28.6%
25.0%
31.3%
39.3%
34.7%
35.2%
29.5%
44.8%
30.4%
37.3%
18.1%
20.5%
10.4%
7.1%
11.0%
12.4%
15.9%
8.3%
3.6%
10.2%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
14
127
13
30
71
76
127
93
262
38
105
132
21.4%
18.1%
0.0%
10.0%
14.1%
5.3%
9.4%
16.1%
7.3%
18.4%
11.4%
8.3%
21.4%
34.6%
30.8%
26.7%
26.8%
32.9%
18.1%
34.4%
22.5%
44.7%
34.3%
17.4%
42.9%
27.6%
46.2%
33.3%
35.2%
38.2%
32.3%
25.8%
28.2%
26.3%
34.3%
34.1%
7.1%
10.2%
15.4%
20.0%
16.9%
13.2%
15.0%
15.1%
21.0%
2.6%
13.3%
28.0%
7.1%
9.4%
7.7%
10.0%
7.0%
10.5%
25.2%
8.6%
21.0%
7.9%
6.7%
12.1%

10
5
3
8
25
5
20.0%
0.0%
33.3%
12.5%
16.0%
0.0%
50.0%
20.0%
0.0%
25.0%
48.0%
60.0%
10.0%
40.0%
33.3%
12.5%
24.0%
20.0%
10.0%
20.0%
33.3%
37.5%
12.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
20.0%

Administration
222
8.1%
20.3%
34.2%
22.5%
14.9%

Administration
12
0.0%
41.7%
41.7%
8.3%
8.3%

Humanities
2
22
17
8
108
10
14
8
29
8
0.0%
18.2%
17.6%
25.0%
3.7%
0.0%
21.4%
50.0%
37.9%
12.5%
0.0%
22.7%
41.2%
12.5%
33.3%
10.0%
21.4%
12.5%
41.4%
37.5%
50.0%
36.4%
17.6%
12.5%
25.9%
50.0%
28.6%
25.0%
10.3%
12.5%
0.0%
9.1%
17.6%
50.0%
21.3%
20.0%
21.4%
12.5%
6.9%
12.5%
50.0%
13.6%
5.9%
0.0%
15.7%
20.0%
7.1%
0.0%
3.4%
25.0%
SES wide
2252
10.5%
28.8%
31.5%
16.8%
12.4%
Agency
Page 66

who answered "yes on question #24j. All
Q25j How effective was this for your continued development...attended a

short-term training program for executives?
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective

1
143
136
0.0%
16.1%
16.2%
100.0%
46.2%
35.3%
0.0%
23.8%
30.1%
0.0%
7.7%
14.7%
0.0%
6.3%
3.7%

156
40
127
153
172
21.8%
10.0%
17.3%
20.3%
22.7%
42.3%
40.0%
43.3%
43.1%
47.1%
24.4%
32.5%
29.9%
22.9%
20.3%
9.6%
12.5%
7.1%
10.5%
7.0%
1.9%
5.0%
2.4%
3.3%
2.9%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
29
241
46
63
101
115
113
152
196
100
172
106
13.8%
21.2%
17.4%
25.4%
32.7%
31.3%
21.2%
20.4%
18.9%
18.0%
18.6%
19.8%
24.1%
33.6%
30.4%
36.5%
40.6%
40.9%
36.3%
51.3%
45.9%
44.0%
45.9%
38.7%
48.3%
29.0%
26.1%
22.2%
13.9%
25.2%
27.4%
19.1%
23.0%
24.0%
21.5%
27.4%
13.8%
14.9%
15.2%
12.7%
11.9%
1.7%
12.4%
7.2%
9.7%
13.0%
8.1%
10.4%
0.0%
1.2%
10.9%
3.2%
1.0%
0.9%
2.7%
2.0%
2.6%
1.0%
5.8%
3.8%

13
3
2
14
31
6
38.5%
0.0%
50.0%
28.6%
25.8%
0.0%
30.8%
33.3%
50.0%
42.9%
48.4%
66.7%
15.4%
66.7%
0.0%
21.4%
19.4%
33.3%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
6.5%
0.0%
7.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Administration
222
21.6%
45.0%
22.5%
9.9%
0.9%

Administration
Agency
60.0%
0.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Humanities
9
26
40
9
87
18
23
20
103
12
0.0%
34.6%
25.0%
11.1%
13.8%
5.6%
17.4%
30.0%
30.1%
33.3%
44.4%
26.9%
27.5%
11.1%
51.7%
33.3%
52.2%
50.0%
44.7%
25.0%
22.2%
34.6%
32.5%
33.3%
28.7%
44.4%
30.4%
15.0%
14.6%
41.7%
33.3%
3.8%
12.5%
22.2%
4.6%
16.7%
0.0%
5.0%
7.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
22.2%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
SES wide
3051
21.0%
42.0%
24.6%
9.7%
2.6%
Page 67

who answered "yes on question #24k. All
Q25k How effective was this for your continued development...taken an online
training course
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Effective
Mostly
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Slightly
Effective
Not at All
Effective

9
194
165
22.2%
5.7%
4.8%
11.1%
31.4%
23.6%
33.3%
38.1%
35.8%
11.1%
16.5%
24.8%
22.2%
8.2%
10.9%

164
45
209
180
237
7.3%
6.7%
3.3%
8.3%
7.2%
34.8%
22.2%
30.6%
27.2%
26.2%
32.9%
37.8%
40.2%
25.6%
30.4%
20.7%
20.0%
16.7%
23.9%
24.9%
4.3%
13.3%
9.1%
15.0%
11.4%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
30
271
72
55
71
91
129
119
217
121
168
138
13.3%
11.8%
4.2%
16.4%
8.5%
6.6%
8.5%
10.9%
9.7%
6.6%
10.1%
5.1%
16.7%
29.2%
19.4%
30.9%
26.8%
23.1%
23.3%
35.3%
35.5%
21.5%
31.0%
26.8%
33.3%
33.2%
40.3%
29.1%
33.8%
34.1%
33.3%
31.9%
27.6%
37.2%
33.9%
39.9%
23.3%
19.6%
25.0%
16.4%
23.9%
29.7%
26.4%
17.6%
18.9%
22.3%
17.3%
18.8%
13.3%
6.3%
11.1%
7.3%
7.0%
6.6%
8.5%
4.2%
8.3%
12.4%
7.7%
9.4%

14
15
4
16
51
4
7.1%
0.0%
25.0%
12.5%
11.8%
0.0%
42.9%
26.7%
25.0%
31.3%
29.4%
50.0%
21.4%
53.3%
0.0%
12.5%
31.4%
25.0%
14.3%
6.7%
50.0%
43.8%
19.6%
25.0%
14.3%
13.3%
0.0%
0.0%
7.8%
0.0%

Administration
214
7.9%
32.7%
34.6%
18.7%
6.1%

Administration
10
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
30.0%
10.0%

Humanities
6
25
35
10
92
14
34
19
89
10
0.0%
16.0%
5.7%
10.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2.9%
10.5%
12.4%
10.0%
50.0%
32.0%
28.6%
30.0%
35.9%
28.6%
26.5%
21.1%
37.1%
20.0%
50.0%
32.0%
34.3%
30.0%
31.5%
35.7%
47.1%
47.4%
36.0%
50.0%
0.0%
8.0%
22.9%
20.0%
23.9%
35.7%
20.6%
15.8%
10.1%
20.0%
0.0%
12.0%
8.6%
10.0%
6.5%
0.0%
2.9%
5.3%
4.5%
0.0%
3384
7.9%
29.2%
34.0%
20.4%
8.5%
Agency
SES wide
Page 68
Q26 My organization provides managers with the training needed to

successfully manage a diverse workforce.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Agency
11
9.1%
54.5%
18.2%
9.1%
9.1%
236
14.8%
53.4%
15.7%
13.6%
2.5%
239
20.9%
41.0%
22.6%
15.1%
0.4%
259
12.4%
45.9%
22.8%
18.1%
0.8%
60
13.3%
35.0%
36.7%
13.3%
1.7%
281
11.0%
47.3%
25.6%
12.8%
3.2%
250
16.0%
47.6%
21.6%
13.6%
1.2%

Development
332
13.9%
40.1%
25.0%
19.0%
2.1%
61
8.2%
29.5%
26.2%
27.9%
8.2%
410
20.5%
40.0%
20.2%
16.1%
3.2%
Department of Labor
112
10.7%
37.5%
30.4%
16.1%
5.4%
Department of State
100
17.0%
47.0%
21.0%
13.0%
2.0%
119
22.7%
49.6%
13.4%
13.4%
0.8%
144
20.1%
60.4%
15.3%
4.2%
0.0%
168
18.5%
51.8%
14.3%
14.3%
1.2%
185
17.3%
54.6%
16.8%
10.8%
0.5%
329
20.4%
51.1%
16.1%
9.7%
2.7%
157
17.8%
43.3%
22.3%
14.0%
2.5%
214
26.6%
53.3%
12.6%
6.5%
0.9%
187
9.6%
52.4%
21.4%
15.0%
1.6%
21
9.5%
52.4%
14.3%
23.8%
0.0%
18
16.7%
22.2%
38.9%
22.2%
0.0%
11
9.1%
18.2%
36.4%
27.3%
9.1%
31
9.7%
45.2%
22.6%
19.4%
3.2%
75
21.3%
50.7%
10.7%
16.0%
1.3%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
12
16.7%
58.3%
8.3%
16.7%
0.0%
296
24.3%
53.0%
16.2%
6.4%
0.0%
13
7.7%
61.5%
23.1%
7.7%
0.0%
16
12.5%
31.3%
31.3%
18.8%
6.3%
38
13.2%
60.5%
13.2%
13.2%
0.0%
53
18.9%
52.8%
13.2%
15.1%
0.0%
12
16.7%
50.0%
16.7%
16.7%
0.0%
120
32.5%
56.7%
9.2%
1.7%
0.0%
24
0.0%
50.0%
29.2%
20.8%
0.0%
47
6.4%
55.3%
17.0%
17.0%
4.3%
30
6.7%
40.0%
36.7%
10.0%
6.7%
127
26.0%
48.0%
12.6%
11.0%
2.4%

SES wide
21
4903
4.8%
17.4%
57.1%
47.8%
14.3%
19.6%
19.0%
13.4%
4.8%
1.9%
Page 69
Agency
Q27 My agency is able to attract high quality senior executives.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
233
238
18.2%
15.9%
10.5%
45.5%
47.2%
51.3%
27.3%
25.3%
20.2%
9.1%
8.6%
14.3%
0.0%
3.0%
3.8%
259
58
18.5%
19.0%
49.0%
46.6%
18.5%
17.2%
10.0%
12.1%
3.9%
5.2%
Development
279
248
331
11.5%
25.4%
19.0%
46.6%
39.9%
49.5%
25.4%
19.0%
18.4%
12.9%
10.9%
9.7%
3.6%
4.8%
3.3%
59
406
10.2%
34.5%
16.9%
41.4%
33.9%
16.0%
27.1%
4.9%
11.9%
3.2%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
110
97
119
146
167
184
325
155
213
183
14.5%
38.1%
26.1%
20.5%
19.2%
35.3%
20.9%
32.3%
19.2%
16.4%
44.5%
44.3%
47.9%
48.6%
40.1%
46.2%
56.3%
40.0%
38.5%
62.3%
21.8%
9.3%
16.0%
19.9%
21.6%
11.4%
14.2%
16.1%
19.2%
14.8%
12.7%
6.2%
8.4%
8.9%
12.0%
4.3%
8.0%
7.7%
14.6%
4.9%
6.4%
2.1%
1.7%
2.1%
7.2%
2.7%
0.6%
3.9%
8.5%
1.6%
21
16
11
31
74
12
0.0%
43.8%
0.0%
54.8%
33.8%
41.7%
23.8%
31.3%
54.5%
32.3%
43.2%
58.3%
28.6%
18.8%
36.4%
6.5%
14.9%
0.0%
19.0%
6.3%
0.0%
6.5%
8.1%
0.0%
28.6%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
294
33.0%
45.9%
14.3%
6.1%
0.7%
13
23.1%
61.5%
7.7%
7.7%
0.0%
16
38
53
31.3%
23.7%
32.1%
56.3%
50.0%
43.4%
0.0%
23.7%
15.1%
6.3%
2.6%
7.5%
6.3%
0.0%
1.9%

SES wide
11
118
24
46
30
124
21
4856
45.5%
42.4%
33.3%
15.2%
3.3%
22.6%
19.0%
23.4%
36.4%
44.9%
37.5%
58.7%
46.7%
51.6%
42.9%
46.4%
18.2%
11.0%
16.7%
13.0%
36.7%
14.5%
23.8%
18.0%
0.0%
0.8%
12.5%
13.0%
10.0%
8.1%
14.3%
9.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
3.2%
0.0%
3.3%
Page 70
Agency
Q28 My agency is able to retain high quality senior executives.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
232
238
18.2%
18.5%
13.4%
36.4%
49.6%
49.2%
45.5%
20.3%
23.5%
0.0%
8.6%
12.2%
0.0%
3.0%
1.7%
259
58
17.4%
19.0%
46.7%
48.3%
18.9%
22.4%
13.1%
8.6%
3.9%
1.7%
Development
279
245
330
9.7%
19.2%
16.1%
47.3%
41.6%
41.2%
29.4%
23.3%
22.7%
10.4%
11.4%
15.8%
3.2%
4.5%
4.2%
60
404
11.7%
23.5%
18.3%
45.0%
36.7%
15.3%
21.7%
13.9%
11.7%
2.2%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
111
98
120
146
166
185
327
155
212
184
16.2%
31.6%
26.7%
18.5%
22.9%
33.5%
17.1%
29.7%
12.3%
22.8%
49.5%
44.9%
43.3%
47.9%
45.2%
45.9%
50.5%
39.4%
35.8%
59.2%
20.7%
14.3%
18.3%
19.2%
21.1%
14.1%
18.7%
20.0%
25.0%
11.4%
8.1%
7.1%
10.0%
12.3%
6.6%
4.9%
11.3%
5.2%
18.4%
5.4%
5.4%
2.0%
1.7%
2.1%
4.2%
1.6%
2.4%
5.8%
8.5%
1.1%
21
18
11
31
74
12
4.8%
16.7%
9.1%
45.2%
29.7%
66.7%
38.1%
44.4%
63.6%
25.8%
43.2%
33.3%
38.1%
33.3%
9.1%
25.8%
17.6%
0.0%
14.3%
5.6%
18.2%
0.0%
8.1%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
1.4%
0.0%
295
26.8%
46.8%
18.6%
6.1%
1.7%
13
7.7%
76.9%
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
53
31.3%
31.6%
20.8%
43.8%
57.9%
45.3%
18.8%
7.9%
26.4%
6.3%
2.6%
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%

SES wide
12
120
24
45
30
124
21
4861
41.7%
48.3%
12.5%
13.3%
3.3%
25.8%
14.3%
21.1%
33.3%
41.7%
41.7%
46.7%
36.7%
54.8%
38.1%
45.6%
25.0%
9.2%
16.7%
17.8%
33.3%
9.7%
23.8%
19.8%
0.0%
0.8%
29.2%
20.0%
20.0%
4.8%
14.3%
10.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
6.7%
4.8%
9.5%
3.1%
Page 71
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q29 SES pay and benefits are helpful in attracting high quality senior
executives.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
11
235
237
9.1%
9.4%
10.5%
9.1%
26.4%
16.9%
18.2%
20.4%
18.1%
45.5%
26.8%
30.8%
18.2%
17.0%
23.6%
256
58
280
247
331
7.4%
8.6%
10.0%
12.6%
12.4%
24.6%
36.2%
25.0%
31.6%
33.5%
18.8%
15.5%
16.8%
21.9%
18.1%
25.4%
27.6%
27.9%
22.3%
22.1%
23.8%
12.1%
20.4%
11.7%
13.9%
61
401
110
95
119
146
167
185
329
154
211
182
18.0%
17.2%
10.9%
11.6%
10.1%
6.8%
12.6%
8.6%
7.3%
9.1%
7.6%
14.8%
31.1%
37.4%
32.7%
29.5%
17.6%
13.7%
25.1%
19.5%
24.0%
38.3%
18.5%
31.9%
23.0%
15.5%
15.5%
20.0%
16.0%
12.3%
21.6%
15.1%
14.6%
18.2%
15.2%
17.0%
9.8%
18.2%
27.3%
21.1%
32.8%
38.4%
28.1%
33.0%
32.5%
23.4%
28.0%
25.3%
18.0%
11.7%
13.6%
17.9%
23.5%
28.8%
12.6%
23.8%
21.6%
11.0%
30.8%
11.0%
20
17
10
30
73
12
15.0%
11.8%
10.0%
13.3%
13.7%
16.7%
35.0%
52.9%
40.0%
13.3%
19.2%
41.7%
20.0%
23.5%
20.0%
33.3%
11.0%
8.3%
15.0%
11.8%
20.0%
30.0%
32.9%
33.3%
15.0%
0.0%
10.0%
10.0%
23.3%
0.0%
292
6.8%
20.9%
22.3%
29.8%
20.2%
13
7.7%
46.2%
15.4%
23.1%
7.7%
16
38
53
12
117
24
47
30
127
21
4850
37.5%
15.8%
15.1%
8.3%
8.5%
8.3%
14.9%
16.7%
14.2%
33.3%
11.1%
25.0%
28.9%
35.8%
25.0%
28.2%
50.0%
34.0%
46.7%
29.1%
14.3%
27.4%
18.8%
15.8%
15.1%
16.7%
23.9%
12.5%
14.9%
20.0%
23.6%
23.8%
18.0%
18.8%
18.4%
20.8%
16.7%
27.4%
20.8%
23.4%
13.3%
22.8%
19.0%
26.1%
0.0%
21.1%
13.2%
33.3%
12.0%
8.3%
12.8%
3.3%
10.2%
9.5%
17.5%
Page 72
Agency
Q30 SES pay and benefits are helpful in retaining high quality senior
executives.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
235
238
9.1%
8.9%
10.5%
9.1%
26.0%
20.2%
27.3%
23.4%
20.2%
36.4%
26.4%
30.3%
18.2%
15.3%
18.9%
256
58
7.8%
12.1%
23.0%
36.2%
23.4%
13.8%
25.8%
31.0%
19.9%
6.9%
Development
279
248
331
11.5%
12.1%
13.6%
21.5%
28.2%
28.1%
22.6%
21.8%
20.8%
26.2%
26.2%
24.5%
18.3%
11.7%
13.0%
61
402
19.7%
18.7%
29.5%
32.1%
21.3%
13.4%
11.5%
22.4%
18.0%
13.4%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
110
96
118
146
167
185
327
155
210
183
10.9%
11.5%
10.2%
6.8%
12.0%
8.6%
7.3%
11.6%
7.6%
14.8%
33.6%
24.0%
17.8%
13.7%
25.1%
17.3%
22.0%
28.4%
15.7%
30.1%
20.0%
17.7%
16.9%
15.8%
24.6%
20.0%
15.3%
27.1%
19.5%
19.7%
22.7%
32.3%
30.5%
34.9%
28.1%
30.3%
33.9%
24.5%
27.6%
23.5%
12.7%
14.6%
24.6%
28.8%
10.2%
23.8%
21.4%
8.4%
29.5%
12.0%
20
18
11
30
74
12
15.0%
11.1%
9.1%
13.3%
14.9%
8.3%
30.0%
61.1%
36.4%
13.3%
18.9%
41.7%
15.0%
16.7%
18.2%
26.7%
14.9%
8.3%
35.0%
11.1%
27.3%
36.7%
29.7%
41.7%
5.0%
0.0%
9.1%
10.0%
21.6%
0.0%
293
7.8%
19.5%
23.9%
32.8%
16.0%
13
7.7%
46.2%
15.4%
23.1%
7.7%
16
38
52
31.3%
15.8%
15.4%
25.0%
26.3%
26.9%
18.8%
18.4%
17.3%
25.0%
23.7%
30.8%
0.0%
15.8%
9.6%

SES wide
12
119
24
46
30
127
21
4855
8.3%
7.6%
8.3%
15.2%
13.3%
13.4%
33.3%
11.4%
33.3%
29.4%
37.5%
34.8%
40.0%
31.5%
9.5%
25.2%
8.3%
23.5%
8.3%
13.0%
23.3%
26.0%
14.3%
20.1%
16.7%
30.3%
33.3%
26.1%
16.7%
21.3%
33.3%
27.2%
33.3%
9.2%
12.5%
10.9%
6.7%
7.9%
9.5%
16.0%
Page 73
Agency
Q31 The SES application process discourages high quality candidates from
applying.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
237
239
18.2%
11.4%
21.8%
45.5%
28.3%
33.1%
36.4%
30.0%
21.3%
0.0%
26.6%
21.8%
0.0%
3.8%
2.1%
259
15.8%
32.8%
24.3%
24.3%
2.7%
Development
59
282
251
333
11.9%
16.0%
19.5%
11.4%
28.8%
31.2%
30.3%
21.9%
32.2%
30.5%
30.7%
26.7%
23.7%
19.1%
17.1%
34.2%
3.4%
3.2%
2.4%
5.7%
60
13.3%
38.3%
28.3%
20.0%
0.0%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
411
111
100
120
147
168
185
331
157
213
187
8.0%
17.1%
14.0%
12.5%
16.3%
13.1%
9.7%
16.6%
15.9%
15.5%
12.3%
21.4%
29.7%
21.0%
33.3%
31.3%
28.0%
24.3%
25.1%
26.8%
31.9%
32.1%
33.3%
32.4%
36.0%
27.5%
21.1%
32.1%
35.1%
28.7%
28.0%
28.6%
32.6%
28.7%
19.8%
26.0%
23.3%
27.9%
19.6%
25.9%
26.3%
24.8%
20.7%
19.3%
8.5%
0.9%
3.0%
3.3%
3.4%
7.1%
4.9%
3.3%
4.5%
3.3%
3.7%
21
18
11
31
75
12
19.0%
11.1%
18.2%
6.5%
24.0%
16.7%
28.6%
27.8%
45.5%
22.6%
21.3%
16.7%
23.8%
27.8%
9.1%
41.9%
26.7%
25.0%
23.8%
27.8%
27.3%
22.6%
24.0%
41.7%
4.8%
5.6%
0.0%
6.5%
4.0%
0.0%
296
13.9%
25.0%
33.8%
24.7%
2.7%
13
15.4%
46.2%
15.4%
15.4%
7.7%
16
38
6.3%
21.1%
18.8%
23.7%
56.3%
34.2%
18.8%
15.8%
0.0%
5.3%

SES wide
53
12
120
24
47
30
127
21
4910
9.4%
8.3%
7.5%
12.5%
2.1%
16.7%
7.1%
9.5%
13.8%
35.8%
41.7%
20.8%
12.5%
27.7%
30.0%
29.9%
23.8%
27.7%
32.1%
16.7%
31.7%
45.8%
29.8%
23.3%
33.1%
38.1%
29.9%
13.2%
33.3%
35.8%
25.0%
31.9%
30.0%
22.0%
19.0%
24.5%
9.4%
0.0%
4.2%
4.2%
8.5%
0.0%
7.9%
9.5%
4.1%
Page 74

who answered strongly agree or agree on
question.)
Agency
Q32a The SES application process is discouraging due to...writing ECQs for
QRB
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Strongly
Agree nor
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

7
92
131
28.6%
42.4%
47.3%
57.1%
50.0%
44.3%
14.3%
3.3%
6.1%
0.0%
3.3%
1.5%
0.0%
1.1%
0.8%
126
24
133
41.3%
41.7%
42.1%
50.0%
54.2%
49.6%
6.3%
0.0%
5.3%
2.4%
4.2%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Development
Department of Labor
125
111
52.0%
45.0%
40.8%
39.6%
4.8%
6.3%
2.4%
3.6%
0.0%
5.4%
31
121
52
51.6%
55.4%
57.7%
35.5%
37.2%
34.6%
6.5%
5.0%
5.8%
6.5%
2.5%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
33
55
70
69
63
134
67
100
83
54.5%
41.8%
34.3%
47.8%
39.7%
53.7%
49.3%
48.0%
42.2%
39.4%
52.7%
48.6%
47.8%
49.2%
41.0%
43.3%
40.0%
49.4%
6.1%
0.0%
8.6%
2.9%
7.9%
1.5%
3.0%
9.0%
8.4%
0.0%
1.8%
4.3%
1.4%
3.2%
3.7%
4.5%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
10
7
7
9
34
4
60.0%
57.1%
42.9%
55.6%
58.8%
50.0%
20.0%
42.9%
57.1%
44.4%
32.4%
50.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
115
54.8%
40.0%
4.3%
0.0%
0.9%
37.5%
62.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4
17
24
6
50.0%
64.7%
37.5%
66.7%
50.0%
29.4%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
5.9%
20.8%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
34
6
14
14
47
7
2029
41.2%
50.0%
42.9%
57.1%
44.7%
57.1%
47.6%
47.1%
33.3%
50.0%
42.9%
42.6%
42.9%
43.6%
8.8%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
5.5%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Page 75

question.)
Agency
Q32b The SES application process is discouraging due to...the interview

process
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

7
94
131
0.0%
1.1%
4.6%
0.0%
11.7%
10.7%
42.9%
25.5%
20.6%
42.9%
53.2%
55.0%
14.3%
8.5%
9.2%
125
3.2%
9.6%
32.8%
40.8%
13.6%
Development
24
133
124
110
4.2%
3.0%
4.8%
9.1%
4.2%
12.8%
12.1%
19.1%
33.3%
27.8%
33.9%
25.5%
54.2%
49.6%
36.3%
37.3%
4.2%
6.8%
12.9%
9.1%
31
0.0%
6.5%
32.3%
54.8%
6.5%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
121
50
35
55
69
68
63
136
67
101
83
4.1%
4.0%
5.7%
1.8%
5.8%
5.9%
4.8%
2.9%
7.5%
10.9%
3.6%
8.3%
8.0%
2.9%
20.0%
8.7%
14.7%
12.7%
14.7%
10.4%
18.8%
16.9%
29.8%
30.0%
25.7%
21.8%
21.7%
32.4%
28.6%
26.5%
29.9%
20.8%
27.7%
44.6%
56.0%
57.1%
40.0%
53.6%
39.7%
41.3%
43.4%
38.8%
40.6%
41.0%
13.2%
2.0%
8.6%
16.4%
10.1%
7.4%
12.7%
12.5%
13.4%
8.9%
10.8%
10
7
6
9
33
4
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
22.2%
12.1%
0.0%
20.0%
14.3%
16.7%
0.0%
15.2%
0.0%
30.0%
42.9%
50.0%
22.2%
21.2%
25.0%
40.0%
42.9%
16.7%
33.3%
45.5%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
22.2%
6.1%
50.0%
114
1.8%
7.9%
31.6%
45.6%
13.2%
12.5%
25.0%
0.0%
50.0%
12.5%
4
17
0.0%
5.9%
0.0%
5.9%
50.0%
41.2%
25.0%
29.4%
25.0%
17.6%

SES wide
24
6
33
6
14
14
47
7
2024
8.3%
0.0%
3.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
4.7%
16.7%
0.0%
12.1%
16.7%
0.0%
14.3%
23.4%
28.6%
12.3%
29.2%
16.7%
33.3%
0.0%
35.7%
21.4%
23.4%
14.3%
27.7%
33.3%
66.7%
39.4%
66.7%
57.1%
50.0%
40.4%
57.1%
44.8%
12.5%
16.7%
12.1%
0.0%
7.1%
14.3%
8.5%
0.0%
10.6%
Page 76

question.)
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q32c The SES application process is discouraging due to...lack of information

re: vacancies
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
7
93
131
14.3%
10.8%
6.1%
28.6%
33.3%
30.5%
42.9%
26.9%
28.2%
14.3%
28.0%
32.1%
0.0%
1.1%
3.1%
125
24
131
124
110
13.6%
8.3%
8.4%
16.1%
18.2%
28.0%
25.0%
29.0%
33.1%
30.9%
28.0%
25.0%
30.5%
24.2%
25.5%
26.4%
41.7%
29.0%
23.4%
20.9%
4.0%
0.0%
3.1%
3.2%
4.5%
30
120
51
34
55
67
68
63
135
67
100
83
13.3%
9.2%
7.8%
14.7%
9.1%
16.4%
11.8%
14.3%
13.3%
11.9%
18.0%
8.4%
33.3%
26.7%
47.1%
26.5%
29.1%
23.9%
29.4%
25.4%
28.1%
32.8%
35.0%
27.7%
20.0%
31.7%
21.6%
35.3%
27.3%
28.4%
27.9%
30.2%
29.6%
23.9%
18.0%
34.9%
30.0%
25.0%
21.6%
20.6%
27.3%
31.3%
25.0%
28.6%
25.9%
26.9%
25.0%
26.5%
3.3%
7.5%
2.0%
2.9%
7.3%
0.0%
5.9%
1.6%
3.0%
4.5%
4.0%
2.4%
10
7
7
9
34
20.0%
14.3%
14.3%
11.1%
11.8%
30.0%
42.9%
42.9%
0.0%
35.3%
20.0%
14.3%
42.9%
33.3%
26.5%
30.0%
28.6%
0.0%
55.6%
23.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
25.0%
25.0%
25.0%
25.0%
114
5.3%
21.9%
39.5%
27.2%
6.1%
0.0%
37.5%
25.0%
37.5%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
0.0%
17
24
6
33
6
14
14
46
7
2017
5.9%
8.3%
16.7%
9.1%
16.7%
7.1%
7.1%
0.0%
14.3%
11.2%
5.9%
33.3%
0.0%
21.2%
16.7%
35.7%
28.6%
30.4%
28.6%
29.2%
23.5%
25.0%
33.3%
45.5%
16.7%
35.7%
35.7%
32.6%
42.9%
28.8%
47.1%
25.0%
33.3%
24.2%
50.0%
14.3%
21.4%
32.6%
14.3%
27.0%
17.6%
8.3%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
7.1%
4.3%
0.0%
3.9%
Page 77
Agency
Q33 I understand the SES performance appraisal system being used in this
organization.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
234
236
9.1%
19.7%
23.7%
45.5%
53.0%
52.1%
18.2%
16.2%
10.2%
18.2%
9.0%
11.9%
9.1%
2.1%
2.1%
258
59
279
249
331
19.8%
18.6%
21.9%
25.3%
22.1%
61.6%
55.9%
57.0%
53.8%
50.2%
9.7%
11.9%
11.5%
9.6%
10.3%
7.4%
10.2%
7.5%
7.6%
12.7%
1.6%
3.4%
2.2%
3.6%
4.8%
59
409
111
99
119
145
168
183
16.9%
24.0%
13.5%
19.2%
22.7%
20.7%
21.4%
30.6%
25.4%
57.5%
44.1%
57.6%
61.3%
57.9%
55.4%
60.7%
16.9%
7.1%
13.5%
8.1%
10.1%
11.7%
7.7%
5.5%
20.3%
8.6%
20.7%
12.1%
5.0%
9.0%
13.7%
2.2%
20.3%
2.9%
8.1%
3.0%
0.8%
0.7%
1.8%
1.1%

Commission
329
156
211
183
23.1%
17.9%
17.5%
14.8%
55.9%
57.1%
51.7%
50.8%
10.3%
12.8%
12.8%
14.8%
6.7%
10.9%
12.3%
14.2%
4.0%
1.3%
5.7%
5.5%
21
23.8%
38.1%
4.8%
19.0%
14.3%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
18
11
31
74
12
11.1%
36.4%
22.6%
25.7%
33.3%
61.1%
45.5%
38.7%
51.4%
66.7%
16.7%
0.0%
19.4%
9.5%
0.0%
5.6%
18.2%
19.4%
9.5%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
0.0%
294
20.7%
56.1%
8.8%
9.9%
4.4%
13
15.4%
61.5%
15.4%
7.7%
0.0%
16
38
53
12
118
24
47
30
125
43.8%
23.7%
37.7%
50.0%
33.1%
4.2%
19.1%
20.0%
34.4%
43.8%
55.3%
34.0%
33.3%
50.0%
50.0%
53.2%
53.3%
56.0%
12.5%
7.9%
9.4%
0.0%
5.9%
33.3%
6.4%
16.7%
6.4%
0.0%
13.2%
13.2%
8.3%
5.9%
12.5%
19.1%
3.3%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
5.7%
8.3%
5.1%
0.0%
2.1%
6.7%
1.6%
21
4871
28.6%
22.6%
47.6%
54.0%
0.0%
10.3%
9.5%
9.6%
14.3%
3.5%

SES wide
Page 78
Agency
Q34 My performance evaluation takes into account the most important parts of
my job.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
235
238
9.1%
16.6%
17.2%
63.6%
48.1%
42.4%
18.2%
12.8%
16.0%
9.1%
17.0%
18.5%
0.0%
5.5%
5.9%
259
60
282
249
331
17.0%
21.7%
17.0%
19.3%
18.7%
51.4%
50.0%
50.0%
49.0%
45.9%
13.9%
18.3%
17.0%
14.9%
13.0%
15.1%
8.3%
12.4%
11.6%
16.6%
2.7%
1.7%
3.5%
5.2%
5.7%
61
411
111
100
119
11.5%
22.1%
15.3%
28.0%
15.1%
21.3%
50.9%
43.2%
46.0%
55.5%
16.4%
12.4%
15.3%
12.0%
16.0%
36.1%
12.2%
15.3%
10.0%
10.1%
14.8%
2.4%
10.8%
4.0%
3.4%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
147
167
184
330
157
214
184
15.6%
22.2%
26.1%
21.5%
24.8%
15.0%
10.9%
59.2%
44.3%
54.9%
46.4%
45.2%
39.7%
49.5%
11.6%
13.8%
11.4%
13.3%
19.1%
14.0%
16.3%
10.9%
11.4%
6.0%
16.1%
7.0%
25.7%
16.8%
2.7%
8.4%
1.6%
2.7%
3.8%
5.6%
6.5%
21
18
11
31
75
12
19.0%
22.2%
36.4%
19.4%
21.3%
33.3%
52.4%
50.0%
54.5%
51.6%
50.7%
50.0%
9.5%
22.2%
0.0%
16.1%
9.3%
8.3%
14.3%
5.6%
9.1%
9.7%
18.7%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
296
24.0%
49.3%
13.5%
10.1%
3.0%
13
30.8%
53.8%
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
16
38
52
12
120
23
43.8%
23.7%
23.1%
41.7%
29.2%
4.3%
43.8%
55.3%
30.8%
41.7%
43.3%
69.6%
12.5%
7.9%
17.3%
0.0%
13.3%
17.4%
0.0%
13.2%
23.1%
8.3%
10.0%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
8.3%
4.2%
4.3%

SES wide
47
30
127
21
4897
19.1%
23.3%
37.0%
19.0%
20.5%
51.1%
46.7%
44.1%
38.1%
47.9%
12.8%
13.3%
8.7%
23.8%
13.8%
12.8%
10.0%
9.4%
9.5%
13.7%
4.3%
6.7%
0.8%
9.5%
4.2%
Page 79
Q35 I received a performance plan in the

first few months of the performance
cycle.
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
11
235
238
54.5%
74.0%
79.8%
45.5%
26.0%
20.2%
258
60
282
249
333
61
410
75.2%
91.7%
84.8%
88.0%
77.5%
47.5%
89.3%
24.8%
8.3%
15.2%
12.0%
22.5%
52.5%
10.7%
Department of Labor
Department of State
110
100
118
147
166
184
330
157
214
185
21
18
80.0%
64.0%
84.7%
82.3%
69.3%
88.6%
84.5%
77.7%
86.0%
92.4%
47.6%
55.6%
20.0%
36.0%
15.3%
17.7%
30.7%
11.4%
15.5%
22.3%
14.0%
7.6%
52.4%
44.4%

11
31
75
12
296
13
16
38
53
12
120
23
63.6%
96.8%
85.3%
91.7%
90.2%
76.9%
75.0%
81.6%
79.2%
100.0%
100.0%
65.2%
36.4%
3.2%
14.7%
8.3%
9.8%
23.1%
25.0%
18.4%
20.8%
0.0%
0.0%
34.8%

SES wide
47
30
127
21
4896
70.2%
56.7%
94.5%
81.0%
82.3%
29.8%
43.3%
5.5%
19.0%
17.7%
Agency
Page 80
Q36 I had a discussion about progress

on my performance plan at mid-year in
the performance cycle.
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No
11
45.5%
54.5%
Field Activities
235
238
87.7%
88.2%
12.3%
11.8%
259
60
281
72.6%
88.3%
79.4%
27.4%
11.7%
20.6%

Department of Labor
Department of State
249
331
61
411
110
100
120
147
165
183
331
157
85.9%
73.1%
50.8%
68.9%
80.9%
63.0%
69.2%
74.1%
75.8%
86.3%
87.3%
79.6%
14.1%
26.9%
49.2%
31.1%
19.1%
37.0%
30.8%
25.9%
24.2%
13.7%
12.7%
20.4%

214
185
21
18
11
31
75
12
295
13
16
38
83.6%
89.2%
81.0%
55.6%
54.5%
54.8%
72.0%
100.0%
94.6%
61.5%
50.0%
50.0%
16.4%
10.8%
19.0%
44.4%
45.5%
45.2%
28.0%
0.0%
5.4%
38.5%
50.0%
50.0%

SES wide
53
12
120
23
47
30
127
21
4894
79.2%
91.7%
91.7%
21.7%
72.3%
66.7%
96.1%
76.2%
79.3%
20.8%
8.3%
8.3%
78.3%
27.7%
33.3%
3.9%
23.8%
20.7%
Agency
Page 81
Q37a To what extent is your performance rating based on the following...The

performance of your organization
Total # of
Respondents
To a Very
Great
Extent
To a
Great
Extent
To a
Moderate
Extent
To a
Limited
Extent
Not at All

9
224
223
0.0%
22.3%
30.5%
33.3%
45.1%
35.4%
44.4%
20.5%
20.2%
11.1%
9.4%
11.7%
11.1%
2.7%
2.2%
248
57
269
19.0%
15.8%
20.1%
38.7%
38.6%
47.2%
25.4%
33.3%
21.6%
11.3%
8.8%
7.1%
5.6%
3.5%
4.1%

Development
Department of Labor
234
315
30.8%
27.6%
43.2%
41.3%
15.4%
19.0%
7.3%
7.3%
3.4%
4.8%
57
394
103
7.0%
29.4%
34.0%
40.4%
38.8%
36.9%
22.8%
18.3%
15.5%
15.8%
9.6%
4.9%
14.0%
3.8%
8.7%
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
90
118
142
155
180
318
148
207
177
30.0%
24.6%
19.0%
22.6%
28.9%
28.3%
23.0%
47.3%
14.7%
34.4%
41.5%
47.9%
38.1%
42.8%
43.1%
41.9%
31.9%
43.5%
16.7%
22.9%
25.4%
21.9%
20.0%
16.7%
20.9%
12.1%
26.6%
12.2%
10.2%
6.3%
11.0%
5.6%
10.1%
10.8%
7.7%
10.2%
6.7%
0.8%
1.4%
6.5%
2.8%
1.9%
3.4%
1.0%
5.1%
20
16
11
29
70
12
30.0%
50.0%
45.5%
34.5%
34.3%
50.0%
30.0%
31.3%
27.3%
37.9%
34.3%
41.7%
25.0%
12.5%
27.3%
13.8%
20.0%
8.3%
15.0%
6.3%
0.0%
6.9%
11.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
287
29.3%
41.5%
17.1%
9.8%
2.4%
33.3%
55.6%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
15
38
51
12
13.3%
47.4%
23.5%
33.3%
53.3%
26.3%
39.2%
41.7%
20.0%
18.4%
21.6%
8.3%
6.7%
5.3%
13.7%
8.3%
6.7%
2.6%
2.0%
8.3%

SES wide
117
21
44
30
125
21
4678
37.6%
9.5%
27.3%
16.7%
45.6%
19.0%
27.6%
43.6%
28.6%
45.5%
43.3%
36.0%
42.9%
40.6%
11.1%
38.1%
15.9%
23.3%
12.0%
28.6%
19.4%
6.8%
14.3%
9.1%
13.3%
4.0%
0.0%
8.9%
0.9%
9.5%
2.3%
3.3%
2.4%
9.5%
3.5%
Agency
Page 82
Agency
Q37b To what extent is your performance rating based on the following...Your

individual performance
To a Very
To a
To a
To a
Total # of
Great
Great
Moderate
Limited
Respondents
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Not at All

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
10
231
231
30.0%
35.9%
30.7%
50.0%
39.4%
44.2%
20.0%
10.8%
18.2%
0.0%
11.3%
5.2%
0.0%
2.6%
1.7%
252
57
269
242
324
32.5%
45.6%
28.6%
43.8%
34.6%
40.1%
35.1%
45.7%
36.0%
43.2%
17.1%
14.0%
17.5%
10.3%
11.4%
7.9%
3.5%
7.1%
7.0%
7.7%
2.4%
1.8%
1.1%
2.9%
3.1%
57
399
103
92
117
21.1%
44.4%
28.2%
50.0%
35.0%
38.6%
35.3%
40.8%
32.6%
41.9%
21.1%
13.0%
16.5%
9.8%
17.1%
12.3%
5.3%
9.7%
5.4%
6.0%
7.0%
2.0%
4.9%
2.2%
0.0%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
143
160
181
322
150
208
180
38.5%
40.0%
49.2%
38.2%
47.3%
25.0%
33.3%
44.1%
38.8%
39.2%
38.8%
38.7%
33.2%
36.7%
10.5%
11.3%
8.8%
13.0%
7.3%
19.7%
18.3%
7.0%
5.0%
2.8%
9.3%
4.0%
16.3%
7.8%
0.0%
5.0%
0.0%
0.6%
2.7%
5.8%
3.9%
21
17
11
29
71
12
33.3%
41.2%
45.5%
62.1%
36.6%
75.0%
42.9%
41.2%
36.4%
24.1%
36.6%
8.3%
4.8%
17.6%
18.2%
3.4%
23.9%
8.3%
19.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
2.8%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
289
40.1%
37.4%
14.2%
6.6%
1.7%
11
72.7%
27.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14
38
51
11
119
21
57.1%
39.5%
43.1%
54.5%
26.1%
33.3%
35.7%
39.5%
37.3%
18.2%
46.2%
61.9%
7.1%
15.8%
13.7%
27.3%
21.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
3.9%
0.0%
6.7%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

SES wide
45
30
126
21
4746
40.0%
46.7%
49.2%
42.9%
38.1%
31.1%
30.0%
36.5%
38.1%
38.9%
13.3%
13.3%
11.1%
0.0%
13.8%
13.3%
6.7%
2.4%
14.3%
7.1%
2.2%
3.3%
0.8%
4.8%
2.1%
Page 83
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q37c To what extent is your performance rating based on the

following...Customer perspective
To a Very
To a
To a
To a
Total # of
Great
Great
Moderate
Limited
Respondents
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Not at All
8
222
224
0.0%
11.3%
12.5%
37.5%
26.6%
31.7%
50.0%
33.3%
27.2%
0.0%
18.9%
22.3%
12.5%
9.9%
6.3%
248
51
258
234
310
12.9%
11.8%
10.1%
11.1%
12.3%
31.9%
29.4%
26.7%
32.9%
25.8%
27.8%
27.5%
31.4%
24.4%
27.1%
16.9%
13.7%
24.0%
17.1%
17.4%
10.5%
17.6%
7.8%
14.5%
17.4%
54
375
100
89
116
142
152
175
317
145
207
171
7.4%
11.5%
7.0%
21.3%
14.7%
9.2%
13.2%
17.7%
12.0%
14.5%
14.0%
5.3%
27.8%
27.2%
29.0%
28.1%
31.0%
32.4%
27.0%
40.0%
31.2%
28.3%
26.6%
25.7%
29.6%
25.1%
25.0%
21.3%
27.6%
28.9%
26.3%
25.1%
28.7%
29.0%
28.0%
28.7%
18.5%
21.6%
20.0%
18.0%
19.0%
21.8%
23.0%
12.6%
20.2%
20.0%
21.7%
26.3%
16.7%
14.7%
19.0%
11.2%
7.8%
7.7%
10.5%
4.6%
7.9%
8.3%
9.7%
14.0%
19
12
11
23
70
12
10.5%
25.0%
9.1%
13.0%
8.6%
0.0%
31.6%
16.7%
9.1%
34.8%
48.6%
25.0%
26.3%
0.0%
45.5%
8.7%
20.0%
50.0%
31.6%
16.7%
36.4%
26.1%
15.7%
8.3%
0.0%
41.7%
0.0%
17.4%
7.1%
16.7%
280
12.9%
35.0%
24.3%
20.4%
7.5%
11
9.1%
18.2%
63.6%
9.1%
0.0%
15
37
52
11
116
21
41
30
125
21
4580
20.0%
10.8%
9.6%
9.1%
9.5%
0.0%
7.3%
16.7%
20.8%
0.0%
12.2%
26.7%
13.5%
25.0%
27.3%
32.8%
38.1%
29.3%
23.3%
36.8%
57.1%
30.1%
20.0%
35.1%
34.6%
45.5%
25.0%
28.6%
31.7%
26.7%
20.0%
23.8%
27.2%
20.0%
21.6%
21.2%
18.2%
21.6%
28.6%
22.0%
20.0%
15.2%
9.5%
19.8%
13.3%
18.9%
9.6%
0.0%
11.2%
4.8%
9.8%
13.3%
7.2%
9.5%
10.7%
Page 84
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q37d To what extent is your performance rating based on the

following...Employee perspective
To a Very
To a
To a
To a
Total # of
Great
Great
Moderate
Limited
Respondents
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Not at All
9
219
222
0.0%
5.5%
5.0%
22.2%
21.5%
19.8%
44.4%
35.2%
33.3%
11.1%
25.6%
25.2%
22.2%
12.3%
16.7%
244
52
254
225
306
5.3%
5.8%
3.1%
5.3%
8.8%
20.1%
17.3%
18.5%
23.6%
17.0%
27.9%
38.5%
33.1%
33.3%
25.8%
29.5%
13.5%
28.3%
20.0%
24.8%
17.2%
25.0%
16.9%
17.8%
23.5%
55
382
99
91
116
142
154
179
318
142
207
167
3.6%
10.7%
2.0%
12.1%
8.6%
8.5%
5.8%
7.3%
9.4%
8.5%
5.3%
2.4%
20.0%
25.4%
20.2%
28.6%
18.1%
17.6%
19.5%
23.5%
20.8%
23.9%
16.4%
11.4%
30.9%
27.5%
22.2%
24.2%
28.4%
33.8%
30.5%
34.1%
34.3%
30.3%
33.8%
29.3%
27.3%
22.5%
25.3%
19.8%
30.2%
26.1%
25.3%
23.5%
24.5%
24.6%
28.5%
35.9%
18.2%
13.9%
30.3%
15.4%
14.7%
14.1%
18.8%
11.7%
11.0%
12.7%
15.9%
21.0%
17
12
11
28
71
11
0.0%
8.3%
9.1%
14.3%
4.2%
0.0%
23.5%
16.7%
9.1%
14.3%
23.9%
0.0%
23.5%
0.0%
36.4%
14.3%
33.8%
72.7%
47.1%
33.3%
45.5%
39.3%
25.4%
18.2%
5.9%
41.7%
0.0%
17.9%
12.7%
9.1%
277
6.1%
22.4%
27.8%
30.3%
13.4%
11
9.1%
18.2%
63.6%
9.1%
0.0%
14
38
51
11
114
21
39
30
123
21
4559
7.1%
5.3%
2.0%
9.1%
4.4%
0.0%
5.1%
3.3%
13.8%
0.0%
6.8%
28.6%
13.2%
29.4%
36.4%
21.1%
33.3%
15.4%
30.0%
28.5%
52.4%
21.1%
21.4%
36.8%
33.3%
18.2%
27.2%
19.0%
43.6%
23.3%
23.6%
28.6%
30.4%
14.3%
26.3%
23.5%
18.2%
33.3%
28.6%
23.1%
30.0%
22.0%
9.5%
25.9%
28.6%
18.4%
11.8%
18.2%
14.0%
19.0%
12.8%
13.3%
12.2%
9.5%
15.8%
Page 85
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q38 My last performance review helped me to identify my strengths.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
11
235
239
18.2%
8.9%
12.6%
45.5%
32.8%
35.6%
27.3%
30.2%
28.9%
9.1%
20.9%
16.3%
0.0%
7.2%
6.7%
258
58
282
248
332
5.8%
8.6%
5.7%
11.3%
10.5%
32.2%
46.6%
37.9%
41.9%
34.9%
27.1%
20.7%
28.0%
23.8%
26.2%
27.5%
17.2%
19.9%
14.5%
20.8%
7.4%
6.9%
8.5%
8.5%
7.5%
61
411
107
98
120
147
166
183
329
157
211
184
4.9%
13.9%
6.5%
17.3%
7.5%
6.8%
10.8%
8.7%
12.5%
10.8%
9.5%
7.6%
19.7%
36.7%
31.8%
28.6%
38.3%
32.0%
41.0%
52.5%
41.6%
48.4%
29.4%
31.0%
31.1%
24.6%
25.2%
29.6%
30.8%
31.3%
21.7%
21.9%
23.1%
21.0%
29.4%
28.3%
27.9%
20.4%
22.4%
18.4%
19.2%
24.5%
16.3%
12.6%
18.2%
14.0%
20.9%
24.5%
16.4%
4.4%
14.0%
6.1%
4.2%
5.4%
10.2%
4.4%
4.6%
5.7%
10.9%
8.7%
21
18
11
31
74
12
0.0%
5.6%
27.3%
9.7%
13.5%
16.7%
47.6%
16.7%
27.3%
41.9%
36.5%
50.0%
28.6%
50.0%
27.3%
19.4%
24.3%
25.0%
23.8%
22.2%
18.2%
25.8%
18.9%
8.3%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
3.2%
6.8%
0.0%
294
11.2%
42.5%
24.8%
17.7%
3.7%
12
33.3%
41.7%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
37
53
12
120
23
47
30
125
21
4877
12.5%
21.6%
11.3%
25.0%
13.3%
0.0%
4.3%
13.3%
21.6%
0.0%
10.6%
37.5%
35.1%
20.8%
50.0%
42.5%
34.8%
36.2%
30.0%
46.4%
42.9%
37.4%
25.0%
32.4%
37.7%
0.0%
25.8%
43.5%
27.7%
30.0%
19.2%
19.0%
26.2%
12.5%
10.8%
24.5%
8.3%
15.8%
17.4%
25.5%
6.7%
8.8%
28.6%
19.0%
12.5%
0.0%
5.7%
16.7%
2.5%
4.3%
6.4%
20.0%
4.0%
9.5%
6.7%
Page 86
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q39 My last performance review helped me to identify areas for improvement.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
11
9.1%
36.4%
36.4%
18.2%
0.0%
235
6.4%
34.9%
30.6%
20.4%
7.7%
239
4.6%
39.3%
31.4%
18.0%
6.7%
258
58
282
247
333
4.7%
3.4%
3.9%
8.5%
7.5%
29.8%
48.3%
34.4%
41.7%
31.8%
27.5%
29.3%
33.0%
26.7%
30.3%
29.8%
10.3%
20.2%
15.4%
22.5%
8.1%
8.6%
8.5%
7.7%
7.8%
61
410
108
98
119
147
166
183
328
157
211
184
6.6%
9.3%
4.6%
3.1%
4.2%
3.4%
8.4%
4.9%
9.1%
5.7%
7.6%
5.4%
16.4%
31.7%
25.0%
30.6%
33.6%
29.3%
35.5%
44.3%
36.9%
41.4%
30.3%
30.4%
32.8%
29.3%
32.4%
34.7%
37.0%
32.0%
30.7%
29.5%
27.1%
29.3%
26.5%
28.8%
26.2%
25.1%
25.0%
24.5%
20.2%
29.3%
16.9%
16.4%
21.3%
17.8%
24.6%
26.6%
18.0%
4.6%
13.0%
7.1%
5.0%
6.1%
8.4%
4.9%
5.5%
5.7%
10.9%
8.7%
21
18
11
31
74
12
0.0%
5.6%
18.2%
12.9%
10.8%
0.0%
38.1%
16.7%
36.4%
25.8%
41.9%
16.7%
42.9%
44.4%
36.4%
25.8%
24.3%
50.0%
19.0%
27.8%
9.1%
32.3%
16.2%
33.3%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
3.2%
6.8%
0.0%
294
6.8%
41.5%
29.6%
18.4%
3.7%
12
0.0%
50.0%
41.7%
8.3%
0.0%
16
37
53
12
119
23
47
30
126
21
4875
6.3%
13.5%
7.5%
16.7%
10.9%
0.0%
2.1%
10.0%
11.9%
0.0%
6.9%
31.3%
27.0%
11.3%
50.0%
47.9%
43.5%
34.0%
33.3%
41.3%
38.1%
35.1%
31.3%
45.9%
50.9%
8.3%
25.2%
30.4%
25.5%
33.3%
32.5%
28.6%
30.2%
18.8%
13.5%
24.5%
8.3%
13.4%
21.7%
31.9%
6.7%
9.5%
28.6%
21.0%
12.5%
0.0%
5.7%
16.7%
2.5%
4.3%
6.4%
16.7%
4.8%
4.8%
6.8%
Page 87
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q40 Discussions with my supervisor about my performance are worthwhile.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
11
27.3%
54.5%
9.1%
9.1%
0.0%
232
16.4%
48.7%
17.7%
9.5%
7.8%
232
21.1%
44.0%
17.2%
11.2%
6.5%
242
57
274
237
321
19.0%
10.5%
15.3%
24.5%
19.6%
45.5%
49.1%
43.1%
44.3%
36.1%
18.6%
19.3%
18.6%
14.3%
23.4%
11.2%
12.3%
16.1%
9.3%
11.8%
5.8%
8.8%
6.9%
7.6%
9.0%
53
387
101
92
103
142
160
177
323
151
208
184
13.2%
21.7%
16.8%
31.5%
27.2%
19.7%
17.5%
20.3%
20.4%
20.5%
20.2%
10.9%
34.0%
44.2%
38.6%
37.0%
47.6%
45.1%
43.8%
52.0%
39.9%
49.7%
46.6%
44.0%
30.2%
19.4%
18.8%
19.6%
16.5%
16.9%
20.0%
16.9%
18.6%
11.9%
16.3%
15.8%
13.2%
9.6%
14.9%
7.6%
8.7%
13.4%
10.6%
6.8%
14.6%
10.6%
9.1%
16.3%
9.4%
5.2%
10.9%
4.3%
0.0%
4.9%
8.1%
4.0%
6.5%
7.3%
7.7%
13.0%
21
16
10
31
72
12
9.5%
12.5%
20.0%
19.4%
26.4%
41.7%
52.4%
62.5%
20.0%
51.6%
41.7%
41.7%
19.0%
25.0%
40.0%
12.9%
13.9%
16.7%
14.3%
0.0%
10.0%
9.7%
13.9%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
10.0%
6.5%
4.2%
0.0%
289
26.0%
43.3%
18.7%
9.7%
2.4%
10
30.0%
60.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15
37
52
11
120
21
43
29
124
19
4697
20.0%
18.9%
25.0%
63.6%
20.0%
4.8%
9.3%
27.6%
31.5%
21.1%
20.4%
33.3%
45.9%
30.8%
9.1%
50.0%
52.4%
39.5%
31.0%
42.7%
36.8%
43.7%
33.3%
27.0%
23.1%
9.1%
18.3%
23.8%
23.3%
20.7%
15.3%
10.5%
18.3%
6.7%
5.4%
5.8%
18.2%
7.5%
19.0%
18.6%
13.8%
4.8%
26.3%
11.1%
6.7%
2.7%
15.4%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
9.3%
6.9%
5.6%
5.3%
6.5%
Page 88
Agency
Q41 Discussions with my supervisor about my development are worthwhile.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
222
221
27.3%
9.5%
12.2%
36.4%
39.2%
40.3%
27.3%
31.1%
25.8%
9.1%
11.3%
13.6%
0.0%
9.0%
8.1%
225
54
16.0%
9.3%
34.7%
33.3%
30.7%
29.6%
13.3%
16.7%
5.3%
11.1%
Development
261
221
297
12.6%
19.0%
15.2%
31.4%
38.0%
29.6%
32.2%
24.9%
30.3%
13.8%
11.3%
16.2%
10.0%
6.8%
8.8%
53
366
7.5%
17.2%
37.7%
37.7%
35.8%
25.7%
9.4%
12.8%
9.4%
6.6%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
90
85
100
139
152
172
312
142
199
174
13.3%
21.2%
24.0%
16.5%
16.4%
17.4%
15.7%
17.6%
16.1%
6.3%
32.2%
40.0%
44.0%
44.6%
33.6%
40.7%
37.5%
36.6%
44.7%
35.6%
28.9%
27.1%
22.0%
21.6%
26.3%
26.2%
23.4%
21.8%
19.1%
27.6%
12.2%
8.2%
8.0%
13.7%
14.5%
12.2%
16.0%
16.2%
12.6%
20.7%
13.3%
3.5%
2.0%
3.6%
9.2%
3.5%
7.4%
7.7%
7.5%
9.8%
19
13
10
28
68
11
10.5%
7.7%
20.0%
25.0%
23.5%
18.2%
31.6%
38.5%
10.0%
25.0%
39.7%
45.5%
42.1%
38.5%
40.0%
32.1%
17.6%
36.4%
10.5%
15.4%
30.0%
10.7%
11.8%
0.0%
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
7.4%
0.0%
283
19.8%
36.0%
29.0%
10.6%
4.6%
10
20.0%
40.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15
35
50
13.3%
20.0%
18.0%
20.0%
31.4%
22.0%
53.3%
37.1%
42.0%
0.0%
8.6%
2.0%
13.3%
2.9%
16.0%

SES wide
11
119
20
38
27
119
19
4463
54.5%
15.1%
10.0%
7.9%
22.2%
21.8%
10.5%
15.8%
0.0%
43.7%
25.0%
31.6%
37.0%
38.7%
36.8%
36.7%
18.2%
24.4%
45.0%
34.2%
22.2%
27.7%
15.8%
27.2%
18.2%
11.8%
20.0%
15.8%
11.1%
6.7%
31.6%
13.1%
9.1%
5.0%
0.0%
10.5%
7.4%
5.0%
5.3%
7.2%
Page 89
Agency
Q42 My performance appraisal is a fair reflection of my performance.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
232
231
9.1%
15.9%
17.7%
63.6%
45.3%
43.7%
27.3%
19.0%
19.0%
0.0%
12.1%
12.1%
0.0%
7.8%
7.4%
250
56
272
237
323
16.8%
28.6%
15.8%
27.8%
19.5%
39.6%
42.9%
48.5%
41.8%
39.6%
20.0%
10.7%
14.7%
13.9%
20.1%
16.4%
12.5%
13.6%
8.4%
13.3%
7.2%
5.4%
7.4%
8.0%
7.4%
61
396
101
92
111
14.8%
27.8%
12.9%
32.6%
17.1%
24.6%
44.7%
44.6%
43.5%
44.1%
18.0%
13.4%
17.8%
10.9%
19.8%
16.4%
9.3%
11.9%
8.7%
15.3%
26.2%
4.8%
12.9%
4.3%
3.6%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
146
162
178
322
149
207
180
12.3%
20.4%
19.1%
20.2%
26.2%
17.4%
9.4%
45.9%
46.3%
57.9%
45.7%
47.7%
38.6%
37.2%
20.5%
13.6%
15.7%
16.1%
14.1%
18.8%
23.9%
16.4%
10.5%
4.5%
12.1%
6.0%
15.0%
17.8%
4.8%
9.3%
2.8%
5.9%
6.0%
10.1%
11.7%
21
17
8
29
69
11
4.8%
47.1%
12.5%
41.4%
21.7%
45.5%
57.1%
47.1%
62.5%
41.4%
42.0%
54.5%
14.3%
5.9%
25.0%
13.8%
14.5%
0.0%
19.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.9%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
5.8%
0.0%
288
24.7%
41.7%
15.6%
12.5%
5.6%
11
54.5%
36.4%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
14
37
49
12
118
22
35.7%
18.9%
24.5%
66.7%
22.0%
9.1%
42.9%
48.6%
36.7%
8.3%
49.2%
63.6%
21.4%
18.9%
20.4%
0.0%
17.8%
22.7%
0.0%
13.5%
18.4%
8.3%
7.6%
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
3.4%
0.0%

SES wide
43
30
124
20
4721
11.6%
26.7%
40.3%
30.0%
21.2%
39.5%
36.7%
42.7%
30.0%
43.8%
23.3%
16.7%
11.3%
20.0%
16.7%
16.3%
6.7%
4.8%
10.0%
11.6%
9.3%
13.3%
0.8%
10.0%
6.7%
Page 90
Agency
Q43 To what extent is your salary increase linked to your performance rating?
To a Very
To a
To a
To a
Total # of
Great
Great
Moderate
Limited
Respondents
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Not at All

10
206
205
0.0%
16.5%
21.0%
10.0%
20.4%
25.4%
50.0%
11.2%
17.6%
10.0%
15.5%
10.7%
30.0%
36.4%
25.4%
242
50
18.6%
20.0%
18.6%
22.0%
11.2%
10.0%
11.2%
10.0%
40.5%
38.0%
Development
261
224
279
18.8%
28.1%
18.6%
22.2%
24.6%
20.8%
15.3%
10.3%
15.8%
12.3%
8.9%
11.1%
31.4%
28.1%
33.7%
54
347
29.6%
25.1%
18.5%
25.9%
9.3%
12.1%
13.0%
13.0%
29.6%
23.9%
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
101
80
103
130
145
175
296
139
188
159
23.8%
32.5%
21.4%
13.1%
26.2%
17.1%
22.6%
25.2%
23.4%
29.6%
15.8%
16.3%
15.5%
12.3%
20.7%
18.3%
23.6%
22.3%
17.0%
22.0%
14.9%
10.0%
14.6%
10.8%
13.8%
13.7%
12.2%
10.1%
5.9%
15.1%
14.9%
8.8%
20.4%
17.7%
13.8%
16.0%
11.5%
12.2%
15.4%
11.9%
30.7%
32.5%
28.2%
46.2%
25.5%
34.9%
30.1%
30.2%
38.3%
21.4%
19
13
9
22
60
11
26.3%
23.1%
0.0%
4.5%
16.7%
36.4%
21.1%
30.8%
33.3%
18.2%
23.3%
9.1%
0.0%
7.7%
11.1%
13.6%
15.0%
18.2%
26.3%
0.0%
33.3%
18.2%
20.0%
27.3%
26.3%
38.5%
22.2%
45.5%
25.0%
9.1%
258
22.1%
17.1%
11.2%
18.6%
31.0%
10
40.0%
0.0%
10.0%
10.0%
40.0%
13
34
42
15.4%
29.4%
21.4%
7.7%
26.5%
9.5%
0.0%
5.9%
9.5%
7.7%
29.4%
7.1%
69.2%
8.8%
52.4%

SES wide
12
111
21
40
27
108
18
4300
8.3%
35.1%
9.5%
17.5%
37.0%
34.3%
33.3%
22.6%
25.0%
26.1%
9.5%
25.0%
25.9%
34.3%
16.7%
21.0%
0.0%
15.3%
28.6%
15.0%
7.4%
8.3%
11.1%
12.6%
8.3%
9.0%
33.3%
2.5%
3.7%
5.6%
16.7%
13.1%
58.3%
14.4%
19.0%
40.0%
25.9%
17.6%
22.2%
30.7%
Page 91
Agency
Q44 To what extent is your performance award linked to your performance

rating?
To a Very
To a
To a
To a
Total # of
Great
Great
Moderate
Limited
Respondents
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Not at All

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
10
213
210
10.0%
22.1%
27.6%
40.0%
31.5%
34.8%
50.0%
16.4%
19.0%
0.0%
16.9%
10.0%
0.0%
13.1%
8.6%
242
52
261
222
286
29.3%
34.6%
26.8%
45.5%
30.1%
29.3%
40.4%
29.1%
28.8%
26.6%
13.2%
3.8%
17.2%
8.1%
17.5%
11.2%
11.5%
10.7%
8.1%
10.8%
16.9%
9.6%
16.1%
9.5%
15.0%
57
356
102
86
106
42.1%
36.0%
31.4%
53.5%
37.7%
26.3%
32.3%
29.4%
15.1%
31.1%
8.8%
9.0%
11.8%
10.5%
12.3%
7.0%
6.5%
12.7%
4.7%
12.3%
15.8%
16.3%
14.7%
16.3%
6.6%

Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
131
152
177
302
141
196
164
22.9%
34.2%
31.1%
36.8%
31.9%
36.2%
37.2%
34.4%
30.9%
35.0%
27.2%
36.2%
29.1%
29.3%
19.1%
17.1%
13.6%
13.2%
9.9%
12.8%
14.6%
18.3%
9.2%
10.7%
12.3%
9.9%
13.3%
7.3%
5.3%
8.6%
9.6%
10.6%
12.1%
8.7%
11.6%
19
16
9
24
64
10
36.8%
43.8%
11.1%
16.7%
32.8%
70.0%
36.8%
37.5%
22.2%
41.7%
32.8%
10.0%
0.0%
6.3%
11.1%
16.7%
12.5%
0.0%
21.1%
6.3%
22.2%
8.3%
12.5%
10.0%
5.3%
6.3%
33.3%
16.7%
9.4%
10.0%
269
34.6%
26.0%
12.6%
11.5%
15.2%
10
50.0%
30.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13
36
46
12
114
19
46.2%
58.3%
32.6%
25.0%
54.4%
10.5%
7.7%
19.4%
21.7%
41.7%
30.7%
52.6%
15.4%
11.1%
17.4%
0.0%
7.9%
21.1%
7.7%
8.3%
15.2%
0.0%
6.1%
5.3%
23.1%
2.8%
13.0%
33.3%
0.9%
10.5%

SES wide
41
27
112
19
4403
24.4%
44.4%
46.4%
31.6%
34.2%
29.3%
33.3%
26.8%
31.6%
30.0%
12.2%
18.5%
10.7%
10.5%
13.4%
7.3%
3.7%
4.5%
10.5%
10.3%
26.8%
0.0%
11.6%
15.8%
12.2%
Page 92
Agency
Q45 I understand how my most recent salary increase was determined.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

11
231
236
0.0%
13.9%
17.4%
18.2%
36.8%
33.1%
27.3%
24.7%
28.8%
36.4%
16.0%
11.0%
18.2%
8.7%
9.7%
256
57
277
14.8%
17.5%
18.4%
43.4%
31.6%
33.6%
25.8%
24.6%
20.6%
11.3%
15.8%
13.7%
4.7%
10.5%
13.7%

Development
Department of Labor
246
330
24.0%
14.8%
31.7%
26.7%
25.6%
24.2%
10.6%
16.7%
8.1%
17.6%
61
404
108
13.1%
14.4%
7.4%
18.0%
28.7%
34.3%
34.4%
24.5%
25.0%
18.0%
21.0%
19.4%
16.4%
11.4%
13.9%
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
97
118
145
167
182
327
153
210
182
17.5%
16.1%
13.1%
17.4%
26.9%
19.3%
19.0%
15.7%
13.7%
29.9%
28.8%
33.1%
24.6%
44.5%
36.7%
34.0%
31.4%
31.3%
23.7%
33.9%
31.7%
27.5%
17.0%
19.6%
22.9%
24.3%
25.3%
14.4%
13.6%
12.4%
15.6%
4.9%
14.7%
15.0%
14.8%
20.9%
14.4%
7.6%
9.7%
15.0%
6.6%
9.8%
9.2%
13.8%
8.8%
21
17
11
30
71
12
14.3%
35.3%
27.3%
16.7%
16.9%
50.0%
28.6%
17.6%
27.3%
33.3%
25.4%
33.3%
33.3%
35.3%
27.3%
23.3%
25.4%
8.3%
14.3%
11.8%
9.1%
16.7%
16.9%
8.3%
9.5%
0.0%
9.1%
10.0%
15.5%
0.0%
292
15.4%
27.4%
26.4%
21.6%
9.2%
12
33.3%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
16.7%
16
37
51
12
31.3%
16.2%
27.5%
16.7%
18.8%
35.1%
23.5%
33.3%
31.3%
29.7%
21.6%
25.0%
6.3%
18.9%
13.7%
16.7%
12.5%
0.0%
13.7%
8.3%

SES wide
120
23
46
30
124
21
4826
35.8%
17.4%
15.2%
36.7%
24.2%
28.6%
18.0%
37.5%
21.7%
34.8%
6.7%
37.1%
23.8%
32.3%
16.7%
30.4%
34.8%
36.7%
26.6%
28.6%
24.8%
8.3%
21.7%
8.7%
13.3%
7.3%
4.8%
14.7%
1.7%
8.7%
6.5%
6.7%
4.8%
14.3%
10.2%
Page 93
Agency
Q46 I understand how my most recent performance award was determined.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
233
236
9.1%
11.6%
13.6%
36.4%
38.2%
39.8%
27.3%
22.7%
25.8%
18.2%
20.2%
14.4%
9.1%
7.3%
6.4%
256
58
277
246
331
14.5%
22.4%
17.0%
24.8%
14.8%
50.4%
36.2%
38.6%
36.6%
30.5%
16.0%
25.9%
19.9%
17.9%
24.2%
14.8%
12.1%
13.4%
14.6%
16.3%
4.3%
3.4%
11.2%
6.1%
14.2%
61
404
108
97
118
146
167
182
16.4%
15.3%
5.6%
17.5%
18.6%
11.0%
20.4%
25.3%
21.3%
33.7%
31.5%
21.6%
40.7%
47.9%
34.7%
48.9%
24.6%
21.3%
25.0%
28.9%
22.0%
21.9%
18.0%
15.4%
24.6%
19.3%
25.9%
17.5%
12.7%
12.3%
13.2%
4.9%
13.1%
10.4%
12.0%
14.4%
5.9%
6.8%
13.8%
5.5%

Commission
327
155
211
183
17.7%
20.0%
14.7%
12.0%
37.3%
38.7%
42.7%
33.9%
16.8%
18.7%
14.2%
20.8%
18.0%
14.8%
18.0%
24.0%
10.1%
7.7%
10.4%
9.3%
21
9.5%
42.9%
23.8%
14.3%
9.5%

Administration
Administration
Humanities
18
11
30
70
12
27.8%
27.3%
13.3%
20.0%
50.0%
44.4%
27.3%
23.3%
34.3%
16.7%
11.1%
27.3%
33.3%
25.7%
16.7%
16.7%
9.1%
20.0%
15.7%
8.3%
0.0%
9.1%
10.0%
4.3%
8.3%
291
19.9%
34.4%
17.9%
17.9%
10.0%
12
33.3%
41.7%
8.3%
0.0%
16.7%
16
37
51
12
120
23
46
30
124
43.8%
27.0%
15.7%
41.7%
37.5%
4.3%
13.0%
33.3%
22.6%
31.3%
48.6%
29.4%
25.0%
44.2%
30.4%
43.5%
26.7%
28.2%
18.8%
10.8%
21.6%
16.7%
9.2%
34.8%
26.1%
26.7%
33.9%
0.0%
13.5%
25.5%
8.3%
7.5%
21.7%
8.7%
13.3%
10.5%
6.3%
0.0%
7.8%
8.3%
1.7%
8.7%
8.7%
0.0%
4.8%
21
4834
23.8%
17.8%
14.3%
37.2%
33.3%
20.7%
14.3%
15.7%
14.3%
8.6%

SES wide
Page 94
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q47 I am held accountable for achieving results.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
11
235
233
45.5%
42.6%
47.6%
45.5%
51.1%
43.3%
0.0%
4.7%
5.6%
9.1%
1.3%
2.1%
0.0%
0.4%
1.3%
257
57
279
245
330
37.4%
50.9%
43.0%
53.1%
47.9%
49.8%
42.1%
46.2%
38.8%
43.3%
9.3%
5.3%
6.5%
4.9%
5.5%
2.7%
1.8%
2.2%
1.6%
2.1%
0.8%
0.0%
2.2%
1.6%
1.2%
59
401
107
95
119
145
165
180
326
153
211
183
32.2%
45.6%
41.1%
49.5%
47.9%
39.3%
50.3%
53.9%
61.3%
60.8%
57.3%
43.2%
50.8%
45.4%
50.5%
37.9%
44.5%
53.1%
38.8%
40.6%
33.7%
31.4%
36.5%
47.0%
11.9%
5.2%
5.6%
9.5%
5.9%
6.9%
6.7%
3.9%
3.7%
6.5%
4.3%
8.7%
0.0%
2.5%
0.9%
2.1%
1.7%
0.7%
3.0%
1.1%
0.9%
0.7%
0.9%
0.0%
5.1%
1.2%
1.9%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.6%
0.3%
0.7%
0.9%
1.1%
21
17
11
29
71
12
28.6%
47.1%
54.5%
51.7%
52.1%
91.7%
57.1%
47.1%
36.4%
37.9%
40.8%
8.3%
9.5%
5.9%
9.1%
0.0%
7.0%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
10.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
289
56.1%
36.7%
4.8%
2.1%
0.3%
11
54.5%
45.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
37
52
12
119
23
47
30
125
21
4817
37.5%
48.6%
40.4%
50.0%
47.1%
17.4%
40.4%
60.0%
57.6%
47.6%
48.8%
56.3%
48.6%
51.9%
41.7%
42.0%
82.6%
42.6%
30.0%
35.2%
42.9%
42.8%
6.3%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
9.2%
0.0%
10.6%
3.3%
4.0%
4.8%
5.7%
0.0%
2.7%
3.8%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
1.6%
4.8%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
6.7%
1.6%
0.0%
1.0%
Page 95
Agency
Q48 Did you participate in the development of your

performance plan?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
235
236
90.9%
88.9%
91.9%
9.1%
11.1%
8.1%
255
58
279
249
331
60
409
107
98
119
147
166
182
329
156
210
183
21
18
11
30
71
12
292
12
16
37
52
12
120
23
46
30
125
21
93.3%
98.3%
88.9%
92.4%
89.1%
83.3%
75.6%
86.0%
93.9%
99.2%
95.9%
93.4%
99.5%
95.4%
86.5%
62.4%
98.9%
71.4%
66.7%
81.8%
76.7%
95.8%
100.0%
98.6%
75.0%
62.5%
62.2%
98.1%
91.7%
83.3%
87.0%
95.7%
86.7%
93.6%
95.2%
6.7%
1.7%
11.1%
7.6%
10.9%
16.7%
24.4%
14.0%
6.1%
0.8%
4.1%
6.6%
0.5%
4.6%
13.5%
37.6%
1.1%
28.6%
33.3%
18.2%
23.3%
4.2%
0.0%
1.4%
25.0%
37.5%
37.8%
1.9%
8.3%
16.7%
13.0%
4.3%
13.3%
6.4%
4.8%
SES wide
4851
89.4%
10.6%
Page 96
Agency
Q49a Have you received a copy of...Your agency's Executive

Performance Management System Plan?
No, and I am
Total # of
No, but I am
not familiar
Respondents
Yes
familiar with it
with it

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
233
234
54.5%
57.5%
44.0%
9.1%
22.7%
23.1%
36.4%
19.7%
32.9%
256
58
279
247
331
59.4%
50.0%
47.7%
57.5%
52.3%
24.2%
25.9%
23.3%
24.3%
17.5%
16.4%
24.1%
29.0%
18.2%
30.2%
59
406
108
97
119
147
164
182
326
155
210
181
42.4%
43.3%
49.1%
55.7%
65.5%
57.1%
52.4%
79.1%
47.2%
38.1%
73.8%
60.8%
18.6%
21.4%
23.1%
16.5%
17.6%
21.8%
19.5%
14.3%
23.6%
21.9%
15.2%
17.1%
39.0%
35.2%
27.8%
27.8%
16.8%
21.1%
28.0%
6.6%
29.1%
40.0%
11.0%
22.1%
21
18
11
30
69
12
47.6%
33.3%
72.7%
50.0%
50.7%
91.7%
23.8%
27.8%
18.2%
13.3%
24.6%
0.0%
28.6%
38.9%
9.1%
36.7%
24.6%
8.3%
290
51.7%
28.6%
19.7%
12
41.7%
16.7%
41.7%
16
37
53
12
118
23
47
30
125
21
37.5%
64.9%
30.2%
75.0%
44.1%
52.2%
70.2%
46.7%
72.8%
47.6%
31.3%
21.6%
30.2%
25.0%
24.6%
26.1%
12.8%
20.0%
12.8%
38.1%
31.3%
13.5%
39.6%
0.0%
31.4%
21.7%
17.0%
33.3%
14.4%
14.3%
SES wide
4830
54.1%
21.2%
24.7%
Page 97
Q49b Have you received a copy of...Your agency's Executive

Compensation Pay Policy?
Yes
No, but I am
familiar with it
No, and I am
not familiar
with it
11
235
234
27.3%
35.7%
30.3%
36.4%
26.0%
20.9%
36.4%
38.3%
48.7%
257
58
278
247
332
44.7%
36.2%
29.9%
32.8%
18.1%
24.9%
22.4%
28.1%
27.5%
23.2%
30.4%
41.4%
42.1%
39.7%
58.7%
60
405
109
98
119
146
166
182
326
155
210
181
23.3%
20.2%
28.4%
41.8%
49.6%
50.0%
33.1%
67.6%
19.9%
29.0%
41.9%
48.1%
25.0%
27.7%
24.8%
28.6%
26.1%
22.6%
22.3%
16.5%
29.1%
27.7%
29.0%
17.1%
51.7%
52.1%
46.8%
29.6%
24.4%
27.4%
44.6%
15.9%
50.9%
43.2%
29.0%
34.8%
21
18
11
30
70
12
23.8%
33.3%
63.6%
40.0%
20.0%
41.7%
33.3%
22.2%
9.1%
6.7%
32.9%
8.3%
42.9%
44.4%
27.3%
53.3%
47.1%
50.0%
291
32.6%
30.2%
37.1%
12
33.3%
25.0%
41.7%
16
36
53
12
119
23
47
29
124
21
25.0%
33.3%
20.8%
75.0%
41.2%
39.1%
55.3%
13.8%
68.5%
28.6%
25.0%
30.6%
26.4%
8.3%
32.8%
21.7%
10.6%
24.1%
16.1%
33.3%
50.0%
36.1%
52.8%
16.7%
26.1%
39.1%
34.0%
62.1%
15.3%
38.1%
4835
34.7%
25.1%
40.1%
Total # of
Respondents

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Agency
Page 98
Q50 Did you receive a briefing or training on your

agency's performance management system?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
232
236
18.2%
72.0%
58.9%
81.8%
28.0%
41.1%
257
57
278
248
332
81.7%
84.2%
75.5%
66.1%
64.8%
18.3%
15.8%
24.5%
33.9%
35.2%
59
407
108
98
118
147
165
181
325
155
211
182
57.6%
45.2%
71.3%
73.5%
78.8%
81.6%
66.1%
85.6%
52.3%
58.1%
83.9%
56.0%
42.4%
54.8%
28.7%
26.5%
21.2%
18.4%
33.9%
14.4%
47.7%
41.9%
16.1%
44.0%
21
18
11
30
71
12
52.4%
38.9%
63.6%
50.0%
57.7%
75.0%
47.6%
61.1%
36.4%
50.0%
42.3%
25.0%
290
71.4%
28.6%
12
41.7%
58.3%
16
37
51
12
120
23
47
30
125
21
62.5%
78.4%
70.6%
83.3%
70.8%
52.2%
59.6%
53.3%
79.2%
57.1%
37.5%
21.6%
29.4%
16.7%
29.2%
47.8%
40.4%
46.7%
20.8%
42.9%
SES wide
4834
66.9%
33.1%
Agency
Page 99
Q51 Were you given a summary of your agency's

SES overall performance ratings, performance
awards and pay adjustments?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
232
235
63.6%
34.9%
48.9%
36.4%
65.1%
51.1%
256
57
280
246
329
65.2%
63.2%
66.8%
37.0%
21.9%
34.8%
36.8%
33.2%
63.0%
78.1%
60
406
109
98
119
146
166
181
328
153
211
184
68.3%
22.7%
36.7%
52.0%
79.8%
68.5%
38.6%
66.9%
31.7%
24.2%
58.8%
78.8%
31.7%
77.3%
63.3%
48.0%
20.2%
31.5%
61.4%
33.1%
68.3%
75.8%
41.2%
21.2%
21
18
11
29
71
12
52.4%
44.4%
18.2%
34.5%
26.8%
41.7%
47.6%
55.6%
81.8%
65.5%
73.2%
58.3%
290
38.6%
61.4%
12
33.3%
66.7%
16
37
51
12
120
23
47
30
125
21
43.8%
54.1%
58.8%
75.0%
83.3%
43.5%
61.7%
16.7%
69.6%
57.1%
56.3%
45.9%
41.2%
25.0%
16.7%
56.5%
38.3%
83.3%
30.4%
42.9%
SES wide
4833
47.2%
52.8%
Agency
Page 100
Q52 My agency deals effectively with executives who perform poorly.
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
0.0%
1.0%
4.9%
0.0%
21.8%
22.3%
36.4%
32.7%
31.1%
27.3%
32.7%
29.6%
36.4%
11.9%
12.1%
213
50
244
3.3%
2.0%
2.5%
29.1%
24.0%
22.1%
31.5%
36.0%
30.7%
24.4%
26.0%
25.4%
11.7%
12.0%
19.3%
207
287
4.3%
4.5%
26.1%
19.9%
31.4%
35.9%
22.7%
28.2%
15.5%
11.5%
52
364
95
79
96
122
151
148
284
142
189
164
3.8%
4.1%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2.0%
4.2%
9.9%
2.1%
1.2%
9.6%
24.7%
27.4%
8.9%
34.4%
22.1%
23.2%
30.4%
25.7%
28.2%
28.6%
7.3%
32.7%
30.8%
31.6%
40.5%
35.4%
40.2%
29.1%
29.1%
31.3%
31.0%
29.1%
36.6%
26.9%
27.7%
27.4%
32.9%
20.8%
22.1%
29.1%
30.4%
25.0%
20.4%
30.7%
36.0%
26.9%
12.6%
13.7%
16.5%
9.4%
15.6%
17.9%
8.1%
13.7%
10.6%
9.5%
18.9%
20
14
9
20
62
12
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
5.0%
6.5%
0.0%
15.0%
14.3%
33.3%
25.0%
32.3%
50.0%
40.0%
21.4%
22.2%
20.0%
29.0%
33.3%
35.0%
64.3%
11.1%
45.0%
27.4%
16.7%
10.0%
0.0%
22.2%
5.0%
4.8%
0.0%
249
2.8%
25.7%
31.3%
25.7%
14.5%
10
0.0%
60.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15
31
45
11
106
20
43
27
109
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
9.1%
3.8%
0.0%
4.7%
0.0%
4.6%
13.3%
9.7%
13.3%
36.4%
34.9%
40.0%
37.2%
22.2%
36.7%
46.7%
35.5%
22.2%
18.2%
28.3%
25.0%
23.3%
33.3%
30.3%
26.7%
48.4%
37.8%
36.4%
24.5%
30.0%
18.6%
29.6%
18.3%
13.3%
6.5%
24.4%
0.0%
8.5%
5.0%
16.3%
14.8%
10.1%
21
0.0%
14.3%
9.5%
52.4%
23.8%
4204
3.2%
24.5%
31.7%
27.3%
13.2%
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
202
206
SES wide
Agency
Page 101
Q53 Were you evaluated as a member of the SES on

your most recent performance rating?
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
230
235
90.9%
92.2%
91.1%
9.1%
7.8%
8.9%
254
57
279
245
329
93.7%
87.7%
91.4%
91.4%
88.8%
6.3%
12.3%
8.6%
8.6%
11.2%
60
406
107
98
118
146
166
182
329
154
210
184
90.0%
86.9%
80.4%
85.7%
87.3%
89.7%
90.4%
97.3%
90.6%
86.4%
88.6%
95.1%
10.0%
13.1%
19.6%
14.3%
12.7%
10.3%
9.6%
2.7%
9.4%
13.6%
11.4%
4.9%
21
18
11
30
69
12
90.5%
77.8%
81.8%
93.3%
85.5%
83.3%
9.5%
22.2%
18.2%
6.7%
14.5%
16.7%
287
96.9%
3.1%
12
91.7%
8.3%
16
37
52
12
118
22
47
30
125
21
87.5%
89.2%
86.5%
83.3%
97.5%
95.5%
89.4%
86.7%
92.8%
81.0%
12.5%
10.8%
13.5%
16.7%
2.5%
4.5%
10.6%
13.3%
7.2%
19.0%
SES wide
4822
90.5%
9.5%
Agency
Page 102
Agency
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
Q54 When did you last receive a formal performance evaluation?

Over one
N/A or I have held this
year ago
position for less than a
year and am not yet due
Within
More than
but less
Total # of
for a formal
the past
two years
than two
Respondents
year
years
ago
performance evaluation
11
90.9%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
232
96.1%
1.3%
1.7%
0.9%
236
90.3%
1.3%
0.4%
8.1%
257
57
280
91.1%
86.0%
93.9%
3.1%
5.3%
2.1%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
4.7%
8.8%
3.9%
247
332
93.5%
88.6%
2.4%
4.8%
0.4%
0.6%
3.6%
6.0%
61
409
108
98
119
147
166
182
327
155
211
184
85.2%
91.2%
87.0%
89.8%
89.9%
91.2%
92.8%
95.6%
95.4%
87.7%
91.9%
97.8%
8.2%
2.2%
2.8%
2.0%
4.2%
2.7%
2.4%
2.2%
1.5%
3.9%
4.3%
0.0%
1.6%
1.0%
3.7%
2.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.6%
0.5%
1.1%
4.9%
5.6%
6.5%
6.1%
5.9%
5.4%
4.8%
2.2%
2.8%
7.7%
3.3%
1.1%
21
18
11
29
70
12
90.5%
72.2%
81.8%
100.0%
90.0%
91.7%
0.0%
5.6%
9.1%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
8.3%
9.5%
16.7%
9.1%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
289
94.8%
2.4%
0.7%
2.1%
12
91.7%
0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
16
37
52
12
120
23
46
30
125
81.3%
94.6%
82.7%
91.7%
98.3%
60.9%
87.0%
93.3%
94.4%
6.3%
2.7%
9.6%
0.0%
0.0%
30.4%
8.7%
3.3%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.7%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
12.5%
2.7%
7.7%
8.3%
1.7%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
3.2%
21
4845
71.4%
91.8%
14.3%
2.9%
0.0%
0.8%
14.3%
4.4%
Page 103
Q55 Was your rating changed?

Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No

Field Activities
Department of Labor
Department of State
11
228
225
9.1%
7.9%
8.9%
90.9%
92.1%
91.1%
253
56
273
238
325
60
401
103
97
117
145
164
181
323
151
211
178
21
18
10
30
67
12
284
12
16
37
49
11
119
22
45
30
124
19
13.8%
10.7%
7.7%
5.5%
12.0%
40.0%
3.2%
3.9%
11.3%
50.4%
31.0%
5.5%
14.4%
7.4%
2.6%
9.5%
6.2%
23.8%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
11.9%
0.0%
7.0%
0.0%
6.3%
10.8%
4.1%
9.1%
4.2%
9.1%
24.4%
6.7%
3.2%
21.1%
86.2%
89.3%
92.3%
94.5%
88.0%
60.0%
96.8%
96.1%
88.7%
49.6%
69.0%
94.5%
85.6%
92.6%
97.4%
90.5%
93.8%
76.2%
100.0%
100.0%
93.3%
88.1%
100.0%
93.0%
100.0%
93.8%
89.2%
95.9%
90.9%
95.8%
90.9%
75.6%
93.3%
96.8%
78.9%
SES wide
4747
10.1%
89.9%
Agency
Page 104
(Note: This question was only seen by those who

answered yes on question #55. All others skipped this
question.)
Agency
Q56 At what point in the process was your

rating changed?
As a result of
Total # of
As a result of
a higher level
Respondents the PRB review
review
OSD, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, and DoD Field
Activities
Department of Labor
Department of State
14
12
21.4%
66.7%
78.6%
33.3%
26
3
11
8
30
18
10
2
9
57
34
8
17
16
3
14
4
4
2
6
12
1
2
1
9
1
3
34.6%
66.7%
63.6%
62.5%
33.3%
27.8%
50.0%
0.0%
55.6%
73.7%
79.4%
37.5%
82.4%
43.8%
33.3%
57.1%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
33.3%
33.3%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
55.6%
0.0%
33.3%
65.4%
33.3%
36.4%
37.5%
66.7%
72.2%
50.0%
100.0%
44.4%
26.3%
20.6%
62.5%
17.6%
56.3%
66.7%
42.9%
100.0%
50.0%
100.0%
66.7%
66.7%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
44.4%
100.0%
66.7%
SES wide
340
52.1%
47.9%
Page 105
Agency
Q57 My rating was based on an objective record of my performance.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
231
236
27.3%
22.5%
21.6%
45.5%
41.1%
41.1%
27.3%
18.6%
21.6%
0.0%
13.4%
11.0%
0.0%
4.3%
4.7%
256
56
278
18.0%
30.4%
19.8%
43.4%
37.5%
43.5%
18.0%
17.9%
16.5%
16.8%
8.9%
13.7%
3.9%
5.4%
6.5%
241
329
36.9%
22.5%
35.7%
41.0%
11.6%
19.1%
9.1%
12.5%
6.6%
4.9%
61
407
106
96
118
147
166
182
326
152
211
183
16.4%
31.9%
17.0%
39.6%
15.3%
16.3%
28.3%
22.5%
24.5%
34.9%
22.3%
16.9%
23.0%
43.7%
39.6%
35.4%
41.5%
44.2%
39.2%
52.2%
43.6%
40.1%
38.9%
35.0%
19.7%
13.8%
22.6%
10.4%
18.6%
21.1%
15.7%
14.8%
13.8%
14.5%
16.1%
20.2%
19.7%
7.1%
11.3%
6.3%
17.8%
15.0%
10.8%
6.0%
13.5%
5.9%
15.2%
19.1%
21.3%
3.4%
9.4%
8.3%
6.8%
3.4%
6.0%
4.4%
4.6%
4.6%
7.6%
8.7%
21
18
11
29
69
12
19.0%
44.4%
45.5%
34.5%
23.2%
66.7%
42.9%
33.3%
27.3%
48.3%
44.9%
25.0%
19.0%
22.2%
27.3%
10.3%
21.7%
8.3%
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
7.2%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
2.9%
0.0%
287
27.9%
36.2%
16.4%
15.0%
4.5%
12
58.3%
33.3%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
16
37
50
12
120
23
46
30
124
31.3%
29.7%
22.0%
58.3%
25.8%
13.0%
21.7%
46.7%
43.5%
50.0%
54.1%
42.0%
8.3%
45.0%
60.9%
32.6%
23.3%
38.7%
18.8%
13.5%
18.0%
8.3%
20.0%
21.7%
19.6%
6.7%
11.3%
0.0%
0.0%
18.0%
8.3%
6.7%
4.3%
8.7%
16.7%
5.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
16.7%
2.5%
0.0%
17.4%
6.7%
0.8%
20
25.0%
35.0%
25.0%
5.0%
10.0%
SES wide
4812
25.8%
40.9%
16.6%
11.5%
5.2%
Page 106
Agency
Q58 Pay distinctions are meaningfully different among executives.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
9
189
188
0.0%
3.2%
6.9%
0.0%
23.3%
22.9%
44.4%
24.9%
23.4%
33.3%
28.0%
31.9%
22.2%
20.6%
14.9%
213
42
244
5.2%
2.4%
2.5%
26.3%
42.9%
24.2%
21.1%
16.7%
19.7%
28.2%
26.2%
31.1%
19.2%
11.9%
22.5%
189
249
6.3%
10.4%
26.5%
19.7%
24.3%
24.9%
27.5%
27.7%
15.3%
17.3%
54
323
83
82
107
133
141
162
266
117
191
156
7.4%
8.0%
3.6%
2.4%
6.5%
5.3%
6.4%
5.6%
5.3%
3.4%
6.3%
3.8%
9.3%
26.9%
9.6%
19.5%
38.3%
20.3%
19.1%
18.5%
19.9%
25.6%
18.8%
26.9%
24.1%
27.6%
34.9%
25.6%
23.4%
28.6%
30.5%
27.2%
20.7%
23.9%
19.4%
26.9%
31.5%
25.1%
32.5%
34.1%
21.5%
27.1%
27.7%
30.2%
25.2%
25.6%
29.8%
31.4%
27.8%
12.4%
19.3%
18.3%
10.3%
18.8%
16.3%
18.5%
28.9%
21.4%
25.7%
10.9%
19
12
9
20
48
11
5.3%
8.3%
0.0%
5.0%
8.3%
0.0%
21.1%
16.7%
33.3%
20.0%
16.7%
18.2%
26.3%
25.0%
22.2%
20.0%
35.4%
54.5%
31.6%
41.7%
22.2%
40.0%
18.8%
27.3%
15.8%
8.3%
22.2%
15.0%
20.8%
0.0%
237
4.6%
24.5%
25.7%
29.1%
16.0%
0.0%
22.2%
55.6%
22.2%
0.0%
14
33
40
10
115
22
35
26
95
14.3%
0.0%
2.5%
20.0%
8.7%
0.0%
2.9%
11.5%
9.5%
35.7%
21.2%
10.0%
10.0%
36.5%
18.2%
22.9%
26.9%
29.5%
14.3%
27.3%
17.5%
30.0%
20.9%
27.3%
28.6%
34.6%
24.2%
21.4%
36.4%
30.0%
40.0%
26.1%
50.0%
22.9%
15.4%
27.4%
14.3%
15.2%
40.0%
0.0%
7.8%
4.5%
22.9%
11.5%
9.5%
17
5.9%
29.4%
11.8%
41.2%
11.8%
SES wide
3980
5.7%
23.5%
24.7%
28.3%
17.7%
Page 107
Agency
Q59 Performance awards are meaningfully different among executives.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
9
185
188
0.0%
4.3%
9.0%
11.1%
30.8%
34.6%
55.6%
27.0%
26.6%
22.2%
25.9%
20.7%
11.1%
11.9%
9.0%
204
42
239
5.4%
7.1%
6.3%
38.2%
50.0%
32.2%
19.6%
16.7%
24.3%
24.5%
16.7%
20.5%
12.3%
9.5%
16.7%
180
237
8.9%
12.7%
35.0%
25.7%
26.7%
25.7%
17.8%
22.4%
11.7%
13.5%
52
313
82
82
105
131
142
160
260
115
186
154
7.7%
13.4%
6.1%
7.3%
8.6%
6.1%
9.9%
8.8%
8.8%
6.1%
8.1%
9.1%
21.2%
32.3%
25.6%
31.7%
43.8%
32.8%
27.5%
36.3%
35.0%
36.5%
28.5%
37.7%
15.4%
24.6%
26.8%
20.7%
23.8%
24.4%
34.5%
29.4%
21.2%
27.0%
23.7%
24.7%
26.9%
18.2%
24.4%
25.6%
17.1%
22.1%
14.8%
15.0%
17.3%
20.0%
23.1%
18.8%
28.8%
11.5%
17.1%
14.6%
6.7%
14.5%
13.4%
10.6%
17.7%
10.4%
16.7%
9.7%
18
10
9
18
48
11
11.1%
10.0%
0.0%
5.6%
8.3%
9.1%
38.9%
50.0%
44.4%
50.0%
27.1%
18.2%
11.1%
30.0%
11.1%
27.8%
31.3%
36.4%
27.8%
10.0%
33.3%
16.7%
12.5%
36.4%
11.1%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
20.8%
0.0%
242
7.4%
34.7%
24.8%
21.9%
11.2%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14
33
36
9
113
21
37
26
95
14.3%
0.0%
8.3%
22.2%
16.8%
4.8%
5.4%
19.2%
11.6%
42.9%
33.3%
22.2%
44.4%
42.5%
52.4%
32.4%
38.5%
40.0%
7.1%
24.2%
27.8%
11.1%
21.2%
23.8%
32.4%
19.2%
21.1%
35.7%
33.3%
22.2%
11.1%
13.3%
14.3%
13.5%
11.5%
20.0%
0.0%
9.1%
19.4%
11.1%
6.2%
4.8%
16.2%
11.5%
7.4%
15
6.7%
46.7%
13.3%
20.0%
13.3%
SES wide
3898
8.7%
33.9%
24.9%
20.0%
12.6%
Page 108
Agency
Q60 Pay for the SES should be based on performance.

Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
233
234
54.5%
48.5%
50.4%
45.5%
41.6%
44.9%
0.0%
7.7%
4.3%
0.0%
2.1%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
257
56
279
42.8%
50.0%
57.0%
49.8%
41.1%
38.7%
5.8%
7.1%
2.9%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.4%
1.8%
0.4%
247
331
47.4%
47.1%
43.7%
44.4%
8.1%
5.7%
0.8%
1.2%
0.0%
1.5%
60
408
109
97
119
147
165
181
325
155
211
184
53.3%
45.8%
45.0%
38.1%
55.5%
54.4%
51.5%
59.7%
51.1%
48.4%
40.3%
34.8%
38.3%
43.9%
41.3%
46.4%
42.0%
40.8%
41.2%
35.4%
42.2%
43.2%
46.9%
55.4%
8.3%
8.3%
9.2%
10.3%
1.7%
3.4%
7.3%
4.4%
4.9%
7.7%
11.8%
8.7%
0.0%
1.5%
2.8%
5.2%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.9%
0.0%
0.5%
1.1%
0.0%
0.5%
1.8%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.6%
0.5%
0.0%
21
18
11
30
71
12
61.9%
50.0%
45.5%
36.7%
49.3%
41.7%
28.6%
44.4%
54.5%
60.0%
43.7%
50.0%
4.8%
5.6%
0.0%
3.3%
7.0%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
288
57.3%
35.1%
6.6%
1.0%
0.0%
12
66.7%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
16
37
52
12
120
23
47
30
125
31.3%
45.9%
38.5%
66.7%
45.0%
39.1%
51.1%
63.3%
48.8%
37.5%
40.5%
51.9%
25.0%
46.7%
43.5%
38.3%
26.7%
48.8%
25.0%
8.1%
9.6%
8.3%
7.5%
8.7%
8.5%
6.7%
1.6%
6.3%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
8.7%
0.0%
3.3%
0.8%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
21
42.9%
52.4%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
SES wide
4837
48.7%
43.3%
6.5%
1.1%
0.4%
Page 109
Agency
Q61 In my agency, SES pay for performance promotes better individual

performance.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
205
208
0.0%
9.3%
12.5%
45.5%
36.6%
39.4%
45.5%
26.3%
27.4%
0.0%
18.5%
13.9%
9.1%
9.3%
6.7%
234
44
255
5.6%
9.1%
5.9%
35.9%
38.6%
43.1%
27.8%
29.5%
23.9%
19.7%
15.9%
17.6%
11.1%
6.8%
9.4%
206
282
11.7%
10.3%
43.2%
30.5%
26.2%
34.4%
12.6%
16.3%
6.3%
8.5%
57
341
95
84
112
134
152
171
291
132
193
167
7.0%
12.3%
8.4%
7.1%
12.5%
2.2%
10.5%
12.9%
12.4%
16.7%
9.3%
5.4%
19.3%
35.8%
27.4%
38.1%
42.9%
37.3%
31.6%
42.7%
33.3%
35.6%
30.1%
30.5%
36.8%
27.3%
33.7%
23.8%
28.6%
31.3%
34.9%
22.2%
26.1%
26.5%
29.0%
26.9%
24.6%
14.4%
16.8%
21.4%
12.5%
20.9%
14.5%
14.6%
18.6%
14.4%
21.2%
29.3%
12.3%
10.3%
13.7%
9.5%
3.6%
8.2%
8.6%
7.6%
9.6%
6.8%
10.4%
7.8%
18
14
8
23
63
12
5.6%
14.3%
12.5%
8.7%
12.7%
16.7%
38.9%
35.7%
37.5%
39.1%
46.0%
33.3%
27.8%
50.0%
37.5%
21.7%
19.0%
25.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
26.1%
12.7%
16.7%
22.2%
0.0%
12.5%
4.3%
9.5%
8.3%
258
10.1%
35.7%
27.1%
19.8%
7.4%
11
18.2%
36.4%
18.2%
18.2%
9.1%
14
33
44
10
109
22
42
24
114
7.1%
3.0%
6.8%
20.0%
10.1%
0.0%
2.4%
20.8%
13.2%
21.4%
51.5%
31.8%
40.0%
40.4%
22.7%
26.2%
12.5%
41.2%
57.1%
12.1%
38.6%
40.0%
29.4%
36.4%
47.6%
37.5%
31.6%
7.1%
21.2%
18.2%
0.0%
18.3%
36.4%
11.9%
16.7%
11.4%
7.1%
12.1%
4.5%
0.0%
1.8%
4.5%
11.9%
12.5%
2.6%
15
13.3%
33.3%
26.7%
13.3%
13.3%
SES wide
4281
9.8%
36.1%
28.5%
17.2%
8.4%
Page 110
Agency
Q62 In my agency, SES pay for performance promotes better organizational

performance.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
209
207
0.0%
10.5%
10.6%
54.5%
31.6%
33.3%
27.3%
28.7%
29.5%
9.1%
22.0%
16.4%
9.1%
7.2%
10.1%
235
44
255
6.8%
6.8%
5.9%
27.7%
34.1%
37.6%
28.9%
27.3%
26.3%
23.8%
27.3%
20.4%
12.8%
4.5%
9.8%
206
283
12.6%
11.3%
37.4%
29.7%
26.7%
32.2%
14.6%
17.0%
8.7%
9.9%
57
340
97
85
113
135
151
169
293
134
197
166
10.5%
13.5%
6.2%
5.9%
9.7%
2.2%
9.9%
9.5%
11.9%
12.7%
12.7%
3.0%
12.3%
33.2%
27.8%
25.9%
37.2%
30.4%
29.8%
34.3%
33.1%
38.8%
37.6%
23.5%
36.8%
27.6%
30.9%
29.4%
31.0%
35.6%
31.8%
27.8%
25.6%
26.1%
19.8%
33.1%
28.1%
15.6%
22.7%
25.9%
16.8%
21.5%
18.5%
20.7%
20.8%
14.9%
21.8%
30.1%
12.3%
10.0%
12.4%
12.9%
5.3%
10.4%
9.9%
7.7%
8.5%
7.5%
8.1%
10.2%
18
15
7
22
63
12
11.1%
13.3%
14.3%
9.1%
11.1%
25.0%
38.9%
40.0%
14.3%
40.9%
34.9%
41.7%
22.2%
40.0%
57.1%
22.7%
20.6%
33.3%
11.1%
6.7%
14.3%
18.2%
23.8%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
9.5%
0.0%
262
10.3%
31.7%
28.2%
22.1%
7.6%
11
0.0%
45.5%
36.4%
9.1%
9.1%
14
33
43
10
109
21
43
24
116
14.3%
6.1%
4.7%
10.0%
12.8%
0.0%
2.3%
16.7%
10.3%
28.6%
48.5%
25.6%
60.0%
38.5%
28.6%
30.2%
16.7%
40.5%
21.4%
12.1%
46.5%
30.0%
27.5%
42.9%
37.2%
33.3%
32.8%
21.4%
27.3%
20.9%
0.0%
19.3%
23.8%
18.6%
20.8%
11.2%
14.3%
6.1%
2.3%
0.0%
1.8%
4.8%
11.6%
12.5%
5.2%
15
13.3%
33.3%
20.0%
20.0%
13.3%
SES wide
4299
9.7%
32.8%
28.9%
19.7%
8.9%
Page 111
Agency
Q63 How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a good job?
Neither
Total # of
Very
Very
Satisfied nor
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
232
232
9.1%
12.1%
17.7%
36.4%
34.5%
36.2%
45.5%
25.4%
16.4%
9.1%
23.3%
23.3%
0.0%
4.7%
6.5%
257
56
278
14.0%
25.0%
12.2%
33.9%
33.9%
38.1%
23.3%
23.2%
21.2%
21.0%
12.5%
16.9%
7.8%
5.4%
11.5%
245
330
20.8%
16.7%
41.2%
40.6%
14.3%
20.0%
16.7%
15.5%
6.9%
7.3%
60
407
109
98
118
147
166
180
328
154
211
183
10.0%
20.9%
16.5%
22.4%
17.8%
12.9%
16.3%
15.6%
18.6%
20.8%
12.8%
14.8%
25.0%
40.0%
32.1%
27.6%
42.4%
38.8%
40.4%
40.6%
36.6%
46.1%
34.6%
37.2%
13.3%
18.4%
24.8%
21.4%
20.3%
24.5%
15.7%
20.6%
21.6%
16.9%
21.3%
16.9%
30.0%
14.0%
16.5%
18.4%
13.6%
19.0%
15.1%
15.6%
14.9%
11.7%
19.4%
24.6%
21.7%
6.6%
10.1%
10.2%
5.9%
4.8%
12.7%
7.8%
8.2%
4.5%
11.8%
6.6%
21
18
11
30
70
12
9.5%
33.3%
9.1%
36.7%
15.7%
58.3%
42.9%
50.0%
36.4%
40.0%
41.4%
25.0%
28.6%
5.6%
27.3%
3.3%
27.1%
0.0%
4.8%
11.1%
18.2%
13.3%
11.4%
8.3%
14.3%
0.0%
9.1%
6.7%
4.3%
8.3%
287
16.7%
41.1%
17.4%
19.2%
5.6%
12
25.0%
41.7%
25.0%
8.3%
0.0%
15
36
51
12
119
22
46
30
125
20.0%
8.3%
17.6%
41.7%
26.9%
9.1%
19.6%
30.0%
26.4%
53.3%
63.9%
35.3%
25.0%
42.0%
50.0%
32.6%
20.0%
43.2%
13.3%
13.9%
27.5%
8.3%
18.5%
13.6%
17.4%
16.7%
16.0%
6.7%
13.9%
17.6%
16.7%
10.1%
18.2%
21.7%
26.7%
12.8%
6.7%
0.0%
2.0%
8.3%
2.5%
9.1%
8.7%
6.7%
1.6%
21
9.5%
38.1%
23.8%
19.0%
9.5%
SES wide
4821
17.7%
38.4%
19.6%
17.0%
7.3%
Page 112
Q64 How satisfied are you with your pay?
Satisfied
Neither
Satisfied nor
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
0.0%
7.7%
10.7%
36.4%
38.6%
27.8%
18.2%
20.6%
20.1%
36.4%
25.8%
29.1%
9.1%
7.3%
12.4%
257
56
278
7.0%
12.5%
8.3%
36.6%
50.0%
33.1%
20.6%
14.3%
19.4%
25.7%
16.1%
28.1%
10.1%
7.1%
11.2%
245
332
8.6%
15.7%
49.4%
43.1%
15.9%
15.1%
19.2%
19.6%
6.9%
6.6%
61
406
109
97
119
147
166
180
328
154
209
184
14.8%
15.3%
10.1%
16.5%
11.8%
6.1%
10.8%
7.2%
9.1%
13.0%
5.7%
16.3%
41.0%
39.9%
44.0%
38.1%
41.2%
37.4%
39.8%
30.6%
42.1%
41.6%
30.1%
45.7%
16.4%
18.7%
14.7%
13.4%
16.8%
15.6%
17.5%
21.1%
14.9%
20.8%
14.4%
12.0%
13.1%
20.2%
22.0%
26.8%
22.7%
25.9%
25.9%
28.3%
23.5%
18.2%
30.1%
20.7%
14.8%
5.9%
9.2%
5.2%
7.6%
15.0%
6.0%
12.8%
10.4%
6.5%
19.6%
5.4%
21
18
11
30
70
12
9.5%
22.2%
0.0%
10.0%
7.1%
25.0%
38.1%
38.9%
54.5%
30.0%
44.3%
33.3%
23.8%
16.7%
9.1%
26.7%
14.3%
16.7%
23.8%
22.2%
36.4%
30.0%
24.3%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
10.0%
16.7%
288
11.5%
38.9%
21.2%
20.8%
7.6%
12
16.7%
50.0%
0.0%
8.3%
25.0%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
18.8%
8.1%
17.3%
0.0%
9.2%
17.4%
17.4%
23.3%
23.2%
43.8%
56.8%
36.5%
41.7%
45.4%
30.4%
52.2%
43.3%
48.0%
18.8%
10.8%
21.2%
16.7%
19.3%
21.7%
8.7%
10.0%
12.8%
12.5%
21.6%
23.1%
33.3%
17.6%
30.4%
10.9%
16.7%
12.8%
6.3%
2.7%
1.9%
8.3%
8.4%
0.0%
10.9%
6.7%
3.2%
21
28.6%
38.1%
9.5%
14.3%
9.5%
4831
11.3%
39.8%
17.4%
22.7%
8.7%
Total # of
Respondents
Very
Satisfied

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
233
234
SES wide
Agency
Page 113
Agency
Q65 Job changes (i.e.; formal changes in position and not just shifting
responsibilities) improve senior executives performance.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
233
234
27.3%
15.0%
12.8%
36.4%
37.3%
33.3%
27.3%
33.5%
36.8%
9.1%
12.4%
13.7%
0.0%
1.7%
3.4%
256
56
277
14.1%
14.3%
14.4%
38.3%
32.1%
46.2%
35.5%
32.1%
28.9%
9.4%
19.6%
9.0%
2.7%
1.8%
1.4%
246
329
12.6%
23.4%
35.8%
38.9%
36.6%
28.3%
12.6%
7.3%
2.4%
2.1%
59
405
108
98
118
147
166
180
328
154
208
184
32.2%
20.2%
6.5%
18.4%
22.9%
14.3%
15.7%
18.9%
18.3%
15.6%
13.5%
21.2%
20.3%
35.8%
33.3%
34.7%
52.5%
49.7%
33.1%
38.3%
44.5%
35.1%
32.2%
40.8%
32.2%
31.4%
36.1%
35.7%
17.8%
21.1%
33.7%
30.0%
30.2%
34.4%
32.2%
27.2%
11.9%
10.9%
19.4%
9.2%
5.1%
11.6%
15.1%
11.7%
6.1%
13.0%
14.4%
8.7%
3.4%
1.7%
4.6%
2.0%
1.7%
3.4%
2.4%
1.1%
0.9%
1.9%
7.7%
2.2%
21
18
11
30
70
12
9.5%
16.7%
18.2%
10.0%
18.6%
8.3%
23.8%
33.3%
18.2%
13.3%
45.7%
33.3%
52.4%
33.3%
54.5%
60.0%
21.4%
41.7%
14.3%
16.7%
9.1%
16.7%
14.3%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
287
18.5%
42.2%
27.5%
9.4%
2.4%
12
8.3%
25.0%
41.7%
16.7%
8.3%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
0.0%
8.1%
7.7%
8.3%
31.9%
8.7%
17.4%
26.7%
24.8%
25.0%
21.6%
46.2%
41.7%
47.9%
43.5%
34.8%
26.7%
38.4%
56.3%
29.7%
38.5%
33.3%
16.8%
39.1%
37.0%
36.7%
25.6%
12.5%
32.4%
7.7%
8.3%
1.7%
4.3%
10.9%
6.7%
10.4%
6.3%
8.1%
0.0%
8.3%
1.7%
4.3%
0.0%
3.3%
0.8%
21
28.6%
52.4%
14.3%
4.8%
0.0%
SES wide
4821
17.2%
38.6%
31.2%
10.7%
2.3%
Page 114
Agency
Q66 Senior executives should be able to perform successfully in a wide range of

career positions.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
233
234
36.4%
27.0%
25.6%
45.5%
50.6%
44.9%
9.1%
11.2%
16.7%
9.1%
10.7%
10.3%
0.0%
0.4%
2.6%
257
56
278
31.5%
33.9%
29.9%
48.2%
42.9%
51.4%
15.6%
12.5%
10.8%
3.9%
10.7%
7.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
246
331
33.7%
43.2%
41.9%
44.7%
14.6%
6.3%
8.5%
5.4%
1.2%
0.3%
60
406
108
98
119
146
166
180
328
154
210
184
43.3%
31.5%
16.7%
32.7%
42.0%
26.0%
32.5%
25.0%
32.0%
27.9%
27.1%
34.2%
33.3%
44.6%
52.8%
50.0%
44.5%
48.6%
44.6%
49.4%
53.4%
53.2%
41.0%
48.4%
16.7%
12.6%
13.0%
10.2%
9.2%
13.7%
10.8%
18.3%
6.4%
10.4%
16.7%
12.5%
3.3%
11.1%
13.0%
5.1%
3.4%
10.3%
10.8%
7.2%
7.6%
7.8%
11.9%
4.9%
3.3%
0.2%
4.6%
2.0%
0.8%
1.4%
1.2%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
3.3%
0.0%
21
18
11
30
70
12
28.6%
16.7%
0.0%
16.7%
31.4%
8.3%
38.1%
61.1%
36.4%
50.0%
51.4%
58.3%
28.6%
16.7%
18.2%
16.7%
12.9%
25.0%
4.8%
5.6%
45.5%
13.3%
4.3%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
288
34.7%
46.2%
9.7%
8.7%
0.7%
12
33.3%
50.0%
8.3%
8.3%
0.0%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
18.8%
16.2%
23.1%
41.7%
38.7%
21.7%
30.4%
46.7%
41.6%
56.3%
43.2%
50.0%
50.0%
50.4%
56.5%
41.3%
26.7%
45.6%
0.0%
18.9%
23.1%
0.0%
5.0%
8.7%
17.4%
16.7%
10.4%
18.8%
21.6%
3.8%
8.3%
4.2%
8.7%
10.9%
6.7%
1.6%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
4.3%
0.0%
3.3%
0.8%
21
42.9%
38.1%
9.5%
9.5%
0.0%
SES wide
4830
31.4%
47.3%
12.2%
8.2%
1.0%
Page 115
Agency
Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
SES wide
Q68 The five executive core qualifications (Leading People, Leading Change,
Results Driven, Building Coalitions, Business Acumen) represent the critical
skills needed by SES to succeed in performing their roles as Federal leaders.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
11
18.2%
54.5%
27.3%
0.0%
0.0%
229
24.5%
54.6%
12.7%
4.8%
3.5%
230
15.2%
50.4%
22.2%
7.8%
4.3%
251
56
274
11.6%
14.3%
12.0%
60.6%
53.6%
55.8%
15.9%
21.4%
19.0%
9.6%
7.1%
9.1%
2.4%
3.6%
4.0%
240
328
18.3%
24.1%
54.6%
57.0%
19.2%
11.9%
6.7%
5.5%
1.3%
1.5%
59
383
106
95
118
146
164
177
325
153
208
184
25.4%
15.4%
7.5%
10.5%
19.5%
16.4%
19.5%
20.9%
15.1%
17.6%
18.3%
14.7%
47.5%
53.0%
56.6%
63.2%
67.8%
67.1%
53.7%
60.5%
62.5%
50.3%
64.9%
60.3%
20.3%
18.0%
18.9%
16.8%
11.9%
8.9%
18.3%
14.1%
12.9%
21.6%
9.1%
12.5%
5.1%
8.9%
11.3%
7.4%
0.0%
7.5%
7.3%
4.0%
7.4%
8.5%
6.3%
10.3%
1.7%
4.7%
5.7%
2.1%
0.8%
0.0%
1.2%
0.6%
2.2%
2.0%
1.4%
2.2%
20
10.0%
50.0%
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
18
11
25
68
12
11.1%
18.2%
8.0%
26.5%
0.0%
61.1%
27.3%
56.0%
58.8%
66.7%
11.1%
18.2%
20.0%
7.4%
16.7%
16.7%
18.2%
4.0%
4.4%
16.7%
0.0%
18.2%
12.0%
2.9%
0.0%
285
18.6%
61.1%
11.6%
8.4%
0.4%
11
27.3%
63.6%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
16
35
51
12
119
23
45
30
123
12.5%
11.4%
13.7%
25.0%
21.8%
8.7%
22.2%
26.7%
19.5%
56.3%
40.0%
56.9%
25.0%
62.2%
60.9%
53.3%
50.0%
60.2%
6.3%
22.9%
19.6%
8.3%
10.9%
21.7%
17.8%
16.7%
12.2%
18.8%
22.9%
9.8%
33.3%
4.2%
8.7%
4.4%
6.7%
6.5%
6.3%
2.9%
0.0%
8.3%
0.8%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
1.6%
21
4743
23.8%
17.2%
52.4%
57.6%
19.0%
15.3%
4.8%
7.5%
0.0%
2.3%
Page 116
Agency
Q69 As a job seeker, I would prefer to use a resume to apply for SES jobs instead
of submitting executive core qualifications (ECQs) statements.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
228
231
27.3%
19.7%
39.4%
36.4%
33.8%
28.6%
27.3%
20.2%
17.7%
9.1%
20.2%
10.8%
0.0%
6.1%
3.5%
253
54
274
29.2%
31.5%
28.8%
40.3%
31.5%
35.4%
15.4%
14.8%
19.3%
11.9%
18.5%
13.5%
3.2%
3.7%
2.9%
243
328
35.8%
27.1%
32.1%
36.3%
17.7%
13.4%
12.8%
15.9%
1.6%
7.3%
59
383
108
97
119
143
164
178
319
153
207
182
35.6%
32.9%
38.0%
28.9%
16.0%
17.5%
20.1%
20.8%
35.7%
34.0%
34.3%
25.8%
28.8%
33.9%
34.3%
39.2%
39.5%
34.3%
37.8%
33.7%
30.4%
30.1%
30.9%
35.7%
13.6%
20.1%
16.7%
17.5%
18.5%
16.1%
23.8%
23.0%
16.9%
17.6%
17.4%
17.6%
18.6%
11.2%
9.3%
10.3%
20.2%
23.1%
12.8%
18.5%
12.9%
13.1%
13.5%
17.6%
3.4%
1.8%
1.9%
4.1%
5.9%
9.1%
5.5%
3.9%
4.1%
5.2%
3.9%
3.3%
20
18
11
28
68
11
20.0%
33.3%
45.5%
42.9%
27.9%
45.5%
45.0%
50.0%
27.3%
39.3%
29.4%
36.4%
15.0%
5.6%
9.1%
10.7%
19.1%
9.1%
20.0%
11.1%
9.1%
7.1%
20.6%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
283
26.1%
39.2%
23.0%
9.9%
1.8%
11
36.4%
9.1%
18.2%
36.4%
0.0%
16
36
50
11
113
22
46
30
123
37.5%
30.6%
30.0%
63.6%
25.7%
22.7%
37.0%
40.0%
24.4%
25.0%
38.9%
28.0%
18.2%
35.4%
27.3%
39.1%
26.7%
33.3%
25.0%
13.9%
22.0%
0.0%
23.9%
18.2%
8.7%
16.7%
24.4%
12.5%
16.7%
18.0%
9.1%
13.3%
22.7%
8.7%
10.0%
14.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
9.1%
1.8%
9.1%
6.5%
6.7%
3.3%
21
28.6%
33.3%
4.8%
19.0%
14.3%
SES wide
4731
29.3%
34.4%
18.3%
14.2%
3.8%
Page 117
Agency
Q70 I would prefer reviewing resumes for SES vacancies rather than executive
core qualifications (ECQs) statements.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
227
229
27.3%
15.4%
35.8%
36.4%
31.7%
31.9%
18.2%
15.0%
11.8%
18.2%
28.2%
15.7%
0.0%
9.7%
4.8%
247
51
271
29.6%
31.4%
26.2%
40.5%
29.4%
34.3%
12.6%
9.8%
15.1%
15.4%
27.5%
19.9%
2.0%
2.0%
4.4%
235
324
33.2%
24.1%
30.2%
30.6%
16.2%
11.7%
17.9%
21.0%
2.6%
12.7%
56
365
103
89
114
136
163
171
307
150
205
180
37.5%
30.4%
35.9%
28.1%
14.0%
16.2%
18.4%
17.5%
30.6%
32.0%
25.9%
22.2%
25.0%
31.2%
28.2%
32.6%
37.7%
30.9%
38.0%
30.4%
36.5%
28.7%
35.6%
32.2%
10.7%
23.3%
15.5%
19.1%
17.5%
16.2%
16.6%
18.7%
12.1%
16.0%
11.7%
15.6%
25.0%
12.6%
18.4%
18.0%
25.4%
27.9%
17.8%
28.7%
17.3%
17.3%
19.0%
20.6%
1.8%
2.5%
1.9%
2.2%
5.3%
8.8%
9.2%
4.7%
3.6%
6.0%
7.8%
9.4%
21
17
11
28
67
12
14.3%
17.6%
36.4%
46.4%
26.9%
33.3%
38.1%
64.7%
36.4%
25.0%
22.4%
16.7%
14.3%
5.9%
9.1%
14.3%
17.9%
25.0%
28.6%
11.8%
9.1%
14.3%
26.9%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
6.0%
16.7%
275
22.9%
39.6%
17.5%
17.8%
2.2%
11
18.2%
27.3%
9.1%
36.4%
9.1%
16
34
47
12
109
23
46
29
120
43.8%
26.5%
27.7%
50.0%
22.9%
21.7%
28.3%
34.5%
22.5%
12.5%
32.4%
29.8%
25.0%
34.9%
21.7%
30.4%
31.0%
34.2%
18.8%
20.6%
14.9%
8.3%
21.1%
13.0%
10.9%
10.3%
16.7%
25.0%
17.6%
21.3%
8.3%
17.4%
30.4%
19.6%
17.2%
22.5%
0.0%
2.9%
6.4%
8.3%
3.7%
13.0%
10.9%
6.9%
4.2%
21
28.6%
19.0%
19.0%
23.8%
9.5%
SES wide
4610
26.4%
33.2%
15.5%
19.5%
5.4%
Page 118
Agency
Q71 My position could be filled using just executive core qualifications without
requiring additional technical qualifications.
Neither
Total # of
Strongly
Agree nor
Strongly
Respondents
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree

Services
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
Development
11
231
231
0.0%
2.6%
5.6%
18.2%
20.8%
11.3%
18.2%
8.7%
5.2%
63.6%
42.9%
39.4%
0.0%
25.1%
38.5%
254
54
274
7.1%
3.7%
1.8%
21.3%
18.5%
7.3%
5.1%
7.4%
9.1%
40.2%
48.1%
40.5%
26.4%
22.2%
41.2%
239
329
8.4%
4.6%
14.2%
14.0%
11.7%
8.2%
36.0%
38.3%
29.7%
35.0%
60
379
107
95
119
147
164
180
318
152
207
181
10.0%
9.8%
4.7%
6.3%
2.5%
5.4%
9.1%
6.1%
7.5%
5.9%
5.8%
7.7%
25.0%
17.9%
16.8%
9.5%
17.6%
15.0%
20.1%
9.4%
17.3%
21.1%
22.7%
18.8%
11.7%
15.6%
3.7%
8.4%
10.9%
3.4%
7.3%
2.8%
9.1%
10.5%
10.6%
7.7%
35.0%
34.8%
39.3%
42.1%
37.8%
44.2%
36.0%
43.3%
45.3%
37.5%
34.8%
37.6%
18.3%
21.9%
35.5%
33.7%
31.1%
32.0%
27.4%
38.3%
20.8%
25.0%
26.1%
28.2%
20
17
11
26
69
12
10.0%
11.8%
0.0%
0.0%
11.6%
8.3%
10.0%
23.5%
9.1%
26.9%
11.6%
25.0%
20.0%
11.8%
0.0%
3.8%
11.6%
0.0%
25.0%
17.6%
27.3%
42.3%
46.4%
50.0%
35.0%
35.3%
63.6%
26.9%
18.8%
16.7%
284
3.2%
10.9%
6.7%
43.3%
35.9%
11
0.0%
18.2%
9.1%
63.6%
9.1%
15
36
51
12
117
23
46
29
124
6.7%
8.3%
2.0%
16.7%
3.4%
4.3%
8.7%
6.9%
9.7%
0.0%
22.2%
7.8%
8.3%
15.4%
17.4%
13.0%
27.6%
20.2%
20.0%
11.1%
7.8%
0.0%
8.5%
13.0%
8.7%
6.9%
11.3%
40.0%
27.8%
31.4%
33.3%
47.0%
39.1%
45.7%
41.4%
43.5%
33.3%
30.6%
51.0%
41.7%
25.6%
26.1%
23.9%
17.2%
15.3%
20
5.0%
20.0%
5.0%
35.0%
35.0%
SES wide
4736
6.0%
16.0%
8.7%
39.8%
29.5%
Page 119
Q72 I have served on an Office of Personnel Management

convened Qualifications Review Board (QRB).
Total # of
Respondents
Yes
No
I dont know
what the QRB is

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
232
233
45.5%
41.8%
27.9%
45.5%
57.3%
69.1%
9.1%
0.9%
3.0%
257
56
278
245
331
26.8%
41.1%
25.2%
24.1%
27.8%
71.6%
57.1%
72.7%
71.8%
70.7%
1.6%
1.8%
2.2%
4.1%
1.5%
60
403
109
98
119
147
165
180
327
154
209
184
35.0%
15.9%
19.3%
39.8%
29.4%
20.4%
28.5%
16.1%
22.9%
22.7%
40.2%
33.7%
65.0%
76.2%
78.0%
54.1%
69.7%
77.6%
70.3%
82.8%
75.2%
75.3%
59.8%
65.2%
0.0%
7.9%
2.8%
6.1%
0.8%
2.0%
1.2%
1.1%
1.8%
1.9%
0.0%
1.1%
21
18
11
29
71
12
38.1%
33.3%
27.3%
37.9%
22.5%
41.7%
57.1%
61.1%
72.7%
55.2%
77.5%
58.3%
4.8%
5.6%
0.0%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
287
24.0%
73.9%
2.1%
11
63.6%
36.4%
0.0%
16
37
51
12
119
23
46
30
124
21
43.8%
27.0%
51.0%
50.0%
20.2%
21.7%
52.2%
33.3%
14.5%
42.9%
56.3%
73.0%
49.0%
50.0%
78.2%
78.3%
47.8%
66.7%
83.9%
47.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
9.5%
SES wide
4819
27.3%
70.4%
2.4%
Agency
Page 120
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Q73 Are you willing to serve, on a regular basis, on an OPM convened

Qualifications Review Boards?
Yes, but I
cant commit
Total # of
Yes, for 3 Yes, for 6 Yes, for 9
to a specific
Respondents
months
months
months
timeframe
No
11
18.2%
18.2%
9.1%
45.5%
9.1%
231
18.2%
9.1%
6.1%
48.1%
18.6%
233
10.3%
11.2%
8.2%
47.6%
22.7%
254
56
277
245
330
13.8%
16.1%
13.4%
13.9%
13.3%
7.5%
8.9%
6.1%
11.4%
8.5%
5.9%
7.1%
3.2%
10.2%
7.3%
49.2%
46.4%
49.8%
38.8%
46.7%
23.6%
21.4%
27.4%
25.7%
24.2%
60
404
109
98
119
146
166
180
326
154
208
182
15.0%
11.4%
12.8%
15.3%
14.3%
11.6%
11.4%
12.2%
12.9%
15.6%
11.1%
17.0%
6.7%
9.7%
8.3%
2.0%
5.0%
12.3%
13.3%
6.1%
7.4%
6.5%
5.3%
8.8%
8.3%
6.4%
9.2%
3.1%
5.9%
7.5%
11.4%
6.7%
6.7%
5.8%
4.3%
7.7%
51.7%
42.8%
45.0%
56.1%
58.8%
56.2%
48.2%
57.8%
40.8%
51.9%
52.4%
44.5%
18.3%
29.7%
24.8%
23.5%
16.0%
12.3%
15.7%
17.2%
32.2%
20.1%
26.9%
22.0%
21
18
11
30
69
12
33.3%
11.1%
18.2%
20.0%
14.5%
16.7%
14.3%
11.1%
18.2%
10.0%
7.2%
0.0%
4.8%
11.1%
18.2%
6.7%
10.1%
16.7%
42.9%
44.4%
27.3%
36.7%
49.3%
58.3%
4.8%
22.2%
18.2%
26.7%
18.8%
8.3%
288
12.2%
6.9%
5.2%
52.4%
23.3%
11
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
72.7%
18.2%
16
37
51
12
119
23
46
30
124
21
4810
12.5%
5.4%
13.7%
8.3%
11.8%
8.7%
23.9%
13.3%
10.5%
28.6%
13.4%
6.3%
10.8%
15.7%
8.3%
8.4%
4.3%
4.3%
3.3%
12.1%
4.8%
8.4%
0.0%
5.4%
11.8%
16.7%
4.2%
0.0%
10.9%
10.0%
7.3%
0.0%
6.8%
37.5%
45.9%
39.2%
58.3%
47.1%
52.2%
43.5%
46.7%
43.5%
52.4%
47.8%
43.8%
32.4%
19.6%
8.3%
28.6%
34.8%
17.4%
26.7%
26.6%
14.3%
23.6%
Page 121
Q74 The OPM Qualifications Review Board (QRB) certification process helps
ensure that the person selected for an SES position is a good leader.
Agree
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
0.0%
6.4%
7.1%
60.0%
48.0%
33.0%
30.0%
31.2%
39.6%
10.0%
10.4%
13.7%
0.0%
4.0%
6.6%
205
48
226
203
281
5.4%
2.1%
6.2%
4.9%
7.5%
36.6%
37.5%
33.2%
42.9%
42.0%
36.1%
33.3%
37.6%
29.6%
30.2%
18.5%
20.8%
14.6%
16.3%
14.2%
3.4%
6.3%
8.4%
6.4%
6.0%
54
274
80
71
106
117
145
145
266
117
184
161
11.1%
9.1%
6.3%
5.6%
12.3%
2.6%
9.0%
10.3%
7.9%
5.1%
3.8%
4.3%
33.3%
35.4%
33.8%
40.8%
45.3%
48.7%
29.7%
37.9%
36.1%
40.2%
37.5%
49.1%
38.9%
37.2%
37.5%
33.8%
25.5%
29.9%
44.8%
33.1%
33.8%
38.5%
37.0%
24.8%
11.1%
12.0%
13.8%
18.3%
17.0%
10.3%
13.1%
15.2%
13.5%
13.7%
17.9%
17.4%
5.6%
6.2%
8.8%
1.4%
0.0%
8.5%
3.4%
3.4%
8.6%
2.6%
3.8%
4.3%
17
12
10
18
59
11
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
11.1%
10.2%
0.0%
52.9%
50.0%
40.0%
11.1%
44.1%
27.3%
29.4%
33.3%
20.0%
44.4%
20.3%
54.5%
11.8%
16.7%
20.0%
22.2%
18.6%
18.2%
5.9%
0.0%
10.0%
11.1%
6.8%
0.0%
224
6.3%
46.4%
29.9%
14.3%
3.1%
10
0.0%
60.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14
29
44
12
84
20
41
24
91
16
7.1%
3.4%
6.8%
8.3%
3.6%
0.0%
12.2%
20.8%
7.7%
18.8%
21.4%
20.7%
50.0%
33.3%
41.7%
15.0%
48.8%
33.3%
34.1%
43.8%
42.9%
37.9%
27.3%
8.3%
33.3%
45.0%
14.6%
25.0%
38.5%
12.5%
21.4%
27.6%
9.1%
33.3%
14.3%
40.0%
19.5%
16.7%
15.4%
18.8%
7.1%
10.3%
6.8%
16.7%
7.1%
0.0%
4.9%
4.2%
4.4%
6.3%
3896
6.8%
39.3%
33.5%
15.0%
5.4%
Total # of
Respondents
Strongly
Agree

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
10
202
197
SES wide
Agency
Page 122
Q75 How many employees do you manage?

Total # of
Respondents
1 to 50
51 to 200
201 to
500
more than
500

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
232
232
27.3%
28.4%
31.9%
36.4%
26.3%
36.6%
9.1%
15.9%
15.1%
27.3%
29.3%
16.4%
256
55
277
243
330
45.3%
58.2%
56.3%
37.4%
27.3%
23.8%
30.9%
28.9%
30.0%
27.3%
9.4%
9.1%
7.9%
19.3%
19.7%
21.5%
1.8%
6.9%
13.2%
25.8%
59
405
109
98
119
147
166
179
325
153
209
183
42.4%
26.4%
34.9%
54.1%
20.2%
21.1%
39.8%
27.9%
27.4%
54.2%
19.1%
26.8%
30.5%
31.1%
40.4%
29.6%
34.5%
27.2%
20.5%
36.3%
27.7%
27.5%
14.8%
55.2%
15.3%
28.1%
13.8%
9.2%
21.8%
16.3%
16.3%
10.6%
16.0%
11.8%
10.5%
9.3%
11.9%
14.3%
11.0%
7.1%
23.5%
35.4%
23.5%
25.1%
28.9%
6.5%
55.5%
8.7%
21
17
11
30
71
12
23.8%
64.7%
100.0%
66.7%
22.5%
91.7%
66.7%
29.4%
0.0%
20.0%
47.9%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
0.0%
13.3%
18.3%
8.3%
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.3%
0.0%
289
45.0%
29.8%
11.8%
13.5%
11
18.2%
45.5%
9.1%
27.3%
16
37
51
12
119
23
46
30
125
21
87.5%
59.5%
88.2%
58.3%
37.8%
95.7%
52.2%
56.7%
19.2%
52.4%
12.5%
29.7%
11.8%
25.0%
48.7%
4.3%
34.8%
26.7%
26.4%
28.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
16.7%
10.1%
0.0%
4.3%
3.3%
21.6%
9.5%
0.0%
8.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
8.7%
13.3%
32.8%
9.5%
SES wide
4812
37.0%
29.9%
14.4%
18.7%
Agency
Page 123
Q76 What is the total budget that you are responsible for in your agency?
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Administration
Administration
Humanities
SES wide
Total # of
Respondents
11
232
232
Under $1
million
9.1%
5.2%
10.8%
$1 million
to $100
million
63.6%
47.0%
52.2%
$101 million
to $500
million
18.2%
20.7%
17.2%
Over
$500
million
9.1%
21.1%
11.2%
I am not
responsible
for a budget
0.0%
6.0%
8.6%
256
56
278
244
330
7.8%
16.1%
9.0%
9.0%
8.5%
35.2%
35.7%
39.6%
38.9%
51.2%
14.5%
10.7%
17.6%
14.8%
20.3%
28.1%
23.2%
24.5%
29.1%
13.9%
14.5%
14.3%
9.4%
8.2%
6.1%
60
403
108
97
119
147
166
179
325
153
209
184
21
18
11
30
71
12
18.3%
15.1%
17.6%
14.4%
8.4%
4.1%
9.0%
3.9%
13.5%
13.1%
5.7%
11.4%
42.9%
11.1%
72.7%
33.3%
2.8%
50.0%
26.7%
53.3%
53.7%
34.0%
26.9%
27.2%
49.4%
30.7%
49.2%
45.8%
28.2%
56.5%
33.3%
27.8%
27.3%
36.7%
47.9%
50.0%
10.0%
11.2%
15.7%
9.3%
14.3%
19.7%
25.3%
17.9%
13.5%
13.1%
36.4%
15.8%
19.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
16.9%
0.0%
23.3%
8.2%
9.3%
20.6%
45.4%
46.3%
11.4%
41.3%
12.6%
19.6%
27.3%
13.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
26.8%
0.0%
21.7%
12.2%
3.7%
21.6%
5.0%
2.7%
4.8%
6.1%
11.1%
8.5%
2.4%
3.3%
4.8%
55.6%
0.0%
23.3%
5.6%
0.0%
289
9.7%
45.7%
20.1%
20.1%
4.5%
11
9.1%
54.5%
36.4%
0.0%
0.0%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
21
4815
37.5%
32.4%
5.8%
16.7%
19.3%
39.1%
6.5%
26.7%
18.4%
28.6%
11.6%
37.5%
21.6%
42.3%
83.3%
65.5%
13.0%
52.2%
56.7%
44.8%
33.3%
44.3%
25.0%
10.8%
34.6%
0.0%
5.9%
0.0%
13.0%
6.7%
12.0%
0.0%
16.4%
0.0%
0.0%
9.6%
0.0%
1.7%
13.0%
13.0%
3.3%
18.4%
28.6%
19.0%
0.0%
35.1%
7.7%
0.0%
7.6%
34.8%
15.2%
6.7%
6.4%
9.5%
8.7%
Page 124
Q77a What is the percentage of your current work that you consider
to be...of a technical/professional nature?
Total # of
Respondent
s
Less
than
10%
10 to
25%
26 to
35%
36 to
45%
46 to
55%
Greater
than
55%

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
228
232
9.1%
9.6%
7.8%
27.3%
31.6%
38.4%
18.2%
23.7%
25.0%
18.2%
14.9%
11.6%
0.0%
7.9%
8.2%
27.3%
12.3%
9.1%
255
56
275
242
328
5.5%
14.3%
8.0%
12.8%
11.3%
32.9%
25.0%
31.3%
27.3%
25.6%
22.7%
26.8%
21.1%
23.6%
24.7%
14.5%
12.5%
14.2%
16.5%
18.0%
10.2%
8.9%
9.5%
9.5%
7.6%
14.1%
12.5%
16.0%
10.3%
12.8%
59
404
108
94
118
147
164
180
324
154
208
184
18.6%
10.6%
6.5%
11.7%
5.9%
4.8%
14.0%
5.0%
7.7%
12.3%
15.9%
15.8%
23.7%
25.2%
31.5%
21.3%
34.7%
33.3%
29.3%
31.1%
29.0%
22.1%
28.4%
33.2%
22.0%
20.0%
26.9%
30.9%
28.8%
23.1%
26.8%
27.8%
22.5%
33.1%
22.1%
20.7%
11.9%
13.1%
10.2%
16.0%
10.2%
17.0%
9.8%
17.2%
14.5%
12.3%
12.0%
12.0%
6.8%
9.4%
9.3%
4.3%
10.2%
10.2%
7.9%
6.7%
7.7%
5.2%
9.1%
7.1%
16.9%
21.5%
15.7%
16.0%
10.2%
11.6%
12.2%
12.2%
18.5%
14.9%
12.5%
11.4%
21
18
11
30
69
12
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
10.1%
0.0%
14.3%
22.2%
18.2%
13.3%
43.5%
25.0%
33.3%
11.1%
9.1%
16.7%
18.8%
25.0%
23.8%
11.1%
18.2%
23.3%
8.7%
16.7%
4.8%
5.6%
18.2%
16.7%
8.7%
8.3%
14.3%
50.0%
36.4%
23.3%
10.1%
25.0%
287
5.6%
31.0%
26.8%
15.7%
10.5%
10.5%
11
27.3%
36.4%
18.2%
9.1%
0.0%
9.1%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
29
125
21
12.5%
2.7%
7.7%
0.0%
10.1%
13.0%
4.3%
13.8%
16.0%
23.8%
12.5%
13.5%
36.5%
8.3%
42.9%
34.8%
37.0%
24.1%
28.8%
23.8%
31.3%
8.1%
21.2%
25.0%
21.8%
34.8%
28.3%
27.6%
20.0%
4.8%
12.5%
13.5%
11.5%
25.0%
10.9%
8.7%
13.0%
13.8%
6.4%
9.5%
12.5%
21.6%
7.7%
16.7%
5.9%
4.3%
6.5%
6.9%
12.8%
23.8%
18.8%
40.5%
15.4%
25.0%
8.4%
4.3%
10.9%
13.8%
16.0%
14.3%
SES wide
4792
9.7%
29.6%
23.7%
13.8%
8.8%
14.4%
Agency
Page 125
Q77b What is the percentage of your current work that you consider to be...of an
advisory nature (to top management)?
Less
Greater
Total # of
than
10 to
26 to
36 to
46 to
than
Respondents
10%
25%
35%
45%
55%
55%
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
10
228
232
20.0%
8.3%
12.1%
40.0%
31.6%
30.6%
20.0%
27.2%
25.0%
10.0%
13.6%
17.7%
10.0%
10.1%
8.2%
0.0%
9.2%
6.5%
254
56
275
244
329
4.7%
12.5%
9.1%
6.1%
7.3%
26.4%
14.3%
27.3%
23.4%
23.1%
28.0%
26.8%
30.2%
31.1%
31.3%
17.3%
26.8%
15.3%
19.3%
14.6%
11.0%
10.7%
8.0%
14.3%
10.0%
12.6%
8.9%
10.2%
5.7%
13.7%
59
403
108
96
119
147
166
179
322
153
206
184
8.5%
14.1%
12.0%
5.2%
5.0%
8.8%
7.2%
8.4%
10.6%
6.5%
21.4%
4.9%
16.9%
25.8%
25.9%
19.8%
20.2%
29.9%
23.5%
30.7%
33.5%
20.3%
23.3%
28.3%
25.4%
25.1%
25.0%
29.2%
31.9%
34.0%
30.7%
29.6%
24.5%
35.9%
27.7%
31.0%
22.0%
15.6%
20.4%
22.9%
16.8%
12.9%
15.1%
15.1%
13.0%
14.4%
10.2%
19.6%
10.2%
7.7%
10.2%
8.3%
11.8%
6.8%
10.8%
6.1%
8.7%
10.5%
11.2%
9.2%
16.9%
11.7%
6.5%
14.6%
14.3%
7.5%
12.7%
10.1%
9.6%
12.4%
6.3%
7.1%
21
18
11
29
70
12
33.3%
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
38.1%
27.8%
45.5%
31.0%
22.9%
50.0%
4.8%
27.8%
0.0%
24.1%
27.1%
16.7%
19.0%
5.6%
27.3%
24.1%
21.4%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
9.1%
0.0%
17.1%
8.3%
4.8%
33.3%
9.1%
20.7%
7.1%
25.0%
286
10.8%
28.0%
30.8%
12.2%
10.1%
8.0%
10
20.0%
20.0%
30.0%
20.0%
0.0%
10.0%
16
37
52
12
117
23
46
30
125
21
12.5%
24.3%
1.9%
8.3%
12.0%
4.3%
2.2%
6.7%
8.0%
0.0%
6.3%
32.4%
36.5%
41.7%
37.6%
4.3%
28.3%
30.0%
36.0%
23.8%
18.8%
10.8%
28.8%
33.3%
29.1%
21.7%
34.8%
26.7%
19.2%
28.6%
37.5%
10.8%
17.3%
8.3%
12.0%
34.8%
21.7%
13.3%
10.4%
23.8%
6.3%
8.1%
5.8%
0.0%
6.8%
17.4%
2.2%
10.0%
8.8%
9.5%
18.8%
13.5%
9.6%
8.3%
2.6%
17.4%
10.9%
13.3%
17.6%
14.3%
SES wide
4788
9.3%
27.1%
28.3%
15.8%
9.3%
10.2%
Page 126
Q77c What is the percentage of your current work that you consider to be...of a
leadership/managerial nature?
Less
Greater
Total # of
than
10 to
26 to
36 to
46 to
than
Respondents
10%
25%
35%
45%
55%
55%
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
231
232
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
18.2%
8.7%
3.0%
9.1%
17.7%
18.1%
9.1%
19.5%
22.8%
27.3%
22.9%
18.5%
36.4%
30.3%
36.6%
255
55
278
244
330
3.1%
0.0%
2.2%
1.2%
1.2%
11.8%
9.1%
11.5%
10.2%
4.2%
19.2%
21.8%
22.7%
19.3%
16.1%
18.4%
23.6%
17.3%
20.5%
18.8%
21.6%
12.7%
18.7%
16.4%
17.3%
25.9%
32.7%
27.7%
32.4%
42.4%
59
405
109
96
119
147
165
179
324
154
207
184
8.5%
2.7%
2.8%
2.1%
3.4%
1.4%
2.4%
0.0%
1.9%
1.3%
1.0%
0.5%
8.5%
7.4%
6.4%
10.4%
5.0%
10.9%
3.6%
8.9%
10.8%
11.0%
5.3%
8.7%
13.6%
13.6%
21.1%
18.8%
16.0%
14.3%
18.2%
24.0%
17.9%
18.2%
11.6%
19.6%
8.5%
16.0%
19.3%
28.1%
22.7%
23.1%
21.8%
19.0%
17.3%
21.4%
13.0%
26.1%
22.0%
18.3%
13.8%
17.7%
15.1%
21.1%
18.8%
23.5%
22.8%
15.6%
15.5%
19.6%
39.0%
42.0%
36.7%
22.9%
37.8%
29.3%
35.2%
24.6%
29.3%
32.5%
53.6%
25.5%
21
18
11
30
71
12
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.5%
11.1%
18.2%
10.0%
5.6%
25.0%
14.3%
5.6%
18.2%
20.0%
16.9%
25.0%
19.0%
27.8%
36.4%
23.3%
21.1%
0.0%
19.0%
16.7%
9.1%
6.7%
21.1%
8.3%
38.1%
33.3%
18.2%
30.0%
35.2%
41.7%
289
1.4%
6.6%
16.6%
19.7%
22.5%
33.2%
11
9.1%
9.1%
9.1%
18.2%
27.3%
27.3%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
21
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.8%
13.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.8%
9.5%
6.3%
10.8%
5.8%
8.3%
5.9%
4.3%
4.3%
10.0%
10.4%
4.8%
12.5%
21.6%
23.1%
41.7%
10.1%
43.5%
19.6%
10.0%
12.8%
14.3%
25.0%
21.6%
28.8%
16.7%
21.0%
17.4%
21.7%
26.7%
8.0%
9.5%
18.8%
21.6%
11.5%
16.7%
31.1%
17.4%
13.0%
13.3%
19.2%
23.8%
37.5%
24.3%
26.9%
16.7%
31.1%
4.3%
39.1%
40.0%
48.8%
38.1%
SES wide
4810
1.8%
8.2%
17.6%
19.3%
19.2%
33.9%
Page 127
Q78 How long have you been with the Federal Government (excluding military
service)?
Less
More
Total # of
than 1
1 to 3
4 to 5
6 to 10
11 to 20
than 20
Respondents
year
years
years
years
years
years
Agency
Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
232
233
9.1%
0.0%
2.6%
27.3%
3.9%
5.6%
9.1%
2.6%
3.4%
0.0%
9.1%
7.7%
18.2%
11.6%
24.0%
36.4%
72.8%
56.7%
253
56
277
244
330
1.2%
0.0%
1.8%
1.2%
0.3%
8.7%
5.4%
4.7%
5.3%
7.0%
5.1%
1.8%
5.8%
2.5%
3.6%
17.4%
5.4%
10.5%
11.5%
14.2%
16.2%
21.4%
21.3%
23.8%
18.8%
51.4%
66.1%
56.0%
55.7%
56.1%
60
407
108
97
119
147
166
180
325
154
209
184
1.7%
1.2%
0.9%
1.0%
1.7%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
1.2%
3.2%
1.0%
0.0%
6.7%
3.2%
4.6%
0.0%
10.9%
5.4%
4.2%
2.8%
4.6%
10.4%
1.9%
2.7%
1.7%
1.2%
1.9%
2.1%
7.6%
6.8%
1.8%
5.6%
1.8%
6.5%
1.0%
0.5%
5.0%
5.9%
10.2%
10.3%
17.6%
19.0%
7.8%
10.0%
6.8%
11.7%
3.8%
3.3%
21.7%
20.4%
19.4%
18.6%
10.1%
11.6%
13.3%
8.3%
14.2%
16.9%
17.2%
14.1%
63.3%
68.1%
63.0%
68.0%
52.1%
57.1%
71.1%
73.3%
71.4%
51.3%
75.1%
79.3%
21
18
11
30
69
12
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
9.1%
0.0%
1.4%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
9.5%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
13.0%
16.7%
4.8%
55.6%
0.0%
26.7%
21.7%
16.7%
81.0%
27.8%
90.9%
70.0%
59.4%
58.3%
288
0.7%
0.7%
4.5%
5.2%
20.5%
68.4%
11
0.0%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
36.4%
54.5%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
125
21
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.7%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
10.9%
23.3%
2.4%
9.5%
12.5%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
6.3%
2.7%
7.7%
0.0%
2.5%
4.3%
6.5%
10.0%
4.8%
0.0%
18.8%
8.1%
21.2%
33.3%
16.8%
52.2%
23.9%
16.7%
17.6%
19.0%
62.5%
89.2%
57.7%
58.3%
80.7%
39.1%
52.2%
50.0%
75.2%
66.7%
SES wide
4814
1.0%
4.7%
3.1%
8.9%
17.9%
64.3%
Page 128
Q79 What is your age?

Total # of
Respondents
Under
30
30 to 39
40 to 49
50 to 59
60 or
older

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
230
233
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2.1%
27.3%
13.5%
24.9%
63.6%
54.8%
44.2%
9.1%
30.0%
28.8%
252
56
276
245
328
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.2%
3.3%
4.0%
17.9%
23.2%
23.6%
25.7%
34.1%
55.2%
42.9%
53.6%
42.0%
50.3%
26.2%
33.9%
20.7%
29.0%
11.6%
59
404
108
96
118
146
166
180
324
154
209
184
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.9%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2.8%
4.5%
0.0%
1.1%
23.7%
36.1%
13.0%
15.6%
14.4%
18.5%
17.5%
20.6%
25.9%
21.4%
18.2%
19.0%
42.4%
49.5%
49.1%
55.2%
61.9%
63.7%
58.4%
54.4%
57.4%
51.3%
51.2%
54.9%
33.9%
11.1%
37.0%
27.1%
23.7%
17.8%
22.9%
25.0%
13.9%
22.7%
30.6%
25.0%
21
18
11
30
70
12
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
0.0%
9.5%
22.2%
0.0%
16.7%
24.3%
33.3%
38.1%
50.0%
72.7%
60.0%
47.1%
33.3%
52.4%
22.2%
27.3%
23.3%
21.4%
33.3%
287
0.0%
0.3%
24.0%
56.1%
19.5%
11
0.0%
9.1%
27.3%
45.5%
18.2%
16
37
52
12
119
23
46
30
124
21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
13.0%
2.2%
3.3%
5.6%
0.0%
18.8%
2.7%
17.3%
25.0%
21.0%
47.8%
26.1%
20.0%
16.9%
19.0%
31.3%
43.2%
44.2%
75.0%
60.5%
34.8%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
66.7%
43.8%
54.1%
38.5%
0.0%
17.6%
4.3%
21.7%
26.7%
27.4%
14.3%
SES wide
4801
0.0%
2.0%
22.8%
52.4%
22.8%
Agency
Page 129
Q80 When do you plan to leave the Federal Government?

Total # of
Respondents
Less
than 1
year
1 to 3
years
4 to 5
years
6 to 10
years
11 to 20
years
More
than 20
years

Development
Department of Labor
Department of State
Commission
Administration
Administration
Humanities
11
230
231
0.0%
8.7%
8.7%
45.5%
32.6%
22.1%
18.2%
21.7%
19.5%
18.2%
26.1%
25.5%
18.2%
10.0%
22.5%
0.0%
0.9%
1.7%
250
56
277
244
328
6.4%
8.9%
7.6%
8.6%
8.5%
25.2%
32.1%
29.2%
29.1%
31.7%
22.8%
19.6%
19.5%
17.2%
15.2%
28.8%
25.0%
28.5%
24.6%
25.3%
13.6%
10.7%
14.1%
17.6%
17.1%
3.2%
3.6%
1.1%
2.9%
2.1%
58
403
107
96
119
147
164
180
322
153
209
184
6.9%
10.7%
10.3%
7.3%
8.4%
6.1%
4.9%
5.6%
9.3%
5.2%
10.0%
6.5%
37.9%
32.0%
34.6%
28.1%
19.3%
17.7%
29.3%
26.7%
36.6%
24.2%
28.2%
25.5%
17.2%
23.6%
16.8%
18.8%
21.8%
24.5%
22.0%
24.4%
17.1%
21.6%
21.5%
18.5%
19.0%
20.8%
26.2%
30.2%
31.1%
26.5%
26.8%
30.6%
23.0%
31.4%
24.9%
29.9%
17.2%
11.2%
9.3%
14.6%
16.0%
23.1%
15.2%
12.2%
12.4%
17.0%
13.9%
19.0%
1.7%
1.7%
2.8%
1.0%
3.4%
2.0%
1.8%
0.6%
1.6%
0.7%
1.4%
0.5%
21
18
11
30
70
12
9.5%
5.6%
9.1%
10.0%
1.4%
0.0%
23.8%
38.9%
9.1%
36.7%
15.7%
41.7%
23.8%
16.7%
36.4%
16.7%
30.0%
33.3%
33.3%
27.8%
45.5%
20.0%
31.4%
16.7%
4.8%
11.1%
0.0%
13.3%
15.7%
8.3%
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
5.7%
0.0%
284
7.4%
23.6%
18.7%
28.5%
20.4%
1.4%
11
0.0%
27.3%
18.2%
9.1%
36.4%
9.1%
16
37
51
12
117
23
44
29
125
21
0.0%
16.2%
7.8%
0.0%
3.4%
4.3%
4.5%
10.3%
10.4%
19.0%
37.5%
51.4%
19.6%
16.7%
24.8%
21.7%
29.5%
34.5%
31.2%
28.6%
37.5%
21.6%
25.5%
25.0%
21.4%
17.4%
20.5%
20.7%
17.6%
19.0%
12.5%
8.1%
29.4%
16.7%
29.9%
30.4%
22.7%
13.8%
16.8%
28.6%
6.3%
0.0%
15.7%
41.7%
18.8%
17.4%
20.5%
20.7%
17.6%
4.8%
6.3%
2.7%
2.0%
0.0%
1.7%
8.7%
2.3%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
SES wide
4782
7.9%
28.4%
20.3%
26.0%
15.5%
2.0%
Agency
Page 130
Appendix 3: Governmentwide Survey Results Comparison 2008 to 2011

Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Career
93.4%
94.9%
-1.5%
Non-Career
5.4%
4.7%
0.7%
Limited Term or
Limited Emergency
1.2%
0.4%
0.8%
Less than 1 year
7.5%
4.2%
3.3%
1 to 3 years
28.6%
30.9%
-2.3%
4 to 5 years
20.0%
17.8%
2.2%
6 to 10 years
23.4%
25.5%
-2.1%
11 to 20 years
16.2%
17.1%
-0.9%
More than 20 years
4.3%
4.5%
-0.2%
47.8%
50.7%
-2.9%
1-2
29.4%
32.5%
-3.1%
3-5
17.1%
14.7%
2.4%
6+
5.6%
2.2%
3.4%
77.3%
90.5%
-13.2%
1-2
17.3%
8.5%
8.8%
3-5
4.6%
0.9%
3.7%
6+
0.9%
0.1%
0.8%
76.6%
81.1%
-4.5%
1-2
16.2%
15.5%
0.7%
3-5
5.1%
3.1%
2.0%
6+
2.1%
0.3%
1.8%
Strongly Agree
36.0%
9.5%
26.5%
Agree
39.3%
22.3%
17.0%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
16.9%
30.7%
-13.8%
Disagree
5.8%
28.7%
-22.9%
Strongly Disagree
2.0%
8.9%
-6.9%
Strongly Agree
66.0%
74.9%
-8.9%
Agree
27.6%
22.0%
5.6%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
4.7%
2.5%
2.2%
Disagree
1.3%
0.5%
0.8%
Strongly Disagree
0.4%
0.2%
0.2%
Question Text 2011 (2008)
Q1(Q44). What type of appointment do you hold?
Q3(Q46). How long have you been a member of

the SES?
Q5a (Q37b). Since becoming a member of the SES,

how many times have you...Changed jobs within
your agency?
Q5b (Q37c). Since becoming a member of the SES,

how many times have you...Changed jobs to work
in a different organization or agency?
Q5c(Q37d). Since becoming a member of the SES,

how many times have you...Changed geographic
locations?
Q6(Q34). Career advancement depends on an

employee's willingness to change positions.
Q7(Q1). I am proud to be a member of the Federal

Governments Senior Executive Service.
Differences deemed statistically significant via t-test have been bolded and appear in red.
Page 131
Q8(Q33). I am interested in more opportunities to

network with other SES members outside my
agency.
Q9(Q2). My work gives me a feeling of personal

accomplishment.
Q10(Q3). My talents are used well in the

workplace.
Q18(Q35). In my organization, there are sufficient

funds available for my job-related development to
maintain up-to-date skills.
Q19(Q36). My developmental needs are assessed.
Q23(Q30). How satisfied are you with the

developmental opportunities you receive?
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Strongly Agree
31.9%
19.7%
12.2%
Agree
40.5%
41.2%
-0.7%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
21.7%
28.3%
-6.6%
Disagree
5.3%
9.3%
-4.0%
Strongly Disagree
0.6%
1.4%
-0.8%
Strongly Agree
61.4%
68.1%
-6.7%
Agree
32.0%
27.2%
4.8%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
3.7%
2.6%
1.1%
Disagree
2.2%
1.6%
0.6%
Strongly Disagree
0.7%
0.4%
0.3%
Strongly Agree
43.1%
48.2%
-5.1%
Agree
42.9%
39.1%
3.8%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
5.4%
4.9%
0.5%
Disagree
6.4%
5.9%
0.5%
Strongly Disagree
2.2%
1.8%
0.4%
Strongly Agree
14.2%
12.3%
1.9%
Agree
42.5%
37.9%
4.6%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
17.3%
22.3%
-5.0%
Disagree
20.1%
18.3%
1.8%
Strongly Disagree
5.9%
9.1%
-3.2%
Strongly Agree
9.7%
6.0%
3.7%
Agree
37.8%
27.9%
9.9%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
24.9%
28.1%
-3.2%
Disagree
21.2%
25.3%
-4.1%
Strongly Disagree
6.4%
9.6%
-3.2%
Very Satisfied
17.6%
19.2%
-1.6%
Satisfied
44.8%
35.9%
8.9%
Neither Satisfied nor

Dissatisfied
25.1%
26.8%
-1.7%
Dissatisfied
10.9%
12.6%
-1.7%
Very Dissatisfied
1.6%
5.5%
-3.9%
Page 132
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Q24a(Q38a). Since becoming a member of the SES,

have you...received a 360-type assessment
Yes
56.2%
41.4%
14.8%
No
43.8%
58.6%
-14.8%
Q24b(Q38b). Since becoming a member of the

SES, have you...been on a developmental
assignment lasting more than 30 days
Yes
17.5%
12.9%
4.6%
No
82.5%
87.1%
-4.6%
Q24c(Q38c). Since becoming a member of the SES,

have you...had a mentor advising you for
developmental purposes
Yes
29.3%
20.5%
8.8%
No
70.7%
79.5%
-8.8%
Q24d(Q38d). Since becoming a member of the

SES, have you...received formal executive
coaching?
Yes
36.2%
24.6%
11.6%
No
63.8%
75.4%
-11.6%
Q24e(Q38e). Since becoming a member of the SES,

have you...attended a residential executive
development program?
Yes
32.4%
30.3%
2.1%
No
67.6%
69.7%
-2.1%
Yes
1.3%
1.1%
0.2%
No
98.7%
98.9%
-0.2%
Strongly Agree
23.4%
18.9%
4.5%
Agree
46.4%
47.2%
-0.8%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
18.0%
19.7%
-1.7%
Disagree
9.0%
11.4%
-2.4%
Strongly Disagree
3.3%
2.8%
0.5%
Strongly Agree
11.1%
17.2%
-6.1%
Agree
27.4%
32.4%
-5.0%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
18.0%
19.8%
-1.8%
Disagree
26.1%
20.6%
5.5%
Strongly Disagree
17.5%
10.1%
7.4%
Strongly Agree
13.8%
11.1%
2.7%
Q24f(Q38f). Since becoming a member of the SES,

have you...taken a sabbatical?
Q27(Q39). My agency is able to attract high quality

senior executives.
Q29(Q40). SES pay and benefits are helpful in

attracting high quality senior executives.
Q31(Q41). The SES application process

discourages high quality candidates from
applying.
Agree
27.7%
24.9%
2.8%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
29.9%
33.7%
-3.8%
Disagree
24.5%
25.6%
-1.1%
Strongly Disagree
4.1%
4.7%
-0.6%
Page 133
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Strongly Agree
22.6%
34.9%
-12.3%
Agree
54.0%
47.9%
6.1%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
10.3%
8.4%
1.9%
Disagree
9.6%
7.0%
2.6%
Strongly Disagree
3.5%
1.9%
1.6%
Strongly Agree
20.5%
29.2%
-8.7%
Agree
47.9%
42.5%
5.4%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
13.8%
12.4%
1.4%
Disagree
13.7%
11.7%
2.0%
Strongly Disagree
4.2%
4.2%
0.0%
Q35(Q6). I received a performance plan in the first

few months of the performance cycle.
Yes
82.3%
83.1%
-0.8%
No
17.7%
16.9%
0.8%
Q36(Q7). I had a discussion about progress on my

performance plan at mid-year in the performance
cycle.
Yes
79.3%
74.3%
5.0%
No
20.7%
25.7%
-5.0%
To a Very Great
Extent
27.6%
29.0%
-1.4%
To a Great Extent
40.6%
38.5%
2.1%
To a Moderate
Extent
19.4%
18.5%
0.9%
To a Limited Extent
8.9%
8.3%
0.6%
Q33(Q4). I understand the SES performance

appraisal system being used in this organization.
Q34(Q5). My performance evaluation takes into

account the most important parts of my job.
Q37a(Q8a). To what extent is your performance

rating based on the following...The performance of
your organization
Q37b (Q8b). To what extent is your performance

rating based on the following...Your individual
performance
Q37c(Q8c). To what extent is your performance

rating based on the following...Customer
perspective
Not at All
3.5%
3.1%
0.4%
To a Very Great
Extent
38.1%
38.2%
-0.1%
To a Great Extent
38.9%
36.1%
2.8%
To a Moderate
Extent
13.8%
15.4%
-1.6%
To a Limited Extent
7.1%
7.3%
-0.2%
Not at All
2.1%
1.8%
0.3%
To a Very Great
Extent
12.2%
13.6%
-1.4%
To a Great Extent
30.1%
29.1%
1.0%
To a Moderate
Extent
27.2%
26.8%
0.4%
To a Limited Extent
19.8%
15.9%
3.9%
Not at All
10.7%
9.5%
1.2%
Page 134
Q37d(Q8d). To what extent is your performance

rating based on the following...Employee
perspective
Q38(Q9). My last performance review helped me to

identify my strengths.
Q39(Q10). My last performance review helped me

to identify areas for improvement.
Q40(Q11). Discussions with my supervisor about

my performance are worthwhile.
Q41(Q12). Discussions with my supervisor about

my development are worthwhile.
Q42(Q13). My performance appraisal is a fair

reflection of my performance.
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
To a Very Great
Extent
6.8%
7.1%
-0.3%
To a Great Extent
21.1%
21.3%
-0.2%
To a Moderate Extent
30.4%
29.6%
0.8%
To a Limited Extent
25.9%
21.9%
4.0%
Not at All
15.8%
14.3%
1.5%
Strongly Agree
10.6%
17.8%
-7.2%
Agree
37.4%
34.2%
3.2%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
26.2%
24.3%
1.9%
Disagree
19.0%
16.6%
2.4%
Strongly Disagree
6.7%
7.1%
-0.4%
Strongly Agree
6.9%
12.0%
-5.1%
Agree
35.1%
31.4%
3.7%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
30.2%
29.5%
0.7%
Disagree
21.0%
19.3%
1.7%
Strongly Disagree
6.8%
7.8%
-1.0%
Strongly Agree
20.4%
25.8%
-5.4%
Agree
43.7%
37.2%
6.5%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
18.3%
16.3%
2.0%
Disagree
11.1%
9.9%
1.2%
Strongly Disagree
6.5%
6.8%
-0.3%
Strongly Agree
15.8%
19.5%
-3.7%
Agree
36.7%
30.6%
6.1%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
27.2%
23.7%
3.5%
Disagree
13.1%
10.9%
2.2%
Strongly Disagree
7.2%
7.4%
-0.2%
Strongly Agree
21.2%
30.3%
-9.1%
Agree
43.8%
37.5%
6.3%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
16.7%
13.0%
3.7%
Disagree
11.6%
10.4%
1.2%
Strongly Disagree
6.7%
7.9%
-1.2%
Page 135
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
To a Very Great
Extent
22.6%
38.0%
-15.4%
To a Great Extent
21.0%
26.4%
-5.4%
To a Moderate
Extent
12.6%
13.3%
-0.7%
To a Limited Extent
13.1%
8.7%
4.4%
Not at All
30.7%
6.3%
24.4%
To a Very Great
Extent
34.2%
45.1%
-10.9%
To a Great Extent
30.0%
26.4%
3.6%
To a Moderate
Extent
13.4%
10.4%
3.0%
To a Limited Extent
10.3%
5.3%
5.0%
Not at All
12.2%
5.5%
6.7%
Strongly Agree
18.0%
25.4%
-7.4%
Agree
32.3%
32.3%
0.0%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
24.8%
13.6%
11.2%
Disagree
14.7%
17.6%
-2.9%
Strongly Disagree
10.2%
11.0%
-0.8%
Strongly Agree
17.8%
23.7%
-5.9%
Agree
37.2%
31.8%
5.4%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
20.7%
15.0%
5.7%
Disagree
15.7%
17.6%
-1.9%
Strongly Disagree
8.6%
11.9%
-3.3%
Strongly Agree
48.8%
55.5%
-6.7%
Agree
42.8%
35.8%
7.0%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
5.7%
5.1%
0.6%
Disagree
1.7%
2.0%
-0.3%
Strongly Disagree
1.0%
1.1%
-0.1%
Yes
89.4%
88.7%
0.7%
No
10.6%
11.3%
-0.7%
Yes
54.1%
57.2%
-3.1%
21.2%
42.8%
-21.6%
24.7%
0.0%
24.7%
Q43(Q14). To what extent is your salary increase

linked to your performance rating?
Q44(Q15). To what extent is your performance

award linked to your performance rating?
Q45(Q16). I understand how my most recent salary

increase was determined.
Q46(Q17). I understand how my most recent

performance award was determined.
Q47(Q18). I am held accountable for achieving

results.
Q48(Q19). Did you participate in the development

of your performance plan?
Q49a(Q20a). Have you received a copy of...Your

agency's Executive Performance Management
System Plan?
No, but I am familiar

with it
No, and I am not
familiar with it
Page 136
Response
Category
Yes
Q49b(Q20b). Have you received a copy of...Your

agency's Executive Compensation Pay Policy?
No, but I am familiar

with it
No, and I am not
familiar with it
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
34.7%
39.8%
-5.1%
25.1%
60.2%
-35.1%
40.1%
0.0%
40.1%
Q50(Q21). Did you receive a briefing or training on

your agency's performance management system?
Yes
66.9%
63.0%
3.9%
No
33.1%
37.0%
-3.9%
Q51(Q22). Were you given a summary of your

agency's SES overall performance ratings,
performance awards and pay adjustments?
Yes
47.2%
35.0%
12.2%
No
52.8%
65.0%
-12.2%
Strongly Agree
3.2%
4.2%
-1.0%
Agree
24.5%
22.0%
2.5%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
31.7%
25.7%
6.0%
Disagree
27.3%
20.7%
6.6%
Strongly Disagree
13.2%
9.9%
3.3%
Yes
90.5%
98.1%
-7.6%
No
9.5%
1.9%
7.6%
Strongly Agree
5.7%
5.8%
-0.1%
Agree
23.5%
20.0%
3.5%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
24.7%
20.4%
4.3%
Disagree
28.3%
16.8%
11.5%
Strongly Disagree
17.7%
11.4%
6.3%
Strongly Agree
8.7%
8.5%
0.2%
Q52(Q23). My agency deals effectively with

executives who perform poorly.
Q53(Q43). Were you evaluated as a member of the

SES on your most recent performance rating?
Q58(Q24). Pay distinctions are meaningfully

Q59(25). Performance awards are meaningfully

Q60(Q26). Pay for the SES should be based on

performance.
Agree
33.9%
23.9%
10.0%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
24.9%
18.6%
6.3%
Disagree
20.0%
11.4%
8.6%
Strongly Disagree
12.6%
9.2%
3.4%
Strongly Agree
48.7%
49.9%
-1.2%
Agree
43.3%
42.8%
0.5%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
6.5%
5.3%
1.2%
Disagree
1.1%
1.3%
-0.2%
Strongly Disagree
0.4%
0.7%
-0.3%
Page 137
Q62(Q27). In my agency, SES pay for

performance promotes better organizational
performance.
Q63(Q28). How satisfied are you with the

recognition you receive for doing a good job?
Q64(Q29). How satisfied are you with your pay?
Q65(Q31). Job changes (i.e.; formal changes in

position and not just shifting responsibilities)
improve senior executives performance.
Q66(Q32). Senior executives should be able to

perform successfully in a wide range of career
positions.
Q77(42a)a. What is the percentage of your

current work that you consider to be...of a
technical/professional nature?
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Strongly Agree
9.7%
13.7%
-4.0%
Agree
32.8%
29.7%
3.1%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
28.9%
31.5%
-2.6%
Disagree
19.7%
17.3%
2.4%
Strongly Disagree
8.9%
7.8%
1.1%
Very Satisfied
17.7%
28.0%
-10.3%
Satisfied
38.4%
38.6%
-0.2%

Dissatisfied
19.6%
13.2%
6.4%
Dissatisfied
17.0%
13.2%
3.8%
Very Dissatisfied
7.3%
7.1%
0.2%
Very Satisfied
11.3%
20.1%
-8.8%
Satisfied
39.8%
40.5%
-0.7%

Dissatisfied
17.4%
14.7%
2.7%
Dissatisfied
22.7%
16.5%
6.2%
Very Dissatisfied
8.7%
8.1%
0.6%
Strongly Agree
17.2%
18.8%
-1.6%
Agree
38.6%
35.8%
2.8%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
31.2%
31.4%
-0.2%
Disagree
10.7%
11.5%
-0.8%
Strongly Disagree
2.3%
2.5%
-0.2%
Strongly Agree
31.4%
27.0%
4.4%
Agree
47.3%
49.7%
-2.4%
Neither Agree nor

Disagree
12.2%
13.2%
-1.0%
Disagree
8.2%
8.5%
-0.3%
Strongly Disagree
1.0%
1.5%
-0.5%
Less than 10%
9.7%
11.6%
-1.9%
10 to 25%
29.6%
31.6%
-2.0%
26 to 35%
23.7%
24.1%
-0.4%
36 to 45%
13.8%
12.6%
1.2%
46 to 55%
8.8%
8.6%
0.2%
Greater than 55%
14.4%
11.6%
2.8%
Page 138
Q77b(Q42b). What is the percentage of your

current work that you consider to be...of an
advisory nature (to top management)?
Q77c(Q42c). What is the percentage of your

current work that you consider to be...of a
leadership/managerial nature?
Q78(Q45). How long have you been with the

Federal Government (excluding military service)?
Q79(Q47). What is your age?
Q80(Q48). When do you plan to leave the Federal

Government?
Response
Category
2011
Percent
2008
Percent
Difference
Less than 10%
9.3%
9.0%
0.3%
10 to 25%
27.1%
29.1%
-2.0%
26 to 35%
28.3%
27.8%
0.5%
36 to 45%
15.8%
15.6%
0.2%
46 to 55%
9.3%
10.4%
-1.1%
Greater than 55%
10.2%
8.0%
2.2%
Less than 10%
1.8%
1.5%
0.3%
10 to 25%
8.2%
6.9%
1.3%
26 to 35%
17.6%
16.5%
1.1%
36 to 45%
19.3%
18.0%
1.3%
46 to 55%
19.2%
20.9%
-1.7%
Greater than 55%
33.9%
36.2%
-2.3%
Less than 1 year
1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1 to 3 years
4.7%
0.8%
3.9%
4 to 5 years
3.1%
0.9%
2.2%
6 to 10 years
8.9%
1.7%
7.2%
11 to 20 years
17.9%
12.7%
5.2%
More than 20 years
64.3%
83.9%
-19.6%
Under 30
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 to 39
2.0%
0.3%
1.7%
40 to 49
22.8%
21.2%
1.6%
50 to 59
52.4%
61.9%
-9.5%
60 or older
22.8%
16.7%
6.1%
Less than 1 year
7.9%
9.9%
-2.0%
1 to 3 years
28.4%
31.7%
-3.3%
4 to 5 years
20.3%
20.5%
-0.2%
6 to 10 years
26.0%
22.9%
3.1%
11 to 20 years
15.5%
13.1%
2.4%
More than 20 years
2.0%
1.8%
0.2%
Page 139
United StateS
Office Of PerSOnnel ManageMent
Employee Services
1900 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20415
ES/ERED/PMI-2012-05

2011 OPM SES Survey Results

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2011 OPM SES Survey Results

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Senior Executive Service

Survey Results for

a New Day for Federal Service

Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................2

Overall Results ...............................................................................................................................3

Executive Development ...............................................................................................................5

Performance Management and Pay ..............................................................................................7

Recruitment and Appointment .....................................................................................................9

Appendix 1: Survey Response Rates Per Agency .....................................................................15

Appendix 2: Survey Results Per Question Per Agency ............................................................16

Appendix 3: Governmentwide Survey Results Comparison 2008 to 2011 ...........................131

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 Survey Questions

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Survey questions with the least favorable responses are as follows:

FY2011 Survey Questions

perform poorly (a 10% increase, Q.52).

FY2011 Survey Questions

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Since becoming a member of the SES, have you

How effective was [completing an Executive

Other unfavorable responses indicated in the data include:

Executive Performance Management and Pay

FY2011 Survey Questions

I understand the SES performance

FY2011 Survey Question

I had a discussion about progress on

FY2011 Survey Question

To what extent is your performance

Least Favorable Responses. Survey questions addressing executive performance management

FY2011 Survey Question

My agency deals effectively with

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Recruitment and Appointment

FY2011 Survey Questions

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 Survey Questions

I have served on an OPM convened

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 SES Survey Results

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Appendix 1: Survey Response Rates Per Agency

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Appendix 2: Survey Results Per Question Per Agency

Q1 What type of appointment do you hold?

Broadcasting Board of Governors

OSD, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, and

Department of Housing and Urban

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

National Aeronautics and Space

National Archives and Records

National Foundation on the Arts and

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Q2 How were you appointed to the SES?

Broadcasting Board of Governors

Department of Health and Human Services

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Q3 How long have you been a member of the SES?

Broadcasting Board of Governors

FY2011 SES Survey Results

Q4a Prior to becoming a member of the SES, how many times

Broadcasting Board of Governors