This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

my math education is). I'm like a small valid sample of 'products' from the 'assembly line' that is our math educational system in America. And although I essentially was a math major at MooU (Michigan State) and was a very conscientious student (dedicated and disciplined), I consider that I barely understand math and its theoretical underpinnings. Is this my fault? Or something else? Is our math teaching system totally flawed? YES. 1. We don't introduce vital concepts early like we should. Recently, you'll find an article written by me about Lebesgue measure and any connection to space/time. I'm 49 years old. I didn't encounter the vitally important concept of measure until I was around 35 years old when I was attending a graduate school in mathematics. For anyone in math, sciences, or engineering, they need to encounter this vital concept much earlier – say, sixth-grade or around 12 years old. Why? For the simple fact it's a core concept of our common number system and therefore relevant to any field depending on them .. Lebesgue measure surely is a 'deep mathematical concept' but.. That does not mean youth should not or cannot understand it. 2. Too much presentation/lecturing is performed in math. Everyone knows that math is a 'hands on' field absolutely requiring practice to 'get it'. There is not one single math course on the planet that does not require some 'homework' or working problems. Math is learned by working problems. Early on, this means learning what basic operations 'do' and practicing them. Later on, we get more sophisticated and our problem solving repertoire hopefully increases so that we can solve a variety of math problems appropriately. Knowing when to use particular techniques is just as important as facility in applying those techniques themselves. This takes time and practice. 3. There's little or no caring mentoring in the current system. This should have been my first point because of the glaring lack of mentors I've NOT experienced. I have no mentors / good teachers to compare against each other.. Perhaps I have one good teacher in math from both high-school and MSU – ONE. But even he refused to mentor appropriately. What do I mean by mentor? Encourage and inspire enthusiasm – love for math and math concepts.. With the right mentoring, I could have been a GREAT applied mathematician/scientist/engineer. Without mentoring, I'm 'floundering' and self-guided. 4. The pace and content are totally inappropriate. This does not apply so much to high-school or earlier courses in math.. I particularly remember advanced calculus and graduate courses in analysis and other topics. Essentially, the students are trying to rush themselves to keep up with taking notes. They have no time/energy/attention for the actual content. This is deplorable and unforgivable. You're forced to read through your notes to try to understand the theorems and proofs taught in class. Attempting to perform homework only resulted in more confusion. I had no choice but to drop-out of the system at that time. Unforgivable. 5. The arrogance of academicians is ill-founded and inappropriate. Other than snap-judgmentalness and vanity, arrogance is about the most repulsive human quality I can identify. Professors of mathematics and physics are about the most arrogant 'creatures' on the planet. Sheldon of Big Bang Theory is a parody but accurate portrayal of theoretical physicists. Both fields are very close conceptually and as sibling sciences. But the ego encountered in both is not DESIRED nor APPRECIATED. I can count on one hand – the humble professors in both fields I've encountered throughout my life.. This is unacceptable. Curb your ego-gorging. Wake up; grow up.

6. Proof motivation is NEVER addressed. Rarely is a professor of mathematics actually trained in education. This is a critical fault of our educational system. But we can't blame that lack of training for the other critical fault of our system: I've never heard/seen an instructor attempt to deal with proof-motivation (how the particular proof they're about to cover was arrived at or developed to prove a particular theorem). If they expect us to memorize proofs then later somehow miraculously develop our own theorems and proofs, I don't see the connection. Math education in America basically SUCKS and does nothing to inspire young mathematicians, scientists, or engineers to be anything but cogs in the machine. We don't train innovative/creative/curious scientists or engineers in America; we mass-produce robotic egotistical paper-pushers who do nothing but tow the line of the status quo. A perfect example is the LHC and 'the Higgs'.. A super-heavy transient particle is observed in a few decay schemes.. Because it fits their virtual boson-exchange and reductionist approach, 'the Higgs' is now labeled the 'source of mass'. Wow.. What vanity; what arrogance.. What narrow-mindedness.. And we have our 'wonderful' educational system to thank.. PS: math/physics textbooks seem to be deliberately obfuscating when they attempt to 'teach' something – especially at the 'higher' levels.. It's almost as if they're attempting to create an 'elite priesthood of mysteries' in both math and physics so that the only people who have the patience to unravel their complex deceptions will rise in their ranks.. I hate to bring in Satan at a time like this in the 'discussion' but.. It smacks of Satanic manipulation.

- Meme theory, idea inertia, and regeneration
- The Purposes of RIO and the Globalization of Appropriate Technology
- The Regenerative Approach Toward Emotional and Awareness States
- Peak Oil, Peak Innovation, and Sustainable Notions
- Regenerative Approach
- The Connection Between Control Theory, Linear Systems Theory, and Regenerative Engineering
- My appeal to Native Americans
- Why Plato's Republic can never work
- Nurturing, Managing, and Inspiring Synergy
- Dreaming the dreamer
- The different faces of synergy
- Asimov vs Micheal
- Engineering Synergy
- The Most Profound Truths of Our Existence
- The Discipline of the Holy Spirit
- Projects, goals, and intentions
- Axiomatizing humanity
- The nature of science
- General requirements for set theory and any quantum theory
- Set Theory
- The death of science.
- gamma, the Euler-Mascheroni constant
- Growing conscious agents in a VR
- Attribute Theory – a proposition
- Counting the 'uncountable' - pushing the boundaries in number/set theory

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulthe woes of math

the woes of math

- New Student Inventory
- mentorcommit2013-2014
- Mentoring FAQ
- HKUSTAA Graduate Mentoring Program
- Strategies about how Can I Train to be A Doula and Parent Private coach?
- Swanson and Williams, 2014. Abstract Concrete in Out School
- TUGASAN HBMT
- 1917885
- mentor mentee toolkit
- 40.Electronic Mentoring System for Women
- HR Practices
- DRONA Guidelines
- Money and Happiness
- Mentoring Guide_ All You Need to Know About Being a SAM Mentor
- Paper1 Implementing Strategies
- Concept Note_Math Master_ILFS Education_Biswa Nayak
- e Mentoring Implications
- Untitled
- 6 HRD Interventions
- Egnatchik_CommunityBuilding(EPortfolio)
- Untitled
- Lev Semenovich Pontryagin
- aPLaNet Mentee Guide Final En
- Irwin Kwan Diversity Statement
- Pascal David Hilbert "diophantine equation" David Hilbert P
- Cultural Integration
- 3. McGee (1996)
- 02e7e5261616a41c8f000000 -1
- Student Aid
- Odyssey Handbook
- The unforgivable deficiencies of our math educational system

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd