Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

72 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Example 2 - Pile Cap, STM's Method (15)
- Aircraft Structures
- Socket Friction Micro Pile
- UPHSD Strength of Materials Handout
- 3. Civil - IJCE - Effect of Sand Densification Due to Pile Driving Faisal I . Shalabi Saudi Arabia
- Tech.paper
- A Parametric Study of the Post-buckling Behaviour of Steel Plates
- Chapter 4
- SOM 4th Sem
- Structural Engineer - Issue 9 - 2010
- Part1-percobaan 2-1
- 1488-5766-1-SM
- K Composite TH EXP 12
- Numerical Study on Shear Stress Variation
- Vacuum Pump Shaft-Study 1-4
- PAD EYES
- minaf2016
- se-7-493-2016.pdf
- tnpsc.docx
- Neoprene–concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing.pdf

You are on page 1of 6

www.geo-slope.com

1 Introduction

This example simulates pulling a pile out of the ground. It is not a realistic field case, but numerically the simulation makes it possible to verify the behavior of a structural element with slip elements on both sides. The primary purpose of this example is to check the behavior of the slip (interface) elements in SIGMA/W when there is a beam along the center of the slip elements.

Figure 1 shows the problem configuration and setup. Basically, there are interface elements down the center of a box with a beam along the center of the interface elements. Of significance is that the beam does not go to the bottom of the interface elements, and that the beam extends up into the air above the ground. To have the beam above the ground surface, we need a geometric Line in space and then the beam can be attached to the Line.

30 28 26 24 22 20 18

Elevation - m

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

Distance - m

Figure 1 Configuration and setup for pile pullout test

Page 1 of 6

www.geo-slope.com

The interface (slip) zone extends below the bottom end of the beam, as shown in the magnified view in Figure 2. The reason for this is that we do not want to directly connect the beam to a mesh node that is common with the soil; that is to say, we do not want the beam directly attached to the soil. We want the beam to be able to slip within the soil.

The pulling effect is simulated with a displacement boundary condition at the top of the pile of +0.01 m per load step (the + sign indicates upward or in the direction of the positive y-direction). The pile is modeled as a beam. The properties of the beam are not all that important, except that the stiffness (E) should be considerably great than that for the soil.

Analysis: Insitu

We need the lateral stress on the pile to activate the friction between the soil and the pile. Therefore, we need to start with an insitu analysis to set up the stress state in the ground. The soil is assigned a Poissons Ratio of 0.495. This is analogous to a Ko condition of 0.98. (It is not possible to make = 0.5 to get Ko exactly equal to 1.0). The total unit weight of the soil is 20 kN/m3. Figure 3 shows the lateral stress on the pile. The pile is 20 m long and with = 20 and Ko = 0.98, the lateral stress at the bottom of the pile should be close to 400 kPa which is the case as shown in Figure 3.

Lateral stress

30

Y (m)

20

Page 2 of 6

www.geo-slope.com

This test uses only undrained strength for the frictional behavior between the pile and the soil. Since the cohesive strength is not a function of the lateral stress, it is numerically a more stable test and easier to compare with hand calculations. Figure 4 shows the slip force between the soil and pile on the left and on the right. The pile is 20 m long, C is 100 kPa and the total frictional slip force therefore should be 2000 kN. The maximum value in Figure 4 is just above 2000. The slight additional resistance is due to end-effects at the bottom of the pile, even though the pile is not directly connected to the soil, as discussed earlier.

Left slip - time

2500 2500

Right slip

2000

1500

1500

1000

1000

500

500

0 0 10 Time (sec) 20

0 0 10 Time (sec) 20

Figure 4 Slip forces between soil and pile on the left and on the right

The total frictional resisting force will be the sum of the left and right sides. This can be illustrated by looking at the slip forces along the center of the interface elements. Physically, there are no slip surfaces down the middle, but numerically, the comparable forces are available due to the double-layer formulation of the interface elements. In this case, because the outside two slip forces are in the same direction, the middle forces will be the sum of the outer two, but of the opposite sign (the algebraic sum must be zero). This is confirmed in Figure 5. The middle slip forces are physically in the pile (beam), not in the center of the interface.

Page 3 of 6

Center slip

0 -500 -1000 Y-Slip Force (kN) -1500 -2000 -2500 -3000 -3500 -4000 -4500 0 10 Time (sec) 20

www.geo-slope.com

Figure 6 shows the axial force in the pile. The maximum is -4082 kN at the top, which matches the total frictional resistance as indicated in Figure 5 (the minus sign indicates tension). At the bottom, the axial force approaches zero as it correctly should.

Beam axial

30

Y (m)

20

Now we will switch the properties of the interface material from C = 100 kPa and = zero to C = zero and = 30 degrees. In this case, it is not as simple to compare the SIGMA/W results with hand

Page 4 of 6

www.geo-slope.com

calculations, due to the variable lateral stress with depth and since the frictional resistance is a function of the lateral stress. If the pile and soil would remain in perfect contact, and if the lateral stress distribution with depth would remain unaltered by pulling on the pile, then the total frictional force should be around: F = * h2 /2 * tan = 20 * 20 * 20 /2 * tan 30 = 2310 kN times 2 sides = 4620 kN. The soil and pile, however, do not remain in perfect contact and the lateral stress gets altered by the pulling. As a result, the SIGMA/W frictional forces do not match the hand-calculated values, as is evident in Figure 7. The resulting total is only about 3360 kN.

Center slip

0 -500 -1000 -1500 -2000 -2500 -3000 -3500 0 5 Time (sec) 10 15

One of the reasons for the difference is that the soil and pile separate at the top and consequently the slip forces go to zero. This is evident in Figure 8, where at the top the slip surface has gone to zero. This is further evident in Figure 9, which shows the axial force distribution in the pile. The distribution is nearly linear in the bottom half of the pile, but then varies significantly in the top half. The forces actually become nearly constant near the top, which is a reflection of almost no frictional resistance toward the end of the pulling.

Page 5 of 6

www.geo-slope.com

Slip - depth

30

Y (m)

20

Beam axial

30

Y (m)

20

Conclusion

The example confirms the correct behavior of a beam along the middle of interface elements and the correct behavior of the slip elements when they are vertical.

Page 6 of 6

- Example 2 - Pile Cap, STM's Method (15)Uploaded byMarkoGlamuzina
- Aircraft StructuresUploaded by5799495320834
- Socket Friction Micro PileUploaded byPalak Shivhare
- UPHSD Strength of Materials HandoutUploaded byCedric Dela Cruz
- 3. Civil - IJCE - Effect of Sand Densification Due to Pile Driving Faisal I . Shalabi Saudi ArabiaUploaded byiaset123
- Tech.paperUploaded byazmadilbarrizvi
- A Parametric Study of the Post-buckling Behaviour of Steel PlatesUploaded byViet Duc Dang
- Chapter 4Uploaded byalsafi118424
- SOM 4th SemUploaded byZain Mir
- Structural Engineer - Issue 9 - 2010Uploaded byntatar90
- Part1-percobaan 2-1Uploaded byRendra Ardyanto
- 1488-5766-1-SMUploaded bymrezaian
- K Composite TH EXP 12Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Numerical Study on Shear Stress VariationUploaded bylajharka
- Vacuum Pump Shaft-Study 1-4Uploaded bymarina890416
- PAD EYESUploaded byRachmad Hidayat
- minaf2016Uploaded bypushparajpingulkar
- se-7-493-2016.pdfUploaded byLILIANA ROJAS ESLAVA
- tnpsc.docxUploaded byranjithsteel
- Neoprene–concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing.pdfUploaded byrasika n
- Swelling Behaviour in a TunnelUploaded byHuseyin Ozturk
- The Impact of Deep Foundations of Building Structures on the Neighbouring Buildings a Static AnalysisUploaded byWendirad Beshada
- D 3967 – 95a R01__(ingles).pdfUploaded byFrancis
- Module 6 Drawing-Lecture 2Uploaded byBharath Achary T S
- CivilUploaded byPeter D.
- Theoretical and Experimental in-serviceUploaded byKristofer Chronicle
- Effect of Cyclic LoadingUploaded byrashmi
- Nozzle testUploaded byDarshan Panchal
- piling-terms-and-definitions-pdca-23-rev-1.pdfUploaded bymuhammad Lutfhi
- Assignment MD IUploaded byprajitsen damle

- 64 Interview QuestionsUploaded byshivakumar N
- NBCC-GCC.pdfUploaded byHemandra Kumar
- CVC guideline for BGUploaded byHemandra Kumar
- HddUploaded bylhikbani
- Chapter 6Uploaded byvekaveka
- Building Foundation by AzmatUploaded byazmat786
- Specifications for Excavation and EarthworkUploaded byAjay Singh
- Civil Engineering Objective Type QuestionsUploaded byJean Simon
- Civil Works ManualUploaded bySam Roger
- bsnl_w8_cs3_GCCUploaded byHemandra Kumar
- IM-1476691466Uploaded byHemandra Kumar
- limit state of flexureUploaded byHemandra Kumar
- engineering services(civil engg 1)Uploaded bykumarsarvan
- IS 1893Uploaded bybrindhu
- IES Syllabus CivilUploaded byMadhu Priya
- SFD_BMDUploaded byraj_anu13
- Advt. no. 04-2014Uploaded byAjay Singh
- GATUploaded bysantoshumi
- Mechanics of Materials Solution Manual 3rd Ed.Uploaded byserdartekin
- Pile Pull Out TestUploaded byHemandra Kumar
- Civil Conventional 10032012Uploaded byHemandra Kumar
- Top Public Sector CompaniesUploaded byHemandra Kumar

- STB ArchitectureUploaded bynewfolder20082008
- 414-datasheetUploaded byAhmad Hamouda
- notes on mathsUploaded byAyush Shaw
- QoS Performance Monitoring Benchmarking for Mobile Networks 2G 3G 4GUploaded byTawfiq Al-Qershi
- Estimate of Turbulent Fluxes With Eddy Covariance Technique in a Complex TopographyUploaded byDương Ánh
- Pipe Fitting LossesUploaded byslawi
- HW1Uploaded byAtul Viswanath
- Saunier Duval Thema f 23 e Installation Manual 121307Uploaded byLucianIonita
- Tortora Chapter 3Uploaded byLoren Grace Jaranilla-Anunciado
- A Fitted Mesh Method For Partial Differential Equations With A Time LagUploaded byIJRASETPublications
- Additional MathematicsUploaded byIman Abdul Rahman
- HMManualUploaded bySergio Concepcion
- Effect of Bga Reballing IpcUploaded byJozef Łapaj
- 1.0_Introduction to Engineering MechanicsUploaded bysanthiyaperemel
- (C. Du, F. Z.,1999).pdfUploaded bysamuel raj
- Cable-Stayed Bridges, Theory and Design, 2nd ed.pdfUploaded bymekkawi6650
- Basics of Hydrostatic Level Measurement Instrumentation ToolsUploaded byAbarajithan Rajendran
- Summary of AASHTO LRFD Seismic Column DesignUploaded byzimm0259
- Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Cross Layer Load Balancing in Tactical Multi-Gateway Wireless Sensor NetworkUploaded byAnonymous kw8Yrp0R5r
- Chapter 5.pptxUploaded byJoel Ouano
- math-zee gameUploaded byapi-285463164
- ISOPur HR Series Owners Manual.pdfUploaded bysync_arian
- Benchmark Drill and Blast and Mechanical Excavation Advance Rate for Underground Hard-rock Mine DevelopmentUploaded byJuniorMendoza97
- Magnetic and electric properties of magnetic particles.pdfUploaded byNedelcuGeorge
- Cable to Rod Connecion for Thermite WeldingUploaded byAmiableimpex
- International Conference on SHP Kandy Srilanka All Details_Papers_Technical Aspects-A_A34Uploaded byCrimsonPosh
- Control SystemUploaded bysunil dadarwal
- Catalog-Spiral Wound GasketsUploaded bysmab2162094
- FM TransmitterUploaded byZi Ming
- Trampas de VaporUploaded bySantiago Duran

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.