17 views

Uploaded by sam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal

today a seed.. tomorrow a branchlet?

save

You are on page 1of 1

So to focus on the 'truth validity' of logical statements is superficial and somewhat arbitrary.. Is not not white identically equal to white?* I contend: not exactly and so the deeper notion is set membership or set theory. I am most certainly a member of the caucasian sub-race of human beings.. I belong to that proper subset of human beings; I'm an element of that set. Again, the deeper notion is set membership compared to logical statements which are arbitrary in meaning.. The real question is: is there anything deeper than set membership? Human beings are traditionally thought of as hybrid spiritual-physical creatures; we have spiritual aspects and physical aspects. The 'problem' is: those characteristics appear to be contradictory. From my standpoint, the spiritual realm needs the physical plane to investigate and explore spiritual concepts just as the physical realm needs the spiritual to associate meaning to human life.. The realms are interdependent.. I specifically avoided the term 'attribute' because of its simplicity but I reinstate it here: attributes are a deeper notion than sets and therefore more core to mathematics and science. Let's restate the argument before we progress.. We can describe 'reality' in terms of logical statements: 1. Something is true or not true but this denies 'grey area' which probably accounts for most of human activity. 2. A deeper notion is set membership; it belongs or does not belong to a set depending on its attributes. 3. Therefore, 'the science of attributes' is the core of all science and mathematics. Attributes define set membership and so how we define attributes is absolutely critical to sets, membership, math, and science. From our discussion above, we can see attributes belong to different categories: exclusive to a particular set, shared among sets, and global / common to all sets .. A good related question is: is the attribute of spiritual a global attribute of all living things? Or is it exclusive to human beings? I contend it's a global attribute.. But we sidetrack.. Back to attributes.. There are three types of attributes: 1. An attribute is exclusive when only one set possesses it. 2. An attribute is shared when more than one set possesses it. 3. An attribute is global when all sets possess it. Examples are: living is a global attribute of living things, sexually reproducing is a shared attribute of living things, and (as far as we're aware) technology producing individuals are exclusive to human beings. Mathematical examples: number is shared between (but not limited to) real, complex, and matrices, symbol is global for mathematical objects/operations, and empty (the set with no elements) is exclusive to the null-set .. At this point, the real question becomes: is there anything more (meaningful) we can say about attributes? Is there anything deeper than attributes? ..In the history of math, the most profound result discovered is this (by Gödel): logic cannot assert its own consistency. In more colloquial terms: the language of science cannot be used to determine the validity of science. In other words, we cannot 'prove' science with science. We must (by fact) appeal to 'other things'.. Modal logic? Meta-math? Spirituality? In a very real sense, there is no 'solution' within science that can solve this conundrum. Math/science is 'fundamentally incomplete'.. The theory of attributes is the only rational / reasonable approach to sets, math, and science. Let's develop it. *U = W + Wb + Wc, the universe of objects equals all white objects plus their boundary plus their complement. Wb may or may not be part of W (a closed or open set); not white may or may not include the boundary; not not white is at most W + Wb but may be W so it's unclear.

- Critical ThinkingUploaded byLinda Medina
- rujukan 1Uploaded bylilengahmoi
- Why I Studied Chemical EngineeringUploaded byPedro Díaz
- Matematik Kertas 1 Tingkatan 4Uploaded byNur Nadiah
- 0580_y03_sq_2,Uploaded byKassem Farhat
- Team @ Rise Academy _ Rise Academy, KotaUploaded byRanveer
- The Prehistory of ProbabilityUploaded byEd
- Arth MaticUploaded byl8o8r8d8s8i8v8
- Curriculum-Sheet-CSc-2013-2014-2013-06-11bUploaded bydowtormac
- Heidegger - May 1933. Rektoratsrede [Eng]Uploaded bya thinking reed....
- CVUploaded bySuman Pal
- program booklet- vsb math conference finalUploaded byapi-288480953
- Chp6 TechniquesUploaded bySyed Tayyab
- cat syllUploaded byDurgesh Kumar
- Algebra 2 Houghton Mifflin HarcourtUploaded bybaolanchi

- Engineering SynergyUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Why Plato's Republic can never workUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The Discipline of the Holy SpiritUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The Connection Between Control Theory, Linear Systems Theory, and Regenerative EngineeringUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The nature of scienceUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The Purposes of RIO and the Globalization of Appropriate TechnologyUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Regenerative ApproachUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Meme theory, idea inertia, and regenerationUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- A proof of God's existence based on information theoryUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Growing conscious agents in a VRUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Counting the 'uncountable' - pushing the boundaries in number/set theoryUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- gamma, the Euler-Mascheroni constantUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The unforgivable deficiencies of our math educational systemUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- General requirements for set theory and any quantum theoryUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- The hunter-gatherer clan and group dynamicsUploaded bysam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal