Are you sure?
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
6 , NOVEMBER 1982
1237
Radiation from Aperture Antennas Radiating the in Presence of a Dielectric Sphere M. S . NARASIMHAN, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE AND
S . RAVISHANKAR, STUDENT MEMBER, IEEE
AbsrractA more systematic and rigorous procedure for analyzing the radiation patterns of an openended Waveguide radiating in the presence of a dielectric sphere is presented. The analysisis based on the formula developed earlier [5] for radial translation of the sphericalvectorwavefunctions. An experimentalprogram is described which confirms the validity of the analysis presented.
tx
Fig. 1. Coordinate system for analysis of radiation patterns.
I. INTRODUCTION The radiation characteristics of a dielectric sphere mounted infront of anopenendeddominantmode waveguidehave received considerable attention inthe past [ 1 ] [ 31. This study is ofsignificance in multiple or adaptivebeam parabolic antennas, dielectric in heating, and in beam switching using dielectric lenses. This problem is also of significance in studies on interaction of microwaves with biological objects modeled asdielectricspheres [4]. However, no systematicapproach was presented in the past t o analyze radiation characteristics of aperture antennas, radiating in the presence of a dielectric sphere. The techniques presented in the past involved approximating the aperture antenna to be a combination of electric and magnetic Hertzian dipoles [ 1I , [ 21 o r taking recourse t o "ray tracing" procedure whenever the radiating aperture exhibited rotational symmetry[3 J . Inthiscommunication,suchapproximationsareavoided and the radiating near fields of the openended waveguide are accurately expressed in terms of spherical vector wave functions. Subsequently making use of radial translation of spherical vector wave functions [ 51, [6] the scattering problem is analyzedmorerigorously. A systematicexperimental program was also carried out t o establish every good agreement betweenthetheoretically derived and experimentally measof ured results. The analysis presented holds good for any type aperture antenna.
n(n 1) cos 1Voremn=  , ( k ~ ' p , ~e') ~ (COS m@'$ kR ' Sin
+
1 +7
kR

+
m
kR' sin 0' aR'
 [R'Z,(kR')]PHm(COS e')
a
Sin
m@'$,
cos
Inorder to determine ain and bin accurately for aprescribed diameter of the openended cylindrical guide excited in the transverse electric (TE, 1) mode, the near fields of the guide are estimated accurately over a hemisphere of radius Ro where Ro<OO' using Silver's aperture integration formula [7]. The E , H thus determined was subsequently used to calculate ain, bin appearing in (1) and (2). Analysis of the fields scattered by the dielectric sphere could be considerably simplified withoutintroducinganyapproximationforthe incident field if origin ofthecoordinatesystemforexpressing ' the incident field could be shifted from 0 t o 0. This is made possible by expressing the spherical vector wave function appearingin (1) and (2) about adisplacedorigin 0 (Fig. 1) [SI, [ 6 ] w i t h i n d e x m = 1 , a s
Zi(R, e , @ )=
x
(Ainzoemn
+ BinNOemn)
11. ANALYSIS The geometry of the openendedwaveguide radiating in the presence of the sphereis shown in Fig. 1. Itis ensured that the (02') the cylindrof center of the sphereis located on the axis ical waveguide. vector wave functionandarefunctions If the center of the aperture (of the openendedwaveguide) andthe spherical of unprimed coordinates (origin 0) R , 8 , @. The expressions is is located at O ' , the fieldradiated at any arbitrary point for coefficients A U nand Bun are as follows: given by I81
E,.(R', e',
=
x
n
(ainMofemn bi,Noremn)
+
(1) (2)
Z i ( ~ 'e', 4') =+Yo ,
where
x
n
(ai,Noremn
+ binZOfemn)
 [n(n + 1) + u(u + 1)
*
a(m, n, m, u , p )
Manuscript received July 8, 1981; revised November 30, 1981. This work mas supported by DRDO, Governmentof India. Theauthorsarewith the ElectromagneticsandAntennasGroup, Institute of Technology, Madras Centre for Systems and Devices, Indian 600 036, India.
0018926X/82/11001237$00.75 0 1982 IEEE
.1)(2q .n+v2lnul and aP = 1) [(n + D + 1)* p2] [p2 4p2 . 6 .I)!! (n .1238 IEEE TF&TSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION.9 GHz). fields.. NOVEMBER 1982 where the coefficients ~ ( m n.v)2] (9) (10) p=n+v. kR aR Having determined ~ d . l a vector mode function (1) and ( 2 ) integrating over 9 and applying the orthogonality relations for associated Legendre the expressions the for functions [ 8 ] we obtain following four unknowns for each value of n : and kR aR l a DHN2 =. Photographs of the waveguide sphere assembly employed in our experimental setup are shown in Figs. and b.i ~ ~ ~ 0 ) D ~ ~ 2 ( andscattered .a . The input VSWR of the openended waveguide was also measured in the presence of the dielectric sphere over the same band.l)! ! = (2q . The assumptionwas experimentally verified as follows..5 to 9. Hi. VOL. In the analysis presentedabove it was (19) ~ o ) l A i presumed that the presence of the dielectric sphere does not W1 significantly affect the aperture distribution in the waveguide. sphere The was supported expanded by polystyrene whose relative permittivity was 1..4 . the field at any .l)(n +u ) 2 ~ l)] (13) where (2q . b d n . from therecursion relation [ 5 ] ap.[ R h n 2 ( k R ) ] . E d .[Rj. NO.6 cm from O’. The input voltage standingwave ratio (VSWR) of the YO Qsn = Ain ( 2 0 ) openended circular cylindrical waveguide without the dielecW1 tric sphere was measured over a band (9. An openended waveguide with an aperture diameter of 2. p ) = ap are obtained . H.(ap2 + apfor .3 cm was also constructed.008. 2 ( ~ 0 ) . Both the VSWR patterns matched satisfactorily whichjustifies the assumption made.1. center of the radiating aperture.(n . center of the dielectricsphere. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY A dielectricspherewithadiameter of 8..1)!!(2v. @) Disassembled view of openended waveguide and dielectric sphere. E.1 (1 The startingvalues for therecursion relation are an+v = (2n . [ 91 and applying the boundary conditions [Ete + Ese 1 r=ro = [ E d e 1 r=ro (1 5) (16) 7)(1 Fig.08). U. of the incident point in space may be obtained by addition adn = [ ~ J ~ ~ k ~ 0 ) ~ . Hd in terms of spherical with DJN= . the fieldsscattered by the sphere could bedescribedfollowinga procedure outlined in [ 81.3 u p . .m)!(v + m) un+u (12) and un+v2 = (2n+2v3)[num2(2n (2n .4m2)c7p2 + apup= o . The waveguide sphere where . 2 .0 cm was con= structed with Teflon ( ~ d 2.l)!! (2n (n + u)! + 2v . 2(a) and 2(b).3.(kR)] 111. (b) [Ei@+ Esol r=ro = [Ed@] r=ro [Hie + HSe 1r=rO = [&e 1r=ro (a)Openendedwaveguidepositioned in front of dielectric sphere.1)(2u .3) . The dielectricspherewaspositionedinfront of the openended guide with its axis coinciding with the axis of the openended is waveguide such that the center of the sphere (0) located at the a distance of 5. (14) Once the incident field is expressed in terms of spherical which is also the modes with respect to the displaced origin 0. [Hie + HsgI r=ro = [HdeI r=ro* (1 8) Substituting for Ei. m. AP30.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION. (4 (a) Hplane radiation pattern (amplitude) of waveguide radiating in front of sphere.240 %Ot THEO. (c) Hplane phase pattern of waveguide radiating in front of sphere. (d) Eplane phase pattern of waveguide radiating in front of sphere. EPLANE 1239 4 8 1 R * 9. 40I z m 4 W 0' POLAR ANGLE IN OEG. . (b) Eplane radiation pattern (amplitude) of waveguide radiating in front of sphere. a W I 30 40 50 F l  > a I POLAR ANGLE I N DEGREES 20  a 2 W W U a 80 eo  120 120 160 160  200  200  . 6 . 303 EA9346 Fig. VOL. 3. AP30. R = S2cms. 5 16 z W Measurmd g n 2 20W % J a 24  28 . m U 1 12 Calculated 8 0.81 = 92cms.87GHz 1 R = 92cms.36 36 I 32 t I I I I 1 3 ! IO 20 30 40 50 POLAR ANGLE I N DEGREES (a)  I I I I I 60 ' 0 1 0 20 30 40 POLAR ANGLE I N DEGREES 50 C 6 (b) 240 E PLANE f D 9. Calculated m a Measured I Calculated t m W W I2O80 a 0 . NO.NOVEIMBER 1982 0.
The n from model offers advantagesi extracting the anisotropy coefficient the Doppler spectrum of the received signal.. Tech. [2] W. vol. Unit vectors associated with (R.10581061. 1975. Time Harmonic EM Fields. I . Lo. VOL. 0018926X/82/11001240$00. I. has been explained inananisotropicscatteringmodeldevelopedbyBirkemeier e t al. Antennas Propagat. New York: McCrawHill. Mason. AnnArbor. no. bdn [I] The anisotropic scattering model developed by Birkemeier is based on ascatteringtheory developed byTatarski [4].." IEEE Trans. ch. Bannerjee. Tai.75 1982 IEEE 0 . Whenever disagreement is found in the Eplane. Ho. 695.D. ch. Mason.1240 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION. V. V . and K. the edge diffraction was not in the taken account. H . CONCLUSION A more systematic approach to the problem of analysis of radiation patterns of openended guides radiating in the presence of a dielectric sphere has been presented. Foster. Electromagnetic Theory. This coefficient can be considered a basic parameter characterizing the state the atof mosphere.POST. no. J. J . [4] H . R . S. Microwave Antenna Theory and Design. May 1971. results.3(b). the error could be attributed to the fact that while calculating the incidentfield. vol.and Hplane patterns measured at a frequency of 9. Free space propagation constant. The measured E. T. IA 50011. Spherical hankel function.'' IEEE Trans. Dec. R. T. F. Harrington. 8.and Hplane amplitude and phase patterns are shown in Figs. 1 The anechoicchamber was built out of ECCOSORBCVHNRL Manuscript received October 30.87 GHz. revised March 1." fEEE Trans. is This effect. assembly was mountedonanazimuthpositionerinside an anechoic chamber' such that the axis of rotation of the posiwere tioner passed through 0. in the form power versus of Doppler frequency or power versus crosspath position. New York: Dover. G . R . Sratton. 6.1982. "Radiation characteristics of a dielectricsphereloadedcorrugatedpipe. REFERENCES V . 5. pp. "Multiple scattering by spheres. 1969. Microwave Theory Tech.1981. into which is somewhat significant Eplane. Efforts to evaluate theanisotropycoefficientfromRake forwardscatterradar signals using Birkemeier's modelare complicated by the fact that data. pp. [3] P." IEEE Trans. pp. Urbana. Chatterjee. Ramanujam. AP23. 3(c). and C.. absorbers and was used previously to measure the patterns of a number The authors are with theDepartment of Electrical Engineering. and M. "Radiation from a homogeneous spheremounted on a waveguide aperture. Electric amplitude field coefficients the for scattered field located outside the sphere. [2]. Rep. NOMENCLATURE Spherical polar coordinates of a point in space. The validity of the analysis has been supported by measured results based on asystematicexperimentalstudy. J . 1975. APSO. S ." Ph. 3(a). 6 . Associated legendre polynomial of first kind. the halfpower width of the Doppler spectrum can fluctuate a great deal. Crosswell. NOVEMBER 1982 designusingdielectric lenses. Sept.pp. A. Free space admittance. Thesimplifiedanisotropic in t i communication hs permits scattering model described simple. J . 1941. Incident electric field amplitude coefficients. Hagan. 647656. 7. Much of this variability is caused by winds in the scattering volume. Sept. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL I z:( k d ) k adn. dissertation. . This Gaussian scattering model is mcan to be used for interpretingthe Doppler spectraof signals taken from a forwardscatterradarsystemequippedwitha Rake receiver. Ames. Neelakantaswamy and D. 1975. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are thankful to P. AP23." Antenna University Lab. butwith A as aparameter [ 5 ] . IV. The calculated results show satisfactory agreement with the measured results. 378390. vol.."Microwaveirradiation [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] \ ? A Simplified Model for Interpreting the Doppler Spectrum of ForwardScatter Radar Signals ROBERT E. B. NO. However.waveguideradiatingin the presence of the sphere) was 92 cm. Antennas Propugat. AND HOSNY M. K . Silver. 1972. 3(d) forR = 92 cm. Relative permittivity of the dielectric. Electric amplitude field coefficients the for fields located inside the sphere. "Multiple scattering of EM waves by spheresPan IMultipoleexpansion andray opticalsolution.. The distance of separation between transmitter (source the horn antenna) and receiver (test) antenna (viz. even after the effect of the wind has been taken into account. Iowa of feed horns at Xband with very successful and repeatable measured State University. 728730. 1965. B. 4). New York: McCrawHill Book Co. of Illinois.1961. MTT23. The anisotropy in the scatteringmodelaccounts diffor the differences in the correlation lengths along the ferent axes. INTRODUCTION Records of the Doppler frequency of signals received by a Rake forward scatter radar sounding system indicate considerable variability in the shape of the Doppler spectra. F. The study reported here is expected to be of value in a number of applications. "The electromagnetic radiationfromsimplesources inthe presence of a homogeneousdielectricsphere. vol. Univ. Prithviraj. IEEE. Michigan. S . Bruning and Y.The analysis could beemployed any for type of aperture antenna including flared horns. which evidence of fluctuations in the azimuthal angle dependence of the scattered signal. IBRAHIM AbsrrucrAn approximate form of Birkemeier's anisotropic scattering function is developed. must be fit to a family of theoretical curves using the samevariables. Antennas Propagat. S. 5 . direct evaluationof the anisotropy coefficient. The E. In Birkemeier's model the ratio of the horizontal correlation distance to the vertical correlation distance is defined as the anisotropy coefficient A . AP19. Govind of our group for their interest in our work and their assistance in the experimental work. SENIOR MEMBER.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?