This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Jews had been excluded from mainstream European life, and separated out in many different ways for centuries. During the 19th century some countries allowed Jew s to take part in modern society. Once legalrestrictions were lifted, many Jews became very involved with the societies in which they lived, often taking leadin g roles in arts, politics, science and business. In societies that were undergoing changes many people felt insecure and some fel t that the Jews were still outsiders. This led to resentment of those Jews who w ere successful. Wilhelm Marr’s The Victory of Judaism over Germanism: Viewed from a Nonreligious P oint of View pdf http://mk.christogenea.org/_files/Marr-Text-English.pdf In 1879 a German journalist, Wilhelm Marr, Willhelm Marr first used the term ‘antisemite’ to describe people who hated Jews. He defined the J ews as a separate ‘race’. He drew on old Christian prejudices against Judaism. He ar gued that everything that was wrong in Europe was wrong because of the Jews. In contrast, Marr identified what he called the Aryan peoples, from Northern Eur ope, as the highest type of human being. He defined them as being biologically s uperior and claimed they were only held back by Jewish power. How We Define Antisemitism Though the manifestation of antisemitism takes many forms, the most widely used definition of contemporary antisemitism is the Working Definition produced in 20 05 by the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), an E U body which monitors racism and antisemitism in EU Member States (the EUMC has since been succeeded by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)). The FRA has urged all member states of the EU to use this definition as a basis for dealing with antisemitism and it was drawn up after wide consultation includ ing with Jewish organizations. The Working Definition, signed off by the Managem ent Board of the FRA comprising 27 appointees of the 27 EU governments (plus the Council of Europe and Commission appointees), can reasonably be assumed to refl ect the views of each of those governments. adl_anti-semitism_presentation_february_2012.pdf https://docs.google.com/open?id =1B2QkIRQI6cHsVBN-n_n_CRvfEFkVDI9OQWPSh0-ya610cI8goW53xmlLZfHn The UK government’s response to the Report of the All Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism was that the Macpherson definition of racism, which defines a racist incident as “any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person”, includes antisemitism. Although the UK government did not ado pt the EUMC Working Definition, implicit in their response is an acknowledgment that since the Macpherson definition is even broader than the EUMC Working Defin ition, the latter is subsumed into the former. According to the EUMC, Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred t oward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish com munity institutions and religious facilities. In addition, such manifestations c ould also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antise mitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for ‘why things go wrong’. The EUMC then goes on to cite specific examples of antisemitism including: Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about
Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not excl usively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the med ia, economy, government or other societal institutions. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing c ommitted by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-J ews. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and it s supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggeratin g the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priori ties of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. More at source Short URL: http://www.newsnet14.com/?p=106223