This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Classical Electromagnetism
an upperdivision undergraduate level lecture course given by
Richard Fitzpatrick
Assistant Professor of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Fall 1997
Email: rfitzp@farside.ph.utexas.edu, Tel.: 5124719439
Homepage: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/em1/em.html
1 Introduction
1.1 Major sources
The textbooks which I have consulted most frequently whilst developing course
material are:
Introduction to electrodynamics: D.J. Griﬃths, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall,
Englewood Cliﬀs NJ, 1989).
Electromagnetism: I.S. Grant and W.R. Phillips (John Wiley & Sons, Chich
ester, 1975).
Classical electromagnetic radiation: M.A. Heald and J.B. Marion, 3rd edi
tion (Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth TX, 1995).
The Feynman lectures on physics: R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M.
Sands, Vol. II (AddisonWesley, Reading MA, 1964).
1
1.2 Outline of course
The main topic of this course is Maxwell’s equations. These are a set of eight
ﬁrst order partial diﬀerential equations which constitute a complete description
of electric and magnetic phenomena. To be more exact, Maxwell’s equations con
stitute a complete description of the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds.
You are all, no doubt, quite familiar with the concepts of electric and magnetic
ﬁelds, but I wonder how many of you can answer the following question. “Do
electric and magnetic ﬁelds have a real physical existence or are they just the
oretical constructs which we use to calculate the electric and magnetic forces
exerted by charged particles on one another?” In trying to formulate an answer
to this question we shall, hopefully, come to a better understanding of the nature
of electric and magnetic ﬁelds and the reasons why it is necessary to use these
concepts in order to fully describe electric and magnetic phenomena.
At any given point in space an electric or magnetic ﬁeld possesses two proper
ties, a magnitude and a direction. In general, these properties vary from point to
point. It is conventional to represent such a ﬁeld in terms of its components mea
sured with respect to some conveniently chosen set of Cartesian axes (i.e., x, y,
and z axes). Of course, the orientation of these axes is arbitrary. In other words,
diﬀerent observers may well choose diﬀerent coordinate axes to describe the same
ﬁeld. Consequently, electric and magnetic ﬁelds may have diﬀerent components
according to diﬀerent observers. We can see that any description of electric and
magnetic ﬁelds is going to depend on two diﬀerent things. Firstly, the nature of
the ﬁelds themselves and, secondly, our arbitrary choice of the coordinate axes
with respect to which we measure these ﬁelds. Likewise, Maxwell’s equations, the
equations which describe the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds, depend on
two diﬀerent things. Firstly, the fundamental laws of physics which govern the
behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds and, secondly, our arbitrary choice of
coordinate axes. It would be nice if we could easily distinguish those elements of
Maxwell’s equations which depend on physics from those which only depend on
coordinates. In fact, we can achieve this using what mathematicians call vector
ﬁeld theory. This enables us to write Maxwell’s equations in a manner which
is completely independent of our choice of coordinate axes. As an added bonus,
Maxwell’s equations look a lot simpler when written in a coordinate free manner.
2
In fact, instead of eight ﬁrst order partial diﬀerential equations, we only require
four such equations using vector ﬁeld theory. It should be clear, by now, that we
are going to be using a lot of vector ﬁeld theory in this course. In order to help
you with this, I have decided to devote the ﬁrst few lectures of this course to a
review of the basic results of vector ﬁeld theory. I know that most of you have
already taken a course on this topic. However, that course was taught by some
body from the mathematics department. Mathematicians have their own agenda
when it comes to discussing vectors. They like to think of vector operations as a
sort of algebra which takes place in an abstract “vector space.” This is all very
well, but it is not always particularly useful. So, when I come to review this topic
I shall emphasize those aspects of vectors which make them of particular interest
to physicists; namely, the fact that we can use them to write the laws of physics
in a coordinate free fashion.
Traditionally, an upper division college level course on electromagnetic theory
is organized as follows. First, there is a lengthy discussion of electrostatics (i.e.,
electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charge distributions) and all of its applica
tions. Next, there is a discussion of magnetostatics (i.e., magnetic ﬁelds generated
by steady current distributions) and all of its applications. At this point, there is
usually some mention of the interaction of steady electric and magnetic ﬁelds with
matter. Next, there is an investigation of induction (i.e., electric and magnetic
ﬁelds generated by time varying magnetic and electric ﬁelds, respectively) and its
many applications. Only at this rather late stage in the course is it possible to
write down the full set of Maxwell’s equations. The course ends with a discussion
of electromagnetic waves.
The organization of my course is somewhat diﬀerent to that described above.
There are two reasons for this. Firstly, I do not think that the traditional course
emphasizes Maxwell’s equations suﬃciently. After all, they are only written down
in their full glory more than three quarters of the way through the course. I ﬁnd
this a problem because, as I have already mentioned, I think that Maxwell’s equa
tions should be the principal topic of an upper division course on electromagnetic
theory. Secondly, in the traditional course it is very easy for the lecturer to fall
into the trap of dwelling too long on the relatively uninteresting subject matter at
the beginning of the course (i.e., electrostatics and magnetostatics) at the expense
of the really interesting material towards the end of the course (i.e., induction,
3
Maxwell’s equations, and electromagnetic waves). I vividly remember that this
is exactly what happened when I took this course as an undergraduate. I was
very disappointed! I had been looking forward to hearing all about Maxwell’s
equations and electromagnetic waves, and we were only able to cover these topics
in a hurried and rather cursory fashion because the lecturer ran out of time at
the end of the course.
My course is organized as follows. The ﬁrst section is devoted to Maxwell’s
equations. I shall describe how Maxwell’s equations can be derived from the
familiar laws of physics which govern electric and magnetic phenomena, such
as Coulomb’s law and Faraday’s law. Next, I shall show that Maxwell’s equa
tions possess propagating wave like solutions, called electromagnetic waves, and,
furthermore, that light, radio waves, and Xrays, are all diﬀerent types of elec
tromagnetic wave. Finally, I shall demonstrate that it is possible to write down
a formal solution to Maxwell’s equations, given a sensible choice of boundary
conditions. The second section of my course is devoted to the applications of
Maxwell’s equations. We shall investigate electrostatic ﬁelds generated by sta
tionary charge distributions, conductors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, the en
ergy and momentum carried by electromagnetic ﬁelds, and the generation and
transmission of electromagnetic radiation. This arrangement of material gives
the proper emphasis to Maxwell’s equations. It also reaches the right balance
between the interesting and the more mundane aspects of electromagnetic the
ory. Finally, it ensures that even if I do run out of time towards the end of the
course I shall still have covered Maxwell’s equations and electromagnetic waves
in adequate detail.
One topic which I am not going to mention at all in my course is the interaction
of electromagnetic ﬁelds with matter. It is impossible to do justice to this topic
at the college level, which is why I always prefer to leave it to graduate school.
4
2 Vector assault course
2.1 Vector algebra
In applied mathematics physical quantities are represented by two distinct classes
of objects. Some quantities, denoted scalars, are represented by real numbers.
Others, denoted vectors, are represented by directed line elements: e.g.
→
PQ. Note
P
Q
that line elements (and therefore vectors) are movable and do not carry intrinsic
position information. In fact, vectors just possess a magnitude and a direction,
whereas scalars possess a magnitude but no direction. By convention, vector
quantities are denoted by boldfaced characters (e.g. a) in typeset documents and
by underlined characters (e.g. a) in longhand. Vectors can be added together
but the same units must be used, like in scalar addition. Vector addition can be
represented using a parallelogram:
→
PR=
→
PQ +
→
QR. Suppose that a ≡
→
PQ≡
→
SR,
P
Q
S
R
b ≡
→
QR≡
→
PS, and c ≡
→
PR. It is clear from the diagram that vector addition is
5
commutative: e.g., a +b = b +a. It can also be shown that the associative law
holds: e.g., a + (b +c) = (a +b) +c.
There are two approaches to vector analysis. The geometric approach is based
on line elements in space. The coordinate approach assumes that space is deﬁned
by Cartesian coordinates and uses these to characterize vectors. In physics we
adopt the second approach because we can generalize it to ndimensional spaces
without suﬀering brain failure. This is necessary in special relativity, where three
dimensional space and onedimensional time combine to form fourdimensional
spacetime. The coordinate approach can also be generalized to curved spaces,
as is necessary in general relativity.
In the coordinate approach a vector is denoted as the row matrix of its com
ponents along each of the Cartesian axes (the x, y, and z axes, say):
a ≡ (a
x
, a
y
, a
z
). (2.1)
Here, a
x
is the xcoordinate of the “head” of the vector minus the xcoordinate
of its “tail.” If a ≡ (a
x
, a
y
, a
z
) and b ≡ (b
x
, b
y
, b
z
) then vector addition is deﬁned
a +b ≡ (a
x
+b
x
, a
y
+b
y
, a
z
+b
z
). (2.2)
If a is a vector and n is a scalar then the product of a scalar and a vector is
deﬁned
na ≡ (na
x
, na
y
, na
z
). (2.3)
It is clear that vector algebra is distributive with respect to scalar multiplication:
e.g., n(a +b) = na +nb.
Unit vectors can be deﬁned in the x, y, and z directions as i ≡ (1, 0, 0),
j ≡ (0, 1, 0), and k ≡ (0, 0, 1). Any vector can be written in terms of these unit
vectors
a = a
x
i +a
y
j +a
z
k. (2.4)
In mathematical terminology three vectors used in this manner form a basis of
the vector space. If the three vectors are mutually perpendicular then they are
termed orthogonal basis vectors. In fact, any set of three noncoplanar vectors
can be used as basis vectors.
6
Examples of vectors in physics are displacements from an origin
r = (x, y, z) (2.5)
and velocities
v =
dr
dt
= lim
δt→0
r(t +δt) −r(t)
δt
. (2.6)
Suppose that we transform to new orthogonal basis, the x
, y
, and z
axes,
which are related to the x, y, and z axes via rotation through an angle θ around
the zaxis. In the new basis the coordinates of the general displacement r from the
θ
y
x
/
x
y
/
origin are (x
, y
, z
). These coordinates are related to the previous coordinates
via
x
= xcos θ +y sinθ,
y
= −xsinθ +y cos θ, (2.7)
z
= z.
We do not need to change our notation for the displacement in the new basis. It
is still denoted r. The reason for this is that the magnitude and direction of r
are independent of the choice of basis vectors. The coordinates of r do depend on
the choice of basis vectors. However, they must depend in a very speciﬁc manner
[i.e., Eq. (2.7) ] which preserves the magnitude and direction of r.
Since any vector can be represented as a displacement from an origin (this is
just a special case of a directed line element) it follows that the components of a
7
general vector a must transform in an analogous manner to Eq. (2.7). Thus,
a
x
= a
x
cos θ +a
y
sinθ,
a
y
= −a
x
sinθ +a
y
cos θ, (2.8)
a
z
= a
z
,
with similar transformation rules for rotation about the y and zaxes. In the
coordinate approach Eq. (2.8) is the deﬁnition of a vector. The three quantities
(a
x
, a
y
, a
z
) are the components of a vector provided that they transform under
rotation like Eq. (2.8). Conversely, (a
x
, a
y
, a
z
) cannot be the components of
a vector if they do not transform like Eq. (2.8). Scalar quantities are invariant
under transformation. Thus, the individual components of a vector (a
x
, say)
are real numbers but they are not scalars. Displacement vectors and all vectors
derived from displacements automatically satisfy Eq. (2.8). There are, however,
other physical quantities which have both magnitude and direction but which are
not obviously related to displacements. We need to check carefully to see whether
these quantities are vectors.
2.2 Vector areas
Suppose that we have planar surface of scalar area S. We can deﬁne a vector
area S whose magnitude is S and whose direction is perpendicular to the plane,
in the sense determined by the righthand grip rule on the rim. This quantity
S
clearly possesses both magnitude and direction. But is it a true vector? We know
that if the normal to the surface makes an angle α
x
with the xaxis then the area
8
seen in the xdirection is S cos α
x
. This is the xcomponent of S. Similarly, if the
normal makes an angle α
y
with the yaxis then the area seen in the ydirection is
S cos α
y
. This is the ycomponent of S. If we limit ourselves to a surface whose
normal is perpendicular to the zdirection then α
x
= π/2 − α
y
= α. It follows
that S = S(cos α, sinα, 0). If we rotate the basis about the zaxis by θ degrees,
which is equivalent to rotating the normal to the surface about the zaxis by −θ
degrees, then
S
x
= S cos(α −θ) = S cos αcos θ +S sinαsinθ = S
x
cos θ +S
y
sinθ, (2.9)
which is the correct transformation rule for the xcomponent of a vector. The
other components transform correctly as well. This proves that a vector area is
a true vector.
According to the vector addition theorem the projected area of two plane
surfaces, joined together at a line, in the x direction (say) is the xcomponent
of the sum of the vector areas. Likewise, for many joined up plane areas the
projected area in the xdirection, which is the same as the projected area of the
rim in the xdirection, is the xcomponent of the resultant of all the vector areas:
S =
i
S
i
. (2.10)
If we approach a limit, by letting the number of plane facets increase and their
area reduce, then we obtain a continuous surface denoted by the resultant vector
area:
S =
i
δS
i
. (2.11)
It is clear that the projected area of the rim in the xdirection is just S
x
. Note
that the rim of the surface determines the vector area rather than the nature
of the surface. So, two diﬀerent surfaces sharing the same rim both possess the
same vector areas.
In conclusion, a loop (not all in one plane) has a vector area S which is the
resultant of the vector areas of any surface ending on the loop. The components
of S are the projected areas of the loop in the directions of the basis vectors. As
a corollary, a closed surface has S = 0 since it does not possess a rim.
9
2.3 The scalar product
A scalar quantity is invariant under all possible rotational transformations. The
individual components of a vector are not scalars because they change under
transformation. Can we form a scalar out of some combination of the components
of one, or more, vectors? Suppose that we were to deﬁne the “ampersand” product
a&b = a
x
b
y
+a
y
b
z
+a
z
b
x
= scalar number (2.12)
for general vectors a and b. Is a&b invariant under transformation, as must be
the case if it is a scalar number? Let us consider an example. Suppose that
a = (1, 0, 0) and b = (0, 1, 0). It is easily seen that a&b = 1. Let us now rotate
the basis through 45
◦
about the zaxis. In the new basis, a = (1/
√
2, −1/
√
2, 0)
and b = (1/
√
2, 1/
√
2, 0), giving a&b = 1/2. Clearly, a&b is not invariant under
rotational transformation, so the above deﬁnition is a bad one.
Consider, now, the dot product or scalar product:
a · b = a
x
b
x
+a
y
b
y
+a
z
b
z
= scalar number. (2.13)
Let us rotate the basis though θ degrees about the zaxis. According to Eq. (2.8),
in the new basis a · b takes the form
a · b = (a
x
cos θ +a
y
sinθ)(b
x
cos θ +b
y
sinθ)
+(−a
x
sinθ +a
y
cos θ)(−b
x
sinθ +b
y
cos θ) +a
z
b
z
(2.14)
= a
x
b
x
+a
y
b
y
+a
z
b
z
.
Thus, a · b is invariant under rotation about the zaxis. It can easily be shown
that it is also invariant under rotation about the x and yaxes. Clearly, a · b
is a true scalar, so the above deﬁnition is a good one. Incidentally, a · b is the
only simple combination of the components of two vectors which transforms like
a scalar. It is easily shown that the dot product is commutative and distributive:
a · b = b · a,
a · (b +c) = a · b +a · c. (2.15)
The associative property is meaningless for the dot product because we cannot
have (a · b) · c since a · b is scalar.
10
We have shown that the dot product a · b is coordinate independent. But
what is the physical signiﬁcance of this? Consider the special case where a = b.
Clearly,
a · b = a
2
x
+a
2
y
+a
2
z
= Length (OP)
2
, (2.16)
if a is the position vector of P relative to the origin O. So, the invariance of
a· a is equivalent to the invariance of the length, or magnitude, of vector a under
transformation. The length of vector a is usually denoted a (“the modulus of
a”) or sometimes just a, so
a · a = a
2
= a
2
. (2.17)
θ
a
b
ba
O
A
B
Let us now investigate the general case. The length squared of AB is
(b −a) · (b −a) = a
2
+b
2
−2 a · b. (2.18)
However, according to the “cosine rule” of trigonometry
(AB)
2
= (OA)
2
+ (OB)
2
−2(OA)(OB) cos θ, (2.19)
where (AB) denotes the length of side AB. It follows that
a · b = ab cos θ. (2.20)
Clearly, the invariance of a·b under transformation is equivalent to the invariance
of the angle subtended between the two vectors. Note that if a· b = 0 then either
11
a = 0, b = 0, or the vectors a and b are perpendicular. The angle subtended
between two vectors can easily be obtained from the dot product:
cos θ =
a · b
ab
. (2.21)
The work W performed by a force F moving through a displacement r is the
product of the magnitude of F times the displacement in the direction of F. If
the angle subtended between F and r is θ then
W = F(r cos θ) = F · r. (2.22)
The rate of ﬂow of liquid of constant velocity v through a loop of vector area S
is the product of the magnitude of the area times the component of the velocity
perpendicular to the loop. Thus,
Rate of ﬂow = v · S. (2.23)
2.4 The vector product
We have discovered how to construct a scalar from the components of two gen
eral vectors a and b. Can we also construct a vector which is not just a linear
combination of a and b? Consider the following deﬁnition:
axb = (a
x
b
x
, a
y
b
y
, a
z
b
z
). (2.24)
Is axb a proper vector? Suppose that a = (1, 0, 0), b = (0, 1, 0). Clearly,
axb = 0. However, if we rotate the basis through 45
◦
about the zaxis then
a = (1/
√
2, −1/
√
2, 0), b = (1/
√
2, 1/
√
2, 0), and axb = (1/2, −1/2, 0). Thus,
axb does not transform like a vector because its magnitude depends on the choice
of axis. So, above deﬁnition is a bad one.
Consider, now, the cross product or vector product:
a ∧ b = (a
y
b
z
−a
z
b
y
, a
z
b
x
−a
x
b
z
, a
x
b
y
−a
y
b
x
) = c. (2.25)
12
Does this rather unlikely combination transform like a vector? Let us try rotating
the basis through θ degrees about the zaxis using Eq. (2.8). In the new basis
c
x
= (−a
x
sinθ +a
y
cos θ)b
z
−a
z
(−b
x
sinθ +b
y
cos θ)
= (a
y
b
z
−a
z
b
y
) cos θ + (a
z
b
x
−a
x
b
z
) sinθ
= c
x
cos θ +c
y
sinθ. (2.26)
Thus, the xcomponent of a∧b transforms correctly. It can easily be shown that
the other components transform correctly as well. Thus, a∧b is a proper vector.
The cross product is anticommutative:
a ∧ b = −b ∧ a, (2.27)
distributive:
a ∧ (b +c) = a ∧ b +a ∧ c, (2.28)
but is not associative:
a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a ∧ b) ∧ c. (2.29)
The cross product transforms like a vector, which means that it must have a
well deﬁned direction and magnitude. We can show that a ∧ b is perpendicular
to both a and b. Consider a · a ∧ b. If this is zero then the cross product must
be perpendicular to a. Now
a · a ∧ b = a
x
(a
y
b
z
−a
z
b
y
) +a
y
(a
z
b
x
−a
x
b
z
) +a
z
(a
x
b
y
−a
y
b
x
)
= 0. (2.30)
Therefore, a ∧ b is perpendicular to a. Likewise, it can be demonstrated that
a ∧ b is perpendicular to b. The vectors a, b, and a ∧ b form a righthanded set
like the unit vectors i, j, and k: i ∧ j = k. This deﬁnes a unique direction for
a ∧ b, which is obtained from the righthand rule.
Let us now evaluate the magnitude of a ∧ b. We have
(a ∧ b)
2
= (a
y
b
z
−a
z
b
y
)
2
+ (a
z
b
x
−a
x
b
z
)
2
+ (a
x
b
z
−a
y
b
x
)
2
= (a
2
x
+a
2
y
+a
2
z
)(b
2
x
+b
2
y
+b
2
z
) −(a
x
b
x
+a
y
b
y
+a
z
b
z
)
2
= a
2
b
2
−(a · b)
2
= a
2
b
2
−a
2
b
2
cos
2
θ = a
2
b
2
sin
2
θ. (2.31)
13
θ
a
^
b
b
a index finger
middle finger
thumb
Thus,
a ∧ b = ab sinθ. (2.32)
Clearly, a ∧ a = 0 for any vector, since θ is always zero in this case. Also, if
a ∧ b = 0 then either a = 0, b = 0, or b is parallel (or antiparallel) to a.
Consider the parallelogram deﬁned by vectors a and b. The scalar area is
ab sinθ. The vector area has the magnitude of the scalar area and is normal to
the plane of the parallelogram, which means that it is perpendicular to both a
and b. Clearly, the vector area is given by
b
a
θ
S = a ∧ b, (2.33)
with the sense obtained from the righthand grip rule by rotating a on to b.
Suppose that a force F is applied at position r. The moment about the origin
O is the product of the magnitude of the force and the length of the lever arm OQ.
Thus, the magnitude of the moment is Fr sinθ. The direction of a moment
is conventionally the direction of the axis through O about which the force tries
14
O Q
r
P
θ
F
r sinθ
to rotate objects, in the sense determined by the righthand grip rule. It follows
that the vector moment is given by
M = r ∧ F. (2.34)
2.5 Rotation
Let us try to deﬁne a rotation vector θ whose magnitude is the angle of the
rotation, θ, and whose direction is the axis of the rotation, in the sense determined
by the righthand grip rule. Is this a good vector? The short answer is, no.
The problem is that the addition of rotations is not commutative, whereas vector
addition is. The diagram shows the eﬀect of applying two successive 90
◦
rotations,
one about xaxis, and the other about the zaxis, to a sixsided die. In the
lefthand case the zrotation is applied before the xrotation, and vice versa in
the righthand case. It can be seen that the die ends up in two completely
diﬀerent states. Clearly, the zrotation plus the xrotation does not equal the x
rotation plus the zrotation. This noncommuting algebra cannot be represented
by vectors. So, although rotations have a well deﬁned magnitude and direction
they are not vector quantities.
But, this is not quite the end of the story. Suppose that we take a general
15
zaxis xaxis
xaxis zaxis
y
z
x
vector a and rotate it about the zaxis by a small angle δθ
z
. This is equivalent
to rotating the basis about the zaxis by −δθ
z
. According to Eq. (2.8) we have
a
a +δθ
z
k ∧ a, (2.35)
where use has been made of the small angle expansions sinθ θ and cos θ 1.
The above equation can easily be generalized to allow small rotations about the
x and yaxes by δθ
x
and δθ
y
, respectively. We ﬁnd that
a
a +δθ ∧ a, (2.36)
16
where
δθ = δθ
x
i +δθ
y
j +δθ
z
k. (2.37)
Clearly, we can deﬁne a rotation vector δθ, but it only works for small angle
rotations (i.e., suﬃciently small that the small angle expansions of sine and cosine
are good). According to the above equation, a small zrotation plus a small x
rotation is (approximately) equal to the two rotations applied in the opposite
order. The fact that inﬁnitesimal rotation is a vector implies that angular velocity,
ω = lim
δt→0
δθ
δt
, (2.38)
must be a vector as well. If a
is interpreted as a(t + δt) in the above equation
then it is clear that the equation of motion of a vector precessing about the origin
with angular velocity ω is
da
dt
= ω ∧ a. (2.39)
2.6 The scalar triple product
Consider three vectors a, b, and c. The scalar triple product is deﬁned a · b ∧ c.
Now, b∧c is the vector area of the parallelogram deﬁned by b and c. So, a· b∧c
is the scalar area of this parallelogram times the component of a in the direction
of its normal. It follows that a · b ∧ c is the volume of the parallelepiped deﬁned
by vectors a, b, and c. This volume is independent of how the triple product is
b
a
c
formed from a, b, and c, except that
a · b ∧ c = −a · c ∧ b. (2.40)
17
So, the “volume” is positive if a, b, and c form a righthanded set (i.e., if a lies
above the plane of b and c, in the sense determined from the righthand grip rule
by rotating b on to c) and negative if they form a lefthanded set. The triple
product is unchanged if the dot and cross product operators are interchanged:
a · b ∧ c = a ∧ b · c. (2.41)
The triple product is also invariant under any cyclic permutation of a, b, and c,
a · b ∧ c = b · c ∧ a = c · a ∧ b, (2.42)
but any anticyclic permutation causes it to change sign,
a · b ∧ c = −b · a ∧ c. (2.43)
The scalar triple product is zero if any two of a, b, and c are parallel, or if a, b,
and c are coplanar.
If a, b, and c are noncoplanar, then any vector r can be written in terms of
them:
r = αa +βb +γc. (2.44)
Forming the dot product of this equation with b ∧ c then we obtain
r · b ∧ c = αa · b ∧ c, (2.45)
so
α =
r · b ∧ c
a · b ∧ c
. (2.46)
Analogous expressions can be written for β and γ. The parameters α, β, and γ
are uniquely determined provided a· b ∧c = 0; i.e., provided that the three basis
vectors are not coplanar.
2.7 The vector triple product
For three vectors a, b, and c the vector triple product is deﬁned a ∧ (b ∧ c).
The brackets are important because a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a ∧ b) ∧ c. In fact, it can be
demonstrated that
a ∧ (b ∧ c) ≡ (a · c)b −(a · b)c (2.47)
18
and
(a ∧ b) ∧ c ≡ (a · c)b −(b · c)a. (2.48)
Let us try to prove the ﬁrst of the above theorems. The lefthand side and
the righthand side are both proper vectors, so if we can prove this result in
one particular coordinate system then it must be true in general. Let us take
convenient axes such that the xaxis lies along b, and c lies in the xy plane. It
follows that b = (b
x
, 0, 0), c = (c
x
, c
y
, 0), and a = (a
x
, a
y
, a
z
). The vector b ∧ c
is directed along the zaxis: b ∧ c = (0, 0, b
x
c
y
). It follows that a ∧ (b ∧ c) lies
in the xy plane: a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a
x
b
x
c
y
, −a
x
b
x
c
y
, 0). This is the lefthand side
of Eq. (2.47) in our convenient axes. To evaluate the righthand side we need
a · c = a
x
c
x
+a
y
c
y
and a · b = a
x
b
x
. It follows that the righthand side is
RHS = ( (a
x
c
x
+a
y
c
y
)b
x
, 0, 0) −(a
x
b
x
c
x
, a
x
b
x
c
y
, 0)
= (a
y
c
y
b
x
, −a
x
b
x
c
y
, 0) = LHS, (2.49)
which proves the theorem.
2.8 Vector calculus
Suppose that vector a varies with time, so that a = a(t). The time derivative of
the vector is deﬁned
da
dt
= lim
δt→0
_
a(t +δt) −a(t)
δt
_
. (2.50)
When written out in component form this becomes
da
dt
=
_
da
x
dt
,
da
y
dt
,
da
z
dt
_
. (2.51)
Note that da/dt is often written in shorthand as ˙ a.
Suppose that a is, in fact, the product of a scalar φ(t) and another vector
b(t). What now is the time derivative of a? We have
da
x
dt
=
d
dt
(φb
x
) =
dφ
dt
b
x
+φ
db
x
dt
, (2.52)
19
which implies that
da
dt
=
dφ
dt
b +φ
db
dt
. (2.53)
It is easily demonstrated that
d
dt
(a · b) = ˙ a · b +a ·
˙
b. (2.54)
Likewise,
d
dt
(a ∧ b) = ˙ a ∧ b +a ∧
˙
b. (2.55)
It can be seen that the laws of vector diﬀerentiation are analogous to those in
conventional calculus.
2.9 Line integrals
Consider a twodimensional function f(x, y) which is deﬁned for all x and y.
What is meant by the integral of f along a given curve from P to Q in the xy
P
Q
y
x
l
Q P
l
f
plane? We ﬁrst draw out f as a function of length l along the path. The integral
is then simply given by
_
Q
P
f(x, y) dl = Area under the curve. (2.56)
20
As an example of this, consider the integral of f(x, y) = xy between P and Q
along the two routes indicated in the diagram below. Along route 1 we have
Q = (1,1)
P = (0,0) 2
1
x
y
x = y, so dl =
√
2 dx. Thus,
_
Q
P
xy dl =
_
1
0
x
2
√
2 dx =
√
2
3
. (2.57)
The integration along route 2 gives
_
Q
P
xy dl =
_
1
0
xy dx
¸
¸
¸
¸
y=0
+
_
1
0
xy dy
¸
¸
¸
¸
x=1
= 0 +
_
1
0
y dy =
1
2
. (2.58)
Note that the integral depends on the route taken between the initial and ﬁnal
points.
The most common type of line integral is where the contributions from dx
and dy are evaluated separately, rather that through the path length dl;
_
Q
P
[f(x, y) dx +g(x, y) dy] . (2.59)
As an example of this consider the integral
_
Q
P
_
y
3
dx +xdy
¸
(2.60)
21
2
1
y
x
Q = (2,1)
P = (1,0)
along the two routes indicated in the diagram below. Along route 1 we have
x = y + 1 and dx = dy, so
_
Q
P
=
_
1
0
_
y
3
dy + (y + 1) dy
_
=
7
4
. (2.61)
Along route 2
_
Q
P
=
_
2
1
y
3
dx
¸
¸
¸
¸
y=0
+
_
1
0
xdy
¸
¸
¸
¸
x=2
= 2. (2.62)
Again, the integral depends on the path of integration.
Suppose that we have a line integral which does not depend on the path of
integration. It follows that
_
Q
P
(f dx +g dy) = F(Q) −F(P) (2.63)
for some function F. Given F(P) for one point P in the xy plane, then
F(Q) = F(P) +
_
Q
P
(f dx +g dy) (2.64)
deﬁnes F(Q) for all other points in the plane. We can then draw a contour map
of F(x, y). The line integral between points P and Q is simply the change in
height in the contour map between these two points:
_
Q
P
(f dx +g dy) =
_
Q
P
dF(x, y) = F(Q) −F(P). (2.65)
22
Thus,
dF(x, y) = f(x, y) dx +g(x, y) dy. (2.66)
For instance, if F = xy
3
then dF = y
3
dx + 3xy
2
dy and
_
Q
P
_
y
3
dx + 3xy
2
dy
_
=
_
xy
3
¸
Q
P
(2.67)
is independent of the path of integration.
It is clear that there are two distinct types of line integral. Those that depend
only on their endpoints and not on the path of integration, and those which
depend both on their endpoints and the integration path. Later on, we shall
learn how to distinguish between these two types.
2.10 Vector line integrals
A vector ﬁeld is deﬁned as a set of vectors associated with each point in space.
For instance, the velocity v(r) in a moving liquid (e.g., a whirlpool) constitutes
a vector ﬁeld. By analogy, a scalar ﬁeld is a set of scalars associated with each
point in space. An example of a scalar ﬁeld is the temperature distribution T(r)
in a furnace.
Consider a general vector ﬁeld A(r). Let dl = (dx, dy, dz) be the vector
element of line length. Vector line integrals often arise as
_
Q
P
A· dl =
_
Q
P
(A
x
dx +A
y
dy +A
z
dz). (2.68)
For instance, if A is a force then the line integral is the work done in going from
P to Q.
As an example, consider the work done in a repulsive, inverse square law,
central ﬁeld F = −r/r
3
. The element of work done is dW = F · dl. Take
P = (∞, 0, 0) and Q = (a, 0, 0). Route 1 is along the xaxis, so
W =
_
a
∞
_
−
1
x
2
_
dx =
_
1
x
_
a
∞
=
1
a
. (2.69)
23
The second route is, ﬁrstly, around a large circle (r = constant) to the point (a,
∞, 0) and then parallel to the yaxis. In the ﬁrst part no work is done since F is
perpendicular to dl. In the second part
W =
_
0
∞
−y dy
(a
2
+y
2
)
3/2
=
_
1
(y
2
+a
2
)
1/2
_
∞
0
=
1
a
. (2.70)
In this case the integral is independent of path (which is just as well!).
2.11 Surface integrals
Let us take a surface S, which is not necessarily coplanar, and divide in up into
(scalar) elements δS
i
. Then
_ _
S
f(x, y, z) dS = lim
δS
i
→0
i
f(x, y, z) δS
i
(2.71)
is a surface integral. For instance, the volume of water in a lake of depth D(x, y)
is
V =
_ _
D(x, y) dS. (2.72)
To evaluate this integral we must split the calculation into two ordinary integrals.
x x x
y
y
y
dy
1 2
1
2
24
The volume in the strip shown in the diagram is
__
x
2
x
1
D(x, y) dx
_
dy. (2.73)
Note that the limits x
1
and x
2
depend on y. The total volume is the sum over
all strips:
V =
_
y
2
y
1
dy
_
_
x
2
(y)
x
1
(y)
D(x, y) dx
_
≡
_ _
S
D(x, y) dxdy. (2.74)
Of course, the integral can be evaluated by taking the strips the other way around:
V =
_
x
2
x
1
dx
_
y
2
(x)
y
1
(x)
D(x, y) dy. (2.75)
Interchanging the order of integration is a very powerful and useful trick. But
great care must be taken when evaluating the limits.
As an example, consider
_ _
S
x
2
y dxdy, (2.76)
where S is shown in the diagram below. Suppose that we evaluate the x integral
1y = x
(0,1)
(1,0)
y
x
ﬁrst:
dy
__
1−y
0
x
2
y dx
_
= y dy
_
x
3
3
_
1−y
0
=
y
3
(1 −y)
3
dy. (2.77)
25
Let us now evaluate the y integral:
_
1
0
_
y
3
−y
2
+y
3
−
y
4
3
_
dy =
1
60
. (2.78)
We can also evaluate the integral by interchanging the order of integration:
_
1
0
x
2
dx
_
1−x
0
y dy =
_
1
0
x
2
2
(1 −x)
2
dx =
1
60
. (2.79)
In some cases a surface integral is just the product of two separate integrals.
For instance,
_ _
S
x
2
y dxdy (2.80)
where S is a unit square. This integral can be written
_
1
0
dx
_
1
0
x
2
y dy =
__
1
0
x
2
dx
___
1
0
y dy
_
=
1
3
1
2
=
1
6
, (2.81)
since the limits are both independent of the other variable.
In general, when interchanging the order of integration the most important
part of the whole problem is getting the limits of integration right. The only
foolproof way of doing this is to draw a diagram.
2.12 Vector surface integrals
Surface integrals often occur during vector analysis. For instance, the rate of ﬂow
of a liquid of velocity v through an inﬁnitesimal surface of vector area dS is v·dS.
The net rate of ﬂow of a surface S made up of lots of inﬁnitesimal surfaces is
_ _
S
v · dS = lim
dS→0
_
v cos θ dS
_
, (2.82)
where θ is the angle subtended between the normal to the surface and the ﬂow
velocity.
26
As with line integrals, most surface integrals depend both on the surface and
the rim. But some (very important) integrals depend only on the rim, and not
on the nature of the surface which spans it. As an example of this, consider
incompressible ﬂuid ﬂow between two surfaces S
1
and S
2
which end on the same
rim. The volume between the surfaces is constant, so what goes in must come
out, and
_ _
S
1
v · dS =
_ _
S
2
v · dS. (2.83)
It follows that
_ _
v · dS (2.84)
depends only on the rim, and not on the form of surfaces S
1
and S
2
.
2.13 Volume integrals
A volume integral takes the form
_ _ _
V
f(x, y, z) dV (2.85)
where V is some volume and dV = dxdy dz is a small volume element. The
volume element is sometimes written d
3
r, or even dτ. As an example of a volume
integral, let us evaluate the centre of gravity of a solid hemisphere of radius a.
The height of the centre of gravity is given by
y
x
z
27
z =
_ _ _
z dV
__ _ _
dV. (2.86)
The bottom integral is simply the volume of the hemisphere, which is 2πa
3
/3.
The top integral is most easily evaluated in spherical polar coordinates, for which
z = r cos θ and dV = r
2
sinθ dr dθ dφ. Thus,
_ _ _
z dV =
_
a
0
dr
_
π/2
0
dθ
_
2π
0
dφ r cos θ r
2
sinθ
=
_
a
0
r
3
dr
_
π/2
0
sinθ cos θ dθ
_
2π
0
dφ =
πa
4
4
, (2.87)
giving
z =
πa
4
4
3
2πa
3
=
3a
8
. (2.88)
2.14 Gradient
A onedimensional function f(x) has a gradient df/dx which is deﬁned as the
slope of the tangent to the curve at x. We wish to extend this idea to cover scalar
x
f(x)
ﬁelds in two and three dimensions.
Consider a twodimensional scalar ﬁeld h(x, y) which is (say) the height of
a hill. Let dl = (dx, dy) be an element of horizontal distance. Consider dh/dl,
28
where dh is the change in height after moving an inﬁnitesimal distance dl. This
quantity is somewhat like the onedimensional gradient, except that dh depends
on the direction of dl, as well as its magnitude. In the immediate vicinity of some
θ
y
x
Contours of h(x,y)
P
point P the slope reduces to an inclined plane. The largest value of dh/dl is
straight up the slope. For any other direction
dh
dl
=
_
dh
dl
_
max
cos θ. (2.89)
Let us deﬁne a twodimensional vector gradh, called the gradient of h, whose
magnitude is (dh/dl)
max
and whose direction is the direction of the steepest slope.
Because of the cos θ property, the component of gradh in any direction equals
dh/dl for that direction. [The argument, here, is analogous to that used for vector
areas in Section 2.2. See, in particular, Eq. (2.9). ]
The component of dh/dl in the xdirection can be obtained by plotting out the
proﬁle of h at constant y, and then ﬁnding the slope of the tangent to the curve
at given x. This quantity is known as the partial derivative of h with respect to
x at constant y, and is denoted (∂h/∂x)
y
. Likewise, the gradient of the proﬁle
at constant x is written (∂h/∂y)
x
. Note that the subscripts denoting constantx
and constanty are usually omitted, unless there is any ambiguity. If follows that
in component form
gradh =
_
∂h
∂x
,
∂h
∂y
_
. (2.90)
29
Now, the equation of the tangent plane at P = (x
0
, y
0
) is
h
T
(x, y) = h(x
0
, y
0
) +α(x −x
0
) +β(y −y
0
). (2.91)
This has the same local gradients as h(x, y), so
α =
∂h
∂x
, β =
∂h
∂y
(2.92)
by diﬀerentiation of the above. For small dx = x−x
0
and dy = y−y
0
the function
h is coincident with the tangent plane. We have
dh =
∂h
∂x
dx +
∂h
∂y
dy, (2.93)
but gradh = (∂h/∂x, ∂h/∂y) and dl = (dx, dy), so
dh = gradh · dl. (2.94)
Incidentally, the above equation demonstrates that gradh is a proper vector,
since the lefthand side is a scalar and, according to the properties of the dot
product, the righthand side is also a scalar provided that dl and gradh are
both proper vectors (dl is an obvious vector because it is directly derived from
displacements).
Consider, now, a threedimensional temperature distribution T(x, y, z) in (say)
a reaction vessel. Let us deﬁne gradT, as before, as a vector whose magnitude is
(dT/dl)
max
and whose direction is the direction of the maximum gradient. This
vector is written in component form
gradT =
_
∂T
∂x
,
∂T
∂y
,
∂T
∂z
_
. (2.95)
Here, ∂T/∂x ≡ (∂T/∂x)
y,z
is the gradient of the onedimensional temperature
proﬁle at constant y and z. The change in T in going from point P to a neigh
bouring point oﬀset by dl = (dx, dy, dz) is
dT =
∂T
∂x
dx +
∂T
∂y
dy +
∂T
∂z
dz. (2.96)
30
In vector form this becomes
dT = gradT · dl. (2.97)
Suppose that dT = 0 for some dl. It follows that
dT = gradT · dl = 0, (2.98)
so dl is perpendicular to gradT. Since dT = 0 along socalled “isotherms”
(i.e., contours of the temperature) we conclude that the isotherms (contours) are
everywhere perpendicular to gradT.
dl
gradT
isotherm
T = constant
It is, of course, possible to integrate dT. The line integral from point P to
point Q is written
_
Q
P
dT =
_
Q
P
gradT · dl = T(Q) −T(P). (2.99)
This integral is clearly independent of the path taken between P and Q, so
_
Q
P
gradT · dl must be path independent.
In general,
_
Q
P
A· dl depends on path, but for some special vector ﬁelds the
integral is path independent. Such ﬁelds are called conservative ﬁelds. It can be
shown that if A is a conservative ﬁeld then A = gradφ for some scalar ﬁeld φ.
The proof of this is straightforward. Keeping P ﬁxed we have
_
Q
P
A· dl = V (Q), (2.100)
31
where V (Q) is a welldeﬁned function due to the path independent nature of the
line integral. Consider moving the position of the end point by an inﬁnitesimal
amount dx in the xdirection. We have
V (Q+dx) = V (Q) +
_
Q+dx
Q
A· dl = V (Q) +A
x
dx. (2.101)
Hence,
∂V
∂x
= A
x
, (2.102)
with analogous relations for the other components of A. It follows that
A = gradV. (2.103)
In physics, the force due to gravity is a good example of a conservative ﬁeld.
If A is a force, then
_
A· dl is the work done in traversing some path. If A is
conservative then
_
A· dl = 0, (2.104)
where
_
corresponds to the line integral around some closed loop. The fact
that zero net work is done in going around a closed loop is equivalent to the
conservation of energy (this is why conservative ﬁelds are called “conservative”).
A good example of a nonconservative ﬁeld is the force due to friction. Clearly, a
frictional system loses energy in going around a closed cycle, so
_
A· dl = 0.
It is useful to deﬁne the vector operator
∇ ≡
_
∂
∂x
,
∂
∂y
,
∂
∂z
_
, (2.105)
which is usually called the “grad” or “del” operator. This operator acts on
everything to its right in a expression until the end of the expression or a closing
bracket is reached. For instance,
gradf = ∇f =
_
∂f
∂x
,
∂f
∂y
,
∂f
∂x
_
. (2.106)
32
For two scalar ﬁelds φ and ψ,
grad(φψ) = φgradψ +ψ gradφ (2.107)
can be written more succinctly as
∇(φψ) = φ∇ψ +ψ∇φ. (2.108)
Suppose that we rotate the basis about the zaxis by θ degrees. By analogy
with Eq. (2.7), the old coordinates (x, y, z) are related to the new ones (x
, y
,
z
) via
x = x
cos θ −y
sinθ,
y = x
sinθ +y
cos θ, (2.109)
z = z
.
Now,
∂
∂x
=
_
∂x
∂x
_
y
,z
∂
∂x
+
_
∂y
∂x
_
y
,z
∂
∂y
+
_
∂z
∂x
_
y
,z
∂
∂z
, (2.110)
giving
∂
∂x
= cos θ
∂
∂x
+ sinθ
∂
∂y
, (2.111)
and
∇
x
= cos θ ∇
x
+ sinθ ∇
y
. (2.112)
It can be seen that the diﬀerential operator ∇ transforms like a proper vector,
according to Eq. (2.8). This is another proof that ∇f is a good vector.
2.15 Divergence
Let us start with a vector ﬁeld A. Consider
_
S
A· dS over some closed surface
S, where dS denotes an outward pointing surface element. This surface integral
33
is usually called the ﬂux of A out of S. If A is the velocity of some ﬂuid, then
_
S
A· dS is the rate of ﬂow of material out of S.
If A is constant in space then it is easily demonstrated that the net ﬂux out
of S is zero:
_
A· dS = A·
_
dS = A· S = 0, (2.113)
since the vector area S of a closed surface is zero.
Suppose, now, that A is not uniform in space. Consider a very small rectan
gular volume over which A hardly varies. The contribution to
_
A· dS from the
two faces normal to the xaxis is
A
x
(x +dx) dy dz −A
x
(x) dy dz =
∂A
x
∂x
dxdy dz =
∂A
x
∂x
dV, (2.114)
where dV = dxdy dz is the volume element. There are analogous contributions
x
z
y
x x+dx
z+dz
z
y+dy
y
from the sides normal to the y and zaxes, so the total of all the contributions is
_
A· dS =
_
∂A
x
∂x
+
∂A
y
∂y
+
∂A
z
∂z
_
dV. (2.115)
The divergence of a vector ﬁeld is deﬁned
div A = ∇· A =
∂A
x
∂x
+
∂A
y
∂y
+
∂A
z
∂z
. (2.116)
34
Divergence is a good scalar (i.e., it is coordinate independent), since it is the dot
product of the vector operator ∇ with A. The formal deﬁnition of div A is
div A = lim
dV →0
_
A· dS
dV
. (2.117)
This deﬁnition is independent of the shape of the inﬁnitesimal volume element.
One of the most important results in vector ﬁeld theory is the socalled diver
gence theorem or Gauss’ theorem. This states that for any volume V surrounded
by a closed surface S,
_
S
A· dS =
_
V
div AdV, (2.118)
where dS is an outward pointing volume element. The proof is very straightfor
S
ward. We divide up the volume into lots of very small cubes and sum
_
A· dS
over all of the surfaces. The contributions from the interior surfaces cancel out,
leaving just the contribution from the outer surface. We can use Eq. (2.115)
for each cube individually. This tells us that the summation is equivalent to
_
div AdV over the whole volume. Thus, the integral of A· dS over the outer
surface is equal to the integral of div A over the whole volume, which proves the
divergence theorem.
Now, for a vector ﬁeld with div A = 0,
_
S
A· dS = 0 (2.119)
35
for any closed surface S. So, for two surfaces on the same rim,
_
S
1
A· dS =
_
S
2
A· dS. (2.120)
Thus, if div A = 0 then the surface integral depends on the rim but not the
nature of the surface which spans it. On the other hand, if div A = 0 then the
integral depends on both the rim and the surface.
RIM
S
S
2
1
Consider an incompressible ﬂuid whose velocity ﬁeld is v. It is clear that
_
v · dS = 0 for any closed surface, since what ﬂows into the surface must ﬂow
out again. Thus, according to the divergence theorem,
_
div v dV = 0 for any
volume. The only way in which this is possible is if div v is everywhere zero.
Thus, the velocity components of an incompressible ﬂuid satisfy the following
diﬀerential relation:
∂v
x
∂x
+
∂v
y
∂y
+
∂v
z
∂z
= 0. (2.121)
Consider, now, a compressible ﬂuid of density ρ and velocity v. The surface
integral
_
S
ρv · dS is the net rate of mass ﬂow out of the closed surface S. This
must be equal to the rate of decrease of mass inside the volume V enclosed by S,
which is written −(∂/∂t)(
_
V
ρ dV ). Thus,
_
S
ρv · dS = −
∂
∂t
__
V
ρ dV
_
(2.122)
36
for any volume. It follows from the divergence theorem that
div(ρv) = −
∂ρ
∂t
. (2.123)
This is called the equation of continuity of the ﬂuid, since it ensures that ﬂuid is
neither created nor destroyed as it ﬂows from place to place. If ρ is constant then
the equation of continuity reduces to the previous incompressible result div v = 0.
It is sometimes helpful to represent a vector ﬁeld A by “lines of force” or
“ﬁeld lines.” The direction of a line of force at any point is the same as the
direction of A. The density of lines (i.e., the number of lines crossing a unit
surface perpendicular to A) is equal to A. In the diagram, A is larger at point
1 2
1 than at point 2. The number of lines crossing a surface element dS is A· dS.
So, the net number of lines leaving a closed surface is
_
S
A· dS =
_
V
div AdV. (2.124)
If div A = 0 then there is no net ﬂux of lines out of any surface, which mean that
the lines of force must form closed loops. Such a ﬁeld is called a solenoidal vector
ﬁeld.
37
2.16 The Laplacian
So far we have encountered
gradφ =
_
∂φ
∂x
,
∂φ
∂y
,
∂φ
∂z
_
, (2.125)
which is a vector ﬁeld formed from a scalar ﬁeld, and
div A =
∂A
x
∂x
+
∂A
y
∂y
+
∂A
z
∂z
, (2.126)
which is a scalar ﬁeld formed from a vector ﬁeld. There are two ways in which
we can combine grad and div. We can either form the vector ﬁeld grad(div A)
or the scalar ﬁeld div(gradφ). The former is not particularly interesting, but
the scalar ﬁeld div(gradφ) turns up in a great many physics problems and is,
therefore, worthy of discussion.
Let us introduce the heat ﬂow vector h which is the rate of ﬂow of heat
energy per unit area across a surface perpendicular to the direction of h. In
many substances heat ﬂows directly down the temperature gradient, so that we
can write
h = −κgradT, (2.127)
where κ is the thermal conductivity. The net rate of heat ﬂow
_
S
h · dS out of
some closed surface S must be equal to the rate of decrease of heat energy in the
volume V enclosed by S. Thus, we can write
_
S
h · dS = −
∂
∂t
__
c T dV
_
, (2.128)
where c is the speciﬁc heat. It follows from the divergence theorem that
div h = −c
∂T
∂t
. (2.129)
Taking the divergence of both sides of Eq. (2.127), and making use of Eq. (2.129),
we obtain
div (κgradT) = c
∂T
∂t
, (2.130)
38
or
∇· (κ∇T) = c
∂T
∂t
. (2.131)
If κ is constant then the above equation can be written
div(gradT) =
c
κ
∂T
∂t
. (2.132)
The scalar ﬁeld div(gradT) takes the form
div(gradT) =
∂
∂x
_
∂T
∂x
_
+
∂
∂y
_
∂T
∂y
_
+
∂
∂z
_
∂T
∂z
_
=
∂
2
T
∂x
2
+
∂
2
T
∂y
2
+
∂
2
T
∂z
2
≡ ∇
2
T. (2.133)
Here, the scalar diﬀerential operator
∇
2
≡
_
∂
2
∂x
2
+
∂
2
∂y
2
+
∂
2
∂z
2
_
(2.134)
is called the Laplacian. The Laplacian is a good scalar operator (i.e., it is coordi
nate independent) because it is formed from a combination of div (another good
scalar operator) and grad (a good vector operator).
What is the physical signiﬁcance of the Laplacian? In onedimension ∇
2
T
reduces to ∂
2
T/∂x
2
. Now, ∂
2
T/∂x
2
is positive if T(x) is concave (from above)
 
+ +
T
x
39
and negative if it is convex. So, if T is less than the average of T in its surroundings
then ∇
2
T is positive, and vice versa.
In two dimensions
∇
2
T =
∂
2
T
∂x
2
+
∂
2
T
∂y
2
. (2.135)
Consider a local minimum of the temperature. At the minimum the slope of T
increases in all directions so ∇
2
T is positive. Likewise, ∇
2
T is negative at a local
maximum. Consider, now, a steepsided valley in T. Suppose that the bottom
of the valley runs parallel to the xaxis. At the bottom of the valley ∂
2
T/∂y
2
is
large and positive, whereas ∂
2
T/∂x
2
is small and may even be negative. Thus,
∇
2
T is positive, and this is associated with T being less than the average local
value T.
Let us now return to the heat conduction problem:
∇
2
T =
c
κ
∂T
∂t
. (2.136)
It is clear that if ∇
2
T is positive then T is locally less than the average value, so
∂T/∂t > 0; i.e., the region heats up. Likewise, if ∇
2
T is negative then T is locally
greater than the average value and heat ﬂows out of the region; i.e., ∂T/∂t < 0.
Thus, the above heat conduction equation makes physical sense.
2.17 Curl
Consider a vector ﬁeld A and a loop which lies in one plane. The integral of A
around this loop is written
_
A · dl, where dl is a line element of the loop. If
A is a conservative ﬁeld then A = gradφ and
_
A· dl = 0 for all loops. For a
nonconservative ﬁeld
_
A· dl = 0, in general.
For a small loop we expect
_
A· dl to be proportional to the area of the loop.
Moreover, for a ﬁxed area loop we expect
_
A· dl to depend on the orientation of
the loop. One particular orientation will give the maximum value:
_
A·dl = I
max
.
If the loop subtends an angle θ with this optimum orientation then we expect
40
I = I
max
cos θ. Let us introduce the vector ﬁeld curl A whose magnitude is
curl A = lim
dS→0
_
A· dl
dS
(2.137)
for the orientation giving I
max
. Here, dS is the area of the loop. The direction
of curl A is perpendicular to the plane of the loop, when it is in the orientation
giving I
max
, with the sense given by the righthand grip rule assuming that the
loop is righthanded.
Let us now express curl A in terms of the components of A. First, we shall
evaluate
_
A· dl around a small rectangle in the yz plane. The contribution from
y
z
z+dz
z
y y+dy
1
2
3
4
sides 1 and 3 is
A
z
(y +dy) dz −A
z
(y) dz =
∂A
z
∂y
dy dz. (2.138)
The contribution from sides 2 and 4 is
−A
y
(z +dz) dy +A
y
(z) dy = −
∂A
y
∂y
dy dz. (2.139)
So, the total of all contributions gives
_
A· dl =
_
∂A
z
∂y
−
∂A
y
∂z
_
dS, (2.140)
where dS = dy dz is the area of the loop.
41
Consider a nonrectangular (but still small) loop in the yz plane. We can
divide it into rectangular elements and form
_
A· dl over all the resultant loops.
The interior contributions cancel, so we are just left with the contribution from
the outer loop. Also, the area of the outer loop is the sum of all the areas of the
inner loops. We conclude that
_
A· dl =
_
∂A
z
∂y
−
∂A
y
∂z
_
dS
x
(2.141)
is valid for a small loop dS = (dS
x
, 0, 0) of any shape in the yz plane. Likewise,
we can show that if the loop is in the xz plane then dS = (0, dS
y
, 0) and
_
A· dl =
_
∂A
x
∂z
−
∂A
z
∂x
_
dS
y
. (2.142)
Finally, if the loop is in the xy plane then dS = (0, 0, dS
z
) and
_
A· dl =
_
∂A
y
∂x
−
∂A
x
∂y
_
dS
z
. (2.143)
Imagine an arbitrary loop of vector area dS = (dS
x
, dS
y
, dS
z
). We can con
struct this out of three loops in the x, y, and z directions, as indicated in the
diagram below. If we form the line integral around all three loops then the inte
x
y
z
S d
3
1
2
rior contributions cancel and we are left with the line integral around the original
42
loop. Thus,
_
A· dl =
_
A· dl
1
+
_
A· dl
2
+
_
A· dl
3
, (2.144)
giving
_
A· dl = curl A· dS = curl AdS cos θ, (2.145)
where
curl A =
_
∂A
z
∂y
−
∂A
y
∂z
,
∂A
x
∂z
−
∂A
z
∂x
,
∂A
y
∂x
−
∂A
x
∂y
_
. (2.146)
Note that
curl A = ∇∧ A. (2.147)
This demonstrates that curl A is a good vector ﬁeld, since it is the cross product
of the ∇ operator (a good vector operator) and the vector ﬁeld A.
Consider a solid body rotating about the zaxis. The angular velocity is given
by ω = (0, 0, ω), so the rotation velocity at position r is
v = ω ∧ r (2.148)
[see Eq. (2.39) ]. Let us evaluate curl v on the axis of rotation. The xcomponent
is proportional to the integral
_
v · dl around a loop in the yz plane. This
is plainly zero. Likewise, the ycomponent is also zero. The zcomponent is
_
v · dl/dS around some loop in the xy plane. Consider a circular loop. We have
_
v · dl = 2πr ωr with dS = πr
2
. Here, r is the radial distance from the rotation
axis. It follows that (curl v)
z
= 2ω, which is independent of r. So, on the axis
curl v = (0, 0, 2ω). Oﬀ the axis, at position r
0
, we can write
v = ω ∧ (r −r
0
) +ω ∧ r
0
. (2.149)
The ﬁrst part has the same curl as the velocity ﬁeld on the axis, and the second
part has zero curl since it is constant. Thus, curl v = (0, 0, 2ω) everywhere in the
body. This allows us to form a physical picture of curl A. If we imagine A as the
velocity ﬁeld of some ﬂuid then curl A at any given point is equal to twice the
local angular rotation velocity, i.e., 2ω. Hence, a vector ﬁeld with curl A = 0
everywhere is said to be irrotational.
43
Another important result of vector ﬁeld theory is the curl theorem or Stokes’
theorem:
_
C
A· dl =
_
S
curl A· dS, (2.150)
for some (nonplanar) surface S bounded by a rim C. This theorem can easily be
proved by splitting the loop up into many small rectangular loops and forming
the integral around all of the resultant loops. All of the contributions from the
interior loops cancel, leaving just the contribution from the outer rim. Making
use of Eq. (2.145) for each of the small loops, we can see that the contribution
from all of the loops is also equal to the integral of curl A· dS across the whole
surface. This proves the theorem.
C
One immediate consequence of of Stokes’ theorem is that curl A is “incom
pressible.” Consider two surfaces, S
1
and S
2
, which share the same rim. It is clear
from Stokes’ theorem that
_
curl A· dS is the same for both surfaces. Thus, it
follows that
_
curl A· dS = 0 for any closed surface. However, we have from the
divergence theorem that
_
curl A· dS =
_
div(curl A) dV = 0 for any volume.
Hence,
div(curl A) ≡ 0. (2.151)
So, the ﬁeldlines of curl A never begin or end. In other words, curl A is a
solenoidal ﬁeld.
We have seen that for a conservative ﬁeld
_
A · dl = 0 for any loop. This
is entirely equivalent to A = gradφ. However, the magnitude of curl A is
44
lim
dS→0
_
A· dl/dS for some particular loop. It is clear then that curl A = 0
for a conservative ﬁeld. In other words,
curl(gradφ) ≡ 0. (2.152)
Thus, a conservative ﬁeld is also an irrotational one.
Finally, it can be shown that
curl(curl A) = grad(div A) −∇
2
A, (2.153)
where
∇
2
A = (∇
2
A
x
, ∇
2
A
y
, ∇
2
A
z
). (2.154)
It should be emphasized, however, that the above result is only valid in Cartesian
coordinates.
2.18 Summary
Vector addition:
a +b ≡ (a
x
+b
x
, a
y
+b
y
, a
z
+b
z
)
Vector multiplication:
na ≡ (na
x
, na
y
, na
z
)
Scalar product:
a · b = a
x
b
x
+a
y
b
y
+a
z
b
z
Vector product:
a ∧ b = (a
y
b
z
−a
z
b
y
, a
z
b
x
−a
x
b
z
, a
x
b
y
−a
y
b
x
)
Scalar triple product:
a · b ∧ c = a ∧ b · c = b · c ∧ a = −b · a ∧ c
45
Vector triple product:
a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a · c)b −(a · b)c
(a ∧ b) ∧ c = (a · c)b −(b · c)a
Gradient:
gradφ =
_
∂φ
∂x
,
∂φ
∂y
,
∂φ
∂z
_
Divergence:
div A =
∂A
x
∂x
+
∂A
y
∂y
+
∂A
z
∂z
Curl:
curl A =
_
∂A
z
∂y
−
∂A
y
∂z
,
∂A
x
∂z
−
∂A
z
∂x
,
∂A
y
∂x
−
∂A
x
∂y
_
Gauss’ theorem:
_
S
A· dS =
_
V
div AdV
Stokes’ theorem:
_
C
A· dl =
_
S
curl A· dS
Del operator:
∇ =
_
∂
∂x
,
∂
∂y
,
∂
∂z
_
gradφ = ∇φ
div A = ∇· A
curl A = ∇∧ A
Vector identities:
∇· ∇φ = ∇
2
φ =
_
∂
2
φ
∂x
2
+
∂
2
φ
∂y
2
+
∂
2
φ
∂z
2
_
46
∇· ∇∧ A = 0
∇∧ ∇φ = 0
∇
2
A = ∇(∇· A) −∇∧ ∇∧ A
Other vector identities:
∇(φψ) = φ∇(ψ) +ψ∇(φ)
∇· (φA) = φ∇· A+A· ∇φ
∇∧ (φA) = φ∇∧ A+∇φ ∧ A
∇· (A∧ B) = B · ∇∧ A−A· ∇∧ B
∇∧ (A∧ B) = A(∇· B) −B(∇· A) + (B · ∇)A−(A· ∇)B
∇(A· B) = A∧ (∇∧ B) +B ∧ (∇∧ A) + (A· ∇)B + (B · ∇)A
Acknowledgment
This section is almost entirely based on my undergraduate notes taken during a
course of lectures given by Dr. Steven Gull of the Cavendish Laboratory, Cam
bridge.
47
3 Maxwell’s equations
3.1 Coulomb’s law
Between 1785 and 1787 the French physicist Charles Augustine de Coulomb per
formed a series of experiments involving electric charges and eventually estab
lished what is nowadays known as “Coulomb’s law.” According to this law the
force acting between two charges is radial, inversesquare, and proportional to the
product of the charges. Two like charges repel one another whereas two unlike
charges attract. Suppose that two charges, q
1
and q
2
, are located at position
vectors r
1
and r
2
. The electrical force acting on the second charge is written
f
2
=
q
1
q
2
4π
0
r
2
−r
1
[r
2
−r
1
[
3
(3.1)
in vector notation. An equal and opposite force acts on the ﬁrst charge, in
accordance with Newton’s third law of motion. The SI unit of electric charge is
q
1
q
2
f
1
r
f
r
1 2
2
r
_
r
2 1
the coulomb (C). The charge of an electron is 1.6022 10
−19
C. The universal
constant
0
is called the “permittivity of free space” and takes the value
0
= 8.8542 10
−12
C
2
N
−1
m
−2
. (3.2)
Coulomb’s law has the same mathematical form as Newton’s law of gravity.
Suppose that two masses, m
1
and m
2
, are located at position vectors r
1
and r
2
.
48
The gravitational force acting on the second mass is written
f
2
= −Gm
1
m
2
r
2
−r
1
[r
2
−r
1
[
3
(3.3)
in vector notation. The gravitational constant G takes the value
G = 6.6726 10
−11
Nm
2
kg
−2
. (3.4)
Coulomb’s law and Newton’s law are both “inversesquare”; i.e.
[f
2
[ ∝
1
[r
2
−r
1
[
2
. (3.5)
However, they diﬀer in two crucial respects. Firstly, the force due to gravity
is always attractive (there is no such thing as a negative mass!). Secondly, the
magnitudes of the two forces are vastly diﬀerent. Consider the ratio of the elec
trical and gravitational forces acting on two particles. This ratio is a constant,
independent of the relative positions of the particles, and is given by
[f
electrical
[
[f
gravitational
[
=
q
1
m
1
q
2
m
2
1
4π
0
G
. (3.6)
For electrons the charge to mass ratio q/m = 1.759 10
11
Ckg
−1
, so
[f
electrical
[
[f
gravitational
[
= 4.17 10
42
. (3.7)
This is a colossal number! Suppose you had a homework problem involving the
motion of particles in a box under the action of two forces with the same range
but diﬀering in magnitude by a factor 10
42
. I think that most people would write
on line one something like “it is a good approximation to neglect the weaker force
in favour of the stronger one.” In fact, most people would write this even if the
forces diﬀered in magnitude by a factor 10! Applying this reasoning to the motion
of particles in the universe we would expect the universe to be governed entirely
by electrical forces. However, this is not the case. The force which holds us to
the surface of the Earth, and prevents us from ﬂoating oﬀ into space, is gravity.
The force which causes the Earth to orbit the Sun is also gravity. In fact, on
49
astronomical lengthscales gravity is the dominant force and electrical forces are
largely irrelevant. The key to understanding this paradox is that there are both
positive and negative electric charges whereas there are only positive gravitational
“charges.” This means that gravitational forces are always cumulative whereas
electrical forces can cancel one another out. Suppose, for the sake of argument,
that the universe starts out with randomly distributed electric charges. Initially,
we expect electrical forces to completely dominate gravity. These forces try to
make every positive charge get as far away as possible from other positive charges
and as close as possible to other negative charges. After a bit we expect the
positive and negative charges to form close pairs. Just how close is determined
by quantum mechanics but, in general, it is pretty close; i.e., about 10
−10
m.
The electrical forces due to the charges in each pair eﬀectively cancel one another
out on lengthscales much larger than the mutual spacing of the pair. It is only
possible for gravity to be the dominant longrange force if the number of positive
charges in the universe is almost equal to the number of negative charges. In this
situation every positive change can ﬁnd a negative charge to team up with and
there are virtually no charges left over. In order for the cancellation of longrange
electrical forces to be eﬀective the relative diﬀerence in the number of positive
and negative charges in the universe must be incredibly small. In fact, positive
and negative charges have to cancel each other out to such accuracy that most
physicists believe that the net charge of the universe is exactly zero. But, it is
not enough for the universe to start out with zero charge. Suppose there were
some elementary particle process which did not conserve electric charge. Even
if this were to go on at a very low rate it would not take long before the ﬁne
balance between positive and negative charges in the universe were wrecked. So,
it is important that electric charge is a conserved quantity (i.e., the charge of the
universe can neither increase or decrease). As far as we know, this is the case.
To date no elementary particle reactions have been discovered which create or
destroy net electric charge.
In summary, there are two longrange forces in the universe, electromagnetism
and gravity. The former is enormously stronger than the latter, but is usually
“hidden” away inside neutral atoms. The ﬁne balance of forces due to negative
and positive electric charges starts to break down on atomic scales. In fact, inter
atomic and intermolecular forces are electrical in nature. So, electrical forces are
basically what prevent us from falling though the ﬂoor. But, this is electromag
50
netism on the microscopic or atomic scale; what is usually known as “quantum
electromagnetism.” This course is about “classical electromagnetism”; that is,
electromagnetism on lengthscales much larger than the atomic scale. Classical
electromagnetism generally describes phenomena in which some sort of “violence”
is done to matter, so that the close pairing of negative and positive charges is
disrupted. This allows electrical forces to manifest themselves on macroscopic
lengthscales. Of course, very little disruption is necessary before gigantic forces
are generated. It is no coincidence that the vast majority of useful machines which
mankind has devised during the last century are electromagnetic in nature.
Coulomb’s law and Newton’s law are both examples of what are usually re
ferred to as “action at a distance” theories. According to Eqs. (3.1) and (3.3), if
the ﬁrst charge or mass is moved then the force acting on the second charge or
mass immediately responds. In particular, equal and opposite forces act on the
two charges or masses at all times. However, this cannot be correct according
to Einstein’s theory of relativity. The maximum speed with which information
can propagate through the universe is the speed of light. So, if the ﬁrst charge
or mass is moved then there must always be time delay (i.e., at least the time
needed for a light signal to propagate between the two charges or masses) be
fore the second charge or mass responds. Consider a rather extreme example.
Suppose the ﬁrst charge or mass is suddenly annihilated. The second charge or
mass only ﬁnds out about this some time later. During this time interval the
second charge or mass experiences an electrical or gravitational force which is
as if the ﬁrst charge or mass were still there. So, during this period there is an
action but no reaction, which violates Newton’s third law of motion. It is clear
that “action at a distance” is not compatible with relativity and, consequently,
that Newton’s third law of motion is not strictly true. Of course, Newton’s third
law is intimately tied up with the conservation of momentum in the universe. A
concept which most physicists are loath to abandon. It turns out that we can
“rescue” momentum conservation by abandoning “action at a distance” theories
and adopting socalled “ﬁeld” theories in which there is a medium, called a ﬁeld,
which transmits the force from one particle to another. In electromagnetism there
are, in fact, two ﬁelds; the electric ﬁeld and the magnetic ﬁeld. Electromagnetic
forces are transmitted though these ﬁelds at the speed of light, which implies
that the laws of relativity are never violated. Moreover, the ﬁelds can soak up
energy and momentum. This means that even when the actions and reactions
51
acting on particles are not quite equal and opposite, momentum is still conserved.
We can bypass some of the problematic aspects of “action at a distance” by only
considering steadystate situations. For the moment, this is how we shall proceed.
Consider N charges, q
1
though q
N
, which are located at position vectors r
1
through r
N
. Electrical forces obey what is known as the principle of superposition.
The electrical force acting on a test charge q at position vector r is simply the
vector sum of all of the Coulomb law forces from each of the N charges taken in
isolation. In other words, the electrical force exerted by the ith charge (say) on
the test charge is the same as if all the other charges were not there. Thus, the
force acting on the test charge is given by
f(r) = q
N
i=1
q
i
4π
0
r −r
i
[r −r
i
[
3
. (3.8)
It is helpful to deﬁne a vector ﬁeld E(r), called the electric ﬁeld, which is the
force exerted on a unit test charge located at position vector r. So, the force on
a test charge is written
f = q E, (3.9)
and the electric ﬁeld is given by
E(r) =
N
i=1
q
i
4π
0
r −r
i
[r −r
i
[
3
. (3.10)
At this point, we have no reason to believe that the electric ﬁeld has any real
existence; it is just a useful device for calculating the force which acts on test
charges placed at various locations.
The electric ﬁeld from a single charge q located at the origin is purely ra
dial, points outwards if the charge is positive, inwards if it is negative, and has
magnitude
E
r
(r) =
q
4π
0
r
2
, (3.11)
where r = [r[.
52
q
E
We can represent an electric ﬁeld by “ﬁeldlines.” The direction of the lines
indicates the direction of the local electric ﬁeld and the density of the lines per
pendicular to this direction is proportional to the magnitude of the local electric
ﬁeld. Thus, the ﬁeld of a point positive charge is represented by a group of equally
spaced straight lines radiating from the charge.
The electric ﬁeld from a collection of charges is simply the vector sum of the
ﬁelds from each of the charges taken in isolation. In other words, electric ﬁelds
are completely superposable. Suppose that, instead of having discrete charges,
we have a continuous distribution of charge represented by a charge density ρ(r).
Thus, the charge at position vector r
is ρ(r
) d
3
r
, where d
3
r
is the volume
element at r
. It follows from a simple extension of Eq. (3.10) that the electric
ﬁeld generated by this charge distribution is
E(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
r −r
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
, (3.12)
where the volume integral is over all space, or, at least, over all space for which
ρ(r
) is nonzero.
53
3.2 The electric scalar potential
Suppose that r = (x, y, z) and r
= (x
, y
, z
) in Cartesian coordinates. The x
component of (r −r
)/[r −r
[
3
is written
x −x
[(x −x
)
2
+ (y −y
)
2
+ (z −z
)
2
]
3/2
. (3.13)
However, it is easily demonstrated that
x −x
[(x −x
)
2
+ (y −y
)
2
+ (z −z
)
2
]
3/2
=
−
∂
∂x
1
[(x −x
)
2
+ (y −y
)
2
+ (z −z
)
2
]
1/2
. (3.14)
Since there is nothing special about the xaxis we can write
r −r
[r −r
[
3
= −∇
_
1
[r −r
[
_
, (3.15)
where ∇ ≡ (∂/∂x, ∂/∂y, ∂/∂z) is a diﬀerential operator which involves the com
ponents of r but not those of r
. It follows from Eq. (3.12) that
E = −∇φ, (3.16)
where
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.17)
Thus, the electric ﬁeld generated by a collection of ﬁxed charges can be written
as the gradient of a scalar potential, and this potential can be expressed as a
simple volume integral involving the charge distribution.
The scalar potential generated by a charge q located at the origin is
φ(r) =
q
4π
0
r
. (3.18)
54
According to Eq. (3.10) the scalar potential generated by a set of N discrete
charges q
i
, located at r
i
, is
φ(r) =
N
i=1
φ
i
(r), (3.19)
where
φ
i
(r) =
q
i
4π
0
[r −r
i
[
. (3.20)
Thus, the scalar potential is just the sum of the potentials generated by each of
the charges taken in isolation.
Suppose that a particle of charge q is taken along some path from point P to
point Q. The net work done on the particle by electrical forces is
W =
_
Q
P
f dl, (3.21)
where f is the electrical force and dl is a line element along the path. Making
use of Eqs. (3.9) and (3.16) we obtain
W = q
_
Q
P
E dl = −q
_
Q
P
∇φ dl = −q ( φ(Q) −φ(P) ) . (3.22)
Thus, the work done on the particle is simply minus its charge times the diﬀer
ence in electric potential between the end point and the beginning point. This
quantity is clearly independent of the path taken from P to Q. So, an electric
ﬁeld generated by stationary charges is an example of a conservative ﬁeld. In
fact, this result follows immediately from vector ﬁeld theory once we are told, in
Eq. (3.16), that the electric ﬁeld is the gradient of a scalar potential. The work
done on the particle when it is taken around a closed path is zero, so
_
C
E dl = 0 (3.23)
for any closed loop C. This implies from Stokes’ theorem that
∇∧ E = 0 (3.24)
55
for any electric ﬁeld generated by stationary charges. Equation (3.24) also follows
directly from Eq. (3.16), since ∇∧ ∇φ = 0 for any scalar potential φ.
The SI unit of electric potential is the volt, which is equivalent to a joule per
coulomb. Thus, according to Eq. (3.22) the electrical work done on a particle
when it is taken between two points is the product of its charge and the voltage
diﬀerence between the points.
We are familiar with the idea that a particle moving in a gravitational ﬁeld
possesses potential energy as well as kinetic energy. If the particle moves from
point P to a lower point Q then the gravitational ﬁeld does work on the par
ticle causing its kinetic energy to increase. The increase in kinetic energy of
the particle is balanced by an equal decrease in its potential energy so that the
overall energy of the particle is a conserved quantity. Therefore, the work done
on the particle as it moves from P to Q is minus the diﬀerence in its gravi
tational potential energy between points Q and P. Of course, it only makes
sense to talk about gravitational potential energy because the gravitational ﬁeld
is conservative. Thus, the work done in taking a particle between two points is
path independent and, therefore, well deﬁned. This means that the diﬀerence
in potential energy of the particle between the beginning and end points is also
well deﬁned. We have already seen that an electric ﬁeld generated by stationary
charges is a conservative ﬁeld. In follows that we can deﬁne an electrical potential
energy of a particle moving in such a ﬁeld. By analogy with gravitational ﬁelds,
the work done in taking a particle from point P to point Q is equal to minus the
diﬀerence in potential energy of the particle between points Q and P. It follows
from Eq. (3.22) that the potential energy of the particle at a general point Q,
relative to some reference point P, is given by
c(Q) = q φ(Q). (3.25)
Free particles try to move down gradients of potential energy in order to attain a
minimum potential energy state. Thus, free particles in the Earth’s gravitational
ﬁeld tend to fall downwards. Likewise, positive charges moving in an electric ﬁeld
tend to migrate towards regions with the most negative voltage and vice versa
for negative charges.
The scalar electric potential is undeﬁned to an additive constant. So, the
56
transformation
φ(r) →φ(r) +c (3.26)
leaves the electric ﬁeld unchanged according to Eq. (3.16). The potential can
be ﬁxed unambiguously by specifying its value at a single point. The usual
convention is to say that the potential is zero at inﬁnity. This convention is
implicit in Eq. (3.17), where it can be seen that φ →0 as [r[ →∞ provided that
the total charge
_
ρ(r
) d
3
r
is ﬁnite.
3.3 Gauss’ law
Consider a single charge located at the origin. The electric ﬁeld generated by
such a charge is given by Eq. (3.11). Suppose that we surround the charge by a
concentric spherical surface S of radius r. The ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld through
this surface is given by
r
S
V
q
_
S
E dS =
_
S
E
r
dS
r
= E
r
(r) 4πr
2
=
q
4π
0
r
2
4πr
2
=
q
0
, (3.27)
since the normal to the surface is always parallel to the local electric ﬁeld. How
ever, we also know from Gauss’ theorem that
_
S
E dS =
_
V
∇ E d
3
r, (3.28)
57
where V is the volume enclosed by surface S. Let us evaluate ∇ E directly. In
Cartesian coordinates the ﬁeld is written
E =
q
4π
0
_
x
r
3
,
y
r
3
,
z
r
3
_
, (3.29)
where r
2
= x
2
+y
2
+z
2
. So,
∂E
x
∂x
=
q
4π
0
_
1
r
3
−
3x
r
4
x
r
_
=
q
4π
0
r
2
−3x
2
r
5
. (3.30)
Here, use has been made of
∂r
∂x
=
x
r
. (3.31)
Formulae analogous to Eq. (3.30) can be obtained for ∂E
y
/∂y and ∂E
z
/∂z. The
divergence of the ﬁeld is given by
∇ E =
∂E
x
∂x
+
∂E
y
∂y
+
∂E
z
∂z
=
q
4π
0
3r
2
−3x
2
−3y
2
−3z
2
r
5
= 0. (3.32)
This is a puzzling result! We have from Eqs. (3.27) and (3.28) that
_
V
∇ E d
3
r =
q
0
, (3.33)
and yet we have just proved that ∇ E = 0. This paradox can be resolved after a
close examination of Eq. (3.32). At the origin (r = 0) we ﬁnd that ∇ E = 0/0,
which means that ∇ E can take any value at this point. Thus, Eqs. (3.32) and
(3.33) can be reconciled if ∇ E is some sort of “spike” function; i.e., it is zero
everywhere except arbitrarily close to the origin, where it becomes very large.
This must occur in such a manner that the volume integral over the “spike” is
ﬁnite.
Let us examine how we might construct a onedimensional “spike” function.
Consider the “boxcar” function
g(x, ) =
_
1/ for [x[ < /2
0 otherwise.
(3.34)
58
1/ε
ε/2 −ε/2 x
g(x)
It is clear that that
_
∞
−∞
g(x, ) dx = 1. (3.35)
Now consider the function
δ(x) = lim
→0
g(x, ). (3.36)
This is zero everywhere except arbitrarily close to x = 0. According to Eq. (3.35),
it also possess a ﬁnite integral;
_
∞
−∞
δ(x) dx = 1. (3.37)
Thus, δ(x) has all of the required properties of a “spike” function. The one
dimensional “spike” function δ(x) is called the “Dirac deltafunction” after the
Cambridge physicist Paul Dirac who invented it in 1927 while investigating quan
tum mechanics. The deltafunction is an example of what mathematicians call a
“generalized function”; it is not welldeﬁned at x = 0, but its integral is never
theless welldeﬁned. Consider the integral
_
∞
−∞
f(x) δ(x) dx, (3.38)
where f(x) is a function which is wellbehaved in the vicinity of x = 0. Since the
deltafunction is zero everywhere apart from very close to x = 0, it is clear that
_
∞
−∞
f(x) δ(x) dx = f(0)
_
∞
−∞
δ(x) dx = f(0), (3.39)
59
where use has been made of Eq. (3.37). The above equation, which is valid for
any wellbehaved function f(x), is eﬀectively the deﬁnition of a deltafunction.
A simple change of variables allows us to deﬁne δ(x − x
0
), which is a “spike”
function centred on x = x
0
. Equation (3.39) gives
_
∞
−∞
f(x) δ(x −x
0
) dx = f(x
0
). (3.40)
We actually want a threedimensional “spike” function; i.e., a function which
is zero everywhere apart from close to the origin, and whose volume integral
is unity. If we denote this function by δ(r) then it is easily seen that the
threedimensional deltafunction is the product of three onedimensional delta
functions:
δ(r) = δ(x)δ(y)δ(z). (3.41)
This function is clearly zero everywhere except the origin. But is its volume
integral unity? Let us integrate over a cube of dimensions 2a which is centred on
the origin and aligned along the Cartesian axes. This volume integral is obviously
separable, so that
_
δ(r) d
3
r =
_
a
−a
δ(x) dx
_
a
−a
δ(y) dy
_
a
−a
δ(z) dz. (3.42)
The integral can be turned into an integral over all space by taking the limit a →
∞. However, we know that for onedimensional deltafunctions
_
∞
−∞
δ(x) dx = 1,
so it follows from the above equation that
_
δ(r) d
3
r = 1, (3.43)
which is the desired result. A simple generalization of previous arguments yields
_
f(r) δ(r) d
3
r = f(0), (3.44)
where f(r) is any wellbehaved scalar ﬁeld. Finally, we can change variables and
write
δ(r −r
) = δ(x −x
)δ(y −y
)δ(z −z
), (3.45)
60
which is a threedimensional “spike” function centred on r = r
. It is easily
demonstrated that
_
f(r) δ(r −r
) d
3
r = f(r
). (3.46)
Up to now we have only considered volume integrals taken over all space. How
ever, it should be obvious that the above result also holds for integrals over any
ﬁnite volume V which contains the point r = r
. Likewise, the integral is zero if
V does not contain r = r
.
Let us now return to the problem in hand. The electric ﬁeld generated by a
charge q located at the origin has ∇ E = 0 everywhere apart from the origin,
and also satisﬁes
_
V
∇ E d
3
r =
q
0
(3.47)
for a spherical volume V centered on the origin. These two facts imply that
∇ E =
q
0
δ(r), (3.48)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.43).
At this stage, you are probably not all that impressed with vector ﬁeld theory.
After all we have just spent an inordinately long time proving something using
vector ﬁeld theory which we previously proved in one line [see Eq. (3.27) ] using
conventional analysis! Let me now demonstrate the power of vector ﬁeld theory.
Consider, again, a charge q at the origin surrounded by a spherical surface S
which is centered on the origin. Suppose that we now displace the surface S, so
that it is no longer centered on the origin. What is the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld
out of S? This is no longer a simple problem for conventional analysis because
the normal to the surface is not parallel to the local electric ﬁeld. However, using
vector ﬁeld theory this problem is no more diﬃcult than the previous one. We
have
_
S
E dS =
_
V
∇ E d
3
r (3.49)
from Gauss’ theorem, plus Eq. (3.48). From these, it is clear that the ﬂux of E
out of S is q/
0
for a spherical surface displaced from the origin. However, the
ﬂux becomes zero when the displacement is suﬃciently large that the origin is
61
q
S
no longer enclosed by the sphere. It is possible to prove this from conventional
analysis, but it is not easy! Suppose that the surface S is not spherical but
is instead highly distorted. What now is the ﬂux of E out of S? This is a
virtually impossible problem in conventional analysis, but it is easy using vector
ﬁeld theory. Gauss’ theorem and Eq. (3.48) tell us that the ﬂux is q/
0
provided
that the surface contains the origin, and that the ﬂux is zero otherwise. This
result is independent of the shape of S.
q
S
Consider N charges q
i
located at r
i
. A simple generalization of Eq. (3.48)
62
gives
∇ E =
N
i=1
q
i
0
δ(r −r
i
). (3.50)
Thus, Gauss’ theorem (3.49) implies that
_
S
E dS =
_
V
∇ E d
3
r =
Q
0
, (3.51)
where Q is the total charge enclosed by the surface S. This result is called Gauss’
law and does not depend on the shape of the surface.
Suppose, ﬁnally, that instead of having a set of discrete charges we have a
continuous charge distribution described by a charge density ρ(r). The charge
contained in a small rectangular volume of dimensions dx, dy, and dz, located at
position r is Q = ρ(r) dxdy dz. However, if we integrate ∇ E over this volume
element we obtain
∇ E dxdy dz =
Q
0
=
ρ dxdy dz
0
, (3.52)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.51). Here, the volume element is assumed to
be suﬃciently small that ∇ E does not vary signiﬁcantly across it. Thus, we
obtain
∇ E =
ρ
0
. (3.53)
This is the ﬁrst of four ﬁeld equations, called Maxwell’s equations, which together
form a complete description of electromagnetism. Of course, our derivation of
Eq. (3.53) is only valid for electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charge distribu
tions. In principle, additional terms might be required to describe ﬁelds generated
by moving charge distributions. However, it turns out that this is not the case
and that Eq. (3.53) is universally valid.
Equation (3.53) is a diﬀerential equation describing the electric ﬁeld generated
by a set of charges. We already know the solution to this equation when the
charges are stationary; it is given by Eq. (3.12):
E(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
r −r
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
. (3.54)
63
Equations (3.53) and (3.54) can be reconciled provided
∇
_
r −r
[r −r
[
3
_
= −∇
2
_
1
[r −r
[
_
= 4π δ(r −r
), (3.55)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.15). It follows that
∇ E(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
) ∇
_
r −r
[r −r
[
3
_
d
3
r
=
_
ρ(r
)
0
δ(r −r
) d
3
r
=
ρ(r)
0
, (3.56)
which is the desired result. The most general form of Gauss’ law, Eq. (3.51), is
obtained by integrating Eq. (3.53) over a volume V surrounded by a surface S
and making use of Gauss’ theorem:
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ(r) d
3
r. (3.57)
3.4 Poisson’s equation
We have seen that the electric ﬁeld generated by a set of stationary charges can
be written as the gradient of a scalar potential, so that
E = −∇φ. (3.58)
This equation can be combined with the ﬁeld equation (3.53) to give a partial
diﬀerential equation for the scalar potential:
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
. (3.59)
This is an example of a very famous type of partial diﬀerential equation known
as “Poisson’s equation.”
In its most general form Poisson’s equation is written
∇
2
u = v, (3.60)
64
where u(r) is some scalar potential which is to be determined and v(r) is a
known “source function.” The most common boundary condition applied to this
equation is that the potential u is zero at inﬁnity. The solutions to Poisson’s
equation are completely superposable. Thus, if u
1
is the potential generated by
the source function v
1
, and u
2
is the potential generated by the source function
v
2
, so that
∇
2
u
1
= v
1
, ∇
2
u
2
= v
2
, (3.61)
then the potential generated by v
1
+v
2
is u
1
+u
2
, since
∇
2
(u
1
+u
2
) = ∇
2
u
1
+∇
2
u
2
= v
1
+v
2
. (3.62)
Poisson’s equation has this property because it is linear in both the potential and
the source term.
The fact that the solutions to Poisson’s equation are superposable suggests
a general method for solving this equation. Suppose that we could construct
all of the solutions generated by point sources. Of course, these solutions must
satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions. Any general source function can be
built up out of a set of suitably weighted point sources, so the general solution of
Poisson’s equation must be expressible as a weighted sum over the point source
solutions. Thus, once we know all of the point source solutions we can construct
any other solution. In mathematical terminology we require the solution to
∇
2
G(r, r
) = δ(r −r
) (3.63)
which goes to zero as [r[ →∞. The function G(r, r
) is the solution generated by
a point source located at position r
. In mathematical terminology this function
is known as a “Green’s function.” The solution generated by a general source
function v(r) is simply the appropriately weighted sum of all of the Green’s
function solutions:
u(r) =
_
G(r, r
)v(r
) d
3
r
. (3.64)
We can easily demonstrate that this is the correct solution:
∇
2
u(r) =
_
_
∇
2
G(r, r
)
¸
v(r
) d
3
r
=
_
δ(r −r
) v(r
) d
3
r
= v(r). (3.65)
65
Let us return to Eq. (3.59):
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
. (3.66)
The Green’s function for this equation satisﬁes Eq. (3.63) with [G[ → ∞ as
[r[ →0. It follows from Eq. (3.55) that
G(r, r
) = −
1
4π
1
[r −r
[
. (3.67)
Note from Eq. (3.20) that the Green’s function has the same form as the potential
generated by a point charge. This is hardly surprising given the deﬁnition of a
Green’s function. It follows from Eq. (3.64) and (3.67) that the general solution
to Poisson’s equation (3.66) is written
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.68)
In fact, we have already obtained this solution by another method [see Eq. (3.17) ].
3.5 Amp`ere’s experiments
In 1820 the Danish physicist Hans Christian Ørsted was giving a lecture demon
stration of various electrical and magnetic eﬀects. Suddenly, much to his surprise,
he noticed that the needle of a compass he was holding was deﬂected when he
moved it close to a current carrying wire. Up until then magnetism has been
thought of as solely a property of some rather unusual rocks called loadstones.
Word of this discovery spread quickly along the scientiﬁc grapevine, and the
French physicist Andre Marie Amp`ere immediately decided to investigate fur
ther. Amp`ere’s apparatus consisted (essentially) of a long straight wire carrying
an electric current current I. Amp`ere quickly discovered that the needle of a small
compass maps out a series of concentric circular loops in the plane perpendicular
to a current carrying wire. The direction of circulation around these magnetic
loops is conventionally taken to be the direction in which the north pole of the
compass needle points. Using this convention, the circulation of the loops is given
66
I
direction of north pole
of compass needle
by a righthand rule: if the thumb of the righthand points along the direction of
the current then the ﬁngers of the righthand circulate in the same sense as the
magnetic loops.
Amp`ere’s next series of experiments involved bringing a short test wire, car
rying a current I
, close to the original wire and investigating the force exerted on
the test wire. This experiment is not quite as clear cut as Coulomb’s experiment
I
I
/
test wire
currentcarrying
because, unlike electric charges, electric currents cannot exist as point entities;
they have to ﬂow in complete circuits. We must imagine that the circuit which
connects with the central wire is suﬃciently far away that it has no appreciable
inﬂuence on the outcome of the experiment. The circuit which connects with the
test wire is more problematic. Fortunately, if the feed wires are twisted around
each other, as indicated in the diagram, then they eﬀectively cancel one another
67
out and also do not inﬂuence the outcome of the experiment.
Amp`ere discovered that the force exerted on the test wire is directly propor
tional to its length. He also made the following observations. If the current in the
test wire (i.e., the test current) ﬂows parallel to the current in the central wire
then the two wires attract one another. If the current in the test wire is reversed
then the two wires repel one another. If the test current points radially towards
the central wire (and the current in the central wire ﬂows upwards) then the test
wire is subject to a downwards force. If the test current is reversed then the force
is upwards. If the test current is rotated in a single plane, so that it starts parallel
to the central current and ends up pointing radially towards it, then the force on
the test wire is of constant magnitude and is always at right angles to the test
current. If the test current is parallel to a magnetic loop then there is no force
exerted on the test wire. If the test current is rotated in a single plane, so that it
starts parallel to the central current and ends up pointing along a magnetic loop,
then the magnitude of the force on the test wire attenuates like cos θ (where θ is
the angle the current is turned through; θ = 0 corresponds to the case where the
test current is parallel to the central current), and its direction is again always at
right angles to the test current. Finally, Amp`ere was able to establish that the
attractive force between two parallel current carrying wires is proportional to the
product of the two currents, and falls oﬀ like one over the perpendicular distance
between the wires.
This rather complicated force law can be summed up succinctly in vector
notation provided that we deﬁne a vector ﬁeld B, called the magnetic ﬁeld,
whose direction is always parallel to the loops mapped out by a small compass.
The dependence of the force per unit length, F, acting on a test wire with the
diﬀerent possible orientations of the test current is described by
F = I
∧ B, (3.69)
where I
is a vector whose direction and magnitude are the same as those of the
test current. Incidentally, the SI unit of electric current is the ampere (A), which
is the same as a coulomb per second. The SI unit of magnetic ﬁeld strength
is the tesla (T), which is the same as a newton per ampere per meter. The
variation of the force per unit length acting on a test wire with the strength of
the central current and the perpendicular distance r to the central wire is summed
68
up by saying that the magnetic ﬁeld strength is proportional to I and inversely
proportional to r. Thus, deﬁning cylindrical polar coordinates aligned along the
axis of the central current, we have
B
θ
=
µ
0
I
2πr
, (3.70)
with B
r
= B
z
= 0. The constant of proportionality µ
0
is called the “permeability
of free space” and takes the value
µ
0
= 4π 10
−7
NA
−2
. (3.71)
The concept of a magnetic ﬁeld allows the calculation of the force on a test
wire to be conveniently split into two parts. In the ﬁrst part, we calculate the
magnetic ﬁeld generated by the current ﬂowing in the central wire. This ﬁeld
circulates in the plane normal to the wire; its magnitude is proportional to the
central current and inversely proportional to the perpendicular distance from the
wire. In the second part, we use Eq. (3.69) to calculate the force per unit length
acting on a short current carrying wire located in the magnetic ﬁeld generated
by the central current. This force is perpendicular to both the magnetic ﬁeld and
the direction of the test current. Note that, at this stage, we have no reason to
suppose that the magnetic ﬁeld has any real existence. It is introduced merely to
facilitate the calculation of the force exerted on the test wire by the central wire.
3.6 The Lorentz force
The ﬂow of an electric current down a conducting wire is ultimately due to the
motion of electrically charged particles (in most cases, electrons) through the
conducting medium. It seems reasonable, therefore, that the force exerted on
the wire when it is placed in a magnetic ﬁeld is really the resultant of the forces
exerted on these moving charges. Let us suppose that this is the case.
Let A be the (uniform) crosssectional area of the wire, and let n be the
number density of mobile charges in the conductor. Suppose that the mobile
charges each have charge q and velocity v. We must assume that the conductor
also contains stationary charges, of charge −q and number density n, say, so that
69
the net charge density in the wire is zero. In most conductors the mobile charges
are electrons and the stationary charges are atomic nuclei. The magnitude of
the electric current ﬂowing through the wire is simply the number of coulombs
per second which ﬂow past a given point. In one second a mobile charge moves
a distance v, so all of the charges contained in a cylinder of crosssectional area
A and length v ﬂow past a given point. Thus, the magnitude of the current is
q nAv. The direction of the current is the same as the direction of motion of the
charges, so the vector current is I
= q nAv. According to Eq. (3.69) the force
per unit length acting on the wire is
F = q nAv ∧ B. (3.72)
However, a unit length of the wire contains nA moving charges. So, assuming
that each charge is subject to an equal force from the magnetic ﬁeld (we have no
reason to suppose otherwise), the force acting on an individual charge is
f = q v ∧ B. (3.73)
We can combine this with Eq. (3.9) to give the force acting on a charge q moving
with velocity v in an electric ﬁeld E and a magnetic ﬁeld B:
f = q E +q v ∧ B. (3.74)
This is called the “Lorentz force law” after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon
Lorentz who ﬁrst formulated it. The electric force on a charged particle is parallel
to the local electric ﬁeld. The magnetic force, however, is perpendicular to both
the local magnetic ﬁeld and the particle’s direction of motion. No magnetic force
is exerted on a stationary charged particle.
The equation of motion of a free particle of charge q and mass m moving in
electric and magnetic ﬁelds is
m
dv
dt
= q E +q v ∧ B, (3.75)
according to the Lorentz force law. This equation of motion was veriﬁed in a
famous experiment carried out by the Cambridge physicist J.J. Thompson in
1897. Thompson was investigating “cathode rays,” a then mysterious form of
70
radiation emitted by a heated metal element held at a large negative voltage (i.e.
a cathode) with respect to another metal element (i.e., an anode) in an evacuated
tube. German physicists held that cathode rays were a form of electromagnetic
radiation, whilst British and French physicists suspected that they were, in reality,
a stream of charged particles. Thompson was able to demonstrate that the latter
view was correct. In Thompson’s experiment the cathode rays passed though
a region of “crossed” electric and magnetic ﬁelds (still in vacuum). The ﬁelds
were perpendicular to the original trajectory of the rays and were also mutually
perpendicular.
Let us analyze Thompson’s experiment. Suppose that the rays are originally
traveling in the xdirection, and are subject to a uniform electric ﬁeld E in the
zdirection and a uniform magnetic ﬁeld B in the −ydirection. Let us assume, as
Thompson did, that cathode rays are a stream of particles of mass m and charge
q. The equation of motion of the particles in the zdirection is
m
d
2
z
dt
2
= q (E −vB) , (3.76)
where v is the velocity of the particles in the xdirection. Thompson started oﬀ his
experiment by only turning on the electric ﬁeld in his apparatus and measuring
the deﬂection d of the ray in the zdirection after it had traveled a distance l
through the electric ﬁeld. It is clear from the equation of motion that
d =
q
m
E t
2
2
=
q
m
E l
2
2v
2
, (3.77)
where the “time of ﬂight” t is replaced by l/v. This formula is only valid if d ¸l,
which is assumed to be the case. Next, Thompson turned on the magnetic ﬁeld
in his apparatus and adjusted it so that the cathode ray was no longer deﬂected.
The lack of deﬂection implies that the net force on the particles in the zdirection
is zero. In other words, the electric and magnetic forces balance exactly. It follows
from Eq. (3.76) that with a properly adjusted magnetic ﬁeld strength
v =
E
B
. (3.78)
Thus, Eqs. (3.77) and (3.78) and can be combined and rearranged to give the
71
charge to mass ratio of the particles in terms of measured quantities:
q
m
=
2dE
l
2
B
2
. (3.79)
Using this method Thompson inferred that cathode rays were made up of nega
tively charged particles (the sign of the charge is obvious from the direction of the
deﬂection in the electric ﬁeld) with a charge to mass ratio of −1.7 10
11
C/kg.
A decade later in 1908 the American Robert Millikan performed his famous “oil
drop” experiment and discovered that mobile electric charges are quantized in
units of −1.6 10
−19
C. Assuming that mobile electric charges and the parti
cles which make up cathode rays are one and the same thing, Thompson’s and
Millikan’s experiments imply that the mass of these particles is 9.4 10
−31
kg.
Of course, this is the mass of an electron (the modern value is 9.1 10
−31
kg),
and −1.6 10
−19
C is the charge of an electron. Thus, cathode rays are, in fact,
streams of electrons which are emitted from a heated cathode and then acceler
ated because of the large voltage diﬀerence between the cathode and anode.
If a particle is subject to a force f and moves a distance δr in a time interval
δt then the work done on the particle by the force is
δW = f δr. (3.80)
The power input to the particle from the force ﬁeld is
P = lim
δt→0
δW
δt
= f v, (3.81)
where v is the particle’s velocity. It follows from the Lorentz force law, Eq. (3.74),
that the power input to a particle moving in electric and magnetic ﬁelds is
P = q v E. (3.82)
Note that a charged particle can gain (or lose) energy from an electric ﬁeld but not
from a magnetic ﬁeld. This is because the magnetic force is always perpendicular
to the particle’s direction of motion and, therefore, does no work on the particle
[see Eq. (3.80) ]. Thus, in particle accelerators magnetic ﬁelds are often used to
guide particle motion (e.g., in a circle) but the actual acceleration is performed
by electric ﬁelds.
72
3.7 Amp`ere’s law
Magnetic ﬁelds, like electric ﬁelds, are completely superposable. So, if a ﬁeld
B
1
is generated by a current I
1
ﬂowing through some circuit, and a ﬁeld B
2
is
generated by a current I
2
ﬂowing through another circuit, then when the currents
I
1
and I
2
ﬂow through both circuits simultaneously the generated magnetic ﬁeld
is B
1
+B
2
.
B
1
I
1
I
2
B
2
F F
r
Consider two parallel wires separated by a perpendicular distance r and car
rying electric currents I
1
and I
2
, respectively. The magnetic ﬁeld strength at the
second wire due to the current ﬂowing in the ﬁrst wire is B = µ
0
I
1
/2πr. This
ﬁeld is orientated at right angles to the second wire, so the force per unit length
exerted on the second wire is
F =
µ
0
I
1
I
2
2πr
. (3.83)
This follows from Eq. (3.69), which is valid for continuous wires as well as short
test wires. The force acting on the second wire is directed radially inwards to
wards the ﬁrst wire. The magnetic ﬁeld strength at the ﬁrst wire due to the
current ﬂowing in the second wire is B = µ
0
I
2
/2πr. This ﬁeld is orientated at
right angles to the ﬁrst wire, so the force per unit length acting on the ﬁrst wire
is equal and opposite to that acting on the second wire, according to Eq. (3.69).
Equation (3.83) is sometimes called “Amp`ere’s law” and is clearly another exam
ple of an “action at a distance” law; i.e., if the current in the ﬁrst wire is suddenly
changed then the force on the second wire immediately adjusts, whilst in reality
there should be a short time delay, at least as long as the propagation time for a
73
light signal between the two wires. Clearly, Amp`ere’s law is not strictly correct.
However, as long as we restrict our investigations to steady currents it is perfectly
adequate.
3.8 Magnetic monopoles?
Suppose that we have an inﬁnite straight wire carrying an electric current I. Let
the wire be aligned along the zaxis. The magnetic ﬁeld generated by such a wire
is written
B =
µ
0
I
2π
_
−y
r
2
,
x
r
2
, 0
_
(3.84)
in Cartesian coordinates, where r =
_
x
2
+y
2
. The divergence of this ﬁeld is
∇ B =
µ
0
I
2π
_
2yx
r
4
−
2xy
r
4
_
= 0, (3.85)
where use has been made of ∂r/∂x = x/r, etc. We saw in Section 3.3 that the
divergence of the electric ﬁeld appeared, at ﬁrst sight, to be zero, but, in reality,
it was a deltafunction because the volume integral of ∇ E was nonzero. Does
the same sort of thing happen for the divergence of the magnetic ﬁeld? Well,
if we could ﬁnd a closed surface S for which
_
S
B dS ,= 0 then according to
Gauss’ theorem
_
V
∇ BdV ,= 0 where V is the volume enclosed by S. This
would certainly imply that ∇ B is some sort of deltafunction. So, can we ﬁnd
such a surface? The short answer is, no. Consider a cylindrical surface aligned
with the wire. The magnetic ﬁeld is everywhere tangential to the outward surface
element, so this surface certainly has zero magnetic ﬂux coming out of it. In fact,
it is impossible to invent any closed surface for which
_
S
B dS ,= 0 with B given
by Eq. (3.84) (if you do not believe me, try it yourselves!). This suggests that
the divergence of a magnetic ﬁeld generated by steady electric currents really is
zero. Admittedly, we have only proved this for inﬁnite straight currents, but, as
will be demonstrated presently, it is true in general.
If ∇ B = 0 then B is a solenoidal vector ﬁeld. In other words, ﬁeld lines
of B never begin or end; instead, they form closed loops. This is certainly the
case in Eq. (3.84) where the ﬁeld lines are a set of concentric circles centred
74
on the zaxis. In fact, the magnetic ﬁeld lines generated by any set of electric
currents form closed loops, as can easily be checked by tracking the magnetic
lines of force using a small compass. What about magnetic ﬁelds generated by
permanent magnets (the modern equivalent of loadstones)? Do they also always
form closed loops? Well, we know that a conventional bar magnet has both a
north and south magnetic pole (like the Earth). If we track the magnetic ﬁeld
lines with a small compass they all emanate from the south pole, spread out, and
eventually reconverge on the north pole. It appears likely (but we cannot prove
it with a compass) that the ﬁeld lines inside the magnet connect from the north
to the south pole so as to form closed loops.
N
S
Can we produce an isolated north or south magnetic pole; for instance, by
snapping a bar magnet in two? A compass needle would always point towards an
isolated north pole, so this would act like a negative “magnetic charge.” Likewise,
a compass needle would always point away from an isolated south pole, so this
would act like a positive “magnetic charge.” It is clear from the diagram that if
we take a closed surface S containing an isolated magnetic pole, which is usually
termed a “magnetic monopole,” then
_
S
B dS ,= 0; the ﬂux will be positive for
an isolated south pole and negative for an isolated north pole. It follows from
Gauss’ theorem that if
_
S
B dS ,= 0 then ∇ B ,= 0. Thus, the statement that
magnetic ﬁelds are solenoidal, or that ∇ B = 0, is equivalent to the statement
that there are no magnetic monopoles. It is not clear, a priori, that this is a
true statement. In fact, it is quite possible to formulate electromagnetism so
as to allow for magnetic monopoles. However, as far as we know, there are no
magnetic monopoles in the universe. At least, if there are any then they are all
75
N
S
hiding from us! We know that if we try to make a magnetic monopole by snapping
a bar magnet in two then we just end up with two smaller bar magnets. If we
snap one of these smaller magnets in two then we end up with two even smaller
bar magnets. We can continue this process down to the atomic level without ever
producing a magnetic monopole. In fact, permanent magnetism is generated by
electric currents circulating on the atomic scale, so this type of magnetism is not
fundamentally diﬀerent to the magnetism generated by macroscopic currents.
In conclusion, all steady magnetic ﬁelds in the universe are generated by
circulating electric currents of some description. Such ﬁelds are solenoidal; that
is, they form closed loops and satisfy the ﬁeld equation
∇ B = 0. (3.86)
This, incidentally, is the second of Maxwell’s equations. Essentially, it says that
there are no such things as magnetic monopoles. We have only proved that
∇ B = 0 for steady magnetic ﬁelds but, in fact, this is also the case for time
dependent ﬁelds (see later).
3.9 Amp`ere’s other law
Consider, again, an inﬁnite straight wire aligned along the zaxis and carrying a
current I. The ﬁeld generated by such a wire is written
B
θ
=
µ
0
I
2πr
(3.87)
76
in cylindrical polar coordinates. Consider a circular loop C in the xy plane which
is centred on the wire. Suppose that the radius of this loop is r. Let us evaluate
the line integral
_
C
B dl. This integral is easy to perform because the magnetic
ﬁeld is always parallel to the line element. We have
_
C
B dl =
_
B
θ
rdθ = µ
0
I. (3.88)
However, we know from Stokes’ theorem that
_
S
B dl =
_
S
∇∧ B dS, (3.89)
where S is any surface attached to the loop C. Let us evaluate ∇∧ B directly.
C
S
I
According to Eq. (3.84):
(∇∧ B)
x
=
∂B
z
∂y
−
∂B
y
∂z
= 0,
(∇∧ B)
y
=
∂B
x
∂z
−
∂B
z
∂x
= 0, (3.90)
(∇∧ B)
z
=
∂B
y
∂x
−
∂B
x
∂y
=
µ
0
I
2π
_
1
r
2
−
2x
2
r
4
+
1
r
2
−
2y
2
r
4
_
= 0,
where use has been made of ∂r/∂x = x/r, etc. We now have a problem. Equations
(3.88) and (3.89) imply that
_
S
∇∧ B dS = µ
0
I; (3.91)
77
but we have just demonstrated that ∇∧B = 0. This problem is very reminiscent
of the diﬃculty we had earlier with ∇ E. Recall that
_
V
∇ EdV = q/
0
for a
volume V containing a discrete charge q, but that ∇E = 0 at a general point. We
got around this problem by saying that ∇E is a threedimensional deltafunction
whose “spike” is coincident with the location of the charge. Likewise, we can get
around our present diﬃculty by saying that ∇ ∧ B is a twodimensional delta
function. A threedimensional deltafunction is a singular (but integrable) point
in space, whereas a twodimensional deltafunction is a singular line in space. It
is clear from an examination of Eqs. (3.90) that the only component of ∇ ∧ B
which can be singular is the zcomponent, and that this can only be singular on
the zaxis (i.e., r = 0). Thus, the singularity coincides with the location of the
current, and we can write
∇∧ B = µ
0
I δ(x)δ(y) ˆ z. (3.92)
The above equation certainly gives (∇∧B)
x
= (∇∧B)
y
= 0, and (∇∧B)
z
= 0
everywhere apart from the zaxis, in accordance with Eqs. (3.90). Suppose that
we integrate over a plane surface S connected to the loop C. The surface element
is dS = dxdy ˆ z, so
_
S
∇∧ B dS = µ
0
I
_ _
δ(x)δ(y) dxdy (3.93)
where the integration is performed over the region
_
x
2
+y
2
≤ r. However, since
the only part of S which actually contributes to the surface integral is the bit
which lies inﬁnitesimally close to the zaxis, we can integrate over all x and y
without changing the result. Thus, we obtain
_
S
∇∧ B dS = µ
0
I
_
∞
−∞
δ(x) dx
_
∞
−∞
δ(y) dy = µ
0
I, (3.94)
which is in agreement with Eq. (3.91).
You might again be wondering why we have gone to so much trouble to prove
something using vector ﬁeld theory which can be demonstrated in one line via
conventional analysis [see Eq. (3.88) ]. The answer, of course, is that the vector
ﬁeld result is easily generalized whereas the conventional result is just a special
78
case. For instance, suppose that we distort our simple circular loop C so that it
is no longer circular or even lies in one plane. What now is the line integral of B
around the loop? This is no longer a simple problem for conventional analysis,
because the magnetic ﬁeld is not parallel to the line element of the loop. However,
according to Stokes’ theorem
_
C
B dl =
_
S
∇∧ B dS, (3.95)
with ∇∧ B given by Eq. (3.92). Note that the only part of S which contributes
to the surface integral is an inﬁnitesimal region centered on the zaxis. So, as
long as S actually intersects the zaxis it does not matter what shape the rest
the surface is, we always get the same answer for the surface integral, namely
_
C
B dl =
_
S
∇∧ B dS = µ
0
I. (3.96)
Thus, provided the curve C circulates the zaxis, and therefore any surface S
attached to C intersects the zaxis, the line integral
_
C
B dl is equal to µ
0
I.
Of course, if C does not circulate the zaxis then an attached surface S does
not intersect the zaxis and
_
C
B dl is zero. There is one more proviso. The
line integral
_
C
B dl is µ
0
I for a loop which circulates the zaxis in a clockwise
direction (looking up the zaxis). However, if the loop circulates in an anti
clockwise direction then the integral is −µ
0
I. This follows because in the latter
case the zcomponent of the surface element dS is oppositely directed to the
current ﬂow at the point where the surface intersects the wire.
Let us now consider N wires directed along the zaxis, with coordinates (x
i
,
y
i
) in the xy plane, each carrying a current I
i
in the positive zdirection. It is
fairly obvious that Eq. (3.92) generalizes to
∇∧ B = µ
0
N
i=1
I
i
δ(x −x
i
)δ(y −y
i
) ˆ z. (3.97)
If we integrate the magnetic ﬁeld around some closed curve C, which can have
any shape and does not necessarily lie in one plane, then Stokes’ theorem and the
above equation imply that
_
C
B dl =
_
S
∇∧ B dS = µ
0
1, (3.98)
79
where 1 is the total current enclosed by the curve. Again, if the curve circulates
the ith wire in a clockwise direction (looking down the direction of current ﬂow)
then the wire contributes I
i
to the aggregate current 1. On the other hand, if
the curve circulates in an anticlockwise direction then the wire contributes −I
i
.
Finally, if the curve does not circulate the wire at all then the wire contributes
nothing to 1.
Equation (3.97) is a ﬁeld equation describing how a set of zdirected current
carrying wires generate a magnetic ﬁeld. These wires have zerothickness, which
implies that we are trying to squeeze a ﬁnite amount of current into an inﬁnites
imal region. This accounts for the deltafunctions on the righthand side of the
equation. Likewise, we obtained deltafunctions in Section 3.3 because we were
dealing with point charges. Let us now generalize to the more realistic case of
diﬀuse currents. Suppose that the zcurrent ﬂowing through a small rectangle
in the xy plane, centred on coordinates (x, y) and of dimensions dx and dy, is
j
z
(x, y) dxdy. Here, j
z
is termed the current density in the zdirection. Let us
integrate (∇∧B)
z
over this rectangle. The rectangle is assumed to be suﬃciently
small that (∇∧B)
z
does not vary appreciably across it. According to Eq. (3.98)
this integral is equal to µ
0
times the total zcurrent ﬂowing through the rectangle.
Thus,
(∇∧ B)
z
dxdy = µ
0
j
z
dxdy, (3.99)
which implies that
(∇∧ B)
z
= µ
0
j
z
. (3.100)
Of course, there is nothing special about the zaxis. Suppose we have a set of
diﬀuse currents ﬂowing in the xdirection. The current ﬂowing through a small
rectangle in the yz plane, centred on coordinates (y, z) and of dimensions dy and
dz, is given by j
x
(y, z) dy dz, where j
x
is the current density in the xdirection.
It is fairly obvious that we can write
(∇∧ B)
x
= µ
0
j
x
, (3.101)
with a similar equation for diﬀuse currents ﬂowing along the yaxis. We can
combine these equations with Eq. (3.100) to form a single vector ﬁeld equation
which describes how electric currents generate magnetic ﬁelds:
∇∧ B = µ
0
j, (3.102)
80
where j = (j
x
, j
y
, j
z
) is the vector current density. This is the third Maxwell equa
tion. The electric current ﬂowing through a small area dS located at position r is
j(r) dS. Suppose that space is ﬁlled with particles of charge q, number density
n(r), and velocity v(r). The charge density is given by ρ(r) = qn. The current
density is given by j(r) = qnv and is obviously a proper vector ﬁeld (velocities
are proper vectors since they are ultimately derived from displacements).
If we form the line integral of B around some general closed curve C, making
use of Stokes’ theorem and the ﬁeld equation (3.102), then we obtain
_
C
B dl = µ
0
_
S
j dS. (3.103)
In other words, the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around any closed loop C is
equal to µ
0
times the ﬂux of the current density through C. This result is called
Amp`ere’s (other) law. If the currents ﬂow in zerothickness wires then Amp`ere’s
law reduces to Eq. (3.98).
The ﬂux of the current density through C is evaluated by integrating j dS
over any surface S attached to C. Suppose that we take two diﬀerent surfaces
S
1
and S
2
. It is clear that if Amp`ere’s law is to make any sense then the surface
integral
_
S
1
j dS had better equal the integral
_
S
2
j dS. That is, when we work
out the ﬂux of the current though C using two diﬀerent attached surfaces then
we had better get the same answer, otherwise Eq. (3.103) is wrong. We saw in
C
S
S
1
2
Section 2 that if the integral of a vector ﬁeld A over some surface attached to a
loop depends only on the loop, and is independent of the surface which spans it,
81
then this implies that ∇ A = 0. The ﬂux of the current density through any
loop C is is calculated by evaluating the integral
_
S
j dS for any surface S which
spans the loop. According to Amp`ere’s law, this integral depends only on C and
is completely independent of S (i.e., it is equal to the line integral of B around C,
which depends on C but not on S). This implies that ∇ j = 0. In fact, we can
obtain this relation directly from the ﬁeld equation (3.102). We know that the
divergence of a curl is automatically zero, so taking the divergence of Eq. (3.102)
we obtain
∇ j = 0. (3.104)
We have shown that if Amp`ere’s law is to make any sense then we need
∇ j = 0. Physically this implies that the net current ﬂowing through any closed
surface S is zero. Up to now we have only considered stationary charges and
steady currents. It is clear that if all charges are stationary and all currents are
steady then there can be no net current ﬂowing through a closed surface S, since
this would imply a build up of charge in the volume V enclosed by S. In other
words, as long as we restrict our investigation to stationary charges and steady
currents then we expect ∇ j = 0, and Amp`ere’s law makes sense. However,
suppose that we now relax this restriction. Suppose that some of the charges in
a volume V decide to move outside V . Clearly, there will be a nonzero net ﬂux
of electric current through the bounding surface S whilst this is happening. This
implies from Gauss’ theorem that ∇ j ,= 0. Under these circumstances Amp`ere’s
law collapses in a heap. We shall see later that we can rescue Amp`ere’s law by
adding an extra term involving a time derivative to the righthand side of the ﬁeld
equation (3.102). For steady state situations (i.e., ∂/∂t = 0) this extra term can
be neglected. Thus, the ﬁeld equation ∇∧B = µ
0
j is, in fact, only twothirds of
Maxwell’s third equation; there is a term missing on the righthand side.
We have now derived two ﬁeld equations involving magnetic ﬁelds (actually,
we have only derived one and twothirds):
∇ B = 0, (3.105a)
∇∧ B = µ
0
j. (3.105b)
We obtained these equations by looking at the ﬁelds generated by inﬁnitely long,
straight, steady currents. This, of course, is a rather special class of currents.
82
We should now go back and repeat the process for general currents. In fact, if
we did this we would ﬁnd that the above ﬁeld equations still hold (provided that
the currents are steady). Unfortunately, this demonstration is rather messy and
extremely tedious. There is a better approach. Let us assume that the above ﬁeld
equations are valid for any set of steady currents. We can then, with relatively
little eﬀort, use these equations to generate the correct formula for the magnetic
ﬁeld induced by a general set of steady currents, thus proving that our assumption
is correct. More of this later.
3.10 Helmholtz’s theorem: A mathematical digression
Let us now embark on a slight mathematical digression. Up to now we have
only studied the electric and magnetic ﬁelds generated by stationary charges and
steady currents. We have found that these ﬁelds are describable in terms of four
ﬁeld equations:
∇ E =
ρ
0
,
∇∧ E = 0 (3.106)
for electric ﬁelds, and
∇ B = 0,
∇∧ B = µ
0
j (3.107)
for magnetic ﬁelds. There are no other ﬁeld equations. This strongly suggests that
if we know the divergence and the curl of a vector ﬁeld then we know everything
there is to know about the ﬁeld. In fact, this is the case. There is a mathematical
theorem which sums this up. It is called Helmholtz’s theorem after the German
polymath Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz.
Let us start with scalar ﬁelds. Field equations are a type of diﬀerential equa
tion; i.e., they deal with the inﬁnitesimal diﬀerences in quantities between neigh
bouring points. The question is, what diﬀerential equation completely speciﬁes
a scalar ﬁeld? This is easy. Suppose that we have a scalar ﬁeld φ and a ﬁeld
83
equation which tells us the gradient of this ﬁeld at all points: something like
∇φ = A, (3.108)
where A(r) is a vector ﬁeld. Note that we need ∇∧ A = 0 for self consistency,
since the curl of a gradient is automatically zero. The above equation completely
speciﬁes φ once we are given the value of the ﬁeld at a single point, P say. Thus,
φ(Q) = φ(P) +
_
Q
P
∇φ dl = φ(P) +
_
Q
P
A dl, (3.109)
where Qis a general point. The fact that ∇∧A = 0 means that Ais a conservative
ﬁeld which guarantees that the above equation gives a unique value for φ at a
general point in space.
Suppose that we have a vector ﬁeld F. How many diﬀerential equations do
we need to completely specify this ﬁeld? Hopefully, we only need two: one giving
the divergence of the ﬁeld and one giving its curl. Let us test this hypothesis.
Suppose that we have two ﬁeld equations:
∇ F = D, (3.110a)
∇∧ F = C, (3.110b)
where D is a scalar ﬁeld and C is a vector ﬁeld. For selfconsistency we need
∇ C = 0, (3.111)
since the divergence of a curl is automatically zero. The question is, do these
two ﬁeld equations plus some suitable boundary conditions completely specify
F? Suppose that we write
F = −∇U +∇∧ W. (3.112)
In other words, we are saying that a general ﬁeld F is the sum of a conservative
ﬁeld, ∇U, and a solenoidal ﬁeld, ∇∧ W. This sounds plausible, but it remains
to be proved. Let us start by taking the divergence of the above equation and
making use of Eq. (3.110a). We get
∇
2
U = −D. (3.113)
84
Note that the vector ﬁeld W does not ﬁgure in this equation because the diver
gence of a curl is automatically zero. Let us now take the curl of Eq. (3.112):
∇∧ F = ∇∧ ∇∧ W = ∇(∇ W) −∇
2
W = −∇
2
W. (3.114)
Here, we assume that the divergence of W is zero. This is another thing which
remains to be proved. Note that the scalar ﬁeld U does not ﬁgure in this equation
because the curl of a divergence is automatically zero. Using Eq. (3.110b) we get
∇
2
W
x
= −C
x
,
∇
2
W
y
= −C
y
, (3.115)
∇
2
W
z
= −C
z
,
So, we have transformed our problem into four diﬀerential equations, Eq. (3.113)
and Eqs. (3.115), which we need to solve. Let us look at these equations. We
immediately notice that they all have exactly the same form. In fact, they are all
versions of Poisson’s equation. We can now make use of a principle made famous
by Richard P. Feynman: “the same equations have the same solutions.” Recall
that earlier on we came across the following equation:
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
, (3.116)
where φ is the electrostatic potential and ρ is the charge density. We proved that
the solution to this equation, with the boundary condition that φ goes to zero at
inﬁnity, is
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.117)
Well, if the same equations have the same solutions, and Eq. (3.117) is the solution
to Eq. (3.116), then we can immediately write down the solutions to Eq. (3.113)
and Eqs. (3.115). We get
U(r) =
1
4π
_
D(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.118)
and
W
x
(r) =
1
4π
_
C
x
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
,
85
W
y
(r) =
1
4π
_
C
y
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.119)
W
z
(r) =
1
4π
_
C
z
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
.
The last three equations can be combined to form a single vector equation:
W(r) =
1
4π
_
C(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.120)
We assumed earlier that ∇ W = 0. Let us check to see if this is true. Note
that
∂
∂x
_
1
[r −r
[
_
= −
x −x
[r −r
[
3
=
x
−x
[r −r
[
3
= −
∂
∂x
_
1
[r −r
[
_
, (3.121)
which implies that
∇
_
1
[r −r
[
_
= −∇
_
1
[r −r
[
_
, (3.122)
where ∇
is the operator (∂/∂x
, ∂/∂y
, ∂/∂z
). Taking the divergence of Eq. (3.120)
and making use of the above relation, we obtain
∇ W =
1
4π
_
C(r
) ∇
_
1
[r −r
[
_
d
3
r
= −
1
4π
_
C(r
) ∇
_
1
[r −r
[
_
d
3
r
.
(3.123)
Now
_
∞
−∞
g
∂f
∂x
dx = [gf]
∞
−∞
−
_
∞
−∞
f
∂g
∂x
dx. (3.124)
However, if gf → 0 as x → ±∞ then we can neglect the ﬁrst term on the
righthand side of the above equation and write
_
∞
−∞
g
∂f
∂x
dx = −
_
∞
−∞
f
∂g
∂x
dx. (3.125)
A simple generalization of this result yields
_
g ∇f d
3
r = −
_
f ∇ g d
3
r, (3.126)
86
provided that g
x
f →0 as [r[ →∞, etc. Thus, we can deduce that
∇ W =
1
4π
_
∇
C(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
(3.127)
from Eq. (3.123), provided [C(r)[ is bounded as [r[ → ∞. However, we have
already shown that ∇ C = 0 from selfconsistency arguments, so the above
equation implies that ∇ W = 0, which is the desired result.
We have constructed a vector ﬁeld F which satisﬁes Eqs. (3.110) and behaves
sensibly at inﬁnity; i.e., [F[ → 0 as [r[ → ∞. But, is our solution the only
possible solution of Eqs. (3.110) with sensible boundary conditions at inﬁnity?
Another way of posing this question is to ask whether there are any solutions of
∇
2
U = 0, ∇
2
W
i
= 0, (3.128)
where i denotes x, y, or z, which are bounded at inﬁnity. If there are then we are
in trouble, because we can take our solution and add to it an arbitrary amount
of a vector ﬁeld with zero divergence and zero curl and thereby obtain another
solution which also satisﬁes physical boundary conditions. This would imply that
our solution is not unique. In other words, it is not possible to unambiguously
reconstruct a vector ﬁeld given its divergence, its curl, and physical boundary
conditions. Fortunately, the equation
∇
2
φ = 0, (3.129)
which is called Laplace’s equation, has a very nice property: its solutions are
unique. That is, if we can ﬁnd a solution to Laplace’s equation which satisﬁes
the boundary conditions then we are guaranteed that this is the only solution.
We shall prove this later on in the course. Well, let us invent some solutions to
Eqs. (3.128) which are bounded at inﬁnity. How about
U = W
i
= 0? (3.130)
These solutions certainly satisfy Laplace’s equation and are wellbehaved at in
ﬁnity. Because the solutions to Laplace’s equations are unique, we know that
Eqs. (3.130) are the only solutions to Eqs. (3.128). This means that there is
no vector ﬁeld which satisﬁes physical boundary equations at inﬁnity and has
87
zero divergence and zero curl. In other words, our solution to Eqs. (3.110) is
the only solution. Thus, we have unambiguously reconstructed the vector ﬁeld F
given its divergence, its curl, and sensible boundary conditions at inﬁnity. This
is Helmholtz’s theorem.
We have just proved a number of very useful, and also very important, points.
First, according to Eq. (3.112), a general vector ﬁeld can be written as the sum
of a conservative ﬁeld and a solenoidal ﬁeld. Thus, we ought to be able to write
electric and magnetic ﬁelds in this form. Second, a general vector ﬁeld which is
zero at inﬁnity is completely speciﬁed once its divergence and its curl are given.
Thus, we can guess that the laws of electromagnetism can be written as four ﬁeld
equations,
∇ E = something,
∇∧ E = something, (3.131)
∇ B = something,
∇∧ B = something,
without knowing the ﬁrst thing about electromagnetism (other than the fact that
it deals with two vector ﬁelds). Of course, Eq. (3.106) and (3.107) are of exactly
this form. We also know that there are only four ﬁeld equations, since the above
equations are suﬃcient to completely reconstruct both E and B. Furthermore,
we know that we can solve the ﬁeld equations without even knowing what the
righthand sides look like. After all, we solved Eqs. (3.110) for completely general
righthand sides. (Actually, the righthand sides have to go to zero at inﬁnity
otherwise integrals like Eq. (3.118) blow up.) We also know that any solutions
we ﬁnd are unique. In other words, there is only one possible steady electric
and magnetic ﬁeld which can be generated by a given set of stationary charges
and steady currents. The third thing which we proved was that if the righthand
sides of the above ﬁeld equations are all zero then the only physical solution is
E = B = 0. This implies that steady electric and magnetic ﬁelds cannot generate
themselves, instead they have to be generated by stationary charges and steady
currents. So, if we come across a steady electric ﬁeld we know that if we trace
the ﬁeld lines back we shall eventually ﬁnd a charge. Likewise, a steady magnetic
ﬁeld implies that there is a steady current ﬂowing somewhere. All of these results
88
follow from vector ﬁeld theory, i.e., from the general properties of ﬁelds in three
dimensional space, prior to any investigation of electromagnetism.
3.11 The magnetic vector potential
Electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charges obey
∇∧ E = 0. (3.132)
This immediately allows us to write
E = −∇φ, (3.133)
since the curl of a gradient is automatically zero. In fact, whenever we come across
an irrotational vector ﬁeld in physics we can always write it as the gradient of
some scalar ﬁeld. This is clearly a useful thing to do since it enables us to replace
a vector ﬁeld by a much simpler scalar ﬁeld. The quantity φ in the above equation
is known as the electric scalar potential.
Magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady currents (and unsteady currents, for that
matter) satisfy
∇ B = 0. (3.134)
This immediately allows us to write
B = ∇∧ A, (3.135)
since the divergence of a curl is automatically zero. In fact, whenever we come
across a solenoidal vector ﬁeld in physics we can always write it as the curl of
some other vector ﬁeld. This is not an obviously useful thing to do, however, since
it only allows us to replace one vector ﬁeld by another. Nevertheless, Eq. (3.135)
is probably the single most useful equation we shall come across in this lecture
course. The quantity A is known as the magnetic vector potential.
We know from Helmholtz’s theorem that a vector ﬁeld is fully speciﬁed by its
divergence and its curl. The curl of the vector potential gives us the magnetic
ﬁeld via Eq. (3.135). However, the divergence of A has no physical signiﬁcance.
89
In fact, we are completely free to choose ∇ A to be whatever we like. Note that,
according to Eq. (3.135), the magnetic ﬁeld is invariant under the transformation
A →A−∇ψ. (3.136)
In other words, the vector potential is undetermined to the gradient of a scalar
ﬁeld. This is just another way of saying that we are free to choose ∇ A. Re
call that the electric scalar potential is undetermined to an arbitrary additive
constant, since the transformation
φ →φ +c (3.137)
leaves the electric ﬁeld invariant in Eq. (3.133). The transformations (3.136) and
(3.137) are examples of what mathematicians call “gauge transformations.” The
choice of a particular function ψ or a particular constant c is referred to as a
choice of the gauge. We are free to ﬁx the gauge to be whatever we like. The
most sensible choice is the one which makes our equations as simple as possible.
The usual gauge for the scalar potential φ is such that φ → 0 at inﬁnity. The
usual gauge for A is such that
∇ A = 0. (3.138)
This particular choice is known as the “Coulomb gauge.”
It is obvious that we can always add a constant to φ so as to make it zero
at inﬁnity. But it is not at all obvious that we can always perform a gauge
transformation such as to make ∇ A zero. Suppose that we have found some
vector ﬁeld A whose curl gives the magnetic ﬁeld but whose divergence in non
zero. Let
∇ A = v(r). (3.139)
The question is, can we ﬁnd a scalar ﬁeld ψ such that after we perform the gauge
transformation (3.136) we are left with ∇ A = 0. Taking the divergence of
Eq. (3.136) it is clear that we need to ﬁnd a function ψ which satisﬁes
∇
2
ψ = v. (3.140)
But this is just Poisson’s equation (again!). We know that we can always ﬁnd a
unique solution of this equation (see Section 3.10). This proves that, in practice,
we can always set the divergence of A equal to zero.
90
Let us consider again an inﬁnite straight wire directed along the zaxis and
carrying a current I. The magnetic ﬁeld generated by such a wire is written
B =
µ
0
I
2π
_
−y
r
2
,
x
r
2
, 0
_
. (3.141)
We wish to ﬁnd a vector potential A whose curl is equal to the above magnetic
ﬁeld and whose divergence is zero. It is not diﬃcult to see that
A = −
µ
0
I
4π
_
0, 0, ln(x
2
+y
2
)
_
(3.142)
ﬁts the bill. Note that the vector potential is parallel to the direction of the
current. This would seem to suggest that there is a more direct relationship
between the vector potential and the current than there is between the magnetic
ﬁeld and the current. The potential is not very well behaved on the zaxis, but
this is just because we are dealing with an inﬁnitely thin current.
Let us take the curl of Eq. (3.135). We ﬁnd that
∇∧ B = ∇∧ ∇∧ A = ∇(∇ A) −∇
2
A = −∇
2
A, (3.143)
where use has been made of the Coulomb gauge condition (3.138). We can com
bine the above relation with the ﬁeld equation (3.102) to give
∇
2
A = −µ
0
j. (3.144)
Writing this in component form, we obtain
∇
2
A
x
= −µ
0
j
x
,
∇
2
A
y
= −µ
0
j
y
, (3.145)
∇
2
A
z
= −µ
0
j
z
.
But, this is just Poisson’s equation three times over. We can immediately write
the unique solutions to the above equations:
A
x
(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j
x
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
,
91
A
y
(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j
y
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.146)
A
z
(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j
z
(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
.
These solutions can be recombined to form a single vector solution
A(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.147)
Of course, we have seen a equation like this before:
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.148)
Equations (3.147) and (3.148) are the unique solutions (given the arbitrary choice
of gauge) to the ﬁeld equations (3.106) and (3.107); they specify the magnetic
vector and electric scalar potentials generated by a set of stationary charges,
of charge density ρ(r), and a set of steady currents, of current density j(r).
Incidentally, we can prove that Eq. (3.147) satisﬁes the gauge condition ∇ A = 0
by repeating the analysis of Eqs. (3.121)–(3.127) (with W → A and C → µ
0
j)
and using the fact that ∇ j = 0 for steady currents.
3.12 The BiotSavart law
According to Eq. (3.133) we can obtain an expression for the electric ﬁeld gen
erated by stationary charges by taking minus the gradient of Eq. (3.148). This
yields
E(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
r −r
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
, (3.149)
which we recognize as Coulomb’s law written for a continuous charge distribution.
According to Eq. (3.135) we can obtain an equivalent expression for the magnetic
ﬁeld generated by steady currents by taking the curl of Eq. (3.147). This gives
B(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
) ∧ (r −r
)
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
, (3.150)
92
where use has been made of the vector identity ∇∧ (φA) = φ∇∧ A + ∇φ ∧ A.
Equation (3.150) is known as the “BiotSavart law” after the French physicists
Jean Baptiste Biot and Felix Savart; it completely speciﬁes the magnetic ﬁeld
generated by a steady (but otherwise quite general) distributed current.
Let us reduce our distributed current to an idealized zero thickness wire. We
can do this by writing
j(r) d
3
r = I(r) dl, (3.151)
where I is the vector current (i.e., its direction and magnitude specify the direc
tion and magnitude of the current) and dl is an element of length along the wire.
Equations (3.150) and (3.151) can be combined to give
B(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
I(r
) ∧ (r −r
)
[r −r
[
3
dl, (3.152)
which is the form in which the BiotSavart law is most usually written. This
dl
r  r
I( r )
measurement
point
current
/
/
law is to magnetostatics (i.e., the study of magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady
currents) what Coulomb’s law is to electrostatics (i.e., the study of electric ﬁelds
generated by stationary charges). Furthermore, it can be experimentally veriﬁed
given a set of currents, a compass, a test wire, and a great deal of skill and
patience. This justiﬁes our earlier assumption that the ﬁeld equations (3.105) are
valid for general current distributions (recall that we derived them by studying
93
the ﬁelds generated by inﬁnite, straight wires). Note that both Coulomb’s law
and the BiotSavart law are “gauge independent”; i.e., they do not depend on
the particular choice of gauge.
Consider (for the last time!) an inﬁnite, straight wire directed along the z
axis and carrying a current I. Let us reconstruct the magnetic ﬁeld generated by
P
r  r
/
dl
I
>
( r  r )
/
z
θ
ρ
l
I
the wire at point P using the BiotSavart law. Suppose that the perpendicular
distance to the wire is ρ. It is easily seen that
I ∧ (r −r
) = Iρ
ˆ
θ,
l = ρ tanθ,
dl =
ρ
cos
2
θ
dθ, (3.153)
[r −r
[ =
ρ
cos θ
.
Thus, according to Eq. (3.152) we have
B
θ
=
µ
0
4π
_
π/2
−π/2
Iρ
ρ
3
(cos θ)
−3
ρ
cos
2
θ
dθ
94
=
µ
0
I
4πρ
_
π/2
−π/2
cos θ dθ =
µ
0
I
4πρ
[sinθ]
π/2
−π/2
, (3.154)
which gives the familiar result
B
θ
=
µ
0
I
2πρ
. (3.155)
So, we have come full circle in our investigation of magnetic ﬁelds. Note that
the simple result (3.155) can only be obtained from the BiotSavart law after
some nontrivial algebra. Examination of more complicated current distributions
using this law invariably leads to lengthy, involved, and extremely unpleasant
calculations.
3.13 Electrostatics and magnetostatics
We have now completed our theoretical investigation of electrostatics and mag
netostatics. Our next task is to incorporate time variation into our analysis.
However, before we start this let us brieﬂy review our progress so far. We have
found that the electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charges and the magnetic
ﬁelds generated by steady currents are describable in terms of four ﬁeld equa
tions:
∇ E =
ρ
0
, (3.156a)
∇∧ E = 0, (3.156b)
∇ B = 0, (3.156c)
∇∧ B = µ
0
j. (3.156d)
The boundary conditions are that the ﬁelds are zero at inﬁnity, assuming that the
generating charges and currents are localized to some region in space. According
to Helmholtz’s theorem the above ﬁeld equations, plus the boundary conditions,
are suﬃcient to uniquely specify the electric and magnetic ﬁelds. The physical
signiﬁcance of this is that divergence and curl are the only rotationally invariant
diﬀerential properties of a general vector ﬁeld; i.e., the only quantities which
do not change when the axes are rotated. Since physics does not depend on the
95
orientation of the axes (which is, after all, quite arbitrary) divergence and curl are
the only quantities which can appear in ﬁeld equations which claim to describe
physical phenomena.
The ﬁeld equations can be integrated to give:
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ dV, (3.157a)
_
C
E dl = 0, (3.157b)
_
S
B dS = 0, (3.157c)
_
C
B dl = µ
0
_
S
j dS. (3.157d)
Here, S is a closed surface enclosing a volume V . Also, C is a closed loop, and S
is some surface attached to this loop. The ﬁeld equations (3.156) can be deduced
from Eqs. (3.157) using Gauss’ theorem and Stokes’ theorem. Equation (3.157a)
is called Gauss’ law and says that the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld out of a closed
surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge. Equation (3.157c) has no
particular name and says that there are no such things as magnetic monopoles.
Equation (3.157d) is called Amp`ere’s law and says that the line integral of the
magnetic ﬁeld around any closed loop is proportional to the ﬂux of the current
through the loop. Equations (3.157b) and (3.157d) are incomplete; each acquires
an extra term on the righthand side in time dependent situations.
The ﬁeld equation (3.156b) is automatically satisﬁed if we write
E = −∇φ. (3.158)
Likewise, the ﬁeld equation (3.156c) is automatically satisﬁed if we write
B = ∇∧ A. (3.159)
Here, φ is the electric scalar potential and A is the magnetic vector potential.
The electric ﬁeld is clearly unchanged if we add a constant to the scalar potential:
E →E as φ →φ +c. (3.160)
96
The magnetic ﬁeld is similarly unchanged if we add the gradient of a scalar ﬁeld
to the vector potential:
B →B as A →A+∇ψ. (3.161)
The above transformations, which leave the E and B ﬁelds invariant, are called
gauge transformations. We are free to choose c and ψ to be whatever we like;
i.e., we are free to choose the gauge. The most sensible gauge is the one which
make our equations as simple and symmetric as possible. This corresponds to
the choice
φ(r) →0 as [r[ →∞, (3.162)
and
∇ A = 0. (3.163)
The latter convention is known as the Coulomb gauge.
Taking the divergence of Eq. (3.158) and the curl of Eq. (3.159), and making
use of the Coulomb gauge, we ﬁnd that the four ﬁeld equations (3.156) can be
reduced to Poisson’s equation written four times over:
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
, (3.164a)
∇
2
A = −µ
0
j. (3.164b)
Poisson’s equation is just about the simplest rotationally invariant partial dif
ferential equation it is possible to write. Note that ∇
2
is clearly rotationally
invariant since it is the divergence of a gradient, and both divergence and gradi
ent are rotationally invariant. We can always construct the solution to Poisson’s
equation, given the boundary conditions. Furthermore, we have a uniqueness the
orem which tells us that our solution is the only possible solution. Physically, this
means that there is only one electric and magnetic ﬁeld which is consistent with
a given set of stationary charges and steady currents. This sounds like an obvi
ous, almost trivial, statement. But there are many areas of physics (for instance,
ﬂuid mechanics and plasma physics) where we also believe, for physical reasons,
that for a given set of boundary conditions the solution should be unique. The
problem is that in most cases when we reduce the problem to a partial diﬀerential
97
equation we end up with something far nastier than Poisson’s equation. In gen
eral, we cannot solve this equation. In fact, we usually cannot even prove that it
possess a solution for general boundary conditions, let alone that the solution is
unique. So, we are very fortunate indeed that in electrostatics and magnetostat
ics the problem boils down to solving a nice partial diﬀerential equation. When
you hear people say things like “electromagnetism is the best understood theory
in physics” what they are really saying is that the partial diﬀerential equations
which crop up in this theory are soluble and have nice properties.
Poisson’s equation
∇
2
u = v (3.165)
is linear, which means that its solutions are superposable. We can exploit this
fact to construct a general solution to this equation. Suppose that we can ﬁnd
the solution to
∇
2
G(r, r
) = δ(r −r
) (3.166)
which satisﬁes the boundary conditions. This is the solution driven by a unit
amplitude point source located at position vector r
. Since any general source
can be built up out of a weighted sum of point sources it follows that a general
solution to Poisson’s equation can be built up out of a weighted superposition of
point source solutions. Mathematically, we can write
u(r) =
_
G(r, r
) v(r
) d
3
r
. (3.167)
The function G is called the Green’s function. The Green’s function for Poisson’s
equation is
G(r, r
) = −
1
4π
1
[r −r
[
. (3.168)
Note that this Green’s function is proportional to the scalar potential of a point
charge located at r
; this is hardly surprising given the deﬁnition of a Green’s
function and Eq. (3.164a).
According to Eqs. (3.164), (3.165), (3.167), and (3.168), the scalar and vector
potentials generated by a set of stationary charges and steady currents take the
98
form
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.169a)
A(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.169b)
Making use of Eqs. (3.158) and (3.159) we obtain the fundamental force laws for
electric and magnetic ﬁelds. Coulomb’s law
E(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
r −r
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
, (3.170)
and the BiotSavart law
B(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
) ∧ (r −r
)
[r −r
[
3
d
3
r
. (3.171)
Of course, both of these laws are examples of action at a distance laws and,
therefore, violate relativity. However, this is not a problem as long as we restrict
ourselves to ﬁelds generated by time independent charge and current distribu
tions.
The question, now, is how badly is this scheme we have just worked out
going to be disrupted when we take time variation into account. The answer,
somewhat surprisingly, is by very little indeed. So, in Eqs. (3.156)–(3.171) we can
already discern the basic outline of classical electromagnetism. Let us continue
our investigation.
3.14 Faraday’s law
The history of mankind’s development of physics is really the history of the
synthesis of ideas. Physicists keep ﬁnding that apparently disparate phenomena
can be understood as diﬀerent aspects of some more fundamental phenomenon.
This process has continued until today all physical phenomena can be described
in terms of three fundamental forces: gravity, the electroweak force, and the
99
strong force. One of the main goals of modern physics is to ﬁnd some way of
combining these three forces so that all of physics can be described in terms of a
single uniﬁed force. This, essentially, is the purpose of supersymmetry theories.
The ﬁrst great synthesis of ideas in physics took place in 1666 when Issac
Newton realised that the force which causes apples to fall downwards is the same
as the force which maintains the planets in elliptical orbits around the Sun. The
second great synthesis, which we are about to study in more detail, took place
in 1830 when Michael Faraday discovered that electricity and magnetism are two
aspects of the same thing, usually referred to as “electromagnetism.” The third
great synthesis, which we shall discuss presently, took place in 1873 when James
Clerk Maxwell demonstrated that light and electromagnetism are intimately re
lated. The last (but, hopefully, not the ﬁnal) great synthesis took place in 1967
when Steve Weinberg and Abdus Salam showed that the electromagnetic force
and the weak nuclear force (i.e., the one which is responsible for β decays) can
be combined to give the electroweak force. Unfortunately, Weinberg’s work lies
beyond the scope of this lecture course.
Let us now consider Faraday’s experiments, having put them in their proper
historical context. Prior to 1830 the only known way to make an electric current
ﬂow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the posi
tive and negative terminals of a battery. We measure a battery’s ability to push
current down a wire in terms of its “voltage,” by which we mean the voltage diﬀer
ence between its positive and negative terminals. What does voltage correspond
to in physics? Well, volts are the units used to measure electric scalar potential,
so when we talk about a 6V battery what we are really saying is that the diﬀer
ence in electric scalar potential between its positive and negative terminals is six
volts. This insight allows us to write
V = φ(⊕) −φ(¸) = −
_
⊕
∇φ dl =
_
⊕
E dl, (3.172)
where V is the battery voltage, ⊕ denotes the positive terminal, ¸ the negative
terminal, and dl is an element of length along the wire. Of course, the above
equation is a direct consequence of E = −∇φ. Clearly, a voltage diﬀerence
between two ends of a wire attached to a battery implies the presence of an
electric ﬁeld which pushes charges through the wire. This ﬁeld is directed from
100
the positive terminal of the battery to the negative terminal and is, therefore, such
as to force electrons to ﬂow through the wire from the negative to the positive
terminal. As expected, this means that a net positive current ﬂows from the
positive to the negative terminal. The fact that E is a conservative ﬁeld ensures
that the voltage diﬀerence V is independent of the path of the wire. In other
words, two diﬀerent wires attached to the same battery develop identical voltage
diﬀerences. This is just as well. The quantity V is usually called the electromotive
force, or e.m.f. for short. “Electromotive force” is a bit of a misnomer. The e.m.f.
is certainly what causes current to ﬂow through a wire, so it is electromotive (i.e.,
it causes electrons to move), but it is not a force. In fact, it is a diﬀerence in
electric scalar potential.
Let us now consider a closed loop of wire (with no battery). The electromotive
force around such a loop is
V =
_
E dl = 0. (3.173)
This is a direct consequence of the ﬁeld equation ∇ ∧ E = 0. So, since E is
a conservative ﬁeld then the electromotive force around a closed loop of wire is
automatically zero and no current ﬂows around the wire. This all seems to make
sense. However, Michael Faraday is about to throw a spanner in our works! He
discovered in 1830 that a changing magnetic ﬁeld can cause a current to ﬂow
around a closed loop of wire (in the absence of a battery). Well, if current ﬂows
through a wire then there must be an electromotive force. So,
V =
_
E dl ,= 0, (3.174)
which immediately implies that E is not a conservative ﬁeld, and that ∇∧E ,= 0.
Clearly, we are going to have to modify some of our ideas regarding electric ﬁelds!
Faraday continued his experiments and found that another way of generating
an electromotive force around a loop of wire is to keep the magnetic ﬁeld constant
and move the loop. Eventually, Faraday was able to formulate a law which
accounted for all of his experiments. The e.m.f. generated around a loop of wire
in a magnetic ﬁeld is proportional to the rate of change of the ﬂux of the magnetic
ﬁeld through the loop. So, if the loop is denoted C and S is some surface attached
101
to the loop then Faraday’s experiments can be summed up by writing
V =
_
C
E dl = A
∂
∂t
_
S
B dS, (3.175)
where A is a constant of proportionality. Thus, the changing ﬂux of the magnetic
ﬁeld through the loop creates an electric ﬁeld directed around the loop. This
process is know as “magnetic induction.”
S.I. units have been carefully chosen so as to make [A[ = 1 in the above
equation. The only thing we now have to decide is whether A = +1 or A = −1.
In other words, which way around the loop does the induced e.m.f. want to drive
the current? We possess a general principle which allows us to decide questions
like this. It is called Le Chatelier’s principle. According to Le Chatelier’s principle
every change generates a reaction which tries to minimize the change. Essentially,
this means that the universe is stable to small perturbations. When this principle
is applied to the special case of magnetic induction it is usually called Lenz’s law.
According to Lenz’s law, the current induced around a closed loop is always such
that the magnetic ﬁeld it produces tries to counteract the change in magnetic ﬂux
which generates the electromotive force. From the diagram, it is clear that if the
B
I
C
B
/
magnetic ﬁeld B is increasing and the current I circulates clockwise (as seen from
above) then it generates a ﬁeld B
which opposes the increase in magnetic ﬂux
through the loop, in accordance with Lenz’s law. The direction of the current is
102
opposite to the sense of the current loop C (assuming that the ﬂux of B through
the loop is positive), so this implies that A = −1 in Eq. (3.175). Thus, Faraday’s
law takes the form
_
C
E dl = −
∂
∂t
_
S
B dS. (3.176)
Experimentally, Faraday’s law is found to correctly predict the e.m.f. (i.e.,
_
Edl)
generated in any wire loop, irrespective of the position or shape of the loop. It
is reasonable to assume that the same e.m.f. would be generated in the absence
of the wire (of course, no current would ﬂow in this case). Thus, Eq. (3.176) is
valid for any closed loop C. If Faraday’s law is to make any sense it must also be
true for any surface S attached to the loop C. Clearly, if the ﬂux of the magnetic
ﬁeld through the loop depends on the surface upon which it is evaluated then
Faraday’s law is going to predict diﬀerent e.m.f.s for diﬀerent surfaces. Since
there is no preferred surface for a general noncoplanar loop, this would not make
very much sense. The condition for the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld,
_
S
B dS, to
depend only on the loop C to which the surface S is attached, and not on the
nature of the surface itself, is
_
S
B dS
= 0, (3.177)
for any closed surface S
.
Faraday’s law, Eq. (3.176), can be converted into a ﬁeld equation using Stokes’
theorem. We obtain
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
. (3.178)
This is the ﬁnal Maxwell equation. It describes how a changing magnetic ﬁeld
can generate, or induce, an electric ﬁeld. Gauss’ theorem applied to Eq. (3.177)
yields the familiar ﬁeld equation
∇ B = 0. (3.179)
This ensures that the magnetic ﬂux through a loop is a well deﬁned quantity.
The divergence of Eq. (3.178) yields
∂ ∇ B
∂t
= 0. (3.180)
103
Thus, the ﬁeld equation (3.178) actually demands that the divergence of the
magnetic ﬁeld be constant in time for selfconsistency (this means that the ﬂux
of the magnetic ﬁeld through a loop need not be a well deﬁned quantity as long as
its time derivative is well deﬁned). However, a constant nonsolenoidal magnetic
ﬁeld can only be generated by magnetic monopoles, and magnetic monopoles do
not exist (as far as we are aware). Hence, ∇ B = 0. The absence of magnetic
monopoles is an observational fact, it cannot be predicted by any theory. If
magnetic monopoles were discovered tomorrow this would not cause physicists
any problems. We know how to generalize Maxwell’s equations to include both
magnetic monopoles and currents of magnetic monopoles. In this generalized
formalism Maxwell’s equations are completely symmetric with respect to electric
and magnetic ﬁelds, and ∇B ,= 0. However, an extra term (involving the current
of magnetic monopoles) must be added to the righthand side of Eq. (3.178) in
order to make it selfconsistent.
3.15 Electric scalar potential?
We now have a problem. We can only write the electric ﬁeld in terms of a scalar
potential (i.e., E = −∇φ) provided that ∇∧E = 0. However, we have just found
that in the presence of a changing magnetic ﬁeld the curl of the electric ﬁeld is
nonzero. In other words, E is not, in general, a conservative ﬁeld. Does this mean
that we have to abandon the concept of electric scalar potential? Fortunately,
no. It is still possible to deﬁne a scalar potential which is physically meaningful.
Let us start from the equation
∇ B = 0, (3.181)
which is valid for both time varying and non time varying magnetic ﬁelds. Since
the magnetic ﬁeld is solenoidal we can write it as the curl of a vector potential:
B = ∇∧ A. (3.182)
So, there is no problem with the vector potential in the presence of time varying
ﬁelds. Let us substitute Eq. (3.182) into the ﬁeld equation (3.178). We obtain
∇∧ E = −
∂ ∇∧ A
∂t
, (3.183)
104
which can be written
∇∧
_
E +
∂A
∂t
_
= 0. (3.184)
We know that a curl free vector ﬁeld can always be expressed as the gradient of
a scalar potential, so let us write
E +
∂A
∂t
= −∇φ, (3.185)
or
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
. (3.186)
This is a very nice equation! It tells us that the scalar potential φ only describes
the conservative electric ﬁeld generated by electric charges. The electric ﬁeld
induced by time varying magnetic ﬁelds is nonconservative, and is described by
the magnetic vector potential.
3.16 Gauge transformations
Electric and magnetic ﬁelds can be written in terms of scalar and vector poten
tials, as follows:
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
,
B = ∇∧ A. (3.187)
However, this prescription is not unique. There are many diﬀerent potentials
which generate the same ﬁelds. We have come across this problem before. It
is called gauge invariance. The most general transformation which leaves the E
and B ﬁelds unchanged in Eqs. (3.187) is
φ → φ +
∂ψ
∂t
,
A → A−∇ψ. (3.188)
105
This is clearly a generalization of the gauge transformation which we found earlier
for static ﬁelds:
φ → φ +c,
A → A−∇ψ, (3.189)
where c is a constant. In fact, if ψ(r, t) →ψ(r) +c t then Eqs. (3.188) reduce to
Eqs. (3.189).
We are free to choose the gauge so as to make our equations as simple as
possible. As before, the most sensible gauge for the scalar potential is to make it
go to zero at inﬁnity:
φ(r) →0 as [r[ →∞. (3.190)
For steady ﬁelds we found that the optimum gauge for the vector potential was
the so called Coulomb gauge:
∇ A = 0. (3.191)
We can still use this gauge for nonsteady ﬁelds. The argument which we gave
earlier (see Section 3.11), that it is always possible to transform away the di
vergence of a vector potential, remains valid. One of the nice features of the
Coulomb gauge is that when we write the electric ﬁeld,
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
, (3.192)
we ﬁnd that the part which is generated by charges (i.e., the ﬁrst term on the
righthand side) is conservative and the part induced by magnetic ﬁelds (i.e.,
the second term on the righthand side) is purely solenoidal. Earlier on, we
proved mathematically that a general vector ﬁeld can be written as the sum of
a conservative ﬁeld and a solenoidal ﬁeld (see Section 3.10). Now we are ﬁnding
that when we split up the electric ﬁeld in this manner the two ﬁelds have diﬀerent
physical origins: the conservative part of the ﬁeld emanates from electric charges
whereas the solenoidal part is induced by magnetic ﬁelds.
Equation (3.192) can be combined with the ﬁeld equation
∇ E =
ρ
0
(3.193)
106
(which remains valid for nonsteady ﬁelds) to give
−∇
2
φ −
∂ ∇ A
∂t
=
ρ
0
. (3.194)
With the Coulomb gauge condition, ∇ A = 0, the above expression reduces to
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
, (3.195)
which is just Poisson’s equation. Thus, we can immediately write down an ex
pression for the scalar potential generated by nonsteady ﬁelds. It is exactly the
same as our previous expression for the scalar potential generated by steady ﬁelds,
namely
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
, t)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.196)
However, this apparently simple result is extremely deceptive. Equation (3.196)
is a typical action at a distance law. If the charge density changes suddenly at
r
then the potential at r responds immediately. However, we shall see later that
the full time dependent Maxwell’s equations only allow information to propagate
at the speed of light (i.e., they do not violate relativity). How can these two
statements be reconciled? The crucial point is that the scalar potential cannot
be measured directly, it can only be inferred from the electric ﬁeld. In the time
dependent case there are two parts to the electric ﬁeld; that part which comes
from the scalar potential, and that part which comes from the vector potential [see
Eq. (3.192) ]. So, if the scalar potential responds immediately to some distance
rearrangement of charge density it does not necessarily follow that the electric
ﬁeld also has an immediate response. What actually happens is that the change in
the part of the electric ﬁeld which comes from the scalar potential is balanced by
an equal and opposite change in the part which comes from the vector potential,
so that the overall electric ﬁeld remains unchanged. This state of aﬀairs persists
at least until suﬃcient time has elapsed for a light ray to travel from the distant
charges to the region in question. Thus, relativity is not violated since it is
the electric ﬁeld, and not the scalar potential, which carries physically accessible
information.
It is clear that the apparent action at a distance nature of Eq. (3.196) is
highly misleading. This suggests, very strongly, that the Coulomb gauge is not
107
the optimum gauge in the time dependent case. A more sensible choice is the so
called “Lorentz gauge”:
∇ A = −
0
µ
0
∂φ
∂t
. (3.197)
It can be shown, by analogy with earlier arguments (see Section 3.11), that it is
always possible to make a gauge transformation, at a given instance in time, such
that the above equation is satisﬁed. Substituting the Lorentz gauge condition
into Eq. (3.194), we obtain
0
µ
0
∂
2
φ
∂t
2
−∇
2
φ =
ρ
0
. (3.198)
It turns out that this is a three dimensional wave equation in which information
propagates at the speed of light. But, more of this later. Note that the magneti
cally induced part of the electric ﬁeld (i.e., −∂A/∂t) is not purely solenoidal in
the Lorentz gauge. This is a slight disadvantage of the Lorentz gauge with respect
to the Coulomb gauge. However, this disadvantage is more than oﬀset by other
advantages which will become apparent presently. Incidentally, the fact that the
part of the electric ﬁeld which we ascribe to magnetic induction changes when
we change the gauge suggests that the separation of the ﬁeld into magnetically
induced and charge induced components is not unique in the general time varying
case (i.e., it is a convention).
3.17 The displacement current
Michael Faraday revolutionized physics in 1830 by showing that electricity and
magnetism were interrelated phenomena. He achieved this breakthrough by care
ful experimentation. Between 1864 and 1873 James Clerk Maxwell achieved a
similar breakthrough by pure thought. Of course, this was only possible because
he was able to take the experimental results of Faraday, Amp`ere, etc., as his start
ing point. Prior to 1864 the laws of electromagnetism were written in integral
form. Thus, Gauss’s law was (in S.I. units) the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld through
a closed surface equals the total enclosed charge divided by
0
. The no magnetic
monopole law was the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through any closed surface is zero.
Faraday’s law was the electromotive force generated around a closed loop equals
108
minus the rate of change of the magnetic ﬂux through the loop. Finally, Amp`ere’s
law was the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around a closed loop equals the total
current ﬂowing through the loop times µ
0
. Maxwell’s ﬁrst great achievement was
to realize that these laws could be expressed as a set of partial diﬀerential equa
tions. Of course, he wrote his equations out in component form because modern
vector notation did not come into vogue until about the time of the First World
War. In modern notation, Maxwell ﬁrst wrote
∇ E =
ρ
0
, (3.199a)
∇ B = 0, (3.199b)
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
, (3.199c)
∇∧ B = µ
0
j. (3.199d)
Maxwell’s second great achievement was to realize that these equations are wrong.
We can see that there is something slightly unusual about Eqs. (3.199). They
are very unfair to electric ﬁelds! After all, time varying magnetic ﬁelds can induce
electric ﬁelds, but electric ﬁelds apparently cannot aﬀect magnetic ﬁelds in any
way. However, there is a far more serious problem associated with the above
equations, which we alluded to earlier on. Consider the integral form of the last
Maxwell equation (i.e., Amp`ere’s law)
_
C
B dl = µ
0
_
S
j dS. (3.200)
This says that the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around a closed loop C is
equal to µ
0
times the ﬂux of the current density through the loop. The problem
is that the ﬂux of the current density through a loop is not, in general, a well
deﬁned quantity. In order for the ﬂux to be well deﬁned the integral of j dS over
some surface S attached to a loop C must depend on C but not on the details of
S. This is only the case if
∇ j = 0. (3.201)
Unfortunately, the above condition is only satisﬁed for non time varying ﬁelds.
109
Why do we say that, in general, ∇ j ,= 0? Well, consider the ﬂux of j over
some closed surface S enclosing a volume V . This is clearly equivalent to the
rate at which charge ﬂows through S. However, if charge is a conserved quantity
(and we certainly believe that it is) then the rate at which charge ﬂows through
S must equal the rate of decrease of the charge contained in volume V . Thus,
_
S
j dS = −
∂
∂t
_
V
ρ dV. (3.202)
Making use of Gauss’ theorem, this yields
∇ j = −
∂ρ
∂t
. (3.203)
Thus, ∇ j = 0 is only true in a steady state (i.e., when ∂/∂t ≡ 0).
The problem with Amp`ere’s law is well illustrated by the following very famous
example. Consider a long straight wire interrupted by a parallel plate capacitor.
Suppose that C is some loop which circles the wire. In the non time dependent
situation the capacitor acts like a break in the wire, so no current ﬂows, and no
magnetic ﬁeld is generated. There is clearly no problem with Amp`ere’s law in this
case. In the time dependent situation a transient current ﬂows in the wire as the
capacitor charges up, or charges down, so a transient magnetic ﬁeld is generated.
Thus, the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around C is (transiently) nonzero.
According to Amp`ere’s law, the ﬂux of the current through any surface attached
to C should also be (transiently) nonzero. Let us consider two such surfaces.
The ﬁrst surface, S
1
, intersects the wire. This surface causes us no problem since
the ﬂux of j though the surface is clearly nonzero (because it intersects a current
carrying wire). The second surface, S
2
, passes between the plates of the capacitor
and, therefore, does not intersect the wire at all. Clearly, the ﬂux of the current
through this surface is zero. The current ﬂuxes through surfaces S
1
and S
2
are
obviously diﬀerent. However, both surfaces are attached to the same loop C, so
the ﬂuxes should be the same according to Amp`ere’s law. It would appear that
Amp`ere’s law is about to disintegrate! However, we notice that although the
surface S
2
does not intersect any electric current it does pass through a region
of strong changing electric ﬁeld as it threads between the plates of the charging
(or discharging) capacitor. Perhaps, if we add a term involving ∂E/∂t to the
110
righthand side of Eq. (3.199d) we can somehow ﬁx up Amp`ere’s law? This is,
essentially, how Maxwell reasoned more than one hundred years ago.
Let us try out this scheme. Suppose that we write
∇∧ B = µ
0
j +λ
∂E
∂t
(3.204)
instead of Eq. (3.199d). Here, λ is some constant. Does this resolve our problem?
We want the ﬂux of the righthand side of the above equation through some loop
C to be well deﬁned; i.e., it should only depend on C and not the particular
surface S (which spans C) upon which it is evaluated. This is another way of
saying that we want the divergence of the righthand side to be zero. In fact,
we can see that this is necessary for self consistency since the divergence of the
lefthand side is automatically zero. So, taking the divergence of Eq. (3.204) we
obtain
0 = µ
0
∇ j +λ
∂ ∇ E
∂t
. (3.205)
But, we know that
∇ E =
ρ
0
, (3.206)
so combining the previous two equations we arrive at
µ
0
∇ j +
λ
0
∂ρ
∂t
= 0. (3.207)
Now, our charge conservation law (3.203) can be written
∇ j +
∂ρ
∂t
= 0. (3.208)
The previous two equations are in agreement provided λ =
0
µ
0
. So, if we modify
the ﬁnal Maxwell equation such that it reads
∇∧ B = µ
0
j +
0
µ
0
∂E
∂t
(3.209)
then we ﬁnd that the divergence of the righthand side is zero as a consequence
of charge conservation. The extra term is called the “displacement current” (this
111
name was invented by Maxwell). In summary, we have shown that although the
ﬂux of the real current through a loop is not well deﬁned, if we form the sum of
the real current and the displacement current then the ﬂux of this new quantity
through a loop is well deﬁned.
Of course, the displacement current is not a current at all. It is, in fact,
associated with the generation of magnetic ﬁelds by time varying electric ﬁelds.
Maxwell came up with this rather curious name because many of his ideas regard
ing electric and magnetic ﬁelds were completely wrong. For instance, Maxwell
believed in the æther, and he thought that electric and magnetic ﬁelds were some
sort of stresses in this medium. He also thought that the displacement current was
associated with displacements of the æther (hence, the name). The reason that
these misconceptions did not invalidate his equations is quite simple. Maxwell
based his equations on the results of experiments, and he added in his extra term
so as to make these equations mathematically self consistent. Both of these steps
are valid irrespective of the existence or nonexistence of the æther.
“But, hang on a minute,” you might say, “you can’t go around adding terms to
laws of physics just because you feel like it! The ﬁeld equations (3.199) are derived
directly from the results of famous nineteenth century experiments. If there is a
new term involving the time derivative of the electric ﬁeld which needs to be added
into these equations, how come there is no corresponding nineteenth century
experiment which demonstrates this? We have Amp`ere’s law which shows that
changing magnetic ﬁelds generate electric ﬁelds. Why is there no “Joe Blogg’s”
law that says that changing electric ﬁelds generate magnetic ﬁelds?” This is a
perfectly reasonable question. The answer is that the new term describes an eﬀect
which is far too small to have been observed in nineteenth century experiments.
Let us demonstrate this.
First, we shall show that it is comparatively easy to detect the induction of
an electric ﬁeld by a changing magnetic ﬁeld in a desktop laboratory experiment.
The Earth’s magnetic ﬁeld is about 1 gauss (that is, 10
−4
tesla). Magnetic
ﬁelds generated by electromagnets (which will ﬁt on a laboratory desktop) are
typically about one hundred times bigger that this. Let us, therefore, consider
a hypothetical experiment in which a 100 gauss magnetic ﬁeld is switched on
suddenly. Suppose that the ﬁeld ramps up in one tenth of a second. What
112
electromotive force is generated in a 10 centimeter square loop of wire located in
this ﬁeld? Amp`ere’s law is written
V = −
∂
∂t
_
B dS ∼
BA
t
, (3.210)
where B = 0.01 tesla is the ﬁeld strength, A = 0.01 m
2
is the area of the loop,
and t = 0.1 seconds is the ramp time. It follows that V ∼ 1 millivolt. Well, one
millivolt is easily detectable. In fact, most handheld laboratory voltmeters are
calibrated in millivolts. It is clear that we would have no diﬃculty whatsoever
detecting the magnetic induction of electric ﬁelds in a nineteenth century style
laboratory experiment.
Let us now consider the electric induction of magnetic ﬁelds. Suppose that our
electric ﬁeld is generated by a parallel plate capacitor of spacing one centimeter
which is charged up to 100 volts. This gives a ﬁeld of 10
4
volts per meter.
Suppose, further, that the capacitor is discharged in one tenth of a second. The
law of electric induction is obtained by integrating Eq. (3.209) and neglecting the
ﬁrst term on the righthand side. Thus,
_
B dl =
0
µ
0
∂
∂t
_
E dS. (3.211)
Let us consider a loop 10 centimeters square. What is the magnetic ﬁeld gen
erated around this loop (we could try to measure this with a Hall probe). Very
approximately we ﬁnd that
lB ∼
0
µ
0
El
2
t
, (3.212)
where l = 0.1 meters is the dimensions of the loop, B is the magnetic ﬁeld
strength, E = 10
4
volts per meter is the electric ﬁeld, and t = 0.1 seconds is the
decay time of the ﬁeld. We ﬁnd that B ∼ 10
−9
gauss. Modern technology is
unable to detect such a small magnetic ﬁeld, so we cannot really blame Faraday
for not noticing electric induction in 1830.
“So,” you might say, “why did you bother mentioning this displacement cur
rent thing in the ﬁrst place if it is undetectable?” Again, a perfectly fair question.
The answer is that the displacement current is detectable in some experiments.
113
Suppose that we take an FM radio signal, amplify it so that its peak voltage is
one hundred volts, and then apply it to the parallel plate capacitor in the previous
hypothetical experiment. What size of magnetic ﬁeld would this generate? Well,
a typical FM signal oscillates at 10
9
Hz, so t in the previous example changes
from 0.1 seconds to 10
−9
seconds. Thus, the induced magnetic ﬁeld is about
10
−1
gauss. This is certainly detectable by modern technology. So, it would
seem that if the electric ﬁeld is oscillating fast then electric induction of magnetic
ﬁelds is an observable eﬀect. In fact, there is a virtually infallible rule for de
ciding whether or not the displacement current can be neglected in Eq. (3.209).
If electromagnetic radiation is important then the displacement current must be
included. On the other hand, if electromagnetic radiation is unimportant then
the displacement current can be safely neglected. Clearly, Maxwell’s inclusion of
the displacement current in Eq. (3.209) was a vital step in his later realization
that his equations allowed propagating wavelike solutions. These solutions are,
of course, electromagnetic waves. But, more of this later.
We are now in a position to write out Maxwell’s equations in all their glory!
We get
∇ E =
ρ
0
, (3.213a)
∇ B = 0, (3.213b)
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
, (3.213c)
∇∧ B = µ
0
j +
0
µ
0
∂E
∂t
. (3.213d)
These four partial diﬀerential equations constitute a complete description of the
behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds. The ﬁrst equation describes how electric
ﬁelds are induced by charges. The second equation says that there is no such thing
as a magnetic charge. The third equation describes the induction of electric ﬁelds
by changing magnetic ﬁelds, and the fourth equation describes the generation
of magnetic ﬁelds by electric currents and the induction of magnetic ﬁelds by
changing electric ﬁelds. Note that with the inclusion of the displacement current
these equations treat electric and magnetic ﬁelds on an equal footing; i.e., electric
ﬁelds can induce magnetic ﬁelds, and vice versa. Equations (3.213) sum up the
114
experimental results of Coulomb, Amp`ere, and Faraday very succinctly; they are
called Maxwell’s equations because James Clerk Maxwell was the ﬁrst to write
them down (in component form). Maxwell also ﬁxed them up so that they made
mathematical sense.
3.18 The potential formulation of Maxwell’s equations
We have seen that Eqs. (3.213b) and (3.213c) are automatically satisﬁed if we
write the electric and magnetic ﬁelds in terms of potentials:
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
,
B = ∇∧ A. (3.214)
This prescription is not unique, but we can make it unique by adopting the
following conventions:
φ(r) → 0 as [r[ →∞, (3.215a)
∇ A = −
0
µ
0
∂φ
∂t
. (3.215b)
The above equations can be combined with Eq. (3.213a) to give
0
µ
0
∂
2
φ
∂t
2
−∇
2
φ =
ρ
0
. (3.216)
Let us now consider Eq. (3.213d). Substitution of Eqs. (3.214) into this for
mula yields
∇∧ ∇∧ A ≡ ∇(∇ A) −∇
2
A = µ
0
j −
0
µ
0
∂ ∇φ
∂t
−
0
µ
0
∂
2
A
∂t
2
, (3.217)
or
0
µ
0
∂
2
A
∂t
2
−∇
2
A = µ
0
j −∇
_
∇ A+
0
µ
0
∂φ
∂t
_
. (3.218)
115
We can now see quite clearly where the Lorentz gauge condition (3.215b) comes
from. The above equation is, in general, very complicated since it involves both
the vector and scalar potentials. But, if we adopt the Lorentz gauge then the last
term on the righthand side becomes zero and the equation simpliﬁes consider
ably so that it only involves the vector potential. Thus, we ﬁnd that Maxwell’s
equations reduce to the following:
0
µ
0
∂
2
φ
∂t
2
−∇
2
φ =
ρ
0
,
0
µ
0
∂
2
A
∂t
2
−∇
2
A = µ
0
j. (3.219)
This is the same equation written four times over. In steady state (i.e., ∂/∂t = 0)
it reduces to Poisson’s equation, which we know how to solve. With the ∂/∂t
terms included it becomes a slightly more complicated equation (in fact, a driven
three dimensional wave equation).
3.19 Electromagnetic waves
This is an appropriate point at which to demonstrate that Maxwell’s equations
possess propagating wavelike solutions. Let us start from Maxwell’s equations
in free space (i.e., with no charges and no currents):
∇ E = 0, (3.220a)
∇ B = 0, (3.220b)
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
, (3.220c)
∇∧ B =
0
µ
0
∂E
∂t
. (3.220d)
Note that these equations exhibit a nice symmetry between the electric and mag
netic ﬁelds.
There is an easy way to show that the above equations possess wavelike
solutions, and a hard way. The easy way is to assume that the solutions are going
116
to be wavelike beforehand. Speciﬁcally, let us search for plane wave solutions of
the form:
E(r, t) = E
0
cos (k r −ωt),
B(r, t) = B
0
cos (k r −ωt +φ). (3.221)
Here, E
0
and B
0
are constant vectors, k is called the wavevector, and ω is the
angular frequency. The frequency in hertz is related to the angular frequency
via ω = 2π f. The frequency is conventionally deﬁned to be positive. The
quantity φ is a phase diﬀerence between the electric and magnetic ﬁelds. It
is more convenient to write
E = E
0
e
i(k·r−ωt)
,
B = B
0
e
i(k·r−ωt)
, (3.222)
where by convention the physical solution is the real part of the above equations.
The phase diﬀerence φ is absorbed into the constant vector B
0
by allowing it to
become complex. Thus, B
0
→B
0
e
i φ
. In general, the vector E
0
is also complex.
A wave maximum of the electric ﬁeld satisﬁes
k r = ωt +n2π +φ, (3.223)
where n is an integer and φ is some phase angle. The solution to this equation
is a set of equally spaced parallel planes (one plane for each possible value of n)
whose normals lie in the direction of the wave vector k and which propagate in
this direction with velocity
v =
ω
k
. (3.224)
The spacing between adjacent planes (i.e., the wavelength) is given by
λ =
2π
k
. (3.225)
Consider a general plane wave vector ﬁeld
A = A
0
e
i(k·r−ωt)
. (3.226)
117
k
v
λ
What is the divergence of A? This is easy to evaluate. We have
∇ A =
∂A
x
∂x
+
∂A
y
∂y
+
∂A
z
∂z
= (A
0x
ik
x
+A
0y
ik
y
+A
0z
ik
z
) e
i(k·r−ωt)
= i k A. (3.227)
How about the curl of A? This is slightly more diﬃcult. We have
(∇∧ A)
x
=
∂A
z
∂y
−
∂A
y
∂z
= (i k
y
A
z
−i k
z
A
y
)
= i (k ∧ A)
x
. (3.228)
This is easily generalized to
∇∧ A = i k ∧ A. (3.229)
We can see that vector ﬁeld operations on a plane wave simplify to dot and cross
products involving the wavevector.
The ﬁrst Maxwell equation (3.220a) reduces to
i k E
0
= 0, (3.230)
using the assumed electric and magnetic ﬁelds (3.222), and Eq. (3.227). Thus,
the electric ﬁeld is perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the wave.
118
Likewise, the second Maxwell equation gives
i k B
0
= 0, (3.231)
implying that the magnetic ﬁeld is also perpendicular to the direction of prop
agation. Clearly, the wavelike solutions of Maxwell’s equation are a type of
transverse wave. The third Maxwell equation gives
i k ∧ E
0
= i ωB
0
, (3.232)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.229). Dotting this equation with E
0
yields
E
0
B
0
=
E
0
k ∧ E
0
ω
= 0. (3.233)
Thus, the electric and magnetic ﬁelds are mutually perpendicular. Dotting equa
tion (3.232) with B
0
yields
B
0
k ∧ E
0
= ω B
2
0
> 0. (3.234)
Thus, the vectors E
0
, B
0
, and k are mutually perpendicular and form a right
handed set. The ﬁnal Maxwell equation gives
i k ∧ B
0
= −i
0
µ
0
ωE
0
. (3.235)
Combining this with Eq. (3.232) yields
k ∧ (k ∧ E
0
) = (k E
0
) k −k
2
E
0
= −
0
µ
0
ω
2
E
0
, (3.236)
or
k
2
=
0
µ
0
ω
2
, (3.237)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.230). However, we know from Eq. (3.224)
that the wavevelocity c is related to the magnitude of the wavevector and the
wave frequency via c = ω/k. Thus, we obtain
c =
1
√
0
µ
0
. (3.238)
119
We have found transverse wave solutions of the freespace Maxwell equations,
propagating at some velocity c which is given by a combination of
0
and µ
0
.
The constants
0
and µ
0
are easily measurable. The former is related to the
force acting between electric charges and the latter to the force acting between
electric currents. Both of these constants were fairly well known in Maxwell’s
time. Maxwell, incidentally, was the ﬁrst person to look for wavelike solutions
of his equations and, thus, to derive Eq. (3.238). The modern values of
0
and µ
0
are
0
= 8.8542 10
−12
C
2
N
−1
m
−2
,
µ
0
= 4π 10
−7
NA
−2
. (3.239)
Let us use these values to ﬁnd the propagation velocity of “electromagnetic
waves.” We get
c =
1
√
0
µ
0
= 2.998 10
8
ms
−1
. (3.240)
Of course, we immediately recognize this as the velocity of light. Maxwell also
made this connection back in the 1870’s. He conjectured that light, whose nature
has been previously unknown, was a form of electromagnetic radiation. This
was a remarkable prediction. After all, Maxwell’s equations were derived from
the results of benchtop laboratory experiments involving charges, batteries, coils,
and currents, which apparently had nothing whatsoever to do with light.
Maxwell was able to make another remarkable prediction. The wavelength
of light was well known in the late nineteenth century from studies of diﬀraction
through slits, etc. Visible light actually occupies a surprisingly narrow wavelength
range. The shortest wavelength blue light which is visible has λ = 0.4 microns
(one micron is 10
−6
meters). The longest wavelength red light which is visible
has λ = 0.76 microns. However, there is nothing in our analysis which suggests
that this particular range of wavelengths is special. Electromagnetic waves can
have any wavelength. Maxwell concluded that visible light was a small part of
a vast spectrum of previously undiscovered types of electromagnetic radiation.
Since Maxwell’s time virtually all of the nonvisible parts of the electromagnetic
spectrum have been observed. Table 1 gives a brief guide to the electromagnetic
spectrum. Electromagnetic waves are of particular importance because they are
our only source of information regarding the universe around us. Radio waves and
120
Radiation Type Wavelength Range (m)
Gamma Rays < 10
−11
XRays 10
−11
–10
−9
Ultraviolet 10
−9
–10
−7
Visible 10
−7
–10
−6
Infrared 10
−6
–10
−4
Microwave 10
−4
–10
−1
TVFM 10
−1
–10
1
Radio > 10
1
Table 1: The electromagnetic spectrum
microwaves (which are comparatively hard to scatter) have provided much of our
knowledge about the centre of our own galaxy. This is completely unobservable
in visible light, which is strongly scattered by interstellar gas and dust lying
in the galactic plane. For the same reason, the spiral arms of our galaxy can
only be mapped out using radio waves. Infrared radiation is useful for detecting
protostars which are not yet hot enough to emit visible radiation. Of course,
visible radiation is still the mainstay of astronomy. Satellite based ultraviolet
observations have yielded invaluable insights into the structure and distribution
of distant galaxies. Finally, Xray and γray astronomy usually concentrates on
exotic objects in the Galaxy such as pulsars and supernova remnants.
Equations (3.230), (3.232), and the relation c = ω/k, imply that
B
0
=
E
0
c
. (3.241)
Thus, the magnetic ﬁeld associated with an electromagnetic wave is smaller in
magnitude than the electric ﬁeld by a factor c. Consider a free charge interacting
with an electromagnetic wave. The force exerted on the charge is given by the
Lorentz formula
f = q (E +v ∧ B). (3.242)
121
The ratio of the electric and magnetic forces is
f
magnetic
f
electric
∼
v B
0
E
0
∼
v
c
. (3.243)
So, unless the charge is relativistic the electric force greatly exceeds the magnetic
force. Clearly, in most terrestrial situations electromagnetic waves are an essen
tially electric phenomenon (as far as their interaction with matter goes). For
this reason, electromagnetic waves are usually characterized by their wavevector
(which speciﬁes the direction of propagation and the wavelength) and the plane
of polarization (i.e., the plane of oscillation) of the associated electric ﬁeld. For a
given wavevector k, the electric ﬁeld can have any direction in the plane normal
to k. However, there are only two independent directions in a plane (i.e., we
can only deﬁne two linearly independent vectors in a plane). This implies that
there are only two independent polarizations of an electromagnetic wave, once its
direction of propagation is speciﬁed.
Let us now derive the velocity of light from Maxwell’s equation the hard way.
Suppose that we take the curl of the fourth Maxwell equation, Eq. (3.220d). We
obtain
∇∧ ∇∧ B = ∇(∇ B) −∇
2
B = −∇
2
B =
0
µ
0
∂ ∇∧ E
∂t
. (3.244)
Here, we have used the fact that ∇ B = 0. The third Maxwell equation,
Eq. (3.220c), yields
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
B = 0, (3.245)
where use has been made of Eq. (3.238). A similar equation can obtained for the
electric ﬁeld by taking the curl of Eq. (3.220c):
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
E = 0, (3.246)
We have found that electric and magnetic ﬁelds both satisfy equations of the
form
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
A = 0 (3.247)
122
in free space. As is easily veriﬁed, the most general solution to this equation
(with a positive frequency) is
A
x
= F
x
(k r −kc t),
A
y
= F
y
(k r −kc t),
A
z
= F
z
(k r −kc t), (3.248)
where F
x
(φ), F
y
(φ), and F
z
(φ) are onedimensional scalar functions. Looking
along the direction of the wavevector, so that r = (k/k) r, we ﬁnd that
A
x
= F
x
( k (r −ct) ),
A
y
= F
y
( k (r −ct) ),
A
z
= F
z
( k (r −ct) ). (3.249)
The xcomponent of this solution is shown schematically below; it clearly prop
agates in r with velocity c. If we look along a direction which is perpendicular
to k then k r = 0 and there is no propagation. Thus, the components of A
are arbitrarily shaped pulses which propagate, without changing shape, along
the direction of k with velocity c. These pulses can be related to the sinusoidal
ct
F (r, t) F (r, t=0)
r >
x x
plane wave solutions which we found earlier by Fourier transformation. Thus, any
arbitrary shaped pulse propagating in the direction of k with velocity c can be
123
broken down into lots of sinusoidal oscillations propagating in the same direction
with the same velocity.
The operator
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
(3.250)
is called the d’Alembertian. It is the four dimensional equivalent of the Lapla
cian. Recall that the Laplacian is invariant under rotational transformation. The
d’Alembertian goes one better than this because it is both rotationally invariant
and Lorentz invariant. The d’Alembertian is conventionally denoted 2
2
. Thus,
electromagnetic waves in free space satisfy the wave equations
2
2
E = 0,
2
2
B = 0. (3.251)
When written in terms of the vector and scalar potentials, Maxwell’s equations
reduce to
2
2
φ = −
ρ
0
,
2
2
A = −µ
0
j. (3.252)
These are clearly driven wave equations. Our next task is to ﬁnd the solutions to
these equations.
3.20 Green’s functions
Earlier on in this lecture course we had to solve Poisson’s equation
∇
2
u = v, (3.253)
where v(r) is denoted the source function. The potential u(r) satisﬁes the bound
ary condition
u(r) →0 as [r[ →∞, (3.254)
provided that the source function is reasonably localized. The solutions to Pois
son’s equation are superposable (because the equation is linear). This property
124
is exploited in the Green’s function method of solving this equation. The Green’s
function G(r, r
) is the potential, which satisﬁes the appropriate boundary con
ditions, generated by a unit amplitude point source located at r
. Thus,
∇
2
G(r, r
) = δ(r −r
). (3.255)
Any source function v(r) can be represented as a weighted sum of point sources
v(r) =
_
δ(r −r
) v(r
) d
3
r
. (3.256)
It follows from superposability that the potential generated by the source v(r)
can be written as the weighted sum of point source driven potentials (i.e., Green’s
functions)
u(r) =
_
G(r, r
) v(r
) d
3
r
. (3.257)
We found earlier that the Green’s function for Poisson’s equation is
G(r, r
) = −
1
4π
1
[r −r
[
. (3.258)
It follows that the general solution to Eq. (3.253) is written
u(r) = −
1
4π
_
v(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.259)
Note that the point source driven potential (3.258) is perfectly sensible. It is
spherically symmetric about the source, and falls oﬀ smoothly with increasing
distance from the source.
We now need to solve the wave equation
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
u = v, (3.260)
where v(r, t) is a time varying source function. The potential u(r, t) satisﬁes the
boundary conditions
u(r) →0 as [r[ →∞ and [t[ →∞. (3.261)
125
The solutions to Eq. (3.260) are superposable (since the equation is linear), so a
Green’s function method of solution is again appropriate. The Green’s function
G(r, r
; t, t
) is the potential generated by a point impulse located at position r
and applied at time t
. Thus,
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G(r, r
; t, t
) = δ(r −r
)δ(t −t
). (3.262)
Of course, the Green’s function must satisfy the correct boundary conditions. A
general source v(r, t) can be built up from a weighted sum of point impulses
v(r, t) =
_ _
δ(r −r
)δ(t −t
) v(r
, t
) d
3
r
dt
. (3.263)
It follows that the potential generated by v(r, t) can be written as the weighted
sum of point impulse driven potentials
u(r, t) =
_ _
G(r, r
; t, t
) v(r
, t
) d
3
r
dt
. (3.264)
So, how do we ﬁnd the Green’s function?
Consider
G(r, r
; t, t
) =
F(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
, (3.265)
where F(φ) is a general scalar function. Let us try to prove the following theorem:
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G = −4π F(t −t
) δ(r −r
). (3.266)
At a general point, r ,= r
, the above expression reduces to
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G = 0. (3.267)
So, we basically have to show that G is a valid solution of the free space wave
equation. We can easily show that
∂[r −r
[
∂x
=
x −x
[r −r
[
. (3.268)
126
It follows by simple diﬀerentiation that
∂
2
G
∂x
2
=
_
3(x −x
)
2
−[r −r
[
2
[r −r
[
5
_
F
+
_
3(x −x
)
2
−[r −r
[
2
[r −r
[
4
_
F
c
+
(x −x
)
2
[r −r
[
3
F
c
2
, (3.269)
where F
(φ) = dF(φ)/dφ. We can derive analogous equations for ∂
2
G/∂y
2
and
∂
2
G/∂z
2
. Thus,
∇
2
G =
∂
2
G
∂x
2
+
∂
2
G
∂y
2
+
∂
2
G
∂z
2
=
F
[r −r
[ c
2
=
1
c
2
∂
2
G
∂t
2
, (3.270)
giving
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G = 0, (3.271)
which is the desired result. Consider, now, the region around r = r
. It is clear
from Eq. (3.269) that the dominant term on the lefthand side as [r − r
[ → 0
is the ﬁrst one, which is essentially F ∂
2
([r − r
[
−1
)/∂x
2
. It is also clear that
(1/c
2
)(∂
2
G/∂t
2
) is negligible compared to this term. Thus, as [r − r
[ → 0 we
ﬁnd that
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G →F(t −t
) ∇
2
_
1
[r −r
[
_
. (3.272)
However, according to Eqs. (3.255) and (3.258)
∇
2
_
1
[r −r
[
_
= −4π δ(r −r
). (3.273)
We conclude that
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G = −4π F(t −t
) δ(r −r
), (3.274)
which is the desired result.
Let us now make the special choice
F(φ) = −
δ(φ)
4π
. (3.275)
127
It follows from Eq. (3.274) that
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
G = δ(r −r
)δ(t −t
). (3.276)
Thus,
G(r, r
; t, t
) = −
1
4π
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
(3.277)
is the Green’s function for the driven wave equation (3.260).
The time dependent Green’s function (3.277) is the same as the steady state
Green’s function (3.258), apart from the delta function appearing in the former.
What does this delta function do? Well, consider an observer at point r. Because
of the delta function our observer only measures a nonzero potential at one
particular time
t = t
+
[r −r
[
c
. (3.278)
It is clear that this is the time the impulse was applied at position r
(i.e., t
)
plus the time taken for a light signal to travel between points r
and r. At time
t > t
the locus of all points at which the potential is nonzero is
[r −r
[ = c (t −t
). (3.279)
In other words, it is a sphere centred on r
whose radius is the distance traveled by
light in the time interval since the impulse was applied at position r
. Thus, the
Green’s function (3.277) describes a spherical wave which emanates from position
r
at time t
and propagates at the speed of light. The amplitude of the wave is
inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
3.21 Retarded potentials
We are now in a position to solve Maxwell’s equations. Recall that in steady
state Maxwell’s equations reduce to
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
,
∇
2
A = −µ
0
j. (3.280)
128
The solutions to these equations are easily found using the Green’s function for
Poisson’s equation (3.258):
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
A(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.281)
The time dependent Maxwell equations reduce to
2
2
φ = −
ρ
0
,
2
2
A = −µ
0
j. (3.282)
We can solve these equations using the time dependent Green’s function (3.277).
From Eq. (3.264) we ﬁnd that
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_ _
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c) ρ(r
, t
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
dt
, (3.283)
with a similar equation for A. Using the well known property of delta functions,
these equations reduce to
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
, t −[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
A(r, t) =
µ
0
4π
_
j(r
, t −[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.284)
These are the general solutions to Maxwell’s equations! Note that the time de
pendent solutions (3.284) are the same as the steady state solutions (3.281),
apart from the weird way in which time appears in the former. According to
Eqs. (3.284), if we want to work out the potentials at position r and time t we
have to perform integrals of the charge density and current density over all space
(just like in the steady state situation). However, when we calculate the contri
bution of charges and currents at position r
to these integrals we do not use the
values at time t, instead we use the values at some earlier time t−[r−r
[/c. What
is this earlier time? It is simply the latest time at which a light signal emitted
129
from position r
would be received at position r before time t. This is called the
retarded time. Likewise, the potentials (3.284) are called retarded potentials. It
is often useful to adopt the following notation
A(r
, t −[r −r
[/c) ≡ [A(r
, t)] . (3.285)
The square brackets denote retardation (i.e., using the retarded time instead of
the real time). Using this notation Eqs. (3.284) become
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
[ρ(r
)]
[r −r
[
d
3
r
,
A(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
[j(r
)]
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (3.286)
The time dependence in the above equations is taken as read.
We are now in a position to understand electromagnetism at its most funda
mental level. A charge distribution ρ(r, t) can thought of as built up out of a
collection or series of charges which instantaneously come into existence, at some
point r
and some time t
, and then disappear again. Mathematically, this is
written
ρ(r, t) =
_ _
δ(r −r
)δ(t −t
) ρ(r
, t
) d
3
r
dt
. (3.287)
Likewise, we can think of a current distribution j(r, t) as built up out of a col
lection or series of currents which instantaneously appear and then disappear:
j(r, t) =
_ _
δ(r −r
)δ(t −t
) j(r
, t
) d
3
r
dt
. (3.288)
Each of these ephemeral charges and currents excites a spherical wave in the
appropriate potential. Thus, the charge density at r
and t
sends out a wave in
the scalar potential:
φ(r, t) =
ρ(r
, t
)
4π
0
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
. (3.289)
Likewise, the current density at r
and t
sends out a wave in the vector potential:
A(r, t) =
µ
0
j(r
, t
)
4π
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
. (3.290)
130
These waves can be thought of as little messengers which inform other charges
and currents about the charges and currents present at position r
and time t
.
However, the messengers travel at a ﬁnite speed; i.e., the speed of light. So, by
the time they reach other charges and currents their message is a little out of date.
Every charge and every current in the universe emits these spherical waves. The
resultant scalar and vector potential ﬁelds are given by Eqs. (3.286). Of course,
we can turn these ﬁelds into electric and magnetic ﬁelds using Eqs. (3.187). We
can then evaluate the force exerted on charges using the Lorentz formula. We can
see that we have now escaped from the apparent action at a distance nature of
Coulomb’s law and the BiotSavart law. Electromagnetic information is carried
by spherical waves in the vector and scalar potentials and, therefore, travels at the
velocity of light. Thus, if we change the position of a charge then a distant charge
can only respond after a time delay suﬃcient for a spherical wave to propagate
from the former to the latter charge.
Let us compare the steadystate law
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
(3.291)
with the corresponding time dependent law
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
[ρ(r
)]
[r −r
[
d
3
r
(3.292)
These two formulae look very similar indeed, but there is an important diﬀerence.
We can imagine (rather pictorially) that every charge in the universe is continu
ously performing the integral (3.291), and is also performing a similar integral to
ﬁnd the vector potential. After evaluating both potentials, the charge can calcu
late the ﬁelds and using the Lorentz force law it can then work out its equation of
motion. The problem is that the information the charge receives from the rest of
the universe is carried by our spherical waves, and is always slightly out of date
(because the waves travel at a ﬁnite speed). As the charge considers more and
more distant charges or currents its information gets more and more out of date.
(Similarly, when astronomers look out to more and more distant galaxies in the
universe they are also looking backwards in time. In fact, the light we receive
from the most distant observable galaxies was emitted when the universe was
131
only about a third of its present age.) So, what does our electron do? It simply
uses the most up to date information about distant charges and currents which
it possesses. So, instead of incorporating the charge density ρ(r, t) in its integral
the electron uses the retarded charge density [ρ(r, t)] (i.e., the density evaluated
at the retarded time). This is eﬀectively what Eq. (3.292) says.
t > t t < t < t t < t
1
2 2 1
Consider a thought experiment in which a charge q appears at position r
0
at
time t
1
, persists for a while, and then disappears at time t
2
. What is the electric
ﬁeld generated by such a charge? Using Eq. (3.292), we ﬁnd that
φ(r) =
q
4π
0
1
[r −r
0
[
for t
1
≤ t −[r −r
0
[/c ≤ t
2
= 0 otherwise. (3.293)
Now, E = −∇φ (since there are no currents, and therefore no vector potential is
generated), so
E(r) =
q
4π
0
r −r
0
[r −r
0
[
3
for t
1
≤ t −[r −r
0
[/c ≤ t
2
= 0 otherwise. (3.294)
This solution is shown pictorially above. We can see that the charge eﬀectively
emits a Coulomb electric ﬁeld which propagates radially away from the charge
at the speed of light. Likewise, it is easy to show that a current carrying wire
eﬀectively emits an Amp`erian magnetic ﬁeld at the speed of light.
132
We can now appreciate the essential diﬀerence between time dependent elec
tromagnetism and the action at a distance laws of Coulomb and Biot & Savart.
In the latter theories, the ﬁeld lines act rather like rigid wires attached to charges
(or circulating around currents). If the charges (or currents) move then so do the
ﬁeld lines, leading inevitably to unphysical action at a distance type behaviour.
In the time dependent theory charges act rather like water sprinklers; i.e., they
spray out the Coulomb ﬁeld in all directions at the speed of light. Similarly,
current carrying wires throw out magnetic ﬁeld loops at the speed of light. If we
move a charge (or current) then ﬁeld lines emitted beforehand are not aﬀected, so
the ﬁeld at a distant charge (or current) only responds to the change in position
after a time delay suﬃcient for the ﬁeld to propagate between the two charges (or
currents) at the speed of light. In Coulomb’s law and the BiotSavart law it is not
obvious that the electric and magnetic ﬁelds have any real existence. The only
measurable quantities are the forces acting between charges and currents. We can
describe the force acting on a given charge or current, due to the other charges
and currents in the universe, in terms of the local electric and magnetic ﬁelds,
but we have no way of knowing whether these ﬁelds persist when the charge or
current is not present (i.e., we could argue that electric and magnetic ﬁelds are
just a convenient way of calculating forces but, in reality, the forces are trans
mitted directly between charges and currents by some form of magic). However,
it is patently obvious that electric and magnetic ﬁelds have a real existence in
the time dependent theory. Consider the following thought experiment. Suppose
that a charge q
1
comes into existence for a period of time, emits a Coulomb ﬁeld,
133
and then disappears. Suppose that a distant charge q
2
interacts with this ﬁeld,
but is suﬃciently far from the ﬁrst charge that by the time the ﬁeld arrives the
ﬁrst charge has already disappeared. The force exerted on the second charge
is only ascribable to the electric ﬁeld; it cannot be ascribed to the ﬁrst charge
because this charge no longer exists by the time the force is exerted. The electric
ﬁeld clearly transmits energy and momentum between the two charges. Anything
which possesses energy and momentum is “real” in a physical sense. Later on in
this course we shall demonstrate that electric and magnetic ﬁelds conserve energy
and momentum.
Let us now consider a moving charge. Such a charge is continually emitting
spherical waves in the scalar potential, and the resulting wave front pattern is
sketched below. Clearly, the wavefronts are more closely spaced in front of the
charge than they are behind it, suggesting that the electric ﬁeld in front is larger
than the ﬁeld behind. In a medium, such as water or air, where waves travel
at a ﬁnite speed c (say) it is possible to get a very interesting eﬀect if the wave
source travels at some velocity v which exceeds the wave speed. This is illus
trated below. The locus of the outermost wave front is now a cone instead of a
sphere. The wave intensity on the cone is extremely large: this is a shock wave!
The half angle θ of the shock wave cone is simply cos
−1
(c/v). In water, shock
waves are produced by fast moving boats. We call these “bow waves.” In air,
shock waves are produced by speeding bullets and supersonic jets. In the latter
case we call these “sonic booms.” Is there any such thing as an electromagnetic
134
v t
θ
c t
shock wave? At ﬁrst sight, the answer to this question would appear to be, no.
After all, electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light and no wave source
(i.e., an electrically charged particle) can travel faster than this velocity. This
is a rather disappointing conclusion. However, when an electromagnetic wave
travels through matter a remarkable thing happens. The oscillating electric ﬁeld
of the wave induces a slight separation of the positive and negative charges in
the atoms which make up the material. We call separated positive and negative
charges an electric dipole. Of course, the atomic dipoles oscillate in sympathy
with the ﬁeld which induces them. However, an oscillating electric dipole radiates
electromagnetic waves. Amazingly, when we add the original wave to these in
duced waves it is exactly as if the original wave propagates through the material
in question at a velocity which is slower than the velocity of light in vacuum.
Suppose, now, that we shoot a charged particle through the material faster than
the slowed down velocity of electromagnetic waves. This is possible since the
waves are traveling slower than the velocity of light in vacuum. In practice, the
particle has to be traveling pretty close to the velocity of light in vacuum (i.e., it
has to be relativistic), but modern particle accelerators produce copious amount
of such particles. Now, we can get an electromagnetic shock wave. We expect an
intense cone of emission, just like the bow wave produced by a fast ship. In fact,
this type of radiation has been observed. It is called Cherenkov radiation, and it
is very useful in high energy physics. Cherenkov radiation is typically produced
by surrounding a particle accelerator with perspex blocks. Relativistic charged
particles emanating from the accelerator pass through the perspex traveling faster
135
than the local velocity of light and therefore emit Cherenkov radiation. We know
the velocity of light (c
∗
, say) in perspex (this can be worked out from the refrac
tive index), so if we can measure the half angle θ of the radiation cone emitted by
each particle then we can evaluate the speed of the particle v via the geometric
relation cos θ = c
∗
/v.
3.22 Advanced potentials?
We have deﬁned the retarded time
t
r
= t −[r −r
[/c (3.295)
as the latest time at which a light signal emitted from position r
would reach po
sition r before time t. We have also shown that a solution to Maxwell’s equations
can be written in terms of retarded potentials:
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
, t
r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.296)
etc. But, is this the most general solution? Suppose that we deﬁne the advanced
time.
t
a
= t +[r −r
[/c. (3.297)
This is the time a light signal emitted at time t from position r would reach
position r
. It turns out that we can also write a solution to Maxwell’s equations
in terms of advanced potentials:
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
, t
a
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (3.298)
etc. In fact, this is just as good a solution to Maxwell’s equation as the one
involving retarded potentials. To get some idea what is going on let us examine
the Green’s function corresponding to our retarded potential solution:
φ(r, t) =
ρ(r
, t
)
4π
0
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
, (3.299)
136
with a similar equation for the vector potential. This says that the charge density
present at position r
and time t
emits a spherical wave in the scalar potential
which propagates forwards in time. The Green’s function corresponding to our
advanced potential solution is
φ(r, t) =
ρ(r
, t
)
4π
0
δ(t −t
+[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
. (3.300)
This says that the charge density present at position r
and time t
emits a
spherical wave in the scalar potential which propagates backwards in time. “But,
hang on a minute,” you might say, “ everybody knows that electromagnetic waves
can’t travel backwards in time. If they did then causality would be violated.”
Well, you know that electromagnetic waves do not propagate backwards in time,
I know that electromagnetic waves do not propagate backwards in time, but the
question is do Maxwell’s equations know this? Consider the wave equation for
the scalar potential:
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
φ = −
ρ
0
. (3.301)
This equation is manifestly symmetric in time (i.e., it is invariant under the trans
formation t →−t). Thus, backward traveling waves are just as good a solution to
this equation as forward traveling waves. The equation is also symmetric in space
(i.e., it is invariant under the transformation x →−x). So, why do we adopt the
Green’s function (3.299) which is symmetric in space (i.e., it is invariant under
x →−x) but asymmetric in time (i.e., it is not invariant under t →−t)? Would
it not be better to use the completely symmetric Green’s function
φ(r, t) =
ρ(r
, t
)
4π
0
1
2
_
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
+
δ(t −t
+[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
_
? (3.302)
In other words, a charge emits half of its waves running forwards in time (i.e.,
retarded waves) and the other half running backwards in time (i.e., advanced
waves). This sounds completely crazy! However, in the 1940’s Richard P. Feyn
man and John A. Wheeler pointed out that under certain circumstances this
prescription gives the right answer. Consider a charge interacting with “the rest
of the universe,” where the “rest of the universe” denotes all of the distant charges
in the universe and is, by implication, an awful long way away from our original
137
charge. Suppose that the “rest of the universe” is a perfect reﬂector of advanced
waves and a perfect absorbed of retarded waves. The waves emitted by the charge
can be written schematically as
F =
1
2
(retarded) +
1
2
(advanced). (3.303)
The response of the rest of the universe is written
R =
1
2
(retarded) −
1
2
(advanced). (3.304)
This is illustrated in the spacetime diagram below. Here, A and R denote the
time
space
charge
rest of universe
a
R
A
aa
advanced and retarded waves emitted by the charge, respectively. The advanced
wave travels to “the rest of the universe” and is reﬂected; i.e., the distant charges
oscillate in response to the advanced wave and emit a retarded wave a, as shown.
The retarded wave a is spherical wave which converges on the original charge,
passes through the charge, and then diverges again. The divergent wave is de
noted aa. Note that a looks like a negative advanced wave emitted by the charge,
whereas aa looks like a positive retarded wave emitted by the charge. This is
138
essentially what Eq. (3.304) says. The retarded waves R and aa are absorbed by
“the rest of the universe.”
If we add the waves emitted by the charge to the response of “the rest of the
universe” we obtain
F
= F +R = (retarded). (3.305)
Thus, charges appear to emit only retarded waves, which agrees with our everyday
experience. Clearly, in this model we have sidestepped the problem of a time
asymmetric Green’s function by adopting time asymmetric boundary conditions
to the universe; i.e., the distant charges in the universe absorb retarded waves
and reﬂect advanced waves. This is possible because the absorption takes place
at the end of the universe (i.e., at the “big crunch,” or whatever) and the re
ﬂection takes place at the beginning of the universe (i.e., at the “big bang”). It
is quite plausible that the state of the universe (and, hence, its interaction with
electromagnetic waves) is completely diﬀerent at these two times. It should be
pointed out that the FeynmanWheeler model runs into trouble when one tries to
combine electromagnetism with quantum mechanics. These diﬃculties have yet
to be resolved, so at present the status of this model is that it is “an interesting
idea” but it is still not fully accepted into the canon of physics.
3.23 Retarded ﬁelds
We know the solution to Maxwell’s equations in terms of retarded potentials. Let
us now construct the associated electric and magnetic ﬁelds using
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
,
B = ∇∧ A. (3.306)
It is helpful to write
R = r −r
, (3.307)
where R = [r − r
[. The retarded time becomes t
r
= t − R/c, and a general
retarded quantity is written [F(r, t)] ≡ F(r, t
r
). Thus, we can write the retarded
139
potential solutions of Maxwell’s equations in the especially compact form:
φ =
1
4π
0
_
[ρ]
R
dV
,
A =
µ
0
4π
_
[j]
R
dV
, (3.308)
where dV
≡ d
3
r
.
It is easily seen that
∇φ =
1
4π
0
_ _
[ρ]∇(R
−1
) +
[∂ρ/∂t]
R
∇t
r
_
dV
= −
1
4π
0
_ _
[ρ]
R
3
R−
[∂ρ/∂t]
cR
2
R
_
dV
, (3.309)
where use has been made of
∇R =
R
R
, ∇(R
−1
) = −
R
R
3
, ∇t
r
= −
R
cR
. (3.310)
Likewise,
∇∧ A =
µ
0
4π
_ _
∇(R
−1
) ∧ [j] +
∇t
r
∧ [∂j/∂t]
R
_
dV
= −
µ
0
4π
_ _
R∧ [j]
R
3
+
R∧ [∂j/∂t]
cR
2
_
dV
. (3.311)
Equations (3.306), (3.309), and (3.311) can be combined to give
E =
1
4π
0
_ _
[ρ]
R
R
3
+
_
∂ρ
∂t
_
R
cR
2
−
[∂j/∂t]
c
2
R
_
dV
, (3.312)
which is the time dependent generalization of Coulomb’s law, and
B =
µ
0
4π
_ _
[j] ∧ R
R
3
+
[∂j/∂t] ∧ R
cR
2
_
dV
, (3.313)
140
which is the time dependent generalization of the BiotSavart law.
Suppose that the typical variation timescale of our charges and currents is
t
0
. Let us deﬁne R
0
= c t
0
which is the distance a light ray travels in time t
0
. We
can evaluate Eqs. (3.312) and (3.313) in two asymptotic limits: the “near ﬁeld”
region R ¸R
0
, and the “far ﬁeld” region R ¸R
0
. In the near ﬁeld region
[t −t
r
[
t
0
=
R
R
0
¸1, (3.314)
so the diﬀerence between retarded time and standard time is relatively small.
This allows us to expand retarded quantities in a Taylor series. Thus,
[ρ] · ρ +
∂ρ
∂t
(t
r
−t) +
1
2
∂
2
ρ
∂t
2
(t
r
−t) + , (3.315)
giving
[ρ] · ρ −
∂ρ
∂t
R
c
+
1
2
∂
2
ρ
∂t
2
R
2
c
2
+ . (3.316)
Expansion of the retarded quantities in the near ﬁeld region yields
E ·
1
4π
0
_ _
ρ R
R
3
−
1
2
∂
2
ρ
∂t
2
R
c
2
R
−
∂j/∂t
c
2
R
+
_
dV
, (3.317a)
B ·
µ
0
4π
_ _
j ∧ R
R
3
−
1
2
(∂
2
j/∂t
2
) ∧ R
c
2
R
+
_
dV
. (3.317b)
In Eq. (3.317a) the ﬁrst term on the righthand side corresponds to Coulomb’s
law, the second term is the correction due to retardation eﬀects, and the third
term corresponds to Faraday induction. In Eq. (3.317b) the ﬁrst term on the
righthand side is the BiotSavart law and the second term is the correction due
to retardation eﬀects. Note that the retardation corrections are only of order
(R/R
0
)
2
. We might suppose, from looking at Eqs. (3.312) and (3.313), that
the corrections should be of order R/R
0
, however all of the order R/R
0
terms
canceled out in the previous expansion. Suppose, then, that we have a d.c.
circuit sitting on a laboratory benchtop. Let the currents in the circuit change on
a typical timescale of one tenth of a second. In this time light can travel about
310
7
meters, so R
0
∼ 30, 000 kilometers. The lengthscale of the experiment is
141
about one meter, so R = 1 meter. Thus, the retardation corrections are of order
(3 10
7
)
−2
∼ 10
−15
. It is clear that we are fairly safe just using Coulomb’s law,
Faraday’s law, and the BiotSavart law to analyze the ﬁelds generated by this
type of circuit.
In the far ﬁeld region, R ¸ R
0
, Eqs. (3.312) and (3.313) are dominated by
the terms which vary like R
−1
, so
E · −
1
4π
0
_
[∂j
⊥
/∂t]
c
2
R
dV
, (3.318a)
B ·
µ
0
4π
_
[∂j
⊥
/∂t] ∧ R
cR
2
dV
, (3.318b)
where
j
⊥
= j −
(j R)
R
2
R. (3.318c)
Here, use has been made of [∂ρ/∂t] = −[∇ j] and [∇ j] = −[∂j/∂t] R/cR +
O(1/R
2
). Suppose that our charges and currents are localized to some region in
the vicinity of r
= r
∗
. Let R
∗
= r − r
∗
, with R
∗
= [r − r
∗
[. Suppose that
the extent of the current and charge containing region is much less than R
∗
. It
follows that retarded quantities can be written
[ρ(r, t)] · ρ(r, t −R
∗
/c), (3.319)
etc. Thus, the electric ﬁeld reduces to
E · −
1
4π
0
__
∂j
⊥
/∂t dV
¸
c
2
R
∗
, (3.320)
whereas the magnetic ﬁeld is given by
B ·
1
4π
0
__
∂j
⊥
/∂t dV
¸
∧ R
∗
c
3
R
2
∗
. (3.321)
Note that
E
B
= c, (3.322)
142
and
E B = 0. (3.323)
This conﬁguration of electric and magnetic ﬁelds is characteristic of an elec
tromagnetic wave (see Section 3.19). Thus, Eqs. (3.322) and (3.323) describe
an electromagnetic wave propagating radially away from the charge and current
containing region. Note that the wave is driven by time varying electric currents.
Now, charges moving with a constant velocity constitute a steady current, so a
nonsteady current is associated with accelerating charges. We conclude that ac
celerating electric charges emit electromagnetic waves. The wave ﬁelds, (3.320)
and (3.321), fall oﬀ like the inverse of the distance from the wave source. This
behaviour should be contrasted with that of Coulomb or BiotSavart ﬁelds which
fall oﬀ like the inverse square of the distance from the source. The fact that wave
ﬁelds attenuate fairly gently with increasing distance from the source is what
makes astronomy possible. If wave ﬁelds obeyed an inverse square law then no
appreciable radiation would reach us from the rest of the universe.
In conclusion, electric and magnetic ﬁelds look simple in the near ﬁeld region
(they are just Coulomb ﬁelds, etc.) and also in the far ﬁeld region (they are just
electromagnetic waves). Only in the intermediate region, R ∼ R
0
, do things start
getting really complicated (so we do not look in this region!).
3.24 Summary
This marks the end of our theoretical investigation of Maxwell’s equations. Let
us now summarize what we have learned so far. The ﬁeld equations which govern
electric and magnetic ﬁelds are written:
∇ E =
ρ
0
, (3.324a)
∇ B = 0, (3.324b)
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
, (3.324c)
∇∧ B = µ
0
j +
1
c
2
∂E
∂t
. (3.324d)
143
These equations can be integrated to give
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ dV, (3.325a)
_
S
B dS = 0, (3.325b)
_
C
E dl = −
∂
∂t
_
S
B dS, (3.325c)
_
C
B dl = µ
0
_
S
j dS +
1
c
2
∂
∂t
_
S
E dS. (3.325d)
Equations (3.324b) and (3.324c) are automatically satisﬁed by writing
E = −∇φ −
∂A
∂t
, (3.326a)
B = ∇∧ A. (3.326b)
This prescription is not unique (there are many choices of φ and A which gen
erate the same ﬁelds) but we can make it unique by adopting the following con
ventions:
φ(r) →0 as [r[ →∞, (3.327)
and
1
c
2
∂φ
∂t
+∇ A = 0. (3.328)
Equations (3.324a) and (3.324d) reduce to
2
2
φ = −
ρ
0
, (3.329a)
2
2
A = −µ
0
j (3.329b)
These are driven wave equations of the general form
2
2
u ≡
_
∇
2
−
1
c
2
∂
2
∂t
2
_
u = v. (3.330)
144
The Green’s function for this equation which satisﬁes the boundary conditions
and is consistent with causality is
G(r, r
; t, t
) = −
1
4π
δ(t −t
−[r −r
[/c)
[r −r
[
. (3.331)
Thus, the solutions to Eqs. (3.329) are
φ(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_
[ρ]
R
dV
, (3.332a)
A(r, t) =
µ
0
4π
_
[j]
R
dV
, (3.332b)
where R = [r − r
[, and dV
= d
3
r
, with [A] ≡ A(r
, t − R/c). These solutions
can be combined with Eqs. (3.326) to give
E(r, t) =
1
4π
0
_ _
[ρ]
R
R
3
+
_
∂ρ
∂t
_
R
cR
2
−
[∂j/∂t]
c
2
R
_
dV
, (3.333a)
B(r, t) =
µ
0
4π
_ _
[j] ∧ R
R
3
+
[∂j/∂t] ∧ R
cR
2
_
dV
. (3.333b)
Equations (3.324)–(3.333) constitute the complete theory of classical electro
magnetism. We can express the same information in terms of ﬁeld equations
[Eqs. (3.324) ], integrated ﬁeld equations [Eqs. (3.325) ], retarded electromagnetic
potentials [Eqs. (3.332) ], and retarded electromagnetic ﬁelds [Eqs. (3.333) ]. Let
us now consider the applications of this theory.
145
4 Applications of Maxwell’s equations
4.1 Electrostatic energy
Consider a collection of N static point charges q
i
located at position vectors r
i
(where i runs from 1 to N). What is the electrostatic energy stored in such a
collection? Another way of asking this is, how much work would we have to do
in order to assemble the charges, starting from an initial state in which they are
all at rest and also very widely separated?
We know that a static electric ﬁeld is conservative and can consequently be
written in terms of a scalar potential:
E = −∇φ. (4.1)
We also know that the electric force on a charge q is written
f = q E. (4.2)
The work we would have to do against electrical forces in order to move the charge
from point P to point Q is simply
W = −
_
Q
P
f dl = −q
_
Q
P
E dl = q
_
Q
P
∇φ dl = q [φ(Q) −φ(P)] . (4.3)
The negative sign in the above expression comes about because we would have
to exert a force −f on the charge in order to counteract the force exerted by the
electric ﬁeld. Recall that the scalar potential generated by a point charge q
at
position r
is
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
q
[r −r
[
. (4.4)
Let us build up our collection of charges one by one. It takes no work to bring
the ﬁrst charge from inﬁnity, since there is no electric ﬁeld to ﬁght against. Let
us clamp this charge in position at r
1
. In order to bring the second charge into
146
position at r
2
we have to do work against the electric ﬁeld generated by the ﬁrst
charge. According to Eqs. (4.3) and Eqs. (4.4), this work is given by
W
2
=
1
4π
0
q
1
q
2
[r
1
−r
2
[
. (4.5)
Let us now bring the third charge into position. Since electric ﬁelds and scalar
potentials are superposable the work done whilst moving the third charge from in
ﬁnity to r
3
is simply the sum of the work done against the electric ﬁelds generated
by charges 1 and 2 taken in isolation:
W
3
=
1
4π
0
_
q
1
q
3
[r
1
−r
3
[
+
q
2
q
3
[r
2
−r
3
[
_
. (4.6)
Thus, the total work done in assembling the three charges is given by
W =
1
4π
0
_
q
1
q
2
[r
1
−r
2
[
+
q
1
q
3
[r
1
−r
3
[
+
q
2
q
3
[r
2
−r
3
[
_
. (4.7)
This result can easily be generalized to N charges:
W =
1
4π
0
N
i=1
N
j>i
q
i
q
j
[r
i
−r
j
[
. (4.8)
The restriction that j must be greater than i makes the above summation rather
messy. If we were to sum without restriction (other than j ,= i) then each pair
of charges would be counted twice. It is convenient to do just this and then to
divide the result by two. Thus,
W =
1
2
1
4π
0
N
i=1
N
j=1
j=i
q
i
q
j
[r
i
−r
j
[
. (4.9)
This is the potential energy (i.e., the diﬀerence between the total energy and the
kinetic energy) of a collection of charges. We can think of this as the work needed
to bring static charges from inﬁnity and assemble them in the required formation.
Alternatively, this is the kinetic energy which would be released if the collection
147
were dissolved and the charges returned to inﬁnity. But where is this potential
energy stored? Let us investigate further.
Equation (4.9) can be written
W =
1
2
N
i=1
q
i
φ
i
, (4.10)
where
φ
i
=
1
4π
0
N
j=1
j=i
q
j
[r
i
−r
j
[
(4.11)
is the scalar potential experienced by the i th charge due to the other charges in
the distribution.
Let us now consider the potential energy of a continuous charge distribution.
It is tempting to write
W =
1
2
_
ρ φd
3
r, (4.12)
by analogy with Eqs. (4.10) and (4.11), where
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
(4.13)
is the familiar scalar potential generated by a continuous charge distribution. Let
us try this out. We know from Poisson’s equation that
ρ =
0
∇E, (4.14)
so Eq. (4.12) can be written
W =
0
2
_
φ∇Ed
3
r. (4.15)
Vector ﬁeld theory yields the standard result
∇ (Eφ) = φ∇E +E∇φ. (4.16)
148
However, ∇φ = −E, so we obtain
W =
0
2
__
∇(Eφ) d
3
r +
_
E
2
d
3
r
_
(4.17)
Application of Gauss’ theorem gives
W =
0
2
__
S
φE dS +
_
V
E
2
dV
_
, (4.18)
where V is some volume which encloses all of the charges and S is its bounding
surface. Let us assume that V is a sphere, centred on the origin, and let us
take the limit in which radius r of this sphere goes to inﬁnity. We know that, in
general, the electric ﬁeld at large distances from a bounded charge distribution
looks like the ﬁeld of a point charge and, therefore, falls oﬀ like 1/r
2
. Likewise,
the potential falls oﬀ like 1/r. However, the surface area of the sphere increases
like r
2
. It is clear that in the limit as r → ∞ the surface integral in Eq. (4.18)
falls oﬀ like 1/r and is consequently zero. Thus, Eq. (4.18) reduces to
W =
0
2
_
E
2
d
3
r, (4.19)
where the integral is over all space. This is a very nice result! It tells us that
the potential energy of a continuous charge distribution is stored in the electric
ﬁeld. Of course, we now have to assume that an electric ﬁeld possesses an energy
density
U =
0
2
E
2
. (4.20)
We can easily check that Eq. (4.19) is correct. Suppose that we have a charge
Q which is uniformly distributed within a sphere of radius a. Let us imagine
building up this charge distribution from a succession of thin spherical layers of
inﬁnitesimal thickness. At each stage we gather a small amount of charge from
inﬁnity and spread it over the surface of the sphere in a thin layer from r to r+dr.
We continue this process until the ﬁnal radius of the sphere is a. If q(r) is the
charge in the sphere when it has attained radius r, the work done in bringing a
charge dq to it is
dW =
1
4π
0
q(r) dq
r
. (4.21)
149
This follows from Eq. (4.5) since the electric ﬁeld generated by a spherical charge
distribution (outside itself) is the same as that of a point charge q(r) located at
the origin (r = 0) (see later). If the constant charge density in the sphere is ρ
then
q(r) =
4
3
πr
3
ρ, (4.22)
and
dq = 4πr
2
ρ dr. (4.23)
Thus, Eq. (4.21) becomes
dW =
4π
3
0
ρ
2
r
4
dr. (4.24)
The total work needed to build up the sphere from nothing to radius a is plainly
W =
4π
3
0
ρ
2
_
a
0
r
4
dr =
4π
15
0
ρ
2
a
5
. (4.25)
This can also be written in terms of the total charge Q = (4/3)πa
3
ρ as
W =
3
5
Q
2
4π
0
a
. (4.26)
Now that we have evaluated the potential energy of a spherical charge distri
bution by the direct method, let us work it out using Eq. (4.19). We assume that
the electric ﬁeld is radial and spherically symmetric, so E = E
r
(r) ˆ r. Application
of Gauss’ law
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ dV, (4.27)
where V is a sphere of radius r, yields
E
r
(r) =
Q
4π
0
r
a
3
(4.28)
for r < a, and
E
r
(r) =
Q
4π
0
r
2
(4.29)
150
for r ≥ a. Note that the electric ﬁeld generated outside the charge distribution is
the same as that of a point charge Q located at the origin, r = 0. Equations (4.19),
(4.28), and (4.29) yield
W =
Q
2
8π
0
_
1
a
6
_
a
0
r
4
dr +
_
∞
a
dr
r
2
_
, (4.30)
which reduces to
W =
Q
2
8π
0
a
_
1
5
+ 1
_
=
3
5
Q
2
4π
0
a
. (4.31)
Thus, Eq. (4.19) gives the correct answer.
The reason we have checked Eq. (4.19) so carefully is that on close inspection
it is found to be inconsistent with Eq. (4.10), from which it was supposedly de
rived! For instance, the energy given by Eq. (4.19) is manifestly positive deﬁnite,
whereas the energy given by Eq. (4.10) can be negative (it is certainly negative for
a collection of two point charges of opposite sign). The inconsistency was intro
duced into our analysis when we replaced Eq. (4.11) by Eq. (4.13). In Eq. (4.11)
the selfinteraction of the i th charge with its own electric ﬁeld is excluded whereas
it is included in Eq. (4.13). Thus, the potential energies (4.10) and (4.19) are
diﬀerent because in the former we start from ready made point charges whereas
in the latter we build up the whole charge distribution from scratch. Thus, if
we were to work out the potential energy of a point charge distribution using
Eq. (4.19) we would obtain the energy (4.10) plus the energy required to assem
ble the point charges. What is the energy required to assemble a point charge?
In fact, it is inﬁnite! To see this let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that
our point charges are actually made of charge uniformly distributed over a small
sphere of radius a. According to Eq. (4.26) the energy required to assemble the
i th point charge is
W
i
=
3
5
q
2
i
4π
0
a
. (4.32)
We can think of this as the selfenergy of the i th charge. Thus, we can write
W =
0
2
_
E
2
d
3
r =
1
2
N
i=1
q
i
φ
i
+
N
i=1
W
i
(4.33)
151
which enables us to reconcile Eqs. (4.10) and (4.19). Unfortunately, if our point
charges really are point charges then a → 0 and the selfenergy of each charge
becomes inﬁnite. Thus, the potential energies predicted by Eqs. (4.10) and (4.19)
diﬀer by an inﬁnite amount. What does this all mean? We have to conclude
that the idea of locating electrostatic potential energy in the electric ﬁeld is
inconsistent with the assumption of the existence of point charges. One way out
of this diﬃculty would be to say that all elementary charges, such as electrons, are
not points but instead small distributions of charge. Alternatively, we could say
that our classical theory of electromagnetism breaks down on very small length
scales due to quantum eﬀects. Unfortunately, the quantum mechanical version
of electromagnetism (quantum electrodynamics or QED, for short) suﬀers from
the same inﬁnities in the selfenergies of particles as the classical version. There
is a prescription, called renormalization, for steering round these inﬁnities and
getting ﬁnite answers which agree with experiments to extraordinary accuracy.
However, nobody really understands why this prescription works. The problem
of the inﬁnite selfenergies of charged particles is still unresolved.
4.2 Ohm’s law
We all know the simplest version of Ohm’s law:
V = IR, (4.34)
where V is the voltage drop across a resistor of resistance R when a current I
ﬂows through it. Let us generalize this law so that it is expressed in terms of
E and j rather than V and I. Consider a length l of a conductor of uniform
crosssectional area A with a current I ﬂowing down it. In general, we expect
the electrical resistance of the conductor to be proportional to its length and
inversely proportional to its area (i.e., it is harder to push an electrical current
down a long rather than a short wire, and it is easier to push a current down a
wide rather than a narrow conducting channel.) Thus, we can write
R = η
l
A
. (4.35)
152
The constant η is called the resistivity and is measured in units of ohmmeters.
Ohm’s law becomes
V = η
l
A
I. (4.36)
However, I/A = j
z
(suppose that the conductor is aligned along the zaxis) and
V/l = E
z
, so the above equation reduces to
E
z
= ηj
z
. (4.37)
There is nothing special about the zaxis (in an isotropic conducting medium) so
the previous formula immediately generalizes to
E = η j. (4.38)
This is the vector form of Ohm’s law.
A charge q which moves through a voltage drop V acquires an energy qV
from the electric ﬁeld. In a resistor this energy is dissipated as heat. This type
of heating is called “ohmic heating.” Suppose that N charges per unit time pass
through a resistor. The current ﬂowing is obviously I = Nq. The total energy
gained by the charges, which appears as heat inside the resistor, is
P = N qV = IV (4.39)
per unit time. Thus, the heating power is
P = IV = I
2
R =
V
2
R
. (4.40)
Equations (4.39) and (4.40) generalize to
P = j E = η j
2
, (4.41)
where P is now the power dissipated per unit volume in a resistive medium.
4.3 Conductors
Most (but not all) electrical conductors obey Ohm’s law. Such conductors are
termed “ohmic.” Suppose that we apply an electric ﬁeld to an ohmic conduc
tor. What is going to happen? According to Eq. (4.38) the electric ﬁeld drives
153
currents. These redistribute the charge inside the conductor until the original
electric ﬁeld is canceled out. At this point, the currents stop ﬂowing. It might
be objected that the currents could keep ﬂowing in closed loops. According to
Ohm’s law, this would require a nonzero e.m.f.,
_
E dl, acting around each loop
(unless the conductor is a superconductor, with η = 0). However, we know that
in steadystate
_
C
E dl = 0 (4.42)
around any closed loop C. This proves that a steadystate e.m.f. acting around
a closed loop inside a conductor is impossible. The only other alternative is
j = E = 0 (4.43)
inside a conductor. It immediately follows from Gauss’ law, ∇ E = ρ/
0
, that
ρ = 0. (4.44)
So, there are no electric charges in the interior of a conductor. But, how can
a conductor cancel out an applied electric ﬁeld if it contains no charges? The
answer is that all of the charges reside on the surface of the conductor. In reality,
the charges lie within one or two atomic layers of the surface (see any textbook
on solidstate physics). The diﬀerence in scalar potential between two points P
and Q is simply
φ(Q) −φ(P) =
_
Q
P
∇φ dl = −
_
Q
P
E dl. (4.45)
However, if P and Q lie inside the same conductor then it is clear from Eq. (4.43)
that the potential diﬀerence between P and Q is zero. This is true no matter
where P and Q are situated inside the conductor, so we conclude that the scalar
potential must be uniform inside a conductor. A corollary of this is that the
surface of a conductor is an equipotential (i.e., φ = constant) surface.
Not only is the electric ﬁeld inside a conductor zero. It is also possible to
demonstrate that the ﬁeld within an empty cavity lying inside a conductor is also
zero, provided that there are no charges within the cavity. Let us, ﬁrst of all,
integrate Gauss’ law over a surface S which surrounds the cavity but lies wholly in
154
Conductor
Cavity
S

+
+
+
+





C +
+
+
the conducting material. Since the electric ﬁeld is zero in a conductor, it follows
that zero net charge is enclosed by S. This does not preclude the possibility that
there are equal amounts of positive and negative charges distributed on the inner
surface of the conductor. However, we can easily rule out this possibility using
the steadystate relation
_
C
E dl = 0, (4.46)
for any closed loop C. If there are any electric ﬁeld lines inside the cavity then
they must run from the positive to the negative surface charges. Consider a loop
C which straddles the cavity and the conductor, such as the one shown above. In
the presence of ﬁeld lines it is clear that the line integral of E along that portion
of the loop which lies inside the cavity is nonzero. However, the line integral of
E along that portion of the loop which runs through the conducting material is
obviously zero (since E = 0 inside a conductor). Thus, the line integral of the
ﬁeld around the closed loop C is nonzero. This, clearly contradicts Eq. (4.46).
In fact, this equation implies that the line integral of the electric ﬁeld along any
path which runs through the cavity, from one point on the interior surface of the
conductor to another, is zero. This can only be the case if the electric ﬁeld itself
is zero everywhere inside the cavity. There is one proviso to this argument. The
electric ﬁeld inside a cavity is only zero if the cavity contains no charges. If the
cavity contains charges then our argument fails because it is possible to envisage
155
that the line integral of the electric ﬁeld along many diﬀerent paths across the
cavity could be zero without the ﬁelds along these paths necessarily being zero
(this argument is somewhat inexact; we shall improve it later on).
We have shown that if a cavity is completely enclosed by a conductor then no
stationary distribution of charges outside can ever produce any ﬁelds inside. So,
we can shield a piece of electrical equipment from stray external electric ﬁelds by
placing it inside a metal can. Using similar arguments to those given above, we
can also show that no static distribution of charges inside a closed conductor can
ever produce a ﬁeld outside it. Clearly, shielding works both ways!
E
Conductor
Vacuum
A
Gaussian pillbox
Let us consider some small region on the surface of a conductor. Suppose that
the local surface charge density is σ, and that the electric ﬁeld just outside the
conductor is E. Note that this ﬁeld must be directed normal to the surface of
the conductor. Any parallel component would be shorted out by surface currents.
Another way of saying this is that the surface of a conductor is an equipotential.
We know that ∇φ is always perpendicular to equipotential surfaces, so E = −∇φ
must be locally perpendicular to a conducting surface. Let us use Gauss’ law,
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ dV, (4.47)
where V is a socalled “Gaussian pillbox.” This is a pillbox shaped volume
whose two ends are aligned normal to the surface of the conductor, with the
156
surface running between them, and whose sides are tangential to the surface
normal. It is clear that E is perpendicular to the sides of the box, so the sides
make no contribution to the surface integral. The end of the box which lies inside
the conductor also makes no contribution, since E = 0 inside a conductor. Thus,
the only nonzero contribution to the surface integral comes from the end lying
in free space. This contribution is simply E
⊥
A, where E
⊥
denotes an outward
pointing (from the conductor) normal electric ﬁeld, and A is the crosssectional
area of the box. The charge enclosed by the box is simply σ A, from the deﬁnition
σ
E
E
A
of a surface charge density. Thus, Gauss’ law yields
E
⊥
=
σ
0
(4.48)
as the relationship between the normal electric ﬁeld immediately outside a con
ductor and the surface charge density.
Let us look at the electric ﬁeld generated by a sheet charge distribution a
little more carefully. Suppose that the charge per unit area is σ. By symmetry,
we expect the ﬁeld generated below the sheet to be the mirror image of that
above the sheet (at least, locally). Thus, if we integrate Gauss’ law over a pill
box of cross sectional area A, as shown above, then the two ends both contribute
E
sheet
A to the surface integral, where E
sheet
is the normal electric ﬁeld generated
above and below the sheet. The charge enclosed by the pillbox is just σ A. Thus,
157
Gauss’ law yields a symmetric electric ﬁeld
E
sheet
= +
σ
2
0
above,
E
sheet
= −
σ
2
0
below. (4.49)
So, how do we get the asymmetric electric ﬁeld of a conducting surface, which
is zero immediately below the surface (i.e., inside the conductor) and nonzero
immediately above it? Clearly, we have to add in an external ﬁeld (i.e., a ﬁeld
which is not generated locally by the sheet charge). The requisite ﬁeld is
E
ext
=
σ
2
0
(4.50)
both above and below the charge sheet. The total ﬁeld is the sum of the ﬁeld
generated locally by the charge sheet and the external ﬁeld. Thus, we obtain
E
total
= +
σ
0
above,
E
total
= 0 below, (4.51)
which is in agreement with Eq. (4.48).
The external ﬁeld exerts a force on the charge sheet. The ﬁeld generated
locally by the sheet itself obviously cannot exert a force (the sheet cannot exert
a force on itself!). The force per unit area acting on the surface of the conductor
always acts outward and is given by
p = σE
ext
=
σ
2
2
0
. (4.52)
Thus, there is an electrostatic pressure acting on any charged conductor. This
eﬀect can be visualized by charging up soap bubbles; the additional electrostatic
pressure eventually causes them to burst. The electrostatic pressure can also be
written
p =
0
2
E
2
, (4.53)
where E is the ﬁeld strength immediately above the surface of the conductor. Note
that, according to the above formula, the electrostatic pressure is equivalent to
158
the energy density of the electric ﬁeld immediately outside the conductor. This is
not a coincidence. Suppose that the conductor expands by an average distance dx
due to the electrostatic pressure. The electric ﬁeld is excluded from the region into
which the conductor expands. The volume of this region dV = Adx, where A is
the surface area of the conductor. Thus, the energy of the electric ﬁeld decreases
by an amount dE = U dV = (
0
/2) E
2
dV , where U is the energy density of the
ﬁeld. This decrease in energy can be ascribed to the work which the ﬁeld does
on the conductor in order to make it expand. This work is dW = p Adx, where
p is the force per unit area the ﬁeld exerts on the conductor. Thus, dE = dW,
from energy conservation, giving
p =
0
2
E
2
. (4.54)
This technique for calculating a force given an expression for the energy of a
system as a function of some adjustable parameter is called the principle of virtual
work, and is very useful.
We have seen that an electric ﬁeld is excluded from the inside of the conductor,
but not from the outside, giving rise to a net outward force. We can account for
this by saying that the ﬁeld exerts a negative pressure p = −(
0
/2) E
2
on the
conductor. We know that if we evacuate a metal can then the pressure diﬀerence
between the inside and the outside eventually causes it to implode. Likewise, if
we place the can in a strong electric ﬁeld then the pressure diﬀerence between the
inside and the outside will eventually cause it to explode. How big a ﬁeld do we
need before the electrostatic pressure diﬀerence is the same as that obtained by
evacuating the can? In other words, what ﬁeld exerts a negative pressure of one
atmosphere (i.e., 10
5
newtons per meter squared) on conductors? The answer is
a ﬁeld of strength E ∼ 10
8
volts per meter. Fortunately, this is a rather large
ﬁeld, so there is no danger of your car exploding when you turn on the stereo!
4.4 Boundary conditions on the electric ﬁeld
What are the most general boundary conditions satisﬁed by the electric ﬁeld at
the interface between two mediums; e.g., the interface between a vacuum and a
conductor? Consider an interface P between two mediums A and B. Let us, ﬁrst
159
E
para B
E
para A
l
A
A
B
loop
E
E
perp B
perp A
P
Gaussian pillbox
of all, integrate Gauss’ law,
_
S
E dS =
1
0
_
V
ρ dV, (4.55)
over a Gaussian pillbox S of crosssectional area A whose two ends are locally
parallel to the interface. The ends of the box can be made arbitrarily close
together. In this limit, the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld out of the sides of the box is
obviously negligible. The only contribution to the ﬂux comes from the two ends.
In fact,
_
S
E dS = (E
⊥A
−E
⊥B
) A, (4.56)
where E
⊥A
is the perpendicular (to the interface) electric ﬁeld in medium A at
the interface, etc. The charge enclosed by the pillbox is simply σ A, where σ is
the sheet charge density on the interface. Note that any volume distribution of
charge gives rise to a negligible contribution to the righthand side of the above
equation in the limit where the two ends of the pillbox are very closely spaced.
Thus, Gauss’ law yields
E
⊥A
−E
⊥B
=
σ
0
(4.57)
at the interface; i.e., the presence of a charge sheet on an interface causes a
discontinuity in the perpendicular component of the electric ﬁeld. What about
160
the parallel electric ﬁeld? Let us integrate Faraday’s law,
_
C
E dl = −
∂
∂t
_
S
B dS, (4.58)
around a rectangular loop C whose long sides, length l, run parallel to the in
terface. The length of the short sides is assumed to be arbitrarily small. The
dominant contribution to the loop integral comes from the long sides:
_
C
E dl = (E
A
−E
B
) l, (4.59)
where E
A
is the parallel (to the interface) electric ﬁeld in medium A at the
interface, etc. The ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through the loop is approximately
B
⊥
A, where B
⊥
is the component of the magnetic ﬁeld which is normal to the
loop, and A is the area of the loop. But, A →0 as the short sides of the loop are
shrunk to zero so, unless the magnetic ﬁeld becomes inﬁnite (we assume that it
does not), the ﬂux also tends to zero. Thus,
E
A
−E
B
= 0; (4.60)
i.e., there can be no discontinuity in the parallel component of the electric ﬁeld
across an interface.
4.5 Capacitors
We can store electrical charge on the surface of a conductor. However, electric
ﬁelds will be generated immediately above the surface. The conductor can only
successfully store charge if it is electrically insulated from its surroundings. Air is
a very good insulator. Unfortunately, air ceases to be an insulator when the elec
tric ﬁeld strength through it exceeds some critical value which is about E
crit
∼ 10
6
volts per meter. This phenomenon, which is called “breakdown,” is associated
with the formation of sparks. The most well known example of the breakdown of
air is during a lightning strike. Clearly, a good charge storing device is one which
holds a large amount of charge but only generates small electric ﬁelds. Such a
device is called a “capacitor.”
161
Consider two thin, parallel, conducting plates of crosssectional area A which
are separated by a small distance d (i.e., d ¸
√
A). Suppose that each plate
carries an equal and opposite charge Q. We expect this charge to spread evenly
over the plates to give an eﬀective sheet charge density σ = ±Q/A on each plate.
Suppose that the upper plate carries a positive charge and that the lower plate
carries a negative charge. According to Eq. (4.49), the ﬁeld generated by the
upper plate is normal to the plate and of magnitude
E
upper
= +
σ
2
0
above,
E
upper
= −
σ
2
0
below. (4.61)
Likewise, the ﬁeld generated by the lower plate is
E
lower
= −
σ
2
0
above,
E
lower
= +
σ
2
0
below. (4.62)
Note that we are neglecting any “leakage” of the ﬁeld at the edges of the plates.
This is reasonable if the plates are closely spaced. The total ﬁeld is the sum of
the two ﬁelds generated by the upper and lower plates. Thus, the net ﬁeld is
normal to the plates and of magnitude
E
⊥
=
σ
0
between,
E
⊥
= 0 otherwise. (4.63)
Since the electric ﬁeld is uniform, the potential diﬀerence between the plates is
simply
V = E
⊥
d =
σ d
0
. (4.64)
It is conventional to measure the capacity of a conductor, or set of conductors, to
store charge but generate small electric ﬁelds in terms of a parameter called the
“capacitance.” This is usually denoted C. The capacitance of a charge storing
162
device is simply the ratio of the charge stored to the potential diﬀerence generated
by the charge. Thus,
C =
Q
V
. (4.65)
Clearly, a good charge storing device has a high capacitance. Incidentally, ca
pacitance is measured in coulombs per volt, or farads. This is a rather unwieldy
unit since good capacitors typically have capacitances which are only about one
millionth of a farad. For a parallel plate capacitor it is clear that
C =
σ A
V
=
0
A
d
. (4.66)
Note that the capacitance only depends on geometric quantities such as the area
and spacing of the plates. This is a consequence of the superposability of elec
tric ﬁelds. If we double the charge on conductors then we double the electric
ﬁelds generated around them and we, therefore, double the potential diﬀerence
between the conductors. Thus, the potential diﬀerence between conductors is al
ways directly proportional to the charge carried; the constant of proportionality
(the inverse of the capacitance) can only depend on geometry.
Suppose that the charge ±Q on each plate is built up gradually by transferring
small amounts of charge from one plate to another. If the instantaneous charge on
the plates is ±q and an inﬁnitesimal amount of positive charge dq is transferred
from the negatively charged plate to the positively charge plate then the work
done is dW = V dq = q dq/C, where V is the instantaneous voltage diﬀerence
between the plates. Note that the voltage diﬀerence is such that it opposes any
increase in the charge on either plate. The total work done in charging the
capacitor is
W =
1
C
_
Q
0
q dq =
Q
2
2C
=
1
2
CV
2
, (4.67)
where use has been made of Eq. (4.65). The energy stored in the capacitor is the
same as the work required to charge up the capacitor. Thus,
W =
1
2
CV
2
. (4.68)
This is a general result which holds for all types of capacitor.
163
The energy of a charged parallel plate capacitor is actually stored in the elec
tric ﬁeld between the plates. This ﬁeld is of approximately constant magnitude
E
⊥
= V/d and occupies a region of volume Ad. Thus, given the energy density
of an electric ﬁeld U = (
0
/2) E
2
, the energy stored in the electric ﬁeld is
W =
0
2
V
2
d
2
Ad =
1
2
CV
2
, (4.69)
where use has been made of Eq. (4.66). Note that Eqs. (4.67) and (4.69) agree.
We all know that if we connect a capacitor across the terminals of a battery then
a transient current ﬂows as the capacitor charges up. The capacitor can then
be placed to one side and, some time later, the stored charge can be used, for
instance, to transiently light a bulb in an electrical circuit. What is interesting
here is that the energy stored in the capacitor is stored as an electric ﬁeld, so
we can think of a capacitor as a device which either stores energy in, or extracts
energy from, an electric ﬁeld.
The idea, which we discussed earlier, that an electric ﬁeld exerts a negative
pressure p = −(
0
/2) E
2
on conductors immediately suggests that the two plates
in a parallel plate capacitor attract one another with a mutual force
F =
0
2
E
2
⊥
A =
1
2
CV
2
d
. (4.70)
It is not necessary to have two oppositely charged conductors in order to make
a capacitor. Consider an isolated sphere of radius a which carries a charge Q.
The radial electric ﬁeld generated outside the sphere is given by
E
r
(r > a) =
Q
4π
0
r
2
. (4.71)
The potential diﬀerence between the sphere and inﬁnity, or, more realistically,
some large, relatively distant reservoir of charge such as the Earth, is
V =
Q
4π
0
a
. (4.72)
Thus, the capacitance of the sphere is
C =
Q
V
= 4π
0
a. (4.73)
164
The energy of a sphere when it carries a charge Q is again given by (1/2) C V
2
. It
can easily be demonstrated that this is really the energy contained in the electric
ﬁeld around the sphere.
Suppose that we have two spheres of radii a and b, respectively, which are
connected by an electric wire. The wire allows charge to move back and forth
between the spheres until they reach the same potential (with respect to inﬁnity).
Let Q be the charge on the ﬁrst sphere and Q
the charge on the second sphere.
Of course, the total charge Q
0
= Q+Q
carried by the two spheres is a conserved
quantity. It follows from Eq. (4.72) that
Q
Q
0
=
a
a +b
,
Q
Q
0
=
b
a +b
. (4.74)
Note that if one sphere is much smaller than the other one, e.g., b ¸a, then the
large sphere grabs most of the charge:
Q
Q
=
a
b
¸1. (4.75)
The ratio of the electric ﬁelds generated just above the surfaces of the two spheres
follows from Eqs. (4.71) and (4.75):
E
b
E
a
=
a
b
. (4.76)
If b ¸a then the ﬁeld just above the smaller sphere is far bigger than that above
the larger sphere. Equation (4.76) is a simple example of a far more general rule.
The electric ﬁeld above some point on the surface of a conductor is inversely
proportional to the local radius of curvature of the surface.
It is clear that if we wish to store signiﬁcant amounts of charge on a conductor
then the surface of the conductor must be made as smooth as possible. Any sharp
spikes on the surface will inevitably have comparatively small radii of curvature.
Intense local electric ﬁelds are generated in these regions. These can easily exceed
the critical ﬁeld for the break down of air, leading to sparking and the eventual
165
loss of the charge on the conductor. Sparking can also be very destructive because
the associated electric currents ﬂow through very localized regions giving rise to
intense heating.
As a ﬁnal example, consider two coaxial conducting cylinders of radii a and
b, where a < b. Suppose that the charge per unit length carried by the inner
and outer cylinders is +q and −q, respectively. We can safely assume that E =
E
r
(r) ˆ r, by symmetry (adopting standard cylindrical polar coordinates). Let us
integrate Gauss’ law over a cylinder of radius r, coaxial with the conductors, and
of length l. For a < r < b we ﬁnd that
2πrl E
r
(r) =
ql
0
, (4.77)
so
E
r
=
q
2π
0
r
(4.78)
for a < r < b. It is fairly obvious that E
r
= 0 if r is not in the range a to b. The
potential diﬀerence between the inner and outer cylinders is
V = −
_
inner
outer
E dl =
_
outer
inner
E dl
=
_
b
a
E
r
dr =
q
2π
0
_
b
a
dr
r
, (4.79)
so
V =
q
2π
0
ln
b
a
. (4.80)
Thus, the capacitance per unit length of the two cylinders is
C =
q
V
=
2π
0
lnb/a
. (4.81)
This is a particularly useful result which we shall need later on in this course.
166
4.6 Poisson’s equation
We know that in steady state we can write
E = −∇φ, (4.82)
with the scalar potential satisfying Poisson’s equation
∇
2
φ = −
ρ
0
. (4.83)
We even know the general solution to this equation:
φ(r) =
1
4π
0
_
ρ(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
. (4.84)
So, what else is there to say about Poisson’s equation? Well, consider a positive
(say) point charge in the vicinity of an uncharged, insulated, conducting sphere.
The charge attracts negative charges to the near side of the sphere and repels
positive charges to the far side. The surface charge distribution induced on the
sphere is such that it is maintained at a constant electrical potential. We now have
a problem. We cannot use formula (4.84) to work out the potential φ(r) around
the sphere, since we do not know how the charges induced on the conducting
surface are distributed. The only things which we know about the surface of
the sphere are that it is an equipotential and carries zero net charge. Clearly,
in the presence of conducting surfaces the solution (4.84) to Poisson’s equation
is completely useless. Let us now try to develop some techniques for solving
Poisson’s equation which allow us to solve real problems (which invariably involve
conductors).
4.7 The uniqueness theorem
We have already seen the great value of the uniqueness theorem for Poisson’s
equation (or Laplace’s equation) in our discussion of Helmholtz’s theorem (see
Section 3.10). Let us now examine this theorem in detail.
Consider a volume V bounded by some surface S. Suppose that we are given
the charge density ρ throughout V and the value of the scalar potential φ
S
on S.
167
Is this suﬃcient information to uniquely specify the scalar potential throughout
V ? Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the solution is not unique. Let there
be two potentials φ
1
and φ
2
which satisfy
∇
2
φ
1
= −
ρ
0
,
∇
2
φ
2
= −
ρ
0
(4.85)
throughout V , and
φ
1
= φ
S
,
φ
2
= φ
S
(4.86)
on S. We can form the diﬀerence between these two potentials:
φ
3
= φ
1
−φ
2
. (4.87)
The potential φ
3
clearly satisﬁes
∇
2
φ
3
= 0 (4.88)
throughout V , and
φ
3
= 0 (4.89)
on S.
According to vector ﬁeld theory
∇ (φ
3
∇φ
3
) = (∇φ
3
)
2
+φ
3
∇
2
φ
3
. (4.90)
Thus, using Gauss’ theorem
_
V
_
(∇φ
3
)
2
+φ
3
∇
2
φ
3
_
dV =
_
S
φ
3
∇φ
3
dS. (4.91)
But, ∇
2
φ
3
= 0 throughout V and φ
3
= 0 on S, so the above equation reduces to
_
V
(∇φ
3
)
2
dV = 0. (4.92)
168
Note that (∇φ
3
)
2
is a positive deﬁnite quantity. The only way in which the
volume integral of a positive deﬁnite quantity can be zero is if that quantity itself
is zero throughout the volume. This is not necessarily the case for a nonpositive
deﬁnite quantity; we could have positive and negative contributions from various
regions inside the volume which cancel one another out. Thus, since (∇φ
3
)
2
is
positive deﬁnite it follows that
φ
3
= constant (4.93)
throughout V . However, we know that φ
3
= 0 on S, so we get
φ
3
= 0 (4.94)
throughout V . In other words,
φ
1
= φ
2
(4.95)
throughout V and on S. Our initial assumption that φ
1
and φ
2
are two diﬀerent
solutions of Laplace’s equations, satisfying the same boundary conditions, turns
out to be incorrect.
The fact that the solutions to Poisson’s equation are unique is very useful.
It means that if we ﬁnd a solution to this equation—no matter how contrived
the derivation—then this is the only possible solution. One immediate use of the
uniqueness theorem is to prove that the electric ﬁeld inside an empty cavity in a
conductor is zero. Recall that our previous proof of this was rather involved, and
was also not particularly rigorous (see Section 4.3). We know that the interior
surface of the conductor is at some constant potential V , say. So, we have φ = V
on the boundary of the cavity and ∇
2
φ = 0 inside the cavity (since it contains
no charges). One rather obvious solution to these equations is φ = V throughout
the cavity. Since the solutions to Poisson’s equation are unique this is the only
solution. Thus,
E = −∇φ = −∇V = 0 (4.96)
inside the cavity.
Suppose that some volume V contains a number of conductors. We know that
the surface of each conductor is an equipotential, but, in general, we do not know
what potential each surface is at (unless we are speciﬁcally told that it is earthed,
169
etc.). However, if the conductors are insulated it is plausible that we might
know the charge on each conductor. Suppose that there are N conductors, each
carrying a charge Q
i
(i = 1 to N), and suppose that the region V containing these
conductors is ﬁlled by a known charge density ρ and bounded by some surface S
which is either inﬁnity or an enclosing conductor. Is this enough information to
uniquely specify the electric ﬁeld throughout V ?
Well, suppose that it is not enough information, so that there are two ﬁelds
E
1
and E
2
which satisfy
∇ E
1
=
ρ
0
,
∇ E
2
=
ρ
0
(4.97)
throughout V , with
_
S
i
E
1
dS
i
=
Q
i
0
,
_
S
i
E
2
dS
i
=
Q
i
0
(4.98)
on the surface of the ith conductor, and, ﬁnally,
_
S
E
1
dS
i
=
Q
total
0
,
_
S
E
2
dS
i
=
Q
total
0
(4.99)
over the bounding surface, where
Q
total
=
N
i=1
Q
i
+
_
V
ρ dV (4.100)
is the total charge contained in volume V .
Let us form the diﬀerence ﬁeld
E
3
= E
1
−E
2
. (4.101)
170
It is clear that
∇ E
3
= 0 (4.102)
throughout V , and
_
S
i
E
3
dS
i
= 0 (4.103)
for all i, with
_
S
E
3
dS = 0. (4.104)
Now, we know that each conductor is at a constant potential, so if
E
3
= −∇φ
3
, (4.105)
then φ
3
is a constant on the surface of each conductor. Furthermore, if the outer
surface S is inﬁnity then φ
1
= φ
2
= φ
3
= 0 on this surface. If the outer surface
is an enclosing conductor then φ
3
is a constant on this surface. Either way, φ
3
is
constant on S.
Consider the vector identity
∇ (φ
3
E
3
) = φ
3
∇ E
3
+E
3
∇φ
3
. (4.106)
We have ∇ E
3
= 0 throughout V and ∇φ
3
= −E
3
, so the above identity reduces
to
∇ (φ
3
E
3
) = −E
2
3
(4.107)
throughout V . Integrating over V and making use of Gauss’ theorem yields
_
V
E
2
3
dV = −
N
i=1
_
S
i
φ
3
E
3
dS
i
−
_
S
φ
3
E
3
dS. (4.108)
However, φ
3
is a constant on the surfaces S
i
and S. So, making use of Eqs. (4.103)
and (4.104), we obtain
_
V
E
2
3
dV = 0. (4.109)
171
Of course, E
2
3
is a positive deﬁnite quantity, so the above relation implies that
E
3
= 0 (4.110)
throughout V ; i.e., the ﬁelds E
1
and E
2
are identical throughout V .
It is clear that, for a general electrostatic problem involving charges and con
ductors, if we are given either the potential at the surface of each conductor or
the charge carried by each conductor (plus the charge density throughout the
volume, etc.) then we can uniquely determine the electric ﬁeld. There are many
other uniqueness theorems which generalize this result still further; i.e., we could
be given the potential of some of the conductors and the charge carried by the
others and the solution would still be unique.
4.8 The classical image problem
So, how do we actually solve Poisson’s equation,
∂
2
φ
∂x
2
+
∂
2
φ
∂y
2
+
∂
2
φ
∂z
2
= −
ρ(x, y, z)
0
, (4.111)
in practice? In general, the answer is that we use a computer. However, there
are a few situations, possessing a high degree of symmetry, where it is possible
to ﬁnd analytic solutions. Let us discuss some of these solutions.
Suppose that we have a point charge q held a distance d from an inﬁnite,
grounded, conducting plate. Let the plate lie in the xy plane and suppose that
the point charge is located at coordinates (0, 0, d). What is the scalar potential
above the plane? This is not a simple question because the point charge induces
surface charges on the plate, and we do not know how these are distributed.
What do we know in this problem? We know that the conducting plate is
an equipotential. In fact, the potential of the plate is zero, since it is grounded.
We also know that the potential at inﬁnity is zero (this is our usual boundary
condition for the scalar potential). Thus, we need to solve Poisson’s equation in
the region z > 0, for a single point charge q at position (0, 0, d), subject to the
172
boundary conditions
φ(z = 0) = 0, (4.112)
and
φ →∞ (4.113)
as x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
→ ∞. Let us forget about the real problem, for a minute, and
concentrate on a slightly diﬀerent one. We refer to this as the analogue problem.
In the analogue problem we have a charge q located at (0, 0, d) and a charge −q
located at (0, 0, d) with no conductors present. We can easily ﬁnd the scalar
potential for this problem, since we know where all the charges are located. We
get
φ
analogue
(x, y, z) =
1
4π
0
_
q
_
x
2
+y
2
+ (z −d)
2
−
q
_
x
2
+y
2
+ (z +d)
2
_
.
(4.114)
Note, however, that
φ
analogue
(z = 0) = 0, (4.115)
and
φ
analogue
→0 (4.116)
as x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
→ ∞. In addition, φ
analogue
satisﬁes Poisson’s equation for a
charge at (0, 0, d), in the region z > 0. Thus, φ
analogue
is a solution to the
problem posed earlier, in the region z > 0. Now, the uniqueness theorem tells
us that there is only one solution to Poisson’s equation which satisﬁes a given,
wellposed set of boundary conditions. So, φ
analogue
must be the correct potential
in the region z > 0. Of course, φ
analogue
is completely wrong in the region z < 0.
We know this because the grounded plate shields the region z < 0 from the point
charge, so that φ = 0 in this region. Note that we are leaning pretty heavily on
the uniqueness theorem here! Without this theorem, it would be hard to convince
a skeptical person that φ = φ
analogue
is the correct solution in the region z > 0.
Now that we know the potential in the region z > 0, we can easily work out the
distribution of charges induced on the conducting plate. We already know that
the relation between the electric ﬁeld immediately above a conducting surface
and the density of charge on the surface is
E
⊥
=
σ
0
. (4.117)
173
In this case,
E
⊥
= E
z
(z = 0
+
) = −
∂φ(z = 0
+
)
∂z
= −
∂φ
analogue
(z = 0
+
)
∂z
, (4.118)
so
σ = −
0
∂φ
analogue
(z = 0
+
)
∂z
. (4.119)
It follows from Eq. (4.114) that
∂φ
∂z
=
q
4π
0
_
−(z −d)
[x
2
+y
2
+ (z −d)
2
]
3/2
+
(z +d)
[x
2
+y
2
+ (z +d)
2
]
3/2
_
, (4.120)
so
σ(x, y) = −
qd
2π(x
2
+y
2
+d
2
)
3/2
. (4.121)
Clearly, the charge induced on the plate has the opposite sign to the point charge.
The charge density on the plate is also symmetric about the zaxis, and is largest
where the plate is closest to the point charge. The total charge induced on the
plate is
Q =
_
x−y plane
σ dS, (4.122)
which yields
Q = −
qd
2π
_
∞
0
2πr dr
(r
2
+d
2
)
3/2
, (4.123)
where r
2
= x
2
+y
2
. Thus,
Q = −
qd
2
_
∞
0
dk
(k +d
2
)
3/2
= qd
_
1
(k +d
2
)
1/2
_
∞
0
= −q. (4.124)
So, the total charge induced on the plate is equal and opposite to the point charge
which induces it.
Our point charge induces charges of the opposite sign on the conducting plate.
This, presumably, gives rise to a force of attraction between the charge and the
plate. What is this force? Well, since the potential, and, hence, the electric ﬁeld,
in the vicinity of the point charge is the same as in the analogue problem then
174
the force on the charge must be the same as well. In the analogue problem there
are two charges ±q a net distance 2d apart. The force on the charge at position
(0, 0, d) (i.e., the real charge) is
F = −
1
4π
0
q
2
(2d)
2
ˆ z. (4.125)
What, ﬁnally, is the potential energy of the system. For the analogue problem
this is just
W
analogue
= −
1
4π
0
q
2
2d
. (4.126)
Note that the ﬁelds on opposite sides of the conducting plate are mirror images of
one another in the analogue problem. So are the charges (apart from the change
in sign). This is why the technique of replacing conducting surfaces by imaginary
charges is called “the method of images.” We know that the potential energy of
a set of charges is equivalent to the energy stored in the electric ﬁeld. Thus,
W =
0
2
_
all space
E
2
dV. (4.127)
In the analogue problem the ﬁelds on either side of the xy plane are mirror
images of one another, so E
2
(x, y, z) = E
2
(x, y, −z). It follows that
W
analogue
= 2
0
2
_
z>0
E
2
analogue
dV. (4.128)
In the real problem
E(z > 0) = E
analogue
(z > 0),
E(z < 0) = 0. (4.129)
So,
W =
0
2
_
z>0
E
2
dV =
0
2
_
z>0
E
2
analogue
dV =
1
2
W
analogue
, (4.130)
giving
W = −
1
4π
0
q
2
4d
. (4.131)
175
There is another method by which we can obtain the above result. Suppose
that the charge is gradually moved towards the plate along the zaxis from inﬁnity
until it reaches position (0, 0, d). How much work is required to achieve this?
We know that the force of attraction acting on the charge is
F
z
= −
1
4π
0
q
2
4z
2
. (4.132)
Thus, the work required to move this charge by dz is
dW = −F
z
dz =
1
4π
0
q
2
4z
2
dz. (4.133)
The total work needed to move the charge from z = ∞ to z = d is
W =
1
4π
0
_
d
∞
q
2
4z
2
dz =
1
4π
0
_
−
q
2
4z
_
d
∞
= −
1
4π
0
q
2
4d
. (4.134)
Of course, this work is equivalent to the potential energy we evaluated earlier,
and is, in turn, the same as the energy contained in the electric ﬁeld.
There are many diﬀerent image problems, each of which involves replacing a
conductor (e.g., a sphere) with an imaginary charge (or charges) which mimics
the electric ﬁeld in some region (but not everywhere). Unfortunately, we do not
have time to discuss any more of these problems.
4.9 Complex analysis
Let us now investigate another “trick” for solving Poisson’s equation (actually it
only solves Laplace’s equation). Unfortunately, this method can only be applied
in two dimensions.
The complex variable is conventionally written
z = x + i y (4.135)
(z should not be confused with a zcoordinate; this is a strictly two dimensional
problem). We can write functions F(z) of the complex variable just like we would
176
write functions of a real variable. For instance,
F(z) = z
2
,
F(z) =
1
z
. (4.136)
For a given function F(z) we can substitute z = x + i y and write
F(z) = U(x, y) + i V (x, y), (4.137)
where U and V are two real two dimensional functions. Thus, if
F(z) = z
2
, (4.138)
then
F(x + i y) = (x + i y)
2
= (x
2
−y
2
) + 2 i xy, (4.139)
giving
U(x, y) = x
2
−y
2
,
V (x, y) = 2xy. (4.140)
We can deﬁne the derivative of a complex function in just the same manner
as we would deﬁne the derivative of a real function. Thus,
dF
dz
=
limδz→∞
F(z +δz) −F(z)
δz
. (4.141)
However, we now have a slight problem. If F(z) is a “well deﬁned” function (we
shall leave it to the mathematicians to specify exactly what being well deﬁned
entails: suﬃce to say that most functions we can think of are well deﬁned) then it
should not matter from which direction in the complex plane we approach z when
taking the limit in Eq. (4.141). There are, of course, many diﬀerent directions we
could approach z from, but if we look at a regular complex function, F(z) = z
2
,
say, then
dF
dz
= 2z (4.142)
177
is perfectly well deﬁned and is, therefore, completely independent of the details
of how the limit is taken in Eq. (4.141).
The fact that Eq. (4.141) has to give the same result, no matter which path
we approach z from, means that there are some restrictions on the functions U
and V in Eq. (4.137). Suppose that we approach z along the real axis, so that
δz = δx. Then,
dF
dz
=
limδx→0
U(x +δx, y) + i V (x +δx, y) −U(x, y) −i V (x, y)
δx
=
∂U
∂x
+ i
∂V
∂x
. (4.143)
Suppose that we now approach z along the imaginary axis, so that δz = i δy.
Then,
dF
dz
=
limδy→0
U(x, y +δy) + i V (x, y +δy) −U(x, y) −i V (x, y)
i δy
= −i
∂U
∂y
+
∂V
∂y
. (4.144)
If F(z) is a well deﬁned function then its derivative must also be well deﬁned,
which implies that the above two expressions are equivalent. This requires that
∂U
∂x
=
∂V
∂y
,
∂V
∂x
= −
∂U
∂y
. (4.145)
These are called the CauchyRiemann equations and are, in fact, suﬃcient to
ensure that all possible ways of taking the limit (4.141) give the same answer.
So far, we have found that a general complex function F(z) can be written
F(z) = U(x, y) + i V (x, y), (4.146)
where z = x +i y. If F(z) is well deﬁned then U and V automatically satisfy the
CauchyRiemann equations:
∂U
∂x
=
∂V
∂y
,
178
∂V
∂x
= −
∂U
∂y
. (4.147)
But, what has all of this got to do with electrostatics? Well, we can combine the
two CauchyRiemann relations. We get
∂
2
U
∂x
2
=
∂
∂x
∂V
∂y
=
∂
∂y
∂V
∂x
= −
∂
∂y
∂U
∂y
, (4.148)
and
∂
2
V
∂x
2
= −
∂
∂x
∂U
∂y
= −
∂
∂y
∂U
∂x
= −
∂
∂y
∂V
∂y
, (4.149)
which reduce to
∂
2
U
∂x
2
+
∂
2
U
∂y
2
= 0,
∂
2
V
∂x
2
+
∂
2
V
∂y
2
= 0. (4.150)
Thus, both U and V automatically satisfy Laplace’s equation in two dimensions;
i.e., both U and V are possible two dimensional scalar potentials in free space.
Consider the two dimensional gradients of U and V :
∇U =
_
∂U
∂x
,
∂U
∂y
_
,
∇V =
_
∂V
∂x
,
∂V
∂y
_
. (4.151)
Now
∇U ∇V =
∂U
∂x
∂V
∂x
+
∂U
∂y
∂V
∂y
. (4.152)
It follows from the CauchyRiemann equations that
∇U ∇V =
∂V
∂y
∂V
∂x
−
∂V
∂x
∂V
∂y
= 0. (4.153)
179
Thus, the contours of U are everywhere perpendicular to the contours of V . It
follows that if U maps out the contours of some free space scalar potential then
V indicates the directions of the associated electric ﬁeld lines, and vice versa.
For every well deﬁned complex function F(z) we can think of, we get two
sets of free space potentials and the associated electric ﬁeld lines. For example,
consider the function F(z) = z
2
, for which
U = x
2
−y
2
,
V = 2xy. (4.154)
These are, in fact, the equations of two sets of orthogonal hyperboloids. So,
y
x
V
U
U = 1
U = 1
U = 0
U = 1
U = 1
U = 0
U(x, y) (the solid lines in the ﬁgure) might represent the contours of some scalar
potential and V (x, y) (the dashed lines in the ﬁgure) the associated electric ﬁeld
lines, or vice versa. But, how could we actually generate a hyperboloidal poten
tial? This is easy. Consider the contours of U at level ±1. These could represent
the surfaces of four hyperboloid conductors maintained at potentials ±1. The
scalar potential in the region between these conductors is given by 1 U(x, y) and
the associated electric ﬁeld lines follow the contours of V (x, y). Note that
E
x
= −
∂φ
∂x
= −1
∂U
∂x
= −21x (4.155)
180
Thus, the xcomponent of the electric ﬁeld is directly proportional to the distance
from the xaxis. Likewise, for the ycomponent of the ﬁeld. This property can
be exploited to make devices (called quadrupole electrostatic lenses) which are
useful for focusing particle beams.
We can think of the set of all possible well deﬁned complex functions as a
reference library of solutions to Laplace’s equation in two dimensions. We have
only considered a single example but there are, of course, very many complex
functions which generate interesting potentials. For instance, F(z) = z
1/2
gener
ates the potential around a semiinﬁnite, thin, grounded, conducting plate placed
in an external ﬁeld, whereas F(z) = z
3/2
yields the potential outside a grounded
rectangular conducting corner under similar circumstances.
4.10 Separation of variables
The method of images and complex analysis are two rather elegant techniques for
solving Poisson’s equation. Unfortunately, they both have an extremely limited
range of application. The ﬁnal technique we shall discuss in this course, namely,
the separation of variables, is somewhat messy but possess a far wider range of
application. Let us examine a speciﬁc example.
Consider two semiinﬁnite, grounded, conducting plates lying parallel to the
xz plane, one at y = 0, and the other at y = π. The left end, at x = 0, is closed
oﬀ by an inﬁnite strip insulated from the two plates and maintained at a speciﬁed
potential φ
0
(y). What is the potential in the region between the plates?
y = 0
y = π
x = 0
x
y
plate
181
We ﬁrst of all assume that the potential is zindependent, since everything
else in the problem is. This reduces the problem to two dimensions. Poisson’s
equation is written
∂
2
φ
∂x
2
+
∂
2
φ
∂y
2
= 0 (4.156)
in the vacuum region between the conductors. The boundary conditions are
φ(x, 0) = 0, (4.157a)
φ(x, π) = 0 (4.157b)
for x > 0, since the two plates are earthed, plus
φ(0, y) = φ
0
(y) (4.158)
for 0 ≤ y ≤ π, and
φ(x, y) →0 (4.159)
as x →∞. The latter boundary condition is our usual one for the scalar potential
at inﬁnity.
The central assumption in the method of separation of variables is that a
multidimensional potential can be written as the product of onedimensional
potentials, so that
φ(x, y) = X(x)Y (y). (4.160)
The above solution is obviously a very special one, and is, therefore, only likely
to satisfy a very small subset of possible boundary conditions. However, it turns
out that by adding together lots of diﬀerent solutions of this form we can match
to general boundary conditions.
Substituting (4.160) into (4.156), we obtain
Y
d
2
Y
dx
2
+X
d
2
Y
dy
2
= 0. (4.161)
Let us now separate the variables; i.e., let us collect all of the xdependent terms
on one side of the equation, and all of the ydependent terms on the other side.
Thus,
1
X
d
2
X
dx
2
= −
1
Y
d
2
Y
dy
2
. (4.162)
182
This equation has the form
f(x) = g(y), (4.163)
where f and g are general functions. The only way in which the above equation
can be satisﬁed, for general x and y, is if both sides are equal to the same constant.
Thus,
1
X
d
2
X
dx
2
= k
2
= −
1
Y
d
2
Y
dy
2
. (4.164)
The reason why we write k
2
, rather than −k
2
, will become apparent later on.
Equation (4.164) separates into two ordinary diﬀerential equations:
d
2
X
dx
2
= k
2
X,
d
2
Y
dy
2
= −k
2
Y. (4.165)
We know the general solution to these equations:
X = Aexp(kx) +Bexp(−kx),
Y = C sinky +Dcos ky, (4.166)
giving
φ = ( Aexp(kx) +Bexp(−kx) )(C sinky +Dcos ky). (4.167)
Here, A, B, C, and D are arbitrary constants. The boundary condition (4.159)
is automatically satisﬁed if A = 0 and k > 0. Note that the choice k
2
, instead of
−k
2
, in Eq. (4.164) facilitates this by making φ either grow or decay monotonically
in the xdirection instead of oscillating. The boundary condition (4.157a) is
automatically satisﬁed if D = 0. The boundary condition (4.157b) is satisﬁed
provided that
sinkπ = 0, (4.168)
which implies that k is a positive integer, n (say). So, our solution reduces to
φ(x, y) = C exp(−nx) sinny, (4.169)
183
where B has been absorbed into C. Note that this solution is only able to satisfy
the ﬁnal boundary condition (4.158) provided φ
0
(y) is proportional to sinny.
Thus, at ﬁrst sight, it would appear that the method of separation of variables
only works for a very special subset of boundary conditions. However, this is not
the case.
Now comes the clever bit! Since Poisson’s equation is linear, any linear com
bination of solutions is also a solution. We can therefore form a more general
solution than (4.169) by adding together lots of solutions involving diﬀerent val
ues of n. Thus,
φ(x, y) =
∞
n=1
C
n
exp(−nx) sinny, (4.170)
where the C
n
are constants. This solution automatically satisﬁes the boundary
conditions (4.157) and (4.159). The ﬁnal boundary condition (4.158) reduces to
φ(0, y) =
∞
n=1
C
n
sinny = φ
0
(y). (4.171)
The question now is what choice of the C
n
ﬁts an arbitrary function φ
0
(y)?
To answer this question we can make use of two very useful properties of the
functions sinny. Namely, that they are mutually orthogonal and form a complete
set. The orthogonality property of these functions manifests itself through the
relation
_
π
0
sinny sinn
y dy =
π
2
δ
nn
, (4.172)
where the function δ
nn
= 1 if n = n
and 0 otherwise is called a Kroenecker delta.
The completeness property of sine functions means that any general function
φ
0
(y) can always be adequately represented as a weighted sum of sine functions
with various diﬀerent n values. Multiplying both sides of Eq. (4.171) by sinn
y
and integrating over y we obtain
∞
n=1
C
n
_
π
0
sinny sinn
y dy =
_
π
0
φ
0
(y) sinn
y dy. (4.173)
184
The orthogonality relation yields
π
2
∞
n=1
C
n
δ
nn
=
π
2
C
n
=
_
π
0
φ
0
(y) sinn
y dy, (4.174)
so
C
n
=
2
π
_
π
0
φ
0
(y) sinny dy. (4.175)
Thus, we now have a general solution to the problem for any driving potential
φ
0
(y).
If the potential φ
0
(y) is constant then
C
n
=
2 φ
0
π
_
π
0
sinny dy =
2 φ
0
nπ
(1 −cos nπ), (4.176)
giving
C
n
= 0 (4.177)
for even n, and
C
n
=
4 φ
0
nπ
(4.178)
for odd n. Thus,
φ(x, y) =
4 φ
0
π
n=1,3,5
exp(−nx) sinnx
n
. (4.179)
This potential can be summed explicitly to give
φ(x, y) =
2φ
0
π
tan
−1
_
siny
sinhx
_
. (4.180)
In this form it is easy to check that Poisson’s equation is obeyed and that all of
the boundary conditions are satisﬁed.
In the above problem we write the potential as the product of one dimensional
functions. Some of these functions grow and decay monotonically (i.e., the ex
ponential functions) and the others oscillate (i.e., the sinusoidal functions). The
185
success of the method depends crucially on the orthogonality and completeness
of the oscillatory functions. A set of functions f
n
(x) is orthogonal if the integral
of the product of two diﬀerent members of the set over some range is always zero:
_
b
a
f
n
(x)f
m
(x) dx = 0, (4.181)
for n ,= m. A set of functions is complete if any other function can be expanded
as a weighted sum of them. It turns out that the scheme set out above can be
generalized to more complicated geometries. For instance, in spherical geome
try the monotonic functions are power law functions of the radial variable and
the oscillatory functions are Legendre polynomials. The latter are both mutually
orthogonal and form a complete set. There are also cylindrical, ellipsoidal, hyper
bolic, toroidal, etc. coordinates. In all cases, the associated oscillating functions
are mutually orthogonal and form a complete set. This implies that the method
of separation of variables is of quite general applicability.
4.11 Inductors
We have now completed our investigation of electrostatics. We should now move
on to magnetostatics—i.e., the study of steady magnetic ﬁelds generated by
steady currents. Let us skip this topic. It contains nothing new (it merely con
sists of the application of Amp`ere’s law and the BiotSavart law) and is also
exceptionally dull!
We have learned about resistance and capacitance. Let us now investigate
inductance. Electrical engineers like to reduce all pieces of electrical apparatus to
an equivalent circuit consisting only of e.m.f. sources (e.g., batteries), inductors,
capacitors, and resistors. Clearly, once we understand inductors we shall be ready
to apply the laws of electromagnetism to real life situations.
Consider two stationary loops of wire, labeled 1 and 2. Let us run a steady
current I
1
around the ﬁrst loop to produce a ﬁeld B
1
. Some of the ﬁeld lines of
B
1
will pass through the second loop. Let Φ
2
be the ﬂux of B
1
through loop 2:
Φ
2
=
_
loop 2
B
1
dS
2
, (4.182)
186
where dS
2
is a surface element of loop 2. This ﬂux is generally quite diﬃcult
to calculate exactly (unless the two loops have a particularly simple geometry).
However, we can infer from the BiotSavart law,
B
1
(r) =
µ
0
I
1
4π
_
loop 1
dl
1
∧ (r −r
)
[r −r
[
3
, (4.183)
that the magnitude of B
1
is proportional to the current I
1
. This is ultimately a
consequence of the linearity of Maxwell’s equations. Here, dl
1
is a line element
of loop 1 located at position vector r
. It follows that the ﬂux Φ
2
must also be
proportional to I
1
. Thus, we can write
Φ
2
= M
21
I
1
, (4.184)
where M
21
is the constant of proportionality. This constant is called the mutual
inductance of the two loops.
Let us write the ﬁeld B
1
in terms of a vector potential A
1
, so that
B
1
= ∇∧ A
1
. (4.185)
It follows from Stokes’ theorem that
Φ
2
=
_
loop 2
B
1
dS
2
=
_
loop 2
∇∧ A
1
dS
2
=
_
loop 2
A
1
dl
2
, (4.186)
where dl
2
is a line element of loop 2. However, we know that
A
1
(r) =
µ
0
I
1
4π
_
loop 1
dl
1
[r −r
[
. (4.187)
The above equation is just a special case of the more general law,
A
1
(r) =
µ
0
4π
_
all space
j(r
)
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (4.188)
for j(r
) = dl
1
I
1
/dl
1
dA and d
3
r
= dl
1
dA, where dA is the cross sectional area
of loop 1. Thus,
Φ
2
=
µ
0
I
1
4π
_
loop 1
_
loop 2
dl
1
dl
2
[r −r
[
, (4.189)
187
where r is now the position vector of the line element dl
2
of loop 2. The above
equation implies that
M
21
=
µ
0
4π
_
loop 1
_
loop 2
dl
1
dl
2
[r −r
[
. (4.190)
In fact, mutual inductances are rarely worked out from ﬁrst principles—it is
usually too diﬃcult. However, the above formula tells us two important things.
Firstly, the mutual inductance of two loops is a purely geometric quantity, having
to do with the sizes, shapes, and relative orientations of the loops. Secondly, the
integral is unchanged of we switch the roles of loops 1 and 2. In other words,
M
21
= M
12
. (4.191)
In fact, we can drop the subscripts and just call these quantities M. This is a
rather surprising result. It implies that no matter what the shapes and relative
positions of the two loops, the ﬂux through loop 2 when we run a current I
around loop 1 is exactly the same as the ﬂux through loop 1 when we send the
same current around loop 2.
We have seen that a current I ﬂowing around some loop, 1, generates a mag
netic ﬂux linking some other loop, 2. However, ﬂux is also generated through the
ﬁrst loop. As before, the magnetic ﬁeld, and, therefore, the ﬂux Φ, is proportional
to the current, so we can write
Φ = LI. (4.192)
The constant of proportionality L is called the self inductance. Like M it only
depends on the geometry of the loop.
Inductance is measured in S.I. units called henries (H); 1 henry is 1 voltsecond
per ampere. The henry, like the farad, is a rather unwieldy unit since most real
life inductors have a inductances of order a microhenry.
Consider a long solenoid of length l and radius r which has N turns per unit
length, and carries a current I. The longitudinal (i.e., directed along the axis of
the solenoid) magnetic ﬁeld within the solenoid is approximately uniform, and is
given by
B = µ
0
NI. (4.193)
188
This result is easily obtained by integrating Amp`ere’s law over a rectangular loop
whose long sides run parallel to the axis of the solenoid, one inside the solenoid
and the other outside, and whose short sides run perpendicular to the axis. The
magnetic ﬂux though each turn of the loop is Bπr
2
= µ
0
NI πr
2
. The total ﬂux
through the solenoid wire, which has Nl turns, is
Φ = Nl µ
0
NI πr
2
. (4.194)
Thus, the self inductance of the solenoid is
L =
Φ
I
= µ
0
N
2
πr
2
l. (4.195)
Note that the self inductance only depends on geometric quantities such as the
number of turns in the solenoid and the area of the coils.
Suppose that the current I ﬂowing through the solenoid changes. We have to
assume that the change is suﬃciently slow that we can neglect the displacement
current and retardation eﬀects in our calculations. This implies that the typical
timescale of the change must be much longer than the time for a light ray to
traverse the circuit. If this is the case then the above formulae remain valid.
A change in the current implies a change in the magnetic ﬂux linking the
solenoid wire, since Φ = LI. According to Faraday’s law, this change generates
an e.m.f. in the coils. By Lenz’s law, the e.m.f. is such as to oppose the change
in the current—i.e., it is a back e.m.f. We can write
V = −
dΦ
dt
= −L
dI
dt
, (4.196)
where V is the generated e.m.f.
Suppose that our solenoid has an electrical resistance R. Let us connect the
ends of the solenoid across the terminals of a battery of e.m.f. V . What is going
to happen? The equivalent circuit is shown below. The inductance and resistance
of the solenoid are represented by a perfect inductor L and a perfect resistor R
connected in series. The voltage drop across the inductor and resistor is equal
to the e.m.f. of the battery, V . The voltage drop across the resistor is simply
189
V
I
R
L
IR, whereas the voltage drop across the inductor (i.e., minus the back e.m.f.) is
LdI/dt. Here, I is the current ﬂowing through the solenoid. It follows that
V = IR +L
dI
dt
. (4.197)
This is a diﬀerential equation for the current I. We can rearrange it to give
dI
dt
=
V
L
−
R
L
I. (4.198)
The general solution is
I(t) =
V
R
+k exp(−Rt/L). (4.199)
The constant k is ﬁxed by the boundary conditions. Suppose that the battery is
connected at time t = 0, when I = 0. It follows that k = −V/R, so that
I(t) =
V
R
(1 −exp(−Rt/L) ) . (4.200)
It can be seen from the diagram that after the battery is connected the current
ramps up and attains its steady state value V/R (which comes from Ohm’s law)
on the characteristic timescale
τ =
L
R
. (4.201)
190
0
V / R
I

>
L / R
0
t >
This timescale is sometimes called the “time constant” of the circuit, or, some
what unimaginatively, the “L/R time” of the circuit.
We can now appreciate the signiﬁcance of self inductance. The back e.m.f.
generated in an inductor, as the current tries to change, eﬀectively prevents the
current from rising (or falling) much faster than the L/R time. This eﬀect is
sometimes advantageous, but often it is a great nuisance. All circuit elements
possess some self inductance, as well as some resistance, so all have a ﬁnite L/R
time. This means that when we power up a circuit the current does not jump
up instantaneously to its steady state value. Instead, the rise is spread out over
the L/R time of the circuit. This is a good thing. If the current were to rise
instantaneously then extremely large electric ﬁelds would be generated by the
sudden jump in the magnetic ﬁeld, leading, inevitably, to breakdown and electric
arcing. So, if there were no such thing as self inductance then every time you
switched an electric circuit on or oﬀ there would be a big blue ﬂash due to arcing
between conductors. Self inductance can also be a bad thing. Suppose that we
possess a fancy power supply, and we want to use it to send an electric signal down
a wire (or transmission line). Of course, the wire or transmission line will possess
both resistance and inductance, and will, therefore, have some characteristic L/R
time. Suppose that we try to send a square wave signal down the line. Since
the current in the line cannot rise or fall faster than the L/R time, the leading
and trailing edges of the signal get smoothed out over an L/R time. The typical
191
diﬀerence between the signal fed into the wire (upper trace) and that which comes
out of the other end (lower trace) is illustrated in the diagram below. Clearly,
there is little point having a fancy power supply unless you also possess a low
inductance wire or transmission line, so that the signal from the power supply
can be transmitted to some load device without serious distortion.
0
V
0
V
τ
Consider, now, two long thin solenoids, one wound on top of the other. The
length of each solenoid is l, and the common radius is r. Suppose that the
bottom coil has N
1
turns per unit length and carries a current I
1
. The magnetic
ﬂux passing through each turn of the top coil is µ
0
N
1
I
1
πr
2
, and the total ﬂux
linking the top coil is therefore Φ
2
= N
2
l µ
0
N
1
I
1
πr
2
, where N
2
is the number of
turns per unit length in the top coil. It follows that the mutual inductance of the
two coils, deﬁned Φ
2
= MI
1
, is given by
M = µ
0
N
1
N
2
πr
2
l. (4.202)
Recall that the self inductance of the bottom coil is
L
1
= µ
0
N
2
1
πr
2
l, (4.203)
and that of the top coil is
L
2
= µ
0
N
2
2
πr
2
l. (4.204)
192
Hence, the mutual inductance can be written
M =
_
L
1
L
2
. (4.205)
Note that this result depends on the assumption that all of the ﬂux produced
by one coil passes through the other coil. In reality, some of the ﬂux “leaks”
out, so that the mutual inductance is somewhat less than that given in the above
formula. We can write
M = k
_
L
1
L
2
, (4.206)
where the constant k is called the “coeﬃcient of coupling” and lies in the range
0 ≤ k ≤ 1.
Suppose that the two coils have resistances R
1
and R
2
. If the bottom coil has
an instantaneous current I
1
ﬂowing through it and a total voltage drop V
1
, then
the voltage drop due to its resistance is I
1
R. The voltage drop due to the back
e.m.f. generated by the self inductance of the coil is L
1
dI
1
/dt. There is also a
back e.m.f. due to the inductive coupling to the top coil. We know that the ﬂux
through the bottom coil due to the instantaneous current I
2
ﬂowing in the top
coil is
Φ
1
= MI
2
. (4.207)
Thus, by Faraday’s law and Lenz’s law the back e.m.f. induced in the bottom coil
is
V = −M
dI
2
dt
. (4.208)
The voltage drop across the bottom coil due to its mutual inductance with the
top coil is minus this expression. Thus, the circuit equation for the bottom coil
is
V
1
= R
1
I
1
+L
1
dI
1
dt
+M
dI
2
dt
. (4.209)
Likewise, the circuit equation for the top coil is
V
2
= R
2
I
2
+L
2
dI
2
dt
+M
dI
1
dt
. (4.210)
Here, V
2
is the total voltage drop across the top coil.
193
Suppose that we suddenly connect a battery of e.m.f. V
1
to the bottom coil
at time t = 0. The top coil is assumed to be open circuited, or connected to
a voltmeter of very high internal resistance, so that I
2
= 0. What is the e.m.f.
generated in the top coil? Since I
2
= 0, the circuit equation for the bottom coil
is
V
1
= R
1
I
1
+L
1
dI
1
dt
, (4.211)
where V
1
is constant, and I
1
(t = 0) = 0. We have already seen the solution to
this equation:
I
1
=
V
1
R
1
(1 −exp(−R
1
t/L
1
) ) . (4.212)
The circuit equation for the top coil is
V
2
= M
dI
1
dt
, (4.213)
giving
V
2
= V
1
M
L
1
exp(−R
1
t/L
1
). (4.214)
It follows from Eq. (4.206) that
V
2
= V
1
k
_
L
2
L
1
exp(−R
1
t/L
1
). (4.215)
Since L
1, 2
∝ N
2
1, 2
, we obtain
V
2
= V
1
k
N
2
N
1
exp(−R
1
t/L
1
). (4.216)
Note that V
2
(t) is discontinuous at t = 0. This is not a problem since the
resistance of the top circuit is inﬁnite, so there is no discontinuity in the current
(and, hence, in the magnetic ﬁeld). But, what about the displacement current,
which is proportional to ∂E/∂t? Surely, this is discontinuous at t = 0 (which is
clearly unphysical)? The crucial point, here, is that we have speciﬁcally neglected
the displacement current in all of our previous analysis, so it does not make much
sense to start worrying about it now. If we had retained the displacement current
in our calculations we would ﬁnd that the voltage in the top circuit jumps up, at
194
0
t >
V

>
2
1
L / R
1
t = 0, on a timescale similar to the light traverse time across the circuit (i.e., the
jump is instantaneous to all intents and purposes, but the displacement current
remains ﬁnite).
Now,
V
2
(t = 0)
V
1
= k
N
2
N
1
, (4.217)
so if N
2
¸ N
1
the voltage in the bottom circuit is considerably ampliﬁed in the
top circuit. This eﬀect is the basis for oldfashioned car ignition systems. A large
voltage spike is induced in a secondary circuit (connected to a coil with very
many turns) whenever the current in a primary circuit (connected to a coil with
not so many turns) is either switched on or oﬀ. The primary circuit is connected
to the car battery (whose e.m.f. is typically 12 volts). The switching is done by
a set of points which are mechanically opened and closed as the engine turns.
The large voltage spike induced in the secondary circuit as the points are either
opened or closed causes a spark to jump across a gap in this circuit. This spark
ignites a petrol/air mixture in one of the cylinders. You might think that the
optimum conﬁguration is to have only one turn in the primary circuit and lots
of turns in the secondary circuit, so that the ratio N
2
/N
1
is made as large as
possible. However, this is not the case. Most of the magnetic ﬁeld lines generated
by a single turn primary coil are likely to miss the secondary coil altogether.
This means that the coeﬃcient of coupling k is small, which reduces the voltage
195
induced in the secondary circuit. Thus, you need a reasonable number of turns
in the primary coil in order to localize the induced magnetic ﬁeld so that it links
eﬀectively with the secondary coil.
4.12 Magnetic energy
Suppose that at t = 0 a coil of inductance L and resistance R is connected across
the terminals of a battery of e.m.f. V . The circuit equation is
V = L
dI
dt
+RI. (4.218)
The power output of the battery is V I. [Every charge q that goes around the
circuit falls through a potential diﬀerence qV . In order to raise it back to the
starting potential, so that it can perform another circuit, the battery must do
work qV . The work done per unit time (i.e., the power) is nqV , where n is the
number of charges per unit time passing a given point on the circuit. But, I = nq,
so the power output is V I.] The total work done by the battery in raising the
current in the circuit from zero at time t = 0 to I
T
at time t = T is
W =
_
T
0
V I dt. (4.219)
Using the circuit equation (4.218), we obtain
W = L
_
T
0
I
dI
dt
dt +R
_
T
0
I
2
dt, (4.220)
giving
W =
1
2
LI
2
T
+R
_
T
0
I
2
dt. (4.221)
The second term on the righthand side represents the irreversible conversion of
electrical energy into heat energy in the resistor. The ﬁrst term is the amount
of energy stored in the inductor at time T. This energy can be recovered af
ter the inductor is disconnected from the battery. Suppose that the battery is
196
disconnected at time T. The circuit equation is now
0 = L
dI
dt
+RI, (4.222)
giving
I = I
T
exp
_
−
R
L
(t −T)
_
, (4.223)
where we have made use of the boundary condition I(T) = I
T
. Thus, the current
decays away exponentially. The energy stored in the inductor is dissipated as
heat in the resistor. The total heat energy appearing in the resistor after the
battery is disconnected is
_
∞
T
I
2
Rdt =
1
2
LI
2
T
, (4.224)
where use has been made of Eq. (4.223). Thus, the heat energy appearing in
the resistor is equal to the energy stored in the inductor. This energy is actually
stored in the magnetic ﬁeld generated around the inductor.
Consider, again, our circuit with two coils wound on top of one another.
Suppose that each coil is connected to its own battery. The circuit equations are
V
1
= R
1
I
1
+L
dI
1
dt
+M
dI
2
dt
,
V
2
= R
2
I
2
+L
dI
2
dt
+M
dI
1
dt
, (4.225)
where V
1
is the e.m.f. of the battery in the ﬁrst circuit, etc. The work done by
the two batteries in increasing the currents in the two circuits from zero at time
0 to I
1
and I
2
at time T, respectively, is
W =
_
T
0
(V
1
I
1
+V
2
I
2
) dt
=
_
T
0
(R
1
I
2
1
+R
2
I
2
2
) dt +
1
2
L
1
I
2
1
+
1
2
L
2
I
2
2
+M
_
T
0
_
I
1
dI
2
dt
+I
2
dI
1
dt
_
dt. (4.226)
197
Thus,
W =
_
T
0
(R
1
I
2
1
+R
2
I
2
2
) dt
+
1
2
L
1
I
2
1
+
1
2
L
2
I
2
2
+MI
1
I
2
. (4.227)
Clearly, the total magnetic energy stored in the two coils is
W
B
=
1
2
L
1
I
2
1
+
1
2
L
2
I
2
2
+MI
1
I
2
. (4.228)
Note that the mutual inductance term increases the stored magnetic energy if
I
1
and I
2
are of the same sign—i.e., if the currents in the two coils ﬂow in the
same direction, so that they generate magnetic ﬁelds which reinforce one another.
Conversely, the mutual inductance term decreases the stored magnetic energy if
I
1
and I
2
are of the opposite sign. The total stored energy can never be negative,
otherwise the coils would constitute a power source (a negative stored energy is
equivalent to a positive generated energy). Thus,
1
2
L
1
I
2
1
+
1
2
L
2
I
2
2
+MI
1
I
2
≥ 0, (4.229)
which can be written
1
2
_
_
L
1
I
1
+
_
L
2
I
2
_
2
−I
1
I
2
(
_
L
1
L
2
−M) ≥ 0, (4.230)
assuming that I
1
I
2
< 0. It follows that
M ≤
_
L
1
L
2
. (4.231)
The equality sign corresponds to the situation where all of the ﬂux generated by
one coil passes through the other. If some of the ﬂux misses then the inequality
sign is appropriate. In fact, the above formula is valid for any two inductively
coupled circuits.
We intimated previously that the energy stored in an inductor is actually
stored in the surrounding magnetic ﬁeld. Let us now obtain an explicit formula
198
for the energy stored in a magnetic ﬁeld. Consider an ideal solenoid. The energy
stored in the solenoid when a current I ﬂows through it is
W =
1
2
LI
2
, (4.232)
where L is the self inductance. We know that
L = µ
0
N
2
πr
2
l, (4.233)
where N is the number of turns per unit length of the solenoid, r the radius, and
l the length. The ﬁeld inside the solenoid is uniform, with magnitude
B = µ
0
NI, (4.234)
and is zero outside the solenoid. Equation (4.232) can be rewritten
W =
B
2
2µ
0
V, (4.235)
where V = πr
2
l is the volume of the solenoid. The above formula strongly
suggests that a magnetic ﬁeld possesses an energy density
U =
B
2
2µ
0
. (4.236)
Let us now examine a more general proof of the above formula. Consider
a system of N circuits (labeled i = 1 to N), each carrying a current I
i
. The
magnetic ﬂux through the ith circuit is written [cf., Eq. (4.186) ]
Φ
i
=
_
B dS
i
=
_
A dl
i
, (4.237)
where B = ∇∧A, and dS
i
and dl
i
denote a surface element and a line element of
this circuit, respectively. The back e.m.f. induced in the ith circuit follows from
Faraday’s law:
V
i
= −
dΦ
i
dt
. (4.238)
199
The rate of work of the battery which maintains the current I
i
in the ith circuit
against this back e.m.f. is
P
i
= I
i
dΦ
i
dt
. (4.239)
Thus, the total work required to raise the currents in the N circuits from zero at
time 0 to I
0 i
at time T is
W =
N
i=1
_
T
0
I
i
dΦ
i
dt
dt. (4.240)
The above expression for the work done is, of course, equivalent to the total
energy stored in the magnetic ﬁeld surrounding the various circuits. This energy
is independent of the manner in which the currents are set up. Suppose, for the
sake of simplicity, that the currents are ramped up linearly, so that
I
i
= I
0 i
t
T
. (4.241)
The ﬂuxes are proportional to the currents, so they must also ramp up linearly:
Φ
i
= Φ
0 i
t
T
. (4.242)
It follows that
W =
N
i=1
_
T
0
I
0 i
Φ
0 i
t
T
2
dt, (4.243)
giving
W =
1
2
_
N
i=1
I
0 i
Φ
0 i
. (4.244)
So, if instantaneous currents I
i
ﬂow in the the N circuits, which link instantaneous
ﬂuxes Φ
i
, then the instantaneous stored energy is
W =
1
2
_
N
i=1
I
i
Φ
i
. (4.245)
200
Equations (4.237) and (4.245) imply that
W =
1
2
N
i=1
I
i
_
A dl
i
. (4.246)
It is convenient, at this stage, to replace our N line currents by N current dis
tributions of small, but ﬁnite, crosssectional area. Equation (4.246) transforms
to
W =
1
2
_
V
A j dV, (4.247)
where V is a volume which contains all of the circuits. Note that for an element
of the ith circuit j = I
i
dl
i
/dl
i
A
i
and dV = dl
i
A
i
, where A
i
is the crosssectional
area of the circuit. Now, µ
0
j = ∇∧B (we are neglecting the displacement current
in this calculation), so
W =
1
2µ
0
_
V
A ∇∧ BdV. (4.248)
According to vector ﬁeld theory,
∇ (A∧ B) = B ∇∧ A−A ∇∧ B, (4.249)
which implies that
W =
1
2µ
0
_
V
(−∇ (A∧ B) +B ∇∧ A) dV. (4.250)
Using Gauss’ theorem and B = ∇∧ A, we obtain
W = −
1
2µ
0
_
S
A∧ B dS +
1
2µ
0
_
V
B
2
dV, (4.251)
where S is the bounding surface of V . Let us take this surface to inﬁnity. It
is easily demonstrated that the magnetic ﬁeld generated by a current loop falls
of like r
−3
at large distances. The vector potential falls oﬀ like r
−2
. However,
the area of surface S only increases like r
2
. It follows that the surface integral is
negligible in the limit r →∞. Thus, the above expression reduces to
W =
_
all space
B
2
2µ
0
dV. (4.252)
201
Since this expression is valid for any magnetic ﬁeld whatsoever, we can conclude
that the energy density of a general magnetic ﬁeld is given by
U =
B
2
2µ
0
. (4.253)
4.13 Energy conservation in electromagnetism
We have seen that the energy density of an electric ﬁeld is given by
U
E
=
0
E
2
2
, (4.254)
whereas the energy density of a magnetic ﬁeld satisﬁes
U
B
=
B
2
2µ
0
. (4.255)
This suggests that the energy density of a general electromagnetic ﬁeld is
U =
0
E
2
2
+
B
2
2µ
0
. (4.256)
We are now in a position to demonstrate that the classical theory of electromag
netism conserves energy. We have already come across one conservation law in
electromagnetism:
∂ρ
∂t
+∇ j = 0. (4.257)
This is the equation of charge conservation. Integrating over some volume V
bounded by a surface S, we obtain
−
∂
∂t
_
V
ρ dV =
_
S
j dS. (4.258)
In other words, the rate of decrease of the charge contained in volume V equals
the net ﬂux of charge across surface S. This suggests that an energy conservation
law for electromagnetism should have the form
−
∂
∂t
_
V
U dV =
_
S
u dS. (4.259)
202
Here, U is the energy density of the electromagnetic ﬁeld and u is the ﬂux of
electromagnetic energy (i.e., energy [u[ per unit time, per unit crosssectional
area, passes a given point in the direction of u). According to the above equation,
the rate of decrease of the electromagnetic energy in volume V equals the net ﬂux
of electromagnetic energy across surface S.
Equation (4.259) is incomplete because electromagnetic ﬁelds can lose or gain
energy by interacting with matter. We need to factor this into our analysis. We
saw earlier (see Section 4.2) that the rate of heat dissipation per unit volume in
a conductor (the socalled ohmic heating rate) is E j. This energy is extracted
from electromagnetic ﬁelds, so the rate of energy loss of the ﬁelds in volume V
due to interaction with matter is
_
V
E j dV . Thus, Eq. (4.259) generalizes to
−
∂
∂t
_
V
U dV =
_
S
u dS +
_
V
E j dV. (4.260)
The above equation is equivalent to
∂U
∂t
+∇ u = −E j. (4.261)
Let us now see if we can derive an expression of this form from Maxwell’s equa
tions.
We start from Amp`ere’s law (including the displacement current):
∇∧ B = µ
0
j +
0
µ
0
∂E
∂t
. (4.262)
Dotting this equation with the electric ﬁeld yields
−E j = −
E ∇∧ B
µ
0
+
0
E
∂E
∂t
. (4.263)
This can be rewritten
−E j = −
E ∇∧ B
µ
0
+
∂
∂t
_
0
E
2
2
_
. (4.264)
Now, from vector ﬁeld theory
∇ (E ∧ B) = B ∇∧ E −E ∇∧ B, (4.265)
203
so
−E j = ∇
_
E ∧ B
µ
0
_
−
B ∇∧ E
µ
0
+
∂
∂t
_
0
E
2
2
_
. (4.266)
Faraday’s law yields
∇∧ E = −
∂B
∂t
, (4.267)
so
−E j = ∇
_
E ∧ B
µ
0
_
+
1
µ
0
B
∂B
∂t
+
∂
∂t
_
0
E
2
2
_
. (4.268)
This can be rewritten
−E j = ∇
_
E ∧ B
µ
0
_
+
∂
∂t
_
0
E
2
2
+
B
2
2µ
0
_
. (4.269)
Thus, we obtain the desired conservation law,
∂U
∂t
+∇ u = −E j, (4.270)
where
U =
0
E
2
2
+
B
2
2µ
0
(4.271)
is the electromagnetic energy density, and
u =
E ∧ B
µ
0
(4.272)
is the electromagnetic energy ﬂux. The latter quantity is usually called the
“Poynting ﬂux” after its discoverer.
Let us see whether our expression for the electromagnetic energy ﬂux makes
sense. We all know that if we stand in the sun we get hot (especially in Texas!).
This occurs because we absorb electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Sun.
So, radiation must transport energy. The electric and magnetic ﬁelds in elec
tromagnetic radiation are mutually perpendicular, and are also perpendicular to
the direction of propagation
ˆ
k (this is a unit vector). Furthermore, B = E/c.
204
Equation (3.232) can easily be transformed into the following relation between
the electric and magnetic ﬁelds of an electromagnetic wave:
E ∧ B =
E
2
c
ˆ
k. (4.273)
Thus, the Poynting ﬂux for electromagnetic radiation is
u =
E
2
µ
0
c
ˆ
k =
0
cE
2
ˆ
k. (4.274)
This expression tells us that electromagnetic waves transport energy along their
direction of propagation, which seems to make sense.
The energy density of electromagnetic radiation is
U =
0
E
2
2
+
B
2
2µ
0
=
0
E
2
2
+
E
2
2µ
0
c
2
=
0
E
2
, (4.275)
using B = E/c. Note that the electric and magnetic ﬁelds have equal energy
densities. Since electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light, we would
expect the energy ﬂux through one square meter in one second to equal the
energy contained in a volume of length c and unit crosssectional area; i.e., c
times the energy density. Thus,
[u[ = cU =
0
cE
2
, (4.276)
which is in accordance with Eq. (4.274).
4.14 Electromagnetic momentum
We have seen that electromagnetic waves carry energy. It turns out that they also
carry momentum. Consider the following argument, due to Einstein. Suppose
that we have a railroad car of mass M and length L which is free to move in one
dimension. Suppose that electromagnetic radiation of total energy E is emitted
from one end of the car, propagates along the length of the car, and is then
absorbed at the other end. The eﬀective mass of this radiation is m = E/c
2
205
L
M
E
E
x
(from Einstein’s famous relation E = mc
2
). At ﬁrst sight, the process described
above appears to cause the centre of mass of the system to spontaneously shift.
This violates the law of momentum conservation (assuming the railway car is
subject to no external forces). The only way in which the centre of mass of the
system can remain stationary is if the railway car moves in the opposite direction
to the direction of propagation of the radiation. In fact, if the car moves by a
distance x then the centre of mass of the system is the same before and after the
radiation pulse provided that
Mx = mL =
E
c
2
L. (4.277)
It is assumed that m ¸M in this derivation.
But, what actually causes the car to move? If the radiation possesses mo
mentum p then the car will recoil with the same momentum as the radiation is
emitted. When the radiation hits the other end of the car then it acquires mo
206
mentum p in the opposite direction, which stops the motion. The time of ﬂight
of the radiation is L/c. So, the distance traveled by a mass M with momentum
p in this time is
x = vt =
p
M
L
c
, (4.278)
giving
p = Mx
c
L
=
E
c
. (4.279)
Thus, the momentum carried by electromagnetic radiation equals its energy di
vided by the speed of light. The same result can be obtained from the well known
relativistic formula
E
2
= p
2
c
2
+m
2
c
4
(4.280)
relating the energy E, momentum p, and mass m of a particle. According to
quantum theory, electromagnetic radiation is made up of massless particles called
photons. Thus,
p =
E
c
(4.281)
for individual photons, so the same must be true of electromagnetic radiation as
a whole. If follows from Eq. (4.281) that the momentum density g of electromag
netic radiation equals its energy density over c, so
g =
U
c
=
[u[
c
2
=
0
E
2
c
. (4.282)
It is reasonable to suppose that the momentum points along the direction of the
energy ﬂow (this is obviously the case for photons), so the vector momentum
density (which gives the direction as well as the magnitude, of the momentum
per unit volume) of electromagnetic radiation is
g =
u
c
2
. (4.283)
Thus, the momentum density equals the energy ﬂux over c
2
.
Of course, the electric ﬁeld associated with an electromagnetic wave oscillates
rapidly, which implies that the previous expressions for the energy density, en
ergy ﬂux, and momentum density of electromagnetic radiation are also rapidly
207
oscillating. It is convenient to average over many periods of the oscillation (this
average is denoted ¸ )). Thus,
¸U) =
0
E
2
0
2
,
¸u) =
c
0
E
2
0
2
= c ¸U)
ˆ
k, (4.284)
¸g) =
0
E
2
0
2c
ˆ
k =
¸U)
c
ˆ
k,
where the factor 1/2 comes from averaging cos
2
ωt. Here, E
0
is the peak amplitude
of the electric ﬁeld associated with the wave.
Since electromagnetic radiation possesses momentum then it must exert a
force on bodies which absorb (or emit) radiation. Suppose that a body is placed
in a beam of perfectly collimated radiation, which it absorbs completely. The
amount of momentum absorbed per unit time, per unit crosssectional area, is
simply the amount of momentum contained in a volume of length c and unit cross
sectional area; i.e., c times the momentum density g. An absorbed momentum
per unit time, per unit area, is equivalent to a pressure. In other words, the
radiation exerts a pressure cg on the body. Thus, the “radiation pressure” is
given by
p =
0
E
2
2
= ¸U). (4.285)
So, the pressure exerted by collimated electromagnetic radiation is equal to its
average energy density.
Consider a cavity ﬁlled with electromagnetic radiation. What is the radiation
pressure exerted on the walls? In this situation the radiation propagates in all
directions with equal probability. Consider radiation propagating at an angle θ
to the local normal to the wall. The amount of such radiation hitting the wall
per unit time, per unit area, is proportional to cos θ. Moreover, the component
of momentum normal to the wall which the radiation carries is also proportional
to cos θ. Thus, the pressure exerted on the wall is the same as in Eq. (4.285),
except that it is weighted by the average of cos
2
θ over all solid angles in order to
take into account the fact that obliquely propagating radiation exerts a pressure
208
which is cos
2
θ times that of normal radiation. The average of cos
2
θ over all solid
angles is 1/3, so for isotropic radiation
p =
¸U)
3
. (4.286)
Clearly, the pressure exerted by isotropic radiation is one third of its average
energy density.
The power incident on the surface of the Earth due to radiation emitted by
the Sun is about 1300 W/m
2
. So, what is the radiation pressure? Since,
¸[u[) = c ¸U) = 1300 Wm
−2
, (4.287)
then
p = ¸U) · 4 10
−6
Nm
−2
. (4.288)
Here, the radiation is assumed to be perfectly collimated. Thus, the radiation
pressure exerted on the Earth is minuscule (one atmosphere equals about 10
5
N/m
2
). Nevertheless, this small pressure due to radiation is important in outer
space, since it is responsible for continuously sweeping dust particles out of the
solar system. It is quite common for comets to exhibit two separate tails. One
(called the “gas tail”) consists of ionized gas, and is swept along by the solar
wind (a stream of charged particles and magnetic ﬁeld lines emitted by the Sun).
The other (called the “dust tail”) consists of uncharged dust particles, and is
swept radially outward from the Sun by radiation pressure. Two separate tails
are observed if the local direction of the solar wind is not radially outward from
the Sun (which is quite often the case).
The radiation pressure from sunlight is very weak. However, that produced
by laser beams can be enormous (far higher than any conventional pressure which
has ever been produced in a laboratory). For instance, the lasers used in Inertial
Conﬁnement Fusion (e.g., the NOVA experiment in Laurence Livermore National
Laboratory) typically have energy ﬂuxes of 10
18
Wm
−2
. This translates to a
radiation pressure of about 10
4
atmospheres. Obviously, it would not be a good
idea to get in the way of one of these lasers!
209
4.15 The Hertzian dipole
Consider two spherical conductors connected by a wire. Suppose that electric
charge ﬂows periodically back and forth between the spheres. Let q be the charge
on one of the conductors. The system has zero net charge, so the charge on the
other conductor is −q. Let
q(t) = q
0
sinωt. (4.289)
We expect the oscillating current ﬂowing in the wire connecting the two spheres
to generate electromagnetic radiation (see Section 3.23). Let us consider the
simple case where the length of the wire is small compared to the wavelength of
the emitted radiation. If this is the case then the current I ﬂowing between the
conductors has the same phase along the whole length of the wire. It follows that
I(t) =
dq
dt
= I
0
cos ωt, (4.290)
where I
0
= ωq
0
. This type of antenna is called a Hertzian dipole, after the
German physicist Heinrich Hertz.
The magnetic vector potential generated by a current distribution j(r) is
given by the well known formula
A(r, t) =
µ
0
4π
_
[j]
[r −r
[
d
3
r
, (4.291)
where
[f] = f(r
, t −[r −r
[/c). (4.292)
Suppose that the wire is aligned along the zaxis and extends from z = −l/2 to
z = l/2. For a wire of negligible thickness we can replace j(r
, t −[r −r
[/c) d
3
r
by I(r
, t −[r −r
[/c) dz
ˆ z. Thus, A(r, t) = A
z
(r, t) ˆ z and
A
z
(r, t) =
µ
0
4π
_
l/2
−l/2
I(z
, t −[r −z
ˆ z[/c)
[r −z
ˆ z[
dz
. (4.293)
In the region r ¸l
[r −z
ˆ z[ · r (4.294)
210
and
t −[r −z
ˆ z[/c · t −r/c. (4.295)
The maximum error in the latter approximation is ∆t ∼ l/c. This error (which
is a time) must be much less than a period of oscillation of the emitted radiation,
otherwise the phase of the radiation will be wrong. So
l
c
¸
2π
ω
, (4.296)
which implies that l ¸ λ, where λ = 2π c/ω is the wavelength of the emitted
radiation. However, we have already assumed that the length of the wire l is much
less than the wavelength of the radiation, so the above inequality is automatically
satisﬁed. Thus, in the “far ﬁeld” region, r ¸λ, we can write
A
z
(r, t) ·
µ
0
4π
_
l/2
−l/2
I(z
, t −r/c)
r
dz
. (4.297)
This integral is easy to perform since the current is uniform along the length of
the wire. So,
A
z
(r, t) ·
µ
0
l
4π
I(t −r/c)
r
. (4.298)
The scalar potential is most conveniently evaluated using the Lorentz gauge
condition
∇ A = −
0
µ
0
∂φ
∂t
. (4.299)
Now,
∇ A =
∂A
z
∂z
·
µ
0
l
4π
∂I(t −r/c)
∂t
_
−
z
r
2
c
_
+O
_
1
r
2
_
(4.300)
to leading order in r
−1
. Thus,
φ(r, t) ·
l
4π
0
c
z
r
I(t −r/c)
r
. (4.301)
Given the vector and scalar potentials, Eqs. (4.298) and (4.301), respectively,
we can evaluate the associated electric and magnetic ﬁelds using
E = −
∂A
∂t
−∇φ,
211
B = ∇∧ A. (4.302)
Note that we are only interested in radiation ﬁelds, which fall oﬀ like r
−1
with
increasing distance from the source. It is easily demonstrated that
E · −
ωlI
0
4π
0
c
2
sinθ
sin[ω(t −r/c)]
r
ˆ
θ (4.303)
and
B · −
ωlI
0
4π
0
c
3
sinθ
sin[ω(t −r/c)]
r
ˆ
φ. (4.304)
Here, (r, θ, φ) are standard spherical polar coordinates aligned along the zaxis.
The above expressions for the far ﬁeld (i.e., r ¸λ) electromagnetic ﬁelds gener
ated by a localized oscillating current are also easily derived from Eqs. (3.320) and
(3.321). Note that the ﬁelds are symmetric in the azimuthal angle φ. There is no
radiation along the axis of the oscillating dipole (i.e., θ = 0), and the maximum
emission is in the plane perpendicular to this axis (i.e., θ = π/2).
The average power crossing a spherical surface S (whose radius is much greater
than λ) is
P
rad
=
_
S
¸u) dS, (4.305)
where the average is over a single period of oscillation of the wave, and the
Poynting ﬂux is given by
u =
E ∧ B
µ
0
=
ω
2
l
2
I
2
0
16π
2
0
c
3
sin
2
[ω(t −r/c)]
sin
2
θ
r
2
ˆ r. (4.306)
It follows that
¸u) =
ω
2
l
2
I
2
0
32π
2
0
c
3
sin
2
θ
r
2
ˆ r. (4.307)
Note that the energy ﬂux is radially outwards from the source. The total power
ﬂux across S is given by
P
rad
=
ω
2
l
2
I
2
0
32π
2
0
c
3
_
2π
0
dφ
_
π
0
sin
2
θ
r
2
r
2
sin
2
θ dθ. (4.308)
212
Thus,
P
rad
=
ω
2
l
2
I
2
0
12π
0
c
3
. (4.309)
The total ﬂux is independent of the radius of S, as is to be expected if energy is
conserved.
Recall that for a resistor of resistance R the average ohmic heating power is
P
heat
= ¸I
2
R) =
1
2
I
2
0
R, (4.310)
assuming that I = I
0
cos ωt. It is convenient to deﬁne the “radiation resistance”
of a Hertzian dipole antenna:
R
rad
=
P
rad
I
2
0
/2
, (4.311)
so that
R
rad
=
2π
3
0
c
_
l
λ
_
2
, (4.312)
where λ = 2π c/ω is the wavelength of the radiation. In fact,
R
rad
= 789
_
l
λ
_
2
ohms. (4.313)
In the theory of electrical circuits, antennas are conventionally represented as
resistors whose resistance is equal to the characteristic radiation resistance of
the antenna plus its real resistance. The power loss I
2
0
R
rad
/2 associated with
the radiation resistance is due to the emission of electromagnetic radiation. The
power loss I
2
0
R/2 associated with the real resistance is due to ohmic heating of
the antenna.
Note that the formula (4.313) is only valid for l ¸ λ. This suggests that
R
rad
¸R for most Hertzian dipole antennas; i.e., the radiated power is swamped
by the ohmic losses. Thus, antennas whose lengths are much less than that of
the emitted radiation tend to be extremely ineﬃcient. In fact, it is necessary to
have l ∼ λ in order to obtain an eﬃcient antenna. The simplest practical antenna
213
is the “halfwave antenna,” for which l = λ/2. This can be analyzed as a series
of Hertzian dipole antennas stacked on top of one another, each slightly out of
phase with its neighbours. The characteristic radiation resistance of a halfwave
antenna is
R
rad
=
2.44
4π
0
c
= 73 ohms. (4.314)
Antennas can be used to receive electromagnetic radiation. The incoming
wave induces a voltage in the antenna which can be detected in an electrical circuit
connected to the antenna. In fact, this process is equivalent to the emission of
electromagnetic waves by the antenna viewed in reverse. It is easily demonstrated
that antennas most readily detect electromagnetic radiation incident from those
directions in which they preferentially emit radiation. Thus, a Hertzian dipole
antenna is unable to detect radiation incident along its axis, and most eﬃciently
detects radiation incident in the plane perpendicular to this axis. In the theory
of electrical circuits, a receiving antenna is represented as an e.m.f in series with
a resistor. The e.m.f., V
0
cos ωt, represents the voltage induced in the antenna by
the incoming wave. The resistor, R
rad
, represents the power reradiated by the
antenna (here, the real resistance of the antenna is neglected). Let us represent
the detector circuit as a single load resistor R
load
connected in series with the
antenna. The question is: how can we choose R
load
so that the maximum power
is extracted from the wave and transmitted to the load resistor? According to
Ohm’s law:
V
0
cos ωt = I
0
cos ωt (R
rad
+R
load
), (4.315)
where I = I
0
cos ωt is the current induced in the circuit.
The power input to the circuit is
P
in
= ¸V I) =
V
2
0
2(R
rad
+R
load
)
. (4.316)
The power transferred to the load is
P
load
= ¸I
2
R
load
) =
R
load
V
2
0
2(R
rad
+R
load
)
2
. (4.317)
214
The power reradiated by the antenna is
P
rad
= ¸I
2
R
rad
) =
R
rad
V
2
0
2(R
rad
+R
load
)
2
. (4.318)
Note that P
in
= P
load
+ P
rad
. The maximum power transfer to the load occurs
when
∂P
load
∂R
load
=
V
2
0
2
_
R
load
−R
rad
(R
rad
+R
load
)
3
_
= 0. (4.319)
Thus, the maximum transfer rate corresponds to
R
load
= R
res
. (4.320)
In other words, the resistance of the load circuit must match the radiation resis
tance of the antenna. For this optimum case,
P
load
= P
rad
=
V
2
0
8R
rad
=
P
in
2
. (4.321)
So, in the optimum case half of the power absorbed by the antenna is immediately
reradiated. Clearly, an antenna which is receiving electromagnetic radiation is
also emitting it. This is how the BBC catch people who do not pay their television
license fee in England. They have vans which can detect the radiation emitted by
a TV aerial whilst it is in use (they can even tell which channel you are watching!).
For a Hertzian dipole antenna interacting with an incoming wave whose elec
tric ﬁeld has an amplitude E
0
we expect
V
0
= E
0
l. (4.322)
Here, we have used the fact that the wavelength of the radiation is much longer
than the length of the antenna. We have also assumed that the antenna is properly
aligned (i.e., the radiation is incident perpendicular to the axis of the antenna).
The Poynting ﬂux of the incoming wave is
¸u
in
) =
0
cE
2
0
2
, (4.323)
215
whereas the power transferred to a properly matched detector circuit is
P
load
=
E
2
0
l
2
8R
rad
. (4.324)
Consider an idealized antenna in which all incoming radiation incident on some
area A
eﬀ
is absorbed and then magically transferred to the detector circuit with
no reradiation. Suppose that the power absorbed from the idealized antenna
matches that absorbed from the real antenna. This implies that
P
load
= ¸u
in
)A
eﬀ
. (4.325)
The quantity A
eﬀ
is called the “eﬀective area” of the antenna; it is the area of
the idealized antenna which absorbs as much net power from the incoming wave
as the actual antenna. Thus,
P
load
=
E
2
0
l
2
8R
rad
=
0
cE
2
0
2
A
eﬀ
, (4.326)
giving
A
eﬀ
=
l
2
4
0
cR
rad
=
3
8π
λ
2
. (4.327)
It is clear that the eﬀective area of a Hertzian dipole antenna is of order the
wavelength squared of the incoming radiation.
For a properly aligned halfwave antenna
A
eﬀ
= 0.13 λ
2
. (4.328)
Thus, the antenna, which is essentially one dimensional with length λ/2, acts as
if it is two dimensional, with width 0.26 λ, as far as its absorption of incoming
electromagnetic radiation is concerned.
4.16 AC circuits
Alternating current (AC) circuits are made up of e.m.f. sources and three diﬀerent
types of passive element; resistors, inductors, and capacitors, Resistors satisfy
Ohm’s law:
V = IR, (4.329)
216
where R is the resistance, I is the current ﬂowing through the resistor, and V is
the voltage drop across the resistor (in the direction in which the current ﬂows).
Inductors satisfy
V = L
dL
dt
, (4.330)
where L is the inductance. Finally, capacitors obey
V =
q
C
=
_
t
0
I dt
_
C, (4.331)
where C is the capacitance, q is the charge stored on the plate with the more
positive potential, and I = 0 for t < 0. Note that any passive component of a
real electrical circuit can always be represented as a combination of ideal resistors,
inductors, and capacitors.
Let us consider the classic LCR circuit, which consists of an inductor L, a
capacitor C, and a resistor R, all connected in series with an e.m.f. source V .
The circuit equation is obtained by setting the input voltage V equal to the sum
of the voltage drops across the three passive elements in the circuit. Thus,
V = IR +L
dI
dt
+
_
t
0
I dt
_
C. (4.332)
This is an integrodiﬀerential equation which, in general, is quite tricky to solve.
Suppose, however, that both the voltage and the current oscillate at some angular
frequency ω, so that
V (t) = V
0
exp(i ωt),
I(t) = I
0
exp(i ωt), (4.333)
where the physical solution is understood to be the real part of the above expres
sions. The assumed behaviour of the voltage and current is clearly relevant to
electrical circuits powered by the mains voltage (which oscillates at 60 hertz).
Equations (4.332) and (4.333) yield
V
0
exp(i ωt) = I
0
exp(i ωt) R +Li ω I
0
exp(i ωt) +
I
0
exp(i ωt)
i ωC
, (4.334)
217
giving
V
0
= I
0
_
i ωL +
1
i ωC
+R
_
. (4.335)
It is helpful to deﬁne the “impedance” of the circuit;
Z =
V
I
= i ωL +
1
i ωC
+R. (4.336)
Impedance is a generalization of the concept of resistance. In general, the impedance
of an AC circuit is a complex quantity.
The average power output of the e.m.f. source is
P = ¸V (t)I(t)), (4.337)
where the average is taken over one period of the oscillation. Let us, ﬁrst of all,
calculate the power using real (rather than complex) voltages and currents. We
can write
V (t) = V
0
cos ωt,
I(t) = I
0
cos(ωt −θ), (4.338)
where θ is the phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage. It follows that
P = V
0
I
0
_
ωt=2π
ωt=0
cos ωt cos(ωt −θ)
d(ωt)
2π
= V
0
I
0
_
ωt=2π
ωt=0
cos ωt (cos ωt cos θ + sinωt sinθ)
d(ωt)
2π
, (4.339)
giving
P =
1
2
V
0
I
0
cos θ, (4.340)
since ¸cos ωt sinωt) = 0 and ¸cos ωt cos ωt) = 1/2. In complex representation,
the voltage and the current are written
V (t) = V
0
exp(i ωt),
I(t) = I
0
exp[i (ωt −θ)], (4.341)
218
where I
0
and V
0
are assumed to be real quantities. Note that
1
2
(V I
∗
+V
∗
I) = V
0
I
0
cos θ. (4.342)
It follows that
P =
1
4
(V I
∗
+V
∗
I) =
1
2
Re(V I
∗
). (4.343)
Making use of Eq. (4.336), we ﬁnd that
P =
1
2
Re(Z) [I[
2
=
1
2
Re(Z) [V [
2
[Z[
2
. (4.344)
Note that power dissipation is associated with the real part of the impedance.
For the special case of an LCR circuit,
P =
1
2
RI
2
0
. (4.345)
It is clear that only the resistor dissipates energy in this circuit. The inductor
and the capacitor both store energy, but they eventually return it to the circuit
without dissipation.
According to Eq. (4.336), the amplitude of the current which ﬂows in an LCR
circuit for a given amplitude of the input voltage is given by
I
0
=
V
0
[Z[
=
V
0
_
(ωL −1/ωC)
2
+R
2
. (4.346)
The response of the circuit is clearly resonant, peaking at ω = 1/
√
LC, and
reaching 1/
√
2 of the peak value at ω = 1/
√
LC ± R/2L (assuming that R ¸
_
L/C). In fact, LCR circuits are used in radio tuners to ﬁlter out signals whose
frequencies fall outside a given band.
The phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage is given by
θ = arg(Z) = tan
−1
_
ωL −1/ωC
R
_
. (4.347)
219
The phase lag varies from −π/2 for frequencies signiﬁcantly below the resonant
frequency, to zero at the resonant frequency (ω = 1/
√
LC), to π/2 for frequencies
signiﬁcantly above the resonant frequency.
It is clear that in conventional AC circuits the circuit equation reduces to a
simple algebraic equation, and the behaviour of the circuit is summed up by the
impedance Z. The real part of Z tells us the power dissipated in the circuit, the
magnitude of Z gives the ratio of the peak current to the peak voltage, and the
argument of Z gives the phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage.
4.17 Transmission lines
The central assumption made in the analysis of conventional AC circuits is that
the voltage (and, hence, the current) has the same phase throughout the circuit.
Unfortunately, if the circuit is suﬃciently large and the frequency of oscillation
ω is suﬃciently high then this assumption becomes invalid. The assumption of
a constant phase throughout the circuit is reasonable if the wavelength of the
oscillation λ = 2π c/ω is much larger than the dimensions of the circuit. This is
generally not the case in electrical circuits which are associated with communi
cation. The frequencies in such circuits tend to be high and the dimensions are,
almost by deﬁnition, large. For instance, leased telephone lines (the type you at
tach computers to) run at 56 kHz. The corresponding wavelength is about 5 km,
so the constant phase approximation clearly breaks down for long distance calls.
Computer networks generally run at about 10 MHz, corresponding to λ ∼ 30 m.
Thus, the constant phase approximation also breaks down for the computer net
work in this building, which is certainly longer than 30 m. It turns out that you
need a special sort of wire, called a transmission line, to propagate signals around
circuits whose dimensions greatly exceed the wavelength λ. Let us investigate
transmission lines.
An idealized transmission line consists of two parallel conductors of uniform
crosssectional area. The conductors possess a capacitance per unit length C, and
an inductance per unit length L. Suppose that x measures the position along the
line.
220
Consider the voltage diﬀerence between two neighbouring points on the line,
located at positions x and x+δx, respectively. The selfinductance of the portion
of the line lying between these two points is Lδx. This small section of the line
can be thought of as a conventional inductor, and therefore obeys the wellknown
equation
V (x, t) −V (x +δx, t) = Lδx
∂I(x, t)
∂t
, (4.348)
where V (x, t) is the voltage diﬀerence between the two conductors at position x
and time t, and I(x, t) is the current ﬂowing in one of the conductors at position
x and time t [the current ﬂowing in the other conductor is −I(x, t) ]. In the limit
δx →0, the above equation reduces to
∂V
∂x
= −L
∂I
∂t
. (4.349)
Consider the diﬀerence in current between two neighbouring points on the
line, located at positions x and x + δx, respectively. The capacitance of the
portion of the line lying between these two points is C δx. This small section of
the line can be thought of as a conventional capacitor, and therefore obeys the
wellknown equation
_
t
0
I(x, t) dt −
_
t
0
I(x +δx, t) = C δxV (x, t), (4.350)
where t = 0 denotes a time at which the charge stored in either of the conductors
in the region x to x +δx is zero. In the limit δx →0, the above equation yields
∂I
∂x
= −C
∂V
∂t
. (4.351)
Equations (4.349) and (4.351) are generally known as the “telegrapher’s equa
tions,” since an old fashioned telegraph line can be thought of as a primitive
transmission line (telegraph lines consist of a single wire; the other conductor is
the Earth.)
Diﬀerentiating Eq. (4.349) with respect to x, we obtain
∂
2
V
∂x
2
= −L
∂
2
I
∂x∂t
. (4.352)
221
Diﬀerentiating Eq. (4.351) with respect to t yields
∂
2
I
∂x∂t
= −C
∂
2
V
∂t
2
. (4.353)
The above two equations can be combined to give
LC
∂
2
V
∂t
2
=
∂
2
V
∂x
2
. (4.354)
This is clearly a wave equation with wave velocity v = 1/
√
LC. An analogous
equation can be written for the current I.
Consider a transmission line which is connected to a generator at one end
(x = 0) and a resistor R at the other (x = l). Suppose that the generator outputs
a voltage V
0
cos ωt. If follows that
V (0, t) = V
0
cos ωt. (4.355)
The solution to the wave equation (4.354), subject to the above boundary condi
tion, is
V (x, t) = V
0
cos(ωt −kx), (4.356)
where k = ω
√
LC. This clearly corresponds to a wave which propagates from the
generator towards the resistor. Equations (4.349) and (4.356) yield
I(x, t) =
V
0
_
L/C
cos(ωt −kx). (4.357)
For selfconsistency, the resistor at the end of the line must have a particular
value;
R =
V (l, t)
I(l, t)
=
_
L
C
. (4.358)
The socalled “input impedance” of the line is deﬁned
Z
in
=
V (0, t)
I(0, t)
=
_
L
C
. (4.359)
222
Thus, a transmission line terminated by a resistor R =
_
L/R acts very much
like a conventional resistor R = Z
in
in the circuit containing the generator. In
fact, the transmission line could be replaced by an eﬀective resistor R = Z
in
in
the circuit diagram for the generator circuit. The power loss due to this eﬀective
resistor corresponds to power which is extracted from the circuit, transmitted
down the line, and absorbed by the terminating resistor.
The most commonly occurring type of transmission line is a coaxial cable,
which consists of two coaxial cylindrical conductors of radii a and b (with b > a).
We have already shown that the capacitance per unit length of such a cable is
(see Section 4.5)
C =
2π
0
ln(b/a)
. (4.360)
Let us now calculate the inductance per unit length. Suppose that the inner
conductor carries a current I. According to Amp`ere’s law, the magnetic ﬁeld in
the region between the conductors is given by
B
θ
=
µ
0
I
2πr
. (4.361)
The ﬂux linking unit length of the cable is
Φ =
_
b
a
B
θ
dr =
µ
0
I
2π
ln(b/a). (4.362)
Thus, the selfinductance per unit length is
L =
Φ
I
=
µ
0
2π
ln(b/a). (4.363)
The speed of propagation of a wave down a coaxial cable is
v =
1
√
LC
=
1
√
0
µ
0
= c. (4.364)
Not surprisingly, the wave (which is a type of electromagnetic wave) propagates
at the speed of light. The impedance of the cable is given by
Z
0
=
_
L
C
=
_
µ
0
4π
2
0
_
1/2
ln(b/a) = 60 ln(b/a) ohms. (4.365)
223
We have seen that if a transmission line is terminated by a resistor whose
resistance R matches the impedance Z
0
of the line then all the power sent down
the line is absorbed by the resistor. What happens if R ,= Z
0
? The answer is that
some of the power is reﬂected back down the line. Suppose that the beginning
of the line lies at x = −l and the end of the line is at x = 0. Let us consider a
solution
V (x, t) = V
0
exp[i (ωt −kx)] +KV
0
exp[i (ωt +kx)]. (4.366)
This corresponds to a voltage wave of amplitude V
0
which travels down the line
and is reﬂected, with reﬂection coeﬃcient K, at the end of the line. It is easily
demonstrated from the telegrapher’s equations that the corresponding current
waveform is
I(x, t) =
V
0
Z
0
exp[i (ωt −kx)] −
KV
0
Z
0
exp[i (ωt +kx)]. (4.367)
Since the line is terminated by a resistance R at x = 0 we have, from Ohm’s law,
V (0, t)
I(0, t)
= R. (4.368)
This yields an expression for the coeﬃcient of reﬂection,
K =
R −Z
0
R +Z
0
. (4.369)
The input impedance of the line is given by
Z
in
=
V (−l, t)
I(−l, t)
= Z
0
Rcos kl + i Z
0
sinkl
Z
0
cos kl + i Rsinkl
. (4.370)
Clearly, if the resistor at the end of the line is properly matched, so that
R = Z
0
, then there is no reﬂection (i.e., K = 0), and the input impedance of
the line is Z
0
. If the line is short circuited, so that R = 0, then there is total
reﬂection at the end of the line (i.e., K = −1), and the input impedance becomes
Z
in
= i Z
0
tankl. (4.371)
This impedance is purely imaginary, implying that the transmission line absorbs
no net power from the generator circuit. In fact, the line acts rather like a pure
224
inductor or capacitor in the generator circuit (i.e., it can store, but cannot absorb,
energy). If the line is open circuited, so that R → ∞, then there is again total
reﬂection at the end of the line (i.e., K = 1), and the input impedance becomes
Z
in
= i Z
0
tan(kl −π/2). (4.372)
Thus, the open circuited line acts like a closed circuited line which is shorter by
one quarter of a wavelength. For the special case where the length of the line is
exactly one quarter of a wavelength (i.e., kl = π/2), we ﬁnd
Z
in
=
Z
2
0
R
. (4.373)
Thus, a quarter wave line looks like a pure resistor in the generator circuit.
Finally, if the length of the line is much less than the wavelength (i.e., kl ¸ 1)
then we enter the constant phase regime, and Z
in
· R (i.e., we can forget about
the transmission line connecting the terminating resistor to the generator circuit).
Suppose that we want to build a radio transmitter. We can use a half wave
antenna to emit the radiation. We know that in electrical circuits such an antenna
acts like a resistor of resistance 73 ohms (it is more usual to say that the antenna
has an impedance of 73 ohms). Suppose that we buy a 500 kW generator to supply
the power to the antenna. How do we transmit the power from the generator to
the antenna? We use a transmission line, of course. (It is clear that if the distance
between the generator and the antenna is of order the dimensions of the antenna
(i.e., λ/2) then the constant phase approximation breaks down, so we have to
use a transmission line.) Since the impedance of the antenna is ﬁxed at 73 ohms
we need to use a 73 ohm transmission line (i.e., Z
0
= 73 ohms) to connect the
generator to the antenna, otherwise some of the power we send down the line
is reﬂected (i.e., not all of the power output of the generator is converted into
radio waves). If we wish to use a coaxial cable to connect the generator to the
antenna, then it is clear from Eq. (4.365) that the radii of the inner and outer
conductors need to be such that b/a = 3.38.
Suppose, ﬁnally, that we upgrade our transmitter to use a full wave antenna
(i.e., an antenna whose length equals the wavelength of the emitted radiation).
A full wave antenna has a diﬀerent impedance than a half wave antenna. Does
this mean that we have to rip out our original coaxial cable and replace it by
225
one whose impedance matches that of the new antenna? Not necessarily. Let Z
0
be the impedance of the coaxial cable, and Z
1
the impedance of the antenna.
Suppose that we place a quarter wave transmission line (i.e., one whose length is
one quarter of a wavelength) of characteristic impedance Z
1/4
=
√
Z
0
Z
1
between
the end of the cable and the antenna. According to Eq. (4.373) (with Z
0
→
√
Z
0
Z
1
and R → Z
1
) the input impedance of the quarter wave line is Z
in
= Z
0
,
which matches that of the cable. The output impedance matches that of the
antenna. Consequently, there is no reﬂection of the power sent down the cable
to the antenna. A quarter wave line of the appropriate impedance can easily be
fabricated from a short length of coaxial cable of the appropriate b/a.
4.18 Epilogue
Unfortunately, our investigation of the many and varied applications of Maxwell’s
equations must now come to and end, since we have run out of time. Many im
portant topics have been skipped in this course. For instance, we have hardly
mentioned the interaction of electric and magnetic ﬁelds with matter. It turns out
that atoms polarize in the presence of electric ﬁelds. Under many circumstances
this has the eﬀect of increasing the eﬀective permittivity of space; i.e.,
0
→
0
,
where > 1 is called the relative permittivity or dielectric constant of matter.
Magnetic materials (e.g., iron) develop net magnetic moments in the presence
of magnetic ﬁelds. This has the eﬀect of increasing the eﬀective permeability of
space; i.e., µ
0
→ µµ
0
, where µ > 1 is called the relative permeability of mat
ter. More interestingly, matter can reﬂect, transmit, absorb, or eﬀectively slow
down, electromagnetic radiation. For instance, long wavelength radio waves are
reﬂected by charged particles in the ionosphere. Short wavelength waves are not
reﬂected and, therefore, escape to outer space. This explains why it is possible
to receive long wavelength radio transmissions when the transmitter is over the
horizon. This is not possible at shorter wavelengths. For instance, to receive
FM or TV signals the transmitter must be in the line of sight (this explains
the extremely local coverage of such transmitters). Another fascinating topic
is the generation of extremely short wavelength radiation, such as microwaves
and radar. This is usually done by exciting electromagnetic standing waves in
conducting cavities, rather than by using antennas. Finally, we have not men
226
tioned relativity. It turns out, somewhat surprisingly, that Maxwell’s equations
are invariant under the Lorentz transformation. This is essentially because mag
netism is an intrinsically relativistic phenomenon. In relativistic notation the
whole theory of electromagnetism can be summed up in just two equations.
227
1.2
Outline of course
The main topic of this course is Maxwell’s equations. These are a set of eight ﬁrst order partial diﬀerential equations which constitute a complete description of electric and magnetic phenomena. To be more exact, Maxwell’s equations constitute a complete description of the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds. You are all, no doubt, quite familiar with the concepts of electric and magnetic ﬁelds, but I wonder how many of you can answer the following question. “Do electric and magnetic ﬁelds have a real physical existence or are they just theoretical constructs which we use to calculate the electric and magnetic forces exerted by charged particles on one another?” In trying to formulate an answer to this question we shall, hopefully, come to a better understanding of the nature of electric and magnetic ﬁelds and the reasons why it is necessary to use these concepts in order to fully describe electric and magnetic phenomena. At any given point in space an electric or magnetic ﬁeld possesses two properties, a magnitude and a direction. In general, these properties vary from point to point. It is conventional to represent such a ﬁeld in terms of its components measured with respect to some conveniently chosen set of Cartesian axes (i.e., x, y, and z axes). Of course, the orientation of these axes is arbitrary. In other words, diﬀerent observers may well choose diﬀerent coordinate axes to describe the same ﬁeld. Consequently, electric and magnetic ﬁelds may have diﬀerent components according to diﬀerent observers. We can see that any description of electric and magnetic ﬁelds is going to depend on two diﬀerent things. Firstly, the nature of the ﬁelds themselves and, secondly, our arbitrary choice of the coordinate axes with respect to which we measure these ﬁelds. Likewise, Maxwell’s equations, the equations which describe the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds, depend on two diﬀerent things. Firstly, the fundamental laws of physics which govern the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds and, secondly, our arbitrary choice of coordinate axes. It would be nice if we could easily distinguish those elements of Maxwell’s equations which depend on physics from those which only depend on coordinates. In fact, we can achieve this using what mathematicians call vector ﬁeld theory. This enables us to write Maxwell’s equations in a manner which is completely independent of our choice of coordinate axes. As an added bonus, Maxwell’s equations look a lot simpler when written in a coordinate free manner.
2
In fact, instead of eight ﬁrst order partial diﬀerential equations, we only require four such equations using vector ﬁeld theory. It should be clear, by now, that we are going to be using a lot of vector ﬁeld theory in this course. In order to help you with this, I have decided to devote the ﬁrst few lectures of this course to a review of the basic results of vector ﬁeld theory. I know that most of you have already taken a course on this topic. However, that course was taught by somebody from the mathematics department. Mathematicians have their own agenda when it comes to discussing vectors. They like to think of vector operations as a sort of algebra which takes place in an abstract “vector space.” This is all very well, but it is not always particularly useful. So, when I come to review this topic I shall emphasize those aspects of vectors which make them of particular interest to physicists; namely, the fact that we can use them to write the laws of physics in a coordinate free fashion. Traditionally, an upper division college level course on electromagnetic theory is organized as follows. First, there is a lengthy discussion of electrostatics (i.e., electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charge distributions) and all of its applications. Next, there is a discussion of magnetostatics (i.e., magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady current distributions) and all of its applications. At this point, there is usually some mention of the interaction of steady electric and magnetic ﬁelds with matter. Next, there is an investigation of induction (i.e., electric and magnetic ﬁelds generated by time varying magnetic and electric ﬁelds, respectively) and its many applications. Only at this rather late stage in the course is it possible to write down the full set of Maxwell’s equations. The course ends with a discussion of electromagnetic waves. The organization of my course is somewhat diﬀerent to that described above. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, I do not think that the traditional course emphasizes Maxwell’s equations suﬃciently. After all, they are only written down in their full glory more than three quarters of the way through the course. I ﬁnd this a problem because, as I have already mentioned, I think that Maxwell’s equations should be the principal topic of an upper division course on electromagnetic theory. Secondly, in the traditional course it is very easy for the lecturer to fall into the trap of dwelling too long on the relatively uninteresting subject matter at the beginning of the course (i.e., electrostatics and magnetostatics) at the expense of the really interesting material towards the end of the course (i.e., induction,
3
Maxwell’s equations, and electromagnetic waves). I vividly remember that this is exactly what happened when I took this course as an undergraduate. I was very disappointed! I had been looking forward to hearing all about Maxwell’s equations and electromagnetic waves, and we were only able to cover these topics in a hurried and rather cursory fashion because the lecturer ran out of time at the end of the course. My course is organized as follows. The ﬁrst section is devoted to Maxwell’s equations. I shall describe how Maxwell’s equations can be derived from the familiar laws of physics which govern electric and magnetic phenomena, such as Coulomb’s law and Faraday’s law. Next, I shall show that Maxwell’s equations possess propagating wave like solutions, called electromagnetic waves, and, furthermore, that light, radio waves, and Xrays, are all diﬀerent types of electromagnetic wave. Finally, I shall demonstrate that it is possible to write down a formal solution to Maxwell’s equations, given a sensible choice of boundary conditions. The second section of my course is devoted to the applications of Maxwell’s equations. We shall investigate electrostatic ﬁelds generated by stationary charge distributions, conductors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, the energy and momentum carried by electromagnetic ﬁelds, and the generation and transmission of electromagnetic radiation. This arrangement of material gives the proper emphasis to Maxwell’s equations. It also reaches the right balance between the interesting and the more mundane aspects of electromagnetic theory. Finally, it ensures that even if I do run out of time towards the end of the course I shall still have covered Maxwell’s equations and electromagnetic waves in adequate detail. One topic which I am not going to mention at all in my course is the interaction of electromagnetic ﬁelds with matter. It is impossible to do justice to this topic at the college level, which is why I always prefer to leave it to graduate school.
4
It is clear from the diagram that vector addition is 5 .g. a) in typeset documents and by underlined characters (e. denoted vectors. In fact. like in scalar addition. P Q. a) in longhand.g. By convention. whereas scalars possess a magnitude but no direction. Vector addition can be → → → → → represented using a parallelogram: P R = P Q + QR. denoted scalars. Some quantities. and c ≡ P R.g. R Q S P → → → b ≡ QR ≡ P S. Suppose that a ≡ P Q ≡ SR. vectors just possess a magnitude and a direction. vector quantities are denoted by boldfaced characters (e. are represented by real numbers.2 2. → Others. Note Q P that line elements (and therefore vectors) are movable and do not carry intrinsic position information. are represented by directed line elements: e.1 Vector assault course Vector algebra In applied mathematics physical quantities are represented by two distinct classes of objects. Vectors can be added together but the same units must be used.
and z axes. Unit vectors can be deﬁned in the x. y.commutative: e. Any vector can be written in terms of these unit vectors a = ax i + ay j + az k. n(a + b) = na + nb. It can also be shown that the associative law holds: e. (2. any set of three noncoplanar vectors can be used as basis vectors. (2. j ≡ (0. ay .g. 0). In physics we adopt the second approach because we can generalize it to ndimensional spaces without suﬀering brain failure. where threedimensional space and onedimensional time combine to form fourdimensional spacetime. The coordinate approach assumes that space is deﬁned by Cartesian coordinates and uses these to characterize vectors. az + bz ).. naz ). by . (2. In the coordinate approach a vector is denoted as the row matrix of its components along each of the Cartesian axes (the x. and z directions as i ≡ (1. say): a ≡ (ax .g. bz ) then vector addition is deﬁned a + b ≡ (ax + bx . In fact. There are two approaches to vector analysis. az ) and b ≡ (bx . nay . a + b = b + a. ay . The geometric approach is based on line elements in space. as is necessary in general relativity. 6 .2) If a is a vector and n is a scalar then the product of a scalar and a vector is deﬁned na ≡ (nax .” If a ≡ (ax .3) It is clear that vector algebra is distributive with respect to scalar multiplication: e. y. ax is the xcoordinate of the “head” of the vector minus the xcoordinate of its “tail. This is necessary in special relativity.4) In mathematical terminology three vectors used in this manner form a basis of the vector space. (2.. The coordinate approach can also be generalized to curved spaces. 1. az ). If the three vectors are mutually perpendicular then they are termed orthogonal basis vectors. 0.. 1).g.1) Here. ay + by . 0. 0). a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c. and k ≡ (0.
y. and z axes.e. (2. y. they must depend in a very speciﬁc manner [i.. = −x sin θ + y cos θ. δt→0 dt δt (2. and z axes via rotation through an angle θ around the zaxis. In the new basis the coordinates of the general displacement r from the y / y x/ θ x origin are (x . = z. z ).Examples of vectors in physics are displacements from an origin r = (x. which are related to the x.6) Suppose that we transform to new orthogonal basis. y . These coordinates are related to the previous coordinates via x y z = x cos θ + y sin θ. Since any vector can be represented as a displacement from an origin (this is just a special case of a directed line element) it follows that the components of a 7 .7) We do not need to change our notation for the displacement in the new basis. y .7) ] which preserves the magnitude and direction of r. The reason for this is that the magnitude and direction of r are independent of the choice of basis vectors. The coordinates of r do depend on the choice of basis vectors. It is still denoted r. the x . (2.5) (2. Eq. However. z) and velocities v= r(t + δt) − r(t) dr = lim .
(2. however. (2. (ax .general vector a must transform in an analogous manner to Eq. (2. Displacement vectors and all vectors derived from displacements automatically satisfy Eq. other physical quantities which have both magnitude and direction but which are not obviously related to displacements.and zaxes.8) with similar transformation rules for rotation about the y.8). This quantity S clearly possesses both magnitude and direction.8). az ) are the components of a vector provided that they transform under rotation like Eq. (2. the individual components of a vector (a x . (2. az ) cannot be the components of a vector if they do not transform like Eq. = −ax sin θ + ay cos θ.8). Conversely. But is it a true vector? We know that if the normal to the surface makes an angle αx with the xaxis then the area 8 . Thus. ax ay az = ax cos θ + ay sin θ. ay . ay . 2. In the coordinate approach Eq. Thus. There are. in the sense determined by the righthand grip rule on the rim. say) are real numbers but they are not scalars. We need to check carefully to see whether these quantities are vectors.7). We can deﬁne a vector area S whose magnitude is S and whose direction is perpendicular to the plane. = az . Scalar quantities are invariant under transformation.8) is the deﬁnition of a vector.2 Vector areas Suppose that we have planar surface of scalar area S. The three quantities (ax . (2.
So. It follows that S = S(cos α. then Sx = S cos(α − θ) = S cos α cos θ + S sin α sin θ = Sx cos θ + Sy sin θ. As a corollary.9) which is the correct transformation rule for the xcomponent of a vector. a closed surface has S = 0 since it does not possess a rim. for many joined up plane areas the projected area in the xdirection.10) If we approach a limit. two diﬀerent surfaces sharing the same rim both possess the same vector areas. by letting the number of plane facets increase and their area reduce. In conclusion.11) i It is clear that the projected area of the rim in the xdirection is just S x . 0). Similarly. If we rotate the basis about the zaxis by θ degrees. If we limit ourselves to a surface whose normal is perpendicular to the zdirection then αx = π/2 − αy = α. if the normal makes an angle αy with the yaxis then the area seen in the ydirection is S cos αy . According to the vector addition theorem the projected area of two plane surfaces. then we obtain a continuous surface denoted by the resultant vector area: S= δSi . is the xcomponent of the resultant of all the vector areas: S= i Si . Likewise. sin α. (2. This proves that a vector area is a true vector. a loop (not all in one plane) has a vector area S which is the resultant of the vector areas of any surface ending on the loop. The components of S are the projected areas of the loop in the directions of the basis vectors.seen in the xdirection is S cos αx . which is the same as the projected area of the rim in the xdirection. in the x direction (say) is the xcomponent of the sum of the vector areas. 9 . (2. joined together at a line. Note that the rim of the surface determines the vector area rather than the nature of the surface. (2. which is equivalent to rotating the normal to the surface about the zaxis by −θ degrees. This is the ycomponent of S. The other components transform correctly as well. This is the xcomponent of S.
1/ 2. as must be the case if it is a scalar number? Let us consider an example. −1/ 2.3 The scalar product A scalar quantity is invariant under all possible rotational transformations. 0). giving a&b = 1/2. 10 (2.14) . Suppose that a = (1.8). Clearly.13) Let us rotate the basis though θ degrees about the zaxis. vectors? Suppose that we were to deﬁne the “ampersand” product a&b = ax by + ay bz + az bx = scalar number (2. Incidentally. According to Eq. 0) and b = (0. Clearly. 0). a = (1/ 2. or more. Is a&b invariant under transformation. 0) 45 √ and b = (1/ 2. Let √ now √ us rotate ◦ the basis through √ about the zaxis. 1. It is easily seen that a&b = 1. 0.15) The associative property is meaningless for the dot product because we cannot have (a · b) · c since a · b is scalar. in the new basis a · b takes the form a · b = (ax cos θ + ay sin θ)(bx cos θ + by sin θ) +(−ax sin θ + ay cos θ)(−bx sin θ + by cos θ) + az bz = a x bx + a y by + a z bz . The individual components of a vector are not scalars because they change under transformation. a · b is a true scalar.12) for general vectors a and b. a · b is the only simple combination of the components of two vectors which transforms like a scalar. so the above deﬁnition is a good one. (2. a&b is not invariant under rotational transformation. It is easily shown that the dot product is commutative and distributive: a · b = b · a. the dot product or scalar product: a · b = ax bx + ay by + az bz = scalar number. Consider. so the above deﬁnition is a bad one. Thus. It can easily be shown that it is also invariant under rotation about the x. In the new basis. (2.2. a · (b + c) = a · b + a · c. now. (2. a · b is invariant under rotation about the zaxis. Can we form a scalar out of some combination of the components of one.and yaxes.
the invariance of a · a is equivalent to the invariance of the length. However. (2. The length of vector a is usually denoted a (“the modulus of a”) or sometimes just a. Note that if a · b = 0 then either 11 . so a · a = a2 = a2 .20) (2. or magnitude. (2. of vector a under transformation.18) Clearly.17) B b ba θ O a A Let us now investigate the general case. if a is the position vector of P relative to the origin O. So.We have shown that the dot product a · b is coordinate independent. (2. The length squared of AB is (b − a) · (b − a) = a2 + b2 − 2 a · b.16) a · b = ax2 + ay2 + az2 = Length (OP )2 . according to the “cosine rule” of trigonometry (AB)2 = (OA)2 + (OB)2 − 2(OA)(OB) cos θ. But what is the physical signiﬁcance of this? Consider the special case where a = b. It follows that a · b = ab cos θ.19) (2. Clearly. the invariance of a·b under transformation is equivalent to the invariance of the angle subtended between the two vectors. where (AB) denotes the length of side AB.
(2. 0). However. Consider. −1/ 2.24) Is axb a proper vector? Suppose that a = (1. the cross product or vector product: a ∧ b = (ay bz − az by .25) . ay by . 0). above deﬁnition is a bad one. if we rotate the √ basis through 45◦ about the zaxis then √ √ √ a = (1/ 2. b = (1/ 2. 0). If the angle subtended between F and r is θ then W = F (r cos θ) = F · r. (2. −1/2. 1. b = 0. Rate of ﬂow = v · S. 0). 0). (2. axb = 0. Can we also construct a vector which is not just a linear combination of a and b? Consider the following deﬁnition: axb = (ax bx .4 The vector product We have discovered how to construct a scalar from the components of two general vectors a and b. axb does not transform like a vector because its magnitude depends on the choice of axis. or the vectors a and b are perpendicular. b = (0.22) The rate of ﬂow of liquid of constant velocity v through a loop of vector area S is the product of the magnitude of the area times the component of the velocity perpendicular to the loop. ax by − ay bx ) = c. 12 (2.23) 2.21) The work W performed by a force F moving through a displacement r is the product of the magnitude of F times the displacement in the direction of F . So. 0. az bz ). Thus. az bx − ax bz . ab (2. The angle subtended between two vectors can easily be obtained from the dot product: cos θ = a·b . and axb = (1/2. Thus.a = 0. 1/ 2. Clearly. now.
29) (2.31) . and a ∧ b form a righthanded set like the unit vectors i.8).30) Therefore. which means that it must have a well deﬁned direction and magnitude. j. it can be demonstrated that a ∧ b is perpendicular to b. If this is zero then the cross product must be perpendicular to a.Does this rather unlikely combination transform like a vector? Let us try rotating the basis through θ degrees about the zaxis using Eq. (2. a ∧ b is a proper vector. The cross product is anticommutative: a ∧ b = −b ∧ a. a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a ∧ b) ∧ c. b. (2. The vectors a. the xcomponent of a ∧ b transforms correctly. which is obtained from the righthand rule. It can easily be shown that the other components transform correctly as well. Now a · a ∧ b = ax (ay bz − az by ) + ay (az bx − ax bz ) + az (ax by − ay bx ) = 0. This deﬁnes a unique direction for a ∧ b. In the new basis cx = (−ax sin θ + ay cos θ)bz − az (−bx sin θ + by cos θ) = (ay bz − az by ) cos θ + (az bx − ax bz ) sin θ = cx cos θ + cy sin θ. We have (a ∧ b)2 = (ay bz − az by )2 + (az bx − ax bz )2 + (ax bz − ay bx )2 = a2 b2 − (a · b)2 = (ax2 + ay2 + az2 )(bx2 + by2 + bz2 ) − (ax bx + ay by + az bz )2 = a2 b2 − a2 b2 cos2 θ = a2 b2 sin2 θ. Likewise.27) The cross product transforms like a vector.28) (2. and k: i ∧ j = k.26) Thus. 13 (2. (2. Thus. Consider a · a ∧ b. distributive: but is not associative: a ∧ (b + c) = a ∧ b + a ∧ c. a ∧ b is perpendicular to a. Let us now evaluate the magnitude of a ∧ b. We can show that a ∧ b is perpendicular to both a and b. (2.
middle finger index finger a ∧ b = ab sin θ. The scalar area is ab sin θ.thumb a^ b b θ a Thus. or b is parallel (or antiparallel) to a. The vector area has the magnitude of the scalar area and is normal to the plane of the parallelogram. b = 0. the magnitude of the moment is F r sin θ. (2. (2. The direction of a moment is conventionally the direction of the axis through O about which the force tries 14 . Suppose that a force F is applied at position r. which means that it is perpendicular to both a and b. The moment about the origin O is the product of the magnitude of the force and the length of the lever arm OQ. Consider the parallelogram deﬁned by vectors a and b.32) Clearly. Also.33) with the sense obtained from the righthand grip rule by rotating a on to b. a ∧ a = 0 for any vector. if a ∧ b = 0 then either a = 0. Thus. since θ is always zero in this case. the vector area is given by b θ a S = a ∧ b. Clearly.
Clearly. But.5 Rotation Let us try to deﬁne a rotation vector θ whose magnitude is the angle of the rotation. θ. in the sense determined by the righthand grip rule. the zrotation plus the xrotation does not equal the xrotation plus the zrotation. in the sense determined by the righthand grip rule. This noncommuting algebra cannot be represented by vectors. It follows that the vector moment is given by M = r ∧ F. So. and the other about the zaxis. Suppose that we take a general 15 . no. to a sixsided die. It can be seen that the die ends up in two completely diﬀerent states. this is not quite the end of the story. (2. In the lefthand case the zrotation is applied before the xrotation.34) 2. The diagram shows the eﬀect of applying two successive 90 ◦ rotations. and whose direction is the axis of the rotation. although rotations have a well deﬁned magnitude and direction they are not vector quantities. whereas vector addition is. and vice versa in the righthand case. The problem is that the addition of rotations is not commutative.F θ P r O r sinθ Q to rotate objects. Is this a good vector? The short answer is. one about xaxis.
According to Eq.z x y zaxis xaxis xaxis zaxis vector a and rotate it about the zaxis by a small angle δθ z . This is equivalent to rotating the basis about the zaxis by −δθz . (2. We ﬁnd that a a + δθ ∧ a.8) we have a a + δθz k ∧ a. 16 (2.and yaxes by δθx and δθy . The above equation can easily be generalized to allow small rotations about the x.35) where use has been made of the small angle expansions sin θ θ and cos θ 1. (2. respectively.36) .
but it only works for small angle rotations (i. (2. b. It follows that a · b ∧ c is the volume of the parallelepiped deﬁned by vectors a.e. 17 (2. So.40) . The fact that inﬁnitesimal rotation is a vector implies that angular velocity.where δθ = δθx i + δθy j + δθz k. The scalar triple product is deﬁned a · b ∧ c.39) dt 2. ω = lim δθ .38) must be a vector as well. we can deﬁne a rotation vector δθ. δt→0 δt (2. Now. b. except that a · b ∧ c = −a · c ∧ b. b ∧ c is the vector area of the parallelogram deﬁned by b and c. This volume is independent of how the triple product is a c b formed from a. a · b ∧ c is the scalar area of this parallelogram times the component of a in the direction of its normal. and c. and c.. a small zrotation plus a small xrotation is (approximately) equal to the two rotations applied in the opposite order. and c.37) Clearly. b. If a is interpreted as a(t + δt) in the above equation then it is clear that the equation of motion of a vector precessing about the origin with angular velocity ω is da = ω ∧ a. suﬃciently small that the small angle expansions of sine and cosine are good). (2.6 The scalar triple product Consider three vectors a. According to the above equation.
44) Forming the dot product of this equation with b ∧ c then we obtain r · b ∧ c = αa · b ∧ c.47) 18 . (2.e. and c. and c form a righthanded set (i. (2. b. b. the “volume” is positive if a.. If a.e. or if a. but any anticyclic permutation causes it to change sign. then any vector r can be written in terms of them: r = αa + βb + γc. The brackets are important because a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a ∧ b) ∧ c. and c are noncoplanar.7 The vector triple product For three vectors a. (2. in the sense determined from the righthand grip rule by rotating b on to c) and negative if they form a lefthanded set. b. The triple product is unchanged if the dot and cross product operators are interchanged: a · b ∧ c = a ∧ b · c.45) r·b∧c .43) (2.So.. if a lies above the plane of b and c. (2.46) a·b∧c Analogous expressions can be written for β and γ. a · b ∧ c = −b · a ∧ c.42) The scalar triple product is zero if any two of a. a · b ∧ c = b · c ∧ a = c · a ∧ b. The parameters α. provided that the three basis vectors are not coplanar. and c are coplanar. b. 2. so α= (2. β. b. b. In fact. and c the vector triple product is deﬁned a ∧ (b ∧ c). and γ are uniquely determined provided a · b ∧ c = 0. and c are parallel. i.41) The triple product is also invariant under any cyclic permutation of a. it can be demonstrated that a ∧ (b ∧ c) ≡ (a · c)b − (a · b)c (2.
c = (cx . It follows that b = (bx . bx cy ). −ax bx cy .50) = lim δt→0 dt δt When written out in component form this becomes da = dt dax day daz . (2. 0) = LHS.and (a ∧ b) ∧ c ≡ (a · c)b − (b · c)a. and c lies in the xy plane. 0). This is the lefthand side of Eq. which proves the theorem. What now is the time derivative of a? We have dax d dφ dbx = (φbx ) = bx + φ .48) Let us try to prove the ﬁrst of the above theorems. so that a = a(t). (2. Suppose that a is. 0. It follows that a ∧ (b ∧ c) lies in the xy plane: a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (ax bx cy .51) ˙ Note that da/dt is often written in shorthand as a. ax bx cy . . the product of a scalar φ(t) and another vector b(t). 0. az ). in fact.49) 2. and a = (ax . dt dt dt dt 19 (2. so if we can prove this result in one particular coordinate system then it must be true in general. 0) − (ax bx cx . The vector b ∧ c is directed along the zaxis: b ∧ c = (0. −ax bx cy .47) in our convenient axes. (2.8 Vector calculus Suppose that vector a varies with time. dt dt dt .52) . 0. To evaluate the righthand side we need a · c = ax cx + ay cy and a · b = ax bx . 0). (2. Let us take convenient axes such that the xaxis lies along b. ay . It follows that the righthand side is RHS = ( (ax cx + ay cy )bx . cy . (2. 0). The time derivative of the vector is deﬁned a(t + δt) − a(t) da . 0) = (ay cy bx . The lefthand side and the righthand side are both proper vectors.
P (2.53) It is easily demonstrated that d ˙ ˙ (a · b) = a · b + a · b. y) dl = Area under the curve. y) which is deﬁned for all x and y. The integral is then simply given by Q f (x. d ˙ ˙ (a ∧ b) = a ∧ b + a ∧ b. 2.9 Line integrals Consider a twodimensional function f (x.which implies that da dφ db = b+φ . dt Likewise.56) 20 .54) (2. dt dt dt (2. What is meant by the integral of f along a given curve from P to Q in the xy y l Q f P x P l Q plane? We ﬁrst draw out f as a function of length l along the path. dt (2.55) It can be seen that the laws of vector diﬀerentiation are analogous to those in conventional calculus.
Thus.60) 21 .As an example of this. y) dx + g(x.1) 1 P = (0.0) √ 2 x x = y. 2 (2.57) The integration along route 2 gives Q 1 1 xy dl P = 0 xy dx y=0 1 + 0 xy dy x=1 = 0+ 0 y dy = 1 . The most common type of line integral is where the contributions from dx and dy are evaluated separately. Q 1 xy dl = P 0 √ x2 2 dx = √ 2 . Along route 1 we have y Q = (1. y) dy] .59) As an example of this consider the integral Q y 3 dx + x dy P (2. consider the integral of f (x. P (2.58) Note that the integral depends on the route taken between the initial and ﬁnal points. 3 (2. y) = xy between P and Q along the two routes indicated in the diagram below. so dl = 2 dx. Q [f (x. rather that through the path length dl.
y) = F (Q) − F (P ). then F (Q) = F (P ) + P (f dx + g dy) (2.y Q = (2. The line integral between points P and Q is simply the change in height in the contour map between these two points: Q Q (f dx + g dy) = P P dF (x. y). the integral depends on the path of integration.0) x along the two routes indicated in the diagram below. We can then draw a contour map of F (x.64) deﬁnes F (Q) for all other points in the plane.65) . Given F (P ) for one point P in the xy plane. (2. 4 (2.61) Along route 2 Q = P 1 y dx y=0 3 + 0 x dy x=2 = 2. It follows that Q P (f dx + g dy) = F (Q) − F (P ) Q (2. so Q 1 = P 0 2 y 3 dy + (y + 1) dy = 1 7 . Suppose that we have a line integral which does not depend on the path of integration. Along route 1 we have x = y + 1 and dx = dy.62) Again.63) for some function F . 22 (2.1) 1 2 P = (1.
Consider a general vector ﬁeld A(r). By analogy. y) dy. 0. central ﬁeld F = −r/r 3 . It is clear that there are two distinct types of line integral. y) = f (x.Thus. y) dx + g(x. dz) be the vector element of line length. 0) and Q = (a. As an example. 0). Route 1 is along the xaxis. if A is a force then the line integral is the work done in going from P to Q. if F = xy 3 then dF = y 3 dx + 3xy 2 dy and Q (2. and those which depend both on their endpoints and the integration path. the velocity v(r) in a moving liquid (e.66) y 3 dx + 3xy 2 dy = xy 3 P Q P (2. dy. a (2. Take P = (∞. For instance. we shall learn how to distinguish between these two types.68) For instance.g.69) . 0. so a W = ∞ 1 − 2 x 1 dx = x 23 a = ∞ 1 . a scalar ﬁeld is a set of scalars associated with each point in space. An example of a scalar ﬁeld is the temperature distribution T (r) in a furnace. Let dl = (dx.67) is independent of the path of integration. 2. inverse square law.10 Vector line integrals A vector ﬁeld is deﬁned as a set of vectors associated with each point in space. P (2. For instance. Those that depend only on their endpoints and not on the path of integration.. consider the work done in a repulsive. a whirlpool) constitutes a vector ﬁeld. dF (x. Later on. The element of work done is dW = F · dl. Vector line integrals often arise as Q P Q A · dl = (Ax dx + Ay dy + Az dz).
y) is V = D(x.11 Surface integrals Let us take a surface S.72) To evaluate this integral we must split the calculation into two ordinary integrals. In the ﬁrst part no work is done since F is perpendicular to dl. 0) and then parallel to the yaxis. ﬁrstly. (2. which is not necessarily coplanar. y) dS. For instance.70) In this case the integral is independent of path (which is just as well!). Then f (x. ∞. z) δSi i (2. y. and divide in up into (scalar) elements δSi . z) dS = lim S δSi →0 f (x. y y2 dy y1 x1 x2 x 24 . y. the volume of water in a lake of depth D(x.The second route is. In the second part 0 W = ∞ 1 −y dy = 2 + y 2 )3/2 2 + a2 )1/2 (a (y ∞ = 0 1 . a (2. around a large circle (r = constant) to the point (a. 2.71) is a surface integral.
0) x ﬁrst: dy 0 1−y x y dx 2 x3 = y dy 3 25 1−y = 0 y (1 − y)3 dy.1) 1y = x (1. the integral can be evaluated by taking the strips the other way around: x2 y2 (x) V = x1 dx y1 (x) D(x.76) where S is shown in the diagram below. The total volume is the sum over all strips: y2 x2 (y) V = y1 dy x1 (y) D(x.73) Note that the limits x1 and x2 depend on y. y) dy. S (2.The volume in the strip shown in the diagram is x2 D(x. y) dx dy. y) dx dy. 3 (2.74) Of course. y) dx ≡ D(x. Suppose that we evaluate the x integral y (0. But great care must be taken when evaluating the limits.77) .75) Interchanging the order of integration is a very powerful and useful trick. S (2. x1 (2. As an example. (2. consider x2 y dx dy.
82) S where θ is the angle subtended between the normal to the surface and the ﬂow velocity. 2. (2. when interchanging the order of integration the most important part of the whole problem is getting the limits of integration right.81) since the limits are both independent of the other variable. x2 y dx dy S (2. For instance.78) We can also evaluate the integral by interchanging the order of integration: 1 1−x 1 x dx 0 0 2 y dy = 0 1 x2 (1 − x)2 dx = . 3 2 6 (2. 2 60 (2. In general. The net rate of ﬂow of a surface S made up of lots of inﬁnitesimal surfaces is v · dS = lim dS→0 v cos θ dS . 26 . 60 (2.80) where S is a unit square. This integral can be written 1 1 1 1 dx 0 0 x y dy = 0 2 x dx 0 2 y dy = 1 1 1 = .12 Vector surface integrals Surface integrals often occur during vector analysis.79) In some cases a surface integral is just the product of two separate integrals.Let us now evaluate the y integral: 1 0 y4 y 2 3 −y +y − 3 3 dy = 1 . The only foolproof way of doing this is to draw a diagram. For instance. the rate of ﬂow of a liquid of velocity v through an inﬁnitesimal surface of vector area dS is v ·dS.
The volume element is sometimes written d3 r. (2. or even dτ . As an example of a volume integral. The height of the centre of gravity is given by z x y 27 .85) where V is some volume and dV = dx dy dz is a small volume element.13 Volume integrals A volume integral takes the form f (x. so what goes in must come out. (2. most surface integrals depend both on the surface and the rim. As an example of this. But some (very important) integrals depend only on the rim. let us evaluate the centre of gravity of a solid hemisphere of radius a. z) dV V (2. y.83) It follows that v · dS depends only on the rim.As with line integrals. and not on the nature of the surface which spans it. and not on the form of surfaces S 1 and S2 .84) 2. The volume between the surfaces is constant. consider incompressible ﬂuid ﬂow between two surfaces S1 and S2 which end on the same rim. and S1 v · dS = S2 v · dS.
a π/2 2π z dV = 0 a dr 0 dθ 0 π/2 dφ r cos θ r 2 sin θ 2π = 0 r dr 0 3 sin θ cos θ dθ 0 dφ = πa4 . 4 (2. = 4 2πa3 8 (2. Let dl = (dx. y) which is (say) the height of a hill. Consider a twodimensional scalar ﬁeld h(x.88) 2.86) The bottom integral is simply the volume of the hemisphere. for which z = r cos θ and dV = r 2 sin θ dr dθ dφ. Thus. dy) be an element of horizontal distance.87) giving z= πa4 3 3a . which is 2πa 3 /3.z= z dV dV. We wish to extend this idea to cover scalar f(x) x ﬁelds in two and three dimensions. Consider dh/dl. 28 .14 Gradient A onedimensional function f (x) has a gradient df /dx which is deﬁned as the slope of the tangent to the curve at x. The top integral is most easily evaluated in spherical polar coordinates. (2.
] The component of dh/dl in the xdirection can be obtained by plotting out the proﬁle of h at constant y.90) . This quantity is somewhat like the onedimensional gradient. For any other direction dh = dl dh dl cos θ.2. This quantity is known as the partial derivative of h with respect to x at constant y. The largest value of dh/dl is straight up the slope. In the immediate vicinity of some Contours of h(x. called the gradient of h.9). the gradient of the proﬁle at constant x is written (∂h/∂y)x . here. See. Note that the subscripts denoting constantx and constanty are usually omitted. as well as its magnitude. and is denoted (∂h/∂x)y . is analogous to that used for vector areas in Section 2. Likewise. in particular. ∂x ∂y 29 . max (2. (2. unless there is any ambiguity.y) y θ P x point P the slope reduces to an inclined plane. Eq. except that dh depends on the direction of dl. and then ﬁnding the slope of the tangent to the curve at given x. the component of grad h in any direction equals dh/dl for that direction.89) Let us deﬁne a twodimensional vector grad h. If follows that in component form ∂h ∂h grad h = . Because of the cos θ property.where dh is the change in height after moving an inﬁnitesimal distance dl. (2. whose magnitude is (dh/dl)max and whose direction is the direction of the steepest slope. [The argument.
y. This has the same local gradients as h(x. This vector is written in component form grad T = ∂T ∂T ∂T . according to the properties of the dot product. y) = h(x0 . z) in (say) a reaction vessel. now. the above equation demonstrates that grad h is a proper vector. ∂x ∂y ∂z . ∂h/∂y) and dl = (dx. ∂x ∂y ∂z 30 (2. Consider.92) (2.z is the gradient of the onedimensional temperature proﬁle at constant y and z. so dh = grad h · dl. ∂x β= ∂h ∂y (2.93) but grad h = (∂h/∂x. y0 ) + α(x − x0 ) + β(y − y0 ). (2. y). y0 ) is hT (x.96) . a threedimensional temperature distribution T (x.94) Incidentally. (2. dy. The change in T in going from point P to a neighbouring point oﬀset by dl = (dx. as a vector whose magnitude is (dT /dl)max and whose direction is the direction of the maximum gradient.Now. as before. dy). ∂T /∂x ≡ (∂T /∂x)y. Let us deﬁne grad T . . For small dx = x−x0 and dy = y −y0 the function h is coincident with the tangent plane. We have dh = ∂h ∂h dx + dy. since the lefthand side is a scalar and. ∂x ∂y (2. the equation of the tangent plane at P = (x0 .91) by diﬀerentiation of the above.95) Here. dz) is dT = ∂T ∂T ∂T dx + dy + dz. so α= ∂h . the righthand side is also a scalar provided that dl and grad h are both proper vectors (dl is an obvious vector because it is directly derived from displacements).
99) This integral is clearly independent of the path taken between P and Q.e. Suppose that dT = 0 for some dl. The proof of this is straightforward.In vector form this becomes dT = grad T · dl. Since dT = 0 along socalled “isotherms” (i. Keeping P ﬁxed we have Q P Q A · dl = V (Q). of course. (2. 31 (2.97) so dl is perpendicular to grad T . contours of the temperature) we conclude that the isotherms (contours) are everywhere perpendicular to grad T . P In general. T = constant dl gradT isotherm It is.. It follows that dT = grad T · dl = 0. (2. so Q grad T · dl must be path independent. It can be shown that if A is a conservative ﬁeld then A = grad φ for some scalar ﬁeld φ. but for some special vector ﬁelds the integral is path independent.100) .98) (2. Such ﬁelds are called conservative ﬁelds. possible to integrate dT . The line integral from point P to point Q is written Q Q dT = P P grad T · dl = T (Q) − T (P ). P A · dl depends on path.
The fact that zero net work is done in going around a closed loop is equivalent to the conservation of energy (this is why conservative ﬁelds are called “conservative”). ∂x ∂y ∂x . (2. so A · dl = 0. This operator acts on everything to its right in a expression until the end of the expression or a closing bracket is reached.104) where corresponds to the line integral around some closed loop. . . ∂x ∂y ∂z . the force due to gravity is a good example of a conservative ﬁeld. It follows that A = grad V. a frictional system loses energy in going around a closed cycle.102) ∂x with analogous relations for the other components of A. If A is conservative then A · dl = 0. grad f = f= ∂f ∂f ∂f .101) Hence. (2.105) which is usually called the “grad” or “del” operator. It is useful to deﬁne the vector operator ≡ ∂ ∂ ∂ . (2. ∂V = Ax . We have Q+dx V (Q + dx) = V (Q) + Q A · dl = V (Q) + Ax dx. (2. Consider moving the position of the end point by an inﬁnitesimal amount dx in the xdirection. then A · dl is the work done in traversing some path. For instance.106) 32 . (2. (2. If A is a force.103) In physics. A good example of a nonconservative ﬁeld is the force due to friction. Clearly.where V (Q) is a welldeﬁned function due to the path independent nature of the line integral.
111) (2. y.z y . where dS denotes an outward pointing surface element. This is another proof that f is a good vector. ∂z (2. ∂x ∂x ∂y x (2. Consider S A · dS over some closed surface S.8). = x sin θ + y cos θ. y .For two scalar ﬁelds φ and ψ.110) = x cos θ − y sin θ. This surface integral 33 . It can be seen that the diﬀerential operator transforms like a proper vector. z) are related to the new ones (x . grad(φψ) = φ grad ψ + ψ grad φ can be written more succinctly as (φψ) = φ ψ + ψ φ.7).15 Divergence Let us start with a vector ﬁeld A. = z.z y .108) (2.107) Suppose that we rotate the basis about the zaxis by θ degrees. according to Eq. (2. z ) via x y z Now.z ∂ ∂ ∂ = cos θ + sin θ . (2. (2.112) and = cos θ x + sin θ y. (2. the old coordinates (x. 2. ∂ = ∂x giving ∂x ∂x ∂ + ∂x ∂y ∂x ∂ + ∂y ∂z ∂x ∂ .109) y . By analogy with Eq.
115) The divergence of a vector ﬁeld is deﬁned div A = ·A= ∂Ax ∂Ay ∂Az + + . Consider a very small rectangular volume over which A hardly varies. (2. There are analogous contributions z+dz y+dy z z x y x+dx y x from the sides normal to the y and zaxes.113) since the vector area S of a closed surface is zero. The contribution to A · dS from the two faces normal to the xaxis is Ax (x + dx) dy dz − Ax (x) dy dz = ∂Ax ∂Ax dx dy dz = dV. S If A is constant in space then it is easily demonstrated that the net ﬂux out of S is zero: A · dS = A · dS = A · S = 0.114) where dV = dx dy dz is the volume element. (2. now.116) 34 . then A · dS is the rate of ﬂow of material out of S. so the total of all the contributions is A · dS = ∂Ay ∂Az ∂Ax + + ∂x ∂y ∂z dV. If A is the velocity of some ﬂuid.is usually called the ﬂux of A out of S. ∂x ∂x (2. that A is not uniform in space. Suppose. ∂x ∂y ∂z (2.
the integral of A · dS over the outer surface is equal to the integral of div A over the whole volume. leaving just the contribution from the outer surface. dV (2. We divide up the volume into lots of very small cubes and sum A · dS over all of the surfaces. Thus. it is coordinate independent). The formal deﬁnition of div A is div A = lim A · dS . for a vector ﬁeld with div A = 0. Now.115) for each cube individually. The proof is very straightfor S ward.. which proves the divergence theorem.119) S .e. We can use Eq.117) dV →0 This deﬁnition is independent of the shape of the inﬁnitesimal volume element. The contributions from the interior surfaces cancel out. This tells us that the summation is equivalent to div A dV over the whole volume. (2. V (2. A · dS = 0 35 (2.Divergence is a good scalar (i. One of the most important results in vector ﬁeld theory is the socalled divergence theorem or Gauss’ theorem. since it is the dot product of the vector operator with A. This states that for any volume V surrounded by a closed surface S. S A · dS = div A dV.118) where dS is an outward pointing volume element.
div v dV = 0 for any volume. if div A = 0 then the surface integral depends on the rim but not the nature of the surface which spans it. if div A = 0 then the integral depends on both the rim and the surface. the velocity components of an incompressible ﬂuid satisfy the following diﬀerential relation: ∂vx ∂vy ∂vz + + = 0. which is written −(∂/∂t)( V ρ dV ). S ρv · dS = − ∂ ∂t ρ dV V (2. (2. according to the divergence theorem. now. since what ﬂows into the surface must ﬂow out again.for any closed surface S. On the other hand.120) S1 S2 Thus. S1 S2 RIM Consider an incompressible ﬂuid whose velocity ﬁeld is v. This must be equal to the rate of decrease of mass inside the volume V enclosed by S. (2. Thus. a compressible ﬂuid of density ρ and velocity v.122) 36 . The only way in which this is possible is if div v is everywhere zero. for two surfaces on the same rim. So.121) ∂x ∂y ∂z Consider. It is clear that v · dS = 0 for any closed surface. A · dS = A · dS. The surface integral S ρv · dS is the net rate of mass ﬂow out of the closed surface S. Thus. Thus.
for any volume. It follows from the divergence theorem that div(ρv) = − ∂ρ . ∂t (2.123)
This is called the equation of continuity of the ﬂuid, since it ensures that ﬂuid is neither created nor destroyed as it ﬂows from place to place. If ρ is constant then the equation of continuity reduces to the previous incompressible result div v = 0. It is sometimes helpful to represent a vector ﬁeld A by “lines of force” or “ﬁeld lines.” The direction of a line of force at any point is the same as the direction of A. The density of lines (i.e., the number of lines crossing a unit surface perpendicular to A) is equal to A. In the diagram, A is larger at point
1
2
1 than at point 2. The number of lines crossing a surface element dS is A · dS. So, the net number of lines leaving a closed surface is A · dS = div A dV.
V
(2.124)
S
If div A = 0 then there is no net ﬂux of lines out of any surface, which mean that the lines of force must form closed loops. Such a ﬁeld is called a solenoidal vector ﬁeld.
37
2.16
The Laplacian
So far we have encountered grad φ = ∂φ ∂φ ∂φ , , ∂x ∂y ∂z , (2.125)
which is a vector ﬁeld formed from a scalar ﬁeld, and div A = ∂Ay ∂Az ∂Ax + + , ∂x ∂y ∂z (2.126)
which is a scalar ﬁeld formed from a vector ﬁeld. There are two ways in which we can combine grad and div. We can either form the vector ﬁeld grad(div A) or the scalar ﬁeld div(grad φ). The former is not particularly interesting, but the scalar ﬁeld div(grad φ) turns up in a great many physics problems and is, therefore, worthy of discussion. Let us introduce the heat ﬂow vector h which is the rate of ﬂow of heat energy per unit area across a surface perpendicular to the direction of h. In many substances heat ﬂows directly down the temperature gradient, so that we can write h = −κ grad T, (2.127)
where κ is the thermal conductivity. The net rate of heat ﬂow S h · dS out of some closed surface S must be equal to the rate of decrease of heat energy in the volume V enclosed by S. Thus, we can write h · dS = − ∂ ∂t c T dV , (2.128)
S
where c is the speciﬁc heat. It follows from the divergence theorem that div h = −c ∂T . ∂t (2.129)
Taking the divergence of both sides of Eq. (2.127), and making use of Eq. (2.129), we obtain ∂T div (κ grad T ) = c , (2.130) ∂t 38
∂T . ∂t If κ is constant then the above equation can be written · (κ T ) = c div(grad T ) = The scalar ﬁeld div(grad T ) takes the form div(grad T ) = = ∂ ∂T ∂x ∂x + ∂ ∂y ∂T ∂y +
2
or
(2.131)
c ∂T . κ ∂t
(2.132)
∂ ∂z T.
∂T ∂z (2.133)
∂2T ∂2T ∂2T + + ≡ ∂x2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2
Here, the scalar diﬀerential operator
2
≡
∂2 ∂2 ∂2 + 2+ 2 ∂x2 ∂y ∂z
(2.134)
is called the Laplacian. The Laplacian is a good scalar operator (i.e., it is coordinate independent) because it is formed from a combination of div (another good scalar operator) and grad (a good vector operator). What is the physical signiﬁcance of the Laplacian? In onedimension 2 T reduces to ∂ 2 T /∂x2 . Now, ∂ 2 T /∂x2 is positive if T (x) is concave (from above)
T
+ 
+
x
39
and negative if it is convex. So, if T is less than the average of T in its surroundings then 2 T is positive, and vice versa. In two dimensions
2
∂2T ∂2T T = + . ∂x2 ∂y 2
(2.135)
Consider a local minimum of the temperature. At the minimum the slope of T increases in all directions so 2 T is positive. Likewise, 2 T is negative at a local maximum. Consider, now, a steepsided valley in T . Suppose that the bottom of the valley runs parallel to the xaxis. At the bottom of the valley ∂ 2 T /∂y 2 is large and positive, whereas ∂ 2 T /∂x2 is small and may even be negative. Thus, 2 T is positive, and this is associated with T being less than the average local value T . Let us now return to the heat conduction problem:
2
T =
c ∂T . κ ∂t
(2.136)
It is clear that if 2 T is positive then T is locally less than the average value, so ∂T /∂t > 0; i.e., the region heats up. Likewise, if 2 T is negative then T is locally greater than the average value and heat ﬂows out of the region; i.e., ∂T /∂t < 0. Thus, the above heat conduction equation makes physical sense.
2.17
Curl
Consider a vector ﬁeld A and a loop which lies in one plane. The integral of A around this loop is written A · dl, where dl is a line element of the loop. If A is a conservative ﬁeld then A = grad φ and A · dl = 0 for all loops. For a nonconservative ﬁeld A · dl = 0, in general. For a small loop we expect A · dl to be proportional to the area of the loop. Moreover, for a ﬁxed area loop we expect A · dl to depend on the orientation of the loop. One particular orientation will give the maximum value: A·dl = Imax . If the loop subtends an angle θ with this optimum orientation then we expect
40
Let us now express curl A in terms of the components of A.137) dS→0 for the orientation giving Imax . the total of all contributions gives A · dl = ∂Ay ∂Az − ∂y ∂z (2.138) −Ay (z + dz) dy + Ay (z) dy = − So. 41 . we shall evaluate A·dl around a small rectangle in the yz plane.I = Imax cos θ. dS is the area of the loop. The direction of curl A is perpendicular to the plane of the loop. Here. Let us introduce the vector ﬁeld curl A whose magnitude is curl A = lim A · dl dS (2. ∂y (2. First. The contribution from z 4 z+dz 1 z y 2 y+dy 3 y sides 1 and 3 is Az (y + dy) dz − Az (y) dz = The contribution from sides 2 and 4 is ∂Az dy dz. ∂y ∂Ay dy dz. (2.140) where dS = dy dz is the area of the loop.139) dS. when it is in the orientation giving Imax . with the sense given by the righthand grip rule assuming that the loop is righthanded.
the area of the outer loop is the sum of all the areas of the inner loops.143) Imagine an arbitrary loop of vector area dS = (dSx . 0) and A · dl = ∂Az ∂Ax − ∂z ∂x dSy . (2. 0) of any shape in the yz plane. dS y . y. We conclude that A · dl = ∂Az ∂Ay − ∂y ∂z dSx (2. Also.Consider a nonrectangular (but still small) loop in the yz plane. We can divide it into rectangular elements and form A · dl over all the resultant loops. if the loop is in the xy plane then dS = (0.142) Finally. We can construct this out of three loops in the x. If we form the line integral around all three loops then the intez dS 2 3 x 1 y rior contributions cancel and we are left with the line integral around the original 42 . we can show that if the loop is in the xz plane then dS = (0.141) is valid for a small loop dS = (dSx . dSz ). dS z ) and A · dl = ∂Ay ∂Ax − ∂x ∂y dSz . so we are just left with the contribution from the outer loop. and z directions. as indicated in the diagram below. (2. dSy . Likewise. The interior contributions cancel. 0. 0.
− .147) This demonstrates that curl A is a good vector ﬁeld. Consider a circular loop. (2. 2ω. curl v = (0.148) ∂Ay ∂Ax ∂Az ∂Ay ∂Ax ∂Az − . so the rotation velocity at position r is v =ω∧r (2. a vector ﬁeld with curl A = 0 everywhere is said to be irrotational. on the axis curl v = (0. 0. Thus.. 2ω) everywhere in the body. Hence. If we imagine A as the velocity ﬁeld of some ﬂuid then curl A at any given point is equal to twice the local angular rotation velocity. i. 0. This is plainly zero. − ∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂y . 2ω).e. (2. Thus. which is independent of r. the ycomponent is also zero. This allows us to form a physical picture of curl A.149) The ﬁrst part has the same curl as the velocity ﬁeld on the axis. at position r0 . 43 . Consider a solid body rotating about the zaxis. 0. (2.145) A · dl1 + A · dl2 + A · dl3 . A · dl = giving A · dl = curl A · dS = curl AdS cos θ. where curl A = Note that curl A = ∧ A.loop. Oﬀ the axis. and the second part has zero curl since it is constant. ω). Let us evaluate curl v on the axis of rotation. (2. we can write v = ω ∧ (r − r0 ) + ω ∧ r0 . since it is the cross product of the operator (a good vector operator) and the vector ﬁeld A.144) [see Eq.146) (2. Likewise. We have v · dl = 2πr ωr with dS = πr 2 . The angular velocity is given by ω = (0. (2. It follows that (curl v)z = 2ω. r is the radial distance from the rotation axis. The xcomponent is proportional to the integral v · dl around a loop in the yz plane. So. The zcomponent is v · dl/dS around some loop in the xy plane.39) ]. Here.
All of the contributions from the interior loops cancel. In other words.Another important result of vector ﬁeld theory is the curl theorem or Stokes’ theorem: A · dl = curl A · dS.” Consider two surfaces. This is entirely equivalent to A = grad φ. which share the same rim. div(curl A) ≡ 0. However. curl A is a solenoidal ﬁeld. C One immediate consequence of of Stokes’ theorem is that curl A is “incompressible. the ﬁeldlines of curl A never begin or end. We have seen that for a conservative ﬁeld A · dl = 0 for any loop. It is clear from Stokes’ theorem that curl A · dS is the same for both surfaces. Hence. leaving just the contribution from the outer rim. (2. (2. Making use of Eq. it follows that curl A · dS = 0 for any closed surface.151) So.150) C S for some (nonplanar) surface S bounded by a rim C. we can see that the contribution from all of the loops is also equal to the integral of curl A · dS across the whole surface. (2. However. Thus. This proves the theorem. we have from the divergence theorem that curl A · dS = div(curl A) dV = 0 for any volume.145) for each of the small loops. S1 and S2 . This theorem can easily be proved by splitting the loop up into many small rectangular loops and forming the integral around all of the resultant loops. the magnitude of curl A is 44 .
nay .18 Summary a + b ≡ (ax + bx . 2. It should be emphasized. however. 2 Ay .153) (2. curl(grad φ) ≡ 0. that the above result is only valid in Cartesian coordinates. az + bz ) Vector addition: Vector multiplication: na ≡ (nax . 2 Az ).limdS→0 A · dl/dS for some particular loop. a conservative ﬁeld is also an irrotational one. ay + by . az bx − ax bz .154) A=( 2 Ax . Finally. ax by − ay bx ) Scalar triple product: a · b ∧ c = a ∧ b · c = b · c ∧ a = −b · a ∧ c 45 .152) A. naz ) Scalar product: a · b = a x bx + a y by + a z bz Vector product: a ∧ b = (ay bz − az by . It is clear then that curl A = 0 for a conservative ﬁeld. Thus. (2. it can be shown that curl(curl A) = grad(div A) − where 2 2 (2. In other words.
∂x ∂y ∂z φ ·A ∧A grad φ = div A = curl A = Vector identities: · φ= 2 φ= ∂2φ ∂2φ ∂2φ + 2 + 2 ∂x2 ∂y ∂z 46 . − ∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂y A · dS = div A dV V Stokes’ theorem: C A · dl = S curl A · dS Del operator: = ∂ ∂ ∂ . . .Vector triple product: a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a · c)b − (a · b)c (a ∧ b) ∧ c = (a · c)b − (b · c)a Gradient: grad φ = Divergence: div A = Curl: curl A = Gauss’ theorem: S ∂φ ∂φ ∂φ . ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂Ay ∂Az ∂Ax + + ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂Ay ∂Ax ∂Az ∂Ay ∂Ax ∂Az − . − .
· 2 ∧A=0 ∧ φ=0 ∧ ∧A · A) − A= ( Other vector identities: (φψ) = φ (ψ) + ψ (φ) · (φA) = φ ∧ (φA) = φ · (A ∧ B) = B · ∧ (A ∧ B) = A( (A · B) = A ∧ ( · B) − B( ∧ B) + B ∧ ( ·A+A· ∧A+ ∧A−A· · A) + (B · ∧ A) + (A · φ φ∧A ∧B )A − (A · )B + (B · )B )A Acknowledgment This section is almost entirely based on my undergraduate notes taken during a course of lectures given by Dr. 47 . Cambridge. Steven Gull of the Cavendish Laboratory.
are located at position vectors r1 and r2 . The universal constant 0 is called the “permittivity of free space” and takes the value 0 = 8. (3. 48 .6022 × 10 −19 C. Suppose that two masses. are located at position vectors r1 and r2 . inversesquare. The SI unit of electric charge is q f1 1 r2 _ r1 q 2 f2 r1 r2 the coulomb (C).1 Maxwell’s equations Coulomb’s law Between 1785 and 1787 the French physicist Charles Augustine de Coulomb performed a series of experiments involving electric charges and eventually established what is nowadays known as “Coulomb’s law. q1 and q2 . The charge of an electron is 1. Two like charges repel one another whereas two unlike charges attract.3 3.8542 × 10−12 C2 N−1 m−2 . in accordance with Newton’s third law of motion.2) Coulomb’s law has the same mathematical form as Newton’s law of gravity. The electrical force acting on the second charge is written f2 = q1 q2 r2 − r 1 4π 0 r2 − r1 3 (3.1) in vector notation. Suppose that two charges.” According to this law the force acting between two charges is radial. An equal and opposite force acts on the ﬁrst charge. m1 and m2 . and proportional to the product of the charges.
f2  ∝ 1 . i. The force which causes the Earth to orbit the Sun is also gravity. so felectrical  = 4.3) in vector notation.” In fact.The gravitational force acting on the second mass is written f2 = −Gm1 m2 r2 − r 1 r2 − r1 3 (3.e. Coulomb’s law and Newton’s law are both “inversesquare”. the force due to gravity is always attractive (there is no such thing as a negative mass!). fgravitational  m1 m2 4π 0 G For electrons the charge to mass ratio q/m = 1.6) This is a colossal number! Suppose you had a homework problem involving the motion of particles in a box under the action of two forces with the same range but diﬀering in magnitude by a factor 1042 . on 49 . the magnitudes of the two forces are vastly diﬀerent. most people would write this even if the forces diﬀered in magnitude by a factor 10! Applying this reasoning to the motion of particles in the universe we would expect the universe to be governed entirely by electrical forces.4) However. The force which holds us to the surface of the Earth. fgravitational  (3. and is given by q1 q2 1 felectrical  = . In fact.7) (3.5) (3. r2 − r1 2 (3.17 × 1042 . However. I think that most people would write on line one something like “it is a good approximation to neglect the weaker force in favour of the stronger one. independent of the relative positions of the particles.759 × 10 11 C kg−1 . this is not the case. is gravity. The gravitational constant G takes the value G = 6. Consider the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces acting on two particles. and prevents us from ﬂoating oﬀ into space. Secondly. Firstly.6726 × 10−11 N m2 kg−2 . This ratio is a constant. they diﬀer in two crucial respects.
e. it is pretty close. The electrical forces due to the charges in each pair eﬀectively cancel one another out on lengthscales much larger than the mutual spacing of the pair. But. As far as we know. In fact. So. It is only possible for gravity to be the dominant longrange force if the number of positive charges in the universe is almost equal to the number of negative charges. After a bit we expect the positive and negative charges to form close pairs. So.e. i. In fact. about 10 −10 m. we expect electrical forces to completely dominate gravity. To date no elementary particle reactions have been discovered which create or destroy net electric charge. Even if this were to go on at a very low rate it would not take long before the ﬁne balance between positive and negative charges in the universe were wrecked. it is not enough for the universe to start out with zero charge. this is the case. but is usually “hidden” away inside neutral atoms. These forces try to make every positive charge get as far away as possible from other positive charges and as close as possible to other negative charges. positive and negative charges have to cancel each other out to such accuracy that most physicists believe that the net charge of the universe is exactly zero. the charge of the universe can neither increase or decrease). Just how close is determined by quantum mechanics but. this is electromag50 . Initially. in general. In order for the cancellation of longrange electrical forces to be eﬀective the relative diﬀerence in the number of positive and negative charges in the universe must be incredibly small. Suppose there were some elementary particle process which did not conserve electric charge. it is important that electric charge is a conserved quantity (i. In summary. electrical forces are basically what prevent us from falling though the ﬂoor.. But.. for the sake of argument. The ﬁne balance of forces due to negative and positive electric charges starts to break down on atomic scales. there are two longrange forces in the universe. In this situation every positive change can ﬁnd a negative charge to team up with and there are virtually no charges left over. electromagnetism and gravity. The former is enormously stronger than the latter. Suppose. The key to understanding this paradox is that there are both positive and negative electric charges whereas there are only positive gravitational “charges. interatomic and intermolecular forces are electrical in nature.” This means that gravitational forces are always cumulative whereas electrical forces can cancel one another out. that the universe starts out with randomly distributed electric charges.astronomical lengthscales gravity is the dominant force and electrical forces are largely irrelevant.
equal and opposite forces act on the two charges or masses at all times. The second charge or mass only ﬁnds out about this some time later.. In particular. Of course. Coulomb’s law and Newton’s law are both examples of what are usually referred to as “action at a distance” theories. this cannot be correct according to Einstein’s theory of relativity. In electromagnetism there are. So. called a ﬁeld. Electromagnetic forces are transmitted though these ﬁelds at the speed of light. if the ﬁrst charge or mass is moved then the force acting on the second charge or mass immediately responds. Newton’s third law is intimately tied up with the conservation of momentum in the universe. which implies that the laws of relativity are never violated. This means that even when the actions and reactions 51 . electromagnetism on lengthscales much larger than the atomic scale.netism on the microscopic or atomic scale. during this period there is an action but no reaction. It turns out that we can “rescue” momentum conservation by abandoning “action at a distance” theories and adopting socalled “ﬁeld” theories in which there is a medium. The maximum speed with which information can propagate through the universe is the speed of light. Of course. in fact. so that the close pairing of negative and positive charges is disrupted.” This course is about “classical electromagnetism”. This allows electrical forces to manifest themselves on macroscopic lengthscales. However. that Newton’s third law of motion is not strictly true. A concept which most physicists are loath to abandon. According to Eqs.3). It is clear that “action at a distance” is not compatible with relativity and. what is usually known as “quantum electromagnetism. the ﬁelds can soak up energy and momentum. Moreover. (3. So. consequently. Suppose the ﬁrst charge or mass is suddenly annihilated. which violates Newton’s third law of motion. the electric ﬁeld and the magnetic ﬁeld. which transmits the force from one particle to another. It is no coincidence that the vast majority of useful machines which mankind has devised during the last century are electromagnetic in nature. Consider a rather extreme example. two ﬁelds. very little disruption is necessary before gigantic forces are generated. During this time interval the second charge or mass experiences an electrical or gravitational force which is as if the ﬁrst charge or mass were still there.e. that is.1) and (3. if the ﬁrst charge or mass is moved then there must always be time delay (i. Classical electromagnetism generally describes phenomena in which some sort of “violence” is done to matter. at least the time needed for a light signal to propagate between the two charges or masses) before the second charge or mass responds.
acting on particles are not quite equal and opposite. 4π 0 r − ri 3 (3. it is just a useful device for calculating the force which acts on test charges placed at various locations. which are located at position vectors r1 through rN .9) and the electric ﬁeld is given by N E(r) = i=1 qi r − r i . the force on a test charge is written f = q E. this is how we shall proceed. For the moment. which is the force exerted on a unit test charge located at position vector r. 52 . points outwards if the charge is positive. the electrical force exerted by the ith charge (say) on the test charge is the same as if all the other charges were not there. the force acting on the test charge is given by N f (r) = q i=1 qi r − r i . So.10) At this point. Thus. In other words. Consider N charges.11) 4π 0 r2 where r = r. and has magnitude q Er (r) = . 4π 0 r − ri 3 (3. inwards if it is negative. Electrical forces obey what is known as the principle of superposition. we have no reason to believe that the electric ﬁeld has any real existence. momentum is still conserved. The electrical force acting on a test charge q at position vector r is simply the vector sum of all of the Coulomb law forces from each of the N charges taken in isolation. The electric ﬁeld from a single charge q located at the origin is purely radial. (3.8) It is helpful to deﬁne a vector ﬁeld E(r). q1 though qN . called the electric ﬁeld. We can bypass some of the problematic aspects of “action at a distance” by only considering steadystate situations. (3.
E q We can represent an electric ﬁeld by “ﬁeldlines. the charge at position vector r is ρ(r ) d3 r . over all space for which ρ(r ) is nonzero. Thus.10) that the electric ﬁeld generated by this charge distribution is E(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) r−r d3 r . Suppose that. or.” The direction of the lines indicates the direction of the local electric ﬁeld and the density of the lines perpendicular to this direction is proportional to the magnitude of the local electric ﬁeld. at least. In other words.12) where the volume integral is over all space. (3. we have a continuous distribution of charge represented by a charge density ρ(r). electric ﬁelds are completely superposable. Thus. 53 . It follows from a simple extension of Eq. the ﬁeld of a point positive charge is represented by a group of equally spaced straight lines radiating from the charge. where d3 r is the volume element at r . instead of having discrete charges. The electric ﬁeld from a collection of charges is simply the vector sum of the ﬁelds from each of the charges taken in isolation. 3 r − r  (3.
16) (3. ∂/∂y. y. [(x − x )2 + (y − y )2 + (z − z )2 ]3/2 However. z ) in Cartesian coordinates. it is easily demonstrated that x−x = [(x − x )2 + (y − y )2 + (z − z )2 ]3/2 − (3.3.17) Thus. The x component of (r − r )/r − r 3 is written x−x . The scalar potential generated by a charge q located at the origin is φ(r) = q .18) 54 . 4π 0 r (3. and this potential can be expressed as a simple volume integral involving the charge distribution.13) 1 ∂ . It follows from Eq. r − r  (3.2 The electric scalar potential Suppose that r = (x.14) ∂x [(x − x )2 + (y − y )2 + (z − z )2 ]1/2 1 r − r  Since there is nothing special about the xaxis we can write r−r =− r − r 3 . the electric ﬁeld generated by a collection of ﬁxed charges can be written as the gradient of a scalar potential.15) where ≡ (∂/∂x. (3. y . (3. where φ(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 3 d r. z) and r = (x . ∂/∂z) is a diﬀerential operator which involves the components of r but not those of r . (3.12) that E = − φ.
the scalar potential is just the sum of the potentials generated by each of the charges taken in isolation.10) the scalar potential generated by a set of N discrete charges qi . the work done on the particle is simply minus its charge times the diﬀerence in electric potential between the end point and the beginning point. (3. this result follows immediately from vector ﬁeld theory once we are told.9) and (3. 4π 0 r − ri  (3.22) Thus. (3. (3. that the electric ﬁeld is the gradient of a scalar potential. This implies from Stokes’ theorem that ∧E =0 55 (3.21) where f is the electrical force and dl is a line element along the path. so E · dl = 0 (3. in Eq.19) where φi (r) = Thus. (3. (3.According to Eq. The net work done on the particle by electrical forces is Q qi . Suppose that a particle of charge q is taken along some path from point P to point Q. (3. an electric ﬁeld generated by stationary charges is an example of a conservative ﬁeld.24) . So.20) W = P f · dl.16).16) we obtain Q Q W =q P E · dl = −q P φ · dl = −q ( φ(Q) − φ(P ) ) . is N φ(r) = i=1 φi (r). Making use of Eqs. In fact.23) C for any closed loop C. located at ri . This quantity is clearly independent of the path taken from P to Q. The work done on the particle when it is taken around a closed path is zero.
Therefore. which is equivalent to a joule per coulomb. Thus. the work done on the particle as it moves from P to Q is minus the diﬀerence in its gravitational potential energy between points Q and P . is given by E(Q) = q φ(Q).25) Free particles try to move down gradients of potential energy in order to attain a minimum potential energy state. Likewise. (3.16). (3. The SI unit of electric potential is the volt. the work done in taking a particle between two points is path independent and. relative to some reference point P .24) also follows directly from Eq. according to Eq. Equation (3. since ∧ φ = 0 for any scalar potential φ. It follows from Eq. it only makes sense to talk about gravitational potential energy because the gravitational ﬁeld is conservative.22) that the potential energy of the particle at a general point Q. positive charges moving in an electric ﬁeld tend to migrate towards regions with the most negative voltage and vice versa for negative charges. The scalar electric potential is undeﬁned to an additive constant. In follows that we can deﬁne an electrical potential energy of a particle moving in such a ﬁeld. We are familiar with the idea that a particle moving in a gravitational ﬁeld possesses potential energy as well as kinetic energy. We have already seen that an electric ﬁeld generated by stationary charges is a conservative ﬁeld.22) the electrical work done on a particle when it is taken between two points is the product of its charge and the voltage diﬀerence between the points. This means that the diﬀerence in potential energy of the particle between the beginning and end points is also well deﬁned. So. If the particle moves from point P to a lower point Q then the gravitational ﬁeld does work on the particle causing its kinetic energy to increase. free particles in the Earth’s gravitational ﬁeld tend to fall downwards. (3. well deﬁned. the 56 . Thus. By analogy with gravitational ﬁelds. Of course.for any electric ﬁeld generated by stationary charges. therefore. (3. Thus. the work done in taking a particle from point P to point Q is equal to minus the diﬀerence in potential energy of the particle between points Q and P . The increase in kinetic energy of the particle is balanced by an equal decrease in its potential energy so that the overall energy of the particle is a conserved quantity.
16). The potential can be ﬁxed unambiguously by specifying its value at a single point.11). This convention is implicit in Eq. However. The ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld through this surface is given by S V q r S E · dS = Er dSr = Er (r) 4πr 2 = S q 4π 0 r2 4πr2 = q 0 .transformation φ(r) → φ(r) + c (3. (3.3 Gauss’ law Consider a single charge located at the origin. (3. The usual convention is to say that the potential is zero at inﬁnity. Suppose that we surround the charge by a concentric spherical surface S of radius r.27) since the normal to the surface is always parallel to the local electric ﬁeld.17). where it can be seen that φ → 0 as r → ∞ provided that the total charge ρ(r ) d3 r is ﬁnite. (3.28) S V 57 . we also know from Gauss’ theorem that E · dS = · E d3 r. (3. (3.26) leaves the electric ﬁeld unchanged according to Eq. 3. The electric ﬁeld generated by such a charge is given by Eq.
(3. Let us examine how we might construct a onedimensional “spike” function. In (3.31) ∂x r Formulae analogous to Eq. r5 0 (3. (3.30) 0 ∂r x = . The divergence of the ﬁeld is given by ∂Ex ∂Ey ∂Ez q ·E = + + = ∂x ∂y ∂z 4π 3r2 − 3x2 − 3y 2 − 3z 2 = 0. . (3.27) and (3.32) This is a puzzling result! We have from Eqs. where it becomes very large. r5 0 q 4π 0 · E directly. (3. (3. Thus. r3 r3 r3 (3. use has been made of 3x x 1 − 4 r3 r r q = 4π r2 − 3x2 . ) = 1/ 0 for x < /2 otherwise. (3. it is zero everywhere except arbitrarily close to the origin. Let us evaluate Cartesian coordinates the ﬁeld is written E= where r2 = x2 + y 2 + z 2 . This must occur in such a manner that the volume integral over the “spike” is ﬁnite.where V is the volume enclosed by surface S.28) that · E d3 r = q 0 . i.32) and (3.. (3. which means that · E can take any value at this point. Consider the “boxcar” function g(x.32).e. At the origin (r = 0) we ﬁnd that · E = 0/0. ∂Ex q = ∂x 4π Here.30) can be obtained for ∂E y /∂y and ∂Ez /∂z.33) V and yet we have just proved that · E = 0.29) x y z . . Eqs. So.34) 58 . This paradox can be resolved after a close examination of Eq.33) can be reconciled if · E is some sort of “spike” function.
−∞ (3. The onedimensional “spike” function δ(x) is called the “Dirac deltafunction” after the Cambridge physicist Paul Dirac who invented it in 1927 while investigating quantum mechanics.36) Now consider the function δ(x) = lim g(x.38) where f (x) is a function which is wellbehaved in the vicinity of x = 0. ) dx = 1.39) 59 . →0 This is zero everywhere except arbitrarily close to x = 0. −∞ (3. (3. The deltafunction is an example of what mathematicians call a “generalized function”. ).35) (3. According to Eq. −∞ (3.37) Thus. Consider the integral ∞ f (x) δ(x) dx.35). it is not welldeﬁned at x = 0.g(x) 1/ε −ε/2 ε/2 x It is clear that that ∞ g(x. Since the deltafunction is zero everywhere apart from very close to x = 0. it also possess a ﬁnite integral. (3. it is clear that ∞ ∞ f (x) δ(x) dx = f (0) −∞ −∞ δ(x) dx = f (0). but its integral is nevertheless welldeﬁned. ∞ δ(x) dx = 1. δ(x) has all of the required properties of a “spike” function.
(3.41) This function is clearly zero everywhere except the origin. (3. (3. (3. which is a “spike” function centred on x = x0 .37).42) The integral can be turned into an integral over all space by taking the limit a → ∞ ∞. (3. we can change variables and write δ(r − r ) = δ(x − x )δ(y − y )δ(z − z ).44) where f (r) is any wellbehaved scalar ﬁeld. But is its volume integral unity? Let us integrate over a cube of dimensions 2a which is centred on the origin and aligned along the Cartesian axes.39) gives ∞ −∞ f (x) δ(x − x0 ) dx = f (x0 ). This volume integral is obviously separable. which is valid for any wellbehaved function f (x). i. so that a a a δ(r) d r = −a 3 δ(x) dx −a δ(y) dy −a δ(z) dz. A simple change of variables allows us to deﬁne δ(x − x0 ). a function which is zero everywhere apart from close to the origin. A simple generalization of previous arguments yields f (r) δ(r) d3 r = f (0).where use has been made of Eq. and whose volume integral is unity. Equation (3.. (3. so it follows from the above equation that δ(r) d3 r = 1. Finally.43) which is the desired result. we know that for onedimensional deltafunctions −∞ δ(x) dx = 1.45) 60 .40) We actually want a threedimensional “spike” function. However. The above equation. If we denote this function by δ(r) then it is easily seen that the threedimensional deltafunction is the product of three onedimensional deltafunctions: δ(r) = δ(x)δ(y)δ(z). is eﬀectively the deﬁnition of a deltafunction. (3.e.
At this stage.which is a threedimensional “spike” function centred on r = r .43). The electric ﬁeld generated by a charge q located at the origin has · E = 0 everywhere apart from the origin.48).27) ] using conventional analysis! Let me now demonstrate the power of vector ﬁeld theory. the ﬂux becomes zero when the displacement is suﬃciently large that the origin is 61 . However. These two facts imply that ·E = where use has been made of Eq. It is easily demonstrated that f (r) δ(r − r ) d3 r = f (r ). so that it is no longer centered on the origin. the integral is zero if V does not contain r = r . (3. again.48) from Gauss’ theorem. Suppose that we now displace the surface S. plus Eq. However. and also satisﬁes q (3. Consider. it is clear that the ﬂux of E out of S is q/ 0 for a spherical surface displaced from the origin. (3. What is the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld out of S? This is no longer a simple problem for conventional analysis because the normal to the surface is not parallel to the local electric ﬁeld. Let us now return to the problem in hand. (3. Likewise.46) Up to now we have only considered volume integrals taken over all space. (3. However. you are probably not all that impressed with vector ﬁeld theory.47) · E d3 r = V 0 for a spherical volume V centered on the origin. (3. a charge q at the origin surrounded by a spherical surface S which is centered on the origin. From these. it should be obvious that the above result also holds for integrals over any ﬁnite volume V which contains the point r = r .49) S V q 0 δ(r). After all we have just spent an inordinately long time proving something using vector ﬁeld theory which we previously proved in one line [see Eq. We have E · dS = · E d3 r (3. using vector ﬁeld theory this problem is no more diﬃcult than the previous one.
This result is independent of the shape of S. Gauss’ theorem and Eq.S q no longer enclosed by the sphere. What now is the ﬂux of E out of S? This is a virtually impossible problem in conventional analysis. and that the ﬂux is zero otherwise.48) tell us that the ﬂux is q/ 0 provided that the surface contains the origin. S q Consider N charges qi located at ri . but it is not easy! Suppose that the surface S is not spherical but is instead highly distorted. (3. but it is easy using vector ﬁeld theory. (3. It is possible to prove this from conventional analysis. A simple generalization of Eq.48) 62 .
(3. (3. dy. (3. Equation (3.53) is only valid for electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charge distributions. (3.53) is universally valid. In principle. We already know the solution to this equation when the charges are stationary. This result is called Gauss’ law and does not depend on the shape of the surface.gives N ·E = qi 0 i=1 δ(r − ri ). additional terms might be required to describe ﬁelds generated by moving charge distributions. 3 r − r  (3.51). it turns out that this is not the case and that Eq. it is given by Eq. if we integrate · E over this volume element we obtain ρ dx dy dz Q = .53) is a diﬀerential equation describing the electric ﬁeld generated by a set of charges. which together form a complete description of electromagnetism. The charge contained in a small rectangular volume of dimensions dx. the volume element is assumed to be suﬃciently small that · E does not vary signiﬁcantly across it. and dz. located at position r is Q = ρ(r) dx dy dz. our derivation of Eq. (3.49) implies that E · dS = · E d3 r = Q 0 . Suppose. (3. called Maxwell’s equations. However.54) 63 . Thus. we obtain ρ ·E = . (3.12): E(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) r−r d3 r . ﬁnally. However. (3. Gauss’ theorem (3.50) Thus.51) S V where Q is the total charge enclosed by the surface S. that instead of having a set of discrete charges we have a continuous charge distribution described by a charge density ρ(r).52) · E dx dy dz = 0 0 where use has been made of Eq. Of course. Here.53) 0 This is the ﬁrst of four ﬁeld equations.
53) and (3.56) δ(r − r ) d3 r = ρ(r) 0 which is the desired result. (3. so that E = − φ.57) S 3. The most general form of Gauss’ law.59) This is an example of a very famous type of partial diﬀerential equation known as “Poisson’s equation.55) where use has been made of Eq.54) can be reconciled provided · r−r r − r 3 =− 2 1 r − r  = 4π δ(r − r ). (3. (3.51). (3.58) This equation can be combined with the ﬁeld equation (3. Eq. It follows that · E(r) = = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 0 ρ(r ) · r−r r − r 3 d3 r . (3.60) . 64 (3. (3.15).Equations (3. is obtained by integrating Eq. (3.53) over a volume V surrounded by a surface S and making use of Gauss’ theorem: E · dS = 1 0 V ρ(r) d3 r. (3.53) to give a partial diﬀerential equation for the scalar potential: 2 φ=− ρ 0 .4 Poisson’s equation We have seen that the electric ﬁeld generated by a set of stationary charges can be written as the gradient of a scalar potential.” In its most general form Poisson’s equation is written 2 u = v.
Any general source function can be built up out of a set of suitably weighted point sources. In mathematical terminology this function is known as a “Green’s function. Suppose that we could construct all of the solutions generated by point sources.64) We can easily demonstrate that this is the correct solution: 2 u(r) = 2 G(r.61) then the potential generated by v1 + v2 is u1 + u2 .63) which goes to zero as r → ∞.where u(r) is some scalar potential which is to be determined and v(r) is a known “source function.” The solution generated by a general source function v(r) is simply the appropriately weighted sum of all of the Green’s function solutions: u(r) = G(r. if u1 is the potential generated by the source function v1 .62) Poisson’s equation has this property because it is linear in both the potential and the source term. (3. Thus. (3. since 2 (u1 + u2 ) = 2 u1 + 2 u2 = v 1 + v 2 . r )v(r ) d3 r . and u2 is the potential generated by the source function v2 . u2 = v 2 . r ) v(r ) d3 r = δ(r − r ) v(r ) d3 r = v(r). The function G(r. The fact that the solutions to Poisson’s equation are superposable suggests a general method for solving this equation. The solutions to Poisson’s equation are completely superposable. Of course. r ) is the solution generated by a point source located at position r . r ) = δ(r − r ) (3. (3.” The most common boundary condition applied to this equation is that the potential u is zero at inﬁnity. so the general solution of Poisson’s equation must be expressible as a weighted sum over the point source solutions. Thus. so that 2 2 u1 = v 1 . once we know all of the point source solutions we can construct any other solution. these solutions must satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions.65) 65 . (3. In mathematical terminology we require the solution to 2 G(r.
68) In fact. This is hardly surprising given the deﬁnition of a Green’s function. 3. (3. he noticed that the needle of a compass he was holding was deﬂected when he moved it close to a current carrying wire. It follows from Eq.63) with G → ∞ as r → 0. r ) = − 1 1 .59): 2 φ=− ρ 0 . Amp`re’s apparatus consisted (essentially) of a long straight wire carrying e an electric current current I. much to his surprise. we have already obtained this solution by another method [see Eq.20) that the Green’s function has the same form as the potential generated by a point charge. Word of this discovery spread quickly along the scientiﬁc grapevine. (3. (3.67) Note from Eq. It follows from Eq.55) that G(r.17) ].66) The Green’s function for this equation satisﬁes Eq.Let us return to Eq. the circulation of the loops is given 66 . r − r  (3.67) that the general solution to Poisson’s equation (3. (3. (3.5 Amp`re’s experiments e In 1820 the Danish physicist Hans Christian Ørsted was giving a lecture demonstration of various electrical and magnetic eﬀects. and the French physicist Andre Marie Amp`re immediately decided to investigate fure ther. Up until then magnetism has been thought of as solely a property of some rather unusual rocks called loadstones. (3. Using this convention. Suddenly. 4π r − r  (3.66) is written φ(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 3 d r.64) and (3. (3. Amp`re quickly discovered that the needle of a small e compass maps out a series of concentric circular loops in the plane perpendicular to a current carrying wire. The direction of circulation around these magnetic loops is conventionally taken to be the direction in which the north pole of the compass needle points.
Amp`re’s next series of experiments involved bringing a short test wire. close to the original wire and investigating the force exerted on the test wire. This experiment is not quite as clear cut as Coulomb’s experiment I currentcarrying test wire I / because. if the feed wires are twisted around each other. they have to ﬂow in complete circuits. We must imagine that the circuit which connects with the central wire is suﬃciently far away that it has no appreciable inﬂuence on the outcome of the experiment. as indicated in the diagram.I direction of north pole of compass needle by a righthand rule: if the thumb of the righthand points along the direction of the current then the ﬁngers of the righthand circulate in the same sense as the magnetic loops. care rying a current I . electric currents cannot exist as point entities. The circuit which connects with the test wire is more problematic. Fortunately. unlike electric charges. then they eﬀectively cancel one another 67 .
F .e. the SI unit of electric current is the ampere (A). Finally. The SI unit of magnetic ﬁeld strength is the tesla (T). If the current in the test wire is reversed then the two wires repel one another. the test current) ﬂows parallel to the current in the central wire then the two wires attract one another. so that it starts parallel to the central current and ends up pointing radially towards it. Amp`re was able to establish that the e attractive force between two parallel current carrying wires is proportional to the product of the two currents. If the test current points radially towards the central wire (and the current in the central wire ﬂows upwards) then the test wire is subject to a downwards force. then the force on the test wire is of constant magnitude and is always at right angles to the test current. which is the same as a newton per ampere per meter. If the test current is rotated in a single plane. The dependence of the force per unit length. This rather complicated force law can be summed up succinctly in vector notation provided that we deﬁne a vector ﬁeld B. then the magnitude of the force on the test wire attenuates like cos θ (where θ is the angle the current is turned through. acting on a test wire with the diﬀerent possible orientations of the test current is described by F = I ∧ B.. called the magnetic ﬁeld. If the test current is parallel to a magnetic loop then there is no force exerted on the test wire. and its direction is again always at right angles to the test current.69) where I is a vector whose direction and magnitude are the same as those of the test current. Amp`re discovered that the force exerted on the test wire is directly propore tional to its length. Incidentally. θ = 0 corresponds to the case where the test current is parallel to the central current). and falls oﬀ like one over the perpendicular distance between the wires. If the current in the test wire (i. The variation of the force per unit length acting on a test wire with the strength of the central current and the perpendicular distance r to the central wire is summed 68 . so that it starts parallel to the central current and ends up pointing along a magnetic loop. If the test current is rotated in a single plane. whose direction is always parallel to the loops mapped out by a small compass. which is the same as a coulomb per second. If the test current is reversed then the force is upwards.out and also do not inﬂuence the outcome of the experiment. (3. He also made the following observations.
deﬁning cylindrical polar coordinates aligned along the axis of the central current. 2πr (3. we use Eq. so that 69 . Note that. (3. In the ﬁrst part. say.69) to calculate the force per unit length acting on a short current carrying wire located in the magnetic ﬁeld generated by the central current. In the second part.71) The concept of a magnetic ﬁeld allows the calculation of the force on a test wire to be conveniently split into two parts. We must assume that the conductor also contains stationary charges. and let n be the number density of mobile charges in the conductor. its magnitude is proportional to the central current and inversely proportional to the perpendicular distance from the wire. therefore. of charge −q and number density n. we have no reason to suppose that the magnetic ﬁeld has any real existence. electrons) through the conducting medium. Let us suppose that this is the case. (3. It is introduced merely to facilitate the calculation of the force exerted on the test wire by the central wire.6 The Lorentz force The ﬂow of an electric current down a conducting wire is ultimately due to the motion of electrically charged particles (in most cases. This ﬁeld circulates in the plane normal to the wire. This force is perpendicular to both the magnetic ﬁeld and the direction of the test current. The constant of proportionality µ0 is called the “permeability of free space” and takes the value µ0 = 4π × 10−7 N A−2 . we calculate the magnetic ﬁeld generated by the current ﬂowing in the central wire. that the force exerted on the wire when it is placed in a magnetic ﬁeld is really the resultant of the forces exerted on these moving charges. Thus. 3.up by saying that the magnetic ﬁeld strength is proportional to I and inversely proportional to r. It seems reasonable. at this stage. Suppose that the mobile charges each have charge q and velocity v. Let A be the (uniform) crosssectional area of the wire. we have Bθ = µ0 I .70) with Br = Bz = 0.
however. the force acting on an individual charge is f = q v ∧ B.75) according to the Lorentz force law. No magnetic force is exerted on a stationary charged particle. (3. (3. Thompson was investigating “cathode rays.74) This is called the “Lorentz force law” after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz who ﬁrst formulated it.69) the force per unit length acting on the wire is F = q nA v ∧ B. (3. (3. so all of the charges contained in a cylinder of crosssectional area A and length v ﬂow past a given point. Thompson in 1897. The magnitude of the electric current ﬂowing through the wire is simply the number of coulombs per second which ﬂow past a given point. This equation of motion was veriﬁed in a famous experiment carried out by the Cambridge physicist J.J.73) We can combine this with Eq. (3. Thus. The magnetic force. so the vector current is I = q nA v. In one second a mobile charge moves a distance v. is perpendicular to both the local magnetic ﬁeld and the particle’s direction of motion.” a then mysterious form of 70 .9) to give the force acting on a charge q moving with velocity v in an electric ﬁeld E and a magnetic ﬁeld B: f = q E + q v ∧ B. The direction of the current is the same as the direction of motion of the charges. In most conductors the mobile charges are electrons and the stationary charges are atomic nuclei. a unit length of the wire contains nA moving charges. So. The equation of motion of a free particle of charge q and mass m moving in electric and magnetic ﬁelds is m dv = q E + q v ∧ B.the net charge density in the wire is zero. the magnitude of the current is q nA v. dt (3. According to Eq.72) However. assuming that each charge is subject to an equal force from the magnetic ﬁeld (we have no reason to suppose otherwise). The electric force on a charged particle is parallel to the local electric ﬁeld.
radiation emitted by a heated metal element held at a large negative voltage (i. whilst British and French physicists suspected that they were. a stream of charged particles. as Thompson did. (3.77) and (3. that cathode rays are a stream of particles of mass m and charge q. Let us analyze Thompson’s experiment. The ﬁelds were perpendicular to the original trajectory of the rays and were also mutually perpendicular.78) and can be combined and rearranged to give the 71 .77) where the “time of ﬂight” t is replaced by l/v.e. In other words. It is clear from the equation of motion that d= q E l2 q E t2 = . Let us assume.76) that with a properly adjusted magnetic ﬁeld strength v= E . in reality. dt (3. Thompson started oﬀ his experiment by only turning on the electric ﬁeld in his apparatus and measuring the deﬂection d of the ray in the zdirection after it had traveled a distance l through the electric ﬁeld. B (3. (3. In Thompson’s experiment the cathode rays passed though a region of “crossed” electric and magnetic ﬁelds (still in vacuum). Eqs. It follows from Eq.. The equation of motion of the particles in the zdirection is d2 z m 2 = q (E − vB) .76) where v is the velocity of the particles in the xdirection. a cathode) with respect to another metal element (i. an anode) in an evacuated tube.e. German physicists held that cathode rays were a form of electromagnetic radiation. and are subject to a uniform electric ﬁeld E in the zdirection and a uniform magnetic ﬁeld B in the −ydirection.78) Thus. This formula is only valid if d l. The lack of deﬂection implies that the net force on the particles in the zdirection is zero. the electric and magnetic forces balance exactly. Thompson was able to demonstrate that the latter view was correct. m 2 m 2v 2 (3. Next. Thompson turned on the magnetic ﬁeld in his apparatus and adjusted it so that the cathode ray was no longer deﬂected. Suppose that the rays are originally traveling in the xdirection. which is assumed to be the case.
Assuming that mobile electric charges and the particles which make up cathode rays are one and the same thing. Thus.82) Note that a charged particle can gain (or lose) energy from an electric ﬁeld but not from a magnetic ﬁeld. in a circle) but the actual acceleration is performed by electric ﬁelds. in fact.1 × 10 −31 kg). Of course. A decade later in 1908 the American Robert Millikan performed his famous “oil drop” experiment and discovered that mobile electric charges are quantized in units of −1. Eq.79) Using this method Thompson inferred that cathode rays were made up of negatively charged particles (the sign of the charge is obvious from the direction of the deﬂection in the electric ﬁeld) with a charge to mass ratio of −1.81) (3.80) ].80) where v is the particle’s velocity.4 × 10 −31 kg. (3. 72 . does no work on the particle [see Eq. (3. It follows from the Lorentz force law. This is because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the particle’s direction of motion and. therefore. m l B (3. cathode rays are. (3.7 × 10 11 C/kg.charge to mass ratio of the particles in terms of measured quantities: q 2dE = 2 2. this is the mass of an electron (the modern value is 9. that the power input to a particle moving in electric and magnetic ﬁelds is P = q v · E.g.. in particle accelerators magnetic ﬁelds are often used to guide particle motion (e.74). streams of electrons which are emitted from a heated cathode and then accelerated because of the large voltage diﬀerence between the cathode and anode. Thompson’s and Millikan’s experiments imply that the mass of these particles is 9.6 × 10−19 C. Thus. and −1.6 × 10−19 C is the charge of an electron. If a particle is subject to a force f and moves a distance δr in a time interval δt then the work done on the particle by the force is δW = f · δr. The power input to the particle from the force ﬁeld is P = lim δW = f · v. δt→0 δt (3.
are completely superposable. Equation (3.83) 2πr This follows from Eq. whilst in reality there should be a short time delay. F F I1 B1 I2 B2 r Consider two parallel wires separated by a perpendicular distance r and carrying electric currents I1 and I2 . at least as long as the propagation time for a 73 . according to Eq.e.69). which is valid for continuous wires as well as short test wires. (3. if a ﬁeld B1 is generated by a current I1 ﬂowing through some circuit.. i. respectively. So.69). like electric ﬁelds. The force acting on the second wire is directed radially inwards towards the ﬁrst wire.83) is sometimes called “Amp`re’s law” and is clearly another exame ple of an “action at a distance” law. The magnetic ﬁeld strength at the second wire due to the current ﬂowing in the ﬁrst wire is B = µ 0 I1 /2πr. then when the currents I1 and I2 ﬂow through both circuits simultaneously the generated magnetic ﬁeld is B1 + B2 . so the force per unit length acting on the ﬁrst wire is equal and opposite to that acting on the second wire.3. and a ﬁeld B2 is generated by a current I2 ﬂowing through another circuit. This ﬁeld is orientated at right angles to the second wire. if the current in the ﬁrst wire is suddenly changed then the force on the second wire immediately adjusts. (3. The magnetic ﬁeld strength at the ﬁrst wire due to the current ﬂowing in the second wire is B = µ0 I2 /2πr. so the force per unit length exerted on the second wire is µ0 I 1 I 2 F = . This ﬁeld is orientated at right angles to the ﬁrst wire.7 Amp`re’s law e Magnetic ﬁelds. (3.
Amp`re’s law is not strictly correct. but. it is true in general. as will be demonstrated presently.light signal between the two wires. where r = ·B = µ0 I 2π x2 + y 2 . .8 Magnetic monopoles? Suppose that we have an inﬁnite straight wire carrying an electric current I. e However. it is impossible to invent any closed surface for which S B · dS = 0 with B given by Eq. Admittedly. In fact. If · B = 0 then B is a solenoidal vector ﬁeld. Let the wire be aligned along the zaxis. We saw in Section 3. we have only proved this for inﬁnite straight currents. but. as long as we restrict our investigations to steady currents it is perfectly adequate. can we ﬁnd such a surface? The short answer is.85) where use has been made of ∂r/∂x = x/r. try it yourselves!). in reality. Consider a cylindrical surface aligned with the wire. The magnetic ﬁeld is everywhere tangential to the outward surface element. (3.3 that the divergence of the electric ﬁeld appeared. This is certainly the case in Eq. (3. at ﬁrst sight. so this surface certainly has zero magnetic ﬂux coming out of it. instead. ﬁeld lines of B never begin or end. it was a deltafunction because the volume integral of · E was nonzero. 3.84) 2π r2 r2 in Cartesian coordinates.84) where the ﬁeld lines are a set of concentric circles centred 74 . This would certainly imply that · B is some sort of deltafunction. Does the same sort of thing happen for the divergence of the magnetic ﬁeld? Well. etc. This suggests that the divergence of a magnetic ﬁeld generated by steady electric currents really is zero. no. The magnetic ﬁeld generated by such a wire is written µ0 I −y x B= . Clearly. they form closed loops.84) (if you do not believe me. In other words. So. (3. if we could ﬁnd a closed surface S for which S B · dS = 0 then according to Gauss’ theorem V · B dV = 0 where V is the volume enclosed by S. The divergence of this ﬁeld is 2yx 2xy − 4 r4 r = 0.0 (3. to be zero.
It follows from Gauss’ theorem that if S B · dS = 0 then · B = 0. as can easily be checked by tracking the magnetic lines of force using a small compass. there are no magnetic monopoles in the universe.” Likewise.on the zaxis. so this would act like a positive “magnetic charge. In fact. At least. which is usually termed a “magnetic monopole. if there are any then they are all 75 . the ﬂux will be positive for an isolated south pole and negative for an isolated north pole. by snapping a bar magnet in two? A compass needle would always point towards an isolated north pole. that this is a true statement. If we track the magnetic ﬁeld lines with a small compass they all emanate from the south pole. we know that a conventional bar magnet has both a north and south magnetic pole (like the Earth). It is not clear. spread out. Thus. for instance.” then S B · dS = 0. or that · B = 0. In fact. and eventually reconverge on the north pole. N S Can we produce an isolated north or south magnetic pole.” It is clear from the diagram that if we take a closed surface S containing an isolated magnetic pole. a priori. so this would act like a negative “magnetic charge. It appears likely (but we cannot prove it with a compass) that the ﬁeld lines inside the magnet connect from the north to the south pole so as to form closed loops. it is quite possible to formulate electromagnetism so as to allow for magnetic monopoles. the statement that magnetic ﬁelds are solenoidal. a compass needle would always point away from an isolated south pole. What about magnetic ﬁelds generated by permanent magnets (the modern equivalent of loadstones)? Do they also always form closed loops? Well. as far as we know. is equivalent to the statement that there are no magnetic monopoles. However. the magnetic ﬁeld lines generated by any set of electric currents form closed loops.
N S hiding from us! We know that if we try to make a magnetic monopole by snapping a bar magnet in two then we just end up with two smaller bar magnets. We can continue this process down to the atomic level without ever producing a magnetic monopole.86) This. in fact.9 Amp`re’s other law e Consider. all steady magnetic ﬁelds in the universe are generated by circulating electric currents of some description. incidentally. 3. so this type of magnetism is not fundamentally diﬀerent to the magnetism generated by macroscopic currents. that is. again. In conclusion. an inﬁnite straight wire aligned along the zaxis and carrying a current I. (3. The ﬁeld generated by such a wire is written Bθ = µ0 I 2πr (3. In fact. it says that there are no such things as magnetic monopoles. they form closed loops and satisfy the ﬁeld equation · B = 0. this is also the case for time dependent ﬁelds (see later). Such ﬁelds are solenoidal. is the second of Maxwell’s equations. If we snap one of these smaller magnets in two then we end up with two even smaller bar magnets. Essentially.87) 76 . permanent magnetism is generated by electric currents circulating on the atomic scale. We have only proved that · B = 0 for steady magnetic ﬁelds but.
88) and (3. etc.88) However.89) imply that ∧ B · dS = µ0 I. ∂y ∂z ∂Bx ∂Bz − = 0. This integral is easy to perform because the magnetic ﬁeld is always parallel to the line element.in cylindrical polar coordinates. where use has been made of ∂r/∂x = x/r. Suppose that the radius of this loop is r. where S is any surface attached to the loop C. We have C B · dl = Bθ rdθ = µ0 I.84): ( ( ( ∧ B)x ∧ B)y ∧ B)z = = = ∂Bz ∂By − = 0. 77 (3. Let us evaluate S I C According to Eq.91) S . we know from Stokes’ theorem that S B · dl = S ∧ B · dS.89) ∧ B directly. Let us evaluate the line integral C B · dl. Consider a circular loop C in the xy plane which is centred on the wire. (3.90) 2x2 1 2y 2 1 − 4 + 2− 4 r2 r r r = 0. ∂z ∂x ∂By ∂Bx µ0 I − = ∂x ∂y 2π (3. (3. Equations (3. (3. We now have a problem.
However. We got around this problem by saying that ·E is a threedimensional deltafunction whose “spike” is coincident with the location of the charge. r = 0). we can integrate over all x and y without changing the result.93) S where the integration is performed over the region x2 + y 2 ≤ r.90).94) which is in agreement with Eq.88) ].. and we can write ˆ ∧ B = µ0 I δ(x)δ(y) z.91). Likewise. (3. whereas a twodimensional deltafunction is a singular line in space. A threedimensional deltafunction is a singular (but integrable) point in space.92) The above equation certainly gives ( ∧ B)x = ( ∧ B)y = 0. It is clear from an examination of Eqs. Suppose that we integrate over a plane surface S connected to the loop C. Recall that V · E dV = q/ 0 for a volume V containing a discrete charge q. You might again be wondering why we have gone to so much trouble to prove something using vector ﬁeld theory which can be demonstrated in one line via conventional analysis [see Eq.but we have just demonstrated that ∧ B = 0. we obtain ∞ S ∞ ∧ B · dS = µ0 I δ(x) dx −∞ −∞ δ(y) dy = µ0 I. of course. This problem is very reminiscent of the diﬃculty we had earlier with · E. Thus. the singularity coincides with the location of the current.90) that the only component of ∧ B which can be singular is the zcomponent. The surface element ˆ is dS = dx dy z. (3. since the only part of S which actually contributes to the surface integral is the bit which lies inﬁnitesimally close to the zaxis. Thus. (3. The answer. and that this can only be singular on the zaxis (i. but that ·E = 0 at a general point. is that the vector ﬁeld result is easily generalized whereas the conventional result is just a special 78 . (3.e. and ( ∧ B)z = 0 everywhere apart from the zaxis. (3. we can get around our present diﬃculty by saying that ∧ B is a twodimensional deltafunction. so ∧ B · dS = µ0 I δ(x)δ(y) dx dy (3. (3. in accordance with Eqs.
97) If we integrate the magnetic ﬁeld around some closed curve C. if C does not circulate the zaxis then an attached surface S does not intersect the zaxis and C B · dl is zero. yi ) in the xy plane. (3. However. provided the curve C circulates the zaxis. then Stokes’ theorem and the above equation imply that C B · dl = S ∧ B · dS = µ0 I. What now is the line integral of B around the loop? This is no longer a simple problem for conventional analysis.92).92) generalizes to N ∧ B = µ0 i=1 ˆ Ii δ(x − xi )δ(y − yi ) z. So.case. (3. For instance. Let us now consider N wires directed along the zaxis. we always get the same answer for the surface integral. because the magnetic ﬁeld is not parallel to the line element of the loop. as long as S actually intersects the zaxis it does not matter what shape the rest the surface is. with coordinates (x i . each carrying a current Ii in the positive zdirection. (3. The line integral C B · dl is µ0 I for a loop which circulates the zaxis in a clockwise direction (looking up the zaxis). However. suppose that we distort our simple circular loop C so that it is no longer circular or even lies in one plane. Note that the only part of S which contributes to the surface integral is an inﬁnitesimal region centered on the zaxis. and therefore any surface S attached to C intersects the zaxis. (3. according to Stokes’ theorem C B · dl = S ∧ B · dS. There is one more proviso. the line integral C B · dl is equal to µ0 I. Of course. 79 (3. (3.98) .95) with ∧ B given by Eq. This follows because in the latter case the zcomponent of the surface element dS is oppositely directed to the current ﬂow at the point where the surface intersects the wire.96) Thus. if the loop circulates in an anticlockwise direction then the integral is −µ0 I. which can have any shape and does not necessarily lie in one plane. namely C B · dl = S ∧ B · dS = µ0 I. It is fairly obvious that Eq.
Suppose we have a set of diﬀuse currents ﬂowing in the xdirection. (3. Thus. which implies that we are trying to squeeze a ﬁnite amount of current into an inﬁnitesimal region. 80 (3. Let us now generalize to the more realistic case of diﬀuse currents.97) is a ﬁeld equation describing how a set of zdirected current carrying wires generate a magnetic ﬁeld. (3. This accounts for the deltafunctions on the righthand side of the equation. The rectangle is assumed to be suﬃciently small that ( ∧ B)z does not vary appreciably across it.where I is the total current enclosed by the curve. y) and of dimensions dx and dy. Again. Equation (3. The current ﬂowing through a small rectangle in the yz plane. z) and of dimensions dy and dz. z) dy dz. if the curve circulates the ith wire in a clockwise direction (looking down the direction of current ﬂow) then the wire contributes Ii to the aggregate current I. centred on coordinates (y. is jz (x.98) this integral is equal to µ0 times the total zcurrent ﬂowing through the rectangle. where jx is the current density in the xdirection. if the curve circulates in an anticlockwise direction then the wire contributes −I i . Finally. if the curve does not circulate the wire at all then the wire contributes nothing to I. (3. we obtained deltafunctions in Section 3. jz is termed the current density in the zdirection. (3. According to Eq.3 because we were dealing with point charges. there is nothing special about the zaxis. y) dx dy. Suppose that the zcurrent ﬂowing through a small rectangle in the xy plane.100) Of course.100) to form a single vector ﬁeld equation which describes how electric currents generate magnetic ﬁelds: ∧ B = µ0 j. Let us integrate ( ∧ B)z over this rectangle. (3. Here.99) which implies that ( ∧ B)z = µ0 jz . On the other hand. We can combine these equations with Eq. Likewise. These wires have zerothickness. ( ∧ B)z dx dy = µ0 jz dx dy. is given by jx (y. It is fairly obvious that we can write ( ∧ B)x = µ0 jx . centred on coordinates (x.101) with a similar equation for diﬀuse currents ﬂowing along the yaxis.102) .
That is.103) is wrong. (3. and velocity v(r). The current density is given by j(r) = qnv and is obviously a proper vector ﬁeld (velocities are proper vectors since they are ultimately derived from displacements). and is independent of the surface which spans it. Suppose that we take two diﬀerent surfaces S1 and S2 . The electric current ﬂowing through a small area dS located at position r is j(r) · dS.103) C S In other words. (3. (3. If we form the line integral of B around some general closed curve C. Suppose that space is ﬁlled with particles of charge q. jz ) is the vector current density.98). This is the third Maxwell equation. when we work out the ﬂux of the current though C using two diﬀerent attached surfaces then we had better get the same answer. otherwise Eq. number density n(r). If the currents ﬂow in zerothickness wires then Amp`re’s e e law reduces to Eq. The ﬂux of the current density through C is evaluated by integrating j · dS over any surface S attached to C. We saw in S2 S1 C Section 2 that if the integral of a vector ﬁeld A over some surface attached to a loop depends only on the loop. This result is called Amp`re’s (other) law. 81 .102). the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around any closed loop C is equal to µ0 times the ﬂux of the current density through C. The charge density is given by ρ(r) = qn.where j = (jx . then we obtain B · dl = µ0 j · dS. making use of Stokes’ theorem and the ﬁeld equation (3. It is clear that if Amp`re’s law is to make any sense then the surface e integral S1 j · dS had better equal the integral S2 j · dS. jy .
Clearly.then this implies that · A = 0. Physically this implies that the net current ﬂowing through any closed surface S is zero. there is a term missing on the righthand side.. is a rather special class of currents. there will be a nonzero net ﬂux of electric current through the bounding surface S whilst this is happening. This..102). since this would imply a build up of charge in the volume V enclosed by S.104) We have shown that if Amp`re’s law is to make any sense then we need e · j = 0. in fact.102). this integral depends only on C and e is completely independent of S (i. This implies that · j = 0. and Amp`re’s law makes sense.e. = µ0 j. only twothirds of Maxwell’s third equation. In other words. so taking the divergence of Eq. 82 . we have only derived one and twothirds): ·B ∧B = 0. it is equal to the line integral of B around C. straight. steady currents.e. which depends on C but not on S). However.105b) We obtained these equations by looking at the ﬁelds generated by inﬁnitely long. of course. (3. as long as we restrict our investigation to stationary charges and steady currents then we expect · j = 0. We have now derived two ﬁeld equations involving magnetic ﬁelds (actually. We know that the divergence of a curl is automatically zero. In fact. Under these circumstances Amp`re’s e law collapses in a heap.105a) (3. For steady state situations (i. Suppose that some of the charges in a volume V decide to move outside V . (3. Up to now we have only considered stationary charges and steady currents. we can obtain this relation directly from the ﬁeld equation (3. This implies from Gauss’ theorem that · j = 0. The ﬂux of the current density through any loop C is is calculated by evaluating the integral S j · dS for any surface S which spans the loop. ∂/∂t = 0) this extra term can be neglected. the ﬁeld equation ∧ B = µ0 j is. According to Amp`re’s law. (3. Thus. e suppose that we now relax this restriction. We shall see later that we can rescue Amp`re’s law by e adding an extra term involving a time derivative to the righthand side of the ﬁeld equation (3. It is clear that if all charges are stationary and all currents are steady then there can be no net current ﬂowing through a closed surface S.102) we obtain · j = 0.
and ·B ∧B = 0. this is the case.We should now go back and repeat the process for general currents. Unfortunately. Field equations are a type of diﬀerential equation. they deal with the inﬁnitesimal diﬀerences in quantities between neighbouring points. 3. i. Let us assume that the above ﬁeld equations are valid for any set of steady currents. We can then. with relatively little eﬀort. Up to now we have only studied the electric and magnetic ﬁelds generated by stationary charges and steady currents. There are no other ﬁeld equations. Suppose that we have a scalar ﬁeld φ and a ﬁeld 83 . There is a better approach. thus proving that our assumption is correct. this demonstration is rather messy and extremely tedious. = µ0 j (3. There is a mathematical theorem which sums this up. what diﬀerential equation completely speciﬁes a scalar ﬁeld? This is easy. The question is. use these equations to generate the correct formula for the magnetic ﬁeld induced by a general set of steady currents. (3.107) = ρ 0 . In fact. More of this later. We have found that these ﬁelds are describable in terms of four ﬁeld equations: ·E ∧E for electric ﬁelds. In fact.e. It is called Helmholtz’s theorem after the German polymath Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz. This strongly suggests that if we know the divergence and the curl of a vector ﬁeld then we know everything there is to know about the ﬁeld. if we did this we would ﬁnd that the above ﬁeld equations still hold (provided that the currents are steady).. Let us start with scalar ﬁelds.10 Helmholtz’s theorem: A mathematical digression Let us now embark on a slight mathematical digression.106) = 0 for magnetic ﬁelds.
Suppose that we have a vector ﬁeld F . The question is. (3. For selfconsistency we need (3. but it remains to be proved. we only need two: one giving the divergence of the ﬁeld and one giving its curl.109) where Q is a general point. (3. How many diﬀerential equations do we need to completely specify this ﬁeld? Hopefully.108) where A(r) is a vector ﬁeld. (3.equation which tells us the gradient of this ﬁeld at all points: something like φ = A. This sounds plausible.111) since the divergence of a curl is automatically zero. 84 (3. Suppose that we have two ﬁeld equations: · F = D.110a) (3. Thus. do these two ﬁeld equations plus some suitable boundary conditions completely specify F ? Suppose that we write F =− U+ ∧ W. ∧ W .113) .112) In other words.110a). P say. Q Q φ(Q) = φ(P ) + P φ · dl = φ(P ) + P A · dl. ∧ F = C. Let us test this hypothesis. · C = 0. since the curl of a gradient is automatically zero. we are saying that a general ﬁeld F is the sum of a conservative ﬁeld.110b) where D is a scalar ﬁeld and C is a vector ﬁeld. The fact that ∧A = 0 means that A is a conservative ﬁeld which guarantees that the above equation gives a unique value for φ at a general point in space. We get 2 U = −D. and a solenoidal ﬁeld. U . (3. Let us start by taking the divergence of the above equation and making use of Eq. The above equation completely speciﬁes φ once we are given the value of the ﬁeld at a single point. Note that we need ∧ A = 0 for self consistency. (3.
(3.116) φ=− . we assume that the divergence of W is zero. (3. In fact. r − r  1 4π D(r ) 3 d r. is ρ(r ) 3 1 d r.112): ∧F = ∧ ∧W = ( · W) − 2 W =− 2 W. Wz = −Cz . We immediately notice that they all have exactly the same form. Eq. and Eq. then we can immediately write down the solutions to Eq.118) . Feynman: “the same equations have the same solutions.113) and Eqs.117) is the solution to Eq. (3.110b) we get 2 2 Wx = −Cx . they are all versions of Poisson’s equation. which we need to solve. r − r  where φ is the electrostatic potential and ρ is the charge density. (3.115). Let us look at these equations. Using Eq. Let us now take the curl of Eq. (3. We proved that the solution to this equation.117) φ(r) = 4π 0 r − r  (3. Note that the scalar ﬁeld U does not ﬁgure in this equation because the curl of a divergence is automatically zero. Wy = −Cy .115) 2 So. if the same equations have the same solutions. (3.115).114) Here. (3. 0 Well. This is another thing which remains to be proved. We get U (r) = and Wx (r) = 1 4π 85 Cx (r ) 3 d r.116).” Recall that earlier on we came across the following equation: ρ 2 (3. We can now make use of a principle made famous by Richard P. (3. with the boundary condition that φ goes to zero at inﬁnity. we have transformed our problem into four diﬀerential equations.Note that the vector ﬁeld W does not ﬁgure in this equation because the divergence of a curl is automatically zero. (3. (3. (3.113) and Eqs.
r − r  Cz (r ) 3 d r. if gf → 0 as x → ±∞ then we can neglect the ﬁrst term on the righthand side of the above equation and write ∂f g dx = − −∞ ∂x A simple generalization of this result yields g· f d3 r = − 86 f · g d3 r.120) · W = 0. r − r  C(r ) 3 d r.Wy (r) = Wz (r) = 1 4π 1 4π Cy (r ) 3 d r. (3. (3. r − r  (3. (3.125) .122) =− 1 4π (3.123) (3. (3. ∂x (3. Taking the divergence of Eq.120) and making use of the above relation. ∂x 1 r − r  d3 r . ∂/∂z ). we obtain ·W = Now 1 4π C(r ) · ∞ 1 r − r  d3 r = − 1 4π ∞ C(r ) · ∂g dx. ∂/∂y .124) ∂f ∞ g dx = [gf ]−∞ − −∞ ∂x f −∞ However.121) x −x ∂ x−x = =− 3 3 r − r  r − r  ∂x where is the operator (∂/∂x . Let us check to see if this is true.126) ∞ ∞ f −∞ ∂g dx. Note 1 r − r  . (3.119) The last three equations can be combined to form a single vector equation: W (r) = We assumed earlier that that ∂ 1 ∂x r − r  which implies that 1 r − r  =− 1 r − r  .
123). is our solution the only possible solution of Eqs.130) These solutions certainly satisfy Laplace’s equation and are wellbehaved at inﬁnity. its curl.110) and behaves sensibly at inﬁnity. If there are then we are in trouble. has a very nice property: its solutions are unique.e. we know that Eqs. which is the desired result. which are bounded at inﬁnity.128). This means that there is no vector ﬁeld which satisﬁes physical boundary equations at inﬁnity and has 87 . (3. That is. (3. y. We shall prove this later on in the course. we have already shown that · C = 0 from selfconsistency arguments. we can deduce that ·W = 1 4π ·C(r ) 3 d r r − r  (3.128) where i denotes x. or z. because we can take our solution and add to it an arbitrary amount of a vector ﬁeld with zero divergence and zero curl and thereby obtain another solution which also satisﬁes physical boundary conditions. In other words. Because the solutions to Laplace’s equations are unique.129) which is called Laplace’s equation. How about U = Wi = 0? (3. the equation 2 φ = 0. We have constructed a vector ﬁeld F which satisﬁes Eqs. Fortunately. (3. Well.128) which are bounded at inﬁnity. (3. However. provided C(r) is bounded as r → ∞.. if we can ﬁnd a solution to Laplace’s equation which satisﬁes the boundary conditions then we are guaranteed that this is the only solution.provided that gx f → 0 as r → ∞.127) from Eq.110) with sensible boundary conditions at inﬁnity? Another way of posing this question is to ask whether there are any solutions of 2 U = 0. F  → 0 as r → ∞. This would imply that our solution is not unique. let us invent some solutions to Eqs. it is not possible to unambiguously reconstruct a vector ﬁeld given its divergence. i. 2 Wi = 0.130) are the only solutions to Eqs. (3. But. (3. and physical boundary conditions. Thus. (3. so the above equation implies that · W = 0. (3. etc.
In other words. Thus.131) without knowing the ﬁrst thing about electromagnetism (other than the fact that it deals with two vector ﬁelds). We have just proved a number of very useful. according to Eq. Likewise.107) are of exactly this form. we can guess that the laws of electromagnetism can be written as four ﬁeld equations. a general vector ﬁeld can be written as the sum of a conservative ﬁeld and a solenoidal ﬁeld. we solved Eqs. if we come across a steady electric ﬁeld we know that if we trace the ﬁeld lines back we shall eventually ﬁnd a charge. we know that we can solve the ﬁeld equations without even knowing what the righthand sides look like. instead they have to be generated by stationary charges and steady currents. a steady magnetic ﬁeld implies that there is a steady current ﬂowing somewhere. All of these results 88 .) We also know that any solutions we ﬁnd are unique. (Actually. = something. After all. ·E ∧E ·B ∧B = something.118) blow up. We also know that there are only four ﬁeld equations.zero divergence and zero curl. (3.112). In other words. This is Helmholtz’s theorem. The third thing which we proved was that if the righthand sides of the above ﬁeld equations are all zero then the only physical solution is E = B = 0.110) is the only solution. and sensible boundary conditions at inﬁnity. its curl. This implies that steady electric and magnetic ﬁelds cannot generate themselves. the righthand sides have to go to zero at inﬁnity otherwise integrals like Eq. Eq. So. (3. Second. and also very important.110) for completely general righthand sides. we have unambiguously reconstructed the vector ﬁeld F given its divergence. since the above equations are suﬃcient to completely reconstruct both E and B. = something. there is only one possible steady electric and magnetic ﬁeld which can be generated by a given set of stationary charges and steady currents. First. our solution to Eqs. Thus. Thus. (3. Of course. = something.106) and (3. Furthermore. (3. we ought to be able to write electric and magnetic ﬁelds in this form. points. (3. a general vector ﬁeld which is zero at inﬁnity is completely speciﬁed once its divergence and its curl are given. (3.
89 .. for that matter) satisfy · B = 0. whenever we come across an irrotational vector ﬁeld in physics we can always write it as the gradient of some scalar ﬁeld. However.e. (3. This is clearly a useful thing to do since it enables us to replace a vector ﬁeld by a much simpler scalar ﬁeld.133) (3. prior to any investigation of electromagnetism. The quantity A is known as the magnetic vector potential. Eq.135). In fact. (3. (3. This is not an obviously useful thing to do.134) This immediately allows us to write B= ∧ A. from the general properties of ﬁelds in three dimensional space. This immediately allows us to write E = − φ. In fact.follow from vector ﬁeld theory.11 The magnetic vector potential Electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charges obey ∧ E = 0. however. since it only allows us to replace one vector ﬁeld by another. Nevertheless.135) since the divergence of a curl is automatically zero.135) is probably the single most useful equation we shall come across in this lecture course. We know from Helmholtz’s theorem that a vector ﬁeld is fully speciﬁed by its divergence and its curl. (3. 3. Magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady currents (and unsteady currents. The curl of the vector potential gives us the magnetic ﬁeld via Eq. i. whenever we come across a solenoidal vector ﬁeld in physics we can always write it as the curl of some other vector ﬁeld.132) since the curl of a gradient is automatically zero. The quantity φ in the above equation is known as the electric scalar potential. the divergence of A has no physical signiﬁcance. (3.
(3. (3. Taking the divergence of Eq.136) In other words. (3. Suppose that we have found some vector ﬁeld A whose curl gives the magnetic ﬁeld but whose divergence in nonzero.In fact. The transformations (3.137) This particular choice is known as the “Coulomb gauge.10).” leaves the electric ﬁeld invariant in Eq. according to Eq. can we ﬁnd a scalar ﬁeld ψ such that after we perform the gauge transformation (3.136) and (3. (3.138) It is obvious that we can always add a constant to φ so as to make it zero at inﬁnity. Recall that the electric scalar potential is undetermined to an arbitrary additive constant. (3. This proves that. We know that we can always ﬁnd a unique solution of this equation (see Section 3. The usual gauge for the scalar potential φ is such that φ → 0 at inﬁnity.139) The question is.133). Note that. (3. But it is not at all obvious that we can always perform a gauge transformation such as to make · A zero.136) we are left with · A = 0. (3. This is just another way of saying that we are free to choose · A.136) it is clear that we need to ﬁnd a function ψ which satisﬁes 2 ψ = v. we are completely free to choose · A to be whatever we like. we can always set the divergence of A equal to zero.137) are examples of what mathematicians call “gauge transformations. 90 . The most sensible choice is the one which makes our equations as simple as possible. Let · A = v(r).135).140) But this is just Poisson’s equation (again!). since the transformation φ→φ+c (3. the vector potential is undetermined to the gradient of a scalar ﬁeld. We are free to ﬁx the gauge to be whatever we like. The usual gauge for A is such that · A = 0. the magnetic ﬁeld is invariant under the transformation A→A− ψ.” The choice of a particular function ψ or a particular constant c is referred to as a choice of the gauge. in practice.
(3. = −µ0 jy . this is just Poisson’s equation three times over.135). We ﬁnd that ∧B = ∧ ∧A= ( · A) − 2 A=− 2 A. .145) But. = −µ0 jz .138). Let us take the curl of Eq. 0.144) Writing this in component form. The potential is not very well behaved on the zaxis. This would seem to suggest that there is a more direct relationship between the vector potential and the current than there is between the magnetic ﬁeld and the current.142) ﬁts the bill. The magnetic ﬁeld generated by such a wire is written B= µ0 I 2π −y x . We can combine the above relation with the ﬁeld equation (3.102) to give 2 A = −µ0 j.141) We wish to ﬁnd a vector potential A whose curl is equal to the above magnetic ﬁeld and whose divergence is zero. we obtain 2 2 2 Ax Ay Az = −µ0 jx .Let us consider again an inﬁnite straight wire directed along the zaxis and carrying a current I.143) where use has been made of the Coulomb gauge condition (3. It is not diﬃcult to see that A=− µ0 I 0. ln(x2 + y 2 ) 4π (3. but this is just because we are dealing with an inﬁnitely thin current. Note that the vector potential is parallel to the direction of the current. (3. We can immediately write the unique solutions to the above equations: Ax (r) = µ0 4π jx (r ) 3 d r. r − r  91 . (3. r2 r2 (3. (3.0 .
147) Of course.Ay (r) = Az (r) = µ0 4π µ0 4π jy (r ) 3 d r. r − r  ρ(r ) 3 d r. (3. (3.127) (with W → A and C → µ 0 j) and using the fact that · j = 0 for steady currents.12 The BiotSavart law which we recognize as Coulomb’s law written for a continuous charge distribution. r − r  (3. (3. they specify the magnetic vector and electric scalar potentials generated by a set of stationary charges.133) we can obtain an expression for the electric ﬁeld generated by stationary charges by taking minus the gradient of Eq. we have seen a equation like this before: φ(r) = 1 4π 0 (3. (3.107). we can prove that Eq. r − r 3 92 According to Eq.148) are the unique solutions (given the arbitrary choice of gauge) to the ﬁeld equations (3.148).147) satisﬁes the gauge condition · A = 0 by repeating the analysis of Eqs.146) jz (r ) 3 d r.147) and (3. This yields r−r 1 ρ(r ) E(r) = d3 r . Incidentally. (3.106) and (3.148) Equations (3. and a set of steady currents.135) we can obtain an equivalent expression for the magnetic ﬁeld generated by steady currents by taking the curl of Eq. This gives B(r) = µ0 4π j(r ) ∧ (r − r ) 3 d r. r − r  j(r ) 3 d r. According to Eq. of current density j(r). 3.149) 3 4π 0 r − r  (3. r − r  These solutions can be recombined to form a single vector solution A(r) = µ0 4π (3. of charge density ρ(r).147).150) . (3. (3.121)–(3.
105) are valid for general current distributions (recall that we derived them by studying 93 .where use has been made of the vector identity ∧ (φA) = φ ∧ A + φ ∧ A.e. (3. the study of magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady currents) what Coulomb’s law is to electrostatics (i.. r − r 3 (3..e. Let us reduce our distributed current to an idealized zero thickness wire.e. its direction and magnitude specify the direction and magnitude of the current) and dl is an element of length along the wire.151) can be combined to give B(r) = µ0 4π I(r ) ∧ (r − r ) dl. Equation (3. We can do this by writing j(r) d3 r = I(r) dl. it can be experimentally veriﬁed given a set of currents. the study of electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charges).150) is known as the “BiotSavart law” after the French physicists Jean Baptiste Biot and Felix Savart. This justiﬁes our earlier assumption that the ﬁeld equations (3.150) and (3. This current I( r ) dl rr / / measurement point law is to magnetostatics (i.. it completely speciﬁes the magnetic ﬁeld generated by a steady (but otherwise quite general) distributed current. a compass.152) which is the form in which the BiotSavart law is most usually written.151) where I is the vector current (i. Equations (3. a test wire. and a great deal of skill and patience. Furthermore.
r/ I θ ρ P (rr) / the wire at point P using the BiotSavart law. Consider (for the last time!) an inﬁnite. (3.e. Suppose that the perpendicular distance to the wire is ρ. = ρ tan θ. ρ dθ. they do not depend on the particular choice of gauge.the ﬁelds generated by inﬁnite. Note that both Coulomb’s law and the BiotSavart law are “gauge independent”. It is easily seen that ˆ I ∧ (r − r ) = Iρ θ. Let us reconstruct the magnetic ﬁeld generated by z I dl l r . i.153) Iρ ρ3 (cos θ)−3 94 ρ dθ cos2 θ . straight wire directed along the zaxis and carrying a current I. r − r  = cos θ Thus. dl = cos2 θ ρ .152) we have Bθ = µ0 4π π/2 −π/2 l > (3. straight wires). according to Eq..
we have come full circle in our investigation of magnetic ﬁelds. The physical signiﬁcance of this is that divergence and curl are the only rotationally invariant diﬀerential properties of a general vector ﬁeld. Since physics does not depend on the 95 . are suﬃcient to uniquely specify the electric and magnetic ﬁelds. 3. Examination of more complicated current distributions using this law invariably leads to lengthy. Note that the simple result (3.154) which gives the familiar result Bθ = µ0 I .e. According to Helmholtz’s theorem the above ﬁeld equations. and extremely unpleasant calculations. involved.156d) = 0. We have found that the electric ﬁelds generated by stationary charges and the magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady currents are describable in terms of four ﬁeld equations: ·E ∧E ·B ∧B = ρ 0 .= µ0 I 4πρ π/2 cos θ dθ = −π/2 µ0 I π/2 [sin θ]−π/2 .13 Electrostatics and magnetostatics We have now completed our theoretical investigation of electrostatics and magnetostatics.156a) (3. i. the only quantities which do not change when the axes are rotated. 4πρ (3. = µ0 j. However.156b) (3. plus the boundary conditions. before we start this let us brieﬂy review our progress so far. The boundary conditions are that the ﬁelds are zero at inﬁnity. = 0.155) So.155) can only be obtained from the BiotSavart law after some nontrivial algebra. (3. Our next task is to incorporate time variation into our analysis. assuming that the generating charges and currents are localized to some region in space. 2πρ (3..156c) (3.
156) can be deduced from Eqs. The ﬁeld equations (3.orientation of the axes (which is. 96 (3. C is a closed loop.157b) and (3.157d) are incomplete. = 0. The electric ﬁeld is clearly unchanged if we add a constant to the scalar potential: E→E as φ → φ + c. Likewise.157d) Here. the ﬁeld equation (3. Also. (3.158) Here. Equations (3. φ is the electric scalar potential and A is the magnetic vector potential.157c) S = 0.157) using Gauss’ theorem and Stokes’ theorem. each acquires an extra term on the righthand side in time dependent situations.157c) has no particular name and says that there are no such things as magnetic monopoles.157a) (3. = µ0 S C S B · dS B · dl C j · dS.160) .157a) is called Gauss’ law and says that the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld out of a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge. S is a closed surface enclosing a volume V . quite arbitrary) divergence and curl are the only quantities which can appear in ﬁeld equations which claim to describe physical phenomena. Equation (3. The ﬁeld equations can be integrated to give: E · dS E · dl = 1 0 V ρ dV. (3.159) (3.156b) is automatically satisﬁed if we write E = − φ. The ﬁeld equation (3. (3. and S is some surface attached to this loop.157d) is called Amp`re’s law and says that the line integral of the e magnetic ﬁeld around any closed loop is proportional to the ﬂux of the current through the loop.156c) is automatically satisﬁed if we write B= ∧ A. Equation (3. after all.157b) (3. (3. Equation (3.
and making use of the Coulomb gauge. are called gauge transformations. This sounds like an obvious.159). this means that there is only one electric and magnetic ﬁeld which is consistent with a given set of stationary charges and steady currents.164a) (3. (3.. we have a uniqueness theorem which tells us that our solution is the only possible solution. i. The latter convention is known as the Coulomb gauge. (3.e. which leave the E and B ﬁelds invariant. ﬂuid mechanics and plasma physics) where we also believe. (3.158) and the curl of Eq. Taking the divergence of Eq. But there are many areas of physics (for instance.156) can be reduced to Poisson’s equation written four times over: 2 2 (3.162) and · A = 0.164b) A = −µ0 j. that for a given set of boundary conditions the solution should be unique.The magnetic ﬁeld is similarly unchanged if we add the gradient of a scalar ﬁeld to the vector potential: B→B as A → A + ψ.163) φ = − ρ 0 . Physically. (3. We can always construct the solution to Poisson’s equation. The problem is that in most cases when we reduce the problem to a partial diﬀerential 97 . Note that 2 is clearly rotationally invariant since it is the divergence of a gradient. (3. Poisson’s equation is just about the simplest rotationally invariant partial differential equation it is possible to write. we ﬁnd that the four ﬁeld equations (3. we are free to choose the gauge.161) The above transformations. for physical reasons. almost trivial. This corresponds to the choice φ(r) → 0 as r → ∞. statement. and both divergence and gradient are rotationally invariant. Furthermore. given the boundary conditions. We are free to choose c and ψ to be whatever we like. The most sensible gauge is the one which make our equations as simple and symmetric as possible.
164a). So.167). This is the solution driven by a unit amplitude point source located at position vector r . (3. (3. Since any general source can be built up out of a weighted sum of point sources it follows that a general solution to Poisson’s equation can be built up out of a weighted superposition of point source solutions. According to Eqs. r ) v(r ) d3 r . r ) = δ(r − r ) (3. the scalar and vector potentials generated by a set of stationary charges and steady currents take the 98 . which means that its solutions are superposable. and (3.equation we end up with something far nastier than Poisson’s equation. Suppose that we can ﬁnd the solution to 2 G(r. Mathematically.168). (3. we are very fortunate indeed that in electrostatics and magnetostatics the problem boils down to solving a nice partial diﬀerential equation.166) which satisﬁes the boundary conditions. let alone that the solution is unique. we can write u(r) = G(r.167) The function G is called the Green’s function. The Green’s function for Poisson’s equation is 1 1 G(r. (3. we usually cannot even prove that it possess a solution for general boundary conditions. We can exploit this fact to construct a general solution to this equation.165). (3. this is hardly surprising given the deﬁnition of a Green’s function and Eq.164). we cannot solve this equation. In fact. (3. In general. r ) = − . Poisson’s equation 2 u=v (3. When you hear people say things like “electromagnetism is the best understood theory in physics” what they are really saying is that the partial diﬀerential equations which crop up in this theory are soluble and have nice properties.165) is linear.168) 4π r − r  Note that this Green’s function is proportional to the scalar potential of a point charge located at r .
r − r  (3. somewhat surprisingly.158) and (3.159) we obtain the fundamental force laws for electric and magnetic ﬁelds.14 Faraday’s law The history of mankind’s development of physics is really the history of the synthesis of ideas. This process has continued until today all physical phenomena can be described in terms of three fundamental forces: gravity. Coulomb’s law E(r) = and the BiotSavart law B(r) = µ0 4π j(r ) ∧ (r − r ) 3 d r.156)–(3. The question. 3.169a) (3. is by very little indeed.169b) j(r ) 3 d r. r − r 3 (3. both of these laws are examples of action at a distance laws and. and the 99 . (3. in Eqs. violate relativity. (3.171) we can already discern the basic outline of classical electromagnetism. Let us continue our investigation. 3 r − r  (3.170) Of course.form φ(r) = A(r) = 1 4π 0 µ0 4π ρ(r ) 3 d r. therefore. the electroweak force. r − r  Making use of Eqs. this is not a problem as long as we restrict ourselves to ﬁelds generated by time independent charge and current distributions. However. So. Physicists keep ﬁnding that apparently disparate phenomena can be understood as diﬀerent aspects of some more fundamental phenomenon. The answer. now. is how badly is this scheme we have just worked out going to be disrupted when we take time variation into account.171) 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) r−r d3 r .
essentially. not the ﬁnal) great synthesis took place in 1967 when Steve Weinberg and Abdus Salam showed that the electromagnetic force and the weak nuclear force (i. Unfortunately. took place in 1830 when Michael Faraday discovered that electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same thing.” The third great synthesis. The last (but. Of course. usually referred to as “electromagnetism. We measure a battery’s ability to push current down a wire in terms of its “voltage. The ﬁrst great synthesis of ideas in physics took place in 1666 when Issac Newton realised that the force which causes apples to fall downwards is the same as the force which maintains the planets in elliptical orbits around the Sun. which we shall discuss presently. The second great synthesis. What does voltage correspond to in physics? Well. This ﬁeld is directed from 100 . Weinberg’s work lies beyond the scope of this lecture course. which we are about to study in more detail. the above equation is a direct consequence of E = − φ..” by which we mean the voltage diﬀerence between its positive and negative terminals.172) ⊕ ⊕ where V is the battery voltage. took place in 1873 when James Clerk Maxwell demonstrated that light and electromagnetism are intimately related. One of the main goals of modern physics is to ﬁnd some way of combining these three forces so that all of physics can be described in terms of a single uniﬁed force. hopefully. the negative terminal. Prior to 1830 the only known way to make an electric current ﬂow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. This insight allows us to write V = φ(⊕) − φ( ) = − φ · dl = E · dl. This. the one which is responsible for β decays) can be combined to give the electroweak force.strong force. and dl is an element of length along the wire. Let us now consider Faraday’s experiments. Clearly. a voltage diﬀerence between two ends of a wire attached to a battery implies the presence of an electric ﬁeld which pushes charges through the wire. having put them in their proper historical context. volts are the units used to measure electric scalar potential. is the purpose of supersymmetry theories. ⊕ denotes the positive terminal. so when we talk about a 6V battery what we are really saying is that the diﬀerence in electric scalar potential between its positive and negative terminals is six volts. (3.e.
f.m. The fact that E is a conservative ﬁeld ensures that the voltage diﬀerence V is independent of the path of the wire. two diﬀerent wires attached to the same battery develop identical voltage diﬀerences. so it is electromotive (i.m. if the loop is denoted C and S is some surface attached 101 . This is just as well. The e. So. The e.f. if current ﬂows through a wire then there must be an electromotive force. This all seems to make sense.m. Clearly. “Electromotive force” is a bit of a misnomer. As expected. So. we are going to have to modify some of our ideas regarding electric ﬁelds! Faraday continued his experiments and found that another way of generating an electromotive force around a loop of wire is to keep the magnetic ﬁeld constant and move the loop. The electromotive force around such a loop is V = E · dl = 0.the positive terminal of the battery to the negative terminal and is.174) which immediately implies that E is not a conservative ﬁeld.. generated around a loop of wire in a magnetic ﬁeld is proportional to the rate of change of the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through the loop. such as to force electrons to ﬂow through the wire from the negative to the positive terminal. Michael Faraday is about to throw a spanner in our works! He discovered in 1830 that a changing magnetic ﬁeld can cause a current to ﬂow around a closed loop of wire (in the absence of a battery). Faraday was able to formulate a law which accounted for all of his experiments. it causes electrons to move). since E is a conservative ﬁeld then the electromotive force around a closed loop of wire is automatically zero and no current ﬂows around the wire. In fact. Eventually. therefore. but it is not a force. this means that a net positive current ﬂows from the positive to the negative terminal. (3. Well. V = E · dl = 0. So. In other words. (3.173) This is a direct consequence of the ﬁeld equation ∧ E = 0. for short. is certainly what causes current to ﬂow through a wire. The quantity V is usually called the electromotive force. and that ∧E = 0. it is a diﬀerence in electric scalar potential.e. Let us now consider a closed loop of wire (with no battery). However.f. or e.
From the diagram. it is clear that if the B B / I C magnetic ﬁeld B is increasing and the current I circulates clockwise (as seen from above) then it generates a ﬁeld B which opposes the increase in magnetic ﬂux through the loop. This process is know as “magnetic induction. this means that the universe is stable to small perturbations.f. which way around the loop does the induced e. According to Lenz’s law.175) where A is a constant of proportionality. According to Le Chatelier’s principle every change generates a reaction which tries to minimize the change. the current induced around a closed loop is always such that the magnetic ﬁeld it produces tries to counteract the change in magnetic ﬂux which generates the electromotive force.” S. Essentially.m. Thus.to the loop then Faraday’s experiments can be summed up by writing V = C E · dl = A ∂ ∂t S B · dS. The only thing we now have to decide is whether A = +1 or A = −1. The direction of the current is 102 .I. units have been carefully chosen so as to make A = 1 in the above equation. want to drive the current? We possess a general principle which allows us to decide questions like this. It is called Le Chatelier’s principle. the changing ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through the loop creates an electric ﬁeld directed around the loop. (3. in accordance with Lenz’s law. In other words. When this principle is applied to the special case of magnetic induction it is usually called Lenz’s law.
178) ∂t This is the ﬁnal Maxwell equation.f.f. It describes how a changing magnetic ﬁeld can generate. We obtain ∂B ∧E =− .179) This ensures that the magnetic ﬂux through a loop is a well deﬁned quantity.177) S for any closed surface S .176) E · dl = − ∂t S C Experimentally. so this implies that A = −1 in Eq.175).opposite to the sense of the current loop C (assuming that the ﬂux of B through the loop is positive). (3. irrespective of the position or shape of the loop. Since there is no preferred surface for a general noncoplanar loop. ∂t 103 (3. (3. The condition for the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld.177) yields the familiar ﬁeld equation · B = 0.176).e. S B · dS. Eq. (3. (3.176) is valid for any closed loop C. Faraday’s law.f. can be converted into a ﬁeld equation using Stokes’ theorem. Eq.178) yields ∂ ·B = 0. (3. and not on the nature of the surface itself.m. E·dl) generated in any wire loop. an electric ﬁeld. if the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through the loop depends on the surface upon which it is evaluated then Faraday’s law is going to predict diﬀerent e. It is reasonable to assume that the same e.m. to depend only on the loop C to which the surface S is attached. Faraday’s law takes the form ∂ B · dS.s for diﬀerent surfaces. is B · dS = 0. this would not make very much sense. Faraday’s law is found to correctly predict the e. (3.m. (i. no current would ﬂow in this case).180) (3. would be generated in the absence of the wire (of course.. (3. Thus. If Faraday’s law is to make any sense it must also be true for any surface S attached to the loop C. Clearly. Gauss’ theorem applied to Eq. or induce. Thus. . (3. The divergence of Eq.
in general. Let us start from the equation · B = 0. the ﬁeld equation (3.15 Electric scalar potential? We now have a problem. Does this mean that we have to abandon the concept of electric scalar potential? Fortunately. (3. However. 3. In other words. E = − φ) provided that ∧E = 0. and magnetic monopoles do not exist (as far as we are aware). ∂t (3. a conservative ﬁeld. We obtain ∧E =− ∂ ∧A . an extra term (involving the current of magnetic monopoles) must be added to the righthand side of Eq. We know how to generalize Maxwell’s equations to include both magnetic monopoles and currents of magnetic monopoles. no.178) actually demands that the divergence of the magnetic ﬁeld be constant in time for selfconsistency (this means that the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through a loop need not be a well deﬁned quantity as long as its time derivative is well deﬁned).e.Thus. However.178).182) into the ﬁeld equation (3.183) 104 . (3. (3. If magnetic monopoles were discovered tomorrow this would not cause physicists any problems. and ·B = 0.. In this generalized formalism Maxwell’s equations are completely symmetric with respect to electric and magnetic ﬁelds. (3. Hence. E is not. However. Since the magnetic ﬁeld is solenoidal we can write it as the curl of a vector potential: B= ∧ A. We can only write the electric ﬁeld in terms of a scalar potential (i. it cannot be predicted by any theory.178) in order to make it selfconsistent. The absence of magnetic monopoles is an observational fact. It is still possible to deﬁne a scalar potential which is physically meaningful.182) So. there is no problem with the vector potential in the presence of time varying ﬁelds. a constant nonsolenoidal magnetic ﬁeld can only be generated by magnetic monopoles.181) which is valid for both time varying and non time varying magnetic ﬁelds. Let us substitute Eq. we have just found that in the presence of a changing magnetic ﬁeld the curl of the electric ﬁeld is nonzero. · B = 0.
The most general transformation which leaves the E and B ﬁelds unchanged in Eqs. It is called gauge invariance.188) 105 . this prescription is not unique.16 Gauge transformations Electric and magnetic ﬁelds can be written in terms of scalar and vector potentials. ∂t A → A − ψ. We have come across this problem before. (3. The electric ﬁeld induced by time varying magnetic ﬁelds is nonconservative. and is described by the magnetic vector potential.187) However.185) ∂A . so let us write E+ or ∂A = − φ.187) is ∂ψ .186) ∂t This is a very nice equation! It tells us that the scalar potential φ only describes the conservative electric ﬁeld generated by electric charges.which can be written ∧ E+ ∂A ∂t = 0. ∂t (3. ∂t (3. (3. (3. φ → φ+ (3.184) We know that a curl free vector ﬁeld can always be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential. E =− φ− 3. There are many diﬀerent potentials which generate the same ﬁelds. ∂A . as follows: E B = − φ− = ∧ A.
. if ψ(r. We are free to choose the gauge so as to make our equations as simple as possible. (3.189) where c is a constant. E =− φ− ∂A . remains valid.11)..10). Now we are ﬁnding that when we split up the electric ﬁeld in this manner the two ﬁelds have diﬀerent physical origins: the conservative part of the ﬁeld emanates from electric charges whereas the solenoidal part is induced by magnetic ﬁelds.e. A → A− ψ.192) can be combined with the ﬁeld equation ·E = 106 ρ 0 (3. the most sensible gauge for the scalar potential is to make it go to zero at inﬁnity: φ(r) → 0 as r → ∞. Earlier on. (3. the ﬁrst term on the righthand side) is conservative and the part induced by magnetic ﬁelds (i. (3. t) → ψ(r) + c t then Eqs. the second term on the righthand side) is purely solenoidal. we proved mathematically that a general vector ﬁeld can be written as the sum of a conservative ﬁeld and a solenoidal ﬁeld (see Section 3.192) we ﬁnd that the part which is generated by charges (i. In fact. Equation (3. that it is always possible to transform away the divergence of a vector potential. (3.190) For steady ﬁelds we found that the optimum gauge for the vector potential was the so called Coulomb gauge: · A = 0.193) . The argument which we gave earlier (see Section 3.188) reduce to Eqs. As before. (3.e.This is clearly a generalization of the gauge transformation which we found earlier for static ﬁelds: φ → φ + c.189).191) We can still use this gauge for nonsteady ﬁelds. ∂t (3. One of the nice features of the Coulomb gauge is that when we write the electric ﬁeld.
(which remains valid for nonsteady ﬁelds) to give − 2 φ− ∂ ρ ·A = .192) ]. · A = 0. it can only be inferred from the electric ﬁeld. Equation (3. Thus.194) With the Coulomb gauge condition. However. This state of aﬀairs persists at least until suﬃcient time has elapsed for a light ray to travel from the distant charges to the region in question. (3. If the charge density changes suddenly at r then the potential at r responds immediately. 0 which is just Poisson’s equation. and not the scalar potential. It is exactly the same as our previous expression for the scalar potential generated by steady ﬁelds. t) 3 1 d r. Thus. very strongly. and that part which comes from the vector potential [see Eq. This suggests.196) is highly misleading.196) is a typical action at a distance law. (3. In the time dependent case there are two parts to the electric ﬁeld. How can these two statements be reconciled? The crucial point is that the scalar potential cannot be measured directly. that the Coulomb gauge is not 107 . which carries physically accessible information. we shall see later that the full time dependent Maxwell’s equations only allow information to propagate at the speed of light (i.195) φ=− . So. they do not violate relativity).e. It is clear that the apparent action at a distance nature of Eq. What actually happens is that the change in the part of the electric ﬁeld which comes from the scalar potential is balanced by an equal and opposite change in the part which comes from the vector potential. (3.196) φ(r. namely ρ(r . ∂t 0 (3. so that the overall electric ﬁeld remains unchanged. relativity is not violated since it is the electric ﬁeld. that part which comes from the scalar potential. if the scalar potential responds immediately to some distance rearrangement of charge density it does not necessarily follow that the electric ﬁeld also has an immediate response. t) = 4π 0 r − r  However.. the above expression reduces to ρ 2 (3. this apparently simple result is extremely deceptive. we can immediately write down an expression for the scalar potential generated by nonsteady ﬁelds.
(3. −∂A/∂t) is not purely solenoidal in the Lorentz gauge.11). The no magnetic monopole law was the ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through any closed surface is zero. Of course.194). Prior to 1864 the laws of electromagnetism were written in integral form. by analogy with earlier arguments (see Section 3. A more sensible choice is the so called “Lorentz gauge”: ∂φ . more of this later.e. this was only possible because he was able to take the experimental results of Faraday. as his starte ing point. etc. Amp`re. Note that the magnetically induced part of the electric ﬁeld (i. we obtain ∂2φ − 0 µ0 ∂t2 2 φ= ρ 0 .. (3. that it is always possible to make a gauge transformation. the fact that the part of the electric ﬁeld which we ascribe to magnetic induction changes when we change the gauge suggests that the separation of the ﬁeld into magnetically induced and charge induced components is not unique in the general time varying case (i. Between 1864 and 1873 James Clerk Maxwell achieved a similar breakthrough by pure thought.197) · A = − 0 µ0 ∂t It can be shown.e. (3. such that the above equation is satisﬁed.I. Incidentally.. it is a convention). at a given instance in time.17 The displacement current Michael Faraday revolutionized physics in 1830 by showing that electricity and magnetism were interrelated phenomena. units) the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld through a closed surface equals the total enclosed charge divided by 0 . He achieved this breakthrough by careful experimentation. Gauss’s law was (in S. Faraday’s law was the electromotive force generated around a closed loop equals 108 . But. However. 3. This is a slight disadvantage of the Lorentz gauge with respect to the Coulomb gauge. Thus.198) It turns out that this is a three dimensional wave equation in which information propagates at the speed of light.. this disadvantage is more than oﬀset by other advantages which will become apparent presently.the optimum gauge in the time dependent case. Substituting the Lorentz gauge condition into Eq.
minus the rate of change of the magnetic ﬂux through the loop. Finally, Amp`re’s e law was the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around a closed loop equals the total current ﬂowing through the loop times µ0 . Maxwell’s ﬁrst great achievement was to realize that these laws could be expressed as a set of partial diﬀerential equations. Of course, he wrote his equations out in component form because modern vector notation did not come into vogue until about the time of the First World War. In modern notation, Maxwell ﬁrst wrote ·E ·B ∧E ∧B = ρ
0
,
(3.199a) (3.199b) (3.199c) (3.199d)
= 0, = − ∂B , ∂t = µ0 j.
Maxwell’s second great achievement was to realize that these equations are wrong. We can see that there is something slightly unusual about Eqs. (3.199). They are very unfair to electric ﬁelds! After all, time varying magnetic ﬁelds can induce electric ﬁelds, but electric ﬁelds apparently cannot aﬀect magnetic ﬁelds in any way. However, there is a far more serious problem associated with the above equations, which we alluded to earlier on. Consider the integral form of the last Maxwell equation (i.e., Amp`re’s law) e B · dl = µ0 j · dS. (3.200)
C
S
This says that the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around a closed loop C is equal to µ0 times the ﬂux of the current density through the loop. The problem is that the ﬂux of the current density through a loop is not, in general, a well deﬁned quantity. In order for the ﬂux to be well deﬁned the integral of j · dS over some surface S attached to a loop C must depend on C but not on the details of S. This is only the case if · j = 0. (3.201) Unfortunately, the above condition is only satisﬁed for non time varying ﬁelds. 109
Why do we say that, in general, · j = 0? Well, consider the ﬂux of j over some closed surface S enclosing a volume V . This is clearly equivalent to the rate at which charge ﬂows through S. However, if charge is a conserved quantity (and we certainly believe that it is) then the rate at which charge ﬂows through S must equal the rate of decrease of the charge contained in volume V . Thus, j · dS = − ∂ ∂t ρ dV.
V
(3.202)
S
Making use of Gauss’ theorem, this yields ·j =− Thus, ∂ρ . ∂t (3.203)
· j = 0 is only true in a steady state (i.e., when ∂/∂t ≡ 0).
The problem with Amp`re’s law is well illustrated by the following very famous e example. Consider a long straight wire interrupted by a parallel plate capacitor. Suppose that C is some loop which circles the wire. In the non time dependent situation the capacitor acts like a break in the wire, so no current ﬂows, and no magnetic ﬁeld is generated. There is clearly no problem with Amp`re’s law in this e case. In the time dependent situation a transient current ﬂows in the wire as the capacitor charges up, or charges down, so a transient magnetic ﬁeld is generated. Thus, the line integral of the magnetic ﬁeld around C is (transiently) nonzero. According to Amp`re’s law, the ﬂux of the current through any surface attached e to C should also be (transiently) nonzero. Let us consider two such surfaces. The ﬁrst surface, S1 , intersects the wire. This surface causes us no problem since the ﬂux of j though the surface is clearly nonzero (because it intersects a current carrying wire). The second surface, S2 , passes between the plates of the capacitor and, therefore, does not intersect the wire at all. Clearly, the ﬂux of the current through this surface is zero. The current ﬂuxes through surfaces S 1 and S2 are obviously diﬀerent. However, both surfaces are attached to the same loop C, so the ﬂuxes should be the same according to Amp`re’s law. It would appear that e Amp`re’s law is about to disintegrate! However, we notice that although the e surface S2 does not intersect any electric current it does pass through a region of strong changing electric ﬁeld as it threads between the plates of the charging (or discharging) capacitor. Perhaps, if we add a term involving ∂E/∂t to the 110
righthand side of Eq. (3.199d) we can somehow ﬁx up Amp`re’s law? This is, e essentially, how Maxwell reasoned more than one hundred years ago. Let us try out this scheme. Suppose that we write ∧ B = µ0 j + λ ∂E ∂t (3.204)
instead of Eq. (3.199d). Here, λ is some constant. Does this resolve our problem? We want the ﬂux of the righthand side of the above equation through some loop C to be well deﬁned; i.e., it should only depend on C and not the particular surface S (which spans C) upon which it is evaluated. This is another way of saying that we want the divergence of the righthand side to be zero. In fact, we can see that this is necessary for self consistency since the divergence of the lefthand side is automatically zero. So, taking the divergence of Eq. (3.204) we obtain ∂ ·E . (3.205) 0 = µ0 · j + λ ∂t But, we know that ρ ·E = , (3.206)
0
so combining the previous two equations we arrive at µ0 ·j+ λ ∂ρ = 0. 0 ∂t (3.207)
Now, our charge conservation law (3.203) can be written ·j+ ∂ρ = 0. ∂t
0 µ0 .
(3.208) So, if we modify
The previous two equations are in agreement provided λ = the ﬁnal Maxwell equation such that it reads ∧ B = µ0 j +
0 µ0
∂E ∂t
(3.209)
then we ﬁnd that the divergence of the righthand side is zero as a consequence of charge conservation. The extra term is called the “displacement current” (this 111
name was invented by Maxwell). In summary, we have shown that although the ﬂux of the real current through a loop is not well deﬁned, if we form the sum of the real current and the displacement current then the ﬂux of this new quantity through a loop is well deﬁned. Of course, the displacement current is not a current at all. It is, in fact, associated with the generation of magnetic ﬁelds by time varying electric ﬁelds. Maxwell came up with this rather curious name because many of his ideas regarding electric and magnetic ﬁelds were completely wrong. For instance, Maxwell believed in the æther, and he thought that electric and magnetic ﬁelds were some sort of stresses in this medium. He also thought that the displacement current was associated with displacements of the æther (hence, the name). The reason that these misconceptions did not invalidate his equations is quite simple. Maxwell based his equations on the results of experiments, and he added in his extra term so as to make these equations mathematically self consistent. Both of these steps are valid irrespective of the existence or nonexistence of the æther. “But, hang on a minute,” you might say, “you can’t go around adding terms to laws of physics just because you feel like it! The ﬁeld equations (3.199) are derived directly from the results of famous nineteenth century experiments. If there is a new term involving the time derivative of the electric ﬁeld which needs to be added into these equations, how come there is no corresponding nineteenth century experiment which demonstrates this? We have Amp`re’s law which shows that e changing magnetic ﬁelds generate electric ﬁelds. Why is there no “Joe Blogg’s” law that says that changing electric ﬁelds generate magnetic ﬁelds?” This is a perfectly reasonable question. The answer is that the new term describes an eﬀect which is far too small to have been observed in nineteenth century experiments. Let us demonstrate this. First, we shall show that it is comparatively easy to detect the induction of an electric ﬁeld by a changing magnetic ﬁeld in a desktop laboratory experiment. The Earth’s magnetic ﬁeld is about 1 gauss (that is, 10 −4 tesla). Magnetic ﬁelds generated by electromagnets (which will ﬁt on a laboratory desktop) are typically about one hundred times bigger that this. Let us, therefore, consider a hypothetical experiment in which a 100 gauss magnetic ﬁeld is switched on suddenly. Suppose that the ﬁeld ramps up in one tenth of a second. What
112
211) Let us consider a loop 10 centimeters square. so we cannot really blame Faraday for not noticing electric induction in 1830. Thus. Suppose that our electric ﬁeld is generated by a parallel plate capacitor of spacing one centimeter which is charged up to 100 volts.01 tesla is the ﬁeld strength. “So. (3. Suppose. Let us now consider the electric induction of magnetic ﬁelds.1 seconds is the ramp time. What is the magnetic ﬁeld generated around this loop (we could try to measure this with a Hall probe). A = 0.” you might say. a perfectly fair question. Well.212) lB ∼ 0 µ0 t where l = 0. one millivolt is easily detectable.209) and neglecting the ﬁrst term on the righthand side. We ﬁnd that B ∼ 10−9 gauss. In fact. It follows that V ∼ 1 millivolt. This gives a ﬁeld of 10 4 volts per meter. The law of electric induction is obtained by integrating Eq.01 m2 is the area of the loop. (3. B · dl = 0 µ0 ∂ ∂t E · dS. B is the magnetic ﬁeld strength.1 meters is the dimensions of the loop. and t = 0.210) where B = 0. most handheld laboratory voltmeters are calibrated in millivolts. Very approximately we ﬁnd that El2 . (3. Modern technology is unable to detect such a small magnetic ﬁeld. and t = 0. It is clear that we would have no diﬃculty whatsoever detecting the magnetic induction of electric ﬁelds in a nineteenth century style laboratory experiment. t (3. “why did you bother mentioning this displacement current thing in the ﬁrst place if it is undetectable?” Again. further. that the capacitor is discharged in one tenth of a second.1 seconds is the decay time of the ﬁeld. 113 .electromotive force is generated in a 10 centimeter square loop of wire located in this ﬁeld? Amp`re’s law is written e V =− ∂ ∂t B · dS ∼ BA . E = 104 volts per meter is the electric ﬁeld. The answer is that the displacement current is detectable in some experiments.
∂t 0 µ0 (3. (3. amplify it so that its peak voltage is one hundred volts. Note that with the inclusion of the displacement current these equations treat electric and magnetic ﬁelds on an equal footing. We are now in a position to write out Maxwell’s equations in all their glory! We get ·E ·B ∧E ∧B = ρ 0 .209). On the other hand. But. So. The ﬁrst equation describes how electric ﬁelds are induced by charges. This is certainly detectable by modern technology. and the fourth equation describes the generation of magnetic ﬁelds by electric currents and the induction of magnetic ﬁelds by changing electric ﬁelds..213c) ∂E . (3.Suppose that we take an FM radio signal. Thus. ∂t (3.1 seconds to 10−9 seconds.213d) = µ0 j + These four partial diﬀerential equations constitute a complete description of the behaviour of electric and magnetic ﬁelds. there is a virtually infallible rule for deciding whether or not the displacement current can be neglected in Eq. In fact. i. and then apply it to the parallel plate capacitor in the previous hypothetical experiment. and vice versa. the induced magnetic ﬁeld is about 10−1 gauss.213b) = 0. of course. so t in the previous example changes from 0. The third equation describes the induction of electric ﬁelds by changing magnetic ﬁelds.209) was a vital step in his later realization that his equations allowed propagating wavelike solutions. If electromagnetic radiation is important then the displacement current must be included. it would seem that if the electric ﬁeld is oscillating fast then electric induction of magnetic ﬁelds is an observable eﬀect. The second equation says that there is no such thing as a magnetic charge. electric ﬁelds can induce magnetic ﬁelds. if electromagnetic radiation is unimportant then the displacement current can be safely neglected.213) sum up the 114 . (3. = − ∂B .213a) (3. a typical FM signal oscillates at 109 Hz. What size of magnetic ﬁeld would this generate? Well. Maxwell’s inclusion of the displacement current in Eq.e. more of this later. Equations (3. electromagnetic waves. Clearly. These solutions are.
Amp`re. (3.218) 115 . Maxwell also ﬁxed them up so that they made mathematical sense. they are e called Maxwell’s equations because James Clerk Maxwell was the ﬁrst to write them down (in component form).213a) to give ∂2φ − 0 µ0 ∂t2 2 φ= ρ 0 . (3.216) Let us now consider Eq.213b) and (3. (3. (3. (3. and Faraday very succinctly. (3.213d). Substitution of Eqs. ∂t The above equations can be combined with Eq.215b) ∂φ .214) into this formula yields ∧ or ∧A≡ ( · A) − 2 2 A = µ0 j − 0 µ0 ∂ ∂t φ − 0 µ0 ∂2A .214) This prescription is not unique. ∂t2 . (3.18 The potential formulation of Maxwell’s equations We have seen that Eqs. ∂A .experimental results of Coulomb. but we can make it unique by adopting the following conventions: φ(r) → 0 ·A = − 0 µ0 as r → ∞. ∂t (3.215a) (3.213c) are automatically satisﬁed if we write the electric and magnetic ﬁelds in terms of potentials: E B = − φ− = ∧ A. 3.217) ∂2A − 0 µ0 ∂t2 A = µ0 j − ·A+ 0 µ0 ∂φ ∂t (3.
= 0. we ﬁnd that Maxwell’s equations reduce to the following: 0 µ0 ∂2φ − ∂t2 2 φ = ρ 0 .220d) Note that these equations exhibit a nice symmetry between the electric and magnetic ﬁelds.19 Electromagnetic waves This is an appropriate point at which to demonstrate that Maxwell’s equations possess propagating wavelike solutions. in general. The above equation is.220c) (3. But. with no charges and no currents): ·E ·B ∧E ∧B = 0. 0 µ0 ∂t (3..e. = − = ∂B . ∂/∂t = 0) it reduces to Poisson’s equation.e. The easy way is to assume that the solutions are going 116 .219) ∂2A − 0 µ0 ∂t2 2 A = µ0 j. In steady state (i. (3.We can now see quite clearly where the Lorentz gauge condition (3. With the ∂/∂t terms included it becomes a slightly more complicated equation (in fact. 3. very complicated since it involves both the vector and scalar potentials. There is an easy way to show that the above equations possess wavelike solutions. a driven three dimensional wave equation). Thus. ∂t ∂E . Let us start from Maxwell’s equations in free space (i. if we adopt the Lorentz gauge then the last term on the righthand side becomes zero and the equation simpliﬁes considerably so that it only involves the vector potential.215b) comes from. This is the same equation written four times over.220a) (3..220b) (3. and a hard way. which we know how to solve.
and ω is the angular frequency. Speciﬁcally. It is more convenient to write E B = E0 e i(k·r−ωt) .221) Here. The solution to this equation is a set of equally spaced parallel planes (one plane for each possible value of n) whose normals lie in the direction of the wave vector k and which propagate in this direction with velocity ω (3.226) .224) v= .. The quantity φ is a phase diﬀerence between the electric and magnetic ﬁelds. The frequency in hertz is related to the angular frequency via ω = 2π f . The phase diﬀerence φ is absorbed into the constant vector B 0 by allowing it to become complex. The frequency is conventionally deﬁned to be positive.222) where by convention the physical solution is the real part of the above equations. E0 and B0 are constant vectors. = B0 e i(k·r−ωt) . t) = B0 cos (k · r − ωt + φ). the vector E0 is also complex. k is called the wavevector. (3.to be wavelike beforehand.223) where n is an integer and φ is some phase angle. B(r. let us search for plane wave solutions of the form: E(r. t) = E0 cos (k · r − ωt). (3. A wave maximum of the electric ﬁeld satisﬁes k · r = ωt + n 2π + φ. (3.e. 117 (3. the wavelength) is given by λ= 2π . In general. k The spacing between adjacent planes (i. k (3.225) Consider a general plane wave vector ﬁeld A = A0 e i(k·r−ωt) . B0 → B0 e i φ . Thus.
(3.222). (3.k v λ What is the divergence of A? This is easy to evaluate. 118 . The ﬁrst Maxwell equation (3. and Eq. (3.220a) reduces to i k · E0 = 0. the electric ﬁeld is perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the wave. This is easily generalized to ∧ A = i k ∧ A.228) (3.227). We have ·A = ∂Ay ∂Az ∂Ax + + = (A0x ikx + A0y iky + A0z ikz ) e i(k·r−ωt) ∂x ∂y ∂z (3. How about the curl of A? This is slightly more diﬃcult. Thus.227) = i k · A.230) using the assumed electric and magnetic ﬁelds (3. We have ( ∧ A)x = ∂Ay ∂Az − = (i ky Az − i kz Ay ) ∂y ∂z = i (k ∧ A)x .229) We can see that vector ﬁeld operations on a plane wave simplify to dot and cross products involving the wavevector.
Dotting equation (3. However.237) ω2 .Likewise. (3.224) that the wavevelocity c is related to the magnitude of the wavevector and the wave frequency via c = ω/k. (3.231) implying that the magnetic ﬁeld is also perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Clearly.232) yields k ∧ (k ∧ E0 ) = (k · E0 ) k − k 2 E0 = − 0 µ0 ω 2 E0 . ω (3.232) where use has been made of Eq.232) with B0 yields B0 · k ∧ E0 = ω B02 > 0. Thus. or k2 = 0 µ0 0 µ0 ωE0 .238) 119 .233) Thus. The third Maxwell equation gives i k ∧ E0 = i ωB0 . we obtain c= √ 1 0 µ0 . (3. (3. (3. and k are mutually perpendicular and form a righthanded set.235) (3. the vectors E0 .229). (3. the second Maxwell equation gives i k · B0 = 0. B0 . (3. where use has been made of Eq. the wavelike solutions of Maxwell’s equation are a type of transverse wave. (3. (3. we know from Eq.236) (3. Dotting this equation with E 0 yields E0 · B 0 = E0 · k ∧ E 0 = 0.234) Thus. the electric and magnetic ﬁelds are mutually perpendicular.230). The ﬁnal Maxwell equation gives i k ∧ B0 = −i Combining this with Eq.
batteries. to derive Eq.239) µ0 Let us use these values to ﬁnd the propagation velocity of “electromagnetic waves. propagating at some velocity c which is given by a combination of 0 and µ0 . thus. whose nature has been previously unknown. was the ﬁrst person to look for wavelike solutions of his equations and. Table 1 gives a brief guide to the electromagnetic spectrum. coils. The shortest wavelength blue light which is visible has λ = 0. was a form of electromagnetic radiation.998 × 108 m s−1 .238). = 4π × 10−7 N A−2 .4 microns (one micron is 10−6 meters). (3. Maxwell also made this connection back in the 1870’s. Visible light actually occupies a surprisingly narrow wavelength range. which apparently had nothing whatsoever to do with light. The wavelength of light was well known in the late nineteenth century from studies of diﬀraction through slits. This was a remarkable prediction.240) c= √ µ0 0 Of course. Maxwell concluded that visible light was a small part of a vast spectrum of previously undiscovered types of electromagnetic radiation. there is nothing in our analysis which suggests that this particular range of wavelengths is special. incidentally.76 microns. Maxwell. Electromagnetic waves can have any wavelength.We have found transverse wave solutions of the freespace Maxwell equations. etc. (3. Radio waves and 120 . (3. The longest wavelength red light which is visible has λ = 0. The modern values of 0 and µ0 are 0 = 8. we immediately recognize this as the velocity of light. After all.8542 × 10−12 C2 N−1 m−2 . Since Maxwell’s time virtually all of the nonvisible parts of the electromagnetic spectrum have been observed. He conjectured that light. However. The former is related to the force acting between electric charges and the latter to the force acting between electric currents. Maxwell was able to make another remarkable prediction. The constants 0 and µ0 are easily measurable. Both of these constants were fairly well known in Maxwell’s time. Electromagnetic waves are of particular importance because they are our only source of information regarding the universe around us. and currents. Maxwell’s equations were derived from the results of benchtop laboratory experiments involving charges.” We get 1 = 2.
Radiation Type Gamma Rays XRays Ultraviolet Visible Infrared Microwave TVFM Radio Wavelength Range (m) < 10−11 10−11 –10−9 10−9 –10−7 10−7 –10−6 10−6 –10−4 10−4 –10−1 10−1 –101 > 101 Table 1: The electromagnetic spectrum microwaves (which are comparatively hard to scatter) have provided much of our knowledge about the centre of our own galaxy. (3.232). visible radiation is still the mainstay of astronomy. Infrared radiation is useful for detecting protostars which are not yet hot enough to emit visible radiation.242) 121 .241) Thus. imply that B0 = E0 . Of course. and the relation c = ω/k. Equations (3. This is completely unobservable in visible light. Xray and γray astronomy usually concentrates on exotic objects in the Galaxy such as pulsars and supernova remnants. (3. c (3. Consider a free charge interacting with an electromagnetic wave.230). the spiral arms of our galaxy can only be mapped out using radio waves. Satellite based ultraviolet observations have yielded invaluable insights into the structure and distribution of distant galaxies. For the same reason. Finally. the magnetic ﬁeld associated with an electromagnetic wave is smaller in magnitude than the electric ﬁeld by a factor c. which is strongly scattered by interstellar gas and dust lying in the galactic plane. The force exerted on the charge is given by the Lorentz formula f = q (E + v ∧ B).
220c).243) So. Suppose that we take the curl of the fourth Maxwell equation. (3. felectric E0 c (3. However. the plane of oscillation) of the associated electric ﬁeld. we can only deﬁne two linearly independent vectors in a plane).246) We have found that electric and magnetic ﬁelds both satisfy equations of the form 1 ∂2 2 − 2 2 A=0 (3.247) c ∂t 122 .e. We obtain ∧ ∧B = ( · B) − 2 B=− 2 B= 0 µ0 ∂ ∧E .. The third Maxwell equation.220d). yields 2 · B = 0. A similar equation can obtained for the electric ﬁeld by taking the curl of Eq. B = 0.The ratio of the electric and magnetic forces is fmagnetic v B0 v ∼ ∼ . (3.238). For this reason. Eq. the electric ﬁeld can have any direction in the plane normal to k.220c): 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t E = 0. Let us now derive the velocity of light from Maxwell’s equation the hard way. (3.244) Here.245) 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t where use has been made of Eq. This implies that there are only two independent polarizations of an electromagnetic wave. once its direction of propagation is speciﬁed. (3. For a given wavevector k. (3. electromagnetic waves are usually characterized by their wavevector (which speciﬁes the direction of propagation and the wavelength) and the plane of polarization (i. in most terrestrial situations electromagnetic waves are an essentially electric phenomenon (as far as their interaction with matter goes). we have used the fact that Eq.. ∂t (3.e. (3. Clearly. there are only two independent directions in a plane (i. unless the charge is relativistic the electric force greatly exceeds the magnetic force.
= Fz ( k (r − ct) ). and Fz (φ) are onedimensional scalar functions.in free space. If we look along a direction which is perpendicular to k then k · r = 0 and there is no propagation. any arbitrary shaped pulse propagating in the direction of k with velocity c can be 123 . Thus. along the direction of k with velocity c. so that r = (k/k) r. = Fz (k · r − kc t). These pulses can be related to the sinusoidal F (r. t=0) x F (r. Thus. (3. t) x ct r > plane wave solutions which we found earlier by Fourier transformation. As is easily veriﬁed.249) The xcomponent of this solution is shown schematically below. Fy (φ).248) where Fx (φ). Looking along the direction of the wavevector. it clearly propagates in r with velocity c. = Fy (k · r − kc t). (3. without changing shape. we ﬁnd that Ax Ay Az = Fx ( k (r − ct) ). = Fy ( k (r − ct) ). the most general solution to this equation (with a positive frequency) is Ax Ay Az = Fx (k · r − kc t). the components of A are arbitrarily shaped pulses which propagate.
252) These are clearly driven wave equations.250) − 2 2 c ∂t is called the d’Alembertian. The potential u(r) satisﬁes the boundary condition u(r) → 0 as r → ∞. Thus. (3.253) provided that the source function is reasonably localized. 1 ∂2 (3.254) . This property 124 where v(r) is denoted the source function. Recall that the Laplacian is invariant under rotational transformation. The solutions to Poisson’s equation are superposable (because the equation is linear). It is the four dimensional equivalent of the Laplacian. = 0. The d’Alembertian is conventionally denoted 2 2 . 0 22 A = −µ0 j.20 Green’s functions Earlier on in this lecture course we had to solve Poisson’s equation 2 u = v.broken down into lots of sinusoidal oscillations propagating in the same direction with the same velocity. (3. 3. electromagnetic waves in free space satisfy the wave equations 2 The operator 22 E 22 B = 0. (3. Maxwell’s equations reduce to ρ 22 φ = − . (3.251) When written in terms of the vector and scalar potentials. Our next task is to ﬁnd the solutions to these equations. The d’Alembertian goes one better than this because it is both rotationally invariant and Lorentz invariant.
257) We found earlier that the Green’s function for Poisson’s equation is G(r.e. The Green’s function G(r. Thus. r ) v(r ) d3 r . (3. and falls oﬀ smoothly with increasing distance from the source.256) It follows from superposability that the potential generated by the source v(r) can be written as the weighted sum of point source driven potentials (i. It is spherically symmetric about the source.258) is perfectly sensible.255) Any source function v(r) can be represented as a weighted sum of point sources v(r) = δ(r − r ) v(r ) d3 r . 4π r − r  v(r ) 3 d r. t) is a time varying source function. (3.259) Note that the point source driven potential (3.253) is written u(r) = − 1 4π (3. 2 G(r.260) where v(r.is exploited in the Green’s function method of solving this equation.261) . r − r  (3. 125 (3. t) satisﬁes the boundary conditions u(r) → 0 as r → ∞ and t → ∞. r ) = δ(r − r ).. Green’s functions) u(r) = G(r. We now need to solve the wave equation 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t u = v. (3. generated by a unit amplitude point source located at r . which satisﬁes the appropriate boundary conditions. r ) = − 1 1 .258) It follows that the general solution to Eq. (3. (3. The potential u(r. r ) is the potential.
t ) = F (t − t − r − r /c) . t. (3.266) At a general point. Thus.262) Of course.265) where F (φ) is a general scalar function. r . t ) = δ(r − r )δ(t − t ). (3. how do we ﬁnd the Green’s function? Consider G(r. t. t ) v(r . t) = G(r. 2 − 1 ∂2 c2 ∂t2 G(r. t. We can easily show that x−x ∂r − r  = . r − r  (3. t) can be built up from a weighted sum of point impulses v(r. t ) is the potential generated by a point impulse located at position r and applied at time t . (3.263) It follows that the potential generated by v(r. t ) d3 r dt . (3. The Green’s function G(r. we basically have to show that G is a valid solution of the free space wave equation. r = r . r . so a Green’s function method of solution is again appropriate. t) can be written as the weighted sum of point impulse driven potentials u(r. (3.268) .264) So. ∂x r − r  126 (3. r .The solutions to Eq. (3. the above expression reduces to 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t G = 0. r . t) = δ(r − r )δ(t − t ) v(r . Let us try to prove the following theorem: 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t G = −4π F (t − t ) δ(r − r ). the Green’s function must satisfy the correct boundary conditions. A general source v(r.260) are superposable (since the equation is linear).267) So. t ) d3 r dt . t.
∂x2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2 r − r  c2 c ∂t 2 (3. c r − r 3 c2 (3. Thus. Thus. (3.269) that the dominant term on the lefthand side as r − r  → 0 is the ﬁrst one.270) giving − 1 ∂2 c2 ∂t2 G = 0. which is essentially F ∂ 2 (r − r −1 )/∂x2 . the region around r = r . as r − r  → 0 we ﬁnd that 1 1 ∂2 2 . 4π (3.269) 3(x − x )2 − r − r 2 r − r 4 where F (φ) = dF (φ)/dφ. 2 ∂2G ∂2G ∂2G F 1 ∂2G G= + + = = 2 2.271) which is the desired result. (3. Consider. Let us now make the special choice F (φ) = − 127 δ(φ) .275) . We can derive analogous equations for ∂ 2 G/∂y 2 and ∂ 2 G/∂z 2 . (3. according to Eqs.273) We conclude that 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t G = −4π F (t − t ) δ(r − r ). (3. (3. now. It is also clear that (1/c2 )(∂ 2 G/∂t2 ) is negligible compared to this term. It is clear from Eq.258) 2 1 r − r  = −4π δ(r − r ).It follows by simple diﬀerentiation that ∂2G ∂x2 = + 3(x − x )2 − r − r 2 r − r 5 F (x − x )2 F F + . (3.255) and (3.274) which is the desired result.272) − 2 2 G → F (t − t ) 2 c ∂t r − r  However.
3. t ) plus the time taken for a light signal to travel between points r and r. t ) = − (3. The amplitude of the wave is inversely proportional to the distance from the source. 1 δ(t − t − r − r /c) 4π r − r  is the Green’s function for the driven wave equation (3. Thus.278) t=t + c It is clear that this is the time the impulse was applied at position r (i. Because of the delta function our observer only measures a nonzero potential at one particular time r − r  .279) In other words.277) is the same as the steady state Green’s function (3. (3.277) describes a spherical wave which emanates from position r at time t and propagates at the speed of light.It follows from Eq.276) Thus.277) The time dependent Green’s function (3. What does this delta function do? Well. r . the Green’s function (3.e.274) that 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t G = δ(r − r )δ(t − t ). (3. t. G(r. consider an observer at point r. (3.21 Retarded potentials We are now in a position to solve Maxwell’s equations.258).280) . 0 2 A = −µ0 j. 128 (3. it is a sphere centred on r whose radius is the distance traveled by light in the time interval since the impulse was applied at position r .260). At time t > t the locus of all points at which the potential is nonzero is r − r  = c (t − t ). Recall that in steady state Maxwell’s equations reduce to ρ 2 φ = − .. (3. apart from the delta function appearing in the former.
(3. r − r  (3.264) we ﬁnd that φ(r. t ) 3 d r dt .284).284) j(r . r − r  ρ 0 The time dependent Maxwell equations reduce to 22 φ = − . (3.277). We can solve these equations using the time dependent Green’s function (3. t) = A(r. From Eq.284) are the same as the steady state solutions (3.281) j(r ) 3 d r. r − r  These are the general solutions to Maxwell’s equations! Note that the time dependent solutions (3. if we want to work out the potentials at position r and time t we have to perform integrals of the charge density and current density over all space (just like in the steady state situation). t) = 1 4π 0 µ0 4π ρ(r . when we calculate the contribution of charges and currents at position r to these integrals we do not use the values at time t.The solutions to these equations are easily found using the Green’s function for Poisson’s equation (3. What is this earlier time? It is simply the latest time at which a light signal emitted 129 .282) 22 A = −µ0 j. apart from the weird way in which time appears in the former.281). Using the well known property of delta functions. t − r − r /c) 3 d r r − r  (3. However. (3. t) = 1 4π 0 δ(t − t − r − r /c) ρ(r .258): φ(r) = A(r) = 1 4π 0 µ0 4π ρ(r ) 3 d r r − r  (3. instead we use the values at some earlier time t−r −r /c. According to Eqs. t − r − r /c) 3 d r. these equations reduce to φ(r.283) with a similar equation for A.
We are now in a position to understand electromagnetism at its most fundamental level. t ) d3 r dt .288) Each of these ephemeral charges and currents excites a spherical wave in the appropriate potential. (3. t ) d3 r dt . (3. t) = δ(r − r )δ(t − t ) ρ(r . and then disappear again.284) are called retarded potentials. (3. the charge density at r and t sends out a wave in the scalar potential: φ(r.from position r would be received at position r before time t.284) become φ(r) = A(r) = 1 4π 0 µ0 4π [ρ(r )] 3 d r.286) [j(r )] 3 d r. (3. Thus.287) Likewise.290) . 4π r − r  130 (3. r − r  (3. t) as built up out of a collection or series of currents which instantaneously appear and then disappear: j(r.e. 4π 0 r − r  (3. at some point r and some time t . t ) δ(t − t − r − r /c) . t ) δ(t − t − r − r /c) . r − r  The time dependence in the above equations is taken as read. the current density at r and t sends out a wave in the vector potential: A(r. t)] . this is written ρ(r.285) The square brackets denote retardation (i. Likewise. using the retarded time instead of the real time). t) = δ(r − r )δ(t − t ) j(r . t) = ρ(r . t) can thought of as built up out of a collection or series of charges which instantaneously come into existence. t) = µ0 j(r . This is called the retarded time. t − r − r /c) ≡ [A(r . Mathematically.289) Likewise.. It is often useful to adopt the following notation A(r . we can think of a current distribution j(r. Using this notation Eqs. A charge distribution ρ(r. the potentials (3.
(3.292) These two formulae look very similar indeed.These waves can be thought of as little messengers which inform other charges and currents about the charges and currents present at position r and time t . by the time they reach other charges and currents their message is a little out of date. The problem is that the information the charge receives from the rest of the universe is carried by our spherical waves. We can see that we have now escaped from the apparent action at a distance nature of Coulomb’s law and the BiotSavart law. Every charge and every current in the universe emits these spherical waves. The resultant scalar and vector potential ﬁelds are given by Eqs. So..291). and is always slightly out of date (because the waves travel at a ﬁnite speed). but there is an important diﬀerence.e.291) with the corresponding time dependent law φ(r) = 1 4π 0 (3. Electromagnetic information is carried by spherical waves in the vector and scalar potentials and. when astronomers look out to more and more distant galaxies in the universe they are also looking backwards in time. We can imagine (rather pictorially) that every charge in the universe is continuously performing the integral (3. the charge can calculate the ﬁelds and using the Lorentz force law it can then work out its equation of motion. After evaluating both potentials. i. (Similarly. However. we can turn these ﬁelds into electric and magnetic ﬁelds using Eqs. (3. the light we receive from the most distant observable galaxies was emitted when the universe was 131 . In fact. and is also performing a similar integral to ﬁnd the vector potential. the messengers travel at a ﬁnite speed. if we change the position of a charge then a distant charge can only respond after a time delay suﬃcient for a spherical wave to propagate from the former to the latter charge. therefore. We can then evaluate the force exerted on charges using the Lorentz formula. the speed of light. Thus.187). As the charge considers more and more distant charges or currents its information gets more and more out of date. Let us compare the steadystate law φ(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 3 d r r − r  [ρ(r )] 3 d r r − r  (3. Of course.286). travels at the velocity of light.
e.293) = 0 Now.294) = 0 This solution is shown pictorially above.292) says.) So. and therefore no vector potential is generated). it is easy to show that a current carrying wire eﬀectively emits an Amp`rian magnetic ﬁeld at the speed of light. t)] (i. (3. E = − φ (since there are no currents. so E(r) = q 4π r − r0 3 0 r − r0  for t1 ≤ t − r − r0 /c ≤ t2 otherwise. persists for a while. t) in its integral the electron uses the retarded charge density [ρ(r. and then disappears at time t2 . So.292). This is eﬀectively what Eq. the density evaluated at the retarded time).only about a third of its present age. (3. What is the electric ﬁeld generated by such a charge? Using Eq.. instead of incorporating the charge density ρ(r. (3. (3. we ﬁnd that φ(r) = q 4π 1 0 r − r0  for t1 ≤ t − r − r0 /c ≤ t2 otherwise. what does our electron do? It simply uses the most up to date information about distant charges and currents which it possesses. t < t1 t1< t < t 2 t > t2 Consider a thought experiment in which a charge q appears at position r 0 at time t1 . Likewise. e 132 . We can see that the charge eﬀectively emits a Coulomb electric ﬁeld which propagates radially away from the charge at the speed of light.
e. due to the other charges and currents in the universe.. in reality. but we have no way of knowing whether these ﬁelds persist when the charge or current is not present (i. they spray out the Coulomb ﬁeld in all directions at the speed of light. the forces are transmitted directly between charges and currents by some form of magic). In Coulomb’s law and the BiotSavart law it is not obvious that the electric and magnetic ﬁelds have any real existence. so the ﬁeld at a distant charge (or current) only responds to the change in position after a time delay suﬃcient for the ﬁeld to propagate between the two charges (or currents) at the speed of light. In the latter theories. leading inevitably to unphysical action at a distance type behaviour. 133 . Similarly. current carrying wires throw out magnetic ﬁeld loops at the speed of light. If we move a charge (or current) then ﬁeld lines emitted beforehand are not aﬀected. emits a Coulomb ﬁeld.. in terms of the local electric and magnetic ﬁelds. The only measurable quantities are the forces acting between charges and currents. In the time dependent theory charges act rather like water sprinklers. Consider the following thought experiment. it is patently obvious that electric and magnetic ﬁelds have a real existence in the time dependent theory. we could argue that electric and magnetic ﬁelds are just a convenient way of calculating forces but. Suppose that a charge q1 comes into existence for a period of time. i.We can now appreciate the essential diﬀerence between time dependent electromagnetism and the action at a distance laws of Coulomb and Biot & Savart. However. the ﬁeld lines act rather like rigid wires attached to charges (or circulating around currents). We can describe the force acting on a given charge or current. If the charges (or currents) move then so do the ﬁeld lines.e.
it cannot be ascribed to the ﬁrst charge because this charge no longer exists by the time the force is exerted. Let us now consider a moving charge. The force exerted on the second charge is only ascribable to the electric ﬁeld. In the latter case we call these “sonic booms. The electric ﬁeld clearly transmits energy and momentum between the two charges. In water. The locus of the outermost wave front is now a cone instead of a sphere. shock waves are produced by fast moving boats. We call these “bow waves. but is suﬃciently far from the ﬁrst charge that by the time the ﬁeld arrives the ﬁrst charge has already disappeared. The wave intensity on the cone is extremely large: this is a shock wave! The half angle θ of the shock wave cone is simply cos−1 (c/v). such as water or air.” In air. Anything which possesses energy and momentum is “real” in a physical sense. the wavefronts are more closely spaced in front of the charge than they are behind it.” Is there any such thing as an electromagnetic 134 . Suppose that a distant charge q 2 interacts with this ﬁeld. where waves travel at a ﬁnite speed c (say) it is possible to get a very interesting eﬀect if the wave source travels at some velocity v which exceeds the wave speed.and then disappears. suggesting that the electric ﬁeld in front is larger than the ﬁeld behind. Such a charge is continually emitting spherical waves in the scalar potential. Later on in this course we shall demonstrate that electric and magnetic ﬁelds conserve energy and momentum. In a medium. shock waves are produced by speeding bullets and supersonic jets. This is illustrated below. and the resulting wave front pattern is sketched below. Clearly.
θ vt
ct
shock wave? At ﬁrst sight, the answer to this question would appear to be, no. After all, electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light and no wave source (i.e., an electrically charged particle) can travel faster than this velocity. This is a rather disappointing conclusion. However, when an electromagnetic wave travels through matter a remarkable thing happens. The oscillating electric ﬁeld of the wave induces a slight separation of the positive and negative charges in the atoms which make up the material. We call separated positive and negative charges an electric dipole. Of course, the atomic dipoles oscillate in sympathy with the ﬁeld which induces them. However, an oscillating electric dipole radiates electromagnetic waves. Amazingly, when we add the original wave to these induced waves it is exactly as if the original wave propagates through the material in question at a velocity which is slower than the velocity of light in vacuum. Suppose, now, that we shoot a charged particle through the material faster than the slowed down velocity of electromagnetic waves. This is possible since the waves are traveling slower than the velocity of light in vacuum. In practice, the particle has to be traveling pretty close to the velocity of light in vacuum (i.e., it has to be relativistic), but modern particle accelerators produce copious amount of such particles. Now, we can get an electromagnetic shock wave. We expect an intense cone of emission, just like the bow wave produced by a fast ship. In fact, this type of radiation has been observed. It is called Cherenkov radiation, and it is very useful in high energy physics. Cherenkov radiation is typically produced by surrounding a particle accelerator with perspex blocks. Relativistic charged particles emanating from the accelerator pass through the perspex traveling faster
135
than the local velocity of light and therefore emit Cherenkov radiation. We know the velocity of light (c∗ , say) in perspex (this can be worked out from the refractive index), so if we can measure the half angle θ of the radiation cone emitted by each particle then we can evaluate the speed of the particle v via the geometric relation cos θ = c∗ /v.
3.22
Advanced potentials?
We have deﬁned the retarded time tr = t − r − r /c (3.295)
as the latest time at which a light signal emitted from position r would reach position r before time t. We have also shown that a solution to Maxwell’s equations can be written in terms of retarded potentials: φ(r, t) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r , tr ) 3 d r, r − r  (3.296)
etc. But, is this the most general solution? Suppose that we deﬁne the advanced time. ta = t + r − r /c. (3.297) This is the time a light signal emitted at time t from position r would reach position r . It turns out that we can also write a solution to Maxwell’s equations in terms of advanced potentials: φ(r, t) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r , ta ) 3 d r, r − r  (3.298)
etc. In fact, this is just as good a solution to Maxwell’s equation as the one involving retarded potentials. To get some idea what is going on let us examine the Green’s function corresponding to our retarded potential solution: φ(r, t) = ρ(r , t ) δ(t − t − r − r /c) , 4π 0 r − r  136 (3.299)
with a similar equation for the vector potential. This says that the charge density present at position r and time t emits a spherical wave in the scalar potential which propagates forwards in time. The Green’s function corresponding to our advanced potential solution is φ(r, t) = ρ(r , t ) δ(t − t + r − r /c) . 4π 0 r − r  (3.300)
This says that the charge density present at position r and time t emits a spherical wave in the scalar potential which propagates backwards in time. “But, hang on a minute,” you might say, “ everybody knows that electromagnetic waves can’t travel backwards in time. If they did then causality would be violated.” Well, you know that electromagnetic waves do not propagate backwards in time, I know that electromagnetic waves do not propagate backwards in time, but the question is do Maxwell’s equations know this? Consider the wave equation for the scalar potential: 1 ∂2 ρ 2 − 2 2 φ=− . (3.301) c ∂t 0 This equation is manifestly symmetric in time (i.e., it is invariant under the transformation t → −t). Thus, backward traveling waves are just as good a solution to this equation as forward traveling waves. The equation is also symmetric in space (i.e., it is invariant under the transformation x → −x). So, why do we adopt the Green’s function (3.299) which is symmetric in space (i.e., it is invariant under x → −x) but asymmetric in time (i.e., it is not invariant under t → −t)? Would it not be better to use the completely symmetric Green’s function φ(r, t) = ρ(r , t ) 1 4π 0 2 δ(t − t − r − r /c) δ(t − t + r − r /c) + r − r  r − r  ? (3.302)
In other words, a charge emits half of its waves running forwards in time (i.e., retarded waves) and the other half running backwards in time (i.e., advanced waves). This sounds completely crazy! However, in the 1940’s Richard P. Feynman and John A. Wheeler pointed out that under certain circumstances this prescription gives the right answer. Consider a charge interacting with “the rest of the universe,” where the “rest of the universe” denotes all of the distant charges in the universe and is, by implication, an awful long way away from our original 137
charge. Suppose that the “rest of the universe” is a perfect reﬂector of advanced waves and a perfect absorbed of retarded waves. The waves emitted by the charge can be written schematically as F = 1 1 (retarded) + (advanced). 2 2 (3.303)
The response of the rest of the universe is written R= 1 1 (retarded) − (advanced). 2 2 (3.304)
This is illustrated in the spacetime diagram below. Here, A and R denote the
charge rest of universe
time A a
aa R
space
advanced and retarded waves emitted by the charge, respectively. The advanced wave travels to “the rest of the universe” and is reﬂected; i.e., the distant charges oscillate in response to the advanced wave and emit a retarded wave a, as shown. The retarded wave a is spherical wave which converges on the original charge, passes through the charge, and then diverges again. The divergent wave is denoted aa. Note that a looks like a negative advanced wave emitted by the charge, whereas aa looks like a positive retarded wave emitted by the charge. This is 138
and a general retarded quantity is written [F (r. charges appear to emit only retarded waves. the distant charges in the universe absorb retarded waves and reﬂect advanced waves. i. so at present the status of this model is that it is “an interesting idea” but it is still not fully accepted into the canon of physics. hence. 3. It is quite plausible that the state of the universe (and. in this model we have sidestepped the problem of a time asymmetric Green’s function by adopting time asymmetric boundary conditions to the universe. ∂t (3.304) says.” or whatever) and the reﬂection takes place at the beginning of the universe (i. Thus. The retarded time becomes tr = t − R/c.. t)] ≡ F (r. at the “big crunch.e.” If we add the waves emitted by the charge to the response of “the rest of the universe” we obtain F = F + R = (retarded).307) where R = r − r .. (3. (3. which agrees with our everyday experience. This is possible because the absorption takes place at the end of the universe (i. The retarded waves R and aa are absorbed by “the rest of the universe. These diﬃculties have yet to be resolved. ∂A . Let us now construct the associated electric and magnetic ﬁelds using E B It is helpful to write R=r−r .e. tr ).306) 139 .e. It should be pointed out that the FeynmanWheeler model runs into trouble when one tries to combine electromagnetism with quantum mechanics.23 Retarded ﬁelds We know the solution to Maxwell’s equations in terms of retarded potentials. at the “big bang”).essentially what Eq.. its interaction with electromagnetic waves) is completely diﬀerent at these two times. Clearly. (3.305) Thus. we can write the retarded = − φ− = ∧ A.
(3. It is easily seen that φ = 1 4π 0 1 4π 0 [ρ] (R−1 ) + [∂ρ/∂t] R tr dV . R [j] dV . and (3. (3.312) which is the time dependent generalization of Coulomb’s law.308) = − [ρ] [∂ρ/∂t] R− R R3 cR2 where use has been made of R= Likewise. and B= µ0 4π [j] ∧ R [∂j/∂t] ∧ R + R3 cR2 140 dV . R (R−1 ) = − R . R (3.313) . R3 tr = − R .309).potential solutions of Maxwell’s equations in the especially compact form: φ = A = where dV ≡ d3 r .310) = − R ∧ [j] R ∧ [∂j/∂t] + R3 cR2 Equations (3. (3.311) R .306).311) can be combined to give E= 1 4π 0 [ρ] R ∂ρ + R3 ∂t R [∂j/∂t] − cR2 c2 R dV . cR (3.309) 1 4π 0 µ0 4π [ρ] dV . dV (3. dV (3. ∧A = µ0 4π µ0 4π (R−1 ) ∧ [j] + tr ∧ [∂j/∂t] R dV .
317b) the ﬁrst term on the righthand side is the BiotSavart law and the second term is the correction due to retardation eﬀects. ∂t c 2 ∂t2 c2 Expansion of the retarded quantities in the near ﬁeld region yields [ρ] ρ− E B 1 4π 0 µ0 4π ∂j/∂t ρ R 1 ∂2ρ R − − 2 + ··· R3 2 ∂t2 c2 R c R j ∧ R 1 (∂ 2 j/∂t2 ) ∧ R − + ··· R3 2 c2 R dV . Let the currents in the circuit change on a typical timescale of one tenth of a second. In the near ﬁeld region R t − tr  = t0 R0 1. In Eq. and the “far ﬁeld” region R R0 . and the third term corresponds to Faraday induction.317a) the ﬁrst term on the righthand side corresponds to Coulomb’s law. This allows us to expand retarded quantities in a Taylor series. In Eq.312) and (3. (3.315) ∂ρ R 1 ∂ 2 ρ R2 + + ···. We might suppose.which is the time dependent generalization of the BiotSavart law. Suppose that the typical variation timescale of our charges and currents is t0 .313) in two asymptotic limits: the “near ﬁeld” region R R0 . from looking at Eqs. (3. Thus. circuit sitting on a laboratory benchtop. that we have a d. The lengthscale of the experiment is 141 .316) (3. Suppose. so R0 ∼ 30. We can evaluate Eqs. that the corrections should be of order R/R0 . Let us deﬁne R0 = c t0 which is the distance a light ray travels in time t0 . In this time light can travel about 3 × 107 meters. (3.317a) (3. however all of the order R/R0 terms canceled out in the previous expansion.c.313). 000 kilometers. (3. ∂t 2 ∂t2 (3. then. [ρ] giving ∂ρ 1 ∂2ρ ρ+ (tr − t) + (tr − t) + · · · . Note that the retardation corrections are only of order (R/R0 )2 .314) so the diﬀerence between retarded time and standard time is relatively small. (3.317b) dV . the second term is the correction due to retardation eﬀects. (3.312) and (3.
about one meter.318c) R2 Here.319) whereas the magnetic ﬁeld is given by B Note that 1 4π 0 ∂j⊥ /∂t dV c3 R∗2 E = c.313) are dominated by −1 the terms which vary like R . the electric ﬁeld reduces to E − 1 4π 0 ∂j⊥ /∂t dV c 2 R∗ . It is clear that we are fairly safe just using Coulomb’s law.320) ρ(r.318b) µ0 4π [∂j⊥ /∂t] ∧ R dV . Faraday’s law. (3. c2 R (3. Suppose that our charges and currents are localized to some region in the vicinity of r = r∗ . t − R∗ /c). Thus. use has been made of [∂ρ/∂t] = −[ · j] and [ · j] = −[∂j/∂t] · R/cR + O(1/R2 ). so R = 1 meter. In the far ﬁeld region. the retardation corrections are of order (3 × 107 )−2 ∼ 10−15 . Suppose that the extent of the current and charge containing region is much less than R ∗ . Let R∗ = r − r∗ . cR2 (j · R) R. (3.312) and (3. Thus. and the BiotSavart law to analyze the ﬁelds generated by this type of circuit. Eqs. It follows that retarded quantities can be written j⊥ = j − [ρ(r. with R∗ = r − r∗ . B 142 ∧ R∗ .321) (3. (3. t)] etc. (3. R R0 .322) . so E B where − 1 4π 0 [∂j⊥ /∂t] dV . (3.318a) (3.
This behaviour should be contrasted with that of Coulomb or BiotSavart ﬁelds which fall oﬀ like the inverse square of the distance from the source. c2 ∂t (3. We conclude that accelerating electric charges emit electromagnetic waves. If wave ﬁelds obeyed an inverse square law then no appreciable radiation would reach us from the rest of the universe. Let us now summarize what we have learned so far.321). (3. The wave ﬁelds. = − ∂B .320) and (3.324b) = 0. Note that the wave is driven by time varying electric currents. ∂t 1 ∂E .and E · B = 0. charges moving with a constant velocity constitute a steady current. Only in the intermediate region. etc.24 Summary This marks the end of our theoretical investigation of Maxwell’s equations. Now. electric and magnetic ﬁelds look simple in the near ﬁeld region (they are just Coulomb ﬁelds. fall oﬀ like the inverse of the distance from the wave source. 3.323) describe an electromagnetic wave propagating radially away from the charge and current containing region.) and also in the far ﬁeld region (they are just electromagnetic waves). The fact that wave ﬁelds attenuate fairly gently with increasing distance from the source is what makes astronomy possible.324d) = µ0 j + 143 .323) This conﬁguration of electric and magnetic ﬁelds is characteristic of an electromagnetic wave (see Section 3. Eqs. (3. The ﬁeld equations which govern electric and magnetic ﬁelds are written: ·E ·B ∧E ∧B = ρ 0 . do things start getting really complicated (so we do not look in this region!).324c) (3. Thus. (3. so a nonsteady current is associated with accelerating charges. In conclusion. (3.19).324a) (3. R ∼ R 0 .322) and (3.
324a) and (3.325a) (3.325d) = µ0 C j · dS + Equations (3. ∂A .328) .324c) are automatically satisﬁed by writing E B = − φ− = ∧ A.324b) and (3.These equations can be integrated to give E · dS B · dS E · dl B · dl = 1 0 V ρ dV. (3.325c) E · dS. (3. (3.326a) (3.330) .324d) reduce to 22 φ = − ρ 0 (3.326b) This prescription is not unique (there are many choices of φ and A which generate the same ﬁelds) but we can make it unique by adopting the following conventions: φ(r) → 0 as r → ∞.329b) 22 A = −µ0 j These are driven wave equations of the general form 2 u≡ 2 2 1 ∂2 − 2 2 c ∂t 144 u = v.327) and 1 ∂φ + · A = 0. (3.325b) S = 0. (3. c2 ∂t Equations (3.329a) (3. 1 ∂ c2 ∂t S (3. = − ∂ ∂t S S C S B · dS. ∂t (3.
t) = (3. and retarded electromagnetic ﬁelds [Eqs. Let us now consider the applications of this theory. t) = 1 4π 0 µ0 4π [ρ] R ∂ρ + R3 ∂t [∂j/∂t] R − cR2 c2 R dV .331) Thus.333) constitute the complete theory of classical electromagnetism. with [A] ≡ A(r . (3.333a) (3. 4π r − r  1 4π 0 µ0 4π [ρ] dV .329) are φ(r. t) = B(r. and dV = d3 r . integrated ﬁeld equations [Eqs. We can express the same information in terms of ﬁeld equations [Eqs. t ) = − 1 δ(t − t − r − r /c) . dV . retarded electromagnetic potentials [Eqs. 145 .The Green’s function for this equation which satisﬁes the boundary conditions and is consistent with causality is G(r. t − R/c).333b) [j] ∧ R [∂j/∂t] ∧ R + R3 cR2 Equations (3.324) ].332) ]. the solutions to Eqs.332a) (3. These solutions can be combined with Eqs. (3. (3.332b) where R = r − r .326) to give E(r. r .333) ].324)–(3. t) = A(r. (3. (3. (3. R (3. R [j] dV . t.325) ]. (3.
since there is no electric ﬁeld to ﬁght against. (4.1 Applications of Maxwell’s equations Electrostatic energy Consider a collection of N static point charges qi located at position vectors ri (where i runs from 1 to N ). What is the electrostatic energy stored in such a collection? Another way of asking this is.4) φ(r) = 4π 0 r − r  Let us build up our collection of charges one by one.4 4. (4. We also know that the electric force on a charge q is written f = q E. how much work would we have to do in order to assemble the charges. (4. In order to bring the second charge into 146 . It takes no work to bring the ﬁrst charge from inﬁnity.2) (4. Recall that the scalar potential generated by a point charge q at position r is q 1 .1) The work we would have to do against electrical forces in order to move the charge from point P to point Q is simply Q Q Q W =− P f · dl = −q P E · dl = q P φ · dl = q [φ(Q) − φ(P )] . Let us clamp this charge in position at r1 .3) The negative sign in the above expression comes about because we would have to exert a force −f on the charge in order to counteract the force exerted by the electric ﬁeld. starting from an initial state in which they are all at rest and also very widely separated? We know that a static electric ﬁeld is conservative and can consequently be written in terms of a scalar potential: E = − φ.
e. (4. Thus.8) i=1 j>i The restriction that j must be greater than i makes the above summation rather messy. this work is given by W2 = 1 q1 q2 . 4π 0 r1 − r2  (4. Since electric ﬁelds and scalar potentials are superposable the work done whilst moving the third charge from inﬁnity to r3 is simply the sum of the work done against the electric ﬁelds generated by charges 1 and 2 taken in isolation: W3 = 1 4π 0 q1 q3 q2 q3 + r1 − r3  r2 − r3  .6) Thus.4). If we were to sum without restriction (other than j = i) then each pair of charges would be counted twice. (4.position at r2 we have to do work against the electric ﬁeld generated by the ﬁrst charge. Alternatively. this is the kinetic energy which would be released if the collection 147 .3) and Eqs.7) This result can easily be generalized to N charges: 1 W = 4π 0 qi qj . (4. (4.9) This is the potential energy (i. the total work done in assembling the three charges is given by W = 1 4π 0 q1 q2 q1 q3 q2 q3 + + r1 − r2  r1 − r3  r2 − r3  N N . ri − rj  (4. It is convenient to do just this and then to divide the result by two. ri − rj  (4. According to Eqs. 1 1 W = 2 4π 0 N N i=1 j=1 j=i qi qj . the diﬀerence between the total energy and the kinetic energy) of a collection of charges.5) Let us now bring the third charge into position. We can think of this as the work needed to bring static charges from inﬁnity and assemble them in the required formation..
(4. It is tempting to write 1 ρ φ d3 r.11) is the scalar potential experienced by the i th charge due to the other charges in the distribution. Let us try this out.were dissolved and the charges returned to inﬁnity.13) is the familiar scalar potential generated by a continuous charge distribution. where φ(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 3 d r r − r  (4. Let us now consider the potential energy of a continuous charge distribution. But where is this potential energy stored? Let us investigate further.15) Vector ﬁeld theory yields the standard result · (E φ) = φ 148 ·E + E · φ.10) N j=1 j=i qj ri − rj  (4.16) . (4. We know from Poisson’s equation that ρ= so Eq. (4.9) can be written 1 W = 2 where 1 φi = 4π 0 N qi φ i . (4. Equation (4. (4.10) and (4. i=1 (4.14) 2 φ ·E d3 r.12) can be written W = 0 0 ·E.11).12) W = 2 by analogy with Eqs. (4.
This is a very nice result! It tells us that the potential energy of a continuous charge distribution is stored in the electric ﬁeld. the potential falls oﬀ like 1/r. Eq. in general. the work done in bringing a charge dq to it is 1 q(r) dq dW = . At each stage we gather a small amount of charge from inﬁnity and spread it over the surface of the sphere in a thin layer from r to r +dr. Let us assume that V is a sphere. falls oﬀ like 1/r 2 . so we obtain W = 0 2 ·(E φ) d3 r + E 2 d3 r (4. We continue this process until the ﬁnal radius of the sphere is a. (4. and let us take the limit in which radius r of this sphere goes to inﬁnity. If q(r) is the charge in the sphere when it has attained radius r. we now have to assume that an electric ﬁeld possesses an energy density 0 U= E2.However. (4.21) 4π 0 r 149 .20) 2 We can easily check that Eq. therefore. However. Let us imagine building up this charge distribution from a succession of thin spherical layers of inﬁnitesimal thickness. centred on the origin.17) Application of Gauss’ theorem gives W = 0 2 S φ E · dS + E 2 dV V .19) where the integral is over all space. We know that.18) reduces to W = 0 2 E 2 d3 r.19) is correct. (4. (4. (4. Thus. It is clear that in the limit as r → ∞ the surface integral in Eq. the electric ﬁeld at large distances from a bounded charge distribution looks like the ﬁeld of a point charge and. Of course.18) falls oﬀ like 1/r and is consequently zero. Likewise. φ = −E. Suppose that we have a charge Q which is uniformly distributed within a sphere of radius a. (4.18) where V is some volume which encloses all of the charges and S is its bounding surface. (4. the surface area of the sphere increases like r 2 .
(4. Application of Gauss’ law 1 ρ dV.22) q(r) = πr3 ρ.23) Thus. (4. let us work it out using Eq. yields Er (r) = for r < a.19).21) becomes dW = 4π 2 4 ρ r dr.26) Now that we have evaluated the potential energy of a spherical charge distribution by the direct method. (4.28) r2 (4. We assume that ˆ the electric ﬁeld is radial and spherically symmetric.24) The total work needed to build up the sphere from nothing to radius a is plainly 4π 2 ρ W = 3 0 r4 dr = 0 4π 2 5 ρ a . If the constant charge density in the sphere is ρ then 4 (4. 5 4π 0 a (4. so E = E r (r) r . 3 0 a (4.25) This can also be written in terms of the total charge Q = (4/3)πa 3 ρ as W = 3 Q2 . 15 0 (4. Eq. 3 and dq = 4πr 2 ρ dr. (4.5) since the electric ﬁeld generated by a spherical charge distribution (outside itself) is the same as that of a point charge q(r) located at the origin (r = 0) (see later).This follows from Eq.27) E · dS = S 0 V where V is a sphere of radius r. (4. and Er (r) = 4π Q r 4π 0 a3 Q 0 (4.29) 150 .
r = 0. Eq. 5 4π 0 a (4.33) 151 .32) 5 4π 0 a We can think of this as the selfenergy of the i th charge. that our point charges are actually made of charge uniformly distributed over a small sphere of radius a. Thus.29) yield Q2 W = 8π 0 which reduces to W = 1 a6 a ∞ r dr + 0 a 4 dr r2 . According to Eq. we can write W = 0 2 1 E d r= 2 2 3 N N qi φ i + i=1 i=1 Wi (4. for the sake of argument.28).19) gives the correct answer. What is the energy required to assemble a point charge? In fact. (4. from which it was supposedly derived! For instance.10).19). Note that the electric ﬁeld generated outside the charge distribution is the same as that of a point charge Q located at the origin.10) plus the energy required to assemble the point charges.19) we would obtain the energy (4.11) the selfinteraction of the i th charge with its own electric ﬁeld is excluded whereas it is included in Eq. (4.26) the energy required to assemble the i th point charge is 3 qi 2 Wi = .for r ≥ a.31) Thus. (4. (4. In Eq. (4.13). (4.10) can be negative (it is certainly negative for a collection of two point charges of opposite sign). (4. The inconsistency was introduced into our analysis when we replaced Eq. (4.10) and (4.19) is manifestly positive deﬁnite. Thus. (4.30) Q2 8π 0 a 1 +1 5 = 3 Q2 . (4. (4. The reason we have checked Eq.13). Equations (4. the energy given by Eq. Thus. (4. the potential energies (4.19) are diﬀerent because in the former we start from ready made point charges whereas in the latter we build up the whole charge distribution from scratch. if we were to work out the potential energy of a point charge distribution using Eq. and (4. (4. (4. whereas the energy given by Eq.11) by Eq.19) so carefully is that on close inspection it is found to be inconsistent with Eq. it is inﬁnite! To see this let us suppose.
Consider a length l of a conductor of uniform crosssectional area A with a current I ﬂowing down it..) Thus.which enables us to reconcile Eqs. Thus. One way out of this diﬃculty would be to say that all elementary charges.19) diﬀer by an inﬁnite amount. (4. such as electrons.e. are not points but instead small distributions of charge. and it is easier to push a current down a wide rather than a narrow conducting channel. In general. we expect the electrical resistance of the conductor to be proportional to its length and inversely proportional to its area (i. nobody really understands why this prescription works. called renormalization. for short) suﬀers from the same inﬁnities in the selfenergies of particles as the classical version.10) and (4. (4.34) where V is the voltage drop across a resistor of resistance R when a current I ﬂows through it. There is a prescription. Alternatively.19). The problem of the inﬁnite selfenergies of charged particles is still unresolved.10) and (4.35) 152 .2 Ohm’s law We all know the simplest version of Ohm’s law: V = IR. What does this all mean? We have to conclude that the idea of locating electrostatic potential energy in the electric ﬁeld is inconsistent with the assumption of the existence of point charges. Unfortunately. Unfortunately. A (4. the potential energies predicted by Eqs. (4. for steering round these inﬁnities and getting ﬁnite answers which agree with experiments to extraordinary accuracy. we could say that our classical theory of electromagnetism breaks down on very small lengthscales due to quantum eﬀects. if our point charges really are point charges then a → 0 and the selfenergy of each charge becomes inﬁnite. it is harder to push an electrical current down a long rather than a short wire. Let us generalize this law so that it is expressed in terms of E and j rather than V and I. However. we can write R=η l . the quantum mechanical version of electromagnetism (quantum electrodynamics or QED. 4.
This type of heating is called “ohmic heating. In a resistor this energy is dissipated as heat. I/A = jz (suppose that the conductor is aligned along the zaxis) and V /l = Ez .” Suppose that N charges per unit time pass through a resistor.” Suppose that we apply an electric ﬁeld to an ohmic conductor. What is going to happen? According to Eq. (4.3 Conductors Most (but not all) electrical conductors obey Ohm’s law.38) the electric ﬁeld drives 153 . is P = N qV = IV per unit time. (4. (4.39) (4.37) There is nothing special about the zaxis (in an isotropic conducting medium) so the previous formula immediately generalizes to E = η j. R Equations (4. A However. The total energy gained by the charges. so the above equation reduces to Ez = ηjz .The constant η is called the resistivity and is measured in units of ohmmeters. the heating power is V2 P = IV = I R = . which appears as heat inside the resistor. A charge q which moves through a voltage drop V acquires an energy qV from the electric ﬁeld. This is the vector form of Ohm’s law.40) generalize to 2 (4. Such conductors are termed “ohmic. The current ﬂowing is obviously I = N q.41) where P is now the power dissipated per unit volume in a resistive medium.39) and (4. 4.40) P = j · E = η j2.36) V = η I. Thus. Ohm’s law becomes l (4.38) (4.
(4. φ = constant) surface.currents.43) that the potential diﬀerence between P and Q is zero. how can a conductor cancel out an applied electric ﬁeld if it contains no charges? The answer is that all of the charges reside on the surface of the conductor. ﬁrst of all. The diﬀerence in scalar potential between two points P and Q is simply Q Q φ(Q) − φ(P ) = P φ · dl = − P E · dl. This is true no matter where P and Q are situated inside the conductor. But. These redistribute the charge inside the conductor until the original electric ﬁeld is canceled out. we know that in steadystate C E · dl = 0 (4. so we conclude that the scalar potential must be uniform inside a conductor.43) · E = ρ/ 0 . However.e. E · dl. if P and Q lie inside the same conductor then it is clear from Eq. this would require a nonzero e. that (4. ρ = 0. (4.45) However. (4. there are no electric charges in the interior of a conductor.44) So. acting around a closed loop inside a conductor is impossible. At this point.. A corollary of this is that the surface of a conductor is an equipotential (i. the charges lie within one or two atomic layers of the surface (see any textbook on solidstate physics). the currents stop ﬂowing. Let us..f. It might be objected that the currents could keep ﬂowing in closed loops. Not only is the electric ﬁeld inside a conductor zero.m. with η = 0). According to Ohm’s law.m. This proves that a steadystate e. acting around each loop (unless the conductor is a superconductor. provided that there are no charges within the cavity. The only other alternative is j=E=0 inside a conductor. It immediately follows from Gauss’ law. integrate Gauss’ law over a surface S which surrounds the cavity but lies wholly in 154 . It is also possible to demonstrate that the ﬁeld within an empty cavity lying inside a conductor is also zero.f.42) around any closed loop C. In reality.
the line integral of the ﬁeld around the closed loop C is nonzero.46) for any closed loop C. Consider a loop C which straddles the cavity and the conductor. In the presence of ﬁeld lines it is clear that the line integral of E along that portion of the loop which lies inside the cavity is nonzero. from one point on the interior surface of the conductor to another. In fact. this equation implies that the line integral of the electric ﬁeld along any path which runs through the cavity. (4. This. the line integral of E along that portion of the loop which runs through the conducting material is obviously zero (since E = 0 inside a conductor). Since the electric ﬁeld is zero in a conductor. However. clearly contradicts Eq. This does not preclude the possibility that there are equal amounts of positive and negative charges distributed on the inner surface of the conductor.46). such as the one shown above. The electric ﬁeld inside a cavity is only zero if the cavity contains no charges. Thus. (4. This can only be the case if the electric ﬁeld itself is zero everywhere inside the cavity. There is one proviso to this argument. However. If there are any electric ﬁeld lines inside the cavity then they must run from the positive to the negative surface charges.Conductor S Cavity C  + + + ++ ++ the conducting material. it follows that zero net charge is enclosed by S. If the cavity contains charges then our argument fails because it is possible to envisage 155 . is zero. we can easily rule out this possibility using the steadystate relation C E · dl = 0.
So. Note that this ﬁeld must be directed normal to the surface of the conductor. so E = − φ must be locally perpendicular to a conducting surface.47) S where V is a socalled “Gaussian pillbox. Clearly. Using similar arguments to those given above. Suppose that the local surface charge density is σ. we can shield a piece of electrical equipment from stray external electric ﬁelds by placing it inside a metal can. Any parallel component would be shorted out by surface currents. shielding works both ways! Vacuum E Gaussian pillbox A Conductor Let us consider some small region on the surface of a conductor. we can also show that no static distribution of charges inside a closed conductor can ever produce a ﬁeld outside it. and that the electric ﬁeld just outside the conductor is E. Let us use Gauss’ law.” This is a pillbox shaped volume whose two ends are aligned normal to the surface of the conductor. with the 156 . Another way of saying this is that the surface of a conductor is an equipotential.that the line integral of the electric ﬁeld along many diﬀerent paths across the cavity could be zero without the ﬁelds along these paths necessarily being zero (this argument is somewhat inexact. We know that φ is always perpendicular to equipotential surfaces. (4. we shall improve it later on). We have shown that if a cavity is completely enclosed by a conductor then no stationary distribution of charges outside can ever produce any ﬁelds inside. E · dS = 1 0 V ρ dV.
then the two ends both contribute Esheet A to the surface integral. locally). and A is the crosssectional area of the box. The charge enclosed by the box is simply σ A. It is clear that E is perpendicular to the sides of the box. Thus. 157 . the only nonzero contribution to the surface integral comes from the end lying in free space. from the deﬁnition E A σ E of a surface charge density. we expect the ﬁeld generated below the sheet to be the mirror image of that above the sheet (at least. and whose sides are tangential to the surface normal. since E = 0 inside a conductor. This contribution is simply E⊥ A. Let us look at the electric ﬁeld generated by a sheet charge distribution a little more carefully. Suppose that the charge per unit area is σ. By symmetry. so the sides make no contribution to the surface integral. where E⊥ denotes an outward pointing (from the conductor) normal electric ﬁeld.surface running between them. where Esheet is the normal electric ﬁeld generated above and below the sheet. The end of the box which lies inside the conductor also makes no contribution. as shown above. Thus. The charge enclosed by the pillbox is just σ A. Gauss’ law yields E⊥ = σ 0 (4. Thus.48) as the relationship between the normal electric ﬁeld immediately outside a conductor and the surface charge density. Thus. if we integrate Gauss’ law over a pillbox of cross sectional area A.
inside the conductor) and nonzero immediately above it? Clearly. we obtain Etotal Etotal = + = 0 σ 0 above. The force per unit area acting on the surface of the conductor always acts outward and is given by p = σEext σ2 .e. The requisite ﬁeld is Eext = σ 2 0 (4. below. according to the above formula. The ﬁeld generated locally by the sheet itself obviously cannot exert a force (the sheet cannot exert a force on itself!). the additional electrostatic pressure eventually causes them to burst. how do we get the asymmetric electric ﬁeld of a conducting surface.e.53) 2 where E is the ﬁeld strength immediately above the surface of the conductor. (4.49) So. (4. The electrostatic pressure can also be written 0 p= E2. a ﬁeld which is not generated locally by the sheet charge). the electrostatic pressure is equivalent to 158 .52) Thus. = 2 0 (4. (4.51) which is in agreement with Eq. The external ﬁeld exerts a force on the charge sheet. which is zero immediately below the surface (i. we have to add in an external ﬁeld (i. (4.48). Thus.Gauss’ law yields a symmetric electric ﬁeld Esheet Esheet σ 2 0 σ = − 2 0 = + above.. The total ﬁeld is the sum of the ﬁeld generated locally by the charge sheet and the external ﬁeld. there is an electrostatic pressure acting on any charged conductor.50) both above and below the charge sheet. Note that.. This eﬀect can be visualized by charging up soap bubbles. below.
e.4 Boundary conditions on the electric ﬁeld What are the most general boundary conditions satisﬁed by the electric ﬁeld at the interface between two mediums. Fortunately. so there is no danger of your car exploding when you turn on the stereo! 4. the energy of the electric ﬁeld decreases by an amount dE = U dV = ( 0 /2) E 2 dV . Let us.. and is very useful.e. 105 newtons per meter squared) on conductors? The answer is a ﬁeld of strength E ∼ 108 volts per meter. giving rise to a net outward force. We know that if we evacuate a metal can then the pressure diﬀerence between the inside and the outside eventually causes it to implode.54) This technique for calculating a force given an expression for the energy of a system as a function of some adjustable parameter is called the principle of virtual work. giving p= 0 2 E2. This is not a coincidence. if we place the can in a strong electric ﬁeld then the pressure diﬀerence between the inside and the outside will eventually cause it to explode. this is a rather large ﬁeld. Likewise. where p is the force per unit area the ﬁeld exerts on the conductor. ﬁrst 159 .. (4. what ﬁeld exerts a negative pressure of one atmosphere (i. from energy conservation. Thus. but not from the outside. dE = dW . We can account for this by saying that the ﬁeld exerts a negative pressure p = −( 0 /2) E 2 on the conductor. The volume of this region dV = A dx.the energy density of the electric ﬁeld immediately outside the conductor. where A is the surface area of the conductor. How big a ﬁeld do we need before the electrostatic pressure diﬀerence is the same as that obtained by evacuating the can? In other words. The electric ﬁeld is excluded from the region into which the conductor expands. the interface between a vacuum and a conductor? Consider an interface P between two mediums A and B. This work is dW = p A dx. This decrease in energy can be ascribed to the work which the ﬁeld does on the conductor in order to make it expand. Thus.g. where U is the energy density of the ﬁeld. Suppose that the conductor expands by an average distance dx due to the electrostatic pressure. We have seen that an electric ﬁeld is excluded from the inside of the conductor.
(4. the presence of a charge sheet on an interface causes a discontinuity in the perpendicular component of the electric ﬁeld. the ﬂux of the electric ﬁeld out of the sides of the box is obviously negligible. Gauss’ law yields σ E⊥ A − E ⊥ B = (4. Note that any volume distribution of charge gives rise to a negligible contribution to the righthand side of the above equation in the limit where the two ends of the pillbox are very closely spaced. integrate Gauss’ law. The charge enclosed by the pillbox is simply σ A. S E · dS = (E⊥ A − E⊥ B ) A. The ends of the box can be made arbitrarily close together.e.55) S over a Gaussian pillbox S of crosssectional area A whose two ends are locally parallel to the interface. etc.56) where E⊥ A is the perpendicular (to the interface) electric ﬁeld in medium A at the interface. i..A E perp A E para A loop P E para B E perp B B of all. In this limit. In fact. What about 160 . (4. Thus. E · dS = 1 0 V l A Gaussian pillbox ρ dV. The only contribution to the ﬂux comes from the two ends.57) 0 at the interface. where σ is the sheet charge density on the interface.
where B⊥ is the component of the magnetic ﬁeld which is normal to the loop. E A −E B = 0. Such a device is called a “capacitor.e. Air is a very good insulator. 4. air ceases to be an insulator when the electric ﬁeld strength through it exceeds some critical value which is about E crit ∼ 106 volts per meter. This phenomenon. a good charge storing device is one which holds a large amount of charge but only generates small electric ﬁelds.58) C S around a rectangular loop C whose long sides.60) i. (4.the parallel electric ﬁeld? Let us integrate Faraday’s law. etc. The ﬂux of the magnetic ﬁeld through the loop is approximately B⊥ A. which is called “breakdown.5 Capacitors We can store electrical charge on the surface of a conductor. and A is the area of the loop. However. The conductor can only successfully store charge if it is electrically insulated from its surroundings. the ﬂux also tends to zero. But. The dominant contribution to the loop integral comes from the long sides: E · dl = (E A C −E B ) l. The most well known example of the breakdown of air is during a lightning strike. A → 0 as the short sides of the loop are shrunk to zero so. (4.59) where E A is the parallel (to the interface) electric ﬁeld in medium A at the interface.” 161 . length l. run parallel to the interface.. unless the magnetic ﬁeld becomes inﬁnite (we assume that it does not). The length of the short sides is assumed to be arbitrarily small. Thus. Clearly. there can be no discontinuity in the parallel component of the electric ﬁeld across an interface. E · dl = − ∂ ∂t B · dS. (4.” is associated with the formation of sparks. Unfortunately. electric ﬁelds will be generated immediately above the surface.
Suppose that the upper plate carries a positive charge and that the lower plate carries a negative charge.” This is usually denoted C. The capacitance of a charge storing 162 . below. Thus. conducting plates√ crosssectional area A which of are separated by a small distance d (i.49). or set of conductors.64) 0 It is conventional to measure the capacity of a conductor. (4. Suppose that each plate carries an equal and opposite charge Q. (4. the ﬁeld generated by the lower plate is Elower Elower σ 2 0 σ = + 2 0 = − above. d A). parallel. the net ﬁeld is normal to the plates and of magnitude E⊥ E⊥ = σ 0 between. the potential diﬀerence between the plates is simply σd V = E⊥ d = . below. The total ﬁeld is the sum of the two ﬁelds generated by the upper and lower plates.62) Note that we are neglecting any “leakage” of the ﬁeld at the edges of the plates. We expect this charge to spread evenly over the plates to give an eﬀective sheet charge density σ = ±Q/A on each plate. This is reasonable if the plates are closely spaced.e.. otherwise.Consider two thin.61) Likewise. (4.63) = 0 Since the electric ﬁeld is uniform. the ﬁeld generated by the upper plate is normal to the plate and of magnitude Eupper Eupper σ 2 0 σ = − 2 0 = + above. (4. to store charge but generate small electric ﬁelds in terms of a parameter called the “capacitance. According to Eq. (4.
68) This is a general result which holds for all types of capacitor. where V is the instantaneous voltage diﬀerence between the plates.65). or farads. The total work done in charging the capacitor is 1 Q Q2 1 W = q dq = = CV 2 . For a parallel plate capacitor it is clear that C= σA = V 0 A .66) Note that the capacitance only depends on geometric quantities such as the area and spacing of the plates. Suppose that the charge ±Q on each plate is built up gradually by transferring small amounts of charge from one plate to another. 163 . Thus. (4. the constant of proportionality (the inverse of the capacitance) can only depend on geometry. 2 (4. (4. If the instantaneous charge on the plates is ±q and an inﬁnitesimal amount of positive charge dq is transferred from the negatively charged plate to the positively charge plate then the work done is dW = V dq = q dq/C. W = 1 CV 2 . capacitance is measured in coulombs per volt. a good charge storing device has a high capacitance. Thus. double the potential diﬀerence between the conductors.67) C 0 2C 2 where use has been made of Eq. the potential diﬀerence between conductors is always directly proportional to the charge carried. Incidentally. Q (4. d (4. V Clearly.65) C= . Note that the voltage diﬀerence is such that it opposes any increase in the charge on either plate. The energy stored in the capacitor is the same as the work required to charge up the capacitor. This is a rather unwieldy unit since good capacitors typically have capacitances which are only about one millionth of a farad. Thus. If we double the charge on conductors then we double the electric ﬁelds generated around them and we.device is simply the ratio of the charge stored to the potential diﬀerence generated by the charge. This is a consequence of the superposability of electric ﬁelds. therefore.
73) . which we discussed earlier. (4. This ﬁeld is of approximately constant magnitude E⊥ = V /d and occupies a region of volume A d. (4.72) a. The radial electric ﬁeld generated outside the sphere is given by Er (r > a) = Q .70) It is not necessary to have two oppositely charged conductors in order to make a capacitor. (4. (4. or extracts energy from.69) W = 2 d2 2 where use has been made of Eq. more realistically. some large. 0 The idea. Consider an isolated sphere of radius a which carries a charge Q. relatively distant reservoir of charge such as the Earth. some time later.71) The potential diﬀerence between the sphere and inﬁnity.69) agree.67) and (4. Note that Eqs. We all know that if we connect a capacitor across the terminals of a battery then a transient current ﬂows as the capacitor charges up.66). 2 d (4. or. is V = Thus. the energy stored in the electric ﬁeld is 1 V2 Ad = CV 2 . The capacitor can then be placed to one side and. so we can think of a capacitor as a device which either stores energy in. the capacitance of the sphere is C= Q = 4π V 164 0 Q . Thus. What is interesting here is that the energy stored in the capacitor is stored as an electric ﬁeld. the stored charge can be used. that an electric ﬁeld exerts a negative pressure p = −( 0 /2) E 2 on conductors immediately suggests that the two plates in a parallel plate capacitor attract one another with a mutual force F = 0 2 2 E⊥ 1 CV 2 A= . 4π 0 a (4. to transiently light a bulb in an electrical circuit. given the energy density of an electric ﬁeld U = ( 0 /2) E 2 .The energy of a charged parallel plate capacitor is actually stored in the electric ﬁeld between the plates. 4π 0 r2 (4. for instance. an electric ﬁeld.
e.75): Eb a = . The wire allows charge to move back and forth between the spheres until they reach the same potential (with respect to inﬁnity). Equation (4.g. (4. which are connected by an electric wire. Let Q be the charge on the ﬁrst sphere and Q the charge on the second sphere. Of course.71) and (4. Intense local electric ﬁelds are generated in these regions. It follows from Eq. (4.The energy of a sphere when it carries a charge Q is again given by (1/2) C V 2 . b large sphere grabs most of the charge: a Q = Q b 1. It can easily be demonstrated that this is really the energy contained in the electric ﬁeld around the sphere. leading to sparking and the eventual 165 . Any sharp spikes on the surface will inevitably have comparatively small radii of curvature. It is clear that if we wish to store signiﬁcant amounts of charge on a conductor then the surface of the conductor must be made as smooth as possible.. a+b b . The electric ﬁeld above some point on the surface of a conductor is inversely proportional to the local radius of curvature of the surface. then the Note that if one sphere is much smaller than the other one.75) The ratio of the electric ﬁelds generated just above the surfaces of the two spheres follows from Eqs. the total charge Q0 = Q + Q carried by the two spheres is a conserved quantity. Suppose that we have two spheres of radii a and b. respectively.76) If b a then the ﬁeld just above the smaller sphere is far bigger than that above the larger sphere.74) a. Ea b (4. a+b (4. These can easily exceed the critical ﬁeld for the break down of air.72) that Q Q0 Q Q0 = = a . (4.76) is a simple example of a far more general rule.
For a < r < b we ﬁnd that 2πrl Er (r) = so Er = ql 0 . As a ﬁnal example. consider two coaxial conducting cylinders of radii a and b.77) q 2π 0 r (4. a (4. The potential diﬀerence between the inner and outer cylinders is inner outer V = − b outer E · dl = inner b E · dl (4. Let us integrate Gauss’ law over a cylinder of radius r. and of length l.79) = a q Er dr = 2π V = q 2π 0 a dr . (4. V ln b/a (4.80) Thus. coaxial with the conductors.loss of the charge on the conductor.78) for a < r < b. respectively. We can safely assume that E = ˆ Er (r) r . by symmetry (adopting standard cylindrical polar coordinates). It is fairly obvious that Er = 0 if r is not in the range a to b. Suppose that the charge per unit length carried by the inner and outer cylinders is +q and −q. where a < b. Sparking can also be very destructive because the associated electric currents ﬂow through very localized regions giving rise to intense heating. 166 . the capacitance per unit length of the two cylinders is C= q 2π 0 = . r so 0 b ln .81) This is a particularly useful result which we shall need later on in this course.
7 The uniqueness theorem We have already seen the great value of the uniqueness theorem for Poisson’s equation (or Laplace’s equation) in our discussion of Helmholtz’s theorem (see Section 3. what else is there to say about Poisson’s equation? Well.84) to Poisson’s equation is completely useless. Let us now try to develop some techniques for solving Poisson’s equation which allow us to solve real problems (which invariably involve conductors). Suppose that we are given the charge density ρ throughout V and the value of the scalar potential φ S on S. 167 . with the scalar potential satisfying Poisson’s equation ρ 2 φ=− . 0 (4. The surface charge distribution induced on the sphere is such that it is maintained at a constant electrical potential. The charge attracts negative charges to the near side of the sphere and repels positive charges to the far side. Consider a volume V bounded by some surface S. The only things which we know about the surface of the sphere are that it is an equipotential and carries zero net charge.82) (4. Let us now examine this theorem in detail. insulated.83) We even know the general solution to this equation: φ(r) = 1 4π 0 ρ(r ) 3 d r.10). We now have a problem.6 Poisson’s equation We know that in steady state we can write E = − φ. r − r  (4. Clearly.4. in the presence of conducting surfaces the solution (4.84) So.84) to work out the potential φ(r) around the sphere. We cannot use formula (4. since we do not know how the charges induced on the conducting surface are distributed. consider a positive (say) point charge in the vicinity of an uncharged. 4. conducting sphere.
using Gauss’ theorem ( φ 3 )2 + φ 3 V 2 φ3 ) = ( φ 3 )2 + φ 3 2 φ3 .90) φ3 dV = S φ3 φ3 · dS.88) (4. (4.92) 168 .85) 2 ρ 0 throughout V . (4. 2 φ3 = 0 throughout V and φ3 = 0 on S.91) But. so the above equation reduces to ( φ3 )2 dV = 0. Let there be two potentials φ1 and φ2 which satisfy 2 φ1 φ2 = − = − ρ 0 . and φ3 = 0 on S. V (4. and φ1 φ2 = φS . The potential φ3 clearly satisﬁes 2 (4.89) throughout V .87) φ3 = 0 (4. According to vector ﬁeld theory · (φ3 Thus. that the solution is not unique.Is this suﬃcient information to uniquely specify the scalar potential throughout V ? Suppose. (4. = φS (4. for the sake of argument.86) on S. We can form the diﬀerence between these two potentials: φ3 = φ 1 − φ 2 .
Our initial assumption that φ 1 and φ2 are two diﬀerent solutions of Laplace’s equations. since ( φ 3 )2 is positive deﬁnite it follows that φ3 = constant throughout V . we do not know what potential each surface is at (unless we are speciﬁcally told that it is earthed. So. The fact that the solutions to Poisson’s equation are unique is very useful. we have φ = V on the boundary of the cavity and 2 φ = 0 inside the cavity (since it contains no charges). We know that the interior surface of the conductor is at some constant potential V . One rather obvious solution to these equations is φ = V throughout the cavity. Recall that our previous proof of this was rather involved.94) (4.96) inside the cavity. However. satisfying the same boundary conditions. The only way in which the volume integral of a positive deﬁnite quantity can be zero is if that quantity itself is zero throughout the volume. Since the solutions to Poisson’s equation are unique this is the only solution. but. we could have positive and negative contributions from various regions inside the volume which cancel one another out. φ1 = φ 2 (4.Note that ( φ3 )2 is a positive deﬁnite quantity. In other words. say. Thus.93) . 169 (4. E=− φ=− V =0 (4.95) throughout V and on S. turns out to be incorrect. and was also not particularly rigorous (see Section 4. Thus.3). Suppose that some volume V contains a number of conductors. This is not necessarily the case for a nonpositive deﬁnite quantity. in general. One immediate use of the uniqueness theorem is to prove that the electric ﬁeld inside an empty cavity in a conductor is zero. We know that the surface of each conductor is an equipotential. so we get φ3 = 0 throughout V . we know that φ3 = 0 on S. It means that if we ﬁnd a solution to this equation—no matter how contrived the derivation—then this is the only possible solution.
suppose that it is not enough information. Suppose that there are N conductors.99) S Qtotal 0 S over the bounding surface. ﬁnally.).etc.100) is the total charge contained in volume V . E1 · dSi E2 · dSi = = Qtotal 0 . each carrying a charge Qi (i = 1 to N ). (4.97) = = Qi 0 . (4. with E1 · dSi E2 · dSi = ρ 0 (4. However. if the conductors are insulated it is plausible that we might know the charge on each conductor. and. 170 (4. Is this enough information to uniquely specify the electric ﬁeld throughout V ? Well. 0 · E2 throughout V . so that there are two ﬁelds E1 and E2 which satisfy ρ · E1 = .101) . and suppose that the region V containing these conductors is ﬁlled by a known charge density ρ and bounded by some surface S which is either inﬁnity or an enclosing conductor.98) Si Qi 0 Si on the surface of the ith conductor. Let us form the diﬀerence ﬁeld E3 = E 1 − E 2 . where N Qtotal = i=1 Qi + V ρ dV (4.
107) · (φ3 E3 ) = −E32 N V throughout V . Either way. (4. Integrating over V and making use of Gauss’ theorem yields E32 dV = − φ3 E3 · dSi − φ3 E3 · dS.105) then φ3 is a constant on the surface of each conductor. Consider the vector identity · (φ3 E3 ) = φ3 We have to · E3 = 0 throughout V and · E3 + E3 · φ3 . Furthermore.102) (4. So. φ3 is constant on S.106) φ3 = −E3 . for all i. (4. if the outer surface S is inﬁnity then φ1 = φ2 = φ3 = 0 on this surface.109) 171 . If the outer surface is an enclosing conductor then φ3 is a constant on this surface.It is clear that · E3 = 0 throughout V . (4.103) and (4. we obtain V E32 dV = 0. we know that each conductor is at a constant potential.104) S Now. so the above identity reduces (4. with (4. (4. φ3 is a constant on the surfaces Si and S. so if E3 = − φ 3 . and Si (4. making use of Eqs.103) E3 · dSi = 0 E3 · dS = 0.108) i=1 Si S However. (4.104).
conducting plate. the answer is that we use a computer. subject to the 172 . We also know that the potential at inﬁnity is zero (this is our usual boundary condition for the scalar potential). What is the scalar potential above the plane? This is not a simple question because the point charge induces surface charges on the plate. (4. grounded.e.e. and we do not know how these are distributed.) then we can uniquely determine the electric ﬁeld.110) 4. What do we know in this problem? We know that the conducting plate is an equipotential.8 The classical image problem So. i.. However. 0. the ﬁelds E1 and E2 are identical throughout V . i. how do we actually solve Poisson’s equation. E32 is a positive deﬁnite quantity.111) in practice? In general. Let us discuss some of these solutions. ρ(x. Thus. 0. so the above relation implies that E3 = 0 throughout V . y. we need to solve Poisson’s equation in the region z > 0. for a single point charge q at position (0. There are many other uniqueness theorems which generalize this result still further. where it is possible to ﬁnd analytic solutions. Let the plate lie in the xy plane and suppose that the point charge is located at coordinates (0. ∂x2 ∂y ∂z 0 (4. we could be given the potential of some of the conductors and the charge carried by the others and the solution would still be unique. possessing a high degree of symmetry. if we are given either the potential at the surface of each conductor or the charge carried by each conductor (plus the charge density throughout the volume. there are a few situations. It is clear that. z) ∂2φ ∂2φ ∂2φ + 2 + 2 =− . In fact. the potential of the plate is zero..Of course. etc. d). d). for a general electrostatic problem involving charges and conductors. Suppose that we have a point charge q held a distance d from an inﬁnite. since it is grounded.
Now. Now that we know the potential in the region z > 0. so that φ = 0 in this region. in the region z > 0. y. however. and as x2 + y 2 + z 2 → ∞.116) q φanalogue → 0 173 . wellposed set of boundary conditions. we can easily work out the distribution of charges induced on the conducting plate.117) 0 (4. it would be hard to convince a skeptical person that φ = φanalogue is the correct solution in the region z > 0. We refer to this as the analogue problem. d) and a charge −q located at (0. We get φanalogue (x. (4.boundary conditions φ(z = 0) = 0. So.112) (4. φanalogue satisﬁes Poisson’s equation for a charge at (0. Of course. z) = Note. d). φanalogue is a solution to the problem posed earlier.115) (4. Note that we are leaning pretty heavily on the uniqueness theorem here! Without this theorem. We already know that the relation between the electric ﬁeld immediately above a conducting surface and the density of charge on the surface is σ E⊥ = . in the region z > 0. We know this because the grounded plate shields the region z < 0 from the point charge. 0. and as x2 + y 2 + z 2 → ∞. 0. Thus.113) φ→∞ 1 4π 0 q x2 + y 2 + (z − d)2 − . for a minute. the uniqueness theorem tells us that there is only one solution to Poisson’s equation which satisﬁes a given.114) (4. We can easily ﬁnd the scalar potential for this problem. φanalogue is completely wrong in the region z < 0. In the analogue problem we have a charge q located at (0. x2 + y 2 + (z + d)2 (4. since we know where all the charges are located. φanalogue must be the correct potential in the region z > 0. In addition. 0. Let us forget about the real problem. that φanalogue (z = 0) = 0. d) with no conductors present. and concentrate on a slightly diﬀerent one.
Thus. (4. qd Q=− 2 ∞ 0 2πr dr . hence.114) that ∂φ q = ∂z 4π so σ(x. (r2 + d2 )3/2 (4. (4.123) 1 dk = qd (k + d2 )3/2 (k + d2 )1/2 ∞ 0 = −q.In this case. in the vicinity of the point charge is the same as in the analogue problem then 174 . the charge induced on the plate has the opposite sign to the point charge. and. presumably. What is this force? Well. ∂z (4. E⊥ = Ez (z = 0+ ) = − so σ=− It follows from Eq. This. y) = − (z + d) −(z − d) + 2 [x2 + y 2 + (z − d)2 ]3/2 [x + y 2 + (z + d)2 ]3/2 qd . gives rise to a force of attraction between the charge and the plate.121) Clearly.120) 0 ∂φ(z = 0+ ) ∂φanalogue (z = 0+ ) =− . 2π(x2 + y 2 + d2 )3/2 .119) 0 (4. (4. and is largest where the plate is closest to the point charge. The charge density on the plate is also symmetric about the zaxis. the electric ﬁeld.124) So. The total charge induced on the plate is Q= x−y plane σ dS. since the potential. the total charge induced on the plate is equal and opposite to the point charge which induces it. ∞ 0 (4.122) which yields qd Q=− 2π where r2 = x2 + y 2 . Our point charge induces charges of the opposite sign on the conducting plate.118) (4. ∂z ∂z ∂φanalogue (z = 0+ ) .
W = 0 2 E 2 dV. y. E(z < 0) = 0. ﬁnally. This is why the technique of replacing conducting surfaces by imaginary charges is called “the method of images. the real charge) is F =− 1 q2 ˆ z.the force on the charge must be the same as well. 2 2 E 2 dV = z>0 2 z>0 2 Eanalogue dV = (4.” We know that the potential energy of a set of charges is equivalent to the energy stored in the electric ﬁeld.131) 0 0 0 2 z>0 2 Eanalogue dV. So.126) Wanalogue = − 4π 0 2d Note that the ﬁelds on opposite sides of the conducting plate are mirror images of one another in the analogue problem. Thus. 4π 0 (2d)2 (4. 0. W = giving 1 q2 W =− . y. In the analogue problem there are two charges ±q a net distance 2d apart. It follows that Wanalogue = 2 In the real problem E(z > 0) = Eanalogue (z > 0). so E 2 (x.127) In the analogue problem the ﬁelds on either side of the xy plane are mirror images of one another. all space (4. For the analogue problem this is just 1 q2 . z) = E 2 (x. The force on the charge at position (0. (4. So are the charges (apart from the change in sign). (4.e.125) What. 4π 0 4d 175 (4. d) (i.128) (4.129) 1 Wanalogue ..130) . −z). is the potential energy of the system.
Suppose that the charge is gradually moved towards the plate along the zaxis from inﬁnity until it reaches position (0.133) q2 q2 1 − dz = 4z 2 4π 0 4z d ∞ 1 q2 . Unfortunately.134) Of course.9 Complex analysis Let us now investigate another “trick” for solving Poisson’s equation (actually it only solves Laplace’s equation).135) (z should not be confused with a zcoordinate. 0. a sphere) with an imaginary charge (or charges) which mimics the electric ﬁeld in some region (but not everywhere).. The complex variable is conventionally written z = x + iy (4. 4π 0 4z 2 The total work needed to move the charge from z = ∞ to z = d is 1 W = 4π 0 d ∞ (4. this work is equivalent to the potential energy we evaluated earlier. 4. this method can only be applied in two dimensions.g. Unfortunately. this is a strictly two dimensional problem). each of which involves replacing a conductor (e. we do not have time to discuss any more of these problems.132) Thus. 4π 0 4z 2 (4. the work required to move this charge by dz is 1 q2 dW = −Fz dz = dz. There are many diﬀerent image problems. d). and is. the same as the energy contained in the electric ﬁeld. =− 4π 0 4d (4. We can write functions F (z) of the complex variable just like we would 176 . How much work is required to achieve this? We know that the force of attraction acting on the charge is Fz = − 1 q2 . in turn.There is another method by which we can obtain the above result.
(4.write functions of a real variable.138) (4. Thus. where U and V are two real two dimensional functions. F (z) = z 2 . δz (4. y) = 2xy.141). V (x. giving U (x. For instance. we now have a slight problem.140) (4. Thus.142) dz 177 . F (z) = 1 . If F (z) is a “well deﬁned” function (we shall leave it to the mathematicians to specify exactly what being well deﬁned entails: suﬃce to say that most functions we can think of are well deﬁned) then it should not matter from which direction in the complex plane we approach z when taking the limit in Eq. (4.141) However. y). but if we look at a regular complex function. of course. say. z (4.136) For a given function F (z) we can substitute z = x + i y and write F (z) = U (x.139) (4. dF = dz lim δz→∞ F (z + δz) − F (z) . There are.137) We can deﬁne the derivative of a complex function in just the same manner as we would deﬁne the derivative of a real function. F (z) = z 2 . if F (z) = z 2 . then F (x + i y) = (x + i y)2 = (x2 − y 2 ) + 2 i xy. y) = x2 − y 2 . then dF = 2z (4. y) + i V (x. many diﬀerent directions we could approach z from.
141). If F (z) is well deﬁned then U and V automatically satisfy the CauchyRiemann equations: ∂U ∂x = 178 ∂V . no matter which path we approach z from. ∂y (4. so that δz = δx. (4. U (x + δx. ∂y ∂y If F (z) is a well deﬁned function then its derivative must also be well deﬁned.141) has to give the same result. Suppose that we approach z along the real axis. y) + i V (x + δx. ∂y ∂U . y) − i V (x. y) δx ∂V ∂U +i . y + δy) + i V (x.144) = −i ∂U ∂V + .is perfectly well deﬁned and is. means that there are some restrictions on the functions U and V in Eq. (4. y + δy) − U (x. Then. we have found that a general complex function F (z) can be written F (z) = U (x. The fact that Eq. y) i δy (4. y) + i V (x. (4. (4. therefore. which implies that the above two expressions are equivalent. ∂y . So far. completely independent of the details of how the limit is taken in Eq. (4. y) − i V (x. y). suﬃcient to ensure that all possible ways of taking the limit (4.145) = − These are called the CauchyRiemann equations and are. y) − U (x. in fact.141) give the same answer.143) = ∂x ∂x Suppose that we now approach z along the imaginary axis.146) where z = x + i y. so that δz = i δy. This requires that ∂U ∂x ∂V ∂x = ∂V . = lim δx→0 dF dz dF dz = lim δy→0 U (x. Then.137).
∂x ∂y . we can combine the two CauchyRiemann relations. both U and V automatically satisfy Laplace’s equation in two dimensions.149) which reduce to = 0. .150) Thus. what has all of this got to do with electrostatics? Well.∂V ∂x = − ∂U . =− ∂x2 ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂2U ∂2U + ∂x2 ∂y 2 ∂2V ∂2V + ∂x2 ∂y 2 (4.147) But. (4.153) 179 .152) It follows from the CauchyRiemann equations that U· V = ∂V ∂V ∂V ∂V − = 0. = 0. ∂y ∂x ∂x ∂y (4. ∂x ∂y ∂V ∂V . We get ∂2U ∂ ∂V ∂ ∂U ∂ ∂V = =− . ∂y (4.151) ∂U ∂V ∂U ∂V + . Consider the two dimensional gradients of U and V : U V Now U· V = = = ∂U ∂U .. = ∂x2 ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂y and ∂ ∂U ∂ ∂V ∂ ∂U ∂2V =− =− . (4. i. ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y (4. both U and V are possible two dimensional scalar potentials in free space.e.148) (4.
The scalar potential in the region between these conductors is given by V U (x. Consider the contours of U at level ±1. the contours of U are everywhere perpendicular to the contours of V . y U = 1 U V x U=1 U=0 U=1 U=0 U = 1 U (x. y). But. = 2xy. the equations of two sets of orthogonal hyperboloids. y) (the solid lines in the ﬁgure) might represent the contours of some scalar potential and V (x. for which U V = x2 − y 2 . For every well deﬁned complex function F (z) we can think of. For example. y) (the dashed lines in the ﬁgure) the associated electric ﬁeld lines.155) . These could represent the surfaces of four hyperboloid conductors maintained at potentials ±V. and vice versa. we get two sets of free space potentials and the associated electric ﬁeld lines. how could we actually generate a hyperboloidal potential? This is easy.Thus. or vice versa. So. (4. It follows that if U maps out the contours of some free space scalar potential then V indicates the directions of the associated electric ﬁeld lines.154) These are. y) and the associated electric ﬁeld lines follow the contours of V (x. consider the function F (z) = z 2 . Note that Ex = − ∂U ∂φ = −V = −2Vx ∂x ∂x 180 (4. in fact.
We can think of the set of all possible well deﬁned complex functions as a reference library of solutions to Laplace’s equation in two dimensions.10 Separation of variables The method of images and complex analysis are two rather elegant techniques for solving Poisson’s equation. thin. We have only considered a single example but there are. and the other at y = π. grounded.Thus. very many complex functions which generate interesting potentials. 4. conducting plates lying parallel to the xz plane. F (z) = z 1/2 generates the potential around a semiinﬁnite. is somewhat messy but possess a far wider range of application. namely. For instance. The ﬁnal technique we shall discuss in this course. conducting plate placed in an external ﬁeld. Consider two semiinﬁnite. one at y = 0. What is the potential in the region between the plates? y plate x=0 y=0 x 181 y =π . for the ycomponent of the ﬁeld. This property can be exploited to make devices (called quadrupole electrostatic lenses) which are useful for focusing particle beams. at x = 0. is closed oﬀ by an inﬁnite strip insulated from the two plates and maintained at a speciﬁed potential φ0 (y). they both have an extremely limited range of application. the separation of variables. Unfortunately. grounded. the xcomponent of the electric ﬁeld is directly proportional to the distance from the xaxis. Let us examine a speciﬁc example. Likewise. whereas F (z) = z 3/2 yields the potential outside a grounded rectangular conducting corner under similar circumstances. of course. The left end.
This reduces the problem to two dimensions. Substituting (4. π) = 0 for x > 0. y) → 0 (4. The central assumption in the method of separation of variables is that a multidimensional potential can be written as the product of onedimensional potentials. it turns out that by adding together lots of diﬀerent solutions of this form we can match to general boundary conditions. we obtain Y d2 Y d2 Y +X = 0. Poisson’s equation is written ∂2φ ∂2φ + 2 =0 (4. since everything else in the problem is. i.162) X dx2 Y dy 2 182 . (4. plus φ(0.156) ∂x2 ∂y in the vacuum region between the conductors. 1 d2 X 1 d2 Y =− .156).160) into (4. so that φ(x. y) = φ0 (y) for 0 ≤ y ≤ π. and φ(x. Thus. However. The latter boundary condition is our usual one for the scalar potential at inﬁnity. dx2 dy 2 (4. only likely to satisfy a very small subset of possible boundary conditions. and is.161) Let us now separate the variables. let us collect all of the xdependent terms on one side of the equation. φ(x..160) The above solution is obviously a very special one. (4. 0) = 0.159) (4. The boundary conditions are φ(x. therefore.158) (4.e.157b) as x → ∞. and all of the ydependent terms on the other side.157a) (4. y) = X(x)Y (y).We ﬁrst of all assume that the potential is zindependent. since the two plates are earthed.
1 d2 X 1 d2 Y 2 =k =− .166) (4. (4. 2 dy We know the general solution to these equations: X Y giving φ = ( A exp(kx) + B exp(−kx) )(C sin ky + D cos ky). for general x and y. (4.157a) is automatically satisﬁed if D = 0.165) Here. 2 dx d2 Y = −k 2 Y. y) = C exp(−nx) sin ny. A. Note that the choice k 2 .157b) is satisﬁed provided that sin kπ = 0. (4. rather than −k 2 .169) 183 . = C sin ky + D cos ky. Thus. The only way in which the above equation can be satisﬁed. (4. in Eq. n (say).164) X dx2 Y dy 2 The reason why we write k 2 . instead of −k 2 .168) which implies that k is a positive integer.164) facilitates this by making φ either grow or decay monotonically in the xdirection instead of oscillating. So.167) = A exp(kx) + B exp(−kx). (4. The boundary condition (4.159) is automatically satisﬁed if A = 0 and k > 0. our solution reduces to φ(x. will become apparent later on.This equation has the form f (x) = g(y). The boundary condition (4. (4.163) where f and g are general functions. is if both sides are equal to the same constant. and D are arbitrary constants. (4. Equation (4. C. The boundary condition (4.164) separates into two ordinary diﬀerential equations: d2 X = k 2 X. B.
it would appear that the method of separation of variables only works for a very special subset of boundary conditions.171) The question now is what choice of the Cn ﬁts an arbitrary function φ0 (y)? To answer this question we can make use of two very useful properties of the functions sin ny. that they are mutually orthogonal and form a complete set. The completeness property of sine functions means that any general function φ0 (y) can always be adequately represented as a weighted sum of sine functions with various diﬀerent n values. However. (4.157) and (4. y) = n=1 Cn sin ny = φ0 (y).159). Now comes the clever bit! Since Poisson’s equation is linear. Note that this solution is only able to satisfy the ﬁnal boundary condition (4. y) = n=1 Cn exp(−nx) sin ny. at ﬁrst sight.where B has been absorbed into C.172) 2 0 where the function δnn = 1 if n = n and 0 otherwise is called a Kroenecker delta. The ﬁnal boundary condition (4.169) by adding together lots of solutions involving diﬀerent values of n. (4. Thus. Thus. (4. Multiplying both sides of Eq. (4.173) 184 .158) provided φ 0 (y) is proportional to sin ny. this is not the case. ∞ φ(x. The orthogonality property of these functions manifests itself through the relation π π sin ny sin n y dy = δnn .171) by sin n y and integrating over y we obtain ∞ π π Cn n=1 0 sin ny sin n y dy = 0 φ0 (y) sin n y dy.170) where the Cn are constants.158) reduces to ∞ φ(0. any linear combination of solutions is also a solution. Namely. We can therefore form a more general solution than (4. (4. This solution automatically satisﬁes the boundary conditions (4.
e. (4.e. y) = 2φ0 tan−1 π sin y sinh x .177) (4.176) This potential can be summed explicitly to give φ(x. The 185 . we now have a general solution to the problem for any driving potential φ0 (y).179) 4 φ0 nπ (4. Thus. If the potential φ0 (y) is constant then 2 φ0 Cn = π giving Cn = 0 for even n.175) Thus. the sinusoidal functions). y) = 4 φ0 π exp(−nx) sin nx . In the above problem we write the potential as the product of one dimensional functions.174) 2 Cn = π φ0 (y) sin ny dy. 0 (4. nπ (4.. 0 (4.180) In this form it is easy to check that Poisson’s equation is obeyed and that all of the boundary conditions are satisﬁed.3. φ(x. the exponential functions) and the others oscillate (i. Some of these functions grow and decay monotonically (i.. and Cn = for odd n.5 (4.178) π sin ny dy = 0 2 φ0 (1 − cos nπ). n n=1.The orthogonality relation yields π 2 so ∞ Cn δnn n=1 π = Cn = 2 π π φ0 (y) sin n y dy.
The latter are both mutually orthogonal and form a complete set. sources (e.181) for n = m. It turns out that the scheme set out above can be generalized to more complicated geometries. a (4. We should now move on to magnetostatics—i. There are also cylindrical.m. Some of the ﬁeld lines of B1 will pass through the second loop. toroidal. Let us run a steady current I1 around the ﬁrst loop to produce a ﬁeld B1 . Consider two stationary loops of wire.. coordinates. 4. inductors. Clearly. A set of functions fn (x) is orthogonal if the integral of the product of two diﬀerent members of the set over some range is always zero: b fn (x)fm (x) dx = 0.. Let Φ2 be the ﬂux of B1 through loop 2: Φ2 = loop 2 B1 · dS2 . batteries). Electrical engineers like to reduce all pieces of electrical apparatus to an equivalent circuit consisting only of e.e. Let us skip this topic. in spherical geometry the monotonic functions are power law functions of the radial variable and the oscillatory functions are Legendre polynomials. ellipsoidal. In all cases. and resistors. etc.g. once we understand inductors we shall be ready to apply the laws of electromagnetism to real life situations. (4.182) 186 . This implies that the method of separation of variables is of quite general applicability. the associated oscillating functions are mutually orthogonal and form a complete set.11 Inductors We have now completed our investigation of electrostatics. It contains nothing new (it merely consists of the application of Amp`re’s law and the BiotSavart law) and is also e exceptionally dull! We have learned about resistance and capacitance.f. A set of functions is complete if any other function can be expanded as a weighted sum of them. hyperbolic. the study of steady magnetic ﬁelds generated by steady currents. For instance. labeled 1 and 2. Let us now investigate inductance. capacitors.success of the method depends crucially on the orthogonality and completeness of the oscillatory functions.
we can write Φ2 = M21 I1 . B1 (r) = µ0 I 1 4π dl1 ∧ (r − r ) . However.186) where dl2 is a line element of loop 2. we know that A1 (r) = µ0 I 1 4π dl1 . r − r  (4. r − r 3 (4. This constant is called the mutual inductance of the two loops. (4. It follows that the ﬂux Φ2 must also be proportional to I1 . we can infer from the BiotSavart law. Thus. (4.where dS2 is a surface element of loop 2. This is ultimately a consequence of the linearity of Maxwell’s equations. where dA is the cross sectional area of loop 1. Thus. (4. (4.188) all space for j(r ) = dl1 I1 /dl1 dA and d3 r = dl1 dA. However.184) where M21 is the constant of proportionality. µ0 I 1 dl1 · dl2 Φ2 = .189) 4π loop 1 loop 2 r − r  187 . A1 (r) = µ0 4π j(r ) 3 d r.187) loop 1 The above equation is just a special case of the more general law. Let us write the ﬁeld B1 in terms of a vector potential A1 . so that B1 = It follows from Stokes’ theorem that Φ2 = loop 2 ∧ A1 . Here.185) B1 · dS2 = loop 2 ∧ A1 · dS2 = loop 2 A1 · dl2 . This ﬂux is generally quite diﬃcult to calculate exactly (unless the two loops have a particularly simple geometry). r − r  (4.183) loop 1 that the magnitude of B1 is proportional to the current I1 . dl 1 is a line element of loop 1 located at position vector r .
1 henry is 1 voltsecond per ampere. Secondly. M21 = M12 . (4.192) The constant of proportionality L is called the self inductance. ﬂux is also generated through the ﬁrst loop. therefore. the magnetic ﬁeld. As before. 2. However. the above formula tells us two important things. and is given by B = µ0 N I. r − r  (4. shapes. mutual inductances are rarely worked out from ﬁrst principles—it is usually too diﬃcult. Consider a long solenoid of length l and radius r which has N turns per unit length.191) In fact. like the farad. the mutual inductance of two loops is a purely geometric quantity. 1. the integral is unchanged of we switch the roles of loops 1 and 2. we can drop the subscripts and just call these quantities M . Inductance is measured in S. and relative orientations of the loops. However. and carries a current I.e. It implies that no matter what the shapes and relative positions of the two loops. In other words.where r is now the position vector of the line element dl2 of loop 2.. generates a magnetic ﬂux linking some other loop. Like M it only depends on the geometry of the loop.190) loop 1 loop 2 In fact. the ﬂux through loop 2 when we run a current I around loop 1 is exactly the same as the ﬂux through loop 1 when we send the same current around loop 2. is a rather unwieldy unit since most real life inductors have a inductances of order a microhenry. units called henries (H). (4. so we can write Φ = L I.193) 188 . (4. the ﬂux Φ.I. The above equation implies that M21 = µ0 4π dl1 · dl2 . directed along the axis of the solenoid) magnetic ﬁeld within the solenoid is approximately uniform. The longitudinal (i. Firstly. We have seen that a current I ﬂowing around some loop. is proportional to the current. having to do with the sizes. The henry. and. This is a rather surprising result.
The magnetic ﬂux though each turn of the loop is B πr 2 = µ0 N I πr2 . The total ﬂux through the solenoid wire. since Φ = L I. the e. of the battery.f. is Φ = N l µ0 N I πr2 .194) Note that the self inductance only depends on geometric quantities such as the number of turns in the solenoid and the area of the coils. Let us connect the ends of the solenoid across the terminals of a battery of e. Thus.195) (4.This result is easily obtained by integrating Amp`re’s law over a rectangular loop e whose long sides run parallel to the axis of the solenoid. By Lenz’s law. The voltage drop across the resistor is simply dΦ dI = −L . What is going to happen? The equivalent circuit is shown below. the self inductance of the solenoid is L= Φ = µ0 N 2 πr2 l. According to Faraday’s law. is such as to oppose the change in the current—i. Suppose that our solenoid has an electrical resistance R. which has N l turns. If this is the case then the above formulae remain valid.. A change in the current implies a change in the magnetic ﬂux linking the solenoid wire. it is a back e.f. We can write V =− where V is the generated e.e. This implies that the typical timescale of the change must be much longer than the time for a light ray to traverse the circuit. one inside the solenoid and the other outside. We have to assume that the change is suﬃciently slow that we can neglect the displacement current and retardation eﬀects in our calculations.m.196) 189 .m. The inductance and resistance of the solenoid are represented by a perfect inductor L and a perfect resistor R connected in series. Suppose that the current I ﬂowing through the solenoid changes. V .m. this change generates an e.f. dt dt (4. I (4.f. The voltage drop across the inductor and resistor is equal to the e. in the coils.m. V .f.m.f. and whose short sides run perpendicular to the axis.m.
I is the current ﬂowing through the solenoid. It follows that V = IR + L dI . dt (4. We can rearrange it to give dI V R = − I. Here.197) This is a diﬀerential equation for the current I. It follows that k = −V /R.f.m. minus the back e.201) R 190 . R (4. when I = 0. Suppose that the battery is connected at time t = 0.L V R I IR.) is L dI/dt.200) It can be seen from the diagram that after the battery is connected the current ramps up and attains its steady state value V /R (which comes from Ohm’s law) on the characteristic timescale L τ= . R (4. (4. dt L L The general solution is I(t) = V + k exp(−R t/L). so that I(t) = V (1 − exp(−R t/L) ) ..198) The constant k is ﬁxed by the boundary conditions. whereas the voltage drop across the inductor (i.e.199) (4.
f.V/R > I 0 0 L/R t > This timescale is sometimes called the “time constant” of the circuit. and we want to use it to send an electric signal down a wire (or transmission line).m. have some characteristic L/R time. Suppose that we possess a fancy power supply. somewhat unimaginatively. If the current were to rise instantaneously then extremely large electric ﬁelds would be generated by the sudden jump in the magnetic ﬁeld. so all have a ﬁnite L/R time. leading. This eﬀect is sometimes advantageous. to breakdown and electric arcing. as well as some resistance. So. the rise is spread out over the L/R time of the circuit. We can now appreciate the signiﬁcance of self inductance. as the current tries to change. eﬀectively prevents the current from rising (or falling) much faster than the L/R time. Since the current in the line cannot rise or fall faster than the L/R time. and will. or. but often it is a great nuisance. All circuit elements possess some self inductance. This means that when we power up a circuit the current does not jump up instantaneously to its steady state value. Instead. Of course. the wire or transmission line will possess both resistance and inductance. therefore. The typical 191 . the leading and trailing edges of the signal get smoothed out over an L/R time. generated in an inductor. The back e. the “L/R time” of the circuit. Suppose that we try to send a square wave signal down the line. This is a good thing. Self inductance can also be a bad thing. inevitably. if there were no such thing as self inductance then every time you switched an electric circuit on or oﬀ there would be a big blue ﬂash due to arcing between conductors.
and the common radius is r. Recall that the self inductance of the bottom coil is L1 = µ0 N1 2 πr2 l. Suppose that the bottom coil has N1 turns per unit length and carries a current I1 . so that the signal from the power supply can be transmitted to some load device without serious distortion. deﬁned Φ2 = M I1 . two long thin solenoids. there is little point having a fancy power supply unless you also possess a low inductance wire or transmission line. V 0 V 0 τ Consider.203) (4. (4. The length of each solenoid is l. It follows that the mutual inductance of the two coils.diﬀerence between the signal fed into the wire (upper trace) and that which comes out of the other end (lower trace) is illustrated in the diagram below. The magnetic ﬂux passing through each turn of the top coil is µ 0 N1 I1 πr2 . Clearly. and that of the top coil is L2 = µ0 N2 2 πr2 l. one wound on top of the other. is given by M = µ0 N1 N2 πr2 l. where N2 is the number of turns per unit length in the top coil. and the total ﬂux linking the top coil is therefore Φ2 = N2 l µ0 N1 I1 πr2 .202) 192 .204) (4. now.
Hence. (4. the circuit equation for the top coil is V2 = R 2 I 2 + L 2 dI2 dI1 +M . V2 is the total voltage drop across the top coil. Thus. induced in the bottom coil is dI2 . some of the ﬂux “leaks” out.207) Thus.209) V1 = R 1 I 1 + L 1 dt dt Likewise.m. The voltage drop due to the back e.f. (4. 193 . due to the inductive coupling to the top coil. the circuit equation for the bottom coil is dI2 dI1 +M . (4. then the voltage drop due to its resistance is I1 R. We know that the ﬂux through the bottom coil due to the instantaneous current I 2 ﬂowing in the top coil is Φ1 = M I 2 . We can write M = k L 1 L2 .206) where the constant k is called the “coeﬃcient of coupling” and lies in the range 0 ≤ k ≤ 1.m. by Faraday’s law and Lenz’s law the back e.205) Note that this result depends on the assumption that all of the ﬂux produced by one coil passes through the other coil. If the bottom coil has an instantaneous current I1 ﬂowing through it and a total voltage drop V1 .208) V = −M dt The voltage drop across the bottom coil due to its mutual inductance with the top coil is minus this expression.f. dt dt (4. (4.m. In reality. the mutual inductance can be written M= L 1 L2 . generated by the self inductance of the coil is L1 dI1 /dt. (4. There is also a back e.f.210) Here. Suppose that the two coils have resistances R1 and R2 . so that the mutual inductance is somewhat less than that given in the above formula.
this is discontinuous at t = 0 (which is clearly unphysical)? The crucial point. (4. the circuit equation for the bottom coil is dI1 .206) that V2 = V 1 k Since L1. We have already seen the solution to this equation: V1 (1 − exp(−R1 t/L1 ) ) . so there is no discontinuity in the current (and. 2 ∝ N1.216) L2 exp(−R1 t/L1 ).Suppose that we suddenly connect a battery of e. L1 (4. or connected to a voltmeter of very high internal resistance. But. what about the displacement current.212) I1 = R1 The circuit equation for the top coil is V2 = M giving V2 = V 1 It follows from Eq. dt (4. so it does not make much sense to start worrying about it now. is that we have speciﬁcally neglected the displacement current in all of our previous analysis. L1 (4.m.22 .f.215) dI1 .213) M exp(−R1 t/L1 ). generated in the top coil? Since I2 = 0. so that I 2 = 0.211) V1 = R 1 I 1 + L 1 dt where V1 is constant.f. which is proportional to ∂E/∂t? Surely. and I1 (t = 0) = 0. What is the e. This is not a problem since the resistance of the top circuit is inﬁnite. (4. N1 (4. (4.214) Note that V2 (t) is discontinuous at t = 0. The top coil is assumed to be open circuited. in the magnetic ﬁeld). at 194 . V 1 to the bottom coil at time t = 0. here. hence. we obtain V2 = V 1 k N2 exp(−R1 t/L1 ).m. If we had retained the displacement current in our calculations we would ﬁnd that the voltage in the top circuit jumps up.
is typically 12 volts). The primary circuit is connected to the car battery (whose e. so that the ratio N 2 /N1 is made as large as possible. this is not the case. A large voltage spike is induced in a secondary circuit (connected to a coil with very many turns) whenever the current in a primary circuit (connected to a coil with not so many turns) is either switched on or oﬀ. V1 N1 (4. This means that the coeﬃcient of coupling k is small.m.e. which reduces the voltage 195 .217) so if N2 N1 the voltage in the bottom circuit is considerably ampliﬁed in the top circuit. However. V2 (t = 0) N2 =k .. The switching is done by a set of points which are mechanically opened and closed as the engine turns. You might think that the optimum conﬁguration is to have only one turn in the primary circuit and lots of turns in the secondary circuit. but the displacement current remains ﬁnite). Now. The large voltage spike induced in the secondary circuit as the points are either opened or closed causes a spark to jump across a gap in this circuit.> V 2 0 L1 / R1 t > t = 0. Most of the magnetic ﬁeld lines generated by a single turn primary coil are likely to miss the secondary coil altogether. the jump is instantaneous to all intents and purposes. This spark ignites a petrol/air mixture in one of the cylinders. on a timescale similar to the light traverse time across the circuit (i.f. This eﬀect is the basis for oldfashioned car ignition systems.
induced in the secondary circuit. Thus, you need a reasonable number of turns in the primary coil in order to localize the induced magnetic ﬁeld so that it links eﬀectively with the secondary coil.
4.12
Magnetic energy
Suppose that at t = 0 a coil of inductance L and resistance R is connected across the terminals of a battery of e.m.f. V . The circuit equation is V =L dI + RI. dt (4.218)
The power output of the battery is V I. [Every charge q that goes around the circuit falls through a potential diﬀerence qV . In order to raise it back to the starting potential, so that it can perform another circuit, the battery must do work qV . The work done per unit time (i.e., the power) is nqV , where n is the number of charges per unit time passing a given point on the circuit. But, I = nq, so the power output is V I.] The total work done by the battery in raising the current in the circuit from zero at time t = 0 to IT at time t = T is
T
W =
0
V I dt.
(4.219)
Using the circuit equation (4.218), we obtain
T
W =L
0
dI I dt + R dt
T
T
I 2 dt,
0
(4.220)
giving 1 W = LIT2 + R 2
0
I 2 dt.
(4.221)
The second term on the righthand side represents the irreversible conversion of electrical energy into heat energy in the resistor. The ﬁrst term is the amount of energy stored in the inductor at time T . This energy can be recovered after the inductor is disconnected from the battery. Suppose that the battery is 196
disconnected at time T . The circuit equation is now 0=L giving I = IT exp − R (t − T ) L , (4.223) dI + RI, dt (4.222)
where we have made use of the boundary condition I(T ) = I T . Thus, the current decays away exponentially. The energy stored in the inductor is dissipated as heat in the resistor. The total heat energy appearing in the resistor after the battery is disconnected is
∞
I 2 R dt =
T
1 LIT2 , 2
(4.224)
where use has been made of Eq. (4.223). Thus, the heat energy appearing in the resistor is equal to the energy stored in the inductor. This energy is actually stored in the magnetic ﬁeld generated around the inductor. Consider, again, our circuit with two coils wound on top of one another. Suppose that each coil is connected to its own battery. The circuit equations are V1 V2 dI2 dI1 +M , dt dt dI2 dI1 = R2 I2 + L +M , dt dt = R1 I1 + L
(4.225)
where V1 is the e.m.f. of the battery in the ﬁrst circuit, etc. The work done by the two batteries in increasing the currents in the two circuits from zero at time 0 to I1 and I2 at time T , respectively, is
T
W
=
0 T
(V1 I1 + V2 I2 ) dt 1 1 (R1 I12 + R2 I22 ) dt + L1 I12 + L2 I22 2 2
T
=
0
+M
0
I1
dI2 dI1 + I2 dt dt 197
dt.
(4.226)
Thus,
T
W
=
0
(R1 I12 + R2 I22 ) dt 1 1 + L1 I1 2 + L2 I2 2 + M I 1 I2 . 2 2 (4.227)
Clearly, the total magnetic energy stored in the two coils is WB = 1 1 L1 I1 2 + L2 I2 2 + M I 1 I2 . 2 2 (4.228)
Note that the mutual inductance term increases the stored magnetic energy if I1 and I2 are of the same sign—i.e., if the currents in the two coils ﬂow in the same direction, so that they generate magnetic ﬁelds which reinforce one another. Conversely, the mutual inductance term decreases the stored magnetic energy if I1 and I2 are of the opposite sign. The total stored energy can never be negative, otherwise the coils would constitute a power source (a negative stored energy is equivalent to a positive generated energy). Thus, 1 1 L1 I12 + L2 I22 + M I1 I2 ≥ 0, 2 2 which can be written 1 2
2
(4.229)
L 1 I1 +
L 2 I2
− I1 I2 ( L1 L2 − M ) ≥ 0,
(4.230)
assuming that I1 I2 < 0. It follows that M≤ L 1 L2 . (4.231)
The equality sign corresponds to the situation where all of the ﬂux generated by one coil passes through the other. If some of the ﬂux misses then the inequality sign is appropriate. In fact, the above formula is valid for any two inductively coupled circuits. We intimated previously that the energy stored in an inductor is actually stored in the surrounding magnetic ﬁeld. Let us now obtain an explicit formula 198
for the energy stored in a magnetic ﬁeld. Consider an ideal solenoid. The energy stored in the solenoid when a current I ﬂows through it is W = 1 2 LI , 2 (4.232)
where L is the self inductance. We know that L = µ0 N 2 πr2 l, (4.233)
where N is the number of turns per unit length of the solenoid, r the radius, and l the length. The ﬁeld inside the solenoid is uniform, with magnitude B = µ0 N I, and is zero outside the solenoid. Equation (4.232) can be rewritten B2 W = V, 2µ0 (4.235) (4.234)
where V = πr 2 l is the volume of the solenoid. The above formula strongly suggests that a magnetic ﬁeld possesses an energy density B2 . U= 2µ0 (4.236)
Let us now examine a more general proof of the above formula. Consider a system of N circuits (labeled i = 1 to N ), each carrying a current I i . The magnetic ﬂux through the ith circuit is written [cf., Eq. (4.186) ] Φi = B · dSi = A · dli , (4.237)
where B = ∧ A, and dSi and dli denote a surface element and a line element of this circuit, respectively. The back e.m.f. induced in the ith circuit follows from Faraday’s law: dΦi Vi = − . (4.238) dt 199
T t dt.243) giving 1 W = 2 N I0 i Φ0 i .240) The above expression for the work done is.f.244) So. T (4. if instantaneous currents Ii ﬂow in the the N circuits. Suppose.239) Pi = I i dt Thus. so that Ii = I 0 i t . so they must also ramp up linearly: Φi = Φ 0 i It follows that W = i=1 0 N T t .242) I0 i Φ0 i (4. that the currents are ramped up linearly. then the instantaneous stored energy is 1 W = 2 N Ii Φi . of course.m. i=1 (4. equivalent to the total energy stored in the magnetic ﬁeld surrounding the various circuits. is dΦi . which link instantaneous ﬂuxes Φi . (4. for the sake of simplicity.241) The ﬂuxes are proportional to the currents.The rate of work of the battery which maintains the current I i in the ith circuit against this back e. the total work required to raise the currents in the N circuits from zero at time 0 to I0 i at time T is N T W = i=1 0 Ii dΦi dt. i=1 (4.245) 200 . dt (4. T2 (4. This energy is independent of the manner in which the currents are set up.
but ﬁnite. (4. It follows that the surface integral is negligible in the limit r → ∞. Note that for an element of the ith circuit j = Ii dli /dli Ai and dV = dli Ai . 2µ0 (4. V (4. (4. at this stage.245) imply that 1 W = 2 N Ii i=1 A · dli .251) where S is the bounding surface of V . µ0 j = ∧B (we are neglecting the displacement current in this calculation). where Ai is the crosssectional area of the circuit. the area of surface S only increases like r 2 . (4.248) ∧A−A· ∧ B. Thus.252) 201 .Equations (4. (4. we obtain 1 2µ0 ∧ A) dV.247) 2 V where V is a volume which contains all of the circuits.246) transforms to 1 W = A · j dV. · (A ∧ B) = B · which implies that W = 1 2µ0 (− V 1 2µ0 V A· ∧ B dV.246) It is convenient. so W = According to vector ﬁeld theory. Equation (4. (4. crosssectional area.237) and (4.250) Using Gauss’ theorem and B = W =− 1 2µ0 S A ∧ B · dS + B 2 dV. to replace our N line currents by N current distributions of small. Let us take this surface to inﬁnity. However.249) · (A ∧ B) + B · ∧ A. the above expression reduces to W = all space B2 dV. It is easily demonstrated that the magnetic ﬁeld generated by a current loop falls of like r −3 at large distances. Now. The vector potential falls oﬀ like r −2 .
Since this expression is valid for any magnetic ﬁeld whatsoever. 2 whereas the energy density of a magnetic ﬁeld satisﬁes UE = 0 (4.13 Energy conservation in electromagnetism We have seen that the energy density of an electric ﬁeld is given by E2 . 2µ0 (4.258) In other words.259) 202 .254) B2 UB = .253) 4. 2 2µ0 (4. This suggests that an energy conservation law for electromagnetism should have the form − ∂ ∂t U dV = V S u · dS.256) We are now in a position to demonstrate that the classical theory of electromagnetism conserves energy. we obtain − ∂ ∂t ρ dV = V S j · dS. (4. we can conclude that the energy density of a general magnetic ﬁeld is given by U= B2 .255) This suggests that the energy density of a general electromagnetic ﬁeld is U= 0 (4. 2µ0 E2 B2 + . (4. the rate of decrease of the charge contained in volume V equals the net ﬂux of charge across surface S.257) ∂t This is the equation of charge conservation. We have already come across one conservation law in electromagnetism: ∂ρ + · j = 0. Integrating over some volume V bounded by a surface S. (4.
We start from Amp`re’s law (including the displacement current): e ∧ B = µ0 j + E· ∧B 0 µ0 ∂E .259) is incomplete because electromagnetic ﬁelds can lose or gain energy by interacting with matter. We need to factor this into our analysis.261) Let us now see if we can derive an expression of this form from Maxwell’s equations. from vector ﬁeld theory · (E ∧ B) = B · 203 ∧E−E· ∧ B. (4. energy u per unit time.262) Dotting this equation with the electric ﬁeld yields −E · j = − This can be rewritten −E · j = − Now. Thus. Eq. We saw earlier (see Section 4.259) generalizes to − ∂ ∂t U dV = V S u · dS + V E · j dV.263) . (4.2) that the rate of heat dissipation per unit volume in a conductor (the socalled ohmic heating rate) is E · j. (4. (4. passes a given point in the direction of u). This energy is extracted from electromagnetic ﬁelds.260) The above equation is equivalent to ∂U + ∂t · u = −E · j.. U is the energy density of the electromagnetic ﬁeld and u is the ﬂux of electromagnetic energy (i. per unit crosssectional area. ∂t ∂E . the rate of decrease of the electromagnetic energy in volume V equals the net ﬂux of electromagnetic energy across surface S.e.265) E· µ0 ∧B ∂ + ∂t 0 µ0 + 0E · (4.Here. so the rate of energy loss of the ﬁelds in volume V due to interaction with matter is V E · j dV . Equation (4.264) . According to the above equation. (4. ∂t E2 2 (4.
and u= E∧B µ0 (4.so −E · j = Faraday’s law yields E∧B · µ0 − B· µ0 ∧E ∂ + ∂t 0 E2 2 .270) (4.266) ∧E =− so −E · j = This can be rewritten −E · j = E∧B · µ0 · E∧B µ0 + ∂B .267) E2 2 . Furthermore. So. E2 B2 + 2 2µ0 (4. ∂t 0 (4. 204 .272) is the electromagnetic energy ﬂux. (4.271) is the electromagnetic energy density. We all know that if we stand in the sun we get hot (especially in Texas!). (4. The latter quantity is usually called the “Poynting ﬂux” after its discoverer. radiation must transport energy. Let us see whether our expression for the electromagnetic energy ﬂux makes sense. The electric and magnetic ﬁelds in electromagnetic radiation are mutually perpendicular. we obtain the desired conservation law.268) 1 ∂B ∂ B· + µ0 ∂t ∂t ∂ + ∂t 0 E2 B2 + 2 2µ0 .269) Thus. and are also perpendicular to ˆ the direction of propagation k (this is a unit vector). ∂U + ∂t where U= 0 · u = −E · j. B = E/c. (4. This occurs because we absorb electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Sun.
273) Thus. (4.Equation (3. and is then absorbed at the other end.e. Suppose that we have a railroad car of mass M and length L which is free to move in one dimension.. (4. Note that the electric and magnetic ﬁelds have equal energy densities. u = cU = which is in accordance with Eq.276) 4. (4. which seems to make sense. propagates along the length of the car. we would expect the energy ﬂux through one square meter in one second to equal the energy contained in a volume of length c and unit crosssectional area. the Poynting ﬂux for electromagnetic radiation is E2 ˆ u= k= µ0 c 0 cE 2 ˆ k. c times the energy density. The eﬀective mass of this radiation is m = E/c 2 205 . due to Einstein. Thus.232) can easily be transformed into the following relation between the electric and magnetic ﬁelds of an electromagnetic wave: E∧B = E2 ˆ k. (4.14 Electromagnetic momentum We have seen that electromagnetic waves carry energy. i. Since electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light. It turns out that they also carry momentum.275) using B = E/c. Suppose that electromagnetic radiation of total energy E is emitted from one end of the car. The energy density of electromagnetic radiation is U= 0 B2 E2 + = 2 2µ0 0 E2 E2 + = 2 2µ0 c2 0E 2 . c (4.274). Consider the following argument. 0 cE 2 .274) This expression tells us that electromagnetic waves transport energy along their direction of propagation.
When the radiation hits the other end of the car then it acquires mo206 .277) M in this derivation. At ﬁrst sight.L E M E x (from Einstein’s famous relation E = mc2 ). the process described above appears to cause the centre of mass of the system to spontaneously shift. In fact. what actually causes the car to move? If the radiation possesses momentum p then the car will recoil with the same momentum as the radiation is emitted. This violates the law of momentum conservation (assuming the railway car is subject to no external forces). The only way in which the centre of mass of the system can remain stationary is if the railway car moves in the opposite direction to the direction of propagation of the radiation. But. c2 (4. if the car moves by a distance x then the centre of mass of the system is the same before and after the radiation pulse provided that M x = mL = It is assumed that m E L.
the momentum density equals the energy ﬂux over c2 . (4. the distance traveled by a mass M with momentum p in this time is p L . momentum p. the momentum carried by electromagnetic radiation equals its energy divided by the speed of light. Of course.283) Thus.280) relating the energy E. The time of ﬂight of the radiation is L/c. of the momentum per unit volume) of electromagnetic radiation is g= u . So. (4. so the vector momentum density (which gives the direction as well as the magnitude. and momentum density of electromagnetic radiation are also rapidly 207 . E p= (4. the electric ﬁeld associated with an electromagnetic wave oscillates rapidly.282) It is reasonable to suppose that the momentum points along the direction of the energy ﬂow (this is obviously the case for photons).mentum p in the opposite direction.281) c for individual photons. which implies that the previous expressions for the energy density. which stops the motion. and mass m of a particle. (4. so u U = 2 = g= c c 0E 2 c . (4.278) x = vt = M c giving c E p = Mx = . According to quantum theory. energy ﬂux. electromagnetic radiation is made up of massless particles called photons. The same result can be obtained from the well known relativistic formula E 2 = p2 c2 + m 2 c4 (4. Thus.281) that the momentum density g of electromagnetic radiation equals its energy density over c.279) L c Thus. c2 (4. If follows from Eq. so the same must be true of electromagnetic radiation as a whole.
is equivalent to a pressure. Suppose that a body is placed in a beam of perfectly collimated radiation. the “radiation pressure” is given by 2 0E p= = U . is simply the amount of momentum contained in a volume of length c and unit crosssectional area. The amount of momentum absorbed per unit time. is proportional to cos θ.284) where the factor 1/2 comes from averaging cos2 ωt. the pressure exerted on the wall is the same as in Eq. Thus. Moreover. Here. In other words.285). Consider a cavity ﬁlled with electromagnetic radiation. U u g = = = . 2c c 2 0 E0 (4.oscillating. per unit crosssectional area. E0 is the peak amplitude of the electric ﬁeld associated with the wave. 2 2 U ˆ 0 E0 ˆ k= k. An absorbed momentum per unit time. Since electromagnetic radiation possesses momentum then it must exert a force on bodies which absorb (or emit) radiation. Thus. per unit area. Thus.. i. the pressure exerted by collimated electromagnetic radiation is equal to its average energy density.e. 2 c 0 E02 ˆ = c U k. What is the radiation pressure exerted on the walls? In this situation the radiation propagates in all directions with equal probability. (4. which it absorbs completely. The amount of such radiation hitting the wall per unit time. the component of momentum normal to the wall which the radiation carries is also proportional to cos θ. Consider radiation propagating at an angle θ to the local normal to the wall. per unit area. (4. It is convenient to average over many periods of the oscillation (this average is denoted ). c times the momentum density g. the radiation exerts a pressure cg on the body. except that it is weighted by the average of cos2 θ over all solid angles in order to take into account the fact that obliquely propagating radiation exerts a pressure 208 .285) 2 So.
The average of cos 2 θ over all solid angles is 1/3. One (called the “gas tail”) consists of ionized gas. the NOVA experiment in Laurence Livermore National Laboratory) typically have energy ﬂuxes of 1018 Wm−2 . It is quite common for comets to exhibit two separate tails.which is cos2 θ times that of normal radiation. (4. However. what is the radiation pressure? Since. Obviously. u = c U = 1300 Wm−2 . since it is responsible for continuously sweeping dust particles out of the solar system. Two separate tails are observed if the local direction of the solar wind is not radially outward from the Sun (which is quite often the case). the radiation pressure exerted on the Earth is minuscule (one atmosphere equals about 10 5 N/m2 ). The other (called the “dust tail”) consists of uncharged dust particles. and is swept radially outward from the Sun by radiation pressure. that produced by laser beams can be enormous (far higher than any conventional pressure which has ever been produced in a laboratory).286) Clearly. 3 (4. The power incident on the surface of the Earth due to radiation emitted by the Sun is about 1300 W/m2 . The radiation pressure from sunlight is very weak. the radiation is assumed to be perfectly collimated. then p= U 4 × 10−6 Nm−2 . Nevertheless.287) 209 ..g. it would not be a good idea to get in the way of one of these lasers! (4. the lasers used in Inertial Conﬁnement Fusion (e. and is swept along by the solar wind (a stream of charged particles and magnetic ﬁeld lines emitted by the Sun). the pressure exerted by isotropic radiation is one third of its average energy density. Thus. this small pressure due to radiation is important in outer space.288) Here. For instance. This translates to a radiation pressure of about 104 atmospheres. so for isotropic radiation p= U . So.
so the charge on the other conductor is −q.4. ˆ r − z z (4. t − r − r /c) d3 r ˆ ˆ by I(r .293) . t − r − r /c) dz z. For a wire of negligible thickness we can replace j(r . t − r − r /c).289) We expect the oscillating current ﬂowing in the wire connecting the two spheres to generate electromagnetic radiation (see Section 3. (4. Suppose that electric charge ﬂows periodically back and forth between the spheres. after the German physicist Heinrich Hertz. t) = Az (r. (4. A(r. t − r − z z/c) dz . Let q(t) = q0 sin ωt. It follows that I(t) = dq = I0 cos ωt. If this is the case then the current I ﬂowing between the conductors has the same phase along the whole length of the wire. t) z and µ0 Az (r. Let us consider the simple case where the length of the wire is small compared to the wavelength of the emitted radiation.294) l/2 −l/2 µ0 4π [j] d3 r . Thus.292) Suppose that the wire is aligned along the zaxis and extends from z = −l/2 to z = l/2. The system has zero net charge. t) = 4π In the region r l ˆ r − z z 210 r (4. The magnetic vector potential generated by a current distribution j(r) is given by the well known formula A(r. dt (4. t) = where [f ] = f (r .23).290) where I0 = ωq0 .15 The Hertzian dipole Consider two spherical conductors connected by a wire. This type of antenna is called a Hertzian dipole.291) ˆ I(z . Let q be the charge on one of the conductors. r − r  (4.
respectively. 211 . This error (which is a time) must be much less than a period of oscillation of the emitted radiation. So l 2π . Eqs. we can write Az (r. t) l z I(t − r/c) . (4. otherwise the phase of the radiation will be wrong.299) · A = − 0 µ0 . where λ = 2π c/ω is the wavelength of the emitted radiation. we can evaluate the associated electric and magnetic ﬁelds using E = − ∂A − ∂t φ. Thus. So. 4π 0 c r r (4.300) ∂z 4π ∂t r c r2 to leading order in r −1 . (4. we have already assumed that the length of the wire l is much less than the wavelength of the radiation. (4. so the above inequality is automatically satisﬁed. t − r/c) dz . r λ. t) .298) and (4. ∂Az µ0 l ∂I(t − r/c) z 1 ·A= − 2 +O (4.and The maximum error in the latter approximation is ∆t ∼ l/c. φ(r. ∂t Now.295) I(z . However.298) 4π r The scalar potential is most conveniently evaluated using the Lorentz gauge condition ∂φ (4. r (4.301) Given the vector and scalar potentials. (4. t) µ0 4π l/2 −l/2 ˆ t − r − z z/c t − r/c. Thus. in the “far ﬁeld” region.301).296) c ω which implies that l λ. µ0 l I(t − r/c) Az (r.297) This integral is easy to perform since the current is uniform along the length of the wire.
r2 (4.302) Note that we are only interested in radiation ﬁelds. The average power crossing a spherical surface S (whose radius is much greater than λ) is Prad = S u · dS. φ) are standard spherical polar coordinates aligned along the zaxis... which fall oﬀ like r −1 with increasing distance from the source. (4. sin θ 3 4π 0 c r (4..320) and (3. θ = π/2).321). and the maximum emission is in the plane perpendicular to this axis (i. 32π 2 0 c3 r2 (4.308) 212 . θ. r λ) electromagnetic ﬁelds generated by a localized oscillating current are also easily derived from Eqs. There is no radiation along the axis of the oscillating dipole (i.e.e.e.305) where the average is over a single period of oscillation of the wave. It is easily demonstrated that E and B − − sin[ω(t − r/c)] ˆ ωlI0 θ sin θ 2 4π 0 c r (4. (r. Note that the ﬁelds are symmetric in the azimuthal angle φ.303) ωlI0 sin[ω(t − r/c)] ˆ φ. The total power ﬂux across S is given by Prad ω 2 l 2 I0 2 = 32π 2 0 c3 2π π dφ 0 0 sin2 θ 2 2 r sin θ dθ. (3. and the Poynting ﬂux is given by E∧B ω 2 l 2 I0 2 sin2 θ 2 ˆ u= = sin [ω(t − r/c)] 2 r . θ = 0). µ0 16π 2 0 c3 r It follows that ω 2 l2 I02 sin2 θ ˆ u = r. (4.307) Note that the energy ﬂux is radially outwards from the source. The above expressions for the far ﬁeld (i.306) (4.304) Here.B = ∧ A.
12π 0 c3 (4. I02 /2 2 (4. it is necessary to have l ∼ λ in order to obtain an eﬃcient antenna. the radiated power is swamped by the ohmic losses. (4. (4.311) . Rrad = 789 l λ 2 ohms.309) The total ﬂux is independent of the radius of S..312) where λ = 2π c/ω is the wavelength of the radiation. 2 0 (4.313) is only valid for l λ. Note that the formula (4. i. antennas are conventionally represented as resistors whose resistance is equal to the characteristic radiation resistance of the antenna plus its real resistance. This suggests that Rrad R for most Hertzian dipole antennas. Prad = ω 2 l 2 I0 2 . The power loss I02 Rrad /2 associated with the radiation resistance is due to the emission of electromagnetic radiation. In fact. The power loss I02 R/2 associated with the real resistance is due to ohmic heating of the antenna.313) In the theory of electrical circuits. Thus. antennas whose lengths are much less than that of the emitted radiation tend to be extremely ineﬃcient. The simplest practical antenna 213 . Recall that for a resistor of resistance R the average ohmic heating power is Pheat = I 2 R = 1 2 I R.Thus. In fact.e. It is convenient to deﬁne the “radiation resistance” of a Hertzian dipole antenna: Rrad = so that Rrad 2π = 3 0c l λ Prad .310) assuming that I = I0 cos ωt. as is to be expected if energy is conserved.
2(Rrad + Rload )2 (4. this process is equivalent to the emission of electromagnetic waves by the antenna viewed in reverse.316) Rload V0 2 = . a Hertzian dipole antenna is unable to detect radiation incident along its axis. The power input to the circuit is V0 2 Pin = V I = .317) 214 . each slightly out of phase with its neighbours. Let us represent the detector circuit as a single load resistor Rload connected in series with the antenna. Thus.f.” for which l = λ/2.315) where I = I0 cos ωt is the current induced in the circuit. The resistor. represents the power reradiated by the antenna (here. (4. The incoming wave induces a voltage in the antenna which can be detected in an electrical circuit connected to the antenna.. The characteristic radiation resistance of a halfwave antenna is 2. the real resistance of the antenna is neglected). It is easily demonstrated that antennas most readily detect electromagnetic radiation incident from those directions in which they preferentially emit radiation. a receiving antenna is represented as an e. The e. V0 cos ωt. and most eﬃciently detects radiation incident in the plane perpendicular to this axis.44 = 73 ohms. In fact.is the “halfwave antenna. represents the voltage induced in the antenna by the incoming wave. In the theory of electrical circuits.314) Rrad = 4π 0 c Antennas can be used to receive electromagnetic radiation. (4. 2(Rrad + Rload ) The power transferred to the load is Pload = I Rload 2 (4. Rrad . The question is: how can we choose Rload so that the maximum power is extracted from the wave and transmitted to the load resistor? According to Ohm’s law: V0 cos ωt = I0 cos ωt (Rrad + Rload ).f in series with a resistor.m.m. This can be analyzed as a series of Hertzian dipole antennas stacked on top of one another.
The power reradiated by the antenna is Prad = I Rrad 2 Rrad V0 2 = . We have also assumed that the antenna is properly aligned (i. Pload = Prad = Pin V0 2 = . For this optimum case.322) Here. For a Hertzian dipole antenna interacting with an incoming wave whose electric ﬁeld has an amplitude E0 we expect V0 = E0 l. 8Rrad 2 (4. The Poynting ﬂux of the incoming wave is uin = 2 0 cE0 2 .321) So. an antenna which is receiving electromagnetic radiation is also emitting it.319) ∂Rload 2 (Rrad + Rload )3 Thus.320) In other words.e. This is how the BBC catch people who do not pay their television license fee in England. the radiation is incident perpendicular to the axis of the antenna). (4. the resistance of the load circuit must match the radiation resistance of the antenna.. (4. Clearly. in the optimum case half of the power absorbed by the antenna is immediately reradiated.318) Note that Pin = Pload + Prad . They have vans which can detect the radiation emitted by a TV aerial whilst it is in use (they can even tell which channel you are watching!). The maximum power transfer to the load occurs when V0 2 Rload − Rrad ∂Pload = = 0. we have used the fact that the wavelength of the radiation is much longer than the length of the antenna. (4.323) 215 . 2(Rrad + Rload )2 (4. the maximum transfer rate corresponds to Rload = Rres . (4.
m. This implies that Pload = uin Aeﬀ . Resistors satisfy Ohm’s law: V = IR. Pload giving l2 3 2 Aeﬀ = = λ . as far as its absorption of incoming electromagnetic radiation is concerned.f. which is essentially one dimensional with length λ/2.324) Consider an idealized antenna in which all incoming radiation incident on some area Aeﬀ is absorbed and then magically transferred to the detector circuit with no reradiation. and capacitors. acts as if it is two dimensional. resistors. (4.327) 4 0 cRrad 8π It is clear that the eﬀective area of a Hertzian dipole antenna is of order the wavelength squared of the incoming radiation. (4. Suppose that the power absorbed from the idealized antenna matches that absorbed from the real antenna. (4. the antenna.328) E02 l2 = = 8Rrad 2 0 cE0 2 Aeﬀ . (4. with width 0.325) The quantity Aeﬀ is called the “eﬀective area” of the antenna. Thus. it is the area of the idealized antenna which absorbs as much net power from the incoming wave as the actual antenna.329) 216 .16 AC circuits Alternating current (AC) circuits are made up of e. 4.whereas the power transferred to a properly matched detector circuit is Pload E02 l2 = . 8Rrad (4. sources and three diﬀerent types of passive element. inductors.26 λ.13 λ2 . (4.326) Thus. For a properly aligned halfwave antenna Aeﬀ = 0.
so that V (t) = V0 exp(i ωt). Equations (4. source V .333) yield V0 exp(i ωt) = I0 exp(i ωt) R + L i ω I0 exp(i ωt) + 217 I0 exp(i ωt) .332) and (4. (4. which consists of an inductor L. The assumed behaviour of the voltage and current is clearly relevant to electrical circuits powered by the mains voltage (which oscillates at 60 hertz). inductors. Suppose. Let us consider the classic LCR circuit. Thus. capacitors obey q = V = C t I dt 0 C.f. Note that any passive component of a real electrical circuit can always be represented as a combination of ideal resistors. is quite tricky to solve.332) This is an integrodiﬀerential equation which.333) where the physical solution is understood to be the real part of the above expressions. Finally. in general. and capacitors. a capacitor C. (4. all connected in series with an e. that both the voltage and the current oscillate at some angular frequency ω. dI V = IR + L + dt t I dt 0 C. i ωC (4. (4. The circuit equation is obtained by setting the input voltage V equal to the sum of the voltage drops across the three passive elements in the circuit. I is the current ﬂowing through the resistor.334) . I(t) = I0 exp(i ωt).m. Inductors satisfy dL . (4.where R is the resistance.330) V =L dt where L is the inductance. and I = 0 for t < 0. q is the charge stored on the plate with the more positive potential. and V is the voltage drop across the resistor (in the direction in which the current ﬂows). and a resistor R. however.331) where C is the capacitance.
336) Impedance is a generalization of the concept of resistance. (4. ωt=2π (4. ﬁrst of all.f. Z= V 1 = i ωL + + R.339) = V 0 I0 ωt=0 cos ωt (cos ωt cos θ + sin ωt sin θ) giving 1 V0 I0 cos θ. I i ωC (4. calculate the power using real (rather than complex) voltages and currents. 218 (4. the impedance of an AC circuit is a complex quantity. source is P = V (t)I(t) .340) 2 since cos ωt sin ωt = 0 and cos ωt cos ωt = 1/2. The average power output of the e.m. the voltage and the current are written P = V (t) = V0 exp(i ωt).338) where θ is the phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage.giving V0 = I0 i ωL + 1 +R . I(t) = I0 cos(ωt − θ).335) It is helpful to deﬁne the “impedance” of the circuit. (4. i ωC (4. Let us.337) where the average is taken over one period of the oscillation. In general. In complex representation. I(t) = I0 exp[i (ωt − θ)]. 2π (4. It follows that P = V 0 I0 ωt=0 ωt=2π cos ωt cos(ωt − θ) d(ωt) 2π d(ωt) . We can write V (t) = V0 cos ωt.341) .
336). (4. 2 2 Z2 (4. LCR circuits are used in radio tuners to ﬁlter out signals whose frequencies fall outside a given band.344) Note that power dissipation is associated with the real part of the impedance. (4.where I0 and V0 are assumed to be real quantities. we ﬁnd that P = P = 1 1 Re(Z) V 2 Re(Z) I2 = . (4. The phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage is given by θ = arg(Z) = tan−1 ωL − 1/ωC R . but they eventually return it to the circuit without dissipation. 2 It follows that 1 1 (V I ∗ + V ∗ I) = Re(V I ∗ ). For the special case of an LCR circuit.342) (4. the amplitude of the current which ﬂows in an LCR circuit for a given amplitude of the input voltage is given by I0 = V0 = Z V0 (ωL − 1/ωC)2 + R2 . P = 1 RI02 . peaking at ω = 1/ LC. Note that 1 (V I ∗ + V ∗ I) = V0 I0 cos θ.346) √ The response of the circuit is clearly resonant.343) (4. 4 2 Making use of Eq. and √ √ reaching 1/ 2 of the peak value at ω = 1/ LC ± R/2L (assuming that R L/C). 2 (4. The inductor and the capacitor both store energy. (4. According to Eq.345) It is clear that only the resistor dissipates energy in this circuit.347) 219 . In fact.336).
17 Transmission lines The central assumption made in the analysis of conventional AC circuits is that the voltage (and. For instance. It turns out that you need a special sort of wire. Computer networks generally run at about 10 MHz. the current) has the same phase throughout the circuit. This is generally not the case in electrical circuits which are associated with communication. The assumption of a constant phase throughout the circuit is reasonable if the wavelength of the oscillation λ = 2π c/ω is much larger than the dimensions of the circuit. the magnitude of Z gives the ratio of the peak current to the peak voltage. so the constant phase approximation clearly breaks down for long distance calls. The corresponding wavelength is about 5 km. hence. leased telephone lines (the type you attach computers to) run at 56 kHz. and the behaviour of the circuit is summed up by the impedance Z. if the circuit is suﬃciently large and the frequency of oscillation ω is suﬃciently high then this assumption becomes invalid. corresponding to λ ∼ 30 m. The frequencies in such circuits tend to be high and the dimensions are. Thus. almost by deﬁnition. Unfortunately. Suppose that x measures the position along the line. and the argument of Z gives the phase lag of the current with respect to the voltage. It is clear that in conventional AC circuits the circuit equation reduces to a simple algebraic equation. to propagate signals around circuits whose dimensions greatly exceed the wavelength λ. to zero at the resonant frequency (ω = 1/ LC). 220 . which is certainly longer than 30 m. to π/2 for frequencies signiﬁcantly above the resonant frequency. 4. The real part of Z tells us the power dissipated in the circuit. large. The conductors possess a capacitance per unit length C. An idealized transmission line consists of two parallel conductors of uniform crosssectional area. Let us investigate transmission lines.The phase lag varies from −π/2 for frequencies signiﬁcantly below the resonant √ frequency. and an inductance per unit length L. the constant phase approximation also breaks down for the computer network in this building. called a transmission line.
and therefore obeys the wellknown equation ∂I(x. In the limit δx → 0. ∂x2 ∂x∂t 221 (4.349) and (4. the above equation reduces to ∂V ∂I = −L . respectively. the above equation yields ∂I ∂V = −C . t) is the voltage diﬀerence between the two conductors at position x and time t. respectively. we obtain ∂2V ∂2I = −L .348) V (x. t). 0 (4. This small section of the line can be thought of as a conventional capacitor. t) − V (x + δx.” since an old fashioned telegraph line can be thought of as a primitive transmission line (telegraph lines consist of a single wire. t) = C δx V (x. ∂x ∂t (4.350) where t = 0 denotes a time at which the charge stored in either of the conductors in the region x to x + δx is zero. located at positions x and x + δx. and I(x. The capacitance of the portion of the line lying between these two points is C δx. (4. and therefore obeys the wellknown equation t 0 t I(x. The selfinductance of the portion of the line lying between these two points is L δx. t) . (4. ∂x ∂t (4. t) = L δx ∂t where V (x. the other conductor is the Earth. t) dt − I(x + δx.349) Consider the diﬀerence in current between two neighbouring points on the line.351) are generally known as the “telegrapher’s equations. This small section of the line can be thought of as a conventional inductor. In the limit δx → 0.Consider the voltage diﬀerence between two neighbouring points on the line.352) .349) with respect to x. t) ].351) Equations (4. t) is the current ﬂowing in one of the conductors at position x and time t [the current ﬂowing in the other conductor is −I(x. located at positions x and x + δx.) Diﬀerentiating Eq.
356) yield I(x.357) For selfconsistency. ∂x∂t ∂t2 The above two equations can be combined to give ∂2V ∂2V LC = . subject to the above boundary condition. This clearly corresponds to a wave which propagates from the generator towards the resistor.353) √ This is clearly a wave equation with wave velocity v = 1/ LC. (4. L V (l.358) R= I(l. t) = . t) = I(0. An analogous equation can be written for the current I.355) The solution to the wave equation (4. the resistor at the end of the line must have a particular value.356) √ where k = ω LC. (4.354) (4. Consider a transmission line which is connected to a generator at one end (x = 0) and a resistor R at the other (x = l). is V (x.359) 222 . C (4. t) = V0 L/C cos(ωt − kx).351) with respect to t yields ∂2I ∂2V = −C . (4.349) and (4. Equations (4. t) C The socalled “input impedance” of the line is deﬁned Zin = V (0. (4. t) = V0 cos ωt.354). Suppose that the generator outputs a voltage V0 cos ωt. t) L .Diﬀerentiating Eq. (4. ∂t2 ∂x2 (4. If follows that V (0. t) = V0 cos(ωt − kx).
the selfinductance per unit length is L= µ0 Φ = ln(b/a). In fact. which consists of two coaxial cylindrical conductors of radii a and b (with b > a). (4. The power loss due to this eﬀective resistor corresponds to power which is extracted from the circuit. According to Amp`re’s law. 2π (4. the transmission line could be replaced by an eﬀective resistor R = Z in in the circuit diagram for the generator circuit. and absorbed by the terminating resistor.364) Not surprisingly. I 2π 1 1 =√ = c. We have already shown that the capacitance per unit length of such a cable is (see Section 4. LC 0 µ0 (4.365) 223 . a transmission line terminated by a resistor R = L/R acts very much like a conventional resistor R = Zin in the circuit containing the generator.363) The speed of propagation of a wave down a coaxial cable is v=√ (4. the magnetic ﬁeld in e the region between the conductors is given by Bθ = µ0 I .360) ln(b/a) Let us now calculate the inductance per unit length.361) The ﬂux linking unit length of the cable is b Φ= a Bθ dr = µ0 I ln(b/a). 2πr (4. The most commonly occurring type of transmission line is a coaxial cable.5) 2π 0 C= . the wave (which is a type of electromagnetic wave) propagates at the speed of light. (4. The impedance of the cable is given by Z0 = L = C µ0 4π 2 0 1/2 ln (b/a) = 60 ln (b/a) ohms. Suppose that the inner conductor carries a current I.362) Thus.Thus. transmitted down the line.
and the input impedance of the line is Z0 . V (0. I(−l. (4.369) (4.e. then there is no reﬂection (i. t) = R..368) The input impedance of the line is given by Zin = R cos kl + i Z0 sin kl V (−l. Let us consider a solution V (x. t) This yields an expression for the coeﬃcient of reﬂection. It is easily demonstrated from the telegrapher’s equations that the corresponding current waveform is I(x. (4. so that R = 0. if the resistor at the end of the line is properly matched. from Ohm’s law. at the end of the line.e. R + Z0 (4. Z0 Z0 (4. Suppose that the beginning of the line lies at x = −l and the end of the line is at x = 0. What happens if R = Z 0 ? The answer is that some of the power is reﬂected back down the line. the line acts rather like a pure 224 . t) Z0 cos kl + i R sin kl (4. implying that the transmission line absorbs no net power from the generator circuit. K= R − Z0 .366) Since the line is terminated by a resistance R at x = 0 we have. and the input impedance becomes Zin = i Z0 tan kl. then there is total reﬂection at the end of the line (i. with reﬂection coeﬃcient K. t) = KV0 V0 exp[i (ωt − kx)] − exp[i (ωt + kx)]. In fact. K = 0). If the line is short circuited.370) Clearly. t) = V0 exp[i (ωt − kx)] + KV0 exp[i (ωt + kx)].367) We have seen that if a transmission line is terminated by a resistor whose resistance R matches the impedance Z0 of the line then all the power sent down the line is absorbed by the resistor. K = −1)..This corresponds to a voltage wave of amplitude V0 which travels down the line and is reﬂected.371) This impedance is purely imaginary. so that R = Z0 . I(0. t) = Z0 .
e. of course..inductor or capacitor in the generator circuit (i.e. ﬁnally.e. If we wish to use a coaxial cable to connect the generator to the antenna. so that R → ∞. (4.. a quarter wave line looks like a pure resistor in the generator circuit. If the line is open circuited. Finally. A full wave antenna has a diﬀerent impedance than a half wave antenna. it can store. Zin = R (4. and Zin R (i.38. an antenna whose length equals the wavelength of the emitted radiation).372) Thus.. K = 1). if the length of the line is much less than the wavelength (i. Suppose. (4. otherwise some of the power we send down the line is reﬂected (i. We know that in electrical circuits such an antenna acts like a resistor of resistance 73 ohms (it is more usual to say that the antenna has an impedance of 73 ohms).. we ﬁnd Z0 2 .e.e. How do we transmit the power from the generator to the antenna? We use a transmission line.e. then there is again total reﬂection at the end of the line (i.e..) Since the impedance of the antenna is ﬁxed at 73 ohms we need to use a 73 ohm transmission line (i.. (It is clear that if the distance between the generator and the antenna is of order the dimensions of the antenna (i.373) Thus. Suppose that we want to build a radio transmitter.e. We can use a half wave antenna to emit the radiation.. and the input impedance becomes Zin = i Z0 tan(kl − π/2). Does this mean that we have to rip out our original coaxial cable and replace it by 225 . the open circuited line acts like a closed circuited line which is shorter by one quarter of a wavelength. not all of the power output of the generator is converted into radio waves).365) that the radii of the inner and outer conductors need to be such that b/a = 3. so we have to use a transmission line. λ/2) then the constant phase approximation breaks down. that we upgrade our transmitter to use a full wave antenna (i. energy). Suppose that we buy a 500 kW generator to supply the power to the antenna. kl 1) then we enter the constant phase regime.e. Z0 = 73 ohms) to connect the generator to the antenna. then it is clear from Eq. but cannot absorb. we can forget about the transmission line connecting the terminating resistor to the generator circuit). kl = π/2)... For the special case where the length of the line is exactly one quarter of a wavelength (i.
and Z1 the impedance of the antenna.e. Many important topics have been skipped in this course.g. It turns out that atoms polarize in the presence of electric ﬁelds. Under many circumstances this has the eﬀect of increasing the eﬀective permittivity of space. A quarter wave line of the appropriate impedance can easily be fabricated from a short length of coaxial cable of the appropriate b/a. we have not men 226 . our investigation of the many and varied applications of Maxwell’s equations must now come to and end. This explains why it is possible to receive long wavelength radio transmissions when the transmitter is over the horizon. Let Z 0 be the impedance of the coaxial cable. we have hardly mentioned the interaction of electric and magnetic ﬁelds with matter. therefore. For instance. Suppose that we place a quarter wave transmission line (i. where µ > 1 is called the relative permeability of matter. According to Eq..18 Epilogue Unfortunately.373) (with Z 0 → Z0 Z1 and R → Z1 ) the input impedance of the quarter wave line is Zin = Z0 .. Consequently. Magnetic materials (e. This has the eﬀect of increasing the eﬀective permeability of space. electromagnetic radiation. there is no reﬂection of the power sent down the cable to the antenna. where > 1 is called the relative permittivity or dielectric constant of matter. iron) develop net magnetic moments in the presence of magnetic ﬁelds. The output impedance matches that of the antenna.e. transmit. since we have run out of time. which matches that of the cable. one √ whose length is one quarter of a wavelength) of characteristic impedance Z 1/4 = Z0 Z1 between the √ end of the cable and the antenna. or eﬀectively slow down. Finally. escape to outer space. to receive FM or TV signals the transmitter must be in the line of sight (this explains the extremely local coverage of such transmitters). such as microwaves and radar. More interestingly. For instance. This is not possible at shorter wavelengths. Short wavelength waves are not reﬂected and. This is usually done by exciting electromagnetic standing waves in conducting cavities.. µ0 → µµ0 . Another fascinating topic is the generation of extremely short wavelength radiation.one whose impedance matches that of the new antenna? Not necessarily. long wavelength radio waves are reﬂected by charged particles in the ionosphere. matter can reﬂect. rather than by using antennas.e. 4. For instance. 0 → 0 . absorb. i. i.. (4.
somewhat surprisingly. It turns out. 227 . This is essentially because magnetism is an intrinsically relativistic phenomenon. In relativistic notation the whole theory of electromagnetism can be summed up in just two equations. that Maxwell’s equations are invariant under the Lorentz transformation.tioned relativity.