P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al.

/ International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

Response of Coastal Buildings Subjected to
Seismic and Tsunami Forces

P. KODANDA RAMA RAO
Associate Professor ,Department of Civil Engineering
Gudlavalleru Engg College, Gudlavalleru, A.P-521356, India.

S.R.K.REDDY
Director
Gudlavalleru Engg College, Gudlavalleru, A.P-521356, India.
K. RAMA MOHANA RAO
Professor in Civil Engg. & Director of BICS
JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, A.P. India.

Abstract:
A devastating tsunami generated by the great Indonesia earthquake on 26
th
December, 2004, revealed the
importance of constructing seismic and tsunami resistant structures in coastal regions. Hence, it is necessary to
establish analytical methods for obtaining the response parameters and comparing them when structures are
subjected to both earthquake and tsunami forces.

In this paper a two storied shelter building is chosen for the analysis considering six different types of structural
configurations and a comparative study is made on the response of these structures. In this analysis, base shear
values are determined using IS 1893(2002) seismic code and hydrodynamic forces are evaluated using FEMA’S
CCM. Buildings with open storey at bottom and upper stories with heavy mass give significant rise to the time
periods causing early failures during earthquake before tsunami arrives the coast. The authors have also
evaluated a useful guideline for demarcating the height of the building below which earthquake forces are
predominant and above which tsunami forces are predominant.

1. Introduction

Geological evidences reveal that most strong earthquakes, representing 80% of total energy released by
earthquakes, are considered to occur in subduction zones where an oceanic plate slides under a continental plate
or another young oceanic plate. On 26
th
December, 2004, Indonesian submarine earthquake with a Richter
magnitude of 9.3 generated catastrophic tsunamis killing more than two lakh people and created a major
economic impact on the countries surrounding the Indian Ocean. Such mega events reminded the coastal
community alert on the preparedness against initial ground shaking and subsequent effects followed by
tsunamis. As most of the tsunamis are earthquake induced tsunamis, it is necessary that coastal structures
should be designed against both earthquake and tsunami loads. Seismic and Tsunami resistant analyses are
complicated as the motion is transient and the forces are time dependent. Though there are no well established
design procedures for tsunami resilient buildings, FEMA CCM provided some guidelines based on the type and
nature of tsunami forces. A review by Harry Yeh, Ian Robertson and Jane Preuss(2005) suggested that fluid
forces exerted on a structure can be evaluated in terms of hydrodynamic and forces for a given depth of
inundation and the velocity of the approaching tsunami.

Okada et al. (2005) have proposed an empirical method for estimating the forces exerted on structures by
tsunami overland flow assuming that seaward face of the building will be loaded by a hydrostatic pressure based
on an immersion depth of three times the design inundation depth, with no load on the landward face of the
structure. The impact of the earthquake reportedly altered the topography in certain regions and strongly warned
the community particularly along the Indian coast and Andaman and Nicobar (A&N) Islands. Although
tsunamis cannot be prevented its impact can be minimized through mitigation measures like community
preparedness, timely warnings public education and enforcement of byelaws. Another concern is lack of
integration of seismic codes with other construction codes. The concrete design code (IS 456-2007) does not
give cross reference to detailing code (IS-13920-1993) and often the professional engineers are unaware of
additional detailing requirements.

ISSN: 0975-5462 6195
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

The process of long-term planning and civil engineering research should raise to the occasion so that protection
measures against earthquakes and tsunamis become ingrained in the designs.

2. Earthquakes and Earthquake Effects

The honor of greatest earthquake of all times goes to the 1960 Chile earthquake which measured 9.5 on the
moment magnitude scale where Nazca plate subducted under the south American Continent .The focus of the
earthquake was 60 km down below the ocean floor and about 160 km off the coast of Chile out in the pacific.
Not only was there damage to the manmade structures during earthquake, but the earth itself was forever
changed by enormous amount of energy released. Huge landslides, massive flows of earthen debris and rock
material were sent down the mountain slopes and some landslides changed the course of major rivers.

December 26, 2004, Indonesia earthquake was the second largest ever recorded and the duration of the
earthquake was long but the focal point was at about 30 km depth. The ocean floor area was covered by soft
soil contributing to the implication of seismic waves. The strongest shaking was felt in Banda Aceh, Indonesia,
causing significant damage. Many seismic deficiencies of buildings, known to cause poor structural
performance, were clearly witnessed throughout the city, Banda Aceh. During earthquake shaking, the R.C.
frame buildings which appeared to have been constructed with strong and relatively deep beams supported by
weak and smaller dimensioned columns suffered severe damage or collapse showing the signs of formation of
early hinging at top level of columns, while the majority of beams remained elastic until the collapse. Lack of
joint reinforcement also caused the above failures. Soft stories in most of the commercial buildings suffered
increased deformations coupled with lack of confinement and column deformability resulted in column failures
at many places. Failure of first story columns attributed the collapse of entire building. Lack of transverse
reinforcement in column splice regions, coupled with inadequate splice lengths and seismic design practices also
resulted in column failures. Unreinforced masonry constructions used as exterior and interior infill walls
increased the building mass and attracted seismic forces.

A devastating earthquake measuring a magnitude 7.3 on the Richter scale struck Haiti on 12
th
January 2010 and
killed more than two lakh people leaving hundreds and thousands homeless. With a gap of few weeks after
occurrence of Haiti, another 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit the Chilean coast on 27
th
February 2010. But a
prolonged Tsunami warning issued by the Japanese authorities sent five lakh people fleeing for elevated places
thus reducing the death toll drastically to 891. Through Haiti is less powerful temblor compared to chile
earthquake, the extent of damage to structures and loss of life in Haiti is much higher. The reason lies not just in
Chile’s longer experience with geologic adversity, but also the capacity of Chileans’ government to enact and
enforce the building codes and rescuing operations.

3. Tsunamis and Tsunami Effects

Tsunamis have great erosional ability and they can strip beaches of sand and coastal vegetation. Likewise,
tsunamis are capable of inundating the coastal lands. The fast-moving water associated with the inundating
tsunami can destroy houses and other coastal structures. A tsunami generated by the Niigatta earthquake 1964
caused damage to port and harbor facilities because of ground failure and liquefaction as a result of ground
subsidence. The erosion of soil underneath the foundation during the tsunami caused settlement of many
structures during the 1964 Alaska earthquake. Series of tsunamis in Japan in 1986 killed 27000 people. 1992
Nicaraguan earthquake tsunami deposited a vast sediment blanket over many low lands along the affected area.
An earthquake occurred in Java trench in 1994, triggered a large tsunami and killed 200 people. 1998 Papua
New Guinea tsunami that killed more than 2100 people, with wave heights up to 12 m, was triggered by a
submarine slump.

Tectonic Tsunamis tend to have longer wave lengths, longer periods and a larger source area than those
generated by mass movement of the earth. The geometry of earthquake fault constitutes a ternary family
featuring three fundamental parameters; strike-slip, thrust and normal fault. Strike-slip is a transform fault,
which produces horizontal motion of Earth’s crust; where as thrust and normal faults entail vertical motion.
Generally, the larger the magnitude of an earthquake, the larger the area that is deformed. Hence, submarine
thrust or normal faults produce tsunamis as the sea floor lifts up pushing the water up on one side or drops down
pulling it down on the other side, and causes triggering wave motion on the ocean surface. Strong earthquakes
not only deform larger areas, but they do so by a greater amount of slip, thus producing larger tsunamis than
smaller events. Earthquakes deeper than about 30 km, rarely cause sufficient deformation to generate tsunamis.
However, truly mega thrust earthquakes, which occur deeper than 30 km, such as 1960 Chile event and recent
2004 Sumatra earthquake can also occasionally trigger tsunamis.
ISSN: 0975-5462 6196
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

The energy imparted to the water during tsunami formation sets the entire water column in motion. Hence,
tsunamis not only possess a lot of energy and move at high speeds, but they can also travel greater distances
with little energy loss. In typical ocean depth of 4 km, a tsunami travels at a speed of nearly 700 kmph. When
tsunamis enter shallow waters, they slow down; at a depth 30 m, shallow water waves travel at only 60 kmph.
Like wise, tsunami transforms as it leaves the deep water of the ocean and travels into shallow water near the
coast. The first piece of information required for modeling tsunamis is the size and distribution of seafloor
deformation following an earthquake and the amount of energy released. The tsunami speed further diminishes
as it travels into the shallower coastal water and its height grows. While tsunami may be imperceptible at sea,
the shoaling effect (Fig. 1) near the coast causes the tsunami to grow to be several meters of height. When it
finally reaches the coast, the tsunami may develop into a rapidly rising or falling tide, a series of breaking
waves.










During 2004 Indonesian Earthquake, due to subduction of Indian plate underneath the Burma plate, A & N
Islands sustained for both uplift and subsidence. The southernmost tip of Great Nicobar Island, which was on
elevated ground before earthquake is now under water, indicating a land subsidence of about 3m. On the other
hand, the western coast of Middle Andaman Islands showed emergence of new shallow coral beaches
suggesting an uplift up to 0.3m and Diglipur harbor at Northern region of Andaman indicated an uplift of 1.2 m.
US geological survey expert, Ken Hudnet said that some of smaller islands off the Southwest coast of Sumatra
may have moved to southwest by about 20 m.

In Thailand and Indonesia, it was observed that non-engineering R.C. structures, low rise timber frames, non-
reinforced masonry buildings suffered extensive damage due to hydrodynamic pressures generated by tsunami
and impact forces induced by floating debris; where as Banda Aceh, Indonesia, suffered extensive damage due
to seismic excitation. In Kata Beach, Thailand, the tsunami wave height was measured approximately 6m above
sea level. Some of the failure examples that were reported are

- Widespread failure of masonry infill walls within the first storey level of most frame buildings.
- Damage of prefabricated R.C. slab strips due to uplift forces caused by hydrostatic pressures.
- Lack of proper anchorage to the supporting beams was balanced for failure of these slab systems.
- Storage tanks should be well anchored to their foundations to resist tsunami pressures.
- Light timber frame buildings are extremely vulnerable to tsunami pressures.
- Soft stories experienced widespread damage, often resulting in the collapse of first stories some times
leading to total building collapses.

While the topographical changes in little A & N Islands are tsunami-related, the failure of many non-
engineering structures and poorly constructed R.C. buildings are due to earthquake shaking. Jain et al. (2005)
made aerial and field surveys along east and west coastlines of India and A & N Islands, immediately after the
occurrence of 2004 earthquake tsunami. Some interesting observations on damage both due to earthquake
ground shaking and tsunami impact were analyzed. Damage due to earthquake shaking was recorded mainly in
A & N Islands since the long duration of shaking coupled with low water table led to liquefaction at many
coastal areas.

Experimental studies were conducted to estimate the tsunami force exerted on damaged coastal structures
through in situ strength tests. Strong and flexible objects like handrails of balcony or staircase remained slightly
deformed or bent even after being hit by gigantic tsunami. Series of in situ strength tests were conducted by
Tsutsumi et al. (2000) on similar handrail samples to determine the forces needed to deform them in a
same manner as those of handrails bent during the Southwest Hokkaido earthquake tsunami of 1993. Tests were
also performed to estimate the advancing direction, true height and flow velocity of the tsunami on land for the
future assessment of tsunami disasters.

Fig. 1 Shoaling effect of Tsunami
ISSN: 0975-5462 6197
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

4. Design Parameters:

Though there are well established procedures for earthquake analyses, till recent years, no significant research
has been undertaken on design of structures to resist tsunamis. The design requirements for seismic response
generally depend upon the weight, structural flexibility, ductility and redundancy; while the design parameters
for tsunami forces require considerable strength and rigidity of the structure particularly at lower levels. The
wave height of tsunami approaching the shore results from the influence of three dimensional bathymetry and
coastal topography. Even though use of good engineering techniques and materials will help a structure to resist
tsunami forces, in case of large tsunami events such as December 26, 2004 tsunami, they will only reduce losses
but can not prevent severe damage. The best way to minimize the tsunami losses is to construct tsunami shelters
for vertical evacuation or locate buildings beyond the reach of tsunami run-up for horizontal evacuation.

5. Method of Analysis


In this paper a two storied R.C. shelter building for evacuees is chosen for the study and the analysis for
dynamic response against both seismic and tsunami forces is carried out considering six different types of
configurations of the shelter.

Type 1 : Both G.F. and F.F. with outer and inner infill walls.
Type 2 : G.F. with outer and inner infill walls and F.F. with only outer infill walls
Type 3 : G.F. with only outer infill walls and F.F. with both outer and inner infill walls.
Type 4 : Both G.F. and F.F. with only outer infill walls.
Type 5 : G.F. with cellar and F.F. with only outer infill walls.
Type 6 : G.F. with cellar and F.F. with both outer and inner infill walls.
5.1 Structural Features
The shelter is 12m x 12m size in plan with three equal bays 4m each and is structured with sixteen columns,
the height of each storey being 3.35m. Member dimensions are with 120mm thick floor slabs, 230 x 400 mm
beams and 300 x 300mm columns. Thickness of outer infill walls and inner infill walls are taken as 230mm and
150mm respectively.

The values of Young’s Modulus for reinforced cement concrete and masonry are taken as 22360 N/mm
2
and
13800 N/mm
2
respectively.

The six types of structures are analyzed based on the consideration of dynamic forces associated with
earthquake and tsunami separately. Normally most of the tsunamis are triggered due to undersea earthquakes
and hence the coastal structures are subjected to ground shaking initially followed by tsunamis later.

Though coastal structures are subjected to severe wind pressures, past research results indicate that impact of
hydrodynamic impulsive wave pressures are much higher than wind. Hence, in this analysis wind force is not
considered. Hydrodynamic forces caused by different tsunami induced inundations are compared with
earthquake forces when these structures are located in different seismic zones.

5.2 Analysis for Earthquake Forces

The present analysis is carried out considering the shelters are situated in seismic zones II and III as the majority
regions along the east coast belt of Indian peninsula fall under the category of these two zones according to
latest IS 1893 code.

All the six types of the chosen structures are idealized as mass-spring models treating each system with two
degrees of freedom with an assumption that the structure is fixed at the base. The stiffness of each storey is
evaluated considering the effect of stiffness of infill walls also. In case of the storey without infill walls, each
column stiffness value is taken as k
c
= 12 E
c
I
c
/h
2
and the stiffness of each storey is worked out. In case of storey
with infill walls, the system is modeled as a braced frame approximating the infill wall as an equivalent diagonal
strut. The vital approach is to determine the effective width of the equivalent diagonal strut (w
e
) which depends
on

i) The length of contact between the wall and the column, α
h
and
ii) The length of contact between the wall and the beam, α
l
.

where
ISSN: 0975-5462 6198
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

h
o =
2
t
4
1
2 sin 2
(
¸
(

¸

u t E
h I E
m
c c
and
4
1
2 sin
(
¸
(

¸

=
u
t o
t E
l I E
m
b c
l

The formulations of Stafford Smith (1966) given below are used to calculate stiffness of infill wall, k
w
.

k
w
=
d
m
l
AE u
2
cos
(1)
In Eq. 1,
l
d
=
2 2
l h +
; θ = tan
-1

(
¸
(

¸

l
h
, A = w
e
x t and w
e
=
2
1 2 2
l h
o o +
,
Where
A – Area of cross section of the member
E
c
– Young’s Modulus value of reinforced cement concrete
h – Height of the wall/column
E
m
– Young’s Modulus value of masonry
I
b
– Moment of inertia of column element
I
c
– Moment of inertia of beam element
l – Length of the wall
t – Thickness of the wall

The total equivalent stiffness of each storey is taken as ∑ k
c
+ ∑ k
w
.
The masses and equivalent stiffness values of each storey for each type of structure are worked out for the use in
the analysis. Free vibration analysis software is used for obtaining the fundamental time periods of these
structures. The values are presented in Table 2, and the graphical representation has shown in fig.3. Based on
these time period values, response spectral curves given in IS 1893 code are used to calculate the shears at
ground and first floor levels for all the cases. The base shear values are worked out when these structures are
situated in seismic zones II & III and the results are presented in Table 2.

5.3 Analysis for Tsunami Forces

According to Camfield (1994) the following types of forces may result when tsunami run-up strikes the
buildings with high velocities.

- Hydrostatic forces caused by partial or fully submergence of structures.
- Hydrodynamic forces caused by high velocity of surging water.
- Buoyant forces caused by partial or full submergence.
- Impact forces caused by driftwood, small boats, lumber, portions of houses and other debris material carried
away by surge water.
- Surge forces caused by leading edge of the surge impinging on a structure.

In principle, the calculation of wave force on a structure involves the integration of pressure and shear force
over the exposed area of the structure.

In the event of a large tsunami, design codes provide expressions for different forces that may be produced due
to tsunami wave impact on coastal structures. When turbulent water flows around the building, hydrodynamic
loads are applied to the structure in the direction of approaching tsunami wave. These loads are caused by the
impact of moving mass of the water and friction forces as the water flows around the obstructions. In the
analysis only hydrodynamic forces are considered and the equations suggested by Harry Yeh et al. (2005) are
used.

Assuming the beach slope 1 in 50 as in Fig.2, inundation depths (h
max
) are calculated for different tsunami
heights when these structures are located at distances 100 m and 150 m from the shore. Inundation depth and
flow velocity of a tsunami wave are the important parameters for evaluation of external forces imparted to the
structures.

It may be noted that, if a structure is situated at an elevation of 2m above sea level, the 3m flow (inundation)
depth at the building site would be equal to 5m tsunami.




ISSN: 0975-5462 6199
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203












Hydrodynamic (drag) force is expressed as proportional to the product of the square of flow velocity and the
projected area of the structure. The drag coefficient value, C
D
, is taken as 2.0 for rectangular column members
and 3.0 for wall members. In the present study C
D
value is taken as 2.0 for square colomns. For a given
location, the design value of (h
max
u
2
) is computed from Eq.2 and the corresponding drag force, F
D
, is obtained
from Eq.3.

2
2
max
gR
u h
= 0.125 – 0.235
R
Z
+ 0.11
2
(
¸
(

¸

R
Z
(2)

F
D
=
2
1
ρC
D
bh
max
u
2
(3)
where
L – Distance of location of the structure from shore line
R – Maximum run up height of tsunami above shore line
Z – Height of location point of the structure above shore line
h
max
- Maximum Inundation Depth above base of the structure
u – Tsunami wave velocity approaching the structure
ρ - Mass density of sea water
b - Breadth of exposed column/wall member
Using Eq.3, the values of hydrodynamic force on all types of structures are calculated for different inundation
depths and the values are presented in Table 2.

It may be noted that, the analyses are carried out for independent actions of tsunami and earthquake separately,
when the structures are located in different seismic regions. Hence, Eq.3 depends only on the intensity of
tsunami and does not depend upon the seismic zone.

Table 2. Time period and base shear values due to earthquake forces and hydrodynamic forces due to tsunami

Type of
Structure
Due to earthquake Due to Tsunami
Natural
Time
Period
(sec)
Seismic
Zone
Base Shear (KN) Hydrodynamic force in (kN) when
ground
floor level
First floor
level
h
max
= 2m h
max
= 3m h
max
= 5m h
max
= 6m
Type - 1 0.088
II 287.0 216.7
72.6 149.4 412.0 575.0
III 459.1 346.7
Type - 2 0.091
II 269.5 202.3
III 431.3 323.7
Type - 3 0.107
II 297.64 228.5
III 476.2 365.6
Type - 4 0.110
II 274.5 210.0
III 439.2 336.0
Type - 5 0.385
II 256.0 201.3
28.5 59.84 200.0 310.0 III 409.6 322.0
Type - 6 0.400
II 279.8 220.4

III 447.6 352.6



L
Z
R
Tsunami
Structur
h
Fig. 2 Run up Zone of Tsunami
ISSN: 0975-5462 6200
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203












0.088 0.091
0.107 0.110
0.385
0.400
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
0.400
0.450
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 6
T
i
m
e
 
p
e
r
i
o
d
 
i
n
 
S
e
c
o
n
d
s
Fig. 4 is the graphical representation of Storey height vs Shear force due to earthquake and Inundation depth
vs Hydrodynamic force due to tsunami for Type - 1 structure. Corresponding results for Types 2 - 6
structures are shown graphically in Figs. 5~9.
Fig.3 is the graphical representation of Type of Structure Vs Time period due to Earthquake Forces
ISSN: 0975-5462 6201
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203



6. Result Analysis

The time period values of the chosen six buildings with different structure configurations are shown in fig.3
The time period values of Type – 1 to 4 structures are found less compared to Type 5& 6 structures which
indicates that reduction of stiffness in ground storey increases the time period of the structure, particularly when
ground floors are with cellars.

The earthquake force mainly depends upon the characteristics of ground motion, stiffness, seismic weight and
configuration of the structure; while in case of tsunami, the imparted forces on the structure depend upon the
velocity, inundation depth and the exposed area on the wave side of the structure. From the results, it is
observed that slender structures produce less base shear compared to those of rigid structures. It is also
observed that reduction in mass at lower floor levels decrease the base shear value.

Further, from the graphs, it is noticed that at some specific height, h
c
, the tsunami force and earthquake force are
equal in magnitude. Such h
c
values for the six types of structures when situated in seismic zones II & III are
presented in Table 3. For values below h
c
, earthquake forces and values above h
c
, tsunami forces are
predominant. This could be an effective guideline for better design in future.

Table 3. Proposed guideline for design

Type of Structure Seismic Zone
h
c

(in meters)
Design criteria
Type - 1
II 3.4



i) for heights > h
c
, the design shall be
for tsunami forces and
ii) for heights < h
c
, the design shall be
for earthquake force
III 4.4
Type - 2
II 3.3
III 4.2
Type - 3
II 3.5
III 4.6
Type - 4
II 3.4
III 4.2
Type - 5
II 5.1
III 6.0
Type - 6
II 5.2
III 6.0

7. Conclusions

- The shelter should be designed both for ground shaking initially and for subsequent triggered tsunami.
- Decrease in stiffness of lower level floors (soft-storey) increases the time period of the structure.
- Base shear values against seismic conditions increase with increase of stiffness in upper floors and decrease
ISSN: 0975-5462 6202
P. Kodanda Rama Rao et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6195-6203

with increase of stiffness in lower floors, justifying the general conclusion that flexible structures are more
resistant to earthquakes forces compared to rigid structures.
- R.C. frame buildings with open ground storey are considered effective to reduce the tsunami force; where as
such soft stories tend to fail under severe seismic conditions. In view of this a balanced design approach is
necessary in planning Earthquake – Tsunami - Resistant shelters.
- Weight of structure plays vital role under seismic conditions, while the exposed area on seaward side of the
structure in run up zone is a major factor to resist tsunami wave pressures.
- The shelter should be designed to allow the waves to pass through by braking the walls (non-structural
elements) at tsunami reached level, mostly at ground floor, while the structural elements (column, beam,
lateral bracing and other structural connections) are designed to withstand the tsunami impact.
- Depending upon the intensity of the tsunami and the seismic zone in which the structure is located, the
design criteria should be such that, below the height (h
c
) earthquake forces are to be considered, while above
the height (h
c
) the tsunami forces are to be considered

8. References

[1] I.S. 1893 (Part-I)2002: “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures” Fifth Revision 2002. Matsutomi, H & Shuto.N (1994),
“Tsunami Engineering Technical Report No.11, DCRC, Tohoku University, pp 29-32.
[2] Murat Saatcioglu.Ahmed Ghobarah and Ioan Nistor (2005),Reconnaissance Report on“The December 26, 2004 Sumatra Earthquake
and Tsunami” CAEE,The Canadian Association for earthquake Engineering, pp 1 – 21.
[3] Pankaj Agarwal and Manish Shrikhande; “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures” Printice Hall of India,
[4] New Delhi (2006).
[5] Reddy S.R.K. et al. (2006) “Terrain Evaluation and Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Structures in Urban
Environs” Proc. of 3
rd
International Conference on Protection of Structures against Hazards: Italy, pp 235 – 242.
[6] Tsuneo Okada et al. (2005) “Tsunami loads and Structural Design of Tsunami Refuge Buildings”.
[7] Tsutsumi.A; et al. (2000) “Near Shore flow velocity of southwest Hokkaido Earthquake Tsunami” Journal of
[8] Waterway Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering May / June 2000, pp 136-143.
[9] Yeh.H; Robertson.I; and Preuss.J (2005) “Development of design guidelines for structures that serve as tsunami vertical evacuation
sites” Report No.2005-4, Washington State Department of Natural Resources.

ISSN: 0975-5462 6203

8 magnitude earthquake hit the Chilean coast on 27th February 2010. coupled with inadequate splice lengths and seismic design practices also resulted in column failures. The fast-moving water associated with the inundating tsunami can destroy houses and other coastal structures. causing significant damage. Many seismic deficiencies of buildings. With a gap of few weeks after occurrence of Haiti. Failure of first story columns attributed the collapse of entire building. During earthquake shaking. 2. Earthquakes and Earthquake Effects The honor of greatest earthquake of all times goes to the 1960 Chile earthquake which measured 9. truly mega thrust earthquakes. which occur deeper than 30 km. another 8. known to cause poor structural performance. was triggered by a submarine slump. A devastating earthquake measuring a magnitude 7. but they do so by a greater amount of slip.The focus of the earthquake was 60 km down below the ocean floor and about 160 km off the coast of Chile out in the pacific. Soft stories in most of the commercial buildings suffered increased deformations coupled with lack of confinement and column deformability resulted in column failures at many places. rarely cause sufficient deformation to generate tsunamis. but the earth itself was forever changed by enormous amount of energy released. al. frame buildings which appeared to have been constructed with strong and relatively deep beams supported by weak and smaller dimensioned columns suffered severe damage or collapse showing the signs of formation of early hinging at top level of columns. 3. the extent of damage to structures and loss of life in Haiti is much higher.P. Strong earthquakes not only deform larger areas. where as thrust and normal faults entail vertical motion. thus producing larger tsunamis than smaller events. The geometry of earthquake fault constitutes a ternary family featuring three fundamental parameters. massive flows of earthen debris and rock material were sent down the mountain slopes and some landslides changed the course of major rivers. Banda Aceh. Generally. Huge landslides. The strongest shaking was felt in Banda Aceh. thrust and normal fault. such as 1960 Chile event and recent 2004 Sumatra earthquake can also occasionally trigger tsunamis. submarine thrust or normal faults produce tsunamis as the sea floor lifts up pushing the water up on one side or drops down pulling it down on the other side. longer periods and a larger source area than those generated by mass movement of the earth. but also the capacity of Chileans’ government to enact and enforce the building codes and rescuing operations. 6195-6203 The process of long-term planning and civil engineering research should raise to the occasion so that protection measures against earthquakes and tsunamis become ingrained in the designs. the larger the area that is deformed. Indonesia earthquake was the second largest ever recorded and the duration of the earthquake was long but the focal point was at about 30 km depth. Indonesia. Strike-slip is a transform fault. Hence. December 26. Series of tsunamis in Japan in 1986 killed 27000 people. Tsunamis and Tsunami Effects Tsunamis have great erosional ability and they can strip beaches of sand and coastal vegetation. The reason lies not just in Chile’s longer experience with geologic adversity. triggered a large tsunami and killed 200 people. tsunamis are capable of inundating the coastal lands. 1998 Papua New Guinea tsunami that killed more than 2100 people. A tsunami generated by the Niigatta earthquake 1964 caused damage to port and harbor facilities because of ground failure and liquefaction as a result of ground subsidence. Kodanda Rama Rao et. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. Tectonic Tsunamis tend to have longer wave lengths. and causes triggering wave motion on the ocean surface. But a prolonged Tsunami warning issued by the Japanese authorities sent five lakh people fleeing for elevated places thus reducing the death toll drastically to 891. However. 2004. the larger the magnitude of an earthquake. while the majority of beams remained elastic until the collapse. An earthquake occurred in Java trench in 1994. The ocean floor area was covered by soft soil contributing to the implication of seismic waves.3 on the Richter scale struck Haiti on 12th January 2010 and killed more than two lakh people leaving hundreds and thousands homeless. which produces horizontal motion of Earth’s crust. Likewise.5 on the moment magnitude scale where Nazca plate subducted under the south American Continent . strike-slip. Not only was there damage to the manmade structures during earthquake. Earthquakes deeper than about 30 km. Lack of joint reinforcement also caused the above failures. 2(11). The erosion of soil underneath the foundation during the tsunami caused settlement of many structures during the 1964 Alaska earthquake. Unreinforced masonry constructions used as exterior and interior infill walls increased the building mass and attracted seismic forces. ISSN: 0975-5462 6196 . Lack of transverse reinforcement in column splice regions. with wave heights up to 12 m.C. the R. were clearly witnessed throughout the city. 1992 Nicaraguan earthquake tsunami deposited a vast sediment blanket over many low lands along the affected area. Through Haiti is less powerful temblor compared to chile earthquake. 2010.

When it finally reaches the coast.2 m. Series of in situ strength tests were conducted by Tsutsumi et al. 1 Shoaling effect of Tsunami During 2004 Indonesian Earthquake. the western coast of Middle Andaman Islands showed emergence of new shallow coral beaches suggesting an uplift up to 0. Like wise. Ken Hudnet said that some of smaller islands off the Southwest coast of Sumatra may have moved to southwest by about 20 m. 2(11). structures. ISSN: 0975-5462 6197 . they slow down. a tsunami travels at a speed of nearly 700 kmph. (2005) made aerial and field surveys along east and west coastlines of India and A & N Islands. Lack of proper anchorage to the supporting beams was balanced for failure of these slab systems. While the topographical changes in little A & N Islands are tsunami-related. immediately after the occurrence of 2004 earthquake tsunami. 2010. 1) near the coast causes the tsunami to grow to be several meters of height. In Kata Beach. which was on elevated ground before earthquake is now under water. the tsunami may develop into a rapidly rising or falling tide. Indonesia. indicating a land subsidence of about 3m. Jain et al. shallow water waves travel at only 60 kmph. Light timber frame buildings are extremely vulnerable to tsunami pressures. When tsunamis enter shallow waters. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. Hence. Strong and flexible objects like handrails of balcony or staircase remained slightly deformed or bent even after being hit by gigantic tsunami. In typical ocean depth of 4 km. Thailand. but they can also travel greater distances with little energy loss. the failure of many nonengineering structures and poorly constructed R. A & N Islands sustained for both uplift and subsidence. slab strips due to uplift forces caused by hydrostatic pressures. Fig. buildings are due to earthquake shaking. Soft stories experienced widespread damage.C. the shoaling effect (Fig. at a depth 30 m. Tests were also performed to estimate the advancing direction. The first piece of information required for modeling tsunamis is the size and distribution of seafloor deformation following an earthquake and the amount of energy released. Experimental studies were conducted to estimate the tsunami force exerted on damaged coastal structures through in situ strength tests. US geological survey expert. it was observed that non-engineering R. often resulting in the collapse of first stories some times leading to total building collapses.3m and Diglipur harbor at Northern region of Andaman indicated an uplift of 1.C. While tsunami may be imperceptible at sea. Some interesting observations on damage both due to earthquake ground shaking and tsunami impact were analyzed. Kodanda Rama Rao et. tsunamis not only possess a lot of energy and move at high speeds. Storage tanks should be well anchored to their foundations to resist tsunami pressures. In Thailand and Indonesia. suffered extensive damage due to seismic excitation. (2000) on similar handrail samples to determine the forces needed to deform them in a same manner as those of handrails bent during the Southwest Hokkaido earthquake tsunami of 1993. The tsunami speed further diminishes as it travels into the shallower coastal water and its height grows. Damage due to earthquake shaking was recorded mainly in A & N Islands since the long duration of shaking coupled with low water table led to liquefaction at many coastal areas. low rise timber frames. nonreinforced masonry buildings suffered extensive damage due to hydrodynamic pressures generated by tsunami and impact forces induced by floating debris. The southernmost tip of Great Nicobar Island. al. true height and flow velocity of the tsunami on land for the future assessment of tsunami disasters. the tsunami wave height was measured approximately 6m above sea level. Some of the failure examples that were reported are       Widespread failure of masonry infill walls within the first storey level of most frame buildings. where as Banda Aceh. due to subduction of Indian plate underneath the Burma plate.C.P. On the other hand. Damage of prefabricated R. tsunami transforms as it leaves the deep water of the ocean and travels into shallow water near the coast. a series of breaking waves. 6195-6203 The energy imparted to the water during tsunami formation sets the entire water column in motion.

2010.F. Hydrodynamic forces caused by different tsunami induced inundations are compared with earthquake forces when these structures are located in different seismic zones. with both outer and inner infill walls. αl. in this analysis wind force is not considered. The best way to minimize the tsunami losses is to construct tsunami shelters for vertical evacuation or locate buildings beyond the reach of tsunami run-up for horizontal evacuation. no significant research has been undertaken on design of structures to resist tsunamis. The values of Young’s Modulus for reinforced cement concrete and masonry are taken as 22360 N/mm2 and 13800 N/mm2 respectively. Though coastal structures are subjected to severe wind pressures. with outer and inner infill walls.F. with cellar and F. Normally most of the tsunamis are triggered due to undersea earthquakes and hence the coastal structures are subjected to ground shaking initially followed by tsunamis later. in case of large tsunami events such as December 26. where ISSN: 0975-5462 6198 . with only outer infill walls. 5. while the design parameters for tsunami forces require considerable strength and rigidity of the structure particularly at lower levels.F. with both outer and inner infill walls. structural flexibility.C. al. Method of Analysis In this paper a two storied R. Member dimensions are with 120mm thick floor slabs. Type 6 : G.F.F. with only outer infill walls and F. with cellar and F. with outer and inner infill walls and F. The design requirements for seismic response generally depend upon the weight.F. till recent years. Design Parameters: Though there are well established procedures for earthquake analyses. Thickness of outer infill walls and inner infill walls are taken as 230mm and 150mm respectively. In case of the storey without infill walls. ductility and redundancy. Even though use of good engineering techniques and materials will help a structure to resist tsunami forces. 5.F. In case of storey with infill walls. The six types of structures are analyzed based on the consideration of dynamic forces associated with earthquake and tsunami separately. 2(11). 2004 tsunami. 5.1 Structural Features The shelter is 12m x 12m size in plan with three equal bays 4m each and is structured with sixteen columns. αh and ii) The length of contact between the wall and the beam. Type 1 : Both G.F. each column stiffness value is taken as kc = 12 EcIc/h2 and the stiffness of each storey is worked out. Kodanda Rama Rao et. 6195-6203 4.35m. The wave height of tsunami approaching the shore results from the influence of three dimensional bathymetry and coastal topography. Hence. and F. with only outer infill walls. shelter building for evacuees is chosen for the study and the analysis for dynamic response against both seismic and tsunami forces is carried out considering six different types of configurations of the shelter. The vital approach is to determine the effective width of the equivalent diagonal strut (we) which depends on i) The length of contact between the wall and the column. The stiffness of each storey is evaluated considering the effect of stiffness of infill walls also. past research results indicate that impact of hydrodynamic impulsive wave pressures are much higher than wind. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 230 x 400 mm beams and 300 x 300mm columns. Type 4 : Both G. and F. with only outer infill walls Type 3 : G. the system is modeled as a braced frame approximating the infill wall as an equivalent diagonal strut.F.F.2 Analysis for Earthquake Forces The present analysis is carried out considering the shelters are situated in seismic zones II and III as the majority regions along the east coast belt of Indian peninsula fall under the category of these two zones according to latest IS 1893 code. they will only reduce losses but can not prevent severe damage. All the six types of the chosen structures are idealized as mass-spring models treating each system with two degrees of freedom with an assumption that the structure is fixed at the base. Type 5 : G.F. Type 2 : G.F. the height of each storey being 3.P.

if a structure is situated at an elevation of 2m above sea level. Hydrodynamic forces caused by high velocity of surging water. ld = h 2  l 2 . Kodanda Rama Rao et. It may be noted that. the calculation of wave force on a structure involves the integration of pressure and shear force over the exposed area of the structure. Assuming the beach slope 1 in 50 as in Fig. These loads are caused by the impact of moving mass of the water and friction forces as the water flows around the obstructions. lumber. l  2   Where A – Area of cross section of the member Ec – Young’s Modulus value of reinforced cement concrete h – Height of the wall/column Em – Young’s Modulus value of masonry Ib – Moment of inertia of column element Ic – Moment of inertia of beam element l – Length of the wall t – Thickness of the wall The total equivalent stiffness of each storey is taken as ∑ kc + ∑ kw. hydrodynamic loads are applied to the structure in the direction of approaching tsunami wave. portions of houses and other debris material carried away by surge water. 4 2 kw = AE m cos  h =  1 1 (1) ld In Eq. In the event of a large tsunami. Inundation depth and flow velocity of a tsunami wave are the important parameters for evaluation of external forces imparted to the structures.3 Analysis for Tsunami Forces According to Camfield (1994) the following types of forces may result when tsunami run-up strikes the buildings with high velocities. and the graphical representation has shown in fig. A = we x t and we = 1  h 2   l 2 . 2010.  Surge forces caused by leading edge of the surge impinging on a structure. design codes provide expressions for different forces that may be produced due to tsunami wave impact on coastal structures. The values are presented in Table 2. Free vibration analysis software is used for obtaining the fundamental time periods of these structures. In principle.2. Based on these time period values. 1. the 3m flow (inundation) depth at the building site would be equal to 5m tsunami. θ = tan-1  h  . inundation depths (hmax) are calculated for different tsunami heights when these structures are located at distances 100 m and 150 m from the shore. response spectral curves given in IS 1893 code are used to calculate the shears at ground and first floor levels for all the cases. When turbulent water flows around the building. 5.3. Impact forces caused by driftwood. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. Buoyant forces caused by partial or full submergence. 2(11). The base shear values are worked out when these structures are situated in seismic zones II & III and the results are presented in Table 2. small boats. al. In the analysis only hydrodynamic forces are considered and the equations suggested by Harry Yeh et al. 6195-6203  Ec I b l   E c I c h  4 and l     2  2E m t sin 2   Emt sin 2    The formulations of Stafford Smith (1966) given below are used to calculate stiffness of infill wall.P.     Hydrostatic forces caused by partial or fully submergence of structures. kw. ISSN: 0975-5462 6199 . (2005) are used. The masses and equivalent stiffness values of each storey for each type of structure are worked out for the use in the analysis.

0 for square colomns. 2(11).235 Z + 0. 2010.0 220. Hence.6 279.5 365.5 59.3 depends only on the intensity of tsunami and does not depend upon the seismic zone.385 0.0 409.2 256.6 216. al. Kodanda Rama Rao et. In the present study CD value is taken as 2.1 269.3 297. CD.P.5 431.7 228. For a given location. the design value of (hmax u2) is computed from Eq.3.0 for rectangular column members and 3.091 0.6 210.107 0.64 476.110 0.6 149.6 72. 2 Run up Zone of Tsunami Hydrodynamic (drag) force is expressed as proportional to the product of the square of flow velocity and the projected area of the structure. hmaxu 2 = 0.0 for wall members.0 ISSN: 0975-5462 6200 . 6195-6203 Structur h Tsunami Z R L Fig.7 346. is obtained from Eq.11  Z  2 R R gR 2   FD = 1 ρCD bhmax u2 2 (2) (3) where L – Distance of location of the structure from shore line R – Maximum run up height of tsunami above shore line Z – Height of location point of the structure above shore line hmax .0 459.2 and the corresponding drag force.8 447.1 Type .3.Mass density of sea water b .5 439. Time period and base shear values due to earthquake forces and hydrodynamic forces due to tsunami Type of Structure Type .088 0.84 200. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol.Breadth of exposed column/wall member Using Eq.0 28.0 336. FD.7 202.4 412.2 274.125 – 0.6 Natural Time Period (sec) 0. It may be noted that. the analyses are carried out for independent actions of tsunami and earthquake separately.0 201.3 322.0 310.3 323.4 352. Table 2. the values of hydrodynamic force on all types of structures are calculated for different inundation depths and the values are presented in Table 2. The drag coefficient value. Eq.5 Type .2 Type .0 575.400 Due to earthquake Due to Tsunami Base Shear (KN) Hydrodynamic force in (kN) when Seismic ground First floor Zone hmax = 3m hmax = 5m hmax = 6m hmax = 2m floor level level II III II III II III II III II III II III 287.3 Type . is taken as 2.4 Type .Maximum Inundation Depth above base of the structure u – Tsunami wave velocity approaching the structure ρ . when the structures are located in different seismic regions.

091 0.000 Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 6 0.100 0. 2(11).P. Kodanda Rama Rao et.107 0.385 0.050 0.450 0. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol.110 Fig.250 0.300 0.1 structure.400 Time period in Seconds 0. Corresponding results for Types 2 . 6195-6203 0.6 structures are shown graphically in Figs.400 0. 2010. 4 is the graphical representation of Storey height vs Shear force due to earthquake and Inundation depth vs Hydrodynamic force due to tsunami for Type . 5~9.200 0.150 0. al.3 is the graphical representation of Type of Structure Vs Time period due to Earthquake Forces Fig.088 0. ISSN: 0975-5462 6201 .350 0.

6 Seismic Zone II III II III II III II III II III II III hc (in meters) 3. Further. 2010.4 Type . the tsunami force and earthquake force are equal in magnitude. For values below hc. Conclusions  The shelter should be designed both for ground shaking initially and for subsequent triggered tsunami.6 3. while in case of tsunami.2 5.4 3. the imparted forces on the structure depend upon the velocity.1 6. it is observed that slender structures produce less base shear compared to those of rigid structures.0 5. The earthquake force mainly depends upon the characteristics of ground motion. from the graphs. al. It is also observed that reduction in mass at lower floor levels decrease the base shear value.P.2 3.1 Type .3 The time period values of Type – 1 to 4 structures are found less compared to Type 5& 6 structures which indicates that reduction of stiffness in ground storey increases the time period of the structure. 2(11).  Decrease in stiffness of lower level floors (soft-storey) increases the time period of the structure. Table 3. Proposed guideline for design Type of Structure Type . From the results. Such hc values for the six types of structures when situated in seismic zones II & III are presented in Table 3. inundation depth and the exposed area on the wave side of the structure.4 4.3 Type .5 Type .5 4. Kodanda Rama Rao et.2 Type .2 6. Result Analysis The time period values of the chosen six buildings with different structure configurations are shown in fig.3 4. particularly when ground floors are with cellars. This could be an effective guideline for better design in future. earthquake forces and values above hc. tsunami forces are predominant. it is noticed that at some specific height.  Base shear values against seismic conditions increase with increase of stiffness in upper floors and decrease ISSN: 0975-5462 6202 .0 Design criteria i) for heights > hc. stiffness.4 4. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. the design shall be for tsunami forces and ii) for heights < hc. hc. seismic weight and configuration of the structure. 6195-6203 6. the design shall be for earthquake force 7.

pp 29-32.J (2005) “Development of design guidelines for structures that serve as tsunami vertical evacuation sites” Report No. the design criteria should be such that. Washington State Department of Natural Resources.2005-4.I. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. Tsuneo Okada et al. Murat Saatcioglu. while the structural elements (column.The Canadian Association for earthquake Engineering. (2000) “Near Shore flow velocity of southwest Hokkaido Earthquake Tsunami” Journal of Waterway Port. while the exposed area on seaward side of the structure in run up zone is a major factor to resist tsunami wave pressures. New Delhi (2006). 6195-6203 with increase of stiffness in lower floors. (2005) “Tsunami loads and Structural Design of Tsunami Refuge Buildings”. ISSN: 0975-5462 6203 .A.Resistant shelters. pp 235 – 242. 2004 Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami” CAEE. 2(11).Ahmed Ghobarah and Ioan Nistor (2005). Tsutsumi. where as such soft stories tend to fail under severe seismic conditions. Coastal and Ocean Engineering May / June 2000. 2010. of 3rd International Conference on Protection of Structures against Hazards: Italy. “Tsunami Engineering Technical Report No. In view of this a balanced design approach is necessary in planning Earthquake – Tsunami . beam.R. The shelter should be designed to allow the waves to pass through by braking the walls (non-structural elements) at tsunami reached level.K. “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures” Printice Hall of India. et al. Depending upon the intensity of the tsunami and the seismic zone in which the structure is located. Matsutomi.H. H & Shuto.P. Pankaj Agarwal and Manish Shrikhande. justifying the general conclusion that flexible structures are more resistant to earthquakes forces compared to rigid structures. Reddy S. DCRC. Robertson. (2006) “Terrain Evaluation and Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Structures in Urban Environs” Proc. Tohoku University. and Preuss. while above the height (hc) the tsunami forces are to be considered     8. pp 1 – 21. below the height (hc) earthquake forces are to be considered.C. al. 1893 (Part-I)2002: “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures” Fifth Revision 2002. et al. frame buildings with open ground storey are considered effective to reduce the tsunami force. Yeh.N (1994). pp 136-143. lateral bracing and other structural connections) are designed to withstand the tsunami impact. Weight of structure plays vital role under seismic conditions.S.11. References [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] I. R. Kodanda Rama Rao et.Reconnaissance Report on“The December 26. mostly at ground floor.