P. 1
Armstrong Lawsuit

Armstrong Lawsuit

|Views: 9|Likes:
Published by efuchs160

More info:

Published by: efuchs160 on Jul 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Armstrong’s position with respect to the evidence put before it.

Left with only one day to respond to the belatedly filed evidence,

counsel for Mr. Armstrong submitted to the Board a thirteen-

page, single-spaced defense at just before 5:00p.m. eastern on

June 27, 2012. Counsel presented a detailed argument that

challenged USADA’s jurisdiction based on the UCI’s Anti-

Doping Rules, explained that the information contained in the

submitted materials fell outside the statute of limitations, detailed

the record of lies told by a rider upon whom USADA relies, and

demonstrated that statements in the submission concerning

certain 2001 drug tests are verifiably wrong.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->