You are on page 1of 2

The Big Bang Origin of the Universe and the Sustainable Universe By Anthony Blackstone, B.A., J.D., M.B.A.

, Phd. Perpetual (C)Copyright and (P)Patent by Anthony J. Fejfar and Neothomism, P.C. (PA) Table of Contents Chapter One and Only Sir Isaac Newtons Physics and the Scientific Law of Conservation of Energy is Flawed Sir Isaac Newton, the author of Newtonian Physics in science, wrote that there exists in the Material Universe, the Principle of Conservation of Energy. The idea of this Principle is that if you put a certain amount of Energy into any physical system, that system can only output the amount of Energy that was put in, or less. In other words, Newton said that you can never produce more Energy out of a physical system than you put in. For example, Newton would say that if a person used a hand crank to turn a mill wheel, then the energy or physical power manifested by the mill wheel cannot be more than was put in using the hand crank. In asserting the foregoing, Isaac Newton was wrong. You see, you can use a gear system, for example, to increase the power of a hand crank which is being used to power a mill wheel. As you may know, if the hand crank is used to turn a small roller gear, which in turn, turns a larger roller gear, which in turn is linked by a shaft to a equally large roller gear, which in turn, turns another small roller gear, you should find that the physical power turning the mill wheel has a torque or turning power which is at least ten times that produced by a hand crank which does not use a gear physical power transfer system. Given the foregoing, we can see that the

use of a gear physical power transfer system results in a physical power system where 1 unit of

physical power in produces 10 units of physical power out, thus proving that Newtons Law of Conservation of Energy is not a universally valid rule at all, but instead is proven wrong when a gear physical power transfer system is used. Thus, it is now proven that Newtonian Physics is not universally valid, but instead is flawed to some degree. As an additional point, Basic Calculus can provide us with an Equation which predicts and describes the foregoing: Energy Input (EI) x Gear Transfer Probability Quotient (GTPQ) = Energy Out (EO)

EI x GTPQ = EO Now, let us apply the foregoing to the Universe. Aristotle and Aquinas wrote about the First Cause, Uncaused Cause which is the Origin of the Universe. In contemporary times, scientist Carl Sagan writes about a similar concept, the Big Bang which started the Universe. Sagan and others are predicting that the Universe will stop expanding at some point and then collapse back into nothingness. However, I do not think that this will happen. As noted above, there are Step Up Generators located in the Universe. Those Step Up Generators can take one Unit of Energy and Step it up to 100 or 1,000 or more Units of Energy. My position is that Stars, Quasars, and Suns all pull in astral dust and even asteroids and then uses this fuel or energy to step up Huge Amounts of Energy, which is radiated back into the Universe, such that the Universe will not collapse as Sagan thinks, but will keep expanding at a moderate rate. And, even more so, it is possible that some Stars or Quasars or Suns are Perpetual Motion Generators which are Self Generating Sources of Energy, such that they produce enough Energy to sustain themselves and to radiate excess Energy into the Universe. In this sense, then, the Universe is

Self Sustaining and Spiritual. Thus, Newtons idea of Conservation of Energy is wrong, and in fact, many or even most processes in the Universe involve Internal Step Up Generators which produce more out than they take in.