Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

Sure, Jesus is the Lord
But Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh…
What does this mean?
Christianity has been misled to proclaim a wrong name
for the One Who they worship, now for over 1900 years.
They are the only religion on earth that stubbornly
refuses to acknowledge the name of Whom they worship,
convinced by the names they hear from their pastors and
read in their establishment ‘Bibles’. Yet some wonder
what the name of the impostor who is foretold to come
will be, though the answer is under their very noses.

What is the name of the anointed of the Lie?

the LorD XëzVs ChrIstos
D + C= 600
L + X = 60
V + I = __6

666

Transliterated to Classical Hebrew, in Aramaic letters
this would be:

‫דְ ֹלרְ דּ ח ֵז̀ ֻס כְרִ ̀ ְסט ֹס‬
60 9 60 200 20

60 7 8

4+4 200 30

4

349 + 75 + 238 + 4 = 666
And it also adds up to 666 in Hebrew numerals!

It only makes sense that this should be thus, since if the
Lie came by any other name, Christians would not be
willing to switch, because it’s new, and Satan has not
been idle for these 2000 years! Plus, since this is not the
true name of Who we do worship, there is no reason the
Lie cannot come by this name. MattithYâ´huw
(“matthew”) 24: 4-5 does not say “many shall come by
My name”, it actually says:
“Beware, lest anyone cause you to wander astray!

1 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

For many shall come against My name, saying I am the
Anointed One”
Yet they will cause many to wander astray.”

So if this is not the true name of Who we worship, what
does this false name really mean?
“I have come by the name of My Father, yet ye do not accept
Me; whenever another might come by his OWN name,
that one then ye will receive!”
(Yâhuwchânâ´n (“john”) 5: 43)

‫ֹלרְ דּ‬
the LorD is a direct translation of Ha-Bá`al, the idol
which ’ËliyYâ´huw (“elijah”) showed to be a Lie in 1 Kings
18:16-40! Why else would it be foretold as an end-time
event that He shall remove the names of the Baals from
our lips? (Howshë´a` (“hosea”) 2: 13-17)
Note: ’Athonâ´y is a term in Hebrew meaning "my Sovereign". It is often found in
scripture referring to my Sovereign Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. In establishment versions,
they replace this title with "the Lord", which is a mistranslation. Many near-miss
namer groups get quite confused by this somehow believing this an accurate
translation and avoid ’Athonâ´y also as though it could mean Bá`al. Then we see
traditionalists using their obvious confusion for an excuse to continue calling on "the
LORD".

‫ח ֵז̀ ֻס‬
XëzVs (chëzús) actually means Gaze-at-Zeus! in Hebrew,
though certainly it did not originate from the name of
Zeus. It is derived from Strong’s #02372, ‫ חזה‬to gaze at,
in its imperative male plural form, ּ ‫ חֵזו‬combined with
“Zeus” transliterated to Hebrew, ‫ז ֻס‬. The sinister aspect
of this is that what we spiritually gaze at, we become like.
[Phílippos 48] And who is Zeus? As Zeus is the one for
which the altar at Pérgamos called “the Throne of Zeus”
was also called “the Throne of Sâţâ´n” in Disclosure 2:
12-13 (“Revelation”), thus the real meaning of XëzVs is
Gaze at Sâţâ´n!

2 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

‫כְרִ ̀ ְסט ֹס‬
ChrIstos is a Greek word meaning anointed. The
Anointed we worship is not Greek, nor are we Greek to
call Him something in Greek.
How on earth could something like this have been
allowed to happen? Why?
Have you ever lined people up and whispered in the ear of
the first, and had them transmit the message along, and
seen what comes out the other end? Well, that is what
essentially has happened to His name through the
centuries. Have you heard how a frog can be boiled alive
without resistance? Put him in the kettle when the water
is cold and gradually heat it, and he won't jump out. The
same thing has happened to Christianity. If anyone would
have tried to sell the apostles the names Christianity uses
today, they would have jumped out, like the proverbial
frog. They would have known everything those names
really mean too.
The scholars and our religious leaders should have gone
to the original in their translations and searches for the
Truth, but they settled for tradition. Why did they do this,
you might legitimately ask?
To not "make waves",
disturbing the slumber the false traditions cause. Why
offend any denomination and threaten their income?
Thus their motivations were either $$$ and/or fame and
honor from humans.
“So through permitting this thing, Yâ-hwéh will send to them
an operation of fraudulence, for them to believe in the Lie,
In order that all who did not believe the Truth, who instead
delighted in the Wickedness may be judged!”
2 Thess. 2: 11-12
“Therefore this is what Yâ-hwéh says: Behold, I am permitting
to be put before this people obstacles, and they will stumble

3 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

over them – fathers and sons alike, a neighbor and his friend,
they shall perish! ”
YirmYâ´huw (“jeremiah”) 6: 21

What is the name of the True Anointed?

‫יָהְו̀ ֶה י ָהו ּ ֻ֨שׁ ַע‬
Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`

The name “Yâ-hwéh” is documented well to be the best
transliteration of the above correctly pointed Hebrew
name (on your right)
[Want proof? see http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/name.htm].
The transliterated name “Yâhuwshúa`” is a transcription,
letter by letter, of the above correctly pointed Hebrew
name (the one on your left). Some ask why “uw” and not
“w” or “u”? I do this to distinguish this “u” (ּ ‫ ו‬shuwreq)
from this “u” (ֻ qibbuts). Transliterations that reproduce
their sounds accurately are acceptable, such as Yâhuéh,
Iâhuéh, and Yâhushua, Iâhushua, etc. In other languages,
other letters should be used according to their different
phonetical rules, e.g. “Iâjuéh Iâjuwshúa`” in Spanish.
The scriptural source of this name, Yâhuwshúa`, is
ZkharYâ´hu (“zechariah”) 6:11-12 in the Hebrew Old
Testament (Tenákh), which is the prediction about what
the name of the Branch was going to be. There it says
“Yâhuwshúa` Ben-Yâhuwtsâthâ´q” (Son of Yâ´huw’s
Righteousness). There is no need to do a “Bible code”
megacomputer search to find it out.
lwdg:h Nhk:h qduwhy-Nb eswhy sar:b tmv:w twrje tyve:w
bhz:w-Pok txql:w
ZkharYâ´hu (“zechariah”) 6:11

Understand that this name, Yâhuwshúa`, was the same
name Moshéh (“moses”) renamed Howshë´a` (“hosea”)
the son of Núwn when he sent him out to spy the Land.
And why did he give him this name?
4 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

8.

9.

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

…With this purpose that all the people might give ear only to
him alone, because the Father would manifest all things
concerning His Son Yâhuwshúa` in Yâhuwshúa` the son of
Núwn!
So therefore this was the name Moshéh gave him when he
sent him to spy out the land of Qná`an…”
Letter of Bar-Nâvíy 12: 8-9

Note how in the establishment renditions of the name of
this son of Núwn in the “New Testament” went through
the same distortion process as that of the name of the
Anointed One, and also wound up calling him “Jesus”
(“Acts” 7:45, “Hebrews” 4:8, and “Epistle of Barnabas”
12:8-11). It is ironic that many who distort and corrupt

the name of our Savior do recognize Yâhuwshúa` as the
proper name of “joshua” the son of Núwn, but cannot
come to apply it to our Savior!
Yet there are many different renditions and versions that
are being preached by various “sacred name groups”.
Why? These near-misses are a Satanic safety net of sorts
to ensnare those lost sheep who seek the Truth short of
their intended goal. Any doubt? Just look at their fruits:
Exclusivism, racial bigotry, hatred, hostility, division
among themselves, and a myriad of incorrect doctrines,
so false even most Christians recognize them to be false!
Ye shall know them by their fruits. The most common of
these false near-miss names is “yahshua”.
The name is NOT “yahshua`”!
1) There is no such a name in Hebrew Scriptures and
no question that the “w” (‫ )ו‬is in the Hebrew Scriptures’
(ZkharYâ´hu 6:11-12) prophecy of His name, as also in
every other place there where it appears correctly
spelled!
2) Whenever ‫ יהו‬appears in names, it is ּ ‫( י ָהו‬Yâ´huw),
e.g. ’ËliyYâ´huw, Yshá`Yâhuw, YirmYâ´huw, etc., and
pronounced with the H as in English “Yahoo”, so there
is no valid excuse for changing its pronunciation to
5 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

“yah” or to “yaw” whenever it occurs at the beginning of
a name.
3) Jewish scribes changed it to “‫( ”י ְהוֹ‬yehow) whenever
it occurred at the beginning of a name, to prevent
breaking their altered version of the 3rd commandment
to not say the name of Yâ-hwéh since Yâ´huw is the
same name in the “shortened form” (preterit/jussive
tense).
4) The excuse that “yahshua” is an accepted Jewish
nickname of Yâhuwshúa`, is renaming Him and
preferring the Lie! A mistake just like believing in the
name “Jesus”!
5) The reasoning that latter-day Yisr’ëlíy or Yâhuwthíy
Hebrew pronounced Yâhuwshúa` as “yâhshua`” due to
the degeneration of Hebrew weak letters is accepting a
degenerated name! Just like “Jesus”!
The name is NOT “yahuwsha`”!

There is another near-miss name corruption going around
more recently that needs to be debunked here also
because its more sophisticated origin makes it more
dangerous: “yahuwsha` ‫”י ָהוּשָׁע‬. Proponents of this false
name derive this from an errant rendition of the vowel
points in eswhy. This is based on the deception caused by
the mistaken Masoretic text vowel point rendition of
ַ ֻ‫אלִישׁ‬
ֵ as being “’ëliyshâ` ‫אלִישָׁע‬
ֵ ”, which
’Ëliyshúa` ‫ע‬
appears in establishment translations as “elisha”, though
lexicons admit it to be a contracted form of ’Ëliyshúwa`.
This mistake stems from thinking it is derived from the
verb yâshâ` (to save/rescue) rather than shúwa` (riches,
deliverance, freedom). Some go as far as to argue that
–shúa` cannot be part of our Savior’s name since Shúwa`
was the name of a “Canaanitess”, without realizing that
the Canaanites spoke Hebrew! But now let us prove
scripturally that it is -shúa` and not -shâ` that is in our
Savior’s name:
12. ¶ For about this [the testimony professed for deliverance],
there is not a difference between a Yâhuwthíy or a Greek, for
the same Yâ´hu, the Sovereign of all of them, is Shúa`
6 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

(riches, freedom) for all of those who invoke Him,
Romans 10:12

In the KJV it says there, “is rich”, a meaning which is not
found in yâshâ` (to save). See also this verse:
94. (87)...The sons of the bridal chamber have just one name
among them, the Repose, for they shall both share It mutually,
making them to not need anything. 95. (88) They do not need
to take any other form [of the name] because they have
contemplation, comprehending it by insight. They are
wealthy [shúa`] because they did not lay up their treasure in
the things below, which are despised, but in the honors that
are above, though they had not yet known them.
Glad Tidings of Phílippos 94-95
This deception of Christianity and its consequences is
foretold in Scripture
13. The authorities wanted to deceive the sons of ’Âthâ´m,
since they saw that these had kinship with those who are truly
good: they removed the name [Yâhuwshúa`] from those that
are good and delivered it to become ones that are not good
[“Jesus”, “Yeshua”, etc.], so that through the names they
might deceive them [those that are good] and bind them to
those that are not good. And afterwards, if He has favor on
them, He shall cause them to separate from those that are not
good so to integrate them among those that are good, these
who have acknowledged Him themselves, for they [the
authorities] wanted to take the free man and make him a
slave to them forever.
Glad Tidings of Phílippos 13

Christianity is spiritual Yisrâ’Ë´l (“Israel”) because they
worship the Pure One of Yisrâ’Ë´l (“Israel”) in spirit and
in Truth [see Who’s who]. It is written that Yisrâ’Ë´l
(“Israel”) is in deep adultery chasing after foreign mighty
ones. Because of this, Christians are happy to believe the
Jewish fable that the Jews alone are “Israel”. But
Christianity is who provokes Him to jealousy with their
false deities and spiritual adultery with Baal (Lord, Señor,
7 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

Domine), Fortune (God, Deus, Mammon), and Zeus
(Diós). It is a part of prophecy that we cannot worship
Him because He is a pure mighty Ones (“Joshua”
24:19-20) and that the curses of disobedience will come
and though we number as the sand of the sea, we will be
reduced to just a few because we did not revere the
awesome name of Yâ-hwéh. (Deut. 28: 58-62) This is
part of the mystery of Yâ-hwéh, the blindness of the
majority of Christianity until they are destroyed and the
fullness of the heathens are come into the Kingdom
(Romans 11: 25). Satan was sent to make them blind in
“Isaiah” 6, and he does it with a spirit of the anointed of
the Lie (“antichrist”). Remember that Satan is the
author of the Lie.
“Who is the liar, if not he who is denying that Yâhuwshúa` is
the Anointed One? And this one is an anointed of the Lie,
he who is denying the Father and the Son.”
1 Yâhuwchânâ´n (1 “john”) 2:22

And this is how to distinguish the spirits of Yâ-hwéh from
the Lie:
1.
Beloved, do not believe every spirit; instead scrutinize the
spirits whether they are from Yâ-hwéh, because many
predicators of the Lie have gone out into the world.
2.
By this, ye recognize the spirit of Yâ-hwéh: every spirit
which professes that Yâhuwshúa` is the Anointed One Who
has come in flesh, is from Yâ-hwéh;
But every spirit that does not profess Yâhuwshúa`, is not
3.
from Yâ-hwéh — and this is that spirit of the anointed of the
Lie, which ye have heard that it shall come, and now it is
already within the world,
1 Yâhuwchânâ´n (1 “john”) 4:1-3

What implications does this have for the spiritual
manifestations of Pentecostals who haven’t even heard
the true name? They have been “baptized” into the
wrong spirit! Then how do we obtain the true spirit of
Truth, the Advocate (“Comforter”), the spirit of the Pure
8 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

One? Professing the correct name we are sent this true
spirit from the Father:
“But the Advocate, the spirit of the Pure One that the Father
will send by My name, that One will teach you all things, and
will bring to your remembrance all things which I said to
you.”
Yâhuwchânâ´n (“john”) 14:26

An awesome prediction Christians have fulfilled:
7 (10) Now, I know this secret: the sinners shall alter and
adulterate into many forms the Word of Truth (Yâhuwshúa`)
8 and they shall proffer wicked words; they shall lie and
create a great Creature and they shall write scrolls upon their
own words!
Chanówkh (“enoch”) 104:7-8

How did this false name “Jesus” originate?
It did not originate from “Zeus”.

The Satan-mediated de-evolution from the
name of the Creator to the name of the
creature
“...who exchanged the Truth of Yâ-hwéh for the Lie, and
reverenced and served the creature beyond the Creator,
Who is blessed for the ages, ’Âmë´n.” Romans 1: 25

Yâhuwshúa` (‫ע‬
ַ ‫)י ָהו ּ ֻ֨שׁ‬
was exchanged for a corrupted version by Jewish scribes
in order to not say Yâ´huw:

yehowshúa` (‫ע‬
ַ ‫)י ְהוֹ ֻ֨שׁ‬
Since that has no meaning, Jews routinely change it for
the nickname “salvation”:

yeshuw`â´h (‫עָה‬
̀ ּ ‫)י ְשׁו‬
Moreover, there exists a Jewish Conspiracy where the
true name was substituted by:

yeshuw(a) (‫)ישׁו‬
9 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

Which is an acronym for “Yemach Shemow W-zikhrow”,
meaning, “May His name and memory be erased”, and it
was used in the “Toldoth yeshu”, a very old rabbinical
Judaist document that scorned the Anointed. Many still
fall for this, calling Him “yeshua”.
These Jewish pseudonyms were transliterated into Koiné
Greek, which has no “sh” sound,

iesoú (’Ιησου)̃
And which routinely alters proper names, conjugating
them:

iesoús (’Ιησου̃ς)
The Romans transliterated that, giving it the Latin “-vs”
(-us) masculine suffix:

iesús (IESVS)
In the 14th century, initial “I” letters were extended
below the line in order to distinguish it from the “l”

iesús (jesús)
In the 16th century, the “J” version of the “I” adopted a
new sound, like an “X”. Which is why Yâhuwchânâ´n
would have spelled it “XEZVS” in Roman letters:

Xesús (Jesús)
Why are all the above names but one in green? Because
all are lies except the one in red. There are MANY lies,
and the impostor will accept them ALL except the
Truth. But his main alias, when this Lie shall come,
whose spirit has already been in the world, shall be one
international name, which is palatable to Christians all
over:

The Lord Xëzv́s Christos
Repent! Renounce the Lie, and accept Yâhuwshúa` as
being your savior, believe on His name, and that He was
Who died and rose again, and testify that:
“Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh” (Romans 10:9-10)
There is neither release from sin (1 Yâhuwchânâ´n (“1
john”) 2: 12, Deeds (“acts”) 10:43), nor salvation from the
coming Judgment in any false name!
10 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Yâhuwshúa` is NOT Jesus

http://www.yahuwshua.org/en/jesus666.htm

“This is the Stone that has been rejected by you, the builders,
Which is become for the Chief Cornerstone.
And there is salvation in no other one, for neither is there
another name that has been given by Yâ-hwéh among men by
which we must be saved.” Deeds (“acts”) 4: 11-12
OTHERWISE,
5 (6) Woe to you, witnesses of the Lie, and to you who add
weight to the value of the Wickedness, for you shall suddenly
perish.
Chanówkh (“Enoch 1”) 94:5
24 (15) Woe to you who write down the word of the Lie, and
irreverent words: because they record their Lies, in order that
the people may heed them and that they do harm to their
neighbor. [ZkharYâ´hu 5]
25 Therefore for them there shall be no shâlówm (peace,
completeness, reconciliation); rather they shall suddenly
perish.
Chanówkh (“Enoch 1”) 96:24-25
So therefore, now you understand why we say,
Sure, Jesus is the Lord (Gaze-at-Zeus! is Ha-Bá`al)

but Yâhuwshúa` is Yâ-hwéh.
See the video: Yâhuwshúa` is not Jesus!

11 of 11

31/12/15 03:39

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful